Item C26BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: October 17, 2012 Division: County Administrator
Bulk Item: Yes Department: Airports
Staff Contact Person/Phone #: Peter Horton, 809-5200
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of Jacobs Project Management Co.'s Task Order #12-14-12 for
the Emergency Drainage Corrective Action Plan, at the Key West International Airport
ITEM BACKGROUND: This project is included in our FAA grant funding for 2012.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION FAA grant #3-12-037-046-2012 is included on this meeting's
agenda for ratification.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: NA
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
TOTAL COST: $151,960 INDIRECT COST: NA BUDGETED: yes
DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: NA
COST TO COUNTY: NA
COST TO AIRPORT: $15,196
COST TO PFC: NA
REVENUE PRODUCING: NA
APPROVED BY: County Attorney
DOCUMENTATION: Included X
SOURCE OF FUNDS: FAA, Airport Operating
AMOUNT PER YEAR: NA
OMB/Purchasing Risk Management
Not Required
DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM #
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONTRACT SUMMARY
Contract #
Contract with: Jacobs Project Management Co.
Effective Date: Execution
Expiration Date: 180 days
Contract Purpose/Description: Task Order #12-14-12 for the Emergency Drainage Corrective Action
Plan, at the Key West International Airport
Contract Manager: Peter Horton # 5200 Airports - Stop # 5
(name) (Ext.) (Department/ Stop)
for BOCC meeting on: October 17, 2012 Agenda Deadline: October 2, 2012
Total Dollar Value of Contract: $151,960
Budgeted? Yes
Grant: Yes - FAA
County Match: Operating
Estimated Ongoing Costs: n/a
(not included in dollar value above
Date In
Airports Director IC / i /t9...
Risk Management10
O.M.B./Purchasing 16
County Attorney / � //
Comments:
CONTRACT COSTS
Current Year Portion: 0
Account Codes: pending set up for grant #037-046
ADDITIONAL COSTS
For:
e ,maintenance, utilities, janitorial, salaries etc.
CONTRACT REVIEW
Changes
Needed
Yes No
Reviewer
Risk Management
Date Out
245 Riverside Avenue
Suite 300
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
1.904.636,5432 Fax 1,904,636,5433
Peter Horton September 11, 2012
Airport Director
Monroe County Airports
Key West International Airport
3491 South Roosevelt Blvd.
Key West, FL 33040
Re: PSO # 12 Emergency Drainage Corrective Action Plan - EYW
Dear Peter,
Attached please find three (3) original signed copies of PSO # 12 Emergency Drainage Corrective Action
Plan - EYW. These are being submitted for your review and approval. We understand that this PSO will
have to be submitted for Monroe County Board of County Commissioner's approval. Please return the
executed PSO as soon as possible so that we can commence work on this project.
We do not have a list of your Client Project Numbers for the blank in the upper left hand side of the Task
Order From. Therefore if you could please add the appropriate Client Project Number in the appropriate
blank on the Task Order Form we would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Eric S. Nielsen, P.E.
Project Manager
att
cc: Jack Renton/Jacobs
Jacob Engineering Group Inc,
Effective Date
Client Project No.
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Task Order No. 12/ 14-12
Engineer Project No. E9Y16712
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master Agreement for
Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client') and JACOBS PROJECT
MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant'), dated November 16, 2011 ("Agreement'). The Agreement is
incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized: EMERGENCY DRAINAGE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN - EYW
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Engineering_ Services described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 16 page(s).
Pricing
N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
X Firm Fixed Price of $ 151,960.00 .
N/A Other (Describe):
Schedule
Services may commence on Receipt of signed Professional Services Task Order Form
Services will cease by 180 calendar days from receipt of executed Professional Services Task Order Form
Other
(SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Witness �4 roa����
Title
t ?
File: HSTR APS - dlonroe County
By
Mayor/Chairman
CONSULTANT:
JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
By- �sm
-J C®
19
Page •R
yr�
V
s 1;
For the purposes of this Scope of Work, the term COUNTY refers to Monroe County, and
CONSULTANT refers to Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.. This Scope of Work outlines the
Program for Storm Water Improvements for Key West International Airport (EYW). The
Program will consist of a Series of Task Orders that will address the immediate needs as
identified in the FAA, June 26, 2012, inspection letter and a comprehensive Storm Water Master
Plan (SWMP). The Study Area is the Airfield, inside the Airport security fence, as shown on
Figure 1.
