Item C41
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: 10/16/02
DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BULK IT~M: YES
DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of URS Purchase Service Order to provide an analysis of alternate approaches to
Runway 9, at the Key West International Airport.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The Federal Aviation Administration wiIJ fund 90% of this project, Florida Department of
Transportation 5%, and Passenger Facility Charge Revenue 5%.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION. Approval to submit PFC Application # 6,3/20/02.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: New agreement
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
TOTAL COST: $33,000.00
BUDGETED: Yes
COST TO AIRPORT: None
COST TO PFC: $1,650.00
COST TO COUNTY: None
REVENUE PRODUCING: No
AMOUNT PER MONTH/YEAR:
APPROVED BY: County Attorney X
OMB/Purchasing X
Risk Management X
KEY WEST AIRPORT DIRECTOR APPROVAL
~n
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
To Follow
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM #
Cf?/
DISPOSITION:
/bev
APB
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONTRACT SUMMARY
Contract #
Contract with: URS
I
Contract Purpose/Description: Provide Analysis of Alternate Approaches to Runway 9 at the Key West
International Airport
Effective Date: Execution
Expiration Date: 365 days
Contract Manager: Bevette Moore
(name)
loll'/II?-
for BOCC meeting on: 8/16/8%
# 5195
(Ext. )
Airports - Stop # 5
(Department/Courier Stop)
/./I-/tJ'J-
Agenda Deadline: gf<l/92
CONTRACT COSTS
Total Dollar Value of Contract: 33,000.00 Current Year Portion: _ 2,000.00
Budgeted? Yes Account Codes: 404-63064-530490-GAKA61
Grant: YES - FAA & FDOT
County Match: PFC Revenue
ADDITIONAL COSTS
Estimated Ongoing Costs: N/A For: .
(not included in dollar value above) (eg. maintenance, utilities, janitorial, salaries, etc.)
CONTRACT REVIEW
Date In
Changes
Needed
Yes No
Reviewer
Date Out
Airport Manager
~30/D,-
C/ ,.j 1 11 1
.1L-/~ L"'~
~f,?y [)L--
-1-1-
()\(<I ~
VY'l ('1) Pete~ Horton
( ) (...y J-L. . ~1 LLY..Y
~\ .' _ \ - M,arip Slavik
( ) ( +-- ", _"r:t~J
( ) ( ) ; 'Y/l3/f/a W:'l f JL
Rob Wolfe
-.1J3cI CYL
0121 Cu-
Risk Management
O. M. B.lPurchasing
y' 1.?-71 D c.
County Attorney
'1-9 y 1 ~'L-
Comments:
PURCHASE I SERVICE ORDER
FOR
MONRO}: COUNTY
To; URS
Purchase Service Order No. 01/02 - 37
Re: PSA Agreement, Dated 1-1-02
Resolution No.
Project Name: _Key ~ltemational - Analysis of AltelTlarjve ADDroaches to Runway 9
Description of Services:
(See altached Scope of Services)
Multiple of Direct Salaries
Lump Sum_-X
Reimbursable Expense
Days to Complete J~
Fee this Service Order
$ 33.000.00
Payment for Servi~es shall be in their entirety as per PSO.
Prepared by:
/~-7
P~:::-.3-
Milford A. Reiserl
Recommended by:
~-+t
Date: ~/22/02
Date:
,,-~ 0 - ~'L-
Accepted by:
CM~
Approved by:
~Dr c;l~1 GQtcio..
I
Date: 8/22102__
Dare:
N~UJl)'\4CJdft!<lCSll2i:!Jl.Sj\p()(1lI< '1ll'117WI'D. "'pol
SCOPE OF SERVICES
ANALYSIS OF AL TERNA TIVE
APPROACHES TO RUNWAY 9
Key West International Airport
"
I The Consultant Team will perform tasks necessary to identify and analyze up to
four (4) alternative approaches to Runway 9 at the Key West International
Airport.
Data previously collected on existing ,aircraft operations for the 12-month period
January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, used for the "Contour Update
2001" will be utilized for this analysis. No supplemental data will be collected. No
radar data will be obtained.
