Item P4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: November 20, 2012 Division: Administration
Bulk Item: Yes No X Department: County Administrator
Staff Contact/Phone#: Rhonda Haag, 292-4482
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Request APPROVAL of Resolution - 2012 to accept the
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan (RCAF) providing actionable recommendations in
support of regionally coordinated strategies and efforts in the areas of climate change mitigation and
adaptation planning, and community resilience AND AUTHORIZE the County Administrator to
implement the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan to the extent possible with current
resources and to seek grants and partnerships to assist in further implementation.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The County is a member of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact, and hosted the 3 rd Climate Summit in Key Largo in December, 2011, where the draft RCAF
was released for 90 days for public comment. Public comment from over 100 people was received and
incorporated into the RCAP, resulting in this final RCAF — which represents the most significant
milestone and work project of the Southeast Florida Regional change compact to date.
It is the culmination of more than three years of technical and planning process involving collaboration
arriong Broward, Monroe, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties, and reflecting the Support Of
diverse agencies and stakeholders from across the region. In accordance with the commitments made
by each of the Compact Partners, this document provides the foundation for building community
resilience through concerted action in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to regional and
local impacts of a changing climate. The recommendations presented here aim to accomplish these
goals while also serving to protect the assets of the region's unique quality of life and economy,
guiding future investments, and fostering livable, sustainable and resilient communities.
On January 20, 2010 the Monroe Board of County Commissioners approved the Compact by
Resolution 022-2010. The Compact was the outcome of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Leadership Summit hosted on October 23, 2009 by Broward County in partnership with Miami-Dade,
Monroe and Palm Beach Counties. The Climate Change Compact, developed in collaboration with
representatives from each of the four partner counties and jointly approved by each of the respective
Boards, and included the following commitments:
• Coordinate in climate policy development and advocacy;
• Collaborate in the development of common baseline tools for planning;
• Dedicate staff time and resources to create a Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Action Plan to include mitigation and adaptation strategies; and
• Meet annually in Regional Climate Summits to mark progress and identify emerging issues.
A Compact Staff Steering Committee, comprised of representatives from each of the partner counties,
was created early on to coordinate and oversee Compact implementation and was later expanded to
provide for municipal representation. Technical work groups were convened to develop regionally
coordinated baseline planning tools, including a regional greenhouse gas emissions inventory, a unified
sea level rise projection, and a common methodology for mapping inundation and performing
vulnerability assessments. The Steering Committee then convened three work groups (Built
Environment, Transportation, and Natural Systems and Agriculture) for the purpose of reviewing
information and developing recommendations in each of these topical areas. More than 100 individuals
representing the public and private sector as well as not-for-profit entities and other stakeholders
participated and lent their expertise to this process. A draft report including 106 recommendations was
unveiled at the 3`1 Annual SE Florida Regional Climate Leadership Summit hosted by Monroe County
in December 2011.
Following its December 2011 release, the Draft Regional Climate Action Plan was posted for 90 days
for public comment. The Staff Steering Committee received comment from nearly 100 different
individuals. All comments were cataloged and the Steering Committee met on two separate occasions
to review and consider all feedback and suggestions. Separate work groups were convened to assist
with revisions to recommendations pertaining to the subjects of Water Resources and Agriculture.
Notable edits to the final Regional Climate Action Plan document include:
• Discussion of governance structure and resources and their influence on implementation;
• Inclusion of a separate section dedicated to Agriculture;
• Inclusion of separate section focused on Public Policy and Outreach; and
• Preparation of an informal companion document as an Implementation Guide.
This Regional Climate Action Plan recognizes the diversity of issues across Southeast Florida, and that
implementation of the recommendations contained within will inevitably occur at various stages and
varying degrees by a multitude of agencies and jurisdictions, but with the benefit of working within a
regional context. The Plan provides the common framework for Sustainable Communities and
Transportation Planning to be aligned across the region, as implemented. It recognizes the need to
protect and address our vulnerable Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure and to preserve our
fragile Natural S stems. The plan provides for steps to move towards resilience and reduce emissions
through exploring alternatives and decreasing our use of Energy and Fuel. The plan builds upon our
strength as effective emergency responders and integrates climate change hazards in Risk Reduction.
and Emer ency Management planning. Finally, the Regional Climate Action Plan proposes to create a
common vocabulary for Outreach and Public Policy development to effectively communicate the steps
from risk to resilience with the general public, voters, elected officials and decision makers in
Southeast Florida, the state and the nation.
The Compact planning process and the recommendations of the Regional Climate Action Plan have
been well-vetted, generally receiving broad support and accolades. In addition to the 90 days of public
comment, the Regional Climate Action Plan has been presented as a draft document to diverse
audiences at the local, regional, and national levels, inclusive of government agency staff and business
groups, suli jcct matter experts and academics, as well as laypersons. Key presentations have included
the following audiences and venues: Broward Climate Change Task Force; the Broward Workshop
Annual Retreat; the Annual Palm Beach Planning Congress; the 2012 Coastal Cities Summit in St.
Petersburg; the 2012 ACCO (Association of Climate Change Officers) Summit in Weston; SeaGrant
Climate Communities of Practice in Jacksonville; National Climate Assessment Workshop in
Charleston, SC; FAU Sea Level Rise Summit in Palm Beach County; and Green Government
Symposium in Washington D.C.
Today, this work product is serving as the foundation document for the Resilience Element as part of
the 7-County Prosperity Plan being developed by the South Florida and Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Councils as part of the Seven50 planning process and the HUD Sustainable Communities
Initiative.
The Regional Climate Action Plan represents an extensive body of work and reflects the contributions
and technical expertise of many individuals. Full implementation will require voluntary participation of
and collaboration with many agencies and jurisdictions. These collective efforts will serve to build
community resilience through practices that conserve resources, reduce risk and economic losses, and
improve the health of our community and the environment.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On January 20, 2010 the BOCC approved the
Compact by Resolution 022-2010.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT: Not applicable.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this plan. Costs associated with
implementation of individual projects or initiatives recommended in the plan would be subject to the
traditional budget process and require approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Investments in
community sustainability and climate adaptation are expected to provide long-term cost benefits to the
region, through new economic development opportunities and infrastructure planning and
improvements that reduce risk and future economic losses.
TOTAL COST: $0 INDIRECT COST: BUDGETED: Yes —No X
DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: N/A
COST TO COUNTY: $0 for Plan, Proiects Cost TBD SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No X A MOU)T PER MONTH Year
E APPROVD BY: County Atty */Pur using Risk Managemert
DOCUMENTATION: Included X Not Required
DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM #
Revised 7/09
Rl-"SOI,U'I'ION NO. -2012
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ACCEPT THE REGIONAL
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN OF THE SE FLORIDA REGIONAL
CLIMATE CHANGE FOUR COUNTY COMPACT.
WHEREAS, there is consensus among the world's leading scientists that global climate
change is among the most significant problems facing the world today; and
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has determined that
climate change, in conjunction with changes in land use and demographics, will affect important
human dimensions in the United States, especially those related to human health, settlements and
welfare; and
WHEREAS, Florida is considered one of the most vulnerable areas in the country to the
consequences of climate change with Southeast Florida on the front line to experience the impacts
11
of climate change, especially sea level rise; and
WHEREAS, it is a valid public purpose for local and regional governments, and Southeast
Florida as a whole, to give significant consideration to adaptation strategies designed to protect
public infrastructure, property, water resources, natural areas and native species, and basic quality of
life; and
WHEREAS, Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Monroe Counties (Compact
Counties), as the four Counties who are party to the Southeast Florida Re ional Climate Change
91 11
Compact, have demonstrated national and international leadership through the formation and
execution of the (-,ompact; and
WHEREAS, 1\1onroe County adopted Resolution 022-20 10 on January 20, 2010, Pledging
to work with other counties party to, among other things, work in close collaboration to develop a
Souillvast Flem*da Re,ional Clilliale,4ell'on Plan representing, in part or in whole, districts within the area
c(,)vcrcd by the Compact; and
WHEREAS, the Southeast 11'loliela Rell,,ional Cli;,,vale Action Plan represents, in part or in whole,
districts within the area covered by the County; and
WHEREAS, it serves a public purpose for Monroe County to accept the Southeast I'lon'da
&(,,�ioiial Clifilate Action Plan created by the Compact;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY:
1. As an ongoing effort to develop and collaborate regionally on energy/climate issues, the Board of
County, ('on-iiiiissioners of Monroe County, in conjunction with the Compact Counties, affirms its
acceptance of theSoulbeav Florida Regional Clilvale,,Iclion Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit",V'.
2. The Board of County Commissioners also authorizes the County Administrator to implement the
)'oul&aj-1 Vlmida Re na,g*io Aclion Nan to the extent possible with current resources and to seek
grant,-, and partnerships to assist in further implementation in accordance with T\Ionroe County
Code, Monroe County policy and procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTI-D by the Board of County Commissioners of-t\lonroe County,,, Florida,
at a meeting of said Board held on the 20th day of November, 2012.
Mayor David Rice
-t\,Iavor Pro Tein Heather Carruthers
Cormul'sSioner Kim Wigington
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner Sylvia Murphy
BOARD OF COUNTY
COI\ENIISSIONERS
OF NIIONROE COUNTY,
FLORIDA
Bv:
flavor
(Seal) Attest Danny L. Kolhage, Clerk MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY,,,
(a f EL A nNEY
Deputy Clerk te
2 P a g
EXHIBIT "A"
SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
REGIONAL CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
31 Page
y
fl
m
4
o i
r�
ff
016
r /li r 1
uuu�u�luulllullllllllllllllllll
��i ( uuuuuuuuuu�uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
�1
c
r
i rw�Pd
�V
A Region Responds to a Changing Climate
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties
Regional Climate Action Plan
October 2012
I. Executive Summary................................................................................................................................iii
11. Introduction and Background: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
as Guidance for Regional Policy and Planning ........................................................................................I
III. Compact Awards and Recognitions ........................................................................................................2
IV. Compact Work Completed......................................................................................................................3
a. Policy and Advocacy.............................................................................................................................3
b.A Baseline of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Southeast Florida...........................................................5
c. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.............................................................
d. Inundation Mapping and Vulnerability Assessment of Areas at Risk by Sea Level Rise........................8
V. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan Planning Process........................................................ 10
• Structure of the Regional Climate Action Plan.................................................................................. I
• RCAP... Regional and Municipal Government Collaboration and Shared Implementation.............12
VI. Regional Plan Recommendations ..........................................................................................................13
• Sustainable Communities and Transportation Planning...................................................................13
• Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure................................................................................26
• Natural Systems................................................................................................................................31
• Agriculture........................................................................................................................................35
• Energy and Fuel................................................................................................................................36
• Risk Reduction and Emergency Management...................................................................................39
• Outreach and Public Policy...............................................................................................................42
VII. Conclusions...........................................................................................................................................48
• The Significance of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact...............48
• Next Steps......................................................................................................................49
VIII. Appendices...........................................................................................................................................A-1
A. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact....................................................................A-1
B. Work Group Recommendations.....................................................................................................B-1
C. Contributing Technical and Staff Experts ......................................................................................C-1
D. Regional Transportation Network..................................................................................................D-1
W IX. w
Supporting Documents..........................................................................................................................80 z
cr wCc
A. Regional Climate Action Plan Implementation Guide O O w p
B. Compact Counties'Policy and Advocacy Implementation Report Q O v
}
C. Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Baseline Period: 2005 -2009 z ¢
D.A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida 6 m
O z 0 c)
W � Wzf
E. Analysis of the Vulnerability of Southeast Florida to Sea Level Rise O a,
CC Q ��
F. Adaptation Action Areas (Florida Department of Economic Opportunity White Paper) 0 ¢ z
co
111
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Regional Climate Action Plan is the result of true collaboration—this document and its many supporting
publications are the product of existing staff and resources from the various cooperating agencies.No additional
public dollars were dedicated to this effort.The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact was forged
during the most difficult national economy since the Great Depression.We came together with purpose and
quickly realized the value of sharing resources,expertise and information. Competitors became collaborators.
Challenges became successes.At a moment when local government is pressed to achieve maximum efficiency, the
Compact enabled a level of intergovernmental cooperation unprecedented in Southeast Florida's history.Many
have contributed to the Compact process, including more than 90 members of the public that took the time to
submit comments to a previously published draft.While several individuals are recognized here,Appendix C
contains a full list of the people and organizations that helped bring this Regional Climate Action Plan to fruition,
Staff Steering Committee
Mr.Jon Van Arnam, Palm Beach County
Ms. Carrise Lejeune,City of Boynton Beach (Palm Beach County)
Dr.Jennifer Jurado, Broward County
Ms. Patti Webster, Broward County
Ms. Susanne Torriente, City of Fort Lauderdale(Broward County)
Ms. Nichole Hefty,Miami-Dade County
Mr. Mark Woerner,Miami-Dade County
Mr. Roman Gastesil Monroe County
Mr. Michael Roberts,Monroe County
Ms.Alison Higgins,City of Key West(Monroe County)
Mr. Rod Braun, South Florida Water Management District
Ms. Kim Shugar, South Florida Water Management District(former)
Mr.Jim Murley,South Florida Regional Planning Council (ex officio)
Mr. Steve Adams,Institute for Sustainable Communities(staff)
Support and Technical Staff
Ms. Bonnie Finneran, Palm Beach County
Mr.John Reiser, Palm Beach County
Dr. Nancy Gassman,Broward County
Mr. Donald Burgess,Broward County
Ms. Debbie Griner,Miami-Dade County
Ms. Rhonda Haag,Monroe County
Mr. Kevin Wilson,Monroe County
Mr. Doug Gregory,Monroe County
Ms. Diana Umpierre,South Florida Water Management District
Dr.Jayantha Obeysekera, South Florida Water Management District
Mr. Chris Bergh,The Nature Conservancy
Joint Policy Advisory Team
Mr.Jon Van Arnam,Palm Beach County
Mr.Todd Bonlarron, Palm Beach County
Mr. Robert Robbins,Palm Beach County
Ms. Bonnie Finneran, Palm Beach County
Mr. Rich Walesky, Palm Beach County(former)
Dr.Jennifer Jurado,Broward County
Ms. Patti Webster, Broward County
Ms. Susanne Torriente, City of Fort Lauderdale
Mr.Joe Rasco,Miami-Dade County
Mr. Paul Voight,Miami-Dade County
Mr. Roman Gastesi, Monroe County
Mr.Michael Roberts,Monroe County
Mr. Rod Braun, South Florida Water Management District
Ms. Kim Shugar, South Florida Water Management District(former)
Southeasl Florida R Clwlale Chai te(.af.�zPactC,(vf imies- C#Aiah,=Afiall Aull IV
Welcome to the first Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan. The Southeast Florida
Regional Climate Change Compact (Compact), a unique and collaborative effort among
Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, Monroe Counties, their municipalities and partners,
has worked over the past two years to develop this plan with an initial five-year horizon.
The plan is a critical milestone of the Compact, entered into by Palm Beach, Broward,
Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties in January 2010. Much of the Compact's work up to
this point has served to unite, organize, and assess our region through the lens of climate
change in setting the stage for action. Specific accomplishments include the development of
regionally-consistent methodologies for mapping sea-level rise impacts, assessing vulnerability,
and understanding the sources of regional greenhouse gas emissions. Collectively, these work
products provide the foundation for this Regional Climate Action Plan, which calls for
concerted action in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to regional and local
impacts of a changing climate. The recommendations presented here aim to accomplish those
goals while also serving to protect the assets of the region's unique quality of life and economy,
guiding future investments, and fostering livable, sustainable and resilient communities.
The Compact was established with a strong recognition of the region's diversity and its
commonalities. It accepted the varying degrees of progress in the areas of climate change
adaptation and mitigation in order to inform, to improve, and to advance regional planning efforts
together. This Regional Climate Action Plan too recognizes the diversity of Southeast Florida, yet
provides the common framework for Sustainable Communities and Transportation Planning
to be aligned across the region, as implemented. Inevitably this will occur at various stages and
varying degrees, but with the benefit of working within a regional context. This is Southeast
Florida, with all its uniqueness; the plan recognizes the need to protect and address our vulnerable
Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure and preserve our fragile Natural Systems
and Agricultural resources. The plan provides for steps to move toward resilience and reduce
emissions through exploring alternatives and decreasing our use of Energy and Fuel. The plan
builds upon our strength as effective emergency responders and integrates climate change hazards
in Risk Reduction and Emergency Management planning. Finally, the Regional Climate Action
Plan creates a common vocabulary for Outreach and Public Policy development to effectively
communicate the steps from risk to resilience with the general public, voters, elected officials and
decision makers in Southeast Florida, the state and the nation.
The specific recommendations put forth in this plan were developed through a collaborative
process involving nearly 100 subject matter experts from a host of professions representing the
V A Region Re pon&fo a Changing Climate
public and private sectors, area universities, and not-for-profit
organizations. These stakeholders brought to the table the knowledge
of their "craft" as well as information on successful initiatives
already underway locally or in other communities. Many of the
recommendations build upon best practices sprinkled throughout
our region, such as regional collaboration on transportation planning
and land use criteria that foster walkable and healthy communities.
Others delve into "new" frontiers in calling for the integration of
climate change into planning and decision-making processes in ways
that no local government has yet implemented.
The overall objective was and remains to integrate climate adaptation and mitigation into existing
decision-making systems and to develop a plan that can be implemented through existing local
and regional agencies, processes and organizations. It is in that spirit that this plan provides the
common integrated framework for a stronger and � s
more resilient Southeast Florida starting today and
for tomorrow.
6� �/ �r%
r
The 110 action items detailed in the plan's seven / � , ry/
goal areas are to be accomplished over the next 1 ii/
�,; V➢
five Pk mar to reports ears with annual re progress.
Y P g
The policy recommendations will be implemented
through several approaches including:
• existing legal structures, planning and ��
decision-making processes;
• the development of new policy guiding documents by local and regional governing
bodies; the development of operational guidance documents;
• the development of consistent goals and progress indicators throughout the various
governments in the region;
• a coordinated multi-disciplinary outreach and education program; and
• processes for focused and prioritized investments
Every organization in the region has a role to play in making Southeast Florida a resilient and
sustainable community of communities.
VI A Region Reponds to a Changing Chmale
11. Introduction and Background: SoutheastFloridaClimate ,
Complact Guidance for Regional Policy and Planning
Southeast Florida is considered one of the most vulnerable areas to climate change and sea level
rise. In the spring of 2009, several Southeast Florida counties and cities were making the rounds
in the halls of Congress to advocate for climate policy. A great deal of work had been invested
individually by each jurisdiction; however, each had slightly different baseline emissions figures
at different points of time and different sea level rise planning scenarios. The need for regional
coordination became quite evident. With 5.6 million residents within the geographic boundaries of
the four counties as of the 2010 Census, exceeding the population of 30 states and representing
30 percent of Florida's population and Gross Domestic Product, there is an obvious and unique
strength in the region's size and in numbers. That realization paved the way for a unique
arrangement — the Compact — a voluntary and cooperative partnership among governing bodies
to tackle one of, if not the most important issue facing our generation. This targeted and focused
collaborative is the vision and framework for regional resilience. It respects the diversity of the
region and the autonomy of the many governing bodies.
The Compact began with a commitment among elected officials representing each of the four
counties to return to Southeast Florida and to coordinate in the hosting of a regional climate
summit. The Summit would serve as a platform for broader discussion among county and
municipal elected officials and the community as to the pressures and challenges that climate
change poses for Southeast Florida with a call for unified action. Just four months later, their
vision began to take shape when the four County Commissions jointly held the 2009 Regional
Climate Leadership Summit. This first Regional Summit led to the ratification of the Southeast
Florida Regional Climate Change Compact by January 2010, with unanimous votes within each
County Commission (Appendix A). Since adoption, the Counties have assigned existing staff
resources to support implementation of the Compact under the direction of a Compact Staff
Steering Committee.