1 .0 D1 1.14 .
• 1 1
CONSULTANT shall serve as the County's Stormwater Master Plan Consultant.
Consultant shall avoid duplication of efforts and shall maximize all synergistic
opportunities when feasible. Consultant shall make known to County
immediately, by telephone or email, whenever such synergistic opportunities or
any identified opportunities to avoid duplication occur, and shall follow up in
writing immediately thereafter, within 24 hours at latest.
Consultant shall review all reports, findings and recommendations by the prior
Stormwater Master Plan consultants, and following such review shall identify any
specific issues or recommendations that are not covered in this scope and in the
opinion of Consultant warrant consideration. If necessary, Consultant will make
written request for any additional services not already covered in this scope.
1.1.1 INVENTORY AND EVALUATE EXISTING INFORMATION
CONSULTANT will collect and evaluate existing available data from the
COUNTY, agencies having jurisdiction, and from other airport consultants, past
and present, via requests through the COUNTY as necessary, including:
Page 1 of 16
A. Available as-builts surveys, and/or design drawings of stormwater or
drainage facilities contained within the study area of Key West International
Airport (EYW), including pipes, channels, swales, and information on
control structures and outfalls. Data for these facilities will include
locations, geometries/shapes, sizes, inverts, crowns, and cross sections.
CONSULTANT will conduct a limited amount of verification under Task
1.3 FIELD DATA.
B. Storm drainage master plans for the entire airport or specific areas, and all
other storm drainage master plans to date.
C. Topographic and aerial planimetric maps including contours, roads,
buildings, runways, water bodies, and wetlands (as available).
D. Stormwater permits from South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) or COUNTY.
E. Point source and stormwater NPDES permits.
F. Inventory of pollution control devices including data on location, size,
design flow rate and maintenance. This includes swales, exfiltration
trenches, retention basins, detention ponds, drainage wells, and oil -water
separators.
G. Information on location, extent, quantity and type of groundwater and soil
contamination (if any).
H. Reports on Hydrocarbon and other Contamination Recovery Programs
underway (if any).
1. Procedures to control spills in order to minimize detrimental effects.
J. Soils data including results of percolation, exfiltration, open trench and
other tests already performed. CONSULTANT will use the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soil
survey, where site specific data are not available.
K. Available records of high water marks, flooding, canal water levels, control
structures operation schedules and rainfall data. CONSULTANT will obtain
these available data from the COUNTY, SFWMD and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data center
(NCDC) as applicable.
L. Permit forms, regulations and requirements from governmental permitting
agencies (FAA, Army Corp of Engineers, FDEP, SFWMD).
Consultant to maintain a matrix, listing all agencies, permit forms,
significant regulations / requirements, issues to resolve, and submittal
meeting schedule.
M. Proposed future development of EYW, including the current and proposed
airport layout plans (ALP), and information gathered from the EYW Master
Page 2 of 16
Plan, and proposed tenant projects.
N. Existing monitoring programs for water quality, water quantity,
groundwater, and rainfall including the EPA multi sector permit, SFWMD
permits, COUNTY permits, and documents involving any underground
contamination.
O. Existing Water Quality Programs such as Airport Sweeping Program,
Airport Turf Maintenance Program, Wildlife Hazard Management Program.
P. Other reports and studies determined by the COUNTY and CONSULTANT
to be relevant during the data gathering phase (Task 1.1).
The COUNTY will make its best efforts to provide, or cause others to provide as may be the
case, as much of the above information as possible in electronic form to CONSULTANT.
The scope does not include field verification of geometry data collected in this task, other
than surveys that may be performed under Task 1.3. Consultant shall identify any critical
field verifications that appear to be warranted, including rationale. Request for Work
Authorization will be submitted by CONSULTANT if necessary.
