Item C21
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: 2/18/04
DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BULK ITEM: YES
DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of a grant from the Transportation Security Administration to provide enhanced
perimeter security at the Key West International Airport.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The project costs will be paid 100% by the grant from TSA.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION. None
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: New grant agreement
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
TOTAL COST: $195,400.00
COST TO AIRPORT: None
COST TO PFC: None
COST TO COUNTY: None
BUDGETED: Yes
SOURCE OF FUNDS: TSA
REVENUE PRODUCING: No
AMOUNlT PER /YEAR:
APPROVED BY: County Attorney X
OMB/Purchasing X Risk Management X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS APPROVAL
~
Peter J. Horton
DOCUMENTATION: Included V
To Follow
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM #
C2/
DISPOSITION:
/bev
APB
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONTRACT SUMMARY
Contract #
Contract with: Transportation Security Administration
Effective Date: 11/10/03
Expiration Date: 11/9/04
Contract Purpose/Description: Enhanced Perimeter Security
Contract Manager: Bevette Moore
(name)
# 5195
(Ext. )
Airports - Stop # 5
(Department/Courier Stop)
for BOCC meeting on: 2/18/04
Agenda Deadline: 2/3/04
CONTRACT COSTS
Total Dollar Value of Contract: $195,400.00
Budgeted? Pending grant approval
Grant: TSA - 100%
County Match: None
Current Year Portion: -189,000.00
Account Codes: Pending grant approval
Estimated Ongoing Costs: N/A
(not included in dollar value above)
ADDITIONAL COSTS
For: .
(eg. maintenanc~, utilities. janitorial, salaries, etc.)
CONTRACT REVIEW
Date In
Changes
Needed
Yes No
Reviewer
Date Out
Airports Director 2 I~~
Risk Management :2 /1-10<.(
O.M.B.lPurchasing F! 3: /i2!:/
County Attorney ~~_
) (~
) (,/}'
( ) (';')
( ) ( )
2JAJ.c4--
Comments:
~/ . lam Grumhaus
,--\/__'/." .'.' / ..; ,_.:,-:Ct., _' ,tJ ., '
/ l.~~.c"~ L,. ",' ....A_I. (_
--.", -
~a-h ~~;~~er
Rob Wolfe
? .
;;) /~/~
2J 3./0'::(
6L /:3 /01-1
-_-1-
COOPERA TlVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) hereby awards Cooperative Research
Agreement Number 2004-G-006 to:
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Key West, Florida
to pursue the research described in Proposal Number 03-P-0132, entitled:
The Use of Smart Video Surveillance to Provide Enhanced Perimeter Security at
Kev West International Airport ("grant" or "recipient") under the direction of the
Principal Investigator: Mr. Jerome Fain, telephone n~mber (305) 296-8099, for a
period of 12 months beginning the date of the signatllJre by the TSA designated
signatory authority below and ending 12 months later. The amount of this award
is $195.400.00. _
The TSA Project Lead for the Agreement is: Ms. Diane Wilson, TSL-200,
telephone number (609) 485-4509. The FAA grants analyst is Mrs. Barbara Fuller,
ACX-50, telephone number: (609) 485-4919.
Since the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently administering this award,
the FAA makes this Agreement in accordance with 49 USC, Section 44511 and subject
to the following terms and conditions, which are hereby incorporated into this grant:
a. the proposal submitted by the grantee, dated July 18, 2003;
b. the budget for the research as proposed by the grantee;
c. the FAA Research Grants Program Directiv~, FAA Order 9550.7A; (particular
attention should be given to Chapter 8, Section 5. "Intellectual property. or) This order is
located at http://www.tc.faa.gov/logistics/grants
d. NOTICE: In accordance with Section 306 (b) of Public Law 103-305, you
are advised, "It is the sense of Congress that any recipient of a grant under this title,
or under any amendment made by this title, should purchase, when available and cost-
effective, American made equipment and products when expending grant monies;"
e. all obligations and responsibilities imposed qy statute or regulation, or both,
on grant recipients, whether or not explicitly stated in PAA Order 9550.7A (Le., the
responsibility for compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations rests with the
grantee); (the full text of guidance on publication of technical papers and information
intellectual property is attached); and
f. the Aviation Research Grant General Condition 1; (See Page 5).
