Loading...
Item L2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 16, 2013 Division: Engineering &Public Works Bulk Item: Yes X No _ Department: Wastewater Staff Contact Person/Phone #:Wilson (453-8797) AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of Cudjoe Regional Advanced Wastewater Reclamation Facility (Treatment Plant)project changes included in FKAA Project#4051-12 Change Order 43. The result is a net change to the project of$186,580.36. ITEM BACKGROUND: This change includes an addition funds for a change to the wastewater treatment reactor ($42,038) and increased costs associated with unforeseen costs of ash removal ($355k) and credits for elimination of VFD Burn in testing ($34,240) and sales tax savings due to owner direct purchases ($178,637.64). PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend Approval TOTAL COST:$186,580.36 INDIRECT COST: Staff Time BUDGETED: Yes X No DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: N/A COST TO COUNTY: $186,580.36 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Fund 312 REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No X AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty OMB/Purchasing Risk Management DOCUMENTATION: Included X Not Required _ DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM# Revised 7/09 BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # DOE - 0 6) CONSENT: REGULAR: I] Meeting Date: September 25, 2013 Department: Engineering AGENDA TITLE: To approve Change Order 3 for the Cudjoe Regional Advanced Wastewater Reclamation Facility (AWRF) construction contract(PN4051-12)for a credit of$2,750,064 and the issuance of material Purchase Orders in the amount of$2,966,044. ITEM BACKGROUND: This change order includes several items to be considered for contract amendment. The main items are (1) additional scope/budget for specialized handling the disposal of ash containing high levels of lead and other heavy metals; and (2) tax savings via Owner Direct Purchase (ODP). The other items include (3) added floor valves, (4) added concrete for BNR tank bottom slope, and (5) removal of"burn-in" VFD test requirement. The total project change is an additional $215,980 and 90 additional days to meet substantial completion PREVIOUS RELEVANT ACTION BY FKAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Project was awarded December 2012. Change Order 1 and 2 approvals in June and July 2013, respectively. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (MOTION): Staff recommends approval of Change Order 3 for the Cudjoe Regional Advanced Wastewater Reclamation Facility(AWRF)construction contract(PN4051-12)for an amount of$2,750,064 and the issuance of Purchase Orders in the amount of$2,966,044. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: See attached Change Order documentation. Monroe County is responsible for the funding of the wastewater project. DOCUMENTATION: Included: X To-Follow: ❑ Not Required: LI COST FKAA: N/A BUDGETED: Yes No COST/OTHERS $ 215,980 (MONROE COUNTY) COST TOTAL: $ 215,980 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR APPRO �y� Reviewed by: Internal Auditor: General Counsel: Executive Director: ✓ BOARD ACTION: Approved: ❑ Tabled: ❑ Disapproved: ❑ Recommendation Revised: ❑ Comments: Date: Recording Clerk: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Monroe County, Florida September 2013 Change Order No. 3 CUDJOE REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVANCED WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY FKAA PROJECT No. 4051-12 I. General This Change Order is hereby made a part of the Contract Documents. All requirements of the original Contract Documents shall remain in full force and effect except as modified hereinafter. II. Scope of Work and Reason for Modification At the request of FKAA, the Contractor for this Project, Wharton-Smith, Inc., has agreed to provide the additional or changed work stated below: 1. Provide floor drain check valves in the influent screening to prevent backflow during maintenance (RFI #4/RFQ #5) 2. Provide BNR Basin floor slopes to improve maintenance operations (RFl #34) 3. Provide for owner direct purchase of major equipment to obtain sales tax savings 4. Delete VFD "burn-in" testing (redundant) 5. Additional costs associated with the lead contaminated ash removal. Ill. Summary of Cost Chancres 1. Original Contract Bid: $ 21,872,000 2. Total Amount of Change Orders 1 $ 91,963 3. Current Contract $ 21,963,963 4. This Change Order 3 ($ 2,750,064) 5. Revised Contract Amount $ 19,213,899 1 � l' age Cudjoe PN 4051 September 2013 Change Order#3 IV. Summary of Contract Time Changes The Contractor has requested 90 additional days of Contract Time for meeting substantial completion, associated with the ash removal (Item 5) work. Thus, the Contract Substantial Completion is now 810 calendar days. The Contract Final Completion remains 1085 calendar days. The Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority and the Contractor, Wharton-Smith, Inc., agree that the time and costs sum agreed to in this Change Order constitutes a full and complete settlement of the issues set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor accepts the terms of the Change Order as full compensation for all other costs, whether direct or indirect, whether incurred or in the future, related to the issues set forth in this Change Order. The undersigned have carefully read this Change Order and by affixing their signatures attest their full agreement with the provisions herein. Owner: Contractor: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Wharton-Smith, Inc. Kirk C. Zuelch Date Ronald Davoli Date Executive Director President Tom Walker, PE Date Manager of Engineering Board Approval Date: 21Page Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Monroe County,Florida Cudjoe Regional Wastewater Program Project: Advanced Water Reclamation Facility Project No. 4051-12 Change Order No. 3 To: Wharton-Smith,Inc. From: Joe Ivey,Program Construction Manager Date: September 25,2013 Re: Change Order(X ) Extra Work( ) Additional Work(X ) Job Description: Work described by RFI#4,RFQ#5, RFI#34,WCD#4,WCD#5 Contractor: Wharton-Smith,Inc. Amount: -$2,760,064.00 Funds Available: Itemized and explained as follows: Unit Quantity Price per Unit Total Item Amount New Items: 1 Floor Drain Check Valves LS 1 $0.00 2 BNR Floor Slopes LS 1 $42,038.00 $42,038.00 3 ODP-Removal of Equipment from W-S contract LS 1 $ (3,114,682.00) ($3,114,682.00) 4 Delete VFD"burn-in" LS 1 $ (32,420.00) ($32,420.00) 5 Contaminated Ash Removal LS 1 $ 355,000.00 $355,000.00 Total Change Order ($2,760,064.00) The Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority and the Contractor,Giannetti Contracting,Corp.,agree that the time and costs sum agreed to in this Change Order constitutes a full and complete settlement of the issues set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor accepts the terms of the Change Order as full compensation for all other costs,whether direct or indirect,whether incurred or in the future,related to the issues set forth in this Change Order. The undersigned have carefully read this Change Order and by affixing their signatures attest their full