Item C20
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: JUNE 14/15, 2000
DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BULK ITEM: YES
DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: APPROVAL TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP GENERAL AVIATION
HANGARS AT THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT, AND APPROVAL TO RE-ADVERTISE FOR SAME.
ITEM BACKGROUND: THREE PROPOSALS WERE SUBMITTED AND ARE ATTACHED.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: APPROVAL TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ON 12/8/99
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS AND RE-ADVERTISE. ALL THREE
PROPOSALS CALL FOR THE COUNTY TO DEVELOP THE SITE, AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE TO THE AIRPORT.
.if APPARENTLY THERE WAS A MISUNDERSTANDING BY THE RESPONDENTS CONCERNING THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
TOTAL COST: PHASE I $1,323,250 PHASE 2. $1,334,115
BUDGETED: N/A
COST TO COUNTY: POTENTIALLY NONE WITH PARTICIPATION FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND THE
FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
REVENUE PRODUCING: YES
AMOUNT PER MONTHNEAR:
SUBJECT TO
NEGOTIATION
APPROVED BY: County Attorney
OMB/Purchasing
Risk Management
DIRECTOR APPROVAL
rp -s t:r r3 Ctv-
Peter J. Horton
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
To Follow
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM # ~ ~')l)
DISPOSITION:
/pjh
APD
r
.....J
<(
0:::
W
ZV)
Ww
<.9<.9
u..w
0=
w>
Uo:::
za...
<(<.9
Zz
w-
~ V)
z<(
<(~
~~
00:::
ZW
.... <(~
~ ~<.9
~ ZZ
.... wO
0::: ~.....J
<(tu wo:::
D-Wo<.90
WIO<(u..
OV)ozw
~Z('.l<(<.9
zO.....:~z
-~~ <(
~<(.....J....:I
-.....J-ZU
x:::)o:::w
Ueoa...~x
<(<(..c::::w
~~ ..a...z
D-<.9~gh
>- z 0<( w 0:::
....- >0
ZZZWa...
:::)~wOo:::
OOa...~<(
uoOgz
W- ~O
Oeo o6I
0::: ~
Z ~<(
o &jo:::
~ ~~
V)~
~<(
Z~
.....J<(
<(<.9
~Z
a...<(
0I
~z
00
l.()i=
1<(
a... -
u..>
0:::<(
W
.....J
~
i=
~ t<) ~
0 " ~ ll-
w
> ')
w
U
W
0:::
.....J X X X
<(
V)
0
a...
0
0:::
a...
U
Z
-
(/)
0:::
0 U
~
U z z
>- <( -
U 0::: 0 ~
~ i= Z
Z Z <( W
W 0 U ~
(j U 0 a...
<( --l (/) 0
<( (/) --l
W
U <( >
0::: Z W
I- 0 0
U I- 0:::
W <( W
--l l')
W >
Z
Z <( <(
0 (/) :c
U >- Z
--l W
<( ::.L 0
u.. <( :c
0 0 I-
<(
0::: 0::: 0:::
0 0 <(
W --l ~
a... u..
"0
C
o
0..
Q)
0:::
Q)
U
t;::
.....
o
>-
Q)
C
L-
o
+-
~
>-
+-
C
::::>
o
U
I
C
o
vo
C
Q)
::.L
Q)
o
-.
...:
.....
o
+-
(/)
0)
C
.V:;
o
..c
U
L-
::::>
a...
I
vo
o
.~
0:::
o
C
.c
.0
o
(/)
"0
C
o
C
L-
Q)
..c
U
1nt
C 0
L- r\
Wt:-
o .-
vo<(
.- .....
~ 0
+- L-
C 0
~u
Q) Q)
L- L-
a... .-
Q)o
Q) I
+- C
:= 0
Et:
E 0
0:C
U(j)
-o+-
.- Q)
co a...
Q)
-g .~
~+-
U"O
Q) C
..c 0
U Q)
c+-
Q) 0
Q)"O
.0 Q)
Q):f
> >-
0.0
..c
Q)"O
> Q)
o .~
.oQ)
o U
-0 ~
2 ~
.!!:! Q)
~ 3
Q) Q)
"0 >
"0 0
.- .0
.00
0"0
+-Q)
Oin
..c =
+- vo
"0"0
c.-
0.0
0)<(
C
'c en
Q)O)
o..,~
oin
"0 .=
,- 0
.0"0
~C
o Q)
vI>
'0-0
>-Q)
0.."0
o C
U Q)
+-0..
U vo
Q)a
L-
006
u-o
-02
C U
0'>
Q) C
::::> 0
~u
o 0
.!!:! "0
Vl .c
:.c 0
+- u..
+- .....
o 0
..cQ)
+- +-
~E
+- (/)
(j) Q)
U..c .
>- +- -0
.0 in ,~
Q)C::
L- .- U
Q) 0 Q)
..c 0) 0..
_Ovo
Q)
.c:.
+-
L-
o
vo
.~
Q)
::::>
(/)
Q)
c
.~
Q)
+-
Q)
1)
o
+-
Vl
1)
:0
(;
~
Q)
.:;:
~
1)
c
o
Q)~
.S c
E Q)
o E
x ::;)
Q) U
o 0
+-1)
~1)
0'-
1).0
O)~
c .~
.- >
~ Q)
o '-
~ >-..
_0
~E
-u
c:.::::
Q).o
+- ::;)
VlQ
o Q)
.c:..c:.
Q)+-
0;>:.
'- 0
~1)
~:E
"- -
0-
>-..Q)
c:t:
::;) c
80
Q) ~
:t:Q)
~~
0.-
-1.0
o Q)
1):t:
. L:: "t-
o 0
i:i: Vl
o Vl
+-Q)
C
O>Q)
C >
=a .v;
'- c
o 0
UQ
U Vl
<( ~
C
'V:;
o
..c
U
L-
::::>
a...
L-
Q)
..c
U
+-
vo
C
L-
W
o
VI
::J
>-
co
"0
Q)
C
Q)
0..
o
-0
Cii
Pedro Falcon ProDosal
...
PHASES AND QUANTITIES
My proposal is based on the utilization of 50% private funds and 50% FDOT funding, leaning to
Option #2 as proposed by Monroe County. I believe this to be the best avenue available to assure
that these hangars will be cost affordable for the local pilots in this area. Option #3 is also open
as a second choice consideration, though I believe it would take much longer to develop.
Since I, Pedro Falcon, am looking for ways to make this project truly affordable to all pilots in
this area, and that, after a specific period of time, Monroe County will become owner of all the
improvements to be made, it is my recommendation that Monroe County provide some of the
infrastructure required for this project (including the fill, drainage, and paving), and the utilities,
water and electric, be supplied by the developer/FDOT. This is, however, an area that would be
open for negotiations if Pedro Falcon should be considered for future development of this
project.
Pedro Falcon is a contractor, having been established worked in Monroe County since 1984: I
have worked at various airports, including the Naval Air Station at Boca Chica, Key West,
Florida, installing distant markers, runway lights, removal of rubber, and the restriping and
resurfacing of the pavement. I am also a commercial pilot with instrument single and
multi-engine ratings, and have an instructors certificate. I have been flying since 1967, having
over 5,000 hours of flying time: I know and understand aviation and its needs.
The proposed layout, submitted by URS Greiner, appears to be located in an ideal area of the
airport for general aviation aircraft as Runway 7 is the most used runway due to the prevailing
winds: The location of these hangars, close to the end of this runway, will considerably
minimize the time needed on the taxiways and runways as the distance is minimal, and, with the
exception of jets and turbo props, most of general aviation airplanes require only one-third or
less of the runway during a take-off and landing, reducing the time on both taxiways and runways
to a minimum. Marathon Airport may not presently have a problem with air traffic congestion,
but airports should be considered as long-term site, and this consideration now may make a
difference in years to come.
After much consideration, I have decided to approach this project conservatively with a proposal
for a three phase plan. Local demand may reduce this to two phases, depending upon the needs,
and, if interest is greater than anticipated, more units can be added to a phase. The needs shall be
determined through local advertising in newspapers, FBO, and input from the airport manager
and the local aviation associations.
Phase I To include the installation and construction (possibly by Monroe County) of all
the necessary infrastructure, consisting of adequate drainage, utility services, and paving for
ingresslegress, and the erection of one (1) wash rack and thirteen (13) hangars; including eight
(8) enclosed T hangars (see section E plan layout) and five (5) shaded T hangars (see section C
plan layout). This phase would see an increase in the number of units erected if it is apparent
that the local demand would support it.
I propose to commit to build an additional 30% (4) more units above the apparent demand in
anyone phase, to allow for a probable increase in demand for extra space with the typical
additional pilots during the winter months.
Phase II To consist of the erection of eighteen hangars; four (4) shaded hangars (see
section D plan layout), six (6) enclosed hangars (see section F plan layout), eight (8) enclosed T
hangars ( see section G plan layout), and a wash rack.
Phase III To consist of the erection of twenty-two (22) hangars; six (6) enclosed hangars
(see section H plan layout), nine (9) shaded T hangars (see section A plan layout), and seven (7)
shaded hangars (see section B plan layout).
I would like to leave some room for flexibility to increase or decrease the exact number of any
particular type of hangar, which should prove to be more beneficial, specifically for the long-term
tenants.
PROPOSED LAND RENT
This offer is to lease any space which has a roof over it for an amount not less than thirty (30)
cents per square foot per year; and all of the adjacent surrounding property for five (5)cents per
square foot per year, which includes the areas for Phase II and III as well. Once the latter two
phases are developed into available rental units, an additional twenty-five (25) cents will apply.
This lease shall be based on a twenty (20) year contract per phase. If, for example, Phase II is
completed two years after Phase I, then the lease for Phase II will end two years later than Phase
I. This clause will ensure some protection for this investor should there be a lower than
anticipated demand for hangar space. This lease will take effect, if approved, thirty days prior to
the start of construction. Monroe County then will begin receiving approximately $14,250.00 per
year. With Phase I construction completed, an addition in revenue of approximately $3,656.00
per year will be generated. With the completion of Phases II & III, the total revenue to the
county shall be approximately $29,496.00 per year.
Since I am committed to providing my neighbors with the most affordable approach, I have tried
to be as realistic as possible with the overall cost. Again, I am open for future negotiation.
HANGAR COST
It is my understanding that, to benefit from the option of funding with a 50% private investment
and a 50% funding from FDOT, the project must be properly advertised for public biding. It
should be understood, that with this process, it is very difficult to project an exact cost; and under
the established guidelines, the County has an equal amount of control, or more, than the private
investor over the cost of this project. Realistically then, at this point in time, the amount
projected by URS Greiner are the costs that have to be considered. If any savings could be
generated, from a developer assuming this project without it going out in the open bidding
process, it would not match the savings of the 50/50 approach.
RENT AL RATES
This firm proposes rental rates based on the projected cost using 50% private investment and
50% funding from FDOT. Should the cost of construction increase or decrease, the rent will ~e
proportionally adjusted. Also, if Monroe County provides the infractucture as suggested above,
the rate shall decrease proportionately.
Our projected rates, including administration fees, maintenance, and utilities are:
A&C T SHADE $259.00 Monthly
B&D R SHADE $488.00 Monthly
G&E T HANGAR $381.00 Monthly
H&F R HANGAR $579.00 Monthly
These monthly rents are somewhat higher than the feasibility study indicates, however, they are
more in line with the real cost. The study, for example, did not take into consideration any return
for the private money invested, which will add a considerable increase in cost. If this project is to
become a reality, with Monroe County benefiting by receiving a two million dollar ($2,000,000.)
parcel with improvements at the end of this contract, and also due to receive a projected yearly
income of a least twenty-nine thousand dollars ($29,000.) in the interim, Monroe County should
produce the infrastructure as I have indicated above, making this project more affordable and
more in demand, possibly then contributing to all of the proposed units built in a shorter period
oftime.
MANAGEMENT/MAINTENANCE COST & PLAN
Our proposed management and maintenance cost, which is included in our proposed rental
schedule above, is approximately 18%.
I plan to manage this project from my construction company,located 25 minutes from the airport.
As a general and electrical contractor, I am capable of handling all necessary maintenance.
EXISTING FOUR SHADE HANGAR
This agreement is subject to negotiation in the future between the current tenants and interested
parties.
This offer, as submitted, is binding for ninety (90) days.
SWORN ST A TEl\1 ENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 287.133(3)(;1),
FLORIDA STATUTES..J ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES
-'
THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR
ornER OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OA TBS. This Sl'l.orn statement is submitted
to Monroe County
.., (print name of the public entity)
by
Pedro Falcon, OWner
(print individual's nama and title)
for
Pedro Falcon
(print name of entity submitting sworn statement)
1\.hose husiness address is
31160 Avenue C, Big Pine Key, FL 33043
and (if applicable) its Federal Emplo)'er Identification Number (FEIN) is
59-2330231
.
(II the entity has no FEIN, include the Social Security Number of the indhidual signing this sworn
statement:
.)
I understand that a "public entity crime" as defined in Paragraph 287.I33(1)(g), Florida StatutesJ means a
\iolation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and directly related to the transaction of business
1\.ith any public entity orl\"ith an agency or political subdhision of any other state or of the United States, including,
but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or senices to be pro\.ided to any public entity or an agency or
political subdhision of anyotherstateor:ofthe United States and invohing antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, COllusion,
racketeering, conspiracy, or material misreprcsc:ntation.
I understand that "convicted" or "con\iction" as defined in Paragraph 287.I33(J)(b), Florida Statutes, means a
finding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, 1\.ith or 1\.ithout an adjudication of guiU, in any federal or
state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or infonnation after July I, 1989, as a result
of a jury verdict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty 'or nolo contendere.
...
I understand that an "affiliate" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(I)(a), F(orida Statutes, means:
1. A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public entity crime; or
2. An cntity under the control of any n~ral person who is active in the management or the entity and who has
been convicted or a public entity crime. The tenn "affiliate" includes those officers, directors, executh.es, partners,
shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of an affiliate. The ownership
by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or pooling of equipment or income
among persons when not for fair market value under an ann's length agreement, shall be a prima facie case that
one person controls another person. A person who knowingly entcrs into a joint ,.enture with a person ".ho has been
con\icted of a public entit}, crime in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered an affiliate.
I understand that a "person" as defined in Paragraph 287.IJJ(I)(c), Florida Statutes, means aDY natural person
or entity organized under the laws of any state or of the United States ".ith the legal power to eDter into a bindiDg
COntract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision of gOOds or sen'ices let by a public entity,
orwbicb otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term "person" includes tbose
om~ers, directors, elecutil'es, partners, shareholders, employees, membe~ and agents wbo are acth.e in
management of an entity. 1.2.J.4.5.
Based on infonnation and belief, the slalemenl which I hal'e marked below is lrue in relalion 10 Ihe enlity
submilling Ihi! sworn stalemenf. (Indicate which statemenl applies.'
~
-1L- Neilher the entity submilting this m.orn st.1tement, nor an)' of its omcer~, dircclor~, elecuti,"e~,
partnen, shareholders, emplo)'ees, members. or agents who arc acth'e in the managcml:nt of the enlit}', nor
-' Any nmlinlr of Ihr rnlil)' hn.. hrrn rhnq~rll wilh nnli C"lIndrlrc/nf II pllIJlir rnlil)' rrimr ~lIlnrC]lIrnt In Jllly
I, 19119.
- The entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its omcen, directors, elecuth'es, partners,
shareholden, emplo)'ees, memben, or a~.ents tl'ho arc actil"e in the management of the entity, nor an amliate
of the entity ha! been charged with anu con-.:icted of a public entity crime subsequent to July I, 1989.
~ The entity submitting this SlYorn statement, or one or more of its omcen, directors, executives,
partners, !hareholders, emplo).ees, members, or agents who are acth'e in the management of the entity, or
an amliate of the entity has been charged with and cOn\'icted of a public entit), crime subsequent to July I.