A summary of the specific data gathered for the completion of the inventory will be provided
by CONSULTANT in tabular form at the end of this subtask and later included as part of the
appendices in the SWMP Technical Memorandum. Data and permit needs will be
summarized in Data, Permit and Monitoring Needs table.
Consultant shall identify any additional warranted information that is not listed above with
justification for such and shall submit request for Work Authorization if necessary.
CONSULTANT will use the gathered and evaluated data to prepare an existing
conditions summary comprised of the following:
A. An updated map on AUTOCAD (latest Version) of the existing stormwater
management system (SWMS) of EYW indicating inlets, storm drains,
ditches, canals, ponds, culverts, underdrains, exfiltration systems, drainage
wells and control structures based on the base maps, and any additional
mapping, either existing mapping or new mapping as required, to ensure
accurate updated map of SWMS. Consultant shall submit request for Work
Authorization if necessary for any additional work effort.
B. CONSULTANT will also define the Primary Stormwater Management
System, for model evaluations as a map layer. The minimum pipe size for
mapping will be 12-inches in diameter or equivalent. The minimum size for
modeling shall be 12 inches or greater. Modeling will include outfalls and
sufficient detail to represent the extent of major flooding problems. This
map will also include problem area layers and future projects layers.
Problem areas include water quantity aspects (flooding, ponding and
erosion), surface water quality aspects (evidence of spills, turbidity or
permit exceedances) and groundwater quality (contaminant plumes). The
scale for hard copies of the base map shall be I inch =200 feet (Reducible in
size to 11 inch by 17 inch, at I inch =500 feet).
Flooding problems and problem areas shall be determined via data review,
interviews / meetings with the COUNTY, EYW Tenants, FBOs, Service
Providers, Fire Rescue and others who may have knowledge of field
conditions. "Future project" layers to be agreed upon by the COUNTY prior
to finalizing. Stormwater problems associated with future projects are also
to be depicted in this modeling.
CONSULTANT will analyze the data on outfall control structures (if any)
operated by ENTITIES other than the Airport, to evaluate their impact on
stormwater management at EYW. The results will be summarized and
incorporated in the SWMP Technical Memorandum.
CONSULTANT will review and analyze existing and proposed regulations. This
will focus on the FAA, FDOT, COUNTY, FDEP, and SFWMD; ACOE as well as
any additional agencies that Consultant identifies as warranted. From this review,
CONSULTANT will prepare a list of permits that will have to be obtained,
including the timetable for application and data analysis/needs. This list will be
included in the Data, Pen -nits and Monitoring Needs table.
1.1.5 OBTAIN REPRESENTATIVE SOIL DATA AND PERFORM LABORAIJR
TESTING AS FOLLOWS:
A. Depending upon the existing available data, additional soil sampling / datp
may need to be obtained. If requested by the County, the CONSULTANT will
provide services to obtain this information under the Optional Additional Services
section outlined in Exhibit "B".
R�F!1111111 I ] 11111 illli I'll] � ii� I i�ii 1 � 1 � � i�� 1 F, 1
Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling performed in this and subsequent tasks will
be for the existing Primary Stormwater Management System (PSMS) as shown in
Figure 1. Items A through J (shown below) indicate the input data applicable to
the analysis of the PSMS, utilizing version 5 of the RUNOFF (hydrology) and
EXTRAN (hydraulics) blocks of the United States (US) Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Stormwater Management Model (SWMM).
A. Tributary Area - CONSULTANT will determine tributary areas at the base
scale (1" = 200').
B. Rainfall Hyteographs - CONSULTANT will develop rainfall hyetographs
for the 100-year, 72-hour; 25-year, 72-hour; 5-year, 24-hour and 2.5 inch
Z-Mam
storms based on rainfall volumes and distribution data available from
SFWMD.
C. Basin Slope - CONSULTANT will calculate an average slope for each
basin.
D. Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) - CONSULTANT will
calculate the percentage of directly connected impervious area by basin. A
maximum of six land use categories (Terminal, commercial, industrial,
pavement, water\wetland, and grass) will be utilized to develop typical
DCIAs for each basin. These DCIA values for each land use type will be
based upon representative percentages for similar areas.
E. Stage/Area/Storage - CONSULTANT will establish stage/area storad-3
relationships for applicable basins (where appreciable storage exists).
