Item Y2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: July 15. 2003
Division: Growth Manaaement
Bulk Item: Yes
No
x
Department: Plannina Deoartment
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: The second of two public hearings to adopt an ordinance by
amending Sec. 9.5-252, Airport District (AD), (c)(3) h. (AICUZ) and creation of Sec. 9.5-258.
AICUZ OVERLAY of the Monroe County Land Development Regulations. (Two public hearings required)
ITEM BACKGROUND: On February 15, 1977, the Department of the Navy approved the Air
Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Plan for the Naval Air Station, Key West, Florida. The
plan details standards for achieving compatible uses of land areas within the AICUZ area. On July
5, 1989, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 019-1989. This Ordinance added the Naval AICUZ
requirements to the Monroe County Land Development Regulations.
The proposed amendment is primarily administrative, moving the AICUZ from the airport zone to
the overlay section of the LDRs. In reviewing the original ordinance it was discovered that the text
of the amendment contained errors and did not accurately reflect the matrix (Exhibit B). The
original ordinance, with the errors, was adopted in 1989. The errors have been corrected in the
proposed new text.
This proposed amendment was reviewed and approved at a regular meeting of the Monroe County
Development Review Committee on January 13, 2003.
This amendment was reviewed and approved at a publiC hearing of the Monroe County Planning
Commission on April 9, 2003.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On July 5, 1989, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 019-
1989. This Ordinance added the Naval AICUZ requirements to the Monroe County Land
Development Regulations. The first of two BOCC public hearings was held on May 21, 2003.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
TOTAL COST:
N/A
BUDGETED: Yes N/A
No
COST TO COUNTY: N/A
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes ~ No
SOURCE OF FUNDS: ~
AMOUNT PER MONTH~ Year
APPROVED BY:
County Atty X
Risk Management _
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
To Follow
Not Required
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM #
V1
)./-
Revised 1/03
AMENDMENT TO THE MONROE COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Board of County Commissioners
Harvey Government Center
July 15, 2003
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO MONROE COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
A request filed by the Monroe County Planning Commission to amend the
Monroe County Land Development Regulations by amending Sec. 9.5-252.
AIPORT DISTRICT (AD). (C)(3)h.(AICUZ) and inclusion of Sec. 9.5-258 AICUZ
OVERLAY.
Land Development Regulations text amendment
Staff
Approval
February 5, 2003
January 13, 2003
Staff Report
DRC
Approval
Resolution #003-03
PC
Approval
April 9, 2003
May 21, 2003
Resolution #P23-03
SOCC
Approval
Transmittal Resolution
BOCC STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Fred Gross, Director of Lower Keys Planning Team
SUBJECT: Amendment to Sec. 9.5-252. Airport District (AD).
(c)(3)h. (AICUZ) and inclusion of Sec. 9.5-258.
AICUZ OVERLAY
DATE: June 23, 2003
I. Background:
On February 15, 1977, the Department of the Navy approved the Air
Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Plan for the Naval Air
Station, Key West, Florida. The plan details standards for achieving
compatible uses of land areas within the AICUZ area. Within the
AICUZ area, there are 3 Accident Potential Zones (A, B, and C). In
these Accident Potential Zones, no new residential uses are to be
permitted. Additionally, there are 2 high noise zones (CNR 3, and CNR
2). In CNR 2 zones, new residential development is permitted
provided noise attenuation measures are taken. However in CNR 3
zones, no new residential development is permitted even with noise
attenuation. It should be noted that, in 1977, when these restrictions
were applied, insulating materials and noise attenuation methods were
not as sophisticated or as effective as they are today. Upon
completion of the AICUZ Study and the adoption by the County of the
AICUZ overlay district, the Department of the Navy purchased most,
but not all, of the residentially zoned property in the CNR 3 AICUZ
districts.
On July 5, 1989, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 019-1989. This
Ordinance added the Naval AICUZ requirements to the Monroe County
Land Development Regulations.
