The URL can be used to link to this page

Item L07 L.7 Coty f � ,�� ,' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �� Mayor David Rice,District 4 The Florida Keys � Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates,District 1 y Michelle Coldiron,District 2 James K.Scholl,District 3 Ij Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5 County Commission Meeting November 15, 2022 Agenda Item Number: L.7 Agenda Item Summary #11306 BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Airports TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Richard Strickland(305) 809-5200 N/A AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of the Draft Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) and Supporting Documentation for Key West International Airport AND approval to transmit the document to the FAA for review and compliance determination. ITEM BACKGROUND: Monroe County has a tong-established goal to provide aviation facilities to all residents and guests in a manner that maximizes safety, convenience, economic benefit, and environmental compatibility. As part of the plan to achieve its goal, Monroe County conducted a 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study in the mid to late 1990s to explore the impact of aircraft noise on the surrounding community. This Part 150 Study culminated with FAA approval of NEMs and a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) on May 7, 1999. To remain eligible for federal funding for implementation of the Noise Insulation Program (NIP), Monroe County has prepared periodic updates to EYW's NEMs. This current update was necessary due to changes in aircraft operational levels and the aircraft fleet mix operating at the airport. The Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation report documents the methods and data that were used to prepare the 2022 and 2028 NEMs and identifies the compatible and noncompatible land uses within the noise contours. The 2022 and 2028 NEMs are an update to the EYW NEMs that were accepted by the FAA on December 19, 2013. The Ad Hoc Committee meetings served as the primary mechanism for receipt of public input for the NEM Update. Issues were raised, comments and suggestions were made, and all were discussed during the Ad Hoc Committee meetings that occurred between October 2020 and October 2022. During their meeting on October 4, 2022, the Ad Hoc Committee unanimously voted to accept the Draft NEM Update and submit it to the BOCC. The Draft NEM Update was made available for review by the public and interested parties for a period of 31 days. The Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft NEM was published on the Airport's website and in the Key West Citizen newspaper as well as keysnews.com during the week of September 17, 2022. Printed copies of the Draft NEM were available for the public to review in three locations in Key West. The Draft NEM was also available online at https:Heyw.com/public- Packet Pg. 3025 L.7 notices. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On September 16, 2020, the BOCC granted approval of two relevant items: (1) Item C17 Ratification and approval of FAA Grant Agreement 43-12-0037-061-2020 providing $4,958,363.00 in funding for the Noise Insulation Program (NIP) for the Key West International Airport Noise Insulation Program (NIP) at Key West by the Sea(KWBTS), and Part 150 Noise Exposure Map (NEM)Update. (2) Item C22 Approval of Jacobs Project Management Co.'s Task Order No. 12/15- 76 for the preparation of Noise Exposure Map Update in the amount of$169,219.00. The project was funded 100%by FAA. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval DOCUMENTATION: 1 - Inside Cover 2 - Table of Contents 3 - List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 - Section 1 - Introduction 5 - Section 2 - Municipal Jurisdiction and Land Use 6 - Section 3 - Airport and Airspace Considerations 7 - Section 4 - Existing Conditions Year 2021 Noise Exposure 8 - Section 5 - Future Condition Year 2028 Noise Exposure 9 - Section 6 - Consultation and Public Involvement 10 - List of References 11 - Appendix A - History of the NCP at EYW 12 - Appendix B - Aircraft Noise 13 - Appendix C - Summary of Consultation 14 - Appendix D - Documentation of Ad Hoc Committee Meetings 15 - Appendix E-Public Comments and Responses 16 - Appendix F -NEM Review and Acceptance Documentation 17 - Appendix G - Large Scale Flight Track Maps and Noise Exposure Maps FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: Upon FAA compliance determination Expiration Date: Five (5) years after FAA compliance determination. Total Dollar Value of Contract: 0 Total Cost to County: 0 Current Year Portion: same Packet Pg. 3026 L.7 Budgeted: Yes Source of Funds: FAA Grant 3-12-0037-061-2020 CPI: Indirect Costs: Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: Revenue Producing: No If yes, amount: Grant: County Match: Insurance Required: No Additional Details: REVIEWED BY: Beth Leto Completed 11/01/2022 10:49 AM Richard Strickland Completed 11/01/2022 11:05 AM Pedro Mercado Completed 11/01/2022 11:20 AM Purchasing Completed 11/01/2022 11:23 AM Budget and Finance Completed 11/01/2022 12:13 PM Brian Bradley Completed 11/01/2022 12:42 PM Lindsey Ballard Completed 11/01/2022 12:46 PM Board of County Commissioners Pending 11/15/2022 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 3027 L.7.a DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION PREPARED FOR: MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0 OPERATOR OF: 06 U)e we 0 00 PREPARED BY: gllVll Ipuull�°o Imuuu IVum Vi I'�illlluuuu� �"Ipu°� of ppuu ��u Ilpuu uuuu'jpiu Vi � uuuuuuu m Nm� IIIIIVI" IIIIIIIIIIIIIII �IIII II �WIVVIIIIIII IIIIII�� Ipum IlVuulll IV'uuuVV uu Iliiii�uu °uuuV I Ipl luwulpVllluuW" C3 I ml,,,uuuuu II ullluumu uppllllll I � IW �� ulu ul III"' uVIIIIuuVVVll�iluu IIVuVIIulu�ll�"�I luuuuuum tll� �, I� muu�ll��uuVIIIIuuuuVluVVlluuVVWm I�uuVuuuuV�ll��"i� w upW I. � 'llpummVl n� IN CONJUNCTION WITH: RS&H AND c� aai.dd 7k� a.A IIIIPPPPIIII II BOCC REVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2022 Packet Pg. 3028 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................. i LISTOF APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................iv LISTOF TABLES..........................................................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................................viii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................ x 0 SECTION PAGE U) 06 U) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE PART 150 PROCESS................................................................................................. 1 1.2 KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEM UPDATE..................................................2 1.3 HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF THE NOISE COMPATIBILITY PLANNING PROCESS AT EYW........................................................................................3 4- 0 2 MUNICIPAL JURISDICTIONS AND LAND USE > 0 CL 2.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................5 CL 2.2 EXISTING LAND USE ........................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Residential .............................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Community Facilities..............................................................................................6 2.2.3 Parks and Recreational Properties........................................................................7 2.2.4 Historical Resources..............................................................................................8 2.3 FUTURE LAND USE......................................................................................................... 10 2.4 DEMOGRAPHICS............................................................................................................. 10 L) 2.5 LAND USE CONTROLS................................................................................................... 19 0 2.5.1 City of Key West...................................................................................................21 2.5.2 County of Monroe.................................................................................................22 N 2.6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES.....................................................................24 ; 3 AIRPORT AND AIRSPACE CONSIDERATIONS c� 3.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................27 3.2 AIRFIELD CONFIGURATION...........................................................................................27 3.3 AIRSPACE/AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES ...................................................28 3.3.1 Neighboring Airports............................................................................................28 3.3.2 Operational Procedures.......................................................................................29 3.3.3 Flight Corridors.....................................................................................................30 3.3.4 Existing Published Approaches...........................................................................34 3.4 METEOROLOGICAL DATA..............................................................................................34 Page i Packet Pg. 3029 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS, CONTINUED SECTION PAGE 4 EXISTING CONDITION: YEAR 2022 NOISE EXPOSURE 4.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................42 4.2 METHOD FOR DEVELOPING FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS..............42 4.2.1 Data Sources .......................................................................................................42 0 4.2.1.1 FlightRadar24..........................................................................................43 ° 4.2.1.2 OPSNET.................................................................................................43 4.2.1.3 TFMSC....................................................................................................44 6 4.2.1.4 EYW Landing Reports ............................................................................44 U) 4.2.2 Existing Condition Fleet Mix.................................................................................44 4.2.2.1 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Jet...........................................................................44 4.2.2.2 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Prop........................................................................45 4.2.2.3 General Aviation Jet................................................................................45 4.2.2.4 General Aviation Prop.............................................................................45 0 4.2.2.5 Military.....................................................................................................45 4.2.2.6 Helicopters..............................................................................................45 CL 4.2.3 Existing Condition Number of Operations............................................................46 CL 4.2.4 Existing Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations.....................................46 4.2.5 Time of Day..........................................................................................................49 4.2.6 Departure Profiles and Stage Length ..................................................................50 4.2.7 Runway Utilization ...............................................................................................51 4.2.8 Back Taxi Operations...........................................................................................52 4.2.9 Standing Takeoff Operations...............................................................................53 0 4.2.10 Low Approach, Touch-and-Go, and Go-Around Operations...............................54 4.2.11 Flight Tracks and Flight Track Utilization.............................................................54 0 4.2.12 Summary of Existing Condition NEM Modeled Operations.................................66 4.3 NOISE CONTOURS AND NONCOMPATIBLE LAND USES...........................................67 N 5 FUTURE CONDITION: YEAR 2028 NOISE EXPOSURE 5.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................72 cis 5.2 METHOD FOR DEVELOPING FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS..............72 5.2.1 Data Sources .......................................................................................................72 5.2.1.1 FAA Terminal Area Forecast..................................................................72 5.2.1.2 EYW Landing Reports ............................................................................73 5.2.2 Future Condition Fleet Mix...................................................................................74 5.2.2.1 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Jet...........................................................................74 5.2.2.2 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Prop........................................................................75 5.2.2.3 General Aviation Jet................................................................................75 Page ii Packet Pg. 3030 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS, CONTINUED SECTION PAGE 5.2.2.4 General Aviation Prop.............................................................................75 5.2.2.5 Military.....................................................................................................75 5.2.2.6 Helicopters..............................................................................................75 5.2.3 Future Condition Number of Operations..............................................................75 5.2.4 Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations.......................................76 5.2.5 Time of Day..........................................................................................................78 0 5.2.6 Departure Profiles and Stage Length ..................................................................79 5.2.7 Runway Utilization ...............................................................................................80 5.2.8 Back Taxi Operations...........................................................................................81 06 U) 5.2.9 Standing Takeoff Operations...............................................................................81 5.2.10 Low Approach, Touch-and-Go, and Go-Around Operations...............................82 5.2.11 Flight Tracks and Flight Track Utilization.............................................................82 5.2.12 Summary of Future Condition NEM Modeled Operations...................................83 5.3 NOISE CONTOURS AND NONCOMPATIBLE LAND USES...........................................84 4- 0 6 CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 0 6.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................91 CL CL 6.2 IDENTIFICATION OF CONSULTED PARTIES................................................................91 6.3 MONROE COUNTY AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE.................................................92 6.4 DRAFT NEM UPDATE REPORT .....................................................................................94 6.5 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT..................................................................................................95 6.6 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .....................................95 6.7 AIRPORT OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATION.....................................................................95 6.8 FAA REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEMS................................................................96 0 t3 0 LISTOF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................98 0 N 0 c� Page iii Packet Pg. 3031 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX PAGE APPENDIX A HISTORY OF THE NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM AT KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT A.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................A-1 A.2 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR AND 0 APPROVED BY THE FAA..................................................................................A-2 ° A.3 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR U) THAT DO NOT REQUIRE FAA APPROVAL....................................................A-10 06 A.4 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR 2 IN THE 1999 NCP APPROVED BY THE FAA.................................................A-13 A.5 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR IN THE 1999 NCP DISAPPROVED BY THE FAA...........................................A-15 A.6 HISTORY AND STATUS OF THE NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM .............A-16 A.7 REFERENCES..................................................................................................A-19 - APPENDIX B AIRCRAFT NOISE 0 CL B.1 AIRCRAFT NOISE..............................................................................................B-1 CL B.2 AIRCRAFT NOISE TERMINOLOGY..................................................................B-1 B.3 EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT NOISE ON PEOPLE ..............................................B-16 B.3.1 Speech Interference.............................................................................B-16 B.3.2 Effect on Children's Learning...............................................................B-17 B.3.3 Sleep Disturbance................................................................................B-18 B.3.4 Vibration from Aircraft Operations........................................................B-20 0 L) B.4 REFERENCES..................................................................................................B-22 APPENDIX C SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION C.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ C-1 N C.2 RESPONSES TO LETTER/EMAIL TO CONSULTED PARTIES...................... C-2 C.3 ONGOING COMMUNICATION WITH CONSULTED PARTIES ....................... C-2 E CA SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................ C-3 C.5 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH DELTA AIRLINES............................. C-4 C.6 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE BUREAU OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION............................................................................................... C-4 C.7 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROLTOWER........................................................................................... C-4 C.8 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY OF KEY WEST PLANNING DEPARTMENT............................................................................... C-4 Page iv Packet Pg. 3032 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF APPENDICES, CONTINUED APPENDIX PAGE C.9 REFERENCES................................................................................................... C-5 APPENDIX D AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES AND PROOF OF PUBLICATION FOR MEETING ADVERTISEMENTS D.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ D-1 D.2 OCTOBER 6, 2020............................................................................................ D-2 D.3 DECEMBER 1, 2020........................................................................................ D-15 0 DAMARCH 2, 2021 ............................................................................................... D-25 D.5 JUNE 1, 2021 ................................................................................................... D-42 U) D.6 OCTOBER 5, 2021 .......................................................................................... D-72 06 D.7 DECEMBER 7, 2021........................................................................................ D-94 2 D.8 MARCH 1, 2022............................................................................................. D-122 D.9 JUNE 7, 2022................................................................................................. D-146 D.10 OCTOBER 4, 2022 ........................................................................................ D-162 APPENDIX E PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 4- 0 E.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................E-1 E.2 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS RECEIVED DURING DEVELOPMENT CL OF THE NEMS....................................................................................................E-1 CL E.2.1 October 6, 2020.....................................................................................E-1 E.2.2 December 1, 2020 .................................................................................E-1 E.2.3 March 2, 2021 ........................................................................................E-2 E.2.4 June 1, 2021 ..........................................................................................E-2 E.2.5 October 5, 2021 .....................................................................................E-2 E.2.6 December 7, 2021 .................................................................................E-3 t0 E.2.7 March 1, 2022........................................................................................E-3 - E.2.8 June 7, 2022 ..........................................................................................E-3 E.3 COMMENTS SUBMITTED DURING PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD......................E-3 EAREFERENCES....................................................................................................E-6 N APPENDIX F NEM REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE DOCUMENTATION F.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................F-1 F.2 REFERENCES....................................................................................................F-2 APPENDIX G LARGE SCALE FLIGHT TRACK MAPS AND NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS G.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................G-1 G.2 REFERENCES...................................................................................................G-1 Page v Packet Pg. 3033 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 2.1 HISTORICAL AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE POPULATION LEVELS......................................... 11 2.2 TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES........................................25 3.1 AIRPORTS AND HELIPORTS WITHIN 25 NM OF EYW..............................................................29 3.2 FLIGHT CORRIDORS WITHIN 25 NM OF EYW ..........................................................................31 3.3 AVERAGE WINDSPEED AT EYW................................................................................................35 4.1 SUMMARY OF DATA SOURCES.................................................................................................46 4.2 FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF FLIGHT OPERATIONS...............................................................47 4.3 DAYTIME VS. NIGHTTIME DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................49 U) 06 4.4 STAGE LENGTH DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................51 U) 4.5 STAGE LENGTH DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................51 4.6 RUNWAY UTILIZATION- DEPARTURES ...................................................................................52 4.7 RUNWAY UTILIZATION-ARRIVALS..........................................................................................52 4.8 BACK TAXI DISTRIBUTION..........................................................................................................53 4.9 STANDING TAKEOFF OPERATIONS..........................................................................................53 4.10 TOUCH-AND-GO OPERATIONS..................................................................................................54 4.11 SUMMARY OF EXISTING FLIGHT OPERATIONS......................................................................66 0 CL 4.12 EXISTING CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES- ACREAGE.....................................68 CL 4.13 EXISTING CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES- HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION..........................................................................................69 5.1 FAA TERMINAL AREA FORECAST FOR EYW FOR 2028..........................................................73 5.2 SUMMARY OF EYW LANDING REPORTS..................................................................................74 5.3 INTERIM AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS .........................................76 5.4 FINAL AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS..............................................76 t0 5.5 FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS...............................................77 5.6 DAYTIME VS. NIGHTTIME DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................79 5.7 STAGE LENGTH DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................80 5.8 RUNWAY UTILIZATION- DEPARTURES ...................................................................................80 cN 5.9 RUNWAY UTILIZATION-ARRIVALS..........................................................................................81 5.10 STANDING TAKEOFF OPERATIONS..........................................................................................81 5.11 TOUCH-AND-GO OPERATIONS..................................................................................................82 5.12 SUMMARY OF FUTURE FLIGHT OPERATIONS ........................................................................83 5.13 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES-ACREAGE .......................................85 5.14 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION..........................................................................................86 6.1 MEMBERS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE..............................................................93 Page vi Packet Pg. 3034 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF TABLES, CONTINUED TABLE PAGE A.1 NUMBER OF HOMES INSULATED IN THE "ORIGINAL" NIP, BY PHASE..............................A-17 A.2 NUMBER OF KWBTS CONDOMINIUMS INSULATED IN THE NIP, BY PHASE.....................A-18 0 U) 06 U) 4- 0 0 CL CL U) a 0 L) cN u Page vii Packet Pg. 3035 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 2.1 GENERAL STUDY AREA.............................................................................................................. 13 2.2 DETAILED STUDY AREA.............................................................................................................. 14 2.3 EXISTING LAND USE ................................................................................................................... 15 2.4 COMMUNITY AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES....................................................................... 16 2.5 HISTORICAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................... 17 2.6 CITY OF KEY WEST FUTURE LAND USE MAP.......................................................................... 18 0 3.1 EYW AIRSPACE............................................................................................................................32 3.2 EYW AIRSPACE LEGEND............................................................................................................33 U) 06 3.3 PUBLISHED RNAV(GPS) RWY 09 APPROACH PROCEDURE.................................................36 U) 3.4 PUBLISHED RNAV(GPS) RWY 27 APPROACH PROCEDURE.................................................37 3.5 PUBLISHED NDB-A APPROACH PROCEDURE.........................................................................38 3.6 ANNUAL WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY.................................................................................39 3.7 MONTHLY WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY, JANUARY—JUNE ............................................40 3.8 MONTHLY WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY, JULY—DECEMBER.........................................41 w 4- 4.1 EAST FLOW AC/AT JET FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT 0 MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................56 0 4.2 EAST FLOW AC/AT PROP FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDTCL MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................57 4.3 EAST FLOW GA JET FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................58 4.4 EAST FLOW GA PROP FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT U) MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................59 4.5 WEST FLOW AC/AT JET FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................60 u 4.6 WEST FLOW AC/AT PROP FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................61 4.7 WEST FLOW GA JET FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT cN MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................62 ; 4.8 WEST FLOW GA PROP FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................63 4.9 HELICOPTERS FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................64 4.10 TOUCH &GO FR24 FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES WITH AEDT MODELED FLIGHT TRACKS AND UTILIZATION........................................................................65 4.11 2022 EXISTING CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE MAP..............................................................70 4.12 COMPARISON OF 2022 EXISTING CONDITION AND 2013 EXISTING CONDITION NOISEEXPOSURE MAPS............................................................................................................71 Page viii Packet Pg. 3036 L.7.b DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF FIGURES, CONTINUED FIGURE PAGE 5.1 2028 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE MAP................................................................88 5.2 COMPARISON OF 2022 EXISTING CONDITION AND 2028 FUTURE CONDITION NOISEEXPOSURE MAPS............................................................................................................89 5.3 COMPARISON OF 2028 FUTURE CONDITION AND 2018 FUTURE CONDITION NOISEEXPOSURE MAPS............................................................................................................90 0 A.1 VOLUNTARY NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES, PILOT HANDOUT PAGE 1...................A-21 A.2 VOLUNTARY NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES, PILOT HANDOUT PAGE 2...................A-22 U) A.3 PROGRAM MITIGATION AREA BASED ON THE YEAR 2003 FUTURE CONDITION NEM...A-23 06 A.4 PHASE 6 BASED ON THE 2005 NOISE CONTOUR UPDATE.................................................A-24 2 A.5 PHASE 7 BASED ON THE 2008 NEM UPDATE.......................................................................A-25 A.6 295 HOMES INSULATED IN THE "ORIGINAL" NIP..................................................................A-26 A.7 185 CONDOMINIUMS INSULATED IN THE KWBTS NIP.........................................................A-27 A.8 296 HOMES INSULATED IN THE NIP.......................................................................................A-28 B.1 COMMON OUTDOOR AND INDOOR SOUND LEVELS.............................................................B-3 0 B.2 COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM SOUND LEVEL (LMax) AND y 0 SOUND EXPOSURE LEVEL (SEL)..............................................................................................B-5 CL CL B.3 TYPICAL RANGE OF OUTDOOR COMMUNITY DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVELS....B-7 B.4 STEP 1: WHAT DID YOU HEAR?................................................................................................B-8 B.5 STEP 2: HOW LOUD IS THAT?...................................................................................................B-9 B.6 STEP 3: HOW LONG DID IT LAST?..........................................................................................B-10 B.7 DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVEL EQUATION................................................................B-11 B.8 STEP 4: HOW OFTEN DID YOU HEAR IT? ..............................................................................B-12 B.9 ANOTHER AIRBUS A-319 LMax SAMPLE MEASUREMENT ON APPROACH.........................B-13 t3) B.10 ANOTHER SOUND EXPOSURE COMPARISON......................................................................B-14 0 B.11 ANOTHER DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVEL SAMPLE CALCULATION.......................B-15 B.12 PERCENT SENTENCE INTELLIGIBILITY FOR INDOOR SPEECH.........................................B-17 B.13 SLEEP DISTURBANCE DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP .................................................B-19 cN B.14 NUMBER OF AWAKENINGS AS A FUNCTION OF MAXIMUM INDOOR NOISE LEVEL .......B-20 G.1 EAST FLOW FLIGHT TRACKS G.2 WEST FLOW FLIGHT TRACKS G.3 2022 NOISE EXISTING CONDITION EXPOSURE MAP GA 2028 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE MAP Page ix Packet Pg. 3037 L.7.c DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS of_ Degrees Fahrenheit AC Air Carrier ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program �- ACS American Community Survey ADIZ Air Defense Identification Zone 0 ADO FAA Airports District Office ADS-B Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast U) 06 AEDT FAA's Aviation Environmental Design Tool U) AGL Above Ground Level AIP Airport Improvement Program AMP Airport Master Plan AMSL Above Mean Sea Level APF IATA Code for Naples Airport - APU Auxiliary Power Unit ARTCC Air Route Traffic Control Center 0 CL ASNA Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act CL ASO FAA's Southern Region Office of Airports, Planning & Programming Branch AT Air Taxi ATCT Airport Traffic Control Tower ATL IATA Code for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport ATO FAA's Air Traffic Organization BCT IATA Code for Boca Raton Airport BEBR Bureau of Economic and Business Research BOCC Board of County Commissioners C FRR.r Code of Federal Regulations CLT IATA Code for Charlotte Douglas International Airport CY Calendar Year(January 1 through December 31) c� CZM IATA Code for Cozumel International Airport dB Decibel o DFW IATA Code for Dallas-Ft Worth International Airport DNL Day-Night Average Sound Level rn DOT Department of Transportation EMAS Engineered Materials Arresting System EWR IATA Code for Newark Liberty International Airport EYW IATA Code for Key West International Airport FAA Federal Aviation Administration Page x Packet Pg. 3038 L.7.c DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, CONTINUED FBO Fixed Base Operator FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDHR Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources �- FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FFY Federal Fiscal Year(The U.S. Government's fiscal year starts on October 1 and ends 0 on September 30 of the following calendar year.) FICON Federal Interagency Committee on Noise FKOHT Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail 06 U) FKOPT Florida Keys Overseas Paddling Trail FLL IATA Code for Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport FMSF Florida Master Site File FMY IATA Code for Page Field Airport (Fort Myers) FR Federal Register W FR24 Flightradar24 0 76 FS or F.S. Florida Statute > 0 FXE IATA Code for Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport 0. FY Fiscal Year(A fiscal year is a twelve-month period chosen by a company to report its financial information.) GA General Aviation GPS Global Positioning System GPU Ground Power Unit U) HELO Helicopter IAD IATA Code for Dulles International Airport IATA International Air Transport Association IFR Instrument Flight Rules IMC Instrument Meteorological Conditions ISM IATA Code for Kissimmee Gateway Airport ITP Initial Testing Phase KWBTS Key West by the Sea cs LC Limited Commercial LDR-C Coastal Low Density Residential LTA Lighter Than Air MCO IATA Code for Orlando International Airport ; MDA Minimum Descent Altitude MIA IATA Code for Miami International Airport MID IATA Code for Manuel Crescencio Rejon International Airport MIL Military MIRL Medium Intensity Runway Lights MPH Miles Per Hour MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization Page A Packet Pg. 3039 L.7.c DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, CONTINUED NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983 NAS Naval Air Station NAS KW Naval Air Station Key West �- NAVAID Navigational Aid NBAA National Business Aircraft Association 0 NCP Noise Compatibility Program NDB Non-Directional Radio Beacon U) 06 NDB-A Non-Directional Beacon Approach U) NEM Noise Exposure Map NIP Noise Insulation Program NLR Noise Level Reduction NM Nautical Mile NOAA National Oceanic&Atmospheric Administration - NORAD North American Aerospace Defense Command NOTAM Notice to Airmen 0 NPIAS FAA's National Plan of Integrated Airports Systems NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWS National Weather Service OPF IATA Code for Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport OPSNET FAA's Operations Network ORD IATA Code for O'Hare International Airport(Chicago) ORL IATA Code for Orlando Executive Airport ORL ADO FAA's Orlando Airports District Office P.L. Public Law PAPI Precision Approach Path Indicator PBI IATA Code for Palm Beach International Airport U) PFC Passenger Facility Charge PROP Single-and Multi-engine (piston) and Turboprop Aircraft RAC Radar Approach/Departure Control �- 0 REIL Runway End Identifier Lights RNAV Area Navigation ROA Record of Approval RPZ Runway Protection Zone RWY Runway SF Single Family SHPO State Historical Preservation Office (or Officer) SID Standard Instrument Departure Page xii Packet Pg. 3040 L.7.c DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, CONTINUED SR State Road STAR Standard Terminal Arrival T&G Touch-and-Go TAF FAA's Terminal Area Forecast TARS Tethered Aerostat Radar System 0 TBD To Be Determined TFMS FAA's Traffic Flow Management System U) 06 TMB IATA Code for Miami Executive Airport U) TPA IATA Code for Tampa International Airport TRACON Terminal Radar Approach Control TRB Transportation Research Board US or U.S United States USC or United States Code '0 U.S.C. o 76 USN United States Navy UTC Coordinated Universal Time 0. VFR Visual Flight Rules VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VOR Very High-Frequency Omni-Directional Radio Range >_ VORTAC Very High-Frequency Omni-Directional Radio Range and a Tactical Air Navigation System 0 U) 0 c� 0 E c� Page xiii Packet Pg. 3041 L.7.d DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE PART 150 PROCESS The Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979(ASNA), signed into law by the President on February 18, 1980, addresses the impact of aircraft noise on communities and ensures continued safety in aviation. Under ASNA, the Secretary of Transportation was charged with the responsibility of establishing a single 0 system to measure aircraft noise at airports, determine noise exposure, and identify compatible land uses. Implementation of noise compatibility planning under the ASNA Act was delegated to the Federal Aviation U) Administration (FAA). The Federal regulation, known as Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, is 06 codified in 14 CFR § 150. The final rule was issued on January 18, 1985 (49 FIR 49260) and has been amended several times. The Part 150 process is a balanced approach for mitigating the noise impacts of z airports upon their neighbors while protecting or increasing both airport access and capacity as well as maintaining the efficiency of the national aviation system. The Part 150 regulation: W 0 • establishes standard noise methodologies and units, • requires use of an FAA-approved model as the standard noise modeling methodology, CL 0 CL • identifies the land uses which normally are compatible or noncompatible with various levels of airport noise, • provides standards for preparing Airport Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) and Airport Noise >_ Compatibility Programs (NCPs) by airport operators, • provides for review of NEMs to ensure compliance with the Part 150 regulations, • provides for review and approval or disapproval of NCP measures submitted to the FAA by 0 airport operators, and • establishes procedures and criteria for making projects eligible for funding as noise projects through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). The NEM is designed to clearly identify an airport's present and future noise patterns and the land uses which are not compatible with those noise patterns. An NEM consists of two maps of the airport with noise contours plotted over land uses, plus supporting documentation. The noise contours for the yearly day- night average aircraft sound levels (DNLs)of 65, 70, and 75 decibels (dB) are shown on these maps. The first map indicates the current conditions and, in effect, identifies the airport's noise compatibility problems. The second map projects the noise contours which can reasonably be predicted five years in the future taking into account changes in land use and in airport operations, plus any improvements in compatibility from noise mitigation actions which may be planned for that five-year period. An NEM is prepared in consultation with the airport's users, the public, local governments, land use control agencies, and the FAA. When reviewed and found in compliance with applicable rules and regulations, an airport's NEM serves as a standard reference to the airport's existing and future noise impacts for anyone proposing noise sensitive Page 1 Packet Pg. 3042 L.7.d DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION development in the vicinity of the airport. Under the Part 150 process, the FAA will indicate, upon receipt and review,whether the NEMs are in compliance with Part 150. If determined to comply,the FAA publishes a notice of acceptance in the Federal Register. The purpose of the NCP for an airport is to show what measures the airport operator has taken or proposes to take to reduce noncompatible land uses and for preventing the introduction of additional noncompatible uses within the area covered by the airport's NEM. The NCP serves as the primary vehicle for guiding and coordinating the efforts and actions of all the agencies and individuals whose combined efforts are essential to achieving the maximum degree of noise compatibility between an airport and its neighbors while taking into account the requirements of the national aviation system. 0 The regulations contained in Part 150 are voluntary and airport operators are not required to participate. U) However, up-to-date Part 150 NEMs and an approved Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)are the 06 primary vehicle for gaining approval of applications for Federal grants for noise mitigation projects. 2 Details of the data and analysis used to develop the NEMs for Key West International Airport (EYW) are Z included in Sections 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 of this document. 1.2 KEY WEST INTERNA TIONAL AIRPORT NEM UPDA TE 4- 0 EYW is owned and operated by Monroe County, Florida. It is located on the southeast corner of the island 76 of Key West, within the city limits of Key West, Florida. In the FAA's National Plan of Integrated Airports 0. Systems (NPIAS), which defines the role of an airport, EYW is classified as a Non-Hub Primary Service 0. airport enplaning more than 10,000 passengers per annum. Monroe County has a long-established goal to provide aviation facilities to all residents and guests in a manner that maximizes safety, convenience, economic benefit, and environmental compatibility. As part of the plan to achieve its goal, Monroe County conducted a Part 150 Study in the mid to late 1990s to explore the impact of aircraft noise on the surrounding community. This Part 150 Study culminated with FAA approval of NEMs and an NCP on May 7, 1999. 0 The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 amended Section 47503(b) of title 49, United States Code. This revision requires airport operators that have submitted NEMs under§47503(a) to submit a revised map to the Secretary of Transportation"if, in an area surrounding an airport,a change in the operation of the airport g would establish a substantial new noncompatible use, or would significantly reduce noise over existing noncompatible uses, that is not reflected in either the existing conditions map or forecast map currently on file with the Federal Aviation Administration.: Updated NEMs shall be required only if the relevant change in the operation of the airport occurs during: (A) the forecast period of the applicable noise exposure map submitted by an airport operator under subsection (a); or (B) the implementation period of the airport operator's noise compatibility program." In addition to required updates to the NEM for the above reasons and in compliance with FAA Order 5100.38, the Airport Improvement Program Handbook, if a NEM is more than five years old and an airport sponsor desires to implement a noise compatibility project from their NCP that is funded by the FAA, the Page 2 Packet Pg. 3043 L.7.d DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION sponsor must provide written confirmation that the NEMs upon which the NCP-related project is based continue to be a reasonable representation of current and/or forecast conditions for the airport. The FAA will not program (i.e., fund) noise compatibility projects using noise exposure maps that are more than five years old unless this process has been completed. To remain in compliance with Part 150 and FAA Order 5100.38, Monroe County has prepared periodic updates to EYW's NEMs. Most recently, on December 19, 2013, the FAA determined that the NEMs submitted by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners were in compliance with the applicable requirements.This current update is necessary due to changes in aircraft operational levels and the aircraft 0 fleet mix operating at the airport. This current update will document if these changes have an influence on the size and shape of the EYW noise contours and will also document if there are any new noncompatible U) land uses within the updated DNL 65+ dB contours. 06 U) Part 150 requires the submission of two maps, an existing condition map and a future condition map. The existing NEM must be based on current data as of the year of submission to the FAA or be representative Z of existing conditions. For this update, the existing condition noise contours are based on data for the average annual day during the 12-month period from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021 (Federal Fiscal Year 2021). As documented in Section 6.7 of this report, the existing condition noise contours are identified and certified by the airport operator as the 2022 Existing Condition NEM. The airport 0 operator has verified and certified that the 2022 Existing Condition NEM accurately represent the existing > 0 condition as of the date of submission of this report to the FAA. CLCL In accordance with Part 150, the future condition NEM must be based on the aircraft operational levels and fleet mix that are forecast to occur at least 5 years after the year of submission. In addition to the operational levels and fleet, the future NEM must be based on reasonable assumptions concerning nighttime >_ operations, flight patterns, airport layout (including any planned airport development), planned land use changes, and demographic changes in the areas surrounding the airport.The Future Condition NEM in this g report utilizes the number of operations for the year 2028 in FAA's 2020 Terminal Area Forecast (TAF)for EYW.The fleet mix is based upon the fleet mix used for the Existing Condition with appropriate adjustments for changes in aircraft types known at this time. As documented in Section 6.7 of this report, the future E condition noise contours are identified and certified by the airport operator as the 2028 Future Condition NEM. g c� In summary,this Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation report documents the methods and data that were used to prepare the 2022 and 2028 NEMs and identifies the compatible and noncompatible land uses within the noise contours. The 2022 and 2028 NEMs are an update to the EYW NEMs that were accepted by the FAA on December 19, 2013. c� 1.3 H/STORYAND SUMMARY OF THE NOISE COMPAT/B/L/TYPLANNING PROCESS AT EYW The objective of the noise compatibility planning process at EYW is to prevent future noncompatible land uses and improve the compatibility between aircraft operations and existing noise-sensitive land uses,while allowing the airport to continue to serve its important role in the community. Numerous operational, land use, and program management alternatives have been evaluated over the course of the noise compatibility Page 3 Packet Pg. 3044 L.7.d DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION planning process at EYW, and the recommended NCP is comprised of several measures aimed at reducing the noise impacts caused by aircraft operations. At the request of the Monroe County Ad Hoc Committee on Noise, a complete history of the noise compatibility planning process at EYW was prepared.Questions regarding this history are frequently asked during the Ad Hoc Committee meetings, and it was felt that easily accessible documentation of this history would be beneficial to the public. Appendix A provides a history of the noise compatibility planning process at EYW beginning with the original Part 150 Study in the mid-1990s. The history of the Noise Insulation Program from its inception in 0 the year 2000 up until the present time is also provided. U) 06 U) 4- 0 76 0 CL CL c� 0 E c� c� Page 4 Packet Pg. 3045 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 3 AIRPORT AND AIRSPACE CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 INTRODUCTION 0 In developing an airport Noise Exposure Map (NEM), as discussed in Section 1.1, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the airport layout and the surrounding airspace. These characteristics U) 06 include existing conditions, as well as any changes that are planned to occur in the future. The Airport U) Master Plan (AMP) is a key document for reference because it assesses the airport's long-range needs and identifies a time frame for addressing those needs. 3.2 AIRFIELD CONFIGURATION Key West International Airport (EYW) is located on the southeast corner of the island of Key West. The 4- 0 FAA 5010 Airport Master Record for EYW indicates the airport reference point, which defines the midpoint of the airfield, is located at 24033'22.031"N Latitude and 81°45'35.841"W Longitude (NAD 83) and the official airport elevation (the highest point on the runway) is 3.4 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The Key West International Airport Master Plan Update, completed in September 2019, includes an inventory of existing conditions in Chapter 2 and describes the capital improvements proposed for the airport through 2035 in Chapter 8. The following information is from the Airport Master Plan Update. Runway 09-27, the only runway at EYW, is 5,075 feet long and 100 feet wide. Runway 09-27 consists of an asphalt overlay on asphalt concrete pavement and is able to accommodate aircraft weighing up to 195,000 pounds, including commercial jets, turboprops, military aircraft, and large general aviation aircraft (e.g., business jets). The runway was originally 4,801 feet long, but a project was completed in 2017 to increase the departure length of Runway 09 by approximately 274 feet, to 5,075 feet. This was U accomplished by using existing overrun pavement. CL Runway 09-27 is equipped with runway end identifier lights (REIL)to aid in identifying the approach end of the runway. The REIL system consists of a pair of synchronized flashing lights located laterally on each side of the runway threshold. When the airport traffic control tower(ATCT) is closed (between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.), the REILs and medium intensity runway lights (MIRL) can be activated by pilots CL using the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency 118.200. This ability for pilots to activate runway lights is common at airports. , Visual glide slope indicators aid pilots in judging the correct approach slope of the aircraft toward the g touchdown zone of a runway. Precision approach path indicators (PAPIs) are a system of lights that may be visible for up to 5 miles during the day and up to 20 miles or more at night. PAPI systems use light units that are installed in a single row of either two or four light units. Each set of lights is designed to appear as either white or red, depending upon the approach angle. When the pilot is approaching the lights at the proper angle, the first set of lights appears white, and the second set appears red. When both sets appear white, the pilot is flying too high, and when both appear red, the pilot is flying too low. Runway 09-27 has a four-light PAPI system located at each runway end. Page 27 Packet Pg. 3046 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION The taxiway system provides access between the runway and various aircraft parking aprons throughout the airfield. Currently,the Taxiway A reaches the previous end of Runway 09 (the location prior to the 2017 extension) and pilots that want to use the full 5,076 feet of available runway length must back-taxi on the runway. Back-taxiing is when an aircraft taxies on a runway in the opposite direction of the aircraft's take- off or landing direction. This occurs when the taxiway does not extend to the end of the runway—which is 0 the case at EYW. There are three anticipated changes in airfield configuration between the existing condition NEM (2022) U) 06 and the future condition NEM (2028).The first change is the extension of Taxiway A to the west to provide U) full-length taxiway access to the extended Runway 09 end. This full-length parallel taxiway will enable aircraft departing to the east on Runway 09 to use the entire runway without the need to back-taxi on the runway. The second change is the provision of an additional 5,000 square yards of aircraft parking apron west of the existing west apron. This additional apron will accommodate an estimated 45 single-engine aircraft, 4 multi-engine aircraft, and 4 small jets. The third change is the expansion of the commercial W terminal apron to accommodate additional aircraft during peak periods and during special events. 0 3.3 AIRSPACE/AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES 0 CL CL Airport facilities, flight services, and restricted and special use airspace associated with an aircraft in flight were considered in the airspace inventory. Factors inventoried included: • military installations; • public and private airports and heliports; • civil and military flight corridors; • navigational and visual aids applicable to EYW; U) • military restricted and operational areas; 0 U • special use airspace; and c� • landing approaches to the airport. CL E Airspace features and air traffic control procedures that occur within 25 nautical miles (nm) of EYW are listed and described as follows. 3.3.1 Neighboring AirportsCL C Airports within 25 nautical miles(nm)of EYW included on the FAA VFR Miami Sectional Aeronautical Chart (August 12, 2021) are shown on Figure 3.1. The only heliport within 25 nm of EYW is the Florida Keys Memorial Hospital Heliport. Airport and heliports within 25 nm of EYW are listed in Table 3.1. g c� c� Page 28 Packet Pg. 3047 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 3.1 AIRPORTS AND HELIPORTS WITHIN 25 NM OF EYW Distance and Direction from EYW Name Code Ownership Distance Initial 0 Heading Florida Keys Memorial Hospital Heliport 7FA0 Private 2 nm 27° (NE) NAS Key West/Boca Chica Field NQX U.S. Navy 4 nm 75°(E) 6 Sugar Loaf Shores Airport 7FA1 Private 11 nm 61°(NE) Summerland Key Cove Airport FD51 Private 18 nm 71° (E) Source: Great Circle Mapper, 2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates 3.3.2 Operational Procedures 0 Operational procedures within EYW airspace are subject to certain restrictions due to the proximity of NAS 0 Key West. EYW and NAS Key West airspace overlaps as shown on Figure 3.1. Operations within each CL airspace are coordinated by the NAS Key West Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and radar approach/departure control (RAC) personnel. Aircraft landing at EYW are handed off from NAS Key West ATCT to EYW ATCT personnel once there is no conflict with other traffic. The EYW ATCT is staffed and operational from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. NAS Key West ATCT and RAC facilities are operational from 7:00 a.m. to midnight. They interface with the Miami Air Route Traffic 0 Control Center(ARTCC). The ARTCC provides airspace services to the combined airspace from midnight to 7:00 a.m. All ATCT and radar facilities are operational seven days a week. U) 0 According to the EYW ATCT Manager, an airspace delineation boundary has been established to identify U overlapping airspace. Specific procedures are to be followed during visual meteorological conditions (VMC) and instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). During VMC, civil aircraft departing from Runway CL 9 are required to make a left turn and stay west of the boundary. Military aircraft stay east of the delineation boundary used by the ATCT. During IMC, NAS Key West ATCT and radar approach/departure control personnel provide position and altitude data to all aircraft. Departures from EYW are held whenever an instrument approach under IFR conditions is being conducted to either EYW or NAS Key West runways. CL The EYW ATCT Manager provided further explanation of the interaction between EYW and NAS KW. The ATCT Manager stated that a restriction is placed on aircraft departing on Runway 09 (and Runway 27 if 0 applicable) regarding the aircraft's climb profile. The 2000 ft restriction on the initial altitude for instrument departures was instituted by the previous Navy ATC Officer NAS Key West. That is the altitude that the Navy departure controller protects along the route of flight that the airplane will follow. THE NAS KW ATC must separate all (Navy) air traffic from the route and altitude of the Key West departure as it quickly gets into Navy airspace immediately after taking off from Key West Runway 09. It is the same for Key West E airplanes departing off Runway 27.Once the NAS KW ATC sees that departure on radar and radar identifies it and gets in radio contact with the departure, the NAS KW ATC will issue further climb instructions based on the traffic at that point. EYW ATC would like the Navy to change that maximum initial altitude to a higher Page 29 Packet Pg. 3048 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION value. NAS KW ATCs are authorized to give EYW ATCs a higher initial altitude upon request if there is no conflicting traffic. Operating characteristics within the airspaces are as follows: Overlapping Airspace - A line of demarcation has been established as shown on Figure 3.1 to define areas of operation in the overlapping airspace. 0 VMC Conditions—During visual meteorological conditions(VMC),civil aircraft departing EYW from Runway 09 are required to make a left turn and stay west of the line. Military aircraft U) 06 stay east of the line by making their approaches on radials from the NAS Key West Runway U) 8 threshold when landing on that runway. IMC Conditions — During instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), NAS Key West ATCT and RAC personnel provide position and altitude data to all aircraft. Departures from EYW are held whenever an instrument approach under IFR conditions is made to either EYW or NAS Key West runways. Warning Areas - NAS Key West and EYW airspace is adjacent to the Air Defense Identification 0 Zone (ADIZ), the United States Defense Area, and numerous warning areas outside of FAA 76 jurisdiction and over international waters. Traffic from the north and northeast is routinely 0 routed clear of warning areas. The U.S. Navy states that some warning areas are used for CL CL high-speed aerial combat training including surface-to-air and air-to-air missile firings and anti- aircraft gunnery. Balloons — Up to two Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) Balloons, colloquially known as >_ "Fat Alberts," are located 14 nm northeast of the airport. They are tethered to the ground with a large wire. The restricted airspace is a circular area 4 statute miles in diameter effective from the surface to 14,000 feet MSL, centered at lat. 24°42'03"N., long. 81°30'29"W, and is 0 designated Restricted Area R-2916, Cudjoe Key, FL. The using agency is currently the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Air and Marine Operations Center. The primary mission for the balloons is to provide low-level radar surveillance in the Florida Straits. The radar assists federal agencies in a national drug interdiction program. The secondary mission is to provide t0 North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)with low-level surveillance coverage for air sovereignty in the Florida Straits. CL 3.3.3 Flight Corridors Low altitude Federal Airways in the vicinity of EYW, are shown on Figure 3.1 and are listed in Table 3.2. Low altitude Federal Airways are corridors defined by radials between very high frequency omnidirectional 0 radio range (VOR) ground radio stations. They provide navigational guidance to aircraft that are equipped p with onboard equipment capable of receiving signals from those stations. 0 c� c� Page 30 Packet Pg. 3049 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 3.2 FLIGHT CORRIDORS WITHIN 25 NM OF EYW Flight Corridor From To Bearing (°) Low Altitude Federal Airways V225 Key West VOR EYW Lee County VORTAC 360° 0 V539 Key West VOR EYW Lee County VORTAC 015° V157 Key West VOR EYW Miami VOR 037° 06 V3 Key West VOR EYW Miami VOR 082° V601 Key West VOR EYW Pahokee VOR 019° B646 Key West VOR EYW Marathon NDB NA International Airways G765 Cozumel VOR CZM Key West VOR EYW NA 0 B646 Merida VOR MID Key West VOR EYW NA Note: NA Not Available 0. CL VOR Very High-Frequency Omni-Directional Radio Range VORTAC Very High-Frequency Omni-Directional Radio Range and a Tactical Air Navigation system NDB Non-Directional Radio Beacon EYW Key West International Airport CZM Cozumel International Airport MID Manuel Crescencio Rejon International Airport,formerly known as Merida-Rejon Airport Source: FAA VFR Miami Sectional Aeronautical Chart(August 12, 2021) Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates 0 U) a 0 U c� 0 M 0 c� c� Page 31 Packet Pg. 3050 r W L.7.f Ln 10 Z Cn • a O p r " q 0 •, a z N •• r r • a a �, a F- •m a " 1� , rr• W a �, y , r 0 as 3 r as LLJ � r 00 0 " /�,7 � r a F Lu s�qq r u. r � a "' +fir, C14 ma C "�° W a � � p • Z a <Ar tua r06 Al •••raaw•aaa••r•aa•r••aa .- 2^r M �'��. _� 0 " �y "a•. ,.. �'d Tu •aa 9�"` r• �w 1, 5,�, M rar rr rn O r-iaar LIJ 00ar _i "» c� r " I < r " QLul " at a a +¢y� a � r C? „i u 0 CL U Q N f/ L CD� WA ,,mo�ww,' p 6J "% Q Q E LLB LLL.JJLJJI a ZCo % o C�1 "p U) o I a �a••a�•a«••a z 06 O C J ds �. �/�r� Cl C. w V u0 ::. CO O , Cy Cms o_V o� m a 0 • • • ;. • • • • • ,�, • °C 0 m • �� m a�a �' �I °• C U+� � r CM a a o CL aaNl� • " r rco m / /kIClN11i4M I-- / a r a r u ~O a COLrra r a z In • « • r r r J o KZ I & ° r � Z z • 4 ro:; ra u ar r r ca u ®• • r O IN L a V GA C"•d a�a • o"r GA T" r"" •a® (n C5 J O "r" LZ o' O a• wr a + a+ a o a z N LL a N a 00 r • M a q r 00 ar k Lu � � as J aim • FIGURE a 0 z ®"a a 0 °00 • a 3.1 rr s > O ra � � • W Ma • h I •aaa ": a r a • a N o Packet Pg. 3051 Airporls having Control Towews are shown in 51ue,all others in Magente,Consult Chart Sbpo drnent for detift involving airport L.7.f lighting,navigation aids,and services.Ali dries are local.For additional symbol W60FfnabOrE Feller to the Chart User's Guide. AIRPORTS AIRPORT DATA Other than hard,dirt aced seapialle Base Box indicates FAR 93 FSS ,-,FAR 51 �rjjt,W�-yg 0 0 It Spoclat Air Traffic \ NO SVFR Lucaflon Identifiver C Rules&Airpar4 TCIL M Ej(NAM)1PNAM) -lCAC, 0 0 flarrf-swlaced ainwatys t500 ft,to 8009 ft, in loritph Tr,,,jffpc Patterns, EN'�N e' Locafion Rurwisys with CT- 118,3 ATIS 123,81 lindi Gabor Hard-surfac*d runwar%greltor thnn 80439 It.or RoWit Traffic 285 L 72 1VZ9,15 silowncouTsitia Patterns(publk,use) f1p '\ onre rnullple,runways ic,x�1141n 8 Et.,, , 2'3,3 conug 4 ou[As U'S. 1110 1 1% *NSF Special VFR Ad:VSY 125�.01 UNIICOM Whin harti-surfaced runway conditions ex�sl g indicates approxirnate YOH, -sae supptemeni- WX CAM-Woaffiry Canrrara(AK) Von-.DME,WE or VORTAC location. FSS-Flight swNico 0 ,st,,tan AOE-AirportofEntry All r4 44]gr0ab le hard urfacod rurlwayk4 irreluding lhoso Closed,we NO svrn-Fix�d-wjnc g special VFR flight is prol,libitod- LU U- stirlwo for v1sual Ajoports may be pubfif,,or private, CT- 1183-Control Towcv l(,T)-pricnary I'mque.ocy z * -Star Indicalez operation part-Wne.See tower frequencies 0 ADDITIONAL AIRPORT INFORMATION tabulabon for riours of operation. Privakti"(PA)"-Non publjr:uge hawrig ornertioncy or Follows the Commort Traffic Advii&Ory Frequency,(CTAF) (D uNWIT13irk value ATIS 123.8 Aulomatic Torinin,W fillonnathorl servNco U) (00 Military-OthGr Il ian hard-suglaced�all n0tary wvports AFIS 135.2 Aularnafic FP1,ght InWirnahon,Service(AK) are kfentdied by abbreviations AFIB,NAS,AAF,file, ASOS/AWOS 135A2 -Auloaial�.il Sur iace Weather 06 Obstrviril,]Sysiears(Mwwn veherc i0l-hrne A RS not avaiiable), U) Same Wj1 ASAW0S tadnoties may not be located at aorpods, z UNICOM-AeroniulirW advicmry-Oallon Hefiporl Linverlied Abandoned-paved Ultualight 0 Splarled having landmark val"e, Flfght,Paoli VFR Adv:,;y-VFR Advasopy Survice shown where fiull-ihne ArIS z 0000 Ill,or grealer S�Wclod Tot available and frequency is other than proi nary CT ffisclie"cy, 0%, U) 285 Vawmclri in root il 0 0$)1`1 L tAgWing in operation Sunset to Sunuse 'L 1-ighling Iknitaanlons exisir refer to Sopplerneril. > Fuel availabifily 4Wucaqod by use of UcR stark,s around basic 72 Lenqffi of runway in bundreds ol'feet; Uj airporltymhol,C{,nmull Supple rnorit Ear dolallaand avalllbiNty 1-19aWe length may be less, W aiTpQrIs with harri-54jr(aood runwayx greater than$09 A, Mien inforipatimi j5',lacking,the ruspvctivo character Is roplaced W ry tt lacy dash I-AgIrling codes refou to runway edge hglii:s and inay 4- lick represent tho longest rurmay or lull leligili lighting. 0 OBJECTIONABLE-Airport inay advcrauly aflocI ajNIMCC US0. -ra 0 > 0 AIRPORT TRAFFIC COMMUNICATION BOXES L- CL SERVICE AND 123.6 12ZI5 CL AIRSPACE INFORMATION OAKDALE Only the conlr0lodand rrnwrv"I Wir p r11 362* M, OAK a Uj offrictivri turflow 18,00011,"St arashuaw'n, Underline indleates licavy fine trox odicafos Flight Sejvire,Siation Ia,SSj. rio vnic*evil frettm"Ficy. Frequencies 192,2 and 2MA(Conlerrniri,ous U Sj, Z Class C A4space(Mode C� 121,5,122,2,P43,0 and 255A tAlastkw�,and 121,5, LU W ori FAR 91,21 WA11K) NO/-Croesbatd)InWcatrra sibutdown stal"& t 26'7 end 2,110(Canada)are avaieilbla at ginany Class D Airspace Olaorata!��loss Ill. Fss'sano are not showil,above hoxeq- Z) - CoMing of C]ass D Airspaor,in All other hequenclos are shown. U) r .1 hurWredis Of feet(A continuoups,or0n-Rarjuest. LU C: W 40 value,Ind"t"surfsee ulp to but A,90,1WAWOS 0 L 3 R-Frecrive only — not Including that value,) ———— Clus E W0 Airspace 122J R Frequencies above thin line box are rernoled to Crass E Airspace wfth floor NAVAID silo-Other FSS fipqiowicies prowrfing 700 ft.above surface fli'llat F VZl� rijay rAe 88L ,ov�1 In ret, F��I A Ml detorrilined by�.Whhjdo and terrart Consullt U) CLASS G laterally aburts Clas�s 0 Alespaoia. c0mirijimcation Supplomom tar complain unornintion, z0"s E AlmfiRca Mill floor L) 0 7DO ft,,above surface that RADIO AIDS TO NAVIGATION U Uj lateraily abutsa 1200 R,or r6gher 0) Uses E Akspace 0. VHF OMNI RANGE(VORI vo,n'rAG Q U 75 Class E Akspace YMb floor VOF_DME 0 L)ME 014,11 lalililws,P�o�,FSS 0010f, L) 10 1200 ft.or greater above surface AG6,WX CAM(AK) CL Z) &Elm that laterally abuts Class G hiee supplolnelrli��eto. -n 0 24DO MSL Differentiates noomo Nlyu ifftfl000f f Adj goal, NDB,DME Ho ' mmAff`aa`9F&ee;i Cia,"EAAspa"�agreatof INDS) MSL z 0 4500 Class E Avspacrl.cxistsal 120WAGI,unless 0 othe'twise lesignated as shown abavu OBSTRUCTIONS Claa15 F AErspaQc low Wiiiu0l�Fedwal Airways 1000 ft anrl higher AGL 0 LU CL and RNAV 2 Roukes area indicated by canter line Wind LL Interseoflon-Arrows are directed towards TurlDine Wlr�d'rurlbirle facililies which astabiish intersection,N Above 200 ft Fa ri ii� 'iowp Obs below 1000 ft ACL G Frovalvorl oT Me A bb 290 ft AGL tair abovo inerl"son level ry Tolal milr�,,age belwemu—DE ill,UIT've.111".rea') Height above ground 2049 z 9= NAVAIDs ui)diked Airways Under consErticbLin or .2 Opartod:posiffinn and--UC 0 (Helkopteo RNAV M. , Obstrachon with nieva lion onveritmd Only) Waypo6rh nigiN.interwity llghts; NOTMC:City Mres may L) Prohibited,flestrirted, may operate park time extend:owmard from smiclures, LU UldlldiLdidlU andrl aWeflaarnn AuCI,vAj�,eay�Danger, MISCELLANEOUS l and Restv cl ed Arcts STADIUM Space Launch 21M= 'Alort Area and MlldarV linfor miftent TFR�;il:e Aclivily Area Operations Area IMONl # Wrid Act as do meal 0xiend into C Nags A,El,C [Wolh in 3 W,vla to E and D 1 ".rs, -urfac A,-Aoirobat�c practice Area Ind 3000'AGL) Pace, )rC11,',issEajpuit& 'o (Son SuppWriont) gor c Ulm SpacjW Airport Triffic,Area G-Gilder Opera lgolrj�j 0 Moline U91 it 1 OE— �s` (Spe- 93 for ceinil S) 2020"VALME) H-Hang Gilder AuflvAy Naliajlal Defense Air ice U Ultialiglit Activi1V Temporary rlight Resfiriclion UA Unvriannoct Alroraft Aclivily VPXYZ NAME An,gj, 1<4 - ing JIIP VFR Waypornts (VPXYZ) A01Z°Air Defense T T/ paraolutoAunp Identflicatirm Zone ArRla &ioplorlulnt, WWX C (Ste FAR 91,21 WAIM.) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 01110 11M N at ona I See arty Area 1011111110000101112M Terminal Radar Smice 4-1- Power Transmission Lim — Mountain Pass FIGURE � 11823 Elevation of Pass) Area 7RSM ------d Aerial Cable Pass symbol does not Indicate a recommended 3.2 —tR2411, ,MTR-Military o L Lookout Tower route or direction of flight rand pass elievatinn Training Route 618(Elevation Base,of Tower) does not Indloate a genornmanded clearance aftitude.Hazaidous Ilight conditions may exist Nvi1bin and near mountain jarmes, Packet Pg. 3052 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 3.3.4 Existing Published Procedures EYW currently has two published Area Navigation (RNAV) global positioning system (GPS) non-precision approaches, one to each runway end, and a nondirectional beacon (NDB) circling approach to either runway end, as shown on Figures 3.3 through 3® . A non-precision instrument approach is one in which the pilot uses only horizontal navigational guidance to line the aircraft up with the runway. When flying such 0 an approach, the pilot proceeds along the specified course and descends to the minimum descent altitude (MDA) while locating the runway. If the runway (or runway environment) is in sight, the pilot may land; U) 06 otherwise, the pilot must execute a missed approach. U) Existing published approaches (current as of August 12, 2021)to EYW, available to aircraft operators after obtaining clearance from the U.S. Navy approach control and the EYW ATCT, include the following: RN" (GPS) to Runway 09 - These approaches allow straight-in and circling approaches to Runway 09. The straight-in approach to Runway 09 has a minimum decision altitude (MDA) of 580 feet and visibility of 1 mile for approach categories A and B, an MDA of 580 feet and visibility of 1.5 miles for approach category C, and an MDA of 580 feet and visibility of 1.75 0 miles for approach category D. Circling approaches with an MDA of 580 feet and a visibility of 76 1 mile are allowed for approach category A and B, an MDA of 580 feet and visibility of 1.5 miles 0 for approach category C, and an MDA of 620 feet and 2 miles visibility for approach category CL CL D are allowed. RN" (GPS) to Runway 27 - These approaches allow straight-in and circling approaches to Runway 27. The straight-in approach to Runway 27 has an MDA of 420 feet and visibility of 1 mile for approach categories A and B and an MDA of 420 feet and visibility of 1.25 miles for W approach categories C and D. Circling approaches with an MDA of 500 feet and a visibility of U) 1 mile are allowed for approach category A and B, an MDA of 500 feet and visibility of 1.5 miles a 0 for approach category C, and an MDA of 620 feet and 2 miles visibility for approach category D are allowed. NDB or GPS-A-This provides for a circling approach to EYW with an MDA of 500 feet and visibility of 1 mile for approach categories A and B, an MDA of 500 feet and visibility of 1.5 miles for t0 approach category C, and an MDA of 620 feet and 2-mile visibility for approach category D. The NDB-A instrument approaches to EYW are conducted using the following navigational aids. CL o Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC)- Key West VORTAC, 113.5 Channel 82 EYW. o Non-Directional Beacon (NDB)- Fish Hook(FIS) NDB, 332 FIS. CL There are no published Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) or Standard Instrument Departure (SID) Procedures for EYW. M 0 3.4 METEOROLOGICAL DATA The Florida Keys are a chain of islands that swing in a southwesterly arc from the southeast coast of the Florida peninsula, with the island of Key West being located near the western end this chain. Due to the nearness of the Gulf Stream in the Florida Straits, and the tempering effects of the Gulf of Mexico, the Florida Keys have a notably mild, tropical-maritime climate. Diurnal temperature variations throughout the year range about 10 degrees. Winter cold fronts tend to be modified by the warm water as they move in from the north, keeping monthly average temperatures typically only 15 degrees lower in the winter than during the summer. Page 34 Packet Pg. 3053 L.7.f DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION December through April, referred to as the dry season, receives roughly 25 percent of the annual rainfall, usually ahead of cold fronts. June through October is considered the wet season, receiving approximately 60 percent of the yearly rainfall total in showers and thunderstorms. Easterly waves during this season occasionally bring excessive rainfall, while infrequent hurricanes may be accompanied by unusually heavy amounts as well. 0 The climate in the vicinity of EYW is strongly influenced by the prevailing easterly trade winds, the proximity of the Gulf Stream, and the Gulf of Mexico. According to the National Weather Service in Key West, based U) 06 on data from 1991 through 2020,the annual average temperature in Key West was 78.9°F,with an average U) annual maximum temperature of 83.7°F and an annual average minimum temperature of 74°F. Prevailing easterly winds ranged from 8.9 to 11.5 miles per hour(mph),with an annual average of 10.4 mph, as shown , in Table 3.3. Maximum winds usually occur from October through April and originate from the east/northeast. The annual wind direction frequency is shown on Figure 3® . Average wind direction frequency by month is shown on Figures 3.7 and 3.8. W 4- TABLE 3.3 0 AVERAGE WIND SPEED AT EYW 0 1970-2016 Average: Miles per hour(MPH) Annual 10.4 January 11.2 February 11.1 U) March 11.5 0 April 11.5 0 May 10.3 U) a June 9.5 0 t3 July 8.9 August 9 September 9.1 October 10.5 November 11.5 CL December 11.1 Source: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Key West, FL, 2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates y 0 0 c� Page 35 Packet Pg. 3054 L.7.f O KEY WEST,FLORIDA AL-606(FAA) 21224 WAAS APP CPS Rwy Idg 4W1 CH 40405 TDZE 3 RNAV (GPS) RWY 9 a w W109A Dw° Apt Elev 3 KEY WEST INTL(EYW) W RNP APCH-GPS. 4 MISSED APPROACH:Climb � For uncompensated Bora-VNAV systems,LNAV/VNAV NA below-15'C or above to 3000 direct BURPY and a 48°C.Rwy 9 helicopter risibility reduction below'/SM NA.If local altimeter via 077'track to GUCEL W © setting not received,use Key West NAS/Boca Chico Fld altimeter soiling. and hold. Z 0 ASR ATIS NAVY KEY WEST APP CON* KEY WEST TOWER* GND CON CLINIC DEL I UNICOM W 119.675 124.025 313.7 118.2(aAF)O 257.8 121.9 121.9 122.95 Z U) 06 z W1748 4STING 1 STRAP Procedure NA for arrivals �° at STRAP R-2916 � ?�3q,1 via Y157 northeast bound. 00 . 14000 Procedure NA For arrivals ! > (IAF) at STING CHETS via V225 northbound. w CAUTION.Balloon and cable to 1 d,000 >- in restricted area. 0 0 co O Key West NAS/ W 0� > W-174E (FAF) Barn Chid Fld 077° O cn BUSBY RW09 /.1185 . Q m 1500 320 ••, ,.�,••••� o Q w093° ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.,, N W U n� AT(NAYV (6.5) 311 143 BURPY w (� MISSED APCH FIX o �- No GUCE"267 N = as _ o V 2 o `'•p67°�•- N ICD �aW09gs 5 NM a O MAO, r z15000 W-174C C6 d w s ® a 75 ELEV 3 p TDZE 3 o CL U � O Procedure 3000 BURPY GUCEL Turn 0 NA ATNAW BUSBY Ir a Cl) 1500 093°� Rwo9 GP3.00 1LL 500 RW09 I 5ovax,00 Q 6-1NM d.5 NM 79 1 CATEGORY A B c D Q LPV DA 253-1 250(300-1) LU VNAV DA 425-1!6 422(5DD 1�h) J LNAV MDA 580-1 577(600-1) 580-IIA 580-1 577(600-1'h) 577(60D-1%) Q CIRCLING 580-1 577(600 1) 620-13/4 620-2 MIRL Rwy 9-270 a 617(700-13/] 617(700-2) REIL Rwys 9 and 27 O KEY WEST,FLORIDA 24°33'N 81°46'W KEY WEST INTL(EYW) Amdt lA 15JUL21 RNAV (GPS) RWY 9 FIGURE 3.3 Source:Federal Aviation Administration. (12 Aug 2021 to 09 Sep 2021). SE-3. KEY WEST INTL (EYW) RNAV(GPS) RWY 27. Packet Pg. 3055 L.7.f O KEY WEST,FLORIDA AL-606(FAA) 21224 WAAS APP CR5 TRwyDZ Idg 4801 RNAV (GPS) RWY 27 a w CHW227 p 273o Apt Elev 31KEY WEST INTL(EM W RNP APCH-GPS. MISSED APPROACH:Climb to 2400 0 When local altimeter setting not received,use Key West NAS/Boca direct ATNAW and via 003°Irack 0 Chow Fid r setting.Rwy 27 helicopter visibility reduction to CHETS and hold. LULL ASR O AT1S NAVY KEY WEST APP CON* KEY WESTTOWER* GND CON I CWC DEL UNICOM 119.675 124.025 513.7 118.2(CrAF)O 257.8 121.9 121.9 122.95 W F U) AgW 27 2$ Procedure NA for arrivals at CARNU Z 06 CARNU on V157 northwsst bound. U) z 15000 W O U) R-291b 140 4 W W CHETS O W� O ( > rw GUCEL ��`�, �- CL 5 NM Key Wed HAS/ CL Bcm Chico Fld �0"7°- a U w y ...................'w 4A170 7� 1500 81 to Q c ......................A......... �'--�-273° o N 320 RW27 (FAF) (6.51 (IF) o ATNAW i KEYCY BURPY _ CDU U) �/ O (V 2 Q I a O M r z N C a 0 0 w s a 75 ELEV 3 Qi TDZE 3 0 N CL U W 174C < O 0 2400 ATNAW CHETS VGSI and RNAV glidepoth not coincident j 003° (VG51 Angle 3.00/TCH 34). p ure a C LL T tr KEYCY BURPY Tum NA .� e 5076 x I DO I 0 730 1500 QCV RW27 9= 0 ' 1500 Z g ��71 GP 3.00° � 273'to TiCH 45 0 RW27 d.i i IM &B NM W CATEGORY A B C D =Cn ; LPV DA 253-1 250(300-1) 0 J LNAV MDA 460-1 457 00-11 460-1% 457(500.1sifa) m 0 MIRL Rwy 9 27 a CIRCLING 500-1 A97 500-1 620-13/4 620-2 a REIL Rwys 9 and 27Q ( ) 617 700-13/4 617 2 KEY WEST,FLORIDA 24°33'N 81°d6' KEY WEST INTL(EM W Orig-C 15JUL21 RNAV (GPS) RWY 27 FIGURE 3.4 Source:Federal Aviation Administration. (12 Aug 2021 to 09 Sep 2021). SE-3. KEY WEST INTL (EYW) RNAV(GPS) RWY 9. Packet Pg. 3056 L.7.f O KEY WEST,FLORIDA AL-606(FAA) 21224 NDB FI5 APP CR5 % Idg NIA TDZE NDB-A NIA a w 332 0710 1 Apt Elev 9 KEY WEST INTL(EYW) W Q MISSED APPROACH:Climbing left turn to 1500 via heading ASR 360°,then left turn direct FIS NDB and hold. Z ATIS NAVY KEY WEST APP CON* KEY WESTTOWER* GND CON CWC DEL UNICOM 119.675 124.025 31li 11&2(CTAF)Q 257.8 121.9 121.9 122.95 19 Z 6 U) z 14000 0 n j4 j KEY WEST ! R-2916 �at,n 113.5 EYW Chan 82 Uj 1500 W O IAF 160 2.4) CAUTION.Balloon and cable to 14,000 0 HOOK ,.•,� in restricted area. ra FFISH 32 F15 — f 0- m = n185 0 CL U 324n:: t a W ,. LU w n „q a•1 � = t� W N �► o W LU rya o (� U) U) I o a cn r a 2 U) z N m U C w s dia 75 5�1 k5 25 ELEV 3 a CL U ® a 0 :~-270* a a 0 ® 00 m pL 0 sa76x10o 1 Z LL •o �, FI5 1500 1 I5 Q Remain NDB LL within 10 NM 071° 1.2 NM 79 71 = e 2 hdg 360° From FAF 1500 J m 01-7 4 a x�•••"'•••,• MIRL Rory 9-270 REIL"9 and 270 cnTt cOtr A s c o FAF to MAP 1.2 NM CIRCLING 500-1 497(500-1) 62o-13/4 620-2 KnolS 1 60 1 90 1120 1150 1 180 ' 617 -1 s/a 617 2 Min-Sec 1:12 0:48 0:36 0:29 0:2A KEY WEST,FLORIDA 24°33`N 81°46`W KEY WEST INTL(EM Amdt 15D 15JUL21 NDB-A FIGURE 3.5 Source:Federal Aviation Administration. (12 Aug 2021 to 09 Sep 2021). SE-3. KEY WEST INTL (EYW) NDB-A. Packet Pg. 3057 L.7.f I � a W � 0 Annual Wired Direction n Frequency � � Z W � Z � 06 z 0 NNW NNE V) %d NW NE � W w 0 NW ENE ra H 0 UW E w � v m z WSW � ESE M CY w I � Sw SE w Ss SSE o P S 0 LU p % Fre+quency o z LL o a z z a E Source: US Department of Commerce,National Oceanic&Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service,Key West,FL FIGURE 3.6 Packet Pg. 3058 L.7.f � �. tu; "'.^ �� . w LL ° ' e ,�J� ,,.. Z 06 cu L Wa) w 0 O ra 0 L z `1 1 O w w N Lu ,,, ,,� ��..� .'`............ "�I� ,. „ . C LL L Lu 76 Lu 75 0 U p v a E p Z Z a � � CL Q E CV CL Wi ul „ p d mury � cr LL X� ;2 i �- FIGURE 3.7 Packet Pg. 3059 L.7.f TCIL � p ,,, �� r mh F lu r F 4y W M Z �( J d" w� w dF�r r C W LL " �� `a z QV � a Z 06 Cu ui a 0 ' > r6 0 z CL - wu WWk- WV,G =o WYVN CL U WW u l � LLJ wk E J, Lit Lu i8? Z C e � d L— Z3 �� ' '49 Z m LLJ � 'r t„> I j C Z w U v E 0 u Z J CL 1 O LL C E CV a 2 0 a) H µ w ice„ Z aV mpe I� rJ , h" `' ,, Rr Js '� �5 17 P P ,r FIGURE 3.8 Packet Pg. 3060 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 5 FUTURE CONDITION: YEAR 2028 NOISE EXPOSURE 0 5.1 INTRODUCTION U) The evaluation of the future year 2028 airport noise environment at the Key West International Airport 06 (EYW)was completed using the methods and standards developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and published in Title 14 CFR part 150 (Part 150). The regulation requires that the cumulative noise energy exposure of individuals to noise resulting from aviation activities be established in terms of yearly day - night average sound level (DNL) as the FAA's primary metric. All detailed noise analyses must be performed using the most current version of the FAA's Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT). For this NEM, AEDT Version 3d was used to model aircraft noise exposure, as described in more detail in 0 Section 4.1. > 0 The noise analysis described in this section was conducted to reflect future (i.e., forecast) conditions. This analysis includes maps to depict land uses within the DNL contours. The inclusion of flight tracks is helpful in illustrating where aircraft normally fly. The following information will be disclosed for the future (i.e., forecast) conditions: • The number of people living or residences within each noise contour above DNL 65 for the Future Condition Noise Exposure Map (NEM). 0. • The location and number of noise sensitive uses (e.g., schools, churches, hospitals, parks, recreation areas) exposed to DNL 65 or greater for the Future Condition NEM. 0 0 • Mitigation measures in effect or proposed and their relationship to the Future Condition NEM. 00 cN 5.2 METHOD FOR DEVELOPING FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS N Most of the operational characteristics and assumptions used to develop the Existing Condition NEM were also used to generate the Future Condition NEM. Future operational characteristics including time of day, 0 departure profiles and stage lengths, runway utilization, standing takeoff operations, flight tracks, and flight track utilization are not expected to vary significantly from current operational characteristics by 2028. The U only operational characteristics that are expected to change are number of operations, air carrier/air taxi jet fleet mix, and back taxi operations. These assumptions were confirmed through consultation with airport staff and airport users. LO 5.2.1 Data Sources c� 5.2.1.1 FAA Terminal Area Forecast 00 The Terminal Area Forecast(TAF)is the official FAA forecast of aviation activity for U.S. airports. It contains active airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) including FAA-towered airports, Federal contract-towered airports, non-federal towered airports, and non-towered airports. Forecasts are prepared for major users of the National Airspace System including air carrier, air taxi/commuter, general Page 72 Packet Pg. 3061 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION aviation, and military. The forecasts are prepared to meet the budget and planning needs of the FAA and provide information for use by state and local authorities, the aviation industry, and the public. Published annually, the TAF remains constant until its next publication, with the only exceptions being significant traffic shifts by major airlines or a significant data error. 0 The TAF assumes a demand driven forecast for aviation services based upon local and national economic U) conditions as well as conditions within the aviation industry. In FFY 2020 there was a major decrease in 06 passenger enplanements and commercial operations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Total U) enplanements reported at FAA-towered airports and Federal contract-towered airports decreased 44.4 percent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Total operations at these airports decreased 16.7 percent, commercial operations decreased 26.5 percent, and non-commercial operations decreased 9.1 percent based on OPSNET data. In FFY 2021 there was a modest recovery with these parameters increasing at above historical average growth rates. There is uncertainty associated with the forecasts because of the 0 uncertainty regarding the pandemic and its economic impacts. The development of the TAF begins with an update of the latest historical en Ianement, operation, andCL 0 p g p p pCL based aircraft statistics using information derived from several sources. FAA's National Flight Data Center provides general airport information such as the airport name, location, and location identifier. Airport operations and Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) radar-assisted operations data for airports with FAA and Federal contract air traffic control services are reported by FAA air traffic and Federal contract tower staff. U) Table 5.1 presents the TAF operations for 2028 used in this NEM Update. CL TABLE 5.1 0 FAA'S TERMINAL AREA FORECAST FOR EYW FOR 2028 ITINERANT LOCAL 00 N AIR COMMUTER/ GENERAL N CARRIER AIR TAXI AVIATION MILITARY CIVIL MILITARY TOTAL 2028 TAF 26,553 8,635 31,131 350 2,435 92 69,196 Source: FAA TAF, May 2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates U 5.2.1.2 EYW Landing Reports Key West International Airport tracks aircraft landings for passenger and cargo airlines for the purpose of collecting landing fees and statistical data. The airlines submit monthly reports to the airport that detail the LO number of each aircraft type that landed at EYW during the month. Landing fees are collected from: Delta g Airlines, American Airlines (including Envoy Air Inc.), Allegiant Air, United Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Silver Airways, Skyway(formerly known as Ameriflight), and Mountain Air Cargo. 00 Table 5.2 summarizes the EYW Landing Reports for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. E c� Page 73 Packet Pg. 3062 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF EYW LANDING REPORTS NUMBER OF OPS PERCENT OF OPS AIRCRAFT TYPE AIRLINE BY AIRLINE BY AIRLINE 0 BY AC TYPE BY AC TYPE Envoy Air(aka AAL) 3470 73% U) 06 EMB175 DeltaAirlines 830 17% U) United Airlines 459 10% Envoy Air(aka AAL) 1637 51% A319 Delta Airlines 1492 46% AllegiantAir 112 3% W 0 ATR42(DHC8) Silver Airways 1480 100% CL CL EMB170 United Airlines 1267 100% CNA208 Mountain Air Cargo 453 100% W SW3/SW4(DHC6) AmerifI ight/Skyway 439 100% CL X EMB190 JetBlue Airways 415 100% 2 0 SF340 Silver Airways 69 100% 00 c14 cN EMB145 Envoy Air(aka AAL) 46 100% ATR76(DHC830) SilverAirways 22 100% Source: EYW Landing Reports, October 2020—September 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates U 5.2.2 Future Condition Fleet Mix The fleet mix for the Future Condition was developed from the Existing Condition fleet mix shown in LO Table 4.2, EYW Landing Reports for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021, shown in a 0 Table 5. , and information provided by airport staff regarding anticipated changes to aircraft types used by Delta Airlines and JetBlue Airways. 00 5.2.2.1 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Jet Current air carrier/ air taxi jet (AC/AT JET) operators include Delta Airlines, American Airlines, American Eagle, Allegiant Air, United Express, and JetBlue Airways. It is not anticipated that any new air carrier/air taxi passenger or cargo airlines will initiate service to EYW using jet aircraft by 2028. However, prior to 2028, Delta Airlines plans to replace their A-319 aircraft with A220-100 aircraft at EYW, and JetBlue Airways Page 74 Packet Pg. 3063 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION plans to replace their EMB190 aircraft with A220-300 aircraft at EYW. (R. Strickland, personal communication, April 7, 2021. E. D'Leon, personal communication, September 24, 2021, March 1, 2022) In AEDT, the 737700 is the official substitution for the A220. 5.2.2.2 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Prop 0 Current air carrier/ air taxi prop (AC/AT PROP) operators include, but are not limited to, Silver Airways, U) Ameriflight/Skyway, and Mountain Air Cargo. It is not anticipated that any new air carrier/air taxi passenger 06 or cargo airlines will initiate service to EYW using prop aircraft by 2028. Additionally, it is anticipated that U) the current operators will continue to use the same aircraft through 2028. 