2nd Change Order 08/05/2021 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe
The Florida Keys rON �aI , �z��,a,, 1m-or Pto FeinDavid Rice,District,4
Ni Craig Cates District I
;r Mdie Martin z.Distfict 3
Memorandum
DATE: J J2021
T OCC
cn=Kevin G.Wilson,P.E.,o=Monroe
County,FL(the Florida Keys,ou,
Kevin G. IIs�YI� P.E. d;.? .`' va� email=wilson-kevin@monroecounty-
fl.gov,c=u s
2021.08.03 20:02:57-04'00'
SUBJECT: Proposed Change Order to be Approved
Attached is proposed Change Order#2 for the Bimini Drive Bridge (004603) Replacement project.
This change order increases the final contract sum by $18,0 6.38. The substantial completion date is
unchanged.
Monroe County Ordinance 027-1998 and subsequent amendments provide authority for the
Administrator to approve change orders within specified limits slier providing Board of County
Commissioners with at lust 24 hours to review them and pose any questions or objections that they may
have.
It is the Administrator's intent to approve the attached change order under that authority on Thursday,
August 5, 2021.
CONTRACr CHANGE ORDER
PROJECT TITLE: Bimini Drive Bridge ( 904 03) Replacement Project CHANGE ORDER NO: 2
INITIATION ATE; 6128121
TO CONTRACTOR: meri n Empire Builders, Inc. CONTRACT DATE: 1210 /20
The Contract is changed as follows:
The original Contract Sum . ......... ......... .................... ......... . ..................... ...$3,190,000.00.
Net change by previously authorized Change Order ......... ..........$522,248.00.
The Contract Cum prior to this Change order was—,,........ ..... ......... ......................$3,712,248.00.
The Contract Sum is(increased) by this Change Order#2............. .....................................$18,046.38.
The Revised Contract Sum including this Change Order .... ............................................ $3,730,294.38.
Pursuant to contract article 7.2.2, the cost or credit to the owner resulting from a change in the Work shall be
determined in one or more of the following:
7.2.2.1 mutual acceptance of lump sum properly itemized and supported by sufficient substantiating data to permit
evaluation.
7.2.2.2 unit prices stated in the Contract Documents or subsequently agreed upon.
7.2.2.3 cost to be determined in a manner agreed upon by 'the parties and a mutually acceptable fixed or
percentage fee.
This change order is to add line item 0425-1910 for 2 closet flume inlets to the contract total. This line item was
included in the design and was not included in the bid documents.
The total cost for this change is$18,046.38 with no additional contract time.
Item Description Quantity QM Unit Cost Amount
0425-1910 inlets, Closet Flumes 2 EA $9 023.19 $18 046.3E
Total $1 , 4 .3
This Change Order is 691, 3f the i i contract rice.
CONTRACTOR
C to
ENGINEERING SERVICES DIRE. OR JU th Clarke, «,
e...� . �em.,vFl9os
Date
ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR zo „aoo-0aoo
Date
MAYOR
Date
/ MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY
( � APPR VO AS TO FO 4.
CHRISTINF LIMBERT�BARROWS
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
DATE. 8/9/21
Change Order Attachment per Ordinance No. 004-1999
• Change Order was not included in the original contract specifications. Yes ® No ❑
If Yes, explanation:
Additional bridge drainage structures was added to this contract.
• Change Order was included in the original specifications. Yes❑ No
If Yes, explanation of increase in price:
• Change Order exceeds$25,000 or 5% of contract price (whichever is greater). Yes ❑ No
If Yes, explanation as to why it is not subject for a calling for bids:
• Project engineer/architect approves the change order. Yes ® No ❑
• Change Order is correcting an error or omission in design document. Yes []No
Should a claim under the applicable professional liability policy be made? Yes ❑ No
Explain:
?� sit
111ysS s5A1>4 r+s� ti 1�
r
frt_4_,t
,tune 23,2021
r. Clark Briggs
Monroe Count37 Engineering
I100 Simonton St. Rin 216
Key West,Fl. 33040
Bimini Bridge Replacement Project
Subject: American Empire Builders,INC. 4I#4
Dear Mr. Briggs:
Enclosed is the American Empire Bridge INC east Proposal for additional closed flume inlets.. These inlets were part
of the design but were not included in the original bid documents. WSP has performed a cost analysis compared to
Area 14 statewide averages and find the cast submittal from AEB to be acceptable.