1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Omcer of the State of Florida,
Division of Administrath.e HearinJ:S and the Final Order entered by the Hearing Omeer detennined that
it was not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement on the convicted vendor
li!(. [Attach a copy of the final order)
6. I UNDERSTAND TIIArTIIE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM TO TIlE CONTRACTING OFFI'CER
FOR TilE PUBLIC ENTITY IDENTIFIED ON PARAGRAPIt'1 (ONE) ABOVE IS FOR TIIA TPUDLIC
ENTITY ONLY AND, TnATTIIISFORM IS VALIDTIIROUGII DECEMBERJI OF TIlE CALENDAR
YEAR IN WIIICH IT IS FILED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND TIIAT I AM REQUIRED TO INFORM THE
PUBLIC ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF TilE THRESHOLD
AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.017,FLORIDASTATUTES FORCATEGORVTIVO OF ANY
CHANGE IN TUE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TIllS FORrt1.
--J(~~~
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 12th day of
April
2000 .
Personall}' known
xx
~ ~U-L? q'(')~( 0--
OR Produced identiCication
Notary.Public - State of Florida
I I
(Type of identification)
My Commission expires 04/04/2002
. eU{~6i'or. IHmWAAD
'" " isslo~Q~W~~~ blic)
, . . l~rm:.c}4AS4/2002
I'IIOQ'~'NOTARY FIa
. Notary Services &; ~
Fonn PUR 7068 (Rev. 06/11/92)
)
SWORN STATE1vfENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO, 10-1990
MONROE COUNTY. FLORIDA
Enncs CLAUSE
Pedro Falcon
warrants that heJit has not employed. retained
or otherwise had act on his/its behalf any former County officer or employee in violation of
S~ction 2 of Ordinance no. 10-1990 or any County officer or employee in violation of
Section J of Ordinance No. 10-1990. For breach or violation of this provision the County
may, in its discretion, tenninate this contract without liability and may also, in its discretion,
deduct from tlie contract or purchase price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of any fee,
commission, percentage, gift, or consideration paid to ,be fonner County officer or employee.
~~o~
--- (signatur )
Date: April 12, 2000
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTy OF MONROE
PERSONALL Y APPEARED BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority.
Pedro Falcon
I I
who. after first being Sworn by me, affixed his/her
signature (name of individual signing) in t~e space provided above on this 12th
day of
April
~.
~~y~~'J-&-~
My commission expires:
;.".y 'lI~ JUDY A SHEPHARD
.,. ll.ar1 ~ MY COMMISSION /I CC 723.593
"'''t~$ EXPIRES: 04/0412002
1-800-3-NOTARY Fl. NOlarySeMces& Bonwng
MCP#4
...:
DRUG-FREE \VORKPLACE FORM
, The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that:
Pedro Falcon
(Name of Business) .
1. PuhIish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispens-
ing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the
actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Infonn employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations.
,
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are
under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1).
4. In the statement specified in subsection (1 ), notify the employees that, as a condition of working
on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the tenns
of the. statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 (Florida Statutes) or of any controlled substance law
of the United States or any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5)
days after such conviction. .
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program ifsuch is available in the emplo'yee's community, or any employee who is
so convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free Workplace through implementation
of this section. I I
As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above
requirements.
&j)~~,~
--Bidd '5 Signature .
April 12, 2000
Date
MCP#5 REV. 6/91
917 I
I
I
,
I
I
I ,
I
,
I
I
('}, ,
1
<t 1
~, \. ~.. I
)
f~ <1
<.t I
~'-
'^
0... I
<( ..--
0... to
7
.
>
W
--.J ,
W
--.J
I W
I 0:::::
~-------,-
I I
I I
/ l__ ---1___
I I
/A
!
e
~ Ii 1- .
~~ .
I 0 - ~
1
w<(
l?r:D
<(:r:
Zu
<(~
0:::::<(
Ou
I
I'
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
---------.-------,
~--- -------------------~
~ . j--=-iJi-.;-;r:
~ ./ (--t~-r" :=[~
x 'I -i.r1-- I '-j
<( ~I (~-t-'r.r)1 ~~
~ ~ I - i}~ _ I ,H It)
III I It) r I.~--
! ~ I :-i1U) t~~
,/ ~( ~I_I~ 1-
\ t:L..J' (...-1",_=
-- -,--" j":!::lC
-- - - I~U
--J -r.:-- l I~~
I , (- !{1::J I -..f==
-1110 1 J 1 1 10
1 - I-.r-t. ~
( I ,... I --:---
II ilO I 1 ..--
- .r-t. I '-j
110 I I ~
I (~-r"l...r ~..--
I ~ 1 I' =-i
f I (- ~~J--1-- I d:
- '"'L )1 IN
NI ~
- -:- t~::1- I '-1:-
g t:L..r - - -L__
^
,
:t
,gOI ,Ofl P'"' -__, '... -r--"~ I
1-' I - I
- i.'"'LJ--) I r-l..__ l'
t NI '-j f
- if1-- I N
I (0 I It) '- 1 '0"'..--
- m -I -)/ =-i k
itJ~~'1 . -i.}i- ,-J..': f'
.. > G. a:' 10 L I '-i ~
II: ... Ii >t:L.~JO'J ...-I Ie
... '---
-- - - (rai~11
-- --- l-c!;i
---.'1 "----f' I L~.e!JI
~ (g J \ ..--
-r::r i I
,g~ 1 \ -II _"]-J 1 ~ - 1
~ I -.1f'1.J-- I --:--- t
~ -iN I I I N f
~ 1 (- ,[~1-- 1 jj--- i
~ I - -i'"'L.r 110 I It) f
- i~~) ~_:.
I( fll I~
i ~-t-rJ--II ~-- 1
ilO I I 10
- f-t. ~ '
( ,,,,, I 1 '--1--
\ - -r"l..J--) I I 10 I
110 1 ~ '
,- - 1.f1- '--1:--
. ten , 'JI;'-
t1.r- - - ..J.._,_
I
/
,
-1-----,
: \
I \
I \
__J \
\
,
\ !
,l1g .9f
,09
,111 !
~ j Ii
~
I
I
I
I
April 11, 2000
To:
Monroe County, A Political Division of the
State of Florida
"Sealed Bid for Development of Hangars at Marathon Airport, "For:
50% Capital Investment and 100% Development Management and Maintenance of General
Aviation Hangars at Marathon Airport
From: Marathon Hangar Development, Inc.
Daniel Christensen, President
Marvin Schindler, V. President
Brian C. Schmitt, Sec., Treasurer
Delivered to: Monroe County Purchasing Office
5100 College Road
Public Service
Building
Cross Wing #002
Stock Island
Key West, FL 33040
Documents: 2 Sets of Original Documents
2 Sets of Copies
-2-
PROPOSAL:
Marathon Hangar Development Inc. a Florida Corporation (MHD, Inc.) proposes to construct
one phase of the two phased hangar project as outlined in the feasibility study for Marathon
Airport by URS Greiner dated March 1999 wherein MHD provides 50% invesiment and 50% is
from the Federal Department of Transportation (FOOT).
MHD, Inc. will design, develop and build up to 40 enclosed hangars meeting FEMA
requirements and ASCE-7-95 wind design requirements and Firewells to meet Monroe County
Fire Marshall requirements on the Easterly pad site as shown in the Greiner report in four (4)
phases according to the attached proposed plan marked Exhibit 'A'. This proposal is consistent
with option two (2) as presented to the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners as
outlined in the memo from Peter Horton dated 9/2/99 which was a part of the bid package. This
proposal will allow for Monroe County to pursue options I and 3 (as outlined in the Horton
memo) on the Westerly pad site. This scenario will optimize Monroe County's ability to pursue
all options separately.
All options are not equally viable however. The underutilized Marathon Airport needs to attract
more general aviation interests and increase usage of the facility, fuel, sales, etc. This proposal .
which "is by far the easiest for the Airport" according to the Horton Memo above referenced is
the most viable because MHD, Inc. has the knowledge, financial resources, track record and
qualifications to actually complete the project. The other options which Monore County is free
to pursue at the Westerly pad site are much less likely to result in anything actually being built
which would be very unfortunate for the Marathon Airport. The construction of these hangars
will increase the number of aircraft based at Marathon Airport which will increase take off and
landings which will result in increased federal funding to Monroe County.
OUALIFICAITONS OF THE DEVELOPER:
Daniel Christensen, President ofMHD, Inc., is also President of North Peny Aviation at North
Peny Airport in Broward County, FL. North Peny Aviation has developed and maintained 36
hangars at North Peny Airport plus two (2) fixed base operators, one being 7000 sq. ft. the other
5000 sq. ft. All facilities are first class operations. Monroe County is welcome to visit these
facilities at any time. Currently, Dan is in the process of developing 40 additional hangars at
North Peny. Dan is a private pilot and owns a home in Marathon.
Marvin Schindler, V. President ofMHD, Inc., is a resident of Marathon for the past Ii
years and has owned a number of businesses including Marathon Glass Company and Florida
Keys Truss, Co. which have completed a number of construction contracts with Monroe County
and the Monroe County School Board. Marv is a decorated army pilot and is on the Board of
Tm Bank.
Brian C. Schmitt, Sec. & Treasurer ofMHD, Inc., is a lifelong resident of Marathon and has
successfully developed over 100,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in Monroe County. He and his
companies own, manage and maintain a similar amount of space from Key Largo to Key West.
-3-
Brian is a Director of First National Bank of the Florida Keys and President of Coldwell Banker
Schmitt Real Estate, Co.
The officers of Marathon Hangar Development, Inc. are uniquely capable of financing, building,
managing, and maintaining the hangars at Marathon Airport and have a proven record of
successfully completing construction projects in Monroe County.
BID PROPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS:
In specific and complete response to all of the Bid Proposal Specifications (as numbered in the
bid sheet) Marathon Hangar Development, Inc. proposes to:
I. Construct up to 40 enclosed hangars,
2. In four (4) phases often (10) hangars per phase,
3. For a completed cost per hangar of$35,000 - total cost - $17,500, - 50% Developer
Investment cost,
4. And rent the hangars to the general aviation public from $300. To $400. per month which
rental rates are in line with the URS Greiner estimates.
5. MHO, Inc will maintain the hangars utilizing local contractors, setting up a reserve account
sufficient enough to maintain the hangar facility,
6. Monroe County will realize 30 cents per square foot for each square foot covered by the
footprint of the hangar buildings under a 20 year lease. The rental amount will be adjusted
annually in accordance with the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for
wage earners and clerical workers in the Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, Florida area and will be
based on the annual average CPI computation from January 1 to December 31 of the prior
year. Rent will only be assessed starting on the date when a hangar structure receives its
Certificate of Occupancy from Monroe County. Rent for the area not covered by hangar
buildings shall be assessed at II cents per sq. ft. per year and shall only be assessed on areas
that are paved with asphalt or concrete and shall be assessed starting when those areas are
completed and an inspection is provided by Monroe County Building Dept. At the end of20
years the lease will expire and will revert to Monroe County. MHD, Inc. has the option to
review the lease at any time prior to expiration of the initial term on conditions acceptable to
both parties.
It is anticipated based on the overall size of the development site and the overall size of the
building foot print that when all four (4) phases of the project are completed that Monroe County
will receive $20,000:t annually for this lease plus cost of living increases over the 20 year term.
The projected rent to Monroe County is based on 48,000 sq. ft. of building area at 30 cents/sq.
ft./yr. And 50,000 sq. ft. of paving area at 10.8 cents per sq. ft./year. These are the rates
currently in effect for Marathon Airport according to the bid package. Upon completion of every
phase of the project Monroe County will accept title to the buildings. MHO, Inc. shall then be
responsible for normal and routine maintenance of the hangar facilities, not to include hangar
-4-
facility repairs to the surrounding area. If during the term of the lease the hangar facility is
destroyed or damaged, then Monroe County must promptly repair or reconstruct the hangar at no
cost to MHD, Inc. The repair or reconstruction must be made with the same quality materials
and in the same dimensions as the damaged or destroyed hangar facility. MHD, Inc. will be
responsible for liability insurance, but no insurance for the structures or improvements.
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE PROPOSAL:
1. Monroe County will provide FKAA potable water to the development site at its sole cost and
expense.
2. Monroe County will provide FKEC electric service to the development site at its sole cost
and expense.
3. Monroe County will provide all permits and conditional use development approvals from all
agencies including, but not limited to, FAA, FDOT, DCA, Monroe County Planning &
Building Depts., US Fish & Wildlife, ACOE and FDEP at Monroe County's sole cost and
expense.
4. Monroe County will provide the development site pad with sufficient compacted fill of'
appropriate density, size and slump to the elevation required by the permitting agencies and
FEMA to allow for the proposed development at Monroe County's sole cost and expense.
5. Monroe County will not require bathrooms on the development site unless and until Monroe
County provides a hookup to a central sewage treatment facility operated by Monroe County
an/or the FKAA.
6. Monroe County will provide ingress and egress to and from the development from US#1 or
Aviation Blvd. and shall provide and pay for any curb cuts, traffic studies, deceleration or
acceleration lanes, traffic signals or the like.
7. MHD, Inc. has evaluated the lease with Hangars On and finds that it is financially and
logistically unfeasible to enclose the existing shade hangar structure leased to Hangars On
pursuant to the terms of that lease. MHD, Inc. proposes to design, build and construct four
(4) nested T hangars as apart of its development plan (Exhibit A) and will provide those
hangars free of charge to Monroe County in exchange for a 20 year ground lease for the four
(4) shade hangars in their existing configuration and without any further improvements as
required in the lease with Hangars On. MHD, Inc. would then be free to lease these shade
hangars to others at market rates of about $250. per hangar per month. Monroe County
would then not charge MHD, Inc. any ground rent for the four (4) enclosed T hangars turned
over to Monroe County.
8. This proposal is valid for 90 days from April 12, 2000.
-5-
I
~::if f~.~
Witne&,s / /. p/ .
'>L-/j ],z/}./.-, .~ ~/LU>Zl--t~.
Witness \ j !
Personally appeared before me Marvin Schindler who is personally known to me and who
affixed his signature this II day of April, 2000. .
\--r~ ~, vi!
N:ar: Pubi1J'~Jr/'UJ-'2:r'-J~
By:
c~' ("
Marv Schindler, V. Pres
My Commission Expires:
MARY L. KIRWAN
MY COMMISSION' CC 703002
EXPIRES: FebnJ&ry 2. 2002
Bonded ThAI NolaJy PIIb11c Ondllwrilens
Attachments:
I. Marathon Hangar Development, Inc.
Development Plan - Exhibit' A'
2. Sworn Statement Under Ordinance No. 10-1990
3. Drug Free Workplace Form
4. Non-Collusion Affidavit
SWORN ST A TE1v1ENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. J 0- J 990
MONROE COUNTY. FLORIDA
w
/
ETIllCS CLAUSE
}#&J;!t!J1;/I;P'"'.:izL.,fyw) rt!1rJf77171J /lfrJ-:;Jt. warrants that helit has not employed. retained
,~~~~ft/J. ,;:"" I. -ru -1'- ,
j~Z::G.{..'I''Xk&Y-'(i -o:-rlJt.-.
or otherwise had act on hislits behalf any fonner County officer or employee in violation of
S~ction 2 of Ordinance no. 10-1990 or any County officer or emplo"yee in violation of
Section 3 of Ordinance No. I 0- I 990. For breach or violation of this provision the County
may. in its discretion, terminate this contract without liability and may also. in its discretion,
deduct from the. contract or purchase price,. or otherwise recover. the full amount of any fee.
conunission. percentage. gift. or consideration paid to ~ne fonner Coun
u
or employee.
/:(
Date:
l
(signature)
.y /rr/CzJ
/ (
STATE OF ;::- /---. () /.2 ( Ll A
COUNTY OF /11 c"t.) /c~ ~
PERSONALL Y APPEARED BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority.
/71/.1/2.(/ It..' P :)('-H- / I"''.:)L~ L
who. after first being sworn by me. affixed hislher
signature (name of individual signing) in t~e space provided above on this I ( day of
U~J' ,~c'7rz,. ,-t9- .
I
';:;;/J:;:m:~~dffl~
My commission expires:
~
~'r~""~
$1 ~1F;';:r~,,- MARY l. KIRWAN
i; f':~> :.~ MY OOMMISSION' CC men.v.
