Item Q1 Q.1
County f � .�� ��� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mayor David Rice,District 4
Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates,District 1
The Florida Keys '
Y � �F' Michelle Coldiron,District 2
Vacant,District 3
--' Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
County Commission Meeting
February 16, 2022
Agenda Item Number: Q.1
Agenda Item Summary #10015
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: County Attorney's Office
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Shillinger(305) 292-3470
n/a
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: County Attorney Report for February 2022.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Monthly report is attached.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Report.
DOCUMENTATION:
CAY Report Feb 2022
Ebix Report Jan 2022
MASTER FINES AND COSTS SPREADSHEET AS OF JANUARY 2022
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Packet Pg. 2935
Q.1
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing: If yes, amount:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
n/a
REVIEWED BY:
Cynthia Hall Completed 02/01/2022 1:52 PM
Bob Shillinger Completed 02/01/2022 2:36 PM
Liz Yongue Completed 02/01/2022 2:40 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 02/16/2022 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 2936
Q.1.a
7� Monroe
� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Mon oe Mayor David Rice,District 4
h l
it Pro Tem Craig Cates,District 1
The Florida Keys �� t
� , � Michelle Coldiron,District 2
' Vacant,District 3
� Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
Robert B.Shillinger,County Attorney— Office of the County Attorney
Pedro J.Mercado,Senior Assistant County Attorney** 1111 1211,Street,Suite 408
Cynthia L.Hall,Assistant County Attorney** Key West,FL 33040
Christine Limbert-Barrows,Assistant County Attorney** Phone(305)292-3470
Derek V.Howard,Assistant County Attorney** Fax (305)292-3516
Peter H.Morris,Assistant County Attorney*
Patricia Fables,Assistant County Attorney
Paunece Scull,Assistant County Attorney tV
N
Joseph X.DiNovo,Assistant County Attorney* CD
James Molenaar,Assistant County Attorney tV
**Board Certified in City,County&Local Government Law 2
To: Mayor & Commissioners U-
r-
From- Bob Shillinger, County Attorney
Date: February 1, 2022
Re: February 2022 County Attorney Report
E
Cases of Interest at Trial Court Level
1. Monroe County v. Sugarloaf VFD, Inc. & Sugarloaf Wi-Fi, Inc. , CAK 17-631. The
County sued both SVFD and Wi-Fi to invalidate a lease between SVFD and Wi-Fi on 0
the grounds that SVFD had not approved the lease in an open meeting. The trial court
ruled in favor of the County and voided the lease. Wi-Fi appealed and lost. On 1/31/21
the County filed a motion for attorneys' fees to recover attorneys' fees and costs from
SVFD as the prevailing party. Mediation between Wi-Fi, the SVFD, and the County is >
ongoing. On 11/22/2021, the Court entered a judgment for attorneys' fees and costs in W.
favor of the County in the amount of$217,159.86. There will be an item on the 2/16/22
CD
agenda to approve a settlement with SVFD whereby the County will accept the
transfer of Fire Station No. 10 in lieu of moving to collect on the attorneys' fees
and costs.
0
2. Key Haven Assoc. Enterprises, Inc. v. FDEP, DEO and Monroe County, 2d Jud. Cir.
(Leon County) Case No. 21-CA-1613. The Plaintiff filed an action for declaratory relief �-
and inverse condemnation against FDEP and DEO, alleging that denial of fill permits by
the agencies for 5 lots on Key Haven owned by the Plaintiff constituted a taking.
Following motions to dismiss filed by the two Defendants in which DEO argued that
Plaintiff had failed to include the County as an indispensable party because the denials
were based in part on the County's land development regulations, Plaintiff notified the
County that it will be seeking to amend its complaint to add the County as a party.
Awaiting filing and service of the Amended Complaint.
3. KITK, LLC v. Monroe County, CAP 19-351. Property owner filed a Complaint seeking a
judicial declaration that F.S. 419.001(12) preempts Monroe County's land development
regulations from prohibiting, on its allegedly residentially zoned property, its alleged
community residential home of six or fewer residents. On 10/6/20, the County filed its
answer. The plaintiff and the County have engaged in settlement discussions and
anticipate reaching a settlement.
1
Packet Pg. 2937
Q.1.a
4. Sunset Garden Estate Land Trust v. Monroe County, CAP 19-460. Property owner filed
a two-count complaint alleging that various state laws including the Right to Farm Act,
F.S. 823.14, preempt the County's land development regulations from applying to its
parcel and seeking judicial declarations that its alleged agricultural activities are immune
from the County's land development regulations. On 2/27/20, the Plaintiffs filed a
second amended Complaint. The County filed an answer on 6/29/21 .
5. Roy's Trailer Park v. Noel & Monroe County, 19-CA-175-K (lower tribunal: CC-K-18-
112). Declaratory Judgment suit filed by Roy's against County as part of its eviction suit
against its tenant. On 10/4/18, the County countersued the trailer park and the park
residents, seeking an injunction prohibiting occupancy at the park until serious fire and
life safety issues have been addressed, and for appointment of a receiver, and a
declaratory relief cause of action to determine whether the owner or tenants are
responsible for the code violations. On 8/5/21, the County took the deposition of the
park owner's principal, Michael Browning. On 12/7/21, the Court denied the park
owner's motion for summary judgment. Mediation is scheduled for 3/18/22. _
r_
0
6. Maschal et al. v. Monroe County and FKAA, CA K 19-186— Suit against Monroe County
and FKAA by Banks Prevatt and 11 other individuals seeking similar relief to the Delaney
lawsuit, which the County won. On 9/30/21, the Court dismissed the Plaintiffs' Second
Amended Complaint, but also granted the Plaintiffs' motion to file a supplementary
complaint. On 10/11/21, Plaintiffs filed a different supplementary complaint. On
10/12/21, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Disqualify the trial judge; the Court granted the order
on 10/14/21 and the case was reassigned to Judge Jones. On 10/15/21, Plaintiffs filed
a motion to reconsider the 9/30/21 order granting the County's Motion to Dismiss. The
County and FKAA have filed a Motion to Strike the supplementary complaint and Motion
for Reconsideration of the Court's 9/30/21 order granting leave to file the supplementary
complaint. A hearing on these motions was held on 1/4/22, at which time the Court
took all three motions under advisement.
N
7. Burke Construction Group, Inc. v. Monroe County, CA-M 19-80 - On 7/11/19, Burke
Construction Group sued to challenge the County's bid protest procedure and decisions
to award contracts for the Marathon Library and Cudjoe Fire Station projects to other
contractors. On 11/19/21, the Court denied the County's motion to dismiss. The
County issued an Answer. Discovery will now begin.
8. Monroe County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al., No. 4:19-cv-10049. This case was filed
by Monroe County against opioid manufacturers/marketers and distributors on 4/3/19.