Therefore,I concur with the contractor's cost Proposal of$19,046,38 for to o inlets installed.
Sincerely,
PARSONS BRING KERHOFF
Keith Duke
Project Administrator
cc: Poinsi€Chakkaphak P.E.
(Enclosure)
AEB
l
1377 51V 1.45: C _SQI1 C.._B. M1AMI, F 331 6.
OFFICE: 305-261-9276 f FAX: 305-261-9210
May 20, 2021
County: MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
oJe t Name: BIAITNI DRIVE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Subject. Price Pro�.c�sal for Item 042. 191.. . Inlets.�.Closet Flumes
Please see below American Empire Builders, lrrc. price proposal to fti islr and install two inlets as per
drainag(e detail shown in the project's roadway final plans street No, 9,
i k
Item
No D,escription Unit Quantity (Joit Price Amoupt
0425-
1910 hilets, Closet Humes EA �_ 2 9,02.3,19 18,046,38
Sincerely,
-rtr_xnic, lSvl. Go alez. '' 'resident
American Empire 13rl lders, Inc,
I Inlet,Closed Flume-Unit Cost
CREW QUANTITY QUANTITY
Superintendent 1 Truck- Pickup 1
Foreman 1 Flatbed Truck 0
Carpenter Small Tools 1
Laborer 21crane 0
Operator 1 Excavator 1
i
Total Crew&Equipment $ 3,027,42
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION DAYS
Site Preparation 0.5
Precast Inlet-Installation 1
Total Days 1.5
TOTAL $ 4,541.13
Materials
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
n,ccast Inlet
Miscellaneous
$ 3,376.1.0
Subtotal Labor,Equipment,Material and Transport $ 7,917.23
Overhead&Profit $ 1,105.96
Total s 9,023.19
t,YSP USA k3E"SCRIF'"T''.ON OF EXTRA WORK
C I's ENGIIN R r ESTIMATE ,,l r ^rfpre<s s r. a cladc„c, IrI^c
Lz1d3Odt
1]5SC7KIM-fON BURDENED R,1TF' AC'..€7'�li[OiS ]<.31.FIfRs AC`i"CV73.4hAgd,^1".z` 17?I.E.A114C?UN"1` R:LdRPK.S
crinlendulY 35.00 47.11 -I.W 188.83
F ui mm1.21¢'at2° 25-00 33.71 4,00 - 134,98
kallecf Lab-r 20 LQ 26 m 16.00 431-62
'anti-ski€fcc9.LA.,, 15.00 2033'.. - -
t7nsI:�9lydlat- 10.00 13.55 K00 - 108,41
U"'i"A0 I't- IQ,110 u,.55
SUBTOTAL LABOR S 1,181.45 S
EQUIPMENT
I(EPv"I.hL 0:PEIL C€)S'T °d'OT AL. 1DLE r1C1'1VL HC➢11RS [1Dl.E ItCDGILS AL"TINE 1DLI:
DECI2.1P'.HON PTR FEOItR HOUR. PER HOUR PER HOLM REQ'D REQ'D AMOUNT AMOC11^f"1' It1 ktiA4tliS
71,T.; C IL93 1.67' 8,40 QT.
