Item Q08 �S Q.S7
I`�
County of Monroe
�y,4 ' �, "tr, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County �a� Mayor Michelle Coldiron,District 2
�1 nff `ll Mayor Pro Tem David Rice,District 4
-Ile Florida.Keys Craig Cates,District 1
Eddie Martinez,District 3
w � Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
County Commission Meeting
November 17, 2021
Agenda Item Number: Q.8
Agenda Item Summary #9891
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Sustainability
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Rhonda Haag (305)453-8774
11:00 A.M.
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Presentation and discussion of the next steps of the $2.772 Billion
Plan developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for reducing coastal storm risk
vulnerability for the Florida Keys.
ITEM BACKGROUND: On September 24, 2021 Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon of the
Department of the Army signed the Chief of Engineers Report for the Florida Keys Coastal Storm
Risk Management Project, formally authorizing the Project. (Attachment included). The report was
subsequently submitted to Congress. The Chief of Engineer's Report serves as the basis for the
authorization of the Recommended Plan by Congress. If the Recommended Plan is authorized and
funds are appropriated, the federal government would finance 65% of the total project cost. The
County and the municipalities would be responsible for 35%, which could come from residential,
local and State funds.
Preconstruction, engineering, and design ("PED") activities are the next step in the process and will
be the focus of the presentation and discussion. The County submitted a preliminary assessment of
priorities in a letter dated January 22, 2021. (Attachment included). When Congress appropriates
funding for implementation, a Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) will be executed between the
County and USACE. The PPA is the cost share agreement that defines the responsibilities of the
non-federal sponsor and federal government for project implementation. Numerous PPA's are
anticipated as funding from Congress is anticipated to be piecemeal over the course of several years.
Monroe County is the non-federal cost-sharing sponsor for all features. The Plan includes measures
located in each of the five municipalities, and Interlocal Agreements will be required to formalize
their participation under the County's PPA's with the USACE.
Total Project Cost(65/35 cost share): $2,772,359,000
■ 65% federal funding of project= $1,802,033,000
■ 35%non-federal funding of project= $970,326,000
The presentation previously provided to the BOCC is included as an Attachment to this item, and
specifies the number, types and costs of the structural and nonstructural measures. This item is to
Packet Pg. 1463
Q.8
discuss the next steps that are anticipated to occur.
NEXT STEPS:
I t
l t a
September 2021 Chief of Engineer's Report and study complete
Beyond 2021 Congressional authorization for construction
Potential project appropriations
Agreements with non-federal entities necessary for construction
Interlocal Agreements with the municipalities for participation.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
09/19/18: Approval to enter into a Study Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
initiate a study partnership to investigate storm and sea level rise vulnerability for the U.S. 1 corridor
in Monroe County, funded up to $3 Million by the USACE; also, ratification of the Letter of Intent
submitted by the County Administrator; request for Chief Financial Officer to sign the Self-
Certification of Financial Capability; and authority for the County Attorney and the Mayor to sign
related documents.
05/22/19: Presentation update on the partnership agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
for investigating storm and sea level rise vulnerability for the Florida Keys to provide the
recommended list of alternatives for moving forward.
02/06/20: Presentation under the partnership agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) for investigating coastal storm risk vulnerability for the Florida Keys, to present and
discuss the list of alternatives under the details of the recommendation for the Tentatively Selected
Plan for Monroe County as developed by the USACE.
05/20/20: Approval of preferred alternative and its options for the Tentatively Selected Plan
developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under the partnership agreement with
USACE for investigating coastal storm risk vulnerability for the Florida Keys.
06/17/20: Discussion and direction of the preferred alternative and its options, including input from
the municipalities, for the Tentatively Selected Plan developed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) under the partnership agreement with USACE for investigating coastal storm
risk vulnerability for the Florida Keys.
10/21/20: Discussion and presentation of the newly revised $5.5 Billion preferred alternative
developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the option for the County to select a
Locally Preferred Plan under the partnership agreement with USACE for investigating coastal storm
Packet Pg. 1464
Q.8
risk vulnerability for the Florida Keys.
