Loading...
Item H8Revised 3/99 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY To be considered with FKAA Contract Approval Item (1:30 pm) Meeting Date: Thursday, 05/18/00 Division: BOCC Bulk Item: Yes ❑ No X Department: Nora Williams AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of resolution of support for funded program of land acquisition and management in the area impacted by the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Facility. ITEM BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that the approval of a wastewater treatment facility for the island of Key Largo may lead to unwanted growth. This is perhaps the most decisive action we can take to make sure that doesn't happen. The CommuniKeys program should be finished on the island well before the facility itself is finished, and that program will lay out a vision for shaping the community in the ways the community WANTS to be shaped — areas for development, for natural corridors, for parks and recreation. This proposal would fund the shaping of Key Largo and Tavernier in agreement with that vision. It is very likely that we could also greatly increase the impacts of this program by applying for state and federal matching funds at our earliest opportunities. This program is only possible if we approve the program, as that will indicate that this amount of funding is acceptable and possible without adverse consequences, given that we have determined the wastewater treatment upgrade costs for thousands of onsite and package plant systems. This program was supported by the Water Quality Steering Committee. I genuinely believe we can accomplish some wonderful things for this area of our continuing municipal responsibility. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: Earlier this year, the BOCC approved unanimously. both Growth Management's CommuniKeys program and FKAA's movement forward with contract negotiations for a Key Largo AM wastewater treatment facility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: TOTAL COST: $10,000,000 BUDGETED: Yes ❑ No ❑ COST TO COUNTY: $1,000,000/year from the infrastructure sales tax in yrs. 2004-2014 APPROVED BY: COUNTY ATTY X OMB/PURCHASING ❑ RIS`K MANAGEMENT ❑ DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL: 4NA:: �•c� -DIVISION DIRECTOR NAME: . Williams DOCUMENTATION: INCLUDED: X TO FOLLOW: ❑ NOT REQUIRED: ❑ DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM #: uld RESOLUTION -2000 A RESOLUTION BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMMITTING TO A COMMUNITY MASTER PLANNING AND LAND ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED KEY LARGO WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA TO PROMOTE ORDERLY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE NATURAL AND MAN MADE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE FLORIDA KEYS Whereas, the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, upon the recommendation of the Monroe County Board of Commissioners, has negotiated a contract with the firm of Ogden Water Systems, Inc., to design, build, and operate a wastewater treatment system for Key Largo between Tavernier Creek and approximately Mile Marker 106; and, Whereas, the proposed wastewater treatment facility with an average daily treatment capacity of 2.2 million gallons per day (MGD) and a maximum capacity of 2.7 MGD is sized to serve an estimated 13,100 existing equivalent dwelling units (EDU) with some allowance for reasonable growth to be anticipated through the year 2010; and, Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners believes that its residential permit allocation system, moratoria on non-residential and transient residential development, and stringent environmental and development regulations will limit new growth and development within the Key Largo service area consistent with its Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan; and, Whereas, the capacity of the proposed Key Largo wastewater treatment facility and collection system is sized to limit potential for new development within the service area consistent with the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan policies and land development regulations; and, Whereas, that although Board of County Commissioners recognizes that County growth management and environmental policies and regulations and the limitations on the design of the proposed wastewater treatment facility system limit the potential for promoting undesirable growth beyond the carrying capacity of the Keys natural and man-made systems, the Board still has concerns about growth pressures due to the amount of developable land in private ownership within the proposed service area, much of which is environmentally sensitive; and, Whereas, over 5,000 privately owned vacant parcels valued at over $90 million based on the property tax records lie within the wastewater -'service area; and, Whereas, the service area contains lands of value due to naturally occurring native habitats, habitats of endangered or threatened species, flood hazard mitigation, historic and geological significance, passive recreation, and conservation and open space; and, C:\document\growthresoll.doc Page 1 of 3 Whereas, Objective 102.4 of the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan requires the establishment of a Natural Heritage and Park Program for the acquisition and management of the aforementioned lands; and, Whereas, the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan does not adequately address land use and built environment issues within the service area related to the intensity, density, and spatial distribution of growth and development; and, Whereas, the Monroe County Planning Department's CommuniKeys Program has been established to address these aforementioned issues by developing specific community master plans for the diverse islands that make up Monroe County; Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners recognizes that the community master planning and land acquisition and management programs supported by a sufficient level of funding should be implemented in parallel with the development of the Key Largo Wastewater System to ensure the provision of regional central sewer service is compatible with the built and natural environment; Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners is fully committed to ensuring that the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment System does not promote or induce growth and development in the Key Largo service area incompatible with