5.2.2.3 General Aviation Jet General aviation jet (GA JET) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant turbojet aircraft. Common GA jet aircraft operations at EYW include Bombardier Challenger, 4- Cessna Citation, Dassault Falcon, Gulfstreams, and Learjets. No changes are anticipated. 0 76 5.2.2.4 General Aviation Prop General aviation prop (GA PROP) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant aircraft, including lightweight single-and multi-engine(piston), and turboprop aircraft. Common GA prop aircraft operations at EYW include Beech, Cessna, Cirrus, Mooney, Partenavia, and Piper. No >_ changes are anticipated. 5.2.2.5 Military 0 0. Military (MIL) aircraft operations consist of fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters that are operated by any armed service or the federal government. Military aircraft can be either combat or non-combat. Common 0 fixed-wing military aircraft operations at EYW include Beechcraft C-12 Huron, Boeing 737, Boeing P8 0 Poseidon, EADS CASA HC-144 Ocean Sentry, Cessna Citation UH35A, Lockheed-Martin C130 Hercules, 00 N and Northrop T-38 Falcon. Common military helicopter operations at EYW include Bell TH-57 Sea Ranger, N Eurocopter UH-72A Lakota, Hughes MH-6 Little Bird, Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk, Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk, and Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion. No changes are anticipated. 0 5.2.2.6 Helicopters Helicopter (HELO) aircraft operations consist of local government-, private- and corporate-owned based U and itinerant rotorcraft. Helicopters at EYW do not takeoff or land on the airport's runways, but rather from the nonmovement area of the Fixed Base Operator. Common helicopter aircraft operations at EYW include Aerospatiale, Eurocopter, Bell, Hughes, Robinson, and Sikorsky. No changes are anticipated. LO 5.2.3 Future Condition Number of Operations c� Forecast aircraft operations data were obtained from the FAA's APO Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) Summary Report issued in May 2021. Table 5.1 presents the TAF operations for 2028 used in this NEM 00 Update. c� Page 75 Packet Pg. 3064 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 5.2.4 Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations Using the number of operations shown for AC/AT Jets in Table 4.2, the percentage of operations by aircraft type was calculated. These percentages were then applied to the total number of air carrier operations shown in Table 5. . The results are shown in Table 5.3. 0 The EYW Landing Reports air carrier/air taxi operations were broken down by airline and type of aircraft U) as shown in Table 5. . Envoy Air (aka American Airlines), Delta Airlines, and Allegiant Air operated A319 06 aircraft between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Delta Airlines conducted 46 percent of all U) A319 operations during that period. Since Delta plans to replace their A319 aircraft with A220 aircraft, 46 percent of the A319 operations in Table 5.3 were converted to A220 operations.JetBlue Airways conducted 100 percent of all EMB190 operations during that period. Since JetBlue plans to replace their EMB190 aircraft with A220 aircraft, all EMB190 operations were converted to A220 operations. The results are shown in Table 5.4. 0 76 TABLE 5.3 y INTERIM AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS CL AIRCRAFT CRJ9- CL TYPE EMB175 A319 A220 EMB170 EMB190 737700 EMB145 ER TOTAL %OF OPS 44.78% 33.58% 0% 15.77% 4.25% 1.10% 0.48% 0.03% 100% #OF OPS 11,891 8,917 0 4,188 1,129 293 126 8 26,553 Sources: OPSNET, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022, FAA TAF, May 2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates U) 0 0. TABLE 5.4 FINAL AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS 0) EMB175 A319 A220 EMB170 EMB190 737700 EMB145 CRJ9-ER TOTAL o 11,89100 4,812 5,234 4,188 0 293 126 8 26,553 cN Sources: OPSNET, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022, FAA TAF, May 2021 CL14 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Table 5.5 is the resulting fleet mix and number of flight operations by AEDT aircraft type for the Future Condition. 0 U LO 00 c� c� Page 76 Packet Pg. 3065 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.5 FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS AEDT AC/AT AC/AT GENERALAVIATION MILITARY GRAND AIRCRAFT GA GA GA MIL JET PROP MIL TOTAL 0 TYPE JET PROP HELD HELD EMB175 11,891 11,891 U) A319-131 4,812 4,812 06 73700(A220) 5,234 5,234 U) EMB170 4,188 4,188 EMB190 0 0 737700 293 293 EMB145 126 126 CRJ9-ER 8 8 DHC8 4,056 1 2 4,059 - DHC6 2,380 879 40 3,300 CNA208 1,701 1,178 2,879 0 CL SD330 264 264 CL SF340 186 35 220 DHC830 49 10 59 LEAR35 1 1,346 1 1,347 >- CNA510 1,241 1,241 CNA500 896 896 CNA560XL 865 865 U) 0 CL CNA680 829 829 CL600 696 696 c5 CNA560U 551 551 0 CNA55B 475 475 00 FAL900EX 475 475 CN CN CNA750 409 409 CNA560E 393 393 GV 267 2 269 0 GIV 241 241 _ IA1125 187 187 0 MU3001 173 173 f) ECLIPSE500 156 156 C525C 122 122 CIT3 97 97 8 CNA525C 96 96 Lo a BD-700-1A10 73 73 2 GIIB 10 10 LEAR25 200 2 E u Page 77 Packet Pg. 3066 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.5 (CONTINUED) FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS AEDT GENERAL AVIATION MILITARY AIRCRAFT AC/AT AC/AT GA GA GA MIL GRAND JET PROP MIL TOTAL 0 TYPE JET PROP HELD HELD GASEPV 7,544 4 7,549 CNA182 6,329 6,329 U) 06 BEC58P 2,444 2,444 U) PA30 11178 1,178 CNA441 295 295 DHC-2FLT 225 225 CNA206 125 125 PA42 106 106 GASEPF 103 103 0 D0328 25 25 NONE 24 24 > 0 DC3 4 1 5 CL CL S76 1,667 1,667 R44 1,387 1,387 SA355F 176 176 B206 134 134 EC130 108 108 MD60ON 13 13 U) 0 B212 3 1 4 CL A109 3 3 0 B429 1 2 2 2 0 C130E 116 116 00 T-38A 70 70 CN F5E 27 27 CN C17 19 19 0 C560 13 13 B350 11 11 2 F15E20 7 7 F18AF 2 2 0 U KC135R 2 2 S70 56 56 S65 31 31 Grand Total 26,553 8,636 9,600 1 20,473 1 3,494 1 354 88 69,197 Sources: FAA TAF, 2021, EYW Landing Reports FFY'21. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates y 0 5.2.5 Time of Day 00 The time of day that aircraft operations occur is a very important factor in the calculation of cumulative noise exposure. The DNL treats nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m.) noise differently from daytime (7:00 a.m. to c� 9:59 p.m.) noise. In the calculation of DNL, each operation at night is multiplied by 10, which effectively adds 10 dB to the A-weighted levels of each nighttime operation. This weighting factor is applied to account Page 78 Packet Pg. 3067 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION for people's greater sensitivity to nighttime noise. In addition, events during the night are often more intrusive because the ambient sound levels during this time are usually lower than daytime ambient sound levels. It has been assumed that the daytime vs. nighttime distribution for the Future Condition will be the same as it was for the Existing Condition and is shown in Table 5.6. o TABLE 5.6 DAYTIME VS. NIGHTTIME DISTRIBUTION U) 06 AIRCRAFT DEPARTURES ARRIVALS U) CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME NIGHTTIME AC/AT JET 96% 4% 89% 11% AC/AT PROP 97% 3% 98% 2% GA JET 96% 4% 97% 3% 4- 0 GA PROP 95% 5% 97% 3% 76 GA HELO 68% 32% 81% 19% MIL 98% 2% 93% 7% MIL HELO 88% 12% 57% 43% OVERALL 95% 5% 93% 7% W Source: FlightRadar24, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 0 0. 5.2.6 Departure Profiles and Stage Lengths 0 It has been determined that standard profiles will be used to model all aircraft operations for the Future 2 0 Condition, as was done for the Existing Condition. 00 It has been assumed that the stage length distribution for the Future Condition will be the same as it was Q for the Existing Condition and is shown in Table 5.7. 0 0 U LO 00 c� c� Page 79 Packet Pg. 3068 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.7 STAGE LENGTH DISTRIBUTION AIRCRAFT STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE CATEGORY LENGTH 1 LENGTH 2 LENGTH 3 LENGTH 4 LENGTH 5 0 AC/AT JET 15.6% 59.2% 25.1% 0% 0% AC/AT PROP 89.9% 9.2% 0.8% 0% 0% U) 06 GA 95.5% 4.4% 0.1% 0% 0% us GA JET 51.7% 33.2% 13.6% 1.5% 0.1% MIL 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 0% 0% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 4- 5.2.7 Runway Utilization o 76 It has been assumed that the runway utilization for the Future Condition will be the same as it was for the 0 CL Existing Condition. The runway utilization for departures is shown in Table 5.8 and for arrivals in Table 5. . TABLE 5.8 RUNWAY UTILIZATION - DEPARTURES AIRCRAFT RUNWAY 09 RUNWAY 27 CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME NIGHTTIME U) 0 AC/AT JET 88.7% 81.8% 11.3% 18.2% 0. AC/AT PROP 87.2% 81.8% 12.8% 18.2% 2 GA PROP 88.1% 87.2% 11.9% 12.8% 0 00 GA JET 88.9% 94.1% 11.1% 5.9% cN cN MIL 100% 0% 0% 100% OVERALL 88.4% 84.8% 11.6% 15.2% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. o Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 0 U LL LO 00 c� c� Page 80 Packet Pg. 3069 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.9 RUNWAY UTILIZATION -ARRIVALS AIRCRAFT RUNWAY 09 RUNWAY 27 CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME NIGHTTIME 0 AC/AT JET 85.2% 84.9% 14.8% 15.1% U) AC/AT PROP 87.1% 93.3% 12.9% 6.7% 06 U) GA PROP 87.0% 82.4% 13.0% 17.6% GA JET 85.1% 82.4% 14.9% 17.6% , MIL 100% 100% 0% 0% OVERALL 85.9% 84.8% 14.1% 15.2% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 0 5.2.8 Back Taxi Operations CL CL By 2028, Taxiway B will be extended to the end of the available pavement on Runway 09. Therefore, , back taxi operations will not occur on Runway 09 as they did in the Existing Condition. All aircraft will depart from the end of the available pavement on Runway 09. 5.2.9 Standing Takeoff Operations It has been assumed that standing takeoff operations for the Future Condition will be the same percentage CL by aircraft type as for the Existing Condition and are shown in Table 5.10. 0 TABLE 5.10 U STANDING TAKEOFF OPERATIONS 00 AEDT %OF RUNWAY ENGINE ANNUAL AVERAGE Q USE HEADING POWER DURATION DAILY AIRCRAFT TOTAL OPS 09/27 SETTING (SECONDS) OPS OPS 737700 68% 88%/12% 90°/270° 20,400 lbs. 15.0 1,879 5.1 A319-131 80% 88%/12% 90°/270° 18,700 lbs. 15.0 1,925 5.27 0 U CNA208 68% 88%/12% 90°/270° 1,955 lbs. 15.0 979 2.68 CRJ 100% 88%/12% 90°/270° 11,496 lbs. 15.0 4 0.01 DHC6 68% 88%/12% 90°/270° 1,700 lbs. 15.0 660 1.81 LO DHC8 40% 88%/12% 90°/270° 4,038 lbs. 15.0 812 2.22 c� EMB145 68% 88%/12% 90°/270° 6,375 lbs. 15.0 43 0.12 EMB170 45% 88%/12% 90°/270° 11,730 lbs. 15.0 943 2.58 00 EMB175 80% 88%/12% 90°/270° 11,730 lbs. 15.0 4,757 13.06 TOTAL 12,002 32.85 Sources: Field Observation, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022; AEDT, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Page 81 Packet Pg. 3070 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 5.2.10 Low Approach, Touch-and-Go, and Go-Around Operations Some general aviation and military aircraft perform a maneuver known as a touch-and-go (T&G) at EYW, primarily for pilot training. During a touch-and-go, the pilot makes an approach to landing, configures the 0 plane to land, and briefly touches down on the runway. Rather than coming to a stop and taxiing off the ° runway as a pilot would with a normal landing, once the wheels touch down, the pilot continues down the U) runway, reconfigures the plane for takeoff and executes an immediate takeoff without ever coming to a 06 stop. Table 5.11 shows the details of the T&G operations at the airport modeled for the Future Condition U) NEM. Approximately 6 average daily T&G operations were modeled TABLE 5.11 TOUCH-AND-GO OPERATIONS AEDT AIRCRAFT ANNUAL OPS AVERAGE DAILY OPS 4- 0 BEC58P 761 2.08 76 CNA182 739 2.02 GASPEV 739 2.02 C130E 83 0.23 TOTAL 2,452 6.35 Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates U) 0 CL Military aircraft occasionally conduct low approaches to the runway at EYW, without touching down at the airport. These are often training flights to practice landing approach to just above the runway. The military 2 made the decision decades ago that it is safer to not perform touch and go landings in high performance 0 jet aircraft, because every landing decreases the useful life of the tires, wheels and brakes, and actual 00 N touch and go landings introduce risks to the flight operation, including running off the end of the runway Q before getting airborne again. For this analysis, low approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). 0 Aircraft occasionally must perform a go-around or missed approach at EYW. Generally, if a pilot determines by the time the aircraft is at the decision height (for a precision approach) or missed approach point (for a 0 non-precision approach), that the runway or its environment is not in sight, or that a safe landing cannot be U accomplished for any reason, the landing approach must be discontinued (a "go-around") and the missed approach procedure must be immediately initiated. It is also common for pilots to practice a missed approach as part of initial or recurrent instrument flight training. For this analysis, go-grounds and missed LO approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). c� 5.2.11 Flight Tracks and Flight Track Utilization 00 It has been assumed that flight tracks and flight track utilization for the Future Condition will be the same as they were for the Existing Condition. Figures 4.1 through 4.10 illustrate the FR24 flight trajectories and AEDT modeled flight tracks when the airport is operating in east flow and west flow, respectively. Flight track utilization is depicted on each graphic. Page 82 Packet Pg. 3071 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Title 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Amendment No. 150-4, Section A150.103(b)(1), requires "A map of the airport and its environs at an adequately detailed scale (not less than 1 inch to 2,000 feet) indicating runway length, alignments, landing thresholds, takeoff start-of-roll points, airport boundary, and flight tracks out to at least 30,000 feet from the end of each runway." o Therefore, flight track maps at a scale of 1 inch to 2,000 feet are provided in Appendix G. 5.2.12 Summary of 2028 NEM Modeled Operations U) 06 A total of 69,196 annual aircraft flight operations were modeled to develop the 2028 Future Condition NEM. U) This equates to 189.6 average daily operations. Table 5.12 provides a breakdown of these operations by aircraft category. In addition to the 69,196 annual flight operations,12,002 annual aircraft run-up operations (i.e., standing takeoff operations)were modeled to develop the 2028 Future Condition NEM. This equates to 56 average daily run-up operations. 0 76 TABLE 5.12 0 SUMMARY OF 2028 FLIGHT OPERATIONS ANNUAL AVERAGE CATEGORY OPERATIONS DAILY OPERATIONS AC/AT JET 26,553 72.75 AC/AT PROP 8,636 23.66 ' GA PROP ITINERANT 18,038 49.42 X GA PROP LOCAL 2,435 6.67 GA JET 9,599 26.30 GA HELO 3,493 9.57 00 cN MIL ITINERANT 262 0.72 cN MIL LOCAL 92 0.25 MIL HELO 88 0.24 TOTAL 69,196 189.58 0 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. U Sources: FAA TAF 2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates LL LO c� 00 c� Page 83 Packet Pg. 3072 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 5.3 NOISE CONTOURS AND NONCOMPATIBLE LAND USES The information presented thus far represents the key data necessary to develop the input for the AEDT. From these data, the AEDT generates lines of equal sound levels centered upon the runway. These lines 0 of equal noise exposure are referred to as noise contours and are based on the DNL sound metric. ° The contours calculated for this study include the DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB contours. U) 06 Figure 5.1 presents the 2028 Future Condition noise contours superimposed over the existing land use U) base map and is referred to as the Future Condition NEM for Part 150 purposes. A large-scale version of the NEM is included in Appendix G. The base map provides community and airport geographic reference data such as runway configuration, roads, streets, and bodies of water. The surrounding land uses, and the location of noise-sensitive facilities were identified from aerial photography, online database research, and cross-referenced against the current City of Key West land use and zoning maps. This figure assists 4- in understanding the geographic relationship of the airport to the community and to the noise contours 0 generated by the airport's forecast aircraft activity. Figure 5.1 illustrates current compatible and noncompatible land uses surrounding EYW that are found within the DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB noise contours. Noncompatible land uses include single-family, multi- family, and transient lodging residential uses, as well as places of worship and community facilities >_ (institutional land uses) and are indicated by a crosshatch pattern. Portions of Key West by the Sea Condominiums, Ocean Walk Apartments, and Las Salinas Condominiums are within the DNL 65 dB and greater contour. Places of worship and community facilities (institutional land uses)within the DNL 65 dB 0. contour include Grace Lutheran Church and School, Catholic Charities St. Bede's Village, Peace Covenant Presbyterian Church, and Key West High School. Transient lodging facilities within the DNL 65 dB contour 0 include the Hyatt Residence Club Key West, Windward Pointe, and Hampton Inn Key West. Single- and 0 multi-family land uses within the DNL 65 dB contour that are shown as compatible, which would normally c00 0 be considered noncompatible, have been rendered compatible through participation in the Noise Insulation N Program (NIP) (see Appendix A, Section A.6). In addition to residential and institutional uses, Figure 5.1 also indicates parks and recreational properties 0 surrounding EYW that are found within the various noise contours within the Future Condition NEM. These include Riggs Wildlife Refuge/Bridle Path, Little Hamaca City Park, 11th Street Public Boat Ramp, portions U of Fran Ford White-crowned Pigeon Preserve, Smathers Beach, and Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. g Y g There are no National Register properties located within the noise contours. Table 5. 3 summarizes the acreage, by land use category, located within the DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB LO contours. Table 5. 4 provides the number of housing units and population within the DNL 65-, 70-, and g 75-dB contours. Single-family housing units that were split by a contour were counted in the higher-level contour. For multi-family residential and transient lodging facilities, the number of housing units was 00 distributed amongst the various contours based on the proportion of the parcel's acreage that fell within each contour. The number of housing units was rounded to the nearest whole number. To quantify the single-family and multi-family population within the 2028 DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB noise contours, U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year Estimates population data were utilized. Condominiums and apartments were considered fully occupied as these are usually owner- Page 84 Packet Pg. 3073 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION occupied or long-term leases. The data for the City of Key West indicated an average household size of 2.25, which was multiplied by the number of housing units to calculate estimated population. Estimated population was rounded to the nearest whole number. To calculate transient lodging population, Key West Hotel Occupancy Tourism Statistics were obtained 0 from the Key West Travel Guide. The number of available transient lodging units was determined for the Hyatt Residence Club Key West, Windward Pointe, and Hampton Inn Key West. (A. Henriquez, personal U) 06 communication, April 14, 2022)The average occupancy rate of 84.175% (for 2019)was then multiplied by U) the number of units to calculate estimated population. Estimated population was rounded to the nearest whole number. Table 5. 4 identifies the number of housing units that have participated in the NIP. These residences are now considered compatible land uses. The distribution of population between mitigated and unmitigated is based upon the number of mitigated and unmitigated housing units.Additional details regarding homes that 0 have participated in the NIP are included in Appendix A, Section A.6. TABLE 5.13 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES -ACREAGE DNL 65 DNL 70 LAND USE TYPE (ACRES) TO 70 TO 75 DNL TOTAL OVER dBA dBA dBA DNL 65 dBA >_ Airport 66.4 74.9 88.3 229.6 Commercial/Office 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 Institutional 8.5 0.0 0.0 8.5 0 0. Open Space 2.1 1.5 0.0 3.6 Public/Semi-Public 78.5 18.6 6.5 103.6 c� Residential -Multi-Family 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.6 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.5 00 Ocean Walk Apartments 9.5 4.6 0.4 14.5 N Las Salinas Condominiums 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.9 N Residential -Single Family 19.7 7.7 0.3 27.7 Transient Lodging 11.8 1.0 0.0 12.8 Transportation/Utility/Right of Way 11.4 2.9 0.1 14.4 0 Vacant 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 Water 75.4 3.3 0.5 79.2 0 t3 Total Acreage 293.5 114.6 96.1 504.2 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates and HD Mapping, 2022 LO c� 00 c� Page 85 Packet Pg. 3074 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 5.14 FUTURE CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES— HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION DNL 65 DNL 70 DNL 75+ TOTAL OVER NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS TO 70 TO 75 dBA DNL 65 dBA dBA dBA o Unmitigated (i.e., Noncompatible) Residential —Single Family 45 5 0 50 U) Residential —Multi-Family 5 0 0 5 06 U) Key West by the Sea Condominiums 21 0 0 21 Ocean Walk Apartments 159 77 6 242 Las Salinas Condominiums 39 0 0 39 Transient Lodging 145 14 0 159 (Occupancy Rate 84.175%) Total Unmitigated Housing Units 414 96 6 516 w Mitigated' (i.e., Compatible) 0 Residential —Single Family 96 63 8 167 > Residential —Multi-Family 3 1 0 4 CL Key West by the Sea 183 0 0 183 CL Total Mitigated Housing Units 282 64 8 354 Total Housing Units 696 160 14 870 DNL 65 DNL 70 >_ POPULATION TO 70 TO 75 DNL 75+ TOTAL OVER dBA dBA dBA DNL 65 dBA Unmitigated i.e., Noncom atible Residential —Single Family 101 11 0 113 0. X Residential —Multi-Family 11 0 0 11 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 47 0 0 47 U Ocean Walk Apartments 357 173 14 544 0 00 Las Salinas Condominiums 89 0 0 89 N Transient Lodging N (Occupancy Rate 84.175%) 326 30 0 356 Total Unmitigated Population 931 214 14 1,159 >` Mitigated' i.e., Compatible) Residential —Single Family 216 142 18 376 Residential —Multi-Family 8 2 0 10 0 Key West by the Sea 412 0 0 412 Total Mitigated Population 636 144 18 798 Total Population 1 1,567 1 358 1 32 1 1,957 LL Notes: Population and housing units are mitigated through participation in the NIP. , Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, QuickFacts, 2021. a https://www.hyattresidenceclub.cornlresorts/hyatt-windward-points, 2022. E Alexis Averette Henriquez, Director of Sales, Hampton Inn Key West, 2022. Key West Hotel Occupancy Tourism Statistics, Key West Travel Guide, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates and HD Mapping, 2022 00 c� Page 86 Packet Pg. 3075 L.7.h DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION The total number of flight operations for the 2022 Existing Condition NEM was 64,128, for an average daily number of 175.69 operations. The forecast number of annual aircraft flight operations for the 2028 Future Condition NEM is 69,196, or 189.58 average daily operations. Figure 5.2 presents the 2028 Future Condition noise contours with the 2022 Existing Condition noise 0 contours superimposed; this figure is provided for comparison purposes. The area within the 2028 Future Condition NEM noise contours increased in size by 29.9 acres, or approximately 6.0 percent when U) 06 compared to the 2022 Existing Condition NEM noise contours. This increase in size can be attributed to U) the increase in aircraft operations from 2021 to 2028. The contours also shifted to the west, which can be attributed to the relocation of Taxiway B to the end of the pavement. As a result, all aircraft departing on Runway 09 begin their takeoff roll at the end of the pavement. The 2028 Future Condition NEM encompasses 30 more acres of noncompatible land when compared to the 2022 Existing Condition NEM. The total housing units and population within the DNL 65 dB noise contour increases by approximately 23 W 4- percent. 0 Figure 5.3 presents the 2028 Future Condition noise contours with the 2018 Future Condition noise contours (from the previous NEM Update)superimposed. This figure is provided for comparison purposes. U) 0 0. X 0 c2 0 00 N 0 t3 LO c� 00 c� Page 87 Packet Pg. 3076 �f �1 IIIIIIIIII �' 0 ll� uuuu O a) a� o a� 7 cu V O +_� m E (0 U) U 0 a C a L L U Z Z U) LL d L.L Z Q �, 46 �11 ��fl ill � � O mop„ cu c c m p J lr U yJ l�6 w Y 1 i /r c LL = cu (B LL au)� nLU 0 W N(B U E C J (B C O N O Lp Lp � +' 2 o Q� (n +cu P c c c c � _ a) a) a) a) N �; '� = m U E M�A m m iM:A ��e a �/Ir'lNdI'llV; O O 1 M J C ooi O J 7 c0 O J J J /� j a �1gth/i W ja d "i 0 0 0 0 E fA fA •C Ln O Ln O y, 5 Q Q ii/ C 0 � � � r O O IIII uui i �I � a itli9�uIIlPilllti��l i � IIII i i uuuuuuu��llll h / I t I .. ...'a ^% aA', � l � i;gtVq r� / of m`v.r / r %r c , 1� �^�tiw IIIIIIIIIIIII'I�IIIIIIIIjP�jlll,P�,P�,P�,P�,II� i a 3 r 1, c o r r AlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIf fA liU ,k;::. �. t><' nq. n, ,,� ~W � � Jl ' ccu a� p°p i � a�i � CU o 0 r f ouuuum uuuuuuuiuuuuuuu �� .dV N E co 0 U 00 0 O a) O a) U (0 L U 2 2 13� U) lid IL T- (3) Q U I ( � a OU rncu CD J N a + rumr 'I -a ° E c cu � = >3 c U — � = U Ld N .— I I I 0 O Jcu 0 C C C U '� E cu U E I f Q N N N N C O U >_ Ir r f' L L � E o O O ° o " C _O wr, o1 �h U o U .� V) CD � U � - o mw� I� �f �4 4 Ill� Lp 0 .0 O _ _ J X 0 I to5k LL w Z Z a -a - � ° cn 1g N/ � ' r No No OLr) OLr) O O N cu O I W //nµ "'i I N (O N (O U a All '/� �; j / +d �rlil y.,,. E� /� //ii��/ I) C C IIII ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII In /� i ..../ / /, ✓/, .� / G% so Ad „.... ut AO k em llllluu f//�l1 E }, 1-1 a) O o o � o aa)i o aa)i 0 o � o a� Q U z z � u) LL a LL z Q c) lip i4mif, c o p '� �� N EI f / � m w / / „ T c co a wU J a _ co — cn c c O Q z n > a) co ° E LL Z co (0 a) LL .� � +� 0 U X / « uj f CU a) a) a) O fjj +' N iD//1/a!i�' j�/ �/I j � c_ � -0 L � � � E C O O U O O L L (3) co E LL CU hr O O O z) NLL YE y o LL U LL U Co (n ) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII„�, �..., �II I ��I O ipI/ G'��I �a C fA 0 fA "O v75- Z a) UJ d J a) a) a) .L Z Z Q 7 L a'' CU u: O Lo O Lo O O N C O A, -� hii r�i . b fJ A, CL ly f. �i) IIII� fir, el kk If l �� ,,,✓/Jii% "„",,, r ,� ,, is �,� � � � i%�,,,�„ � ..� � /// .. �!'' r,..�. A�,�, '/i ��t� //. r /y.•-. j �i; ��,�;,};'i' it�� ;�l ��/ 'I�///G /rt% 4'�,,i;;�ln / Isb C°Y, "//F / 41 � ryas DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 6 CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 6.1 INTRODUCTION 0 Title 14 CFR part 150 §150.21(b) requires that each Noise Exposure Map (NEM) must be developed and prepared in consultation with FAA regional officials, the officials of the state and of any public agencies and 6 planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour U) depicted on the NEM, and other federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map.This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport, including air carriers and other aircraft operators. Monroe County, the owner and operator of EYW, certifies that it has afforded interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the 0 revised NEMs and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Documentation describing the consultation accomplished during the development of the NEMs, and the opportunities afforded the public to review and comment, are included in this section and associated appendices. Copies of all written comments received during consultation are also included. 6.2 IDENTIFICATION OF CONSULTED PARTIES As described above, title 14 CFR part 150 §150.21(b) specifies the parties that must be consulted during development of the NEMs.Accordingly,the following parties were contacted and requested to provide input as appropriate: 0 • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 2 o Orlando Airports District Office (ORL ADO) o Southern Region Office of Airports, Planning & Programming Branch (ASO 610) o Air Traffic Organization, Eastern Service Center (ATO) • Naval Air Station Key West • Florida Department of Transportation 0 o FDOT Aviation Office U o District 6 Aviation Coordinator • Florida State Clearinghouse, Office of Intergovernmental Programs, Department of c� Environmental Protection • State Historic Preservation Officer, Bureau of Historic Preservation • Bureau of Public Land Administration, Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands c� Page 91 Packet Pg. 3080 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION • City of Key West o City Manager o Planning Department • Monroe County Administrator • South Florida Regional Planning Council • Key West Art and Historical Society • Monroe County School District Superintendent 06 U) • Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Land Authority • EYW Airport Traffic Control Tower Manager • Signature Flight • Key West Seaplane Adventures • Seaplanes in Key West 0 • Silver Airways 0 • American Airlines • United Airlines • Delta Airlines • Federal Express • Mountain Air Cargo • Ameriflight • Air Adventures 0 • Allegiant Air • Jet Blue Airways Corporation A summary of consultation and copies of notable correspondence with these parties are included in Appendix C. 6.3 MONROE COUNTY AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE U) a Monroe County established the Ad Hoc Committee on Noise on May 16, 1995, by board motion. The U members of the Ad Hoc Committee are appointed by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)and represent the community and the aviation industry. Four members and one alternate represent airport neighbors, and four members and one alternate represent airport users. The members serve for the duration of the committee. The committee chairperson is the BOCC representative from District 1, which includes the eastern portion of Key West, Stock Island, and Raccoon Key (aka Key Haven). Staff representatives, including the Assistant Director of Airports and the Airport Noise Program Coordinator, attend meetings, provide information, and answer questions. The members of the Ad Hoc Committee c� changed somewhat over the course of the NEM Update. The current members of the Ad Hoc Committee are shown in Table 6.1. Page 92 Packet Pg. 3081 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 6.1 MEMBERS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE NAME REPRESENTING Commissioner Craig Cates, Chair Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Marlene Durazo The Community 0 Alfred "Sonny" Knowles Aviation Industry 06 Peter Horton The Community U) Nikali Pontecorvo Aviation Industry Dr. William"Sandy" Quillen The Community Dr. Julie Ann Floyd Aviation Industry Nathaniel Harris The Community 0 Andrea Haynes Aviation Industry Norma Faraldo Community Alternate James Seadler Aviation Industry Alternate Source: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, 2022 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Key West is a small, densely populated island (approximately 2 x 4 miles). All areas of Key West are affected by noise, including civilian and military aircraft, motor scooters, wild free-range roosters and 0 chickens, and parties. The members of the Ad Hoc Committee, including Airport Neighbors, Airport Users, and the Monroe County BOCC representative, reside in Key West. Certain members live in areas more 2 directly affected by aircraft noise, such as Key West by the Sea, Las Salinas, Old Town, New Town, etc. However, the Committee has a collective and purposeful mission to not only represent the views of their immediate neighbors and/or aviation entity, but offer insights and comments related to noise issues affecting all Key West neighborhoods and aeronautical users. The Ad Hoc Committee generally meets four times each year. During the NEM Update, the Committee met on the following dates to discuss issues related to the NEM Update: 0 U • October 6, 2020 • December 1, 2020 • March 2, 2021 • June 1, 2021 , • October 5, 2021 • December 7, 2021 E c� • March 1, 2022 • June 7, 2022 • October 4, 2022 Page 93 Packet Pg. 3082 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Meetings started at 2:00 pm and were held at the Harvey Government Center, 1200 Truman Avenue, upstairs in the Commission Chambers and via a virtual meeting connection (https:Hmcbocc.zoom.us/). It is the view of the Committee that this time of day allows the best level of citizen involvement due to the unique demographics of the local population and the availability of the full spectrum of aeronautical users. The Committee's view is that the public at large is comprised of many retired persons and persons who earn their living in the leisure business industries including restaurants and hotels whose availability to attend public meetings is better suited to afternoon rather than evening hours. 06 The meetings listed above were advertised in The Key West Citizen as well as keysnews.com, and U) documentation is included in Appendix D. Agenda packages are distributed via email in advance of each meeting to all committee members as well as approximately 40 interested parties. Minutes of each meeting were prepared and approved by the committee. All meetings were open to the public. The meeting schedule, agenda packages, and meeting minutes are posted on the airport's website at httpse//eywecom/noise-concerns. The website provides contact information for the Airport Noise Program 4- Coordinator, as well as the phone number for the Key West International Airport Noise Hotline and the number to call for military aircraft noise complaints. CL The Ad Hoc Committee played an important role during the NEM update. Each of the members represented CL one or more constituent interests: neighborhood residents, public agencies, and aviation users. The committee members brought together the study team and the people they represented. The study team benefited from the unique viewpoints and had access to the people and resources each committee member represented. In addition, the study team needed a forum in which to present information, findings, ideas, and recommendations during the study. The committee members informed their constituents about the study as it progressed and brought into the committee the views of others. The study team needed their 0 work scrutinized closely for accuracy, completeness of detail, clarity of thought, and intellectual honesty. The committee brought suggestions to improve the study and documents. A summary of the public U comments received during the meetings is documented in the meeting minutes. Documentation of these meetings is contained in Appendix D. 6.4 DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION A Notice of Availability of the Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation (the Draft NEM document)was published in The Key West Citizen as well as keysnews.com during the week of September U) 17, 2022. The Notice was also placed on the airport's website at https:Heyw.com/public-notices. The Draft t0 NEM document was made available electronically(in PDF format)for download on the airport's website at httpse//eyw.com/public-notices.All interested parties that are included on the Ad Hoc Committee and study email distribution lists were notified via email of the availability of the Draft NEM document. The Draft NEM document was available for public review at the Key West Public Library, EYW Administrative Office, and the office of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates. A printed copy of the Draft NEM document and a limited number of flash drives containing the Draft NEM document were available at each location. The comment period started on September 19, 2021, and ended on October 20, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. The Draft NEM document E was available throughout the comment period and will remain available on the airport's website at httpse//eywecom/public-notices. Page 94 Packet Pg. 3083 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION A presentation on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation was made during the regular meeting of Monroe County's Ad Hoc Committee on Noise on October 4, 2022. The public was invited and encouraged to attend. There was an opportunity to ask questions, receive answers in real-time, and provide written comments. A copy of the meeting agenda, presentation, meeting minutes, Notice of Availability and Public Meeting, and proof of publication are included in Appendix D, Section D.10. 6.5 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The Ad Hoc Committee meetings served as the primary mechanism for receipt of public input for the NEM 6 Update. Issues were raised, comments and suggestions were made, and all were discussed during the Ad U) Hoc Committee meetings. All public comments received throughout the EYW NEM Update are included in Appendix E.All comments and questions received during the development of the NEMs were received during Ad Hoc Committee meetings. They are summarized in Appendix E, Section E.2. Comments received during the comment period on the Draft EYW NEM Update Report identified in Section 6.4 are included in Appendix E,Section 0 E.3. The most common themes identified in the public comments to date include the following: 0 • The consecutive 12-month period to be used for the existing condition noise contours • The source(s)of data used to determine the number of aircraft operations, aircraft types, day/night distribution, runway utilization, and flight tracks • The use of stage length to determine aircraft weight/departure profile since load factors at EYW are typically higher than average. • The use of a "hold-down" procedure for departures on Runway 09 • The use of back taxi procedure for departures on Runway 09 • The use of"standing takeoff' procedure • The size and shape of the updated noise contours c2 Appendix E contains a copy of all written material submitted by the public during the NEM Update, as required by part 150 §150.21(b). 6.6 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) oversees the management and operation of all civilian U) airports within the County, including EYW. It is comprised of five elected officials, each representing a a 0 different district.The BOCC meets monthly in Key Largo, Marathon,or Key West.The Consultant will attend L? the BOCC meeting in Key West on November 15, 2022, to present the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Noise to the BOCC. During this meeting the BOCC will be asked to vote to approve the g c� submission of the NEMs to the FAA. 6.7 AIRPORT OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATION ; The Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) for Key West International Airport, which will be submitted to the FAA c� in accordance with title 14 CFR part 150,were prepared with the best available information and are certified as true and complete to the best of the airport operator's knowledge and belief. Each map and related documentation were developed and prepared in accordance with Appendix A of 14 CFR part 150. Page 95 Packet Pg. 3084 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION The assumptions and activity levels used to develop the 2022 Existing Condition NEM are based on data from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021 (FFY 2021). Because the data used to develop the existing condition noise contours does not match the year that will be on the airport operator's planned NEM submittal letter to the FAA(2022), the airport operator must verify in writing that data in the documentation are representative of the existing condition as of the date of 0 submission. Data for the most recent 12-month period of operations at EYW were examined and support the airport operator's certification that the FFY 2021 data is representative of the year on the airport U) 06 operator's planned NEM submittal letter (2022). The analysis of recent data shows there has not been a U) substantial change in aircraft activity. The yearly day-night average sound level contours depicted on the 2022 NEM accurately represent the cumulative noise exposure resulting from the operation of EYW as of the airport operator's planned NEM submittal letter (2022). The assumptions and activity levels used to develop the Future Condition NEM are based on reasonable forecasts and other planning assumptions. The Future Condition NEM is based on data generated for a ,- timeframe at least five years in the future from the year of submission (2022). The Future Condition NEM developed for 2028 accurately represents the FAA's forecast for 2028.The noise contours representing the CL future condition are identified as the 2028 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map. CL The NEMs were prepared in consultation with state, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the NEMs. The consultation also included federal officials having local responsibility and regular aeronautical users of the airport. It is further certified that adequate opportunity has been and will be afforded interested persons to submit their views,data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the Noise Exposure Maps and the supporting documentation and forecasts. 0 A copy of the draft transmittal letter to the FAA and signed Airport Operator's Certification are included in c� Appendix F. .2 CL 6.8 FAA REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEMS Pursuant to § 150.21 (a), Monroe County(the airport operator)will submit to the FAA the specified number of copies of the noise exposure map with accompanying documentation which identifies each noncompatible land use in each area depicted on the map, as of the date of submission.The accompanying documentation will include (1) the noise exposure based on forecast aircraft operations at the airport for a U forecast period that is at least 5 years in the future, beginning after the date of submission (based on reasonable assumptions concerning future type and frequency of aircraft operations, number of nighttime operations, flight patterns, airport layout including any planned airport development, planned land use LO changes, and demographic changes in the surrounding areas); and (2) the nature and extent, if any, to which those forecast operations will affect the compatibility and land uses depicted on the map. Pursuant to § 150.21 (c), the FAA will acknowledge receipt of the noise exposure maps and descriptions E and will indicate whether they are in compliance with the applicable requirements. Following their determination that the NEMs submitted by EYW are in compliance with applicable requirements, the FAA will publish in the Federal Register a notice of compliance for each such noise exposure map and description, identifying the airport involved. Such notice will include information as to when and where the Page 96 Packet Pg. 3085 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION map and related documentation are available for public inspection. The Federal Register Notice will also be included in Appendix F. As described in §47506(b)(1) of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, a legal notice will be advertised in the local newspaper, The Key West Citizen and keysnews.com announcing the existence of the noise exposure maps. Pursuant to §47506(b), the legal notice will be published at least three times 0 in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which such property is located. The purpose of this notice is to provide constructive knowledge of the existence of the noise exposure maps. Copies of the U) 06 notice and the affidavit of publication will be included in Appendix F. U) 4- 0 0 CL CL 0 c2 U) a 0 U c� E c� Page 97 Packet Pg. 3086 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION LIST 0FREFERENCES 23U.S.C. § 138 (2019). 40 U.S.C. § 303 (2012). 54U.S.C. § 3U61U8 (2U14). . 0 Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, 14C.F.RL § 150 (1984). 0 06 Approval of noise compatibility program, Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 64 F.R. 27848 z (iQAA. May 21). � � Approval of noise compatibility program update. Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida, 80 F.R. 18491 (2015. April 8). CL CL florid5 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out equipment and use, 14 C.F.R. § 91.225 (2021). 91.225 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out equipment performance requirements, 14 1� � C.F.R. § 01.227 (20i0). ' � � Automatic Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast. (2021, October 14). In Wikipedia. Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of1Q70. Pub. L No. Q8-103. Q4Stat50 (108O). Poge08 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Bureau of Economic and Business Research. (2011, April). Florida population: Census summary 20f(\ University ofFlorida. Bureau of Economic and Business Research. (2020, April). Florida estimates of population 2020. University ofFlorida. Division of Historical Resources. (n.d.). Florida master site file historic site data sheet(No. M000797B). 0 Florida Department ofState. � m 06 FAA Reauthorization Act of201O. Pub. L No. 116-2S4. 132StoL3188 (201O). Facecchia, A. (2017, October 23). Why do military airplanes simulate a landing but take off immediately � when near the civilian airport? C)uons. W � Federal Aviation Administration. (1977, December 30). Airport-Land Use Compatibility Planning. (FAA CL CL Advisory Circular 150/5050-6) [Policy]. U.S. Department of Transportation. � Federal Aviation Administration. (1999, May 7). Record of approval 14 CFR Part 150 Noise compatibility program: Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida. 792Lpdf � � � Federal Aviation AdminietruUon (2015 March Record ' ' ' 1� � compatibility program:Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida. ' � � Federal Aviation Administration. (2017. June l). Operational data reporting requirements(FAA Order JO 721O.55F) [Po|icy]. U.S. Department ofTransportation. Poge00 L.7.j DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Federal Aviation Administration. (2019, April 16). Notice of proposed construction or alteration (No. FAA 7460-1). U.S. Department of Transportation. httpse//www.faa,gcv/forms/in ex.cfm/ao/document.information/ ocumentid/l86273 Federal Aviation Administration. (2019, February 26). Airport Improvement Program Handbook(FAA Order 5100.38D, Change 1) [Policy]. U.S. Department of Transportation. httcse//www.faa,gcv/airports/aic/aio handbook/ Federal Aviation Administration. (2020, February 16). Special use airspace (FAA Order JO 7400.10B). 0 U.S. Department of Transportation. 06 https-://www.faa,gov/documentLibrarv/media/0rder/Order 7400.10B Special Use Airspace - U) with Digital Signature Box 003}apdf Federal Aviation Administration. (2021a, August 12-September 9). SE-3 KEYWEST INTL (EYIM RNAV (GPS) RWY 9. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from 4- 0 httcse//aeronavafaa.gov/d-tcc/2109/00606r9®cd nameddest=(E ) 76 0 L- CL CL Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 b, March). Aviation Environmental Design Tool(AEDT): Supplemental manual, AEDT Standard Input File (ASIF). U.S. Department of Transportation. httcse//aedt.faa.gov/Documents/AEDTSupclemental AS FReference 3 .pdf Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 c, August 12-September 9). SE-3 KEY WEST INTL (EYW) RNAV (GPS) RWY 27. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from httcse//aeronavafaa.gov/ -tcc/2109/00606r27.cdf#nameddest=(E ) 0 Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 d, October 24). Operations Network(OPSNET):Air Traffic Activity System (A TADS) [Report]. U.S. Department of Transportation. httcse//aspm.faa.aov/oi3snet/sys/main.asp cs Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 e, August 12-September 9). SE-3. KEY WEST INTL (EYW) NDB-A. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from httcse//aeronavafaa.gov/d-tcc/2109/00606na.cdf#nameddest=(E ) Page100 Packet Pg. 3089 L.7.j DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Federal Aviation Administration. (2021f, December 8). Traffic Flow Management System Counts (TFMSC):Aviation Performance Metrics(ASPM) [Report]. U.S. Department of Transportation. https-.//aspm.faa.aov/tfms/sys/main.asp Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 g, September 14). FAA master record for Key West international airport. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://adip,faa.gov/axis/public/#/airportData/EYW 0 Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 h, September 9-October 7). SE-3 (FAA) KEY WEST INTL (EYW) Airport Diagram. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from U) 06 U) https://aeronay.faa.gov/d-tpp/2109/00606ad.pdf#nameddest=(EYW) Federal Aviation Administration. (2021 i, October 7). FAA VFR Miami sectional aeronautical chart. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://aeronay.faa. ov/visual/08-12-2021/PDFs/ iami.pdf - Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-a). Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast(ADS-B). U.S. CL CL Department of Transportation. ttps://vvvvvv amgov/nextgen/programs/a sb/ Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-a). National Plan of Integrated Airports Systems (NPIAS). U.S. Department of Transportation. https-://www.faa.aov/airr)orts/plannina capacity/nnias/ � c� Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-b). Glossary. U.S. Department of Transportation. httr)s://www.faa.aov/reaulations policies/oolicv guidance/noise/ ossary// 4- Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-c). The FAR Part 150 airport noise compatibility planning program: An overview. U.S. Department of Transportation. httr)s://www.faa.qov/sites/faa.qov/files/about/office org/headquarters offices/apl/I .B.pdf Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-d). Guidance on using the Aviation Environmental Design Tool c� (AEDT) to conduct environmental modeling for FAA actions subject to NEPA. U.S. Department of Transportation. httDs:Haedt.faa.gov/Documents/guidance aedt nepa.Ddf Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-e). Operations Network(OPSNET). U.S. Department of Transportation. https:Haspm.faa.gov/aspmhelp/index/Op rations Network (OPSNET).html Page101 Packet Pg. 3090 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-f). OPSNET manual. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.-g). OPSNET reports: Definitions of variables. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://asom.faa.qov/asomhelp/index/OPSNET Reports Definitions of Variables.htmi Fla. StaL § 183.3177. (2U21). 06 Fla. Stat. § 38O.06. (2021). Ra. Stat. §§ 333.01-333.1S. (2021). � CL CL Florida Department of Transportation. (2020). 2020 Airport airspace and land use guidebook. Janus Research. (1997). Site file form for Drivers License Office (No. 8MO270 1). Florida Department of State, Division of Resources. � Janus Research. (1998, April). A cultural resource assessment survey for North Roosevelt(SR5) and ~ South Roosevelt(SR A 1A) boulevard from Jose Marti streetlEisenhower drive to Bertha street in ' � � Monroe County, Florida (FyWSF Manuscript No. 5922). Florida Department ofTransportation. Janus Research. (2016, January). Cultural resources desktop analysis and reconnaissance of SR A IAIS Roosevelt boulevard from Bertha street to the east end ofSnva&hocn Beach /n the City ofKey West, Monroe County, Florida (FMSF Manuscript No. 22787). Florida Department ofState, Division of Historical Resources. Janus Research. (2020, June). Cultural resources assessment survey for the Key West International Airport improvements (SHPO/FOHR Project File No. 2020-1109). Monroe County, Florida. Pagei02 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Key West International Airport. (2019, September).Airport master plan update 2015-2035. Key West, Florida Code of Ordinances § i22-1048 (202i). Key West, Florida Code of Ordinances § i22-1438 et. seq. (2021). 0 06 Key West, Florida Comprehensive Plan § 1-1 (2020). Lee, C.. Thrasher, T.. Boekar. E.. Downs, R.. Gorahknv. S.. Hansen, A.. Hwang, S.. Koopmonn. J.. Lee, ~~ C, Ma|vvitc. A, Noel, G.. Reherman. C.. Shumvvay. yW. A.. Simon, M.. So|man. G. 8.. Tooa. Y.. mu 76 Wilson, A.. Zubrow. A.. DiPando. J.. yWa]aed. M.. ... Foley, R. (2021. March). Aviation Environmental Design 7oo/(AEDT): Technical manual(Version 3d). U.S. Deportment of �� Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. ' Lee, C_ Thrasher, T` Hwang, S.. Shumvvay. M, Zubnow. A.. Hansen, A.. Koopmann. J.. &So|man. G. (202i. K4aroh).Aviation Environmental Design Tool(4ED7): User manual(Version 3d). U.S. Department uf Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. � Linhundt. A. (n.d.). Blimp (Fat Albert) history. The Coconut Telegraph. Long, D. (n.d.). CPBs eyes in the sky: CBPs tethered aerostats keep watch for trouble from 10,000 feet. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. PageiO3 L.7.j DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Monroe County Historical Restoration and Preservation Commission. (1972). National register of historic places inventory—Nomination form for East Martello tower(No. 8MO211). Florida Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources. Monroe County, Florida Code of Ordinances § 130-75 (2021). https://librarv.municode.com/fl/monroe county/cedes/land development code?ncdel =CH130LA USDI ARTIIIPECOUS S130-75A D AD Monroe County, Florida Comprehensive Plan Technical Document Update § 6 (2011, May). 0 https://�n ww.m nnrcecounty- .aov/DccumentCenter/View/11720/ onroe-County-Comprehensive- 0 06 Plan®Technical-Document®Update® ay-2011?bidld= U) Monroe County, Florida Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan § 3.13 (2021). https://library,municode.com/fl/mon roe county/codes/comprehensive plan?node d=n1QGOOBP O 3.13 NCO 4- Monroe County, Florida Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan § 3.5 (2021). o https://library,municode.com/fl/mon roe county/codes/comprehensive plan?node d=n10OOOBP CL CL O 3.5POAVREFA National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (1966). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-80/pdf/STATUTE-80®Pg915mpdf U) c� National Weather Service (n.d.-a). Wind frequency plots for Key West international airport. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 4- September 20, 2021, from https://www. reathera ov/kev/wind frequency#SPEED o National Weather Service. (n.d.-b). Florida Keys climate data. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from httt)s://www.weather.00v/kev/climate#History Noise exposure map notice, Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 73 F.R. 53319 (2008, September 15). https://www.federairegister.gov/document,s/2008/09/15/E8-21185/noise- exposure-map-notice-key-west-international-airport-key-west-fl Page104 Packet Pg. 3093 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise exposure map notice; Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 78F.Fi7006i (2013. Deoember27). Noise exposure map notice; Receipt ofnoise compatibility program revision and request for review, Kay West International Airport, Key West, FL. 63F.R. G6O37 (1UQ8. December 3). 0 Noise exposure maps, 4QU.S.C. §475U3 (2U18). � m 06 elim z Pan American Consultants. (2012, August). Key West historic resources survey 2011, City of Key West � Planning Department, Key West, Monroe County, Florida (F��SF [�anunnrip� No. 1A627). ��onroe ` ' mu County Florida, City of Key West Planning Department. ~ Protection of Historic Propartieu, 38 C.F.R. § 800 (2000). CL CL \SK/parA800 � � Rayer. S.. &Wang, Y. (2021. June). Population projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin for Florida and its counties, 2025'2045, with estimates for 2020(Bulletin 190). University of Florida, Bureau nf Economic and Business Research. � Rayer S VVang Y Dub/ R � Rou|ubon-Doty S (2O2O December) Houaeho��/endaveny�e ' ` ' ` ' '' ' ' ' ' 1� � household size/nFlorida:April t2020(Jo|. 54. Bulletin 188). University nf Florida, Bureau of ' � Economic and Business Research. ReoeanchAd|antioa. (1008). Historical structure form for D.M. Soho0n, House (No. MOOi864). Florida Department ofState, Division of Historical Resources. Sofa, Efficient Use, and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace, 14 C.F.R. § 77 (2010). Pagei05 L.7.j DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Tethered Aerostat Radar System. (2021, September 12). In Wikipedia. h_t_tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethered Aerostat Radar System Touch-and-go landing. (2021, September 18). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch-and- g2_1anding Transportation Research Board. (2010). Enhancing airport land use compatibility: Vol. 1. Land use fundamentals and implementation resources(Report No. 27). National Academy of Sciences. 0 http://heber-ut.granicus.com/DocumentViewer..php?file=heber- ut d e5e5bc6ddfc8ebb6ed739251647330.Ddf. U) 06 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1993a). Historical structure form for Key West Battery Bravo Hawk 2 Missile Site (No. 8M03611). Florida Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1993b). Historical structure form for Key West East Martello Battery(No. 4- 0 8MO1877). Florida Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources. 0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1995).An architectural inventory Naval Air Station Key West, Florida CL (FMSF Manuscript No. 6771). Naval Air Station Key West, Florida. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002, July). U.S. summary: 2000. Census 2000 Profile. U.S. Department of Commerce. httpse//www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/2000/c2kprof00-us/c2kprof00- us, df 4T 0 U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 Census: Population and housing unit counts(Report No. CPH-2). U.S. 4- 0 Department of Commerce. httpse//www2.census.gov/library//publications/decennial/2010/cph- 2/cph-2-1,pdf U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2017 National population projections tables: Main series. U.S. Department of Commerce. httpse//www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/pop roi/2017-summary tab es. tml U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). QuickFacts: Key West city, Florida. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from httpse//ww .census®gov/auickfacts/fact/table/keywestcityflorida/HSD410219 HSD410219 Page106 Packet Pg. 3095 L.7.j DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION U.S. Department of Commerce. (1992a). 1990 census of population: General population characteristics Florida, Section 1 of2. h_t_t se//www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1990/cp®1/cp®1®11® l.pdf U.S. Department of Commerce. (1992b). 1990 Census of population: General population characteristics: United States. tt s://www2.census.aov/library/publications/decennial/1990/cp®1/cp®1®1.p f URS Corporation. (2000). Key West International Airport Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program, Noise Insulation Program, Policies and Procedures. Monroe County, Florida. 0 URS Corporation. (2004). Historic resources survey of Key West, Monroe County, Florida (FMSF 06 Manuscript No. 11157). City of Key West, Florida. U) URS Corporation. (2007a, January). Documentation package for Site 3MO1888 Former Meacham Field, Key West, Florida. Federal Aviation Administration. URS Corporation. (2007b, January). Resources group form for Meacham Field(former) (No. 8MO1888). 4- Florida Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources. 0 URS Corporation. (2007c, February). Key West International Airport Part 150 Study, 2005 Noise Contour CL CL Update. Monroe County, Florida. , URS Corporation. (2008). Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. c� URS Corporation. (2013). Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation for the Part 150 Study, 4T Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. 4- URS Corporation. (2015). Noise Compatibility Program for the Part 150 Study, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. URS Greiner. (1999). Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. c� Page107 Packet Pg. 3096 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX B AIRCRAFT NOISE B.1 AIRCRAFT NOISE Aircraft noise originates from the engines as well as the airframe or structure of aircraft. The engines are generally the most significant source of noise. While noise generated by propeller-driven aircraft can be o annoying,jet aircraft are commonly the source of disturbing noise at airports. Two basic types of jet aircraft are operated today equipped with turbofan or turbojet engines.Aircraft flying faster than the speed of sound generate an intense pressure wave called a sonic boom, in addition to the propulsion and airframe noise. 06 U) Turbofan engines produce thrust as reaction to the rate at which high-velocity gas is exhausted from nozzles. The engine core consists of a compressor, combustion chambers, a turbine and a front fan. The major sources of noise include the core engine fan streams, the compressor, turbine blades and exhaust nozzles. In comparison, turbojet aircraft do not have the front fan component. It has been found in several cases that the sound energy produced by a turbojet engine is greater than that of a turbofan engine with W 4- an equivalent thrust rating. o 76 The noise produced by jet aircraft flyovers is characterized by an increase in sound energy as the aircraft CL approaches, up to a maximum level. This sound level begins to lessen as the aircraft passes overhead CL and then decreases in a series of lesser peaks as the aircraft departs the area. Noise produced by propeller driven aircraft and helicopters emanates from the blades and rotors. There are two components of this noise, namely vortex and periodic. Vortex noise is generated by the formation and shedding of vortices in the airflow past the blade. Periodic noise is produced by the oscillating pressure _ field in the air that results from the passage of air past the blade. Blade slap is an additional source of noise o in helicopters. This is high-amplitude periodic noise and highly modulated vortex noise caused by fluctuating forces as one blade cuts through the tip vortices of another. B.2 AIRCRAFT NOISE TERMINOLOGY The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) uses a variety of noise metrics to assess potential airport noise CL impacts. Different noise metrics can be used to describe individual noise events (e.g., a single operation CL of an aircraft taking off overhead) or groups of events (e.g., the cumulative effect of numerous aircraft N operations, the collection of which creates a general noise environment or overall exposure level). Both types of descriptors are helpful in explaining how people tend to respond to a given noise condition. Descriptions of the metrics used in this NEM Update are provided in the following text. c� Decibel, dB — Sound is a complex physical phenomenon consisting of many minute vibrations traveling through a medium, such as air. The human ear senses these vibrations as sound pressure. Because of the vast range of sound pressure or intensity detectable by the human ear, sound pressure level (SPL) is represented on a logarithmic scale known as decibels (dB). A SPL of 0 dB is approximately the threshold of human hearing and is barely audible under extremely quiet (laboratory-type) listening conditions. A Page B-1 Packet Pg. 3097 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION person begins to feel a SPL of 120 dB inside the ear as discomfort, and pain begins at approximately 140 dB. Most environmental sounds have SPLs ranging from 30 to 100 dB. Because decibels are logarithmic, they cannot be added or subtracted directly like other(linear) numbers. For example, if two sound sources each produce 100 dB,when they are operated together they will produce 103 dB, not 200 dB. Four 100 dB sources operating together again double the sound energy, resulting in a total SPL of 106 dB, and so on. In addition, if one source is much louder than another, the two sources operating together will produce the same SPL as if the louder source were operating alone. For example, a 100 dB source plus an 80 dB source produces 100 dB when operating together. The louder source 0 masks the quieter one. Two useful rules to remember when comparing SPLs are: (1) most people perceive a 6 to 10 dB increase U) 06 in SPL between two noise events to be about a doubling of loudness, and (2) changes in SPL of less than U) about 3 dB between two events are not easily detected outside of a laboratory. A-Weighted Decibel, dBA — Frequency, or pitch, is a basic physical characteristic of sound and is expressed in units of cycles per second or hertz (Hz). The normal frequency range of hearing for most people extends from about 20 to 15,000 Hz. Because the human ear is more sensitive to middle and high frequencies (i.e., 1000 to 4000 Hz), a frequency weighting called "A" weighting is applied to the - measurement of sound. The internationally standardized"A"filter approximates the sensitivity of the human 76 ear and helps in assessing the perceived loudness of various sounds. For this Part 150 Study, all sound CL levels are A-weighted sound levels and the text typically omits the adjective "A-weighted". CL Figure 13.1 charts common indoor and outdoor sound levels. A quiet rural area at nighttime may be 30 dBA or lower, while the operator of a typical gas lawn mower may experience a level of 90 dBA. Similarly, the level in a library may be 30 dBA or lower, while the listener at a rock band concert may experience levels near 110 dBA. 0 Maximum A-Weighted Noise Level, LAmaX — Sound levels vary with time. For example, the sound increases as an aircraft approaches, then falls and blends into the ambient, or background, as the aircraft Pp 9 cs recedes into the distance. Because of this variation, it is often convenient to describe a particular noise "event" by its highest or maximum sound level (LAma.). It should be noted that LAmax describes only one dimension of an event; it provides no information on the cumulative noise exposure generated by a sound source. In fact, two events with identical LAmax levels may produce very different total noise exposures. CL One may be of very short duration, while the other may last much longer. CL N T_ c� Page B-2 Packet Pg. 3098 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION FIGURE B.1 COMMON OUTDOOR AND INDOOR SOUND LEVELS Tf r Outdoor Sound Levels llndovr Sound Levels Threshold of Pain Threshold of Pain Military,let Takeoff with Afterburner at 55 feet 06 of":IGI � r Rock Band Concert u; •mum � l Ambulance Siren at 10 feet ' Pile Driver at 50 feet u;fb Night Club with Live Music Gas Lawnmower at 3 feet 'r Sports'Boat at 100 feet �� W Diesel Truck at 50 feet / „� � 0 76 "r1 Concrete Mixer at 50 feet it Food Blender at 3 feet ° } f r L- Leaf Blower at 50 feet %,�� Noisy Restaurant C, Garbage Disposal at 3 feetCL Vacouum Cleaner at 10 feet Commercial f Urban Area,Daytime %/% Normal Conversation at 3 feet Urban Expressway at 300 feet % Active Office Environment Suburban Area,Daytime �pw Quiet Office Environment Dishwasher,Next Room Quiet Urban Area Nighttime Quiet Suburban Area, Nighttime Library Quiet Rural Area, Nighttime Quiet Bedroom,Nightime Concert Hall,Background X Leaves Rustling Quiet Wilderness Area, No find 1'1 i Recording Studio 'ial�yr� u,,��A�� J b, P, CL r CN Threshold of Human Wearing Threshold of Human Rearing r E r �o��000000000i0000i00000000000000i0000i0000000000000000000i0000000000000000000i0000000000000000000i0000i00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000i0000000000000000000i0000i0000000000000000000i0000000000000000000i0000000000000000000i0000i0000000i i Source: URS Corp, 2008. Page B-3 Packet Pg. 3099 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Sound Exposure Level, SEL—The most common measure of noise exposure for a single aircraft flyover event is the SEL. SEL is a summation of the A-weighted sound energy at a particular location over the true duration of a noise event, normalized to a fictional duration of one second. The true noise event duration is defined as the amount of time the noise event exceeds a specified level (that is at least 10 dB below the maximum value measured during the noise event). For noise events lasting more than one second, SEL does not directly represent the sound level heard at any given time, but rather provides a measure of the net impact of the entire acoustic event. The normalization to the fictional duration of one second enables the comparison of noise events with o differing true duration and/or maximum level. Because the SEL is normalized to one second, it will almost always be larger in magnitude than the LAmax for the event. In fact,for most aircraft events,the SEL is about U) 7 to 12 dB higher than the Lamar. Additionally, since it is a cumulative measure, a higher SEL can result 06 from either a louder or longer event, or a combination thereof. Since SEL combines an event's overall sound level along with its duration, SEL provides a comprehensive way to describe noise events for use in modeling and comparing noise environments. Computer noise models, such as the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) that was used for this study, base their computations on these SELs. 4- 0 Figure 13.2 shows an event's "time history," or the variation of sound level with time. For typical sound 76 events experienced by a stationary listener, like a person experiencing an aircraft flyover, the sound level o CL rises as the source(or aircraft)approaches the listener, peaks and then diminishes as the aircraft flies away CL from the listener. The area under the time history curve represents the overall sound energy of the noise event. The LAma.for the event shown in Figure 13.2 was 93.5 dBA. Compressing the event's total sound energy into one second yields an SEL of 102.7 dBA. Equivalent Sound Level, Led— Equivalent sound level (Leq) is a measure of the noise exposure resulting A 0 from the accumulation of A-weighted sound levels over a particular period of interest (e.g., an hour, an 8- hour school day, nighttime, or a full 24-hour day). However, because the length of the period can be different depending on the period of interest, the applicable period should always be identified or clearly understood when discussing this metric. Such durations are often identified through a subscript. For example, for an 8 hour or 24 hour day, Leq(s)or Leq(24) is used, respectively. Conceptually, Leq may be thought of as a constant sound level over the period of interest that contains as CL much sound energy as the actual time-varying sound level with its normal"peaks"and"dips". In the context CL of noise from typical aircraft flight events, and as noted earlier for SEL, Leq does not represent the sound N level heard at any particular time, but rather represents the total sound exposure for the period of interest. Also, it should be noted that the "average" sound level suggested by Leq is not an arithmetic value, but a logarithmic, or"energy-averaged,"sound level. Thus, loud events tend to dominate the noise environment c� described by the Leq metric. Page B-4 Packet Pg. 3100 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION FIGURE 13.2 COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM SOUND LEVEL (LMAx) AND SOUND EXPOSURE LEVEL (SEL) SEL=102.7 dBA - 100 N —R J a Lmax=93.5 dBA 2 90 C E 41 �I�/iiii.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii 7 �+ G7 V i/iiii. f8! 2.0iii/iiii. !iii% iiiiiiii iiiiiiiii /ice �� ii / 1 ii�� 306 80 70 W 4- 0 10 20 30 0 Time(seconds) 0 Source: URS Corporation,2008. Day-Niaht Averaae Sound Level. DNL — Time-average sound levels are measurements of sound averaged over a specified length of time. These levels provide a measure of the average sound energy during the measurement period. For the evaluation of community noise effects, and particularly aircraft T 0 noise effects, the Day-Night Average Sound Level (abbreviated DNL) is used. DNL logarithmically z averages aircraft sound levels at a location over a complete 24-hour period, with a 10-decibel adjustment added to those noise events occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 6:59 a.m. (local time)the following morning. The FAA defines the 10:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. period as nighttime (or night) and the 7:00 a.m. to 9:59 p.m. period as daytime(or day). Because of the increased sensitivity to noise during normal sleeping hours and because ambient(without aircraft)sound levels during nighttime are typically about 10 dB lower than during CL daytime hours, the 10-decibel adjustment, or "penalty," represents the added intrusiveness of sounds CL occurring during nighttime hours. N DNL accounts for the noise levels (in terms of SEL) of all individual aircraft events, the number of times those events occur and the period of day/night in which they occur. Values of DNL can be measured with standard monitoring equipment or predicted with computer models such as the AEDT. Typical DNL values for a variety of noise environments are shown in Figure 13.3. DNL values can be approximately 85 dBA outdoors under an aircraft flight path within a mile of a major airport and 40 dBA or less outdoors in a rural residential area. Due to the DNL descriptor's close correlation with the degree of community annoyance from aircraft noise, most federal agencies have formally adopted DNL for measuring and evaluating aircraft noise for land use Page B-5 Packet Pg. 3101 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION planning and noise impact assessment. Federal committees such as the Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (FICUN) and the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), which include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FAA, Department of Defense, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Veterans Administration, found DNL to be the best metric for land use planning. They also found no new cumulative sound descriptors or metrics of sufficient scientific standing to substitute for DNL. Other cumulative metrics are used only to supplement, not replace, DNL. Furthermore, FAA Order 1050.1 E, Policies and Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts, requires DNL be used in describing cumulative noise exposure and in identifying aircraft noise/land use 0 compatibility issues (EPA, 1974; FICUN, 1980; FICON, 1992; title 14 CFR part 150, 2004; FAA, 2006). The accuracy and validity of DNL calculations depend on the basic information used in the calculations. At airports, the reliability of DNL calculations is affected by a number of uncertainties: 06 • The noise descriptions used in the DNL procedure represent the typical human response to aircraft noise. Since people vary in their response to noise and because the physical measure of noise accounts for only a portion of an individual's reaction to that noise, the DNL scale can show only an average response to aircraft noise that may be expected from a community. • Future aviation activity levels such as the forecast number of operations, the operational fleet - mix, the times of operation (day versus night) and flight tracks are estimates. Achievement of forecasted levels of activity cannot be assured. CL • Aircraft acoustical and performance characteristics for new aircraft designs are estimates. CL Figures 13.4 through 13.11 illustrate how we measure aircraft noise and assess its impact. Outdoor vs. Indoor Noise Levels—AEDT calculates outdoor noise levels,while some of the supplemental _ noise analysis effects are based on noise levels experienced indoors. In order to convert outdoor noise levels to indoor noise levels, an Outdoor-to-Indoor Noise Level Reduction (OILR) is identified. The indoor noise level is equal to the outdoor noise level minus the OILR. Based on accepted research, typical OILR values range between 15 dBA to 25 dBA, depending on the structure and whether windows are open or `� 9 P 9 P c� closed (Wyle, 1989). CL CL N T- c� Page B-6 Packet Pg. 3102 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION FIGURE B.3 TYPICAL RANGE OF OUTDOOR COMMUNITY DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVELS 90 Under Flight Path at Major Airport, %to 1 Mile From Runway is >.�y> (U 80 " 72 Downtown in Major Metropolis m icy U) 06 a� Dense Urban Area with Heavy Traffic Q 7 y 0 � W d Urban Area W LLl 0 0 CL Q� Q Suburban and Low Density Urban y� 1 CL R 50 0 Small Town and Quiet Suburban ;j U)>r Rural 40 Source:U.S.Department of Defense. Departments of the Air Force,the Army,and the Navy,1978. Planning in the Noise Eni,h onrnenl. AFM 19-10. TM 5-803-2,and NAVFAC P-970. Washington,D.C.,:U.S.DoD. CL CL a t'J T_ E U Page B-7 Packet Pg. 3103 L.7.1 i O 1r ZLu rg j 1r �a F , 1, E Q U) 06 iQ. 0 cn u w r i j>/��r, W mull /1 wll % mm wuu U O 11 j rlJjl, �( Iry a. " crate �i u "" wa it N CL w r f U) w N Cn ° Z = Ia = n F- O 0Z III �,�u'T y W Y ;1 Div', , gl" Lu W 1. r� 9""„ �!. pmr i � I YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY I ,,c a r(� � � �M� � yi � � 1 11.,. � a puu�1J jM�" CL CL Lu wu�pli��l I jllll�'s U H r w9w4ir LL .r'^�� i r"";ul�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m,I„wvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvi FIGURE B.4 P k P 1 4 9 O W � g Z bo IL +. 0 i caLu i VJ W a to 0 �,.:. "? j .,:�;. tliuCu � r, a I,,,. „"" > li iaWl �k. /k�fwrrr ➢ ��lkr ,�I� // �I f{ fi C. N C. �w ll� w /ON fA uj Z �i Gw �i�U) �a ,� �� , , Ni ° a j Q I X rulj / m(m%/;" cn tl0 j / nLuLLJ / l �a N J Lu Lu cV CL H o a Lli LLJ ` = N c E LL Ln CL a FIGURE B.5 Packet Pg. 3105 L.7.1 ~ 0 IL > a cc 0 3 � . c: g 0 Z c: (D 0 m AS t- Z + C + ' W x l a; 06uy (_n4,4 Co ui 'ma c H _ " U o 0 a O E - N 0- U 11 all _ 1 cn0. cn N ~ a 11 Q cn a 4-4 4 rr J w Z H z O �^ W Lu p � Q J W O CL ?� _ CL c 0 M Q W LL cn cn+ (D 0 O Z O ti ~ LL 0CL 0 U 0 C� � w cz + � z a o 9 -0 O p a 0 � 0 „ Ln � W O. .� z FIGURE B6RE 0 = 4 Packet Pg. 3106 L.7.1 C r ~ O CL a) a rip. Z W CL 06 > E H a Z > CL CL o LLI " Lu N ?cn � m �' N a " �`; Q W (� cal! " w ` —t ,� z > a) 0F0 01 t - Lu LL C ,� Z LLJ I � , wi I s w w � . 2 O W O NI � W 0 I N ?wl > 2 = CN W cu A— cn Z as 0 O w� �' Z Q Q) = LL " JI Ili w .® U) z FIGURE II II Ui B.7 Packet Pg. 3107 L.7.1 I � a W � 3 o_ 9 ~ Z oe W t- Z 0 U) ) > uiuliulV w H Of U 0 a w N CL U) HCL LLJ i UA Lu M ,,✓A ��I�1��lll ..;i�i..r,.�� ,,,,,,,fhi. i�li;;;,., „ 'I�ill�ifuulll�� ir;f, U) uj rrw a O U) j 1l W 0 , W III ��rrrrrroo,�� z . rrrrrrrrrrr�rrr,� �-, U Lu W LL W O CL O CL iuu LL w4' IVPIWN I( jJJ //%r /% /f, r%v oaf r,ii W .. CL O cn V FIGURE B.s lr �ia rrr g. o� / Packet P3108 L.7.1 %r r a 3 �, i r .A6 Z cr W Z J' r, III�� oa :e. Q O b Lu / wrm Ilui 411 � ff(�i'�, � �! � I :luuum �f�l / / % '� 44 0 9IN W if U LL iiiii 1 aC' I Lu a ;� � p Iw�w U) CL C� Irllr U fa COa W �� w CO �. gjii 11 N 00 Q Q � w Q I q O Lu Z l w i )}� mm w 1 J� �I�Jll l�'%�UIIU (�l Q / I, 1 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum I U MT f , TO Lu Lu CL CL i + 1 I o I u o " lio Lu C'4 LL rifff0 IfM �.. 2 Lij cin k m LL 1II w FIGURE ' B.9 ,y Packet Pg. 3109 L.7.1 O 0) E 0 IL m m maw ' W a "0 cot- W " Z O ~ Z 0 O 0 0 co, z I I m„ 06, w � O H _ adU 0 O a O M loot H 0 O N U (A �.. I N N W Q Cn 0 Ln a ~ I '� "~ _ W w E C N O „ G r a 0 w J � 1 � 2 0 0DF CL . . LL = a W Q r L H 0 q) —J O N O Z cs O CZ 0 M J a ui zO O ©C V) Q CC � E uj O a 3 O " W m ° Z U FIGURE LW b - B.10 P � " Packet Pg. 3110 L.7.1 I � a W � 3 o_ 9 ~ Z oe W F Z 0 _0 e) _C w H uuu ) 4 Wa. ~ N ° ) i (�• o u V V VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV %/ C, U l� W mmi ��J/IJJJJ��1IjJJJI%i� `� cn (/) �770, r" 0 Wui � Lu Lu .uuum I //ii r LL y( w CL it r CL CN �0 W Z cn LL V i FIGURE Packet Pg. 3111 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION B.3 EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT NOISE ON PEOPLE The most common effects regarding aircraft noise are related to annoyance and activity interference (e.g., speech disruption and sleep interference). These effects have been studied extensively and relationships between various noise metrics and effects have been established. The following sections summarize these effects, and the noise metrics that are used to describe them. B.3.1 Speech Interference 0 Speech interference is the most readily quantified adverse effect of noise, and speech is the activity most often affected by environmental noise. The levels of noise that interfere with listening to a desired sound, U) such as speech, music, or television, can be defined in terms of the level of noise required to mask the 06 desired sound. Such levels have been quantified for speech communications by directly measuring the interference with speech. Several studies have been conducted over the last 30 years resulting in various noise level criteria for speech interference. As an aircraft approaches and its sound level increases, speech becomes harder to hear. As the ambient level increases,the speaker must raise his/her voice, or the individuals must get closer together to continue W talking. For typical communication distances of 3 or 4 feet (1 to 1.5 meters), acceptable outdoor 0 76 conversations can be carried on in a normal voice as long as the ambient noise outdoors is less than about L_ 65 dBA (FICON, 1992). If the noise exceeds this level, intelligibility would be lost unless vocal effort was CL CL increased or communication distance was decreased. , Indoor speech interference can be expressed as a percentage of sentence intelligibility between two average adults with normal hearing, speaking fluently in relaxed conversation approximately one meter W apart in a typical living room or bedroom (EPA, 1974). Intelligibility pertains to the percentage of speech 0 units correctly understood out of those transmitted, and specifies the type of speech material used, i.e. 0 sentence or word intelligibility (ANSI, 1994). As shown in Figure 13.12, the percentage of sentence intelligibility is a non-linear function of the (steady) indoor ambient or background sound level (energy- average equivalent sound level (Leq)). For an average adult with normal hearing and fluency in the language, steady ambient indoor sound levels of up to 45 dBA Leq are expected to allow 100 percent intelligibility of sentences. The curve shows 99 percent sentence intelligibility for Leq at or below 54 dBA and less than 10 percent intelligibility for Leq greater than 73 dBA. It should be noted that the function is especially sensitive to changes in sound level between 65 dBA and 75 dBA. As an example of the sensitivity, a 1 dBA increase in background sound level from 70 dBA to 71 dBA results in a 14 percent N decrease in sentence intelligibility. In contrast, a 1 dBA increase in background sound level from 60 dBA to 61 dBA results in less than 1 percent decrease in sentence intelligibility. The noise from aircraft events is not continuous, but consists of individual events where the noise level can greatly exceed the background level for a limited period as the aircraft flies over. Since speech interference in the presence of aircraft noise is essentially determined by the magnitude and frequency of individual aircraft flyover events, a time-averaged metric (such as Leq) alone, is not necessarily appropriate when setting standards regarding acceptable levels. In addition to the background levels described above, single event criteria, which account for those sporadic intermittent noisy events, are also essential to specifying Page B-16 Packet Pg. 3112 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION speech interference criteria. In order for two people to communicate reasonably using normal voice levels indoors, the background noise level should not exceed 60 dBA (EPA, 1974). In other words, an indoor noise event that exceeds 60 dBA has the potential to cause speech and communication disruption (Eagan, 2007). Figure B.12 PERCENT SENTENCE INTELLIGIBILITY FOR INDOOR SPEECH 100 a 80 M U) 06 95 60 U) d c d d 40 c m a 20 0 0 > 0 CL 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 CL Steady Indoor A-Weighted Sound Level (dB re:20 micropascals) B.3.2 Effect on Chiidren's Learning 0 An important application of speech interference criteria is in the classroom where the percent of words (rather than whole sentences) transmitted and received commonly referred to as 'word intelligibility,' is critical. For teachers to be clearly understood by their students, it is important that regular voice communication is clear and uninterrupted. Not only does the steady background sound level have to be low enough for the teacher to be clearly heard, but intermittent outdoor noise events also need to be unobtrusive. The steady ambient level, the level of voice communication, and the single event level (e.g., CL aircraft over-flights) that might interfere with speech in the classroom are measures that can be evaluated CL to quantify the potential for speech interference in the classroom. T- Accounting for the typically intermittent nature of aircraft noise where speech is impaired only for the short time when the aircraft noise is close to its maximum value, different researchers and regulatory organizations have recommended maximum allowable indoor noise levels ranging between 40 and 60 dBA LAmax. (Lind, et. al., 1998; Sharp and Plotkin, 1984; Wesler, 1986; WHO, 1999; ASLHA, 1995; ANSI, 2002). A single event noise level of 50 dBA LAmax correlates to 90 percent of the words being understood by students with normal hearing and no special needs seated throughout a classroom (Lind, et. al., 1998). At- risk students may be adversely affected at lower sound levels. Page B-17 Packet Pg. 3113 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION ANSI has developed a standard for classrooms that states that the sound level during the noisiest hour should not exceed a one-hour average Leq of 40 dBA for schools exposed to intermittent noise sources such as aircraft noise(ANSI, 2002). The standard further states that the hourly Leq should not be exceeded for more than 10 percent of the noisiest hour(i.e., Leq should not exceed Lio). FAA Order 5100.38C,Airport Improvement Program Handbook, Chapter 7, Section 2, Paragraph 812c(1) indicates that schools should have an A-weighted Leq of 45 dB, or less, during school hours, in the classroom environment. Facilities not typically disrupted by aircraft,such as gymnasiums,cafeterias, or hallways, are not usually eligible for noise insulation. However, ANSI recommends that schools have a maximum one-hour average A-weighted 0 unsteady background noise level of Leq of 40 dB, or less, during school hours. Ancillary spaces, such as gymnasiums and cafeterias are recommended to have a maximum Leq of 45 dB. U) 06 B.3.3 Sleep Disturbance U) The EPA identified an indoor DNL of 45 dB as necessary to protect against sleep interference (EPA, 1974). Prior to and after the EPA's 1974 guidelines, research on sleep disruption from noise has led to widely varying observations. In part, this is because: (1) sleep can be disturbed without causing awakening, (2) the deeper the sleep the more noise it takes to cause arousal, (3) the tendency to awaken increases with W 4- age, and (4) the person's previous exposure to the intruding noise and other physiological, psychological, 0 and situational factors. The most readily measurable effect of noise on a sleeping person is the number of arousals or awakenings. CL CL A study performed in 1992 by the Civil Aviation Policy Directorate of the Department of Transportation in the United Kingdom concluded that average sleep disturbance rates (those that are unrelated to outdoor noise) are unlikely to be affected by aircraft noise at outdoor levels below an Lamar of 80 dBA (011erhead, _ 1992). At higher levels of 80-95 dBA LAma.the chance of the average person being awakened is about 1 in 75. The study concludes that there is no evidence to suggest that aircraft noise at these levels is likely to increase the overall rates of sleep disturbance experienced during normal sleep. However, the authors emphasize that these conclusions are based on 'average' effects, and that there are more susceptible P 9c� individuals and there are periods during the night when people are more sensitive to noise,especially during the lighter stages of sleep. In June 1997, the U.S. Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN) reviewed the sleep disturbance issue along with data from the 1992 FICON recommendations (which was primarily the result CL CL of many laboratory studies) and presented a new sleep disturbance dose-response prediction curve (FICAN, 1997) as the recommended tool for analysis of potential sleep disturbance for residential areas. N T_ The FICAN curve, shown in Figure B.13, was based on data from field studies of major civilian and military airports. For an indoor SEL of 60 dBA, Figure 13.13 predicts a maximum of approximately 5 percent of the exposed residential population would be behaviorally awakened. FICAN cautions that this curve should only be applied to long-term adult residents. The focus of this research was the human response to individual SELs rather than the response to multiple events in the same night. The relationship of SEL and percent awakenings presented in the figure is for each event, not a cumulative percent awakening for all events during a sleep period. Page B-18 Packet Pg. 3114 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Other studies indicate that for a good night's sleep, the number of noise occurrences plays a role as important as the level of the noise. Vallet &Vernet (1991) recommend that, to avoid any adverse effects on sleep, indoor noise levels should not exceed approximately 45 dBA LAmax more than 10-15 times per night and that lower levels might be appropriate to provide protection for sensitive people. This LAmax level is equivalent to an SEL of approximately 55 dBA indoors. FIGURE B.13 SLEEP DISTURBANCE DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP 50 w FICAN 1997 � 40 Field Studies 06 Y a Fidell et al,2000 t0 R a. a 30 IL �a 20 N uuum wmu„muuu CU E V.Awakenings=0.13 x SEL-6.64 X -p0 � 10 � c6 O CL 0 0 40* CL 20 40 60 80 100 120 Indoor Sound Exposure Level(SEL, dBA) A 0 Griefahn (1978) suggests that awakenings from aircraft overflights are dependent upon the number of events and their sound levels. Figure B.14 illustrates Griefahn's compilation of data indicating the number of events and noise level that constitute a threshold for sleep. The data in her research were based on levels at which the most sensitive 10 percent of the population would be disturbed,and includes a correction _ to these levels to represent the most sensitive sleep state and age group. The lower curve represents the indoor noise level (expressed in terms of LAmax) and number of noise event combinations at which fewer CL CL than 10 percent of the population will show signs of sleep interference. The upper curve indicates the level at which more than 90 percent of the population will be awakened for the given combination of noise levels N and noise events. Griefahn suggests that, to avoid any long-term health effects, the upper curve should not be exceeded. The bottom curve represents a preferred, preventative goal. The curves indicate that E nearly 90 percent of people will show signs of sleep interference in the presence of 10 to 30 flights per night at an approximate indoor LAm.x of 54 dB. They also show that for the same number of flights but at an indoor LAmax of 48 dB, the percentage of the most sensitive population affected is much lower, at less than 10 percent, (with 'no reaction' for the less sensitive population). Page B-19 Packet Pg. 3115 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION FIGURE B.14 NUMBER OF AWAKENINGS AS A FUNCTION OF MAXIMUM INDOOR NOISE LEVEL 66 64 Awakening Reactions 62 y=(-.03+ .129x-.0018x2)-' +53.16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - 68 Indoor 58 L max 56 06 52 U) 58 No Reactions 48 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 28 38 W 4- Number of Noise Events 0 Source: Griefahn, B. (1990). "Critical Loads for Noise Exposure During the Night," InterNoise 90, pg. 1165. CL CL B.3.4 Vibration from Aircraft Operations The effects of vibration in a residence are observed in two ways; it is felt by the occupant, or it causes physical damage to the structure. Subjective detection can be one of direct perception from rattling of windows and ornaments, or dislodgement of hanging pictures and other loose objects. Structural damage 0 may be either architectural (cosmetic or minor effects) such as plaster cracking, movement or dislodgements of wall tiles, cracked glass, etc., or major, such as cracking walls, complete collapsing of ceilings, etc., which is generally considered to impair the function or use of the dwelling. Research has shown that vibration can be felt at levels well below those considered to cause structural damage. Complaints from occupants are usually due to the belief that if vibration can be felt,then it is likely to cause damage. Residents living in proximity to airports often complain that aircraft operations cause CL vibration induced damage to their homes. Research has also shown however, that the slamming of doors CL or footfalls within a building can produce vibration levels above those produced by aircraft activities(Reverb N Acoustics Noise and Vibration Consultants, 2005). Since people spend the majority of time indoors, the perceptions of aircraft noise leading to annoyance or complaint response and potentially to structural/architectural effects are directly and indirectly affected by the building structure. The acoustic loads resulting from aircraft noise can induce vibration in the structure, which can in turn, result in radiation of noise into its interior, rattling of items in contact with the structure, the perception of the occupants that the structure is vibrating, and the assumption that the vibration is causing structural/architectural effects. Consequently, the response of buildings, particularly older Page B-20 Packet Pg. 3116 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION residential structures,to aircraft noise and the resulting effects on human and structural response has been the subject of considerable research. C-weighted metrics appear to correlate well with subjective evaluations of low frequency noise from aircraft operations (Fidell, et al, 2002; Eagan, 2006). Perceptible wall vibrations in homes are likely to occur for C- weighted levels between 75 and 80 dB (Eagan, 2006). The likelihood of rattle due to low frequency noise increases notably for C-weighted levels within the range of 75 to 80 dB(Hubbard, 1982, Fidell, et. al, 2002). Rattle always occurs above a threshold of roughly 97 dB Lmax(Hodgdon, 2007). In addition, C-weighting is the only weighting scale currently in the AEDT that addresses low-frequency noise. However, it should be 0 noted that AEDT predictions are based on extrapolation of A-weighted aircraft sound levels. The same data are used in C-weighted predictions by simply reverse filtering the A-weighted levels. The predictions U) do not extend to frequencies less than 50 Hz where much of rattle and structural response can be attributed. 06 This is a major limitation of AEDT C-weighted predictions for vibration assessment. Generally, fixed-wing subsonic aircraft do not generate vibration levels of a frequency or intensity high enough to result in damage to structures. It has been found that exposure to normal weather conditions, such as thunder and wind, usually have more potential to result in significant structural vibration than aircraft (FAA, 1985). Two studies involving the measurement of vibration levels resulting from aircraft operations W upon sensitive historic structures concluded that aircraft operations did not result in significant structural 0 76 vibration. > 0 CL CL 0 c� CL CL N T_ c� Page B-21 Packet Pg. 3117 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION B.4 REFERENCES Acoustical Society of America. (2010). Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools, Part 1: Permanent schools(ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010/Part 1). American National Standards Institute. Acoustical Society of America. (2013). Acoustical terminology(ANSI/ASA S1.1-2013). American National Standards Institute. Airport noise compatibility planning, 69 F.R. 57622 (2004, September 24). 06 https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/federal register notices/media/environmental 69fr57622e U) df American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1995). Guidelines for acoustics in educational environments. ASHA. Supplement, 37(Suppl. 14), 15-19. 4- 0 Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., & Schwela, D. H. (Eds). (1999). Guidelines for community noise. World Health 0 Organization. https://apps®who.int/iris/handle/10665/66217 CL CL Eagan, M. E. (2007, May 30). Using supplemental metrics to communicate aircraft noise effects. Noisequest. httos://www.noiseauest.osu.edu/K)dfs-documents/effects.pdf Federal Aviation Administration. (1985, March).Aviation noise effects(Report No. FAA-EE-85-2). U.S. A 0 Department of Transportation. httDs://www.nonoise.orq/librarv/ane/ane.htm Federal Aviation Administration. (2006, April). National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) implementing 74 instructions for airport actions(FAA Order 5050.4B) [Policy]. U.S. Department of Transportation. httDs://www.faa.ciov/airports/resources/publications/orders/environmental 5050 4/ CL Federal Aviation Administration. (2015, July). Environmental impacts: Policies and procedures (FAA CL Order 1050.1 F) [Policy]. U.S. Department of Transportation. N T- httDs://www.faa.ciov/documentlibrarv/media/order/faa order 1050 lf.p f Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise. (1997, June). Effects of aviation noise on awakenings a from sleep. htt s://ficanl.files.wordpressmcom/2015/10/findings awakenings 1997,13df Federal Interagency Committee on Noise. (1992, August). Federal agency review of selected airport noise analysis issues. ttps:Hfican1.files.wordDress.com/2015/10/reports noise anal sis.odf Page B-22 Packet Pg. 3118 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise. (1980, June). Guidelines for considering noise in land use planning and control. httpse//www.nonoise.org/epa/Ro117/rolI7doc2O.pdf Fidell, S., Pearsons, K., Silvati, L., &Sneddon, M. (2002). Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1743-1750. httSs,.//doi.org/10.1121/1.1448339 Fidell, S., Pearsons, K., Tabachnick, B. G., & Howe, R. (2000). Effects on sleep disturbance of changes 0 in aircraft noise near three airports. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2535— U) 2548. httpse//doi.ora/l0.1121/1.428641 6 Griefahn, B. (1978, September 25-29). Research on noise disturbed sleep since 1973. In J. Tobias, G. Jansen, &W. D. Ward (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (pp. 377-390). American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 4- httDs://www.ashg.or_q/siteassets/Dublicationa/ashareportsl O.Ddf 0 Hodgdon, K. K,. Atchley, A. A., & Bernhard, R. J. (2007, April). Low frequency noise study(Report No. CL CL PARTNER-COE-2007-001). Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. httpse//ascent.aero/documents/2020/01/low-frequency-noise-study.pdf Horne, J., Pankhurst, F., Reyner, L., 011erhead, J. B., Jones, C. J., Cadoux, R. E., Woodley, A., Atkinson, B. J., Hume, K. I., Van, F., Watson, A., Diamond, I. D., Egger, P., Holmes, D., & Mckean, J. z (1992, December). Report of a field study of aircraft noise and sleep disturbance. Department of c� Transport, England. , Hubbard, H. H. (1982). Noise induced house vibrations and human perception. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 19(2), 49-55. httpse//docs.wind-watch.org/Hubbard -Noise-induced-building-vibrations- CL CL and®human®perception®pdf cN T- Lind S. J., Pearsons K., & Fidell S. (1998). Sound insulation requirements for mitigation of aircraft noise impact on Highline School District facilities(Vol. I, Report No. 8240). BBN Systems and c� Technologies. Office of Noise Abatement and Control. (1974, March). Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect the public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety(Report No. Page B-23 Packet Pg. 3119 L.7.1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 550/9-74.004). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://nppis.epa. ov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/2000L3LN.PDF?Docket'=2000L3L .PDF Reverb Acoustics Noise and Vibration Consultants. (2005, January). Noise impact assessment, Galston Rural Sports Facility, No.'s 18& 20 Bayfield Road, Galston NSW(Report No. 04-772-R1). Hornsby Shire Council. Sharp, B. S., & Plotkin, K. J. (1984, October). Selection of noise criteria for school classrooms(Technical 0 Note TN 84-2). Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. U) 06 Vallet, M., &Vernet, I. (1991). Night aircraft noise index and sleep research results. In A. Lawrence (Ed.), U) Inter-noise 91, The cost of noise (Vol. 1, pp. 207-210). Noise Control Foundation. Wesler, J. E. (1986, October). Priority selection of schools for soundproofing(Technical Note TN 96-8). Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 4- Wyle Research. (1989). Guidelines for the sound insulation of residences exposed to aircraft operations 0 76 [Report]. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. CL CL https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/AdvisoU Circular/150 5000 9a withReport p1 apdf 0 c� c� c� Page B-24 Packet Pg. 3120 L.7.o DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX E PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES E.1 INTRODUCTION 0 14 CFR § 150.21 (b) states, "The airport operator shall certify that it has afforded interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy 06 U) of the draft noise exposure map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Each map and revised map must be accompanied by documentation describing the consultation accomplished under this paragraph and the opportunities afforded the public to review and comment during the development of the map. One copy of all written comments received during consultation shall also be filed with the Regional Airports Division Manager." 4- This appendix includes comments received throughout the development of the Noise Exposure Maps. o 76 Public comments include written comments received by mail and in-person, verbal comments made during L_ the Ad Hoc Committee meetings, verbal comments recorded on the airport's noise hotline, and comments CL CL sent by electronic mail (email). Section E.2 of this appendix contains comments that were received during the development of the NEMs (October 1, 2020, through September 18, 2022). All comments (and responses)were made during Ad Hoc Committee meetings and are summarized in Section E.2. U) Section E.3 of this appendix contains comments that were received during the public review period for the 0 CL Draft NEM Update Report (September 19 - October 20, 2022). Comments (and responses) made during the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on October 4, 2022 are summarized in Section E.3. A list of all parties that commented during the public review period is included in Section E.3. U) E.2 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS RECEIVED DURING DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEMs All comments and questions received during the development of the NEMs were received during Ad Hoc U Committee meetings. They are summarized below, along with responses as appropriate. .2 E.2.1 October 6, 2020, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting CL Robert Gold asked what the process would be and whether it would be a public process. Pam Meck asked if information would be posted on the Ad Hoc Committee website. It was explained that progress reports would be provided to the committee at each meeting and information that has been approved by the FAA CL CL would be posted on the website. Interim and/or deliberative information would not be posted. LO Peter Horton commented that noise contours representing 2020 would be very narrow because of the reduced number of operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was explained that this will be discussed with the FAA. c� E.2.2 December 1, 2020, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Avery preliminary noise contour was presented that roughly represented operations for 2020. Peter Horton commented that these contours representing 2020 do not serve the public in illustrating the impact they Page E-1 Packet Pg. 3121 L.7.o DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION experience. Michael Sullivan commented that these contours are inaccurate, and that sentiment was shared by many others in attendance. A lengthy discussion followed, including questions regarding field noise measurements, flight tracks, and number of operations. It was explained that the NEM Update was being prepared in accordance with all FAA guidelines and requirements and would be as accurate as possible. 0 E.2.3 March 2, 2021, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting U) David Rooney asked why the daytime period in the formula for DNL went all the way until 10 p.m., rather 06 than something like 6 p.m. Robert Gold asked if there was any opportunity to change the formula, i.e., the U) definition of the daytime period; is it defined by the FAA; has the formula ever been changed; and is the same standard applied to all airports regardless of size. It was explained that this is how the metric is defined; the FAA requires that this be used for development of airport noise contours; and it is applied to all airports regardless of size. It was further explained that a metric called CNEL is used in California and includes an evening period in addition to daytime and nighttime. David Rooney asked if the DNL 65 was 0 the FAA's limit for Key West, i.e., if the noise level is higher is mitigation required? It was explained that noise levels of DNL 65 dB and above are considered noncompatible for residential and other noise-sensitive CL land uses and areas exposed to DNL 65 dB and above are considered eligible for noise mitigation by the CL FAA. David Rooney asked if any aircraft types are forbidden from using EYW because of their noise level. It was explained that as long as aircraft meet the FAA's noise standards the airport has very little control over which aircraft types can use the airport. U) a E.2.4 June 1, 2021, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting CL U) Bud Griner commented that the A319s (in particular) lock their brakes, spool up, and then release their brakes to take off. Andrea Haynes commented that this was referred to as a static takeoff. Regarding the use of the full runway length for departures on Runway 09, Bud Griner commented that some of the U) EMB170s and EMB175s and all Silver departures are asking (more and more frequently) to back-taxi to use the extra 271 feet or runway length. Peter Horton asked if the extra runway can be used for landing, or E E just takeoff. It was explained that it was only available for takeoff on Runway 09. U 2 Regarding flight track development, Bud Griner asked if the modeled tracks were developed visually or otherwise. It was explained that the tracks can be drawn "by hand" and digitized, or they can be developed CL in GIS. Peter Horton asked about the source of the flight tracks. It was explained that these tracks came from FlightRadar24 collected using an ADS-B receiver located on the airport. Peter Horton asked about data from the Navy (like we requested in the past). It was explained that it was very difficult to obtain any CL CL data from the Navy, and once it was finally obtained, it turned out to be unusable. It was further explained that twelve months of FlightRadar24 data would be used to make the final determination of the flight tracks , T_ and utilization. Marlene Durazo asked if this could be compared to the same period in 2019. It was explained ; that data from 2019 was not available to the study team. E.2.5 October 5, 2021, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Nick Pontecorvo commented that aircraft are over the water at the point of the 2,000-ft hold down on departure. Page E-2 Packet Pg. 3122 L.7.o DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION E.2.6 December 7, 2021, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Peter Horton questioned why nearly 20,000 operations seemed to be missing from the FR24 data.A lengthy discussion ensued regarding possible reasons for this, what other available data sources might be used to 0 supplement the analysis, and how the proportionality constant was being used to account for the missing ° operations. Peter Horton expressed concern that the public will not trust the data being used to develop the U) contours. It was explained that the data would be reviewed, and additional sources of data would be 06 investigated. E.2.7 March 1, 2022, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Z Kim Ledford commented that the air traffic controllers at NAS KW handle aircraft between 9:00 pm (when the EYW ATCT closes) and 10:00 pm, and Miami Center handles aircraft between 10:00 pm (when the NAS KW ATCT closes) and 7:00 am (when the EYW ATCT opens). She commented further that OPSNET 4- includes nighttime IFR operations. o 76 Kim Ledford commented regarding helicopters operated by the military. She also commented that Delta 0 CL operates CRJ aircraft for their final arrival, and those operations are not reflected in the presentation. Erick CL D'Leon agreed that was true. It was explained that this apparent discrepancy would be investigated. E.2.8 June 7, 2022, Ad Hoc Committee Meeting James Seadler questioned the use of operations from FY'21 for the existing condition and asked if a U) comparison had been made to more recent operations. It was explained that the study had to "take a snapshot in time" to prepare the noise contours. It was further explained there was significant discussion CL U) regarding the use of pre-pandemic operations vs operations during the pandemic. Ultimately it was decided that operations from FY'21 would be the best for the existing condition. U) E.3 COMMENTS SUBMITTED DURING THE PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD Comments and questions were received during the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on October 4, 2022. They E 0 are summarized below, along with responses as appropriate. U c� James Seadler commented that the presentation regarding comparison of operations and fleet mix for FY'21 and August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022 (which was the most recent available data from the FAA)was appreciated. It was interesting to see that there were less operations during the most recent twelve month. Peter Horton asked if the December 7, 2022 BOCC meeting would be held in Key West. It was explained LO that this meeting would be held in Key Largo. He questioned whether this would be appropriate since anyone who wanted to attend would have to drive all the way to Key Largo. It was explained that the November BOCC meeting would be held in Key West. E c� In addition to comments and questions received during the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on October 4, ° 2022, one written comment was received during the comment period for the Draft NEM Update Report (September 19- October 20, 2022). A copy of this written comment is included below. Page E-3 Packet Pg. 3123 L.7.o DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 0 Key West i ,e fW06 International Airport z DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND SUPPORTING OCU E T TI PUBLIC REVIEW-COMMENT FORM - Please use the space below to provide your comments regarding the assumptions used in the ra development of the Noise Exposure Maps(NEMs)far Key west International Airport.Your comments 0 will be reviewed and considered in the Final NEM Report submitted to the Federal Aviation CL CL Administration(FAA).Thank you for your interest and participation. Please.note:All comments may be made publicly available. � Please scan and email this farm to dehorah! urahy.ia�os a mail darn or mail it to: Key West International Airport Administrative Office,3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd.,Key West,FL 33040. U) Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.local time on Thursday,October 20,2022., U) First and Last Name: �d � k� 'd�'� 0 ® t) 1 Address: Email Address: 1" t) Phone Number: ; 6F 'M E Date: t:a K _ ..n. 0 n' � IIL , ,, CL CL CL wi )t J / tIS LO G � 4i E U Page E-4 Packet Pg. 3124 L.7.o DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION DRAFT EYW NEM COMMENT FORM,CONTINUED 0 'L3 " w LLB > 0 CL CL C'K" 0 CL E E 0 u 2 CL CL CL Lo T- E c� Page E-5 Packet Pg. 3125 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION E.4 REFERENCES Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, 14C.F.R.§1SO (1084). 0 06 � � T- L.7.p DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX F NEM REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE DOCUMENTATION 0 F.1 INTRODUCTION 06 14 CFR § 150.21 (a) states, "Each airport operator may after completion of the consultations and public 2 procedure specified under paragraph (b) of this section submit to the Regional Airports Division Manager five copies of the noise exposure map (or revised map) which identifies each noncompatible land use in each area depicted on the map, as of the date of submission..." 14 CFR § 150.21 (b) states, "The airport operator shall certify that it has afforded interested persons W 4- adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy o 76 of the draft noise exposure map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations." CL 14 CFR § 150.21 (c) states, "The Regional Airports Division Manager acknowledges receipt of noise CL exposure maps and descriptions and indicates whether they are in compliance with the applicable requirements. The Regional Airports Division Manager publishes in the FEDERAL REGISTER a notice of compliance for each such noise exposure map and description, identifying the airport involved." 14 CFR § 150.21 (f)(1) states, "Title 49, section 47506 provides that no person who acquires property or 0 an interest therein after the date of enactment of the Act in an area surrounding an airport with respect to which a noise exposure map has been submitted under section 47503 of the Act shall be entitled to recover damages with respect to the noise attributable to such airport if such person had actual or constructive knowledge of the existence of such noise exposure map unless, in addition to any other elements for o recovery of damages, such person can show that— (i) A significant change in the type or frequency of aircraft operations at the airport; or C (�) 9 9 YP q Y P PCL (ii) A significant change in the airport layout; or (iii) A significant change in the flight patterns; or (iv)A significant increase in nighttime operations; occurred after the date of the acquisition of such property or interest therein and that the damages for which recovery is sought have resulted from any such change or increase." 14 CFR § 150.21 (f)(2) states, "Title 49 section 47506(b) further provides: That for this purpose, constructive knowledge'shall be imputed, at a minimum,to any person who acquires property or an interest therein in an area surrounding an airport after the date of enactment of the Act if— (i) Prior to the date of such acquisition, notice of the existence of a noise exposure map for such CL area was published at least three times in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in CL which such property is located; or (ii)A copy of such noise exposure map is furnished to such person at the time of such acquisition." ; 14 CFR § 150.21 (g) states, "For this purpose, the term significant in paragraph (f) of this section E means that change or increase in one or more of the four factors which results in a "substantial new noncompatible use" as defined in § 150.21(d), affecting the property in issue. Page F-1 Packet Pg. 3127 L.7.p DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Responsibility for applying or interpreting this provision with respect to specific properties rests with local government." Pursuant to these requirements, the following documentation will be included in this appendix (as o appropriate): • Airport Owner's Transmittal Letter to the FAA U) 06 • Airport Owner's Certification U) • FAA's NEM Compliance Determination • Federal Register Noise Exposure Map Notice • Proof of Publication for NEM Compliance Legal Notice F.2 REFERENCES 0 Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, 14 C.F.R.§150 (1984). htt�se//www®ecfragov/current/title-14/chapter® CL CL I/subchapter-1/cart-150 49 U.S.C. §47503 (2011). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title49/pdf/USCODE-2011- title49-su tit eVl l®partB-chac475-su cha 1-sec47503. df 0 49 U.S.C. §47506 (2020).hjWsjLwww. cvinfo.gov/content/p QSC0DE-2020-tit1e49/pdf/USCQQE- 2020-title49-su titleVll-partB-chac475-subchapl-sec47506. of E c� 0 c� CL c� LL c� CL CL E c� Page F-2 Packet Pg. 3128 L.7.p i Key West 0 U) International Airport li� W z AIRPORT OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATION The Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs)for Key West International Airport, hereby submitted in accordance with title 14 CFR part 150, were prepared with the best available information and are certified as true and W complete to the best of the Airport Operator's knowledge and belief. Each map and related documentation 0 were developed and prepared in accordance with Appendix A of 14 CFR part 150. 0 CL CL The assumptions and activity levels used to develop the 2022 Existing Condition NEM are based on data from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021 (FFY 2021). Because the data used to develop the existing condition noise contours does not match the year on the airport operator's planned NEM submittal >- letter to the FAA(2022), the airport operator has verified that data in the documentation are representative of the existing condition as of the date of submission. Data for the most recent 12-month period of 2 operations at EYW were examined and support the airport operator's certification that the FFY 2021 data is representative of the year on the airport operator's NEM submittal letter (2022). The analysis of recent data shows there has not been a substantial change in aircraft activity.The yearly day-night average sound 0 level contours depicted on the 2022 NEM accurately represent the cumulative noise exposure resulting from the operation of EYW as of the airport operator's NEM submittal letter(2022). The assumptions and activity levels used to develop the Future Condition NEM are based on reasonable CL forecasts and other planning assumptions. The Future Condition NEM is based on data generated for a timeframe at least five years in the future from the year of submission (2022). The Future Condition NEM developed for 2028 accurately represents the FAA's forecast for 2028.The noise contours representing the future condition are identified as the 2028 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map. The NEMs were prepared in consultation with state, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the NEMs. The consultation also included federal officials having local responsibility and regular aeronautical users of the airport. It is further certified that adequate opportunity has been afforded interested persons to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the Noise Exposure Maps CL and the supporting documentation and forecasts. CL Date of Signature Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Monroe County Page F-3 Packet Pg. 3129 L.7.p ro � roro / ro "Ago Ke We st U) 7 ro I ro ro International o- December 1, 2022 4- 0 Mr, Peter M. Green 76 Environmental Specialist o CL Federal Aviation Administration CL Orlando Airports District Office 8427 Southpark Circle, Suite 400 Orlando, Florida 32819 0 RE: 14 CFR PART 150 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS SUBMITTAL FOR FAA COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION Dear Mr., Green: 0 c� Enclosed is one (1) hard copy and one (1) flash drive of Key West International Airport's 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) and supporting documentation... These NEMs and supporting documentation are submitted under the provisions of Title 49 United States Code, Chapter 475 and 14 CFR part 150. Monroe County, as owner and operator of Key West International Airport, is submitting these NEMs and supporting documentation for appropriate Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determination. Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed document, please do not hesitate to contact me at 305-809-5200, We appreciate your assistance in this matter, Sincerely, Richard Strickland ; Senior Director of Airports E Monroe County Enclosures Page F-4 Packet Pg. 3130 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 2 MUNICIPAL JURISDICTIONS AND LAND USE 2.1 INTRODUCTION Within the general study area shown on Figure 2.1, there are two municipal jurisdictions: the City of Key West and the County of Monroe. In addition, the U.S. Navy has authority within the Naval Air Station Key West (NAS Key West) and all areas within the U.S. Military Reservation. In addition to the main air station on Boca Chica Key, NAS Key West includes several separate annexes in the Key West area. The airport is within the jurisdiction of Monroe County, while areas surrounding the airport on the island of Key West are within the jurisdiction of the City of Key West. The portion of Stock Island located south of the Overseas Highway (US 1) is within the County's jurisdiction while the northern portion of the island is within the jurisdiction of the City of Key West. The Detailed Study Area shown on Figure 2.2 was defined to encompass areas most affected by aircraft noise. This section describes the existing land uses, future land uses, and noise-sensitive sites in the vicinity of Key West International Airport(EYW). It also addresses the land use controls in the City of Key West and the County of Monroe. 2.2 EXISTING LAND USE An inventory and review of the existing land use patterns and characteristics is strategic in determining the compatibility of an airport with the surrounding environment. Identifying residential and other noise-sensitive land uses is instrumental in this process. Title 14 CFR, Aeronautics and Space, part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Appendix A, §A150.101, Noise contours and land usages, requires the identification of noncompatible land uses, as well as noise sensitive public buildings (such as schools, hospitals, and health care facilities), and properties on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Noncompatible land uses within the Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)65 dB noise contour include, but are not limited to, all residential land uses. Land use compatibility guidelines are presented in Section 2.6. The land use data in this section are based on digital land use maps obtained from the Monroe County Planning and Zoning Department in December 2020 and digital parcel data obtained from the Monroe County Property Appraiser's Office in January 2021 specifically for this NEM Update. Digital data was obtained from Ricondo & Associates that was compiled for the Environmental Assessment completed in January 2021. In addition to their generalized land use data, Ricondo & Associates also provided their historical resources, parks and recreation, and community facilities data. The existing land uses, location of noise sensitive public buildings, community facilities, and parks and recreational facilities within the Detailed Study Area were reviewed and verified via windshield or walking surveys in 2021. Corrections to the digital maps were made as needed. Figure 2.3 depicts the existing land uses near EYW. The following subsections describe the existing land uses surrounding the airport. Page 5 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2.2.1 Residential Low-density residential land uses(including single-family and multi-family with less than 10 units)within the Detailed Study Area are located north and west of Runway 09-27. Riviera Shores Coral Estates, Key Estates, and Ser-Deb Estates Subdivisions are located north of the airport, between the airport and Flagler Avenue. Subdivisions north of Flagler Avenue include, but are not limited to, Lime Grove and Coral Reef Estates. There are also low-density residential land uses west of the airport. There are several high-density residential land uses (including condominiums, townhouses, and multi- family with 10 units or more)within the Detailed Study Area. Key West by the Sea Condominiums is located at 2601 South Roosevelt Boulevard, southwest of the airport. Las Salinas Condominiums (3930 Seaside Drive), Seaside Key West Residences(1 Seaside Drive), Salt Ponds Condominiums(3675 Seaside Drive), and Ocean Walk Apartments (3900 South Roosevelt Boulevard) are all located west of South Roosevelt Boulevard, northeast of the airport. Flagler Court Townhomes are located at 3075 Flagler Avenue, north of the airport between 121"Street and Kennedy Drive.Approximately 24 single-family attached homes(single- family dwellings that are attached to other units by common walls) are located in the 1400 block of 12t" Street and Sun Terrace. The Housing Authority of the City of Key West operates a public housing community located in the 1200 block of 1st Street, between Fogarty Avenue and Vivian Lane, which is located in the northwest corner of the Detailed Study Area. Five hotels/resorts are located on South Roosevelt Boulevard within the Detailed Study Area: Doubletree Grand Key Resort (3990 South Roosevelt Boulevard), Sunrise Suites Resort (3685 Seaside Drive), Hampton Inn (3755 South Roosevelt Boulevard), Hyatt Windward Pointe Resort (3675 South Roosevelt Boulevard), and Margaritaville Beach House Key West (2001 South Roosevelt Boulevard). Hotels and resorts are designated as transient lodging, which is considered a residential land use for part 150 purposes. 2.2.2 Community Facilities Key West High School is located at 2100 Flagler Avenue,which is immediately west of the airport, adjacent to the extended centerline of Runway 09-27. Grace Lutheran School is located at 2713 Flagler Avenue, on the northwest corner of Flagler and 10t" Street. The following seven daycares are located within the Detailed Study Area: Grace Lutheran Daycare (2713 Flagler Avenue), Key West Preschool Cooperative(2610 Flagler Avenue),Zoll Family Daycare Home(2019 Flagler Avenue), Smallbone Family Day Care Home(2115 Flagler Avenue), Segura Family Day Care Home (3018 Flagler Avenue), Lamadrid Family Day Care Home (1524 5t" Street), and Martinez Family Day Care Home (1921 Venetia Street). The following four places of worship are located within the Detailed Study Area: Peace Covenant Presbyterian Church (2610 Flagler Avenue), Grace Lutheran Church (2713 Flagler Avenue), Iglesia De Dios Restauracion (Restoration Church of God) (1316 5t" Street), and Key West Church of Christ (1700 Von Phister Street). Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Miami is a non-profit social service agency serving those most in need in south Florida. St. Bede's Village, located at 2700 Flagler Avenue, was dedicated on March 15, Page 6 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2021. It consists of a complex of housing modules and staff office space and includes 37 units of affordable housing. An additional 10 units are planned to be built. The Monroe Association for ReMARCable Citizens is a non-profit agency that serves adult clients within Monroe County who have developmental disabilities. A group home for six clients is located at 1722 Von Phister Street with 24 hour a day supervision to assist the clients with daily activities. The following six health care facilities are located within the Detailed Study Area: Fresenius Kidney Care Dialysis Center (3214 Flagler Avenue), Key West Medical Center (2505 Flagler Avenue), TCM Chinese Medicine & Acupuncture (2027 Flagler Avenue), Island Dental (1721 Flagler Avenue), Key West Urgent Care (1501 Government Road), and Key West Cannabis Clinic (1805 Staples Avenue). These community facilities are shown on Figure 2.4. 2.2.3 Parks and Recreational Properties Nine parks and/or recreational properties are within the Detailed Study Area. These facilities are shown on Figure 2.4 and are described below. Smathers Beach is located on the Atlantic Ocean along South Roosevelt Boulevard and is owned by the City of Key West. It offers a beach, swimming area, picnic area, jet ski rentals, beach volleyball nets, volleyball courts and restroom/shower facilities. Riggs Wildlife Refuge/Bridle Path is located on South Roosevelt Boulevard, across the street from Smathers Beach, and is owned by the City of Key West. The Bridle Path was constructed as a tourist attraction and is comprised of a 1.2-mile sandy path that runs along the Salt Ponds. It is no longer continuous and is often used for parking by visitors to the nearby beach. In addition, there is an observation deck overlooking the Salt Ponds. Little Hamaca City Park, located on the north side of the airport on Government Road, is part of a former coastal defense missile site. The Park is owned by the City of Key West and has boardwalks and mulched trails. Fran Ford White-crowned Pigeon Preserve at Little Hamaca Park is an undeveloped conservation area owned by the City of Key West(associated with Little Hamaca City Park) established in 2003. Pines Park is a small County-owned public park located on airport property at 3501 South Roosevelt Boulevard at the entrance to the airport. The Park has several concrete picnic tables and benches but does not have recreational equipment or offer scheduled activities. The 11 t" Street Public Boat Ramp, owned by the City of Key West, has a public boat ramp and a paved area for car and trailer parking. The boat ramp provides access to the Riviera Canal. It is located along the Riviera Canal at 11 t" Street and Riviera Drive north of the airport. Florida Keys Overseas Paddling Trail (FKOPT) is a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)-managed recreational paddling trail in the Atlantic Ocean that extends approximately 100 miles along the east side of the Florida Keys from Key Largo to Key West. The FKOPT is Segment 15 of the Florida Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail. Near the airport, the FKOPT is approximately 500 to 900 feet south of the shoreline. Page 7 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) is an FDEP-managed recreational pathway that provides more than 90 miles of paved pathway segments that are part of a planned 106-mile corridor from Key Largo to Key West. Near the airport,the FKOHT runs between South Roosevelt Boulevard and the Atlantic Ocean. Wickers Sports Complex is a recreational area owned by the City of Key West located at the northeast corner of Flagler Avenue and Kennedy Drive. It is comprised of a softball field and a football field with games occurring throughout the year. Blake Fernandez Skate Park is a modern 7,500 square foot facility owned by the City of Key West that includes open space for skateboards and in-line skates, as well as the following structures: grind rails, half and quarter pipes,jump boxes, and ramps. It is located at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 14th Street. 2.2.4 Historical Resources A historical resources survey was conducted for the recently completed Environmental Assessment (Cultural Resources Assessment Survey for the Key West International Airport Improvements, Janus Research, June 2020, SHPO/FDHR Project File Number 2020-1109). Additional references, including documents and site file forms, obtained from the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) in Tallahassee, were consulted including Cultural Resources Desktop Analysis and Reconnaissance of SR A1A/S Roosevelt Boulevard from Bertha Street to the East End of Smathers Beach in the City of Key West, Monroe County, Florida (FMSF Manuscript No. 22767), Key West Historic Resources Survey 2011, City of Key West Planning Department, Key West, Monroe County, Florida, (FMSF Manuscript No. 19527), A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for North Roosevelt (SR5) and South Roosevelt(SR A 1A) Boulevard from Jose Marti StreeVEisenhower Drive to Bertha Street in Monroe County, Florida (FMSF Manuscript No. 5922), An Architectural Inventory Naval Air Station Key West(FMSF Manuscript No. 6771), Site File form for Meacham Field/Key West Airport (8MO1888), and Historic Resources Survey of Key West, Monroe County, Florida. (FMSF Manuscript No. 11157). The FMSF background search identified a total of 489 previously recorded historical resources within the Detailed Study Area and they are shown on Figure 2.5. These include five resources within the boundaries of the Key West International Airport property: Meacham Field/Key West Airport(8MO1888), East Martello Tower (8MO211), East Martello Battery (8MO1877), Bravo Hawk Missile Site (8MO3611), and Driver's License Office (8MO2701). There are no National Register-listed historical districts within the Detailed Study Area. In 1927, landowner Malcom Meacham leased acreage to Pan American World Airways for the construction of an airfield at the southeastern side of the island. A short dirt runway and hangar, known as Meacham Field, were constructed. Pan American operations at Meacham Field ceased in 1928 when the company relocated its headquarters to Miami. Between 1929 and 1941, the airstrip was used for private flights. Shortly after the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, the US Army constructed two paved runways. In late 1942, control of the field was assumed by the Navy, at which point it became a base for lighter-than-air craft(LTA), or blimps, which were used for coastal patrols. Local government took control of the airstrip in the 1950s,the runways were realigned and lengthened,and in 1957 a passenger terminal was constructed. Meacham Field was then renamed Key West International Airport. Because the historic elements of Meacham Field, including the original footprint of the runways and blimp pads, have been highly altered or Page 8 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION destroyed, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) determined that Meacham Field (8MO1888) is not eligible for listing in the NRHP on May 25, 2007. The East Martello Tower is located at 3501 South Roosevelt Boulevard near the entrance to the airport. The East Martello Tower was originally constructed in the 1860s as a defense tower during the Civil War. However, construction was not completed, as this type of defense was proven obsolete before the end of the War. In 1950, the East Martello Tower was converted into an art and historical museum. The East Martello Tower (8MO211) was listed in the NRHP on June 19, 1972. The Tower is a publicly owned historical resource and is located on EYW property. The parcel containing the Tower is leased from the County by the Key West Art and Historical Society. Currently, the East Martello Tower houses a museum containing local artifacts, historical records, and military memorabilia. The East Martello Battery and the Bravo Hawk Missile Site were recorded in 1995 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of An Architectural Inventory Naval Air Station Key West, Key West, Florida (FMSF Manuscript No. 6771).This report dated the East Martello Battery(8MO1877)to the 1940s during the World War II period of significance for Naval Air Station Key West, however the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) form for the resource lists a year-built date of 1966. The East Martello Battery (8MO1877)was considered eligible for listing in the NRHP for its association with World War II defense systems in Key West. However, it has not been evaluated by the SHPO and no determination has been made regarding its National Register eligibility. The SHPO determined that the Bravo Hawk Missile Site (8MO3611) was ineligible for listing in the NRHP on June 29, 1995. The Driver's License Office was recorded by Janus Research in 1997 as part of the A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for North Roosevelt(SR 5) and South Roosevelt(SR A 1A) Boulevard from Jose Marti StreeVEisenhower Drive to Bertha Street in Monroe County, Florida (FMSF Manuscript No. 5922). The SHPO determined that the Driver's License Office (8MO2701) was ineligible for listing in the NRHP on November 17, 1998. The building, located at 3439 South Roosevelt Boulevard, is currently in use as a Greyhound Bus Station. A total of 484 previously recorded historical resources are located within the Detailed Study Area outside of the EYW property. A total of 480 of these 484 previously recorded historical resources have been determined ineligible for listing in the NRHP (439), or insufficient information was available to determine eligibility (41). There are four previously recorded historical resources located within the Detailed Study Area outside of the Key West International Airport property that were considered eligible for listing in the NRHP but have not been evaluated by the SHPO. All are private residences. They are located as follows: 1. 1414 5t" Street (MO04564) 2. 1528 12t" Street(MO04581) 3. 2103 Flagler Avenue (MO04925) 4. 2106 Seidenberg Avenue (MO05753) It should be noted that the private residence located at 2103 Flagler Avenue participated in the airport's Noise Insulation Program in 2006. Windows and doors were replaced, and hurricane shutters were Page 9 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION installed. These feature modifications which result in loss of integrity may result in the structure being ineligible for listing in the NRHP 2.3 FUTURE LAND USE The City of Key West's Future Land Use Map(Map FLU-1, City of Key West—2030 Future Land Use Map, (Ord. No. 17-14, Exh. A, 10-17-2017; Ord. No. 21-05 § 22 2-18 2021)), which is included in their Comprehensive Plan, City of Key West, Florida (Codified through Ordinance No. 21-05, enacted February 18) 2021 (Supp. No. 2)), is shown on Figure 2.6. According to the Comprehensive Plan, Objective 1-1.1, the Future Land Use Map depicts the City's vision for its future development through the provision and location of specific future land use districts. All development and redevelopment in the City shall be in accordance with the Map, as it may be amended from time to time. Policy 1-1.1.1, states that the Future Land Use Map shall contain an adequate supply of land in each district to meet the demands of the existing and future population, and the City shall ensure that infrastructure and services are or will be made available to meet the needs of this projected population. 2.4 DEMOGRAPHICS Demographics data was compiled for Key West, Monroe County,the State of Florida,and the United States. As indicated in Table 2.1,the population of Monroe County decreased by approximately 0.258 percent from 1990 to 2020, while the population of Key West increased by approximately 0.155 percent during the same period. The forecast for the next 10 years predicts a 2.057-percent increase in Monroe County's population. Data was not available for predicted population in Key West. Page 10 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2.1 HISTORICAL AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE POPULATION LEVELS U.S. FLORIDA MONROE KEY WEST YEAR COUNTY POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION 1990 248,709,873 1 12,938,0715 7810245 247 8327 2000 281142119062 15198278245 7915895 2574788 2010 308,745,5383 18,802,8476 7390905 24,6498 2020 332,639,0004 21,596,0686 7718235 24,8685 2025 344,234,0004 23,13875536 7817996 NA 2030 355110110004 24141971276 7914246 NA Sources: 1 U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, 1990 Census of Population, General Population Characteristics, United States, 1990 CP-1-1, 1992. 2 U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, U.S. Summary: 2000, Census 2000 Profile, C2 KP RO F/00-U S, 2002 3 U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, United States Summary: 2010, Population and Housing Unit Counts, 2010 Census of Population and Housing, CPH-2-1, 2012 4 U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, 2017 National Population Projections Tables 5 Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Florida Population Studies. Florida Estimates of Population 2020, April 2020. 6 Bureau of Economic and Business Research, BEBR Bulletin 190, June 2021. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990 Census of Population, General Population Characteristics, Florida, Section 1 of 2. 1990 CP-1-11 8 Bureau of Economic and Business Research. Florida Population: Census Summary 2010,April 2011. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates The Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) at the University of Florida produces population estimates for Florida and each of its cities and counties using the housing unit method. This is the most commonly used method for making local population estimates in the United States. BEBR defines households as housing units occupied by permanent residents. BEBR estimated that there were 35,320 households in Monroe County on April 1, 2020, with an average household size of 2.14. The estimates of households and average household size were produced prior to the release of Census 2020. QuickFacts is a United States Census Bureau application that provides tables, maps,and charts of statistics from many censuses, surveys, and programs. QuickFacts provides statistics for all states and counties, and for cities and towns with a population of 5,000 or more. The QuickFacts definition indicates a household includes all the persons who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live and eat separately from any other persons in the building, and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. The Page 11 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION occupants may be a single family, one person living alone,two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated persons who share living arrangements. (People not living in households are classified as living in group quarters.) Persons per household, or average household size, is obtained by dividing the number of persons in households by the number of households (or householders). The QuickFacts source of information for households and persons per household is the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year Estimates. The Survey is updated every year. Data was retrieved for the Key West city, Florida. QuickFacts estimated that between 2015 and 2019 there were 10,501 households in Key West, with an average household size of 2.25. The land area is 5.59 square miles, and the population per square mile in 2010 was 4,411.8. Page 12 a;epdn W3N w c� SNOI1oIasiunr 1dd1:)INnw 121Od211d IVNO11VNH31N1 1S3M A3M aNd d3HV Aanis lVH3N30cu �yIN CL co r ! bJ 5„ / y`Z3 I CLC�JS� 0 Q r� l� �IUWNH�MNNY cj, 0 �I IIJ�Q I FJ �, C7 ill Q C/) x 4rylr, ➢ r t �pD � C1 i v/ a W I � WH /a41. Lb w� • Qf ui iffiq Vl LU C1 Z I O `♦ �YCD � ��f�, v`Ye � � iM aU ALtl } i iff "j r uvf r1 f6 E- L.L C y 9 f �wr 1�� 1111 CN fj g 3 Jill v� olf VVV"' itl 1 C ?ar I 5Pcl k b� U) m o �, nn f . m G;;p a� � . O � 1mIN m U ! m� (n W �a J/hill""eGl �` � ✓ M ��II I��1AAA LU J co n 1 O LU � m z C,�S U) + 70 O U) cn O U W Z 0 Ell]tfl)3� 0 0 W: Wd 90 9Z e ZZOZ/oZ/e:paneg ale(]'pxw'suoiloipsunr IedioiunW pue eaay Rpnlg IeaauaE)3-Z aan6i3\saanbi3\sdewlalepdn W3N-1saM Ra>{\sloafoJd\O�-l'saleioossy�?so6eq Agdanh geaoge(]\xogdoa(]\000'ae6pa alep\saasN\o filed 94epdn IA13N X Lu .LHOdHIV IVNOI.LVNM3.LNI v3mv Acin.Ls a3imna cu IS3M A3M lel,44 A, �,4............ 16ko" o� S,, s AI,:',fell" P, '00 A O�w j 0!" a o�,s 4� f of, No P, 'z" I pro "I J IL 'IF 50. A v io "o,jf0l' '4�� A, 4, >1 0 v �;IN 73 c cu 0 =1 0 LO N I Mq 1111,121C 0 ga'j�' w 0' z _0 cu LU =3 _0 =3 z U) VA Cl) -0 ,'If AP cu 4— INNER! l i WIN hd ZE:Ct7:6 ZZOZ/6�/2:PgAE!S OIE!C]'PXLU'VajVApnjS pel!E!19(]Z-Z ajnBi=j\sajnbi=I\sdew\ajupdn H3N 158M AaA\ST3G!OJd\O-n'S91u!oossV�?sobe-1 Aqdjnh qejoqe(]\xoqdoici\000jE!Bpe-aiup\sjesn\:o:qlud 9;epdn IA13N X Lu .LMOdMIV IVNOI.LVNM3.LNI 3sn aNVI ONIISIX3 cu IS3M A3M g 0 E 's cu 0 E U CO 4 CM -0 (1) C: o C: 0 <- 2 2 'E5) L -E I 1 -0 0 0 -0 0 Lp Lp Lp cn a) U) a) cu E 0 n (n 0 cm E W W a) a) cu 0 S-. C'i >"N>MI ..........�I/ LU CD cu LU —i U) cu 0 (D _0 w C: _0 =3 C: z U) 0 :3 + co 0 A.- 00 E L. 4— Q) C: 0 a) C L) 0 Co CO =3 a) U 0 % 0 N a) m a) R, CO 0 0 4) E Q) "s, c: �,'A.......... 0 cQ a) 0 Lu 0 2 0 foat"o,fwaawagii 4) fo 551 N1, 0-Oh A 'A%de po I OF "INA fm 7 4/r," �A g)" -ar/�QI- -I, Sth'Ter �gg j N&O,a '11, E v ff ........... M/ 0 z 8tH St i7th Ter A7, /' ,, , 11�1'1 3 J/k,1), tAtT, t,(" 'f, C� 16th Ter A, Y, 4 1h, qm(, 5$............I', "g/,- ,,I, �,III.,,1,1'm 0 4, 100, z If N, M V 31 �3 A, �,05 5 ;7-AIf OV, A k AM, 'JAPP"I, k1D "R .......... 4 �Dll A, y- �j P jp- I IR j 'N' A a". K` "I"S, Mf % KA"', N, N Ifffffff vol -f gf ZIA-7, 7 s of A IN-3 ;Awl F "6 o ao, S/ y VF, 4, or 00 P to" Ag 14 SON,wo'b W/ % "'AP, Sa,p I1 I I'll I I "a 7'If", ,U, "d gt7:�9:J7 ZZOZ/OZ/B:PeAE!S E)je(]'PXLU'Os nPUE!-1 5uils!x3 C-Z ajnBi=j\sajnbi=1\sduw\ajupdnH3N-IS8M AaA\S13G!OJd\O-n's91u!OossV sobu-1 Aqdjnh qejoqe(]\xoqdoici\000jE!Bpe—aiup\sjesn\:o:qlud 9;epdn W3N ui co S3111113VA IVNOI.LV3H33H .LMOdHIV IVNOI.LVNH3.LNI cu J.S3M A3M GNV ALiNnwwoo F 7.�f 7di 1 51 M el, 0 co........... p >low", cz 0 =5 0 00 cf) >1 :3 C 0 C/) 0 =3 (1) C) U) (1) 0 2 0 0 C:) C13 C.) 0 Z LU > All cu (D LL (D �2 0 U)0 LU CD >LL >LL z >LL 0— LL 0, 0— LL LL C) o U) a)F- >% >% >s �e a 4-- a) (D M 0 E4— E c5 C) o (1) 2 a) C) T- 0- Of U) LL a- LL T- Ot tn itr I 0, 21 LL IM LL M a) LL EL If- a) U)0 r 0 L) CA X 2 0 L) M 3:21 a. a)0 (D 0 Alpl (D 0 CD (515 CL 0 0 0 2 t; M 0 0 a= >0 0 a 0 0 0 W'C :3,LL W.- U(D -0 E m M 0 LL P Illy, IL CD ON LL U LL 0 0 5.2 M WWW-- � — 0 IS M Z%0 VA N, 0 0 I'M VAd t7o:Zg:17 @jI?(]'PXW,s9!j!jpE!=l leuopuejoad puu Al!unwLuoo jr-Z 9jnBi=j\s9jnbi=l\sduw\9jupdn H3N-ls8M AeA\sT3G!OJd\O-n's9lI?!00ssV s0bu-1 Aqdjnh qejoqe(]\xoqdoici\000'jE!Bpe—alup\sjesn\:o:qlud 9;epdn W3N ui S3ounOS311 ivunJL:)311H:)HV Lq IHOdHIV IVNOIIVNH31NI cu IS3M A3M (INV IVOIIIOISIH 11-f- g 0 4/,"XMI! .......... ,o EE 0- 0 >C') E2 C= 00 a) �a o —a) 4 ......... 00 if AM W, >1 cu -0 -0 m C: _0 M 00 U) o !g �t 0 U)0 Lm 4-- Li 0 co 0 U) -2 2E LO Elf cli C5 U)Lf) (Z C In CQ CY) z LLI LU LLI a- a- C a) > w 01- z z (D r' CO LO z (a) (3) U) 0 0 + U) o o a- o iR uj o o c ui VAd 8[:80:9 ZZOZ/6�M:P@AUS @IU(]'PXW'SGDJ nose H lui njoaj!qojV PUE!I EOPOISH 9-Z @Jn Bi=l\sej nbi=l\sde Lu\alepdn H3 N 158M AaA\ST3G!OJd\O-n's@lu!OOSSV s0bu-1 Aqdjn q ejoqe(]\xoqdoic]\000jE!Bpe—alup\sjesn\:0:qJud a;epdfl W3N d�/W 3 � Q N�1 � �co S 121Od211d IVNO11VNM31N1cu 1S3M A3M 321nina 1S3M A3M :10 AII3 of I f � I� ' `wwr".rHi,inuwirwmstiu�u ydi4Vr, '^. y I + u V) *01 w� �Lfii yT� j U71{�� r A F o i C/) �r W O L ' LU l 00M v! U �1 c Z L U LO z LO J l r III N LL rp D V I d' J O C0 N rr, lu N LO u., O ' O CL � ti W. 1 0 � O pyry 2 .5 a) Of E ELO Q E in L1 U w n m w V a) E u u r_ 0 C r— - 'r:. O r— � m O O O O (n cu Z O Wd 9b ll 8 ZZOZ/9l/8:Paneg aleQ'pxw'asN pueq aanlnd lsoM Ra>{jo Rlid g-Z aan6i3\sainbid\sdew\alepdN W3N 158M Rai{\sloafoJd\Q-n'salu!OOssy s06eq Agdin"geaogad\xogdoad\oo0'ae6pa aiup\saasN\Q filed DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2.5 LAND USE CONTROLS Land use planning and the adoption,administration, and enforcement of zoning regulations are an exclusive authority of Florida's local governments within each of their jurisdictions. This includes authority for airport- compatible land use planning. The FAA does not have the authority to exercise land use control in a local government's jurisdiction. Airport-compatible land uses are defined as those uses that can coexist with a nearby airport without either constraining the safe and efficient operation of the airport or exposing people living or working nearby to unacceptable levels of noise or hazards (Transportation Research Board, Airport Cooperative Research Program, Report 27, Enhancing Airport Land Use Compatibility, Vol. 1, pg. 1.4). Airport zoning regulations are intended to protect people on the ground and in the air. Noncompatible land uses around airports can adversely affect public safety and safe airport operations. The responsibility for protecting airports from noncompatible uses is shared between federal, state,and local governments. Each level of government has different regulatory and enforcement power: The federal government primarily has an advisory role, the state has a regulatory role, and the local government has an enforcement role. While the federal government may encourage certain land use restrictions, they ultimately do not have the power to enforce land use regulations. Florida state law grants such regulatory power to local governments. Therefore, it is critical that the federal government, state government, and local governments work together to promote compatible land uses near airports. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prepared the 2020 Airport Airspace and Land Use Guidebook to provide local government planners with the information necessary to adopt airport zoning regulations compliant with state law and federal regulations. According to the Florida Department of Transportation's 2020 Airport Airspace and Land Use Guidebook (page 7), the two main documents that provide guidance regarding compatible land uses near airports in Florida are: 1. Title 14 CFR, Aeronautics and Space, part 77, Safe, Efficient Use, and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace(part 77) 2. Title XXV, Aviation, Chapter 333, Airport Zoning, Florida Statutes (Chapter 333, FS). The FAA also provides guidance on compatible land use specifically related to aircraft noise in part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Appendix A, Table 1 as well as in Advisory Circular 150/5050-6, Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning. The Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) primary guidance for the preservation and protection of national navigable airspace is part 77. Part 77, Subpart C establishes a series of "imaginary surfaces" around the runways at every airport. The primary function of these imaginary surfaces is to regulate obstructions to the navigable airspace surrounding airports. In addition to promoting compatible land use through parts 77 and 150, the FAA also facilitates compatible uses and development by requiring airports to agree to special conditions when they accept FAA funding to complete projects such as runway extensions, navigational aids installations, and terminal improvements. These conditions are called grant assurances. Some grant assurances specifically relate to compatible land use issues, including obstructions and hazards to airport navigation, airport noise, wildlife Page 19 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION and bird hazard attractants, and protection of persons and property on the ground. The State of Florida has the authority to implement laws and rules for the operation and regulation of its airports. Florida accomplishes this through Chapter 333, FS, which establishes zoning requirements for each municipality that has an airport hazard area within its jurisdiction. Chapter 333, FS, was amended in 2016(effective July 1) 2016)and details how comprehensive plan policies or a zoning ordinance must address the state's airport zoning regulations. The local governmental authority is responsible for adopting, administering, and enforcing airport zoning regulations as mandated by state law. Effective coordination between local government officials and airport sponsors is vital to properly codify, implement, and enforce airport zoning regulations required by Chapter 3337 FS. Local enforcement of land use requirements is exercised through two primary sources: 1. Comprehensive Plan 2. Zoning Ordinances There are multiple elements in a comprehensive plan required by Title XI, County Organizations and Intergovernmental Relations, Section 163.3177, FS. Airports are most frequently included and addressed in one or more of the following elements: • Transportation element (Plans for port, aviation, and related facilities coordinated with the general circulation and transportation element.) • Future land use element (The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in § 330.35 and consistent with § 333.02.) • Intergovernmental coordination element • Capital improvements element. At the option of a local government, an airport master plan, and any subsequent amendments to the airport master plan, prepared by a licensed publicly owned and operated airport under § 333.06 may be incorporated into the local government comprehensive plan by the local government having jurisdiction under this act for the area in which the airport or projected airport development is located by the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment. In the amendment to the local comprehensive plan that integrates the airport master plan,the comprehensive plan amendment shall address land use compatibility consistent with chapter 333 regarding airport zoning; the provision of regional transportation facilities for the efficient use and operation of the transportation system and airport; consistency with the local government transportation circulation element and applicable Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) long-range transportation plans;the execution of any necessary interlocal agreements for the purposes of the provision of public facilities and services to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards for facilities subject to concurrency; and may address airport-related or aviation-related development. Development or expansion of an airport consistent with the adopted airport master plan that has been incorporated into the local comprehensive plan in compliance with this part, and airport-related or aviation-related development that has been addressed in the comprehensive plan amendment that incorporates the airport master plan, do not constitute a development of regional impact. Notwithstanding any other general law, an airport that has received a development-of-regional-impact development order pursuant to s. 380.06, but which is no longer required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review pursuant to this subsection, may rescind its development-of-regional-impact order upon written notification to the applicable local government. Upon Page 20 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION receipt by the local government, the development-of-regional-impact development order shall be deemed rescinded. (§ 163.3177 FS, Subsection (6) (b)which addresses the transportation element, #4.) Airport zoning regulations must address the: • Permitting process for obstructions (pursuant to § 333.03 (1)(c)l.-5.) • Prohibition of landfills near airports (pursuant to § 333.03 (2)(a) and (b)) • Prohibition of certain land uses within noise contours surrounding airports (pursuant to § 333.03 (2)(c)) • Prohibition of certain land uses within runway protections zones (RPZs) (pursuant to § 333.03 (2)(e)) • Adoption of either an interlocal agreement or a joint airport protection zoning board with neighboring communities (pursuant to § 333.03 (1)(b)). Existing comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances for the City of Key West and Monroe County have been reviewed to determine if either or both of these documents address airport zoning and land use requirements and if they meet the current state and federal requirements. 2.5.1 City of Key West The City of Key West's Code of Ordinances was adopted by the City Commission on May 21, 20021 by Ordinance 02-14 and became effective June 10,2002.Since that time, 80 supplements have been adopted. This Code constitutes a recodification of the land development, general and permanent ordinances of the City of Key West, Florida. Subpart B, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 122, Zoning, Article IV, Districts, Division 14, Airport District (A), § 122-1046, Intent, (a) states, "The purpose and intent of the Airport District (A) is to provide a management framework for implementing comprehensive plan policies for the Key West International Airport which is designated "A" on the future land use map. All development proposed for Airport District (A) shall comply with the comprehensive plan and performance criteria in chapters 94, 102 and 106; articles I and III through IX of chapter 108; and chapters 110 and 114, as well as other applicable land development regulations." The Future Land Use Map for the City of Key West is shown on Figure 2.6. EYW is shown as Public Service, while most of the adjacent land within the airport boundary is shown as conservation. Airspace protection and compatible land use for public safety are addressed in Subpart B, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 122, Zoning, Article V, Supplementary District Regulations, Division 9, Airport Restrictions. § 122-1436, Height Limitations, states, "No structure shall be erected within the approach zones of an active runway on the Key West International Airport with a height in excess of those permitted by the Federal Aviation Administration or by the city commission. All structures shall comply with the city comprehensive plan and this division." § 122-1438 delineates airport zones and height limitations. § 122-1439 delineates airport land use restrictions. The City of Key West's Adopted Comprehensive Plan is codified through Ordinance No. 19-38, enacted December 3, 2019. The City's Comprehensive Plan addresses airports in Chapter 1: Future Land Use Element, §1-1: Future Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies, Policy 1-1.1.13: - Airport Land Use Designation, which states: The City shall continue to enforce performance criteria which require that land Page 21 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION use changes adjacent to the Key West International Airport do not encroach on to the airport hazard zone. Furthermore, land uses proposed within noise impact areas defined in the FAA noise control regulations shall comply with FAA guidelines for managing noise impacts through land use regulation. The ity's Land Development Regulations shall continue to establish the permitted uses and applicable restrictions within the air operations area. It appears that the City's Code of Ordinances does not include the following components as required by § 333.03 FS, Requirement to adopt airport zoning regulations: • Requirement for a permit for the construction or alteration of any structure which may affect navigable airspace • Requirement that each person applying for a permit for the construction or alteration of any structure which may affect navigable airspace must provide documentation they have filed a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) with the FAA and received a valid aeronautical study from the FAA • Requirement for consideration of the criteria in s. § 333.025 (6), when determining whether to issue or deny a permit • Requirement that the approval of a permit not be based solely on the determination by the FAA that the proposed structure is not an airport hazard • Regulations must, at a minimum, address the prohibition of new landfills and the restriction of existing landfills within the specified areas • Prohibition of noncompatible land uses within the noise contours established by the 14 CFR part 150 study for Key West International Airport • Restriction of new noncompatible uses, activities, or substantial modifications to existing noncompatible uses within Runway Protection Zones. 2.5.2 County of Monroe The Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, revised and restated in its entirety, was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 13, 2016, by Ordinance 005-2016, and became effective on June 20, 2016. Since that time, six Supplements have been adopted. The Policy document states, "Monroe County shall provide aviation facilities in a manner that maximizes safety, convenience, economic benefit, environmental compatibility and consistency with other elements of the comprehensive plan, including exercising its planning and land use authorities on County-owned airport properties within incorporated areas of the County" (Goal 501). "Airports and airstrips shall operate in the manner to maximize safety and least adverse impact on the community." (Objective 501.3) Airspace protection is addressed in Policies 501.1.2, 501.1.3, and 501.1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan. "Monroe County shall continue to prohibit structures and activities that interfere with the operation of aircraft at airports and airstrips whether public or private. Such structures and activities include but are not limited to tall structures, smoke, tall trees, and electromagnetic radiation." "Monroe County shall consider adopting an ordinance regulating incompatible uses such as the operation of ultralights, balloons, parachutes, kites, banner towing, model airplanes and similar activities within the proximity of the public airports or private Page 22 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION airstrips to the extent legally possible."The EYW Airspace Plan is incorporated by reference and shown on Figure 6-2 in the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Technical Document dated May 2011. Airport noise compatible land use is addressed in Policy 501.3.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, and states "Monroe County shall maintain and update the Key West International and Marathon Noise Exposure Maps and implement measures to minimize the adverse impacts of noise on the surrounding community." Public safety compatible land use is addressed in Policies 501.1.1 and 501.1.4 of the Comprehensive Plan. "Monroe County shall maintain aviation related land uses adjacent to the public airports and additionally prohibit intrusion into all airport zones." "Monroe County shall continue to include existing airports and airstrips in airport land use districts that only permit airport related land uses including those the County owns and operates within incorporated areas of the County." The Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan addresses intergovernmental coordination in Policy 1301.1.5. "Monroe County shall coordinate with the Community Services, Public Works and Planning offices of each municipality within Monroe County regarding the following fourteen topics: 1. Land Use/Development Impact Review 2. Transportation Management 3. Affordable Housing 4. Public Facilities 5. Public Safety 6. Solid Waste (to include recycling) 7. Recreation and Open Space 8. Potable Water 9. Drainage 10. Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge 11. Conservation 12. Coastal Management 13. Permit Allocation 14. Hurricane Evacuation and Recovery." The Monroe County Code of Ordinances, Supplement 23 Update 3, codified through Ordinance No. 018- 2021, was adopted June 16, 2021. Airspace protection is addressed in Chapter 130, Land Use Districts, § 130-75, Airport District(AD), §§ 130-75 (d),Airport Height Overlay Zones and Restrictions. Based on a review of the County's Code of Ordinances, it appears that the following components as required by§ 333.03 FS, Requirement to adopt airport zoning regulations, are not included: • Requirement for a permit for the construction or alteration of any structure which may affect navigable airspace; • Requirement that each person applying for a permit for the construction or alteration of any structure which may affect navigable airspace must provide documentation they have filed a Page 23 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) with the FAA and received a valid aeronautical study from the FAA; • Requirement for consideration of the criteria in § 333.025 (6), when determining whether to issue or deny a permit • Requirement that the approval of a permit not be based solely on the determination by the FAA that the proposed structure is not an airport hazard • Regulations must, at a minimum, address the prohibition of new landfills and the restriction of existing landfills within the specified areas • Prohibition of noncompatible land uses within the noise contours established by the 14 CFR part 150 study for Key West International Airport • Restriction of new noncompatible uses, activities, or substantial modifications to existing noncompatible uses within Runway Protection Zones. 2.6 LAND USE COMPA T/B/L/TY GUIDELINES The FAA has guidelines regarding the compatibility of land uses with various DNL contour ranges(e.g., 65- 70) 70-757 75+). These guidelines are included in Title 14 CFR, Aeronautics and Space, part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Appendix A, Table 1 (part 150 Table 1) and are shown in Table 2-2. Currently, neither the City of Key West nor Monroe County have adopted stricter land use compatibility guidelines than those provided for in the part 150 regulations; therefore, the determination of compatible / incompatible land uses in the NEMs will be based on the part 150 Table 1 guidelines. As Table 2.2 indicates, all land uses are considered compatible with noise levels of less than DNL 65 dB. Noise-sensitive land uses, such as residences and schools,are considered noncompatible with noise levels of DNL 65 dB or greater unless otherwise determined by local guidelines. Where the community determines that residential or school uses must be allowed at DNL levels greater than 65 dB, acoustical treatments designed to achieve indoor levels of 45 dB or less should be incorporated into the structures. Other noise- sensitive land uses, such as churches, hospitals, and nursing homes, are considered generally compatible with noise levels of DNL 65 to 70 dB, provided that their structure is designed with, or contains, adequate measures to achieve reduction in noise levels (i.e., soundproofing). Land uses that are less sensitive to noise, such as office buildings, are considered compatible with noise levels of DNL 65 without sound insulation and up to DNL 75 dB with sound insulation. The part 150 definition of noise-sensitive public buildings includes schools, hospitals. and health care facilities. Properties listed in, or eligible to be listed in, the NRHP are also considered noise sensitive. Page 24 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2.2 TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES YEARLY DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVEL DNL IN DECIBELS BELOW 65-70 70-75 75-80 85-90 OVER 65 85 Residential Residential (Other than mobile homes & Y N' N' N N N transient lodges) Mobile Home Parks Y N N N N N Transient Lodging Y N' N' N' N N Public Use Schools Y N' N' N N N Hospitals, Nursing Homes Y 25 30 N N N Churches, Auditoriums, Concert Halls Y 25 30 N N N Governmental Services Y Y 25 30 N N Transportation Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 Y4 Parking Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N Commercial Use Offices, Business & Professional Y Y 25 30 N N Wholesale & Retail Building Mtls, Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N Hardware & Farm Equipment Retail Trade- General Y Y 25 30 N N Utilities Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N Communications Y Y 25 30 N N Manufacturing & Production Manufacturing, General Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N Photographic and Optical Y Y 25 30 N N Agriculture (Except Livestock) & Y Y6 Y' Y$ Y8 Y$ Forestry Livestock Farming & Breeding Y Y6 Y' N N N Mining & Fishing, Resource Production Y Y Y Y Y Y & Extraction Recreational Outdoor Sports Arenas, Spectator Y Y5 Y5 N N N Sports Outdoor Music Shells, Amphitheaters Y N N N N N Nature Exhibits &Zoos Y Y N N N N Amusement, Parks, Resorts, Camps Y Y Y N N N Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Y Y 25 30 N N LRecreation Source:Title 14 CFR,Aeronautics and Space, part 150,Airport Noise Compatibility Planning,Appendix A,Table 1 NOTE:The designations contained in this table do not constitute a Federal determination that any use of land covered by the program is acceptable or unacceptable under Federal, State or Local law. The responsibility for determining the acceptable and permissible land use remains with the local authorities. FAA determinations under part 150 are not intended to substitute federally determined land use for those determined to be appropriate by local authorities in response to locally determined needs and values in achieving noise-compatible land uses. Page 25 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED) TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES KEY TO TABLE: SLUCM Standard Land Use Coding Manual. Y(Yes) Land Use and related structures compatible without restrictions. N (No) Land Use and related structures are not compatible and should be prohibited. NLR Noise Level Reduction (outdoor to indoor)to be achieved through incorporation of noise attenuation into design and construction of the structure. 25, 30 or 35 Land use and related structures generally compatible; measures to achieve NLR of 25,30 or 35 must be incorporated in design and construction of structure. 1 Where the community determines that residential or school uses must be allowed, measures to achieve outdoor to indoor NLR of at least 25 dB and 30 dB should be incorporated into building codes and be considered in individual approvals. Normal construction can be expected to provide a NLR of 20 dB, thus, the reduction requirements are often stated as 5, 10 or 15 dB over standard construction and normally assumes mechanical ventilation and closed windows year-round. However, the use of NLR criteria will not eliminate outdoor noise problems. 2 Measures to achieve NLR of 25 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of the buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise-sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low. 3 Measures to achieve NLR of 30 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of the buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise-sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low. 4 Measures to achieve NLR of 35 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of the buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise-sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low. 5 Land use compatible provided special sound reinforcement systems are installed. 6 Residential buildings require a NLR of 25. 7 Residential buildings require a NLR of 30. 8 Residential buildings not permitted. 0 Noncompatible land uses Page 26 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION SECTION 4 EXISTING CONDITION: YEAR 2021 NOISE EXPOSURE 4.1 INTRODUCTION The evaluation of the airport noise environment at the Key West International Airport(EYW)was completed using the methodologies and standards developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and published in Title 14 CFR part 150 (Part 150). The regulation requires that the cumulative noise energy exposure of individuals to noise resulting from aviation activities be established in terms of yearly day/night average sound level (DNL) as the FAA's primary metric. All detailed noise analyses must be performed using the most current version of the FAA's Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT). For this NEM, the FAA's AEDT Version 3d was used to model aircraft noise exposure. User- defined information required to run the AEDT model includes: • A physical description of the airport layout, including location, length and orientation of all runways, and airport elevation; • The aircraft fleet mix for the average day; • The number of daytime flight and run-up operations (7:00 a.m. to 9:59 p.m.); • The number of nighttime flight and run-up operations (10:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m.); • Aircraft departure stage lengths; • Runway utilization rates; • Primary departure and arrival flight tracks; and • Flight track utilization rates. The noise analysis described in the section was conducted to reflect the existing (i.e., current) condition. This analysis includes maps depicting land uses within the DNL contours. The following information is provided for the existing conditions: • The number of people living or residences within each noise contour above DNL 65 dB for the Existing Condition NEM. • The location and number of noise sensitive uses (e.g., schools, places of worship, hospitals, parks, recreation areas) exposed to DNL 65 dB or greater for the Existing Condition NEM. • Mitigation measures in effect or proposed and their relationship to the Existing Condition NEM. 4.2 METHOD FOR DEVELOPING FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS 4.2.1 Data Sources Historical aircraft operations data were obtained from Flightradar24 (FR24), FAA's Operations Network (OPSNET), and FAA's Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS), and EYW Landing Reports for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. The sources of the detailed fleet mix data used in this analysis were FR24, TFMS, and EYW Landing Reports, because OPSNET only provides total operations Page 42 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION by aircraft category. Documentation of the consultation with the FAA regarding the method for developing the fleet mix and number of operations is included in Appendix C, Section C.4. 4.2.1.1 FlightRadar24 The primary technology that FR24 uses to receive flight information is called automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B). The ground-based ADS-B receivers collect data from any aircraft in their local area that are equipped with an ADS-B transponder and feed this data to the internet in real time. The aircraft-based transponders use the GPS and other flight data input to transmit signals containing aircraft registration, position, altitude, velocity and other flight data. For security and privacy reasons information about some aircraft is limited or blocked. This includes most military aircraft and certain high-profile aircraft, like Air Force One. (J. Andersson, personal communication, December 7, 2020) The FAA published Federal Regulation 14 CFR 91.225 and 14 CFR 91.227 in May 2010. The final rule dictates that effective January 1, 2020, aircraft operating in airspace defined in §91.225 are required to have an Automatic Dependent Surveillance— Broadcast (ADS-B) system that includes a certified position source capable of meeting requirements defined in§91.227. These regulations set a minimum performance standard for both the ADS-B transmitter and the position sources integrated with the ADS-B equipment. 4.2.1.2 OPSNET The OPSNET is the official source of FAA National Airspace System air traffic operations data. The data is reported to OPSNET by the Airport Traffic Control Tower(ATCT) personnel and can be viewed on the FAA Operations& Performance Data website. The OPSNET separates operations into Itinerant and Local. Itinerant operations are separated into four categories: Air Carrier, Air Taxi, General Aviation, and Military. Local operations are separated into two categories: Civil and Military. OPSNET only provides total operations by aircraft category. Definitions of these categories are as follows: • Air Carrier. (AC) Aircraft with seating capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pounds, carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. This includes US and foreign-flagged carriers. • Air Taxi. (AT)Aircraft designed to have a maximum seating capacity of 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of 18,000 pounds, carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. • Civil. Operations by all classes of private and commercial takeoffs and landings at FAA and Federal Contract Tower(FCT)facilities. • General Aviation. (GA) Takeoffs and landings of all civil aircraft, except for air carriers or air taxis. • Itinerant. Operations performed by an aircraft, either Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) or Visual Flight Rules (VFR), that land at an airport arriving from outside the airport area or depart from an airport and leave the airport area. • Local. Operations performed by an aircraft that remain in the local traffic pattern, execute simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport, and operations to or from the same airport within a designated practice area within a 20-miles radius of the tower. Page 43 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION • Military. (MIL) Operations by all classes of military takeoffs and landings at FAA and FCT facilities. Following consultation with the ATCT manager at EYW, it has been confirmed that OPSNET "Airport Operations" are just the aircraft that land and takeoff from EYW and the OPSNET "Tower Operations" contain the military overflights that fly through EYW airspace. 4.2.1.3 TFMSC Traffic Flow Management System Counts (TFMSC) include aircraft that fly under IFR and are captured by the FAA's enroute computers.TFMSC groups flights into three user groups: Commercial, General Aviation, and Military. These three groups were chosen because of the slightly different user classes used by TFMS and OPSNET. Most VFR and some non-enroute IFR traffic are excluded. TFMSC source data are created when pilots file flight plans and/or when flights are detected by the National Airspace System, usually via radar. The flight counts reported in TFMSC are derived from flight records assembled by the FAA National Airspace System Data Warehouse by threading the many TFMS messages together. These flight records may be incomplete records when one end is missing, or when only planned components are available. Due to limited radar coverage and incomplete messaging, TFMSC may exclude certain flights that do not enter the enroute airspace and other low-altitude flights. 4.2.1.4 EYW Landing Reports EYW tracks aircraft landings for passenger and cargo airlines for the purpose of collecting landing fees and statistical data. The airlines submit monthly reports to the airport that detail the number of each aircraft type that landed at the airport during the month. Landing Fees are collected from: Delta Airlines (including Endeavor, Republic, Express Jet), American Airlines (including American Eagle, Republic, and Envoy), Allegiant Air, United Airlines (including United Express, Republic, and Express Jet), JetBlue Airways, Silver Airways, Ameriflight, Mountain Air Cargo, and Martinaire Aviation. (M. J. Morgan, personal communication, January 18, 2022) 4.2.2 Existing Condition Fleet Mix Fleet mix for the Existing Condition were developed from the FR24 and EYW Landing Reports for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. The fixed-wing fleet mix was divided into five categories: AC/AT JET, AC/AT PROP, GA JET, GA PROP, and MIL. In this categorization, the term "Jet" includes aircraft with turbojet or turbofan engines. The term "Prop" includes aircraft where the main source of thrust is a propeller. In addition to the fixed-wing fleet mix, helicopter operations were also included as a separate category, HELO. These categories were selected primarily for flight track development and utilization. 4.2.2.1 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Jet Regularly scheduled air carrier / air taxi jet (AC/AT JET) passenger aircraft operations at EYW include Airbus A319, Embraer EMB-145, EMB-170, EMB-175 and EMB-190 aircraft. Current AC/AT JET operators include Delta Airlines, American Airlines, American Eagle, Allegiant Air, United Express, and JetBlue Airways. The top destinations for AC/AT JET aircraft flights from EYW include Atlanta (ATL), Miami (MIA), Charlotte (CLT), Chicago (ORD), Newark(EWR), Washington DC (IAD), and Dallas (DFW). Page 44 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION During the Ad-Hoc Committee meeting on March 7, 2022, there was a discussion regarding Delta's use of a CRJ (instead of an A319), during Eastern Standard Time, for their last arrival of the day. Subsequently it was determined via consultation with Delta Airlines that this did not occur between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. 