In anticipation of the adoption of the AICUZ Ordinance, the
Department of the Navy purchased most of the residentially zoned lots
within the zone. However, privately owned residentially zoned parcels
still remained in CNR 3 AICUZ overlay zones. While most of these lots
are developed, there remained a number of undeveloped lots where
the owners have expressed a desire to construct a new residence.
Page 1 of 6
H :\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
In the existing LDR's, the issuance of residential building permits
within the CNR 2 AICUZ overlay zone requires only that conditions
addressing sound attenuation be met. However, under no
circumstance may we issue any residential building permit in the CNR
3 AICUZ overlay zone. The result is that the privately owned
residentially zoned parcels cannot be developed and a "taking" of the
property may have occurred. Such a determination would require the
County to financially compensate the owners.
This proposed amendment was reviewed and approved at a regular
meeting of the Monroe County Development Review Committee on
January 13, 2003.
The proposed amendment to the AICUZ was presented to the Planning
Commission on February 12, 2003. At that meeting the Planning
Commission had no issues with the revisions in the LDR's which
intends to add the AICUZ Map and the Land Use Objectives Matrix to
Sec. 9.5-258. The Commission however, after hearing testimony from
the Navy, voted to delete the amended portion of the text that would
permit residential uses to be developed in the CNR-3 zone (high noise
zone). The Navy expressed concern that the permitting of new
residential development in the CNR-3 zone would limit their ability to
fulfill their mission at the Air Station. The proposed amendment has
been modified to address the Commission's concerns.
The proposed amendment is primarily administrative, moving the
ACUZ from the airport zone to the overlay section of the LDRs. In
reviewing the original ordinance it was discovered that the text of the
amendment contained errors and did not accurately reflect the matrix
(Exhibit B). The original ordinance, with the errors, was adopted in
1989. The errors have been corrected in the proposed new text.
This amendment was reviewed and approved at a public hearing of
the Monroe County Planning Commission on April 9, 2003.
The 1st of two required BOCC public Hearings was held on May 21,
2003.
II. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Commission finds that land use regulations within an Airport
District should be confined to on-airport development. Regulations
that direct off-airport development are more appropriately located
in a discrete overlay section of the Code.
Page 2 of 6
H :\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
2. The Commission finds that the proposed changes are consistent
with Section 9.S-S11(d)(S) b. (iv) New Issues and (v) Recognition
of a need for additional detail or comprehensiveness.
3. The Commission finds that the proposed changes are consistent
with the goals of the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive
Plan.
III. PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Sec. 9.5-252. Airport District (AD)
(a) These districts provide classifications of property for existing
or future airports and regulate uses within the boundaries of public
and private airports, and uses around, adjacent, and in the approach
zones of public and private, ~nd milit~ry airports in order to: ...........
Sec. 9.5-252.( c)(3)
R Rcst-:ct::ons fo- FR:t:t;:ry ;:;J:_poFts' rri.,~tel" o"'ned
. , , , , , I' '" I I' I. y 7 ...
property ~dj~cent to the N~v~1 Air St~tion, Boc~
Chic~, ~I::;o kno\vn ~s NAS Key 'Nest, sh~1I be
developed in ~ccord~nce ,-,,'ith the m~p prep~red by
the U.S. N~'1'f known ~::; figure ^ or ~s upd~ted by
the U.S. N~vy. This m~p W~::; prep~red in conjunction
with the United St~tes N~'y"t's Air Inst~lI~tion
Comp~tible Use Zone Study (AICUZ). A true copy of
figure A is ~tt~ched hereto ~nd m~de ~ p~rt of this
subsection.
(i) The I~nd use objecti'les set forth in figure A
~nd the ~ccomp~n)'ing I~nd use objectives
m~trix ::;et forth in figure B were determined by
ev~lu~ting the ~irport oper~tions ~t NAS Key
'Nest, in terms of composite noise r~ting (CNR)
zones ~nd ~ccident potenti~1 zones (ArZ). A
copy of figure B is ~tt~ched hereto ~nd m~de ~
p~rt of this subsection.