the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan or exceeding what can reasonably be anticipated over the next 15 years through the County's permit allocation system, as amended by updates to the Hurricane Evacuation Study and findings of the Keys Carrying Capacity Study; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: The County Growth Management Division staff _%M prepare and complete, by no later than July 2002, a community master plan for the Key Largo service area, as part of the Planning Department's CommuniKeys Program, including an implementation action plan, that establishes specific development policies and standards for managing growth and development consistent with the capacity of the County's built and natural environments; and, The County Growth Management Division prepare for consideration by the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners by December 2002, specific land development regulations, changes in non- residential and residential permit allocation system, and other regulatory, tax and market incentives to effectuate the community master plan for Key Largo; and, The Monroe County Land Authority be requested in coordination with the County Growth Management Division to establish a Land Acquisition and Management Program by December 2002, as partial fulfillment of Objective 102.4 of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan, in order to assist in the implementation of community master land use plan for Key Largo and to acquire and manage lands that have: naturally occurring and native CAdocumentlgrowthresol1.doc Page 2 of 3 habitats; critical habitats for endangered or threatened species or species of special concern; unique geologic features; features of historic or archaeological significance; value for conservation and green/open space purposes; value for passive recreation uses; and private development rights that need to be acquired partially or in fee simple consistent with the community master plan; and, The Land Acquisition and Management Program be funded from bond proceeds by pledging one million dollars ($1,000,000) of the County's sales tax infrastructure revenue beginning in fiscal year 2004 through fiscal year 2014. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners, Monroe County, Florida at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 18'h day of May, 2000. (SEAL) Danny L. Kolhage, Clerk 9 Deputy Clerk Mayor Shirley Freeman Commissioner George Neugent Commissioner Wilhelmina Harvey Commissioner Mary Kay Reich Commissioner Nora Williams BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA z Mayor/Chairperson "PROVED AS TO FORM JLEG SUFFICIENCY BY T - Attomey's Office C:\document\growthresoll.doc Page 3 of 3 Assessment of Multiple Potential Sites For A Wastewater Treatment Plant in Key Largo 4 0 4 8 Miles Monroe County Dept. of Marine Resources Introduction A site is required to construct a treatment plant for the Key Largo Wastewater District. The minimum buildable area of the site must be approximately seven (7) acres. County staff has reviewed fifteen sites in the Key Largo area and two additional sites in North Key Largo for the placement of the needed wastewater treatment facility. This review has been completed in parallel with the on -going contract negotiations between the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority and the firm of Ogden Water Systems for the construction and operation of a wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system to serve all of the Key Largo area (MM 91 — MM 106) . A primary and secondary site is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners as the location of the wastewater treatment plant for the project. Should a contract with Ogden Water Systems be approved, the Board will need to direct the Land Authority to begin negotiations for purchase of the primary site. Background The Board of Commissioners (BOCC) supported a Request for Proposals (RFP) to complete a wastewater facility in the Key Largo area. The RFP allowed either a design -build or a design -build -operate approach focusing on a specific, defined area at approximately mile marker 106 (Lake Surprise Estates/Sexton Cove). It also allowed a broader project area if the responding firm could provide a proposal, which made a larger area more feasible, principally on a cost/benefit basis. During the course of the fall and early winter, a Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) made up of multiple agency personnel, most with extensive wastewater and finance experience, reviewed seven proposals provided by four firms. The TEP met a number of times to review proposals, to ask specific questions of submitting firms, and consider any and all concerns that they had relating to general issues and specific deficiencies in any of the proposals. The TEP made a recommendation to the BOCC that they select Ogden Water Systems if it was their desire to see a large-scale facility. Otherwise, the TEP suggested the firm of Daniels Contracting Company/CPH Engineers. The teams had provided very different proposals, Ogden — a design/build/operate facility encompassing all of Key Largo and Daniels — a design/build facility encompassing the area of Lake surprise Estates/Sexton Cove located near Mile Marker 106. 1 In February, the BOCC accepted the proposal from Ogden Water Systems to construct and operate a wastewater facility for all of Key Largo (MM 91 — MM 106). They also requested that the FKAA begin contract negotiations with Ogden Water Systems to construct and operate the project. A major issue concerning the development of the Key Largo Wastewater District project is the selection of a wastewater treatment plant site. Over the course of the past several months, County staff has been looking at as many as 15 different sites as possible locations for the plant. The public proposed many of the sites. A number of meetings have taken place where discussion of potential sites has been provided. The following written assessment culminates in a recommendation of two principal sites, a primary site and a secondary site. Site Selection Criteria Threshold criteria required that a candidate site be large enough to accommodate the necessary facility, not he in a C.A.R.L. (Conservation and Recreational Lands) or Co.B.R.A. (Coastal Barrier Resources Act) area, not lie in a FEMA V zone, and that did not have significant native habitat or serve as the habitat for an endangered species. Beyond the threshold criteria, sites were ranked for public acceptance, land use characteristics, potential adverse