Loading...
Resolution 402-2021 1 �l 2 3 zs,l61R; 4 �\� 6 7 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 8 9 RESOLUTION NO. 402-2021 10 11 A RESOLUTION BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 12 COMMISSIONERS APPROVING THE U.S. 1 TRANSPORTATION MASTER 13 PLAN PREPARED FOR MONROE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE 14 MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. 15 16 WHEREAS, Monroe County policies and regulations adopted in the Monroe County 17 Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") and Land Development Code ("LDC") are to maintain 18 public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and to strengthen our local 19 government capability to manage land use and development; and 20 21 WHEREAS, Policy 301.4.1 of the Comprehensive Plan requires Monroe County to complete 22 a Transportation Strategy Master Plan, through its Long Range Transportation Plan, by May 2021, 23 incorporating an intermodal transportation system and considerations of climate change implications; 24 and 25 26 WHEREAS, Policy 301.5.2 of the Comprehensive Plan requires by May 2021, Monroe 27 County shall complete the County's Long Range Transportation Plan incorporating the considerations 28 of climate change implications; and 29 30 WHEREAS, Policy 401.3.1 of the Comprehensive Plan states that by May 2021, Monroe 31 County shall complete a Transportation Strategy Master Plan, through its Long Range Transportation 32 Plan, to enhance mass transit for all residents and visitors, in coordination with municipalities and 33 Miami-Dade County; and 34 35 WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.2 and Land Development Code Sections 114- 36 2 and 114-200 adopt the overall and segment level of service ("LOS") standard for U.S. Highway 1 37 ("U.S. 1") as LOS "C," represented by a median speed of 45 mph; and 38 39 WHEREAS, the Florida Keys are a chain of islands that are connected to each other and the 40 mainland by 112 miles of U.S. 1, extending from Key Largo to Key West; and 41 42 WHEREAS,traffic issues on U.S. 1 affect the health, safety,welfare, economic sustainability 43 and quality of life of the residents and visitors to the Florida Keys; and 44 45 WHEREAS, the Florida Keys are dependent on a safe, attractive, resilient, sustainable, and 46 efficient access and travel along U.S. 1 throughout Monroe County; and 47 1 of 3 I WHEREAS, on May 20, 2020, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners 2 ("BOCC") approved the completion a Transportation Master Plan ("TMP") to provide 3 recommendations for U.S. 1 improvements to remedy LOS issues and to improve traffic flow within 4 Monroe County and multimodal improvements; and 5 6 WHEREAS, the development of the U.S. 1 TMP includes reviewing relevant existing data, 7 such as traffic volumes, crash data, transit information; meet with stakeholders to get input on 8 transportation issues and improvement opportunities;public input from numerous sources and public 9 meetings; analyzing these factors to identify potential issues and develop potential high-level 10 solutions, including roadway and multi-modal solutions to address the needs of pedestrians, 11 bicyclists,public transit, and vehicular traffic; and 12 13 WHEREAS, it is anticipated the U.S. 1 TMP recommended potential project list will be 14 further presented and reviewed by the BOCC to evaluate the opportunities and constraints, and to 15 select and prioritize the projects into timeframes of near-term (2021-2025), mid-term (2026-2030), 16 long-term (2031-2040), and visionary (2041 and beyond) at future meetings; and 17 18 WHEREAS, it is anticipated the municipal jurisdictions will adopt resolutions to provide the 19 BOCC with recommendations and prioritization from the U.S. 1 TMP recommended potential project 20 list; and 21 22 WHEREAS, it is anticipated the BOCC and municipal jurisdictions will select prioritized 23 projects from the U.S. 1 TMP recommended potential project list for a coordinated submission to the 24 Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for review, consideration and funding; and 25 26 WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, at their regular meeting, the BOCC discussed the U. S. 1 27 Transportation Master Plan; and 28 29 WHEREAS, the BOCC hereby makes the following findings of facts: 30 31 1. The U. S. 1 Transportation Master Plan addresses an intermodal transportation system and 32 considers climate change impacts; and 33 34 2. The U. S. 1 Transportation Master Plan addresses mass transit for all residents and visitors, 35 in coordination with municipalities and Miami-Dade County; and 36 37 3. The U. S. 1 Transportation Master Plan was developed in coordination with the public, 38 stakeholders, and municipalities; 39 40 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 41 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: 42 43 Section 1. Recitals and Legislative Intent. The foregoing recitals, findings of fact, and 44 statements of legislative intent are true and correct and are hereby incorporated as if fully 45 stated herein. 46 47 Section 2. The U.S. 1 Transportation Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is 48 hereby incorporated as if fully stated herein. 2of3 1 2 Section 3. The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners does hereby approve the 3 U.S. 1 Transportation Master Plan, including the wide-ranging potential solution/project list, 4 for County use in coordination with the municipalities,to review,select and prioritize projects. 5 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at 7 a regular meeting of the Board held on the 20th day of October 2021. 8 9 10 Mayor Michelle Coldiron Yes 11 Mayor Pro Tern David Rice Yes 12 Commissioner Craig Cates Yes 13 Commissioner Eddie Martinez Yes 14 Commissioner Holly Merrill Raschein Yes 15 16 17 00 1:' ® BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .t es- ��s . . • OF MONROE CO i DA ,A , ,,, .-:. • :.1 ezeiD. citii. .,.. v'qe r', -..)` 11 23 •.`�'-'' .` MAYOR MICHELLE COLDIRON 24 •44..,.couwo 25 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK 26 MONROE CO ATTORNEY 27 APP TO FORM 28 By: 29 AS DE UTY CLERK —7 30 PETER MORRIS 31 ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY Date: . 10/5/21 -2---.- NI L "p'} 3 of 3 III I t f t r v-, _ � 1 �, r, h Y — b 14 i — G � r ji v� s � - - + s — TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOF TABLES ...................................................................................................................IV LISTOF FIGURES...................................................................................................................V APPENDICES.........................................................................................................................VI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... 7 2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 22 2.1 ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION/GEOMETRY..................................................................... 24 3 DATA COLLECTION................................................................................................... 27 3.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES..................................................................................................... 27 3.2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS...................................................................................................... 27 3.3 FUNCTIONAL/CONTEXT/ACCESS MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATION ................................... 28 3.4 CRASH SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 29 3.5 MULTIMODAL SERVICES.............................................................................................. 29 3.5.1 TRANSIT SERVICES................................................................................................. 29 3.5.2 WATER-BASED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES............................................................... 34 3.5.3 AIR TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................ 35 3.6 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED PROJECTS ....................................................................... 35 3.7 RESILIENCY AND CLIMATE CHANGE.............................................................................. 35 4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT............................................................................................. 38 4.1 PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS....................................................................................... 38 4.1.1 STAKEHOLDER MEETING ......................................................................................... 38 4.1.2 PUBLIC MEETING #1............................................................................................... 40 4.1.3 PUBLIC MEETING #2............................................................................................... 41 4.1.4 WEBSITE-BASED INPUT: ONLINE PUBLIC SURVEY....................................................... 42 4.1.5 WEBSITE-BASED INPUT: ONLINE MAPPING INPUT....................................................... 44 4.1.6 WEBSITE-BASED INPUT: CONTACT US....................................................................... 46 4.2 SUMMARY OF INPUT RECEIVED FROM PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS................................... 46 4.2.1 CREATE A BALANCED MULTIMODAL NETWORK ........................................................... 46 4.2.2 ADDRESS RECURRING CONGESTION.......................................................................... 47 4.2.3 ENHANCE TRAFFIC SAFETY...................................................................................... 48 4.2.4 INFRASTRUCTURE AND RESILIENCY........................................................................... 48 4.2.5 BALANCE IMPACTS OF TOURIST TRAFFIC WITH LOCAL TRAFFIC NEEDS.......................... 48 4.3 FINAL PUBLIC MEETING.............................................................................................. 49 5 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES......................................................................................... 53 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 56 6.1 CRASH DATA ANALYSIS.............................................................................................. 56 6.1.1 US 1 FROM THE COUNTY LINE TO CALOOSA COVE...................................................... 59 6.1.2 US 1 SB LANES FROM BUTTONWOOD BAY TO NORTH OCEAN BAY DRIVE....................... 59 6.1.3 US 1 SB LANES FROM HARBOR VIEW DR.TO 0.28 MILES N. OF VALJEAN LANE............... 60 I I 6.1.4 US 1 FROM CALOOSA COVE ENT. TO 0.834 MILES S. OF TOM HARBOR BRIDGE .............. 60 6.1.5 US 1 FROM SOUTH OF TOM HARBOR BRIDGE TO PALM ISLAND AVENUE......................... 60 6.1.6 US 1 FROM PALM ISLAND AVENUE TO SANDS ROAD.................................................... 61 6.1.7 US 1 FROM SANDS ROAD TO MACDONALD AVENUE..................................................... 61 6.1.8 US 1 FROM MACDONALD AVENUE TO FLEMING STREET............................................... 62 6.1.9 SOUTH ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD FROM FAIRFIELD INLET TO BERTHA STREET ................. 62 6.1.10 FATAL CRASH SUMMARY......................................................................................... 63 6.1.11 FDOT HIGH CRASH LIST LOCATIONS........................................................................ 64 6.1.12 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY ANALYSIS............................................................ 67 7.1 FIELD REVIEWS ......................................................................................................... 72 7.1.1 ROOSEVELT BLVD, COLLEGE RD SOUTH, $ CROSS STREET.......................................... 72 7.2 TRAFFIC FORECASTING............................................................................................... 75 7.3 TRANSIT ANALYSIS.................................................................................................... 81 7.3.1 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS........................................................................................... 81 7.3.2 TRANSIT RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................. 88 7 ROADWAY ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 95 7.4 CAPACITY BASED ROADWAY ANALYSIS......................................................................... 95 7.4.1 KEY WEST ............................................................................................................ 95 7.4.2 BOCA CHICA KEY................................................................................................... 96 7.4.3 BIG PINE KEY........................................................................................................ 97 7.4.4 MARATHON ........................................................................................................... 97 7.4.5 ISLAMORADA ......................................................................................................... 98 7.4.6 KEY LARGO........................................................................................................... 98 7.5 POTENTIAL NEW BRIDGES........................................................................................... 99 7.5.1 STOCK ISLAND TO/FROM KEY WEST BRIDGE............................................................... 99 7.5.2 BIG PINE KEY BRIDGE .......................................................................................... 102 7.5.3 UPPER MATECUMBE BRIDGE.................................................................................. 103 8 WATER TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS................................................................... 106 7.6 PASSENGER FERRY SYSTEM OVERVIEW...................................................................... 107 7.7 COMMUNITY SNAPSHOTS.......................................................................................... 110 7.7.1 KEY WEST .......................................................................................................... 112 7.7.2 STOCK ISLAND..................................................................................................... 119 7.7.3 MARATHON ......................................................................................................... 125 7.7.4 ISLAMORADA ....................................................................................................... 131 7.7.5 MIAMI (COCONUT GROVE)..................................................................................... 137 7.8 FUNDING RESOURCES............................................................................................... 141 7.8.1 MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) ................................................................... 141 7.8.2 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND.............................................................................. 141 7.8.3 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) ............................................................. 142 8.1.1 FHWA FERRY BOATS AND TERMINAL FACILITIES FORMULA PROGRAM (FBP)............... 143 7.8.4 FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT.................................................................. 144 7.9 ROUTE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 145 7.9.1 OPTION 1 -STOCK ISLAND TO KEY WEST ................................................................ 149 7.9.2 OPTION 2- MARATHON TO KEY WEST..................................................................... 152 7.9.3 OPTION 3-ISLAMORADA TO KEY WEST .................................................................. 155 III 7.9.4 OPTION 4-MIAMI TO KEY WEST............................................................................ 157 7.10 FINDINGS................................................................................................................ 160 7.10.1 EVALUATION OF MIAMI AND STOCK ISLAND SERVICES............................................... 161 7.11 CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................................... 164 7.12 NEXT STEPS ........................................................................................................... 165 7.12.1 COMPLETE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/STUDY ............................................................ 165 7.12.2 INVESTIGATE FUNDING RESOURCES........................................................................ 166 7.1 2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF RISK REGISTER.......................................................................... 166 7.1 2.4 CONSIDER NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................. 166 9 INNOVATIVE IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................... 168 7.13 EMERGING TRANSPORTATION TRENDS........................................................................ 168 7.14 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS(ITS) .......................................................... 173 7.15 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS........................................ 173 7.16 ASSESSMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS............................................ 176 7.17 INNOVATIVE IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................... 180 10 FUNDING ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 184 7.18 FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES..................................................................................... 184 7.19 FORMULA FUNDS..................................................................................................... 185 7.20 COMPETITIVE GRANTS.............................................................................................. 187 7.21 TRANSIT................................................................................................................. 189 7.22 STATE FUNDING SOURCES........................................................................................ 190 7.22.1 STATE-HIGHWAY FUNDING.................................................................................... 191 7.22.2 STATE FUEL TAXES.............................................................................................. 191 7.22.3 STATE MOTOR VEHICLE FEES................................................................................ 193 7.22.4 STATE AVIATION FUEL TAX................................................................................... 194 7.22.5 STATE DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX......................................................................... 194 7.23 LOCAL AND LOCAL-OPTION FUNDING SOURCES............................................................ 195 7.23.1 LOCAL OPTION FUEL TAXES .................................................................................. 195 7.23.2 LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX.................................................................................... 197 7.23.3 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT AND TOURIST IMPACT FEES................................................. 199 7.23.4 AD VALOREM TAXES............................................................................................. 200 7.24 POTENTIAL NEW FUNDING SOURCES .......................................................................... 201 7.25 SUMMARY OF REASONABLE AVAILABLE FUNDING......................................................... 203 7.26 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES .............................................................. 204 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................... 206 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1-1: POTENTIAL SOLUTION LIST......................................................................................................... 1 7 TABLE 3-1:SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS....................................................................................27 TABLE 3-2:ACCESS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS FOR CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES.........................................29 TABLE 6-1:CRASH DATA SUMMARY(201 4 TO 201 8)..................................................................................... 557 TABLE 6-2:SUMMARY OF FDOT HIGH CRASH INTERSECTIONS ......................................................................... 64 TABLE 6-3:SUMMARY OF FDOT HIGH CRASH SEGMENTS................................................................................ 66 TABLE 6-4:SERPM V8.511 US'I EXTERNAL(SOUTH OF CR 905A) ...............................................................76 IV TABLE 6-5: FLSWM V7 GROWTH RATES 2015 AND 2045(DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC)............................................77 TABLE6-6: BEBR POPULATION GROWTH......................................................................................................78 TABLE 6-7:GROWTH RATE ANALYSIS AND FUTURE 2040 TRAFFIC ESTIMATION.................................................. 80 TABLE 6-8: US CENSUS BLOCKS WITH HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITHOUT VEHICLE ACCESS,2019... 82 TABLE 6-9: US CENSUS BLOCKS WITH HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS EXPERIENCING POVERTY,2019 ..... 85 TABLE8-1: EXISTING PASSENGER FERRY SERVICES-OVERVIEW...................................................................... 107 TABLE8-2: EXISTING PASSENGER FERRY SERVICE-DETAILS........................................................................... 109 TABLE8-3: EXISTING FERRY VESSEL AND DOCK DETAILS .............................................................................. 109 TABLE8-4: MONROE COUNTY ANNUAL VISITOR PROFILE STUDY..................................................................... 112 TABLE8-5:WATERWAYS-KEY WEST........................................................................................................... 113 TABLE8-6: EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES-KEY WEST.................................................................................. 113 TABLE8-7: KEY WEST CITY ROUTE-FARES................................................................................................ 115 TABLE8-8: LOWER KEYS SHUTTLE-FARE.................................................................................................... 116 TABLE8-9:WATERWAYS-STOCK ISLAND..................................................................................................... 120 TABLE8-10: EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES-STOCK ISLAND........................................................................... 120 TABLE8-1 1:WATERWAYS-MARATHON....................................................................................................... 125 TABLE8-12: EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES-MARATHON............................................................................... 126 TABLE8-1 3:WATERWAYS-ISLAMORADA..................................................................................................... 132 TABLEB-1 4: EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES-ISLAMORADA............................................................................. 132 TABLE8-15:WATERWAYS-MIAMI............................................................................................................... 137 TABLE 8-16: EXAMPLES OF SOME CURRENT CCF FUNDHOLDERS..................................................................... 142 TABLE 8-17: EXAMPLES OF PFG PROGRAM FUND ALLOCATIONS IN THE LAST 5 YEARS...................................... 142 TABLE 8-18: MIAMI,FLORIDA URBAN AREA SECTION 5337 FUND ALLOCATION ................................................ 143 TABLE8-19:SAMPLE OF 2018 FBP FUND ALLOCATIONS .............................................................................. 143 TABLE8-20: POTENTIAL FERRY SERVICE SCHEMES...................................................................................... 149 TABLE8-21:SUMMARY OF ROUTE ANALYSIS FINDINGS................................................................................. 160 TABLE8-22: MIAMI TO KEY WEST-RESULT SUMMARY................................................................................... 164 TABLE 8-23:STOCK ISLAND TO KEY WEST-RESULT SUMMARY..................................................................... 165 TABLE 9-1:TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS.................................................................................... 169 TABLE 9-2:TSM&O STRATEGIES.............................................................................................................. 174 TABLE 9-3:TECHNOLOGY TRENDS AND INFLUENCES THAT SUPPORT TSM&O STRATEGIES................................. 175 TABLE9-4:ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TRENDS...................................................................................... 177 TABLE 10-1:SUMMARY OF REASONABLE AVAILABLE EXISTING FUNDING,FY2021-2040...................................204 TABLE 10-2:SUMMARY OF REASONABLE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL FUNDING, FY2021-2040................................204 TABLE10-3: POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES AND PROJECT TYPES BY MODE.....................................................204 TABLE 11-1: POTENTIAL SOLUTION LIST.....................................................................................................206 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP ..........................................................................................................23 FIGURE 2-2:US 1 TYPICAL SECTION SUMMARY.............................................................................................26 FIGURE 3-1:KEY WEST TRANSITS LOWER KEYS SHUTTLE .............................................................................. 30 FIGURE 3-2:KEY WEST TRANSITS NORTH ROUTE.......................................................................................... 31 FIGURE 3-3:KEY WEST TRANSITS SOUTH ROUTE.......................................................................................... 32 FIGURE 3-4:KEY WEST TRANSITS DUVAL LOOP CIRCULATOR.......................................................................... 33 FIGURE 3-5:MIAMI-DADE TRANSITS ROUTE 301 DADE-MONROE EXPRESS ........................................................ 34 FIGURE 3-6:UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION SOURCE: MONROE COUNTY WEBSITE).................................. 37 FIGURE 4-1:MENTI.COM USED TO CONDUCT SURVEYS DURING THE STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC MEETING................. 39 FIGURE 4-2:SAMPLE OF THE WEBSITE SURVEY..............................................................................................44 FIGURE 4-3:THE WEBSITE SERVED AS A CRITICAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOOL......................................................45 FIGURE 6-1:FATAL CRASH TYPE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 64 V FIGURE6-2: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CRASH DATA BY LIGHTING CONDITION ................................................... 68 FIGURE6-3: PEDESTRIAN CRASH DATA BY TIME OF DAY..................................................................................68 FIGURE6-4: BICYCLE CRASH DATA BY TIME OF DAY....................................................................................... 69 FIGURE6-5: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CRASH DATA BY DAY OF WEEK ............................................................. 69 FIGURE 6-6: EB LEFT-TURN QUEUES FROM THE US 1/ROOSEVELT BLVD INTERSECTION ........................................73 FIGURE6-7:WESTBOUND QUEUES ON CROSS STREET.....................................................................................74 FIGURE 6-8:NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN QUEUES AT THE US 1/COLLEGE ROAD SOUTH INTERSECTION ......................75 FIGURE 6-9:TRAFFIC TREND ANALYSIS GROWTH PATTERNS SOURCE:TRAFFIC FORECASTING HANDBOOK 2019)...76 FIGURE 6-10:VEHICLE ACCESS BY BLOCK GROUP: KEY WEST AND THE LOWER KEYS,2019................................ 83 FIGURE 6-11:VEHICLE ACCESS BY BLOCK GROUP: MARATHON,ISLAMORADA,AND KEY LARGO,2019................... 83 FIGURE6-12:ZERO-VEHICLE HOUSEHOLD GAP ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 84 FIGURE 6-13: POVERTY BY BLOCK GROUP: KEY WEST AND THE LOWER KEYS,2019........................................... 86 FIGURE 6-14: POVERTY BY BLOCK GROUP: MARATHON,ISLAMORADA,AND KEY LARGO,2019 ............................. 86 FIGURE 6-1 S:HOUSEHOLDS EXPERIENCING POVERTY GAP ANALYSIS, KEY LARGO.............................................. 87 FIGURE 6-16:HOUSEHOLDS EXPERIENCING POVERTY GAP ANALYSIS, LONG KEY AND DUCK KEY.......................... 87 FIGURE 6-17:CONCEPTUAL QUEUE JUMP AT THE INTERSECTION OF US 1 &KEY DEER BOULEVARD, BIG PINE KEY 93 FIGURE 7-1: POTENTIAL NEW BRIDGE OPTIONS-STOCK ISLAND TO KEY WEST................................................. 100 FIGURE7-2: POTENTIAL BIG PINE KEY BYPASS BRIDGE................................................................................ 102 FIGURE7-3: POTENTIAL UPPER MATECUMBE BYPASS BRIDGE........................................................................ 104 FIGURE8-1:FIVE COMMUNITY LOCATIONS.................................................................................................. 111 FIGURE8-2: PORT OF KEY WEST................................................................................................................ 114 FIGURE8-3:KEY WEST BIGHT................................................................................................................... 115 FIGURE8-4:STOCK ISLAND....................................................................................................................... 121 FIGURE8-5: BOOT KEY HARBOR................................................................................................................ 126 FIGURE8-6:NORTH ISLAMORADA............................................................................................................... 132 FIGURE8-7: DINNER KEY MARINA,COCONUT GROVE, MIAMI ......................................................................... 138 FIGURE8-8: PRINCIPAL ROUTES ................................................................................................................ 146 FIGURE9-1: EMERGING TRANSPORTATION TRENDS....................................................................................... 168 FIGURE 9-2:INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.................................................................................. 173 APPENDICES APPENDIX A-TRANSIT ROUTE MAPS APPENDIX B- PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED PROJECT SUMMARIES APPENDIX C- MONROE COUNTY ELEVATION MAPS APPENDIX D- PUBLIC INPUT PRESENTATIONS, SURVEYS AND RESULTS APPENDIX E-CRASH DATA SUMMARY TABLES AND MAPS APPENDIX F- FDOT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS APPENDIX G- POTENTIAL SOLUTION LIST VI I Executive Summary This US 1 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) was developed pursuant to the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policies to identify potential solutions to address existing and future transportation concerns along US 1 through the Florida Keys. The study limits include the following roadway segments: • US 1 (SR 5/ Overseas Highway) from the Miami-Dade/Monroe County Line to Roosevelt Boulevard in Key West. • North Roosevelt Boulevard from US 1 to White Street in Key West • South Roosevelt Boulevard (SR A1A) from US 1 to Bertha Street in Key West • Intersection of Card Sound Road and CR 905 • Frontage Roads connecting to US 1 - Old Highway, Plantation Key - Old Highway 4A, Islamorada - Frontage Road along the north side of US 1 in Lower Matecumbe Key - Airport Access Road, Marathon - Avenue A, Big Pine Key - Old Highway 4A, Ramrod Key - Flagship Drive, Summerland Key As part of this study, relevant data (such as traffic volumes, crash data, transit data, origin-destination data, and census data) was gathered and reviewed to identify potential areas for improvement. In addition, stakeholder and public meetings were held to obtain input on transportation issues and improvement opportunities. Based on the data reviewed and input received from the public and stakeholders, TMP goals and objectives were developed. Potential high-level solutions were then identified to address these goals. The potential solutions identified in this TMP need to be evaluated further considering factors such as feasibility, public acceptance, potential impacts, cost, effectiveness, etc. prior to implementation. The potential solutions were categorized into short-term solutions for implementation during the next 1 to 5 years, mid-term solutions for implementation during the next 5 to10 years, and long-term solutions for implementation during the next 10 to 20 years. Also, potential funding sources were reviewed and identified. A summary of the findings based on a review of the data gathered and analysis conducted is provided below: • Input received through the initial stakeholder and public outreach efforts included: 7 o Stakeholder Meeting: Expressed desire for improvements related to transit, bicycle and pedestrian safety, and congestion relief. o Public Meetings and Public Survey: The public expressed a need for improvements related to pedestrian and bicycle facilities, congestion relief, safety, public transportation, and access management. The respondents also indicated a willingness to reduce vehicle use if multi-modal facilities were provided. • A review of the crash data obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for the five-year period from 2014 to 2018 indicated that the primary crash types along US 1 were rear-end, sideswipe, angle, run-off-road, and pedestrian/bicycle. In general, the percentage of nighttime and wet road surface crashes were below the statewide averages. However, two of the segments on the southern end of US 1 experienced a slightly higher percentage of nighttime crashes. • A total of 69 fatal crashes were reported during the five-year referenced period. These were primarily head-on (13), pedestrian (11), angle (10), and fixed object(7) crashes. In general, the fatal crashes were scattered throughout the study area with a higher concentration of crashes observed in the segments along US 1 from Mile Marker (MM) 0 to 4, MM 48 to 53, MM 77 to 80, MM 84 to 86, and MM 94 to 102. • Each year FDOT identifies intersections and segments that are experiencing higher than average crash rates and develops High Crash Location Lists. Several locations within the study corridor were identified on the FDOT High Crash Lists during the five-year study period. A few notable locations that were on the high crash lists for multiple years included US 1 at Tarpon Basin Drive, Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Avenue, Burton Drive, College Road South, and Roosevelt Boulevard. • A review of the FDOT Five-year Work Program shows several programmed projects within Monroe County, including new traffic signals, roadway and bridge rehabilitation projects, sidewalk improvements, pedestrian crosswalks, and signal infrastructure improvements. Additionally, there is a planning study to explore options for replacing the current Snake Creek drawbridge with a high level fixed bridge, which will help improve traffic flow along US 1. The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) Management Plan developed in August 2018 provides a summary of the improvements planned along the FKOHT. • A review of the current (2019) and projected (2040) traffic volumes indicated that there are several segments that would need roadway improvements to meet the FDOT Level of Service criteria. 8 • A review of the current transit services indicates that there may be opportunities for improvements such as providing better amenities at bus stops, adding additional stops in the areas experiencing poverty and/or low auto ownership, extending Miami-Dade Transit service to the southern end of Marathon, or intra-island shuttles to provide first/last mile service. An Origin-Destination study completed in 2018 indicated that a large percentage of trips were internal (i.e. began and ended on the same Key). This was most prevalent in Key West, Marathon, Islamorada, and Key Largo, indicating that intra-island shuttles in these areas could help to reduce traffic associated with shorter trips along US 1. • US 1 serves as the primary roadway providing access to different keys, from Key Largo to Key West. Given the limited right-of-way along US 1 and current Monroe County Land Development Code restrictions, there is a need to explore alternative modes of transportation to help relieve congestion and improve safety along US 1. As such, some alternative transportation options such as water taxis/ferries, aerial gondolas, air taxis, and improved transit options were considered as part of this TMP. These alternative modes of transportation can also help during emergency evacuations (such as hurricanes). As part of this TMP, several goals and objectives were developed based on a review of the existing conditions, stakeholder, and public input received. These goals and objectives are summarized below: Goal 1 — Create a balanced multimodal transportation system Objective 1-1: Construct new and/or improve existing bicycle facilities. Objective 1-2: Improve pedestrian access along and across US 1 through the provision of wider sidewalks and marked crosswalks. Objective 1-3: Improve transit options for both commuters and tourists. Objective 1-4: Explore options to provide water-based transportation, such as water taxi/ferry. Objective 1-5: Evaluate bridges to explore the feasibility of improvements to accommodate all road users, including pedestrians and bicyclists. Objective 1-6: Allow for travel demand management through introduction/promotion of bikeshare, carpool, and other commuting options. Goal 2—Address congestion through improved traffic management Objective 2-1: Evaluate the speed limits at the areas identified through public input to ensure they are appropriate based on FDOT criteria. Objective 2-2: Improve management of signalized intersections. 9 Objective 2-3: Implement access management improvements with respect to driveways, median openings, turn lanes, unsignalized intersections, etc. Objective 2-4: Review and enhance event management procedures to better manage traffic. Objective 2-5: Develop a coordination plan to enhance inter-agency coordination between FDOT, Monroe County, and local government agencies, to identify and address traffic issues. Goal 3— Enhance traffic safety Objective 3-1: Work with FDOT and law enforcement agencies in the identification and evaluation of safety "hot spots" and implementation of safety improvements through the "4E" approach (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Response). Objective 3-2: Maintain shoulders and bicycle lanes to increase their designated use. Objective 3-3: Improve pavement marking and signage along portions of US 1 that have been identified, through the public outreach efforts of this study, as areas of concern. Goal 4— Preserve the beauty of the unique Scenic Byway Objective 4-1: Protect and preserve wildlife needs during the design and maintenance of infrastructure. Objective 4-2: Design infrastructure improvements to be resilient to hurricanes and sea level rise. Objective 4-3: Maintain/rehabilitate/replant landscaping after hurricanes. Goal 5— Improve infrastructure to meet the needs of tourists while accommodating local traffic Objective 5-1: Improve multimodal access to the US 1 corridor and provide associated first/last- mile transportation options including park and ride facilities, and parking management systems. Objective 5-2: Evaluate the existing and potential infrastructure to provide viewing/pull-off areas at appropriate locations. Objective 5-3: Improve public awareness through advertising and/or signage to increase the use of multimodal facilities by tourists. Goal 6— Preserve/Maintain existing infrastructure Objective 6-1: Maintain existing pavement through periodic resurfacing. Objective 6-2: Identify bridges in need of maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement. 10 Goal 7— Emerging Technology Applications Objective 7-1: Explore emerging technology applications to improve transportation in the areas of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Transit, Traffic Signals, and Incident Management. Based on the analysis conducted as part of this study, several potential solutions were developed to meet these goals/objectives and to help improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and accommodate all road users. These solutions were then categorized into short-term, mid-term, and long-term projects based on projected cost, funding availability, project complexity, need for feasibility studies, inter- governmental agency coordination, right-of-way/utility/environmental impacts, and potential permitting requirements. The project list is provided in Table 1-1. It should be noted some of the potential solutions have been programmed as projects in the current FDOT Five-year Work Program (see Appendix B) and some others are being evaluated by FDOT and Florida DER As such, only the remaining potential solutions are being shown in Table 1-1. A complete project list, including project limits, any FDOT programmed and/or planned projects, and potential considerations such as right-of-way requirements, permits, potential impacts, public involvement, agency coordination, etc. is provided in Appendix G. Table 1-1: Potential Solution List Ref# W Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and 1 Key West marking improvements (including Short-term additional crosswalks) along S. Roosevelt Boulevard from Flagler Avenue to US 1. Conduct a corridor study to evaluate the need for pedestrian signing and lighting 2 Key West enhancements, including additional Mid-term midblock crosswalks along N. Roosevelt Boulevard from Jose Marti Drive to US 1 3 Key West Conduct a signal retiming study to Mid-term optimize signal timing in Key West Conduct a lighting evaluation study Requires coordination with 5 Key West at crosswalks along South Mid-term stakeholders as well as Florida Roosevelt Boulevard from Flagler Fish and Wildlife Conservation Avenue to Bertha Street Commission. 11 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a review to improve 6 Key West pedestrian and bicycle features at Mid-term the US1/Roosevelt Boulevard intersection Conduct a feasibility study to widen Potential access management 7 Key West sidewalks on the southside of North I Mid-term impacts; requires public Roosevelt Blvd involvement Feasibility study to reconfigure the I Potential right-of-way impacts. 8 Key West I intersection of US-1 and Roosevelt Mid-term Requires coordination with Boulevard stakeholders and public acceptance .... .... ... ... ... Modify signal timing (offsets) along j 20 Stock Island US 1 between Roosevelt Boulevard Short-term Requires Coordination with and MacDonald Avenue to help FDOT Traffic Operations Office improve traffic flow. .... .... ... .... .................................................... .... .... ... ... .. Review and identify potential pedestrian and bicycle signing and 21 Stock Island marking improvements along US 1 Short-term from Roosevelt Boulevard to MacDonald Avenue. Evaluate the need for signing, pavement marking and sight 22 Stock Island distance improvements along the Short-term bike lanes in the vicinity of the Hurricane Hole Marina (near College Road South) Conduct a corridor study to Requires modifications to the evaluate the feasibility of widening Monroe County Comp Plan 23 Stock Island US-1 to 6 lanes and/or intersectionI Long-term Policies and improvements between Roosevelt widening/reconstruction of the Boulevard and College Road North bridge between Key West and .. Stock Island ... FDOT's Consultant is conducting a feasibility study for Conduct a planning study to I the Key West Intermodal Center evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n- (park-n-ride hub to Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, accommodate buses, vehicles, 24 Stock Island micro transit, bike sharing, and/or Long-term scooters, bicycles, etc.)to be scooter-sharing services to provide I located on Stock Island. Monroe first/last mile connections to I County can coordinate with Key complement public transit West Transit and FDOT regarding this study and the Final Mile Grant. Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of installing an 26 Rockland Key acceleration lane in the southbound Mid-term direction at the intersection of US-1 and Calle Uno 12 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of relocating the merge Potential R/W impacts; may 27 Rockland Key area from the current location on Mid-term require modifications to the Monroe County Comp Plan the curve near Rockland Drive to a straight segment of US 1. Policies Conduct an access management study to evaluate the need for turn Potential access impacts; 28 Rockland Key lanes and/or frontage road Mid-term requires public involvement improvements along US-1 from Coppitt Road to Boca Chica Road Feasibility study for possible May require modifications to the 29 Rockland Key intersection improvements along Mid-term Monroe County Comp Plan US 1 between Saratoga Avenue to Policies; potential R/W impacts Rockland Drive Conduct a study to determine the I Requires modifications to the 30 Rockland Key need for and feasibility of widening Long-term Monroe County Comp Plan US-1 to 4 lanes from Rockland Policies; potential R/W impacts Drive to Boca Chica Road and bridge widening .... .................................................. Conduct a study to evaluate the 31 Rockland Key feasibility of widening the sidewalk Long-term Potential R/W and 1along the southside of the Boca I environmental impacts -Chica Bridge Conduct a review to identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing 35 Big Coppitt and pavement marking Short-term Key improvements along US 1 from Saratoga Avenue to Boca Chica Road This location is only 0.75mi from Boca Chica Road where a Big Coppitt Conduct a Signal Warrant study at Signal is also requested. 36 Key the intersection of US-1 at 4th Mid-term Consider conducting a corridor Street study so that potential impacts of having both of these signals can be determined This location is only 0.75mi from Conduct a Signal Warrant study at 4th Street where a Signal is also 37 Big Coppitt the intersection of US-1 at Boca Mid-term requested. Consider conducting Key Chica Road a corridor study so that potential impacts of having both of these signals can be determined Refurbish/upgrade bicycle 40 Lower pavement markings and signing in Short-term Sugarloaf Key the vicinity of the Harris Channel Bridge Requires coordination with 41 Lower Conduct a lighting study at US-1 Mid-term stakeholders as well as Florida Sugarloaf Key and Bay Point Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Lower Repair the pedestrian bridge IRequires coordination with 42 Sugarloaf Key between Lower Sugar Loaf and Bay Mid-term FDOT Maintenance and Point Structures Offices 13 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a feasibility study to 43 Lower determine potential intersection Mid-term Sugarloaf Key improvements at US 1 and Sugarloaf Road . Conduct a study to determine 51 Cudjoe Key appropriate signs and locations Short-term along the bike lanes near MM 22 Conduct a feasibility study to install Summerland the missing sidewalk between the Potential R/W and 57 Key Boy Scout Camp at Kemp Bridge Mid-term environmental impacts and Caribbean Drive (on the south side of US 1). Review and identify potential pedestrian and bicycle 61 Big Pine Key signing/pavement marking Short-term improvements along US 1 in the vicinity of Key Deer Boulevard. Conduct a feasibility study for an 62 Big Pine Key I acceleration lane in the southbound Mid-term Potential environmental impacts direction on US 1 at Ships Way Conduct a feasibility study for IRequires modifications to the 63 Big Pine Key roadway widening to 4 lanes along Long-term Monroe County Comp Plan US 1 from North Pine Channel Policies Bridge to 1 st Street May require modifications to the Conduct a feasibility study to Monroe County Comp Plan 64 Big Pine Key extend Frontage Road (Avenue A) Long-term Policies. The extension of this from Ships Way to Cunningham frontage road could serve Lane adjacent properties and remove traffic from US 1 Conduct a planning study to Requires coordination with evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n- stakeholders, municipalities, Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, transit agencies. Land 65 Big Pine Key micro transit, bike sharing, and/or Long-term acquisition may be required for scooter-sharing services to provide a park and ride facility. first/last mile connections to Coordinate with Key West complement public transit Transit regarding the Final Mile Grant ... Conduct a planning study to I Environmental, right-of-way, and 66 Big Pine Key determine the need for and Long-term community impacts will require feasibility of a bypass bridge on the extensive research and/or south side of Big Pine coordination Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and 77 Marathon pavement marking improvements Short-term along US 1 in the vicinity of the signalized intersections in Marathon. 14 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a turn lane warrant study Potential R/W and access 78 Marathon I at the intersection of US-1 and 33rd Short-term impacts Street Conduct a feasibility study to add a "NO U-TURN" sign for SB left-turn traffic to reduce conflicts with Potential access impacts; may 79 Marathon Iwestbound right-turn traffic at the Short-term require public involvement intersection of US-1 and Sombrero Beach Road Conduct a feasibility study to 80 Marathon restrict traffic to a "RIGHT TURN Short-term Potential access impacts; ONLY" at the intersection of US-1 requires public involvement and Aviation Boulevard/72nd Street Assess the existing street lighting in 81 Marathon Marathon and implement repairs as Short-term necessary Conduct a study to determine the Potential R/W and access 82 Marathon feasibility of widening bike lanes in Mid-term management impacts; requires Marathon public involvement Conduct an Access Management Potential access impacts; 83 Marathon I study along US 1 from 15th Street Mid-term requires public involvement S. to Aviation Boulevard ..._ .... .... ... .... Conduct a study to determine the j 84 Marathon I location and need for a traffic signal Mid-term or pedestrian crossing on the south end of Marathon Coordinate with Miami-Dade Transit requesting a possible Monroe County has started 85 Marathon extension of MDT Route 301 to the Mid-term I discussions with MDT regarding south end of Marathon. this FDOT is currently conducting a PD&E study for replacement of the 86 Marathon Seven Mile Bridge. Coordinate with Long-term FDOT to request that pedestrian/bicycle features be added on the new bridge Conduct a feasibility study to widen Requires modifications to 87 Marathon US 1 from 11th Street Ocean to Long-term Monroe County Comp Policies; 15th Street potential access impacts; requires public involvement Conduct a planning study to IRequires coordination with the evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n- stakeholders. Land acquisition Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, I Imay be required for a park and 88 Marathon micro transit, bike sharing, and/or I Long-term ride facility. Coordinate with Key scooter-sharing services to provide IWest Transit regarding the Final first/last mile connections to IMile Grant complement public transit 15 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation I Additional Schedule Comments/Information FDOT is evaluating a request for an 102 Islamorada at-grade pedestrian crosswalk at Short-term Founders Park ..... ... .... .... ... .................................................... .... .... ... ..._ . Requires coordination with 103 Islamorada Conduct a lighting study along US 1 Mid-term stakeholders as well as FPL and in the vicinity of Founders Park Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ... Conduct an Access Management Study along US 1 between MM 77 and 83 to determine the need for Requires coordination with 104 Islamorada turn lanes and/or other access Mid-term stakeholders and public management improvements. Also, review the possibility of acceptance improvements to the Old Highway to better serve as a frontage road Requires coordination with Conduct a lighting justification study stakeholders as well as FPL and 105 Islamorada in Upper and Lower Matecumbe Mid-term Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Conduct a study to determine 106 Islamorada methods to reduce speeding and Mid-term related crashes South of Robbie s Marina (MM 72-MM 73) Conduct a feasibility study to identify potential improvements for SR 4A in Plantation Key, so it can be used as an alternate route Potential right-of-way impacts. 107 Islamorada during peak hours, incidents, or Long-term Requires coordination with during lane closures. Also, identify stakeholders and public improvements at critical acceptance intersections to provide access to/from US 1 Conduct a planning study to evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n- Requires coordination with the Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, stakeholders. Land acquisition may be required for a park and 108 Islamorada micro transit, bike sharing, and/or Long-term scooter-sharing services to provide ride facility. Coordinate with Key first/last mile connections to West Transit regarding the Final complement public transit Mile Grant Conduct an intersection study to evaluate the feasibility of improving the transition area (2 to 4 lane May require modifications to the 116 Plantation Key I Mid-term Monroe County Comp Plan transition) near the intersection of US 1 and Royal Poinciana Policies Boulevard Conduct a study to determine the I Requires coordination with 117 Plantation Key feasibility for installing bike lanes IMid-term stakeholders and public along the Old Highway in acceptance. Potential right-of- Islamorada way impacts 16 Ref# Key I Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a study to determine 118 Plantation Key appropriate intersection Mid-term improvements at the US 1/Seminole Boulevard intersection. Conduct a planning study to determine the need for and Environmental, right-of-way, and 182 Upper feasibility of a bypass bridge Long-term community impacts will require Matecumbe between the Snake Creek Bridge extensive research and/or and Tea Table. coordination ... ..................................................... . .... .... ... ... .. Conduct a study to determine 120 Tavernier appropriate intersection Mid-term improvements at the US 1/Sunshine Boulevard intersection. Evaluate the need for pedestrian 121 Key Largo signage at the US-1 and Ocean Short-term Bay Drive intersection 122 Key Largo Trim trees to improve sight distance Short-term for vehicles on Samson Road Evaluate the need for appropriate signage to alert drivers of the 123 Key Largo southbound lane drop along US-1 Short-term from Sunset Blvd to Buttonwood Drive Conduct a study to determine 124 Key Largo methods to reduce speeding and Short-term related crashes between MM 99 and MM 106 Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and pavement marking improvements 125 KeyLargo along US 1 in the vicinity of the Short-term g Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Avenue, Laguna Avenue, Holiday Boulevard and Magnolia Street intersections in Key Largo. Conduct a feasibility study to Potential right-of-way impacts; 126 Key Largo reconfigure the intersection of US-1 Mid-term requires coordination with at Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Avenue stakeholders and public acceptance Conduct a safety study for intersection improvements at US-1 Review potential relocation of 127 Key Largo and Laguna Ave (Potentially Mid-term HAWK north of Laguna Avenue relocate adjacent midblock crosswalk to Laguna Avenue) Conduct a study for intersection 128 Key Largo improvements at US-1 and Tarpon Mid-term Basin Drive .... ... ... .... . 17 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct an access management Potential access management 129 Key Largo study along US-1 from Andros I Mid-term impacts; requires public Road to Summerland Road acceptance Conduct a study to determine potential intersection improvements Requires coordination with 130 Key Largo at US-1 and CR 905, including bike Mid-term stakeholders and public lane continuity through the involvement. Potential right-of- intersection way impacts Conduct a planning study to IRequires coordination with the evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n- municipalities. Land acquisition Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, may be required for a park and 131 Key Largo micro transit, bike sharing, and/or I Mid-term ride facility. Coordinate with Key scooter-sharing services to provide IWest Transit regarding the Final first/last mile connections to IMile Grant complement public transit ---------------------------- Conduct a feasibility study for Coordinate with FDOT regarding 132 Key Largo signal modifications at the Mid-term previous studies/findings at this intersection of US-1 and Woods location Avenue Conduct a corridor study to 133 Key Largo determine the need for a traffic Mid-term signal along US 1 between Avenue B and Avenue A Conduct a feasibility study for 134 Key Largo signal modifications at the Mid-term pedestrian signal south of the Key Largo Elementary School Requires coordination with 135 Key Largo Conduct a lighting justification study Mid-term stakeholders as well as FPL and on US 1 from MM 103 to MM 106 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Conduct a Sidewalk Feasibility Requires coordination with local 136 Key Largo Study along Atlantic Avenue from Mid-term government agencies US-1 to Key Largo Community Park Conduct an intersection study at 149 North Key CR 905A and CR 905 to determine Mid-term Largo I appropriate signing and marking improvements to enhance visibility Conduct a lighting study on Bay Requires coordination with 152 Multiple Point and Big Coppitt Key near bus Mid-term stakeholders as well as Florida stops Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Coordinate with FDOT D6 on Conduct a study to assess the the upcoming deployment of the 153 Multiple future needs of connected vehicle Mid-term Keys COAST project to review systems in Monroe County the infrastructure being installed through this project and. 18 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information consider this information to develop future needs --------------- Requires coordination with Conduct a detailed study to FDOT and Federal Transit 154 Multiple evaluate the feasibility of a water Mid-term Administration as well as taxi between Stock Island and Key potential private partnerships West with local marinas and/or water taxi operators Conduct a detailed study to Requires coordination with evaluate the feasibility of Water FDOT and Federal Transit 155 Multiple Ferry Service from Miami to Key Mid-term Administration as well as West potential private partnerships (i.e. with water ferry operators) Conduct a study to identify gaps in Coordinate with FDOT; potential 156 Multiple ITS coverage (cameras and DMS) Mid-term R/W impacts for incident management purposes Conduct a feasibility study to determine locations for Transit Requires coordination with 157 Multiple Signal Priority. These Mid-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, improvements will help reduce and City of Key West delay to transit vehicles Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of implementing active traffic management strategies such as ITS Infrastructure, TSM&O Requires coordination with Workstations in the Monroe County Monroe County Sheriffs, 158 Multiple Sheriffs Office; extend Road Mid-term IEmergency operations office, Ranger Services into Monroe, and FDOT maybe as a pilot program focusing on high crash locations; explore the use of Big Data, Digital Twinning, and/or Al Tools Coordinate with the Monroe County Sherriffs Department to recruit 160 Multiple Certified Traffic Homicide Mid-term Investigators (THI) in Monroe .. County Conduct a study to evaluate the Coordination with FDOT, Naval feasibility of implementing Aerial Base, Key West Airport, 161 Multiple Taxi s/Ve rti ports/eVOTL within Mid-term Marathon Airport, FAA and Monroe County private air taxi operators; requires public involvement Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of improving bus stop Requires coordination with 162 Multiple amenities such as shelters, Wi-Fi, Mid-term FDOT, Key West Transit, and bike racks, seating, lighting, driver Miami-Dade Transit; potential notification push buttons, etc. along R/W impacts us 1 19 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct an evaluation study to Requires coordination with 163 Multiple prioritize locations that need bus Mid-term FDOT, Key West Transit, and bays. Bus bays for 15 locations are Miami-Dade Transit; potential already funded through FDOT right-of-way impacts Key West Transit is exploring 164 Multiple options for the installation of an I Key West Transit Automated Vehicle Location (AVL) is Evaluating system for buses Key West Transit is developing an Key West Transit 165 Multiple enhanced transit app that will provide additional payment options j is Evaluating Conduct a feasibility review to add 172 Multiple additional bus stops in Long Key Mid-term Requires coordination with and near Angler's Park in Key Miami-Dade Transit Largo. Develop a Mobility On-Demand Consider the Key West Transit 166 Multiple Application to assist users with trip Long-term application and AVL system as planning and mobility options along part of this study US 1 ..............r ... .... .... .... .................................................... .... .... ... ... . Evaluate the feasibility of implementing Automated Buses. Conduct a Roadway Readiness Analysis Study to identify Requires coordination with 167 Multiple infrastructure and system needs to Long-term transit agencies and public support automated buses. Two potential areas: Stock Island to acceptance Marathon or the proposed connector between the Mobility Hub and Key West Coordinate with FDOT for the 168 Multiple implementation of Electric Vehicle Long-term Infrastructure (Charging stations, Smart Power Lane)along US 1 .... Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of providing aerial Requires coordination with gondolas at locations with high stakeholders and public 169 Multiple percentages of short trips (less than Long-term involvement. Land acquisition 3 miles). Potential locations could may be needed for transfer include Islamorada, Stock Island, stations and support structures and Key West ... .... .... .... Conduct a study to determine the locations for and feasibility of Requires coordination with 170 Multiple implementing Queue Jumpers at Long-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, signalized intersection along US 1 and City of Key West These improvements will help reduce delay to transit vehicles .... ... ... ..... 20 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule I Comments/Information Conduct a feasibility study to provide a new bridge between Right-of-way, Environmental Stock Island and Key West (two and Community Impacts will 171 Multiple I Long-term potential options: 5th Avenue to require extensive research Douglas Circle or Projected 13th and/or coordination Avenue to Thompson Island) .... .... ... ..._ . The City of Key West proposed a This is one of the proposed 173 Multiple modified Lower Keys Shuttle to end Long-term improvements in the Key West at the new Key West Intermodal Transit Development Plan Center (2019) ..... .... .... ... ... The City of Key West proposed a This is one of the proposed new Key West Intermodal Center improvements in the Key West 174 Multiple I Transit Connector that will provide Long-term Transit Development Plan service from the Intermodal Center (2019) to downtown Key West ... .... .... ... . Conduct a feasibility study to Requires coordination with 175 Multiple determine locations for Part-Time Long-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, and Shoulder Use by buses along US 1 1 Key West Transit Evaluate the feasibility of unifying multi-agency transit system (KWT & Will require extensive 176 Multiple MDT) with a service operated by a Long-term coordination and interagency single provider agreements Evaluate parking facilities and determine possibilities to provide additional public parking. Consider Requires coordination with the 177 Multiple a Parking Management System to Long-term City of Key West; potential R/W manage parking and provide real- impacts time information to users regarding parking availability Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of extending the current Microwave Backbone into Key Requires coordination with 178 Multiple West. Currently the traffic signals in I Long-term FDOT and City of Key West Key West are connected via cellular and the Microwave back bone ends on Stock Island --------------- Conduct a warrant study for Requires coordination with pedestrian bridges over US-1 at FDOT and Monroe County 179 Multiple school crossings (Coral Shores Long-term Hight School was specifically School Board; requires public mentioned) involvement .... ... ... ..... 21 2 Introduction The Florida Keys are connected to each other and mainland Florida by US 1 (SR 5/Overseas Highway). The Florida Keys are home to several popular tourist destinations. As such, traffic characteristics in Monroe County are unique and traffic volumes vary significantly during different seasons. US 1 serves as the primary roadway providing access to different keys, from Key Largo to Key West. The purpose of the US 1 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) study is to identify transportation needs, goals and objectives and an action plan to meet those goals. This Transportation Master Plan was developed in accordance with Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policies 301.4.1, 301.5.2, and 401.3.1. The study limits include the following roadway segments (see Figure 2-1): • US 1 from the Miami-Dade/Monroe County Line to Roosevelt Boulevard. • North Roosevelt Boulevard from US 1 to White Street • South Roosevelt Boulevard (SR A1A) from US 1 to Bertha Street • Intersection of Card Sound Road and CR 905 • Frontage Roads connecting to US 1 - Old Highway, Plantation Key - Old Highway 4A, Islamorada - Frontage Road along the north side of US 1 in Lower Matecumbe Key - Airport Access Road, Marathon - Avenue A, Big Pine Key - Old Highway 4A, Ramrod Key - Flagship Drive, Summerland Key The following tasks were completed as part of this study: • Gather relevant existing data, such as traffic volumes, crash data, transit information. • Meet with stakeholders to get input on transportation issues, improvement opportunities. • Conduct public meetings to obtain input from the public regarding transportation issues and proposed solutions. • Develop goals and objectives for the US 1 Transportation Master Plan. 22 • Develop projected traffic volumes for the year 2040 and conduct generalized level of service analysis in accordance with the FDOT Level of Service guidelines to identify roadway segment that may need capacity improvements. • Review and analyze the data collected to identify transportation needs and high-level solutions. These solutions include roadway and multi-modal improvements to address the needs of all road users (pedestrians, bicyclists, public transit, and personal automobiles). • Classify the identified solutions into short-term solutions for implementation in the next 1-5 years, mid-term solutions for implementation in the next 5-10 years, and long-term solutions for implementation in the next 10-20 years along with potential funding sources. Evaluation of right-of-way, utility, environmental or other impacts associated with potential solutions and detailed feasibility studies need to be conducted prior to implementation. ,J Sawhom 4, tY Begin at Miami- Dade County Line 41 «q .,,> K'a'1001..11 Kay nx End at US 1 and White Street, Key West rus.u,-ertn KOY Figure 2-1: Project Location Map 23 2.1 Roadway Typical Section / Geometry The study area of US 1 includes both rural and urban typical sections. The land uses along the corridor include a mix of commercial (including professional offices, restaurants, banking/financial institutions, shopping centers, and tourist attractions) and residential properties. A majority of the corridor consists of two-lane undivided roadway with some segments that are two-lane divided, four-lane divided, and four-lane undivided. Details on the typical section limits are provided in the following sections and shown in Figure 2-2. Roosevelt Boulevard is a four-lane undivided roadway. The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) runs parallel to US 1 for much of the study area. Bike lanes also exist along some portions of US 1. Two-lane Undivided The northernmost two-lane undivided segment begins in Tavernier at the intersection of US 1 at Royal Poinciana Boulevard and continues for several miles ending approximately 1,500 feet north of the US 1 and Coco Plum Drive intersection. The next two-lane undivided segment begins at the north end of West Summerland Key and continues for several miles ending at approximately 1,150 feet north of Rockland Drive in East Rockland Key. Two-lane Divided A two-lane divided segment begins at the Miami-Dade/Monroe County Line and continues to the intersection of US 1 and County Road 905. There are passing lanes within this segment. Another two- lane divided roadway segment begins in Marathon at the intersection of US 1 and Coral Drive and ends at the southern end of Bahia Honda Key. A short two-lane divided segment also exists as US 1 enters Big Pine Key, in the vicinity of Long Beach Drive. Four-lane Undivided The northernmost four-lane undivided segment begins in Marathon at the US 1/Aviation Boulevard intersection and continues to the US 1/Coral Drive intersection. The next four-lane undivided segment is along North Roosevelt Boulevard beginning at the US 1/Overseas Highway intersection and continuing to the North Roosevelt Boulevard/Eisenhower Drive intersection. The entire length of South Roosevelt Boulevard is a four-lane undivided roadway Four-lane Divided The northernmost four-lane divided segment begins in Key Largo at the intersection of US 1 and CR 905 and ends at the intersection of US 1 at Royal Poinciana Boulevard. The next four-lane divided segment begins in Marathon, approximately 1,500 feet north of Coco Plum Drive and ends at the intersection of US 1 and Aviation Boulevard. A short four-lane divided segment also exists in Marathon 24 from Crown Point Harbor to 531 Street. Another short four-lane divided segment begins on the southern end of Bahia Honda Key and ends on the northern end of Spanish Harbor Key. The southernmost four- lane divided segment begins at Calle Uno on East Rockland Key and continues to the US 1 and Roosevelt Boulevard intersection on Stock Island. 25 co N s� C15 C15 i 5 cC r � t S`t itr sir rt cn CL s ✓ 11S ( 8 v/ I � t � 9 t� ✓ r ,4i� �t1;t '�, 4 LL 1 4 1y F� 4 S V 3 Data Collection 3.1 Traffic Volumes Based on the FDOT Florida Traffic Online website, US 1 in Monroe County carries an annual average daily traffic (AADT) ranging from 12,700 vehicles per day (vpd) to 51,500 vpd (2019 data). South Roosevelt Boulevard carries an AADT ranging from 11,200 vpd to 13,000 vpd. The AADT data is based on information obtained from the FDOT Traffic Monitoring Sites located in Monroe County. The highest volumes were observed in Stock Island with 51,500 vpd. The Generalized Service Volume Tables provided in the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook was used to determine the 2019 FDOT Level of Service(LOS)for both US 1 and South Roosevelt Boulevard in Monroe County. Based on this analysis, 66 of the 115 roadway segments operate at LOS D or worse. It should be noted that the FDOT LOS estimation procedures provided in the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook are different from those used by Monroe County as part of the Arterial Travel Time and Delay Studies. The FDOT LOS procedure was used in this study, so that future traffic volumes can be reviewed to identify deficient segments. The LOS provided in this report will not be used in making future development review/approval decisions. 3.2 Traffic Signals Within the study area, there are 24 traffic signals, seven emergency signals, six High Intensity Activated Crosswalk(HAWK) pedestrian crossing beacons, three pedestrian signals, two flashing signals, and one drawbridge signal. See Table 3-1 for a summary of the traffic signal locations. Currently all the traffic signals within Monroe County are operated and maintained by FDOT. Table 3-1: Summary of Traffic Signal Locations White Street 1.1 33rd Street 48.5 Florida Street- Pedestrian 1.2 Sombrero Beach Road 50 Signal Eisenhower Drive/Jose Marti 1.3 89th Street- Emergency Signal 51.7 Drive First Street/Palm Ave 1.6 107th Street 52.4 2000 N. Roosevelt Blvd - HAWK 1.7 109th Street 52.5 Sth Street 1.9 121st Street- Pedestrian Signal 53 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 2400 N. Roosevelt Blvd - HAWK 2.1 Sadowski Causeway 53.5 Overseas Market 2.5 Coco Plum Drive 54 3000 N. Roosevelt Blvd - HAWK 2.6 Layton Drive-Emergency Signal 68.4 27 Kennedy Drive 2 7 Snake Creek Bridge-Drawbridge 85 7 Signal ...Searstown...............................................................................................3...........................Woods Avenue...................................................................................................9.0......................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 3618 N. Roosevelt Blvd - HAWK 3.5 Bessie Road 90.5 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3820 N. Roosevelt Blvd - HAWK 3.7 Ocean Boulevard 91.5 .....Roosevelt Blvd at Overseas............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.9 Jo-Jean Way- Emergency Signal 92 Highway ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. College Road 4.4 Fisherman's Trail -Emergency Signal 99.1 Cross Street 4.6 East Drive-Emergency Signal 99.2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... McDonald Avenue 4.8 Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Boulevard 99.5 3rd Street- Flashing Signal 4.9 Bay Drive-HAWK 99.8 Emerald Drive- Emergency 10.5 Tarpon Basin Drive 101 Signal Sugarloaf Boulevard- Flashing 10.5 Bowen Drive-Pedestrian Signal 105 Signal nnn n Crane Boulevard........................................................................19n.5..............nnnnnnnnCRn-905nn-nnEmergency Signal..........................................................106.:.5.................... Key Deer Boulevard 30.3 3.3 Functional / Context / Access Management Classification The FDOT Functional Classification Maps indicate that US 1 in Monroe County is primarily classified as an Urban Principal Arterial with some segments that are classified as Rural Principal Arterials. All of the Access Classifications for controlled access facilities exist along US 1 in Monroe County including Class 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. The most prevalent access class is 4 followed by class 6. Table 3-2 provides a summary of the context classification and spacing standards for each Access Class. 28 Table 3-2: Access Management Standards for Controlled Access Facilities C2 Rural w�Serwice Roads CI Natural, C2 Rural, C2T Rural Town. 03C Suburban CGMnerual f­cm ),�o 3.4 Crash Summary Crash data was obtained from the FOOT Crash Analysis Reporting System for the five-year period from 2014 to 2018. This data indicates that a total of 5,050 crashes were reported including 2.711 property damage only crashes, 2.270 injury onauheu. and 60 fatal onoehau. A total of 72 pedestrian and 153 bicycle crashes occurred during this period, resulting in15 fatal crashes and 193 injury crashes. Approximately 2796 of the total onaehae uoournyd during nighttime and 8% occurred on a wet road surface. The crash data is discussed further in Section 6.1. 3.5 MuNt'modaN Services 3.5.1 Transit Services Curnandy, transit service along the US 1 corridor is provided by Key West Transit, which operates four routes in the Lower Keys and Key West, oa well oe Miami-Dade Transit, which operates one route serving the Upper Keys. Route maps obtained from the Miami-Dade Transit and Key West Tnansitvvebaites are provided in Appendix A. Note: All ridership information presented in the following sections was collected before the onset of the CDV|O-18pandemic. 29 Key West Transit Key West Transit (KWT), a division of the City of Key West Department of Transportation, provides fixed-route bus service within the City of Key West, with limited service to other areas of the Lower Keys. Route maps from the Key West Transit website are provided in Appendix A Based on data from the National Transit Database, KWT provided an average of 761,655 unlinked passenger trips in 2019, a 122% increase as compared to 2015 (342,583 trips). Key West Transit uses standard 29' and 35' buses, two of which have hybrid drivetrains. A review of the ridership data provided in the Key West Transit Development Plan (2019) for each KWT route indicates that the increase in ridership can largely be attributed to the Duval Loop, which is a free downtown circulator that is heavily used by tourists, residents, and employees alike. According to the Transit Development Plan, the Duval Loop accounted for approximately 55% of the ridership in 2018. Lower Keys Shuttle KWT's Lower Keys Shuttle provides transit service beginning at mile marker 55 in Marathon and ending at the corner of Whitehead and Eaton Streets in Old Town Key West with 22 stops, serving 18 different islands throughout the Lower Keys (see Figure 3-1). The Lower Keys Shuttle is the only KWT route that operates outside the limits of Key West and serves as the primary transit link to Mainland Florida through a connection with Miami-Dade Transit's Route 301. This route had ridership of 88,588 in 2018. , Figure 3-1: Key West Transit's Lower Keys Shuttle 30 The Lower Keys Shuttle operates from 5:30 AM to 10:00 PM, with service running approximately every two hours. Between the hours of noon and 2:00 PM, service runs hourly. Scheduled run time for the route varies between approximately thirty minutes, one hour, and two hours, depending on direction and time of day. One-way fare for the Lower Keys Shuttle is $4, with daily, weekly, and monthly passes available and discounted fares provided for students, military members, seniors, and those with disabilities. City Routes Previously, KWT had operated four fixed-route loops throughout the city (Red, Blue, Green, and Orange). Much of this service was overlapping or redundant, and KWT recently simplified these down to two routes, the North and South lines. Ridership data for these routes is not yet available. The North route(see Figure 3-2)connects Old Town Key West with the northern side of the island via N Roosevelt Boulevard/US 1 with the route terminating at Lower Keys Medical Center on Stock Island. wu t m Figure 3-2: Key West Transit's North Route 31 The South route (see Figure 3-3) serves the southern part of the island via South Roosevelt Boulevard with service to Stock Island. Scheduled run time for each route ia around one hour and fifteen minutes. Figure 3-3: Key WestTnmnmit"s South Route Fares for the city nouUaa are $2 per trip with dmi|y, vveaWy, and monthly passes available and discounted fares provided for atudentn, military rnernbere, eeniora, and those with disabilities. Riders that regularly use both services must buy a pass for each. Duval Loop Introduced in 2018. the Duval Loop (see Figmna3-4) is a one-way circulator system serving the Duval Corridor in Old Town Key West. The Duval Loop is a fare-free service with 19 stops in and around Key West Downtown. The Duval Loop has 30-minuta haodvvoya between 6:00AK4 and 0:00AM. with 15-minute headvvoyafronn 9:00AM to midnight. The C}uvo| Loop served 317.320 passengers in 2018, accounting for nearly half of the KWT system's ridership. 32 gaA t tides Figure 3-4: Key West Transit's Duval Loop Circulator Miami-Dade Transit The Dade-Monroe Express, MDT Route 301 (see Figure 3-5), serves as the only public transit connection between mainland Florida and the Keys. Service runs between the southern terminus of the South Florida Busway in Florida City and Mile Marker 50 in Marathon, where riders may transfer to the Lower Keys Shuttle if they wish to travel south of MM 50. Northbound riders can connect to routes running along the South Dade Busway, a dedicated bus corridor operating with the former FEC rail right-of-way. This corridor is currently being upgraded to accommodate Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), as well as local buses, which offers connections to Miami-Dade's Metrorail system. 33 Horne<_Lead }} Y �7 "O �Y �n ern 0 1 Key We,L Figure 3-5: Miami-Dade Transit's Route 301 Dade-Monroe Express 3.5.2 Water-based Transportation Services There are two existing water-based transportation services that operate in Monroe County. The Key West Express provides service between Fort Myers/Marco Island and Key West and the Yankee Freedom provides service between Key West and the Dry Tortugas National Park. Below are brief descriptions of these services: Key West Express The Key West Express is a ferry service from the Southwest Coast of Florida to Key West. Two routes are currently in operation: the first runs between Fort Myers and Key West and the second one runs between Marco Island and Key West. One-way fares range from $40 to $110 with a discounted return service. Both Routes utilize a 170-foot Catamaran with a maximum capacity of 511 passengers. 34 Yankee Freedom The Yankee Freedom is a ferry that provides service between Key West and the Dry Tortugas Nation Park. One-way fares range from $67.50 to $95. The vessel used for this service is a 110- foot Catamaran with a maximum capacity of 250 passengers. 3.5.3 Air Transportation There are two public airports in Monroe County. The Key West International Airport is located in the City of Key West approximately 2 miles east of the main commercial center of Key West. The Key West International Airport serves as the primary commercial service airport in the Florida Keys. Flights departing the Key West International Airport often have weight restrictions due to the runway length. The Florida Keys Marathon International Airport is a County owned and operated airport located in Marathon. The Marathon International Airport currently provides airfield, terminal, and support facilities for air charter/taxi operations, air cargo operations, and general aviation operations. 3.6 Programmed and Planned Projects A review of the FDOT five-year work program revealed that there are several programmed roadway, transit, bridge, aviation, seaport, pedestrian/bicycle, and landscaping projects in Monroe County. A list of these FDOT projects is provided in Appendix B. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Division of Recreation and Parks (DRP), has developed a plan for improvement and completion of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT). The FKOHT runs parallel to US 1 from MM 106.4 to MM 0, traversing a wide variety of surrounding contexts from separate multi-use paths to historic railroad bridges and when no other options are available as the US 1 shoulder. Based on the most current plan (dated August 2018), a variety of improvements are planned to include improving and/or repairing 38 existing facilities and six miles of trail, constructing 22 miles of trail, new shelters/benches, new restroom facilities, new bike repair stations, and new parking facilities. A summary of the improvements included in this FKOHT Plan are provided in Appendix B. 3.7 Resiliency and Climate Change The Florida Keys are susceptible to climate change and sea-level rise. The current US 1 elevation is barely above the sea level (see Appendix C for elevation maps), with many portions of the roadway experiencing flooding from heavy rain fall and extreme fall/spring high tides, known as 35 king tides. As such, the County has implemented multiple resiliency efforts to identify vulnerabilities and provide a work plan to proactively deal with these issues. These efforts include the Green Keys Sustainability Action Plan and five-year work plan and the Monroe County 2013 Climate Action Plan. Monroe County has adopted the Unified Sea Level Rise Projections of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact. This projection estimates the sea-level rise and provides a baseline year of 2000 with a planning horizon of 2120. The projected sea level rise near Key West as provided in this projection is shown in Figure 3-6. The projection considers regional effects, such as thermal expansion from the warming of the Florida Current, that result in differences in Southeast Florida's rate of sea-level rise as compared to other areas in global projections. In addition to the County developed plans and programs, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has developed a plan for coastal storm resilience in the Florida Keys. This study's objective is to reduce the risk of damage to US 1 caused by wave action and erosion associated with coastal storms in the Florida Keys over the 50-year period of analysis. The recommended plan includes the following: • US 1 Shoreline stabilization (revetment) in 6 areas • Nonstructural measures for residential and non-residential structures at risk o Elevation of residential properties (4,697 structures) o Floodproofing of commercial properties (1,130 structures) • Floodproofing critical infrastructure at risk (48 critical buildings) The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners signed a letter of support to show that the County supports the plan and intends to participate in the potential future implementation of the project as a cost-sharing partner with the federal government. In addition to the efforts mentioned above, FDOT is currently exploring options for allocating additional funding and resources to resiliency support services to conduct further evaluation. 36 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection 200 (Southeast Florida Regional Cltimate Change Compact,2019), NOAA IPCC [ C 180 Year Median i Intermediate NOAA High 175 NOAA Extreme inches) High (inches) 1 0 ( (inches) ' - �E 160 ; 0 2040 10 17 21 136 >. — 140 • NOAA High Y > 2070 21 40 54 i a v 120 2120- -40 / Cu 92 136 NOAA 100 92 v 50 Year Planning Horizon Intermediate High v 0 80 ro y 64 / n 60 5r. � �.. 40 .T a 40 40 Observed / IPCC Median 20 5-Year Average 17 Mean Sea Level _. 21 0 10 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 2110 2120 <,,.,,, Year '�zx��}�rl,.1. Figure 3-6: Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Source: Monroe County Website) 37 4 Public Involvement Public and stakeholder input are critical components for any planning process. Initial outreach efforts in a planning process are important to ensure that the public is informed about the purpose of the plan and provided with ample opportunities to contribute "blank-slate" input on where and what types of improvements are needed. This initial outreach was supplemented with another round of public outreach which allowed the public to provide input on potential project-based solutions. 4.1 Public Outreach Efforts The public and stakeholder involvement processes for the development of this US 1 Transportation Master Plan included a variety of communication and outreach means. Due to the ongoing global pandemic, the primary means of engagement with the public and stakeholders for the development of this plan included digital meetings/presentations supplemented by a widely distributed online survey and mapping application provided as part of the project website. Monroe County took extraordinary outreach efforts to ensure that the public outreach meetings are well- attended and that the project website was well-distributed with invitations for the public to directly provide input on the project's development. As a result, a large public input database was developed to categorize and analyze the input received from various sources. The following sections summarize the various outreach efforts used along with a synopsis of major themes noted from the 800 recorded input responses. Summaries of the input received through all outreach sources are provided in Appendix D. 4.1.1 Stakeholder Meeting After kicking-off the planning effort internally with Monroe County's project management team, a meeting with key stakeholders was convened in order to obtain input on: the scope of the project, the proposed public involvement platform options, the proposed public survey questions, project goals, and problem areas to be addressed along US 1 in Monroe County. This initial meeting was held via Zoom on Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 1 PM. Fifty-eight (58) attendees were invited, and 33 respondents actively participated at various points during the meeting. Participants in the meeting included representatives from Monroe County, FDOT District 6, City of Key West, City of Layton, Key Colon Beach, Village of Islamorada, Key Largo Chamber of Commerce, Ocean Reef Chamber of Commerce, Lower Keys Chamber of Commerce, Department of Environmental Protection's Office of Greenways &Trails, Miami-Dade Transit, Miami-Dade County Public Works, and AECOM. 38 Attendees were asked to provide input during the meeting by raising their hands to unmute and speak through Zoom as well as contributing through a menti.com-based participation platform (see Figure 4-1). Questions asked for anonymous response through the real-time menti.com platform included: • What do you see as the top three most critical transportation needs along US 1? • What do you see as critical locations that need improvements along US 1? • What are the top three goals you would like to address through this study? Go to 4 a°wnwrg,!.cowi and use the code 8-;:Gq 41 2 1e.. A Me rViewe, t, Slide the Circle Left or, Right for each Answer j Left = Decrease Right = Increase • Center Stays th Sams �' a If any item is not applicable then hit "Skip" button i Figure 4-1: Menti.com used to conduct surveys during the Stakeholder and Public Meeting Responses to the menti.com questions are provided in Appendix D. Major themes noted from the responses to these menti.com questions include: - Multimodal Opportunities: 38 responses suggesting enhancements to the multimodal transportation network to include bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and water ferry/taxi improvements - Areas of Congestion: 31 responses regarding areas of high congestion/access management issues 39 Infrastructure Resiliency: 10 responses about ensuring resiliency of transportation infrastructure to allow for preservation of the natural environment and designed to withstand severe weather events - Safety: 7 responses about safety and enforcement concerns - Designing to Accommodate Tourists: 11 responses on infrastructure improvements to better accommodate tourists. In addition to excellent participation through the menti.com platform (noting over 100 responses on some questions), the stakeholders also unmuted to ask questions and provided general feedback on the presentation. Of note, several modifications were suggested to the proposed public survey questions, which were incorporated in the final public survey that was posted on the project website. 4.1.2 Public Meeting #1 An initial public meeting was held through Zoom on September 24, 2020 at 5 PM. The purpose of the meeting was to provide background on the project and to seek input from the public on areas and types of transportation concerns. During this meeting, two options were provided for the public to submit input. The first option was to provide real-time feedback through the menti.com survey conducted during the presentation. A second option for the public to participate in real-time was to raise their hands through Zoom to ask questions and/or provide feedback verbally. Another option provided to attendees was to go to the US1 MasterPlan.com website to provide input through the public survey and/or the online mapping platform. Input submitted through the website is summarized in a subsequent section. Questions asked for anonymous response through the real-time menti.com platform included: 1. What are the critical areas that need improvement along US 1? 2. Do you think that the COVID-19 Pandemic will change your future travel patterns (not temporary changes due to COVID-19)? 3. In your opinion, is US 1 currently functioning optimally to satisfy your needs? 4. Based on your vision of how US 1 can best meet your travel needs, what types of improvements do you feel are most necessary/important? 5. What modes of transportation do you currently use? 6. If we were able to invest in improvements to provide alternative means of transportation along US 1, how would your travel patterns change? 7. What do you see as the top five most critical transportation needs for US 1? 40 Responses to the menti.com questions are provided as Appendix D. Major themes noted from the responses to these menti.com questions include: - Multimodal Opportunities: 48 responses noted multimodal concerns, of greatest concern was the need for additional crosswalks (17 comments), bicycle accommodations (6 comments), transit (8 comments), and multimodal accommodations on bridges (7 comments) - Areas of Congestion: 16 responses regarding areas of congestion/access management issues - Others: Other responses noted opposition to a pedestrian bridge at Founders Park (6 comments), a need to design infrastructure for resiliency from natural disasters (8 comments), identifying safety hot spots (4 comments), among others. During the meeting, in addition to participation through the menti.com platform, the attendees unmuted to ask questions and/or provide comments. The comments received verbally during the meeting included: questions regarding the best contact method including the availability of a project website; comments on bicycle safety such as maintenance issues along the bike lanes and narrow bike lanes along bridges; opposition to the pedestrian bridge near Founder's Park; roadway flooding; and possible re-location of the weigh station. A recording of the meeting is provided on the US MasterPlan.com website. 4.1.3 Public Meeting #2 Internet issues during the September 24, 2020 meeting created difficulty for several attendees (or would-be attendees) to participate in the meeting. As a result, a second initial public outreach meeting was held on November 12, 2020 following the same format as the September 24 meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to provide background on the project and to seek input from the public on their areas and types of transportation concerns. During this meeting, several options were provided for the public to submit input. The first option was to provide real-time feedback through a menti.com survey. A second option for the public to participate was the allotment of time at the end of the meeting to allow for the public to raise their hands through Zoom to ask questions and/or provide feedback verbally. The final option provided to attendees was to go to the US1 MasterPlan.com website to provide input through the public survey, online mapping platform, and/or a Contact Us Form. Input submitted through the website is summarized in a subsequent section of this report. Questions asked for anonymous response through the real-time menti.com platform included: 1. Where do you live? 2. Where do you work? 41 3. Do you think that the COVID-19 Pandemic will change your future travel patterns (not temporary changes due to COVID-19)? 4. In your opinion is US 1 currently functioning optimally to satisfy your needs. 5. Based on your vision of how US 1 can best meet your travel needs, what types of improvements do you feel are most necessary/important? 6. What modes of transportation do you currently use? 7. If we were able to invest in improvements to provide alternative means of transportation along US 1, how would your travel patterns change? 8. What do you see as the top five most critical transportation needs for US 1? 9. What are the critical areas that need improvement along US 1? Responses to the menti.com questions are provided in Appendix D. Major themes noted from the responses to these menti.com questions include: - Multimodal Concerns: 17 responses noted multimodal concerns, including the need for additional crosswalks (7 comments)followed by bicycle accommodations (3 comments) - Areas of Congestion: 16 responses regarding areas of congestion/access management issues with suggestions varying in specific content from better traffic signal synchronization to better accommodations for turning and merging traffic - Safety: 8 responses about safety and enforcement concerns - Tourism: 6 responses addressing tourism, with half(3) of the comments suggesting a toll for non-residents, and half (3) of the comments noting a need to modify the design of existing infrastructure to better accommodate the way tourists use US 1. 4.1.4 Website-Based Input: Online Public Survey An 8-question online public survey (see Figure 4-2) was available on the project website US1 MasterPlan.com from September 21, 2020 to February 15, 2021. Through this online platform, 433 respondents submitted feedback about US 1. A full synopsis of the online public survey results is provided as Appendix D. Highlights from the survey results include: - Heaviest participation was from Key West, Islamorada, Key Largo, the Lower Keys, Big Pine Key and Marathon with approximately the same number of respondents living where they work. - Overall, respondents did not expect COVID-19 to impact their future travel patterns after the pandemic is over, with about 23% of respondents stating that they did not use US 1 for commuting purposes even prior to the pandemic. 42 Most respondents (80%) stated that US 1 does not currently function optimally to satisfy their needs. - Respondents overwhelmingly noted the most important types of improvement for US 1 as relieving congestion/improving traffic flow (52%) and reducing crashes (40%). - Automobile was the primary mode of transportation for a majority of survey respondents (86%) with bicycle and walking roughly tied as the secondary mode (39% and 37% respectively). - According to respondents, appropriate investments along US 1 would result in a decrease in automobile traffic (25%) and an increase in bicycle traffic (32%), walking (28%), and riding a bus along the US 1 corridor (22%). - Finally, in identifying the most critical needs for transportation along US 1, respondents were interested in seeing safety improvements (87%), roadway improvements (86%), access improvements (63%), bicycle improvements (62%). Interest in pedestrian improvements, scenic view pull-off areas, public transportation improvements, and water transportation improvements were all around 50%. Major themes noted from the online public survey free responses include: - Multimodal Opportunities: 38 responses suggesting enhancements to the multimodal transportation network to include bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and even water-based transportation options - Areas of Congestion: 31 responses regarding areas of congestion/access management issues - Infrastructure Resiliency: 10 responses about ensuring resiliency of transportation infrastructure to allow for preservation of the natural environment and designed to withstand severe weather events - Safety: 7 responses about safety and enforcement concerns - Accommodate tourist needs: 11 responses on infrastructure improvements to better accommodate tourists. 43 Yo.,,.,-eeao-ac<-ea a,&-,g­ffc ssues Ei:Dnc U3-I:s -;c a .'Ion-oe Cot y to or a fo,TU"--c- FIease --a fo 0' a oje,-t eno,3—E I{'C"Y fl"a:e as aste,'K a.c i'-J'ec -0-d"-0'jo"f" Question 1:' ";ease se,cc-.­e d t'oes,,de-c:,.e sere you live IV Question 2:' F�eAsp ect,v,e a atoe,i ds_�c,:Ops ou work Question 3: Do voi 9 C"A'ge r,m te'-ro'-"y changet cue to CO -"9}7 P,ease sclect a Iroat aoa= &'e esconses: Decrccre Stay t%'e '�CGase Decrease Increase G i eat y S a rr.a Gras-,y Working from home (JI J, Commuting to Work/School along U US-I* Bicycle riding along the US-1 Corridor/the Overseas Heritage Trail* M===NMI Figure 4-2: Sample of the Website Survey 4.1.5 Website-Based Input: Online Mapping Input The public was able to submit location-specific feedback through an online mapping platform (see Figure 4-3) from September 21, 2020 to February 15, 2021. Through this online platform, 113 respondents submitted feedback about US 1. 44 CT — + A s l + r 1� q Project Description __, . I .g,r,,_, _ =.__ _ r_ai`s LF -.. T C'•e'. 1 rom-, I r;f'cr r Y "_t1`* r Figure 4-3: The website served as a critical public engagement tool While having a distinct specific geographic component, the majority of these comments could still be categorized into themes. Major themes noted from the online mapping input include: - Areas of Congestion: 61 responses regarding areas of congestion/access management issues. Of particular note, nine locations were identified for suggested traffic signals/traffic control devices, nine locations were noted for traffic signal synchronization improvements, and 14 locations were noted as needing improvements for turning and merging movements. - Maintenance/Enforcement: 11 comments provided specific locations of maintenance and enforcement issues ranging from speeding to derelict vehicles among others. - Multimodal Concerns: 19 comments were submitted regarding multimodal infrastructure concerns. Comments particularly identified areas that would be appropriate for improved bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, but this platform was also used to note general support for extension of transit and water transportation facilities/services. - Overseas Heritage Trail: Five comments were submitted about completing and providing better access to the Overseas Heritage Trail. - Safety: 17 comments were submitted with locations of safety hot spots, most notably identifying where infrastructure was being misused. 45 Address Tourists Needs: Seven responses addressed tourism, with four comments suggesting a toll for non-residents and three comments noting a need to modify the design of existing infrastructure to better accommodate the way tourists use US 1. 4.1.6 Website-Based Input: Contact Us The final option for public input was the provision of the project team's contact information through the project website, US1 MasterPlan.com. Through this platform, only three responses were received, one email stated that the survey appeared to be geared only towards working people and questioned why. Another response suggested emphasizing reducing vehicle miles travelled by increasing funding for alternative transportation. The final email identified a location where speeding was an issue and requested speed bumps on a local road. All of these emails can be viewed in Appendix D. 4.2 Summary of Input Received from Public Outreach Efforts After analyzing the over 800 unique free response records received through the public outreach efforts summarized above, some key themes surfaced as having prominent and resounding prevalence for the development of this plan. These themes have further influenced the development of the Goals and Objectives for the TMP and are summarized in the following sections. 4.2.1 Create a Balanced Multimodal Network Although survey respondents overwhelmingly rely on their automobiles for current transportation needs, public input revealed that the community has significant interest in utilizing multiple modes of transportation. In relation to US 1 within Monroe County, multimodality includes providing facilities for bicycles, pedestrians, transit, shared commuting, and water-based transportation options. Two hundred fifty-nine (259) comments were received in support of diversifying transportation options through enhancing the infrastructure and services of non-auto modes. Of note: - Fifty-four (54) comments specifically identified bicycle accommodation needs. Most of these requested new infrastructure accommodations, but also noted safety/education concerns. - Also, of note were requests to maintain existing bicycle accommodations and to address abrupt endings of bicycle lanes to merge bicycles more harmoniously with surrounding traffic. 46 Several comments indicated a need for providing space to better accommodate bicycles and pedestrians more safely across bridges. - Ninety-eight (98) comments were received identifying the need for better pedestrian accommodations. Overwhelmingly, the improvements noted were for crosswalks (46), but also noted were needs to widen the sidewalks or accommodate pedestrians on bridges. - A significant number of comments were received in opposition to pedestrian bridges and in particular, the bridge near Founders Park. - Twelve (12) comments were received suggesting shared commuting options to include bikeshare, electric vehicle charging stations, and micro-mobility solutions. - Sixty (60) comments were received in support of transit solutions that ran the gamut of providing a fixed guideway solution, increasing frequency, improving amenities (benches, shelters, etc.), and increasing transit coverage. To a lesser extent, support was noted for electrifying buses and providing park & ride locations. - Unique to the keys, several comments noted support for water-based transportation solutions such as the exploration of public ferry systems or water taxi systems, as well as increased public amenities that support private water-based activities and boat ramp improvements. Also, water-based transportation was commented as having the potential to serve evacuation purposes. One comment received asking for more direct air routes into the Keys. 4.2.2 Address Recurring Congestion Public input responses through the public meetings and the online survey revealed that despite the keen interest in diversifying travel options, automobile use is the most used form of transportation along US 1. As such, a large proportion of comments (246) addressed areas of and suggestions to improve recurring automobile congestion along US 1. Of these comments: - Twenty-four(24) comments identified locations for or generally supported additional traffic signals along the corridor. - In addition to suggesting the addition of signals along the corridor, many (15) comments suggested that signals could be better synchronized throughout the Keys. - Many comments suggested that speed limits were not appropriate along the corridor. Curiously, some comments stated that there was a need to increase speed limits, whereas other comments stated that the speed limits were too high along the corridor. - Of note, eight (8) comments stated that additional space was needed to specifically accommodate merging traffic. 47 Forty-one (41) comments suggested that additional space needed to be provided to accommodate turning movements onto and off of the US 1 corridor. 4.2.3 Enhance Traffic Safety A significant number of public comments (84 comments) noted perceived safety issues along the corridor. - Thirty (30) responses related to safety issues or hot spots were received. - After identification of hot spots, the most common safety comments received indicated that transportation infrastructure was being misused to complete unsafe passing maneuvers (17 comments). - Seven (7) comments highlighted the need to better coordinate traffic in advance of and for community events. - Seven (7) comments were also received noting how signage and pavement markings could be improved towards better communicating traffic conditions and regulations to the travelling public. 4.2.4 Infrastructure and Resiliency A number of free-response comments (44 comments) highlighted the importance of preparing for infrastructure and community resiliency in the consideration of any transportation infrastructure solutions. Of these comments: - Sixteen (16) comments indicated the need to complete, preserve, and/or enhance the FKOHT. - Eleven (11) comments were submitted regarding designing facilities to withstand natural disasters. - Four (4) comments mentioned the need for designs to prepare for sea level rise. - Three (3) comments suggested that infrastructure solutions should consider impacts on natural wildlife. 4.2.5 Balance Impacts of Tourist Traffic with Local Traffic Needs While recognizing the important role that tourism plays in the Keys, many comments indicated that there is a need to better address negative impacts of tourism through transportation solutions. Of these 81 comments, most could be categorized in one of two areas: - A proportion of these comments (23 comments) suggested introducing a toll for non- residents of Monroe County. 48 Of even greater note, 34 comments were received noting a need to accommodate recreational vehicles along US 1. Most of these comments suggested designing "pull-off" sites for motorists to enjoy the scenic view along US 1 without impeding local traffic. It should be mentioned that nine comments were also received in opposition of tourists and tourist traffic altogether. 4.3 Final Public Meeting The final Public Meeting was held on July 14, 2021. The purpose of this meeting was to provide a summary of the analysis conducted during this study and to seek input from the public on potential project-based solutions. During this meeting, multiple options were provided for the public to submit input. The first option was to provide real-time feedback through a menti.com survey during the presentation. A second option for the public to participate was through multiple designated times when participants could raise their hands through Zoom to ask questions and/or feedback verbally. The final option was to submit questions and comments through the Zoom chat, which were answered during designated question and answer session. The questions asked for anonymous response through the real-time menti.com platform included: 1) Any questions/comments on Goal #1 or related objectives? 2) Any questions/comments on Goal #2 or related objectives? 3) Any questions/comments on Goal #3 or related objectives? 4) Any questions/comments on Goal #4 or related objectives? 5) Any questions/comments on Goal #5 or related objectives? 6) Any questions/comments on Goal #6 and #7 or related objectives? 7) Any questions/comments on the potential pedestrian/bicycle solutions presented? Please be specific. 8) Would you support installation of a new traffic signal, if warranted, at the following locations? a) Big Coppitt b) Marathon c) Upper Matecumbe d) Key Largo 9) Would you support a study to determine if additional travel lanes are needed in the following areas? a) Stock Island b) Boca Chica to Big Coppitt c) Big Pine 49 10) Would you support a study to determine if additional turn lanes or a center two-way left turn lane are needed in the following areas? a) Big Coppitt b) Southern Marathon c) Islamorada d) Key Largo 11) Would you support a study to determine if installation of new or modification of existing frontage roads (access roads) are needed? a) Big Coppitt b) Big Pine c) Islamorada 12) Would you support a study to determine if alternative intersections (other than traffic signals) are feasible at the following locations? a) US 1 at N/S Roosevelt Blvd, Key West b) US 1 at Sugarloaf Blvd, Lower Sugarloaf c) US 1 at Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Ave, Key Largo d) US 1 at Card Sound Road, Key Largo 13) Would you support a study to determine if new bridges in the following locations are needed and/or feasible? a) Bridge between Stock Island and Key West b) Big Pine Bypass Bridge c) Islamorada (Snake Creek Bridge to/from Teatable Key) 14) Would you support a study to determine the need for Intra-Island Shuttles in the following locations? a) Big Pine b) Marathon c) Islamorada d) Key Largo 15) If Implemented, how likely are you to use Intra-Island Shuttles in the following areas? a) Big Pine b) Marathon c) Islamorada d) Key Largo 16) Any questions/comments on the potential transit improvements presented? 50 17) Would you support a study to determine the need for and feasibility of automated/driverless buses? 18) Would you support further evaluation of the following potential water-based transportation routes (water taxi or ferry)? 19) Would support a study to determine the need for and feasibility of Aerial Gondola Systems in Monroe County? 20) Would you support a study to determine the need for and feasibility of Air Taxis/Vertiports in Monroe County? A summary of the menti.com questions/comments are provided below and the complete menti.com results are provided in Appendix D. All questions received during the meeting were answered verbally: - A total of 29 free response questions/comments were received - No specific questions/comments were received in relation to the Goals and Objectives. - The pedestrian/bicycle comments received included: requests for additional pedestrian crossing opportunities; questions on what the specific proposed crosswalk locations are and a request for additional trees to provide shade along pedestrian paths. - A comment was received suggesting a pilot program to promote golf cart use along US 1 and/or shared use paths. Additionally, a few responses in favor of and against this suggestion were received. - A couple of comments were received regarding the school zone flashing signal operations during summer months. - A couple of requests for expanded air travel options were received. - Regarding the specific project-based solutions presented: a few comments were received regarding being environmentally conscious and one comment regarding right-of-way for potential roadway widening projects. - Multiple comments regarding enforcement and coordination with Monroe County Sheriff's office were received. - A request for fencing to block motorist's view while entering Key Largo from the 18-mile stretch and help reduce slow moving vehicles on US 1 in this area. - In general, the attendees supported further evaluation of the following potential solutions: o Traffic Signals (All Locations) o Additional travel lanes (Stock Island and Boca Chica to Big Coppitt) o Additional Turn Lanes/Center Two-way left-turn lane (All Locations) o Additional/modified frontage roads (Islamorada only) o Alternative Intersection Configurations other than traffic signals (All Locations) 51 o Intra-Island Shuttles (All Locations) o Automated/driverless buses o Water-based Transportation Options (All Locations) 52 5 Goals and Objectives The primary goal of this Transportation Master Plan is to provide future direction for US 1 in Monroe County. The goals and objectives included in this section have been developed based on a review of the existing conditions, stakeholder input and public input received. Implementation of some goals and objectives will require close coordination with other agencies, including but not limited to: Cities, FDOT, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), the US Coast Guard (USCG), local law enforcement, Tourist Development Council, Chambers of Commerce, Key West Transit, and Miami-Dade Transit. Goal 1 - Create a balanced multimodal transportation system that provides options for and promotes non-motorized travel along the US 1 corridor. This includes providing space and infrastructure for all modes of transportation - Objective 1-1: Construct new and improve existing bicycle facilities. o Notes: Comments about increased interest in bicycling. This includes trails (i.e. FKOHT), bicycle lanes, bike fix-it stations, trailheads, sight distance, and lighting. - Objective 1-2: Improve pedestrian access along and across US 1 through the provision of wider sidewalks and distinct marked crosswalks. o Notes: Comments about inadequate pedestrian crossing options and narrow sidewalks - Objective 1-3: Improve transit options for both commuters and tourists. o Notes: Comments about transit facilities. More support for transit shown at Stakeholder meeting than public meetings/survey. - Objective 1-4: Explore options to provide water-based transportation o Notes: Comments about wanting improvements at boat ramps (i.e. better parking options) and some in support of ferries or water taxis. - Objective 1-5: Evaluate bridges to explore the feasibility of improvements to accommodate all users. o Notes: Comments about issues at bridges for vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians. - Objective 1-6: Allow for travel demand management through introduction/promotion of bikeshare, carpool, and other commuting options. 53 Goal 2 - Address congestion through improved traffic management - Objective 2-1: Evaluate the speed limits at the areas identified through public input to ensure they are appropriate based on FDOT criteria. o Notes: Comments about inconsistency in speed limits and need for additional speed enforcement. - Objective 2-2: Improve management of signalized intersections. o Notes: Comments about adding/removing traffic signals and signal system synchronization. - Objective 2-3: Implement access management improvements with respect to driveways, median openings, turn lanes, etc. o Notes: Comments about congestion and safety issues from unmanaged driveway access, side road access (mostly unsignalized), abrupt stopping (at weigh station, schools, boat ramps, bus stops, and scenic viewpoints specifically). - Objective 2-4: Review and enhance event management procedures to better manage traffic. o Notes: Comments about event related traffic. - Objective 2-5: Develop a coordination plan to enhance inter-agency coordination between the County, Cities, State, etc. to identify and address traffic issues. Goal 3 — Enhance traffic safety - Objective 3-1: Work with FDOT and law enforcement agencies in the identification of safety "hot spots" using a systematic approach and implementation of safety improvements through the "4E" (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response) approach. - Objective 3-2: Maintain shoulders and bicycle lanes to increase their designated use. o Notes: Comments about crumbling shoulders and debris-ridden bicycle lanes, and sight distance issues (landscaping). - Objective 3-3: Improve pavement marking and signage along portions of US 1 that have been identified as areas of concern through the public outreach efforts of this study. o Notes: Comments about sign clutter and people not knowing what to do in certain locations. 54 Goal 4 -Preserve the beauty of the unique Scenic Byway - Objective 4-1: Protect and preserve wildlife needs during the design, construction and maintenance of roadway infrastructure. o Notes: Some comments about nesting sea turtles. - Objective 4-2: Design infrastructure improvements to be resilient to hurricanes and sea level rise. o Notes: Some comments about sea level rise and hurricane issues. - Objective 4-3: Maintain/rehabilitate/replant landscaping after hurricanes. o Notes: Comments about losing important landscaping. Goal 5 - Improve infrastructure to meet the needs of tourists while accommodating local traffic - Objective 5-1: Improve multimodal access to the US 1 corridor and provide associated first/last-mile transportation options, including park and ride facilities, and parking management systems, etc. o Notes: Comments about considering a toll for access to US 1 in the Keys, and better air and water-based transportation options. - Objective 5-2: Evaluate existing and potential infrastructure to provide viewing/pull-off areas at appropriate locations. o Notes: Comments about slow moving vehicles associated with recreational driving. Also, comments requesting designated viewing areas. - Objective 5-3: Improve public awareness through advertising and/or signage to increase use of multimodal facilities by tourists. o Notes: Comments about better communication about the existing multimodal transportation infrastructure. Goal 6 — Preserve/Maintain existing infrastructure - Objective 6-1: Maintain existing pavement through periodic resurfacing. - Objective 6-2: Identify bridges in need of maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement. Goal 7 — Emerging Technology Applications - Objective 7-1: Explore emerging technology applications for transportation in the areas of ITS, Transit, and Signals. 55 6 Existing Conditions Analysis 6.1 Crash Data Analysis Crash data for the five-year period from 2014 to 2018 was obtained from the Department's Crash Analysis Reporting System (CARS). The period from 2014 to 2018 is the most recent five-year period that FDOT has certified as complete. Table 6-1 provides a summary of the crash data received and the subsequent sections provide additional details for each of the FDOT roadway segments within the study area. It should be noted that the crash summaries provided below are based on raw crash data received from FDOT, no manual correction of crash types or review of crash reports was completed. Crash summary tables for each roadway segment are provided in Appendix E. 56 \' +-' o -0 5 ti LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o M 6) LO LO � Z N N N N N N y � a� 0 a�i (� a) o non oOO a� CQ� � � O � •�' LL U m � O aa) acu �iQm Q � cA =_ cn a�i a�i aa)) Q � oUi aa)i0 m � i d � -3 0 J � 0 LL U) f0 Q7 LL y N cor NC) 00 m � U N i N 00 _ f(D O) M CO N On r L N U O N co f� _ _00 r M � Cp _ O � r .ri L�f) CO N00 lf) � N � N .a� 3, Q Ma LO m Y O� m OQQ � p-0 w Q L � Q ° � a�i m Q a�°i �0 a) cam: � a � o cQ � mQ ° � a m a�i � Q � f0 m N N ( N co N ' LO m : > L L � r ;a U a .. � y t0 d d t (gyp r Lf) N Cl) ff1 (D° r r N 0 i N r r I` N H p w N r- LO N � N Or N O 00 J � M C 0 .-. s_ co > l0 w a) ,� a) 0 N >+ O .- 0 04 3 G 0 +� -0 � 'a 'O 4O O O m m Q " O t O V O i y L IC 0 3 0 N v `� > ,° c � � = docLU " M0 3oy � Ems 0 0O ° r ° O3 0LZ � Q � = d � 0 " ° Q -0 ° > 3 � r V fn J r O '� fn G> O M E fq E � N m Z � > > m � U G H m H O r N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 07 O O O O O O ----------------------------------- --------------------------------- 0 LO —----------------------------------- LO 00 -0 C) 0) CY) z r m CY) .......... U) aCD c) C,4 70 0 C: m > o C) 00 x LL C-4 LI) LL M L. L) U) M 04 04 0) OD 04 LO CO ............... CY) M -- (D ——I�t —;�: LO CO — W ——— r,- 04 — C\j C\j Lo C,4 -0 M -0 w —— m (1) 04 0 c — _0 M 0 0 - (3) (1) - 3: 60 R -R C/) — I U) (D -a = 0 co _0 a) 4 o = C-D a') L) G9 < g = = a) -0 (D C15 Fn ry ow M M M >-IV co U) ce) > Vie = c w Cl) 0 r- LO M co N N 0 co (M 4) LO CD CR CN CO 04 CD — Q ® / ate E > CO0 / � / 0 L- < 0 0 E IM a 0 LE M In 0 0 > 4- 4' (n a U- 0 0 T-- -0 M o 2 M -W U) M a U- E 0 U 0 000 0 CD CD C*4 CD k CD M CD CD CD 6.1.1 US 1 from the County Line to Caloosa Cove The segment of US 1 from the Miami-Dade/Monroe County Line to the Caloosa Cove Entrance (FDOT Section #90060000) is 38.777 miles long in the northern portion of Monroe County. A total of 2,666 crashes were reported along the segment during the referenced five-year period, with 507 crashes in 2014, 566 crashes in 2015, 613 crashes in 2016, 511 crashes in 2017, and 469 crashes in 2018. These crashes included rear-end (1,266), angle (517), run-off-road (396), and sideswipe (187)crashes.A review of the crash data indicates that"Careless or Negligent Manner" and "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" were stated as the primary contributing causes for 1300 crashes and 478 crashes, respectively. A majority of the crashes appear to be occurring during the afternoon peak periods (3:00 pm to 6:00 pm). Approximately 23% (609 crashes) of the 2,666 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 9% (230 crashes) of the 2,666 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 1,680 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 962 were injury crashes. A total of 24 fatal crashes were reported during the study period. 6.1.2 US 1 SB lanes from Buttonwood Bay to North Ocean Bay Drive The segment of US 1 from Buttonwood Bay to North Ocean Bay Drive(FDOT Section#90060001) is a one-way pair in Key Largo. A total of 111 crashes were reported during the referenced five- year period, with 22 crashes in 2014, 30 crashes in 2015, 15 crash in 2016, 22 crash in 2017, and 22 crashes in 2018. These crashes included angle (35), rear-end (29), sideswipe (25), run-off- road (13), and pedestrian/bicycle (4) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that"Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 28 crashes, followed by "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (26 crashes), and "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (23 crashes). Approximately 21% (23 crashes) of the 111 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 12% (13 crashes) of the 111 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, of the 111 crashes reported, 74 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 34 were injury crashes. A total of 3 fatal crashes were reported during the study period. 59 6.1.3 US 1 SB lanes from Harbor View Dr.to 0.28 miles N. of Valjean Lane This segment of US 1 from Harbor View Drive to 0.28 miles North of Valjean Lane (FDOT Section #90060002) is a one-way pair in Tavernier. A total of 14 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 3 crashes in 2014, 5 crashes in 2015, 1 crash in 2016, 1 crash in 2017, and 4 crashes in 2018. These crashes included eight run-off-road crashes, four angle crashes, and two rear-end crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that "Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 5 crashes followed by "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (4 crashes). Approximately 29% (4 crashes) of the 14 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is slightly lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 14% (2 crashes) of the 14 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is slightly lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 9 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 4 were injury crashes. One fatal crash was reported during the study period. 6.1.4 US 1 from Caloosa Cove Ent. to 0.834 miles S. of Tom Harbor Bridge This segment of US 1 from the Caloosa Cove Entrance to 0.834 miles south of Tom Harbor Bridge (FDOT Section #90050000) is 14.072 miles long and extends from Islamorada to north of Marathon. A total of 145 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 37 crashes in 2014, 28 crashes in 2015, 19 crashes in 2016, 31 crashes in 2017, and 30 crashes in 2018. These crashes included rear-end (60), run-off-road (37), angle (22), and sideswipe (7) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that "Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 62 crashes, followed by "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (17 crashes), "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (16 crashes), and "No Contributing Action" (12 crashes). A majority of the crashes appear to be occurring during the afternoon (12:00 pm to 3:00 pm). Approximately 25% (36 crashes)of the 145 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 4% (6 crashes) of the 145 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 83 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 60 were injury crashes. A total of 2 fatal crashes were reported during the study period. 6.1.5 US 1 from south of Tom Harbor Bridge to Palm Island Avenue This segment of US 1 from south of the Tom Harbor Bridge to Palm Island Avenue (FDOT Section #90040000) is an 11.713 mile segment through Marathon. A total of 712 crashes were reported 60 during the referenced five-year period, with 146 crashes in 2014, 131 crashes in 2015, 162 crashes in 2016, 152 crashes in 2017, and 121 crashes in 2018. These crashes included year- end (211), angle (193), run-off-road (110), sideswipe (58), left-turn (44), and pedestrian/bicycle (43) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that"Careless or Negligent Manner"was stated as a contributing cause for 245 crashes, followed by"Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (200 crashes), "No Contributing Action" (51 crashes), and "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (50 crashes). Approximately 25% (176 crashes) of the 712 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 7% (52 crashes) of the 712 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 410 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 293 were injury crashes. A total of 9 fatal crashes (including 3 non-traffic fatal crashes)were reported during the study period. 6.1.6 US 1 from Palm Island Avenue to Sands Road This segment of US 1 from Palm Island Avenue to Sands Road (FDOT Section #90030000) is 6.872 miles long between Marathon and Big Pine Key.A total of 223 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 45 crashes in 2014, 44 crashes in 2015, 39 crashes in 2016, 38 crashes in 2017, and 57 crashes in 2018. These crashes included rear-end (82), run-off-road (48), angle (30), sideswipe (25), and pedestrian/bicycle (8) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that"Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 98 crashes, followed by "No Contributing Action" (26 crashes), "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (24 crashes), and "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (21 crashes). A majority of the crashes appear to be occurring during the Midday and Evening peak periods (12:00 pm to 6:00 pm). Approximately 27% (60 crashes) of the 223 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is slightly lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 6% (14 crashes) of the 223 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 117 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 97 were injury crashes. A total of 9 fatal crashes (including 1 non-traffic fatal crash)were reported during the study period. 6.1.7 US 1 from Sands Road to MacDonald Avenue This segment of US 1 from Sands Road to MacDonald Avenue (FDOT Section 90020000) is 26.548 miles long segment from Big Pine Key to Stock Island. A total of 679 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 109 crashes in 2014, 130 crashes in 2015, 135 crashes in 2016, 149 crashes in 2017, and 156 crashes in 2018. These crashes included 61 rear-end (252), run-off-road (193), angle (95), sideswipe (39), pedestrian/bicycle (31), and left- turn (28) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that "Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 268 crashes, followed by "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (90 crashes), "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (80 crashes), and "No Contributing Action" (65 crashes). Approximately 30% (204 crashes) of the 679 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is equal to the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 9% (63 crashes) of the 679 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is slightly lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 343 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 322 were injury crashes. A total of 14 fatal crashes were reported during the study period. 6.1.8 US 1 from MacDonald Avenue to Fleming Street This segment of US 1 from MacDonald Avenue to Fleming Street (FDOT Section #90010000) is 4.531 miles in length. A total of 257 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 60 crashes in 2014, 57 crashes in 2015, 68 crashes in 2016, 42 crashes in 2017, and 30 crashes in 2018. These crashes included run-off-road (67), angle (51), rear-end (51), pedestrian/bicycle (37), sideswipe (14), and left-turn (12) crashes. A review of the crash data indicates that"Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 81 crashes, followed by "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (34 crashes), and "Other Contributing Action" (32 crashes). Approximately 29% (75 crashes) of the 257 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is slightly lower than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 5% (14 crashes) of the 257 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, of the crashes reported, 126 were property damage only (PDO) crashes and 129 were injury crashes. A total of two fatal crashes were reported during the study period. 6.1.9 South Roosevelt Boulevard from Fairfield Inlet to Bertha Street This segment of South Roosevelt Boulevard from Fairfield Inlet to Bertha Street (FDOT Section #90003000) is 2.89 miles along the south side of Key West. A total of 243 crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period, with 55 crashes in 2014, 73 crashes in 2015, 70 crashes in 2016, 40 crashes in 2017, and 5 crashes in 2018. These crashes include run-off-road (71), angle (48), rear-end (47), sideswipe (22), and bicycle (21). A review of the crash data indicates that "Careless or Negligent Manner" was stated as a contributing cause for 83 crashes, followed by "Failed to Yield Right-of-Way" (40 crashes), "Failed To Keep In Proper Lane" (27 crashes), and "Other Contributing Action" (24 crashes). A majority of the crashes appear to be occurring 62 during the afternoon (3:00 pm to 6:00 pm). Approximately 33% (81 crashes) of the 243 crashes occurred during nighttime, which is higher than the statewide average of 30% (for all roadways). Approximately 7% (16 crashes) of the 243 crashes occurred under wet road surface conditions, which is lower than the statewide average of 15% (for all roadways). Based on crash severity, 80 were property damage only(PDO) crashes and 158 were injury crashes. A total of 5 fatal crashes were reported during the study period (2014-2018). 6.1.10 Fatal Crash Summary Based on the crash data obtained from FDOT, a total of 69 fatal crashes were reported during the referenced five-year period with 10 crashes in 2014, 14 crashes in 2015, 22 crashes in 2016, 12 crashes in 2017 and 11 crashes in 2018. The primary crash types included pedestrian (12), fixed object (11), angle (10), head-on (8), and bicycle (6) crashes. See Figure 6-1 for a summary of fatal crashes by crash type. Approximately 49% of the fatal crashes occurred during nighttime and approximately 6% occurred on a wet road surface. A review of these crashes by day of week revealed that more than half of the fatal crashes (approx. 57%) occurred on weekends (Friday, Saturday, and Sunday). GIS maps were prepared to identify the locations where the fatal crashes are occurring. The primary fatal crash locations included Key West (14), Key Largo (11), Islamorada (11), and Marathon (10). The fatal crash location maps are provided in Appendix E. 63 Fatal Crash Summary E Pedestrian Fixed Object r Angle Head On 1 Others zf4J1)t)(f rtiii "Bicycle ■Rear End N Left Turn OVertUrn/ROl lover Mpv ■Other Non-Collision s E Fell/jumped from Motor Vehicle Figure 6-1: Fatal Crash Type Summary 6.1.11 FDOT High Crash List Locations Each year FDOT analyzes the crash data and develops High Crash Lists for both intersections and segments that are experiencing higher than average crash rates. These High Crash Lists are used by FDOT to evaluate and identify locations for safety improvements. The FDOT District 6 High Crash Lists for the years 2014 to 2018 were reviewed to identify high crash locations within Monroe County. Also, GIS based maps were prepared to show these locations on an aerial map. Table 6-2 and Table 6-3 provide a summary of the High Crash Intersections and Segments, respectively. The High Crash Maps are included in Appendix E. Table 6-2: Summary of FDOT High Crash Intersections Number of Crashes Intersection with US 1 - - - - - 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Spur from CR 905 8 CR-905 8 Samson Road 9 Tarpon Basin Drive 15 24 14 16 Holiday Inn 10 10 64 Number of Crashes Intersection with US 1 - - - - 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 S. of Holiday Inn 11 Laguna Avenue 10 South of Laguna Avenue 10 10 North of Ocean Bay Dr/Atlantic Ave 16 SB Spur to Ocean Bay Drive 10 15 Ocean Bay Drive 9 11 East Dive 8 N. of Harbor Drive 9 North of Bell Road 9 Bell Road 9 Second Avenue 8 Cuda Lane 8 Mangrove Avenue 8 Spur from Burton Drive 15 11 8 14 8 Burton Drive 15 10 8 14 8 Between Oleander Dr. and Burton Dr. 11 16 10 North of Ocean Blvd 21 Ocean Blvd/Tavernier Towne 20 Royal Poinciana 9 11 Fontaine Drive 8 10 Coral High School/Woods Ave 11 Venetian Blvd. 8 NB Weight Station off ramp 8 8 N. Hammock Drive 11 18 South Hammock Road 17 8 Wet Net Villas 8 Second Avenue 8 College Road N. 11 MacDonald Avenue 9 9 Spur to MacDonald Avenue 13 10 Cross Street 10 16 College Road S. 16 13 21 Hyatt Entrance 12 Tn Lane for S Roosevelt 18 27 Turn Lane for US 1 25 65 Number of Crashes Intersection with US 1 - - - 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Kennedy Drive 25 S. Roosevelt Blvd. South of US 1 22 S. Roosevelt Blvd. and Seaside Drive 12 Table 6-3: Summary of FDOT High Crash Segments Intersections with US 1 Number of Crashes Beginning Point Ending Point 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ocean Drive Seafarer Resort 9 Ocean Drive Rock Reef Resort 10 South of Everglades National South of Harbor Drive 8 Park North of Avenue B South of Tarpon Basin Drive 20 Samson Road Calusa Street 20 North of Avenue B South of Tarpon Basin Drive 26 Tarpon Basin Drive Hibiscus Lane 20 Buttonwood Drive North of Bay Drive 18 North of Atlantic Boulevard South of the CVS driveway 10 North of Ocean Bay South of Fishermans Trail 24 Drive/Atlantic Ave South of East Drive South of Harbor Drive 18 Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Ave North of Harbor Shores Road 27 Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Ave North of Harbor Shores Road 25 South of Estall Street North of Key Largo Station 23 13 North of First Ave North of Bahama Road 13 South of Second Avenue South of Estall Street 13 South of Second Avenue South of MM 98 10 North of Peter Pan Pkwy South of Poisonwood Rd 9 Camelot Drive Garden Street 10 North of Burton Drive South of Garden Street 17 South of Camelot Drive South of Garden Street 24 South of Burton Memorial Julep Road 19 Church South of Burton Memorial Harborview Drive 27 Church North of Royal Poinciana South of Fountaine Drive 9 Blvd 66 Intersections with US 1 Number of Crashes Beginning Point Ending Point 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 North of Royal Poinciana South of Woods Avenue 12 Blvd North of Fontaine Dr South of Woods Avenue 15 South of Whale Harbor North of Russell St 28 Channel North of Sombrero Beach Rd 53rd Street 18 Palm Island North of 12th St 9 Walgreens Wilder Road 14 S. MacDonald South of Cross Street 11 S. MacDonald College Road S. 30 25 Hyatt Entrance S. Roosevelt Ave/A1A 33 18 Hyatt Entrance TN Lane from S Roosevelt 18 16 South of Florida street North of Watson Street 18 S. Roosevelt Blvd. at Bertha S. Roosevelt Blvd. south of 8 10 Street La Brisa 6.1.12 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Analysis The following is a summary of findings from the pedestrian/bicycle crash data analysis: 1 A total of 225 pedestrian/bicycle crashes (72 pedestrian and 153 bicycle) were reported during the referenced five-year period (2014 to 2018), with 41 crashes in 2014, 62 crashes in 2015, 53 crashes in 2016, 39 crashes in 2017, and 30 crashes in 2018. 2 Approximately 60% of the pedestrian crashes occurred during non-daylight conditions. See Figure 6-2 for crash distribution by lighting conditions. 3 Most of the bicycle crashes (81%) occurred during daytime, with 19% of the bicycle crashes occurring during non-daylight conditions. See Figure 6-2 for crash distribution by lighting conditions. 4 Approximately 90% of the pedestrian/bicycle crashes resulted in injuries or fatalities (84% injury crashes and 6% fatal crashes). 5 Based on the crash distribution by time of day, the highest number of pedestrian crashes occurred between 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM and the highest number of bicycle crashes occurred between 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM. Figure 6-4 and Figure 6-4 show the distribution of crashes by time of day. 67 6 Based on the crash distribution by day of week, bicycle crashes appear to be occurring throughout the week (including weekdays as well as weekends), but most (54%) of the pedestrian crashes occurred during the weekend (Friday through Sunday). 7 Based on a review of the GIS crash cluster maps provided in Appendix E, higher concentrations of pedestrian/bicycle crashes appear to be occurring between MM 0 to 5 in Key West, MM 48 to 50 in Marathon, and between MM 99 and 100 in Key Largo. Pedestrian Crashes by Lighting icyclo Crashes by Lighting Condition Condition 1°!0 �or 3% Daylight m Dusk Dawn m Dark Daylight m Dusk Dawn m Dark Figure 6-2: Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Data by Lighting Condition Pedestrian Crash Distribution by Time of Day 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 .G9° a0° .°° .°° Figure 6-3: Pedestrian Crash Data by Time of Day 68 Bicycle Crash Distribution by Time of Day 20 15 10 5 0 Figure 6-4: Bicycle Crash Data by Time of Day Pedestrian Crashes by Day of Week 20 16 15 12 14 10 9 9 7 5 5 0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Bicycle Crashes by Day of Week 35 29 30 25 19 24 23 21 24 20 15 13 10 5 0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Figure 6-5: Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Data by Day of Week The following is a list of areas experiencing high bicycle and pedestrian crashes and potential improvements that may help to improve safety in these areas. Approximately 60% of the pedestrian crashes occurred during non-daylight conditions. Lighting conditions at all of the location discussed below should be reviewed for potential lighting enhancements. Key West The highest number of both pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur on US 1 in Key West. The segment between approximately Jose Marti Drive and Glynn R. Archer Jr. Drive and the segment of South Roosevelt Boulevard from Flagler Avenue to US 1 have the highest incidence of bicycle 69 crashes. In addition, US 1 from Mile Post(MP) 0.00 to Jose Marti Drive, and from Glynn R. Archer Jr. Drive to the intersection of North Roosevelt Street and US 1 shows a cluster of bicycle crashes. MP 0.00 to Jose Marti Drive This two-lane segment of US 1 is constrained by adjacent commercial and residential land uses. Travel lanes are 11 feet wide with narrow sidewalks with obstructions, such as light posts. There are sharrows on the pavement, indicating shared use of the travel lanes by motorists and non- motorists. This segment of US 1 is experiencing a higher incidence of pedestrian crashes, likely due to high pedestrian activity, including tourists. Additional high-visibility signage and markings could help in raising awareness of shared use on the roadways, especially for a driver or tourist unfamiliar with the area. Jose Marti Dr to Roosevelt Boulevard This segment of US 1 is generally five lanes, with two-lanes in each direction, sharrows in the outside lanes and a bidirectional turn lane, which in some areas is striped as a dedicated left turn into adjacent properties. There are no designated bike lanes on the road so bicyclists must share the lane or use the sidewalk. A desktop review indicates an eight-foot sidewalk on the north side of the road, immediately adjacent to the water, and a six-foot sidewalk on the south side of the road. Since widening the road would not be feasible in this section due to the shoreline immediately adjacent to the north side of the road and commercial properties along the south side of the road, it may not be possible to restripe the roadway to provide bike lanes. It may be possible to widen the sidewalk on the south side of the road to accommodate more shared use. However, with the high traffic congestion and unrestricted access to adjacent properties, attracting more bicyclists to the sidewalk could lead to more conflicts between bicycles and turning vehicles. Therefore, a detailed study is suggested to determine potential pedestrian/bicycle safety improvements. The segment of roadway just north of Sigsbee Road shows a higher rate of pedestrian crashes. It may be advantageous to install additional mid-block crossings in addition to those already existing along this segment of US 1 where adjacent land-uses generate pedestrian activity. Flagler Avenue to US 1 The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail runs parallel to this segment on the east side of the road. However, there are no turn lanes on this four-lane, undivided roadway, and there is no refuge for pedestrians/bicyclists to cross the street. Midblock crossings or additional high-visibility signage could help in alerting motorists to the presence of bicyclists and pedestrians. 70 US 1/Roosevelt Boulevard Intersection This signalized intersection experiences heavy congestion. There are free flow right turn lanes with pedestrian actuated signals, that can stop vehicular traffic to allow pedestrians to cross. Signing and marking enhancements (such as FYG pedestrian crossing signs, green-colored pavement in marked bicycle lanes and in extensions of bicycle lanes through intersections and other traffic conflict areas) can be installed to improve pedestrian/bicycle safety. Alternatively, a roundabout or other type of alternative intersection can be evaluated at this location to improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Roosevelt Boulevard to MacDonald Avenue High visibility signing and markings would increase visibility of and safety for bicycles and pedestrians at the intersection of US 1 and College Road and the intersection of US 1/McDonald Avenue. Signing and marking enhancements (such as FYG pedestrian crossing signs, green- colored pavement in marked bicycle lanes and other traffic conflict areas) can be installed to improve pedestrian/bicycle safety. Boca Chica Key Saratoga Avenue to Boca Chica Road Bicycle crashes on this segment occurred at intersections. US 1 experiences congestion in this area, and bicycles and vehicles may come into conflict. High visibility signing and markings at the intersections and green bike lanes at the conflict areas would increase visibility of and safety for bicycles and pedestrians. Big Pine Key The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail runs parallel to and north of US 1 for the majority of Big Pine Key. There are recorded bicycle and pedestrian crashes just south of Key Deer Road around the commercial land uses that may generate pedestrian activity. With Key Deer Boulevard as the only signalized intersection in this area, higher visibility signing/markings, and signal improvements would increase visibility of and safety for bicycles and pedestrians. Marathon Bicycle crashes are distributed along US 1 within Marathon. The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail runs parallel to and north of US 1 along this segment, so crashes are likely due to bicyclists and/or pedestrians wishing to turn and cross the road. Parking within the FDOT right of way could introduce additional conflicts that would be eliminated if the right of way was clear. High visibility 71 signing and markings at the intersections would increase visibility of and safety for bicycles and pedestrians along with potential mid-block crosswalks. Key Largo There is a cluster of bicycle crashes at the intersections of US 1 with Ocean Bay Drive, Atlantic Avenue, Laguna Avenue, Holiday Boulevard and Magnolia Street. The intersections at Ocean Bay Drive, Atlantic Avenue and Laguna Avenue are irregular, which may contribute to driver confusion. These intersections could benefit from intersection reconfiguration, signal improvements and high visibility signing/markings. Summary The areas listed above are not the only areas on US 1 in Monroe County experiencing bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Throughout the Keys crashes have been recorded with bicyclists and pedestrians. Upgraded signing and pavement markings at signalized and unsignalized intersections, and signal timing improvements at signalized intersections would increase safety for all modes of transportation in Monroe County. 