(ii) The I~nd use objective sho'tm in figure A ~nd
figure B sh~1I be used in determining the
allo'^,~ble I~nd uses for the "~rious AICUZ.
E~ch I~nd u::;e c~tegory w~s ev~lu~ted in terms
of comp~tibility for e~ch I~nd use in terms of
Page 3 of 6
H :\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
density of popul;Jtion, density of structures,
explosion h;Jz;Jrds, ;Jir pollution height
obstructions, ;Jccident potenti;J1 zones, ;Jnd
composite noise r;Jting zones. The eV;Jlu;Jtion
resulted in r;Jtings of:
1. No new development;
2. Restricted nelll development; ;Jnd
3. No restrictions.
Ciii) L;Jnd use c;Jtegories 'Nere r;Jted ;JS "restricted
new development" if ;Jny ;Jctivity or ;Jctivities
Y;ithin the c;Jtegory were cl;Jssified ;JS
incomp;Jtible. The v;Jrious AICUl ;Jre coded ;JS
follows:
1. Accident potenti;J1 zone A CArl A), the
most critic;J1 ;Jccident potenti;J1 zone;
2. B3: Accident potenti;J1 zone B CArl B),
the ;Jre;J which h;JS ;In identifi;Jble
;Jccident potenti;J1 but Ie:::;:::; th;Jn Arl A;
3. B2: Accident potenti;J1 zone C CArl C),
the ;Jre;J which is les:::; critic;J1 th;Jn Arl C
but still m;J'f pos:::;ess potenti;J1 for
.Jccident:::;; high noise imp;Jct, CNR zone
3t
4. C2: Accident potenti;J1 zone C, moder;Jte
noise imp;Jct, CNR zone 2;
S. C1: Accident potenti;J1 zone C, 10':; noise
imp;Jct, CNR zone 1;
6. 3: High noise imp;Jct, CNR zone 3;
7. 2: No ;Jccident potenti;J1 zone, moder;Jte
noise imp;Jct, CNR zone 2.
Sec. 9.5-258. AICUZ OVERLAY
(8) This district orovides classifications of property for existing or
future militarv airoorts and regulates uses around. adjacent. and in
the aooroach zones of military airoorts in order to:
Page 4 of6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
(1) Establish the control of obstructions and construction of
structures affecting navigable airspace in accordance with
criteria delineated in volume XI, part 77 in federal aviation
regulations, Florida Department of Transportation
regulations, and this section: and
(2) Protect military airoorts against encroachment, to
implement aporopriate noise abatement strategies, and to
regulate develooment and reduce oublic exoosure of
community activities, which are not compatible with
military airport ooerations.
a. Restrictions for military airDorts: Privately owned
property adjacent to the Naval Air Station, Boca
Chica, also known as NAS Key West, shall be
developed in accordance with the map prepared by
the U.S. Navy known as figure A or as updated by
the U.S. Navy. This map was prepared in conjunction
with the United States Navy's Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone Study (AICUZ). A true copy of
fiqure A is attached hereto and made a Dart of this
subsection.
1. The land use objectives set forth in figure A and
the accomoanying land use objectives matrix set
forth in figure B were determined by evaluating
the airoort operations at NAS Key West, in terms
of comoosite noise rating (CNR) zones and
accident ootential zones (APZ). A CoOY of figure B
is attached hereto and made a part of this
subsection.
2. The land use objective shown in figure A and
figure B shall be used in determining the
allowable land uses for the various AICUZ. Each
land use category was evaluated in terms of
comoatibility for each land use in terms of
density of pooulation, density of structures,
explosion hazards, air oollution height
obstructions, accident ootential zones, and
composite noise rating zones. The evaluation
resulted in ratings of:
i. No new development: and
Page 5 of 6
H: \Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
ii. Restricted new development; and
Hi. No restrictions.