02/17/21: Discussion and direction of the final revised $2.6 Billion preferred alternative developed
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for reducing coastal storm risk vulnerability for the
Florida Keys; and approval of the Letter of Support and Financial Certification that are required in
order to complete the feasibility study, authorizing Ms. Boan to sign the Financial Certification and
Mr. Gastesi to sign the Letter of Support.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval to move forward to next steps.
DOCUMENTATION:
Monroe's Letter for Priorities 01-22-21
TAB 01 - SIGNED Chief s Report Florida Keys CSRM_20210924
USACE Briefing MAY 2021
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date of USACE/County Study: September 19, 2018
Expiration Date: Three years after the effective date
Total Dollar Value of USACE Study Contract: $0
Total Cost to County: $0
Current Year Portion: $0
Budgeted: No
Source of Funds: N/A
CPI: N/A
Indirect Costs: N/A
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: $161,000 O&M annually
Revenue Producing: No If yes, amount:
Grant: Yes
County Match: 35% in future
Insurance Required: No
Additional Details: The County is responsible for 35% of the $2,772,359,000 in project costs,
which will be shared by other sources and the municipalities.
REVIEWED BY:
Rhonda Haag Completed 11/01/2021 11:47 AM
Cynthia Hall Completed 11/01/2021 4:23 PM
Purchasing Completed 11/01/2021 4:46 PM
Budget and Finance Completed 11/02/2021 11:11 AM
Maria Slavik Completed 11/02/2021 11:46 AM
Packet Pg. 1465
Q.8
Liz Yongue Completed 11/02/2021 12:13 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 11/17/2021 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 1466
Q.8.a
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
IL'ounty of Monroef r`` r Mayor Michelle Coldiron,District 2
The Florida Keys Mayor Pro Fern David Rice,District 4
y4 .�y ,�
Craig Cates,District 1
Eddie Martinez,District 3
Mike Forster,District 5
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Office of the County Administrator
The Historic Gato Cigar Factory
1100 Simonton Street, Suite 205 a
Key West, FL 33040
(305)292-4441 —Phone
(305)292-4544 —Fax
January 22, 2020
a.
Ashton Burgin
Project Manager
USACE Norfolk District v)
RE: Florida Keys Coastal Risk Management Study Element Sequencing
Dear Ms. Burgin: O
Thank you for the briefing on Thursday,January 14,2021 regarding the status of the Florida Keys Coastal
Storm Risk Management Study (FKCSRMS or "project"). We appreciate the opportunity to discuss the
proj ect's next steps. As reported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(USACE), a signed Chief s Report
for the FKCSRMS is anticipated in September of 2021. This correspondence responds to the request from
the Jacksonville District as they draft a budget package for design of the first FKCSRMS elements to be
constructed(FY 23).
Currently,the USACE is seeking input from Monroe County (as the Non-Federal Sponsor)regarding they
initial preference, or sequencing, of the project's elements for funding and implementation. The goal of 2-
this discussion is to align priorities for upcoming authorization and budget cycles for both the County and
USACE under a 35/65% cost share. The scope of this request for sequencing includes funds for design
(not construction) of these elements. The elements of the project include:
• 6 Revetments along the shoreline of US Highway 1 2
• Residential home elevations 0
• Commercial property floodproofing
• Critical infrastructure floodproofing a
At this time,please note the County's preference for sequencing is the following:
1. Design of the six revetments along US 1. Given that US 1 is the County's only hurricane
evacuation route, the opportunity to improve the resiliency of the road leads in importance. Per
information from the USACE,the revetments are estimated at $16 Million in construction costs with$1.6
Million in engineering design costs. We understand that only engineering fees would be requested for this
request. The federal cost share for the engineering is $1,040,000 in federal funds (65%) and $560,000 as
the local cost share (35%). Monroe County intends to reach out to FDOT to participate in this cost share.
Packet Pg. 1467
Q.8.a
2.Design of the critical infrastructure floodproofing projects (48 at this time). The priority of these
projects should be based on the most vulnerable structures first, or potentially County-owned structures.
