Item F4
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date:
Aoril16. 2003
Division: Public Works
Bulk Item: Yes
No
x
Department: Engineering
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval to advertise for bids for demolition of the Public Service
Building on Stock Island.
ITEM BACKGROUND: In November, 2001, County Administrative offices and the State
Department of Health were moved from the old Stock Island location to the New Gato Building on
Simonton street. The Public Service Building on Stock Island has been vacant since that time and
has become a safety concern due to poor condition of the structure, the air quality, rodents,
moldspores, aSbestos,inoperable fire alarm system, etc., in addition to maintenance costs for an
unusable building.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: This project is included in the Capital Improvements
Plan approved by the BOCC on 9/18/02 with revisions on 1/15/03.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval as stated above.
TOTAL COST:
N/A
BUDGETED:
Yes
x
NO
COST TO COUNTY: N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Infrastructure sales tax
REVENUE PRODUCING: YES_ NO-L AMOUNT PER MONT
YEAR
OMB/Pu
~ PAte (a?flCL. 4/12/tF?
Dave S. Koppel, P.E., County Engineer
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
~~
Dent Pierce, Division Director
DOCUMENTATION: Included ~ To follow
Not required
AGENDA ITEM # 7
DISPOSITION:
..
OO~~~2~~E
(305) 294-4641
BOARD OF COUNTY' COMMISSIONERS
(--- Mayor DIxie M. Spehar, DIstrict 1
Mayor Pro Tern Murray E, Nelson, District 5
'ON "., George Neugent, DIstrict 2
Charles "Sonny" McCoy, District 3
David P. Rice, District 4
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dent Pierce
Division Director/Public Works
CC: Sheila Barker
FROM: Bill Grumhaus ~
Risk Management Administrator
DATE: 3/27/03
~\ ~\"\)'>
-z,v
SUBJECT: Old Administration Building-Stock Island
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per your request, here are my thoughts on the subject. I visited the location with the county Safety
Administrator Priscilla London shortly after I joined Monroe County. This building clearly has seen
better days and I was very concerned about the state of disrepair it was in. There were clear
indications of rodent and insect infestation as well as mold and fungus that could very well be toxic.
There is no question that this building in its.cllrrent condition is a serious liability exposure. We
have liability insurance that would cover the county should an injury occur at this location, but we
must keep in mind that we are self-insured for the first $100,000 of any liability claim. We do not
have coverage for illness causes by the mold & fungus. We clearly have knowledge of the
conditions here and failure to take action to correct this situation could easily result in a claim of
that magnitude, or worse if a jury decided that we were grossly negligent with our inaction. We
could easily :fuce the possibility of a judgment higher than our sovereign immunity limit and a
potential claims bill. An abandoned building is a magnet for both children looking for a place to
play and transients looking for shelter. That is not a good mix. We also have to consider this
buildings location in relation to Bayshore Manor, our county assisted living fucility. While security
. ~/
~
measures are in place at Bayshore, there are Alzheimer's patients at that fucility who could
conceivably wander into the area in question. There is also the possibility that the rodent infestation
and disease carried by rodents in this building could impact Bayshore. In my opinion this building is
presently a disaster waiting to happen.
I really don't see renovation of this building as a viable option for a number of reasons. This
building is in an extreme state of disrepair. It contains asbestos that is extremely expensive to
remove. I have an even greater concern with the mold and fungus currently in the building. Toxic
mold has recently become to plaintiff's attorneys what asbestos was in the 80's. The mold will be as
difficult and as expensive to remove as the asbestos. . .maybe more so. The number of claims for
exposure to toxic mold in buildings is skyrocketing with very high judgments being awarded. Our
insurance policy specifically excludes payment for claims involving mold, fungus, or spores as is
common practice in the industry. I am attaching some re'Cent information on this toxic mold lawsuit
phenomenon for your information.
In my opinion, the best solution to alleviate this exposure is to remove this building as soon as
possible.
.~
".",,-'.-
/", .-
INTEROFFICE MEMO
!,'
DATE: 3/31/2003
TO: PIERCE-DENT
CC:
FROM: KING-JOHN . lC---:
RE: PUBLIC SERVICE BUll..DlNG
As requested, the following information is associated with the present "condition status" of the
Stock Island Public Service Building. As you are aware, the facility has been vacant since November
2001 and until recently, was filled with left behind items (i.e. desk, file cabinets, computers etc.).
Public Facilities has purged the bldg. of most items and debris.
Condition of Sewer S.ystem
The City of Key West "Lateral Testing Program" determined that the PSB and Bayshore Manor
sewer lines were leaking and had to be replaced / repaired. We recently procured a permit from the
City of Key West to replace the Bayshore Manor sewer line. That work has been completed, which
has effectively removed and disconnected the PSB from the lift station. Currently; the PSB is not
connected to any sewer system and ALL bathrooms are secured and not being used.
Condition of Water Lines
Based on the age and severe deterioration of the waterlines throughout the facility and the fact
that the sewer collection system has been disconnected, the water for the PSB has been shut off at
the main valve. We have had numerous leaks in waterlines that are in the facility, some of which are
in the overhead in areas of exposed friable asbestos. Without daily monitoring, these leaks could
cause ceiling collapse and possibly create a major asbestos fiber release.