\,.;1>-.".. r~"
1i ;~;;.....""W EXPIRES: Februmy2 2002
,!' .-~~'~'" Bonded Thru NolBJy PlJbIlc Un~
MCP#4
DRUG-FREE \VORKPLACE FORM
'-f'
, The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that:
. /111Jt1f1lz'1,) /.f?t~it1L 72"iEdtffllfi1;f
(Name ofBustness~ .
I. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispens-
ing, possession, or use ofa controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the
actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Infonn employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations.
,
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are
under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (I).
4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working
on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, t~e employee will abide by the terms
of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 (Florida Statutes) or of any controlled substance law
of the United States or any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5)
days after such conviction. .
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program ifsuch is available in the employee's community, or any employee who is
so convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free Workplace through implementation
of this section. I I
As t~e person authorized to Sig~.e ~ertifY that this firm complies fully with the above
requtrements. . . . ~~ (/ '. .., .
0( ( ~/~
Bidder's Signature
~/r /;.70
1:>ate (
.,-
..
MCP#5 REV. 6/9\
SWORN STA TEI\1 ENT PURSUANT TO SF.CTION 287.133(3)(:1),
FLORIDA STATUTE~ ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES
,,~
THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR
OTHER OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. This sworn statement is submitted
to Ih~bx..t(tti-Cbu1-l-q:
(print nama of the ubJic entityl
'"
by
)J1J1tJ,,(/J ~tf7/JI::t&e-j" Mcf_ ~51 afU(
[print individual's neme ~nd titla)
f1t~ffl~J ~<<-" 08t~W~~ ::7)ttL-
(print neme of enti submitting Sworn statement)
for
whose business address is
/;/O() or/&t5'E1:s
IZtMfl?t;K) I k
I
~
3 =;{'7>0
/'
and (if applicable) its Federal Emplo)'er Identification Number (FEIN) is
At'I'LircLJ k~.
(If the entity has no FEIN, include the Social Security Number of the indhidual signing this m.orn
statement:
517-5f-/?;57
.)
I understand that a "public entity crime" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(g), Florida Statutes, means a
liolation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and dircttly related to the transaction of business
",'ith any public entity or with an agency or political subdhision of any other state or of the United States, including,
but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or services to be pro,.ided to any public entity or an agency or
political subdhision of any other state or: of the United States and iD\'ohing antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion.
racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentation.
I understand that "convicted" or "con\iction" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(b), Florida Statutes, means a
finding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, l\'itb or without an adjudication of guilt, in any federal or
state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or infonnation after July I, 1989, lU a result
of a jury verdict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty'or nolo contendere.
I understand that an "affiliate" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(a), Florida Statutes, means:
I. A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public eniity crime; or
2. An entity under the control of any natural person who is active in the manageD:lent of the entity and who bas
been convicted of a public entity crime. The tenn "affiliate" includes those officers, dircttors, exctutins, partners.
shareholders, employees, members. and agents who are active in the management of an affiliate. The ownership
by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or pooling of equipment or income
among persons whcn not for fair market valuc under an ann's length agreement, shall be a prima facie case tbat
one person controls anothcr pcrson. A pcrson who knowingly enters into a joint ,'enture with a person l\.ho has been
comicted of a public cntity crimc in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered an affiliate.
I understand that a "pcrson" as defined in Paragraph 287.IJ3(l)(e), Florida Statutes, means any natural person
or entity organized undcr thc laws of any state or of the United Statcs with the legal power to enter into a binding
contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision of goods or services let by a public entity,
orwhich othcrwise transact! or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term "person" includes those
offi.;.ers, dircttors, cIccutiycs, partncrs, shareholdcrs, emplo).ce.s, mcm~crs, and agents ",.bo are acth'c in
management of an eDtity.1.2.J.4.5.
"
Based on information and belief, the statement which I ha\'e marked below is true in rclalionJo the enlity
submitting this sworn statement. [Indicate which statement applies.1 ., :,
Neither the entit), submitting this sn'orn statement, nor any of its officer~, dircctor~, elecuti\'e~,
partners, shareholders, employees, mcmhers, or agents who arc acti\'e in the management of the entity, nor
~ any nffilint(' of Ih(' ('nlit), hn~ 1I('('n rhnq~('eI with nnel ("lUl\'kl('f1 IIf R Jlllhlk ('ntil)' ("rim(' "lIh,~('qll('nt to .Jill)'
1.19R9.
_ The entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, directors, elecuti\"es, partners.
shareholders, emplo)'ees, members, or a~enls n'ho arc acti\"C in the management of the entity, nor an affiliate
of the entity has been charged with anil cOf1\:icted of a public entity crime subsequent to July I, 1989.
. The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officen, directors, elecutives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are acti\'e in the management of the entity.' or
s.n affiliate of the entity has been charged with and coO\.icted of a public entit). crime subsequent to July I,
1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Officer of the State of Florida.
Division of Administrati\"C~ Hearings and the Final Order entered by the Hearing Officer determined that
it ~.as not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement on the convicted vendor
list (Attach a copy of the final order)
6. I UNDERSTAND TIIA T TilE SUBMISSION OF TillS FORM TO TilE CONTRACTING OFFICER
FOR TnE PUBLIC ENTITY IDENTIFIED ON PARAGRAPh'l (ONE) ABOVE IS FOR TIIA TPUDLIC
ENTITY ONLY AND. TnATTIIISFORM IS VALIDTIIROUGIlDECrMDERJI OFTIIECALENDAR
YEAR IN WIIICn IT IS FILED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND TIIA T I AM REQUIRED TO INFORM TnE
PUBLIC ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF TilE THRESnOLD
AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.017, FLORIDA STATUTES FOR CATEGORY TIVO OF ANY
CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED I{;I~~
(signaturel
Sworn to and subscribed before me this I (
r) _ ,
da). of ;)~ t--f:- ~"7?
,ar
Persona"J known I')V+ll-v (~( F ,~!I /NOc&:l-
OR Produced identification
/-=- L-O /2- /" /1 L1
Notary.Public - State of , ~/ /\.
I I
(Type of identification)
{;~
J \"nlf.,
;i..1~!I'...r~~.o MARy l. KIRWAN
Y.::A ;:J MY COMMISSION' CC 703002
,;' '7;~,~t;}~ EXPIRES: February 2. 2002
. .:>::::::: Bonalld 1111\1 Nobuy Public I......._.~
. .~._,~--.-.P~ VI',.....wn..1'I
Form PUR 7068 (Rev. 06/11/92)
)
;;:-
..
~
~.~&i
j~~' , I "I
~' '~...i.-L.~_~I
I '
, ':" I'. .'. , .
; . . _ :;~.;1: ;. I I ~ I :
, ,,!, I" '::I
' . '" .""'" '.:.' I W
.: ; ::{y~: i ~.I.~
. '. j'.t.. If
:)..: ':1
,;,11
. II
' I
II
II
:1 ~
II.~ .,~
.~, I ~., ~
. ,~_.., ,_~ d ~
lJ~!, .~-4r-t-
1\
. : I
! I
:II-n
~ '()
III -:t: ~
~t<'
I 0 ..'X
II ~~
-;z .c'-
I ~'"""
I ~
I ""'t
l-t
I
1
I
~
~
~ ~h\"..,;
:..., ~ ~t'r~.,'"
~ 1;: l'" ':
.~ ~. .
:~ ~ '
'fl
\ I .
,
:,',~:
~I
~ ~ -~
,;,.:' ~
. '.;.... _. .'
, .
i
.
=<
1
,
I
, ,
- -'- I~~-;:-:-- ~ -
.. J.t
Q . ;
~ ~- 's~j~ 1____
j ~S.~a~,
I .~~ ;~7.,:
I '~ : .-- .
: ~ .J)
~
~
Q
r'
~
ll~
~F-
~
I
\
! \&l'
, '~
sJ
tii
.~
cJ
o&J
v
d
~
~
J
FLORIDA KEYS AVIATION ASSOCIATION
P. O. Box 500802
Marathon, FL 33050
The decision made by the Board of County Commissioners on 12/8/99 - 12/9/99 regarding
the construction of general aviation hangars at Marathon Airport was as follows: A co-op
or corporation of hangar owners to construct hangars to standard specifications. (Advertise
a R.F.P.) Based on the BOCC's preference for local, individual participation through a co-
op or corporate mode, we respectfully submit the following:
(1) As a result of extensive research undertaken by the Florida Keys Aviation
Association, it has been shown that there is an immediate need for general aviation
hangars at the Marathon Airport. Our association has determined that a first phase
development would support approximately 20 hangars.
(2) We believe that based on our study, a total build-out of this project (approximately
53 hangars) will take place over a period of 10 years and that there may be a need
to extend the life of the permit for five to ten years after the first phase. There will
be a progressive build-out over the life of the permit.
(3) Concerning the cost of the completed hangars, that will very much depend on
whether the hangars are enclosed or an open shed type. Other variables include
whether they will be of a "T' configuration or a "through" configuration (entrance in
the front and rear). We can only estimate the costs at this time. Enclosed average
cost, without site prep, which excludes access paving, fill, etc., will be approximately
$18,500.00. Open shade type average cost, without site prep, which excludes
access paving, fill, etc., is approximately $13,500.00.
(4) Based on South Florida rates at similar airports and assuming the hangar owner
wishes to sublet, we estimate rentals to be as follows:
Enclosed
Open Shade
$350.00 per month
$200.00 per month
(5) As described in similar county leases to other hangar owners at the Marathon
Airport, maintenance should be divided between lessee and lessor on a major-
minor basis. Management of the co-op or corporation will be part of the charges
assessed by the co-op or corporation on its membership by the Board of Directors.
(6) Monroe County will receive, based on other existing leases at the Marathon
Airport, approximately 30~ - 32~ per square foot under hangars and a square foot
rate to be determined for support area needed for these hangars. This rate should
be based on the present rate as charged by Monroe County to the existing FBO's-
Paradise and Grant Air "ramp area." -
NOTES
A. Reference Item "C" - It is expected that this proposal will utilize 50-50 funding as
described in Item "C".
B. Reference Item "E" - This proposed cannot address Item "E" other than to make
suggestions to Monroe County on this issue.
1. People have expressed interest in purchasing this facility for the storage of
aircraft.
2. People have expressed interest in purchasing this facility to do work on
general aviation aircraft, which would fall under airport minimum standards,
Section F, Page 29.
The Florida Keys Aviation Association highly recommends serious consideration be given
to this idea.
C. Were it the desire of the BOCC, the Florida Keys Aviation Association would
consider a compromise to development, which would be as follows:
50% of this hangar development would be dedicated to local
individual participation. The remaining 50% would be
dedicated to a developer who would build and rent hangars.
The construction area would be divided between local
participation and a developer as follows: The East and West
project areas will be equally divided in a North-South direction.
~~ 0~(
7~...2 ~
~
SWORN STATEMENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 10-1990
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ETillCS CLAUSE
~. ~~..:.. a ~ warrants that helit has not employed, retained
~~ .~~~
or otherwise had act bn' hislits behalf any former County officer or employee in violation of
Section 2 of Ordinance no. 10-1990 or any County officer or employee in violation of
Section 3 of Ordinance No. 10-1990. For breach or violation of this provision the County
may, in its discretion, terminate this contract without liability and may also, in its discretion,
deduct from the contract or purchase price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of any fee,
commission, percentage, gift, or consideration paid to the former County officer or employee.
..--
STATEOF~/d""
t/ -
COUNTY OF A1/~
.
~ 0 ~ ~
\ (~\ 1(~
(signature)
Date: C2~...:? I 0 - .2,
1
LJ7)
~ALL Y APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
"".14' ~~ ,who, after first being sworn by me, affixed hislher
~ ~
signature (name of individual sigmng) in the space provided above on this ) 0 day of
C)~L
,~h.bD
~cdJL
My commission expires:
MCP#4
~
DRUG-FREE \VORKPLACE FORM
~ The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby cenifies that:
/?At!~",.I:~"s.-Al'u'-rn"lJ A,s-",c. .-b, 43.i ~~~~.,; ~
i (NciR1e of Business) .
I. Publish a statement notifying'employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispens-
ing. possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and speci1}ring the
actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance prograinS, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug ab~se
violations.
,
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are
under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (I).
4. In the statement specified in subsection (I), notifY the employees that, as a condition of working
on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms
of the. statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 (Florida Statutes) or of any controlled substance law
of the United States or any stat~ for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5)
days after such conviction. .
s. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program ifsuch is available in the employee's community. or any employee who is
so convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free Workplace through implementation
of this section.
As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above
requirements. ~ ~ ( 2.-
Bidder's Signature
Q&-;---.,::: / 0 -2/"f~./
f'Oate
MCP#5 REV. 6/9)
Based on information and belief, the statement which I have marked below is true in relation to the entity
submitting this sworn statement. [Indicate which statement applies.]
~er the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, directors, executives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor
any affiliate of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1,
1989.
The entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, directors, executives, partners,
shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor an affiliate
of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989.
The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officers, directors, executives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, or
an affiliate of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1,
1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Officer of the State of Florida,
Division of Administrative Hearings and the Final Order entered by the Hearing Officer determined that
it was not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement on the convicted vendor
list. [Attach a copy of the final order]
6. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER
FOR THE PUBLIC ENTITY IDENTIFIED ON PARAGRAPH 1 (ONE) ABOVE IS FOR THAT PUBLIC
ENTITY ONLY AND, THAT THIS FORM IS VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31 OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR IN WHICH IT IS FILED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT I AM REQUIRED TO INFORM THE
PUBLIC ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF THE THRESHOLD
AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SECTION 287,017, FLORIDA STATUTES FOR CATEGORY TWO OF ANY
CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM.
'7
Sworn to and subscribed before me this Jo day of ~
,ffl" ~
Personally known
~
OR Produced identification
Notary Public - State of -Elot"\clo..
;toClO
(Type of identification)
(Printed typed or stamped
commissioned name of notary public)
Form PUR 7068 (Rev. 06/11/92)
OFFICIAL NOTAR SEAL
PAMELA A SHAW
NOTARY PUBUCsrATE OF R.ORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC578897
. MISSION EXP, SEPT 7
SWORN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 287.J3J(J)(:.),
FLORIDA STATUT~ ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES
THIS FORM MUST DE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN TIlE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR
ornER OmCIAL AUTHORIZED );.0 ADMINISTER O~ ms. Thi .sft.om stalemenl is submitted
to //1 R'it' /L tiE Lh v .v --v. . ~.h-7t ",,-I..Il'; r.-s 's $'';;)t~
~ (print nama of public entityJ
....
by /c; [
rorhA "t-F~r Av/~r;",~ AS'.rd~
. f nama of entity submitting sworn statament)
".hose busincss address is
~ C1 ~~
?'O2-
/h A-7t p..:;- A-.-. rt.J r-L&> ,'1... ~. T\.--. ~ ~ 0 ~ Q
.I
and (if applicable) its Federal EmpJo)"er Idenliliation Number (FEIN) is
.
(II tbe entily has no FEIN, iDclude the Social Security Number o( the ~ndhiduaJ signing this SWOrD
stalemeol: .y n - 00 '" "" 0 0 I ..r S /f/ ~ o,i -i ' :3 ~ _ 7 ~ Zf .J
/
I understand that a "public &:Dtity crime" as defined iD Paragraph 287.J33(1){g), Ronda Statutes. means a
\iolation of any state or federal law by a persoD ,dth respect to aDd directly related to tbe transactiOD o(busiDess
".ith any public entity or "ith an agency or political subdhisioD of auy otber state or of the United States, iDcluding,
but not limited to, aDY bid or contract for goods or serviccs to be pro\.ided to aDY public eDtity or a.a ageney or
political subdhision of any otherstate or: oftbe United States and iDvohing antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion,
racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentation.
