Item C28
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: May 16, 2001
Division:
Management Services
Bulk Item: Yes X
No
Department: Administrative Services
AGENDA ITEM WORDING:
Approval to spend police facility impact fees to purchase a mobile firing range.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
See attached Impact Fee Expenditure Request.
PREVIOUS REVELANT BOCC ACTION:
N/A
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approval as stated above.
TOTAL COST: $220,000.00 BUDGETED: Yes X No
COST TO COUNTY: $220,000.00 (Impact Fees)
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes
No X AMOUNT PER MONTH
Year
APPROVED BY: County Atty _ OMB/Purchasing ~ Risk Management_
~~.
James L. Roberts
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
DOCUMENTATION:
Included X
To Follow
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM # J:C1r
DISPOSITION:
Revised 2/27/01
.
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Impact Fee Expenditure Request
.............................................................................................................................................
Section 1 - To be completed by requesting department
Requestor: Richard D. Roth Title: Sheriff Date: 4/9/01
Facility Type: Mobile Firing Range Project Name: N / A
Total Project Cost (Capital only) $: 220.000.00
Description of project: Purchase a mobile firing range. This is a 53' trailer which
houses 3 lanes for target practice. This unit has appropriate HEPA filters and
sound insulation to be used unobtrusively in Monroe County.
Impact fee district: ~ Boundaries of Service Area: C":01mrrEtp Boundaries within
project's fee district: Yes lXJ No U. Type of project: CapitallXJ, Operational or Maintenance D.
Project start date: 5/1/01 Useful life of project: 10 Years (Must exceed 5 yrs. to qualify as capital project)
Project serves: Development that existed in 1986 0, Started after 1986 D, projected .beyond current year
IiI Would project have been needed to maintain level of service standards if no growtn had occurred since
1986: The growth in the Keys has brought about additonal environmental
restrictions which make it cost prohibitive to build int the Keys.
Because this unit is mobile. it will Rervice DiRtrict'R 1. 2 & 3.
.............................................................................................................................................
xx
Notes:
This seems like a worthwhile proiect.
.............................................................................................................................................
Reviewer:
Concur with Planning Review ~
~ wiO.. Cr,(,.
Title: IIJJI. CO. /lkI,.
Object to Planning review D.
Date:
~A..7~J
I ,
Notes:
.............................................................................................................................................
Section 4 - OMB Review
Reviewer. t~#d ~
Funds available: Yes ~~
Resolution prepared'\ Yes l:::J No D.
Project Code: 0 ft
Title: 6ud~ :L)lfRf'k Date:
Transfer request prepared: Yes ~ D.
Agenda Summary_~rep1redJ. Yes ~o D.
Date of SOCC Action: , ':::41U? t D -