Task 1
Noise Evaluation of Existing Approaches to Runway 9
The team will assess the noise impact resulting from existing aircraft approach
operations on Runway 09 at EYW using a systematic approach which relies on
standard data included within the Integrated Noise Model (INM). The Team will
conduct a noise sensitivity analysis using existing airport operations data in order
to identify the three (3) most significant aircraft noise contributors conducting
approaches to Runway 09 at EYW. The team will evaluate the existing noise
exposure based the Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL), as well as
through the use of Supplemental metrics (e.g., Time Above a Threshold, Number
of Events Above a Threshold) and grid analysis. The team will identify the noise
exposure resulting from the existing aircraft approach operations on Runway 09,
and advise on feasible parameters for alternative approach procedures.
Task 2
Noise Evaluation of Alternative Approaches
The team will evaluate the noise benefits of up to four (4) alternative approach
procedures for Runway 09 at Key West International using the Integrated Noise
Model (INM) augmented through the use of custom noise analysis software. The
team will evaluate'the noise exposure of the alternative approach procedures
based the Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL), as well as through the
J _
use of supplemental metrics (e.g., Time Above a Threshold, Number of 'Events
Above a Threshold) and grid analysis. The noise levels associated with the top
three (3) aircraft noise contributors (identified in Task 1) will be calculated using
each of the alternative approach procedures. These noise levels will be
compared to the results of Task 1 and to each other to identify the quietest
- alternative with the least noise exposure to noise-sensitive land uses. When the
major 'aircraft noise contributors are identified for existing conditions, the team
will provide technical comparisons and formulate recommendations on noise
exposure.
APPROACH STUDY - REDUCED SCOPE
Page 2 of2
Task 3
Recommended Procedures
The alternatives will be analyzed based on an evaluation of the improvements iQ
noise exposure. One or more procedures may be recommended for
consideration as appropriate, particularly if the results of the analysis do not
show a clearly favored alternative, The client and stakeholders are' most
appropriate to weigh the tradeoffs.
If appropriate, the recommended approach procedure(s) will be tested for a 30-
day period. The public will be informed of the test, and asked to submit
comments in writing or via the airport noise hotline.
Task 4
Document Preparation
A document will be prepared that describes the approach procedure(s). The
document will also describe the results of the noise evaluation for each
procedure, as well as the basis for the recommendations and conclusions.
Task 4.1
Airport Review Document (Version 1)
Version 1 of the document will be prepared and submitted to the airport staff for
their review and comment. Five copies will be prepared (2 for the airport staff; 3
for the consultant).
Task 4.2
Ad-Hoc Committee I FAA Review Document (Version 2)
Version 2 of the document. will incorporate the airport staffs comments and will
be distributed to the Ad-Hoc Committee for review and comment. Version 2 will
also be distributed to the FAA for review and comment. Thirty copies will be
prepared (20 for the airport staff and Ad-Hoc Committee; 5 for FAA; 5 for the
consultant).
Task 5
Ad-Hoc Committee Me~tings
The Project Manager will report the progress of the study at the regularly
scheduled Ad-Hoc Committee meetings. All public involvement opportunities will
J _
be through regularly scheduled Ad-Hoc Committee meetings.- _
Task 6
Project Management
. This task involves the coordination and management of the non-technical
.aspect~ of the project.
>
c
~
....
en
en
w
a::
~
c
w
o
o
a::
a..
:I:
o
<c
o
a::
c..N
0..0
<co,
~~
3=-
~N
ts-...
-!,.:!,8
o 0 III
1t.......J
-
.... c... ,..... en
COIllCDO
Gl:;_ ~O
E g .!!
B '0 ~
oOQ...l!!
olt(l)~~
Iii%:
(1)_
-Ill
Cl::
0,3
.- Gl
CQ.
J;(I)
1:: u....iii
~ !.CDO
l:;(I)~O
C(2c
o.!!! e II)
'-0..- a::: ~
C > ~
~ c%:o
..., WIii%:
oiii
iO ... ~ 0
0~3:;;0
-IIlC
5i ~ '0
CI) 8 C .. l!!
c(w~~
~%:
...