I uDderstand that "con\icted" or "coD\iction" as defined in Paragraph 287.J33(I)(b), Florida Statutes, mc:ans a
fiDding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, with or without aD adjudicatioD of guilt, in a.ay federal or
state triaJ court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or information after July 1, 1989, as a result
of a jury verdict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty .or nolo conteDdere.
...
I understand that an "affiliate" as defined iD Paragraph 287.133(J){a), Florida Statutes, means:
1. A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public eaiity crime; or
2. AD entity under tbe control of any Mtural person who is active in the manag~ent of the eDtity and who has
beeD cODvicted of a public entity crime:. The term" affiliate" includes those officers, db'ecton, eucuth'cs, panners,
shareholders, employees, members, and agents ".ho are active in the maDagement of a.a affiliate. The ownership
by one persoD of shares constituting a controlling interest in another penon, or pooling of equipmeDt or income
alDong persons when not for fair market value under an arm's length agreement, shall be a prima facie case tbat
one person controls another person. A person who knowingly enters in.o a joint ,'enture with a persoD who has beeD
con\;cled of a public enlil). crime in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered an affiliate.
r undersland that a "person" as defined in Paragraph 287. 133(1)(e), Florida Statutes, means any natural persoD
or eD'ity organized under Ihe laws of any state or of the United States ".ith the legal power to eater iDto a biDdiDg
Contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision of goods or semces Jet by a public eDtity,
or which otherwise: transacu or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term "penon" iDcludes those
offi~ers, directors, uecuth.cs, panners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents wbo are acth"C iD
managemcnl of an cDlily.1.2.3.4.5.
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSJ!I.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN that on April 12, 2000, at
3:00 PM, at the Purchasing Office, a committee consisting of the Director of OMB,
the County Administrator, the County Attorney and ttle requesting Division
Director or their designees, will open sealed proposals for tne following:
500/0 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND 1000/0 DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE OF GENERAL AVIATION HANGARS AT MARATHON AIRPORT
in exchange for long term leasing privileges.
All proposals must be received by the Purchasing Offic(~, 5100 College Road,
PubliC Service Building, Cross Wing #002, Stock Island, Key West, Aorida 33040
on or before 3:00 PM on April 12, 2000.
Bidders shall submit two (2) signed originals and two (2) :opies of each bid in a
sealed envelope marked "Sealed Bid for Development of Hangars at Marathon
Airport." All bids must remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days.
The Board will automatically reject the proposal of any JJerson or affiliate who
appears on the convicted vendor list prepared by the Department of General
Services, State of Florida, under Sec. 287.133(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1997).
All proposals, including the recommendation of the County Administrator and the
requesting Department Head, will be presented to the Board of County
Commissioners of Monroe County for final awarding or otherwise. The Board
reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waiVE informalities in any or
all proposals, and to readvertise for proposals; and to separately accept or reject
any item or items of proposal and to award and/or negctiate a contract in the
best interest of the County.
A non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting will be held on March 23, 2000, 2 PM at 14
Florida Keys Marathon Airport, 9400 Overseas Highway, Suite 200, Marathon, FL ..c.r
SpeCifications and/or further information may be obtained by contacting Theresa
Cook, 305/289-6060 or email MTHAP@mail.5tate.fl.us
DATED at Key West, Florida, this 1 tI day of March, 2000.
Monroe County pu.-chasing Department
Publication dates
Reporter 3/16-23/00
Ciazen 3/10-17/00
Keynoter 3/11-18/00
!\1ollloe County Florida Keys Marathon Airport
II angar Proposal Speci fications/lnfonnation
A. Project Site and Location: Approximately 6+ aeres in the southwest comer of the
Marathon Aiq1ort. The approximate square footage of land available for hangar
construction is 28,5,000 sq. ft.
B. The feasibility study proposed two phases of construction of hangars.
Approximately 25 in each phase. It also included a mix ofT-hangars, rectangulars
and shades, The phases, the mix and the number of hangars are negotiable and
flexible.
C. Funding for the project can be 50% private investment (Proposals) and 50%
Federal Department of Transportation (FDOT) funding subject to acceptance and
approval of the proposal. All improvements become the property of Monroe
County at completion of construction. And all project costs are subject to Monroe
County purchasing, policy and procedures.
D. ,Consideration wi II be given to proposals willing to fund the project at 100% and
negotiate a buy hack or long tem1 lease option~ 100% funding would minimize
strict adherence to county purchasing, policy and procedures.
E. A lease currently exist with the tenants of four shade hangars that offers the
tenants an enclosure of those shade hangars or something of like value. Please
read the lease carefully, and include in your proposal how this agreement will be
handled. This may be subject to negotiation between the current tenants and
interested parties.
F. Proposals must also contain:
1) How many units will be constructed.
2) How many phases.
3) Cost of completed hangar.
4) Approximate range of hangar rental rates.
5) Maintenance and management costs and plan.
6) How much revenue the county will realize.
7) Fom1s to be completed and accompany Proposal
a Sworn Statement under OrqiI).ance No. 10-1990
b Dl)lg Free workplace Form
c Non/-Collusion Affidavit
G. Included in this packet:
1) Board of County Commissioners Agenda Item Options
2) County Insurance requirements
3) Aircraft Hangar Feasibility Study
4) Current Airport Rates and Charges (Land rate for General
Aviation)
5) "Hangars-On" Lease
6) Public Entities Crime Statement
Memorandum
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Mayor and CommisSioner~Ll--
Peter J Horton ~'\ I
9/2/99
Development Options for a Hangar Facility at the Marathon Airport
Many options exist for the development of this facility, but for the sake of this discussion, I
will outline the three most common forms used by other airports.
I. The County acts as the developer and builds, owns, and rents each hangar
individually,
2. A private developer is chosen through the RFP process. The county only leases
the ground underneath the entire project to this developer who builds the hangars
and rents each hangar individually.
3. A cooperative approach utilizing elements of both options above.. The County
acts as the master developer by installing all of the site work (grading, paving,
drainage and utilities) but allows individuals to construct one or more hangars to
standard specifications.
Option l.is a traditional approach but could be the most problematic for the County. Not only
does rent have to be collected on the ground and each hangar each montlt but the site work
and the hangars themselves will have to be maintained by the Airport Department. Under this
scenario, The County would put up half of the project funds and FDOT supplies the other half.
Opt!on 2.is by far the easiest for the Airport but it does not allow individual ownership of the
hangars. Under this option the project is funded 50% private developer, 50% FDOT
Option 3 is a blend of one and two.1 And is the development approach that we would like to
explore further. The County would still benefit financially because as in option 2. Above, the
development costs would be shared 50/50 by FDOT and each individual hangar developer. In
addition, the Airport would receive rental income. Construction and maintenance standards
would have to be uniform and rigid, so perhaps a cooperative association of owners would
have to be formed.
~ .
l.
REVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR OPTION I, PHASE I
COMPLETED PROJECT REVENUES
75%
BUILDING HANGAR NUMBER BASE MONTHLY SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL OCCUPANCY'
TYPE TYPE OF UNITS RENT PER UNIT MONTHLY ANNUAL FACTOR
C T-S HAD E 5 170.00 850.00 10,200.00 7,650.00
0 R-SHADE 4 320.00 1,280.00 15,360.00 11,520.00
E T-HANGAR 8 250.00 2,000.00 24,000.00 18,000.00
F R-HANGAR 6 380.00 2,280.00 27,360.00 20,520.00
TOTALS 23 6,410.00 76,920.00 57,690.00
COMPLETED PROJECT EXPENSES
COST TO CONSTRUCT PHASE 1
less FAA portion
160,425.00 x 90%
subtotal
1,323,250.00
(144,382.00)
1,178,868.00
PORTION FUNDED BY FOOT
589,434.00
PORTION FUNDED BY THE AIRPORT
589,434.00
EXPENSES THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDEO TO THE BASE
MONTHLY RENTAL FEE: Utilities
Maintenance
Administrative fees
THESE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES WILL INCREASE THE BASE RENTAL BY 30%
PJHlbev
2..
MARA THOf\{;I":ti~~gA~:99~T ESTI~rE
. . .... ...:~~~~~~~}y~,:_;,:,,;:), .'.,.' '!i'i :,!,;.
~escri tion~.l~en'
BUILDINGS:
Building "C" 170
Building "0" 180
Building "E" 260
Building "P 270
Sub- Total Buildings
,
.
~/~Descn tion~Area$
FOUNDATIONS: ,
Compacted Umerock Fill . 33,930.00
Reinf. Concrete Foundations 33,930.00
36 6,120.00 $9.65 $59,058.00
41 7,380.00 $11.50 $84,870.00
36 9,360.00 $13.70 $128,232.00
41 11,070.00 $14.20 $157,194.00
33,930.00 $429,354.00
~Des-cntion~~~m:~ft l~OstJL:E.~~-";tLtltal!Costm:la
UTILITIES: '
Potable Water
Electricity & Ughting
Wash Water & Equipment
Storm Drainage System
Taxiways (FAA) 25' wide
TaxhNays(HangarEntrance25~
Sub-Total Foundations
Sub- Total Utilities
1.5
0.5
1,885.00
628.33
$35.00
$220.00
$65,975.00
$138,233,33
$204,208.33
1,500.00
3,000.00
750.00
750.00
1,380.00
960.00
$5.00
$36.00
$45.00
$35.00
$116.25
$116.25
$7,500.00
$108,000.00
$33,750.00
$26,250.00
,$160,425.00
$111,600.00
$447,525.00
3.
REVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR OPTION I, PHASE 2
COMPLETED PROJECT REVENUES
75%
BUILDING HANGAR NUMBER BASE MONTHLY SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL OCCUPANCY
TYPE TYPE OF UNITS RENT PER UNIT MONTHLY ANNUAL FACTOR
A T-SHADE 9 170.00 1,530.00 18,360.00 13,770.00
B R-SHADE 7 320.00 2,240.00 26,880.00 20,160.00
G T-HANGAR 8 250.00 2,000.00 24,000.00 18,000.00
H R-HANGAR 6 380.00 2,280.00 27,360.00 20,520.00
TOTALS 30 8,050.00 96,600.00 72,450.00
COMPLETED PROJECT EXPENSES
COST TO CONSTRUCT PHASE 2
less FM portion
140,081.00 X 90%
1,334,115.00
(126,072.00 )
1,208,043.00
PORTION FUNDED BY FOOT
604,021.50
PORTION FUNDED BY THE AIRPORT
604,021.50
EXPENSES THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDED TO THE BASE
MONTHL Y .RENTAL FEE: Utilities
Maintenance
Administrative fees
THESE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES WILL INCREASE THE BASE RENTAL BY 30%
I I
PJHlbev
. ./'
4.
MARATHON -T-HA~GAR:COSTEST'MAn:
. (PHASE:2) ,., . ...
~escri lion~erj lhl>P~Widlh~.6lal'S .l'<F.llISWdsUS. OEI!!l.lmlW.6ta1nbSll!al
BUILDINGS:
'7<
Building "A" 330 36 11,880.00 $9.65 $114,642.00
Building "B" 320 41 13,120.00 $11.50 $150,880.00
Building "G" 230 36 8,280.00 $13.70 $113,436.00
Building "H" 225 41 9,225.00 $14.20 $130,995.00
Sub- Total Buildings 42,505.00 $509,953.00
,
~"",,,Oescli lidn~ArealS ::Et:IOe llJ1'<--F.t.'GVdIUitiem.Y_il:moSUc.Y~.6lal(cdSt_
FOUNDA liONS: '
Compacted Umerock Fill. - 42,505.00 1.5 2,361.39 $35.00 $82.648.61
Reinl. Concrete Foundations 42,505.00 0.5 787.13 $220.00 $173,168.52
Sub-Total Foundations
$255,817.13
~eSi:ritiOrit>&\5!l'r~~"-~~dSt1l!F..~:OlaltCOSlli1G
UTILITIES:
Potable Water
Electricity & Ughting
Wash Water & Equipment
Storm Drainage System
Taxiways (FAA) 25' wide
Taxiways (Hangar Entrance 25'W)
500.00
1,200.00
750.00
300.00
1,205.00
810.00
$5.00
$36.00
$45.00
$35.00
$116.25
$116.25
$2,500.00
$43,200.00
$33,750.00
$10,500.00
$140,081.25
$94,162.50
Sub- Total Utilities
$324,193.75
TOTAL>P.HASE"!&!2~~~~~'65?ffi66,oB.
s.
REVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR OPTION I, PHASE I AND 2
COMPLETED PROJECT EXPENSES
75%
BUILDING HANGAR NUMBER BASE MONTHLY SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL OCCUPANCY
TYPE TYPE OF UNITS RENT PER UNIT MONTHLY ANNUAL FACTOR
A&C T-S HAD E 14 170.00 2,380.00 28,560.00 21,420.00
B&D R-S HAD E 11 320.00 3,520.00 42,240.00 31,680.00
G&E T-HANGAR 16 250.00 4,000.00 48,000.00 36,000.00
H&F R-HANGAR 12 380.00 4,560.00 54,720.00 41,040.00
TOTALS 53 14,460.00 173,520.00 130,140.00
COST TO CONSTRUCT PHASE I AND 2
less FAA Portion
300,506.00 X 90%
COMPLETED PROJECT EXPENSES
2,657,365.00
(270,455.00)
PORTION FUNDED BY FOOT
2,386,910.00
PORTION FUNDED BY THE AIRPORT
1,193,455.00
1,193,455.00
EXPENSES THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDED TO THE BASE
MONTHLY RENTAL FEE: Utilities
Maintenance
Administrative fees
THESE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES WILL INCREASE THE BASE RENTAL BY 30%
PJHlbev
. /'
(p,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: 12/8/99
12/9/99
DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BULK ITEM: NO
DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion of options to develop a General Aviation Hangar Facility at the Florida Keys
Marathon Airport, and approval to advertise a Req~est for Proposals (RFP) for the development of the project.
ITEM BACKGROUND: A feasibility study has been completed for this project, and an application for a major conditional
use permit is well underway. Staff has explored several different development options for this proposed facility. As per the
direction of the BOCC, revenue projections for option # 1 (as per the memo of 9/2/99, attached) have been completed.
However, staff still recommends the cooperative or group approach suggested in option # 3 (as per the same memo).
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCe ACTION: Discussed at the meetings of 7/21/99 and 9/8/99.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval to advertise a (RFP) for a Co-Op, or Corporation of Hangar Owners to construct
hangars to standard specifications.
TOTAL COST: Phase 1- 23 hangars $1,323,250
Phase 11- 30 hangars $1,334,115
BUDGETED: N/A at this time
COST TO AIRPORT: Potentially none with partiCipation from the private sector and the Florida Department of
Transportation
COST TO COUNTY: None
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes
AMOUNT PER YEAR: $50,000 to $60,000 per year, per phase
APPROVED BY:. County Attorney N/A
OMBlPurchasing N/A
Risk Management N/A
~
Peter J. Horton
DIRECTOR APPROVAL
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
To Follow
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM #
-:::s- - ~
DISPOSITION:
Ibev
APB
/
( ...
MONROE COF~TY, FLORIDA
RlSK !\fANAGEMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURES
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
MANUAL
Introduction
to
Airpo rt! Aircraft Activities
.' . Section
This section of the manual "ill appl)' to those acti vi ti es which are associated "ith, or conqucted
at the County's Airpons, or involve Aircraft Activities. The types and amounts ofinsw-ance will.
be determined based on the type of activit)' and its projected coS!. The fact that the funds used to
pay for the activity were obtained from Federal, State, or other grants is not material.
~~;~~:Y~l ~~h;:C~~O~~~~~:;~~~~~~~~~~~;d ~:eb~;;;;~~o:1 ~e fovemed ~v the ~ection
A special matrix of acth;ties has been developed and incorporated "ithin this section to assist in
the establishment of the proper insurance coverages and limits.
As a general rule, all contracts will include:
· Indemnification and Hold HarnlIess Pro\"isions
· General Insurance Requirements
· \Vorkers' Compensation Provisions
· General Liability Provjsions
· Vehicle Liability ProvIsions
and
· Airport or Aircraft Liability Provisions
Questi~ns should be directed to Risk J..1anagement at (305) 292-4542.
