Item C32
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: 4/20105
DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BULK ITEM: YES
DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS
STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Peter Horton
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval to adopt the recommendation of the KWIA Ad Hoc Committee on Noise, to select
C&S and THC for future implementation of the Noise Insulation Program (NIP).
ITEM BACKGROUND: At their regularly scheduled meeting of April 5, 2005, the Ad Hoc committed voted to accept the
recommendation of the RFQ Selection Committee. Attached is a memo outlining the reasons for selecting the above two
firms. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was recently advertised, and the only two respondents were C&S and THe.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT SOCC ACTION: The soee selected THC to implement and coordinate NIP Ph III,
January 15, 2003.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
TOTAL COST: N/A
BUDGETED: N/A
eOST TO AIRPORT: N/A
COST TO PFC: N/A
COST TO COUNTY: N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A
REVENUE PRODUCING:
AMOUNT PER MONTH /YEAR:
APPROVED BY: County Attorney N/A
OMS/Purchasing N/A
Risk Management N/A
AIRPORT DIRECTOR APPROVAL
(-i<1t~ Horton
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
Not Required
AGENDA ITEM #
DISPOSITION:
Ibev
APB
, Key. West, '
International 'Airport,
To:
From:
Date:
Subject: :
KWIA Ad Hoc Committee on Noise
Peter J. Horton, Airports Directo~.}t
04/04/05 ' f-J
Recommendation From the Selection Committee for Future
Implementation of the Noise Insulation Program (NIP)
As you know, we recently advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the
remainder of the NIP program (a portion of Phase 4 and all of Phases 5, 6, and 7).
These phases indude more than 200 homes in the project area.
We received responses from two firms, C&S and THe.
The Selection Committee met at the airport on 03/23/05. All members agreed that
the finns were very evenly matched in qualifications. Therefore it was agreed that the
recommendation would be to split the NIP project up between the two firms and
choose both of them for the program.
We believe that our recommendation is a good one for the following reasons:
1. The two firms were scored with only two points difference between them
(THe 94.8 points, C&S 92.8).
2. Both firms are currently working with us in Phases 2, 3, and 4.
3. As evidenced by their allocation of $4.4 million to us this year for the project,
the FAA has faith in our program and these two firms that are implementing it
for us.
4. There is a healthy competition ongoing between the two now and by using
them both in the Mure, we believe that competition will continue.
5. By choosing both we have the possibility of completing the program in two
years instead of the scheduled four years. Although we assume that AlP
funding will be available for this project for many years to come, our current
AlP program only has two more years to run, therefore early completion may
be important
6. Choosing both firms will provide a back up in the event that one of them
cannot or will not perform to our expectations (as happened in Phase 1).
In summary, we believe that there is adequate work for both firms to accomplish,
and by choosing both we will insure a cost effective and expedient completion of the
project.
~
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Admi nistration
ORLANDO AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE
5950 Hazeltine National Dr., Suite 400
Orlando, Florida 32822-5024
Phone: (407) 812-6331 Fax: (407) 812-6978
March 8, 2005
Mr. Peter Horton
Director of Airports
Key West International Airport
3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd
Key West, Florida 33040
Dear Mr. Horton:
RE: Key West International Airport; Key West, Florida
AlP Number 3-12-0037-027.2005
FDOTNJPl Number PFLs 0003861 and 3954
Notice of Tentative Allocation
We are pleased to announce the Administrator has approved an allocation 0
$4.421,775 under the Fiscal Year 2005 Airport Improvement Program for the followin~
specific development at Key West International Airport:
Noise Mitigation Phase 4: Construction (50 homes), and Phase 5: Design
and Noise Contour Update
Our representative will soon discuss with you the project development, equa
employment opportunity and the civil rights requirements.
In allocating Federal funds for this project, we considered the representations in yoU!
Joint Airport Capital Improvement Program (JACIP) for Federal Assistance with regard~
to your commitment of local funds and your ability to proceed promptly with the project.
This allocation is contingent upon you developing a project schedule which allows thE
FAA to issue a grant offer based on bids by August 1, 2005. Therefore, we will need tc
receive your project application no later than July 15, 2005. Failure to comply with the
schedule may result in cancellation of this allocation. Please find enclosed, a copy 01
our "Project Management Checklist" which will be !Jsed to track the progress of this
project. After review of the information, please contact your Airports District Office
project manager to coordinate and establish the project schedule.
In accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, The County of Monroe, Florida will be required to
take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure that disadvantaged business
(,'\,1
UJ ·
...... LO
va
~(Y)
......... ..-...
C-.:;t
00
U"Q"
E::- .
'-rot
~tt::m
wcuQ.
n....... en
CfJ:.c
"Ocn~
c........L....
m..c Q)
L- Ol"O
.- C
Eo::~
Q) ~ (/)
--l---I>........
0)-- C
0.0 cD
E L.... E
o :J Q)
00.....
........
o u ::s
.........(\)0-
>-........ Q.)
......CL..
cOO)
=' 0 C
~"'O"'O
o "'5 c
o.oca
a...c. .........
Of/)~
E :J 6
::JO~
E >: c:
'x "0 m
ClJ1...4-
E co 0
O>CJ)
<D ~ :J
:5cnrn
.- +-II
Q) ..c (/)
>.........
OJ c Q)
..c-:5
..--.. . OJ
Woe
00 W"-
0.0' E
---'-Q.l
UJ 0............
ill CJ) Q)
C/J .- "0
.-..c 0
L.. .......
Q.L-+-'
.....IDO
2-01.0
CCC\I
Q):::JI.{)
-- .....-
c 0
(])
E 5
(]).-
>.......
ro 0
n..2
+"""
L... UJ
S25
()
U)
..........
cO)
Q) C
E~
~ .0
.- Q)
:Jc...
ITU)
@
L...
~J2
Bw
('IJ"u
..... s......
o co
..n "0
co C
-co
+-'
Ol(/)
C ~
~
en -
Q.)<:(
+-' a
...-
Q) I
...s::O
+-lit'-
. ("')
'-+-L.()
0-.
-00
Q)~
"U
C
o
E<C
~ c
Q)u
L- Q)
m c
::J+:;
o ::J
~o
- c
~o
m:';:::::; :::
co.
O ::J U)
""'L
......~o
"'0(/)0..
""'CL..
.....". 0....-.
<(0<(
.......,
u
(])
'---'
o
L.....
a.
en
..c
.........
4-
a
+-'
C
())
E
...c
r.n
.-
n.
E
o
u
C)
co
:::J
"+--
(/)
(J)
CD
U
o
::s
rJ)
tD
..c
........
C
:J
o
>..
...c
........
=::
rn
c
~
10....
o
3:
o
.......
-0
L-
ea
~
J2
.::s::.
o
o
~
,I
)
.
l--
Q)
0>
C
.-
L..
.........
en
c '-
m CD
(])O'J
o ~
~~
coE
--
r- .co
o~
O'
l.L.(fJ
_cr::
o=>
co
..ct
U ill
co ,en
~(])(1)
O-oC(:
"(JJ c==
g<(<(~