Item M4
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: March 20 , 2002
Division:
Growth Management
Bulk Item: Yes No X
Department:
N/A
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of resolution authorizing the Growth Management Division staff to
prepare a single, comprehensive request for beneficial rights determination on behalf of the owners of 21 building
permit applications awarded a ROGO allocation on Big Pine, which have not been issued permits due to the an
inadequate level of service on U.S. Highway 1.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Due to the level of service problems on U.S. Highway 1 on Big Pine Key, a moratorium
has been in place on all new traffic generating development, including single family residences for a total of almost
eight years. A total of 26 applicants have been waiting to be issued a building permit of which 18 have a ROGO
allocation and 5 have scored sufficiently high to receive an allocation, but require a nutrient reduction credit to be
formerly awarded an allocation.
All of the 21 applicants with a ROGO allocation, have been on hold for approximately five years. Six of these
applicants are presently suing the County for a permanent and temporary taking of property rights without
compensation.
In the staffs estimation, the shortest time period that the moratorium could be lifted may be six months to a year with
the programming of a cross-island connector and three years if the County must wait for completion of the proposed
three-lane facility. Therefore, the County staff believes that based on the results coming from the proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan process and recognizing the continued hardships and costs to these applicants, it would be in the
public interest to provide an opportunity for relief to these applicants through the beneficial use process.
The staff is recommending that it be authorized to prepare a single comprehensive request for beneficial use
determination on behalf of the owners of 21 building permit applications awarded ROGO allocations on Big Pine,
which have not been issued permits due to the inadequate level of service on U.S, Highway 1,
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: N/ A
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
TOTAL COST:
N/A
BUDGETED: Yes N/ A
No
COST TO COUNTY: N/A
REVENUE PRODUCING:
Yes N/A No
AMOUNT PER MONTH N/A Year
APPROVED BY:
County Atty X
DOCUMENTATION: Included
X
Risk Management _N/A_
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
To Follow
Not Required_
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM # ~~
County of Monroe
Growth Management Division
2798 Overseas Highway
Suite 410
Marathon, Florida 33050
Voice: (305) 289 2500
FAX: (305) 289 2536
Board of County Commissioners
Mayor Charles "Sonny" McCoy, Dis!. 3
Mayor Pro Tern Dixie M. Spehar, Dis!. I
Comm. Murray Nelson, District 5
Comm. George Neugent, District 2
Comm. Nora Williams, District 4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Timothy J. McGarry, AICP_L11I1
Director of Growth Manag~ l
March 5, 2002
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Resolution Authorizing the Staff to Prepare A Single, Comprehensive
Request for Beneficial Use Determination
Overview
The Growth Management Division staff is requesting authorization from the Board of County
Commissioners to prepare a single, comprehensive request for beneficial use determination, on
behalf of the owners of 21 building permit applications awarded ROGO allocations on Big Pine
Key, which have not been issued a building permit over the last five years due to the inadequate
level of service on U.S. Highway 1. A copy of the proposed authorizing resolution is attached,
Background
Due to the level of service problems on U.S. Highway 1 on Big Pine Key, a moratorium has been
in place for a total of almost eight years on all new traffic generating development, including single
family residences. A total of 26 applicants have been patiently waiting to be issued a building
permit. 21 of these applicants have been awarded a RaGa allocation and 5 have scored
sufficiently high to receive an allocation, but only require a nutrient reduction credit.
Of the 21 applications with ROGO allocation awards, 18 were processed prior to the nutrient
reduction credit requirement in July 1997 and the remaining three either purchased or obtained
their nutrient reduction credits through the normal process., Although the remaining 5 applicants
received sufficiently high scores to receive an allocation, they never received any nutrient reduction
credits due to the backlog of permits requiring credits outside of Big Pine Key.
By fall of this year, all the owners of the 21 permit applications with ROGO allocation awards will
have been waiting at least five years to be issued permits to build their residences. The remaining
five applications will have been in the system less than five years.
C: \DOCUMENT\A GENDA \beneficialreport,doc
Page 1 of3
It should be noted that five of the owners of the applications among the 21 are presently suing the
County for a permanent and temporary taking of property rights without compensation.
Issue
In the staffs estimation, the shortest period of time that the moratorium could be lifted may be at
least six months to a year with the programming of a cross-island connector. If the cross-arterial
does not go forward, the staff estimates that it will be at least three years if the County must wait
for completion of the proposed three-lane facility.
The County staff is concerned about further delays and hardships experienced by these applicants
until the level of service issue can be fully addressed, Five years is a very long period of time to
wait for a permit.
The modeling results for the proposed Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) demonstrate that Big Pine
Key can accommodate another 200 new dwelling units over the next 20 years without
compromising the Key Deer's and other endangered/threatened species habitats. Among these 200
new dwelling units accounted for by the proposed HCP are the 26 approved building permit
applications either with a ROGO allocation award or awaiting an allocation award once a nutrient
reduction credit is provided.