II
I
1996 Edilion
(
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONTRACT
BETWEEN
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
Prior to the commencement of work governed by this contract, the Contractor shall obtain
Workers' Compensation Insurance with limits sufficient to respond to the applicable state
statutes.
In addition, the Contractor shall obtain Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less
than:
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by Accident
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by Disease, policy limits
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by Disease, each employee
Coverage shall be maintained throughout the entire tenn of the contract.
Coverage shall be provided by a company or companies authorized to transact business in the
state of Florida
If the Contractor has been approved by the Florida's Department of Labor, as an authorized self-
insurer, the County shall recognize and honor the Contractor's status. The Contractor may be
required to submit a Letter of Authorization issued by the Department of Labor and a Certificate
of Insurance, providing detail~ on the Contractor's Excess Insurance Program.
If the Contractor Participates in a self-insurance fund, a Certificate of Insurance will be required.
In addition, the Contractor may be required to submit updated financial statements from the fund
upon request from the County.
"
I
WC3
Administration Instruction
#4709.2
90
1996 Edition
C.
VEHICLE LIABILITY
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONTRACT
BETWEEN
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
Recognizing that the work governed by this contract requires the use of vehicles, the Contractor,
prior to the commencement of work, shall obtain Vehide Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be'
maintained throughout the life of the contract and include, as a minimum, liability coverag~ for:
· Owned, Non-Owned, and Hired Vehides
The minimum limits acceptable shall be:
$1,000,000 Combined Single Limit (CSL)
If split limits are provided, the minimum limits acceptable shall be:
$ 500,000 per Person
$1,000,000 per Occurrence
$ 100,000 Property Damage
The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as Additional Insured on
all policies issued to satisfy,the above requirements.
"
I I
I
(
\.
VL3
Administration Instruction
#4709.2
83
C",,'.',
\,'
'..i:.. '
1996 Edition
GENERAL LIABILITY
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
.
CONTRACT
BETWEEN
1\10NROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
Prior to the commencement of wo"rk governed by this contract, the Contractor shall obtain
General Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be maintained throughout the life of the contract and
include, as a minimum:
"
· Premises Operations
· Products and Completed Operations
· Blanket Contractual Liability
· Personal Injury Liability
· Expanded Definition of Property Damage
.'
The minimum limits acceptable shall be:
$1,000:000 Combined Single Limit (CSL).
-
If split limits are provided, the minimum limits acceptable shall be:
$ 500,000 per Person
$ 1,000,000 per Occurrence
$ 100,000 Property Damage
An Occurrence Form policy,is preferred. If coverage is provided on a Claims Made policy, its
provisions should include coverage for claims filed on or after the effectiye date of this contract,
In addition, the period for which claims may be reported should extend for a minimum of twelve
(12) months following the acceptance of work by the County.
The ~onroe County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as Additional Insured on
ail policies issued to satisfy the above requirements.
.~..
I I
I
GL3
Administration Instruction
#14709.2
56
('..
't'
MOJ\ROE COUNTYMOt\ROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RISK MANAGEMENT
POLICY AND P.ROCEDURES
CONtRACT ADMINISTRATION.
~ . . ,. ~ . .. . ~ I
, 'MANUAL. -
..." :~.; ~.a ;' .', ~-:o
Indemnification and Hold Harmless,
:;. for AiiportJAircfaffActi"ities'H_.tI~
'iC!
.,
.. -:. ,:.:...-" ;-:'~'~''';'t
The Vendor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Monroe County Board of
County Commissioners from any and all claims for bodily injury (including death), personal
injwy, and property damage (including property ovmed by Monroe County) and any other losses,
damages, and expenses (including attorney's fees) which arise out of, in connection with, or by
reaso~. of sernces provided by the Vendor or any of its Contractors; occasioned by the '.
negligence, errors, or other wrongful act or omission of the Vendor or its Contractor(s), therr
employees, or agents.
The e>..1ent ofliability is in no way limited to, reduced, or lessened by the insurance requirements
contained elsewhere within this agreement.
I'
I I
I
Am
100
. I.
- f
I
f
[
[
[
Monroe County Aviation Department
-
Marathon T -Hangar Feasibility Study
URS Greiner Contract No. C50003623.16
Prepared for
Marathon Airport
March, 1999
I
Prepared by
URSGreiner
,Miami, Florida
I
r
r
r
r
r
r
f
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MARATHON T-HANGAR FEASIBILITY STUDY
MARATHON AIRPORT
MONROE COUNTY
1.0 INTR.O D U CTI ON ...... ..-... ............... .... ............... .................................................... 1
1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED ...................................................................,........... 1
1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................... 2
1.2.1 Short Term ...................................................................................... 2
1.2.2 Long Tenn ...................................................................................:.~. 2
1.3 SCO PE OF WO RK ....... .............................................................................. 2
1.4 REFERENCE DEVELOP.MENT STANDARDS ...................................... 2
1.5 GENERAL LA YOUT ................................................................................ 3
2.0 AVAILABLE PRE-CONSTRUCTED HANGARS .............................................. 4
2.1 Erec-A - Tube Hangars ................................................................................ 4
2.2 Pascoe Hangars ............ ....... ...................................................... ................ 4
2.3 Strat -O-Span Hangars .............................................. ................................. 4
2.4 Aircraft Not Served ...... ................... .......................................................... 5
3.0 BlJILDING CODE REQlJIRE1ffiNTS ................................................................. 5
3.1 Wind Design Criteria ................................................................................. 5
3.2 Set Back Criteria ........................................................................................ 6
3.3 Permitting Process and Documents ........................................................... 6
3.4 FEMA Requirements .......... ........................ .... .......... ........ ..... ...... ..... ......... 6
4 .0 AIRPORT REQ lJIREMENTS .............................................................................. 7
4.1 Amendment to the Major Conditional Use Permit ................................ 7
4 .2 Utility Requirements ................................................................ ..... ............ 7
4.3 Security Requirements ...........................:.:................................................. 8
4.4 Parking Req uirem~nts ................. .................. ..... ....... ........ ........ ................ 8
5.0 EXISTING HANGARS AT OTHER AIRPORTS ............................................... 8
5.1 T amiami Airport .......... ...... ............ ......... ....... ......... ............. ..................... 8
5.2 Homestead General Hangars .............................................................................. .9
j
I
I
r
6.0
7.0
8.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
MARATHON T -HANGAR FEASmILITY STUDY
MARATHON AIRPORT
MONROE COUNTY
PRE-F AB HANGARS PRICE ESTIMA1'ES ....................................................... 9
6.1 T -Hangars .................... ............................................ .................... ............. 9
6.2 Ranch Hangars ...................................... ................ ......... ................. ..... ....". 9
PRICE ANALYSIS ................... ............. ........ ......... ............... ........... ........ ............ 9
SUMMARy
.................... .................. ...... ........................... ..... ... .................... ....... ......... .......... .....
10
I I
ii
J
. I
I
I
J
I
I
I
T - HANGAR FEASIBILITY STUDY
MARATHON AIRPORT
MONROE COUNTY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Marathon Airport is owned by Monroe County and operated by the Board of County
Commissioners through the County's Community Services Division. The day to day operation is
the responsibility of the Marathon Airport Manager who reports to the Director of Airports and
the Monroe County Director of Community Services. An Airport Layout Plan has been included
as Figure 1.0.
Marathon Airport is home to approximately 59 based aircraft of which nine are multi-engine, one
is a turbojet, and one is a turbojet powered helicopter. Although the high cost of ownership of
general aviation aircraft has been a major cause in the slow growth in the numbers of GA aircraft
both locally and nationally, it has been this same high replacement costs and high maintenance
costs that have driven many owners to protect their aircraft from the inclement of time and
weather by means of enclosed and shade hangars.
..
1.1 PURPOSE AND NEEDS
According to the ALP Narrative Report of December 1997 a slow growth of based aircraft is
expected through the year 2005 when compared with year 2000. This growth is estimated at 7
additional aircraft or 1.12% for the 5 years. However, intenerent GA aircraft have been
substantially increasing, specially during the seasonal peak periods which has presently been
observed at about 30 or more aircraft and is expected to grow to about 40 more aircraft by year
2000. This means that an additional 40 aircraft parking positio~ may be needed.
Meetings with the local pilots and aircraft owners and the FEO's have reflected an increasing
desire a'ld need for hangars, specially enclosed hangars. Demand is such that the local FBO's
have expressed their desire and willingness to lease or rent blocks of 6 to 8 enclosed hangars
from the airport to meet their clients needs. Movement of the' based aircraft from the open
parking aprons will accomplish both providing adequate services and facilities for the local
aircraft owners and liberating open air parking space for transient and intenerent aircraft. This
accomplishes protecting the based aircraft and keeping the owners from seeking alternative
airports who can provide these facilities and at the same time draws new based aircraft from
airports such as Key West International providing much needed space at Key West during
seasonal peak periods.
I
...!- .
I 1111 (-\ ii
1 ~~ Ii U ~
~ l mill U 0 m i - .10+ ~
u
~ J J i i
f II II n I I I i I dl
II I i III r r I II u d I,
i
~ - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ b ~
Nv Jd
mOA Vl .l}JOd}JIV
! ~ I II i I --
11,1 did " I !l !,llll n~
I A ~ I ~ j ~ ~ AI I I ~ 'll
.eeeeeeee@@@@@@@@
i I! : fll II II ,Ii If Ililfl f r ' "
I ~I ! IIi 'III :II: Hll'id I
~ I hi! 1111, 11111111,' i :~i: H~
· II ill,l, !l! il II; 1111111 lI!ill ;:1
U ul f d~ i, IIi I ~~ !!!! ~IQih R II
I , I I , , " I It' t
...
,.~
I_i-
II ~~S
1m
~
..
o
z
i
!I,
mi
I ~ ~~ 5 II II /; ~ - ~
n ~lIt R ~ 'I ~ r J h J
:~ I e~ E Ie;!/; w
i I ~ f~ 5 fl. : !2 ~ ~ I~ Ii 1l~1 ~ I
.... at ~t1'; i.. IBE z r It It
~ I ;j' ~- Ii II 0
~ ! f r ~ s; (3 I II I I~~ fi
Ii I! 1 g~ I~ l!1 ~ I 5.: l:!
~ I I. I q:a ~ ..!! I~ S lIel ~. H n
~f5I1PI~g~~ !;E/;I~ IIlg;
IIJ i If II ~ j~ If l'lh~ ~ 1III
flu 1111 ~ I k fh i1 L _ ..
~ II % 2 IS II dh J~ I 5 1 n
s .. 0'5 122
~11I!2 !1I1.hdll5fl!!
~ - ~~U'5IB B
~ II
i ! f i 1('1
· I Iii, l' i 111,l IPlI
IIlId.lllllldlllllllll
nil 1I11111nll( I
,.,11-rl.ll.
!
I
i
-~~.--'~~i~Jj "
110:1 CDWBlId ~
o
.
I,i.
I!i~
daY
~ Ii
:J .
(') I
G: I
I
~. , .'
..._---~-.- -.-
'tm
i Jli~
Ii' I
!n~
1 .,11
~ I III 'I
~ I! i I ~ lid
"I. I}~ l!
I Il,. ,;
i~
it
Ii
n
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
r
I
1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1.2.1 Short Term
A site layout ofT-hangars, Ranch hangars and access taxiways has been
developed. These have also been divided into shade hangars and enclosed
hangars. The site layout will pursue the best utilization ofIand with the highest
density of aircraft storage per acre and the lowest requirement for paved access
per aircraft storage unit. For the short term, hangar and taxiway development
shall be programed on a demand basis with approximately 8 to 14 enclosed
units and 5 to 9 shade units in two to four Structures to be constructed at a time.
1.2.2 Long Term
Depending on demand and actual occupation of the hangars the balance of the
project can be built. By year 2003 an additiona116 enclosed units and 14 shade
hangars can be constructed in four more structures. A total of 50 to 54 aircraft
parking areas (enclosed and shade) could be available in eight structures.
1.3 SCOPE OF WORK
URS Greiner, Inc. has been retained to conduct the planning and permitting of aircraft storage
facilities at Marathon Airport. The storage facilities will consist of joined rectangular hangar
and/or T-Hangar spaces (probably two sizes). Some spaces will be enclosed hangars while
others will be shade hangars. This report defmes or assumes the following:
· Land use and proposed hangar and access pavement layouts for future design
and construction.
· Total development costs for site preparation and hangars.
· That a major conditional use permit will be obtainable for the complete build-
out construction and use of the future hangar, development area.
· Pre-manufactured off-the-shelf hangars will be used.
1.4 REFERENCE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
I I
General Aviation airport development standards are shown in Table 1.1. The table presents U.S.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dimensional criteria for ADG-I and ADG-2 aircraft
which are the aircraft that MTH serves. However, only ADG-I aircraft will use the hangar
complex. Taxilanes within the hangar complex will be design to ADG-I criteria. ADG-II criteria
will be observed between Taxiway "A" and the Hangar Complex and its taxilanes.
2
.
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Table 1.1
-
--
25 35
Taxiway Width
Taxiway Centerline to
Parallel Taxilane Centerline
Taxiway centerline to
Fixed or Movable Object
Taxilane Centerline to
Parallel Taxilane Centerline
Taxilane centerline to
Fixed or Movable Object
Taxiway Object Free Area Width
Taxilane Object Free Area Width
Runway Obstacle Free Zone
Sources: FAA ACI5015300-13, Airport Design
1.5 GENERAL LAYOUT
69
44.5
64
39.5
57.5
105
65.5
97
o. .
The 1997 Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report presented a future T -Hangar layout plan (Figure
1.1) with the hangar buildings and access taxilanes running perpendicular to Taxiway "A". It
was later detennined that a more effiCient and dense aircraft storage per acre occurred with a
layout running the hangar buildings and taxilane parallel to. Taxiway "A" (Figure 1.2). This
layout also incurred in less taxilan~ ~pace than the previous layout. An added benefit is that the
hangar doors will not face the prevailing winds and aircraft taxing on the taxilanes will do so
either in headwinds or tailwinds reducing the amount of crosswind buffeting that can occur.
89
79
250
131
115
250
This is the preferred layout for all the hangars, since this would result in a layout with only a 5
ft. violation to the taxiway obstruction free area. The other layouts resulted in larger
penetrations. URS Greiner will request a FAA Part 77 diviation for the 5 ft. Taxiway OF A
penetration. To facilitate identification of the buildings throughout this report we have initially
named the hangars in a left to right, top to bottom sequence. Being A and B the far left hangars,
3
--,. -
H .J..:::l::Jn'='l 11111 10
0=
~
Id
VCDlO1:f ' AlNlO:) :J01NOW
.L1!Od}llV NOHJ. VWW
N\fld J.nOA \fl 8\fON\fH-.L
't- .
W<( I
-----------------,
,--- -----______________.1
(..9m >- I
J- _r1:::j .-- -r--
<(:r <( IlXly ICD
I (- i..r r-I,..__
3 II I~.r 1'-1 C'
~u 'I - -rL. ) ~ II)
- I iCD I ,..-- .,..