The Compact Staff Steering Committee is comprised of two staff members from each county,
one municipal representative from each county and a non-voting member from the South Florida
Water Management District who was invited to participate. Municipal members represent the cities
of Fort Lauderdale, Key West and Boynton Beach. The Compact Staff Steering Committee is a
small, core group of professional staff engaged in this process since 2009.
Southeast Florida Kegional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan
The Compact commitments include:
• Joint legislative policy development;
• Development of a regional greenhouse gas (GHG) baseline;
• Development of regionally consistent sea level rise projections for the coming
decades;
• Development of Preliminary Inundation Mapping;
• Development of a Regional Climate Action Plan; and
• Coordination of Annual Leadership Summits.
The Compact paved the way for early work in 2010
to develop the unified regional baseline and sea level
rise planning scenarios. Summaries of these work
products are provided in Section IV. This early
work served as the foundation for the development of
this regional framework through three Work Groups:
�,.. Built Environment, Transportation, and Land and
Natural Systems. These Work Groups were chaired
by Staff Steering Committee members and expanded
to include local and regional experts from the public
and private sectors and academia.
111. Compact Awards and Recognitions
Since adoption, the Compact has won recognition through awards from ICLEI and the National
Association of Counties, a requested white paper from the White House Domestic Policy
Council, a request to host a listening session for the White House Council on Environmental
Quality's (CEQ Interagency Adaptation Task Force, and specific references within the Task
Force's Final Report to the president. Subsequent federal agency engagement in the Compact has
been highlighted in CEQ reports to the president, including the most recent Task Force report
submitted in October 2011.
2 A ReSion Responds to a Chatrgiq Climale
Compactw r k, Comp d
The adoption of the Compact initiated an ambitious schedule requiring the completion of a robust
body of work leading to this Regional Climate Action Plan. Since Compact adoption in January
2010, the four Compact Counties have completed the following:
a. Policy and Advocacy
Sections 1 — 4 of the Compact Resolution commit the Compact Counties to develop joint climate
and energy-related policy positions and advocacy strategies to influence state and federal legislation.
Specifically, provisions of the Compact call for urging Congress to pass legislation that: recognizes
the unique vulnerabilities of Southeast Florida to climate change impacts, especially sea level rise;
allocates federal climate change funding based on vulnerabilities; designates areas of Southeast
Florida as uniquely vulnerable and of federal interest for the purpose of securing enhanced levels of
federal participation in regional adaptation projects; and supports strengthening policies relating to
global climate change.
Since the ratification of the Compact, the Compact partners have advanced policy and advocacy
goals through joint positions, resolutions, letters and funding proposals and advocacy in Tallahassee
and Washington, D.C. In addition, during the 111`' and 112' sessions of the United States
Congress, the Compact partners collaborated in the submittal of a joint Climate Adaptation Pilot
Project Proposal, a funding request to support regional hydrologic modeling needed to guide
adaptation planning in response to projected sea level rise. In May 2010, elected officials and other
leaders representing the Compact Counties jointly advocated in Washington, D.C. to highlight the
region's vulnerabilities and needs related to climate change impacts, to seek support for greater
recognition of adaptation strategies in federal climate policies and for the appropriations of projects
such as the regional Pilot Project.
On June 24, 2010, in response to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill that threatened the region's
environment and economy, the Compact Counties conducted a well-attended conference calling
for comprehensive federal energy policy and protection of Florida's state and federal waters from
the impact of oil drilling. In concert with local municipalities and Leagues of Cities, the event
produced the Southeast Florida Response to Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Letter to President
Obama and resolutions in support for comprehensive climate legislation, restoration of damages
due to the oil spill and for a ban on oil drilling within Florida's Territorial Waters.
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climale Action Plan
As a centerpiece of the Compact Counties' commitment to developing
regional legislative policies and advocacy strategies, the Compact Counties efincilt
adopted the 2011 and 2012 Southeast Florida State and Federal Energy and
Climate Legislative Programs and utilized these programs as the basis of
joint advocacy to Congress and the Florida Legislature. The 2011/12 State
and Federal Legislative Programs include support for:
• the Southeast Florida Climate Adaptation Pilot Project Proposal;
• providing a definition of "Adaptation Action Areas (AAA)" in state
law;
• greater recognition of adaptation as a critical climate strategy;
• adopting a State Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard of 20 percent renewable energy by
2020;
• federal legislation to create and fund new infrastructure programs to assist local governments
in adapting to the impacts of sea level rise;
• federal recognition of AAA's for the purpose of funding infrastructure vulnerable to sea level
rise
• removing federal barriers to Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) and PACE-like
programs, posed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to encourage energy efficiency and
renewable energy improvements for residential homes and commercial buildings; and
• opposing oil drilling in federal waters on Florida's Outer Continental Shelf and the
Everglades.
�I
r
D/ Utilizing the Compact Counties' Legislative
Programs as guidance during the 2011
Florida Legislative Session, the Compact
j Counties were successful in helping to
IK J, � jff amend state law to reflect priority policy
goals. The regional partners helped
draft and led efforts to provide for a
designation of "Adaptation Action Areas"
in Florida's growth management laws, thus creating a new tool for local governments to identify
areas vulnerable to coastal flooding resulting from the impacts of sea level rise and to prioritize
infrastructure improvements and funding for improved resilience. Immediately following changes to
4 A Region Responds to a Chagiq Curate
state law, a Members Letter was signed by several members of Florida's Congressional Delegation
requesting support for defining AAA in federal law. Subsequent to the Members Letter, the
Compact Counties' lobbyists and Delegation Members have requested the inclusion of language
enabling at-risk, multi county regions impacted by sea level rise to qualify for 2012 Energy and
Water Appropriations. During the 2012 Florida Legislative Session the Compact Counties were
successful in helping to amend the Florida Energy Act to provide for commercial buildings to
qualify for energy efficiency program funding through the Local Option Sales Tax.
The Regional Climate Action Plan contains actionable recommendations related to public policy and
outreach in recognition of the fact that a continued commitment to collaborate with local, state
and federal policy makers, as well as the non-profit and private sectors, is fundamental to long-term
success of the Compact. Additionally, the continued and enhanced role of policy advocacy through
regional collaboration, especially during tumultuous economic and political times, are important to
ensure that current efforts are not undermined and the Compact Counties' future efforts related to
sustainability are achieved.
b. A Baseline of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Southeast Florida
Prior to the Compact, many jurisdictions within Southeast Florida had completed emission
inventories using a variety of baseline years. The Compact called for the identification and
quantification of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions across Southeast Florida "with a particular
focus on emissions from inter-county travel and commerce." Consistent with this charge, staff
estimated GHG emissions resulting from an inventory of select sectors — transportation and the
built environment divided into residential, commercial and industrial subsectors — using the ICLEI
International Local Government Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP) within the ICLEI Clean Air
and Climate Protection 2009 (CACP 2009) software. "Non-regional" emissions such as the waste
sector (including landfill and wastewater treatment) and local government operations were not
included as they were deemed to be primarily under the control of individual jurisdictions. Other
sectors such as natural areas and agriculture (including their carbon sequestration or "sink" capacity)
were not included here due to lack of local information.
As emissions track closely with economic output and as this analysis was initiated during the most
significant economic downturn since the 1930s, staff decided to inventory annual emissions for each
year from 2005 through 2009 (five full years) and average the results for each sector over those five
years for use as a future baseline. By doing so, the inventory averages contain years of both high
growth and contraction. The full Regional Inventory report is included as a supporting document
to the Regional Climate Action Plan process.
Youtheasl Floiida Re ion al C.'hmale Chan ge Cozxlpacl Counties-Repional Climiate F-lai(wi P.1an
PN6
ri
i
ra,
MOM
Southeast Florida peaked in total GHG emissions in 2006 and declined in the following three
years, consistent with the performance of the national economy during this period (Table 1).
The relative emissions contribution of each County to the aggregated regional emissions reflects
population and size.
Table 1: Regional Emissions by County (MMTCO e)
WIN,� =11111 1SS� 11SES
�b�
Broward 22,655,421 22,657,880 21,921,832 21,216,712 20,810,719
Miami-Dade 28,715,847 29,058,677 27,832,307 27,057,988 26 859,326
Monroe 1,504,047 1,532,500 1,465,634 1,408,288 1,417,206
PI Beach 16,588#536 16,658,369 15,920,„070 15,785,752 15,675,11.74
Regional Sources 254,537 25'0,984 237,691 222,113 �155,359
Totals 69,718,390 70,158,412 67,377,537 65,690,854 64,917,785
Regional emissions, across all sectors examined, were approximately 64.9 million metric tonnes
of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) in 2009, down from 69.7 MMTCO2e in 2005. The
five-year average of emissions (67.6 MMTCO2e) shows that the transportation sector is the largest
single source of regional emissions. The Residential and Commercial buildings sectors jointly
contribute 54 percent to regional emission (Table 2).
Tabl"ReAonal s by Sector ("18,685,83318,186,886
Resi 19,989,441 18,237,990 19,012,757
Commercial 17,884,892 18,212,352 17,356,620 17,314,930 17,083,809 17,570,521
Industrial 1,075,979 1,103,572 961,883 888,111 811,016 968,112
Transportation 30,793,879 30,853,046 30,373,200 1 29,300,926 28,784,969 30,021,204
Totals 69,718,390 70,158,412 67,377,537 65,690,854 64,917,785 67,572,596
6 A Region Responds to a Changing Climate
c. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection
36 Annual Sea Level at Key West
Projected Sea Level Rise Range baser!on USACE Guidance 2060 3
Historic Key West Sea Level Rise Rate for Comparison 9-24 inches
30
u 24 100 2 cu
03
18 3-7 inches r v,
(n CC�y
M
W n ' ^_^'.
W
12 ,R >
mow
V J
w`' 6 • Sea level - 0 ^' , ,.. M
0 fi � M m 0
-6
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 1
Figure 1: Unified Southeast Florida Sea Level Rise Projection for Regional Planning
Purposes. This projection uses historic tidal information from Key West and was calculated by
Kristopher Esterson from the United States Army Corps of Engineers using USACE Guidance
(USACE 2009) intermediate and high curves to represent the lower and upper bound for
projected sea level rise in Southeast Florida. Sea level measured in Key West over the past
several decades is shown. The rate of sea level rise from Key West over the period of 1913
to 1999 is extrapolated to show how the historic rate compares to projected rates. Methods
are described in a supporting document, "A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast
Florida" available online at: southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org.
At the first Regional Climate Leadership Summit, the local diversity in sea level rise (SLR)
projections was highlighted as a concern, and a barrier, to achieving regionally consistent
adaptation policies and demonstrating a coordinated local effort to higher decision-making levels.
Following the summit, the Compact Staff Steering Committee recognized the critical need to unify
the existing local SLR projections to create a single regional SLR projection. Key participants in
developing the existing projections and other local scientists specializing in the areas of sea level
rise and climate change were invited to participate as the Regional Climate Change Compact
Technical Ad hoc Work Group (Work Group). Their objective was to work toward developing
a unified SLR projection for the Southeast Florida region for use by the Compact Counties and
partners for planning purposes to aid in understanding potential vulnerabilities and to provide a
basis for outlining adaptation strategies for the region.
Soulheasl Florida Regrorrul Cli>n rte Cis urge Compcz Counties-Kqrnr a!G/imate ,Ieliae Plan
Through a series of facilitated discussions, the Work Group reviewed
the existing projections and the current scientific literature related
to SLR with particular emphasis on the impact of accelerating ice
melt on projections. The Work Group recommended that the SLR
projection be based on the United States Army Corp of Engineers
(USACE) July 2009 Guidance Document until more definitive
information on future SLR is available. The projection uses Key
West tidal data from 1913-1999 as the foundation of the calculation
and references the year 2010 as the starting date of the projection.
Two key planning horizons are highlighted: 2030 when SLR is
projected to be 3-7 inches and 2060 when SLR is projected to be
9-24 inches. Based on the projection, a SLR of one foot is projected to occur between 2040
and 2070 with sea level continuing to rise into the future. Due to the rapidly changing body of
scientific literature on this topic, the Work Group recommended that the projection be reviewed
and possibly revised four years from final approval by the Compact Staff Steering Committee and
after the release of United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment
Report. "A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida" White Paper is available as a
supporting document to this Regional Climate Action Plan.
d. Inundation Mapping and Vulnerability Assessment of Areas at
Risk by Sea Level Rise
Southeast Florida is highly vulnerable to
SLR due to its peninsular geography and
low topography. Mapping different SLR
inundation scenarios helps to identify areas �1io�
at potential risk and aids in planning �j f
for adaptation strategies. The Compact
Inundation Mapping and Vulnerability
Assessment Work Group was formed to
perform a regional vulnerability assessment.
1,
Geographic Information System (GIS)
practitioners, representing the Compact Counties as well as the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD), local universities and federal agencies, worked with National Oceanographic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center (CSC) experts to understand
inundation mapping methodologies, define the local challenges, review available topographic
A Region Re,ponds to a Changing Climate
source data and create a consensus set of methods and criteria for
inundation mapping. Additional discussions, surveys and workshops
were used to develop planning parameters that would be part of the
regional SLR vulnerability assessment. Using these commonly agreed-
to parameters and data sources, the SFWMD produced inundation p
layers to represent areas potentially vulnerable to one-, two- and
three-foot SLR scenarios. These layers were used by each of the four
Compact Counties to perform a vulnerability assessment for their
jurisdiction. See the supporting publication for the County level
assessments and detailed methods for inundation mapping and the
vulnerability analyses.
All of the Compact Counties are vulnerable to SLR However, the degree and extent of potential
impacts vary across the region due to differences in land elevation and geomorphology. The
southernmost counties are expected to experience the greatest direct impacts, with lessening impacts
as one travels northward. Nearly 80 percent of the lands potentially affected regionally in the one-
foot scenario are conservation lands, especially coastal wetlands. Low lying natural systems made up
of buttonwood, mangrove, scrub mangrove, and herbaceous coastal saline and freshwater wetlands
are significantly impacted in all SLR scenarios. The upper estimate of current taxable property
values in Monroe, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties vulnerable in the one-foot scenario is $4
billion with values rising to more than $31 billion at the three-foot scenario. The greater values
reflected in the financial impacts are coastal residential properties with ocean access and high
taxable value.
In terms of the critical infrastructure reviewed, projected inundation is often confined to marginal
areas of the properties or impacting existing drainage infrastructure on site. This is generally true
for the region's ports, airports, schools, landfills and hospitals. Monroe County is the exception
with predicted building and infrastructure damage to these critical resources especially at the two
rl�y�
it
Soutbeast Florida Regional Clmate Change Conlp wl Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan
and three-foot SLR scenarios. Three of Monroe's four hospitals, 65 percent of schools and 71
percent of emergency shelters are located on property at elevations below sea level at the one-
foot scenario. Power plant properties in Miami-Dade and Broward as well as energy transmission
facilities in Monroe begin to become inundated at the one-foot scenario. While railroads are
negligibly impacted, more than 81 miles of roadway from Miami-Dade through Palm Beach are
impacted at the one-foot scenario, increasing to more than 893 miles at the three-foot scenario.
The intent of the GIS-based analysis conducted by the Compact Work Group was to provide
a preliminary assessment of sea level rise vulnerabilities for regional planning and policymaking
purposes. This analysis did not include other possible impacts associated with sea level rise that
require more complex modeling efforts, or indirect impacts, such as delineating what properties
may become less accessible due to inundated roadways. Despite these limitations, the GIS-
based vulnerability assessment conducted by the Compact Work Group serves to identify areas
of potential concern for regional planning of adaptation strategies. It also highlights the need
for continued mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions as a means to reduce future sea level rise
impacts.
To prepare Southeast Florida for the likely impacts of sea level rise estimated by the vulnerability
assessment, cooperation is vital, not only among the Compact Counties, but also among the
municipalities, local, regional, state and federal agencies serving the region. Strengthening this
regional effort will be critical in order to coordinate public policies and adaptation measures that
ensure the region's sustainability and economic growth
V. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan Planning Process
Members of the Compact Staff Steering Committee and representatives of numerous federal, state,
and county agency partners met in February 2011 for a workshop to review the work completed
to date and plan a course of action going forward. Workshop participants brainstormed issues
including the scope of the Regional Climate Action Plan, criteria to select priority issues, defining
regional versus local efforts, areas of expertise needed in issue specific work groups and how
best to separate issue areas to be examined into logical, workable groupings. Also discussed were
the timeline for the planning process and how to incorporate feedback from the Compact Staff
Steering Committee and other stakeholders.
The Compact Staff Steering Committee organized three work groups to develop specific
recommendations for reducing GHG emissions and building climate resilience across the region.
10 A Region Responds to a Changing Climate
The three work groups, Built Environment, Transportation, and
Land and Natural Systems were designed to bring local experts
with differing work experiences and areas of responsibility together to hit e
share knowledge and expertise. Each work group consisted of more
than 30 individuals from all parts of the four-county region, listed
in Appendix C. Work group participants included representatives of
academia, non-profits, the private sector and all levels of government.
After several work sessions, surveys and much correspondence, draft
recommendations were presented to the Compact Staff Steering
Committee at a July 2011 workshop. After review and comment, the
Compact Staff Steering Committee provided guidance to the three
work groups in finalizing the strategies to be included in the Regional Climate Action Plan and
convened a "Super Committee" to address three cross-cutting issues that emerged separately from
the work groups. The full extent of recommendations from each work group is available as a
supporting publication.
Structure of the Regional Climate Action Plan
To further review, consolidate, and categorize the numerous recommendations, the Super Committee
was created consisting of key representatives from each Work Group, the Work Group chairs, and
representative County staff. The Super Committee worked to consolidate the recommendations into
seven categories, including:
• Sustainable Communities and Transportation Planning
• Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure
• Natural Systems
• Agriculture
• Energy and Fuel
• Risk Reduction and Emergency Management and
• Outreach and Public Policy
The definition of each category and the recommendations are detailed as the Regional Climate
Action Plan.
The draft Regional Climate Action Plan was released at the third annual Regional Climate
Leadership Summit held in Key Largo on December 8 and 9, 2011. The Compact Staff Steering
Committee aggressively sought public input and feedback from December through March 2012.
Southeast Flozdu Rrgional Climate Change Cornpaet Counties-Kegional Climate Action Plan
During this time, many public presentations on the draft plan and the Regional Compact were
delivered throughout the region. Officially, 105 distinct comments were received through the
Compact website from 91 individuals. All comments were reviewed by the Compact Staff Steering
Committee and the Work Group Chairs. Since many comments were focused on the details
of implementation, those thoughts and ideas are captured in the Implementation Guide that is
published as a companion resource to the Regional Climate Action Plan. This public comment
period resulted in a more robust regional document.
RCAP ... Regional and Municipal Government Collaboration and
Shared Implementation
The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact emerged in 2009 as a collaborative
venture among Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties and as such, served
as the impetus for creating a common framework for climate change mitigation and adaptation
strategies throughout the Southeast Florida region. This initial effort for the Compact Counties
to collaborate on a regional scale, proved to be an important first step in gaining public and
political support required for the advancement of this comprehensive planning initiative. Early on,
municipal government engagement and commitment was also recognized as critically important to
the success of the Compact.
11 I 8
There are more than 100 local city
/G �f
governments in the region, each at
varying stages of climate mitigation
and adaptation planning and
uuu�
implementation. To formally begin
collaborative efforts among local WNJ
governments, the Compact Counties
met jointly with municipal government representatives at the Second Annual Climate Leadership
Summit in 2010. More recently, the Compact Staff Steering Committee membership was expanded
with municipal representation to ensure involvement of cities in the drafting of the Regional
Climate Action Plan. Successful implementation of the Regional Climate Action Plan strategies
requires this continued collaboration.