agreement with the provisions herein. hange Order provides for all costs and schedule adjustments associated with completing this work,including materials,labor,equipment,bond,insurance, overhead,extended overhead,profit,Impact,and any and all related items or associated costs included or resulting from the items listed above. Owner Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Kirk Zuelch-Executive Director Date Tom Walker-Manager of Engineering Date Joe Ivey-Construction Manager Date Contractor Wharton-Smith,Inc. Ronald Davoli,President Date Wharton-Smith, Inc. 4 CONSTRUC11ON GROUP August 2,2013 Mr. Walt Schwarz,PE CH2M Hill 6410 51h Street,Suite 2A Key West,Florida 33040 Re: Change Order Cost Proposal No.08 Rev. 00—BNR Basin Sloped Floor RFI 434 FKAA Project 44051-12 Cudjoe Key AWPtF CH2M Hill Project#458401 Dear Mr.Schwarz•, We are submitting the above referenced proposal in the amount of 42,038.00 required to provide sloped floor as directed in the BNR Basin. We propose to furnish all necessary labor, materials, tools, equipment, and supervision required for this work. Scope includes installation of approximately 100 cyds of 5000 PSI grout with fiber added to aid the grout from cracking.The grout depth ranges from 5" to 0". Sikadur 32 Hi-Mod bonding agent will covert the floor to ensure proper adhesive. Floor will be finished towel finish slopped to each drain.. We have attached a detailed Proposal Summary to further define out-scope of work. Only the items listed in the Proposal Summary are to be considered as included in our scope of work. No cost allowance has been trade for items of work not contained in the Proposal Summary,and are specifically excluded from this proposal. This Lump Sum proposal is valid for 5 calendar days. Please be advised that the work outlined in this proposal is a change to the original contractual scope of work. At 1he present time we are unable to determine the schedule impact of this changed work. Upon receipt of a written Construction Directive, activities for the altered work will be incorporated into our schedule to determine the impacts on the Well milestone date and project completion date. At this time,you are requested to issue a Construction Directive,or recommend issuance of a Change Authorization from the Authority,so we may proceed with the work identified in our Proposal Summary. If there are any questions concerning this matter,do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Wharton-Smith, Inc. Philip Mintzer Project Manager cc: Greg Schneider,WSI Attachments: COOP#08 Rev 00 Sikdur 32 Product Data Sheet File/ 12-071 /C-8A COCP No.08 3,547 SW(`orl)onate Vlar4,wvvy, 11alm City,11,34990 Phone:772G38.3-29Y4 Fax:772/283-3121 FL-CG('032[60,AI 35694-LA-52227 N -MIMIC,GA-LvCCO001333 -NC-33755*LTC.-697817 1N-62419,VA-270121581A Summary CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 08 Revision 00 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF PROPOSAL SUMMARY G'ON BTBVCTION CiRO VP # DESCRIPTION t' '.NOTES 1 Furnish all necessary labor,materials,tools,equipment and supervision required to install approx. 100 cyds of grout to 2 install sloped floor for the BNR basin as directed in RFI#34. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The duration for the additional work outlined In this proposal Is 2 calendar days. 11 The Contract Time Extension due to this Change Order is TO BE DETERMINED calendar days. 12 JIVIATERIALS _"�. � . �,� � TOTAL 13 From Page 2 $ 29,910.00 14 Tax 7.506/p $ 2,243.25` $; 32,153.25 15 Markup �0 0°�0 $ +,3,216.33 $, '. 35,368.58 Article 8.4(F)(a) 16 $ 35,368.58 17 18 LABOR ?' HRS ".. A1/G$1 R;. TOTAL 19 From Page 3 1 106.56 1$ 33.451 $ 3,564.00 20 Markup 10.0% $ 35E. 0 $ 3,920,40 Article 8.4(F)(a) 21 $ 3,920.40 22 23 ITobLs&IEQUIPMENT 'TOTAL " 24 From Page 4 $ 2,169.12 25 Tax >. 7'5O% $ 16DP8 $ 2,331.80 26 Markup 0.0% $ $ 2,331.80 Article 8.4(F)(c) 27 $ 2,331.80 28 29 jSUBc6NtRAcTs TOTAL 30 From Page 5 $ 31 $ 32 33 34 Subtotal $ 35 Markup 10.0%p $ $ Article 8.4(F)(b) 36 $ 37 38 JOTHER QTY REFERENCE„ TOTAL' 39 lExtended Overhead Days'Cost Per Day $ - $ - 40 jAdditional Insurance 0.45% M+L+T&E+S $ 41,620.78 $ 187.29 41 jAdditional Bond 0.55% M+L+T&E+S $ 41,808.07 $ 229.94 42 Subtotal,, ,$,_ 417.24 43 Markup` 0.0% $ 417',.24 $, - Article 8.4(F)(b) 44 417.24� 45 46 FINAL QUOTE TOTAL TOTAL 47 $ 42,038.00 48 49 1 Is. 42,038.0011 Product Data Sheet Edition 8.1.2011 Sikadur 32, Hi-Mod Sikadue 32 Hi-Mod High-modulus, high-strength, epoxy bonding/grouting adhesive Description Sikadur 32,Hi-Mod,is a multi-purpose,2-component,100%solids,moisture-tolerant structural epoxy adhesive. It conforms to the current ASTM C-881,Types I,II,and V,Grade-2,Class C and AASHTO M-235 / specifications. Where to Use ■ Bond fresh,plastic concrete to hardened concrete and steel. ■ Grout horizontal cracks in structural concrete and wood by gravity feed. ■ Machinery and'robotic'base-plate grout. ■ Structural adhesive for concrete,masonry,metal,wood,etc. Advantages ■ Super-strength bonding/grouting adhesive. ■ Tolerant to moisture before,during and after cure. ■ Excellent adhesion to most structural materials. y Y 1 ■ Convenient eas to-mix ratio A:B=1:1 b volume. ■ Easy-to-use for bonding/grouting applications. n Fast■ USDA-certified ial set: orrluse ain to in food imate plants. strengths. plants Coverage Bonding Adhesive-1 gal.covers approximately 80 sq.ft.on smooth surface. Base Plate Grout-1 gal.mixed with 1.5 parts oven-dried aggregate by loose volume yields approximately 420 cu.In.of grout. Anchoring grout-1 gal.yields 231 cu.in.of grout. TypIC11 Data(Material and curing conditions @ 73°F(23°C)and 50'�R.H.) .. . RESULTS MAY DIFFER BASED UPON STATISTICAL VARIATIONS DEPENDING UPON MIXING METHODS AND EQUIPMENT, TEMPERATURE,APPLICATION METHODS,TEST METHODS,ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND CURING CONDITIONS. %�rl/ 11ff1' I a Shelf Life 2 years in original,unopened containers. Storage Conditions Store dry at 40°-95°F(4°-35°C).Condition material to 65°-75°F(18°-24°C) �' � �r,��J� , �,✓�,, before using. Color Concrete gray Mixing Ratio Component'A':CompDnent'B'=1.1 by volume. Viscosity Approximately 3,000 cps. Pot Life Approximately 30 minutes.(60 gram mass).Approximately 22 minutes.