Loading...
Item R5BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date:May 15, 2013 Division: County Attorney Bulk Item: Yes X No _ Department: Susan Grimsley Staff Contact Person/Phone #: 292.3470 AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of amendment to Board of County Commissioners Administrative Procedures Sec. 1.03(i) allowing ex-parte communication pursuant to Ordinances No. 035-2010 and No. 012-2013. ITEM BACKGROUND: F.S. Sec. 286.0115 states that if local public officials follow the procedures as set forth in the statute, the presumption of prejudice arising from any ex-parte communications with public officials is removed in any challenge to the decision reached. The Board adopted Ordinance No. 035-2010 and Ordinance No.012-2013 enacting the procedures set out in the statute. Ordinance No. 012-2013 directed that the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Administrative Procedures be amended to reflect the procedure. rREvtOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: November 17, 2010 - BOCC passed Ordinance No. 035-2010. March 20, 2013 - BOCC passed Ordinance No. 012-2013. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: srAtT' RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval TOTAL COST: NA INDIRECT COST: $0 BUDGETED: Yes No DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: COST TO COUNTY: SOURCE OF FUNDS: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes _ No X AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty A� DOCUMENTATION: Included DISPOSITION: Revised 7/09 OMB/Purchasing Risk Management Not Required AGENDA ITEM # C UNTY So�MONROE KEY WESTLORIDA 33040 (305)294-4641 Robert B. Shillinger, County Attorney** Pedro J. Mercado, Assistant County Attorney ** Susan M. Grimsley, Assistant County Attorney** Natileene W. Cassel, Assistant County Attorney** Cynthia L. Hall, Assistant County Attorney ** Christine Limbert-Barrows, Assistant County Attorney ** Derek V. Howard, Assistant County Attorney Lisa Granger, Assistant County Attorney Steven T. Williams, Assistant County Attorney ** Board Certified in City, County & L.ocal Govt. Law MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and County Commissioners BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mayor George Neugent, District 2 Mayor Pro Tern, Heather Carruthers, District 3 Danny L. Kolhage, District 1 David Rice, District 4 Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5 Office of the County Attorney 1111 12`h Street, Suite 408 Key West, FL 33040 (305) 292-3470 — Phone (305) 292-3516 — Fax Through: Robert B. Shillinger, County Attorney -�' From: Susan Grimsley, Assistant County Attorney Date: April 29, 2013 Re: Amendment to BOCC Administrative Procedures Concerning Ex Parte Communications See.1.03(i) BOCC Meeting May 15, 2013 At the March 20, 2013, meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the Board passed Ordinance No. 012- 2013 confirming adoption of procedures in Ordinance No. 035-2010 concerning the necessity for disclosure of ex parte communications in non -land use quasi-judicial matters. Ordinance No. 035-2010 had already adopted procedures for land use matters which were quasi-judicial anddo not require disclosure. Currently, the BOCC Administrative Procedures, Sec. 1.03(i), state that there shall not be any communication with any party having an interest in a quasi-judicial item. Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115 states that the presumption of prejudice arising from any ex-parte communications with public officials is removed in any challenge to the decision reached if the procedure in F.S. Sec. 286.0115 is followed. The adopted procedures are not reflected in the Board's Administrative Procedures. Ordinance No. 012-2013 directs the County Attorney's staff to amend the procedures and present them for board approval. The new procedures provide for disclosure of ex-parte communications, including written materials , site visits or expert opinions, prior to the matter being considered for non -land use matters (of which right of way appeals are included) and no requirement for disclosure in land use matters (land use district {zoning} amendments, beneficial use determinations, administrative relief, flood zone appeals and flood variances, appeals from ROGO rankings.) These decisions must be based on substantial competent evidence. This ordinance does not directly affect takings liability or Bert Harris Act claims. RESOLUTION NO. -2013 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING SECTION 1.03(i) OF THE BOARD'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO. 012-2013 CONCERNING EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WHEREAS, on November 17, 2010, the Board passed Ordinance No.035-2010 which established Monroe County Code Sec. 2-202 concerning quasi-judicial proceedings, and ex parte communications, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners passed Ordinance No.012-2013 on March 20, 2013, which made clear the adoption of the portion of the Ordinance No. 035-2010 dealing with and eliminating the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with local public officials; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 035-2013 directed that the Board of County Commissioners Administrative Procedures be amended to reflect the changes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners: Section 1.03(i) of the Administrative Procedures of the Board of County Commissioners is amended as follows: agenda item eutside the eenfines of the County Genunissien meeting with any pafty „g an intemst inai i-- ""- doubt as to whether- an agenda item is quasi f i) Commissioners may communicate with any person concerning land use matters even though they are quasi-judicial. Disclosure of such communication is not required All decisions of the Board must be supported by substantial, competent evidence irrespective of such communication Examples of land use matters before the Board are zoning map amendments administrative relief, beneficial use determinations and Weals from ROGO rankings Flood plain management appeals and variances also come under this category. Quasi-judicial matters which are not land use matters may be discussed with any person. However, the identity of the person and the subject of the communication must be disclosed and made a part of the record before final action Written communication from a party must be made a part of the record before final action Commissioners may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding the matter. These activities must be disclosed and made a part of the record before final action. All disclosures must be made at the beginningof the meeting, or before an agenda item is called so that persons having a contrary opinion still have opportunity to comment. In the event such disclosure is made during the item discussion, persons who desire to speak to refute or respond may still comment Examples of Quasi-judicial matters which are not land use matters which may become before the Board are appeals of right -of -way decisions There are very few quasi — judicial decisions which are not land use matters considered by the Board If a Commissioner is in doubt as to the nature of the matter, the commissioner should contact the County Attorney or an assistant county attorney. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of May, 2013. Mayor George Neugent Mayor pro tem Heather Carruthers Commissioner Danny L. Kolhage Commissioner David Rice Commissioner Sylvia Murphy BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAN Mayor George Neugent (SEAL) ATTEST: AMY HEAVILIN, CLERK Deputy Clerk MONROE-OUNTYATTORNEY PPR V D AS TO FORM: S $ N M, GRIM6kEY ASSIST NT COUNTY ATTORNEY _ i- - - 2 q - a.043 ADDITIONAL BACK-UP: BOCC Administrative Procedures (Rev. August 2011) Ordinance No. 012-2013 Ordinance No. 035-2013 Monroe County Board of County Commissioners ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES REVISED AUGUST 2011 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES SECTION I Section 1.01 - Introductory Items. a) Except as may be provided by these Rules and By -Laws, questions of order, the methods of organization and the conduct of business of the Commission shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised, 1990 Edition, which is hereby adopted by the Commission. b) The Mayor: In Chapter 65-1931, Laws of Florida, the Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners was designated the Mayor and the Vice Chairperson the Mayor Pro-Tem. Therefore, in these administrative procedures, the terms Mayor and Chairperson, and Mayor Pro- Tem and Vice Chairperson, refer to identical officers and are used interchangeably. Section 1.02 - Meeting. a) Regular Meetings: The County Commission shall hold regular meetings, usually on a Wednesday and the immediately following Thursday of each month, in a week at the time(s) determined by motion of the County Commission. Other times and dates may also be established by a motion of the County Commission. No regular meeting may be scheduled when the day fixed for a regular meeting falls on a designated holiday. The locations for regularly scheduled meetings of the County Commission shall be established by motion of the County Commission but the monthly location for the regularly scheduled meetings must rotate among the Lower, Middle and Upper keys. All meeting sites must be in compliance with the American Disabilities Act and any other applicable civil rights statutes. In an extenuating situation (e.g., a hurricane or other disaster), and with the notice reasonably provided in light of the situation, the Mayor or County Administrator may designate another location and time for a regularly scheduled meeting of the County Commission. The County Commission shall not schedule any particular time of the year as a vacation period but shall individually stagger their vacation times so that the County Commission may continue to function throughout the year. b) Special Meetings: A special meeting of the County Commission may be called by the Mayor, or in his/her absence the Mayor Pro Tem whenever, in his/her opinion, the public's business requires it. A special meeting may also be called by three members of the County Commission. 2 All requests for a special meeting must state the purpose of the meeting and a proposed time and location. When a special meeting is called by the Mayor, then a written request for the meeting must be delivered to the Clerk. When a County Commissioner (other than the Mayor) wishes to call a special meeting, he or she must send the written request to the Clerk and, at the same time, send the request to all other members of the County Commission, and the County Administrator. If, within two business days, two other County Commissioners send to the Clerk written approval of the requested special meeting, then the special meeting will be considered called. The County Commissioners who send the Clerk written approval of the requested special meeting must also, at the same time, send copies to the County Administrator. If the Clerk determines that the special meeting was properly called, then the Clerk must promptly provide verbal or written notice, unless specifically waived, to the County Commission members, the County Administrator and the County Attorney, stating the date, hour and place of the meeting and the purpose of the meeting. The Clerk must also send written notice of the special meeting to the local media outlets. Only the business stated in the notice of the special meeting may be considered at the meeting unless the Mayor or the County Administrator determines that the public's best interest would be served if additional items were considered and an amended written agenda is delivered by the County Administrator to all County Commissioners, the County Attorney, and the local media outlets a minimum of one business day in advance of the special meeting date. Alternatively, a majority of the County Commissioners present at the special meeting may agree to add additional items to the special meeting agenda. When the Clerk has received a request for a special meeting that complies with this subsection 1.02(b), he or she must make sure that there are at least four hours between the call for the meeting and the date and hour of the meeting unless an extenuating circumstance (e.g., an impending hurricane) prevents that. If, after reasonable diligence, it was impractical to give notice to each County Commissioner then that failure will not affect the legality of the special meeting if a quorum is present. The minutes of each special meeting must show the manner and method by which notice of the special meeting was given to each member of the County Commissioners or the waiver of the notice. c) The notice requirements set forth in this Section 1.02 are in addition to, and not the replacement for, notice requirements mandated by general law. d) All County Commission meetings are open to the public unless a specific exemption is provided by general law. 3 e) The Clerk must record, and is the custodian of, all County Commission minutes. f) FOR WORKSHOP PURPOSES: MODIFICATION OF TELECONFERENCEING OF PUBLIC MEETINGS (i) Public Participation - Workshop Meetings of the County Commission may be conducted using an interactive video and telephone system to allow the commissioners and County staff/consultants to communicate with commissioners and staff/consultants at the workshop; and to allow the public to participate in meetings as observers, provided the following procedures are in effect: A. The public notice for the workshop meeting sets forth the locations at which teleconferencing participation shall be conducted, and shall include a statement to the following effect: "The meeting will be in workshop format only which does not allow for members of the public to speak. The BOCC workshop meeting will be televised at the locations specified in this notice, but prospective attendees are hereby notified that the County can not guarantee that the teleconferencing equipment will function properly although every reasonable effort will be made to enable the teleconferencing. B. There shall be a County technician present at each teleconferencing site throughout the meeting. C. The attendees at the teleconferencing site shall be subject to the same rules of decorum and participation as any person attending the meeting, and may be removed by a Sheriff's Deputy upon direction by the presiding officer; and D. The teleconferencing of a meeting shall allow the commissioners and audience present at the meeting site to hear and observe the speakers at the teleconferencing site. Participation by an Absent Commissioner - A Commissioner may; participate by teleconference at a duly noticed teleconferencing site at a workshop meeting of the County Commission, provided the following conditions are met: 4 A. All of the requirements of a teleconferenced meeting as noted in sub -section (i) above are met; B. The absent Commissioner is able, via the teleconference technology, to see the other members of the board at the meeting and the board and audience at the meeting site can see the Commissioner; Section 1.03 - Agenda: a) Regular Meeting Agenda: Matters for action - proposals and discussion items - may be placed on the regular meeting agenda only by a Commissioner, the County Attorney, County Clerk and County Administrator. 