Loading...
Item O2 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF COUNTY ORDINANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN that on Tuesday, November 20, 2001, at 3:00 PM at the Key Largo Library, Tradewinds Shopping Center, Key Largo, Monroe County, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, intends to consider the adoption of the following County ordinance: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 6-32, MONROE COUNTY CODE, CLARIFYING THE APPUCATION OF THE FOUR YEAR STATUTE OF UMITATIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE MONROE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, notice is given that if a person decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to. be based. Copies of the above-referenced ordinance are available for review at the various public libraries in Monroe County, Florida. Dated at Key West, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001 (SEAL) DANNY L. KOLHAGE, Clerk of the Circuit Court and ex officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida Publication dates Reporter Key West Citizen Keynoter 11/1-8 11/2-9 11/3-10 /-a oJ Commissioner Dixie Spehar ORDINANCE NO - 2001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 6-32, MONROE COUNTY CODE, CLARIFYING THE APPLICATION OF THE FOUR YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE MONROE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County did, on July 19, 2001, pass Ordinance No. 029-2001, thereby establishing Sec. 6-32, of the Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, said ordinance omitted operative language with respect to the applicability of the four year statute of limitations; and WHEREAS, said ordinance cited the four year statute as Section 95.11(3)(a) when it should have been Section 95.11(3)(c) or (p); and WHEREAS, the BOCC declined to seek further judicial review of the opinion of the 16th Judicial Circuit of Florida as it relates to code enforcement prosecution beyond the four (4) year statute of limitation; and WHEREAS, the BOCC of Monroe County has determined that it is necessary to revise Ordinance No. 029-2001 to disallow building permit issuance only to uses and improvements that may be successfully prosecuted by Monroe County Code Enforcement. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: . Section 1. Sec. 6-32, MCC, is hereby amended to read: Sec. 6-32. Unlawful uses and Improvements. As used herein. an "unlawful use or Improvement" is any use or Improvement. existing on the effective date of this Ordinance. which is capable of Monroe County Code Enforcement prosecution. Except for building permits that are limited exclusively to addressing imminent risks to property and public health and safety, no building permit shall be issued for any use of improvement involving all or any portion of a parcel (as defined in section 9.5-4 (P-1), Monroe County Code) which contains an unlawful use or improvement until the parcel is brought into compliance with the provisions of Chapter 9.5, Monroe County Code. By way of illustration and not limitation, permits may be issued for repairs and replacement of roof and other building structural components to the extent necessary to address imminent risks to property damage and public safety and health, such as for, but not limited to, the repair of leaking roofs and damaged roofs, walls, foundation; and violations of building, electrical, mechanical, and electrical codes. Anv such permit shall contain a provision requiring compliance with the provisions of Chaoter 9.5 of the Monroe County Code by a date specified in said permit. Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or prOVIsion of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. Section 4. The provisions of this ordinance shall be included and incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of the County of Monroe, Florida, as an addition or amendment thereto, and shall be appropriately renumbered to conform to the uniform numbering system of the Code. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon receipt of official notice from the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida that this ordinance has been filed with said Office. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of , 2001. Mayor George Neugent Commissioner Charles McCoy Commissioner Murray Nelson Commissioner Dixie Spehar Commissioner Nora Williams (SEAL) Attest: DANNY L.KOLHAGE, Clerk BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNlY, FLORIDA By By Mayor/Chairperson Deputy Clerk Jdord4yrlimit 8 County of Monroe Growth Management Division 2798 Overseas Highway Suite 410 Marathon, Florida 33050 Voice: (305) 289 2500 FAX: (305) 289 2536 Board of Countv Commissioners Mayor George Neugent, District 2 Mayor Pro Tern Nora Williams, District 4 Comm. Charles "Sonny" McCoy, Dist. 3 Comm. Murray E. Nelson, District 5 Comm. Dixie M. Spehar, District I MEMORANDUM DATE: Board of County Commissioners Timothy J. McGarry, Dire~ 1 Growth Management DivisifV "- November 19,2001 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Agenda Item 0-2; Public Hearing on An Amendment to Section 6-32, Monroe County Code The Growth Management Division staff has evaluated the proposed amendment to Section 6-32, Monroe County Code, that limits the prohibition against the permitting of improvements to only those properties that can be prosecuted through code enforcement proceedings within the four year statute of limitations. The staff finds that it can not recommend approval of the proposed amendment as written and believes that if approved it will only further encourage property owners to make improvements without permits, especially in situations where such permit approvals could never be granted. In considering this proposed amendment, the Growth Management Division staff wants to make the Board fully aware that even if approved, the pr0posed amendments to Section 6-32 conflict with the more stringent provisions in the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan. Unless these regulations and pertinent policies are amended, the Growth Management Division staff will be unable to fully carry out the legislative intent of the Board as contained in amended Section 6-32. In particular, certain Land Development Regulations strictly limit the staffs ability to carry out the policy wishes of the Board as listed and described below: . Section 9.5-55(c): This provision requires that any proposed development must comply with the Land Development Regulations before a building permit may be issued. Permitting Restriction: A permit for any improvement that would directly affect that specific portion of a structure or use that is illegal could not be issued. For instance no permits could be issued for improvements in an illegal downstairs enclosure, although improvements may be permitted in the legal above base flood portion of the structure. / -OL . Section 9.5-316.1: This provision contained in the floodplain regulations states that "no structure or manufactured home hereafter shall be located, extended, converted or structurally altered without compliance with the terms of this division in addition to other applicable regulations of this chapter." Permitting Restriction: A permit can not be issued for an improvement to any portion of a structure with an illegal below base flood enclosure that results in its structural alteration, such as expansion of a residence or changes in its load bearing walls. . Comprehensive Plan and Article V, Sections 9.5-141 throu~h 144 [Non- conformin~ Uses and Structures]: The Comprehensive Plan and Article V of the Land Development Regulations contain provisions that address "non-conforming uses and structures," which are those uses and structures legally established, but now non-conforming due to changes in the County's regulations. Although unpermitted improvements and uses are not considered non-conforming, from both planning and land use law perspectives, such unlawful improvements can not be deemed to have greater rights than non-conforming uses and improvements. Therefore, at a minimum, the permitting of unlawful uses and structures must follow the restriction governing the permitting and approving of non-conforming [legal] uses and structure. Section 9.5-143 prohibits the substantial improvement, enlargement, or occupation of additional lands by non-conforming uses or the structures in which the non- conforming uses are located, unless the use comes into conformity with the Land Development Regulations. Permitting Restriction: A permit can not be issued for the expansion, addition or improvements beyond ordinary repair and maintenance to a structure containing a non-conforming use, such as adding a bedroom to an illegal duplex. Section 9.5-144 restricts the substantial improvement substantial improvement, enlargement, or extension of non-conforming structures provided the non- conformity is not further violated. Permitting Restriction: A permit can not be issued for the expansion, addition, extension, or improvements beyond ordinance repair and maintenance to a non-conforming structure that further violates its non- conformity, such as expansion or substantial improvements to an illegal downstairs enclosure. cc: James L. Roberts, County Administrator James Hendrick, County Attorney