(350 gram mass,8 oz.) Contact Time 40°F(4°C)":12 hrs. 73°F(23°C)":3-4.5 hrs. 90°F(32°C)":1.5-2 hrs �r/���'`✓°�;'% 'il� ��' Compressive Modulus,psi 7 day 2.1 X 101 psi(1,449 MPa) i j tilt y' % Tensile Properties(ASTM D-638) 7 day Tensile Strength 6,900 psi(48 MPa) l ii i/ ro/�i r Elongation at Break 1.9/o 14 day Modulus of Elasticity 5.4 X 105 psi(3,726 MPa) Flexural Properties(ASTM D-790) 14 day Flexural Strength(Modulus of Rupture) 7,000 psi(48.3 MPa) ' Tangent Modulus of Elasticity in Bending 6.9 X 105 psi 4,800 MPa 9 tY 9 P ( ) Shear Strength(ASTM 0-732) 14 day Shear Strength 6,200 psi(43 MPa) Water Absorption(ASTM D-570) 7 day(24 hour Immersion) 0.21% Heat Deflection Temperature(ASTM 0-648) 7 day fiber stress loading 264 psi(1.8 MPa 122°F 50°C Bond Strength(ASTM C-882): 2 day(moist cure) Plastic Concrete to Hardened Concrete 1,700 psi(11.7 MPa) Hardened Concrete to Hardened Concrete 2,000 psi(13.8 MPa) Hardened Concrete to Steel 1,900 psi 13.1 MPa P ( ) 14 day(moist cure) Plastic Concrete to Hardened Concrete 2,200 psi(15.1 MPa) Plastic Concrete to Steel 2,000 psi(13.8 MPa) Hardened Concrete to Hardened Concrete 2,000 psi(13.8 MPa) Compressive Properties(ASTM D-695) / j Compressive Strength,psi(MPa) 40°F" 4°C 73°F" 23°C 90°F" 32°C 8 hour - 140(1.0) 1,700(11.7) 16 hour - 4,800(33.1) 7,300(50.3) 3 day 5,300036.E 5173 0 0 00 377.9 10,400 71.7 Y (36.6) (77.9) ( ) 7 day 9,600(66.2) 11,800(81.4) 10,400(71.7) 14 day 11,900(82.1) 12,200(84.1) 10,400(71.7) 28 day 12,600 86.9 12,200 84.1 10,500 72.4 Y ( ) ( ) ( ) 'Material cured and tested at the temperatures Indicated. Packaging 1,2 and 4 gal.units. How to Use Surface must be clean and sound.It may be dry or damp,but free of standing water.Remove dust, fl Ili Surface Preparation laitance,grease,curing compounds,impregnations,waxes and any other contaminants. Preparation Work:Concrete-Should be cleaned and prepared to achieve a laltance and contaminant ,i free,open textured surface by blastcleaning or other equivalent mechanical means. Steel-Should be cleaned and prepared thoroughly by blastcleaning. y, Mixing Pre-mix each component.Proportion equal parts by volume of Component'A'and Component'B'Into clean pall.Mix thoroughly for 3 minutes with Sika paddle on low-speed(400-600 rpm)drill until blend is a uniform color.Mix only that quantity that can be applied within its pot life. Application To bond fresh concrete to hardened concrete-Apply by brush,roller,broom or spray.Place fresh concrete while Sikadur 32,Hi-Mod,is still tacky.If coating becomes glossy and loses tackiness,remove any llr (�/fir surface contaminants then recoat with additional Sikadur 32 Hi-Mod,and proceed. To grout basepiates-Add up to 1 1/2 parts of oven-dried aggregate to 1 part of mixed Sikadur 32,HI-Mod, by volume.Place grout under baseplate- Avoid contact with the underside of the plate. A 1/4 to 3/8 in.(6 to ���r � �� ✓rh ?�� 10 mm)space should remain between the top of the grout and the bottom of the plate. Maximum thickness of grout per lift is 1.5 in.(36 mm)If multiple lifts are needed,allow preceding layer to cool to touch before applying additional layer.The remaining 1/4 to 3/8 In.(6 to 10 mm)space should be filled with neat Sikadur 32 HI-Mod.Pour a sufficient quantity of neat epoxy to allow the level to rise slightly higher than the underside of the bearing plate. To gravity feed cracks-Pour neat material Into vee-notched crack.Continue placement until completely j j iiir ri>i% l filled.Seal underside of slab prior to filling if cracks reflect through. Limitations ■ Minimum substrate and ambient temperature 40°F(4°C). �"nl' �� ��`��✓ ■ For spray applications,consult Technical Service at 800-933-7452. ■ Use only oven-dry aggregate. ■ Material is a vapor barrier after cure. r For applications on exterior,on-grade substrates,consult Technical Services at 800-933-7452. ■ Do not apply over wet,glistening surface. ■ Not an aesthetic product. Color may alter due to variations in lighting and/or UV exposure. P Y 9 9 P Warning Component'A'-IRRITANT;SENSITIZER-Contains epoxy resin,nonyl phenol.Can cause skin / r�r f1j 11 i sensitization after prolonged or repeated contact.Eye irritant.May cause respiratory irritation.Harmful if ra ✓i ,'%�i swallowed. G Component'B'-CORROSIVE;IRRITANT,SENSITIZER-Contains amines,silica(quartz),and f ! fir/rrjn i benzylalcohol nonyl phenol.Contact with eyes or skin causes severe burns.Can cause skin sensitization after prolonged or repeated contact.SkWrespiratory/eye Irritant. Harmful If swallowed.Deliberate concentration of vapors of Component A or B for purposes of inhalation is harmful and can be fatal.Cured material,if sanded,may result in exposure to a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer. First Aid Eyes:Hold eyelids apart and flush thoroughly with water for 15 minutes.Skin:Remove contaminated �� ����,� "`✓�%ria�rrf�;✓� clothing.Wash skin thoroughly for 15 minutes with soap and water.Inhalation:Remove person to fresh air. / j✓�����/� l�j� Ingestion:Do not Induce vomiting.In all cases,contact a physician Immediately if symptoms persist. Wear late area. In absence of Clean Up dequate general and local exhaust ventilation,use ta gloves/goggles/clothing. property fillled/NIOSH respirator. Confine spill. Collect with absorbent material. P P Dispose of in accordancewith current,applicable local,state and federal regulations. Uncured material can it � be removed with solvent.Strictly follow manufacturer's warningsand instructions for use. Cured material 101, can only be removed mechanically.yri j/ j Handling&Storage Avoid direct contact with skin and eyes. Wear chemical resistant gloves/goggles/clothing. Use only with adequate ventilation. In absence of adequate general and local exhaust ventilation,use a properly filled N CISH respirator. Wash thoroughly after handing product. Launder clothing before reuse. Store In a cool ��/�� i�> �iif��'✓�„ d well ventilated area. KEEP CONTAINER TIGHTLY CLOSED-KEEP OUR OF REACH O F CHILDREN•NOT FOR INTERNAL CONSUMPTION•FOR INDUSTRIAL USE ONLY All P application and use oof Sika pl ct Corporation given i oo)d faith based oln S�e current including buce anot ld knowledge of Iismmendawhe and rpedadvice relating to the prodg g xp d9 prod uctes,st r ed stored,handled and applied under normal sndiUons In accordance with Sika's Instructions.In practice,the differences In materials,substrates,storage and handling sndi- o%,i lions,actual site conditions and other factors outside of Sika's control are such that Sika assumes no liability for the provision of such Information,advice, recommendations or instructions related to its products,nor shall any legal relationship be created by or arise from the provision of such Information,advice, recommendations or Instructions related to its products.The user of the Sika product(s)must test the produi for suitability for the Intended application and purpose before proceeding with the full application of the producl(s).Sika reserves the right to change the properties of Its products without notice. All sales of Sika product(s)are subject to Its current terms and conditions of sale which are avalleWe at wwwsikausa.com or by calling 8D0.g33-7452. Prior to each use of any Sika prod uc(,the user must always read and follow the warnings and Instructions on tile product's most c unrent Technical Data Sheet,product label and Material Safety Data Sheet willch are avalIab[a online at www.sl ka usa.co in or by calling Slka's Technical Service fj Department at 800-933-7452 Nothing contained In any Slka materials relieves the user of the obligation to read and follow the warnings and Instruction foreach Ska product assetforth In the current Technical Data Sheet,productlabel and Material Safety Data Sheet prior to product use. LIMITED free from defects and to t the technical proper ties es on thle current Technicts this al Data Sheet Ifroduct for one year usedf as directed withim date of n shelf life.on to eUserr determinestsuitabilgy of product for mended use and assumes all risks.Buyer's sole remedy shall be limited to the uy y purchase price or replacement of product exclusive of labor or cost of labor. NOOTHERWARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPUED SHALLAPPLY INCLUDING ANYWARRANTY OF MERC HANTABILITY OR FITNESS FORA PARTICULAR BLE FORTHEU EOFTHISPRODUCTI AMANNERTOINFRNGEONANYOPATENTORANYOTHERI,NTELLEC UNA PROP RTYRIGHTSHELDBYOTHERS, r -.