Securltv Publications:
1) All research results related to civil aviation security must be reviewed by the
Undersecretary of Transportation for Security, or his designee, prior to publication or
release to the general public. This includes such items as dissertations, theses,
archival and conference technical papers, technical reports, etc. The purpose of this
requirement is to determine if the results contain information that may assist terrorists in
undermining established security systems.
2) Information must be submitted to the Tecnnical Monitor, who then forwards
Information to the Undersecretary of Transportation for Security, or his designee,
through his or her respective appropriate management official.
3) Within 4 weeks of submission, a notice of:approval or declination for
publication or release, or a request for a revision will ,be provided by the Undersecretary
of Transportation for Security, or his designee, to the: Technical Monitor through his or
her respective service director.
KeyWest International Airport will be given a copy of a memorandum from
Michael A. Canavan, former FAA Associate Administrator for Civil Aviation Security,
dated May 18, 2001, which explains the protection of' Part 191, Sensitive Security
Information.
Public Release of Information - There shall be no pulplic release of information
concerning the requirements of grant awards/agreements, the applicant's work product,
and/or results to the Government. The Transportatio~ Security Administration,
Undersecretary of Transportation for Security or desi~nee, shall approve all requests for
information pertaining to this grant award. Authority is 49 U.S.C. Section 40119 as
amended by the Aviation and Transportation SecurityiAct, Pub. L. 107-71,
November 19, 2001 Section 101 (e).
It is understood that this Agreement may have substantial involvement between the
. participants.
- ..
The TSA reserves the right to witness tests at the facility, to monitor progress
and verify compliance with the requirements of the agrreement.
The recipient shall provide detailed information :on the analysis and decision
software of developed system(s).
The recipient shall follow industry-accepted standard testing methodologies and
statistical sampling and analysis in evaluating the system performance.
All deliverables shaH be delivered to the TSL Grant Monitor. Additional
distribution shall be provided on an as-needed basis.
3
Vendors shall provide maintenance and repair services for systems while under
the Agreement.
All reports shall be prepared in accordance with TSA format requirements. All
delivered reports shall not contain proprietary information or labeling.
All delivered reports, communications, etc., sfjJall be labeled with applicable
security warnings. All electronic versions of sensitive security information shall be
password protected. Transmission of sensitive secunity information via e-mail is
permissible, provided it is password protected. Classiified information shall not be
transmitted over non-secure channels.
All unclassified reports containing sensitive security information shall be labeled
on the front cover and each page with the following warning: _-
"WARNING: This document contains sensitive security information that is
controlled under the provisions of 49 CFR Part 1520. No part of this
document may be released without the writtenlpermission of the
Undersecretary of Transportation for Security, Washington, DC, 20590.
Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S.
Government agencies, public availability to be determined"
Funding Support FY- 2002 - $195,400.00
FY-02 APPROPRIATION AND FUNDS CERTIFICATION:
05X0508140-2004-1 C28AOPA29-2814EYW000-41 01 0 - $195,400.00
The grantee agrees to abide by all the terms and conditions set out in this award letter.
The grantee explicitly assures the FAA that it will com~ly with the Civil Rights Act of
1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, ~he Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the
. Age Discrimination Act of 1975, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, and Executive Order
11246, dealing with Equal Employment Opportunity..
In compliance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, "Audits of
Institutions of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit Institutions," FAA Research Grants
have been assigned Cataloq of Federal Domestic Assi~tance Number 20.108.
I
As a grant recipient you are responsible for providing, copy of all single audit reports
to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. After reviewing.the report, if deficiencies are found,
a copy will be forwarded to the Department of Transpo~ation Office of Inspector
General who will then forward a copy to the fAA. !
- .- .'~"""'-'.""".."OJ_ ...........-..... ....... ........ ......_ ._''oJ....'oJ___....~.~
rMuL:.
J / I
4
It is understood that a final report will be submitted to the technical monitor, with a copy
to the Grants ,Analyst, at the completion of the last phase of this project If for some
reason the project is terminated prior to its completion date, a final report will be
subm'tted at that time. Please submit in electronic portable document format (PDF)
either on disk or bye-mail to barbara.fuller(a>fM.cov and diane.wilson@faa.gov.
Please review the award to ensure that you concur with its conditions. If we do
not receive comments from you within 30 days from!the date of this award, we
will consider the conditions acceptable.
AWARDED BY:
~M*3
Signatu re/Date
Randal E. Null, Ph.D.