The complaint seeks damages including punitive damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and
injunctive relief. The case is part of multi-district litigation under a judge in Cleveland,
Ohio. The parties are in settlement discussions with the distributor defendants and
Johnson & Johnson. Three of the other manufacturer defendants (Purdue Pharma,
Insys and Mallinckrodt) have filed bankruptcy. The County has filed claims in the
bankruptcy cases. Counsel representing local governments and the Attorneys General
for states in the national litigation have developed a formula for distribution of settlement
proceeds. On 9/15/21, the BOCC approved a resolution that expressed approval for
the settlement formula. On 12/8/21, the BOCC approved a settlement agreement under
which the County is estimated to receive approximately $200K/year for 18 years
beginning in April 2022 if the settlement is finalized by the court.
2
Packet Pg. 2938
Q.1.a
Appellate Cases of Interest
9. AshBritt, Inc. v. Monroe County & FDOT, Third DCA Case 3D20-553 (lower tribunal:
16t" Jud. Cir. 17-CA-802-K). AshBritt sued the County for breach of contract and for
breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The County answered and
moved for summary judgment (MSJ). On 2/24/20, Judge Koenig denied the County's
MSJ. On 3/23/20, the County filed an appeal from that order in the Third DCA. The
case has been fully briefed. Oral argument was held on 3/10/21. Awaiting a decision.
10.Monroe County & State of Florida v. Donald Davis (Collins), Third DCA Case No. 3D21-
1078. The County and State were found liable for the inverse condemnation of Davis'
property. The County satisfied the $347,475 judgment on 11/22/19, leaving only the
issue of attorneys' fees and costs to be litigated. On 4/6/21, the trial court entered an
order approving a settlement agreement between Davis, the County, and the State on
the issue of fees and costs, denying Tobin and Mattson's motion to be added as parties
to pursue an additional award of fees against the County and State, and closing the
case. On 5/5/21, Tobin and Mattson filed an appeal of that order and their brief on
9/21/21. The County and State filed a motion for sanctions on 11/30/21. Answer briefs
were filed on 12/13/21. The reply brief is now due on 3/11/22.
c
11.Galleon Bay Corp. v. Monroe County and State of Florida — CA K 02-595/ 3D19-1783 /
SC21-409. This takings case resulted in a final judgment in the amount of $480,511. A
Satisfaction of Judgment was issued. Galleon Bay's motion to invalidate the final
judgment was denied by the Circuit Court on 8/16/19. On 9/13/19, Galleon Bay �?
appealed that order to the Third DCA. On 12/2/20, the Third DCA affirmed the order of
the trial court. The court also denied Galleon Bay's motion for attorneys' fees. Galleon
Bay filed an appeal of the Third DCA's decision to the Florida Supreme Court on .T
3/17/21. On 8/9/21, the Florida Supreme Court declined to exercise jurisdiction. The
deadline for Galleon Bay to seek relief from the U.S. Supreme Court expired on 11/8/21.
The parties are engaged in discovery on the only remaining issue of attorneys' fees. CD
12.William Guy v. Monroe County, 19-AP-3-P. This is a code compliance appeal by _
property owners found in violation for unlawful land clearing. Briefing is complete. Oral
argument was held on 10/29/21. Awaiting the decision of the court.
13.KRZ, LLC v. Monroe County, 20-AP-41-K. On 12/18/20, the property owners filed a
notice of appeal of the 11/19/20 Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found it in
violation of land clearing and filling standards in the Land Development Code. Oral
argument was held on 9/10/21. In an opinion issued 1/26/22, the court sustained
the decision of the Special Magistrate as to land clearing, and reversed the
decision as to the fill violation. The parties have 30 days to appeal.
14.Atlantic Circle, LLC v. Monroe County Planning Commission, 20-CA-48-P. The
Petitioner is seeking to quash a Planning Commission Resolution that approved with
conditions the request by Randolph Wall for a variance of 5 feet from the required 25-
foot primary front yard setback and a variance of 10 feet from the required 20-foot rear
yard setback. Briefing was completed on 8/7/20. Awaiting a decision.
3
Packet Pg. 2939
Q.1.a
15.Edwin and Janice Handte v. Monroe County, 20-AP-6-K/Third DCA Case No. 21-1527.
On 9/25/19, Planning Director denied property owners' application to be considered
exempt from the Land Development Code's vacation rental special permit and
manager license requirements. On 7/31/19, the Planning Commission denied property
owners' appeal of the Planning Director's decision. On 7/6/20, a DOAH hearing officer
denied the owners' appeal. Property owners appealed to the Circuit Court on 7/23/20.
On 6/29/21, the Circuit Court issued an appellate opinion affirming in favor of the
County on 6/29/21. On 7/27/21, the property owners filed an appeal to the Third DCA.
The property owner(s)filed their petition for a writ of certiorari on 10/19/21. On 12/10/21
the Third DCA granted the County's motion for an extension of time to file a response.
The County's response was filed on 1/7/22. Property owners did not filed a reply
by the 1/19/22 deadline.
CD
LN
16.Jonathan Herold v. Monroe County, 21-AP-10-P. On 11/1/21, the property owner filed
a notice of appeal of the Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found him in violation
for building activity without a permit. On 1/18/22, the Court granted the property _
owner's motion for an extension of time to file his initial brief until 4/10/22.
17.Joeandy Herrera & Jessica Herrera, 21-AP-0007-P. On 9/2/21, the property owners
filed a notice of appeal of the Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found them in
violation for building activity without a permit. On 1/27/22, the Court granted the
property owners' until 4/1/22 to file their initial brief.
18.Ricky Hill & Jayne Hill v. Monroe County, 20-AP-0004-P. The Special Magistrate found
the property owners in violation of the County's land clearing standards, which the Hills �?
appealed on 9/22/20. After several extensions, the Hills filed their initial brief on
1/26/22. The County's answer brief is due on 2/25/22.
N
19.Jacquelyn Bello v. Monroe County, 21-AP-0003-P. On 5/5/21, the property owner filed
a notice of appeal of the 4/6/21 Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found her in
violation for converting a utility shed into a guest house without a permit. On 11/22/21, CD
the property owner filed an unopposed motion for a 60-day extension of time to file her
initial brief. The court has not yet granted the motion. _
0
0.
20.Haves v. Monroe County, 19-AP-9-K/3D21-0632. On 10/15/19, the property owner filed
a notice of appeal of the 9/30/19 Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found him >_
in violation of LDC 110-140 and his building permit, which prohibited his expansion
improvement, or repair of the property's non-conforming lower enclosure. On 12/21/20,
the Circuit Court issued an opinion denying the property owner's appeal and affirming
the Special Magistrate's Final Order. The property owner filed a petition for a writ of
certiorari with the Third DCA on 4/24/21. On 1/28/22, the Third DCA granted the
petition and quashed the decision of the court below affirming the code
enforcement order.