In the forthcoming years, the Compact Counties expect to build coalitions with more
municipalities, the various Leagues of Cities, special districts and other governmental entities,
including the Treasure Coast counties participating in the Seven50 Sustainable Communities
Initiative.
12 A Region Re3ponds to a Changing Climate
The Compact Counties and municipal partners are committed to the implementation of the
Regional Climate Action Plan. Of course, implementation strategies must be sensitive to the
different governance structures of counties and municipalities. Because of the variances in
government structures, management policies, land use authorities, charters (where present), and the
political environments of member counties and municipalities, implementation is expected to take
on different forms. This Plan should be viewed as a framework to help guide policies and projects
and implementation must be flexible to address specific local conditions.
It is also important to emphasize that the Regional Climate Action Plan does not provide a
mandate for any county or municipal actions, but rather serves as a living document with options
that each regional or local government may adopt and utilize based on their interests and vision
for the future. Over time, this document will be enhanced as more data becomes available,
scientific projections are refined, and best management practices are developed and tested.
The success of the planning efforts thus far is a testament to the political leadership and staff
dedication to Southeast Florida. We recognize that by combining our efforts and resources, we
are in a better position moving forward. The Compact is at an important turning point. As each
partner continues to implement different initiatives, at its own pace and within the context of each
individual entity, these individual steps will lead to collective results for a more resilient region.
Join us, no step is too big or too small.
Regional Plan Recommendations
The following recommendations are the result of much labor by many individuals and
organizations dedicated to a more sustainable and resilient Southeast Florida. The 110 actionable
recommendations presented here form the core of Southeast Florida's first Regional Climate Action
Plan. These measures draw from and build upon the experience of each partner gained prior to
regional collaboration. Some, therefore, are familiar requiring only additional partners for differing
scales of implementation. Others are new and designed specifically to address the challenges
that become evident through a regional perspective. The Compact Staff Steering Committee has
produced a companion document, titled the Regional Climate Action Plan Implementation Guide, to
provide further insight and guidance on how each of these recommendations can be put to work
for Southeast Florida. The Regional Climate Action Plan Implementation Guide is available online
at: southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/.
Soy✓/iieaat Florida Region rl Clirr�ate G'harrge Compnet Coy ntie -Regional Climale Aclim Pln�r
Sustainable Communities and Transportation Planning
With the establishment of a Unified SLR Projection and the Preliminary Vulnerability Analysis,
the picture of the likely future of our region is coming into focus. While the specific conditions
at a given point in the future are impossible to predict, the range of potential future conditions
has been defined based upon the best available science which includes an agreed upon level of
uncertainty. This understanding of a likely future allows us to take action now to protect assets
and invest wisely. As the science, monitoring, and modeling of impacts continue to be refined, this
area of the plan recommends actions to integrate climate change consideration into existing and
future policy decision making processes and municipal and county Comprehensive Plans with the
goal to achieve resilience, reduce risk and further greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
As one of many tools available in the comprehensive planning process, this section includes several
recommendations addressing the designation and implementation of Adaptation Action Areas
which are expected to aid in focusing technical assistance and funding opportunities to areas most
vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise and coastal flooding. In 2011, the Florida Legislature
amended state law to provide for Adaptation Action Areas as an optional designation in local
comprehensive plans for those identified areas experiencing coastal flooding due to extreme high
tides and storm surge and the related impacts of sea level rise. The law also provides for the
development of adaptation policies and will maximize funding opportunities for infrastructure
needs associated with Adaptation Action Areas. Subsequent to recent changes to state law,
members of Congress have since requested the
definition of Adaptation Action Areas in federal
law to provide for appropriations for adaptation
planning and infrastructure needs in designated
areas. It is realistic to believe that future funding
opportunities will become available through federal z
and state appropriations and grants for Adaptation
Action Areas or areas similarly designated for
adaptation planning.
Sustainable Communities
1, I Ass*s� s t-rfss °ys ss asses, ass f fn sy rw �, ,r
w O' ors Saw A*
SP-1 Support implementation of the Regional Climate Action Plan by including
14 t Region Responds<o a Changing Cimate
recommendations from the Plan into existing land use and policy decisions and
related elements of the municipal and county Comprehensive Plans, as appropriate;
and recognize the Plan as a basis for the development of new goals, objectives and
policies through the appropriate local government Comprehensive Plans.
SP-2 Develop policies, strategies and standards that will serve as guidance for climate
change related planning efforts. Municipal and county planning authorities are
encouraged to develop policies to improve resilience to coastal and inland flooding,
salt water intrusion, and other related impacts of climate change and sea level rise
in their Comprehensive Plans, Sustainability Action Plans, Vision Plans, Stormwater
Master Plans, Transit Development Plans, Long Range Transportation Plans,
Adaptation Action Area Plans, Climate Change Plans and other green planning
efforts.
SP-3 Incorporate "Adaption Action Area" definition (as provided for in Florida law) into
municipal and/or county Comprehensive Plans, to provide a means to identify those
areas deemed most vulnerable to sea level rise and other climate change impacts
including but not limited to extreme high tides, heavy local rain events, and storm
surge for the purpose of prioritized funding and adaptation planning.
SP-4 Develop criteria in collaboration with municipal and county planning authorities
for the purpose of defining Adaptation Action Areas as well as other areas requiring
adaptation improvements related to coastal flooding and sea level rise that may
include, but not be limited to:
• Areas below, at, or near mean higher high water;
• Areas which have a hydrological connection to coastal waters;
• Areas designated as evacuation zones for storm surge; and/or
• Other areas impacted by climate related drainage/flood control issues.
ar 1 I
^�, A
r fo
ray � � �yifrs /l
'l
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan 15
SP-5 Conduct new or utilize existing vulnerability analysis and other technical tools as they
are developed as a means for identifying Adaptation Action Areas as well as other
areas requiring adaptation improvements related to coastal flooding and sea level rise,
to provide guidance for adaptation planning efforts in areas especially at risk to sea
level rise, tidal flooding and other related impacts of climate change.
SP-G Develop policies, as provided for in Florida law and in collaboration with the
appropriate municipal and county planning authorities, related to areas designated as
Adaptation Action Areas or similarly vulnerable areas to improve resilience to coastal
flooding, sea level rise and other climate related vulnerabilities and provide guidance
for other adaptation planning efforts.
SP-7 Develop sea level rise scenario maps to be considered for inclusion in appropriate
Comprehensive Plans and/or regional planning documents as determined by the
appropriate local government to guide municipal and county government climate
adaptation planning efforts and continue to update regional and local planning cfforts
as more data becomes available and scientific projections are refined.
SP-8 Identify locations within Adaptation Action Areas or similarly vulnerable areas where
targeted infrastructure improvements, new infrastructure, or modified land use and/or
development practices could reduce vulnerability and/or improve community resilience.
SP-9 Coordinate regionally across municipalities and county planning authorities on
the development of projects and funding proposals to seek prioritized funding for
identified infrastructure needs and specific adaptation improvements required within
Adaptation Action Area or other related adaptation planning areas.
SP-10 Work with appropriate local, regional and state authorities to revise building codes
and land development regulations to discourage new development or post-disaster
redevelopment in vulnerable areas to reduce future risk and economic losses associated
with sea level rise and flooding. In these areas, require vulnerability reduction
measures for all new construction, redevelopment and infrastructure such as additional
hardening, higher floor elevations or incorporation of natural infrastructure for
increased resilience.
SP-11 Identify within Adaptation Action Areas and similarly impacted areas populations and
communities most vulnerable or of special concern for the purpose of ensuring the
16 Region Respvnds t(i a C:hagirsp Ca`iraeate
proper consideration of individual needs and resources as part of local and regional
planning activities.
SP-12 Develop new community flood maps reflective of a 100-year storm event under
future sea level rise scenarios and use this information, in conjunction with
similarly updated storm surge models for revising required elevations for new and
redevelopment, and in the permitting/licensing of transportation projects, water
management systems, and public infrastructure.
SP-13 Designate or otherwise recognize "Restoration Areas" to identify undeveloped areas
that are vulnerable to climate change impacts for the purpose of environmental
restoration, dune restoration, agriculture, conservation of natural resources or
recreational open space, or as stormwater retention areas. Local governments and
appropriate regional planning authorities should prioritize land acquisition in these
areas. These areas could also be established or acquired through mitigation or
transfer-of-development rights initiatives.
SP-14 Designate or otherwise recognize "Growth Areas" as areas outside of Adaptation
Action Areas, or other areas subject to adaptation planning efforts, where growth
is encouraged due to higher topographic elevation and the presence of existing
infrastructure, such as transportation and water and sewer infrastructure. Growth
Areas should be developed with Urban Design guidelines that address character of
urban place and provide a high quality pedestrian experience through landscaping and
the creation of public space.
SP-15 Modify or develop new design standards for transportation infrastructure located in
identified vulnerable areas to include environmentally supportive road materials, bridge
design, elevation, and stormwater management. Include different pitches combined
with stormwater design to effectively remove water from the roadway; explore
roadway materials that may be utilized in road construction that are more tolerant of
extended periods of extreme temperatures.
SP-16 Develop policies to address new transportation infrastructure development in light
of anticipated future climate impacts, such as consideration of future floodplain
conditions and vulnerable areas which could require the rerouting of roads because of
potential flooding and related damage.
S'utrlSa .rPlarf�r Fctainaa<alC',l r<rt CFrrrtx':aaraG c <,`rrrra'ies 'erzcalt".lr`Fctt rtzrrt)'1Etr 7
SP-17 Analyze potential blighted sites and develop an approach for converting underutilized
or unused properties and structures, including properties in financial distress, into
community gardens or farmers' markets. (i.e., Redfields to Greenfields)
Transportation Planning
The transportation sector contributes 45 percent
0 � �,�,�N of the region's greenhouse gas emissions, with the
a f7°wti* ai'
,�0 majority of trips taken for family and personal
yl� i
purposes in single occupancy vehicles. Reducing
vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which reduces
® � WA
emissions, can be achieved by shifting trips taken
e
in the personal vehicle to walking, biking, and
public transportation, and shortening or avoiding
trips altogether through community design and
sustainable development strategies. Recent studies
demonstrate the significant impact this approach
can have on avoiding greenhouse gas emissions - estimating that the five "Ds" of compact
development — density, diversity, design, destination and distance to transit — are expected to
reduce VMT by 12 to 18 percent (Urban Land Institute). Clearly, the success of this reduction is
dependent on the extent and timing of implementation. While recommendations in this area call
for increased funding for mobility solutions that achieve a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
and also increase the livability and economic strength of the region by reducing our dependence
on the personal vehicle, others focus on more immediate strategic service improvements as well as
initiatives to attract individuals who could drive their cars but who choose to ride transit or share
a ride because of the conveniences and other benefits represented by these choices.
More than 100 entities in the four-county region, including municipalities, county and state
governments, metropolitan planning organizations, and regional planning bodies, exercise
governance over transportation planning, operation, and investment decisions. A continued and
expanded collaborative approach to these activities will be a cornerstone to implementing these
recommendations that not only serve to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but will realize cross-
cutting benefits of more livable and desirable communities within our region.
18 A Region Responds to a Changing Climate
SP-18 Identify means to effectively engage the multiple public and private sector
entities with roles and responsibilities involving the provision and maintenance of
transportation infrastructure and the delivery of transportation services in the region,
in climate adaptation and mitigation initiatives. Document current and evolving
coordination efforts among these entities.
SP-19 Focus transportation investments and service expansions on projects and strategies
contributing to greenhouse gas emissions reductions and enhancing resilience to
climate change.
a. Continue to enhance and implement regionally coordinated transportation
planning through the Regional Long Range Transportation Plan (RLRTP).
Identify goals and objectives in the RLRTP which, as they are attained, reinforce
the desired achievement of greenhouse gas emissions reductions and enhanced
resilience to climate change. Articulate the supportive role of these goals and
objectives for emissions reductions and climate resilience.
b. Give higher investment priority to and advocate for state and federal transportation
infrastructure investments, programs and services that will reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and enhance resilience and adaptability to climate change. Performance
standards for climate and related metrics, such as reduced VMT and increased
mode split, should be incorporated in transportation plans and programs.
Transportation planning should include performance measures' in major decision-
making phases such as land use visioning, long range transportation plans, corridor
studies, programming, environmental review, and performance monitoring.
c. Incorporate evaluation criteria and processes to prioritize projects that
meet RLRTP goals and objectives — into local and regional planning and
programming processes — with an initial emphasis on evaluation criteria that
reduce VMT and increase use of transportation modes other than the personal
vehicle. Projects that enhance economic vitality should also be given priority, such
as projects and service expansions along transit-oriented corridors and those that
improve connections to major airports and seaports.
d. Prioritize studies funded through existing programs and other sources addressing
effective climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, particularly those addressing
barriers to adaptation and assisting in integrating land use and transportation
planning.
Sra{?he rs P r efa E z ral C:/a'�re e C,6<an�r t:+aaa a�.�a"air i s Regiewal C lini le:�clion('
e. Improve coordination among economic development, land-use/housing,
transportation and water resource planning activities. Review local and regional
planning and decision making processes to ensure a complementary approach
toward developing and maintaining a transportation network, including for
purposes of reducing VMT and providing more transportation choices.
SP-20 Require that new development and redevelopment in areas with existing and planned
multimodal corridors that connect urban and other centers in the region be planned
and designed to support walking, biking and transit use.
SP-21 Support effective planning and implementation of transit oriented developments
(TODs)2, from both a local and regional scale, in coordination with effective
planning and delivery of transit services, particularly transit stations', to maximize
ridership.
a. Recognize that planning for TOD requires consideration of transit and land use
issues at the system, corridor and station levels, as well as evaluation of adequate
infrastructure such as water and sewer mains.
b. Develop policies to streamline approval processes involving TODs.
c. Ensure equitable distribution of the benefits of TOD and premium type transit
services.
SP-22 Introduce a new activity-based regional travel demand forecast model to directly
simulate individual trip making and mode choice behaviors. Simulations done using
the model will allow for robust tests of the effectiveness of policy alternatives.
SP-23 Consider regional implementation of rapid transit zones to maintain land use
control around a station with multiple jurisdictions. Modify local land use plans and
ordinances to support compact development patterns, creating more walkable and
affordable communities.
'One example of incorporating sustainable transportation performance measures into existing planning processes is:Environmental
Protection Agency's Guide to Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures(EPA 231-K-10-004,August 2071).
'Transit oriented developments(TODs)are compact moderate to high intensity and densitymixed use areas,within one-half mile of transit
stations,designed to maximize walking trips and access to transit.
'A transit station in this context means one serving a premium type of transit including commuter rail,light rail,express bus service such
as the 95 Express Bus,bus rapid transit service(as defined by the Federal Transit Authority),or a station that functions as a local bus hub or
transfer station,serving a minimum of three fixed routes operating with headways of21-30 minutes or less.
20 1 Re,;,,ion.l ecpr fir' c rr C.J czr fxirz ,irrz:t€
a. Identity potential future land use map and other
comprehensive plan changes at the local level. Also
address the subject in regional level plans.
�i it � ' J
l� ��llll� I����IiINVi INN
b. Adopt form-based codes that have physical form,
design of buildings and the public realm, and an
emphasis on mixed and evolving land uses as organizing principles.
c. Consider regional implementation of rapid transit zones or other such designations
to maintain land use control around
transit stations, including ones with
r
multiple jurisdictions.
SP-24 Consider the adoption of green
neighborhood certification programs,
such as LEED ND (Neighborhood
Development) to guide decision making
and development and to provide an incentive for better location, design, and
construction of new residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments with the
goal of increasing transportation choices while reducing household transportation costs.
Incorporate sustainable building and neighborhood ratings or national model green
building codes, including but not limited to those defined in Section 255.253(7),
Florida Statutes, into municipal codes region-wide.
SP-25 Adopt or create a green rating system for roads to reduce emissions from
construction, maintenance, and agency operations through practices such as using
recycled materials, purchasing materials found or manufactured sustainably in the
region, and requiring construction contractors to implement emissions reductions
practices such as using alternative fueled vehicles and clean diesel practices.
SP-26 Improve movement and safety for non-motorized modes through the adoption and
implementation of best practice models including Complete Streets.
a. Develop policy, ordinances, guidelines, models and projects to accelerate
implementation.
SoWbeart Florida Regional Climate Change Conpacf Counlies-Re
ional Climate Action Phil
b. Identify partners and resources to support training and the research into new
techniques for transportation design and other professionals.
SP-27 Complete, expand and connect networks of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including
supporting access to transit.
a. Prioritize implementation of planned bicycle and pedestrian networks. Improve
overall coordination of local and regional agency planning and implementation
efforts. Evaluate whether these facilities are connected regionally and on a local
scale to major employment, education, and recreation centers.
b. Implement a roadway design project checklist that includes measures of pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit (e.g. bus bay) accommodation.
c. Work regionally to improve
safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
d. Consider regional adoption
of Transit, Pedestrian, and
Biking programs that aim to ,11
improve access to transit. ��'
e. Develop policies to increase
designated bike parking
facilities at office and retail
developments.
SP-28 Continue to implement strategies aimed at maximizing the efficiency of the existing
transportation network by all agencies across the region. Many of these strategies
also result in greenhouse gas emissions reductions. There is a need for a toolbox of
successful strategies that can be duplicated across the region. Agencies should make
an effort to collect information that will allow for evaluation of the effectiveness of a
strategy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Information collected by implementing
agencies should include emissions reductions, fuel reductions, VMT impacts, or other
performance measures as appropriate. Information collected should also include steps
for implementation, costs, and lessons learned. Among the strategies to consider are
use of roundabouts, real time operation of the traffic signal system, traffic signal
prioritization and queue jumps for transit, interstate ramp metering, and employment
22 A Region Responds to a Changing Climate
of a virtual freight network (freight network managed in real time using intelligent
transportation systems).
SP-29 Increase transit ridership by providing premium transit service' on targeted regional
corridors. Examples of successful routes include the I-95 Express bus service and
"The Flyer" route from Miami International Airport to Miami Beach. The goal of
these routes is to bring people who might otherwise drive to work (known as "choice
riders") from residential areas to regional centers of employment. Agencies should
review levels of service policies and service standards and modify as necessary to
prioritize increasing services along corridors with dense land use. Improve quality of
service by continuing to monitor and address safety and performance.
SP-30 Increase the amenities and infrastructure available to transit riders, such as shade,
shelters, kiosks utilizing solar power when feasible, and route and real time boarding
information.
SP-31 Provide seamless transitions to increase the use of low carbon modes for the
movement of people and freight in the region.
a. Improve connections among Tri-Rail and county transit service, municipal trolley
and community shuttle bus services which may include realignment of routes.
District circulators, such as the Metro Mover in downtown Miami, which connects
to Metro Rail, provide the last leg of a commute for transit riders and should
have high frequency and ease of transfer.
b. Implement seamless regional transit fare and transfer media (traditional or virtual)
across transit services in the region while improving walking and biking access to
transit.
c. Develop planning strategies to address planning for the "First and Last Mile" of
transit trips, which act as barriers for commuters who could potentially take transit
but whose starting point or final destination cannot be conveniently accessed from
' The term premium transit service in this context means rail, express bus service, or the Federal Transit Authority definition of
Bus Rapid Transit service, which are routes predominantly on fixed guideways or high frequency bus service with the following
elements:substantial transit stations, traffic signal priority or preemption,low-floor vehicles or level platform boarding,and
separate branding of the service.Nigh-frequency service is defined as 10-minute peak and 15-minute off-peak headways for at
least 14 hours of service operations per day.