1. An agenda will be prepared by the County Administrator's office for every regular meeting or special meeting of the Commission. The Commission shall not take action on any matter, proposal, or report of item of business which is not listed in the revised agenda which is circulated 96 hours in advance of the meeting as provided in subsection 3 below, unless there is a unanimous vote of the members present, agreeing to the addition of other items to the agenda for consideration and action. 2. All regular meeting agenda items must be delivered to the County Administrator's office no later than 5 PM on the 15th day prior to the scheduled meeting date. The agenda must be prepared and distributed so as to be received by the County Commissioners no later than 9 AM seven days prior to the scheduled meeting. 3. A revised agenda shall be prepared to provide back-up which need to be replaced or supplemented for original agenda items, and additional items which were being developed but could not be completed before the original agenda deadline and for which delay until the following regular meeting may jeopardize a program project or funding. Items that are placed on the revised agenda to be prepared by the County Administrator's office shall have all back-up materials submitted to the Administrator's office the Wednesday noon prior to the scheduled meeting. The revised agenda shall then be distributed to the County Commissioners 96 weekdays hours prior to the scheduled meeting. No items on the Revised Agenda prepared by the County Administrator's office shall be considered by the County Commission without the appropriate back-up materials unless there is to be no action taken and/or the topic is for discussion or information only. 5 4. Items added to the agenda by vote of the County Commissioners shall (1) contain back-up documentation showing that review by County Administrator, appropriate staff, and County Attorney has occurred and includes the respective recommendations for action, or (2) the Commissioner, the Administrator, the County Clerk, or the County Attorney requesting placement of the item on the agenda represents that he/she has a significant reason for placement on the agenda and the following criteria are met: (i) a showing that time is of the essence and that delay to alter BOCC agenda will have a high probability of a negative impact on the County, and (ii) appropriate staff is present to make comment on the item, notwithstanding the impromptu nature of their input. 5. All items which require approval by the County Attorney for legal sufficiency and form shall be signed by the County Attorney or Assistant County Attorney before placement on the agenda. Unless mandated otherwise by a general law, all scheduled times on the County Commission agenda are approximate even if denominated as time certain.'The Mayor should however, conduct the meetings in such a manner that the agenda schedule is followed as closely as circumstances allow. Invocation will be a moment of silent contemplation. b) Sounding Board: A separate section of the regular meeting agenda will be reserved for Sounding Board. Individuals who wish to utilize Sounding Board must contact the County Administrator's Office in writing in order to be scheduled on the agenda, must specify the subject matter of the presentation, and must submit the request prior to the deadline for the revised agenda of the meeting for which the matter is to be scheduled. The County Administrator may decline to place any item on Sounding Board that he reasonably considers improper for placement before the Board of County Commissioners. Sounding Board shall be scheduled for a time approximate for public convenience. The purpose of the Sounding Board is to allow individuals to address the County Commission on a matter pertaining to County government, excluding matters in litigation and complaints against specific personnel. The person who requested to be on Sounding Board shall be the initial speaker and, whether representing him or herself, or any organization, may address the County commission for a period up to ten minutes. Subsequent speakers may speak for three minutes. No action, which shall include direction to staff, may be taken by the County Commission on an item on the Sounding Board agenda c) Presentations May not be promotional for products and services and will be limited to a maximum of 15 minutes. Presentations must be sponsored by the County Administrator or a County Commissioner. z d) Appeals of the Planning Commission decisions before the County Commission shall be limited to 20 minutes of oral argument for each party and the appellant may reserve 5 minutes for rebuttal. e) When necessary, the Board of County Commissioners shall convene as the Board of Appeals to consider such appeals as may be required. Such hearings shall be scheduled for a time certain on the day it is advertised by the County Attorney. Such appeal shall be scheduled on the agenda. The Board shall consider the appeal and by motion adopt a resolution affirming or denying said appeal and all such motions shall include authorization for the Chairperson of the Board to execute said resolution when prepared. f) Tabled items: An agenda item under consideration by the County Commission may be removed from the table (tabled) by a majority vote of those Commissioners present. A motion to table any item that has received a second shall be voted upon without discussion. The effect of such a vote is to remove the item from consideration by the Commission. The item may be placed back on the table and considered by the Commission by a majority vote of the Commission but only if such vote takes place during the course of the meeting of the County Commission for which the item was on the agenda. Once that County Commission meeting is adjourned, either on the second day of a regularly scheduled meeting or at the conclusion of a special meeting, then the item may not be recalled from the table but must be placed on a subsequent County Commission meeting agenda by a person authorized to do so by these rules of procedure. Items that are required by general law or ordinance to be heard at a time certain public hearing may not be tabled but may be continued by a majority vote of the County Commission present to a time and a place certain but only if such a continuance is not contrary to general law or ordinance. g) Continuances: Unless contrary to general law or ordinance, any item on the County Commission