3. Land use categories were rated as "restricted new
development" if any activity or activities within
the category were classified as incompatible. The
various AICUZ are coded as follows:
i. A: Accident potential zone A (APZ-A), the
most critical accident potential zone; and
ii. B3: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B),
the area which has an identifiable
accident potential but less than APZ-A,
high noise impact, CNR zone 3; and
Hi. B2: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B)
the area has an identifiable accident
potential but less than APZ-A, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2; and
iii. C3: Accident potential zone C (APZ-C),
the area which is less critical than APZ-B
but still may possess potential for
accidents; high noise impact, CNR zone
3; and
v. C2: Accident potential zone C, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2; and
vi. C1: Accident potential zone C, low noise
impact, CNR zone 1; and
vii. 3: No accident potential zone: high noise
impact, CNR zone 3; and
viii. 2: No accident potential zone, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2.
I. Underlined text is new. Strikethrough text is deleted.
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of fact above, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of the proposed text amendment to the Monroe County
Board of County Commissioners.
Page 6 of 6
H :\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC Staff Report.doc
BOCC ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. -2003
AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS APPROVING A REQUEST OF THE MONROE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO AMEND THE MONROE COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING SECTION 9.5-252(C)(3)h.
(AICUZ) AND CREATING SECTION 9.5-258; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION
INTO THEMONROE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on February 15, 1977, the Department of the Navy approved the Air
Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Plan for the Naval Air Station, Key West,
Florida; and
WHEREAS, on July 5, 1989, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 019-1989 adding the
Naval AICUZ requirements to the Monroe County Land Development Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is primarily administrative, moving the
AICUZ from the airport section to the overlay section ofthe LDR's; and
WHEREAS, in reviewing the original ordinance it was discovered that the text of
the amendment contained errors and did not accurately reflect the matrix (Exhibit B); and
WHEREAS, the original ordinance, with the errors, was adopted in 1989 and;
WHEREAS, the errors have been corrected in the proposed new text; and
WHEREAS, this proposed amendment was reviewed and approved at a regular
meeting of the Monroe County Development Review Committee on January 13,2003;
and
WHEREAS, during a regular meeting held on April 9, 2003 the Monroe County
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed text, reviewed the
recommendations of staff, received testimony from the Navy Department; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after reviewing the staff report voted to
recommend the amendment to Sec. 9.5-4 (A-5) to the Board of County Commissioners;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that there is a need to
make the changes outlined above; and
Page 1 of 6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC ORD .doc
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed changes
are consistent with Section 9.5-511(e) Typographical or Drafting Errors; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners find that the proposed changes
are consistent with the goals of the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on May 21,2003, the first of two required Board of County
Commissioners public hearings was held; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Monroe County Board of County
Commissioners that the following amendment to the County Code be adopted;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. Section 9.5-252 Airport District (AD), Monroe County Code, IS hereby
amended as follows:
Sec. 9.5-252. Airport District (AD)
(a) These districts provide classifications of property for eXlstmg or future
airports and regulate uses within the boundaries of public and private airports,
and uses around, adjacent, and in the approach zones of public and private;
and military airports in order to: ...........
Sec.9.5-252.(c)(3)
h. Rcstrictiens fer military airperis: Privately ovmed property adjooent to the
Naval i\ir Station, Boca Chica, also known as NfA.S Key 'Vest, shall be
deyeloped in acoordance with the map prepared by the U.S. Navy kno'lm as
figure fA. or as updated by the U.S. Nayy. This map vias prepan::ld in
conjWlction with the United States Navy's :\ir hlstallation Compatible Use
Zone Stl:ldy (AICUZ). fA. trne copy of figure fA. is attaehed hereto and made a
part of this sabseetion.
(i) The land l:lse objectives set forth in figure /'l. and the
aecompanying land l:lse objeetives matrix set forth in figl:lfe
B '.vere determined by evaluating the airport operations at
NfA.S Key \Vest, in terms of composite noise rating (CNR)
zones and aceident potential zones (APZ). fA. copy of figure
B is attached hereto and made a part of this sl:lbseetion.