21.Parrot Fish Bay, LLC v. Monroe County, 20-AP-2-P. On 2/27/20, the property owner
filed a notice of appeal of the 1/30/20 Final Order of the Special Magistrate the subject
property in violation of multiple landclearing and environmental violations (LDC 110-
140(a), 118-7, 118-11(a)(b), 118-13, and 122-8(d)(3)). Briefing is complete. Oral
argument was held on 10/15/21. Awaiting a decision.
4
Packet Pg. 2940
Q.1.a
22.Nicholas Sheckler v. Monroe County, 19-AP-7-K/3D21-464. On 7/25/19, the property
owner filed a notice of appeal of the 6/27/19 Final Order of the Special Magistrate that
found his structure to constitute an unsafe structure in multiple. On the morning of
11/4/20, prior to the Circuit Court's issuance or rendition of an appellate opinion, the
full amount of Monroe County's code enforcement lien was paid and fully satisfied,
rendering the appeal moot and subject to dismissal. Later that day, after the County's
code enforcement lien had been satisfied in full, the Circuit Court released an opinion
affirming in part and reversing in part the Final Order. On 1/8/21, upon Monroe County's
motion, the Circuit Court issued an order vacating its 11/4/20 opinion and dismissing
the appeal. The property owner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Third DCA
on 2/5/21. Monroe County filed its response on 5/19/21. On 6/22/21, the property owner
requested oral argument, and on 6/28/21 filed a reply. On 1/25/22, the Third DCA
denied the request for oral argument. Awaiting decision.
LN
cu
23.Steve Stone v. Monroe County, 21-AP-0008-P. On 9/2/21, the property owner filed a
notice of appeal of the Final Order of the Special Magistrate that found him in violation _
for building activity without a permit. The initial brief was filed on 1/24/22. The
County's answer brief is due on 2/23/22.
E
0
Administrative Cases of Interest
24.FKAA v. FDEP & Florida Power& Light, — DOAH Case Nos. 20-2967 (consolidated with
20-2968, Florida Fishing Guides Ass'n v. FPL). The FKAA filed an administrative U
petition challenging DEP's intent to issue a National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit to FPL to operate treatment and disposal facilities at Turkey
Point Power Plant. The County intervened in support of the FKAA. The final hearing `2
was held in January 2021. Both sides filed proposed recommended orders on 5/17/21;
awaiting decision of the administrative law judge.
N
25.Lower Density for Lower Sugarloaf, LLC, et al. v. Monroe County Planning Commission,
DOAH 21-494/21 CA574K. On 2/5/21, a group of property owners neighboring the _
proposed affordable-employee housing development filed an appeal to DOAH, seeking
to quash or reverse the Planning Commission's granting of a Major Conditional Use
permit to applicant Lower Keys Community Center Corp., and also on 2/5/21 filed a
parallel appeal of Resolution No. P36-20 to the BOCC sitting as an appellate body under
Chapter 139 of the Land Development Code. On 3/22/21, the developers intervened.
The appellants on 4/6/21 filed a motion for the DOAH ALJ to stay the DOAH proceeding,
which the DOAH ALJ denied on 4/26/21. After argument on 7/13/21, the ALJ issued a
final order on 7/22/21, upholding the Planning Commission's decision to approve the
project's major conditional use permit. On 8/23/21, the property owners filed a petition
for writ of certiorari in Circuit Court. Respondent Lower Keys Community Center filed
its response on 9/24/21. Monroe County filed its response on 9/29/21. On 12/22/21 the
parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to allow the property owners an
additional 30 days' time to file a Reply, in order to afford the developer and the property
owners extended time to discuss the possibility of reaching a settlement with
Respondent Lower Keys Community Center and Monroe County.
5
Packet Pg. 2941
Q.1.a
26.Diane Beruldsen, et al v. Monroe County, DOAH 21-1657GM. Administrative petition
challenging Ordinance 05-2021, amending Comp Plan to authorize 300 early
evacuation ROGOs that are to be used as exchange for existing affordable ROGOs was
filed on 5/21/21. The reclaimed ROGOs would be used for administrative relief. The
challenge is being held in abeyance until the related Cities' challenge is resolved by the
Third District in Case No. 3D20-1921, Mattino et al. v. City of Marathon, et al. Oral
argument in the Cities' case was held on 10/19/21. Awaiting a decision of the Third
DCA in Mattino case.
27.Elk Investments of Miami v. Monroe County Planning Department. On 7/6/21, the
property owner filed an appeal to the Planning Commission of the Department's 6/14/21
letter of understanding regarding the proposed development of a residential dwelling
unit at its vacant property in the URM Land Use District in Key Largo, FL (Parcel ID
00489136-018717). The Department determined that the property does not meet the
definition of "lot" and does not meet the requirements of the URM Land Use District in
order to allow the development of a residential dwelling unit. The owner is arguing that _
the decision is confiscatory. The Planning Commission upheld the Department's
decision on 10/27/21. The owner filed an appeal on or about 12/14/21 of the Planning
Commission's decision to DOAH (DOAH Case No. 21-003764). Monroe County's
Answer Brief was filed on 2/1/22; Appellant's Reply Brief (if any) is due 2/11/22.
0
28.6-7-8 US 1, LLC v. Monroe County Planning Department. On 5/7/21, the property owner
filed an appeal to the Planning Commission of the Department's 4/7/21 letter of
understanding regarding the attempted use of storage/shipping containers at its Key
Largo property in the SC land use district (Property Identification No. 00149430-
000000). The Department determined that the storage/shipping containers used for
commercial storage at the property were not subject to the property owner's conditional
use approval or building permit for the parcel, are structures that require a permit and
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, LDC, Chapter 6 of the County Code, the
Florida Building Code, local and FEMAflood regulations, and constitute non-residential
floor area as defined in the LDC and are subject to NROGO. The owner is disputing N
the Department's analysis and conclusions. The appeal is tentatively scheduled for
hearing at the Planning Commission's meeting in February.
0
29.Largo Management Co., Inc. v. Monroe County Planning Commission. On 10/6/21, the
property owner filed an appeal to the Planning Commission of the Department's 9/14/21 �-
letter of understanding regarding the applicant's proposal to increase the recognized ca
seating and seating capacity at two structures (a restaurant and a bar) situated on a SC
land use district-zoned property in Key Largo (Property ID No. 00504080-000000). The E
appeal will be scheduled for a future hearing date before the Planning
Commission.
30.WAYHI LLC v. Monroe County Planning Department. On 12/21/21, the property owner
filed an appeal to the Planning Commission of the Department's decision to deny the
property owner's development application to deposit fill and build a concrete retaining
wall and a concrete grade beam at its Tavernier property on the basis that the shoreline
of the subject property (Property ID No. 00446340-000000) has been identified
as/determined to be a turtle nesting beach and as the proposed construction does not
meet applicable setback(s). The appeal will be scheduled for a future hearing date
before the Planning Commission.