<(J- X I - ..r1- I '-1 U
"I(e> III) I l..t
~<( <( 'I --1~-r) ~-- g
OU J- II I - i..r1- I t1 ,." c
r II ( I ,." I ,..-- IT
I - -t~UI 1-1 ' '"
I -t. ' t-. qj---
I .- ..r
r '-~ '-
\ j t:L.J ( ~..._=
---..... ..... - _.I ~ lo::
-- -ila-- 11110
--I -[-- t I~~
) (- -r1:;I 1 -...r==
I ilXl I J 1 I CD
I I (- ..r1- . r-I,..__
I ~ '-1
817 I III CD I ,
I II [~1fl: I d~
I II ootl )1'=-1
I 1 -~s1- I ,~
I( I,." Q--
- L.J-), I N
I NI ~
yee I I -~~:J-- I '-1:-
o t:LJ- - - -l
I N '---
I
I ~ (
D- j I
<( ~ ,
D- . :t
to 7 .gOI .O~I J:Tl- - - -r---.t
,- '-r
. - {L..r) I r-I,..__ f
> ~ N I ~ f
- i..r1- I N
W 'I (u I,.".r ,~,..--
--1 I _ -rL. I '=-1 k
I oot I) 1 ,." ,
w 1-1~ I, . -is1- r-'~--l
1/ >- ~.I II) I ~
0 '" I-! t: n.t~~ ...1"
::! 1/ >- 1) '--- :t
I- ~__
---..... --10 (I~ijll
~ lil ~.::.... I :-::= ~ f t L~~.JI
~ (0 I ,..--
i!I: N '1 I
.~~ ~ I .gZ I I <JF::-P I ~ ... I
~ .~.. II I t-L.J- I ~--
I 0 I II IN I) IN
~ I I , (-If.r1- . jj-__ i
I
I ~I -.:J-S-r) I ~:
lil -' I
I
I
- I I. (-i.r1-' I "It
I W I
I i ..:! -t~./- I ~--
, 0::: I
I iCDI) III)
~-------I- ,
I - ..r1- ~
_1- --I ( I ~ . ~--
I \ - -{L.J-) I 'CD
I I I \
I , lXl I ~
I I I ,- - i-.r1- ~--
I I \
I I I \ I OJ, I ~
I I t:Lr- - - ...J,-__
I I I
1.-- __.J \ I I I I I'
f
.,
I
J
1
I
I
I
,
I
C and D the center left hangars, E and F the center right hangars, and G and H the far right
hangars.
The airport has also expressed their desire to have a mix of different types of hangars (shade v,
enclosed). The initial planning in this report has identified one possible combination as follows:
Hangar A - shade hangars with a T configuration (10 airplanes), Hangar B _ shade hangars with
a clear span configuration (7 airplanes), Hangar C - shade hangars with a T configuration (5
airplanes), Hangar D - shade hangars with a clear span configuration (4 airplanes), Hangar E,
fully inclosed hangars with a T configuration (8 airplanes), Hangar F _ fully inclosed hangars
with a clear span configuration (6 airplanes), Hangar G - fully inclosed hangars with aT
configuration (7 airplanes), Hangar H - fully inclosed hangars with a clear span configuration (5
airplanes). Clear Span hangars will later be referred to as R-Hangars (ranch or rectangular) for
reasons of clarity. However, any combination of shade and enclosed hangars can be cons1n.!cted
as long as they are not mixed within a same building. The final combination will be more
dependant on the demand for a particular type of hangar.
2.0 A V AILABLE PRE-CONSTRUCTED HANGARS
We have conducted a review of the off-the-shelfhangars available, narrowing the possibilities
to three manufactnrers: Erec-A-Tube, Pascoe Building Systems and Strat-Q-Span. Due to the
size and configuration of the access taxiIanes and the size of the lot, we have found that only the
fOllOwing hangar sizes can be accommodated while optimizing the amount of hangars that
would fit in the lengths and widths available between access taxilanes.
2.1 Erec-A - Tube Hangars: Out of Harvard, Illinois since 1963, provides mostly enclosed T-
Hangars and Clear Span Hangars (R-Hangars or Ranch Hangars). They have their own
proprietary Bi-Fold Hangar Door which they market with the hangars. Erec-A- Tube
hangars are presently designed for 120 mph snstained maximum winds, in accordance to
. the ASCE-7-93. Although Erec-A- Tube provides many sizes of hangars to accommodate
diversified fleets the following sizes are best suited for MTH.
S36-42 (36' D x 41.5' W with/12' CH) T-Hangars
R41-45 (41' D x 44.5' W with 14' CH) Clear Span Hangar
2.2 Pascoe Hangars: Out of COlumbus, Georgia was once considered one of the leaders in
the hangar building industry. During the course of this study Pascoe went out of business
and their hangars are no longer available.
2.3 Strat-O-Span Hangars: Out of Breese, Illinois specializes in wood frame buildings and
hangars, but they also manufactw-e all steel buildings. Their hangars are available with
4
I
I
I
1
I
I
electrical bi-fold doors. Strat-O-Span hangars are designed for 115 mph sustained
maximum winds, in accordance to the ASCE-7-93.. Although they also provide many
sizes of hangars to accommodate diversified fleets the following sizes are best suited for
MTH.
T-Hangar - (3 I' D x 45' W with 10' CH) T - Hangar
VP Style - (40' D x 50' W with 12' CH) Clear Span Hangar (R-Hangars)
2.4 Aircraft Not Served
Due to the sizes and characteristics of the hangars and the desire to optimize the use of
the available space, we have found that the following ADG-l aircraft would not fit in the
proposed hangar configurations:
Type
1. DHC-2 Beaver
2. Lapan XT -400
3. Piazio P-166 Portofmo
4. Beech Airliner C-99
5. Beech King Air B-I00
6. Beech King Air F-90
7. Cessna Citation I
8. Cessna Titan 404
9. Embraer -121 Xingu
10. Hamilton Westwind II
11. Piper 400LS Cheyenne
12. Rockwell 690A Turbo Comdr.
13. Swearinger Merlin 3B
14.SwearingerMetro
15. Volpar Turbo 18
3.0 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTs
I I
3.1. Wind Design Criteria:
Wing Span
Length
Tail Height
48.0'
47.9'
47.2'
45.9'
45.8
45.9'
47.1'
46.3'
47.4'
46.0'
47.7'
46.5'
46.2'
46.2'
46.0'
43.5'
14.1'
16.4'
14.4'
15.3'
14.4'
14.3'
15.9'
45.0'
43.4'
44.3'
42.2'
59.4'
37.4'
17.0'
14.9'
16.7'
16.7'
The County follows ASCE-7-95 for their wind design requirements which states 150
mph winds with 3 second gusts. According to this code, we have calculated that the
equivalent sustained wind at 30 feet above ground level is approximately 127.5 mph.
The manufacturer of the buildings will need to design the hangars in accordance to
the new code or request a waiver to the Building Department based on the original
design computations that are in accordance to ASCE-7-93. _
5
I
I
I
I
I
r
r
[
r
3.2. Set Back Criteria:
Set back criteria for the Airport is 200 feet. None of the structures at the airport
comply with this setback criteria. A waiver may be requested and most likely will be
granted. However, if a waiver is requested the major conditional use permit would go
to the Development Review Committee first, and then it would go to the Planning
Committee who will conduct a public hearing on the issue before approval. It would
be more convenient to r~q~est an amendment to the existing terminal major
conditional use permit.
3.3. Permitting Process and Documents:
r
I
The following will be required for the permitting process;
a. Completed building permit application with Fee($1,500.00). Fee may be
waived.
b. Site Plan.
c. Electric meter location letter.
d. Authorization from Aqueduct Authority.
e. One original and two copies of sealed survey.
f. SFWMD exemption letter.
g. Three sets of sealed and signed plans.
h. Letter from Airport Manager.
I. Phasing plan to show construction build phases.
The following must be clearly marked on the plans:
a Natural grade taken from survey before any fill is placed.
b. Elevation of ground slabs.
c. Overall height of buildings (not to exceed 35' from crown of road).
d. Setbacks from property lines to structures.
e. Total square footage of buildings.
f. Site drainage/calculations.
g. Fire marshal approval.
h. Occupancy an&or tenant use (if any).
3.4. FEMA Requirements:
FEMA requirements have been initially coordinated with Mrs. Diane Bear, the FEMA
Representative at Monroe County. The following has been coordinated with Mrs. Bear:
a All enclosed hangars would be required to be elevated to the AE-7 bas~ flood
elevation of seven (7) feet. However, a variance to locate the floor elevation of the
6
. I
I
I
I
I
hangar at six (6) feet may be granted.
b. The inclosed hangars will require a vent size of I sq.-in. per every I sq.-ft of hangar
space. Vents need to be 1 foot above grade level (or at the AE-7 base flood elev. of7
feet), and a min. of2 vents are required on opposite walls.
c. No mechanical, plumbing or electrical fixtures are allowed below the flood level
elevation (7 feet).
r
l
d. Absolutely no variance or .waiver allowed for flood level elevation. ('This is the flood
level and not the floor level).
e. Since enclosed hangars are free standing buildings we will need to solicit a variance
or waiver for having the lowest graded point on the floor one foot below the AE-7<level.
They normally approve this.
The lowest area in the grass is approximately at elevation 4.1' ms!. We have assumed that
1.5 feet of limerock fill will be required to elevate the lowest ground elevation to
elevation 5.s feet and the construction of a 6 inch thick concrete foundation slab would
bring the final floor elevation to the 6 foot elevation.
4.0 AIRPORT REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Amendment to the Major Conditional Use Permit:
Airport Management has stated that the major conditional use permit or an
amendment to it should cover the T-Hangars, service road, FBO hangar, Sheriffs
hangar and apron expansions projects. The FBO (paradise Aviation) hangar will be
100' W x 150' L The Sheriff's hangar will be 10Q' x 100'.
4.2 Utility Requirements:
Each enclosed T-Hangarand R-Hangar will be equipped with a power receptacle
and interior lighting. The power circuit for each hangar needs to be designed to
handle the electrical motor for the Bi-Fold door should the incumbent decide to
I
install the motor and meCanism. Shade hangars will have common power receptacles
at strategic locations (probably one for each four hangars). Power circuits can be
extended to the facilities from feeder service located along US I. Exterior lighting
will be provided for the taxilanes from the top of the hangar buildings by means of
directed spotlights.
Potable water will be brought to the washracks. A 4" dia water main exits close to
the fire house for connection of the potable water system. This water main should
provide adequate water pressure to the washrack areas. -
7
I
f
r
[
The hangars will not require any sanitary sewer facilities, since restrooms will not be
provided.
The storm sewer system will be kept to a minimum needed by using the green areas
between each hangar access strip as a percolation area for runoff. However, a
washrack area will have to be provided so that owners can wash aircraft and so that
wash water and contaminants can be collected and processed before disposal. A
possible location for the washrack could be between buildings B & D and buildings
F & H between the hangars. Aircraft to be washed would be pushed back into these
washracks. Collection of the waters will need to occur at the washrack and
processing of the contaminants by means of oiVwater separator and a sedimentation
trap will need to occur before returning the waters to the ground.
Fire Protection if required, will be installed as per the Monroe County Fire
Department.
4.3 Security Requirements:
The area is protected by a propertylsecurity fence on the south side of the lot. We do
not envision any additional security requirements from what the area presently has.
4.4 Parking Requirements:
Owners and pilots will be able to access the hangars via the southeast gate just south
of the existing shade hangar and by the taxilane up to the individuals hangar.
Common practice at the airport is for the owner to leave the vehicle parked inside the
hangar. However, unless the pilot is accompanied by another adult, this operation
requires the removal of the aircraft from the hangar, leaving the aircraft unattended
while the vehicle is parked inside and blocking the taxilane while the operation is
completed. The reversal happens when the aircraft returns to the hangar. Although
the aircraft traffic at the hangar complex may not be conflictive, it may be in the best
interest of the airport and safety to allow for a prepared parking area inmediatly
south of the existing shade hangar for parking of aircraft owner/pilot vehicles. This
will also reduce the incidence of parking vehicles in the green areas between hangars
during maintenance of the aircraft, a situation w~ch would block the taxilane. Signs
will need to be located at the mouths of the main taxilanes before entering taxiway
"A" restricting access to/authorized vehicles only.
5.0 EXISTING HANGARS AT OTHER AIRPORTS
5.1 Tamiami Airport:
We talked to Carlos Barahona, from Solo Construction (305) 944-3922 about the T-
Hangars built at Tamiami Airport. These started out as PASCOE hangars but the owner
requested that they redesign the hangars for 150 mph winds. The owner later changed his
8
1
,I
1
1
mind (probably due to the fact that PASCOE was unable to design doors for 150 mph
winds) and the hangars were changed to CBS (concrete, block and stucco) with Aero
doors designed for 120 mph winds. Carlos Barahona could not divulge the construction
price of the hangars.
5.2 Homestead General Hangars:
We also talked to Jerry Taramy from Compton Construction, who built the Homestead
General Hangars. These were designed for I 10 mph winds made of concrete block
masonry. The door was the limiting factor again. The hangars were built with concrete
slabs, sliding metal doors, steel bar roof joist, lightweight concrete deck on roof, single
ply roof membrane, block walls, stucco, paint and insulation, based in size to fit a King
Air aircraft. Construction cost was about $93,000 per hangar or about $55 per square
foot.
6.0 PRE-FAB HANGARS PRICE ESTIMATES
6.1 T-Hangars:
Costs for the hangars was established by calling the manufacturers of existing hangars
such as Erect-A-Tube and Pascoe. The average cost was established for an inclosed T-
Hangar at $10.50 per sq.-ft. plus $3.20 per sq.-ft. for erection. The T-Hangar cost
includes doors, trim, partitions and freight but does not include electricity, lights or
other utilities. These other costs have been estimated separately along with the costs of
fill, foundations and other associated costs. The costs for T Shade hangars were
deduced from the costs of full partitioned hangars by eliminating the estimated
partitions and doors. These costs including erection ran on average at $9.65 per sq.-ft.
for the T -Shade hangar.
6.2 Ranch Hangars:
For inclosed Ranch (R) hangars, the average cost was established at $1 1.00 per sq.-ft.
plus $3.20 per sq.-ft. for erection. Again the R-Hangar cost includes doors, trim,
partitions and freight but does not include electricity, lights or other utilities. These
. other costs have been estimated separately along with the costs of fill, foundations and
other associated costs. The costs for Ranch Shade hangars were deduced from the costs
of full partitioned hangars by eliminating the estimated partitions and doors. These
costs including erection ran'dn average at $11.50 per sq.-ft. for the R-Shade hangar
7.0 PRICE ANAL YSIS
The following price analysis establishes the costs of construction for the building, foundations,
utilities, and the cost of the taxilanes. Only essential'utilities were considered. The analysis has
divided the construction costs into two phases (Table 7.1 and Table 7.2) that corre~ond to the
desired construction/erection phases of the project. However, the cost of providing utilities at
9
,
,I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
1
170 36 6,120.00 $9.65 $59,058.00
180 41 7,380.00 $11.50 $84,870.00
260 36 9,360.00 $13.70 $128,232.00
270 41 11,070.00 $14.20 $157,194.00
.,
33,930.00 $429,354.00
BUILDINGS:
Building "C"
Building "0"
Building "E"
Building "P'
Sub-Total Buildings
~Desc::iihtlOtf'~lIrJ !i.
FOUNDATIONS:
Compacted Limerock Fill
Reinf. Concrete Foundations
:..ATe3JS~-m=..ume .th-gF.t!&V.oJuiri~-' II JeOStm.Yi'lLl_ llofal!Cost_
33,930.00
33,930.00
1.5
0.5
1,885.00
628.33
$35.00
$220.00
$65,975.00
$138,233.33
$204,208.33
'__h ,. i' _I .~;lII:l:~~~H ~DstJl!F~~_.Dtal;CoSUlfQl
$7,500.00
$108,000.00
$33,750.00
$26,250.00
$160,425.00
$111,600.00
$447,525.00
Sub-Total Foundations
~fIbDescri'tion~~
UTILITIES:
Potable Water
Electricity & Lighting
Wash Water & Equipment
Storm Drainage System
Taxiways (FAA) 25' wide
Taxiways (Hangar Entrance 25'W)
1,500.00
3,000.00
750.00
750.00
1,380.00
960.00
$5.00
$36.00
$45.00
$35.00
$116.25
$116.25
Sub- Total Utilities
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
,
Table 7.2
MARA THONT7H~N~AR.cOST ESTIMATE
(P"HA~E~ .
, .::;;>T;;n~i::':i::r\
BUILDINGS:
Building "A" 330 36 11,880.00 $9.65 $114,642.00
Building "B" 320 41 13,120.00 $11.50 $150,880.00
Building "G" 230 36 8,280.00 $13.70 $113,436.00
Building "H" 225 41 9,225.00 $14.20 $130,995.00
.
