Item C17
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: September 15, 2004
Division: Public Safety
Bulk Item: Yes X
No
Department: Emergency Management
AGENDA ITEM "VORDING: Approval to waive purchasing policies and procedures and enter into a
Purchase Service Order (PSO) with RC Quinn Consulting, Inc., to provide a revised Local Mitigation Strategy
Plan (UvIS), in the total amount not to exceed $26,667.00
ITEM BACKGROUND: The Department of Community Affairs has obligated Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program funds in the amount of $20,000, to assist in the revision of Monroe County's Local Mitigation Strategy
(LMS) Plan. Due to staff limitations, it is our intent to have the document prepared by an outside consultant. In
order to meet the specified time frames for the deliverables outlined in the grant agreement, we are requesting
Board's approval to waive the purchasing policies and procedures concerning the competitive bid process. In
anticipation of that, written price quotes were solicited for the requisite scope of work. Three quotes were
receIved as follows: RC Quinn Consulting, Inc., not to exceed $26,600.00; ERI International, Inc., $29.500.00;
Industry and Environmental Engineers, not to exceed $29,750.00. We request approval to enter into a PSO with
RC Quinn Consulting 111 an amount not to exceed $26,667.00.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On August 18,2004, Board approved Federally Funded
Subf,'Tant Agreement with Florida Department of Community Affairs for the revision of the County's Local
Mitigation Strategy (LMS) document.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
TOTAL COST: $26,667.00
FEDERAL MATCH: $20,000.00
LOCAL MATCH: $6,667.00
BUDGETED: Yes No X
Ad Valorem -
SOURCE OF FUNDS: General Revenue Fund Reserves
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes
No...2l AMOUNT PER MONTH_ Year
APPROVED BY:
County Atty N/ A
OMB;Ytr'asing
i /
fA . RisJ<: Management N/A.,
/~ -- .~:f/ /~ <.y'
i/3104-
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ~ ~-- "Reggie".paros --
~~
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
To Follow
Not Required
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM #
(2/1
08/30/2004 15:05 FAX 410 2~- 5977
RCQulnn Cons1 tng
@01l01
RCC4!INN
CONSULTING, INC.
\ B Prince ~ SL '2 . A.oJlaJXI~ MD 21401-172\
410..l67.6968 · f~ 110.167 .5~77
l"CXl...iMC~ct
~q~onnliri~(om
August 30, 2004
Thomas 1. Stufano
Monroe County Office of Emergency Management
Monroe County, Florida
RE' Revision and Update of the Local Mitigation Strategy
Dear Mr Smilino.
I have reviewed the Scope of Work from the Department of Community Affairs' grant
awarded to Monroe County to revise and update the Local Mitigation Strategy to comply
with the latest regulations issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for
hazard mitigation planning (referred to as Section 322)_
Please note that I have been advised by DCA that the hazard identification and risk
assessment contained in the existing LMS is acceptable, thus work does not require new
analyses of that narure Further, as you are aware, the mitigation planning requirements
are heavily focused on the planning process, therefore, the active involvement if your
LMS members is required for successful completion of the work.. Members may be
asked to attend meetings, provide input, re','lew drafts and participate in decisions
I am pleased to accept the opportunity to work with your office and other LMS members
to undertake the work outlined in the Scope of Work for an amount not to exceed Twenty
Six Thousand, Six Hundred Dollars ($26,600,00).
Sincerely,
Rebecca C Quinn, CFM
President
MITIGATION · NFIP · CODES · PLANNING
RCOQINN
CONSULTING. INC
Rebecca C. Quinn, CFM
Hazard Mitigation and Floodplain Management Specialist
Contact Information:
Rebecca C. Quinn, CFM
RCQuinn Consulting, Inc.
153 Prince George St. #2
Annapolis, MD 21401-1721
\\iv.."W'. rcquinn consul ting .com
Phone: (410) 267-6968
FAX: (410) 267-5977
rcquinn@earthlink.net
MBE certified by Maryland
DOT: #01-159
Ms. Quinn, a nationally Certified Floodplain Manager, has more
than 24 years of experience in all phases of hazard mitigation and
floodplain management. Her background includes 10 years as the
Maryland State Hazard Mitigation Officer dealing with floods,
hurricanes, severe winter storms and forest and wildfires. Ms.