6
Packet Pg. 2942
Q.1.a
Vacation Rental Cases
31.Thurmond Street Partners, LLC v. Monroe County, Florida, 18AP10-K& 18AP11 K; Third
DCA Case 3D19-2367. Appeal of 2018 finding by Code Compliance Special Magistrate
that Thurmond Street Partners vacation wedding use violated Section 130-94 of the
Code. The property owner appealed to the Circuit Court, which reversed the Special
Magistrate's decision on 11/6/19; which the County appealed to the Third DCA on
12/6/19. The Third DCA stayed the case at the request of the parties. On 12/15/20, the
property owner and County staff held pre-application conferences. Letters of
Understanding resulting from the parties' pre-application conferences were issued on
2/18/21. The property owner filed its tier amendment application on 3/15/21. On
6/24/21, the Third DCA extended its stay to 1/17/22 at the request of the parties. On
9/29/21, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the BOCC deny the
property owner's application to amend its tier designation. The property owner
subsequently requested its follow-on tier amendment BOCC public hearing item to be _
tabled. The property owner now has until 4/22/22 to file rezoning and future land
use map change applications.
32.Buttonwood Key Largo v. Monroe County, 21-CA-0068-P. On 2/16/21, Buttonwood filed
a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, including a declaration of whether
the six-room former hotel is entitled to vacation rental permit exemptions pursuant to
LDC Section 134-1(b)(1) (despite the fact that Buttonwood's applications for such
exemptions were denied on 12/18/20, and the denials were not appealed), and an 0
injunction against code enforcement. The County filed its answer on 4/23/21, and has
since served discovery requests. A deposition of Mayte Santamaria was held on
12/16/21. All discovery propounded by Buttonwood was responded to on 12/17/21. N
33.Coral Hammock Rental, et al. v. Monroe County, 20-AP-11-K. On 10/29/20, the Special
Magistrate heard 47 vacation rental violation cases arising from Coral Hammock, found N
45 properties in violation, and assessed fines of $224,329 plus costs. Twenty-Six of
the 45 property owners found in violation appealed the final order to the Circuit
Court. The appeals were consolidated for purposes of briefing common issues of
law. Appellants filed their brief on 6/4/21. The County filed its brief on 10/22/21.
Appellants' reply brief was filed on 1/28/22. Awaiting setting of oral argument.
Constitutional Officer Cases ca
34.League of Women Voters of FL v. Sec'y of State Lee, Joyce Griffin, et al, 4-21-cv-001 86,
USDC/NDFL. Claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against Secretary of State,
the FLAG, and the Supervisors of Election for all 67 counties, challenging SIB 907 the
recently enacted elections legislation. Griffin and other SOEs retained outside counsel.
The County Attorney's Office is assisting in the defense. The other cases shown below
raise similar challenges to SIB 90. Supervisor Griffin has also been specifically named
as a defendant in those cases. All four cases were consolidated. Trial began on
1/31/22 before Judge Mark Walker in federal court in the League case first. The
other remaining election cases will be tried immediately following this case with
trial in all cases anticipated to conclude around February 15, 2022.
Packet Pg. 2943
Q.1.a
35.NAACP of FL v. Sec'y of State Lee, Joyce Griffin, et al, 4:21-cv-001 87, USDC/NDFL.
Claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against the Secretary of State and the
Supervisor of Elections for all 67 counties, challenging S1390, the recently enacted
elections legislation and raising some additional constitutional claims. This case has
been consolidated with the above League of Women Voters case and is being handled
by the same outside counsel. The County Attorney's Office continues to provide
assistance in the defense. Trial commenced 1/31/22.
36.Florida Rising Together, v. Sec'y of State Lee, Joyce Griffin, et al, 4:21-cv-201,
USDC/NDFL. Claim for injunctive and declaratory relief against Secretary Lee and the
Supervisor of Elections for all 67 counties, also challenging SB90 and asking to impose
a "pre-clearance" requirement on defendants which would require all changes in
election laws and procedures to be submitted to the U.S. Dept. of Justice for pre-
approval. This case was also consolidated with the above League of Women Voters
case and is being handled by the same outside counsel, with the County Attorney's
office providing assistance. Trial commenced 1/31/22. _
r_
0
Tort and/or Employment Law Cases
E
0
37.The County Attorney's Office is currently representing the County in the following
personal injury, property damage and employment law cases-
0
Acevedo v. Monroe County, S.D. Fla. 4:21-cv-10041-JEM Employment
Katzenstein v. Monroe County, 20-CA-177-P Personal Injury
Solomon v. Monroe County et al., 20-CA-206-M Personal Injury
N
Barter v. Monroe County, 21-CA-418-K Personal Injury
Thompson v. Monroe County Jones Act
Goodman v. Monroe County, S.D. Fla. 4:21-cv-10099-DPG Employment
Francisco Salazar v. FDOT and Monroe County, 21-CA-715-K Personal injury
Other Matters of Interest
38.Code Collections. During January 2022, staff collected $86,083.60 in code <
compliance fines and costs. Cumulatively through the first four months of FY22, staff
has collected $446,545.42 in fines and costs, including after-the-fact fees.
39.Vacation Rental Prosecutions. No vacation rental violations were presented to the
Special Magistrate at the 1/27/22 hearing.
g
Packet Pg. 2944
Q.1.a
Risk Management
40.Risk Management activity in January 2022 was as shown below. Also see the
attached report from EBIX showing collection and review of insurance policies
conducted by Risk for County vendors.
Claims:
County Property (CP) 5
Auto Physical (AP) 5
General Liability (GL) 0
cv
Auto Liability (AL) 1
cv
Flood policy renewals: 0 policies
Insurance Policy renewals: 0 policies
Vehicle/Equipment addition and deletion: 0 vehicles/equipment added or
deleted
Open Pending Risk claims over past 5 years
(including claims being monitored and/or
handled by Risk Management and claims being
litigated by Monroe County Attorney's Office):
AP claims 58
CP claims 86
AL claims 8 '✓
GL claims 58
Large Dollar Amount Claims:
Current GL above $10,000 3
cv
Current AL above $3,000 1 CD
Past AP and CP above $3,000 going back 5 25
years
0
Agenda Items Reviewed past month 46
9
Packet Pg. 2945
Q.1.a
Public Records
41.The County Attorney's Office serves as the coordinator of public records requests for
the County. During the month of January 2022, the office processed a total of 77
requests and assisted other departments with fulfilling an additional 192 requests for a
total of 269 public records requests. Please see below for further details-
Monroe rO 0nk Public Records PerformanceReport
January 1 , to January 31 2022All Departments
&quest Received
N
Requests Closed
Day(s) to FUlfillaien 2
(NI char clays required tO fUlfill request in r poi ing Period �
r-
0
The County Attorney's Office fulf'41ted 77 of the �
received requests. Beiow is a breakdown cif requests �
processed by each department
(i 10TE. some requests have more than one department
ssi ned thus the number can adld Lip to nnore than 272 or 2.69)
0
Building New 156 dosed 156
Code Compliance 7 New 15 Closed 1.7 >
County .attorney - New 46 dosed 4.