7.1 Field Reviews Field reviews were conducted at three intersections in Stock Island to observe traffic conditions during the peak traffic season (March 2021). The following is a summary of the findings by location: 7.1.1 Roosevelt Blvd, College Rd South, & Cross Street • During the PM peak period, the northbound queues appear to stem from the Cross Street intersection, with heavy traffic through Roosevelt Boulevard. Northbound traffic north of Cross Street was relatively lighter, with minimal queues at MacDonald Avenue. — Northbound queues from Cross Street extended into the College Road intersection during several cycles observed. — Northbound queues from College Road extended past the Cow Key bridge but not all the way into the Roosevelt Boulevard intersection. — Left-turn queues on eastbound Roosevelt Boulevard (to go north on US 1)were relatively long, extended almost to the HAWK signal at Capital Bank (2,000 feet). See Figure 6-6. • During the PM peak period, the westbound queues at Cross Street were up to 25 vehicles (see Figure 6-7). Phase failures for this movement were observed. These queues seemed to dissipate after 5:30pm. 72 • During AM peak, northbound left-turn traffic at College Road was noticeably higher than during the PM peak period. The permissive capacity was minimal due to heavy southbound traffic. Maximum queue observed was nine vehicles, which completely filled the available storage area (see Figure 6-8). Some potential solutions that could help address the traffic issues observed include: • Signals within this segment were retimed in 2019, and the 2021 ATTDS found that travel speeds increased.A quick review of the signal timing indicated there are potential opportunities to modify offsets and further reduce travel time and delay. • US 1 at Roosevelt Boulevard — Reconfigure the intersection with triple westbound left-turn lanes or install a roundabout — Modify pedestrian crosswalks and timing • US 1 at College Road South — Modify the northbound left-turn lane taper to increase storage or install dual left-turn lanes • US 1 at Cross Street — Widen Cross Street to provide two westbound lanes • Additionally, widening US 1 to six lanes from Roosevelt Boulevard to College Road North could be considered as a long-term improvement to help address traffic issues. This roadway widening would require that the current Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policies be revised. As such, several alternative transportation options (water taxi, transit, new bridges) were reviewed which are discussed in Sections 6, 7, and 8 of this report. a r, .. ,'ti^Ws per .fit+ M2 3 Figure 6-6: EB left-turn queues from the US 1/Roosevelt Blvd Intersection 73 x g s t t �i� � t ✓d iti fi u s Ab, r a Figure 6-7: Westbound Queues on Cross Street 74 l i r 1� t r� r� Figure 6-8: Northbound left-turn queues at the US 1/College Road South Intersection 7.2 Traffic Forecasting The FDOT Traffic Trend Analysis Tool (Version 03) was utilized to estimate the year 2040 traffic for US 1 in Monroe County based on the historical traffic counts from 2008 to 2019. This tool provides three growth analysis methods including Linear Growth, Exponential Growth, and Decaying Exponential Growth. Linear Growth calculates growth by fitting a straight line to the historic traffic counts with the assumption that traffic grows by the same amount each year. The Exponential Growth methodology applies a constant growth percentage to the previous year traffic to estimate future traffic. Thus, increase in traffic each year is not the same and it increases exponentially over time. Decaying Exponential Growth is used to model growth which is slowing down or declining over time. From the three methods, Exponential Growth typically gives the highest traffic growth and is most suitable for the areas with new developments and no capacity constraints; whereas Decaying Exponential Growth is recommended for areas that are almost build-out and with limited capacities for future development growth. Figure 6-9 illustrates a sample charted Regression Analysis of these three growth methods in a graphical format. 75 Regression Analysis Linear,Exponential,and Decaying Exponential Growth 00 mmum Historical AADT 12 00 Linear Grown, Exponential Growth a ===•Decaying Exponential Growth s tG COO e 81 000 i. ____- -w y Year Figure 6-9: Traffic Trend Analysis Growth Patterns (Source: Traffic Forecasting Handbook 2019) The growth rates from the three methods were compared with each other, as well as with growth rates from other available studies and models, as listed below. 1. Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM Version 8.511): a. US 1 in Monroe County is not coded in the SERPM model. But the growth rates for US 1 external are calculated between the 2015 and 2045 networks. As shown in Table 6-4, the model shows the annual growth rate of 0.5% on this external segment. Table 6-4: SERPM V8.511 US 1 External (South of CR 905A) Model Year Model Volume 2015 30,113 ------------------------------------ 2045 34,919 _2015-2045 Growth% 0.5% 2. Florida Statewide Model (FLSWM Version 7): a. Growth rates for each of the US 1 traffic count stations are calculated between the FLSWM years 2015 and 2045 networks. Annual growth rates vary between -0.07% and 0.6% with an average of 0.25%. Table 6-5 provides details of the FLSWM information. 76 Table 6-5: FLSWM V7 Growth Rates 2015 and 2045 (Directional Traffic) Network A Network B 2015 Model 2045 Model node node Count Site ID Volume Volume Growth 71324 97924 900001 4,852 5,611 0.52% 97924 71324 900001 4,849 5,611 0.52% .... ... 71767 96620 900164 4,814 5,474 0.46% 96620 71767 900164 4,812 5,474 0.46% 71253 71407 900094 5,980 6,590 0.34% 71407 71253 900094 5,980 6,590 0.34% 70850 92230 900064 5,873 6,426 0.31% .... .... ..... .. 92230 70850 -IIIIIIIIIIIII900064 5,877 6,426 0.31% 70508 70509 900062 3,405 3,823 0.41% 70512 70505 905043 3,414 3,866 0.44% .._ . 70455 70499 900102 4,597 4,983 0.28% 70499 70455 900102 4,604 4,983 0.27% 70311 70381 900101 3,570 3,976 0.38% 70381 70311 900101 3,577 3,976 0.37% 69697 69971 900623 2,315 2,729 0.60% . .... ..._. 69971 69697 900623 2,326 2,729 0.58% 69125 69505 900065 1,962 2,292 0.56% 69505 69125 900065 1,973 2,292 0.54% 68305 68407 905040 2,880 3,135 0.30% 68407 68305 905040 2,890 3,135 0.28% 67920 68093 900045 4,638 4,849 0.15% 68093 67920 900045 4,648 4,849 0.14% 67655 67759 900110 3,918 4,188 0.23% 67759 67655 900110 3,927 4,188 0.22% 67478 67560 900642 1,943 2,183 0.41 67560 67478 900642 1,941 2,183 0.42% 66651 67364 -IIIIIIIIIIIII900066 1,727 1,943 0.42% 67364 66651 900066 1,726 1,943 0.42% 64704 64947 900016 1,638 1,849 0.43% 64947 64704 900016 1,639 1,849 0.43% 63978 64458 900227 4,166 4,403 0.19% 64458 63978 900227 4,164 4,403 0.19% 62055 62315 900108 3,682 3,795 0.10% 62315 62055 900108 3,677 3,795 0.11% 58219 59658 900106 4,348 4,476 0.10% 59658 58219 900106 4,346 4,476 0.10% 57876 58219 900010 4,486 4,623 0.10% 58219 57876 900010 4,483 4,623 0.10% 56946 57525 900009 7,431 7,626 0.09% .............. 57525 56946 900009 7,427 7,626 0.09% 77 Network A Network B Count Site ID 2015 Model 2045 Model Growth node node Volume Volume 56642 56734 900165 11,174 11,443 0.08% 56734 56642 900165 11,173 11,443 0.08% .. ..... ..._. ..... 70560 70617 905041 3,902 4,343 0.38% 70617 70560 905041 3,909 4,343 0.37% .... .. ..... ... 70824 91213 905042 5,394 5,913 0.32% 56634 92232 ­1111111111111900105 7,992 8,260 0.11% 92232 56634 900105 7,986 8,260 0.11% 56389 56450 905034 9,602 9,627 0.01% 56450 56389 905034 9,594IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 9,627 0.01% 56190 56213 905004 7,226 7,291 0.03% . .... ..... ..._. 56213 56190 905004 7,219 7,291 0.03% 56634 92233 900049 5,422 5,552 0.08% 92233 56634 900049 5,429 5,552 0.08% 56646 93297 905027 2,290 2,268 0.03% 93297 56646 905027 2,289 2,268 0.03% 93297 93298 905028 1,667 1,632 -0.07% 93298 93297 905028 1,667 1,632 -0.07% .. ..._. .. 3. Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Population Projection: a. Population growth rates for Monroe County is derived from the BEBR projections and for the low, medium, and high growth scenarios. The result shows negative growth of -0.5% for the low growth scenario, and 0.1% and 0.6% for the medium and high growth scenarios respectively. A summary of the BEBR population growth is provided in Table 6-6. Table 6-6: BEBR Population Growth Monroe County 2020 1 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Growth Low 73,200 71,500 69,800 1 68100 1 66,400 64,700 -0.5% Medium 76,300 76,500 76,800 77,100 77,400 77,700 0.1% High 79,300 81,900 84,500 87,000 1 89,200 91,400 0.6% Based on the data gathered from the regional and statewide planning models and BEBR population studies the growth rate for US 1 along the Florida Keys is estimated to be lower than 1%. Due to the low growth rates from the above-mentioned studies, and the issue of road capacity on the bridges along this corridor, the growth rates from the Decaying Exponential Method were selected to estimate the future traffic. The R-squared values of the Decaying Exponential method were checked to measure the fitness of the model to the historical trend, and any of the stations with very low R-squared (less than 10) were subjected to additional 78 analysis and adjustments (this included 9 stations). It was observed that years 2008 and 2009 traffic for these stations with low R-squared were not consistent with the overall trend, and thus they were excluded, and the trend tool was re-calculated using the 2010 to 2019 counts. For two of the stations, instead of excluding the outlier count, the count was adjusted to be the average of all year counts to improve the trend analysis tool. The final individual link growth rates were used to combine segments with similar growth rates and define a longer segmentation, with average growth rates that fluctuate between 0.28% and 0.57%. These growth rates are applied to the 2019 counts to forecast the 2040 projected traffic volumes. Alternatively, based on recent traffic impact studies done for the surrounding area, a second traffic scenario with higher and more moderate consistent growth rate of 1% was also applied to 2019 counts to estimate a higher traffic scenario for the year 2040 for comparison purposes. Table 6-7 illustrates the detailed information of both. The levels of service for the two future traffic scenarios (adjusted Decaying Exponential Growth, and constant 1% Growth)were calculated based on the Generalized Service Volume Tables provided in the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. A summary of these LOS calculations and the FDOT Generalized Service Volume Tables are provided in Appendix F. A review of the analysis results indicate that more than 60% of the roadway segments are expected to operate at LOS D or worse. It should be noted that the FDOT Level of Service (LOS) estimation procedures provided in the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook are different than those used by Monroe County as part of the Arterial Travel Time and Delay Studies. The FDOT LOS procedures are based on traffic volumes whereas the Monroe County LOS procedure is based on travel speed. The FDOT LOS procedure was used in this study so that future traffic volumes can be reviewed to identify deficient roadway segments. The LOS provided in this report are for use in this report only and will not be used in making future development review/approval decisions. 79 :5 al M III M M M n n 00 l0 I', ill 00 Ol Ln MILn M N M N N O Ln M N n al N N M mI;T 'T N m M M N r-I ri r-I N M N r-I ri N N N N M m ;3- LD �T m C O LC OO l O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O w O O O O O O C) O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O _ N w Ol c-I M m 00 rl ri Ln lD Ln lz:� 00 lzt n lz:� Ln 00 Ln N Ln N LD N lD tD m Ln Ln -i t -t LO �T Ln m Ln Ln O O m lD m O m m n O m 00 N � 00 M m 't N m M ri M c-I ri ri N M N ri ri ci N r-I ci N m �t Ln -:I, � N W p LL N O^ L� �' o 0 r i Q aL-+ 0 o 0 0 0 O N o 3 dl LLn � °N° tND O o 2 0 6 6 0 0 N v a) U L w yn F O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � an 4J 3 M 00 lfl m Ln LD Ln 1.0 N l0 lD 00 N O 00 <D l0 00 N O N 00 <D Ql N LD Ql m I- Ln Ln ul m LD Ln `zl: LIl N m ri In N N N N M N M N In N N lD N m fn Li Q M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N L N E _ + _0 -0 (� Lou ate+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 �0 M ri -1 Ln 00 'l, 00 O 01 N M ci 41 al 01 01 * O0 M LD Oq LD M O O O It Q ul I, n LD oo LD ci I, Ln N lzT Ln lD Ln I, m o6 't m N 00 ci ri I, O m N Ln Ln Q to n M L I, M N LD to Ln N M Ln � ri ri N N N lD M M to N Vl to N M ri d LC NNm Lf� � � " t C O QC p O0 O o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o +�+ Ur N m 00 lD M Ln lD Ln LO `� LD M 00 Ol O M t0 LD M N O 00 LD 11 0l Lfi LD Ol m 'L U v i dl n Ln Ln LfI m lD Ln m O m O O M N N ri M N .-I N m N N ri N m m V Lu `1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O, O O O O O O, 0 0 O O O O O 6 0 0 O O O O OD N O C v C N Cfl u v O In O O O O O O Q O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O p M r-I ci Ln oo00 O ^ N ci O O I- Cl 4 W m Ln LD 00 t0 m 00 O O 't +' 6 LIl I� n LO 00 LD c-I I, N Ln O C) al N ri -i I, O N Ln Ln D1 to Ln m I� m N LD l0 Ln `� m `� N O N N LD m 00 lfl N Ln N m ri 2' o 0 o D o 0 o a o 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o L N ri N l0 N al Ln zt O 00 N N Ln Ln m n It n O 00 U) N M O 00 M LO O O O O O ri lzt N to ri N N LO O c-1 lO ri Ln m I, O m a-I M 't Ln I, N M N C tD to Ln N Ln M M O M O N O Oi O ri O O O N r-I ri ri ri N N O1 DJ O C C N O_ X w N -a v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 o D o 0 o D o o D o D o 0 0 0 0 O N LD N O n O M � Ln ri M I� ri 00 I� n ClO O al +L+ p' t0 0) M Ln O Ln LD LD M -t N M N Ql al 00 al O1 Ln N Ln Ln It O Ln N (U Vl l0 Ln al Ln 00 (.0Lo O N ri O O to N �--� M I, N ri N 00 M Ln N N M N t -p O C 3 o D o D o D o D D o D o o D D o 0 o D o D D o D o 0 0 0 0 O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N l0 n N r-I N lD LO n ri Il LD Il 00 r-I 01 Ln M I ri O 1;* M n Ln 00 N LD N 00 F 6 r1 O Ln ID 00 Cl) M O N Ol Ln Ln r1 N 00 al Ln 0) 00 Ol r, ri N M O I- n � M M N rq r-I N N N O r-I O r-I O O, C? O O O ri 0 O O ri ri ri ri ri ri ri N N C C J J �� ci 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � am Ln oo oo tD oo tD -i m LD tD m m Ln a) 00 ^ of Il Oo a N o m v LD o a" M al N M It n -t tO m Ln M O I, al al Ln N Ln Ln m r-I 00 I� to LD Ln al Ln t r, LO lO O N c-I t O O 00 N r-I M ^ N r-I N 00 m Ln N N M N OC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O Z Ln u) Ln O O Ln Ln tD I� Ol O O M 00 al � r-I tD U) O 00 U) Ln O Ln lzt M Ol O O 0) r-I ri ri r-I � N � � a) 0) N Ln 00 Ol 00 00 U) O O ri M ri l0 U N N M N � ri M M M N r-I ri r-1 N N r-I r-I ri ri ri ri ri N N E Ln M A N c 00 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O p O I- Ln O O O 00 Ln Ln N N N Ln O O -1 N M m 1.0 IzT O O Ln lD Ln O O Ln U N r-1 ON N N m ri ON N N 00 Ln c-I O-i r-i N Om0 ri ci � Ln c-I � c-I ON N M N O 00 N ri m [V N r-I M Ln O Ln O N l0 lflN Ol 00 LO O a) Ln ri Ln 0 O OLO 0) t0 � � Izi- lfl O O N (0 -t -t ri t0 ri N O O O ri O La O O M O O N -4 O O O O O O ri ri LO O O O ri to O O N ri ri ri O C) Pa N ri O O is 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln Ln O O O O O Ln O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O Ln Ln N 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 a O 0 0 0 al al m al al al al al al al al al al al al al Cl) al al m al al al al al cl al al al al 7.3 Transit Analysis Bus service currently provides a crucial transportation link along US 1, providing transit access to mainland Florida that connects residents and visitors with employment, retail shops, and tourist destinations. These services are especially helpful to transit reliant populations, such as those without access to personal vehicles. The City of Key West has seen success in recent years using free and frequent service to grow system ridership. However, service along US 1 has not seen these ridership increases. Buses are subject to the same traffic challenges as personal vehicles, which creates delays and does little to encourage growth. While a large-scale transit project such as rail or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)would be neither appropriate nor feasible for the US 1 corridor, there are a number of improvements that could boost transit service when implemented as a system. 7.3.1 Demographic Trends When analyzing potential gaps in transit service, it is important to consider those communities that are most likely to rely on transit for their daily transportation needs. A number of socioeconomic factors can be associated with reliance on transit. This report focuses on two major conditions: households without access to a personal vehicle and households experiencing poverty within the previous year. Individuals in these communities are likely to have fewer transportation options and are more likely to rely on transit. By identifying where these areas are, planners can ensure that transit access is reaching where it is needed. Households without Vehicle Access Whenever a person does not have access to a personal vehicle, they are much more likely to be reliant on transit. Those that do not currently use public transit are much more likely to adopt the service if coverage is provided or improved. As of 2019, approximately 7.9% of households in Monroe County do not have reliable access to a personal vehicle. Table 6-8 shows the ten US Census block groups with the highest percentage of households without access to a personal vehicle. Eight of ten areas here are located within the City of Key West and within the Key West Transit (KWT) service area. Two areas are located in Marathon, where service is provided by the KWT Lower Keys Shuttle and the Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) 301, both of which operate on limited timetables. 81 Table 6-8: US Census Blocks with Highest Percentage of Households without Vehicle Access, 2019 Households Block Group Location Total Households Lacking Vehicle Percentage Access 120879724002 City of Key West 367 188 51.2% 120879718004 City of Key West 603 197 1 32.7% 120879720002 City of Key West 532 172 32.3% 120879724001 City of Key West 598 174 29.1% . .... ... 120879713003 Marathon 304 84 27.6% ... ... 120879723003 City of Key West 450 121 26.9% 120879722001 City of Key West 312 69 22.1% ... .... 120879712002 Marathon 584 120 20.5% 120879718003 City of Key West 251 49 19.5% 120879723002 City of Key West 503 88 17.5% Citywide, Key West has an estimated total of 14.4% of households that lack access to a vehicle. Along the rest of the US 1 corridor, including the Lower Keys, Marathon, Islamorada, and Key Largo, approximately 4.3% of households lack vehicle access. Figure 6-10 and Figure 6-11 show the areas with the highest concentration of zero-vehicle households. Though the US 1 corridor areas outside of the City of Key West have a lower overall percentage of these households, these maps show that zero-vehicle households exist in concentrated areas, which can be noted in Key Largo, Marathon, and Islamorada. The smaller keys have fewer zero-vehicle households. 82 Percentage of Households without Access to a Vehicle 00/0 0.1%-15% 3,15%-8.6% 8.7%-51.1% >51.2% C.dj-Key R,­d Key. Big Pine K�y. Ray P.Int N Stilton Key K 2.5 5 10 Miles Figure 6-10: Vehicle Access by Block Group: Key West and the Lower Keys, 2019 Percentage of Households without Access to a Vehicle N":1 0% 'J" 0.1%-3.5% 3.6%-8,60% 8.7%-51.1% >51.20/. IslamQrada N Marathon sf 11 20 Miles Figure 6-11: Vehicle Access by Block Group: Marathon, Islamorada, and Key Largo, 2019 Analysis revealed 25 census block groups with above average concentrations of zero-vehicle households. Further gap analysis revealed two block groups of which no part is within '/4mile of a transit stop. These block groups, both located in Key Largo, are shown on Figure 6-12 and 83 could be considered underserved by transit. Though the City of Key West has a number of blocks above the average for zero-vehicle households, all these census blocks fall withing '/4 mile of a KWT transit stop, so none of the blocks within the city qualified under this analysis. Identified Transit Gaps - Zero-Vehicle Households Area with Above Average Porportion of carJen Zero-Vehicle Households v Miami-Dade 301 Key IjY Bus Stop with 1/4 Mile Buffer rk - R` R a da1;o t()1-uf. kit, iP.'I Y 0<1'.h t tc io fnd ,a NC'V Q-1' �'honpsmi`t Mock I 0 1 2 Miles Figure 6-12: Zero-Vehicle Household Gap Analysis Households Experiencing Poverty The experience of poverty is a less-direct indicator of transit propensity but can show areas that a zero-vehicle analysis may miss. Households experiencing poverty may own a vehicle that is unreliable or have transportation needs that require multiple vehicles. Identifying areas with higher concentration of households experiencing poverty can reveal potential gaps in transit service. Approximately 10% of households in Monroe County experienced poverty sometime in 2019. The Census Bureau uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. The official poverty definition uses income before taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps). Table 6-9 shows the ten US Census block groups with the highest percentage of households that experienced poverty. These areas are more dispersed than the areas of zero-vehicle concentration. One of these block groups is located on Long Key, which does not have a bus stop 84 for either the Lower Keys Shuttle or MDT's Route 301. Near Long Point in Islamorada, block group 120879706003 is over five miles from the nearest bus stop near Rock Harbor. Figure 6-13 and Figure 6-14 provide the concentration of households experiencing poverty by US Census block groups in the Florida Keys. Note that the way the Census Bureau divides block groups means that some uninhabited islands may be included in a block group and these non- inhabited areas would appear in the choropleth maps. Also, the poverty level for a census block is calculated based on the income of only individuals and families living in their primary residence. This means that the income for families who own vacation homes in the keys are not included in poverty calculations for a census block. Table 6-9: US Census Blocks with Highest Percentage of Households Experiencing Poverty, 2019 Total Households Block Group Location Households Experiencing Percentage Poverty 120879704002 Key Largo 581 208 35.8% 120879718004 City of Key 603 212 35.2% West 120879706003 Key Largo 162 51 31.5% 120879710023 Long Key 251 60 23.9% 120879704004 Key Largo 295 63 21.4% 120879722002 City of Key 166 33 19.9% West 120879724003 City of Key 550 109 19.8% West 120879711001 Marathon 598 109 18.2% 120879726001 City of Key 342 61 17.8% West 120879719002 City of Key 1004 177 17.6% West 85 Percentage of Households Experiencing Poverty <3% 3.1%-Z9% 8.0%-14.2%, 14.3%-23.9% k >24% �;. C.djae Key -Big Pine Key :Ramrod Key 'Sugarloaf .".,.. Say Point. N nava`i AI 5[tnn Key U Key riesr4`� " 0 2.5 5' 10 Miles Figure 6-13: Poverty by Block Group: Key West and the Lower Keys, 2019 Percentage of Households Experiencing Poverty <3% "t 3.1% T9% oa le lake N C\N IYIJf err,"4 8.0%-14.2o/u GO 14.3% 23.9% >24% ,��y largo a A _9slamorada. N Marathod 0 5 10 20 Miles Figure 6-14: Poverty by Block Group: Marathon, Islamorada, and Key Largo, 2019 86 Analysis revealed 33 block groups with above average concentrations of households having experienced poverty during the previous year(i.e., 2018). Further gap analysis revealed 10 block groups of which no part is within '/4 mile of a transit stop. These block groups are located in Key Largo and Long Key as shown on Figure 6-15 and Figure 6-16. These areas could be considered underserved by transit. It should be noted that Duck Key is included in the same census block as Long Key. However, based on knowledge of the areas and since only primary residences are included in calculations it was determined that Long Key is more than likely the driving force in the higher poverty rates for this census block. Identified Transit Gaps-Households Experiencing Poverty Area with Above Average Porportion of Households Experiencing Poverty Miami-Dade 301 h , y„ Bus Stop with 1/4 Mile Buffer 'n7lers top �rr IJawpi ug ' 0 1.5 3 Miles Figure 6-15: Households Experiencing Poverty Gap Analysis, Key Largo Identified Transit Gaps-Households Experiencing Poverty 00 Area with Above Average Porportion of Households Experiencing Poverty Miami-Dade 301 Bus Stop with 114 Mile Buffer � Lair a L ,cAl vstEt?�' k,Sr b cH.l.er» mi.. JK 0'i' N 0 1.5 3 Miles Figure 6-16: Households Experiencing Poverty Gap Analysis, Long Key and Duck Key 87 7.3.2 Transit Recommendations Relevant Recommendations from Key West Transit Development Plan The 2019 Key West Transit Development Plan (TDP) contains a number of transit alternatives to enhance mobility within the City of Key West and the Florida Keys as a whole. The alternatives that are most relevant to this study are summarized below. Key West Intermodal Center Essential to KWT's future plans, the Key West Intermodal Center (KWIC)would be located at the current KWT facility on Stock Island's College Rd. This intermodal center would serve as a major transfer point for KWT routes and the terminus of the Lower Keys Shuttle, as well as host a park- and-ride facility, further reducing the number of private vehicles being brought onto Key West. Modified Lower Keys Shuttle A major recommendation includes modifying the Lower Keys Shuttle route to terminate at the proposed Key West Intermodal Center on Stock Island. This change eliminates the need for buses to enter Key West proper and thus avoids much of the traffic congestion associated with the area. This would allow for more reliable service with shorter runtimes. Additionally, the frequency of the Lower Keys Shuttle would increase from every two hours to every 45 minutes during peak and every 90 minutes at other times, improving the usefulness of this commuter-oriented service. KWIC Connector Under the proposed recommendations, the Lower Keys Shuttle would terminate at the KWIC on Stock Island. For continued service to Key West proper, riders would transfer to a new route, the KWIC Connector. The KWIC Connector is a proposed free and frequent route, similar to KWT's popular Duval Loop. Operating on 15-minute headways, this route would connect the KWIC on Stock Island with Downtown Key West, providing connections to the Lower Keys Shuttle and allowing visitors to park their cars and take free transit into Old Town Key West and other major destinations on the island. Improved Mobile App and Mobile Payment KWT riders can currently use the official City of Key West app to track KWT buses and access schedules. During the TDP planning process, public outreach determined that awareness of the app was low. The plan recommends the development of a standalone transit app, which would be more easily accessible and could allow for the implementation of mobile payment on KWT buses. 88 Additional Recommendations The unique nature of the Florida Keys and US 1 itself limits the feasibility of many traditional transit solutions. However,there are a number of improvements that could enhance the quality of service along the corridor. The following section contains recommendations divided into three categories: coverage improvements, operation optimization improvements, and passenger amenities. Coverage Improvements As noted, there are areas within the US 1 corridor where potential riders may be underserved by the current long-distance routes operated by MDT and KWT. Additionally, there may be a need for more local service, especially in the larger communities such as Marathon, Islamorada, and Key Largo. Increased Number of Stops Along MDT Route 301 MDT Route 301 offers fewer stops than the Lower Keys Shuttle. A greater distance between stops can offer operational benefits, but the gap analysis previously conducted revealed some communities along this route may be underserved by transit. The areas around Angler's Park, Newport, and Sunset Point in Key Largo. While balancing operational considerations, MDT should consider adding additional stops near these areas. Also, additional analysis could be conducted to determine if a new stop is warranted on Long Key. While home to fewer residents than the areas identified in Key Largo, this key had an above- average number of residents experiencing poverty in the last year. Extended MDT Route 301 MDT Route 301 currently terminates at Mile Marker 50, approximately 3 miles from Marathon's southern extent. This location serves as the transfer point between Route 301 and the Lower Keys Shuttle. For Route 301 riders with a final destination at the far end of Marathon, this means either a walk of several miles or a transfer to the Lower Keys Shuttle, which could turn into a wait of over an hour, depending on the time of day. Extending Route 301 further south down US 1 would eliminate the need for this transfer and improve the travel experience for these riders. Unified Transit Service While KWT's Lower Keys Shuttle and MDT's Route 301 can be chained together, infrequent headways and the potential for long layover times can be a major detractor for attracting riders. Replacing these routes with a jointly funded single service operated by either transit provider could attract more riders and reduce what could now be a five-hour transit journey to under three hours. Use of over-the-road coaches similar to those currently used for MDT's Route 89 301 would provide a superior level of passenger comfort, as well. Coaches are buses typically used for commuter or intercity routes and offer more comfortable seating and room for luggage either under the seating area or in overhead compartments. Such service could be provided by one of the current operators, with the other providing funding through an intergovernmental agreement. Consolidating the US 1 corridor down to a single route would make the service easier to use, faster for riders, and could potentially provide cost savings to both operators due to a reduction in redundancies. Intergovernmental agreements like this are common in transit operations, especially with long-distance routes such as this. Intra-Island Local Service Given the success of Key West's Duval Loop and plans to create additional lines using this model, other areas in the Florida Keys may find success in using linear circulators to move people around the individual communities along US 1, especially in the larger and more developed areas like Islamorada, Marathon, and Key Largo. The linear nature of the Keys means these routes can serve most major destinations with a simple, easy to understand route. Such services would be attractive to tourists and other visitors that would prefer to explore the Florida Keys without a car and could serve as a feeder route for commuters seeking to utilize the longer inter-island routes. Another option for intra-island transit service could be micro transit, an app-based, on- demand service mode that algorithmically optimizes routing. Unlike traditional dial-a-ride service where rides must be reserved a day or more in advance, micro transit uses an app to allow riders to request rides in real time. Micro transit systems can be door-to-door, or they can be configured to require riders to meet the bus nearby at a "virtual bus stop". This can increase operational efficiencies but may discourage riders due to weather conditions or a lack of pedestrian infrastructure. Whether a traditional circulator or micro transit, these intra-island services could eliminate the transit gaps identified. Frequent service operating on 15-minute headways could allow this service to work as viable "first-mile, last-mile" access to long-distance bus routes, eliminating the need for as many stops and improving operational efficiencies. Operational Optimizations As traffic increases along US 1, keeping transit buses moving is key to encouraging ridership. Technology improvements such as Transit Signal Priority (TSP) can help buses pass through intersections more quickly, while infrastructure like dedicated transit lanes, queue jumps, or bus- on-shoulder operation can reduce the amount of time buses spend in traffic congestion. 90 Combining these solutions where they are feasible and make sense could improve transit throughput and reliability along the US 1 corridor. Dedicated Transit Lanes Infrastructure improvements such as dedicated transit lanes greatly improve transit performance by giving buses and other transit vehicles an unobstructed lane for exclusive operation. However, such lanes can be difficult to implement, especially in areas with limited right-of-way such as US 1, as any widening must contend with limited physical space, property conflicts, and environmentally sensitive areas. The study area may contain limited areas where transit lanes could be implemented, but physical limitations combined with relatively low utilization of transit along the corridor mean this is not a feasible solution for the corridor. Bus-on-Shoulder Operation Easier to implement than dedicated transit lanes, bus-on-shoulder operation has been implemented in several states and internationally as a way to keep transit buses moving in areas with high traffic congestion. Cities such as San Diego, Kansas City, and Minneapolis- St. Paul have implemented bus-on-shoulder and seen time savings and reliability improvements. Operating guidelines usually state a maximum speed for shoulder-running buses, as well as a relative maximum (e.g., 10 MPH faster than traffic). This helps ensure safer operation. Areas with bus-on-shoulder capabilities are marked with "BUS ONLY' lettering to inform drivers. Bus-on-shoulder is an incremental solution and would not be feasible throughout the US 1 corridor. Limited right-of-way in developed areas and along bridges and causeways, as well as potential conflicts with the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail, would prevent bus-on- shoulder implementation throughout the US 1 corridor. However, there are several areas, predominantly in the Upper Keys, where bus-on-shoulder could be implemented to reduce the time transit vehicles are delayed by traffic congestion. Traffic Signal Timing Optimizations As traffic congestion is mitigated, bus on-time-performance improves. A practical way to reduce congestion is assuring that signal timings are optimized following an arterial travel time and delay study (ATTDS). Signals along US 1 were recently retimed, and the 2021 ATTDS finds that overall travel speed along US 1 increased by 0.9 mph. Also, the 2021 ATTDS states that the travel speeds in the Lower Keys were significantly improved (by 7 mph), which could potentially be attributed to the recent improvements in signal timing. 91 Regular timing studies can ensure that traffic is not being unnecessarily delayed by inappropriate signal timing. Transit Signal Priority Transit Signal Priority (TSP) is a technology that reduces the delay to transit vehicles at signalized intersections. Implementing TSP along fixed-route transit lines will improve on- time performance and reliability of service. Where implemented, buses equipped with TSP technology wirelessly communicate with upcoming traffic signals. The signals can then temporarily extend a green phase to allow the bus to clear the intersection. By reducing the number of red lights buses encounter, TSP facilitates faster and more reliable transit service. Successful implementation of TSP requires compatible TSP equipment at each traffic signal (road-side units) and on each bus (on-board units). The traffic signals must also utilize software that is compatible with TSP operations. Roadside Units have non-transit related capabilities and benefits as well, including signal preemption for emergency vehicles, safety applications, and intelligent signal timing to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. Queue Jumps Queue jumps are another incremental solution that can improve transit bus reliability. Buses use the right-turn lane to move to the front of the traffic queue, actuating a bus-only signal, usually lasting between five and ten seconds (see Figure 6-17).This gives buses enough time to "jump" through the intersection and ahead of queued traffic. Queue jumps are a roadway improvement that work with TSP-enabled traffic signals to give buses a head start at traffic signals. These queue jump lanes may be collocated with existing or new right turn lanes. When a bus approaches and actuates the signal, the right turning drivers are also given a turn signal, emptying the queue and allowing the bus to move through the intersection. Queue jumps are only effective where there is room to implement these extra lanes, and where traffic conditions create delays at intersections. US 1 does not have a high concentration of traffic signals, but right turn lanes are present at many of these signalized intersections. Adding queue jumps at these intersections as part of a larger transit priority system could reduce delays caused by traffic congestion. Queue Jumps can increase delay to other traffic but, reduces delays caused when buses need to merge into traffic after stopping to offload or receive passengers. feasibility study including traffic simulation for the potential queue jump intersections along US 1 in Monroe 92 County would be required to quantify the potential benefits and impacts of implementing a queue jump at these locations. Some VISSIM modeling conducted for sample corridors in Broward County, FL suggests that when queue jumps are combined with Transit Signal Priority, the delay for both transit and general traffic is reduced. I`t 01 t � III Figure 6-17: Conceptual Queue Jump at the intersection of US 1 & Key Deer Boulevard, Big Pine Key Passenger Amenities Improved Bus Stops Generally, bus stops along US 1 are difficult to find and lack shade, seating, and other amenities. In areas like the Keys, weather can be hostile to transit riders, and providing them with a safe and comfortable place to wait is an important priority. Bus shelters provide shade from the sun and cover from rain, both of which are significant concerns in the Keys. Shelters can be a simple awning with a bench or can include glass panels to provide additional protection from the elements. Lighting provides additional safety and security and helps drivers know when riders are waiting. Many transit systems have begun using solar powered lighting, which eliminates the expense of running electrical infrastructure. Bus shelters can be further enhanced by adding electric fans to provide additional comfort in hot environments. Bike racks can offer riders a place to secure their bicycle if they choose not to take it on the bus. 93 App and Mobile Payment Enhancements The Key West Transit TDP recommends the creation of an app to help riders track buses and purchase passes. Additionally, KWT could invest in fareboxes that accept contactless payment, such as digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay, etc.) or contactless credit or debit cards. This allows for direct fare payment without the need to interact with an app, further streamlining the process for users. Many transit systems, including MDT, have begun using these contactless systems. 94 7 Roadway Analysis 7.4 Capacity Based Roadway Analysis As discussed in Section 6.3, several roadway segments along US 1 are expected to operate at LOS D or worse (see Appendix F) in the future. As such, these segments were reviewed to identify potential roadway improvements that may be implemented to improve operations. While the potential improvements listed below may improve operations, there may be constraints that preclude their implementation, including policy restrictions, public opposition or impacts to the social, cultural, natural, or physical environments. There are current Monroe County Policies that limit roadway widening along US 1 in Monroe County. A summary of these policies is provided below. • Policy 301.5.1 — The capacity of US 1 in unincorporated Monroe County shall be limited to four-lanes. Densities and intensities on the Future Land Use Map and allowed by the permit allocation system shall not exceed those that can be accommodated by the four-lane limitation on US 1. • Policy 301.7.2— In recognition of the physical and environmental constraints that may affect the widening of US 1 to four-lanes, Monroe County shall coordinate with FDOT on those portions of US 1 that are shown as two-lanes on the Future Traffic Circulation Map to maintain them as two-lanes for the planning horizon. This policy shall not be construed so as to prohibit the addition of a third lane to be used as a continuous two- way turn lane for those segments with a demonstrated public safety risk, if the third lane has been demonstrated to be the safest alternative. 7.4.1 Key West Future traffic projections (Year 2040) indicate a failing level of service for the US 1 segment from White Street to Roosevelt Boulevard and on S. Roosevelt Boulevard from Flagler Avenue to US 1. North Roosevelt Boulevard from White Street to Jose Marti Drive This two-lane segment of US 1 is constrained by adjacent land uses, with residential on the north side and a Bayview Park on the south side. Widening of this quarter-mile segment of US 1 would not be feasible. Jose Marti Drive to Roosevelt Boulevard This segment of US 1 is generally five lanes, with two-lanes in each direction and a bidirectional turn lane, which in some areas is striped as a dedicated left turn into adjacent properties. Widening the road would not be feasible in this section due to the shoreline 95 immediately adjacent to the north side of the road and commercial properties along the south side of the road. Flagler Avenue to US 1 This one quarter mile four-lane undivided segment of US 1 is likely congested due to operations at the intersection of US 1 and Roosevelt Boulevard. Operational improvement of that intersection may improve operations of this short segment of Roosevelt Boulevard. US 1/Roosevelt Boulevard Intersection This signalized intersection experiences heavy congestion and has free flow right turn movements, which can pose a safety issue for pedestrians. An additional westbound left-turn lane or a roundabout or other type of intersection improvements should be evaluated at this location to improve traffic operations. Roosevelt Boulevard to College Road There appears to be right of way available to widen US 1 to three lanes in each direction along this segment. This would require the widening or reconstruction of the bridge between Key West and Stock Island and a change in Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policy. 7.4.2 Boca Chica Key Future traffic projections indicate a failing level of service for the US 1 segment from Rockland Drive to Boca Chica Road. Saratoga Avenue to Rockland Drive US 1 is a four-lane divided roadway in this segment. Sufficient right of way appears to exist to support widening to six lanes and/or intersection improvements. However, roadway widening would require changes to the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policies. Rockland Drive to Coppitt Road US 1 is one lane in each direction along this nearly 3/4-mile segment, with one quarter mile on structure over potentially environmentally sensitive lands. If widening of this bridge is not feasible, there are no other options to increase capacity within this segment, and the bridge would remain a bottleneck in this area. Coppitt Road to Boca Chica Road US 1 is three lanes in this location, with one through lane in each direction and the middle lane serving as a left turn lane into adjacent properties where required. Widening US 1 to four or five lanes in this segment may be an option; however, the bridge to the south would remain a bottleneck if it is not able to be widened. Operational improvements could include dedicated right turn lanes into adjacent properties, or a frontage road serving properties along the north side of the road. Shorter segments of frontage roads/connected driveways exist within this 96 segment and a continuation of that system between Coppitt Road and Boca Chica Road may alleviate traffic congestion in this area. Boca Chica Key to Sugarloaf Key Traffic forecasts indicate that US 1 within this segment is projected to operate at capacity. Adjacent land uses are limited as most of the road is on causeway or structure. Widening of this two-lane segment may not be feasible due to environmental constraints. There is a flashing beacon on US 1 at Sugarloaf Boulevard. Based on the feedback received form the Monroe County Sheriff's office, this intersection experiences crashes on a frequent basis. Conducting an intersection study to determine safety and operational improvements is suggested. 7.4.3 Big Pine Key If the bridge between Little Torch Key and Big Pine Key is not able to be widened due to environmental constraints or policy restrictions, it would remain a bottleneck in this section. US 1 on Big Pine Key south of Sands Road is of varying width, but primarily one lane in each direction with turn lanes. There appears to be sufficient right of way to widen US 1 to provide a second southbound through lane from the north pine channel bridge to 11t Street. The intersection of Key Deer Boulevard appears to be a bottleneck in this area. As such, improvements at this intersection may help to relieve the congestion within this corridor. Additionally, Avenue A, located north of and parallel to US 1 from Cunningham Lane, could be incorporated as a frontage road or incorporated into US 1 as the northbound lanes of a one-way pair. From Ships Way to Cunningham Lane, the frontage road/one-way pair could be extended the length of Big Pine Key to serve adjacent properties and removing traffic from US 1. The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail must be accommodated in any improvements within this segment. 7.4.4 Marathon Traffic forecasts indicate that short segments of US 1 at Palm Island Avenue and the entrance to the City Marina are projected to operate at capacity in the future. There are no turn lanes at these two locations. The four-lane undivided segments of US 1 in Marathon between 11t" Street Ocean and Aviation Boulevard (approximately three miles) may operate at a reduced capacity if there are numerous left turns over the double yellow, which can cause queuing in the inside through lane. Adjacent businesses within this segment appear to have designated parking spaces within FDOT right of way. While this is a common practice on older stretches of highway within the 97 State, it is not legal for businesses to designate parking on FDOT property. Parking within FDOT right of way may contribute to congestion and safety issues. There is sufficient room within the existing right of way to provide turn lanes to adjacent cross streets. Also, consideration should be given to widening US 1 to extend the four-lane section between 11th Street Ocean and 15th Street. 7.4.5 Islamorada US 1 is projected to operate at or above capacity between SR 4A just south of Whale Harbor Channel to Royal Poinciana Boulevard south of Tavernier Creek. A major bottleneck in this area is the two-lane moveable bridge over Snake Creek(the last moveable bridge in the Keys), which is programmed to be replaced with a fixed span. FDOT is currently conducting a feasibility study. Within Islamorada, US 1 is one lane in each direction with turn lanes at cross streets. There may not be sufficient right of way through the length of this segment to widen US 1 to four- lanes without relocation of or damage to adjacent businesses. However, SR 4A/Old Highway 1 runs parallel to US 1 along the south side of the road from Treasure Harbor Drive to Tavernier Creek. It may be possible to incorporate SR 4A, which has one through lane in each direction, as the northbound two-lanes of a one-way pair with US 1. While this may be technically feasible, converting a roadway serving local traffic to part of a one-way pair poses substantial challenges: - Routing through traffic to a roadway previously serving local traffic may face public opposition - The local road may require reconstruction to provide adequate pavement and drainage, which could impact adjacent properties - Businesses previously visible to two directions of traffic would in the future only have visibility to one direction of traffic, especially if the one-way pairs are separated by a great distance or vegetation As another option, SR 4A can be used as an alternative route for US 1 traffic during the peak periods and/or during incidents to improve traffic flow. 7.4.6 Key Largo US 1 is two-lanes in each direction south of the intersection at Card Sound Road and one lane in each direction north of the intersection at Card Sound Road. Between Andros Road and Summerland Road, a distance of less than one half mile, there are 13 access points (Andros Road, Abaco Road, Lake Surprise Boulevard, North End Road/SB Card Sound Road, Garden 98 Cove Dr., NB Card Sound Road, north and south Shell station driveways, Key Largo Baptist Church, Coral Drive, two unnamed access roads across from Coral Drive and Summerland Road). In addition to consolidating these access points, reconfiguring the intersection of US 1 and Card Sound Road could alleviate congestion at this location. 7.5 Potential New Bridges A total of four potential new bridge options were identified as alternative transportation options to help reduce traffic on US 1 in three critical areas (Stock Island, Big Pine, and Upper Matecumbe). Please note that the first two bridge options accomplish the same goal of providing an additional transportation option between Stock Island and Key West. These two potential options were identified for further review to determine the best location for the bridge to accomplish this goal. Detailed feasibility studies need to be conducted to evaluate the need for and feasibility of these bridges. Potential environmental, structural, traffic, land use, and right-of-way impacts and public input need to be considered as part of the feasibility studies. These options are provided as potential high-level solutions for review and consideration and would be considered long-term solutions for studies, feasibility, funding and implementation. 7.5.1 Stock Island to/from Key West Bridge Two bridge alternatives were identified to provide additional transportation options for local traffic between Stock Island and Key West, as shown in Figure 7-1. Some potential considerations for each of these bridge options are listed below. 99 a 77777 v Ck f I Y t bA' ' s sN 4 g - �i,� - �� � `M2 4 t,• ra } �"1 15) t AV Ir ` h k Figure 7-1: Potential New Bridge Options - Stock Island to Key West General Considerations for Both Bridge Options The following issues should be considered as part of the feasibility study for both bridge options: - Increased traffic to both 5th Street and 5` Avenue on Stock Island, in a residential area — there is a potential for sociocultural effects, and impacts to environmental justice (EJ) communities (minority and low-income) - 5th Avenue appears to have on-street parking so any new design would need to account for parking - If tolled, potential for disproportional adverse effect to low income communities; potential for EJ concerns and/or coordination with USEPA for compliance with EO 12898 - Cow Key Marina (located at the west end of 5` Avenue) — kayak business will likely be impacted. Potential for economic compensation. - High potential for impacts to mangroves at western edge of 5th Avenue, mitigation likely required - Project site is located within Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) and Johnson's seagrass habitat (federally endangered species) - Protected species: potential to impact several marine species (would require minimization impacts to manatee, sea turtles, seagrass, etc.) 100 Consider designing the bridge height to minimize shading impacts to seagrass beds and to accommodate existing boats (size and type) Proposed bridge would cross a navigable waterway — coordination with USCG would be required - Bridges should be limited to no greater than 2 lane bridge to minimize environmental impacts - Potential to add bird deterrents (similar to those at Sebastian Inlet) to protect bridge and birds Environmental permitting would be required with FKNMS, FDEP, USACE, USCG, and SFWMD - Consider potential for impacts to historic resources - Bridge from Theoretical 13th and Thompson Island will be longer than a bridge at 51h Ave and would also generate more environmental impacts. - Bridge at Thompson Island will require widening or replacement of the existing bridge from Thompson Island and Roosevelt Boulevard. - Theoretical 1311 Avenue may require fill material for a suitable roadbed. - USCG requirements will dictate the height of the bridge for vertical clearance - Vertical Clearance will govern the length of the bridge and its touch down points - Bridge length may encroach well into the land portion. - Water depth may dictate the bridge foundation system to be built with concrete drilled shafts - Potential impacts to the Cow Key Marina and surrounding businesses Additional Considerations for 5th Avenue Connection to Thompson Island - Thompson Island — land acquisition and bridge upgrades appear to be required - Potential site for mangrove mitigation: Mangrove impacts could be mitigated at Thompson Island (if agreed to by agencies and County) - Longest bridge option with most impacts to the channel. - Bridge results in the connection of the same roads as the other options; therefore, it could be the costliest option. - The current bridge connecting Thompson Island to South Roosevelt Boulevard may need to be widened to accommodate additional traffic from the new bridge. - USCG requirements will dictate the height of the bridge for vertical clearance - Vertical Clearance will govern the length of the bridge and its touch down points - Bridge length longer than from 5th Ave to Douglas Circle and may encroach well into the land portion. 101 Water depth may dictate the bridge foundation system to be built with concrete drilled shafts Potential impacts to the Cow Key Marina and surrounding businesses Additional Considerations for 5th Avenue Connection to Douglas Circle - Coordination likely required with VA Outpatient Clinic/ Naval Branch Health Clinic (federal property), located just north of Thompson Island - Access to Douglas Circle appears to be restricted — no Google Street Views available - May require widening of the existing local roads which could require right of way acquisitions along private properties. 7.5.2 Big Pine Key Bridge A potential bridge location is shown in Figure 7-2. This bypass bridge could reduce traffic congestion on US 1 in Big Pine Key. Some potential considerations for this bypass bridge are listed below. vfAl �1 Figure 7-2: Potential Big Pine Key Bypass Bridge Considerations For Big Pine Bypass Bridge - Located in Big Pine Key National Wildlife Refuge; coordination with USFWS will be required - Coupon Bight Aquatic Preserve at southern end of Big Pine Key; it is also a protected Outstanding Florida Water (OFW); coordination with FDEP will be required 102 Potential for substantial negative economic impacts to local businesses located along US in Big Pine Key (tourists are a major source of revenue) — potential impacts to local economy Potential impacts to mangroves and salt marshes (abundant along the coast)and possibly seagrasses; potential impacts to endangered species such as Key deer, Lower Keys marsh rabbit, and silver rice rat - Potential for incidental take of endangered species; possible Incidental Take Permit (ITP) and associated Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP); approvals by USFWS will be required There is an existing Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in place with the FDOT and the USFWS/FWC which will likely need to be modified or a new one will need to be conducted to address impacts to protected species— Key Deer, Lower Keys marsh rabbit, etc. —this can take 1-2 years to complete. Potential for negative aesthetic issues/viewshed for community particularly at SW end of Big Pine Key - Overall: potential for negative impact to community character of Florida Keys Permitting required with FDEP, USACE and SFWMD - Consider potential for impacts to historic resources - Bridge along the south side of Big Pine Key will require reviews, input and approvals from USCG, FDEP and USFWS. - USCG requirements will dictate the height of the bridge for vertical clearance - Vertical Clearance will govern the length of the bridge and its touch down points Bridge length may encroach well into the land portion. Water depth may dictate the bridge foundation system to be built with concrete drilled shafts 7.5.3 Upper Matecumbe Bridge A bypass bridge may be considered to reduce traffic congestion on US 1 in Upper Matecumbe between the Snake Creek Bridge and Tea Table Key. A potential bridge location is shown in Figure 7-3. Some potential considerations for this bypass bridge are listed below. 103 �F; Q a t I 0b f t Figure 7-3: Potential Upper Matecumbe Bypass Bridge Considerations For Upper Matecumbe Bypass Bridge - Very long bridge would be costly and intrusive to the view from the east coast properties. - Good candidate for segmental concrete box bridge construction - May need to provide fender systems at certain canal crossings - Potential impacts to the pristine waters along the east coast - Bridge permit reviews required by USCG, FDEP and FWC - Project area is within known range of several protected species (threatened &endangered mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, butterflies, plants) and federally designated critical habitat; approvals from/coordination with USFWS, NOAA Fisheries, and FWC will be required - Upper Matecumbe Key is a known area for sea turtle nesting (hawksbill, leatherback, loggerhead) and within federally designated critical habitat for these species. Any construction may require work outside nesting season (May 1 — October 31). Any new lighting on the bridge would need to be coordinated with/approved by USFWS and FWC - Project area is located in a protected Outstanding Florida Water(OFW); coordination with FDEP will be required to address any water quality concerns 104 Also located in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), so coordination/approvals from FKNMS will be required Potential impacts to mangroves (protected) and salt marshes (abundant along the coast) and possibly seagrasses; coordination/approvals from NOAA Fisheries and FDEP will be required Social/community characteristics: potential for negative impact to community character of Florida Keys; potential for negative aesthetic issues / viewshed; potential for negative economic impacts to local businesses along US1 (tourists are a major source of revenue) and overall decrease in local economy In addition to the bridge permits, environmental permitting with FKNMS, FDEP, USACE and SFWMD will be required Any impacts to Windley Key Fossil Reef Geologic State Park (historic) would require coordination with FDEP - Consider potential for impacts to historic/archaeological resources (should be reviewed separately by Cultural Resources specialist) 105 8 Water Transportation Analysis The economic and environmental impacts of growing traffic congestion is reviving interest in the nation's navigable waterways. Multiple state and federal agencies recognize the potential benefit of capitalizing the nation's underutilized waterways as a means to alleviate rail and road congestion. The Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration (MARAD) and Federal Transit Authority (FTA) have both developed programs to provide technical and financial assistance to state and local governments that invest in improvements to water transportation infrastructure. Particular priority is given to those corridors that can provide relief to congested landside corridors. The number of vehicles traveling on US 1 in Monroe County have started to exceed the overall capacity of the highway leading to increasing congestion, slow travel times, and more frequent vehicle accidents. Water-Based Transportation Route Options The purpose of this section is to evaluate potential water-based transportation routes to/from Key West that may help alleviate traffic congestion on US 1 in the Florida Keys. These were stand- alone reviews with the goal of identifying one or more routes with the potential to reduce traffic congestion along US 1. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and includes the following route options: 1. Between Key West and Stock Island 2. Between Key West and Marathon 3. Between Key West and Islamorada 4. Between Key West and Key Largo 5. Between Key West and Miami Route between Key Largo and Key West One of the route options considered for evaluation was a potential ferry route from Key Largo to Key West. However, Key Largo does not have a public/municipal docking facility, contains large areas of state and federally protected areas on the Atlantic side (limited access), and lacks inlets/channel cuts to easily move from the Atlantic Ocean into Florida Bay. Considering the distance between Key Largo and Key West, the use of a large ferry (>100 ft length) would be necessary to both sustain higher speeds (comparable to road trip time of approximately 3 hours) and to travel in all water/weather conditions (schedule reliability/vessel safety). This is not to say Key Largo couldn't support a passenger ferry route but would require extensive coordination/planning/site development to bring a ferry route to fruition. For example, development of public/private partnership between the County and one of the commercial docking facilities on Jewfish Creek/IWW could allow berthing of a large passenger ferry. However, in order 106 for this area to work, it would require either a multi-level parking structure on one of the existing commercial properties or an offsite parking facility in south Miami-Dade County (ex. Florida City) with a shuttle to/from the ferry terminal. Islamorada, which is the next closest terminal option, hosts a large public/municipal docking facility (Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina), has multiple deep-water inlets/channel cuts (Snake Creek, Whale Harbor Channel, Treatable Key Channel, and Tavernier Creek), and provides enhanced public ground transportation services. Therefore, the route between Key West and Key Largo was eliminated from further consideration and the remaining four options including the Islamorada to Key West routes were evaluated further in the following sections. 7.6 Passenger Ferry System Overview Throughout the US, passenger ferries serve an important role in the transport of people. This section looks at operational passenger ferry services in other US regions that may provide guidance for the development of a water transportation system in Monroe County. Each ferry operation is evaluated in a series of tables based on the system overview, route characteristics and frequency of service, and vessel/docking facility details. Passenger ferry operations evaluated in this report include: • Washington State Ferries (Washington) • San Francisco Hovercraft' (California) • Miami-Dade County Poseidon Ferry (Florida) • Key West Express (Florida) • Yankee Freedom/Dry Tortugas (Florida) • Balearia Caribbean (Florida/Bahamas) • Fort Lauderdale Water Taxi (Florida) • Miami Water Taxi (Florida) Table 8-1: Existing Passenger Ferry Services-Overview Name Route Purpose One-Way Fare ($) Last Mile Description $2.75 (walk on Commuter, senior, shortest Buses, Washington State Ferries Puget Sound Tourism, route)to $159.70 Foot Traffic, Recreational (vehicle under 80', Light Rail longest route) While not yet in operation, the San Francisco hovercraft has been included since it is an advanced feasibility study on connecting communities particularly in the shallow water South Bay. 107 Route Name Purpose One-Way Fare ($) Last Mile Description Commuter, Buses, San Francisco $7 (shortest route)to San Francisco Bay Tourism, Foot Traffic, Hovercraft $31 (longest route) Recreational Light Rail ... ............................................................. .... .... ..... Buses, Miami-Dade Miami/Miami Commuter, Foot Traffic, County Beach & Tourism, $4 (Senior), $10 Bikes, Taxis, Poseidon Miami/Coconut Recreational (Adult), 2$ (Bike) Metrorail Grove ------------ Fort Myers/Key Buses, Key West West& Marco Tourism, $40 (discount return) Foot Traffic, Express Island/Ke West Recreational to $101 Y Bikes, Taxis $67.5 (child), $90 Buses, Yankee Key West& Dry Tourism, (Student, Military, Freedom Tortugas Recreational and Senior), $95 Foot Traffic, Bikes, Taxis (adult) Balearia Ft Lauderdale to Tourism, $90 (Economy)to 11 Buses, Taxis, Bimini &Grand Caribbean Bahama Recreational $130 (Premium) Trolley (Bimini) New River& Buses Fort Lauderdale Intracoastal Tourism, $14 to Foot Traffic, Water Taxi Recreational $28 (hop on, hop off) Waterway Bikes, Taxis Miami Water Miami to Miami Tourism, $15-$30 (hop on, Buses, Taxi Beach Recreational hop off) Foot Traffic, Bikes, Taxis The existing ferry services have sailing distances ranging from 2.7 miles (Washington State) to 136 miles (Key West Express). Most larger ferry services are direct trips with the only stop at the destination, while the water taxis have 5 or more and operate in a loop. The Washington State, San Francisco and Miami-Dade Poseidon have a service frequency of 30 to 60 minutes during peak hours to accommodate commuters. Ferry services that cater for tourism or recreational purposes have either daily departures or start their schedule after 10 am. All the Florida based ferry services use catamaran vessels of various lengths. The catamarans are more fuel efficient due to less surface area in the water, have greater lateral stability, and are ideal for calm waters. The catamaran ferries also have a shallow draft allowing them to access smaller docks and moor at a both floating and pile-supported docking facilities. 108 Table 8-2: Existing Passenger Ferry Service-Details Sailing/Service Name # # Distance (mi) Time (min) Frequency (min) Routes Stops Washington I 2.7 to 16 10 to 60 30 to 85 10 1 to 2 State Ferries San Francisco _ 30/60 (peak)to Hovercraft 1 10 to 37 15 to 60/90/120 (off 12 1, 3 to (study) 56 (at 35 knots) peak) 5 .....Miami-Dade County I 1 4 to 6 20 to 30 60 2 1 Poseidon Key West I 1105 to 136 210 to 240 1440 2 1 Express Yankee Freedom 70 130 1440 1 1 Balearia 51 to 85 120 to 240 1440 to 4,320 2 1 Caribbean Fort Lauderdale 7.5 (loop) 14 45 to 60 35 to 45 2 11 Water Taxi (express) 120-150 after 10am Miami Water 7.8 (loop) 20 to 45 60 to 90 after noon 1 (loop) 5 Taxi Table 8-3: Existing Ferry Vessel and Dock Details Passenger Vessel Size (ft) Vessel Name Waterway Dock Type Capacity Length Draft Type Sheltered 11 to Pile-supported Washington State 273 to water auto/ Puget 748 to 2,499 with lowered Ferries 460 18.5 passenger Sound ferries ramps San San Francisco 12000TD Concrete 80 78 < 2 Francisco Hovercraft (study) hovercraft Bay ramps Miami-Dade County 149 65 4 Catamaran Biscayne Floating docks Poseidon Bay within marina 4.5 to Gulf of Key West Express 511 170 Catamaran Floating dock 5.5 Mexico 109 Gulf of Concrete/piled Yankee Freedom 175 to 250 110 5.75 Catamaran Mexico -supported docks Concrete/Pile- 600 Atlantic Balearia Caribbean (140 Autos) Ocean 266 10.3 Catamaran supported docks Fort Lauderdale Intracoastal Concrete/pile- Water Taxi -48 to 90 --30 4 Catamaran Waterway supported docks Miami Water Taxi —35 —30 4 Catamaran Biscayne Floating dock Bay within marina 7.7 Community Snapshots This section provides a snapshot for each of the five termini (Key West, Stock Island, Marathon, Islamorada, and Miami) associated with the four water transportation routes to/from Key West. Each community snapshot evaluates the following features as they related to the communities' suitability as a route terminus: • Community Demographics • Existing US 1 Level of Service • Existing Passenger Pool • Water Access' • Peripheral Services • Terminal Suitability All channel data derived from NOAA Navigation Charts and NOAA Coast Pilot Volume 4,52nd Edition 110 Cora Springs I only spfhgs d tf r Fort l.altdeldale N6litUS r` .pe,nbieke 17incs S¢kirhstfhee J to er r$Yxalid Presarva� SM TpP of -.`° Stait!Po,N P�san[i ve F;r,v 3d,�-'h - - hlialeah t�liarru 7r Miami @vergludra NaKiur�at Parl< 10.0"r(,.ys 4 I ion'.9a trail Q Islamorada Marathon Key West ��"�iock Island Figure 8-1: Five Community Locations 111 7.7.1 Key West Key West is the westernmost developed island in the Florida Keys and the southern end of US 1. It is located between Mile Markers 0 and 4. Existing US 1 Level of Service According to FDOT generalized LOS criteria, the US 1 segments on Key West experience congestion and unacceptable LOS based on 2019 traffic data. Passenger Pool Residents In 2017, 82% of all work trips originating from Key West ended in Key West while another approximately 8% ended in Stock Island and 6% ended in lower Marathon. Tourists With the exception of the cruise ship passengers, a majority of tourists visiting Key West annually arrive via automobile. Note that in 2020, with the arrival of COVID-19, air travel restrictions resulted in a sharp decline in people flying into Key West. Table 8-4: Monroe County Annual Visitor Profile Study Transportation Method 2020 (%) 2019 (%) 2018(%) Drive personal vehicle 42.5 35.7 35.3 Drive rental vehicle 28.5 28.6 27.5 Fly into Key West 19.9 23.2 22.6 Flyto Miami and rent a car 7.1 8.0 10.0 ____ Fly into Marathon 1.6 3.1 3.2 Other FL airport and drive rental 0.1 0.6 0.0 Come by tour bus 0.4 0.7 1.4 Other 0.0 0.1 0.0 ... .... ._ . Sources:Monroe County_TDC Visitor Profi/e Survey!(2020&2019. Water Access Hawks Channel Hawks Channel extends northeast from Key West (127 miles) to Cape Florida. Water depths in the channel vary from 9 to 34 feet with a minimum channel width of 0.25 mile. Intracoastal Waterway The Intracoastal Waterway in the Florida Keys extends southwest from southern Biscayne Bay, through Card Sound, Barnes Sound, Blackwater Sound, Buttonwood Sound and into Florida Bay before splitting into two routes. The Florida Bay side continues southwest to Big Spanish Channel, Northwest Channel, and finally to Key West Harbor(54 miles). The Southern route cuts 112 through Moser Channel south into Hawk Channel where it continues southeast to the entrance to Key West Harbor (40 Miles). Key West Main Ship Channel The main ship channel into Key West Harbor is a federally managed, deep-draft waterway on the western side of Key West. The main entrance channel and cuts A and B all have a depth of 34 feet which drop to 30 feet in the turning basin and then down to 26 feet in the Key West Bight Channel. Key West Bight Channel Key West Bight is a 26-foot-deep channel running approximately '/2 mile from the main channel just north of Municipal Wharf to Key West Bight. Water depths drop to 12 feet in the Bight turning basin. Garrison Bight Channel Garrison Bight Channel has a control depth of 7.5 feet and is accessible from either the Atlantic via Main Ship Channel or the Gulf of Mexico via the Northwest Channel. Table 8-5: Waterways-Key West -------------- Waterway Min Depth (ft) Max Vertical Clearance (ft) Key West Main Ship Channel 26 no limit Key West Bight Channel 12 no limit ... .... ... _Garrison_Bight Chan nelJ17.51 19'(Garrison Bight Causeway) Note: 1-Minimum depth of 4.5'and 18'maximum vertical clearance if take Fleming Key Cut into Garrison Bight Channel Source:NOAA Coast Pilot Volume 4, 52nd Edition Docking Facilities Key West has substantial deep-water docking capacity including three cruise terminals at the Port of Key West (Figure 8-2) and a recently expanded public ferry terminal along Key West Bight (Figure 8-3). Table 8-6: Existing Docking Facilities-Key West Min Max Facility Facility Depth Length Type Parking Waterway (ft) (ft) City Marina at Garrison 7/4.5' 70 Public Public Garrison Bight Channel/ .... Bight Fleming Key Cut Garrison Bight Marina 4 40 Private Private Garrison Bight Channel/ Fleming Key Cut Conch Harbor Marina 9 200 Private Private Key West Bight Channel Key West Bight Marina 10 140 Public Public Key West Bight Channel .... ..... 113 Min Max Facility Facility Depth Length Type Parking Waterway (ft) (ft) Key West Bight Ferry g 240+ Public Public Key West Bight Channel Terminal A& B Marina 14 215 Private Private i Key West Bight Channel Galleon Marina 9 155 Private Private Key West Bight Channel Mallory Square Pier 31 700 Public I Public Key West Main Ship Channel Pier B 31 1050 Private Private 2 Key West Main Ship Channel Outer Mole Pier 35 1050 Public Public3 Key West Main Ship Notes: Channel .. . ... 1. Minimum depth if take Fleming Key Cut into Garrison Bight Channel. 2. Public parking may be available nearby. 3. Requires taking a trolly from Mallory Square Pier to the Naval Base Pier. Port of Key West The Port of Key West hosts three deep-water docking facilities (Figure 8-2) that support over 300 cruise ship calls in a " standard year making it one of the busiest in the nation. Mallory Square M iory Fqi ar,8' Mallory Square is a public docking facility located just north of ` Pier B. It is a T-Pier(115 ft length) and can support vessels up to 700 linear feet and a max 27-foot draft. Plans are in place to „ 1 extend/improve the Pier including increasing the length to 200 @ ft, installing new mooring monopile and repair/rehabilitating the Pier bulkhead. Pier B is a privately owned/operated facility that supports up to a 1050-foot vessel with a maximum of 29-foot draft. A small ferry launches from Pier B to the Sunset Key Resort (< 1 mile) old Mole Pier twice an hour. Pier B's terminal platform is the most frequently used facility for cruise ship calls. Outer Mole Pier is a federal (Navy)docking facility leased by the Figure 8-2: Port of Key West city of Key West. It is located south of Pier B and can support a vessel up to 1050 feet with a maximum of 29-foot draft. 114 Key West Bight The Key West Bight is home to multiple public docking facilities including Key West Bight Marina and Key West Bight Ferry Terminal (Figure 8-3). All the facilities are accessible via the Main Shipping Channel. The Key West Ferry Terminal was recently updated with a 20 by 80-foot concrete pier extension pl and serves as the current ferry launch for the Yankee Freedom Ferry to Dry Tortugas National Park and the Figure 8-3: Key West Bight Key West Express to Fort Myers and Marco Island. Peripheral Services Key West is currently serviced by three existing City bus routes along with daily Greyhound bus services. Key West City Route Key West Transit's City Route has two routes that provide services in Key West and Stock Island. The North line runs from Historic Key West (Truman & Emma) to the Northern Side of Stock Island (College Road Key West Transit). Buses run on a fixed schedule every 1.3 hours Monday thru Friday(6am-7pm) plus a shortened schedule on the weekend. Multiple bus stops are located less than 1 mile from Garrison Bight, Key West Bight Ferry Terminal, and the Port of Key West. The South line runs between Historic Key West and South Stock Island. Buses run on a fixed schedule every 1.3 hours Monday thru Friday (6am-7pm) plus a shortened schedule on the weekend. The south line has a stop at Florida Keys International Airport and multiple stops less than 1 mile of the Port of Key West. Duval Loop The Duval Loop is a free hop-on bus route that runs along Duval Street as well as along Key West Bight and the Truman Waterfront. Buses run every half-hour and stops within 1,000 feet of all the primary docking facilities. There are multiple transfer points to both the South and North City Routes from the Duval Loop. Table 8-7: Key West City Route— Fares Pass Type Full Fare ($) Reduced Fare ($) Senior Fare ($) One-Way 2 1 50 One Day Pass 4 N/A N/A 7-Day_Pass 8 5 3.75 31 Day Pass 25 15 15 Source: httPJ1www.citvofkevwest-fl.gov/350/Bus-Fares 115 Lower Keys Shuttle The lower keys shuttle runs between Historic Key West(Whitehead & Eaton)and Marathon (Mile Marker 53.5). Buses run every 2 hours. The lower keys shuttle has at least one stop within a mile from the Garrison Bight, Key West Bight, and the Port of Key West docking facilities. There are multiple transfer points from the shuttle stops to all three Key West local Bus lines (North, South, and Duval Loop). Table 8-8: Lower Keys Shuttle-Fare Pass Type Full Fare ($) Reduced Fare ($) Senior Fare ($) One_Way 4 2 1 One Day Pass'1111111 8 N/A ... N/A 7-Day_Pass 25 15 15 31-Day Pass 75 45 45 Source:http.11www.citvofkevwest-fl.gov/350/Bus-Fares Greyhound Bus There is a Full-Service Greyhound Bus Station located at 3439 South Roosevelt Boulevard adjacent to Key West International Airport. Greyhound runs a single round trip from Miami International Airport (MIA) to Key West seven days a week. Tickets start at $26 one-way and it is a four-hour trip. Greyhound buses departing via the Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach Stations run a line to the Miami Intermodal Center where riders can transfer to the MIA to Key West route. Bicycle Routes In 2018, 13.8 % of workers in Key West commuted to work by bicycle, which is well above the state average of 0.62%. Currently there are ten designated bike routes in the City of Key West, and they include the following: • Fleming Street between Whitehead Street &White Street • Southard Street between Whitehead Street &White Street • Eaton Street between Frances Street &White Street • Palm Avenue between Peary Court Road & Eisenhower Drive • White Street between Catherine Street & Laired Street • Northside Drive between Kennedy Drive & Toppino Drive • 14th Street between North Roosevelt Boulevard & Flagler Avenue • Flagler Street between Kennedy Drive & South Roosevelt Drive • Sigsbee Road between Gilmore Drive & the Entrance to Sigsbee Naval Base (within Naval Base) • College Road Between Lower Keys Medical Center and US 1 (North Stock Island) 116 • US 1 between South Roosevelt Road and College Road In addition, the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail starts northeast of the intersection of Eaton Street and Frances Street, along Palm Avenue and then north of US 1 from Eisenhower past Mile Marker 5 on Stock Island. Terminus Suitability Existing Infrastructure • Key West Bight Ferry Terminal — Key west has an existing, full service publicly owned ferry terminal with ample water depth/ berthing space. Currently, the ferry terminal accommodates larger passenger services to the Dry Tortugas (Yankee Freedom) and Fort Myers/Marco Island (Key West Express). • Key West Main Channel - Existing Federally maintained deep-water channel provides safe access to both the Port of Key West and Key West Bight. Last Mile Connectivity • Key West Transit's Duval Loop provides free public transportation in the last mile between the various docking facilities and the public transportation system. • There are multiple parking lots and structures near the major docking facilities. Ridership Demand A large percentage of tourists driving to Key West every year is a potential market for alternative transportation via water. Potential Benefits • System Resiliency - Adding a water-transportation alternative would provide redundancy in transportation system in the event there is a long-term roadway closure on the Overseas Highway. • Emergency Management - Potential incorporation into FEMA Hurricane Evacuation Program. • Funding - Documented existing and continued increase in traffic congestion may justify federal support and grants to develop water transportation services. Constraints Hazards to Navigation • Boating hazards outside the main ship channel including shifting sandbars, seagrass beds and coral reefs and live hardbottom. • Additional repeat transit services could result in the need for additional Aids to Navigation (requires state/federal permit authorization) 117 • Dangerous night navigation during Crab/Lobster Season due to abundant fishing gear in larger channels. Protected Areas • Department of Defense (DOD)- USACE No Entry/DOD restricted areas in portions of Key West Bight, Port of Key West (outer mobile Pier), and Garrison Bight. • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) - All surrounding waters are within the boundary of the Sanctuary. o FKNMS restricts speed in Wildlife Management Zones ("idle speed only/no wake" zone; "no-motor" zone; "no-access buffer"; and "closed" zone) o FKNMS may require authorization to run a commercial ferry service within the Sanctuary Protected Species • West Indian Manatee - Potential need to re-initiate consultation for existing docking facilities. • Acropora Critical Habitat-Water off the south side of Key West are within the boundaries of Acropora Critical Habitat. However, the designated habitat does not extend into either the Key West Bight or Garrison Bight channels. • Loggerhead Sea Turtle Critical Habitat - All waters on the south side of Key West are within the boundaries of both Migratory and Breeding Critical Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles. However, the designated habitat does not extend into either the Key West Bight or Garrison Bight channels. • American Crocodile Consultation Area - All waters including navigation channels are within boundary of American Crocodile Consultation Area. • Florida Keys Imperiled Species- Imperiled Species Focus area for Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi); Key tree-cactus(Pilosocereus robinii), and Stock Island tree snail (Orthalicus reses). 118 7.7.2 Stock Island Stock Island is located between Key West and Boca Chica Key. The northern portion of the island was incorporated into the City of Key West. The remaining portion of the island south of US 1 makes up Stock Island. Stock Island lies between US 1 Mile Markers 4 and 6. Existing US 1 Level of Service According to FDOT generalized LOS criteria, the US 1 segments on Stock Island experience congestion and unacceptable LOS based on 2019 traffic data. Passenger Pool Residents In 2017, over 54% of trips originating from Stock Island ended in Key West while 39% started and ended on Stock Island. Of the other trips that ended on Stock Island, 12% started on Boca Chica Key, 7.1% started on Big Pine and 2.8% started in central Dade County. Tourists There are two primary hotel/accommodations on Stock Island: Stock Island Village Marina and Oceans Edge Resort& Marina. Both of these facilities cater to Boat/Yacht cruisers and both offer hourly shuttle (bus) service to Key West. Stock Island Village Marina also has a 100-room luxury hotel. Water Access Stock Island Channel Runs from the Straits of Florida to a point in Hawk Channel just southeast of Stock Island and the entrance to Safe Harbor. Safe Harbor A medium-draft harbor on the south side of Stock Island, under the jurisdiction of the Monroe County Port Authority. The harbor is entered from Hawk Channel through a privately dredged channel with a reported minimum depth of 18 feet. Safe Harbor (Spur) A deep waterway east of Safe Harbor that leads to a large marina (Oceans Edge) on the southeast end of Stock Island. Cow Key Channel A narrow channel between Stock Island and Key West. 119 Table 8-9: Waterways-Stock Island Waterway Min Depth (ft) Max Vertical Clearance (ft) Safe Harbor Channel 1, 18 - Stock Island Channel 9 _60 Cow Key Channel 3 25 .. Safe Harbor Spur 17 - Source:NOAA Coast Pilot Volume 4, 52nd Edition Docking Facilities Currently there are no public marinas on Stock Island. There are eight commercial marinas on Stock Island and another 4 residential marinas along with a large number of commercial fishing vessel moorings. Table 8-10: Existing Docking Facilities-Stock Island Min Max Facility Name Depth Length Type Parking Waterway (ft) (ft) Oceans Edge 10 140 Private Private Safe Harbor (Spur) Stock Island Village 17 450 Private Private Safe Harbor Marina Cow Key Marina - 30 Private Private Cow Key Channel Hurricane Hole 6 45 Private Private Cow Key Channel ... Safe Harbour 14 160 Private Private Safe Harbor Robbie's of Key West 15 400 Private Private Safe Harbor Murray Marine 4 46 Private Private Boca Chica Channel Boyd's Key West 4 30 Private None Boca Chica Channel Campground .... ............... .... 120 �y,t ab .i ib[an1GHl Ell"d17 - YvEurray.k�aCPrE�elSa�to�`'8s"SerV ECG as H+hw - l ' � � tae�i A®rn,e Key Wp t City „; C,clf�tu�ry -Stock Island , H(.rricaine-H61°"��tt'�i"r i'9 ,w 1st Avenue 2rdAv e.. a ,Co1;Key Marina a Naval Hospital ... -Key West ° hfsa yz F ry } Safe Harbor Marina k 1 v $^ Uth Avenue tc 1--i 76 F`LAIA i 'v, � F..�1bmE Sf'6& MaP'llla V6tte#ge ai Avenue V 1 12th Avon'9" Ej ro - Oceanside Marina(Stock istand) Thompson Island t t Salt e0nds Condb ninilims Robbins F€att Services Marine i, 4 � i r Figure 8-4: Stock Island Peripheral Services Stock Island is currently serviced by two existing City bus routes: Key West City Route and Lower Keys Shuttle Key West City Route Key West Transit's City Route has two routes that provide services to Stock Island. The North line runs from Historic Key West (Truman & Emma) to the Northern Side of Stock Island (College Road Key West Transit). Buses run every 1.3 hours Monday thru Friday plus a shortened schedule on the weekend. None of the North line bus stops are within 1 mile of State or Safe Harbor. The South line runs between Historic Key West and South Stock Island. Buses run every 1.3 hours Monday thru Friday plus a shortened schedule on the weekend. The south line has a stop at Florida Keys International Airport. There are two bus stops within 1 mile of the at least one of Stock Island's Harbors: • 5t" Avenue & Shrimp Road (No shelters or services) • 4t" Avenue & Front Street (No shelters or services) A summary of Key West City Route fares is listed in Table 8-7. 121 Lower Keys Shuttle The Lower Keys Shuttle runs between Historic Key West (Whitehead & Eaton) and Marathon (Mile Marker 53.5). Buses run every 2 hours. The two nearest stops include: • US 1 and 3rd Street (Northbound) • East College Road and US 1 (Southbound) Neither of these stops are within 1 mile of the Stock Island Harbors. A summary of the Lower Keys Shuttle fares is listed in Table 8-8. Bicycle Routes In 2018, 4.4% of workers in Stock Island commuted to work by bicycle, which is more than 4 times the state average. Stock Island has five bike routes. • 5th Street between US 1 & Cow Key (South Island) • 5th Avenue between 5th Street & Maloney Avenue (South Island) • Cross Street between US 1 and 12th Avenue (South Island) • McDonald Avenue/Maloney Avenue between US 1 and 4th Avenue (South Island) • US 1 between Key West and Boca Chica Key Terminus Suitability Existing Infrastructure • Multiple private docking facilities in the area could accommodate a smaller ferry"shuttle" • Potential public/private partnership between Monroe County and Marina Resorts (ex. Oceans Edge or Stock Island Village Marina) Distance to Key West • Stock Island is less than 10 miles from Key West by water making use of a smaller (40-60 feet) ferry and more frequent ferry service possible. The shorter distance reduces the impact of adverse weather/water conditions. Last Mile Connectivity Stock Island has existing last-mile connectivity including Key West City Route Bus (South Line) and designated bike lanes. Ridership Demand • A ferry shuttle/taxi from Stock Island to Key West could benefit the Marina Resort guests. • A ferry shuttle/taxi could bring customers including cruise ship passengers from Key West to Marina resort commercial restaurants and shops. 122 • A ferry shuttle/taxi could connect large percentage of Stock Island residents who commute daily for work in Key West. Potential Benefits Ferry service would minimize the number of local trips between Key West and Stock Island, thus reducing the overall traffic on US 1. Community Resources Large Commercial Fishery • Fishing boats/facilities are a potential tourist attraction for visitors to Key West. • Landings create potential to develop local fish market. Constraints Hazards to Navigation • Hazards outside the main ship channel including shifting sandbars, seagrass beds and coral reefs and live hardbottom. • Additional repeat transit services could result in need for additional Aids to Navigation (requires state/federal permit authorization) • Dangerous night navigation during Crab/Lobster Season due to abundant fishing gear in larger channels. Existing Infrastructure • There is no public docking facility/marina on Stock Island • Constructing a new marina facility would be challenging due to county marina siting criteria and the existing land use in the area including conservation. • Any new landside facilities will have to comply with stringent FEMA flood standards. Permitting Any changes to a dock/slip or terminal to accommodate a larger ferry will likely require a state Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and a federal USACE Permit (10/404). Community Resources Potential conflict of use between commercial fisheries and ferry services. Outreach and input from stakeholders will be key to ensuring a compatible relationship. Protected Areas • Department of Defense - Entire area south of US 1 on Stock Island is within the Key West Naval Air Station Military Installation Area of Impact. Safe Harbor channels are also adjacent to a USACE Danger Zone on the southwestern shore of Boca Chica Key. 123 • USFWS Coastal Barrier Resource System - Portions Stock Island (Unit FL-57) is protected under the Coastal Barrier Resource System Act which prohibits the use of federal dollars to develop designated areas. Unit FL-57 includes a portion of the western edge of Safe Harbor channel. • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS) -All surrounding waters are within the boundary of the Sanctuary. o FKNMS restricts speed in Wildlife Management Zones ("idle speed only/no wake"zone; "no-motor"zone; "no-access buffer'; and "closed"zone) o FKNMS may require authorization to run a commercial ferry service within the Sanctuary o The Sanctuary is a "no discharge zone"meaning vessels cannot empty their waste tank in waters and must use designated pump-out facilities. Protected Species • West Indian Manatee- Potential need to re-initiate consultation for existing docking facilities. • Benthic Resources-All waters on southside of Stock Island including Safe Harbor channel have extensive coverage of live hardbottom including federally protected coral species as well as seagrasses. • Acropora Critical Habitat- All waters on the southside of Stock Island are within southside of Key West the boundaries of Acropora Critical Habitat. However, the designated Acropora Critical Habitat does not extend into Safe Harbor channels. • Loggerhead Sea Turtle Critical Habitat- All waters on the south side of Stock Island including Safe Harbor channels are within the boundaries of both Migratory and Breeding Critical Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles. • American Crocodile Consultation Area- All waters including navigation channels are within boundary of American Crocodile Consultation Area. Work and structures affecting the shoreline could require consultation with USFWS. • Florida Keys Imperiled Species- Imperiled Species Focus area for Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi); Key tree-cactus (Pilosocereus robinii), and Stock Island tree snail (Orthalicus reses). • Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) - Five types of EFH are found in Safe Harbor and the Safe Harbor Spur. Work and structures affecting waters, structures or benthic substrate could require consultation with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Habitat Conservation Division (HCD). 124 7.7.3 Marathon Marathon is located at the mid-point of the Florida Keys along US 1 between Duck Key and Little Duck Key. It lies between US 1 Mile Marker 46 and 60. Existing US 1 Level of Service According to FDOT generalized LOS criteria, some of the US 1 segments on Marathon experience congestion and unacceptable LOS based on 2019 traffic data. Passenger pool Residents In 2017, 59.4% of work trips originating in Marathon ended in Marathon. Approximately 6.6% of work trips originating in Marathon ended in Key West. The largest percentage of work trips ending in Marathon were those trips originating in Key West (15.5%) and Miami (6.6%). Tourists In 2018, Marathon attracted 816,023 visitors who spent over $457 million in Marathon.' The average stay in 2018 in was 2.83 nights.4 Water Access Moser Channel Moser Channel supports vessels with a maximum of 7 to 8-foot draft and runs between the Florida Straits and Florida Bay. It is the junction point where boaters in the Intracoastal Waterway can continue on the Gulf side route or cross under the seven-mile bridge just southwest of Marathon into Hawks channel towards Key West. The current highway bridge has a 65-foot clearance. Boot Key Harbor Channel Boot Key is a sheltered harbor on the Atlantic side of US1 between Marathon and Boot Key. The entrance channel is a congressionally authorized and federally maintained channel with an authorized control depth of 12 feet. The channel depth becomes more shallow (minimum of 7 feet) east of 20th street. Table 8-11: Waterways- Marathon Waterway Min Depth (ft) Max Vertical Clearance (ft) Boot Key Harbor 7 .... 24 Moser Channel 5 65 Key Vaca Cut 12 13 Knight Key Channel 8 19 Source:NOAA Coast Pilot Volume 4, 52nd Edition 3 (Rockport Analytics,LLC,2019) '(Monroe County Tourism Development Council(TDC),2019) 125 Docking Facilities There is currently only one public marina on Marathon: Boot Key Harbor City Marina. Table 8-12: Existing Docking Facilities-Marathon Name Min Max Facility parking Waterway Depth (ft) Length (ft) Type Burdines Marina 7 60 Private Private Boot Key Harbor Pancho's Marina and 7 55 Private Private Boot Key Harbor Fuel Dock ... Marathon Marina 9 125 Private Private Boot Key Harbor Boot Key Harbor City 10 50 Public Public Boot Key Harbor Marina Keys Fisheries Market 6 50 Private Private Florida Bay and Marina Shelter Bay Marina 5 34 Private Private Atlantic Ocean .... .... Keys Boat Worley Keys Fisheries Martk,et`and Marina � Mara i Gni Jesse iti l a flh o n e�e�o t°» 3tar(e wdl�M Holtr MarinaJunckioor u r Y^ f r7rPc J f a Fanny Keys Palm Island Donrontary Nt9n�sy school e+soas asr� Seafood {> iro ianku itr s t Fa.,,;ival 2014 n i f 7 Mite Mariner t ro Sn ram t 6.t-fie t Martl"?n g t,x.n YG1,;b U 5 CaastGnarcl ft y t�ti=rrt a Stator ne arathon r&i ft s r y e t' o, z° g . ` . �id =MrtonoaCYscM1 ondofiSinurns e id Marat'howMal ina and Boatyard F F ,neho Fool Cock Marathon MidIdle and ant' Pvtn,.r Itigti uGh(>nl.,,,,.. Figure 8-5: Boot Key Harbor 126 Peripheral Services Miami Dade Transit Route 301 (Dade-Monroe Express) runs from Florida City in Dade County to Mile Marker 50 on US 1 in Marathon. Buses run 7 days a week and up to 12 times a day during the workweek. Greyhound Bus There is a full-service Greyhound Bus Station located at 9400 Overseas Highway in Marathon. Greyhound runs a single round trip from the Miami International Airport (MIA) to Key West with a stop in Marathon, seven days a week. Tickets start at $26 one-way and it is a four-hour trip. Greyhound buses departing via the Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach Stations run a line to the Miami Intermodal Center where riders can transfer to the MIA to Key west route. Lower Keys Shuttle The lower keys shuttle runs between Historic Key West(Whitehead & Eaton)and Marathon (Mile Marker 53.5). Buses run every 2 hours. The two nearest stops include: 36' Street(Park)and 33ra Street (FHP). A summary of the Lower Keys Shuttle fares is listed in Table 8-8. Bicycle Routes In 2018, 2.9% of Marathon residents commuted to work by bicycle. There are seven designated bike routes in Marathon: • US 1 between the 7-mile Bridge (Public Parking Lot) & 30' Street Ocean • US 1 between 51st Street Gulf& 60' Street Gulf(Lower Keys and Dade Monroe Express Stop with Shelter) • US 1 between 125t" Street Gulf& Mile Marker 53.6 • US 1 between Mile Maker 53.6 & Coral Lane • US 1 between Mile Marker 54 & Mile Marker 57.4 • US 1 between Mile Marker 59.7 and Mile Maker 60.5 • Ocean Drive West between 12th Street & 6th Street on Key Colony Beach In addition, the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail runs parallel to US1 from the 7-mile bridge to Guava Avenue. 127 Terminus Suitability Existing Infrastructure Florida Keys Marathon International Airport Marathon has an active airport capable of servicing commercial airlines and onsite US Customs and Immigration. The Marathon Airport provides centralized public transportation connections, rental car services and ample public parking. Boot Key Harbor City Marina The City of Marathon manages a public marina and anchorage area in Boot Key Harbor. The channel entrance into Boot Key Harbor is a Federally maintained Channel (National Channel Framework). Geographic Location Marathon is Midpoint for any service from Key West to Miami and is easily accessible from both Intracoastal Waterway (Gulf of Mexico) and Hawk Channel (Atlantic Ocean). Last Mile Connectivity Two Lower Keys Shuttle stops are within "Last Mile" of Boot Key City Harbor (36th Street and 33rd Street) Community Resources A large local fish market is located directly opposite the Boot Harbor City Marina on the northside of US1. Comprehensive Plan Marathons' 2005 Comprehensive Plans (Policy 7-2.2.3) identified development of marine travel as part of the city's transportation goals. The plan identified local and regional ferries as well as water taxis as a viable transportation option that could relieve congestion from US 1 and serve as a potential source of revenue for the area. The plan recommended adoption of a harbor management program that could develop the existing Boot Key Harbor City Marina as a potential intermodal connection between surface transportation and regional water transportation. s(City of Marathon Planning Department,2013) 128 Constraints Hazards to Navigation Hazards to navigation outside the main channels including a large mooring field shifting sandbars, seagrass beds and coral live hardbottom. Aids to Navigation —Additional repeat transit services could result in need for additional Aids to Navigation (requires state/federal permit authorization) Dangerous night navigation during Crab/Lobster Season due to abundant fishing gear in larger channels. Distance to Key West Marathon is approximately 50 miles from Key West by either road or water. According to Google Maps, the trip takes an hour by car. A vessel would need to be capable of traveling over 43 knots per hour to travel the same distance by water. Typically, a medium length (60-100 ft), high-speed catamaran ferries can travel in the range of 20-25 knots. Large (>100 ft) high-speed catamaran ferries travel upwards of 30-35 knots fully loaded. Existing Infrastructure • Use of Boot Key City Marina will require upgrades to landside facilities and docking to support repeat use vessels and passengers. • Water Depth—The channel depth in Boot Key Harbor drops to a minimum of 7 feet which could limit access for a larger passenger ferry (>100 ft). Permitting • Changes to the marina will likely require a state Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and a Federal USACE Permit (10/404). • Channel modifications to accommodate larger vessel could require channel deepening which is prohibited in the Florida Keys under state regulation, "No docking facilities shall be approved which require either dredging or filling to provide access by canal, channel, road, or any other means. This restriction shall also apply to widening or deepening any existing canal or channel, but not to regular maintenance dredging of existing canals, basins, or channels, providing such maintenance does not exceed currently acceptable water depths." (F.A.C. 18-21.0041) • Changes or upgrades to landside facilities will have to comply with FEMA flood standards. • Constructing a new marina facility would challenging due to county marina siting criteria and the existing land use in the area including conservation. 129 Protected Areas • USFWS Coastal Barrier Resource System - Portions of Marathon (Unit FL-46; FL - 45, and FL - 44) are protected under the Coastal Barrier Resource System Act which prohibits the use of federal dollars to develop in those areas. The FL-46 unit includes a portion of Boot Key Harbor, but not the public city marina. • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) -All surrounding waters are within the boundary of the Sanctuary. • FKNMS restricts speed in Wildlife Management Zones ("idle speed only/no wake" zone; "no-motor" zone; "no-access buffer"; and "closed" zone) • FKNMS may require authorization to run a commercial ferry service within the Sanctuary • The Sanctuary is a "no discharge zone" meaning vessels cannot empty their waste tank in waters and must use designated pump-out facilities. Protected Resources • West Indian Manatee - Potential need to re-initiate consultation for existing docking facilities. • Benthic Resources — Boot Key Harbor has extensive coverage of live hardbottom including federally protected coral species as well as seagrasses. • Acropora Critical Habitat- All waters on the southside of Boot Key are within the boundaries of Acropora Critical Habitat. However designated area does not extend into Boot Key Harbor. • Loggerhead Sea Turtle Critical Habitat- All waters including Boot Key Harbor are within the boundaries of both Migratory and Breeding Critical Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles. • American Crocodile Consultation Area - All waters including navigation channels are within boundary of American Crocodile Consultation Area. Work and structures affecting the shoreline could require consultation with USFWS. • Florida Keys Imperiled Species- Imperiled Species Focus area for Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi); Key tree-cactus (Pilosocereus robinii), and Stock Island tree snail (Orthalicus reses). • Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) - Five types of EFH are found in Safe Harbor and the Safe Harbor Spur. Work and structures affecting waters, structures or benthic substrate could require consultation with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Habitat Conservation Division (HCD). 130 7.7.4 Islamorada Islamorada is located in the upper Florida Keys between Tavernier and Craig Key. It lies along US 1 between Mile Marker 73 and 91. Existing US 1 Level of Service According to FDOT generalized LOS criteria, some of the US 1 segments in Islamorada experience congestion and unacceptable LOS based on 2019 traffic data. Passenger Pool Residents In, 2017, 58% of work trips originating in Islamorada ended in Islamorada. Approximately 7% of work trips originating in Islamorada ended in Miami. The largest percentage of work trips ending in Islamorada were those trips originating in Key Largo (19%). Tourists In 2018, Islamorada attracted 685,000 visitors who spent over $248 million in Islamorada.6 The average stay in 2018 in 2.85 nights.' Water Access The public marina on Islamorada (Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina) is the only one of the four termini that is located on the Florida Bay side of the keys. Tea Table Key Relief Channel The Tea Table Key Relief Channel is a shallow(3-foot minimum depth)channel on the southwest end of Upper Matecumbe Key. Snake Creek Snake Creek is a minimum 4-foot deep channel running between Plantation Key and Windley Key. Tavernier Creek Tavernier Creek runs between Tavernier Key and Plantation key. It has a minimum depth of 4 feet. 6(Rockport Analytics,LLC,2019) (Monroe County Tourism Development Council(TDC),2019) 131 Table 8-13: Waterways- Islamorada Waterway Min Depth (ft) Max Vertical Clearance (ft) Snake Creek 4 27 ..... ... ..... ..._ . .. .... Tavernier Creek 4 15 Cowpens Anchorage 6 - Teatable Key Relief 3 7 Channel ..... .... ..... ............. Docking Facilities There is currently only one public marina in Islamorada: Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina. Table 8-14: Existing Docking Facilities-Islamorada Min Max Facility Name Depth Length Type1 Parking Waterway (ft) (ft) Caloosa Cove Marina and Resort 4 60 Private Private Atlantic Ocean Bud-N-Mary's Fishing 4.5 45 Private Private Teatable Key Relief Marina Channel Plantation Yacht Harbor 5 80 Public I Public Cowpens Marina -IIIIIIIIIIIIIII (Fee) Anchorage Bay Side Marine _3___ 40_______ Private Private Florida Bay _ - Coral Bay Marina 5 62 Private Private Florida Bay Safe Harbor-Islamorada 4.5 55 Private Private Florida Bay pintauan Kay f t /r F, Plttt-taf n l WS t ,cniKet j` U rv, NwitatiGn Yae#rt N,artia and Res�rk.^ 3L tJa nNc. Cotian Key, US 1" U.S.uu31" Guard Stakon Is1e.laracia 11 r Key i`d I it. rlc us Wllso i Key f US` Figure 8-6: North Islamorada 132 Peripheral Services Miami Dade Transit Miami-Dade Transit Route 301 (Dade-Monroe Express) runs from Florida City in Miami-Dade County to Mile Marker 50 on US 1 in Marathon. Buses run 7 days a week and up to 21 times a day during the workweek. Freebee-Free Ride Share The Village of Islamorada runs free ride-share with Freebee (electronic transportation). User can request a ride by phone or a request via app. Services run Tuesday thru Sunday (70 hour/week). Greyhound Bus There is a Greyhound Bus stop located at 82201 Overseas Highway in Islamorada. Greyhound runs a single round trip from the Miami International Airport (MIA) to Key West seven days a week. Tickets start at $26 one-way and it is a four-hour trip. Greyhound buses departing via the Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach Stations run a line to the Miami Intermodal Center where riders can transfer to the MIA to Key West route. Bicycle Routes In 2018, less than 1% of workers in Islamorada commuted to work by bicycle: lowest of the four termini. There are 4 designated bike routes on Islamorada. • US 1 between Mile Marker 73 & Iroquois Drive • US 1 between Mile Marker 77.5 & Tavernier Creek • Venetian Boulevard between Bay View Isle Drive and US 1 • Royal Poinciana Avenue Between Bougainvillea Street & US 1. In addition, the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail runs parallel to US1 between Mile Marker 73 and Mile Marker 90. Terminus Suitability Existing Infrastructure Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina - Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina is a public facility, owned and managed by the Village of Islamorada. The landside area is large public park with multiple recreation facilities and services. Last Mile Connectivity There is an unsheltered bus stop adjacent to the Islamorada Visitor Center that is within walking distance (< .4 mile) of the marina facility. Buses along the Miami-Dade County Transit Route 301 run 7 days a week. Time between buses varies from 30 minutes to 1.5 hours depending on the time of day. 133 The Village of Islamorada runs a free ride-share service with Freebee. Users can request a ride by phone or a request via app. Services run Tuesday thru Sunday (70 hour/week). Potential Benefits Several portions of US 1 in Islamorada experience an LOS D or E. As such any reduction in traffic along US 1 will improve the level of service. Constraints Hazards to Navigation • Hazards to navigation outside the main ship channel including shifting sandbars, seagrass beds and coral reefs and live hardbottom. • Aids to Navigation —Additional repeat transit services could result in need for additional Aids to Navigation (requires state/federal permit authorization) • Fishing Gear— Dangerous night navigation during Crab/Lobster Season due to abundant fishing gear in larger channels. Distance to Key West Islamorada is approximately 90 miles from Key West by water. A car can travel (87 miles) from upper Islamorada to Key West in a little under two hours (109 minutes). A vessel would have to travel approximately 37 knots to travel 90 miles by water. Typically, a medium length (60-100 ft), high-speed catamaran ferries can travel in the range of 20-25 knots. Large (>100 ft) high-speed catamaran ferries travel upwards of 30-35 knots fully loaded. Existing Infrastructure • Landside Facilities and Docking- Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina will require upgrades to landside facilities and docking to support repeat use vessels and passengers. • Minimum Water Depth- Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina, the deepest of the Marina's on Islamorada, has a minimum control depth of only 5 feet which may limit access for a larger passenger ferry (>100 ft). Permitting • Changes to the marina will likely require a state Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and a Federal USACE Permit (10/404). • Channel modifications to accommodate larger vessel could require channel deepening which is prohibited in the Florida Keys under state regulation, "No docking facilities shall be approved which require either dredging or filling to provide access by canal, channel, road, or any other means. This restriction shall also apply to widening or deepening any existing 134 canal or channel, but not to regular maintenance dredging of existing canals, basins, or channels, providing such maintenance does not exceed currently acceptable water depths." (18-21.0041, FAC, Florida Keys Marina and Dock Siting Policies and Criteria) • Changes or upgrades to landside facilities will have to comply with FEMA flood standards. Protected Areas • USFWS Coastal Barrier Resource System— Portions of Islamorada (Unit FL-40) are protected under the Coastal Barrier Resource System Act which prohibits the use of federal dollars to develop in those areas. Unit FL-40 includes a portion of Cotton Key Basin, but not Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina. • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) - All surrounding waters are within the boundary of the Sanctuary. • FKNMS restricts speed in Wildlife Management Zones ("idle speed only/no wake" zone; "no-motor" zone; "no-access buffer"; and "closed" zone) • FKNMS may require authorization to run a commercial ferry service within the Sanctuary • The Sanctuary is a "no discharge zone" meaning vessels cannot empty their waste tank in waters and must use designated pump-out facilities. Protected Resources • West Indian Manatee - Potential need to re-initiate consultation for existing docking facilities. • Benthic Resources —Cotton Key Basin has extensive coverage of live hardbottom including federally protected coral species as well as seagrasses. • Acropora Critical Habitat- All waters on the southside of Islamorada are within the boundaries of Acropora Critical Habitat. The habitat boundary does not extend to the Gulf of Mexico side of Islamorada including Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina • Loggerhead Sea Turtle Critical Habitat- All waters on the Atlantic Ocean side of Islamorada are within the boundaries of both Migratory and Breeding Critical Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles. The habitat boundary does not extend to the Gulf of Mexico side of Islamorada including Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina • American Crocodile Critical Habitat- All waters on the Gulf of Mexico side of Islamorada including Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina are within the designated boundary of American Crocodile Critical Habitat. Work and structures affecting the shoreline could require consultation with USFWS. • Cape Sable Thoroughwort Critical Habitat— Islamorada is within designated Cape Sable Thoroughwort Critical Habitat. However, Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina falls outside the designated areas. 135 • Florida Keys Imperiled Species- Imperiled Species Focus area for Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi); Schaus Swallowtail (Papilio aristodemus), Key tree-cactus (Pilosocereus robinii), and Stock Island tree snail (Orthalicus reses). 136 7.7.5 Miami (Coconut Grove) Coconut Grove is located southeast of downtown Miami on the south side of South Dixie Highway(US 1) in the City of Miami. Like Key West, Coconut Grove has free transportation from all the waterside facilities with routes to adjacent hotels and restaurants as well as the two nearby Metrorail stations making the site one of the most connected areas in the region. Miami-Dade County water transportation studies have repeatedly identified Dinner Key as a potential ferry terminal. It is also the location for the next proposed Miami Poseidon Ferry stop making it an ideal water transportation connector to both downtown Miami and Miami Beach. Existing US 1 Level of Service Despite extensive land-based transit resource, more than half of the intersections along the US 1 Corridor between Kendall Drive and 1-95 are already operating at an LOS F during AM and PM peak hours.' Water Access Hawks Channel Hawks Channel extends northeast from Key West (127 miles) to Cape Florida. Water depths in the channel vary from 9 to 34 feet with a minimum channel width of 0.25 mile. Dinner Key Channel Dinner Key Channel runs northwest from central Biscayne Bay into Dinner Key Marina. Depth at the channel entrance is 8 feet with a 7-foot minimum in the yacht basin. Cape Florida Channel The Cape Florida Channel extends from Hawk Channel on the south side of Key Biscayne and into Biscayne Bay. Table 8-15: Waterways-Miami Waterway Min Depth (ft) Max Vertical Clearance (ft) Hawk Channel 9 No limit .... C�Florida Channel 7 No limit _.._ Dinner Key Channel 7 No limit s (Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT),2019). 137 Docking Facilities Miami-Dade County has hundreds of docking facilities. For the purpose of this report, evaluation of Miami terminus locations was limited to one facility: City of Miami's Dinner Key Marina located in Coconut Grove. I"I J63 ;63 U5441 p3 r J3s " l i� uT m v gg ,c I r k U541 I U541 U641 f� �- ` 51 5` sl c i I o s„enUoan �� S tT.+Xi3 nio e us I s i Is�,i.use F r21 i•V `� r ]Hzi h6 3 F ass .wv ' FL 970 J � He bt el �[-yPo r a DINNEI+KEYMAre1NA/8OAI YARD to+s Figure 8-7: Dinner Key Marina, Coconut Grove, Miami Peripheral Services Coconut Grove Trolley A City of Miami free bus service runs every 15 to 30 minutes between the Douglas Road Metrorail station and the 271" Avenue Metrorail station and includes stops along Dinner Key and the hotels, restaurants and shops in Coconut Grove. 138 Metrorail The Orange line runs every 15 minutes between Miami International Airport Transit Center and 27tn Avenue Stations.A one-way ticket is$2.25 (Discount ticket is $1.10). Trains run every 7 to 10 minutes, seven days a week from 5 AM to 10 PM. Greyhound The Miami International Airport Greyhound Station is located at the Miami Intermodal Center. Greyhound buses departing via the Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach Stations run a line to the Miami Intermodal Center. Bicycle Routes There is a bike lane along Southwest 27t" Avenue between South Bayshore Drive and US 1. There is also a designated bike path (M-PATH)that runs under the entire Metrorail line from Downtown (SW 1st Avenue and the Miami River) to Dadeland Mall in South Miami (9.4 miles). Terminus Suitability Existing Infrastructure • Dinner Key Marina is the largest wet slip facility in Florida (582 slips) and can accommodate vessels up to 300 feet in length. • Adjacent to Florida Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail and other recreational opportunities. Ridership Demand • Large number of hotels/vacation rentals, restaurants and shops makes it one of largest tourist destinations in the City of Miami. • Close proximity to people living in Coral Gables, Brickell, South Miami, and Key Biscayne, who are likely to visit the Keys and typically drive a vehicle. Last Mile Connectivity • Land Transportation Connectivity - Free shuttle service connectivity between Marina and Metrorail. - Metrorail provides direct connectivity to regional transportation facilities, including Miami International Airport and the Airport Intermodal Center which houses the Greyhound Bus Station and the Regional Commuter Train System (TriRail). • Water Transportation Connectivity- Planned expansion of Poseidon Ferry Service from Miami and Miami Beach to Coconut Grove in the Fall of 2021. 139 Constraints Hazards to Navigation • Hazards to navigation outside the main ship channel including shifting sandbars and seagrass beds. • Additional repeat transit services could result in need for additional Aids to Navigation (requires state/federal permit authorization) • Dangerous night navigation during Crab/Lobster Season due to abundant fishing gear in larger channels. • Speed Restrictions - State Manatee Speed Zone- Slow Speed (All Year) Existing Infrastructure Dinner Key Marina is still in the process of making repairs to the facility due to damage from Hurricane Irma in 2017. The repair work is scheduled to be completed in 2021. Protected Areas • Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve - Part of Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve and an Outstanding Florida Waters Area. • Biscayne National Park- Both bayside Intracoastal route and oceanside Hawk Channel runs through Biscayne National Park. A commercial use permit from the National Park Service may be required to run ferry service through the park. Protected Resources • Benthic Resources - Key Biscayne including in/around Dinner Key Marina has dense seagrass beds. • Biologically Important Area • Dinner Key Marina is within Biologically Important Area for Cetaceans including Bottlenose Dolphins • West Indian Manatee • All waters adjacent to Dinner Key are Manatee Critical Habitat. • Potential need to re-initiate consultation for existing docking facilities. • American Crocodile Consultation Area - All waters included are within boundary of American Crocodile Consultation Area. Work and structures affecting the shoreline could require consultation with USFWS. 140 7.8 Funding Resources 7.8.1 Maritime Administration (MARAD) Marine Highway Program The US Department of Transportation (DOT)'s Maritime Administration is responsible for the nations maritime transportation system and industry (includes domestic ship building). In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on the development of America's navigable waterways including channels, bays, and harbors and improved connectivity between those water "highways" and the greater land and air transportation systems. In response to this, DOT enacted the Marine Highway Program in 2010 (46 CFR § 393).9 The goal of the program is, "...to develop and integrate these services into the overall transportation system in a self-sustaining, commercially-viable manner that also recognizes the public benefits these services create. The Marine Highway will enable more goods and people to travel by water where possible, striking a more equitable capacity balance between highway, rail and Marine Highway surface routes, making it more likely our country will realize the benefits sought by the Congress (46 CFR §393)." Public entities can apply through their designated gateway office requesting designation as a corridor, connector or crossing (46 CFR 393.4 (e)). A Marine Highway Corridor is defined as, "A water transportation route that serves as an extension of the surface transportation system that can help mitigate congestion-related impacts along a specified land transportation route. It is identified and described in terms of the land transportation route that it supplements, and must, by transporting freight or passengers, provide measurable benefits to the surface transportation route in the form of traffic reductions, reduced emissions, energy savings, improved safety, system resiliency, and/or reduced infrastructure costs." Benefits to the designation include preferential treatment from DOT and MARAD, potential funding assistance, and other support services from the designated gateway office. 7.8.2 Capital Construction Fund The capital construction fund (CCF) provides increased access to capital for the construction and replacement of American-Flag Vessels.10 The program provides, "...deferment of Federal income https://www.maritime.dot.gov/grants/marine-highways/marine-highwaX 0 https://www.maritime.dot.gov/grants/capital-construction-fund 141 taxes on certain deposits of money or other property placed into a CCF."Vessels funded must be built in USA. Table 8-16: Examples of some current CCF Fundholders ...... . . .. ..... Fundholder Industry Washington Island Ferry Line, Inc. Water Transportation Services Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Water Transportation Services Eastern Shipbuilding Group, Inc. Boat Builder 7.8.3 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) The FTA provides financial and technical support to local public transit systems. Passenger Ferry Grant Program Funding is made available to designated recipients that operate a public ferry system in an urbanized area. Eligible activities include establishing new ferry services and repair and modernization of ferry boasts, terminals, and related facilities and equipment. Funds may not be used for operating expenses, planning, or preventive maintenance." Funds cover up to a maximum of 80% of the project's total capital costs. Table 8-17: Examples of PFG Program Fund Allocations in the Last 5 Years Project Sponsor Grant Project 070,577 Construct a new ferry maintenance Chatham Area Transit Authority (GA) $2, 1 facility City of South Amboy (NJ) $5,300,000 a Construct new passenger ferry terminal Massachusetts Bay Transportation $6,050,000 Construct a new ferry dock. Authority (MA) ...... Casco Bay Island Transit District (ME) $3,200,000 Install a new electric hybrid propulsion system on existing ferry. New York City Department of $4,180,982 Maintenance of Staten Island Ferry Transportation (NY) Terminal Jacksonville Transportation Authority (FL) $5,241,791 Modernize existing passenger ferry vessel New bike facility and modernize Washington State DOT (WA) $6,000,000 terminal/vessel communication infrastructure " https://w�vnv.transit.dot.gov/passen eg r-ferr-grants 142 The State of Good Repair Grants Program (Section 5337) This grant provides capital assistance for, "maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation projects of high-intensity fixed guideway and bus systems to help transit agencies maintain assets in a state of good repair"... as well as, "for developing and implementing Transit Asset Management plans."12 Miami-Dade Transit is eligible for these types of grants. They fund state and local projects that, "maintain a fixed guideway or a high intensity motorbus system in a state of good repair." They may be able to support connectivity between ferry project and the larger metro Miami-Dade system, including stops in the Keys and intermodal facilities (ex. improving the Coconut Grove Metrorail station). Table 8-18: Miami, Florida Urban Area Section 5337 Fund Allocation Fiscal Year Guideway Motorbus 2020 1 $45,953,965 1 $0 2019 1 $47,938,978 $1,071,616 2018 $50,304,076 $1,084,733 8.1.1 FHWA Ferry Boats and Terminal Facilities Formula Program (FBP) This program allocates federal highway dollars to state transportation agencies for the, "...designing and constructing ferry boat"and for designing, acquiring right-of-way, and constructing ferry terminal facilities." Eligible projects include: • "...ferry boats and terminal facilities that serve vehicular travel as links on public highways (other than Interstate highways)", and • "...ferry boats and terminals only serving passengers as a fixed route transit facility, may be eligible for certain types of Federal-aid highway funding." • Maximum Federal Shale is 80% of any project. Examples of the types of previously eligible projects and fund allocation is outlined in Table 8-19. Table 8-19: Sample of 2018 FBP Fund Allocations Operator(STATE) Eligible Elements State Allocation St. Johns River Ferry (FL) Publicly owned Terminal & $499,635.00 Vessels Yankee Freedom (FL) Publicly owned Terminal only $25,639.00 12 https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/state-good-repair-grants-5337 143 Operator(STATE) Eligible Elements State Allocation Savannah Belles Ferry (GA) Publicly owned Terminal & $904,553.00 Vessels Washington State Ferries (WA) Publicly owned Terminal & $24,363,306.00 Vessels Louisiana Department of Transportation Publicly owned Terminal & $2,143,547.00 (LA) Vessels 7.8.4 Florida Inland Navigation District The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) is responsible the local sponsor for the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) project in Florida." FIND offers grants to local government to address issues with the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and other waterways in the district. However, FIND sponsorship does not extend to the IWW in Monroe County. 3 http://w�vnv.aicw.org//grants_and_assistance programs/index.php 144 7.9 Route Analysis The purpose of this report is to identify one or more potential water-based transit routes to/from Key West that may help alleviate traffic congestion on US 1 in the Florida Keys. Each of the four alternative termini involved a distinct community in Monroe County. The termini have been discussed in the preceding sections and each is briefly summarized below. Stock Island — The closest (<10 miles) and most interconnected community (socially/economically) with Key West. Stock Island has deepest waterways of the four alternatives but lacks its own public marina. A public/private partnership would be required to establish a ferry system. Two potential private facilities are the Stock Island Village Marina and the Ocean Edge marina resort. Marathon— Located approximately 50 Miles from Key West and it is the midpoint of the Florida Keys. It has its own international airport, a federally authorized and maintained channel (Boot Key Harbor entrance channel), and a city owned Marina (Boot Key City Marina). Islamorada - This village's northernmost key (Plantation) is more than 90 plus miles from Key West and hosts the city's only Marina (Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina). Miami — Dinner Key Marina is a City of Miami docking facility in Coconut Grove. It is more than 150 miles from Key West and provides direct last-mile connectivity to multiple types of land-based public transportation including Metrobus, Metrorail, Tri Rail, Brightline, and the three closest international airports (Miami International, Ft Lauderdale Hollywood International, and Palm Beach International). Assumptions Three key assumptions were made in orderto perform the schedule scheme analysis,which are briefly described below. Only trips To/From Key West This report only looked at four routes to/from Key West. Each was evaluated as a stand-alone option. Both Marathon and Islamorada may benefit from a smaller/shuttle water ferry service internally or to nearby communities that could help improve overall level of service on the US 1 corridor by providing alternative local commuter and tourist transportation options in areas with already poor levels of service on US 1. This is an area of potential future evaluation. Two Principal Routes This report assumes the two principal waterways could be used to navigate between Key West and each of the four termini. The characteristics of each channel are outlined below. 145 G Nanlx _ pemFaroke pines F kIXh t IX y P 3 rY(N—' f I N—r sY'rarxf f+xxdennu; NrsV01101 c. n Hialeah Miami 7 vY SvT 6,.cl Homes4ead'. EvtN;3t. NOE*haf Park Hawk star, xe . Channel 0 N Np Ya1J .af asr+ Intracaastat Waterway KOy NWe t Figure 8-8: Principal Routes Hawks Channel- Hawks Channel extends from Key West 127 nm northeast to Cape Florida. The total distance from Dinner Key to Key West via Hawk Channel over 133 nm. The channel is mostly a straight shot with few major turns or switchbacks. Hawk channel is located in open Atlantic Ocean, but landward of the Gulf Stream. Hawks Channel between Marathon and Key West is part of the Intracoastal Waterway and therefore has a maximum speed limit of 25 mph or 21.7 knots. Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) - The IWW in the Florida Keys extends southwest from Biscayne Bay, through Card Sound, Barnes Sound, Blackwater Sound, Buttonwood Sound and into Florida Bay before splitting into two routes. The Florida Bay side continues southwest to Big Spanish Channel to the Northwest Channel and into Key West Harbor (58 nm).14 The Southern route cuts through Moser Channel south into Hawk Channel where it continues southeast to the entrance to Key West Harbor (46 nm).The total distance on the Florida Bay side from Dinner Key to Key West is approximately 154 nm. Total distance on the gulf side with a cross to into Atlantic at split (west of Marathon) is approximately 142 nm. Vertical clearance is a consideration due to numerous bridges and aerial 14 (NOAA, 2020) 146 transmission lines along this route. The IWW has a maximum speed limit of 25 mph (21.7 Knots)which would limit the benefit of a larger, faster ferry for longer distances. Length of Route-Vessel Size A key assumption in this report is that the small vessels (40-60 feet) would not be suitable on routes longer 26 nm. Longer routes subject vessels to open water and weather conditions for an extended period. Smaller passenger vessels lack the size and stability necessary to safely and comfortably navigate in rough seas or poor weather. Length of Route - Passenger Capacity This report assumes longer routes also take longer and thus will inevitably have less trips. Less trips means the ferries themselves must accommodate a higher passenger capacity. More passengers mean bigger boats. Facility For the purpose of this study, where available, public facilities were used as the preferred facilities: • For Marathon, the only public docking facility is Boot Key City Marina. • For Islamorada, the only public docking facility is Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina. • For Miami, based on prior Miami-Dade Studies and characteristics, the facility evaluated was the Dinner Key Marina in Coconut Grove. • Stock Island lacks a public facility, so two of the larger mixed-use marina resorts were selected for this initial analysis (Stock Island Village Marina and the Ocean Edge marina resort) Analysis Each of the four options were evaluated as stand-alone alternatives. The following criteria were used to compare/contrast each alternative: • Vessel o Type (Passenger or Auto) - Given the environmentally sensitive habitat and long distances (3 of the 4 options greater than 40 nm), a shallow draft, low wake, jet propelled Catamaran such as the Technicraft Designs' Ultra-low-wake catamaran was used to determine fuel consumption and draft of passenger vessels. For the purpose of the analysis and based on preliminary review of existing auto ferry designs, a draft of at least 10 feet was assumed for any auto ferries. o Size - Vessels were grouped into three size types based on hull length: Small (40-60 feet), medium (61-100 feet), or large (101-150 feet). o Speed —At least 1 nm of each route was kept a slow speed (5 knots) to reflect 0.5 nm of reduced speed going in and out of each terminal. Any segments of routes in the IWW were 147 given a maximum speed of 21.7 knots. Any remaining segments of open water outside the IWW were given a maximum speed of 40 knots. • Infrastructure Needs Multiple potential infrastructure needs including the access channel, slip/dock, terminal facilities, and last mile connectivity were evaluated for each route. Each element was categorized as suitable in the current configuration, upgrades required, or new elements required, to support a particular ferry. • Schedule - Trips Frequency (Hourly/Daily) and Number of Trips (per day) Trip frequency looks at the potential overall schedule for each option. Number of trips looks at the number of single trips that could be made in a day. Assumes operation only during light hours. These values will be used to determine some of the operational costs for each route. • Operational Costs" In 2011, the Federal Department of Transportation developed a model to be used by Federal Land Management Agencies to use to calculate the lifecycle costs of a ferry. Outdated content limited actual use of the model, but it did provide a framework to compare potential costs of each route. There are two principal types of costs associated with operating a ferry. Capital Costs and Operational/Maintenance costs. Capital costs includes purchase of a vessel and start-up costs (marketing, advertising, legal, permitting, licensing, etc.)16 Purchase prices for a passenger vessel can vary but new med to large ultra-low-wake catamarans seem to run between 5 to 9 million. Regardless of the route, start-up costs are going to be similar regardless of route. Operating costs include crew wages, fuel, lubricants, maintenance, hull insurance, indemnity/protection insurance, marketing, and overhear management. Annual Insurance rate typically run between 1 - 3% of the value of the vessel being insured." Maintenance is generally a function of the age of vessel and use. Like startup costs, advertisement and overhead management would be similar regardless of route. The remaining operating costs including wages and fuel seem to provide the best means to draw a cost comparison for each of the four routes analyzed. s Similar to the model, operation cost associated with the terminals or docks was not calculated due to the variability of conditions and locations. 16 Kay,Michael et. Al.Ferry Lifecycle Cost Model for Federal Land Management Agencies. John A.Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. Cambridge,MA.2011. "Kay,Michael et.Al.Ferry Lifecycle Cost Model for Federal Land Management Agencies. John A.Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. Cambridge,MA.2011,Page 3. 148 o Fuel- Diesel fuel prices were averaged from multiple boat fueling facilities in the Key West Area. The average cost was $3.71/Gallon. Rate of vessel fuel consumption (4nm/gallon) was based off the performance of the shallow draft/ultra-low wake vessels which are likely to be required for a passenger ferry within the Florida Keys Marine Sanctuary. o Wages- Wages were based off the Standard Occupational Classification 53-5021(Captains, Mates, and Pilots of Water Vessels) and 53-5011 (Sailors and Marine Oilers). The annual cost for one captain and two crew members were determined based on the 2020 mean hourly wage: Currently$43.14/hour for a captain and $ 26.77/hour for a Sailor(Crew). Analysis assumed 1 Captain and two crew per trip. Duration of work included transit time plus 15 minutes of any turn-around time. o Schedule— Where possible routes were started at daylight. For longer routes, start times were adjusted to maximize the number of possible trips per day. Key West served as the starting point and end point except for the Key West to Islamorada route which had a maximum of three trips as day. A summary of the findings is outlined in Table 8-20 and each alternative service scheme is detailed below. Table 8-20: Potential Ferry Service Schemes Route Vessel Infrastructure Needs Trips/Day Options Type Size Channel Slip/Dock Terminal Last Mile _Passenger Small Current , Current Upgrade Upgrade 16 Stock Island I Passenger Medium Passenger Large Current Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade 16 (8 nm) � g g Current pg de Upgrade Upgrade 16 Passenger Medium Current Current Upgrade New 4 Marathon - (44 nm) _Passenger Large Current Upgrade Upgrade New 4 Auto _Large Upgrade New Upgrade New - ,.m.m.m.m.m.m.m.m.m. m mmm m. mmm mm Passenger Medium Current Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade 4 Islamorada - .. .. .. (81 nm) , Passenger Large Current 1 New New Upgrade 4 Auto Large 1 Upgrade 1 New Upgrade Upgrade Miami Passenger Large Current Upgrade Upgrade Current 2 (134 nm) Auto Large Upgrade New New N/A............... ._ .. ._ .. 7.9.1 Option 1 - Stock Island to Key West Stock Island does not have a public marina. As a result, any ferry service would require some form of public/private partnership with a private marina/docking facility. Two of the most suitable locations would be at one of the mixed-used resort like Stock Island: Village Marina (Safe Harbor) or Oceans 149 Edge Marina (Safe Harbor Spur). Both facilities have a mixture of vacation lodging, restaurants (open to public), and large marinas. Vessel Type/Size Type Passenger Stock Island is approximately 8 nm from Key West. Potential ridership includes the Stock Island residents who commute to Key West for work, tourists staying at one of the resorts on Stock Island, and tourists on Key West who want to visit restaurants and other areas of interests (Shops, Art Galleries, Fisheries) on Stock Island. Auto Both Key West and Stock Island have deep waters capable of supporting an auto ferry. Auto ferries are typically used to either access an area that has no road connection (ex. Fisher Island in Miami) or provides an alternate route that is substantially shorter than taking the existing road (ex. Mayport Ferry in Jacksonville Florida). An auto ferry could also serve to remove vehicles a particular corridor. However, given the short distance between Stock Island and Key West coupled with the desire to reduce the vehicle traffic on Key West, an auto ferry is not considered practical and was therefore not evaluated further. Size The short distance between Stock Island and Key West makes the use of a smaller vessel feasible. However, the ride may still be rough for passengers and any expansion in services/stops could be restricted. Medium sized ferries (60-100 feet) are faster, more stable, and can support larger passenger numbers while still having shallow drafts, low wakes, and maneuverability to navigate to/from a variety of docking facilities. Stock Island and Key West could support a large passenger ferry (> 100 feet). However, given the short distance from Stock Island to Key West and smaller population, a larger ferry would likely exceed ridership demand. If, however the county plans to add potential future expansion to inter-island routes (example Stock island to Marathon), it may make sense acquire a vessel with passenger capacity capable of supporting future growth/trip distance. 150 Infrastructure Needs Channel Water depths in Safe Harbor's entrance channel are a minimum of 18-feet deep. Depths in Safe Harbor Spur's entrance channel are minimum of 17-feet deep. Even the largest ferry vessels including auto ferries would be able to access either harbor under current conditions. Slip/Dock The larger docking facilities in both harbors have a minimum depth of at least 10 feet and can accommodate vessels lengths greater than 100 feet. Terminal Both Stock Island Village Marina and Oceans Edge Marina were recently updated/renovated. For smaller "shuttle" or "taxi" type vessels, landside improvements to either location would be relatively minor and more focused on safety and compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Larger vessel could potentially require additional boarding equipment and landside improvements (ex. sheltered waiting area) and additional minor in water structures (ex. dolphin piles). Last Mile Connectivity While there are multiple public bus stops less than a mile from each facility, they have no shelters or services and are a bit of a walk (possible ADA compliance issues). A new stop with shelter or a relocated or improved existing stop would be required at the designated facility to ensure that last mile connectivity. Schedule Buses for the Key West Transit's South Line run every 1.3 hours. Ideally the ferry schedule should be in sync with the landside transportation schedule. If passenger numbers for the ferry differ from the existing bus schedule, there may be a need to either provide additional bus times or add multiple ferry vessels to provide to ensure full integration/synchronization. A ferry traveling 21.7 knots starting at 6:15 AM from Key West and ending at Key West at 6:45 PM could make 16, 30-minute trips back and forth from Stock Island with 15-minute stop/turnaround time. This would sync with the existing bus schedule. Given both the number of workers commuting from Stock Island and the large tourism industry the ferry would operate 7-days a week/365 day per year. Operating Costs Total annual operating costs (Wages/Fuel) _ $ 43,333 + $414,637 = $457,970 151 Fuel Assuming 16 trips a day, starting in Key West at 6:15 AM and ending in Key West at 6:15 PM total operation time is 11.75 hours [(16 x 0.5 hour) + (15 x 0.25 hour)]. Total daily distance traveled is 128 nm [8 nm x 16]. With a 4 nautical mile per gallon (gal) fuel consumption, 32 gal would be consumed per day or 11,680 gal per year. At$3.71 per gal, basic fuel cost would be approximately$43,333/year. Wages Captains with a wage of $43.14/hour would earn $506.90 [11.75 x $43.14] daily or $185,017/year. Sailors (crew) with a wage of $26.77/hour would earn $314.55 [11.75 x $26.77]) daily or $114,810/year. Total wages for one captain and two crew for the year would be $414,637 [(2 x $114,810) + $185,017] /year. 7.9.2 Option 2 - Marathon to Key West Boot Key City Marina is a public marina owned and managed by the city of Marathon. It can currently only accommodate vessels up to 60 ft. It is located approximately 44 nm (50 mi) from Key West on the eastern end of Boot Key Harbor. Marathons' 2005 Comprehensive Plan recommended development of the existing Boot Key Harbor City Marina as a potential intermodal connection between surface transportation and regional water transportation. Vessel Type/Size Type Passenger- The distance between Marathon and Key West is approximately 44 nm by water from Boot Key City Harbor Marina. Shallow waters in Boot Key Harbor along with several tight turns may limit the size of a passenger vessel. Auto - Auto ferries draw significantly more water than passenger vessels and would therefore be unlikely to have sufficient depth/channel width to safety navigate to Key Harbor City Marina. Therefore, this alternative was not evaluated. Size Small - The time it would take a small vessel to make a single trip coupled with potential complications/safety/passenger comfort issues associated with operating a small vessel in open ocean makes a small ferry impracticable for this route. 152 Medium - Medium (60-100 feet) vessels are faster, more stable, and can support larger passenger numbers while still having shallow drafts, low wakes, and maneuverability to navigate to/from a variety of docking facilities. Large - Given the longer distance, a larger capacity vessel may be necessary to compensate for the longer transit times. A more detailed assessment including hydrographic surveys and modeling would need to be done to determine whether the larger ferry vessels (>100 ft) could safely navigate through boot key harbor into the city marina. If the county plans to add potential future expansion to inter-island routes (example Key West to Marathon to Islamorada), it may make sense acquire a vessel with passenger capacity capable of supporting future growth/trip distance. Infrastructure Needs Channel Boot Key Harbor's entrance channel is congressionally authorized and federally maintained waterway with a control depth of 12 feet. However, the channel is not frequently maintained and the segment the between the authorized channel and the Boot Key City Marina is no deeper than 7-feet. A portion of the designated channel makes a sharp turn that could limit the length of vessels. Additionally, the channel may require a new or maintenance dredging event to ensure adequate depths for the larger vessels and new dredging to expand the turn. However, new dredging is prohibited under state regulations (18-21.0041, FAC). Slip/Dock Water depths in Boot Key Harbor Marina are a minimum of 10 feet and they can currently accommodate vessels up to 60 feet. The condition of existing docking facilities at Boot Key City Harbor would require repair/refurbishment to accommodate even a small vessel. In order to accommodate a medium (61-100 foot) or large (>101), new docks and changes in dock configuration to ensure space for navigation would be required. Terminal Boot Key City Marina will require new landside facilities and docks to support repeat use vessels and passengers. Last Mile Connectivity Two Lower Keys Shuttle stops are within "Last Mile" of Boot Key City Harbor (36th Street and 33rd Street near FHP). However currently, they have no shelters or services and are a bit of a walk(possible ADA compliance issues). The last stop of the Route 301 (Dade-Monroe Express) is a little over a mile 153 east at Mile Marker 50 on US 1 in Marathon. There is also a full-service Greyhound Bus Station located at 9400 Overseas Hwy. Marathon, FL 33050. A new stop with shelter at the existing LKS stop and addition of an additional Dade-Monroe Express stop would enhance the overall connectivity of the marina. Alternatively, investment in a shuttle between Marathon Airport and the marina could connect the marina directly to all the ground/air transportation in the area. Schedule Ideally, the ferry schedule should be in sync with the landside transportation schedule. For Boot Key Harbor that would be Key West Transit's Lower Keys Shuttle (Sheltered stop on U.S. 1 adjacent to the marina facility) which runs every 2 hours. However, given the distance between Marathon and Key West it would require two vessels to maintain that schedule. It takes a little over an hour to drive from Marathon to Key West (50 miles). In order for a passenger ferry to deliver a comparable transit time, the vessel would need to be able to travel approximately 43 knots. This does not take include required speed restrictions in Boot Key Harbor or Key West Harbor. Given the all the route falls within either the standard slow zone or IWW, time to take one trip would be 2 hours [1 nm at 5 knots (0.2 hours) and 43 nm at 21.7 knots (1.98 hours)]. A ferry starting at 8:00 AM in Key West and ending at Key West at 4:45 PM could make approximately 4, 2-hour trips back and forth from Marathon with 15-minute stop/turnaround time. Given the large tourism industry this analysis assumes the ferry would operate 7-days a week/365 day per year. Operating Costs Total operating costs (Wages/Fuel) = $59,583 + $308,772= $368,355 Fuel Assuming 4 trips a day, starting in Key West at 8:00 AM and ending in Key West at 4:54 PM total operation time is 8.75 hours [(4 x 2 hours) + (3 x 0.25 hour)]. Total daily distance traveled is 176 nm (44 nm x 4). With a 4 nautical mile per gallon (gal) fuel consumption, 44 gal would be consumed per day or 16,060 gal per year. At $3.71 per gal, basic fuel cost would be approximately $ 59,583/year. Wages Captains with a wage of $43.14/hour would earn $377.47 (8.75 x $43.14) daily or $137,778/year. Sailors (crew) with a wage of$26.77/hour would earn $234.24 (8.75 x $26.77) daily or$85,497/year. Total wages for one captain and two crew for the year would be $ 308,772 [(2 x$85,497) + $137,778)] / year. 154 7.9.3 Option 3 — Islamorada to Key West Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina is a public marina owned and managed by the village of Islamorada. It is located adjacent to the Founders Park on the Florida Bay side of Plantation Key. The marina is located more than 81 nm (90 mi) from Key West. Vessel Type/Size Type Passenger- Water depths at Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina are a minimum of 5-feet deep and they can currently accommodate vessels up to 80 feet. Auto - Auto ferries draw significantly more water than passenger vessels and would therefore be unlikely to have sufficient depth/channel width to safety navigate to Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina. Therefore, this alternative was not evaluated. Size Small - Similar to Marathon, the time it would take a small vessel to make a single trip coupled with potential complications/safety/passenger comfort issues associated with operating a small vessel in open ocean makes a small ferry impracticable for this route. Medium - Medium (60-100 feet) vessels are faster, more stable, and can support larger passenger numbers while still having shallow drafts, low wakes, and maneuverability to navigate to/from a variety of docking facilities. Large—Like Marathon, a larger capacity vessel may be necessary to compensate for the longer transit times. A more detailed assessment including hydrographic surveys and modeling may need to be done to determine whether the larger ferry vessels (>100 ft) could safely navigate into Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina. Currently the marina can only support a vessel up to 80 feet. If the county plans to add potential future expansion to inter-island routes (example Key West to Islamorada to Key Largo), it may make sense acquire a vessel with passenger capacity capable of supporting future growth/trip distance. 