3"arut r ust Florida Etc911;ar�rl i.Itara rte C t�car r C;rr r j �t t.r�a�r€za I ge a>�al C,'Tf�ate.,Iction Ne n 23
the nearest transit stop/station due to distance, terrain (street patterns), or real or
perceived safety issues (traffic, crime).
d. Partner to implement a Virtual Freight Network as part of the region's
comprehensive Intelligent Transportation System/Transportation System
Management and Operations Programs. Establish a software application to provide
"load matching" for shippers and truckers to alleviate "deadheading" of empty
trucks traveling back to destination.
e. Incorporate climate adaptation strategies and greenhouse gas emissions inventories
into Seaport and Airport
Master Plans and Regional
Freight Plans. Plans should
.� �� tJ1( l; , ///,Sri ii ✓
address the critical last mile to 711�
and from major seaports and ��„
airports in part by providing J�J f� An
comprehensive plan land use
designations, policies, and
standards that protect that
function of roadway segments
connecting seaports and
airports (hubs) to corridors,
such as interstates.
£ Establish performance measures including VMT reduction and emissions reductions
monitoring for freight projects such as ship to rail projects which remove drayage
truck operations'.
g. Support clustering of distribution facilities to promote intermodal centers and
economic development.
s "Drayage truck operations'refer to truck container pickup from or delivery to a seaport terminal with both the trip origin and
destination in the some urban area.
24 A Region Rerpon&to a Changing Climate
SP-32 Use and expand Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, which
reduce peak hour and single-occupant vehicle travel.
a. Vanpool and Carpool Programs - Work with MPQs, South Florida Commuter
Services and South Florida Vanpool to identify and pursue opportunities to more
fully utilize and expand these programs.
b. Car and Bike Sharing Programs - Work with companies providing these services
and strategic partners (universities, municipalities, large employers, etc.) to establish
zip car, bike sharing and personal vehicle sharing programs.
c. Employee Benefits — Encourage sharing of information on and use of employee
benefits that support use of walking, biking and transit modes for work
commutes (e.g., pre-tax benefits and Emergency Ride Home program).
d. Commute Trip Reduction Programs - Local governments should promote
participation in programs such as the EPA Commuter Choice Program and
explore the adoption of commute trip reduction ordinances.
SP-33 Coordinate initiatives with those of the seven-county Southeast Florida Prosperity
Plan, known as Seven50, to maximize the opportunities presented as Seven50 is
developed (e.g., sharing data and analyses; participating in alternative future scenario
planning; engaging a myriad of public, private and civic partners) and actively engage
in Seven50 implementation efforts, designed to address the following Livability
Principles:
• Provide more transportation choices
• Promote equitable, affordable housing
• Enhance economic competitiveness
• Support existing communities
• Coordinate policies and leverage investment;
• Value communities and neighborhoods and
• Enhance community resilience to the impacts of Climate Change
r heart Nmida Eez real Climate Climale Chan ge
P.'uxa act C, �mes R qioul<, arGalt Alrr I'Tcs 5
Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure
g g
Climate change presents serious challenges for water managers with
impacts on the quality and abundance of water supplies, water and
wastewater infrastructure, and drainage and flood control operations.
An effective response will require the coordinated efforts of
governmental agencies and service providers and a holistic approach
that treats water supply, disposal and management as integrated
systems.
In Southeast Florida, climate change is predicted to influence
precipitation patterns with both water supply and water management
implications. Fewer storm events, drier winter and spring months,
rrr�'
and an increase in local evapotranspiration rates (water lost to the
atmosphere through evaporation and plant transpiration) will increase
the frequency and severity of droughts while less frequent but more
intense storms will tax water management systems causing both
inland and coastal flooding. Impacts will be compounded by sea
level rise with the loss of coastal wellfields due to saltwater intrusion
and constraints on water management operations due to increases in
groundwater levels and reduced discharge potential at canal water
control structures. Addressing the impacts of climate change will
require: finding solutions to consistently maintain high quality
and adequate water supplies for all local communities, strategies to
reduce the cost and energy demands of alternative water supplies,
consideration of future conditions with respect to the placement
of infrastructure, and investments in new and upgraded infrastructure to maintain essential
drainage and flood control operations. Additionally, SLR from climate change is threatening the
Florida Everglades, the backbone of our natural resource system, highlighting the urgent need for
restoration of the Everglades with improved delivery and distribution of water flow to provide
both natural resources and water supply benefits.
Given these challenges, it is essential to identify practical solutions today to help mitigate
the impact of climate change on our future water supply. The Regional Climate Action Plan
proposes recommendations to provide regionally coordinated water management plans that address
26 A Region Reiponds to a Changing Climate
stormwater use and disposal, traditional and alternative water supplies, wastewater disposal and
reuse, water conservation measures, and continued support for Everglades restoration efforts.
A unified effort among government, businesses, and consumers is needed to implement near-
term solutions and develop long-term strategies to mitigate adverse impacts of climate change
on water supplies while developing new sources that add diversity to our water supplies. Efforts
will require optimized use of all water resources, with conservation being paramount, along with
development of new sources less vulnerable to changing climate conditions. The challenge will be
to implement these necessary projects without marked increases in energy consumption, a difficulty
that underscores the value of conservation as a priority strategy. Policy and regulatory changes,
funding for infrastructure, development of alternative water supplies, and public education will all
be necessary in order to make significant progress. The issues are vast and the investments to be
great, with effective response requiring the collaboration of the public, financial participation of
state and federal governments, and the exploration of new finance strategies.
GI tt A fzor toonwgwooest 01"Magios and rant Pt t . ,, aodid to
f of Agow Atsoge and mw kvd A ww� Um
WS-1 Develop local and, where appropriate, regional inventories of existing potable
water supply delivery and collection systems, vulnerable wellfields, wastewater
collection and/or treatment infrastructure, septic tanks/drainfields, and stormwater
drainage and treatment facilities; assess the potential impact from climate change
of each component; and develop different climate change scenarios and adaptation
strategies for high-risk utilities and/or infrastructure which may require replacement,
reinforcement, or relocation to ensure the long-term viability of the system (e.g.,
modified site, depth, elevation, materials, or connection requirements).
WS-2 Develop a regional saltwater intrusion baseline and utilize saltwater intrusion models
to identify wellfields and underground infrastructure at risk of contamination/
infiltration by saltwater with increases in sea level.
WS-3 Utilize existing and refined inundation maps and stormwater management models to
identify areas and infrastructure at increased risk of flooding and tidal inundation
with increases in sea level, to be used as a basis for identifying and prioritizing
adaptation needs and strategies.
Sonthrast Florida Kegional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Ck'mate 19etio Plan 27
WS-4 Evaluate the impacts of rising
sea and groundwater levels on
soil storage, infiltration rates
and inflow to stormwater
and wastewater collection and
conveyance systems; consider
longer-term influences on
water quality and develop
strategies for implementing
reclaimed water and
stormwater reuse projects that account for current and future conditions.
WS-5 Develop and apply appropriate hydrologic and hydraulic models to further
evaluate the efficacy of existing water management systems and flood control/
drainage infrastructure under variable climate conditions. Quantify the capacity and
interconnectivity of the surface water control network and develop feasible adaptation
strategies.
WS-6 Coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District, Drainage/Water
Control Districts, and utilities/public works officials to identify flood control and
stormwater management infrastructure already operating below the design capacity.
Further examine water control structures to ensure that they can provide for inland
or upstream migration of riparian species as freshwater habitats become more saline.
WS-7 Develop Integrated Water Management Plans that present a joint assessment
and planning strategy involving local water utilities, wastewater service providers,
water managers, and partners to the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact, for coordinated consideration of stormwater use and disposal, traditional
and alternative water supplies, wastewater disposal and reuse, and water conservation
measures for use by local leadership to guide planning decisions as well as
amendments to applicable codes and regulations.
WS-8 Develop and test water management and drainage system adaptation improvements
needed to maintain existing levels of service relating to drainage, flood control, and
water supply, and use cost-benefit analyses to prioritize potential improvements.
28 A Region Responds to a Changiq Ckmate
WS-9 Incorporate and prioritize preferred climate adaptation improvement projects in capital
improvement plans and pursue funding.
WS-10 Encourage, foster, and support investigative work and scientific research that improves
the understanding of local and regional climate change impacts specific to Southeast
Florida, including:
• Improved down-scaling of global climate models for representation of
precipitation at the regional/local scales
• Identification and targeting of gaps in monitoring to improve
quantification of the hydrologic system and its response to climate
change, such as evapotranspiration, groundwater levels, and precipitation,
and local sea level
• Development of risk-based decision support tools and processes
for application in analysis of infrastructure design, water resource
management, natural systems management, and hazard mitigation
alternatives. Tools should provide for consideration of potential economic
costs of comparative planning scenarios, management decisions, and
infrastructure investments and the evaluation of potential tradeoffs.
W'S-11 Undertake efforts to fill identified data gaps through local program efforts, agency
collaborations, and advocacy for additional state/federal resources, as needed.
S-12 Foster the development and exchange of new information, methods and technical
capabilities to address key questions of concern related to climate variability and sea
level rise to support management decisions:
• Assess impacts of observed and predicted climate variability and sea level
rise on the frequency, duration, and intensity of flooding as a result of
extreme tidal excursions, storm surge, and 100-year storm events, and
where impacts are likely to be greatest.
• Examine the effects of climate change on water availability and
groundwater vulnerability due to sea level rise, and predicted changes in
precipitation and evapotranspiration patterns and rates.
• Establish a venue for a periodic exchange of ideas between resource
managers, policy makers, and researchers.
,Youllieasl I rCa<rr to .t irrar,a C"Z'' zcr e<,h x ge C.'race C:'olintie� . ��e�r n aI C A,,vale,�c?ion Plan
WS-13 Develop agency capabilities to
provide rapid deployment of resources ,
in immediate response to intense
precipitation and storm events through �r
use of Next RAD technology.
WS-14 Cultivate partnerships with federal
and state agencies and professional I
associations with expertise in integrated
water resource planning (such as the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Institute
for Water Resources, the United
States Geological Survey, and Water
Foundations) as sources of important research, reports, and information regarding
climate change, and efforts being undertaken in other communities.
WS-15 Monitor changes in rainfall patterns, temperature means and extremes and sea level
rise through coordination with NOAA and other key organizations/partners to better
predict future wet-season and dry-season rainfall. Monitor emerging science in order
to assess the adequacy of regional climate models. Choose an annual conference or
other venue at which such trends can be reviewed at regular intervals.
WS-16 Manage water storage in the region's publicly-owned uplands and wetlands and in
other land uses compatible with water storage, including wetland restoration, certain
agricultural operations and certain renewable energy production facilities. This will
further serve to protect high quality drinking water supply, increase aquifer recharge,
and as a means for managing saltwater intrusion.
WS-17 Support complete implementation and funding for the Comprehensive Everglades
Restoration Plan (CERP) and its updated versions as fundamental to Everglades
restoration, to include increased freshwater flows to the Everglades system, thereby
improving water quality, maximizing regional freshwater storage and aquifer recharge,
and providing potential to abate saltwater intrusion, which will become increasingly
important under variable climate conditions and in the face of sea level rise.
WS-18 Combine existing and develop new land acquisition priorities in a regional setting to
protect high quality drinking water supply.
30 ;1 kgon Responds to a Chat ggiq Curate
Natural Systems
Southeast Florida's natural communities exist within specific climate, water and salinity
regimes, coral reefs and seagrasses grow in clear, shallow seawater with abundant sunlight
and stable temperatures while mangroves thrive in the often brackish areas between the low
and high tide lines. Freshwater-dependent hardwood hammocks and pine rockland forests
support an abundance and diversity of rare plants and animals unrivaled in the United States.
Similarly, Everglades tree islands depend upon wet and dry seasonal rainfall patterns that
have existed for centuries. Climate change threatens many of the native plants and animals
important to Southeast Florida's culture, economy and distinctive sense of place.
Changing weather patterns are not new to the native flora and fauna of Southeast Florida.
Plants and animals are always living and competing on the edge of their limits. Wetland
plants gain ground, moving up the slope in wet years and perhaps losing that same ground in
dry years. But in many climate change scenarios, the speed and direction of such changes may
be unprecedented. Climate change may exceed the capacity of native species to keep pace.
By taking specific action now, we may be able to manage our native flora and fauna without
losing species diversity and without introducing potentially harmful species.
Coral reefs are vital to local fisheries and the economy. Healthy oceans provide most of the
oxygen in the air we breathe. Much research is already underway regarding the impact of
climate change on the world's oceans. Locally, strategies are being developed to maintain
our ocean in the face of climate change. In estuarine systems, mangroves and seagrasses
are primary converters of sunlight energy to food energy. However, they are both limited
� o
Sortthea t Floszda Regional Crenate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan
y
by water depth. As seas rise, they may not survive in their current locations. It will be
incumbent on us to ensure that newly inundated areas are available for them to colonize. The
fate of freshwater wetlands is currently harder to predict. Tide water may reach further inland
and some freshwater sources may become more brackish. These `lightly salty' estuaries can be
biologically healthy habitats but we must ensure that other land uses, including drinking water
supplies, are not threatened.
Most of the regions' freshwater wetlands and native uplands are supplied with rainwater. At
this time, no one knows exactly what changes in rainfall patterns are in store for us. What
we do know is that storage of freshwater is an important mitigation option whether rainfall is
too much or too little — or both. Having freshwater storage options allows us to collect flood
waters and hold them for later release during drought.
Given the opportunity, some species can adapt, migrate, or transition. Adaptation and
migration or transition, necessary for sustaining natural plant and animal communities, will
require careful and thoughtful planning. Land use planning and land acquisition programs
will have to allow for such transitions. Hardened shorelines may be transformed to living
shorelines. Open lands or vacant parcels may be suitable locations for habitat restoration.
The following strategies recommend ways in which all levels of government can share
information necessary to plan for and implement the maintenance of natural areas, rare and
endangered native species populations as well as the green industries necessary for our local
economy.
MAL: ) , l - , w" .and twworadsiaos Pimpowd k
nsee *Xs "d improsw dt acity, o dimote eldopwasion.
NS-1 Develop a vital signs status and trends monitoring program for biological
communities. Key parameters may include rate of sea level rise, saltwater intrusion
boundary and monitoring wells, landscape-level vegetation patterns, percent coral
cover and condition in offshore reef zones, water temperature and pH in areas, and
r� occurrence and range of invasive exotic plants and animal species.
32 A Region Reaponds to a CCangfng Climate
NS-2 Promote collaborative federal, state and local government conservation land acquisition
programs. Explore fee simple and less-than-fee approaches which reflect regional
acquisition priorities and result in conserving a diversity of natural areas including
hot spots of biological diversity, protecting open space and buffer areas to create or
maintain resilience and adaptive capacity of existing natural areas to transition inland/
upslope.
NS-3 Support regional fire management
�r
coordination efforts emphasizing frequent,
low intensity fire regimes in wetland and
pine forest systems to maximize habitat
quality, resilience to change and carbon 0', 1 ! ";/l%V
�i
neutrality while preventing hazardous fuel
load buildup that leads to major carbon
releases.
NS-4 Quantify monetary values of hazard
mitigation and adaptation provided by
natural systems using Ecosystem Services
Valuation or comparable model. Create a
sustainable funding mechanism for their protection and management.
NS-5 Maintain or restore multiple areas of habitat and large-scale connectivity to facilitate
native species population stability and habitat shifts resulting from climate change.
NS-6 Coordinate and implement regional invasive exotic species prevention and control
efforts to minimize the diversity and abundance of habitat-homogenizing exotic plants
and animals by emphasizing prevention of new invasions and early detection/rapid
response to nascent invasions.
NS-7 Coordinate "living shorelines" objectives at regional scale to foster use of natural
infrastructure (e.g. coral reefs, native vegetation and mangrove wetlands) instead of or
in addition to grey infrastructure (e.g. bulkheads).
NS-8 Leverage existing work of the Florida Reef Resilience Program's "Climate Change
Action Plan for Florida's Coral Reef System 2010-2015" for protection of marine
habitat.
Southeast Flo>t fa Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Ation Plan
NS-9 Engage and cooperate with marine resource agencies to
maintain coral reef (e.g., selective breeding) and mangrove
ecotones as estuarine habitat and natural barriers to storm
surge that also maintain coastal biodiversity.
NS-10 Advocate for federal and state funding for applied
monitoring and climate related science:
• identify economic and physical linkages between
marine systems (e.g. reefs and mangroves) and hazard
risk/damage claim reduction
• monitor coastal and freshwater marsh vegetation tolerance to changing salinity,
depth and other climate variables
• improve data on estuarine bathymetry and use appropriate models to help identify
habitats at risk
• develop refined climate projections, hydrologic and ecological models to aid in
planning
NS-11 Support regulatory requirements that provide for ecologically beneficial uses of clean,
dredged materials.
NS-12 Develop long-term turtle-nesting beach preservation and management strategies to
reduce nest vulnerability and mortality.
NS-13 Compile information on rare plant species in threatened natural communities and
develop adaptation plans that include, at a minimum, seed bank repository collection
and assisted propagation.
NS-14 Maintain/restore urban tree canopy.
34 A Re
ion Responds to a Changing Climate
Agriculture
Agriculture is consistently one of the three
economic drivers to Florida's economy. When they
economic impact of tourism, development and
agriculture are reviewed over many years, agriculture
tends to be the stabilizing component of the
economy.
Southeast Florida is unlike any other growing area
in the nation due to a 12-month growing season
and ample local market potential. More than 250
different and unique crops grow in Southeast
Florida. These crops supply the entire east coast of the United States with winter vegetables,
contributing to the food security of the nation. Many tropical and ethnic crops are also grown
and marketed to the diverse population of the region.
Farmers are actively adapting Best Management Practices that efficiently utilize nutrient application
(right time, right place) and conserve water resources. They are also evaluating alternative methods
to utilize and retain water when it's not harmful to current or projected growing practices.
The agriculture community is committed to sustainability, and the economic viability of regional
agriculture will allow farmers to remain on the land to grow food, fuel and fiber for area residents
as well as the nation. Consideration of agricultural impacts is vital to any regional action plan
which should include action plans to address flooding, salt-water intrusion, exotic pests and disease
introduction and crop changes due to climate change.
owtaimah, , Ovdwsio# do ( dhowzv&
AG-1 Promote policies which preserve the economic viability of agriculture as the industry adapts
in the face of climate change.
AG-2 Develop and seek regional, state, and county-based funding for willing buyer/willing seller
Agriculture Purchase of Development Rights Program to maintain agricultural land for its
Southeast Flo ida Regional"Iwate Change Compact Coy+ntie.-Regional Climate Actzon Phm 35
ability to lessen climate change impacts and
�J;�PuONG�lrXs � "JI
provide for national food security. "
d,
r
AG-3 Support academic research in the agriculture
war
sector on best management practices for crops
presently grown or new crops which may ,
be grown as climate conditions change in
Southeast Florida. r •,'
AG-4 Provide incentives to growers/land owners to
manage agricultural lands to lessen impacts
of climate change regionally and provide
environmental benefits (which may include,
but not be limited to: open space, water aquifer recharge and storage, carbon sequestration,
wind farms, biofuels, and wildlife habitat).
AG-5 Ensure availability of water supply, at reasonable cost, to meet the diversity of needs across
Southeast Florida to include agricultural irrigation needs and crop freeze protection.
AG-6 Identify and reduce obstacles for permitting agricultural practices (including growing
and selling produce) in urban areas, in order to encourage urban farming and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions related to the transport of farm produce.