-........ i i Visit our website at www.sikousa.com 1.80D-933-SIKA NATIONWIDE Regional Information and Sales Centers.For the location of your nearest Sika sales office,contact your regional center. Slka Corporation Sika Canada Inc. Sika Mexicana S.A.de C.V. est 201 Polito Avenue 601 Delmar Avenue Carrelera Libre Celaya Km.8.5 Lyndhurst,NJ 07071 Pointe Claire Fracc.Industrial Balvanera V Fax:201-93 52 6225 Phone:514-697-610 C P Bi Queretaro g 0 rsroy,�usas�cxw,. mom, Fax:514-694-2792 Phone:52 442 2385800 Wes, Fax:e:442 22 Sika and Sikadur are registered trade- marks.Printed in Canada. Wharton-Smith r 4t CONSTRIJUVION GROUP June 28,2013 Mr.Walt Schwartz CH2M Hill 6410 5th Street, Suite 2A Key West,Florida 33040 Re: Owner Direct Purchase Items FKAA Projcct#4051-12 Cudjoc Key AWRF CH2M Hill Project#458401 Dear Mr. Schwarz; In response to CH2M Hill's Correspondence dated June 19, 2013 requesting WSI to begin the process of ODP we offer the following in reply. Attached to this letter you will find an itemized breakdown of the amounts proposed for your approval. Please review the breakdown and advise if the amounts are acceptable. We recommend a meting for this Tuesday,July 2,2013 to discuss the proper procedure for issuing PO from the Owner to our vendors. Please advise if we can meet after our meeting with Keys Energy. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me at my office or cell phone. Respectfully, Wharlon-Smith, Inc. Philip Mintzer Project Manager cc: Tom Walker, FKAA Don Hubbs,FKAA Joe Ivey,FKAA Andrew Smyth,CH2M HILL Asif Shaikh,WSI,Project Executive Attaclunents: ODP Breakdown Project File: 12-071 C-IOA 35,17 MV Corporate Parkway-, Patin City,FL 34990 Phone:772.t783-2944 Fax:77V283-3121 IT V-G 00,2669�A4. 684,�LA-?2327�MS-18212NI GA-GCCO 00I 333 NC --3055,SC-G97817-TN-624 19^VA-2705121594 A (D N O O O d' O O V• O tD O O Lf1 00 O O tD 13 G1�" p.i N IN w N m ko M m w V = L I� t0 O t0 O tD N m tD 3 !C Ln N -4 to t0 U) O tD V N N 00 00 m V- V O +--� N N .-� 00 N N G M O O O O O O O O O ; K CD000 CD CD CD CD Q u J O N O O 00 V' 0o 0 d � � �tOpp t0 O O to CO O l0 t0 fC C V O OLDN kD N I M (A > V) C Ln tD Ol .-i .-i M O tD O N tD V- O '�r r14 00 tfl, V- -4 M -4 V- N fC x (A H O O O OO O O O O O V O "" V- y O OOOOOOO O OtDO tD C O DOOM V OO V' OCD ID O CD V- tD CD tD V" o re) O "'�' M cr - 00 O - Ln tD V' t. tD 00 00 O 00 O -4 00 M M (D t0 tD N N Q +--i tD N ,-I 00 N N CF) 01 , i ,-i d AA N N , d U- {A O O a = � O .. >. G. O YLr LL LU i + E N LL � O p ui �+ v `�- O p = C u E w 3 0 0 v3 to w � 0 5 0W o O w- cr N U cr c w " cr C. ES > C ~ '2 C LL v Z) fu O> aNJ(0 -a (A c25 U 41 LL c � Vii � Mtn M — E v LL 0 N c U c c U aj LL Y 2 c = L o � E � 8 p au) oo � EL ( `° ) ° au sy � a {! a � � 0 d 3 N 3 `L� o4-1 m E c u �o cn c -N L N p p V aaii Q m •L �J a O Cn � af6W > a � Q Wharton-Smith, Inc. 4 CONSTRUC'TION GROL)P' August 16,2013 Mr. Walt Schwarz,PE CH2M Hill 6410 51h Street, Suite 2A Key West,Florida 33040 Re: Change Order Cost Proposal No. 11 Rev.00—VFD Burn-In Testing FKAA Project 44051-12 Cudjoe Key AWRF CH2M Hill Project fl458401 Dear Mr. Schwarz; Per response comment No. 5 of submittal 16150-001 we are submitting the above referenced proposal for the amount of $(34,240.00)credit to waive the Bum-In Testing requirement of the VFDs. In lieu of the Burn-In Test, SQ D will perform their standard test on each AFD and VSGEnviromation will provide an additional six(6)month warranty for each AFD they or SQ D commissions. We have attached a detailed Proposal Summary to further define the scope of this credit. Only the items listed in the Proposal Summary are to be considered as included in our scope of work. No cost allowance has been made for items of work not contained in the Proposal Summary, and are specifically excluded from this proposal. This Lump Sum proposal is valid for 5 calendar days. Please be advised that the work outlined in this proposal is a change to the original contractual scope of work. At the present time we are unable to determine the schedule impact of this changed work. Upon receipt of a written Construction Directive, activities for the altered work will be incorporated into our schedule to determure the impacts on the Well milestone date and project completion date. At this time,you are requested to issue a Construction Directive,or recommend issuance of a Change Authorization from the Authority,so we may proceed with the work identified in our Proposal Summary. If there are any questions concerning this matter,do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Wharton-Smith,Inc. Philip Mintzer Project Manager cc: Grcg Schneider,WSI Attachments: COCP No. I I VSGENVIRONMATION Proposal Dated 8-15-13 File/ 12-071/C-8A COCP No. 11 3547 S'1;'Corpo �'au P ark% aay,11dm City,FL 34990 Phone: 77?i283-2944 Fax:772/283-3121 FL-CG Co32c,69.AL-45681-LA-52227- NIS-18232W,GA-GCC0 001333 v NC-38755�SC-G97817 TN-o_11'19�VA-270512158+1A Summary CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO, 11 Revision00 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF PROPOSAL SUMMARY # DESCRIPTION NO.TES., . 1 This proposal summary is being submitted to delete the AFD burn in factory testing per specification 16150 Part 2-.01.In 2 lieu of this requirement,Square D will provide their standard testing of each AFD and provide an additional 6 month 3 warranty for each AFD commissioned by Square D and VSGEnvironmation. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The duration for the additional work outlined in this proposal is 0 calendar days. 11 The Contract Time Extension due to this Change Order is TO BE DETERMINED calendar days. 12 MATERIALS TOTAL 13 From Page 2 $ - 14 Tax 7.50%, $ $' 15 Markup 0.0%` $ $ Article 8.4(F)(a) 17 18 JLABoR, ` HRS AVG$1HR TOTAL 19 From Page 3 0 #DiV/oi $ - 20 Markup 0:0°/a ,$ - :$ - :' Article 8.4(F)(a) 21 $ 22 23 TOOLS&_�QVIPMENT TOTAL 24 From Page 4 Is - 25 Tax 7.50%% $ $i, - 26 Markup 0.0016 $ $ - Article 8.4(F)(c) 27 $ - 28 29 SUBCONTRACTS TOTAL 30 From Page 5 $ (33,900.00) 31 $ 32 33 34 Subtotal $ (33,900.00) 35 Markup 0.0% $ - $ (33,900.00) Article 8.4(F)(b) 36 $ (33,900.00) 37 38 OTHER CITY REFERENCE TOTAL 39 Extended Overhead Days"Cost Per Day $ - $ 40 Additional Insurance 0.45% M+L+T&E+S $ (33,900.00) $ (152.55) 41 Additional Bond 0.55% M+L+T&E+S $ (34,052.55) $ (187.29) 42 Subtotal $ (339.84) 43 Markup 0.0% $ (339.84) $ - Article 8.4(F)(b) 44 $ (339,84) 45 46 FINAL QUOTE TOTAL. TOTAL 47 $ (34,240.00) 18 $ 3.4 240.00 r VSGENVIROMATION` 7 F L{ F A n n M P A 14 Y August 15,2013 1000 UNIVERSITY AVENUE Contract 121846 SUITE 800 ROCHESTER,NEW YORK 14607 To: Mr.Pablo Rodriguez 585.244.0450 :T Florida Bearings 585.754.0982 :F General Manager Sales 3164 N Miami Ave. Miami,FL 33127 Direct:(305)573-8424 Fax: (305)573-7366 Subject: Cudjoe Key Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant Adjustable Frequency Drive Value Engineering Pablo, In response to the engineer comments for the Adjustable Frequency Drive (AFD) dated 7/24/13, we are providing this as our official response to line item #5 referencing section 16150-2-6.01 Factory Testing. We will provide responses to the balance of the comments under separate cover. Speeilicotion Section)<6150-Adjustable Frequency, rives(AFD I ° Value Engineering Opportunity o S ccihcation Re uirelrient VE Res nse and Savings In p q P 16150-2-6.01-Factory Testing:After the drive system has been assembled at the manufactures facility.It shall be tested for at least 24 hours before it is shipped. The complete drive system, In lieu of this requirement. SQ D will provide their including all peripherals,shall be factory tested standard testing of each AFD. under.simulated operating condition,including normal operating sequences and fault conditions. 