County .attorney f uiilding, Requests) New 32 Closed 32
Airport Services - New 2 Closed 2
FR - New 4 dosed 2 �
OMBI - New IS Closed 1
Planning - New 14 Closed 1
10
Packet Pg. 2946
Q.1.b
Monroe County Florida Management Reports
Month End Program Summary
Month Ending: January 2022
Active Insureds 331
Active Insureds With Evidence of Coverage 319
Active Insureds With Current Coverage 254
Active Insureds With No Coverage Ill
331
cv
350 N
300 N
t. {
250 f
200 2
150 319 254
100
50 =- 11
January 2022
E
Active Insureds Active with Current Cov.
Active With Cert. Active With No Cov
0
U
Volume Per NN
1/2022 YTD Active Insured
N
Number of Document Pages Processed 424 424 18.61
Number of Phone Calls 0 0 0.15
0
Number of Notices Sent 160 160 4.60
x
500 1.2 200
400 1 150
300 0.8
200 0.6 100
0.4 50
100 0.2
099 0 0
1/2022 1/2022 January 2022
UM Doc. Pages I Phone Calls Notices Sent
No Doc. Pages YTD Phone Calls YTD No Notices Sent YTD
1/2022 YTD
Number of Monroe County Florida Website 70 70
Logins
Packet Pg. 2947
Q.1.b
Top 5 Deficiencies
1 Expired Policy 122 Em
2 Owned, Scheduled, Hired, & Non-Owned 58
Autos are not properly identified.
3 Insurance Carrier name not found in A.M. 26
Best Rating Guide:
4 Insurance Carrier does not meet the 21
required A.M. Best rating of
5 We are not properly named as an 19
Additional Insured.
CD
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
E
0
T r
0
U
N
N
CD
c
** DOES NOT include Expiring or ANY Minor Deficiencies
Z
Packet Pg. 2948
Q.1.c
Total fines and CUMULATIVE TO
MONTH FINES COSTS Costs ATF FEES FEMA INSP TOTAL ALL DATE
Oct-21 59,912.50 13,524.56 73,437.06 11,040.00 0.00 84,477.06 84,477.06
Nov-21 83,787.50 13,669.88 97,457.38 12,800.00 0.00 110,257.38 194,734.44
Dec-21 105,174.62 13,502.76 118,677.38 35,500.00 0.00 154,177.38 348,911.82
Jan-22 72,278.49 13,805.11 86,083.60 11,550.00 0.00 97,633.60 446,545.42
Feb-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mar-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Apr-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
May-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Jun-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Jul-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Aug-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sep-22 0.00 0.00 0.00
E
2021-2022 TOTALS 321,153.11 54,502.31 375,655.42 70,890.00 0.00 446,545.42 cm
cm
a
Oct-20 110,118.18 8,468.94 118,587.12 12,000.00 0.00 130,587.12 130,587.12
Nov-20 274,496.96 18,626.30 293,123.26 12,049.00 0.00 305,172.26 435,759.38 d
u-
Dec-20 371,537.44 21,711.75 393,249.19 24,465.50 0.00 417,714.69 853,474.07 t
Jan-21 40,231.44 6,155.62 46,387.06 17,477.00 0.00 63,864.06 917,338.13 d
Feb-21 82,488.84 7,119.61 89,608.45 16,802.40 0.00 106,410.85 1,023,748.98 w
Mar-21 153,210.14 11,740.03 164,950.17 13,289.33 0.00 178,239.50 1,201,988.48
Apr-21 54,765.14 10,410.67 65,175.81 22,361.00 0.00 87,536.81 1,289,525.29 `o
May-21 133,087.50 13,693.82 146,781.32 38,452.50 0.00 185,233.82 1,474,759.11 ¢
Jun-21 108,284.38 11,984.20 120,268.58 14,324.80 0.00 134,593.38 1,609,352.49
Jul-21 48,132.91 12,330.99 60,463.90 16,705.00 0.00 77,168.90 1,686,521.39 o'
Aug-21 95,416.47 17,905.63 113,322.10 16,500.00 0.00 129,822.10 1,816,343.49 "
cm Sep-21 834,980.91 34,127.76 869,108.67 17,715.00 0.00 886,823.67 2,703,167.16 c
cm
r
2020-2021 TOTALS 2,306,750.31 174,275.32 2,481,025.63 222,141.53 0.00 2,703,167.16
z
Oct-19 214,502.00 23,106.65 237,608.65 14,184.24 0.00 251,792.89 251,792.89
Nov-19 106,074.69 13,167.07 119,241.76 38,919.00 0.00 158,160.76 409,953.65 0
Dec-19 93,199.37 28,049.18 121,248.55 27,080.00 0.00 148,328.55 558,282.20 ¢
Jan-20 79,016.84 9,927.40 88,944.24 26,054.50 0.00 114,998.74 673,280.94
Feb-20 105,812.50 12,011.18 117,823.68 13,738.00 0.00 131,561.68 804,842.62
Mar-20 97,165.30 5,403.80 102,569.10 5,000.00 0.00 107,569.10 912,411.72 0
Apr-20 60,448.51 14,526.09 74,974.60 7,000.00 0.00 81,974.60 994,386.32 w
May-20 29,800.00 2,856.07 32,656.07 3,834.00 0.00 36,490.07 1,030,876.39 a
Jun-20 50,271.07 10,607.60 60,878.67 20,400.00 0.00 81,278.67 1,112,155.06
Jul-20 62,323.66 5,395.02 67,718.68 10,612.42 0.00 78,331.10 1,190,486.16
Aug-20 124,395.25 12,106.57 136,501.82 18,872.50 0.00 155,374.32 1,345,860.48 O
Sep-20 155,989.83 13,770.09 169,759.92 8,368.52 0.00 178,128.44 1,523,988.92 o
z
2019-2020 TOTALS 1,178,999.02 150,926.72 1,329,925.74 194,063.18 0.00 1,523,988.92 w
