Loading...
Item T1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Agenda Item Summary Meeting Date 2/18/04 Division County Attorney AGENDA ITEM WORDING Presentation of settlement agreement with State to resolve allegations that the County ambulance service improperly billed Medicaid for services rendered. ITEM BACKGROUND This item was added on due to the deadlines imposed in the matter. That deadline first came to the attention of the County Attorney's office after the agenda deadline had passed. On February 2, 2004, the Attorney General's office dusted off a 3-4 year old dispute with the County over the appropriate billing rates for ambulance services. The dispute centers on whether the services provide fall within the definition of advanced life support (ALS) or basic life support (BLS). The AG's office has advised that it will settle the disputed amount for $6,630.34. That sum represents the alleged amount in dispute of $4,811.68 plus the AG's investigative costs of $1,818.66. The deadline for accepting that figure was extended from February 13 until February 23, 2004 to give the Board an opportunity to consider the proposal. The statute of limitations for filing the action is approaching, hence the deadline. Any settlement agreement would not include an admission of wrongdoing or fault on the part of the County. The amount claimed by Medicaid was previously disputed by County personnel in a detailed letter dated February 26, 2002, which set forth the County's position. That letter was left unanswered by the AG's office for close to two years. The AG is basing its position on a vague, 3 year old opinion from a physician who opined that some of the services provided were billed for incorrectly. If no settlement is reached, the AG's office has advised that it may file criminal Medicaid fraud charges or a civil action under the False Claims Act against an unspecified defendant. Both avenues are problematic for the AG because the criminal statute has recently been declared unconstitutional and the County enjoys statutory immunity from a Florida False Claims Act claim. Nevertheless, there may be other state or federal claims that could be brought against the County. The AG's office has advised that it would file any action in Leon County, since that is where the billing was submitted, in an effort to deprive any defendant of any home field advantage. Litigating this dispute could very well exceed the amount sought in the AG's settlement offer. PREVIOUS RELEVANT DOCC ACTION none CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TOTAL COST $6,630.34 BUDGETED Yes Noxx 1~\ COST TO COUNTY $6,630.34 SOURCE OF FUNDS APPROVED BY: County Attorney _ OMS/Purchasing! Risk Management! DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL: JOHN R. COLLINS DOCUMENTATION: Included ! To Follow! Not Required! AGENDA ITEM # t -- IN THE CmCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA SHARK KEY DEVELOPMENT CORP., and SUSAN THOMMES Petitioners, CASE NO. 2004-CA-OOOlSl-K JUDGE RICHARD G. PAYNE vs. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA a subdivision of the State of Florida, and JAMES ROBERTS as County Administrator of Monroe County, Florida. Respondents. ::i;t~L~J<~:)"" D~ I JOINT MOTION FOR AGREED WRIT OF MANDAMUS The Petitioners, SHARK KEY DEVELOPMENT CORP., and SUSAN THOMMES, and the Respondents, MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA and JAMES ROBERTS, as County Administrator of Monroe County, Florida, by and through undersigned counsels, file this Joint Motion and hereby agree as follows: 1. MONROE COUNTY shall review all Building Permit Applications for lots situated on Shark Key under the bulk regulations development standards as set forth in the Shark Key Planned Unit DevelopmentlMajor Development approvals by Monroe County. 2. The Building Permit issued to SUSAN THOMMES for Lot 15, Block 3 shall be amended by MONROE COUNTY to provide for a 20 I shoreline set back as defined in the Shark Key Planned Unit DevelopmentlMajor Development approvals. 1 / 3. Each party shall bear said party's own attorney fees and costs in this matter. WHEREFORE, Petitioners and Respondents move this Honorable Court to enter an Agreed Writ of Mandamus in this cause which incorporates the agreements contained herein. Dared~ ilL- Michael Halpern, Esq. Florida Bar No. 0218960 MICHAEL HALPERN P.A. Counsel for Petitioners 209 Duval Street Key West, Florida 33040 Tel. (305) 296-5667 Fax (305) 294-9852 .. Dated o~\ \~ \ o~ ~~~ County Attorney Florida Bar No. 0250163 Attorney for Respondents P.O. Box 1026 Key West, Florida 33041 Phone (305) 292-3470 Fax (305) 292-3516 2