Energy and Fuel
The vast majority of the energy consumed in the region is to fuel our vehicles and to generate
electricity for our buildings. It is widely understood that the most accessible and cost-effective way
to reduce energy consumption is through efficiency and conservation. The recommendations in
this area address these important strategies and also take the next step by encouraging the use of
alternative and renewable energy. They call for public-private partnerships and addressing barriers,
including regulatory processes, which currently prevent the broad application of these technologies.
Recommendations are comprehensive, ranging from setting regional goals, increasing renewable
energy capacity to establishing a regional framework to deliver finance options. Recommendations
also aim to reduce idling and prepare our region for the shift to plug-in electric vehicles.
(�"'(X 1 0 rrr mWwWWbAt OwerVrwsxprei; nd owduce arr rr mpti rr rr eirm one!fimet
36 A Region Rrspondr to a Changing Climate
EF-1 Undertake regional efforts to advance energy '��
�r
efficiencies, energy conservation and the
� 6uiuy „�� mull
,ul�lyri� uuy Uh
deployment of alternative and/or renewable
energy technologies in existing and proposed11
� l
developments through local ordinance, incentives, �
education, and energyefficiency financing
cY g
strategies.
EF-2 Work toward the establishment of a regional
framework to deliver Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy finance options, in addition
to other local government initiatives and partnerships, to achieve regional greenhouse
gas emissions reductions, the use of alternative and renewable energy technologies, in
furtherance of green sector economic development.
EF-3 Set a recurring five—year regional goal to increase renewable energy capacity and
conservation — which includes the co-benefits of economic development and job
creation — through revising building and zoning codes and architectural design
guidelines to allow for, encourage, and integrate renewable energy sources into the
power supply.
EF-4 Seek amendments to existing land development regulations and development standards
and revise or eliminate provisions that act as a barrier to the installation and use of
renewable energy systems pursuant to Section 163.04, F.S.
EF-5 Develop policies to facilitate and
streamline the deployment of
energy efficient and renewable
J
s
energy such as the installation
r , d
of LEDs and use of solar
power for public infrastructure
such as street lighting 'ti
parks, and parking facilities.
rA %;
Survey counties, cities and
regional agencies with lighting
infrastructure to determine the
Southeast Florzdu Regional Cbmate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan 37
level of deployment and to gather best practice policies and implementation steps
to facilitate the application of efficient, environmentally sensitive (sea turtles), and
responsive lighting practices in additional infrastructure.
EF-6 Support or facilitate development and distribution of local sources of sustainable fuels
and availability of fueling infrastructure. Adopt policies to facilitate the development
of locally sourced sustainable alternative fuels, those achieving a reduction in lifecycle
greenhouse gas emissions when compared to conventional fossil fuels (including, but
not limited to, waste-based bio-diesel and methane gas from sources like landfills).
Include these policies in regional plans and Local Comprehensive Plans. Identify
incentives and modify local code to encourage the establishment of a local alternative
energy industry.
EF-7 Establish a working group of public and private stakeholders to develop a strategy to
promote the use of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the region.
a. Establish locations where infrastructure and/or battery switching stations are
needed. Solar charging and other renewable options should be designated a
priority to maximize emission reduction benefits and to improve the community's
emergency management preparedness in times of power outages.
b. Develop policies to provide incentives for the deployment of infrastructure to
complement transit oriented corridors. Preferred and/or reduced parking fees
should be a consideration for riders accessing transit facilities by electric or other
alternative fuel vehicles. Transit facilities should develop plans to establish electric
vehicle charging infrastructure.
c. Work with relevant stakeholders to streamline permitting processes associated with
charging equipment to encourage the safe and expeditious installation on customer
premises and elsewhere.
d. Coordinate monetary and non-monetary incentives available to the general public
and organizations purchasing electric vehicles.
e. Support regional efforts to establish a framework for siting/locating public electric
vehicle charging stations.
EF-8 Develop a strategy to promote the development of truck parking with electrification
facilities and the use of auxiliary power units to reduce extended idling by trucks.
8 A Re n SiE}.�,a on rs to a C:r aars ast Climate
a. Survey state, local and regional transportation agencies for existing studies
identifying trucking patterns and needs.
b. Identify strategic locations for truck parking facilities and seek competitive funding
opportunities as a region.
Risk Reduction and Emergency Management
The recommendations presented in this section of the Southeast
Florida Regional Climate Action Plan provide a foundation for
establishing a more predictable physical environment in the face
of climate thane through regulations, adaptation strategies, and
g g g P g
emergency operations, with the goal of reducing future economic
g cY P g g
losses and threats to public safety. Southeast Florida is no stranger
to the devastating effects of hurricanes and other severe weather.
Our experience has made us experts in planning, preparedness,
response, mitigation, and recovery. Our emergency managers are
trained in an all risk-based, all hazards approach. Disaster can strike
anytime, anywhere. It takes many forms — a hurricane, a tornado,
a flood, a fire or a hazardous spill, an act of nature or an act of
terrorism. In fact, in the aftermath of September 11, homeland
security preparedness was easily incorporated into Southeast Florida's
all hazards approach to emergency management. An emergency can build over days or weeks, or
hit suddenly, without warning. Southeast Floridians are resilient and accustomed to this and can
mitigate, prepare, respond, recover, and return to better than normal.
Climate change differs, however, with impacts that may not be immediately evident as the
changing conditions are slower and occur over longer time scales. With climate change there is no
overnight return to "normal." Sea level rise does not
appear on the on 6 o'clockP moving
news weather ma
PPg G�
towards the coast of Florida. It is that difference
that makes it more difficult for the general public to
understand and to react to climate change. Yet we are
already experiencing more extreme weather conditions
— from extreme rain to extreme droughts, from
unseasonable heat waves to early cold fronts. Climate
Southeast Florida Regional C/rmate Cbangr Conrj>act Corrntie -Kcgional Clmate Action Plun 39
is changing. Adapting and planning for more and possibly new weather-related threats need to be
incorporated into preparedness procedures, and one step further is to include climate change in our
emergency preparedness and hazard mitigation plans.
The collection of strategies and actions in this area is aimed at integrating climate change risk into
all-hazards emergency management planning and response models. This approach provides support
for the objectives of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 which recognizes sea level rise
as a threat to coastal communities and encourages strategies for improved protection of life and
property, and builds upon requirements of Section 163.3178 and Chapter 252 F.S. relating to
coastal and emergency management plans.
GCW,r Poo" 4 owtv roh%ow ssawdand build Off
RR-1 Perform vulnerability analysis to identify and quantify the economic value of regional
infrastructure at risk under various sea level rise scenarios and other climate change
scenarios utilizing inundation mapping, modeling, and other appropriate tools. While
the initial regional vulnerability assessment completed by the Compact Counties for
use in this Regional Climate Action Plan has yielded important new insights on
regional risk, additional and ongoing analysis is required to further refine our current
understanding and to monitor changes in Southeast Florida's risk profile over time.
RR-2 Evaluate and improve adaptation responses for communities at risk, to include:
• Development and implementation of methodologies for the assessment and
evaluation of evacuation and relocation options
• Development of model evacuation policies and procedures for communities at
increased risk of flooding
• Development of model relocation policies for affected communities.
RR-3 Incorporate climate change adaptation into the relevant Local Mitigation Strategy
(LMS) to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from
disasters. Within the LMS, update local risk assessments to include climate change in
the hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment section. Develop strategies for hazard
mitigation and post-disaster redevelopment planning.
40 A Region Rupond to a Changing Climate
RR-4 Identify transportation infrastructure at risk from climate change in the region, and
determine whether, when, where, and to whom projected impacts from climate change
might be significant. Employ inundation mapping, modeling and other appropriate
tools to assess the vulnerability of transportation infrastructure to the projected impacts
of climate change under various sea level rise and other climate change scenarios. At a
minimum, assess the vulnerability of the following transportation infrastructure:
• local transportation networks of the Compact Counties
• the Regional Transportation Network designated by the Southeast Florida
Transportation Council composed of interconnected, strategic corridors (roadway,
rail line, waterway), hubs (airports, seaports, intermodal terminals, freight terminals,
passenger rail and intercity bus pn,�r ����Y;��a�YY�Yr�U��ooro��o����H ���, ���,,,����,�����VO,
SAP
terminals) and connectors critical
to the mobility of people and
freight and the region's economic
competitiveness and quality of life
(map included in Appendix D);
and evacuation routes adopted
under the Statewide Regional
Evacuation Corridor Program.
RR-5 Enforce Coastal Construction Control Line and build upon goals, objectives and
policies related to Coastal High Hazard Area designations in Comprehensive Plans.
RR-6 Adopt consistent plans at all levels of regional government that adequately address and
integrate mitigation, sea level rise and climate change adaptation. The following plans
must all be consistent: disaster recovery and redevelopment plans, comprehensive plans,
long-range transportation Plans, comprehensive emergency management plans, capital
improvement plans, economic development plans, Local Mitigation Strategy, Climate
Change Action Plan, and Future Land Use Plan.
RR-7 Continue to implement and enforce strong building codes that require new
construction and substantial improvements to existing structures to mitigate against the
impacts of flooding, severe winds, and sea level rise, and which are consistent with
Climate Change Adaptation policy.
Southeast Flosicla Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climale,-lslzon Pkin 41
Outreach and Public Policy
Outreach and Public Policy recommendations are combined in recognition of the fact that the
best planning efforts in the world will not be implemented or reach their fiill potential without
the support of the public, often through local government public outreach programs, and without
the leadership of local, state and federal policy makers and private sector decision makers who are
committed to a sustainable planet.
Public Outreach
Today's world is marked by instant communication, immediate information and multitasking
behaviors. News and information related to climate change is difficult to communicate in a sound
bite. It's relatively easy to communicate the threat of an imminent storm, tornado or other natural
disaster, but much more difficult to mobilize the public to hazards that unfold over years and
decades. The state of the current economy also makes a long-term discussion on climate change
more difficult when many Americans are thinking about short-term housing, employment and
other immediate needs. And, of course, the science of climate change is still contested by some.
The strategies and actions in this area aim to educate stakeholders in all sectors and at all levels
— from the general public and voters to elected officials, professionals and other decision makers.
These are initiatives to inform and create a common understanding of the benefits of energy
independence, energy use reduction, water conservation, smart growth, and natural area protection
that will create demand for a healthy, sustainable and resilient region.
(ML:'Oormst Aw A& oviated to dimato change and Ali Pod orpling polioArs
#W ; ow-hirow, n4liewtv, di our dM
PO-I Provide outreach to residents, stakeholders and elected officials on the importance
of addressing climate change adaptation and preparedness and develop a program to
educate specific interest groups about the Compact, Regional Climate Action Plan,
and the benefits of Adaptation Action Area. Consider utilizing the Academy concept
to educate elected leaders, academic interests and other decision makers.
PO-2 Collaborate among counties, municipalities and appropriate agencies to develop and
carry out outreach/educational programs to increase public awareness about hazards
42 A Region Responds to a Cbanging Climate
exacerbated b climate change, mitigation efforts and
Y
,
adaptation strategies to minimize damage and risk
associated with climate change.
PO-3 Provide education and improve communications on �� w h
energy conservation and available technologies with
a focus on both short-term and life-cycle economic
benefits, and incentives available within the region.
PO-4 Modify existing and encourage new public outreach,
education and messaging programs associated with natural areas including upland,
wetland, marine, coastal and nearshore environments and the Everglades to include
climate change mitigation and adaptation messaging and volunteer opportunities to
create awareness about the impacts of climate change on the environment.
PO-5 Initiate a regional public education campaign to educate residents, business owners,
and policy makers on the merits of preserving open land as an "insurance policy"
for adaptation to sea level rise in Southeast Florida.
PO-6 Develop early warning systems and social media applications to both inform residents
and visitors of extreme high-tide events and to raise overall awareness on sea level
rise and climate change issues. Also consider roadway signage for tidal flooding
zones.
PO-7 Leverage resources for campaign
s
and promotional advertisements
P
by coordinating public t J�
transportation messaging in the
region to attract non-transit-
dependent (choice) riders.
Messages should focus on
" ' y / !
making riding transit cool. � � ���;
PO-8 Deploy social media applications, to facilitate use of transit including access to real-
time information such as arrival times.
PO-9 Develop strategies to promote fuel efficient driving habits, including anti-idling
practices, and to raise awareness of rules and safety practices for sharing the road
Sozrtheart Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Action Plan 43
with bicyclists and pedestrians. Conduct best practice research on existing campaigns
and look for opportunities to integrate tools into existing high school, county and
municipal driver education courses, traffic school curriculum, truck driver training,
and fleet associations. Also include messaging on the benefits of purchasing fuel
efficient vehicles.
PO-10 Coordinate outreach efforts with states, regions and counties that are subject to the
impacts of climate change with special emphasis on coastal entities experiencing sea
level rise and coastal flooding to create a national Climate Adaptation Coalition for
the purpose of impacting public policy and influencing appropriations requests.
PO-II Create a working group to expand marketing efforts such as Redland Raised to
promote local organic and sustainable agriculture and economy by connecting farmers
with local users such as restaurants, grocers, and farmers markets and encourage
the establishment of farm-to-school initiatives and community supported agriculture
programs.
Public Policy
Public policy development and advocacy are core components of the Compact and commitments
that the Compact partners have fulfilled. Recent amendments to Florida law that provide for
i i A i A i Ada taton Action Area designation �t°'" � V
P g � r „� ���,'�H��ll�'-, ' ��`IiV��;'�rr� � %f ° a
' GJ i �
for areas vulnerable to the impacts of
P, 1
climate change, and the subsequent
request b members of Congress to
q Y g
amend federal law to mirror this !���///�
action are lust a few examples of �
the Compact's success to influence
t
policies. The Regional Climate Action
r,
Plan provides the next step to gain
support for ordinances, regulations
and state and federal policies on
behalf of the region. The Public
Policy goal complements numerous
other recommendations noted in
the Sustainable Communities and
Transportation Planning sections of this Plan.
44 A Region Responds to a Changing Curate
Additionally, the continuation of regional efforts to influence public policy is key to ensure that
state and national policies considered during these uncertain times do not impede regional efforts
already underway. Compact successes to date can easily be undermined without vigilance in
monitoring policy developments on all levels of government.
11 "diobw A , O�
PP-1 Compact Partners will continue the support for the core Compact policies and the
role of joint advocacy as provided for in Sections 1 — 4 of the Compact calling for
changes to federal law that better recognize the unique vulnerabilities of Southeast
Florida to climate change and for providing appropriations based on vulnerabilities,
with special attention to funding infrastructure projects to adapt to sea level rise.
PP-2 Compact partners will continue to develop state and federal legislative programs on a
yearly basis that will serve as guidance for advocacy in Tallahassee and Washington,
D.C. Regional programs will be considered for inclusion into Compact partners'
legislative packages and joint advocacy in Tallahassee and Washington, D.C., is
encouraged when appropriate.
PP-3 Continue to seek the support of other municipal and county jurisdictions including
the Leagues of Cities, Florida Association of Counties (FAC), etc. within Florida
and the National Association of Counties (NACo) and other entities that influence
national policy for the purpose of building coalitions, sharing resources, and
influencing state and national policy on mutual climate related issues through joint
advocacy.
PP-4 Counties, municipalities, regional agencies and other appropriate government and
private sector partners should integrate consideration of climate change impacts and
adaptation strategies into existing and future systemwide planning, operations, policies,
and programs. The guiding principles developed by the Interagency Task Force on
Climate Change Adaptation for federal agencies should be incorporated by entities
when designing and implementing adaptation strategies:
6(opalwww.fedcentergov/Zroaroms/climatelouidinanrincipfes/)
Southeast Florida Regioaal CGra z!e Change Conr�act Counties-Kegional CG,nale A-tion flan 45
• Prioritize the most vulnerable
I
• Use best-available science
Oentitk� that
Build strop partnerships
s P
• Apply risk-management methods and tools
• Apply ecosystem-based approaches
• Maximize mutual benefits
• Continuously evaluate performance
PP-5 Advocate for new authorization of the federal surface transportation programs with
increased priority for funding public transit and non-motorized travel and integrated
regional and local planning as means to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from
the transportation sector. Such a federal program should explicitly incorporate climate
change and shift priorities toward programs that encourage reinvestment in existing
infrastructure and communities ("fix-it-first" programs), support public transportation
and transit-oriented development, and address congestion management through means
other than new road building.
PP-6 Support federal actions to reform transportation models and enhance the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes to integrate climate change analysis.
The essential purpose of NEPA is to ensure that environmental factors are weighted
equally when compared to other factors in the decision making process. NEPA
processes are central to highway and transit project investment analysis.
PP-7 Advocate for stronger Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards and other
initiatives to promote clean fuel alternatives and encourage more stringent vehicle
emission standards in recognition of the value of these initiatives to mitigate the
impacts of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
PP-8 Support and advocate for continued implementation and funding on the state
and federal levels for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) in
recognition of the important role of CERP in climate adaptation planning and local
water resource management related to regional water storage and aquifer recharge,
important under variable climate conditions and sea level rise.
PP-9 Advocate to interests in Tallahassee for the preservation of the authority and
resource capacity of the Water Management Districts in support of their continued
46 A %gion Responds to a Changing Climate
participation in integrated water resource planning,
particularly in Southeast Florida where climate change and
and sea level rise pose additional challenges to the
complex issues of alternative water supply development,
Everglades restoration, salt water abatement, and
drainage and flood control operations.
PP-10 Encourage federal support for research and investigations
of potential energy efficiencies in pumping and water
treatment processes necessary for meeting energy
reduction goals concurrent with a growing reliance on pumps and advanced treatment
technologies for drainage and flood control, water production and wastewater
operations.
PP-11 Urge Congress to provide recognition of an "Adaptation Action Area" designation
in federal law for the purpose of prioritizing funding for infrastructure needs and
adaptation planning, with special attention to modifications in law that enhance
funding opportunities through USACE and EPA appropriations processes, as requested
by members of Congress.
PP-12 Urge Congress to pass legislation that would create a permanent funding source
to finance infrastructure projects to adapt to the impacts of climate change with
emphasis on investments in areas such as water management, water supply,
transportation and other projects that serve to reduce risks to urban infrastructure
from extreme weather events and rising sea
levels.
PP-13 Urge Congress to pass legislation that removes
federal barriers posed by the Federal Housing
Finance Agency to Property Assessed Clean
Energy (PACE) residential initiatives that
are intended to assist property owners to ,�
r
I'
finance energy efficiency and renewable energy a
improvements.
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regional Climate Aetion Plan 47
VIL Conclusions
This Regional Climate Action Plan provides the initial framework for an ongoing regional
commitment to building resilience and sustainability as cornerstones of Southeast Florida's regional
economic, social and ecological system. The five-year scope of this document is indicative of the
fact that this is the beginning rather than the end of the Regional Compact process. The Compact
Counties recognize that a given document is less important than the ongoing collaborative process
of assessing progress over time, developing new policies and collaborations among the public,
private and nonprofit sectors to adjust accordingly and incorporating new knowledge provided by
ongoing scientific endeavors. While much can be learned about sustainability and resilience from
past experience, new technologies, changes in the regional economy and changes in the historical
climatic conditions within Southeast Florida require active learning over the decades to come. The
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact has developed the institutional capacity to
enable the collaborative learning required to meet these challenges over time.
The Significance of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Compact
While providing direct benefits to the region, the Compact has provided a national model for
state and federal agency engagement with local government around the specific issues of place.
As the Compact is led by local government and further, as the Compact represents a significant
aggregation of effort by four counties containing over 100 municipalities, it has become a highly
efficient mechanism for state and federal agency engagement in the local process. Since its
adoption in early 2010, the Compact has received extensive technical support from NOAA, the
United States Geological Survey, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, EPA Region IV as well as
the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and
the South Florida Water Management District.