z
u-
Oct-18 253,116.80 18,009.84 271,126.64 6,778.00 0.00 277,904.64 277,904.64 w
Nov-18 125,598.96 10,889.53 136,488.49 24,794.50 0.00 161,282.99 439,187.63
Dec-18 88,200.00 9,355.32 97,555.32 6,700.00 0.00 104,255.32 543,442.95 ¢
Jan-19 69,500.00 6,586.43 76,086.43 11,320.00 0.00 87,406.43 630,849.38
c
Feb-19 163,410.90 13,655.94 177,066.84 13,031.50 0.00 190,098.34 820,947.72
E
Mar-19 123,729.53 11,289.45 135,018.98 28,210.00 0.00 163,228.98 984,176.70
Apr-19 117,602.07 10,149.71 127,751.78 30,490.00 0.00 158,241.78 1,142,418.48
May-19 226,445.80 21,179.45 247,625.25 52,601.00 0.00 300,226.25 1,442,644.73 ¢
Jun-19 170,542.05 14,618.43 185,160.48 18,602.00 0.00 203,762.48 1,646,407.21
Jul-19 51,927.51 22,316.50 74,244.01 42,935.94 0.00 117,179.95 1,763,587.16
Aug-19 139,884.82 22,736.88 162,621.70 16,000.00 0.00 178,621.70 1,942,208.86
Sep-19 142,855.12 21,742.25 164,597.37 18,699.76 0.00 183,297.13 2,125,505.99
2018-2019 TOTALS 1,672,813.56 182,529.73 1,855,343.29 270,162.70 0.00 2,125,505.99
Oct-17 91,400.00 5,555.74 96,955.74 0.00 0.00 96,955.74 96,955.74
Nov-17 82,378.03 2,081.75 84,459.78 1,000.00 0.00 85,459.78 182,415.52
Dec-17 221,965.50 10,273.34 232,238.84 2,500.00 0.00 234,738.84 417,154.36
Jan-18 12,258.00 2,411.06 14,669.06 2,549.00 0.00 17,218.06 434,372.42
Feb-18 117,628.00 9,725.40 127,353.40 4,527.00 0.00 131,880.40 566,252.82
OACODE COMPLIANCE\FINES AND COSTS REPORTS\2022\JANUARY\MASTER FINES AND COSTS SPREADSHEET AS OF JANUARY 2022
Packet Pg.2949
Q.1.c
Total fines and CUMULATIVE TO
MONTH FINES COSTS Costs ATF FEES FEMA INSP TOTAL ALL DATE
Mar-18 131,855.80 5,855.52 137,711.32 8,198.00 0.00 145,909.32 712,162.14
Apr-18 102,294.74 9,032.96 111,327.70 18,776.00 0.00 130,103.70 842,265.84
May-18 234,644.55 12,005.31 246,649.86 12,963.00 0.00 259,612.86 1,101,878.70
Jun-18 159,579.18 15,627.12 175,206.30 7,000.00 0.00 182,206.30 1,284,085.00
Jul-18 178,590.00 12,735.62 191,325.62 9,100.00 0.00 200,425.62 1,484,510.62
Aug-18 305,175.19 25,319.00 330,494.19 8,500.00 0.00 338,994.19 1,823,504.81
Sep-18 194,858.92 11,751.09 206,610.01 10,500.00 0.00 217,110.01 2,040,614.82
2017-2018 TOTALS 1,832,627.91 122,373.91 1,955,001.82 85,613.00 0.00 2,040,614.82
Oct-16 217,650.79 13,725.86 231,376.65 4,400.00 0.00 235,776.65 235,776.65
Nov-16 227,785.20 19,645.28 247,430.48 5,000.00 0.00 252,430.48 488,207.13
Dec-16 265,695.00 17,792.51 283,487.51 9,614.00 0.00 293,101.51 781,308.64
Jan-17 20,211.00 4,373.92 24,584.92 1,000.00 0.00 25,584.92 806,893.56
Feb-17 75,765.37 8,548.48 84,313.85 0.00 0.00 84,313.85 891,207.41
cm
Mar-17 148,287.86 12,850.64 161,138.50 5,430.00 0.00 166,568.50 1,057,775.91
Apr-17 44,886.86 8,739.36 53,626.22 6,500.00 0.00 60,126.22 1,117,902.13
May-17 99,402.60 12,369.67 111,772.27 5,850.00 0.00 117,622.27 1,235,524.40 2
Jun-17 78,697.00 9,474.69 88,171.69 8,402.00 0.00 96,573.69 1,332,098.09 u
Jul-17 89,965.00 12,458.67 102,423.67 2,000.00 0.00 104,423.67 1,436,521.76 a
Aug-17 216,371.93 10,646.72 227,018.65 5,781.00 0.00 232,799.65 1,669,321 41
Sep-1 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,669,321.41
2016-2017 Totals 1,484,718.61 130,625.80 1,615,344.41 53,977.00 0.00 1,669,321.41 E
0
Oct-15 61,426.72 10,511.57 71,938.29 7,750.00 0.00 79,688.29 79,688.29
Nov-15 48,354.30 11,793.36 60,147.66 4,973.00 0.00 65,120.66 1441808.95
Dec-15 62,632.50 6,632.92 69,265.42 2,000.00 0.00 71,265.42 216,074.37 u
Jan-16 107,268.81 9,832.65 117,101.46 3,950.00 0.00 121,051.46 337,125.83 cm
Feb-16 51,280.56 4,053.38 55,333.94 5,700.00 0.00 61,033.94 398,159.77
Mar-16 90,377.88 9,444.40 99,822.28 3,500.00 0.00 103,322.28 501,482.05
Apr-16 195,134.49 9,909.37 205,043.86 11,950.00 0.00 216,993.86 718,475.91
May-16 116,788.89 10,038.53 126,827.42 5,750.00 0.00 132,577.42 851,053.33 z
Jun-16 76,766.16 15,398.33 92,164.49 5,450.00 0.00 97,614.49 948,667.82
Jul-16 55,079.02 7,142.74 62,221.76 3,000.00 0.00 65,221.76 1,013,889.58 O
Aug-16 56,431.52 8,022.33 64,453.85 2,255.00 0.00 66,708.85 1,080,598.43 ¢
Sep-16 76,726.41 9,679.07 86,405.48 8,400.00 0.00 94,805.48 1,175,403.91 w
2015-2016 Totals 998,267.26 112,458.65 1,110,725.91 64,678.00 0.00 1,175,403.91
Oct-14 54,290.83 10,089.61 64,380.44 2,000.00 0.00 66,380.44 66,380.44 uj
Nov-14 6,937.50 2,320.91 9,258.41 5,293.00 0.00 14,551.41 80,931.85
Dec-14 32,966.67 5,214.20 38,180.87 8,604.00 0.00 46,784.87 127,716.72