1 Contact closure inputs and simulated driven- We are offering a credit of$33,900.00 to waive the outputs shall be connected to the system inputs/ `Burn In Testing". Also,we will provide,at no output modules additional cost,an additional 6 months of warranty for each AFD that we or SQ D commission. A test report summary indicating satisfactory final testing results shall be submitted to engineer before shipment of the equipment Please forward this Value Engineering offering to the contractor for review and evaluation per engineers review comments. Please let me know of you need additional information or need clarification. Respectfully, Curt McEntee The information contained within this document is to be considered confidential and proprietary. It shall not be distributed or communicated to other individuals or parties except those directly involved with Zeller Corporation and its affiliates on this particular application. Under no conditions shall this document or the information contained within be conununicated to competitors of Zeller Corporation and its affiliates. MEMORANDUM TO: FKAA Board of Directors VIA: Kirk Zuelch, Executive Director FROM:Tom Walker, Manager of Engineering DATE: August 30, 2013 RE: Cudjoe AWRF Differing Site Conditions—Ash Removal The site for the Cudjoe Regional Advance Wastewater Reclamation Facility (AWRF) is located at Monroe County's closed landfill on north Cudjoe Key. The County chose this site location for the regional treatment plant. The contract documents required Wharton-Smith (Contractor) to remove cemented ash and plastic liner system prior to constructing the new AWRF. The contract required these materials to be disposed of at a Class I Landfill. In March 2013, the Contractor notified FKAA staff of the need to test the ash for heavy metals, pursuant to requirements of the Medley Class I Landfill in Dade County. The FDEP permit stipulates the threshold concentrations of certain constituents allowed in the landfill. The results of the testing demonstrated that the ash had high concentrations of lead. The concentrations were not high enough to classify the ash as hazardous waste, and thereby the ash was allowed to be disposed of at the Medley Class I Landfill. Unfortunately, the concentrations were high enough to trigger OSHA regulations that require special handling (e.g. air monitoring, blood work, certified lead removal contracting, protective devices, and additional water to minimize aerosol drift). Neither the contract documents nor the closed landfill permits contained any heavy metal test information or any specifics regarding potential contaminated material to be handled. The FKAA met with the Contractor on several occasions to discuss both the means and methods of handling the ash and the specifics of dealing with the additional scope and budget for this work. The FKAA agreed to reimburse the direct costs for specialty contractors to provide the additional, but not any of the Contractor's own labor or expenses which he would have most likely incurred in the required contracted work. In the attached breakout from Wharton-Smith, only items presented under the category "Subcontracts" (page 5) were considered for reimbursement. 1 � The ash which was removed had a higher density, weight and volume than anticipated. The Contractor shows of Attachment B that he hauled and disposed of 8,787 tons of ash and liner material from the site. Weight and haul tickets from Waste Management have been provided for back-up. FKAA believes that the Contractor underestimated the volume by a factor of roughly 20%. This difference of 20% is the volume change between in-situ material and material that has been excavated and placed into trucks for hauling (AKA fluff factor). As a result, FKAA offered to pay only 80% of this portion of the additional cost for handling these materials. Other costs incurred and requested by the Contractor under this differing site condition will not be considered. The Contractor incurred other costs which we believe were included in the contract work. It was the Contractor's responsibility to account for these costs in his bid for the project. Summary of cost reimbursement recommended for inclusion in Change Order 3: 1. Cost for Exceletec (specialty contractor), ash handling $142,809 2. Cost for Prejob Engineering ( specialty contractor), lead std consulting 8,400 3. Portion of cost for handling/disposing added volume/weight of ash 203,791 $355,000 2 � V h -11 I July 26, 2013 Mr.Walt Schwarz, PE CH2M Hill 6410 5th Street, Suite 2A Key West, Florida 33040 Re: COCP 01 — Rev 03 Ash Reconciliation FKAA Project#4051-12 Cudjoe Key AWRF CH2M Hill Project#458401 Dear Mr. Schwarz; Thank you for meeting with us on July 18, 2013. In response to the meeting's outcome, attached to this letter, you shall find our cost proposal COCP #01 Rev 03 for the removal of heavy metal ash and additional unforeseen tonnage of ash. We have also included eleven Exhibits as supporting documentation. Wharton-Smith's position has been the heavy metal laden ash, though acceptable to be hauled to a Class I landfill, required special handling in accordance to OSHA 1926 standards. The contract documents do require we remove the ash materials and dispose of at a Class I landfill, however the documents fail to disclose the hazardous heavy metals. Additionally, towards the end of the special handling and disposal of the ash, the actual tonnage of ash began to exceed the calculated amounts as indicated on sheet C-2. As a result, you will also find supporting documentation for additional cost associated with the additional ash tonnage. Exhibits with Description Exhibit 1 —Ash Calculations Describes the method used by WSI to calculate the tonnage of Ash. Using Drawing C-2 an approximate volume can be found by taking the average elevation from the top of the liner to the top of the ash and multiplying by the square footage indicated on sheet C-3. A compaction test report is also included to convert the volume estimated into tonnage as removal rates are charged by the ton. Exhibit 2— Post Removal Survey Includes two surveys from WSI and Compass Point Survey. The surveys indicate the actual elevations of the limestone once the liner had been removed. These surveys are included to support any found variations in the thickness of the ash and may assist in reasoning behind large discrepancies. Exhibit 3- Exceletech Subcontract Agreement Includes all Exceletech subcontract agreement. Exceletech recognized for working with hazardous materials, and therefore, following the discovery of heavy metals, were responsible to remove ash and liner from the site. Exhibit 4— Excelectech's Payment Applications Includes all Exceletech invoices. Exhibit 5—Ash Removal Logs Provides the ash log completed by WSI. The log indicates the Manifest number, profile number, weights of the trucks, number of trucks, and a comparison of the weights between Cudjoe Key Transfer Station and Medley Landfill. 