155 Infrastructure Needs Channel Water depths between the IWW and Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina range from 5' to 7'. The closet cut from the Atlantic to Bay side of Plantation Key is Snake Creek which has a minimum depth of 7'. Minimum clearance under U.S. 1 is 27 feet, however the bridge is a drawbridge allowing taller vessels to pass. Dock/Slip Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina, the deepest of the Marina's on Islamorada, has a minimum control depth of only 5 feet and can currently accommodate vessels up to 80 feet. which may limit access for a larger passenger ferry (>100 ft). For a medium size ferry, existing docking facilities at Plantation Yacht Harbor Marina would likely require some minor landside improvements to include boarding equipment, safety improvements and changes necessary for compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). For a large vessel, new docking facilities would be required. Terminal Needs Increases in the passenger's capacity may correlate to a need to add/improve landside facilities to support repeat use vessels and passengers. Last Mile Connectivity There is an unsheltered Miami-Dade Transit Route 301 bus stop adjacent to the Islamorada Visitor Center that is within walking distance (< .4 mile) of the marina facility. A new shelter at the existing would enhance the overall connectivity of the marina. The village of Islamorada runs an intra-island free ride-share with Freebee (electronic transportation). There is also a Greyhound bus stop in a Burger King Parking Lot at 82201 Overseas Hwy, Islamorada, FL 33036. Moving the Greyhound bus stop to an improved Miami-Dade stop would enhance the overall connectivity of the land transportation resources to the marina. Schedule At a minimum, the ferry schedule should be in sync with the landside transportation schedule. Buses for the Miami Dade County Transit Route 301 runs 7 days a week. Time between buses varies from 30 minutes to 1.5 hours depending on the time of day. Given the distance between Islamorada and Key West a fleet of vessels would be required to maintain the bus schedule. 156 According to Google Maps, it can take between 1.75 — 2.25 hours by car depending on hour/time of day for cars to travel (87 miles) from upper Islamorada to Key West. A vessel would have to travel approximately 40 knots to travel 81 nm in 2 hours by water. This does not take include required speed restrictions in Plantation Yacht Harbor, Key West Harbor, or the Intracoastal Waterway. Approximately 40 nm of the 81 nm route has unlimited speed restrictions while the remainder is 21.7 nm or less. A ferry traveling 1 nm at 5 knots, 41 nm at 40 knots and 39 nm at 21.7 knots starting at 7:00 AM in Key West and ending at Islamorada at 6:00 PM could make approximately 3, 3-hour trips with a 1 hour stop/turnaround time. Given the large tourism industry this analysis assumes the ferry would operate 7-days a week/365 day per year. Operating Costs Total operating costs (Wages/Fuel) _ $109,686 + $335,238= $444,924 Fuel Assuming 3 trips a day, starting in Key West at 7:00 AM and ending in Islamorada at 5:00 PM total operation time is 9.5 hours [(3 x 3) + (2 x 0.25)]. Total daily distance traveled is 324 nm (81 nm x 4). With a 4 nautical mile per gallon (gal)fuel consumption, 81 gal would be consumed per day or 29,565 gal per year. At $3.71 per gal, basic fuel cost would be approximately $109,686/year. Wages Captains with a wage of$43.14/hour would earn $409.83 [9.5 x$43.14] daily or$149,588/year. Sailors (crew) with a wage of $26.77/hour would earn $254.31 [9.5 x $26.77] daily or $92,825/year. Total wages for one captain and two crew for the year would be $335,238 [(2 x$92,825) + $149,588] /year 7.9.4 Option 4 — Miami to Key West For the purpose of this report, evaluation of Miami terminus was limited to a single facility: the city of Miami's Dinner Key Marina located in Coconut Grove. Passengers flying into any of the three major South Florida airports (Miami International, Florida Lauderdale-Hollywood International, and Palm Beach International) can travel directly to Dinner Key via Tri-rail/Metrorail and their connecting shuttle services avoiding U.S. 1 altogether. Miami-Dade water transportation studies have repeatedly identified Dinner Key as a potential ferry terminal. It is also the location for the next proposed Miami Poseidon Ferry Route making it an ideal water transportation connector to both downtown Miami and Miami Beach. Dinner Key would provide direct 157 Vessel Type/Size Type Passenger-Water depths at Dinner Key Marina are a minimum of 7-feet deep and they can currently accommodate vessels up to 110 feet. It has several areas along the existing bulkhead that could likely support a larger vessel including a repeat trip ferry. Auto-This facility may also be able to accommodate a passenger/auto ferry. An auto ferry could also serve to remove vehicles from U.S. 1. However additional research would be required to determine the capacity of a passenger/auto ferry including channel suitability given auto ferries draft is deeper than a traditional passenger ferry and coordination with the local community regarding potential effects on local traffic. However, given the desire to reduce the vehicle traffic on Key West, an auto ferry is not considered practical and was therefore not evaluated further. Size Small- Dinner Key is approximately 134 nm from Key West. The time it would take a small vessel to make a single trip coupled with potential complications/safety/passenger comfort issues associated with operating a small vessel in open ocean makes a small ferry impracticable for this route. Medium - Medium (60-100 feet) vessels are faster, more stable, and can support larger passenger numbers while still having shallow drafts, low wakes, and maneuverability to navigate to/from a variety of docking facilities. However, a medium vessel may not be able to carry the number of passengers necessary to make longer less frequent trips then the other route options. Large- Dinner Key already has capacity to accommodate a large vessel. Given the number of trips is just two per day, a larger capacity vessel capable of carrying more passengers would be required. Infrastructure Needs Channel Dinner Key Channel runs northwest from central Biscayne Bay into Dinner Key Marina. Depth at the channel entrance is 8 feet with a 7-foot minimum in the yacht basin. Dock/Slip Water depths at Dinner Key Marina are a minimum of 7-feet deep and they can currently accommodate vessels up to 110 feet. 158 Terminal For a medium sized ferry, existing docking facilities at Dinner Key would not require additional changes. The county is already planning expansion of the medium size Poseidon ferry to Dinner Key which would include dock and landside features capable of accommodating a medium passenger vessel. Larger ferries may require additional landside facilities capable of supporting larger capacity, repeat use vessels and passengers. Last Mile Connectivity Dinner Key Marina has direct public transportation connections including a free shuttle to the nearby Metrorail station which connects directly to Miami International Airport as well as to both Florida- Hollywood International Airport and Palm Beach International Airport via Tri-Rail. Adjacent bus stops are sheltered and connect to both Miami-Dade County and City of Miami bus/trolly. Miami City Hall is located within the marina property and there are many hotels/restaurants within walking distance. Schedule For these larger capacity vessels less frequent services (1 or 2 times a day) appear are more practicable. The services should be synced as much as possible with the other proposed ferry and the existing transportation system. Shuttles to Metrorail and the local city trolly run every 15 minutes. According to Google Maps, the trip from Miami International Airport to Key West is can take between 3.25—4.25 hours by car depending on hour/time of day.A vessel would need to be capable of traveling between 32 - 42 knots per hour to travel the same distance by water. This does not take include required speed restrictions in Biscayne Bay, Key West Harbor, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway which runs in Hawks Channel between Marathon to Key West. 91 nm of the 134 nm route has no speed limit. The remainder is 21.7 knots of less. A ferry traveling 1 nm at 5 knots, 42 nm at 21.7 knots and 90 nm at 40 knots starting at 6 AM in Key West and ending at Key West at 6:PM could make approximately 2, 4.5-hour trips back and forth from Dinner Key with a 3 hour stop/turnaround time. Given the large tourism industry this analysis assumes the ferry would operate 7-days a week/365 day per year." "Note there may be benefit in starting out with weekly services to gage interest/demand while minimizing operational costs. Services should sync with the days/times with the largest congestion which appear to be Friday through Sunday. 159 Operating Costs Total operating costs (Wages/Fuel) _ $90,728 + $416,403= $507,131 Fuel Assuming 2 trips a day, starting in Key West at 6:00 AM and ending in Key West at 6:00 PM total operation time is 11.8 hours [(2 x 4.4 hours) + (1 x 3 hours)]. Total daily distance traveled is 268 nm (134 nm x 2). With a 4 nautical mile per gallon (gal) fuel consumption, 67 gal would be consumed per day or 24,455 gal per year. At $3.71 per gal, basic fuel cost would be approximately $ 90,728/year. Wages Captains with a wage of $43.14/hour would earn $509.05 [11.8 x $43.14] daily or $185,803/year. Sailors (crew)with a wage of$26.77/hour would earn $315.89 [11.8 x$26.77] daily or$115,300/year. Total wages for one captain and two crew for the year would be $416,403 [(2 x$115,300) + $185,8031 / year. 7.10 Findings The information identified in the route analysis was used to identify screening criteria to select the preferred route option(s). The criteria are as follows: • Relative Hardship Initiating (Logistical and Vessel/Service Provider Procurement) • Likely Ridership Demand • Ridership Pool Size • Impact on US 1 (corridorwide trips and/or local trips) • Public Funding Likelihood Each option was assessed and ranked in terms of suitability. The results are summarized in Table 8-21. Table 8-21: Summary of Route Analysis Findings Criteria Stock Marathon' Islamorada' Miami' Island' Relative Hardship Initiating High High Medium Low (Logistical) Low (PP) Relative Hardship Initiating High (Vessel/Service Provider Medium High High Low (PP) Procurement) Likely Ridership Demand High Medium Low High 160 Criteria Stock Marathon Islamorada2 Miami3 Island' Ridership Pool Size Low Medium Medium High Impact on US 1 Corridorwide trips Low Medium Medium High Impact on Local US 1 trips High Medium Medium Low Public Funding Likelihood Medium Medium Medium High Annual Operating Costs $457,970 $368,355 $444,924 $507,131 (Fuel/Crew Wages) Terms: PP-Private Partnership Notes: 1. Assumes Small Taxi/Shuttle Passenger Vessel (40-60'long) 2. Assumes Medium Passenger Vessel (61-100'long) 3. Assumes Large Passenger Vessel(101'Plus Long) Both the Marathon and Islamorada route options have a large degree of uncertainty regarding existing conditions/limitations/demands that make practicability/suitability for development unanswered. Both routes are in excess of 50 miles, making the use of large ferries (faster/larger passenger capacity) to transport a similar number of people in a similar time period as auto travel necessary. They both also have some depth/channel configuration challenges that make detailed surveying/modeling necessary to confirm a larger ferry can navigate to and from the public marina facilities. Considering the level of uncertainty and complexity, the Key West-Marathon or the Key West-Islamorada routes do not appear to be the best options for initial water transportation deployment. Based on the high-level review, both the Miami-Key West and Stock Island-Key West routes appear to be more feasible. Each of these two routes are evaluated below. 7.10.1 Evaluation of Miami and Stock Island Services Initial Considerations Miami Miami's Dinner Key Marina would require the least investment and upgrading to support a passenger ferry service, even involving a large vessel. The biggest initial investment would be procurement of a vessel. The simplest way to accomplish this would be to work with an existing ferry service (example Key West Express or Dry Tortugas Yankee Ferry)to expand their service to/from Miami. Alternatively, a new service could be established for this route. Stock Island Stock Island would require little to no investment for accommodating a small vessel/shuttle passenger service. The primary limitation is obtaining an agreement with an existing private docking facility for 161 the use of dock/slip and landside terminal facilities. Without that partnership, a new marina on the existing waterways would be required. The hardship in acquiring land, permitting, etc. would be very high. If a public/private partnership is secured, then the next logical steps include procuring a ferry vessel and operators. This could occur through purchase of a used vessel or possible request for a public grant under one of the programs previously discussed. Likely Ridership Demand/Ridership Pool Size Miami As discussed in previous sections, a service from Miami's Coconut Grove Neighborhood would likely generate a high level of demand and has the largest potential ridership pool size. Stock Island Stock Island will have lower ridership numbers, but local demand could be high due to diversity of potential riders and economic connectivity between two communities. Success will depend on more frequent service and coordination with existing local transportation providers and business. Impact on Roadway Traffic Reduction Miami The Miami to Key West route has the largest potential to divert the greatest number of passenger vehicles from US 1. If successful, diverting visitors to/from Key West (or Key West residents to/from Miami) could reduce the number of vehicles on US 1 in the Florida Keys. It could also provide some small (<%5) reduction of traffic on US 1 in Miami-Dade County between 1-95 and Kendall Drive). Stock Island The interconnected relationship between Stock Island and Key West along with the short transit time may make this a good area to initiate a shuttle/taxi ferry service. Also, it will help improve the level of service on the segment of US 1 between Stock Island and Key West as well as decrease the number of cars and traffic on Key West. This service could be part of a broader regional system that in conjunction with other services could contribute to the overall improvement of the corridor. Public Funding Miami The Miami to Key West route has the largest potential to qualify as a designated corridor in MARADs Marine Highway Program. As detailed in Chapter 4, a marine corridor is, "A water transportation route that serves as an extension of the surface transportation system that can help mitigate congestion-related impacts along a specified land transportation route. It is identified and 162 described in terms of the land transportation route that it supplements, and must, by transporting freight or passengers, provide measurable benefits to the surface transportation route in the form of traffic reductions, reduced emissions, energy savings, improved safety, system resiliency, and/or reduced infrastructure costs." This route may also qualify for additional grants for purchase of vessels, landside upgrades, and even federal dollars to improve aids to navigation or more frequent hydrographic surveying. Stock Island Given the smaller passenger pool, public funding for this route would generally require connectivity with existing land-based transportation like the Key West Transit System. Additional possible grants could include the purchase of ferry vessels or landside improvements for ferries (See Chapter 5: Federal Transit Administration (FTA)). 163 7.11 Conclusions Of the five routes considered, only two appear to have sufficient existing information to support moving forward with potential initiation of a service. Note that neither route type is mutually exclusive. The County could start with a shorter local shuttle/taxi ferry from Stock Island to Key West and expand to a long-distance ferry from Miami to Key West. Miami to Key West Based on the criteria previously mentioned, the Key West to Miami (Coconut Grove) Service is recommended for further evaluation. The recommended service and potential opportunities/constraints is summarized in Table 8-22. Table 8-22: Miami to Key West-Result Summary Vessel Size Large Frequency of Weekly (potentially on weekends to address traffic congestion) Service Schedule Depart Miami to Key West— Friday (AM) Return Key West to Miami — Sunday (Noon) Comparable to Key West Express/Dry Tortugas Ferry ($100 to $150 Fare Round Trip) Possible Marine Highway Designation and State/Federal Funding Large Passenger Pool and high value destination on both ends of service Detailed planning studies already completed on Miami end. Largest potential passenger vehicle reduction on US 1 Opportunities Strong connectivity to local, regional, and interstate transportation Could generate information to determine suitability of future services/locations Potential shorter transit time (< 4 hours) Possible License for Biscayne National Park Requires City/County Authorization for Vessel in Dinner Key Potential Resource Agency Coordination FWS Manatee (Dinner Key) Constraints FKNMS for service through Sanctuary Agreement from City of Miami to participate Vessel Procurement Navigation Hazards DOD protected Areas Stock Island to Key West The establishment of this type of Small Shuttle/Taxi ferry service rather than a large passenger ferry is distinct enough to be developed concurrently with the Miami Route. This would allow some testing 164 of suitability for shorter shuttle routes (which may have benefit in other areas like Marathon and Islamorada) while providing the type of larger scale project that may be needed to obtain federal funding and resources. The recommended service and potential opportunities/constraints are summarized in Table 8-23. Table 8-23: Stock Island to Key West— Result Summary Vessel Size Small Frequency of Every 1.3 hours (Sync with existing City Route Bus Line) Service Schedule 7 Days a week (Sync with existing City Route Bus Line) Fare Free up to cost of bus ticket. (example $2 one-way to $15/Month resident) Existing Last Mile Connectivity Existing Deep-Water channels Opportunities Multiple large marinas in Key West Commercial Fishing Fleet could create tourist destination No public facility in Stock Island; Requires partnerships with private entities Potential Resource Agency Coordination FKNMS for service through Sanctuary Constraints Current Bus stop has no shelter/services Could create conflict with commercial fisherman (Need for outreach and Input) Vessel Procurement 7.12 Next Steps 7.12.1 Complete a Comprehensive Plan/Study This report only took a high-level look at five passenger ferry routes to/from Key West. There may be other complementary services that individually/collectively could contribute to reductions in congestion on US 1 (example ferry shuttle service around Islamorada). Any future action will require a more comprehensive evaluation of all possible service routes and more detailed evaluations, which could include any/all of the following: • Hydrographic/benthic lidar survey of all existing waterways, • Site assessment of docking facilities, • Ridership surveys • Biological assessments • Economic analysis • Stakeholder coordination 165 • Permitting/licensing • Phasing 7.12.2 Investigate Funding Resources Regardless of which service the county choses to pursue, investigation of potential requirements and opportunities for various public funding resources should be conducted as early as possible. A preliminary list of resources that should be considered is provided in this report. Note any additional planning studies should ensure they address information that will be required as part of a grant request application (ex. economic study/environmental assessment). Note that some of the application process like the Marine Highway Program could serve as the project study. Acceptance of a corridor into the Marine Highway Program could allow for the Federal Transportation Agencies to act as the project proponent taking the lead on any required coordination/permitting associated with proposed projects. 7.12.3 Development of Risk Register The large number of variables and risks associated with any development in the Florida Keys supports the development of a risk register for any routes that come out of a more comprehensive planning study. The risk register will allow for identification and mitigation of any risks (environmental/design/construction/cost/schedule) early in the process when they can be mitigated. 7.12.4 Consider Navigation Improvements Aid to Navigation Upgrading or installing additional Aids to Navigation may help ensure all boaters including any ferry's stay in the designated channel. This may also be an opportunity to reach out to stakeholders like the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) and Biscayne Bay National Park to better identify areas with repeated incidents of damage and possibly improve navigational aids for all boaters to avoid the same mistakes. This engagement may also help alleviate FKNMS and NPS concerns about repeat trip vessels in the sanctuary which could help streamline any permit authorizations for land based improvements or obtain a commercial lease to run a ferry through Key Biscayne National Park (Required for both the Hawk Channel and IWW routes). Increased Hydrographic Surveys Currently, USACE regularly conducts hydrographic surveys of the Main Ship Channel in Key West. Increased frequency and coverage of those surveys including any channel with a planned ferry route 166 could help improve navigation safety and reduce the risk of collision with protected resources. Funding for those surveys is ultimately made through annual congressional appropriations which is another reason obtaining a marine highway corridor designation could improve the level of resources available to better maintain and monitor the corridor. For the portions of waters within the Intracoastal Waterway, the Florida Inland Navigation District may also be able to help secure funding and resources for surveys and channel maintenance in any portion within Miami-Dade County. 167 9 Innovative Improvements The purpose of this section is to introduce transportation technology trends and transportation systems management and operations (TSM&O) strategies, then recommend what initiatives should be advanced for further study as possible components of the US 1 Transportation Master Plan (TMP). 7.13 Emerging Transportation Trends Technological trends are beginning to reshape our multimodal transportation systems and influence a change in travel behavior. These trends have the potential to be integrated into our transportation infrastructure and systems in alignment with Florida DOT's "Vital Few" goals - improving safety, enhancing mobility, inspiring innovation, and attracting, retaining, and training top talent to proactively manage the transportation system. Figure 9-1 presents an overview of some of the more common transportation technology trends. Shared Mobility on Connected Automated Electric Public Other Disruptive Mobility Demand(MOD) Vehicles(CAV) Vehicles(EV) Transportation Technologies Ridesourcing Multimodal Connected EV Charging High — Urban Air Trip Planning Vehicles Stations Speed Rail Mobility(eVTOL) Carsharing Mobility Automated Smart Hyperloop Personal Microtransit as a Service Vehicles Powered Lanes Delivery Services Automated Bikesharing L Cooperative Automated Guideway Transit Unmanned Transportation Aerial Vehicle Active Transportation Personal Rapid Boring Transit Tunnel System Scooter-sharing Y Courier Network Automated Bus Services Aerial Gondola Water Taxi Figure 9-1: Emerging Transportation Trends A brief description of each transportation technology trend is summarized in Table 9-1. While it is recognized that many of these trends may not be applicable to the transportation needs of Monroe County, they are presented here to cast the net wide open in selecting strategies which may be considered in developing long-range solutions as part of the US 1 TMP. 168 Table 9-1: Transportation Technology Trends Shared Mobility) Ridesourcing, or Transportation Network Company(TNC), services ii use smartphone apps to bring passengers in contact with drivers who typically drive part-time and use their own car (e.g., Uber, Lyft). u it "Surge pricing" attempts to balance supply and demand at various times and destinations. Carsharing is a model of car rental where people rent cars for short periods of time, often by the hour or day(e.g., Zipcar, Turo). It differs from traditional car rental in that owners of the cars are often private individuals themselves, and the carsharing facilitator is generally p distinct from the car owner. Carsharing is part of a larger trend of : shared mobility. s Microtransit is a form of demand responsive transport. This transit service offers a highly flexible routing and/or highly flexible k i scheduling of minibus vehicles shared with other passengers. Microtransit providers build routes ad-hoc exclusively to match each "sett demand and supply and extend the efficiency and accessibility of the t` transit service. Possible pick-up/drop-off stops are restricted, and transit can be provided either as a stop-to-stop service or curbside service. Nationwide, at least 24 transit agencies are expected to initiate micro transit contracts this year. Bikesharing is a shared transport service in which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short-term basis for a price or free. Many bike share systems allow people to borrow a bike from a "dock" and return it at another dock belonging to the same system. Docks are special bike racks that lock the bike, and only release it by computer control. The user enters payment information, and the computer unlocks a bike. The user returns the bike by placing U,r,� " � � it in the dock. Many bikesharing services currently exist in Florida and other places. ti Active Transportation is the transport of people or goods, through non-motorized means, based around human physical activity. The 1, best-known forms of active mobility are walking and cycling, though other modes include running, rowing, skateboarding, scooters and ' roller skates. Due to its prevalence, cycling is sometimes considered separately from the other forms of active mobility. Scooter-sharing is a shared transport service in which electric Mai _ motorized scooters (e-scooters) are made available to use for short- W, M term rentals. E-scooters are typically "dockless", meaning that they do not have a fixed home location and are dropped off and picked up from certain locations in the service area. Many scooter-sharing services currently exist in Florida and other places. 169 m Courier network services is a form of delivery service that uses ;.r online applications or platforms to facilitate the delivery of freight. This can either be through a company, or through an individual delivering something (for example if the destination is on their route). Mobility on Demand (MOD) «, Mobility on Demand (MOD) combines traditional public transportation with private enterprise options into a single mobility service. MOD is traveler-focused, putting more weight on personal choice, trip satisfaction and the efficient delivery of services. Combining all these mobility services fills gaps in the current transportation offerings to allow true, complete point-to-point trips for everyone. A MOD digital platform helps travelers plan their journey and packages the various mode options, allowing them to choose whatever is most efficient for them — be it shortest travel time, lowest Jl cost, fewest transfers, or limited walking. t fir£ Mobility as a Service is a type of service that through a joint digital channel enables users to plan, book, and pay for multiple types of mobility services. This is enabled by combining transportation services from public and private transportation providers through a unified gateway that creates and manages the trip, which users can pay for with a single account. Users can pay per trip or a monthly fee I for a limited distance. It is quickly becoming a reality in Europe. Connected Automated Vehicles (CAV) i Connected Vehicles (CV) is a program where the USDOT is working with state and local transportation agencies, vehicle and A device makers, and the public to test and evaluate technology that ` will enable cars, buses, trucks, trains, roads and other infrastructure, and smartphones and other devices to communicate with one another. Drivers would receive notifications and alerts of dangerous situations. The US 1 Keys COAST project has recently been let for construction. The project covers 112.5 miles from Key West to Key Largo and addresses traffic signalization, transit service, freight movement, pedestrian and cyclist safety, drawbridge management, emergency vehicle preemption, and real-time data exchange. Automated Vehicles (AV) are capable of sensing the environment and moving safely with little or no human input. Various sensor types , z are used to identify and track the position and movement of nearby objects that may pose a collision risk to the vehicle, such as other " - vehicles and pedestrians. Additionally, cameras are used to detect �4' the phase of traffic signals and the presence of signs (e.g., stop or yield signs). The FDOT SunTrax facility is a 2.25-mile-long oval test track, the only high-speed AV testing facility in the southeastern �. " United States. Meanwhile, other AV pilot programs are being tested in real-world environments such as the CAPRI program in London. 170 ` Cooperative Automated Transportation (CAT) is a transportation system that is comprised of devices, including vehicles, that are cooperative in nature, and contain some level of automation. This automation need not exist within the vehicles but could for example include automated traffic signal re-timing. Boring Tunnel System, developed by Elon Musk, is a high-speed underground system in which passengers are transported via compatible automated electric vehicles at up to 155 miles per hour. d 4 The Las Vegas Convention Center Loop was recently built and tested. This system includes three stops with above ground stations at either end while the one in the middle is at the same 30-foot depth as the tunnels. A few dozen Tesla vehicles were used during the testing. Electric Vehicles (EV)± Electric Vehicle Charging Stations supply electric energy to charge plug-in electric vehicles including cars, neighborhood electric vehicles, trucks, buses and others. The Florida DOT will be developing a plan to add more electric vehicle charging stations along the state's highway system. 1 Smart Powered Lanes use dynamic wireless power transfer technology to charge electric vehicles as they travel along the roadway through a series of charging coils installed in the pavement. Pilot programs to demonstrate this technology applications are being considered in some states (e.g., Colorado, Illinois). Public Transportation High Speed Rail (HSR) is a type of rail transport that runs significantly faster than traditional rail, using an integrated system of specialized rolling stock and dedicated tracks. While there is no single standard that applies worldwide, new lines in excess of 160 mph and existing lines in excess of 120 mph, are widely considered to be high-speed. Existing HSR systems are operational in Europe, China, and Japan but are only in the planning phases in the US. Hyperloop is a proposed super speed transportation system in which people and freight would be able to travel in a hovering pod inside a vacuum tube. The Hyperloop could potentially convey people or objects at airline or hypersonic speeds (e.g., 760 mph) while being energy efficient compared with high-speed rail systems. 4 While there are 11 hyperloop systems proposed in the US, none are operational. Automated Guideway Transit(AGT) is a fully automated, driverless �- „,�;� transit system in which vehicles typically travel at speeds of 10 to 15 �u�aaAeu� �`a s iZz mph along a dedicated guideway. The vehicles are often rubber tired or steel wheeled, but other systems including air cushion and maglev systems have also been used in experiments. The Miami Metromover was the first application of an AGT system in a US city. 171 Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) are automated low speed vehicles RON - that provide on-demand nonstop travel on tracks within dedicated guideways, typically with off-line stations. Each vehicle carries two to 10 people, providing a level of privacy and security not found with traditional mass transit. They typically operate within controlled environments such as airports (Heathrow), amusement parks (Disneyworld), and college campuses (e.g., West Virginia University). Automated Buses are larger automated vehicles that travel at posted roadway speeds, including highway speeds. This technology may help transit operators reduce accidents and insurance costs. It can also be designed to share information including route conditions and road hazards with other buses in the network to optimize efficiency. Automated buses have been pilot tested in Minneapolis, Las Vegas, and other cities throughout the world. The Automated Bus Consortium was formed in 2019 to combine the purchasing ' k " power of many transit agencies to invest in highly automated buses. Aerial Gondolas is a means of cable transport and type of aerial lift which is supported and propelled by cables from above. It consists of a loop of steel wire rope that is strung between two stations, sometimes over intermediate supporting towers. They are often considered continuous systems as they feature a haul rope which continuously moves and circulates around two terminal stations. The Mississippi Aerial River Transit, or simply MART, was a gondola lift transport system spanning the Mississippi River in New Orleans. Water Taxis are watercrafts used to provide public or private transport, typically in an urban environment. Service may be scheduled with multiple stops, operating in a similar manner to a bus, or on demand to many locations, operating in a similar manner to a taxi. Next generation water taxis may be electric and automated. xa Water taxis currently operate in Fort Lauderdale and other cities. Other Disruptive Technologies Air Taxis, or Electronic Vertical Take Off and Landing (eVTOL), are small commercial aircrafts which makes short flights on demand. These aircraft will have a limited range, need battery recharging facilities, and require infrastructure with numerous landing pads and �+ facilities that process on-demand passengers and/or cargo. For example, it is estimated that a two-hour trip through Sao Paulo peak traffic can be shortened to an 18-minute ride by eVTOL. x r Personal Delivery Devices are ground transportation automated ' pods capable of making local deliveries. To use the service, customers place an order via a smartphone app. Back at the depot, staff load up the automated pod's secure lockers with customer orders and then send it on its way. When it arrives at a scheduled stop, the customer taps in a code to open the locker and access their delivery. Currently, there are several companies testing automated pod services including Nuro for pizza delivery in Miami and other cities. 172 Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV), or drones, are aircraft without any j Y human pilot, crew or passengers on board. A delivery drone is a UAV used to transport packages, medical supplies, food, or other goods. In November 2020 the FAA proposed airworthiness criteria for type certification of delivery drones with an intent to initialize commercial q operations. Different postal companies from Australia, Switzerland, Germany, Singapore and Ukraine have conducted various drone trials as they test the feasibility and profitability of UAV delivery services. 7.14 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) During the past 20 years, the Florida DOT D6 has designed and built an ITS infrastructure to serve Monroe County. The ITS infrastructure includes CCTV cameras, vehicle detectors, dynamic message signs, and wireless communications. These ITS field devices are monitored and managed from the Transportation Management Center (TMC) located at the Florida DOT D6 Regional Headquarters in Miami-Dade County. The TMC takes an active role in operating, monitoring, and maintaining the 17 signalized intersections, eight emergency signals, two drawbridge signals, and 26 flashing beacons along US 1 in Monroe County from Key Largo to Key West as well as the 17 traffic signals, five High Intensity Activated Crosswalks (HAWK), pedestrian signals, emergency signals, and flashing beacons in Key West. Connected vehicle devices will be added to this ITS infrastructure during the next few years to improve signal performance. ljt t i Figure 9-2: Intelligent Transportation Systems 7.15 Transportation Systems Management and Operations The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines TSM&O as "integrated strategies to optimize the performance of existing infrastructure through the implementation of multimodal and intermodal, cross- jurisdictional systems, services, and projects to preserve capacity and improve security, safety, and reliability of a transportation system." Essentially, TSM&O is a set of strategies that focus on the operational improvements that can maintain and even restore the performance of the existing transportation system before extra capacity is needed. 173 TSM&O includes a broad range of strategies. Table 9-2 below lists several of the operations strategies that have been applied across the country and that have made substantial positive impacts on the safety, mobility, and reliability of the surface transportation network. Table 9-2: TSM&O Strategies 1. Traffic Incident Management 2. Traffic Signal Coordination 3. Work Zone Management 4. Traveler Information 5. Service Patrols (Road Rangers) 6. Freight Management 7. Special Event Management 8. Tolling 9. Road Weather Management 10. Active Traffic Management 11. Transit Management 12. Integrated Corridor Management These strategies, in which ITS and traffic signals play an important role, are most effective when they are considered in early stages of the project development process, sustained over time with dedicated funding, and optimized via coordination among transportation agencies. Many TSM&O strategies have already been deployed or are currently being researched for use in various parts of the state. TSM&O strategies are relatively low in cost compared to adding capacity, can be implemented in two to three years, and yield relatively high benefit-cost ratios. Specifically, these benefits include savings in travel time and delay; improves reliability; decreases vehicle operating costs; and reduces the probability of primary and secondary crashes. In addition to technology applications to support TSM&O, there are many other factors that may be considered in developing TMPs. Table 9-3 presents some of these technology trends and external influences. 174 Table 9-3: Technology Trends and Influences that Support TSM&O Strategies Artificial Intelligence (AI) can play an important role in applying edge processing, predictive analytics and decision support systems to stay ahead of traffic congestion, rather than reacting to it, by implementing optimum solutions based on performance measures defined by the user. Similarly, these tools may be used to maintain transit schedule reliability; optimize freight distribution and logistics; manage special and emergency events; improve asset management systems; and other functions. Augmented Reality(AR) is an interactive system that incorporates three basic features: a combination of real and virtual worlds, real- time interaction, and accurate 3D registration of virtual and real objects. AR can enhance safety by sharing driver information; share real-time traveler information; be used as a planning tool by displaying complex design concepts to a wide audience; and applied to expand the capabilities for maintenance and construction operations. Touchless Activation devices are effective and intelligent ways to safeguard transportation systems users by eliminating the need to touch extremely vulnerable and commonly touched items. It provides human-machine interface without the need for physical touch. Transit kiosks may be retrofitted to include QR codes to provide transit alerts and route information as well as for fare payment. This is playing an important role as a safety measure during and after COVID-1 9. Pll�, . ...... I eCommerce provides an opportunity for freight distribution companies to make their services faster, transparent, and more efficient. By optimizing last mile delivery, eCommerce companies can reduce costs, build their brand value, and enhance the customer experience.As many retailers use third-party services for last-mile, there are collaborative opportunities. Furthermore, automated vehicle applications are beginning to surface. Te ework, or te ecommut ng, is a work arrangement in which employees do not commute or travel to a central place of work, such as an office building, warehouse, or store. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant investments in industries where W telework is now possible, with more people learning how to use remote technology. As a result, a more permanent shift toward lework is anticipated. 175 Big Data enables users to analyze, systematically extract � K information from, or otherwise deal with data sets that are too large Pr2'Yi or complex to be dealt with by traditional data-processing application software. Big data analysis is beginning to play an important role in transportation planning and operations. Many DOTs are developing integrated data platforms to share data with stakeholders allowing users to develop APIs. Digital Twinning is a virtual representation that serves as the real- time digital counterpart of a physical object or process. Digital cities Q� are applying a data-driven approach from planning to performance, k- leveraging digital twins for operating city infrastructure, urban planning, visualization, and simulation to support infrastructure resilience. It can be used to support predictive analytics in estimating impacts to take a proactive role in traffic management. FAST Act Reauthorization, and the Federal Infrastructure Bill, , is currently being developed and is expected to consider new ' policies and priorities to address such programs as electric vehicle � 4 charging systems, broadband communications, and priority for f , safety, equity, accessibility, inclusion, and community partnerships '' .. that incorporate racial equity factors in federal funding programs. In addition to the above, there are other trends and influences that should be considered in long-range transportation planning such as the need for broadband communications, application of blockchain and distributed ledger technology, addressing cybersecurity, feasibility of road user charging, and contributing to the Vision Zero mission in eliminating fatal crashes. 7.16 Assessment of Transportation Technology Trends Each of the transportation technology trends, including ITS and TSM&O strategies, are assessed at a high-level to identify their benefit and applicability to Monroe County. Table 9-4 provides a cursory assessment based on our understanding of the existing and future transportation needs within Monroe County. 176 Table 9-4: Assessment of Technology Trends Technology Benefit/Applicability to the Monroe County US 1 TMP Trends Transportation Technology Trends Shared Mobility Ridesourcing Benefit: Increases efficiency and accessibility of the transportation system. Applicability: Planning for infrastructure support (e.g., curbside management). Carsharing Benefit: Enables the user to avoid the fixed overhead costs of owning a car. Applicability: Planning for infrastructure support (e.g., curbside management). Microtransit Benefit: Accommodates first/last mile connections to complement public transit. Applicability: Extends local and express bus service areas closer to trip O/Ds. Bikesharing Benefit: Reduces vehicle-miles of travel, traffic congestion, and air emissions. Applicability: Planning for bikesharing (dock locations), bike rentals, or both. Active Benefit: Improves efficiency of transportation system, reducing air Transportation emissions. Applicability: Consider planning study to identify priority locations and corridors. Scooter-sharing Benefit: Reduces short trips by vehicles resulting in less traffic congestion, enhanced mobility, and reduced air emissions. Applicability: Consider planning study to identify public acceptance and impacts. Courier Network Benefit: Speed, reliability, safety, and affordability for delivery services. Services Applicability: Consider a planning study to identify user needs. Mobility on Demand (MOD) MOD Trip Planning Benefit: Data integration, customer focused, scalability, and maintenance-free. Applicability: Prepare feasibility study and ConOps to define requirements. Mobility as a Benefit: Customized trip planning and integrated payment to address user Service needs. Applicability: Integrate feasibility study and ConOps with MOD trip planning. Connected Automated Vehicles CAV Connected Benefit: Safety, efficiency, and cost effectiveness in using transportation Vehicles (CV) system. Applicability: Identify use cases considering restrictions in the 5.9GHz spectrum. Automated Benefit: Safety, greater efficiency, less energy consumption, more Vehicles (AV) productivity. Applicability: Conduct Connected Roadway Classification System analysis. Benefit: Safety, mobility, productivity, and less fuel consumption and emissions. 177 Technology Benefit/Applicability to the Monroe County US 1 TMP Trends Cooperative Applicability: Consider in long-range plan recommendations to integrate Automated the automation attributes of all modes of transportation into a cohesive Transportation system. Boring Tunnel Benefit: Reduces the cost, time, and impacts of tunnel construction. System Applicability: Not likely feasible due to high water elevation of US 1 corridor. Electric Vehicles EV Charging Benefit: Reduces air emissions, fuel consumption, and user costs. Stations Applicability: Coordinate with Florida DOT Statewide EV Charging System Plan. Smart Power Benefit: Same benefits as EV Charging Stations without stopping for a Lanes charge. Applicability: Consider pilot program on middle section of US 1 (e.g., Marathon). Public Transportation High Speed Rail Benefit: Higher productivity, economic growth for cities, and job creation. Applicability: Not likely feasible due to high construction and operating costs. Hyperloop Benefit: Very fastspeeds, low power consumption, immune to bad weather. Applicability: Not likely feasible due to high construction and operating costs. Automated Benefit: Enhances mobility, reduces labor costs, encourages joint Guideway Transit development. Applicability: Not likely feasible due to high construction and maintenance costs. Personal Rapid Benefit: Enhances mobility, reduces labor costs, encourages joint Transit development. Applicability: Not likely feasible due to high construction and maintenance costs. Automated Buses Benefit: Reduces expenses on drivers and operations. Applicability: Consider in serving Key West as hiring bus drivers is challenging. Aerial Gondolas Benefit: Reduces ROW requirements, provides scenic views, tourist attraction. Applicability: Identify potential applications for short trips. Water Taxis Benefit: Eliminates ROW requirements, provides scenic views, tourist attraction. Applicability: Identify potential application for select trip O/D pairs. Other Disruptive Technologies Urban Air Mobility Benefit: Schedule reliability and door-to-door service. (eVTOL)/Advanced Applicability: Conduct feasibility study for selected origins and Air Mobility (AAM) destinations. Personal Delivery Benefit: Uses sidewalks and driveways, rather than public roads and Devices highways. Applicability: Consider for least-mile logistics in deliveries. Uncrewed Aerial Benefit: Cost-effective inventory, transportation, and distribution for Vehicles industries. 178 Technology Benefit I Applicability to the Monroe County US 1 TMP Trends Applicability: Consider system requirements for encouraging UAV deliveries. Intelligent Trans ortation Systems ITS ITS Benefit: Reduces incident clearance times, secondary crashes, and congestion. Applicability: Fill in the gaps for ITS field devices (e.g., CCTV cameras, vehicle detectors) and tie into existing microwave communications. Satellite TMC Benefit: Provides a higher level of incident management along US 1 Florida Keys. Applicability: Consider installing workstations at Monroe County Headquarters. Transportation's stems Management and Operations TSM&O Work Zone Benefit: Safety, reliability, queue management, and traveler information. Management Applicability: Coordinate with FDOT D6 to consider smart work zones. Traffic Incident Benefit: Reduces incident clearance times, secondary crashes, driver Management frustration. Applicability: Consider Incident Response Vehicle to serve the US 1 Florida Keys. Service Patrols Benefit: Provides incident management and motorist assist services. Applicability: Consider Road Ranger operations to patrol high incident locations. Special Event Benefit: Reduces traffic and parking problems, improves safety and Management security, reduces stress, and improves the use of transportation options (e.g., transit). Applicability: Consider application of UAVs to monitor special events. Road Weather Benefit: Minimizes impact of weather events to increase safety and Management reliability. Applicability: Incorporate technologies as part of hurricane evacuation plans. Transit Benefit: Improves operational efficiency, schedule reliability, and safety. Management Applicability: Leverage AVL and passenger informations stems. Traffic Signal Benefit: Reduces traffic delays, crashes, energy consumption, and air Coordination emissions. Applicability: Apply ATSPM and CV edge computing to improve signal timing. Traveler Benefit: Provides reliable information for travelers to make smart travel Information choices. Applicability: Coordinate with FDOT D6 to develop customized app for the Keys. Freight Benefit: Improves delivery times, inventory management, customer Management satisfaction. Applicability: Consider freight signal priority at select signals along US 1 corridor. Tolling Benefit: Provides tool to discourage through traffic to use US 1 during Applications eaks. Applicability: Congestion pricing or road user charging would require a feasibility study considering federal guidelines, public acceptance, traffic & revenue analysis, social equity, and other factors. 179 Technology Benefit I Applicability to the Monroe County US 1 TMP Trends Active Traffic Benefit: Applies technologies tooptimize safety and available capacity. Management Applicability: Continue coordination with FDOT D6 in arterial mans ement. Integrated Corridor Benefit: Applies technologies tooptimize "people throughput" capacity. Management Applicability: Not likely to be feasible as there are no parallel facilities to (ICM) US 1. Technology Trends and Influences to Support TSM&O Strategies Artificial Benefits: Decision support systems can be used to manage transportation Intelligence (AI) assets. Applicability: Collaborate with Florida DOT D6 in identifying Al tools to support Monroe Count 's operations and maintenance needs. Augmented Reality Benefit: Enables a better understanding of assumptions for decision- (AR) making. Applicability: Collaborate with Florida DOT D6 in identifying AR tools to support Monroe Count 's planning, operations, and maintenance needs. Touchless Benefit: Promotes infection control (e.g., COVID . Activation Applicability: Consider for information kiosks and bus fare collection systems. eCommerce Benefit: Lower costs, flexibility, speed of delivery, access to remote customers. Applicability: Consider forming a collaborative coalition of freight companies. Telework Benefit: Less impacts on peak period congestion, boosts employee morale. Applicability: Consider how telework impacts LRTP traffic projections. Big Data Benefit: Enable better decision-making and opportunities for innovations. Applicability: Build data platform for transportation planning and operations. Digital Twinning Benefit: Improved processes are tested off-line without disrupting operations. Applicability: Develop digital twin to support planning and operations. FAST Act Benefit: Increase in federal funding and eligibility for technology programs. Reauthorization Applicability: Identify grant opportunities and other federal funding programs. 7.17 Innovative Improvement Recommendations The following recommendations are provided for consideration in the US 1 TMP. These recommendations are based on the assessment of transportation technology trends, external influences, ITS, and TSMO strategies applicable to Monroe County. ■ Shared Mobility — Conduct a planning study to identify user needs to support microtransit, bikesharing, and scooter-sharing. The planning study should address facilities and resources needed, cost estimates, prioritization, implementation timeline, and how these projects may be mainstreamed as part of other transportation improvement projects. This type of shared mobility options may work well in high tourist areas as well as areas with a higher percentage of zero- 180 vehicle households. Based on the census information there are areas in Key Largo with a high percentage of zero-vehicle households and limited bus stops. These shared mobility options can help with last mile connections to complement public transit. Potential areas may be Marathon, Key Largo, Islamorada, and Stock Island. ■ Mobility on Demand —Prepare a feasibility study and Concept of Operations to define the system requirements to implement a Mobility on Demand application to serve Monroe County's transportation needs from a trip planning and integrated fare payment perspective. ■ Connected Automated Vehicles— Coordinate with Florida DOT D6 on the upcoming deployment of the Keys COAST project as well as future needs to address Monroe County's connected vehicle needs and system requirements for traffic signal optimization as well as other use cases. In addition, conduct a Roadway Readiness Analysis to identify infrastructure and system needs to support automated vehicles in the future. Two potential areas for automated busses could be Stock Island to Marathon or the connector from the proposed Key West Intermodal Center on Stock Island to Key West. If automated buses are feasible, consider joining the Automated Bus Consortium. ■ Electric Vehicles — Coordinate with Florida DOT as part of their plan to increase the number of EV charging systems addressing Monroe County's priorities for locations and supporting infrastructure. In addition, coordinate with Florida DOT to conduct a feasibility study and pilot program for a smart power lane on the middle section of US 1 in the Florida Keys (e.g., Marathon). ■ Public Transportation — Conduct a feasibility study and master plan focusing on the application of automated buses, aerial gondolas, and/or water taxis. The planning study should address infrastructure, facility, rolling stock, and resource needs; project development, design, construction, operations, and maintenance cost estimates; ridership forecasts; and an implementation plan identifying timeline, interagency agreements, and funding. Based on a high-level review, it appears that a water taxi between Stock Island and Key West could be a potential option. Aerial gondolas could be explored for short trips (up to 3 miles) to help to relieve congestion in Stock Island, Key West, and Islamorada. ■ Intelligent Transportation Systems— Conduct an analysis, in coordination with Florida DOT D6, to identify gaps in the existing ITS infrastructure including field devices (e.g., CCTV cameras, vehicle detectors) and tie into existing microwave communications. In addition, consider installing workstations at the Monroe County Sheriff's Office to provide a higher level of incident management in the Florida Keys. Also, consider installing technology-based solutions such as Queue Jumper or Transit Signal Priority (TSP). TSP is a technology that reduces the delay to transit vehicles at 181 signalized intersections. Implementing TSP along fixed-route transit lines will improve on-time performance and reliability of service. Where implemented, buses equipped with TSP technology wirelessly communicate with upcoming traffic signals. The signals can then temporarily extend a green phase to allow the bus to clear the intersection. ■ Transportation Systems Management and Operations — Continue coordination with Florida DOT D6 in mainstreaming TSM&O strategies to address Monroe County's needs. This may include development and application of Big Data, Digital Twinning, and Artificial Intelligence tools to support planning, operations, and maintenance. In addition, a freight initiative may be formed to promote collaboration among eCommerce companies modeled after Transportation Demand Management programs. The FDOT District 6 has initiated a freight improvement study, which is expected to be completed within one or two years. ■ Traffic Incident Management - Assess the feasibility of operating Road Rangers patrolling or staged at high incident locations along the upper, middle, and lower Keys as well as more active use of the Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) program to address severe incidents. RISC is an incentive-based program that requires specialized equipment and trained operators to quickly remove wreckage from the roadway, where major crashes close most lanes or causes significant travel delays. In Monroe County, RISC may be activated by Florida Highway Patrol as well as Monroe County Sheriff's Office. Additionally, having qualified Traffic Homicide Investigators (THI) located within Monroe County would help expedite the traffic homicide investigations and thus reduce the impact of major lane/road closures on traffic flow and secondary crashes. ■ Air Taxis—Consider public-private partnerships with emerging transportation technology providers to move people and goods more efficiently to the Keys. Such technologies include uncrewed air mobility (eVTOL) which will require planning of the infrastructure and systems as well as charging stations at intermittent stations between Miami and Key West. An eVTOL may be challenging at Key West because of the proximity to the Naval Air Station (NAS). The airspace is restricted. The NAS requires flights to be 3 to 4 miles off the coast when transitioning through their airspace. Also, the aircraft will need to carry water emergency gear, which may impact the weight of the vehicle and therefore the distance the vehicle can fly without charging. The Aircraft will likely need a stop halfway from the mainland to adhere to the fuel reserve requirements as the distance from MIA to Key West is 159 miles. Other airports which may be considered for vertiports are Boca Chica (NAS), Sugarloaf, Marathon, Tavernaero, and Ocean Reef). 182 Despite the challenges, there are eVTOL manufacturers/operators considering routes to Key West with potential stops along the way. Most manufacturers are considering 2023 as the year vehicles will be certified and in flight. These recommendations are offered in addition to the safety, operations, transit, water transportation, and roadway improvements discussed earlier. As the TMP is developed, the combined recommendations should be bundled together, as applicable, to gain cost efficiency. 183 10 Funding Analysis Various Federal, state, and local sources of funding are available for transportation infrastructure projects in the form of formula funds, grants, loans, and other special financing mechanisms. The typical sources of funding—existing or potential—for projects in Monroe County are discussed in this section. The funding source, estimated amounts, eligibility criteria, and deadlines (if applicable) are described. Typically, the transportation needs and associated project costs are far greater than available transportation revenues—a common challenge facing many public agencies. However, even if funds are not available for prioritized projects, this does not mean that a cost feasibility analysis should be viewed as a meaningless exercise. Projects that are not fiscally constrained become part of the illustrative list of projects. Identifying these projects is important as this document and can be amended to add projects to the fiscally constrained list of priorities change and/or additional funding becomes available. The purpose of this document is to provide Monroe County with an estimate of possible funding from traditional revenue sources to support transportation investments for FY 2021-2040. This section outlines Federal, state, and local sources of revenue for funding transportation improvements, describes the methodology and assumptions developed to forecast future revenues, and summarizes anticipated amounts from revenue sources that may be available for County transportation projects. The section also discusses potential new and additional revenue sources from untapped local funding options that could be used for transportation. All values presented in the analysis are in year of expenditure dollars (YOE). 7.18 Federal Funding Sources The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law on December 4, 2015, by President Obama. It authorized $305 billion for fiscal years 2016 to 2020 for highway, safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, research, technology, and statistics programs. The FAST Act provided the first dedicated source of Federal funding for freight projects. Federal funding for transportation is derived in part from highway excise taxes (i.e., taxes paid when purchases are made on a specific good) on motor fuel and truck-related taxes on truck tires, sales of trucks and trailers, and heavy vehicle use. Excise taxes on gasoline and other motor fuels account for more than 85 percent of all receipts to the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF). Tax revenues are 184 deposited into either the Highway Account or the Mass Transit Account of the Federal HTF and then distributed to the states. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) then distribute funds from the Highway and the Mass Transit Accounts, respectively, to each state through a system of formula grants and discretionary allocations. The FAST Act extended the imposition of highway-user taxes through September 30, 2022, with generally no change to the tax rates as imposed under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). According to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), since 2001 outlays have consistently exceeded the revenues to the trust fund. To address the shortfall, Congress has authorized transfers from the General Fund to the HTF to prevent the HTF from being depleted. Under the FAST Act 2021 Continuing Resolution, $10.4 billion was transferred to the Highway Account and $3.2 billion to the Transit Account, allowing the accounts to pay their obligations through the end of FY 2021. Currently, there are on-going discussions concerning the reauthorization of the FAST Act, or a similar transportation bill. The following sections list and describe the Federal, state, and local existing and potential funding sources for infrastructure projects. Monroe County may or may not be a recipient of these sources; they are provided for informational purposes only. Funding levels are provided for many sources, but only those included in the final table may be reasonably assumed to be available for new County transportation projects; it is assumed that the majority of the funding sources described in this document are dedicated for existing projects and/or Monroe County is not a funding recipient. 7.19 Formula Funds Under the FAST Act, several programs are available for funding infrastructure. Funding allocations are provided for the following programs (before post-apportionment set asides, penalties, and sequestration): National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), construction of new facilities on the NHS, and ensuring that investments achieve the performance targets established by state asset management plans. Funds are apportioned based on formulas to each state, and states divide the funds among apportioned programs. Eligible activities include reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, and preservation of bridges on non-NHS highways; projects that reduce the risk of failure of NHS 185 infrastructure; and subsidies for projects under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA). Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $1.2 billion. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program: The program provides flexible spending to states based on apportionment formulas for state and local transportation needs. Eligible projects include the construction of highways, bridges, tunnels, transit capital projects, operational improvements, safety infrastructure projects, parking facilities, recreational trails, bicycle and pedestrian projects, planning and design of roadways and interstates, surface transportation planning, travel demand management strategies, congestion pricing, and numerous others as found in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(15). Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $616.9 million. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): The HSIP aims to reduce traffic fatalities and injuries on all public roads through a data-driven approach that focuses on performance. Funds are apportioned as a lump sum to the states to divide among programs. Eligible activities include safety projects that are consistent with the State's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and that correct or improve hazardous road locations or features. Eligible projects may include vehicle-to-infrastructure communications equipment, pedestrian hybrid beacons, roadway improvements (including medians) to separate pedestrians and motor vehicles, and other physical projects. Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $126.0 million. Railway-Highway Crossings Program: The program provides funds for safety improvements that reduce fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings. Funding is apportioned based on formulas and considers the number of public crossings by state. Eligible activities include relocation of highways to eliminate grade crossings and projects that eliminate hazards posed by idling trains on crossings. Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $9.4 million. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): The CMAQ program provides flexible funding to state and local governments for transportation projects that help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funds are available for projects that reduce congestion and improve air quality in non-attainment areas. Funds are apportioned to states to divide among localities. Eligible activities include projects or programs that contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a national ambient air quality standard, have a high level of effectiveness in reducing air pollution, and are included in the MPO's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Electric and natural gas vehicles are eligible. Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $14.7 million. Metropolitan Planning Program: The program establishes a framework for metropolitan transportation investment decisions. Funds are apportioned by state. MPOs are required to compile 186 metropolitan transportation plans, transportation improvement programs, and long-range transportation plans. MPOs should make plans that improve transportation system resiliency and reliability, reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation, and enhance travel and tourism. Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $22.5 million. National Highway Freight Program: The program aims to improve the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network(NHFN).A lump sum is apportioned by state and then divided among programs at the local level. Eligible activities include projects and programs that contribute to the efficient movement of freight as identified in the state's freight plan. Examples may include ramp metering, truck-only lanes, adding or widening shoulders, adding road capacity to address highway freight bottlenecks, separation of passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles, and other projects. Florida's estimated apportionment for FY 2021 is $71.8 million. 7.20 Competitive Grants Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE): The Consolidated Appropriations Act (2021) appropriated $1 billion to be awarded by the USDOT for National Infrastructure Investments. This appropriation stems from the RAISE program (previously known as TIGER and BUILD), which was funded and implemented pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Funds for the FY 2021 RAISE Transportation grants program are to be awarded on a competitive basis for surface transportation infrastructure projects that will have a significant national or regional impact. Under the most recent round of submissions, projects seeking funding must have met eligibility requirements, and applications and were due July 12, 2021; awards will be announced in November 2021. Projects are awarded based on the application package, review by USDOT, and ultimately the USDOT Secretary's recommendation. Projects that show strong partnerships among stakeholders, both public and private, are better posed to win. In addition, projects must submit a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) that demonstrates the project has greater benefits than it costs to construct and operate, i.e., a benefit-cost ratio of greater than 1.0. Minimum grant awards are $1 million for rural areas and $5 million for urban areas, with a maximum award of$25 million. The FY 2021 RAISE funds are available for obligation through September 30, 2024; construction is expected to begin upon obligation and all funds must be expended by September 30, 2029. Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA): Like the RAISE grant program, INFRA is a competitive grant program. Established under the FAST Act, it aims to fund nationally and regionally significant freight projects. The Federal share of the project may not exceed 80 percent, with 60 187 percent maximum of INFRA grant funds. Eligible projects include highway freight projects on the NHFN, highway or bridge projects that add capacity to an interstate or a national scenic area, grade separation projects, and intermodal, rail, or port freight projects. The minimum award is $5 million for small projects and $25 million for large projects. Projects are evaluated based on selection criteria including the results of a BCA and an application narrative. The Secretary of USDOT ultimately makes the final award recommendations. The most recent round of INFRA (FY 2021) was authorized up to $889 million. FY 2021 INFRA applications were due in March 2021 and awards were announced in summer 2021. FY 2021 INFRA funds must be obligated by September 30, 2024 and construction must begin by March 30, 2026. Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs: These grant programs administered through the Economic Development Authority (EDA), a bureau within the Department of Commerce, provide investments that support construction, non-construction, technical assistance, and revolving loan fund projects on a competitive merit basis. Eligible applicants must be public or private non-profit organizations acting in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a state. Projects must demonstrate economic distress under one or more of the following criteria: (i) an unemployment rate that is at least one percentage point greater than the national average unemployment rate for the most recent 24-month period for which data are available; (ii) per capita income that is 80 percent or less of the national average per capita income for the most recent period for which data are available; or(iii) a "Special Need,"as determined by EDA. See the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for details on economic distress, including how the EDA defines special need. Monroe County had an unemployment rate of 1.6 percent in 2019, compared to a national unemployment rate of 2.9 percent. Furthermore, based on Census data, Monroe County had a per capita income of $48,347 in 2019 according to Census data. With a per capita income of $35,672 nationally in 2019, the per capita income of Monroe is 136 percent of the national. Resultantly, Monroe County does not quality as an economically distressed area. The Economic Development Administration (EDA) supports development in economically distressed areas of the United States by fostering job creation and attracting private investment.19 The Public Works Program awarded over $125 million to fund 73 projects in FY 2019, resulting in an average award size of $1.7 million per project.20 The Economic Adjustment Assistance Program awarded "Economic Development Administration,FY 2020 EDA Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs including CARES Act Funding,2020.https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppTd=321695 20 Economic Development Administration,FY 2019 Annual Report, 2019. https://eda.gov/files/annual- reports/fy20l 9/FY2019-Approved-EDA-Annual-Report.pdf 188 nearly $418 million to fund 231 projects in FY 2019, resulting in an average award size of$1.8 million per project.21 Eligible projects may apply on an ongoing basis as there is no deadline for the current NOFO. 7.21 Transit In Monroe County, transit services are offered by the City of Key West Department of Transportation (KWDoT). According to the National Transit Database (NTD), KWDoT receives Federal, state, and local funding for capital improvement and operating costs. Monroe County is not an urbanized area, and therefore is not an eligible recipient for FTA programs that fund capital and/or operating improvements such as Section 5307 and Section 5337. FTA Formula Funds — Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas. The City of Key West receives rural public transit formula funding as a subrecipient of FDOT under the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5311 program. According to the City of Key West Transit Development Plan (July 2019),22 and NTD, Section 5311 funding in FY 2021 is $0.5 million for operating activities and about $0.2 million for capital improvement. A local match of 20 percent is required for capital projects and 50 percent for operating. FTA Formula Grants for the Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Program for Rural Areas —Section 5339. FDOT administers Federal formula funds to transit agencies in rural areas (population less than 50,000). All eligible Section 5311 subrecipients are eligible to receive rural Section 5339 funding. Many projects are eligible for Federal funding under this program including projects to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment, and projects to construct bus-related facilities. More details regarding the program are found in the FDOT Section 5339 Application Instruction Manual. According to the NTD, the City of Key West used about $57,000 from Section 5339 funds for capital activities in 2019. FDOT. Because Key West is not designated as an urban area, Key West Transit relies on rural and some non-traditional funding sources from FDOT. FDOT transfers additional funding from the Federal Highway Program to the 5311 transit program, as allowed through the flexible program authorizations authorized by Congress. The State of Florida Public Transit Block Grant program funding from FDOT is estimated to total $0.2 million in FY 2021 as found in the City of Key West Transit Development Plan (July 2019). '-' Ibid. 22 City of Key West Transit Development Plan(July 2019),https://carfreecities.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Key- West-TDP-Draft-Report-Large-File.pdf 189 Funding for Major Transit Capital Investments.Additional funding for major transit investments can be made available through Federal and state discretionary programs, namely FTA's Capital Investment Grants Program (CIG) (Section 5309) and FDOT's State competitive New Starts Transit Program. Few eligible projects seeking Florida New Starts funding actually receive funding. Projects applying for FTA funding go through a multiyear, multistep process to be eligible and are evaluated based on project justification and local financial commitment criteria. The FTA Section 5309 funding program is chronically oversubscribed and thus extremely competitive. Although eligible New Starts/Small Starts/Core Capacity projects could request the statutory maximum Federal share of 80 percent, the historical average Federal share for projects is roughly 50 percent. New and expanded ferry systems are eligible for funding. Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Funds. After allocations to the Small County Outreach Program and the New Starts Transit Program, 25 percent of the remaining Documentary Stamp Tax funds are allocated annually for TRIP for regional transportation projects in "regional transportation areas." The first $60 million of TRIP funds are allocated annually to the Florida Rail Enterprise. TRIP will fund up to 50 percent of eligible project costs. TRIP is a highly competitive program; a small portion of eligible projects actually receive funding. Transit Fares. Key West Transit offers two routes in the City of Key West and a Lower Keys shuttle between Key West and Marathon. Fare revenues, ranging from $0.50 to $4.00 per ride, partially support the system's operations. Fare revenues in FY 2021, as found in the City of Key West Transit Development Plan (July 2019), total $0.5 million for operations. FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Program. In FY 2021, FTA announced $38 million for capital projects to support existing or establish new passenger ferry services, and to repair and modernize ferry facilities and equipment. Applications are due October 5, 2021. Funds will be available for five-years after awards are announced. Monroe County could not apply directly but could support designated recipients in their applications. 7.22 State Funding Sources In Florida, there are five revenue sources that go into the State Transportation Trust Fund (STTF): fuel tax, motor vehicle fees, document stamps, rental car surcharges, and aviation fuel tax. These sources are described below but because they are already earmarked for projects, they are excluded from this analysis. 190 7.22.1 State-Highway Funding The following programs are assumed to be allocated to specific projects; as a result, no anticipated additional revenues are expected to be allocated to new County projects. Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Highways Construction and Right-of-Way (ROW). This funding program is used to fund construction, improvements, and associated ROW acquisitions on SIS highways (i.e., Interstate, the Turnpike, other toll roads, and other facilities designed to serve interstate and regional commerce, including SIS Connectors). FDOT takes the lead in identifying planned projects and programs funded by this program. The SIS First Five-year Plan (FY 2020/2021- FY 2024/2025), Second Five-year Plan (FY 2025/2026-FY 2029/2030), and the Long-Range Cost- Feasible Plan (FY 2029-2045) are posted on FDOT websites.21 SIS projects within Monroe County can be identified from these plans and their costs can be used as available program funds. Additional funding for PE is not available for SIS. Other Arterials (also known as Other Roads) Construction and ROW. This funding program is used to fund construction, improvements, and associated ROW on State Highway System roadways not designated as part of the SIS. This program also includes funding for the Economic Development Program, the County Incentive Grant Program, the Small County Road Assistance Program, and the Small County Outreach Program. District-Wide State Highway System (SHS) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Funds. This funding program is used to provide financial assistance to activities to support and maintain transportation infrastructure once it is constructed and in place. 7.22.2 State Fuel Taxes Highway fuel taxes constitute the oldest continuous source of dedicated transportation revenues in the State. Initially, it was levied in 1921 at the rate of 1 cent per gallon of motor fuel. Since then, the state fuel tax has been adjusted and restructured in the form that it is levied. The fuel taxes collected at the state level include the following:" State Fuel Sales Tax—Currently, Florida imposes a sales tax to the sales of all motor (gasoline) and diesel fuels. The state fuel sales tax is based on a floor tax of 6.9 cents per gallon indexed to the 23 Florida Department of Transportation, SIS Plans and Projects, https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/programs/msp i/plans/default.shtm 24 Florida's Transportation Tax Sources, A Primer,FDOT Office of Comptroller—General Accounting Office, 2021,https://fdotewp].dot.state.fl.us/FMSupportApps/Documents/pra/Primer.pdf 191 consumer price index(CPI, all items), with the base year set as FY 1989 (12-month period). Currently, the rate is 14.5 cents per gallon after adjusting for inflation. State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System (SCETS) Tax—The SCETS is an excise tax on all highway fuels. To the extent possible, the SCETS proceeds must be spent in the transportation district and County from which they are collected. Similar to the fuel sales tax, the SCETS tax is indexed to the CPI (all items), but with the base year set as FY 1990 (12-month period). The 2021 SCETS tax rate for Monroe County is 8.0 cents per gallon. State-Collected Motor Fuel Taxes Distributed to Local Governments— The State of Florida collects a fuel excise tax of 4 cents per gallon to be distributed to local governments based on formulas that consider, among other factors, population. The Constitutional Fuel Tax is set at 2 cents per gallon. The first call on the proceeds of the Constitutional Fuel Tax is to meet the debt service requirements, if any, on local bond issues backed by the tax proceeds. The balance, called the 20 percent surplus and the 80 percent surplus, is credited to the counties' transportation trust funds. The allocation formula is based on a geographic area component, a population component, and a collection component; in addition, a distribution factor is applied to each county. Monroe County will receive an estimated $2.4 million in FY 2021. The County Fuel Tax is set at 1 cent per gallon, and it is distributed by the same formula as the Constitutional Fuel Tax(based on a geographic area component, a population component, a collection component, and a distribution factor). Counties may use the revenues from this tax for transportation- related expenses. Monroe County will receive an estimated $1.1 million in FY 2021. Lastly, the Municipal Fuel Tax is also set at 1 cent per gallon. Revenues from this tax are transferred into the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund for Municipalities. These revenues may be used for transportation-related expenditures within incorporated areas and are distributed to municipalities by statutory criteria. The Municipal Revenue Sharing program is comprised of state sales tax and municipal fuel tax, and beginning January 1, 2024, a portion of the excise tax levied on natural gas fuel. In FY 2021, Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon are slated to receive approximately $0.3 million, $38,000, $1.4 million, $9,000, and $0.4 million respectively, from the Municipal Fuel Tax. These funds are not expected to be available for County transportation projects. Alternative Fuel Fees — Use of alternative fuels represents a small part of the State's total fuel consumption and historically amounted to less than $1 million annually. In order to encourage the use of alternative fuels, the 2013 Florida Legislature passed legislation to exempt these fuels from taxation 192 beginning January 1, 2014 and ending January 1, 2019. After January 1, 2019, there is now a per unit tax that is lower than the rates for gasoline and diesel but revenue-neutral to the previous in-state annual decal fee. Fuel Use Tax—This tax is designed to ensure that heavy vehicles that engage in interstate operations incur taxes based on fuel consumed, rather than purchased, in the State. This tax applies, with few exceptions, to each privately owned vehicle with at least three axles or a gross weight of more than 26,000 pounds that engages in interstate operations, whether or not titled in the State. The tax is comprised of an annual decal fee of$4 plus a use tax based on the number of gallons of fuel consumed multiplied by the prevailing statewide fuel tax rate. If a vehicle consumes more fuel than was purchased during a reporting period, additional taxes are due; otherwise a refund is issued. Assumptions for State-Collected Fuel Taxes Distributed to Local Governments Revenues from the Constitutional and County fuel taxes were estimated at $33.5 million over the FY 2021-2040 period, which excludes the set aside for the administration of local transportation programs. The forecast of reasonably available revenues was developed applying the following assumptions: Base year (FY 2021) estimates for the Constitutional and County fuel taxes were obtained from the 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(December 2020). The 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook (December 2020) also provides estimates of the Municipal Sharing Program revenues for the base year by municipality (Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon). These funds are not expected to be available for County transportation projects. Annual growth will be in line with fuel consumption growth as found in the 2018 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(September 2018) and 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(December 2020). Motor fuel consumption has declined 7 percent annually from FY 2019- 2021 and diesel fuel consumption has declined 2 percent per year over the same period. Fifteen percent is set aside for the administration of local transportation programs. 7.22.3 State Motor Vehicle Fees Funding transportation from vehicle-related revenues started early in Florida's transportation history. Almost from their inception, motor vehicle license fees were designated as a highway user charge levied to partially defray the costs of constructing and maintaining the roads which benefited those who paid the fees. 193 There are four types of motor vehicle fees:25 Initial Registration Fee— Known originally as the "New Wheels on the Road" Fee, it is designed primarily to affect only those vehicle owners whose actions result in net additions to the State's registered vehicle stock. The Initial Registration Fee is $225. Motor Vehicle License Surcharge— Currently the State imposes a $1.20 surcharge on the annual registration fee of every vehicle except mobile homes. Of each transaction, $1 is deposited to the STTF and the remaining 20 cents is deposited to Highway Safety and Operating Trust Fund. Motor Vehicle Title Fee—The current Motor Vehicle Title Fee is $70. Prior to 2012, 70 percent of the proceeds ($49)were deposited to the General Revenue Fund and 30 percent ($21)to the STTF. Title fee revenues from for-hire vehicles are deposited into the General Revenue Fund. The 2012 Legislature directed that the first $200 million collected from $47 of the $49 General Revenue Fund portion of the $70 title fee be deposited into the STTF, beginning FY 2012-2013. This amount was transferred to the General Fund for FY 2012-2013 only. Rental Car Surcharge—The existing rental car surcharge rate is $2 per day for the first 30 days. The STTF receives 80 percent of the surcharge after 15.75 percent goes to the Tourism Promotional Trust Fund and 4.25 percent to the Florida International Trade and Promotion Trust Fund. The tax distributed to the STTF is unique in that its proceeds must be spent in the transportation district from which the surcharges were collected. In addition, car-sharing services pay only $1 if the rental is less than 24 hours and $2 per day thereafter; surcharges are distributed the same as other rentals. 7.22.4 State Aviation Fuel Tax Florida imposes an aviation fuel tax of 4.27 cents per gallon excise tax on aviation fuels; this is a recent change due to the repeal of aviation refunds that were available to certain airlines meeting employment targets in the state. Unlike the state fuel tax, the aviation tax remains fixed at its current level until changed by legislative action. Ninety-two percent of the proceeds are deposited into the STTF, while the remaining eight percent are deposited into the General Revenue Fund. 7.22.5 State Documentary Stamp Tax The Documentary Stamp Tax is levied on documents, including, but not limited to deeds, stocks and bonds, notes and written obligations to pay money, mortgages, liens, and other evidences of "Florida's Transportation Tax Sources, A Primer,FDOT Office of Comptroller—General Accounting Office, 2021, https://fdotewp 1.dot.state.fl.us/FMSupportApps/Documents/pra/Primer.pdf 194 indebtedness. The 2005 Legislature passed a growth management bill to address needed infrastructure in Florida. The growth management package provided $541.75 million annually from documentary stamp revenue to fund transportation needs. The 2008 Legislature changed the distribution of documentary stamp tax collections so that the STTF receives 38.2 percent of collections after other distributions are made, not to exceed $541.75 million per year. This formula significantly decreased the funding for transportation projects. Additionally, the 2011 Legislature directed the following amounts to be transferred to the State Economic Enhancement and Development (SEED) Trust Fund from the STTF portion of Documentary Stamp Tax revenues: $50 million in FY 2012-2013, $65 million in FY 2013-2014, and $75 million every FY thereafter. In 2014, voters approved for 20 years that 33 percent of the revenues from the Documentary Stamp Fund would go to the Land Acquisition Trust Fund for water and land conservation, resulting in the revenues available to the STFF declining from 38.2 percent to 24.18442 percent. The August 2020 Revenue Estimating Conference estimated $352 million in distributions of documentary stamp revenue to the STTF for FY 2020.26 7.23 Local and Local-Option Funding Sources Beyond the traditional Federal and state fuel taxes, several local and local-option revenue sources are available for funding transportation improvement projects in Monroe County. These alternative revenue sources include local option fuel taxes and tourism taxes. In addition, transit services provided by Key West Transit are funded through property taxes, fare revenues, and other dedicated revenue sources. This section summarizes these local and local-option revenue sources. 7.23.1 Local Option Fuel Taxes County governments in Florida are authorized to levy up to 12 cents per gallon of fuel through three local option fuel taxes (LOFT) for transportation needs: the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax (1 cent per gallon of gasoline and diesel), the First LOFT (up to 6 cents per gallon of gasoline and diesel), and the Second LOFT (up to 5 cents per gallon of gasoline). Monroe County has adopted the Ninth-Cent, the First LOFT at the maximum 6 cents per gallon, and the Second LOFT at the maximum 5 cents per gallon. Revenues from these local option fuel taxes are forecast at $31.1 million over 20 years (FY 2021- 2040), based on the following assumptions: 26 Florida's Transportation Tax Sources, A Primer,FDOT Office of Comptroller—General Accounting Office, 2021, https://fdotewp I.dot.state.fl.us/FMSupportApps/Documents/pra/Primer.pdf 195 Base year(FY 2021) estimates for the Ninth-Cent, First LOFT, and Second LOFT were obtained from the 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(December 2020). The 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook (December 2020) also provides estimates of the Municipal Sharing Program revenues for the base year by municipality (Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon). These funds are not expected to be available for County transportation projects. Annual growth will be in line with fuel consumption growth as found in the 2018 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(September 2018) and 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(December 2020). Motor fuel consumption has declined 7 percent annually from FY 2019- 2021 and diesel fuel consumption has declined 2 percent per year over the same period. The Ninth-Cent The Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax was initially authorized in 1972 by the Florida Legislature. The tax is limited to 1 cent per gallon on highway fuels. Originally, the tax could be proposed by a county's governing body, but it had to be approved by the electorate in a countywide referendum. The 1993 Florida Legislature allowed a county's government body to impose the tax by a majority plus one vote of its membership, without holding a referendum. Counties are not required to share revenue from the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax with municipalities; however, the proceeds of the tax may be shared with cities in whatever proportion is mutually agreed upon and used for county or municipal transportation purposes. The tax has no time limit imposed on it by state statutes. As of January 1, 1994, the Ninth-Cent Tax on diesel fuel is no longer optional. The 1990 Legislature decided to realize all optional taxes on diesel fuel so that interstate truckers, who pay fuel taxes based on miles driven in the state, would be subject to standard tax rates. According to the 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook, the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax will generate nearly $495,000 in FY 2021. Assuming continuation over the 20 years, the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax is forecast to generate $6.5 million. The First LOFT The 1983 Florida Legislature provided local governments with two major new sources of revenue called the Local Option Gas Taxes (LOGT)that were renamed the Local Option Fuel Taxes (LOFT) in 1996. Up to 11 cents per gallon may be levied to help fund a variety of transportation projects. These taxes include the First LOFT(6 cents)and the Second LOFT(5 cents). Monroe County currently levies the full First and Second LOFTs. 196 The First LOFT is authorized for a maximum duration of 30 years, at which time it must be voted on for extension. Implementation of 1 to 6 cents per gallon tax requires a simple majority vote of the County commissioners. The proceeds of the tax must be shared with municipalities, either by a mutually agreed-upon distribution scheme or, if agreement cannot be reached, by using a formula contained in the Florida Statute. Local governments may pledge revenues from any portion of the LOFT to repay state bonds issued on their behalf. In addition, a local government must use LOFT revenues for transportation expenditures on the state or local highway systems or transit-oriented capital purchases, or operations. Transportation expenditures include ROW activities, roadway maintenance, and the construction of roads. The proceeds of the First LOFT are shared with Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon. Overall, the First LOFT will generate approximately $2.8 million in FY 2021, of which about$1.8 million will be distributed to the municipalities and the remainder goes to the unincorporated Monroe County, based on estimates provided in the 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook. Over 20 years, the First LOFT is forecast to generate $12.0 million. The Second LOFT The 1993 Florida Legislature extended the scope of the LOFT to include an additional fuel tax of up to 5 cents per gallon of gasoline. Diesel fuel is not subject to this tax. Implementation of the second tax of 1 to 5 cents per gallon requires a majority plus one vote of the County Commissioners. The proceeds of the tax must still be shared with municipalities, either by mutually agreed-upon distribution scheme, or by using the state formula. Pursuant to Section 336 of the Florida Statutes, local governments may only use revenues from the tax for transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted comprehensive plan. As of January 1, 2021, Monroe County issues all 5 cents of the Second LOFT. Revenues from implementing the 5 cents per gallon of the Second LOFT are forecast at$12.7 million over 20 years (FY 2021-2040). 7.23.2 Local Option Sales Tax Local governments are also authorized by the State to levy some sales taxes to address their transportation needs. The maximum potential local sales tax rate in Monroe County is 2 percent; as of December 2020, the local sales tax rate is set at 1.5 percent, leaving the County with a local sales tax potential of an additional 0.5 percent. The existing local option sales taxes are the Local Government 197 Infrastructure Surtax (called the Community Investment Tax, at 1 percent) and the School Capital Outlay surtax (at 0.5 percent). The revenues from an additional 0.5 percent local option sales tax that could be levied are not eligible for transportation uses and therefore are not included as a potential revenue source. The Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax comes from transfers from the state sales and communications services taxes; it is discussed in this section because its proceeds go to the local governments. Sales tax revenues are assumed to grow in line with Monroe County population as found from the American Community Survey for 2010 and 2019;27 the annual growth is estimated to be 0.14 percent per year over the analysis period. Local Government Infrastructure Surtax The Local Government Infrastructure Tax can be levied at a rate of 0.5 percent or 1 percent. Counties cannot levy a combined rate exceeding 1 percent of the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax, Small County, Indigent Care and Trauma Center, and County Public Hospital surtaxes. Therefore, Monroe County is at the statutory maximum. Revenues from the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax are used to acquire, construct, and improve general government, public education, and public safety infrastructure to promote the health, safety, and welfare of Monroe County residents. The surtax was adopted by referendum, and an extension must be approved by voters; its expiration date has extended to December 31, 2033. Eligible uses of the tax revenues include financing, planning, and constructing infrastructure. The proceeds are shared by the County and its five municipalities of Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon. The base year (FY 2021) County estimate of $19.4 million is based on data from the 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook. The estimated revenues to the County and five cities assumes the surtax's renewal after 2033. In total, Monroe County can expect revenues of $553.3 million over FY 2021-2040. 27 American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2010 and 2019, https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=employment&g=0500000US 12087&tid=ACSDP 1 Y2019.DP03 198 Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax The Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax distributes a portion of the state's sales tax back to counties and local governments through formulas. The funds may be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. The proceeds are shared by the County and its five municipalities of Islamorada, Key Colony Beach, Key West, Layton, and Marathon. The 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook estimates the FY 2021 distribution to Monroe County at$10.7 million. Over the 20-years (FY 2021-2040), it is estimated to total $306.2 million. 7.23.3 Tourist Development and Tourist Impact Fees Monroe County imposes a 12.5 percent tax on any establishment that rents accommodations for a period of six months or less, including hotels, motels, guest houses, campgrounds, seasonal rentals, and efficiencies. It is made up of a 7.5 percent Sales Tax, 4 percent Tourist Tax, and 1 percent Tourist Impact Fee. Of the Tourist Tax, 2 percent is used for promotional purposes, events, and administration; this is known as the"generic two penny fund,"while the other 2 percent is for District expenditures and as such is known as the "district two penny fund." Of the Tourist Impact Fee, half goes to the County General Fund and the other half to the Land Trust. It is assumed that none of the Tourist Impact Fee is eligible for transportation uses. The tax proceeds are used generally for capital construction of tourist-related facilities, tourist promotion, and beach and shoreline maintenance. However, the authorized uses vary. Funds have been used for parking, sidewalks, train improvements, and scenic highways. As such, there is potential that the revenues could be used for additional transportation capital projects; 35.5 percent of the District Two Penny went to capital projects in 2020. Therefore, only 35.5 percent of the District Two Penny revenues may be available for use. Estimated at $6.5 million in FY 2021, the revenues total $186.3 million over 2021-2040. There is an additional 2 percent that can be levied for the Tourist Development and Tourist Impact Fee through the Professional Sports Franchise Facilities Tax (1 percent) and the Additional Professional Sports Franchise Facilities Tax (1 percent).21 However, the proceeds of the Professional Sports Franchise Facilities Tax can only be used to pay debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of professional sports franchise facilities. As a result, these revenues are not eligible for transportation uses. "Florida Department of Revenue,Realized and Unrealized Revenues by County: LFY 2010-2021,December 1,2020, http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/l ocal-government/data/data-a-to-z/real i zedtouri sm.xl s 199 7.23.4 Ad Valorem Taxes According to Florida Statutes, local governments may levy ad valorem taxes based on the assessed value of property. Ad valorem taxes are subject to the following rate limitations: • Ten mills for County purposes • Ten mills for municipal purposes • Ten mills for school purposes • A millage fixed by law for a County furnishing municipal services; and • A millage authorized by law and approved by voters for special districts. Levies from ad valorem taxes provide funding for programs that have countywide benefit, such as services to the elderly and children, emergency management and emergency dispatch functions, jail operations and law enforcement, and fire services, among others. The Monroe County Board of Commissioners set the ad valorem millage rate for the General Fund, Fine & Forfeiture, Middle Keys Health Care, Lower & Middle Keys Fire Rescue, General Purpose MSTU, Parks and Beaches and Municipal Policing Funds.29 While ad valorem taxes are authorized to be collected to meet annual debt service requirements for the payment of voter approved general obligation bonds, Monroe County does not currently use ad valorem debt financing. The aggregate millage rate for the County in FY 2021 is 3.3435. In addition, entities such as the Mosquito Control District, the South Florida Water Management District, and the Monroe County School Board are all authorized by the State to levy their own ad valorem taxes independent of those set by the County. Less than one percent of Monroe County's general fund supported transportation projects in FY 2021. In addition, municipalities within Monroe County are authorized to levy ad valorem taxes. The millage rate for the City of Key West was 2.1535 in 2020.31 Overlapping millage rates for residents of Key West include millage collected by Monroe County, the School Board, South Florida Water Management District, and the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District. Approximately 10 percent of the City's expenditures on governmental activities funded the City's transportation program; none of which were sourced by the City's general fund. "Monroe County,Florida,Adopted Annual Operating&Capital Budget Summary,FY 2021. https://www.monroecoutity- fl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/25750/FY2]-Adopted-Budget-Summary "City of Key West,Comprehensive Annual Financial Report,FY Ended September 30, 2020. https://www.cityotkeywest-t7.gov/DocumentCenter/Viexv/4960/2020-Comprehensive-Annual-Finance-Report-PDF 200 The City of Marathon has adopted a millage rate of 2.59 for FY 2021.31 Similar to the City of Key West, overlapping millage rates for residents of Marathon include millage collected by Monroe County, the School Board, South Florida Water Management District, and the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District. Key Colony Beach and Layton, the other local jurisdictions in Monroe County, have populations of approximately 800 and 200, respectively. Due to the small tax bases and municipal budgets of those communities, ad valorem revenues were not assessed as potential funds for transportation projects. 7.24 Potential New Funding Sources This section examines the potential revenues of the taxes or fees that are not in place in Monroe County, but that could be implemented to support transportation investments. Opportunities to secure or collect additional revenues for transportation improvements exist with the award of competitive grants and indexing fuel taxes to inflation. The following resources were used to develop the forecasts of existing and potential local funding sources: 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook (December 2020)32 FDOT Inflation Factors (April 24, 2019)33 Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research Local Option Tourist Taxes (December 1, 2020)34 Competitive Grants such as RAISE or INFRA offer the opportunity for the County and regional partners to develop and construct projects of regional and national significance. The highly competitive programs require a local match and strong partnerships, as well as demonstration of established project development through environmental planning, design, and a BCA. Recent emphasis on rural investment may provide opportunities for Monroe County to put forth projects. Index Fuel Taxes refers to indexing local fuel taxes. The State indexes the state gas taxes to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) every January, meaning that prices motorists pay rise in proportion to 31 City of Marathon,Comprehensive Annual Financial Report,FY Ended September 30,2020. https://www.ci.marathon.fl.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/finance/page/3451/2020.09.30_city_of marathon florida financial_statements.pdf 32 2020 Local Government Financial Information Handbook(December 2020),http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/local- government/reports/lgfih20.pdf 33 FDOT Inflation Factors(April 24,2019),https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default- source/planning/pol icy/economic/inflation.pdf 34 Realized and Unrealized Revenues by County:LFY 2010-2021,http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/Iocal- govern m ent/data/data-a-to-z/g-1.cfm 201 inflation, but local fuel taxes are not indexed to inflation. Indexing local fuel taxes to the CPI requires an act of the Florida Legislature. Indexing fuel taxes are important to local governments because it allows revenues to be adjusted as costs for materials and services rise with inflation. Using inflation factors from the Florida Department of Transportation,35 the additional revenues that could be collected on the existing local fuel taxes is projected to be $20.1 million for FY 2021-2040. Tolling: The subject of tolling has been discussed by the Monroe County BOCC several times over the last several years and has again been elevated as a discussion item at the monthly BOCC meetings. Tolling on US 1 has been discussed to help fund infrastructure improvements, assist with sea level rise mitigation, assist law enforcement, alleviate traffic problems, and assist with evacuation reentry. There are existing Federal and state laws that limit which facilities may impose a toll as well as what the toll revenues may be spent on. These federal and state laws would need to be addressed/amended before a toll could be established along US 1. Other potential sources of funding or financing are implemented and used successfully in other locations. Local or state regulations would need to permit some revenue sources, which could include: Developer Fees or Impact Fees are charges expensed to new development within pre-defined geographic areas and can be collected based on metrics such as value, square footage, frontage length, and others. The revenues could be dedicated to specific uses including transportation or utilities. Impact fees and mobility fees are types of developer fees with the one-time fees helping to pay for local transportation improvements that serve the new development. Monroe County estimates collecting $1.4 million in impact fees in FY 2021.31 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a value capture tool used to encourage redevelopment in designated areas. Transportation investments are paid for with the incremental property tax revenues of new development. Millage Property taxes (ad valorem taxes) are made up of a number of local tax rates assessed on real property. Property taxes are a major source of funding for general government. A portion of the Countywide millage rate (in dollars per thousand) is eligible for transportation uses. Special Assessment Districts are created to impose a fee on properties within the assessment area to fund improvements in that area. "FDOT Inflation Factors(April 24,2019),https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default- source/planning/pol icy/economic/inflation.pdf 36 Monroe County,Florida, Adopted Annual Operating&Capital Budget Summary,FY 2021. https://www.monroecounty- fl.gov/DocumentCenterNiew/25750/FY2 I-Adopted-Budget-Summary 202 Public-Private Partnership (PPP or P3) is an organizational structure or agreement between public and private entities. P3s can provide a source of funding to pay the return on investment to the private sector. The benefits of the arrangement include better allocation of risk, faster implementation, and lower costs through private sector innovation. The Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program provides federal credit assistance to eligible highway, transit, intercity rail, and some freight rail, intermodal facilities, and port modification projects. Under TIFIA, states, localities, public authorities, and some private entities can take advantage of three types of financial assistance: secured loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit. Eligible projects include transit-oriented development projects and the capitalization of a rural projects fund within a state infrastructure bank. Other specific requirements must be met including project costs, loan amounts, and project types. TIFIA has a rolling application process, where applicants must submit letters of interest demonstrating creditworthiness and readiness to proceed. After an invitation is received from the TIFIA Joint Program Office, a formal application is required. TIFIA was authorized at $275 million for FYs 2016 and 2017, increasing to $285 million in FY 2018 and $300 million for FYs 2019 and 2020. Commercial Off-Street Parking Fee An additional tax or fee on parking in public and/or commercial spaces could be collected by the County for transportation uses. Airport Car Rental Fees An additional tax or fee on rental car transactions at the Key West International Airport (EYW) or Florida Keys Marathon International Airport (MTH) could be dedicated to transportation uses. However, Section 159 of FAA Reauthorization, which was signed into law in October 2018, prohibits levying any tax on a business at an airport "that is not generally imposed on sales or services by that State, political subdivision, or authority unless wholly utilized for airport or aeronautical purposes." As such, an amendment to the FAA law would be needed to make the funds available to the County. 7.25 Summary of Reasonable Available Funding Table 1 summarizes total transportation-related revenues anticipated to be available through the period FY 2021-2040. According to these estimates, approximately $1.1 billion is expected to be available for transportation needs between FY 2021 and FY 2040. Some or all of the revenues shown in Table 10-1 may be earmarked for specific projects: 203 Table 10-1: Summary of Reasonable Available Existing Funding, FY2021-2040 YOE $Millions Existing:Funding Source ' 2021- 2026- 2031- Total 2021-2040 2025 2030 2040 Constitutional Fuel Tax (2 cents) $9.3 $7.0 $6.9 $23.2 County Fuel Tax (1 cent) $4.1 $3.1 $3.1 $10.3 9th Cent Fuel Tax (1 cent) $2.3 $1.8 $2.3 $6.5 6-Cent 1st Local Option Fuel Tax (6 cents) $3.2 $3.1 $5.7 $12.0 1 to 5 Cents 2nd Local Option Fuel Tax (5 $4.6 $3.7 $4.4 $12.7 cents Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (1%) $103.6 $125.6 $324.1 $553.3 Local Government 1/2 cent sales tax $57.3 $69.5 $179.4 $306.2 Tourist Development and Tourist Impact $34.9 $42.3 $109.1 $186.3 Fee Total Revenues $1,110.5 In addition to the existing funding sources, Table 10-2 summarizes the potential additional funding available for transportation projects over FY 2021-2040. Table 10-2: Summary of Reasonable Available Potential Funding, FY2021-2040 YOE $Millions Potential Funding Sources 2021- 2026- 2031- Total 2021 2025 2030 2040 2040 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with TBD TBD Sustainabilit and Equity RAISE Infrastructure for Rebuilding America TBD TBD INFRA Public Works and Economic Adjustment TBD TBD Assistance Programs Indexing Fuel Taxes to Inflation $1.5 $5.2 $13.4 $20.1 Total Revenues $20.1 7.26 Summary of Potential Funding Sources A summary of the potential funding sources and their typical project types are shown in Table 10-3. Table 10-3: Potential Funding Sources and Project Types by Mode Eligible Funding Sources Eligible Project Type Constitutional Fuel Tax Road / HighwayBridges County Fuel Tax Road / Highway 204 Eligible Funding Sources Eligible Project Type Bridges Bicycle / Pedestrian Bus Other Transit Complete Street/ Multi-modal Road / Highway Bridges Bicycle / Pedestrian 9th Cent Fuel Tax Bus Other Transit Complete Street/ Multi-modal Road / Highway Bridges 6-Cent 1st Local Option Fuel Tax Bicycle / Pedestrian Bus Other Transit Complete Street/ Multi-modal Road / Highway Bicycle / Pedestrian Local Government 1/2 cent sales tax Bus Other Transit Complete Street/ Multi-modal Road / Highway Bicycle / Pedestrian Bus 1-5 cents 2nd Local Option fuel tax Other Transit Complete Street/ Multi-modal Bridges Road / Highway Bicycle / Pedestrian Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (1%) Complete Street/ Multi-modalBridges Bus Other Transit Bicycle / Pedestrian Tourist Development and Tourist Impact Fee Complete Street/ Multi-modal 205 11 Findings and Recommendations Based on the tasks conducted as part of this US 1 TMP, several potential solutions were developed to help improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and accommodate all road users. It should be noted some of the potential solutions have been programmed as projects in the current FDOT Five-year Work Program (see Appendix B) and some others are being evaluated by FDOT and Florida DER As such, only the remaining potential solutions are being shown in Table 11-1. These solutions were categorized into short-term, mid-term, and long-term projects based on projected cost, funding availability, project complexity, need for feasibility studies, inter-governmental agency coordination, right-of- way/utility/environmental impacts, and potential permitting requirements. A complete project list, including project limits, any programmed and/or planned projects, and potential considerations such as right-of-way requirements, permits, agency coordination, etc. is provided in Appendix G. Table 11-1: Potential Solution List Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and 1 Key West marking improvements (including Short-term additional crosswalks) along S. Roosevelt Boulevard from Flagler Avenue to US 1. Conduct a corridor study to evaluate the need for pedestrian signing and 2 Key West lighting enhancements, including Mid-term additional midblock crosswalks along N. Roosevelt Boulevard from Jose Marti Drive to US 1 3 Key West Conduct a signal retiming study to Mid-term optimize signal timing in Key West Conduct a lighting evaluation study at Requires coordination with crosswalks along South Roosevelt stakeholders as well as Florida 5 Key West Boulevard from Flagler Avenue to Mid-term Fish and Wildlife Conservation Bertha Street Commission. .... . Conduct a review to improve 6 Key West pedestrian and bicycle features at the i Mid-term US1/Roosevelt Boulevard intersection 206 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a feasibility study to widen Potential access management 7 Key West sidewalks on the southside of North Mid-term impacts; requires public Roosevelt Blvd involvement Feasibility study to reconfigure the Potential right-of-way impacts. 8 Key West intersection of US-1 and Roosevelt Mid-term Requires coordination with Boulevard stakeholders and public acceptance.... ... Modify signal timing (offsets) along US 20 Stock Island 1 between Roosevelt Boulevard and Short-term Requires Coordination with MacDonald Avenue to help improve FDOT Traffic Operations Office traffic flow. .... . Review and identify potential pedestrian and bicycle signing and 21 Stock Island marking improvements along US 1 Short-term from Roosevelt Boulevard to MacDonald Avenue. Evaluate the need for signing, pavement marking and sight distance 22 Stock Island improvements along the bike lanes in Short-term the vicinity of the Hurricane Hole Marina (near College Road South) Conduct a corridor study to evaluate Requires modifications to the the feasibility of widening US-1 to 6 Monroe County Comp Plan 23 Stock Island lanes and/or intersection Long-term Policies and improvements between Roosevelt widening/reconstruction of the Boulevard and College Road North bridge between Key West and . Stock Island FDOT's Consultant is conducting a feasibility study for Conduct a planning study to evaluate the Key West Intermodal Center the feasibility of a Park-n-Ride Hub, (park-n-ride hub to fixed route circulator, micro transit, accommodate buses, vehicles, 24 Stock Island bike sharing, and/or scooter-sharing Long-term scooters, bicycles, etc.)to be services to provide first/last mile located on Stock Island. Monroe connections to complement public County can coordinate with Key transit West Transit and FDOT regarding this study and the Final Mile Grant. Conduct a study to evaluate the 26 Rockland feasibility of installing an acceleration Mid-term Key lane in the southbound direction at the intersection of US-1 and Calle Uno Conduct a study to evaluate the Potential R/W impacts; may feasibility of relocating the merge area 27 Rockland from the current location on the curve Mid-term require modifications to the Key near Rockland Drive to a straight Monroe County Comp Plan segment of US_1_ Policies 207 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct an access management study to evaluate the need for turn 28 Rockland lanes and/or frontage road Mid-term Potential access impacts; Key requires public involvement improvements along US-1 from Coppitt Road to Boca Chica Road Feasibility study for possible Rockland intersection improvements along US 1 May require modifications to the 29 Key between Saratoga Avenue to Mid-term Monroe County Comp Plan Rockland Drive Policies; potential R/W impacts Conduct a study to determine the Requires modifications to the 30 Rockland need for and feasibility of widening Long-term Monroe County Comp Plan Key US-1 to 4 lanes from Rockland Drive g Policies; potential R/W impacts to Boca Chica Road and bridge widening Conduct a study to evaluate the 31 Rockland feasibility of widening the sidewalk Long-term Potential R/W and Key along the southside of the Boca Chica g environmental impacts Bridge Conduct a review to identify potential Big Coppitt pedestrian/bicycle signing and 35 Key pavement marking improvements Short-term along US 1 from Saratoga Avenue to Boca Chica Road This location is only 0.75mi from Boca Chica Road where a Big Coppitt Conduct a Signal Warrant study at the Signal is also requested. 36 Key intersection of US-1 at 4th Street Mid-term Consider conducting a corridor study so that potential impacts of having both of these signals can be determined This location is only 0.75mi from Conduct a Signal Warrant study at 4th Street where a Signal is also 37 Big Coppitt the intersection of US-1 at Boca Chica Mid-term requested. Consider conducting Key Road a corridor study so that potential impacts of having both of these signals can be determined Lower Refurbish/upgrade bicycle pavement 40 Sugarloaf markings and signing in the vicinity of Short-term Key the Harris Channel Bridge Lower Requires coordination with Conduct a lighting study at US-1 and stakeholders as well as Florida Key 41 Sugarloaf Bay Point Mid-term Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Lower Repair the pedestrian bridge between Requires coordination with 42 Sugarloaf Lower Sugar Loaf and Bay Point Mid-term FDOT Maintenance and Key Structures Offices 208 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Lower Conduct a feasibility study to 43 Sugarloaf determine potential intersection Mid-term Key improvements at US 1 and Sugarloaf Road Conduct a study to determine 51 Cudjoe Key appropriate signs and locations along Short-term the bike lanes near MM 22 Conduct a feasibility study to install Summerland the missing sidewalk between the Boy Potential R/W and 57 Key Scout Camp at Kemp Bridge and Mid-term environmental impacts Caribbean Drive (on the south side of US 1). ----------------------------------- Review and identify potential Big Pine pedestrian and bicycle 61 Key signing/pavement marking Short-term improvements along US 1 in the vicinity of Key Deer Boulevard. Big Pine Conduct a feasibility study for an 62 Key acceleration lane in the southbound I Mid-term Potential environmental impacts direction on US 1 at Ships Way Conduct a feasibility study for IRequires modifications to the 63 Big Pine roadway widening to 4 lanes along US Long-term Monroe County Comp Plan Key 1 from North Pine Channel Bridge to Policies 1 st Street May require modifications to the Conduct a feasibility study to extend Monroe County Comp Plan 64 Big Pine Frontage Road (Avenue A)from Ships Long-term Policies. The extension of this Key Way to Cunningham Lane frontage road could serve adjacent properties and remove traffic from US 1 Conduct a planning study to evaluate Requires coordination with the feasibility of a Park-n-Ride Hub, stakeholders, municipalities, fixed route circulator, micro transit, transit agencies. Land 65 Big Pine bike sharing, and/or scooter-sharing Long-term acquisition may be required for Key services to provide first/last mile a park and ride facility. connections to complement public Coordinate with Key West transit Transit regarding the Final Mile ... Grant Conduct a planning study to Environmental, right-of-way, 66 Big Pine determine the need for and feasibility Long-term and community impacts will Key of a bypass bridge on the south side g require extensive research of Big_Pine and/or coordination 209 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and 77 Marathon pavement marking improvements Short-term along US 1 in the vicinity of the signalized intersections in Marathon. Conduct a turn lane warrant study at Potential R/W and access 78 Marathon the intersection of US-1 and 33rd Short-term impacts ... Street Conduct a feasibility study to add a "NO U-TURN" sign for SB left-turn traffic to reduce conflicts with Short-term Potential access impacts; may 79 Marathon westbound right-turn traffic at the require public involvement intersection of US-1 and Sombrero Beach Road Conduct a feasibility study to restrict 80 Marathon traffic to a "RIGHT TURN ONLY" at Short-term Potential access impacts; the intersection of US-1 and Aviation requires public involvement Boulevard/72nd Street Assess the existing street lighting in 81 Marathon Marathon and implement repairs as Short-term necessary Conduct a study to determine the Potential R/W and access 82 Marathon feasibility of widening bike lanes in Mid-term management impacts; requires Marathon public involvement Conduct an Access Management Potential access impacts; 83 Marathon study along US 1 from 15th Street S. Mid-term requires public involvement to Aviation Boulevard Conduct a study to determine the ' location and need for a traffic signal or 84 Marathon pedestrian crossing on the south end Mid-term of Marathon Coordinate with Miami-Dade Transit requesting a possible extension of Monroe County has started 85 Marathon MDT Route 301 to the south end of Mid-term discussions with MDT regarding Marathon. this FDOT is currently conducting a PD&E study for replacement of the Seven 86 Marathon Mile Bridge. Coordinate with FDOT to Long-term request that pedestrian/bicycle features be added on the new bridge Conduct a feasibility study to widen Requires modifications to 87 Marathon US 1 from 11th Street Ocean to 15th Long-term Monroe County Comp Policies; Street potential access impacts; requires public involvement ... 210 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a planning study to evaluate Requires coordination with the the feasibility of a Park-n-Ride Hub, fixed route circulator, micro transit, stakeholders. Land acquisition 88 Marathon bike sharing, and/or scooter-sharing Long-term may required for a park and services to provide first/last mile ride facility. Coordinate with Key West Transit regarding the Final connections to complement public Mile Grant transit FDOT is evaluating a request for an 102 Islamorada at-grade pedestrian crosswalk at Short-term Founders Park Requires coordination with 103 Islamorada Conduct a lighting study along US 1 in Mid-term stakeholders as well as FPL the vicinity of Founders Park and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Conduct an Access Management Study along US 1 between MM 77 and 83 to determine the need for turn Requires coordination with 104 Islamorada lanes and/or other access Mid-term stakeholders and public management improvements. Also review the possibility of improvements acceptance to the Old Highway to better serve as a frontage road Requires coordination with Conduct a lighting justification study in Mid-term stakeholders as well as FPL 105 Islamorada Upper and Lower Matecumbe and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Conduct a study to determine 106 Islamorada methods to reduce speeding and Mid-term related crashes South of Robbie s Marina (MM 72-MM 73) Conduct a feasibility study to identify potential improvements for SR 4A in Plantation Key, so it can be used as Potential right-of-way impacts. 107 Islamorada an alternate route during peak hours, Long-term Requires coordination with incidents, or during lane closures. stakeholders and public Also, identify improvements at critical acceptance intersections to provide access to/from US 1 Conduct a planning study to evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n-Ride Hub, Requires coordination with the fixed route circulator, micro transit stakeholders. Land acquisition 108 Islamorada bike sharing, and/or scooter-sharing j Long-term may be required for a park and services to provide first/last mile ride facility. Coordinate with Key connections to complement public West Transit regarding the Final transit Mile Grant 211 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct an intersection study to Plantation evaluate the feasibility of improving I I I May require modifications to the 116 Key the transition area (2 to 4 lane Mid-term Monroe County Comp Plan transition) near the intersection of US I Policies 1 and Royal Poinciana Boulevard .. Conduct a study to determine the Requires coordination with 117 Plantation feasibility for installing bike lanes Mid-term stakeholders and public Key along the Old Highway in Islamorada acceptance. Potential right-of- war impacts Conduct a study to determine 118 Plantation appropriate intersection improvements Mid-term Key at the US 1/Seminole Boulevard intersection. Conduct a planning study to Environmental, right-of-way, 182 Upper determine the need for and feasibility Long-term and community impacts will Matecumbe of a bypass bridge between the Snake g require extensive research Creek Bridge and Tea Table. and/or coordination .... . Conduct a study to determine 120 Tavernier appropriate intersection improvements Mid-term at the US 1/Sunshine Boulevard intersection. .... . Evaluate the need for pedestrian 121 Key Largo signage at the US-1 and Ocean Bay Short-term Drive intersection 122 Key Largo Trim trees to improve sight distance Short-term for vehicles on Samson Road Evaluate the need for appropriate 123 Key Largo signage to alert drivers of the Short-term southbound lane drop along US-1 from Sunset Blvd to Buttonwood Drive Conduct a study to determine 124 Key Largo methods to reduce speeding and Short-term related crashes between MM 99 and MM 106 Review and identify potential pedestrian/bicycle signing and pavement marking improvements 125 Key Largo along US 1 in the vicinity of the Ocean Short-term Bay Drive/Atlantic Avenue, Laguna Avenue, Holiday Boulevard and Magnolia Street intersections in Key j ... Largo. 212 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a feasibility study to Potential right-of-way impacts; 126 Key Largo reconfigure the intersection of US-1 at Mid-term requires coordination with Ocean Bay Drive/Atlantic Avenue stakeholders and public acceptance .... . Conduct a safety study for intersection improvements at US-1 and Laguna Review potential relocation of 127 Key Largo Ave (Potentially relocate adjacent Mid-term HAWK north of Laguna Avenue midblock crosswalk to Laguna Avenue) Conduct a study for intersection 128 Key Largo improvements at US-1 and Tarpon Mid-term Basin Drive Conduct an access management Potential access management 129 Key Largo study along US-1 from Andros Road I Mid-term impacts; requires public to Summerland Road acceptance Conduct a study to determine Requires coordination with 130 Key Largo potential intersection improvements at Mid-term stakeholders and public US-1 and CR 905, including bike lane involvement. Potential right-of- continuity through the intersection way impacts Conduct a planning study to evaluate the feasibility of a Park-n-Ride Hub, Requires coordination with the municipalities. Land acquisition fixed route circulator, micro transit, 131 Key Largo bike sharing, and/or scooter-sharing Mid-term may required for a park and services to provide first/last mile ride facility. Coordinate with Key West Transit regarding the Final connections to complement public transit Mile Grant Conduct a feasibility study for signal I I Coordinate with FDOT 132 Key Largo modifications at the intersection of Mid-term I regarding previous US-1 and Woods Avenue studies/findings at this location Conduct a corridor study to determine 133 Key Largo the need for a traffic signal along US 1 Mid-term between Avenue B and Avenue A Conduct a feasibility study for signal 134 Key Largo modifications at the pedestrian signal Mid-term south of the Key Largo Elementary School 213 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Requires coordination with 135 Key Largo Conduct a lighting justification study Mid-term stakeholders as well as FPL on US 1 from MM 103 to MM 106 and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ... Conduct a Sidewalk Feasibility Study I Requires coordination with local 136 Key Largo along Atlantic Avenue from US-1 to Mid-term government agencies Key Largo Community Park Conduct an intersection study at CR North Key 905A and CR 905 to determine 149 Largo appropriate signing and marking Mid-term improvements to enhance visibility Requires coordination with Conduct a lighting study on Bay Point stakeholders as well as Florida 152 Multiple and Big Coppitt Key near bus stops Mid-term Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Coordinate with FDOT D6 on the upcoming deployment of the Conduct a study to assess the future Keys COAST project to review 153 Multiple needs of connected vehicle systems Mid-term the infrastructure being installed in Monroe County through this project and consider this information to develop future needs Requires coordination with Conduct a detailed study to evaluate FDOT and Federal Transit 154 Multiple the feasibility of a water taxi between Mid-term Administration as well as Stock Island and Key West potential private partnerships with local marinas and/or water taxi operators Requires coordination with Conduct a detailed study to evaluate FDOT and Federal Transit 155 Multiple the feasibility of Water Ferry Service Mid-term Administration as well as from Miami to Key West potential private partnerships (i.e. with water ferry operators) Conduct a study to identify gaps in Coordinate with FDOT; potential 156 Multiple ITS coverage (cameras and DMS)for Mid-term R/W impacts incident management purposes Conduct a feasibility study to Requires coordination with 157 Multiple determine locations for Transit Signal Mid-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, Priority. These improvements will help reduce delay to transit vehicles and City of Key West Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of implementing active traffic Requires coordination with 158 Multiple management strategies such as ITS Mid-term Monroe County Sheriffs, Infrastructure, TSM&O Workstations i Emergency operations office, in the Monroe County Sheriffs Office; j and FDOT extend Road Ranger Services into 214 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Monroe, maybe as a pilot program focusing on high crash locations; explore the use of Big Data, Digital Twinning, and/or AI Tools Coordinate with the Monroe County 160 Multiple Sherriffs Department to recruit Mid-term Certified Traffic Homicide Investigators (THI) in Monroe County Conduct a study to evaluate the Coordination with FDOT, Naval feasibility of implementing Aerial Base, Key West Airport, 161 Multiple Mid-term Marathon Airport, FAA and Taxis/Vertiports/eVOTL within Monroe County private air taxi operators; requires public involvement Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of improving bus stop Requires coordination with 162 Multiple amenities such as shelters, Wi-Fi, bike Mid-term FDOT, Key West Transit, and racks, seating, lighting, driver Miami-Dade Transit; potential notification push buttons, etc. along R/W impacts US 1 Conduct an evaluation study to Requires coordination with 163 Multiple prioritize locations that need bus bays. Mid-term FDOT, Key West Transit, and Bus bays for 15 locations are already Miami-Dade Transit; potential funded through FDOT right-of-way impacts Key West Transit is exploring options 164 Multiple for the installation of an Automated Key West Transit Vehicle Location (AVL)system for is Evaluating buses Key West Transit is developing an Key West Transit 165 Multiple enhanced transit app that will provide I is Evaluating additional payment options Conduct a feasibility review to add Requires coordination with 172 Multiple additional bus stops in Long Key and Mid-term Miami-Dade Transit near Angler's Park in Key Largo. Develop a Mobility On-Demand Consider the Key West Transit 166 Multiple Application to assist users with trip planning and mobility options along Long-term application and AVL system as US 1 part of this study Evaluate the feasibility of _ implementing Automated Buses. Conduct a Roadway Readiness Requires coordination with 167 Multiple Analysis Study to identify Long-term transit agencies and public infrastructure and system needs to support automated buses. Two acceptance potential areas: Stock Island to Marathon or the proposed connector 215 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information between the Mobility Hub and Key West Coordinate with FDOT for the 168 Multiple implementation of Electric Vehicle Long-term Infrastructure (Charging stations, Smart Power Lane) along US 1 Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of providing aerial gondolas Requires coordination with at locations with high percentages of I stakeholders and public 169 Multiple short trips (less than 3 miles). Long-term involvement. Land acquisition Potential locations could include may be needed for transfer Islamorada, Stock Island, and Key stations and support structures West Conduct a study to determine the locations for and feasibility of implementing Queue Jumpers at Requires coordination with 170 Multiple Long-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, signalized intersection along US 1. These improvements will help reduce and City of Key West delay to transit vehicles Conduct a feasibility study to provide a new bridge between Stock Island Right-of-way, Environmental 171 Multiple and Key West (two potential options: Long-term and Community Impacts will 5th Avenue to Douglas Circle or require extensive research Projected 13th Avenue to Thompson and/or coordination Island) The City of Key West proposed a I This is one of the proposed 173 Multiple modified Lower Keys Shuttle to end at Long-term improvements in the Key West the new Key West Intermodal Center Transit Development Plan (2019) --------------------- The City of Key West proposed a new This is one of the proposed Key West Intermodal Center Transit improvements in the Key West 174 Multiple Connector that will provide service Long-term Transit Development Plan from the Intermodal Center to (2019) downtown Key West Conduct a feasibility study to Requires coordination with 175 Multiple determine locations for Part-Time Long-term FDOT, Miami-Dade Transit, and Shoulder Use by buses along US 1 Key West Transit Evaluate the feasibility of unifying multi-agency transit system (KWT& Will require extensive 176 Multiple MDT) with a service operated by a Long-term coordination and interagency single provider agreements Evaluate parking facilities and determine possibilities to provide additional public parking. Consider a Requires coordination with the 177 Multiple Parking Management System to Long-term City of Key West; potential R/W manage parking and provide real-time impacts information to users regarding parking j ... availability 216 Ref# Key Project Description Implementation Additional Schedule Comments/Information Conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of extending the current Microwave Backbone into Key West. Requires coordination with 178 Multiple Currently the traffic signals in Key Long-term FDOT and City of Key West West are connected via cellular and the Microwave back bone ends on Stock Island Conduct a warrant study for Requires coordination with 179 Multiple pedestrian bridges over US-1 at Long-term FDOT and Monroe County school crossings (Coral Shores Hight School Board; requires public School was specifically mentioned) involvement 217 APPENDIX A — Transit Route Maps Eli ED 'Y" ED t7 LLI MJ Ln i!e mil 60 4 2 ®a Cs ±Y 4`d S Y of 9 4 ,S z sus. z M .:.4 r1 tj k<t r}k Ln e F�- v x' �5 w , 6- i r 0 LLI J �u• F LLI r Y LLI 0 � r ° s.Y vY "a 3 H, rz z: "6,2) a; ico t NV um; r tom': G1 ,.o'.0 am U E G cd r res c S�iv ✓� lll T x� { `" P �h �x Sf: a O J c, J u J U I it s Ex tt` ' w' y rn tl 1 xyy w U, a 0 S V'ft .