'a
�/.
The regional scale of the Compact has enabled ��
participants to develop resilience strategies
that effectively integrate human and natural
systems. The Regional Climate Action Plan
has effectively connected resilience efforts '�
within the urban core of Southeast Florida
with broader ecosystem scale efforts including '
48 A Region Reran*to a Changing Ckmate
comprehensive Everglades restoration, protection of the Southeast
Florida coral reef tract, and regionally important threatened and
i
endangered species and habitats. The ecosystem services provided
to the human settlements of the region are evident in the nature
of projected vulnerabilities such as salt water intrusion into local
drinking water supplies and the increased exposure to storm
surge impacts associated with the loss of natural barriers. And the
strategies developed to enhance environmental and habitat quality
fully recognize the benefits these strategies will have for the ongoing
livability of the region.
The Compact has enjoyed stable, bipartisan political support since its initiation in 2009 despite
the swings in the political salience of global climate change observed over this time in state and
federal political dynamics. This stability has remained despite the departure of early champions of
the Regional Compact from County Commission seats and a change of administration within one
of the four Compact Counties. The scope and extent of regional engagement made possible by the
Regional Compact has served to foster on-going bipartisan support as the Compact continues to
enjoy strong political leadership from each of the Compact Counties.
As an ongoing collaboration, the Compact provides a formal framework for policy development,
implementation and evaluation that is so critical to enable learning over time. Implementation
of this Regional Climate Action Plan will require the active participation of many actors, not
least of which are the many municipalities within the four county region who have primacy
in many cases for the decisions that will determine the shape of Southeast Florida in the years
to come. The Regional Compact process has benefited greatly from the active participation of
municipal representatives who have contributed much perspective and many insights thus far. As
implementation progresses, this ongoing collaboration will be all the more critical for success.
Next Steps
The release of this Regional Climate Action Plan is the first of several subsequent steps to follow
in the Regional Compact process. The following provides an overview of these subsequent next
steps:
Southeast Florida Regional Camate Change Compact Counties-Regozal Climate Action Plan 49
• Upon completion of the final Regional Climate Action
Plan, the Compact Staff Steering Committee will
P g
transmit the final plan to the four Boards of County
Commissioners for the acceptance and/or approval of the
final recommendations.
• The Compact Counties will continue development of a set
of progress indicators for use in monitoring and evaluating
the impact of implemented recommendations in building
resilience and sustainability in Southeast Florida.
• The Compact Counties will continue to collaborate with
the Southeast Florida Regional Sustainable Communities
Initiative funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development in addressing a wide range of sustainability and livability considerations
for Southeast Florida. The Compact Counties will continue to collaborate with the
Southeast Florida Regional Partnership in addressing a wide range of sustainability and
livability considerations for the region, including through development and implementation
of the Seven50 Regional Vision and Blueprint for Economic Prosperity.
• Annually, the Compact Policy Coordination Team will continue the Compact energy and
climate policy coordination process for state and federal legislation and will continue to
monitor legislative developments in both levels of government.
• In early 2013, the Sea Level Rise Projection Technical Advisory Committee will reconvene
following the December 31, 2012 publication deadline for peer-reviewed scientific literature
to be used in the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change due in 2014. Members of the technical advisory committee have advised that they
anticipate many new publications in 2012 that will have significant bearing on mid- to
longer-terms rates of sea level rise as an issue of concern for Southeast Florida. At that
time, the technical committee will provide regionally consistent sea level rise projections for
use in the Compact process through 2100 while adjusting guidance provided for 2030 and
2060 as warranted by the science.
This first Regional Climate Action Plan recommends several first steps toward reducing emissions
and building resilience to climatic impacts across Southeast Florida, but it isn't the final outcome
of the Compact. Compact participants have the opportunity to learn from early implementation:
what works and what doesn't, what are the implications of new science, and what are the
50 A Region Rerponds to a Changing Climate
i
�I I
N"'G
r'
0
� G / I� wMWtlpf f dr
implications of changes in state and federal policy. Over the next few months, the Compact
Counties will continue working with the Coastal Services Center at NOAA to develop a set of
performance indicators for use in monitoring and evaluating progress made in implementing this
first Regional Climate Action Plan. By implementing an ongoing set of performance metrics for
this Regional Plan and by remaining engaged with leading practitioners of science and public
policy, the Compact will be well positioned to capitalize on success, learn from challenges, and
produce subsequent future iterations of this Regional Climate Action Plan as a means to securing
a more prosperous Southeast Florida.
join us on this journey and visit our website for more information, source documents and to view
the Implementation Guide: southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org,
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Conn act Counties-Regrotial Climate Action Plan 51
Appendices
Appendix A-Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
r �
BK*(ffN, )ARD
t
COUNTY
Regional Climate
MIA LEADERSHIP SUlvmIT �.
AioRY�
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
WHEREAS, there is consensus among the world's leading scientists that global
climate change is among the most significant problems facing the world today; and
WHEREAS, Florida is considered one of the most vulnerable areas in the country to
the consequences of climate change with Southeast Florida on the front line to experience
the impacts of climate change, especially sea level rise; and
WHEREAS, Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Monroe Counties, herein the
four counties that constitute the Southeast Florida Region, share in common a strong quality
of life rooted in the region's rich cultural heritage, vigorous economy, and environmental
resources of global significance; and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned four counties of Southeast Florida, which represent
approximately 30% of the population of the State of Florida, are physically linked one to the
other by the Atlantic Ocean coastline and share some of the world's most renowned natural
resources such as the Everglades, our unique coral reefs, beautiful beaches, and fragile Keys
ecosystem; and
WHEREAS, the four counties of Southeast Florida and their respective populations,
totaling more than five million residents, are expected to share in disproportionately high
risks associated with climate change due to low land elevations, rising sea level projections,
and anticipated increases in tropical storm events; and
WHEREAS, rising sea levels could limit the effectiveness of critical drainage
infrastructure, endanger beaches, and coastal natural resources and increase incidents of
saltwater intrusion on the Biscayne Aquifer—putting at risk the drinking water supply for the
entire population of Southeast Florida; and
WHEREAS, local governments, and the region as a whole, must give significant
consideration to adaptation strategies designed to protect public infrastructure, property,
water resources, natural areas and native species, and basic quality of life; and
A-1 4 Region Responds to a Changing Climate
WHEREAS, the aforementioned four counties of Southeast Florida account for a
combined. Gross Domestic Product of more than $2.5 billion annually and more than 37% of
statewide economic output; and
WHEREAS, while the four counties of Southeast Florida have independently taken.
steps to address global climate change, all parties recognize that coordinated and collective
action on this, the defining issue for Southeast Florida in the 21,T Century, will best serve the
citizens of the region;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARDS OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE FOUR COUNTIES OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That each county shall work in close collaboration with the aforementioned
counties of Southeast Florida party to this compact to develop a joint policy position urging
the United States Congress to pass legislation that recognizes the unique vulnerabilities of
Southeast Florida to the impacts of climate change and to further a joint policy position that
includes specific recommendations regarding the allocation of federal climate change funding
based on vulnerability to climate change impacts. Such recommendations might include
designation of areas of Southeast Florida as uniquely vulnerable and of federal interest for the
purpose of securing enhanced levels of federal participation in regional adaptation projects.
SECTION 2: That each county shall work in close collaboration with the other
counties party to this compact to develop additional legislative policy statements relating to
global climate change and future legislation to be considered by the Congress of the United
States for transmittal to the Congressional Delegation representing, in part or in whole,
districts within the area covered by this compact.
SECTION 3: That each county shall work in close collaboration with other counties
party to this compact in developing joint position statements on proposed State legislation
and energy/climate policies including but not limited to issues such as the region's energy and
climate security and a renewable energy portfolio standard that defines renewable energy
sources as wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, qualified hydropower, and marine
and hydrokinetic energy, and also including nuclear energy, and to collaborate on other
emerging energy/climate issues that may be considered by the 2010 Florida Legislature for
transmittal to the Legislative Delegation representing, in part or in whole, districts within the
area covered by this compact.
SECTION 4: That each county shall work with other counties party to this compact
in developing joint position statements for future State legislation that may be considered by
the Florida Legislature for transmittal to the Legislative Delegation representing, in part or in
whole, districts within the area covered by this compact.
SECTION 5: That each county shall commit appropriate staff resources and expertise,
within budget constraints, to participate in a Regional Climate Team with other counties party
to this compact toward the development of a Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Action Plan,
SECTION 6: That each county shall work with other counties party to this compact
in developing a Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Action Plan, understanding that
no county will work at cross-purposes with the other counties. The Action Plan could, at a
minitnurn, include the following components:
Soulhe a.a,Noriek IZraVonal C:kazate C"0mpact C outilifu-Reaicaal C.' araale,-Jction Plan -A-2
(a) A baseline of greenhouse gas emissions for Southeast Florida;
(b) Strategies for coordinated emission reductions throughout the built environment to
include the use of energy efficiency, energy conservation, and the use of demand-
side renewable energy resources;
(c) Strategies for coordinated emission reductions from the transportation sector to
include increased reliance on public transit, emerging vehicle technologies, and
advanced biofuels;
(d) Strategies for coordinated emission reductions resulting from changes in local and
regional land use;
(e) Strategies for the coordinated regional preparation for and adaptation to a rapidly
changing global environment based upon regional mapping of projected sea-level
rise and any resulting amplification of localized impacts of tropical cyclone events.
Such strategies shall incorporate climate preparation concerns for the regional
economy, regional infrastructure and the built environment, social and cultural
needs, and natural systems within the four counties party to this compact.
SECTION7:That each countyshall committo participating with other counties partytothis
compact in hostingthe Second SoutheastFlorida Regional Climate Change Summit in October,2010.
BW,,(t'-A,, jARDAdopted December 8, 2009
COUNTY
MIAMF Adopted December 1, 2009
Adopted January 20, 20101*
#R1
Adopted December 15, 2009
*City of Key West: Resolution of support for the Compact—December 15, 2009
'Second adoption date following minor changes made by partnering Counties
A-3 A Region Rerponds to a Changing Climate
Appendix B-Work Group Recommendations
The recommendations put forth in the Regional Climate Action Plan were developed through
a collaborative process involving nearlvYOO subject matter experts from 8 host of professions
representing the public and private sectors, area universities, and not-for-profit organizations.
These stakeholders brought to the table the knowledge of their"cn3ft"es well 8o information On
successful initiatives already underway locally or in other communities.
Many of the recommendations build upon best practices sprinkled throughout our region, such
as regional Co&3b0n3tinnoDtrenapOrt8bonp/enn/Dg8Dd/8ndUGgcriberie&h8t foster walkable
and healthy communities. Others delve into "new"frontiers in calling for the integration of climate
change into planning and decision-making processes/n ways that n0 local government has yet
implemented.
Below are the full set of recommendations, organized as focal areas and strategies, offered by
each of the three working groups: Built Environment Working Group, Land and Natural Systems
Working Group, and the Transportation Working Group, as they were submitted,
Built Environment Work Group
Focal Areas and Strategies
Fina� Draft August 15. 2011
Focal Area 1
Create Land Development Strategies for Climate Resilience, Sustainable Growth, Risk
Reduction, and Emergency Pmmpanmdnmmm
There is a demonstrated synergy between sustainable development practices and efforts to
improve community resilience to climate change impacts. By promoting a"no regrets" approach,
it is possible to affect positive outcomes that further regional climate change mitigation and
adaptation goals while improving community livability, economic opportunities and resource
suotainabi|ity. These adaptation strategies address: building design, elevation and hardening;
transportation networks; other critical public infrastructure (potable water, wastewater, otonnwoter
andengrgv/poweh; and green infrastructure.
Strategies
1> Regional Planning: |noorporate ^8daptationAotionArea^ deoiOnation. andotherapp|ioab|e
provisions, into local Comprehensive Plans and regional planning documents to identify those
areas deemed most vulnerable to sea level rise and other climate change impacts including
extreme high tides, heavy local rain events, storm surge, or inadequate drainage systems.
Action 1: Perform vulnerability analysis to identify and quantify the economic value of
regions and infrastructure at risk under various sea level and other climate change
scenarios utilizing inundation mapping, modeling, and other appropriate tools.
Action 2: Identify and designate"Adaptation Action Areas" (AAA) based on the results of
vulnerability analyses. Inside AAA, local governments should identify "Adaptation Areas,"
"Restoration/\neao.^ and "Growth/\reao.^
�
J�w*&m�I�/�������[�ms»{�u��C6mpml C�wm�s O4�'�l C�m�e/1d�vP�v ��-�
Adaptation Areas—designate areas within the AAA that include developed vulnerable
land targeted for infrastructure improvements or modified land use and/or development
practices in order to reduce risks and improve hazard mitigation. In these areas, the
high cost of retrofitting, building and maintaining infrastructure is outweighed by the
return in investment.
Restoration Areas-designate areas within the AAA that include vulnerable lands that
may or may not be already developed and could include Coastal High Hazard area and
high storm surge areas. Local governments should place priority on the acquisition of
land in these areas for restoration, agriculture, or recreational open space.
Growth Areas—to consist of areas outside of the AAA where growth is encouraged
due to higher topographic elevations and the presence of existing transportation
infrastructure. These designated areas should be developed with Urban Design
guidelines that address character of urban place and provide a high quality pedestrian
experience through landscaping, and the creation of public space.
Action 3: Provide public outreach and education to better inform the community about
the need for climate change planning, the provision in state law that provides for the
designation of"Adaptation Action Areas,"and the purpose and implications of such a
designation.
2) Local Planning and Zoning: Develop policies, strategies, and standards that will serve to
reduce future risk and economic losses associated with sea level rise and flooding in these
designated areas through infrastructure improvements and by directing future development
and redevelopment to areas outside AAA. This will also foster sustainable growth patterns,
multi-modal transportation options,transit, mixed use development, and the use of sustainable
building techniques.
3) Building Code: Revise building codes and require increased resiliency of buildings and
infrastructure for new and redevelopment, particularly for those areas within Adaptation Action
Areas.
4) Emergency Preparedness: Evaluate adaptation responses for communities at risk and
enhance preparedness measures to address climate-related risks and hazards.
Action 1: Improve adaptation responses for communities at risk with the development and
implementation of:
• Methodologies for the assessment and evaluation of evacuation and
relocation options
• Model evacuation policies and procedures for communities at increased risk of
flooding
• Model relocation policies for affected communities
Action 2: Incorporate climate change adaptation in the relevant Local Mitigation Strategy
(LMS)to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from disasters.
Within the LMS, update local risk assessments to include climate change in the hazard
analysis and vulnerability assessment section.
5) Education: Develop outreach programs to increase public awareness about hazards
exacerbated by climate change and mitigation and adaptation strategies by the local
government to minimize damage and risk.
B-2 A Rq a v Resptan&to Ea Chaqp�g C_;f mI ale
Focal Area 2
Ensure the Long-term Adequacy of Surface Water Management Systems,Water Supplies
and Wastewater Infrastructure
Climate change presents an array of challenges to future water supply planning and water
management efforts. The combined influences of altered precipitation patterns, increased
groundwater elevations, and sea level rises present complex hurdles to regional and local efforts in
providing critical drainage and flood control; high quality, sustainable, and abundant water supplies;
and effective management of stormwater and wastewater. By assuming an integrated approach
to water resource management and climate adaptation planning, the influence of a changing
climate on the quality and quantity of water resources and related infrastructure can be effectively
addressed. Interrelationships between stormwater management, water supply, wastewater
disposal and water reuse must be reviewed and actions implemented to ensure the beneficial
supply and use of all available water resources in a manner that benefits the public, protects
resources, accounts for future conditions, and provides for necessary levels-of-service.
Strategies
1\ Risk Assessments: Inventory existing potable water, wastewater, andetornlw/ater
treatment, delivery and collection systems; assess the status of each component; determine
the potential impact from climate change; and develop different climate change scenarios and
adaptation strategies for high-risk utilities and/or infrastructure which may require replacement,
reinforcement, or relocation to ensure the long term viability of the system.
Action 1: Identify and/or develop baseline hydrologic conditions to provide a measure for
comparison in assessing the potential impacts of climate change on regional and local
water resources and infrastructure, including the short-term the development of a saltwater
intrusion baseline.
Action 2: Utilize inundation mapping, variable density models, and water management
models to identify areas and infrastructure at risk.
ActiOD3: Identify and quantify vulnerable vveUDB|da, water supply infrastructure,
wastewater collection and/or treatment infrao[rumture, and drainage tooi|iUeo, and devise
strategies to protect orrelocate, as needed.
2\ Reuse and Aquifer Recharge: Identify opportunities[o advance beneficial use ofe[ormxvater
and reclaimed water to reduce potable water demands and provide aquifer recharge and
implement aoappropriate, as an alternative todisposal.
Aotion1: Evaluate the impacts of rising sea and groundwater levels on soil storage,
infiltration rates and inflow to stormwater and wastewater collection and conveyance
systems; consider longer-term influences on water quality; and develop strategies for
implementing reclaimed water and atornlwoater reuse projects thatm000untfnrournantand
future conditions.
Action 2: Identify potential sites for use in providing oh/rnlm/aterotorage and rneohenianna
to increase aquifer recharge as a means for managing saltwater intrusion and enhancing
water supplies.
Action 8: Consider regional projects ondopportuDiUeS[ogaineOicienciBSthrough
collaborative approaches and projects.
l�_�
J��m�I���Rwum�C�m��o��0�w/�am� D�,m�C8��Au�*0� �� �
3) Develop Integrated Water Management Plans that
present ak joint assessment and planning strategy involving local water utilities, wastewater
service providers, water managers, and partners[o the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Connpao[, for coordinated consideration of stormwater use and disposal, traditional
and alternative water supplies, wastewater disposal and reuse, and water conservation
measures for use by local leadership to guide planning decisions as well as amendments to
applicable codes and regulations.
4) Drainage and Flood Control: Identify and pursue adaptation strategies to improve drainage
and flood control in areas designated as"Adaptation Action Areas" and where changing
hydrologic conditions are anticipated to impact surface water management.
Action 1: Coordinate with the South Florida Water Management Diotrict. [}noina0o/
Water Control OiStricto, and public works officials to identify flood control and Stonnxvoter
management infrastructure already operating below the design capacity.
Action 2: Develop and apply appropriate hydrologic and hydraulic models to further
evaluate the efficacy of existing water management systems and flood control/drainage
infrastructure under variable climate conditions.
Action 3: Develop and test adaptation improvements needed[omaintain existing levels of
service and conduct o cost-benefit analysis to prioritize potential improvemento, trade-off
deoiaiona, and any proposed land acquisitions.
Aotion4: Incorporate and prioritize preferred improvement projects in capital improvement
plans and pursue funding.
5) Everglades Restoration: Support and advocate for complete implementation and funding for
the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan aa fundamental hu Everglades restoration,
but also the viability of local water resource management efforts given the overall contributions
of the Everglades to regional water storage and aquifer recharge, which will become
increasingly important under variable climate conditions and in the face of sea level rise.
Focal Area 3
Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Improved Regional Strategies for Energy
Efficiency, Conservation & Renewable Energy
^ Climate change mitigation can be addressed through plans, incentives, and regulations which
promote the efficient use of energy in buildings, transportation and industry; through the use of
less carbon-intensive energy sources; and through the production and use of renewable energy.
Regulatory barriers to alternative energy generation must be removed in order to allow these
sources of energy to be tapped. Federal and state policies that promote alternative energy use,
such as renewable energy portfolio standards for utilities and tax credits for home owners installing
srna||-ooa|e renewable systems must bedeveloped.