meeting agenda may be continued by a majority vote of those County Commissioners present. The continuation must be to a time and place certain which may be later during the course of the same County Commission meeting or to a subsequent meeting. h) Reconsideration: During the course of a meeting and after a vote has been concluded on an agenda item, any Commissioner who voted with the majority may move for reconsideration of that item. If the motion is approved by a majority of those Commissioners present, then the Commission may ratify, rescind, or amend the decision made by their initial vote. Provided, however, in the case of any agenda item where a statute or a County ordinance requires published notice and a public hearing, then the approval of a motion for reconsideration will operate to stay the effect of the initial vote until the notice can be republished and a subsequent public hearing held. Upon conclusion of the subsequent public hearing, the Commission may ratify, rescind or amend the decision made by the Commission's initial vote. At the next regular County Commission meeting, any Commissioner may move to rescind or amend the decision on an agenda item that was the subject of a vote at the previous regular or special County Commission meeting. If the motion is approved by a majority of those Commissioners present, then the Commission may ratify, rescind, or amend the decision made by their initial vote. Provided, however, in the case of any agenda where a statute or County ordinance requires a published notice and public hearing, then the approval of a motion for reconsideration will operate to stay the effect of the initial vote until the notice can be republished and a subsequent public hearing held. Upon conclusion of the subsequent public hearing, the Commission may ratify, rescind, or amend the decision made by the initial vote. No previously voted upon agenda item may be the subject of a motion for reconsideration after the adjournment of the regular County Commission meeting that immediately follows the meeting at which the initial vote was taken. i) A County Commissioner may not engage in a discussion about a quasi judicial agenda item outside the confines of the County Commission meeting with any party having an interest in the item. If a County Commissioner is in doubt as to whether an agenda item is quasi judicial, then he or she should contact the County Attorney (or an assistant) before engaging in a conversation with an interested party. Section 1.04 — Presiding Officer, Election, Duties: a) Chairperson: The Presiding Officer of the County Commission is the Chairperson/Mayor, who shall be elected by a majority vote of the members present at the regular meeting of the BOCC in November. The November meeting in election years shall be on the date of the commencement of terms for newly elected commissioners as set by statute or within twenty-four hours after such date. Selection of the Chairperson/Mayor shall be by nomination from the floor, with no second required, followed by alphabetical roll call vote of Commissioners on each nomination, in order of the nominations made. Selection of the Vice Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tern shall be in an identical manner. b) Vice Chairperson: If, for any reason, the Chairperson is absent or unable to perform his/her duties, the Vice Chairperson, who will have been elected under the same circumstances as the Chairperson, shall 8 succeed him. If the Commission determines that the disability or absence is expected to extend for a period of time in excess of the length of the meeting at which this is determined, a new Vice Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of the members present at the meeting. Section 1.05 — Parliamentarian: The County Attorney or his/her designee shall act as parliamentarian and shall advise and assist the Presiding Officer in matters of parliamentary law. Section 1.06 — Attorney: The County Attorney, or designee, in his/her absence, shall be available to the Commission at all meetings unless excused by the Mayor or Administrator. He shall draw ordinances and resolutions for any member of the Commission when and as directed. Section 1.07 — Call to Order: The Chairperson shall take the chair at the hour appointed for the meeting and shall immediately call the Commission to order. In the absence of the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson, the Clerk shall then determine whether a quorum is present and in that event shall call for the election of temporary Chairperson. Upon the arrival of the Chairperson or the Vice Chairperson, the temporary Chairperson shall relinquish the chair upon the conclusion of the business immediately before the Commission. Section 1.08 — Roll Call: Before proceeding with the business of the Commission, the Clerk or his/her designee shall call the roll of the members in alphabetical order unless the Chairperson stipulates all are present and the names of those present shall be entered in the minutes. Section 1.09 — Quorum: A majority of the whole number of members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum. No ordinance, resolution or motion shall be adopted by the Commission without the affirmative vote of the majority of all members present. Should no quorum attend within thirty (30) minutes after the hour appointed for the meeting of the Commission, the Chairperson, or the Vice- Chairperson, or in their absence, the Clerk or his/her designee, may adjourn the meeting until the next day. Section 1.10 — Order of Business: All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public. Promptly at the hour set forth for each meeting, the members of the Commission, the County Attorney, the County Administrator and the Clerk shall take their regular stations in the Commission Chamber, and the business of the Commission shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in accordance with the agenda for the meeting. The agenda shall constitute the order of business, unless otherwise determined by the Mayor. Section 1.11 — Rules of Debate: a) Each meeting agenda must state: ""Any person who wishes to be heard shall, prior to the item being called, provide the Clerk with his/her name and residence, and the agenda item on which he or she wishes to be heard. An individual has three minutes. However, the first person representing an organization has five minutes to address the Commission. Subsequent speakers for the same organization have three minutes to address the Commission. For land use items, the time statement will be: "The petitioner and, if the owner is different than the petitioner, then the owner of the property that is the subject of the land use item, will be allowed 20 minutes to address the Commission. Other persons are allowed five minutes to address the Commission." b) Questions under Consideration: When an item of business has been announced by the Clerk, the Clerk shall notify the Chairperson of any persons who wish to be heard on that item. Upon conclusion of audience participation, the Board shall then consider the item. After the Commission has begun its discussion of the item, no further audience participation is permitted, unless the Mayor (or other Presiding Officer) permits a member of the audience to respond to questions from the Commissioners. A motion must be made and properly seconded in order for official action to be taken by the Board. The presenter/mover shall be allowed to address the Commission on the motion initially, whereupon each of the other Commissioners shall be allowed to address the Commission on the motion before the Board on any matter in alphabetical order as is done on regular roll call except the presenter/mover shall have the right to address the Board initially and to close the debate on the matter under consideration. 