Quinn's hazard mitigation experience spans federal, state and local
programs ranging from hazard identification, mitigation planning
alternatives analyses, project selection, environmental reviews and
permit requirements.
As Maryland's State Coordinator of the National Flood Insurance
Program, she was responsible for administration of flood mitigation
grant programs, CRS assistance, and oversight of local flood
management programs.
SELECTED PERTINENT EXPERIENCE - MITIGATION & PLANNING
Local Hazard Mitigation Planning: City of Augusta, GA; Jefferson Drainage District #6,
TX; Prince George's County, MD; Travis County, TX; PearIand, TX; Kent County, DE; City
of Rocky Mount, NC; City of Florence, SC; Caddo Parish, LA; Town of Grundy, VA. Hazard
Mitigation Planning Sperialist and/ or Technical Advisor: Lead communities through the planning process
designed to produce a plan that meets the requirements of federal programs that provide financial
assistance for mitigation projects (HMGP, FMA) and insurance discounts (NFIP/CRS). The plans
identify hazards and risks, evaluate current programs and policies, formulate mitigation goals and
future actions, and involve the public in setting priorities. Current NFIP floodplain management
regulations and subdivision ordinances are critiqued and option: for increasing credits under the
Community Rating System are recommended.
FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program Repetitive Loss Action Plan; Mitigation Specialist:
Provided technical writing, coordination and organizational assistance, and advice to FEMA to
document the repetitive loss problem and the agency's decisions regarding programmatic and
actions to pursue to reduce the impact of repetitive insurance claims on the National Flood
Insurance Program auly 2004, final draft).
State Hazard Mitigation Plan (Section 409), Virginia Department of Emergency
Management; Project Manager and HMGP Planner. Lead the development of a multi-hazard,
interagency hazard mitigation plan, including research into the frequency and magnitude of hazards
and impacts on exposed people and property. Researched existing statutory authority of pertinent
agencies; facilitated identification and prioritization of mitigation actions. Subcontractor.
Plan Review: Flood Mitigation Assistance Plans, South Carolina Department of Natural
Resources; Mitigation Planner: Reviewed draft plan for consistency with federal planning guidelines;
prepared comments to guide revisions to achieve in acceptable plan.
- I -
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Guidance Documents, Florida Department of
Community Mfairs; Project Manager: Developed two detailed, hands-on guidance documents: One
to help local jurisdictions develop floodplain acquisition and elevation projects with specific focus
on policies and unusual situations pertinent to implementation; the other to help applicants
complete documentation to apply for grants to support a wide variety of mitigation projects,
including floodproofing retrofits of water and wastewa ter treatment plants
Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Report (1997), Federal Emergency
Management Agency; Task Manager: Managed final preparation and technical editing of the
report, prepared to fulfill an objective set forth in FEMA's National I'v1itigation Strategy. Baker
researched nineteen atmospheric, geologic, hydrologic, and seismic hazards. Concise descriptive
summaries were prepared for each natural hazard and selected technological hazards that may be
triggered by natural events. The report, supported by extensive graphics generated by GIS
technology, describes how hazards are identified and how risks are assessed.
Hazard Mitigation Policy, Planning and Projects, Maryland Department of Natural
Resources, Water Resources Administration; State Hazard Mitigation Officer: Prepared
components of Maryland's hazard mitigation plan and strategy, including forest and wildfire hazards
and floods. Conducted planning workshops and guided development of hazard mitigation plans by
nine counties. Identified, evaluated and prioritized damage reduction alternatives and allocated state
and local funding. Developed grant applications with State agency and local applicants. Initiated
Maryland's program to prepare digital floodplain mapping for every county and town. Developed
and led state hazard mitigation team, and conducted workshop. Analyzed statutes and regulations
pertinent to floodplains through interviews and document review, evaluated agency construction
requirements and formulated initiatives to reduce exposure of people and property. Prepared
inventory of State facilities subject to flooding; prepared inventory of flood-prone public schools;
developed floodproofing grant for a public school.