(ii) The land l:lse objective shown in figure fA. and figu.re B shall
be used in determining the allowable land l:lses for the
various fA.ICUZ. Eaeh land l:lse oategory was evaluated in
terms of oompatibility for eaeh land use in terms of density
of population, density of struotl:lres, explosion hazards, air
Page 2 of 6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC ORD .doc
polhltion height obstructieBs, aecident potential zones, and
composite noise rating ZOBes. The 6'/all:lation resl:llted in
ratings of:
1. No new development;
2. Restricted neVi d6'/elopment; and
3. No restrictions.
(iii) Land use categories 'Nere rated as "restricted new
de'/elopment" if any activity or activities within the
category were classified as iFlcompatible. The variOl:lS
AICU2 are coded as fo11o':/s:
1 ^. ..:l . I ^ l ^ D'7 ^ '1 L
1. "..ccluent potentIa zone ".. \" U" L ""J, 11"1e most
critical accident potential zone;
2. H3: .^..ccideFlt potential zonEl H (:\P2 H), the area
which has an identifiable aocident potential bat less
than :\PZ }..;
3. H2: .^..ccident potential zone C (APZ C), the area
which is less critical than "'\PZ C bat still may
possess potential for aceidents; high noise impaet,
CNR zone 3;
4. C2: .^..ccident potential zone C, moderate noise
impact, CNR zone 2;
5. Cl: :\ccident potential zone C, 10\'/ noise impact,
CNR zone I;
6. 3: High noise impact, CNR zone 3;
7. 2: No accideFlt poteFltial zone, moderate nOIse
impact, CNR zone 2.
Section 2. the following Section is hereby added:
Sec. 9.5-258. AlCUZ OVERLAY
(a) This district provides classifications of pro pert v for existing or future military
airports and regulates uses around. adiacent. and in the approach zones of military
airports in order to:
(1 ) Establish the control of obstructions and construction of structures affecting
navigable airspace in accordance with criteria delineated in volume XI. part
77 in federal aviation regulations. Florida Department of Transportation
regulations. and this section: and
Page 3 of 6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC ORD .doc
(2) Protect military airports against encroachment. to implement appropriate
noise abatement strategies. and to regulate development and reduce public
exposure of community activities. which are not compatible with military
airport operations.
3. Land use categories were rated as "restricted new development"
if any activity or activities within the category were classified
as incompatible. The various AICUZ are coded as follows:
i. A: Accident potential zone A (APZ-A). the most
critical accident potential zone: and
11. B3: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B), the area
which has an identifiable accident potential but less
than APZ-A, high noise impact. CNR zone 3: and
111. B2: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B) the area has
an identifiable accident potential but less than APZ-
A. moderate noise impact. CNR zone 2: and
Page 4 of 6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC ORD .doc
IV. C3: Accident potential zone C (APZ-C). the area
which is less critical than APZ-B but still may
possess potential for accidents: high noise impact.
CNR zone 3: and
v. C2: Accident potential zone C. moderate noise
impact. CNR zone 2; and
VI. C 1: Accident potential zone Co low noise impact.
CNR zone 1; and
Vll. 3: No accident potential zone; high noise impact.
CNR zone 3; and
Vlll. 2: No accident potential zone, moderate nOIse
impact. CNR zone 2.
. Underlined text is new.
. Strikethrough text is deleted.
Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change or provision of this
ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are
hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the
State of Florida, but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the Department
of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in
compliance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
(This page has been intentionally left blank)
Page 5 of 6
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\BOCC ORD .doc
JUN-26-03 16,48 FROH,HONROE ~OUN~~ Aii. U~~I~~
.U'~IO~~t:l~~~.b
I-'A~i:.
. / .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County,
Florida at a regular meeting held on the day of , A.D., 2003.
Mayor Dixie Spehar
Mayor Pro T em MUrray Nelson
Commissioner Charles "Sonny" McCoy
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner David Rice
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Mayor Dixie Spehar
(SEAL)
ArrEST: DANNY KOHLAGE, CLERK
DEPUTY CLERK
8
Page 6 of6
C:\TEMP\BOCC ORD AICUZ.062403.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
'.
".
"
"'.
"
....,""
"
"'.
"
",
....,..
\.
\
\
i
.
;
T
p --
, .'