•, ;•j iJ iTJ � x U SW 328 St/Lucy St (SE 8 St) 301 0 SW 344 St ow Q Park& DADE E C° Ride Lot O, T EXPRESS Zch SW 344 St/W Palm Dr Florida u) City m Trip ends and begins at Tom Thumb Store Tom Thumb Store 5°��♦♦ a\ �P' �Go�G��N Turn on 1 St Key Largo Mile Marker 98 LI after North Dr The Rain a „North Dr Barrel Q' E. Ridge Rd 5� Treasure Village Tavernie/Mile � arker 87 Islamorada Mile Marker 74 Gulf View Dr Gas S'0 Station ■ Marathon B� gib,. N White Marlin Blvd Mile Marker 50.E ;�h,4q *Publix MAP NOT TO SCALE J♦ 06/2015 w%vw.m1amidade.qov/transit DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIB WORKS INF:RMA:rION INFORMACION.ENFOMASYf..N 1 1.MDADE r%t�oMia flDade M MET TRACKER I EASY PAY MIA MI I MDT TRANSIT WATCH 11 )3t�E 468'5590 )TEE: 05,468,54O APPENDIX B — Programmed and Planned Project Summaries FDOT Work Program Project List FDOT Five-Year Work Program Project Summary Item Number Type of Work Description Category Name Phase Name 2505488 WIDEN/RESURFACE EXIST LANES SR A1A/S.ROOSEVELT FROM BERTHA STREET Highways Construction TO END OF SMATHERS BEACH 252228 1 PLANNING MODELS/DATA UPDATE MONROE COUNTY LONG RANGE TRANSPORT Transportation Planning Planning PLAN 2522282 PLANNING MODELS/DATA UPDATE MONROE COUNTY LONG RANGE Transportation Planning Planning TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2522283 PLANNING MODELS/DATA UPDATE MONROE COUNTY LONG RANGE Transportation Planning Planning TRANSPORTATION PLAN 410734 1 AVIATION REVENUE/OPERATIONAL MONROE CO.AIRPORTS AIRPORT Aviation Capital IMPROVEMENTS DDR&DPTO CONTINGENCY 4137212 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR 5/OLD 7 MI BRIDGE FROM KNIGHTS KEY TO Highways Construction PIGEON KEY 414545 1 FERRY BOAT/WATER TAXI OLD 7-MILE BRIDGE WATER TAXI/FERRY Highways Construction SERVICE CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT:LOWER KEYS 4151737 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE SHUTTLE BUS SERVICE Transit Operations 4346844 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PUSHBUTTON Highways Construction CONSTRUCTION IN MONROE COUNTY 4346845 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PUSHBUTTON Highways Construction CONSTRUCTION IN MONROE COUNTY 4346846 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PUSHBUTTON Highways Construction CONSTRUCTION IN MONROE COUNTY 4346847 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PUSHBUTTON Highways Construction CONSTRUCTION IN MONROE COUNTY CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-FTA SECTION 5311 Freight Logistics And 4348963 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE OPERATING ASSISTANCE Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-FTA SECTION 5311 Freight Logistics And 4348964 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE OPERATING ASSISTANCE Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-FTA SECTION 5311 Freight Logistics And 4348965 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE OPERATING ASSISTANCE Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-FTA SECTION 5311 Freight Logistics And 4348966 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE OPERATING ASSISTANCE Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-FTA SECTION 5311 Freight Logistics And 4348967 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE OPERATING ASSISTANCE Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit 4355111 WAYSIDE PARK MONROE COUNTY LOWER KEYS SCENIC Miscellaneous Construction HIGHWAY VIEWING AREA CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-STATE TRANSIT Freight Logistics And 4367023 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE BLOCK GRANT Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-STATE TRANSIT Freight Logistics And 4367024 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE BLOCK GRANT Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-STATE TRANSIT Freight Logistics And 4367025 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE BLOCK GRANT Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-STATE TRANSIT Freight Logistics And 4367026 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE BLOCK GRANT Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit FDOT Five-Year Work Program Project Summary Item Number Type of Work Description Category Name Phase Name CITY OF KEY WEST-DOT-STATE TRANSIT Freight Logistics And 4367027 OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE BLOCK GRANT Passenger Operations Operations Program:Transit FL KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT ESSENTIAL Freight Logistics And 4386642 AVIATION REVENUE/OPERATIONAL AIRPORT EQUIPMENT Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation KEY WEST INT'LAIRPORT ESSENTIAL AIRPORT Freight Logistics And 4386662 AVIATION REVENUE/OPERATIONAL EQUIPMENT Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation FL KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT Freight Logistics And 4386802 AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation Freight Logistics And 4392852 PTO STUDIES KEY WEST INT'L AIRPORT PLANNING STUDIES Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT Freight Logistics And 4392862 PTO STUDIES PLANNING STUDIES Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation 4409092 BIKE PATH/TRAIL SR 5/US 1 FROM UPPER SUGARLOAF KEY TO Highways Construction LOWER SUGARLOAF KEY FL KEYS MARATHON INT'LAIRPORT BUILDING Freight Logistics And 4413632 AVIATION SECURITY PROJECT AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation KEY WEST INT'LAIRPORT BUILDING AND Freight Logistics And 4413832 AVIATION SECURITY PROJECT SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation 4417451 BIKE PATH/TRAIL FLORIDA KEYS HERITAGE TRAIL CONNECTION Miscellaneous Construction AT CUDJOE GARDENS 4419641 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR 5/US 1 LONG KEY BRIDGE OVER LONG KEY Highways Construction CHANNEL(BRIDGE 900094) 4419681 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY LIGNUMVITAE CHANNEL Highways Construction OVER LIGNUMVITAE CHANNEL(900096) 4419741 TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENT SR 5/US 1/OVERSEAS HWY AT BURTON DR Highways Construction INTERSECTION KEY WEST INT'L AIRPORT AIRFIELD Freight Logistics And 4424191 AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation FL KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT AIRFIELD Freight Logistics And 4424211 AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation 4426701 PD&E/EMO STUDY SNAKE CREEK BRIDGE FEASIBILITY STUDY Highways PD&E 4426702 PD&E/EMO STUDY SNAKE CREEK BRIDGE PD&E STUDY Highways PD&E 4431822 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCT. SR-5/US-1 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY FROM MM Highways Construction 74.489 TO 74.571 4438651 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION BIG PINE KEY KOEHAN SUBDIVISON RDS Miscellaneous Construction RESURFACE/REHABILITATE/RECONSTRUCT 4438921 RESURFACING SR 5/WHITEHEAD STREET FROM FLEMING Highways Construction STREET TO WEST OF TRUMAN AVENUE 443893 1 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.FROM S OF TOLLGATE Highways Construction BLVD TO LIGNUMVITAE CHANNEL 4438932 TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENT SR 5/US-1/OVERSEAS HWY FROM MM 70.00 Highways Construction TO 80.00 4438951 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.FROM MM 32.98 TO Highways Construction MM 36.57 FDOT Five-Year Work Program Project Summary Item Number Type of Work Description Category Name Phase Name 4438971 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.FROM MM 31.4TO MM Highways Construction 32.5 4438981 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.FROM MM 19.4TO 19.8 Highways Construction AND M M 20.6 TO 23.1 4439001 IPAVEMENT ONLY RESURFACE(FLEX) SR 5 FRONTAGE ROAD AT BOCA CHICA KEY Highways Construction 4439201 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.FROM MM 26.2 TO MM Highways Construction 27.4 4439211 RESURFACING SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY.NORTHBOUND FROM Highways Construction MM 97.0 TO MM 100.0 4441241 FUNDING ACTION D/W CONTINGENCY FOR SMALL COUNTY Highways Construction OUTREACH PROGRAM KEY WEST TRANSIT-FTA SECTION 5324 Freight Logistics And 4443341 CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE EMERGENCY RELIEF(HURRICANE IRMA) Passenger Operations Capital Program:Transit PORT OF KEY WEST-T-PIER EXTENSION AND Freight Logistics And 4444471 SEAPORT CAPACITY PROJECT MANOPOLE INSTALLATION Passenger Operations Capital Program:Seaport 4444901 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DISTRICTWIDE RIGHT OF WAY MAP UPDATES Miscellaneous Preliminary AND DEVELOPMENT Engineering 4449201 TRAFFIC SIGNALS SR 5/US 1 FL KEYS CONNECTED VEHICLES Highways Design Build PILOT PROJECT Bridge/Roadway/ 4456091 BRIDGE OPERATIONS STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS-MONROE COUNTY Maintenance Contract Maintenance Bridge/Roadway/ 4456092 BRIDGE OPERATIONS STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS-MONROE COUNTY Maintenance Contract Maintenance Bridge/Roadway/ 4456093 BRIDGE OPERATIONS STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS-MONROE COUNTY Maintenance Contract Maintenance 4460051 RESURFACING SR 5/US-1/OVERSEAS HIGHWAY FROM MM Highways Construction 108.4 TO M M 112.8 4460071 RESURFACING-RIDE ONLY SR A1A/S ROOSEVELT BLVD FROM GO TO Highways Construction LANE TO N OF ROOSEVELT BLVD 4460111 RESURFACING SR5/US-1/N ROOSEVELT BLVD FROM Highways Construction EISENHOWER DR TO S ROOSEVELT 4461261 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CITY OF KEY WEST-FINAL MILE MODE SHIFT Miscellaneous Construction BIKE FACILITIES FOR BUS RTS 4461781 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1 OVERSEAS HWY OVER NORTH HARRIS Highways Construction CHANNEL BRIDGE#900109 4461841 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR 5/US-1 OVERSEAS HWY OVER TORCH KEY Highways Construction CHANNEL-BRIDGE#900113 4461861 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1 OVERSEAS HWY OVER SPANISH Highways Construction HARBOR CHANNEL-BRIDGE#900106 4461871 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1 OVERSEAS HWY OVER OHIO- Highways Construction MISSOURI CHANNEL-BRIDGE#900104 4461911 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1-OVERSEAS HWY OVER TEA TABLE Highways Construction RELIEF-BRIDGE#900088 4461921 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1 OVERSEAS HWY OVER BAHIA HONDA Highways Preliminary CHANNEL-BRIDGE 900016&900045 Engineering 4462311 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR5/US1 OVERSEAS HWY SEVEN MILE BRIDGE Highways Preliminary OVER MOSER CHANNEL-BR#900101 Engineering Freight Logistics And 446325 1 MODAL SYSTEMS PLANNING MONROE COUNTY FREIGHT PLAN STUDY Passenger Operations PD&E Program:Multimodal SR-5/OVERSEAS HWY OVER OHIO BAHIA Preliminary 4477531 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION Highways HONDA CHANNEL BRIDGE 900105 Engineering FDOT Five-Year Work Program Project Summary Item Number Type of Work Description Category Name Phase Name 4477541 BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION SR 5/OVERSEAS HWY OVER NORTH PINE Highways Preliminary CHANNEL BRIDGE 900110 Engineering 4477691 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CARD SOUND ROAD ATTUBBYS CREEK BRIDGE Highways Construction #904982 4477701 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CARD SOUND ROAD AT MOSQUITO CREEK Highways Construction BRIDGE#904984 4478061 RESURFACING SR 5/US-1/OVERSEAS HIGHWAY FROM MM Highways Construction 36.6 TO MM 38.4 SR 5/US-1/OVERSEAS HWY FROM MM 87.16 4478101 RESURFACING Highways Construction TO MM 90.02(PLANTATION KEY) FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT Freight Logistics And 447893 1 AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT TERMINAL REHAB AND SECURITY LIGHTING Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation KEY WEST INT'L AIRPORT TERMINAL Freight Logistics And 4479111 AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT CONCOURSE A Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT- Freight Logistics And 4479781 AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT AIRCRAFT OVERFLOW PARKING Passenger Operations Capital Program:Aviation MARATHON OFFICE BUILDING-EXTERIOR Bridge/Roadway/ 448253 1 FIXED CAPITAL OUTLAY PAINTING AND CLEANING Maintenance Contract FDEP Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Improvement Summary Table 7. Existing U.S. Highway 1/ Historic Bridge Conditions along the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Corridor Separated Bike Lane Channel Name Existing Bridge Span Trail Status on Pedestrian Markings on Short-term Condition Length Bridge Facilities on Bridge Shoulder Design Recommendations Brid e Marvin D.Adams Open; None; Install physical markers between bike Waterway 4 Lanes; 120 ft Incomplete; separate trail None lane and travel lane; Install signage MM 103.6 Separated Open to trail users bridge to north cautioning trail users that the trail merges with the bridge shoulder Open; Install physical markers between bike Tavernier Creek 4 Lanes; 320 ft Yes Yes Complete; lane and travel lane; Install signage MM 91 Open to trail users cautioning trail users that the trail Separated merges with the bridge shoulder Bike Lane leads Install physical markers between bike Open; to bridge Snake Creek Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install signage 2 Lanes; 860 ft None shoulder; No bike MM 86 Draw Bridge Open to trail users lane markings on cautioning trail users that the trail bridge merges with the bridge shoulder Bike Lane leads Install physical markers between bike Whale Harbor Channel Open; Incomplete; to bridge lane and travel lane; Install signage MM 84 2 Lanes 680 ft Open to trail users None shoulder; No bike cautioning trail users that the trail lane markings on merges with the bridge shoulder bridge Separated trail Install physical markers between bike Tea T "Reli f .' leads to bridge Open; Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install signage Channel 280 ft None shoulder; No bike Rp 2 Lanes Open to trail users lane markings on cautioning trail users that the trail bridge merges with the bridge shoulder Separated trail Install physical markers between bike Tea Table ICey leads to bridge Open; Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install signage Channel 735 ft None shoulder; No bike Open to trail users 2 Lanes cautioning trail users that the trail lane markings on bridge merges with the bridge shoulder Install physical markers between bike tniJian Key Cliainr►el Open; Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install signage 2,040 ft None None MM 78 rs cautioning trail users that the trail '_ merges with the bridge shoulder Separated trail Install physical markers between bike leads to bridge Ligri�mvitaC�ianhel Open; Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install signage MM. B 2 Lanes 900 ft Open to trail users None shoulder;No bike cautioning trail users that the trail lane markings on merges with the bridge shoulder bridge New Open; 2 Lanes 1,890 ft Trail on historic None None None;Trail on adjacent historic bridg Channel Two Bridge bridge MM 73 Historic Complete; Open Bridge Open 1,890 ft to trail users N/A N/A None; Complete Bike lane Install physical markers between bike New Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install signage Bridge Open; 2 Lanes 4,920 ft to trail users None markings lead to cautioning trail users that the trail CharinOl Five bridge shoulder merges with the bridge shoulder Open; Navigational Break; Historic Trail to merge Improve fishing pier and scenic overlo N Bridge Scenic overlook and 4,920 ft N/A N/A � ge fishin ier with US1 bridge off of Craig Key Long Key; New Open; 2 Lanes 2.3 mi Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic bridg Channel Bridge bridge Historic Complete; Open MM 65 Bridge Open 2.3 mi to trail users N/A N/A None; Complete Tom's New Open; 2 Lanes 1,340 ft Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic bridg _Harbor Cut Bridge bridge Historic Complete; Open MM 62 Bridge Open 1,340 ft to trail users N/A N/A None; Complete Tom's New Open; 2 Lanes 1,520 ft Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic bridg Harbor< Bridge bridge Channel Historic 520 ft Complete; Open MM 61 Bridge Open 1, to trail users N/A N/A None; Complete Vaca Cut Complete; Open MM 53 Open; 4 lanes; Separated 410 ft to trail users Yes None None; Complete Install physical markers between bike New Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install signage Bridge Open; 2 lanes 6.78 mi to trail users No No cautioning trail users that the trail Table 7. Existing U.S. Highway 1 / Historic Bridge Conditions along the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Corridor Separated Bike Lane Channel Name Existing Bridge Span Trail Status on Pedestrian Markings on Short-term Condition Length Bridge Facilities on Bridge Shoulder Design Recommendations Bridge New Open; 930 ft Incomplete; Open None Yes None; Trail on adjacent historic b South Pine —Bridge 2 lanes to trail users Channel Historic Incomplete; MM 29 Bridge Closed 930 ft Closed to trail N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Repair brid users Install physical markers between Torch'Channel Open; 2 lanes 820 ft None Yes Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install sign MM 28 to trail users cautioning trail users that the t merges with the bridge shouldi Torch Ramrod Install physical markers between Channel Open; 2 lanes 650 ft Incomplete; Open None Yes lane and travel lane; Install sign MM 28 to trail users cautioning trail users that the t merges with the bridge shouldi Install physical markers between New Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install sign Niles Bridge Open; 2 lanes 4,550 ft to trail users None None cautioning trail users that the t Ghanni merges with the bridge shouldi MM'2i"= Navigational Historic Closed 4,550 ft Break; Designated N/A N/A Improve fishing pier and scenic ovi Bridge fishing pier and scenic overlook New Open; 2 lanes 1,110 ft Incomplete; Open None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b Kemp Bridge to trail users Channel Historic Incomplete; MM 24 Bridge Closed 1,110 ft Closed to trail N/A N/A Repair bridge; Finish trail users New Open; 2 lanes 1,480 ft Incomplete; Open None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b Bow Channel,, Bridge to trail users MM 20 Historic Incomplete; Open Open 1,480 ft N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bridge to trail users New Open; 2 lanes 820 ft Incomplete; Open None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b Park Channel Bridge to trail users MM 19 Historic Incomplete; Open Brid a Open; No Facilities 820 ft to trail users N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bike lane Install physical markers between North Harris Channel Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install sign MM 18 Open; 2 lanes 440 ft to trail users None markings lead to cautioning trail users that the t bridge shoulder merges with the bridge shouldi Bike lane Install physical markers between Harris Gap Channel Incomplete; Open lane and travel lane; Install sign MM 18 Open; 2 lanes 110 ft to trail users None markings lead to cautioning trail users that the t bridge shoulder merges with the bridge shouldi Bike lane Install physical markers between Harris Channel Incomplete; lane and travel lane; Install sign MM 17 Open; 2 lanes 440 ft Open to trail users None markings lead to bridge shoulder cautioning trail users that the t merges with the bridge shouldi Lower New Trail on historic N Sugarloaf Bridge Open; 2 lanes 1,290 ft bride None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b to Channel Historic Incomplete; MM_1S_____ Bridge Closed 1,290 ft Closed N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Saddlebunch New Open; 2 lanes 630 ft Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b #2 Channel Bridge bridge MM 15 Historic Open 630 ft Incomplete; Open N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bridge New Trail on historic Bike lane Saddlebunch Open; 2 lanes 740 ft None None; Trail on adjacent historic b #3 Channel Bridge bridge markings lead to MM 14 Historic Open 740 ft Incomplete; Open N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bridge Saddlebunch New Open; 2 lanes 880 ft Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b #4 Channel Bridge bridge MM 13 Historic Open 880 ft Incomplete; Open N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bridge Saddlebunch' New Open; 2 lanes 880 ft Trail on historic None None None; Trail on adjacent historic b #5 Channel ", Bridge bridge MM 13 Historic Open 880 ft Incomplete; Open N/A N/A Remove cantilevers; Finish Trz Bridge a 3 o rL+' O T O +°+ C 4; c Y O n a a C v Y a W W W + Y ate+ V v o g c o 1 a) Y o o o Q p p a o Vl U4� ,,, o f ,� m U T c v T co �. �. �- >, O- c �, O I I C a) Y ro � Y N 0) O (p m o >, 1 - a O v v i; o v v a' v Y Ln � t t Y U v �. aJ i W LL• 0) 0) O C O E O >. v i >_ Y j C O O O i O C IM ro T Y o, m p �- o a o L + o v v o o z z cn ro m z Y v v � O m m i E E 7 7 � -O p_ OL L V (J I I I L 1 I L Y O m c 1 L _ _ v �, M U p c a a a v v m a ate, 0 L � v v a.+ N I I U U d �O a) m I m m = T L O L d O C C a) = I I v I I I I ` OL 'O "d 'O aJ ;d t E � m U ro ro U v v m 01 O v v v v C c c c m c c � � m ,o °' o L L o a a rn s a 6 o m m m o m m •� G1 U1 C Y J L -O r6 2 U U Ln C .L .0 i C O -O � �. M Ln L v v F i 1 v o can o 0 0 E m m m m m m m m` * � # # # 00 c c O N v 2 L L L v v > ,, U m a c ro L L j c c v rY ro u u u c t t c 6 a o ro o o ra 3 c c c c o c C C c L a c c c c U U O r/1 C 2 2 2 ,..+ (n r6 (O C C C c v a-, C C C r6 O C i C L O � L L 9 (O m m f6 C CO m m r1 L co m ro = L L L v v U U L L L L 3 U c c F v �, v m 0 U, m c U U U U U U o a° a m C C C d O- O- >- Y 1 c to E .E '° ° m m ra T a—�i E E T o o ra u u U 1� O O c`� (a !a V) Y [o •z z Y Y m oS cS a CL M cn cn m a0 a0' �64 l 4° s4�ys°q�aaN z r z z z r z z � r z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 6 a�i8 �4tsa� �a4a a'�aM v ys ■ m ■ ■ ■ m ■ m ■ ■ m m ■ ■ ■ m _Yw O O M +--i N N l0 O� N l0 L11 N l0 Lll I� N N Lf] N l0 M O O O O O � � � ,� � � � M �p O I� N I� •--� O 01 I� n Ln N .--i .--i O O Lr1 H Y LU W R � O i LL G1 cB L W IM a v a m afo N m Cl) W _$ cn a 4 p _ p Lu a C \ r0 ,� .� i W OW t a W W p CaLi EL_ � u C �� v C Y Q �W Y W ` N C O m m N CO a L v n p Y i ++ L L R ` T u ` Y > u� F y o o a U E a a W T v u y u a U o Ln v — � .� p p v Y O v u Ln 0 o C v a 0) u O U L E C _ ° 00 U ° .� r N N Y '� CO O ate+ V I I •N R = = v U a U U p a0i ` O� -� Y Y J U J � v v 9 O U N Ql -C O v }' (J ° N N a 6� � +� �. W 1 1 I 1 -O 'O 4 y rn u a o ra o r_^ ra E c 3 rn ro p v v c .L 'G m _ _ i s i C _ j w pp c �o ro m o _ _ v v m m v fC J d = T C O o O O N a uv 00 J U U ii O O Fz tY C �. .L, I I I I v i m m L C C v i .0 `p U fC > Y Ln o a * E a - 1 a ti n (n ro n m rn 0) � c rl F O T a _ _ a ZI ` :a p ;a a v v c c E i E .� a u LL v — L L L L U 1� C O U U U U L >_ L > L — L m CO CO m r6 ai rip tl U C to d p LL N N Ln Lo (n U U O O O O N L -a �j C Q O a., O i Y O v # # # # O N 'C c Ol d r0 Y L O v m T T T m m m m O Ln rn ru �, 2 v �` v Y aJ U7 U7 2 M 2 2 � ` v o + c c c c c c Y Y Y ~ o) v aci T w c c aa)fu ° ra rca rco co rco a r0 L O O 'i QJ W 7 r0 O O L r, L -6 C L L L L ro O O O O O O O O LL Y C� V) 2 LL LL 2 J Q U U U U J J J J °yF m E s S. .� a GJ t i O bo ,� ,,,�`., w a s v L O O ( � r 4. 4+ ��+ r^ 0 'k m to a Cii Q ul LM Igo L r t � t � t rFo. t I �E f J) f t L ^�^ U aj 4i i U W i CL L 4co y � O cs/1 n- N m �" O Q L o ++ J fn cu co CL v 0' CD E Q Y 0) X m 0 rn z3 73 0 p O c o a° Y L m i I � m Ln Ea V OJ i Lncu OJ Qj LA 2� > a a, — Y a `. ao w+ cn cn' L' cn L co L -� U) 70 76 co co 2E O Q + Co 2 Z +� Ile O �.. >1 (a CD O) N = a �.+ � C N _ L3 x m � (l cn Q -0 m O ci3 = U ! R3 N �. . L co � c' 0 O CO. Q 0 T 0 u) O N x Q 2t _ to i r` GJ CJ 4J � a a v c m v �,. E J � y tu L L vuv N W V ++ p C d i.a a m 0 i I.`LL 0 +U k L a � a Y � L" u cu « p a v +� N O O a � Y V' i m o°1c m a a, °° a z o fz i � z \\ J y 4 r. O Q i U) cn © (6 1 2: -0 � co E a O C N Q co CD m -0 } *- -0 N O N = N O (n c6 c O U) �-+ O O l _ f� ,r O , p a) Q D C O (/)! O W Q o- r#� y per i m a Its C._� O Cj a, Lac a a a� Y m � U tu O OG p u1 @ 03 ww 4J Q �:. i �, � O a yCL - k d t i m W E 41 " Cis t 3 L � U ° Un W 611, `e to C a i Y w tu O O J L 011 fU t 4J L � tu N u m i N m m cu (nk C: 4J 4J dA © O O W O N m C Y Y Q +:• cn •.. kuj cu a tu m Z3 v U cn R5 ca m Ln co c°� w kN,�E m V O Y Ln i C VD • $ Y U d O V i+ Y Ts U O O •�^ O1 O i - c 4 0 u u can � a v t a v •i Q � m � m 3 n i Y U W V O u C co = O t,_vCOO Lilt LA Q CC 4J LA e tM O OL Y cC G 4- LV qu i a 3 O W Co 4-11 O Y m U � i C cn cn rn m H 2 i (6 H N CO fi (6 G NiE O r:j'w H cm tD a N _0 C T3 i GJ p (6 = U fnLn D c o x o a � LL' 1- LL a Gib •�' 1 ��� �'' c � c 0 a� {i s ma H Y i fC a v am V LA Z Y T- M u, �.+ •y i CM k ..: m ' 2 � i � F 00 Lf1 of 0 L v a1 av+ 4J M OLn Y ° co cu Ln O Y s •L ns � _OJ U. U w^. cm L (n r •� L V v c `o76a a 2Ecc _ m O p � Z ia � n c �.. � Uj w a E � a ° a cu � E < � - a_' x m <� ' C o p N O c O f/) O ?C O v �4 a t � s\ Y U ra 3 }� QJ PL ,§ Qj i (p ty U_ c ttc a c cu (9 tic i a n ad i m a1 dA m M m L GJ Y s C o� ' �O •y w� V.�y ta� ��E V pk. 5, u^SY vl" N ° m m M v CL3 cD Y Oi, ° a L v 0 VIJ s,4 tits! i 17 C) 4 t � aj W Wss W tu € LA 2LA. Fil m Y �fitli r{s: L s as i N CD m � 1 Y � �s ��� rt1 t trf t fs t +m L V 0 N t is i r 'i ca 3 a tm i i o co y +� ' t .H r ,, F 2 N 4 i •3 c a a m t, CD m W s's LO v p rtu •O t 4 t „ r tt trtt tt r0m auU- t t, L V G1 la co E rt t g$ N Ln sse Y 95. it ( >Si' Pi GJTo 0 rt! ro O LOV� S / it T Ln Ln li t � t Y CU low. Z tu Co W C a 'a W, u E ou ,t Y rn LW Y CV •y � .� m C r tu allin U i CC cu w W CJ U- c m m m us p z a U I- M w, m s,S s�st 17 � fU J,; tu ss � . ca �� f0 tj ifit'vi rs s;t s�t2 -y Lfi M co rsr + Lq 3 0 T t CU 1 H +' N Z W N 4- o a = _ fa o , H m ink fr"a V W i 16 �w Y QJ „a1 m ,E u�� a� 01 .y m W O r 41. r_ fC N fC fC M M -n ._ ._ m f0 fC =a, fd V m an n d U aj le _ a Z. a O m k t r m OC W CAC � H cu O co G1 g 6 rM2 L H Ln SR �tr s�,t , tt Qj IS, t ' �4 1 t } � i } Amoy a �} s?fi } ,- l, t s U amp t �,� ttIt 051 cu SIT! t Lf) cu GJ CU CU MW VA l U 4�i V1 OC i O 3 \ C dA ED v v i O O i > 03 M N Y OG L4d V1 APPENDIX C —Monroe County Elevation Maps �� �r�6tti�Ag,t i s tM 't4skr r 4t�1)l 1tV tar m iy r r P - osdss LL m q- 1 a01, yy N m G Vf + Q 1 1 {II55 ^ ^L t � t 1 rft r tY tj�,ipi ,t tj st to ' CD lY 1k f y AW, ' N Q d � + U) 3'' ✓ )s ki h )�r"t"` � -ar,4 IN CI) )?ti j �t i r i II t t i 5 �Sl �i 7W �t 'her fl LO t uW� T stl'� C W CN CD 4) t 9n 0 O s` O oo }4i M o00 d � C w �t rn J 0 LL t, Vi A ax Qw � z z �(i r�� � ids � a YY.� try 5tfrtft tp ip- {+ 1{,i k r K�a 4�1 }tr i £t ? �t�titt£trttn r}4f Ii f i y ltyW"" I�r t} �'t ,�kfkittit��� 'V ,"r �I 'k LL m 1 } 1 L L.L N � i li. t s Y 'lf;G�`. y s�a� I kn l,y li Sty a 9 o-rs s Y lr O � r— C 1 fs4Y t}bb+ ,t `4 Altt t exYn t'tr sty, i£tkt!3?lri{ri r(i?i'a+ -?`' v£ ID (D (� 1 r i f stts � S�ss"?ftf r -c ti 4i�l�Y_ ty?s i� �s??£Itai� 6 t Y-7`d,,5' "! € N wig" tt3 it1 tY4Y t� f; 1 V A (k �,- svY�i3tY +se 4 ! � r anv�4n t c i J IMI IiAl f � 2 t kZ u7 '�nx,AN „ t f o M oo O CO co co, co 4 t py a O IY l } 1 �* 4 q W ;l aty ylws r Et Pf,„s w, t itk`Vr }� 1 Me ly t%gwg' JY Of1 "k,1 0 "rl Ty �£ }f{t �. LL 70 M. m m -my 04 d AA 1 i 1 S' /\ � s �� ar r t47y i V 'Irv. a lo WRTI, N A �irso ' , wa a rl{t 4 t+ �4, ra,Is 4cn A, 4� li �? e W — r.r y;<,'�q k tr�£s���'g•v.��'�.a} ° \r�r �'���£�'1V�(t�!}jfit'}ft t�tt t `��, ��'��, _ � �`,# ��,�� � r+1�K�.�, @ Egg, N ,AS�'p�l` t �`•w�Sr�Ji���yy��� ��';���f r �'£ ��S���I �� ��"vLst�� �5�, � o �t}nrtti,��r�iF i bs 1 cSly r1 1 lt!}71t± 3 �t"sa?Y;; 1 's r SJr s> sp s N '- ar °o m r nl��J4r��t dt 2� i rN O CO W °o W 0) ' 10 37 0 r � 1�lir�� 1C��'�rSti= `` �3t � ,S£ � �£rt�t�P} i� st� r �� � N •� d2s, 0 s}`` J 0 LL y r i 1 - s (Y, t 11 ����{iy+ 1���3 `�t£ �_ sir �"�t ' *� sar`• sr �t - �`•:� ,;r` '�S7i`�s� ,�` W 1 n "r }a a rpC 'apt `mil-s r Kx Sa: t'}tl �a� `J ; d ai a T4 ����� } �`r3J1zS}���t fh� i ,my, ,1i-� !i ��?3}rSTs��� a �t 4 �S rs7; r q LL m � � T 16 � sl,flit s{Sfl` tS=; �� ..s{ Y,i�,�1Tmi=. t�S hrp�i,sf't>u! ty, i }>!§���i cr � r �} O y s 1 Y i f si ` f 14 lye"i��1G�,. H 4 �& 1 •W �/� t11 .. 4.+ � s va r },1 Y i� , lJ21�1} ftkf s ���{s 1� r {h; t 1 ^ s jtr�a �Y�}�At c 4p 115}ti S}� !\t sr Ss f{ S} `,�; Z �f GD � Y CD v' � � � 3 � u t ss ! f s ', � �! 4�,� a !r a �l� yrttlrl�s cn14, i 'g ahl,�s�i 1! �('3saiS sra�{�7 stl�S ash'-v,W �7r "Al 'tpj'dt�4 �Si r)S�t a S� a t r r!lS��l yr Ur r, �i lM -� � S�i��t �u� 24ti�t, 7S�li it qy�Y� v35�f�1t sir �l t a ar A sr9 k ri ,ty)€ a '' (Z�jts PSIS,{I s �1t a si m �st� 1 s} � ,` _ Cl) � — 352; > �i` sl 11 7r`rlyl�rh , , � W — s b ,���t� f ��,� f,A1! G �,(l �kSt 7 (a i\�lh?rr t{;>`P,�=S��1 �„�af --t 't 'c t���.�y tSS�t Sf�1Fv }➢{Sr` )as 1s b� � s���ri J ���`I,'va r"fig (A WS r u7 R Ut _V�` 1�`! i{ CLV �� atY ISr � �I5�3 al lSsSt +PIN laye13}��lf' kr !sa}w� "W" �r? U��tr 4 � l T CD { 7s of 0000 1-i�" Y '1"a°�Ij��� �a} Qy 1 Pi`;trt�k� d C7 00 'fi W J as r , F �7 ;� a i a u r 4� W i'! o�h�t�5 a a�at {r a fi5 Z ' �� ,, ,u11`#.r.;-, 1 r, W!}tti �4 � 1, CC i4 rtk� LL m Q Q !)� 1-. Ir7 a 4, � xir+_ a �. t y 1�7t '`k i +,yl ra ! �� t'` r` 1� �S{l } sr b 11. �rrt) j 1 i y rfp >rr r t r rS'i s II ( t t`t [ r} t I er{IN Ij O lyd f v ?z � ��' It ttUf ha rt }* u �r}rr 1 }� � } f 1 1 r ilr}i+tdJr .ems T 1 CD ' lt r k ki 1 0 N 1 LO 1 �> >1 s"`t+ s , a, � r MIA y,a S } 7 4t � �� WS R" �} ri''� + i, f{�rs�_�S�l�l�'� t�'� �`,#{ 4r� �� "�j1t`�Y��,i r)r r,� � �t4 r��Vl`•i+i},�t � ��',y��'7 � �i � � L 0 1 >, 0 MM y}}rt r (r1sf'ri 4 ��yu� 0 V �h7tl� +ik 1 ',+(+', �q,l � 1 l�r�� 'Jl� s ! Y } i a a cn }� 1 r t r { j ul , tr , (f{ Mr} r kji O iS},la }" Ss " � 4 ,!fi } u7 �rllp �)r N 00 ! , t 0 A � Ila ,}r� �( rr � OJ 0 �£k 10 w� 00 a} d a�+ p7 Y U- Al }v� On a LLI fl till t' m✓ }. 11)'ri. 1} 'till F ` t P„va, wlJu,' "` r ;� ,� ��t`�1�,� ,,t„ i��.�}3 {S4tt� #••,J ��y �.�',c� "���a 1\i 1� � 1 w"" � tI1J �xt s t'ti)f� fnfx { �1ttt fq t ` (� of p LL m 70 _0 i+ f� U ( Q 0 op �� ! �� f st �rsf vs i "Y rl 1 ,WWI t ffl ivl � 4'al�Y�t�� tip Sltts f r�ltirslf � a 1 All ttu 1 �`,aA4 CD i 0 Q1g4 N 1 . Lr) `fi f i d ilk 1� aa s }t� �jftt ;r h"YY 11 tfr 4 S4I }F 1 �l s-ai t tl r_ t� .., i'lft tg C °{. 1 CD ' 4lltt�,1 �' � f fY is �,as;t.� q i 1r ! I '�, it 1 0 i 61 L. J dF�x� �'� t*, l�1t firui'r 1 �lgff tt �i flfatjl t,�tV rrs ffi rk l° 1 1 a1 i t tll}npt Ji ��tt r �.S�tMY, d�,!ll`•s t �� ,f';f4i �� ��4 t + �Ilf- f ® cn , f O" ( - z i�t1't�� tt ,1 t�� r f 4 t �k1'�t, !f f � f � �l � , tltl�y�tjff� t,f tt t)�s 1 ti w , jlrtt( r `,' ar ui n l ) (.�S(1 tt f lIF�`�,S��Ft { I��. I �17� � } ��� Vj>��17�t1ti�df•:�'�&� ,� ���•`��}4Y � CD I ' _` I;sft� i�' f t r �l`'4{�1 sil{` )l�if��; O - yftt 00 cc �t} j tf l fi lot(rK .,t t t sill l tt t It�)?J s �. >{' •f f0 co obi co UJ i ' , i. at ,ff � l`••fii+t t a�- a fC�t���r1-`s� r F tt?,g t�?f t C � L ! t wti`. Jt z*�P t f itlt x f e,p O �_� �2 J J 0� LL gN' lf,t� f r £t t ������ t �xt '���"'® 'ttt'S� �! lr�t �4 Ctli;� "1I will l� n> 1,01TIS � `it �t1tu If g ` }t Yt�vifi' �..,{ �� W ��fqt gum", � b + � LL 7C) _O ra '{ h Q- �- 3` a 4ry, �rrr i r � f' O,. r S,4 � Srlty�,'r}� �3 �` i !j b 1 r E rE �+'1EE rE '"z rl s}\��£ r 7}3 1 Ott v iJ"' � £ M}d� CDyr i l a r E1 1 { \��E3;rtaly 4rrf �� y E�; 'Yy k4 f'�V' S r r't\#F44��ri+ r,�1�•b�-+r' rr �r, t r ��vt s� �i r � �\ r� u 1 t A' � � a � ,, 3 j Y i k . CN t4 i sv r� (� i y E E r n"on" >�� iUr( � t pf,�i7lErrrsa cn 'li lL�itirs � 1 cn W co cn O w lfj I t<s. }ir yy ry� iY{,�d�� �i' � i � tj�r O 41 o }a i v'.d�" £+<c`\S�si d r r£iv �t£ia�, ` � lC? ri r �,�� 'S'xt4dY'i' yf � E�{£Q �E iif°i�l ��',, o� m W 6s G \ r 1 4 � i�� i { r £ > rn 1 p r�k dSur E {s? `• i 1 ( co co LU s b i t 4it1 {S, O m L �, �,, r,• � � G12 J J 0 L41 f� v t qq 3 ui � k R ! Apr try j �Rk F�Nfftz� t i a ■■ {ht��` S5 z t Go 1ss»jt.� l,�i's � _0 is �3 i � �st+ f����� 1 IN 41 }r lY� R ` rs� i�jslty �I �j j a4 m 1 t' i iii t kijv r Vry S o, s rst ,rr C i a LO C4 i : EL tt psi rrs{ `! y�sr '��~ :tr klP\{ ts� rtt y� 1 {' anti Est r a rh � s �W t t 1 >��' �� si }{s i0. a grrdi i Vt A {!t: itt�t y N�+It t t� ,s�t�f\ tiffs 4 a p �'f t��}ru i� G ��f a fi ti `"(� ( `fir" Cl) t fi, r fit s` tsr ra ` r y� tk i it t i� st t"1Yi��1 v ?< a Ali - �y t f , bt t �11s fr t $$ S4 t ` t s t t �+ t3�. + e s SFr nsn f f tt ^nt t ttl4 ? Q VIA", -`s`[I 4#``"i,. 4 tlt3 »t{ts"� s n# l� }st"`; �,t Y�'{t; `` ';�t it4t'�,: s - LLI i uT Y-si ({{S �7Wx O o i stiff +" t ,fq _ x 11 ,m, tiff i r s s t f0 0 CD co 7111 tX� 4 i{{sl}} i{ �r3 fits $ils} } — �'},� p0)-j o0 W 0) i n its Sf 412 J t A 4 1 tt,,tt�t t 1 { F I t t;st na � L s st.rn§ire k 1�f�t� S ts� sty W I � d t! W Lo xa Q k N Pts � L n� �h f { ; 1 1 �q 1 �Y 1 1 CDR, LL Ms 1 Q 1 M ; O M n' • ` ' 1 2 Cq 01 N a -J 1 o_ 1 00 U t ; E 1 ; �! 1 1 1 1 t{ al t �iy°� tau m c Y T.. N �rc � � O � o C O w w > rn C7 40 LV a) �. u`L 10 i� y231 1 4 LL } rc � t C4,M 41{4 t'ti r u t� M t ttlSttA11 {W ,,q,�$����� ilt'Q `wf 1�tIEtI�t"';' � rr w 7�i,�t3 L QMM L W Q 0- LL LL O � V � •Al)tU M i �> A u,J'g Y n O O { = J ca 00 3 ' w a� m uO }, N � l d oo co J 0 U- 4 Y a W Lco Nt @@ Q0- ® as B � 1 1 1 1 j 1 j O (D ' N d (D ' 3 i O m a J _ � O 1 1 1 � ti 1 cn a� cn W J o Y LO � N �. o G1 O o C O w m w > rn C7 40 LV CY) �. c —M -r- 3 Y } G12 J a X Q W z Z OfA LL Afi O 70 t�rmv Q 0' 31, Rife NO t'}; t st a Yl - �j jai 1 A `�� 1 4 , a 3 s V�p OF CD �5 tLO U i Lu u aD co J LO o Y In N G7 O o C O w m w > rn C7 40 LU CY) i m rrn 3 ® L71 412 J J 0 LL '` a X Q L LI Z jt YES}�j�N ,,, ��`��.J��a �lL, � �` ��a} {� t ■1 �F Q LL a t 7C) @ a fsr n i­ 0 CD i 4 7"v'E yj � S' t 1 Nt� a� t #� ' •vi 'A 6 �Ytp A♦ i a N G ch rt S ;� ��t O b V 2 W t " m 1G 4}i3JEtds n ' J Lo A ' ' y � CQ f N - �4 sir, �f � � O oc) UJ CY) 4 R511 IT, 01 J o LL ��yypt at i� law t 1 pp � X kid�t��sa( }jt i�k�k 4� LJ,J ia.& Q �i t' a} ��yfa f_ Y' � , Cl- L LL70 m $k N � s [ t,; ,�9'+ 5�8 p� r» f �S L rgy � Iq i 0 0 Q 1 » 'w k cn s , 1� AW, 1 ryss t ` �rC 16, r S i it S�' 511111 a a "Sicn pie, o srga" �' �a `� > 4 , v ui LO J 4Ln Y O o w co lL W O t � 31 G12 0 4,»,, s ;1 W V' » w' L W /7 $ ,Jp Xfpt N /^L ^ , , , , ( j � LO i � i y� (D LO d t~ , N , G , i 1 m cl) ( i LO N O co cc co g Y W erw � 1sIt1 Ewt 4 . ;,;F 0 LLS( J 31 LLI # '� •j, �} r"���„airy� 4 N \/ _a h L QMM U_ W Q 0- ^� ^^W LL LL ,,AA � ^ Lo Y o Q � w ' y A r ' 2 d 0 O Y E -4 i L M � �+ ; N cn a ' o co a� W J LO o Y � N © w4� +� $ I m o0 > 0) m co Y._ r rn 3 y ,r�='�y+' J 0 LL V� ` 9 a UJ ffi® Q rr S\ i LL N p J O 7C) fIFOi N �+ S 4 Q Q yl' +iz46�� o Mil H OU + F X4 wy k ad4 i+ wqk ++ ti i ,y E p Y i d Irv,! ;y `I � i �' �r 'J i F IF b try � "i �I '�; uO LO � N �. o G7 O o C O w - w > rn C7 40 LV CY) �. c —M _r_ 3 01 412 J J o 21 a X Q W z Z EE, E8 Ip A U W Q LL LL Y ' p ; O W ~ ; D M Y (DM a� (n Im � J O a� W 'Jim k Q rh§d11 Rq (A LO CD CCD 1 M 9 +� � + O Y Q ai{Sint{ 41 LV J iy J 0 lit All Y 3 r■ OW 112 k� LL m 7C) _0 N Tl t ' 1 1 L W 1 w, '// A o {4't'�� Q 1 •� Q „} (D � 1 m i 1 CD 1 1 fr Y (D � CD 1 CD1 CL U 1 1 € UF r � ( cn 1 a R _ ` ld` Ou�E,'"'.. t MAW t '� W � { I I 43 ' uO i u7 s _ p 4) O r o oo (y0 O t r! > rn C 41 coo0 O LV 0) ' M 3 i� Y J � m a X Q rza n z It R�N I . L m L ulv, (� Oo L Q 10, ., M . (1) M � E d � Y : y m V Q ao � B cn 2 ill � W LO 4 J t C/J i t Co o j � 4 W co> o) co co J 0 U- J 15 Z a LLI �� � Z IMP 0 L W ,y 0 4 41 t t q 1 n�xolt 4 yt 1 t� �y �U71�r+i 1 1 (D ti ItoU_ '��' cn CD 1 h{ 1 i o CL E cn , �4 cn uJ 1 ,,: cn (D ®, Ln d O o oo o cc m 0o � .. d m W 11 ic 10 0 LL �X, "ply{±i � s , 1 � V X w j Q �IMV A u Al fib ti 3 + � cr LL M LLJ Q � N � 1 "yfy 1 i 1 C N 1 1 2 Q + O 1 M + QO �s 1° ch f ch � rCL 1 Q� 1 iS4S��t�i!CIS>`Si k " j cl) LLJ s17AM 1f�k�� � �` '� ftta '}5 t yln" N f �� r���11�j ��, O g Y i O W m oo LU LL npt �� s I S P l " W i Q�l t n" 7C) _0 r � @ @ ' � n a F, 5 r Fr i.... .y 1 1 1 1 y fi I t 11 Yfi�§ N O 1 •/ it � tl`k�r t-� �� ✓ it s tr;sf�k�7}r1S'r - B; sty'`��' E 00 1 (D _ rL CL s � �lt, it � 4y r { cn � � vPt i � w rf'}9r q II ry gee�'Af, uO �' gk, r l uj y �S r ` ate »riir7ys(" N 4 v urt ) f Si t t§r i6N a O O 00 co 00 00 W CY) f� J o 21 { Q W W � ,irt 5lr �r a v Yi 'r. y' tiS{ ` 141J{t{ LL p0 � � N 1 }� rF.a 3 IJ 2 1 1 1 1 i d 0 �� Q cn r > 1 o CD 1 1 1 Fu` Y �xv 1 1 tz_ UJ Ald N ui �t Wjt S4�vf. �'"`- ; r�3ta YS3 r a `LstJ' s m s i:u r� � �• It /��J�iJ F � `n i SM" f v N p 4Si f p t O co ri ar O CO LY't {J ris�� fr sF f0 00 —231 S J�$ m ty+i 01 �2 J r AV e a w y tt rt�� 5 - t� r17 �✓qkt kt�+s�, Yc LL m WON Km 1 O i � r ' � LO �� Q dY E t { (D O) p N �+ a � (D >1 d CL I LLJ p � 3iI`I 4 3" 8 � t,` l ' I u, a �4 r a �� `• N e �I�� �� k � O W W co X 41 y y .f ; t Sj�Ilttkl�tt',Y � � G12 J J LL O iM 4M i ( � X a w ""R �f��v MF td f n, f•s fir�<r f�l tfi at of l+ fr t '-., r '� 4t4f r f f 9 is2 t t 1 �y(il S7r � 1� ,w, s( tt i�f�, f af �f1 <<u t f L r�}�>a tt rya'` `(� 1f �f24�tti�s41i1itf; _ }ti�f�lYtt O m L� 7C) _0 n� offY�' OM u f 4 ties • cn {y � 1fY � 1 � S�- c� } �t)K � 1 1 •� 1 LO ty� S }I 1 N t 9 S W ) 0 1 1U 1 tflffl 444}ra� 1 }( � �Q/D (n T 1 iJ i N r r \ 1 CD rL V Q 4'rtr hf �f f i s RIP i 9 k a;ttg F4 1 Sti} a}f t -�4 �i3 7�'f� 1 YYff(h��yi i� I Yl cn r1�� 3 vS�A ® .�: �` 77 'I Sy'9 L° ' fi),� n" 2�{ t y ;2�trz SS74 4}��� �v w 1 k �if'�� A ' iff&fv lE �pE f ti ry f. ittkf ti�f � `,!s O � ' nT fff@�titr � + r�y�} f f� 1� �t f f f�iutf�� �2,?�� la �•�� ff 1 1� Ln 47 O �zy� =s f rur ft , r: CD n 4 �1 d fpfffalf A C ��� "�,' a' f �';�'? 0O W ~;os a ��� t;`t vy �f' eta 1 fylp ,fis' fR , 1�t, +t��f }ds ?��}{il,� 0 t� M p G1 °o W 0) i J 0 U- }�f; f 9�r Y' 4K V1�I tt p tif,5 r ` Mi Q LLJ f'.7)q, 0 Q 0 8 9 O o O L. O LL m 7C) _0 (d @ O 0- CD 1 t Q O V/ r— Ln �� Q (D 1 � t�( m d to Sysa IIf o V� I t t r �ttt t 4 r� tits tlb�y 1i d tl�t t t �t� �rtik� i� L t y J t t � � th2`1vt t ii ��ltl�5., ' tl,ittg 1 CD �}i trr -{t�Ndt� tt�l ayye AM i 1 to lyd d n f1�ll 4 (: ti 14 tS��y4tIV" s�t t � 3 t�� 4✓� 1 fn t eft t N { ID 4,3411 a+ fi t, 2}� �, 't S rf gLn yi � n�"z4�: `F" ' CN t 00 c0 00 $ t fq� y tt1 >t 1 j�q �F t tt t 00W �CY) O r 1'r at i t t tr- s 4t ui'- tt f t G12 J i4 Y f-W 7�4 , tRt��iyy+ tt - ivFtiitt\��y;Iry Ge t t ti .t k !q2,'�„t iC,isr s+ ��'; S M1t. �l� �t�tuft u�t3�Kf St4ty'crtt y t:��it �} X W L O MM� L W Q 0- ^� ^^W LL LL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q 1 •O V/ r a Al)> Q � � v E aD � � � � of 0 cn >, cn N J 1 0 qz ( ; U Q o© © 2 p q 1 O 1 1 o � 1 0 LO 4 p o Cl) q 10 j ul u aD co J U) 11 ryd Z ry I U7 Y ©0 u7 �. N p O o'r G7 O O C O 00 O a+ O CO I 4 10 00 © > rn 1€I o 41 00 231 LLI us i r APPENDIX D — Public Input Presentations, Surveys, and Results Stakeholder Meeting Presentation and Menti Results d�' `L II ` ' � � � �k � q ,I� �. � � ��, . � � A h ,.� � �� �� � �� �t � �' ji t" �� �� I '. _ P c ,e � � u' c � � ��p,'.� 3 iI � — — s 4 � + 4 1 l � 'y a � y. _ ..� k € _— _..._. § s } � � x�, `' 1' c ��h �( �� r ; �, �` ��, � v �� �` � � � �� ��� � ���� � E fi� t � �7r,' .r � '� 4 � 4 � *� 1l I � Eg+ t W 5� � � d il's �e! � i� r� � � � ��� �i� �,r� � �,. k� j'���', s� ���, ��� i � � fit,: a� n 6, ' i �r u `'�� as � E r '� s f"ui °t«� � � � - �i� � � - - � �#`�'�.� a - �� i U, � ��.f i, r , ,� � � _.._ .�.�m �� ��� �' � � 'R�, 3 I� � - - �` 41 sp _ }4 " � E" ii i ���, (�� �t��" �:t: �,�k �1'� � � s 3 r � � � � 1j �., \ ` w �i � � � � i � `F +�� � ��� �� `r �' �,, � �, ��- " � s ,: � 4 — rr + e f � � �� t� �� f I�` n �s'- tt t'� ,u ��:_ 3' _ � �� �i� i i � � �� �_ � µ � � t f. � �� � ��` t,�� � �� , �: � E�f„�': , ;�; � ��, `. t Y f� ; f __� E_ � m: ���� � 1 � �' ���, ., �� { t � � , .: z �� z � , {, t�` � ' K � -�— _ �� s� s �, t� , it � I r t �� ,, ' t Cz1 i.'`�I '`ter �_; a ,.-. s .......... AZ TA r 4� r i it 1 t ifr �vst;t,tftSs, �}� r s - f ,t ijrtirtl flr�it s`1S}}ltis'ti � �;;�"!Us - r s�r II�IIII�� d ri�fi�'>ii is _ ,r}�y�r�f irW, r s ii r s£ fs fii}j��, W ,r - ;r - i s , r,' '}' t}irr As ifs}trI,�r,,�t - r�lrr�) I r ,f ( stb to s � ,} l'r` rat" ' " C}rls rt i hs fr 1 r�lis f r t - �4�1}},�£,rl't'����1111114�f - � , 1944-I t;4t � r`�,� low, \ j - �i}irrS�+ �� +trrrv�3tkk p t 4 1 1 - i ty smsm ymnumm v v,l,'' I on top I $$ r ' - i r tit }r r s�}lt �ti,�rt��l�Ili�il��� �1� � �� � -- "•• -` h rrs 1r r1 `i�4�IIIIII I�� - - t,:. 't rt yptSrtAl 1119 (}1<{ +'rt (Iill�q ��ttii�i�i >4 - it i 1 tt �� i{ r 4 ti �i{v��t,st{I r Illlllllllllllllllllllllr I i i t�xr r+M�t�� lotMAR Ill(G Tilt {�{ �fyk l�iY 1# € ' •1 :. 1 r � 1 4 t} \ riril r ilG.S }1 ti tt144r i2�'1}r c �`��� � ter•, rjt � � � � ��, �r'� �,v Altr aaU i r,' r` vkit 1 ry �l I t �� ���1, - y 4}ti y 4 ril'{rl�rE#� tfN 4tu{� , t r 1�i�17\ii rlslit vi�it€liflrt���)}li �hr � E < irrri�\os�it'rt1� � �i{�a � Il�silrylii I( 'rrl�)€��ityyl��Ett s 4 ,i���h f - s+ls vow TV t, t WXYTNW QG ; � F slss ` t j Sf NMI tt�� � `d S 'r s(ts t 33 - VA tXi ' tU - t — t - a i 1 S t4t,!t3t}�}liMOO ONE t Y 2 1� r It�)t1s - i SRI t t, r,r2Y s r tSs l�, i rtistl4��� ��� - IY t _- l�i ti 7t s�1YV�jIf4+1YVi 1t s\ tt 1 °% "�` i t tt tl� t }f t t r 1 jltt ti(i ,i�r ' trt Ott t`s }) Jrt tti }, t t t� t g s t{ttt(ii it,lpvt� `fit s � trot i ,t�Yr�»t v � ut''ihY�'Yttitt�lt'(`t�i{�'�illti r ilhsi}r{fii�( rrst\){�lSjt�f1��r��i 4 ��1 f - � Il i sit{Sl,£1 llll��iu,l � �S ?s Iss RS tl ksij��llS t� - 17 - f - I rl I I I >i £'� It�k�JSf�ltt�� 11 Il J Nr iK t1}f�&� �i Ili iuuuuuuuuuuu r i I 1 - il kWI Ily, Y, It - i>t I I�l�IIt lly qw l`I;�k1I�(S�l - rrr 1�I'��� tttttttttttttt atiVAkoqq i I kl rtr s s 11 iksk, . I,i � S; III Iy '�I i}x 1 �1 - i i���l tSt4k �iU1��1f1 - t i�Il's t fs �IH£11V�� tt'f t! �iq� a2 c!l!F'7�ittl'rrl� `� t (� 1tW14r`iial�4�1, ����� � A �" ,i " MOWS WWI ,?k� r l tr t p t 1� tii;s ti MEl`i Ik ill ai r 4ittl a t t t iy tl st fi Imp ) ��al��� ll�i}}' r (- r i to r� ty��nt��) � �y I�I �`�`Y `•a�zy u — �I }` _.,� 1 t it tl it t)ill4t 3 Ig t p i f t » r k rltta �k I �wg{ �� — !ra r t; A')1 I as s t �ti 1 {ttr l � � tll t.... it r t t t ,r d ON Ss �I ' WN s NMI e Als 4t£�'1", i l w tI If ' }+ lw`ut, "OAK t 4 sf ti+3 4t a+ s !lf£ri+In f iNt t 1+ ,'t1 +it!tti it({ It�f)�Z�l ��}'� IN, 3r �r p dC f�s1s}tS ° t , 4 � 2 ttg w• OEM: PWMR 07 Was, 0,110 IBM lei 4 co s , l Ian RUN, 04 LED , r r + fm11 I Qkj IF I (Sl(11! _ S�£ft , �Sr �ii rrt t` i� 411{�ii +� f S fjJl4ijlslf{ `I{t i law,rli'�t 1 s} - � 1 � r+t113£ Ty i — \ i1#v1�+ijrrnritF llf r (� i s i 8 r 1{ iIt sit �1� rt r + sv ART Wl tt�- rONE � l s low — } s small, ISO" V +1 � �,y+ 1'' �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII — llt r r O E r � _ AMR, A \ IN 2rt ' i c� })1)u � 9+ SS�vS� tui 1rIj ���Lj '�� it rr i hi ti tii i )l}ir\411� , � tti+4 i{�Ir�l{rt�41J(2 i �}f4� ��Iz vi rtstrt l l ) El tt'SljjVl{S�Y—ji 1 a 4 � t- �1 �1 Ws i 1 7r 1£ 1{r° �u� ��! � r4ti 1S44 VRA mA - 4 — 1 - � — it t 1t341i — t 4F 4 £� 1 z m t _- ;ii ht �oittt�n 1 - £ tttl t 1'Y� 11'\1`Stl�t� ���il � tt�� 1 +� lksjW � Ash ta£\S 4 � f t gggp �—td' �t _i 4 v 710,11, s4 z fit£1 1{tS ttj14'r ltttrYYts�# � � — ! 4 -- t- !I it Iy r y11SppS (i 1+ ;� OP, It MIN QII 0 PAW! an - y - 1 ss£ Ifi 4 f i mM t yyl um ANN } �6t3�� 0 111 - ,I sly s f a� fsy1 ,�r l{ } jjg tax Q, sytS� (}�i � 1?� s1 +�i��i 4}� I y I Ir 'th tt -+} its r t t4 I It 7 s y tt 1y 2 t(\ S�4,t� bit - £All V'VVVp �m t t i i y tl}r rys �It}i f �� AMU Istsi4 I(S ��� bi } l 1i ���� miri�� t y si} li l kk , i — I i s It sSsya4sl yIiNiSl�t[ r s �t �tylAN tyt Ti7}£ s it lit 1 ry F y x - y� - 4 sc � - Is � iySt i},yyJy�Fi)hl}y L s I - 1 - i�t`{'ytts£i l »'ts � u'''iht�'tttily�yy'ltyil�'�iSlti r 11��o f s(fSt7j � r 4 st Li ( s/sl'�tl is 1} }V 1 :11skt{141rs'b�i1„���a 4 - - ,., ': rS r .Yw RAW l a LED:'>,a IT'- a v !�7r I Z - t( ��t t�illl1 � An r ua '1 t'IiJIaS�IIl Srij� t� � s �4, f A�, � a pp I; a trsa ' ifaiia'� l�lill��i A Mal > ! t 44 014 nw - S is tvr)}'fa�l'1'c1}S\l', NWQ aa, b1� a72aSiNsi�fsril6a4�r� , �lSs� 1r�( '� ��' vt � a� t a s (2� - { �� lv a ltt r asap S �� " �r r a; a r r W.hil r}t s 5711 � -- !'i�rr�a '�U11t fit( yjjy�� � - s �1 v i a 4 }Gt pf - a{vi tfwi 1� iS �qT + Ism{r l a{��} trl�� - ���y(,fit}`•,�}}'�wl�a������}},a �,.,P� �+� � `' �- - _ tlivr�tv'S �'�itlti r Il�siSrtiii�( jv�t1��r�li 4 ��1 f ,i1,v&s{li{rs'b)4�1�����h p C. � ,s phi r�. ��}�,I ,Y� '�� t•' s �; i, xfsi t I� t �! i nos n , t t n ,}awl too? i m C� tiliil l'ksl , i r { t: �r Ott� ` -ir' mot'.. �:. ', •'i t'U E ail ft mmug;VON LIN IX t Yi Ott; I If- a Dip 1 0 1 r, t tt p Canso, bism 0, 1, f{t 17 g0, 1 1 R, vl� I t �Aj �0 1% A 1 W. %5 t i st? 40 y ci s � 1 t � rw„ r din f iic�yy,� 5 s t _ ; 2SS A,�V��\V,p P, I - I I j 111ki `'e Nil ' - �ti Sil{tts�r l�tts}i� Y - i� t t� � hk rA s 5d t �{ �,VIAVO IN {il t i }as ls ' £ 0,s "t`li �``,ti4 ' i � ' � Mk�t --- s _} sy 8 MAN ON wy Rp o MAN MR 6 s £� r• v fs{WAX LEI }'��� Pam t ell i 1 - i� Iti:I t }ti`I 1 I S WPM � t i # t �{ f t t j j t 0 I S f �W S n �1 i 1 ti. ��ta iittVt S}r tltllt It �� ` t}�k eir k\l Jt itlt}}h\1�11 �y Vi i�t}a 11 si` � — ,� 3 Silt IUtl�1 �llllh� � I v `laOENOil �u Tj S 1 4 N t AI.'. VI % j , I + 0 3 I tllltil}r � s 'III�h{�"f- It 111 l t i ����411��1 v )���1 7 ....}} 14 S ➢ yt 111 1 111 "Wo nwe ' 1 � t7 s- £ �{sss i Int{ldl st is Is;. s v, i f is � s i 51 �£ " WH£WHO: ( {' m rShyPt{ --- � s { §t (tl" ems y\ is ! �s'4 CD lot ZEu� Y � s s t{ O t lq? 40 warp no s I q yz yip I 3s )-tttt s,jr t j t It1 t{t vj. �Qlirs�t� s�s s�� std�S s I s i£tU ttfi 4 ttt 14 1{l t 5 ti t � An Me IN ALM; to r a ON y ' ,��taJ«}y AP t A�Fmwm 1 t } r� t R � 7 'tiR �r �I�", sty i - s_t — li r - s V {iSslsll tl�i 14 — 4 }s i 1�it�S lStP1i flifi��`1ti �Ilffl� II�,- r � — t II t I JiI't'{s{st11il1�ij�14 t4���� I�� Ss� � a f itt t 1 ' r1 bslitltt tyi � - — t} }tt tt}i1�(��s tl{{s�j S�ylfil��tftt � — t — t — t t!4r I {i�i}t�l 14 iuiilt'tIs�i __ s i s itttti t r�i j U r't}� 114ii)1 ttttlt'tC �t}Ivll��t �� - S - 7 1 it tSl LL �{ I ttl��ti)��(ittrti{s`'•;'tt���)i{} J �tl� �trii �iiti t'4t14Srrt,t141{�� My - ; � 4! ( t ity ryas\141��i}3 s' — 7 i t t t t slut it��144 �1}ii�"� i i tss ^sti ltvl �fi�{t(;j {l�tli5����ii� ~•., ��. _ _ s 4 itt it4 filil i;•,{��\!t 34 t i I ��. —� _ at tt �si {ttt�tliiill ..... � {sttt My 4 }1S wl I4v1� ��y�Vy — i t bx:i{sAlt$tsl fllj�i��i�i{i��tt��� 1 =fi, � — illi ti iti44��44i1111Y1�1�����t�1��}i7�tU��i � — tii — slt — !, 'lltrht 1�rSrts j}ri rJibtti��tY{331hhul �t t Ijli 41 t tti(t 1}Iir((} � _ is t s S t — t Sstl i}f�l t }� )stl�tttA4sy�7 t1 _ — r r 'tnttt sltl�s�11 s �{ - s — f — iht{sitilttl ��1tS1��"(44i��sS tty�{ltb t k — 7 ilhstl}rite�( ,rti�37��it 111l,t�t 4 }"a 1t i41ih;1{i`J't''4i�i\(ti p2 lS' i3 4 Otis+ I�t}\t I2} �{5l t #� i 4l}ttttSi}�, s- s s Ohs Itt — to Sit}+ti f i s )}�ts i� ?f;�til�Sli}� 2>yi AY4.A}s}r 7 .- {t st list at at+ :'' � t,,_t t to � s ps i1 `s � : 1 4 Il tt} i,ty oil -- t� }+t (1 l 1 t� psi si(+ t, t���ti�s ���� " tt F �gi 1 r7 t Sid, s { ft� )!tts;ti-si Mae , i �a 11 NO ✓+rl }} U, t W}r sttt t eta tf ,�s IRV I ' 7 sesr� to lI �two 0,1� Iis iiy is+l}tsil}sa i � k lip, J - - �tt rt ts's�b itt t}} +tit �II t s _— td+r � tt t}�lyttt�tiF}!�Itt��(ii} is IA IkslU Jtiij{I sr`Yy 2��I4t��''al,'t p can, sf(i I t S — II �17 all i t f 1 IIIIIIII I a _ �- � t r t i itr� t r WoolIN rirlr ,i - r it' t li t iit 1��}i i> �r�i - ii ' a sir i ji� �� nr• q >�))}1 �� � ttu `'i+� _ :� �� - _- - - -. - � ti i i li r� ft 3rs 11 k st� N r tS1s.r � N Gir t 11�iili j1S�`1i{r}" i�y NS � Sja 1r �}1\� - r��1��rs - �?��}r('{r - II i1�,ti ytS i 4}1�{;�iti`1 ? li t t+lf qlt l41r r) �I � Alms 4w I0rl {. d 1r }us\4Rti�`r r�l'�1�`�'}i1132 (t s t� '�' '�k. `• atis {tray( ts' rst a( s ,y as _ s t - arr - i i}1 (iritkr rat a1� - }t)tlrSa ltl 1�11 ja'i s;l(1(is� 404 �� ' 0—Ma"MAQVIOMM1t - „ ol it t 4aa v 1 14WA -- ���- #� 7 Ia 44 q1«"'was 1 a 1'AN '{arti�i a s\ 3 -MIN I41 1}` wow N"s }lair>>'si'aV\a'2 € wow 14 ;MOCK? WWI tad ( i( �s vrail'' PROM � ��3 a 1 1114us�aa�3 ��� ts a i Sa }f ul }�r�st t Nil `�Il r sus rl � a���'�� s4ttt4�� r s li�t1 lair �3P - r ttatlSlll'f41h4} ���� �' ), is S + �fif Slit ii���tirt���`��1��';����t�Si � _ f• - 3 rS )s r tirr ri i�'j + i}r i Irrr�lifSh f�ni�ll f 1 1 ,r Srsr htrss}si�2\l��lrstit��\�����r�F��ll� - r r r�itirl)ri\fi\ �it�� f �1 s i s rsi gtsi Ir ltj`lt fr4f}l�rS)� S � - � rf fh+ > sl sft�V�t lid - � -- � - Off fi + fJllj�� 5 f-WON, - - 12N „r tmsowl -��- s f S f sit r h'+r�sgiih�h�f �ti�h�rt '�� t s rl � r � ii��i4iti21�lft trS�f�}!��CIS: � ,}1ft r ftrf,i l�tit{{ -- s - � f r f(+s�liSrsss rf�i ` 2 'l tl h trh rrf thrrlh � I �� j � s �h4sf�r + �q, �ss�sssssss r l t}c if +ij jir rtl�f�li fv ��ct�k V�� _ -- � - ff4r1 )) 9 1 k 7 } r 1 � - 4' � 4 r i�ht is isr tVllrfis'`'lr�U)1�f)A�1�tt�l�l� -_A - ( - t r - r ti r�is ��t�yStS t _� - }i t � �t illt�411Y�Yti t � - 1 (i} ij�itr}�lii}1l i� i 4 it 4r!\1)ll\\2 11 - 71Ss1V��� � �- ' i it A Two i t' si 1 f- it(ftyt\s - i - r - r Oli `1=� t ti i4 �I IrstJi�7\ rtr��i 09 �i��l)i�Y2i it t Evil s �� MW YS�)it�l�ljYl�(1`j�t$?01 1 \DS\�����lii — Ag­ Owl t `- C i s t r F j { U s ii t ti -- t rr irti fu - r tf \# "Ni1 - % i } yy1 i i - Vs - {s�i - ii - � i - i i t + s i11i iy�p 1 OWN - isy, — `t�ts a lS t)a Ifl'- 7` I7 r4 rfyl ��ii4 slJ \,r( - t �j 75O7/ � � - t i1 i tl iio j4 i f)Y 1g sI( k _ a S no mr yf ip Al MRW OWM t Ijfi } - s l }� - , 11 - �7 7r �I s; MIA MI ��y17�'`};�1,'�j Fs t� 7317 4r (S t .1Ff t , f„7{1 , T 'i..... In fl}yf�s�i77 YA - , a 33jj �Y 31P u �a t ft i I t I- sn �\ itlr }it -f tl� s9 5.r 0 LAMM IRA LO 0 oOR r � "n a i tititititititi777�{rl��':��� , II lI ��� �11 �; k �9® sou co C3 t "I All, 'o NNW 0 0 4mJ .wow 4mJ 4 5 tS t i ftt 14 t3@ it 1�r4 riZ s 1 rrt i I J� 8Tk � fl fle 1 t r t s � i, � � h sill) 11 C S JA it 1 s i l t 1 1§S�ittri r� , �1' �t'Il(rts� l ' it �� {t tt \ ttu ss f � - It is i 3 — iS I' vs rt i 'tt t,rl � 1,t\luv r t z s S INS M - t Kul {S�i4 ,t � r )� ss { t{s � � �t r�+� v Sg (lr t I} it4 MARM, Wow i rt irris tS ��i 1�rIr t � �Kt}fit ss• �1�t � 3 s "N", s MU, t r, �A i'tt ............ i} Si} sus q — 71 1 11} 44 = t ttst ( n rililltitst��`'Ssiii,(irll tt �1 t � Il�si�r lii�{i s s � 0 wow .,�.. ,.,..................................... .......w .....,.y, 10 0 Up N a a MAUL ONO L ,P r ------ i i Ne0 wow i a, s feu ............... 10 Up J2111, MAUL pO �i a � P �r � 9o-q 7 P dF S n, ) o £ }n.., 0 �L.4 CO 4mJ All 0 wow ............... 10 fl"-) 3`�. r,.'y..,t W k 9 !J7, �! �a Up 711, qp IL AWEL m4imp 17� ONO'"" L--------------- , , • � w zlh ' I p a 'a W „y, , �+wow �iA i- ..................................... ,, 10 L« Up 'R K� 9. }•u xn u P AN&L Ou C4.. tfj q o L---------- r F 6a= vas s s s s f s £ R s 1` � IbAC s !tea s f � r Is �.ru t; s "a< r ita O € ,F i- H............................................ 4.. _. w. a �.u.Y o; g,x i Y Up malimme s A O. is.. "„"..,,"„"..,,"„"..,,"„ LIP All I CA 41 ip 4"l 4mJ OWN" ...... .............. ................................................................ Up ZAV� . .... LZ ap mw� 4J� L---------- 0 wow ............... ----------- 10 (3) a 7upb ........... it u IL AWN, C matimp Ar--& L---------- 411 at ib O'N x f3"', k"r� 4mJ ..... gvp, 0 wow ............... .. .................................... 0 tl Up N a '511 E rl IL AWEL ff m4imp Ar--& L---------- OA) 0 wois ............... ------------------ 10 Up (""i C5 iq IL AWEL IN CIA ONO'"" 0 L---------- b s y y'n s s �a,_3 X s-. s s s g, 39 ° s e i ZIA is wow Y,y ..................................... (3) ,, 10 Up a IL AWEL A r„ u„ 7 e a � a .,m k .ONO'"" 4,S 0 L ------- Si ju,6 9J CIL If wow q 11up eE", ...................................... 10 Up 0 l q_ oli a AN&L 4" mat"o u. .Avow— L---------- 3! J! V rl 7,11 IV 7.9 cx v ¢ ql, 77, Vlo _,V 0 wow 10 VIV sit Upaxe 5b 47 OW AWEL 0 won.mm. L---------------- 0 7$ AWL, c", 0 wow 10 ,77) Up F"I Irl P41 AWEL 4p N)6 L................ t u Pit - { AI'M Alp rhit(� '��� s - 1' ' rr(r oil " _ '' L 11 (f . G,,, 1NI r s r k � s - r r t{h� �t �• It - No } r r { rsPao r { - ����tit�7ii�4��iStit�t}t)������� - � i Amok is C-0 PAN""" @rtl 77 � � b N I ar l m3F r a �a a Pat Pill . 0 <„ ,s s me �•e q7 iw s �ll WID cn CL r-A sue `:. r cd �m tee„ G, CP (.3 apt V19 0 LT, Amok Q. ED (D O CIL J 0 77)S-1 (n 7p 5 D Jam«5, M 7 ffi 7; M7 cn U) sh ONE" 7-3 CL -LL All-0 w elD :0 -�Z, Cl a" in M lk Ail r7 (7fi s"I ON 717 77 = _;_, LL- 7p, w 7'CL 4 1" A Lo 17, 0 Cho LO L...............................................J ...................................................... ID dye 9 Amok Cl� Ll P L, C3 t. 0 > F13 L- M O'D its UD ps&, cn sh ONE" do ca OD A"P (3) ev '5 Cs. HI 77 60 C3 LO lE L...................................................................... ............................... Ikil c) LO J Amokw . -7 .0 < t.-O > (n Co c" R 77 A e,) tr (y) c :, t i ;7 E � C3 ll�- -L� 7� L) JD > all -73 01 73 lyl �7� il 2 77 6n (7) ro 0 ONE" Awe 7 d" a) u�o CIO Lo 7-1 X, 14) 7 > .in jL, m iL FF cn o" EL0 P S2 'Y Ei 4_-, (D C.'D IJ 75) L................................................................................................J . .......................................... uks �• � t a<d Amok �p 4t 715, t. »� s PAN""" sO yam. a a CA �IN ra a dCL �e 1 x (1s 1; lz ° U) 0 I� d P Q�s a t da a W & ro77 -k s, Ell- €& € e i map mo d ii �1 . psi - j ti — s - Itl 11�h ri hs tf 9 f s - � t } 1 �s S�� Pls/ IVlc s4{ir}�gJ t( 1 �ONO rrs � t VIA,Mow In - j1 ! Isis i4 fi i!yr�j ry+i;Z,s; � \ 1 s s rr t s r�fi } rrts } sW rot it - >j t}fit - t - t - t s r 7 I as ft f s)Yssa s s r�}tSt�tt�l 1 1 l�l _ - sstr } - r stt 41\MA I r Public Meeting #1 Menti Survey Results 1 1 4 9 r j j ._ tt .....� 0 Ja tjfx}i 12tj cr cow t I 1 C I a5{ . 0 0 4mJ .c a) '7�)'f P\\s 54�4+t�t jv}i(Ji Jl;t45s i,+.ti fF iJjJ�4}v)}t v((s{ty tJt yr{slP,t� \k yy;:�t� tr is)lv}q 1rS}t'.�1�t}st}\ ts3f l;rl t+r\}�i�(+s^v;l t>+ tV 1t,�yr 7tltilt}J lfsl i-1 Iiitr, -___._.. kjisli7�; t�(} +7,�> s}I+�1iv Srs1 j15 i};{+�;{t`lt t1r?{- ilf;l+;i1 �yl r�tl}(v st�i}{sr yi r(-�r lti s+iiJyy.}Ltsi„ir tS,J}��Ssl situ t i�: C%lm ows tsi"i i? 1 r{t\y 14ti l i'1 4 + ..tUtrJ tlr( t� iy Ss tl ii4 i}Ittt yfi r lit tr�tlr}i)�iJ if}1 `s,.rt sl7{itliDt,:t ssf t rt 41,. I1}s�:? r tiys ++- 1{s 1 1;i v 41 If �ti Stt ittf t - } r�Sit sflk rt it tJ 4't+fir i tS}�i{s4i\J,.)4\S ssy}i J}{risl'ty!}tti++,,I+t i! itst"sit tsi t�}r tis''j t31 Si(1}r!!rf It}ir4tt7 t s}a isrit\iti vYt rrjs J(.'if �r 14it f I:r)s;i ii t\ a!1 1 } {i 4i ty�s{s jt }f!7 }y�` t /J y�j441r,: �lt J .t t�(+iJt. t��j4itis tk 4}it)i',{tr1fs� tl i 1YSF t(t 4 .�i;s(\it+Ill�t fi s\5I(+j pi slv d,{ y 1 litt rIl>itiiJ{ iy(f: ti;! i sti t{t!s }it'it ttSl(i}st�{ ____ - �S�}}!;r ili yuiiisp}jlfAt rS VJ�i>3i�\ri Sty ir,t}r v tri lt,;tl�7t\\{}1 pS)i+2 rti(\t�,lff lit rrS{rlir t}I4 vYJ3��it)t{t i�_t fit rlts rl., i� i) v<+; 1+11`i,�; ,,jj�'{� I} r :){ (r rl� titi tt 3 (( is rl ry}�t tiiy t}i 1t ;�I lr}71 f #i�Sj it {t ro, } r;s �s 4 }y - IiY;3�S`)£�J jlf I,it,,5;7s!}t ls2lr tt i�t't_{ i ft71j1}i} t{ }r,;lS s } \`Jt{J 1 1}} cuss l}i Si isi}Sj r'r+t tip}i!(}(tt,�� tf}�i r}sy{}tr, lY illy+ � ,(, Itt (Ss r} ( t f + �l r t +( t rr } it 4 ; } 7 iini psi trt;y N tt t s S'tr�l f�tl7j`7�f,'iy rtrv{� t��-tt\s7 ft+lrf,t175 J(+�A�i+}t t(r4 rt trt,4rft ttyj):_J ili(l+ Jt(t(J7 ft}}i ftslr� tlr t4�lt srlliii �St sil pit tti s+yl(:t }1t -Ala ak, iti(i�,t`'t y}ii y,; ii}sl}tt r)iti;s }t ly r i�}lrs({itf�ril{sI{{-; ti r !\llt+.1 Sl}i yiltt�I;{tivt tlli�} r \�, �S,t +}k}}r 2t yty7}r tti ti Jtlr tysl}il i!{USif y; Rohr— *"low 0 �& dr, A 0 (n \St 1+,s{y!i rtr7jl tt 11+itjl�'„{Z+rySlt4c`� t \ 1{ti rft Ss ttri it 71.7;})}r if ltltlt i R r.ilt;i ftl t �4,f{!Ir ti tyYrrt rss Stt+r 1 t ; +! 1sl_�})i ,r{{�s}11i+i trt _{�,l,,i�ss,,�},i, i�S�s ty ,,iti ra'tlfiilsif}(t} ,1t4 }ySr�rr jSltr)1tUi{}2�+'rts7rirry{SllI'ir tr}trryttl''ir tr;Jyry4ll'ir lr;trrlttt'�'ir lr;trrlttt'�'ir lrt .. S�%ts j( t} 'y;(f\t tt(1i}s,) tI y r - i t tv.: tv tv tv tv tv tv tv tv tv tv ti tv tv tv-tv tv tv t, t t r 1 1 • 0 PEEN , — j I �( ir�,rtl�t�'��rci4l I S Sr S� - cftrrs �_ LM i cat�{t r J Led CL 0 0 Lo Co I �1t'S trl ili4ic�sf tl,D — t,r §q� �" , � !1 l�tr ,t is cc fl I - �th{tVs� i�t���tJ tytis t� - i!` �lttjtyt�t�il l�f�lilti �t�olt �j£�ittl`lftyilltrs�y4U t£S ti4�i��l t`sls rt�f b, �ls{s tt s t t(( d tiP I tt}`Jr is�p l,hk pdy i� 1 t WWI 0 co !£pttf� {�A �tdttt 1}�t�l4�sE s Ii{jet � t I rt t stt is I st� tP�i�I' ss s}Isiytttttj£,tt tts i}ti�� ytSi� Ott si - i tss li S s,r rt4t 'I�ti�(�tii� - }:,_i�tts�t} t '�lt � t igatt'�sks t,is�stit'�tts ss��tt�t� � - -- s;Ikt � t7 fsjxrt� Sri t, p � t its .............. "a,; t ,`�ishrsi t��pt dip ... _. t �t U, r ?S�t 1 ir{ 4e� �Irl��fry'. 3` - a a ji ti a� 4-wJ jo ARA L L > am M-EMMMM6. ........................... ............ ................ 4-i 00 ARM NEW 0 mi 0 4vJ > 0 0 a 4wJ- ww U) lu, ARM mc Aim OMPOPM- ryl q. I. ajC CI*A r"A 111ilu 1111�% .............................. eta WW 0-1 w au 15, .................................................................. ,v2 Cl*A fj at ,7, n r '-x. , CIP C3 f, A 0 '-7!M �Jl poop ........... K, 01 r a d.9 F Y " 1° C,7 v a �4 4j 1 � sa ( a Nr N �..�s!pp rT 19V �fF s sa a. d mu N� 'C3 - CI a, P; 1 a r rt r.. i 9f 4 0 u k ouy a tc poop" ............ d as e " is imp d 4 uN �i 8V s s fi� is i5 �..,. -.n CI*A AJ qj s I s 3 x� hA 'd r m N T it i e �v09 e b.:II gmv M kr° � rA I M 9. u� 00 9@se 9 r� #,ar r µ I Sh r, e i 3 p .. v , �qY(r M 's M cll* n-p .. q�d 0�9 `� l u•' 4 3 G " � aF N $yW kj) tre C3 00000 a F � t,fi RiR y �F ° .. 14 I M€ is rR I s S;A 4 P w' a Epy,6 s z� s s s � s s i 3 o ' N ,v u N g' yy v a y` : C3ib a u9" � n d € 6 tf aw ......... FJ ,j-R mwj C3 C3 47k 5, oxi 'N , I NU f" Sall c., J., p71 ......... NTJ 60 "'p ................. 'ii iv L K) LKN 1,— kep Ql U-1 C- aar ti7) "' o"N 4YA "AD -5�12 C3 v e P m_ ) WJWABW.- FT loop'" i i s � s s s p; s �,V• a p 4' is 3,u Z� f ,s s s s s s � s s E 3 3' I 4 pyu tl IIS 4 fi ev .., �p ,a � @ r� 9 § In CI*A a ¢n ° r a W flfi €�R D �Y �_•� @ 3 s 9 P nyRi as r bd YP @@a R Rai P '�� d E o ra 9H 9 F ,,pp lgg,p N d � x'Fa 3R 4�dq e_it €dig 4a� ,. R•� i � x= 4r. 5 !k, 4 7 € Y 9 tt � a � 71 .................................................. C3 g l 'h C .,: yr 5 � iR 4 Cl 9"1 cl, 7 2 X, UR O"A ."M r7l ZZryy j L'2" 13 Z'D, 77" 0 FYN B �i9 g v- C3 J15 k7) a m v 4„ �gn J p4 4' 4 a.t l ry� Pr � ti ., 7-4 Cl*A (71 'K �n P .. n ; RI, Public Meeting #2 Menti Survey Results 1 4=J I E I I t'1i b� f yfS llliilliilliilliilli %woof NA i go >,N 24{ r IV t � !1 yr„v, ��,' trs�t�';'3i/z!�{{frfxt!{�tlsQ41�'A«y�iti tytt{� y�ut� !�t_ tif� 'ny woo E I I U s`, ry 1 4mJ Sw I mama C7 11 0 U o ON � o 4a IL m MF in, W in O }' O D � U 1 4=J I U �- � � � � N � :4=+ � a O � ' � O • � � O = a O � Q � O iL 1 WNMMMMMMMW 4mJ io +iiEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE��EE�+EEE��EEE�EEE E EEE EEEE�EEEE�"�,'�@���u y �S ti tis+ �t ?st l i1 S �1 tni i , 11I t 1s r t ) r try , i 1 4mJ un I 1 r, 4� 40 mm& £££££ l £r) t i�£I 1£t a£ t£� 4�(qh I� �j{�� 1+£ £ t 1 � t ��i£ iiJ S}iyt)1 f_ J�y£il rt� th i 1 4mJ Sw I yi �y � V 4=0 0 >0' N a 0 4-J, • N 4 4mJ' 4-J 0 Q I +iiEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE��EE�+EEE��EEE�EEE E EEE EEEE�EEEE�"�,'�@���u it� � � f�)}rii�S(�'�i�{)i������%�(���h{.I�i(} tf I��itt ft{ jli�sil isjtt Slj i rt�,�N��tj�.���ittJt�ij �I� t �S�tj{C��(��y?�iti�41��t�S t�l}it��j{�• ih l h > �i � i t �y ts�( i tall i fit � s� ii sS 0� =MOP 0 %0.�o � ((istl tilt(i tit�i� t�r'�i i�i��rf�S n it�i� tii�rf Jl; 1��1 �}}�ilt r� }1il r��r13�}1i;r��r13�} �\}r�tist yid i�s i�'�u�rA s'r)t�f; a 4t!dti'it�y1����ft��,t��pit?���ftyl�d�i�(t�,y��f�,yl�d�i��it�y1���ft��t���it�y1����ft��,t���(t?���ftyl�d�i�(t�,y��f�,yl�d�i��it>>�� i�}t��14�4A}1 11 1 d1 '1 ;Ih-- ;7 '1 d h", '1 ;7 '1d d rF '1 ;Irk d rF ;7 '1 d d lA'1 ;l� r��r�r_+ f 4 { i +iiEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE��EE�+EEE��EEE�EEE E EEE EEEE�EEEE�"�,'�@���u ir. R s s R CIL -- a 1 ClIft 0 = cn 177 � a m i re „ s s � --------------- AL, CL 4-4 all {� a , r TM g Z CL Cal 35 �. va ., d 0 16,— 0 w,� - s � Ol R. N 4 o a 4-1 Co g i s -37 05 s; co PIN 00 n , u < 4 is s s P 4-0 r - 6 ateVIMJ u 0 a. W&M jor- 4 s I! s ; s CID u1 4-4 LL ojor— k f n..... , Public Survey Results (Website) 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey US-1 Transportation Master Plan - Survey Question'1: Where do you Live? 100 80 60 40 20 �fr)r f � _. o �. rd Q Answers Count Percentage Big Pine Key 44 10.16% Islamorada 90 20.79% Key Largo 87 20.09% Key West 92 21.25% Lower Keys 64 14.78% Marathon 38 8.78% Miami-Dade County 4 0.92% North Key Largo 2 0.46% Palm Beach County 1 0.23% Stock Island 6 1.39% https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 1/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Tampa Area 1 0.23% Other areas within Florida 2 0.46% Outside of Florida 2 0.46% Skipped: 0 Question 1: Other The word cloud requires at least 20 answers to show. Response Count Slidell, LA and Key West(commuted (oneway)8 times this year.... 1 Philippines 1 layton 1 LAKELAND, FL 1 0 ..(.a..F; 4 S J .,. : 1 9 Question 2:Where do you work? https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 2/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 150 100 50 03 Answers Count Percentage Big Pine Key 21 4.85% Broward County 3 0.69% Islamorada 95 21.94% Key Largo 55 12.7% Key West 133 30.72% Lower Keys 27 6.24% Marathon 44 10.16% Miami-Dade County 24 5.54% North Key Largo 2 0.46% Orlando Area 2 0.46% Palm Beach County 2 0.46% Stock Island 3 0.69% Tampa Area 1 0.23% Other areas within Florida 4 0.92% https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 3/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Outside of Florida 17 3.93% Question'2: Other The word cloud requires at least 20 answers to show. Response Count Retired 3 Vermont 1 USA on line 1 Upper Keys 1 retire 1 Remote/travel 1 Philippines 1 Northeast Florida 1 North Carolina 1 New York 1 Lakeland, FI 1 Kansas 1 1 work from home, but travel a lot using the Key West Airport 1 Global 1 Georgia 1 Boston 1 Am retired! No option for that 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 4/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 0 Question 3: How will COVID-19 change future travel patterns? Working from home 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 ....... Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 17 3.93% Decrease 21 4.85% Stay the Same 296 68.36% Increase 70 16.17% Increase Greatly 29 6.7% Commuting to Work/School along US-1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 5/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 27 6.24% Decrease 34 7.85% Stay the Same 332 76.67% Increase 31 7.16% Increase Greatly 9 2.08% icycle'riding along the U -1 Corridor/the Overseas Heritage Trail https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 6/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 22 5.08% Decrease 13 3% Stay the Same 291 67.21% Increase 79 18.24% Increase Greatly 28 6.47% Walking along US-1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 7/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 22 5.08% Decrease 17 3.93% Stay the Same 300 69.28% Increase 71 16.4% Increase Greatly 23 5.31% Riding a bus along US-1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 8/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 � Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 61 14.09% Decrease 30 6.93% Stay the Same 314 72.52% Increase 20 4.62% Increase Greatly 8 1.85% Recreational driving along US-1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 9/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 22 5.08% Decrease 53 12.24% Stay the Same 251 57.97% Increase 79 18.24% Increase Greatly 28 6.47% Other motor vehicle trips along US-1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 10/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 150 100 50 4, q1I Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 30 6.93% Decrease 37 8.55% Stay the Same 296 68.36% Increase 52 12.01% Increase Greatly 18 4.16% Iv p�.)d,: { Check here if you did not previously use US-1 for commuting https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 11/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 100 80 60 40 20 0 Chid not previo... Answers Count Percentage Did not previously use US-1 for commuting 98 22.63% Question 4: Is US-1 functioning optimally for your needs? 350 300 : 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No Answers Count Percentage Yes 89 20.55% https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 12/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey No 344 79.45% S As.(4.". ka pp,,,d: tJ Question 5: What types of improvements are most necessary/important? Relieve Congestion/ Improve Traffic Flow 250 200 150 100 50 0 ML IRE 1st 2nd 3rd 4t1i 5th 6th 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 227 52.42% 2nd 106 24.48% 3rd 33 7.62% 4th 22 5.08% 5th 23 5.31% 6th 11 2.54% 7th 11 2.54% 0 Reduce Crashes https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 13/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 200 150 100 50 r 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 173 39.95% 2nd 127 29.33% 3rd 54 12.47% 4th 28 6.47% 5th 19 4.39% 6th 22 5.08% 7th 10 2.31% Traffic Signal Timing https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 14/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 100 80 60 yn � �v 40 20 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 34 7.85% 2nd 47 10.85% 3rd 99 22.86% 4th 60 13.86% 5th 64 14.78% 6th 52 12.01% 7th 77 17.78% Bicycle Facilities (add new or improve existing) https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_9 15/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 100 80 60 '� C� 20 o a CCCCCrr ��� r 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 49 11.32% 2nd 54 12.47% 3rd 77 17.78% 4th 93 21.48% 5th 62 14.32% 6th 54 12.47% 7th 44 10.16% .a . 1 : : 0 Pedestrian Facilities (add new or improve existing) https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_9 16/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 100 mto 80 �,��1� 40, 60 rt , 40 t 20 IICCCrr�i ���� 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 27 6.24% 2nd 34 7.85% 3rd 68 15.7% 4th 95 21.94% 5th 85 19.63% 6th 77 17.78% 7th 47 10.85% „a . : : 0 Bus/Public Transportation (add new or improve existing) https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_1 17/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 120 s rt 100 r> 80 . 60 �iiiiii��S4 �iii�� 40 t 4 20 �.. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 26 6% 2nd 31 7.16% 3rd 59 13.63% 4th 73 16.86% 5th 70 16.17% 6th 112 25.87% 7th 62 14.32% Provide Water Transportation Options https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_9 18/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 200 150 100 50 > > �CCCCCrrf����� r 0 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 25 5.77% 2nd 25 5.77% 3rd 41 9.47% 4th 45 10.39% 5th 51 11.78% 6th 58 13.39% 7th 188 43.42% Please provide any additional details or comments if desired: https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 19/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey poor South cross speeding head rt a Long local ftevs. improve day upper 11mit 35 '4 5:30iota pp turn places time t ra ffic. a ies, travel High area tall TRAFFIC . , US1 21 areas Ken N a p Ipt I), cars 18 't I Oki PEOPLE stop dangerous 3 BAD drivers ton '3s tourls, FOUnders US-1 In MPH 50 toa' R U.S. go trail line Response Count test 2 With the daily crashes it feels(and has always felt)like you're taking your life in your hands driving on 1 the Overseas Highway, especially at night. We avoid it as much as possible. Drunk and distracted driv ing is a huge problem in the Keys. Widen the road to 4 lanes from Florida City to Key West. It is unsafe and totally unsatisfactory to hand 1 le the volume of traffic between Florida City and Key West. During weekends and Holidays it is not un usual to be stuck for 4 or 5 hours in dead traffic. While my office is in Key Largo, I routinely travel as far as Marathon and the Lower Keys for my job. T 1 he bottleneck just south of Coral Shores High School can add up to an hour to my commute time from MM 105 to MM 87. Usually it takes 30-40 minutes. During high season, it can take 90 minutes. That is unconscionable. I think we need to take a look at elevated high-speed rail above the U.S. I corridor to move tourists quickly and easily to their destinations, leaving U.S. 1 as a surface road for locals to mo ve about and do their business. We need public bus service. 1 We need more law enforcement(cars with real people in them)to catch the drivers who speed and w 1 eave in and out of traffic.Another issue is the"slower traffic keep right"signage. Here, we all have to make left turns, and that puts speeders behind us as we are slowing down to turn left to go home,to p ull into restaurants, or to make the u-turns to head in the opposite direction. We need more lanes.This will reduce crashes by impatient passers and help with the traffic flow. 1 We need four lanes from NAS Key West to the turnpike in Florida City. 1 https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/ldc8285cc7444654b6O83al2dl6d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 20/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey We need at center passing lane which alternately allows northbound or southbound traffic to pass wit 1 hout opposing oncoming traffic. We need a traffic light on both ends of college road 1 We don't need a pedestrian bridge at founders park stupidest thing ever you need to expand snake br 1 idge and use money for pedestrian bridge to redo snake creek We do not need stop signs on the Old Hwy. The traffic survey proved it.Also,we do not need a huge 1 cross over at Founders Park.The cost of the structure and the upkeep of 2 elevators are not necessar y. We only have a couple of times a year when we deal with Founders Park events.What's next? Put on at the church because of Art Under the Oaks once a year? We do not need a pedestrian walkway that is only used 2-3 times a year!!! Put a toll in the keys, they 1 need this more than a useless pedestrian cross way, or better yet place it at the high school where tra ffic gets backed up throughout the school year! We desperately need more deterrents to passing. Perhaps the reflective"sticks"that are attached to t 1 he centerline would help.ALL of US 1 through the Keys should be NO PASSING. water transportation should be seriously considered pedestrian and lite vehicle traffic.this will help dur 1 ing all times and in emergency evacuations ! Vacationers for some reason feel like they need to drive up and down the Overseas Highway. It must 1 be a nightmare for people who commute on it. Particularly in the upper keys,there need to be 2 lanes each way to prevent the all too common traffic jams and road closures. US1 Overseas from Stock Island to Key Largo NEEDS TO BE EXPANDED TO AT LEAST 2-LANES 1 EACH DIRECTION--it is extremely dangerous driving on a one-lane highway each direction, especiall y at night. Moreover, a dramatic amount of business and commerce are reduced when business entiti es consider the poor line of communications(transportation infrastructure)to travel in,through, and o ut of the Keys. Expanding US1 Overseas Hwy to two lanes in each direction for th entire stretch of Ke y Largo to Key West is essential. https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 21/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey US1 is very dangerous and has resulted in many fatal crashes. Reducing speed along populated stret 1 ches of US1, and providing safer turning lanes, needs to be a priority. The easiest way to accomplish both of those is to install additional traffic signals. In Key Largo we only have 2 real stop lights and in my area (MM103)people will travel upwards of 60 MPH regularly. Our law enforcement cannot be eve rywhere at once.The easiest way to reduce speeds,which will reduce fatal accidents, is to install addi tional stop lights.This will also allow easier turning opportunities, reducing more fatal crashes, and pr ovide pedestrians with safer routes across the road.A great place for a stoplight would be near the C aribbean Club where pedestrians are often crossing the road at night for parking, and there have bee n quite a few fatal crashes involving turning in this area. Another great place for a stoplight is by Key L argo School-it's already there. Let's make it a normal functioning light. US-1 is far too dangerous a road at present. I would sooner fly into and out of the keys than try driving 1 US-1. US1 is a nightmare! If its not Miami idiots in their rented luxury cars trying to pass us and causing hea 1 d on collisions its people on bikes in the lane. US1 needs a complete overhaul! 1. Widen it a bit with a dedicated bike lane that is separated from actual road traffic. 2. Make all lanes non passing! Except in places like marathon, big pine etc. How many people need to die? 3. Install cameras that identify spe eders!45 does not mean 65. US1 is one of the most dangerous highways, it is terrifying to drive especially at night. 1 US 1 needs repaving in all of Islamorada and the 18 mile stretch 1 US 1 is overcrowded.The frequent changes in speed limit are not necessary. There are not enough p 1 assing or turn lanes.There is no reason for the congestion in Islamorada.There need to be less RV's, boats being hauled, motorcycles. Us 1 is absolutely terrifying to for families to walk/bicycle along on bike path. There needs to be some 1 sort of separation from us 1 and path. There are really zero sufficient crossing areas. It's like playing fr ogger with your family when crossing the road. The congestion has gotten so heavy after Irma it is diff icult to leave the house, especially on weekends. US 1 is a nightmare to drive on. It is way too congested,way too many changes in speed limits, Iimite 1 d opportunities to pass boats, RV's,trailers, etc. US 1 has become a major highway that divides our tiny communities.We need to treat it as though w 1 e live in an urban area(which essentially we do now)and reduce the speed limit, add excellent public transportation option, add traffic control signals, increase safe opportunities to cross, improve the safe ty of the bike trail, encourage more pedestrian and cycling options. Look to Scandinavia to see how ur ban (and rural)areas can develop safe bicycle communities. A hard shoulder is NOT a bicycle lane. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 22/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Urgent need to control/decrease daytrippers from the mainland !!! 1 Turning lanes... going south hard to turn left Going north hard to turn left Have to wait for long lines of 1 traffic Turn lane needed between on Ramrod by Coral Ave! Please!!! 1 Traffic/congestion is primary concern resulting in crashes, and interferes with buses, manual transport 1 ation:walking/biking. Our Keys cannot handle more traffic.And being a marine sanctuary, don't even consider water transportation as it would be suicidal to our already endangered environment. Heavy t oils and limited entry to the Keys should help with traffic. Either Keep the Keys livable or turn it into th e mainland,which is what we all don't want. Traffic, congestion, speeding, crashes have all significantly increased in the keys in the last 9 years 1 1 have lived here.We own a business in Key Largo and have an active interest in the community. We c annot continue to sustain the influx without improvements. Traffic signal timing is terrible. Was hit on my scooter because of it.Also, scooters do not have enoug 1 h metal to trigger the magnet, so signals need to use a different system to work usefully. Also, please create four lanes, passing zones, and sister bridges(like at bahia honda) Traffic on holidays. Storhe old Road merge nightmare 1 Traffic in Islamorada is horrible.The pedestrian bridge at Founders Park will not help the traffic proble 1 m and is a waste of money. Traffic congestion in Key Largo on weekends makes homeowners hostages at home.The traffic back 1 ups heading into the Keys are horrific. I was on the mainland Saturday of Labor Day weekend. I was r eturning to my home in Key Largo that Saturday morning. From mile 5 on the Florida Turnpike to my h ouse at mm 105 on US 1 took an hour!!! The 18 mile stretch was a parking lot at 11am. Completely un acceptable. Traffic always builds at jet ski beach on the 18 mile stretch. Maybe put a wall so people can't see the 1 people on the sandbar so they don't slow down. Too much traffic for the roadway 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 23/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Too many people use the shoulder of the road (between the white lane line and the bike path)as a de 1 celeration/turn off lane. I think there should be more right-turn turn off lanes because people pull over and decelerate on the shoulder anyways. Some drivers honk at you if you slow down in the correct la ne and don't voluntarily pull into the shoulder. I often see drivers get dangerously close to pedestrians and cyclists using the bike path. I love the FDOT beautification plan but the vegetation does block vie w of pedestrians and cyclists when trying to enter US1 by car at some locations. Clear sight triangles are blocked and could be improved with some better trimming or relocation of some landscaping. Ticket people for passing in the center lane. Eliminate the old road as a way to buck traffic. 1 This is a scenic, albeit rural, highway.There is absolutely no logical reason why the speed limit is so 1 1 ow in most areas. That, unto itself, is a hazard. US 1,thru downtown Ft. Lauderdale, is 45 mph yet thr u vast sections of nothingness, down the Keys, it's only 45. Makes zero sense. Locals have to deal wi th rubbernecking tourists already. Raise the limit to lower the frustration and increase the flow. The 18 mile stretch should be 75 mph. The bulk of US 1 (not thru a town/village)should be 60 to 65 mph. Tur n lanes are needed in more areas. That stupid park in Islamorada is the bane of us all. It should NOT take 5+ hours to reach the mainland but more often than not it does. If nobody is going to spend mon ey to build a new train (and nobody is)then be sensible about how to better the road. Lastly, put a toll in place. There's zero logical reasoning as to why the road can't pay for itself via visitor tolls. Resident s could even pay a very nominal toll. They are always bottlenecks in Homestead getting on to US1 and Islamorada. Need a solution 1 There needs to be relilable regular public transportation between all of the Keys and between the Key 1 s and the mainland-at least to Dadeland where you can easily connect with other public transportatio n or shop. There needs to be more done about drivers passing on bridges, people passing in no pass zones, an 1 d passing in turning lanes. Some times on my drive to and from work I am disgusted with what drivers get away with down here! There needs to be better control/enforcement of speeding ,reckless driving and crazy passing.Alot of 1 visitors are endangering everyone to get to Key West as fast as they can. There is a need for a crosswalk at CocoPlum Drive/US1 intersection in Marathon. Heritage Trail comp 1 Ietion. The triangle is absolutely terrible entering key west 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 24/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey The timing of lights mostly is what ccntrols the flow of traffic.A better design of the triangle at the entr 1 ance into Key West should be studied. In addition,whoever thought the location of the pedestrian cro sswalks on N. Roosevelt Blvd should be fired! They are poorly located, one directly around a curve by the Gates hotel is terrible dangerous as well as the one,west of Eisenhower, 50 yards from the ligh t?!? really?That crosswalk in front of the HomeDepot should be REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!! The thing that would help traffic flow the most is more 2 lane roads/bridges. 1 the suicide lane is terrifying 1 The stretch should be four lanes. If we want to continue the traffic delays to reduce day trippers, incre 1 ase fuel costs and pollute our air, at least give us two lanes outbound.That is a safety issue. The stretch needs to be two lanes in both directions for everywhere feasible, and the potholes need to 1 be repaired.Another red light or two needs to be added in Islamorada in order to allow traffic to enter Hwy 1, e.g. at Publix. The additional STOP signs need to be removed from The Old Hwy.These STO P signs just impede traffic flow. The signs that say SLOW TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT need to go.We have to make many left turns to go 1 home, to go to work, etc.We can be expected to zoom into the left lane of speeding traffic and then sl ow down to make the turn. US1 is NOT an interstate. The public transit system as it exists is useless for professionals that live in the lower keys and work 1 M-F, 8-5 jobs in Marathon or Key West. The current schedule forces you to either arrive to those empl oyment centers around 7 am or after 9 am, and to depart at 6 pm. It is much more efficient to just driv e. If buses arrived every 30 minutes between the hours of 8 and 9, and departed between 4:30 and 5: 30 or so, I think more professionals would take advantage of the bus system. The proposed pedestrian pedestrian bridge at Founders park is an embarrassment. Only the governm 1 ent could make something simple into this monstrosity The pedestrian bridge at Founders Park is a collassal waste of our taxpayers money!We don't need it 1 there!We need it by the high/elementary schools further north at mm 90 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 25/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey The only way to relieve traffic congestion is to provide alternative methods for LOCALS to get from pla 1 ce to place.There needs to be a public transportation system that works and is put in place for years so that locals can incorporate it into their daily routines. Buses come and go too quickly for adoption. Also,figure out how to let locals use golf carts, electric bikes on the bike paths. Make speed bumps o n side streets before the bike path so drivers know to stop instead rolling into the bike path without loo king. Have express busses going from island to island and connecting busses doing the local stops o n each island. Businesses wouldn't need so much parking if the employees could rely on public transp ort.Also, it would give those who don't drive a way to get to stores and doctors appointments. The tou rists will always drive.This system should work for locals. Preferably with busses or trolleys that are n of disgusting. The number of high-speed, head-on, passing ... especially on bridges has increased significantly. I am 1 making an assumption that these are day-trippers and weekenders much of the time based on the da y of week and time of day(which I now try to avoid). I have at least one dangerous encounter weekly with a head-on car passing in the oncoming lane. I drive no more than the speed limit. If I were a regul ar speeder, one or more of these incidents would have a high likelihood of ending in a crash. TIME F OR A$25 TOLL at KEY LARGO and another$25 toll on BIG PINE for all non-residents. Tourists pay f ees to arrive by air...why not by car? The new pedestrian crosswalk lights on US1 in the city of Key West are a colossal failure.Tourists do 1 not understand what the flashing red light means and don't stop.This is going to continue to cause m ore accidents. For traffic flow, there should be a minimum amount of time between light activations. A s it is now, someone can cross and before it's back to regular it is activating for the next person to cro ss... grid locking North Roosevelt Blvd. The landscaping in the medium has created a blockage of the opposite side of the road in Key Largo. 1 This is a problem because people can't see where they want to go until they are right up on it and the y make left-hand turns from the right lane this in turn causes accidents The keys are clearly over capacity.The County needs to stop approval of new residential projects. Th 1 e County needs to"take back"the TDC and repurpose it to better serve the community at large. Devel opment and tourism have taken over to the point where safety on US 1 is now a real concern. People need to be discouraged from "day tripping"from Dade/Broward for example. We need more disincen tives to take rental cars and such down the road. The Market cannot be the deciding force anymore, we need control and regulation to manage US 1. A water taxi is the dumbest idea anyone has come u p with. There is already a ferry that runs out of Ft Myers. That's enough. The fragmentation of the bike pedestrian path is atrocious. The path appears and disappears random) 1 y. It should be continuous the entire length of the keys. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 26/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey The flow of traffic getting out of the driveway makes us wait at times over 20mins. When one direction 1 is clear the other is not. The emphasis should consider all potential policies to reduce vehicle miles travelled We need less car 1 s and more alternative transportation The drawbridge is not the problem. Sometimes it's a blessing because it's the only time you can get a 1 cross the road. The crosswalk at mm100 should be discontinued &a traffic light installed at intersection of US1 & Lag 1 una Dr with crosswalk there. It kills 2 birds with one stone. There's heavy traffic there with cars turning in multiple directions. A wreck happens almost every time I'm there. The county or DOT are not maintaining egress for bikes or pedestrians. The bike"lane" has caused n 1 umerous accidents due to the numerous pot holes that have been there for years.Additionally,the Iitt er is unacceptable-items ranging from work tools to glass and other debris The congestion on us 1 is a serious issue. The main problem is one lane in each direction thru islamo 1 rada. It used to just be an issue for holiday weekends. It's now every weekend. On Sunday afternoons it takes me over an hour to drive home. This is normally a 20 minute drive. The congestion in Islamorada must be addressed around the Snake Creek Bridge to Founders Park. 1 The pedestrian overpass is a good start. The second thing that should be done is to move the truck w eigh station back to where US1 is split with land in between the north and south lanes. Put the weigh station in the middle of the highway. It will make it easier for trucks using the station as well as for oth er vehicles, bikes and pedestrians. It will also get the trucks entering and exiting the station away from the bridge and traffic congestion. The arrows in the median are confusing to tourists and direct those entering to stay left vs. right like e 1 verywhere else and so that you can see to move past incoming traffic.The light at the top of the stretc h near Cirlce K and 905 encourages accidents and crossing in front of one another, it is very dangero us. The merge lanes on the 18 mile stretch are being used for passing zones and is very dangerous. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 27/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Thanks for this opportunity to express my concerns. I am a Captain for American Airlines. I have hit th 1 e pavement because of trash and lack of maintenance along US1. The concern for cyclists safety is b orderline criminal along US1.As I drive along US1 to MIA airport, I see motorists either drunk or on ce II phones, habitually migrate into the bike lane. CHATTER-BLOCKS should be along the full length of US1. In many areas, SAFE EGRESS is not provided. MM16 is a good example the"BIKE LANE END S"sign is abrupt, confusing and nonsensical. The Heritage Trail is in places world class wonderful.An d in many places cluttered with debris,trash and poorly maintained. Mixed use bridges, with fishing, is a disastrous territorial battle. Poles and hooks inadvertently and with purpose flung into my path. Cycli st safety's an oxymoron With No apparent Short term or long term solution. I am willing to assist in ma king cycling safety a high priority. Before the next fatality. . Survey does not provide for those that are retired. Need N/A options Need to address rising tides 1 Summerland Key needs sidewalk added from existing walk(Carribean Dr)going West to Boy Scout C 1 amp. at Kemp Bridge Stop the passing in no pass zones and speeding. 1 Speeding is a huge issue. Especially with people leaving the keys at the end of a work day. Residents 1 need to slow down to turn into neighborhoods but it always seems like the person behind you can't be bothered to slow down and would rather risk an accident to change lanes. Speeding &reckless driving are rampant on US1 &the"blue bridge". It's quite frightening to drive on 1 US1. Something needs to be done about bicyclists riding on Rt 1 in the heavy traffic areas(Marathon). The 1 y ride 2, 3,4 or more abreast impeding traffic and causing major safety hazard. Make rules for bicyclis t they must follow, includes riding SINGLE FILE. Widening sidewalks for cyclist lanes off Rt1. Put on more traffic officers to issue tickets for the out of state speeders and idiot reckless drivers that unfortu nately vacation here. Install some'RADAR IN USE'signs which might help slow down some idiot driv ers.Add more turn and thru lanes.Additional pull off areas like one on the Grassy Key stretch. Signs, large enough signs station'DO NOT STOP ON BRIDGE'or'NO PICTURE TAKING FROM BRIDGE (or you will be pushed over the side ...just kidding ... maybe)'something like.that for the morons that stop in the middle of them.Add the flashing 'your speed'indicator signs along the race track areas of Rt.1 like was just added in Marathon before the new School and Library area. some areas of us1 needs repaved like between where past boomdocks to summerland key and 18 mi 1 le stretch some places along that road https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 28/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Signage and barriers in areas where tourists constantly pull off and recreate are greatly needed.Also, 1 1 feel that we should put up more signage regarding speeding, passing illegally, etc. U.S.1 is very scar y to drive on, because people think they can speed, pass illegally, drive in center lane, ignore turn Ian es, etc,whatever they want. I think signage such as"Slow down,you're already here", "What's your h urry, you're on vacation"and things of that nature would be helpful in a positive way, without"threateni ng"people. Safety, safety, safety. 1 Roadways-especially bridges-are not cleaned. So many bicyclists get flat tires because of all the de 1 bris. Look at the shoulder on the Seven Mile Bridge(or any bridge) next time you drive on it. One big area of congestion is always near Lake Surprise on the stretch. It seems cars slow down to look at the boats? It's always backed up there, on either side,for no apparent reason. Perhaps put up something (fencing that isn't see-through?)to obscure the view from the road. Riding a bicycle along US 1 is terrifying. I only do it to get where I need to go to ride on streets with Iittl 1 e traffic. That being said, people do not look when turning into or out of a business; so education to dri vers to watch for bicyclists would be helpful.Also, traffic light timing, especially entering Key West wo uld undoubtedly help with traffic congestion, as well as light timing within the city. Replace Snake Creek Bridge (roughly mm85). The pile-up's eventually stack and during season it can 1 cause delays of more than an hour during season. Relieve congestion at locations of attractive nuisances such as Robbies on Lower Matecumbe 1 Regarding reducing crashes, as long as we have South Florida drivers bringing their international disr 1 egard for safe vehicular behavior and machismo into the Keys, other than law enforcement being on t he spot to catch them, I don't see how we can change this dangerous behavior and protect our safe m otorists. I also think if there was more patrolling and ticketing of people driving UNDER the speed limit for long lengths of US 1 where passing is not an option,there would be fewer conflicts. I also always wonder if encouraging cruise control at the sped limit would stop the jackrabbit syndrome of sometime s going 35 and sometimes 49 in a 45 mph zone would help traffic flow. I have never seen a "use cruis e control sign" but think this is a great idea. Reduce sign pollution, ie the"Slower traffic use right lane"signs on Stock Island should be removed. 1 People will be in right or left lane depending on where they are going. Reduce day trippers from outside Florida Keys!!! 1 Rear end crashes seem the most likely issue 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 29/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Provide ways other than renting a car to travel to and around the Keys for tourists and seasonal com 1 muters, residents etc. Flagler had a vision back in the day,sadly buried and forgotten. Protected bike lanes are necessary on the Overseas Hwy. 1 Prevent head on crashes by installing barriers, especially on 7 mile bridge. 1 Please see my project comments on "Facebook Comment Section"attached to survey. (Valerie Hand 1 elsman) Please make US 1 safer with regards to head on accidents and passing in the turning lanes in the upp 1 er keys(specifically mm 81-74) Please install a sign at the TOP of the stretch informing drivers of the"real time"trafffic into the Keys. 1 Please reinstate the V of deaths on US 1 sign Please consider buying out billboards and removing them. They are a distraction and sully the appear 1 ance of our scenic highway. Please 4 lanes the parts of US 1 where you can. Or at least add a second bridge next to existing bridg 1 es it would make maintenance of bridges easier and safer. If one bridge goes down we are trapped. H ave a backup bridge, Like at Bahia Honda If not 4 lanes then add an additional turning lane down the middle of the road to do traffic shifts during an accident instead of shutting down the highway. Plantation key headed south from Tavernier is a disaster!!! 2 lanes to 1. Bad. Also snake creek bridge 1 must be adddressed Planning for the highway to adequately support years of foolhardy growth has been atrocious. US1 sh 1 ould be 4 lanes throughout the Keys. There should be long-term planning to widen the roadbed and r eplace inadequate two-lane bridges, including the 7 Mile. It is long past time for the drawbridge to be r etired.All businesses should be removed from the median immediately south of Key Largo due to con stant and consistent near-miss accidents. Place a pedestrian bridge in Islamorada, create a local bypass of U.S. 1 on Big Pine Key or a reverse 1 flow lane for local travel. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 30/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey People constantly biking right on US1 when there is a trail they can use: due to not enough signage fo 1 r it(tourists don't know)and also easy access to it. I believe every street that comes out on US1 oppo site the trail should have a (simple is fine)access point. Doesn't have to be expensive,just walkable. Example mile marker 22 area, can't get to trail due to water retention area...it should be filled at one e nd and cleared so that people can get in to the trail. Curve nearby makes walking or biking along US1 at that point very dangerous. Similar situations elsewhere.Also need wider shoulder so cars whipping by at these intersections don't back-end crash into people. Would make highway much safer. Such is also needed at MM22 area.Thank you. Pedestrian Bridge in Islamorada at Founders Park is not needed! 1 Pedestrian and bicycle improvements should be prioritized over any traffic improvements, because pe 1 ople will travel shorter distances and it is ecologically much sounder. Passing lanes would be nice maybe from the stretch in mattacumbe upper or lower And down to key 1 west one passing lane would be nice Our rush hours are different then in the City.After check out time 11 am to dinner time in peak season 1 you will always need and extra 30 minutes(without an accident). 20+years here... I always try to acc omplish my errands/appointments around that. How amazing if we had water taxi service! On Big Pine, connect roads off Rt 1 so we can get around without having to use Rt 1. Create more tur 1 n lanes in and out of major communities. Normal traffic is now averaging 55-60mpg in Key Largo. This is causing accidents to be more severe 1 and creates more of a superhighway feeling.Also with the amount of truck traffic, US1 would flow bett er if slower traffic stayed in right lane, including all trucks. No pedi bridge at Founders Park. 1 No bridge at founders park 1 Need two lanes all through the Keys to minimize congestion. More direct flights. 1 Need to provide safe cycling egress 1 Need to provide better bike and pedestrian paths currently very dangerous 1 Need long term strategic plan the in. This plan would include light rail/monorail from FL City to Key W 1 est with parking facility in Florida City. Local transport would be electric and free with tips highly encou raged Reducing vehicle entry into the keys and provides the only real solution. Need increased law enforcement!!! 1 https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 31/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Need better boat ramps, truck and trailer parking, and ramp facilities. 1 MY BUSINESS REQUIRES ME TO TRAVEL THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE KEYS, NO OPTION ABO 1 VE FOR THAT IN QUESTION 2 .... RELIEVE THE CONGESTION IN ISLAMORADA AND UPPER K EYS BY ADDING EXPRESS LANE IN CENTER. INCREASE SPEED LIMITS IN NON RESIDENTIAL AREAS. More turning lanes, businesses should be required to keep plants trimmed away from signs to make 1 more visible More traffic lights at important corners 1 More traffic enforcement and greater safety for pedestrians and cyclists. 1 more real time traffic cams to target bad drivers. Can send traffic ticket if driver is shown speeding or 1 passing incorrectly. Can alert police in advance. More public transport is needed locally in the keys. NOT from Homestead/Miami. Just FL Keys worker 1 s who work in the keys. More public rest facilities. More passing areas. Signs encouraging folks going slow to pull off to the si 1 de to let folks pass them or if picture taking, pull off. The addition of more rest stops will also encourag e this. Make signage saying it is picturesque More law enforcement officers are needed to enforce the speed limit. I have trouble turning into or out 1 of my neighborhood because drivers are constantly doing 55-65mph through Key Largo.They get righ t on your tail refusing to brake as you slow down to turn off. It feels like you have to take the turn on tw o wheels otherwise they will rear end you. I don't allow my children on the bike path because I am terr ified of vehicles running off the road. More electric busses and courtesy vans and less personal vehicles Better control of independent and 1 private company large trucks Make US1 a four lane highway from Florida City to Key West. 1 Make US1 4 lanes(2 north 2 south)plus designated turning lanes and include a bike path on both sid 1 es throughout Islamorada. Improve street lighting throughout upper and lower mat. Lower speed limit t hrough upper mat to 35mph. Make US 1 4 lanes were possible. 1 Make rt 1 from Florida City to Key Largo all 2 Lane! 1 Maintain speed limit to 55 mph throughout US1. Changing speeds causes congestion. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 32/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Local Law enforcement needs to enforce speed limits. It is absolutely ridiculous the speeds 10-20 ove 1 r that most people are going including large commercial trucks and buses. Tourists then just think it's t he norm. Traffic enforcement needs to be increased. Living on Cudjoe the bicycle lanes are very limited. Would love the paths to connect all along the Iowe 1 r keys so that I could do a long cycling trip without having to cycle on roads. For example when I cycle from Cudjoe to Summerland, I can't cycle any further. On the next bridge north,the cycle lane is close d off. If this was repaired it would really open up more cycling options. Limit the number of cars entering to road design limits. 1 Let's not build the pedestrian bridge and move the flea market north or south 1 LEO needs to REALLY step up speed limit enforcement. 1 Keys has been built out for years and has too many resorts. 1 Key West and the Florida Keys are some of the most beautiful places to ride your bicycle in the countr 1 y yet also one of the most dangerous. Bike lanes and paths abruptly stop in some areas, electric vehi cles(such as electric bicycles) have flooded bicycle/pedestrian paths going at high speeds causing fe ar in local riders safety, and the automobile/bicycle culture is as hostile as anywhere else I've riden in t he country. The physical layout of how a bicyclist moves through the keys as well as the relationship b etween automobiles and bicyclist needs major improvement. Keep the bike path clear, at times they're a mess and hard to ride on 1 It would be nice if we could go to the grocery store, Dr without fear of some one going 90 miles an ho 1 ur crashing into us. Maybe a lot of stop lights as stop signs mean nothing to a lot of people. Islamorada is the area where most traffic congestion occurs at all hours. It is the inly area where wxpa 1 nsion is possible to a 2-lane highway, but has not been done. Intersection at Burton Drive and US 1 is dangerous and needs a light. 1 In order to reduce traffic, one idea is to improve the bike path/lane. Currently, its not safe in many are 1 as. The path/lane has big holes and ends abruptly in places.Also its a very narrow bike lane and cars and trucks easily migrate into the bike lane without even noticing it. Please work to improve this area, we have people who only have a bike and they should be safe. Thank you! Improving the bicycle path will reduce traffic on the main road. Currently from Key West one can only 1 ride as far as Baby's Coffee without getting onto the highway to connect the entire Lower Keys. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 33/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Improve pedestrian crosswalks and signage in Marathon, especially at Overseas Highway and Sombr 1 ero Beach Road. Install signage on northbound Overseas Highway and Sombrero Beach Road at the traffic signal indicating that the far right lane is"right turn only, many drivers race ahead there in order merge in to right lane before the road narrows. I've had many near misses there and witnessed many close calls, especially with vehicles attempting to exit the K-Mart/Winn Dixie parking lot. Improve bottlenecks on US 1 1 I'm in North Key Largo and something needs to be done about the northbound traffic speeding at KLS 1 right after the light. Once vehicles pass the police officers in the median,they speed up before the bus entrance/exit area.This is hazardous for the bus drivers and the cars that use this entrance to the sch 001. If the flow is improved,with the timing of the one and only light giving sufficient time to cross streets a 1 nd for local traffic to enter and leave US1 for work travel,the accidents will decrease. Leaving the light on US1 at the control of one police officer is absurd. They get on their cell phone and lose track of the time, I have personally sat for 12 minutes during high season waiting for him to switch the light to let t he workers enter US1 while tourist traffic heading to Key West moves un-impeded. Bicyclists and ped estrians have to run between vehicles to cross to get to work and school. I'm AGAINST the Pedestrian Bridge project at mm87 at Founders Park. It is a waste of taxpayer mon 1 ey. I would use water taxi/ferry to Key West from Islamorada. I would use water taxi to Upper Matecumbe 1 from Plantation Key. I would like to see traffic light at Woods Ave and US1 at CSHS active on weeken ds/holidays. Instead of building pedestrian over the road crossing at Founder's why doesn't FDOT just add crosswalk like at Key Largo school? I would rate improvements for pedestrians, bikes and public transportation equally-they all need impr 1 ovement. Overseas Highway needs to be made safer for all modes of transport. Water transport is rea Ily not a good idea. It creates further ecological stress on our aquatic environments. I would like to see the traffic light at Woods Ave-CSHS activated during the weekends. It is very diffic 1 ult to get on US1 southbound from the old highway. I would like to see an electric high speed rail system form Miami to Key West make it cheaper to ride t 1 han to drive. Searstown will make a good place to have the ending station. I will NEVER leave my car up the Keys and boat/bike/bus et al into town. I need my car for meeting th 1 roughout the day and to go grocery shopping in the evenings. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 34/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey I think we should add a toll booth on the stretch as long as Monroe County gets a fair share of the rev 1 enue. It would be helpful if MC residents got a discount or rebate. I think there should be more de-acceleration turn lanes added in Tavernier 1 1 think the pedestrian walkway is a waste of money n time... 1 1 ride my bike every day and there are several spots that are not the safest. I would like to see some 1 more rather expedient but affordable options to get from the lower keys to Key West besides driving. I would like to head down more, but with a DID ;) I live on the Old Road, MM 81, and it would be helpful if the road was patrolled by the sheriff's depart 1 ment on the weekends when heavy traffic can be predicted. It is unfortunate that I do not leave my ho me on these busy weekends because pulling out of my driveway is hazardous. I do not think that installing a Pedestrian Bridge will improve anything, is not warranted or needed. 1 1 could easily bike to work in Marathon; however, I often choose not to because to do so most safely 1 (using the wider bike path on the bayside)requires I cross US 1 at Sombrero Beach Road and,frank) y,that intersection scares me in a car and terrifies me on a bicycle.This is also the case for recreation al use of my bicycle.Also, there is a huge community park in Marathon and the only safe crossing of t his 4-5 lane HIGHWAY, is west at the 33rd street light or a mile back at that lovely Sombrero intersecti on.A crosswalk and signal on the West side of the US1 Sombrero Road intersection; a Wider path on BOTH sides of the highway, on demand crossing lights/more pedestrian crossing or even pedestrian bridges would all be helpful! I believe if the county and city invested in a rail system we would see a dramatic decrease in fatal acci 1 dents, less drivers on the road.And a robust tourism program for the keys. I am the MCSD Director of ESE, Special Olympics Chair, LKHB Chairwoman and a cyclist. There is a 1 big problem of safe egress with the current bike lane on US1. I am not sure if the sub contractors DO T uses are the culprits, however,there are major hazards in the bike lane from 7 Mile Bridge to Stock Island. I have seen three inch gouges in the bike lane that are often unavoidable. I have shared my co ncerns for several years now with Ms. Summers and other DOT staff, all in writing.Additionally, I am r equesting the addition of sleeper bumps to be installed adjacent to the bike path in all areas. I was tol d that"they can only be installed in areas that are 55+ MPH',which is inaccurate,they are currently e xist in many areas such as Big Pine where the speed limit is just 35 MPH.The sleeper bumps would k eep cyclists safe as so many distracted drivers drift fully into the bike lane . My name is Dr. Lesley Th ompson drleselythompson@gmail.com please feel free to contact me anytime. I am against the proposed pedestrian bridge development plan. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 35/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey I am a cyclist. The keys are a world class destination, because of the weather to cycle. We are a 4th 1 world country interms of safety for cyclists. US-1 is a fatality waiting to happen for cyclists daily. LEt's put safety first for all of our citizens and guest who seek safety and cycling at the same time. Heritage trail should be completed all along US-1 to alleviate required usage of narrow bike lane on th 1 e highway for cyclists where the trail does not exist, especially from Cudjoe Key south to Bay Point. Hello,we have a lovely cycling path, however, it is in terrible shape and down right dangerous. A frien 1 d of mine was life flighted from a crash, last year,that happened on Summerland Key ON The Bike P ath-that is unacceptable, the hole remains to this day.Additionally, the bumps on the white line are h elpful so that drivers don't drift into the bike lane, however, they are only in certain areas, with no rhym e or reason. They are in Big Coppit where the speed limit is 45, but none where the speed limit is 55? They need to be anywhere there is a bike path exists. Lastly,who is responsible to clear garbage from the path and bridges, they are also a hazard. Thank you for taking the time to consider our opinions! Get the bike/Pedestrian bridges/sidewalks open throughout the keys. No reason to have the gates clo 1 sed on all these bridges. Footbridge at Founders Park mm87 is a waste of tax payer money&will not improve traffic flow. 1 Fix the lanes in Islamorada starting southbound past Coral Shores and extending to Snake Creek brid 1 ge. Badly rutted. Finish the bike path and connect all of the keys. 1 Finding a way to limit the casual local (Miami)visits by car. Water or smaller buses with less stops 1 Ferry port transportation to carry bikes, mopeds and golf carts with passengers to&from other Keys t 1 o Key West Express lane type bypasses in congested areas would be ultimate goal. Section between Gilbert's an 1 d Manatee Bay Marine has a section of open water where boats anchor on weekends.Traffic backs u p due to rubber necker delays on this section. Shrubs or a wall would improve this drastically. Enforcing traffic laws would help a lot! I have been told by deputies they are NOT allowed to pull a ve 1 hicle over unless they are doing at least 10 mph over the posted speed limit. So the actual speed limit is 10 mph over what is posted and everyone knows it. Driving through Key Largo where people are try ing to pull into traffic, trying to turn into a business or pedestrians trying to cross is dangerous. The sp eed limit should be lowered to 35 in the downtown area and the deputies should be allowed to stop ve hicles when they break the law, not wait until they are 10 mph over. That's almost like saying"You can not batter you spouse but if you want to slap her upside the head once in a while we are good with th at," https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 36/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Encourage slower drivers to travel in the right lane. 1 Eliminate private cars in downtown Key West 1 Doing any of the last 5 on the list will lead to an marked improvement of the first two on the list. I wish 1 we had pedestrian bridges over US1! Or more traffic lights where needed---like on the Southwest end of Marathon where there are restaurants and resorts. A light at or near Tranquility Bay and/or the Hyat t?The speed limit is only 35 there, you might as well add a couple lights and save some pedestrians li ves. Always see pedestrians darting through traffic to get to Juice Paradise and Tom Thumb from Tra nquility Bay. Stressful for vacationers and locals!Also, I would like a bike/pedestrian path. I think it's u nreasonable to expect bicycles to go in a regular traffic lanes on US 1 in towns. I would do that if I wa nted to commit suicide!!! Also PLEASE, a decent walking path from the hospital to the 7 mile bridge. B oth sides. Ocean side looks HORRIBLE and and has no path. Very dusty and dirty. Bayside has one f or the most part. Grateful for that! Divider barriers needed to prevent passing. Many more traffic lights to slow traffic. Cameras to catch o 1 ffenders. More traffic enforcement. More no passing zones. Eliminate passing zones. Barriers around turn lanes. Traffic lights at turn lanes. Reduce speed limits. Tourist traffic needs to be slowed,forced t o stop and not allowed to pass. Ideally, a limited access roadway over the WATER for tourists,workin g US1 to be a local resident road. Decide if US1 will be prioritized as a conduit for tourist traffic between Miami and Key West, or is it a 1 1 ocal road for traffic circulation among Keys residents. I am a resident. I want safe ingress and egress between local roads and US1. Cycling so dangerous with driveways. Need signs that say"watch for Pedestrians&Bikes" at drivewa 1 ys along US1 The stretch is a mess with potholes!! Need something on stretch to block view of open water after second passing zone and after the curve (heading south)where tourists slow down to take pictures. This is the first view they have of open water as they head down to the keys and they slow to take pictures, backing the stretch up. Maybe plant some tall trees...please! Consistency saves lives. Some places have rumble straps and others round bumps. Long key bridge 1 has bumps on center line and shoulder. Ohio key has rumble grooves on shoulder and center line but many many other areas don't have anything or only on shoulder.Tourist look at the water and get distr acted. We must have Consistency of putting rumble grooves from Key Largo to Key West to save live S. Clean debris from the side of the road for safer bicycle travel. Use a street sweeper to reduce flats an 1 d potential falls into oncoming traffic. The bike lanes are terribly maintained https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 37/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Cars and bikes and scooters sharing the roads is a bad mix. Need to either create store are lanes or r 1 estrict them from main roads.The whole downtown area is dangerous for everyone. My suggestion is no cars in the whole Duvall tourist area. Can a toll be added to enter the keys? 1 Buses need to run frequently and 365 days a year. 1 Build a new ferry ports in Key Largo, Islamorada, Marathon, Big Pine and Key West. Utilize separate 1 vessels for seasonal traffic and commercial carriers. Build a high speed rail from Miami to key west 1 Biking must be top priority.Add flashing light at cross overs and elevate crossovers slow people down 1 this is the deadly highway in America Bicyclists are often a menace. I feel they should be required to use bike paths wherever they are avail 1 able. Bicyclists often infringe on travel lanes in areas where dedicated bike pats are in plain sight. better sidewalk markings, need safer way to walk or bike over bridges. bike bath is in poor condition. 1 Additional aggressive driver enforcement. better turn lanes. add local bus/trolley,water taxi. Almost all my driving is done in Big Pine Key. Trying to navigates out of the post office is terrible. Waiti 1 ng for a light to turn onto u.s.1 from key deer is too long. We need a cross island road!! Add turn lanes in Islamorada, Fix the US1 between MM 106-116 (Pot holes everywhere, destroying c 1 ars and making people drive recklessly) Add a toll to improve roads 1 Add a toll on 18 mile stretch 1 Add a toll at the beginning of the stretch for all non Iocals.That will help alleviate traffic concerns. 1 2 lanes from the 113 to key west. Removal of the trees from the median and right away for better view 1 ing of oncomming traffic. 1. Signs reminding tourist that they don't own the road and please proceed at the posted speed limit, 1 not 20 MPH under the speed limit. 2. Have the police enforce traffic obstructors. 3.Yes its a beautiful view. Please drive the speed limit. NOT slower. 4. How about a separate road for the tourists https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 38/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 1)DISTRICT 6 PROVIDES NIL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS(SIGNALIZATION AND SPEED LIMIT) DAIL 1 Y/WEEKLY ASSISTANCE. NEED ASSIGNED PERSONNEL IN MARATHON. 2)TRAFFIC OPERATI ONS(SIGNING&MARKING)CONSISTANCY IS HORRIBLE FOR ENTIRE SR5. (DRIVE AT 0200-0 500 TO SEE HOW BAD SIGNING AND MARKING IS.)3) HIGH PEOPLE DENSITY AREAS NEED P EDESTRIAN FACILITIES CONSIDERATIONS. 4)COUNTY COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION CO MMITTEE NEEDS TO BE CONSULTED/COORDINATED AS TO WATER TRANSPORTATION Additional safe passing areas need to be added. There is sufficient land on many of the lower Keys isl 1 ands to add a third lane to improve passing capabilities around slower vehicles. Sea level rise and elevating roadways in the next 10-15 years should be included as a concern to be 1 addressed now, not 20 years from now. High priority Congestion in Islamorada and accidents on US 1 are a huge concern. 0 Question 6: What modes of transportation do you currently use? Automobile 400 300 200 100 0 1 St 211d 3rd 4th 5th Answers Count Percentage 1 st 371 85.68% 2nd 26 6% https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_1 39/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 3rd 20 4.62% 4th 10 2.31% 5th 6 1.39% Skipped: 0 Bicycle 200 150 100 i C 50 1 St 2rid 3rd 4th 5th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 43 9.93% 2nd 171 39.49% 3rd 119 27.48% 4th 47 10.85% 5th 53 12.24% 433 0 Walking https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 40/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 200 150 100 50 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII , 0 1 St 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 23 5.31% 2nd 160 36.95% 3rd 179 41.34% 4th 39 9.01% 5th 32 7.39% Bus https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 41/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 250 200 (CCCCCtfs ��,Y 150 100 "4 rtf ��IIIIIi4444 50 � — 0 SLIM .. IIIIIIIIIII�z 1 St 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Answers Count Percentage 1 St 8 1.85% 2nd 11 2.54% 3rd 32 7.39% 4th 151 34.87% 5th 231 53.35% Other https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 42/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 3 150 100 50 1 St 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Answers Count Percentage 1st 16 3.7% 2nd 29 6.7% 3rd 32 7.39% 4th 103 23.79% 5th 253 58.43% Other: https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 43/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey carpooling fly cnvssrug 6,rj)u N kanor",*" Flying abandoned h'In"'e"d Occasionally retraced "1011har Ligall entrain stay truck reducing lillemnNe rides J'� Sled DINOL, "On, air lowet Ce prarrucal. r�,, neighbors WATER 118 wer/privale hike. cab bicycles add Carl car West d8ogerous H, Iffimuls 1 Siberian GOB hofit slop U Vehicles aftetualive. , I ��"1% Transportation results. Hirell Put I log 111,11,101or C VC, public I u,1, ;� running III earpoel lightsisscante-Umater fain€iLivery deal US-1 Islainerada fronsporlaflon. Freebee requires RICVCle weekends issue braila West; applicable Friends 1818"'d Response Count Boat 31 Scooter 9 Motorcycle 9 None 4 na 4 N/a 4 Car pool 4 vessel 2 Ulger 2 test 2 Lyft 2 Golf Cart 2 Carpool 2 would use a commuter train to the mainland if one existed. 1 https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/ldc8285cc7444654b6O83al2dl6d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 44/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Where is focus on reducing vehicle trips and improving infrastructure for alternative transportation like 1 wlaking, bicycles, and public transit? We are forced to use the automobile since there isn't any other reasonable alternative. I only put walki 1 ng because I do occasionally walk to the neighbors house. WATER TRANSPORTATION 1 Unicycling 1 Uber/Ride Sharing 1 Uber/private car service 1 Uber/Lyft 1 Trolley 1 This survey should be asking for solutions. 1 There is no Other, I don't use the bus but survey requires an answer so you can skew results. 1 The Shuttle Bus schedule in the Lower Keys is not frequent enough to be practical. 1 taxi/uber 1 Taxi or Livery service 1 Taxi 1 Siberian Husky Dog team sled (I have a Siberian Husky) 1 Shuttle 1 Shared rides 1 see previous responses 1 Scooter/motorcycle 1 Scooter/Motor cycle 1 Rideshare(friends, Uber, Lyft) 1 Ride share 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 45/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Questionnaire required an answer 1 other 1 only bus I use is the Loop downtown KW 1 not applicable 1 None other. 1 No other... 1 No other 1 Monster truck 1 Longboard skateboard 1 Key West bus stops are to dangerous to allow bus use. 1 Islamorada FreeBee Transportation Electric Vehicles 1 Iguana chariot 1 I would use freebee or another schedulable public source 1 I would never take the bus its unreliable 1 I would never ride a bike down here too dangerous 1 I try to stay off of us1 whenever possible 1 I run and cycle for fitness, but do not do these activities for transportation.There are too many Iocatio 1 ns along US 1 that are unsafe to travel by foot or bike. I often travel locally by boat, especially on weekends, due to road congestion 1 I fly on a plane sometimes 1 I drive a motorcycle and I do not obstruct traffic. 1 I don't know what you want here 1 Hired vehicle 1 Golfcart 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 46/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey golf cart, scooter 1 Goft cart on Old Hwy 1 Friends 1 freebie 1 Freebee ride if it is running-haven't seen it in a while 1 Freebee in Islamorada 1 Freebee 1 Flying. I have my own plane to avoid US-1 to commute to Maimi,where I work. 1 Eliminate cars in downtown Key West; create a more bicycle friendly city across the whole island 1 Electric scooter 1 Electric Kick-Scooter 1 electric car 1 Do not use 1 Do NOT add more lanes. Slow traffic down, cameras that monitor for speeding and issue tickets 1 Carpooling 1 carpool? 1 Car pool into KW 1 Can we get the bright line down thru the keys in master plan? 1 cab,taxi, uber. 1 Bus stops are too dangerous and bus service has been gutted 1 Bost 1 Boat sometimes 1 Boat more boat docking is needed and abandoned boats should be removed from the waterway. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 47/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Bike crossing lights should be but up on the roadside where the bike/Ped. path crosses Rt 1 1 Bicycle 1 Ban 18-wheelers from Key West Down Town. Limit Troleys and Trains. Include electric bikes in traffic 1 1 aws. Put pedestrian stop lights on Duval and Eaton. US1 includes Whitehead that's what I write for D own Town. Almost all automobile 1 airplane 1 Air travel 1 Air taxi 1 ? 1 0 Question 7: If alternative transportation options provided, how would you travel patterns change? Motor vehicle trips along US-1 250 200 150 100 .,; 50 �illll�lli,I 0 ....... Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Sarre Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 48/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Decrease Greatly 42 9.7% Decrease 109 25.17% Stay the Same 228 52.66% Increase 36 8.31% Increase Greatly 18 4.16% ' .. 0 Bicycle riding along the US-1 Corridor/the Overseas Heritage Trail 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 17 3.93% Decrease 15 3.46% Stay the Same 197 45.5% Increase 138 31.87% Increase Greatly 66 15.24% Skipped: �r https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 49/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Walking along U -1 250 200 150 100 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 20 4.62% Decrease 19 4.39% Stay the Same 242 55.89% Increase 123 28.41% Increase Greatly 29 6.7% n S€ti ppec:I< 0 Riding a bus along the US-1 Corridor https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 50/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 300 250 200 150 100 50 '��iillllllf� Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 37 8.55% Decrease 24 5.54% Stay the Same 251 57.97% Increase 96 22.17% Increase Greatly 25 5.77% Recreational driving along US-1 https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 51/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey 250 200 150 100 i 50 Decrease Great... Decrease Stay the Same Increase Increase Great... Answers Count Percentage Decrease Greatly 33 7.62% Decrease 66 15.24% Stay the Same 249 57.51% Increase 62 14.32% Increase Greatly 23 5.31% Question 8: What are the top five most critical transportation needs for US-1? https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 52/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Roadway Improvements-Can include ... Bicycle Improvements-Can include Pedestrian Improvements-Can include ... Public Transportation Improvements-Can... Water Transportation ... VUlU!ll�l4lllU!!!�4«k ���t��tt�� f4 � 4 � 4 s Safety Improvements-Can include ... Access Improvements-Can include ... Scenic View Pull-Off Areas/Picnic Areas- ... 0 100 200 300 400 Answers Count Percentage Roadway Improvements-Can include solutions such as traffic 374 86.37% signal timing improvements, adding turn lanes,through lanes t o improve traffic flow/reduce congestion, improving frontage ro ads, etc. Bicycle Improvements-Can include solutions such as comple 267 61.66% ting the Overseas Heritage Trail, adding missing bicycle lanes, adding bicycle racks, etc. Pedestrian Improvements-Can include solutions such as co 236 54.5% mpleting missing sidewalks, improving/adding crosswalks, pla nting trees to provide shade and/or separation from traffic, etc. Public Transportation Improvements-Can include solutions s 208 48.04% uch as adding additional bus routes, bus stops, increasing bus frequency, improving bus routes based on demand, adding sh elters or other amenities etc. Water Transportation Improvements-Can include solutions su 198 45.73% ch providing a public ferry system or other water-based transp ortation alternatives, improving public boat ramps, better acco mmodate motor vehicles hauling boats, etc. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 53/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Safety Improvements-Can include solutions to improve road 376 86.84% way safety and reduce accidents, such as enforcement, real-ti me traffic monitoring,faster incident response/clearance, impr oved signage, passing lanes,turn lanes, roadway lighting, etc. Access Improvements-Can include solutions such as improvi 274 63.28% ng access to adjacent businesses/sites, consolidating drivewa y access, providing turn lanes, improving frontage roads, etc. Scenic View Pull-Off Areas/Picnic Areas-Can include facilitie 227 52.42% s such as safe pull-off areas with scenic views,shaded areas, picnic tables, etc. r c 43 k ,ed: "I Please note any additional improvements for your selections T01INSIS rglftt�,�,St IraVel safe '[it, 3 accidents Scenic West transportation6, Congestion t a l { _=,�ti t,,<>=I, Herilme ianes €5 tt iane Add pull Pine trash Il 1 n Park Wes ff 1C St'reet are s bridge E tot ', t t icycle make path 11,E 61 side center fix lighls drive Is; t (turn use. 500 �y 24 3 Response Count test 2 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 54/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey We should have a Monroe County shuttle system similar to that in Key West that allows tourists a free 1 ride around town.We must then develop an area for a parking garage/lot where tourists could park th eir cars for their stay. Rowell's Waterfront Park is in the process of being re-developed and could acco mmodate a parking garage for tourist vehicles. A parking garage could also be installed at MM100 be hind Walgreens where an affordable housing development is proposed, if it does not go through. Allo wing this to be a free service would encourage many people to leave their vehicles and would reduce congestion and vehicle accidents. For pedestrian safety, planting more trees or bushes between US1 and the bike lanes needs to continue being a priority. It is a dual benefit of providing shade and protec ting them from stray vehicles. We need to stop over promotion of the keys,that is the root cause of the traffic. Trying to stuff more p 1 eople into the keys is not the solution. Less, not more, please. we need more enforcement than anything. speeding is what kills! 1 We need more"Speed Traps"throughout the Keys including the 18 mile stretch.And Definitely a TOL 1 L. That would help eliminate so many Day Trippers.A minimum of$20.00. This money should be put t owards road improvements. So many bad roads in the Keys. That will also help pay for more police pr esence which will help with speeders. Put in viewing spots instead of people just pulling off where the y please and ruining the shoulders of the road. And stop people from outside Duck Key entrance with grills and canopies. Makes the Keys look trashy. It's beautiful here and an honor and pleasure to be a ble to live in paradise. Let's keep it looking like Paradise. I repeat again...TOLL.Thanks, Marathon res ident. We need another road to get around on big pine key. It is one reason for me to be considering selling 1 my property. We need alternatives to cars that are clean, safe and run on time,with a maximum of 15 minutes(10 1 would be better during rush times)between pickups. We live on the Gulf side of Marathon near the 7 Mile Grill. With the new buildings across the highway 1 on 11th Street and the traffic from newly built Isla Bella,we envision it becoming impossible to come o ur from our street onto the highway. Once the old bridge is open, pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the bike path will provide additional problems for us-especially since we cannot see the traffic coming fro m the south.A third lane (turn lane?)here would help. WE HAVE SPENT MILLIONS ON A BIKE PATH THAT ALMOST NO ONE USES.. CONCENTRATE O 1 N VEHICLE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. INCREASE AMOUNT AND ACCESS OF PARKING FOR A ND TO PUBLIC BOAT RAMPS.ADD A CENTER EXPRESS LANE IN TAVERNIER/ISLAMORADA A REA TO RELIEVE DAILY CONGESTION. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 55/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey We absolutely need better boat ramps, more boat ramps, better boat ramp facilities, and plenty of par 1 king for trucks and trailers, including for large trailers-triple axle. We have the best waters in the worl d and simply awful ramp and facility access. Boat ramp security is a must. US1 needs street lights especially at night 1 Two lanes in each dude tion for it's entirety 1 Turnout lanes are used in other states for trucks and cars not able to keep the speed limit. It is require 1 s that any vehicle with a long line of traffic pull aside to let the traffic pass.With the abundance of boat trailers this would be a wonderful addition to Keys traffic flow. Turning lanes are misused! 1 Turn lanes to prevent rear-end collisions and also possible work-arounds when there are access(traffi 1 c may still be able to pass accident and reduce clogs). Access to Heritage trail from ALL streets inters ecting US1,thereby reducing walking/biking along US1, Improved signage that Trail is available.Wide and open-view turn access to come out of/go into streets intersecting US1. Scenic parking would be I ovely and may prevent people taking pics and looking out instead of ahead while driving. Try to separate local traffic from thru traffic. Try to get bikes off the shoulders and onto their own trails, 1 limit the number of times the bike trail has to cross Rt 1, possibly build bike/pedestrian bridges when t he trail must cross Rt 1, otherwise install a button for a traffic light.We support a toll to enter the Keys to help pay for road improvements. Traffic signal timing is terrible.Was hit on my scooter because of it.Also, scooters do not have enoug 1 h metal to trigger the magnet, so signals need to use a different system to work usefully. Too much out of town traffic esp on holidays&3 day weekend. Cars drive too fast&pass in turning la 1 ne as if it's a passing lane. Residents are just trying to do normal errands like turn into CVS, Publix or USPS facing down speeding tourist rushing to bar in Key West. Toll for non-residents to reduce traffic load and cut down on accidents.Toll on Card Sound road alrea 1 dy forces more traffic to US1. This survey is terrible! I guess someone tried, but for heaven sakes why send this out. 1 There needs to be less traffic on US 1. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 56/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey There are so many beautiful sights here in the keys especially along the bridges all too often drivers a 1 re distracted and not paying attention especially where I live by the fills in lower matecumbe. I think ad ding places for drivers to pull off and stop to take the picture instead of the middle of the bridge going 55mph would help a lot.Also it would be nice to see more police and emergency response vehicles al ong the bridges. There are not five critical needs.We need safety and speed. 1 The pedestrian improvements can also be for bicycle improvements 1 The Pedestrian Bridge will not help traffic congestion, avoid traffic accidents, increase the use of bicyc 1 Ies or initiate a ferry system. No Pedestrian Bridge should be build by Founders Park. If it was to be b uilt anywhere, it would make the most sense where it would be used weekdays and weekends, by Pla ntation Key School and Coral Shores High School. The continuation and completion of the heritage bike/walking path and bridges would greatly improve 1 my experience on Hwy 1. The bike lane that is on the road with cars is dangerous and should be removed and should be replac 1 ed with an actual off-road bicycle trail. Thank you for taking our input. 1 Spending more money on public transportation rarely decreases the publics use of private cars unless 1 there is huge motivating factors ,of which there are none in the Keys. Speed monitoring, increased police presence, elevated bike paths in swampy areas prone to high wat 1 er, channelizers between vehicle travel lanes and bike lanes where bike paths cannot be separated b y vegetation Smarter bus solutions: current buses have low occupancy and many stops making a trip cumbersom 1 e. I suggest using smaller buses or 15 passenger vans devoted to picking up passengers on two keys only at a time and then express to KW( but allowing riders to exit anywhere along trip. Thus. Send m ore busses running but a much quicker ride which will encourage use.There should be an augurythm that can show the flow and timing of smaller buses or 15 passenger vans to expedite flow. 1,for one, would use these if travel was expedited. Signage to get people who wish to travel slower to actually use slow-vehicle turn-out lanes if provided. 1 In other parts of the country,we've seen regularly placed slow vehicle turn-out lanes greatly reduce re ckless passing when slower drivers are required to use them. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 57/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Short term,given the traffic load, there should be a multi-directional center lane available anywhere th 1 e highway does not have four lanes, to facilitate, in particular, safer left turns onto the highway. Pedest rian bridges across the highway, as proposed in Isla, or at least stop-lighted crossings as currently in KW and KL, should be multiplied greatly-especially in Marathon. In general, automobile transit MUS T take precedence over convenience for boat transport. That is what the water is for. Set up a toll at the top of the stretch. 1 Scenic pull-offs 1 Safety- NO PASSING WHATSOEVER on any bridges. Stricter enforcement of speed/dangerous drivi 1 ng between MM 103- 106 (Marvin D. Adams waterway to the start of the 18 mile stretch)--so much sp eeding and changing in and out of lanes with inches to spare. A trip home from Publix feels like a NA SCAR race. Scenic View: It would be so nice to have scenic places for people to pull off and enjoy a s nack, stretch their legs;walk their dog, etc. Before they started construction on the new Community C ollege in Upper Keys(mm106), 1 would see many people coming into the Keys pull into the vacant lot to stretch/walk dog after the 18 mile stretch. Safe bike and walking paths. If it was safe to bike or walk to resteraunts it would reduce amount of traf 1 fic, parking needed, good for environment and be safer for pedestrians. Roadway improvements. Big Pine Key needs an access road parallel to US 1. a lot of the traffic does 1 not need to enter US 1 Roadway improvements-reduce flooding on old highway throughout upper mat Safety improvements- 1 speed kills, reduce speed in high pedestrian walking areas to 35mph, include signs warning drivers thi s is the most deadly highway in the USA Repaving 1 Reduce signs. Us 1 is littered by sign pollution. Paint some directives on road. 1 Pull off areas must have toilet facilities. Frontage roads that continuously run next to U.S. 1 would be 1 a massive improvement during the high season, as they could take business traffic off the highway. T urn lanes are not wide enough. It is nearly impossible to see oncoming traffic when you are crossing t he highway in the median and there is a car trying to do the same thing going in the opposite directio n. This means motorists have to pull out dangerously far to see around the other vehicle. I think the si ze and shapes of vehicles have changed since turn lanes were designed and that should be revisited. An elevated high-speed train above the U.S. 1 corridor would help get tourists to their destination whit e reducing congestion on the highway. If we want people to use public transportation, it needs to be e asy, convenient...and pleasant.Who wants to sit on an open, uncovered bench in the middle of the su mmer...or during a rainstorm?Thank you for asking for opinions. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 58/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Public transportation is THE ONLY WAY to improve the traffic problems on US-1. 1 Protected bike/pedestrian lanes over bridges 1 Please work on keeping cyclists safe. Those of us riding (outside KW and Stock Island)aren't careles 1 s, drunk or otherwise dangerous. We are doctors,lawyers, airline pilots and we contribute to our com munity.We have bikes that cost thousands of dollars,we have helmets, lights and obey the laws. We need your help to make the Keys a fun safe place for real cyclists. Every person cycling safely remov es a car from the road. I would gladly cycle to work, if it were safe to do so. Please consider the white line bumps separating the bike lane for the highway, it will really save lives!Again thank you for helpin g we appreciate it! Please see my above response in number 5. Lastly, the bike lane ends abruptly, in several places,for 1 no clear reason. Theses small omissions should be completed. I appreciate that some bridges have b een opened up for fishing and foot traffic, however,for cyclists its not an option, largely because of the fish hooks, children, debris etc..That is the primary reason cyclists rely on the bike lane.Thank you a gain for taking the time to review these concerns, I do appreciate the enormity of this task you are and ertaking. Sincerely, Thank You! Please make the travel from Key West to key Largo less cumbersome by expanding lanes to 2-lanes 1 each direction from Key Largo to Key West. Please put more walking/Exercise Trails throughout Key West, so residents are encouraged to stay healthy with viable WALKING, JOGGING, EXERCISING o ptions. Please continue the bike trail in the liwer keys. 1 Please consider a toll on the stretch. We don't need day trippers racing up and down us1 . 1 People hanging out on the side of the road needs to be addressed.There isn't proper parking or bathr 1 ooms or anything like that. Cars have to slow down to avoid hitting people, or sometimes people just s low down to be lookie-loos.Also it can't be good for the environment with the trash left behind. Why d o we allow this when parks are available? Pedestrian options need more safety. I won't take my children on the bike path because of the danger 1 of speeding vehicles always wrecking or running off the road. Pedestrian Bridges 1 Passing and turning lanes. Increase the 35 and 45 mph speed limits. Reduce traffic. 1 Paint Mile Markers in 1/10th increments on Upper Matecumbe to help tourists find an address. Might 1 help in other areas.Also(likely impossible )add a southbound lane on plantation key https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 59/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Only allow accesss to US1 at certain points and widen the damn road 1 ohhh bike maintenance stations awesome idea! better more consistent and safer bicycle pathways m 1 ore places to safely cross US 1 nothign to add here 1 none 1 Need to address trash at the bus stops. There are several in Key Largo that always have the cans ov 1 erflowing and trash everywhere. Makes the Keys look junky. This is an easy and inexpensive fix. Put i n more cans, empty them more frequently, post cameras to catch those that liter. It is especially bad b y the Publix/Kmart in Key Largo. Have the businesses help enforce this. Bike safety-lots of vehicles, trucks and boats parking on the bike path, especially the businesses south of cvs in Key Largo. This c an be enforced by police. Need 4 lanes from homestead to key west no more 2 lanes, add red lights in Islamorada upper matec 1 ombe My opinions on this would take more than 1000 words you all need to get this done ASAP No passing 1 on bridges or on tea table and lower daytime speed limits to 35 through heavily tourist walking areas. I don't have faith in your system though Move the truck weigh station that is currently located at Snake Creek. This is a very simple solution th 1 at will only help everyone who uses US-1. more local public transport 1 more enforcement of no passing in turn lanes 1 more direct air routes 1 More cops on US1 we all know where accidents happens,there is never cops of FHP there. Put a pat 1 rol car every 5 miles at the stretch and around Islamorada..Speeding cameras with automatic ticketing and changing location will do great for income as well!! Mile marker 59 to mile marker 61 is very dangerous at night. I witnessed a fatality there and the lines i 1 n the road are not very visible https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 60/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Many areas in the world have dedicated bike paths. We have the ability to Be included in the top 10 li 1 st, a top to bottom focus on cycling safety is the most important thing to create sustainable quality of li fe in the Keys. Right now the bike lane and Heritage Trail is probably the Very best way to Increase yo ur chances of getting struck by a car. I volunteer to become a full time advocate for cycling safety. Pie ase take my offer and let me help guide the DOT decisions with Safety for cyclists paramount Thanks so much for the chance to voice my concerns. Please contact me. Sean Thompson Trisean4733@ya hoo.com Make cycling safe-install sleeper bricks-repair bike lane 1 Make all turning medians the same so that southbound traffic turns into the median on the right hand 1 side and those turning from Northbound enter in front of the Southbound car so that folks can see to t urn. Remove arrows on the left side of the median,we are not in England. Maintain shoulders, the potholes are a challenge. 1 Maintain and improve bicycle lanes. 1 lower speed limits in Key Largo from mm 106 to mm 99 add more pedestrian crossings add more bus 1 stops with better places for the buses to pull over Lighted pedestrian crosswalks rather than high dollar wasteful overhead pedestrian bridge. The pedes 1 trian footbridge project at mm 87 near Founders Park is a waste of taxpayer dollars. The best place fo r that project is 3 miles north at the high school and middle school area. It would be perfect there betw een the bus depot and the median that separates the US1 and Old Highway. Lane barriers like 18 mile stretch (areas of critical need). More turn lanes. Better business accessibilit 1 y(turn lanes would solve this). Increase speed limit in rural areas. Quit shutting down the entire road f or every fender bender. The rest of the world takes it to the shoulder of the road and carries on........w e have to shut the whole thing down for sometimes hours. Toll the road. Give us a commuter train. O h, and if the medians are going to be planted/landscaped, then could someone tend to them?The Ke ys like to tout themselves as a rich person's paradise but the unkempt medians cause us to live up to our White Trash Paradise image. And it gets worse the closer you get to Key West. Keep the bike path debris free 1 Just start with installing the sleeper bumps-I've been nearly run down because of their absence. The 1 State DOT told me"they can only be in areas of 50+ mph"-which is completely inaccurate, they exist currently in 30-45 mph areas and are absent on the most dangerous strip with a speed limit of 55 mph (Summerland to Bay Point, and then again missing on the entire 4 lane stretch from the Quary to KW) https://surveyl23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083al2d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 61/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey It is currently very difficult to cross US 1 in Old Town Key West. Note that there are no cross-walks bet 1 ween White Street and Packer Street(a distance of over 0.3 miles), and there are many people who n eed to cross over US 1 in that area. It would help tremendously to have either STOP signs or traffic Iig hts at all intersections of US 1 within the city of Key West. Please prioritize pedestrian crossing over tr affic speed in Key West. For a good example of prioritizing pedestrian crossing, see the city of San Fr ancisco, CA,where there are 4-way STOP signs or traffic lights at nearly all intersections within the cit y, making it a joy to walk there. In addition, please add wider sidewalks and more bicycle lanes, prioriti zing them over parking spaces. It is an issue seeing around trees to get clear view of oncoming traffic. Businesses say they can't trim 1 and the county doesn't do it. Also in KL looking from one lane across to see where a business is so w e know to make the next turn...The middle of the road plantings are blocking the view of businesses o n the other side. Takes my attention off of traffic ahead trying to figure out if I've missed my turn. Stree t signs sometimes need to be replaced for residential turns off US1. Intelligent due dilligence on any changes requires a residents eye , someone that actually lives and w 1 orks here for over 2 years , knows the community's needs and understands the concept of those that are tired of being ignored for others to line thier pockets. Also the 5 above questions DO NOT RELAT E to improving our traffic problems. Install wall at jet ski beach and maybe a mirror or something so you know if cars are on other side of b 1 ridge because people slow down on top to make sure there are no cars on other side of bridge. install electric vehicle charging stations in public areas such as shopping center parking lots or tourist 1 parking areas In Key Largo,the landscaping in the median from MM 105 to MM 99 is not holding up.Trees fall over 1 or get run over constantly. Please landscape median like it is from MM 96 to MM 90. Consider allowin g a toll for vehicles coming into Monroe County to finance roadway improvements, provide funding an d support for trash clean up, landscape maintenance, and enforcement of illegal signs and parking in FDOT ROW. Help US 1 in Key Largo become less of an interstate and more of a community main str eet. Make it safer and more aesthetically pleasing. Improvements to reduce the number of accidents 1 Improve existing and continue expanding bike paths along US 1, access road on big pine key 1 I'm against the pedestrian bridge project please stop this project and place the bridge 3 miles north at 1 the high school. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 62/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey I think re-painting lines on shoulders for right hand turns where there is enough shoulder would greatl 1 y improve traffic flow.As it is, 50 cars have to almost come to a complete stop because someone wan is to turn right. Often they do this suddenly which contributes to nuisance crashes where people bump into each other because of sudden stops. Post signs saying to keep your eyes on road and maintain s peed. Many people going 32 miles per hour and looking at the water instead of road I think it is important for people to know the real time travel times. Knowledge is power. 1 1 support automatic detection and ticketing of vehicles caught using excessive speed and driving with 1 expired license plates. I believe it would alleviate law enforcement from detection duties and allow the m to focus on things that require more interaction with the public and their investigations.After people accumulate a few moderate fines I think they will change their behavior and it will reduce accidents an d deaths. I must travel US-1 at least 2x per month during the week for work to visit schools and always witness i 1 mpatient and reckless driving, improper passing, and tailgating. Improvements to reduce congestion a nd limit passing should be strongly considered. I left turn lane everywhere you can turn left instead of slowing down traffic in the left lane to make that 1 turn. I know this is a expensive but it's a thought that I think of every time I drive the Us1 some form of tran 1 sportation like a monorail that goes over us1 all the way to key west. It could improve traffic but it will also remove traffic from the daily tripers that could hop in a train from city to city or Miami to key west. I've done the math and yes it's expensive but it's always an idea. Imagine the views you would get tra veling trough the keys and the ease of not having to drive I have lived in the Keys for 24 years and I feel the biggest improvement would be to finally initiate a tot 1 1 at Cardsound Road to control the flow of traffic into the Keys. I think we are at a point where environ mental sustainability is quickly eroding and unless we control the number of people"using"the roads and water around us, there won't be any reason to in the future because it will all be gone. I do not support five of the choices above. I had to include choices which I oppose to complete the sur 1 vey. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 63/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Highly recommend center turn lane in all keys areas. And the signals have to change so the flow of tr 1 affic isn't clear in one direction and not the other for residents to leave their driveway.There should be a toll station at the beginning of the keys. Residents pay a yearly fee of 500 and others pay either a ye arly fee of 5000 or get a daily pass for 100. The keys are a unique, desirable location. Looking at othe r islands thru out the US and the world you will find such passes and fees. Mackinaw Island in MI and Macau in Asia are great examples. (Mackinaw is a motor free island).The bike crossing needs to hav e better signage. Salt Lake City has the most fantastic flashing signs at their crosswalks. Large with fl ashing lights and sound. If the road way is more then 2 lanes there should be arm that comes down a s in a train crossing.Too many people blow right thru the bike crossings even when the light is flashin g at the 4 lanes. Get rid of some of the traffic. US1 is not made for this much traffic. One way in and one way out.All tr 1 affic goes threw upper keys and lowers quality of life. Get bikes off the main roads! 1 Freebee scheduled routes from Islamorada to Key Largo 1 Founders Park Islamorada pedestrian bridge not needed!A waste of taxpayer money 1 For a scenic highway there are too many signs posted every where 1 Fix the potholes. Improve pedestrian and bicycle transport. Allow golf cart travel in pedestrian/bike Ian 1 es. Fix the bridges!!!!!!!!Why was this not one of the options?They need serious investment to keep them 1 safe. BTW, I'm retired (as are many here)so I had to make up an answer to where do you work. You might want to fix that. FIX HOLES .... STOP WASTING MONEY ON SURVEYS 1 Ferry service from Miami, Ft. Myers,Tampa. 1 FDOT has turned key west's north Roosevelt Promenade into an obstacle course with the added thrill 1 that a spill over the edge will result in near certain death. eliminate scooter rentals, actively ticket and fine loud motorcycles, establish more speed traps on Ioca 1 1 roads in Key West i.e. First Street, Flagler Ave. etc, and cut back on the number of conch train tours Eliminate passing over the bridges 1 Eliminate closures/blockages due to parades, bike tours, etc. Do not allow permits for these types of e 1 vents. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 64/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Electric train riding up&down the keys. Tolls for non-residents to finance road elevations. Environme 1 ntal regulations are currently a hindrance on construction and building improvements.The electric trai n could even carry emergency patients and thus take an ambulance off the road. We need to think for ward, not back. Do not hold busy events w/parking along US-1 during peak-traffic periods(or days).This is proven to 1 slow traffic along US-1. This and the Snake Creek Drawbridge consistently slow traffic more than any other static issue(eg-not including crashes). Development of a system that prevents people from driving in the center turn lane 1 Dedicated Bike paths. 1 Coral Ave on Ramrod...turn lane please 1 connect more of the keys by bicycle lanes. Have Key West to Big Pine connected by bicycle lanes all 1 the way. Congestion does not improve with more bicyclists to worry about, busses that stop and hold up traffic 1 and slow speeds in underdeveloped areas. A ferry system that transports workers, sightseers and visi tors is more conducive to alleviating US traffic congestion. Complete the bike trail so that it doesn't require riding on the shoulders of the highway. 1 Close out center turn outs if they don't have a dedicated lane to pull into safely and wait to make a tur 1 n. Example in Key Largo the center turn out at Yellow Bait House has a dedicated lane but by the Fish House and Sandal Factory the turn out either needs to be closer or a lane needs to be added. Hopefu Ily this would prevent accidents as people are traveling 50+and then someone stops suddenly to ma ke a turn with no where to pull off slowly into a turning lane. There are too many spots like this. I drive with my cruise control set at 48 and people fly by at 60+. Consider lowering speed limit to 40 then pe ople might actually drive at 50 not 60+ Clear the debris from the side of the road,this poses the greatest hazard to bicycles and pedestrians. 1 Charging stations for electric wheelchairs and scooters 1 Cars are parked to close to sidewalk corners in residential and old town which make visual access to 1 safely cross the road without get hit or citations needs to increase on such violations or place a low flo wering planters to prevent the park cars from abusing. Can we get the bright line down thru the keys in master plan it would be the single largest factor to red 1 ucing traffic in al of the keys. https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 65/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Buses need to run frequently.And there need to be direct routes from Big Pine to Key West. Currently 1 there is a bus stop a block from my house and a bus stop next to my office. On a good day it takes an hour and 10 minutes to ride the bus to my job, but only 18 mins to drive. If the bus bus is full or breaks down, the next bus is usually 2 hours later. Return bus route is shorter for me, but if I miss the bus tha t stops outside my office at 5:04 (4 minutes after work ends),the next bus won't get me home until al most 8 pm. If the busses stop running due to mechanical issues or weather,taxi or Uber fare runs$25 -45 to Big Coppitt(plus tip)... a very expensive inconvenience. Bus transportation could be more environmentally friendly; move to electric busses. Increase charging 1 stations for EV cars along US 1. Reckless drivers will continue to use turn out lanes irresponsibly and center turn lanes for illegal passing Build a toll on the stretch!!!! 1 Bottom line,we have more people(visitors)than space allocated to handle. You cannot open more hi 1 ghway space unless you dedicate to decrease viable living or businesses spaces. It just doesn't balan ce out. We cannot open four lane highways throughout the Keys, period. Limiting number of people in to the Keys will help reduce traffic, accidents, etc. Unfortunately it's a double edge sword since we're a tourist area and marine sanctuary. Place heavy tolls on all incoming personal watercraft. If they use our waters then they should pay heavy tolls to use it, period. Or we could simply turn the Keys into a g ated community like Ocean Reef and give our environment a break from overfishing, spending million s to resolve traffic issues, and simply clean up what we already have.The Keys already look like a us ed car, boat lot on land and a beatification program and heavy code enforcement to cleanup our land use wouldn't hurt. I'm all in for that change as well. Boondocks in Ramrod Key NEEDS a turning lane into Boondocks. Too much potential of rear end acc 1 idents happening at that location. Bike/Ped. comfort station, benches, bathrooms,Trash containers, racks. Not big just someplace take 1 a break along the pathway. No tolls for homeowners or residents,we pay enough to live here as it is. Bike racks are seriously lacking, it is very difficult to find one and they are oftentimes very full with oth 1 er bikes rubbing together Bike lanes, pedestrian crossings and enforced speed and traffic laws. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 66/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Bicycle's are a good idea however bicycle do not use the provided paths because they are not maintai 1 ned. Bike paths are full of sharp objects that puncture tires. Bikes know that they have a right to use t he road and they do. They want to get down the road quickly,just like everyone else. Scenic bike ride s on US 1 or the Heritage trail is a false notion. And the Heritage trail is not well marked and it's not pr omoted as a safe alternative.And really,who wants to ride their bike in humid 90 degree weather with the Sun full on?That's not comfortable. And it's time to repave the roads in Big Pine Key. Especially K ey Deer Blvd. Bicycle trail needs a serious upgrade. Current trail is barely able to be used by pedestrians. Bicycle tr 1 ail needs to be flat like a roadway and separate from pedestrian trail! Bicycle Improvements:The Heritage, as well as the bike lanes are a joke. Truly! How else could you d 1 escribe a designated facility that abruptly stops in a dead end,with no safe egress solutions available. In spots it is wonderful,world class and then it is literally death defying in others. Bicycle improvements:Add bike maintenance stations(love that idea). Frontage roads(like the Old Hi 1 ghway in Islamorada) need bike paths along both sides of the road. If we are on road lanes with semi trucks, pickup trucks, and cars,the lesser-traveled frontage roads do not provide sufficient room for cy clists and pedestrians to enjoy the more rural option. So, first, ban/prevent semi trucks from accessing them, and secondly, enhance them with bike lanes. Bicycle improvements-must fix the grate at MM31.5 in Big Pine. Bicycle wheels get caught in the grat 1 e since they lay parallel instead of perpendicular and there have been several life threatening and sig nification accidents there from bicyclist's wheel going down in the grate and being thrown over the ha ndle bars in the past 10 years. Bicycle Lane is needed in Key Largo which is one of the most dangero us places to ride where overseas trail does not extend. Bridges need to be reopened to pedestrians a nd bicyclists where now closed to keep all off US1. Bicycle Improvements-There are several spots where it is tight to ride your bike along the road with 1 minimal shoulder.Also,there are a few spots where the bike path is missing or quite rough. Water/Pu blic Transit-I would like to have alternative ways besides a$100+ Uber each way to get to and from Key West. That will help with alcohol related crashes along US1. The bus takes 1.5-2Hrs to get to Du val from Ramrod Key. Bicycle improvements-as a former avid cyclist, portions of the Overseas Heritage Trail are horrifying. 1 The lack of separation from vehicles is unsafe and unacceptable in many locations along US 1. It's sh ocking that there aren't more cyclist deaths in the Keys. I personally stopped cycling on US 1 after mo ving to the Keys and having several very close calls with distracted drivers.Additionally, the bike trail crosses US 1 multiple times-it's very difficult and unsafe to cross the highway. Cars don't yield to ped estrians or cyclists in the crosswalks (they appear to not even notice). Bicycle against the traffic will save lives. 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 67/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey BICYCLE ACTIONS ARE MORE FEEL GOOD THAN COST/ACTUALLY EFFECTIVE FDOT IS NOT 1 EFFECTIVE IN THE BUS BUSINESS. DON'T TRY TO CREATE MORE WASTED EFFORT. BUS CO MPANIES ARE GOING TO AND SHOULD DRIVE THE TRAIN. Adding single bus stops/transportation hubs in Key Largo, Tavernier, Islamorada etc. At each hub the 1 re would be city bikes, FreeBee vehicles, or other modes of transportation to transport people to their i ndividual stops, reducing the amount of bus stops along US. This would improve traffic flow and allow the bus schedule to be more consistent. Add more bike racks and pedestrian crosswalks along US1. A ferry service from Miami or Key Largo to Key West could greatly reduce the amount of vehicle day t ri ps. Add turn offs so tourists can take their damn photos. Them doing 25 in a 55 around a blind turn is not 1 safe. Cameras to catch speeders please. No passing. Add traffic lights at US1 intersections that serve sizable residential communities. 1 add restroom facilities for bikers/walkers 1 Add NUMBERS in bike paths showing Mile Marker numbers in tenths of a mile especially on Upper M 1 atecumbe Non locals always have to slow down to find addresses and something this simple would h elp keep traffic moving Add lane separators, especially on bridges,to reduce opportunities for unsafe passing. Add speed co 1 ntrol devices/e.g. rumble strips or similar at the entrance and exit of each Key where there is a reduc tion in speed limit to alert drivers of the change in posted speed. US1 in lower keys has become a spe edway to get to Key West as fast as possible... let's wake them up to the fact that they are passing thr ough residential areas and not on a highspeed highway! Thank you for all that you will do to make us safer and reduce congestion. Don't forget... add the tolls for visitors by car!! Tourists pay fees to arrive by air... why not by car? Add lane mileage.ADD lane mileage . Add more lanes of travel.Add passing lanes on grassy key, ad 1 d passing lanes on long key, add passing lanes on Lower Mattacumbe key. Add Bicycle Maintenance stations, water refill stations and add a lane from Baby's Coffee to Sugarloa 1 f so cyclists don't have to ride on the road. Add another lane with passing zones for cars to ease the anger and frustration 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 68/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey Add a toll on US1!!!Why does Miami have them and we don't??This would relieve a lot of the day trip 1 pers that come here and rape the keys and destroy a lot of it!! My husband has to pay a to to get to w ork so what's the difference???We need better roads!! Repair the 18 mile stretch!!! Potholes galore o n that road!! But the last thing we need is a pedestrian cross way At founders park!!!! Not one person I know that lives in this community agrees with this useless idea!! Add a toll on 18 mile stretch!! 1 Access management is the biggest issue; most areas are just long, linear curb cuts allowing people to 1 enter/exit Rt 1 in any number of manners.You need your head on a swivel. A real strategic plan. Look at Zermatt Switzerland! No one can drive to it and all transport after the trai 1 n ride there, is free! A ferry system would be excellent. Improved access to pedestrian pathways, pedestrian bridges and 1 a guard rail would be amazing. a ferry system needs to be implemented soon. this will reduce key west traffic through the upper and 1 mid keys dramatically. paired with a stop in Miami it will reduce even more areas of traffic. many route options should be available.travel for all will be greatly diminished as the travel over water will be less impeding during most times. all during evacuations can be used to transport to single area or two for q uicker evacuations. Bike paths are used by others and myself, I see the need for repair all along the p ath. maintenance needs to be addressed as the path will continue to need repairs and at some point will not be useable for a bike path due to the ruts and broken patches of asphalt will continue if nothin g is done. I have also noticed that many areas along the path have over hanging tree limbs!a good fri end of mine has one less eye due to a limb on a bike path, please make sure all limbs are trimmed 8'- 10'high.! Monroe county also needs a road ranger service ! A big problem is people using the road sides as recreation areas. The side of the road is not maintain 1 ed as a recreation area (no bathrooms, no proper parking, no one is responsible for providing or empt ying trash cans, no one is looking at erosion). Why do we allow this?There are plenty of managed rec reation areas in the Keys that are free or low cost. It causes traffic problems, as people are parked on the road side and crossing the road. One area that is as described above that is perpetually a proble m is the road between Veteran's Park and Sunshine Key. 4 lane roadway/bridges to allow traffic to flow around slow vehicles at various intervals on US1 1 1.Auto Ferry service(as like in Europe)from and to Key West from Ft.Myers, Tampa, Ft. Lauderdale. 1 2.A lightrail—perhaps up and down the Keys or even one just for the lower Keys 3. Widening of US1 for better traffic flow increasing revenue for local police for speeders 1 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6083a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 69/70 3/1/2021 US-1 Transportation Master Plan-Survey "through lanes"in the upper keys would be a great idea to improve flow 1 0 https://surveyl 23.arcgis.com/surveys/1 dc8285cc7444654b6O83a 12d 16d6e49/analyze?position=O.question_l 70/70 Areas of Concern Map Input Summary ArcGIS Surveyl 23 Oesrir Owner: admin—emap, created: Sep 15, 2020, updated: Feb 16, 2021 FrSep 21 Feb 9 0 J13 2020 2021 Total Records Total Participants First Submitted On Last Submitted On Surveys Count: 113 (Total: 113) 9/21/20 - 3/1/21 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sep 21,2020 Sep 2S,2020 Oct 30,2020 Nov 24,2020 Dec 30,2020 Jar 30,2021 Top Participants User Surveys Submitted Anonymous user 113 � \ \ \ ) 7 � \ L ƒ\v s � . \= 3 [ / k � ID / » 7 O ► \, d t \ x ± » ƒ . \ . .\.« e ° d � Q) �-W \ a ITI \ / / (N < 3 a _ ) ./ E � % s \ \ e � . & E � e \ . » \ <\ƒ§ / ` \ O ► x ± t /» . 0 L .. e �� 2 \ 1 � Q) � / / / = 2 a \ � � r � e 21 OD s j; J LL %zo, Q) C) O LLJ t Q) CD (N ol US-1 Transportation Master Plan - Areas of Concern Public Description of Area existing helpful beach tD�� ti 'f busy oi�. Sugarloaf mph �i.".�,,s ahem, hLaw residents accidents drive Corning A`, lines trank 104 BPK me light area West vehicles MM Pine 2 7 Deceleration77 FOOT say ust LANE traff I C local }ti1 S low c8ls lanes �� 'j"j 'd � �� Y f fA 0 i���"��it� ��ueet hour train ��t�s�t t�'ti � School cut F..".,, "'Twat ul`o t Sea stored I Response Count Your survey is a technical train wreck allowing only your predetermined answers 1 We need to clear the North Roosevelt Promenade,the sidewalk on the gulf side, of obstructions to cy 1 clists,widen the curb cuts, and install a safety railing. We need a traffic light during morning and evening rush hours at US1 and 4th near Bobalus. 1 We need a ferry system from Miami to Key West for tourists, Keys residents/snowbirds wanting to enj 1 or other parts of the Keys without driving stress, as well as labor commuting the Keys (buses stoppin g and holding up traffic defeats congestion improvement). Shuttles from Miami airport to the ferry woul d reduce US1 congestion exponentially. Vessels are being stored under Jewish Creek Bridge some of them are in derelict condition. There are 1 signs posted saying no mooring within 100 ft but there is no enforcement. USING FIXED BRIDGE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CLEARANCES DEVELOPED WITH US COA 1 ST GUARD MIAMI PLAN A FIXED BRIDGE ON GULF SIDE OF EXISTING BASCULE BRIDGE AND DESIGN SUCH REGARDLESS OF ESTIMATED REMAINING LIFE OF EXISTING SNAKE CREEK B ASCULE BRIDGE. US 1 Key West to Florida City 1 Turn lane at MM22, plus FILL just one side of the retention basin nearby so people trying to get aroun 1 d those turning into Raffy Rd won't slam into the water. Also, need SOME access(via the fill??-even if just dirt/gravel/cleared of a path)to get to Heritage Trail from the highway. Currently people must tra vel along US1 at a curve to cross to get to nearest access point. Dangerous. People don't use the Trai I because there aren't enough access points for tourists especially,to see them. Waste of excellent re source to get bikers/walkers off the highway. Thank you. Trying to make a left turn from Publix side road (not from light on Sombrero Rd.) 1 Tremendous damage to FDOT landscaping, DEP Overseas Heritage Trail, and FDOT ROW due to to 1 w company exceeding the footprint of their property and parking and storing vehicles,washing vehicle s and repairing vehicles in FDOT ROW. Delivery trucks also destroying trail. Traffic volume into Keys needs to be more restricted of day trippers&tourists! 1 Traffic through Big Pine, particularly with looming large-scale development proposals at the island's e 1 astern end,will never improve enough to call it satisfactory until the county commission finds a way to get local traffic off the highway to the greatest extent possible. Some type of cross-island artery is nec essary, an opinion put forth by every traffic consultant in the last 20 years. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS: ESTABLISH FULLY COORDINATED SIGNALIZATION FOR ALL SIGNALS 1 ON SR5 WITH SMART CONTROLLERS FROM FISHERMAN'S HOSPITAL TO COCO PLUM DRIVE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SIGNALIZATION WITH SMART CONTROLLER 1 Traffic on weekends in the Upper Keys is abysmal. As residents, during"season",we have become pr 1 isoners in our own homes. It is impossible to visit the mainland without experiencing lengthy delays be ginning in Florida City where the Turnpike ends into US1. On Labor Day(Sunday)weekend, I returne d from Cocoa Beach at noon. It took 1 hour and 40 minutes from where Turnpike traffic backed up aft er the Campbell Drive exit and when I reached my house at the 105mm. This really takes away from q uality of life in the Upper Keys. Traffic from Robies 1 Traffic backups at MMs 101-99 due to stop lights. Can traffic lights be eliminated and replace with rou 1 nd-abouts? This narrow winding road needs a bike path. If there are public rights-of-way which would allow a five- 1 foot or six-foot path, it would enhance garbage pickup and allow better maneuvering for cars as well a s encourage cycling. This is an exit from this neighborhood for traffic going south,the bridge over the cut is pretty close and 1 a possible blind spot for vehicles going over the speed limit. There has been a few very serious and tr agic accidents there in the last few years as the traffic steadily increases through Key Largo. This cafe uses the ROW for multiple signs ,trailer and parking.They need some help in arranging a s 1 afer access to their business. This bus stop is chronically surrounded by trash. It makes it hard to advocate for bus stops when they 1 are so unsightly. There needs to be a turn lane going to and from boom docks. 1 There is a helpful southbound, righthand deceleration and turn lane at the corner of US 1 and Sunshi 1 ne Blvd. It needs to be longer because there are at minimum 257 homes with residents using Sunshin e Blvd. With the longer decel lane,the US 1 bike path and shoulder needs to shift slightly to the west. More homes are being built on the empty lots in this neighborhood. Instead of being able to turn off U S1, residents of this neighborhood get stuck in southbound traffic which is often stopped at the traffic I ight, but we would be happy to enhance traffic flow by entering a longer deceleration lane and getting off of US 1 and into the neighborhood. There are too many directions in which bicycles travel on the Boulevard. it is extremely dangerous to 1 make any kind of turn onto it because there is always a bike, a skateboard, an electric bike etc.. comi ng in all directions.There needs to be rules set for them. I also think that having a bikes allowed on th e actual street should not be allowed. The lanes should be for legal motorized vehicles only. The speed limit from Mile Marker 103 to 99 should be 35 mph. Maybe even from Mile Marker 106 to 9 1 9. People treat the main part of Key Largo as a highway. It is dangerous for folks making local trips, bi kers and walkers. The southbound left turn lane at Orange Lane (roughly MM 87.5)is too short to allow normal decelera 1 tion for a turn. The turn lane should be lengthened. The light in BPK backs up the traffic to the Bahia Honda bridge during holiday weekends and during t 1 he busy winter"snow bird"season. The congestion and slow down could be avoid if the lights are tim es for these heavy times.A roundabout study could be a solution here. The length of US1 throughout the Keys 1 The length of US1 has many speed limits. It would be tremendously helpful to have speed limit chang 1 es painted on the road surface-much like painted signs used on the Turnpike identifying lanes for the airport or Route75. I know if a BEGIN 55MPH icon were painted on the road surface after the Sugarlo of Lodge and a BEGIN 45MPH icon painted at Shark Key, the flow of traffic would be VERY much sm oother. Marathon and Islamorada have speed change and would benefit as well.This would make aft er hurricane traffic flow not victim to downed road signs as we saw for a year after Irma.Also, in conju nction with my previous request for updated day/night speed limit signs on BPK, It would be awesome if there was headlight sensitive paint that would show 35MPH on the road when head lights shone on it. (Or is that too futuristic!?!)Thanks for your consideration. Cali Roberts Big Pine Key The intersection at US1/CocoPlum has a stoplight but no crosswalk. It is also the intersection of 2 ped 1 estrian/biking paths but no safe way to get across US1. The light does not have a"push button"option for people or bikers to cross the highway nor is there a crosswalk for pedestrians. The bike path hasn't been repaired since Irma 1 The apron could use to be extended here, it is tight with the cars and riding a bike 1 The 7 Mile Bridge to Key Haven is a very dangerous section for cyclists.The path is littered with poth 1 oles, garbage and just ends without warning. Additionally, there is nothing separating the cars and tru cks from cyclists. In random parts,the sleeper bumps exist, but inconsistently. For example, in the 45 MPH between Big Pine and the Torches,which is great, and even in Big Pine where the speed limit is just 35MPH they are present.The problem is,where the speed limit further toward KW, is 55, there an d there are none, nothing.This part of the Keys is traversed by serious cyclists,we wear protective cl othing, have lights and helmets.We need your help to make it safe to cycle in the Lower Keys. Every cyclist is one less car on the road.Thank you for trying to help-we appreciate you! test meeting#2 1 Stop or deter cars from taking the Old Hwy to get past slow traffic on US1. They are actually causing t 1 he backup when returning to US1. Speed limit is not enforced at all. Its like a speedway from the CVS to the bridge going north 1 Southbound on the Tavernier Creek Bridge there is a"Traffic Light Ahead"warning blinker. It begins to 1 flash when the traffic light goes to yellow. In the past it would begin to flash before the light began to t urn yellow. If the blinker was not flashing when I drove past, I knew that I would not have to stop for a red light. That is no longer the case. I would like to see the former system restored. Snake Creek Drawbridge. Causes South bou nd-traffic to be delayed by up-to an hour,from the drawbr 1 idge pile-up's alone. Sea Oats Beach at MM 75 was a sea turtle nesting beach but erosion has led to road becoming vulne 1 rable to tides and surges. Sea turtles try to nest there anyway but cannot because FDOT's crumbling concrete berm keeps them from being able to dig their nest. Turtles are also in danger of crawling ont o US1 as it is their nature to return to their historical nesting location. They don't understand that the b each is no longer there. Restoration of the road needs to include consideration of the turtles nesting g rounds. ROW southbound from Lauderdale Dr to Miami Dr is dusty crushed rock.Vehicles using it as a road. 1 Erosion and pot holes. Floods. Unsightly. Landscaping needed. Traffic controls to route vehicles wher e there are roads. Repaired potholes are uneven and vehicles drive on shoulder to avoid them. Northbound from just pa 1 st Jewfish Creek Bridge to the Monroe County line. Remove the diesel powered Loop Buses. Replace with electric. They do not have much use now at all 1 with Covid and probably shouldn't be used at all for caution. REEVALUATE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SPEED ZONE OHIO KEY TO 7 MILE BRIDGE AND EITHE 1 R DISPLAY FULLY OR RESTORE TO 55 MPH Quite frankly, I don't think a dime should be spent on anything until existing traffic laws--pedestrian, bi 1 cycle, motorist--are actually ENFORCED! To do anything else as far as I'm concerned is just a constr uction worker boondoggle. Put in a toll. Widening the stretch won't help as long as traffic still has to merge into one lane. Revenu 1 e for the county to help maintain roads . public meeting test 1 Please turn on the street lights on the 4 lane. It's been 3 years since Irma.That length of time to repai 1 r lighting is unacceptable. Please study the issue of egress to the opposite direction of travel across US1 from neighborhoods. T 1 his is not specific to Summerland Key, it's an issue all over the Lower Keys.And, we have the Hertitag e Trail that zig zags back and forth across US 1.As pedestrians,we can frequently wait 10 minutes fo r both lanes to clear, enough to run across the highway. Most neighborhoods(or Hertitage Trail crossi ngs)do not have traffic lights, nor do I recommend having a few hundred down US1, but as traffic has increased so dramatically,this is what Keys residents face and one of the reasons they complain that the traffic is so bad. Stopping overdevelopment&sprawl is a far better solution that 100 stop lights! I is ironic that a nice resource like the Trail was created, yet just getting to it can be very dangerous. S ame concept applies to pulling out onto US1 in a car-don't know what the solution is, but it is a trans portation/traffic problem. Please put a stop light at the East end of College Road and US1. Too many times I have witnessed m 1 any accidents and near miss accidents from people turning onto and out of College Road. There are THOUSANDS of people who live, work, and go to school on College Road. FDOT please please plea se install a traffic light here to help prevent accidents and help with the flow of traffic from US1 to Coll ege Road. Thank you very much for your consideration! Sincerely, KWGC resident Please move the pedestrian walkway between Southpoint/Lower Sugarloaf Key and Sugarloaf Shor 1 es/Lower Sugarloaf Key from the current West side of US1 to the East side of US1. This would be of big safety benefit so that residents using the bus stop on the East side of US1 would not have to cros s the very busy traffic of US1 to reach it. Please fix the pedestrian bridge so it is safe for residents of Lower Sugarloaf to travel by foot or bike t 1 o Baypoint. Please finish the bike/pedestrian path along the entire keys. Thank you. 1 Please do not spend our tax dollars on the proposed pedestrian bridge.The cost does not justify the 1 minimal use it will get. It will also be an unsightly distraction to our scenic highway. It will attract graffitt i. Please 4 lane MM 77 to MM 90 traffic there is an embarrassment! 1 On Windley Key, is there a need for 6 connections between US 1 and the Old Hwy?TAt many of thes 1 e connections there is no left turn lane for southbound traffic. Southbound card wishing to turn must w ait in the traffic lane until northbound traffic permits a turn. On Plantation Key at Plantation Key Colony(Royal Poinciana Dr.)to Snake Creek Bridge and further 1 west to MM79. This is the heaviest traffic area in the upper keys. Not only do four lanes reduce to two,we have two school zones.The four lanes on US 1 must continu 1 e the length of Plantation Key, along with adding many more deceleration lanes on this Key. Improve ments are needed in this heavily-traveled area to keep the cars moving since there are constant bottle necks. Crossing the highway during school times also slows the cars, Build a pedestrian overpass for the students and general public and solve this crossing problem once and for all. North bound turning left into or out of CVS there is a mud pit where vehicles have eroded the ROW try 1 ing to get in and out of CVS parking lot. Very tight access and congested area where traffic backs up f or light and vehicles create new lanes to turn. New tenant moved in and all FDOT ROW landscaping has been removed. 1 More police patrols in Summerland Key to catch illegal passing using the center turn lanes mile Iarker 1 24 to 25. more mergin lanes so drivers stop useing center turning lanes to merge into traffic. 1 MM27 Ramrod. Coral Ave intersection with Hwy1 Northbound from KW up the Keys. Without a turn la 1 ne, the traffic behind your car often slam their brakes or tries to go around on the shoulder in front of Aqueduct plant. Super dangerous. MM106 landscaping around"Welcome to Key Largo"sign in median has been allowed to become we 1 eds. Looks nothing like it was when originally installed. MM 110 needs landscape buffer because boats anchor and raft up in view of vehicles traveling on 18 1 mile stretch causing rubber necking which leads to back ups. Landscape buffer would screen view an d keep traffic moving ending backups. Make the bridge a non passing zone.We cross the bridge 2 or 3 times a week and a lot of people pas 1 s on double lines coming at us or force you to break to allow them back in. Very dangerous to everyon e. Post the correct deaths on sign leaving Key West, May cause people to think. Lots of accidents in this area because of tourists not paying attention to the road, too much to see. Ma 1 ybe more flashing signs. Leave the draw bridge over Snake Creek, but open only every 2 hour or 4 times a day. there is a high 1 bridge already in place at Channel 5 . large vehicles parked along northbound KLWTD lot blocking line if sight for vehicles trying to turn left 1 onto northbound US 1 from service road between KLWTD and Mobile gas station. Large construction vehicles stored in ROW 1 KEY WEST TO EIGHTEEN MILE STRETCH: ESTABLISH WITH US COAST GUARD MIAMI BRIDG 1 E SECTION CHANNEL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CLEARANCES FOR ALL CHANNELS Key deer Boulevard on big pine key is terrible. It needs to be repaved. Members of our association cc 1 mplained and was told it's not in the budget. Just prior to the bridge leaving big Coppitt south bound to Boca chica there is a slight curve in the roa 1 d sometimes at night it is difficult to see I would suggest some reflective markers on the right side Issue with the timing in this light as you enter heading south from the TPK into Florida city. The conge 1 stion and back up reach the TPK. Islamorada Village 1 Islamorada 1 Install more pedestrian cross brides along mm 104 and other high pedestrian use. Most definably on I 1 sla-Morada Bay, Founders Park. Increased housing with add traffic to area where southbound drivers are anticipating 55 mph zone, no 1 rthbound traffic hasn't always reduced to 45 mph speed In Key Largo in general, the crossovers are very confusing. Locals tend to do it the opposite of how it i 1 s done in other places. Several of the crossovers have lines painted to show the proper way to use it. I think that all crossovers in Key Largo should have lines painted to clarify the proper traffic pattern. E xamples of a crossover with lines painted are at mm 105,just south of Key Largo School, and at mm 102.5 at the Circle K. I'm AGAINST the Pedestrian Bridge idea at mm 87 near Founders Park.The bridge is a waste of taxp 1 ayer$$. PLEASE stop this project at this location. It would be better used daily at the area if the scho ols about 3 miles north.A lighted crosswalk would be a better option at Founders Park. Thank you I neither drive a car nor ride a bike, so I have no dog in this fight. But as a pedestrian in old town key 1 west where I live, I would much rather deal with the cars than with the bicycleists,who pay no attentio n to road signs, street directions, or right of way for people,on the sidewalk. I would prefer fewer bicycl es rather than more, or at least license them and have some enforcement of the laws. I don't hate bic ycles, but something needs to be done about the riders. Thank you. Heavy congestion south bound due to 2 lanes to 1 & high school. 1 Heavy congestion due to bridge& Founders Park. The pedestrian bridge is not a good solution.It will 1 be a big waste of$. FROM BOCA CHICA TO FLORIDA CITY EVALUATE AND PRIORITIZE ALL ROADWAY SEGMENT 1 S THAT HAVE POTENTIAL FOR FOUR LANING WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL CONDEMNATION. Floating junk yard made up of floating structures and derelict vessels moored in FDOT ROW. Environ 1 mental hazard and unsightly along scenic highway. Could cause damage to US1 during a storm. Flexible middle lane barriers to keep drivers from passing in the middle lanes. MM 83 sees severe mi 1 ddle lane passing and has residential neighborhoods with families pulling out not knowing if they will b e hit head on or not. EIGHTEEN MILE STRETCH: 1)DEVELOP EDUCATION AND SIGNAGE PROGRAM (AND INSTAL 1 L)FOR DRIVERS TO USE CRUISE CONTROL AT SPEED LIMIT OR EXPECT DELAYS. (MAY EVE N REVERT TO A"BURMA SHAVE"SIGNAGE TO GET MESSAGE ACROSS.)2)EVALUATE WHEN AND IF"FOUR LANING"WOULD BE SAFER. Do something about the backup of traffic in Islamorada. Possibly have two lanes in each direction usi 1 ng the old access roads. Or convert the middle lane to a directional lane passed on the direction of tra ffic at time of day. Use lights overhead, and road markers with lights to guide the cars into the appropr iate lanes. Difficult to enter highway with cars increasing speed to 55 1 Cross island artery to get local traffic off US 1 on Big Pine Key. Deceleration lane at new swim hole pa 1 rk northbound. Acceleration lane at Ship's Way southbound. Create turn lanes along US1 for residents of Big Pine to be able to get out of the exceedingly long line 1 of traffic heading to and from Key West when they are only attempting to get home from work. Coming off Jewfish Creek Bridge. Alleviate Bottleneck. Cease speeding off of the bridge. Revisit creat 1 ing a Roundabout.There have been deaths and permanent injuries that have occurred at the Fork. S pin on and off from 905,from the northbound lanes,from the southbound lanes. Erect a LARGE Welc ome to Key Largo(&the Florida Keys)sign and/or move the Giant Lobster into the center of the Roun dabout. Get creative, informative and practical. Build the bathrooms, parking, pedestrian path and landscaping that has been promised for years now. 1 This should be a beautiful scenic pedestrian and bicycle stop and not an ugly open storage area for a landscape/construction company. bring back the bus route that was on united st 1 Boater have decided to make this a place to anchor and hang out. Maybe bing a table an chairs and s 1 et up in the water. It a distractions to drivers and back up traffic well over the bridge while people slow down to look at the activity on the water. Making a no anchor/stoping zone would help alleviate this pr oblem boat dealership parks trailers and boats in FDOT ROW between their driveway and Lake St. causing I 1 ine of sight blockage. Big Pine Key 1 Bicycle Grate at about MM 31 -grates need to be changed to perpendicular instead of parallel. With t 1 he current way grates are laid bicyclists wheel can fall into the grate forcing them to be thrown from th eir bike over the handle bars.There have been several life threatening accidents in this spot due to th e grate. Changing how the grate is laid would prevent tires from going down in the grate as that canno t occur if the seam is perpendicular to the rider. At the light on US 1/Ocean Bay Drive, please add pedestrian walkway from the light east down Atlanti 1 c to the Key Largo Community Park. The bike path goes along the highway, but people wishing to wal k back to the park must go through parking lots, cut through lots, and generally are exposed to vehicle traffic. An endless stream of fast moving traffic in both directions makes left turn entry to US1 from local road 1 s dangerous. More traffic lights on US1 are needed. Along all segments of the Old Highway(Old US 1 maybe known as SR-4?),we need bike lanes on B 1 OTH sides of the Old Highway for cyclists,walkers, moms with strollers, runners, etc). Right now,we compete with semi-trucks delivering construction materials daily to Forest Tek on Plantation Key as w ell as mail on Upper Matecumbe as well as development-related dump trucks and other construction v ehicles on the Old Highway throughout the village. The trucks slowly lumber along the Old Highway a nd take up more than their allotted lane. It's so frustrating to have these types of massive vehicles on what is theoretically nice, quiet rural neighborhood streets. HELP! Add more street lights from mm 103 to 106 1 Add continuous bike path from Key Largo to Key West vs the current patchy ones. 1 Add a toll on US-1 entering the Keys 1 add a toll on US!for non residents and commercial vehicles to help offset and fix all the environmental 1 impacts created from visitors and commercial vehicles Add a right hand turn lane onto Village Drive from US1 southbound. 1 Add a right hand turn lane for Sunset Blvd, southbound on US 1 (at Tower Pizza). 1 Add 4-way STOP signs or traffic lights at intersections on US 1 between White St and Windsor Ln in 1 Key West to help pedestrians cross US 1. ACCOMPLISH DETAILED ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STUDY FOR ISL 1 AMORADA FROM TAVERNIER TO MM 77+/- A traffic light is desperately needed at this intersection. 1 A major improvement would be to establish an OFF ROAD pedestrian and bicycle path that would pro 1 vide a safe passage from Homestead to Key West to increase desirable tourism. The only areas that would require special considerations would be on the Seven Mile bridge and other bridges that do not have special off road lanes currently.The majority of these could be add on structures to the current b ridges or in the case of the seven mile bridge a shuttle that runs back and forth across the bridge and charges a minimal fee($10 or?)would enable the completion of a world class bike experience. The a dditional funding could be accomplished by adding a road fee for US1. Obviously, have an annual fee for residents so the bulk of the revenue comes from tourism. I doubt any tourists would avoid the Keys due to a fee. If they do, how much value do they add to the economy anyway since they probably had to pay a steep turnpike fee.The keys are a treasure and should be treated as such. Thank you 1)LEFT TURN SR5 TO SOUTH ROOSEVELT SINGLE LANE FLYOVER. 2)TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1 SIGNALIZATION COORIDINATION AT: N &S ROOS EVELT/COLLEG E/C E NTE R/MACDO NALD/CV S/COLLEGE INTERSECTIONS 3) LEFT TURN EXPANSION TO COLLEGE FROM NB SR5 4) UTILI TY(FKAA&KEYS ENERGY&COMMS) RELOCATIONS TO UNDERGROUND INCLUDING AT A DI STANCE (HA! I thought I'd reach another screen after I hit submit. I didn't realize my whole concern was to be 1 written here. ) My concerns for Big Pine Key:the double speed limit signs need to be updated. They a re horribly antiquated and work poorly at best. I would suggest regular 45MPH signs along Big Pine wi th additional illuminated blinking signs that say 35MPH. They should be light sensitive (like the street li ghts.)I have lived on BPK for 20 years and have had endless occasions where following cars are dan gerously tailgating because they are oblivious to the speed limit change. They see me as a slow drive r and think riding my trunk will make me drive faster. This puts complying drivers into unnecessary ris k. Illuminated signs are long over due.Also of note: at the entrance to Marathon (heading northbound after exiting the 7 Mile Bridge), there is now a YOUR SPEED sign.A few of these across BPK that wo rked at night would be very helpful as well. Cali Roberts Big Pine Key There is slow down of traffic due to boaters anchoring close to overseas highway and while drivers dri 1 ve South they rubberneck to see the boaters. There should be boating restrictions not to allow such b oating activities that slow traffic. Another solution would be to plant mangroves as a buffer and or buil d a wall to prevent rubber neckers. The best solutions would be to restrict anchoring along this stretch of traffic. Answered: 113 Skipped: 0 Contact Us Emails From: EMAP To: Rumley.Will;Scholler,Jillian; Reddy,Vivek;Galdos.Carmen Subject: US-1 Master Plan:A message has been received from Janene Date: Monday,September 21,2020 10:17:45 AM Name: Janene Phone: Email: sclafani-janene@monroecounty-fl.gov Message: Test From: EMAP To: Rumley.Will;Scholler,Jillian; Reddy,Vivek;Galdos.Carmen;Sclafani-JaneneaMonroeCounty-FL.Gov Subject: US-1 Master Plan:A message has been received from Roger McVeigh Date: Friday,October 02,2020 2:45:34 PM Name: Roger McVeigh Phone: 3053947555 Email: rogermcveigh@bellsouth.net Message: More emphasis on reducing vehicle miles travelled and providing funding to improve infrastructure for alternative transportation From: EMAP To: Rumley.Will;Scholler,Jillian; Reddy,Vivek;Galdos.Carmen;Sclafani-JaneneaMonroeCounty-FL.Gov Subject: US-1 Master Plan:A message has been received from Carlina Rodriguez Date: Wednesday,January 20, 2021 8:13:59 PM Name: Carlina Rodriguez Phone: Email: keysnme 1 @att.net Message: Why is this survey for working people only? Do non-working people not drive on US 1? From: EMAP To: Rumley.Will;Scholler,Jillian; Reddy,Vivek;Galdos.Carmen;Sclafani-JaneneaMonroeCounty-FL.Gov Subject: US-1 Master Plan:A message has been received from Rosalind Paragus Date: Friday,February 05,2021 7:28:23 PM Name: Rosalind Paragus Phone: 3055221436 Email: rparagus@yahoo.com Message: I would love to get speed bumps on Transylvania Avenue in Key Largo. There is a school at the beginning of the street and another at the end of the street. Buses go flying down the street which is residential with lots of children and senior citizens walking. Anything to slow them down. Thank you Rosalind Paragus Final Public Meeting Presentation I l lilli I' quo � I i �*r .f l k 1 , s ! f!it t`;y�lj{Sti`41}1i l'++�i\'��}� \ M1 � ax "'•v� -— q+\�� � y, rw � s 1 �'�l� � 1`+1 1ttflritS{S,As ���l�� r -tAyyt�l}� {r�l�dilijjp�iii� � - - i f { ,! s t ➢�}7 tltssl4iQ��t11I{�jitl���i���'(�I �' Y��t —_ � � t rlir r\�� I 4 s trts)y��'J��lti`sy3�j�yr��1 } �r t7 j f /1 I-)f l(15 r tg3 tl 2 r) ) ti 1. t ii}Bsy1rslsrS�`4}{st711�� — s 3 ,'t�1�r�1119�7t7���5 y n I7�Yys}i�I�V�y{stUi �_ a� y ##t 14 �lffl�t rlsstfr r i ti rs \r�,� `Ir ri a21r SItIJJ`t� ��I } it .- ��,' rttlttlisssti � � ��y�i) u� �t3 - S))S tt,±\ 47�itlrtr�1�s)�i�7ir;��ytSSl��ij\��l aiv = � ' aq` s s rs� tipA'1 ���E r sl1 70 �u 0 c 70 s, � l ol�u 70 5... �,.. ♦ • 0 # A 0 0 ill{�J;ilil4if ltr 1r4 0—i�a r nrr r rrt��it�\r in�ltlw S�14��� S^ C' n 0 SM.. D cry d S F ,- , ts,1 1 U, t s , v s' )rsk s sis trft�i i p�m v 3 k� 1 11jj...... salOVA ;t i Y3t 7� ti st y'; rp)I) t3N7 'z x s cwx g + J}yy Ol�4�l �4i ��14V'fli�lll �\ e -- I - � USA 4(t 1i s)IIr#f}r2 MORN t ttstt-��14 1 pp tt "ii-- ro �z.s;z, � __. -. .. S ..rt,,a,,. .,.... . . bA r u, RIFAMUMMMAERM .!4 OA� 4} O3 0 =,3 Q7 � O � © O0 v � yZ O i! • N O Q1 Q + Q UV5 ll N AJ < c "—`-- O U c� x of _ cL a.. :r O " ii ts3 Q} t , 4 s t Jt C14 M N CTv 4 !� t � t S t 11 l+# >�ytt� f�'s tt i ¢!, N 4h 10 01 CD t n sit s�s ri}i { P -0 0- Lo N 00 O N N -Cj `� "O ... Q'° Cy. -O tV (D C Ci O tU �j • CL 0 N C Q Oc O CL Oco CF O g }1i44ti N T3 OJ "` LS} N ww— w ` Dot Q NT3a c NQ c3 � Q N D �` D s C 4 s s £i si pdts� C4 it t i 7s ifl s f4� LO N N ,• � `ttrSi ilst �i 1 tljf�lf�1 10 LO cyi i �)t}ts Ut is 4 LO N M co ts1`Iy}st'f it)) i'i ti co y (D > ' a � t � a o > >. cam cca , °D U a 4l�ttt,t t{tritr�t�V�r��N�IU'�� ii ' O O >, is E lb Q 4i 0 Zi O U co a p �t�4ttti �? '}Qf 4 O mo E 5 � O !D E Cc C r O � "'r O C! � U 0 oc "" o U c Q D �;itt`r�f4jij�t,,t 4 <n O '> p Lu t'tt G'si; ��1 4?�y� �?� � .... CS :► 04 C) c�� a CT Ch of CT O� ,f 10 1 • 04 o N {'1 C © CS 4�7 © C — CN C3 p t ti, Q q Q) 7 ( 7 ZS 2 c m 1 2 U q�j N c Z af r" ,i f � ' t k ,i — — F t j�SSf 'IfjT l J ,t%,'} M 0- r f rf, 11 s y st'ir,ft�tA�l� ca - 01 1 Ko Ln C7 Lo �j C7 i CON �t r'i f4l vi{Silt+4f C7 c� n (7 — O _ w rt (D V 9 - � � O �T7 _Q �[ � �w tl 4 0 i7 �[ 0 O c tt;ft Ii�t<t o4{i fci s�l l7 O 43 < O �' N Q _ 9J N <( � v O f 1 r f a \�}i {y��l�{9fsi " OTC C. N C CL p. CL � (Li [L C S 1 t f...3 s V) to to V �E � r� f ,�i��� f (D01 silt} r v 11t fs r � 1�{tl 1 111 s l s �.r sr tt v4l��(t fs 1,;�f G7 M r" h. t0 cv 10 �CI4 cN r vli s1i ��t 4 CI4 00 rs I"c3}Sc'flt )i 'jit{{ c� �ci CC) QI �r , Lq CN of r s It 1�� ats Q > D 4n Q3 N t' ' ��r zrt�lllfd$miau}�� Q a m �:_ 'Sift flt( tliv;s�ti1'l3 s, • + a '0 O .".� C LL 7��(Ut�z\ �tt)t{I ts{ r"" AGM.•, '�'C U G0 0 ) M ZE W c1CD 141�4��I a ytt}f i s1,t1` 3`1it 4ti,1 a i st,"ii� 01 � 01 ,;, <.,,islst a 1a, psi, S 00 1+t�lIg cT� CFt MOVIll u »sir�,r,r •-i 4a p .-r c t co 90 90 04 00 00 d 0 Ln 7 V Ol'AN Ln Qj CO Co c s rt ; 1 � 14r N m 1 iirrirSrgs��£iA��i \l��y k`I SA C7 4 t c Q cu :*. k ! U 0 C] t i£�j41f c{>t£l��1}4\Str S{�(114y4� "CF. y— 0 M N ..� � zs Q C ? . co Ln 0 C :.0 jj G5 .0 p C y t>17. �. { i CL CC tS3 517. m Q [fl @ il? 93 � )r\ttrrlt,�\ Ni t 2 i li 4fttt`�Jfr{ ��rll`19.. w a r a cu �d1 U U � N a N S� rua ki \r, 2 1122222 '"'kt21t rl�lir lYr III-�iftt�2}}, III s �bf SiSI ri s N l� st 7al 4 S tttlt}i��a x-1 r4 e^I t}s ra t Is 1l�it tl�(pllq�� V1 .c—i s-I C7 ri C? Ot5 n ' ��III��ilsl�ftl�}� 0 � � � rt rk ry rI rr ,�+ � «r r1 � y}rLA rnM rl 4 c^I 00 co � s rsll tsli)tlrf�4'i�t��t;ll���4�1� � v'i s -1 ca > 46 � flJ . � CtA �SS ys ttvyll����Y1�� x- w M M C al J-- in cu tU V 'G. t!} u _ #D 4, S ' 41J } s, 1li�ti t/a cr tY5 G7 LtC to t! 2.` of }1} At11 tt y� t, I I I,4�,tl�i,;�f�ltttj�f s i sit(i(ls�its t1}'�l t Its l t I „isle h .. OD 0 r -. ry M u` N oz Q 00 to 00 0 rn � c a c 0 cu I , (u o a m xt > mCJ V) VS °n m 1 '^ 0 c c > . a o o m 00 t r a W m m a m m c °^ m m m a m ,n "ct' 4- 4- Z;; 4- y 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-� 4- 4- 4-: 4- 4- 1,- t V P, Gc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0' 0 0 0 W y 0 41 a 0 0 O iv p 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0J 0 Q O G 41) vJ c in Vt t] GJ V) 0 � Z' v1 V) VJ Z CG Z w Z rq Z V) V) en *' u u a a tr sy .i m I 4 t( co tY ? a M * '�C. . (,7 iYA C C c tt7 i C pp a a a > t3 jr) c m G3 L J v u £6J Lf.. * 0 m W " *�." V5 tf3. CL C) a "- i� p �C O co � p � 4C3 � � � � Q O O �� O 4}'iifJ cf u u g tau 0 m 0 � � 0 0 i0 T: 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vs Z Z in Z w^ toZ m ,Z © V) 0 Q 0 4 Vk Z' V7 Vr Z ac , 4 { C� �1 � � E E E rn w m 0 0 rJ N Nv J i 4 � 00 i�il "4 0 OD N Ln 41 41 ? t71 CU 0 }i+�Ss 1kSt i ci gt Q ti 0 0 0 �,£ iS 1SiltS� �t lj t0 C3 w 4+ (D (D W „ .C. .. .c „C z3 41 +- Si + 4+ +1 R N u,. , O. C C c m M C) r totA '+. m 4A Q C C C C CL - Q1 •w m tsO £i it s£iCt31!s�1 S 44� 4— 4- 4— 4— 4— 4�—o 0; c� c� 0 o a o41 £ fl O "C Q Q U U Z tp Z m z 0 -1 S � ( 1 �'r i7t tlb Cyt 11 £ 'a EA to CA to ,1s t, llsi£iittll ) ' � r 4 i 1 � 00 �— s s st - \ Yam} cI} k.fl... `,cam.ca m t� y rltri£,tr+r s sss7�'tssi i�,�57{r� h+Yi � "x W (n U) U) 2 S S S us t�sfl us as s l ��,��i tt{{r:s4NN16tP?Y�i s V ttl/j} �t c5 O O o N N N N N t t tr'FS1rtrJ:°;{J,tf}1f`'(`l � N + r-i £y} C3 ME 1-4 { ri IA }Jlrllf Y'{r,,� t (i, k G c iffy 111f1}�i ZiJtlst}4{�� tt ui - z � 46 Ln 1 s J , s 111� )p � is�lt}sis; i �S 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E r u u t xi O o © o tT 4R tD f-- ca 9 1 �r{ C4 rrtt t{i tS� e � 11. t � 1 � i t)ttilt , SO"I'll" �11 t J� t j i lSii sit}rNS'}r�ltS�t�3 �{a��4��{ f{{4{ ht)�� � �'� J Milk�t f�, '14i� i ' tiC1 00 -yy� ri rt1 04 C) m! N "' N E ko 00 rf eneb,I �stt f, Lri +rl m CA Ln N N N GO v , + ��}I �}}{ 4-0 <, 0'. C2 y, o QT p 41 ,t fcc O uj cc Z Iel 41 0 to *0 M Q }11�1 }`'tj biO _! Ua CS L t0 cR c r f7 cry s/f' Gyp w Ott(tt�� 11 ,fit `- 7 tiS O ram` E E E E r , Y i <'' at t i�tqq Y k i = = s ca n. m ION INtl,�V r t I�sr l3t�slr}ty Vd�t4�� 1 �� 4 J W I OL OL " } G l7i t Q? C7 t r 3 � 3 = tU x — N fJ 0 m { CL7 t l t ZCL 0 a Z U :D U co ,I 't 3 !S� r 'ti rr3�3 1 t r 3 r'a n Sa'�S}Sr4�kr� r �t�Ss�4�ir��4 A I �s4��F31\49 i 3 t11��r� � YII i f;(r 4 1)tt}{si t iN1�44�r tP �J•lip t ��4 WWI -�It t(htS�11s3 t����5{4�IIt��l ,��Irf t3 itllsrts�w.,�3��� E\ V A ^�� . 00 LO ) G El Q t5 KS id V+ D 4 d yk« � ft �Y i — st4ts I Z s 1111}IS 1 1145v !t t� } •�- ��l4{ lit 01- t t S4�St��}S qn� (0 [ l a� � OD f ti� � [� t s t; 3, } ,t !s! +{G y sn Est sl ii t ssit� moo —A s i�ili's t �stsl s t s 4 i{ffss�itlir�s'm s iF Act t t s All: t s ty i rA s � cr 4444 � s'i�sisl sthli�iswL}��t�III� E rr i�'tss t��EAI} t f- 1t� }st{7r}is+s�1ittllti`\il�1i(It�42��� l �'�st� ��.� y � t t + I rt! ;1t yt Ui,tii}t�J lP�� t,ti i �t vnu - s { t yrst\�lS�tl(�If��r thun„q t�� r ,lts t S s, - r��i) }`Pv`tlfi��Cf11iv�pl`S�4{rl� ; � , \ r f t c- s ,1�1''�}1��131�. 440 001 you (� Sti�i�1s'�}III}f s p n i( t � + (i s}7tit�l jr jl�ci��lslif��I��I�� t i - t ' 1 i rr�lt s�111?'slFr'�}15�� 3 1 q� 3 � - !+ (S s \4 ' II t { i S iss rttrlr,�5yjil I 1 C d ,,( itd. S 1 i 41'�l� 9�a, if •��3 1 r` �rprtssi(!i r 1 iI t S�}S iii t's�1 yrt�1 f1t3g�11j1�t�ti�il Uti� �. �� ` , z i t 5j Rfi t - �1 111�I 0l1 - t 5 - t �y , I i }} 1 y) A S My jo vim MY t�£ t41 1�{ r{"�l"�� �5 - N n� - rr - ,� - gi} S 1 )1 4 � fifi , ,p AdftL A Ilk EML Aw(D mob— opal -------------------------------------- - i i SS U rs } }( �1 r y' y� Von U, 70*AT Q!M , 10 a.: r cil �Uul PC now Qt ASS Isis gt ' It to z cr 7 ' , lot NMI , - iiis r Sr Jrsir4sl�}{�iStir s4is �4 Sell _ � r -- is y+Srd iiiv�iit{i} t�y4 � t i {Yf y4 9 i e 0 � 4i f , e 4 4l � • 4 !4� 11► i_ f r i(r s� a � �- r 'Na ♦ rl a � i k � a ti i �. t stJ t��srs�A4��'1�'� _ � � +IM, • i r , r�i 1�1 t }} r� tlIr v rir rr 4 1� I a 4b s 3� sh {4 ' it�E 5�i�i�f,��l�} @ � py A► � t 4b - 6,, • • w► 46 s t,i �1�i 1 4I''�4 � ��1 � � ,� ♦ y Sb ss;4uyilll� h� ry is f its i0f 0���1s1 �� a t o a e � a • a r s a � I a i r} L Q1 i E C\l 0 M 1 t, i t i yy� i i 11� { (1 fltW SON lot A lag 11 WIN? t }sr i!�i{�l���ff���'k1 y. a tyr YOU PRIA NO ZR s,z`i ���\{� a "' • R' w I n r�rt{ ��}14 t14�� r, Woo l a "14 �������h9��� a tU,�\ "0. ,'t�1 III'`w1$)"� t y i,t �t 1�{ { i1 pp as t�I t1 3 jet 6 a Y my"MTV t �' , `r7 I iii$t IS �� � s► °� v� 11W � r tt} a !t it2t{11�t�S�{t�tUl 1\�1�� n L Q1 i E C\l 0 M i 111 f i ,i3 it il�tii}ss,ts,'sz`"� 1}ti � i� t t i it�s��ii,t�l�}tt'1��}`�SjS�, � • f rl(S ,it�viY}�1�� r r ,t dill u r 3i t t titihi t, i(1 i 1 iSn4t Ititi )i f,� .� i ttl"lir„ui,t A,AI 11At�2 � tlY rw pt i f pp I' 1 Is`\l1l�rtj�tG��Y��r� t� ) � � p► i t L Q1 i E C\l 0 cr M St t, � "rtstt��\�lt{t It i sr att r , ` t I4 I I ��: r► ��stt ,itt(s I e +pr t '� tilt(fi y4t{tt�������� ��� - �� � i► }ty1t�\Sit,itl��i�lli� t. � �ttvyr,{it ily4 L Q1 Ak E C\l 0 cr M � +,Iis � sit+{it'Jrtitil`3���t�l"! a fl\t{u`1 � � ( i S t I�f�5 7 1�l�lrif t� 4b SWIM My W_Q TOWN AS t 17y ,si�sit��t{issV)}��1�J'` �sst;'fi Uhy�(4�r i�t��b nl'Sri t��i t 5 , it I7 t5ilt;li tyis\15\ tli{r j�11''lt ( u {t t(3(i {SIt�F i i �1� {is �4,i � � i► §rr s r '�'{3i\(�i}��� III � • r S4Ah i'i 'hots4 }1�) ae � s: i si"lir„uri SPs�ssittlisr��y F � � � � s \ s 4b i °b 1 i,1 , 5 1lsr s 19 �� L Q1 i • M _- ' s ! tt ��1\V`t iffsVAl l�(sl�� s' 1t7�J t i�,t� ii t Ii t ` aF, ��t 4 t �tV1�isfs���{s�f�iii I p}�` �E � �► � � { G � is i t�'r�ir��u+rs SP`1�'4tltst a 6 III it�S {SI St Sj tlf�t I e it trft�lt;{ '�r�Il��fff313fi�il�� � # �lf2latl�4�ll�pil5�jl�u�} t. w � ° — fftllh(C�;f�� L Q1 irr i • •rrr� • rrr�r r. i l Pay 0 (rpl �rN { i„ t trs i ti, € s��t+�s��l`fi�r�` t {r� ti is'1s`ru s� UJ{Ir;s Q�1J��iltll�l�s C s {tSr Ir{' 4{ 4{liS ii���t1���1f�s>` s irJtt s tt WHO www s i ;dr MEN s f i js \tjs rtli){)1��11�i1 "41}� ��� -ywn 160, I s St k5 (6 i�)tl I t tbl s rr,t iiiiii � ,s s1�sr y ,,,jjjf4�b'�I�IIII 'ami i}S �0ts1{rr#} iV� — ,r l - �! - t�tttlltir, t „1 ;sirlsl{{ , t ttfq�ly,I� I I It � E l t i 114 Wa ( l y'a . t v y P t rr, � t st 11 11t t � )St tt IISy�ili}4i1� J � y�it(�51174vi�1�61 �I �l n t ry I}�i yl�t}} vt � 1�1,, `v k" �v, .,,,,„•_' ��1V4�IIl� v ` 1 ! r Ili tZP, tt t i' .......... 1 On s } s - �� - I"stlttl�ltl��� � t �F r ra. ti l ,- tt t 1 tr t y i� s t I, s t�ttst 7 r 2 J lit r as v a tst�tM t y} tt�tt\�S4 �t � r � is yy� Isl f f - 1t ��� rN r 1C f - t {;3 ,i�i1 i7i11(t4Ss ����1 Y1 F � tl{tit�t ?�rl y tt tr tSt�t t�i r)�rr t�lt�t t � iy �i,«iriy t U {1 4���� •2� � � - y�>Ytti't�h",S}W1Urttl4l�ty� I �� r � y4 tii. }i�iytl �tRt��i)sf _ t f - t „t �yris} r � r ;t ri,ii)��Z��4Zl i � t .•_ ,� r tttiY)) tsUs4,} � r tri - � -- i�t4llsirt WV%OFr yr lrI� ��IS JJ1 1 `�ii 1 F YOU Lot PU Von I Z�r cf- 11`1illri - �1 iv`'• Yr `!� xr' i u 1 l F j v}tt�F�aj lS�1 S 4� vi j - la t I - r - s t rr 3tr b ��i 11� �11 Itr t , ttll ! t r S£t 11 - � it{f ,tt ryal� lr � �f� r t tit i k 1 r�3j P�tft`tilt!�r t viF I} r, � C F I t. -— i' ti:+ i( if is}i��i11S;•fti�fl��� i;(Y Ph� � t � 5 r a liS�d�}1f�t�lk�h��jt �GSUi zv � ` � rtsr4 s i ti ti5 � \ � �I t �ii ii, I uuuuuuu°uuu(ii,yfY� , r sl 4yt�li - yt is r�s s t i tSS1�r1 7�tS its l�i� ���tS"'ttX' is ssS l+z�t�sJlttili i�'IS `9 �"`ra y r � t I ty'y�iitfl`�rf11 �, r � 5 `�f��ss s�1 tSJil t r it i ``Is;{rr'�s1s1�S�Ys� tt X a� n' r 5 P ss1 ii f q1J t� P� " ,4 t1tF lr (I t i 4 � i, a s. FYD gyp" t C R $$ A I si tlilris 't - ,:too RAMS - t , � �i�'l'si\{{isi4,+�\\t i}�������t3f _ x i•. � �iaa 335 -- s 1 Ilq k(ftilst is» }`�) ter. c i �f� t T {•1 1 tr�( tr T v �k�� w- f(, itlit�t t� {Tn � f� if �Irr; � s - �t���it 4� r 4�) '`� I! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '>2 li r!7 �'i''jt!f'i}i��t;til� }2) '�' � - _ ''�� 1 1 j';IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2 r} t\���fiiiyit`2��2ts23y111 sS � �a yVti'(1f2�9�l2kiitlfiti��!) ` � f E2 i yy �111ffffffl, i i I h 2 t Ifflt�llU 2s�Si thi3y �� ",��'� � 2 3J Y �2 �, 32t 1tY - E oil q; HAT APIA t 2 (t l�li t�s112�i1 �t t - e. i - tt . 2 i isi t) st ttiS�sa i `x t. ' -- 1 f 4 ii! { ijt'i1 i}sii ,pit tttf a}}�f?y ��� ,a i 7 471,��1Y213tVtt!��Ti�tf� �f '�tGii�t4s2Y d � � � �til'~v�i}si�il6if!�#ut�s� -- - t r it �'' r ' t�iiirii,t,334� y11t t� sfsFr� \} 4i s41S{i 113s�l4is 1S t i s t4'it4lrt,�it�lll��������1ttr - - - t�44 - sf I call , its lost SAM apt OTT CAP { scuts{} III} _77 t3� {f 2 (t s ii�tslsi'{�SsS}��i�sr)SIS���� ?fi91`� {1F " Q it t isli t���i �i �Qt t i1 (srt 114s sh 1{4 � f < c s s li 1�t �sf��11 IU` f �4 is41s} s S t�lAt c ittot{1 I a - 4 W tOt,' �45ti4'' tta�ju11 wits ASQ �SXs s�+cc 4 I,t4 ttf';�"�1)4s s}sussii34� �m � `: it`s'`lff�l'i➢r�1� ����t{4 spar � I l iit{t'fi{it4;t 4�;�`���trttt n1111Yc st}, _ - If yt,its'��sQt t�lll'�Ssi(u�mr>� - i i SS U rs } }( �1 r y' y� Von U, 70*AT Q!M , 10 a.: r cil �Uul PC now Qt ASS Isis gt ' It to z cr 7 ' , lot NMI , - iiis r Sr Jrsir4sl�}{�iStir s4is �4 Sell _ � r -- is y+Srd iiiv�iit{i} t�y4 � t L Q1 wmew CL Cr •se® � I - } SO A AS AM a It t t u ;r iss srtl�tlitr(S3i��1 "',��1 � R�r�k- { f{ t s. tits itf3y�tf rm 111� s= i t 7 � - 1w+ ro,s s1 S s 1 r _y sr4tr tt�_y?Sri�y'2� (2:�1 t r s tt;�1��}���� E t� � i � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII kk 'f }3'ti6 T s � \Ih r �� r s4rr ' tU�i, r)tyyvv��trl � 7 r � r s lil ��1}5 g1111II�11 -� t �- }ll;` � s. i POO IR WAM in r r � st4r��r ry{ r 1�IIPttPalml�� � rH:v1 +rs�trir�)u •lZ � �t�'aN1 I `fr � " � � - y p ty now ' norr ITS WKS V- solo A "AWN LIM mg own 3 � i 9l a Ulstr`rstlYi('t�rS�>,r�I l 14 r it i�t;t I1 t � - - - r — i - 1 rr � 7 tr)\j4 llrli��1 -Ir1 114S��1 titr I - ,'i S - � - ftl` rrr,>tiltr;y�sr PS?1�YrY�"t �i1lll�stsr�'� ��� a tr i;i ti tu�3t sn 11 Q�li � rrr•t{r };)tI?1 t�?t4�}7�Z�?{� �`��i�� t ��3� � l rtjjiSlt4`'Isfl4 "i}�t15�1 ��� > "! F v v ft++ y S il ii iI�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��I �+, � + u TA i s ` + t n 4 7 i t ttsfl Alt�S#} �fzaa' kg� D ( l f � tra �- C} N 1 a ,r �- �{ ttktt��it -•`: t 4 n c}t�€� if�-- - --� 1' c 4, P - � III { - s, milli" L .® asoddp Albuoj4S 4— •— Ln E O 0 CL -�-� 4joddn S Albuoj4S L N cdsoddo AIbuoj4S 4-1 0 m " o C1) cn 0 0 _0 0 "' joddruoy � S AlI 4S L asoddo AlbuoilS 4-J o 4-J o 21 jEb �3 m o rf,`,`;1', CL joddnS AlbuoilS CL �.. L N804 4- asoddo{i lbU0,145 4-+ 4-1 CD 4 �t tlj 4-+► l ._ m ;{, jaddnS Ajf3uojjS 4. .� tl� v � 01, . ' (,' asoddo Albuoil r c' �ssr 4-J 44- ,„,j, L- 1 .�. E J, , �E r+ �t wV s'4-0 � t y t �� t ��'� o d x a 0A A �,Z i t q u `^ 2 o Cl O C7 i,�• S itla Sl�j ii S(4iti2}!>if��1l������ -� f m CL 1 i ma, °. a� ! s511rtuili��V�t1� jl,trrnl/lt��V ,i� c� kil ,f t cu , ILtt, CoVZi�� � o, c F y, tit\ -hJ tra t3 Sm L"TIT .......... Now 4a OF .01A 1 oil„ CL t ':j C3 mf 1 a ,r �- { ttktt��it -•`: t 4 n c}t�€� if�-- - --� 1' WAS c vi 4, P - � III { - s, L N • asoddo AIbuoj4S F a m 4-J 0 ��,r 70 �3 '-J i u CL d jjoddnS AIbuoj4S 4-J i, y - f - t � �1' )9 iStyl\yt �Il S44 i �v i - '" t - i - y - y � r y t {{ y\ y J ty,t`ty y}Silliiiy � t �� �� 71�i{ll ftt 1� i➢ _4! p " � u r ity i,j r y 4• L"i Lct 4s✓ L"TIT .......... NowSm OF .01A CL 1 oil „t `;j C3f 103WAS ,r �— p I ftI i ({ } syt�ll��i'iiiil�l�l�l t t{kt�it -•`: t 4 n c}t�€� if�-- - --� 1' c s,`4s I, 4, 4S si � P III { - s, asoddo Albuoj4S 4a 4-J > 4-J 7C) 0 0 0 L. 4-J 0II CL :E ` ,s ..._ CL 4joddnS Albuoj4S > L N �t�a���u� Raan 804 t1t�t� •� .�. f7C30 CD .111.1.11 Y oil 4) 4-1 .0 -f-+ CL :tj .® Lo - i i SS U rs } }( �1 r y' y� Von U, 70*AT Q!M , 10 a.: r cil �Uul PC now Qt ASS Isis gt ' It to z cr 7 ' , lot NMI , - iiis r Sr Jrsir4sl�}{�iStir s4is �4 Sell _ � r -- is y+Srd iiiv�iit{i} t�y4 � t L Q1 it •mmwm i C111- • •wwwr ,tf b72t{7ritlt�f(is}f �, r i}�y,Is 1p,�r{it41s}�15� I� Fc �, vlt q'',la r1r �. Of NO N t `'} its {�\�'i•,li„+}�ti�\1�� � - � �}�� �}��� \� {� � �� It \, �ttjl +4fi I u,,r nt\S1ti�'� t� x j v {'if�4Nf �4i(i1}�\ �(�S��1� � }���� {{i Use— Amu (� } l i' �I�r,f i�1�7(t•'\'l (� wnr - 2 - f � - ' f� }S�Nt" i - '� \������� tliS�t i4,��� — r , '` 4-4 41 CL t° 3 I - s ��- r - `4 s , r ,r r y s 's};y'�11,r,�AYrt�l}Yi'aa1u�. �f , �I l�ajj�tytn�,�`145�,�1r} - s - - L N6304 > tt�ill to 4v a �� l�?�lrt�b\t vv vt tt4(1 ' •� � � h 1�t`� \ji r t {\i?i t 4-J � titet�t t- y?tlt f \1 OCL ._. T O ♦ _° V4 Ila7�, G rt i, 4 e i1 t Iif?� yy t \ t l i JIM !"s srt,�}}+�U�)�\t�4�ti���Ukk{� t •'s - v i + + .'fsm }tf� ti v 1�1+ in } } (11 { 4 - � 44 W W . "� Sm L"TIT .......... Now 4a OF .01A 1 oil„ CL t ':j C3 mf 1 a ,r �- {-+ ttktt��it -•`: t 4 n c}t�€� if�-- - --� 1' c 4, P - � III { asoddo Albuoj;S O) o 4-J 4-J 4-J V) 4-J 4-J 4-J 4-- E E 0 2 E 2 2 0 E 0 0 4-J 4-J 4-1 c 0 0 C; 4-J 0 0 0 0 0 > C). ;joddnS AlbuoilS C .c 4.j 4-J -0 4-0 4-J ............... 0 -0 C%- CL MAY tOR' ? k t ,v, FOS \fill ��- r nun. �, iwhy ,t,f l l llf �( , Not NOW Mil s Pat - +;r l its illll a 11 1 P W�'p i t its 14t — r , '` 4-4 41 CL t° 3 I - s ��- r - `4 s , r ,r r y s 's};y'�11,r,�AYrt�l}Yi'aa1u�. �f , �I l�ajj�tytn�,�`145�,�1r} - s - - t t U T' � u w�wz z Y j�r ) tail i vt �ri`ti��tt'i si'si si si ii si si s-i si si sus si ��St A�l�ss,zs s s ssssss,i s s s ssssssss s s sssssss s s sssssss>s s sk„a�11 T •( •� • l •�w • •mwn tl; r G t. gg in v l y Vvv sy r vr�' rr m �� low iwraint all Wj f �1! "W" - '' , u l f L � a,s r a t v Ss� +,- ,rtyit',r — r , '` 4-4 41 CL t° 3 I - s ��- r - `4 s , r ,r r y s 's};y'�11,r,�AYrt�l}Yi'aa1u�. �f , �I l�ajj�tytn�,�`145�,�1r} - s - - l y 1 s � i t t y+tiil� r;li ! N '„il3tii+�t�1�'t`11i�����i11� �� \'� k,yin �-•. tt ,y � sr I l sisl�li�irisk 1�t �iI t I s ii}ls !� t � j1 i + i ( �'tt rr {slit 1`issS`\� h�ii"��tii �t it st) sS t�s'1}{l�riji�U�lt�`�si}�J 911 V �IItv�r ss li it/ . Su;i s}{�i�`l siS;t�tti�tli ril tit Us i�l isS4{t�Sli�sfnia�l'li{�tr il{s�i sil tl l i(irf'(t tlis}ril t�S rl`11�{it4`i 5-.lsl�tl titi(f�i ti�q(snt}l 1 iliu{r(i/i"Jlitl`it;l_sisi i('si sti iri{i�{ti 11l l��yl st�Ul r Ji ttit fi�s iAiU{i�tssys ii ittylI`l,l}S siSs 1!l � •� �l ii 1i tti4till i,�t,41i+ � ti ��f 1t, i;{ r ti;� 4l{tit`t t'l��i{t 'lltrs tttilrsi°�'ts)i}{` sir iS)i ���is lsi� ? r S' ilis s it i tl llr r(+/ \ti ii ss{fist�s} s i }tilt i1 i nisi ail vls t till{ss s{i}(�i tS �Usi\rs ti si;it is ti si;i,!(isi i�)/s vtAli--i�`liltt'ti ti ti ii ti ti t-i ti ti tit ti tltt; Asl:iss,zs s s ssssss, s s s ssssssss s s sssssss s s sssssss>s s ss,�a�11� • • - 4,, •� •, t II' 1 � 4 1t5 tt_fs�{,it stir{lS1�S��� - r k+l! SitS(f`r,s�l�rf3l�{��II� »�ttPJJJt' � � 1s(11,11)vs � F — t dd i t J S I�Il41 R\,� t pI 8- p� / u, I1S y1 ors 1\��� �1�11i ltr l'si}i��1 1 �� Astr�ty�ls v }s11r,1 s �S 1 {SSb1� �t�ilFtrr�\j S r� i(1t1ys; y� zi� -_- ���}} t{ryll���`�yir}jest }(y =- s 4 �� si1t`t1t} }r`yfiR yiS s ii />tr y �S! - III r � V� 5 f l�� r y, �� iJ 15i r 1"tS'� � 11 �'��s lytiyr, r l yst } lug���13�V1Y r t' y 4 S R iYt � r lS J1 t lt,t itr2ss .} s(ttisyr r, � E �r ' �;�Vitz tS'��i7ll��s � �+• `i �y } e 7 Ir1 4 iii Wd GG to Wd 0[ "u Wd 6 *woman" Wd 9 Wd L Wd 4 Was i �tlt�y Wd Wd r IN � th �r !1 rtf t r t rt it i ATifd",F.e�. ti�1WII ,� 1r 4,7 s t iyr � Qir}rt�t,t�}�tr{�T�t�'�)�� Sl1 ➢ ,__ it r� f�tp�Sr r ii ri 4i�l rti��t wvOt Ii�� WV r�y rrr�?�1t'�yiv }T �r I r t tviitah��l} 7p Wv v �F 7sd1�71 }1{ ark# s \ �11' Wv c W'v 1 ttkt auNl A4no++.r (elW A# s t� Apa nlc' d +tt �iS}iNiy PtitR t 11���)fUr Y: ar ft,t4l hi h ,, h z ear --OWN - 1t� , t�� (� � '�•• '4' NiI�MIMI�MMlMMM1MMlIMMMMIM 1� �S�til Ssja0, S i Rp�N 1> t 1 2it���tr f3 ' :I31 ml IIIIII t i 4 ��� _ ,,1 r,£ytS/4Syi,��y�itlttStSlllllllll t s �i , S� }tt � � iE ",1t;` ip ttt .� �riwrrrirr mom 1 „t ,�/r�is£titi :) 1 rr t {r r1 It rntl i� YAW N RA bw �R� ' s a} rt s � }���� �� }r4s3tr)��� �i1 t5 lrl}i� - � 111 s iP t rt }i, r , r tr t � 0 ism £ post s � m . C4 500 `t rsiti$�`l�ti�� 9 Y Y m i £ t. rt co - c1 s A, I tt s r r �Dj 1st�ttt'(t�n��j� 4"i6, Ak. t'� Z}�t111111}ter e � t��` � s t i £, t rritirll�r$ t�lt� ? t' rse eat - -r ae �1li�4\}d'\G fit(Yt iV£4{�,,7ss's r ,try£i sry\r( } l iI7,,;I s r��£ 1t r r�ter t���4Y1� '}��r£d {i3 ����� s •_T s r s,� ii � till r � , ii r rrt i �it s t �� l� ��}Trrt?t � SI t � 11!ifill � £ t� � � 17 t�i\,'fy(ks}'Ittrt ����lllUl lliiill� �� 'I {•�} s r S�t \ � i 2s - i lip s tvv{J�._.vatstA\ tt fr'r v} r - a \ it ifrRt 1` rjtaitl � . BIMINI Roo C mm i - Waco— ma IM , i #A r v d Cowl "t ittt lv1Ar}ty\} tlVi ", e = r ii t t rt t }tst j�ytjjt lrl�t{}} i�G 'v41 it S i st 4 wllr4A1�1tA�t) �..`� - 4 - l i )t IAf rt�� }rr tt$��Svriy�t it Wrl} ttr t LOWs 1(t� uut V �i t l+-;✓ f Sr(t t �V �\\��)1 ,�3 �0 - -� t )��� `ri•lUsvA+vtll (vr , t wont MICK +ata 41 44 tIN Kf Now { oust ft t{ LAI =-- v - i s . ) r rlti 5 S� 41�1asv tDY � � � � t I t rt J}I I)r f I i VA 7 it rt sv 1�4i4`Sv? r - � s 1 rvtt i1�1 v rt�ivtr r�� r { t at 1 a „ rrn t"'12y1tsi y�,� - , t- t I , r ,p t s{ilt?1tl(��fl(3t��I to ty� - s` t moo t "4'sawm �s lt��` 1 � � � f "4•� "�' i '0 1`nvrt ,fi�sjtt WWMQ t y sy,{tt4£j���i sf)�1���1�t t s}'' ) - ` 1 \" rp - 1 k �w (t , S,i i t 2 si , = r ) i�,ty,�i 1i ?}t}444 rrrlt}�tit t3},1„`,; <I7" .Mr- ;vv}?ivy t�s14sv v� ! t � �S� i a%o l� 1�,�,f � t ��„? to<11 s11„ �s �x y"y u s w moos t - � `,t , tf2'y,�„it{, �,����t15��4}1���r�n��� _ � �' era•' .� is�sttys mamma k6`.l 46 �'g , :tM\ ( \ 41 s tt� ���Ai7 \1� r alitt}I`\\Jti``!4b}(1 X2ta tin SZO glib ttI$I}ttstt i' � � � :po' � �y`tttr�it+a�jltlti�),1?t�42�i l`Al milli! III �- MiIMNIN� mummommm 5 oil, Ao W its Spla +rp + tt yy qi4 i't�t1i�21j�1(�37�t1 w, } ,4„i: pany,r i s s v\�s 4ltti s}its}v � v Sv r� I Slt suit u r Fl;»„ .,i t �Stir ti)A'�������1����� ��t, �`1.".:'"`��tt .�#t�i• °`� _ "�" � r;. 1}ss 1i' i<}�i�:i} t "01 . 7777777, OWN ON to m r a 7S i qr f{{{tti � 2 aw t s } t � - i, s j't s �s s , ! � � t is iqr}Fitts � mitts i pw ��ii,,,!i ✓ � t(��,�s��t}t���ivi��t�5� �S m�_� - � 1 't s�ll i7�}�1A�� ������t£�} t x r �, i 422isi tilif �fl�l� yq} zt ;Il �(il Siitl}�24t t� i R �t2}s,)t rltl�l$t � }lt �i `) J ti ,tfZ ls•� �t ;- _- ' �sril am i ta� s NONNI „1 01 - VIA On? � S Tom } s est(w 1Su J v> vrttl \ v ri �11 { sJ to Boom to C4 so It NOON Pa An Atom Ut vw(a, S�J t!t+ � r c � S\��n€ - ' C'V M 4'4 t t� to AZT co , co 47 �c i : .0, 1311} �y rt��S}l�fttalvsl� cilyt f , i� - 1 rwt l� lli it, � - `i+`�i`�a+ ' r �v 1� *10 MY Not Al"I"I"11,11i IS Oct to so HAI" Alpi sf rf .av�`t,r�F ARPAN I gill\11' �J � f�tisr t y r j SIR 40 AT ss 1!+ y+�}�iV \+� �i„-..r - -- �. In v,��y�>S�wv4t 1 ;,'r y}, �? r� r ++}yftjrf}1��>,+i4�lff �� }a ENO rovpo— s SAO Not _i r No SPUR �s+{'+ NMI OVY L09Z - v1` sfut�,l{�111u++o+r�i+h4�� MMIIMIMMIMMMMNI�MM�M1Ms 9Z .9Z sZ?Z TZ Z Z iZ-OZ ` r tf �tf yt�f uiif!l:� ca OZ-61 4g� p 04 � � '` s 1++Sli}1�i +r`������IJI��\+;i�!�1� S;•��i�� - ,a� .i t s y i,+i'r i{� '���i ,.4 ",Mon! Awl, WHO (moo hIf{Qi ! }\It f \1A ) i+l�����}� i���it�}yj����i,lS}�+++�Si r i�� so mamma ye vz Z-t 1�� OR It NOUN MONSOON � �^ _ 2 iiii MwYIWMIM�IYYWIWMI IMMOMOMMI roc' a. 46 s,t� ri� ,y,}y ��<sht�4s,;'s Illsykdss4 ct } h UAT - t TOO , 5}{���y}�� u # (,iM1ii� a i `r y7ri ,t4eit"fit} �r�yt`, ' i � r jti 40 toMOONSitOWN NMN womom , oMMVWMIYUW mom solo 10 st ,S �tv {fitft���fyt1N14f�3� C> , t �(r MAX ,C`etF 1)({ �) )1),1 yr jr �1 r Fy v,BMW" �.- t {f ���,1',� s „1 , t stylsrss t to, SWOON M�! is£1 ✓ f�f 1 s �� t ,�T� s i lit i Soni 1 £ £s .I4 k411�S1tt�£�di sNS -.��. t s:'1sl �il��ll��� 4l�s�t l)y£st�� s. ,,; ', tt s��ls3£1� r #.is _ - _ 1 i Sr�} Ii��l �1r S , S ( t \t 1 low 'Ir £��stl�sssl�slt$�littl Iss r s j� t �y a1woms "d"Q VON- " 11 iti �� s p 41 0 4'1 G to 0 N1 I t ,z 4£1 t s1�tU£sl tsy rr VIA NOR room -4 INS wwwwwwwas il�lll f�{i{,t�£I y� t ..yfy a ii��"AI � I 1 £I 77 t{ � j l{ 1 slit �+t+ I l r i ;e s lid m�� 1� all ,tiJ�,,l�7££11 Sf11S1�i71£t ��,£�}1 I£f Ids �l�lir 1,�£ �£ *,} t 1 It r£t r 1' M oil 9811, bABA-0 KAI \1 �Is�(�I 114 s,�7��>�����t,���l ll�'�1•�� F\ �-_ €„ � ,1, '�"�, � t•9 � Jf. wa' r ON � i�,n�tY��ihils�Y�£119���� � `"� ` ��� C•'gyp tug 0 C> cv — � M S4 � 'vex f , £P i 4�1 p lyliii , - 1 , 1 t..� li�� } 4,t?����� t<l APPENDIX E — Crash Data Summary Tables and Maps Crash Data Summary Tables State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 18.587 01/02/14 Thu 1210 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 15.350 01/02/14 Thu 1245 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 33.775 01/04/14 Sat 1325 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 4 15.217 01/05/14 Sun 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 5 1.252 01/05/14 Sun 1140 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 6 22.592 01/05/14 Sun 1205 Tree(Standing) 0 2 0 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 9.767 01/O5/14 Sun 0425 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 8 11.902 01/06/14 Mon 0730 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 9 18.266 01/06/14 Mon 2035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 9.729 01/06/14 Mon 0005 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 28.922 01/08/14 Wed 1405 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 12 21.517 01/08/14 Wed 0810 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Improper Backing 13 0.611 01/09/14 Thu 2224 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 14 26.910 1 01/10/14 Fri 1551 Rear-End 0 1 3 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 18.899 01/10/14 Fri 1740 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 8.131 01/11/14 Sat 1436 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 27.616 01/11/14 Sat 1520 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 18 34.775 01/11/14 Sat 0715 Fence 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 27.714 01/11/14 Sat 1440 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 30.114 01/13/14 Mon 1205 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 21 19.989 01/13/14 Mon 1100 1 Backed Into 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 22 14.151 1 01/16/14 Thu 1619 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 25.581 01/16/14 Thu 1731 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 24 7.899 01/17/14 Fri 1940 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 26.005 01/18/14 Sat 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 18.147 01/19/14 Sun 1532 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 27 23.645 01/19/14 Sun 2019 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 27.504 01/20/14 Mon 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 9.236 01/21/14 Tue 1551 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 30 35.775 1 01/21/14 Tue 2253 Embankment 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 31 17.944 01/22/14 Wed 1411 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 32 25.547 01/22/14 Wed 2127 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 33 7.820 01/23/14 Thu 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 34 8.709 01/23/14 Thu 1859 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 12.729 01/23/14 Thu 0500 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 36 18.298 01/25/14 Sat 2010 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 30.777 01/25/14 Sat 1946 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 31.498 1 01/25/14 Sat 1240 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 26.264 01/26/14 Sun 1522 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 40 33.775 01/26/14 Sun 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 41 27.504 01/27/14 Mon 1625 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 42 13.257 01/27/14 Mon 1438 Guardrail Face 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 43 16.368 01/27/14 Mon 2138 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 25.603 01/27/14 Mon 1601 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 45 13.392 01/29/14 Wed 1740 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 46 30.992 1 01/29/14 Wed 1253 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 47 24.399 01/29/14 Wed 1641 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 29.104 01/30/14 Thu 0651 Right-Turn 0 1 0 1 Day Wet I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 28.669 01/30/14 Thu 1057 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 50 9.729 01/30/14 Thu 1211 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 51 9.965 02/04/14 Tue 0720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 9.223 02/04/14 Tue 1001 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 29.004 02/04/14 Tue 1220 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 54 33.275 1 02/04/14 Tue 1705 Bridge Rail 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 30.308 02/04/14 Tue 1050 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 56 10.743 02/09/14 Sun 1650 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 23.333 02/12/14 Wed 2112 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 58 23.886 02/13/14 Thu 1609 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Improper Backing 59 26.564 02/13/14 Thu 1255 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 60 8.065 02/14/14 Fri 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 9.165 02/14/14 Fri 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 24.588 02/15/14 Sat 1325 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 63 8.554 02/15/14 Sat 1907 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 64 27.532 02/16/14 Sun 1715 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 28.117 02/16/14 Sun 1918 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 66 31.066 02/18/14 Tue 0100 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 67 10.024 02/19/14 Wed 1450 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 68 30.261 02/20/14 Thu 0130 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 69 8.241 02/21/14 Fri 2324 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 33.775 02/22/14 Sat 1628 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 20.953 02/22/14 Sat 2131 Angle 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 72 27.504 02/23/14 Sun 2055 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 73 18.930 02/23/14 Sun 1627 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 9.729 02/23/14 Sun 2100 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7S 14.SS9 02/23/14 Sun 1040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 27.254 02/24/14 Mon 1155 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 77 25.828 02/24/14 Mon 1145 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 78 31.208 02/26/14 Wed 0805 Rear-End 1 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 38.639 02/27/14 Thu 1545 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 80 25.828 02/28/14 Fri 0735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 81 7.829 02/28/14 Fri 0905 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day_ Wet I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 82 19.131 03/01/14 Sat 2215 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 83 25.399 03/01/14 Sat 0015 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 33.775 03/01/14 Sat 1025 Fell/jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 85 25.967 03/01/14 Sat 1945 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 86 27.254 03/02/14 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 23.029 03/02/14 Sun 1725 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 88 18.449 03/03/14 Mon 0910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 25.667 03/03/14 Mon 0942 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 90 27.985 03/06/14 Thu 0606 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 91 6.247 03/06/14 Thu 1553 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 92 24.494 03/07/14 Fri 2041 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 93 12.240 03/08/14 Sat 0900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 94 1 10.177 03/08/14 1 Sat 1817 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 95 9.981 03/09/14 Sun 1015 Other Fixed Object 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 96 26.684 03/10/14 Mon 1125 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 97 30.710 03/10/14 Mon 2230 Work Zone/Maintenance Equip. 0 0 1 Night Dry I No Contributing Action 98 10.346 03/10/14 Mon 1654 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 99 21.475 03/11/14 Tue 0744 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 100 5.212 03/12/14 Wed 2210 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 101 17.317 03/12/14 Wed 2112 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 102 15.450 03/13/14 Thu 1052 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 103 27.355 03/14/14 Fri 1025 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 104 27.614 03/14/14 Fri 1730 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 105 12.452 03/16/14 Sun 0050 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 106 33.048 03/16/14 Sun 1251 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 107 37.775 03/16/14 Sun 1320 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 108 28.492 03/18/14 Tue 1320 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 109 14.945 03/19/14 Wed 1416 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 16.710 03/20/14 Thu 2042 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 111 18.275 03/20/14 Thu 1320 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 18.899 03/21/14 Fri 2025 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 113 11.852 03/21/14 Fri 1426 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 9.236 03/21/14 Fri 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 115 27.599 03/21/14 Fri 0810 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 116 27.888 03/21/14 Fri 1100 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 117 22.698 03/22/14 Sat 1135 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 118 3.537 03/22/14 Sat 1050 Angle 0 4 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 119 5.217 03/23/14 Sun 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 120 22.484 03/23/14 Sun 1634 Guardrail Face 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 121 18.136 03/23/14 Sun 1916 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 24.661 03/23/14 Sun 1803 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 123 25.913 03/24/14 Mon 1242 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 124 32.249 03/24/14 Mon 1120 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 125 27.510 03/24/14 Mon 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 126 2.002 03/25/14 Tue 0320 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 1 Night Wet Not Coded 127 12.391 03/2S/14 Tue 1653 Head-On 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 30.113 03/25/14 Tue 1130 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 129 9.729 03/2S/14 Tue 1335 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 130 16.336 03/26/14 Wed 1544 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 131 18.101 03/26/14 Wed 0820 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 132 17.695 03/26/14 Wed 1328 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 133 16.349 03/28/14 Fri 1420 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 134 18.298 03/29/14 Sat 0620 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 135 22.198 03/29/14 Sat 2030 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 136 9.554 03/29/14 Sat 1655 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 137 28.180 03/31/14 Mon 1145 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 138 16.336 03/31/14 Mon 2006 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 139 24.017 03/31/14 Mon 0940 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 140 26.876 04/01/14 Tue 1050 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 141 27.614 04/01/14 Tue 1125 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 142 18.104 04/02/14 Wed 1618 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 143 21.594 04/02/14 Wed 2211 Work Zone/Maintenance Equip. 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 144 9.657 04/04/14 Fri 0525 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 145 31.268 04/04/14 Fri 1638 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 16.797 04/04/14 Fri 1622 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 147 13.792 04/04/14 Fri 1654 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 148 25.125 04/04/14 Fri 1210 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 149 18.899 04/05/14 Sat 1330 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 150 10.459 04/05/14 Sat 1424 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 151 33.775 04/06/14 Sun 2014 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 152 33.275 04/07/14 Mon 1305 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 1S3 19.246 04/07/14 Mon 2038 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 154 16.702 04/07/14 Mon 1533 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 155 9.436 04/08/14 Tue 2143 Guardrail End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 156 11.771 04/10/14 Thu 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Not Coded 1S7 15.216 04/10/14 Thu 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 158 12.202 04/10/14 Thu 1530 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 1S9 2.706 04/11/14 Fri 1407 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 160 15.201 04/11/14 Fri 0755 Angle 1 0 11 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 161 28.637 04/11/14 Fri 1637 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 162 27.509 04/12/14 Sat 1019 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 163 15.459 04/13/14 Sun 0025 Not Coded 0 4 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 164 15.739 04/13/14 Sun 1235 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 165 26.179 04/14/14 Mon 1140 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 166 28.212 04/14/14 Mon 1559 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 167 16.711 04/15/14 Tue 0845 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 168 25.402 04/17/14 Thu 2025 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 169 24.548 04/18/14 Fri 1749 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 170 25.666 04/19/14 Sat 1301 Angle 0 1 0 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 171 16.138 04/19/14 Sat 2136 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 172 24.361 04/19/14 Sat 1130 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 173 31.285 04/20/14 Sun 1814 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 174 9.757 04/20/14 Sun 0917 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 175 1 16.166 04/23/14 1 Wed 0855 1 Angle 0 1 11 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 176 12.352 04/26/14 Sat 1340 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 177 25.737 04/26/14 Sat 0959 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 178 32.428 04/28/14 Mon 0709 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 179 26.957 04/29/14 Tue 0802 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 180 12.452 05/03/14 Sat 1445 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 181 28.780 05/04/14 Sun 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 182 17.657 OS/04/14 Sun 1110 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 183 36.775 05/04/14 Sun 1225 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 184 12.259 05/04/14 Sun 0135 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 185 32.516 05/04/14 Sun 1536 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 186 23.867 05/05/14 Mon 1650 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 187 18.218 05/05/14 Mon 1317 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 188 26.024 05/06/14 Tue 1315 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 189 16.418 05/06/14 Tue 0328 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 190 10.794 05/07/14 Wed 1335 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 191 17.024 05/09/14 Fri 1425 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 192 18.436 05/09/14 Fri 1223 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 193 34.775 05/10/14 Sat 1145 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 194 8.124 05/11/14 Sun 1205 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 195 10.177 05/11/14 Sun 1520 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 196 12.900 05/11/14 Sun 1836 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 197 21.025 05/12/14 Mon 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 198 16.323 05/12/14 Man 1653 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 199 25.726 05/13/14 Tue 1110 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 200 9.729 05/14/14 Wed 1134 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 201 18.487 05/14/14 Wed 0045 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 202 31.301 05/14/14 Wed 1825 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 203 25.628 05/16/14 Fri 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 204 8.123 OS/17/14 Sat 1310 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 205 28.244 05/19/14 Mon 1013 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 206 25.970 OS/19/14 Mon 1528 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 207 30.937 05/20/14 Tue 0954 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 208 25.723 OS/21/14 Wed 2124 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 209 31.532 05/22/14 Thu 0955 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Other Contributing Action 210 4.667 OS/22/14 Thu 10SO Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 211 24.592 05/22/14 Thu 1910 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 212 29.443 OS/23/14 Fri 0920 0.000 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 213 27.506 05/23/14 Fri 1455 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 214 30.248 05/23/14 Fri 1630 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 215 26.722 05/23/14 Fri 1735 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 216 9.941 05/23/14 Fri 2150 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 217 15.200 05/24/14 Sat 1025 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 218 15.244 05/24/14 Sat 1205 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 219 15.682 05/24/14 Sat 0447 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 220 19.226 05/25/14 Sun 2300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Other Not Coded 221 7.074 05/28/14 Wed 1346 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 222 25.747 05/31/14 Sat 1220 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 223 9.720 06/01/14 Sun 1120 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 224 15.493 06/05/14 Thu 2033 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 225 7.074 06/07/14 Sat 1010 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 226 3.471 06/08/14 Sun 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 227 8.729 06/08/14 Sun 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 228 9.729 06/09/14 Mon 0845 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 229 27.614 06/09/14 Mon 1050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 230 10.743 06/09/14 Mon 0233 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 231 29.325 06/10/14 Tue 1255 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 232 26.318 06/11/14 Wed 1624 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 233 18.294 06/11/14 Wed 0835 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 234 15.787 06/13/14 Fri 1230 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 235 10.177 06/14/14 Sat 1940 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 236 8.229 06/1S/14 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 237 18.436 06/17/14 Tue 2241 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 238 26.364 06/18/14 Wed 1155 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 239 18.298 06/19/14 Thu 1938 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 240 13.872 06/19/14 Thu 0955 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 241 17.700 06/19/14 Thu 1222 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day 1 Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 242 2.731 06/20/14 Fri 1501 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 243 9.629 06/20/14 Fri 1215 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 244 10.282 06/20/14 Fri 1305 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 245 37.775 06/21/14 Sat 0718 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 246 11.107 06/21/14 Sat 0539 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 247 28.822 06/22/14 Sun 1005 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 248 6.308 06/23/14 Mon 1244 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 249 10.592 06/23/14 Man 1826 Guardrail Face 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 250 18.890 06/23/14 Mon 1310 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 251 18.899 06/26/14 Thu 1515 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 252 25.932 06/27/14 Fri 0850 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 253 12.164 06/28/14 Sat 1100 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 254 15.769 06/28/14 Sat 0042 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 255 7.631 06/28/14 Sat 1748 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 256 1 9.215 06/29/14 1 Sun 0740 1 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 2S7 32.275 06/29/14 Sun 1355 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 258 30.758 06/29/14 Sun 1453 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 259 0.613 06/30/14 Mon 1130 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 260 36.734 06/30/14 Mon 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 261 24.161 06/30/14 Mon 1610 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 262 27.495 07/01/14 Tue 1125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 263 23.989 07/O1/14 Tue 1515 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 264 31.720 07/02/14 Wed 1415 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 265 10.177 07/03/14 Thu 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 266 9.729 07/03/14 Thu 1600 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 267 29.717 07/03/14 Thu 1810 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day I Dry Not Coded 268 10.365 07/04/14 Fri 1524 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 269 31.598 07/05/14 Sat 1200 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 270 14.177 07/05/14 Sat 1650 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 271 1 5.712 07/06/14 1 Sun 1704 1 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 272 0.061 07/06/14 Sun 1315 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 273 24.477 07/07/14 Mon 0855 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 274 21.808 07/11/14 Fri 1235 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 275 26.631 07/11/14 Fri 0820 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 276 11.107 07/12/14 Sat 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 277 36.775 07/12/14 Sat 1626 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 278 27.409 07/13/14 Sun 0320 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 279 9.065 07/13/14 Sun 1807 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 280 27.888 07/15/14 Tue 1500 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 281 30.217 07/16/14 Wed 1620 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 282 30.242 07/17/14 Thu 1010 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 283 10.054 07/18/14 Fri 2121 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 284 7.995 07/18/14 Fri 1620 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 285 18.899 07/18/14 Fri 1950 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 286 2.490 07/20/14 Sun 0330 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Other No Contributing Action 287 9.813 07/20/14 Sun 1758 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 288 28.824 07/20/14 Sun 1820 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 289 27.485 07/21/14 Mon 1350 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 290 24.592 07/21/14 Mon 1105 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 291 8.625 07/21/14 Mon 2126 Head-On 0 3 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 292 18.417 07/22/14 Tue 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 293 1.502 07/23/14 Wed 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 294 16.936 07/23/14 Wed 0000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 295 32.465 07/23/14 Wed 1110 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 296 25.932 07/24/14 Thu 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 297 20.713 07/25/14 Fri 0541 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 1 0 Nigh Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 298 23.895 07/25/14 Fri 0755 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 299 24.427 07/26/14 Sat 1128 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 300 5.814 07/26/14 Sat 1030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 301 11.054 07/27/14 Sun 1300 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 302 37.734 07/27/14 Sun 1435 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 303 27.604 07/28/14 Mon 1310 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 304 23.886 07/28/14 Mon 0815 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 305 18.899 07/29/14 Tue 1310 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 306 25.539 07/29/14 Tue 2046 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Not Coded 307 25.558 07/30/14 Wed 1638 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 308 26.318 08/01/14 Fri 1300 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 309 0.660 08/01/14 Fri 1638 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 310 14.687 08/01/14 Fri 1200 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 311 33.140 08/02/14 Sat 0724 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 312 24.767 08/02/14 Sat 1159 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 313 8.759 08/02/14 Sat 1610 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 314 24.443 08/02/14 Sat 1940 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 315 16.607 08/03/14 Sun 0705 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Wet I Other Contributing Action 316 14.168 08/03/14 Sun 1406 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 317 13.944 08/03/14 Sun 1410 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 318 23.989 08/04/14 Mon 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 319 14.737 08/OS/14 Tue 1635 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 320 8.553 08/05/14 Tue 1 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 321 0.852 08/OS/14 Tue 1855 0.000 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 322 13.616 08/OS/14 Tue 1651 Rear-End 0 7 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 323 18.290 08/06/14 Wed 0900 Curb 0 0 1 Day WetI Careless or Negligent Manner 324 6.247 08/06/14 Wed 1 1120 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 325 25.666 08/09/14 Sat 0930 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 326 32.722 08/10/14 Sun 1423 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 327 2.694 08/10/14 Sun 1305 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 328 31.717 08/10/14 Sun 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 329 10.749 08/10/14 Sun 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 330 11.702 08/11/14 Man 0955 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 331 2.706 08/11/14 Mon 1457 Angle 0 7 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 332 25.399 08/13/14 Wed 0750 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 333 32.675 08/13/14 Wed 1330 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 334 33.775 08/14/14 Thu 1614 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 335 16.702 08/15/14 Fri 0807 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 336 16.702 08/15/14 Fri 1320 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 337 1 27.498 08/15/14 1 Fri 1521 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 338 27.364 08/16/14 Sat 1537 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 339 26.000 08/17/14 Sun 1255 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 340 18.908 08/20/14 Wed 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 341 8.118 08/20/14 Wed 2150 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 342 29.013 08/22/14 Fri 0835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 343 19.295 08/22/14 Fri 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 344 19.295 08/22/14 Fri 1920 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 345 25.932 08/23/14 Sat 0432 Sideswipe 0 1 2 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 346 14.542 08/23/14 Sat 1523 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dr Other Contributing Action 347 21.225 08/24/14 Sun 1607 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 348 14.116 08/24/14 Sun 1050 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 349 3.379 08/24/14 Sun 1800 Sideswipe 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 350 26.684 08/26/14 Tue 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 351 16.704 08/26/14 Tue 0750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 352 1 16.759 08/28/14 1 Thu 0011 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 353 16.336 08/29/14 Fri 1339 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 354 25.246 08/29/14 Fri 1040 Backed Into 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 355 18.363 08/29/14 Fri 1710 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Other Contributing Action 356 18.908 08/30/14 Sat 1045 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 357 12.069 08/30/14 Sat 1627 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 358 10.440 08/31/14 Sun 2054 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 359 14.244 09/01/14 Mon 2030 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Not Coded 360 15.307 09/02/14 Tue 1613 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 361 31.875 09/02/14 Tue 0908 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 362 18.835 09/02/14 Tue 1709 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 363 33.775 09/06/14 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 364 27.466 09/07/14 Sun 1849 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 365 32.349 09/08/14 Mon 1844 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 366 14.130 09/10/14 Wed 1222 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 367 14.718 09/12/14 Fri 1445 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 368 4.201 09/13/14 Sat 0528 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 369 16.336 09/13/14 Sat 0910 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 370 10.554 09/16/14 Tue 1245 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 371 17.697 09/16/14 Tue 1000 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 372 29.012 09/18/14 Thu 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 373 21.722 09/20/14 Sat 0222 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 374 29.075 09/23/14 Tue 1140 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 375 5.212 09/24/14 Wed 1542 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 376 18.273 09/26/14 Fri 2250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 377 23.645 09/26/14 Fri 1518 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 378 24.543 09/27/14 Sat 0900 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 379 25.970 09/27/14 Sat 1203 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 380 17.686 09/27/14 Sat 1425 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 381 25.725 09/27/14 Sat 1758 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 382 9.294 09/28/14 Sun 1053 Immersion 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 383 12.221 09/28/14 Sun 1240 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 384 6.924 09/29/14 Mon 0920 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 385 25.528 10/01/14 Wed 0810 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 386 16.706 10/03/14 Fri 1205 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 387 21.518 10/05/14 Sun 1155 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 388 21.308 10/06/14 Mon 1105 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 389 17.676 10/06/14 Mon 1742 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 390 27.610 10/06/14 Mon 1023 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 391 15.234 10/06/14 Mon 1451 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 392 33.275 10/08/14 Wed 1344 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 393 23.478 10/09/14 Thu 1919 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 394 26.305 10/10/14 Fri 0815 Pedalcycle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 395 21.116 10/11/14 Sat 1535 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 396 21.458 10/12/14 Sun 1345 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 397 17.695 10/12/14 Sun 1315 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 398 18.899 10/12/14 Sun 0620 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 399 18.899 10/12/14 Sun 0620 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Wet Other Contributing Action 400 32.008 10/13/14 Mon 1320 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 401 25.685 10/13/14 Mon 1739 Rear-End 0 4 1 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 402 25.727 10/15/14 Wed 1928 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 403 3.776 10/16/14 Thu 1305 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 404 10.702 10/17/14 Fri 1806 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 405 12.904 10/17/14 Fri 1815 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 406 24.293 10/18/14 Sat 1040 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 407 16.704 10/20/14 Mon 1025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 408 13.629 10/22/14 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 409 18.275 10/23/14 Thu 1535 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 410 20.845 10/24/14 Fri 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Improper Turn 411 15.966 10/25/14 Sat 1110 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 412 37.775 10/26/14 Sun 1325 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 413 12.107 10/26/14 Sun 1730 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry 1 Disregarded other Road Markings 414 28.180 10/27/14 Mon 1435 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 415 28.646 10/27/14 Mon 1326 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 416 8.229 10/27/14 Mon 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 417 8.229 10/27/14 Mon 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 418 1 28.530 10/27/14 1 Mon 1148 1 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 419 17.733 10/27/14 Mon 1723 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 420 25.727 10/28/14 Tue 1050 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 421 18.794 10/29/14 Wed 1724 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 422 9.729 10/30/14 Thu 0842 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 423 28.985 10/30/14 Thu 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 424 28.543 10/31/14 Fri 1310 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 42S 36.775 10/31/14 Fri 0740 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 426 25.418 10/31/14 Fri 1840 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 427 6.247 11/02/14 Sun 0135 Animal 0 1 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 428 16.324 11/03/14 Mon 0735 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 429 10.365 11/03/14 Mon 1501 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 430 14.983 11/05/14 Wed 1245 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 431 22.228 11/05/14 Wed 0058 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 432 29.180 11/06/14 Thu 0532 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 433 15.179 11/06/14 Thu 1509 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 434 28.492 11/06/14 Thu 1657 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 435 18.826 11/07/14 Fri 1029 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 436 14.790 11/07/14 Fri 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 437 12.452 11/07/14 Fri 1714 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 438 15.593 11/09/14 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 439 14.654 11/09/14 Sun 1920 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 440 17.536 11/10/14 Mon 1115 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 441 16.511 11/10/14 Man 1810 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 442 23.886 11/10/14 Mon 1950 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 443 26.100 11/12/14 Wed 1537 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 444 21.598 11/13/14 Thu 0820 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 445 21.598 11/14/14 Fri 1030 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 446 33.775 11/15/14 Sat 1250 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 447 27.504 11/17/14 Mon 0625 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Wet Followed too Closely 448 29.114 11/17/14 Mon 1626 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 449 27.633 11/17/14 Mon 1655 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 450 25.967 11/17/14 Mon 1335 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 451 9.310 11/18/14 Tue 1330 Sideswipe 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry Other Contributing Action 452 5.534 11/20/14 Thu 1045 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4S3 10.459 11/23/14 Sun 1555 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 454 9.729 11/24/14 Mon 0840 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4SS 12.052 11/24/14 Mon 1715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 456 29.316 11/24/14 Mon 0032 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 457 26.005 11/25/14 Tue 1336 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 458 16.147 11/30/14 Sun 1010 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 459 12.452 11/30/14 Sun 1105 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 460 8.282 12/O1/14 Mon 0925 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 461 17.758 12/01/14 Mon 1449 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 462 11.525 12/03/14 Wed 1446 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 463 29.872 12/03/14 Wed 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 464 19.226 12/04/14 Thu 2025 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 465 15.429 12/05/14 Fri 1810 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 466 7.905 12/06/14 Sat 1800 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 467 38.634 12/07/14 Sun 1330 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 468 8.664 12/08/14 Mon 1600 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 469 12.297 12/08/14 Mon 1519 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 470 18.899 12/08/14 Mon 2127 Backedlnto 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 471 29.613 12/09/14 Tue 1905 Pedestrian 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 472 29.325 12/09/14 Tue 1225 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 473 17.506 12/09/14 Tue 1510 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 474 23.886 12/11/14 Thu 1700 Angle 0 2 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 475 28.637 12/12/14 Fri 1847 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 476 16.702 12/13/14 Sat 1814 Backed Into 0 0 1 Night I Dry Not Coded 477 10.702 12/14/14 Sun 1636 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 478 34.455 12/15/14 Mon 2310 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 479 30.104 12/16/14 Tue 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 480 33.275 12/17/14 Wed 0757 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 481 16.336 12/18/14 Thu 1935 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Other Other Contributing Action 482 10.649 12/18/14 Thu 1358 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 483 25.514 12/18/14 Thu 1819 Sideswipe 1 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 484 27.513 12/19/14 Fri 1655 Rear-End 1 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48S 27.336 12/19/14 Fri 1750 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 486 16.416 12/19/14 Fri 1240 Rear-End 1 0 1 1 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 487 18.899 12/20/14 Sat 1356 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 488 31.441 12/20/14 Sat 0205 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 489 29.425 12/20/14 Sat 1925 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 490 25.913 12/21/14 Sun 2110 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 491 27.509 12/22/14 Mon 0944 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 492 27.507 12/22/14 Mon 1510 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 493 7.729 12/22/14 Mon 1120 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 494 15.012 12/23/14 Tue 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 495 25.709 12/25/14 Thu 0620 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 496 18.899 12/27/14 Sat 0725 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 497 10.554 12/27/14 Sat 1936 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 498 33.775 12/28/14 Sun 1035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 499 14.983 12/28/14 Sun 1455 Rear-End 0 2 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner S00 27.580 12/28/14 Sun 1935 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 501 26.155 12/29/14 Mon 2107 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 502 13.264 12/29/14 Mon 0645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 503 17.691 12/29/14 Mon 1300 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 504 24.086 12/30/14 Tue 1950 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 505 12.801 12/30/14 Tue 1331 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 506 31.498 12/31/14 Wed 1853 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 507 7.074 12/31/14 Wed 1005 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 507 3 204 300 227 2 90 10 6 42 4 23 7 44 0 22 Percent 0.59% 40.24% 59.17% 44.77% 0.39% 17.75% 1.97% 1.18% 8.28% 0.79% 4.54% 1.38% 8.68% 0.00% 4.34% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 387 120 43 461 237 91 17 0 2 6 1 4 1 36 2 Percent 76.33% 23.67% 8.48% 90.93% 46.75% 17.95% 3.35% 0.00% 0.39% 1.18% 0.20% 0.79% 0.20% 7.10% 0.39% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,613 SPOT CRASH RATE: 58.825 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 13.089 01/02/15 Fri 1215 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 2 16.157 01/02/15 Fri 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 15.493 01/02/15 Fri 1225 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 4 28.180 01/02/15 Fri 1555 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 5 18.894 01/03/15 Sat 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 6 15.031 01/03/15 Sat 1520 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 22.198 01/03/15 Sat 2300 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 0 1 Unknown Other Careless or Negligent Manner 8 24.187 01/04/15 Sun 1910 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 9 20.771 01/04/15 Sun 0720 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 10.202 01/04/15 Sun 1800 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 33.775 01/05/15 Mon 1400 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 16.468 01/06/15 Tue 1110 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 20.797 01/09/15 Fri 0825 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 28.534 01/09/15 Fri 2009 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 21.687 01/10/15 Sat 2032 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 9.554 01/10/15 Sat 2102 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 17 26.782 01/11/15 Sun 1058 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 0.171 01/12/15 Mon 2303 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 19 37.234 01/12/15 Mon 2137 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 20 27.355 01/13/15 Tue 1650 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 21 7.236 01/14/15 Wed 1455 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 12.995 01/15/15 Thu 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 18.718 01/16/15 Fri 0500 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 24 25.728 01/16/15 Fri 1338 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 25 12.050 01/16/15 Fri 1828 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 26 2.214 01/17/15 Sat 1059 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 12.145 01/18/15 Sun 1906 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 8.241 01/19/15 Mon 1634 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 29 29.104 01/20/15 Tue 2023 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 29.013 01/21/15 Wed 1715 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 21.225 01/22/15 Thu 2300 Ditch 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 9.952 01/22/15 Thu 1512 Head-On 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 27.509 01/23/15 Fri 1250 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 34 33.275 01/24/15 Sat 1325 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 24.102 01/24/15 Sat 2000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Unknown Dry Not Coded 36 25.663 01/25/15 Sun 1015 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 37 31.720 01/25/15 Sun 1347 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 25.804 01/26/15 Mon 1620 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 14.206 01/27/15 Tue 1507 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 17.595 01/28/15 Wed 0930 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 12.032 01/28/15 Wed 1534 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 0.220 01/29/15 Thu 0917 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 27.352 01/29/15 Thu 1615 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 27.504 01/30/15 Fri 1335 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 45 12.957 01/30/15 Fri 1609 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 28.332 01/30/15 Fri 2107 Angle 0 4 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 47 28.530 01/31/15 Sat 1951 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 48 18.899 02/02/15 Mon 1926 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 27.239 02/03/15 Tue 1144 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 50 25.399 02/04/15 Wed 1300 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 51 30.386 02/06/15 Fri 0819 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 18.275 02/07/15 Sat 1604 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 24.248 02/07/15 Sat 1150 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 7.991 02/08/15 Sun 1615 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 12.202 02/09/15 Mon 1237 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 56 26.014 02/09/15 Mon 1225 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 25.399 02/10/15 Tue 1543 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 58 18.908 02/10/15 Tue 1350 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 59 36.734 02/11/15 Wed 0749 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 60 27.163 02/12/15 Thu 1445 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 61 12.802 02/14/15 Sat 1625 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 62 17.695 02/14/15 Sat 1405 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 63 32.522 02/14/15 Sat 1643 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 64 23.895 02/15/15 Sun 1452 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 65 16.952 02/15/15 Sun 2332 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 16.368 02/15/15 Sun 1000 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 67 29.306 02/16/15 Mon 1440 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 68 20.953 02/16/15 Mon 1731 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 21.528 02/16/15 Mon 0915 Tree(Standing) 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 70 13.949 02/16/15 Mon 1344 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 71 25.761 02/16/15 Mon 0305 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 72 6.285 02/16/15 Mon 1304 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 73 25.986 02/17/15 Tue 1555 Curb 0 4 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 74 27.254 02/18/15 Wed 1646 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 75 27.593 02/18/15 Wed 1044 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 76 34.617 02/19/15 Thu 0830 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 77 25.151 02/19/15 Thu 1112 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 78 8.004 02/19/15 Thu 1033 Backedlnto 0 0 1 Day Dry Im proper Backing 79 16.336 02/20/15 Fri 1444 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 33.343 02/21/15 Sat 1330 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 81 27.485 02/21/15 Sat 0920 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 8.457 02/21/15 Sat 1050 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 83 14.716 02/21/15 Sat 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 11.107 02/21/15 Sat 1810 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 28.618 02/22/15 Sun 1555 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 28.599 02/23/15 Mon 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 16.397 02/24/15 Tue 1547 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 88 9.748 02/24/15 Tue 1025 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 19.399 02/26/15 Thu 2135 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 90 23.508 02/26/15 Thu 0606 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 91 25.731 02/26/15 1 Thu 1010 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 92 27.376 02/26/15 Thu 1217 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 93 8.329 02/27/15 Fri 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 94 29.573 02/27/15 Fri 1030 Work Zone/Maintenance Equip. 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 95 9.236 02/28/15 Sat 1554 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 12.214 02/28/15 Sat 1600 Rear-End 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 97 31.273 02/28/15 Sat 0115 Head-On 2 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 98 9.056 03/O1/15 Sun 1103 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 99 14.049 03/01/15 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 100 17.695 03/02/15 Mon 1534 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 101 26.201 03/02/15 Mon 1233 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 16.702 03/03/15 Tue 1000 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 103 11.702 03/03/15 Tue 1401 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 104 3.194 03/03/15 Tue 1747 Fence 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 105 17.600 03/03/15 Tue 2036 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 106 24.252 03/04/15 Wed 0530 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 107 10.554 03/05/15 Thu 1439 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 108 18.539 03/05/15 Thu 2231 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 5.314 03/06/15 Fri 0824 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 6.247 03/06/15 Fri 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 111 22.571 03/07/15 Sat 1900 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 112 20.330 03/07/15 Sat 1504 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 113 26.820 03/07/15 Sat 1250 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 114 13.200 03/07/15 Sat 1515 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 115 18.436 03/07/15 Sat 1825 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 116 11.107 03/08/15 Sun 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 117 17.695 03/08/15 Sun 1952 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 118 28.769 03/08/15 Sun 1006 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 119 15.666 03/08/15 Sun 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 120 25.904 03/08/15 Sun 1535 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 121 16.336 03/09/15 Mon 1418 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 12.174 03/09/15 Mon 1015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 17.977 03/10/15 Tue 1600 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 124 29.114 03/11/15 Wed 1316 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 125 20.235 03/11/15 Wed 1804 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 126 7.236 03/12/15 Thu 1739 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 127 29.459 03/12/15 Thu 1209 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 128 18.899 03/13/15 Fri 1345 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 129 12.524 03/13/15 Fri 0735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 12.452 03/13/15 Fri 1333 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 131 9.738 03/13/15 Fri 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 132 12.211 03/14/15 Sat 1327 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 133 28.824 03/15/15 Sun 1905 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 134 17.696 03/15/15 Sun 0153 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 135 29.513 03/15/15 Sun 2045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 136 14.338 03/16/15 Mon 1455 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 137 19.933 03/17/15 Tue 1335 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 138 9.594 03/17/15 Tue 1715 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 139 0.234 03/19/15 Thu 1251 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 140 17.733 03/19/15 Thu 1035 Curb 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 141 18.899 03/20/15 Fri 1550 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 142 21.498 03/20/15 Fri 0905 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 143 16.938 03/20/15 Fri 1535 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 144 7.975 03/20/15 Fri 1810 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 145 9.691 03/22/15 Sun 2110 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 27.355 03/23/15 Mon 1226 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 147 26.810 03/23/15 Mon 1640 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 148 15.464 03/24/15 Tue 1305 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 149 16.202 03/25/15 Wed 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 150 8.241 03/26/15 Thu 2202 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 151 8.548 03/26/15 Thu 2030 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 152 9.236 03/26/15 Thu 0858 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 153 25.728 03/27/15 Fri 1639 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 154 15.225 03/27/15 Fri 1919 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 155 28.054 03/28/15 Sat 1000 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 156 7.236 03/28/15 Sat 1439 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 157 19."6 03/28/15 Sat 1838 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 158 19.426 03/29/15 Sun 0550 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 159 12.800 03/29/15 Sun 1140 Rear-End 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 160 6.247 03/29/15 Sun 1651 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 161 32.511 03/30/15 Mon 0809 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 162 30.397 04/01/15 Wed 1525 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 163 17.695 04/01/15 Wed 2035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 164 0.023 04/01/15 Wed 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 165 17.709 04/01/15 Wed 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 166 26.103 04/01/15 Wed 1423 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 167 8.320 04/02/15 Thu 1743 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 168 17.977 04/02/15 Thu 1100 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 169 9.829 04/03/15 Fri 1030 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 170 23.182 04/03/15 1 Fri 1435 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 171 18.375 04/03/15 Fri 1645 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 172 15.993 04/04/15 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 173 9.236 04/05/15 Sun 1356 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 174 29.104 04/05/15 Sun 2106 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 175 27.155 04/06/15 Mon 1700 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 176 25.986 04/07/15 Tue 0807 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 177 10.459 04/07/15 Tue 0405 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 178 12.287 04/07/15 Tue 2145 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 179 6.247 04/08/15 Wed 2129 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 180 11.416 04/09/15 Thu 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 181 18.785 04/10/15 Fri 1138 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 182 7.948 04/10/15 Fri 1521 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 183 17.445 04/11/15 Sat 0911 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 184 5.229 04/11/15 Sat 1812 Ran into Water/Canal 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 185 17.317 04/12/15 Sun 1804 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 186 32.470 04/12/15 Sun 1425 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 187 8.783 04/14/15 Tue 2347 Left-Turn 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 188 18.835 04/14/15 Tue 1525 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 189 8.023 04/18/15 Sat 0442 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 190 34.775 04/19/15 Sun 1145 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 191 6.247 04/19/15 Sun 1348 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 192 1.706 04/21/15 Tue 2202 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 193 17.695 04/21/15 Tue 1000 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 194 18.877 04/21/15 Tue 1505 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 195 27.485 04/23/15 Thu 1240 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 196 26.068 04/24/15 Fri 1150 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 197 32.749 04/24/15 Fri 2220 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Improper Turn 198 26.684 04/26/15 Sun 2057 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 199 27.457 04/27/15 Mon 1230 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 200 20.953 04/27/15 Mon 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 201 12.402 04/28/15 Tue 0910 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 202 9.236 04/28/15 Tue 2034 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 203 4.186 04/29/15 Wed 0952 Sideswipe 0 2 1 0 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 204 9.760 04/29/15 Wed 0003 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 205 16.473 04/30/15 Thu 0731 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 206 25.875 04/30/15 Thu 0805 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 207 27.409 05/01/15 Fri 1640 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 208 31.031 05/01/15 Fri 1725 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 209 21.832 05/01/15 Fri 0855 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 210 13.200 05/01/15 Fri 1610 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 211 37.775 05/02/15 Sat 1405 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 212 14.790 05/03/15 Sun 1305 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 213 8.576 05/03/15 Sun 1730 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 214 21.732 05/03/15 Sun 2020 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 215 27.025 05/04/15 Mon 2025 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 216 6.014 05/04/15 Mon 1340 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 217 33.775 05/06/15 Wed 1050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 218 22.333 05/06/15 Wed 1807 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 219 18.336 05/08/15 Fri 1046 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 220 1.216 05/08/15 Fri 2305 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 221 37.734 05/09/15 Sat 1235 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 222 11.616 05/10/15 Sun 2050 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 223 9.479 05/10/15 Sun 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 224 22.198 05/10/15 Sun 1525 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 225 28.609 05/10/15 Sun 1805 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 226 20.914 05/11/15 Mon 1745 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 227 17.695 05/13/15 Wed 0856 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 228 25.828 05/14/15 Thu 0900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 229 23.914 05/15/15 Fri 0718 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 230 32.641 05/15/15 Fri 2125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 231 17.863 05/15/15 Fri 1445 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 232 18.899 05/16/15 Sat 1645 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 233 16.522 05/17/15 Sun 2145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 234 7.910 05/17/15 Sun 2105 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 235 2.312 OS/18/15 Mon 0701 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 236 26.405 05/18/15 Mon 1535 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 237 2.206 05/18/15 Mon 2005 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 238 3.594 05/18/15 Mon 2050 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 239 17.695 05/18/15 Mon 1135 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 240 32.446 05/19/15 Tue 1200 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 241 14.130 05/20/15 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 242 25.970 05/20/15 Wed 1830 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 243 18.237 05/21/15 Thu 1620 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 244 29.459 05/21/15 Thu 1220 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 245 22.198 05/21/15 Thu 1425 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 246 16.708 05/22/15 Fri 0423 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 247 27.457 05/22/15 Fri 0745 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 248 16.919 05/22/15 Fri 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 249 28.530 05/23/15 1 Sat 1040 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 250 19.226 05/24/15 Sun 1824 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 251 13.300 05/24/15 Sun 1833 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 252 4.019 05/24/15 Sun 0830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 253 12.002 05/24/15 Sun 1820 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 254 24.649 05/25/15 Mon 1420 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 255 7.794 05/25/15 Mon 1835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 256 4.219 05/25/15 Mon 2000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 257 1.216 05/25/15 Mon 1617 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 258 2.713 05/25/15 Mon 1358 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 259 7.236 05/26/15 Tue 1215 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 260 20.235 05/27/15 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 261 14.769 05/27/15 Wed 1830 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 262 27.504 05/27/15 Wed 1630 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 263 27.466 05/28/15 Thu 1815 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 264 29.325 05/29/15 Fri 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 265 25.813 05/31/15 Sun 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 266 29.355 06/02/15 Tue 2119 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Improper Turn 267 7.236 06/03/15 Wed 1800 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 268 32.522 06/04/15 Thu 1300 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 269 0.500 06/05/15 Fri 0815 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 270 26.517 06/06/15 Sat 1524 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 271 7.236 06/07/15 Sun 1348 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 272 20.714 06/08/15 Mon 1337 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 273 26.299 06/08/15 Mon 0935 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 274 11.702 06/09/15 Tue 0720 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 275 30.935 06/10/15 Wed 1615 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 276 23.848 06/11/15 Thu 1535 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 277 33.522 06/11/15 Thu 1044 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 278 32.522 06/12/15 Fri 1423 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 279 10.563 06/12/15 Fri 1110 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 280 30.242 06/15/15 Mon 1726 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 281 27.504 06/16/15 Tue 1205 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 282 26.703 06/17/15 Wed 1309 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 283 17.945 06/18/15 Thu 1319 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 284 25.766 06/18/15 Thu 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 285 25.728 06/18/15 Thu 1943 Other Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 286 35.775 06/19/15 Fri 1350 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 287 16.664 06/19/15 Fri 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 288 9.687 06/19/15 Fri 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 289 14.790 06/20/15 Sat 1405 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 290 26.194 06/20/15 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 291 8.132 06/21/15 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 292 9.644 06/21/15 Sun 1743 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 293 24.498 06/21/15 Sun 2301 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 294 8.457 06/21/15 Sun 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 295 25.091 06/22/15 Mon 1555 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 296 17.695 06/22/15 Mon 0550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 297 15.206 06/23/15 Tue 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 298 31.121 06/23/15 Tue 2339 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 299 20.297 06/24/15 Wed 1840 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 300 10.478 06/25/15 Thu 1310 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 301 37.717 06/26/15 Fri 1415 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 302 17.317 06/27/15 Sat 1145 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 303 10.706 06/27/15 Sat 1255 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 304 27.897 06/28/15 Sun 1125 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 305 6.768 06/28/15 Sun 1305 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 306 8.065 06/28/15 Sun 1720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 307 5.212 06/30/15 Tue 1359 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 308 20.814 07/02/15 Thu 1005 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 309 23.978 07/02/15 Thu 1714 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 310 36.234 07/03/15 Fri 1032 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 311 29.325 07/03/15 Fri 1141 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 312 15.493 07/03/15 Fri 1630 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 313 7.929 07/04/15 Sat 0752 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 314 28.917 07/04/15 Sat 1217 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 315 27.504 07/04/15 Sat 2030 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 316 16.147 07/04/15 Sat 1455 Rear-End 0 5 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 317 15.450 07/04/15 Sat 1832 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 318 27.504 07/05/15 Sun 0352 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 319 10.545 07/05/15 Sun 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 320 18.207 07/05/15 Sun 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 321 5.256 07/05/15 Sun 2000 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 322 27.504 07/06/15 Mon 0637 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Ran Red Light 323 32.567 07/06/15 Mon 1110 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 324 11.271 07/07/15 Tue 1310 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 325 26.847 07/08/15 Wed 2324 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 326 25.922 07/08/15 Wed 1355 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 327 9.046 07/09/15 Thu 0107 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 328 9.037 07/09/15 1 Thu 1810 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 329 12.052 07/10/15 Fri 2335 Guardrail End 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 330 10.177 07/11/15 Sat 1715 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 331 14.168 07/11/15 Sat 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 332 9.794 07/11/15 Sat 1338 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 333 17.506 07/11/15 Sat 1635 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 334 17.790 07/12/15 Sun 2300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 335 4.094 07/12/15 Sun 1439 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 336 8.166 07/12/15 Sun 1318 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 337 26.523 07/13/15 Mon 0900 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 338 17.860 07/13/15 Mon 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 339 17.695 07/14/15 Tue 2240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 340 30.601 07/16/15 Thu 0425 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 341 32.522 07/16/15 Thu 1655 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 342 9.386 07/18/15 Sat 1220 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 343 9.236 07/18/15 Sat 1615 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 344 10.054 07/18/15 Sat 1345 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 345 24.198 07/19/15 Sun 1100 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 346 13.717 07/19/15 Sun 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 347 24.086 07/20/15 Mon 0945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 348 27.945 07/22/15 Wed 2318 Pedalcycle 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 349 28.774 07/22/15 Wed 0500 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 350 21.453 07/22/15 Wed 1420 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 351 25.685 07/22/15 Wed 0055 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 352 10.404 07/23/15 Thu 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 353 10.906 07/24/15 Fri 2204 Left-Turn 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Not Coded 354 27.204 07/25/15 Sat 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 355 11.666 07/25/15 Sat 1921 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 356 27.493 07/25/15 Sat 1300 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 357 12.224 07/25/15 Sat 1851 Curb 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 358 18.188 07/27/15 Mon 1009 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 359 27.504 07/30/15 Thu 0437 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 360 32.000 07/31/15 Fri 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 361 21.123 07/31/15 Fri 1215 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 362 9.629 07/31/15 Fri 1010 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 363 17.695 07/31/15 Fri 2052 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 364 15.263 08/01/15 Sat 1030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 365 16.071 08/01/15 Sat 1215 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 366 10.177 08/01/15 Sat 1433 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 367 23.182 08/02/15 Sun 0635 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 368 37.734 08/02/15 Sun 0635 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 369 31.598 08/02/15 Sun 1130 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 370 3.950 08/04/15 Tue 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 371 14.880 08/05/15 Wed 1306 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 372 25.932 08/06/15 Thu 1930 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 373 27.517 08/07/15 Fri 2224 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 374 26.929 08/08/15 Sat 1352 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 375 17.317 08/08/15 Sat 1651 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 376 38.412 08/08/15 Sat 1415 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 377 35.775 08/09/15 Sun 0750 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 378 10.177 08/09/15 Sun 1420 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 379 19.381 08/10/15 Mon 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 380 19.149 08/10/15 Mon 0750 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 381 32.522 08/10/15 Mon 0017 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 382 17.695 08/11/15 Tue 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 383 18.436 08/12/15 Wed 1237 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 384 8.218 08/13/15 Thu 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 385 25.922 08/14/15 Fri 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 386 1.216 08/15/15 Sat 1409 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 387 9.490 08/15/15 Sat 1525 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Followed too Closely 388 15.441 08/15/15 Sat 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 389 15.002 08/15/15 Sat 1337 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 390 21.420 08/16/15 Sun 0155 Right-Turn 0 4 0 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 391 20.966 08/16/15 Sun 0645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 392 25.399 08/16/15 Sun 1325 Left-Turn 1 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 323 16.704 08/18/15 Tue 0740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 394 24.198 08/18/15 Tue 1320 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 395 28.755 08/18/15 Tue 2009 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 396 17.638 08/20/15 Thu 1511 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 397 16.213 08/20/15 Thu 1130 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 398 16.868 08/20/15 Thu 1555 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 399 28.530 08/21/15 Fri 1755 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 400 19.338 08/23/15 Sun 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 401 27.860 08/24/15 Mon 1308 0.000 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 402 14.616 08/26/15 Wed 0558 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 403 18.899 08/27/15 Thu 2100 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 404 34.775 08/27/15 Thu 0725 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 405 25.731 08/28/15 Fri 2100 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 406 25.638 08/28/15 Fri 1531 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 407 16.702 08/28/15 1 Fri 1148 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 408 25.737 08/29/15 Sat 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 409 21.725 08/29/15 Sat 1920 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 410 25.913 08/30/15 Sun 1509 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 411 16.323 08/31/15 Mon 0700 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 412 31.284 09/O1/15 Tue 0657 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 413 9.710 09/01/15 Tue 1025 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 414 30.242 09/02/15 Wed 0845 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 415 28.529 09/05/15 Sat 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 416 9.505 09/05/15 Sat 1430 Not Coded 0 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 417 16.253 09/06/15 Sun 1248 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 418 16.071 09/07/15 Mon 1244 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 419 35.775 09/07/15 Mon 1049 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 420 33.775 09/07/15 Mon 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 421 16.702 09/07/15 Mon 1608 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 422 14.483 09/08/15 Tue 0725 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 423 36.522 09/08/15 Tue 0050 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 424 25.796 09/08/15 Tue 1507 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 425 18.952 09/08/15 Tue 1525 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 426 17.600 09/09/15 Wed 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 427 33.775 09/11/15 Fri 1120 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 428 31.852 09/11/15 Fri 1954 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 429 13.146 09/11/15 Fri 2320 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 430 27.509 09/12/15 Sat 0640 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 431 8.996 09/14/15 Mon 1502 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 432 18.183 09/15/15 Tue 1040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 433 15.977 09/16/15 Wed 1458 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 434 18.835 09/18/15 Fri 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 435 8.176 09/18/15 Fri 2011 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 436 18.298 09/20/15 Sun 2029 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 437 16.171 09/23/15 Wed 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 438 27.504 09/23/15 Wed 1447 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 439 18.266 09/27/15 Sun 1420 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 440 7.286 09/27/15 Sun 1830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 441 18.899 09/29/15 Tue 1605 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 442 18.183 09/29/15 Tue 1027 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 443 26.636 09/30/15 Wed 1522 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 444 8.396 09/30/15 Wed 1556 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 445 4.219 09/30/15 Wed 1155 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 446 4.736 10/02/15 Fri 1105 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 447 20.235 10/02/15 Fri 1621 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 448 27.504 10/04/15 Sun 1210 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 449 29.993 10/07/15 Wed 1316 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 450 12.614 10/09/15 Fri 2200 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 451 18.104 10/09/15 Fri 1308 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 452 21.095 10/09/15 Fri 2150 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 453 13.252 10/10/15 Sat 0600 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 454 11.635 10/11/15 Sun 1942 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 455 33.775 10/12/15 Mon 1355 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 456 24.483 10/12/15 Mon 1627 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 457 26.373 10/13/15 Tue 1000 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 458 13.711 10/13/15 Tue 1927 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 459 22.125 10/14/15 Wed 1933 1 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 1 0 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 460 16.364 10/14/15 Wed 1040 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 461 24.475 10/14/15 Wed 1944 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 462 7.236 10/15/15 Thu 1547 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 463 16.919 10/16/15 Fri 1217 Right-Turn 0 1 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 464 17.317 10/16/15 Fri 1824 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 465 17.733 10/16/15 Fri 2013 Pedestrian 0 1 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 466 32.698 10/17/15 Sat 2043 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 467 29.152 10/19/15 Mon 0609 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 468 27.523 10/20/15 Tue 1457 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 469 25.053 10/21/15 Wed 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 470 23.970 10/24/15 Sat 1535 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 471 18.899 10/24/15 Sat 0849 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 472 16.702 10/26/15 Mon 1632 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 473 25.728 10/27/15 Tue 0852 Angle 0 2 0 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 474 1 7.135 10/28/15 Wed 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 475 26.897 10/29/15 Thu 1530 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 476 17.171 10/30/15 Fri 0711 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 477 28.149 11/01/15 Sun 2025 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 478 7.675 11/01/15 Sun 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 479 28.237 11/01/15 Sun 1905 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 480 16.698 11/02/15 Mon 0815 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 481 16.323 11/03/15 Tue 1145 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 482 20.235 11/04/15 Wed 0800 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 483 0.000 11/04/15 Wed 1245 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 484 21.308 11/05/15 Thu 0749 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 485 25.960 11/05/15 Thu 1252 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 486 10.573 11/06/15 1 Fri 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 487 21.429 11/06/15 Fri 1235 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 488 0.594 11/07/15 Sat 0858 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 489 9.064 11/07/15 Sat 2223 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 490 2.264 11/07/15 Sat 0553 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 491 8.601 11/07/15 Sat 1958 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 492 9.079 11/08/15 Sun 1556 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 493 9.365 11/08/15 Sun 1841 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 494 22.571 11/10/15 Tue 1415 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 495 27.504 11/11/15 Wed 1334 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 496 14.399 11/12/15 Thu 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 497 2.497 11/13/15 Fri 1345 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 498 20.235 11/14/15 Sat 0324 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 499 25.776 11/14/15 Sat 1035 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 500 28.319 11/16/15 Mon 1500 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 501 19.099 11/17/15 Tue 1542 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 502 12.202 11/19/15 Thu 2046 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 503 20.197 11/20/15 Fri 1820 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 504 18.156 11/20/15 Fri 1240 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 505 25.828 11/21/15 Sat 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 506 28.793 11/22/15 Sun 1015 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 507 9.236 11/24/15 Tue 2329 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 508 12.786 11/25/15 Wed 1000 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 509 15.450 11/27/15 Fri 0800 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 510 26.024 11/27/15 Fri 1509 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 511 19.310 11/27/15 Fri 1914 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 512 27.490 11/29/15 Sun 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 513 26.849 11/29/15 Sun 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 514 25.756 12/01/15 Tue 0955 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 515 24.136 12/01/15 Tue 1225 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 516 26.527 12/02/15 Wed 2151 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 517 27.714 12/04/15 Fri 1800 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 518 16.683 12/06/15 Sun 1940 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 519 12.724 12/09/15 Wed 1430 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 520 33.707 12/09/15 Wed 1525 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 521 15.269 12/09/15 Wed 2350 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 522 23.192 12/09/15 Wed 1130 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 523 26.043 12/10/15 Thu 1220 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 524 27.502 12/11/15 Fri 0740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 525 25.227 12/11/15 Fri 0800 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 526 14.092 12/11/15 Fri 1035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 527 32.567 12/11/15 Fri 1230 1 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 528 26.989 12/12/15 Sat 1323 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 529 23.389 12/13/15 Sun 2035 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 530 12.202 12/14/15 Mon 1250 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 531 23.182 12/16/15 Wed 2235 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 532 25.690 12/16/15 Wed 0910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 533 15.437 12/16/15 Wed 0221 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 534 15.140 12/18/15 Fri 1155 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 535 21.227 12/18/15 Fri 0809 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 536 25.728 12/18/15 Fri 1042 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 537 20.235 12/19/15 Sat 1835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Unknown Dry Followed too Closely 538 14.227 12/20/15 Sun 0401 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 539 37.734 12/21/15 Mon 0946 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 540 26.318 12/22/15 Tue 1639 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 541 17.317 12/22/15 Tue 1909 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 542 14.227 12/22/15 