State Coordination of National Flood Insurance Program, Maryland Department of Natural
Resources, Water Resources Administration; State Coordinator: Directed State's evaluation of
local floodplain management programs designed to fulfill requirements of the National Flood
Insurance Program. Worked with local jurisdictions to evaluate eligibility under the NFIP's
Community Rating System, to prepare CRS applications, and to address program deficiencies.
Resolved conflicts in policies, made recommendations on complex permit and variance actions, and
advised development community and private property owners on floodplain rranagement. Managed
development of technical workshops for community officials.
Awards
Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc. Awarded the Association's highest honor in
June 2000, the Goddard-White A ward, established to recognize the contributions to floodplain
management made by Gilbert White and Jim Goddard. The award is given to individuals who are
highly instrumental in carrying forward the goals and objectives of floodplain management
throughout the nation.
Education
Doctoral Studies
Johns Hopkins University
M.S.E., 1982
Environmental Engineering
Johns Hopkins University
B.A.,1974
Environmental Science
University of Virginia
.2.
88/29/2884 21:25
._m".._..... __._
358-4938'34'3
ERI INTERNATIONAL
PAGE Bl
ERllnternational. Inc.
4537 FoxIlll1l Drive N.It.
Olympia. WA M510
IDt...Net JIoma pace Ad4r...: bttp:II_..rt-lDtl.colD
~1IaiJ AdAIre..: lAID.....-laU.oom
PhGDe: (980) 491-7785
Faz: (300) 4gS-0949
TO: TOM CULLEN
REP Coordioato.r
L Description
ERJ will assist Monroe County in the revision of the County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
as stated in "Attachment B, Scope of Work" that we received by fax.
Besides compiling with the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of2000, the purpose of a LMS is to
develop a unified approach among the community for dealing with identified hazards and hazard
management problems. The LMS serves as the tool to direct the community's ongoing effons to
reduce vuJnerability to the impacts produced by both the natural and man-made hazards. The
LMS will also help establish funding priorities for currently proposed mitigation projects and
develop priority mitigation projects to be completed with such mitigation assistance funds as
may be made available.
The implementation of mitigation programs is a k.ey component to achieving a "sustainable
community," one in which people, businesses, and institutions are protected from the
disruptions and impacts of emergencies and disasters, Hazard mitigation plaJUling must be
closely coordinated with a community's overall planning and development efforts intended to
provide its citizens a safe, healthy and prosperous place to live and work.
n. ERl Experience.
We have over 10 years experience performing hazard vulnerability assessments (HV As) and
writing mitigation plans (aka LMS). Recently we have written mitigation plans for Jefferson
County, Alabama and Yakima County, Washington.
Ad?itionally, we are very familiar with Monroe County. During the first quarter of 2004, we
a~slsted Monroe county with the development of "Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP)" for
SIX key de,Partments as mandat~d by the state. COOP is an effort within individual departments
and Bgencles to ensure the contmued perfonnance of minimum essential functions during a wide
range of potential emergencies.
m. Cost
ERI will perform the scope of work for $29,500.00.
Submitted by Patrick "Rick" LaVa.1la, President, ERl Interoational
Message
Page 1 of 1
Devane-Stacy
From: Toner.lrene
Sent: Tuesday, August 31,2004 1 :50 PM
To: Devane-Stacy
Cc: Stufano-Tom
Subject: FW: Revised local Mitigation Strategy (lMS) Proposal
lMS Bid Proposal from Jim Brush
-----Original Messagem.-
From: James R. Brush [mailto:jimmyrb@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 20048:27 PM
To: toner-irene@monroecounty-fl.gov
Subject: Revised local Mitigation Strategy elMS) Proposal
Irene,
Here is my proposal to you. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to work on this project.
The original signed version is in the mail to you.