Bl ,t}26 ' L.F7car21nr 8.54 7,81 S633 4.17 8,00 1"-1i
------------
__.56.{1U
- - - - -----16.00
16.00
16.00 -
16.00
" . 16.O0
1.6.170 .,,..� ..m..�
I6.OD
16.OD
. 16,0€1
32,00
ST-9TOT,Al,EQUIPMENT 5 226.1E 8. -
5^LATGRI.ALS
1?E`u'CRIT'1'fO'V -L RA-M- QTY, Ai3OGTi1' _ REMARKS
CI-A i'l-h,lets ----- EA 6,814.50 100 ---- 13,629.60 U.it sate b c4 tin A,.14 Sr-i&A-Al
SUBTOTALMATERIALS S 13,629.50
SALES TAX @ 7,5wl$ L022,1-
.1 CT AL MATEMAL COST .5 14,651,82
stMCON 1'CEACT
UlSCLiddrL"IL3N =1 uml lu I'E JACTIVE O'TY. -MLE.QTY. ACr flIE AM LWT UE13t11JI.TC 121_Millilti5 -_--
L8
Hli
FIR
TOTAL.SUBCQN`TR..A(T $ - S
EQUIPMENT
RCNTAL -'11.COST TOTAL AMOUNT
DECRI 11 RQ TOTAL REMARKS
$UBTQTAL ECUIFM ENT S -
(77' F:1i COST'
bL5 A f1OIv .-..UNIT lu I'E
TOTAL OTHFR COST__.. _
At ITVE
SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL WORK' COST CDLE COST AC`TIVE),f Al2SCC1-f' IDLE MARKUP TOTAL
LABOR I7.5% S P,187.45 3 - 5 207.80 NA S 1,3g5.23
LQULPkLrNT @ 17.556 22.6.16 - 8 19.58 S - S 265 74
kf.A'TE[ ALS @l 17.5% 14.651.Al 5 2,5&1.07 _ 17 215.89
SURCOEIRA N['T @ 10. - - A. S
P!1Y LTE.MS - - S -
CONTRACT BOND @ 0.71% S
SUB t'(YFAI,AMOUNT FOR EXTRA WORK
I(TkL A"vl(}LiSV7 FS7R GYL'32:k WOR
a tlic lirxt SSd7,�U.(Yl LffW.•�b sr€U 536 Uiece4firr
YrePa�.exl Ci,^� D7te;
_.-
Pup_...-..d,�,....._..
raj
LJ
Y
LLJ
LA
GJ CxmLIJ
_- < .
m_
- €!J
6ce, _
jca, l v n 5
v3 Ln
J tS
id uJ LU
L cr1 Li uj U
u < C7 Luo o w
m tJ LU� z
:a TM
C i. �,llJ f
ILI
w 0rm o _ U Q 0
j- ON _< _ r.l4 uj Im Q 0 ttt u u u u c4 In 8 C2
ty�
VD
fu
rd
v` ✓t 5 v't ..J l..J v°i U Ce.a L� .t 1
Ln " >
ou a _-
fu5 'f;:3 Sip 0 C) C2 CD CD n C.� C2 C) C:J m C, (? C) CD m
--' Lq C� 12: C, C� '!, 1`-. 7 C7 CS C� C� C:� C? 6"? C: C7 C
ED oo •�-- m r-d Cad ,-- rJ e•-1 r >°- •
rn
G eek C 3
rZ
� C: Cb EL7 6a`5 Cal Cnk C7 C Cn•`.? C2 C3 6 C`3 Cd
r'•rt " " C� C-r rat C� C! C� C� C� C� C� C� & M
aµ In c d " ems'? •° W CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4" t-- In
fn m L i m 0 m 0 C� N 0 a, m �-
m tip CD -t 0 S°! 1, 't o C"
)_
t`d C/y -V7- il?- e"k 4"*1 In €, } ,.C'} f�5 V1 U- R.F4, .6/1, i.F?
r,
-_ - i i CO In €n ski ,`3 -+. c' CJ C"a r t't C CY,
- llq r- cl3 ® r'1 `1: 00 CJ C' •Ca r, C* ¢s b
14 G.:S - � U-1 m cw* Ca m C� Car 6s°3.
!, Cr: to r� C*.} C!5 caa 3 C,7 0 "{9' 0, � t11 td; C1x vCb
L.ft In 6n ate- — 4°®5 C t i In 0 01 Co m
i✓T dlT tC1-
4
�f T tip
e p64t _
— — req
- �-d to rr-A rn rv'u '
r '.' '" "''
k•'- C5 C LA7 :3 r Ce.'3 C"J CS C> al
- _- `