,/ //
"/ I
/"
,/ ""
/ 1/
, ,/'
,/
1'/
,/' /'
,/' ,,/'-
f /
\....,l'
:
6
~"ii
c~
::10
0-
oi
Q)E
OQ)
~C)
Cea
Oc
:Eea
:E
~
~
C!J
.
/
i
!
"
..
..
0(
=
~
~
..
c
S
I
t
,,,,I
,,,'
.,,'
t'"
!
\
\.
\
, \
. ,
. I
'-
II~',
""" ......
N
::>>
()
<
..
Z+M
~
(
lii~ I
IIIIII
I I -
EXHIBIT "B"
ll'lll'M 3~I'anl. .SlS310~
lli)lO) - 1011'31)3'
lil'. - 1011'il)]'
11"4 - NOlll3.)3.
'131' 11.041 - 101!'3.'31
~'09 - 1011'31'31
(1301S3AI' 143'13) ".R1,n)IIO'
13111'lln/NOll'110dSN'll
3All)'.113 - lllSnONI
ONI.nl),~nN," - lllsnONI
w
=>>
3'IAI3$ - lllsnONI
I
-'
")103" - "NOlln111SNI
"NOll,)n03 - "MOlln111SMI
3:>>1 HO
3',13'OH. - "1:>>13""0:>>
'1'131 - "1:>>13""0)
1I0ln - "1 )113""0:>>
(,/no te-zli 1111N30 HOIH - "11N30IS31
("no Zt-t) 111S130 "nI03M - ,,11N301531
(,/no '-I) AlISN30 .A, - ,,11N301531
".nl,n'IIO' - ,,11N301531
S3"OH 3'110" - "11N30IS31
~tt~~~ ~~~tt~~ ~t~f~ ~~~tt~ ~r~~t~ ~~rr~ ~tt\
...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ......
...... ...... ........ ...... ......
:.:..:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:..:.: :.:..:.:.:.: :.:..:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:..:.: :.:.:.:.:.: .:.:.:..:.:.:.
.... .." .... ............ .." .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ............ .. .. .. .... ..............
............ ............. ........... ............ ............ ........... .............
....... ....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
............ ............. ............ ............. ............. ............ ...............
:.:.:.:.:.:. "..:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:........
...... ...... ...... ...... ......
:::::::::::: :::::::::::: .::::=::::::: :=:::=:=:=: ::=:::=:=:=::
tff t~It Itt~ ~~tt~ ttt~
..
..
==
..
..
r-i
==
-
...
~
...
~
~ N
en -
z .
LIJ I&J ~ cot u
2 N N
> Z - -
~ - .
- I&J . . ....u ......
l- S Q~ Z .. . cot .u u'" UU U . ..
0' 00
ld Q .... ....- ....' ....- ....' .... ... ... ...
I&J . .. . .. . .- ....
> ~ 0 Ou o~ OU O~ o. ... . ...~
... .... ... e.>> .... ... e.>> ...u ..0 ..u
8 ~ I&JI&J (J .. .. -.... -..
ii: en ... ... .....L ..... .....L .....' ~ "'L
~> .. ..~ ..z ..~ ..z .. .~ .z
t; -e.>> -e.>> -- -~ ....u w-
~ (JI&J UJ- ~ ~.. ~ ~.. .... t- e.>> ...... ....
-0 . .L ..... .L ..... ... OL ow
I&J a: I&J Z .... ....z ..... ....z ..... WL LZ L"
lH t;~ .... ....- t-- ...- .... - ....z -
z a: 0 0 0 00 0 00 0- .... ....0
... L.... L. ... .... L. ... .w ..
i I&JI&J i N fit fit .... ..... ....
:;:)x .... ....- .... .... ....- .... .... ~. 0- ow
a:z . .0 . .... .0 . .... .- -0 -...
.... ..... ...... ..... w.. ....0 e.>> . uc
- 0 0 0_ 0 0_ o. e.>> U.
!2~ ~II N - :I: -.... -z -.... cz .. ...
U UCD uo UCD uo ::=1 CD .