Thanks,
Jim
8/31/2004
Professional Services Work Order
Prime Consultant: Industry and Environment Engineers
Emergency Management-Momoe County, FL
August 28, 2004
PROFESSIONAL SERVIC ES WORK ORDER
This agreement entered into ,2004 between the Project Prime Consultant,
Industry and Environment Engineers, 103650 Overseas Hwy., Key Largo, FL, 33037
(hereinafter called the Engineer), and the Client, Monroe County Florida- Emergency
Management 490 63rd Street, Marathon, Florida 33050: for services in connection with the
following project: Revised Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS). The Client's and Engineer's
rights, duties, and obligations hereunder will be performed in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Agreement for Professional Services between Client and Engineer dated July
28,2003, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of Project: The Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) is a plan that seeks to reduce or
eliminate, where possible, damage due to storms or other disaster events before they
occur. The primary mechanism in the development and implementation of the Local
Mitigation Strategy is the Local Mitigation Strategy Committee. The LMS Committee is
made up of various county, state, and municipal officials, as well as representatives from
concerned private and non-profit agencies. Working together to represent all interests in
the community, the LMS Committee identifies potential mitigation projects, such as
retrofitting existing buildings so they may be used as hurricane shelters, prioritizes such
projects, and, together with officials from the State Department of Community Affairs,
oversees their completion.
First-Deliverable (October 1, 2004; Suitable for submission to DCA)
Provide documentation that the public will be given an opportunity to comment on the existing Plan
and for any proposed changes, at three (3) public meetings: I) Upper Keys 2) Middle Keys 3)
Lower Keys (Key West). All applicable jurisdictions will be invited to the meetings: Municipalities,
utilities, government agencies, mobile-home owners associations, and the public utilizing Monroe
County emergency management website, local radio spots inviting the public to attend the
meetings, newspaper notices, door-to-door-Ietters inviting comment via e-mail .CD.s of the plan
and revisions available at local county libraries; Example copies will be provided.
Prepare examples of letters, public service annour::~ements, radio spots; review existing Emergency
Management media public involvement procedures, that are currently used and present proposed
modifications, announcing the public meetings. Provide a list ofthe local jurisdictions documents to
be reviewed and to be incorporated into the revised plan. This list will include FMA and CRS plans.
Describe and summarize in a written narrative form, the planning process, who will be involved,
and how the public will become involved.
Second-Deliverable (By the due date)
Describe the type of all natural disasters, location, extent, past events, probabilities of future events,
vulnerabilities to each identified hazard, impact on the identified community, future buildings,
potential human and economic impacts, dollar losses, methodologies used, land uses, development
trends; as per DCA requirements.
Assess the risks of each jurisdiction for the entire planning area for each identified hazard and
prepare a summarizing report suitable for DCA submittal.
Page 10f3
Professional Services Work Order
Prime Consultant: Industry and Environment Engineers
Third-Deliverable (By the due date)
Describe the mitigation strategy, goals, an action plan, individual action items, methods for
monitoring, evaluating, updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle, the process of local
jurisdiction incorporation of the plan, how the community will continue public participation, long-
term vulnerabilities, specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects
of each hazard identified.
Emergency Management-Monroe County, FL
August 28, 2004
Prepare a report summarizing the findings and conclusions suitable for DCA submittal.
Fourth-Deliverable (By the due date)
Anange and coordinate one (1) public meeting after the completion of the draft of the revised Plan
and prior to it's submittal to and approval by DCA. Provide documentation to DCA that such a
meeting has taken place. Before the meeting has taken place, the public will be notified using
common media procedures such as public service announcements, radio spots; review existing
Emergency Management media public involvement procedures, that are cunently used and present
proposed modifications, announcing the public meetings,. For those individuals that do not attend
the meeting for all legal addresses in Monroe County, the letter that has been mailed to them, will
invite them to submit their comments via e-mail or by US Mail in a self-addressed postage paid
envelope.
Prepare the final revised Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Document for FEMA review and
approval.
Client Provided Activities and Information:
Enactment of resolutions required by DCA for jurisdictions, such as the Monroe County Board of
County Commissioners, Key Colony, Islamorada, Marathon, etc., to legally implement the Revised
LMS are the responsibility of Monroe County Emergency Management officials and for each
individual jurisdiction.
Monroe County Emergency Management personnel will walk through the required signatures,
make the public presentations, and be responsible for executing the required DCA documents.
Meetings conducted will be by MCEM. MSEM will provide a digital file of the existing plan.
n. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Any services not specifically provided for under Section I above shall be considered
Additional Services, Including:
Field survey of undocumented conditions.