ASSistant Administrator
Chief Technical Officer
Transportation Security Administration
U.S Department of Homeland Secunty
5
RESEARCH GRANT AWARD
GENERAL CONDITION 1
PA YMENT PROCEDURES.
Advance Payments. Recipients may be paid in advance, only with prior approval of the
Grants Officer or their designee. Recipients must submit copies of: (1) written
procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and
disbursement by the recipient, and (2) financial management systems that meet the
standards for fund control and accountability as provided in Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) OMB-A-11 0, Subpart C, Financial and Program Management, Para 21.
Cash advances to a recipient organization shall be limited to the minimum amounts
needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate_ cash requirements
of the recipient organization in carrying out the purpqse of the approved project. The
timing and amount of cash advances. shall be as cloSe as is administratively fe.asible to
the actual disbursements by the recipient for direct ptoject costs and the proportionate
share of any allowable indirect costs. The attached addendum identifies the breakdown
of shared costs between the Government and the recipient.
Advances of Federal funds shall be deposited and m~intained in insured accounts
whenever possible. Recipients shall maintain advandes of Federal funds in interest
bearing accounts, unless (1), (2) or (3) apply.
1) The recipient receives less than $120,000 in Federal awards per year.
2) The best reasonably available interest bearing account would not be expected to
earn interest in excess of $250 per year on Federal cash balances.
3) The depository would require an average or mirimum balance so high that it
would not be feasible within the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources.
Workinq Capital Advance Payment. If a recipient cannot meet the criteria for advance
payments and if the Grants Officer has determined that reimbursement is not feasible
because the recipient lacks sufficient working capital, the Grants Officer may approve
payments on a working capital advance basis. Underithis procedure, the FAA shall
advance cash to the recipient to cover its estimated di~bursement needs for an initial
period generally geared to the recipient's disbursing cycle. Thereafter, the FAA shall
reimburse the recipient for its actual cash disbursemernts. This payment method shall
only be used for recipients who are willing to provide timely advances to their
subrecipients to meet the subrecipient's actu.al cash di~bursements.
6
Reimbursement Method. Reimbursement is the preferred method when the
requirements specified above cannot be met. Recipients shall be authorized to submit
requests for reimbursement at least monthly. When the reimbursement method is used,
FAA shall make payment within 30 days after receipt of the billing, unless the billing is
Improper.
Submission of Cash Transaction Reports..:. In addition, if funds are advanced in excess
of $10,000, the recipient shall submit an origina(anq one copy of OMB Form SF-272,
Federal Cash Transactions Report, to the FAA 15 days after the end of each calendar
quarter.
Reauest for Payment. Recipients shall be authorized to submit requests for advances
and reimbursements at least monthly when electronic fund transfers are not used.
Requests for Treasury Check advance payment shall be submitted on SF-270,
"Request for Advance or Reimbursement". This form is not to be used when Treasury
check advance payments are made to the recipient automatically through the use of a
predetermined payment schedule or if precluded by special Federal awarding agency
instructions for electronic funds transfer.
Payments will be made by check or electronic funds transfer. When payment is to be
made by check, the FAA will authorize the U.S. Treasury to make payment directly to
the recipient organization. When payment is to be made electronically, the funds will be
transferred between the U.S. Treasury and the participating financial institution through
the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network. However, an OMB Form SF-3881,
Payment Information Form, ACH Vendor Payment System, is required for processing by
the Accounting Branch, ACX-32. This form is available by contacting the Aviation
Research Grants Office at (609) 485-4424.
Further, please submit all financial documents to:
FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center
"ATTN: Accounting Branch, ACX-32
Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405
TSA Awards $7.8 Million In First-Round Grants To Eight Airports For Cutting-
Edge Technology
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - December 16, 2003
TSA Press Office: (571) 227-2829
David M. Stone, Acting Administrator for the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA), today announced that eight airports have been awarded $7.8 million in grants
for Airport Terminal Security Enhancements. The airports are T.F Green State
Airport, R.I.; Newark International Airport; Helena Regional Airport, Mont.; Boston
Logan International Airport; Pittsburgh International !Airport; Chicago Midway
Airport; Denver International Airport; and Key West International Airport, Fla. TSA
anticipates awarding additional grants in the next few weeks for a total of $17
million.
"These grants are designed for airports to work with industry to deploy the newest,
most advanced technology commercially available to enhance security to stay one
step ahead of those who wish to do us harm," Stone said.