3537 SNV C'oiporotc Parkway, PaIm 0(1v..F1,34990*17hoiw:772/283-29.1-1 - Uw,:772i253-3121 1A -(YI(t lli,69��� Ai,- r .):a1 M I .ti 'W??17 it-1S- I.''3'%9('-GA-CiC'Cf7001;33 N(' w-Ci973lY"'`1 N ,(.,b#,a"VA 2171)",t?1',,.�.,:A Exhibit 6-Waste Management Subcontract Agreement Includes the subcontract agreement with Waste Management. Exhibit 7 -Waste Management Invoices Contains the invoices provided by Waste Management and weights of trucks that were taken at the destination by WM, and all charges made by WM. The weight tickets that were taken at this location are also provided with their respective invoices. These tickets contain information pertaining to the tonnage, the ID of contents, and the manifest number. The manifest number is the most accurate way to coordinate between the transfer station weight tickets and the Medley landfill weight tickets. Exhibit 8-Timeline of Events and P6 Schedules Contains a time line of events and three CPM. The 1st CPM indicates the number of days submitted to CH2M Hill in February, 2013. The 2nd CPM indicates the actual completion date. This was provided at the July 16, 2013 progress meeting. The 3rd CPM indicates the time line of events. A narrative describing delays, showing original schedule with delay impacts, and an updated schedule are included in this exhibit. Exhibit 9-Schedule of Values Includes the approved schedule of values indicating the cost for the removal of the as materials. Exhibit 10—All Previous Correspondences Provides correspondence between WSI, CH21V1 Hill, and FKAA. This was provided as a reference and as supporting information for any future conversations. Exhibit 11 —Cudioe Key Transfer Station Weight Tickets and Manifest Contains all tickets and manifests. Tickets portray weights that were taken at the origin by WM. The profile number on the manifests is the identification of the contents being hauled as assigned by WSI. The total cost of the entire operation for the removal of the ash and liner is $953,644.00. Of this amount, WSI will payout $455,009.00. We are requesting an additional $498,635.00 to cover the expenses of the special handling of the heavy metal laden ash and the additional tonnage cost from Waste Management. Our Schedule of Values displayed, in Exhibit 9, indicates a total value of $160,200.00 for the removal and disposal of the tire chips, ash and liner. WSI thanks the FKAA and CH2M Hill for reviewing the matter in a fair manner, we welcome the opportunity to collectively review the above documents in order to reconcile the outstanding matter. Time is of essence and we request a Change Order Directive for the amount of$498,635.00 to be issued upon review the proposal. Please advise of any further comments you may have regarding this matter. Respectfully, Wharton-Smith, Inc. Philip Mintzer Project Manager cc: Asif Shaikh, Project Executive, WSI 3-47 SW Cot poste P,wk,waN%Patin City,FL 34990 Phone:772i283-29-1 1 - t".rs:772/283-3121 Fl,•('0('0126(")-1\).- 4"4 -J m 1 A m'� 7 IS- tt 2 3YOC GA-GC('0 001333 NU- 1,5C-C 1481% 1'1_h..4:4 )I VA-2705121 iB-=tA Summary f wNhwip, CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 1 Revision l,3 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF �o �qj,tq T&M SUMMARY # DESCRIPTION NOTES 1 q'aNirni;Vr,,O M„ iAi at to newn r� o-a _ r � ._:�; � a....... ¢arA°rt�i��pi7�^I�rFaO 9r arrl 2 uPu ti'i4 irng irr. rrr Flru aRariL {4 u o:Inrtiv iri�,�if g (atrthf aB �,4�eAtlr 1, tat,�rrBV-,v �� .d, a..kti.i,h�, �.k 1�., ,a_,4ia.G��:�l ��, 4r%.44�1.4r Pr .n ..1;� 4 Crra, tr,,T 6rlSt a Crai rta,„+:Bari. �au uddl Aap,¢8n(en[ IG 1,Lr poi f,t'f,u t 9 ,ro.,S Bnq µ 11111(0)IUL) a i 5,13 5 Aq,fi,o J fob� w",'4 4 t'•w M G �Bm haw,., ad(,,ied 6 thrqm[t9 rye 7 diti!,i,a Y,t� ex ..., 0vrr, B�,iiei;r,. of I�r,^si�.rr,�r�IB r ,ai,.t,.Y�I,:r'a.iG.i��;4 8 „. ,,,.. „ .,,.� ....�vm�..........__, 9 10 The duration for the additional work outlined In this proposal is 114 calendar days. � � 11 The Contract Time Extension due to this ,j9,Iua I t!,tir�r is _B r a BE ID, q ,II, calendar days. 121 JIVIATERIALS/LODGING TOTAL __ 13 From Page 2 $ 18,214.18 14 Tax O.tar.N% $ .... - $ 18,214.18 15 Markup Itt.at",t, $ 1,821.42 $ 20,035.60r�,rr 16 $ 20,035.60 17 18 ILABOR HRS AVG$/HR I TOTAL 19 From Page 3 $ 21,37).00 20 Markup 10`r $ 2,137.00 $ 23,507.00 21 $ 23,507.00 .. .. _, ,. 22 23 TOOLS&EQUIPMENT TOTAL_ 24 From Page 4 � 7,218.26 �....�.._....� 25 Tax t'd 00"X'.'a $ $ 7,218.26 26 Markup 0.IY"fI $ $ 7,218.26 P,10 f � 27 $ 7,218.26 28 29 SUBCONTRACTS TOTAL 30 From Page b $ 4Q2,6538 tx4 31 32 _... .... . ..... ........ ..............._ _..._... . 33 34 ESublolpal 402,658.84 35 Itt.O�t 1+ 40 265 884 442,924.73 36 4 ,2,824.73 37 38 OTHER REFERENCE TOTAL. 39 Extended Overhead Days"Cost Per Day Is , . .. ...,� � 40 Additional Insurance 0.45% M+L + T&E+S I, $ 493,685.59 93 685 59 $ 2,221.59 41 Additional Bond 0.55% M+L+T&E+S_._._.. $_495,907.17 $ 2,727 49 � � 42 Subtotal $ 4,949.07 43 Markup ik C4n $ 4,949.07 $ 45 _. .........�_ ..._..w..,...... �� rvrv. ry 46 FINAL QUOTE TOTAL TOTAL 47 $ 498,635.00 L48 49 WW $ 498,635.00 PG 2 Materials 1 „ µ CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 1 Revision 03 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF MATERIAL ESTIMATE # MATERIALS INV QTY UNIT UNIT RATE TOTAL NOTES .,, „� �. . .,., _. .. .. .. . .. ,. .. ..... �n...�. 1 LODGING: $ 2 Credits:Task#SW1020 10 Working Days 3 Project Superintendent,$2,400.00 Month _ - -10 1/2 days -� - 54.55 $ � (545.50) 4 Assistant Superintendent,$1.800.00 Month MMMM -10 1/2 days $ 40.91 $ (409.10) .M..., 5 1 IProject Manager,$1,250.00 Month -10 1/2 days $ 28.41 $ (284.10) o..,.,.o. o. 6 1 $ 7 Project Superintendent 45 1/2 days $ 55.55 $ 2,499.75 8 Assitent Superintendent 45 1/2 days $ 40.91 $ 1,840.95 9 Project Manager: 45 1/2 days $ 28.41 $ 1,278.45 10 2 da s $ 226.00 Sea Dell Motel:4/14/13-4/15/-13, Steve Green y 11 Sea OrcaD 5/61. sitas otei: - __. ,.ro� w....a...._ _-.._.4 � a. ._-....__.... ._. 13-5/9/2013,Gilbert $ 445.52 days 12 Sea Dell Motel:5/12/13-5/16/2013,Gilbert 5 days $ 556.90 Orcasitas y 13 Sea Dell Motel:5/19/13-5/23/ ,GGil — ------- ,---------- ��_,— 2013, ilbert 4 days $ 500.65 Orcasitas 14 $ ___ 15 $ 17 Key West Urgent Care,Blood Work 11 ea $ 1,070.00 $ 1 1,770. 00 19 Airfare,Steve Green 1 $ 202.00 $ 202.00 g 20 Car Rental,Avis Steve Green 1 Is $ 132 66 $ 132.66 22 $ 23 24 $ 25 V"lt+Tna,a: 26 (-,'mdV to ond are on a NaHd'ays. 27 w°iGK.tp��..F.�uaf'A ks S2. 00.00 rmmbr .$2'��,4100.5t:) 22 aiaye," 109.09 p: r vlay 5 405 U0 -2 s 1.^.'a p e,. c1&a'yr 28 As.&,mr�.apa�.�y�a yap, is 1 GbiltlO y pn+" ou'. illt.,11 Moo-00 ?2 du n 1i11.32 per day ,,,:1;l32 4"=„40 fk E p:eir cfi-v,P 29 sup'Ws s apat G2 0.0rr par t'aG:nffi. 10,2bik 00. 