Strategies
1) Regional Coordination: Undertake regional efforts to advance ener0y-efhoienuiem. energy
conservation and the deployment of renewable and alternative energy technologies in existing
and proposed developments through local ordinance, incentives, education, and energy
efficiency financing.
�
��--r /& R�bnIi�jyomdsma(_'h^�6�,,,{]8olote
2) Green Building Code: Incorporate sustainable building and neighborhood ratings or national
model green building codes, including but not limited to those defined in Section 255.253(7),
F.S., into municipal codes region-wide.
3) Local Codes: Develop and implement amendments to local and state building codes, land
use regulations and laws to facilitate and encourage the installation of renewable energy
systems. Examine existing zoning codes and development standards and revise and update
provisions that act as a barrier to the installation and use of renewable energy systems.
4) Finance: Work collaboratively toward the establishment of regional framework to
deliver Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy finance options, in addition to other local
government initiatives and partnerships, to advance regional greenhouse gas emissions
goals, the use of alternative and renewable energy technologies, and in furtherance of green
sector economic development.
5) Goals: Set recurring 5—year regional goals to increase renewable energy capacity—which
include the co-benefits of economic development and job creation --through revision of
building and zoning codes and architectural design guidelines to allow for, and encourage,
integration of renewable energy sources and technologies.
6) Measures: Build upon established methodologies and mechanisms for Greenhouse
Gas measurement, verification and validation to create quantifiable recordkeeping and
reporting which conforms with accepted global standards.
7) Education: Provide education and improve communications on energy efficiency and
available technologies with a focus on both short-term and life-cycle economic and energy
gains, incentives available within the region (federal, state, local and commercial).
Land and Natural to s Working Group
Pdority Recommendations
Monitor Climate Change
a. Establish coordination with NOAA regarding trends in rainfall patterns. Choose an annual
conference or other venue at which such trends can be reviewed at regular intervals.
b. Monitor changes in rainfall patterns to better predict future wet-season and dry- season
rainfall as well as the salt content in the wells of agricultural lands.
c. Develop a vital signs status and trends monitoring program for biological communities. Key
parameters may include rate of sea-level rise; saltwater intrusion boundary and monitoring
wells; landscape-level vegetation patterns; percent cover in offshore reef zones; water
temperature and pH in areas; and occurrence and range of invasive exotic plants and animal
species. Ensure Department of Health beach water quality monitoring continues and expand
methods of notifying the public and tourism industry when exceedances are detected.
Water Storage
It is probable that climate change will also bring about changes in rainfall patterns, either by
quantity, intensity in any given rain event or seasonality and perhaps all of these.Although the
extent of such changes cannot be known, it is known that fresh water storage can ameliorate such
changes.
Southeast I'l nid a Regional C:,`Zzarrcarx Chaite Con/ r;zet C:as€n�zfu S �rer tsl t,'Irrr r tr°,=�s rr�a 1' a�F= —
a. Identify lands to be used for water storage to ameliorate changes in rainfall patterns.
Storage areas and methods should be planned and located to accommodate drinking water
supply, agricultural consumption, accepting flood waters and to maintain hydroperiods on
natural lands.
b. Identify and promote other land uses compatible with water storage including wetland
restoration, certain agricultural operations and certain renewable energy production facilities.
Develop joint acquisition and management strategies with these other entities.
c. Manage water storage in the region's publicly-owned uplands and wetlands.
d. Encourage continued funding for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP).
e. Support CERP Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) flow-way plans that increase freshwater
flows to the Everglades, maximize freshwater storage and provide opportunities to improve
water quality by establishing marsh communities.
Resource Acquisition
Acquisition efforts should emphasize preserving existing species diversity as well as considering
changing rainfall patterns and elevated saline waters, increasing the region's resiliency against he
impacts of natural hazards.
a. Develop acquisition priorities in a regional setting to:
1. Ensure preservation of many habitat types and that those types will be represented
in a changing climate.
2. Protect high quality drinking water supply
3. Identify hot spots of biological diversity and ensure those locations are either
protected or are identified for future land acquisition.
4. Identify and protect higher level lands to which mangrove and salt-marsh species
might `retreat'.
b.Assess acquisition priorities in light of changing rainfall patterns, i.e., if rainfall is more,
is the parcel still valuable for identified vulnerable species, if rainfall is less, is the parcel
still valuable to other vulnerable species. Consider linkages and migration opportunities for
vulnerable species.
c. Incorporate"Adaptation Action Area" designation into local comprehensive plans and
regional planning documents to identify those natural areas deemed most vulnerable to
climate change impacts including changes in sea level and rainfall patterns.
d. Share acquisition priorities among planning and regulatory agencies
e. Promote federal, state and local government conservation land acquisition programs that
including fee simple and less-than-fee approaches to conserve natural areas, protect open
space and create or maintain resilience and adaptive capacity by maintaining or creating
connectivity among natural areas from the coast to inland/upslope.
f. Following the model set by Monroe County, link rate of new construction permit issuance to
conservation land acquisition rate.
g. Monetize ecological services provided by natural systems and create a sustainable funding
mechanism for their protection and management.
Rev'On Responds to a C"hai€qiq C"Lmale
Resource Management
Climate change will likely bring about more rapid introduction of exotics species. Some tools, such
as prescribed fire, may become more difficult to implement. Management efforts may become
more intense as lands are managed for certain vulnerable species. Regional cooperation among
land management entities will become more essential.
a. Coordinate regional invasive exotic species prevention and control efforts emphasizing
prevention of new invasions and early detection/rapid response to nascent invasions.
b. Coordinate regional fire management efforts emphasizing frequent, low intensity fire
regimes in wetland and pine forest systems to maximize habitat quality, resilience tochange
and carbon neutrality while preventing fuel load build up that leads to major oarbonre|eeaeo.
c. Coordinate "living shorelines"objectives at regional scale to foster use of green
infrastructure (e.g. coral reefs and mangrove wetlands) instead of or in addition to grey
infrastructure (e.g. bulkheads).
d. Leverage existing work of the Florida Reef Resilience Program's"Climate Change Action
Plan for Florida's Coral Reef System 2O10-2D15 for protection ofmarine habitat.
e. Maintain natural resources critical to support the Region's Largest Economic
Sectors
Migration &Species Diversity
a. Identify potential species and habitat vulnerabilities toextremes in precipitation, including
extended drought and intense otorrna, combined with higher temperatures.
b. Examine water control structures to ensure that they can provide for inland or upstream
migration of riparian species ao freshwater habitats become more saline.
c. With the assistance of climate models, maintain or restore multiple areas of habitat and
large-scale connectivity to facilitate population stability and habitat shifts naau|Ung from
climate change.
d. Minimize diversity and abundance of habitat-homogenizing exotic plant and animal
species by monitoring for introductions, colonization, establishment, and connections with
other populations.
e. Engage and cooperate with marine resource agencies to maintain coral reef(e.g.,
selective breeding) and mangrove ecotones as estuarine habitat and natural barriers to storm
surge for maintaining C0@St8| biodive[Sitv.
Public Outreach
a. Modify existing public outreach, education and engagement programs at natural areas
(including upland, wetland, marine, coastal and nearshore environments)to include climate
change mitigation and adaptation messaging and volunteer opportunities to enhance green
infrastructure that will facilitate climate change resilience and adaptation.
b. Initiate a regional public education campaign to educate residents, business owners, policy
makers on the merits of preserving open land as an 'insurance policy'for adaptation to sea
level rise in South Florida.
8�_7
�����}���������� f������n�� B '
Agricultural Lands
Research
a. Identify& secure research funding to include but not limited to:
i) Review and document freshwater marsh peat potential responses to saltwater
intrusion.
ii) Monitor root-zone salinities and changes to vegetation communities.Adapt planning
and management in response to surprises.
iii) Identify seagrass, mangrove, and coastal freshwater marsh environmental
tolerances to changing factors such as salinity, water depth, substrate, and
nutrients. Use this information with climate and hydrological modeling to aid
management.
iv) Improve Florida Bay shallows bathymetry and use SLR and storm surge modeling
to aid identification of habitats at risk.
v) Better identify linkages between marine system (e.g. coral reefs and mangrove
wetlands) area/condition and hazard risk reduction.
Police
a. Develop regulatory requirements that compatible dredge material may be utilized in the
restoration of previously existing or establishment of new seagrass beds.
b. Ensure that zoning regulations allow for the ability of plant and animal species to migrate
inland as sea levels rise (e.g., limit armoring.) Ensure that land acquisition priorities consider
landscape features which may limit species ability to migrate in response to sea level rise and
other impacts related to climate change.
c. Enforce Coastal Construction Line and Coastal High Hazard Area designations.
d. Develop policies and regulations that will serve to reduce future risk and economic losses
associated with sea-level rise and flooding in these designated areas through infrastructure
improvements, insurance subsidization of high- hazard development and by directing
development and growth to non-vulnerable areas.
Protected and Vulnerable Species
In the coastal Everglades, higher elevation plant species may be at more of a risk from sea-level
rise than the surrounding freshwater marsh because the marsh can migrate inland, but the upland
berms are isolated and their dependent species have no path for migration. Twenty-one of the
43 critically imperiled species extant in Everglades National Park occur in the buttonwood forests
coastal hammocks of the Everglades and Florida Keys. In all initiatives aimed at protecting the
natural environment, first emphasize a broad ecosystem approach, then evaluate potential conflicts
with specific protected resources. Where conflicts are recognized, attempt to resolve them with the
least compromise to broad ecosystem values.
a. Identify those narrow beaches lacking natural dunes which might possess high turtle-
nesting density but which might also be prone to high nest mortality due to nest wash-out
during more frequently expected storms and Identify more stable `receiving' beaches to which
nest may be relocated.
b. Develop long-term turtle-nesting beach preservation strategies and methods in advance of
anticipated coastal armoring which might result in loss of beach nesting habitat.
c. Identify zoos, aquariums, herbariums and gardens that might be the repository for seed
stock and captive breeding programs for those listed plants and animals under imminent
threat of local extirpation due to sea-level rise.
d. Compile species information for rare plant species in coastal hardwood hammocks and
buttonwood forests and develop adaptation plans that include, at a minimum, seed bank
repository collection and assisted propagation.
Additional Language for Consideration:
During the five years of this initial Regional Action Plan, those areas within the Southeast Florida
region that have been deemed most vulnerable to impacts associated with sea-level rise based
upon LiDAR mapping and vulnerability assessments, will be monitored for impacts. These impacts
may be from extreme high tides, heavy local rain events, storm surge, or inadequate drainage
systems. Those areas most impacted by these events will be considered for inclusion into one or
more of the "Adaptation Action Areas".
Climate change imposes long-term, continuous change on systems. Continuous changes make
management goals a moving target and an observable systems response to actions under
current conditions only a partial indicator of success.An adaptive management strategy must
include preparation for long-term, often gradual changes with potential for large abrupt changes.
Successful use of this strategy will require ecological and physical modeling to develop hypotheses
and goals. Integration of directed research, management, and research-focused monitoring, risk
assessment, and database management will be critical.
Transportation riGroup
Focal Areas and Strategies
The first focal area addresses adapting transportation infrastructure to the impacts of climate
change as well as planning policies to guide prioritization and investment that take into account
climate change impacts and emissions reductions. Incorporating climate change considerations
into planning and project programming processes would provide the opportunity for transportation
professionals and decision makers to develop the most cost effective strategies to best address the
impacts of climate change on transportation infrastructure.
The next focal areas are strategies to reduce emissions and are organized by the following
categories: alternative fuels and vehicle efficiency, system operation efficiencies, and vehicle
miles traveled. Each area is often referred to as a leg of a stool, recognizing the importance of
addressing all areas to achieve a balance, a strong foundation to build upon. Clearly, there is
no silver bullet approach to reducing emissions; it will take a variety of approaches to achieve
emissions reductions. Strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled and provide for multiple modes
of travel should be emphasized because of their long-term emissions reductions benefits and
health and social benefits. This approach addresses the three pillars of sustainability and aligns
with the Federal Livability Principles developed in 2009 to help guide transportation and other
planning conducted at the local and regional levels and federal investment decisions.
A final focal area is dedicated to funding issues and federal policies and programs critical to the
success of local and regional efforts.
4 afl cur.4t C" rrl;a e0 rl ;fi rrcaP C"fiEr,ar` <':rr e1 C.`rarr l°`es gioned/<:lir.�aat .M1dion Pkill mm
Focal Area 1
Develop stratec transportation infrastructure, and prioritize
iies to evaluate risk, adapt the existing
future investments that maximize resiliengy and greenhouse clas (GHG) emissions reductions.
Strategies
1} Identify means to effectively engage the multiple public and private sector entities with roles
and responsibilities involving the provision and maintenance oftransportation infrastructure
and the delivery of transportation services in the region. Document current and evolving
coordination efforts among these entities.
2\ Work together to identify transportation infrastructure at risk from climate change in the
region; determine whether, when, where, and to whom projected impmctefrorno|imateohange
might besignificant. Employ inundation mapping, modeling and other appropriate tools tO
assess the vulnerability of transportation infrastructure to the projected innpmotoofo|immte
change under various sea level rise and other climate change scenarios.At a minimum, assess
the vulnerability 0f the following transportation infrastructure:
a> Local transportation networks of the Compact Counties
b\ The tri-county Regional Transportation Network' designated bv the Southeast Florida
Transportation Council (GEFTC). which includes facilities that provide the highest level of
mobility, strategic transportation facilities that are critical to region's economy and quality of
|ife, including corridors (poadwmy, rail, waterway), airpoda, aempoda, freight rail terminals,
passenger rail and intercity bus terminals, and evacuation routes.
3) Develop adaptation actions that prioritize the peop|e, p|aoeo, and infrastructure most
vulnerable to the projected impactoonthatnanoportationnetwork. Use arisk-management
approach to adapt the existing network including criteria such as timing, likelihood, intensity of
anticipated risks as well as costs relative to action versus inaction (description in the Circular
On Adapting Transportation tD the Impacts Of Climate Change State of the Practice 20YYht W
. Best practices also available from N\( CA,
and London.)
a) Develop regional priorities for short and long term maintenance and retention of
the transportation network for a 50 year and a 100 year timeframe; evaluate the costs
and benefits for maintenance and retention of existing transportation infrastructure, or
construction, maintenance and retention of new infrastructure.
b) Address issues of inequality and environmental justice associated with climate change
impacts and adaptation. Involve all parts of society in the development design and
implementation of adaptation actions addressing the transportation network.
o) Identify those strategies that provide co-benefits, such as improving disaster
preparedness, promoting sustainable resource management, and reducing GHG emissions
including the development of cost-effective technologies.
z
ssprC, Technical Memorandum#8: Regional Transportation Network,April 2Vz0. This network for omonn/-opde, omwwu,vnd
Palm Beach counties is composed of regional interstate and expressway facilities, major regional facilities(urban or rural prin-
cipal arterial roadways and other roadways that cross county lines), regional connection facilities, regional facility designation
extensions,Strategic Intermodal System hubs,corridors and connectors designated by the Florida Department of Transportation;
adopted physical extensions of current regional facilities,and the statewide regional evacuation network with termini determined
by the South Florida and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councils and the state legislature.
x���
/a .-,i8e�o,mRtpei,bm,{l)u����]6mmte
4) Integrate consideration of climate change impacts and adaptation into the planning,
operations, policies, and programs of local and regional transportation agencies.
a) Develop policy statements to incorporate the consideration of climate adaptation
into planning processes and investment decisions and adopt the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Guiding Principles for Climate Change Adaptation
-Adopt integrated approaches.
- Prioritize the most vulnerable.
- Use best-available science.
- Build strong partnerships.
-Apply risk-management methods and tools.
-Apply ecosystem-based approaches.
- Maximize mutual benefits.
- Continuously evaluate performance.
(htW.*Ilwww.dot.gov/docs/climatepolicysta tement.pdf)
b) Develop policies to incorporate climate change adaptation strategies into hazard
mitigation and post-disaster redevelopment planning.
c) Develop policies to address new transportation infrastructure development-to consider
future floodplain conditions and vulnerable areas—e.g. rerouting of roads because of
potential flood damage.
d) Modify or develop new design standards for transportation infrastructure located in
identified vulnerable areas, e.g. asphalt concrete composition, bridge design, elevation,
stormwater management. i.e. Include different pitches combined with stormwater design
and/or use of more permeable surfaces to effectively remove water from the roadway;
Explore roadway materials that may be utilized in road construction that are more tolerant
to quick changes in hot or cold weather, or more tolerant of extended periods of extreme
temperatures, in order to decrease repair costs, enhance safety, and increase longevity of
road surfaces.
e) Develop and require a training program to educate professionals in relevant fields
(e.g., architecture, engineering, and construction management)to incorporate adaptation
to climate change as a basis for establishing design criteria for new transportation
infrastructure. Completion of such training to be a condition for relicensing. (FL Energy&
Climate Action Plan —Adaptation Strategies, pg. 8-7).
f) Consider the adoption of a "Green" road design and construction sustainability rating
system.(Best practice research: NYDOT, University of Washington)
5) Focus investments and service expansions on strategies contributing to greenhouse gas
emissions reductions and enhancing resilience to climate change.
a) Continue and enhance regionally coordinated transportation planning through the
Regional Long Range Transportation Plan (RLRTP). Identify goals and objectives in the
Sua lbepast Hoiiela Ki gioneal C XI,,,v ate Ch arz e C:amil a C:'ounlile Ci(,,,gio ej1(,I nv ate Action 1'hi
RLRTP whose ultimate attainment reinforces the desired achievement of GHG emission
reductions and enhancing resilience to climate change. Articulate the supportive role each
objective has with respect to emissions reductions.
b) Transportation Investment Priorities. Give higher investment priority to transportation
infrastructure, programs and services that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Performance standards for climate and related metrics, such as reduced VMT and
increased mode split, should be incorporated in transportation and infrastructure
programs.
i) Develop policies in local and regional planning processes to incorporate evaluation
criteria and a process to rank and prioritize projects that meet plan goals and
objectives,with an emphasis on those that reduce VMT and use of transportation
modes other than the personal vehicle. Projects that enhance economic vitality should
also be given priority, such as projects and service expansions along transit oriented
corridors and those that improve connections to major airports and seaports. Develop
performance measures related to climate change (i.e. VMT reduction) as a means to
prioritize projects for funding.
c) Prioritize the funding of studies addressing effective adaptation and mitigation
strategies, particularly those addressing barriers and assisting in integrating land use
and transportation planning approach towards developing a transportation network that
reduces vehicle miles traveled by ensuring transportation choices other than the use of
personal vehicles.
e) Implement the recommendations in the RLRTP to incorporate/use modal prioritization
tools.
6) Other
a) Develop early warning systems and social media applications (apps) to both inform
residents and visitors of high-tide events and to raise overall awareness.
b) Identify incentives to encourage migration to less vulnerable areas.
Additional language for consideration:
Incorporate "Adaptation Action Area" designation into local comprehensive plans and the Regional
Climate Change Action Plan for those areas within the Southeast Florida region that have been
deemed most vulnerable to impacts associated with sea level rise. Within the "Adaptation Action
Areas", special regulations will be established to reduce or eliminate the potential for damage from
flooding. During the five years of this initial Regional Action Plan, those areas within the Southeast
Florida region that have been deemed most vulnerable to impacts associated with sea level rise
based upon LiDAR mapping and vulnerability assessments, will be monitored for impacts. These
impacts may be from extreme high tides, heavy local rain events, storm surge, or inadequate
drainage systems. Those areas most impacted by these events will be considered for inclusion into
one or more of the "Adaptation Action Areas".
13�2t Ce a zra Rej!"widr to<a C h ate qv C.`h'raaaar
Focal Area 2
Develop strategies to reduce GHG emissions through use of alternative fuels, vehicle and system
operation efficiencies, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction, and provision of multiple
transportation choices.