environmental impacts, and cost. The proposed site for the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant must have enough area that under the constraints of the County Code, there would be seven (7) buildable acres. In the case of a parcel with hardwood hammock the site would need to be at least 35 acres to meet the 80 percent open space requirements. In the case of a cleared parcel, the site would have to be at least 8.75 acres to meet a 20 percent open space requirement. Initially, County staff began by assessing a limited number of two sites, which were provided as part of the Wastewater Master Plan site selection review. The criteria developed in the Wastewater Master Plan were very stringent, designed to avoid any acquisition, permitting, or construction design problems as a wastewater project proceeded. In Key Largo, applying these criteria left few available sites. Those included a site at Mile Marker 92.4 — "Florida Rock and Sand" and a site at Mile marker 101 — "Calusa Cove Camp Ground." As staff brought these potential sites to the attention of the public, many more sites were suggested. Staff understood that not all of these sites would meet even the minimum acreage requirements. However, staff agreed to review these as well. Many sites could not be supported at all, either they were too small, were entirely vegetated with mangroves, or were already in C.A.R.L. ownership. 2 Site Assessments All Sites Staff reviewed, fifteen potential wastewater treatment plant sites within the Key Largo area. Two additional sites were reviewed in North Key Largo. A list and general description of site costs and characteristics is provided in Table 1, following this review. Map 1 provides a graphic identification of the location of each site. Maps 2 a-c through 5 provides graphic descriptions of the preferred sites. Site No. 1 — MM 92.4 Oceanside This site is located at Mile Marker 92.4, Oceanside and is owned by Florida Rock and Sand. It consists of approximately 13.43 acres of upland and 6.57 acres of wetlands. See Map 1, Map 4a-c, and Table 1. The site is large enough to accommodate the construction of the wastewater treatment plant for Key Largo. Three contiguous subdivisions, Blue Water Trailer Village, Sherril Park, and Tavernier Ocean Shores also surround the site. Public acceptance of the site is a significant issue. The site could accommodate the project if adequate buffering from adjacent uses were provided on site. Site No. 2 — 93.8 MM Oceanside This site is an accumulation of two parcels owned by the Belcher family, which are currently on the State C.A.R.L. acquisition list as part of the Dove Creek Acquisition project. See Map 1 and Table 1. Though the site is reasonable well buffered from other uses, the site would not allow enough clearing under current County land use constraints (80 percent open space) to provide sufficient acreage for the project. For these reasons, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 3 — MM 94.2 Oceanside This site is an accumulation of two parcels, which are currently in state ownership as part of the C.A.R.L. Dove Creek Acquisition project. See Map 1 and Table 1. 3 Though the site is reasonable well buffered form other uses, the site would not allow enough clearing under current County land use constraints (80 percent open space) to provide sufficient acreage for the project. For these reasons, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 4 — MM 95.2 Oceanside The site is an accumulation of three parcels owned by three different individuals. See Map 1 and Table 1. To the north and south he two subdivisions Sunrise Point and Lime Grove Estates. The sites provides marginally enough buildable area for the Key Largo wastewater treatment plant and no potential for buffering the project from adjacent land uses. For these reasons, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 5 — MM 95.5 Oceanside The site is an aggregation of four properties with four owners. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site is not sufficient in size to accommodate the needs for the project. For these reasons, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 6 — MM 98 Oceanside The site is an accumulation of four contiguous properties owned by three parties and is located at approximately mile marker 98 in Key Largo. There is currently no development on three of the four parcels. A marina lies on one of the middle two parcels. See Map 1, Map 2 a-c, and Table 1. The site has sufficient area to accommodate the placement of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. The surrounding uses include two improved subdivisions to the northeast (Rock Harbor Estates) and southwest (Mandalay Subdivision). Commercially zoned properties and uses exist in the U.S. Highway 1 median on either side of vacant properties immediately across the north bound land of U.S. 1 from the site. All surrounding uses could be adequately buffered from the development of a wastewater treatment plant at this location. The site could accommodate the project if adequate buffering were left intact between the project area and adjacent uses. 4 Site No. 7 — MM 100.5 Oceanside The site is located on the oceanside of U.S. 1 north of Waldorf Plaza and south of the Tradewinds Shopping Center. Across the highway is Key Largo Park subdivision. See Map 1, Map 3a-c, and Tables 1 and 2. The site is characterized by hardwood hammock. Surrounding the site are other parcels in State or County ownership which, provide ample buffering from adjacent uses. On the immediate south corner of the property along U.S. 1 is a Florida Keys Aqueduct facility. In addition there are several other public and private light industrial uses. On the north corner of the property lies a State owned parcel. The site is an excellent selection, though clearing constraints under the current County code would constrain clearing on the site. It is possible to aggregate several of the County's existing properties to the east of the site and purchase several additional vacant adjacent properties, while abandoning several intervening roads to accommodate the needs of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. This could require a Chapter 380 agreement with the Department of Community Affairs if all the parcels associated with the site were not contiguous. Site No. 8 MM 100.5 Oceanside The site is an aggregation of three parcels owned by three different entities, including the State of Florida. See Map 1 and Table 1. Though the site could marginally accommodate the project, one of the parcels is owned by the State as part of the Newport Hammocks C.A.R.L. acquisition project. Without the State parcel the combined sites are not large enough to accommodate the needs for the Key Largo wastewater treatment plant. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project Site No. 9 — MM 101 Oceanside The site is an aggregation of two parcels owned by two different entities, including the State of Florida. See Map 1 and Table 1. Though the site could marginally accommodate the project, one of the parcels is owned by the State as part of the Newport Hammocks C.A.R.L. acquisition 5 project. Without the State parcel the combined sites are not large enough to accommodate the needs for the Key Largo wastewater treatment plant. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 10 — MM 100 Ba, sy ide The site (Calusa Cove Campground) is located at Mile Marker 101, Bayside. It is owned principally by George W. Eager; however, the owner is currently selling condominium RV campground lots within the development to other parties. The total site consists of approximately 2 7.5 acres of uplands and is zoned Recreational Vehicle. See Map 1 and Table 1. The property has approximately 5 70 RV and campground sites, numerous accessory buildings and uses, and a marina. A significant portion of the RV and campground sites has been placed into condominium ownership (200 units plus). This makes the acquisition effort difficult if not impossible within any reasonable time frame. In addition, there are adjacent subdivisions to the north and south (Sunset Waterways and Key Largo Trailer Village) which would need to be buffered from the . For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 11 — MM 101.2 Oceanside This site is a single parcel located just to the north of the Tradewinds Shopping Center. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site is entirely a hammock parcel and the total acreage of the site would not allow enough clearing under current County land use constraints (80 percent open space) to provide enough acreage for the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant project. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 12 — MM 102.2 Bayside This site is in single ownership on the bayside near Twin Lakes Subdivision and across from Winston Waterways and Pamela Villa subdivisions. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site consists of a mix of habitats and does not contain enough upland acreage to allow adequate clearing under current County land use constraints (80 C. percent open space) . Thus, there would not be enough buildable acreage on the site to accommodate the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plan. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 13 — MM 104 Oceanside This site is located on the oceanside of U.S. 1 adjacent Largo Sound Village and Largo Sound Park. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site is largely cleared, but still does not provide enough total acreage to allow enough clearing under current County land use constraints (20 percent open space) to be able to accommodate the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant project. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 14 — MM 105.4 Bayside The site is in single ownership lying on the bayside of U.S. 1. The site is adjacent to Stillright Point and Paradise Point subdivisions. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site is vegetated entirely with mangroves. For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. Site No. 15 — MM 105.8 Oceanside This site is and accumulation of parcels owned by the Albury family. It is currently developed as a campground and is adjacent to Moreno's subdivision to the south and Lake Surprise Estates and Sexton Cove subdivisions across U.S. 1. See Map 1 and Table 1. The site consists of some hammock with campground sites interspersed. Though the site is well buffered from adjacent uses, it may not provide sufficient buildable acreage to accommodate the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant (7 buildable acres) . For this reason, this site was not deemed as an acceptable site for the project. 7 Sites in North Key Largo Although not initially considered, two sites in North Key Largo were reviewed separately based on input from the public forums on the issue. The principal reason that sites were not considered in the North Key Largo area (State Road 905) is that 2010 Comprehensive Plan policies require a stringent assessment of capital facilities need in the North Key largo area before the County commits capital infrastructure dollars to the area (Objective 103.2 and Policies 103.2.1 through 103.2.14). The basis for this required assessment is for protection of several endangered species (and their habitat) located almost exclusively in North Key Largo. Port Bougainville. The County has reviewed the Port Bougainville site. It is currently owned by the State of Florida as part of the North Key Largo Hammocks project and as buffer lands for john Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park. It is a large property with some extensive disturbance. The site is located approximately a one half mile up State Road 905 from the intersection of SR 905 and U.S. 1. See Map 5 and Table 1. This site was suggested by many members of the public as an appropriate to place the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant and to remove the publicly objectionable aspects of a wastewater from nearby neighborhoods. The site is generally isolated from other development. Though the Commission may choose to pursue the possibility of using this site with the State it has been assumed that the likelihood of acquiring access to the site is limited because of the public purpose for which it was purchased, conservation. Any approval for use of the site would have to be reviewed through the C.A.R.L. program and it's A.R.C. Committee. Approval of the Governor and Cabinet would probably also be required. Key Largo Landfill and Waste Transfer site County staff generally assessed the feasibility of using the County's landfill and waste transfer site on S R 905. This site is located approximately 7.5 miles up State Road 905 from the intersection of SR 905 and U.S. 1. Generally the use of this site was not seen as appropriate for two reasons. First virtually the entire site has been used as a landfill. It would be impractical to locate a wastewater treatment plant on the landfill for both technical and environmental reasons. It would also be impractical