22 dap,,, i4i ro t pti,r rl yy S50 8 " 2 $28,41 per d9,,i v 31 $ 32 $ 33 $ - 34 $ 35 $ 36 37 38 MATERIAL SUBTOTAL TOTAL 39 $ 18,214.18 40 $ 18,214.18 PG 3 Labor CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 1 Revision01 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF u�riv�r�ur✓o1f'(DI't�''��b LABOR ESTIMATE # LABOR HRS RATE COST NOTES ST OT ST JOT ST OT TOTAL 1 Superintendent •10 $ 85.00 $ 127.50 $ (850.00) $ $ (850.00) 2 Asst.Superintendent i0 $ 58.00 $ 87.00 $ (580.00) $ $ (580.00) 3 Operator,Excavator t0 $ 40,00 $ 60.00 $ (400.00) $ $ (400.00) 4 Operator, Loader •'E $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ (400.00) $ $ (400.00) 5 Laborer . I $ 30.00 $ 45.00 $ (300.00) $ $ (300.00) 6 Laborer 10, $ 30.00 $ 45.00 $ (300.00) $ $ (300.00) 7 Project Manager i1' $ 110.00 $ 165,00 $ (1,100.00) $ $ (1,100.00) 8 Project Engineer .10 $ 65.00 $ 97.50 $ (650.00) $ - $ (650.00) 9 $ $ $ 10 Superintendent 1`a $ 85.00 $ 127.50 $ 3,825.00 $ $ 3,825.00 __.n_.. ....-__ ........... 11 Asst.Superintendent 415 $ 58.00 $ 87.00 $ 2,610.00 $ $ 2,610.00 12 Project Manager 45 $ 110.00 $ 165.00 $ - 4,950.00 � $ -4,950 00 - �.- 13 Project Engineer 45 $ 65.00 $ 97.50 $ 2,925.00 $ $ 2,925.00 14 Safety Director $ - $ $ - 15 4115113-4/16/13 16, $ 110.00 $ 165.00 $ 1,760.00 $ $ 1,760.00 16 Safety Coordinator $ - $ $ - 17 5/5/13-5/11/13 40 $ 95.00 $ 142.50 $ 3,800.00 $ $ 3,800.00 18 5/12/13-5/18/13 '16 $ 95.00 $ 142.50 $ 3,800.00 $ $ 3,800.00 19 5/19/13-5/25/13 24 $ 95.00 $ 142.50 $ 2,280.00 $ $ 2,280.00 20 $ - $ $ - 21 $ $ $ 22 h'1w grl,sa.: f 23 C.rrldgs nni,'l l',,"A Nu r nr b,o,. ,..N un Pwsl1 dzlys 011i91aro�iiYPto"'mio M vows 10 ws,iirleir41,1 01�y 1oi ,,,sh. 24 xwas in ..,pljflll g time. 25 $ $ $ 26 $ $ $ 27 $ $ $ 28 $ $ $ 29 $ 30 $ $ _ $ .... w__ _. .. ..... 31 220.0 o.0 $ 21370.00 s 32 220.0 $ 21,370.00 33 34 ADJUSTMENTS % HRS RATE/HR TOTAL 35 Material Handfing... _.................. 7..0 n 0% 0 $ 30.00 $ - 36 Testing&Cleaning 2.5% 0 $ 30.00 $ 37 Warranty&Punchlist 1.5% 0 $ 35.00 $ 38 0 $ 39 40 PROJECT MANAGEMENT HRS RATE/HR TOTAL 41 Project Manager 0 110.010 $ 42 Asst.Project Manager s rk'i c0 $ 43 Project Engineer Cp $ Pas 00 $ 44 0.0 1 $ - 45 46 LABOR SUBTOTAL HRS AVG$/HR I TOTAL 47 Manhours - nDvrof 1$ 21,370.00 48 220.0 49 _ _ $ 21,370.00 50 PG 4 Equipment 4' i CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 1 Revision t)-n FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF �t�iPlmw ��h r�m�lTr rmu� . EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE ,,.mraan uarn,mnm wwui°w µm uw # ITOOLS DESCRIPTION REF RATE TOTAL 1 Small Tools 4%Labor Cost $ 4% $ - 00/Labor Hr $ 1.Consumables $1 00 $ 3 �..�.�. S - 5 6 EQUIPIWFENT DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT RATE TOTAL L Wee _ $ 138 90 7 Pickup Truck Superintendent t � Week _ (138.90) 8 Pickup Truck Asst Superintendent 1 3 Week $ 125.37 $ (125.3 )) _._ ... W.. _W.. Project Manager Auto l G:r Week $ 144.49 $ (144.49) .. , Pickup Truck Superintendent 4.!' Week $ 138.90 $ 625.05 p ._.�-�. .�..—u. .._._._Week.,,,,, � 125.37 $ _ ._.5.�.._. Picku Truck Asst Superintendent t.~ _ _64.17 [14 Project Manager Auto %y Week $ 144.49 $ ...._.650.21 10 __. _� .. _.. _. .. ri. ,.. .. .... $ ....�...._.... $ $ 1,430.66 RENTALS DESCRIPTION Q1Y UNIT RATE FTOTA Welder Day $ 74.80 17 Trencher Day $ 245.00 18 Loader °.C� d Weeks $ 1,026.38 2.76)P�nr t +ti19 Excavator x 1IWeeks 1,910.26 , 0.52)t1��rkl�,g 4v.urt l 20 Loader 777 Month $ 4,105.62 $ 10,263.80, 21 Concrete Pump Day $ 960.00 $ - 22 Excavator Month $ 4,300.00? $ - 23 150 Ton Crane Day $ 3,600.00 $ - 24 Core Drill Day $ 85.00 $ - 25 $ 4,390.52 26 . . 27 FUEL DESCRIPTION Rate REF TOTAL 28 Equipment Fuel 12%Fueled Equipment Cost 249% $ 5,821.18 $� ..,..............., ,.M.... .._._._. .-... 1,397.08 29 $ 1,397.08 30 31 32 EQ7LEE-NT SUEITOTAI. 7i3 OTAL 33 7,21L .2_ 34 35 7,218.26 PG 5 Subcontract "III CHANGE ORDER COST PROPOSAL NO. 1 Revision03 FKAA CUDJOE KEY AWRF VVI AIC ak"Fill t.hw;' SUBCONTRACT ESTIMATE # SUBCONTRACTOR SCOPE INV TOTAL NOTES .� ,�. �.... _ 2 _oar ..i k3 r,. 1 ir»� �_ESl kO'I I.?.,. ,..,ir 1 'A' 3 m._ 4 ors.„, ,,,. ,� fi'i ., �.�i7 �M�I7d1 r„ w r� '77 _ ''�d',� ,2d,>orro ur.,r,r¢�K � a d iGi�°s� a-�„u��•a � �d.Yd�1r P r�"a P )J 009,"PGA) a.rs I i1 f... 10 12 13 14 15 d ti;�•t l ,;,, n, ._,_.. . . W_ _.�.._ 16 �,e31 i ',��1{tik� u;7ndiq brr�iaaffi4:7 � �70r'2 � f ,i ..�7 L� 4 r Km 39,5r 18 �o_„�t P000,l G,�on,, ,`(1�11 psi ' ,(}r raid �� r,156N.4�B io- 21, ..._. v., _., 22 _ .....m. 24 25 26 � 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 _........._. _,,.._w_,,..� __ .. a.w m. .m�...� ..��_ �.._........... _. . .,,v ,m _�_�m.�.......�_ ... 39 40 SUBCONTRACT SUBTOTAL TOTAL 41 Is 402,658.84 42 $ 402,658.84 ATTACHMENT"A" Wharton-Smith, Inc. CONSTRUCTION GROUP Subcontractor:Exceletech Subcontract Analysis FKAA Cudjoe Key AWRF 12-071 Quantities Total Subcontract Descriptions Units"T uom Unit Price Price Excelectech's Payment App.#1 6/6/13-6/17113: $ - Operator 1 87.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 5,425.00 Operator 2 80.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 4,991.00 Laborer 1 87.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 4,637.50 Laborer 2 80.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 4,266.50 Perdiems,$30.00 per man,12 days,4 men 48 ea $ 30.00 $ 1,440.00 Lodging 1 Is $ 1,016.11 $ 1,016.11 Safety Links: $ - Site Safely Plan 1 Is $ 600.00 $ 600.00 Fit Testing,Respirators 6 ea $ 30.00 $ 180.00 Travel to Keys 5/6/13 6 ea $ 45.00 $ 270.00 Tolls 5/6/13 1 Is $ 16.60 $ 16.60 Onsile Safely Assilance 1 dys $ 11000.00 $ 1,000.00 OnsileSampling 1 dys $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Overnight Shipping to Lab 1 Is $ 105.00 $ 105.00 Travel to Keys 5/10/13 6 ea $ 45.00 $ 270.00 Tolls 5/10/13 1 is $ 16.60 $ 16.60 Car Rental 1 Is $ 120.73 $ 120.73 Fuel 1 is $ 122.08 $ 122.08 Hotel 1 ea $ 388.14 $ 388.14 Food 1 Is $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Shipping for sampling pumps 1 Is $ 113.73 $ 113.73 Lab Fees 1 Is $ 3,202.00 $ 3,202.00 Exceletech Mark-up 1 Is $ 760.49 $ 760.49 Total this Application: $ 30,141.48 Excelectech's Payment App.#2 6/18/13-6130/13: $ - Operator 1 75.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 4,681.00 Operator 2 70.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 4,371.00 Laborer 1 75.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 4,001.50 Laborer 2 70.