The County staff believes that based on the results coming from the proposed Habitat Conservation
Plan process and the recognition of the costs incurred by and hardships endured by these
applicants, it would be in the public interest to provide an opportunity for relief through the
beneficial use process. Although a beneficial use determination would allow these applicants to
receive building permits by overriding concurrency requirements of the County's Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations, the County Growth Management Division staff believes
that any such relief should be consistent with the proposed HCP. Thus, the number of building
permits issued should be limited to no more than 10 per ROGO year.
Therefore, the staff proposes to limit any comprehensive beneficial use determination to the first
21 building permit applications, which have received ROGO allocations. [This course of action
does not preclude the owners of the remaining five applications to file their own applications for
beneficial use.] Hopefully, the level of service issue will be addressed within the next year to allow
the remaining five to be issued with needing a beneficial use determination.
The staff proposes to prepare a single, comprehensive request for beneficial use determination on
behalf of the owners of the 21 building permit applications at no charge to the applicants. The
request will establish the case for the applicants based on the criteria for beneficial use
determination and will include recommended special conditions for the release of the permits to
ensure consistency with the proposed Habitat Conservation Plan, County regulations, and the
County's agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for review of County building permits
in designated environmentally sensitive lands.
C:\DOCUMENT\AGENDA \beneficialreport.doc
Page 2 of3
The prepared request and staff report will be presented to the Hearing Officer for determination of
beneficial use. The Hearing Officer will prepare a recommended determination for consideration
by the BOCC. Any grant of beneficial use by BOCC will still require DCA approval.
Recommendation
The Growth Management Division staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached resolution to a authorize it to prepare a single, comprehensive request for
beneficial use determination for the subject building permit applications on Big Pine Key,
C: \DOCUMENT\AGENDA \beneficialreport,doc
Page 3 of3
RESOLUTION
-2002
A RESOLUTION OF THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZING THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT DIVISION STAFF TO PREPARE A SINGLE,
COMPREHENSIVE REQUEST FOR BENEFICIAL USE
DETERMINATION ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS OF 21
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS AWARDED ROGO
ALLOCATIONS ON BIG PINE KEY WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN
ISSUED PERMITS DUE TO INADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE
ON U.S. HIGHWAY 1
WHEREAS, the Big Pine Key segment ofU.S, Highway 1 has been operating at
an inadequate level of service for almost eight years; and,
WHEREAS, this inadequate level of service has required that no building permits
for new residential buildings be issued on Big Pine Key; and,
WHEREAS, permits for 21 approved building permit applications awarded
ROGO allocations have been waiting nearly five years or more to be issued; and,
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Division staff believes that it will be at
least six months to a year before any likely relief is provided from the traffic concurrency
constraints on permitting;
WHEREAS, the results of the impact modeling for the proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan indicate that Big Pine Keys can accommodate an additional 200 new
dwelling units at 10 units per year, including the 21 to be built with the subject building
permits awaiting issuance; and,
WHEREAS, Policy 101.18.5, Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan
and Chapter 9.5, Article VI, Division 2, Monroe County Code, provide an administrative
process, called "beneficial use," to grant relief to property owners that may have been
denied reasonable economic use of their property; and,
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Division staff is of the opinion that costs
and hardship to these applicants from the more than a five-year delay provides probable
grounds for favorable consideration under the beneficial use provisions of the County's
regulations; and,
WHEREAS, beneficial use determination will allow the 21 permits to be issued
despite the traffic concurrency problem on Big Pine Key; now therefore
C: \DOCUMENT\ VESBENE\bigpinebeneficial.doc
Page 1 of2
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
1. The Growth Management Division staff is hereby authorized to prepare a
single staff-sponsored request for beneficial use determination for the 21 building permit
applications with ROGO allocation awards on Big Pine Key, which are to be processed in
accordance with the criteria and procedures in Sections 9.5-171 through 9.5-174, Monroe
County Code,
2. The Growth Management Division staff is also directed to incorporate in its
beneficial use report to the Hearing Officer specific recommendations that ensure
consistency with the proposed Habitat Conservation Plan, Florida Building Code, and
Land Development Regulations, and coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
in the release of any permits.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners, Monroe
County, Florida at a regular meeting of said Board held on the March 20, 2002.
Mayor Charles "Sonny" McCoy
Mayor Pro Tern Dixie Spehar
Commissioner Murray Nelson
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner Nora Williams
(SEAL)
Attest: Danny L. Kolhage, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
Mayor/Chairperson
C: \DOCUMENT\ VESBENE\bigpinebeneficia1.doc
Page 20[2