Value engineering studies, or review of studies prepared by others.
Any extenuating circumstances that require the engineer to respond.
III. ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION
In consideration for Engineer providing the services noted above, the Client agrees to
compensate the Engineer as follows:
First-Deliverable: fee will be the lump sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred ($2,500.00)
Dollars for the services described, excluding reimbursable expenses and additional
servIces.
Second-Deliverable: fee for this project will be the lump sum of Seven Thousand Five
Hundred ($7,500.00) Dollars for the services described, excluding reimbursable expenses
and additional services.
Page 2 of3
Professional Services Work Order Emergency Management-Monroe County, FL
Prime Consultant: Industry and Environment Engineers August 28, 2004
Third-Deliverable: fee will be the lump sum ofTen Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollars for
the services described, excluding reimbursable expenses and additional services.
Fourth-Deliverable: fee will be the lump sum of Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty
($9,750.00) Dollars for the services described, excluding reimbursable expenses and
additional services.
Total Not-to-Exceed Fee
$29,750.00
Fee for Additional Services: In the event that additional services are required for work
outside the written scope of work, the following hourly billing rates shall be applied:
Principal
Project Engineer
Production personnel
$120.00 per hour
$100.00 per hour
$65.00 per hour
Reimbursable Expenses: Reimbursable expenses may consist of, copies, auto mileage
@ $0.29 per mile, specially requested CAD plots or reproduction, etc. Reimbursable
expenses will be billed at direct cost.
Invoicing: Fees and reimbursable expenses will be invoiced monthly. Basic fees will be
billed according to the percentage of work completed. Fees for additional services will
be billed hourly.
In witness thereof, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this agreement upon the
terms, conditions and provisions above stated.
Engineer
Client
Name: James R. Brush, PE
Industry and Environment
By
Title: President
Title
Date:
Date:
Vendor # 008951
Address: Monroe County Emergency
Management-
490 63rd Street
Marathon, FL 33050
Address:
103650 O/S Hwy. #46
Key Largo, FL 33037
Page 3 of3
Attach ment B
Scope of Work and Schedule of Payments
Purpose
The Recipient shall submit a revised Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) document for Monroe County, Florida,
(hereafter referred to as the "Plan") that is in compliance with the local hazard mitigation requirements of
Section 322 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K) as implemented in the Interim Final Rule (44CFR,
Part 201).
First-Deliverable
Timeframe: Due by July 31,2004.
Estimated Cost: $ 6,667.00
Federal Share: $ 5,000.00
Local Match: $ 1,667.00
By the due date, the Recipient shall provide the Department with the First Contract Period Deliverable
consisting of:
1. Documentation that the public is being given an opportunity to comment on the plan.
2. Documentation that neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation
activities, agencies that have the authority to regulate development, businesses, academia and other private
and non-profit interests are being invited and encouraged to actively participate in the planning process.
3. Documentation, where appropriate, that existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information were or
are being reviewed and are being incorporated into the plan. This documentation must include FMA and CRS
plans, if applicable
4. A description of the planning process that is being used to develop the plan, including how it is being
prepared, who is involved in the process, and how the public is involved.
Second Deliverable
Timeframe: Due by October 31 , 2004
Estimated Cost: $ 6,667.00
Federal Share: $ 5,000.00
Local Match: _ $ 1,667.00
By the due date, the Recipient shall provide the Department with the Second Contract Period Deliverable
consisting of:
1. A description of the type of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. At a minimum the Plan must
address the following hazards: Earthquakes; Tsunamis; Coastal and Riverine Erosion; Landslides/Sinkholes;
Hurricanes and Coastal Storms; Severe Stormsrrornadoes; Floods; Wildfires; Dam/Levee Failure;
Brought/Heat Wave; and Winter Storms/Freezes. The description must document how any additional hazards
were identified. If any of the above hazards are excluded, the Plan must document why they were excluded
from the jurisdiction's hazard analysis.'
2. A description of the location and extent of each identified hazard that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan
shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard
events for each identified hazard. When appropriate, the hazard analysis should also identify on a map the
areas affected by each identified hazard.