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 3,736.50 Perdlems,$30.00 per man,9 days,4 men 36 dys $ 30.00 $ 1,080.00 Lodging 1 Is $ 2,737.35 $ 2,737.35 Mobilization 1 Is $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Misc.Tools 1 Is $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Safety Links: $ - Onsite Sampling 5-13-13 1 dys $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Onsile Sampling 5-13-14 1 dys $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Report 1 Is $ 600.00 $ 600.00 Shipping for sampling pumps 1 Is $ 109.00 $ 109.00 Lab Fees:12 Samples 12 ea $ 170.00 $ 2.040.00 Lab Fees 2nd Day Sampling 1 Is $ 2,040.00 $ 2,040.00 Shipping Fee for Media 1 Is $ 142.00 $ 142.00 Exceletech Mark-up 1 Is $ 693.19 $ 693.19 Total this Application: $ 31,731.64 **Safety Links'invoice Is over by$0.88** ENVIRONEERING, INC. Involl0e 1735 EMERSON STREET,SUI'CE 3 DATE INVOICE# JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 ENVIRONEERINGINC a GMAIL.COM 5/13/13 141.95 BILL TO SHIP TO Wharton-Smitb, Inc. Wharton-Smith,Inc. Mr. Philip Mintzer,Project Manager Mr.Philip Mintzer,Project Manager 3547 SW Corporate Parkway 3547 SW Corporate Parkway Palm City,FL 34990 Palm City, FL 34990 Our Job# P.O. NO, TERMS 4744-Landfill Ash Job; Cudjoe Key, FL Net 30 QTY DESCRIPTION RATE AMOUNT 1 LEAD CONSULTING—CUDJOE KEY ASH REMOVAL PROJECT 8,400.00 8,400.00 JON 9 4744 d Thank you for your business! o 904.665.0100 Sales Tax (7.0 fo) $OAO 904.665.0101 FAX 904.612.1456 MOBILE-Tim Rudolph Total $8,400.00 NVI ONEERING, INC. G Cl DJOE KEY ASH REMOVAL PROJECT 4744 ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS QUANTITY PRICE L I'• Senior Field Technition $50.00 /HOUR Professional Engineer $100.00 /HOUR 32.50 $3,250.00 1 MILEAGE $0.75 /MII,..E 1,000 $750.00 2 SUBTOTAL $4,000.00 A TCLP TESTING OF ASH FOR RCRA WASTE DETERMINATION QUANTITY PRICE Senior Field Technition $50.00 /HOUR $0.00 3 Professional Engineer $100.00 /H©UR $0.00 4 TCLP ANALYSIS FOR EIGHT RCRA METALS $325.00 /EVENT 10.00 $3,250.001 5 TOTAL HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ANALYSIS $100.00 /SAMPLE 1.00 $100.00 5a TOTAL RGRA-ETM41—MTME7Ar— ANALYSIS - COMPOSITE OF TEN (10) SAMPLES. $300.00 /SAIVIPLE 1.00 $300.00 5!� SUB OT`AL "3,650.00 H )REWORK LEAD SOIL ANALYSIS AROUND SITE EXTENDED rGAD:O:perator IMETER QUANTITY PRICE ional Engineer $100.00 /HOUR 2.50 $250.00 5 $65.00 /HOUR 3.00 $195.00 7 TOTAL LEAD ANALYSIS $50.00 /EACH 4.00 $200.00 fi EQUIPMENT - DECONTAMINATION $105.00 /DAY 1.00, $105.00 9 �mmw wu''u wwmm!wiwwwu� o u w mw our... wrw rmrmi .- u nx�m yy��;;�� ,yy�� �y �y off wwww�ww wu mwuucwwuuruomuw.wiw mnaiwwraumm imm �' CTL 75'0 L.A l.w iwuum TOTAL 9,400.01 PAGE 1 01: 1 TNCLOS I I (1) <WHARTON SMITH-ESTIMATE-3> Wharton-Smith, Inc. CONSTRUCTION GROUP Subcontractor:Exceletech Subcontract Analysis FKAA Cudjoe Key AWRF 12-071 Quantities Total Subcontract Descriptions Units uom Unit Price Price Excelectech's Payment App.#3 612113-6114113: Operator 1 73.75 mh $ 62.00 $ 4,572.50 Operator 2 72.25 mh $ 62.00 $ 4,479.50 Laborer 1 73.75 mh $ 53.00 $ 3,908.75 Laborer 2 72.25 mh $ 53.00 $ 3,829.25 Perdiems,30.00 per man,4 men 10 days 40 dys $ 30.00 $ 1,200.00 Lodging 1 Is $ 2,150.79 $ 2,150.79 Pollution Insurance 1 Is $ 2,676.88 $ 2,676.88 Excavator 1 Is $ 4,212.23 $ 4,212.23 Water Truck 1 Is $ 3,628.60 $ 3,628.60 Total this Application: $ 30,658.50 Excelectech's Payment App.#4 6115113-6130113: $ - Operator 1 124.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 7,719.00 Operator 2 106.75 mh $ 62.00 $ 6,618.50 Laborer 1 96.75 mh $ 53.00 $ 5,127.75 Laborer 2 124.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 6,598.50 Perdiems,30.00 per man,2 men 11 days 22 dys $ 30.00 $ 660.00 Perdiems,30.00 per man,2 men 9.5 days 19 dys $ 30.00 $ 570.00 Lodging 1 Is $ 2,498.39 $ 2,498.39 Excavator 1 Is $ 4,212.23 $ 4,212.23 Water Truck 1 Is $ 2,673.80 $ 2,673.80 Total this Application: $ 36,678.17 Excelectech's Payment App.#6 711113-7110113: $ - Operator 1 44.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 2,759.00 Operator 2 44.5 mh $ 62.00 $ 2,759.00 Laborer 1 44.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 2,358.50 Laborer 2 44.5 mh $ 53.00 $ 2,358.50 Perdlems,30.00 per man,4 men 10 days 20 dys $ 30.00 $ 600.00 Blood Work 1 Is $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Lodging 1 Is $ 1,564.22 $ 1,564.22 Excavator 1 Is $ - Water Truck 1 Is $ - Total this Application: $ 13,699.22 "'Excecletech's Invoice Is short$200.00" Totals $ 142,808.91 lop of Ash Top of Liner Elevations of Cemented Ash Sheet C-2 s; Column 1 2 13 4 5 6 7 A �A 8' A B "�A „' A B } g,r. A $ � r, A i )3. �.A ",� A S „A S,' A „A TOA TOE A TOA fi .L A TOA If A TOA TKO( A TOA TfJL d TOA TC)4 A TOA TO' A 1 6 8 5,9 ' 0.9 6 1 0.2 5.6 $, 0.0 6.t�fl�llrffiq, 1 0 f f fai i' 2 57 4n�J 0.8 60 48 1.2 5.8 (+;Ta �1.1 5. 1.1 %// % 3 3 5.3 ,�) 0.3 51 4P' 0.3 5,1 4 0.4 5. 0.9 5.4 ,: 12fJ � ����/j �, 0 4 1 4 1 7 ! 7 2 ,8 .6 6. 5„�) , 1. 6.3 5,,- , 1.1 5. 0.9 6.1 4.$ I 1.3 //� �,�� %�� 5 ... a / 0.7 6w5 5;5 ' 0.9 6.4 ',6 0.8 6. 1.4 6 6 5 1.6 6 7 a,1- ' 1.6 4 8 �, 0.2 6 6.1 A-$ �l 1.3 6 7 4"'7 , 2.0 6 2 4 8 1.6 6. 1.5 5.9 4,5' L4 � 4.5 4, 0.2 4.5 � �;2' 0.3 7 5,6 5.0 ' 0.6 1 5.9 *1:8 1.1 4.4 4,+ 0.0 4. 0.0 4 5 4,5' 0.0 4.7 4 0.7 5.1i:1 a 1.0 i,�� �- i ��ir,,, i, � , ' „,Avera es. 6.2 , 8 ,�ii %/,/,i,� 5.5 rl/%%/li��< 2.5 // ///�, 1.5 34.3 0.88 elev x 91521.00 = 80491.55 cf = 2981.17 cyds x 1.33 tons/c = 3965 tons 39 27 yds Optimum Moisture x 1.23 (See Compaction Test Report) 4869 tons Notes: The area was calculated by using the elevations depicted on sheet C-2 The columns start from left to right,rows are from top to bottom. The delta(A)is calculated from subtracting the elevation of the Top of Liner(TOL)from the Top of Ash(TOA) The volumn(cubic feet)was calculated by using the sum of each column(34.3)divided by the number of elevation points(39)indicated on sheet C-2 multiplied by the aera The area was calculated by using the areas indicated on sheet C-3 The sum was then divided by 27 cf to obtain the cubic yards. The tonage is based on a weight of 100 pounds per cubic feet,2700 pounds per cubic yard:27cf x 100=2700 pounds k ATTACHMENT "B" Wharton-Smith, Inc. CONSTRUCTION GROUP Waste Management Invoices: (a) Total Tonnage 8,787 From Haul Log (b) Total Number of Trucks 405 From Haul Log (c) Average weight per Truck 21.70 (a+b) Additional Tonnage: (d) WM Tonnage from Tickets 8,787 From Haul Log (e) Sheet C-2 Estimate Tonnage: 4,869 (0 HDPE Liner 100 Estimate (g) Additional Tonnage 3,818 (a-e-0 Additional Trucking Cost: (h) Additional Tons 3,818 From(g)Above (i) Average weight per Truck(tons) 21.70 6) Additional Trucks(Loads) 175 (h+i) (k) Cost Per Truck $ 600.00 From Waste Management Quote (i) Environmental Fee Per Truck $ 14.00 From Waste Management Quote (m) Fuel Surcharge per Truck 7.90% $ 47.40 From Waste Management Quote (n) Total per Truck Load $ 661.40 (k+)+m) (o) Additional Trucks 175 From 6) above (p) Total Additional Trucking $ 115,745.00 (n x o) Additional Landfill Cost: (q) Dump Charges for Ash $ 32.50 From Waste Management Quote (r) Additional Tonnage 3,818 From (g)Above (s) Subtotal $ 124,085.00 (q x r) (t) Fuel Surcharge per Ton 7,90% $ 9,802.72 From Waste Management Quote (u) Total Additional Tonnage Charge $ 133,887.72 (s x t) Summary: Additional Trucking: $ 115,745.00 Additional Landfill Cost: $ 133,887.72 $ 249,632.72 (u+p) I.WIW� l o FI91'Wwl•D - uoperotlJop yoiaen y>foalg NV7d SN071ION00 3175 ONIlSIX3 HO1d3A'8 NOVI9 IIY .(1I7I0b'd NOIlVWb'703H 831b'M 030Nb'AOV — AlIa0H1nv 1on03nov sl3>l MOIa0l3 x' I ,, I r� s� a=+ r" a= � °a��a r. a Fi § � � as �' � ,cnvoarrr ! gga a 3 Y aau � aeaaes^>•rry w � a `•� � �, o a" ��� r t3 `& �" �I a �. � , g s lm/ 6 g a� ( 3� a r� a rvnsaaps r yq� RE1� ....,..... .q. Sta���$ $ ar �" 4466�Sti3 tm '0� a•11 v.,.°.. 1 e�� �..,..n, c'°'"`�". �""aT� %i �/���,y'^r",t`'--�-��a�E� � pw ��I! +(,��il���,�l/(i�I�s /h/ •4 a WZ�r k5 �I I jr1� �1�11 SIR �i� Ii l,}51f a f o A ill 4 >,1�l �' a� ,S�il��1 1'41 t,Yr1 w w 7777 Il�l� w� s'a•aa aiw ;^/" rl x+ I• M�s ` _ P,m^'+;�i _,.—,ice Y> r 148 I E i �. I •y, I I � I j � , }I I 4 I I ros.1.�•;� ,rm wl - ,,. evarrn,w•.ur/uawar mvo ♦� •