Jan-15 3,591.67 1,707.54 5,299.21 4,500.00 0.00 9,799.21 137,515.93
Feb-15 57,802.61 9,142.24 66,944.85 5,537.40 0.00 72,482.25 209,998.18
Mar-15 68,916.67 6,091.97 75,008.64 8,060.00 0.00 83,068.64 293,066.82 0
z
A r-15 50,862.50 3,932.05 54,794.55 8,665.00 0.00 63,459.55 356,526.37 ¢
Ma -15 38,366.66 5,229.36 43,596.02 9,666.30 0.00 53,262.32 409,788.69 w
Jun-15 25,259.58 7,955.08 33,214.66 4,830.00 0.00 38,044.66 447,833.35 z
Jul-15 68,735.00 9,488.79 78,223.79 10,450.00 0.00 88,673.79 536,507.14 w
Aug-1 5 27,778.66 6,091.43 33,870.09 8,707.10 0.00 42,577.19 579,084.33
Sep-1 5 44,422.72 5,214.04 49,636.76 9,125.00 0.00 58,761.76 637,846.09 <
2014-2015 Totals 479,931.07 72,477.22 552,408.29 85,437.80 0.00 637,846.09
c
d
Oct-1 35,349.96 3,466.03 38,815.99 7,525.00 0.00 46,340.99 46,340.99
Nov-13 30,809.25 4,138.09 34,947.34 3,250.00 0.00 38,197.34 84,538.33 2
Dec-13 27,691.63 4,865.47 32,557.10 6,150.00 0.00 38,707.10 123,245.43 ¢
Jan-14 41,804.65 1,752.21 43,556.86 3,000.00 0.00 46,556.86 169,802.29
Feb-14 51,544.58 5,485.34 57,029.92 4,000.00 0.00 61,029.92 230,832.21
Mar-14 28,856.45 5,053.71 33,910.16 4,000.00 0.00 37,910.16 268,742.37
A r-14 22,908.66 5,418.39 28,327.05 8,500.00 0.00 36,827.05 305,569.42
Ma -14 8,691.99 3,152.10 11,844.09 10,558.00 0.00 22,402.09 327,971.51
327,971.51
Jun-14 79,184.00 14,272.72 93,456.72 7,000.00 0.00 100,456.72 428,428.23
Jul-14 12,108.94 6,453.84 18,562.78 7,500.00 0.00 26,062.78 454,491.01
Au -14 11,275.03 2,842.32 14,117.35 4,994.00 0.00 19,111.35 473,602.36
Se -14 53,768.00 8,782.68 62,550.68 8,196.40 0.00 70,747.08 544,349.44
2013-2014 Totals 403,993.14 65,682.90 469,676.04 74,673.40 0.00 544,349.44
Oct-12 39,950.541 6,278.671 46,229.211 7,250.001 990.001 54,469.211 54,469.21
OACODE COMPLIANCE\FINES AND COSTS REPORTS\2022\JANUARY\MASTER FINES AND COSTS SPREADSHEET AS OF JANUARY 2022
Packet Pg.2950
Q.1.c
Total fines and CUMULATIVE TO
MONTH FINES COSTS Costs ATF FEES FEMA INSP TOTAL ALL DATE
Nov-12 17,416.97 1,461.55 18,878.52 3,700.00 720.00 23,298.52 77,767.73
Dec-12 56,966.98 9,203.80 66,170.78 3,500.00 270.00 69,940.78 147,708.51
Jan-13 30,599.96 7,206.40 37,806.36 3,880.00 450.00 42,136.36 189,844.87
Feb-13 29,600.30 6,145.60 35,745.90 3,500.00 270.00 39,515.90 229,360.77
Mar-13 15,821.30 4,406.98 20,228.28 5,200.00 270.00 25,698.28 255,059.05
Apr-13 27,074.31 3,678.13 30,752.44 3,000.00 810.00 34,562.44 289,621.49
May-13 32,386.69 5,795.00 38,181.69 4,000.00 450.00 42,631.69 332,253.18
Jun-13 14,466.64 2,912.69 17,379.33 3,000.00 360.00 20,739.33 352,992.51
Jul-13 25,166.66 2,245.54 27,412.20 6,313.60 90.00 33,815.80 386,808.31
Aug-13 32,566.64 1,450.56 34,017.20 5,800.00 0.00 39,817.20 426,625.51
Sep-13 51,324.96 3,330.80 54,655.76 3,750.00 0.00 58,405.76 485,031.27
2012-2013 Totals 373,341.95 54,115.72 427,457.67 52,893.60 4,680.00 485,031.27
Oct-11 64,020.50 6,892.20 70,912.70 3,500.00 2,430.00 76,842.70 76,842.70
Nov-11 8,800.00 3,386.36 12,186.36 2,000.00 1,170.00 15,356.36 92,199.06 cm
0
Dec-11 3,550.00 2,635.70 6,185.70 2,500.00 1,800.00 10,485.70 102,684.76 cm
Jan-12 21,300.00 4,725.41 26,025.41 3,000.00 1,620.00 30,645.41 133,330.17 `m
Feb-12 28,546.66 3,695.38 32,242.04 1,800.00 1,440.00 35,482.04 168,812.21 .5
Mar-12 31,925.00 5,516.99 37,441.99 3,500.00 1,620.00 42,561.99 211,374.20 u
Apr-12 36,696.66 2,693.08 39,389.74 4,000.00 1,800.00 45,189.74 256,563.94 a
May-12 65,617.33 6,176.11 71,793.44 4,060.00 1,530.00 77,383.44 333,947.38
Jun-12 5,217.00 667.39 5,884.39 2,000.00 810.00 8,694.39 342,641.77
Jul-12 28,433.32 6,782.45 35,215.77 1,590.00 1,080.00 37,885.77 380,527.54
0
Aug-12 7,917.30 9,126.20 17,043.50 4,745.00 630.00 22,418.50 402,946.04
Sep-12 15,350.00 600.79 15,950.79 2,000.00 720.00 18,670.79 421,616.83
2011-2012 Totals 317,373.77 52,898.06 370,271.83 34,695.00 16,650.00 421,616.83
e,
Oct-10 28,433.00 5,430.21 33,863.21 0.00 0.00 33,863.21 33,863.21 cm
Nov-10 28,234.78 4,972.51 33,207.29 1,000.00 2,070.00 36,277.29 70,140.50 c,
Dec-10 36,730.68 3,159.63 39,890.31 9,800.00 2,160.00 51,850.31 121,990.81 >-
Jan-11 42,444.08 5,188.79 47,632.87 5,405.00 1,980.00 55,017.87 177,008.68
Feb-11 26,727.00 5,126.63 31,853.63 3,220.00 2,060.00 37,133.63 214,142.31 ¢
Mar-11 55,517.56 9,022.78 64,540.34 14,283.00 3,240.00 82,063.34 296,205.65
Apr-11 20,201.00 5,076.11 25,277.11 1,500.00 2,340.00 29,117.11 325,322.76 O