"These programs will deploy various technologies, inc;:luding state-of-the-art video
surveillance for detection of intruders to the deployment of physical gates to prevent
a 'rogue' passenger from entering the gate area and perhaps getting on an aircraft,"
he said.
Airports awarded grants in the first round:
· Rhode Island Airport Corporation was awarded two grants for T.F. Green
State Airport (PVD). One, for $1.18 million, which will allow for the purchase
and installation of an advanced ground radar-based security display system
for detecting "rogue' persons or vehicles inside the airport perimeter. This
technology will be installed to enhance the new ASDE-X ground radar
deployed to prevent aircraft collisions on the g,round. This grant will help
determine if modifications to the existing ground radar system, which
addresses safety-related issues can be modified to also address security-
related issues.
· The second grant for T.F. Green is $1.2 million for the purchase and
deployment of a state-of-the-art video surveillance system for detecting and
tracking unauthorized persons and vehicles th~t may breach the perimeter of
the airport. The airport plans to use both systems cooperatively to track an
intruder.
· The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey was awarded $1.67 million for
Newark International Airport to purchase and deploy a state-of-the-art video
surveillance system for detecting and tracking ipersons and vehicles that
breach the airport perimeter. The surveillance, system will string together
images taken at various angles by different cameras to create a single picture
with an unrestricted view of the impacted ar'ea.
· Helena Regional Airport was awarded $1.2 million to purchase and deploy
intelligence sensors to detect intruders on airport property. This system will
evaluate whether one sensor would be capable of indicating to other nearby
sensors the direction an intruder is going. The grant will also finance a multi-
path secure communications system for notifying multiple jurisdictions to a
possible problem at the airport.
· The Massachusetts Port Authority was awarded $989,879 for Boston Logan
International Airport for a new network airport analysis tool to better manage
such things as resources, equipment and traffic flow. Information obtained
through this grant will help airports and TSA prepare for future threat level
changes and determine resource needs to provide for appropriate law
enforcement coverage.
· The Allegheny County Airport Authority was awarded 5600,453 for Pittsburgh
International Airport for the purchase and deployment of video technology to
monitor exit lanes. The grant will support integrating video technology into
an emergency command center, providing a bridge for security forces, local,
state and federal, as well as operations command. Also, the grant will assist
in upgrading wireless communications of law enforcement officers to better
respond to checkpoint incidents.
· The City of Chicago was awarded $533,016 for Chicago Midway Airport to
purchase and install a physical barrier system that can be deployed so that
the evacuation of an entire concourse may b~ avoided should an incident
occur at the checkpoint. Should a passenger fail to follow screener
instructions and leave the checkpoint prematurely, or decide to circumvent
the checkpoint by entering the terminal through an exit lane, physical barriers
(gates) can be deployed to prevent the individual from entering the
concourse, thus avoiding having to evacuate and re-screen an entire terminal.
Use of such a system will be dependent on airport layout, however, this grant
will provide a tool that many airports may be able to use.
· Denver International Airport was awarded $309,033 for an advanced video
surveillance system for fast retrieval of stored video images and more
advanced monitoring of the exit lane to quickliy detect and track indjviduals
entering a concourse illegally by circumventing the screening process.
· Key West International Airport was awarded $195,400 for a "smart" video
surveillance system to provide enhanced perimeter security for detecting and
tracking unknown persons and vehicles and to protect quarantined aircraft
and other airport equipment.
The funding for these grants to enhance airport terminal security was appropriated
to TSA as part of the 2002 Supplemental AppropriatiCDns Act (P.L. 107-206). To
receive grant money, airport authorities needed to establish that the proposed
equipment would have potential for retention and brOader deployment, and could be
evaluated between 12 and 18 months.
For more information regarding TSA, see the websiteat
,-
I
us. Department 0( l'onsponotlon
Federal AviatIon Administration
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSALS
TO THE
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Form Approved:
a.M.B. No 2120-0559
rJ
FOR CONSIDERATION BY FAA ORGANIZATION UNIT
I Indicate the most specific unit known i.e. program, division. etc.