-Gl
UCl
I'~ III
e c
0. III
:E
z
o
j:::
Q.
i2
o
en
w
o
~
en
c(
I-
CIliii
N 0
;0
.. l!!
a::: ~
%: 0
Iii%:
-
CD III
.... 0
~o
.. l!!
a::: ~
%: 0
Iii%:
-
III
o
o
--
l!!
:l
o
%:
CIl
==
a:
2
III
Gl
.c
u
III
e
Q.
Q.
c(
Cl
C
:;
III
)C
W
-
o
C
.2
-
III
~
iO
>
W
Gl
III
'0
Z
...
.:0::
III
III
....
0)
...
CD
lli
~
o
CD
----
N
I")
...
o
~
o
ll)
o
CD
~
"""
...
cq
...
~
----~..,.
N
a:l
"""
"""
l"l
...
~
<0
N
N
M
~
a:l
"""
o
N
o
"""
<0
C'i
~
o
a:l
N
ll)"
~
a:l
"""
"""
N
o
I")
q
;;;
<0
"""
~
...
~
---N--
...
a:l
III
II
.c
u
III
e
Q.
Q.
c(
~
:;
III
C
...
.!
Ci
-
o
C
o
i
:l
iO
>
W
I
"0
z
N
.:0::
III
~
<0
<0
cq
~
~
~
o
~
o
III
!
~
'i
u
e
0.
'i
'0
C
Gl
e
e
o
u
II
a:
c.;
.:0::
III
~
....
o
0)
~
N
...
ll)
....
q
...
t.'t
I")
0)
a:l
M
t.'t
0",," 0
0)<0 ll)
ll)0 ...
MC'i C'i
~tI't tI't
"""
"""
-----..
0",," 0
VN N
o
t.'t
o
---------..
a:l",,"
a:lo)
1")<0
ll)N
tl'tt.'t
ll)N
00
<01")
tI't tI't
a:l",,"
o 0
t.'t t.'t
-----.. ----
o 0
ll)
o
<0
t.'t
o
t.'t
-
------
o
---------..
a:l
a:la:l 0 0
I") I") t.'t t.'t
ll)ll)
t.'ttl't
<0
...
------------.. ----.0. ______
o
a:l
a:l
t.'t
a:l
o
I")
q
;;;
a:l
a:la:l 0 0
00
a:lV
a:l",,"
tI'ttl't
------------..
a:l",,"
Oll)
1")..-
Oll)
..-"tI't
tI't
-----------..
a:l",,"
C
o
:;
l!
III
Q.
!
0.
-
C
Gl
e
~
u
o
o
0,;.
.:0::
III
{!.
@"
c
o
'Uj
Q)
~
c
Q)
E
:::I
;::,,8
cO
.Q 3=
I/) Gl
CD '>
~~
5j~
eu.
:::I......
g m
0=
3= 'e
.51! E
ijj8
ere)
t:: 0
8.~
.= "'C
c(c(
..- N
-i--i-
III
Cl
.5
a;
Gl
:E
II
II
=
's
E
o
o
u
o
%:
,:,
c(
Iii
.:0::
III
III
....
o
t.'t
o
<0
"""
~
;;;
N
..-
<0
~
ll)
...
t.'t
N
..-
-
C
Gl
e
II
Cl
III
C
III
:E
U
Gl
"e-
o.
cD
.:0::
I/)
III
....
<0
"""
~
..-
t.'t
~ ~ g
,- N 0
ci N M
I") tI't c")
tI't ~
N
...
fN"
I")
I")
~
o
a:l
tI't
N
..-
10-
a:l
I")
a:l
-.i
tI't
V
<0
~
N
....
cD
t.'t
o
o
..-
o
t.'t
~
N
..-
0"
..-
tI't
o
N
0)
10-
I")
v
"'!.
a:l
t.'t
~
<0
I-
;n
W
U)
Z
W
0.
><
W
+
III
I a:::
C g
~ ~ ~
III W ...J
...J a; c(
iO .:0:: ....
~ ~ ~
u oo!. 0
II 0 Z
e' 5 ~
0. 0 Cl
'"