to mine the landfill in order to remove it. It was also seen as very cost ineffective to extend almost 7.5 miles of pipe up SR 905 to this site. There would be very little returned revenue along this stretch of road to offset the significant cost. Preferred Sites Of the fifteen sites reviewed three would be acceptable alternatives for the placement of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. As noted above, most would not be of sufficient size to accommodate the project. Others had environmental constraints such as the existence of nothing but mangroves on the property. All sites located in the Key Largo area (MM 91 to 106) have raised some level of public concern, including each of the remaining options. However, in each case staff feels that odor control measures and abundant site buffering will eliminate these concerns in reality. Based on staff review, three sites are legitimate candidates for the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. They are described in ranked order below. Preferred Site No. 1, Ettinger, Rop-er's Marina MM 98 0 The site is an aggregation of four contiguous properties owned by three parties and is located at approximately mile marker 98 in Key Largo. There is currently no development on three of the four parcels. A marina lies on one of the middle two parcels. The combined acreage of the four parcels is 13.23 acres. Taking into account, allowed vegetation clearing ratios (as two of the properties have hardwood hammock on them) and typical property line and wetland setbacks, the properties provide 7.75 developable acres. The combined assessed values for the four properties is $894,972. If the property were to be purchased at its tax value, it would cost between $61 and $73 per EDU. The properties are zoned SR and NA which, properly buffered from surrounding uses, allows public uses within the district. The surrounding uses include two improved subdivisions to the northeast (Rock Harbor Estates) and southwest (Mandalay Subdivision) . Commercially zoned properties and uses exist in the U.S. Highway 1 median on either side of vacant properties immediately across the north bound land of U.S. 1 from the site. All surrounding uses could be adequately buffered from the development of a wastewater treatment plant at this location. Maximally using the four properties, more than 100 feet of hammock buffer could be provided between the project and Mandalay subdivision. Two properties in excess of 15 acres in size exist between the project and Rock harbor Estates. These two properties are largely undisturbed, containing about 11.5 acres of hardwood hammock. They are also currently under contract with the Conservation and Recreational Lands program (C.A.R.L.) . As such, these properties would buffer Rock Harbor Estates from the project in perpetuity. The northeastern -most of the four properties composing this site has significant hammock disturbance, enough to allow considerable clearing under the County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. The next two properties to the southwest contain a marina and generally cleared lands. Aside from setback and "floor area" constraints, these properties could largely be developed for the project. The hammock area of the fourth parcel is estimated to be low quality hammock. This would allow up to 1.64 acres of clearing within the overall 3.86 acre area of the parcel. Table 1 identifies this site as Site No. 6 and provides a general description of the site habitat characteristics, potential buildable area, and cost (based on total assessed value). Maps 2 a through 2c, similarly provide an aerial view of the site, a graphic view of the habitat on the site, and a graphic view of neighboring subdivisions. The site has adequate size to accommodate the Key largo Wastewater Treatment Plant while still providing enough native habitat (required to remain by County Land Development Regulations) to provide visual, olfactory, and aesthetic buffering from adjacent subdivisions to the south. The site also lies near the two C.A.R.L. acquisition properties to the north, which total approximately 15 acres and have approximately 600 front footage along U.S. 1. These properties would provide substantial buffering to subdivisions to the north. In addition the project could be completed generally within all other constraints of the County Land Development Regulations. Preferred Site No. 2 — Schonin er Properties et al., MM 100.5 The site is located on the oceanside of U.S. 1 north of Waldorf Plaza and south of the Tradewinds Shopping Center. Across the highway is Key Largo Park subdivision. The assessed tax value of the site, is approximately $252,287. This includes properties that the plant will be located on and those that would be required to provide sufficient additional acreage to accommodate the open space requirements for the site (80 percent). If the property were to be purchased at its tax value, it would cost $21 per EDU. The site is characterized completely by hardwood hammock. Surrounding the site are other parcels in State or County ownership which, provide ample buffering from adjacent uses. On the immediate southern corner of the property along U.S. 1 is a Florida Keys Aqueduct facility. In addition there are several other public and private light industrial uses in that area. On the north corner of the property lies a State owned parcel, a part of the Newport Hammocks C.A.R.L. acquisition project. To the east toward the ocean are a number of private properties, including the Key Largo Gun Club, Carter's waste handling facility, a private juvenile facility, and two or three private residences. The character of the area toward the ocean is one of rural or native character and little development. The site is an excellent selection, though clearing limitations under the current County code (80 percent open space) would constrain clearing on the site. It is possible to aggregate several of the County's existing properties in the surrounding area to the east of the site and purchase several additional vacant privately owned adjacent properties, while de -dedicating several intervening roads. However, it would require the purchase of as many as 15 properties in order to accommodate the needed buildable area requirements for the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant (7 buildable acres). The purchase could be somewhat time consuming. The principal sites, adjacent County properties and adjacent private vacant properties are depicted in Table 1 as Site No. 7 (Schoninger properties