10 c) As to the Chairperson: The Chairperson or such other member of the Commission as may be presiding may move, second, and debate from the chair, subject only to such limitations of debate as they are by those rules imposed upon all members and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges of a Commissioner by reason of his/her being the Presiding Officer. d) Obtaining the Floor, Improper References to be Avoided: Every member desiring to speak for any purpose shall address the Presiding Officer, and upon recognition, shall confine himself to the question under debate, avoiding all personalities and indecorous language. e) Interruption: A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it be to call him or her to order or as herein otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, be called to order, he/she shall cease speaking until the questions of order be determined by the Presiding Officer, and if in order, he/she shall be permitted to proceed. Any member may appeal to the Commission from the decision of the Chairperson upon a question of order when without debate the Chairperson shall submit to the Commission the question, "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" and the Commission shall decide by a majority vote. f) Roll Call Vote: No member of any state, county or municipal governmental board, commission, or agency who is present at any meeting of any such body at which an official decision, ruling, or other official act is to be taken or adopted may abstain from voting in regard to any such decision, ruling or other official act, and a vote shall be recorded or counted for each member present, except when, with respect to any such matter, there is, or appears to be, a possible conflict of interest under the provision of Florida Statutes Sections 112.311, 112.313, or 112.3143. In such cases said member shall comply with the disclosure requirements of Florida Statutes Section 112.3143. Section 1.12 — Reading Minutes: Unless a reading of the minutes of a meeting is requested by a majority of the Commission, such minutes shall be considered approved without reading; provided that the Clerk delivers a copy thereof to each member of the Commission, the County Attorney and the County Administrator at least one full working day preceding the meeting at which the minutes will be approved. The minutes of prior meeting may be approved by a majority of the members present, and upon such approval shall become the official minutes. Section 1.13 — Votes by Roll Call: II The vote upon every resolution or ordinance may be taken by roll call in alphabetical order except the Chairperson shall be the last member called, and the vote shall be entered upon the minutes. Resolutions and ordinances shall be signed by the Presiding Officer at such meetings and by the Clerk before they are entered upon the minutes. Each resolution and ordinance shall contain, at the conclusion of the Passed and Adopted' clause, a list of the members of the Commission and the vote cast by each ('Yes', 'No', 'Abstention,' or 'Not Present'). Section 1.14 — Decorum: Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Commission shall be barred from further audience before the Commission by the Presiding Officer, unless permission to continue or again address the Commission be granted by the majority vote of the Commission. Section 1.15 — Sergeant -at -Arms: The County Sheriff, or his/her designated deputy, shall be the sergeant -at -arms at the Commission meetings and will carry out all legal orders of the Chairperson for purposes of maintaining order and decorum in accordance with these rules and Florida Statutes. Section 1.16 — Ordinances, Resolutions, Motions, Contracts and Other Documents a) Preparation of ordinances and resolutions: The County Attorney, when requested, shall prepare ordinances and resolutions, a copy of which shall be delivered to the County Administrator, whereupon the Administrator shall forthwith furnish a copy to each Commissioner. The original of the ordinance or resolution shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court at the time said ordinance or resolution is submitted to the Board for action. There shall be a public hearing on all ordinances other than emergency ordinances. The procedures as set forth in the Florida Statutes for adoption of ordinances shall be followed. b) Approval of Ordinances by County Attorney: All ordinances, resolutions and contract documents before presentation to the Commission shall have been reduced in writing and shall have been approved as to form and legality by the County Attorney. When so referred, the County Attorney shall affix his/her signature on the document certifying to the legal sufficiency and shall append his/her recommendations as appropriate. 12 c) Introducing for Passage or Approval: Ordinances, resolutions and other matters and subjects requiring action by the Commission must be introduced and sponsored by a member of the Commission, except that the County Attorney and County Administrator may present ordinances, resolutions and other matters or subjects to the Commission for consideration, and any Commissioner may assure sponsorship thereof by moving such ordinance, resolution, matter or subject be adopted in accordance with law; otherwise they shall not be considered. Any ordinance or resolution prepared at the request of a Commissioner, Administrator, Division or Department Director shall bear the name of the person on the document. Prior to placement on the Agenda of contracts or other similar matters to be approved by the Board as official actions, such document shall have been completely processed according to Administrative Orders issued by the County Administrator. d) All ordinances, resolutions, contracts and other documents approved by the County Commission must be signed by the Mayor, or Mayor Pro Tern in the absence of the Mayor, as promptly as possible. Section 1.17 — Adjournment: debate. A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and decided without Section 1.18 — Clerk, Minutes, Correspondence: a) The Clerk of the Circuit Court, or his/her designated deputy, shall act as Clerk ex ofl'icio to the County Commission. The Clerk shall prepare the minutes and attest to all resolutions and ordinances. b) The official minutes as prepared by the Clerk shall be as brief as possible and reflect on the very essential elements or actions. Those items specifically requested by the Board shall appear in the minutes in the manner as directed. c) The Clerk shall be custodian of the County Seal, affixing the seal to documents as appropriate and attest to the signature of the Presiding Officer on all ordinances, resolutions and other documents. Section 1.19 - Committees. a) Committees shall be established by Board of County Commissioner resolution and shall be for a specific time duration and purpose. 