Per information from the USACE, the critical infrastructure floodproofing of all 48 structures has a
construction cost estimated at$10.8 Million with $1,080,000 in engineering design costs. The cost share
for the engineering is $702,000 in federal funds (65%) and $378,000 in local cost share (35%).
The County is conducting its own sea level rise vulnerability assessment update (to be completed by July
2021) and we believe that we will have more information to offer the Corps for consideration of which
critical infrastructure projects should be undertaken first. This will be one more analysis that can help U)
better prioritize which of the 48 critical infrastructure projects planned in the project overall should be _
sequenced first. We understand that we do not need that level of granularity for individual structure
priorities at this point,but we wanted to inform the Corps of forthcoming analysis that may be helpful for
additional project planning. a
We continue to remain supportive of our partnership with USACE and thank you for the opportunity to
provide this response to you. For any further information on this correspondence, please do not hesitate
to reach out to Rhonda Haag, our Chief Resilience Officer.
CL
Thank you,
Roman Gastesi
County Administrator
N
N
N
CL
2-
0
C
0
Packet Pg. 1468
Q.8.b
° ., DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
2600 ARMY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON,O.C. 20310-2600
0
DAEN �
SEP 2 4 2421
SUBJECT: Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida Coastal Storm Risk Management
6
THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
1. 1 submit for transmission to Congress my report on coastal storm risk management CL
for the Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida. It is accompanied by the report of the
Norfolk District Commander. This report is an interim response to the study authority
contained in Public Law 84-71, dated 15 June 1955, which authorizes an examination
and survey of the coastal and tidal areas of the eastern and southern United States,
with particular reference to areas where severe damages have occurred from
hurricanes. Preconstruction, engineering, and design (PED) activities, if funded, would
be continued under the authority cited above.
LU
2. The National Economic Development (NED) plan resulting from this study includes
the following elements: --
N
a. Dry floodproofing 53 critical infrastructure buildings that were identified at risk to
damage from coastal storms. Dry floodproofing will reduce the damage caused by storm
surge during coastal storm events so that emergency and critical services can resume
more quickly after a coastal storm event.
b. Nonstructural measures to reduce coastal storm damage to 4,698 residential and
1,052 nonresidential structures at risk throughout the Florida Keys. The nonstructural
measures in the recommended plan include elevation of residential structures and dry
floodproofing of nonresidential structures.
r_
3. In addition, stabilization of U.S. Route 1 (Overseas Highway) is critical to allowing
evacuation and re-entry to and from the Florida Keys before and after major storm
events. Maintaining this access would minimize risks to life safety and would reduce
delays to post-storm recovery while increasing total project costs by less than one
percent. In July 2021, the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) approved
a request to include the stabilization of U.S. Route 1 as part of the recommended
project. Shoreline stabilization would be constructed at six locations along U.S. Route 1
that were identified as having risk of damage due to erosion and/or wave energy during
a coastal storm event. These six rock revetment structures range in height from +4 feet
North Atlantic Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) to +10 feet NAVD88 and were
designed to reduce damage to a total of approximately 5,500 feet of roadway by
stabilizing the shoreline and reducing the risk of washout.
Packet Pg. 1469
Q.8.b
DAEN
SUBJECT: Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida Coastal Storm Risk Management
4. Monroe County, Florida is the non-federal cost-sharing sponsor for all features. 0
Project costs for the recommended project are based on October 2020 (fiscal year
2021) price levels.
a. Project First Cost. The estimated first cost of the recommended project is
$2,103,462,000. This estimate includes $1,451,001,000 for construction; $50,305,000
for lands, easements, rights-of-ways, relocations, and dredged or excavated material
disposal areas (LERRDs) including federal administrative costs; $230,781,000 for PED;
and $230,781,000 for construction management.
b. Estimated Federal and Non-Federal Share. In accordance with the cost sharing
provisions of Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986,
as amended (33 U.S. Code 2213), the federal share of the project first cost is estimated
to be $1,367,250,000 and the non-federal share is estimated to be $736,212,000, which
equates to 65 percent federal and 35 percent non-federal. The non-federal costs include
the value of LERRDs. _
c. The non-federal sponsor is responsible for the annual operation, maintenance,
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation (OMRR&R) of the project after construction,
estimated at$161,000 per year.