Tue 2110 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Wet Not Coded 543 15.607 12/22/15 Tue 0648 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 544 10.365 12/23/15 Wed 1757 Pedestrian 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 545 25.478 12/26/15 Sat 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 546 9.729 12/26/15 Sat 1537 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 547 10.459 12/26/15 Sat 1556 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 548 10.933 12/26/15 Sat 2113 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 549 6.247 12/26/15 Sat 1430 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 550 26.005 12/26/15 Sat 1222 Angle 0 0 1 1 1 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 551 15.225 12/26/15 Sat 1725 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Disregarded Other Traffic Sign 552 31.306 12/26/15 Sat 1922 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 553 5.247 12/26/15 Sat 1228 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 554 2.206 12/28/15 Mon 1557 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 555 27.502 12/28/15 Mon 1725 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 556 0.000 12/28/15 Mon 1455 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 557 27.519 12/28/15 Mon 1141 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 558 25.724 12/28/15 Mon 2227 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 559 36.734 12/29/15 Tue 0904 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 560 11.307 12/30/15 Wed 1635 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 561 6.247 12/30/15 Wed 2129 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 562 17.317 12/30/15 Wed 1452 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 563 15.263 12/30/15 Wed 1300 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 564 18.799 12/30/15 Wed 1557 Angle 0 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 565 26.545 12/31/15 Thu 1048 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 566 26.684 12/31/15 1 Thu 1035 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 566 6 186 375 279 2 110 19 7 35 1 23 4 42 1 13 Percent 1.06% 32.85% 56.25% 49.29% 0.35% 19.43% 3.35% 1.24% 6.18% 0.18% 4.06% 0.71% 7.42% 0.18% 2.30% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 428 135 49 516 279 101 16 6 5 3 1 1 3 27 1 Percent 1 75.62% 1 23.85% 1 8.66% 1 91.17% 1 49.29%_L_LL84Y6_J 2.83% 1.06% 1 0.88% 1 0.53% 0.18% 0.18% 1 0.5391 1 4.77% 1 0.18% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,613 SPOT CRASH RATE: 61.118 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 13.015 01/01/16 Fri 1111 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 2 14.168 01/01/16 Fri 1130 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 15.269 01/02/16 Sat 1026 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 4 11.107 01/02/16 Sat 1444 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing S 0.000 01/02/16 Sat 0920 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 12.002 01/02/16 Sat 1255 Not Coded 9 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 20.924 01/03/16 Sun 0245 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 8 27.255 01/04/16 Mon 0758 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 26.014 01/04/16 Mon 1305 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 18.432 01/05/16 Tue 1347 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 19.442 01/06/16 Wed 0800 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 18.680 01/06/16 1 Wed 1241 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 13 29.295 01/08/16 Fri 1207 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 17.695 01/09/16 Sat 1753 Left-Turn 0 4 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 9.309 01/09/16 Sat 1025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 25.658 01/09/16 Sat 1410 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 21.225 01/10/16 Sun 2023 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 27.615 01/11/16 Mon 1035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 19 30.224 01/11/16 Mon 1552 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 20 7.236 01/12/16 Tue 1348 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 21 8.241 01/12/16 Tue 1343 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 22 26.674 01/13/16 Wed 1545 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-of-Way 23 27.504 01/17/16 Sun 1612 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 24 26.908 01/17/16 Sun 1330 Backed Into 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 25 24.373 01/18/16 Mon 1156 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 26.674 01/18/16 Mon 1619 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 17.662 01/18/16 1 Mon 1717 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 9.709 01/18/16 Mon 1250 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 9.709 01/18/16 Mon 1252 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 30 12.214 01/19/16 Tue 1441 1 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 16.336 01/19/16 Tue 1619 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 27.502 01/20/16 Wed 1316 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 24.539 01/21/16 Thu 0700 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 34 29.548 01/22/16 Fri 1851 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 35 24.522 01/24/16 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 23.234 01/25/16 Mon 0720 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 37 14.466 01/25/16 Mon 1155 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 7.236 01/26/16 Tue 1717 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 27.239 01/26/16 Tue 2111 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 21.230 01/26/16 Tue 0315 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 21.264 01/27/16 Wed 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 42 16.346 01/28/16 Thu 1745 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 25.197 01/29/16 Fri 1552 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 10.573 01/29/16 Fri 1725 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 45 7.670 01/29/16 Fri 2150 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 18.150 01/29/16 Fri 1342 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 16.436 01/29/16 Fri 1815 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 28.108 01/30/16 Sat 0923 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 13.352 01/30/16 Sat 1854 Rear-End 0 5 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 50 27.883 01/31/16 Sun 1715 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 30.906 01/31/16 Sun 1425 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 52 27.504 02/02/16 Tue 1915 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 9.715 02/02/16 Tue 0940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 54 17.695 02/04/16 Thu 1440 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 55 9.236 02/04/16 Thu 1446 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 56 14.168 02/04/16 Thu 1315 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 28.530 02/04/16 Thu 0826 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 58 38.484 02/05/16 Fri 0330 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 59 16.048 02/05/16 Fri 1542 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 33.921 02/05/16 Fri 2012 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 32.779 02/05/16 Fri 0740 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 0.000 02/06/16 Sat 0730 Mailbox 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 63 28.208 02/07/16 Sun 1835 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 64 25.383 02/08/16 Mon 1457 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 24.119 02/08/16 Mon 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 9.696 02/08/16 Mon 1050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 13.252 02/09/16 Tue 1335 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 27.614 02/09/16 Tue 0640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 23.234 02/09/16 Tue 0835 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 23.342 02/11/16 Thu 1005 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 12.214 02/12/16 Fri 1324 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 72 16.343 02/12/16 Fri 1500 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 73 9.592 02/12/16 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 27.215 02/13/16 Sat 1900 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 75 29.038 02/13/16 Sat 1040 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 76 8.565 02/14/16 Sun 1905 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 77 14.158 02/14/16 Sun 1845 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 16.707 02/14/16 Sun 0925 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner 79 26.684 02/14/16 Sun 1150 Angle 0 1 0 Da Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 38.737 02/14/16 Sun 1455 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 81 7.141 02/15/16 Mon 1710 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 82 28.969 02/16/16 Tue 1115 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 83 28.633 02/17/16 Wed 0218 Head-On 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 84 16.346 02/18/16 Thu 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 85 30.049 02/18/16 Thu 1421 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 86 17.671 02/18/16 Thu 1212 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 87 16.139 02/19/16 Fri 1226 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 17.696 02/19/16 Fri 1306 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 27.505 02/21/16 Sun 0616 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 90 30.932 02/21/16 Sun 1240 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 91 13.959 02/22/16 1 Mon 1050 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 92 2.605 02/23/16 Tue 1025 Right-Turn 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 93 15.893 02/23/16 Tue 0735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 94 37.718 02/23/16 Tue 0855 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 95 9.965 02/23/16 Tue 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 29.308 02/23/16 Tue 1250 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 97 32.142 02/23/16 Tue 1243 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 98 18.835 02/23/16 Tue 1515 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 99 25.828 02/24/16 Wed 2208 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 100 20.752 02/24/16 Wed 1533 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 101 20.752 02/24/16 Wed 1611 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 102 10.177 02/25/16 Thu 1524 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 103 16.699 02/26/16 Fri 2210 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 104 5.212 02/26/16 Fri 0705 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 29.377 02/26/16 Fri 0801 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 106 9.965 02/26/16 Fri 1125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 0.237 02/26/16 Fri 1430 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 108 26.872 02/26/16 Fri 1606 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 109 9.672 02/26/16 Fri 1140 Fence 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 18.266 02/27/16 Sat 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 111 26.989 02/27/16 Sat 1048 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 9.573 02/27/16 Sat 1637 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 113 16.715 02/27/16 Sat 1857 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 9.965 02/28/16 Sun 1025 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 115 31.748 02/29/16 Mon 1712 Tree(Standing) 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 116 18.266 02/29/16 Mon 1710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 26.024 02/29/16 Mon 1826 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 118 0.000 02/29/16 Mon 1040 Backedlnto 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 119 19.633 02/29/16 Mon 1255 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 10.507 03/01/16 Tue 1200 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 121 12.058 03/02/16 Wed 2123 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 122 31.331 03/02/16 Wed 1435 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 26.024 03/03/16 Thu 1020 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 124 7.236 03/03/16 Thu 1559 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 125 0.234 03/04/16 Fri 1300 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 126 25.904 03/04/16 Fri 1337 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 127 23.182 03/04/16 Fri 1506 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 128 34.355 03/05/16 Sat 1005 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 129 28.780 03/05/16 Sat 1105 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 25.387 03/05/16 Sat 1315 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 131 15.699 03/07/16 Mon 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 132 25.178 03/07/16 Mon 0755 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 133 17.638 03/08/16 Tue 2232 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 134 9.715 03/08/16 Tue 0840 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 135 14.518 03/08/16 Tue 1745 Mailbox 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 136 32.089 03/09/16 Wed 1858 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 137 29.306 03/09/16 Wed 1140 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 138 25.197 03/09/16 Wed 1458 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 139 10.589 03/10/16 Thu 1309 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 15.443 03/12/16 Sat 1231 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 141 10.177 03/12/16 Sat 1910 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 142 26.683 03/12/16 Sat 0905 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 143 30.788 03/12/16 Sat 1905 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 144 28.897 03/13/16 Sun 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 145 12.164 03/13/16 Sun 1130 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 29.992 03/13/16 Sun 2235 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 147 16.134 03/14/16 Mon 1320 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 148 13.743 03/14/16 Mon 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 149 13.631 03/15/16 Tue 1211 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 150 12.119 03/15/16 Tue 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 151 17.746 03/16/16 Wed 1544 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 152 11.715 03/16/16 Wed 1616 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 153 28.983 03/17/16 Thu 1151 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 154 20.953 03/17/16 Thu 1949 Left-Turn 1 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 155 31.306 03/18/16 Fri 1533 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 156 27.503 03/19/16 Sat 0651 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 157 12.240 03/19/16 Sat 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 158 34.820 03/19/16 Sat 1221 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 159 13.748 03/19/16 Sat 1448 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 160 9.715 03/19/16 Sat 1636 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 161 12.002 03/20/16 Sun 1620 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 162 15.452 03/21/16 Mon 1349 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 163 27.115 03/22/16 Tue 1700 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 164 10.554 03/22/16 Tue 1455 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 165 3.699 03/23/16 Wed 1044 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 166 31.517 03/24/16 Thu 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 167 16.128 03/24/16 Thu 1105 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 168 12.214 03/25/16 Fri 1740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 169 38.769 03/25/16 Fri 0749 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 170 14.872 03/25/16 1 Fri 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 171 31.005 03/26/16 Sat 1406 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 172 14.217 03/26/16 Sat 1610 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 173 36.913 03/26/16 Sat 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 174 23.780 03/28/16 Mon 1446 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 175 16.377 03/28/16 Mon 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 176 25.615 03/29/16 Tue 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 177 0.025 03/30/16 Wed 1557 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 178 12.107 03/30/16 Wed 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 179 27.504 03/31/16 Thu 0155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 180 26.684 03/31/16 Thu 1430 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 181 0.902 03/31/16 Thu 2042 Tree(Standing) 0 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 182 29.325 03/31/16 Thu 1841 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 183 34.920 03/31/16 Thu 0433 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 184 26.683 04/01/16 Fri 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 185 8.457 04/02/16 Sat 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 186 15.512 04/02/16 Sat 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 187 10.554 04/02/16 Sat 0838 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 188 1.536 04/03/16 Sun 2004 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 189 18.275 04/05/16 Tue 0809 Angle 0 2 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 190 17.313 04/05/16 Tue 1609 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 191 20.424 04/05/16 Tue 1750 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 192 20.368 04/05/16 Tue 1900 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 193 4.219 04/05/16 Tue 1044 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 194 7.554 04/06/16 Wed 2208 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 195 29.193 04/07/16 Thu 0835 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 196 6.247 04/07/16 Thu 2126 Left-Turn 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 197 2.686 04/08/16 Fri 0856 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 198 28.180 04/08/16 Fri 0830 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 199 9.668 04/08/16 Fri 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 200 9.715 04/08/16 Fri 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 201 32.586 04/09/16 Sat 0909 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 202 7.574 04/09/16 Sat 1225 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 203 14.976 04/09/16 Sat 2007 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 204 14.742 04/10/16 Sun 0231 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 205 11.554 04/10/16 Sun 2040 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 206 13.257 04/11/16 Mon 1050 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 207 22.198 04/12/16 Tue 1135 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 208 14.217 04/13/16 Wed 1619 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 209 23.869 04/15/16 Fri 1205 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 210 18.275 04/15/16 Fri 1355 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 211 3.331 04/15/16 Fri 2200 Head-On 2 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 212 3.231 04/16/16 Sat 0030 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 213 6.247 04/16/16 Sat 0200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 214 25.284 04/16/16 Sat 1330 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 215 14.198 04/17/16 Sun 0955 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 216 26.872 04/17/16 Sun 1125 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 217 32.089 04/17/16 Sun 1835 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 218 28.410 04/19/16 Tue 0921 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 219 27.115 04/21/16 Thu 0953 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 220 23.977 04/21/16 Thu 0650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 221 13.717 04/21/16 Thu 1446 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 222 20.246 04/23/16 Sat 0149 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 223 12.102 04/23/16 Sat 1215 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 224 12.999 04/23/16 Sat 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 225 0.000 04/25/16 Mon 1600 Backed Into 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 226 10.472 04/25/16 Mon 1305 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 227 18.441 04/26/16 Tue 1941 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 228 16.721 04/26/16 Tue 1455 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 229 18.430 04/26/16 Tue 1716 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 230 16.143 04/27/16 Wed 0731 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 231 20.718 04/28/16 Thu 0215 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 232 18.259 04/28/16 Thu 2005 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 233 25.649 04/30/16 Sat 1049 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 234 38.775 04/30/16 Sat 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 235 14.780 04/O5/30/16/16 Sat 1200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 236 24.199 O1 Sun 1155 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 237 9.223 O5/O1/16 Sun 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 238 26.674 05/02/16 Mon 1931 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 239 27.495 05/03/16 Tue 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 240 17.661 05/05/16 Thu 1256 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 241 27.115 05/05/16 Thu 0520 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 242 27.115 05/05/16 Thu 0645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 243 9.729 05/05/16 Thu 0741 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 244 29.848 05/05/16 Thu 1715 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 245 25.905 05/06/16 Fri 2240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 246 25.905 05/06/16 Fri 2250 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 247 19.226 05/09/16 Mon 1544 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 248 31.278 05/11/16 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 249 21.422 05/13/16 1 Fri 1205 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 250 5.374 05/15/16 Sun 1230 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 251 8.120 05/15/16 Sun 1900 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 252 8.120 05/15/16 Sun 1958 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 253 32.918 05/15/16 Sun 1115 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 254 17.990 05/18/16 Wed 0710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 255 10.354 05/19/16 Thu 0230 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 256 12.883 05/19/16 Thu 1332 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 257 17.652 05/20/16 Fri 0637 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 258 9.736 05/20/16 Fri 1705 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 259 11.107 05/20/16 Fri 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 260 13.717 05/21/16 Sat 2045 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 261 23.594 05/22/16 Sun 1116 Tree(Standing) 0 4 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 262 11.107 05/25/16 Wed 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 263 20.682 05/25/16 Wed 1340 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 264 9.639 05/25/16 Wed 1119 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 265 25.383 05/25/16 Wed 1130 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 266 17.795 05/26/16 Thu 0730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 267 25.048 05/26/16 Thu 0950 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 268 16.266 05/26/16 Thu 1205 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 269 27.504 05/27/16 Fri 1545 Left-Turn 0 4 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 270 28.774 05/27/16 Fri 2221 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 271 16.096 05/28/16 Sat 1512 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 272 13.256 05/28/16 Sat 1349 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 273 0.000 05/28/16 Sat 1200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 274 12.442 05/29/16 Sun 0316 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 275 13.070 05/29/16 Sun 1615 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 276 25.834 05/29/16 Sun 1812 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 277 9.715 05/29/16 Sun 2300 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 278 12.050 05/29/16 Sun 1648 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 279 12.402 05/31/16 Tue 1310 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 280 20.231 05/31/16 Tue 1830 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 281 37.914 06/O1/16 Wed 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 282 21.481 06/01/16 Wed 1224 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 283 18.835 06/02/16 Thu 1830 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 284 0.000 06/03/16 Fri 0305 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 285 31.837 06/03/16 Fri 0731 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 286 13.559 06/04/16 Sat 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 287 35.734 06/04/16 Sat 1117 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 288 23.682 06/05/16 Sun 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 289 21.725 06/05/16 Sun 1825 Head-On 0 1 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 290 23.182 06/06/16 Mon 1138 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 291 15.042 06/06/16 Mon 2205 Angle 0 6 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 292 18.290 06/06/16 Mon 1954 Fence 0 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 293 25.815 06/06/16 Mon 1035 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 294 13.070 06/07/16 Tue 1455 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 295 16.162 06/10/16 Fri 1757 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 296 18.455 06/11/16 Sat 0600 Fence 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 297 28.539 06/12/16 Sun 0013 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 298 19.088 06/12/16 Sun 1335 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 299 22.236 06/12/16 Sun 1934 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 300 25.640 06/13/16 Mon 1753 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 301 8.130 06/13/16 Mon 1133 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 302 27.239 06/13/16 Mon 1805 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 303 14.837 06/14/16 Tue 1415 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 304 26.320 06/15/16 Wed 1010 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 305 15.450 06/15/16 Wed 2253 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 306 25.415 06/16/16 Thu 1100 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 307 27.298 06/17/16 Fri 1234 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 308 14.597 06/17/16 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 309 14.999 06/18/16 Sat 1020 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 310 12.702 06/19/16 Sun 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 311 9.582 06/19/16 Sun 1449 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 312 9.165 06/19/16 Sun 2116 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 313 20.225 06/19/16 Sun 1623 Rear-End 1 0 1 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 314 12.224 06/19/16 Sun 0922 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 315 6.736 06/19/16 Sun 1100 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 316 25.753 06/19/16 Sun 1055 Rear-End 1 0 1 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 317 31.498 06/21/16 Tue 1557 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 318 0.076 06/21/16 Tue 1841 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 319 14.111 06/22/16 Wed 0039 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 320 30.216 06/22/16 Wed 1518 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 321 20.235 06/22/16 Wed 0740 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 322 28.601 06/22/16 Wed 1330 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 323 16.298 06/23/16 Thu 1635 Pedestrian 0 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 324 30.215 06/24/16 Fri 1220 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 325 1.216 06/24/16 Fri 1152 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 326 22.198 06/24/16 Fri 1555 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 327 15.261 06/25/16 Sat 1603 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 328 7.715 06/26/16 1 Sun 1447 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 329 22.179 06/26/16 Sun 1649 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 330 18.774 06/27/16 Mon 2151 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 331 12.302 06/27/16 Mon 1952 Head-On 3 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 332 18.266 06/27/16 Mon 1820 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 333 25.910 06/28/16 Tue 1420 Thrown or Falling Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 334 16.626 06/28/16 Tue 0520 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Other Contributing Action 335 8.149 06/29/16 Wed 2201 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 336 9.715 06/29/16 Wed 0937 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 337 8.336 06/29/16 Wed 1620 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 338 25.072 06/30/16 Thu 1715 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 339 9.677 07/01/16 Fri 1502 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 340 0.000 07/02/16 Sat 1500 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 341 21.351 07/04/16 Mon 1143 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 342 27.388 07/05/16 Tue 1112 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 343 27.113 07/05/16 Tue 1507 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 344 9.065 07/05/16 Tue 1609 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 345 9.515 07/07/16 Thu 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 346 29.334 07/08/16 Fri 1229 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 347 23.774 07/08/16 Fri 1310 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 348 33.921 07/09/16 Sat 1000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 349 16.204 07/10/16 Sun 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 350 9.217 07/10/16 Sun 1610 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 351 27.595 07/11/16 Mon 1102 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 352 18.899 07/12/16 Tue 1220 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 353 17.772 07/12/16 Tue 1522 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 354 17.697 07/13/16 Wed 0850 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 355 25.717 07/14/16 Thu 0900 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 356 2.301 07/14/16 Thu 1810 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 357 16.285 07/15/16 Fri 1309 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 358 2.042 07/15/16 Fri 1346 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 359 16.128 07/15/16 Fri 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 360 25.681 07/16/16 Sat 1515 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 361 17.751 07/16/16 Sat 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 362 6.247 07/16/16 Sat 1605 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 363 0.000 07/16/16 Sat 0225 Fence 0 1 0 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 364 12.214 07/16/16 Sat 1710 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 365 20.235 07/17/16 Sun 0400 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 366 7.899 07/17/16 Sun 1628 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 367 7.414 07/17/16 Sun 0430 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 368 10.177 07/17/16 Sun 1616 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 369 38.604 07/18/16 Mon 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 370 17.317 07/18/16 Mon 1546 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 371 16.700 07/18/16 Mon 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 372 17.764 07/20/16 Wed 1225 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 373 14.217 07/21/16 Thu 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 374 29.325 07/21/16 Thu 1250 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 375 16.318 07/21/16 Thu 1503 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 376 16.166 07/21/16 Thu 1504 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 377 36.734 07/22/16 Fri 1710 Fence 0 1 2 0 1 Day Wet Improper Passing 378 9.715 07/22/16 Fri 1524 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 379 0.902 07/22/16 Fri 0455 Tree(Standing) 0 4 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 380 32.349 07/22/16 Fri 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 381 8.104 07/22/16 Fri 1316 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 382 17.614 07/23/16 Sat 1528 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 383 16.147 07/23/16 Sat 1154 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 384 1.042 07/24/16 Sun 1501 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 385 4.699 07/25/16 Mon 1545 Rear-End 0 1 8 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 386 23.021 07/26/16 Tue 1830 Rear-End 0 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 387 11.714 07/27/16 Wed 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 388 25.383 07/27/16 Wed 1337 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 389 18.899 07/28/16 Thu 1202 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 390 19.433 07/28/16 Thu 1612 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 391 11.969 07/30/16 Sat 1445 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 392 6.747 07/30/161 Sat 1700 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 393 29.743 07/31/16 Sun 0800 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 394 0.027 07/31/16 Sun 1254 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 395 1 8.999 07/31/16 Sun 1520 Rear-End 0 2 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 396 16.071 07/31/16 Sun 0851 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 397 9.482 07/31/16 Sun 0945 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 398 26.872 07/31/16 Sun 1305 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 399 30.337 08/01/16 Mon 0701 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 400 25.655 08/03/16 Wed 0902 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 401 16.655 08/03/16 Wed 1016 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 402 24.377 08/05/16 Fri 1235 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 403 14.217 08/05/16 Fri 1751 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 404 18.899 08/05/16 Fri 2100 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 405 11.666 08/06/16 Sat 2218 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 406 32.918 08/07/16 Sun 1435 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 407 0.595 08/07/16 1 Sun 2310 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 408 33.921 08/07/16 Sun 1736 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 409 32.095 08/08/16 Mon 0807 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 410 25.986 08/10/16 Wed 2135 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 411 25.383 08/10/16 Wed 1538 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 412 2.501 08/10/16 Wed 1717 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 413 17.700 08/10/16 Wed 1624 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 414 18.890 08/10/16 Wed 2109 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 415 26.187 08/11/16 Thu 2045 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 416 9.715 08/11/16 Thu 2112 Angle 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 417 11.952 08/12/16 Fri 0300 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 418 22.209 08/12/16 Fri 0715 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 419 27.355 08/12/16 Fri 1702 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 420 4.201 08/13/16 Sat 1345 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 421 13.699 08/13/16 Sat 1648 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 422 15.893 08/13/16 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 423 8.557 08/13/16 Sat 2012 Other Non-Collision 0 0 Night Wet Other Contributing Action 424 9.236 08/13/16 Sat 1215 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 425 15.449 08/14/16 Sun 0130 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 426 23.191 08/14/16 Sun 1510 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 427 10.025 08/14/16 Sun 1555 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 428 0.082 08/14/16 Sun 2040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 429 25.392 08/15/16 Mon 1437 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 430 14.559 08/15/16 Mon 1015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 431 0.196 08/16/16 Tue 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 432 15.198 08/17/16 Wed 1448 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 433 33.426 08/19/16 Fri 1615 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 434 7.236 08/23/16 Tue 1030 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 435 16.368 08/26/16 Fri 0735 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 436 25.640 08/28/16 Sun 1155 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 437 16.299 08/29/16 Mon 1353 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Wet Improper Turn 438 25.649 08/29/16 Mon 0515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 439 17.171 08/30/16 Tue 1345 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 440 12.883 08/31/16 Wed 1117 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 441 29.039 08/31/16 Wed 1542 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 442 28.113 08/31/16 Wed 1725 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 443 16.711 09/02/16 Fri 1736 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 444 28.108 09/03/16 Sat 1405 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 445 9.215 09/03/16 Sat 2125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 446 18.436 09/03/16 Sat 0857 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 447 7.699 09/03/16 Sat 2010 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 448 11.902 09/04/16 Sun 1135 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 449 19.233 09/04/16 Sun 0916 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 450 27.235 09/05/16 Mon 1620 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 451 7.321 09/05/16 Mon 1830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 452 28.225 09/06/16 Tue 0545 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 453 27.495 09/08/16 Thu 1744 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 454 27.498 09/08/16 Thu 1619 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 455 29.848 09/09/16 Fri 2240 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 456 29.067 09/09/16 Fri 0008 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 457 17.672 09/10/16 Sat 0550 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 458 0.468 09/10/16 Sat 0527 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 459 15.518 09/12/16 Mon 0740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 460 24.187 09/12/16 Mon 0755 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 461 26.024 09/12/16 Mon 1416 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 462 16.711 09/16/16 Fri 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 463 16.336 09/16/16 Fri 2004 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 464 17.671 09/17/16 Sat 0129 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Red Light 465 5.715 09/17/16 Sat 1435 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 466 7.899 09/17/16 Sat 1916 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 467 31.970 09/17/16 Sat 1100 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 468 23.182 09/18/16 Sun 1245 Tree(Standing) 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 469 32.100 09/18/16 Sun 0116 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 470 7.715 09/18/16 Sun 1125 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 471 38.545 09/19/16 Mon 1501 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 472 23.282 09/19/16 Mon 1348 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 473 24.448 09/20/16 Tue 1210 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 474 27.642 09/21/16 Wed 1455 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 475 15.043 09/22/16 Thu 2001 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 476 25.908 09/23/16 Fri 0715 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 477 11.107 09/23/16 Fri 2329 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 478 18.258 09/23/16 Fri 1644 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 479 26.405 09/23/16 Fri 1500 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 480 5.715 09/24/16 Sat 1743 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 481 23.869 09/24/16 Sat 0625 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 482 12.702 09/25/16 Sun 0940 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 483 24.448 09/30/16 Fri 1145 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 484 6.715 09/30/16 Fri 1819 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 485 14.130 09/30/16 Fri 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 486 9.715 10/02/16 1 Sun 1055 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 487 4.536 10/03/16 Mon 0900 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 488 25.197 10/05/16 Wed 2200 Animal 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 489 38.234 10/08/16 Sat 0100 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 490 18.794 10/10/16 Mon 1319 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 491 27.317 10/10/16 Mon 2039 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 492 28.637 10/10/16 Mon 1427 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 493 25.915 10/10/16 Mon 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 494 27.502 10/10/16 Mon 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 495 10.154 10/11/16 Tue 2230 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Not Coded 496 18.771 10/12/16 Wed 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 497 14.800 10/12/16 Wed 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 498 25.893 10/12/16 Wed 1540 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 499 27.359 10/13/16 Thu 1720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 500 13.918 10/14/16 Fri 0916 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 501 12.900 10/14/16 Fri 1217 Angle 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 502 27.449 10/15/16 Sat 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 503 27.428 10/16/16 Sun 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 504 21.007 10/17/16 Mon 0905 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 505 21.014 10/17/16 Mon 1225 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 506 16.171 10/17/16 Mon 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 507 26.851 10/18/16 Tue 0645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 508 26.015 10/19/16 Wed 0735 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 509 32.349 10/20/16 Thu 1635 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 510 7.893 10/21/16 Fri 1100 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 511 8.241 10/21/16 Fri 1020 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 512 0.699 10/22/16 Sat 1620 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 513 37.912 10/23/16 Sun 0910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 514 15.261 10/23/16 Sun 1205 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 515 27.614 10/24/16 Mon 1400 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 516 27.642 10/24/16 Mon 1411 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 517 26.783 10/24/16 Mon 1516 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 518 9.715 10/24/16 Mon 1210 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 519 19.088 10/26/16 Wed 0353 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 520 12.911 10/27/16 Thu 1013 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 521 16.702 10/28/16 Fri 1847 Left-Turn 0 4 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 522 26.376 10/29/16 Sat 1933 Angle 0 2 0 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 523 10.354 10/30/16 Sun 2240 Tree(Standing) 0 0 Night Wet Improper Passing 524 26.684 10/30/16 Sun 2100 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 525 17.699 10/31/16 Mon 1202 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 526 15.450 10/31/16 Mon 1619 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Ran Stop Sign 527 17.702 10/31/16 Mon 1140 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 528 16.368 10/31/16 Mon 1310 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 529 15.170 11/01/16 Tue 1504 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 530 27.674 11/03/16 Thu 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 531 18.794 11/04/16 Fri 0655 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 532 18.298 11/04/16 Fri 0900 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 533 20.235 11/05/16 Sat 2247 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 534 24.352 11/07/16 Mon 1441 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 535 32.426 11/08/16 Tue 0930 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 536 27.508 11/08/16 Tue 1802 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 537 18.899 11/08/16 Tue 2045 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 538 27.888 11/08/16 Tue 1956 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 539 17.700 11/08/16 Tue 0820 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 540 16.711 11/09/16 Wed 1434 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 541 18.899 11/11/16 Fri 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 542 33.921 11/12/16 Sat 1201 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 543 7.236 11/13/16 Sun 2020 Work Zone/Maintenance Equip. 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 544 26.000 11/13/16 Sun 2240 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 545 25.905 11/15/16 Tue 2142 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 546 28.065 11/15/16 Tue 1150 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 547 17.695 11/16/16 Wed 1904 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 548 25.309 11/17/16 Thu 1121 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 549 26.505 11/17/16 Thu 1814 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 550 23.878 11/18/16 Fri 2130 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 551 9.877 11/20/16 Sun 1020 Backed Into 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 552 29.426 11/20/16 Sun 1210 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 553 15.916 11/20/16 Sun 0240 Rear-End 1 0 1 1 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 554 0.204 11/20/16 Sun 0801 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 555 17.695 11/23/16 Wed 1834 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 556 18.126 11/24/16 Thu 0545 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 557 30.692 11/25/16 Fri 1005 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 558 2.536 11/25/16 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 559 14.150 11/25/16 Fri 1350 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 560 18.899 11/26/16 Sat 0810 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 561 18.899 11/26/16 Sat 1343 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 562 14.680 11/27/16 Sun 1058 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 563 14.704 11/27/16 Sun 1212 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 564 31.926 11/27/16 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 565 12.202 11/28/16 Mon 1025 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 566 30.168 11/28/16 Mon 1758 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 567 22.198 11/28/16 Mon 1945 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 568 21.909 11/28/16 Mon 2028 Fence 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 569 17.699 11/29/16 Tue 0750 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 570 14.699 11/29/16 Tue 2327 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 571 0.000 11/29/16 Tue 0015 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 572 15.040 11/29/16 Tue 0733 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 573 13.925 11/29/16 Tue 1850 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 574 15.040 11/29/16 Tue 1548 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 575 24.972 11/29/16 Tue 1515 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 576 7.715 11/30/16 Wed 1000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 577 18.257 11/30/16 Wed 1839 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 578 25.421 12/01/16 Thu 0750 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 579 25.772 12/01/16 Thu 1140 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 580 23.591 12/02/16 Fri 1300 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 581 11.105 12/05/16 Mon 1905 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 582 17.752 12/06/16 Tue 1123 Curb 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 583 27.233 12/07/16 Wed 0800 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 584 27.490 12/08/16 Thu 1055 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Not Coded 585 28.275 12/08/16 Thu 0301 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 586 0.498 12/11/16 Sun 2030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 587 19.365 12/12/16 Mon 1330 Mailbox 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 588 25.620 12/14/16 Wed 0910 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 589 26.869 12/14/16 Wed 0930 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 590 25.165 12/14/16 Wed 1738 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 591 12.452 12/14/16 Wed 1250 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 592 29.170 12/15/16 Thu 1000 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 593 0.003 12/15/16 Thu 1010 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 594 33.756 12/15/16 Thu 0722 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 595 18.835 12/15/16 Thu 0825 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 596 22.514 12/17/16 Sat 2019 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 597 24.161 12/18/16 Sun 1549 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 598 23.163 12/20/16 Tue 1212 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 599 29.032 12/22/16 Thu 2359 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 600 8.249 12/22/16 Thu 0615 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 601 31.297 12/22/16 Thu 1804 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 602 13.458 12/22/16 Thu 1405 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 603 25.904 12/23/16 Fri 2015 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 604 9.839 12/25/16 Sun 1100 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 605 29.536 12/26/16 Mon 1615 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 606 12.496 12/26/16 Mon 1850 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 607 27.507 12/27/16 Tue 1730 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 608 17.662 12/27/16 Tue 1125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 609 17.662 12/27/16 Tue 1205 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 610 16.152 12/28/16 Wed 1359 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 611 16.703 12/28/16 Wed 0914 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 612 30.470 12/29/16 Thu 1244 Rear-End 1 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 613 25.743 12/31/16 Sat 1134 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 613 11 215 391 292 4 126 20 3 43 4 16 4 63 0 12 Percent 1.79% 35.07% 63.78% 47.63% 0.65% 20.55% 3.26% 0.49% 7.01% 0.65% 2.61% 0.65% 10.28% 0.00% 1.96% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 475 138 62 551 301 120 14 6 7 4 0 3 5 40 4 Percent 77.4996 22.51% 1 10.119% 89.89% 1 49.10% 1 19.58% 2.28% 1 0.98% 1 1.14% 1 0.65% 0.00% 0.49% 1 0.82% 1 6.5396 1 0.65% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,613 SPOT CRASH RATE: 68.160 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 20.701 01/01/17 Sun 0144 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 2 25.197 01/01/17 Sun 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 27.374 01/01/17 Sun 1745 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 38.618 01/02/17 Mon 1005 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner S 16.299 01/03/17 Tue 1528 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 6 16.359 01/03/17 Tue 2210 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 14.875 01/03/17 Tue 1540 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 32.918 01/04/17 Wed 0840 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 17.614 01/04/17 Wed 1305 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 8.241 01/08/17 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 18.884 01/08/17 Sun 2055 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 12 26.775 01/09/17 1 Mon 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 24.377 01/12/17 Thu 1330 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 14 7.814 01/12/17 Thu 1700 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 15 21.277 01/13/17 Fri 1021 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 20.226 01/14/17 Sat 0540 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 18.899 01/14/17 Sat 0940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 17.671 01/14/17 Sat 0200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 28.510 01/1S/17 Sun 1700 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 5.212 01/17/17 Tue 1209 Backed Into 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Backing 21 27.504 01/17/17 Tue 1145 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 22 27.504 01/19/17 Thu 1544 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 23 23.980 01/20/17 Fri 1645 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 24 29.556 01/21/17 Sat 1612 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 25 16.444 01/21/17 Sat 1745 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 26 29.771 01/22/17 Sun 1025 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 27 27.348 01/22/17 Sun 1401 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 21.986 01/24/17 Tue 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 18.099 01/25/17 Wed 0720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 20.758 01/25/17 Wed 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 31 25.718 01/25/17 Wed 1507 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 11.952 01/25/17 Wed 1259 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 33 3.806 01/26/17 Thu 1050 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 34 14.112 01/26/17 Thu 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 28.180 01/27/17 Fri 0759 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 36 27.344 01/27/17 Fri 2235 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 30.120 01/28/17 Sat 1526 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 30.673 01/30/17 Mon 0554 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 39 8.301 01/31/17 Tue 1731 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 29.104 02/01/17 Wed 1650 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 41 26.721 02/03/17 Fri 1205 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 13.866 02/04/17 Sat 1336 Rear-End 0 13 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 43 17.371 02/04/17 Sat 0325 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 27.401 02/OS/17 Sun 1440 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4S 11.483 02/06/17 Mon 1407 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 32.640 02/07/17 Tue 0825 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 47 35.916 02/08/17 Wed 1120 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 18.899 02/09/17 Thu 2047 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 8.241 02/09/17 Thu 1945 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 50 21.191 02/09/17 Thu 1620 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 16.896 02/10/17 Fri 1215 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 52 5.321 02/11/17 Sat 1713 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 31.201 02/12/17 Sun 1540 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 54 9.772 02/12/17 Sun 1815 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 55 1 16.134 02/14/17 1 Tue 1214 1 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 10.517 02/14/17 Tue 1157 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 28.919 02/15/17 Wed 1710 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 58 25.715 02/15/17 Wed 1407 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 19.099 02/15/17 Wed 0656 Guardrail Face 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 27.125 02/16/17 Thu 1712 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 61 16.343 02/17/17 Fri 1033 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 28.710 02/17/17 Fri 1830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 13.252 02/17/17 Fri 1030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 64 8.241 02/17/17 Fri 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 65 27.504 02/18/17 Sat 1550 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 66 10.215 02/19/17 Sun 1820 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 24.981 02/20/17 Mon 1625 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 68 32.435 02/20/17 Mon 0951 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 8.741 02/21/17 Tue 1416 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 26.401 02/21/17 Tue 1950 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 71 5.715 02/21/17 Tue 1241 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 72 21.699 02/22/17 Wed 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 73 25.197 02/22/17 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 74 27.076 02/24/17 Fri 1800 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7S 9.SS4 02/24/17 Fri 16SO Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 32.956 02/2S/17 Sat 2048 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 77 14.112 02/25/11 Sat 0844 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 18.506 02/26/17 Sun 1032 Rear-End 0 0 1 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner 79 11.107 02/26/17 Sun 1411 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 6.582 02/26/17 Sun 1556 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 81 30.196 02/26/17 Sun 1455 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 27.504 02/27/17 Mon 1425 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 83 38.718 02/27/17 Mon 0400 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 16.702 03/01/17 Wed 1745 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 22.699 03/02/17 Thu 1010 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 13.438 03/03/17 Fri 1057 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 21.293 03/03/17 Fri 0725 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 25.924 03/04/17 Sat 1023 Pedalcycle 0 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 89 9.668 03/05/17 Sun 1326 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 90 32.918 03/05/17 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 91 8.621 03/05/17 1 Sun 1141 Head-On 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 92 8.612 03/06/17 Mon 2050 Angle 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 93 31.584 03/08/17 Wed 1750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 94 13.584 03/09/17 Thu 1200 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 95 28.168 03/10/17 Fri 0620 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 21.193 03/11/17 Sat 1751 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 97 28.174 03/12/17 Sun 2022 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 98 22.098 03/13/17 Mon 1322 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 99 12.208 03/13/17 Mon 1551 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 100 18.487 03/13/17 Mon 1205 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 101 18.710 03/13/17 Mon 2200 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 31.331 03/14/17 Tue 1220 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 103 13.015 03/14/17 Tue 1223 Head-On 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 104 3.574 03/14/17 Tue 0100 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 25.620 03/15/17 Wed 1010 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 106 24.177 03/15/17 Wed 1215 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 20.777 03/17/17 Fri 0700 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 108 5.212 03/18/17 Sat 1830 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 109 2.781 03/18/17 Sat 2020 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 110 28.170 03/18/17 Sat 0455 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 111 25.197 03/19/17 Sun 0908 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 112 15.049 03/19/17 Sun 1425 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 113 10.177 03/19/17 Sun 1509 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 18.611 03/20/17 Mon 0827 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 115 18.266 03/20/17 Mon 0038 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 116 12.702 03/23/17 Thu 1015 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 25.904 03/24/17 Fri 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 118 18.861 03/26/17 Sun 1255 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 119 38.718 03/27/17 Mon 0800 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 120 23.832 03/27/17 Mon 1008 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 121 9.715 03/29/17 Wed 0958 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 122 30.081 03/31/17 Fri 2255 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 123 26.308 03/31/17 Fri 1718 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 124 36.218 04/O1/17 Sat 1550 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 125 9.629 04/O1/17 Sat 1240 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 126 36.756 04/02/17 Sun 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 127 32.089 04/02/17 Sun 1226 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 128 4.536 04/02/17 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 129 13.257 04/02/17 Sun 1715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 130 28.170 04/06/17 Thu 0800 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 131 23.182 04/07/17 Fri 1135 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 132 25.648 04/07/17 Fri 1956 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 133 26.005 04/08/17 Sat 0920 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 134 31.297 04/08/17 Sat 0300 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 135 36.256 04/09/17 Sun 2045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 136 13.252 04/09/17 Sun 1604 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 137 14.125 04/11/17 Tue 1540 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 138 31.118 04/13/17 Thu 1700 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 139 8.768 04/13/17 Thu 1629 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 9.236 04/13/17 Thu 0712 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 141 15.059 04/13/17 Thu 1132 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 142 15.269 04/14/17 Fri 1041 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 143 7.466 04/14/17 Fri 1800 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 144 37.718 04/15/17 Sat 1120 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 145 18.899 04/15/17 Sat 1915 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 31.256 04/16/17 Sun 2020 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 147 27.480 04/19/17 Wed 1540 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 148 17.671 04/20/17 Thu 0642 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 149 13.587 04/21/17 Fri 2058 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 150 25.650 04/21/17 Fri 2340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 151 26.182 04/21/17 Fri 1521 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 152 4.686 04/22/17 Sat 1708 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 153 14.699 04/29/17 Sat 1144 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 154 11.715 04/29/17 Sat 1319 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 155 2.042 04/30/17 Sun 1329 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 156 13.152 OS/O1/17 Mon 1050 Curb 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 157 27.504 05/01/17 Mon 1240 Angle 0 3 0 Day Wet Ran Red Light 158 10.554 05/O1/17 Mon 1415 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 159 22.519 05/01/17 Mon 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 160 5.212 05/01/17 Mon 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 161 24.152 05/02/17 Tue 0825 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 162 7.675 05/02/17 Tue 1543 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 163 14.227 05/03/17 Wed 1502 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 164 23.684 05/06/17 Sat 0612 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 165 32.677 05/07/17 Sun 1612 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 166 4.201 05/07/17 Sun 1910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 167 8.541 05/07/17 Sun 1243 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 168 27.614 05/07/17 Sun 1807 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 169 10.177 05/10/17 Wed 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 170 10.554 05/11/17 1 Thu 1240 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Not Coded 171 27.504 05/12/17 Fri 1002 Animal 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 172 12.702 05/14/17 Sun 0209 Embankment 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 173 34.920 05/14/17 Sun 1430 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 174 29.325 05/15/17 Mon 0830 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 175 28.108 05/15/17 Mon 1335 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 176 13.970 05/15/17 Mon 2015 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 177 0.042 05/15/17 Mon 1314 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 178 0.042 05/15/17 Mon 1411 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 179 1.960 05/16/17 Tue 0240 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 180 20.796 05/17/17 Wed 0919 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 181 17.317 05/17/17 Wed 1057 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 182 14.227 05/18/17 Thu 1420 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 183 16.702 05/18/17 Thu 0921 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 184 26.043 05/19/17 Fri 1256 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Other Careless or Negligent Manner 185 24.525 05/19/17 Fri 1025 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 186 25.899 05/19/17 Fri 0001 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 187 26.149 05/19/17 Fri 1550 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 188 27.614 05/20/17 Sat 0955 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 189 9.056 05/20/17 Sat 0838 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 190 20.953 05/20/17 Sat 2036 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 191 27.933 05/21/17 Sun 1550 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 192 26.414 05/23/17 Tue 0900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 193 18.899 05/25/17 Thu 1712 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 194 36.734 05/26/17 Fri 1845 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Wet Swerved Or Avoided 195 24.541 05/27/17 Sat 0845 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 196 28.756 05/27/17 Sat 1551 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 197 0.298 05/27/17 Sat 2100 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 198 10.241 05/27/17 Sat 1135 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 199 25.687 05/28/17 Sun 1950 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 200 8.564 05/28/17 Sun 2230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 201 27.500 05/28/17 Sun 2053 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 202 21.225 05/28/17 Sun 2148 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 203 9.046 05/29/17 Mon 1756 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 204 35.718 05/29/17 Mon 1305 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 205 18.871 05/30/17 Tue 1310 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 206 28.424 05/31/17 Wed 1640 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 207 27.115 05/31/17 Wed 1727 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 208 14.227 06/O1/17 Thu 0409 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 209 16.496 06/04/17 Sun 1400 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 210 28.615 06/04/17 Sun 1120 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 211 30.918 06/05/17 Mon 1605 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 212 18.290 06/05/17 Mon 1930 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 213 5.212 06/05/17 Mon 1324 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 214 12.554 06/05/17 Mon 1211 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 215 13.554 06/06/17 Tue 1408 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 216 26.674 06/10/17 Sat 2140 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 217 25.399 06/13/17 Tue 1705 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 218 33.275 06/14/17 Wed 1125 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 219 18.899 06/14/17 Wed 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 220 18.262 06/15/17 Thu 1447 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 221 30.906 06/16/17 Fri 1628 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 222 24.579 06/16/17 Fri 1827 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 223 17.445 06/18/17 Sun 2335 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Swerved Or Avoided 224 10.454 06/18/17 Sun 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 225 29.039 06/18/17 Sun 1455 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 226 20.909 06/18/17 Sun 1601 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 227 29.039 06/18/17 Sun 1700 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 228 30.503 06/18/17 Sun 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 229 18.539 06/19/17 Mon 0000 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 230 38.777 06/21/17 Wed 1715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 231 17.421 06/22/17 Thu 2240 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 232 19.226 06/23/17 Fri 0841 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 233 17.860 06/23/17 Fri 1119 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 234 14.217 06/24/17 Sat 1040 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 235 20.042 06/24/17 Sat 0954 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 236 12.214 06/24/17 Sat 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 237 10.177 06/27/17 Tue 2019 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 238 31.589 06/29/17 Thu 0745 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 239 28.634 06/30/17 Fri 0742 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 240 30.244 06/30/17 Fri 2330 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 241 25.880 06/30/17 Fri 2103 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 242 19.226 06/30/17 Fri 1450 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 243 16.122 07/01/17 Sat 1330 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 244 31.256 07/05/17 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 245 25.956 07/06/17 Thu 1720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 246 16.299 07/07/17 Fri 1500 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 247 8.112 07/08/17 Sat 0415 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 248 9.236 07/08/17 Sat 1335 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 249 34.920 07/08/17 1 Sat 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 250 24.133 07/09/17 Sun 0905 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 251 25.408 07/09/17 Sun 1720 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 252 25.899 07/10/17 Mon 0055 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 253 27.504 07/11/17 Tue 0030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 254 12.302 07/11/17 Tue 1110 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 255 27.876 07/12/17 Wed 1643 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 256 17.801 07/12/17 Wed 1922 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 257 17.317 07/13/17 Thu 0220 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 258 28.108 07/13/17 Thu 1222 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 259 36.734 07/14/17 Fri 1345 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 260 8.241 07/14/17 Fri 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 261 37.968 07/15/17 Sat 1330 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 262 30.243 07/16/17 Sun 1810 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 263 25.197 07/16/17 Sun 1702 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 264 23.182 07/16/17 Sun 1900 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 265 30.049 07/16/17 Sun 2006 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 266 14.227 07/17/17 Mon 1529 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 267 35.718 07/17/17 Mon 1318 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 268 24.377 07/20/17 Thu 0744 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 269 21.225 07/22/17 Sat 2133 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 270 26.005 07/22/17 Sat 1249 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 271 10.177 07/23/17 Sun 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 272 0.000 07/24/17 Mon 2000 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 273 22.198 07/25/17 Tue 0850 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 274 21.498 07/26/17 Wed 0701 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 275 11.107 07/26/17 Wed 1426 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 276 27.300 07/26/17 Wed 1727 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 277 0.228 07/27/17 Thu 1559 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 278 21.082 07/28/17 Fri 1716 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 279 10.559 07/29/17 Sat 1528 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 280 9.904 07/29/17 Sat 1850 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 281 25.198 07/29/17 Sat 1658 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 282 3.231 07/30/17 Sun 1450 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 283 32.256 07/30/17 Sun 1443 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 284 32.489 07/30/17 Sun 1626 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 285 30.244 07/30/17 Sun 2205 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 286 13.257 07/31/17 Mon 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 287 17.671 08/02/17 Wed 1723 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 288 18.275 08/03/17 Thu 1205 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 289 32.640 08/04/17 Fri 1123 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 290 8.545 08/04/17 Fri 2003 Not Coded 0 5 0 Night Dry Not Coded 291 31.451 08/04/17 Fri 1622 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 292 32.574 08/04/17 Fri 0808 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 293 14.217 08/05/17 Sat 1927 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 294 18.899 08/05/17 Sat 1050 Sideswipe 0 5 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 295 25.913 08/05/17 Sat 1311 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 296 29.193 08/05/17 Sat 1445 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 297 7.236 08/06/17 Sun 1442 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 298 14.227 08/06/17 Sun 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 299 33.921 08/06/17 Sun 1855 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 300 9.954 08/08/17 Tue 1140 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 301 31.503 08/10/17 Thu 1417 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 302 36.718 08/11/17 Fri 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 303 29.039 08/11/17 Fri 1654 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 304 35.718 08/11/17 Fri 1220 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 305 32.918 08/11/17 Fri 1335 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 306 9.236 08/11/17 Fri 1030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 307 21.225 08/12/17 Sat 2208 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 308 33.756 08/12/17 Sat 1015 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Backing 309 31.503 08/12/17 Sat 1215 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 310 16.702 08/12/17 Sat 1440 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 311 12.402 08/13/17 Sun 1035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 312 16.238 08/13/17 Sun 1215 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 313 31.503 08/13/17 Sun 1424 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 314 28.747 08/14/17 Mon 1600 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 315 32.465 08/18/17 Fri 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 316 25.646 08/18/17 Fri 1724 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 317 17.771 08/19/17 Sat 1040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 318 16.336 08/20/17 Sun 1735 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 319 25.904 08/20/17 Sun 0610 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 320 30.503 08/20/17 Sun 1544 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 321 27.671 08/20/17 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 322 27.506 08/22/17 Tue 0850 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 323 26.105 08/23/17 Wed 2030 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 324 0.250 08/23/17 Wed 0025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 325 25.710 08/25/17 Fri 0650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 326 21.598 08/26/17 Sat 2330 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 327 16.096 08/28/17 Mon 1213 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 328 17.671 08/28/17 1 Mon 1807 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 329 31.503 08/29/17 Tue 1424 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 330 6.247 08/31/17 Thu 2045 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 331 18.899 08/31/17 Thu 2020 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 332 27.459 08/31/17 Thu 1431 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 333 18.427 09/O1/17 Fri 1955 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 334 34.756 09/02/17 Sat 0925 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 335 35.756 09/02/17 Sat 1040 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 336 12.214 09/02/17 Sat 1517 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 337 25.897 09/02/17 Sat 1031 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 338 25.649 09/03/17 Sun 1922 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 339 37.934 09/03/17 Sun 1500 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 340 16.458 09/03/17 Sun 2200 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 341 29.137 09/04/17 Mon 0030 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 342 31.451 09/04/17 Mon 1421 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 343 9.719 09/05/17 Tue 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 344 4.226 09/06/17 Wed 1413 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 345 37.718 09/06/17 Wed 1206 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 346 18.899 09/07/17 Thu 1150 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 347 28.467 09/07/17 Thu 1814 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 348 25.324 09/15/17 Fri 1710 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 349 36.756 09/17/17 Sun 0935 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 350 16.261 09/17/17 Sun 1620 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 351 16.086 09/17/17 Sun 0851 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 352 16.190 09/17/17 Sun 1555 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 353 28.070 09/18/17 Mon 1945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 354 26.965 09/20/17 Wed 0720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 355 17.831 09/21/17 Thu 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 356 10.054 09/21/17 Thu 1635 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 357 28.728 09/21/17 Thu 1958 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 358 27.513 09/22/17 Fri 1608 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 359 15.465 09/22/17 Fri 0830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 360 20.187 09/22/17 Fri 1025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 361 17.471 09/22/17 Fri 1215 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 362 12.702 09/23/17 Sat 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 363 13.650 09/24/17 Sun 0643 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 364 25.649 09/24/17 Sun 1800 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 365 26.312 09/24/17 Sun 1852 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 366 23.275 09/25/17 Mon 0715 Guardrail Face 0 2 0 Day Wet Swerved Or Avoided 367 28.295 09/25/17 Mon 1734 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 368 27.343 09/27/17 Wed 1045 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 369 25.677 09/27/17 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 370 16.702 09/27/17 Wed 1828 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 371 10.687 09/27/17 Wed 1145 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 372 8.970 09/28/17 Thu 0615 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 373 3.536 09/28/17 Thu 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 374 25.677 09/28/17 Thu 1823 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 375 28.170 09/29/17 Fri 1300 Angle 0 3 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 376 17.671 09/29/17 Fri 2044 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 377 25.374 09/30/17 Sat 0817 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 378 21.988 10/01/17 Sun 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 379 7.306 10/01/17 Sun 1445 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 380 8.102 10/02/17 Mon 2220 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 381 29.303 10/02/17 Mon 1158 Pedestrian 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 382 28.304 10/02/17 Mon 1624 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 383 9.772 10/02/17 Mon 1940 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 384 12.452 10/03/17 Tue 0250 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 385 27.343 10/04/17 Wed 0730 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 386 11.016 10/04/17 Wed 1815 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 387 27.595 10/05/17 Thu 0710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 388 6.478 10/05/17 Thu 1115 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 389 27.614 10/06/17 Fri 1352 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 390 19.226 10/06/17 Fri 1533 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 391 24.161 10/07/17 Sat 1339 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 392 30.868 10/08/17 Sun 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 393 12.249 10/09/17 M on 1327 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 394 23.869 10/09/17 Mon 1204 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 395 11.016 10/09/17 Mon 1535 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 396 1.216 10/10/17 Tue 0550 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 397 13.803 10/11/17 Wed 2040 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 398 36.268 10/11/17 Wed 1236 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 399 25.651 10/12/17 Thu 1115 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 400 18.799 10/13/17 Fri 2223 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 401 18.835 10/13/17 Fri 1250 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 402 10.554 10/13/17 Fri 1633 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 403 8.554 10/13/17 Fri 2046 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 404 13.257 10/13/17 Fri 1605 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 405 10.158 10/15/17 Sun 1727 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 406 38.718 10/15/17 Sun 1844 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 407 25.197 10/16/17 1 Mon 0954 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 408 15.429 10/16/17 Mon 1211 Right-Turn 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 409 25.615 10/17/17 Tue 1015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 410 24.533 10/17/17 Tue 1820 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 411 8.249 10/17/17 Tue 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 412 21.207 10/18/17 Wed 1019 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 413 10.459 10/21/17 Sat 1650 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 414 28.170 10/22/17 Sun 1240 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 415 13.257 10/24/17 Tue 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 416 6.461 10/25/17 Wed 1510 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 417 21.225 10/25/17 Wed 0943 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 418 9.660 10/25/17 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 419 14.217 10/27/17 Fri 1424 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 420 13.259 10/27/17 Fri 1500 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 421 0.000 10/27/17 Fri 1440 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 422 13.965 10/27/17 Fri 1330 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 423 24.133 10/30/17 Mon 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 424 27.466 10/30/17 Mon 1852 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 425 18.266 10/31/17 Tue 0200 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 426 23.493 10/31/17 Tue 2029 Sideswipe 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 427 29.346 10/31/17 Tue 0625 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 428 9.060 10/31/17 Tue 1220 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 429 12.892 11/01/17 Wed 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 430 9.678 11/01/17 Wed 1214 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 431 20.174 11/02/17 Thu 1615 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 432 13.631 11/02/17 Thu 1605 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 433 4.036 11/03/17 Fri 1740 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 434 18.171 11/04/17 Sat 0630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 435 18.135 11/05/17 Sun 1222 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 436 12.402 11/06/17 Mon 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 437 33.921 11/07/17 Tue 0831 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 438 27.504 11/09/17 Thu 1621 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 439 23.182 11/10/17 Fri 0924 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 440 16.708 11/10/17 Fri 1835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 441 10.177 11/10/17 Fri 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 442 27.530 11/14/17 Tue 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 443 16.162 11/16/17 Thu 0711 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 444 17.671 11/16/17 Thu 2106 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 445 17.763 11/17/17 Fri 0626 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 446 26.876 11/17/17 Fri 1520 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 447 37.756 11/17/17 Fri 0655 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 448 26.908 11/17/17 Fri 1536 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 449 18.126 11/17/17 Fri 1851 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 450 18.899 11/18/17 Sat 1249 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 451 22.204 11/19/17 Sun 2245 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 452 18.775 11/19/17 Sun 1538 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 453 9.696 11/22/17 Wed 1134 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 454 25.728 11/22/17 Wed 1635 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 455 18.899 11/23/17 Thu 1651 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 456 33.921 11/23/17 Thu 0945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Exceed Posted Speed 457 26.684 11/26/17 Sun 0537 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 458 16.496 11/26/17 Sun 1830 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 459 25.383 11/26/17 Sun 1040 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 460 25.421 11/28/17 Tue 1304 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 461 31.118 11/28/17 Tue 1600 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 462 16.683 11/29/17 Wed 1650 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 463 9.064 11/29/17 Wed 1755 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 464 21.225 11/30/17 Thu 0809 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 465 15.197 11/30/17 Thu 1456 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 466 26.852 12/01/17 Fri 1544 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 467 9.027 12/01/17 Fri 1840 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 468 13.257 12/01/17 Fri 2002 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 469 13.554 12/03/17 Sun 1505 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 470 32.131 12/04/17 Mon 1240 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 471 24.350 12/06/17 Wed 0845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 472 12.114 12/06/17 Wed 1528 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Not Coded 473 8.908 12/06/17 Wed 1805 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 474 0.000 12/07/17 Thu 0100 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 475 27.379 12/07/17 Thu 2025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 476 25.899 12/07/17 Thu 1833 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 477 26.150 12/10/17 Sun 1324 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 478 25.915 12/10/17 Sun 1325 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 479 27.504 12/10/17 Sun 1604 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 480 18.899 12/10/17 Sun 2003 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 481 7.236 12/15/17 Fri 0028 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 482 15.467 12/15/17 Fri 1511 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 483 30.219 12/16/17 Sat 2130 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 484 17.571 12/16/17 Sat 1100 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 485 23.182 12/16/17 Sat 0050 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 486 9.729 12/18/17 Mon 1135 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-OFWay 487 32.686 12/19/17 Tue 1738 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 488 12.214 12/20/17 Wed 0632 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 489 34.920 12/20/17 Wed 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 490 14.883 12/20/17 Wed 1839 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 491 16.346 12/21/17 Thu 2020 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 492 26.246 12/21/17 Thu 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 493 16.702 12/21/17 Thu 1409 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 494 1 31.003 12/22/17 1 Fri 1730 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 495 10.554 12/22/17 Fri 0730 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 496 24.827 12/23/17 Sat 1920 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 497 38.634 12/23/17 Sat 0629 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 498 9.687 12/23/17 Sat 1626 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 499 18.831 12/24/17 Sun 0900 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 500 34.734 12/26/17 Tue 1505 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 501 3.378 12/26/17 Tue 0813 Guardrail End 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 502 0.228 12/26/17 Tue 1354 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 503 28.988 12/27/17 Wed 1319 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 504 24.316 12/28/17 Thu 1320 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 505 12.224 12/28/17 Thu 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 506 31.982 12/28/17 Thu 1400 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 507 2.436 12/29/17 Fri 0845 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 508 37.634 12/30/17 Sat 1532 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 509 8.603 12/30/17 Sat 1155 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 510 14.790 12/31/17 Sun 0310 Other Non-Collision 1 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 511 34.256 12/31/17 Sun 1613 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into I Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 511 2 170 339 247 2 98 13 5 38 1 20 9 33 0 13 Percent 0,39% 33,27% 66,34% 48,34% 0,39% 19,18% 2,54% 0,98% 7,44% 0,20% 3,91% 1,75% 6,46% 0,00% 2,54% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 398 113 43 467 245 96 9 5 5 3 0 1 4 35 1 Percent 77.8996 22.11% 1 8.41% 91.3996 1 47.95% 1 18.79% 1 1.76% 1 0.98% 0.98% 0,59% 0.00% 0.20% 0.78% 6.85% 0,20% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,613 SPOT CRASH RATE: 68.160 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 30.049 01/01/18 Mon 0035 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 2 12.268 01/02/18 Tue 1304 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 3 14.618 01/03/18 Wed 1200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 4 18.814 01/05/18 Fri 1250 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 5 32.918 01/07/18 Sun 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 11.107 01/08/18 Mon 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 17.737 01/09/18 Tue 0405 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 8 24.604 01/09/18 Tue 1932 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 1.216 01/11/18 Thu 1424 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 25.772 01/11/18 Thu 1800 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 27.438 01/12/18 Fri 1545 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 12 26.646 01/12/18 Fri 1729 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 13 1 10.454 01/15/18 Mon 1210 1 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 16.204 01/16/18 Tue 1446 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 31.198 01/17/18 Wed 1450 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 16 28.917 01/17/18 Wed 1745 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 17 27.595 01/18/18 Thu 2015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 9.294 01/19/18 Fri 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 25.897 01/19/18 Fri 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 20 32.667 01/19/18 Fri 2200 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 21 24.230 01/20/18 Sat 2205 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 16.716 01/20/18 Sat 1035 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 23 3.915 01/21/18 Sun 1310 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 24 15.278 01/22/18 Mon 1649 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 25 28.260 01/22/18 Mon 2006 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 3.572 01/22/18 Mon 1441 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 16.336 01/23/18 Tue 1754 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 30.090 01/23/18 Tue 1806 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 29 0.716 01/23/18 Tue 0648 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 30 3.336 01/24/18 Wed 0636 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 23.522 01/26/18 Fri 1710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 25.715 01/27/18 Sat 2109 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry I Ran Red Light 33 16.290 01/30/18 Tue 0740 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 34 17.317 01/30/18 Tue 1709 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 35 11.107 01/31/18 Wed 1020 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 36 19.415 02/02/18 Fri 0747 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 16.318 02/02/18 Fri 0907 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 20.335 02/02/18 Fri 1455 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 13.829 02/02/18 Fri 1608 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 40 11.202 02/03/18 Sat 0035 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 41 36.913 02/05/18 Mon 1720 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 42 14.726 02/05/18 Mon 1710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 16.200 02/05/18 Mon 0730 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 33.921 02/05/18 Mon 1802 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 4S 25.195 02/06/18 Tue 1420 Right-Turn 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 46 2.986 02/07/18 Wed 1055 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 47 20.235 02/07/18 Wed 0700 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 48 32.431 02/08/18 Thu 0021 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 49 4.201 02/09/18 Fri 1621 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 50 27.614 02/10/18 Sat 1211 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 51 24.161 02/11/18 Sun 2010 Sideswipe 0 1 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 52 2.206 02/11/18 Sun 1335 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 53 25.743 02/11/18 Sun 1250 Pedestrian 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 54 29.056 02/11/18 Sun 1515 Rear-End 0 8 0 Day Dry I Improper Backing 55 18.487 02/13/18 Tue 1700 Left-Turn 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 56 7.236 02/13/18 Tue 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 57 25.706 02/14/18 Wed 1055 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 58 8.168 02/15/18 Thu 0720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 59 14.827 02/15/18 Thu 1709 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 8.241 02/16/18 Fri 1340 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 61 8.241 02/16/18 Fri 1602 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 62 32.918 02/16/18 Fri 1700 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 63 37.912 02/18/18 Sun 1532 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 25.658 02/19/18 Mon 1313 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 7.899 02/19/18 Man 1301 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 16.261 02/20/18 Tue 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 26.199 02/21/18 Wed 1540 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 12.107 02/22/18 Thu 1155 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 69 27.490 02/22/18 Thu 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 2.705 02/23/18 Fri 0630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 71 14.221 02/23/18 Fri 1747 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 72 10.177 02/24/18 Sat 1703 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 73 10.177 02/24/18 Sat 1742 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 14.705 02/25/18 Sun 1348 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 75 13.252 02/2S/18 Sun 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 17.693 02/26/18 Mon 1532 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 77 15.161 02/28/18 Wed 1439 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 78 17.695 02/28/18 Wed 2000 Angle 0 1 0 Night I Dr I Ran Red Light 79 16.152 02/28/18 Wed 1125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 80 9.378 03/O1/18 Thu 1204 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 81 14.227 03/02/18 Fri 1444 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 82 7.064 03/03/18 Sat 0015 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 83 27.115 03/03/18 Sat 1030 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 25.899 03/03/18 Sat 1154 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 85 16.703 03/04/18 Sun 0230 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 30.090 03/04/18 Sun 1416 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 87 4.201 03/05/18 Mon 1356 Rear-End 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 27.614 03/06/18 Tue 0540 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 89 16.166 03/06/18 Tue 1703 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 90 29.762 03/06/18 Tue 2032 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 91 23.850 03/07/18 Wed 1322 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 92 23.182 03/08/18 Thu 1845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 93 7.691 03/08/18 Thu 1500 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 94 1 36.718 03/09/18 1 Fri 0515 Fence 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 9S 26.674 03/09/18 Fri 1242 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 96 23.682 03/10/18 Sat 0720 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 97 32.522 03/11/18 Sun 0000 Traffic Signal Support 0 0 1 Unknown Other Not Coded 98 33.921 03/11/18 Sun 1115 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 26.010 03/12/18 Mon 0550 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 100 27.523 03/13/18 Tue 1220 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 101 20.235 03/14/18 Wed 1SS7 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 9.065 03/14/18 Wed 1733 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 103 16.166 03/14/18 Wed 2025 Head-On 0 6 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 104 24.082 03/15/18 Thu 2105 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Dry I Improper Turn 105 27.115 03/15/18 Thu 2023 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 106 7.236 03/18/18 Sun 1838 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 107 11.688 03/18/18 Sun 1143 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 108 30.986 03/18/18 Sun 0959 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 109 1 17.279 03/18/18 1 Sun 0916 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 15.326 03/18/18 Sun 1140 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 111 9.160 03/18/18 Sun 1708 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 112 6.747 03/18/18 Sun 1739 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 113 16.345 03/19/18 Mon 1023 Rear-End 0 8 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 12.452 03/20/18 Tue 2255 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 115 13.257 03/20/18 Tue 1536 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 8.645 03/20/18 Tue 1629 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 23.182 03/21/18 Wed 0902 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 118 26.199 03/22/18 Thu 0713 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 119 17.671 03/23/18 Fri 1050 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 120 10.177 03/23/18 Fri 1629 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 121 36.913 03/23/18 Fri 1742 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 10.036 03/23/18 Fri 1625 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 123 29.300 03/23/18 Fri 1520 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 124 0.734 03/24/18 Sat 0715 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 125 16.035 03/25/18 Sun 1533 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 126 34.918 03/25/18 Sun 1905 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 127 31.118 03/26/18 Mon 1931 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 7.736 03/27/18 Tue 1900 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 129 3.517 03/28/18 Wed 16SS Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 10.545 03/28/18 Wed 1110 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 131 34.920 03/30/18 Fri 19SS Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 132 16.936 03/30/18 Fri 0825 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 133 26.001 03/31/18 Sat 1917 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 134 13.854 03/31/18 Sat 1805 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 135 27.134 03/31/18 Sat 0816 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 136 16.702 04/O1/18 Sun 1805 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 137 33.930 04/O1/18 Sun 1808 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 138 17.317 04/02/18 Mon 0926 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 139 12.224 04/02/18 Mon 1429 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 26.199 04/03/18 Tue 1718 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 141 23.850 04/04/18 Wed 1826 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 142 19.897 04/05/18 Thu 1058 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 143 10.912 04/05/18 Thu 2113 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 144 8.036 04/05/18 Thu 1740 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 145 31.118 04/05/18 Thu 0825 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 146 18.583 04/06/18 Fri 1640 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 147 12.984 04/06/18 Fri 1519 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 148 21.420 04/07/18 Sat 1629 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 149 31.013 04/08/18 Sun 0440 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Other Careless or Negligent Manner 150 23.182 04/09/18 Mon 0646 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 151 15.269 04/09/18 Mon 1530 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 152 12.224 04/10/18 Tue 1242 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 153 8.341 04/12/18 Thu 1520 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 154 33.621 04/15/18 Sun 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 155 34.756 04/15/18 Sun 2310 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 156 14.397 04/15/18 Sun 0735 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 1S7 25.003 04/15/18 Sun 1432 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 158 26.099 04/16/18 Mon 1 1053 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 1S9 1 28.108 04/16/18 1 Mon MS Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day I Dry Improper Turn 160 13.257 04/17/18 Tue 1154 Ditch 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 161 13.980 04/18/18 Wed 0715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 162 28.019 04/19/18 Thu 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 163 27.504 04/19/18 Thu 1229 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 164 10.677 04/19/18 Thu 2135 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 165 25.846 04/20/18 Fri 1317 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 166 9.699 04/20/18 Fri 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 167 15.269 04/20/18 Fri 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 168 13.554 04/21/18 Sat 1840 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 169 8.545 04/22/18 Sun 0855 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 170 33.940 04/22/18 Sun 1044 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 171 7.257 04/22/18 Sun 1800 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 172 10.554 04/23/18 Mon 2021 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 173 9.794 04/25/18 Wed 1612 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 174 18.266 04/25/18 Wed 2234 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 175 1 16.141 04/26/18 1 Thu 1140 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 176 34.920 04/26/18 Thu 0747 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 177 18.899 04/26/18 Thu 1735 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 178 14.719 04/27/18 Fri 1426 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 179 8.241 04/29/18 Sun 2225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 180 18.899 04/30/18 Mon 0950 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 181 1.225 04/30/18 Mon 0645 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 182 9.466 OS/O1/18 Tue 1327 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 183 25.349 05/02/18 Wed 0840 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 184 32.152 05/02/18 Wed 0749 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 185 25.281 05/02/18 Wed 1351 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 186 23.998 05/02/18 Wed 1145 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 187 25.216 05/03/18 Thu 0756 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 188 17.699 05/03/18 Thu 1818 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 189 12.995 05/04/18 Fri 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 190 27.343 05/06/18 Sun 1011 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 191 27.343 05/06/18 Sun 1342 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 192 15.161 05/07/18 Mon 1519 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 193 28.019 05/08/18 Tue 1251 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry I Ran Stop Sign 194 32.956 05/11/18 Fri 1230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 195 7.274 05/11/18 Fri 1105 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 196 28.987 05/12/18 Sat 2345 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 197 9.046 05/12/18 Sat 0525 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 198 27.336 05/12/18 Sat 1531 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 199 0.000 05/12/18 Sat 1750 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 200 12.928 05/12/18 Sat 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 201 38.661 05/13/18 Sun 0850 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 202 12.881 05/17/18 Thu 1618 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 203 14.824 05/18/18 Fri 1200 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 204 32.762 05/19/18 Sat 0250 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Wet Swerved Or Avoided 205 28.170 05/21/18 Mon 0640 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 206 0.234 05/22/18 Tue 0110 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 207 14.227 05/22/18 Tue 1857 Not Coded 0 2 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 208 31.989 05/2S/18 Fri 2114 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 209 25.913 05/29/18 Tue 1310 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 210 10.554 OS/31/18 Thu 0838 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 211 25.197 05/31/18 Thu 1046 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 212 31.839 06/O1/18 Fri 0637 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 213 26.682 06/01/18 Fri 1024 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 214 27.867 06/01/18 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 215 25.913 06/01/18 Fri 1115 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 216 14.381 06/02/18 Sat 2200 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 217 38.756 06/02/18 Sat 1436 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 218 14.217 06/03/18 Sun 0935 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 219 7.817 06/03/18 Sun 1101 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 220 8.582 06/03/18 Sun 1420 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 221 16.436 06/04/18 Mon 1740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 222 25.364 06/07/18 Thu 1710 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 223 20.902 06/10/18 Sun 0920 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 224 19.491 06/10/18 Sun 2009 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 225 33.256 06/11/18 Mon 0740 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 226 8.692 06/12/18 Tue 1940 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 227 7.236 06/14/18 Thu 1254 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 228 28.545 06/14/18 Thu 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 229 9.056 06/14/18 Thu 1520 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 230 15.012 06/14/18 Thu 1712 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 231 34.021 06/15/18 Fri 0845 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 232 16.063 06/15/18 Fri 1410 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 233 8.222 06/18/18 Mon 0800 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 234 17.671 06/22/18 Fri 1350 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 235 12.702 06/22/18 Fri 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 236 37.912 06/23/18 Sat 1247 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 237 37.969 06/23/18 Sat 1720 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 238 7.362 06/24/18 Sun 1228 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 239 29.039 06/27/18 Wed 0750 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 240 6.246 06/30/18 Sat 1820 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 241 28.108 07/01/18 Sun 1820 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 242 18.266 07/02/18 Mon 1150 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 243 23.177 07/02/18 Mon 1125 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 244 35.916 07/02/18 Mon 0320 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 245 27.876 07/04/18 Wed 2200 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 246 26.083 07/05/18 Thu 0015 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 247 26.092 07/06/18 Fri 1215 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 248 25.715 07/06/18 Fri 1852 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 249 33.902 07/07/18 Sat 1715 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 250 11.107 07/07/18 Sat 1050 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 251 16.128 07/07/18 Sat 1254 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 252 18.247 07/07/18 Sat 0940 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 253 25.367 07/07/18 Sat 1050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 254 7.823 07/08/18 Sun 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 255 18.766 07/08/18 Sun 1053 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 256 1 9.234 07/08/18 1 Sun 1805 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2S7 10.178 07/08/18 Sun 1925 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 258 7.514 07/08/18 Sun 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 2S9 7.236 07/08/18 Sun 2050 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 260 31.739 07/09/18 Mon 2250 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 261 27.204 07/10/18 Tue 1250 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 262 18.899 07/11/18 Wed 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 263 18.266 07/13/18 Fri 0950 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 264 31.095 07/13/18 Fri 1735 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 265 5.412 07/14/18 Sat 0828 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 266 27.876 07/14/18 Sat 2220 Angle 0 5 0 1 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 267 14.909 07/14/18 Sat 1650 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 268 7.658 07/15/18 Sun 1200 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 269 36.421 07/19/18 Thu 1608 Rear-End 0 7 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 270 29.539 07/19/18 Thu 0851 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 271 1 15.943 07/20/18 1 Fri 1255 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 272 7.295 07/20/18 Fri 2055 Rear-End 0 1 5 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 273 38.618 07/21/18 Sat 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 274 34.256 07/21/18 Sat 1121 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 275 28.600 07/23/18 Mon 1135 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 276 21.206 07/23/18 Mon 1258 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 277 38.623 07/26/18 Thu 0832 Guardrail End 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 278 6.247 07/26/18 Thu 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 279 35.921 07/26/18 Thu 1633 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 280 7.736 07/27/18 Fri 1230 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 281 9.397 07/28/18 Sat 0830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 282 24.161 07/30/18 Mon 1830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 283 2.042 07/31/18 Tue 1725 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 284 21.475 08/01/18 Wed 1205 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 285 29.687 08/02/18 Thu 0915 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 286 36.171 08/03/18 Fri 1737 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 287 33.756 08/03/18 Fri 1031 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 288 33.256 08/04/18 Sat 0728 Not Coded 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 289 27.542 08/04/18 Sat 1217 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 290 16.702 08/04/18 Sat 1500 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 291 29.056 08/04/18 Sat 1409 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Followed too Closely 292 16.351 08/04/18 Sat 0400 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Other Not Coded 293 33.006 08/OS/18 Sun 1302 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 294 0.000 08/07/18 Tue 1310 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 295 9.065 08/07/18 Tue 1250 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 296 25.440 08/09/18 Thu 0715 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 297 26.066 08/09/18 Thu 2100 Not Coded 0 4 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 298 21.292 08/09/18 Thu 1750 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 299 25.374 08/09/18 Thu 2020 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry I Improper Turn 300 9.736 08/10/18 Fri 1425 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 301 17.671 08/10/18 Fri 1658 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 302 17.766 08/10/18 Fri 1940 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 303 3.231 08/11/18 Sat 0000 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 304 23.182 08/12/18 Sun 1430 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 305 37.798 08/12/18 Sun 1130 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Day Wet Ran Off Roadway 306 21.225 08/12/18 Sun 1640 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 307 24.161 08/13/18 Mon 0335 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 308 16.143 08/13/18 Mon 1750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 309 25.197 08/15/18 Wed 1610 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 310 14.877 08/15/18 Wed 1513 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 311 13.257 08/16/18 Thu 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 312 16.336 08/17/18 Fri 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 313 25.899 08/17/18 Fri 1838 Pedestrian 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 314 25.197 08/17/18 Fri 1500 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 315 26.199 08/17/18 Fri 1556 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 316 35.420 08/17/18 Fri 1810 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 317 32.918 08/18/18 Sat 1733 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 318 22.198 08/18/18 Sat 2205 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 319 35.916 08/18/18 Sat 1445 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 320 7.918 08/20/18 Mon 1335 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 321 27.495 08/21/18 Tue 1306 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 322 34.035 08/21/18 Sat 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 323 27.857 08/26/18 Sun 2215 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 324 26.024 08/26/18 Sun 0100 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 325 27.513 08/27/18 Mon 1932 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 326 22.604 08/27/18 Mon 1805 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 327 14.534 08/27/18 Mon 1030 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 328 20.890 08/28/18 Tue 2255 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 329 26.770 08/28/18 Tue 1539 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 330 0.071 09/01/18 Sat 1354 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 331 36.913 09/01/18 Sat 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 332 35.916 09/02/18 Sun 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 333 25.197 09/02/18 Sun 1410 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 334 0.525 09/03/18 Mon 1154 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Ran Stop Sign 335 8.631 09/04/18 Tue 1214 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 336 25.292 09/05/18 Wed 1110 Sideswipe 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 337 1 25.149 09/06/18 1 Thu 1300 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 338 27.508 09/07/18 Fri 1143 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 339 21.233 09/07/18 Fri 1350 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 340 18.890 09/08/18 Sat 2230 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 341 19.977 09/08/18 Sat 1437 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 342 18.899 09/08/18 Sat 2244 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 343 14.227 09/09/18 Sun 2047 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 344 30.253 09/11/18 Tue 0830 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 345 11.108 09/14/18 Fri 1606 Angle 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 346 25.630 09/17/18 Mon 0800 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 347 12.214 09/19/18 Wed 1405 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 348 12.224 09/19/18 Wed 1613 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 349 17.662 09/20/18 Thu 0738 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 350 21.580 09/21/18 Fri 2048 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 351 18.266 09/21/18 Fri 1854 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 352 1 23.730 09/23/18 1 Sun 0005 1 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 353 3.431 09/24/18 Mon 1455 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 354 9.515 09/24/18 Mon 0920 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 355 18.899 09/24/18 Mon 2118 Angle 0 2 0 1 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 356 17.672 09/26/18 Wed 0933 Jackknife 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 357 27.483 09/28/18 Fri 1505 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 358 25.527 09/29/18 Sat 2001 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 359 16.043 10/02/18 Tue 0720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 360 0.000 10/03/18 Wed 1505 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 361 14.881 10/04/18 Thu 1800 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 362 7.616 10/05/18 Fri 1621 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 363 32.089 10/06/18 Sat 0000 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 1 Night Dry 1 Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 364 28.789 10/07/18 Sun 2236 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 365 5.212 10/07/18 Sun 1200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 366 20.951 10/07/18 Sun 1515 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 367 33.921 10/07/18 Sun 2115 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 368 35.136 10/09/18 Tue 0110 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 369 8.211 10/10/18 Wed 1550 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 370 21.765 10/11/18 Thu 0800 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 371 19.149 10/14/18 Sun 0410 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 1 Night I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 372 27.532 10/14/18 Sun 1948 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 373 25.890 10/14/18 Sun 1400 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 374 28.319 10/1S/18 Mon 1042 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 375 0.534 10/17/18 Wed 1656 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 376 2.206 10/18/18 Thu 1710 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 377 26.308 10/18/18 Thu 1005 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 378 18.899 10/18/18 Thu 1600 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 379 8.102 10/20/18 Sat 1320 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 380 25.383 10/22/18 Mon 0919 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 381 18.130 10/22/18 Mon 1107 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 382 28.203 10/22/18 Mon 1300 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 383 8.815 10/22/18 Mon 1950 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 384 25.663 10/24/18 Wed 1442 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 385 12.214 10/24/18 Wed 2136 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 386 7.665 10/26/18 Fri 1315 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day I Dry Improper Turn 387 22.081 10/26/18 Fri 1551 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 388 20.435 10/26/18 Fri 0910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 389 16.740 10/28/18 Sun 0020 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 390 8.241 10/28/18 Sun 1128 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 391 2.206 10/29/18 Mon 1020 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 392 25.899 10/29/18 Mon 1637 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 393 25.271 10/29/18 Mon 1830 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 394 37.912 10/30/18 Tue 2001 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 395 18.602 11/01/18 Thu 1441 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 396 15.269 11/O1/18 Thu 0930 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 397 33.921 11/02/18 Fri 0716 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 398 31.303 11/02/18 Fri 0626 Angle 0 1 0 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 399 25.134 11/02/18 Fri 1640 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 400 10.177 11/02/18 Fri 1103 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 401 18.775 11/05/18 Mon 1 1710 Pedalcycle 0 1 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 402 1 28.988 11/06/18 1 Tue 1222 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 403 24.421 11/06/18 Tue 1215 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 404 25.197 11/06/18 Tue 0908 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 405 12.214 11/06/18 Tue 1415 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day I Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 38.777 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 406 18.826 11/08/18 Thu 1056 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 407 0.516 11/08/18 Thu 1540 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 408 26.161 11/08/18 Thu 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 409 27.315 11/09/18 Fri 1515 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 410 11.600 11/11/18 Sun 0000 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 411 29.434 11/14/18 Wed 1055 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 412 12.883 11/14/18 Wed 1855 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 413 7.935 11/14/18 Wed 1831 Angle 0 2 0 Night I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 414 33.978 11/15/18 Thu 0640 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 415 5.312 11/16/18 Fri 1328 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 416 29.039 11/19/18 Mon 1110 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 417 34.920 11/20/18 Tue 0745 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 418 1 16.699 11/20/18 1 Tue 1128 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 419 25.658 11/21/18 Wed 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 420 36.913 11/22/18 Thu 0628 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 421 26.005 11/22/18 Thu 1040 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 422 15.040 11/24/18 Sat 1035 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 423 15.012 11/2S/18 Sun 1320 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 424 28.358 11/25/18 Sun 1745 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 425 25.197 11/27/18 Tue 1835 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 426 0.502 11/28/18 Wed 1650 Tree(Standing) 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 427 18.263 11/28/18 Wed 1535 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 428 17.058 11/29/18 Thu 1040 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Other Contributing Action 429 29.421 11/30/18 Fri 1054 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 430 37.912 12/01/18 Sat 1115 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 431 16.707 12/07/18 Fri 1215 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 432 14.227 12/07/18 Fri 1546 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 433 31.991 12/08/18 Sat 2145 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 434 16.492 12/09/18 Sun 1035 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 435 15.021 12/10/18 Mon 1435 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 436 18.266 12/10/18 Mon 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Not Coded 437 38.680 12/12/18 Wed 2036 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 438 17.787 12/13/18 Thu 1730 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 439 22.854 12/13/18 Thu 0856 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 440 8.290 12/13/18 Thu 1743 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 441 17.671 12/14/18 Fri 1458 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 442 9.391 12/15/18 Sat 0524 Fence 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 443 17.746 12/16/18 Sun 1132 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 444 1.042 12/17/18 Mon 1120 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44S 14.227 12/18/18 Tue 1455 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 446 15.518 12/19/18 Wed 1122 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 447 13.005 12/19/18 Wed 1545 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 448 21.408 12/20/18 Thu 1005 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 449 26.674 12/20/18 Thu 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 450 28.732 12/21/18 Fri 0850 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 451 9.459 12/21/18 Fri 1220 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 452 9.592 12/21/18 Fri 0935 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 453 12.011 12/22/18 Sat 1708 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 454 16.238 12/23/18 Sun 1030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 455 18.899 12/25/18 Tue 0945 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 456 8.241 12/25/18 Tue 1135 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 457 20.729 12/25/18 Tue 1258 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 458 9.678 12/25/18 Tue 2320 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 459 28.596 12/26/18 Wed 0620 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 460 16.143 12/26/18 Wed 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 461 20.951 12/27/18 Thu 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 462 11.714 12/27/18 Thu 1805 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 463 15.269 12/27/18 Thu 1400 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 464 28.108 12/28/18 Fri 0845 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 465 37.912 12/28/18 Fri 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 466 13.257 12/30/18 Sun 1343 Other Non-Collision 1 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 467 36.968 12/30/18 Sun 1941 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 468 27.343 12/30/18 Sun 0940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 469 20.701 12/31/18 Mon 1230 Angle 0 0 1 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 469 2 193 275 221 1 93 9 3 29 0 14 3 38 0 28 Percent 0.43% 41.15% 58.64% 47.12% 0.21% 19.83% 1.92% 0.64% 6.18% 0.00% 2.99% 0.64% 8.1096 0.00% 5.97% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 369 99 33 433 238 70 13 6 0 5 0 1 8 9 1 Percent 1 78.6891 1 21.11% 1 7.0491 1 92.32% 1 50.7591 1 14.9391 1 2.77% 1 1.2891 1 0.00961 1 1.07% 1 0.00% 1 0.2191 1 1.71% 1 1.92961 0.21% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,613 SPOT CRASH RATE: 68.160 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060001 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 3.105 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.100 01/11/14 Sat 1055 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Backing 2 0.259 01/19/14 Sun 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 0.818 01/21/14 Tue 1620 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 4 0.189 01/31/14 Fri 0940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane S 2.144 03/29/14 Sat 1003 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 6 1.841 04/24/14 Thu 0258 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 2.490 05/13/14 Tue 0705 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 2.490 05/24/14 Sat 1829 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 9 1.892 05/28/14 Wed 1828 Angle 0 1 0 Day I Dry Improper Turn 10 0.559 06/08/14 Sun 2220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 0.328 07/11/14 Fri 1117 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 0.104 07/19/14 Sat 0033 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 1.793 07/28/14 Mon 1632 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 0.720 10/06/14 Mon 0905 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 15 1.836 10/29/14 Wed 1806 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 16 0.447 11/09/14 Sun 0845 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 17 0.767 11/20/14 Thu 1657 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 18 0.635 11/25/14 Tue 1807 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 19 1.581 12/O1/14 Mon 1103 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 20 1.831 12/12/14 Fri 1830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 1.920 12/16/14 Tue 0920 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 22 1 0.009 1 12/31/14 Wed 1155 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Pro er Lane Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 22 0 7 15 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 1 Percent 0.00% 31.82% 68.18% 27.27% 0.00% 27.27% 0.00% 0.00% 27.27% 0.00% 4.55% 0.00% 4.55% 0.00% 4.55% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 16 6 1 21 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Percent 1 72.73% 1 27.27% 1 4.55% 95.45% 1 18.18% 1 4.55% 1 13.64% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 4.55% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,000 SPOT CRASH RATE: 3.767 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060001 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 3.105 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.348 01/01/15 Thu 1356 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 1.556 01/25/15 Sun 1830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 3 1.840 01/27/15 Tue 1340 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 4 0.500 02/O1/15 Sun 1120 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 5 0.578 03/06/15 Fri 1540 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 6 1.859 03/12/15 Thu 1105 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 7 0.569 03/14/15 Sat 1457 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 2.490 04/09/15 Thu 1610 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 9 0.587 04/17/15 Fri 1242 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 1.163 04/30/15 Thu 1730 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 11 1.793 05/15/15 Fri 1310 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 12 2.098 05/20/15 Wed 0800 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 13 0.500 05/25/15 Mon 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 1.289 1 06/15/15 Mon 0840 Left-Turn 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 15 1.651 06/18/15 Thu 1600 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 16 1.581 06/24/15 Wed 1030 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 17 1.841 09/21/15 Mon 0850 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 2.490 09/25/15 Fri 2000 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 19 0.104 10/07/15 Wed 1150 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 20 1.651 10/12/15 Mon 2253 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 21 0.540 10/31/15 Sat 1422 Sideswipe 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 22 0.533 1 11/13/15 Fri 1434 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Disregarded Other Traffic Sign 23 0.259 11/14/15 Sat 1815 Sideswipe 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 0.578 11/15/15 Sun 1730 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 1 Night Wet I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 25 1.631 11/15/15 Sun 0810 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 0.327 11/21/15 Sat 0745 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 27 1.840 12/17/15 Thu 1715 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 0.233 12/24/15 Thu 1615 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 29 1.849 12/24/15 Thu 0730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner 30 1.142 12/21/15 Fri 1540 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 30 0 10 20 5 0 11 1 0 7 0 2 0 3 0 0 Percent 0.00% 33.33% 66.67% 16.67% 0.00% 36.67% 3.33% 0.00% 23.33% 0.00% 6.67% 0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.00% CDntrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 25 5 4 26 3 7 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Percent 1 83.33% 1 16.67% 13.33% 1 86.67% 1 10.00% 1 23.33% 1 6.67% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 3.33% 1 3.33% 1 0.00% 1 3.33% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,500 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.088 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060001 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 3.105 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2016 TO 12/2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.000 01/02/16 Sat 0855 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 0.604 04/17/16 Sun 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 3 1.540 05/24/16 Tue 0825 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 1.540 05/26/16 Thu 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 1.231 06/07/16 Tue 0915 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 6 2.490 06/30/16 Thu 0810 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 2.219 07/13/16 Wed 1205 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 8 0.354 07/22/16 Fri 1717 Angle 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 9 1.407 08/29/16 Mon 1700 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 10 1.590 09/17/16 Sat 1435 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 1.802 10/13/16 Thu 0845 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 12 2.098 10/16/16 Sun 2051 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 13 0.597 11/07/16 Mon 1738 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 1.840 11/21/16 Mon 1626 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 15 1.878 12/20/16 Tue 0940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Inur PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 15 1 6 9 4 0 6 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 Percent 6.67% 40.00% 60.00% 26.67% 0.00% 40.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.33% 0.00% 6.67% 0.00% 6.67% 0.00% 6.67% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 13 2 2 13 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Percent 1 86.67% 1 13.33% 13.3391 1 86.6791 1 33.33% 1 26.67% 26.671 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 13.3391 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,500 SPOT CRASH RATE: 2.491 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060001 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 3.105 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 1.783 01/17/17 Tue 1152 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 2 1.231 01/30/17 Mon 1546 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 3 1.840 02/09/17 Thu 1125 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 1.840 02/15/17 Wed 1100 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 5 1.325 03/02/17 Thu 1420 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 6 1.812 03/17/17 Fri 1339 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 0.569 03/31/17 Fri 0825 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 8 2.190 04/08/17 Sat 1351 Angle 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 9 1.840 04/26/17 Wed 1350 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 0.803 05/08/17 Mon 1434 Mailbox 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 11 0.478 05/09/17 Tue 1255 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 12 0.725 05/11/17 Thu 1135 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 13 1.887 06/08/17 Thu 1408 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 1.116 06/24/17 Sat 1122 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 1.859 06/28/17 Wed 1149 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 1.821 07/24/17 Mon 1503 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 17 1.868 07/30/17 Sun 1230 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 0.300 08/19/17 Sat 1648 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 19 0.576 09/22/17 Fri 1440 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 20 2.990 10/27/17 Fri 0450 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dr Careless or Negligent Manner 21 0.378 11/29/17 Wed 2002 Rear-End 0 3 1 0 Ni ht Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 0.354 12/09/17 Sat 2200 Angle 0 0 1 Ni ht Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal In'ur PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 22 2 7 14 4 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 Percent 9.09% 31.82% 63.64% 18.18% 0.00% 45.45% 0.00% 0.00% 18.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.09% 0.00% 4.55% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 19 3 1 21 4 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Percent 1 86.36% 1 13.64% 1 4.5591 1 95.45% 1 18.18% 1 40.91% I 13.64% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.0096 1 13.64L_L 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,500 SPOT CRASH RATE: 2.491 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060001 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 3.105 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.490 01/12/18 Fri 1635 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 2 0.483 01/20/18 Sat 1540 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 0.616 01/31/18 Wed 2122 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 4 1.544 02/11/18 Sun 2030 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 5 1.544 02/12/18 Mon 1512 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 6 1.631 03/02/18 Fri 0535 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 7 0.644 03/22/18 Thu 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 1.854 03/23/18 Fri 1411 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 1.590 03/29/18 Thu 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 2.490 04/05/18 Thu 1747 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 1.590 05/06/18 Sun 0100 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 12 0.538 05/19/18 Sat 1711 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 13 0.009 05/31/18 Thu 2138 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 2.376 06/25/18 Mon 0940 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 1.340 07/OS/18 Thu 1615 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 1.849 08/24/18 Fri 0909 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 17 0.572 09/07/18 Fri 0650 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 18 1.559 10/04/18 Thu 0919 Embankment 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 19 1.452 11/19/18 Mon 0900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 1.840 11/20/18 Tue 0845 Not Coded 0 0 1 Da Dr Improper Turn 21 1.840 11/2'.18 Wed 2220 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 22 2.490 12/07/18 Fri 1429 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal In'ur PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 22 0 6 16 10 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 1 Percent 0.00% 27.27% 72.73% 45.45% 0.00% 9.09% 0.00% 0.00% 27.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.64% 0.00% 4.55% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 15 7 5 17 12 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Percent 1 68.18% 1 31.82% 1 22.7391 1 77.27% 1 54.55% 1 9.09% I 13.64% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.0091 1 4.55% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,500 SPOT CRASH RATE: 2.491 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060002 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 0.772 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 0.636 08/06/14 Wed 1025 Angle 0 2 0 Da Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 0.617 09/10/14 Wed 1055 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 2 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 3 0.289 11/05/14 Wed 0452 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 3 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Percent 0.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 33.33% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 1 66.67% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 66.67% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.02L6_J_0.00961_J 0.0096 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 15,000 SPOT CRASH RATE: 0.548 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060002 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 0.772 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 0.742 01/24/15 Sat 0223 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 2 0.674 04/04/15 Sat 1330 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 0.400 04/09/15 Thu 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 0.289 07/25/15 Sat 1749 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 5 0.685 09/06/15 Sun 0805 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 5 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent 20.