13 b) Function. 1. The Committee will only function in an advisory or investigative manner, as specified by the establishing resolution, and will have no legislative, directive or enforcement authority. 2. Any item requiring formal action shall be referred to the Board of County Commissioners for action at a regular meeting for consideration. 3. Committee meetings shall be properly noticed according to requirements of statute. All committee meetings must be held in the sunshine as mandated by Sec. 286.0105, Fla. Stat. 4. Committee reports to the Commission may contain recommendations of action but must contain all data and views concerning the matter so as to inform the Commission of all available information prior to their decision, and not simply consensus views. 5. The County Administrator shall provide the committee with a County employee to take written minutes of all Committee meetings. The County Administrator's Office shall also be the custodian of those minutes. c) Composition. 1. Committees may be composed of any number considered to be beneficial but appointments must be equally distributed among Commissioners, so as to reflect county -wide composition. 2. Committees shall elect their own respective chairperson. d) Committees shall adhere to the rules adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as Governing Rules Section 1.01 of these procedures. e) Committees shall provide the Board of County Commissioners with a written or oral report on a schedule to be determined by motion of the Board. Section 1.20 - County Commission Appointments Notwithstanding Robert's Rules of Order, appointments by the County Commission to committees, advisory boards, councils, commissions and 14 similar bodies established by resolution, ordinance or Florida statute shall be by affirmative vote of not less than three of the five members of the County Commission, unless otherwise stated in the enabling resolution, ordinance or statute creating the committee, board, council, commission or body. 15 ORDINANCE NO. 012 — 2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MONROE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE III, DIVISION 7, SEC. 2.202; CLARIFYING THE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR EX -PARTS COMMUNICATIONS AS ALLOWED IN F.S. 286.0115; AMENDING THE BOCC .ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO CONFORM THEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE MONROE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, government in Florida is conducted in the sunshine pursuant to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, thereby enabling the public to voice its opinions to local elected public officials; and WHEREAS, subsequent to a court decision finding an ex -pane communication to create a rebuttable presumption of prejudice and sufficient, if not rebutted, to invalidate a quasi-judicial action taken by a county commission, the legislature enacted Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115; and WHEREAS, Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115 sets forth certain requirements regarding the access to local public officials in connection with subsequent quasi-judicial proceedings, particularly such hearings on local government land use matters; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners passed and adopted Ordinance No. 035-2010 (Ordinance) providing for quasi-judicial proceedings and related ex-parte communications and according to the agenda item summary intending to adopt the required language in Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Ordinance as stated in the agenda item was to adopt procedures which "will remove the presumption of prejudice that may arise from ex pane communications with county officials;" and WHEREAS, the Ordinance contained language calling into doubt whether certain procedures under the statute were actually adopted; and WHEREAS, with this amendment, the adherence to the prescribed procedures shall make clear that the county intended to remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex pane communications with county officials by following the disclosure procedures in Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115(1); and WHEREAS, Florida Statute Sec. 286.0115 allows, but does not require, a county to adopt by ordinance or resolution the statutory requirements in order for those requirements to apply; and WHEREAS, the exact statutory language must be adopted to comply with the requirements removing the presumption of prejudice for ex-parte communications in quasi- judicial proceedings; Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Pane Communications NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, that: SECTION 1. Monroe County Code, Chapter 2, Article III, Division 7 Section 2-202(c)(1) is hereby amended to read: Section 2-202. Quasi-Judicial'Proceedings (c) Ex Parte Communications. (1) Generally Allowed. Any person not otherwise prohibited by statute, charter provision, or ordinance may discuss with any local public official the merits of any matter on which action may be taken by any board or commission on which the local public official is a member. Adherence to the following procedures shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with local public officials. a. The substance of any ex parte communication with a local public official which relates to quasi-judicial action pending before the official is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and made a part of the record before final action on the matter. b. A local public official may read a written communication from any person. However, a written communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a local public official shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. c. Local public officials may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit, or expert opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. d. Disclosure made pursuant to subparagraphs (a), (b), and (c) must be made before or during the public meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex pane communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. This subsection does not subject local public officials to part III of chapter 112 for not complying with this paragraph. Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Parte Communications SECTION 2. INCLUSION IN THE BOCC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES. Procedures for ex pane communications enumerated herein and in Ordinance 035-2010 shall be followed by the Board. The County Attorney is directed to amend the BOCC Administrative Procedures to incorporate the provisions contained herein and in Ordinance 035-2010 regarding ex parte communications. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. Should any provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. SECTION 4. CONFLICT WITH OTHER ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. SECTION S. INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. The provisions of Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be included and incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of the County of Monroe, Florida, as an addition or amendment thereto, and shall be appropriately renumbered to conform to the uniform numbering system of the code. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State as provided in Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 2& day of March, 2013. Mayor George Neugent Yes Mayor Pro Tem Heather Carruthers Yes Commissioner Sylvia Murphy Yes Commissioner David Rice Yes Com>Wpsioner Danny L. Kolhage Yes (SEAL) Attest: AMY HEAVILIN, Clerk By 1� op c) uty C14,grk w � a_ rz o a � we LIJ - J O tL M X Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Paste Communications BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORID By �� . .�. Mayor George Neugent CODNTYATTORNEY AS TO FORM* APPR SU M. GRIMSLEY :ISTA U NTY ATTORNEY ORDINANCE NO. 035 - 2010 AN ORDINANCE CREATING MONROE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE III, DIVISION 7; PROVIDING FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE MONROE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, government in Florida is conducted in the sunshine pursuant to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, thereby enabling the public to voice its opinions to local elected public officials; and WHEREAS, subsequent to a court decision finding an ex-parte communication to create a rebuttable presumption of prejudice and sufficient, if not rebutted, to invalidate a quasi-judicial action taken by a county commission, the legislature enacted Sec. 286.0115, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Section 286.0115, Florida Statutes sets forth certain requirements regarding the access to local public officials in connection with subsequent quasi-judicial proceedings, particularly such hearings on local government land use matters; and WHEREAS, the promulgation of an ordinance or resolution setting forth those procedures specified in paragraphs 1 through 4 of subsection (c) of Sec. 286.0115 and adherence to those procedures shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with county officials; and WHEREAS, Sec. 286.0115 allows, but does not require, a county to adopt by ordinance or resolution the statutory requirements in order for those requirements to apply; and WHEREAS, it is desired to set forth the statutory requirements and such supplemental requirements as may be adopted by means of a resolution; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, that: SECTION 1. Monroe County Code, Chapter 2, Article III, Division 7 is hereby created to read: Section 2-220. Quasi-judicial Proceedings (a) Definitions, (1) Local public official means any elected or appointed public official holding a county office who recommends or takes quasi-judicial action as a member of a board or commission. The term does not include a member of the board or commission of any state agency or authority. (2) Ex parte communications mean communications made in the absence of one or more of the affected parties. Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Parte Communications (3) Quasi-judicial act means the action of public officers applying regulations or rules to facts determined through a decision -making process. (4) Legislative act means the formulation of policy and adoption of a regulation or rule through which that policy is implemented. (b) Distinction between auasi-iudicial and legislative acts A quasi-judicial act determines the rules of law applicable, and the rights affected by them, in relation to past transactions, while a legislative or administrative order prescribes what a rule or administrative duty shall be with respect to transactions to be executed in the future. (c) Ex Parte Communications. (1) Generally Allowed. Any person not otherwise prohibited by statute, charter provision, or ordinance may discuss with any local public official the merits of any matter on which action may be taken by any board or commission on which the local public official is a member. If adopted by county or municipal ordinance or resolution, adherence to the following procedures shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with local public officials. a. The substance of any ex parte communication with a local public official which relates to quasi-judicial action pending before the official is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and made a part of the record before final action on the matter. b. A local public official may read a written communication from any person. However, a written communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a local public official shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. C. Local public officials may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit, or expert opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. d. Disclosure made pursuant to subparagraphs (a), (b), and (c) must be made before or during the public meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. This subsection does not subject local public officials to part III of chapter 112 for not complying with this paragraph. Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Parte Communications (2) Limitations on Ex Parte Communications. Pursuant to court opinions regarding unfair labor practices, no ex parte communications are allowed between the county commissioners and either members or representatives of the union, or members of management during a period of impasse. As other matters are identified for which ex pane communications are prohibited by law, this provision may be updated by ordinance or resolution. (d) Minimum Procedures to be Followed in a Ouasi-iudicial ProceediMg- Individual boards and commissions having authority to perform quasi-judicial functions, such as the Board of County Commissioners, Planning Commission, Contractors Examining Board, and the Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals may adopt procedures additional to the following. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible in civil actions. At a minimum, all quasi-judicial proceedings shall provide the Wowing: (1) Reasonable notice in advance of the proceeding; (2) An opportunity to call and examine witnesses; (3) An opportunity to introduce evidence; (4) An opportunity to cross examine witnesses; and (5) An opportunity to rebut evidence. (e) Rules Governing Quasi-iudicial Proceedings on Local Government Land Use Matters. (1) In a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, a person who appears before the decision -making body who is not a party or party -intervenor shall be allowed to testify before the decision -making body, subject to control by the decision -making body, and may be requested to respond to questions from the decision -making body, but need not be sworn as a witness, is not required to be subject to cross-examination, and is not required to be qualified as an expert witness. The decision -making body shall assign weight and credibility to such testimony as it deems appropriate. A party or party -intervenor in a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, upon request by another party or party - intervenor, shall be sworn as a witness, shall be subject to cross-examination by other parties or party -intervenors, and shall be required to be qualified as an expert witness, as appropriate. (2) In a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, a person may not be precluded from communicating directly with a member of the decision -making body by application of ex parte communication prohibitions. Disclosure of such communications by a member of the decision -making body is not required, and such nondisclosure shall not be Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Parte Communications presumed prejudicial to the decision of the decision -making body. All decisions of the decision -making body in a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters must be supported by substantial, competent evidence in the record pertinent to the proceeding, irrespective of such communications. SECTION 2. INCLUSION IN THE BOCC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES. Procedure 1.03(i) of the BOCC Administrative Procedures, is hereby amended to incorporate the provisions contained herein, for use by Monroe County in the conduct of quasi-judicial hearings. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. Should any provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. SECTION 4. CONFLICT WITH OTHER ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. SECTION S. INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be included and incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of the County of Monroe, Florida, as an addition or amendment thereto, and shall be appropriately renumbered to conform to the uniform numbering system of the code. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State as provided in Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 17'h day of November, 2010. �- o -n �, - ""- o rn Mayor Heather Carruthers Yes - � v Mayor Pro Tem David Rice Yes Cn rn o Commissioner George Neugent Yes -- , oner Sylvia Murphy Yes - ' = _ = rn !-7—loner Kim Wigington Yes -- c t\"3 �I fnTi CD m CD v BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS L. KOLHAGE, Clerk OF MONROE CO , FLORIDA D.C. By _ Duty Clerk yor/Chairperson Quasi -Judicial Proceedings and Ex Parte Communications - -JU"'J v cJVcJ AS TO - 4 �2 A. ; ' 1 u �� Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes: Online Sunshine Page 1 of 2 Select Year: 2012 - Go The 2012 Florida Statutes Title XIX Chapter 286 View Entire Chapter PUBLIC BUSINESS PUBLIC BUSINESS: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 286.0115 Access to local public officials; quasi-judicial proceedings on local government land use matters.— (1)(a) A county or municipality may adopt an ordinance or resolution removing the presumption of prejudice from ex parte communications with local public officials by establishing a process to disclose ex parte communications with such officials pursuant to this subsection or by adopting an alternative process for such disclosure. However, this subsection does not require a county or municipality to adopt any ordinance or resolution establishing a disclosure process. (b) As used in this subsection, the term "local public official" means any elected or appointed public official holding a county or municipal office who recommends or takes quasi-judicial action as a member of a board or commission. The term does not include a member of the board or commission of any state agency or authority. (c) Any person not otherwise prohibited by statute, charter provision, or ordinance may discuss with any local public official the merits of any matter on which action may be taken by any board or commission on which the local public official is a member. If adopted by county or municipal ordinance or resolution, adherence to the following procedures shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with local public officials. 1. The substance of any ex parte communication with a local public official which relates to quasi-judicial action pending before the official is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and made a part of the record before final action on the matter. 2. A local public official may read a written communication from any person. However, a written communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a local public official shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. 3. Local public officials may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi- judicial action pending before them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit, or expert opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. 4. Disclosure made pursuant to subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. must be made before or during the public meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. This subsection does not subject local public officials to part III of chapter 112 for not complying with this paragraph. (2)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), a county or municipality may adopt an ordinance or resolution establishing the procedures and provisions of this subsection for quasi-judicial proceedings on local government land use matters. The ordinance or resolution shall provide procedures and provisions identical to this subsection. However, this subsection does not require a county or municipality to adopt such an ordinance or resolution. (b) In a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, a person who appears before the decisionmaking body who is not a party or party -intervenor shall be allowed to testify before the decisionmaking body, subject to control by the decisionmaking body, and may be requested to respond to questions from the decisionmaking http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cftn?App—mode=Display_Statute&Search String=&URL=0200-... 4/29/2013 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes: Online Sunshine Page 2 of 2 body, but need not be sworn as a witness, is not required to be subject to cross-examination, and is not required to be qualified as an expert witness. The decisionmaking body shall assign weight and credibility to such testimony as it deems appropriate. A party or party -intervenor in a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, upon request by another party or party -intervenor, shall be sworn as a witness, shall be subject to cross-examination by other parties or party -intervenors, and shall be required to be qualified as an expert witness, as appropriate. (c) In a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters, a person may not be precluded from communicating directly with a member of the decisionmaking body by application of ex parte communication prohibitions. Disclosure of such communications by a member of the decisionmaking body is not required, and such nondisclosure shall not be presumed prejudicial to the decision of the decisionmaking body. All decisions of the decisionmaking body in a quasi-judicial proceeding on local government land use matters must be supported by substantial, competent evidence in the record pertinent to the proceeding, irrespective of such communications. (3) This section does not restrict the authority of any board or commission to establish rules or procedures governing public hearings or contacts with local public officials. History.—s. 1, ch. 95-352; s. 31, ch. 96-324. Copyright m 1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us http://www.leg.state.fl.usIStatuteslindex.cfin?App_ node=Display Statute&Search String=&URL=0200-... 4/29/2013