Item C05
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date:
Januarv 19. 2005
Division: Public Works
Bulk Item: Yes -L No
Department: Enaineerina/ConstructionManaaement
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval to use Park Impact Fees (District 3) for construction and
development of the Key Largo Skate Board Park.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Monroe County purchased the one-acre site located adjacent to the Key
Largo Community Park. The site has been fenced and graded in preparation for development of
the skate board park.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: At the BOCC meeting on November 19, 2003 motion
was made to approve a contract to purchase property as an addition to the Key Largo Community
Park.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
NONE
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval as stated above.
TOTAL COST: $500,000. (Imoact Fees)
To use up to $500,000. ($450,908. available - District 3)
BUDGETED: Yes .lL.. NO_
COST TO COUNTY: $500,000. (Imoact Fees)
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Park Imoact Fees
( 363273SR)
REVENUE PRODUCING: YES_ NO-1L AMOUNT PER MONTH
YEAR
APPROVED BY: County Atty.
Item Prepared By:
Risk Management
N/A
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
~t:T~
Dent Pierce, Division Director
DOCUMENTATION: Included ~ To follow
Not required
AGENDA ITEM #
C-,]
-
DISPOSITION:
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Impact Fee Expenditure Request
Section 1 - To be completed kKrequesting department
Requestor: David Koppel jft- Title: County Engineer
Facility type: Park & Recreation
Date: November 18. 2004
Project name Kev Largo Skate Park
Total Project Cost (capital only) $: 500.000.00
Description of project: recreational park facilities with equipment for in-line skating and skateboarding with
additional parking lot and landscaping.
Impact fee district: District 3
Boundaries of Service Area:Upper Keys
Boundaries within project's fee district: Yes _X_ No _ Type of project: Capital X_ Operational_ Maintenance
Project start date:. Useful life of project: 15 (Must exceed 5 years to qualify as capital project)
Project serves: Development that existed in 1986 _ started after 1986 _ projected beyond current year X-
Would project have been needed to maintain level of service standards if no growth had occurred since 1986:
Section 2 - Planning review //
Reviewe" ':('1141.1 V~ ~ Tided); e. &6 f1 ~I. .. 'UJJ. e. S. Date, I~h I b ~
Pro' r 'bl fi' fi fund' Y X N
ect e Igl e or unpact ee 109: es 0
Fund: District: Partial Funding $: Full Funding $:
County-Wide
Municipality
District 1 amount (Lower Keys)
District 2 amount (Middle Keys)
131 District 3 amount (Upper Keys) /I' 5"00.000
Notes:
Reviewer: itIe: ;/sJI.Cb. .I!-#f
Concur with planning review ~bject to planning review _ Notes:
Date, I~J~r
Tide, /kk./~ Date, ~/or-
Transfer request prepared: y"K){. Resolution prepared: Yes ~ _
Agenda summary prepared? Yes No Project code: f/ /11- Date ofBOCC action:
OMB Fonn Revised 7/28/98 - -