F. Soils Data - CONSULTANT will estimate soil storage and infiltration rat
for each basin based on available data from the Inventory or NRCS. Soi
will be characterized as NRCS Hydrologic Groups A, B, C and D.
G. Other Hydrologic Parameters - CONSULTANT will estimate roughne le
coefficients for other parameters, such as overland flow and initi
abstraction (surface ponding), based on available data.
H. Primary Stormwater Management System (PSMS) Schematic
CONSULTANT will develop the PSMS schematic on the base map in Ta
1.2.1A. This PSMS schematic will show general flow trends and w
provide a means of identifying model output for SWMM RUNOFF a
EXTRAN on maps at scale (1"=200'). The minimum pipe size for modeli
s'fall be 24inches.
1. Cross Sections -CONSULTANT will code cross sections for channels,
swales, and overland flow (based on survey and topographic data provided
by COUNTY).
J. Hydraulic Data - CONSULTANT will incorporate necessary hydraulic data
into the hydraulic model(s) for equivalent hydraulic representation of the
PSMS. CONSULTANT, in consultation with COUNTY, will determine
which data are necessary. CONSULTANT will review data and determine
what elevation to use at the canal outfalls, for each of the design storms.
CONSULTANT will provide a technical memorandum discussing the methodology a
making reference to the input data prepared. The input data set resulting from the model s
up will become part of the appendix tables in the final Technical Memorandum. Th
information quantifies the hydraulic and hydrologic characteristics of the study area and is
fundamental part of the overall stormwater master planning effort. In addition to the inp
data sets provided in the appendices, various components of the model set-up describ
above will be incorporated in the final Technical Memorandum in order to provide a bett
understanding of the stormwater management system and specific modifications that may
required due to future airport improvements. The stormwater models (RUNOFF al,
RTWIRIM, I I I I
CONSULTANT will review rainfall, recorded water elevation data (in and near
the airport), and high water marks for large storms occurring within the last 10
years (with recurrence frequency of once in 10 years or more, if possible).
Consultant shall list largest storms considered; provide discussion on how storm
used for calibration was selected and describe any caveats that need to be
considered when interpreting model based on this calibration.
Based on available data, CONSULTANT will select a storm with sufficient data
to be used for model calibration. CONSULTANT will simulate the rainfall event
for this storm and calibrate the model by adjusting the hydrologic (e.g., soil
storage and land cover parameters) and hydraulic (e.g., Manning' roughness
coefficient) parameters until the predicted peak water elevations reasonably match
the observed values. CONSULTANT will prepare a technical memorandum
discussing the methodology and results.
CONSULTANT will simulate the 100-year, 72-hour; 25-year, 72-hour; 5- yeam
24-hour; and 2.5-inch storms using the model parameter values obtained
calibration and produce a technical memorandum and summary tables of pe
flood stages for each design storm under present and future land use conditio
with existing hydraulics (2 scenarios).
Based on the existing flooding and design storm simulation results,
1.1 C113. 11 - elm 11
Field topographic surveys are not included in this scope and fee. If there is a need
for obtaining field topographic surveys, the CONSULTANT will perform field
surveys of physical features as necessary if the survey information is not
provided. Details of required survey services will be determined once existing
Survey data has been assimilated. The survey requirements in order to prepare the
Drainage Master3lan and Model will be current topog-,raphic survei,,, elevations of
the airfield and apron, and the areas 100 feet beyond the perimeter of the airfield
fence. All stormwater drainage structures and pipe culverts along with rim and
invert elevations will be required. Tidal water levels in the salt marsh will need to
be recorded to determine correlation with ocean tide levels. Spot elevations of
buildings and pavement locations as recommended by CONSULTANT.
A. Depending upon the existing available data, additional survey data may need
to be obtained. If requested by the County, the CONSULTANT will provide
services to obtain this information under the Optional Additional Services
section outlined in Exhibit "B".