Dept. of Homeland Security / Transportation Security
Administration
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) or
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
59-6000749
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE:
SOLICITATION NUMBER
Announcement for Funding of Grants (Cooperative
Agreements) to Airport Authorities for Pilot Projects, June
12,2003
SHOW PREVIOUS GRANT NUMBER IF THIS IS A
SUPPLEMENT TO AN EXISTING GRANT
IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER
FEDERAL AGENCY? YES_ NO~ IF YES. LIST
ACRONYM IS
INSTITUTION NAME (IF KNOWN)
Ke West International Air ort
ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION (INCLUDE ZIP CODE)
Not applicable
3491 South Roosevelt Blvd., Ke West, FL 33040
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
20th
COUNTY
Monroe
SUBMITTING ORGANIZATION
o ACADEMIC
INSTITUTION
o NON-PROFIT ORG xO FOR.PROFIT
ORG
o OTHER
BRANCH/CAMPUS/OTHER COMPONENT (Where work is performed, if different from above)
TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT The Use of Smart Video Surveillance to Provide Enhanced Perimeter Security at Key
West International Airport.
REQUESTED AMOUNT:
$195,400.00
PI/PO DEPARTMENT
Not applicable
PROPOSED DURATION
12 months
REQUESTED STARTING DATE
9/1/2003
PI/PO FAX NUMBER
PI/PO PHONE NUMBER
r
NAMES (TYPED)
SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
HIGHE T DEGREE &
YEAR
4o,//??1
SIGNATURE
PI/PO
Pgtgr j..fertsn
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PO
By sIgning and submitting this proposal. the authonzed official of the applicant institution is providing certili tion regarding federal debt status. debarment and suspension.
drug-free workplace. and lobbying activities
(If answering 'yes" to either, please provide explanation.)
YES
NO
I s the organization delinquent in any Federal debt?
Is the organization or its pnncipals presently debarred. suspended. proposed for debarment. declared ineli ible. or voluntary excluded from covered
transactions by any Federal department or agency?
~ ~A F '::rm 955~. 1 i ~ ':'.S5\ Suoerseaes Pre\ '.::us EJJtloi"
DATE
?-/t' -~3
AUTHORIZED INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
NAME/TITLE (TYPED) Director Jerome Fain J
, ~ v ~T..,r
lh~'
- -IJ--' V I V~ 'J
\/'JJLJ U ~
V 0 q- 48'5- LJS () 1
...~
SUMMARY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
Form Approved:
a.M.B. No 2120-0559
U.S-DepOrTmen! 0( )ansponOrlon
F.d.raI Avlallon Admlnll!raflon
Coverlnq Period from 7/2003 to TBD
ORGANIZATION
Ke'/ 'Nest Airoort - aCI effort
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bart Savage - aCI PI
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: ?1/PD. Co-Pi's. Faculty and other Senior Assoclales
IL'Sl eacn separately wolh title. A.6 Show number In brackets)
(SEE iNSTRUCTIONS eN RE'/ERSE BEFORE CCMPLETiNG;
FOR FAA USE ONL Y
PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (~IONTHS)
PROPOSED GRANTED
AWARD NO
FAA Funaed
Perscn-mos.
F unos
ReQuestea by
Proposer
F unos
Granted by FAA
(If Different)
CAL
ACAD
SUMR
~ T 2c~niCian
2. Er-g:,.,eerlng
3P~OieCt .~.lanagemen!
J Ins:allatlcn-CCT\/
5 inStallatlon.Heao
120hrs
80hrs
160hrs
57,800
5 5,200
514.400
510.500
51.300
5
5 I ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPL~NT A TION PAGE)
o. i : TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-5)
B OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1 ( ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
2 ( ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN. PROGRAMMER, HC)
3 ( I GRADUATE STUDENTS
"
· ( ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5 i I SECRETARIAL CLERICAL
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A'B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES. WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A'B.C)
D. PERMANENT EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING 55.000);
TOTAL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL 1 DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA AND U.S. POSSESSIONS
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
1 STIPENDS $
2. TRAVEL
3 SUBSISTENCE
4 OTHER
) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES Equipmenl = $12.940. Tax @6.5% = 841
2. PUBLlCATON COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
· COMPUTER (ADPE) SERVICES
5. SUBCONTRACTS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I INDIRECT COSTS (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
528.354
~I,PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE
DATE
FOR FAA USE ONLY
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
J TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H.')