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 0.00% 40.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 4 1 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Percent 1 80.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 80.00% 1 40.00% 1 40.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 20.00% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,000 IF-SPOT CRASH RATE: 0.856 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060002 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 0.772 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2016 TO 12/2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE(VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.052 09/16/16 Fri 1715 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100,00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 1 100.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 15,000 SPOT CRASH RATE: 0.183 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060002 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 0.772 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2017 TO 12/2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE(VEHICLE ONLY) 1 1 0.655 1 04/03/17 Mon 1245 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 1 Day I Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100,00% 0.00% 0.00% 100,00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 1 100.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 1 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 15,000 SPOT CRASH RATE: 0.183 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90060002 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 0.772 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.712 02/12/18 Mon 2200 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 2 0.052 03/29/18 Thu 0447 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 3 0.655 10/11/18 Thu 1340 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 0.693 11/17/18 Sat 0640 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 2 2 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 1--50--00-%7 50.00% I 0.00% 100.00% 1 50.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 15,000 SPOT CRASH RATE: 0.183 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90050000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 14.072 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 12.383 12/14/14 Sun 1200 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 2 0.056 12/23/14 Tue 1345 Traffic Signal Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 12.383 07/18/14 Fri 1510 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 7.778 08/17/14 Sun 1422 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action S 12.883 05/26/14 Mon 1307 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 10.247 06/O1/14 Sun 0235 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 2.993 07/31/14 Thu 1215 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 8 1.383 10/25/14 Sat 1206 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 9 7.222 06/03/14 Tue 1455 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 10 10.311 01/22/14 Wed 0703 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 11 2.387 01/31/14 Fri 0213 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 12 2.387 03/11/14 Tue 1018 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 1.359 04/14/14 Mon 1155 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 13.245 1 04/19/14 Sat 1 0253 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 15 13.336 05/18/14 Sun 0945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 5.887 08/03/14 Sun 1720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 10.055 09/07/14 Sun 1933 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Ni ht Dry Ran Off Roadway 18 0.101 11/14/14 Fri 1905 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 19 8.603 01/19/14 Sun 1500 Head-On 0 2 0 Day Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 20 13.245 04/08/14 Tue 1212 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 21 4.182 06/21/14 Sat 1200 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 8.305 1 08/03/14 Sun 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.094 05/08/14 Thu 1319 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 11.321 08/01/14 Fri 1433 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2S 8.698 10/06/14 Mon 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 26 12.006 02/09/14 Sun 1215 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 27 13.355 02/23/14 Sun 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 10.498 08/21/14 Thu 0625 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 29 3.682 11/29/14 Sat 1158 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 30 7.698 1 05/26/14 Mon 1710 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 12.848 07/04/14 Fri 1040 Rear-End 0 3 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 9.698 08/31/14 Sun 0835 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 12.503 12/24/14 Wed 1236 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Improper Turn 34 8.195 11/24/14 Mon 2110 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 35 2.387 07/08/14 Tue 1547 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way P336 9.698 07/11/14 Fri 1711 Not Coded 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 11.198 12/08/14 Mon 1303 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 37 1 16 20 17 1 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 0 2 Percent 2.70% 43.24% 54.05% 45.95% 2.70% 18.92% 0.00% 0.00% 2.70% 0.00% 2.70% 0.00% 16.22% 0.00% 5.43% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 28 9 3 34 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 Percent 1 75.68% 1 24.32% 1 8.11% 1 91.89% 1 45.95% 1 8.11% 1 2.70% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 5.41% 1 8.11% 2.70% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 11,200 SPOT CRASH RATE: 9.051 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90050000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 14.072 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 8.437 01/13/15 Tue 1120 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 0.713 03/12/15 Thu 1830 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 3 13.944 02/27/15 Fri 1206 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 6.265 05/15/15 Fri 1235 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 5 12.063 05/16/15 Sat 1255 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 6 1.387 06/27/15 Sat 2323 Angle 0 4 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7 3.504 07/0S/15 Sun 0902 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 6.182 08/18/15 Tue 1005 Right-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Not Coded 9 10.247 03/30/15 Mon 0256 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 10 1.387 04/12/15 Sun 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 5.725 04/05/15 Sun 1525 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 12 10.198 07/13/15 Mon 2230 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 13 13.745 07/09/15 Thu 2106 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 14 8.514 1 07/09/15 Thu 2118 Tree(Standing) 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 15 1.364 05/25/15 Mon 1456 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 10.247 05/25/15 Mon 1828 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 1.364 06/06/15 Sat 1801 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 10.247 11/08/15 Sun 0536 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 19 11.321 08/23/15 Sun 1728 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 1.387 03/31/15 Tue 1224 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 13.245 0S/2S/15 Mon 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 13.599 1 08/06/15 Thu 1128 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 13.393 07/12/15 Sun 1258 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 3.182 12/13/15 Sun 1801 Angle 0 0 1 1 Night I Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 4.182 09/26/15 Sat 0120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Ni ht Dry Not Coded 26 7.182 12/31/15 Thu 0754 Embankment 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 27 11.305 07/06/15 Mon 1250 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 1.387 11/02/15 Mon 1722 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 28 0 11 17 13 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 Percent 0.00% 39.29% 60.71% 46.43% 0.00% 17.86% 0.00% 3.57% 3.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.29% 0.00% 3.57% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 21 7 0 28 13 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Percent 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 100.00% 46.43% 10.71% 7.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.57% 3.57% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 11,600 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.613 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90050000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 14.072 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2016 TO 12/2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 9.805 07/29/16 Fri 1020 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 2.016 01/27/16 Wed 1445 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 3 7.929 04/08/16 Fri 0749 Ran into Water/Canal 0 0 1 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 4 6.698 06/26/16 Sun 1231 Embankment 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 5 9.865 10/06/16 Thu 0730 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 6 5.574 02/25/16 Thu 1020 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 13.245 03/20/16 Sun 1127 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 11.321 10/08/16 Sat 1530 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 9 8.410 07/08/16 Fri 2024 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 13.245 07/10/16 Sun 1356 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 8.204 07/12/16 Tue 1429 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 8.443 06/13/16 Mon 2140 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 13 8.386 08/16/16 Tue 1928 Angle 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 1.387 09/07/16 Wed 1833 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 12.231 OS/21/16 Sat 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 8.438 09/19/16 Mon 12SO Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 6.365 12/19/16 Mon 1805 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 3.182 10/02/16 Sun 0615 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 19 8.207 11/18/16 Fri 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 19 0 4 15 8 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 Percent 0.00% 21.05% 78.95% 42.11% 0.00% 15.79% 5.26% 0.00% 5.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15.79% 5.26% 5.26% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 14 5 2 17 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 73.687 26.32% 1 10.539/6 89.47% 1 57.89% 1 10.53% 1 0.00% I 0.00% I 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.009/ 1 0.009/ 1 0.00% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,300 SPOT CRASH RATE: 3.914 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90050000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 14.072 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 5.422 03/26/17 Sun 2152 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 2 0.318 08/22/17 Tue 1735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 3 11.321 01/23/17 Mon 1202 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 13.245 11/17/17 Fri 2335 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner S 3.339 02/12/17 Sun 1905 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 6 1.887 09/04/17 Mon 1246 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 10.210 03/26/17 Sun 1910 Not Coded 0 3 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 8 8.445 02/16/17 Thu 1655 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 14.072 03/12/17 Sun 1423 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 10 1.387 02/16/17 Thu 1321 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 8.424 03/10/17 Fri 1130 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 12.006 07/19/17 Wed 0857 Head-On 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 11.321 08/10/17 Thu 1306 Fence 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 14 10.605 07/17/17 Mon 0600 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 8.446 09/05/17 Tue 1542 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 4.682 12/14/17 Thu 1317 Not Coded 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 17 4.438 09/03/17 Sun 1652 Not Coded 0 5 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 18 12.114 11/16/17 Thu 0755 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 19 1.387 08/10/17 Thu 1648 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 20 1.364 05/07/17 Sun 1426 Not Coded 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 21 8.207 01/13/17 Fri 1500 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 0.056 09/18/17 Mon 0630 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 23 8.207 05/24/17 Wed 1755 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 12.383 10/02/17 Mon 0857 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 25 8.207 11/22/17 Wed 1440 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 26 1.364 11/29/17 Wed 1223 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 8.535 08/16/17 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 10.286 12/18/17 Mon 1712 Rear-End 1 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 8.717 12/22/17 Fri 1715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Da Dr No Contributing Action 30 8.207 12/20/17 Wed 1235 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Da Dr No Contributing Action 31 8.689 12/27/17 Wed 1610 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 31 1 13 18 12 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 6 Percent 3.23% 41.94% 58.06% 38.71% 3.23% 9.68% 0.00% 0.00% 9.68% 0.00% 0.00% 3.23% 6.45% 0.00% 19.35% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 26 5 0 31 11 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 3 0 Percent I__83_,_87_V7 16.13% 1 0.00% 100.00% 1 35.48% 1 9.68% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 3.23% 1 12.90% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 3.23% 1 9.68% 1 0.00% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,300 SPOT CRASH RATE: 3.914 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90050000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 14.072 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 1.137 01/08/18 Mon 2245 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 11.305 02/13/18 Tue 0235 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 3 9.698 01/14/18 Sun 1736 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 4 1.887 02/01/18 Thu 1132 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action S 8.176 03/OS/18 Mon 1307 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 10.247 OS/04/18 Fri 0340 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 5.682 OS/16/18 Wed 1300 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 8 1.487 07/30/18 Mon 07SO Rear-End 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 1.487 07/30/18 Mon 0750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 7.740 03/11/18 Sun 0755 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Exceed Posted Speed 11 10.805 01/11/18 Thu 0907 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 12 1.387 09/02/18 Sun 0352 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 10.365 01/05/18 Fri 0138 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 1.387 09/19/18 Wed 1152 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 8.454 03/13/18 Tue 2203 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 12.114 12/12/18 Wed 2148 Head-On 0 1 0 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 17 13.245 04/15/18 Sun 2047 Ditch 0 2 0 Night Wet Swerved Or Avoided 18 8.460 06/21/18 Thu 1506 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 8.384 11/O5/18 Mon 1733 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 1.387 11/26/18 Mon 0920 Angle 0 5 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 21 8.346 06/19/18 Tue 1650 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 1.576 10/09/18 Tue 1139 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 23 8.207 12/09/18 Sun 0841 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 13.245 10/OS/18 Fri 1635 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 1.391 05/O5/18 Sat 2140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 26 2.272 02/03/18 Sat 1300 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Other No Contributing Action 27 1.387 04/05/18 Thu 0920 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 12.006 06/24/18 Sun 1410 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 29 10.247 07/27/18 Fri 1415 Rear-End 0 0 1 Da Dr Followed too Closely 30 2.272 09/20/18 Thu 1220 Tree Standin 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passin Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 30 0 17 13 10 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 Percent 0.00% 56.67% 43.33% 33.33% 3.33% 13.33% 3.33% 3.33% 3.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% 3.33% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 20 10 1 28 10 5 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 Percent 1 66.67% 1 33.33% 1 3.331 1 93.33% 1 33.33% 1 16.67% I 0.00% 0.0096 1 3.3391 1 3.33% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.009/ 1 6.6791 1 3.33% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,300 SPOT CRASH RATE: 3.914 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 5.890 05/04/14 Sun 1005 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 1.750 08/07/14 Thu 1306 Right-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 4.730 09/22/14 Mon 1338 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 4 2.767 10/29/14 Wed 1435 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 5 0.245 12/26/14 Fri 2104 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 6 4.580 06/09/14 Mon 0050 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 9.969 11/08/14 Sat 1825 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 8 4.562 02/01/14 Sat 2141 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 9 3.705 08/11/14 Mon 2315 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 10 6.140 02/20/14 Thu 0430 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 9.886 06/10/14 Tue 1320 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 1.038 03/15/14 Sat 0550 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 1.832 03/20/14 Thu 1158 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 1.796 1 01/12/14 Sun 1 1416 Curb 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 15 1.516 02/13/14 Thu 1430 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 6.140 05/17/14 Sat 1435 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry Ran Red Light 17 11.533 06/14/14 Sat 1905 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 4.495 10/28/14 Tue 1430 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 2.346 01/20/14 Mon 1833 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 20 2.869 08/13/14 Wed 1410 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 21 0.123 11/30/14 Sun 1158 1 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 22 9.087 1 12/09/14 Tue 1422 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 23 1.777 04/17/14 Thu 1425 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 2.014 06/24/14 Tue 1133 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 25 4.463 07/29/14 Tue 1015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 26 1.497 08/08/14 Fri 1245 Railway Vehicle(Train,Engine) 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 27 5.564 08/08/14 Fri 1003 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 6.140 10/06/14 Mon 1245 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 1.928 10/25/14 Sat 0020 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 2.174 1 03/28/14 Fri 1230 Angle 0 1 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 6.114 04/11/14 Fri 1700 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 32 0.772 09/16/14 Tue 1520 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry I Swerved Or Avoided 33 4.959 11/03/14 Mon 1355 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 34 6.140 12/07/14 Sun 1143 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 35 1.274 01/01/14 Wed 0040 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 36 4.270 03/18/14 Tue 2351 Curb 0 0 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 37 9.662 06/03/14 Tue 0512 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 38 0.254 1 03/03/14 Mon 1053 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 39 4.495 05/20/14 Tue 1006 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 8.546 05/27/14 Tue 0845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 4.495 05/28/14 Wed 1218 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 42 0.240 08/06/14 Wed 1218 Head-On 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 0.269 08/20/14 Wed 1 1145 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 2.441 09/22/14 Mon 0757 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 45 5.258 11/03/14 Mon 0942 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 2.015 1 03/08/14 Sat 0055 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 1 0 Night I Dry Not Coded 47 1.492 01/08/14 Wed 1200 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 8.240 02/15/14 Sat 1225 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 49 6.140 04/13/14 Sun 0935 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way SO 2.014 04/18/14 Fri 1215 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 1.928 06/14/14 Sat 1 0800 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 52 0.772 07/08/14 Tue 0900 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 3.622 07/21/14 Mon 1203 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 9.087 1 01/07/14 Tue 1843 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 1 1 Night Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 55 5.663 03/09/14 Sun 0935 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 4.580 03/23/14 Sun 1010 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 57 6.127 06/22/14 Sun 1335 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 58 2.888 02/05/14 Wed 1440 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 59 2.014 02/28/14 Fri 1755 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 60 2.928 03/07/14 Fri 1715 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 61 2.581 04/11/14 Fri 1600 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 62 4.959 04/17/14 Thu 1745 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 63 9.143 04/22/14 Tue 2210 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 64 8.413 04/27/14 Sun 0400 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 65 5.583 07/06/14 Sun 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 8.183 07/30/14 Wed 2050 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 67 5.621 07/31/14 Thu 2050 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 4.434 09/19/14 Fri 1615 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Exceed Posted Speed 69 2.584 09/24/14 Wed 1340 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 70 2.561 10/04/14 Sat 2025 Left-Turn 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 71 0.328 10/17/14 Fri 1440 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 72 8.697 11/03/14 Mon 1940 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 73 9.652 03/07/14 Fri 2230 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 74 2.869 03/19/14 Wed 1728 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7S 3.045 04/OS/14 Sat 1950 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 2.014 04/07/14 Mon 1657 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 77 3.760 OS/06/14 Tue 1448 Rear-End 0 3 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 2.010 07/13/14 Sun 1407 Sideswipe 1 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 5.740 08/07/14 Thu 0933 Curb 0 0 1 Da Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 80 2.441 09/07/14 Sun 0101 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Wet Other Contributing Action 81 3.391 01/18/14 Sat 1100 Angle 0 1 0 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 82 5.659 01/24/14 Fri 1215 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 83 2.926 02/28/14 Fri 1945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 3.890 04/23/14 Wed 0825 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 2.869 04/23/14 Wed 1701 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 86 2.928 05/18/14 Sun 1250 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 87 2.392 06/27/14 Fri 0923 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 2.869 07/14/14 Mon 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 2.928 07/15/14 Tue 0820 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 90 2.928 07/15/14 Tue 1038 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 91 5.773 08/23/14 Sat 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 92 2.762 08/24/14 Sun 0951 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 93 3.388 08/30/14 Sat 0917 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 94 1 0.473 09/09/14 1 Tue 1219 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9S 0.810 09/13/14 Sat 2315 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 96 9.143 11/12/14 Wed 1132 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 97 4.959 12/29/14 Mon 1245 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 98 2.928 03/06/14 Thu 1527 Angle 0 2 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 99 2.763 OS/07/14 Wed 1359 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 100 2.918 06/30/14 Mon 2310 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 101 3.462 07/31/14 Thu 1609 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 5.432 08/12/14 Tue 1618 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 103 10.050 08/24/14 Sun 1500 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 104 2.090 11/17/14 Mon 2124 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 105 3.391 01/13/14 Mon 1230 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 106 1.924 01/30/14 Thu 1035 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 107 4.463 02/01/14 Sat 1005 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 108 3.082 02/21/14 Fri 0830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 109 1.813 03/07/14 Fri 1209 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 0.136 03/10/14 Mon 0755 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 111 2.014 03/17/14 Mon 1300 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 6.165 03/18/14 Tue 0908 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Wet I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 113 4.827 03/21/14 Fri 1133 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 6.140 05/08/14 Thu 1246 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 115 2.109 05/24/14 Sat 0754 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 1.514 06/24/14 Tue 1155 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 117 4.465 06/25/14 Wed 1717 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 118 2.869 06/26/14 Thu 1714 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 119 2.375 06/27/14 Fri 0856 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 120 1.626 07/29/14 Tue 0446 Traffic Sign Support 0 3 1 0 Night I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 121 3.281 08/21/14 Thu 0948 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 122 1.400 11/04/14 Tue 0700 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 123 5.661 11/09/14 Sun 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 124 1.038 11/13/14 Thu 0647 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 125 6.241 11/20/14 Thu 0704 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 126 0.913 11/23/14 Sun 1151 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 127 2.014 12/OS/14 Fri 1344 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 128 2.009 12/09/14 Tue 1133 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 129 5.678 10/29/14 Wed 1623 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 5.417 11/08/14 Sat 1639 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 131 1 10.035 11/23/14 1 Sun 1743 1 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 132 1.702 12/08/14 Mon 1714 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 133 4.627 05/24/14 Sat 1725 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 134 0.485 12/24/14 Wed 1020 Ditch 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 135 6.165 05/22/14 Thu 1720 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry I Improper Turn 136 5.816 07/04/14 Fri 1731 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 137 1.928 12/03/14 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 138 2.683 12/23/14 Tue 1830 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 139 0.942 11/25/14 Tue 0947 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 5.691 12/01/14 Mon 1127 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 141 1.038 12/15/14 Mon 0952 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 142 5.725 12/15/14 Mon 1125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 143 1.909 12/24/14 Wed 1336 Angle 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 Day I Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 144 0.334 12/29/14 Mon 1154 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 145 2.561 05/24/14 Sat 1850 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 146 1.941 12/06/14 Sat 1153 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded Backed Fixed Raninto Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car object Water Other 146 1 49 96 39 1 44 5 3 17 0 8 1 19 0 5 Percent 0.68% 33.56% 65.75% 26.71% 0.68% 30.14% 3.42% 2.05% 11.64% 0.00% 5.48% 0.68% 13.01% 0.00% 3.42% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 116 30 11 135 58 36 5 5 2 3 0 2 0 7 0 Percent 1 79.45% 1 20.55% 1 7.53% 1 92.47% 1 39.73% 1 24.66% 1 3.42% 1 3.42% 1 1.37% 1 2.05% 1 0.00% 1 1.37% 1 0.00% 1 4.79% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 23,341 SPOT CRASH RATE: 17.137 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.071 07/30/15 Thu 0809 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 0.783 08/12/15 Wed 0959 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 2.014 09/17/15 Thu 0728 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 1.928 07/26/15 Sun 1330 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 5 2.014 03/26/15 Thu 2325 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 6 1.937 08/23/15 Sun 2330 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 7 0.791 06/04/15 Thu 0830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 3.344 01/13/15 Tue 1428 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 9 5.300 02/25/15 Wed 1335 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 1.709 04/25/15 Sat 2200 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 8.099 10/30/15 Fri 0523 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 12 6.140 02/07/15 Sat 1054 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 0.772 01/05/15 Mon 1313 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 1.928 01/12/15 Mon 1240 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 3.705 01/07/15 Wed 1143 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 0.089 01/16/15 Fri 1839 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 17 4.734 01/23/15 Fri 0835 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 0.427 01/29/15 Thu 1206 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 19 1.928 08/14/15 Fri 1312 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 20 2.930 02/04/15 Wed 1933 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 21 2.014 03/13/15 Fri 1355 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 1.928 03/15/15 Sun 0900 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 23 4.968 03/17/15 Tue 1957 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 3.622 04/16/15 Thu 1710 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 0.216 04/25/15 Sat 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 2.033 01/14/15 Wed 1807 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 27 4.387 01/20/15 Tue 1611 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 4.514 01/22/15 Thu 1427 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 29 4.693 01/29/15 Thu 1702 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 30 2.561 02/09/15 Mon 1631 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 2.014 02/18/15 Wed 1709 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 32 4.387 01/14/15 Wed 1600 Curb 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 3.142 01/18/15 Sun 2150 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 34 1.928 01/29/15 Thu 1830 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 35 4.234 02/21/15 Sat 1840 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 36 1.142 02/22/15 Sun 1905 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 37 1.265 02/27/15 Fri 1610 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 38 2.014 03/08/15 Sun 1933 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 39 1.928 03/28/15 Sat 2125 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 2.897 08/06/15 Thu 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 41 2.354 03/11/15 Wed 1340 Angle 0 5 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 42 2.432 03/30/15 Mon 1122 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 1.786 02/13/15 Fri 1133 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 2.985 03/03/15 Tue 0857 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 45 2.320 04/02/15 Thu 1000 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 46 0.401 04/06/15 Mon 1045 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 2.014 05/01/15 Fri 0950 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 10.230 05/27/15 Wed 0559 Backed Into 0 2 0 Night Dry Improper Backing 49 0.282 02/13/15 Fri 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 50 0.800 03/04/15 Wed 1341 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 51 7.140 03/06/15 Fri 1304 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 9.910 03/16/15 Mon 0904 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 53 4.799 04/18/15 Sat 0152 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 2.001 05/05/15 Tue 0744 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 55 0.848 08/17/15 Mon 1120 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 56 0.235 02/02/15 Mon 1205 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 57 11.139 02/23/15 Mon 0925 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 58 3.142 05/29/15 Fri 0714 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 4.495 01/02/15 Fri 1814 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 60 0.772 07/16/15 Thu 1636 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 61 10.120 07/27/15 Mon 1707 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 62 2.042 08/14/15 Fri 1908 Rear-End 0 1 10 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 63 3.890 02/02/15 Mon 2305 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 64 6.121 05/02/15 Sat 0630 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 0.249 07/24/15 Fri 2325 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 5.409 11/12/15 Thu 0955 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 4.959 06/04/15 Thu 1640 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 68 8.508 07/11/15 Sat 1845 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 69 3.705 08/05/15 Wed 1728 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 70 9.508 10/13/15 Tue 1550 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 71 1.928 05/30/15 Sat 2049 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 72 5.955 06/02/15 Tue 1453 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 73 11.249 06/07/15 Sun 1532 Head-On 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 74 0.913 06/15/15 Mon 2001 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 75 2.869 06/29/15 Mon 1458 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 76 4.959 07/06/15 Mon 1357 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 77 6.140 07/06/15 Mon 1749 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 0.957 08/18/15 Tue 1518 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 5.650 08/27/15 Thu 1432 Rear-End 1 5 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 11.033 09/11/15 Fri 2012 Ditch 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 81 2.937 09/14/15 Mon 1456 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 82 2.869 10/06/15 Tue 1726 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 83 2.441 10/14/15 Wed 1557 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 84 5.661 11/07/15 Sat 1214 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 4.580 12/08/15 Tue 1429 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 86 9.143 05/07/15 Thu 1700 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 2.692 05/19/15 Tue 1905 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 88 1.010 06/14/15 Sun 2055 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 2.351 06/25/15 Thu 1445 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 90 4.571 07/24/15 Fri 1550 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 91 1.530 07/25/15 Sat 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 92 5.702 08/02/15 Sun 1400 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 93 5.659 08/09/15 Sun 1420 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 94 2.394 08/21/15 Fri 2100 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 95 0.345 08/25/15 Tue 1605 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 96 2.014 09/06/15 Sun 1950 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 97 4.725 09/23/15 Wed 0135 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 98 4.739 09/25/15 Fri 2045 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 3.622 10/03/15 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 100 4.463 11/08/15 Sun 1825 Left-Turn 0 1 2 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 101 3.758 11/14/15 Sat 1815 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 102 0.974 11/16/15 Mon 1650 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 103 3.391 11/30/15 Mon 1645 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 104 1.928 12/24/15 Thu 1605 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 105 11.226 12/30/15 Wed 1720 Mailbox 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 106 4.463 12/30/15 Wed 0415 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 2.928 04/25/15 Sat 1400 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 108 5.277 02/24/15 Tue 1110 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 0.662 05/22/15 Fri 1218 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 4.106 07/03/15 Fri 1244 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 111 0.913 07/13/15 Mon 1647 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 112 6.140 10/31/15 Sat 1705 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 113 4.959 08/14/15 Fri 1502 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 114 2.301 11/12/15 Thu 1138 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 115 4.959 11/09/15 Mon 1310 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 2.014 11/13/15 Fri 1310 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 4.959 12/30/15 Wed 1340 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 118 5.241 09/08/15 Tue 1738 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 119 5.662 11/03/15 Tue 1730 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 0.051 12/18/15 Fri 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 121 4.469 06/30/15 Tue 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 2.016 07/14/15 Tue 0834 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 123 2.346 07/16/15 Thu 1142 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 124 2.128 08/24/15 Mon 1213 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 125 6.140 08/27/15 Thu 0954 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 126 3.705 09/21/15 Mon 1125 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 127 3.758 10/05/15 Mon 1550 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 128 0.913 11/05/15 Thu 0845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 129 4.627 11/14/15 Sat 0935 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 5.659 10/27/15 Tue 2055 Left-Turn 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 131 4.587 11/25/15 Wed 1930 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 131 2 50 80 31 1 44 11 3 9 1 8 0 14 0 3 Percent 1.53% 38.17% 61.07% 23.65% 0.76% 33.59% 8.40% 2.29% 6.87% 0.76% 6.11% 0.00% 10.69% 0.00% 2.29% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 98 33 7 124 48 45 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 Percent 1 74.81% 1 25.19% 1 5.34% 1 94.66% 1 36.64% 1 34.35% 1 3.05% 1 3.05% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 3.82% 1 0.76% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 20,272 SPOT CRASH RATE: 17.704 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.014 03/23/16 Wed 1410 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 2 11.024 01/25/16 Mon 1838 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 3.705 01/05/16 Tue 1145 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 4 2.869 01/19/16 Tue 1510 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action S 4.622 03/28/16 Mon 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 2.928 01/14/16 Thu 2350 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 7 0.692 02/16/16 Tue 0008 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 8 0.000 08/04/16 Thu 1100 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 0.427 08/04/16 Thu 1335 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 0.000 08/31/16 Wed 1619 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 11 2.928 09/28/16 Wed 1610 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 4.932 10/OS/16 Wed 1517 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 13 0.455 05/16/16 Mon 1010 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 3.344 05/26/16 Thu 1510 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 10.050 06/01/16 Wed 0832 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 4.959 06/13/16 Mon 1258 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 17 5.268 07/11/16 Mon 1300 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 2.014 10/02/16 Sun 1420 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 19 0.228 06/17/16 Fri 0004 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 20 0.957 01/06/16 Wed 1910 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 21 4.827 06/08/16 Wed 1330 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Not Coded 22 10.050 06/29/16 Wed 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 2.014 01/06/16 Wed 0727 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 24 0.908 02/10/16 Wed 1027 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 0.758 03/01/16 Tue 1012 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 5.277 04/11/16 Mon 2000 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 3.576 03/09/16 Wed 0830 Fell/jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 28 4.932 01/O1/16 Fri 1814 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 29 2.014 01/12/16 Tue 1620 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 4.571 01/13/16 Wed 1645 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.244 01/27/16 Wed 1830 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 32 1.161 10/03/16 Mon 2140 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 33 6.963 10/21/16 Fri 2208 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 34 5.955 01/13/16 Wed 0930 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 6.955 04/15/16 Fri 0028 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 2.869 01/22/16 Fri 1553 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 37 4.932 02/12/16 Fri 1400 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 38 2.573 07/15/16 Fri 0230 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 39 2.799 08/08/16 Mon 1120 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 0.436 08/08/16 Mon 1356 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 41 0.044 09/29/16 Thu 0929 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 2.561 06/13/16 Mon 1812 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 1.788 10/03/16 Mon 1429 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 4.702 02/O1/16 Mon 1445 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 45 3.218 09/21/16 Wed 1055 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 46 0.361 03/06/16 Sun 1845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 4.425 04/19/16 Tue 0648 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 48 0.654 06/18/16 Sat 2144 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 0.022 01/24/16 Sun 1926 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 50 8.051 01/13/16 Wed 0802 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 51 2.109 01/20/16 Wed 0937 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 52 4.543 03/26/16 Sat 0725 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 4.562 03/27/16 Sun 1143 Left-Turn 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 54 2.717 03/31/16 Thu 0858 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 2.394 04/10/16 Sun 0856 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 56 5.251 05/23/16 Mon 0547 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 57 6.146 06/13/16 Mon 1121 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 58 1.265 07/25/16 Mon 0815 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 4.562 08/02/16 Tue 1236 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 60 2.014 08/17/16 Wed 1205 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 61 3.023 08/19/16 Fri 1217 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 62 6.702 10/19/16 Wed 0111 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 63 4.567 03/03/16 Thu 1030 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 64 1.832 01/11/16 Mon 1255 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 1.941 02/12/16 Fri 1245 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 66 0.273 03/19/16 Sat 1245 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 2.080 04/01/16 Fri 0825 Sideswipe 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 5.659 04/13/16 Wed 0750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 69 2.014 09/07/16 Wed 1614 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 70 2.014 02/04/16 Thu 1545 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 71 4.959 02/12/16 Fri 1515 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 72 4.570 02/12/16 Fri 1815 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 73 2.441 02/18/16 Thu 1720 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 2.025 02/24/16 Wed 1335 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 75 2.985 02/16/16 Tue 0855 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 76 3.068 02/22/16 Mon 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 77 4.090 03/30/16 Wed 0905 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 78 1.976 04/02/16 Sat 0750 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 79 0.000 06/02/16 Thu 0728 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 1.930 01/08/16 Fri 1458 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 81 4.899 01/20/16 Wed 1900 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 82 6.121 01/20/16 Wed 2015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 83 2.725 02/06/16 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 84 0.022 02/08/16 Mon 1640 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 85 6.040 03/20/16 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 0.753 05/17/16 Tue 1630 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 87 0.910 08/29/16 Mon 1112 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 0.775 09/14/16 Wed 0728 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 89 2.771 10/31/16 Mon 0658 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 90 5.659 03/01/16 Tue 2005 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Red Light 91 1.254 03/14/16 1 Mon 2316 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 92 5.659 03/15/16 Tue 0117 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 93 1.390 04/07/16 Thu 1535 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 94 4.790 04/30/16 Sat 2315 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 95 4.683 05/14/16 Sat 0930 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 1.036 06/22/16 Wed 1700 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 97 6.140 07/O1/16 Fri 1655 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 98 2.556 07/04/16 Mon 1430 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 8.140 08/13/16 Sat 1850 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 100 5.659 08/19/16 Fri 1450 Curb 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 101 2.956 08/20/16 Sat 1745 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 1.038 08/21/16 Sun 1705 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 103 2.014 08/22/16 Mon 1444 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 104 0.527 08/22/16 Mon 2130 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 105 5.640 08/26/16 Fri 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 106 4.196 08/29/16 Mon 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 0.955 09/19/16 Mon 1235 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 108 11.025 09/20/16 Tue 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 109 2.928 09/26/16 Mon 1215 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 110 11.031 09/27/16 Tue 1110 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 111 3.890 09/30/16 Fri 0850 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 5.950 11/12/16 Sat 2210 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 113 3.918 03/05/16 Sat 1431 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 114 0.108 04/22/16 Fri 1709 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 115 8.708 06/25/16 Sat 1521 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 4.799 07/05/16 Tue 1544 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 117 1.928 07/12/16 Tue 1719 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 118 3.428 07/22/16 Fri 1501 Head-On 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 119 11.339 11/03/16 Thu 1132 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 4.727 03/23/16 Wed 1845 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 121 8.208 04/24/16 Sun 1442 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 122 5.687 04/24/16 Sun 1539 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 7.040 07/31/16 Sun 0125 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 124 1.928 08/07/16 Sun 1914 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 125 5.277 06/10/16 Fri 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 126 1.995 06/13/16 Mon 2000 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 127 5.840 08/01/16 Mon 0049 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 10.490 08/06/16 Sat 0035 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 129 9.264 12/12/16 Mon 0035 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 130 3.418 06/08/16 Wed 2027 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Improper Backing 131 1.709 09/16/16 Fri 1527 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 132 3.624 11/18/16 Fri 1354 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 133 5.645 12/23/16 Fri 1840 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 134 4.799 09/30/16 Fri 1446 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 135 4.709 11/02/16 Wed 1446 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 136 0.000 11/13/16 Sun 1537 Other Traffic Barrier 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 137 4.009 11/24/16 Thu 1955 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Wet No Contributing Action 138 2.014 12/03/16 Sat 1851 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 139 6.140 12/18/16 Sun 1148 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 6.149 09/19/16 Mon 1525 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 141 3.161 10/11/16 Tue 1530 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 142 2.763 12/20/16 Tue 1500 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 143 2.985 09/28/16 Wed 1604 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 144 2.908 10/14/16 Fri 1450 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 145 2.740 10/23/16 Sun 0540 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 2.012 11/04/16 Fri 1835 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 147 0.963 11/12/16 Sat 1920 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 148 0.237 12/08/16 Thu 1800 Pedalcycle 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 149 1.741 12/12/16 Mon 1740 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 150 5.659 12/23/16 Fri 2114 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 151 9.640 11/23/16 Wed 0600 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 152 3.705 12/29/16 Thu 0850 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 153 4.638 12/22/16 Thu 1230 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 154 1.786 12/31/16 Sat 1355 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 155 1.918 10/26/16 Wed 1240 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 156 2.014 10/26/16 Wed 1240 Left-Turn 1 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 157 2.156 09/07/16 Wed 0800 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 158 5.228 09/21/16 Wed 0806 Left-Turn 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2016 TO 12/2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 159 2.873 11/11/16 Fri 0500 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 160 1.170 11/18/16 Fri 1820 Head-On 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 161 9.643 12/16/16 Fri 1100 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 162 5.168 11/18/16 Fri 1315 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 162 2 84 76 55 2 30 13 5 11 0 16 1 16 0 7 Percent 1.23% 51.85% 46.91% 33.95% 1.23% 18.52% 8.02% 3.09% 6.79% 0.00% 9.88% 0.62% 9.88% 0.00% 4.32961 Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 117 45 13 149 60 47 2 2 2 2 0 2 3 10 0 Percent 1 72.22% 1 27.78% 1 8.02% 1 91.98% 1 37.04% 1 29.01% 1 1.23% 1 1.23% 1 1.23% 1 1.23% 0.00% 1.23% 1 1.8596 1 6.17% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 20,806 SPOT CRASH RATE: 21.332 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 4.494 01/16/17 Mon 2220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 2 4.475 03/19/17 Sun 1540 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 3 4.198 04/17/17 Mon 0815 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Improper Turn 4 1.832 06/20/17 Tue 2000 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action S 0.333 09/23/17 Sat 1009 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 6 1.832 07/10/17 Mon 0715 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Improper Turn 7 10.919 08/16/17 Wed 1510 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 8 0.917 09/01/17 Fri 1910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 1.838 05/11/17 Thu 1220 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 10 3.758 02/17/17 Fri 0900 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 3.391 06/29/17 Thu 0931 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 5.955 10/11/17 1 Wed 1400 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 13 2.850 12/20/17 Wed 0745 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 6.139 11/03/17 Fri 1810 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 15 5.333 11/16/17 Thu 0820 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 16 0.734 11/22/17 Wed 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 3.071 11/29/17 Wed 0650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 1.986 09/03/17 Sun 2103 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 19 5.668 09/27/17 Wed 0000 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Unknown Dry No Contributing Action 20 2.014 10/31/17 Tue 2008 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 21 5.955 04/04/17 Tue 2211 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 22 4.968 01/09/17 Mon 0822 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 2.441 01/29/17 Sun 0826 Curb 0 0 1 Day Wet Swerved Or Avoided 24 3.620 12/01/17 Fri 1600 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 2.869 12/01/17 Fri 1805 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 9.596 10/19/17 Thu 0734 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 0.108 07/19/17 Wed 2305 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 0.735 01/03/17 Tue 1817 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 0.913 02/07/17 Tue 1906 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 3.762 02/28/17 Tue 1503 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 5.159 04/19/17 Wed 0155 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 32 2.005 05/04/17 Thu 1420 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 5.140 05/16/17 Tue 1449 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 6.140 07/16/17 Sun 1636 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 1.038 08/15/17 Tue 1109 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 36 1.928 09/18/17 Mon 1637 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 37 0.913 09/23/17 Sat 0653 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 38 0.000 08/02/17 Wed 2315 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 9.978 01/12/17 Thu 1505 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 6.140 01/31/17 Tue 1705 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 41 2.392 02/13/17 Mon 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 2.664 02/15/17 Wed 1750 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 8.584 03/14/17 Tue 0355 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 44 4.562 04/12/17 Wed 1353 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 45 0.875 04/25/17 Tue 2000 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 6.131 05/O1/17 Mon 1820 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 10.214 02/O1/17 Wed 0741 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 1.014 04/17/17 Mon 1208 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 49 10.176 06/02/17 Fri 0801 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 50 4.062 06/17/17 Sat 0752 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 51 5.697 06/24/17 Sat 0800 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 52 4.475 07/27/17 Thu 0756 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 53 2.090 09/03/17 Sun 1303 Left-Turn 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 54 2.514 11/08/17 Wed 1017 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 6.140 02/12/17 Sun 0840 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 56 0.314 02/17/17 Fri 1030 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 6.055 03/23/17 Thu 0945 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 58 10.993 04/09/17 Sun 1155 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 6.159 04/16/17 Sun 1115 Curb 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 60 5.797 04/27/17 Thu 0841 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 10.938 09/29/17 Fri 0955 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 11.639 10/02/17 Mon 0943 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 2.928 10/16/17 Mon 0949 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 64 2.373 11/12/17 Sun 1112 Right-Turn 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 0.000 09/14/17 Thu 1130 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 66 0.239 03/05/17 Sun 1506 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 2.014 06/19/17 Mon 1819 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 68 1.941 06/20/17 Tue 1850 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 2.928 02/24/17 Fri 1110 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 70 5.640 03/08/17 Wed 1737 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 3.108 03/22/17 Wed 2137 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 72 9.624 04/27/17 Thu 1430 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 73 1.163 05/30/17 Tue 1810 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 74 1.290 06/23/17 Fri 2125 Head-On 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7S 1.928 08/07/17 Mon 1645 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 76 1.928 08/16/17 Wed 1635 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 77 4.898 10/24/17 Tue 1400 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 78 2.709 10/30/17 Mon1 INS Angle 0 0 1 Night Dr Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 79 5.761 11/02/17 Thu 1822 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2017 TO 12/2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAM DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE NIGHT (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 4.475 09/21/17 Thu 0910 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 81 6.136 09/28/17 Thu 1210 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 2.005 10/05/17 Thu 1130 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 83 1.481 10/14/17 Sat 1050 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 84 1.161 09/05/17 Tue 1437 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 4.459 12/27/17 Wed 0759 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 86 4.932 12/28/17 Thu 1311 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 87 2.928 05/15/17 Mon 0933 Angle 0 O 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 88 4.475 05/25/17 Thu 1300 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 89 9.843 06/26/17 Mon 1437 Not Coded 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 90 4.475 09/27/17 Wed 1635 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 91 2.924 10/02/17 Mon 1510 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 92 4.098 09/09/17 Sat 1100 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 93 2.012 10/13/17 Fri 1352 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 94 2.928 10/26/17 Thu 1133 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 95 0.957 12/18/17 Mon 1315 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 96 11.215 11/10/17 Fri 1450 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 97 2.928 11/17/17 Fri 1800 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 98 1.053 12/27/17 Wed 2145 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 2.774 11/20/17 Mon 1925 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 100 2.014 11/21/17 Tue 1447 Left-Turn 0 5 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 101 1.928 12/17/17 Sun 1651 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 102 1.381 04/22/17 Sat 1700 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 103 4.475 1 04/06/17 Thu 0830 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 104 2.489 12/20/17 Wed 0743 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 5.674 09/28/17 Thu 2030 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 106 0.791 01/27/17 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 107 0.427 03/15/17 Wed 1740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 108 0.431 03/31/17 Fri 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 5.659 04/27/17 Thu 1815 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 3.437 02/21/17 Tue 1408 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 111 4.932 1 04/21/17 Fri 1315 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 112 2.841 03/30/17 Thu 0955 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 113 0.000 05/02/17 Tue 0005 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 114 5.956 05/09/17 Tue 1236 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 115 1.777 01/19/17 Thu 2000 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 O 1 Night Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 116 0.254 04/05/17 Wed 0735 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 117 0.095 05/21/17 Sun 0400 Not Coded 0 O 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 118 1.367 08/04/17 Fri 0500 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 119 3.462 10/06/17 Fri 2020 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 120 6.939 08/30/17 Wed 1416 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 121 2.014 04/29/17 Sat 1740 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 122 3.719 08/15/17 Tue 1840 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 123 0.387 11/16/17 Thu 1125 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 124 0.114 07/14/17 Fri 1745 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 125 0.770 08/03/17 Thu 1740 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 126 1.928 08/16/17 Wed 1330 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 127 1.298 OS/23/17 Tue 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 128 1.645 05/24/17 Wed 0650 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 129 1.032 08/11/17 Fri 1302 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 130 0.957 08/16/17 Wed 0830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 131 4.627 09/03/17 Sun 1220 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 132 1.926 10/05/17 Thu 1140 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 133 0.427 09/04/17 Mon 1005 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 134 1.774 08/25/17 Fri 1400 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 135 3.278 11/13/17 Mon 1502 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 136 1.180 08/06/17 Sun 1130 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 137 4.570 08/20/17 Sun 1415 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 138 10.050 07/28/17 Fri 2340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 139 1.424 12/08/17 Fri 0841 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 140 5.659 12/05/17 Tue 1840 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 141 1.645 12/26/17 Tue 1940 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 142 5.940 11/08/17 Wed 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 143 2.928 11/24/17 Fri 1234 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 144 3.911 12/03/17 Sun 1827 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 145 8.546 11/13/17 Mon 1259 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 146 0.913 12/06/17 Wed 1938 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 147 1.825 10/30/17 1 Mon 0940 Angle 0 O 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 148 0.627 11/30/17 Thu 0946 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 149 0.527 12/13/17 Wed 1200 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 150 6.131 12/04/17 Mon 0840 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 151 5.773 12/01/17 Fri 1540 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 152 2.986 12/31/17 Sun 1550 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 152 0 53 99 47 1 40 10 1 7 0 4 6 15 0 14 Percent 0.00% 34.87% 65.13% 30.92% 0.66% 26.32% 6.58% 0.66% 4.61% 0.00% 2.63% 3.95% 9.87% 0.00% 9.21% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 114 37 10 142 42 45 6 5 2 1 0 0 3 6 0 Percent 1 75.00% 24.34% 1 6.58% 1 93.42% 1 27.63% 1 29.61% 1 3.9591 1 3.29% 1 1.32% 1 0.66% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 1.97% 1 3.95% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 20,806 1 SPOT CRASH RATE: 21.332 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES 1. State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 4.825 03/20/18 Tue 0850 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 2 4.780 02/06/18 Tue 1505 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 3 5.955 04/05/18 Thu 0730 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 4 4.799 02/06/18 Tue 1133 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action S 0.633 02/24/18 Sat 1040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 6 1.654 04/25/18 Wed 1045 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 7 0.572 05/02/18 Wed 0825 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 6.138 06/06/18 Wed 1330 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 6.527 06/22/18 Fri 1010 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 10 0.772 02/22/18 Thu 1236 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 2.873 OS/07/18 Mon 0725 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 12 1.768 01/23/18 1 Tue 1953 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 4.479 02/11/18 Sun 2334 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 0.235 OS/26/18 Sat 2315 Angle 0 1 0 Night Wet Improper Turn 15 3.391 03/2S/18 Sun 0020 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 10.889 04/16/18 Mon 0230 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 17 S.8S9 01/24/18 Wed 0637 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 18 8.008 03/30/18 Fri 1215 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 19 1.941 04/02/18 Mon 2040 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 4.471 04/09/18 Mon 0817 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 5.659 01/22/18 Mon 1117 Pedalcycle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 0.772 05/06/18 Sun 1253 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 23 2.869 10/07/18 Sun 0050 Backed Into 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 24 11.674 01/12/18 Fri 1920 Backed Into 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 4.062 01/26/18 Fri 1350 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 1.957 03/27/18 Tue 1945 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 1.746 01/15/18 Mon 1715 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 11.013 01/26/18 Fri 2143 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 29 1.626 02/18/18 Sun 1822 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 0.620 04/11/18 Wed 1235 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 2.014 05/19/18 Sat 1144 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 32 4.473 08/16/18 Thu 0630 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 33 1.158 02/26/18 Mon 1220 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 2.860 02/28/18 Wed 0740 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 6.168 03/12/18 Mon 1320 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 36 6.138 04/27/18 Fri 0800 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 1.928 05/07/18 Mon 1220 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 38 4.471 05/08/18 Tue 0820 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 39 5.650 05/08/18 Tue 0920 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 40 1.554 05/10/18 Thu 1015 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 41 4.480 07/02/18 Mon 0735 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 42 3.892 09/04/18 Tue 0910 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 43 0.237 09/10/18 Mon 1240 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 11.290 10/31/18 Wed 0735 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 45 1.928 04/03/18 Tue 1200 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 46 4.674 03/04/18 Sun 1115 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 47 5.374 01/OS/18 Fri 2125 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 4.589 04/26/18 Thu 14SO Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 2.005 10/12/18 Fri 1405 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 50 2.919 05/05/18 Sat 0801 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 51 0.000 04/24/18 Tue 1430 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 52 0.022 03/09/18 Fri 1817 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 53 4.590 06/O1/18 Fri 1722 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 54 2.928 04/16/18 Mon 0737 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 55 2.018 01/03/18 Wed 2248 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 56 0.420 02/09/18 Fri 1820 1 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 57 5.140 02/06/18 Tue 1535 Jackknife 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 58 9.643 03/28/18 Wed 1405 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 59 1.626 04/01/18 Sun 1735 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 60 5.235 06/20/18 Wed 2350 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 61 3.235 06/24/18 Sun 2320 Bridge Rail 0 1 1 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 62 1.772 06/04/18 Mon 1038 Angle 0 5 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 63 0.333 10/23/18 1 Tue 1736 Rear-End 0 4 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 0.168 11/26/18 Mon 1556 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 10.490 11/27/18 Tue 1511 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 66 3.906 12/13/18 Thu 1814 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 67 2.114 12/03/18 Mon 1050 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 68 2.928 12/17/18 Mon 0740 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 3.073 04/24/18 Tue 1450 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 70 0.235 07/08/18 Sun 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 1.928 07/19/18 Thu 1930 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 72 5.640 07/2S/18 Wed 0500 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 73 2.763 08/11/18 Sat 1300 Angle 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 74 2.014 OS/22/18 Tue 1028 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7S 4.313 10/30/18 Tue 0816 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 9.950 10/06/18 Sat 1915 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 77 0.422 10/15/18 Mon 1802 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 2.346 10/20/18 at 1755 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 1.941 11/15/18 Thu 1530 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90040000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 11.713 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 1.578 11/15/18 Thu 1818 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 81 0.021 11/23/18 Fri 1810 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 3.696 11/30/18 Fri 1445 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 83 4.495 12/14/18 Fri 1955 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 84 0.374 12/31/18 Mon 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 85 0.904 01/18/18 Thu 0835 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 86 6.939 01/12/18 Fri 1349 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Followed too Closely 87 1.535 01/06/18 Sat 1924 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 1.880 01/29/18 Mon 1710 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 89 4.484 01/30/18 Tue 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 90 0.736 07/09/18 Mon 1307 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 91 1.634 11/18/18 Sun 1240 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 92 6.140 01/03/18 Wed 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Red Light 93 6.134 01/06/18 Sat 1635 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 94 3.045 02/16/18 Fri 1455 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 95 0.957 01/01/18 Mon 1320 Not Coded 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 2.660 12/18/18 Tue 1525 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 97 3.881 11/25/18 Sun 0124 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 98 1.057 01/18/18 Thu 0925 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 99 1.424 03/25/18 Sun 1835 Right-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 100 0.248 06/11/18 Mon 2300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 101 6.045 12/14/18 Fri 1410 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 102 1.928 12/28/18 Fri 1320 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 103 1.038 02/15/18 Thu 1600 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 104 5.668 02/17/18 Sat 2010 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 105 2.873 03/01/18 Thu 1245 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 106 0.628 03/21/18 Wed 1423 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 107 4.627 05/11/18 Fri 1400 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 108 8.099 06/08/18 Fri 1730 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 3.758 07/05/18 Thu 1355 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 110 1.606 07/07/18 Sat 1900 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 111 6.455 07/11/18 Wed 1320 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 4.387 08/17/18 Fri 1705 Angle 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 113 2.599 11/07/18 Wed 1700 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 114 4.626 08/13/18 Mon 1519 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 115 2.300 11/05/18 Mon 0110 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Swerved Or Avoided 116 5.702 07/25/18 Wed 1536 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 2.869 10/03/18 Wed 1255 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 118 1.381 10/24/18 Wed 1735 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 119 4.562 1 11/01/18 Thu 1143 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 3.622 12/OS/18 Wed 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 121 6.235 1 10/15/18 Mon 1300 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 121 1 59 62 39 0 35 5 1 14 2 7 0 10 0 3 Percent 0.83% 48.76% 51.24% 32.23% 0.00% 28.93% 4.13% 0.83% 11.57% 1.65% 5.79% 0.00% 8.26% 0.00% 2.48% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 91 30 11 110 37 27 8 1 0 1 0 0 1 10 0 Percent 1 75.21% 1 24.79% 1 9.0991 1 90.9191 1 30.58% 1 22.31% 1 6.61% 1 0.83% 1 0.00% 1 0.83% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.83% I 8.262 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 20,806 SPOT CRASH RATE: 21.332 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90030000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 16.872 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 1.861 03/26/14 Wed 1620 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 2 15.047 12/22/14 Mon 1451 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 3 16.749 06/30/14 Mon 1503 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Other Not Coded 4 2.657 07/10/14 Thu 1427 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway S 16.060 10/29/14 Wed 1750 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 6 16.708 12/11/14 Thu 1917 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 7 0.735 03/07/14 Fri 0124 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 8 16.116 09/19/14 Fri 0122 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Wet I Drove too Fast for Conditions 9 11.980 10/10/14 Fri 0327 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 10 9.107 02/27/14 Thu 0825 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Wet Not Coded 11 4.715 03/14/14 Fri 0850 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 12 0.356 03/19/14 Wed 0855 Animal 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 13 2.899 04/29/14 Tue 1030 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 2.108 1 09/O1/14 Mon 1 1108 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 15 16.628 02/23/14 Sun 1915 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 6.755 02/26/14 Wed 1600 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 7.282 06/20/14 Fri 1650 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 18 16.613 01/15/14 Wed 1240 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 19 11.107 01/29/14 Wed 1301 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 16.613 02/11/14 Tue 1457 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 16.107 03/03/14 Mon 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 16.613 1 03/10/14 Mon 1900 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 23 2.088 04/13/14 Sun 1655 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 24 16.468 05/02/14 Fri 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 11.107 05/02/14 Fri 1913 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 26 11.107 05/06/14 Tue 2024 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 9.107 06/02/14 Mon 1600 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 28 11.107 03/09/14 Sun 0600 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 16.113 03/09/14 Sun 1135 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 11.107 1 04/10/14 Thu 1045 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.020 12/27/14 Sat 1125 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 5.715 12/28/14 Sun 1129 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 33 2.999 02/04/14 Tue 1349 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 34 3.876 03/27/14 Thu 1717 Fell/jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 0.330 06/07/14 Sat 1831 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 36 1.918 07/09/14 Wed 0328 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 37 16.708 07/22/14 Tue 1734 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 38 16.680 1 04/14/14 Mon 0815 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 39 16.670 05/09/14 Fri 1204 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 3.999 05/25/14 Sun 1245 Head-On 2 0 Day I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane M 0.790 09/04/14 Thu 1800 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Da Dr Improper Passing 16.197 10/09/14 Thu 1231 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14.107 12/22/14 Man 1540 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5.706 12/17/14 Wed 0907 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded0.399 05/25/14 Sun 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 45 1 17 28 15 1 7 0 0 8 0 0 1 5 0 3 Percent 2.22% 37.78% 62.22% 33.33% 2.22% 15.56% 0.00% 0.00% 17.78% 0.00% 0.00% 2.22% 11.11% 0.00% 6.67% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Errati77 Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 36 9 3 41 15 5 1 0 1 3 0 0 2 4 0 Percent 1 80.00% 1 20.00% 1 6.67% 1 91.11% 1 33.33% 1 11.11% 1 2.22% 1 0.00% 1 2.22% 1 6.67% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 4.44% 1 8.8991 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 17,240 SPOT CRASH RATE: 7.151 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90030000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 16.872 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 16.560 05/07/15 Thu 1343 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 2 0.413 10/31/15 Sat 1820 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 3 2.073 05/23/15 Sat 0500 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 6.848 12/05/15 Sat 2335 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 5 16.107 07/07/15 Tue 2138 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 6 13.003 07/23/15 Thu 1741 1 Sideswipe 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 7 16.060 10/11/15 Sun 0544 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 16.872 03/23/15 Mon 1610 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 9 15.965 02/05/15 Thu 2257 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 7.263 01/13/15 Tue 0830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 0.019 02/23/15 Mon 1225 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 16.088 03/14/15 Sat 1145 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 13.107 03/21/15 Sat 0745 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 1.399 06/03/15 Wed 1 1155 Sideswipe 0 1 1 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 15 9.107 04/25/15 Sat 1915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 9.932 03/08/15 Sun 1820 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day I Dry No Contributing Action 17 15.965 07/24/15 Fri 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 16.451 02/25/15 Wed 1736 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 9.892 02/25/15 Wed 1153 Not Coded 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 8.904 02/14/15 Sat 1257 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 16.310 05/11/15 Mon 1115 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 22 10.932 04/06/15 Mon 1735 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 2.712 04/12/15 Sun 1740 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 0.890 08/06/15 Thu 2337 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Wrong Side or Wrong Way 25 0.890 02/24/15 Tue 0240 Other Traffic Barrier 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 3.876 07/0S/15 Sun 1450 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 27 16.060 07/20/15 Mon 1839 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 0.020 08/25/15 Tue 1529 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 16.060 09/15/15 Tue 1446 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 16.060 09/19/15 Sat 1826 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 16.060 10/08/15 Thu 1514 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 32 12.72S 04/21/15 Tue 14SS Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 16.494 10/21/15 Wed 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 5.892 12/02/15 Wed 1715 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 35 16.496 04/19/15 Sun 1219 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 36 10.107 04/22/15 Wed 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 37 16.704 08/29/15 Sat 1735 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 38 16.765 07/09/15 Thu 1534 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 0.029 12/08/15 Tue 1739 Angle 0 0 1 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 40 11.107 10/13/15 Tue 1115 Rear-End 0 7 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 2.107 11/03/15 Tue 0909 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 6.107 11/16/15 Mon 1245 Fence 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 43 15.107 08/12/15 Wed 0928 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 1 8.951 09/22/15 Tue 1040 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 44 1 19 25 19 0 5 0 0 8 0 1 0 6 0 3 Percent 2.27% 43.18% 56.82% 43.18% 0.00% 11.36% 0.00% 0.00% 18.181% 0.00% 2.27% 0.00% 13.64% 0.00% 6.82% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic7 Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 36 8 3 41 24 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 1 Percent 1 81.82% 1 18.18% 1 6.82% 1 93.18% 1 54.55% 1 4.55% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 2.27% 1 0.00% 4.55% 2.27% 1 4.55% 1 2.27% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 18,900 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.378 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90030000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 16.872 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 16.012 06/13/16 Mon 1227 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 6.848 05/09/16 Mon 1600 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 16.060 02/11/16 Thu 1515 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 1.842 04/15/16 Fri 0631 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 16.060 03/OS/16 Sat 1238 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 6 16.477 08/31/16 Wed 1135 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7 1.021 01/09/16 Sat 1709 Head-On 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 8 13.107 01/10/16 Sun 0033 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 16.810 OS/13/16 Fri 2234 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 10 14.025 OS/07/16 Sat 0951 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 11 8.932 04/25/16 Mon 0048 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 6.282 09/21/16 Wed 0800 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 13 16.727 02/09/16 Tue 1842 Pedestrian 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 14 0.027 03/30/16 Wed 0650 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 15.047 06/26/16 Sun 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 16.075 07/12/16 Tue 0840 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 17 0.635 02/13/16 Sat 1300 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 0.924 02/26/16 Fri 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 16.197 04/04/16 Mon 0320 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 0.540 01/09/16 Sat 1315 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 0.899 06/11/16 Sat 0800 Fence 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 12.025 08/14/16 Sun 1440 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 4.932 10/17/16 Mon 1330 Head-On 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 16.803 03/27/16 Sun 1448 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 13.003 05/22/16 Sun 1648 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 16.457 07/OS/16 Tue 1856 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 7.754 07/25/16 Mon 1721 Head-On 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 28 5.517 OS/30/16 Mon 0029 Head-On 1 0 Night Dry Swerved Or Avoided 29 16.060 07/02/16 Sat 1705 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 30 10.930 07/14/16 Thu 1710 Head-On 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 10.930 07/14/16 Thu 1710 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 16.803 08/16/16 Tue 1600 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 2.073 10/11/16 Tue 1616 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 5.715 12/18/16 Sun 1415 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 16.523 10/16/16 Sun 1235 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 15.047 11/13/16 Sun 1435 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 6.094 12/19/16 Mon 1425 Bridge Rail 0 O 1 Da Dr No Contributing Action 38 16.477 12/30/16 Fri 1115 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 16.107 12/22/16 Thu 2246 Fence 0 0 1 1 Night Other Drove too Fast for Conditions Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 39 2 21 18 17 5 4 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 0 2 Percent 5.13% 53.85% 46.15% 43.59% 12.82% 10.26% 0.00% 0.00% 2.56% 0.00% 5.13% 0.00% 15.38% 0.00% 5.13% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 30 9 0 38 24 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Percent 76.927 23.08% 1 0.00% 97.44% 1 61.54% 1 7.69% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 2.56% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 2.56% 1 0.00% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,453 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.494 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90030000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 16.872 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 16.708 08/25/17 Fri 1625 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 2 9.893 02/17/17 Fri 2313 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 3 0.020 11/17/17 Fri 1940 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 4 11.980 10/06/17 Fri 1955 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 5 16.477 02/27/17 Mon 1230 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 6 16.449 08/31/17 Thu 2219 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7 11.980 07/23/17 Sun 0333 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 8 0.019 08/09/17 Wed 1609 Not Coded 0 4 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 9 15.057 06/12/17 Mon 0923 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 13.003 09/22/17 Fri 1617 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 3.876 05/14/17 Sun 1707 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 12 16.572 09/24/17 Sun 1753 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 1.902 08/10/17 Thu 0656 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 1 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 14 5.639 09/19/17 Tue 1700 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 16.689 07/20/17 Thu 1245 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 16.145 03/12/17 Sun 1800 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 17 14.025 06/14/17 Wed 1815 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 16.113 06/15/17 Thu 1715 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 19 16.651 09/25/17 Mon 1529 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 3.715 10/12/17 Thu 2135 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 21 16.449 08/05/17 Sat 2048 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 0.899 08/15/17 Tue 1544 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 23 9.893 09/27/17 Wed 2040 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 16.060 11/15/17 Wed 2040 Rear-End 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2S 16.477 10/31/17 Tue 1813 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 5.620 07/11/17 Tue 1310 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 27 16.746 02/18/17 Sat 2110 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 28 16.060 02/22/17 Wed 1845 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 29 3.089 11/16/17 Thu 1435 Guardrail Face 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 3.089 08/09/17 Wed 1616 Sideswipe 0 2 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 31 16.736 08/15/17 Tue 1400 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 32 16.003 11/29/17 Wed 1040 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 33 3.899 12/19/17 Tue 2044 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 34 16.675 12/28/17 Thu 1616 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 0.081 11/30/17 Thu 0516 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 3.876 12/07/17 Thu 1538 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 2.073 12/28/17 Thu 1400 Rear-End 1 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 16.060 11/29/17 Wed 1810 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 38 0 18 20 13 0 4 1 1 3 0 3 1 5 0 6 Percent 0.00% 47.37% 52.63% 34.21% 0.00% 10.53% 2.63% 2.63% 7.89% 0.00% 7.89% 2.63% 13.16% 0.00% 15.79% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 26 12 3 35 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 Percent I__6g`,_42_V7 31.58% 1 7.89% 92.11% 1 39.47% 1 13.16% 1 2.63% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 2.63% 1 2.63% 1 5.26% 1 0.00% 11 TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,453 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.494 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90030000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 16.872 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 9.893 07/23/18 Mon 1205 Not Coded 0 5 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 2 7.845 03/15/18 Thu 1610 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 3 16.708 04/02/18 Mon 1205 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 7.348 03/15/18 Thu 1614 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 5 16.753 07/12/18 Thu 2125 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 6 16.060 01/13/18 Sat 0800 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 7 8.829 08/19/18 Sun 2000 Other Non-Collision 0 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 8 4.576 11/10/18 Sat 0915 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 9 0.645 01/02/18 Tue 1752 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 11.980 03/15/18 Thu 1120 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 11 8.932 04/09/18 Mon 0937 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 12 10.930 04/12/18 Thu 1009 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 13 1.918 03/11/18 Sun 1250 Angle 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 16.737 02/17/18 Sat 1845 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 0.640 02/27/18 Tue 1916 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 1.021 03/14/18 Wed 1430 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 13.003 04/23/18 Mon 1635 Not Coded 0 6 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 18 16.060 04/07/18 Sat 1235 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 2.899 08/14/18 Tue 1042 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 20 16.755 07/04/18 Wed 1310 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 21 11.980 10/19/18 Fri 0250 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 4.887 08/02/18 Thu 0510 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Night Wet Swerved Or Avoided 23 13.003 04/10/18 Tue 0850 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 24 4.887 05/25/18 Fri 0714 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 25 0.070 03/11/18 Sun 1950 Left-Turn 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 26 16.060 06/01/18 Fri 2050 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 27 5.892 06/04/18 Mon 1821 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 28 7.845 07/13/18 Fri 2100 Angle 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 29 0.899 10/22/18 Mon 1030 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 30 16.334 05/17/18 Thu 0145 Not Coded 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 31 2.073 05/08/18 Tue 1031 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 13.003 09/05/18 Wed 1410 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 15.107 11/18/18 Sun 2240 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 16.296 11/09/18 Fri 0451 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 35 0.020 03/14/18 Wed 1227 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 7.845 07/06/18 Fri 1438 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 8.932 10/31/18 Wed 2051 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 11.980 09/O1/18 Sat 2045 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 39 8.932 11/25/18 Sun 1340 Not Coded 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 2.573 04/04/18 Wed 0520 Embankment 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 41 8.932 11/17/18 Sat 0056 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Passing 42 9.893 11/11/18 Sun 2147 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 5.892 02/20/18 Tue 0915 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 5.715 03/07/18 Wed 1430 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 45 8.932 05/16/18 Wed 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 3.876 06/28/18 Thu 1230 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 47 8.932 08/13/18 Mon 0725 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 48 0.390 06/03/18 Sun 0420 Ditch 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 1.021 08/23/18 Thu 0025 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 50 1.021 08/21/18 Tue 0815 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 51 1.021 08/24/18 Fri 0955 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 0.000 08/07/18 Tue 1225 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 53 12.607 10/17/18 Wed 1827 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 16.060 11/08/18 Thu 1355 Sideswipe 1 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner SS 14.025 09/15/18 Sat 1450 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 0.520 10/27/181 Sat 1415 Other Non-Collision 1 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 57 11.980 10/10/18 Wed 0600 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 57 4 28 27 18 0 10 3 0 5 0 2 1 8 0 5 Percent 7.02% 49.12% 47.37% 31.58% 0.00% 17.54% 5.26% 0.00% 8.77% 0.00% 3.51% 1.75% 14.04% 0.00% 8.77% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 35 22 5 52 20 9 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 6 0 Percent 1 61.40% 1 38.60% 1 8.77% 1 91.23% 1 35.09% 1 15.79% 1 3.51% 0.00% 1 1.75% 1 3.51% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 10.53% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 16,453 SPOT CRASH RATE: 6.494 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 2.293 01/04/14 Sat 2355 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 2 1.461 01/04/14 Sat 1019 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 3 0.065 01/12/14 Sun 0830 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 4 0.083 01/18/14 Sat 2040 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 20.490 01/20/14 Man 1153 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 6 0.387 01/22/14 Wed 0744 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7 15.306 01/28/14 Tue 1720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 8 1.375 01/29/14 Wed 0407 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 9 4.870 02/03/14 Mon 0730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 6.120 02/05/14 Wed 2035 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 11 18.444 02/07/14 Fri 1402 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 17.123 02/08/14 Sat 2005 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 7.973 02/09/14 Sun 0715 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 14 0.065 1 02/10/14 Mon 1243 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 15 21.711 02/10/14 Mon 1540 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 15.481 02/12/14 Wed 1155 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 17 4.001 02/13/14 Thu 0705 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 18 19.544 02/15/14 Sat 0945 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 6.200 02/16/14 Sun 1658 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 20 0.763 02/17/14 Mon 1615 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 20.490 02/20/14 Thu 0815 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 3.395 1 03/02/14 Sun 0430 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Not Coded 23 7.041 03/02/14 Sun 2015 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 5.979 03/06/14 Thu 0735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 14.818 03/24/14 Mon 2347 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 26 12.120 03/25/14 Tue 1500 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 26.206 03/26/14 Wed 1009 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 5.920 03/26/14 Wed 1732 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 26.040 04/02/14 1 Wed 1731 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 22.450 04/02/14 Wed 1630 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 20.490 04/10/14 Thu 1730 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 18.175 04/12/14 Sat 0700 Ditch 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 16.689 04/12/14 Sat 0320 Tree(Standing) 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 34 20.490 04/21/14 Mon 0730 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 35 12.434 04/23/14 Wed 1130 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 36 19.712 1 04/23/14 Wed 1803 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 37 6.116 04/23/14 Wed 1101 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 38 17.689 04/24/14 Thu 1400 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 14.818 04/28/14 Mon 0750 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 24.517 04/28/14 Mon 1852 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 41 O.SSO 04/29/14 Tue 2035 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 0.065 05/24/14 Sat 1935 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 6.162 OS/27/14 Tue 0925 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 6.220 1 05/29/14 Thu 1745 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4S 5.474 OS/31/14 Sat 2330 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 46 0.387 06/03/14 Tue 1438 Angle 0 1 2 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 47 14.820 06/OS/14 Thu 0832 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 48 13.818 06/07/14 Sat 1115 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Not Coded 49 0.387 06/13/14 Fri 1600 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 50 22.439 06/17/14 Tue 1614 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 51 1.461 06/19/14 Thu 0015 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 52 18.465 1 06/29/14 Sun 2015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 53 18.446 07/05/14 Sat 0121 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 0.963 07/07/14 Mon 1011 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 55 26.186 07/18/14 Fri 1214 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 14.818 07/18/14 Fri 0950 Sideswipe 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 57 25.997 07/18/14 Fri 1929 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 58 10.394 07/31/14 Thu 1400 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 1.180 08/02/14 Sat 1530 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 18.965 1 08/04/14 Mon 1957 Head-On 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 61 2.133 08/07/14 Thu 1830 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 10.937 08/10/14 Sun 1410 Not Coded 0 1 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 63 25.996 08/14/14 Thu 0014 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 22.439 09/05/14 Fri 1405 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 22.357 09/10/14 Wed 1015 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 66 16.461 09/16/14 Tue 0600 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 67 6.047 09/16/14 Tue 1540 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 25.997 1 09/16/14 Tue 2011 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 0.349 09/19/14 Fri 1849 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 70 6.160 09/21/14 Sun 1435 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 71 0.065 09/21/14 Sun 0656 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 72 0.387 09/22/14 Mon 0705 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry Other Contributing Action 73 1.461 09/23/14 Tue 2148 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 74 17.965 09/24/14 Wed 1745 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 75 5.283 09/26/14 Fri 2004 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 76 18.953 09/29/14 Mon 1340 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 77 0.065 10/09/14 Thu 0603 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Red Light 78 16.858 10/11/14 Sat 2138 Left-Turn 1 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 79 0.763 10/12/14 Sun 2010 Immersion 0 0 1 Ni ht Wet Improper Backing 80 23.981 10/13/14 Mon 1425 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 81 0.388 10/13/14 Mon 1918 Rear-End 0 0 1 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 82 18.446 10/18/14 Sat 1220 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 83 23.686 10/25/14 Sat 1755 Angle 0 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 84 20.509 10/26/14 Sun 0215 Rear-End 0 6 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 8S 17.770 11/03/14 Mon 1000 Fence 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 86 1.470 11/06/14 Thu 1504 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 87 6.764 11/06/14 Thu 1030 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 26.244 11/07/14 Fri 0950 Rear-End 0 6 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 89 25.540 11/10/14 Mon 1939 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 90 5.925 11/21/14 Fri 0700 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 91 20.838 11/22/14 Sat 0700 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 92 16.880 11/23/14 Sun 0615 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 93 2.763 11/25/14 Tue 0958 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 94 16.461 11/26/14 Wed 1050 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 95 6.162 11/29/14 Sat 1609 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 96 0.550 12/03/14 Wed 1815 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 97 26.073 12/04/14 Thu 2351 Animal 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 98 11.318 12/05/14 Fri 1218 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 99 18.156 12/06/14 Sat 0114 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 100 0.387 12/08/14 Mon 1250 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 101 0.531 12/09/14 Tue 0035 Embankment 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 102 16.499 12/16/14 Tue 1450 Other Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 103 25.788 12/22/14 Mon 0645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 104 0.763 12/22/14 Mon 1740 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 0.839 12/24/14 Wed 0642 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 106 6.162 12/25/14 Thu 1415 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 107 2/2 11.620 18/14 Sun 1314 Pedalcycle 0 0 Da Dr Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 108 20.720 12/30/14 Tue 1520 1 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 1 0.503 1 12/30/141 Tue 1 1015 1 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 109 3 62 45 36 1 20 4 0 7 0 6 1 23 0 5 Percent 2.75% 56.88% 41.28% 33.03% 0.92% 18.35% 3.67% 0.00% 6.42% 0.00% 5.50% 0.92% 21.10% 0.00% 4.59% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 78 31 11 98 38 18 1 3 3 2 0 1 2 11 0 Percent 1 71.56% 1 28.44% 1 10.09% 1 89.91% 1 34.86% 1 16.51% 1 0.92% 1 2.75% 1 2.75% 1 1.83% 1 0.00% 1 0.92% 1 1.83% 1 10.09% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 20,116 SPOT CRASH RATE: 14.845 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 20.282 01/02/15 Fri 1125 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 16.775 01/03/15 Sat 0059 Overturn/Rollover 0 3 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 3 25.997 01/06/15 Tue 1730 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 4 0.193 01/08/15 Thu 1400 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 2.463 01/09/15 Fri 1100 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 4.627 01/11/15 Sun 1607 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 19.934 01/14/15 Wed 0056 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 8 0.065 01/14/15 Wed 1257 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 4.965 01/15/15 Thu 2149 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 10 26.025 01/15/15 Thu 0940 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 22.467 01/18/15 Sun 1545 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 0.763 01/25/15 Sun 1400 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 13 0.550 01/27/15 Tue 1037 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 22.348 01/27/15 Tue 0710 Traffic Sign Support 0 1 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 15 25.997 01/31/15 Sat 0911 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 23.592 02/O1/15 Sun 0915 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 1.461 02/02/15 Mon 1907 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 18 15.353 02/05/15 Thu 1355 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 19 25.827 02/06/15 Fri 0646 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 6.048 02/07/15 Sat 1810 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 21 12.434 02/07/15 Sat 2016 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Ran Stop Sign 22 4.813 02/07/15 Sat 0130 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.531 02/09/15 Mon 1157 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 25.246 02/12/15 Thu 1153 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 16.877 02/13/15 Fri 2045 Guardrail Face 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 4.155 02/14/15 Sat 2025 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 27 22.467 02/16/15 Mon 1700 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 23.977 02/17/15 Tue 0245 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 29 0.387 02/25/15 Wed 1958 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 5.690 02/27/15 Fri 1055 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 18.459 03/04/15 Wed 0926 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 32 14.108 03/08/15 Sun 1510 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 33 22.939 03/10/15 Tue 1946 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 22.430 03/13/15 Fri 1510 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 35 0.559 03/16/15 Mon 0855 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 36 0.387 03/17/15 Tue 1830 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 37 2.499 03/17/15 Tue 0456 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 38 4.501 03/17/15 Tue 1828 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 39 4.501 03/17/15 Tue 1814 Head-On 4 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 40 0.387 03/19/15 Thu 1750 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 25.540 03/23/15 Mon 1519 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 11.852 03/27/15 Fri 2055 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 43 23.988 03/27/15 Fri 1510 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 44 22.429 03/29/15 Sun 1845 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 45 22.783 03/30/15 Mon 1850 Animal 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 46 22.211 04/03/15 Fri 1816 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 6.162 04/10/15 Fri 2223 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 22.611 04/13/15 Mon 1414 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 17.392 04/13/15 Mon 0815 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 50 21.725 04/15/15 Wed 0042 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 26.025 04/17/15 Fri 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 22.646 04/17/15 Fri 1735 Fence 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 14.818 04/20/15 Mon 1449 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 54 18.389 04/23/15 Thu 1455 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 55 11.931 04/26/15 Sun 1410 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 56 6.076 04/30/15 Thu 0400 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 57 25.684 05/01/15 Fri 0221 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 58 23.981 05/02/15 Sat 1425 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 59 13.434 05/07/15 Thu 0757 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 60 14.837 05/08/15 Fri 1254 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 17.354 05/15/15 Fri 0638 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 26.247 05/16/15 Sat 0905 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 0.065 05/17/15 Sun 1145 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 64 0.065 05/18/15 Mon 0706 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 65 20.447 05/21/15 Thu 1526 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 66 0.065 05/23/15 Sat 1301 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Other Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 67 11.901 06/07/15 Sun 0424 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 68 20.433 06/11/15 Thu 1155 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 69 0.000 06/21/15 Sun 2200 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 70 12.586 06/25/15 Thu 1639 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 25.997 06/27/15 Sat 1313 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 72 0.172 06/30/15 Tue 1650 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 73 5.972 07/02/15 Thu 1151 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 0.387 07/03/15 Fri 1418 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 75 25.540 07/04/15 Sat 1551 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 21.476 07/05/15 Sun 0503 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 77 26.073 07/12/15 Sun 1130 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 78 0.550 07/14/15 Tue 1736 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 23.726 07/16/15 Thu 2256 1 Angle 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 18.446 07/31/15 Fri 0635 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 81 15.323 08/15/15 Sat 1111 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 0.387 08/16/15 Sun 1814 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 83 6.783 08/18/15 Tue 1550 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 84 5.430 08/22/15 Sat 0627 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 85 22.230 08/22/15 Sat 1225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 4.650 08/23/15 Sun 0054 Guardrail Face 5 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 87 22.495 08/29/15 Sat 1648 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 88 20.720 08/31/15 Mon 0800 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 89 0.065 09/14/15 Mon 1230 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 90 25.559 09/15/15 Tue 1218 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 91 18.726 09/27/15 1 Sun 1955 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 92 0.550 09/28/15 Mon 0710 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 93 14.837 10/02/15 Fri 1525 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 94 26.195 10/08/15 Thu 1654 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 95 6.453 10/11/15 Sun 0125 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 96 26.227 10/11/15 Sun 1010 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 97 0.550 10/15/15 Thu 0750 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 98 2.763 10/20/15 Tue 0636 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 99 12.434 10/20/15 Tue 0747 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 100 20.635 10/23/15 Fri 1236 Angle 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 101 4.001 10/27/15 Tue 1450 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 0.065 11/01/15 Sun 0345 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 103 0.000 11/01/15 Sun 0042 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 104 5.803 11/05/15 Thu 0901 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 105 18.183 11/08/15 Sun 0420 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 106 11.806 11/09/15 Mon 1645 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 25.959 11/11/15 Wed 1130 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 108 23.592 11/14/15 Sat 1842 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 109 25.445 11/16/15 Mon 0723 Angle 0 2 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 110 12.434 11/29/15 Sun 0000 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 111 22.802 12/01/15 Tue 1234 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 112 5.158 12/01/15 Tue 1640 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 113 23.943 12/02/15 Wed 1150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 18.194 12/03/15 Thu 1610 Angle 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 115 5.294 12/03/15 Thu 1802 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Not Coded 116 11.234 12/04/15 Fri 1735 Left-Turn 0 3 1 0 Night Wet Improper Turn 117 0.387 12/05/15 Sat 0830 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 118 0.387 12/05/15 Sat 0900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 119 10.630 12/10/15 Thu 1815 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 17.490 12/13/15 Sun 1616 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 121 0.368 12/18/15 Fri 1705 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 23.284 12/21/15 Mon 1832 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 2.999 12/21/15 Mon 0348 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 124 25.540 12/24/15 Thu 1200 1 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 125 13.534 12/26/15 Sat 1402 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 126 26.097 12/26/15 Sat 1045 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 127 26.067 12/27/15 Sun 1036 Not Coded 0 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 25.245 12/28/15 Mon 2137 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 129 22.649 12/29/15 Tue 2125 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 1 4.655 12/30/15 Wed 1225 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 130 3 64 65 43 1 21 6 0 5 0 11 1 23 0 8 Percent 2,31% 49,23% 50,00% 33,08% 0,77% 16,15% 4,62% 0,00% 3,85% 0,00% 8,46% 0,77% 17,69% 0,00% 6,35% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 87 43 13 116 51 19 4 1 4 1 0 2 3 18 0 Percent 1 66.92% 1 33.08% 1 10.00% 1 89.23% 1 39.23% 1 14.62% 1 3.08% 1 0.77% 1 3.08% 1 0.77% 1 0.00% 1 1.54% 1 2.31% 1 13.8596 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 21,163 SPOT CRASH RATE: 16.830 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 22.954 01/02/16 Sat 1103 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 25.994 01/03/16 Sun 1253 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 3 22.214 01/04/16 Mon 1133 Angle 6 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 15.481 01/06/16 Wed 1340 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded S 0.000 01/08/16 Fri 1510 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 6 22.311 01/16/16 Sat 2254 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 25.992 01/18/16 Mon 1200 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 8 0.000 01/22/16 Fri 1325 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 9 22.604 01/22/16 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 10 0.550 01/28/16 Thu 1643 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 11 25.997 01/30/16 Sat 1452 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 17.582 01/31/16 1 Sun 1545 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 14.409 01/31/16 Sun 1045 Angle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 15.376 02/OS/16 Fri 2025 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 8.411 02/07/16 Sun 2300 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 16 5.975 02/07/16 Sun 0650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 21.987 02/11/16 Thu 1450 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 18 11.974 02/13/16 Sat 1742 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 0.112 02/14/16 Sun 0442 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Ran Red Light 20 9.815 02/14/16 Sun 2354 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 21 26.292 02/20/16 Sat 1430 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 23.592 02/24/16 Wed 1843 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.990 02/25/16 Thu 1730 Rear-End 0 5 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 24 17.538 02/27/16 Sat 0041 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 25 17.702 02/27/16 Sat 1940 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 23.981 03/02/16 Wed 1834 Ditch 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 27 0.387 03/08/16 Tue 0803 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 15.460 03/08/16 Tue 1628 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 16.385 03/09/16 Wed 0430 1 Tree(Standing) 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 30 17.690 03/10/16 Thu 2338 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 31 17.465 03/11/16 Fri 1735 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 32 16.493 03/12/16 Sat 0500 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 0.763 03/12/16 Sat 2027 Angle 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 34 6.774 03/14/16 Mon 1537 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 35 0.056 03/19/16 Sat 1213 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 36 16.433 03/20/16 Sun 1134 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 37 24.997 03/22/16 Tue 2057 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 3.774 03/26/16 Sat 0945 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 20.462 03/28/16 Mon 1515 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 1.763 03/28/16 Mon 2355 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 6.010 03/31/16 Thu 0805 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 42 19.622 04/03/16 Sun 1109 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 43 25.912 04/OS/16 Tue 0941 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 26.247 04/OS/16 Tue 1800 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4S 22.967 04/10/16 Sun 2015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 0.387 04/15/16 Fri 1835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 47 22.481 04/18/16 Mon 1430 Fence 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 48 0.757 04/18/16 Mon 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 16.423 04/21/16 Thu 1710 Embankment 0 1 0 Day Wet Followed too Closely 50 18.546 04/22/16 Fri 0820 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 20.470 04/26/16 Tue 1743 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 6.029 04/27/16 Wed 1617 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 53 20.585 04/28/16 Thu 1325 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 26.277 04/28/16 Thu 0945 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 55 25.897 05/02/16 Mon 1453 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 7.162 05/04/16 Wed 1230 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 57 0.000 05/07/16 Sat 1110 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 58 25.459 05/09/16 Mon 1657 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 59 22.078 05/10/16 Tue 0925 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 25.902 05/14/16 Sat 1541 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 26.548 05/21/16 Sat 1925 Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 62 26.188 05/22/16 Sun 0753 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 11.303 06/08/16 Wed 0650 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 64 6.143 06/08/16 Wed 1910 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 4.813 06/09/16 Thu 0825 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 66 23.592 06/14/16 Tue 1424 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 25.808 06/18/16 Sat 1307 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 16.619 06/21/16 Tue 1840 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 15.467 06/22/16 Wed 1040 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 20.390 06/26/16 Sun 1647 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 71 26.276 06/28/16 Tue 1528 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 72 20.490 06/30/16 Thu 0827 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 73 0.387 06/30/16 Thu 2125 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 74 12.352 07/06/16 Wed 1645 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7S 23.586 07/13/16 Wed 0740 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 76 14.875 07/16/16 Sat 2121 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 77 16.487 07/17/16 Sun 2358 Animal 0 0 1 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 78 25.497 07/21/16 Thu 1441 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 79 18.351 07/22/161 Fri 0010 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 5 Night I Dry No Contributing Action State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 80 0.263 07/23/16 Sat 1008 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 81 22.486 07/23/16 Sat 1112 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 82 24.481 07/26/16 Tue 1830 Head-On 0 5 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 83 12.458 07/27/16 Wed 1600 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 84 10.384 07/28/16 Thu 1405 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 85 14.974 07/28/16 Thu 0130 Ditch 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 86 10.483 08/01/16 Mon 2043 Rear-End 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 0.470 08/02/16 Tue 2056 Head-On 0 2 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 88 0.763 08/02/16 Tue 1053 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 89 15.818 08/05/16 Fri 2241 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 90 25.997 08/06/16 Sat 1345 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 91 0.000 08/11/16 Thu 2143 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 92 23.592 08/13/16 Sat 1342 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 93 0.970 08/24/16 Wed 0000 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 94 23.974 09/04/16 Sun 1512 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 95 2.550 09/04/16 Sun 0830 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 96 6.162 09/05/16 Mon 0545 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 97 22.720 09/09/16 Fri 2214 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 98 6.162 09/17/16 Sat 1607 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 99 25.928 09/17/16 Sat 0152 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 100 8.411 09/18/16 Sun 0454 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 101 25.959 09/23/16 Fri 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 102 2.499 10/04/16 Tue 0835 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 103 12.434 10/06/16 Thu 1854 Angle 0 3 0 Night Wet Improper Passing 104 17.677 10/10/16 Mon 0815 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 11.474 10/18/16 Tue 1745 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 106 18.194 10/21/16 Fri 0811 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 107 25.379 10/22/16 Sat 1920 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 1 Night Dry Not Coded 108 0.037 10/24/16 Mon 1355 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 109 4.974 10/27/16 Thu 1827 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 110 25.902 10/27/16 Thu 1708 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 111 22.859 10/30/16 Sun 0504 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 112 19.974 10/31/16 Mon 0800 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 113 16.711 11/01/16 Tue 1621 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 26.006 11/03/16 Thu 1835 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 115 20.105 11/04/16 Fri 0801 Angle 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 16.868 11/11/16 Fri 0934 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 10.443 11/15/16 Tue 1715 Angle 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 118 25.997 11/22/16 Tue 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 119 3.395 11/27/16 Sun 2029 Fence 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 0.065 11/30/16 Wed 1945 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 121 6.662 12/01/16 Thu 0733 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 122 26.498 12/02/16 Fri 2331 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 123 21.254 12/05/16 Mon 1225 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 124 5.758 12/06/16 Tue 0017 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 125 2.499 12/08/16 Thu 0717 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 126 26.302 12/09/16 Fri 1830 Pedestrian 0 0 Night Dry I No Contributing Action 127 26.027 12/10/16 Sat 0923 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 16.399 12/15/16 Thu 1234 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 129 20.664 12/17/16 Sat 1209 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 12.453 12/19/16 Mon 1056 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 131 25.988 12/20/16 Tue 1505 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 132 21.254 12/26/16 Mon 0210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 133 18.370 1 12/29/16 Thu 1800 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 134 13.120 12/30/16 Fri 0900 Angle 5 0 Day I Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 135 1 11.401 1 12/31/16 1 Sat 0028 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night I Dry Improper Passing Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 135 5 55 78 51 2 23 5 2 8 0 2 2 25 0 1 Percent 3,70% 40,74% 57,78% 37.78% 3,48% 17.04% 3,70% 1,48% 5,93% 0,00% 1.48% 1,48% 18,52% 0,00% 0,74% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 90 45 17 118 53 18 1 1 5 2 0 2 3 12 0 Percent 1 66.67% 1 33.33% 1 12.59% 1 87.41% 1 39.26% 1 13.33% 1 0.74% 1 0.74% 1 3,70% 1 1,48% 1 0.00% 1 1.48% 1 2.22% 1 8.8996 1 0,00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 19,930 SPOT CRASH RATE: 18.558 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 6.153 01/02/17 Mon 0926 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 22.925 01/04/17 Wed 1827 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 12.458 01/07/17 Sat 1129 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 15.441 01/11/17 Wed 1849 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner S 24.517 01/12/17 Thu 2036 Ran into Water/Canal 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 0.531 01/13/17 Fri 1245 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 7 5.294 01/14/17 Sat 1530 Angle 0 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 8 22.429 01/20/17 Fri 1945 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 9 19.500 01/21/17 Sat 1800 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 10 26.012 01/23/17 Mon 1151 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 11 0.455 01/23/17 Mon 1606 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 23.592 01/28/17 1 Sat 2100 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 20.914 02/OS/17 Sun 1230 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 14 0.000 02/11/17 Sat 1832 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 15 0.000 02/13/17 Mon 1838 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 5.162 02/14/17 Tue 1308 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 0.189 02/16/17 Thu 2015 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 18 22.467 02/18/17 Sat 1315 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 25.997 02/19/17 Sun 1726 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 20 0.000 02/21/17 Tue 1810 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Swerved Or Avoided 21 16.366 02/21/17 Tue 1450 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 0.065 02/22/17 Wed 1127 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Ran Red Light 23 25.560 02/25/17 Sat 0620 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 24 11.608 03/04/17 Sat 0310 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 0.000 03/05/17 Sun 0917 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 26 16.442 03/13/17 Mon 2316 Struck by Falling/Shifting Cargo 0 0 1 Night Wet No Contributing Action 27 26.255 03/13/17 Mon 1120 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 28 23.592 03/14/17 Tue 0000 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 29 5.196 03/14/17 Tue 2300 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 23.092 03/14/17 Tue 1250 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 19.972 03/15/17 Wed 0923 0.000 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 32 25.997 03/16/17 Thu 2051 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 33 10.114 03/22/17 Wed 0948 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 34 21.463 03/22/17 Wed 1220 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 35 10.303 03/23/17 Thu 1701 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 36 6.162 03/23/17 Thu 0725 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 37 15.342 03/24/17 Fri 1410 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 38 24.517 03/24/17 Fri 1635 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 39 23.981 03/28/17 Tue 1600 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 22.357 03/30/17 Thu 1525 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 0.174 04/01/17 Sat 1920 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 16.877 04/OS/17 Wed 1645 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 25.247 04/1S/17 Sat 1108 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 20.449 04/15/17 Sat 1617 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4S 3.395 04/20/17 Thu 0824 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 0.067 04/22/17 Sat 1910 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Followed too Closely 47 0.447 04/2S/17 Tue 1205 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 48 21.490 04/26/17 Wed 12SS Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 16.675 04/26/17 Wed 1454 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 50 0.065 04/27/17 Thu 0746 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 51 1.411 05/08/17 Mon 1626 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 52 18.283 05/09/17 Tue 1938 Guardrail End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 53 0.317 05/09/17 Tue 2000 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 54 4.164 05/12/17 Fri 1513 Work Zone/Maintenance Equip. 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 6.574 05/15/17 Mon 1101 Head-On 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 56 25.297 05/20/17 Sat 1318 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 26.101 05/24/17 Wed 1107 Animal 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 58 0.063 05/31/17 Wed 0808 Curb 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 59 0.550 05/31/17 Wed 1430 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 15.448 06/02/17 Fri 1345 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 61 0.093 06/02/17 Fri 1405 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 62 16.839 06/06/17 Tue 1830 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 25.445 06/06/17 Tue 0740 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 0.068 06/06/17 Tue 0940 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 26.001 06/06/17 Tue 1245 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 66 23.975 06/10/17 Sat 1400 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Off Roadway 67 18.446 06/11/17 Sun 1730 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 68 15.353 06/12/17 Mon 1930 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 69 0.065 06/13/17 Tue 1315 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 12.339 06/20/17 Tue 1720 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 71 13.818 06/24/17 Sat 0025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 72 25.902 06/29/17 Thu 1807 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 73 7.460 06/29/17 Thu 1650 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 74 20.547 06/30/17 Fri 1218 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7S 23.592 07/08/17 Sat 0912 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 76 5.948 07/08/17 Sat 12SS Rear-End 0 4 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 77 0.409 07/15/17 Sat 2259 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 78 23.592 07/17/17 Mon 0435 Guardrail Face 0 0 1 Ni ht Dr Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 79 5.474 07/20/17 Thu 0928 Rear-End 0 1 0 Da 5 r Careless or Negligent Manner State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2017 TO 12/2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 80 12.434 07/23/17 Sun 0340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 81 1.570 07/26/17 Wed 1352 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 82 16.451 07/28/17 Fri 0020 Guardrail End 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 83 8.022 07/31/17 Mon 1501 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Followed too Closely 84 0.000 08/01/17 Tue 2243 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Swerved Or Avoided 85 22.802 08/02/17 Wed 2110 Fence 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 20.433 08/08/17 Tue 0916 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 87 2S.9S0 08/09/17 Wed 1400 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Followed too Closely 88 26.329 08/10/17 Thu 1630 Rear-End 0 4 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 89 16.877 08/13/17 Sun 0930 Embankment 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 90 24.517 08/15/17 Tue 0837 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 91 10.523 08/21/17 Mon 0100 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 92 1 3.422 08/23/17 1 Wed 2042 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 93 22.211 09/O1/17 Fri 0911 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Wet No Contributing Action 94 0.763 09/02/17 Sat 2040 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 9S 18.175 09/04/17 Mon 1905 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day I Dry Ran Off Roadway 96 5.863 09/05/17 Tue 0801 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 97 21.981 09/17/17 Sun 0834 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 98 14.818 09/20/17 Wed 1412 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 19.990 09/22/17 Fri 1041 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 100 5.803 09/25/17 Mon 2209 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 101 0.093 09/25/17 Mon 1054 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 102 22.458 09/28/17 Thu 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Followed too Closely 103 17.652 10/02/17 Mon 1543 Jackknife 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 104 22.348 10/06/17 Fri 1550 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 105 0.763 10/07/17 Sat 1800 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 106 4.264 10/08/17 Sun 1920 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 0.065 10/09/17 Mon 1758 Left-Turn 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 108 25.974 10/10/17 Tue 1043 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 25.540 10/10/17 Tue 2031 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 21.711 10/11/17 Wed 0355 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 111 0.000 10/20/17 Fri 1115 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 112 16.858 10/20/17 Fri 1309 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 113 5.313 10/21/17 Sat 0721 Concrete Traffic Barrier 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 21.911 10/21/17 Sat 1127 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 115 26.186 10/21/17 Sat 1505 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 116 26.327 10/24/17 Tue 1001 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 0.542 10/24/17 Tue 2127 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 118 17.709 10/27/17 Fri 1310 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Ran Off Roadway 119 25.940 10/28/17 Sat 1442 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 22.590 11/01/17 Wed 1554 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 121 23.724 11/03/17 Fri 1420 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 22.202 11/13/17 Mon 1555 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 25.741 11/19/17 Sun 1830 Angle 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 124 0.531 11/20/17 Mon 1039 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 12S 10.691 11/20/17 Mon 0742 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 126 6.412 11/21/17 Tue 1151 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 127 2.499 11/22/17 Wed 0850 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 128 18.465 11/22/17 Wed 1400 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 129 22.192 11/2S/17 Sat 2331 Other Non-Collision 0 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 130 3.499 11/28/17 Tue 0937 Thrown or Falling Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 131 4.264 11/30/17 Thu 1558 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 132 15.481 12/02/17 Sat 0555 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 133 26.006 12/03/17 Sun 1915 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 134 10.523 12/04/17 Mon 1600 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Day Dry I No Contributing Action 135 20.509 12/09/17 Sat 1850 Tree(Standing) 0 2 0 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 136 24.517 12/11/17 Mon 0848 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 137 5.474 12/12/17 Tue 1531 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 138 25.921 12/13/17 Wed 1633 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 139 1.461 12/15/17 Fri 0732 Not Coded 0 1 4 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 3.395 12/15/17 Fri 0749 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 141 12.320 12/16/17 Sat 2256 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 142 12.434 12/19/17 Tue 1550 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 143 0.554 12/21/17 Thu 1457 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 144 9.873 12/21/17 Thu 1457 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 145 25.999 12/21/17 Thu 1548 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 26.186 12/24/17 Sun 1345 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 147 26.548 12/25/17 Mon 1108 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 148 10.303 12/21/17 Mon 1951 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 149 12.589 12/25/17 Mon 1408 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 149 2 69 78 58 1 13 2 2 9 0 7 2 25 1 9 Percent 1.34% 46.31% 52.35% 38.93% 0.67% 8.72% 1.34% 1.34% 6.04% 0.00% 4.70% 1.34% 16.78% 0.67% 6.04% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Errati77 Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 115 34 12 137 63 15 0 2 2 0 0 0 6 17 0 Percent 77.18% 22.82% 8.05% 91.95% 42.28% 10.07% 0.00% 1.34% 1.