only) and in Table 2. Table 2 provides a list of surrounding county and private vacant land which may be required to accommodate the open space requirements on the properties where the Key Largo Treatment Plant would be located, Schoninger Properties. Maps 3 a through 3c provide an aerial view of the site, a graphic depiction of the habitat on the site, and identifies the surrounding subdivisions. Unique about these maps is the depiction of surrounding County and private vacant parcels, which would be necessary to make this parcel complete in order to have enough buildable area to accommodate the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant If in the long run not all of the Chapter 380 agreement may be Affairs to finalize the acquisition constraints on the project. properties purchased were contiguous then a required with the Department of Community process. This could also place significant time 11 Using adjacent county properties and several additional properties in addition to the principal parcels, the site has adequate size to accommodate the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. The site would also provide enough native habitat (required to remain by County Land Development Regulations) to provide visual, olfactory, and aesthetic buffering from adjacent subdivisions to the south. The site lies near one large 18-acre C.A.R.L. property to the north of this site. These properties and the general character of surrounding land uses would provide substantial buffering to all other uses and nearby residential subdivisions. The site is also contiguous with an existing FKAA facility, which would allow better management of FKAA projects generally. In addition the project could be completed generally within all other constraints of the County Land Development Regulations, except for the lack of sufficient contiguous acreage to accommodate clearing of the hammock. Preferred Site No 3, Florida Rock and Sand, MM 92. The site is located at Mile Marker 92.4, Oceanside. It consists of approximately 13.43 acres of upland and 6.57 acres of wetlands. It is zoned Suburban Commercial. Owned by Florida Rock and Sand, the site has several structures and is currently used as a concrete batching plant, which covers approximately 70 percent of the upland area. Except for the mangrove wetlands, the site has no critical environmental features and no recognized habitat for any listed endangered or threatened species. The assessed tax value of the property is approximately $6 74,000, of which $538,000 is land. If the property were to be purchased at its tax value, it would cost $55 per EDU. The site is surrounded on the north and east by Urban Residential Mobile Home zoning and the south by Improved Subdivision. The surrounding existing uses are mostly mobile homes and trailers on the north and east (Sherrill Park and Blue Water Trailer Village) and single family homes (Tavernier Ocean Shores) on the south. The remainder of the property abuts U.S. Highway 1 on the west, which is commercially zoned. Table 1 identifies this site as Site No. 1 and provides a general description of the site habitat characteristics, potential buildable area, and cost (based on total assessed value). Maps 4a through 4c, similarly provide an aerial view of the site, a graphic view of the habitat on the site, and a graphic view of neighboring subdivisions. 12 Staff recommends this site as Preferred Site No 3. This site has the advantage of having significant disturbed area on the property to accommodate the size of the Key Largo Treatment Plant requirements (7 buildable acres). It also provides enough area that a significant buffer could be provided on -site between the wastewater facility and adjacent uses. In addition the project could be completed generally within all other constraints of the County Land Development Regulations. The significant downside to the selection of this site is the fact the public acceptance of the site will be low because of the proximity of three contiguous subdivisions. Considering the overall appropriateness of the site, as seen by itself, it is the public acceptance issue which devalues the site for placement of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. Recommendations Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the following sites as its first and second choices for the location of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant. These are: Preferred Site No. 1, Ettinger, Roger's Marina, Hag-zai MM 98.0 Preferred Site No. 2 — Schonin eR r Properties et al., MM 100.5 Should the BOCC agree to continue negotiations with Ogden Water Systems and sign a contract with that firm, it should request the Monroe County Land Authority to begin immediate negotiations with the property owners identified as part of the two preferred sites Additional options should continue to be considered for the possibility of using Port Bougainville as a potential site. Staff believes that the likelihood of being able to use the site is minimal. However, the C.A.R.L. program has a mechanism that we may use to make this determination. Map 5 provides an aerial view of this area. 13 Site Pros and Cons Preferred Site No.1. Ettinger/Roger's Marina/Haggai, MM 98.0. Pros Cons • Vacant site — three of four properties • Moderate acquisition costs • No significant surrounding land uses that can't be buffered from the project • Not on a State acquisition list • Working marina on one of four parcels • Multiple ownership — three owners • Some hammock area • Identified site for federally listed endangered or threatened species. Preferred Site No 2, Schoninger Proaerties et al., MM 100.5. Pros • Large vacant property • Low to moderate acquisition costs • No significant surrounding land uses that can't be buffered from the project Cons • Almost entirely hammock property • Up to 15 properties may need to be acquired as part of obtaining a large enough buildable area for clearing • The possibility exists that a Chapter 380 agreement would be required if all of the properties purchased were not contiguous • On the C.A.R.L. acquisition list — Newport Hammocks • Endangered Species Expected on site Preferred Site No 3, Florida Rock and Sand, MM 92. Pros Cons • More than adequate clear/disturbed acreage (13.4 acres) • Not on a State acquisition list • No federal listed endangered or threatened species • Non -residentially zoned • Visual buffering from adjacent uses due to presence of vegetation on perimeter of property. • Nearby residential land use -Blue Water Trailer Village/Sherrill Park • Possible high acquisition and site preparation costs due to existing use and previous disposal of concrete on site 14 Map 1 Key Largo — All Potential Wastewater Treatment Plant Sites 15 Maps 2a through 2c Preferred Site No. 1 - Ettinger/Roper's Marina/Hague, MM 98.0. 