"lST
- :=~c: ~i:"~>H: :.. SiG~;A7~~?E
DATE
INDIREC"7" :OST RATE '/ERIFICATION
i C..\TE: CHEc."'~EC _ .:7E ,:F ~ATE SHr:ET !NITiALS
~~ SUMMARY Form Approved:
u.s. Oeponmenr 0I1h:lnsponarlon PROPOSAL BUDGET a.M.B. No 2120-0559
Federal AvIation AdmInistration
(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE BEFORE COMPLETiNG) I
CoverinQ Period from 7/2003 to TSD FOR FAA USE ONLY I
ORGANIZA TION PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)
Kev West Airport - ObiectVideo VEW PROPOSED GRANTED
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR AWARD NO.
"..,...... ..........................
ObjectVideo PI - John Clark
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD. Co-Pf's. Faculty and other Senior Assoc'ales FAA Funded Funds Funes
(List eacn separately ",tn IItle. A.6 Show number In brackets) Person-mos. ReQuested by Granted by FAA
Proposer (If Different)
CAL ACAD SUMR
1 lnstai:auon 5 hrs $625 5
2 _ 51 te survey 168 hrs 56,800
3, Rule creation ana validation 92.8 hrs $6,580
4 Ene-user [rainIng 16 hrs $2.000
5 I i OTHERS IUST.II'JDIVIDUALL Y ON BUDGET EXPLANTATION PAGE)
~) rOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-5)
S OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1 ( i POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
2. ( I OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN. PROGRAMMER. ETC) I I
3. ( ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
J. ( ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5 ( ) SECRETARIAL CLERICAL
-,
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A+B) $16.005
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES. WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A+B+C) $16,005
D. PERMANENT EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING S5.000);
;'
TOTAL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT
O'
E. TRAVEL 1 DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA AND U.S. POSSESSIONS $ 9,988
2 FOREIGN .........
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
1. STIPENDS S
2. TRAVEL
3 SUBSISTENCE
4. OTHER
( ) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
, MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES. Software license = S56,OOO. OV Hardware = S10.200.laxes@6.5'1o = $4.303 570,503
2. PUBLlCATON COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER (ADPE) SERVICES
5. SUBCONTRACTS
6. OTHER. Software maIntenance = Sll.200. Shipping = $150 511,450
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I INDIRECT COSTS (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
;
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
J TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H+I) $107.846
/
17 $107,846 S
PI/PO TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE DATE FOR FAA USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERI FICA TION
INST REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE DATE DATE CHECKED I DATE OF RATE SHEET I INITIALS
- -.:..<:: -
....A I""c'rr: J.......0-2 (1.",5\ Sl..oerseoes PrevIous t:.dltlon
1.
I
I
!
~~
SUMMARY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
Form Approved:
a.M.B. No 2120-0559
U.s.Depanment oIltcnsponarlon
federal Avlallon Admlnllfl'a1lon
Coverin Period from 9/1/2003 to 9/1/2004
ORGANIZATION
Kev West International Air art
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR
~tEI I k5rt~1"I ,ii(Q;;!~ ~;II
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD. Co-Pl's. Faculty and otner Senror Associates
(List eacn seoarately w,tn tllle. A.6 Snow numoer In braCKelS)
(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE BEFORE COMPLETING, j
FOR FAA USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)
PROPOSED GRANTED
AWARD NO.
FAA FuMed
Person-mos.
Funos
Reouesteo by
Proposer
FundS
Granteo by FAA
(If Differenl)
CAL
ACAD
SUMR
ervisor
200 hrs
$20,000.00
$
1
2.
3.
4.
5. ( I OTHERS (lIS11"'DIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANTATION PAGE)
6. ( ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1.5)
B. OTHER PERSONNEl (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1 ( ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
2. ( ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN. PROGRAMMER. ETC)
3. ( ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( I UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
S ( ) SECRETARIAL CLERICAL
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A+B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES. WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A+B+C)
D. PERMANENT EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING 55.000);
TOTAL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL 1 DOMESTIC (tNCl. CANADA AND U.S. POSSESSIONS
2. FOREIGN
i'
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
1. STIPENDS S
2 TRAVEL
3 SUBSISTENCE
4 OTHER
( ) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBlICATON COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER (ADPE) SERVICES
5. SUBCONTRACTS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
DATE
/}-/P-1J3
S
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H+I)
FOR FAA USE ONLY
INST REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE
DATE
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
DATE CHECKED DATE OF RATE SHEET INITIALS
"'-AA ~~;r"., '::1550.2 ~ 1.1,:15) Suoerseces Pre'if()Us EdltJOn