Sub-Total Buildings 42,505.00 $509,953.00
~Des.cri 'tiOi1'H~.t'~'t.ealS" ~-F.U:De -tht=l1F.taV.oliimew~-':<TOSU.G.Y..iI\-..-~otal:COsU"
FOUNDATIONS:
Compacted Limerock Fill
Reinf. Concrete Foundations
42,505.00
42,505.00
1.5
0.5
2,361.39
787.13
$35.00
$220.00
$82,648.61
$173,168.52
Sub-Total Foundations
$255,817.13
~'_Descri ti6i1~~'U;:;.J~~l!~~bSU1!E:~Total:cost=:.,
UTILITIES:
Potable Water
Electricity & Lighting
Wash Water & Equipment
Storm Drainage System
Taxiways (FAA) 25' Wide
Taxiways (Hangar Entrance 25W)
500.00
1,200.00
750.00
300.00
1,205.00
810.00
$5.00
$36.00
$45.00
$35.00
$116.25
$116.25
$2,500.00
$43,200.00
$33,750.00
$10,500.00
$140,081.25
$94,162.50
Sub-Total Utilities
$324,193.75
. I
I
I
r--lOoo:rMO
OJlOr--lOO~
C<Xl COOl CO 0
"OlO"'oo:rNlO
r--COlOMN
:Jo<riOCO(")
co OlCOOl"-N
;:....NMoo:r(")
cnlo'tlo'tlo'tlo't....
o Io't
U
e:OlN(") '<1" 01
... CO '<1" lOt-.
CT-cri~a..o
=CO;~~;;;::
:J~~~~~
~(")(,,)N(,,)M
1Il1o't1o't1o't1o't...
o lilt
U,
I
I
III
o
I-
III
o
I-
I
O"q'"~~<O
C<ONN~~
Cl>Ol<XllOO(")
EOCONCOCO
i5. ("). <Xl_ M_ <0 .-
O(")"-NCDN
(")oo:rt-.CDoo:r
Cl> N
>
Cl>
C
oo:rN(")N...
E\O<'?~CJ)~
Cl>t-."-oco...
E<XlM.-...lO
1i5.<XlN.(")"-.-
..9~~~~~
Cl> N
>
Cl>
C
I
oo:roo:rONO
oo:r<XlOr--o
ltlr--:"':aicri<ri
Cl>lOCOlOoo:rN
:;:;lO'<1"COCDIt)
- "'-<O-M-(") r--
'::;CO<XlM<Ooo:r
-' ...-..-oq-
CO oo:rCOOl <0
CO(")O),,-~
ltl"':ai..,.r--('r;
Cl><Xl'-'-"-0)
;::;<XlQ)"'N~
=N<riNM;;j.
5t-.0)"-CON
(')
'-,
f;'t.
I
I
<">"-MO(")
cnC")COMOM
CMcriC"i.ocxi
O<">"'MNO
-<ooo:rM<ON
~<D.VfOCOoo:r
i:<">oo:rlOCOO
:J N
o
LL.
OCOMMM
cnO~~~,,:
CONMOr--
OOCOMN....
_lO OlCOlO co
~ ...; CO. Ol- lO It)
i:"'r--oo:rlOlO
:J N
~ 5:
;f.
....00000
cnoC!C!C!C!
""8~~~~:ri
"""Ie: co co_ "': 0) 0)
:Ec:;!~~gg
m:ET-..........lt)
I- :J c'.
lD
J
f
_00000
cnoC!C!C!C!
MO<XlON..,...,.
'UlO"-MOllO
,... oo_~N.""'(")
.!!c:Ol"<t"COr--Ol
.c lO<XlNlON
ca32 ...~v
1-3
co
I
IllOlOOlO
Cl>o"-C!"':
L.l/')COlOCO
<(N"<t"N"<t"
T-_ Q)~ ~ CD
-1. ~
I
L.
('0--.-.....-
g
III
::I:
III 0 lO 0 lO ':
Cl>o"':C!"-.,
L.lOCOlOCO
<( N "<t" N oo:ri',
L. "":~,,":col'
ca.........-.-.
C: ;-'
c: q
ctI "!'
~
Cl>
>
<(
Cl> ,
> ,,::'
<( '.,
.,~
C
Q
~
o
-I
OJ
S
:E
:5
-lD
..::g;.E
:0: ~ P ~ ~ ~ C'!
E OlOlClCQ.
"os .s.s.S L. l!!
3:E:g:g;g,s:J
lDci5ci5~~J9~
o CIl
I-Cl>
en
I~ ......
I.... Cl> CIl CIl CIl
I- D "0 Cl cr.
L. <Il III c: c:
Ill.c.cllllll
IOU?U?::I:::I:
~I-a::~ci:
::I:
I I
8 ......
.> CIl CIl CIl CIl . _
I-TITIClO ...
L. III 11l c: c: Q
1ll.c.c11l1ll
oU?U?::I:J: ~
~I-a::~ci: .3
::I: Cl
c:
:!2
:5
CD
ell ...
. - .. - O').E
g.1~~t=~C'!
.E ClClClCQ;
"C .s .S .f: .S L.; l!!
3:g;g;g~.2:J
lD :J :J :J :::l -" Ql
CDlDlDlDJ::!u..
e~
en
,'.
.
.1
I
I
J
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
phase I is higher when compared to phase 2, since the burden of providing the utility mains will
have to be part of phase I construction. For phase 2 the utilities will connect to the established
utility mains and infrastructure at a connection point near the hangars.
The cost of the foundations has been distributed to each hangar building in proportion to the
actual size of the building. As stated before we have assumed that 1.5 feet ofIimerock fill will
be required to elevate the lowest hangar floor ievel to the 5.5 feet elevation and the COnstruction
of a 6 inch thick concrete foundation slab will complete the height needed. The top of the slab
would be at 6 foot MSL elevation.
The cost of utilities have been distributed to each hangar building based on the proportional cost
of the building itself compared to the total phase costs. This reflects the added light fixtures,
electrical outlets and amenities for the inclosed hangars. The shade hangars would have
common use light fixtures, electrical outlets and potable water.
The cost of the taxilanes and the lead-in taxilanes have also been distributed to each hangar
based on the proportional cost of the building itself compared to the total phase cost. Although
the common use taxilanes can be federally fimded, we have left the cost in as if they are airport
funded in order to calculate a worst case scenario.
We have estimated that it is posible and feasable to recover the costs of this project within a 120
month (10 year) period by means of reutal fees. However, the owner may need to fuctor in other
costs such as fmancing (interest cost) or insurance costs, any maintenance and operations costs.
However, it is also understood that if part of the project costs are to be subsidized by FDOT
and/or FAA, then these costs could be reduced in accordance to FOOT's I FAA's participation
in the project.
8.0 SUM11AR Y
The development of both types of Hangars (f & R) at Marathon is both physically and
financially feasable. These can be combined into enclosed or shade hangars so that airport
clients have a greater selection to chose from and can accomodate their needs to their budget.
Our preliminary estimates show that based on a 120 month period for recovery of costs and
using the worst case scenario (no FAA or FOOT participation) the rental fees for each type of
building would be approximately: I I
Hangar Type
T-Shade
R-Shade
T-Hanger
R-Hanger
Ave. Area
1.125.00
1,846.75
1.125.00
1,846.75
Monthly Fee
$300.00
$550.00
$400.00
$660.00
These fees would be applied to Phase I construction as well as Phase II.
10
However, given the scenario in which FDOT provides half of the capital expense of
construction of the hangar buildings and FAA provides 90% of the cost of the common use
taxiways leading to the hangars, these rental fees could realistically be closer to the following:
~
~
I
I
Hangar Type
T-Shade
R-Shade
T-Hanger
R-Hanger
Ave. Area
1,125.00
1,846.75
1,125.00
1,846.75
.
Monthly Fee
$170.00
$320.00
$250.00
$380.00
Again these fees would be applied to both Phase I construction as well as Phase II constru~tion.
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
11
w ~ . '-'" Ul "'. II"'\n..U~Wi ~UUU
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
TERMINAL
PUBLICLY EXPOSED SPACE
NON-PUBLIC SPACE
COVERED AREAS & STORAGE
LANDING FEE
LAND RENTAL RATES
AIRLINE
GENERAL AVIATION
COUNTY LEASED PROPERTY
(PER 1992 R&C .85)
FUEL FLOW FEE
UTILITIES
TRASH
MARATHON AIRPORT
TERMINAL
PUBLICLY EXPOSED SPACE
NON-PUBLIC SPACE
COVERED AREAS & STORAGE
LANDING FEE
LAND RENTAL RATES
AIRLINE
GENERAL AVIATION
COUNTY LEASED PROPERTY
(PER 1992 R&C .85)
FUEL FLOW FEE
UTILITIES
FBO - ADDITIONAL PROPERTY
22.25 ISO. FT./YEAR
689.91 PER MONTH MINIMUM
15.88 ISO. FT./YEAR
12.71 ISO. FT./YEAR
.75/1000 LBS. GROSS LANDING WEIGHT _
9.38 MINIMUM FOR 12,500 LBS OR LESS
0.49 ISO. FT./YEAR
0.41 ISQ. FT./YEAR
0.94 ISO. FT./YEAR
0.06 IGALLON DELIVERED
352.95 PER MONTH
163.91 PER MONTH
24.92 ISO. FT ./YEAR
689.91 /MONTH MINIMUM
16.82 ISO. FT./YEAR
12.16 ISO. FT./YEAR
.75/1000 LBS. GROSS LANDING WEIGHT _
9.38 MINIMUM FOR 12,500 LBS OR LESS
0.40 ISO. FT./YEAR
I I
0.30 ISQ. FT./YEAR
0.94 ISQ. FT./YEAR
0.04 IGALLON DELIVERED
289.83 PER MONTH
Rent for unimproved property - 10.8 cents per sq. foot, per year. Lower rate is offset by fuel flow charge. CPt yearly.
Buildings/improvements - tenant will pay County match, 5% - 50%. Upon completion all improvements become County property.
IBEV 11/17/99
. '
, '
"
...
LEASE AGREEMEt:il
Marathon, Fl33050. hereafter Lessee or Tenant.
,
THIS AGREEMENT Is made by and between Manroe County. a paUflcal ,ubdlvlslan of the
Stale of Florida. who.e address I. 500 Whllehead Slmet. Key We.t. FlOrida 33040. hereafter
Lessor. 'and Hangers On. Inc.. a Florida corporalion. who,e address Is 7900 GUlfstream BlVd..
I,) The partie. mutually agree to cancel and rescind their Lea'e Agreemenl entered Into
W, TN E S S E.r H:
on Seplember 21. 1995, with neither party owIng any further duty or obUgatlcn to the alher
under the terms of that 1995 Agreement.
II.) I. When the lIems described In paragraph III ere completed, then the Lessor lea,es
to Ihe Lessee a Peircel of land, and the Improvements on the land, af the Marathon AIrport,
Marathon, Monroe County, Florida, Ihe parcel mea'uring ;;;980 square feel. hereafter Ihe
leased premise. or Ihe premIse., os shown on Exhlbll A (property map). ExhibIt A Is attached 10
thls Agreement end made Q part of It,
2. ' The tenn of fhls lease Is twenty (20) Years. beglnnJng on the day otter the dale the
capitol Improvements deScribed In paragraph III are completed.
3. . The shade hanga/3 localed On the leased PfemU,;s deSCribed In Exhibit A w"'
beeo!"e the property at the lessor Immediately upon the pcrfles' execvtlon of thIs Agreement,
4, The Lessor grants to the lessee a license at keep lis airplanes at the premise,'
hanger faaUty in existence On the effective date at this Agreement WhU.. 'he capllal
Improvement conslrvcflon process /s ongplng. The lesser may raqulre the lessee to move fls
airplanes when the airplanes' Presence would Interfere with Conslrucflon. The license begIns
on the effectIve date of thIs Agreement and ends when the capital Improvements requlmd by
parallraph 11/ ere Completed and the lecte begin., The re'trictions on th.. Lessee's use of the
the Ircense rent In th s SUbpC1ragraph.
1fD) ~ @ lIB , ~ Jiil
wr .n.},rm I~,
hanger faclUfles set forth In paragraph IV aka apply to the Lessee's USe of Ihe facHme. under
. .
,
I, :
L..... _
i~ ^ ~' "~~~ . ",,1I!-'t.lm\,~. ."MlMr_""........,__ . '..
~~: ~JI, . ~ ,. ~ .'. .~.~ . .~, . ~
I
I
i
!
I
t:----
~~UUNfY HTTORNEY*
,
TEL:305-292-3516
Jun 03,97' 14=17 No.OOS P.O:
II/.J The Lessor must make the fol/owlng capItal Improvements to the leasehold:
~ 1.' Complete the electrical work descrIbed In Monroe County buUding permit No.96e
..
2-8 t 6:
2.} Enclose the hangars In order to prOvide four Independent hangar boys with four
electric zero tolerance high fold doors on 'he ,outh .Ide and four access doors on the norlh
side with the option for access doors In the high fold doors at the Lessee" eXpanse. In
.
encloslnc the hangers. the hencer feclllfy floor space must remain as deflned by the outsIde of
the four vertIcal support posts In existence on the effective date of thIs Acreement.
3.} Construct the pavement necessary for Ingress and egress to the honcar fccmfy
and fhe pavement necessary to connect fhe hangar facmty to fhe maIn taxI-way of the
~
Airport:
'.. .
4.) lnstoll one water lIna and Onamafar to the structure and Indall four hos9 bIbs
(one per hangar bay].
. .
IV.) The lessee is responsible for normal and routine maintenance of the hangar facitifies.
not to Include hangar facmly repalrs or repaIrs to fhe surroundIng area. If dUring the term of
this lease the hangar faclllly Is demaced or destroyed. then the lessor must promptly, and at
no cost to the lessee. repaIr or reconstruct fhe hangar facility. The repair or reconstruction
.+
must be made wrth the same cruel/ty materIals and In the some- dimensIons os the damaged or
destroyed hangar feclIlty,
I I
V., The Lessee hereby covenants and agrees' to pay the Lessor rent In the amount of 30~
per square foot per year for the leased erea for.Q total annual rent of $1.494.00. The rent Is
. , , ;
. payable on a monthly basis. In advance. In the amount of $124.50. The Lessee may elect to
-
pay fhe ennual amount, In advance. as a lump sum. The lessee Is also responsIble for all sales
taxes. The rent Oareed fa In fhls par?QrOph will be ad/vsted annvally In accordance with the
~ .~ ..
percerifoge Change In the Con$Vmer PrIce Index ICPIJ 'or wage eamers and Jlerical workers InK-:;.
i7/;Y~ ~~
. """4....1 VI 1 I I
H I I Ut<Nt. Yl!<
TEL:305-292-3516
Jun 03.97
14:20 No.OOS P.04
-
Ihe Mlaml/ft. lavderdale, Florida area, and will be based on the annual C1Verage CPl.
. .
computaflon trom January 1 to December 31 of the prior year, The perfles agree that the only
..
additional cost not Included abOVe Is a potential Increase In the amount of Insurance
coverage required by the lessee, Should the lessor requite all tenants at Ihe airport. tor gOod
couse, to Increase the amount at Jnsuronce required by the County. .uch an additional
Insuranc.. requIrement w"' be passed an to the lessee, Hangars On, Ino. My .uch Increase wRl
be In the same pro rata proportIon as fa the olher tenants at the Morathon AIrport at that time,
VI.} The lessor hereby covenonts end agrees with the lessee as fOlloWs:
'.} The Lessee has the right 10 OCOUpy fhe 'eesed premlses.
2.1 The Lessee has reasonable Ingress, egress and aCCess to fhe leased p'dm/ses.
3.) The Lessee may only .vblease the premIses tor longer than six months. or assIgn Its
leasehOld, with the approval of the lessor's Board of County CommIsslone,.. whose approval
may not be unreasonably withheld, The Lessee may ,ublease the hangar fac",'ies for six
months 0/' less without lessor's Board of County Commlsslone13' opprovaL but .ubJect to
~
notifying the lessor's Marothon Alrporl Manager as provided In ,vbparogrcph VIliS),
4.1 The Lessee, on keepIng the COvenants and Obligations contaIned In this
Agreement. has the qvlet and peaceful enjoyment of the leased premIses dUring Ihe tenn of
this lease Wlfhouf any IntellUPtlons by the lessor or by any person('1 claiming through or under
. .
the lessor.