•.:
ARTICLE B - PHASE 2
STORMWATER MASTERPLAN
AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
TASK 2.1 STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
f.l.l. Evaluation of Alternatives
CONSULTANT will evaluate and describe up to two different alternative
solution combinations. The analysis will be conducted for existing land use
(including all currently permitted projects) and for an ultimate ("buildout") land
use. The existing land use condition will encompass existing conduits, conduits
under construction or conduits under final design. Thus, CONSULTANT will
analyze a maximum of four scenarios (2 land use plans times 2 alternatives). The
analysis will include possible use of on -site detention basins. Specific detention
basin locations to be determined in consultation with Monroe County Airport
Staff.
CONSULTANT will also make an assessment of the potential for the following
stormwater management options:
A. Adjusting watershed boundaries and/or for interconnecting watersheds.
B. Exfiltrating storm water into the groundwater system (wells , exfiltration
trenches).
C. Berm airfield perimeter and pump to temporary ponding areas (considering
FAA constraints).
D. Increasing existing offsite discharges, or additional points of discharge
based on expected groundwater / tidal levels and the computed water
elevations during the design storms.
E. Other possible stormwater management options, determined during
information gathering task.
The above list of stormwater management options shall be finalized and accepted
by the County Representative, prior to proceeding with analysis.
Develop and Analyze Stonnwater Master Plan
Based on the foregoing analysis and review comments from the County,
CONSULTANT will further evaluate the two alternatives for existing and future
land use condition (i.e., 4 scenarios) including probable capital costs, operation
and maintenance costs and develop an overall plan that meets the airport's levels
of service and regulatory agency guidelines. CONSULTANT will develop a list
of "pros" and • for each alternative.
The analysis will identify opportunities to facilitate modifications of the existing
stormwater systems in a phased approach, to most efficiently address the drainage
concerns -• • FAA in their June 26, 2012, inspection letter.
CONSULTANT will prepare maps showing the location of recommended
facilities • alternative at 1=200' scale), (one alternative) prepare a summary
table of the probable capital costs of improvements, and provide a discussion of
t�.e SWMP in the recommendations section of the Technical Memorandum as
indicated below.
2.1.3 SW MP Technical Memorandum
Following review comments from the County on previous submittals (tables and
memos), CONSULTANT will develop a Technical Memorandum which will
address the following:
- Introduction
- Data and Methodology
- Results
- Alternatives
- Recommendations
- Cost Effectiveness
- Permitting Issues
- Implementation
The Technical Memorandum will provide the essential information on the above
•• in the text narrative in the style of an Executive Summary. Supplementary
information such as detailed tables, computer printouts and •. maps will be
provided in separately bound appendices in hard copy and/or digital form as
appropriate.
TASK 2.2 PERMIT APPLICATIONS
A coordinated and detailed • • Permitting • activities and
responsibilities shall •- developed.
2.2.1 Develop and Analyze Stormwater Master Plan for Future Development
CONSULTANT will prepare conceptual plans, sketches, computations, anio
develop the information necessary to prepare permit application forms in
accordance with the result • the consultation with the agencies havin�!.4
jurisdiction, in order to:
A. Prepare an airport -wide conceptual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
application. This is a joint application to SFWMD and the U.S. Army Corps
• Engineers. Non-stormwater environmental elements (such as, wetlands,
wildlife and water quality etc.) are not anticipated to be required at this time.
This •+ •• not include any field data collection • research • • such
non-stormwater related environmental information as may be required for the
non-stormwater environmental elements of the ERP. Consultant shall request
work authorization if such data or research is required.
B. Depending upon the need to obtain non-stormwater related environmental
infon-nation for the processing of the ERP, the Consultant, if requested by the
County, will provide services to obtain this information under the Optional
Additional Services section outlined in Exhibit
This scope excludes work effort involving securing the rights to offsite lakes /
ponds or discharge facilities not owned by the COUNTY. If any work related to
the securing rights to offsite lakes, ponds or discharge facilities, becomes
necessary, these work items may be added as an Additional Optional Service.
CONSULTANT plans to submit ERP surface water management applications
that are in conformance with jurisdictional agencies' standard stormwater
requirements and/or represent a compromise between competing requirements
(such as storage requirement by SFWMD versus ponding limitation by FAA).
The level of effort in this scope assumes a reasonable stance by regulatory
agencies (i.e., no new rules or special criteria or expanded geographic coverage).