4.2.2.2 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Prop Air carrier/ air taxi prop (AC/AT PROP) passenger and cargo aircraft operations at EYW include ATR42, ATR72, Beech King Air, Cessna 208, De Havilland Canada Dash 8, De Havilland Twin Otter, Fairchild Swearingen SA26-AT Merlin, Saab 340, and Shorts 330. Current AC/AT PROP operators include, but are not limited to, Silver Airways, Ameriflight, and Mountain Air Cargo. The top destinations for AC/AT PROP aircraft flights from EYW include Tampa (TPA), Orlando (MCO and ORL), Ft. Lauderdale (FLL and FXE), Miami (MIA, OPF, and TMB), Boca Raton (BCT), Fort Myers (FMY), Naples (APF), Palm Beach (PBI), and Kissimmee (ISM). 4.2.2.3 General Aviation Jet General aviation jet (GA JET) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant turbojet aircraft. Common GA JET aircraft operations at EYW include Bombardier Challenger, Cessna Citation, Dassault Falcon, Gulfstreams, and Learjets. 4.4.2.4 General Aviation Prop General aviation prop (GA PROP) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant aircraft, including lightweight single-and multi-engine(piston), and turboprop aircraft. Common GA PROP aircraft operations at EYW include Beech, Cessna, Cirrus, Mooney, Partenavia, and Piper. 4.2.2.5 Military Military (MIL) aircraft operations consist of fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters that are operated by any armed service or the federal government. Military aircraft can be either combat or non-combat. Common fixed-wing MIL aircraft operations at EYW include Beechcraft C-12 Huron, Boeing 737, Boeing P-8 Poseidon, EADS CASA HC-144 Ocean Sentry, Cessna Citation UH-35A, Lockheed-Martin C-130 Hercules, and Northrop T-38 Falcon. Common MIL helicopter operations at EYW include Bell TH-57 Sea Ranger, Eurocopter UH-72A Lakota, Hughes MH-6 Little Bird, Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk, Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk, and Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion. 4.2.2.6 Helicopters Helicopter (HELO) aircraft operations consist of local government-, private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant rotorcraft, in which lift and thrust are supplied by horizontally spinning rotors, which allows the aircraft to take off and land vertically, to hover, and to fly forward, backward and laterally. Helicopters do not takeoff or land on the airport's runways, but rather from the nonmovement area of the Fixed Base Operator. Common HELO aircraft operations at EYW include Aerospatiale AS-366, Eurocopter/Airbus H- 130, Bell 206, Hughes 500, Robinson R-44, and Sikorsky S-76. Page 45 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4.2.3 Existing Condition Number of Operations Since the OPSNET represents FAA's official count of air traffic operations data, it was determined that the number of operations by category should match the OPSNET for modeling purposes. Aircraft operational levels for the 2022 Existing Condition were based on the FAA's OPSNET for the period October 1, 2020) through September 30, 2021. FR24 and EYW Landing Reports for the same period were reviewed as supplementary sources. A summary of the three data sources is shown in Table 4.1. TABLE 4.1 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS BY CATEGORY SOURCE AIR AIR GENERAL MILITARY TOTAL CARRIER TAXI AVIATION FAA OPSNET 21,563 61593 35,533 439 641128 FLIGHT 19,742 6,370 33,230 406 59,748 RADAR 24 EYW LANDING 19,456 31142 NA NA NA REPORTS Sources: OPSNET,2021, FlightRadar24,2022, EYW Landing Reports,2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 4.2.4 Existing Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations Fleet mix defines the various types of aircraft and allows development of very specific input data, such as engine type, title 14 CFR part 36 Noise Stage Certification, gross weight, and departure stage length. The Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) is a software system that is designed to model aviation related operations in space and time to compute noise, emissions, and fuel consumption. The AEDT is currently the FAA's standard tool for producing noise contours and analyzing noise levels at sensitive sites. The AEDT aircraft database contains actual noise and performance data for numerous types of aircraft. Although the AEDT aircraft database provides a large selection of aircraft to model, it does not contain every known aircraft. For this reason, the FAA has developed an official aircraft substitution list which allows the modeler to substitute similar aircraft when necessary for modeling purposes. These substitutions represent a very close estimate of the noise produced by the actual aircraft. To develop the proposed number of operations for the fleet mix, the percentage of operations for each aircraft in each category was calculated from the FR24 data (Step 1). This percentage by aircraft type was then applied to the total number of operations by category from the OPSNET data (Step 2). Table 4.2 is the resulting fleet mix and number of flight operations by AEDT Aircraft Type. Page 46 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.2 FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS AEDT GENERAL AVIATION MILITARY AIRCRAFT AC/AT AC/AT GRAND JET PROP GA JET GA GA HELO MIL MIL TOTAL TYPE PROP HELO EMB175 91656 91656 A319-131 710242 7.4242 E M B 170 31401 31401 EMB190 917 917 737700 238 238 EMB145 103 103 CRJ9-ER 7 7 DHC8 3,096 3,096 DHC6 11817 1,817 C NA208 11299 11299 SD330 202 202 SF340 142 142 D H C830 37 37 LEAR35 11424 1,424 CNA510 11314 11314 CNA500 948 948 CNA560XL 916 916 CNA680 877 877 CL600 736 736 CNA560U 583 583 CNA55B 503 503 FAL900EX 503 503 CNA750 433 433 CNA560E 416 416 GV 282 282 GIV 255 255 IA1125 198 198 M U 3001 183 183 ECLIPSE500 165 165 C525C 129 129 CIT3 103 103 CNA525C 102 102 BD-700-1A10 77 77 G11B 11 11 LEAR25 2 2 Page 47 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.2 (CONTINUED) FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS AEDT GENERAL AVIATION MILITARY Al RCRAFT AC/AT AC/AT GRAND JET PROP GA JET GA GA HELO MIL MIL TOTAL TYPE PROP HELO GASEPV 71986 71986 CNA182 611699 6,699 BEC58P 21587 21587 CNA208 11247 11247 PA30 11247 11247 DHC6 931 931 CNA441 312 312 DHC-2FLT 239 239 CNA206 133 133 PA42 112 112 GASEPF 135 135 D0328 27 27 D H C830 11 11 DO 4 4 1900D 4 4 DHC8 1 1 S76 11764 11764 R44 11468 11468 SA355F 186 186 B206 142 142 EC130 114 114 M D 600 N 14 14 B212 3 3 A 109 3 3 B429 2 2 C130E 115 115 T-38A 70 70 DHC6 40 40 SF340 34 34 F5E 27 27 C 17 19 19 C560 13 13 B350 11 11 F15E20 7 7 GASEPV 4 4 Page 48 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.2 (CONTINUED) FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF ANNUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS AEDT GENERAL AVIATION MILITARY AIRCRAFT AC/AT AC/AT GRAND JET PROP GA JET GA GA HELO MIL MIL TOTAL TYPE PROP HELO DHC8 2 2 F18AF 2 2 GV 2 2 KC135R 2 2 DO 1 1 LEAR35 1 1 S70 55 55 S65 31 31 B212 1 1 Grand Total 21,563 61593 10,161 21,674 31698 351 87 641128 Sources: OPSNET, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 4.2.5 Time of Day The time of day that aircraft operations occur is a very important factor in the calculation of cumulative noise exposure. The DNL treats nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m.) noise differently from daytime (7:00 a.m. to 9:59 p.m.) noise. In the calculation of DNL, each operation at night is multiplied by 10, which effectively adds 10 dB to the A-weighted levels of each nighttime operation. This weighting factor is applied to account for people's greater sensitivity to nighttime noise. In addition, events during the night are often more intrusive because the ambient sound levels during this time are usually lower than daytime ambient sound levels. FlightRadar24 data was used to ascertain time of day. The daytime vs. nighttime distribution for the Existing Condition is shown in Table 4.3. TABLE 4.3 DAYTIME VS. NIGHTTIME DISTRIBUTION AIRCRAFT DEPARTURES ARRIVALS CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME ARRIVALS AC/AT JET 96% 4% 89% 11% AC/AT PROP 97% 3% 98% 2% GA JET 96% 4% 97% 3% GA PROP 95% 5% 97% 3% GA HELO 68% 322022% 81% 19% MIL 98% 2% 93% 7% MIL HELO 88% 12% 57% 43% OVERALL 95% 5% 93% 7% Source: FlightRadar24, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Page 49 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4.2.6 Departure Profiles and Stage Length The AEDT database contains several departure profiles for each fixed-wing aircraft type representing the varying performance characteristics for that aircraft at a particular takeoff weight. Use of appropriate departure profiles is an important component of calculating DNL noise exposure contours. Historically, it has been easier to obtain trip length data than average weight data, so the AEDT uses "departure stage length" of a given flight to determine the departure weight and associated departure profile. Departure stage length is the distance between the departure airport and the destination airport. As the departure stage length increases, the aircraft's required fuel load and takeoff weight also increase. The increase in takeoff weight equates to a decrease in aircraft takeoff and climb performance. A decrease in aircraft performance results in a longer takeoff departure roll and decreased climb rates. These performance characteristics produce increased noise exposure impacts. The aircraft's noise impacts are greater because the aircraft is producing noise closer to the ground longer. The departure stage lengths are defined in Table 4.4. FlightRadar24 data was used to establish stage length. Stage length distribution by aircraft category is shown in Table 4.5. During the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on June 1, 2021,the EYW ATCT manager explained the interaction between EYW ATC and Naval Air Station Key West (NAS KW)ATC. He stated that a restriction is placed on aircraft departing on EYW Runway 09 regarding the aircraft's climb profile. A 2,000-ft hold down on the initial altitude for instrument departures was instituted by the previous ATC Officer at NAS KW. NAS KW ATC must separate all NAS KW air traffic from the route and altitude of the EYW departure as it quickly gets into NAS KW airspace immediately after taking off from EYW Runway 09. Once NAS KW ATC sees the aircraft departing EYW on their radar and establishes radio contact, NAS KW ATC will issue further climb instructions based on the traffic at that time. NAS KW ATC is authorized to give EYW ATC a higher initial altitude upon request if NAS KW has no conflicting traffic. Appendix D, Section D.5 includes the minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on June 1, 2021. A screening analysis was conducted to determine how often EYW departures on Runway 09 were held down, and whether this procedure should be modeled for the NEM Update. The Screening Analysis was documented in a letter to the FAA dated October 26, 2021, and is included in Appendix C, Section CA. A video conference was held on November 18, 2021, to discuss the results of the screening analysis and included participants from the FAA and the Consultant. It was concluded that standard profiles should be used to model all aircraft operations for the NEM Update as the hold-down occurs over water. The Record of Conversation is included in Appendix C, Section C.4. Page 50 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.4 STAGE LENGTH DEFINITIONS STAGE LENGTH DISTANCE (NM) 1 0-500 2 501-11000 3 13001-11500 4 11 501-2,500 5 21 501-3,500 6 3,501-4,500 7 41 501-5,500 8 5501-6,500 9 > 6,500 Source: AEDT User Manual, 2021. TABLE 4.5 STAGE LENGTH DISTRIBUTION AIRCRAFT STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE CATEGORY LENGTH 1 LENGTH 2 LENGTH 3 LENGTH 4 LENGTH 5 AC/AT JET 15.6% 59.2% 25.1% 0.0% 0.0% AC/AT PROP 89.9% 9.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% GA 95.5% 4.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% GA JET 51.7% 33.2% 13.6% 1.5% 0.1% MIL 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates 4.2.7 Runway Utilization Runway utilization refers to the frequency with which aircraft utilize each runway during a year as dictated or permitted by wind, weather, aircraft weight, and noise considerations. The more often a runway is used throughout the year, the more noise is created in areas located off each end of that runway. Runway utilization for the Existing Condition was determined from the FR24 data for each aircraft category. The runway utilization for departures is shown in Table 4.6 and for arrivals in Table 4.7. Page 51 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.6 RUNWAY UTILIZATION - DEPARTURES AIRCRAFT RUNWAY 09 RUNWAY 27 CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME ARRIVALS AC/AT JET 88.7% 81.8% 11.3% 18.2% AC/AT PROP 87.2% 81.8% 12.8% 18.2% GA PROP 88.1% 87.2% 11.9% 12.8% GA JET 88.9% 94.1% 11.1% 5.9% MIL 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% OVERALL 88.4% 84.8% 11.6% 15.2% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates TABLE 4.7 RUNWAY UTILIZATION -ARRIVALS AIRCRAFT RUNWAY 09 RUNWAY 27 CATEGORY DAYTIME NIGHTTIME DAYTIME ARRIVALS AC/AT JET 85.2% 84.9% 14.8% 15.1% AC/AT PROP 87.1% 93.3% 12.9% 6.7% GA PROP 87.0% 82.4% 13.0% 17.6% GA JET 85.1% 82.4% 14.9% 17.6% MIL 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% OVERALL 85.9% 84.8% 14.1% 15.2% Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 4.2.8 Back Taxi Operations EYW has one runway, Runway 09/27, which is 5,075 feet long and 100 feet wide that includes 274 feet of pavement reclassified as runway pavement at the Runway 09 end in 2017. Although the western 274 feet of pavement is available for aircraft departures, the runway's parallel taxiway (Taxiway B) does not serve the end of the available pavement. Aircraft using the full departure length of Runway 09 must back taxi 274 feet to the runway end on the runway itself. FR24 data was analyzed to determine the percentage of aircraft, by aircraft category, departing on Runway 09 that back taxied to the Runway 09 end vs.the percentage that departed from the Taxiway B intersection. The back taxi distribution for departures on Runway 09 is shown in Table 4.8 for aircraft categories with greater than five percent use of the full runway length. Page 52 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.8 BACK TAXI DISTRIBUTION AIRCRAFT CATEGORY BACK TAXI TO USE FULL DEPART FROM TAXIWAY B RUNWAY LENGTH INTERSECTION AC/AT JET 32% 68% AC/AT PROP 44% 56% GA JET 8% 92% Sources: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates 4.2.9 Standing Takeoff Operations Because of the length of the runway at EYW, many of the air carrier and air taxi aircraft perform a standing takeoff. A standing takeoff is defined as one in which the aircraft's pilot comes to a complete stop at the departure end of the runway, applies the brakes, spools up the engine to takeoff power, then releases the brakes. Field observations were conducted from December 5t" to 9t"7 2021. A total of 81 departure operations on Runway 09 were logged for air carrier and air taxi aircraft. The noise modeling assumes a percentage of air carrier and air taxi aircraft will perform this operation prior to departure, as determined by the field observations. Each standing takeoff operation is being modeled in AEDT as a 15-second engine spool-up to takeoff power and brake release. Table 4.9 shows the details of the standing takeoff operations at the airport modeled for the Existing Condition NEM.Approximately 26 average daily standing takeoff operations were modeled TABLE 4.9 STANDING TAKEOFF OPERATIONS AEDT %OF RUNWAY ENGINE DURATION ANNUAL AVERAGE AIRCRAFT TOTAL OPS USE HEADING POWER (SECONDS) OPS DAILY 09/27 SETTING OPS 737700 68% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 20,400 lbs. 15.0 81 0.22 A319-131 80% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 18,700 lbs. 15.0 27897 7.94 CNA208 68% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 1,955 lbs. 15.0 442 0.01 CRJ 100% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 11,496 lbs. 15.0 4 1.69 DHC6 68% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 1,700 lbs. 15.0 618 1.70 DHC8 40% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 4,038 lbs. 15.0 619 1.21 EMB145 68% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 6,375 lbs. 15.0 35 0.10 EMB170 45% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 11,730 lbs. 15.0 765 2.10 EMB175 80% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 11,730 lbs. 15.0 3,862 10.58 EMB190 40% 88%/ 12% 900/2700 15,725 lbs. 15.0 183 0.50 TOTAL 71383 26.05 Sources: Field Observation, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022; AEDT, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Page 53 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4.2.10 Low Approach, Touch-and-Go, and Go-Around Operations Some general aviation and military aircraft perform a maneuver known as a touch-and-go (T&G) at EYW, primarily for pilot training. During a touch-and-go, the pilot makes an approach to landing, configures the plane to land, and briefly touches down on the runway. Rather than coming to a stop and taxiing off the runway as a pilot would with a normal landing, once the wheels touch down, the pilot continues down the runway, reconfigures the plane for takeoff and executes an immediate takeoff without ever coming to a stop. Table 4.10 shows the details of the T&G operations at the airport modeled for the Existing Condition NEM. Approximately 7 average daily T&G operations were modeled. TABLE 4.10 TOUCH-AND-GO OPERATIONS AEDT AIRCRAFT ANNUAL OPS AVERAGE DAILY OPS BEC58P 806 2.21 CNA182 782 2.14 GASPEV 781 2.14 C130E 83 0.23 TOTAL 21452 6.72 11 Source: FlightRadar24, 2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates Military aircraft occasionally conduct low approaches to the runway at EYW, without touching down at the airport. These are often training flights to practice landing approach to just above the runway. The military made the decision decades ago that it is safer to not perform touch and go landings in high performance jet aircraft, because every landing decreases the useful life of the tires, wheels and brakes, and actual touch and go landings introduce risks to the flight operation, including running off the end of the runway before getting airborne again. For this analysis, low approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). Aircraft occasionally must perform a go-around or missed approach at EYW. Generally, if a pilot determines by the time the aircraft is at the decision height (for a precision approach) or missed approach point (for a non-precision approach), that the runway or its environment is not in sight, or that a safe landing cannot be accomplished for any reason, the landing approach must be discontinued (a "go-around") and the missed approach procedure must be immediately initiated. It is also common for pilots to practice a missed approach as part of initial or recurrent instrument training. For this analysis, go-arounds and missed approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). 4.2.11 Flight Tracks and Flight Track Utilization The source of the historic flight positions data used in this analysis was FR24. FR24 receives the position of an aircraft directly from the aircraft's ADS-B or Mode-S transponder. The frequency of position updates recorded starts around every 5 seconds during periods of rapid change (i.e., take-off and landing) and increases to a maximum of 60 seconds during steady flight. It is important to recognize that the availability of aircraft positional data is strictly dependent on the level of transponder data being broadcast from a Page 54 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION particular aircraft. Aircraft that have their information restricted or blocked on Flightradar24.com will not have this information included in the historic data. The FR24 aircraft location data points were used to generate flight trajectories for each individual flight. FR24 aircraft flight trajectories were separated into six categories: AC/AT JET, AC/AT PROP, GA JET, GA PROP, T&G, and HELD. They were then further separated into East Flow (Runway 09) and West Flow (Runway 27). Touch-and-go operations on Runway 09 are in a right-hand pattern, with the downwind leg generally 1 to 1.5 miles abeam of the runway at approximately 800 feet elevation. Helicopter operations utilize the same tracks regardless of flow. AEDT modeled flight tracks were developed based on the FR24 aircraft flight trajectories in each category. Modeled flight tracks do not represent the precise paths flown by all aircraft utilizing EYW. Instead, they represent the primary flight corridors (i.e., the highest concentration of FR24 aircraft flight trajectories) for the aircraft using the airport. Flight track utilization was also developed from the concentration of FR24 aircraft flight trajectories. Figures 4.1 through 4.10 illustrate the FR24 flight trajectories and AEDT modeled flight tracks when the airport is operating in east flow and west flow, respectively. Flight track utilization is depicted on each graphic. Title 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Amendment No. 150-4, Section A150.103(b)(1), requires "A map of the airport and its environs at an adequately detailed scale (not less than 1 inch to 2,000 feet) indicating runway length, alignments, landing thresholds, takeoff start-of-roll points, airport boundary, and flight tracks out to at least 30,000 feet from the end of each runway." Therefore, flight track maps at a scale of 1 inch to 2,000 feet are provided in Appendix G. Page 55 cc 0 a, -AK Lu uJ Lu Lu z ui v�m M Lu Lu co Lu cn 0 Lu LL F- cqq F- C) LL 0 F= j LU Lu LL EE r,4 0 o F- LL U Lu LU rn Lu n j < M, LU Lu < Lu Lu N n'-lillim pjjjjjwjjjqjjjj��j Lu A (D u Lu 0 0 c- 0 C) z LL C:) Lu 0 F- r.4 u Cl) -1 Lu < r-i Ln < Lu (D U 0 LL LL 0 Lu FIGURE 4.1 Page 56 cc O '87r r ,,, r,,;,r� ✓,,rr rlUWa,.s ✓ Urr'j t 1,OINVruy1 x ,, a fi ar i +✓ r, r'W% ".,X N ;llk,r':'Y"�k' "y✓y.r 14�1� /N, %`(i �(SSyyl� 6tlYM1t��rrrx//ri r/'��7 '%�N)f'r' ", ':, �6:r✓ w��, r'%,)J)v� �; ," �.;r ,, m,✓r i((r„�; �»m'r,� �1m r I,t��d,,, I v 4„VIA ter, w II I I I vf" rvl I "r.. lulu" ;�,,, Rrm i'4� rN, ,luu.N»„ ...v V ,/r Ji✓ r/w Ire y r✓ r r e( u r � r .lv,%,""°� t �"WI:, °'jirir, z,ylJ'"y„rr Ir�` o ,. (rr��✓z�r. ),:., t ,,,;�1�(tl ,,»'""�'rrr'"�r":l rt�,„1,.v,pl I ��I //, f" z � �.. v rvf�,,,,.. r,,".', r r;i„,f,,,rf ,,: ra,7 ,w' ✓,°p,,r ti y 7Yl r!rrr,! ,r8,,..1 I;'�f rrriP r.y�"ice/'r;, "» /A��+ ", yl6hr„ IJ „ ��j� N, r ll t H� /�i�r✓uer,, Nlar ,� ) H//�/ rf r r III II"II III'v�l�l �i �,�"„ r � a lrr yar, 'r/y,(%Y'9� e»;°"'�,✓f",r;/rf�zo zj I��V`/>�hoA �z",'ql 11, rrr„� �;�I l r r; r � �i frrn�',,,Iqr, ,,.. z'�'//r%%� ", ,.✓f� Ir y,»,ti""r",lJr r,'' 'i�r/�w�! a;, IJ ai( Ysz r /iii� r � � �P �yMW�p: '., �°., awf6, F ll„a„/ ,,r r,,,i."", 'llGi�//,,,,'i(I G'Y�,'�>'xrr�flo9rp µ,w"9}�%J"'."�/"r�✓i,,,..,..fy, �1/rr',/'"r is/r,,u �l�� I�'('(,,, (� ,,r i w� y �-.. /R ,. j �v r� LLI mg 3: CL ED Z � �:.. rr " r I r "h,"'8i'h'l'r'r 'U u y� / f ,✓ n„ //" ulmml �"�, / r r! IIII IIII O �i;r/%;/%�/�!: "' "a.z /'J,. 'rr1/r// r ✓ I., s9 /' ',',/j�/',' I'J � d u Lu LIL Lua / �//% IIIII''ICI luuuuuu IIIII ,,,;l—•; ,a,/., f �� %/ii y r.�r %a,/,1i%%r/"Or,%rl i,,,,G/,:,Y r!/rr C i / ri/✓;,� / i/; rig, %/,r,r.,.//i�% % :./ -, /. � �,/> ,N, III ` , , I I^ tl�IV y 4444YVV' j' I II qNl S i W1� Lu r r I III I O „i�. I .✓ -,�kr' �,/'l/ �y r.�r,,„/!,,,,' r(�iY" <i r//, �� d I r lifly�'i�l''ll Q i/�/r f yrµu,„ Zvi ;i:� '��"wv V%.rr II(;",,i,r r/1,/ �:,", ( ,:�>✓ "rr� /, U i,II.% '�1 ,�,., , � ,.. NII4 N4 ,... .., k,.,, r rr'l ,� r✓rii/ ,/r, ,., IN r I r„ � l/. .. mu,v ,h4 r. arl A//i..r: r rN..,;r N I.. n 6rr / '/ m,.,� ,'%°�,..✓ l „ r.r» "1//,r ��. / / �' f l fi 4 � .; ,,,rr v' ,,..,;,N�II ,r,:f��t�/ /d r,r �, ill 1 rdi. ,�.N� ,No,JH., ✓yr`r r�%/rv!_r,»ram,;,. /. ,.„ r,2H, „•,r to ,..; ,,Pr////%��Ir�,,,;rul,„, ,�V, /., ,, � ql o ,r.o,, ;yr, r✓IH"' v,r:,,,,, ,,,,,r,,/, � r" r7„,G Fm %'..:, ,,, %„ W ul "r�)/�� 1/' Y i/r Jr! ,pd %i' � � m l / r �" mo„NJ' ,.,Y'✓r� %ePi,..,;,, `y/i„,:., ,/1�ygN'rr.9«'rul I�yi✓r�,(�(I", : ;� +,?,,.I ��. F,r�,.!f� pI,�„ /��lYfj �/„c✓H,,% /9, »r, vrl ,;,";r :'fir,( „<,r"/ r, ,/»,,,.r {r r,J ^-. ! � ✓.., rr1` �r, /,. ilia,1".i r o r,;»,�r ,"�I CHI r.� �r IIIIIIIII IIIII Lu . Al " /O l r� / �j„ ✓/, �,/ ..,.. u� rc �,,it/'.,r,J t.",,. ., ;: r/ � r � � k, r /l r �r � r, ,,,r, / /r / F / 1, v,",.G/ ,/ �1 ,,,, � .v, ,rv, ✓!.. /r l/rl, r ,,,�»(r r 1; r✓ r 1 ,r � � � ,r r I 1 ,� r rrr. � „, ..,//� L, r. / , I Y, /,r d � // r,. I ,r. / � / >rrr >, v � � , r ) � l/ rrr.... r, / Y,r / /,1 r✓✓ri/ � // H �Ir IIII „» �� f �',, � � rir �I.//' f/ , l I ✓, I r r, i r r oVl,1 I / i7 o; , ... "r� r VN /qr 6JJblr r J,`",7 v,P4H�,.; 'li, ,Nr;" ,Elul,..„ I�' r s ,r/o/f <;��(r�'':.,,,,r %ii/r, 1/' 1 I� ��5� fyYfi,»d"./ rrl'�pll 1I1I % r,'� it o ➢Ir �I� J rH r ! P /�r9�l�,r j�frr/�/ rr Ijl l /I Q Wfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff "; ,,r ,ksg„J �ry j r N,/ Cj �J stl 7�N'U f�Ilr�VI JU�� w ��r,% ,II r�;, 1; rol°a ij e� / � ��YVr��rrfi 1yy�-(I rr' yep,F/"' -/,D �1 NMn � �. l� /;y,1��>If 1, {I!r �Jr ,e '"/// / „;d'"y r d 1 JAI,,b n,,'✓aa� mr>),' ijr%iri, a �V�4k�/Nr /l�r,, r uF r/Vr Ir ✓'J�r''" d 1��i�rar,V �r r� 1 Y/� rmT mr U. N N O N �i/„ �I(�,n err"f (l��1� � /, U ' ' ¢ LL _ /^ ff 1 �� err p a rl W V) O O O �.�..� r 1� rmVy 1 f U C"r , f LL N LL I Q v f /1/r1//l l r,�" Lu r I I / LL oc Q �� r f ll �` �1 J w "' r I 1. JH �� I r{I 6f v d � , J 2 = Lu w W U �u �o�tl� //��''� � .., r—� ,rrr I I , , l �%IHN)��INIr u'r r G, V ��// wY ,N;rhg�'%%7� fV"r✓ Ir, J < 0 wi LL O O LL r a�ro° !Hlrri�r err � }�,,,,, y rY��/r « /Y rrl'V� rrr�r ` �✓' Q Y,W1mHm, w,y'wuNlNu� rN 1 r 41 li wr ,, ✓ (� r N `/ or(�:zi(rm6 ' si'Fi'" r r(' nW✓",,I Z � �u0, r H a D 'Yr fr H Q O r , a Q p y a O `,� r �i �;, I Y„ r /� ��, �II �� N�qi .v LL L u Lu r" �/ ul L.I. r r u � , % � Irl Ir If�IrJ II friv UO o_ a � , IN cn 1 ila — �� rr �r / ✓ � I4� l br � a � J O Z ,��/ ��Wi, VI, J ; ! G f err I.v; r I L L V ��'E l! ,,(Cr(Ni 1r7 wvD d.: fir; L LL C) rl ✓ /�dIN✓r/�✓a i �, L.LJ y N� �ilb ylil lf' r i f fll,;w��V�;z✓IV(r VW�. fr � r�,,I l�)11e,' �rJiv'V�pu('I, �i," Ir !i ubr� NI � /r i fJJo r 0 Q �r U r qW�F/�� i�/ III i I j�✓, ,� ` /1j � 'I%w�� \r, (:�::1 '� Ily�✓I„� /�Y Vllu VV r e„ r I / Ir p (��,Gyq/ 1�n �a. ,.,, I! l��'� 'I� r',r�r ��..f �"..rP,��,"N✓ h v. %. ,�,, �l� .f, A,1 I FIGURE 4.2 Page 57 19 0 z 44 47— LO mj (A dm LLI CL 0 uJ Lu P Lli Lu U) om 0 Lu N . ............... j Lij 0 LIJ U) cn 0 Lu U. r*4 CN Ao'!31 0 co J LU V) 0 EE C14 LL (::) 0 rj N Lu LIJ 0 V) Lu U :D 0 LL LU rn Lu j Lu Lu Lf) < Lu Lu o Lu u (D (D 0 LL 0 0 j 0 F— LL F— Lu C) Cl) N u Lu < Ln Lu U 0 LL LL Lu < "Af FIGURE 4.3 Page 58 19 0 r u; �r)r„, �, rl%� r�.I� !f��1 YI)rrlFy;�r 1 ,� yVl`✓��rJ�:� d', \ � W / tifr I�I �i a Imp I I;IIII I i I� I � 0 q I� i /r err ,f o li r/ I W IIIII III Lu 0 Lu I r / I i 1 0l Z �i\J ,,.. ,W,/ i/�.r„ �„�✓%�;% w�,I�„ ;err li/ // ;r�rir r/ ii�iy ��'� , r /i y ri lull �¢. ✓ x 6 O � ,..,• I � j � `Ir)1WIi r'�I ri�C��) ty?4. ,��t��'1,+�i�i, �,, �p%yn➢n�9Mxr, r f �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��" ill �Y 4 " ,nn / nnnnnnii r f r / I r'It�lli4y, r I IIII I l I, ti 4 II. /r Rl r r O < r rr/�/// /W',ro, //. ',,i,;� 4 �j f ,,,' �ii��ii V �W � )nfnnm f ' 1 frvrra Nr;{ ,% V , N riiw;r., //' V I r I� JJ,ri G rl /f6„/, ��j:r V f '�I I,I Y I ��ii'�jll�Y IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII r / r ljyl i IIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII Illluwl pwl�IYYY1114r V!,, ' uuuuuuuuuuVVVVV r i IIII lY ri� f r � �� {;,U,,,,,, '�IIII � ,,, r% I I'I it �,Y tqi °' f I IIII W � � r �1 ri H�drye N"rr ��f)y �, a R" ,�' IV>"'1 y�✓�1RG9 ,..� �,6W o1RJ"ri 1��: I '�;f r// ��I�� / , ,,�% g'IVi J;, rj'NN,fif/W ltilry,', � � , / ij, t C / m r,ld 0 l �i/ �I�, �I..ee,N�'r w fa' f/ JfN�p... ,o �/ �r I,� �1�) W I�;� o r,l r� jm 1" �/ //�'�1�� f�l'fir �,.� ' f 1 % 6/� r '^ I� '�! /i a /lot po., f ��' /'�< ` � J,� f W pl , r r I 00000 ' (I //"� Ifs, c/�ilV r„N. r �y n'JJ�I�rIW I r�or.;L!y�, :/'�II !% �/Y1,✓J»`!ri1 o°��r',, I Y r I li I tttt i I r' ,1 „/ NII�, G,.. �„'�,��t, ;!/ 1 r. /l/, r,��/Irr ✓, ,�H� �.;rr-., r ,.�s R /. /� r S , r � / I w I �l��l�, ^1 I! r � r J!/if r� r �rrRl ✓%.� i✓( J'�d I is'J��rr%I f �� rini'//�'/r i f 1f��11��I � �Y"w", r11„y,��, ,;', (�rm -:.�✓%� w� ,�� r J r//il� �'�/PN•r/i ;"nll,rgf0�� - W h 1a V Nr rr r 9 N m 9W Oa V J uS l LL u I N H y� rr D N UN LL a. j ,r LU oc LL OC NII O oLU ; U - N :D W O LL W m = W J Q Q Q W Lu W W W U J W II LL p Q 0 � oc o J F- z o N z LL 0 W II I c a oll Ln W z QT W U m o = LL V �� f LL_ s I I ,, r � t I I IIIIII d �m W FIGURE 4.4 Page 59 19 0 LO J Ol LLI 3: CL E2 2 Z 'E LLI LU < he z z w Lli Mp, Lu .............. All ui ............ ANN 0 ..........."I'll , LU Lij Lu U) Cl) Lu LL 2 � I - qq F- F- C) LL 0 F- j LU LU LL EE 0 o 0 U r-4 D Lu 0 LL LU rr) Lu j Lu Lu V V) < Lu Lu Lu u 0 (D (D LL 0 0 0 0 J F- LL < C:) Lu 0 F- r.4 u C/) . Lu < F- r-i Ln cr- Lu F- < F- U F- 0 LL LL F- 0 Lu FIGURE 4.5 Page 60 19 0 Lo mj LLI .C. CL 0 "E 0 Lu uj < he z 49 W, w z Lu A7 ui Arms, o Lu Lij Lu U) LL Lu CN W LL C) 0 0 j LU E2 r,4 LL 0 o N a, a 0 U r-4 D 0 LIJ LL LU rr) Lu j Lu Lu < V) Lu Lu 0Lu u (D (D LL 0 0 0 0 F_ j < C:) LL Lu 0 r.4 u Lu < Ln U) < LU kD U _j LL LL FIGURE 4.6 f%A Page 6-1 19 0 CL 4e mj LLI >M 0 -674 uJ Lu < LL z b, w LL) z Lu ill"i"'. k U) Lu /A/Ml/ 0 ............ Lu Lij PI 0 Lu U) cn z 0 Lu C*+4 LL j LU V) LL EE r-4 0 c LU r,4 LU 0 V) U 64 :D Lu 0 LL LU rr) Lu j ac Lu Lu < Lu Lu Lu (D (D u 0 0 LL 0 0 j 0 LL F— C:) Cj) LU 0 < r.4 u Lu . Lu < r-i Ln oc U 0 LL LL Lu < FIGURE 4.7 ^0% Page 162 19 0 CL W 0 K' LO mj 0 LLI �t CL >M 0 .......... uJ Lu UL z W, w Lu .......................................... Clf) ui ........... U) 0 Lu 0 .............. . ............ Lij Lu U) C/) ui r-4 C r4 LL 0 0� a. J Lu (A E r,4 o LL 0 o r*4 N C:) U '* CN4 Lu 0 � a. LU LL --I rn Lu j < (D a- < Lu Lu < z Lu Lu Lu U 0 0 LL 0 0 ';�- 0 j r-4 Z LL < C:) < C) N < Lu < 0 N u Cl) Lu (/) Lu F-- < F- U F- F- 0 LL u- < A1110 FIGURE 4.8 Page 63 19 0 C.) z mj LLI CL z 0 LLI Lu W, W, z Lu 0 z A" Imp/p A ui F,W/111/1 C4, AA/1 0 Cn N LIJ j Lij F- 0 F- U) (a) z LU z ui r'.4 UL CN j LU LL E r-4 LL 0 C r-4 a N C:) Cl) Lu LL U - r-4 0 Lu rn Lu j n M: (D < < Lu Lu a- Lu Lf) < z F- LU Lu 0 Lu U (D (D 0 LL 0 .;t C) C) F- r�4 (D Z N < Lu C:) 0- Lu N < 0 :E < u Lu < F-- < F— U LL LL F- 0 Lu < FIGURE 4.9 Page 64 19 0 Lh z A,"1/4" mj 0 LLI Z 2 uJ Lu LL he z clo Lil z Lu .............. U) Lu ...................... ......... 0 M. Em/m/m, 0 Cl) Lij Lu "I............. 0 U) Lu cn z Lu r-4 00 0 rII LL 0 j N LU LL E C14 0 C r-4 LL C:) V) LL U r-4 D 0 0 LU Lu CIO Lu j n M: (D < Lu a- < Lu Lf) < z od Lu Lu Lu U 0 LL 0 .;t 0 M F- 0 Z N 0 C:) N Lu M 0 < r.4 u Lu < F-- < F-- U 0 LL LL < FIGURE 4.10 Page 65 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4.2.12 Summary of Existing Condition NEM Modeled Operations A total of 64,128 annual aircraft flight operations were modeled to develop the Existing Condition NEM. This equates to 176 average daily operations. Table 4.11 provides a breakdown of these operations by aircraft category. In addition to the 64,128 annual fixed-wing flight operations, 7,383 annual aircraft run-up operations (i.e., standing takeoff operations) were modeled to develop the Existing Condition NEM. This equates to 26 average daily run-up operations. TABLE 4.11 SUMMARY OF 2021 FLIGHT OPERATIONS CATEGORY ANNUAL AVERAGE OPERATIONS DAILY OPERATIONS AC/AT JET 217563 59.08 AC/AT PROP 67593 18.06 GA PROP ITINERANT 197305 52.89 GA PROP LOCAL 27369 6.49 GA JET 107161 27.84 GA HELO 37698 10.13 MIL ITINERANT 268 0.73 MIL LOCAL 83 0.23 MIL HELO 88 0.24 TOTAL 647128 175.69 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. Sources: FAA OPSNET, 2021, FlightRadar24, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates While the noise contours represent an average annual day, the number of aircraft operations per day varies during the 365-day period. Historically, the number of aircraft operations have been the highest during March and lowest during September. In addition, certain holidays and local events attract out-of-town visitors that often utilize general aviation aircraft(e.g., Fantasy Fest, New Year's Eve). The noise exposure may be higher during times when there are more aircraft operations, and lower during times when there are less aircraft operations. The yearly day-night average sound level takes these variations into account by using the average annual day. Page 66 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4.3 NOISE CONTOURS AND NONCOMPATIBLE LAND USES The information presented thus far represents the key data necessary to develop the input for the AEDT. From these data, the AEDT generates lines of equal sound levels centered upon the runway. These lines of equal noise exposure are referred to as noise contours and are based on the DNL sound metric. The contours calculated for this study include the DNL 65-1 70-, and 75-dB contours. Aircraft noise, aircraft noise terminology, and effects of aircraft noise on people are described in greater detail in Appendix B. Figure 4.11 presents the Existing Condition noise contours superimposed over the existing land use base map and is referred to as the Existing Condition NEM for Part 150 purposes. A large-scale version of the NEM is included in Appendix G.The base map provides community and airport geographic reference data such as runway configuration, roads, streets, and bodies of water. The surrounding land uses and the location of noise-sensitive facilities were identified from aerial photography, online database research, and field verification. This figure assists in understanding the geographic relationship of the airport to the community and to the noise contours generated by the airport's aircraft activity. Figure 4.12 presents the 2022 Existing Condition noise contours with the 2013 Existing Condition noise contours (from the previous (NEM Update) superimposed; this figure is provided for comparison purposes. Figure 4.11 illustrates current compatible and noncompatible land uses surrounding EYW that are found within the DNL 65-7 70-, and 75-dB noise contours. Noncompatible land uses include single-family, multi- family, and transient lodging residential uses, as well as places of worship and community facilities (institutional land uses) and are indicated by a crosshatch pattern. Portions of Key West by the Sea Condominiums, Ocean Walk Apartments, and Las Salinas Condominiums are within the DNL 65 dB and greater contour. Places of worship and community facilities (institutional land uses) within the DNL 65 dB contour include Grace Lutheran Church and School, and Catholic Charities St. Bede's Village. Transient lodging facilities within the DNL 65 dB contour include the Hyatt Residence Club Key West, Windward Pointe, and Hampton Inn Key West. Single- and multi-family land uses within the DNL 65 dB contour that are shown as compatible, which would normally be considered noncompatible, have been rendered compatible through participation in the Noise Insulation Program (NIP) (see Appendix A, Section A.6). In addition to residential and institutional uses, Figure 4.11 also indicates parks and recreational properties surrounding EYW that are found within the various noise contours within the Existing Condition NEM.These include Riggs Wildlife Refuge/Bridle Path, Little Hamaca City Park, 11 t" Street Public Boat Ramp, portions of Fran Ford White-crowned Pigeon Preserve, Smathers Beach, and Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. There are no National Register properties located within the noise contours. Table 4.12 summarizes the acreage, by land use category, located within the DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB contours. Table 4.13 provides the number of housing units and population within the DNL 65-, 70-, and 75-dB contours. Single-family housing units that were split by a contour were counted in the higher-level contour. For multi-family residential and transient lodging facilities, the number of housing units was distributed amongst the various contours based on the proportion of the parcel's acreage that fell within each contour. The number of housing units was rounded to the nearest whole number. To quantify the single-family and multi-family population within the existing condition DNL 65-, 70-, and 75- dB noise contours, U.S. Census Bureau,American Community Survey(ACS), 5-Year Estimates population Page 67 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION data were utilized. Condominiums and apartments were considered fully occupied as these are usually owner-occupied or long-term leases. The data for the City of Key West indicated an average household size of 2.25, which was multiplied by the number of housing units to calculate estimated population. Estimated population was rounded to the nearest whole number. To calculate transient lodging population, Key West Hotel Occupancy Tourism Statistics were obtained from the Key West Travel Guide. The number of available transient lodging units was determined for the Hyatt Residence Club Key West, Windward Pointe, and Hampton Inn Key West. (A. Henriquez, personal communication, April 14, 2022) The average occupancy rate of 84.175% (for 2019)was then multiplied by the number of units to calculate estimated population. Estimated population was rounded to the nearest whole number. Table 4.13 identifies the number of housing units that have participated in the NIP. These residences are now considered compatible land uses. The distribution of population between mitigated and unmitigated is based upon the number of mitigated and unmitigated housing units.Additional details regarding homes that have participated in the NIP are included in Appendix A, Section A.6. TABLE 4.12 EXISTING CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES-ACREAGE DNL 65 DNL 70 DNL 75+ TOTAL OVER LAND USE TYPE (ACRES) TO 70 TO 75 dBA DNL 65 dBA dBA dBA Airport 61.8 72.5 87.3 221.6 Commercial/Office 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Institutional 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Open Space 3.0 0.6 1 0.0 3.6 Public/Semi-Public 80.7 18.2 4.1 103.0 Residential -Multi-Family 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.6 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 Ocean Walk Apartments 9.6 4.1 0.2 13.9 Las Salinas Condominiums 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 Residential -Single Family 18.6 7.3 0.3 26.2 Transient Lodging 11.9 0.6 0.1 12.6 Transportation/Utility/Right of Way 9.9 2.7 0.0 12.6 Vacant 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Water 69.8 4.1 0.4 74.3 Total Acreage 275.0 110.2 92.4 477.6 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates and HD Mapping, 2022 Page 68 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4.13 EXISTING CONDITION NOISE EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION DNL 65 DNL 70 DNL 75+ TOTAL OVER NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS TO 70 TO 75 dBA DNL 65 dBA dBA dBA Unmitigated (i.e., Noncompatible) Residential —Multi-Family 5 0 0 5 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 12 0 0 12 Ocean Walk Apartments 160 68 3 231 Las Salinas Condominiums 18 0 0 18 Residential —Single Family 41 2 0 43 Transient Lodging 146 8 0 154 (Occupancy Rate 84.175%) Total Unmitigated Housing Units 382 78 3 463 Mitigated' (i.e., Compatible) Residential —Multi-Family 3 1 0 4 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 88 0 0 88 Residential —Single Family 87 60 7 154 Total Mitigated Housing Units 178 61 7 246 Total Housing Units 560 139 10 709 DNL 65 DNL 70 DNL 75+ TOTAL OVER POPULATION TO 70 TO 75 dBA DNL 65 dBA dBA dBA Unmitigated (i.e., Noncompatible) Residential —Multi-Family 11 0 0 11 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 27 0 0 27 Ocean Walk Apartments 360 153 7 520 Las Salinas Condominiums 41 0 0 41 Residential —Single Family 92 5 0 97 Transient Lodging 327 17 0 344 (Occupancy Rate 84.175%) Total Unmitigated Population 858 175 7 13040 Mitigated' (i.e., Compatible) Residential —Multi-Family 7 0 0 7 Key West by the Sea Condominiums 198 0 0 198 Residential —Single Family 195 135 16 346 Total Mitigated Population 400 135 16 551 Total Population 13258 310 23 19591 Notes: Population and housing units are mitigated through participation in the NIP. Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce. Census Bureau, QuickFacts, 2021. https://www.hyattresidenceclub.com/resorts/hyatt-windward-pointe, 2022. Alexis Averette Henriquez, Director of Sales, Hampton Inn Key West, 2022. Key West Hotel Occupancy Tourism Statistics, Key West Travel Guide, 2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates and HD Mapping, 2022 Page 69 9;epdn W3N X ui CD dVW 3unSOdX3 3SION IMOdUIV IVNOIIVNH31NI S2 IS3M A3M NOUICINOO DMISIX3 ZZOZ OHIO >1 -0 m 41 (an)0 wo 0 L-y L- 0 a) a) >LL >LL u) L 0 L 0 co M L- 0 LL LL 0 — C) (n , >, 0 C', c: m a) a)F- a) o 4- 0,U) E =�l a) a) 0 0 U) " 0 o E -Fz -5 L- D "'= CL >_1 c sso UL o a) o a) 5 co —0 a) .�= :t-- 0 " 0 = = LL a- U- 2t 0 C� cu a) C E E E co 0 m 0 E LL T- M a) -0 a) cu E� c/) z LU a) 0) 0 0 0 —c -1-5 E co uj ............ u a) m co e a) a) 0 0 0 U) -r- a) z U) CO a) a) a) c: L) a) c: E C: E -7- -E w -0 0 (n (n (n 0 0 U) co 0 ""qy Q- =; a) a) a) a) ///n,t�l� 0 M Of Of ll� 0� F- NO� .060, AM ME, "A/ Tj > 1g, E = E L LL cu LL D AW 0) Al 'M* xj r 2 ED plgi fill" 0 h "Ol —CE CE cu co C) =3 CU 0 -J -J -J a) (1) 3) "Yo z z z L C (n \p) 1%(. z E 0, Lo C) Lo JVP� lou 0 (.0 F- r-- p On", "Ar 0 0 "Ilk 0 z '111ilompt V, A`9,/`�,, st, 4, a gg I 6th Te A, �A A"s "Vow"', op, 46 A /M 4T 4W t A 7, gV 7, or S ca 6,0 75 c 0 kV Cl) r; pp,A 1, 1 13 rool(101, Q, wr I 0)4)pjh� e W )0, ®R,(a A u V, 4) .2 OPP, CD ON," (D fcwel f �10 2 g7l.40) 0 N 'n PA")0,�, SL 4 A AN, 'om V All vg-:C�, %'A' "S X% �pj a, %f -A JN v, I&V AA -'!I�3�zoz[[-t7ainBi=l\sejnbi=l\sdew\alepd iseMAe>i\sloe!OJd\O-n's9lu!OOssV�?$Obu-lAqdjnhqejoqe(]\xoqdoic]\000jE!Bpe—elup\sjesn\:O u Nd 09:St7:�[ZZOZ/OZ/S:PE)AeS GJU(j PXWT -!I!P--D b4 n 3N- :ql d 94epdn W3N X ui SdVW MmSiOdX3 3SION N011laNO3 9NllSlX3sn0lA3Hd C"4 IMOdUIV IVNOIIVNH31NI (INV NOMIGN03 DMISIX3 IN3Huno:10 N0SlHVdW03 IS3M A3M cu -0 cu Co 0 ii2 0 C/5 0 0 >1 co 6 cLo >LL >LL U) >, cu J) L o o Co LL C) A, LL 0 — (n Co w co c o La) 3: m a) a) o a) cu '8 LD co co M 0 E a) o -0 o (1) 0 -0-0 0 m E -0 0- 7111 11"1 -11, CD LL o 0 0 a) y -2 co 2 0 '§'ss C-) T- Of U) LL 0- LL C-) JE, 0 % _0 0 cu —j U) >1 U) 4) cu — (1) (D 0< CD E (D ILL _0 0 E C� LL T- CU cu 0 cy) 0 .......... Z LU 0 -0 I........ 4, 'a) cOu E m m a) 75- 0 LU a) 0 = l;-- :i-- L� L- co c: C: c F % —J U) a) a) a) cn CD -a cn cu E a) — ca "Ag vi m 0 L) LU //m, 'Mill E am 0- 0 m 0 0 am wo'-�,,- I'll :� 0 z f f t 0 ,gwi m 12 o,- of 12 Z) pow" sA i C: 0 IRA 141 Ardmall (7f, Iffloll ji, _0 11A loll"" 0 91s ,(Am 0 A, VA A-I\'17 C) L E Wl 'A 0) cu Q 0 U- CID 0 Lp 0 a) LL pj D P CD 0 x 0 K/ X LU C a'30) irmV j LU m a) —1 -0 a) 0, A 0 a) 0 0 -- pl, ggp p > z z glA 0 —j ,IV/ L- C: c 0 LZ ffffMl//'l a) AS C) z -0 (n z U) NN 0 cN—0 E L C)Lo C)Lo 0 U) 0) U) N(D N C�o 0 X ...... 0 Z 11,kV vM1,111:1 NO -01 m .............. th Ter, 'g 10, 4 'Al ISO, alt, 0 3,105 N� A M 'J"I if"'; ym IV,1�0) ,, �l POP "OD 7, A, 0 ofs J,(p IRA% �j %; p A lh, 4f 'I 'bv , , w U) 3) 4 //A q P", ld� 0 Alf," f p, V, 1110 g A ing, "',NO "C & "o'd jf� lift, P W '00 III Otl:ZC:L ZZ0Z/9/6:P@AIE!S aJI?(]'pxLu'sjn0lUO3 9SPIA UOPPU03 bulls!x3 snO!A�ud PUE!buli juanno jo uospudwoo Z[-t7 ajnBi=I\sajnbi=l\sduw\ajupdn A3N 158M AaA\Sl3G!0Jd\o-n'sajupossV sobe-1 Aqdjnh qejoqe(]\xoqdoici\000'jeBpe-alup\sjesn\:o:qlud DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX A HISTORY OF THE NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROCESS AT KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT A.1 INTRODUCTION At the request of the Monroe County Ad Hoc Committee on Noise, the following history of the noise compatibility planning process at EYW was prepared and included herein. Questions regarding this history are frequently asked during the Ad Hoc Committee meetings, and it was felt that providing an easily accessible, complete history would be beneficial to the public. On October 26, 1998, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (as the Airport Sponsor) submitted to the FAA the descriptions of the Sponsor's proposed noise compatibility measures and other documentation produced during the Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program study conducted from April 1997 through October 1998. This is the original NEM and NCP and consists of the Sponsor's recommendations to implement eight (8) program measures. The 1998 Existing Condition and 2003 Future Condition NEMs were found to be in compliance with applicable requirements by the FAA on November 9, 1998. Subsequently, the FAA completed its review of the NCP and determined that the procedural and substantive requirements of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act and 14 CFR Part 150 had been satisfied. The overall program, therefore, was approved by the FAA effective May 7, 1999. The FAA approved six (6) of the eight (8) proposed action measures in the NCP in full. Two (2) measures were disapproved. The approved and disapproved measures are described in Appendix A, Sections A.4 and A.S. Annual noise contour updates were prepared for the years 1999 through 2005. The 2005 Noise Contour Update was completed in 2007. The DNL 65 dB contour included the area formerly designated Phase 6 of the Noise Insulation Program (NIP), as well as a few additional homes along Riviera Drive that were not previously included in Phase 6. The FAA agreed to include the recommended homes in Phase 6 but required that the Noise Exposure Maps be officially updated. On June 9, 2008, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners submitted the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation to the FAA. The 2008 Existing Condition and 2013 Future Condition NEMs were found to be incompliance with applicable requirements by the FAA on August 27, 2008. In 2011, EYW and the FAA agreed it would be appropriate to prepare an update to the NEMs and NCP. On October 29, 2013, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners submitted the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation to the FAA. The 2013 Existing Condition and 2018 Future Condition NEMs were found to be in compliance with applicable requirements by the FAA on December 19, 2013. On September 15, 2014, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners submitted to the FAA the descriptions of the Sponsor's proposed noise compatibility measures and other documentation produced during the Noise Exposure Map and Noise Compatibility Program Update study conducted from November 2011 through September 14, 2014. This NCP is an update to the one approved in 1999 and consists of the Sponsor's recommendations to implement twenty-five (25) program measures. Of these 25 program measures, the Sponsor only requested FAA approval of thirteen (13), including seven (7) Land Use measures and six(6) Program Management measures.The FAA completed its review and determined that Page A-1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION the procedural and substantive requirements of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act and 14 CFR Part 150 had been satisfied. The overall program, therefore, was approved by the FAA effective March 11, 2015. All the recommendations of the program that requested FAA approval were approved. Section A.2 details the recommendations for which the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners sought FAA approval under the most recent Part 150 Study process (2015). Section A.3 lists measures that the County and/or Key West International Airport have vested authority to implement (i.e., those not requiring FAA approval). Section A.4 describes operational measures that were recommended in the Original NCP and were approved by the FAA. Section A.5 describes operational measures that were recommended in the Original NCP that were disapproved by the FAA. Section A.6 describes and illustrates the status of the Noise Insulation Program. Note that measures beginning with"LU"are land use measures,"PM"are program management measures, and "OM" are operational measures. A.2 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR AND APPROVED BY THE FAA LU-1 Provide noise insulation for noncompatible structures in exchange for avigation easements It is recommended that owners of noncompatible dwelling units and certain other noise sensitive structures located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM be offered the opportunity to participate in a Noise Insulation Program (NIP). The NIP shall include noncompatible single-and multi-family dwelling units located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM, which includes Key West by the Sea Condominiums, the Flagler Court Townhomes, as well as the noise sensitive Grace Lutheran Church and School, and the Catholic Charities Facility that are determined to be noncompatible in accordance with FAA Order 5100.38D Appendix R. Property owners will be required to grant avigation easements to Monroe County in exchange for noise insulation. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those shown on the Year 2013 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map, at which point the easement is no longer binding. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. While the FAA does not require that an easement be given in exchange for sound insulation, the Sponsor has the discretion to impose such a requirement. The measure itself need not be tied specifically to the 2013 NEM. If NEMs are updated in the future, without an NCP update, this measure would be applicable to eligible structures within the 65+ dB contour of any future FAA accepted NEMs determined to accurately reflect the airport's operations at the time of the request for FAA funding. The Sponsor shall seek FAA approval of the final language of any avigation easement(s) acquired under this measure prior to execution of such easement(s). Measure History: In the Original NCP the Sponsor submitted this measure for FAA approval: Provide Noise Insulation in Exchange for Avigation Easements: Page A-2 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION A program for noise insulation of existing noncompatible structures is recommended for noncompatible single-family dwellings (and multi-family dwellings of four units or less) within the DNL 65+dB contour of the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, With Program Implementation, in exchange for an avigation easement. Priority should be given first to homeowners located within the DNL 75 dB contour, then to homeowners located within the DNL 70 dB contour, and finally to homeowners located within the DNL 65 dB contour. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those projected for the year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. Eligible homeowners will be given the option of participating in either this program or the purchase program in Measure 4 below. If funding is not adequate to implement both programs simultaneously, this program will be offered first. A program for noise insulation of noncompatible structures is also recommended for Key West High School. At the time when the high school is being renovated, measures to achieve a Noise Level Reduction (NRL) of 30 dB should be incorporated into the design and construction of all classrooms, libraries, offices, and other rooms for which noise insulation is specifically justified because of the substantial and disruptive effect of aircraft noise. In its May 7, 1999 Record of Approval (ROA), the FAA approved this measure with no additional verbiage. Current Status: Since approval in 1999, the Sponsor has successfully implemented the measure from 2000 to 2012 and 2016 to 2022. Key West High School was rebuilt with noise attenuation measures incorporated in the design and construction of the buildings. By May 2023, a total of 296 out of 336 eligible single-family homes and 185 out of 206 eligible condominiums will have participated in the residential noise insulation program. This will result in a participation rate of almost 90% at Key West by the Sea (KWBTS) and just over 88%for the single-family homes. LU-2 Purchase avigation easements It is recommended that owners of noncompatible dwelling units and other noise sensitive structures located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM that do not participate in the NIP be offered the opportunity to participate in the Avigation Easement Acquisition Program. The Avigation Easement Acquisition Program shall include noncompatible single- and multi-family dwelling units located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM as well as Grace Lutheran Church and School, and the Catholic Charities Facility that are determined to be noncompatible in accordance with FAA Order 5100.38D Appendix R. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. This measure need not be tied specifically to the 2013 NEM. If NEMs are updated in the future, without an NCP update, this measure would be applicable to eligible structures within the 65+ dB contour of any future FAA accepted NEMs determined to accurately reflect the airport's operations at the time of the request for FAA funding. The Sponsor Page A-3 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION shall seek FAA approval of the final language of any avigation easement(s) acquired under this measure prior to executionof such easement(s). Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: Since its approval in 2015, the Sponsor has not implemented the measure. LU-3 Rescind approval of the 1999 ROA measure to purchase homes, provide noise insulation, and then resell the homes with avigation easements In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program,the FAA approved a measure to purchase homes, provide noise insulation, and resell the homes with an avigation easement. It is recommended that approval of this measure be rescinded due to the successful implementation of the NIP, and the high cost of implementing such a measure. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. At the Sponsor's request and in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.35(d)(5), the FAA withdraws its 1999 approval for the following measure originally published in the 1999 ROA: Purchase Homes, Provide Noise Insulation, then Resell with Easements. A program to purchase existing homes, provide noise insulation, then resell the homes with avigation easements is recommended for noncompatible single-family dwellings (and multi-family dwellings of four units or less) within the DNL65+dB contour of the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, With Program Implementation. Priority should be given first to homeowners located within the DNL 75 dB contour, then to homeowners located within the DNL 70 dB contour, and finally to homeowners located within the DNL 65 dB contour. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those projected forthe year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. Eligible homeowners will be given the option of participating in either this program or the noise insulation program in Measure 3 above. If funding is not adequate to implement both programs simultaneously, Measure 3 will be offered first. Measure History: In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program,the FAA approved the above measure with no further verbiage. Since approval in 1999, the Sponsor has not implemented the measure. LU-4 Rescind approval of the 1999 ROA measure to rezone two vacant parcels In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program,the FAA approved a measure to rezone two vacant parcels to prevent noncompatible development. These properties are located at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 t" Street, and on South Roosevelt Boulevard adjacent to airport property. It is recommended that approval of this measure be rescinded. It will be replaced with a new local measure, LU-6, that is under the jurisdiction of Monroe County, rather than the City of Key West. Page A-4 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Because the City of Key West has not agreed to rezone the two subject parcels, at the Sponsor's request and in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.35(d)(5), the FAA withdraws its 1999 approval for the following measure originally published in the 1999 ROA: Rezone Vacant Parcels. It is recommended that the County of Monroe direct a written request to the City of Key West to rezone two vacant parcels to prevent noncompatible development. One parcel on the southwest corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 t" Street (Parcel ID # 65100.000000) would be rezoned from single family residential development (SF) to an airport noise compatible land use zoning such as limited commercial (LC). Another parcel on South Roosevelt Boulevard (Parcel ID # 65090.000100) would be rezoned from coastal low density residential(LDR-C) to an airport noise and public safety compatible land use zoning such as limited commercial(LC). Measure History: In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program,the FAA approved the above measure with no further verbiage. Since approval in 1999, this measure was not implemented by the Airport Sponsor because the City of Key West did not agree to rezone the two parcels. Current Status: The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners purchased the parcel on the southwest corner of Flagler Avenue and 11th Street (Parcel ID#65100.000000) on November 6, 2013 for $500,000, according to the Monroe County Property Appraiser's office. The Warranty Deed was filed and recorded in the official records of Monroe County in Book 2658, Pages 1224-1225, Document Number 1957590 on November 14, 2013. LU-5 Rescind approval of the 1999 ROA measure to acquire the vacant parcel at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 th Street In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program,the FAA approved a measure to acquire the vacant parcel, located at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 t" Street to prevent noncompatible development. It is recommended that approval of this measure be rescinded. It will be replaced with new measure LU-6. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. At the Sponsor's request and in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.35(d)(5), the FAA withdraws its 1999 approval for the following measure originally published in the 1999 ROA: Acquire Vacant Parcel. It is recommended that the vacant parcel on the southwest corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 t" Street (Parcel ID # 65100.000000) be acquired to prevent noncompatible development if the City of Key West does not rezone the parcel to an airport noise compatible land use zoning. Measure History: In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West NCP, the FAA approved the above measure stating: Page A-5 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Approved under 14 CFR Part 150 with respect to the described vacant land within the DNL 65 dB contour where it can be demonstrated that the propertyis s in imminent danger of being developed noncompatibly and local controls are insufficient to prevent that development. Mitigation with respect to new noncompatible development that is allowed to occur on this property is outside the parameters of this Part 150 approval. However, the FAA would encourage local government to exercise its prerogative to change the zoning to a compatible use prior to development. LU-6 Purchase an avigation easement from the owner of the vacant parcel at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 11th Street It is recommended that the owner of the vacant parcel located at the corner of Flagler Avenue and 11t" Street (Parcel ID: 00065090-000100) be offered the opportunity to sell an avigation easement to Monroe County. In addition to permitting aircraft overflight and associated noise, this avigation easement will specifically prohibit noncompatible development on this parcel. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Eligibility for FAA funding will be determined by the FAA in accordance with the current FAA Order 5100.38, Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Handbook when the grant application is submitted for consideration. Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: On May 15, 2014, the City of Key West Planning Commission passed Planning Board Resolution No. 2014-33. This Resolution stated that "prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate that the buildings will be sound-proof per Section due to their proximity to the airport and their location within a noise-contour zone in compliance with Section 26-191(1)." In June 2015, Monroe County applied for FAA grant funds to acquire the Avigation Easement. In April 2016, the FAA approved the Avigation Easement proposed by Monroe County. In June 2016, Monroe County (through their noise consultants)reached out to the developer, Randy Allen with Reef Enterprises, LLC,to determine if there was any interest in selling an Avigation Easement to Monroe County, which there was not. By August 2016, two building were constructed, and the City of Key West required the developer to provide a testing report from a qualified acoustical consultant or engineer, experienced in conducting NLR field testing,verifying that the buildings meet an average outdoor-to-indoor noise level reduction (NLR)of 25 dB or greater. A total of ten (10) single-family dwellings were constructed and are known as the Enclave on Riviera. LU-7 Rescind approval of the measure to establish airport noise and public safety compatible land use zoning In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program, the FAA approved a measure directing Monroe County and the City of Key West to develop airport noise and public safety compatible land use zoning to prevent noncompatible development in the vicinity of the airport. It is recommended that approval of this measure be rescinded. It will be replaced with a new local measure, PM-10. Page A-6 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2015 FAA Action: Approved. At the Sponsor's request and in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.35(d)(5), the FAA withdraws its 1999 approval for the following measure originally published in the 1999 ROA: Establish Compatible Land Use Zoning. Establishment of airport noise compatible land use zoning and public safety compatible land use zoning is recommended, as required by Florida Statutes Chapters 163 and 333. The County of Monroe will seek the cooperation of the City of Key West to establish airport noise compatible land use zoning and public safety compliance land use zoning. Measure History: In its May 7, 1999 ROA of the Key West Noise Compatibility Program, the FAA approved the above measure with no further verbiage. Since approval in 1999, this measure was not implemented by the Airport Sponsor because the City of Key West did not update the City's Land Development Code prior to recommendation of PM-10. PM-1 Continue to utilize a consultant to fulfill the role of Airport Noise Program Coordinator It is recommended that Monroe County continue to utilize a consultant to fulfill the role of Airport Noise Program Coordinator. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Eligibility for FAA funding will be determined by the FAA in accordance with the current FAA Order 5100.38, Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Handbook when the grant application is submitted for consideration. Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: Deborah Murphy Lagos & Associates has been the Airport Noise Program Coordinator since 2015. PM-3 Prepare, print, and distribute full color informational inserts in a format that is compatible with the Jeppesen Sanderson manual, which describe all voluntary noise abatement procedures It is recommended that KWIA prepare, print, and distribute a full color informational insert in a format that is compatible with the Jeppesen Sanderson manual that provides a description of all components of KWIA's voluntary operational noise abatement program. This would be useful for educating both citizens and pilots. It is recommended that KWIA provide color copies of the pilot handout to the Fixed Base Operator (FBO) and airline station managers, and ask that they be placed in accessible locations at the FBO and distributed to pilots. Prior to release, language in the pilot handout should be reviewed for wording and content by the appropriate FAA office. The content of the pilot handout is subject to specific approval by appropriate FAA officials. Page A-7 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Prior to release, language in the pilot handout must be reviewed and approved for wording and content by the appropriate FAA office. The content of the pilot handout is subject to specific approval by appropriate FAA officials. Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: A double-sided 8.5" x 11" pilot handout was prepared, and FAA approval was obtained on September 19, 2016. Color copies of the pilot handout were distributed to the FBO and airline station managers. The FBO placed the handouts in a location that is easily accessible to pilots. The Airport Noise Program Coordinator replenishes the supply of handouts as needed. Figures A.1 —A.2 are a copy of the pilot handout. The handout is also available on the airport's website at https:Heyw.com/noise-concerns. PM-4 Post framed, weatherproof, large-scale versions of pilot handout on the airside at the FBO and airline terminal It is recommended that KWIA provide a framed, weatherproof, large-scale version of the pilot handout to the FBO to be posted on the airside where it can be seen by pilots as they enter and exit the FBO. It is also recommended that KWIA post a framed, weatherproof, large-scale version of the pilot handout on the airside at the airline terminal where it can be seen by commercial service pilots as they enter and exit the terminal. 2015 FAA Action:Approved. Prior to publication and release,the language in the large-scale pilot handout must be reviewed and approved for wording and content by the appropriate FAA office. The content of the pilot handout is subject to specific approval by appropriate FAA officials. Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: Since its approval in 2015,the Sponsor has not implemented the measure because an appropriate location could not be located. PM-6 Purchase and install lighted airfield information signs to promote use of voluntary noise abatement procedures It is recommended that that KWIA purchase lighted information signs to be installed on the airfield to promote the use of noise abatement procedures. These signs will replace the existing signs. Prior to purchase and installation, the proposed language on signage must be reviewed and approved by the FAA. The signs must be designed and installed in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/5340-18 E, Standards for Airport Sign Systems. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Prior to purchase and installation, the proposed language on signage, which must clearly indicate that the noise abatement procedures are voluntary, must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate FAA office and the signs must be designed and installed in accordance with current version of FAA Advisory Circular 150/5340-18, Standards for Airport Sign Systems, at the time of the request regardless of the funds source. Page A-8 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: Since its approval in 2015,the Sponsor has not implemented the measure. PM-7 Establish a noise and flight track monitoring program by acquiring two portable noise monitors and an FAA-approved flight track monitoring system It is recommended that KWIA establish a noise and flight track monitoring program and acquire two portable noise monitors and an FAA-approved flight track monitoring system. The noise and flight track monitoring system will not be used for enforcement purposes either by in-situ measurement of any preset noise thresholds or for mandatory enforcement of any voluntary noise abatement measure. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. However, for purposes of aviation safety, this approval does not extend to the use of monitoring equipment for enforcement purposes by in-situ measurement of any pre-set noise thresholds and shall not be used for mandatory enforcement of any voluntary measure. Measure History: None. This is a new measure introduced in 2015. Current Status: Since its approval in 2015, the Sponsor has not implemented the measure. PM-8 Update noise contours as needed In order to identify and disclose any significant changes in the size or shape of the noise contours it is recommended that the County of Monroe update the KWIA noise contours for comparison to the Year 2013 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map, if certain criteria are met. These criteria can be monitored and documented using the noise and flight track monitoring system. 2015 FAA Action: Approved. Eligibility for FAA funding will be determined by the FAA in accordance with the current FAA Order 5100.38, Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Handbook when the grant application is submitted for consideration. The FAA requires sponsors update their NEMs in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.21(d)(1)—(4). Measure History: In the Original NCP the Sponsor submitted this measure for FAA approval: Page A-9 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Update Noise Contours Annually. In order to monitor compliance with the avigation easement noise level limit in measures 3 and 4 above, it is recommended that the County of Monroe update the Key West International Airport noise contours annually for comparison with the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. In its 1999 Record of Approval, the FAA approved this measure with no additional verbiage. Current Status: On September 3, 2020, the FAA provided AIP Grant 3-12-0037-061-2020 which included funding for preparation of an update to the Noise Exposure Maps. The updated Noise Exposure Maps are included in this report. The following verbiage (or similar verbiage as applicable) was included in the ROA for several of the measures described above (i.e., LU-1, LU-2, LU-6, PM-1, PM-3, PM-4, PM-6, PM-7, and PM- 8), so rather than repeating it, it is included below. FAA Order 5100.38 sets forth guidance on the administration of the Airport Improvement Program. Its applicability or use by the FAA, in the context of a Part 150 study, is for making funding eligibility determinations when evaluating Sponsor project funding applications. The actual project or program area eligible for FAA funding is determined by the FAA at the time the Sponsor submits each grant application. FAA funding can only be used for structures that meet FAA funding eligibility criteria at the time of the grant application. This does not preclude the Airport Sponsor from using local funds to mitigate structures that FAA determines are ineligible for FAA funding. A.3 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR THAT DO NOT REQUIRE FAA APPROVAL OM-1 Voluntary use of Ground Power Units when time and safety permit It is recommended that aircraft make voluntary use of available Ground Power Units (GPUs) in place of the on-board aircraft Auxiliary Power Units (APUs)when time and safety permit. The use of GPUs may reduce ground noise associated with the operation of the airport and will reduce air emissions and fuel usage by aircraft. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout. OM-2 Continue use of designated aircraft run-up locations It is recommended that Key West International Airport continue use of the designated run-up locations. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout and in the Airport Facility Directory. Page A-10 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION OM-3 Voluntary use of intersection departures on Runway 09 It is recommended that aircraft departing from Runway 09 use an intersection departure at Taxiway C, safety, weather and aircraft performance permitting. The use of the Taxiway C intersection departure will reduce departure noise at noise sensitive locations west of Runway 09. Current Status: During the development of the pilot handout the Ad-Hoc Committee decided not to include this measure on the pilot handout. OM-4 Continue use of a wide variety of flight paths on approach to Runway 09 It is recommended that smaller aircraft continue to use a variety of flight paths during daytime hours as they approach to land on Runway 09. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout. OM-5 Voluntary southerly helicopter arrival and departure tracks It is recommended that rotary wing aircraft(helicopters)depart and arrive to the south to avoid low overflights of noise sensitive land uses directly north of the airport. The helicopters have the ability to safely operate at altitudes below those at which the Naval Air Station Key West(NASKW)aircraft are transitioning through the airspace, and as a voluntary measure, would not apply to the "first responder" helicopter operations that occur at KWIA. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout. OM-6 Adherence to voluntary practices for air tour and aerial advertising flights It is recommended that pilots of all air tour and/or aerial advertising flights adhere to the voluntary practices set forth in FAA AC 91-36D and/or the Community Operational Sensitivity standards included in the "Aerial Media Code of Conduct." Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout. OM-7 Continue voluntary avoidance of direct flight over Key West by the Sea Condominiums by pilots of air tours and aerial advertising flights It is recommended that KWIA continue to discourage pilots of air tours and aerial advertising flights from flying directly over Key West by the Sea Condominiums. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout. OM-8 Continue voluntary use of noise abatement arrival and departure procedures It is recommended that KWIA continue to encourage pilots to use the voluntary National Business Aircraft Association (NBAA) close-in noise abatement departure procedure. Further, it is recommended that Visual Flight Rule(VFR)aircraft continue the voluntary use of specific departure procedures requiring maintaining runway heading until reaching the airport boundary. In addition, Page A-11 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION it is recommended that the appropriate arriving and departing aircraft use voluntary propeller and power adjustments, as safety allows. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included on the pilot handout and in the Airport Facility Directory. OM-9 Continue voluntary curfew of aircraft activity between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. It is recommended that KWIA continue to encourage pilots to observe the voluntary curfew on aircraft activity between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Current Status: This measure has been implemented and is included in the Airport Facility Directory. LU-8 Work with the City of Key West to adopt policies to encourage compatible development The Airport Sponsor and the City of Key West agreed to work together to adopt policies to encourage compatible development around the Key West International Airport. The proposed policies would require new (or substantial improvement to existing) noise-sensitive structures located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour to incorporate noise attenuation measures to achieve appropriate outdoor-to-indoor Noise Level Reduction (NLR). These measures can be incorporated into the design and construction of certain types of buildings, such as homes, schools, hospitals, and churches. For sites that fall between the DNL 65-and 70-dB contours, the recommended NLR is a minimum of 25 dB. For sites that fall between the DNL 70- and 75-dB contours, the recommended NLR is a minimum of 30 dB. Current Status: The Director of Airports and Airport Noise Program Coordinator met with members of the Planning Department on June 14, 2016 to discuss airport noise planning. It was suggested to the City Planning staff that we could develop Acoustical Building Requirements to provide guidance on the products (e.g., windows and doors) that should be used to achieve the required NLR. PM-2 Continue holding meetings of Monroe County's Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise It is recommended that Monroe County and KWIA continue holding meetings of the Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise. The Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise has been a valuable forum for interacting with the public and disseminating information about KWIA's noise program. Ad-Hoc Committee meetings provide the public with an opportunity to express their viewpoints, ideas and concerns about aircraft noise resulting from aircraft operations to and from Key West International Airport. Current Status: The Ad-Hoc Committee currently meets four times each calendar year. Meeting schedule, agendas, and minutes are posted on the airport's website at https:Heyw.com/noise- concerns. Page A-12 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION PM-5 Subscribe to WhispertrackTM to facilitate distribution of voluntary noise abatement procedures It is recommended that KWIA purchase a subscription to WhispertrackTM to facilitate distribution of voluntary noise abatement procedures. Current Status: Since its approval in 2015, the Sponsor has not implemented the measure. A.4 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR IN THE 1999 NCP APPROVED BY THE FAA LU-3 Provide Noise Insulation in Exchange for Avigation Easements A program for noise insulation of existing noncompatible structures is recommended for noncompatible single-family dwellings (and multi-family dwellings of four units or less) within the DNL 65+dB contour of the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, With Program Implementation, in exchange for an avigation easement. Priority should be given first to homeowners located within the DNL 75 dB contour, then to homeowners located within the DNL 70 dB contour, and finally to homeowners located within the DNL 65 dB contour. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those projected for the year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. Eligible homeowners will be given the option of participating in either this program or the purchase program in Measure 4 below. If funding is not adequate to implement both programs simultaneously, this program will be offered first. A program for noise insulation of noncompatible structures is also recommended for Key West High School. At the time when the high school is being renovated, measures to achieve a Noise Level Reduction (NRL) of 30 dB should be incorporated into the design and construction of all classrooms, libraries, offices, and other rooms for which noise insulation is specifically justified because of the substantial and disruptive effect of aircraft noise. 1999 FAA Action: Approved LU-4 Purchase Homes, Provide Noise Insulation, then Resell with Easements A program to purchase existing homes, provide noise insulation, then resell the homes with avigation easements us recommended for noncompatible single-family dwellings (and multi-family dwellings of four units or less) within the DNL 65+ dB contour of the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, With Program Implementation. Priority should be given first to homeowners located within the DNL 75 dB contour, then to homeowners located within the DNL 70 dB contour, and finally to homeowners located within the DNL 65 dB contour. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those projected for the year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. Eligible homeowners will be given the option of participating in either this program or the noise insulation program in Measure 3 above. If funding is not adequate to implement both programs simultaneously, Measure 3 will be offered first. 1999 FAA Action: Approved Page A-13 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION LU-5 Update Noise Contours Annually In order to monitor compliance with the avigation easement noise level limit in measures 3 and 4 above, it is recommended that the County of Monroe update the Key West International Airport noise contours annually for comparison with the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, Without Program Implementation. 1999 FAA Action: Approved LU-6 Rezone Vacant Parcels It is recommended that the County of Monroe direct a written request to the City of Key West to rezone two vacant parcels to prevent noncompatible development. One parcel, on the southwest corner of Flagler Avenue and 11t" Street (Parcel ID#65100.000000)would be rezoned from single family residential development(SF)to an airport noise compatible land use zoning such as limited commercial (LC). Another parcel on South Roosevelt Boulevard (Parcel I D#65090.0001 00)would be rezoned from coastal low-density residential (LDR-C) to an airport noise and public safety compatible land use zoning such as limited commercial (LC). 1999 FAA Action: Approved LU-7 Acquire Vacant Parcels It is recommended that the vacant parcel on the southwest corner of Flagler Avenue and 11 t"Street (Parcel ID#65100.000000) be acquired to prevent noncompatible development if the City of Key West does not rezone the parcel to an airport noise compatible land use zoning. 1999 FAA Action: Approved under 14 CFR Part 150 with respect to the described vacant land within the DNL 65 dB contour where it can be demonstrated that the property is in imminent danger of being developed non-compatibly and local controls are insufficient to prevent that development. Mitigation with respect to new noncompatible development that is allowed to occur on this property is outside the parameters of this Part 150 approval. However, the FAA would encourage local government to exercise its prerogative to change the zoning to a compatible use prior to development. LU-8 Establish Compatible Land Use Zoning Establishment of airport noise compatible land use zoning and public safety compatible land use zoning is recommended, as required by Florida Statutes Chapter 163 and 333. The County of Monroe will seek the cooperation of the City of Key West to establish airport noise compatible land use zoning and public safety compatible land use zoning. 1999 FAA Action: Approved Page A-14 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION A.5 MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT SPONSOR IN THE 1999 NCP DISAPPROVED BY THE FAA OM-1 Conduct a Part 161 analysis of an access restriction prohibiting the operation of non-Stage 3 jet aircraft weighing less than 75,000 pounds at the airport. An FAR Part 161 analysis is recommended to further study an access restriction prohibiting the operation of non-Stage 3 private/corporate jet aircraft weighing less than 75,000 pounds maximum gross weight at Key West International Airport to reduce existing noncompatible land uses and impacted populations. The access restriction to be studied includes a transition program that would initially prohibit such aircraft operations between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Two years later, all such operations would be prohibited from operating at the airport. This access restriction is not being recommended as an operational noise abatement measure at this time. The access restriction is recommended for further study, a Part 161 analysis, and integration into a Part 150 update. 1999 FAA Action: Disapproved for purposes of Part 150. With full implementation of the land use measures in this NCP, the airport operator can accomplish 100 percent compatible land uses within the DNL 65dB contour. The proposal to perform a FAR Part 161 study is not considered to be an eligible noise project under Part 150 because it does not meet criteria described in FAA's policy statement issued in the Federal Register on September 16, 1996. More specifically, the Part 161 proposed study does not meet Part 150 approval criteria of reducing noncompatible land uses beyond achievements gained by the nonrestrictive measures that are approved in this NCP. This disapproval for purposes of Part 150 does not preclude the airport operator from pursuing a Part 161 analysis outside the scope of the Part 150 process. OM-2 Conduct an FAR Part 161 analysis to further study an access restriction prohibiting aircraft from operating at the airport between the hours of midnight and 6:00 a.m. A FAR Part 161 analysis is recommended to further study an access restriction prohibiting aircraft from operating at Key West International Airport between the hours of midnight and 6:00 a.m. to reduce neighborhood disturbance during these hours. This access restriction is not being recommended as an operational noise abatement measure at this time. The access restriction is recommended for further study, a Part 161 analysis, and integration into a Part 150 update. 1999 FAA Action: Disapproved for purposes of Part 150. With full implementation of the land use measures in this NCP, the airport operator can accomplish 100 percent compatible land uses within the DNL 65 dB contour. The proposal to perform a FAR Part 161 study is not considered to be an eligible noise project under Part 150 because it does not meet criteria described in FAA's policy statement issued in the Federal Register on September 16, 1996. More specifically, the Part 161 proposed study does not meet Part 150 approval criteria of reducing noncompatible land uses beyond achievements gained by the nonrestrictive measures that are approved in this NCP. This disapproval for purposes of Part 150 does not preclude the airport operator from pursuing a Part 161 analysis outside the scope of the Part 150 process. Page A-15 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION A.6 HISTORY AND STATUS OF THE NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM The FAA's Record of Approval (ROA)for the 1999 NCP approved the following recommendation: "A program for noise insulation of existing noncompatible single-family dwellings (and multi-family dwellings of four units or less) within the DNL 65+ dB contour of the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, in exchange for an avigation easement. Priority should be given first to homeowners located within the DNL 75 dB contour, then to homeowners located within the DNL 70 dB contour, and finally to homeowners located within the DNL 65 dB contour. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those projected for the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map. Eligible homeowners will be given the option of participating in either this program or the purchase program described below. If funding is not adequate to implement both programs simultaneously, this program will be offered first. A program for noise insulation of noncompatible structures is also recommended for Key West High School. At the time when the high school is being renovated, measures to achieve a Noise Level Reduction (NLR) of 30 dB should be incorporated into the design and construction of all classrooms, libraries, offices, and other rooms for which noise insulation is specifically justified because of the substantial and disruptive effect of aircraft noise." On October 5, 2000, the FAA approved the Policies & Procedures for the Noise Insulation Program (NIP), including the Phasing Plan for Phases 1 through 7. Figure A.3 shows the Program Mitigation Area that was approved in the year 2000, based on the Year 2003 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map. The County of Monroe began implementing the NIP in 2000, as federal funding was provided through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). On December 12, 2004,the President of the United States signed into law the Vision 100-Century of Flight Authorization Act of 2003, Public Law 108-176 (Vision 100). Vision 100 extended AIP funding through September 30, 2007. Vision 100 generally amended Title 49, United States Code (U.S.C.), to prohibit AIP funding for noise mitigation outside the DNL 65 dB contour. On July 21, 2005, the FAA made the determination that Phases 6 and 7, and one block of Phase 5 were no longer eligible for participation in the NIP, because of the provision included in Vision 100, and the fact that these parcels were not within the current DNL 65 dB contour, as documented by the annual noise contour updates. This accounted for a total of 110 homes in the initial analysis of these areas. The FAA indicated that these parcels could be reconsidered at a later date, if subsequent noise contours show that the DNL 65 dB contour impacts these homes. The 2005 Noise Contour Update was completed in February 2007. The 2005 DNL 65 dB contour included the area formerly designated as Phase 6 of the NIP, as well as a few additional homes along Riviera Drive that were not previously included in Phase 6. The FAA agreed to include the recommended 61 homes in Page A-16 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Phase 6, and the 11 additional homes on Riviera Drive not previously included, and provided funding to design the NIP modifications. Figure A.4 depicts the homes that that the FAA approved as Phase 6 based on the 2005 Noise Contour Update. The 2008 NEMs were accepted by the FAA on August 27, 2008. The 2008 DNL 65 dB contour included the area formerly designated as Phase 7 of the NIP, primarily located on Linda Avenue, Government Road, and Flagler Avenue. The FAA agreed to include the recommended 45 homes in Phase 7 and provided funding to design the NIP modifications. Figure A.5 depicts the homes from the original Phase 7 that were re-included in the NIP based on the 2008 NEM Update. All seven phases of the "original" NIP were completed by June 2010 and included the insulation of 295 homes. Forty-one (41) of the eligible homes did not participate, for a variety of reasons. Some of the homes were in foreclosure and the banks or mortgage companies would not allow the house to be included. In other cases, homeowners were ill or were experiencing other personal situations at the time and chose not to participate.A few just did not want to be bothered.Table A.1 provides the breakdown of these homes by phase and year completed. Figure A.6 depicts the 295 homes that were insulated in the "original" NIP. TABLE A.1 NUMBER OF HOMES INSULATED IN THE "ORIGINAL" NIP, BY PHASE PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TOTAL #OF HOMES 25 25 50 57 62 72 45 336 ELIGIBLE NUMBER OF HOMES 21 22 38 54 57 68 35 295 COMPLETED YEAR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 87.8% COMPLETED Source: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, 2022 The 2013 Existing Condition and 2018 Future Condition NEMs were accepted by the FAA on December 197 2013. The NCP Update was approved by the FAA on March 12, 2015. The FAA's Record of Approval for the 2015 NCP approved the following recommendation: It is recommended that owners of noncompatible dwelling units and certain other noise sensitive structures located within the DNL 65+dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM be offered the opportunity to participate in a Noise Insulation Program (NIP). The NIP shall include noncompatible single- and multi- family dwelling units located within the DNL 65+ dB noise contour of the 2013 Existing Condition NEM, which includes Key West by the Sea Condominiums, the Flagler Court Townhomes, as well as the noise sensitive Grace Lutheran Church and School, and the Catholic Charities Facility that are determined to be noncompatible in accordance with FAA Order 5100.38D Appendix R. Page A-17 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Property owners will be required to grant avigation easements to Monroe County in exchange for noise insulation. The avigation easement will remain valid until noise levels exceed those shown on the Year 2013 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map, at which point the easement is no longer binding. 