5. Based on a 2.50 percent discount rate and a 50-year period of analysis, the total
CD
equivalent average annual costs of the project are estimated to be $85,557,000. All
project costs are allocated to the authorized purpose of coastal storm risk management.
The equivalent average annual benefits are estimated to be $131,603,000 with net
average annual benefits of$46,046,000. The benefit to cost ratio is approximately
1.5 to 1. The project will reduce coastal storm damage to critical infrastructure,
residential and coastal structures, and U.S. Route 1, the singular evacuation route and
connection to mainland Florida.
6. Risk and uncertainty factored into the economic analysis through the use of
statistical risk-based models. The Generation 11 Coastal Risk Model (G2CRM) was used
to evaluate the suite of alternatives within the study area. G2CRM is a desktop
computer model that implements an object-oriented probabilistic life cycle analysis
using event-driven Monte Carlo simulation, asset (structure) inventory, and damage
relationship functions to compute equivalent annual damage (with and without project). LU
This allows for incorporation of time-dependent and stochastic event-dependent _
behaviors such as sea level change, tide, and structure raising and removal. The project ,
is intended to address structure damage caused by storm surge inundation and manage
coastal storm risk.
7. In accordance with Engineering Regulation 1100-2-8162, Incorporating Sea Level
Change in Civil Works Programs, the study's analysis evaluated the effects of different E
rates of sea level change in the with- and without-project conditions. Analysis showed
2
Packet Pg. 1470
Q.8.b
DAEN
SUBJECT: Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida Coastal Storm Risk Management
that the historic sea level rise recorded for the study area tracks with our U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) high rate of sea level change and the most likely future
scenario would be consistent with the high rate of sea level change. Therefore, the
recommended project was formulated and evaluated using the high rate of sea level -
change. To address uncertainty, project performance was also assessed at the low and
intermediate rates of sea level change.
8. In accordance with USACE policy on review of decision documents, all technical,
engineering, and scientific work underwent an open, dynamic, and rigorous review
process to ensure technical quality. This included district quality control, agency
technical review, independent external peer review, and a headquarters policy and legal
review. All comments from these reviews have been addressed and incorporated into
the final documents.
9. Washington level review indicates that the project recommended by the reporting
officers complies with all essential elements of the 1983 U.S. Water Resources _
Council's Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Land
Related Resources Implementation studies and complies with other administrative and
legislative policies and guidelines. Also, the views of interested parties, including
federal, state, and local agencies have been considered.
10. 1 concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the reporting
officers. Accordingly, I recommend that the plan to manage coastal storm risk to the N�
Florida Keys be authorized in accordance with the report officers' recommended plan at
an estimated project first cost of$2,103,462,000 with such modifications as in the
discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable. My recommendation is subject to
cost sharing, financing, and other applicable requirements of federal and state laws and
policies, including Section 103 of WRDA 1986, as amended. The non-federal sponsor
would provide the non-federal share of project costs and all LERRDs. Further, the non-
federal sponsor would be responsible for all OMRR&R. Federal implementation of the
project for coastal risk management includes, but is not limited to, the following required
items of local cooperation to be undertaken by the non-federal sponsor in accordance
with applicable federal laws, regulations, and policies:
a. Provide 35 percent of construction costs, as further specified below:
LU
i. Provide, during design, 35 percent of design costs in accordance with the
terms of a design agreement entered into prior to commencement of design work for the
project;
ii. Provide all real property interests, including placement area improvements,
and perform all relocations determined by the Federal Government to be required for
the project; and
3
Packet Pg. 1471
Q.8.b
DAEN
SUBJECT: Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida Coastal Storm Risk Management
iii. Provide, during construction, any additional contribution necessary to make
its total contribution equal to at least 35 percent of construction costs.