Structural Condition
Periodic inspections of the facility reflect an accelerated deterioration of interior and exterior
walls, ceilings, doors and the entire roofing system. The bldg. has a major termite infestation which is
evident by the gross amount of visible termite ..droppings everywhere. Structural members (i.e. joist,
rafters etc.) in the roofing system also show signs of significant termite damage. There are many areas
in every wing of the facility that have had and currently have roof leaks. We are replacing the ceiling
tiles in these areas, according to our Asbestos O&M. I highly recommend the abatement of the
friable asbestos before the onset of tlle rainy season. The leaks are too numerous to effectively repair
without a major effort and cost expenditure. There have been a few break-ins by unknown
3/31/2003
1
3/31/2003
INmR6~d~kEM~"PUBI.IC.SERVIC~;~tlt~~~~;/"1~~'YP';"! >'~f:,f~~l?
',,:',-' -',' " '-,. {.,', i
individuals that gained entry thro windows and old Ale openings. They leave behind evidence such
as sleeping bags, old blankets and trash, etc.
The exterior concrete walls and tie beams have major cracking at comers and at window
locations. Exterior soffit and eaves are falling from water and termite damage, allowing unabated
rodent and insect entry.
Rodents
The most problematic intruder at the PSB are raccoons and the rats. Their presence is evident in
the overhead ceiling spaces. Rodent droppings are literally everywhere as they have unlimited access
to all areas of the facility. They constantly fall through ceiling tiles breaching the only barrier between
our employees and asbestos containing areas. I have inspected the facility closely and have
determined they are multiplying quickly. Due to their proximity with the friable asbestos this
continues to be a major issue that is hard to correct I estimate vast numbers are living in the facility.
Electrical
There are approximately seven major service drops located around the PSB complex. Some are
single phase and some are three phase, all drops have seriously deteriorated wire insulation at the
weather heads. There is a great array of mismatched panels and circuits that have been installed and
repaired over the last 55 years. Some of the wiring and panels are from the original construction.
These systems represent a great fue hazard. The ~sting Fire Alarm System is still partially on line
and operational. There are some devices that failed during the last alarm inspection and certification.
I do not recommend replacing these as they are in an area of Wing 4 that has high concentrations of
TSI friable asbestos.
Asbestos~ Mold and Lead
The Asbestos issue is well known and has been monitored and documented since the initial
ACBM Survey of January 1996. The major problem to date is in maintaining the barriers that isolate
the friable TSI (thermal system insulation). The TSI was used as insulation on the hot water and
steam lines that run throughout the facility overhead in every wing. There are 1'$1 drops in most
walls that previously supplied water and/or steam to sinks and specific equipment in the old hospital
rooms.
Based on the original ACBM Survey, there are many levels of flooring throughout the facility
that contains a percentage of asbestos. The VAT (vinyl asbestos tile) is generally found under
carpeting and existing rolled flooring materials. JUe condition of these materials are unknown and do
not present an immediate health concern as they are covered and not in a friable state.
The walls in most of the hallways have a small percentage of asbestos in the "popcorn" finish.
Tlus material as with the TSI has a potential health risk if it is disturbed mechanically and asbestos
fibers are released.
I have noticed an increase in the presence of visible mold and mildew. This is expected as we
have turned off all existing HV AC systems and removed all window air conditioners. This situation is
getting worse and will create a future problem if not addressed.
3/31/2003
2
3/31/2003
INTEROFFICE MEMO: PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING
,I;
'V
I am recommending that a "Limited Lead-Based Paint Assessment" be conducted before any
further actions are taken towards abatement This type of survey has never been conducted as far as
my records indicate. Giving the llge of the facility lead based paints are more than likely present and
need to be identified and located.
Conclusions and Recommendationi
The PSB is unsafe, unhealthy and a potential fire hazard. Securing the facility is an ongoing
challenge as the windows can be easily broken into due to deteriorated framing. The rodents cannot
feasibly be controlled without disturbing friable asbestos. The utility infrastructure is antiquated and
in the case of the sewer system is currendy disconnected and unusable. I higWy recommend
proceeding with abatement and demolition of this facility.
The following information reflects what it might take to bring the PSB facility back to life.
· Rough Estimates to Renovate PSB and Utility In&astructure
Remove Asbestos
$200 - 250,000.00
Ceilings, flooring and most interior walls to be removed to access asbestos
Install new sewer collection system
$50 -75,000.00
$250 - 300,000.00
$150 - 200,000.00
$25 - 30,000.00
$75 -150,000.00
Re-roof approximately 47,000 sq.ft. (11lcluding substrate as needed)
Replace termite damaged interior framing structure
Fumigation / Tenting for Termites
Replace some windows, repair exterior walls and soffit
Install new flooring, wallboard, doors as required, ceilings. Painting
$400 - 500,000.00
Upgrade Fire Alarm System and electrical distribution system
$200 - 350,000.00
$350 - 500,000.00
Install new HV AC Systems in each wing
Totals $1,700,000.00 to $2,355,000.00
As always, if I can be of further service to you or provide any additional information feel free to
contact me.
JK/JK
3/31/2003
3
A cost analysis of the Public Service Building was done given labor hours, rates, vehicle costs,
and costs for materials, from 11/01/01 thru 03/31/03. Data was retrieved from our Facilities
Maintenance work order system, MP2. Labor and vehicles are those associated with the Public
Facilities Maintenance Department. Below are the results:
Total LaborNehicle hours 11/01/01 thru 03/31/03 is approximately 4,100 hours.
Total cost for materials is approximately $2,800.00
Total cost for labor/vehicle is approximately $68,000.00
Grand total $70,800.00
..