Accordingly, consultant anticipates having to prepare responses to two rounds of
standard Requests for Additional Information (RAIs).
2.2.2 MEET WITH GOVERNMENT PERMITTING AGENCIES
Meet with South Florida Water Management District and Florida Department
Environmental Protection to review the water quality data, parameters a
approach. I
PHASE 3
(Future - NOT included in this proposal)
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITAPPLICATIONS
TASK 3.1 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR STORMWATER
IMPROVEMENTS
3.1.1. Preparation of Construction Documents
CONSULTANT will prepare construction documents for the County approved, recommended
stormwater improvements. A detailed scope of services will be prepared for the selected
Stormwater Improvements, from Phase I and Phase 2 of this STORMWATER
IMPROVEMENTS O. • . MASTER PLAN Task Order. The construction
documents may be issued in Phases based on allocated levels of funding available for the
stormwater improvements.
# 1 1 it iL�>sL1 i1 l
WfflDt1A= I a'1
�/
EXHIBIT B
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If requested by the County, the CONSULTANT will provide design review or
guidance services for additional services involving the stormwater master plan
• • •,a •
The detailed scope of services and compensation for this TASK will be defin
and negotiated as requested by the County. A separate Work Author zation f
Task OSI Additional Services will • executed • requested additional servic
under this Stormwater Masterplan A,reement.
CONSULTANT will provide stormwater related support services as requested
by the County or the regulatory agencies including planning studies,
photogrametry, field verification of existing facilities, environmental issues
regarding the ER-P permit, services involving securing rights to non -County
owned • lakes • ponds, design services, topographic survey, geotechnical
investigation and miscellaneous implementation and technical assistance. I
necessary CONSULTANT will perform additional field survey and data
collection to support the program. This could also include water level gages
and/or flow measurement devices. Where appropriate, CONSULTANT will
identify technical activities that might be performed by the County, if agreed
upon by both departments. These services are currently undefined but may
become necessary as the program proceeds.
The detailed scope of services and compensation for this TASK will be defin
and negotiated as requested by the County. A separate Work Authorization
Task OS2 Additional Services will be executed for these services under th
Stormwater Masterplan Agreement, as request of the County.
Page 12 of 16
Project:
LEH23�
Key West International Airport
Emergency Drainage Improvements
JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Article A: Data Collection and Modeling 768 $ 98,400
Article B: Technical Memorandum and Permitting 428 $ 53,560
ITotal Basic Services Lump Sum Fee 1,196 $ 151,960 $
SPECIAL SERVICES
Hours Fee
ITotal Special Services Lump Sum Fee 0
DBE Percentage 0.00%
9 FITA111*1411 M I I, 1:11=1;11 1[0101�M I I
N
Article A: Data Collection and Modeline
LEM=
Key West International Airport
Emergency Drainage Improvements
MTMMIW���
M)
oil, Computer Model of Existing System
Nfeetings - Internal Coordination
Meetings - Client
TOTAL HOURS
cCtt
'RATE
t
t
tt
tt
.. �
®�
t .
.:.
�
to
TOTAL PAYROLL S 96,368
S
s
Subconsultants S -
Expenses I
_I 2,032
Cost Plus Fee Total S 98,400
Task Esnensese
Rental Car (2 visit @ 565/visa)
S
130
Gas for Car Rental On -Site =
S
60
Lodging (2 visits @ 5160/visa)
S
320
Airfare (2 visits @ 5670(visit)
S
1,340
Misc
S
182
Total Expenses
S
2,032
UIALIFEL
19=
E"�
Key West International Airport
Emergency Drainage Improvements
TOTAL PAYROLL S 51,448
S
S
S
S
Subconsultarvus 5 -
Expenses _L 2,112
Cost Plus Fee Total S 53,560
Task Expgnjt,;:
Rental Car (2 visit @ S65/visit)
S
130
Gas for Car Rental On -Site =
S
60
Lodging (2 visits @ $160(visit)
S
320
Airfare (2 visits @ 57001visit)
S
1,400
Nlisc
S
202
Total Expenses
S
2,112
60
Page 16 of 16