b. Prevent obstructions or encroachments on the project (including prescribing and
enforcing regulations to prevent such obstructions or encroachments) that might reduce
the level of coastal storm risk reduction the project affords, hinder operation and
maintenance of the project, or interfere with the project's proper function;
c. Inform affected interests, at least yearly, of the extent of risk reduction afforded
by the project; participate in and comply with applicable federal floodplain management
and flood insurance programs; prepare a floodplain management plan for the project to
be implemented not later than one year after completion of construction of the project;
and publicize floodplain information in the area concerned and provide this information
to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their use in adopting regulations, or taking
other actions, to prevent unwise future development and to ensure compatibility with the
project; _
LU
d. Operate, maintain, repair, rehabilitate, and replace the project or functional
portion thereof at no cost to the Federal Government, in a manner compatible with the .�
project's authorized purposes and in accordance with applicable federal laws and
regulations and any specific directions prescribed by the Federal Government;
N
e. Give the Federal Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a
reasonable manner, upon property that the non-federal sponsor owns or controls for
access to the project to inspect the project, and, if necessary, to undertake work
necessary to the proper functioning of the project for its authorized purpose;
f. Hold and save the Federal Government free from all damages arising from
design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of
the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Federal
Government or its contractors;
g. Perform, or ensure performance of, any investigations for hazardous, toxic, and
radioactive wastes (HTRW) that are determined necessary to identify the existence and
extent of any HTRW regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675, and any other
applicable law, that may exist in, on, or under real property interests that the Federal _
Government determines to be necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of ,
the project; T_
h. Agree, as between the Federal Government and the non-federal sponsor, to be
solely responsible for the performance and costs of cleanup and response of any
HTRW regulated under applicable law that are located in, on, or under real property
interests required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, including
4
Packet Pg. 1472
Q.8.b
DAEN
SUBJECT: Florida Keys, Monroe County, Florida Coastal Storm Risk Management
0
the costs of any studies and investigations necessary to determine an appropriate
response to the contamination, without reimbursement or credit by the Federal
Government; y
0
i. Agree, as between the Federal Government and the non-federal sponsor, that
the non-federal sponsor shall be considered the owner and operator of the project for
the purpose of CERCLA liability or other applicable law, and to the maximum extent
practicable shall carry out its responsibilities in a manner that will not cause HTRW
liability to arise under applicable law; and
j. Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended,
(42 U.S.C. 4630 and 4655) and the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 C.F.R Part 24,
in acquiring real property interests necessary for construction, operation, and
maintenance of the project including those necessary for relocations, and placement
area improvements; and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and o
procedures in connection with said Act.
11. The recommendations contained herein reflect the information available at this time
and current departmental policies governing formulation of individual projects. These W
recommendations do not reflect program and budgeting priorities inherent in the
formulation of the national civil works program nor the perspective of higher review N
levels within the Executive Branch. Consequently, the recommendations may be N,
modified before they are transmitted to the Congress as proposals for authorization and
implementation funding. However, prior to transmittal to the Congress, the non-federal
sponsor, the state, interested federal agencies, and other parties will be advised of any
modifications and will be afforded an opportunity to comment further. o
0
0
SCOTT A. SPELL ON
Lieutenant General, USA
Chief of Engineers
0
5
Packet Pg. 1473
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :ivawyaeuv V
ui >=
Cl) LU
—< -0 4—
CD 0
Z0
CN
fJ �
a;
w;
!0 r
a
i
s
Ilre
, -
� � ,_
7�
1
1,
i
A {i45,
E.S
i ,
E3
t�W ,
�0z
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :ivawyaeuv rn
fJ �
a
O
m
a'
O co
cc
L •—
O
Co i O
�O V
O O
O coi •—
'� co
DC DC O can O .