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.03% 11.41% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 19,930 SPOT CRASH RATE: 18.558 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 0.550 01/07/18 Sun 1015 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 0.387 01/12/18 Fri 1744 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 3 18.454 01/13/18 Sat 0245 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Wet Ran Stop Sign 4 21.477 01/13/18 Sat 1435 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 5 26.484 01/14/18 Sun 1830 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 6 6.061 01/15/18 Mon 1338 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 7 5.662 01/20/18 Sat 0105 Embankment 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 8 16.497 01/26/18 Fri 0515 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 9 0.548 01/26/18 Fri 1705 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 17.690 01/26/18 Fri 0903 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 2.499 01/29/18 Mon 1047 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet No Contributing Action 12 12.429 01/30/18 Tue 1718 Guardrail Face 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 13.395 01/31/18 Wed 0155 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 14 9.806 02/O1/18 Thu 1509 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 15 20.657 02/O1/18 Thu 1824 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 16 19.953 02/02/18 Fri 1330 Other Fixed Object o 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 17 3.395 02/04/18 Sun 015O Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 18 14.723 02/05/18 Mon 1037 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 26.485 02/07/18 Wed 1210 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 20 18.194 02/09/18 Fri 0720 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 21 15.353 02/11/18 Sun 0720 Angle 0 1 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 5.285 02/15/18 Thu 2346 Rear-End 0 2 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 16.727 02/16/18 Fri 1353 Ditch 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 26.092 02/19/18 Mon 1658 Rear-End 0 5 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 11.401 02/19/18 Mon 1103 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 26 25.921 02/21/18 Wed 1610 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 27 17.878 02/24/18 Sat 2135 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 28 17.466 02/26/18 Mon 0747 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 0.763 02/28/18 Wed 0706 Angle 0 1 1 0 Da Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 23.990 03/03/18 Sat 2022 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.074 03/03/18 Sat 1158 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 32 5.173 03/08/18 Thu 0719 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 9.995 03/08/18 Thu 0901 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 4.405 03/09/18 Fri 1439 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 35 17.122 03/11/18 Sun 1822 Other Non-Collision 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 6.162 03/13/18 Tue 2010 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 37 22.394 03/14/18 Wed 1003 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 38 26.485 03/17/18 Sat 1532 Rear-End 0 1 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 39 16.695 03/21/18 Wed 0643 Animal 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 40 0.782 03/22/18 Thu 0759 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 0.470 03/23/18 Fri 1302 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 42 12.958 03/24/18 Sat 1730 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 43 3.395 03/26/18 Mon 0722 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Unknown Other Not Coded 44 26.348 03/28/18 Wed 1029 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4S 20.913 03/30/18 Fri 2328 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 10.444 03/31/18 Sat 1932 Left-Turn 0 4 0 1 Night Dry I Im pro per Turn 47 24.517 04/02/18 Mon 1532 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 0.084 04/02/18 Mon 0520 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 0.550 04/03/18 Tue 0703 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 50 12.459 04/10/18 Tue 0830 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 51 18.446 04/10/18 Tue 2050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 52 0.065 04/15/18 Sun 1947 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 53 0.607 04/17/18 Tue 1710 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Da Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 0.550 04/19/18 Thu 1835 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 55 1 2.499 04/23/18 1 Mon 0224 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 56 0.065 04/24/18 Tue 1652 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 20.490 04/25/18 Wed 1600 Angle 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 58 21.477 04/25/18 Wed 1105 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 59 1.461 05/01/18 Tue 1137 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 5.798 05/08/18 Tue 0712 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 61 16.934 05/09/18 Wed 0729 Rear-End 0 1 3 0 1 Day Dry I Followed too Closely 62 0.396 05/15/18 Tue 0806 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 16.623 05/17/18 Thu 1220 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 22.503 05/17/18 Thu 0628 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 65 12.434 05/18/18 Fri 1604 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 66 8.412 05/19/18 Sat 2047 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 67 8.412 05/19/18 Sat 2110 Rear-End 0 6 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 0.512 05/19/18 Sat 2115 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 69 1.9SS OS/21/18 Mon 1730 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 1 Day I Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 70 25.978 05/25/18 Fri 0001 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 71 18.465 06/02/18 Sat 1345 Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 72 8.912 06/05/18 Tue 2313 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 73 1.461 06/07/18 Thu 2200 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 74 6.650 06/11/18 Mon 1025 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7S 14.818 06/12/18 Tue 1452 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 76 11.401 06/12/18 Tue 0910 Parked Motor Vehicle 1 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry I Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 77 25.786 06/12/18 Tue 1335 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Da Dr No Contributing Action 78 0.381 06/13/18 Wed 1657 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 79 1 26.548 06/19/181 Tue 1 1817 1 Left-Turn 1 0 1 5 1 0 1 Day I Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90020000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 26.548 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 80 4.400 06/19/18 Tue 2115 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 81 9.931 06/20/18 Wed 1545 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 82 26.188 06/22/18 Fri 1025 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 83 16.461 06/23/18 Sat 1232 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 84 2.500 06/24/18 Sun 1644 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 85 1.461 06/24/18 Sun 1 1355 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 86 20.492 06/25/18 Mon 1700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 87 26.186 07/01/18 Sun 0057 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 88 23.981 07/02/18 Mon 1822 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 89 5.317 07/03/18 Tue 1221 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 90 22.725 07/04/18 Wed 1320 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 91 0.546 07/04/18 Wed 1220 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 92 0.550 07/05/18 Thu 1504 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 93 16.318 07/10/18 Tue 1 1006 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 94 22.939 07/11/18 Wed 1805 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 95 4.262 07/11/18 Wed 2225 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 96 25.540 07/12/18 Thu 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 97 25.969 07/12/18 Thu 1900 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 98 0.000 07/15/18 Sun 0715 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 99 26.485 07/15/19 Sun 1853 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 100 6.366 07/20/18 Fri 1535 Bridge Rail 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 101 25.255 07/21/18 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 102 21,476 07/25/18 Wed 1440 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 103 5.093 07/30/18 Mon 1340 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 104 20.518 08/02/18 Thu 1640 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 105 4.001 08/08/18 Wed 0455 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 106 1.763 08/10/18 Fri 1515 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 107 19.527 08/10/18 Fri 1818 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 108 14.018 08/13/19 Mon 0900 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 109 18.465 08/18/18 Sat 1116 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 110 25.997 08/23/18 Thu 1830 Angle 0 4 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 111 11.902 08/27/18 Mon 0040 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 112 0.065 08/30/18 Thu 2150 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 113 18.194 08/31/18 Fri 1723 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 114 4.001 09/01/18 Sat 1705 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 115 8.411 09/03/18 Mon 1952 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 116 0.387 09/04/18 Tue 2150 Other Non-Collision 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 117 0.065 09/06/18 Thu 1510 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 118 20.428 09/07/18 Fri 1512 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 119 16.881 09/11/18 Tue 0625 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 120 26.264 09/18/18 Tue 1606 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 121 13.394 09/20/18 Thu 0858 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 122 18.465 09/23/18 Sun 1445 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 123 14.666 09/25/18 Tue 0700 Animal 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 124 0.548 09/25/18 Tue 1720 Right-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 125 0.392 09/25/18 Tue 2030 Other Fixed Object 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 126 0.174 09/26/18 Wed 1946 Pedestrian 0 2 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 127 0.550 09/27/18 Thu 1519 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 128 0.763 09/28/18 Fri 1511 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 129 14.409 09/29/18 Sat 0658 Ditch 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 130 16.497 10/05/18 Fri 0636 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 131 22.802 10/06/19 Sat 2220 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Night Dry Not Coded 132 8.650 10/06/18 Sat 1612 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 133 22.802 10/09/18 Tue 0656 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 134 7.061 10/10/18 Wed 0633 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 135 0.067 10/13/18 Sat 1805 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 136 0.065 10/25/18 Thu 1625 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 137 0.763 11/O1/18 Thu 0131 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 138 26.485 11/05/18 Mon 2115 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 139 22.726 11/07/18 Wed 1845 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 140 25.997 11/09/18 Fri 1445 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 141 0.550 11/12/18 Mon 1240 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 142 17.200 11/12/18 Mon 1641 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 143 0.578 11/21/18 Wed 0515 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 144 0.065 11/22/18 Thu 1220 Curb 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 145 14.814 11/28/18 Wed 1357 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 146 20.913 12/03/18 Mon 1539 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 147 23.679 12/25/18 Tue 2020 Ditch 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 148 22.534 12/26/18 Wed 1841 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 149 25.540 12/27/18 Thu 1334 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 150 22.439 12/27/18 Thu 1257 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 151 26.484 12/27/18 Thu 1357 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 152 0.754 12/27/18 Thu 1850 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Turn 153 25.997 12/28/18 Fri 1842 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 154 25.540 12/29/18 Sat 1800 Animal 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action eless 155 5.867 12/29/18 Sat 1238 Not Coded 0 3 0 Day Dry Car or Negligent Manner 156 25.316 12/30/18 Sun 1925 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 156 1 78 77 64 0 18 11 1 10 0 5 3 21 0 8 Percent 0.64% 50.00% 49.36% 41.03% 0.00% 11.54% 7.05% 0.64% 6.41% 0.00% 3.21% 1.92% 13.46% 0.00% 5.13% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic7 Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 105 50 10 145 63 20 5 1 5 2 0 0 2 19 0 Percent 57.31% 32.05% 5.41% 92.95% 40.38% 12.82% 3.21% 0.54% 3.21% 1.28% 0.00% 0.00% 1.28% 12.18% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 19,930 1 SPOT CRASH RATE: 18.558 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90010000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 4.531 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 0.006 01/05/14 Sun 1937 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 2 0.028 01/09/14 Thu 1445 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 0.255 01/13/14 Mon 1336 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 0.671 01/17/14 Fri 1342 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 0.246 01/27/14 Mon 1012 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 6 0.179 01/29/14 Wed 2210 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 7 0.987 02/05/14 Wed 1557 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 8 0.490 02/12/14 Wed 1457 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 9 0.057 02/26/14 Wed 2005 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 10 0.094 03/08/14 Sat 1720 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 0.406 03/22/14 Sat 1030 Angle 0 1 0 Day Other Not Coded 12 0.005 03/24/14 Mon 1307 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 13 0.672 03/25/14 Tue 1352 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 14 0.000 1 04/05/14 Sat 1430 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 15 0.490 04/14/14 Mon 1700 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 0.179 04/15/14 Tue 1233 Pedestrian 0 0 1 Day Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 17 0.591 04/29/14 Tue 20SS Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 1.038 04/30/14 Wed 2037 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 19 0.591 05/07/14 Wed 0730 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 20 0.648 05/08/14 Thu 1715 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 21 0.400 05/10/14 Sat 2200 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Not Coded 22 0.347 1 05/11/14 Sun 1118 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.000 06/01/14 Sun 1849 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 0.179 06/15/14 Sun 1525 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 25 0.406 06/21/14 Sat 2010 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 26 0.444 07/03/14 Thu 1042 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 0.415 07/04/14 Fri 1415 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 28 0.004 07/06/14 Sun 1206 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 29 0.981 07/10/14 Thu 1544 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 1.036 1 07/11/14 Fri 2112 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.605 07/13/14 Sun 1929 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 0.931 07/13/14 Sun 2055 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 33 0.760 07/19/14 Sat 2322 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Wet Not Coded 34 0.242 07/26/14 Sat 1430 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 0.490 07/28/14 Mon 1308 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 36 0.670 08/02/14 Sat 0023 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 37 0.705 08/OS/14 Tue 1514 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Not Coded 38 0.591 1 08/05/14 Tue 0715 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 39 0.165 08/17/14 Sun 0144 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 40 0.094 08/24/14 Sun 1402 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 41 0.406 08/25/14 Mon 1725 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 42 1.015 09/07/14 Sun 0030 Head-On 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 1.021 09/12/14 Fri 1332 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 44 0.784 09/15/14 Mon 0945 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 45 0.582 09/20/14 Sat 1932 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 0.784 1 09/25/14 Thu 2104 Angle 0 1 0 1 Night Wet Ran Red Light 47 0.141 10/06/14 Mon 2244 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 1.046 10/07/14 Tue 0009 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry I Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 0.591 10/09/14 Thu 1724 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 50 0.406 10/09/14 Thu 1724 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-of-Way 51 0.179 10/18/14 Sat 1702 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 52 1.002 11/08/14 Sat 0242 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 0.619 11/15/14 Sat 1614 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 0.179 1 11/19/14 Wed 1541 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 55 1.021 11/21/14 Fri 1030 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 0.993 11/25/14 Tue 1628 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 1.055 12/16/14 1 Tue 0810 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 58 0.629 12/17/14 Wed 1107 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 59 0.295 12/18/14 Thu 1516 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 60 0.092 12/23/14 Tue 1456 Sideswipe 0 1 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 60 0 33 27 15 1 11 3 0 8 0 8 1 1 0 10 Percent 0.00% 55.00% 45.00% 25.00% 1.67% 18.33% 5.00% 0.00% 13.33% 0.00% 13.33% 1.67% 1.67% 0.00% 16.67% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 42 18 6 53 22 11 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 Percent 1 70.00% 1 30.00% 1 10.00% 1 88.33% 1 36.67% 1 18.33% 1 0.00% 1 5.00% 1 0.00% 1 1.67% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 8.33% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 9,307 SPOT CRASH RATE: 17.662 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90010000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 4.531 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2015 TO 12/2015 COUNTY: Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.578 01/16/15 Fri 1516 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dr Followed too Closely 2 0.674 01/18/15 Sun 0036 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 3 0.490 01/20/15 Tue 1534 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 4 0.038 01/26/15 Mon 1900 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 5 0.402 01/26/15 Mon 1559 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 0.094 01/27/15 Tue 2110 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 7 0.490 01/31/15 Sat 1721 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 0.490 02/15/15 Sun 0422 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 9 0.591 02/21/15 Sat 0821 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Passing 10 0.094 03/03/15 Tue 1428 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 11 1.058 03/08/15 Sun 0044 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 12 0.094 03/14/15 Sat 0131 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 13 0.542 03/15/15 Sun 1033 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 1.021 03/19/15 Thu 1159 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 0.784 03/21/15 Sat 1649 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 16 0.672 03/22/15 Sun 2126 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 0.672 047O1/15 Wed 1101 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 18 0.094 04/04/15 Sat 1845 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 19 0.542 1 04/07/15 Tue 1100 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 20 0.493 1 04/11/15 Sat 1020 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 21 0.490 1 04/17/15 Fri 1318 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 22 0.490 1 04/17/15 Fri 1218 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 23 1.055 1 04/20/15 Mon 1700 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 24 0.255 1 04/27/15 Mon 1126 Culvert 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 0.490 1 05/05/15 Tue 1225 Left-Turn 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 1.055 05/09/15 Sat 1448 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 0.591 05/27/15 Wed 1855 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 28 0.591 06/17/15 Wed 1715 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 1.021 06/21/15 Sun 2306 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 30 0.490 06/28/15 Sun 1515 Not Coded 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 31 0.788 07/03/15 Fri 2222 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Passing 32 0.434 07/08/15 Wed 1157 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 33 0.000 07/10/15 Fri 1144 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 34 0.333 07/16/15 Thu 1226 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 35 0.490 07/29/15 Wed 1541 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 0.537 08/15/15 Sat 2021 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 0.606 08/23/15 Sun 1037 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 38 0.591 08/26/15 Wed 0651 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Red Light 39 0.491 09/O1/15 Tue 1612 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 40 0.000 09/30/15 Wed 1242 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 41 1.021 10/01/15 Thu 1649 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 42 0.098 10/09/15 Fri 1322 Curb 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 0.096 10/15/15 Thu 1315 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 44 0.891 10/15/15 Thu 2343 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 45 0.765 10/20/15 Tue 1109 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 0.885 10/24/15 Sat 1553 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 47 0.940 10/25/15 Sun 0028 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 0.085 10/31/15 Sat 1559 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 49 0.047 11/09/15 Mon 1425 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 50 0.490 11/13/15 Fri 1925 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Improper Backing 51 0.490 11/21/15 Sat 1347 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 52 0.991 11/29/15 Sun 0358 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 53 0.991 11/29/15 Sun 0412 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 0.000 12/14/15 Mon 1701 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 1.098 12/21/15 Mon 1456 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 56 0.798 12/24/15 Thu 1833 Rear-End 1 0 1 1 0 17N7ghtl Dry Followed too Closely 57 0.094 12/31/15 Thu 1527 Pedalcycle 0 3 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Parked Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Car Object Water Other 57 0 32 25 12 0 13 3 0 1 0 9 8 5 0 3 Percent 0.00% 56.14% 43.86% 21.05% 0.00% 22.81% 5.26% 0.00% 1.75% 0.00% 15.79% 14.04% 8.7791 0.00% 5.26% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 40 17 1 56 18 6 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 Percent 1 70.18% 1 29.82% 1 1.75% 98.25% 1 31.58% 1 10.53% 1 1.75% 3.51% 1 0.00% 1 3.51% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 1 8.77% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 11,218 SPOT CRASH RATE: 13.921 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90010000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 4.531 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2016 TO 12 2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.985 01/12/16 Tue 0022 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 2 0.784 01/16/16 Sat 1907 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Night Wet Ran Red Light 3 0.490 01/20/16 Wed 1401 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 4 0.488 01/23/16 Sat 2030 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 5 0.000 01/26/16 Tue 0754 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 6 0.591 02/03/16 Wed 1530 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 0.940 02/08/16 Mon 1145 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 8 0.486 02/09/16 Tue 1943 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 9 0.490 02/10/16 Wed 0945 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 10 0.940 02/16/16 Tue 1034 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 11 1.055 02/20/16 Sat 1040 Right-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 0.940 02/21/16 Sun 2357 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 13 0.000 03/03/16 Thu 1330 Pedestrian 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 0.784 03/OS/16 Sat 1533 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 15 0.434 03/15/16 Tue 0050 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Night Dry No Contributing Action 16 0.009 03/17/16 Thu 1238 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 17 1.021 03/19/16 Sat 1757 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 0.255 03/21/16 Mon 1305 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 0.170 03/27/16 Sun OS14 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 0.179 03/27/16 Sun 1945 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 21 1.098 04/07/16 Thu 1421 Rear-End 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 0.000 04/08/16 Fri 1839 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.094 04/18/16 Mon 2028 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 0.490 04/26/16 Tue 1340 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 25 0.070 04/28/16 Thu 0741 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 26 0.689 05/01/16 Sun 0424 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 27 0.094 05/04/16 Wed 1737 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 28 0.000 05/09/16 Mon 1523 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 29 0.847 05/14/16 Sat 2100 Angle 0 3 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 30 0.378 05/18/16 Wed 0831 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry I Other Contributing Action 31 0.000 06/14/16 Tue 1140 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 32 0.089 06/19/16 Sun 2126 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 33 0.406 06/20/16 Mon 0912 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 34 0.094 06/20/16 Mon 1449 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 35 0.255 06/23/16 Thu 1928 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 36 0.591 06/25/16 Sat 1218 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 37 0.406 06/29/16 Wed 0924 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Red Light 38 0.179 07/07/16 Thu 1758 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 39 0.000 07/15/16 Fri 1910 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 40 0.038 07/16/16 Sat 2000 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 41 0.490 07/21/16 Thu 0100 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Other Other Contributing Action 42 O.S91 07/24/16 Sun 1856 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 43 0.000 07/25/16 Mon 1551 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 44 O.S42 07/31/16 Sun 1140 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 45 0.931 08/11/16 Thu 1618 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 46 0.000 08/13/16 Sat 0117 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 0.000 08/23/16 Tue 1744 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Wet Followed too Closely 48 0.501 08/24/16 Wed 1501 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 49 0.402 09/04/16 Sun 1630 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 50 0.075 09/16/16 Fri 1635 Pedestrian 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 51 0.179 09/30/16 Fri 1023 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 52 1.054 10/04/16 Tue 1549 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 53 0.421 10/05/16 Wed 1034 Curb 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 54 0.293 10/06/16 Thu 0242 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 55 0.094 10/24/16 Mon 1320 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 56 0.333 10/25/16 Tue 0035 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 57 0.987 10/27/16 Thu 0843 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 58 0.087 10/30/16 Sun 1215 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 59 1.088 11/01/16 Tue 1926 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 60 0.987 11/01/16 Tue 1624 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 61 0.926 11/02/16 Wed 0919 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 62 0.672 11/03/16 Thu 1343 Rear-End 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 63 0.406 11/04/16 Fri 1400 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 0.409 12/04/16 Sun 0211 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 0.490 12/06/16 Tue 0950 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 66 0.183 12/07/16 Wed J00 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 0.610 12/16/16 Fri 10 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 0.784 12/19/16 Mon 48 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 68 0 33 35 12 0 18 0 1 3 0 11 11 4 0 2 Percent 0.00% 48.53% 51.47% 17.65% 0.00% 26.47% 0.00% 1.47% 4.41% 0.00% 16.18% 16.18% 5.88% 0.00% 2.94% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 48 20 4 63 25 10 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 Percent 1 70.59% 1 29.41% 1 5.88% 1 92.65% 1 36.76% 1 14.71% 1 0.00% 1 4.41% 1 0.00% 1.47% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00TTT 7.35% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 9,773 IE-SPOT CRASH RATE: 19.063 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90010000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 4.531 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 0.542 01/02/17 Mon 1012 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 2 0.591 01/24/17 Tue 1140 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 3 0.000 01/24/17 Tue 1152 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 4 0.094 01/24/17 Tue 1846 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way S 0.000 02/11/17 Sat 1903 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 0.094 02/13/17 Mon 0908 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 1.021 03/11/17 Sat 1948 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 1.101 04/08/17 Sat 0130 Left-Turn 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 9 0.937 04/14/17 Fri 1630 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 10 0.490 04/30/17 Sun 1917 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 0.905 OS/03/17 Wed 1913 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 0.940 05/15/17 Mon 1345 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 13 0.179 05/17/17 Wed 1528 Pedalcycle 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 14 0.255 05/29/17 Mon 1958 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 15 0.019 06/01/17 Thu 0655 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 0.333 06/09/17 Fri 1008 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 0.000 06/11/17 Sun 1628 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 0.103 06/14/17 Wed 0955 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 19 0.295 06/18/17 Sun 1729 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Wet Swerved Or Avoided 20 0.094 06/25/17 Sun 1517 Tree(Standing) 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 0.070 07/01/17 Sat 1101 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 22 0.019 07/08/17 Sat 1726 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 23 0.482 07/09/17 Sun 1607 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 24 0.490 07/10/17 Mon 1007 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 0.094 07/14/17 Fri 1242 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 26 0.784 07/19/17 Wed 1815 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Red Light 27 0.490 07/21/17 Fri 0330 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 28 0.000 07/22/17 Sat 1612 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 29 0.088 07/30/17 Sun 1415 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 30 1.013 08/04/17 Fri 0948 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 31 0.000 08/07/17 Mon 1038 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 32 0.591 08/10/17 Thu 1825 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 33 0.591 08/14/17 Mon 0846 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Passing 34 0.949 09/04/17 Mon 2152 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 35 0.610 10/15/17 Sun 0418 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 36 1.103 10/15/17 Sun 2203 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 37 0.542 10/23/17 Mon 1150 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 38 0.075 10/25/17 Wed 1811 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 39 0.179 10/31/17 Tue 1237 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 40 0.591 11/27/17 Mon J 10 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 41 0.406 12/01/17 Fri 24 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 42 0.103 12/09/17 Sat 46 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 42 1 22 20 3 0 7 5 0 1 0 4 8 5 0 2 Percent 2.38% 52.38% 47.62% 7.14% 0.00% 16.67% 11.90% 0.00% 2.38% 0.00% 9.52% 19.05% 11.90% 0.00% 4.76% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 32 10 1 41 11 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 Percent 1 76.19% 1 23.81% 1 2.38% 1 97.62% 1 26.19% 1 11.90% 1 0.00% 1 2.38% 1 0.00% 1 2.38% 0.00% 2.38% 1 0.00% 1 9.52% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 9,773 SPOT CRASH RATE: 19.063 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90010000 STATE ROUTE: 5 INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 4.531 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2018 TO 12 2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 1.055 01/06/18 Sat 1715 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 2 0.587 01/08/18 Mon 1350 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 3 0.490 01/22/18 Mon 1259 Pedestrian 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 0.724 01/30/18 Tue 1320 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner S 0.481 02/02/18 Fri 1801 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 6 1.015 02/20/18 Tue 1958 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 7 1.088 03/30/18 Fri 1451 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 8 0.406 OS/08/18 Tue 1720 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 9 0.155 05/18/18 Fri 0930 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 10 0.828 05/18/18 Fri 1245 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 11 0.591 05/25/18 Fri 1400 Left-Turn 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 12 0.000 05/27/18 Sun 0422 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Wet Improper Passing 13 0.481 06/04/18 Mon 1937 Not Coded 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 0.274 08/06/18 Mon 0330 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 15 0.178 08/10/18 Fri 1043 Pedestrian 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 16 0.128 08/11/18 Sat 1433 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Backing 17 0.793 08/18/18 Sat 1844 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 18 0.912 09/11/18 Tue 0750 Pedalcycle 0 0 1 Day Dry No Contributing Action 19 0.000 09/26/18 Wed 1502 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 20 0.094 10/01/18 Mon 1028 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 0.094 10/02/18 Tue 1219 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 22 0.179 10/14/18 Sun 1323 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.406 10/16/18 Tue 0652 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 0.490 11/08/18 Thu 1940 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 25 0.000 11/21/18 Wed 1322 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 26 0.944 11/21/18 Wed 1721 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 27 0.094 11/25/18 Sun 1120 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 28 0.094 12/02/18 Sun 1941 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Unknown Dry Improper Backing 29 0.591 12/05/18 Wed 1043 Traffic Signal Support 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 30 0.591 12/21/18 Fri 2154 Not Coded 0 0 1 1 Night I Dry Failed To Keep In Pro -Lane Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 30 1 10 19 9 0 2 1 0 1 0 5 2 3 0 6 Percent 3.33% 33.33% 63.33% 30.00% 0.00% 6.67% 3.33% 0.00% 3.33% 0.00% 16.67% 6.67% 10.00% 0.00% 20.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 20 9 2 28 5 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 Percent 1 66.67% 1 30.00% 1 6.6791 1 93.33% 1 16.67% 1 6.67% I 3.33% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 3.33% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.009/ 1 10.009/ 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 9,773 SPOT CRASH RATE: 19.063 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90003000 STATE ROUTE: A1A INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 2.890 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2014 TO 12/2014 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE DAM NIGHT VEHICLE ONLY 1 0.000 01/01/14 Wed 1215 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 2 2.762 01/05/14 Sun 1430 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 3 2.800 01/06/14 Mon 1816 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 2.625 01/14/14 Tue 1455 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 0.000 01/24/14 Fri 1200 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 1 2.638 01/24/14 1 Fri 1711 Not Coded 0 1 1 0 Day I Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 7 0.009 01/27/14 Mon 1333 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 8 2.741 02/05/14 Wed 1056 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 9 2.741 02/07/14 Fri 1322 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 2.741 02/10/14 Mon 1834 Angle 0 2 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 11 2.611 02/14/14 Fri 1906 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 12 0.019 02/16/14 Sun 0057 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 13 0.319 02/16/14 Sun 1325 Angle 0 0 1 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 2.625 02/23/14 Sun 0051 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 15 2.888 03/07/14 Fri 0121 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 16 2.625 03/07/14 Fri 0508 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 17 2.741 03/11/14 Tue 1500 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 18 2.895 03/19/14 Wed 2327 Curb 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 0.000 03/24/14 Mon 1318 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 2.895 03/29/14 Sat 1838 Sideswipe 0 1 2 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 21 2.625 04/04/14 Fri 0049 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 22 2.254 04/24/14 Thu 2313 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 23 0.000 04/28/14 Mon 0135 Other Traffic Barrier 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 2.626 04/28/14 Mon 2059 Not Coded 0 2 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 25 2.254 05/02/14 Fri 2026 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 26 2.762 05/03/14 Sat 0006 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 27 2.625 05/21/14 Wed 1620 Not Coded 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 28 2.886 05/28/14 Wed 0005 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry I Swerved Or Avoided 29 2.741 05/30/14 Fri 1315 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 0.000 06/10/14 Tue 1735 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Other Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.000 06/18/14 Wed 2022 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 32 2.254 07/12/14 Sat 0220 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Wet Followed too Closely 33 2.623 07/15/14 Tue 1557 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 34 2.254 07/23/14 Wed 1601 Angle 0 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 35 2.625 07/2S/14 Fri 0853 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 36 2.762 08/02/14 Sat 2246 Rear-End 0 3 0 Night Wet I Careless or Negligent Manner 37 2.890 08/03/14 Sun 2226 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 38 2.645 08/04/14 Mon 1744 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 39 2.625 08/16/14 Sat 1557 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 40 0.246 08/16/14 Sat 1654 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 41 2.263 08/24/14 Sun 0423 Immersion 0 1 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 42 0.114 09/01/14 Mon 1256 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 43 2.254 09/02/14 Tue 1635 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 44 2.741 09/09/14 Tue 0700 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry I Followed too Closely 45 2.625 09/23/14 Tue 0715 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 46 1.759 10/23/14 Thu 2200 Not Coded 0 0 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 47 2.895 11/11/14 Tue 1851 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 2.625 11/18/14 Tue 1510 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 1 2.516 11/25/14 1 Tue 1110 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 50 2.625 11/25/14 Tue 1526 Rear-End 0 1 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 51 2.889 11/26/14 Wed 1619 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 52 2.726 12/02/14 Tue 1712 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 53 2.687 12/06/14 Sat 2254 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 2.886 12/08/14 Mon 1510 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 1.781 12/14/14 Sun 2200 Not Coded 0 1 0 Night Dry Disregarded other Road Markings Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 55 1 40 14 12 0 14 1 0 5 0 1 0 3 0 18 Percent 1,82% 72,73% 25,45% 21,82% 0.00% 25,45% 1,82% 0,00% 9,09% 0,00% 1,82% 0,00% 5,45% 0,00% 32,73% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Errati77 Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 31 24 7 47 20 9 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 8 0 Percent 1 56.36% 1 43.64% 1 12.73% 1 85.45% 1 36.36% 1 16.36% 1 3.64% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.005v 1 1.82% 1 3.64% 1 0.00% 1 14.55% 1 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,763 SPOT CRASH RATE: 10.949 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90003000 STATE ROUTE: A1A INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 2.890 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2015 TO 12 2015 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/ CONTRIBUTING CAUSE POST DAM NIGHT DRY VEHICLE ONLY 1 2.706 01/08/15 Thu 1529 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 2 2.800 01/09/15 Fri 1606 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely 3 2.625 01/10/15 Sat 0928 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 4 2.706 01/13/15 Tue 2014 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 5 2.741 01/15/15 Thu 1610 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 6 1 2.254 01/17/15 Sat 2033 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 7 0.549 01/20/15 Tue 1731 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 2.838 01/24/15 1 Sat 1130 Other Non-Collision 0 1 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 9 2.741 01/27/15 Tue 0945 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 10 2.254 02/03/15 Tue 0828 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 11 2.706 02/03/15 Tue 1515 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 12 2.890 02/18/15 Wed 1720 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 13 0.000 02/21/15 Sat 0130 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 14 2.254 02/23/15 Mon 0849 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 15 2.629 03/05/15 Thu 2028 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 16 1 2.632 03/07/15 Sat 2117 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 2.644 03/09/15 Mon 2242 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 2.819 03/10/15 Tue 1643 Overturn/Rollover 0 I 1 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 2.750 03/11/15 Wed 1331 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 20 0.284 03/12/15 Thu 1259 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 21 2.743 03/12/15 Thu 1710 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 22 2.876 03/13/15 Fri 1651 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 23 0.189 03/13/15 Fri 2100 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 24 0.208 03/14/15 Sat 0700 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Night Dry Improper Turn 25 1 2.683 1 03/15/15 Sun 1020 Traffic Sign Support 0 0 1 Day Dry I Careless or Negligent Manner 26 2.633 03/19/15 Thu 1714 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 2.254 03/21/15 Sat 2023 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 28 2.886 03/21/15 Sat 1252 Sideswipe 0 1 1 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 29 2.706 03/30/15 Mon 1601 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 30 2.611 04/O1/15 Wed 1643 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.000 04/10/15 Fri 1608 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 32 0.568 04/11/15 Sat 0200 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 33 2.254 04/23/15 1 Thu 0809 Angle 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 34 0.473 04/25/15 Sat 1654 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 35 0.000 05/03/15 Sun 1123 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 36 2.625 05/04/15 Mon 1621 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 37 2.625 05/07/15 Thu 1443 Not Coded 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 0.114 05/07/15 Thu 1915 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 1 0 Night Dry Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 39 2.741 05/08/15 Fri 1203 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 40 2.892 05/21/15 Thu 1137 Curb 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 41 2.625 05/22/15 1 Fri 2314 Rear-End 0 4 0 Night Dry Exceed Posted Speed 42 1.461 05/24/15 Sun 1214 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 43 2.256 06/03/15 Wed 2000 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 44 2.895 06/22/15 Mon 1530 Pedalcycle 0 3 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 45 2.616 06/26/15 Fri 1439 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 46 0.000 07/04/15 Sat 2300 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 3 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 47 2.741 07/14/15 Tue 0850 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 48 2.741 07/20/15 Mon 1621 Angle 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 2.889 07/26/15 Sun 1424 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 50 0.284 08/06/15 1 Thu 0330 Not Coded 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 51 0.379 08 11 15 Tue 1330 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 2.258 08/14/15 Fri 1738 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day I Dry Not Coded 53 1.518 08/19/15 Wed 1643 Pedalcycle 0 2 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 2.676 08/26/15 Wed 1124 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 55 2.254 09/13/15 Sun 1507 Angle 0 1 1 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 56 1.461 09/14/15 Mon 0130 Curb T 0 Night Dr Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 57 1.000 09/16/15 Wed 1733 Curb 0 Da D Other Contributing Action 58 2.625 09/20/15 Sun 1520 Curb 1 Da Dr Drove too Fast for Conditions 59 1.332 09/29/15 Tue 1029 Curb 0 Da D Careless or Negligent Manner 60 2.895 09/30/15 Wed 1714 Pedalcycle 1 Da Dr No Contributing Action 61 0.189 10/03/15 Sat 1948 Parked Motor Vehicle 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 62 1.696 10/06/15 Tue 1613 Guardrail Face 0 Da Dr Careless or Negligent Manner 63 0.000 10/08/15 Thu 1300 Overturn/Rollover 0 Da D Over-Correcting/Over-Steering 64 2.254 10/11/15 Sun 2314 Curb 1 NightDry Careless or Negligent Manner 65 2.254 10/19/15 Mon 1741 Angle 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 66 2.256 10/22/15 Thu 2105 Rear-End 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 67 2.886 10/22/15 Thu 2000 Rear-End 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 68 0.095 10/27/15 Tue 1339 Pedalcycle 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 69 2.881 10/31/15 Sat 2258 Sideswipe 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 2.760 11/05/15 Thu 0912 Pedalcycle 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 712254 11/25/15 Wed 2325 Curb 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 72 2.625 12/10/15 Thu 2123 Left-Turn 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 73 2.703 12/11/15 Fri 1349 Rear-End 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Parked Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Car Object Water Other 73 1 53 20 12 0 18 1 0 5 0 9 1 13 0 4 Percent 1.37% 72.60% 27.40% 16.44% 0.00% 24.66% 1.37% 0.00% 6.85% 0.00% 12.33% 1.37% 17.81% 0.00% 5.4811 Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Cntl Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 49 24 4 69 29 13 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 30 0 Percent 67.12% 32.88% 5.48% 94.52% 39.73% 17.81% 1.37% 0.00% 4.11% 0.00% 0.00% 1.37% 0.00% 13.70% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 12,315 1 SPOT CRASH RATE: 16.240 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90003000 STATE ROUTE: A1A INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 2.890 ENGINEER:CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2016 TO 12/2016 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/ WET/ CONTRIBUTING CAUSE POST DAM NIGHT DRY VEHICLE ONLY 1 2.781 01/05/16 Tue 1604 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 2 0.004 01/07/16 Thu 1432 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcti ng/Ove r-Stee ring 3 1.298 01/14/16 Thu 2222 Rear-End 0 2 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 4 0.000 01/23/16 Sat 1430 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 2.886 02/03/16 Wed 1814 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 2.741 02/05/16 Fri 1750 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 7 1.284 02/08/16 Mon 2018 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 8 2.798 02/11/16 Thu 0810 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 9 2.636 02/18/16 Thu 1208 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 10 2.741 02/20/16 Sat 2345 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 11 2.629 03/04/16 Fri 0940 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Ran Stop Sign 12 2.737 03/04/16 Fri 1653 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 13 0.047 03/04/16 Fri 1009 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 14 2.254 03/07/16 Mon 0745 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 15 2.268 03/12/16 Sat 1111 Curb 0 0 1 Day Wet Drove too Fast for Conditions 16 2.624 03/12/16 Sat 1438 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 17 2.625 03/17/16 Thu 1404 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 18 0.284 03/20/16 Sun 2341 Angle 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 2.159 03/23/16 Wed 1412 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 20 2.741 03/24/16 Thu 1642 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 21 2.742 03/26/16 Sat 2112 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Followed too Closely 22 2.625 04/02/16 Sat 2018 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 23 2.634 04/14/16 Thu 0140 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 0.057 05/01/16 Sun 1424 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 25 2.516 05/13/16 Fri 1656 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 26 2.741 05/16/16 Mon 1630 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 0.905 05/22/16 Sun 1644 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 28 2.895 05/23/16 Mon 2120 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 0 1 Ni ht Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 2.895 06/03/16 Fri 2048 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Night Dry No Contributing Action 30 2.723 06/07/16 Tue 1112 Jackknife 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 31 0.009 06/10/16 Fri 1340 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Improper Turn 32 2.683 06/18/16 Sat 1517 Rear-End 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 33 2.889 06/18/16 Sat 1517 Sideswipe 0 3 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 34 1.303 06/26/16 Sun 0555 Utility Pole/Light Support 0 1 0 Night Dry Ran Off Roadway 35 0.000 06/30/16 Thu 1030 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Other No Contributing Action 36 0.019 07/01/16 Fri 1510 Overturn/Rollover 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 37 2.706 07/03/16 Sun 1908 Rear-End 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 38 2.732 07/04/16 Mon 1544 Tree(Standing) 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 39 1.970 07/05/16 Tue 2220 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 40 0.000 07/13/16 Wed 1033 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 41 2.625 07/16/16 Sat 0320 Other Post,Pole Or Support 0 1 0 Night Wet Ran Off Roadway 42 2.741 07/21/16 Thu 2215 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 43 0.379 07/22/16 Fri 0201 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 44 2.065 07/25/16 Mon 1737 Rear-End 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn 45 0.014 08/O1/16 Mon 1655 Not Coded 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 46 2.895 08/05/16 Fri 1300 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 47 1.095 08/13/16 Sat 1700 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 48 2.254 08/16/16 Tue 0730 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 49 2.886 08/20/16 Sat 1545 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 50 2.800 08/24/16 Wed 1434 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Wet Other Contributing Action 51 2.502 08/29/16 Mon 2255 Curb 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 52 2.706 09/01/16 Thu 1550 Head-On 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 53 1.288 09/03/16 Sat 0232 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 54 2.620 09/14/16 Wed 1906 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 55 2.311 09/24/16 Sat 2246 Curb 0 0 1 Night Wet Careless or Negligent Manner 56 2.254 09/25/16 Sun 1955 Angle 0 0 1 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 57 2.741 10/03/16 Mon 0725 Angle 0 1 0 Day Wet Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 58 2.625 10/13/16 Thu 1127 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcti ng/Ove r-Stee ring 59 2.745 10/20/16 Thu 1050 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 60 2.625 11/04/16 Fri 0352 Curb 0 1 0 Ni ht Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 61 2.895 11/07/16 Mon 1400 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 62 2.625 11/10/16 Thu 1822 Left-Turn 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 63 0.000 11/10/16 Thu 1336 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 64 2.742 11/18/16 Fri 1504 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 65 1.686 11/19/16 Sat 1505 Guardrail Face 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcti ng/Ove r-Stee ring 66 2.639 11/20/16 Sun 1610 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry Over-Correcti ng/Ove r-Stee ring 67 2.639 12/03/16 Sat 0834 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 68 2.891 12/06/16 Tue 2036 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 69 2.892 12/11/16 Sun 0247 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 70 2.857 12/27/16 Tue 1601 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day I Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Parked Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Red/Bike Car Object Water Other 70 1 38 32 18 1 7 2 0 6 0 10 3 12 0 3 Percent 1.43% 54.2991 45.71% 25.71% 1.43% 10.00% 2.86% 0.00% 8.57% 0.00% 14.29% 4.29% 17.14% 0.00% 4.29% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Cntl Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 47 23 5 64 2S 10 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 6 0 Percent 67.14% 32.86% 7.141 91.43Y 35.71% 14.29% 2.861 0.00% 1.431 0.00% 0.00% 1.431 2.86% 8.571 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES SPOT CRASH RATE: 14.372 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,344 State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90003000 STATE ROUTE: A1A INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 2.890 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1 2017 TO 12 2017 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.800 01/11/17 Wed 1234 Left-Turn 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 2 1.433 01/21/17 Sat 1533 Not Coded 1 0 Day Dry Erratic,Reckless or Aggressive 3 2.254 01/25/17 Wed 1308 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 4 2.625 02/01/17 Wed 1727 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 5 0.189 02/10/17 Fri 0727 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 6 2.623 02/11/17 Sat 1934 Rear-End 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 7 2.254 02/28/17 Tue 1947 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Night Dry Not Coded 8 0.009 03/04/17 Sat 1356 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 9 2.684 03/06/17 Mon 1717 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 10 2.625 03/10/17 Fri 0030 Rear-End 0 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 11 1.000 03/15/17 Wed 1923 Rear-End 0 0 1 Day Dry Followed too Closely 12 2.743 03/20/17 Mon 1140 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 13 2.254 03/21/17 Tue 1845 Angle 0 1 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 14 0.000 03/24/17 Fri 0412 Other Fixed Object 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 15 2.554 03/28/17 Tue 1213 Overturn/Rollover 0 1 0 Day Dry No Contributing Action 16 2.895 04/03/17 Mon 0853 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 17 1.726 05/02/17 Tue 0329 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 18 0.250 05/14/17 Sun 1210 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 19 2.895 05/27/17 Sat 1250 Not Coded 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 20 0.000 05/31/17 Wed 0522 Other Non-Collision 0 1 0 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 21 2.740 06/01/17 Thu 1159 Rear-End 0 2 1 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 22 0.000 06/02/17 Fri 1817 Other Non-Fixed Object 0 2 0 Day Dry Drove too Fast for Conditions 23 0.189 06/14/17 Wed 1742 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 24 2.886 06/28/17 Wed 1700 Pedalcycle 0 1 0 Day Dry Not Coded 25 2.895 07/02/17 Sun 1025 Not Coded 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 26 2.741 07/OS/17 Wed 1903 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 27 1.488 07/09/17 Sun 1528 Angle 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 28 0.284 07/11/17 Tue 2021 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Night Dry Careless or Negligent Manner 29 2.254 07/26/17 Wed 1757 Curb 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 30 0.019 07/28/17 Fri 1752 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 31 2.891 07/31/17 Mon 1350 Sideswipe 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 32 2.574 08/04/17 Fri 1435 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 33 2.741 08/21/17 Mon 1154 Angle 0 0 1 Day Dry Failed to Yield Right-Of-Way 34 2.606 08/22/17 Tue 0824 Bridge Rail 0 0 1 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 35 2.292 08/24/17 Thu 1452 Ran into Water/Canal 0 3 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 36 1.497 11/15/17 Wed 0441 Curb 1 0 1 1 1 0 Night Dry Other Contributing Action 37 0.284 12/16/17 Sat 1600 Parked Motor Vehicle 0 0 1 Day Dry Not Coded 38 2.857 12/17/17 Sun 1513 Overturn/Rollover 0 2 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 39 2.895 12/18/17 Mon 0117 Curb 0 1 0 Night Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 40 0.142 12/27/17 Wed 1041 Sideswipe 0 2 0 Day Dry Improper Turn Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 40 1 26 14 4 0 9 1 0 5 0 1 3 8 1 3 Percent 2.50% 65.00% 35.00% 10.00% 0.00% 22.50% 2.50% 0.00% 12.50% 0.00% 2.50% 7.50% 20.00% 2.50% 7.50% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 31 9 0 40 8 8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 Percent 1 77.50% 1 22.50% 1 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 2.50% 1 0.00% 1 2.50% 1 0.00% 0.00% 2.50% 1 0.00% 1 12.50% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,344 SPOT CRASH RATE: 14.372 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES State of Florida Department of Transportation CRASH SUMMARY SECTION: 90003000 STATE ROUTE: A1A INTERSECTING ROADWAY: None M.P. 0.000 TO 2.890 ENGINEER: CG STUDY PERIOD: FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2018 COUNTY:Monroe No. MILE POST DATE DAY TIME CRASH TYPE FATAL INJURIES PROP DAY/DAM NIGHT WET/DRY CONTRIBUTING CAUSE (VEHICLE ONLY) 1 2.568 02/21/18 Wed 1512 Curb 0 1 0 Day Dry Failed To Keep In Proper Lane 2 0.000 04/11/18 Wed 0836 Fell/Jumped from Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 Day Dry Other Contributing Action 3 1.815 05/27/18 Sun 1504 Sideswipe 0 1 0 Day Dry Followed too Closely 4 2.800 07/30/18 Mon 2344 Rear-End 0 0 Night Dry Followed too Closely S 1.215 07/31/18 Tue 1528 Overturn/Rollover 0 3 0 Day Dry Careless or Negligent Manner Backed Fixed Ran into Total No. Fatal Injury PDO Rear-End Head-On Angle Left-Turn Right-Turn Sideswipe Into Ped/Bike Parked Car Object Water Other 5 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent 20.00% 80.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% Contrib. Careless Improper Ran Red Exceeded Improper Disreg Cntl Erratic/ Ran off Wrong Cause Day Night Wet Dry Driving FTYRW Turn Light Speed Passing Dev Aggress Road DUI Way Total 4 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 1 80.00% 1 20.00% 1 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 20.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% TOTAL ENTERING VEHICLES/ADT: 13,344 SPOT CRASH RATE: 14.372 CRASHES PER MILLION ENTERING VEHICLES FDOT High Crash List Maps O t� 11 rz _ t l+u tV V j r7F i� 35 �S z� ,up S r:7 1, r c r 1� y °r' e Al t LA'h, N", gA, 'P5 4"Y , Py vemier 00, 051,11,11-1111, $0, Bg A v, I"v,""f"I 4 Or 'oe ��1 t� " ;k �� 'i�� 44 �Fi �� �,4 {� ;+ ,; �,. �° �� f ��'r' ?p I�� �f�I �� �'1 lm �r� ��� ��� :� ��5 �� U� �, 7` ,,, t ���� ,4 �4 is ���,,, `r1; ��tr �4� t� ��f t,'�,� gyp' {j �, �� r� �� t>a k � h` t tl i ai fr: LY - d i r .dace v y. �t r V j r7F if 35 �S z{� 4 Mf ,A.r S r:7 7 .r 1' 1� y °r' t Fatal Crash Location Maps 107 , h1 105 MM , 3 "�104 MM 103 MM 1t)2 MM ''101 M M Ap 100 MM 99 M s MM 2 97 M; r96 MM 3 � '95 MM `=94 M 93 VIM 1MM 2 90 MM d89 X ,, "88 MM ,g i mM 5 MM 4 MM 11 3 M 2 0 MM �P9 MM 5 MM 77 M Z 76 MM 75 I-A ,,. ' 4 MM A111173 MM' 72.MM AC0M Miles 0 ' 1 2 4 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FDOT District 6 A Mile Markers Fatal Crashes Basemap Routes Years 2014 to 2018 Upper Keys (Key Largo) Fatal Crashes )1 F ti 71 MM 70 MM 68 MM , 67 MM 66 MM 1 65 64 MM 63 MM 62 MM 1 61MM 60 MM 1 59 MM ' 58MM i 57MM 56 MM VN n 1 �! 55 53 MM 2 1 52 MM " 51MM 1 50 MM 49 MM 48MM MM �t 46MM 45 MM 2 44 MM 1 43MM 42MM �p 41 MM 1 40 MM MM 38 MM 1 37 MM 36 MM �r!t Miles COM 34 MM A 0 1 2 4 6 { FDOT District 6 A Mile Markers Fatal Crashes Basemap Routes 40 ",,"I Years 2014 to 2018 Mid Keys (Marathon) Fatal Crashes IVIIVI M " 30 MM 1 2 Z 29 MM M 1 2 27 MM 26 MM ` k 25 1 1 24'MM 23 MM �4R 2 MM 1 21MM' 20MM 19 mm 'a 18 MM # 17 MM 1 4: 1 16 MM 1 MM 14 MM 13 MM 12 MM 11MM f�4 9 MM MM 1 1 � 6M MM 1 M 3M1 1 MM' 4 1 1 MM 1 3 /� ' Miles AC0M 0 1 2 4 6 FDOT District 6 Mile Markers Fatal Crashes Basemap Routes Years 2014 to 2018 Lower Keys (Key West) Fatal Crashes Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Cluster Maps l� p� �y 54 l i�PPh�itt � Cot t' (' td p ' pa p d q RD a; y kr. rs Np-..GK� P �w p i`� o ff Y y� V tv i> y g fYf r p p AT NTIC` B r �l e- tasr �- ' ,41 i S�M�N0 v ��Q'l ysrb Z1 l°s6°J r, s� VENET6P,N fin` BLVD 444 Ir a� h rta 'l 3" i f �ygTCUMBE gVEUE NO �t i D htE IT � j 1 m 4 i o' Q�w w�f o � 6F Ily'ii off �4g I fiY A' O' t� GTf 6SAD wS 73 m I'T v tM A SrREET m Z s 109ST/KEY COLDNEY i c 3�g m 7f T I I� l Ih SOS RO MATHO� AV a � r i r� t _ ¢� z ''�' v }3r ky� +r t: �j 4� CD Elf 0 r tV) SAND j RD( (L� CC U WILDER ROAD 1, FIE AVE._ ` �� 9 3ARRY L;P�PEGWf p,VENUE'Q�I� t VEST INDIES CR 3A ; i DRIVE, 07, �I p In, s RDA© F o� =ilu ,s �s A t Ld 9 wz a 9Q souls jy W S k f of � ° w � �s a!� l s� i ! qm if N R(7 a'KLAND DR 10 a' C s� " AT z'o E) LL Qf v yt� pI 5 R v�I pkv Vo, yV qP ,,ret4 y'� 4"1 4j1G� h�a 4 e r; 4 ATTIC! 81� � F s i Oil ° r„ s w �C) l t ,S 'w" s� sl-_0\NAo t % 0 w 0 (S ti } VENETIAN � BLV D. r_N 5 ,1�f Y8 yl ..w D I� f MA UMBE AV E E �t iK i� ix„ �lA t 4ya � e Jy � �y r 4P° J 4 r� eta `t 1 uj �w �G P I� F � I r { F ial C� o° t� �-o ;ter G y7 PIr, m G §t 5 SAD `� GSWY 3 C, 12TH G v STREET'�m Z �1 gK 109ST/KE 1 COLONEY } z; 4 cd m r t� r � s M ag f M H , O1 , Q tYy z ,qY 'n la'( }3r ky� L CD Elf co z 0 co W SAND$>F RD.1, WILDER ROAD SHIPJ' WAYZ FIE AVE. 3ARRY P GW p,yENUE,o :71 WEST INDIES DRIVE RX 0 S In, 0 R� F SO w�z n ,r SpU N,pO1N7 OR' r� +j rrF t o ��w v u. a., '6 j� 1(yy fG u, f"can �i v ,� G- L' 1(Yll 4� is s Rd LI fr �co LAND DR ° ,, o aVa� 7 w pGA Z om '-• a LL Ojai Y}y Fr a' e �F Q 0, , PROp/rpO ,PJt Al�,k� 7 ,; 9 4. S 4 r- gm ol �i5 m2 }s' 4o' AT TIC vm , tg t �Y4/V© .441 �W� til� MU� t(�Y �j M\NdE r� o r, z �E�3 O f VENETIAN hi rta 'l 11 Y8 I� t� r, MAT;cUMBE pVEUE f{� F RRI 1 D htE is f€ >s 4 L< fiJ � k �I 0 co Ole a 9s 0 �0 0Al ADWSI' pp G_SWy ti0 73 ) 12TH G v STREETSM Z 10 NE COLOLOfVE i` G 1f� } S 0 MgR� MAP JTHA e e AV y u. J� H C7 la'( }3r ky� J 1 I i tm A ' Y�it(n , ;} t i LElf IB CD m z i SAND >I�` RD( � � I U }) WILDER ROAD Ol p�1 SHIPI` WAYJ FIE AVE., S 3ARRY P(�GRF,�� ' p,VENUE o WEST INDIES OR 3Ali DRIVE 0 �y f� S RC7A© r 4�0 O ,s i �.1 3{ ea i Ld 9 WIZ 9 solo"p0{N7 DR' t�jy w S k 44V k� G �m S \�t 4r�f`�ST f qgo /v��Ry �4 Uo�� f RDt" LAND DR o l" `RqT tL(Y �, 1 o kSF Q J/ PX-\ �� tf f , Top" low �� t r ► a AS P�4 % 4 We } ► p � . 70 tip erg+. , g° '�lf G PIS SM 3 S�01�. rm ti t r� � ►ram ► u „1 4i AT `.t TIC gymco t'a ► aw , �Ma MAN 4 , h r t s{u VENETIAN BLVD. I C17 lam_ �4N Mq s UMBE Av E f{�qqkk �fk S el�a� I ;S J y Jx� r�� ti Ct_ t t�, T t to �b v 4 =ter s� L Owl O 'l�w J kv 5 l Ua�UP ♦W F�F NO F � I r { F ial f. O y o a HSAD WSF CSWY 1 I2TH s�q STREET��m Z 1 ram'( 109ST/KE`', COLONE I, 4 cd b; r, 80 NCH�d RO {l��Sli Me i. 0 AV ` Ef R_ x la'( }3r ky� c �4 {'v �n HVrr-� a, sy, Aw + N L Elf m w � co 0 w�� SAND$>,, RD � I CC U WILDER ROADS 101 J SHIPI` FIE AVE., ,fffj,, �� o S pAFtRY � 0�pC1 p,VENUEwI. . lr� VEST INDIES DRIVE' ., yµ M �f .w "E In, S P,0P© r 0 ,s i �.1 3{ ea i R�09 4w w� J 4 DR SOU N,p0{PJ � t y I� (yy fG u, Qi G LDR i a GqN� �pRY VO� i c9 4 O 5, I4sfF VV�4 OGA .....E z Qjti (� LL Ojai Y}y Fr a' e APPENDIX F — FDOT Level of Service Analysis Summary N M 0Z 06 LL aN 0o r- m �l �t Ln _j Ln (n O 4.0 N N �t O m O O m O r1 3 a� a-I N c-I u in rn � M CT) CT) CT) CT) CT) rn obi N W } O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O L Q O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O �O 0 ro M m r) M m M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O -1 -1 c-I -i -i c-I -i c-I N fV (V (V N N N N N N N Q O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O C p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 rn an 0) rn m m m m m m m m m m m Cl) m m m m m m rn rn rn Cl) rn N V) • a) m c an a, Q mm c 0 O c c c O c LU LU a) LU \ 0 c L m U m m C 0 O m e w Q 2 0 o m � 4• 0 -0 41 0 > 0 Ln O L O LUcic > > o L m m LLI Q V) 'L a>) \ m Q O a U W OJ c .� a. n Ln o U CO L z V) ) U Q OO N i 0Q `> 4� -2 co \O O 1= cc m U O O fa m0 N E 'A oU Umcc O m —0 0V) V) W V 0 V) pV N L>V Y v 4- Z) L v d CL' O N m a) m O N Y • m m cOn Z m Z oC O w O m +, N m m cI C V) m m d O _ y W Ln O 0 m 0 N n O v m m w f�'o G 2 w p d JL a, o > 0 0 "' a a) N 4� 4� + o o m m L W W (Z w \cu O C L L m r) c Q 0 O a)V) L L m m 0 0 E 4- LU Q f0 O O > v } LU }' }' L m 0 0 +' 4-Ln > v 0 > L + OC 4' U 0 m O LU c4-1 a) a) c� c v, '� > +1 v Ln m m > -0 Q n 'n cc oc > > J V) +-� > c-I �' T m m � (n H m aJ a) O m m Q L N \ +, Q � Q U w O c: to Vf L N > a a) L m in a) O + m nmp (06 m O L Q N 00 a) 0 00 c bn ! 0 Q aa) > Z Ca a) L ° Y c� E °' c m a) Cr m Y O O m > a) oC N hD a) O LLa U p p U m m L cc m V) V) W + a� w > Ln E O Z O in N U 'A O +J +1 p CC \ U p 0 LL v Y V) L Y m O 0 N 0 Ln a) m 4' O }' tn CD m O V01 Z m Z W > O � a) d V) 0 m 0000 O Ln 4� V) v 4- w O ro m m r1 O ° 0 m � rn _0 +� w LU _0 _0 m _0 _0 > > > > > > > > m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ;V) V) V) V) V) (A 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 > > > > > > > > m m m m m m m m ao an an an ap .up .up an en an an aj (D ai a) w w w N = � = em s = � = V) LO V) V) Ln V) V) V) V) V) a) o a) w v a) w Q) m m m m m m m m m m m O O O o o O O o 4� }, 4� 4- 4- 4� +- +- a, v v a, v a, a, v a, a) a, O O O O O O O O N N Ln Ln � Ln Ln N N Ln N U V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) L L L L L L L L L L L LL Q V) V) N V) V) V1 V) V) a) a a a a) a a a) a) a) a) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ > > > > > > > > > > > a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ln Ln Ln Ul Ln V) V) V) V) V) In (n V) EL6 o� rn o�S QV � °°) o Do a, r- O O N -1 t0 3 0 .-i r-I N O O O ++ U N O O O O O a) a) a) a) a1 } O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lV fV M M M M (M fM M M N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn m m m m m m m a) a) rn m m m a s a, z oLaj (D Qaj cn ~a) cs+� c (Awv� ° 00 �c o o o m L W 0a-- m � m � a m L C V) a _ O a) a) c -, u m m Y 0_ N Y C n3 a) _ CU W L 0_ +J sE LO \ _0 0_ Q C N >' L aD V) .O S W N \ V) ° L 0' L a1 L a) C aA \ ° J Q N m C< a1 a C C cicQ) to c V) L V) -0 L m L aD +� aD L C6 L = 4- O L (6 >. � l� W L L \ O � U � ° L O = m O �— O W Q L W O O m O m j z 'i O 4 '� ro N J O m SZ @ ° L H v7 c _4- W � 0 — C Q CO to O Ln m cB N + s C O 2 O w cV'a i s trA = c m d C LU O L +� m y V) `° 4- aD m z w V) o ° o c m 0- o 'E - •� V) +1 °Q o +, a ,° a, m Ln w >O Lnm cV' c o @ w w W V aJ a) � aA OC a) co co N m L 0 L a) r I L m m wL •L UI aJ C �. VI L Sl o m Q -C W 4- w = O L r a� S 4+ -C O -0 C: Q L 4- ° 6 4- U `~ Vl O mL W m V) -0 ° (1) O a) C CU ) d J U m a N W W f6 f6 ca L V � a) _ aD Q J Q C< ++ m m v N S H m (D \ ]G a C •L >. C_ (H W owC OC La) + V \Q O °a°1 o(c) E U C � C O CaC, _O co O O Z aD O S O OC 0 V) WQa) O > J � LV) = � O O N C aJ C O O o 'nLno = o ° N + U 4� _ m 0-w 0 m 4-1 4- 4-1 W on V) O O m w V) s O "' 0 aC o o � 'uLD o a a o o aa- N C o `n Ln > ra w m LO w Ln O V N W (6 W to ca to co to co co ra ca ra to co � to ca to ca ro tv ra to ca � to to to n aD uD oD aD aD aD aD aD a.o aD aD aD ao aD aD aD aD aD aD aD aD eD aD aD aD aD a V) Ln 0 0 0 0 0 V) V) Ln V) Ln Ll V) V) (A V) V) V) V) V) V) V) (A Vt u J tB ro to to co co m M ra m (D (D m m to m m m m m m m m to to n v a) ° v v ° v ° a1 w w w w v v v ° a1 431 a V1 V1 V1 (n Ul (n (n !n V) (n Ul V) V) VI 0 VI !n V) V1 V) ul Ul V) !n VI Vl V U L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Q a) a a) a a) (L) V (1) a) a) a (1) a) (1) a) (11 (1) a) a) a) (1) a1 a) a) (i1 (i1 a 11 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > r- Cn V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) VI V) V) V) V) V) V) V) VI V) V) VI V) V ar QV) O (n m o o ko 3 o Ln O O NV) U O O O 01 01 Q1 } O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O C 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0) 0) C) 0) 01 0) 0) 0) 01 C) C) m m 0) 0) m 0) 01 0) 01 C) 0) 0) bn 4- a-+ > a) � C C a) (6 73 CL O W `� a--'fu S Z U 4 J N W on +' 1 w > O +.+ Q > C W U m > L bA z a) w W (6 L U M > > W C: V) y� 0 > p L > > � a w w Q Q c L Eb Z nO 0) cn S: c � }? a1 a) O a L > (6 Ln m W L L CL ca Q O > C Y p (� u c aI = m m L O c p O O L \ W p m Y Y U C= � m L "' N *' Q co ra V U a)Ln U -0 p > a) oc (n m = m Y v i c U O U abn v > 4. ai > E CoC J 3 bn = N rl r-I �(j i 3 p p V > .0 L (6 O C J O C _ V C O m N Z Z v Y Y v > W tv w O L n 0 p u 3 4 J � N p v rl `~ 4- Y L > On bn CO [O � to O U P ~ m 4 V 4- n O L v O O ca 0 c N } +� H O O z O O � a) 4, CO Q N v +' W .-I O O `01 > O O N O L a O 4- E 4� w a) O v (D O N J c O " 4L, 41 > C: C i 4• 7 O w W O Q c V +� a) �_ 0 C O O O p COro C p �n 4 Q ra w O [L +, = Q 0- � O ko Ln � Ln p Q N C a a) 0- o w °o 'i Ln a w �_ w ra r w V � � Z Ln a ca bA (n _0 p O to v L ca c m L L p (n N a co Q p (a +, V) o ;° 0) � � ,� w v o p c_ OLn w LU o -se L_ 0 � _0 a) W m C Ua1 `V >o > QmN > > O ra v iom 4. O a) o_ W d L � Q a) W O u s= to 2 m 4 cu 1 O Ln O 0 w bn 3 a) in d � U w N +� 4 Q M U H V V � V) > a) cOa u bn O p (s N cn s U LU > j V) p to 2 \ c am > Y Z5 3 O V U u \ aJ _0 O Z > i a U jNC a) =Co > to C O O 4- Z > O CO n> OO LO OE41 4- to V) E U E � UO O N O N a >V) i J 7 U m C O w 4J O OC: Om WY L p7 = w 1H co ai -2 LO V 40 v O >>� (u o0 bn a_ O Y J > W 0 E 4-O C u O V O ra Q � L �_ O c c Li- u a� O o a p c O N a 4- w O v w w s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= s= to to to W bn bO W W W W bO bO W W W bO ao W W bO bn bn bn Ln U') V) Ul V) V) En Ln L/) Ul tA V) 0 U, 0 � Ln � � V) V) V) Ul J RS ra (O (O (o RS (E (D m (D (6 m (6 m m (O (4 m RS m (6 (6 m a) () () a) Q) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a1 w a) a) a) a) a) () a) a) (n (n (n (n V) Vf (n (n Vf (n (n VI V) VI (n !n V1 V) Vf Vf !n Vf (A U L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Q a1 aJ a) () 0) a) a) a) (1) a) a) (1) a) (11 (1) a) a) a a) a1 a) C) a1 11 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ cn cn cn cn cn (n cn cn (n cn cn (n cn cn cn cn cn Ln cn (n cn cn cn N y N N N N GJ E 06 N N N 06 075 N r4 076 N Qc-I CV N m N N N N N (V (V MIZT rl (VI:t � � � O ri O1 O O O O O O -1V p( O 0 O O Ln Ln Ln O O O O O +O+ U N O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O Ol Ol Ol Q1 Ol Ql Ql Ol Ol Q1 } O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 (N O � O O O O O O O O 3 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O l0 l0 lD lD to lD lD l0 1.0 LD l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O a1 c CU o C X c c O Q U -0 c0 _0 LU W LU >- 4- +' Y C m> C O > 0 Ln c a) W V m L O L O _O m +- O W °' ai LLI �' > aOi 1° C c � a' U U w > > > LU >o (u m " 4- v7 (z a) " � M M u m U Q oc 0 U Ln ru c c t '" > H m Co O > +� �, 0 o L n Y 0 N � �, N '+� cv > a>, 'o o +, 0 0 0 > 'n c c o 0 C a) s � > ° o_ N o o m M O Q C 2 ~ O w O o � co ca 3 N N m L O E v � o cn a 0 en `" a) c c O o m V) -a � °° °° Q o +, a) m m o V LU v � a) (0 N � L Ln V O Y _0 (3) m q0 s m N U 1� _ co O O a) X 0 (0 +' > > (o (a Q Ln Lco = C C m O p OH a O LU LU U -00) C0 (0 c0 N = -_00 O � +s 4J N m v u (tea u w mu 0 H a) H H m N ° a) bjO L m C \ NU C tlO > p v C aJ O O o 0 a O ON > C LU O E � z cc 0 0 Ln Ln co O > cu Ln +� o +� 0 W V m W � Ln ~ U a) > Q m Q 0 w nn +ai V)M O O LL. E > O cn ,} 01 W O > 0 }+ LU V) \ N a) } (0 �l W > J Q m (0 (6 m (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 m (0 (0 (0 m (0 (0 (0 H 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 tin an an ao an an tin tin ao an an an an .up tin .up ao an an an } _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = o F- L/) in V) V) U') L/) Ln V) Ll 0 V) V) V) En Ln L/) V) V) V) V) O (6 (0 (6 f0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (6 (0 f0 (0 (0 (0 f0 (0 (0 (0 (V W_ a) O a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) () a) Vf VI VI Vf (n Vf (n V7 V) V) VI In Vf (n (n Vf Vf Vf VI Ln a1 U L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L U Q a a a a) a s a) a a) 0 a (1) a) a) (1) a) O O W (1) C LL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a) N c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I 0' cn cn to cn cn Ln cn Ln cn cn Ln cn Ln cn cn Ln cn cn cn cn r4 FDOT Generalized Service Volume Tables TABLE 1 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas January 2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Core Urbanized Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 2 Undivided * 16,800 17,700 ** 4 47,600 66,400 83,200 87,300 4 Divided * 37,900 39,800 ** 6 70,100 97,800 123,600 131,200 6 Divided * 58,400 59,900 ** 8 92,200 128,900 164,200 174,700 8 Divided * 78,800 80,100 ** 10 115,300 158,900 203,600 218,600 Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 12 136,500 192,400 246,200 272,900 Lanes Median B C D E Urbanized 2 Undivided * 7,300 14,800 15,600 Lanes B C D E 4 Divided * 14,500 32,400 33,800 4 45,900 62,700 75,600 85,400 6 Divided * 23,300 50,000 50,900 6 68,900 93,900 113,600 128,100 8 Divided * 32,000 67,300 68,100 8 91,900 125,200 151,300 170,900 10 115,000 156,800 189,300 213,600 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Lanes Ramp by the indicated percent.) Present in Both Directions Metering Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% +20,000 +5% Median& Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 11,700 18,000 24,200 32,600 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 36,300 52,600 66,200 75,300 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 54,600 78,800 99,400 113,100 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE' Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service does:not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer:models from which this table is derived should be used for volumes.) more specific planning,applications.The table and deriving computer models should Paved not be used for corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist. Shoulder/Bicycle Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% * 2,900 7,600 19,700 z Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of vehicles,not number of bicyclists.:or pedestrians using the:facility. 50-84% 2,100 6,700 19,700 >19,700 85-100% 9,300 19,700 >19,700 ** 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traflic flow. PEDESTRIAN MODE *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service **Not apphcabte for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode,volumes volumes.) greater than level of service D become:F because intersection capacities have been reached For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not achievable Sidewalk Coverage B C D E because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 0-49% * * 2,800 9,500 Source: 50-84% * 1,600 8,700 15,800 Florida Department of Transportation Systems Implementation Office 85-100% 3,800 10,700 17,400 >19,700 littl)s://,A-%vw.fdot.gov/1)[aiiiiiii---/systems/ BUS MODE(Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 1 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's (continued) Urbanized Areas January 2020 Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Core Freeways Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 4-12 2 4-6 2 4-8 2 4-8 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 65 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 70 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary Lanes(n,y) n n Median(d,twlt,n,nr,r) d n r n r r r Terrain(l,r) I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 80 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 3 3 5 5 2 2 1.9 1.8 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.090 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.560 0.565 0.560 0.565 0.565 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pcphpl) 2,400 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 4 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 120 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicvcle Ped Bus Level Two-Lan Multilane Class I Class II Servicee Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph > 17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 > 18 mph > 13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 1 <35 > 15 mph > 10 mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK '" TABLE 2 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas' January2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 4 45,100 59,000 70,300 72,600 2 Undivided * 14,400 16,200 ** 6 65,300 86,600 104,100 108,900 4 Divided * 34,000 35,500 ** 8 85,900 114,500 138,100 145,300 6 Divided * 52,100 53,500 ** 10 101,600 135,600 161,900 181,800 Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Lanes Ramp 2 Undivided * 6,500 13,300 14,200 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided * 9,900 28,800 31,600 +20,000 +5% 6 Divided * 16,000 44,900 47,600 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median& Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 11,300 17,300 23,400 31,600 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 34,600 49,900 63,000 71,700 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 51,700 74,800 94,600 107,400 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% z BICYCLE MODE 'Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table directional roadway lanes to deterinine two-way maximum service does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for volumes.) more specific,planning applications The table and deriving computer modals should Paved not be used for cotndor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity Shoulder/Bicycle and Quality of Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E -49% * 2,600 6,1�� 19,500 -Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of vehicles,not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility..... 50-84% 1,900 5,500 18,400 >19,500 85-100% 7,500 19,500 >19,500 ** 'Buses per hour shown ueonly for the peak hour n the smgle irectronof helrigher$aflic flow; PEDESTRIAN MODE' *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service *Not applicable le for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have volumes.) been reached.For the bicycle mode,the lcv el of service letter grade(including F):is not achicv able because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table Sidewalk Coverage B C D E input value default,, 0-49% * * 2,800 9,400 50-84% * 1,600 8,600 15> Florid 600 Florida Department of Transportation.. 85-100% 3,800 10,500 17,100 >19,500 systems Implementation office httns.//v.7vw.fdot.eov/ulannin�/systems/ BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)' (Buses in peak hour in peals direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 2 Generalized Annual Average Daily volumes for Florida's (continued) Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas January2020 Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Freeways Highways Class I Class lI Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d n y n y r r Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 60 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) I In n n n n n Facility length(mi) 6 5 5 1.8 2 2 2 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.098 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.565 0.570 0.570 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 4 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 150 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) n n Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus Level Two-Lane Multilane Class 1 Class 11 Service Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31mph >22mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph >17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 > 18 mph >13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 <35 1 > 15 mph I >10 mph <5.00 <5.00 1 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK 12 TABLE 3 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Population' January2020 a t� STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 2 Undivided * 12,900 14,200 ** 4 34,800 48,000 56,700 63,200 4 Divided * 29,300 30,400 ** 6 48,900 69,000 82,600 94,800 6 Divided * 45,200 45,800 ** 8 62,900 90,400 108,400 126,400 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Lanes by the indicated percent.) Present in Both Directions Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% +20,000 Median& Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Rural Undeveloped 2 Divided Yes No +5% Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 2 Undivided 4,600 8,600 14,000 28,500 Multi Undivided No No -25% 4 Divided 31,200 44,900 55,700 62,700 Yes +5% 6 Divided 46,800 67,600 83,500 94,200 One-Way Facility Adjustment Developed Areas Multiply the corresponding two-directional Lanes Median B C D E volumes in this table by 0.6 2 Undivided 10,300 15,700 21,300 28,500 4 Divided 29,300 42,300 54,000 61,600 6 Divided 44,000 63,600 81,200 92,400 Passing Lane Adjustments Alter LOS B-D volumes in proportion to the passing lane length to BICYCLE MODE' the highway segment length (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service vohmics.) Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors Rural Undeveloped 2 Divided Yes +5% Paved Multi Undivided Yes -5% Shoulder/Bicycle Multi Undivided No -25% Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% * 1,300 2,000 3,200 'Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for level,of 50-84% 1,000 2,100 3,200 10,600 service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only toy general planning 85-100% 2,600 3,900 18,500 >18,500 applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should Developed Areas not be used for corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist. Paved Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and.:Quahty of Service Manual, /Bic Shouldererycle in Shoulder/Bicycle B C D Ei Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes this table is based on number of vehicles,not number ofbicyclists or pedestrians using the.facility. 0-49% * 2,300 4,900 15,600 50-84% 1,700 4,500 13,300 18,500 *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. 85-100% 5,900 18,500 >18,500 ** **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level:of service D become F because intersection capacities have PEDESTRIAN MODE' been reached,For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of input value defaults directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Source Florida Department of Transportation Sidewalk Coverage B C D E systems Implementation office 0-49% * * 2,700 9,200 https//wwu.fdot.gov/planning/systcros/ 50-84% * 1,500 8,400 14,900 85-100% 3,600 10,200 16,700 >19,200 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 3 Generalized Annual Average Daily volumes for Florida's (continued) Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Population January2020 INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities ASSUMPTIONS Free Highways Freeways Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian Undeveloped Developed ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) rural Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-8 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 2 Posted speed(mph) 70 55 55 50 50 45 45 55 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 60 60 55 55 50 50 60 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d d n r r r n Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 20 60 Exclusive left turn lanes(n,y) [n] y [n] y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n_+ n Facility length(mi) 18 10 10 5 5 1.9 2.2 4 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.105 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.550 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.88 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pcphpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 12.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 6.0 3.5 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 •left turns 12 12 12 12 •right turns 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 6 2 4 4 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 3 3 3 Signal type(a,c,p) c c a a a Cycle length(C) 90 90 60 90 90 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t t Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Level of Freeways Highways Service Two-Lane ru Two-Lane rd Multilane ru Multilane rd Density %tsf ats %ffs Density Density B < 14 <50 <55 >83.3 <14 <14 C <22 <65 <50 >75.0 <22 <22 D <29 <80 <45 >66.7 <29 <29 E <36 >80 <40 >58.3 <34 <34 Level of Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian Service Major City/Co.(ats) Score Score B >31 mph <2.75 <2.75 C >23 mph _<3.50 <3.50 D > 18 mph <4.25 <4.25 E >15 mph <5.00 <5.00 %tsf=Percent time spent following°/offs=Percent of free flow speed ats=Average travel speed ru=Rural undeveloped rd= Rural developed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 4 Generalized Peak Hour TWO-Way Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas' January 2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Core Urbanized Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 2 Undivided * 1,510 1,600 ** 4 4,050 5,640 6,800 7,420 4 Divided * 3,420 3,580 ** 6 5,960 8,310 10,220 11,150 6 Divided * 5,250 5,390 ** 8 7,840 10,960 13,620 14,850 8 Divided * 7,090 7,210 ** 10 9,800 13,510 17,040 18,580 Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 12 11,600 16,350 20,930 23,200 Lanes Median B C D E Urbanized 2 Undivided * 660 1,330 1,410 Lanes B C D E 4 Divided * 1,310 2,920 3,040 4 4,130 5,640 7,070 7,690 6 Divided * 2,090 4,500 4,590 6 6,200 8,450 10,510 11,530 8 Divided * 2,880 6,060 6,130 8 8,270 11,270 13,960 15,380 10 10,350 14,110 17,310 19,220 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Lanes Ramp by the indicated percent.) Present in Both Directions Metering Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% +1,800 +5% Median&Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 1,050 1,620 2,180 2,930 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 3,270 4,730 5,960 6,780 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 4,910 7,090 8,950 10,180 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE 'Values shown are presented as peak'hour directional volumes for levels of service and (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific volumes.) planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used for Paved corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist.Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the Bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on 0-49% * 260 680 1,770 number of vehicles,not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 50-84% 190 600 1,770 >1,770 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction ofthQ higher traffic 85-100% 830 1,700 >1,770 ** flow: *PEDESTRIAN MODEZ Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service become F because intersection capacities have directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not volumes.) achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. Source: 0-49% * * 250 850 Florida Department of Transportation 50-84% * 150 780 1,420 Systems Implementation Office 85-100% 340 960 1,560 >1,770 https://www.fdot.goN/planning/systems/ BUS MODE(Scheduled Fixed Route)' (Buses in peak hour in peals direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 4 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's (continued) Urbanized Areas January 2020 Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Core Freeways Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 4-12 2 4-6 2 4-8 2 4-8 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 65 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 70 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary Lanes(n,y) n n Median(d,twlt,n,nr,r) d n r n r r r Terrain(l,r) I I I I I t I 1 1 1 %no passing zone 80 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 3 3 5 5 2 2 1.9 1.8 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.090 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.560 0.565 0.560 0.565 0.565 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 4 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 120 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bievele Ped Bus Level Two-Lan Multilane Class I Class II Servicee Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph > 17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 > 18 mph > 13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 1 <35 > 15 mph > 10 mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 5 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way volumes for Florida's Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas' January2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,420 5,780 6,890 7,110 2 Undivided * 1,300 1,460 ** 6 6,400 8,490 10,200 10,670 4 Divided 3,060 3,200 ** 8 8,420 11,220 13,530 14,240 6 Divided 4,690 4,820 ** 10 9,960 13,290 15,870 17,820 Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Lanes Ramp 2 Undivided * 580 1,200 1,280 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided * 890 2,590 2,850 +1,800 +5% 6 Divided * 1,440 4,040 4,280 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median& Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 1,020 1,560 2,110 2,840 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 3,110 4,490 5,670 6,450 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 4,650 6,730 8,510 9,670 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE' 'Values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does nots directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific volumes.) planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used for Paved corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist.Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on 0-49% * 140 550 1,760 number of vehicles,not number ofbcyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 5 0-84% 170 500 1,650 >1,760 'Bases per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic 85-100% 670 1,760 >1,760 ** flow. PEDESTRIAN MODE' *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults, (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below*by number of **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes greater than level of service become F because'intersection capacities have volumes.) been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. 0-49% * * 250 850 Soinve: 50-84% * 150 780 1,410 Florida Department ofFransportation Systems Implementation Office 85-100% 340 950 1,540 >1,760 https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/ BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)-' (Buses in peak hour in peals direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 5 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way volumes for Florida's (continued) Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas January2020 Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Freeways Highways Class I Class lI Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d n y n y r r Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 60 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) I In n n n n n Facility length(mi) 6 5 5 1.8 2 2 2 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.098 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.565 0.570 0.570 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 4 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 150 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) n n Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus Level Two-Lane Multilane Class 1 Class 11 Service Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31mph >22mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph >17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 > 18 mph >13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 <35 1 > 15 mph I >10 mph <5.00 <5.00 1 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 6 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Populations January 2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 2 Undivided * 1220 1350 ** 4 3,650 5,040 5,950 6,640 4 Divided * 2,,790 2,,890 ** 6 5,130 7,250 8,670 9,950 6 Divided * 4,300 4,350 ** 8 6,600 9,490 11,380 13,270 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Lanes by the indicated percent.) Present in Both Directions Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% +1,800 Median& Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Rural Undeveloped 2 Divided Yes No +5% Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 2 Undivided 440 820 1,330 2,710 Multi Undivided No No -25% 4 Divided 2,960 4,270 5,290 5,960 Yes +5% 6 Divided 4,450 6,420 7,930 8,950 One-Way Facility Adjustment Developed Areas Lanes Median B C D E Multiply the corresponding two-directional 2 Undivided 980 1,490 2,020 2,710 volumes in this table by 0.6 4 Divided 2,780 4,020 5,130 5,850 6 Divided 4,180 6,040 7,710 8,780 Passing Lane Adjustments z Alter LOS B-D volumes in proportion to the passing lane length to BICYCLE MODE the highway segment length (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors Rural Undeveloped 2 Divided Yes +5% Paved Multi Undivided Yes -5% Shoulder/Bicycle Multi Undivided No -25% Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% * 120 190 300 'values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and 50-84% 100 200 310 1,010 are for the automobile/[nick modes unless specifically stated,This table does not 85-100% 250 370 1,760 >1,760 constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific Developed Areas planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist.Calculations are Paved based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number 0-49% * 220 460 1,480 ofvchicles,not number ofbicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 50-84% 170 430 1,270 >1,760 *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. 85-100% 560 1,760 >1,760 ** **Not applicable for(hat level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, PEDESTRIAN MODE volumes greatei than level of service become F because intersection capacities have been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level ofservice letter gradc,(including F)is not (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service value defaults. volumes.) Source: Florida Department of Transportation Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Systems Implementation Office 0-49% * * 220 840 https://wunv.fdot.gov/plamiing/systems/ 50-84% * 120 780 1,390 85-100% 320 940 1,560 >1,820 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 6 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way volumes for Florida's (continued) Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Population January 2020 INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities ASSUMPTIONS Highways Freeways Undevelo ed Developed Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) rural Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-8 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 2 Posted speed(mph) 70 55 55 50 50 45 45 55 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 60 60 55 55 50 50 60 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d d n r r r n Terrain(l,r) 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 20 60 Exclusive left turn lanes(n,y) [n] y [n] y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n Facility length(mi) 18 10 10 5 5 1.9 2.2 4 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.105 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.550 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 12.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 6.0 3.5 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 •left turns 12 12 12 12 •right turns 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 6 2 4 4 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 3 3 3 Signal type(a,c,p) e c a a a Cycle length(C) 90 90 60 90 90 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t t Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%, Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Highways Servicea Level Freeways Two-Lane ru Two-Lane rd Multilane ru Multilane rd Density %tsf ats %ffs Density Density B < 14 <50 <55 >83.3 <14 <14 C <22 _<65 <50 >75.0 _<22 _<22 D <29 <80 <45 >66.7 <29 <29 E <36 >80 <40 >58.3 <34 <34 Level of Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian Service Major City/Co.(ats) Score Score B >31 mph _<2.75 <2.75 C >23 mph <3.50 <3.50 D >18 mph <4.25 <4.25 E > 15 mph <5.00 <5.00 %tsf=Percent time spent following%ffs=Percent of free flow speed ats=Average travel speed ru=Rural undeveloped rd= Rural developed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 7 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas January2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class 1(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Core Urbanized Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 1 Undivided * 830 880 ** 2 2,230 3,100 3,740 4,080 2 Divided * 1,910 2,000 ** 3 3,280 4,570 5,620 6,130 3 Divided * 2,940 3,020 ** 4 4,310 6,030 7,490 8,170 4 Divided * 3,970 4,040 ** 5 5,390 7,430 9,370 10,220 Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 6 6,380 8,990 11,510 12,760 Lanes Median B C D E Urbanized 1 Undivided * 370 750 800 Lanes B C D E 2 Divided * 730 1,630 1,700 2 2,270 3,100 3,890 4,230 3 Divided * 1,170 2,520 2,560 3 3,410 4,650 5,780 6,340 4 Divided * 1,610 3,390 3,420 4 4,550 6,200 7,680 8,460 5 5,690 7,760 9,520 10,570 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Ramp by the indicated percent.) Lane Metering Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% +1,000 +5% Median&Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 1 Divided Yes No +5% 1 Undivided 580 890 1,200 1,610 1 Undivided No No -20% 2 Divided 1,800 2,600 3,280 3,730 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 3 Divided 2,700 3,900 4,920 5,600 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 1 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 1.2 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE 'Values shown are presented as peak hourdirectional volumes for levels of service and (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific volumes.) planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used to[- Paved corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist.Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E + 0-49% * 150 390 1,000 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes m this table is based on number of vehicles,not number of bicyclists orpedestnans using the`facility. 50-84% 110 340 1,000 >1,000 'Buses per hour shown are only for The peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic 85-100% 470 1,000 >1,000 ** flow. PEDESTRIAN MODE "Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of ** Not applicable for that 1cvc1 of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes greater than level of service D become F because'intersection capacities'.have volumes.) been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level ofservice letter grade(including F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. 0-49% * * 140 480 Sowce. 50-84% 80 440 800 Florida Department of Transportation 85-100% 200 540 880 >1 000 Systems Implementation Office https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/ BUS MODE(Scheduled Fixed Route)' (Buses in peak hour in peals direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 7 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida's (continued) Urbanized Areas January 2020 Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Core Freeways Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 4-12 2 4-6 2 4-8 2 4-8 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 65 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 70 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary Lanes(n,y) n n Median(d,twlt,n,nr,r) d n r n r r r Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 80 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 3 3 5 5 2 2 1.9 1.8 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.090 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.560 0.565 0.560 0.565 0.565 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 4 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 120 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bievele Ped Bus Level Two-Lan Multilane Class I Class H Service Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph > 17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 > 18 mph > 13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 <35 > 15mph > 10mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 8 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida's Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas January 2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 2 2,430 3,180 3,790 3,910 1 Undivided * 710 800 ** 3 3,520 4,670 5,610 5,870 2 Divided * 1,740 1,820 ** 4 4,630 6,170 7,440 7,830 3 Divided * 2,670 2,740 * 5 5,480 7,310 8,730 9,800 Class 11(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Ramp 1 Undivided * 330 680 720 Lane Metering 2 Divided * 500 1,460 1,600 +1,000 +5% 3 Divided * 810 2,280 2,420 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median&Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E l Divided Yes No +5% 1 Undivided 560 860 1,160 1,560 1 Undivided No No -20% 2 Divided 1,710 2,470 3,120 3,550 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 3 Divided 2,560 3,700 4,680 5,320 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 1 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 1.2 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE' 'Values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific volumes.) planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used for Paved corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist,Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on 0-49% * 140 320 1,000 number of N ehicles,not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the ifacility. 50-84% 100 280 940 >1,000 'Buscsperhourshovvn are onlv for the peak hour in the single direction ofthe highertraffic 85-100% 380 1,000 >1,000 ** flow. PEDESTRIAN MODE' *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes greaten than level of service D become F because intersection capacities'have volumes.) been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not i achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. 0-49% * * 140 480 Solace. 50-84/0 o 80 440 800 Florida Department of Transportation Systems Tmplcmcnta[ion office 85-100% 200 540 880 >1,000 https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/ BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peals direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 8 Generalized Peak Hour Directional volumes for Florida's (continued) Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas January 2020 Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) urban Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d n y n y r r Terrain(l,r) I I I I 1 I I I 1 %no passing zone 60 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 6 5 5 1.8 2 2 2 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.098 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.565 0.570 0.570 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 4 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 150 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) n n Sidewalk(n,y) it,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus Level Two-Lane Multilane Class I Class B Servicee Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph >17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 >18 mpb >13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 >58.3 <35 7 >15 mph > 10 mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed QUALITYILEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 9 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida's Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Populations January 2020 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Lanes Median B C D E Lanes B C D E 1 Undivided * 670 740 ** 2 2,010 2,770 3,270 3,650 2 Divided * 1,530 1,580 ** 3 2,820 3,990 4,770 5,470 3 Divided * 2,360 2,400 ** 4 3,630 5,220 6,260 7,300 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes Auxiliary Lane by the indicated percent.) + 1,000 Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median&Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Rural Undeveloped 1 Divided Yes No +5% 1 Undivided No No -20°% Lanes Median B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 1 Undivided 240 450 730 1,490 Multi Undivided No No -25% 2 Divided 1,630 2,350 2,910 3,280 Yes +5% 3 Divided 2,450 3,530 4,360 4,920 One-Way Facility Adjustment Developed Areas Multiply the corresponding directional Lanes Median B C D E volumes in this table by 1.2 1 Undivided 540 820 1,110 1,490 2 Divided 1,530 2,210 2,820 3,220 3 Divided 2,300 3,320 4,240 4,830 BICYCLE MODE' Passing Lane Adjustments Alter LOS B-D volumes in proportion to the passing lane length to (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of the highway segment length directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service voltmlcs.) Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Rural Undeveloped Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors Paved 1 Divided Yes +5% Shoulder/Bicycle Multi Undivided Yes -5% Lane Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided No -25% 0-49% * 70 110 170 'Values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and 50-84% 60 120 180 580 are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does note 85-100n�o 140 210 1,000 >1,000 constitute a standard and Should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should not be used for Developed Areas corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist.Calculations are Paved based on planning applications of theHCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Shoulder/Bicycle Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number 0-49% * 120 260 840 of vehicles,notnumber of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. r 50-84% 100 240 720 1,000 *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. 85-100% 320 1,000 >1,000 ** **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, 2 volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have PEDESTRIAN MODE been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service value defaults. volumes.) Source. Florida Department of Transportation Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Systems Implementation Office 0-49% * * 120 460 https://www.fdot.gov/plalining/systems/ 50-84% * 80 430 770 85-100% 180 520 860 >1,000 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK ° TABLE 9 Generalized Peak Hour Directional volumes for Florida's (continued) Rural Undeveloped Areas and Developed Areas Less Than 5,000 Population January 2020 INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities ASSUMPTIONS Hi hwa s Freeways Undevelo ed Developed Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(urban,rural) rural Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-8 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 2 Posted speed(mph) 70 55 55 50 50 45 45 55 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 60 60 55 55 50 50 60 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n Median(d,n,nr,r) d d n r r r n Terrain(l,r) 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 20 60 Exclusive left turn lanes(n,y) [n] y [n] y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n Facility length(mi) 18 10 10 5 5 1.9 2.2 4 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.105 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 0.095 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.550 Peak hour factor(PHF) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate(pephpl) 2,400 1,700 2,200 1,700 2,200 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 12.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 6.0 3.5 3.0 Speed Adjustment Factor(SAF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Factor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 •left turns 12 12 12 12 •right turns 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 6 2 4 4 Arrival type(1-6) 3 3 3 3 3 Signal type(a,c,p) e c a a a Cycle length(C) 90 90 60 90 90 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t t Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%, Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Highways Servicea Level Freeways Two-Lane ru Two-Lane rd Multilane ru Multilane rd Density %tsf ats %ffs Density Density B < 14 <50 <55 >83.3 <14 <14 C <22 _<65 <50 >75.0 _<22 _<22 D <29 <80 <45 >66.7 <29 <29 E <36 >80 <40 >58.3 <34 <34 Level of Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian Service Major City/Co.(ats) Score Score B >31 mph _<2.75 <2.75 C >23 mph <3.50 <3.50 D >18 mph <4.25 <4.25 E > 15 mph <5.00 <5.00 %tsf=Percent time spent following%ffs=Percent of free flow speed ats=Average travel speed ru=Rural undeveloped rd= Rural developed QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK "® APPENDIX G — Potential Solution List � L � 3 LL n o m n m a) v 3 o -2 E u c o E O v O u m Y u E E +m' c n O u a c > E n U u 3 v to E a _ - O o C cTo a aa) o m 3 a a E c a E ai p E E E u° p � u *' � L m _ V m $ m a - a o0 C: -0 m E m ' 2O m c > c a F )p 6 L a O a Y c LL a .S a LL :tt o0 00 W .;T F Ln O o Ln Icy N T C a) a a a s c Ln cm c c c T > o > > m o m o O > y .v ,a) m t ,v ,v C v io aci io io ,v Q` m. Ln Ln a bA N (n C a C a a to i+ SL CL J M 'm Q '� Q C1 J _r o- tn O O O T T T T T Y a c c m E a a a a a a m U) E ,t E E E E E E E U °c° U °�° U °c° U U °�° o f0 iy a'; v �+ CL 7 7 7 7 7 p1 p O O O O O O W W W W WV) cc O CL C v qo m t Y m O W O C O p O O O M C _ h.0 c-I m Y a aai N c a C n V E " 3 Q ho 7 .� m a O L a tw a a 7 a N a O a m > txoC U + m O U N m T U C O 0' VI 6 \ 0' a 0' a 0' U U O a p LL '- > O Y a U o a Y a c a a a _ CJ o f v °; °n 3 7 o o `o o a 'v m ° m .� aj m •tn c aa+ Y L V z a s p N v, > .E m N c 3 °C° p m N c c •> c C v m m +L.+ a c-I E U C a m m C m m m m +L-+ y a •L to m z In •+� ++ a m m .6 sa+ 7 a m 7 O_ 7 C 7 7 a > bD Q m bo i > 'n C ro ` r6 f6 bD (6 w m .� m NO N n v a m c o m v v c > ° a > > > > 0 3 CE o v a) -07 c o ° O a 7 a a a a ° a a a � aa)) t ^ a a) 7 0 7 a M 7 o > L L E m a no n Y a > °�° Y .L 6 o n °,� 3 m v a > a a a a m a E 'E o m a .- m 7 C w a a O *' 7 ,�U- -0 C - ,� +' > V a 0 aLa+ c a co 3 i ao io o a a>i O s E O ,�, O o 0 I 0 0 0 a v o > = m o 7 m u o 7 i v o a L o E -O O •- a) O 1J') C ,Y a a° 7 E m ° a o a o c o 0 0 o - a o N m V o > in m v a > 7 O w o N no U o w m O N — r- y0 fU m N N m C a m m E m w m V1 +� u °o o o - c 3 x 4 > v c v a c m > a C C -O L m a O T a O_ m O_ L O_ UA 7 Q Q — a m a nbn -o_ o s z - 7 O a O E 2 O 7 s 0 > 3 0 7 0u Ln bCA 'n E w vi b.O N v p v) m U a C U " -6 U p -0 V a O V a m CL a m 0 m Y v O m m -O m m Oo m f0 m a T s+ fL0 'O fL m (�6 V) (� T (p �' a a U m u a u m u v u — > r o F - a H m ti H a °o r a > a a a 2i 7 7 in .� > 7 > 7 7 7 '� Q a i N m 7 E C V a E Y Co a a E V C O a N -O > -o L a) -0 7 -6 L v F F N C m a S 7 v a E 'p > -0 1 a c -0 -0 7 c >. C v c 7 ro o O Q v O \ a 0 x O a ,n O -o o > L a C > O a 'O O O a O O o a) O O a O p a p m > p C p L m p a O m ¢ O CL cC m U Q U Cl m CO V Y CJ v) in u U v) LL CG LL LL Z Q LL o LL .� — LL [C a x .� ai ai a) a) ai ai a a a a a a a a) v v v v v Y T T T T T T T T T T T a a a)a a)a a a a a a a a a a Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Q � t �n �D r, co m a a c-I N M Ln lD n 00 c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I a a F C a L M 0 c v a o 3 LL a LL w 3 Y Q) L + N n o +u a o L C o E L — O 'O , > cm v -° 0 o W a o � o > T iif S U V n f0 a O_ C a >' 7 U C V p 7 L - L 4 V N w O a _ ° a u v o 76 N T 0 N a) C m L Y C E C C 0 H _ 0 'u m Y 0 V N N O Q � bA mQ Uu a C O N uLL N + N N ° O L Y p O a u ° H c au au au au au 3 u a° a) a O O O O 0 N \ 0 U > -0 LL a c a a a a a 0 o on N °o u E u a a a a a a ai C u ° E E E E E E � u _O � 2 qC LL LL LLt LLEr t6 3 4ro VN°° °U 2 2 L ° OE ,NO C0pa m m to v n m UO O O O � O t U0 O ° aEO aallo mo � � F LE O O O O O s - oov Va a a cT XL c-I c-I c-I N Ol tT N cal I, 00 l.L L!1 Ol c-I 0) IT m m 0 rn m Ln O 66 N C � a T T T pTn C Y > C C C t6 t6 ro >. O> ra 0 Oro Oro O 0 i ro 1 0- In 0 co F Q Q a N lJ. rr rr rr O ncn O O O J — N O o T Y ? a o f ro E o f o f o f a O r+ 0 a a 2 a a 2 a M t N .E ti )n o )n o )n o )n o )n o E E E E E U °°° E E L Y N.: 0 O O Q Q Y +a+ Y a a N L on E 0 O O O O 0 0 0 C: c O 'ccO 'ccO OC C N M In J J W G G CL - a a C L Q) sL+ a bA - pan y.a i pn a E '� C to GI a C O -0 .V w — `0 N C ro O GO c N E E ^ ° v ° > p 0 0 ° _ a z - a c C a O -O C a V E ra a) V7 ? U > 'C W s+ — 'O C U a C ra LL w m �p a L U pn -° _ -° Y r6 -° u ro O N O i V a) E > 3 yo L c p ro � o °n rr m c o v u v ° > O ° ° o N rr c � a ° n a a ° o 0 o a a ° n c a O E w a .2 ra .- O u au° �_ T u T L - w > _ + a O > O m > C pn a C N a a a a L E N a aa+ O L _ L1 _ C .`J m N a en Q •� 0 > a s O Y 7 +. aa) E u U N +.+ m j aj -O a ca Q E Y L a a m° y +O '> a '6 v > N m o a �N an c m a6 c o a0 a 0 a) a v > 0 0 o aj v >a L a v 2 u E ° L O N a a tr N i Q O a — fa O > > - po O a m a a O pn 0 > Y u — E 0 pn N N \ val a U C u U N L aL.+ w 1E > � vai 0 N ro Y .� > V O c O O N to t to O bA a N to — O 'i 0 a+ '� O ra N C rn w 'O N t0 ra >, K >, p L C O ° t0 O V bf] \ \ m O N Q -6 T N a) E a o Y o 0 a ° ^ a c ac ° 0 ° 0 ° > La m > u m c o Y o 3 T pn ° a o ^ -° 3 ca .X °o v Q) c a c a Y m O cm pn pn a C N > O '~ > -O x O N c N C _ '� r%1 ° +� a ° o c ? = E a v > a a c s o Q v T 0 O T E O. 0 O — fo +� U a (6 O C N C 7 V -0 E o _ ° ° 0 c i o x a O ° ° -° 0 0 > a a a O V 0 0 - E o a 0- u O N c _ u '- 2 0 > pA a hA F- > >' C m [2 -O U m u N L Q a -O — a) '— in C C in w 0 as c 3 c t F Y pn c c y o f a °a E Y o o o v ++ a ra ra O V O w > > pn > +a+ 2 i� > Z u �' bA N H ro = u ra vuai u r° o 3 c 0 'E ° O c c o 0 v 0 a a 0 v ° c 0 ° N a ._ N +° a s ° L .� > 3 a a pn Y o x a N a a N o n > c o a c 0 0_ m c N O ° -0 c U a c u v a„� a .� Y '� ° o E a pn o > .� o •- E o o a L i 0 ° c o U 0 a 0 a LL n a N a W m - m cc ._ a 'v a W o v 3 ._ m U a N LL N a v a ._ v E elf- >, T a+ a+ a+ a+ a+ C C C C C C Y IV N N N N c c Y T T T T T Y Y Y Y Y Y a a a a a U U U U U U Y Y Y Y Y O O O O O O u N N Ln N N N u O 0 Of Vc-I c-I c-I c-1 N c-I c-I N N M N 'O LO LD LD c-I N N c-I c-I ry N N Vl :6 c u Gal...... c-I N M O c-I N M Ln LD n N N N N N N a a T LL m 7 V m Y m C N N C a Q m i i — bA O N E a v Q ncn E T E a) U Q m V N N L a) m a) yn 0 T 3 m Y g o ° o 3 o ao C V 7 a U 7 L U (D i in 4 C a, O O O Q u C 0 in m E Q 4 L w � O �n C � m o V •E O s E m ° Y E > E L Y v O U al U N O m O -p O C E L in O 0 �a +L.+ m E C .� C L O ° O Q Q ,� — ._ on . c Y E o f o aa)) aa)) aa)) E v Ln v > au 3 > — ._ u '' ' - 0 0 o n O u m o \ C D_ LL LL O v Q O L d p C E m f6 — v v v C � .£ ° o ° v v E ^ o -' 6 E E E o Cr O V E c v a E c c � v L a m `6 O a1 O cELa c O c a! m O U m o o on bn nn ° 0 ° ° m .E v an $ c c a n _ o 0 0 m Q E 0 — c o 0 o m 0 d d a u .� m u o .6 a ma a - „ c ++ T .0 'C .0 F H m aJ O o N F m _ to C a+ -O .tn O ++ ++ O a L "O O O a) O O 0 O O L a L �^ O a) O a) �^ cc O a.::...: LL G d C2 d d N N -0 m Q -6 LL of Il C) N N LL O Ln O Ln ~ M Lo 1, Bn on O m m (v Q Q >, O O m () >, tlntio d io -3p '36 N N a) m ro m O L G CL V Q LL°. LL°. m N Q Q m VI 49 H E O J J O O N O o T Y ar m E m E m E v m E O r+ 7 a L N a M i a CO U) E t; E E E E n o o n o E E E U c n o E E O O O +a + - m O a v i+ Q tln tln Y Q Y Q Y a-+ F Q Y a- Op -0LL O p c cc WC -L— � — � Ln G a° Ln v ai a) ° to y a toN > 0 ti o E .., c c > - u u Ln O 'c a) N '� m cc Y m m u '� p ' a) � QC E o 0 c !E > \ m c 3 a aj C O > '6 w a m L U Y C O O 6 C O : 3 N O m -O > U m >> u �n m m m V w �- u p` 3 u ° o ° 'n '' � °J m a) w c > > -0 E C) ° -co Co u v ° a) bn o c Y m O L ° v E m E c - m `m to >, p 'O m — u ._ ._ m o � o � > Y o 0 Y v Q > m° v v ° E Co u m ° O p un ca OL Y Y L m ° m a) p L C -0 +' p_ u �+ > m C L of m U al a) w C d' t a) a) E L ca N L C m i — c n E Y O U C Q Y O L O 7a O c }' a) Q ha m '6 -6 m (6 > m V7 E Co c°n .� v 0o c E s E c > 'c o Y -' ° a u O w N N w oC u E yo ME ° E v s '� 0 oL V o° m m O a v .— ms L m p 'in m e ° L '� -p `� c o C c ,� " o u o L v m LL ti ti v E > m O Q vmi N > p E N m N cmi a) CO Q d U = 'O C E O DC C p N y O O Y O O a) c m m (o a) vi \ i + Q O N O O 0 w w Up OD U E a) al L h a C _ bn 2i O O u a > 6 u m Q U T T N w _ Q = °- C m O U U 7 O V m O 7 O) 7 7 C D m O m m0 > Q tlm9 bn bA m bA i Q >, LbA �n N U in in bD in 0 w hA N Cp v O V) a) cn — h m 0 +' 0 cCo rCo E T m .E m m c .Q O .Q O m M m v m U rL m �'' a+ m a+ 4 �+ C N C �.. Y V — ._ ++ ++ : u L u m c) m m N u y u m u cn u m F O `0 V 7 w Q 7 -p 7 m i vUt C vUi 0 7 Vl 7 L 7 U a) W 7 O : " co 3 .� a3i aj 0 cco 0 v°i .E E a -0 m O U -a C) L 0 N — v :.� U p a) ° O w L O -O a) m L m p O bD O O i O a) O .� S LL m U O U V Vf oc J u J ++ U '� � U m U m LL -6 m � d' .E V W W T ? T > > T T N N N N Q) m m a) a) a) a) a) a) a) Y Y Y Y Y ° ° Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y c C C c c Cc Q Q Q Q Q 7 u 7 N Y m m m m m m m Q Q Q Q Q Lo Y M Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O O O O O U u u u U U U U U N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cr of .5 L3D no nn on 3 3 Co m m m m O IQ V' :O al' N N L!1 lD c-1 N N M lD c-1 M Q N c u C CO m O c-I fV M Vl lD 1- m m N N M M M M M M M M M M 41 aJ ` O 0 a O L -O C a .tL' N N C E O cai u co 3 o Y O N a V O r_ru N C T T O N a a O .0 a C u C N 0 7 7 a C V) VI � � Q O.:,.... bCp E K _T U T V a T N s _ F _ a a a o u a - E O ro O a n E Y p J u F r a a N y O F O ~ �° u a u u u v p 0 p 0 a u o •3 a a Y a a a a LL D LL D ,� T o o o 0 o 0 0 0 o > C CO d d C (i d tl d O bbn o Lbn Ll 7 N a 7 7 +E in Y ° L T a a L a a a a C ° C ° U E E v E E E � � a Zr ° m V O° O (L N Q T N N (6 -6 a a L b0 N \ U of b0 ba bn bn b4 N m F c O O .— O O O O a a 7 O O 0 v 7 a a E a a LL a a E cu E E E t ° u F F .� a F F F a F o ° o ° 3 E .a v '0 0• L O O O O O '0 O u a u a Q saj n p ° in p u .E H n o 2 o a° co w 00 N 1.0 00 00 00 rn o m rl r, Ln rn rn rn F W N a) 1- Ln r, 00 00 00 O It n �t t N It -;zr T W rC � 'v a ?+ to v_ aan 3 onwban on ° v d° 1 3 v v a o w a) w w ,., L ro L L L L a by ro L r0 r0 ro co L rp m CL U +� 0 m m m m ° Ln m Ln Ln Ln 0 y a CL O b0 J - CL n y O O O T T Y ? M a o f o f o f `o E `o E o f `o E o f o f O - 3 m a Y Ya Y a YM Fa YM Fa Yro Fa aM t a a a � �n bD ba bA bD a bn u u ba by W W to cm 0 0 0 0 . E E E a a _ .� o O O O Oa: a a a L., a O O O O O Y Y F 7 F 7 p L p _ L p ° LL ° LL O > O O M - 0 0 •+ C C W N W C C C C - a a d w rn a Oa ° c Y .+ co a O ra _C 00 -6 ° ° V aL+ a ro bn N a a 3 0 ro Q L O •— a -O -6 bn N ,C a .� i C C _ K 00 Q1 m b4 aL-+ L p _ U O a 7 O• N (6 Y N a N -O O 7 O c CLn 6 m 3 OL C C .� ba W O1 0 n a) — 6 O C a v u O N a C V a` M bo c�c m` a Y bn m 3 a m cm o a C E 2 N tw Q Ln 7 G _ an V +-' C a a N O .L r0 U 'i f6 O '6 L •_ .2 ci O a N O N U p L ai a p E CO C C bn 'i a 7 .Q 3 C V � C > O ro L w C b0 7 C a a Ln E O L L — — — — a r0 a m Y > c o a o ° ° o L 3 v u m o a o n `a m aEi ° ° p E .9 Y a° Ln g >- > L Y Y O C a w — N N 'CL C a — CL L 0 o to E b°0 bbn o c a) a u w m p N Y E L — a a 0 E ° .� a ui O E o 7 v� o ° v O 0 a V oN 7 a -0 ^ v v s a 0 m o E a a 0 a o n0 c Y a c a o ti4 ' a C a Ln '� L Q Q — ) L L L > N C bC0 �n 70 sL+ C f0 > 7 L " +-' rO •L a an O '— V c '+_ a c cm E a a `� a .— a " Y .E j a 2 on En =3 1E oN -o OV .O co c p vo bn o a m >a) w -0 O o a wa ba p '.....0 L LL .2 . m a a a T m N L -O m � .2 a -° E Y Y fa C u V `" K K K Q1 _ V +' m u C ,� V K l0 a p m aa+ bD bq C fo a L r6 7 vai i ° a a a O Q F w > 7 0 N a V N V 3 u co •C = 7 'p^ Lj a -o � ai 7 -o -o -a o ° O o = cT -0 ms O ai -o o a �' m o- > ° � o 3 72 L a 0 o a o a p ° o u p o a Vl o o a s o a ra CL d' m V .0 K N m m m LL = LL E m U O LL .� m d' � N V p V V 4 V m T rya r�0 r�0 r�o coo r�0 r�0 ra a O O O O O O O O >T T T T T T Y L L L L L L a a a a a a 0 ro ro b ro b ro ro r6 Y Y Y Y Y Y a b7n v b70 v b7n a) b7n ai °7n v b7n CU b7n v a a a a a a a Y N Y rn Y Ln Y Ln Y rn Y N Y rn Y rn Y O O O O O O a a a a a a a a 7 � 7 7 7 7 E 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 °- u u u u u u J J J J J J J° 7 tn j, V7 N N m N N 0 a': -4 N lD N O O c-I N -1 c4 tD -1 -1 -1 -4 O',. lD c-1 a-1 f u C N m Ln w 1-- m O c-I N M � Ln to r,'.Ll In Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln a , a c Y W � � c m Q a VI a E i N 00 o v E a V u pO->' N �in Q U C O N .0 i O E c >, O O c u O O O 7 U T V E E v E m U O2 O O w a O i O O .� rTo EO O 0 c Y t E y V i 'r+ O a Y p > O O m u c \ a r_O .ao) .. ao� „c u .au+i .au+iY p a o spau+ .pau+ .pau.+ C... a O u .O m c0 a '6 -0 E _ C N mO c: a a 0 J U m ona a a a a a a E E o w o x a O > C7 — > E E E E E E 0 E E _0 E a Q +� as E E E E E E U = O v a O O cc� c a r� rL rL rL �a m do a) E - L a 0 a a x w uo ao ca na on o o to _ E a 0 0 0 0 0 0 u ai o a a °' v v v v .a, m ai c c i d a a a a a H F c 'c '� 'u u 'tA i LL - F F F H F H °o O O a 0 = m = m 0 c 0 a > a O O O O O O v C] p o a o cc o a a E c L 0 a o 0 0 0 M M Q LL LL a OC a G a m p }+ m it W L LL LL LL LL LL LL o Ln r, Lo N m (14 00 m m 00 rr V1 VI :..1-...... a) 1- 00 00 1- 1- 1, r, -Zt -Zt �t 66 C a > cm T T T T c T T W a 0 3 aan T 3 3 3 tw O 3 3 w txo w oan y a v -o -0 -0 o o -0 -0 0 0 0 _ 12 Q m a 0 m` cn 0 0 0 F m n H ' O o m O m J N O o T T Y E o E v `o E o E o f o f o f o f O + t a a . ro L M M M M M n M °° iL N E ° onnoinE m u0 o o o o f0 a rn' a a Y v v a, a� .� 'ia p a p a ~p a p~ a ~p a p~ a C £ OA 0D tl0 O~ �m Yp Yp D Yp Q Yp � Yp � Ypa y'n W C N G J J J J �LL W a a _ d `o a a a a w a c ,C c -0 ,N a c O ? c U a m ti c O c m a i O a m > D a O In 0 >' C a a+ m 3 c L c m a O v Q a bn f0 on N 0 N O v o U L m c V m c c c c O a) m '� 0 O L m N n O U 0 L 0 p a J a 0 C Lq O I� L c >' -0 a ��, w u_ a a 'in OJ x U U N u c +�+ >i '6 c ra a E O c = L c M N 2 c c io cc T c O L +L-� ut a is a O 7 G a .� a a—a� ut m LL 00 U co 2 L 2 N m L m m y E u ,�- C +a+ O a `� u > m c N c N a a > O Q m L 0 .- N O a O m m m X U m H a1 Cl i .i 00 O c '- 00 U N - -6 LO c-I O V O O N u i u O U N Ol f6 (6 f6 (6 Y ur Ln Y Y w v N w v w a > 0 as m o tw m m u u n u u O c a Con > T T c T m 7 L a O C a a a a a N o a c v c 0 0 6 ° a s 2 2 o o O o o Y 0 0 0 0 o 0 o E a Q M o N 0 N N 0 a .y 0 n E a a o a a 7 O -0 m T O T T .�- a y0 u V ti o V L 4 L L c m T E o L ti4 •x o a to m c v E E m m _0 m m L w N - .V - z _ N c `� u c O_ m d O O L L c L L y a v a0 0 _0 v n E E 'c s o 'c n Q L _ a a m a a _ O v \ a ._ v 0 c 0 o u c O v ^ ti ti 0 0 O �_ o E T m m o m m x m m c o o u c m -O > Y w -6 w ,� '� Q a O_ u bD m D D � c-I � O � a `� p _� c m w m c m m ¢ m _0 E m >, `� c E a a O- O O- O O- O Q 4 u tr M m \ O O N a +� m u u K tr K K ol O Ft m a 3 en Y 0 x 10 0 °A — � " L - w a a a a a a a a F m 0p r' a C '� -O yL,, '6 0A U c -p i i Y a U O O 0A 00 00 0A tla 0D m `~ oo '> .0 c 0 c 0 c c .m i c •� O c -p -o -o -o -o -o -o -o 00 L c a 'i a bf] ,u O p O 0 O Q O m t O a 0 c a a 'i LL LL m m CC 'ut > u N U m U �- U a ut � U w LL 'ut m CC CC CO CO m CO CO maj m > N N y N a) N N N N N N N N N N N y seL y y y y y y y y y y y y y > -0 - a a a a a a a a a a a a a YO O 0 c c c c c c c c c c c c c m m a •nn •nn •on •nn •na •W .49 •W •W •W •W •na •nn CC m m m m m m m 0o m m m co m J '- m V,. m c-I N .--I M N M � N N N .--I c-I N N N N ;Q �` N lD lD c-I N fV N N N lD O O lD kL tD C7 : N m Q u Gal...... c 00 O O c-I N M Gfl lD 1- 00 m O 1- N yl Ln Ln lD lD lD lD lD lD lD r lD lD lD n n n a_> 3a C � o � x OY Q) v m a D Y — YtioV Y F Z > a a) a v O a L cLo p E H a E •3 E C O u O O a o > a > L v > a a a n c s o -0 a p u a E CL N V a -p O N co 6 a �n a vL a u al tlq a U O iJ ` u j u u T a 0 p +� c £ 2 E v E a a a a V N V yj O O O V V u v Y VI u i� c u r6 r6 u f6 N l0 a a aL a a o a o n E E c E E v v � " E E E E E m a3 E T E E E a u u a u a u Y L - � o ao �_ np u`n v o O E 'm _ _ mo O a J a O a L co ro co — c ra a v V Y O .a O~ O~ = a a a a a C: a Er 2N O O O O 7 O O L a O Q_ LL a LL a a a a s a Y a: a :tt N ti N 2 oo r� Ln LL N CO n O N to m G N �t M LL rC ti E ?+ c bD T c Cc: T yL a) T O >. T a y oan a - E 3 - - nn 3 aao a -O L a) .� v -O is is a a rLo _ cn m O cn u Ln In J°-° r n a F m 0 :r...... O O O J N O 0-_, Y m 2 �5 E E a E O Y 7 a 2 a 2 a f ro fA - o Ln YE YE YE YEi YE 0 a a i E E _a,E a,E a aUS D Q LL L L Y £ p p p o o o O o C: E ncn rn rn � V) f) 4. M ro a o v an o a al y a m a o `o a m n L E a E ° O fa a a O C7 c c O `� 0 � u a 3 in Q. m c Uq c O •N p p a ,� -O Q N ra L a L V r6 'rn c V O N 'O _O cy N a a O O .� L O Q o C a a O U a N L a z 3 c Y o V > > v D v o o ¢ o o o .9 -0 o Q c E o n c m c 3 � u L y c m y T l o 0 c _ on CC: w O a L C w r6 tL _ O CO 7 L -7 +�-' ra c O '3 N ci L f0 U L c N N •N T '� a) C) N 3 -6 G �n Z cy �' LA to 'O U C O -O M N L + 2 .6 N N O f° `ro U U = c `� O -O ppp 'ur a) N c L L a -6 E -6 -p — sL+ O a r^ N a c c aL-+ 0 c L -p vi aj O " .� vL Y Q a) a) 7 -6 c O a c c_ >. y c 0) L an L a — O i ro Ou c L O a a) 3 a OL ~ YO ra O a Y N N a Y YO a O YO u pq C E p C V a cy UA O 7 O U T a c u _ a m o E V o a o r E S T D u T °; u E t4 E c a M > ro O o � O vai 7 a c a c c: O a Y j a 7 u a 4 a N L 'a6 N rEa O 0 T T C O r6 >' i ro a Y Y a > 'O K m V Y a O L w ra c - u 'a - N vl Q c E .°q - a) 4 o T o a o T CL L c�c -' a .L •� on a Y c 'Vt (6 'in rp c �n a -6 2 V -0 O G C f0 L Y Y V c N N i L fU L (6 N 'X �1 7 7 a rC! L41 H o 3 O a y ' ^ v ° i a .E � v o a) w a f0 fU w (6 z -O Y c (O N f0 fL C c V > f0 ._ Y M Y �, Y O p a -p O Y M tr 0 > > T U M U Y u 0 N a u c u Y U ' L ._ vi v) a u M a o u 3 0 � � E c ro n � a = c °1 a a o E a s 'E a o E o o Z ° v a s p w F Y ° on a s O Y O a > -O c C (a c 7 yL a c c C O L u a c ,U O O m p O O O Ln E O Y O Lfl O O j( p L O u Ci [O .� m N ra > V ti CJ N Y OC U H m Q u CJ c-i V Y U a LL O Y 4 CJ O aT aT) a Y ro c c c c c c c c c c c Y ro O O O O O O O O O O O L L L L L L L L L Y c O O a 2 2 � � ro ra ra ro ra ro ra to ra on co ro 2E :2 m L L m m _ c :m V.... N M M c-I M N M N M O .a' c-I to Ln ci (y c-I c-I M c-I N fV c-I c-I N O',. ci N M M c-1 f u C M Ln m n m O O c-I N M Ln m n °1 n r, r, r, r, m m W r" m m m m a o = a' O > a LL V d4 a J O V C LL 4 L >. .a b a C v }' o J Y U 3 U a c -0O O 16 O .0 a Y 0 4 0 L Y 6 a LL Y ro a bD O a) a C Q C E +L-+ p N + E a L N a a o c v o O a u u w y a U V V V V 3 O s O O O O O a O 'C o v a` a a a a` I- v ri a ° Y v N N N d d Qj N E L E v E E E E E E u `o E 3 v m u C Y bn �" bA bD bD bn in b0 bn O O O O O o O p v .� c a N E a a a a a � a L a .� a F F F F a F rb F s a o O � O O O O 'o OQ Oo 4 " CC m U C7 o a LL LL r, M M M LL O N M Ln lD N N N n N 1, O LD Lr) t -;zr ' to bq a bA a a c ro r0 T rOo ro a a a a T T a T W aao O v v o o 40 on v v o v a � Q N, F p_ bD bD �n m m m m N N m rn N E O w W w J — n in i) N O O T T T T T T Y a o E o E `o E `o E o E o E o E U) a 7 bn 7 bn 7 bn 7 bn 7 tin 7 nn T tw > bn T bD T T oA T np T np E t U N .0 N .0 U E U f0 v a a; ib ib ib io ib ib O a O O a` O a` O a` O a O a +� :£. O rb O rb O T O N O rp O rb LL o LL o LL o LL o LL o LL LL o O d — O > > > > > > c c c c c 3 c 3 c O J LL W LL W LL W LL W LL W LL LU — — — — — — — T _ 00 a Y _6 �' a i a Ol a O O 7 O .--I L C N � (b > � � C lD E a.+ O 4 'vi w on u N Y N '-' O N N c-I Oi 00 00 (CO � w O C N a *' N -O v`i — O Q N D N U >- � dt C aT+ N a 7 >' 7 CO 7 '6 4/ 7 a +a.' 7 7 bn i 61 c-I a in C Y a O a ._ f6 ' = N a s a c N a ate+ d c In bo p Y '> _ a, 3 d L 0 N d N LJ N 0 O a _O U O L 'cc— ri a+ O V L rb bn -6 a V N 0 i 7 f6 ° t6 G rb N N U r6 C U N -6 bn i L Q Lj O' a b0 3 M C M j b0 C 7 U b0 M u m O 0) m a C a C .Y a C a a s+ C a Ln -O (6 E aa, m o m a> m v m m m E v o m w o a 7 7o a o " E 7 a 7 N 7 c ° J a v m a a a a _ ti mcm „ L v `° c 11 `° � `° m c f6 a — j cv a o V Y c ra cb ai co c a>i +� y ° o aa)i rb a s > a ro O L c N N c a N bn N .L N U N c bn N o a > a U v > '� O a > a O a 4 a 'O a m .� C a N C >' r6 f6 a V C V a'i' � .V N V a V C .V N V N .V C a aj L Y L sN+ Q Y F+ +a' > E, 9; E '~ N E rb C ta) > O c O ,.. O O -° O C a n ° T 2 N N — 7 N N N f/7 N a s N (O a s L 0 a 0 c-I O 7 fa 7 C ° C aN+ C N C C a C E C aN+ a' bA •rp U a s ° a O O }Li O _ CL a O_ a a Ln a N a o 7 ° bn a a bn d a urn L O C bn .x o a o C E 'N ° > E m o o rn ° b m 0 c `� N c 4 f0 = c .0 rb - a a L O Ln OL L c c L O Q Y `� Q Q L Q .0 Q � O L Q U bA CO N by _ a T a -° a � 7 G c 7 `'' O o n O I O on O O E rb O m a Y ti i -0 Y m : o 0 Qx ° V c V a V a v va u ° 7 V n m N m` 7 4 X 7 a o C E w a w w 3 a w v w a a o w � m o a N ° a s a > b 0 c6 N a a rb rL E .> bA O L rLp c0 C C:::.LO 01 a aT+ N sL+ -O a a Y u 7 C bn F a O F F 7 O F 'C F Q O F O L O N Y a aOf rb a F — F '. F E F F i U F n E N bn bn '7 a bn F N - '- O o o N o L O 0 ` O _ _ ._ C O C O x _ — [i U a Lv Li E a b v m m n O O va m m i 3 m o c c c c C c C C c C C C C T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7, L L L L L L L L L L L L L ° L a ,� Y Y Y Y ,� +, Y Y Y Y Y Y Y o T C G G G G C G G G G G G G N M M .--I c-I M M c-1 M N LD LD LD c-I c-I LD -1 0 c 00 Ln LD I, 00 m 00 m O 11 N M O O 00 a) a) a) 01 Ol 0 00 0) 01 a) a) a) a a C v a Q E fa O 3 to O co E w LL N O a E al in O_ a) 0 3 E '° 3 E o N E I o f ° ° .°°° V �n U N 0 N 'O 00 C a) N E aJ d L Y c6 E C O '0 O O '� U a) Y Q a) O L (6 L L f0 N U M �..� a) E E u aj U L O L L O V L al , u u V U V) U U +-' U +-' +-� V O_ 3 w 3 3 w E 3 a a a) a) a) a) o C ' O O O O d p O i) O U a) a) a) a) a) a) -Q E o o a E E E E E E O u o `o o `o E 3 M m M m M M aaii i o N 0 o N oai o 0 0 0 o o ° — ° — -Fa — — .— ° p 2 0 0- 0 a) N a) a3 a) — L a) .N O_ O_ D_ CL U O_ O_ aJ a) • 76 •� Q •� 76 E N •3 ._ H H H H H H H 'O s a ai cr +O+ Y a o ra O O O O O O O a) o a) u a) o o M a) u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M LLo Q....:.. cc LL N LL D_ VI CC to U ( LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 00 00 O O N m LL lD a) -Zt M I, 00 C) F.....:'. 41 rl 00 �t w c-I 00 0 c-I lD Ol lD N M M T Y a C 0Abn b0 � O O T T On to w tto N p V ~ m m m Q J J a) J o- y O p O o Y ar E E E E E E E O " v E v a) a) 2 a) 2 a) 2 a) C .� T T T T T T T E E n o o ui o ui o o o N o E °) Op a 0 LL ~O LL ~O LL ~O LL ~O LL ~p a v a+ Q +• +� +� •'" 00 oa 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y +J C C - 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 ac O C G G G J J C �: 3 C �: C �: C �: �: �: G a v `o a) I M \ Y E u a) 0 v . a0 — - a v Q) O m -° v 6 0 v o v ^ o E ea v °° — E 0 w _ — — ° C a) O 'O M Y 'C ro a) -O V 01 L!1 C > ° E00 aT+ � i +.+ E U U t' N — f6 -° U E m 4 ^ n3 ° a) (� C N U r0 '6 N `^ O m U 00 — a) O L O — '> E Z3 Q L O_ L C '" u N ,v V °- K > C v o N °° n o a > .E > 0 E c Y v F v g ° 0 v . _ o Q y vi L of N '> � E U (0 O E N — �n a) E O ' N w O 0 E O N .L a, F C00 0 M '0 N v v o — L v — a n) _ _ w _ VI `) E >O ai E N is Y w Y U N E � � 0 � L C: -O fo C a N ca v o- 0 c E Eo v > m ° o o az o _ io is cc O •u o E v E ° c o ° o ° u o ; co ° u u E ^ v E a6 0 f6 tla)9 .� ._ c0 L T E E u +' 7 L vt a) a) ° ° b0 �n o O Y E o � a >' C E -0 V N 7 7 Q 7 ON N -0 ° N p O° O° , � r- C6 EO w -0 nz v E E ° 0 � -a Q ° ° -° ° a o E cc m u O o C N N > O >In N : >O w .x ° C 1w, 0 OA -° O a) '� O al = O v E w ° E L L 0A 0 1 -cm N E txc `0 a+ E a) ° (E6 Q E >^ H ° ° O 'E 4 O ai E O_ E U N EM f0 0 a t Y u M E .E 'O fi 'N vt a) p E 7 O V i i f0 O a) E O al sue+ 00 7 aS 47 bn Q -6 y O O Lw O Vf U w E E U E O_ N — n7 n7 CJ^1txo O > b4 aL-+ V ai (6 E a) T (0 (0 (0 N ai E .� (6 -O E E O_ O_ E E E f0 E (0 bA p E E a) a3 a) a, 'o- o 'Q u N u ^ — u 7 u u > to vUUi �) �' bf) `^ m K 00 u uu " a) ,� w `) > , U 7 '6 7 ^ Q 7 u 7 O1 7 O 0A 7 E E f0 a) O cu O Q) O O E ar -6 E -O — N 'O a) 'O '6 E L 'O L i bb w -O w -O > ^ O 'O _ Q E O E L 0 i E � 00 -O 00 E -6 E a) +� O O O E m O E 7 O t0 L 'i c0 O to E L ._ U O_ N w m ._. m .� J CD J V LL � LL' U ._ c6 f0 f0 f6 a3 a5 10 2 12 `c0 E E E E w `o 0 0 0 `o 0 0 0 o 0 `0 3 u 3 u Y E E E E E E E E E E E o 0 0 0 aS f0 f0 f6 fL (6 (0 f0 ai aS ai J M J M C N VI VI N VI N Vf Vf VI N to C C � G G � N N N M M Q ��- c-1 N M M N lD lD 4 ;1- L!1 lD ID N C '. m Vl 1.0 1l 00 a) O c-I N m L!1 w aJ O O O O O O O �--i a ti ti N � ti ti N � N ti ti ti ti N a 3 3 U V O U O fl -0 7 E C J V 7 O_ •— o -O w a1 Q 'O aT+ ._ O a C y� •— m O t C ate+ m C C O O m U u " � V 7 •— L m Q v o o c y a E '6 E O — Y u 'O O V p N 3 m O T o = > U ¢ n s 3 m Y 3 -O CO \ m = C y _ w o 5` L > m u a) o + m m U c L L O N au) 3 p ua ° E r 3 tin a, u m p m d O c p ' L > U N m c C C a) E .� O C c +J E 'O O — vi ._ o cu •� c a)O ) x Y C <6 •O� C U c O uu ) C a c O E a) _0 0- c p ) m c O 1 Cm mE Q >Q F N 6 O '> a v Y > v °� u cr o "O a) u 0 C a) O y a) > O u a) 4 m LL w L a u ¢ a m cc F m LL � oA t T T Cc Q) c N � i c T O m a) O m m m T T \ T T O \ On w 6 v a a) � w w o c w w L O y,. m mL OA C b4 m m .� V1 V1 N 'O L m, In Q O m In Q C .— c InQ ._ m ._ m m •0 E O o on w a Q O o N O o Y 7 -M N E O > �' E E £E £ o a �' Y4Lf 4Lf o Q C) C� U O O O O O a m oA _O C C a) � _0 to a) m O N m C C Y c m m > m I c ate-+ C vt a) m O m a) O cy Ln .� a) C O u c U N �- E c 00 N C 0 c m L L N Y O 0 C a) i a) D O i C u 0 Vf J a) i aJ i N a) O U O N a) m u �_ O m 4) '6 N a) Y a) a a) a) m N 7 u N a) a) c j m Y N a) V a o c c `a Y L' o f v u c o ° ac) to oa o W v rn a) V) a>) is a) n c > n a 6 E m L m 5 m > o ° ¢ m c E °� a) ° E o E - c .Q m c c n m `c° w c to m `-' o > c u o N + a - o m p - m o a no a m L a) ¢ o o � n Y c E n p E a) Q c u u on v v _ m c ._ � v aj E v c a) > p c � v 3 n L c c c a) E ° c v T > m o a .° m m N a m m ° p E a) > Q v m ^ _ ¢ c o n rn 3 W aE W � Q m m a o > ° ° m o a) w � au) C Lba c �] a0 O aJ c V7 in c O O_ c c m L .? m O Q C � c u E -6 c V '^ o E �- c g s n ° E v o o > v ago N a v L i i u DQ 'O L a1 T >' on m > L L m L c v Q c m v J o o m E a 'V m O 'O al O `^ a1 U aJ O N > O m > -O C > >, T > �+ — E -O cif aL+ b4 Q 0 O L - O > cn T m O T +� m > v L E ,c 6 - o v m w m o - m ¢ m o a N o o t 0..... T bD T io `� 'C F ? ra N j O T C E U T Y 4 C T m mi a1 N +- tl0 o c c m a >_ o -0 a m a) o m c n m a) c -0 0 u o o _ c C S O 7 U U C a) -0 m u 7 vt U U 4I1 Vt m in C C fl_ F in C C a) v L p in al y C w U m v on o v 3 a p o o J v 0 m a m E .o c m > m E .o ^ c m y c E 2 0 m m _ m m m o m E > Y u c u a) u o u •" m u a) v O m a) N O u m cO > O N u u m u � u u m u u cu O O m 7 p ,v„ o v 7 >p io c .� is v o a) 3 m Y c ,v„ o 7 m 2 o c o p o p c bD 'p 7 m O O a O C O n O U C) a a — L Q C Y C O_ a) N c -O C Q a) m N E m m m c 'O > 'O ._ a) a) c D c 'O C c C Q a L o o f a) o '- o E > u - o > p o c a, c .0 > o o N o m o c o E [i c) n u cc v m y _ w O H w o V m m > ¢ U o v E O F v ¢ v uu aa) aa) aT) a) Y Y Y - O O O O o O O O O o c c c E La F F Ep ED LD LD Ep F i0 > : .O O O N O C m m m m m m m m m m W — — — �" u J J J J J J J J J J L Y m m m a) > T T T T T T T T T T m v a, a) a) ar a) a) a) a, a) C c C m F Y Y se Se Y Y Y Y Y Y m m m CL CL d ,u c-I M c-I N M M Q.. M N �--j 0 C I- 00 m N O c-I N M Ln lD I, 00 m O N c-I c-I c-I W N N N N N N N N N N M a1 cy c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I rl c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I a) a j Q J N a a J a a a nn n N 7 3 C 3 -6 C N fNL C O a CL N 6 7 i U N C _ 2 a i .0 Y OD > 'Q C a V O C ro a a O O >O _T .a O r7 °- CL = (6 ao a N a O Q C y a V N to E aL+ U O r C V Q � y O O+5.+ u u u u � w y v u a a a a LL i .3 w .3 0 0 0 0 7 C Q" H C — C vl C ai C) T O O -Q O LL d d d o a a s o Q Q w a a a a C � u `o E 3 3 c `o `o v ° 4 u u 0 0 0 o ac c Q q a� :� c c u v v LL LL LL LL v s a o o O O O O u C a o aai a :.Q.....:: CC m U C7 U ++ K LL K LL LL LL LL 0' 2t a N Lr) N Dl O Q7 O O c M Lll lD tio r v a ?+ C C Ctxo E i t' O O O O Y +T+ rcco O a On -M -ML -Q a a f0 \ (6 '6 -Q -Q a Q h0 N (6 n c c6 t0 t0 f0 :. r CL Q CL J VI VI Q C CL 0 0 0 N N O O O O E O J E N y p O T T T T Y a' c c c `o E o f o f o f o f p � 3 � � � U) a '0 7 UO 7 t]n 7 bA 7 bA TbD T T bD bD T bA E D E E E E E E U c c� c U c c� c n o n o n o n o n o O O O O O O fp O fp O N O N LL O LL O LL p LL o LL o w w w w CL p u m a T T T a O at: O O 7 _6 _6 a Y � �' a-+ a t�6 a � c-I w •N aL+ to j in ti O C Y M 00 O 7 Q. O = C t6 �O N -0 C f6 (6 m i G v a co u u c v a E m '� o s D o 00 `" E Q p > = o 7 o c o c o c 00 v M a .� I+ o '.o a c '+� a u m a o 7 c v o_ O_ U C > V ¢ w w Q w bn J uo o a ¢ w c Y c c c - _ _ . L E ac o a y o 0 o Y u c u u a u E $ o E E 7 a ca E o0 0 7a m ° 0 00 co ro to a C m ra '6 '6 >. O +-' v1 O O C > v -Q O 7 U N ¢ a) c T 7 7 +� u �^ u u .� a c c O1 CO a .0 ec0 0 a Y c > 7 a .N ° a a v a �° E E m Q -Q > a E U U U U a s YO Y co O Q ¢ Y = E `: aci d `� j '� v `: >_ 'S' E 0 u o O a io O c O a O o o .� O T a -Q O V '�n V 2� a -Q CJ _ C 7 N O 7 -O -Q a 7 L '~ t6 O C C > C M C Q .-�i bA O M �n bn a V > 3 7 LL '2 O i Q � ci7 Vl Vl C cc tln .x o - o Y J fp 7 fp a fp (p f0 V 7 7 7 CL G O C '� vui C = N O — — bA N .V a.+ N Q al _O N = `� C1A bn w V •' C O 4 -6 f6 C N Cl CL t0 Cl a Cl G cco 2 aui o c s � Y O c O N O O f° ra io 2 c o on CL Q - c uu on w °D N o u U Q V u a u c a V a c = w w Q w Y w no 3 > 0n tin on - o a o Q E o o c o c a o o a c Q c v a c C C a c O o u 7 a E a > v 3 ocn j N `° ;n 7 3 ~ s° > H .� F H O f0 c i a rn -O m -O a -O '6 H QJ L a H V] F 7 O H +�+ 7 ,.O c m L c ai c c C -Q c c E 0 c 7 O O O O v o U d O c O .nn O a O p U OL p O o O O C _ w U ._ U vi U CL V N co LL f0 � a J O CO I= O of K ¢ CL Q- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O bA F in F F F F F F F F F Ep tin F Y J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - lD p a; `~ N N N M c-1 M M N M N to ID ID zt (7 : m 0' c f :...1a.1..... C c-I N M V) to c-I N M I, 00 a) O Ln a M M M m M M a a M M M IT 'T a ti ti ti N ti ti ti N N ti N ti ti N N a c a cm a a a p > +7 C C _� O .0 u a 0 0 o a v i ~ -oo t �, a' 2i a ;� Y Q Q u ? jcL O N N N p E a a a N -O a cL > 'x > > i .N - C °' O LaLro E 7 N m a '- N L O ~ Y o c v o v o t o 7 ° c ° F o t N to N Sao aj U s .a m O 'X O c ° O o co m > E r c F- c F- c > 0 a +° M a c 0 cc � .Q VI o C v V L.L LL 0 ^ w C N m `p O 'c� O 'u O 'u p O Q Q m f0 .� y Q L Q N a+ L L .V z a c o _ c Y c a ,�i, E E E 3 a o u a 3 ro 3 3 ro n 3 3 o O Q cu C N H C C H C C C o c o °' o °' o o O 'o a o a o p a a O O o o LL o Ca C L C L C U Q C N \ N o m m L ++ > C _ _ _ C L a C m C m C C C O O O E 3 3 3 =o - s N M c co o c y a v � Q u u ° - -o o -° .3 Q o o .o `o .c 3 0 `o o c L C +a+ C aa+ C aa+ O a O +L.+ O_ O io C O io a O >, O cTi o C a 14 a C a c a C i a ++ — N a-+ a+ 'r+ c E a E a E a m a T a v a N m v N m c a Y v a c o N E aE' E aE' E aE' - o a a' > 'E E ._ c 3 0 = o - 40 C O O O 7 Y +m+ a 7 — 7 7 7 u a u Q u Q o- = `o a cr E m a E y o cr > cr a o Q oac E E a E a .� o C p a a a s •- o a - a E o 0 v _ _ ._ cc LL u ._ cc ¢ _ ¢ 3 u cc u cc w u sc ' LL 0 T o o T c c a > ao N N no a a E T T o Y c o m Y m Y o t c E c E a a a 0 a m v s , c O i a a L I n m � m np L Ln Y Q Y 'V m cL N O c Y E m E m E U) a w � v txo t' ^ ° `^ ° `^ i+ a N O Y b Ep L 0 i i i £. LL C) LL p LL a c ac ac a ac ac ac a ac ac OG G G C G G G C G G a ho T C) N T N C C � N � o0 ++ o C a C ++ vai O p a Y +Iv m C p .� Q `� cm a a o ,� V1 E u a U O m ''' = Y ._ O o E ` O_ c O pOj > cL C T T U w a O C VO \ o_ ~ a C E > ° � `o s n o o = = L o ° o O a s m a U u u a o = E L) Y c E w N �a 3 ~ 'c 6 m N o E aui N N ° .° Ca w m ° am ° am v u o a v u ncn w o a _ - - a a D V C a a > w > O O C T L a, u s - L .N T C a oo c L _ _ _ a - a L N F ¢ �[ C a a) >, a O a u > a _ cco a °' O oo ` m a aS-+ a aS-+ >. " 7 C E t7i, .0 a L 'C > G `0 3 O o rn m Y C c o L E > w E c v a o a Y E > o v o ff y v c c ° ° c u 0 7 y ca ° c v a o v 'm o an on F c a v t v n N E m > m -o m E Q E N a m N do o a 3 a >- p > tlD m > C > c a E a � E V OC 7 u L 3 o v .E m 5 U o o tCo o a '`-' a Y o 0 2 a 0 _ N ° as > c a N o N o > u > E ° a = > cc 2i E o c .� � a>' o c a c > a -o a c E 7 F - p o w - a L ° > EO O 'o m ? N o 7 O 7 a C ^ > 'u > oA tlq 2E � > Y C c c w Q o > N m ^ c ^ a a > " c a on a; o m a r a o O m a m •- m N .� N Q - oq O C -O a a .0 O a - � `i O m � X Q w y a o O_ L - _ - - - a o a N o C T T N � 3 � i T p T m F .. p a L T i G bQ O 7� 2 a fl_ N N a a a ._ N „ a E a _ Y a s c a E m c Q '- a 7 E + v' 7 i m - u v u •Q 3 c 7 > V c p a ._ > W �, a a s a J ' aj > O C m a — y0 N N a 4 a T v, w C m N •- 7 `� m a a U O N \Vf 0 a 'Q c a m V m N m >, m •X m a m m to a' m u O N c .� U m x ++ > a U Y 3 � U fCa u 7 U u Y U LL V u aN-+ u a p N N p Cil 7 E t 7 7 7 7 7 7 '�n V 7 a v, = U V 7 — _ - a i cc a c a -o -o a) -o a a -o i o v a o •O D_ m +�.+ C i G C �a. a C m C C C m C a C C > m a Q o O a C '> z p c a o a o m o c c o a " m o ° c u c u > u 3 u u m u H u m - vv) E aX' H v U Q o E9 O O O m a a a a a a a a a to to fl_ Q O_ O_ O_ fl_ O_ O_ fl_ a J J J Y T T T Y 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Y Y Y sue+ O Z c-I c-I M c-I r-I M M N M M m •V Q.,. to c N N N Q' C l0 I, oo m N M Ln lD I, co O c-I a a Ln 'n Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln �D tD a cy c-i c-i cy N c-i c-i c-i c-i ,--i c-i cy N a C V u co aS a5 T — ca � Y >• >• y J 4 = m cub Y Y C C ca Q L O ~ a) a) cL c� Q a� Q -6 7 `� a) E H H E -O O O" -6 -O O cOo -a'6 >a) u a) rTo > D > 3 a)-o m E C C a N a) C Y y p U m O 4 2 o Ou a) a) t cLT U > > O r m Y m O cr E ~ rn rn �n O E p p M v p a3 o E o E o N ++ N O 7 LL a5 mcr L+ sL+ aL+a o o T 7 a) E vl a3 vl a7 .� o_ c o_ c s 0 ° E a) a a r o o o a) o o um o oo o v 0 0 0 o _ a a) a v C C C co C T T C C cL C > N a) E a)cL E E -6 -6 -6 Y _j -6 a 7 '6 d w 1-- cL s-- O' VO O O O O a) �n O O -° O �j >- N o N o N O -6 O -6 o aL+ O N O C o as > > ° u u o m u T 3 X a a) a v p v 1 v � v v " v m m aE) c v Y o a0i o p o p — _ w w E E ° — a — > o — o '— — '— v� L s V 6' O +..� s T L s N N 'o s ns s ns s c ._ ._ v a) •— a) •— a) o m a) u a) > —ra a) = '00 H H H H Q Dc cc nf U a cc o cc .E v of u sc ' LL : 0 C T DD T E 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 4¢D C j, C C O O O L C -p C C Q y: (� m tL tL i L L L i i ,y .. O H H H J — ° s N 'a+ 6 N •y € ti E E E E E E E E E E E Nmm W bD OD tlo GD Co OD bD Qj > T > �cc C C C C C C C C C G Y W Y W G J J J° J J J J J a DD C O Un a) i vi u a) •> f6 N fl_ Q 7 D] N C U al C to 7 N °" Q 7 N N E a 6 a� m o a 3 �_ o .� s ° aaii c a o f6 C [6 ate+ L '� 'N ci -o E 7 L1J ° > C C — to a) N > Y a) C a) 'r O c 7 N ns ° O cL = p O ra tlD — .2 Q N U u V o Y o m F. C - y -a o p E 7 m T c `o n a o o 'n 3 L ca n L T o o v , E -o c c o°Ln ° ° o +� = E o v 0 3 o ti � o L m a0+ u O O O O Q +7+ o yO L N N T L L C N a) °- -O -6 E >, a) in Q LL L N N j, C •_ 's+ J — m w Vl D- -6 ° C _ a) ° ° Q E C ° Y w as 7 — o `� N L ° -6 v u ° ° .N 3- c o o 1B - m v, iu E > a) 3 u c Y o _ a o c o > = , a) E . L u a) u E o a) a v C C a Y Q C v L a a m bA O ° 6 'p ° a1 N O u Q C E cL O- C Y C O- - 4 L — a) N O_ > i E O C a Y Y — ° ° Q — m E m Y - ° v Q u a) E uD v L .� aa, 7 E o n n3 '3 c C N Lj w >• ti OA '� C Q a3 ''—_' a u' a) vl a) '6 }'' 6 Y a) 7 aj a) > ° a) > a) O ._ O +' '— •— E a) O ++ L a) 3 a0+ C N U O a) a) o a) �n 6 0 _ o 0 3 E s _ � . z ° o on L L Y Y o Y o c E m o 7 o 0 0 v - m o E ns L o 0 0 E v o ° 6 3 N L C vt J al O •> N p E O m N ° l) N a>+ 7 C CJ O N O O o u C T O_ > a1 OD a) N t6 ° fa N C C — ca 6_ C 6_ V a i .? 0 4 o ax) u a > Q O ° _ oc T O v v o w ° -o v n a T ° � ° v o O y0 N j p N N — to T tta (° -6 C c u O — E Y O N OA ci — f9 7� _ a) �, a) C aD " � +' a) a) — O coo 3 O a) O L '� >, fD M V >, O_ C t' 4 '^ p -° > ip > U " EL -6 C C j LbA •C -6 C -° '� C 4 'E w V �, vl -6 vl C O -6 E O O 'y v >. >, a-+ C V 7 a) N ? 7 fL0 a1 (i > w -6 cc° C 6 Q 3 7 7 N 7 >, Y Y U ll VI in E L C O O C G OC 7 N bA Vf aL.+ vt C (6 _ C — n r m o a o a O1 a5 fa fa +L.+ E N Q to T as O- a5 V ?� O C m C �n -6 m T � a) m 7 O O O U u 7 a) O a) — u a) O_ .D' B, u L Q O u ° a) u a� c) u a) a) V 7 ° W 7 L 3: 7 > 3 7 Y o f0 7 N ° V 7 �. 0 7 4 v�i u 7 v > U a0+ v UJ E U �n .� '6 '6 -6 > Q > 'O CD a) 7 '6 to N O- N N a fo N E -6 i U Q E 0 C vt m C a) C T T m C C > sL+ m C L �n N a) O L C C '— fl_ a7 C al -o C 3 L O a) 7 a) C a) M U L N U C 7 e C z aL-+ V J p 3 W U .0 Q aL-+ V � J U m a+ ° a) C U -a Lfl H H Ln H V C o Y .� Y t0 Y — V .� ._ — a) a, a v a) v a a) a) a) a) a) a, O_ O_ EL O_ al 6_ O_ fl_ O_ 6_ 6_ a a n D M V7 m a) M M M M M Lr) M M M N M ;Q ar: ryj Q Gal...... C N M vl N GD I, OD Ql C) c-I M a) GD lD lD lD I, lD �o tD ID n n n n a cy c-I c-I c-I r-I c-I c-I rl c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I aJ o a � -0 O ° a a O- C Vf M [) E •� L a n T v N Q — V a C T O >a C O t >• �n fl_ > 7 fl_ � 7 o H a O O i W ti V O p O a a+ m v p O O a ON L O' O N +>+ O a L U N 'O Y U > ~ X 000 ~ oo 2 N > ~ o_ Q Ne u c aE z � La o -a Y 00 _ c 9 y Y Y Y ° c cn C ° > ° a 3 $ 3 3 3 .S p •° LL 0- �° bD O a O O O ,u io m a io c c o > 0 0 0 a Q m £ io + c io is ip a v p a O a � Y c N c O c E U o E 0 0 m 0 v E m °o aTi w m w a O aj O �+ O O `— m Y Y > ai _ p F a1 Y O u O O O a > C U U U cr � u '^ � aw O_ v a a E ° E a ° o �_ aun m 0- > _ ° s s s m O O v v w Q 0C Y OD a a a O O m d' CC OC of on LL LL d LL m m to l0 O LL O N co m Q �t -zt Y........ V1 C C c T vm T W >. m C on a+ � m on E + O a O O 0) ODnp La m m U a+ O m, �i O U N E....U. rho O H O H J - ° s N O o Y ? m a m E m E m E m E m E O - a 2 a E a 2 a 2 a C V T T T T T U) w I E E E E E ui o n o o o o LA +: p a Q a p a p a p a Q W np op to 00 o Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 C C C C C - 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 LL 0 W O a s a v a s O C N 7 O C vi a '6 C i p0 0 C a O m m — C p a m > N C C 'N m a O = L a_ Y > a O O m O >, CL W O o T -0 - m ° 'm X n 3 — > U Y Q O O V u o n > a u - a ° v Q 00 Ln m v, w Y m 'C 3 !n M F C L L Y p W O U .m — -O o O O 0 2 - — p0 op a m a) -0 m L y a > L E u m a °°° n a O> m 0 N = a E '� c m - v u 0 E '- E - 3 ' U1 7 O C y 0- T O m L p a p m O N ? �n D E a ° to � Y a in ; op u a fL m > cm Q bD a 0 v pp m .0 a v Q C c c = m w 3 0 0 N o Y o .� ._ o C o a p C lD — m 7 o O 'a6 tl00 pap a C O ao ° _ O Ln E M 0 '6 C ._ vi ° fp `� �n -p Y C mM +-' a d _C Q O U O C oA ++ U N m O O T N t m m a O m a �O L w Fa p 7 a: u ° E a O n o a .� O v 0 T m _ }° 0 °p 'v E v pp am Q _6 a U of LL w 00 a LL O O U V a > a O E pn '^ •�n in p > Y C Cp •}, o , 'L C to O_ m fl_ m T >. p Q 0- E O m p a w aS 0 o -n .o -o 3 .E a '� a w a u L pp E m 0 s +� 0 0 �, > m E a vi o O •U a o a m o 0 m u m ° 3 ° E to pp LL a 0 pp w > n a a 7 aL O O a E C V T fl_ Q bA ° O T T 2 T_ a p }° o a t a m E p ° pn o ;° — m 0 0 V v u u E c v O Y u Ln a a u in u u o u .� .�, v E .v_, w F a a u LL m a Q a v c 'v 0o cm F a F F pn ao o m y o m o m z a 0 a O 0 4 -0 0 O v L i o f > T > cc E o 0 s O 0_ o p m c p a o E E c 0 W Vt Q W Q G 'a.+ U V ++ ++ V m Vt LL ._ LL U m LL i--I oC LL — W W W E a a a a a a a a a a a >, O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ Q O_ O_ O_ O_ a N m fV c-I Q •a. N c-I c-I N c-I nj N lD N c-I u - l Ln �D r, 00 m o N m o N M a 1l n n r n Ln Ln Ln 00 00 W a