May-11 19,470.50 5,792.91 25,263.41 2,500.00 3,960.00 31,723.41 357,046.17 ¢
Jun-11 19,154.96 6,489.46 25,644.42 3,000.00 2,880.00 31,524.42 388,570.59 w
Jul-11 17,625.00 2,691.82 20,316.82 1,500.00 1,710.00 23,526.82 412,097.41
Aug-11 58,432.00 5,282.78 63,714.78 3,000.00 3,330.00 70,044.78 482,142.19 ¢
Sep-11 20,700.00 4,253.46 24,953.46 2,000.00 2,340.00 29,293.46 511,435.65 w
w
2010-2011 Totals 373,670.56 62,487.09 436,157.65 47,208.00 28,070.00 511,435.65 a
r
Oct-09 2,605.25 2,197.76 4,803.01 0.00 1,950.00 6,753.01 6,753.01
Nov-09 24,337.98 2,518.11 26,856.09 0.00 1,620.00 28,476.09 35,229.10
Dec-09 17,897.58 2,459.76 20,357.34 0.00 2,320.00 22,677.34 57,906.44
Jan-10 24,351.33 1,929.51 26,280.84 0.00 1,800.00 28,080.84 85,987.28
Feb-10 1,191.33 1,368.20 2,559.53 0.00 1,260.00 3,819.53 89,806.81 z
Mar-10 5,621.83 3,705.74 9,327.57 500.00 2,760.00 12,587.57 102,394.38 "-
w
Apr-10 4,500.00 8,299.61 12,799.61 1,000.00 2,950.00 16,749.61 119,143.99 N
May-10 29,587.00 3,703.34 33,290.34 2,000.00 2,820.00 38,110.34 157,254.33
Jun-10 16,608.36 5,017.01 21,625.37 10,070.00 1,890.00 33,585.37 190,839.70
Jul-10 5,583.00 4,096.95 9,679.95 2,500.00 1,350.00 13,529.95 204,369.65 5
Aug-10 15,866.00 5,164.69 21,030.69 13,068.80 2,250.00 36,349.49 240,719.14 E
Sep-10 35,556.50 2,375.07 37,931.57 0.00 0.00 37,931.57 278,650.71
2009-2010 Totals 183,706.16 42,835.75 226,541.91 29,138.80 22,970.00 278,650.71
Oct-08 8,226.62 893.85 9,120.47 0.00 2,610.00 11,730.47 11,730.47
Nov-08 4,047.50 153.22 4,200.72 0.00 2,340.00 6,540.72 18,271.19
Dec-08 6,768.75 2,091.65 8,860.40 0.00 2,700.00 11,560.40 29,831.59
Jan-09 1,000.00 667.86 1,667.86 0.00 2,770.00 4,437.86 34,269.45
Feb-09 31,413.26 1,493.71 32,906.97 0.00 2,070.00 34,976.97 69,246.42
Mar-09 21,275.00 1,082.51 22,357.51 0.00 2,770.00 25,127.51 94,373.93
Apr-09 7,996.37 531.28 8,527.65 0.00 2,830.00 11,357.65 105,731.58
May-09 101,604.72 5,039.96 106,644.68 0.00 2,170.00 108,814.68 214,546.26
Jun-09 15,682.82 4,887.75 20,570.57 0.00 1,980.00 22,550.57 237,096.83
Jul-09 25,378.25 1,999.07 27,377.321 0.001 1,710.001 29,087.321 2661184.15
Aug-09 21,447.00 3,303.99 24,750.991 0.001 1,610.001 26,360.991 292,545.14
Sep-09 12,252.82 2,744.001 14,996.821 0.001 1,440.001 16,436.821 308,981.96
OACODE COMPLIANCE\FINES AND COSTS REPORTS\2022\JANUARY\MASTER FINES AND COSTS SPREADSHEET AS OF JANUARY 2022
Packet Pg.2951
Q.1.c
Total fines and CUMULATIVE TO
MONTH FINES COSTS Costs ATF FEES FEMA INSP TOTAL ALL DATE
2008-2009 Totals 257,093.11 24,888.85 281,981.96 0.00 27,000.00 308,981.96
Oct-07 7,570.00 725.00 8,295.00 0.00 50.00 8,345.00 8,345.00
Nov-07 6,500.50 500.00 7,000.50 0.00 1,350.00 8,350.50 16,695.50
Dec-07 1,660.35 618.50 2,278.85 0.00 1,980.00 4,258.85 20,954.35
Jan-08 1,657.00 100.00 1,757.00 0.00 2,610.00 4,367.00 25,321.35
Feb-08 9,000.00 300.00 9,300.00 0.00 2,250.00 11,550.00 36,871.35
Mar-08 33,105.50 400.00 33,505.50 0.00 2,880.00 36,385.50 73,256.85
Apr-08 3,118.50 738.53 3,857.03 0.00 3,510.00 7,367.03 80,623.88
May-08 8,425.00 526.04 8,951.04 0.00 3,140.00 12,091.04 92,714.92
Jun-08 14,100.00 170.71 14,270.71 0.00 3,960.00 18,230.71 110,945.63
Jul-08 1,350.00 135.02 1,485.02 0.00 2,230.00 3,715.02 114,660.65
Aug-08 8,000.00 600.00 8,600.00 0.00 2,980.00 11,580.00 126,240.65
Sep-08 6,212.50 200.83 6,413.33 0.00 2,250.00 8,663.33 134,903.98
2007-2008 Totals 100,699.35 5,014.63 105,713.98 0.00 29,190.00 134,903.98 cm
cm
a
Oct-06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Nov-06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dec-06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 u
Jan-07 10,918.00 1,500.00 12,418.00 0.00 0.00 12,418.00 12,418.00 0
Feb-07 1,500.00 1,823.55 3,323.55 0.00 0.00 3,323.55 15,741.55
Mar-07 2,150.00 1,001.95 3,151.95 0.00 0.00 3,151.95 18,893.50
Apr-07 4,017.70 902.70 4,920.40 0.00 0.00 4,920.40 23,813.90 E
0
May-07 21,060.00 900.00 21,960.00 0.00 0.00 21,960.00 45,773.90
Jun-07 1,250.00 3,585.00 4,835.00 0.00 0.00 4,835.00 50,608.90
Jul-07 8,399.98 1,207.50 9,607.48 0.00 0.00 9,607.48 60,216.38
Aug-07 7,640.00 1,600.00 9,240.00 0.00 0.00 9,240.00 69,456.38 U
Sep-07 12,157.00 1,000.00 13,157.00 0.00 0.00 13,157.00 82,613.38 cm
2007 Totals 69,092.68 13,520.70 82,613.38 0.00 0.00 82,613.38 0
r
z
w
r
w
w
x
w
a
r
e,
z
rn
w
z
u-
w
w
r
c
d
E
s
v
0
OACODE COMPLIANCE\FINES AND COSTS REPORTS\2022\JANUARY\MASTER FINES AND COSTS SPREADSHEET AS OF JANUARY 2022
Packet Pg.2952