T
i q SSA,
® t �
`gat
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :;uawyaellyco co_
u �
0
fJ U
wt/ a
cc
I
L
o (n co
co .— o
L co
._ O co
0 -^ Co
co
c
co o
cc
�I
�
0 V 0 V r
.� co
O 7C)
Cc LL Co
C J
Co
H �
tf
p I
kNt
t rf
NNUU I
�I1 III
i
33
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116, V i
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui! �`;
iillllh0000000000000000iiiiillllh0000000000000000iiiiilllh00000000000000000i��
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :ivawyaeuv r�
fJ �
a;
` O
N
fa fa
N N
N
E E CD O N
N E
U o N CDCDto CD O 0 E
O -W — = +.+
fa r-I m CD o to
m •� M •N V
V im { 7 V 70 0O i fa
_ N
E CD CD
_
N i
fa � to
O CD CD� M •V N
O 4-0
N •� N O •O
V
M N Li CDr_
H � •� H � H Li � H � Q � W
yE '
att�
�"°°iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
6iilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll'' � � ''; ' � E
r �
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :;uawyaejjy co_
n'
CR d
m
Ali
Its �
I
i
3
1
c w
N N
CL
13
Q
tit A t
t}(
,�,.� �11'l �• dco
ci
}
rt' d o d
co0
_ N
Cq
Lo
SS
y
m Q
LL
}1i
06
Q 0 z �
z �
o. z a
t� ° � 00
u � o. CO)
Rf sAli
co
tU
M4. LL
}} fS4
sdal4o`a;epdn ueld Apn;g Al!llglseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ul}ali -Aodsn :;uawyaeuv c+>,
� � a
O � d
Y
• c O G.
ate-+ p •t_n aN-+ O Cl C)
a= i N cl (fl
E � cr L!) M
Clr-i
> Q m � � � M Cl M
O m o
N f Q v Lo
II �
O L� O •v to t/) +-+ II •� _
Ca `�•� _� cc
E O Q O
N ( ) 4-1 tB E •� U O O �
O co o ._ _ 4-1 � CD
0 m
C13
Cc (fin mate-+ = 0 aj
CU
L p _ O O Q
cc a--+ Q tB
W cc
_ i
C) w O M y o "
N ia)
(n N c o r-I
r1 to a--+ O
to W ti Lf) Q to
t/� O -us ■ ■ ■ O Ca (.0 COCa
Q O
ca Z i� L.Lcc
1 N p U
{f} H m
! E
t�
II �.
I�
I � j
� I 4
I i tE
4 �
I
I�
I I
4l ITV
f
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :;uawyaelly o
Qo
to
O N V
N O
N �
in
N N •�
p O N CO N V '� N •—
N '— v O •v r-I N LO
cn
E CD
Lo A
� � N N i O O P `� • •
CD LJJ N • L% C� t� •�
N N
,.tsq
r`
4 b
q
'YI
I
r
kt
�---..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-
s18140`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligisea_A:;ovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -qodsn :;uawyaeuv
co
u N
N w 00
CJ M � N N 00
N A
N Ln a
I
- a
N LA CAN LA
n 00 m N M 00 C3
4
00 N m 00
k M N M � N
I °
i
i
ti4
s}aiuo'alepdn uel-d-h,�h,�Apnjs Al!l!gisea_A-Aodsn? �zoz.ldw sui}alis -qodsn :;uawgoeuv N
co
ai M M O O
M
t i 00 w r"
N ^ N M 0.
N 0bn
0 Ool� O m .+
4 N Q1 0000 Ln i j• Y
r-I ri O O M > O @
L/> ri N Ah. ri .h. N fD CIA a
� � C:' cB
LIN N M p '0 :3
C11 M (n N 4* N O N to
00 � C11 LA r-I Ln Ln
N
ri Ln M 00 N r-I
�in. M4- �� 4-
U
Ln O 00 Q 4� i
Ln
M I% M r-I F, p N tin
M Cl LA n OQ 4- C
LD fD
LD N N n M O O E C=
Ln 00
N 4* M 00 00 M O Q N t
4^ ri 4^ 4 ri 4 RT N
4^
O N Ln n p
N 00 N N Ln Ln
N LD ^ M 00 (n O N :3
M M Ln Ln o M Ln U
O 00 n
00 M M CI t :3
N (n TO M C: Ln
in i/f i/f i/f O N
�Ln C2
4�
Ln
U O
N U
" t
in
� ft
® rE� �A
t�
1
1
1
I
-J" %%
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!l!q!sea_A-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw Bulbar -qodsn :ivau�yae;4d ace
cc
cc
X
N
N V 0 !