16 w o a N O 0 • � O Z po 4� M � � O 4-4 as O M 6 W L YI m Y YI �Se a a co Sul �� i �oajjj Mwss moll di 3 III 0 0 o Cd,...,. M C L r � N t0 22 Z O 4 = U) V7 O 2-0 1 C L � O 0) � Ja 0 Y t • ., .�,' >'�, ro r a lam" may. lash,♦ 1 • � F ' . � Y�• a F J. �� % iY k s r...uir ' 1 • ° e • • 1+3Rk ��1 _=9• {IYIYiIfY�ifL� �cjY�¢,,.�G "# 3ed $ � 1 rc4' 79°a'� Ali 4'� � '�` �, �f �&r ,'�Y }� • y t ^ 4 �� 1 & w so ^ 't .k Maps 3a through 3c Preferred Site No 2, Schonin er Properties et al., MM 100.5. 17 W m Z ; 1 �3s � L x r E w i I E F w • OOGEJ M IN gill III _W 5� W O . A • Y : O O V � L N Y O O LZ cc 4) '— M •— O i � cm� L O .a a� �C o 0 0 W O J �m> �A >_ N N � 4) r- cn in a U) a` Z 0 m - CC_ " ` E cm e— N's �j = a� CO) C m � �' o 2) L. Z _ > c J 14 to C) 0 O 4) ''AA CO) O .� 13 1 O4) L N Ja o 4 � o 0 a 2) o cu J a N Maps 4a through 4c Preferred Site No 3, Florida Rock and Sand, MM 92 W a �L 1 Ic��,����JS3 IL a ab��a 3 .00211 'MIN 1111 111 Cam_ G N N O� M pp �C C O m Z � t0 � L � � � O y- J a N 0 Y o N O m cc c c N O J 'a 'M . zC4 CL a cn C. a� rn N a CV O • � N U p Eco ca CV a L O cw Z 3 ca W t0 G� m CO O L N U 1 L O o OLM L m a cc ~ N J o � o � E C � 2 Q N c W � c z 0 m 0 a (D M N N N pow pow Poo I �0. Lq Q � pm QM ci O O U) C Table 1 Information Concerning All Sites Reviewed 20 I W C W A W N O m W V 0) CT A W N m 3 3 p oo A N O O O p O p S t(On I �p A S N OI GD V1 A O N N O O W til O ,p CT IU N OD O p p WW p p Ap��� W W AAA m m OWWf W W W V W W co jpj W W W V V (D (D OW0�010wi m (pO O0f1 (D (D EAAD QQ�jj y CWW.10p0 W �ppp tD C pAp 0 WA 0 0 0 O p O Wy O O WN O {gipp O S O S O �0p O S S O O O 0 0 0 (�N�D 0 0 0 0 O O O S S (�p� O O ((App O m �888 SSS SS 88 8 " 8888 1088E S S S 8 O pS O S S SWSWS St6'8 SWS8 SOS SNS OO 888888 8�0888 8888 SSS SS SS 8 0000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 010 00 O 3 3 c 0 ° aaDD 0 T 0 W �r1 D 7C 7C 217-1 mom mW 00 D r 2rvm D � -� 9m 0 G)A r'00 W W vv W 7CW m r m 3 c 9 mFarmF. zzzc fn -4 T z � 7C � m �W� z pp xx OoG� DND � Gymf�1 z o C�9m �7� mmm zWW OTOT z� z= � 3 m 3 3 DD b -i <d<-< W A m A 1 A G) 7C11 D000 r4i�>3y r-i (a zz A�r-70 mNT G) r rZ ZrC pv 11 Wm Z�11 D W W s G)G) mm r c v z 0 mm xW mW� G)G) mmyZap OZpm ZL C 00 0m �i td �_ c 00 M M-8 mmo Z�Z�'���zZ ag G)� m m � m m �vo0 vji mm z w n D x D N m ASS ` 4 xx Q vvTDZ rr- z ,= (�az W m °" �� AA {A Gi �W m W cT ss mmgA D 0 °° 00 �= a: W (aW i (1 Z m�� WO ZZ fa fa CQ' 0 O TT AQO v m °� fA(»sA W p00 m c 22 a>A 00 z n m-i mx 00 m2n zzr c>n9 AL mm m 11 m sPh nA d z m < m 0 i a uxi vmi z = vv m 3 Xo 4 X H a W W W W W H rNN�Nf.H.1HH HHHH NN H W W + + HCq W V H W (0 10 H�H -4 H OV�cAApp W ®NV (pP�1 0OVW(O� OOD V W01 �qH OWA �p AV 0V1 �q W WW WWA p _ mID mSH W O<O WW lAA N��D N�ppVA NOfpWA N0 WWA _A1 -0 NCWG� W pp00 N N 00 W O 01 SW O01 O W CA A� W V V NOV OWN V AO W A O00 A W WOOI NN0 OWO Nf71N� 000 W AID W W a D n mmXO �WJJJ pNp!mmX1 W 'ppVA N i3 Is NNOOQp � jS � �(VO N p1 W !pWN7 �OA p(�A71 0Wf1 OWCOpW (WWWOWA1 (N� 0 GV11 W WW4 jV WWpV N vN (AC r WC0� O 808 NW �(pAp W(v� F, IM0v �II W (711 A NNS p p N (yV(SE� WV A W NA W C D %N N O p tpAD W vAV Of o0 S fN71 0 80 W W O W ON0C�o1 O1 v oWI Q�App AOD WWW O Of A VN1 fT-�+p (gi(0pp W (N� Npp N(qA� (0Wp1N O! W !O m j(DI W 0 O A O V A W W J C T V A (VD WV W (SO N OWVD S W N o A N 0 A m A N O tl3 3 m 3 W d1 J O O O O O O O O 91 O Ap 0 0 O O O O O A -c�p O O O p Op ((OpD N ( Pp, -+ O O O m WV ((A 6 D S S A tQ /i 1 A pW $ S p O °D 8 N S S S S S A A p a 8 W NW W D I S r® A S S S POOP o 0 o P o PPP P00 PP OOPPOP O000 oPo oP oo N k x SSSS S S S S S SSS SSS SSS 888888 SSSS SSS SS SS 8 o x A N 3 NO 3 --O) O 0 O N O OO Olpl!- NN 00 V 0 W O Wpp D0W)�cWp O S N 'pmli�VS DO 1. CD WR9$ 0SNNN i 8� ¢ S IP O OSOOS OS Oolpi OOO O OO Pipip P PPPO OOP O O A N 888 18818 ai W S EN CAS d j 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O m O O O O O O O O 8 O O O pO O O O O O 0 0 000 0 0 o O S S O N O O O O O 000 (A O O O O m O O P ONI O U O 71 A O W O O N 0 0 0 P:,:- O O P O1 O 0 0 0 O f ND1 f O N A O SSSS S A S ONN mSvSS 888 ipNN SS W N (W71A W SSS CAV owl 1A m i 00PP P O A P 0 0W0 O00 OOP 0POP00 oPPP 000 Po 00 0 a 0000 O CD O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0K)0 O W O 000 0 0 0 000 000 000000 O O O O O O 0000 0000 08o 0 0 00 O O o0 O O 0 0 m Q m c IF D� O OP WW .WWA O O O A A W.N 0,NO.((,,��! S Ov. W A. A W O W.pp W .pppp.�cp.poy. .0 .N IV C. W W O W CT W 1:4 .App .WWA W SS 0 ..0) W'CIA . WvSpp WWWWN W O�0V1N� Sp SW000DD -4 ( _ID NW yy A A m 7 3 3 W c N O:+O O O O O O N N �� N N O O N AO W N W W A W O W MW--W --+O W O O O— W NN W N N 0 �O 6 IJ W W 00 0 jW W O O N W W W r IV D O O N O jNW W V 0 0 �lP W A W W 00 N VV V V D 0D W A CTOO W N WVOT D Of TA V W N V WO W CA co 3 3 3 W c AON 00 Cp)1 O1 NO�p O) D10N W ONo V A W 01�CNC77��NW —NN _ O— _ V NNW co WO Npp— _ m 6 v WttA WOWO W W SS W W A A WNW W Ol WOW W W WSA CW71A W O W �O(pp N? NNV WO A�v(OW WWA fO NOOK W CN1100))N-4 v VS pNp (0 CD V �S m O d_ v A N.N. W W(O NA 0" aWW WmNV A W W N 8 0 �Vv W W. NAAN O 0P. W W DDO mm AAWA .A m .NVA W W OWAN V . . J CO . W O S_WNpWS�O .W. . 0 . . (DmAOi . NA . . . VOVWWNNWJ W.I0 ..N. . V v C7 W W m (a r m T 2 T WW—�tn� -0-0 xx 0((aW0r to DW fa (A coca z Z m ei 3 3 am m < m m m m 3 ' =m m m m m m — m m 3 < (D m�WrW �.a m��3 m m 0 m 3zz r C mAb'' m� m'3m� ¢ y 3 0 { WWO �3,o w m W m m WW W� �g� 0D 41 ={=i3�gx TT� . �Z �n CD COca m :-IQ 3T 3n v�� E Z 3 TT Q 3 3 � � �_ m T T T T m C 3 _ a m 3 3 8 O N N' m m S > > m m W W 9- 0 m a 1 (b 0 00 mo olJSt .