Strategies
Alternative Fuels &Vehicle Efficiengy
1\ Develop policies to create conditions for the developmentof alternative fuel
waste- based bio-diesel) and include these policies in regional plans and LocalComprehensive
Plans. Incentivize and remove legislative, local code that may act as obstacle to stimulate the
alternative energy industry.
(Example: Plan and program infrastructure improvements for Electric Vehicle Infrastructure
(EVI) in collaboration with local utilities. Policies should be developed to incentivize private
deployment 0finfrastructure. Solar charging for electric vehicles should b9prioritized
to improve the community's emergency management preparedness in times of power
Du&9g98.)
2) Establish a working group of public and private stakeholders to develop a strategy to
promote the use of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the region.
a) Establish locations where infrastructure is needed. Solar charging options should be
prioritized to maximize mitigation benefits and to improve the community's emergency
management preparedness in times of power outages.
b) Develop policies to inoenUvizethe deployment of infrastructure to complement transit
oriented corridors. Reduced transit fares should be a consideration for riders accessing
transit facilities by electric vehicles.
o) Work with relevant stakeholders to streamline permitting processes associated with
charging equipment to encourage the safe and expeditious installation on customer
premises and elsewhere.
d) Coordinate monetary and non-monetary incentives available to the general public and
organizations purchasing electric vehicles.
3) Develop strategies to promote fuel efficient driving habits.
e> Conduct best practice research on existing campaigns and look for opportunities to
Integrate tools into existing high eohoo|, county and municipal driver education courses,
traffic school curriculum, truck driver training, and fleet associations.
System Operation Efficiencies
1) Develop a toolbox of successful strategies to maximize the efficiency of the existing
transportation network that have been used by partners in the region. When feasible
information should include implementing steps, costs, and effectiveness of GHG emissions
reductions. Some strategies to consider include the use of roundabouts, traffic signal
prioritization for transit, queue jumps, etc.
��_� �
Jo^�m�'F���R��`����wn�(���oC�n�u���wm�� �����{J�x�.�n�uR6m �� �~"
2) Develop policies to facilitate and streamline the deployment of energy efficient and
renewable energy such as the installation of LEDs and/or solar for public infrastructure such as
street lighting, parks, parking facilities.
a) Survey counties and regional agencies with lighting infrastructure to determine the level
of deployment and to gather best practice policies and implementation steps to facilitate the
application of efficient lighting practices in additional infrastructure.
3) Develop a strategy for incentivizing the development of truck parking with electrification
facilities and the use of auxiliary power units to reduce extended idling by trucks.
a) Survey transportation agencies (MPOs, FDOT, etc.) for existing studies identifying
trucking patterns and needs.
b) Identify strategic locations for truck parking facilities and seek competitive funding
opportunities as a region.
4) Develop policies to reduce the impact of transportation construction, maintenance, and
agency operations -such as substituting fly ash for cement, using warm-mix instead of hot-
mix asphalt- on GHG emission reduction, and require construction contractors to implement
emissions reductions practices. Incorporate actions that reduce GHG emissions during project
development and implementation, such as using recycled materials, incorporating low carbon
cement mixtures, utilizing alternatively fueled vehicles, and purchasing locally or regionally
manufactured materials.
5) Provide seamless transitions between transportation modes to increase the use of low
carbon modes for the movement of people and freight in the region.
a) Improve connections between Tri-Rail and county transit service, municipal trolley and
community shuttle bus services(may include re-alignment of routes). District circulators
(Metro Mover in downtown Miami connects to Metro Rail) provide the last leg of a commute
for transit riders and should have high frequency and ease of transfer.
b) (Pl ceholdet for regional freaght strategies to integrate the many regional activities
underrva.y, e.g. periodic convening of regional freight summits providing opportunities to
address that audience, development of a virtual freight network, studies exploring the
potential for freight roil or? o € extern corridor; etc.)
c) Improve the transfers between transportation modes and move towards the delivery of a
seamless fare media across the region.
d) Develop planning strategies to address planning for the "First and Last Mile"of transit
trips.
Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Promote Multiple Modes
Local communities with mixed-use developments and streets designed to encourage non-
motorized modes of transportation are expected to reduce personal automobile trips. There is a
need to connect those communities to corridors that link to regional employment centers and other
destinations through low-carbon transportation options.The policies in this area will be developed
to support the Federal Livability Principles which among other things emphasize the reduction
of household transportation costs for people of all ages, incomes, races and ethnicities through
reliable access to employment centers, educational opportunities, services and other basic needs.
B214 A Region Rnptand s to a C h aazt!igl¢:Cron ate
1) Land Use Approaches.
a) Require new development and redevelopment projects in existing and planned
multimodal corridors and urban centers to be planned and designed to promote transit
oriented development and transit use, which mixes residential, retail, office, open space
and public uses in a pedestrian-friendly environment that promotes the use of rapid transit
services.
b) Develop policies to plan Transit Oriented Developments (TOD) along Transit Oriented
Corridors (TOC). Consider the Regional Transportation Network in the development of
potential TOCs. Develop policies to streamline the approval process for TODs.
c) Explore expansion of activity based transportation modeling to more accurately predict,
inform, and utilize transit trip data.
d) Develop policies to improve the movement of non-motorized modes through the
adoption of best practice models including Complete Streets.
i) Develop guidelines, models, and implementation projects to accelerate
implementation.
ii) Identify partners and resources to support training and the research into new
techniques for transportation design professionals.
e) Modify local land use ordinances to encourage compact development patterns.
i) Adopt form-based codes or hybrid codes that use physical form, rather than
separation of land uses, as their organizing principle and that take into consideration
the urban transect or context zones.
ii) Consider regional implementation of rapid transit zones to maintain land use control
around a station with multiple jurisdictions.
f) Consider the adoption of green neighborhood certification programs to guide decision
making and development and to provide an incentive for better location, design, and
construction of new residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments.
2)Transit Options—Transit
a) Study increasing service frequency on key routes and developing targeted transit
routes, in the model of 1-95 express to bring people directly from residential areas to
regional centers of employment.Another example is"The Flyer" route from MIA to Miami
Beach. Utilize existing studies of direct routes to inform this process.
b) Leverage limited resources for campaign and promotional advertisements by
coordinating regional public transportation messaging to attract"choice" riders. Messages
should focus on making riding transit cool.
c) Deploy social media applications, (apps)to facilitate use of transit including access to
real-time information such as arrival times.
d) Increase the amenities available to transit passengers, such as shade, shelters, kiosks,
and real time boarding information.
3) Transportation Demand Management
'Youthe a t Eloiid a Rgion al C.' male C<Ieange Cogrpae,t Counhei -R agionral4',"l r � r Adios Plzin
a) Vanpool/Carpool programs-Work with MPOs and South Florida Commuter Services to
identify opportunities to expand these programs.
b) Car& Bike Sharing Programs-Work with companies providing these services and
strategic partners (universities, municipalities, large employers, etc.) to establish zip car,
bike sharing and personal vehicle sharing programs.
4) Bicycle Facilities
a) Prioritize implementation of planned bicycle and pedestrian networks. Evaluate whether
these facilities are connected regionally and on a local scale to major employment,
education, and recreation centers.
b) Implement roadway project checklist that includes measures of pedestrian and bicycle
accommodation.
c) Consider regional adoption of Transit and Biking programs that aim to improve access to
transit.
d) Develop policies to increase designated bike parking facilities at commercial and retail
developments.
Focal Area 3
Federal Policies needed to support local and regional efforts
1) Federal Surface Transportation Authorization. Support new authorization of the federal
surface transportation programs with increased priority for funding public transit and non-
motorized travel and integrated regional and metropolitan planning as means to reduce the
greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. The federal program needs to
explicitly incorporate climate change and shift priorities toward programs that encourage
reinvestment in existing infrastructure and communities ("fix-it-first' programs), support public
transportation and transit-oriented development, and address congestion management
through means other than road building.
2) Reform Transportation Models and Enhance NEPA Processes. To recognize when shifts
are taking place in the true costs of road and transit, the surface transportation authorization
legislation should encourage the development of up-to-date models and tools that measure the
relative shifts in auto and transit costs, both up-front and on an operating basis as well as costs
related to climate impacts and performance. Further, the U.S. Department of Transportation
should be directed to develop ways and means to enhance the NEPA process in this regard as
NEPA is central to all highways and transit project investment analysis.
3) Increase CAFE Standards. Establish stronger Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
Standards and enforce their adoption.
FOP g,,en Responds to rx t:E t ar in C.`!=rzrz#e
Appendix C-Contributinglechmical and Staff Experts
BUILT ENVIRONMENT WORK GROUP PARTICIPANTS
Steve Adams The Resource Innovation Group
Jerry Allen Palm Beach County
Olga Alvarez LEED Consulting & Green Practice Design
Ricardo Alvarez Florida Atlantic University
Va|er\eAnnor Drawing Conclusions LLC
G|eDDAnnorVso Brovv8rdCounty
K8igue|Auogrrunz Bpovverd County
Steve Bassett Florida Energy and Climate Cornnn\eeion
Maria Batista Miami-Dade County Transit
Barbara Blake Boy BnovvardCounh/
Gilberto Blanco Miami Dade Planning &Zoning
Marina Blanco-Pape Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resource Management
Richard Blattner City CfHollywood
Fred B|oetsoher Florida Atlantic University
Marc Bruner Palm Beach County
Donald Burgess BrovvandCounty
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Wayne Burns BrovvapdCounty
Office of Economic and Small Business Development
KenCoban Tetratech Consulting, South Florida Region
David Cabrera Brovvard County Facilities Maintenance Division
Bob Cambric South Florida Regional Planning Council
Al Carbon City of Fort Lauderdale
Tyler Chappell Chappell Group
David Chin University ofMiami
Ronald L. Crone Lake Worth Drainage District
John Crouse Brovvand County
Bryan Davis Palm Beach County
Erin Deady Deady Law
Ann Margaret Eonand Florida Atlantic University
Bonnie Finneran Palm Beach County
Benjamin Franco Environmental Protection Agency
Bob Freeman Environmental Protection Agency
TimGar|ing B0ward County Transit
Nancy Gassman Brovv8rdCoVn[y
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
LudanaGonza|ez City ofMiami
Debbie Griner Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resource Management
Richard Grosso Nova Southeastern University
Kevin Hart South BrOvv8nd Drainage District
�--U
Iov��#29ob�Rq�'ww/�}�x�'{]��°<�m����mn�� 8���l�l�x�'.�a�vIk� �� �
KUcholeHeftv Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resource Management
Carlos Hernandez Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resource Management
Jill Horwitz Browmrd County
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Jennifer Jurado BrovvandCounty
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Anne Keller U.8. Environmental Protection Agency
Glenn Landers U.S. Army Corps ofEngineering
Sandra Lee U.S. Green Building Council
G\enniLodi Miami-Dade County
Barney McCoy Bn}vvand County Transit
Jason McDonald U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Steve McGrew Palm Beach County
Peter Merritt Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Gaspar Miranda Miami-Dade County Public Works
F(ayN1imonna|i Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management
Ken Mitchell U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Carole Morris South Florida Water Management District
J|[D N1uMey Florida Atlantic University
Jayanthm (]beyaekere South Florida Water Management District
Danny Orlando U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Albert Perez City ofHollywood
Elizabeth P|8bsrZvberk University ofMiami
Alan P0vve|| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Catherine Prince Miami Dade Planning @Zoning
John Ramos Brovvanj County Transit
Bob Renken U.8. Geological Survey
Jonathan Roberson Brovvand County Transportation
HootorSannario U.8. Green Building Council
Kim Shuger South Florida Water Management District
HenryGniezek BrowmndCounty
Norm Taylor Brovv8rd County
W1aur\oeTobon Palm Beach County
F7iuhardTornese BpovvardCounty
Eduardo Vega Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department
Leon8ndVi@|p8ndo Bn}vv8ndCounty
Tom Walker Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority
Patti Webster Brovv8rdCounty
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Kevin Wilson Monroe County
Lisa Wilson Davis Qh/ of Boca Raton
K4ik8Zvonerski BrovverdCounh/
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
�� �
��-'� A RepiomD^�pnnds to a(3at�g6�Climate
LAND AND NATURAL SYSTEMS WORK GROUP PARTICIPANTS
LVreOzOAoheOlo Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building
A|brey&ninoton Lox8hatohee River District
Ken Banks Brovv8rdCounh/
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Chris Bergh The Nature Conservancy
Ronnie Best U.8. Geological Survey
Julie Bishop Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management
Donald Burgess BrovvandCountv
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
BiUyCausey Natural Marine Sanctuaries
Nancy Craig Bn}vv@nd County Environmental Monitoring Laboratory
ChaOta| Collier Southeast Florida Coral Reef Initiative
Janice [}uqueone| Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection
Sara Edge Florida Atlantic University
Bonnie Finneran Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management
Bob Glazer Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Cynthia Guerra Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management
Katie Halloran Miami-Dade County Planning and Zoning
}saaCHoyos Palm Beach County Department of Planning, Zoning and Building
Elizabeth Hurnp|e Bn}vvard County Environmental Monitoring Lab
Dan Kimball Everglades National Park
Thomas E. Lodge Ecological Advisors, Inc.
Peter Merritt Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Anne K8orki|| Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuge
Sean Morton Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
Jim KDudey Florida Atlantic University
Eric Myers Bn}vv@nj County
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Mark Nelson Jonathan Dickenson State Park
Sylvia Pe|izza Loxehatohae National Wildlife Refuge
LeonardPgr|otine Everglades National Park
Ronald Rice Cooperative Extension Service
Robert Robbins Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management
Michael Roberts Monroe County
Tr@c\ Ronline Audubon OfFlorida
Barry Rosen U.8. Geological Survey
VVinnie Said South Florida Water Management District
Hydrologic& Environmental Systems Modeling
Jim Schuette [}uPu\a Management Area
South Florida Water Management District
Fred Sklar South Florida Water Management District
8ieveTrax|er U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
Katherine Tzadih Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Tom Van Lent Everglades Foundation
RichandVVo|aaky Palm Beach County
Patti Webster Brovvard County
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
��_�
J�6�^�n���n��m����������� ��w��m����o�� "� �
TRANSPORTATION WORK GROUP PARTICIPANTS
LDnenzOAohenlo Palm Beach County Planning
Frederick B|oateohe[ Florida Atlantic University
Donald Burgess BrovvardCounty
Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
Lois Bush Florida Department Cf Transportation —District 4
Rita Carbonell Miami-Dade Expressway Authority
Steve Carrier Engineering and Public Works
Monica C j2s Miami-Dade County Transit
Carla Coleman Urban Land Institute
Antonio CCd8re|o Miami-Dade County Public Works
James Crornmr Brovvand Metropolitan Planning Organization
VVi|\iann Cross South Florida Regional Transportation Authority- Tri F{2i|
Tim Ga[|\ng Brovvend County Transit
AndrewGonrAiad\s Dover Kohl & Partners
Oebbi8Griner Miami-Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management Air Quality Management
Nicho|8 Hefty Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management
ChristineHeshrnati South Florida Regional Planning Council
Becky Hope K8\arni-[)Gde County Seaport
John Morgan South Florida Water Management District
Catherine Prince Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning
Jarioe Rodriguez Florida Atlantic University
Napo|ean8ornoza Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning
Gregory Stuart Brovv8rd Metropolitan Planning Organization
SusanneTnrrienta Miami-Dade County Office of8uotainabi|itv
Paul Vitro Miami-Dade Emergency Management
Jeff Weidner Florida Department of Transportation —District 4
Lynda Westin Southeast Florida Regional Transportation
EnriqueZe|oya Brovverd County Transportation Planning
�� �
��-~� ,4&ggio, Ruspm*b tovCbom���C%ma�
Appendix D-Regional Transportation Network
o� Martin
.,
t.,t 'C', m,. rn p ed 0 r pr sent t vel of aml .Dade, Bricyllivaird and
ailm Beach Metropoitan NenrOg OrgarI231,011S,diesgrates a regton&p
trarsportaton network for the Inu county area it curers uu rrr spe rtur,
c nt rnar Tttescgr,rilerialoeireapphWtoMOrMeCotmtyto oethts
rr,
lbuur- aunty reqMW network map
�
�t
t
Palm Beach
Hendry ' Browar°
Collier E
W Frokft,Hub A
ftsUmoorHu
15 Seaport Hui
Miami-Dade
www rtti Freeway milliol
3
- Ilouluuuu,' Ir
I,
Monroe w �II�II
�w
tog
r
r�
N
II
I
Monroe
two+t
I
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties-Regioraul C'Gmcrte Action Plan
M., Supporting Documents
The following support documents from the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact are available on the Compact website at:
southeastfloridaclimatecom ap ct.org
A. Regional Climate Action Plan Implementation Guide
B. Compact Counties'Policy and Advocacy Implementation Report
C. Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Baseline Period:2005-2009
D. A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida
E. Analysis of the Vulnerability of Southeast Florida to Sea Level Rise
The White Paper on Adaptation Action Areas by the Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity (Support Document F) is also available on the Compact website.
80 A Region R,,spondv to a Changing Climate
Photo Credits
Cover: Everglades image,provided by the South Florida Water Management District
Coastal development,provided by Broward County
Seven mile bridge,provided by Monroe County
Scooter on flooded street,provided by Miami-Dade County
Inside Cover: Red Reef Beach,provided by Palm Beach County
Page iv: City with mangroves,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 2: Living shoreline,provided by Palm Beach County
Page 4: Compact signing,provided by Broward County
Page 6: Air quality monitoring,provided by Broward County
Page 8: Connect the Dots 350 event,provided by Jeff Keating
Page 9: Beach erosion,provided by Broward County
Page 12: Sunrise over ocean,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 14: Rain flooding,provided by Broward County
Page 15: Mola Avenue flood,provided by Broward County
Page 18: Roads,provided by Broward County
Page 21: People biking,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 22: Port Everglades container ship,provided by Broward County
Page 24: Choice riders on bus,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 28: Inundation at Keys Airport,provided by Monroe County
Page 30: Storm sewer cleaning,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 31: Biscayne,provided by the South Florida Water Management District
Page 33: Coral monitoring,provided by Broward County
Page 34: Roseate Spoonbills,provided by the South Florida Water Management District
Page 35: Parched sugar,provided by Palm Beach County
Page 36: Market,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 37: Plug-in vehicle,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 37: Children with solar array,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 39: Hurricane aerial,provided by the South Florida Water Management District
Page 41: News reporter,provided by Miami-Dade County
Page 43: Children planting trees,provided by Broward County
Page 44: Compact press conference after BP spill,provided by Broward County
From left to right:Monroe County Commissioner George Neugent,Miami-Dade County
Commissioner Katy Sorenson,Palm Beach County Commissioner Shelley Vana,and
Broward County Commissioner Kristin Jacobs.
Page 51: People exiting South Beach bus,provided by Miami-Dade County
Back Cover: Mom and son at beach,provided by Miami-Dade County
/ / I
1/
/
r r
tl i I i ItlMi 1 Y I
/
I 111 I
r i
"i
� I I,
I J,
, 1
6u
r ,
„wJ
r�
.
�
i / l
��r11f1/ll��1f �ff1J1J, / /
/
IV
r��l 11�1
IN
SOUTHEAST FLORIDA . �
4
MIN
,
/////O% %
1,1111011/s/
01
/, 1
l/ Ads /
BKPAARD MIAMI COUNTY iD
This document was produced by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,a regional collaborative including Broward,Miami-Dade,Monroe and Palm Beach Counties,
and promulgated at a cost of$4,634 or$6.62 per copy,for the purpose of providing information on climate change planning strategies relevant to Southeast Florida.
NR20124941109/12