m to 70cc
p O
O O ++
O = 'CAA n 0 p a p O C
^ 4.0
O ++ N N to
t� a N p = 0
a 0 > N to N !CA +r
N N .O E W -0 N
O N p
0 U •0 N ++ N _ N O
a) U E p C r- c6 +r
CO N -0 •� ++ to
to N \ ++ ++ .O N
O 0) C� N >, 0) o N V N = N ++
-0N bA 0) LO O •a 0) N
cn t6 _� C •�_ N - V A a O = NLLJ
N
4--
CO CO
�
Na v 0) v Q a� a CV) -5
O O �-• N = N
2 H N .- L 4-- to
dab
TO
gab
z
�r
14
l
� uuuuuulol F„
i
}
P, k
IIIIIIIyIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Illlllll� �'
aa�pia
Illi{I!II i �'
I l '
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld -Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs)) 6zoz kvw Bulbous -Aodsn :;uawL40ejjy V
u b
ai r
fJ �'
a
Il c %
LL W d
4- U U =3 C) a)
41on
t1A a0., O > O O > U c +j +j
>' >� N U 41 _N
U +' U _ ate-+ 41 Q c E Q
tB N aA O E
U tB Q :EE 0 E Q N N c U O
a0.+ 4- N L N W c U
W O — N O a) Ln O c Q O
U tB L.L V) N LL N N S O c -J O
N 4- i ,
_ V) p� ca W 41 W O w � U 'N N �LU U
Ll 4 CO 4-J tB 4- N N U c t�l1
+� � N 41 N
t1A cc aA O 0 O c W 0 O
ca _N N T E v Q N U
a) c � C 41 N N O O &- 41 d —
— L.L W v) — oC — s U U U a -0 a LZ Q
rH
rl r-i N
O
CL O O N N
r Q N N N
O
i � Q � n M � Ln Ln
- N � 4-J 0. pt: N N N M
Lid O m m cn � O O O O
k f
1
Y
s
fl
8�.
IlluliliNlll I �,� �� I,i I IIIIII
iliVVlihliliilililililililililililililili(i(illlililililililililililililililililili(i(i(ilililill(i(il �� I
s}aiyo`a;epdn ueld Apn;g Al!ligiseaj-Aovs l) 6zoz kvw 6ulbali -Aodsn :;uawyaejjy Lo
u co
eo
ss
Y
�5
h:.
"
I i
n �
SiSi�a p. }q
�. 4 ili�
i
III it
t r 6
I
l I
I I 4�1 a
a + �
r �,�
L
ui
ui
z C
MJ < 1. 0) .5
L
I4-1 04 >h Cl
r.•
Oct >'
L
CD L-
L
54.
ix
tr.
Eo 'l
QW 0 , g
M O z �� �
O
� Q �
V C
cu
CL tb W
V � O
•O � V
� � V
� � O
Q cu
+�
+•+ U +�.+
O w CL
a �
z
r;
f
a.
i
i
LA(14 en O Ln O
N Co Cz C t0 C) N
k TA TA O O to
R* N O 00 N i
00 Ln C11 O N d M bA
rl V--1 TA O cmN N
6 rl M rl rl nj ra a-+
k= N N N N y} ca cB
C U
O N
t0 N O N n 00 O
QI N f6
OI cmN N c6 4I
r4 w M N M O N E
e-1 N
-- M 00 i--I i —
{�/} Lr y ts lDVIP Z3
� U
Ln 00
i
t0 t0 N O TA Ln C v Ln
r-I N O fu 0
N 00 N ^ Ln G O ' E OC
w N N N M ri - t
O Lr � Lf1 N O O 41 [0
co cn
cm 4J
O 00N LEI N p L1
N 00 �
tN0 n eq LnG N a 1
N w ^ M 00 C1 N ;, N U
LA LA O
co enM O 00 � }' 41
O Lf� 00 d1 N N C N
O O O M O i
N NCL
41
s O Ln
_ O
41
s
1t
�tl III � e
t
lit
�
ct
M
� U �
v'
U U U Q ct cn O
CA
En
cn
ct
OOO
C" CIAU •� •OM U U O _� N
•�
ct
c�
O � �
w U C U U �
�5
f
.° ° .CIA
cr CA ct
cn
cn
cn
N cn U
� � o ,� � ° o Q Q •�, � U
cn 10
ct
cn N -� Q •,
cn cn
ct
CA ct
wl
• •� Q vct bA
u� w -
ct
a a�
O O O °
O c� 11:1"
gm
441
s
b .