I I
vu.' The lessee hereby covenants wlfh the Lessor-
I.) To pay th" lessor the rent at lhe lIme, and In the manner provIded for by thl,
leose.
2.) No mortgage. lien. or encumbrance of any kind may be placed on the leased
premIses, lnc/vdfng the hangar foCllfffes.
Hip
....
.LUUNfY HTTORNEY*
TEL:305-292-3516
Jun 03.97
14:20 No.OOS P.05
-
3.) No mod/flcoflon(s) to the hangar foclRlles may be made until the mOdiflcatlon(s} .
ore approved by the Lessor's Merathon Airport Manager.
,
4.J The hangar foclIlties may only be Used for the following:
a,) The housing of airplanes not Used In commercIal 'ervlce or ofhelWlse USed
In competition with ony service offered for a fee by the Merathon AIrport
Fao, other than the rental of hangar spece;
b.) The prcvlding of care, repair and molntenance of only those airplanes
ohoused at the hanger focfUties. No other USe af ,he hangar facftifles may be
undertaken by the Lessee wUhout fhe approval of t he Lessor's Soerd of
County Commissioners:
c,' The temporary perkIng of automoblles.
5,) The lessee Will provide the lessor's Marathon Airport Manager with a lis! Of the
hangar facIlity OCCupants, and theIr aircraft, that am approved by 'he lessee.. An Updafed /1st
must be provIded the Airport MenogerWith/n five (5) days trom when an occupant or aircraft Is
~
chenged. .
6.) No improper or unlawful or offensive use may be mad.. of 'he leas"d premises,
7.) less.... must permit th.. lessor or Its Cgents to Insp"ct the leased premise, at all
reasonable times for the purpose of viewing the condition of the premises.
8.) The l..ssee must obtaIn and pay tor water and eleetrlcol services '0 the premises
fn Its own roome.
9., Th.. Lesse.. Covenants and agr..es to Indemnify and hald hannless the Lessor from
I I
any and all c10lms for bOdily inlury (Including death). peDonal Injury. and property damage
Pncludlng property owned by Monroe Counfy) end,ony Ilther losses. damages and expenses
(inClUding atfomey's fees) whIch arise out of, In connection With, or by reason of ,ervlces
provIded by the L.....ee or any of Its controctClS, occasioned by the negligence. ..nors or other
IYrongrut act or Omission at fhe Lessee or Its confractor(s), their ..mployees or agenfs. This
obllgcflon of Ind..mn/flcatlon Is not vitiated by th.. InslJtance obligations contained In
II iF"
paragraph 10 and ExhibIt B.
~LUUNrY HTTORNEY*
TEl:30S-292-3S16
Jun 03.97
14:21 No.OOS P.OE
-
10,) Regerdless of Ihe effective date of thl, Agreement. Ihe lessee may not occUpy .
Ihe premises. under either the ilcense or the lease, until It has obtaIned 'he Insurance r"qUIr"d
,
by Exhibit B and produced adequate Proof of such Insurance to fhe County'. Director of Risk
Management. ExhIbit B /s attached '0 thl, lease agreem..nt and mad.. pcrj of It,
II.J .Af 'he expIration at the .Ienn .of the lease. the lessee wlI/ qu1e'1y and peaceablY
deliver up possesslon of the leased premIses to fhe Lessor,
VIII.J t.J This lease may be canceled at the dlscrelton of the lessor If:
o.J leS$~e falls fa trmely pay fhe renf:
b,) lessee falls to obtain the Insurance required under this Agreement w1fhln
thirty (301 days of the effective date af this. Agreement or ailows lhe
required Insuronce COveraga to lapse or fall below the minImum required;
or
~
. ~_.. c,) lessea otherwise breaches the tenn, of this lea,e agreement.
. .
2.} The Lessor may also cancel thIs lease If the Joa,ed premise, are required to
accommodate futuro development 01 the Marcthon AIrport or for any other reo'on
delermlned by 'he FAA or the lessor. lessor, If It detennlnes to cancel the leas.. under this
paragraph. must provide the lessee with thirty (30) days Written naltce before 'he ccrneetralton
becomes effective. lessee mu,t then abandon and quIetly and peaceably deliver up 'he
..
POSSession of the le",ed premises. If Lessor cancels the lease agi.,;,mant und..r this paragraph.
. I I .
Lessor wlI/ not be liable to Lessee for .ony damages - direct or cons9Cfuentlal-lUf(ere~ by the
Lessee as the result of the cancellctlon. HOWever. If the lessor 9lC<m:lse"ts right to cancel the
lease under thIs subparagraph. the Lessor must provide !he Lesse.. WIth ,ubsflfute hangar
faclllltes that ere slmller to the focilities fvmlshed under this 'BOSe,
the grounds of race, color, or noflonol origin ,hall be excluded from PartIcIpation In. denIed
/1 . ,11
IX.} The ten~t for hlmseft. his penonal repre'entaltves. 'uccessO/J In Interest. and assIgns.
as Part af the conslderalton hereot, does hereby COVenant and agree fha~ (J) 1\0 POllan on
, ..
, .... U V I' I I M I I U I< N t:. y *
TEL =305-292-3516
Jun 03,97
14:21 No.OOS P.O
the benefits of. or be otherwIse subjected to dlscrimlnatlon In the use of said facfllffes: (2J that
"
In the construction of any Improvements on. over or under such land a'nd the furnIshing of
I
servIces thereon. no pallon on the grounds of race, color or national origIn shall be excluded .
from parllclpc1lon In. denied the benefJts of. or be otherwlse sub]ected to dlscrimrnotlon;
(3J that the tenant shall use the premises. In compliance wIth all other requirements Imposed by
or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulatrons. Department of Trensportation. Subtlfle A.
.
Office of fhe Secretary, Part 21, Nondlscrlmlnatlon In Federally-cssIsted programs of the
Department of Transportaflon - Effectuation of Tlfle VI of fhe Clvll Rights Act of 1964. and as said
RegUlations may be 'amended.
-
That In fhe event of breach of any of the above non.dlscriminaflon covenants, Airport
. .. r
Owner shall hove the right to terminate ttie lease and to re~enter ~nd as If sald lease had never
been mede or Issued. The provisIon shall nof be effective untll the procedures of Title 49, Code
of Federer Reguletions,.Parl .21. are ~ollowe~ end completed IncludIng exerclse or expiration of
. appeal rights.
X.) It sholl be a condItion at this leese, that the lessor reserves unto Itself. its successors
and assigns, for the use and benefit of the public, a right o( flight for the passage of aIrcraft in
the airspace above the surface of the real property hereinafter described. together wifh the
right to COuse In saId airspace $uch noIse as may be Inherenf In the operation of aircraft. now
,
I I
known or hereafter used. for navigation of or flight In the saId. airspace. ana for use of sold
aIrspace for landing on. taking off from or operating on the aIrport.
. ,
That fhe tenant expressly agrees for Itself, lfs soccessors and assIgns. to restrict the height of
sfrvcfures, objects of natural growth a':1d other obstru~tlons on the herelnetter described raal
property to such a helght so as to comply wlth Federel AvIation Regulations, Part 77.
That th& lessee expressly agrt~es for Itse'f, Ifs successors and assIgns, to prevent any use of
,
the hereinafter described real property which should Interfere with or adversely affect th
....
operation or maintenance of the airport. or otherwise comtlfute an aIrport hazard.
oul)
. '-L..' ,",V";~-L';;>L-~;:)l.t:>
Jun 03,97
14:21 No.OOS P.O:
XI.) This lease and all prov','ons hereof ere 'UbJect and ,ubordlncfe 10 the lenns and
..
,
conditions of the Instruments and documents under which the AIrport Owner acquIred the
subject property from the United States of America. and shall be gIven only ,uch effect a.1Y/lI
not conflict or be InconsIstent wfth the 'enns and cond/flons contaIned In the leas.. of .ald-
lands from the Airport Owner. and any exIsting or 'Ubsequent amendments thereto and are
subject to any ordinances. rules or. regUlations whIch have been. or may hereafter be
adopted by fhe Airport Owner perlalnfng to fhe Marathon Afrport,
XII,' Notwlthsfandlng anythIng herein contained that may be. or appeer to be. to Ihe ~
contrary. If Is expressly understood and agreed that the rights granted under this agreemenl
are nonexclusIve and the Lessor herein reserves the right to grant 'fmllcr privileges to another
lessee or other lessees on other parts of the Afrport.
XIfI,)Thls lease agreement k between the Lessor and 'he lessee only, NothIng In this lease
may create a confractuol relatlonshfp wlfh, or any rights fn fevor of, any thfrd party.
XIV.) This lease agreement ha, been care tully reviewed by both the Lessee and the
lessor. Therefore, this lease Is nof to be constrved again" any party on the basis of authorship,
. I I
XV.) This lease agreement repre.en!t the PartIes' final and mutual unde13tandlng. If
replaces any eOrller agreements or undersfeindlngs. whether Written or oral. !his lease cannot
be modlffed or replaced except by another signed lease or leasQ amendment.
~N~
(Hangarl On, Inc. . Marathon ,lJrport L
"
... W _......,'- I T
It.L:~U::>-292-3516
Jun 03.97
14:~3 No.OOS p.Qo
-
XVI,) NothIng In Ih/s lease should be read os mOdllylng the applicable daMe of .
limItatIons. The waiver of the breach at any obtrgaflon at thIs lease doe, not waive another
,
breech of thot or Ony other obllgot/on.
XVII,} This lease takes effect on t/:le dote of the signature of the last party to sign.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused thIs agreemenf to be execufed In
.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY.. FtOR1DA
-:
. .
Date: 0 (0- \ 8- ~..,
(CORPORATE SEAL}
A lTEST:
B~~~
? 1 ~cretery
Date: G- 3-CP7
aa/con2lhanaoo02
H~'NC'
By, ~;( ~,,/
PresIdent ./.
, . ,/)
A1~e' o6rr I L~
/~~c:& . l ~
. n J kbberf- Eo ~;=:: q
7 ){.--"\ f( ~ ~ AP'<<OVlO A$ TO f M
~ A .
c-
-
-------
~ () I
1 r ,<: .
~ (--'>
f ~ ~~.:.,
1//1: - ~
'f . O<l
.t:... I~'~ I
J. '~~.. I
.u, I, l::J .
III ~.
III
{;,I..I
t. 1
II
,
'lllfl i~j
,J I I' I' , .( i I
. r r ~
tllll~/B;
Ii ~'1f'
l'lllll ::
I .
lflllj
f
I'
. II
i
.
..
J I
i
J I
I I i
I fila. "I
J I", II
: ll'ljl j U
. 4 .1 .
J · f
I 11
C
I~~;
It [:
,
'P'
, t I
'(I
"II
Jl1
iNff .
.. ;1
,
III
.. .
r' Ol J.
i. . : t
..:. '.
fiti i
.
'1
U .. .
3 s
. . .. . ,
f . 1 _
.. I ·
. . ...
.
..
. i
. ..
. I
..
.. l
.
:
.~
..
.
.
4
II
..
"
.
It
..
.
.
J
, f
,
i
~....
.. IJt i~
:;;illi
!;;,Jj1i'J
J J r f
j it I
. : if
" " lJ'
..... .
~~;..,., ..
, ~~-;~.~
~.~\:.....
I
I;
:~
I
I
..
~.
~
-
:n
-0
0
:I1
-i
~
~
~
"
.. ~
- Z
.t
t.
oo..
..
.
.
t.
0..
o.
'~
'II
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
~"~""'-;
'''--.......
........... .
--~.... n I I UKNt. y*
,
.
TEL:305-292-3516
EXHIBIT "B"
I I
,
,
.f
Jun 03,97
.
"
WLO
".
14:2S No.OOS P,12
-
.
..
~
"
~LUUNtY ATTORNEY* __
TEL: 30S-292-~~.~6
Jun 03,97
14:2S No.OOS P,l:
-
~
. GENERAL LIAUILI1i'
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONTRACT _
n 1~'l'VEEN
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
, ~il2Z. 191.1
'I( 1\i'Clne
'f'"
I
,
.
..
-
..
-
Prior 10 Il.e commenCCment of w(\rk governed by 11,1. conll'llel, tile C1!nll'llClor s111l11 ohlllla
Oelteral UnbiliIY"nsur""cc. COVCOlse '''nll be mainlaiucc/ Ill/'()ughQUllhe lifo oflhe conlrac{ and
include, as a minimum:
· Premises Operations
· Products.and Cornplc((;d Opera lions
· Dfankct Contrac(unl Liabili(y
· PcrSona1lnjury Uability
· Expanded Definilion of Properly Damage
., .
~
'1'110 minimum limits acceptable sllal1 be:
$300,000 Combincc/ Single Umil (CSt)
Ifsplit limits arc provided,tI.e minimum limits aCCeptable s11a11 be:
$100,000 pcr Person
$300,000 per OCcurrencc
S' 50,QOO Propcr1y DamaSc
An OCCuITCllCO Ponlt policy is prcfcrn:d. If coverage Is proVidcc/ on a Claims Made policy, ils
Provisions sl,ould include COverage fur claims tiled on Or Iller tllG c/l'cctlvc dalo of Ihls CCltlract,. ,
In addition, Il.e PeriOd for wldel. claims may be reported s/lould extend for a minimum oflwelve.
(/2) monlhs follOwlnglhe aCCcptllllCQ ofworlc by the COullly.
..
ihe Monroe COUnty 300rd of County Commissionerw shall be named lIS Additlona! 1n."Orcd on an
pOliclC$ isSUed 10 satisfy the above rcqulll".menls.. .
. .. ,
. .
,
,
,
"
MnIlIllCtwfl"C'lrNt\lcfiM
*~"^-A ".
[,10
PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME STATEMENT
"A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list
following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on a
contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a
bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public
building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to
public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,
subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may
not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount
provided in Section 287.017, for CA TEGOR Y TWO for a period of 36
months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list."
. .
I I
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
I,
of the city
of
according to law on my oath, and under
penalty of perjury, depose and say that;
1) I am
Proposal for the project described'as follows:
, the bidder making the
2) The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently without collusion,
consultation, communication or agreement for the purpose of restricting competition, as
to any matter ~elating to such prices with any other bidder or with any competitor;
3) Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid
have not been knowingly disclosed by the bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by
the bidder prior to bid opening, directly or indirectly, to any other bidder or to any
competitor; and
4) No attempt has been made or will be made by the bidder to induce any other
person, partnership or corporation to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of
restricting competition;
5) The statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct, and made with
full knowledge that Monroe County relies upon the truth of the statements contained in
this affidavit in awarding contracts for said project.
STATE OF
(Signature of Bidder)
COUNTY OF
DATE
PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
I I
who, after first being sworn by me, (name of
individual signing) affixed his/her signature in the space provided above on this
day of
,19
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
OMS - MCP FORM #1
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM
The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that
(Name of Busines.s).
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture. distribution, dispensing,
possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that
will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance
programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under bid a
copy of the statement specified in subsection (1).
4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working on
the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the
statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty omolo contendere to, any
violation of Chapter 893 (Florida Statutes) or of any controlled substance law of the United States or any
state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction.
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community, or any employee who is so
convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of this
section.
As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above
requirements.
. I
Bidder's Signature
Date
SWORN STATEMENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 10-1990
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Enncs CLAUSE
warrants that helit has not employed, retained
or otherwise had act on his/its behalf any former County officer or employee in violation of
Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1 0-19~0 or any County officer or employee in violation of
Section 3 of Ordinance No. 10-1990. For breach or violation of this provision the County
may, in its discretion, terminate this contract without liability and may also, in its discretion,
,
deduct from the contract or purchase price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of any fee,
commission, percentage, gift, or consideration paid to the former County officer or employee.
(signature)
Date:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
PERSONALL Y APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
who, after first being sworn by me, affixed hislher
signature (name of individual sigriing) in the space provided above on this
day of
, 19 .
---rt
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
OMB - MCP FORM #4