::> u e.>>- e.>>o e.>>- e.>>o o- II
.. ..z ..z ..z ..z .. ... .z
:3:e (.)
- .. ... N .., N cot N
<( . . u U U
. ..
PC RESOLUTION
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #P23-03
A RESOLUTION BY THE MONROE COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE MONROE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE
REQUEST FILED BY THE MONROE COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT TO AMEND THE MONROE COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING SEC. 9.5-252.
(c)(3) h. AIRPORT DISTRICT (AD). AND THE ADDITION OF SEC.
9.5-258. AICUZ OVERLAY.
WHEREAS, on February 15, 1977, the Department of the Navy approved
the Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Plan for the Naval Air
Station, Key West, Florida; and
WHEREAS, on July 5,1989, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 019-1989 that
added the Naval AICUZ requirements to the Monroe County Land Development
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public meeting on January 13,
2003, reviewed the proposed amendments and the following Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law:
1. The Commission finds that land use regulations within an Airport District
should be confined to on-airport development. Regulations that direct off-
airport development are more appropriately located in an independent overlay
section of the Code.
2. The Commission finds that the proposed changes are consistent
with Section 9.S-S11(d)(S) b. (iv) New Issues and (v) Recognition
of a need for additional detail or comprehensiveness.
3. The Commission finds that the proposed changes are consistent
with the goals of the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive
Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the findings of fact and conclusions of law
support their decision to recommend APPROVAL to the Monroe County
Planning Commission of the following amendments to the text of the Monroe
County Land Development Regulations as requested by the Monroe County
Planning Department. .
Page 1 of 5
H:\Planning\Working Folders\Gross-Fred\AICUZ\PC Reso.doc
PROPOSED TEXT:
Sec. 9.5-252. Airport District (AD)
(a) These districts provide classifications of property for existing
or future airports and regulate uses within the boundaries of public
and private airports, and uses around, adjacent, and in the approach
zones of public and private, ~nd milit~r)' airports in order to: ...........
Sec.9.5-252.(c)(3)
h. Restrict/ons for miJitary airports: Priv~tel'( owned
property ~dj~cent to the N~v~1 Air St~tion, Boca
Chic~, ~Iso known ~s NAS Key West, ::;h~11 be
developed in ~ccord~nce with the m~p prep~red by
the U.S. N~v'{ knO'Nn ~s figure A or ~s upd~ted by
the U.S. N~vy. This m~p '^,~s prep~red in conjunction
'Nith the United State::; N~vy's Air Install~tion
Comp~tible U::;e Zone Study (AICUZ). A true copy of
figure A is ~tt~ched hereto ~nd m~de ~ part of this
subsection.
(i) The I~nd use objectives set forth in figure A
~nd the ~ccompanying I~nd use objectives
m~trix ::;et forth in figure B '::ere determined by
evalu~ting the ~irport oper~tion::; ~t NAS Key
'Nest, in terms of composite noi::;e r~ting (CNR)
zones ~nd ~ccident potenti~1 zones (APZ). A
copy of figure B is ~tt~ched hereto ~nd m~de a
part of this subsection.
(ii) The I~nd u::;e objective ::;hO'.vn in figure A ~nd
figure B shall be u::;ed in determining the
~lIo'.,v~ble I~nd uses for the v~riou::; AICUZ.
Each I~nd use c~tegory ':i~S e\'~lu~ted in terms
of comp~tibility for e~ch land use in terms of
density of popul~tion, density of structures,
explosion h~z~rds, ~ir pollution height
obstruction::;, ~ccident potenti~1 zone::;, ~nd
composite noise r~ting zones. The ev~lu~tion
resulted in r~tings of:
1. No ne'.\' development;
2. Restricted new development; ~nd
3. No restrictions.
Page 2 of 5
(iii) L~nd use c~tegories 'Nere r~ted ~s "restricted
new development" if ~ny ~ctivity or ~ctivities
i'"Jithin the category were c1~ssified ~s
incomp~tible. The 'J~rious AICUZ ~re coded ~s
follo'....s:
1. Accident potenti~1 zone A (APZ A), the
most critic~1 ~ccident potenti~1 zone;
2. B3: Accident potenti~1 zone B (APZ B),
the ~re~ 'Nhich h~s ~n identifi~ble
~ccident potenti~1 but less th~n APZ A;
3, B2: Accident potenti~1 zone C (APZ C),
the ~re~ iNhich is less critic~1 th~n APZ C
but still m~'l posse::;::; potenti~1 for
~ccidents; high noise imp~ct, CNR zone
3-;-
,
4, C2: Accident potenti~1 zone C, moder~te
noise imp~ct, CNR zone 2;
S. C1: Accident potenti~1 zone C, low noise
imp~ct, CNR zone 1;
6. 3: High noise imp~ct, CNR zone 3;
7. 2: No ~ccident potenti~1 zone, moder~te
noise imp~ct, CNR zone 2.
Sec. 9.5-258. AICUZ OVERLAY
(a) This district provides classifications of property for existing or
future military airports and regulates uses around, adjacent, and in
the approach zones of military airports in order to:
(1) Establish the control of obstructions and construction of
structures affectinq navigable airspace in accordance with
criteria delineated in volume XI, part 77 in federal aviation
regulations, Florida Department of Transportation
regulations, and this section; and
(2) Protect military airports against encroachment, to
implement appropriate noise abatement strateqies, and to
regulate development and reduce public exposure of
community activities, which are not compatible with
military airport operations.
Page 3 of 5
a. Restrictions for military airports: Privately owned
property adjacent to the Naval Air Station, Boca
Chica, also known as NAS Key West, shall be
developed in accordance with the map prepared by
the U.S. Navy known as figure A or as updated by
the U.S. Navy. This map was prepared in conjunction
with the United States Navy's Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone Study (AICUZ). A true COPy of
figure A is attached hereto and made a part of this
subsection.
1. The land use objectives set forth in figure A and
the accompanving land use objectives matrix set
forth in figure B were determined by evaluating
the airport operations at NAS Key West, in terms
of composite noise ratinq (CNR) zones and
accident potential zones (APZ). A COpy of figure B
is attached hereto and made a part of this
subsection.
2. The land use objective shown in figure A and
figure B shall be used in determining the
allowable land uses for the various AICUZ. Each
land use category was evaluated in terms of
compatibility for each land use in terms of
density of population, density of structures,
explosion hazards, air pollution height
obstructions, accident potential zones, and
composite noise rating zones. The evaluation
resulted in ratings of:
i. No new development: and
ii. Restricted new development: and
iii. No restrictions.
3. Land use categories were rated as "restricted new
development" if any activity or activities within
the category were classified as incompatible. The
various AICUZ are coded as follows:
i. A: Accident potential zone A (APZ-A), the
most critical accident potential zone: and
ii. B3: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B),
the area which has an identifiable
accident potential but less than APZ-A,
Page 4 of 5
high noise impact, CNR zone 3; and
Hi. B2: Accident potential zone B (APZ-B)
the area has an identifiable accident
potential but less than APZ-A, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2: and
iv. C3: Accident potential zone C (APZ-C),
the area which is less critical than APZ-B
but still may possess potential for
accidents: high noise impact, CNR zone
3: and
v. C2: Accident potential zone C, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2: and
vi. C1: Accident potential zone C, low noise
impact, CNR zone 1: and
vii. 3: No accident potential zone: high noise
impact, CNR zone 3: and
viii. 2: No accident potential zone, moderate
noise impact, CNR zone 2.
I Underlined text is new. Strikethrough text is deleted
PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Plannin~ Commission of Monroe County,
Florida at a regular meeting held on the gt day of April, 2003.
David C. Ritz, Chair
Denise Werling, Vice Chair
Jerry Coleman, Commissioner
Jiulio Margalli, Commissioner
. Alicia Putney, Commissioner
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
PLANNING COMMISSION OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
David C. Ritz, Chair
Signed this
day of
,2003.
Page 5 of 5