ss�
• �- III � I F� �
RR y3g }}
i
�I t€
1'
1
m ® O Q.m -_ 5v� Y p U y
'�
O
O � `*�? ® °" � �' p,•� � � •ice. ."~.J' � � p" � �
tp
rn 4a a o N N v 'p
o oF�I to t y o y
44 ° U
o '� �° E
co
u � ��
��ci
.I �
U •a '�
U ZV-� 3 a U U
O � •v � O ,��0 bA sY"' O O
5 •tom cc O R,
S.
Ic
cz
,ILI p O p .�
C7
t9 We 4
P4 � a
2 94
i
W 4 vi "o Apr
op p§�
Jl 4
' A u s
2
64
aNX
�
es ' ` n uE
Ua M b K
{ i
____. C ____.
CL
C
ca N
06 O -0_ O O cB p75
_I_- 4
aJ 4- i C +'
O r Q O ra
.Q N
W O d o\°vi 0 p� (0 CL
OaA O -® cz
c c o a 0
o v
N
a
a�
C U �
N O _ 4- L
tM 4-co Q +� ai Lh
N Q N N
V
U1 f11
5 C O d z 0 Z V)
O t _ LL � I V w N
o Z p Q VI 4.1 V
Q Lf) o to 4- C Q a- Q} [TS
N lD 'Q m O LL�/y)) V O U
c
' L M o_ L U U N
o fil���r�11�}'t j Q
� T
0
NJ i Q! �
Ln
C g ++ .a... 4J �- fB LU 4J
0 U-
aj 4J y� +'
CID
o c ; 1 (D CV O o
o + f0
O d x z a CA '� IV O
kn
L ._ C O Ln o o f6 O
Q aot Uba °� v bO b U O
¢ p p n O cr
0
Q y -0 LL — anai
C,J �
i N Ln
CA 4-1 CC
•N t -0 o Z *� N [6 W U N �1
co
N N M �n \ v v Q u' c/a w O
LL z LL m
O o U
Ln
W O- d 6E
CA
CL
. c o
Q CA
41
¢ LM
p aA as a (U
c
U.
LU
c
tS l}E
1fi6 i
r
f)Pc))E)
�)�4�i titer
� S L
� i t � +O•+ y }N}
N N O O O O rl LL
p 0 N
N y O (.) 0 U
X O i N U N
N p N 0 0 O
++ O •?r U
y O O O +O.► O
O N V O O +N+
N +.+ N
N V N N O H O N -0
(a Or CC (D •'OA Z,
+.+ } E E W �A cn .�
-0 0O V E LL O , Q � N Q
?� O >_ V O O
C uj •O E .O •� D �_ O = Q
O i c.> >, N •� •>j Q
N -0N fu
r (6 .� M O N
0 0 Q O N _
E N
O Ucr
CC M (6 N O •>+ N O O
:3 +' - O O+j .� - N +r
O CC .O N M c
O V •�p d W 0- U � V M d
a � a� •�, >
12)
CL F- .
0 0
<4`
• as
dw
mm
dw
t
4=
a
t
tW
� 0 �
� N
4-J aA cn
U C '
i N L U N
O O N 0- QjN N
N Q C E Q
N a) O E
v� a) ci O
Lu buo U
as c a O
c � o +_� o
_ U U a-
tL0 •� a) i U
c co 3CU }'� 4 '
a) � N U c +�+
O N; a) c v1 X O
� Q UA O LU U O
N '� Q N U
U OU U CL -0 a LE Q
c-i
N
O
(V
a N N
� O
E N
Q
+�-+ i 0 m qt Ln Ln
CL Of N N N M
cn o O o O
r .
it
iy
�i
s :
f
Itt c;
1
i
i
x
x
g a
sS � li
f