3. A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to each identified hazard. The description shall include an
overall summary of each identified hazard and its impact on the community.
4. A description of vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of existing buildings, infrastructure, and
critical facilities located in each identified hazard area. A rationale for designating a facility as critical shall be
included in this section. In the first update of the plan the vulnerability description should also include a
discussion of future buildings infrastructure and critical facilities, and the potential human and economic impact
that each identified hazard would have on the jurisdiction.
5. A description of vulnerability in terms of an estimate for each identified hazard of the potential dollar losses
to vulnerable structures identified and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimates.
6. A general description of land uses and development trends within the jurisdiction so that mitigation options
can be considered in future land use decisions.
7. An assessment of each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area for
each identified hazard.
Third Deliverable
Timeframe: Due by December 31, 2004
Estimated Cost: $ 6,667.00
Federal Share: $ 5,000.00
Local Match: $ 1,667,00
By the due date, the Recipient shall provide the Department with the Third Contract Period Deliverable
consisting of:
1. A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in
the risk assessment based on existing authorities, policies, programs and resources, and its ability to expand
on and improve these existing tools. The Mitigation Strategy shall address FEMA's Floodplain Map
Modernization Program and Repetitive Loss Initiative including: prioritization of mitigation measures towards
repetitive loss properties; fulfillment of CRS planning requirements, and FEMA's on-going field and database
verification projects for repetitive loss properties.
2. A description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards.
3. A plan section that identifies, evaluates, and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions
and projects being considered to reduce t'le effects of each hazard identified, with particular emphasis on new
and existing buildings and infrastructure.
4. An action plan describing how the actions identified will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by
the local jurisdiction. This Section shall include the implementation timeline; the funding sources or other
resources that Y'ill be used to implement tile strategy, when possible; and the agency or personnel responsible
for carrying out these actions. For FEMA program funding these mitigation measures must be cost effective,
environmentally sound and technically feasible. The local jurisdiction and the State must prioritize the
measures based on these criteria.
5. Individual action items for each jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval of or credit for the plan. For FEMA
program funding these mitigation measures must be cost effective, environmentally sound and technically
feasible. The local jurisdiction and the State must prioritize the measures based on these criteria.
6. A plan section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating and updating the mitigation
plan within a five-year cycle.
7. A description of the process by which local jurisdictions incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan
into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate.
8. A discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the ongoing mitigation planning
process.
Fourth Deliverable
Timeframe: Due by February 28, 2005
Estimated Cost: $ 6,666.00
Federal Share: $ 5,000.00
Local Match: $ 1,666.00
By the due date, the Recipient shall provide the Department with the Fourth Contract Period Deliverable
consisting of:
1. Documentation that at a minimum one public meeting after the completion of the draft and prior to the plan's
approval were conducted to solicit formal comments on the plan. In addition the Plan must document the
community's efforts to solicit comments from those residents who did not attend the public meetings.
2: The final revised Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) ready for submission to FEMA for review and approval
that fulfills all the requirements for local hazard mitigation plans. A FEMA/State Score Sheet and Crosswalk
(Attachment E) with the page numbers of the appropriate sections of the LMS filled in next to each criterion
must accompany the LMS.
Please note that the Interim Final Rule requirement for formal adoption by each participating
jurisdiction set forth below is outside the scope of this contract. LMS Working Groups may want to
delay presenting the plan to the jurisdictions for adoption until FEMA approves the substance of the
plan.
44 CFR 201.6(c}(5)- Multi-jurisdictional Plans shall include a copy of the executed resolution formally
adopted by the governing bodies of each of the jurisdictions requesting approval of the plan.
Fundinq Requirements
75% federal funds; 25% local match (local match may be cash or in-kind services or any combination of the
two). Please provide a project cost breakdown and specify how the Recipient intends to meet the local match.
It is understood that this local match breakout is for planning purposes only and the actual relationship of cash
to in-kind services may vary due to circumstance.
Total Project Cost $ 26,667.00
Federal Share $ 20,000.00
Local Match $ 6,667.00
C~h $ 0.00
In-kind $ 6,667.00