�.. m 3 < m mr m m .. =m �_� ? z ° m px m —� m m — w m —$ c o 2 m nD r� mm o xxM' 33m Wa° m S 33 u3 �� m� m� d 08 z m m m — O 4 Q � O W O O O CD 7 NC_ 03 ca W ID N 0) cr ID w m CD W Table 2 Information Concerning Properties Surrounding Preferred Site no. 2 21 87e' eOe2aeea�i:a'a88S�an "saaaeasss:� ^ 14 • N O O O C O O O O C O O C O G O C O O O C O O O O O O O O O 0 o 0 o. � IV Coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o C C O o 0 o o � � pp+ a ry�g8i77373H13 o i3��t3�8�7373 Li��a�k37373 Y7 k3 tig38$�Zi �i i32S if8$Zi 2i Z3dSaaaE35EaaEEEaRO N O. 0 0 o e e O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 o O C G o G O O o O o O C o O O o o e O o O o 0 o o o o o o o O o 0 0 o e o . S OOOO$OOS}:^ S � SSSS'S+$ASS SS�SSS' �g �su88�Q {q 1�yq 1�yq p �D t�yq R �` �Ns N 8 g � O O G O G O C o G O O G O C O O C O G G O C O 0 0 o G O C G G O O C O C o 0 0 G O 0 0 I e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O G O 0 0 0 0 C G C r F 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888885S888888888888888pQ8pQ888pQH88888888888888888885S8pQ8pq888888888888888888888888 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 8 3 0000 O O O O O O o e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O 8 O o 88 O O 8e 8e O O 8e 8O o O 8o 8o O O 8e 8e O O 8e 8e O O 8e 8e O O 8O 8O O O 8O 8e O O 8e 8e O O 8e 8O O O 8O RO O O 8e 8e O O 8O 8O O O 80 8o O O S0 8e O O d N. 8e 0 8O SO 0 0 8o 8e O O 8O 8o O O 8o S0 O O 8e 8e O O 8o 8e O O 8e 8O O O 808e O O 8e 8e O O 8e 8e O O 8O 8O O O 8O 8e O O 8e 8o O O 8o �qep O MI 8e y+0 O �0 O d Q0 Q0 ?RR?4RRR4R?O4H Q05o�Qo QO Qo Qo Q$d Qo S5d��Qo Q$o So��Qo Q$O Q$O QO URR Q$d Qo as?aaaaa33. QQO QQo yyu Qe Qo QQo QQo QQo QQo QQo iS,a3aaaSaaa33S2SXEaS3E S5dd}Qo�QQO Qo QQ-QN Sco Qo Qe yye yyo QQo So�Qo Qo Qo QQo Qe Qo Ro ESaSaSEaaSaSaaaE Qo QQo Qo QQe po QQo QQo Qo Qe QQe QQO QQe Qo SRoho RRo Sa - o o 0 o 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 00000000 C 00000000 0 0000000000000 0 0 0 ad-- O N e00000e000000ee00000ee0000ee0000000000000000eeee00000e0000000000e0000 gg0000aeoa�'�'8'aaaa'a�gg�aaaaeaaa'n ♦RR4444QQgg SSS�A Yy gg T'f s '1eo 0 o 0 o cddbdd O o 0 o Oo0 o e o O o eeo00 0 0 0 �7odddd0000ad6dd=00000. o o O o O o e e G O o o O o o C O Qe Qe RRo QQo Qo Qo Qe yo QQo Qo Qo Qe Qe QQo Qo Qo Qo pe Qo yo�QQo Qo QQo QQe Qe Qo Qo Qo S aESXSaOEaXESa3E QQo Qe Qo QQo Qo QQo QQo QQe QQo so QQo QQo po Qe Qe Qe 2SOaSaE753Sa3aaa7faE3aaE0a30aa QQo Qo QQo po Qe Qe Qe Qo Qo Qo QQo Qe Qe QQe Qo Qo QQo Qo Qo Qe QQe Qe Qe Qo QQo QQe a O o 000000000cc00000000ddddddo o e o G O o 0 o 0 0 0 o o G G o o e C C o 0 o e e O o o e o o o C o e e o o 0 o o o C o o o o o e o o o o o e o o 0 0 0 0 o O O O o e o U pp^o b' Roo^'aoo$oog�$�$$�giiZnn��Sg QQ +���T'1 yy ^ � g CCS5��ss yy g N Yg gQ I: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 04d6ddd000-.; 0 0.O O O O C O 0 0 r A A N .. N ^ h 0 $$xUaMBAgRAa N a N Ass»»xxxxxxxxx figs i JpOopipppppoQpoppppppppeppp III JJim 3p 3pep pioeOppeeeeZ V iijw* p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 883RRS8SR88�F�J�x��gxLL����o.'�!'.`'�7�`.'�`�2R SR V B��=R jQjSSgs,'��7jgy�ygS(}pg�QxR}Qs� O y O� eRR g Og O O O OgQ ii:3YNRoidBiSii�3i� OQ OQ O OQ OQ OS Og Os O OQQO I � iM I 3 Acquisition and Restoration Council (ARC) Staff Meeting Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. #140 Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building, Conference Room A Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Agenda Intoduction Eva Armstrong Director Division of State Lands CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING LAND MANAGEMENT ISSUES Item 1: Consider proposed use of state property in Monroe County for a sewage treatment facility DSL Staff Remarks: The Bureau of Public Land Administration (BPLA) has received a request from Monroe County to lease approximately 7 acres of the state-owned property known as Port Bougainville which is part of the North Key Largo Hammocks CARL project for use as a site to construct a wastewater, treatment, and disposal facility. Port Bougainville was purchased in 1988 with CARL funds and is currently managed by the Division of Recreation and Parks as part of the Key Largo Hammocks State Botanical Site. The Port Bougainville site contains 155 acres, 67 acres of which is highly disturbed, including structures, and impermeable surfaces. Wastewater is recognized as a significant source of nutrient pollution in the Keys' nearshore and confined waters. Subdivisions platted prior to 1972 in Florida utilized on -site waste water systems. On -Site waste water systems are wholly insufficient to serve the waste water needs of the Florida Keys and unfortunately, most of the Key Largo subdivisions were platted prior to 1972 resulting in a large number of cesspools in the area. In carrying out the Comprehensive Plan adopted by Monroe County and approved by the Governor and Cabinet, a Master Plan and Seven Year Work Plan were developed for managing waste water in the Keys. The Master Plan found that the development of a regional waster water facility to be by far the most cost effective method of handling wasterwater as well as making sense from a human health standpoint. Therefore, Monroe County began the search for a site for the Key Largo Waste Water Treatment Plant. Several sites were identified and evaluated by the Monroe County Commission. On May 18, 2000, the Commission voted the Port Bougainville site to be the number one preferred site and, therefore, are requesting the approval of the Council before proceeding to the Governor and Cabinet with the lease request. Included as back-up documentation to this item is information regarding the County's search and evaluation ARC Staff Meeting — May 22, 2000 of various sites for locating the waste water treatment plant as well as the anticipated method of waste disposal. Should the Council approve this request, DSL staff will negotiate special conditions of the lease with Monroe County which will include, but may not be limited to: lease fee; replacement lands; facility capacity; cap on expansion of the facility; and monitoring of the facility. Staff of the Botanical Site working with staff of the Florida Keys Environmental Restoration Trust Fund have been working for a couple of years planning and implementing restoration of the Port Bouganville site. Significant restoration has been accomplished and permit applications for restoration of the remainder of the site is planned to occur within the next year and funding is expected to be available for all or a large part of the remaining restoration next winter. The lease of the Port Bouganville property to Monroe County is being submitted to ARC and the Board of Trustees for approval as it is believed to be of significant public interest and due to its potential for controversy. ARC Staff Recommendation: OTHER ITEMS OR ISSUES Item 2: Overview of ARC Item 3: The Sunshine Law Item 4: Travel Item 5: The History of Florida's Land Acquisition Program Item 6: Acquisition Program Description Mark Glisson Office of Environmental Services Division of State Lands Myra Williams Director Division of Administrative Services Greg Brock Program Administrator Office of Environmental Services Division of State Lands Ed Kuester Chief Bureau of Land Acquisition Division of State Lands Page 2 of 3 ARC Staff Meeting — May 22, 2000 Item 7: Management Program Description Mark Glisson Office of Environmental Services Division of State Lands Page 3 of 3