2015 FAA Action:Approved. While the FAA does not require that an easement be given in exchange for sound insulation, the Sponsor has the discretion to impose such a requirement. The measure itself need not be tied specifically to the 2013 NEM. If NEMs are updated in the future, without an NCP update, this measure would be applicable to eligible structures within the 65+ dB contour of any future FAA accepted NEMs determined to accurately reflect the airport's operations at the time of the request for FAA funding. The Sponsor shall seek FAA approval of the final language of any avigation easement(s) acquired under this measure prior to execution of such easement(s). Implementation began later in 2015. The FAA required that the four(4)single-family homes within the DNL 70 dB noise contour that didn't participate in the "original" NIP be offered another opportunity to participate in the first phase of the implementation. Implementation at KWBTS was broken into several phases, spanning several years from 2016 through 2023. One (1)of the four(4)single-family homes in the DNL 70 dB noise contour chose to participate and was included in the first phase. By May 2023, a total of 296 out of 336 eligible single-family homes and 185 out of 206 eligible condominiums will have participated in the residential noise insulation program. This will result in a participation rate of almost 90% at Key West by the Sea and just over 88% for the single-family homes. Table A.2 provides the breakdown of KWBTS condominiums by phase and year completed. Figure A.7 depicts the KWBTS condominiums that participated in the NIP. Figure A.8 depicts the 296 single-family homes that participated in the NIP. TABLE A.2 NUMBER OF KWBTS CONDOMINIUMS INSULATED IN THE NIP, BY PHASE BLDG. B, BLDG. B, BUILDING BLDG.A, BLDG.A FINAL PHASE FLOORS FLOORS C PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE TOTAL 1-2 3-6 NUMBER OF 6+ CONDOS 21 44 76 31 28 206 ELIGIBLE cleanup NUMBER OF CONDOS 17 32 65 28 27 16 185 COMPLETED YEAR 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 90% COMPLETED Sources: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, 2022, THC, 2022 Page A-18 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION A.7 REFERENCES Approval of noise compatibility program, Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 64 F.R. 27848 (1999, May 21). https://www.federairegister.gov/documents/1999/05/21/99-12952/approval-of- noise-compatibility-program-key-west-international-airport-key-west-fl Approval of noise compatibility program update, Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida, 80 F.R. 18491 (2015, April 6). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/06/2015- ter.gov/documents/2015/04/06/2015- 07732/approval-of-noise-compatibility^prog ram-update-key-west-international-airport-key-west- florida Federal Aviation Administration. (1999, May 7). Record of approval 14 CFR Part 150 Noise compatibility program: Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida. https://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/airport noise/part 150/states/fl/media/roa florida 050 799. df Federal Aviation Administration. (2015, March 11). Record of approval 14 CFR Part 150 Noise compatibility program:Key West International Airport, Key West, Florida. https://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/airport noise/part 1 50/states/fl/m ed i a/roa-fl o rid a-key- west-2015031 west-20150311.pdf Noise exposure map notice; Receipt of noise compatibility program revision and request for review, Key West International Airport, Key West, FI. 63 F.R. 66625 (1998, December 2) https://www.federalregis�gov/documents/1998/12/02/98-32133/noise-exposure-map-notice- receipt-of-noise-compatibility-program-revision-and-request-for-review-key Noise exposure map notice; Receipt of noise compatibility program revision and request for review, Key West International Airport, Key West, FI. 63 F.R. 66837 (1998, December 3). https://www.federalreg iq ster.gov/documents/1998/12/03/98-32192/noise-exposure-map-notice- receipt-of-noise-compatibility-program-revision-and-request-for-review-key Noise exposure map notice, Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 73 F.R. 53319 (2008, September 15). https://www.federairegister.gov/documents/2008/09/15/E8-21185/noise- exposure-map-notice-key-west-international-airport-key-west-fl Page A-19 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise exposure map notice; Key West International Airport, Key West, FL, 78 F.R. 79061 (20137 December 27). https://www.federalre_ isq ter.gov/documents/2013/12/27/2013-31075/noise- exposure-map-notice-key-west-international-airport-key-west-fl URS Corporation. (2000). Key West International Airport Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program, Noise Insulation Program, Policies and Procedures. Monroe County, Florida. URS Corporation. (2007c, February). Key West International Airport Part 150 Study, 2005 Noise Contour Update. Monroe County, Florida. URS Corporation. (2008). Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. URS Corporation. (2013). Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation for the Part 150 Study, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. URS Corporation. (2015). Noise Compatibility Program for the Part 150 Study, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. URS Greiner. (1999). Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program, Key West International Airport. Monroe County, Florida. Page A-20 Q J Oa Z C i ,a) O },p Ln M O O E p- WO � U7 I n ' n a0") OVJy AV Jy tL r lu P i z E L a"�O 7- 0 O f� +� � C ifS O " L %�� U 'a -6 = f �veaiairam✓ r o,,,, Y O C 0- C O +� `,�t�,; � t a-J �� j � L U 0) O i O C) ( C o. I V d1n f Z O (0 C L P 1 } 4-1 A U CE 0 o� O •^ C •� is 1 p s O•• C 0� C -Q �/V J In 4-d O O O IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiII�ifl��ull aO OC) -- �N in • r �" a ry�( ( ` muuuuumiVuum fi. W O +- C 4' O Ln d .. uy +� C �; r1Ir C c� s f o Ln O 6 d l J cIy !C U Oig [I7 11 r ❑ •U O 0� ! r `%wiy ( I Jf % S cry C r ' a-J Q� S O a—' C �, C Ccs L +, 4-1 Cn ' C U a-J (U C j C O .^ J v v C: � , C O O OJ QU L ', > iC � �P J ( ;i�G% i J� ( F;�� 7 _ 0� C O '� r �til�i ' uuiim� u �`'� Ln ra U o � V m or- or- ca a3 L Ln >% D 0 E E 5 L °� a 1° Z Q ca z caL _ +^� -v Q ° C C � a M a❑ L" o � �❑L L~U a ❑w L L a) C O � .On Q o a ) a Q (A z m CL co > Q)Q 0 Ln 'E U 4-- 4-J Ln 0 a; (a CL Ln z CL Qa O L >Q L E 4--1 Q 3 L � L 3 ca Qa _ ca L +� a .� � CO Q U ° J v ra ° + a a ❑ a O >% ❑ L 4-J ❑ C L . L v1 �r or.. + - Q l7 � ` a] L. � 4- a � a03 3 • U0 sn E -w L a-J L C M to > U Q} Ia C W •C ree -0 (U LC: 0 n. .� � /1 L �J o� r •r Z +' •} O 0 U L a3 a L -v a •L a s .,� •� o r E a O -O ca to L cn 7 C J a) C ca O L ff� L .r Source: Key West International Airport, Noise Compatibility Program for the Part 150 Study, March 12,2015. Prepared by: URS Corporation and Deborah Murphy Lagos and Associates FIGURE A.1 Page A-21 Q r, ! l r M;. Ir �f A� r Id r UU r � 2 Ir�ray+, ),.�� j�1��; � �� I(' I• r ,'ll�r�"' I I` U IIIIII IUNIVIVI <�/,,��iii'�ri1',✓/rig /� % �,),,� M r n a r r, mw �,l/r ��,,,,�� /� ,.,r!�//��/ a �":, 1. a :,,< r�•.. �,, r I I r ,I a Mp n m . W r ' Cn LU k r s �r rt I " n ,*F y � , ft��(f I uuuuuuuuuuuuuu VVV UIII uuuuul III III�i�''' � Voo ollllf W LU Vl � V1°yuuvvv W'PNB, I.. m ! O CNm�I sill � uoltl � u �I ly� t.,ii,�I I r� y /�G f� ,/ �du a ul �,,..� �Ian r 0n�lelV^�, A W II 1 wlr w,0 f/Y/�,/N 1/// �7q 'U y, LU LU qq , z I I I., ///, ,U ru/ ,' !,r I u i �` W mim 6 t i I rl II O ull Y d 14 � IIIIIII I IIII IIIIIIIIIIII I q I I IIIlullllll°II°II um G r` � �v I ��ul. III m uu i uuu uui, r r Z rA U f1 rr0 " � LU 0 T) �- i � Q o l O OLL f/ f , 1 i ,r, J r, O II r/r G'��,/�j� Iml�ip�lll flirt I II No I � � Hw� mIIIIIIIV ,gym � u �, IIm �h nUU '�.. ullo � IIVII Source: Key West International Airport, Noise Compatibility Program for the Part 150 Study, March 12,2015. Prepared by: URS Corporation and Deborah Murphy Lagos and Associates FIGURE A.2 Page A-22 MAKIN 180d 8 IVIVRO I i,VN 8.....3iN1 W0440,Jd uOReIrl's-ull O'll Opljo,fi-JeWIPWO J'Ofila I J I L mjca Z III Lu it z z % P IIIIIIII O"M 'Ito "M ui gas Lu ui V. ul ,•_,,. �� ry„., fir;�� rif/v i�/,,,, j� Lu ,.�'"°' � �a°' ram,"'� ',�"'`, ��. "� O 'NI ui 0 U � !Z�t :t: C) IMP CV) 7 LL Lu a) 0 u O Lu o 0 LL O % Abl Ilk I ell, ku Lu Cn 0 0- 'Ile �_7 4-0 Co 'W, 7" ry41 ::wj X, 60 VK U) 1,111 n Lo —IN, 77 FIGURE lill", IS ,..... o A.3 0 Page A-23 180 a #II V IV NO 1I Ntl M, WI a s y;� 0 ONV `S VX 0 WV'80,08d SI' m I.LS3MA3AuiSI � I MION3HI 80.A,0N[SVHd ,, I „ ...... '..... ,. W Q � CL r o, p �� O y° w — J � V N I a i I r r G ;/ / 7 r G / ; Y r I� Z I" �V liiiul% V i� ; G 9 V uuuuull S mu II , uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum ��..� V uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu� .w�I i l l l l l l l l l li ilYl��uuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III �I, W w� � �I 4 r4 , ; Lu p„ „*�"� � Q � u :•, ":, a� � �I I!'I li' II I I �f�•�� ; ,' INdm iCw-' , m^� Iuuul uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuq„ ; Ij �iii IIIII rL I I w III q ' e M U W � ,, W� O w p I f, u M-' nnnnnnm �I � i I r � l i ii/ ✓%% Lu Cnr / lip" 00-� W "" Lo ul I CD .......... U W� Lu LL a,5' Lu1 Ir• `, N°� a m"^ wl�/l i J"' r,,y GILI V J . Lo 0 0 0 w ' Lu Cn 0, M. � l� M LL Q LLI C: 0 Co r L K O t Ili U MITI m� ro� O U ' N w � � �� " + r u' IYi m/ I FIGURE a Q A.4 N 0— Page A-24 il`,.." I". o '. a RY p miSM 38n off. »v" � I 6 IIN � �I b Z O 'I'll 0� F Lu 111".Al N tl N d a N rIr ...... �k �" � pN M. � P� � .....n I N �I��w� �� lif■ .. a �, " �P � � tlw I.r N ° ....'° �"� r tlr �� '��, ...... ...... .. ell, N, �Inw ........................ ............... f al, 0 // W ....... "'�,� ,,-+ �rk i„ �( �Ui /�or9;l"!,%��//��jf r ° W ie,js, a a., �ua+�r., »imn u aN .,�� Nw W �i»l^V^+i,�l 7��(;/i/�(r ylUlft�„� '� %✓��/fwr�fN�^ �,� � I ��,..� Y ww'v �V �p r:� �I! �f�'� ✓�?�rt� i irra��utl�j/��r/��i d e� �� ry ��r '' w✓., IW. �Iq��u „,u�w,,. i „;N>'a i ��jvoa9�lG r,,:.��/�, „��u rq l%��jl� 7��/��„ b... �r I �. � ..; �..� I r"p � Y� l� N"''�;��f//��'(NwG�°` wr',s'r,G��%'�,, � ��Y» �r v;%/�%•. 4 � wP+"" YY� �w SIN �m (� q �0' �N d+i o aA�,a f,N� �� ,,r/��/!,,,.: �� r O � rr,:. p:N"C r�aV a 14 `Wa i � W � ,r >t�///��/l, w� �;�i�//i�(��i ip �' f 'p m N'N �. (I r. / J /� //afw..q r," ,'1 + w ,r r,� � iV�N Vi W I�i� qq��qq � k� �//�/��ru �oyg� 'l%/�i //�i 1 �rw`" �,^r' .::r•,�,:. f!-Vw,V. G 41E V 4 _Nli�^Ul. �.I a,, %,aa ear»!;/Ila Mi�� w,:uw....:. . w C� �v.i P:w �i.im, llu' 4i Ny I��m�b Ifl'V��r ,�r��,II� pub, ,P � V �N6/d��"�;i,ii��ii ✓%��%%�!� s � �j ii......1 Of14 � 'I6,„ N ir.a li qVir ,,� X,,,w 06r„ P� V,�� . m�J�r w, �I ��W±�� »�r�m'�u �(�,v��, a dr "Nru� � '1 0 » lip N°v, PPP a�,,r4Y, u'V rNNtl wG,. a. �b //i; l%/ lam,% .,u ,,,,,, .. '..u,.r„ °� i % j w N N w iu ,,,�N r,»„,w.�:.;,».„, �� %fi� �I:�VI � N'•- � u ➢tl I u N T6iN Nll � �^IN Np�I�. .r- �o� L v,y, ��;..' rJ�r� I�� rt.n w�� • 'N � w,,, .��,,�ww Nrrr" J, G ^ ri..bM tla rr: au WI.:,�, RJWu'uu (a NJ WI/j f�yl ', ,.. �:✓i,.� " "r,V.^ � op{ ,, 4ui ' m a d nn, �, , w�m�a I �, IfY ,Nlw�� 4�i�..„,�,.�V I �i fi 'tl��V �"I,�....I�IV��4 �.,,,,, .�Nw�:,lr"w� tin.,,:,„... u �i g �Cw r d W N ,N�w,„rw,. a uu ,_n:.,V'& II r�wXlv,.: 0b�.. r� ul ��,r � ,�� y:�N� ern• I;, i � ,. �. a,a »'' fill w.r �l wr�w �` II� %'„,, "�,! pp B N 4 Lu .: � � yl ��r� „ u� �i J� .�� n r�i � �b w w Q Nl v N I aw '' Il�Iw � �" � r�t w• ro .�� II 9� �� w � u� �w'sw � � r»� �Pn, �''1 UUU p ,w«lg�% "° w°^'r fI �;✓��, � 0w � "i Vy wyW A wul 4 .�" m � 9 � a ti � r"�P wrt Nu "��p,l ��' VI U Nil �" � V ww i�� Q" ��P• a �� u rPa UV � l�"IV N� gyi r yN �w V Np 4 Na d V � B wLu4 G6 tl.ww�p kk N D1r+ �Q a»1Y IW' P IJ M W u � w o N�p .,r«w,, m Vim, a I a h y G wkV mm N^w. oP� Wt V .1 "il Q l ua ry N .n,,.Y, p�� y2 ,.�r• ( wuvyMi M TM�::w,,�,_, �i Z N,r r' N 7 N0 r g Lu 11 1 W �4� N fil 0ff� b N g N w m tl wrwN Q g O�I u ,W„� V' Pm�?a,. R u„ r'✓' ,J!y N�m' di NM L „rw w,� I"X v, IX p „n,„�.,wf 'wn. � AM ,e �,� r�_,�� :.ram" M 4 r {�w��'� 6�Nry O I,vry,, ..,,.�,«r u b niii�, , V" ��% (M N�'1 N41w"' hew N �m I. � "� �r �, w � p-� „n+ww Iw° .,,'� WIC'. ,.��,„.... ,::::.�v .„, "'�V�I b,:.."'.. , r'w 0 ' w r"'^Ne, Py . .,wlr;� ��/,:1��fG a l�w y. W m �i p N W� o:- Wiw,..ate ✓ % i /a� �' ,ao�'! r:,;�� wJ .:�r� ."�".° wr 9tl p..II.�� „„,.,,, "� � ..,..:�..�,� N � w en:�b �^�,�,.r w,v.er,: b "D 9, f��/r..�(�r� �,��.,w„m® ,yr ,�' ,»,r° vv�yf w �r� .:� war .: ��f �IVV �,Y ��w I�r~ uw ^ M,r , ,, vw IPo��✓ � airr' lon w v... 6p .,�,::„I.,w V M�N.W„��.,..+..��: w ",w,w v „i N✓„ " .%- /r"gin- �I"'„;j'y� �n,k ww' � af"n .�..� .,r"r: .,>m,w:�,�,n.,,�rr~+ .»,, f,,,W,,,,, :»,fir,mr, ��, �°m,�v+.� un A';i�l,��Nii��%/✓ ,�" y v �i i ��N a yr �� vW ;lay. .,„.. µ� " r,. naww� ,tl(","� 'pb, i ""� �,....">Ni,/r,' �.N. CO iW � i U. �u v�""�� 1��- .;w�u � is��°� .,; w Vi "„V,�, "4,r. ""� rN q .flw„ ,F �i r v��. .:� �,,. ,::v..:r.: „„.. r. �n,; ., ' �o:n., / Jf� ,� p a� n�..�' "e ^� h,�, - w B �.,.. B v N m H" w „.„ *" r N //G�.�✓o;li'," r//,;: r/I IL' ..,� .,w:w ymw.. : � ,v,„. ,+ �, v w'N N °��r� i+�Mv'"w ^�^«�"N a w'' ». N,u .w„m'' " �i%w /I/l/i/ SIT, L OO nu' '� r �wu u r M w W ,, �.I. i .a� /, / �a� ,:mow- �,wow @ �,�,:�m mw mn ,w uM"„:�rw ,� N wv�„°.'. na„'J m.W. ,,�. ��i� w f1w >'. ,, „�r^......w'. n, w�» dd w.�' ,,:,. u,,,'N'1�." .a w:�� v al,../la .I. /.r ✓w ,., , J;o��.,. .,: ,W a" ,� . ,r,. rN, N„��.� rtw ,*u" .:w �,.„N d' r�.� wNO,film ni f,.l%Oaf are;. :_�� ,yl,.1a.`✓,li /,r:�:�r-.��. rt'9,. .4'9. ^'R.. �iiii o�� :,uw,.rww l N dr-°,. £�r ;uN' dir�a''tr�i a n" nw"" I'm �l� ir'w' r:u �"' ./%��, tl �y� a® ,r0)N,'y/�'J/. /0,� .�.,lJ 'M w �il„ � V J 0 ,,» .v »:v N'4r.. ,wk` .I... w+w�p�r 5.,��.^rry� mr' r,"„,w rw "„w vw.w�i�rw �,r»'Nr nr,° ( ui;;1/iria� ///J",: � ,, v w n ,'h�i,w� ,, �N N w °n u� � „�°ru '�wvu �i r �re.rw'u� ,w^ Nu��„"'I wry„ �m��y w' �,ra r q�§V X a a I I IP � N M ^ ' (V ? Lu F wNW'N »' ilV^N �r �"� Tn Cn Nill"k wIII r" O 0 a�^Vl, � � �,w'w `b 111 " WwW ru Q w, a „;,,m ww„F w w,w�� Yr R��w�+Nui w „:�m',rw"'�v,„yE .rr ,,o „'-•'r v r,�' iy�a, aNwr -.,p r,' w� w a {i �Nuv� Mom! IIIw °.. .,`' ..i�y,,+''"ww ,:nu �tl ��,:n�4� �'' Q.O ;:�rllWw�� o''Wli. ,„w +,r�' liww »r ,» 4 ykWw�W ffi � u:�,�"`„n '"". i 0 J� I'II r ,:��" % a.m .1 I, 4,,"`• N, » "' W...0�::�u��. a w, jjl �•-� � �� , ,��`� M:.� I,a ,w Vim..' r ,��N"w'.,' ��,'< m 'ld. ,::w' ai/,:'rcM :.w;, r1,�...,�d .�:w:v. 4. ��:�r !� a"' �. "la r��u W,'�w a„ Q� Ora ' „a", '"'P ,.�) „„ ,.ra✓' "+ ,w,.�^N w��,,rw .,,n iN w ,,,,r i w.,,,, �rJw� `r %^w,w w" y�l ",n' �:.v.N- 'w4 r,�v.�� rw", ""��,'« w„: I' +u.V^q�n"�"�'� »�r' vr, ry �'".r J,�� a ^w.:" er��'��!u�,�'i,� �p��, o�rt» ��NrN ^"��'��Nw'n�,i w,„��" �'a .�; vv�i,: �W�NH � O v a�:-r" , , Y, 'fmvlfr wl µ a--� rnr "Yn%"rvi�;,'°"' '. �,. ,a�:. v�r" �. „. �:,,'.✓,�, ,y„ ""low, ww ��w'^w. a °W,Arr"' M"u� ,✓✓,::°'"��. � N' •O Z3 rvly NVl � +° �� 'o r "wN�� ,v w°v.W�rw Nil" a--i I °I µ�` ° w: r✓w'� .rw`"I�h �v,... r, NI�",��, nr»° ,w,""„ r vrr ,.,+rwi/,�% �rdr; ,. r �a'"��rl°a ti ,»,"w,.,;rw' ��yls" n.� I�,� ,d!. I m w,. %' ', /J%l,r, ,"of l opr ��] �'"•AN �, � � ..':'; W...."r+".� ;' �w r„� '., ,.nv�", ,;,,r„ ,��. ��.�.mh�l a»` rw r�„�w„ rli.: d�/�/C,"��r��/�o4,,J,,.. dYW µl��.,. ��r�' Vii MiN..,��, ,i�,w�� nN , '411 /r„ ;�V �( w I.„,., "�'`m '°p�, I' µm';nvi��,.n "w>✓v'h, ��d„ ,�� II;.N� ,. �;nr"we VI 4 ",,,,'- . �Nui,�.� �„ .:,,��NYi�y��oW i ��^1(,i,;,,� ,n•'- O � 'III r nY' aw "H "v a"r^I I " '''�'Ir�^�h`� r;�'�:�v,. , Sri✓ ,.nr1" „",.,;.., Nw;w"' ,14w;r wn: ,w,- °wIIAe yl f I„, Mw I"r w f N �,1�//µ/ "i l l"w W WV v a �I (n V J as ,»�I Ni M. jNG� �. I.�artq�W,N r,,,.w�` iu�rw�y�"� If, Na?,,:4P' %w,m "m,��»� wyJa�wryr. ry,w��4 v.,,:�.,�„", w"•'ti T,n:�i,, JYIn'n N p pihbM � " µ, 7r l rnN ry w ' p r ""�wu4 "' Na �q r c, d' nµ aW wM"ar 4lNi� 4'"q '"uw64 µv a N ww!" ly W„ d r: Wl ron II auH r d rm N9 lb P° nw.',,Rrl.W ;a .v r,yn� N.,m' �i✓'':�r" nr!�,a, III L.w,.v ,w,ru",A.':r,. r^'b N�rpw i:a�'u n rnnl,r,'rv,, 'r yu.. Q� Zl v:n w°IW v lr w „v, ,,v Ma rr' w+'W, r w,r^u� ",NW W.Vi!a.. „rI,.., r y 70 ,,.��. ,rv""lw,rm. �' ,a�v�. �d' L.:wil ".� „d ,gym+ 'w�i, ",. m'p, W'��,;�' U p.urd „u,. .iv�ai Y 1 ,�ua.v .m ',nm�' .umm,v Nw.X Vo Md,, 44.,.„y�,. ':��.w.rw ,, �,;v L�,rb"a'.. n.,"I �,•:rl"wrr�' u�.mr++„ i,. /�� 1 W '�y b by m,,:•' lrwf i wta r»�r�,, ,V 4,llu^,r N CIO FIGURE d^"fir "'� �,�, r ire ev ";�,rol�My'"Pd 4 vI ;�w u' "ww „„„ w,:. r•,,,�:: �„ w 9 �,:,»: �.�.Y'r' W,�,."+, w v andW "'4 „r w:�. a� n u'ry mww"�'» r,',��: v:. Nw,., hr w... Ylul�"N; °w,✓r" W,aW.�h w>"''',.w.°nN ,,`w,1% w»1MI ^y �N w"Y4:NN, m w°�wrrv�v e A.5 Cu QD ,»:, r wW4 ww bfvn O L IF '.. u::�lH�,nN ay n..,�arn., �" ,„�,b�W ,,.» n.,ul��;�yv ,.,"yU w„�� u ,:v 'Wil IaN I,^ N G, aaV W.` p VJ G L.L � ''W�r fw w" W"4 a � k � u ^w 'N IN,Na Page A-25 ...................... o a je lo-lz, Of jj gll Z Lu 0,10"Imm, g) z wr j" WNW! Off ui Yl`ol LLI L Lu ui Lu J)'A JIM// ISjo is, .............. Yl Lu "44, 01 LO 17' UO W N, Lu FIGURE A.6 ............... 4 . ..... Page A-26 19 O CL 19 R � ' Wa 3: z > o W LU Q z z 09 W H z .......... .......... .......... �M r Z fJJ a--I r-I r-I rl a--I rl ..r-i.. s-i �.-i rl 'r-1' rl r.1 rq N � O O O Q O O ::CJ:: O ©:: O ::::CD::: CDI I O O O O l0 Lf7 rr] rqr I � L!1 . m �•1 rq I m N s I m rl Z / .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ........... .......... N N r.1 r.1 N N ry rv.::: r.� N N Ln Ln u-1 :::txf::: m m qJ O O O O O O O 0.... O O O i I s I s I 0::: O O +' �h Cv] N �--I �f3 :::: m N �--I M N -4 :::m-::: N x--� Q t.......... ........... .......... W °° `� m m m d m m m m m m m m m �O l0 40. O d CD CDC7:: d d d d d CD CD CDr r-1 s i d d d Ln .......... N r-I Lnm N r-I m ry m rq rl Z ........... a d d d d d d d d d d • d d d .......... .......... .......... W V) V) Lf) Lr) Lr) .......... u1 m N up m N m , m ry V♦ .......... Ln L-n Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln L V Ln Ln M1 M1 M1 .••, U a o o O a O d :Ln::: o O O d d o a Ln m N ti--1 ......".... m rq ti--1 m rV �--1 m rq a--1 W iA m c M o CD CD O CD o r .. .r O O ..r : oLu W 0 Ln m rq 0 .,sa. .Ln: m .4:: a r..� r� v U d a • J J J m rV C7 Gd m m i a M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 �5 mO5 M1 M1 M1 O O O O O d p O O O O d :+-{ -4 -4 m d O O Q LO m rq 1-1 kfl Ln 1 m r 4 :::m r•l 1--1 m r•l 1-1 E00 CO 04 00 00 OQ 00 00 00 00 OQ OQ d O O 00 0 00 Z W d d d d d d d d d d d d rV •l N r d d d z (. Ln 14 m C%4 i--I tiC7 Ln m N i--I rn rq rq m rV rl W a io r4 E C) C) CT) � � � a) � C C CT) CT) � �.......... CT) CT) C J d d CDd d d Ln � m rq r-1 k Ln 'Tt m N :::C)::: rV :::i°ti::: r•l a 1 3 rZ z d d d C:;; d d d d Q;:: d d rq rq rq 0;:;;:; ;;; d Ln - O 0 r1 r1 r1 � .r1 r1 r1 r1 � r1 r1 r1 m m - Z U. 14 'qT N r 4 N en CA m C%4 —4 0 M z O LO 00 Sou rce: D eborah Murphy Lagos and Associates,THC,2022 FIGURE A.7 Page A-27 f -"WE /N NOW/ft P Fall, A YA, "mad W/m, J NO/ I A ow, P WI I I 'al 14 /2 ypps vl CL V jwr, AFF/91' A. V ON, J�6 'g o J //0% o", p LIJ K 'al "'o lor Tii I I.Or�;1111 11.140116roib' 1/1 1( )� 1 1 1-11 1/1 ok, Lu 2111 4 IT //R), 4/m/m/33, WV 7, z p Ao / AN JjAl ISO 1101 z J0041 Of ,,q l)Y W 4; AON W j Z A if 10/01 :J# r ,,, , I'll'' 1, j 11 1 N, , * Ill I w P A 4/,/ p/ Id Ilk P/M A I rpgm�g/-�� t 471 T z k/ "/p TIN/I AINA" I ell Lu �l� 3 > V V NOW T/ mo /e, L m 41, 4""'OP" NMI` A 4. PC A, AA 1-0 V ANN Al A zA/1 M/W 4, W, WIN NA Add WWI- W IV' d 'AO/ /All, 0 Iw ;,Ijo lee oxPIP- "o/* a0/1" Or gm 21 4, ME, 4 J# Lu YA /j/ V A RM V l"aw ,Jr, N, A /A 02� V Jill/ /ro Af 0 A.-AI gg 71 K/1 x6o"fI "Mr, A, 4V"I I Ill",I I A 'w ui0 1210 q 'A jpl W, IFF) V & 'X/ A Lu A I A lfrwli l ME',TV, --J M` ICI T V w I MR. f s, try 'h, k Lu I"' /%, la� 'I" 1"W" j� v & 0 ow A4, 0141 P�162 A LU All, NO, ON/M ,/V Ml Cn 11/0 0 A r1I 0 O"r II-0 Nwll/l r%4 j 10 ef y "ellp V) P % J/ idd, w Lu Ilk 2 4-1 b, 'Aft, AffibmAl, OFF 105woh, o a Ik d/d, AS% 11/111, A A/Pov IN/, J01"?1%,fil, g ZONES 0 ll 0 1 1/0 " I X, m al "J" 0", TOM mod P 01 V) A Ad, & 1/1)1 1 q Am, Ln PA/1" U. fff" I I TAX gg 00 r;�,A, Of ommm < _0 9 to go qg, ro A 11WOM omp V) CN IT, L 0 wel fo Ilk, I-Or Am, PON ;Iyy � 11,"11 W, N &- _j im 'WO I"', KII.'HP 0,Vill p ro 1E, IA( A g X141, ZRI, %g x A J/ 0 M A rM, OIL 0 "worm"I I p// 0 ro z rA1/1',/,/,-,0�1 S, p%, 7 UJ 0 D 4�� N 011, 10 gg �,o/(,Nk a 7� 1A W 1 411 1 6 z Z, .......... 4 Al' L) do, /00 m og's, ��Abl lit, 1�/p mim A 0 IM/16 11 IF Azpp/l 'jP g "MY d, 1/1117 11// Z FIGURE I= A.8 Page A-28 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX C SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION C.1 INTRODUCTION Title 14 CFR part 150 §150.21(b) requires that each NEM must be developed and prepared in consultation with FAA regional officials,the officials of the state and of any public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the NEM, and other federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map. This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport, including air carriers and other aircraft operators. Accordingly, the following parties were contacted and requested to provide input as appropriate: • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), o Orlando Airports District Office (ORL ADO), o Southern Region Office of Airports, Planning & Programming Branch (ASO 610) o Air Traffic Organization, Eastern Service Center(ATO) • Naval Air Station Key West, • Florida Department of Transportation, o FDOT Aviation Office o District 6 Aviation Coordinator • Florida State Clearinghouse, Office of Intergovernmental Programs, Department of Environmental Protection • State Historic Preservation Officer, Bureau of Historic Preservation • Bureau of Public Land Administration, Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands • City of Key West o City Manager o Planning Department • Monroe County Administrator, • South Florida Regional Planning Council • Key West Art and Historical Society • Monroe County School District Superintendent • Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Land Authority • EYW Airport Traffic Control Tower Manager • Signature Flight • Key West Seaplane Adventures • Seaplanes in Key West Page C-1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION • Silver Airways • American Airlines • United Airlines • Delta Airlines • Federal Express • Mountain Air Cargo • Ameriflight • Air Adventures • Allegiant Air • Jet Blue Airways Corporation A copy of the letter sent to these consulted parties, as well as the distribution list, are included in this appendix. C.2 RESPONSES TO LETTER/EMAIL TO CONSULTED PARTIES In response to the letter to consulted parties, the following individuals responded acknowledging receipt of the letter/email. Name Representing Robe Valle Air Key West Peter Closi Air Adventures Key West Dr. Julie Ann Floyd Seaplanes in Key West Andrea Haynes Signature Flight Brad Richardson Florida Department of Environmental Protection Chris Stahl Florida State Clearinghouse Isabel Cosio Carballo South Florida Regional Planning Council Bart Vernace Federal Aviation Administration, Orlando Airports District Office C.3 ONGOING COMMUNICATION WITH CONSULTED PARTIES In response to the letter to consulted parties, the following individuals requested to be kept informed of the activities related to the NEM Update. They were placed on an e-mail distribution list and provided advance copies of the Ad-Hoc Committee Agenda Packages. Name Representing Peter M. Green Federal Aviation Administration, Orlando Airport District Office Laura Thornbrugh Delta Airlines, EYW Station Manager Timothy DeBord Delta Airlines, Regional Manager Sarah A. Richardson Allegiant Air, Manager, Airport Affairs Melissa Paul-Leto City of Key West, Planning Department Page C-2 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Karen Taporco Community Planning and Liaison Officer, Naval Air Station Key West C.4 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Because of the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on existing and forecast aviation activity at EYW, a lengthy coordination effort was undertaken concerning the decision about the historical 12-month period of aviation activity to be used to represent the existing condition, as well as the FAA's forecast of future aviation activity for EYW. This coordination effort culminated in a formal request (letter dated June 17 2021) from Monroe County to the FAA to approve the proposed study years for the NEM Update. On June 21, 2021 the FAA informed Monroe County (via email) that the Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) had been removed from their website. On July 14, 2021 the FAA informed Monroe County (via email) that the FAA's 2020 Terminal Area Forecast had been re-posted on the FAA's website and was available for use in developing the Future Condition NEM. Additionally, they did not object to the County's proposal to use actual aircraft operations data for Fiscal Year 2021 to prepare the Existing Condition NEM. Copies of the letter to the FAA(dated June 1, 2021) and the FAA's email response (dated July 14, 2021) are included in this appendix. During the June 2021 Ad Hoc Committee meeting, the Manager of the EYW Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)described the Runway 09 Departure Climb Restriction. Subsequently,the FAA requested additional information in order to evaluate the need to include this procedure in the noise modeling. The Consultant prepared a letter (dated October 26, 2021) to the FAA (on behalf of Monroe County) documenting the screening analysis used to determine whether or not custom, user-defined departure profile should be incorporated into the AEDT model for development of the NEMs, since the handling of aircraft departures in the vicinity of EYW by NAS KW presents a known and unique operating condition. The FAA reviewed the letter and requested a virtual meeting to further discuss the details. A virtual meeting was held on November 18, 2021 with several representatives from the FAA and the Consultant. The decision was that standard profiles would be used to model all aircraft operations for the EYW NEM Update. Copies of the letter to the FAA (dated October 26, 2021) and the Record of Conversation of the virtual meeting (dated November 18, 2021)are included in this appendix. During coordination with the FAA regarding clarification of eligibility for the Noise Insulation Program based on the updated NEMs, it was determined by the FAA that language in the 2015 Record of Approval for the previous NCP Update allows inclusion of eligible structures into an approved Noise Compatibility Plan (NCP), with the intent to accommodate modest changes in the size and shape of the contour over time and the incremental addition of homes or apartment units into the NCP that are newly within the contour. For example, when updated NEMs include some additional homes within the DNL 65 contour. The language does not contemplate or apply to 1) substantially different contours, 2) major modifications and updates to an existing NCP or Noise Insulation Program (NIP), 3) providing the basis for what would essentially be a new NCP, and 4) including areas and/or structures specifically excluded from consideration by the Sponsor in prior NCPs.These types of changes represent conditions that would require an update to the NCP. Since the Las Salinas Condominiums and Ocean Walk Apartments were specifically excluded in previous NCPs, an NCP Update would be required to include them. During the December 2021 Ad Hoc Committee meeting, the Consultant presented information regarding development of the fleet mix and number of operations for the existing condition. A lengthy discussion Page C-3 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION (approximately 15 minutes) took place regarding the use of FlightRadar24 vs OPSNET data. At issue was the large difference in the number of operations reported by OPSNET vs. FlightRadar24 (approximately 20,000 operations). Subsequently, the raw FlightRadar24 data was reanalyzed, and it was discovered that most of the "missing" operations were misidentified as overflights, when in fact they were departures or arrivals. Upon request, the Consultant prepared a letter to the FAA (dated February 17, 2021) requesting the FAA's approval of the proposed method. A document was included with the letter describing the proposed method for developing the fleet mix and number of operations to be used for generating the Existing Condition NEM. The revised fleet mix and number of operations was presented to the Ad Hoc Committee by the Consultant during the March 7, 2022 meeting. The Ad Hoc Committee informally approved the revised results during this meeting. The Consultant revised the document on May 5, 2022 to include additional details regarding the re-analysis of the FlightRadar24 data. Copies of the letter, final attached document, and the FAA's approval are included in this appendix. A preliminary draft of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation was submitted to the FAA for review on July 5, 2022. The FAA's comments were received on August 22, 2022. Subsequently,several of the comments were discussed with the FAA to determine a mutually acceptable resolution. The revised version of the document was made available for public review on September 19, 2022. Coordination with the FAA regarding comments received on the preliminary draft document included a discussion regarding the appropriate year to be used for the existing condition noise contours. The FAA suggested that an analysis be conducted to determine whether or not any significant changes in the number and/or type of aircraft operations had occurred between the 12-month period used to develop the existing condition noise contours and the most recent 12-month period. This analysis was conducted, and it was determined that there had been no significant change. The Consultant prepared a letter documenting the analysis and results. A copy of the letter is included in this appendix. C.5 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH DELTA AIRLINES Upon request, a Regional Manager from Delta Airlines provided information regarding the use of the standing takeoff procedure (i.e., jet engine spool up prior to brake release) by various aircraft types in Delta's fleet at Key West. This request for information was made to all airline representatives, but Delta Airlines was the only one that responded with useful information. Upon request, a Regional Manager from Delta Airlines provided clarification regarding Delta's use of CRJ or EMB (instead of A319) aircraft for their last arrival of the day during Eastern Standard Time. C.6 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE BUREAU OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION Upon request, a Senior Database Analyst from the Florida Department of State — Bureau of Historic Preservation provided cultural resources data for Key West, including Historical Structures Forms from the Florida Master Site File (FMSF), a Cultural Resource Roster for Key West and Stock Island and for Monroe County, GIS files for a Standard Cultural Resources Search by Township-Range-Section for a portion of Key West and Stock Island, FMSF Manuscripts of several historical/cultural resource surveys for Key West and NAS Key West. Page C-4 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION C.7 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER During the June 2021 Ad Hoc Committee meeting, the Manager of the EYW Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) described the Runway 09 Departure Climb Restriction. Subsequent to the meeting, upon request, he provided additional information to assist in the determination of noise modeling assumptions. Upon request, the Manager of the ATCT provided clarification regarding the counting of aircraft operations and their reporting to OPSNET. C.8 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY OF KEY WEST PLANNING DEPARTMENT Upon request, a Planner from the City of Key West provided clarification of jurisdictional boundaries with respect to Monroe County, the City of Key West and the Naval Air Station. C.9 REFERENCES Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, 14 C.F.R.§150 (1984). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter- /subchapter-1/part-150 Page C-5 el vralvMuwoophy LaV*,,e.TAaoc6at LLC DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Tuesday, October 13, 2020 [FIRST NAME] [LAST NAME], [TITLE] [ORGANIZATION] [STREET ADDRESS] [CITY], [STATE] [ZIP] RE: Key West International Airport Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps Update Dear [SALUTATION] [LAST NAME], In compliance with 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners, as owner and operator of the Key West International Airport, is beginning work on an update to their Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs). In accordance with §150.21(b), the NEMs will be developed and prepared in consultation with states, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the map, FAA regional officials, and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map. This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport. This notification is sent pursuant to §150.21(b). The airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Progress reports will be provided to the local community and interested parties throughout the study period at the regularly scheduled Ad Hoc Committee on Noise meetings. These meetings are tentatively scheduled for the following dates in 2020 and 2021. December 1, 2020 March 2, 2021 June 1, 2021 October 5, 2021 December 7, 2021 Note: These dates may change,and all parties will be notified of these changes. The Ad Hoc Committee meets at 2:00 pm in the Harvey Government Center Commission Chambers, located upstairs at 1200 Truman Avenue, Key West. If you would like to be on included on the distribution list for the Ad Hoc Committee agenda packages please provide an e-mail address to deborah.murphv.lagos(ab-qmail.com. 4635 Alisa Circle NE Saint Petersburg,FL 33703 727.631.1553 deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com Vdx"ea1vMu*o1phy LaAg<xk&r Asx�c�ft LLC [FIRST NAME][LAST NAME],[TITLE] [ORGANIZATION] DRAFT DOCUMENT [STREET ADDRESS] SUBJECT TO REVISION [CITY], [STATE][ZIP] Page 2 Written comments may be submitted to the County by mail or email. Mail comments to: Email comments to: Deborah Lagos deborah.murphy.lagos(a)-g mail.com Deborah Murphy Lagos & Associates 4635 Alisa Circle NE Saint Petersburg, FL 33703 The Noise Exposure Maps Report submitted to the FAA for review must be accompanied by documentation describing the consultation accomplished under §150.21(b) and the opportunities afforded the public to review and comment during the development of the maps. One copy of all written comments received during consultation shall be included in the Report. If you have any questions regarding the Key West International Airport's Part 150 NEM Update, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (727) 631-1553 or by e-mail at deborah.murph y�la_ ocoss(b_gmail.com. Sincerely, Deborah Lagos Airport Noise Program Coordinator CC: Richard Strickland, Senior Director of Airports Erick D'Leon, Assistant Director of Airports Beth Leto, Deputy Director, Airport Finance &Administration Peter M. Green, Environmental Specialist, FAA ORL ADO Page C-7 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION The Parties Consulted by the Airport Operator pursuant to 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, §150.21 (b): FAA Officials Bart Vernace, Manager FAA Orlando Airports District Office 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 400 Orlando, FL 32819 Peter M. Green, Environmental Specialist FAA Orlando Airports District Office 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 400 Orlando, FL 32819 Jackie Sweatt-Essick Environmental Protection Program Manager FAA Southern Region Office of Airports 1701 Columbia Ave, Suite 540 College Park, GA 30337 Natasha Durkins, Director FAA ATO, Eastern Service Center 1701 Columbia Ave, Suite 540 College Park, GA 30337 Other Federal Officials that have local responsibility for the area within the DNL 65 dB depicted on the maps Captain Mark Sohaney, Commanding Officer Karen Taporco, Community Planning and Liaison Officer Naval Air Station Key West P.O. Box 9001 Key West, FL 33040-9001 List of Consulted Parties Page C-8 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION State Officials Greg Jones Airspace and Land Use Manager FDOT Aviation Office 605 Suwannee Street, Mail Station 46 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Nick Harwell Airport Planning Manager FDOT Aviation Office 605 Suwannee Street, Mail Station 46 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Brittany Williams-Sanders, District Six Aviation Coordinator Florida Department of Transportation 1000 NW 111 th Avenue, Room 6105 Miami, FL 33172 Chris Stahl, Clearinghouse Coordinator Florida State Clearinghouse Office of Intergovernmental Programs Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Timothy A. Parsons, Ph.D., RPA State Historic Preservation Officer Bureau of Historic Preservation Florida Department of State R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Brad Richardson, Bureau Chief Bureau of Public Land Administration c/o DEP, Division of State Lands 3900 Commonwealth Blvd, MS 100 Tallahassee, FL 32399 List of Consulted Parties Page C-9 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Public and Planning Agencies having jurisdiction within the DNL 65 dB Greg Veliz, City Manager City of Key West 1300 White Street Key West, FL 33040 Katie Halloran, Planning Director City of Key West Planning Department P.O. Box 1409 Key West, FL 33040 Roman Gastesi, Jr. Monroe County Administrator 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 205 Key West, FL 33040 Isabel Cosio Carballo, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council Oakwood Business Center 1 Oakwood Boulevard, Suite 250 Hollywood, FL 33020 Michael Gieda, Executive Director Key West Art and Historical Society 281 Front Street Key West, FL 33040 Theresa Axford, Superintendent Patricia Nicholas, Administrative Aide to Superintendent Monroe County School District 241 Trumbo Rd Key West, FL 33040 Charles Pattison, Executive Director Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Land Authority 1200 Truman Avenue, Suite 207 Key West, FL 33040 List of Consulted Parties Page C-10 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Regular Aeronautical Users of the Airport Bud Griner, Manager Robinson Aviation, Inc. (RVA, Inc.) KWIA Airport Traffic Control Tower 3479 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Eddie Cabrera, Station Manager Andrea Haynes, Customer Service Manager Signature Flight 3471 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Marcus Sessoms, President Peter Green, Business Manager Key West Seaplane Adventures 3471 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Dr. Julie Ann Floyd Seaplanes in Key West 3471 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Bruce Hagemann, Area Station Manager Silver Airways 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Steven Catanzaro, General Manager American Airlines 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Christine Long, General Manager United Airlines 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 List of Consulted Parties Page C-11 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Laura Thornbrugh, Station Manager Delta Airlines 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Steve Saunders, Operations Manager Federal Express 3553 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Michael Bandalan, CEO Mary Ann Armstrong, CFO Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. 5930 Balsom Ridge Road Denver, NC 28037 Robert Barrett, Director Ameriflight 1515 W. 20th St. D FW Airport, TX 75261 Peter Closi, President Air Adventures 3471 South Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, FL 33040 Robert Valle, Director of Operations Air Key West 412 Wh ite Street, U n it 101 Key West, FL 33040 Sarah A. Richardson, Manager, Airport Affairs Allegiant Air 1201 N. Town Center Drive Las Vegas, NV 89144-6305 Nathan Dimas, Station Manager Jet Blue Airways Corporation 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 Robert Kriedberg, Infrastructure, Properties & Development J etBlue Airways Corporation 200 Terminal Dr Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315 List of Consulted Parties Page C-12 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 106. ey AVes . International Al'*rport II , June 1, 2021 Mr. Peter M. Green, Environmental Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Orlando Airports District Office 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 400 Orlando, FL 32819 Re: Approval of Study Years for NEM Update Dear Mr. Green: At this juncture, progress toward the completion of the NEM Update has been impacted as we awaited publication of the FAA's 2021 APO Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) for EYW, as well as determination of a mutually acceptable and appropriate consecutive twelve months of aircraft operations to be used for the formulation of the NEM Existing Condition. I am very pleased that the FAA was receptive to my suggested revisions to the Draft TAF which are reflected in the May 2021 TAF publication. It is therefore seemingly appropriate to use the aircraft operations included in this TAF as a basis for development of the Future Condition NEM, and documentation of a pattern of yearly sustainable operational growth particularly in air carrier operations. The most recent twelve consecutive months of available historical aircraft operations (i.e., March 2020through April 2021) does not accurately reflect the level of aircraft operations that would have taken place if not for the impact of the worldwide pandemic. This impact was felt across the United States and the world. It is only recently that aircraft operations at EYW, particularly air carrier aircraft, are beginning to rise towards pre-pandemic operational and passenger levels.This time period is the anomaly and should not be used for the development of the Existing Condition NEM. The number of operations for the month of May 2020, which historically is one of our busiest months, was severely diminished by the impacts of COVID-19. According to the ATADS Comparison Report, total Page C-13 Mr. Peter M.Green Page 2 of 3 June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION itinerant aircraft operations for May 2020 were down 70% compared to May 2019. Air carrier operations were down 78%. Conversely, the ATADS Comparison Report evaluating October 2019 April 2020 and October 2020 — April 2021 indicates air carrier operations are up over 24%, and total itinerant operations are up over 31%. 1 think it is safe to say that we all agree that air carrier operations are by far the most significant contributor to the size and shape of the noise contours. As referenced earlier, the large increase in aircraft operations that EYW is currently experiencing is not an anomaly as borne out by the May 2021 FAA TAF. Notwithstanding the increase of 30% in total itinerant operations between FY 2020 and 2021, each successive year indicates additional incremental growth. However, air carrier operations increase at a higher rate than overall operations. Based on the analyses above, I propose the use of FY 2021 aircraft operations for use in the development of the Existing Condition, including analyses to determine fleet mix, runway utilization, flight track utilization, and day/night split. The data source will be FlightRadar24, since they have installed an ADS-B receiver at our airport, I feel this will be the most accurate source of historical data. Additionally, I propose that we use the fleet mix information developed for the recent EA, and the aforementioned runway utilization, flight track utilization, and day/night split for the Future Condition. Understanding that the entire twelve months of data will not be available for analysis until October 2021, it is likely that the NEM documentation may not be submitted to the FAA for formal review until early 2022. As required by 14 CFR part 150, the Sponsor will verify in writing that data in the documentation are representative of the existing condition as of the date of submission, assuming this is an accurate statement at the time. Please understand that realistically time is certainly of the essence. It is my understanding that the NEM Update must be completed (submitted and accepted) prior to requesting funding in a Grant Application for any noise mitigation based upon the updated NEMs and NCP Program Areas. Our goal and the community's expectation are to reach this milestone prior to the deadline for submitting our Grant Application for FY 2022, which is approximately June 1, 2022. The airport and Monroe County have made a pledge to our local citizenry to continue to move forward as rapidly as possible without cessation of program services to those most affected by airport operations. The Sponsor's primary tool to respond to complaints regarding increasing aircraft operations and associated perceived increases in noise is the Noise Insulation Program (NIP). Failure to deliver on a sustainable program implementation has resounding impacts on our collective credibility to meet our obligations to our noise impacted community. As you can see, the consequences of Page C-14 Mr. Peter M. Green Page 3 of 3 June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION missing this milestone, resulting in the NIP being forced into a holding pattern, will be quite serious especially from a political and public perception perspective. In conclusion, and for your consideration, the Sponsor is requesting the FAA to approve the use of FY 2021 historical aircraft operations for the development of the Existing Condition NEM,, and the use of FY 2027 aircraft operations as specified in the May 2021 FAA TAF for development of the Future Condition NEM. Sincerely yours, 1001011�� 0, JI 040"111111 00000111 0 0ii 000, 00000 0 0 W000 Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Key West International Airport XC: Bart Vernace, FAA ORL ADO Rebecca H. Henry, FAA ORL ADO Juan Brown, FAA ORL ADO Krystal Ritchie, FAA ORL ADO Pedro Blanco, FAA ORL ADO Deborah Lagos, DML&A, Airport Noise Program Coordinator Chris Bowker, P.E., Jacobs Page C-15 Gmail-FAA 2020 TAF Re-Posted and NEM Development Comments DRAFT DOCUMENT G m a SUBJECT TO REVISION Deborah Lagos <deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com> FAA 2020 TAF Re-Posted and NEM Development Comments 26 messages Green, Peter M (FAA) <peter.m.green@faa.gov> Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:41 PM To: "strickland-ri chard @monroecounty-fl.gov" <strickland-richard@monroecounty-fl.gov>, Deborah Lagos <deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com> Cc: "Vernace, Bart(FAA)" <Bart.Vernace@faa.gov>, "Harper, Rebecca H (FAA)" <rebecca.h.harper@faa.gov>, "Brown, Juan (FAA)" <Juan.Brown@faa.gov>, "Blanco, Pedro (FAA)" <Pedro.Blanco@faa.gov>, "Ritchey, Krystal (FAA)" <Krystal.Ritchey@faa.gov> Good afternoon Mr. Strickland, We want to inform you that the FAA's 2020 Terminal Area Forecast has been re-posted on the FAA's website and is available for use in developing the Future Condition NEM. Please let us know if you will be using the 2020 TAF or another forecast for the Future Conditions NEM. Also, we offer the following comments related to the development of the NEMs and the project schedule: • The FAA does not object to the County's proposal to use actual aircraft operations data for Fiscal Year 2021 to prepare the Existing Condition NEM. • The County proposes to obtain FY 2021 aircraft operations data for the Existing Condition study year from a commercial vendor. When this data collection is completed, the information should be compared with data collected by the FAA for the same period to identify any notable differences that should be addressed. • Although the County has pointed out recent and continued growth in passenger service and aircraft activity at EYW, the County proposes to use the same AEDT noise model settings and inputs from the recent EA to develop the NEMs. FAA disagrees with this approach. The AEDT model's settings, assumptions, and inputs should be reviewed and updated, as necessary, to ensure they reflect current and projected conditions for the Part 150 NEMs. The Scope of Work for the NEM Update grant states that a wide range of data (e.g., land use, zoning, aircraft operations, flight tracks, etc.)will be reviewed and updated, as needed. • FAA points out that the County's proposal to collect aircraft operations data through September 2021 and submit the NEMs sometime in `early 2022' delays the timeline for preparation, submittal, and approval of the NEMs. The `aggressive' project timeline previously provided only shows the County's major tasks (on a monthly basis) and would have the NEMs submitted to FAA sometime in April 2022. We request that a more detailed schedule be prepared and that it also incorporate FAA's tasks, including the agency's NEM review and approval process. During the update, we are available to discuss and provide input on the schedule and individual tasks. Best regards, Peter Green Page C-16 Gmo FAA oo2oTAF Refoatedend NEM Development Comments DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Peter m Green,/HC= Environmental Protection opaoanst Orlando Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 8427 SouthPark Circle Orlando, Florida 32819 407'487'7296 ��eir,,irn'gmeein@-faa'gmv Deborah Lagos <deboreh.murphy.|agom@Qmei|.00m> Wed, Jul 14. 2O21ot1:50PPN To: ^Gnaen. Peter M (F/A)^ <petacm.green@faa.gov> Thanks Peter! | will coordinate with Mr. Strickland, but just between you and me.... ° We are reviewing the AEDT inputs used previously and will adjust as needed, e.g., flight tracks, flight track utilization, runway utilization, etc. One thing we are reviewing at the moment is flight profiles because the ATCT Manager told us that thac are held down to 2,000' on departure to avoid conflict with NAS KVV traffic. We're evaluating the potential impact of that procedure to determine if we need to propose custom departure profiles..... hopefully not. ° Can you provide FAA review time for interim submittals (e.g.. Section 1, 2. 3, etc.)so | can incorporate that into the detailed schedule?What kind of time would you like me to include for the agency's NEM review and approval process (|'m assuming you mean the final review process)? THANKS! Deborah Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates, LLC 588 Running Deer Trail Waynesville, NC2878G 727.831.1553 deborah.murphy.|agos@gmai|.conn [Quoted text hidden] Green, Peter YN (FAA) <petecm.Qreen@foe.gov> Wed, Jul 14. 2021 ot1:5RPPN To: Deborah Lagos <debonsh.murphy.|egoo@gmoi|.00m> Do you have time tomorrow before 10:30 or after 2pmm to talk? It would be helpful to get a better feel for the timing of the interim submittals and optimal turnaround times. Page C-17 httpo://mai|.goog|o.nom/moi|/u0?ik=855a6cabc0&view=pt&saarch=a||Qpormthid=thnead-f`/`3A17O52828GH213Q82OO2&oimp|=mog-f%3A17052828H8 2/26 Deb-ora)ilMuorphy L,ajo*,F- A LOLL Sunday, September 26, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Peter M. Green, AICP Environmental Protection Specialist Orlando Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 8427 SouthPark Circle Orlando, Florida 32819 RE: Key West International Airport Fleet Mix & Operations for the Noise Exposure Maps Update Dear Peter: The purpose of this letter is to request approval of aircraft activity assumptions for use in the Noise Exposure Maps Update for Key West International Airport. On July 14, 2021, the FAA approved the use of the FAA's 2020 APO Terminal Area Forecast (TAF), issued in May 2021, and reposted to the FAA's website in July 2021, for developing the Future Condition NEM. It is the County's intention to use the number of aircraft operations presented in the FAA's 2020 TAF for Fiscal Year 2027 to develop the 2027 Future Condition NEM. Additionally, the FAA did not object to the County's proposal to use actual aircraft operations data for Fiscal Year 2021 to prepare the Existing Condition NEM. The County proposes to develop aircraft operational levels for the 2021 Existing Condition from the FlightRadar24 and FAA ATADS data (obtained from the FAA Operations & Performance Data website) from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. The Operations Network (OPSNET) is the official source of FAA air traffic operations. The FlightRadar24 operations will be adjusted by calculating a proportionality constant for each category to equate to the number of operations by category from ATADS. The County proposes to use the FlightRadar24 data to develop the fleet mix, runway utilization, flight tracks, flight track utilization, and day/night split for the Existing Condition. The Operational Network (OPSN definition of variable defines Airport Operations as all arrivals and departures at an airport (overflights are not included). Overflights are defined as IFR and VFR operations performed by an aircraft that originates outside the towers' airspace and enters and exits the tower's or TRACON's airspace without landing. Overflights also include helicopter operations that land or depart from an airport non- movement area or from an off-airport location. These definitions were taken into account when comparing ATADS to FlightRadar24 data. 566 Running Deer Trail Waynesville, NC 28786 P:727.631.1553 deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 2 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Table 1 is an example of the proposed method for adjusting the exisitng operations. Currently available ATADS Airport Operations data for EYW (October 2020 through August 2021) were compared to the FlightRadar24 data for the same period. Proportionality constants were calculated by category and applied to the FlightRadar24 operations for each AEDT aircraft type within each category. TABLE 1 Method for Adjusting FY'21 Operations General Aviation Military and Total Date Air Carrier Air Taxi and Local Local Operations Civil Military Oct-20 11035 395 21318 26 3,774 Nov-20 15218 466 21055 21 31760 Dec-20 11596 517 21936 42 57091 Jan-21 11809 620 3,429 59 57917 Feb-21 11592 659 31562 33 5,846 Mar-21 21229 774 3,984 69 7,056 Apr-21 21258 768 31609 32 61667 May-21 21286 633 31968 62 67949 Jun-21 21254 525 27836 47 57 662 Jul-21 21097 504 2,509 22 57132 Aug-21 15863 374 2,180 24 47441 ATADS Tota I: 203237 61235 33,386 437 603295 F R24 Tota 1 1%487 71211 18,867 406 45,971 Difference 750 -976 14,519 31 147324 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Proportionality 103.85% 86.47% 176.95% 107.64% 131.16% Consta nt Adjusted F R24 TOTAL 203 237 65235 339386 437 603295 Sources: Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS)from 10/2020 to 08/2021 FlightRadar24 from 10/01/2020 to 08/31/2021 Page C-19 Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 3 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION The fleet mix for the Exisitng Condition was developed from the FlightRadar24 data for October 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021 (i.e., currently available data). The fixed-wing fleet mix is shown in Table 2. The proportionality constants will be updated following receipt and processing of FlightRadar24 data for September 2021. The fleet mix will be recalculated using the final proportionality constants. TABLE 2 Fixed-Wing Aircraft Fleet Mix 01-Oct-2020 TO 31-Aug-2021 TOTAL OPS A E DT Al RC RA FT CATEGORY DAY NIGHT TOTAL 737800 AC/AT J ET 21 - 21 A319-131 AC/AT J ET 5,529 1,018 6,547 EMB 145 A C/AT J ET 81 4 85 EMB 170 A C/AT J ET 2.1825 487 3.0312 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... EMB 175 A C/AT J ET 81020 1,427 9,447 EMB 190 A C/AT J ET 696 130 826 C N A 208 A C/AT PROP 11 606 182 11787 DHC6 AC/AT PROP 1,826 233 2,059 DHC8 AC/AT PROP 2,089 222 2,311 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... DHC830 AC/AT PROP 27 3 30 S F 340 A C/AT PROP 39 9 48 BEC58P GA 2,746 333 3,079 CNA 172 GA 1,803 235 2,039 ........................................................................................................... ................................... ........................................................................... CNA 182 GA 660 103 763 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... CNA201 GA 78 11 88 CNA 206 GA 163 9 172 CNA 20T GA 244 37 281 C N A441 GA 400 44 444 CO MS E P GA 3,152 370 3.0521 DHC-2FLT GA 55 5 60 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... D0328 GA 1,623 207 1,830 GAS E P F GA 3,463 363 31826 GAS E P V GA 1,552 207 1,759 PA30 GA 23 4 27 PA42 GA 55 7 62 S D330 GA 154 12 166 Page C-20 Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 4 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2 continued Fixed-Wing Aircraft Fleet Mix 01-Oct-2020 TO 31-Aug-2021 TOTALOPS A E DT A I RC RA FT CATEGORY TOTAL DAY NIGHT B D-700-1A 10 GA JET 94 9 103 C525C GA JET 193 25 218 C I T3 GA JET 113 14 127 C L600 GA JET 1,065 200 1,265 CNA500 GA JET 1,363 149 1,511 CNA510 GA J ET 1,543 173 11716 C N A525C GA J ET 142 30 172 CNA55B GA JET 731 111 842 CNA560E GA JET 520 73 593 CNA560U GA JET 809 106 915 C N A560X L GA JET 111177 113 1,290 C N A 680 GA JET 111147 163 1,309 C N A750 GA JET 568 55 623 ECLI PSE500 GA JET 149 9 157 FA L900EX GA JET 718 83 802 GIIB GA JET 9 2 11 G I V GA JET 356 55 411 GV GA JET 388 55 442 A 1125 GA JET 274 42 317 LEA R35 GA JET 1,895 265 21161 M U 3001 GA JET 260 25 285 C130E MIL 90 3 94 C17 MIL 17 - 17 F16WO MIL 149 - 149 HUNTER MIL 110 - 110 ................................................... ................................................... ..................................¢.................................. ................................... T-38 MIL 68 - 68 TOTAL 52,874 7,420 60,294 Sources: Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS)from 10/2020 to 08/2021 FlightRadar24 from 10/01/2020 to 08/31/2021 Page C-21 Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 5 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION The County proposed to use the fleet mix information developed for the recent EA and runway utilization, flight track utilization, and day/night split developed from historical FlightRadar24 data for the Future Condition. The FAA requested the County review documents subsequently developed by Ricondo (e.g., Draft PFC 21-19 Application, Revised Draft of the Concourse A Project Description to justify CATEX, dated June 2021), as well as any new information regarding upcoming changes in fleet mix, to validate the fleet mix developed for the EA, since conditions at EYW are changing rapidly. This letter summarizes and addresses this information and proposes a fleet mix to be used for the 2027 Future Condition NEM. According to the Revised Draft of the Concourse A Project Description to justify CATEX, dated June 2021, the proposed Concourse A project would not result in an increase in the number of aircraft operations at EYW. The project would not result in any changes in the use of the runways at the airport or in aircraft flight tracks to and from the airport. The project would not change fleet mix. According to the Draft PFC 21-19 Application, the Concourse A project would not increase capacity that could enable new aircraft activity or a different fleet to serve the airport. The fleet mix for the Future Condition was developed from the Existing Condition. At this time, the airport has been advised that Delta and JetBlue, operating the A319 and EMB190 respectively, will begin operating the A220. Both will transition in advance of 2027. (The AEDT substitution for the A220 is 737700). The number of aircraft operations by category presented in the FAA's 2020 TAF for Fiscal Year 2027 were compared to the number of operations by category in the Existing Condition. Proportionality constants were calculated by category and applied to the Exisiting Condition.Table 3 shows an example of the method used to calculate the future operations. The proportionality constants will be updated following receipt and processing of FlightRadar24 data for September 2021. The fleet mix will be recalculated using the final proportionality constants. TABLE 3 Method for Calculating Future Operations Air Carrier Air Taxi & GA MilitaryTotal Commuter FY'2027 26,124 81414 331433 442 681P 413 Oct 2020-Aug 2021 20,237 610235 331386 437 60.1294 Proportionality Constant 129% 135% 100% 101% Source: APO Terminal Area Forecast Detail Report, May 2021. Page C-22 Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 6 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION The proposed Future Condition Fixed-Wing Aircraft Fleet Mix is shown in Table 4. TABLE 4 Fixed-Wing Aircraft Future Fleet Mix TOTA L O P S A E DT A I RC RA FT CATEGORY DAY NIGHT TOTAL 737800 AC/AT J ET 27 - 27 737700 A C/AT J ET 8,036 11481 91517 EMB 145 AC/AT J ET 105 5 110 EMB 170 A C/AT J ET 3,646 629 41275 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... EMB 175 AC/AT J ET 10,353 111842 12,195 CNA 208 A C/AT PROP 214167 245 21412 DHC6 AC/AT PROP 2,465 314 21778 DHC8 AC/AT PROP 2,819 300 31119 DHC830 AC/AT PROP 37 4 40 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... S F 340 A C/AT PROP 53 12 64 B EC58P GA 21 750 333 3,083 CNA 172 GA 11P 806 236 2,041 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... CNA 182 GA 661 103 764 C N A201 GA 78 11 89 CNA 206 GA 163 9 172 C N A20T GA 245 37 282 C N A441 GA 400 44 445 CO MS E P GA 3,156 370 31526 , DHC-2FLT GA 55 5 60 D0328 2CG-A A 111625 207 11832 GASEP F A 3,468 363 31831 GAS E PVEEt 1,554 207 11761 PA30 GA 23 4 27 PA42 GA 55 7 62 S D330 GA 154 12 167 B D-700-1A 10 GA JET 94 9 103 C525C GA JET 193 25 218 C I T3 GA JET 113 14 128 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... C L600 GA JET 1.1067 200 11267 ..................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................ ....................................... CNA 500 GA JET 1,364 149 11513 CNA 510 GA JET 1,545 174 1,719 CNA 525C GA JET E732 30 172 CNA55B GA J ETE rF: :112 843 CNA560E GA JET 521 73 594 CNA560U GA JET 810 106 916 Page C-23 Fleet Mix& Operations for the EYW Noise Exposure Maps Update DRAFT DOCUMENT Page 7 of 7 Sunday, September 26, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4 continued Fixed-Wing Aircraft Future Fleet Mix 77 TOPS A E DT A I RC RA FT TAL O CATEGORY DAY NI GHT TOTAL 7j C N A560X L GA JET 111178 113 11292 C N A 680 GA J ET 11#148 163 11311 C N A 750 GA JET 569 55 624 ECLI PSE500 GA JET 149 9 158 FAL900EX GA JET 719 83 803 GIIB GA JET 9 2 11 G I V GA JET 356 55 411 GV GA JET 388 55 443 I A 1125 GA JET 275 43 317 LEA R35 GA JET 1,898 266 21164 MU3001 GA JET 260 25 285 C130E MIL 91 3 95 C17 MIL 17 - 17 F16WO MIL 150 - 150 ........................................................................................................... ................................... ........................................................................... HUNTER MIL 111 - 111 T-38 MIL 69 - 69 TOTAL 59,870 8,543 681413 Sources: Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS)from 10/2020 to 08/2021 FlightRadar24 from 10/01/2020 to 08/31/2021 In conclusion, Monroe County requests that the FAA approve the methods described herein to develop the fleet mix and number of operations for use in preparing the updated Noise Exposure Maps for Key West International Airport. In addition, since delivery of the NEM document for the FAA's formal review and determination is scheduled to occur in February 2023, the County requests approval to use FY'2028 (rather than FY'2027) for the Future Condition NEM. Sincerely, Deborah Lagos President xc: Richard Strickland, Director of Airports Page C-24 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION RECORD OF CONVERSATION November 18, 2021, 3:30 PM, via Microsoft Teams RE: EYW NEM Update - Discuss 2000-ft Hold Down Modeling Participants: • Peter M. Green, Environmental Protection Specialist/ FAA ORL ADO • Sean Doyle, Senior Aviation Noise Policy & Research Specialist at Federal / FAA • Adam Scholter, Environmental Protection Specialist/ FAA • Susumu Shirayama, Environmental Protection Specialist/ FAA • Mike Alberts, Senior Aviation Specialist/ RS&H • Deborah Lagos, Project Manager, EYW NEM Update / Deborah Murphy Lagos & Associates • Susan Staehle, Environmental Specialist/ FAA • Pedro Blanco, Lead Program Manager/ FAA ORL ADO Invited, not participating: • Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports / EYW Reference: Letter to Peter M. Green from Deborah Lagos dated October 26, 2021, describing proposed approach to modeling 2,000-ft hold down. Summary of Discussion: Sean Doyle suggested using an altitude control code rather than the method proposed in the letter. Mike Alberts described challenges/effort involved in using this method related to determination of the point (i.e., distance along the flight track) where different aircraft types and different stage lengths of each aircraft type would reach 2,000 feet AMSL. Adam Scholter suggested a method using AEDT profile data to determine the point along a given track that individual aircraft reach the 2,000 AMSL. Mike Alberts described the general locations where aircraft reach 2,000 feet AMSL as being at the edge of the islands (e.g., Stock Island and Racoon Key) and/or over the Gulf of Mexico (e.g., between the islands of Key West and Boca Chica Key). He also indicated that approximately ten percent of aircraft operations are held down, while ninety percent follow standard departure profiles. Sean Doyle asked why this procedure was being modeled, stating that there is no obligation to use non-standard data. Peter Green indicated it was related to the Sponsor's ability to certify the accuracy of the NEMs. Discussion ensued regarding the potential effect (or lack of effect) modeling this procedure would have on the DNL 65 dBA contour. Sean Doyle pointed out that in the context of a Part 150 Study, we are only obligated to the extent of the DNL 65 dBA contour, not beyond as would be the case in an EA or EIS that, under specific circumstances, must look at changes in DNL below 65 dBA. Also, in a Part 150 Study, we primarily are concerned with residential land uses. Deborah Lagos indicated that the flight tracks will be modeled out to the 30,000 feet as required in Part 150. Page 1 of 2 Page C-25 DRAFT DOCUMENT Record of Conversation SUBJECT TO REVISION Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2021 Based upon this discussion, it was suggested we use the standard profiles (1) because the any effect of the custom profiles would be over the water, which doesn't affect any people, and (2) only a small percentage of aircraft operations would be modeled with custom profiles. Peter Green expressed remaining concern because this is a known situation, and just because the effect is technically over the water, the public may feel like the process wasn't thorough. However, he would feel comfortable if this was thoroughly documented in a Technical Appendix that explained how the situation was analyzed and why it was ultimately determined to use standard instead of custom profiles. Conclusion: Standard profiles will be used to model all aircraft operations for the EYW NEM Update. A Technical Appendix will be prepared which thoroughly describes the screening analysis performed to support this decision. Prepared by: Deborah Lagos Page C-26 �eborahv M uorphy L alf oo*,F,r A >4 LLC Thursday, February 17, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT Peter M. Green, AICP SUBJECT TO REVISION Environmental Protection Specialist Orlando Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 8427 SouthPark Circle Orlando, Florida 32819 RE: Key West International Airport Final Operations for the Existing Condition NEM Dear Peter: Pursuant to 14 CFR §150.21(b), which requires that interested persons be afforded adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments during the development of the map, information regarding the development of aircraft operations data was presented during the regular meeting of Monroe County's Ad Hoc Committee on Noise on December 7, 2021. You received a copy of the agenda package containing the PowerPoint presentation and attended this meeting via Zoom. As you are aware, following the presentation of this information, a lengthy discussion (approximately 15 minutes) took place regarding the use of FlightRadar24 vs OPSNET data. At issue was the large difference in the number of operations reported by OPSNET vs. FlightRadar24 (approximately 20,000 operations). Subsequently, the raw FlightRadar24 data was reanalyzed, and it was discovered that most of the "missing" operations were misidentified as overflights, when in fact they were departures or arrivals. The attached document describes the proposed method for developing the fleet mix and number of operations to be used for generating the Existing Condition NEM. Your approval of this document is requested, so that development of the Existing Condition NEM can proceed. Sincerely, Deborah Lagos President xc: Richard Strickland, Director of Airports 566 Running Deer Trail Waynesville,NC 28786 P:727.631.1553 deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Method for Developing Fleet Mix and Number of Operations For the Existing Condition NEM at EYW 1.0 Data Sources Historical aircraft operations data were obtained from Flightradar24 (FR24), FAA's Operations Network (OPSNET) and Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS), and EYW Landing Reports for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. The source of the detailed aircraft operations data used in this analysis was Flightradar24, TFMS, and EYW Landing Reports, because OPSNET only provides total operations by aircraft category. 1.1 F/ightRadar24 The primary technology that Flightradar24 (FR24) uses to receive flight information is called automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B). The ground-based ADS-B receivers collect data from any aircraft in their local area that are equipped with an ADS-B transponder and feed this data to the Internet in real time. The aircraft-based transponders use the GPS and other flight data input to transmit signals containing aircraft registration, position, altitude, velocity and other flight data. For security and privacy reasons information about some aircraft is limited or blocked. This includes most military aircraft and certain high-profile aircraft, like Air Force One. FR24 has a network of approximately 23,000 ADS-B receivers around the world that receive flight information from aircraft transponders and send this information to their servers. ADS-B signals are high frequency (1090 MHz) and must be received in line of sight. As such the coverage from each receiver is about 150-250 miles in all directions depending on the specific installation location. The farther away from the receiver an aircraft is flying, the higher it must fly to be covered by the receiver. The most reliable content is supplied directly from the aircraft's transponder. This includes Aircraft id and Callsign as well as the position and movement fields Latitude, Longitude, Heading, Altitude, Speed etc. Note that aircraft without an ADS-B transponder do not transmit a long itude/latitude position report. To calculate the position of these aircraft FR24 uses a technique called Multilateration (MCAT). MCAT is only possible when the aircraft is flying within direct range of at least four ADS-B ground receivers. The FAA published Federal Regulation 14 CFR 91.225 and 14 CFR 91.227 in May 2010. The final rule dictates that effective January 1, 2020, aircraft operating in airspace defined in §91.225 are required to have an Automatic Dependent Surveillance— Broadcast (ADS-B) system that includes a certified position source capable of meeting requirements defined in§91.227.These regulations set a minimum performance standard for both the ADS-B transmitter and the position sources integrated with the ADS-B equipment. Page 1 of 14 Page C-28 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 1.2 OPSNET The Operations Network(OPSNET) is the official source of FAA National Airspace System (NAS)air traffic operations data. The data is reported to OPSNET by the Airport Traffic Control Tower(ATCT) and can be viewed on the FAA Operations & Performance Data Web site. The OPSNET separates operations into Itinerant and Local. Itinerant operations are separated into four categories: Air Carrier, Air Taxi, General Aviation, and Military. Local operations are separated into two categories: Civil and Military. OPSNET only provides total operations by aircraft category. Definitions of these categories are as follows: • Air Carrier. (AC) Aircraft with seating capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pounds, carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. This includes US and foreign-flagged carriers. • Air Taxi. (AT) Aircraft designed to have a maximum seating capacity of 60 seats or less or a maximum payload capacity of 18,000 pounds or less, carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. • Civil. Operations by all classes of private and commercial takeoffs and landings at FAA and Federal Contract Tower(FCT)facilities. • General Aviation. (GA) Takeoffs and landings of all civil aircraft, except for air carriers or air taxis. • Itinerant. Operations performed by an aircraft, either IFR or VFR, that land at an airport arriving from outside the airport area or depart from an airport and leave the airport area. • Local. Operations performed by an aircraft that remain in the local traffic pattern, execute simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport, and operations to or from the same airport within a designated practice area within a 20-miles radius of the tower. • Military. (MIL) Operations by all classes of military takeoffs and landings at FAA and FCT facilities. Following consultation with Air Traffic Manager at EYW Airport Traffic Control Tower, it has been confirmed that OPSNET "Airport Operations" are just the aircraft that land and takeoff from Key West International Airport and the OPSNET"Tower Operations" contain the military overflights that fly through EYW airspace. 1.3 TFMS Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS) Counts (TFMSC) include aircraft that fly under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) and are captured by the FAA's enroute computers. TFMSC groups flights into three user groups: Commercial, General Aviation, and Military. These three groups were chosen because of the slightly different user classes used by TFMS and OPSNET. Most VFR (Visual Flight Rules)and some non- enroute IFR traffic are excluded. TFMSC source data are created when pilots file flight plans and/or when flights are detected by the NAS, usually via RADAR. The flight counts reported in TFMSC are derived from flight records assembled by the FAA NAS Data Warehouse by threading the many TFMS messages Page 2 of 14 Page C-29 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION together. These flight records may be incomplete records when one end is missing, or when only planned components are available. Due to limited radar coverage and incomplete messaging, TFMS may exclude certain flights that do not enter the enroute airspace and other low-altitude flights. 1.4 EYW Landing Reports Key West International Airport tracks aircraft landings for passenger and cargo airlines for the purpose of collecting landing fees and statistical data. The airlines submit monthly reports to the airport that detail the number of each aircraft type that landed at the airport during the month. Landing Fees are collected from: Delta Airlines (including Endeavor, Republic, Express Jet), American Airlines (including American Eagle, Republic, and Envoy), Allegiant Air, United Airlines (including United Express, Republic, and Express Jet), JetBlue Airways, Silver Airways, Ameriflight, Mountain Air Cargo, and Martinaire Aviation. 2.0 Existing Condition Fleet Mix Fleet mix for the 2021 Existing Condition were developed from the FR24 for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30,2021. EYW Landing Reports for the same period were reviewed as a supplementary source. The fixed-wing fleet mix was divided into five categories: AC/AT JET, AC/AT PROP, GA JET, GA PROP, and MIL. In this categorization, the term "Jet" includes aircraft with turbojet or turbofan engines. The term "Prop" includes aircraft where the main source of thrust is a propeller. Helicopter operations were included in a separate category, HELO. These categories were selected primarily for flight track development and utilization. Aircraft occasionally must perform a go-around or missed approach at EYW. Generally, if a pilot determines by the time the aircraft is at the decision height (for a precision approach) or missed approach point (for a non-precision approach), that the runway or its environment is not in sight, or that a safe landing cannot be accomplished for any reason, the landing approach must be discontinued (a "go-around") and the missed approach procedure must be immediately initiated. It is also common for pilots to practice a missed approach as part of initial or recurrent instrument training. For this analysis, go-arounds and missed approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). 2.1 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Jet Regularly scheduled air carrier / air taxi jet (AC/AT JET) passenger aircraft operations at KWIA include Airbus A319, Embraer EMB-145, EMB-170, EMB-175 and EMB-190 aircraft. Current AC/AT JET operators include Delta Airlines, American Airlines, American Eagle, Allegiant Air, United Express, and JetBlue Airways. The top destinations for AC/AT JET aircraft flights from KWIA include Atlanta (ATL), Miami (MIA), Charlotte (CLT), Chicago (ORD), Newark (EWR), Washington DC (IAD), and Dallas (DFW). During the Ad-Hoc Committee meeting on March 7, 2022, there was a discussion regarding Delta's use of a CRJ (instead of an A319), during Eastern Standard Time, for their last arrival of the day. Subsequently it Page 3 of 14 Page C-30 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION was determined via consultation with Delta Airlines that this did not occur between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021. 2.2 Air Carrier/Air Taxi Prop Air carrier/air taxi prop (AC/AT PROP) passenger and cargo aircraft operations at KWIA include ATR42, ATR72, Beech King Air, Cessna 208, De Havilland Canada Dash 8, De Havilland Twin Otter, Fairchild Swearingen SA26-AT Merlin, Saab 340, and Shorts 330. Current AC/AT PROP operators include, but are not limited to, Silver Airways, Ameriflight, and Mountain Air Cargo. The top destinations for AC/AT PROP aircraft flights from KWIA include Tampa (TPA), Orlando (MCO and ORL), Ft. Lauderdale (FLL and FXE), Miami (MIA, OPF, and TMB), Boca Raton (BCT), Fort Myers (FMT), Naples (APF), Palm Beach (PBI), and Kissimmee (ISM). 2.3 General Aviation Jet General aviation jet (GA JET) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant turbojet aircraft. Common GA JET aircraft operations at KWIA include Bombardier Challenger, Cessna Citation, Dassault Falcon, Gulfstream, and Learjet. 2.4 General Aviation Prop General aviation prop (GA PROP) aircraft operations consist of private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant aircraft, including lightweight single-and multi-engine (piston), and turboprop aircraft. Common GA PROP aircraft operations at KWIA include Beech, Cessna, Cirrus, Mooney, Partenavia, and Piper. 2.5 Helicopters Helicopter (HELO) aircraft operations consist of local government-, private- and corporate-owned based and itinerant rotorcraft, in which lift and thrust are supplied by horizontally spinning rotors, which allows the aircraft to take off and land vertically, to hover, and to fly forward, backward and laterally. Helicopters do not takeoff or land on the airport's runways, but rather from the nonmovement area of the Fixed Base Operator. Common HELO aircraft operations at KWIA include Aerospatiale, Eurocopter, Bell, Hughes, Robinson, and Sikorsky. 2.6 MifitaLLI Military(MIL)aircraft operations consist of fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft that are operated by any armed service or the federal government. Military aircraft can be either combat or non-combat. Common fixed- wing MIL aircraft operations at KWIA include Beechcraft C-12 Huron, Boeing 737, Boeing P8 Poseidon, EADS CASA HC-144 Ocean Sentry, Cessna Citation UH35A, Lockheed-Martin C130 Hercules, and Northrop T-38 Falcon. Common MIL helicopter operations at KWIA include Bell TH-57 Sea Ranger, Eurocopter UH-72A Lakota, Hughes MH-6 Little Bird, Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk, Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk, and Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion. Page 4 of 14 Page C-31 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Military aircraft occasionally conduct low approaches to the runway at EYW, without touching down at the airport. These are often training flights to practice landing approach to just above the runway. The military made the decision decades ago that it is safer to not perform touch and go landings in high performance jet aircraft, because every landing decreases the useful life of the tires, wheels and brakes, and actual touch and go landings introduce risks to the flight operation, including running off the end of the runway before getting airborne again. The US Navy is the only service to practice touch and go landings regularly (not necessarily at KWIA). This is because Navy pilots need to practice touching down in a very small touchdown zone when operating from aircraft carriers. For this analysis, low approaches are being counted as a departure and an arrival (i.e., two operations). 3.0 Fli_ghtRadar24 Data Processing FR24 extracted Historic Flight Positions Data for EYW for the period October 1, 2020 through September 307 2021. The dataset was filtered to only include an approximate 10-mile radius around EYW. However, strictly speaking this has been applied as a quadrilateral so there are some additional positions at each of its four corners (north-east, north-west, south-east, south-west). Owing to this boundary box approach to filtering positions around EYW limited flights in cruise (at approximately 40,000ft)were present. In order to make sure that all potential flights associated with EYW were included in the dataset, including those from small aircraft that may not be broadcasting ADS-B, the dataset was configured based on the specified region rather than just flights were confirmed as having their origin or destination as EYW. This is because the position, altitude and speed of smaller aircraft that transmit Mode-S (i.e., those without an ADS-B transponder) can only be detected when in line of sight with four ADS-B ground receivers simultaneously, and therefore may not be possible at low altitudes. Without this very low altitude detection, these flights may not have been matched to EYW. The first detection of an aircraft may be once it has reached a few thousand feet altitude. By including these in the dataset however, it was ensured they were considered rather than them being excluded altogether. The data consists of one ccpositions.csv" file for every aircraft operation and one "flights.csv"file containing all aircraft operations for a single day. The "flights.csv"file lists all the individual flights contained within the dataset, separated by day (defined as midnight through midnight in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC). The 96positions.csv"file contains the full set of flight position data available for each individual flight listed in the flights file. The two files are linked via the flight—id. While the Historic Flight Data is aggregated from multiple sources, the most reliable content is supplied directly from the aircraft's Mode-S or ADS-B transponder. The"flights.csv"data file includes(but is not limited to)aircraft registration, aircraft equipment type, callsign, commercial flight number, scheduled departure airport, and scheduled arrival airport. The ccpositions.csv5) data file includes (but is not limited to) time of position, altitude, heading, latitude, and longitude. For the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021 there were 366 ccpositions.csv" files and 60,825 "flights.csv"files. Page 5 of 14 Page C-32 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION To efficiently process FR24's Historic Flight Positions Data, Microsoft Excel was utilized to program macros in Excel VBA. Macros were developed to convert UTC to local time (taking into consideration the dates for Eastern Standard Time vs. Eastern Daylight Savings Time), determine if the flight operation occurred during daytime (local time between 07:00 and 21:59) or nighttime (local time between 22:00 and 06:59 the next day), runway used, whether each flight operation was a departure, arrival, helicopter, touch-and-go, or overflight, etc. Lookup tables were built to identify AEDT aircraft type, aircraft category and stage length. A separate macro was developed to produce XML files to display the flight tracks in Google Earth. The initial processing of the Historic Flight Positions Data was completed in November 2021, and the results were presented to the Ad-Hoc Committee at their December 7, 2021 meeting. During this meeting, there was a discussion regarding the discrepancy between the number of flight operations identified from FR24 vs. OPSNET. Subsequently, the algorithms developed to process the FR24 Historic Flight Positions Data were reviewed and refined, and the Historic Flight Positions Data was reprocessed. This resulted in a much better correlation between the number of operations between FR24 and OPSNET.The revised results were presented to the Ad-Hoc Committee at their March 1, 2022 meeting, and the committee was satisfied with these results. The following sections reflect these revised results. 4.0 Existing Condition Number of Operations Since the OPSNET represents FAA's official count of air traffic operations data, it was determined that the number of operations by category should match the OPSNET for modeling purposes. Aircraft operational levels for the 2021 Existing Condition were based on the FAA's OPSNET for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. FR24 and EYW Landing Reports for the same period were reviewed as a supplementary sources. A summary of the three data sources is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS BY CATEGORY OCTOBER 1, 2020—SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AIR AIR GENERAL SOURCE MILITARY TOTAL CARRIER TAXI AVIATI O N OPSNET 21,563 67593 357533 439 64,128 FLIGHT RADAR 24 197742 67370 337 230 406 597748 EYW LANDING 197456 37142 NA NA NA REPORTS Sources: OPSNET,2021,FlightRadar24,2022, EYW Landing Reports,2021. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Page 6 of 14 Page C-33 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 5.0 Existing Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations Fleet mix defines the various types of aircraft and allows development of very specific input data, such as engine type, title 14 CFR part 36 Noise Stage Certification, gross weight, and departure stage length. The Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) is a software system that is designed to model aviation related operations in space and time to compute noise, emissions, and fuel consumption. The AEDT is currently the FAA's standard tool for producing noise contours and analyzing noise levels at sensitive sites. The AEDT aircraft database contains actual noise and performance data for numerous types of aircraft. Although the AEDT aircraft database provides a large selection of aircraft to model, it does not contain every known aircraft. For this reason, the FAA has developed an official aircraft substitution list which allows the modeler to substitute similar aircraft when necessary for modeling purposes. These substitutions represent a very close estimate of the noise produced by the actual aircraft. Notable substitutions are shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 NOTABLE AEDT AIRCRAFT SUBSTITUTIONS AEDT AC TYPE CATEGORY AC TYPE DESCRIPTION AT46 ATR 42-600 DHC8 AC AT PROP C27J C27J -Alenia C-27J Spartan CV LP Co nva i r CV 240- CV 440 DH8A DH8A- Bombardier DHC8-100 AT76 ATR 72-600 CULT Convai r CV-580 DHC830 AC/AT PROP DH813 DH813- Bombardier DHC8-200 DH8C DH8C- Dash 8/DHC8-300 DH8D Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Q400 C208 C208- Cessna 208 Caravan EPIC EPIC- Dynasty KODI KODI -Quest Kodiak P750 P750- PAL P-750 XSTOL CNA208 AC AT PROP PA11 Piper PA-11 Cub Special PA12 Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser PC12 PC12- Pilatus PC-12 TBM7 TBM7-Socata TBM-7 TBM9 TBM9-Socata TBM TEX2 TEX2- Raytheon Texan 2 C510 C510- Cessna Citation Mustang E50P E50P- Embraer Phenom 100 CNA510 GA JET E545 E545- Embraer EMB-545 Legacy 450 E55P E55P- Embraer Phenom 300 SF50 SF50- Cirrus Vision SF50 Page 7 of 14 Page C-34 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) NOTABLE AEDT AIRCRAFT SUBSTITUTIONS AEDTACTYPE CATEGORY AC TYPE DESCRIPTION AC80 AC80-Aero Commander Turbo 680 AC90 AC90-Gulfstream Commander ACAM Lockwood Air Cam AN28 AN28-Antonov An-28 B350 B350- Beech Super King Air350 BE10 BE10- Beech King Air 100A/B BE20 BE20- Beech 200Super King BE30 BE30- Raytheon 300Super King Air BE38 BE38- Raytheon Super KingAir BE9 BE9- Beechcraft C99Airliner; Beech Aircraft BE90 BE90- Beech King Air90 BE95 Beech 95Travel Air BE99 BE99- Beech Airliner99 DHC6 AC/AT PROP gE91- BE9L- Beech King Air90 BE9T BE9T- Beech F90 King Air C2 Grumman C-2 Greyhound DHC2 de Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver DHC3 de Havilland Canada DHC-3 Otter DHC6 DHC6- DeHavilland Twin Otter E110 Embraer EMB-110 Bandeirante JS31 British Aerospace Jetstream 31 M28 M28- PZL M-28 Skytruck MU2 MU2- Mitsubishi Marquise/Solitaire MU20 MU20- Marquise/Solitaire P180 P180- Piaggio P-180Avanti SW2 SW2- Fairchild Swearingen SA26-AT Merlin IIB SW3 SW3- Fairchild Swearingen SA-226T/TB Merlin 3 SW4 SW4-Swearingen Merlin 4/4A Metro2 BE4W BE40- Raytheon/Beech Beechjet 400/T-1 C550 C550- Cessna Citation II/Bravo CNA55B GA JET C551 C551- Cessna Citation I I/SP C55B C55B-Cessna Citation Bravo PC24 PC24- Pilatus PC-24 C680 C680- Cessna Citation Sovereign C68A C68A-Cessna Citation Latitude CNA680 GA JET C700 Cessna 700 Citation Longitude HDJT HDJT- HONDA HA-420 HondaJet Page 8 of 14 Page C-35 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) NOTABLE AEDT AIRCRAFT SUBSTITUTIONS AEDT AC TYPE CATEGORY AC TYPE DESCRIPTION C750 C750- Cessna Citation X CN7 C750- Cessna Citation X F2TH F2TH- Dassault Falcon 2000 CNA750 GA JET FA20 FA20- Dassault Falcon/Mystere 20 GLF2 GLF2- Gulfstream II/G200 HA4T HA4T- Hawker4000 J328 Fairchild Dornier 328JET DA50 DA50- Mystere Falcon 50 Dassault F900 F900- Dassault Falcon 900 FAL900EX GA JET FA50 FA50- Dassault Fa I con/Mystere 50 FA7X FA7X- Dassault Falcon F7X FABX FABX- Dassault Falcon 8X ASTR ASTR- IAI Astra 1125 G150 G150-Gulfstream G150 IA1125 GA JET G280 G280-Gulfstream G280 GALX GALX- IAI 1126 Gal axy/Gulfstream G200 WW24 WW24- IAI 1124 Westwi nd FA10 FA10- Dassault Falcon/Mystere 10 H 25A H 25A- BAe HS 125-1/2/3/400/600 H25B H25B- BAe HS 125/700-800/Hawke r 800 H25C H25C- BAe/Raytheon HS 125-1000/Hawker 1000 U31 U31- Bombardier Learjet 31/A/B U35 U35- Bombardier Learjet35 LEAR35 GA JET U40 U40- Learjet 40; Gates Learjet U45 U45- Bombardier Learjet 45 U55 U55- Bombardier Learjet55 U60 U60- Bombardier Learjet 60 U 70 U 70- Learjet 70 U75 U75- Learjet75 SBR1 SBR1- North American Rockwell Sabre 40/60 Sources: AEDT Fleet 3c.xlsx,2021,AEDT3crrGA Lookup List1.xlsx,2021 Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates To develop the proposed number of operations by aircraft type for the Fleet Mix, the percentage of operations for each aircraft in each category was calculated from the FR24 data, as shown in Table 3. Page 9 of 14 Page C-36 z00 00 al 00 al �p Ln 00 l0 M N iq to O wm O O Ln Q1 tD oo Ln r-i CM 00 l0 rl M r1 Ol l0 a �l l0 M lD M N 00 m fV 00 � � � O 00 l0 M 00 I� O 00 N . r-I r-1 • 00 00 00 LD Ln � Mr-4 N r( l r-1U z O Ur 00 l0 M N N N r-I rl W w LL oc O o U O O 0 a r ~ U ~ U Q LU 0 m — w LU J � Of LL O o 0 0 0 0 O ON. L M r-1 0 w Ln O 00 M Ln O a) I* O O u ♦O^ J (.O r-I v } N M M r-I N W w Q � V O F- o O Q r LL LU J N U ry V O N 0 _ Q o Q M (D _ V W ...... .... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ................ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... z 00 n O 00W LU'� z 2 Q � � o LLQ Z W LJJ o •v > M = F- U o N M o LU Q oC W H W Q a O C6 Cn U J CDv O O w O ( O c0 O p Q W z w a O � Q , QLL u c 06 4- p m N 0 o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL r O r-1 O I� 00 CV CV N I� O N (.0 r-1 O C/') w O � l0 M Rt O lD � � CV r-1 00 I� Ln Ln Q °° � M N N N N r1 r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 O O O O co W u O Q r-1 rq 1.0 lD O 00 M O O M M � 00 M rl Lu M N 00 M N o0 � r- � O o0 lD M o0 I� 0 V 00 00 00 lD m q�t qc:j- q::1- M N N rl rl LLLI W LL Q \ \ O O O O QD kD O �D Ln r- 0 n Q O 0 a) Ln I, O r-i Ln 0(� F- rn M ci o C Q N W U N O ON N Q m L`nn L mn � ~ N W U or ro rn I� N r rr M aQ Q_ N r-1 r-1 � L N co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N >> O cD °r° °4 ,n° � Ln o 0o m O O CDG ~ 4 M � rl O O O 0- H u 00 00 m rn 00 Q w omo 1Z r M rn �j N Q 00 N LL Lu m 00 l0 M LL Q 0 LU O0w w a- U Ln M o o Ln O X 0 m w w Q Q Q Q � � r- m 0 � w o o M Ln 0 (00 000 Co Ln 0 Ln CD Ln o rl r1 r-I O r-I 1 00 �D N O M Ln Ln Ln l0 O Ln Ln O Ln N O w w ~ m a> m CO m al U U Q M U DC Q Q Q Q O Q Q 2) Q Q r-I M � OwCQQ M � � m hoc = = zoo = ,azzzz � zzQzz > > < Q w Q w w I- w U C1 M U cn Ln 0 w 0 0 0 U U U U LL U U C7 C� Q 2 M Z - OO : C6 � r-I I M to I O M I N ern N j 0) N N O O N Ln I� M O � m cV LU U') 0 r-I r-I I� to N r-I N N r r-I r-I r-I c-I r-I i U c LU p (o U o O 0 o auo 0 o � o LL U u QLU DC CO p J 0 V) C �LU r-I G = LU i o O 0 o aA In In cv ca M O U 'w J LU w r1 .... Q U i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F- O ago I� m (V O fV � r-I r-I r-I 0 0 � Ql r1 n L qq M 0 0 0 0 Q Q r � U RC* 0 0 010 0 0 0 J N ry V O N O Q - � M I� cM Q O (, w �p M I� M O M M cV M = � - L.L. '^ C� 0 W 4-7 LU W m 4- o OR � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 O t]A �1 00 00 r-I 00 I� I� N r-I 00 r-I . z z W -0-0, +v-+ N O N Ln DD l� M M M O O � .0 — m N 00r-i � M O 6 6 6 0 0 0 ca z H W 0 U) z _ � 0 n r-I w Ln •o C: LU (/)- U 0C 00 to r-I to N M q;T Ln N L r `� I f 4 N CV r-I 00 00 N q (� ° w M a Q l0 N r- N U oC LU � t6 06 0 O 0 j N (1) L- p m H 4- 0 0 \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 a LL r O aio �o �o rn a) N M r-I LL w H a o � m fV N N o 0 J Q W m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � m V 0 p QF. Q �o In N O O (> �7 � N rn rn r-I •> 00 O c (a W LU i O 0 n a o a,o � U Q) � 0 0 QN W U O 0 N N � Q a 0 M ti N W U o a Q co 0 L >I 0o ao 0 D LL ca U -------------- -------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ .. .. Q w .. 00 � O Q mLQ0 0 D WLLJ w O W W O Q DC U Q w In 0 In > N `� w (Z w 00 w O Q Q .. U Vn U N O N OL W 00 cal 0 a- N Ln O O W W Q a- 'n M In cr w � In O N N w M In �o corm W N Ol Ol W W H i m Q cn Q U Q to t M O r-I 0 r-I O N 0 U INn z 0 — 11J Q z w a z = z Q O U P q Q cv U fV r-I qq 0� D� Q Q w w U U U m C7 J V U m U 0 V a C7 to DC cn = w m Q m 0- 0- 0 0 Q Z _ m O C� ~ O � m m r- N O 00 0 +� M z 0 l0 N r-I r-I l0 N N L.n N ; w (D U CU w U o m oU) O O0 o 0 •- rn N rn ~ U u O Q LU CU oC m o J o w >- o rj � m= w X CU p o o 0 0 0 0 0 o Q O t o `� l0 al m N r-I r-I r-I o N N O N O �n to to C6 ro U N r-I m r-I O 00 O C6 L(') -- L LI J m � r, N z II 00 Q0 N r-I r-I l0 N N M 00 � ° M ti w ` ° � - LO r) a o N0 Q U r v O II 00 � J N U) P'-- Lr) ry V N O Ln 00 ° Q O Lr) (D w + N W M = m Z W U O �' o O ° v o ff o a,°o a) - `0 CU ' .. - O }' ca w o � o (D C/) 'U0 z z W I-.- u `o O lU T LU W C�H - ]r4� � O j H O � U O D LU 0 LL <+� U p N < 000 N N ' Nzm CDoZ N z� F— L) `- ° -0 W LLI O LL w Oao z 7 Q o � 00 J QU CU N 4-0 u �� W IZ— >, N mm 2 70 •U) 0- � O o n � °)O Lo '> Q O Ca O O H +r LL m W Z L o E � � � U W o t°o W CU V � o 'Q p CU - LL O Q N W U C6 _N O U C o a � a)p O N •� CU (B ti N U m coE J (3) 0 C) Q a) Q m N (� L N 06 3: U) M6 N p MU 70 o � CU >, O � nj >>I Ma \ +a o0 0 _ X 0 U- U N M6 ' U � 10ro N i CU w co . 00Wp Q °� o -0 a) W a) cn z LL o c6 O 0L O LU � W a C: LLI W Q o 00 o w Q m L- Q p m m L u I� l0 to w r-I O t•n cc U m W W p r-I ,n ri to r-i r-i U r- c° L L- CL N Q Q w U H LL U U LL LL � t) Ln L7 :3 a U PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4 PROPOSED FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1, 2020—SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AEDT AC TYPE AC/AT J ET AC/AT GENERAL AVIATION MI LI7:RY Grand PROP GA GA .. Tota I GA PR MI L HEM J ET 1 H E L0 r�i. rr arr�mi r arr i �rtarrr m rtarrr f �aarrtarn r an i( r arr�mi �'v EM B175 91656 0 0 0 0 0 0 91656 A319-131 71242 0 0 0 0 0 0 71242 EMB170 3,401 0 0 0 0 0 0 31401 EMB190 917 0 0 0 0 0 0 917 737700 238 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... EMB145 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 CRJ9-ER 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 DHC8 0 3,096 0 1 0 22EA DHC6 0 1,817 0 931 0 40 CNA208 0 1,299 0 11247 0 0 0 SD330 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 202 SF340 0 142 0 0 0 34 0 176 DHC830 0 37 0 11 0 0 0 48 LEAR35 0 0 11424 0 0 1 0 11425 CNA510 0 0 11314 0 0 0 0 11314 CNA500 0 0 948 0 0 0 0 948 CNA560XL 0 0 916 0 0 0 0 916 CNA680 0 0 877 0 0 0 0 877 CL600 0 0 736 0 0 0 0 736 CNA560U 0 0 583 0 0 0 0 583 CNA55B 0 0 503 0 0 0 0 503 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... FAL900EX 0 0 503 0 0 0 0 503 CNA750 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 433 CNA560E 0 0 416 0 0 0 0 416 GV 0 0 282 0 0 2 0 285 GIV 0 0 255 0 0 0 0 255 IA1125 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 198 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... M U3001 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 183 ECLI PSE500 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 165 C525C 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 129 CIT3 0 0 103 0 0 0 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..........................................................Effi ........... CNA525C 0 0 102 0 0 0 BD-700-1A10 0 0 77 0 0 0 GIIB 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 LEAR25 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Page 13 of 14 Page C-40 PREPARED BY: Deborah Lagos, Deborah Murphy Lagos &Associates PREPARED FOR: Peter M. Green, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA ORL ADO DATE: PREPARED: February 17, 2022 DATE AMENDED: May 5, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION TABLE 4(CONT'D) PROPOSED FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1, 2020—SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AEDT AC TYPE AC/AT J ET AC/AT GEN ERAL AVIATION MILITARY jan PROP GA GA JET GAPROP HELDMIL MI L HELOGASEPV 0 0 0 7,986 0 15 0 CNA182 0 0 0 61699 0 0 0 61699 BEC58P 0 0 0 214587 0 0 0 21587 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... PA30 0 0 0 114247 0 0 0 11247 CNA441 0 0 0 312 0 0 0 312 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..........................................................Eff ......................... DHC-2FLT 0 0 0 239 0 0 239 CNA206 0 0 0 133 0 0 133 PA42 0 0 0 112 0 0 112 GASEPF 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 135 D0328 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 27 DC3 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 5 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... 1900D 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 S76 0 0 0 0 11764 0 0 11764 R44 0 0 0 0 1,468 0 0 11468 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... SA355F 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 186 B206 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 142 EC130 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 114 M D600 N 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 B212 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 A109 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... B429 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 C130E 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 115 T-38A 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 70 F5 E 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 27 C17 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 C560 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 F15E20 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 F18AF 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 ..................................................... .......................................................... .......................................................... ..................................................................................................................... KC135R 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 S70 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 55 S65 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 31 Grand Total 21,563 6,593 10,161 21,674 31698 351 88 64,128 Sources: OPSNET,2021, FlightRadar24,2022. Prepared by: Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates Page 14 of 14 Page C-41 �eborarah.M ueplwy !.ago*,e.,r Amoo6ate400 LLC Monday, August 29, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Peter M. Green, AICP Environmental Protection Specialist Orlando Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 8427 SouthPark Circle Orlando, Florida 32819 RE: Key West International Airport Noise Exposure Maps Update Comparison of Aircraft Operations Data FFY 2021 to Most Recent 12 Months Dear Peter: The assumptions and activity levels used to develop the Existing Condition NEM are based on data from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. Since this data is not for a timeframe representing the year of submission, an analysis of data generated for the most recent twelve months (August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022) was prepared. The purpose of this analysis is to confirm that there has been no change in operation at the airport that would create any substantial new noncompatible uses or significantly reduce noise over noncompatible uses. The attached document describes the analysis that was undertaken. Your approval of this document is requested, so that Draft NEM Update document can be made available for public review. Sincerely, Deborah Lagos President xc: Richard Strickland, Director of Airports 566 Running Deer Trail Waynesville,NC 28786 P:727.631.1553 deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com co M O rl O M X !� }, N M o W }' m V- � CL N � O O N O - �-0 O z E M o Z 0 O 0 It N w u) Q N Nr..7 r- 0) w _0 U re. O _0 Z L - Q O o LL u -0 0 00 Q L � O J 00 C/) � O O U L t/� W U Cl) •% M N p s z �, }' z N , 00 }+ , to a_ E O O O Co ~ O O9 Q � � co c ti o p W N O o a. o J 3: E -500 O c� cD C� ° o LL Z _0 cn O Q O V Cn 0 � i o L� i O 4.O W m c0 V- LO LO _ Co W .— L LO � �--0 Co — M ra .� v a) O C 00 � >, O a Z � z TO u) U) p LL o o N cyi cyi w � U L.L Z - co co O �o o z N +r Q .— x (3) N M N Q LO 00 N � —J C 0 O M w E a� E LL CO p 00cn O p LL O Co V C� o w O Q E ca rn00 3 c6 ^N O V N ' '® ONO O U ca SUN Co U Co o p Q N cn U) Q .2 u N p N N N 0S i cy) CV O N N N O L O co � _ U �L LL L � Z O U) _ N oN IZ- : NCU O m 0) 70 D L CU ~ O a � CU W Q M L.L mc Z Co NW •_ • CU N z H O N O �O p p70 04 C: NO N L Q Q ca ca . 0 pCY) 0 Q v � � 0 2 U ° 0- It N 75; O N U O � N � 0) N � O N W � 0) oo � '� ,>_ N �0 Co Co� + a)N N z O o O � O N (� W � 0 N Q U co4-0 � (� Q U C6 4-0 2: 0 .� '— O se O4-0 M M M (_� a) a) (o Cl) Cl) •� O N to 0 i '> — O -� zo � � ( � co w a, w N � O ca No W w LLI o L- = }' =3 O co O O N O Q � N Ni CV U N Ln ,� C� Ln Q N o o _O 0 E 'O aw) W m m N N Co Q cm -0 : p a� Z W W ', 'O C O M E N � D 0 � 0 a v E a) p W a� Co O m mcooco CDC5 co 42 CD cn U (n U W W •— N aJ Q O O W o 'U c W C � O Q cn W CD o co co O N a �+ Q J O O OC W � � o LL Q U V O }' = = � 0 CD � � O � m Z cfl o 0 � .� � � fn �--� � .v coQ O CMo N N O Q O � a) O .0 W to v U m W X U co O (D o cn w Q O O ,� -O V co co � N N Q a) Q z N —O � Q ,}O�� n O L � � cFlo ,— cnn r }' 0 ti m O w -O N � O > co N , CD W O '� N _� o o N m N -0 LLI N (6 N o O N ~ � Oco 0 C) � Q M M 00 N •� O N p 0 U N � Q +� ti o o O E cn Q ") p Q c - p N � }' ca E 'O O uj c N 'X O — cn O E ca H N C6 -0 '- 0 O cn +-0 C� C� NO N o O O N 'c� N � � o w �' � � � c� Z O � Q 0- Q >+ vi 0000 Q 'c6 •V O (� N O 0 L N M }, N O LL � O O �a) m ' O v C� •— N CN O L O O 0 m 0 Co � O Co Q U COco J Q a O N N J p .0 .V ~ O O Co `~ Q CU cn a� N O U � V) N v � N N U N E N N �- M Q .� W N cn — •— Q Q co N N E � Q Q U � N U 'U 'CD U 2 F- H U) 0- Q L- F -0 -0 -� Ln ro c U OIZ- aca aA U O U N � O � w V) 4-0 w U � � p0 O cu � U U w 4-0ar- m o C: p p O V) i Q ti (a co O -r- r) 4--0 Q � J � ry ate+ O Q Q 0 �-% Q _� C/) � � U O � Ln U Q � '� OU X w Q � a)Ln m CD ob L 'o 0 n ccnn z CD c0 J � J N 4-0 Z .— O > O (� uiCN L OWN 4 .� p U C:)N m cn � QCoa) O C N }' Co L L a) U ate-+ a) L ^� a) cn Q A Co -0 C/) O o= N � O L O O (D +-0 Q L L � N Q Q CL O N L N N O L L Ca O U a_ a - DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX D DOCUMENTATION OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETINGS D.1 INTRODUCTION During the NEM Update, the Committee met on the following dates to discuss issues related to the NEM Update: • October 6, 2020 0 December 7, 2021 • December 1, 2020 0 March 1, 2022 • March 2, 2021 • June 7, 2022 • June 1, 2021 0 October 4, 2022 • October 5, 2021 For each meeting, the following documentation is included in this appendix: • Meeting Agenda • Meeting Minutes • Presentation regarding NEM Update • Proof of Publication Page D-1 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm2 October 6, 2020 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-2 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, October 6t", 2020 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/98217483690. You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID# 982-1748-3690. Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. March 5t"1 2019 2. October 11t, 2019 3. Marsh 3rd1 2020 B. Award of FAA Grant 37-61-2020 in the amount of $4,958,363.00 1. Construction of KWBTS Building A - Part 1 2. Construction management & administration of KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 3. Preparation of final bid documents and bid process for KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 4. Noise Exposure Maps Update 5. Airport Noise Program Coordinator Services C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. Building C Construction Update 2. Building A - Phase 1 Bid Opening & Contract Award 3. Building A - Phase 1 Construction Schedule 4. Building A - Phase 2 Finalize Bid Documents and Bid 5. Richard Strickland's Proposed Use of Funds Remaining in Grant 37-59-2019 ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Page D-3 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, October 6', 2020 Page 2 of 2 D. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports E. Discussion of Meeting Schedule for 2021 F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - S:DO p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Page D-4 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:12 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Peter Horton Marlene burazo (via telephone) Dr. Julie Ann Floyd (via telephone) Nick Pontocorvo Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML & A, Noise Program Coordinator (via Zoom) Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager Bud Griner, EYW ATCT Manager Robert Gold, Old Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Rashon Lyons, Las Salinas Condominiums Property Manager (via Zoom) Elizabeth Brady, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via telephone) Don & Gina Clifford, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowners (via telephone) Carolyn Winters, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) Andrew bulcey, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) Zsuzsanna Rivera, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via telephone) Dave & Pam Meck, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowners (via telephone) Petra Morum, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) Michael Sean Sullivan, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Michael Martin, Sunrise at Seaside Condominiums Homeowner A quorum was not present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the March 5th and October 1st, 2019 and March 3rd, 2020 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Since a quorum was not present, the minutes could not be approved. However, Deborah asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-5 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes Award of FAA Grant 37-61-2020 in the amount of $4,958,363.00 Deborah briefly described the following projects that are included in the new grant: 1. Construction of KWBTS Building A - Part 1 2. Construction management & administration of KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 3. Preparation of final bid documents and bid process for KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 4. Noise Exposure Maps Update 5. Airport Noise Program Coordinator Services Noise Exposure Maps Update Deborah outlined the tasks required to complete the NEM Update: • Notify § 150.21 (b) "Consulted Parties" • Update Aircraft Operations Data • Validate Flight Tracks and Utilization • Update Land Use, Zoning, Population, and Housing Data • Update GIS Databases and Mapping • Review Forecast Developed for the Airport Master Plan • develop Existing Condition Noise Contours • Develop Future Condition Noise Contours • Evaluate Impacts within Noise Contours • Update NCP Program Areas • Provide Opportunities for Public Review and Comment • Submit Documentation to the FAA She went on to describe the "Consulted Parties" in more detail and explained that a letter would be sent out shortly notifying these parties that the NEM Update was beginning. She also explained the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Robert Bold asked what the process would be and whether it will be a public process. Pam Meck asked if information would be posted on the Ad Hoc Committee website. Deborah explained that progress reports would be provided to the committee at each meeting, and information that has been approved by the FAA would be posted on the website. Interim and/or deliberative information would not be posted. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-6 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes Deborah explained that two sets of noise contours must be generated, one to represent the "existing" condition and the other to represent a "future" condition that must be at least f ive years out f rom the year the report is submitted to the FAA. So, the years would probably be 2020 and 2026. Peter Horton indicated that contours representing 2020 would be very narrow because of the reduced number of operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regina Clifford suggested using 2019 operations instead of 2020. Deborah mentioned that if we can use the aircraft operations forecast developed in the Master Plan, the future contours should be OK. She said she must discuss this with the FAA. Discussion of NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi provided a Power Point Presentation including the following items: 1. KWBTS Building C Construction Update 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 Bid Opening & Contract Award 3. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 Construction Schedule 4. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Finalize Bid Documents and Bid 5. Proposed Use of Remaining Grant Funds in Grant 37-59-2019 A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Marlene Durazo asked if we had considered COVID delays in obtaining materials. Steve indicated we did not experience any delays during the Building C construction and were not anticipating any for Building A. Peter Horton was surprised that the FAA allowed us to include a contingency in the bid. Steve explained that is actually a line item dollar amount that is f ixed in the bid sheet by the NIP Management Team, so the contractor does not bid that amount, and that is why the FAA is OK with it. Peter thought that was a great way to handle it. Other Reports Noise Hotline and Contact Loa Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Ten (10) calls to the Hotline o Two (2) repeat callers • Three (3) calls directly to DML&A o Inquiring about participation in the NIP • Two (2) emails directly to DML&A Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-7 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes Airport Noise Report The following articles were discussed: • Vol 32, No. 16 o Electric Commercial Aircraft o eVTOL o High Mach Commercial Aircraft • Vol 32, No. 17 o Delta retires the last MD-88 and MD-90 • Vol 32, No. 19 o SST Noise Standards o Quiet Supersonic Technology • Vol 32, No. 20 o CIA must pay $33M for violation of noise levels • Vol 32, No. 22 o H.R. 2 — 116th Congress: Moving Forward Act o Establish a program to provide incentives to reduce airplane emissions and noise by transitioning commercial fleets to newer, quieter, less- polluting aircraft o Increases current AIP noise funding for airports from $3.35 to $4.0 Billion per year for FY'21 -FY'25 o Authorizes supplemental funding for airports o Authorizes additional funding for the FAA's Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels & Environment o This bill passed in the House on July 1, 2020 and was received in the Senate on July 20, 2020 • Vol 32, No. 23 o South FL Metroplex Project • Vol 32, No. 24 o Use of Spaciotemporal Population Data • Vol 32, No. 26 o Aviation must think 'strategically' on improving public engagement on noise o Stage 3 Phaseout would provide limited noise reduction • Vol 32, No. 27 o H.R. 7616 — 116th Congress Dept. of Transportation Appropriations Act, 2021 o $500M for Discretionary AIP (which includes noise) (President's budget request for Discretionary AIP was $0.00) Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-8 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes o Priority consideration to applications to complete previously awarded projects o Homes insulated prior to 1993 should be considered "unmitigated" o This bill was introduced in the House on July 16, 2020; it has not been passed • Vol 32, No. 28 o AIP Noise Grants - City of Key West? No, Monroe County o ACRP Report #221 - Measuring Quality of Life in Communities Surrounding Airports • Vol 32, No. 29 o H.R. 7617 - 116 th Congress Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2021 ■ $50M to fund mitigation for military aircraft noise ■ Primarily driven by introduction of F-35 jets ■ This bill passed in the House on July 31, 2020, was received in the Senate on August 12, 2020, and referred to the Committee on Appropriations for consideration • Vol 32, No. 30 o Members of Congressional Quiet Skies Caucus Displeased with FAA's Report to Congress ■ Re-evaluate alternative metrics to ONL ■ Re-evaluate UNL 65 dB standard Discussion of Meeting Schedule for 2021 Since a quorum was not present, the schedule could not be off icially approved. However, everyone agreed with the proposed dates: • March 2, 2021 • June 1, 2021 • October 5, 2021 • December 7, 2021 Any Other Discussion Robert bold explained he lives directly under the straight-in approach path to Runway 09, near the cemetery. He would like to see more of the VFR and discretionary IFR air traf f ic use alternate approach paths. He of f ered the f ollowing: • Scheduling has prevented me f rom attending several meetings. Glad that we are meeting virtually, and hope that will continue. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-9 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes • While I appreciate the importance of the NIP, that is not the only issue that this group has considered in the past. • My neighbors are still concerned about arrival noise. In particular, the straight in approach via CHETS / ATNAW / BUSBY to runway 9 is the path that takes commercial IFR traf f ic over the most residential properties possible for any approach to the threshold to runway 9. • In my earlier participation in Ad Hoc meetings, I made a case for 'spreading the pain' by encouraging VFR traf f ic to consider Garrison Bight and Fort Zach approaches instead of the straight in approach. Much traf f ic arriving from the eastern seaboard via the Garrison Bight would save considerable fuel compared with the straight-in approach. • Earlier assurances were given that NOTAMs and other guidance would encourage (but not require) avoiding the straight-in approach. From my layman's perspective, it does not appear that any voluntary measures are being promoted. What notices would a pilot planning to arrive at EYW receive regarding voluntary approach pattern distribution? • We previously received arrival track maps that showed the concentration of arrivals on the straight-in path. Are more current arrival track maps available? Can they be broken down by VFR and IFR? Commercial vs. GA? A ircraf t type? • I reiterate my earlier offers to serve on this board to represent the community, especially those in Old Town, and am disappointed that I was not invited to f ill openings that have occurred. Bud Griner explained that ATC gives clearance for short approaches when they are requested by the pilot. Nick Pontecorvo explained that the cemetery is only one mile from the threshold, and larger aircraft are unlikely to turn onto their final approach closer in than that. He also mentioned there are copies of the "handout/brochure" describing the Noise Abatement Procedures available at Signature. Bud Griner mentioned that the website FlightRadar24 was an excellent source of information. Michael Martin, a Sunrise at Seaside Condominiums homeowner, asked if they were eligible for the NIP. When asked, he revealed the buildings were constructed in 2000. Steve and Deborah shared the FAA's policy that noncompatible structures must have been built prior to October 1, 1998 to be eligible. Michael Sullivan, a Las Salinas Condominiums homeowner, asked why they were not eligible for the NIP since their building was constructed in 1990. Peter Horton explained that when he was Assistant County Administrator in 1990, Art Skelley was the Airport Manager. Art wrote a letter to Bob Butler, the developer of Las Salinas, informing him that if he proceeded to build, the residents would not be eligible for Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-10 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 6'. 2020 Meeting Minutes noise mitigation, and encouraged him to disclose the proximity to the airport and the likelihood of aircraft noise and overflights. Several Las Salinas Condominium homeowners, as well as the property manager Rayshon Lyons, voiced their opinion that Las Salinas should be eligible, since Bob Butler did not disclose the situation, and many of the current owners were not the original owners. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:05 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 7 October 61 2020 Page D-11 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 61 2020 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ili 'Key West International i Meetingof th Ad Hoc Comml*ttee on Noise Tuesday, 6 , 2020 1 Noise Exposure Maps Update InternationalAirport KeyWest • Notify§ 150.21(b)"Consulted Parties" • Update Aircraft Operations Data • Validate Flight Tracks and Utilization • Update Land Use,Zoning,Population,and Housing Data • Update GIS Databases and Mapping • Review Forecast Developed for the Airport Master Plan • Develop Existing Condition Noise Contours • Develop Future Condition Noise Contours • Evaluate Impacts within Noise Contours • Update NCP Program Areas • Provide Opportunities for Public Review and Comment • Submit Documentation to the FAA 2 Page D-12 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 61 2020 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. § 150.21 (b) "Consulted Parties" KeyWest Intern.ationalAirport • Agencies whose area,or any portion of whose area,of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB noise contour • State agencies(e.g.,FDOT,SFWMD,FDEP,SHPO) • Public agencies(e.g.,City of KW,Monroe Co,KW Art&Historical Society) • Planning agencies(e.g.,City of KW Planning Dept,Monroe Co Growth Management Division,South Florida Regional Planning Council) • Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) • Orlando Airports District Office(ADO) • Air Traffic Organization(ATO) • Southern Region • Other Federal Officials having local responsibility for land uses • US Navy,NOAA • Regular Aeronautical Users of the airport • Airlines,Signature Flight Support,KW Seaplane Tours,FedEx,etc. 3 Noise ExposureMaps Update Public Participation KeyWest The airport operator must of ford interested persons adequate opportunityto submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 4 Page D-13 �vrlVii m I °�I Idol i II u I 'r uullllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll I DRAFT DOCUMENT ulululu' '' SUBJECT TO REVISION DailyJLI The Florida Keys Only Key West spaper,Est 1876 PO Box pg p �n 33041 ,, r.219 legals@keysnews,.com PUBLISHER'SMONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS KEY WEST FL 33040 Account'. 141789 Ticket: 358033 NOTICESTATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MONROE IS HEREBY GIVEN MAY CONCERN Day of September 2020 that a meetingIII be held of personallyBefore the undersigned authority is i Airports InternationalAD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE Key West Roosevelt3491 S. is Monroe County will host a Public Meet- Key West,FL 33040 i 1 Citizen October of the Key West Citizen,a it at the newspaper published in Key West,in Monroe County, Florida,that the attached HMVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER beingcopy of advertisment, legal notioe in r of MEETING 10.6 was 1200 Truman Avenue published in saidnewspaper in the issues of: Upstairs in the Commission Chambers Key West Flodda 33040 Sunday, September 20,2020 AND via a virtual meeting connection Affiant further says that the Key West Citizen is a newspaper published in Key Persons interested in this issue r invit- West, in said Monroe County, Florida and that the said newspapers has hereto- to attend.Persons wishing fore been continuously published in saidr rida every day,and electronically can participate mjb2g.z2gm.vj4Q62jj4UW. The has been entered as pehodicals matter at the post office in Key West, in saidpublic can alsoparticipate i County,Monroe Florida,for a period of 1 year next precedingI li and,i only) y dialing of the attached copy of t$ when requested,enter the Web!- r r I -1 a neitherr r corporation any discount, rebate, 1 t � � t l l r I irlic i tadvisedthat some �r of the members of the Monroe tio the sai news er. County Commission, the Commission/ Council members and/or their appoint- ed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon, Key Colony Beach, (Signaturethe Village of Islamorada, representatives of the TouristDevelop- ment Council and their area DistrictAd- AffirmedM' ° m, t l is i t t tiro n discuss items that may c before their respective commis- sions,councils, r i boards. PublicPursuant to SectionFlorida Statutes, notice is given that if a per- son decided to appeal any decision made y the Board with respect y Publicr r considered s ri s r meet! s, ill c rthe roc i s t, for such commissionitpose, he may need to ensure verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes testi- mony an i c is ap- Personally Known X ProducedIdentification peal is to be based. ADA Assistance. Any individual Identificationr ing special cc s at this meeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office, at( 1Monday Fri- Notary ( l i holidays), hours f 8:30 a.m. . later th five( s prior �a the scheduledmeeting;if you arehear- my inq or voice impaired, l 1 Page D-14 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm3 December 1 , 2020 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-15 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, December 1 St, 2020 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/97935507009. You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID# 979-3550-7009. Roll Call Sign In A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. March 5t"1 2019 2. October 11t, 2019 3. March 3"d1 2020 4. October 6t"1 2020 B. Discussion Regarding Environmental Assessment 1. Purpose & Need 2. Proposed Action 3. Environmental Resources to be Considered 4. 2019 Noise Contours 5. 2024 Noise Contours 6. 2029 Noise Contours 7. Notice of Availability for Draft Environmental Assessment and Public Workshop (See Pages 22-24 of agenda package) ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "7I1". Page D-16 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, December 11t, 2020 Page 2 of 2 C. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Review of Most Recent 24 Months of Aircraft Operations 2. A "Quick & Dirty" Analysis 3. Consulted Parties were notified. (See sample letter and distribution list on Pages 26-32 of agenda package.) 4. Public Participation D. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. Building C Project Summary 2. Building A - Phase 1 Construction Update 3. Building A - Phase 2 Bid Strategy 4. Building A - Phase 2 Project Schedule 5. Letter to KWBTS Building A Property Owners (See Pages 43-46 of agenda package.) E. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports F. Discussion of Meeting Schedule for 2021 G. Other Discussion 1. Letter regarding additional construction at Ocean Walk Apts. ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (S) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Page D-17 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 1st, 2020 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:06 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Peter Horton Harvey Wolney Sonny Knowles Andrea Haynes Nick Pontocorvo Nat Harris (via Zoom) Marlene Durazo (via Zoom telephone) Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML & A, Noise Program Coordinator (via Zoom) Erick ULeon, Deputy Director of Airports Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager Michael Sullivan, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Dr. William Quillen, Las Salinas Condominium Association Board Member Elizabeth Brady, Las Salinas Condominium Association Board Member Rashon Lyons, Las Salinas Condominium Association Property Manager Peter Green, FAA (via Zoom) Robert Gold, Old Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Andrew bulcey, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) Beth Schreier Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) Jamie Caballero, Residential Property Manager (via Zoom) Maureen O'Brien, Key West Homeowner (via Zoom) Melissa Paul Leto, City of Key West Planning Department (via Zoom) Sandy, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner (via Zoom) A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 December 1,2020 Page D-18 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 1st, 2020 Meeting Minutes Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the March 5th and October lst, 2019, and March 6t" and October lst, 2020 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Marlene Durazo made a motion to approve the minutes; Andrea Haynes seconded the motion. The minutes were approved as presented. Discussion Regarding Environmental Assessment Deborah described the Proposed Action and the Purpose and Need, which is the justification for the project. She showed a slide listing the environmental resources to be considered, one of which is noise and compatible land use. Then she presented three slides illustrating the noise contours for the existing condition, 2024 no action and proposed action, and 2029 no action and proposed action. While these contours are not to be used for the NEM Update, they do provide a clue as to what those contours might look like. She pointed out how much smaller these contours are compared to the previous NEMs and commented that it is mostly because of the changes in the types of aircraft using the airport, rather than a reduction in the number of operations. Peter Green indicated that the FAA is coordinating with other agencies regarding the findings in the EA and any proposed mitigation. Marlene burazo asked if the project will have a negative impact on birds and was assured that it would not. The timing of the project was described as follows: the EA should be completed within the next couple months, then the projects will be designed, and funding will be sought; construction will occur after that. Noise Exposure Maps Update Deborah presented a slide showing airport operations over the past twenty-four months. Clearly the operations over the past twelve months have been negatively impacted by the pandemic but are starting to rebound. She mentioned that she is still working with the FAA to determine the operations to be used for modeling both the existing condition and the future condition. The FAA says we cannot ignore the impact of the pandemic, so we cannot use pre-pandemic numbers for the existing condition, and we cannot use the pre-pandemic forecast for the future condition. She presented a slide illustrating what she called a "quick and dirty" analysis just to get an idea of what we would be looking at if we used operations from 2020. These contours were compared to those developed for the EA based on 2019 operations. The 2020 contours were slightly smaller than the 2019, but not as bad as she expected. Peter Horton indicated that the contours do not serve the public in illustrating the impact they experience. Michael Sullivan stated these contours are Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 December 1,2020 Page D-19 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December Ist, 2020 Meeting Minutes inaccurate, and that sentiment was shared by many others in attendance. A lengthy discussion followed, including questions regarding field noise measurements, flight tracks, and number of operations. Deborah assured the committee that the NEM Update was being prepared in accordance with all FAA guidelines and requirements and would be as accurate as possible. Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Discussion of NIP Implementation Deborah Lagos presented a Power Point Presentation, prepared by Steve Vecchi, including the following items: 1. KWBTS Building C - Project Summary 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 Construction Update 3. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Bid Strategy 4. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Project Schedule A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Other Reports Noise Hotline and Contact Loa Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Four (4) calls from one caller to the Hotline regarding low-f lying aircraft f lying over La Brisa - UML failed to include in previous report. • One (1) call directly to DML&A about 12th Ave, Stock Island overflights • One (1) call regarding generator noise • Two emails to ()ML&A about NIP participation Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 December 1,2020 Page D-20 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 1st, 2020 Meeting Minutes Airport Noise Report The following articles were briefly discussed: • FAA approves P-150 Update Addressing Noise from F-35 Jets Now Based at BVT. Vermont Gas Co. to Provide Local Matching Funds. (Vol. 32, Nos. 31 & 35) • Vol. 32, No. 32 • Effects of Aviation Noise on Human Health • Aviation Noise During COVID Lockdown • RDU and PTI Land Use Regulations (Vol. 32, No. 33) • Electric Aircraft (Vol. 32, Nos. 31, 34, and 35) • SSTs (Vol. 32, Nos. 31 & 36) Discussion of Meeting Schedule for 2021 Peter Horton made a motion to approve the schedule; Nick Pontecorvo seconded the motion. The schedule was approved as presented. Any Other Discussion Several representatives from Las Salinas Condominiums voiced their opinion that Las Salinas should be eligible for the NIP. Peter Horton encouraged them not to lose hope, it took a lot of time and effort to get KWBTS approved. He mentioned that use of the DNL 60 dB contour, rather than the [)NL 65, might happen in the future. Peter Horton made a motion to adjourn; Nick Pontecorvo seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:10 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 December 1,2020 Page D-21 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 1, 2020 SUBJECT TO REVISION K, ey West International Aiirport '� II pa i pil mr� Meetingof th Ad Hoc Committee on Noise Tuesday, I-st, 1 Noise Exposure Maps KeyWest Intern dional Airport ATADS Airport Itinerant Local Air Air General Total Date j Carrier Taxi Aviation Military Total Civil Military Total Operations Nov.18 1,12.1 430 2,532 35 4,118 338 6 344 4,462 Dec 18J 1,32.4 454 2,457 53 4,288 346 0 346 4,634 Jan.19 1,42.0 538 2,314 24 4,296 326 6 3321 4,628 Feb.19 1,422 533 3,060 42 5,057� 358 16 374 5,431 Isar 19 1,743 524 3,599 53 5,919 248 16 2..64� 6,183 Apr 19 1,398 453 3,098 36 4,985 162 2 164 5,149 May..1 1 1,296 401 2.,667 51 4,415ff 100 0 100 4,515 ,.)an•••1 9 1,112 320 2,178 90 3,700I 146 0 146f 3,846 Jtul-19J 1,164 303 2,329 28 3,824 222 8 230� 4,054 Sep 19 1,008 250 1,355 14 2,627� 148 0 148 ,775 2,315 �... Oct 19 1 221 388 2,278 45 1,932 1,18 ,052 Total: 15,299� 4,906� 29,475� 486k 50,166 2,820� 58� 2,878� 53,044 Nov-1 1 1,2.42. 426 2,519 36 4,2.23 192. 4 196 4,419 Dec 19 1,516 511 2,382 27 4,436 174 14 188 4,624 Jan 20 1,733 610,... 2,787 53 5,183 166 12 178 5,361 Feb 20 1,773 , I , Ma..20 1,548 375 1,000 45 3,877 78 20 98 4,137111111ff �154 4 158� 4,035 Apr...2 1 407 188 585 8 1,188 208 4 212j 1,400 May...20 284 243 789 8 1,324 186 4 190 1,514 Jun 20 609 438 2,274 24 3,345, 562 10 572� 3,917 Jul 20 923 367 2,032 25 3,3471 238 6 244 3,591 Aug 20 906 339 2,243 30 3,518 176 4 180 3,698 Sep-2D�,�f 789 355 1,864 21 3,029 142 8 1F50 :3,179 ;d 2C1 1,035 395 2,138 21 3,589u 180 5 185 3,774 Total: 12,765� 4,800� 24,209� 326k 42,100� 2,450 90 2,551 44,651 Report(..;rooted on Mon IVov 23 11,13,04 8:::.S f 2020 Sources:Air Fraffic Activity System(A FADS} Page D-22 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December 11 2020 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. 2019 FOR EA OCT 2019 s SEPT 2020 SCALE FACTOR KeyWest ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... InternationalAirport Air Carrier/Air Taxi 20,113 17,7 General Aviation 32,419 26,743 0.82 Military 520 442 0.85 TOTAL 53,052 44,929 0.85 � V j�E!u V I (fo d,. I( �� I U///t//J`O 1y�V iNi, � .. , ,/'rrc�,✓i,ii„i�i.,„„,iii, ��,,,,,� r',�w, ��,h'�Iq„' I �/�.. ��I�� 4N 9r Nr dlf»i I aG ii�� r l %; rrrrrrr!J 4 ul r in�rf t�W�ivi iiiiii i,rf Jrariri r �� I ''� 1 � %� f 3 Noise ExposureMaps Update Public Participation KeyWest InternationalAirport The airport operator must of ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 4 Page D-23 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Your ad Ad shown is not actual print size i i I� r� � �i�' � ��D�� I i � NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT Key West Citizen-Florida Free Press-Paradise MAY CONCERN The Daily Reflector-The Daily Advance-The Rocky Mount Telegram that a meeting will be held of Bertie Ledger-Chowan Herald-Duplin Times-Farmville Enterprise-Perquimans Weekly Standard Laconic-Tarboro Weekly-Times Leader-Williamston Enterprise KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE PO Box 1967 Greenville NC 27835-(252)329-9500 REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 49 CFR TITLE 14 PART 150 Date: November 19, 2020 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Monroe County will host a Public Meeting on - CLASSIFIED AD PROOF — Tuesday,December 1st,2020 at 2:00 p.m. at the Thank you for advertising with us! This is the f of ad scheduled to run on the HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER y g proof your sc 1200 Truman Avenue dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact Sue Stamper by phone Upstairs in the Commission Chambers at or email at sstamper@keysnews.com. Key West,Florida 33040 AND via a virtual meeting connection at CUSTOMER INFORMATION https://mcbocc.zoom.us/i/97935507009 Persons interested in this issue are invit- Account#: 141789 ed to attend.Persons wishing to attend Name: MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS electronically can participate at https:// mcbocc.zoom.us/j/97935507009. The Address: 3491 S ROOSEVELT BLVD public can also participate via phone KEY WEST FL 33040 (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 Telephone: (305)809-5239 and,when requested, enter the Webi- nar ID#979-3550-7009. Email: leto-beth@monroecounty-fl.gov The public is further advised that some or all of the members of the Monroe County Commission, the Commission/ Council members and/or their appoint- ed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon, Key Colony Beach, AD INFORMATION Layton and the Village of Islamorada, representatives of the Tourist Develop- Ad ID: 367502 ment Council and their area District Ad- Run Dates: 11/22/20 to 11/22/20 visory Committee member may attend the meeting and discuss items that may come before their respective commis- Total Cost: $199.20 Account Rep: Sue Stamper sions,councils,or advisory boards. #of Inserts: 2 Phone#: (305)292-7777 Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida #of Lines: 83 Email: legals@keysnews.com Statutes, notice is given that if a per- Ad Class: 56 son decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings, he will need a record of the Publications Start Date End Date #of Insertions proceedings, and that, for such pur- pose, he may need to ensure that a Key West Citizen 11/22/20 11/22/20 1 verbatim record of the proceedings is KeysNews.com 11/22/20 11/22/20 1 made,which record includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. ADA Assistance: Any individual need- ing special accommodations at this meeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office, at(305)292-4441,Monday through Fri- day (excluding holidays), between the hours of 8:30 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.and no later than five(5)calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hear- ing or voice impaired,call"711". Dated at Key West, Florida this 21st Day of November 2020 Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd. Key West,FL 33040 11/21/20 Key West Citizen Page D-24 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION DA March 2, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-25 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, March 2"d,2021 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.u /_i/92220947320. You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID# 922-2094-7320. Roll Call Sign In A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. December 2nd1 2020 B. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Aircraft Noise: How we measure it and assess its impact 2. Aircraft Photos 3. Flight track data from FlightRadar24 4. Public Participation C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. Building A - Phase 1 Construction Update 2. Building A - Phase 2 Bid Schedule 3. Building A - Phase 2 Project Schedule �. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports E. Discussion / Nomination of an Ad-Hoc Committee Member to represent the community. F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "7I1". Page D-26 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 2"d, 2021 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:03 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates Peter Horton Sonny Knowles Andrea Haynes Nick Pontocorvo Nathaniel Harris Marlene Durazo Norma Faraldo (via Zoom) Dr. Julie Ann Floyd (via Telephone) Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML & A, Noise Program Coordinator (via Zoom) Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick U'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager George Webster, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Dr. William "Sandy" Quillen, Las Salinas Condominium Association Board Member Elizabeth Brady, Las Salinas Condominium Association Board Member Rashon Lyons, Las Salinas Condominium Association Property Manager Dori Baldwin, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Bruce Baldwin, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Deborah Scardina, New Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Robert Gold, Old Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Amanda Leggett, Executive Assistant to Craig Cates (via Zoom) Jackie Calvano, New Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Susan Phillips, Riviera Shores Homeowner (via Zoom) Roberta DePiero, New Town Homeowner (via Zoom) Kathleen Shackle, KWBTS (via Zoom) David Rooney, Old Town Homeowner (via Telephone) A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 March 21 2021 Page D-27 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 2"d, 2021 Meeting Minutes Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the December ist, 2020 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Marlene burazo made a motion to approve the minutes; Nat Harris seconded the motion. The minutes were approved as presented. Noise Exposure Maps Update Deborah presented a series of slides titled, "Aircraft Noise: How we measure it and assess its impact." She explained, step-by-step, how we get from the noise level we hear to the Day Night Average Sound Level (bNL) that is required by the FAA for the development of noise contours. She explained how the noise level and duration of each individual aircraft event, along with the time of day and number of events, are all used in the calculation of bNL. She mentioned that she is still working with the FAA to determine the operations to be used for modeling both the existing condition and the future condition. The FAA says we cannot ignore the impact of the pandemic, so we cannot use pre- pandemic numbers for the existing condition, and we cannot use the pre-pandemic forecast for the future condition. Deborah then presented a series of slides with photographs of the passenger and cargo aircraft operating at KWIA, and a map showing air carrier arrival flight tracks for January 1, 2020. She explained that she was just beginning to process the data, and this was just an example of the results. She indicated she would present additional data at the next meeting. She presented a slide illustrating what she called a "quick and dirty" analysis just to get an idea of what we would be looking at if we used operations from 2020. These contours were compared to those developed for the EA based on 2019 operations. The 2020 contours were slightly smaller than the 2019. Deborah reassured the committee that the NEM Update was being prepared in accordance with all FAA guidelines and requirements and would be as accurate as possible. Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 March 21 2021 Page D-28 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 2"d, 2021 Meeting Minutes NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Update 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 Construction Update 3. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Bid Process 4. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Project Schedule A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Other Reports Noise Hotline and Contact Loa Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • One email regarding new 6 AM departure • One email about NIP participation • Three calls regarding noisy aircraft • One call from Las Salinas about the NIP • One call regarding FedEx C208 f lying low over La Brisa. Airport Noise Report The following articles were briefly discussed: • County approves homes in the 65 contour of updated Noise Map it is ignoring (Vol. 32, No. 38) • Pilot Sound Insulation Program for properties impacted by military noise (Vo l. 32, No. 44) • 2/3 of people in 65 bNL are highly annoyed by aircraft noise (Vol. 33, No. 1) • Survey shows FAA's method to measure noise is deeply f lawed (Vol. 33, 4) • Quiet Skies Caucus members reintroduce aircraft noise bills (Vol. 33, Nos. 4 & 6) Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 March 21 2021 Page D-29 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 2"d, 2021 Meeting Minutes Discussion/Nomination of New Member Peter Horton nominated Robert Gold. Marlene Durazo nominated Karyn Shepherd, and read a brief bio stating she was a software engineer and lives at KWBTS. Andrea Haynes nominated Sandy Quillen. Robert Gold said he is a retired consultant (clients including Mitre Corp), has an MBA from Northwestern, and considers himself an "aviation groupie." Dr. William "Sandy" Quillen said he is a retired Commander from the US Navy, retired professor, a pilot, and serves as a Director on the Las Salinas Condominium Association Board. Nick Pontecorvo seconded the motion nominating Sandy Quillen. A Roll Call vote was taken by Deborah, and the following six committee members (all who were still in attendance) voted "Yes." Andrea Haynes, Nick Pontecorvo, Peter Horton, Marlene Durazo, Sonny Knowles, and Norma Faraldo. The nominee will be presented to the BOCC for confirmation. Other Discussion David Rooney spoke regarding the arrival path over Old Town and asked if there was any way the path could be varied from the "straight-in" approach, to provide some relief for folks living beneath that path. Peter Horton mentioned that in the past various approach paths have been tried (e.g., Garrison Bight, White Street Pier) but ended up causing more harm than good. Typically, air carrier arrivals are required to be on a stable, straight-in approach path prior to passing over the island's western boundary. Smaller aircraft can and do use a variety of approach paths, because they are frequently flying under Visual Flight Rules (VFR). Nat Harris mentioned that since 1992 there were to be no commercial flights between 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM. There has been increasing noise at La Brisa. Nick Pontecorvo quoted the following language from the FAA Airport/Facility Directory, "Extremely noise sensitive area. Urge no ops 0400-1200Z$. Use NBAA Noise Abatement procedures other times. Engine run-ups in designated area on Taxiway A between Taxiway A10 and Taxiway A11. 0400-1200Z$ (11:00 PM -7:00 AM Local Time). The military overflight last Saturday night was mentioned. Erick ULeon explained it was a C-17 that landed at EYW. It was an international arrival and needed fuel and customs so it could not land at NAS KW. Andrea Haynes made a motion to adjourn; Marlene Durazo seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:10 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 March 21 2021 Page D-30 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West ��- International Airport Meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee on Noise Tuesday, March 2nd, 2021 AIRCRAFT NOISE: HOW WE MEASURE IT AND ASSESS ITS IMPACT STEP 1:WHAT DID YOU HEAR? �IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!I!!!!!i ) JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJi ��`"y � IIIIIIIIII i �uuiuuuuuu luuuuui Ill�ll�l�lllrllp��iMaximum A319 Aircraft Noise � y �.�. i�l� uuwlllllll ackground Noise Level u a. .,y 2 Page D31 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION umwow i � Vpm puwiiw ill- Vuw uuuoou III ASS uuuooi uuooi uuull� uuuw�w wu ioo '�IIIIIwwwV I � SiV S ITS uoi�u.Vwwuup �i,. Illlllluuuuu IIIIII � �� uuuuuu uumw � �� uu �V ��IIIII uuuuuu uuuuuu i � � ououm uuuuuu ioouuu Rocket Launch Shotgun Blast Firecrackers Popping Balloon Sloppy Joe's with Live Band Stadium Crowd with Maximum Cheering Large Thunderclap Emergency Siren Leaf Blower Chainsaw Airboat Handheld Drill Weed eater ltltllltlttlltlttlltlttlltlttlltlttlltlttlltlt`Iltlttlltlttlltlf Scooter Riding Lawnmower Duval Street During Fantasy Fest Hair Blow Dryer Blender Coffee Grinder Garbage Disposal Vacuum Cleaner Toilet Flush Normal Conversation Electric Toothbrush J1� /1 1 Refrigerator �� Dishwasher Whisper Light Rain Normal Breathing Pin Dropping Threshold of Hearing for a Healthy Young Person 3 luuwuw i III11111111111110W WE i Il iww E IT uumui ASSESS oup S lull II'pll llpl uuuwu S luiiiuilllu" Iluuiiuw IIIII The duration of an aircraft noise event is defined as the number of seconds between the first and last values of the instantaneous noise level which are a minimum of 10 dBA below the maximum aircraft noise level(Lmax)• The Sound Exposure Level (SEL)describes with a single number the sound energy during an aircraft noise event. SEL takes into account both the duration and the magnitude of the aircraft noise event.The duration correction increases the magnitude in an attempt to account for the increased noisiness of sounds of long duration versus sounds of short duration. Because the duration of aircraft noise events are greater than one second, the numerical value of the SEL for an aircraft noise event is always greater than the numerical value of the maximum level,Lmax• For Example: Lmax=90.2 dBA Duration=8.8 seconds SEL=95.7 dBA ^90 _ �L Maximum A319 Aircraft Noise Level co Heard at Observer's Location=90.2 dBA :85 > 10 dBA below the Maximum 80 i" Aircraft Noise Level=80.2 dBA v N_ o 75 z 70 65 ru c 60 55 Duration of Noise Signal=8.8 seconds m Time NOISE LEVEL HEARD AT OBSERVER'S LOCATION—A319 LANDING ON RUNWAY 09 OBSERVER'S LOCATION—4TH ST BETWEEN FLAGLER AV AND JUANITA LN 4 Page D-32 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION uuuuow Vpm puwilw ill uum uuuoou IIIIII III IIIIII Iwm Ipmiwu uuuoloi uuooi ITS uuul� uuuw m IIIIII wu ioo 'IIIIIIwmwVlllll' ,IIIIII D ASS �III�Illlui" I�TolwwW uol�u.Vwwuup��i,. Illlllluuuuu IIIIII � �� uuuuuu uumu' [ �'' � uu �V ��IIIII uuuuuu uuuuuu i � � ououm uuuuuu ioouuu DNL NOISE EXPOSURE=LEVEL OF NOISE+NUMBER OF OPERATIONS AND TIME OF DAY DNL=SEL+10 x log[D+(10 x N)] 86,400 DNL= Day-Night Average Sound Level(in decibels) Represents an average 24-hour noise level, with a nighttime penalty to represent the added intrusiveness of noises at night.The DNL represents the long-term impact by averaging the periods of aircraft noise and no aircraft noise. SEL= Sound Exposure Level(in decibels)for one aircraft flight D= Number of daytime flights(between 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m.) N= Number of nighttime flights(between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.) Each nighttime flight is counted ten times(10 x N)to account for the added intrusiveness of noise occurring during nighttime hours(between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.). 86,400=Number of seconds in one day(24 hours x 60 minutes/hour x 60 seconds/minute = 86,400 seconds) Dividing the number of flights by 86,400 seconds per day,averages the periods of aircraft noise and no aircraft noise. 5 uuuuuwuw I u uwi I uuuuuuol9 III�IIm II � i uul ww I w iii� a uuulllll �ii w I w I w Iluww I i Iluuww I III i w Illlllllliluw dlll�I' I,III'°� ' IIIIII �IIIIIIIIIII � �� III Ike R� I T 1 w IIIIIL; IIIII T IIIII IIIII III� Il w T STEP E '.I'—IIOW OFTEN DID YOU HEAR ITS, rii rr / 0 1 / /r// / ✓ iriiiii rii rrrica,i ri r j%r r„ i a e aJfl, Cal� ; I DA10'(44'I Gi iTAVE RAGE SO I IIIII D II EVE I SAMPLE CALCLILATIWlil 6 Page D-33 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION mo Illuumulll uu uuuuu �I umuu uumuul luuumul� uumuu uuuuuu� AINII uuuuml �ImuoumVlll" Ilou�uuuuum Illuuuuuu STEP 1:WHAT DID YOU HEAR? IIIIIII. u III IIL. 1 wr I�i m � b J � f U f _ I t ,. 1 r r I o w Apr I {a I I I I J J I 1 I 1 1 Maximum A319 Noise I !�I Level Heard at Observer's Location=80.5 dBA � YlUlpu Fl„ Is ifi der Background Noise Level Approximately 45 dBA at Observer's Location a� uull 9'„ ,II� e I�IIIIII s w� uul IIII I e� II I II I u I IIII II I �IIIII 7 luum� II Illllllll vuu IIIII °� IIIIIII 1IIIIIIIIIIII 0 E E S �l E IT I mASSESS S E S 7S oiu � T „Illlll STEP 3:HOW LONG DID IT LAST? The duration of an aircraft noise event is defined as the number of seconds between the first and last values of the instantaneous noise level which are a minimum of 10 dBA below the maximum aircraft noise level(Lmax)• The Sound Exposure Level (SEL)describes with a single number the sound energy during an aircraft noise event. SEL takes into account both the duration and the magnitude of the aircraft noise event.The duration correction increases the magnitude in an attempt to account for the increased noisiness of sounds of long duration versus sounds of short duration. Because the duration of aircraft noise events are greater than one second, the numerical value of the SEL for an aircraft noise event is always greater than the numerical value of the maximum level,Lmax• For Example: Lmax=80.5 dBA Duration=8.8 seconds SEL=89.4 dBA 85 Maximum A319 Aircraft Noise Level co80 Heard at Observer's Location=80.5 dBA 75 > 10 dBA below the Maximum v 70 ill Aircraft Noise Level=70.5 dBA N_ 0 Z 65 CO 60 55 L 50 Duration of Noise 45 I� Signal=8.8 seconds m Time NOISE LEVEL HEARD AT OBSERVER'S LOCATION—A319 LANDING ON RUNWAY 09 OBSERVER'S LOCATION—KEY WEST CEMETERY 8 Page D-34 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 2L2O2l DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION STEP 4.-HOW OFTEN DID YO�U HEAR IT? AINIOTI-iER DMASAGI i I AVERAGE SOLI Pill I'll,")1,EVEli,,,,,,,,SAMPI E Passenger and Cargo Aircraft Operating at KWIA KeyWest InternationalAirport American Airlines Airbus 319 American Eagle Embraer ERJ-175LR Taken with Nikon D90 on April 16,2015 Taken with Olympus OWE)E-M5 Mark II on January 16,2016 This image was originally posted to Flickr by airlines470 at This image was originally posted to Flickr by Venkat Mangucli at This file is licensed under the This file is licensed under the Creative Commorts Attribtftion-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. (,reative.(,ommons..Attributiort-Share.Alike.2.0..Generic license. 10 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 2, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Passenger Cargo Ai and rcraft �,�g ,u.............. Operating at KWIA KeyWest Intern.aflonalAirport r, I i 10 �)»y American Eagle Embraer ERJ-170-200LR Delta Airlines Boeing 737-700 Photographer: _r.n.�V.slef.h..m. Photographer:James Wain ...._......_..............._ Taken with:Canon E05 70D 1 Canon EF 100-400L on Feb 9,2018 Taken with Nikon 040 on July 13,2009 htt:ps((www,jebhotascom(phota/8867825 h.2.s://commons.wikimedia.ara/wiki/Fiilebell:.a 737.-700 N303.l,jpy Permission to use this photograph was granted by the photographer on 13-November-2020. This image,originally posted to Flickr at Copyright©2002-2020 JetPhotos All Rights Reserved. https:((www flir_kr car r(photosl10037058NQ8l3719244344! This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. 11 Passenger and Cargo Aircraft Operating at KWIA Key'West United Express Embraer EMB 170-100SE Delta Airlines Airbus 319 Photographer:C'oI_i_n B"ro"w"Pu Taken on July 23,2019 Photographer:bavid h.ktp://commons,wikimedia.o.r,wikilFile:N633RW-Embraer ERJ-7.705E-IJnFPed ExarP dPg ........................... Taken with:Canon E05 50D on April 26,2013 This image was originally posted to Flickr by Colin Brown Photography at hY1ps://commons.wikimedia.orglwikilFile:N36SNB Airbus A314 6Pl'4'a(89798086707 pg hops:((flickrcom/p11 s/145 2 3 24 42@NO2/48360103382 This file is licensed under the This file comes from the Aer?prlrtts.corn.collection and is copyrighted. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. This file is licensed under the.Crvative_Gammon..At.tribution-Share.A.like 3.0.Jnpnrted license. Attribution:a.¢eroprirl'V:s..com 12 Page D-36 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Passenger Cargo Ai and rcraft URg .............. Operating at KWIA KeyWest Intern.aflonalAirport I�II�y ,I 11» II » �11�11 I �rlti 1 II \ 1 � I l \ „ y a, i / Silver Airways Saab 340B Silver Airways ATR 72-212A (600) Photographer:A_irno ester.l...d Photographer: sh aB...__�...IRanggnrj� Taken with:Canon E05 70D 1 Canon EF 100-400L on Feb 9,2018 Taken on June 8,2020 h1.1.p,s:lhy w,jetphoto.s.com/photo/8870777 hops:{{www.ietph�tgs.cgml�hg:4.a!9 T75593_ Permission..to use-this_Vhoto ra h was granted by the phatagraphPr_on._13.November 2020. Image Copyright©Vishal Al Rangersammy Copyright©2002-2020 JetPhotos All Rights Reserved. 13 I Passenger and Cargo Aircraft Operating at KWIA Key'West 1 I I 1 1 1 1 . I II 1 � I .I .I I � 1 I �11 I iI �11 I iI 1 I I i 11 11I1�1 11 I\ ra, niFi III III ` II i1 tl„ y•I Y I I f 9 �f ( "N 1 N l 1„1 i I i I n�i i 1 / i i / � f II H t / I I / Silver Airways ATR 42-600 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Photographer: a"tt e,w C,,i Taken with:NIKON D5500 on June 20,2020 Express �/ Cessna Q y� Permission to use this photograph was granted by the photographer on 3-December-2020. Federal 1./�p rQ'ss l�Q'ss 1 la 2 0 V B Caravan 1 htY�rs!lwww.j�tphotos:com[pho:tGl9771 M2_ Photographer:A_D�as°q.._W"i"I_so_�a Image Copyright©Matthew Cal ise Taken with NIKON f3200 on March 2.,2016 hit pg This image was originally posted to Flickr by Hawkeye UK at h:Y.Yps://flickr.com/photos/65001151C?NO3/28248098292 This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. 14 Page D-37 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION ....... .....w......_ ..Lw.. �L M p r NoiseExposureMapsUpdate Air Carrier Arrivals on January 1, 2020 a; ' h� r N r ri eSt rd�h"ti lL' woMr^u voi��,r�rw,r. �� ri,m�Yl rf xd 6Ni✓�Pfd�'^7�''1�uwfl�r�f1WP�� r /✓ ,,,,,,A�, Data Source: FI ightRada r24 15 r Noise Exposure Maps Update 2019 FOR EA OCT 2019 s SEPT 2020 SCALE FACTOR Key, West InternationalAirport Air Carrier/Air Taxi 20,113 17,744 0.88 General Aviation 32,419 26,743 0.82 Military 520 442 0.85 TOTAL 53,052 44,929 0.85 fir p , u r r lr i I u. v��U I. r`;. ,� �`'Y,� r /.f r it 9«c�,✓r r,i ri rr��!� r II..,i➢iuuuyuy� -�,i,,y>!« rF19J11��i��//� NNNN� ��'rrr,,," r„ °x r fiin/ ,rill ji%�l 1 � r„- «« 16 Page D-38 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 21 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Rg .............. Public Participation KeyWest International Airport The airport operator must af ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 17 Page D-39 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4u V�I,I YVV�i�Ni�liiiN �m°II (mrl I. III � I YI9V KEY EST " 6 �N f� IIII IIII � � ` i a r The Flopida►Keys Only Da dy Newspaper,Est 1876 PC}Box 1 9W,Key West FL 33041 le is ikeysn,ews,corn MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS KEY WEST FL 33040 Account: 141789 Ticket: 379566 PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MONROENOTICE H IS HE raC T N IT in or voice impaired.-call""711". MAY CONCERN at at orl a this 1. at a meeting vAll be held of Day of Februa 2021. Before t undersigned authority personallyr a Ian Elf l Senior Director of Airports AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE Key West Interriational Airport 3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd. oath saysthat he or she is REGARDINGTHE 49 CFR TITLE 14 PART ISO 02119/21 C` 14 NOISE f y N it MonroeCounty will host a Public newspaper published in Key West,in MonroeI r1 ,that the attached Meetin + Tuesday, arch , 21 at 2:DO . copy f v i t, ire legal in t r 3. at the published In saidr in the issues of: HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1200 Truman Avenue Friday, "� Key West,Florida AND Affiant further says that the Key West Citizen is a newspaper published in Key via a virtual meeting connection a West,in saidr Ianty,Flofida and that the saidr I~ ; usfill2 fore been continuously published in said MonroeFlorida ;and s n entered r t t inst in i Persons i�n r�� in this issue�are invit- Key to attend.Persons wishing attend Monroe nparticipate ,� Florida,I rx r period 1 year preceding first publication`c�►r1 electronically f t f advertisement; t t r she has -r. -� � The public can also parw to v4 phone neither paid nor promised any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate, (audio only)by diali ( )51 5 commissionr refund for the se of securing this advertisementr - and,when reques ,enter the Web[- tonr, nar IDN 92-2 732 , The public is further a i at some oral of the members of the Monroe County.Commission, t Commission/ (Signature nt Counci members and/or their appoint- ed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon,Key Colony 8each, Affirme difore rne this 23r0 clayof February 2021 Loytuiv acid the villayc or Wativisada, representativesof the Tourist Develop- mentCouncil and their area DistrictAd- visory Committee member may attend I r == and i ss i mshat ay frgo their respective commis- Ilk sions,councils,or advisory a . Pursuant to Section 286.0105,Florida Public Printed hanne) (Notary Seal) Statutes,notice is t i s per- son decided to appeal any decision x� de Y the 8oard withany My commission it �� matter consl a such hearin or meetin he will need a record o the pro=inays,and that, for such pur- pose, he may need to ensure that a Personally Knownr Identification verbati record of the proceedings is de,which record includes thetesti- mony and evidence upon which the a p- Type of Identification r al is to be based. ADA Assistance: Any individual need- ing special accommodations at this meeting,dueo a i ili ,should co n- Notary Pubfic SUM d FWIft tact the County mi istra es Office, Misty D VVesch at 2 1,Monday through Fri- 2 day(excluding holidays),between the O=W2023 hours of a.m.an S:00 m.and no later than five(5)calendar claysprior to e scheduled meetinq;if you are hear- MONROECODE-25-379566-Ipdf1 2 21 :3 p Page D-40 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Your ad Ad shown is not actual print size i i I� r� � �i�' � ��D�� I i � NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT Key West Citizen-Florida Free Press-Paradise MAY CONCERN The Daily Reflector-The Daily Advance-The Rocky Mount Telegram that a meeting will be held of Bertie Ledger-Chowan Herald-Duplin Times-Farmville Enterprise-Perquimans Weekly Standard Laconic-Tarboro Weekly-Times Leader-Williamston Enterprise KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PO Box 1967 Greenville NC 27835-(252)329-9500 AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 49 CFR TITLE 14 PART 150 Date: February 16, 2021 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Monroe County will host a Public Meeting on - CLASSIFIED AD PROOF — Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 2:00 p.m. at the HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER Thank you for advertising with us! This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the 1200 Truman Avenue Upstairs in the Commission Chambers dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact Sue Stamper by phone Key West,Florida 33040 at or email at sstamper@keysnews.com. AND via a virtual meeting connection at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/i/92220947320 CUSTOMER INFORMATION Persons interested in this issue are invit- ed to attend.Persons wishing to attend Account#: 141789 electronically can participate at https:// Name: MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS mcbocc.zoom.us/j/92220947320. The Address: 3491 S ROOSEVELT BLVD public can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 KEY WEST FL 33040 and, when requested, enter the Webi- Telephone: (305)809-5239 nar ID#922-2094-7320. Email: leto-beth@monroecounty-fl.gov The public is further advised that some or all of the members of the Monroe County Commission, the Commission/ Council members and/or their appoint- ed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon, Key Colony Beach, AD INFORMATION Layton and the Village of Islamorada, representatives of the Tourist Develop- ment Council and their area District Ad- Ad ID: 379566 visory Committee member may attend Run Dates: 02/19/21 to 02/19/21 the meeting and discuss items that may come before their respective commis- Total Cost: $196.80 Account Rep: Sue Stamper sions,councils,or advisory boards. #of Inserts: 2 Phone#: (305)292-7777 Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida #of Lines: 82 Email: legals@keysnews.com Statutes, notice is given that if a per- Ad Class: 56 son decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such pur- Publications Start Date End Date #of Insertions pose, he may need to ensure that a Key West Citizen 02/19/21 02/19/21 1 verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. ADA Assistance: Any individual need- ing special accommodations at this meeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office, at(305)292-44411 Monday through Fri- day (excluding holidays), between the hours of 8:30 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.and no later than five(5)calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hear- ing or voice impaired,call"711". Dated at Key West, Florida this 19th Day of February,2021. Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd. Key West,FL 33040 02/19/21 Key West Citizen Page D-41 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm5 June 1, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-42 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, June i 5t,2021 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/i/96449960014 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 964 4996 0014. Roll Call Sign In A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. Marsh 2nd1 2021 B. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Aircraft Operations development 2. Flight Track Development 3. Public Participation C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. Building A - Phase 1 Construction Summary 2. Building A - Phase 2 Update 3. KWBTS - Final Phase Update D. FAA Grant Application for FY'21 E. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports F. Discussion / Nomination of an Ad-Hoc Committee Member to represent aviation. G. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "7I1". Page D-43 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June Ist, 2021 Meeting Minutes Meeting culled to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates Peter Horton Marlene Durazo Dr. Julia Ann Floyd (via telephone) Andrea Haynes Nick Pontocorvo Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML & A, Noise Program Coordinator Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager Michael Sullivan, Las Salinas Condominiums Homeowner Dr. William "Sandy" Quillen, Las Salinas Condominium Association Board Member (via Zoom) Rashon Lyons, Las Salinas Condominium Association Property Manager (via Zoom) Andrew bulcey, owner of multiple properties in Key West Roberta DiPiero, Homeowner (via Zoom) Jaime Caballero, Key West Residential Property Management (via Zoom) Bud Griner, Air Traffic Manager, Key West Tower A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the March 2"d, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Peter Horton made a motion to approve the minutes; Nick Pontocorvo seconded the motion. The minutes were approved as presented. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-44 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June Ist, 2021 Meeting Minutes Noise Exposure Maps Update 1. Aircraft Operations Development Deborah presented a series of slides illustrating a comparison of 80dB(A) LmQx single event noise footprints for various aircraft landing and taking off on Runway 09. The aircraft included 737-700 (AEDT substitution for A220), ATR-42 (substituted with DHC830in AEDT), EMB-175, EMB-170, A319, CNA208, A220, SF-340, and ATR-72. Someone asked if the new noise contours would look like these. Deborah explained that this information is in the AEDT noise model and is used in the calculation of the [)NL noise contours, but these contours are not UNL. The substitution of the 737-700 for the A220 in AEDT will be beneficial (i.e., will produce a larger DNL contour) in the f uture condition when there will be many A220 operations. Deborah presented a slide showing aircraft operations reported by the FAA f rom the Air Traffic Activity System (ATAbS) for October 1 through December 31, 2020. She then presented a series of slides summarizing data f or the same period that were obtained from FlightRadar24. The analysis of the FlightRadar24 data included the number of operations by aircraft category, runway, day/night operations, departure/arrival/touch & go operations, and stage length f or departure operations. A handout was provided to everyone including this information and additional similar information. She pointed out the Runway Utilization for this period was skewed very heavily to Runway 9, between 96 and 98 percent, depending on aircraft category. She explained that for previous NEMs, a Runway Utilization of 80% to 85% had been used for Runway 9. This information only represents three months and does not represent the average annual day. She explained that 12 months of data f rom FlightRadar24 would be used to develop the average annual day input for AEDT, which would generate the noise contours f or the existing condition. The airport has proposed using FY'21 operations (Oct 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) to represent the existing condition. The FAA suggested using the most recent 12 months, but because of the impacts of the pandemic on aircraft operations the airport felt that did not represent normal operations. The airport has proposed using the FAA's Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) f or developing the future condition noise contours. Deborah presented a slide showing the APO Terminal Area Forecast Summary Report Issued in May 2021. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-45 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 1 St, 2021 Meeting Minutes It included a forecast of operations for 2020 through 2030. We would probably use forecast operations for 2027 for the future condition. The airport is awaiting the FAA's approval to use FY'21 operations for the existing condition and the TAF for the future condition. Deborah presented a slide regarding the use of "Standing Take-offs." She indicated she had contacted each airline (Delta, American, and United) inquiring about their use of this procedure at EYW. She presented the response received from Delta, which is the only response she has received so far. Andrea Haynes said this is called a "Static Takeoff." Bud Griner responded that particularly A319s lock their brakes, spool up, and then release their brakes to take off. This was modeled in the previous NEMs. Regarding the use of the full runway length for departures on Runway 09, Bud Griner stated that the some of EMB170s and EMB175s and all Silver are asking to back-taxi to use the extra 271 feet more and more frequently. Peter Horton asked if the extra runway can be used for landing, or just take off. 2. Flight Track Development Deborah presented a series of slides illustrating flight tracks of operations on Runway 09 from the same FlightRadar24 data. The tracks were shown by aircraft category and included AC-AT Jets, AC-AT Props, 6A Props, and GA Jets. The slides illustrated, and Deborah explained, the process of developing AEDT flight tracks from the FlightRadar24 flight tracks. Sample AEDT flight tracks and an example noise contour from the Environmental Assessment were superimposed over the FlightRadar24 flight tracks to illustrate the area where the flight tracks would influence the noise contours. Deborah explained that it is important to accurately model the flight tracks in this area to make the contours as accurate as possible. The next step is to determine the flight track utilization, i.e., what percentage of operations use each track. Bud Griner asked if the modeled tracks were developed visually or otherwise. Deborah explained that it was a combination of both, the tracks can be drawn by hand and digitized, or they can be developed in 6I5. Peter Horton asked about the source of the flight tracks. Deborah explained these tracks came from FlightRadar24 collected using an ADSB receiver located on the airport. Peter asked about data from the Navy (like we requested in the past), and Deborah explained that it was very difficult to obtain any data from the Navy, and once we f finally did, it was unusable. Deborah indicated that she would use all 12 months of data to make the final determination on the flight tracks and utilization. This Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-46 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 1st, 2021 Meeting Minutes presentation was made to explain the process, and the tracks are subject to change. Marlene burazo asked if this could be compared to the same period in 2019. Deborah indicated she did not have data for 2019. 3. Public Participation Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized that input from the committee and the public is very important to this process. A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1 Construction Update 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2 Update 3. KWBTS Final Phase - Update A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Two calls about NIP participation • Five calls regarding noisy aircraft • Six calls about aircraft flying over La Brisa. 2. Airport Noise Report The following articles were mentioned: • Sound Insulation, NextGen (Vol. 33, No. 7) • FAA Annoyance Survey, House Quiet Skies Caucus (Vol. 33, No. 8) • Annoyance Survey (Vol. 33, No. 9) • National Sleep Study (Vol. 33, 10) Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-47 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 1st, 2021 Meeting Minutes • Special Report (Vol. 33, No. 11) • Annoyance Survey (Vol. 33, No. 12) • FAA Noise Policy (Vol. 33, No. 13) • Noise Policy (Vol. 33, No. 14) • NES (Vol. 33, No. 15) • Aircraft Noise Policy (Vol. 33, No. 16) • House Quiet Skies Caucus, Noise Policy Review (Vol. 33, No. 17) Discussion/Nomination of New Member Peter Horton suggested James Seadler, American Airlines Properties Representative. However, Peter did not receive Mr. Seadler's bio prior to today's meeting, so the committee did not feel comfortable nominating him. This item is tabled until the next meeting. Other Discussion Peter Horton asked about the timing for the new noise contours. Deborah stated she hoped they would be completed by June 2022 and the FAA will not fund any additional NIP, beyond KWBTS, until the new Noise Exposure Maps are completed. He also asked if the FAA would move beyond the UNL 65 dB contour at some point. Deborah said maybe someday, but unlikely any time soon. Andrew bulcey asked about the altitude of air carrier jet arrivals over Old Town. He was concerned that a couple "outliers" a day flew 10 to 20 feet lower than most others. Deborah indicated she would plot the altitude profiles for AC Jet arrivals on Runway 9 from the FlightRadar24 data. Bud Griner explained that the 6P5 approach to Runway 9 indicates the altitude at BUSBY, which is 4.5 nautical miles from the runway threshold, is 1500 feet. However, aircraft flying a visual approach may not be precisely on that path. They all f ly a gradual descent, not a step down. Ultimately all pilots want to hit the touch down zone, which is about 1000 feet down the runway. Bud Griner went on to explain the interaction between EYW and NAS KW. He stated that a restriction is placed on aircraft departing on Runway 09 (and Runway 27 if applicable) regarding their climb profile. The 2000 ft restriction on the initial altitude for instrument departures was instituted by the previous Navy ATC Officer NAS Key West. That is the altitude that the Navy departure controller protects along the route of flight that the airplane will follow. He must separate all his (Navy) air traffic from the route and altitude of the Key West departure as it quickly gets into Navy airspace immediately after taking off from Key West Runway 9. It is the Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-48 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 1st, 2021 Meeting Minutes same for Key West airplanes departing off runway 27. Once he sees that departure on his radar and radar identifies it and gets in radio contact with the departure, he will issue further climb instructions based on the traffic at that point. We will be trying to convince the Navy to change that maximum initial altitude to a higher value soon. They are authorized to give us a higher initial altitude upon request if they have no conflicting traffic. Deborah mentioned that this might impact the noise contours, and she will investigate it further. Custom profiles may need to be created to account for the altitude restriction. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:00 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 June 1,2021 Page D-49 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION International i Meetingof th Ad Hoc Comml*ttee on Noise Tuesday, Ist, 1 Noise ExposureMaps d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max 51*ngle Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 Y s y II 737-700 (Substitution for A220) 2 Page D-50 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 11 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 J � r I r a 7� ATR-42 (Substituted with DHC830) 3 Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 r i F i �o Pl l M EMB-175 4 Page D-51 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 dB A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 pp a 11 r ✓.r� i �,,,6� ,. V l 1 EMB-170 5 Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 dB A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 M1M1 V A319 6 Page D-52 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 CNA208 Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 �u , 6 v f f A220 8 Page D-53 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 11 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 7� u , rP SF-340 9 Noise Exposure Maps Update d Comparison of 80 d6 A L max Single Event Noise Footprints Landingand Takeoff on Runway09 J d ^ 4 1 �l �u i ATR-72 10 Page D-54 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 11 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION frp,a Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... International Airport KeyWest Aircraft Operations Reported by the FAA October 1—December 311 2021 ATADS : Airport Operations : Standard Report From 10/2020 To 12/2020 1 Facility=EYW Itinerant Local Date Air Carrier Air Taxi General Aviation Military Total Civil Military Total Total Operations Oct-20 1,035 395 2,138 21 3,589 180 5 185 3,774 Nov-20 1,218 466 1,960 17 3,661 95 4 99 3,760 Dec-20 1,596 517 2,734 31 4,878 202 11 213 5,091 Total: 3,849 1,378 6,832 69 12,128 477 20 497 12,625 Report created on Sun May 23 12:13:26 EDT 2021 Sources:Air Traffic Activity System(ATADS) i Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Aircraft Operations on Runway 09 KeyWest Reported by FlightRadar24 I rnaLi nal.Air October 1—December 31,2021 09 DAY DEP 1 207 a 560 875 3021 0 1,944 09 NIGHT DEP 1 1 1 6 1 0 9 09 DAY DEP 2 906 27 71 195 0 1,199 09 NIGHT DEP 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 09 DAY DEP 3 224 1 2 97 1 325 ...........................................................................................I........ ........................................................,....................... 09 NIGHT DEP 3 0 0 0 2 0 2 09 DAY DEP 4 0 0 0 17 0 17 09 NIGHT DEP 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 09 DAY DEP 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 .............. "I'll".......... ............................... ................ 09 NIGHT DEP 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 DAY DEP 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 NIGHT DEP 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 i ,, f moo/ moo/ moo/ �o ,, moo/ 09 DAY ARR NA 1,29 5 626 1,139 751 1 3,812 09 NIGHT ARR NA 52 2 5 1 0 60 09 DAY T&G NA 12 4 115 6 0 137 09 NIGHT T&G NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... a �1g c� 1 ,us:iii, RUNWAY 09 TOTALS 2,699 1,221 2,213 1,372 2 7,507 12 Page D-55 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 11 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION frp,a Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... Aircraft Operations on Runway 27 KeyWest Reported by FlightRadar24 Internationat.AirportOctober 1—December 31,2021 ou, All a!1 a aka a�i ��i 1 �Ni i i��ui ii�iu i i�I II Iwl�l I �lpl II 1 ou +ul m liil I�I I l p1ui iu i i i III m W II i miu i iimimiVllVii i�i Iwl Niiu i i ui iiui i u� � 27 DAY DEP 1 15 44 51 10 0 120 27 NIGHT DEP 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 DAY DEP 2 59 1 3 15 0 78 27 NIGHT DEP 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 DAY DEP 3 14 0 1 7 0 22 27 NIGHT DEP 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 DAY DEP 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 27 NIGHT DEP 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 DAY DEP 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 NIGHT DEP 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 DAY DEP 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 NIGHT DEP 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....................................................... '/........... „... 27 DAY ARR NA 125 44 67 48 0 284 27 NIGHT ARR NA 4 0 2 0 0 6 06 31 27 DAY T&G NA 7 0 7 1 0 15 27 NIGHT T&G NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 6 IN 1 RUNWAY 27 TOTALS 224 89 131 82 0 526 13 Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Runway Utilization KeyWest Reported by FlightRadar24 InternaLionat.AirportOctober 1—December 31,2021 RUNWAY 09 DAY PERCENTAGE OF ARRIVALS 91% 93% 94% 94% 100% 93% PERCENTAGE OF DEPARTURES 94% 93% 95% 95% 100% 94% RW 09 DAY TOTALS 2,644 1,225 2,305 1,410 2 7,586 RW 09 DAY PERCENTAGES 92% 93% 94% 94% 100% 93% NIGHT PERCENTAGE OF ARRIVALS 93% 100% 71% 100% #DIV/0! 91% PERCENTAGE OF DEPARTURES 100% 1000/0 100% 100% #DIV/0! 100% RW 09 N IGHT PERCENTAGES 93% 100% 85% 100% #DIV/0! 92% RUNWAY 09 PERCENTAGES 97% 96% 97% 98% 100% 97% RUNWAY 27 DAY PERCENTAGE OF ARRIVALS 9% 7% 6% 6% 00/0 7% PERCENTAGE OF DEPARTURES 6% 7% 5% 5% 00/0 6% RW 27 DAY PERCENTAGES 8% 7% 6% 6% 00/0 7% NIGHT 01 PERCENTAGE OF ARRIVALS 7% 0% 29% 0% #DIV/0! 9% RW 27 N IGHT PERCENTAGES 7% 0% 15% 0% #DIV/0! 8% RUNWAY 27 PERCENTAGES 3% 4% 3% 2% 0% 3% 14 Page D-56 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 15 Data Source: 1 y FlightRadar24 6 , AC-AT Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 ;r October-December 2020 r f , t i i J y e;r ;I f J, o I+� 0 i �wlr 16 Page D-57 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 Tracks � Flight With Modeled I� 1% P^ i i d� i I f" 17 Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks y &2024 Contour from EA r 1 / i i I w 18 Page D-58 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October December 2020 i I p //%d`Grrr rrr'�/�/%✓r��aaW,��iJ�i://////��/i �r' Ir ' ',�„ � ��l�`7�1J l�i�%fit n"�1��%/�/r/�(/��il..��/��/ fr�°,:�� r!urn;,��,u�i!✓�.... V ,,,,, r s, ,! �% r< r lrYl��I/'%/ /�, Adr /�%%��'%°",y`Mr / ✓,�� r,, r f f'ri r I r li X �. 1 J�p I /J r�uwi�w�r�y°�!, rlr y vm� ➢P r ,�; � �� f' �r �Jr %//�/ ,� ,,, !i '`",l"., ,-Ila�, P� '"', I,,.;,�,� I �,N I r�I i✓Nir,� �i � ��' "„�. ! ,, a I�f��bG✓4r�,,,,,.,1/ (r,'v' ,,., r., !/l,' yi;.,'1�,, �'�,,;'�,l��'r� ,.�.,/ ,,,; Y�r1�)Yn�! r r r�Jr,/d v„�i,/"� �. x i r r r r%✓' J ( +�Jf �� r »v ofL ///f / ;,ram r, I ,,.:f„ll'" i"!; ,; �!, ail/I,r „do;�;°Yr��,`�'"rr,//,✓rr.:t r yr%��ri,��r/"�..��r,il/ f I r�b`�{I1.� � �,'� ?br e r�ilh��ql,�'I(,, Y!;"i % /-��, i,„ ;�✓�i✓�!r(��I(`ric/�!'�, �/� !'ro/ �,�///°riii/l� r � y, lls il. VJJ � I i ;� arr�F 0 !✓io�, e � �f I r.." I"u�. �/,/ r� ➢ /.. , �/i r ii / i ,;...//'�";' a%.,�f µ!,, ^�r�u�awY.f�✓�G >✓ ,`'Mrm��ry' /l % v� /f(✓rJ��w �✓b�'�w;',�q''"%^�'i'i�,�„ ' ', ��!J ,.,.�y r�ii�i!`r' �rl,,,rfa,�^�" ,^ ,,�, "r,, /Y o, J.,, ✓�/�rar;/l r%�u/,�f�� „lY,, �`U(P, �, r Rob � '% i� l�o,,�� '.'1XJ' 5 r f a, ✓1 ��,I�Xr !a✓✓� !y/"!if I� ,D r �,��/';V !^�,.. r 7 ".. I(� I yl ��.:. ," ,,I�..�� I.'„ I,l > �j„✓�JI rr.r r J�s,,,,"i!, !/r.;/�lr�F„,li.:��lr�:llf"� Ifr (i �� 0 ,%� /,�,v,,�r �/J✓,, I!�Jl ya err �iY�� /x,�,e//r,�/�G��,r�i7!'� `.�%�'�;wD "�rf�1 ..�! l � 'r�,,...�+i nNa k�/I„ AR�� WI"' r °.:.r.,fioo„r,,,< %r'�✓ r�rF'i�r �' „i r ✓!/ � ,N" r <, I rGWO,r <,�`,,,✓�!°J/�l yJ((r Irfil rw,NW.`4/'`h�iiN/� ,,�` .,,�.., ';",;., �'�'` ,�� r////I r/, I I"r...„ l,!ury is,r,,��iYJ J" I//,�'!x� (i" l�„/r I ✓f!��f /r„%� ��^r , ,.I ,r,, �r i I�r�,,a,,�,��/r p//�//�'J�o��17��'�jri//J�rr/J'f rJ�r//; ✓✓ °i r r ,�G ,i;"! I� c '" i i�r 1e� �,G✓u/I rr { H �/ 1 r1 /rr I /'�`'` ,r, 'I �,; f,� 1 2✓ �al i ^,„,�,�,, ✓„ � � /'J ��'�+�II II�%l i/f r r��,�4 I r � 1 r 1 7/ 1 I �„�i s � �✓�/I/ � 'c 19 Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 �I I I � ia��J�✓fir%% J�N��mfi�� rr !,(I /. �r`�,I II ��, ;,ii%�,�(��/fir �I i,�I i i u ��✓r;;�ri'+ /i l✓ll1r� fr' 1� o a, r 11y!// r,,I r� �,,, � r 1 / ✓ ,r of / r�,IwJ�m.,,," r I � ,�d.� /r' ,,. e/ l �fJ./� ./�l �ol I„ ..YV ..e�....p l;� ,..«� ,,,.� ...r/✓,'„I,.. ,., VY,,,,, �,,., ,� A tit i v t �✓ � �, l r," �, y.ra ^l� /1,,, !✓,✓ r. I�r,�,,,ir �, �ZI✓�r r � i„ r/:✓� ��//��!/�/r/(/ � �° ,„ r�r�J I,��J,,r �../�" r. r<.�,.,,ri✓9, �G, c(.!-a ,,,J f�.„1 I.,,l�,.J �/,,,��//� ,� » r.. ., �.. ,lrrl ry, r Ji,>,//r,,/rlY�✓ Y4 t, rrrl �, ,- r��i ii/,✓ ,.,/.��/,rid „�/., �,,, rr „ � i�� ,r�,J/�i/,. !�/� /, �r,, � /, IP, rll,: I r�Ji„ �il�,.lr�,,,/� rl ✓ / I,, Y; �,r";r,y;�,, �a,� r,s r„�� f% � ,/�� r/,�y�J; � I i z:,! r,,,,^l ,/OY J{�.1� ,I ✓ ��i/ „�� y,,^'/;�/ �'�llJriii,"�Gir �,/,/�o,l'!l f(/1,. ,- 1116+ %� � � ,�r „,.I�, ,. ✓,,,,.,,.,,/�, „�1 N; /�,�✓ci/��,U r��, ��V%, „/�,/,,D,i//add,!r,il!�;, ,, v�/r�l ,IJ,f 9%i�' ;f" /h9� J�",,V41°� � Ilr�/r," ,roa v9 ,�,, �(a'✓,;/�/W�6��,,,�//! �,,,,;rde� r r'�% �err ro � la: ✓rr f �G�.i�i//J,�f,, �1,1 y/ ,/'��r /I I �iii% /,f ��rri,�/I"t"� r��,�„ 1� 6gf � r�l/%m"��,,;�r „�✓,// D, �, ��qr �m"��4@� ,� li� /' 1 / /^,. / ;;r✓ � W4".",/�/�r//�`/ r r),, ! ��I,,rr�1�11yfi„� �;rr //�✓,� /�.. ,f, r�'" ``-r )%� ��rl�l�� ,,,�I r�,��l��j�, '�i��, ..�/I Jr ,�,��;Jar��i/r�%'%� li, �/r>;�Fd r IG ✓ a'� / 'f a," fair e r i y1 'J'�9 �� j�� IJ / If ! F ; ^ f ! r p I, !✓ I r 1 I r �N�� 1 r 1 i i I 20 Page D-59 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 f ! r II , AC-AT Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 , October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks , a � ✓ojli 11f r' r/�H/�'.I,�1 V<i 1 /r/-,I f��.'Wf ,il.,r��r r I j' r�/y>,rrr/'�'Wr." %i�,:� ��J,s� r� �r ��0,�✓/ , f!r¢ar ✓ r F ,. nL, .r ' f%°, i� �' r %��i,.r� �1,'�5flrl✓ l ,I� 01 nv.. l r�a t// f..r,, ,✓, nit,9�r�'J ii,,,�/ ,.. �r,„.:///,r �//i r/rl✓, '',a.. p,; !1, t' ,f r,c u�Yl„r, /lJ'" ✓„r,, /�, r///,,r r,. l�.,,,r/�G9 r,./, /f,r:>l1,r:,��%/',;,.,."/r✓;/j.�%ii r//,y/,lr�u,,"mlY/ll�i//i//�////ia rrr%//,rav„ rt„ ,.G,,, „/ / ,/, 9r o r M, r F� / / i � r ✓ r 16u!((4y rry / r(" 5„ a s r�. �..y. r,.. ��„✓ f^'�' k..%/o/�,��r,Yf�i. ,.��f �r ,,,� ...r r f� v/ ,...,,� /i. l� ��/, /o, r ., �rz/yl;�i Vf /� r��/; �„> /,�c 2 /,r.,� ✓i t�, 7w6✓/„ � J ,ll nr", �:ir J ,,)r,, ��r,. �i �.a'n "/., ir, /1 / ,, �P �,.VUr /o/L� ,i�/. ,,1 ,//,✓/`,/1�rV`fr�/i f(�(((?�, r.,.�rl�/rnr /'r/�«;nr //„/i..JY�� s � r r�,.,�/r,..r��J, r�,�i,�.. ��,�✓�/l, r i t /l'�,r;;�i' i�r;�, ii%>i JI��J)� �r, �, 1 �r ��Q I 1 II J vif Jrr� aip, r%,r �, ,, r,,,,, /r �./� r,, f r:,J t r/r,.,.,��,�,rr�,�� /��;;; ;," f/i„r' �, I, rl ��,✓ , a�,w✓r c� rr'ud % � ,fir,p, � �(/,6 � / �� ' � � r,,,,,, r,w,,,, �riv/�¢,,. J, ,n ,.,d,,,,lo'�'�, 1',�j(��CIA r�a,�I l��r U�/f✓' ,l,Jr fr%��i�A��'� ly, Id uo l// /%��ly�)t➢ /..iJgr„r�of %" r6��„,/ ,,, i�J J! ✓. r' is ��4/ � „ �%!J/G,F u!I'sy,r /�'F'Y3.��'"r',� v y N iA rrr/�i� ' !, Fr✓�1 „'r, ,,r�l � d:' ''" , // r„ // ,�' r'� 'I�y ,�r/ �r%J�U��d,/�1� P n^, ' ,!I ,,,'�., r, m�";fo,ll,.n�>lr Vr„F/60,I J r,r::r;�rr��r1%,,',/ l(l %. a��'n!••.'1�//r�f r (lr I' 1 ?r �,,Jf� "/� ,% r r/e ,+✓ ��.I J /��Ii�r r��r J�j' �_.. t ,➢ r f � I r «9 1/,/ r� ,� d o i i k �rrra r I� /i ✓ yr .IVY � ,' �/rJ/ ' �,",� I 'f � r i,r i f o � r J N r x T Q i } f r 21 Data Source: ; r FlightRadar24 AC-AT Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks Jl &2024 Contour from EA r r .. , ; �/" %) �✓ r ,, liYl llf� N ;,; uu f ir(,,, frN 11 r,�r r%�� I � J��"��rwr ". f ✓�V 17�(irr �R f i J I,� /rF/'�ar� !',r) yJn' to N� r 1 r I / J4r j�'Il r��Y ✓f � / ,� r�jy / ry �� T Jb/� ✓b �r'1 �1� ��rG r� r, � " ",�ry f rf I' �i�, J; /✓1 ;(r,//�4dv` °,..r,�i/i,,� � �'%0 p/rf�` �,'.°.Ir/rf� / �riq� i i ,�� ,.� r. � �,, ✓i ,r.,�„r, �„ �r'�s�`1(S"F7„ j,, �.r�ri,c rl:,J ,..,�r / / ./ w�, ,. ', ,,, � r. � ,, �> ,�., r d,�"�dbw„ r, t r mm 1K , c , �G/�// ,.. rr lN;'+rl�.:./r ,J 1„„,1. r %��,�.�,✓ / F' ,i w/ / /i r r �i wbr,. ,/,//,.g7Rrr v r ,,,,.. / o/, D�l. r" � //� ✓�/r' f. f� ,,�I/( �!o :,A� l �', � /�aA/�/, �r ✓, ,r„.v, ,/��r'� 9 „r � � /i Fi� r.J°,,,J�i,(�/.. o,/r,i��ii�!5�ic�'Y//r r, r i,/ ��/V r'7r r� r'�J Y;///�" I�u, "�l��bn,v,: i/%"r,1,�� ,FF-I '�,,r�,i "�✓,l(,��/�^�,�;f!��, .� ,. , r?f//lii�,' r rr° �'' rt✓d,r�J �"!, �i�/,// �r,:%', ri "ra r"' ��u�'(%'�/"��r��r � r 1 r r'o'9 r r' I �' `� f/ J/,y�rvryf" ��I'�, / ✓r. � l if'/ IP � �'Ir l r, i r ra r r / r I � � o. I I r I I r r I r » I ' I r � 22 Page D-60 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 GA Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 23 Data Source: FlightRadar24 i GA Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 F 8 I 1 i 24 Page D-61 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 1 GA Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks r u , 25 Data Source: FlightRadar24 GA Prop Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks &2024 Contour from EA i i rri u � ' ' s i 0 u` 26 Page D-62 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 GA Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 F �4owlf ;rnAr October-December2020 V � B u 111 a u Yuu � � 1 p u Im1u Ar wM W a / Ilr�` II� yY� "�9�y� �eII YI N+ww ! r � "°' ,, �•- y��.i 1 V fl d P a .r, pd �' ' ^1� - I.,: �r r�r'„ '"�'wiL � ' w ��u'Y�13P�':�� ✓ ,�i I mp m .tea mini�101 2/ Data Source: FlightRadar24 y' L f GA Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 u�' awe r; Vi� J Dui iUc, u w r a a 4 a, I, p. II a+" � I 28 Page D-63 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: A ` FlightRadar24 GA Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks U � y „ � i/rii//ia�y o ICI ✓ ,J� Pi f !k � M ib��xF w, D � �' „✓,, ,6),y U�`�/� %, rd�i �,Y n,I � ��"„f�ar/� din.. u!� , ✓ v;, �, 'Af/ r/ ,n l , off � r �u� � ,�� '�v ��V�iJ^ �,, ""' �r i��`� y�d �dl �l ✓;� �i V� /� r � 1 � �✓f�v C F�f,)y'�1 - w�iiy�� r u, �+ m „r I+ YYh� � NLI✓� � r ,'�..,;^":�"',�i�ol! ;,,��:, �,� � r'-, i��`!,✓,'�I� �, �I �,,IIf��Nli�,,�„ ,i,�;,mi �,c;,,�., ,,�VI� ��,7 fi/ fyV ,,P'� �w r; ' i��ti�ll. AA �i� ��lO�i�' idu✓,i.,�,,,u'"�, "V� ,�,�,,,,' 2�`�, �'od4 raw '` Jfi a e�o�'�r�i �7�IM,��yi�q ,�,.�h ;`;��, ,,tl r'�iYy�^�',ri 4,, ,.,1 v",,,��.,,,,,�' ,,, ii�d in,, �,,.� ""Wp�W�"pia�i a � Y�Fu,rF��✓�,? �n�°� �'n,{ �� , ' err r Ord � Jr N`"' m�� A � � ,�,� �✓ �q J � �� I�,a nN � �,• �� h1,� J ' Jl�;�i, ll�,n i 29 Data Source: FlightRadar24 r o 11 GA Jet Arrivals on Runway 09 October-December 2020 � �,,� �� , .� � With Modeled Flight Tracks �, 24& 0 Contour from EA �,a 2 p,Ny h� "�( ,osy�, ...,i� �,c,if��%�:r�� ,f I '�:�� +. ,-f11„„ �j i � �+fi✓J.+�� r n,^,,. �r I/"r�✓r�iv i�i��„r+10,;I I I 4, ,„� r � �� w ,,� �a �m,Y`, � r E ✓ i ,:, I�i�l° J„'lrr /� Y,�( " r � rwn r� ,uYJrrrv✓✓' -m� wrl� � 1+� ............. ,1,0,'xmmwmM... ,,;,—._. >� ;,«�-�,w�:�i wd�d�N�" rirar�`��7�i i1 .pn, °`✓�,D�i''IdiW��i�,� p�iiu"'"r,U'� �%ar/F'„�� " ;�umm ow w�il��'��,�w�.`"", ,,,� , :�1!�(la i a��,,Y:��",�u'� F� l•'��d,�^,�� '✓,' li i°'�' Af: �!�", %i �ice" E✓,, �»wAaf✓i� �� 76, r�„ i � �,,i ,U�� (r Y',,` i,v�` �i% ✓ �f�;, ��UI��f�"�!J�:«+n"u"' ,�„�ww�; ni"`� ✓.avl�' ��1''mmIIJ! rJ�� a ii"�� 0�, i�i"�,A��" nr� %'°� 'd,�f� � l'!4' ""um"� i� ✓I ��r�21v r I� °+�f ✓� l ��I�'^juw'° iw,•,�tl �iI v a � , lid°� f IPA. p/ a� �✓� f��, � iM �. i �i f r lwiq% �� 1�j � � u�� ✓1J n i r � ! I c I, i i n r t a ✓ �w, 7 30 Page D-64 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 C-AT Jet Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 31 Data Source: FlightRadar24 C-AT Jet Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks 32 Page D-65 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION r r / r , y,/ r Data Source. / r, Fli htRadar24 / / /r / n / / r v r r�� / � �/„✓r r W, l r r I u + w; V li I 9 V i VV r „p/ ,,. r� II.,.. rr�'l/..11,//,../..1../ ,... ,..f. ,�� .i.✓,/,.�p�.,cq,r. 1 ,. ,..J ✓,, �,�iv I jr///,,,, / // �..<,,�,/�1.�i��,� .,„, �. 1 �- r ,,- �1,, d„ N.. .�,5.. ,. 1. ,..rr,/// / /../ ,..✓ �.r� , ,,/ ,,.. (.r/, � r .... .r,�.i ,,, � .,.l .... .. ... ,.e✓� ..., �/�.i ,,.I �1 .,... ... gab..,,,i l ..., r r !�,a;,i.,� it i/,,, ,,/�;'%/ia// ,,,.,,r/Ji//r%%%0/��r G�o�r✓.��» �� r y,r�� V. r/i/! IrWk✓�/ //i i%1 '�/r r)r` r"ff � I'�Ir AC-AT Jet Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks &2024 Contour from EA 33 Data Source: FlightRadar24 / I � I, - f u, n I s � I ! u r , r r JI' Y i o, I"r I r, AC-AT Prop Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 34 Page D-66 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: FlightRadar24 AC-AT Prop Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks 35 Data Source: Flig AC-AT Prop Departures on Runway 09 October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks 36 Page D-67 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT June 11 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Data Source: � r / Fli htRadar24 r �r I�,r / r` 0 i /✓ /,,,� / �,:/fir/,/ �f,r;�r uuuuuuuuuuuuuu r VI II flVl m + »ry „�/' 1, � /ir 1` J/ ✓////-r�,� r i IIIII I wl ao,i � // � � , i r 1, / //�✓,T+, r r,f� I r, `I,„� r a ,I i 1 N N� Y Y 11 G pp IVI r awl� Ili, �luuif� rl I,- I I �i511V1' N it, III i i i 11 �I eInc ,,wi I ,/,, ,�.,. /,//�✓f �, r. / ,/ // �, r /� rr, u. , �,,, �r%/,,,,.✓r �,��..rr.//,, /i/rr, a. AC-AT Prop Departures on Runway 09 r r ' October-December 2020 With Modeled Flight Tracks &2024 Contour from EA 37 Noise Exposure Maps Update Keywest APO Terminal Area Forecast Summary Report t �rt� 1 Apt Forecast Issued May 2021 I � IIIIIIII� IIIII1611111111 II II'lllllll,,I�I �Ill�il II ill ull II u � � II IIIIIII, i �I°lu ulu ulu I�u II II IiIIIIiPi° I (IIIIIII � 11 I II I ill III �I �IIII�iPi� I �II e(III 1111 2019 15,282 4,831 29,497 464 50,074 2,922 56 2,978 53,052 2020 12,951 4,793 24,349 350 42,443 2,394 92 2,486 44,929 2021 18,779 5,608 30,248 350 54,985 2,399 92 2,491 57,476 2022 20,657 6,561 30,373 350 57,941 2,404 92 2,496 60,437 2023 22,256 7,088 30,498 350 60,192 2,409 92 2,501 62,693 2024 23,887 7,618 30,623 350 62,478 2,414 92 2,506 64,984 2025 24,958 7,975 30,750 350 64,033 2,419 92 2,511 66,544 2026 25,654 8,216 30,876 350 65,096 2,424 92 2,516 67,612 2027 26,124 8,414 31,004 350 65,892 2,429 92 2,521 68,413 2028 26,553 8,635 31,131 350 66,669 2,435 92 2,527 69,196 2029 26,991 8,849 31,260 350 67,450 2,440 92 2,532 69,982 2030 27,401 9,038 31,388 350 68,177 2,445 92 2,537 70,7141 38 Page D-68 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 11 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. KeyWest "Standing Take-of f s l# InternationalAirport From the 2013 NEM Update: "....due to the length of the runway at KWIA, the air carrier and commuter jet aircraft perform an engine spool-up prior to brake release. The noise modeling assumes all Boeing 737, Airbus A 319, and CRJ/700/900 aircraft will perform this operation prior to departure." 39 Noise Exposure Maps Update KeyWest "Standing Take-of f s" InternationalAirport Response from Delta: "We are working on this, but data is difficult to come by. Standing takeoffs were mandatory on our 737-700 f leet but recommended on the A319. On the CRJ-700 fleet, it looks like we dispatch with a standing takeoff instruction based on a load factor of 80% or greater. I'm trying to nail down frequency of occurrence for both mainline and CRJ-700 f leets. I haven't heard from Republic about the E-Jets." 40 Page D-69 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June 1, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Rg .............. Public Participation KeyWest International Airport The airport operator must af ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 41 Page D-70 DRAFT DOCUMENT " SUBJECT TO REVISION ar...... I KEAVWEST kN The Flonda Keys 'a4aadd II .1 f � I ( Ou Only Daily Newspaper,Est 1876 'C Box 1800,Key West FL 33041 , t 219 F,( )295-8025 1°,alb '.,com AIRPORTSMONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF Account:KEY WEST FL 33040 M �PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA �MIRY m m voice mm mm m- ll" 1 1COUNTY OF MONROE � x. RM IT CONCERNMAY at � Floridathis 22nd that a meeting ill° held f a tm Richard Strickland Betre the undersigned authority personally ap1peared KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AMPOU Ser4or DimKtor of Aiqports COMMIRTEE ON NOISE Ke West International A C._-rtA, t FL t 0 CFR TITLE 14 PART ISO 1 KPy West Citizen dailyNOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Monroe County will twt a Public publishednewspaper in Key West,in Monroe ,Florida;that the attached Meetin Tuesday,June 1, 201 at 2:00 pm. copy of advertisment,being a legal notice in the matter of MEEMING 6.1 was at the publishedin said newspaper in h issues of, $4ARVEV GOVERNMENT CENTER 1200 Truman Avenue Sunday,May 23,202,1 Upstairs in the Commission a r Key ®Florida 3 AND Affiant further says that mpublished in Key via a virtual meeting connection at West in II rmnewspapers fbre been continuously lip I in saidMonroe County,Florida every day,and Persons interested In this issue are in t- has been entered as periodicals matter at the post office in Key West in said ed to attend.Pewns ma t attend Monroe County, n r periodr preceding toelectronically n rti uwishing to at of �"q�a the nth nfurther q� ��c=e , � h commissiondialing neither paid nor pmmised any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate, r r r securing this r Oo - rad the Webi- ti M The ubaic is further advised that some d or a the m the Monroe Coin Cmmo, mm�W the Cmm�m ion/ i Council members an m their appoint- ed representativ than incorporated cities of Marathon,Key Colony Beach, Affirmed 1, bei Jug 1 IL t o the iIIII of m 9 m� r m representatives of ttm Tourist Develop- ment Council and t mm a Ad- visory Committee member may attend q the ineeting and discussitems t t may come before their respective commis� sions.councils,or advisory boards. i Pursuant'to Semon 286.0105,Florida Publicri 061l Statutes,notice is mm that if a p r- .oe son decided to appeal any decision mama aid it rest any commissionMy matter considered at sucharia s our mee s, 0i n a record the pm c ims s® and that.for such pur- pow.he i�ay need to ensure that Personally Known__2L Produced Identificationverbatim record of the proceedings is made,m ich record includes the testi- monyand evidence upon which the ap- Type of Identification Produced peal is to be based. ADA Aisistance, Any individual rwed- ing special accornmadations at this y7 y Ra,'it II b ,�r�>�� un sa-P dp+ Imq� tiU dm� tu a dlu° i�m sPm�ldcmm- d u V qy I1 ai> �a d k lr a a ,cop � the CoinAdministrator's Office, „J/Q at( )2924441,Monday through Fri- 04 day(eiduding holidays), t n the h hour hoursof 8.30 ,m .and " .rn.and in /� U� 4 4 P 4( 1 M4IMdq d R ter than ()calendar ilays prior t � �� r rm� w ��i f� � f f ('. j f y� / ff fi � (�� 4%, '7 the scheduled m tmmm®if you are h am- mO M� DII err o....,, ......... . ..... —— _ Page D-71 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm6 October 5, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-72 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West Internntionnl Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, October 5t",2021 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/88022353838 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 880 2235 3838. Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. June 11t, 2021 B. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Aircraft Operations Development 2. Flight Track development 3. Progress and Future Tasks 4. Public Participation 5. NEM Documents Sections 1, Z & 3 for Public Review C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. NIP Status To-date 2. KWBTS Project Recap 3. Building A - Phase 1: Construction Summary 4. Building A - Phase 2: Construction 5. KWBTS - Final Phase: Bid Process 6. Rough Schedule for the Current and Future NIP D. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports E. Nomination of an Ad-Hoc Committee Member to represent aviation. F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (S) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711." Page D-73 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 5 t"1 2021 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates Peter Horton Andrea Haynes Marlene burazo Dr. Sandy Quillen (via Zoom) Nick Pontocorvo Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML & A, Noise Program Coordinator Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick b'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager Roberta DiPiero, Homeowner A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the June 1st, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Peter Horton made a motion to approve the minutes; Sandy Quillen seconded the motion. The minutes were approved as presented. Noise Exposure Maps Update 1. Aircraft Operations Development Deborah presented the number of aircraft operations reported by the FAA from October 1, 2020 - August 31, 2021. She mentioned that the September 2021 data would not be available until the 20t" of October and would be added to this data to complete the 12 months of data needed for the Existing Condition. Based on analysis of the Flight Radar24 data from October 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021, Deborah presented the day/night split and runway utilization by aircraft category. Once the September data is added, these results may change. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 October 51 2021 Page D-74 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 5'. 2021 Meeting Minutes Deborah presented the FAA's APO Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) for Fiscal Year 2027. She mentioned that she has asked the FAA for permission to use FY'2028 rather than FY'2027. The final documentation will be submitted to the FAA in early 2023, and the regulations call for the forecast year to beat least five years beyond that year. Deborah described how "Stage Length" is used in the AEDT model to represent the flight distance from takeoff to landing and is a proxy for the aircraft weight. The weight associated with the stage length is based on a load factor of 65% and the amount of fuel needed for the flight distance. She presented common destinations from KWIA and their associated stage length. She then presented two graphics illustrating the EMB-175 profiles for departures and arrivals. The graphics included actual data from Flight Radar24 as well as the standard profiles included in the AEDT model. The departure profile graphic clearly illustrated the "hold down" procedure beginning at a distance of approximately 3 nmi from brake release. The arrival profile graphic illustrated that arrivals are following a standard 3-degree approach to the runway. 2. Flight Track Development Deborah presented ten graphics illustrating flight tracks from the FlightRadar24 data. These included both West flow and East flow for AC/AT Jet, AC/AT Prop, GA Prop and GA Jet. One graphic illustrated helicopter flight tracks and another illustrated touch-and-go flight tracks. She indicated these would form the basis for the flight tracks that would be modeled in AEDT. 3. Public Participation Deborah presented the current timeline for completion of the NEM Update, and highlighted opportunities for public input and opportunities for the public to review and provide comments on draft document sections. She emphasized the importance of the public's input since the FAA would be monitoring the level of public participation in the process. Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized that input from the committee and the public is very important to this process. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 October 51 2021 Page D-75 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 5'. 2021 Meeting Minutes Deborah briefly described the contents of draft document sections 1, 2, and 3. She provided copies to the committee members and the public in attendance and encouraged everyone to read these documents and provide her with feedback, particularly if anything wasn't clear or easily understood. A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1: Construction Summary 3. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction 4. KWBTS Final Phase: Bid Process A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Deborah presented a rough schedule for the current and future NIP, based on current information and the schedule for completion of the NEM Update. Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Five calls/emails about NIP participation • Five calls/emails regarding noisy aircraft • Four calls regarding aircraft flying directly over La Brisa. • One call regarding a helicopter circling over the Golf Course 2. Airport Noise Report The following articles were mentioned: • #21: New Material Could Cut Engine Noise on Takeoff by 16 dB Boeing 737-10 Reducing Noise by 50% Searching for Sources of Noise on Aircraft Wings • #23: United Airlines to Buy 100 Regional Electric Aircraft Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 October 51 2021 Page D-76 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 5'. 2021 Meeting Minutes • #25: Bill Requires FAA to Provide Noise Policy Review Update $75M for Sound Insulation Near Military Bases • #27: Infrastructure Bill Provides $25M for Airports Electric Motor Could Power the Future of Aviation Propulsion Bill Introduced to Reestablish EPA Noise Office • #28: Measures to Mitigate Military Aircraft Noise Efforts to Reduce Airframe Noise • #29: Noise Footprint of Electric Air Taxi Shape-Memory Alloys to Quiet Landings • #30: FAA CLEAN III Program • #31: Bill "Restore Everyone's Sleep Tonight" reintroduced in House Study on Human Response to UAM Noise • #32: Airbus Unveils Plans for CityAirbus EVTOL Discussion/Nomination of New Member Peter Horton nominated James Seadler, American Airlines Properties Representative to represent aviation. Marlene Durazo seconded the motion. James Seadler was unanimously approved by the committee. Other Discussion The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:25 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 October 51 2021 Page D-77 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION K, ey West pa fnal Aiirport ............. Internatio i pil Meetingof th Ad Hoc Committee on Noise Tuesday, 5th, Exposure Map Update Noises 4 Existing Condition KeyWest Aircraft Operations Reported by the FAA October 1,2020-August 31,2021 tt��t8i0It8l �� , Itinerant Local Air Air General Total Date Carrier Taxi Aviation Military Total Civil Military Total Operations Oct,,,,20 1,035 395 2,138 21 3,589 166 5 185 3,774 INN 20 1,218 466 1,960 17 3,661 95 4 99 3,760 IC::� 6 ,596 2,.734 3 i Y 878 202 11 213 5,69°n Jan 21 1,809 620 3,261 4.5 5,681 222 14. 236 5,917 II:::::'elb-21 1,592 659 3,356 32 5,639 206 1 207 5,846 IMair,,,21 2,229 774. 3,730 61 6,794 254 8 262 7,056 Alpir,,,,21 2,258 .768 3,361 22 6,409 248 10 258 6,667 I ay,,,,21 2,286 633 3,556 44 6,519 412 16 4.30 6,949 Jun,,,,21 2,254 525 2,544 41 5,364 292 6 298 5,662 JuII,,,,21 2,097 504 2,381 26 5,002 128 2 130 5,132 Aug,,,,21 1,863 3 4 2,14.0 26 4,397 46 4 4 4,441 Tota 1: 20,237 6,235 31,107 354 57,933 2,279 83 2,362 60,295 Page D-78 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION frp,a Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... Day/Night Split KeyWest Reported by FlightRadar24 International Airport October 1,2020—August 31,2021 DEPARTURES ARRIVALS OVERALL CATEGORY DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT AC/ATJET 76% 24% 96% 4% 85% 15% AC/AT PROP 81% 19% 100% 0% 90% 96% GA 80% 20% 99% 1% 89% 11% GA JET 78% 22% 99% 1% 88% 12% HELO 77% 23% 89% 11% 89% 11% MIL 71% 29% 83% 17% 77% 23% DAY=07:00 AM THROUGH 9:59 PM NIGHT=10:00 PM THROUGH 06:59 AM ANALYS11SIR L'I SS SU1�:.,11111:,,:,,:,CT""""0 CHANGE Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Runway Utilization KeyWest Reported by FlightRadar24 Intern Li n 1Airport October 1,2020—August 31,2021 DEPARTURES AC/ATJET AC/AT PROP GA GA JET MIL OVERALL RUNWAY 09 DEPARTURE PERCENTAGE 90•/ 89% 89% 89% 83% 89% RUNWAY 27 DEPARTURE PERCENTAGE 10•0 11% 11% 11% 17% 11% TOTAL DEPARTURE PERCENTAGE 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ARRIVALS AC/ATJET AC/AT PROP GA GA JET MIL OVERALL RUNWAY 09 ARRIVAL PERCENTAGE 86% 88% 88% 86% 100% 87% RUNWAY 27 ARRIVAL PERCENTAGE 14% 12% 12% 14% 0% 13% TOTAL ARRIVAL PERCENTAGE 100•0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Page D-79 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Future Condition KeyWest APO Terminal Area Forecast Summary Report Intlemia io a]Airport Forecast Issued May 2021 u�i.u�IVu uiuuu�uuiuuu�uu i u. ul i�iu ui uu lull luu.ili uui liuu i.iuu ilU�iuui i.a iuulu��Ui iuul.. piuiii ui ui puuu ui i ,, luuuuuii uu .. uuuuuuu..a �� puuuuu uui uui iiii�� uuuuuuu �� IIIIII 2019 15,282 4,831 29,497 464 50,074 2,922 56 2,978 53,052 2020 12,951 4,793 24,349 350 42,443 2,394 92 2,486 44,929 2021 18,779 5,608 30,248 350 54,985 2,399 92 2,491 57,476 2022 20,657 6,561 30,373 350 57,941 2,404 92 2,496 60,437 2023 22,256 7,088 30,498 350 60,192 2,409 92 2,501 62,693 2024 23,887 7,618 30,623 350 62,478 2,414 92 2,506 64,984 2025 24,958 7,975 30,750 350 64,033 2,419 92 2,511 66,544 2026 25,654 8,216 30,876 350 65,096 2,424 92 2,516 67,612 2027 26,124 8,414 31,004 350 65,892 2,429 92 2,521 =68,413 *M 2028 26,553 8,635 31,131 350 66,669 2,435 92 2,527 69,196 2029 26,991 8,849 31,260 350 67,450 2,440 92 2,532 69,982 2030 27,401 9,038 31,388 350 68,177 2,445 92 2,537 70,714 Noise Exposure Maps Update � AEDT Stage Lengths KeYWeSt g Stage Length represents the flight distance from takeoff to landing Inte,matilaL and is a proxy for the aircraft weight. The weight associated with the stage length is based on a load factor of 65%and the amount of fuel needed for the flight distance. Destination Airport Code Distance from EYW Stage Length ............................. Statute Miles Nautical Miles Ft.Lauderdale FLL 144.9 125.9 1 Miami MIA 125.4 108.9 1 Orlando MCO 268.1 233.0 1 Tampa TPA 240.2 208.8 1 Atlanta ATL 645.8 561.2 2 Charlotte CLT 735.7 639.3 2 Dallas DFW 1089.1 946.4 2 Washington,DC IAD 1022.9 888.9 2 Chicago ORD 1251.4 1087.4 3 Newark EWR 1195.6 1038.9 3 Note:The use of radar-based trajectory data alone to estimate an aircraft's takeoff weight is not recommended. Page D-80 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 4000 ttr ► ,r( FlightRadar24 data for s �t► ,`�:,t. Oct. 1 2020 throw h Dec.81 2Q2.1 `"� •''•-,"•`�,"• '= ; ' i,.,.�sr- �� ,►. -+fit~ � +� 0 00. 0 • 4 i�a♦� �`,; 1 �r•11� err�r�r�1 43000 �. 00) (00a ONO" to to 0 • )� `1. ail) f 0 Z-40S oo "(• -��,A K til 1 0 ♦�► ♦*' �1!, •,'r, *�, ♦'rllI '!MiVV"Ill�i'�'( i✓I►1� Vkr► 1(M_ • �• ., �) ' �' . )µsr' ♦ "fir♦��'��r•��) (•J�►,i�AW'07 o�*0 it A i ♦ � ! � 10 • I�t) �4 to 1000 - r �tl (), • ♦.- � �O'n poll �• a � ;�t Distance(Il _-1 Ilgh'tf(d 1!41 comml I ell amiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimStage I..ell a swOmStage I...ell 3 7 II:N B 17 - II'1 II'1 II V II....S 40)0 ((0!iw(•i) •)1 A 0)♦ r) f1 41((O(0)(((4O)4lr),O) �)�♦ (�+•11M�i�1wM�tl))1��1f�)•s��A��Il1 Flight Radar24 data for •�r •to O'(W•f��r:+r«.��r:�►�►s r �r)�+a ;w) Oct. 1,202t,through Dec.31,202146'.� . ..90(0610:(01(t*:(00�.w.,►.��► �►� ♦ ♦ •00((Wo4toW:tr#W(IMl44tl►)1(ow 46010, 7.f1C1 —— _ _ _ #r 0♦ r)Itr#) 11,M./M",tlo)'t�)'((r►( ) 0 r . 1000 0)1.910,'6 Klf))1 0(**r ttMl •)� � •e*)^(f•:*(*!))at*Imo))). go ;�^ ��*II't�•1 tl�)rtt�11 ta��t�1 (41:01010410))1r Mrtlrttc,(If 0 0(tto•ton•1Afw)1A A($#(•0( r • • •0 •*)tot*•),t tot 0to♦ ♦) • 600 • (�►(r�•fit,♦7•�)tr(•��t�.w" � � � ��. �..._ ��l+ct�lMllFt(Ftl►(•f,i.f�1�11fof 0 t` 400 �)1)��♦t t1�t(�'f1�fIDS1'c�1�� 006)to no MOO,*(Welo•M `)�1)�♦1•()�tl i ry �t►-fit► (w rM f1)'O)(46;0)4' ,**A' ;! )i ,"444 i)*M` 1.1))-, 61(lttrl*I Opt•. • a Distance(Il 8 Page D-81 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION NMI Noy, IUW 11 d I6� r East Flow — AC/AT Jet Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 uull�o<vvvlHHuuum��ntl�ul��oq��io�oolllollollollollollollollollol�l�llollollollollollollollloollollo�oo�o�o�o�o�o�oollll00000lnll0000llrinl�l�ool�s��a��l�iol�oll�ollollooulti��uu�uuvuur„«ul �Il��arr��r ; NJ w� Legend III 9 mIIIIIIIIIIIIIMNI1tN0111iSii1lYlGh'w WV,VINWNYiASS11YG1@i�!!I I`;: i� �I� ,V'Ydr,MWN"rZ�/d�0///'1tiiII,aYli�1l//0,7�7Nl,GLdrIN",,,IDJJ/, East Flow — AC/AT Prop Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 III � VU�f�id'Ifd�I �IIII011� l�dl/t�rrD�7arc'ririNViI�,TY�r„�A�t��rf�dNID��Nioi�(dNNP�fNJi�"�'d➢�,/Cri�Ey/� ,) rlff frjSr f rf'� ,o,lr ai /�� rr of I I Odd �h 10 Page D-82 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 51 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION ��wai�rewaml�m��n�lraaurainii,,,�ii�y�i�fouyy��uiur'r�iuuuululuuluirran,uu�rnuui��r� ?� iliil r�uuuuiu��nr East Flow — GA Jet Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 III'��O�VIAYOV�!f/�1111644ti��11011�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�IIfOf0�11�11�11�11�11�11�11�11��44��II�II�II�IIII�r�r�r�r�r�rff�f�I�tl��f0��r�r�r�II��IIIIII��II�IIIIIMl��9ti�1ti1'tl�1��'�l(91G�1� fBWr91��'�fP��l'N��il�Jl��a46�Df 9��fa gend Mg Iflllu�""�`i,uIV I r �f i r 0 ITV 11 IIIIIIIIIIII tllll � dfYf�NI'Y�,�'k97.�/G�'IIE�Y1d�N7 East Flow — GA Prop Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 D o� YJui 1 J {�➢,ar r��,�. ' iriuu o9 r�J�IY�� r!a r r �r r,N" r r 1,1�kr fii��I r ANC' Il n "44dwa yrr arall r1bylt.frrarki, Rwnway i 12 Page D-83 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION l // J ✓% ... ram,, r /, / / rii r / A,�r'��rull:�rs �kral,�ulll�l�ur�u»»»r»uu�J,,,,,,ylylflrJlllla»n,�mmriaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,�ciai/� iiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa//aaaaiiiiiaaaai,,,aaaoaiiaaa///a/i/iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiioo:; /aaiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiioaaiaaaai/lie„✓i/iaaarrrraaaaaaar/a All Helicopters Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 fora // ' r J / r „ lff g/ � r \ ��%�, /1��/ ,d,,j!I,Jkl° �.� ��'t �"� � ,rrilw:�i;) �i%'1' �'i, ✓ �: ��"., „� Ip%<� � � I�""; k,,!�%��` /%r," 1; ;,, l � �r,,I�rr,�✓� 1./O,y,. <;is rll� / u %% sl� 'JJ% r'�r l,Ih, 1�91�✓'- � / / �/,,,,/ �� '� rt,r J / 1 �lii� r/,,, !((Vf�1lllur'uiiplll i i��ill�llllll1��lll�III� �� /r 6��1d -/fr''f4 r,''/lrl�„ P1 � f // � III'q�:� a ihll Illlllllluuuuuuul r," / /off f/Y{`it/��I/1 /�r,;, U�,� �f � � I!'��f % ,,, Illuuu Itilltilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII il� „r1' , �' �tirJ r aV ;', rc f � �� /i';�dJl,,,, `'➢�' I ul �i�t a pr;➢ r Irr� rr y �� I Legend 'Pa,„w H'rOvr.ldwy ru ks,, Ilm »'n VR�41� 13 / r r r /r i r / r / xn�wmrrt�l�m�ii�iHerma��rmnuuuuli�l»ui,»��aai»��»uouluuuuuuulurrrrrrrrrraunmmvluuriaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiawr�uiirar�� aaaiaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiii000aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiaaiiiiaioiiiiiiiiiiii%aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai riaaaiiiiiiii000a/iaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiai,iiiiiiaia/a/aaaaaaaa. Touch-and-Go Patterns Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 o Ihnlol��lui,Il�Iluuuuur�rr�,hh�,illuuulluuulluuulluuulll�I�uuulluuulluuulluuulluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuull��iullululG«�,,,,hlolouuuuuuuuuuuulluilcliulhs,I��cu�cm�,,,,I�,IshIIIIIIIIUII�u�luk��Ill�rwm�IlG�mll�i�lrlw�l��sl�culs<�s��i�c5�„�,IISK��c�,wrm��Isi�rlrrHarlararalirug,�IrlrlrlrlrlrlUrJJrJJrJJrJJrJrJ,r,J,rJ,J,J,J,J»»,rrrrrraaaaiaaaiaaaaiii/iiia��,��/a��a/ae�,,,,,,r�,,,.�//��. ��,, Y J I� I / ,V r / r i ✓ s I�lu 'I III'iuVllllp VIII or�� Legend )Ad Rio"��'.oa III 4@1 14 Page D-84 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION >si !�i'-r%%, „�/�%j/fir Jk i �%,� %%'% /fr%% ✓�,°�r,l 'A�,% rf �Jl��"7nI0,Nlilw�Vri�l//Nu00r�I�IJAhI„✓�!dlld"�N./>r?A�q��4'2 West Flow — AC/AT Jet Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 Illdl d1G1��9`0"V(I�G0��11NNI�NIi�dnlNl�G![1V�IN1�(f01W'�I'N�1f01��1�f�>I�D�D�lS1�kb1S�DIN(S�IS��1�hV!�SD�SG11�S1�Ni�YfCNN,T,�VVS>uYhYI�IrUl111�D,71NIS�I�GI�O�IlU111 0 11110 110 110 11JJ00000000010�(�/�°;�Jl1VY/%l/I'�Ir��//G�!//�/��l�ME�UY//�/��rk�!�J?�;r/ir�r�`�VI%,,,,�A'N�.�1V�,>U4�N I of II. l I ! r r r �i r , r / r r r r / r I " Ism I r, r/ ,. III (<%>. rrr / i 1I�// �;'' /,i � ,,,W�{6 r;�p r r2"' iwr`,� ww�,,• II �/H, ; ��I %� 1l' �,/i!r/ �, f �r�/� � �/f,o�1,JJ r✓/is l r /i )J�i n �I 15 77777 ,... il 111 11 1111 111 In 111 11 1 ', / rrri /, 1i MANTE, HEREUPON,,,� �r r ,f r � r �� r ,r r r I"M�rrauumllMlmlmr�llllllnna!u�r�w^Ill�ulrrr�uurr Ivu��.��w/�iif�f�f��aa.��u� I� �a>�loriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil��il�/a�/iiaiiofG/aiii�vol�/rrrfra�ur�/r��a��> �u+Url��/�v/i�ul/�rerr��,»�✓„�!�-, `��rinuml�a��,�r� West Flow — AC/AT Prop Oct.1, 2020 — Aug. 31, 2021 uolIn uolill�l�co�n ul�oouolH�w�i«UauN�lY��lrrr��tiw � molu��iu�lloll�ll�u��ranr�r�rrr��rn��r�� ,�riiiiiiiiiy�� au/iri;r��,�lu, l,,�w,��> ,,r,,�l t, 7 III I I / / / i r I r r r- r- k f l � I i IIIII II lu I Ir r r, r ✓.r�f/3'/'P;.. ',�, ,..`�/ � rii rrrr.r/iir/..I �� r/� r,7n„//,, r ,.�/i� ;n:i.., 1l`,.,t,, �... r, r / Legend rk S'OXI1 16 Page D-85 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 11 1,�rfI� �I//l /�i ,,�//� „ r r�r„ /i / o., r /,,,,,,r .,� MEMM, dII �� .� �iAIOGr�IS 1%N�� //r�r��,,a,�,,,,�i/,�ji��r,,,;f,�l,„/�J�t�r,/�,r i�l�,.rk///,,rl it r;r/ " //r/DJir7/W�h�lld��Il/J�'L9G!�//rr/ West Flow — GA Jet Oct.1, 2020 —Aug. 31, 2021 J� � j/ � %/�r �✓ /r,%, �r a r I 1 I/�1, VI n I i i- „'s„ ��/%//",„f" ///'� �pp� %:�r i ✓. ml of r,/P Ir, I�� lIr r/�i� 1� yh, r�/�%I��'I' ✓l� r/,r�7 u/y�j�;, / I I��IIr I 11 r �� l v %� /yl'�r1�rJ�rr ��r!�o f i4m r�,.� r�� n�r ��♦`NV f,V / j��',INr�/�; a' r I r r ' ITV 17 gi ddd�l2�m"r," (/',a r. IIN 7m 'N'IQY!Gr'AY;y!INN 'Iltl'9',7bNLiagpHV',!V11111P''J;"Rr%/'F�'l1iVJ�WnIII//"N":krnW'„//l'„PoYiW N///NAG' .,NWYY�NUC(�Yu"'6(rtri(?Nm INNtr'71G'WPoIY;"Ji�fll%111N'Idi Yii IWRIMUMMOM West Flow — GA Prop Oct.1, 2020 — Aug. 31, 2021 IiIIIIOIfI f[ollf wW�" �Ill�lllr/l (%Pr4Ji�fi y, Grk ,ei'AW/ aPRfl,� dIstrr�pi,rtIr«a„ ryr' u'u'Iluuuu a II °'i I 'u Itj a�� fj � p�i�rJl%%ill« "1rf,,rf,�r" �;✓� r i ,r �i� 'fi-;ll%/W��'r;r�( 'r�,'°r; i IIII I % �,�'��r�r J��„rWr�ll B�1wrNrol diwrm,e�,:�j �� iulutiwi4Vr�� ' m�. Ilxk ��`�IYG"V+gl' 18 Page D-86 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Key West Progress International Airport • Draft v2 NEM Sections 1, Introduction, 2, Jurisdictions and Land Use were transmitted to the FAA on August 19th, 2021, for their review and comment. • Draft v2 NEM Section 3, Airport and Airspace Considerations was transmitted to the FAA on September 15th, 2021, for their review and comment. • The FAA provided comments on Draft v2 NEM Sections 1, Introduction, 2, Jurisdictions and Land Use, and Section 3, Airport and Airspace Considerations on September 17th, 2021. • Comments were incorporated and Draft v3 NEM Sections 1, 2, and 3 were resubmitted to the FAA for f inal review Sept. 20-23. • Presenting Draft v3 NEM Sections 1, 2, and 3 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on October 5th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Sections 1, 2, and 3 is scheduled for Oct. 5th - Nov. 8th 19 Noise Exposure Maps Update _10 Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest Intern dional Airport • FlightRadar24 data for FY'21 has been purchased, and data has been processed for October 1, 2020, through August 31, 2021. September 2021 will be processed after FR24 data is available(early October). • AEDT flight tracks are being developed using radar-based trajectory data from FR24. • Preliminary Fleet Mix, Runway Use, Day/Night Split have been developed based on October 1, 2020, through August 31, 2021, FR24 data. Will be finalized following addition of September 2021 FR24 data. • Future Fleet Mix is being developed with input from Richard Strickland regarding known/anticipated changes in aircraft fleet. • Plan to present Preliminary Aircraft & Airport Operations Data during the Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting on December 7th, 2021. Public Review & Comment on Preliminary AC & Airport Ops Data is scheduled for Dec 7tn _ Jan 10th 20 Page D-87 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION t, Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest International Airport • Development of the Existing Condition Noise Contours and Evaluation of Impacts is scheduled for completion by January 24th, 2022. • Development of Future Condition Noise Contours and Evaluation of Impacts is scheduled for completion by February 25th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 4, Existing Condition Noise Exposure is scheduled for completion by February 7th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 4 is scheduled for February 14th- March 18th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 5, Future Condition Noise Exposure is scheduled for completion by March 11th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 5 is scheduled for March 14th- April 15th, 2022. 21 Noise Exposure Maps _10 Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest InternaLional.Airport • Plan to present Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours (not Document Sections 4 & 5) to the Ad-Hoc Committee on March 1st for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours is scheduled for March 1st - April 4th • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 6 Updated Program Areas is scheduled for completion by April 15t, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 6 is scheduled for April 4th- May 6th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. 22 Page D-88 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 51 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION t, Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest International Airport • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. • Plan to present Draf t v3 NEM Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on June 7th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Sections 41 51 6 and 7 is scheduled for June 7th-July 15th • Preparation of NEM Version 1 (all six sections and associated appendices) is scheduled for completion by July 1st, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v1 is scheduled for July 5th- August 5th, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v2 is scheduled for August 22nd- September 16th, 2022. 23 Noise Exposure Maps _10 Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest InternaLional.Airport • Advertisement of Availability of NEM Document for Public Review is scheduled for the week of September 26th, 2022. • Plan to present NEM v3 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on October 4th f or public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for October 15t- 315t, 2022. An electronic copy will be posted on the airport website. A hard copy will be available at the Key West library. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of Ad Hoc Committee meeting and public review and comment) is scheduled for completion by November 25th, 2022. • Plan to discuss NEM v3 with the Ad-Hoc Committee again on December 6th, 2022. Additional public review & comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for December 6th- 31St, 2022. • Preparation of NEM v4 for BOCC approval is scheduled for completion by December 31St, 2022. 24 Page D-89 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 51 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION t, ............... Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWe,st, International Airport • NEM v4 for the BOCC Agenda Package will be provided electronically by Tuesday, January 3rd, 2023. • BOCC Meeting Wednesday, January 18th, 2023. BOCC must approve submitting the NEM document to the FAA for formal review. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of BOCC meeting and additional public review and comment) and NEM v5 are scheduled for completion by February 3rd, 2023. • FAA Formal Review of NEM Document is scheduled for February 6th - May 5th, 2023. • Preparation of Grant Application for NIP based upon Updated NEMs is schedule for completion by May 31St, 2023. 25 Noise ExposureMaps Update Public Participation KeyWe,st, Intern dional Airport The airport operator must of ford interested persons adequate opportunityto submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 26 Page D-90 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 5, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise ExposureMapsUpdate NEM Section 1 r 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Part 150 Process 1.2 Key West International Airport NEM Update 1.3 History and Summary of the Noise Compatibility Planning Process at KWIA 1.4 Noise Exposure Map Checklist 27 Noise ExposureMaps Update NEM Section 2 r 2.0 MUNICIPAL JURISI)ICTIONS AND LAND USE 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Existing Land Use 2.2.1 Residential 2.2.2 Community Facilities 2.2.3 Parks and Recreational Properties 2.2.4 Historical Resources 2.3 Future Land Use 2.4 Demographics 2.5 Land Use Controls 2.5.1 City of Key West 2.5.2 County of Monroe 2.6 Land Use Compatibility Guidelines 28 Page D-91 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 5, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise ExposureMaps f NEM Section 3 Keywe.lst International Airport 3.0 AIRPORT AND AIRSPACE CONSIDERATION 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Airf ield Conf iguration 3.3 Airspace/Air Traffic Control Procedures 3.3.1 Neighboring Airport 3.3.2 Operational Procedures 3.3.3 Flight Corridors 3.3.4 Existing Published Approaches 3.4 Meteorological Data 29 Sectional Aeronautical Chart of Airport Vicinity..a� 820 W Long. "*�.. r� 81030'W Long. , M . mmmmn +q�� r _ PINE 1 S ,X 11 a ._ 'MIAMA /L f Cam' �M K m�'NA ppry5 Atl��Fn . ypp pp�� i. ��GYM W ��X.i.n R4N �W M'✓'"� 4Pka Ws'�'l l M'M.ey � M u galloof haw 3� • IW� � �; I M� " 1S �' " WESTNATI E,KEY ors e � See ��i' /�Kp�l�e CT 5761,* j owl �. 41 M 4 Yw �� Mll.b 4AMI M.IP�4■'��yp _ KEY WEST,INTL( � ' "roll W INTENSIVE�� b��pdp��'yy�1q/�5gy �i ' '� "�" ! �',Ply w� �'��R"� ' 124.025 95 u�b " . �� UIII ""•"'.. Overlapping Airspace 82°W Long. 81°30'W Long.,.,.TM.�+W `��" . . ...._. _.._....., .v.w._... .. �. _.._..... ... _._..... �. ...... ...., 20 w..w..,.w ,�,w.. .......,._�, .. ........ ......... ... ...,.,�.,,® ... ...... d� Page D-92 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN that a meeting will be held of KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 49 CFR TITLE 14 PART 150 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Monroe County will host a Public Meeting on Tuesday, October 5,2021 at 2:00 p.m. at the HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1200 Truman Avenue Upstairs in the Commission Chambers Key West, Florida 33040 AND via a virtual meeting connection at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/i/88022353838 Persons interested in this issue are invited to attend. Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc. zoom.us/j/88022353838. The public can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646)518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID#880 2235 3838. The public is further advised that some or all of the members of the Monroe County Commission,the Commission/Council members and/or their appointed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon, Key Colony Beach, Layton and the Village of Islamorada, representatives of the Tourist Development Council and their area District Advisory Committee member may attend the meeting and discuss items that may come before their respective commissions, councils, or advisory boards. Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, notice is given that if a person decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ADA Assistance: Any individual needing special accommodations at this meeting, due to a disability, should contact the County Administrator's Office, at(305)292-4441, Monday through Friday (excluding holidays), between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and no later than five(5)calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call '6711". Dated at Key West, Florida this 20th Day of September, 2021. Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, FL 33040 Page D-93 September 18,2021 Key West Citizen DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm7 December 7, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-94 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, December 7t",2021 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/82369077969 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 823 6907 7969. Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. October 5th1 2021 B. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Existing Condition Aircraft Operations Development i. Number of Operations ii. Day/Night Split iii. Runway Utilization iv. Stage Length Distribution v. Use of Back Taxi on Runway 09 vi. Use of Standing Takeoff Procedure 2. Existing Condition Fleet Mix and Flight Track development i. AC/AT Jet ii. AC/AT Prop i i i. GA Jet iv. 6A Prop v. Helicopters vi. Touch-and-Go 3. 2,000-ft Hold Down Procedure 4. Progress and Future Tasks 5. Public Participation ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711." Page D-95 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise SUBJECT TO REVISION Agenda for Tuesday, December 7th, 2021 Page 2 of 2 C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. Building A - Phase 1: Construction Summary 3. Building A - Phase 2: Construction 4. US Supply Shortages & "Buy American" Challenges 5. KWBTS - Final Phase: Bid Process 6. Rough Schedule for the Current and Future NIP D. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports E. Approval of Meeting Schedule for 2022 F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Page D-96 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 7". 2021 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Peter Horton Andrea Haynes Marlene Durazo Dr. Sandy Quillen Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML&A, Airport Noise Program Coordinator Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Peter Green, FAA ADO (via Zoom) Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager Roberta DiPiero, Homeowner John Genthert, Homeowner Joanne Tarantino, Homeowner David Langley, Homeowner (via Zoom) Susan Phillips, Homeowner (via Zoom) A quorum was not present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the October 5t", 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. Peter Horton mentioned that he did not attend the meeting via Zoom. The revised minutes will be presented at the next meeting for approval. Noise Exposure Maps Update 1. Existing Condition Aircraft Operations Development i. Number of Operations Deborah explained that OPSNET(formerly known as ATADS) is the official source of FAA air traff is operations and presented a def inition of terms used in the FAA's OPSNET. She then presented the OPSNET data for FY'21 which will be used for Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 December 71 2021 Page D-97 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 7". 2021 Meeting Minutes the Existing Condition. A total of 64,128 operations were reported by OPSNET for this period. She presented a table comparing the number of operations by category reported by OPSNET and collected by FlightRadar24 (FR24). She explained the use of a "proportionality constant" to scale the FR24 operations to match the OPSNET operations. Peter Horton questioned why nearly 20,000 operations were missing from the FR24 data. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the possible reasons for this, what other available data sources might be used to supplement the analysis, and how the proportionality constant was being used to account for the missing operations. Peter expressed concerned that the public will not trust the data being used to develop the contours. Deborah indicated she would go back and take another look at the FR24 data and other available sources of data prior to the next meeting. ii. Day/Night Split Based on analysis of the FR24 data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021, Deborah presented a table of the day/night split by departures vs. arrivals and aircraft category. The overall daytime vs. nighttime split for departures was 99% daytime and 1% nighttime. The overall daytime vs. nighttime split for arrivals was 98% daytime and 2% nighttime. iii. Runway Utilization Based on analysis of the FR24 data f rom October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021, Deborah presented tables of the daytime vs. nighttime departure and arrival runway utilization by aircraft category. The overall departure utilization was 88% on Runway 09 and 11% on Runway 27. The overall arrival utilization was 86% on Runway 09 and 14% on Runway 27. iv. Stage Length Distribution Deborah described how "Stage Length" is used in the AEDT model to represent the flight distance from takeoff to landing and is a proxy for the aircraft weight. Based on analysis of the FR24 data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021, she presented a table showing the distribution operations by stage length by aircraft category. v. Use of Back Taxi on Runway 09 Deborah explained the use of the back taxi procedure that provides an additional 274 feet of pavement for takeoff on Runway 09. Based on analysis of the FR24 data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021, Deborah presented a Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 December 71,2021 Page D-98 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 711, 2021 Meeting Minutes table of the use of the back taxi procedure by aircraft category for AC/AT JET, AC/AT PROP, and GA JET. vi. Use of Standing Takeoff Procedure Deborah explained the use of the standing takeoff procedure. She explained that the use of this procedure cannot be determined from the FR24 data, so she is conducting field observations this week to observe and document the use of the procedure. She presented a table of preliminary results which indicated the procedure was used by 62% of the AC/AT aircraft. The final results will be presented at the next meeting. 2. Existing Condition Fleet Mix and Flight Track Development Deborah presented tables of fleet mix (including the number of operations for each aircraft type in the fleet mix) and graphics of flight tracks by category. 3. 2,000-ft Hold Down Procedure Deborah explained the screening analysis that was conducted to determine how often EYW departures on Runway 09 were held down to avoid traffic from NAS KW. FR24 flight trajectory data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021 was plotted for the most frequently used commercial aircraft types and compared to the standard departure profiles from AEDT. The analysis revealed that the hold down occurred between 9% and 15% of the time. The FAA concurred that custom departure profiles did not need to be developed to model this procedure. 4. Progress and Future Tasks Deborah presented the current timeline for completion of the NEM Update, and highlighted opportunities for public input and opportunities for the public to review and provide comments on draft document sections. Preliminary noise contours are scheduled for presentation at the next meeting. 5. Public Participation Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized the importance of the public's input since the FAA would be monitoring the level of public participation in the process. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 December 71 2021 Page D-99 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise December 7". 2021 Meeting Minutes A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 1: Construction Summary 3. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction 4. US Supply Shortages & "Buy American" Challenges 5. KWBTS Final Phase: Bid Process A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Deborah presented a rough schedule for the current and future NIP, based on current information and the schedule for completion of the NEM Update. Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • One email about NIP participation • One call regarding noisy aircraft • Two calls regarding aircraft flying very low over La Brisa. 2. Airport Noise Report Articles from Volume 33, Nos. 33-41 were mentioned. Approval of Meeting Schedule for 2022 Since a quorum was not present, the schedule could not be approved. The proposed schedule will be presented at the next meeting for approval. The next meeting is March 1, 2022. Other Discussion The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:50 PM. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 December 71 2021 Page D-100 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December T. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ili 'Key West � I tionalk' irport Meetingof th Ad Hoc Comml*ttee on Noise Tuesday, 7th 12021 1 Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition KeyWest FAA's OPSNET (aka ATADS) Int r ti irport • OPSNET is the official source of FAA air traffic operations. • Data is reported to OPSNET by the Airport Traffic Control Tower(ATCT)and can be viewed on the FAA Operations&Performance Data Web site. • Airport Operations are defined as all arrivals and departures at an airport(overflights are not included). • Overflights are defined as Instrument Flight Rules(IFR)and Visual Flight Rules(VFR) operations performed by an aircraft that originates outside the towers'airspace and enters and exits the tower's or TRACON's airspace without landing. • Overflights also include helicopter operations that land or depart from an airport non- movement area or from an off-airport location. • These definitions were considered when comparing OPSNET to FlightRadar24 data. • OPSNET separates operations into Itinerant and Local. • Itinerant operations are separated into four categories:Air Carrier,Air Taxi,General Aviation, and Military. • Local operations are separated into two categories:Civil and Military. 2 Page D-101 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December T 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p -.......... ( Existing Condition KeyWest Aircraft Operations Reported by the FAA Internationat.Airport October 1,2020-September 30,2021 Itinerant Local Total Air Air General Date Military Total Civil Military Total Operations Carrier Taxi Aviation Oct-20 1,035 395 2,138 21 3,589 180 5 185 3,774 Nov-20 1,218 466 1,960 17 3,661 95 4 99 3,760 Dec-20 1,596 517 2,734 31 4,878 202 11 213 5,091 Jan-21 1,809 620 3,207 45 5,681 222 14 236 5,917 Feb-21 1,592 659 3,356 32 5,639 206 1 207 5,846 Mar-21 2,229 774 3,730 61 6,794 254 8 262 7,056 Apr-21 2,258 768 3,361 22 6,409 248 10 258 6,667 May-21 2,286 633 3,556 44 6,519 412 18 430 6,949 Jun-21 2,254 525 2,544 41 5,364 292 6 298 5,662 Jul-21 2,097 504 2,381 20 5,002 128 2 130 51132 Aug-21 1,863 374 2,140 20 4,397 40 4 44 4,441 Sep-21 1,326 358 2,057 2 3,743 90 0 90 3,833 Total: 21,563 6,593 33,164 356 61,676 2,369 83 2,452 64,128 ATADS:Airport Operations:Standard Report From 10/2020 To 09/2021 1 Facility=EYW Exposure Map Update Noises 4 ExistingCondition -1,00KeyWest OPSNET Definition of Variables InternaLional.Airport • Air Carrier.(AC)Aircraft with seating capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pounds,carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. • Air Taxi.(AT)Aircraft designed to have a maximum seating capacity of 60 seats or less or a maximum payload capacity of 18,000 pounds or less,carrying passengers or cargo for hire or compensation. • Civil.Operations by all classes of private and commercial takeoffs and landings at FAA and Federal Contract Tower(FCT)facilities. • General Aviation.(GA)Takeoffs and landings of all civil aircraft,except for air carriers or air taxis. • Itinerant.Operations performed by aircraft that land at an airport arriving from outside the airport area or depart from an airport and leave the airport area. • Local.Operations performed by aircraft that remain in the local traffic pattern,execute simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport,and operations to or from the same airport within a designated practice area within a 20-miles radius of the tower. • Military.(MIL)Operations by all classes of military takeoffs and landings at FAA and FCT facilities. Page D-102 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December T. 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p -.......... ( Existing Condition KeyWest Developed from the Flightradar24 and FAA OPSNET Data Intern,ationat.Airport October 1,2020—September 30,2021 Air Air Taxi General Military Total Carrier Aviation Operations OPSNET 21,563 6,593 35,533 439 64,128 FR24 18,236 7,400 18,988 12 44,636 Proportionality 1.18 0.89 1.87 36.58 1.44 Constant Sources: FAA OPSNET,2021,FlightRadar24,2021. Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Day/Night Split KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 InternaLional.AirportOctober 1,2020—September 30,2021 Departures Arrivals Aircraft Category Daytime Nighttime Daytime Arrivals AC/AT JET 99.0% 1.0% 95.9% 4.1% AC/AT PROP 99.4% 0.6% 99.6% 0.4% GA PROP 99.2% 0.8% 99.3% 0.7% GA JET 99.2% 0.8% 99.2% 0.8% OVERALL 99.1% 0.9% 98.0% DAY=07:00 AM THROUGH 9:59 PM NIGHT=10:00 PM THROUGH 06:59 AM Page D-103 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December T 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION frp,a Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... Departure Runway Utilization KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 International Air October 1,2020-September 30,2021 Runway 09 Runway 27 Aircraft Category g Y Daytime Nighttime Daytime Arrivals AC/AT JET 88.7% 81.8% 11.3% 18.2% AC/AT PROP 87.2% 81.8% 12.8% 18.2% GA PROP 88.1% 87.2% 11.9% 12.8% GA JET 88.9% 94.1% 11.1% 5.90//0 OVERALL 88.4% 85.2% 11.6% 14.8% OVERALL Runway 09:88.4% Runway 27: 11.6% ANALYS11S RESULI""S SUBJECT TO CHANGE Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Arrival Runway Utilization KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 InternaLional.AirportOctober 1,2020-September 30,2021 Runway 09 Runway 27 Aircraft Category g Y Daytime Nighttime Daytime Arrivals AC/AT JET 85.2% 84.9% 14.8% 15.1% AC/AT PROP 87.1% 93.3% 12.9% 6.7% GA PROP 87.0% 82.4% 13.0% 7.6% GA JET 85.1% 82.4% 14.9% 17.6% OVERALL 85.9% 84.8% 14.1% 15.2% OVERALL Runway 09:85.9% Runway 27: 14.1% ANALYSIS E IL S SUBJEc r,,,,ro CHANGE Page D-104 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation [�ecenm�er7' �O2l DRAFT DOCUMENT ' SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Keywest Stage Length Distribution International Airport Aircraft Stage Length 1 Stage Length 2 Stage Length 3 Stage Length 4 Stage Length 5 Category Stage Length Distance(nm) 0-500 Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Use of Back Taxi on Runway 09 KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 Aircraft Category Back Taxi to Use Full Runway Depart From Taxiway B Intersection Length AC/AT PROP 44% 56% 10 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION frp/a Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... Use of Standing Takeoff Procedure KeyWest Response from Delta Airlines Internationat.Airportand Consultant's Field Observation Delta Airlines: "The procedure is recommended for the A319, but not mandated. Republic (Delta Connection) reported their manuals do not mandate use of the procedure,so they felt it probably wasn't used very often." Consultant's Field Observation: Monday, December 6t" r /r �r Y.��Jp/rfa��t'/r6)t�%!�f�r�% r Y'�iil�i"I,Iryl�m lil{�ii IvNii� 4iu 4rp it • Tuesday,December 7t" � • Wednesday, December 8t" �' • Thursday December 9t" „� ryr' kj j w JJR; 1 ! IFF i Noise Exposure Maps Update -100 Use of Standing Takeoff Procedure KeyWest Consultant's Field Observation InternaLional.AirportResults So Far Based on 50 Departure Operations Aircraft Type Number of Number of Percent of YP O s p Standing Takeoffs Standing Takeoffs A319 17 13 76% ATR 8 3 37.5% E170 7 2 28.6% E 175 11 8 72.7 E190 4 2 50% CRJ7 2 2 100% H25B(Private) 1 1 100% 12 Page D-106 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation [)ecenmber7' 2O2l DRAFT DOCUMENT ' SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update ............... AC/AT Jet Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest International.Airport Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations Total Operations 21,563 76.37 13 14 Page [-1O7 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION e / / t f f / / f f f / f / I � / I � / / / i r / J � /i _ r r / I. « f / / 1 � I / J�1'I)ll��H1��fR01011 (� vM1dRb11 n d 15 o„ r Noise Exposure Maps Update AC/AT Prop Fleet Mix and Operations AirportKeyWest ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................--...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Dail/ Operations .........................................................................................................---...................................................................................................... B190 l 1900D 4 0.01 AT46i CVLP,DH8A DHC8 21457 6.73 AT76,D1-1813,DH8D DHC830 27 0.07 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I........................................................................ C208,KODI,PA11,PC12,TBM7,TBM9,TEX2 CNA208 1,826 5.00 D328 D0328 18 0.05 AC90,ACAM,13350,BE10,BE20,BE30,BE95, BE99,BEK,BE9T,C2,DHC2,DHC3,DHC6,E110, DHC6 2,051 5.62 JS31,M28,MU2,P180,SW2,SW3,SW4 ............................................................................................................................... CN35,SF34 SF340 107 0.29 SH36 SD330 103 0.28 Total Operations 6,593 18.05 16 Page D-108 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December 7, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION f/ i I III rl I n t, W r U1)' ' -'f,,,..' '�,,'�� wfi, fi��;/ rv✓ Ali/ ,s�f( /fl➢ /�''rC;ro�/l� / , � �'� �11 ' }i '"'�',i�✓i��y/�,�,rrr �`.. ,/r �y(! !' ,..r' , r /l r r ' i / 1 r5' a pl�ulu,WYI,II,a Ni1 o rrr � um J ! ge n d 0 Ru�rrrgr,u9 �h�I,,„, r r f O f AironvW Tuck NOW- '1 i J , I t 17 r, „ r r /e r / r r r, r i r r.I Al / , r / r r/ r / / I r / / � r ..rrrr.,....... r r / r _ / r / r / r /r r I / 1 /I / rr f / ✓� r,rr /r�/ II fi , Y II ;l uil �M JJ r r I I , / rvi ! �-,rrr '�/ ;1 � ;;yr. Y //✓rr,'ryrJ l(N'�. ;ems a rrrr I,I� t Ij , i , p' Vu W I wf / `u ` !� f �� ,�,( ufiW wudr"f' /�f / J�,?1✓"D, � �i'Jri;!(rr I�,yi�!"y rxi ,.�✓ r,, ,�' r, „�,�r �.c. ,J(rn ,.fir' '.In nl r,�i'I ,,,. r� ': %i1 i..� ,i1 Jr�r 'JIIP�/��, '�, I 0 uouuuuuuuul ^�� I III u Wlliillllllllll IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVtllllllllllllllllllllllllllJ I !�i a,,�I lull Elul 7, P- r uuuuuumiiiiuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuumiiiiuuuuml°°°uuuuml1°°I;;;;;i°i r y � r y r pp ., i IIII I.I r RAN oil; ry ��A a TJ aicio3 AtOT A kvpmk� A, 18 Page D-109 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION jjjtg�),r Y" Noise Exposure Maps Update GA Jet Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest International Airport ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................. ....................................................................Ave.r a.......e........... Actual AEDT Annual Daily g Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Operatins L.....T.........LE.X...................................................................................................................................................................................................... g..D..7..........1A.1............... 1.1.......................... Z..................... G 5,G 00 0 6 03 C25M C525C 221 0.61 I C650 CIT3 135 0.37 ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�. CL30,CL35,CL60 CL600 1,188 3.25 C25A...C25B..C500...C501...C525........ CNA500 ......... �.�... ........ 557 4.27 E5013,E545,E55P,SF50 CNA510 2,113 5.79 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................'. C25C CNA525C 168 0.46 ...�B.E4.W....C55.O.....��.�...�.��.....��.�...�...8.....�PC2.�4.............................................................................................................................................................�.��.��..�..g.................................................g.��.��..................................................�..��.�.........�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.� BE4,BE40 CNA560E 649 1.78 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... I C560 CNA560U 945 2.59 ................................................................................................,........................................................................................................................... C56X CNA560XL 1,482 4.06 C680,C68A,C700,HDJT CNA680 1,418 3.88 C750,CN7,F2TH,F2,GLF2,HA4T,J328 CNA750 687 1.88 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................d.............................................................................................................�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.� E550,EA50 ECLIPSE500 168 0.46 ...... ........ ............. ,F900.FA50 FA7X FAL90....., ......... �........... L 0EX 825 2.26 GLF3 GIIB 9 0.02 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................L...................................................................................................................................................................................... I GLF4 GIV 395 1.08 ......... .................. ......... .................. ......... .................. ......... ......... ........................... .................. ..................... GA5C,GA6C,GLF5,GLF6 GV 429 1.18 ............... ........ ............. ASTR,G150,G280,GALX,WW24 IA1125 326 0.89 M..U.3.O.P.R.M.1........................................................................................................................................................................................................................M U.3.�.�.1.................. .....................29.g..................... ....�..................... Total Operations 16,187 44.35 19 I 1 II � / r � 1M;f yr �4 IYt' J y �„ ,loll/ad��'//r�rl l\✓//, �e yrra� /n ,"-; 1 ..off' �;lr.� ,„d, A✓ �� / -,/i,.., ,�, //. , r a I) d I�r I �, ».,Vnt�i�n d�aruurw'nrr@°��R drWrm`,9�� 'd!aarmivW mi:ks war "'qhqwv,,RIpPA Tr'�,'vs 1 it i Gt t'px 20 Page D-110 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION en di f r.1 , 1 / f 1 // f D i 1 r J r r , r l � / / ! i r / r r/ I / / . 1 r � Nil � I I �., / � f��Iri mar.., // �,;;� �� ,/,. r V..., �v ov�:.r�/ •..,//,�l/ I i � t,'a /,d_ r/� ,,,,,,,,,,,/// „'��'%1r;,,r f��(l, 1,,,,, l� /,,��>%!�✓/�%�%ter l /, I f� v'rol /�� ✓f«1 way f, /6 �://�/ , / u, 1 jrr v,r n �I a � II YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY6 P�b�NIr1I�o��N+ ` m IF'�G� 21 r Noise Exposure Maps Update GA Prop Fleet Mix and Operations AirportKeyWest International Actual.. AEDT Annual..... Average Dailye ge Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Operatins AC50,AC56,AC68,AEST,138T,BE50,BESS,BE58,BE60,BE76,131\12P,131\12T,C303, gEC58P 3,095 8.4$ C335,C337,C340,C402,C404,C414,C421,NAVI,PA23,PA27,PA31,PA34,T337 C170,C172,C177,C72R,C82R,C82S,HUSK,PA22,PAT CNA172 1,351 I 3.70 C182,C185 CNA182 784 2.15 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................ C82T,P210,T206 CNA20T 281 0.77 C425,C441,M600,TBM$ CNA441 492 1 35 AA1,C140,C162,C207,CC19,CH7A,CH713,CRUZ,E300,E500,FDCT,FOX,GC1, GLST,LA4,LGEZ.LNP4,M200,M5,MITE,NG5,PA14,PA18,PA38,PP3,PREN,R400, COMSEP 3,088 8.46 RV12,S22T,SLG2,SR20,SR22,SX30,TRF1,LILAC,WH4 (A5,PETR,SREY DHC-2FLT 64 0.18 AA5,BE19,BE23,BE24,C150,C152,DA40,GA7,M20P,P28A,P28R,P28S,P28T, GASEPF 1,276 3.50 P28U,RV7,RV8,RV9,RV10,VELD,VR7 ...:AC1�1.:.:...:8.:3.:6T.....:.g.:E3.3.....:.g.E.:3.5.....:.g.E.:3.6.......13 .1-.1.7.......g.:T.:3.:6......C.180:.....:C.2.:0.:5.......C.:2.:1.0......C2.40......:C.:7.:7..R.......C.:O.:L3...................:.:.:.:.........................................................................:.:.:.........................................................................................:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: , COL4,EVOT,GA8,GLAS,LEG2,LNC4,M20T,P32R,P32T,P46,P46T,PA24,PA32, GASEPV 4,328 11.86 PA46,RV6,T210,TB20,TOGA (DA42,DA62,P68,PA30,PA44 PA30 1,847 5.06 P06T,P208,P212,PAY1,PAY2,PAYS,PAY4,TWEN PA42 180 0.49 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Total Operations 19,346 46.52 22 Page D-111 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION t : i li �%%f t""��i✓a n 1%//„,rr �'�Ili ' s �� !;u i r r 7i : t u, a i 5i end ' i o �� I�M d11��%'r� p bapffrtjul YIYr�w '�i�roiuiu�rw'p% :I r. F irygj �� 11 23 r ' j rlf u1 �I cur I i a I I S i �- ✓ I f I 1 o u r' it �j �Yor r , r / e � 9 � r � f �/r�r rl(!�f, rlU,��!L��y"'�'��yt,''�i,'f rmiyu�f,. -„ ,,I`,,,,r,L�,,� ✓�L��.� 7%� r ,; '� I�" .:a., �lP:r ff9"� ,viirr l' ,r�l;r r.i r,Jrf f f:r Ir „ ( ✓� ��'9"/ , f%� ! r/y,� .,.�. � 9 :,; �`';, � Ir✓r1`'��!O�Yw��l, :� �� Vi �iL'�,r"� v✓"„' /..; y% ,i� J t � ;i V s�' j i � (�%.�, ,,;��ir�t r /��✓'Ik='��i�Ji✓r ' G%f 'lyro '�` ��i � ✓�r9Yl��I�I ' rf r l I ( f7rll �/iJ ' Y { Jr 1 S f/ rsr� r III �" ryrypp pp � r � N�1NW�Iwt 1�111i� 4 h ,n d ,LJD'r Airpviw liarks I 24 Page D-112 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION it jjjtg�),r Y" Noise Exposure Maps Update Helicopter Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest International Aidport ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................--............................................................................................................................................................................................................ Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations B06,B407,B505 B206 74 0.20 B05,EC20,EC30,EC45,MD60ON EC130 80 0.22 R22,R44,R66, R44 1312 3.59 H60 S70 10 0.03 B212,B429,S76 S76 841 2.30 A10.9�....A5.5.�.,...A.S.�..S.......................................................................................................... .....SA.3..5.5.F................ ..............................9..5.............................. ............................0....2.�........... .....................................................................................................................................................................................................--............................................................................................................................................................................................................. Total 2,412 6.60 ............................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................ .......................................................... ................................................... 25 1 rf f / i I II r lull,I r I ll Yll u 1 1 1 l r / a t , 1 c 0 I�I r / h y f _ I r 1"'/ ��/i f J,,,'ir,,! � �y',;:ra,,,,,,r ,;/+�� iiiiii%/i �r,�y�'✓,,,i V f„ f,r�i r r , r I � � '( rift' ��i��(i, "�� rylltif.✓fi/U' ;,�;•, .� ,� �� /�,11 j „ ur" r r I/ C f r r r r A' � ,� X� �,,1,. ,,,,,j rho,; ;/fl �j��-" li/ %�l„r D/iL��.�!�%��`•�'; fi��%i, 'pu i of i , 0 r � r ,� ' ✓a,, � ��,�, y i,<,�� '' �,,,�� y�6�,yG li 1,rUlro1G"�;/�� ill �// i I I '�v.11Y �/ ✓, li , ,l" {; fi v! ,,ql/ll/ri�o,,,,,,, ,JI�/�f H,�li�,ry�y r 3�,rr, f//�Irr„a "r '��r, I f %e fr ,// 161,'�,r W ,�ai IAU"� 'X�f✓r� i r r I �yU� �/„ / ry� �� / i r II ,1 r 6 r I V / ! r u, s iiiilll IIIIIIIIIIII I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui iiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuum i II I VWoigiu'qr 0 Ve��W"unPNl VmVVqollW T01YmM,!k^ AX �yD#P*. .f*71toCkS yv 26 y ' Page D-113 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December 7, 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION it jjjtg�),r Y" Noise Exposure Maps Update Touch & Go Ops Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest hil Airport ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations AC50,AC56,AC68,AEST,68T,BE50,BE55,BE58, BE60,BE76,131\12P,131\12T,C303,C335,C337,C340, BEC58P 253 0.69 C402,C404,C414,C421,NAVI,PA23,PA27,PA31, PA34,T337 C170,C172,C177,C72R,C82R,C82S,HUSK,PA22, CNA172 823 2.25 PAT AA1,C140,C162,C207,CC19,CH7A,CH713,CRUZ, E300,E500,FDCT,FOX,GC1,GLST,LA4,LGEZ.LNP4, M200,M5,MITE,NG5,PA14,PA18,PA38,PP3,PREN, COMSEP 634 1.74 R400,RV12,S22T,SLG2,SR20,SR22,SX30,TRF1, ULAC,WH4 .... .A.5 B..... .E..1.9 B........E.2.3 4 C......B.E.2. ..... .1.S.O C.......1.5.2 DA...... .4.0 GA7...... ......................... ................................................... ....................................................................... .........................................................................A , M20P,P28A,P28R,P28S,P28T,P28U,RV7,RV8,RV9, GASEPF 659 1.81 RV10,VELD,VR7 �...C130,C30J ........ .......m. ......C130.E �. ........ 8....... ........ ......... .......m ........ 3 0.23 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: Tota 1 2,452 6.72 27 / r f AS dop 28 N. .,. �✓c. ;� / ;Gar.. 1� //��iii ,,/iii� � n.i ,.41 r r��' G; lr,d0 yl�wi i(1 i �f J �,,,,% 1 !✓r7;�F;�' tra'`!cif >` „"��Gyp';.,, "a;Hfwi�r !I`"��Ff�9�r��f,�,..��",�r,�.l �/ � f„ � � a�Gr � } awl1r,k��ii fi a +d' I Wi uu /i /irll��, J ��a� ��11�S�Nl li;1 I�iYl ➢%.'ii� J��,l i,1, � ��,,/4i".�I I�Yj�rFIP ,�,,� I/ � ,� ��//�.�'�,,!! l � r t / r .G. h� 1 ui i w �"I," �,r-�, ' .,, � ,J l // ,J �,;i//l�foi�J ��a.N'iWG•., if! r�e. V'.. r r awl �dG1Vr��ww �° V�,�w�soumu��w� Page D-114 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December T. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION ry Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Analysis of 2,000-ft Hold Down Procedure KeyWest InternationalAirport A screening analysis was conducted to determine how often EYW departures on Runway 09 were held down. FlightRadar24 trajectory data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021, were analyzed for three of the most frequently used, commercial aircraft types. The results are as follows: A319: Standard Profile: 90% Level Segment Profile: 10% E175: Standard Profile: 86% Level Segment Profile: 14% ATR46: Standard Profile: 91% Level Segment Profile: 9% 29 CIO A319 , ,Sta' ,g''e' , Le 1,11"I'1 ill ,ti i, 'A' 00, i�0' Oct.1. 2020, '' t. 202 W A E CST n a r Prcfi ,,,, , 1 u.kG a V w 1 yk' .9 W t as IN W ^F .., 0 ffffff -- °ti Val s I 1 ry:; 2 2,..51 3 4, 4,,.5 g, 30 Page D-115 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December T. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISIONE17age, e 1 , ................. Oct,.,l, 2 — Sept. 30 ,20,21,,", 5 GO ID i With AEDT Stan' ' all, r i s m' i ......... .......................................... w, ; oc i 31 O�:d u AT46, L n1 Ode 1- 2020 Ne"", 2 2 1 w� AEDT n a r z I ka � w A2 P' o { F w m , � y 10 Eks;t w l tl d�.:'ifp G,) 32 Page D-116 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December T. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION t, Noise Exposure Maps Update KeyWest Progress /Schedule International Airport • FlightRadar24 data for FY'21 has been purchased, and data has been processed for October 1, 2020,through September 30, 2021. • AEDT flight tracks have been developed using radar-based trajectory data from FR24. • Preliminary Fleet Mix, Runway Use, Day/Night Split have been developed • Awaiting FAA approval of Fleet Mix and Operations Methodology • Future Fleet Mix is being developed with input f rom Richard Strickland regarding known/anticipated changes in aircraft fleet. • Presenting Preliminary Aircraft & Airport Operations Data during the Ad- Hoc Committee Meeting on December 7th, 2021. Public Review&Comment on Preliminary AC& Airport Ops Data is scheduled for Dec 7th- Jan 10th 33 Noise Exposure Maps _10 Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest InternaLional.Airport • Development of the Existing Condition Noise Contours and Evaluation of Impacts is scheduled for completion by January 24th, 2022. • Development of Future Condition Noise Contours and Evaluation of Impacts is scheduled for completion by February 25th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 4, Existing Condition Noise Exposure is scheduled for completion by February 7th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 4 is scheduled for February 14th- March 18th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 5, Future Condition Noise Exposure is scheduled for completion by March 11th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 5 is scheduled for March 14th- April 15th, 2022. 34 Page D-117 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT December T 2021 SUBJECT TO REVISION t, Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest International Airport • Plan to present Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours (not Document Sections 4 & 5) to the Ad-Hoc Committee on March 1st for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours is scheduled for March 1st - April 4th • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 6 Updated Program Areas is scheduled for completion by April 1st, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 6 is scheduled for April 4th- May 6th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. 35 Noise Exposure Maps _10 Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest InternaLional.Airport • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. • Plan to present Draf t v3 NEM Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on June 7th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 is scheduled for June 7th- July 15th • Preparation of NEM Version 1 (all six sections and associated appendices) is scheduled for completion by July 1st, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v1 is scheduled for July 5th- August 5th, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v2 is scheduled for August 22nd- September 16th, 2022. 36 Page D-118 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December T. 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. 1.1" I" Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest InternationalAirport • Advertisement of Availability of NEM Document for Public Review is scheduled for the week of September 26th, 2022. • Plan to present NEM v3 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on October 4th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for October 1st- 31st, 2022. An electronic copy will be posted on the airport website. A hard copy will be available at the Key West library. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of Ad Hoc Committee meeting and public review and comment) is scheduled for completion by November 25th, 2022. • Plan to discuss NEM v3 with the Ad-Hoc Committee again on December 6th, 2022. Additional public review & comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for December 6th- 31st, 2022. • Preparation of NEM v4 for BOCC approval is scheduled for completion by December 31st, 2022. 37 Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest In i rpor • NEM v4 for the BOCC Agenda Package will be provided electronically by Tuesday, January 3rd, 2023. • BOCC Meeting Wednesday, January 18th, 2023. BOCC must approve submitting the NEM document to the FAA for formal review. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of BOCC meeting and additional public review and comment) and NEM v5 are scheduled for completion by February 3rd, 2023. • FAA Formal Review of NEM Document is scheduled for February 6th - May 5th, 2023. • Preparation of Grant Application for NIP based upon Updated NEMs is schedule for completion by May 31st, 2023. 38 Page D-119 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation December 7, 2021 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Rg .............. Public Participation KeyWest International Airport The airport operator must af ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 39 Page D-120 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KEG'VWEST The Flonds Keys Only Daily Aewv apex,Est 1876 PC 900 1800,Key ftst FL 33041 P-f30N 292-7777 exd 219 P(305)2e&802:5 legek@key-views com IONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 3491 S ROO EVE LT BL D KEY WEST FL 33040 � Amount 420155 Ticket: 3821816 STATE OF FLORIDA '��HER'S AFFIDAVIT NOIUCE OF PU13UC MIIRE!'I wG COUNTY OF MON RO E NOT]CE rS H E REBY 4 rVEN TO WHO M IT Rafted at Key west Flora th is 1 Sth MAY CONCERN Ray of November 2021, that a rnecti ng will be held of Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Richard Strirkland KEY WEST INTERMAnoNAE A ORT san for Dii ec r of Adrporrs AD-FOC COS MMME ON NOISE Key~Ints~r m6wal Airpon Vic-H fttEfl'L�� 3491 S-Roosevelt Blvd. who ors oath says that he or she is REGARD!NG THE U P DATE Of THE 49 Ke Welt FL 33 M CFR TITLE Ti PAT 1 is 11 1 Key West Citizen t%Q� NOISE EXPOSURE MAM of the Key Nest CAizen,s five day Monroe Count}wi II host a Pubi is newspaper published in Key West,in Monroe ou nty.Florida,that the attached Meeting on of a rtfsment,being Tuesday,December 7,20 1 at 2:00 p,m copy legal notice i n the matter of MEETING TI N 12.7 was at the published in said newspaper In the issues of; HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER 12DO Truman Avenue Saturday.November 20,2021 Upsrairt in the Commission Chambers Key Ykrt,Florin 33040 AND Afiant further says that t he Key West i ft'on is a news paper publ ished i n Key via a virtual mewed ng[correction at fit,in said Monroe County,Florida and that the said newspapers has hereto- fo re bee n co ntin u o us ly publ ished in sa id Monroe Co urlty, Florid a Tuesday th ru Persons i niefested in his issue are invit- Satu rd ay weekly,end has been entered as periodicals matter at the p(st of iioe in -ed to attend.persons WKhi ng to attend Key West,in said Monroe County,Florida,for a period of 1 year next pre ding ele nically can participate at h=sl th a first pu blication of the attached copy of sdvertisern ent;a nd a#Iia nt fu rther says 111'0cc-200m-u%61&2369QZZ2G9 TM paid nor promised a pu b�ic can also participate via i�ne that he or she has neither p p any person,firm o r corporation any (audio only)by dialing( )S i"805 dis unt.rebate,commission o u nd for the purpose of securing this advartise- and,when requested,enter the webi- r pu ti in the nespa pe r. na r I D9 823 6907 7969. The public is further advised that some or a of the nwrnbers of the Monroe County CommiOm Oe Commissiord ig natu re of Aff is nt �� Counol rn-embers andl-or their appo int- ed reV ntatim-of the incorporated cities of lviarath or%Key Color,Beach, A Ub bef r me lihi;5 1 day of Navcmber Z021 won and the Vila of isiamorada, repr ntati+ of the TauriIt Develop- ment Co until a rtd their area District Ad- visory Committee member may attend ( Iota P Ac ig na#u the meeting a ncl discus items that mad come before their respective tarn rr sions,Councils,or advi"Ards. Pursuant to Section 286,0105, Florida (Notary NA Printed Name) (Notary Seal) Statutes,notice is given that if a per- son decided to appeal any dec6m on L made by the Board v th respm to any Illy commission expires__. matter conWered at such hea ri ruffs or meetin�,he vd R nod a record of the proceedings and that, for such pur- posc he may need to ensure that e P u n elEy J�n rn Produced Ident ificatio n i verbatim rewrd of the proceedings is made,which record includes the teAi- many and evidence upw which the ap- Type of Identification Produ aDd peal►s to be bawl. AAA Assastan(e: Any i ndividtlel need- ing special accommodations at this meeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office. Sue� �� Stam at C305) 2-�141,Monday through Fri per day(exd ud ing holidays),betww n the A0MM U #m4 pacers of fiv a.m.and ar p Ys p and no �C later than five(5)cater p prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hear- i I inq or v*ioe impaired,call 1711 1 Page D-121 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm8 March 1 , 2022 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-122 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, March 15t,2022 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/j/89718550790 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 897 1855 0790. Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. October 5t"1 2021 2. December 7th1 2021 B. Discussion and Approval of Meeting Schedule for 2022 C. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Aircraft Operations development 2. Preliminary Noise Contour "Reveal" 3. Future Tasks 4. Public Participation D. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction Status 3. KWBTS Final Phase: "Buy American" Requirements 4. KWBTS - Final Phase: Bid Process 5. Rough Schedule for the Current and Future NIP E. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (S) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711' Page D-123 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 1st, 2022 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates Peter Horton Marlene Durazo Dr. Sandy Quillen Nathaniel Harris Nick Pontecorvo Dr. Julie Ann Floyd (via Zoom) Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML&A, Airport Noise Program Coordinator Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Peter Breen, FAA ADO (via Zoom) Kim Ledford, EYW ATCT Manager (via Zoom) Roberta DePiero, Homeowner Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the October 5th and December 7th, 2021 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Peter Horton made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Dr. Sandy Quillen seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Discussion and Approval of Meeting Schedule for 2022 Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments regarding the proposed schedule. None were mentioned. Peter Horton made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Marlene Durazo seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Noise Exposure Mops Update 1. Existing Condition Aircraft Operations Development Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 March 1,2022 Page D-124 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March Ist, 2022 Meeting Minutes Deborah explained the data that is needed to run the noise model. She then described the data available (and not available) from each of the four sources: OPSNET, TFMSC, FR24, and EYW Landing Reports. She reviewed the number of operations reported by the FAA in OPSNET for FY'21 that will be used for the existing condition NEM. She went on to explain how, following the discussion at the December meeting, she re-analyzed the FR24 data in an attempt to f ind the "missing" operations. She gave the following examples: a) Reviewed the criteria for identifying departures and arrivals and found many flights were being tagged as overflights because their flight tracks dropped off prior to reaching the runway or began after leaving the runway. b) Reviewed individual flight records and found many flights were missing data in the "equipment" field, and therefore weren't being counted. Looked up N-numbers and/or Call Signs to identify equipment type. Not all could be identif ied. c) Reviewed military operations to identify which were overf lights to NQX and which were using KWIA. Many were "low approaches" to KWIA. Also, many were helicopter operations. Deborah presented the revised results which accounted f or 93% of the operations reported by the FAA. She asked the committee if they felt this was satisfactory, and the committee informally agreed that it was. Kim Ledf ord, the new Manager of the EYW ATCT, conf irmed that the air traf f ic controllers at NAS KW handle aircraft between 9:00 pm (when the EYW ATCT closes) and 10:00 pm, and Miami Center handles aircraft between 10:00 pm (when the NAS ATCT closes) and 7:00 am (when EYW ATCT opens). She conf irmed that OPSNET includes nighttime IFR operations. Deborah reviewed the Day/Night Split (which changed a little), Runway Utilization, and Stage Length Distribution (neither of which changed). She presented the f inal numbers f or use of Back Taxi on Runway 09, and the Standing Takeof f procedure. Deborah presented the number of operations by category and aircraft type based on the re-analysis of the FR24 data. Kim Ledford provided clarification regarding types of helicopters operated by the military. She also commented that Delta operates CRJ aircraft f or their f final Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 March 1,2022 Page D-125 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 1st, 2022 Meeting Minutes arrival and those operations are not reflected in the presentation. Erick ULeon agreed that was true. Deborah indicated she would investigate the discrepancy. 2. Preliminary Contour "Reveal" Deborah presented a graphic showing the preliminary noise contours for the existing condition, and a graphic showing a comparison of these contours to the 2013 Existing Condition NEM. The new contours are somewhat smaller than the 2013 NEW She then presented a zoomed-in graphic showing the Program Area in the vicinity of Flagler Avenue that was approved for inclusion in the NIP based on the 2013 NEW The new Program Area may be based on the Existing Condition NEM or the Future Condition NEW so we need to wait and see what the new Future NEM looks like. 3. Future Tasks Deborah presented the current timeline for completion of the NEM Update, and highlighted opportunities for public input and opportunities for the public to review and provide comments on draft document sections. She indicated that the project was a little behind schedule, and that the f uture condition noise contours, and possibly document Sections 4 and 5, will be presented at the June meeting. 4. Public Participation Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must af f ord interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized the importance of the public's input since the FAA would be monitoring the level of public participation in the process. A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction Status 3. KWBTS Final Phase: "Buy American" Requirements 4. KWBTS Final Phase: Bid Process A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 March 1,2022 Page D-126 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 1st, 2022 Meeting Minutes Deborah presented a rough schedule for the current and f uture NIP, based on current information and the schedule for completion of the NEM Update. She presented two graphics showing the location of the ten single-family homes that had responded to an invitation to participate in the next phase of the NIP following completion of KWBTS. Seventeen homes were invited. The plan is to include these homes in the next grant application. Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • One call f rom KWBTS about toxic environment - noise and air pollution • Thirteen calls regarding aircraft noise at Las Salinas • Three calls/texts (from same person) about Trauma Star helicopter over Ramrod Key • Fifty-seven noisy aircraft reported by 2828 Staples Ave between Oct 9 and Feb 5 • One email about increased early-morning and late-night air traffic. Wants noise abatement windows. • One email about aircraft noise and flights over the Golf Course Community. • Two calls (f rom same person) on Seaside Dr. about being awakened by early-morning f lights 2. Airport Noise Report Articles f rom Volume 33, Nos. 42-44,and Volume 34, Nos. 1-6 were mentioned. Other Discussion The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:45 PM. The next meeting is June 7, 2022. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 March 1,2022 Page D-127 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION � I tionalk' irport Meetingof th Ad Hoc Commi"ttee on Noise Tuesday, 1 Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition KeyWest DATA NEEDED TO RUN THE MODEL In i rpor • Number of Operations by Aircraft Type (aka Fleet Mix) • Stage Length (Distance from EYW to Destination) • Time of Day • Runway Use • Flight Track Trajectory • Flight Track Use 2 Page D-128 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Existing Condition KeyWest FAA's OPSNET (aka ATADS) InternaflonalAirport Operations Network(aka Air Traffic Activity Data System) OPSN ET tells us the OPSN ET doesn't tell us: Number of Operations • Aircraft Type counted by the ATCT by: Origin and Destination • Air Carrier Time of Day • Air Taxi • Runway Use • General Aviation Flight Track Trajectory • Military Flight Track Use • IFR vs. VFR This is a human-powered system Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition KeyWest FAA's TFMSC InternaflonalAirport Traffic Flow Management System Counts TFMSC tells us the TFMSC doesn't tell us: aircraft that fly under IFR • Origin and Destination and are captured by the • Time of Day FAA's enroute computers: • Runway Use • Number of Operations by • Flight Track Trajectory Aircraft Type • Flight Track Use -1 This is an automated system . . 4 Page D-129 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Existing Condition KeyWest FlightRadar24 (FR24) InternationalAirport FR24 tells us: FR24 doesn't tell us: • Number of Operations Whether the flight is by Aircraft Type IFR or VFR • Origin and Destination • Time of DayThis is an automated system,, • • • Runway Use but the raw data requires • Flight Track Trajectory human analysis• • • • Flight Track Use interpretation 5 Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition KeyWest EYW Landing Reports InternationalAirport Landing Reports tells us: Landing Reports don't • Number of Operations tell us: by Aircraft Type for: • Origin and Destination • Commercial • Time of Day Passenger • Runway Use Operations • Flight Track Trajectory • Regular Cargo Flight Track Use Operations • GA or M I L Ops This is a human-powered sys:t:em:] • • 6 Page D-130 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Existing Condition KeyWest Aircraft Operations Reported by the FAA InternaflonalAirport October 1,2020-September 30,2021 Itinerant Local Total Air Air General Date Military Total Civil Military Total Operations Carrier Taxi Aviation Oct-20 1,035 395 2,138 21 3,589 180 5 185 3,774 Nov-20 1,218 466 1,960 17 3,661 95 4 99 3,760 Dec-20 1,596 517 2,734 31 4,878 202 11 213 5,091 Jan-21 1,809 620 3,207 45 5,681 222 14 236 5,917 Feb-21 1,592 659 3,356 32 5,639 206 1 207 5,846 Mar-21 2,229 774 3,730 61 6,794 254 8 262 7,056 Apr-21 2,258 768 3,361 22 6,409 248 10 258 6,667 May-21 2,286 633 3,556 44 6,519 412 18 430 6,949 Jun-21 2,254 525 2,544 41 5,364 292 6 298 5,662 Jul-21 2,097 504 2,381 20 5,002 128 2 130 51132 Aug-21 1,863 374 2,140 20 4,397 40 4 44 4,441 Sep-21 1,326 358 2,057 2 3,743 90 0 90 3,833 Total: 21,563 6,593 33,164 356 61,676 2,369 83 2,452 64,128 ATADS:Airport Operations:Standard Report From 10/2020 To 09/2021 1 Facility=EYW 7 Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition Key'West FlightRadar24 (FR24) InternaflonalAirport Reanalyzed As a result of the discussion at the December Ad-Hoc Committee meeting,the consultant reanalyzed the FR24 data in an attempt to find the"missing"operations. 1. Reviewed criteria for identifying departures and arrivals and found many flights were being tagged as overflights because their flight tracks dropped off prior to reaching the runway or began after leaving the runway. 2. Reviewed individual flight records and found many flights were missing data in the"equipment"field,and therefore weren't being counted. Looked up N- numbers and/or Call Signs to identify equipment type. Not all could be identified. 3. Reviewed military operations to identify which were overflights to NQX and which were using KWIA.Many were"low approaches"to KWIA.Also,many were helicopter operations. 8 Page D-131 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION � Departures and Arrivals m Tagged as Overf Iights Key,West lY, 1� r fi 9 FR24 Data Missing Equipment Key,West u Identified as 645022780 11015991 N620L N620L N620L EYW EYW Legend Kit Aircraft 645029926 11414012 EASY05 Beech UC-12W Huron 645044700 10799550 N4075W N4075W N4075W J3C-65 Piper Cub 645051265 10882566 N49CW N49CW N49CW Woody Pusher 645052902 10656133 N267FK N267FK N267FK Not Assigned 645074234 0 TRS1 EYW HST HST Military Aircraft 644876417 11117097 N72KW N72KW N72KW EYW Pitts S-2A 644888561 11113397 N716Q N716Q N716Q EYW Not Assigned 644897524 10829784 N43722 N43722 N43722 PIE EYW EYW L-39 Albatross 644921403 10631261 N242KQ N242KQ N242KQ EYW ISM ISM KODIAK 100 644922611 10816363 N424KQ N424KQ N424KQ EYW Not Assigned 644759654 0 N84X N84X EYW EYW Pitts S-2A 644760551 0 N075C Invalid N-number 644613929 0 N2AS N2AS TMB EYW EYW Beech B-60 644625587 0 N304659 N34659 EYW Stinson 10A 644625840 0 N49D N49D EYW EYW Beech 58 644466740 11236585 N8371U N8371U NS371U Piper PA-34 6444617451 10954961 N560VM N560VM N560VM WGO EYW EYW Cessna 560XL 6442492521 IRPA4893 IYX4893 I EMB 175 10 Page D-132 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Operations at NAS KW (NQX Key'West i i , r o J r J" r e J Y l ' �r 11 Map Update Exposure Noises Existing Condition KeyWest Developed from the Flightradar24 and FAA OPSNET Data, FAA TFMSC,and EYW Landing Reports i � � �' October 1,2020—September 30,2021 Air Air Taxi General Military Total Carrier Aviation Operations OPSNET 21,563 6,593 35,533 439 64,128 FR24 19,742 6,370 33,230 406 59,748 TFMSC 19,274 4,810 17,894 95 42,073 EYW LANDING 19,456 3,142 NA NA NA REPORTS Sources: FAA OPSNET,2021,FlightRadar24,2022, FAA TFMSC,2022,EYW Landing Reports,2022. ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 12 Page D-133 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Existing Condition KeyWest Developed from the Flightradar24 and FAA OPSNET Data Interniliport October 1,2020—September 30,2021 SOURCE AC/AT JET AC/AT PROP GA MILITARY TOTAL ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... FR24 19,736 6,367 33,204 396 59,703 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... OPSNET 21,563 6,593 35,533 439 64,128 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... %OF OPSNET 92% 97% 93% 90% 93% ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... TOTAL"MISSING" 1,827 226 2,329 43 4,425 "MISSING"PER DAY 5.0 0.6 6.4 0.1 12.1 Sources: FAA OPSNET,2021,FlightRadar24,2022 ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 13 Noise ExposureMaps i Day/Night Split KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 InternaflonalAirport October 1,2020—September 30,2021 Departures Arrivals Aircraft Category ......................................Daytime Nighttime Daytime Arrivals AC/AT JET 96% 4% 89% 11% AC/AT PROP 97% 3% 98% 2% GA JET 96% 4% 97% 3% GA PROP 95% 5% 97% 3% GA HELO 68% 32% 81% 19% MIL 98% 2% 93% 7% MIL HELO 88% 12% 57% 43% OVERALL 95% 5% 93% 7% Source:FlightRadar24,2022. DAY=07:00 AM THROUGH 9:59 PM NIGHT=10:00 PM THROUGH 06:59 AM ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 14 Page D-134 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1' 2O22 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Runway Utilization KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 Departure on Runway 09 Departures on Runway 27 Aircraft Category Daytime Nighttime Dayti e Nighttime Arrivals on Runway 09 Arrivals on Runway 27 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 15 Noise Exposure Maps Update Key,West Stage Length Distribution Aircraft Stage Length 1 Stage Length 2 Stage Length 3 Stage Length 4 Stage Length 5 Category Stage Length Distance(nm) ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 16 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION �. Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. Use of Back Taxi on Runway 09 KeyWest Calculated from FlightRadar24 InternationalAirport October 1,2020—September 30,2021 r n� r r G m,r f�r //%i r iyik��UIVI�III�W�6IUN)� Back Taxi to Use Full Runway Aircraft Category Depart From Taxiway B Intersection Length AC/AT JET 32% 68% AC/AT PROP 44% 56% GA JET 8% 92% Source:FlightRadar24,2022. ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 17 Noise ExposureMaps i Use of Standing Takeoff Procedure Key'West Based on Consultant's Field Observation InternationalAirport Runway Engine Average AEDT %of Total Use Heading Power Duration Annual Daily Aircraft Ops 09/27 Setting (Seconds) Operations Operations 737700 68% 88%/12% 900/270' 20,400 lbs. 15.0 81 0.22 A319-131 80% 88%/12% 900/270° 18,700 lbs. 1 15.0 1 2,897 1 7.94 CNA208 68% 88%/12% 900/2700 1,955 lbs. 1 15.0 442 1 0.01 CRJ 100% 88%/12% 900/2700 11,496 lbs. 15.0 4 1.69 DHC6 68% 88%/12% 900/2700 1,700 lbs. 15.0 618 1.70 DHC8 40% 88%/12% 900/2700 4,038 lbs. 15.0 619 1.21 EMB145 68% 88%/12% 90°/2700 6,375 lbs. 15.0 35 0.10 EMB170 45% 88%/12% 900/2700 11,730lbs. 15.0 765 2.10 EMB175 80% 88%/12% 900/2700 11,730lbs. 15.0 3,862 10.58 EMB190 40% 88%/12% 90'/270' 15,725 lbs. 15.0 183 0.50 Total 7,383 26.05 ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 18 Page D-136 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1' 2O22 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. AC/AT JET Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations Total Operations 21,563 59.1 RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 19 Noise Exposure Maps Update AC/AT PROP Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest AEDT Annual Average Actual Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations Total Operations 6,593 18.1 RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 20 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1' 2O22 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TOREVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. GA JET Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest Actual Aircraft Type nnual rage Aircraft Operations Daily Operations 0.5 RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Zl Noise Exposure Maps Update GA PROP Fleet Mix and Operations Key'West AEDT Annual Average Actual Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations AA5,BE19,BE23,BE24,STINSON,DRONE,GLIDER,BALLOON,PARACHUTE GASEPIF 109 0.3 Total Operations 21,674 59.4 - RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 22 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION ry No i se Exposu re Maps Update .............. Helicopter Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest InternationalAirport Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Daily Operations 1306,13407,13505 B206 142 0.4 B05,EC20,EC30,EC35,EC45 EC130 114 0.3 R22.1 R44.1 R66,EN48 R44 1,468 4.0 H60,UH60 S70 55 0.2 S76 S76 11764 4.8 ................................................................................................................................................................................AS50,AS65 SA355F 186 0.5 H535 S65 31 0.09 13212,UH1 B212 4 0.01 FAET,H500 MD60ON 14 0.04 A109,A139 A109 3 0.01 B429 B429 2 0.01 Total 3,785 10.37 �1'1-........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................I............................................................................................................. ...............................................................J RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 23 No i se Exposu re Maps Update MIL Fleet Mix and Operations KeyWest InternationalAirport Actual AEDT Annual Average Aircraft Type Aircraft Operations Operations erations C30J,C130, C130E 115 0.3 -38A 70 0.2 C2,MU2,UC45J DHC6 40 0.1 CN35 SF340 34 0.09 L39,MRF1 F5E 27 .....................................0'.'07 C17 19 0.05 UC35A C560 13 0.04 F15E20b.....................................................02 ,T6 GASEPV 15 0.04 .. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................DHC8 2......................................................................................................................................................................................DH8 0.01 F18AF 2 0.01 C37A GV 2 0.01 KC135R 2 0.01 DC3 1 0.01 0.01............................. Total Operations,, 351 0.96 RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 24 Page D-139 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION West 41 Ar 410, 4 ~ Y r f, w t Preliminary Contour Reveal" at the meeting 25 i a 1 Preliminary Contour "Reveal" Y, �'� ✓/,,." „r'n� "' ,%Jrli",, ;9p+"" r ai,,;V'»°^iii,rr'U�,,r,: ,�,.,r gl�'d,.v'^'!",°;u� d.. „;;xy�wns,,,,,, r[, �o i� x P ;��. l„ I,/), ��y�(r✓,�,xl,, rG.,:%;/rt, r�., �W�m`,;'�7, rNl (r'�+r,°luy,� ;.�„ ��%a. �o�:,. i �;;�0 ". �� ,9� lli w / 1 f t';,�I,. ,�r 1' '; ,,;. „� 7„,�.,.'', �r,,, ,�' ,,;,x Ir „',,v, �,`,, �, ,,,.➢,'�y �j;,>/ V� �, r �Vlot o » � ��aU,c, �,�rol �M1'�' ✓' �1 r,o w r{'r�� aJ'�i ,- I �� %'i H� ,VWr'"�+� au ;f {'" i ,�4�x i1�7, � jf,: 1✓��I�//� %i 'i ,.� 'Rpp 1W9 r v'll Owt�rvv Y� � 1, u i ,l��rri,aaryfniorrua rr,xxa�rm�jjlv..�wr�arr ,1 'J R /N�, ��{l;. iV ,,,;�,,,1/{@�>✓iy111N i$M°CPf%." s. � °rI� wlmww,�'kw� r ;vll,w000llw ,ro,�{/ ,� r ;,,�, r '.:I' 6, r(% ,;; ;,, �, ,raw^iwVlf ,,, ,, ,, ,,,�� ;'oii"' �i��;r�,� „}�✓��/ 1111,�1i1 VIM III I iwNmJr�,x, io „+' r rx i III °IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIV19m IV ti i i r / i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII / � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII f 1� Y I rl r �i I � ,i II IIIIII III I II fii I lu I,,;a uuuuulllll I.II { „ ...u�15,,� yl��YYIIIUI IIIIIII u'uuu 4 V iti u��uvw�t�`�I°�I�VVV VV uuul lyll �f„ IIII III �llllllllllll h��:�fllllll I �IIIIIIII �I I f� II RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 26 Page D-140 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION f Preliminar .. yContour Com arison '/ �� >Gr 1 11 lq to 2013 Noise ",�,�'";,'" ;�>��i;9�q, rr �1r+1�f!6 ,I ;��4��rf y ! �I ✓iD!,y,�Y,`r,,, r r�,. i,,rr"//r � ,�'�Irry / �� ,rr ,; �, 'r';.1J,; ,p„�lU.. � I �I J ""yet �' f1J'��IULV�r,e�, do"yr"lv�� >l„Fy'.�;,,J�� .,'➢ 1i� �. �i�'°r� � II,1 I Il 1 I..p r' I U�,, /rN,'�41 i8/f��n � ,' �Iqr w✓i ,,�r ;�qn�/� 1lJw , z III�IIII r y i m iV I I // a/ Id 'a r FAtl� V �/�y J; ur,; «id}ur�l,�vj��y;,a`rw,d'o "1 f��f`°�I�W,✓�eiYr I�'J�;H r �, )� �� y « v'D �f rlNf.�� i �rJr r f '�� r ➢ q �' '!ir I� � f f IJ rl IV5111 I I r it III °°I I I 4. V y � 1v' I I u ro cull I � r �I VI Vh IYII Gorr ,J r «r f 1 fr ri Is 1 I % l I11 �� IIIIIII �I i II II I I r , r � r 1 i I/ � I r/ / r / l f l I r IIVVIIIIIIIII IJIIIy��I I uduuuuuiuu °°°°°°°°� I it IIII 5 it RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 27 .................. 2013 Noise Exposure Map Approved ProgramArea i / „, ,,, -• fir 17, r I J .otbw, r �, v Ir P J mu mu 0f a WV f A101i�r�rr�� Ilullllll, �' yl fI i I f I ';fir Now, !r h r 1 / u�yYl / mails��y ,y � Yu �N�NIN j NNWr,� �r r ww 111190, b%W ' olrV r«f /iq Yrj`�7 1 o /�w%f�%,� ''✓/ � Nrr IkriuJm%�v�w»�«'w�,ygq'l f✓i'I fl��. !f µ„�Ni�w ;m� V 7 „rmnam,mrvw�mrrtra'J„ ,,..yvr 'W�lN r+mVlmlp�VaWu%WI f j" ryp /I(ll'fl'VMalb kl4 1 Fiau `A➢II,rvOI fun-"<d,41 Ir,� 1��,1e�,r y�r♦rY�uxrcYyY�"`4�;�w!�,�ar,.,r«,W„�«„irti�A« � ". a., rr ; I I Diuul�� u�,,mnwivll!)rrww""DwuXWDWvure''�" mtirrdtifi�lvw'";n�gdl 28 Page D-141 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 11 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. 1.1" I" Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest InternationalAirport • Plan to present Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours Cnot Document Sections 4 & 5) to the Ad-Hoc Committee on March 1st for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Preliminary Existing & Future Condition Noise Contours is scheduled for March 1st - April 4th • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 6 Updated Program Areas is scheduled for completion by April 1st, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 6 is scheduled for April 4th- May 6th, 2022. • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. 29 Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks /Schedule KeyWest In i rpor • Preparation of Draft v1 NEM Section 7, Consultation and Public Involvement is scheduled for completion by April 15th, 2022. • FAA and Airport review and comment on Draft v2 NEM Section 7 is scheduled for April 18th- May 20th, 2022. • Plan to present Draf t v3 NEM Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on June 7th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 is scheduled for June 7th-July 15th • Preparation of NEM Version 1 (all six sections and associated appendices) is scheduled for completion by July 11t, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v1 is scheduled for July 5th- August 5th, 2022. • Consultants, Airport Staff, and FAA review and comment on NEM v2 is scheduled for August 22nd- September 16th, 2022. 30 Page D-142 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. 1.1" I" Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest InternationalAirport • Advertisement of Availability of NEM Document for Public Review is scheduled for the week of September 26th, 2022. • Plan to present NEM v3 to the Ad-Hoc Committee on October 4th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for October 1st- 31st, 2022. An electronic copy will be posted on the airport website. A hard copy will be available at the Key West library. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of Ad Hoc Committee meeting and public review and comment) is scheduled for completion by November 25th, 2022. • Plan to discuss NEM v3 with the Ad-Hoc Committee again on December 6th, 2022. Additional public review & comment on NEM v3 is scheduled for December 6th- 31st, 2022. • Preparation of NEM v4 for BOCC approval is scheduled for completion by December 31st, 2022. 31 Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest In i rpor • NEM v4 for the BOCC Agenda Package will be provided electronically by Tuesday, January 3rd, 2023. • BOCC Meeting Wednesday, January 18th, 2023. BOCC must approve submitting the NEM document to the FAA for formal review. • Update of Section 7 Consultation and Public Involvement (to include documentation of BOCC meeting and additional public review and comment) and NEM v5 are scheduled for completion by February 3rd, 2023. • FAA Formal Review of NEM Document is scheduled for February 6th - May 5th, 2023. • Preparation of Grant Application for NIP based upon Updated NEMs is schedule for completion by May 31st, 2023. 32 Page D-143 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation March 1, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update Rg .............. Public Participation KeyWest International Airport The airport operator must af ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 33 Page D-144 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KEY 'WEST The Florida Keys Only Daily Newspaper,Est. 9876 PO Box 1800,Key West FL 33041 P.(305)292f-7777egals ext.2[s1pp,9/y��/F. wpW{�,p��0y5)29�5-8'025 MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 1 S ROOSEVELT KEY WEST FL 33040 Account: 420155 Ticket: 3833207 PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING the scheduled meeting;if you are hear- COUNTY OF I KON ROE ing or voice impaired,call"711 x. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT Dated at Key West,Florida this 15th MAY CONCERN Day of February,2022. Before the undersigned authority personal/ eared that a meeting will be held of Richard Strickland pp Senior Director of Airports KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Ke;West International Airportfc: �E AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOI 1 Si.Roosevelt Blvd. f kswho tan oath says that he or She is Key West,FL 33040 REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 49 2/16/22 KEY WEST CITIZEN CFR TITLE 14 PART ISO of the Key West Citizen,a five day NOISE EMSURE MAPS newspaper published in Key West,in Monroe County,Florida;that the attached Monroe county will hest a Public co of advertisment,being a legal notice in the matter of MEETING 3.1 was Meeting on copy '� '� Tuesday,March 1,2022 at 2:00 p.m. published in said newspaper in the issues of: at the HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER Wednesday,February 16,2022 1200 Truman Avenue Upstairs in the Commission Chambers Key West,Florida 33040 Afflant further says that the Key West Citizen is a newspaper published in Key AND West,in said Monroe County,Florida,and that the said newspapers has hereto- via a virtual meeting connection at fare been continuously published in said Monroe County,Florida Tuesday thru tt ps;1/mc _cc.z_oom.us6&9Z185 070 Saturday weekly,and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post office in Persons interested in this issue are invit- Key West,in said Monroe County,Florida,for a period of 1 year next preceding ed to attend.Persons wishing to attend the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and afhant further says electronically can participate at aid nor promised an �, y mcbocc.zoot0,,�(j/89718550790. The that he or she has neither p p y person,firm or corporation an public can also participate via phone discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertise- (audio only)by dialing(6416)518-9805 and,when requested,enter the Webi- m nt for p iat' in the 'd newspaper. nar ID#8971855 0790. 4 The public is further advised that some or,all of the members of the Monroe (Signature ofAffiant) county commission, the Commission/ Council members and/or their appoint- ed representatives of the incorporated A Irm d Is r' edil before me this 23rd day of'February 2022 cities of Marathon,Key Colony Beach, Layton and the Village of Islamorada, representatives of the Tourist Develop- ment council and their area District Ad- ('Q' a blici gnaltur visory committee member may attend the meeting and discuss items that may ''I come before their respective commis- sions,councils,or advisory boards. (I IC►tary ubi Printed Name) (Notary Seal) Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes,notice is given that if a per- son decided to appeal any decision My commission expires L�q� made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings,he will need a record of the proc eedings, and that, for such pur- PerSonally Known X Produced Identification pose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testi- Type of Identification Produced mony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. ADA Assistance. Any individual need- . % to ing special accommodations at this " %e nn Stamprmeeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office, at(305)292-4441,Monday through Fri- C%M=ON 1 W=2 day(excluding holidays),between the hours of 8:30 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.and no EVIRESS'JUne 27*2022 later than five(5)calendar days prior to lot WXW WU ftM Notary Gaiq i o ria iianaa�,iy�i,fie- �u��o.a,wwu a:�pm a mo00 i��a0"VW40m,o�wnw Page D-145 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Dm9 June 7, 2022 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-146 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West International Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, June 7t",2022 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/88670926506 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 886 7902 6506. Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. March 11t, 2022 B. Discussion Regarding NEM Update 1. Development of Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Ops 2. Preliminary Future Condition Noise Contour "Reveal" 3. Future Tasks / Schedule 4. Public Participation C. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction Status 3. KWBTS - Final Phase: Bid Process 4. FY'22 Brant - P50 8 Consultant Contract 5. Future Challenges for the NIP 6. Rough Schedule for the Current and Future NIP D. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports E. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Page D-147 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 7 t"1 2022 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:13 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates Peter Horton Andrea Haynes Nathaniel Harris Marlene Durazo (via Zoom) Dr. Julie Ann Floyd (via Zoom) Dr. Sandy Quillen (via Zoom) James Seadler (via Zoom) Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML&A, Airport Noise Program Coordinator Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick ULeon, Deputy Director of Airports Roberta DePiero, Homeowner Antonina Smirnov Homeowner David Langley, Homeowner (via Zoom) Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the March ist, 2022 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Peter Horton made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Nathaniel Harris seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Noise Exposure Maps Update 1. Development of Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Operations Deborah reviewed the number of operations reported by the FAA in their Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) for FY'28 that will be used for the future condition NEM. She went on to explain how the future fleet mix was determined, indicating that two airlines are planning to replace their A319 aircraft with A220- Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 June 7,2022 Page D-148 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 7 t"1 2022 Meeting Minutes 100 aircraft prior to 2028. All other aircraft types from the existing condition are expected to change prior to 2028. She explained the method she used to assign operations to the various categories (e.g., AC/AT Jet). The total number of annual operations to be modeled for 2028 is 69,196. Nathaniel Harris mentioned that a rumor was circulating at La Brisa that they would be included in the NP. Deborah indicated that was not the case, and asked Nat to assist insetting the record straight among residents of La Brisa. James Seadler questioned the use of operations from FY'21 for the existing condition and asked if a comparison had been made to more recent operations. Deborah explained that she had to "take a snapshot in time" to prepare the noise contours, and further explained the debate regarding use pre-pandemic operations vs operations during the pandemic. She explained that it was ultimately determined that operations from FY'21 would be the best for the existing condition. She went on to explain that Mr. Strickland provided data to the FAA to justify an increase in the FAA's TAF for EYW because air traffic at EYW was recovering from the pandemic very quickly. 2. Preliminary Future Condition Noise Contour "Reveal" Deborah presented a graphic showing the preliminary noise contours for the future condition, and graphics showing a comparison of these contours to the (1) 2022 Existing Condition NEM, (2) the 2018 Future Condition (from the previous NEM Update), and (3) the 2013 Existing Condition (from the previous NEM Update). The new contours are somewhat smaller than the contours from the previous NEM Update in certain areas. She explained that this was primarily because of the changes in the types of aircraft being use, rather than the number of operations. She then presented zoomed-in graphics showing the Proposed Program Area in the vicinity of Flagler Avenue and 4t" and 5t" Street. Finally, she presented a graphic showing the preliminary phasing plan, and explained her logic for the arrangement. David Langley asked Deborah to provide the slides containing the noise contours, and other agreed. Deborah indicated she would provide a copy of the final presentation to everyone following the meeting. Roberta DePiero asked about houses that had newer windows. Deborah explained that noise eligibility testing would be conducted to determine eligibility for the NIP,and it was possible houses with impact-rated windows might not qualify. That remains to be seen. Antonina Smirnov asked how people would know they were eligible for the NIP. Deborah explained that letters would be mailed to Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 June 7,2022 Page D-149 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 7 t"1 2022 Meeting Minutes potentially eligible property owners once the Program Areas was approved by the FAA. Peter Horton asked if any homes had ever been disqualified by the noise eligibility testing. Deborah explained that in the original NIP, eligibility testing was not required by the FAA. At KWBTS, all condos were qualified through the eligibility testing. The upcoming NIP will be the first time single-family homes would be subject to eligibility testing. 3. Future Tasks / Schedule Deborah presented the current timeline for completion of the NEM Update, and highlighted opportunities for public input and opportunities for the public to review and provide comments on draft document sections. She indicated that Draft NEM document would be made available for public review prior to the October meeting. She encouraged everyone to review the document and provide comments. Peter Horton stated that all comments must be submitted to the FAA. 4. Public Participation Finally, Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized the importance of the public's input since the FAA would be monitoring the level of public participation in the process. A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Recap 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction Status 3. KWBTS - Final Phase: Bid Process 4. FY'22 Grant - P50 8 Consultant Contract A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Deborah presented information regarding the City of Key West's "Substantial Improvement" regulations and explained why this could potentially be an issue for the upcoming single-family homes in the NIP. She explained that it will probably be Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 June 7,2022 Page D-150 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise June 7 t"1 2022 Meeting Minutes necessary to obtain private market value appraisals on all or most of the homes to document that the NIP improvements do not exceed the "50% Rule." Deborah presented the FAA's latest decision regarding inclusion of the "leftover" single-family homes, explaining that the FAA has decoded those home will not be funded until the NEM Update is complete. The FAA has also determined that the Scope of Work for NCP Update, which would give consideration to including Las Salinas and/or Ocean Walk in the NIP, cannot be reviewed and approved until the NEM Update is complete. This will not really impact the schedule for Las Salinas and/or Ocean Walk, since it will be several years before they could be included. Deborah presented a rough schedule for the current and future NIP, based on current information and the schedule for completion of the NEM Update. Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Six calls regarding aircraft noise at Las Salinas • Three calls/emails f rom La Brisa • Two calls from Cud joe Key regarding helicopter overflights • Numerous noisy aircraft reported by 2828 Staples Ave • One email regarding eligibility for the NIP - Patricia Ave • One email about helicopter f lying back-and-f orth over Riviera Canal 2. Airport Noise Report Articles f rom Volume 34, Nos. 7-19 were mentioned. Other Discussion Deborah shared information regarding the Quest for Quiet conference, "Aviation Noise, Pollution and Health: Connecting the Dots," to be held over Zoom on June 16. The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:50 PM. The next meeting is October 4, 2022. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 June 7,2022 Page D-151 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ili 'Key West � I tio inalk' Meetingof th Ad Hoc Commi"ttee on Noise Tuesday, 7th 12022 1 Noise ExposureMaps 011 bevelopment of the Future Condition Key'Weist Fleet Mix and Number of Ops nterMr,atiorua 1.Airpoor APO Terminal Area Forecast Summary Report Forecast Issued May 2021 2019 15,282 4,831 29,497 464 50,074 2,922 56 2,978 53,052 2020 12,951 4,793 24,349 350 42,443 2,394 92 2,486 44,929 2021 18,779 5,608 30,248 350 54,985 2,399 92 2,491 57,476 2022 20,657 6,561 30,373 350 57,941 2,404 92 2,496 60,437 2023 22,256 7,088 30,498 350 60,192 2,409 92 2,501 62,693 2024 23,887 7,618 30,623 350 62,478 2,414 92 2,506 64,984 2025 24,958 7,975 30,750,1 350 64,033 2,419 92 2,511 66,544 2026 25,654 8,216 30,876 350 65,096 2,424 92 2,516 67,612 2027 26,124 8,414 31,004 350 65,892 2,429 92 2,521 68,413 2028 26,553 8,635 31,131 350 661669 2,435 92 2,527 691196 40 2029 26,991 8,849 31,260 1 350 67,450 2,440 92 2,532 69,982 2030 27,401 9,038 31,388 350 68,177 2,445 92 2,537 70,714 2 Page D-152 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps bevelopment of the Future Condition Key,West Fleet Mix and Number of Ops '.nterriatio a o�rt Using the number of operations for AC/AT Jets in the Existing Condition(21,563),the percentage of operations by aircraft type was calculated. These percentages were then applied to the total number of air carrier operations shown in the FAA's APO TAF(26,553). INTERIM AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS mmincommimmmcs II 44.78% 33.58% 0% 15.77% 4.25% 1.10% 0.48% 0.03% 100% 11,891 8,917 0 4,188 1,129 293 126 8 26,553 ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p p Develo ment of the Future Condition KeyWes Fleet Mix and Number of Ops L internaioal irpor Analysis of EYW Landing Reports Oct.1,2020—Sept.30,2021 ', ! Iry II IIX IIX V'XI IIV II II4 IIII �IIII IIV Iln I � II4 IIII�IIX � II4 II4 � II4 Iln Ilu � II4 n "'' IIM IIM1 IIII IIM1 IIII Iln 'IIII Ilb II Envoy Air(aka AA 3470 73% EMB175 Delta Airlines 830 17% United Airlines 459 10% Envoy Air(aka AA 1637 51% A319 Delta Airlines 1492 46% IU llegiant Air 112 3% ATR42(DHC8) ilverAirways 1480 100% EMB170 nited Airlines 1267 100% CNA208 Mountain Air Cargo 453 100% SW3/SW4(DHC6) Ameriflight/Skyway 439 100% EMB190 JetBlue Airways 415 100% SF340 SilverAirways 69 100% EMB145 Envoy Air(aka AAL) 46 100% ATR76(DHC830) SilverAirways 22 100% ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page D-153 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p Development of the Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Ops � � i Between Oct. 1, 2020,and Sept. 30, 2021, Envoy Air (aka American Airlines), Delta Airlines,and Allegiant Air operated A319 aircraft at EYW. Delta Airlines conducted 46 percent of all A319 operations. JetBlue Airways conducted 100 percent of all EMB190 operations. Prior to 2028: • Delta Airlines plans to replace their A319 aircraft with A220-100 aircraft,so 46 percent of the A319 operations were converted to A220 operations. • JetBlue Airways plans to replace their EMB190 aircraft with A220- 300 Aircraft,so all EMB190 operations were converted to A220 operations • No other aircraft types from the Existing Condition are anticipated to change ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p Development of the Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Ops � � FINAL AC/AT JET FLEET MIX AND NUMBER OF OPERATIONS ==1=C2=====Cz 11,891 8,917 0 4,188 1,129 293 126 8 26,553 11,891 4,812 5,234 4,188 0 293 126 8 26,553 Note:A220 is substituted with 737700 in AEDT ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page D-154 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Ex osure Ma s Update p p r%%P<< Development of the Future Condition Fleet Mix and Number of Ops � � i SUMMARY OF 2028 FLIGHT OPERATIONS � nn oa on on on on AC/AT JET 26,553 72.75 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. AC/AT PROP 8,636 23.66 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................... GA PROP ITINERANT 18,038 49.42 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA PROP LOCAL 2,435 6.67 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA JET 9,599 26.30 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA HELO 3,493 9.57 ......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. MIL ITINERANT 262 0.72 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. M I L LOCAL 92 0.25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................... MIL HELO 88 0.24 TOTAL 691196 189.58 7 uK,ey West wy � f' val Airport i �r rrrfraol /lllffaiii/l r a, NI`, V 4V, IL J�' s PreliminaryCondition Contour "Reveal 8 Page D-155 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Preliminary 2028 Future Condition Contour d I I nte rn,ationa 1.Airp o�rt ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 1 rw r "Ag"(mdl nllufil ' IIIII +r�q"IINra II I J p 11 r� 11//✓,! esp D/ � .. �, ��'"P o �� uuum �,uuuuuuuuuVVYVIII m I000so m✓ r,,,,�o��p �,rl�r, I �i �h4- / r Y r eyr� «a f k 9m�wm'w*A"Min1pi'llllno rI�Vtmu,ml;�q,4kluuflrmr,wn"wFrar!;C`k:',kiIIIWrr�If wm ren ll;V% .r+�i,;,: N';hlrerw 1l"mmoksaw o W iL aWun lllu'mg 0 kwuw wnmm and a°Aru,lllr Land 'a m li 4'Ire awdPe l ne oti ii, %ml r ,;i W,4r 4tpy h"Wd"ro�aewaam Yeyn w"wlrla'mI�N'4a�u ILWValraab y;avwwna Aa:�aW NlWwyw�Long X,�N oa� um�mwulrmn�;uww'mu�G,�cf mrw�yam WMwwwGmy�l 1,, rMIX�IMIV 7"NJURR7�k Wm;IaY HD%�W'WY ido Atv ws ww ranvoy „<'R 'ra!af"rl"look,...Mwivbr x"ugmeRr ,-vrw W d r nw ll wahN''w,yyml' W mMa WNwR tl nr c u w �Fiqwffla Keeoi n'llw rN m.mNall uW k wwnhY,y9m"rrl d Paul w a p''Ifo INar f o�"ti,'a�A:M'R`i�HiVNN"aiVp lrl�!"�a"VUR�"svJkft/s "mUV'`",o"a*!'IVsdm,1 M""G"rralwt"uwlKrprw 0�IrPwvawm oy y p Y'rrPo W IIN." a<yml r� Hvw&n",Tagwlro 'KV c"W"n IV�NI�IIlpml4a�lmm.9 I�d..'rP,l"aN"rN�uWk N"IIw;"d'pIJ��W'ti�r' rrtw 17M MWdIttFWI$muin'� 40 i4t4uuhnda6w i 3 7dy Ird koy'wWakwanO R%rCAquilraJl.m y I iNren"'n-•t, D;,a cft3V..pk "W—B`"r, �wavun 9 P r e . . ngr 2028 Future Condition Compared to 2022 Existing Condition r I nte rn,ationa 1.Airp oirt ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE ":v, V��JIwl' �i Ort r�fiwTi"p,,, r� r i err 311A� r/ r s / r,/�'f�urrYJ bmw rI r pl rw r w'w/Irr yy ''� I�a��mf r gym: 1� �✓"' r /r�r 71��/l f a r�, N.�wml� m,mlm wj k�� '4w av�i �dln%� r ri r wwd � t %f/' y /, (�IIII�ma�VY!wPN:w lkuwamu, i rP p a r �l arrow �a' �v �I' r �la rjrff(/1 jri L� u� ors::.. i17 I�I r ✓�� rJ v y r � 1��/J`f%�p� �� Vd ..,,.. �„,,.;�.. ,,,„J.. l 1 i v �I ( r n I,�, II IIIII •.I II,� I' 1. r. P ��VVV�Ily"""��IIIIIIu IuuulYuuiil` u�mw,ll IIIIIII IIIII r I I d ( r I U J I 1� �II V f i(Illi Y '"4v 1 I h 7- A -I,IY11f7ti1( IIp iglu II�� mug°" �,!r� �/��V �II��Illull'I� lu�'I I Ill�l �lul'I i IkNw'wa'ae //j a./ J fil r tty�/ �,lu" ,a�rr I,�'r'Nllu�;,,.� ° w li Iltdldmwrml!tl�ro!wmw,w w"F�unl o9ir 1 I f�/l�r 'mar„rlra� IIW m��W�p�W�I��U + �ru�"a�m��y�Nnumu a N'wlu��w,�q,n�r'lua;�n rh'wryr�uM�wlwlmnal�I��Ncur Jpn //ri I y NV�R4fr fVatp rrf� �. II 1,-'IIIIIII 1 u�lr,�m'mmyr a � �� dnYbmlll�Ilrrry nw�rrvllr�r�r� f Ih 4Muorf gs Aom 4,w N I f r r A I I l u el I I U u "�m,m,lrv�wmfWlmym wy aa'wrmwr��rk y uuuuu � v Tall w ��'r�o�ih,W��hrwalm�N..Ilro^urtln'aywl °Nell I"�II Il,vmv � �wllnkym;'n�IG�r�^y�"s�k pp Wuu tlNltlwiruaw d�`Nxww9w'adWuYd,lmun Y&MlwVE LIMP, I,�l�VII V II IIVV��VVVVVVuuuuuuuuuuuuuu�l9 IyIIIIiyWp;k,PNYrI"eifl9N'VIIGu:'/;W"W1NIN'rrJPN" ,µw;yullJuxlr ra.0,n'vlwanurmllmw,s+;rw II i �°°°°°°°°°°°ouuuuuuu° 44, Y��r"p�lrlMIlalNh!I�• a�u,lv7fMumw�� mV"v49uNV � �:w�l�mgr5raW�IWrelMaulkfl�Wa�ru�lfir� �eall�rYll�ruwl�4u"Iu�N,f�r��"Vq's I'"Ir Ih y d llllll IIIII�I�II�� ryy�rruP�dN r alr Ilrwwcl I w4mfVk�srm'uIImI B LII v+�P"Ik(�"i I wa7nw, e % w l*v wuumrw"A d.'rNaij'mao m�,uwm r"1,11+''u'ylhu�m W U�rt L`'4N"N k`Ik ir�'yrM ld kas°mf�/M�'d 4aWh�rwR'umw iimlih�FVrlr4uatiu"W"Wa' "6'6aa.l¢+#; d . . ...rW. .....� riln."4 I,pdwwn�l Ya.mMm YI wp 4N r IIIIIII r ".u r IIIIII „.N-. I ,. '�WW,I�IXIfII.UB IW/ N� ,V.YWd W/dh IIIN.s m W .HO r. 40P 1'tlydulv4a19 rm"w,oilw,~;~,»rirm^fd,,4;W'°Wy lrii(algry ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHAN " 4lplWllhWlu"rr�NtiwiMf mkworMIIuWNf mr, d:w 140 rd.. 10 Page D-156 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION PrelimL"ngry 2028 Future Condition Compared W" to 2018 Future Condition NEM r I st I nte rn,ationa 1.Airp oirt ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE �:m I i� Iw 'l f rr�,rl� �"'./ri vilfr W//.�/rr,� �J,.. ��,,.r„r ✓,o',w;,,,�.,..,!„��.,-',,,�„�„'°,/u'r �,�W r.11. � M1:�u9'��iYN�� " �rI� � �YVV, u�i ry IW,�;rnv�l�YVI WaGx r br"r°/ ,-rw�r, lV�,r�»» "'Unlr 1 N�/ y/%r f�) ��w qe�IN�,aW.a✓v�rvu:w y III ➢a I I II rI I W, g e 11I IN / r f r� !i l��Jf a.u�ama^rrc I��mGulmv� �imau�> ma �1a!ri,mra�y��rJlvil.lvmwa��y!7ill��.�uu,�,� 4';rvplr+u�Alpa:lu4�rauua�o�ml Pre ab�l Furarr.aA,a Ndnall i i .ru,N w°Illy ll e;r :o; IN Ir � msvm w, f wr ��,� V u,aa u �frdmm�l^h¢AmM-rdV�uyunm��Irr.miN`Ip ,u,»mruua�z,c��'t<�a^wr9 I�agmeawW`•Irummwuad"+✓'��wmoi�!q RNA IPamauWu xflN, �dllal :�uadllrO# d malmm an MuIlit Pf w,aa w I uidulr k�n�l nro.l mn�rlau �� 1 ersQluua eaur,W,uW:.�ju,"Op"Favinh %�MYI�aN.�p"Huy�,,p1alll NIII�JaduV W"�1:'�hT I�;� (r�"I WWII%n,{lMV�k '(VIY'rou" Nw loekdn tlwn dv��¢+rrurzr rr. "p'i dnvvz mend d,'rdapawvau o rad Ha7-�a.wan lr II N�a uNo ' I6ruYaarfir?mNrnnnreJlH�i»�dulM:u�YlrrYnrva,ra;�"'r>„u�uV66M;:s IL."V'YIP UrltarrvWVutlffi „a lro i6�u LAn d a a r p,m rnru, r! v a da;'d welt on4(T"P mlurdMl: v ay a»I m u � r�M MYCkX�k',I� P:Y1plVy (nl V P. 4,b N IV..!..fl:F0.8�:, 4 ,4 d dr1W^V..�uRfawdm;narR:a�ek:�-"�"r,�,rllrvll'u�:;�r,nimPVy"Iwu�nmr+eV� , ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 11 . . P r e I ngry 2022 ExistingCondition Compared to 2013 Existing Condition NEM Key,Weist I nte rn,ationa 1.Airp oirt ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE ^,I i� � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII J/dr l� �r• i U r b� � nuulumm�mvllr.' idN��'°r'Y+a Y �yfd it a I VV� �r t� f r 'm' ° ullll f 1 9 � r �y ,��I �1 �� rl ��' F i��r�r�",� ,,,i II r��w)z ��I�� 4IYi r. 'V I bra ,,, Y��16rr• I;s WAS m Name,r Ili al"'nLr ICd��kIP¢,"'Er rdlm� ad�u�.lr�,mrpu�4a"rul�mn!mt „! orlh,K))mlrr i0j a�rr a QNK4 rr a cra mRre l n aw m �� I II IIVIuIVlill Ili �'n;ir(wY^?�IIL�^a�»14"dIWml,,�aaiufdtl�Ha�" Gmw aPmrm°ka,P 6fraflwpUr�,� II�w�yal „,//•; �I IIIII li Rat)m..umk �i�im W;ynVWr F adrYlV)Iti", �rw rrr7:m.G9r"�:v�dm�7'�nl''IF:K�n'dw.w r�uY�r I III 0WM'aa`k�:,4aalumd I k1llalYrWl�Nw I�re�%Iph� �9,m'a111f,a'f11�:rrINrd. ��aNrrma a raavarum , 40 W': @;ttl raYlr y e a+::Y: dv MY mr V ml a; r m,uw�ra,V<mu,a6nrM',.• ttal avr , �'��m,m:Yumaavmua��,�Ino�Y�s!a°aamv'wr�� a� flat omr�('mlm�alk°wdraw:ay�V ;Maw✓Nw9 rghNu. lal' Tawurrnkmu rcmm A,u"~^rWll ftu, �fu,,�;irR!o,�nwmV m��IrVm 5`�ul�algV x"�Ilwmmmuatl k:::: wad lh HllflaalmwN`lyd, m" kls,"w,�p traO,h.mumd Ma mwrkd oulr'ra l m�r dP u!fir'it C; b am�aw.uyd 'wrJl'ti�e�jnVfmga��n IN,.rwwaa w WIN'�wd" f I., nu,1 IINrv+'Sk�h'V'd,'I:'V ro H��p�UV�A4'�a�(VMbwY'&#W�:r:aMm'dll...3''i lwmJ,'a!iAtl:a a,r4�II:yI�m�MY&�If�:Af''d'4'all"al% Or+'h d� h,r"m"VVV"a,rta!l,w.. �lu"Id°��;4�'/l�k,. �f%fl""PiINVGIIP;"qua!lk4""ud"a'Y�YIa�°0a�,aJ'(ala�l r',i,��tl�Y t41rv'dflyV:'"�,Arri"••.. v�»,. q m 12 Page D-157 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Prelimingry Proposi�d Program Area Flagler Avenue Area d I st I nte rn,atiorua 1.Airp oirt ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE b c,rr qj ''.0 pr a �VI��,im;�dyil 1� i �^mow ra �➢�Y� (W v VI y 001 wiJ nw4ir Vw �,... �� I� i ry �, �yl� U R�";V f�a,�f � i��c�,'"g,uU of �, I,W�y� '",��1�J�/I'�➢� D,9. �r„ �, w v w Catholic p;arow,s,` �I�� p�� '�," Ir+d@7?� ,��a�u� ,,, �r.vi;� 1✓H^'-'/„fi � 1 V� vi � -l 1�;, J i °j��'i 5 i^"�x,,n,!, .°.r,vi /'V�i, ,f,Nu�<��,: "mronbq,. iF VE Ili..,,1i �'� Y/ ,✓V, ." y; ,r,,, «, �" A¢i u 7 rye.I�,a$✓)urn�w>a!uu�ail it u:Mf9u I� �,,adr�w��».� �/� �� ! I Future Canodian 9 4 II a balk V au Pbak w l'/// / j III �/ l � VI'4Si✓e�<70 O+ah,.Wisp mr u:anftlu,.,u ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE N bF v 13 Preliml'ngry PProgramPro osed Area 4thand 5thStreet Area Key'Weist ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE f V' ng c✓,a,✓ vur r�9 ,zmi uiq (q� 001r V N � o v r s fl h�e ' �tV ,gJ o s rc iau"P y/ %MI µ y Vw� rr � ia , Po�"r d t as v rc '� r W ryi q� 1� f a u Ruud i ppp� w V u�u^yam (' 1 � 4 � ionryuu(�fir✓%��J�� f�� ep, V P , ✓r/ / MA II inwk Hu!,Wfo 8 ti'r�n Qom ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE I 14 Page D-158 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Preliminary NIP Phasing Plan g„ y U u_. ✓,° "'w ,, �fi VN.N. as w.Nu fl fV r� "�✓��i tl�lr vn,m ;k.lV, N,�- ,%S,.UIG UDI I YJn d hA'Y&u0P[Ia n q' Program Phasing ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Aw"&usfiimmin:M r„t, p zo N� IMF, ✓(� i ,iN gal", V ^('u P � hi M✓ ".ii Pik .r '», ,., q w mom b f b „ �" u N iui�">'"l7taµ fry 0�w wr ^"h %r �I ,fV➢ �N �y� �k;,..�R w��" "� NY"F.,N „�W1 Kfi�9war fl �w p µ`, &, 6 ,. i�M Bins✓,,.° f�"tl'W un gr p �,qr"(Is w lr; ,,,y �rW'"' � e= �o 'V A^�✓ G,'q,;��. ,.,.V,�'., °JN� O(N, W�m.n V Vy; tl V L, 1"o d-u 6 * ��M a N kuY to „.V „" `f f ° l „„,v, u r „ti o �,,,,, ��N tl u tf ,. c.✓ma.., w 0�m,�., v� 111 µ r u Jt ��h.✓,�,��,��I',W r IN= �,✓or..-i r"WWi�t �„� V o��r,��V w!�""',ma�'�� ..��^+r w '"� �� IiY tl�u'�� tl,�d �.;,s�u✓�„„I� w�� "��° u��...rr,., p ,.,.�,;- ,. N'��umm± �,�,�,"� .yid y�fl�,�t '�!'�i�Yc B�b�Y 4fi �'. � �j,91', �i to �✓ ,."'��,�,y,ll. .n�rs''�`�a�N�y'�( Il i!� N �;'tln.»,�.� t w � w.�614 ✓�,A �� 1 � � "� � �i i � " o I��„ �r ;�� ",,.�. u�" ��a`Nd �V m!`MN r' r., r�� ,�� ✓ � f" °8 �y�o„„�f° �" �� ,�u ry �L� ,'=ire,� �p�� y ✓ w�- �} �° ��j��, �� ,��;�. W UI' w «I Vu q�µ ✓' P ul'ip'GanOMW �iui411�, �.� V `�'V d�i �� r�"""F V, ✓i r j r m �,,, ,. r ✓ rW��,�,'� ou 'Y,", hV a ,�r��W�4�b��V ��d lrf✓��ai� Vp �tlu,A,�Ur', n �,� �%�, �j/ ,�:; i/fir,%�/'� r�i ri/r'�%"': r;i� �, r.. +„v W '1v b:.iwua „m�w' r ., ,.. } �..�;.,.✓,,, /�/u �..,; i// ri ,,i l r/i%,%? ;,,�I�„,, v'tl II �0 n qq N I m.,,i,Fcn�� r��^'V � ✓k, Ih V �.�r �� ,,a,� � ��c��."✓�'G'J;.QU wb % , r, ' �;, „�,;, Ilb"I✓�Jf�;.�� ✓err ,�.�'Ib �0� r�°�r '� 6�:,,, ✓ '�d � ur !�f I 751014,144lulisyrCurfliamy �S' reµ 4 I r vows p ft lrb�9'ciry Prg V fit. 0sdf�'d'" � V V yg. if� ,�q I�rrrQ� '��G ��%✓, �,� �� ..w 1'�"-'r"4�p'.. u �y�, � i'µ�i ','s r,,, u ry �� ,µ V a vJ P1, r✓� u I �uo rr°•��jwt�J�i( V" f r. ,nn ✓ ,,.,. w 0111%'� ff� V NJ� V� �% fVrili II V Y, w`�;�du��rr ud gy 4 G ,,. our"9 ,�y✓Yliary;9tata f� V�Pv, �� a I 8 Y rA'q od J ' T�j ✓off�r�i6 iAN (�h V'll,'V ,� � a y,i O N u,d A "ww_Mm au �rd �q� l�u r vn lm °f 4WM °bNN a a�rrw r Wilk1 ..,YA A II 1 pl HIV . iar N+ °✓,M ✓,✓✓ '✓,✓ lil II�"V ,f4 4W; ) ` 6irN i� p q l mx u id4tl,, r�Any � ""' °V 'U N� '%r 'R ✓°�';"�0 ��,�,��1�'�, �� y ��!, �'i uJ�✓w ro ( � od y 1 p' 1 ,Vfi. u r r7r µ� Tf �r �� V IIII n au '��'✓�,'��'�,��"IV 4�M r� ��°W '"Yrir'11Y D ��ellh✓ w�x�+d^� ��✓ i v ,µ1.X� M;w✓ �� y ��,� fi '�n�a� tau �rrw✓ i �r�. � r•, i � I u i 1 I � 1 mm f� a I 1 i �i rt IN -r w i�� b� � ,,L ✓e��"�� Y�,II 1�,��.��„��,�;, Y�g,�°�Po��V�v,��„-✓�"""M a,�r y r ,;;,,. .,I .,:,�M�wJh,,,!,"i,,,, Y I ,✓� iu UV ^�w M��X9'T4lRµ ,�,�U ,xi, W f ryt, r o X yin! w,m, aft- N � �umVM,"�'"My'��"„�..'��ryr g ✓air r ✓y %' �. ✓� �� ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AIN ., '�✓1 flIXl. �b r'� 15 Noise Exposure Maps Update Future Tasks /Schedule Key'West InternationalAirport • All sections of the NEM document were submitted to the FAA by May 11th • Presenting Preliminary Future Condition Noise Contours to the Ad-Hoc Committee on June 7th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on Preliminary Future Condition Noise Contours is scheduled for June 7th -July 15th • Advertisement of Availability of NEM Document for Public Review is scheduled for the week of September 26th, 2022. • Plan to present NEM Document to the Ad-Hoc Committee on October 4th for public review and comment. Public Review & Comment on NEM Document is scheduled for October 1st- 31st, 2022. An electronic copy will be posted on the airport website. A hard copy will be available at the Key West library. 16 Page D-159 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation June T 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Noise Exposure Maps Update .............. 1.1" I" Future Tasks / Schedule KeyWest InternationalAirport • Plan to discuss NEM with the Ad-Hoc Committee again on December 6th, 2022. Additional public review & comment on NEM Document is scheduled for December 6th- 31St, 2022. • BOCC Meeting Wednesday, January 18th, 2023. BOCC must approve submitting the NEM document to the FAA for formal review. • FAA Formal Review of NEM Document is scheduled for February 6th - May 5th, 2023. • FAA Acceptance of NEM Document is anticipated by May 31, 2023. • Preparation of Grant Application for NIP based upon Updated NEMs is scheduled for completion by May 31St, 2023. 17 Noise ExposureMaps Update Public Participation KeyWest InternationalAirport The airport operator must of ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 18 Page D-160 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Proof SUBJECT TO REVISION NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE E I HEREBY GIVEN T WHOM IT 0 C S G 0 0 MAY CONCERN that a meeting will be held of Key West Citizen-Florida Free Press-Paradise KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AD-HOC COMMITTEE ON NOISE Date: June 01, 2022 REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 49 CFR TITLE 14 PART 150 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Monroe County will host a Public Meeting on - LEGAL AD PROOF — Tuesday,June 7,2022 at 2:00 p.m. at the HARVEY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1200 Truman Avenue Upstairs in the Commission Chambers Key West,Florida 33040 Thank you for advertising with us! This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on AND the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact via a virtual meeting connection at Melinda Prescott email to legals@keysnews.com https:Hmcbocc.zoom.us/j/88670926506 Persons interested in this issue are invit- ed to attend.Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https:H mcbocc.zoom.us/j/88670926506. The CUSTOMER INFORMATION public can also participate via phone (audio only)by dialing(646) 518-9805 and,when requested,enter the Webi- Account#: 420155 nar ID#897 1855 6506. Company Name: MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS The public is further advised that some Address: 3491 S ROOSEVELT BLVD or all of the members of the Monroe County Commission, the Commission/ KEY WEST FL 33040 Council members and/or their appoint- Telephone: (305)809-5239 ed representatives of the incorporated cities of Marathon, Key Colony Beach, Email: leto-beth@monroecounty-fl.gov Layton and the Village of Islamorada, representatives of the Tourist Develop- ment Council and their area District Ad- visory Committee member may attend the meeting and discuss items that may come before their respective commis- sions,councils,or advisory boards. AD INFORMATION Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, notice is given that if a per- Ad ID: 3849545 son decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any Run Dates: 06/03/22 to 06/08/22 matter considered at such hearings or #of Inserts: 2 Account Rep: Sue Stamper meetings,he will need a record of the # als ke snews.com proceedings, and that, for such pur- of Lines: 82 Email: le g @ y pose, he may need to ensure that a Ad Class: 26 verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the ap- Total Cost: $196.99 peal is to be based. Ordered By: ADA Assistance: Any individual need- Description: COMMITTEE ON NOISE ing special accommodations at this meeting,due to a disability,should con- tact the County Administrator's Office, at(305)292-4441,Monday through Fri- Publications Start Date End Date #of Insertions day(excluding holidays), between the hours of 8:30 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.and no Key West Citizen 06/03/22 06/03/22 1 later than five(5)calendar days prior to Florida Keys Free Press 06/08/22 06/08/22 1 the scheduled meeting;if you are hear- ing or voice impaired,call"711". Dated at Key West,Florida this 31st Day of May,2022. Richard Strickland Senior Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd. Key West,FL 33040 6/3/22 KEY WEST CITIZEN Page D-161 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION DolO October 4, 2022 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page D-162 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Key West Internntionnl Airport Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, October 4t",2022 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center and via Zoom Persons wishing to attend electronically can participate at https://mcbocc.zoom.us/,i/87124696382 You can also participate via phone (audio only) by dialing (646) 518-9805 and, when requested, enter the Webinar ID: 8712469 6382. Roll Call and Attendee Sign In A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. June 7th1 2022 B. Public Review of Draft NEM and Supporting Documentation 1. Public Review: September 19 - October 31, 2022 2. Document Availability 3. Submitting Comments C. Review of Draft NEM and Supporting Documentation 1. Flight Tracks 2. Existing Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix 3. Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months of Operations and Fleet Mix 4. Airport Operator's Certification 5. 2022 Existing Condition NEM 6. Number of Housing Units within 2022 Noise Contours 7. Future Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix 8. 2028 Future Condition NEM 9. Number of Housing Units within 2028 Noise Contours 10.Changes between 2022 and 2028 ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "71l". Page D-163 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Ad Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 Page 2 of 2 D. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. FY'22 Grant 2. KWBTS Project Recap 3. KWBTS - Final Phase Construction 4. Rough Schedule for the Current and Future NIP E. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports F. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE:If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting;if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "71l". Page D-164 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes Meeting culled to order by Deborah Lagos at 2:01 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Craig Cates (via Zoom) Peter Horton Andrea Haynes Sonny Knowles Nathaniel Harris Marlene Durazo (via Zoom) Dr. Sandy Quillen James Seadler (via Zoom) Staff and Guests in Attendance: Deborah Lagos, DML&A, Airport Noise Program Coordinator (via Zoom) Steve Vecchi, THC, NIP Program Manager (via Zoom) Erick D'Leon, Deputy Director of Airports Peter M. Green, FAA (via Zoom) Sarah Richardson, Allegiant Air (via Zoom) Carol Elliott, Las Salinas Property Owner Steve Robbins, Property Owner (via Zoom) Carolyn Winters, Las Salinas Property Owner (via Zoom) Linda Badwey, Las Salinas Property Owner (via Zoom) Ray Leto, Las Salinas Property Owner (via Zoom) Lynn Obringer, Las Salinas Property Owner (via Zoom) Elizabeth Brady, Las Salinas Property Owner (via Zoom) 55, (via Zoom) Scott, (via Zoom) Ian, (via Zoom) Rick, (via Zoom) Ruslan, (via Zoom) Jethon Williams II, Monroe County TV/Multimedia Manager A quorum was present. Deborah Lagos chaired the meeting. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6 October 41 2022 Page D-165 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the June 7th, 2022 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Deborah Lagos asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes. None were mentioned. Nathaniel Harris made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Marlene Durazo seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Review of Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation Deborah Lagos explained that a Notice of Availability was published in Key West Citizen and keysnews.com. The document is available for download from the Airport's website at: https://eyw.com/public-notices. Printed copies of the document are available at the public library on Fleming Street, airport administrative office, and office of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates. Flash drives containing the document are also available at these locations and can be taken for viewing on a personal computer. The flash drives do not need to be returned. The public review period started September 19 and ends October 20, 2022. Comment forms are available online and at the locations mentioned above. Completed comment forms should be emailed to Deborah Lagos. Comment forms must be received by October 20, 2022. Deborah reviewed the public participation requirements that the airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations She emphasized the importance of the public's input since the FAA would be monitoring the level of public participation in the process. Review of Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation 1. Flight Tracks Deborah Lagos explained the East Flow (Runway 09) and West Flow (Runway 27) flight tracks (shown in Slides #10 - #13) that were developed from the FlightRadar24 flight trajectory data. Twelve months of data (October 1, 2020 - September 30, 2021) were collected and processed to determine these flight tracks and their utilization by various categories of aircraft. Modeled flight tracks do not represent the precise paths flown by all aircraft utilizing EYW. Instead, they represent the primary flight corridors (i.e., the highest concentration of FR24 aircraft flight trajectories) for the aircraft using the airport. Flight track utilization was also developed from the concentration of FR24 aircraft flight trajectories. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 October 41 2022 Page D-166 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes 2. Existing Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix The percentage of operations for each aircraft in each category was calculated from the FR24 data. This percentage by aircraft type was then applied to the total number of operations by category from the FAA's OPSNET data. The table in Slide #14 shows the resulting number of annual flight operations by aircraft category. It also shows the number of average daily operations, which is the number of annual operations divided by 365. 3. Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months of Operations and Fleet Mix A question was asked at the June meeting regarding the use of more recent data f or the existing condition. Deborah explained that she analyzed data f rom August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022 (which was the most recent available data from the FAA). The table in Slide #15 shows a comparison between the data used for the existing condition (Oct 2020 - Sept 2021) and the most recent 12 months (Aug 2021 through July 2022). Surprisingly, there were approximately 4% fewer operations during the most recent 12 months. Deborah also compared the commercial passenger aircraft fleet mix for the two time periods. Slide #16 shows a comparison of the fleet mix by aircraft type. As discussed in previous meetings, Delta and JetBlue are replacing their A319s with A220s, and that is beginning to show up in this data. There was a large decrease in the number of EMB175s. Deborah explained the use of the FAA's Area Equivalent Method (AEM) which allows a comparison of two scenarios to determine if a significant change in noise has occurred. The results of the screening process indicate a 13.8% reduction in cumulative noise contour area. If the screening process shows less than a 17% change, it may be concluded that there are no substantial changes within the DNL 65 dB contour. James Seadler commented that this analysis was helpful in addressing the question he asked at the June meeting. 4. Airport Operator's Certification The results of the screening process allow the airport operator (Monroe County) to certify that the 2022 Existing Condition NEM is representative of the existing condition at the time the NEM document is submitted to the FAA for review. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6 October 4,2022 Page D-167 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes 5. 2022 Existing Condition NEM Deborah reviewed the 2022 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map, pointing out areas that were within the [)NL 65 dB contour. 6. Number of Housing Units within 2022 Noise Contours Deborah noted that most of the Ocean Walk Apartments and a very small portion of Las Salinas Condominiums were within the contours (approximately 249 units). She also pointed out the Grace Lutheran Church and School and approximately 48 single-family (and small multi-family) homes that had not previously participated in the NIP. There are 12 condominiums at KWBTS within the contour that did not participate in the NIP. 7. Future Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix Deborah reviewed the number of operations that were used for development of the future condition contours. The total number of annual operations is 69,196, which is an increase from the 641128 used for the existing condition. Peter Horton commented that historically, the FAA's forecast has been low. 8. 2028 Future Condition NEM Deborah reviewed the 2028 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map, pointing out that it was slightly larger than the existing condition. 9. Number of Housing Units within 2028 Noise Contours Deborah noted that most of the Ocean Walk Apartments and a slightly larger portion of Las Salinas Condominiums were within the contours (approximately 281 units). She also pointed out the Grace Lutheran Church and School and approximately 55 single-family (and small multi-family) homes that had not previously participated in the NIP. There are 21 condominiums at KWBTS within the contour that did not participate in the NIP. 10.Changes between 2022 and 2028 Deborah presented tabular and graphic comparisons of the 2022 and 2028 NEMs. The area within the 2028 Future Condition noise contours increased in size by 29.9 acres or approximately 6.6%. This increase can be attributed to the increase in aircraft operations. Contours shifted to the west, which can be attributed to the relocation of Taxiway B to the end of the pavement. As a result, all aircraft departing on Runway 09 begin their takeoff roll at the end Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6 October 4,2022 Page D-168 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes of the pavement. The total housing units and population within the DNL 65 dB noise contour increases by approximately 23 percent. 11. Remaining Steps Section 6.5 of the NEM Document will be updated to ref lect comments received during the public comment period. Copies of all comments will be included in Appendix E, Section EA of the NEM Document. A revised draft document will be provided to the BOCC for review and approval at their meeting on December 7, 2022. The final draft document will be submitted to the FAA following the BOCC meeting. The FAA will acknowledge receipt of the document and indicate whether in compliance with applicable requirements. If so, the FAA will publish a Notice of Compliance in the Federal Register. A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Nathaniel Harris made a motion to approve the NEM document and sending the NEM document to the BOCC. Peter Horton seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. NIP Implementation Steve Vecchi presented a Power Point Slide Show, including the following topics: 1. KWBTS Project Recap, including a summary of the FY'22-23 grant 2. KWBTS Building A - Phase 2: Construction Summary, including Property Owner Satisf action Surveys 3. KWBTS - Final Phase: Construction Preview, including results of the bid opening and the construction schedule 4. Rough Schedules for the Current and Future NIP, including changes in funding levels A copy of the presentation was included in the Agenda Package. Deborah described the FAA's latest decision regarding inclusion of Las Salinas and Ocean Walk Apartments in the NIP. The FAA has determined that an NCP Update is required but will not fund the NCP Update right now. This will not really impact the schedule for Las Salinas and/or Ocean Walk, since it will be several years before they could be included. The FAA is requiring NEM updates every five years. The Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 October 4,2022 Page D-169 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise October 4'. 2022 Meeting Minutes next NEM Update will start in approximately 2027, and be completed in 2028, which is the year on this Future Condition NEM. It is likely that the NCP update will be funded in conjunction with an NEM update in approximately ten years (2032). Other Reports 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log Deborah indicated that since the previous Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting the following calls and emails were received: • Three calls from Las Salinas - early morning and late-night noise • Two calls from Old Town - increased flight activity • One call from local realtor interested in getting the facts regarding houses that have participated in the NIP. 2. Airport Noise Report Articles from Volume 34, Nos. 20-31 were mentioned. Other Discussion The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:50 PM. The next meeting is December 6, 2022. Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 October 4,2022 Page D-170 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation October 4, 2022 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION 21 Owl' Of K, ey We.st i a tl / International Meetingof th Ad Hoc Comml*ttee on Noise Tuesday, 4th 12022 1 w Public Review of [)raf t Noise Exposure Maps KeyWest and Supporting Documentation International Airport 1. Notice of Availability was published in Key West Citizen and news.co m. Copies are available at this meeting. 2. Public Review: September 19 - October 20, 2022. 3. Document is available for download from the Airport's website at: htt„ : u li �n ti 4. Printed copies of the document are available at: a) Public Library on Fleming Street b) Airport Administrative Office c) Of f ice of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates 2 Page D-171 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 4 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION w r Public Review of Draft Noise Exposure Maps , G Key and SupportingDocumentation rnatdo r 5. Flash drives containing the document and comment form are available at this meeting, and at the Library, Airport Admin, and Office of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates. 6. Comments must be received by October 20, 2022. 7. If you fill out a comment form at this meeting, please hand it in while you're here, or email to Deborah. 8. Comments can also be emailed or mailed - see addresses in Notice of Availability. 3 Noise Exposure Maps "I'll......,...... and Supporting KeyWest Public Participation International Airport The airport operator must of ford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. 4 Page D-172 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 4. 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION Review of braft Noise Exposure Maps Key,West and Supporting Documentation h1ternational Airport 1. Flight Tracks 2. Existing Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix 3. Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months of Operations and Fleet Mix 4. Airport Operator's Certification 5. 2022 Existing Condition NEM 6. Number of Housing Units within 2022 Noise Contours 7. Future Condition Number of Operations and Fleet Mix 8. 2028 Future Condition NEM 9. Number of Housing Units within 2028 Noise Contours 10.Changes between 2022 and 2028 5 ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IM, ................................ SRI, 1P LE13ENII East Flow Fl ight Tracks �Vgh I 71-h cft,� cAnsm ed ILand Uaa out to at least 30 000 feet .PIT, Lan� f rom the end of each runway 6 Page D-173 Ad Hoc Committ ORAFTDOCUPWENTeePresentaticn October 4` 2O22 SUBJECT TOREVISION ' .. . ........ 41 .......... LEGEHD 'No Arrivall Flight TracR Open,Space Departu re Flight Track m? RecrealboiraiJ Areas IMF AgriWhval Unclassified de lindustnall Vacant Mining,Petroleum,and Gas Land ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE LEGEND West Flow Flight Tracks . .... out to at least 30000 f eet oc Ajr%,,t—� T�,.-�L.dQ',,,g f rom the end of each runway East Flow Flight Tracks PogeO-174 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 4 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION West Flow Flight TracksI I Ilu fr �.r;;.. �rf"i !!„a �fI„�V4l.W W^„��%! %/,,!a��/�� ,IIV„fir wJ�,'��A ,,,/1 y,,,,�. I 7y�•.v t.,,A '; v✓ °� �l�a..�II �r„///i� 1WrG� W III I J' � s v VV'i '� ;Y, >I t* fir• �✓_�'I f�:%' ��J �///� t � �f 7 fif �� f l f�+l o� n "I u(f l lll' I /V",�ir; l �., ,,,�. �,..-Y� •,„y' „� ;;///��r, � �°7"7 ,�% 1 I, ,;. „�rr'"�r/�!�F'��.r h m�.��r��,h4(�r i`hYYryi XU 1er�.�rm, n'}n� y�uu IIII II"'�'I IIIIIII " �� I I IIIIIIIIIIII'll a } �y p !,,,.r ,!%j �')W. r %'; ,, n k%/%�I/I/� xa I I:w l'r'm W!(l�c✓;.,I�I ,ha rn a J.,:, I°` rf 'v ; r Pr;a„r=��6�J111%%l}, ��" ��o��tlu�IM'➢ww I ,,,, is ,;w,�r,,/�� 9J�t r s Y ql !4�, I�", �� - o r' of I I r Y Ir li I r I r y r o 1 a �,,�,,,� r/��/I J✓rry�N,. v.:"ir.{,,,.,l`,','P'*4r r1 i�;y r I :' 7,,,, ,, �:.,".. ��IJJHir//,r, 1 W it��l`,,}I�'I �� W!s! �,: /.� �..; Ji' rr W/,Wr/�� r ufwfV ."!v ' -�„/fir/%/i/' ✓�1 e, kn1"U< 4 N N'µ H a/ � .. 'I a'4,d�'il""AVr'•F, iVUu�u Wi III II } I.I, }I II } � l N I � N Ih 1 Y N� I I II r m II r,Ir u,�F n� rblai�r+''"!�"a�"rl o.'�il/err M,,r41�//r)1 ,,...%��,la ✓aGl! ,,,,,, r --raw.''„ ,�'^' / �d ��'� t">k ,��"Ir�wrr rW✓��ir "�,,"'�l"�1� �!i; r��,,,;�//�� rr �' ,f'ew! /I rt "✓r y mrv�'�N aJ+ !� r� yiWji� � %e' /l/ � / LEGEND F/00/0 'reM Arn,lwral Flight Track Open S ace Departure FIliglntTrach, F{'ecreatoln-all'Areas SIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE [3 EYW Boundary Residerataal—Single"Family CVIt of Key"palest Boundary l esidentta;l—MoNle IHornes. Y a� y Monroe County Boundary Fi'esederntlrvat—Multi Fafrnut'. Generalized Land Use YRan,re�ela9 Lrsdguln WIR Agricultural Unclassified I� � uNU�IIu Undustlria� "lacarn:l: % Af I,u:amirnervall ffice Wins ng,IPetro eu!sa and Gas Land rplY lrw��a t>m»�d Wu u�9" y la wraWw,wrUMsrmzw�;mW�wu °a�rvk! "v�ow�^�, -' tau 9 Existing Condition Number oOperations bf Y Category h1ternatijonal Airport SUMMARY OF 2021 FLIGHT OPERATIONS IIII IW IIII IIII IIII Ilu iiii oo� 4u �� Iw iiii oo� Uw AC/AT J ET 21,563 59.08 AC/AT PROP 6,593 18.06 GA PROP ITINERANT 19,305 52.89 GA PROP LOCAL 2,369 6.49 GA JET 10,161 27.84 GA HELO 3,698 10.13 MIL ITINERANT 268 0.73 M I L LOCAL 83 0.23 MIL HELO 88 0.24 TOTAL 64,128 175.69 ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 10 Page D-175 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 4, 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION w Existing Condition Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months Key West Number of Operations International Airport COMPARISON OF NUMBER OF OPERATIONS M11�11E�El�lls ... r�..a�� 8�, �� 8!P�....1 �e, ', Oct 2020—Sept 2021 61,676 21452 641128 Aug 2021—July 2022 60,197 1,238 61,435 Difference -11 -1121 -2,,693 Percentage Difference .4 ANALYSIS 11 w Existing Condition "I'll............ Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months KeyWest Fleet Mix International Airport COMPARISON OF FLEET MIX ..................... .................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................--w--w--w--w--w--w-- Actual A220- EMB EMB EMB EMB AC 300 A319 ATR42 ATR76 CRJ700 145 170 175 190 SF340 -w--w--w--w--w--w -w--w--w--w--w--w -w--w--w--w--w-- --w--w--w--w--w- w--w--w--w--w--w --w--w--w--w--w- -w--w--w--w--w--w -w--w--w--w--w--w -w--w--w--w--w--w w--w--w--w--w--w w--w--w--w--w--w Total AEDT DHC CRJ9- EMB EMB EMB EMB AC 737700 A319 DHC8 830 ER 145 170 175 190 SF340 ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... ................................................................................................................................... ..................... 10/20- 0 3,241 1,480 22 0 46 1,267 4,759 415 69 11,299 9/21 8/21 55 4,175 1,506 18 153 0 1,273 2,555 444 3 10,182 7/22 .......................................... ..................... ................................................................ .......................................... ........................................... .................... ..................... Diff 55 934 26 -4 153 -46 6 -2,204 29 -66 -1,117 Diff 100% 28.8% 1.8% -18.2% 100% -100% 0.5% -46.3% 7% -96.6% -9.9% ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 12 Page D-176 Ad Hoc Committee Presentation DRAFT DOCUMENT October 4 2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION w xi i Condition E st n 9 uF, Comparison to Most Recent 12 Months Key West FAA's Area I Equivalent Method (AEM) International Airport • Calculates changes in noise using the algorithms in AEDT • Is a mathematical procedure that provides an estimated change in noise contour area for an airport given the types of aircraft and number of operations for each aircraft • Is used to develop insight into the potential increase or decrease of noise resulting from a change in aircraft operations • A 17%change in cumulative noise contour area translates into a one-decibel change in the airport noise • Used when the analysis can assume similar runway and flight track utilization between the base case and the alternative case • If the screening process shows less than a 17%change,it may be concluded that there are no substantial changes within the DNL 65 dB contour • RESULT:13.8%reduction ANALYSIS 13 2022 Existing Condition NEM Air ort O erator's Certificationp p Key'West h1ternational Airport Because the data used to develop the existing condition noise contours does not match the year that will be on the airport operator's planned NEM submittal letter to the FAA(2022),the airport operator must verify in writing that data in the documentation are representative of the existing condition as of the date of submission. Data for the most recent 12-month period of operations at EYW were examined and support the airport operator's certification that the FFY 2021 data is representative of the year on the airport operator's planned NEM submittal letter (2022). The analysis of recent data shows there has not been a substantial change in aircraft activity. The yearly day-night average sound level contours depicted on the 2022 NEM accurately represent the cumulative noise exposure resulting from the operation of EYW as of the airport operator's planned NEM submittal letter. ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 14 Page D-177 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee Presentation SUBJECT TO REVISION October 4, 2022 2022 Existing Condition ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Noise Exposure Map a. .�� „/< I Pay.// //r///,i// /..,v� .✓,/, /ii,,>.,r/�, r 4, r,� ,,, ,"W,,4Wq�� ,I� �" m J +,,,.> •, i/%o, /��,�� 1,, ii//rr,/f�,/rr/,��,�ir%�„ ✓% � rK�F. ,u,®� , a�r��-,�iF, �.,...:c��r i ., /rrr rkti1^"," ,/ da,,,,./ f�li /,.✓/„,/i�,,,,r 9 r'.4 ,' �,^'�, ,�.<,,.�,/I�rr,�l,l�W ;;- �! 1 !'WW,:, r� ,,,,; f,,. / ¢"•''�%�/a%i/.//�i//rr i/fin ry ",' ° ,i� r �iirf�,�w�v i ,i�'h l4r,, V f r M V M, of'; 0 �/ /P', "t yr i!!u�i. L%'"W�,+ ✓� I ,!7�V ��/��,� V i a rr%/11 M, r / 1 '� i, '� �, �� w�4,,,; ,TacelLurtMewran r rw I �.,�t ru/'ai �oID / /� ILa�s SadNir�ars, S�ehnd„,y, �ti ,irr ^ivr ,,r ,/ C��de�mwni�ucm e, wed , i I r dr( S h ,:ll ,�,.:�,r�Yd�n,::H%� ,,:a '�v,�„,,,.. < <,�;..:,�,. r,�yt(�/l//�/ �_��,rll✓„�lG�i/.: tr!AiI'mlNc i ,,.• yps H�a�p��nrvmnru j e /r / / r .,, �,%/ �� f 1 dr,aY�O/ � �/��✓��/l(l�1�u*YrYG��//�� 11�D,/��1 1 p. I I� 1 1� I /; r% f r ffli t�/!1�/d'NI';, .;/ rrrr�i^�r✓rr�Jl�Jl�rnry ri N w aM�'P`.'�r �/ LEG H®+ r�/ r rrrr Iln�stwtutroruel Other Features, "jJI�/r/Var,Y� ... � )/1 ,,"Ua /,fit%%' , ✓i� ��>�// �� ,W.r .. .� h�krrll�rr.Pe+deurTMr,,andE��skILand COMMUnky Faicillity ff r ii f 11!/1//1 I /rr J 7�I CJKIL Open Space IHeawiluca!re Famlicly C3,75 LiNL Puaficr`_"„enau-FVAic House of Worstrrp Non-Compatible Land U%e Recreational gears a IRecnetatl©naE FaciNty EV Residental ingie Fainiffr Rewdential Swngle Familya SclroaoAtCaay Cane dF Hesidenflmad—Muld-Fa,7ronRy Resodent4l—Mobile Homes Florida Keys Overseas Transient,Lodging Rewdenti ad—Cra L1%-Fa,n^nlPV r` IPantdlllnrg,Trail IFKCaPT;k dr inslatutmnal Transient ILod um rseaa y'g Florida,I�:e�N`s Cage Leir�m�artl�ale Lar�ncl'ttlse 6..wra�cdasartme� 1Helrutage.Traud(FKGHT') .err rt,/� „`�,,r//r r ri I/,// //i�rr✓/ ,�ncultu�rad VacantA�Boundary fncartsra C�rrmeircr�I�Cfce I ,_. Cifty of Key'eat Boundary x l�lomeoe d�oILrMgr Boundary F 15 2022 Existing Condition NEM Number of Housing Key'Weist ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE International Airport Unmitigated(i.e.,Noncompatible) Residential—Single Family 41 2 0 43 Residential—Multi-Family 5 0 0 5 Key West by the Sea Condos 12 0 0 12 Ocean Walk Apts. 160 68 3 231 Las Salinas Condos 18 0 0 18 Transient Lodging 146 8 0 154 TOTAL UNMITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 382 78 3 463 Mitigated(i.e.,Compatible) Residential—Single Family 87 60 7 154 Residential—Multi-Family 3 1 0 4 Key West by the Sea Condos 88 0 0 88 TOTAL MITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 178 61 7 246 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 560 139 10 709 16 Page D-178 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee Presentation SUBJECT TO REVISION October 4, 2022 / Future Condition Num ber o by f Operations Category Key'West ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE International Airport SUMMARY OF 2028 FLIGHT OPERATIONS � � � IIII IILL� Irrr � nn ou on on IIII IIU IIII IN�' UW IIIV�' Ilp Irrr IIU� Irrr AC/AT JET 26,553 72.75 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. AC/AT PROP 8,636 23.66 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA PROP ITINERANT 18,038 49.42 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA PROP LOCAL 21435 6.67 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA JET 9,599 26.30 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. GA HELO 3,493 9.57 ......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. MIL ITINERANT 262 0.72 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. M I L LOCAL 92 0.25 .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. MIL HELO 88 0.24 TOTAL 69,196 189.58 17 2028 Future Condition ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 'N urro yPyjf 9Noise Exposure Map 5%,Z✓u,�////�'��/l r'�i��ri r�i//a�`//�/�rr�;r�" � °r�y r"�N„��ru l�,A„W�q�I>Ji�`'f r yt"r�,iI. „e!al r"�ly�lixo Il V �(vaILt+ltiK'Vo;�s W,rr�al�Iwrl'.✓r�f!�t��!Iv axAf I ; x r�V dr'✓�I.� l��%�/ mw'W ru N m i�%Ij%,. v r tllY�t!� h�,y -,� -o�..� .,;✓ ,,r., a,,;;,c �,,. /o,it,i/r, ; / // ,,. Jay �h ,��.d / �,cr r,�,// / .,�r�✓„ ��/�// , /i�r/ �,1: ,/ a Sri//,,,,�/i//l// f// l/,/�✓r,/ r, r ,M ia.r, ,,:,, , .4.,x��0ir /�,., r�i,�. r%//l%��%��%rl�',.'l�ii 1.✓=r ti'v1�� ` ,we,u^,.� �,,,,,rJ )v,r r, r� r�lr ,'�4. r�r,:vr fa'/i/i�i/', � ,;a.,, r��//��r/�l f�%//�✓��/ ar m p'�na, 'ri s'v'�ID�i r I� �wu'uy,�" ��n�y„,, i rI rII u- .. .,.. r �rrmIDw.f�✓�, %o��,. 1 ril//rff�//f�,vwW ,�d�v�/r,,e,�,yY r�,�-r,,r r � K) ,r ,,r ��1 (I II �I ,'` J 1N' I r i y �m�r ,✓� / � i ��, %�i�r yc o- ✓rl/F � � "".I w" f i � ��fi'r r', I /fl r ndr,; ., ��//��7r; .�,F;✓1w ti,sx�,.:li'M� /9 r(Y;, l �9I/�y I�, l f h N r Idrrf; 1 /r��„�,'1 rfyl JN r"a-...Cg ��`�✓'�,, M 7u,%,"�i�4, t" ;�".- r,,.i'r� 1/,(/uf,~(�""�,,,d/('rr��ti;,,� ✓x"r,.; �N o'W a �+;u,�r, r�'N�ryN"'"",.. 4 -�vw�.� �:r .,r. /r r,��f�I//�//// ., �� I,,"�" „, �,1jll, racLulkOan•an '�,s,r*nri,� ,�,,:,, N�.=chuulrchandlScRur.d�; i r ,«: ."Fr err ,r,., ✓...//r Eh�lne�Omaaikryl,,.,r St.03Yrb s, lu.es J it ✓/ ,N ry�/v r/,r,,,�wrr 1r ..,- °,r"..,�, ^�� „`"..r�/!�// i// �r �u, j.. i�rearruh"Wal9k�:. 'v dln,rr..... ,�f i3O /�' ... r,, 1J rra•��,rx F ,45 nub .,I ` �/� O�r�sbyi �raan '� ,,�#r W ill G�r ��t' j.�l �✓ � 'd pry wm a'tii IIIII M i1 ul ri,. ,,,rc>,,/,... ,r ,,,✓ i /1 �,f,�/ /r�//�.,�� ,,. 1.,,.,r f�lesrrJeasmr��'�uh�.... Rxe h"We'st1�1�� °� ! irk � `y r rir'9Mi✓/�xr,,rs'Y'byJJ�" / f/// fir/ uirir,!„ rii�� m�.art rrdl by OMBa'i LEGEND tlloa;se contours IlrnlskAr.lhi0fn,aI Other FeaWlres; 135,DiP19L Minnig,Peterlleurm and Gas Land C;orrirarwmmi Fa,cilYi 7�liP°JL Open Space '.•fit IHeatticareIFacmtyr 7.6 I NL PLAAJOSerm,P ublrs House of Wr"ship, Non-Compatible Land Use Recreatumal areas RecreatlanaM Facility m@ Redden l—Singhe Famrityy Resn�,c ervtyal &rtgle Family � SchodlDu y Fare dF Resldemtal—Mllu.ld-F'arnHy Resridendad—Mobile Hramtes Flerra*.T,Keys Overseas dffi Tramsaent Lodging Resvdentral f+tAb-FamOy *" FaddlinaglTrell(FKC)PT'p ✓/r//r ///! + Oh styt�ltmonal Transuent Lodging Florida Ker,Ovelrseas. Cnrmm atilhle Lveaycll Ig,se YrvOarlctas-tweut, 'Heri>tageTrwd(FM:C1HT) A cult tra0 Vacant AwrportBo1ndary mndw�tm,al �cnmelrc�t�tce ' C uh at Key ae3k Boundary/��,.,,/////,,,//� ✓�///Rio„ai�/ ,i r rr/ Mcarrrr,e Counly talunda^,r „.v*s" .,r �/I��//i/��rrf��j��/�/i�O �i//ix/p�%/I/%//I /✓/pj/r f/ir�.r;r%, r.;, —F�. - �»e�� iN r�,rvs(uid�n rmuum41 r L/r r/:;.rrr ri rr r r r r 1r rr/r7r(ria r% �✓///r//(/�%/!!�///��//��//��j/�'% ��.�,,,, �;...,„� v-,:e ;;,.:',,r r',.;�, ..nl///"%//%r'%///-%///„',ro%/,G�/r✓�%��//�/✓��%f/,i//, r,/ ,�r;ii riir, 18 Page D-179 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee Presentation SUBJECT TO REVISION October 4, 2022 2028 Future Condition NEM Number of Housing Units International Airport CzM,1E1z1=M111E=��== Key'West ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE µ µ Unmitigated(i.e.,Noncompatible) Residential—Single Family 45 5 0 50 Residential—Multi-Family 5 0 0 5 Key West by the Sea Condos 21 0 0 21 Ocean Walk Apts. 159 77 6 242 Las Salinas Condos 39 0 0 39 Transient Lodging 145 14 0 159 TOTAL UNMITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 414 96 6 516 Mitigated(i.e.,Compatible) Residential—Single Family 96 63 8 167 Residential—Multi-Family 3 1 0 4 Key West by the Sea Condos 183 0 0 183 TOTAL MITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 282 64 8 354 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 696 160 14 870 19 Changes Between 2022 and 2028 NEMs Number of Housing Units Key'West ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE International Airport Unmitigated(i.e.,Noncompatible) Residential—Single Family 4 3 0 7 Residential—Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 Key West by the Sea Condos 9 0 0 9 Ocean Walk Apts. -1 9 3 11 Las Salinas Condos 21 0 0 21 Transient Lodging -1 6 0 5 TOTAL UNMITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 32 18 3 53 Mitigated(i.e.,Compatible) Residential—Single Family 9 3 1 13 Residential—Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 Key West by the Sea Condos 95 0 0 95 TOTAL MITIGATED HOUSING UNITS 104 3 1 108 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 136 21 4 161 20 Page D-180 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee Presentation SUBJECT TO REVISION October 4, 2022 Changes Between / r rr A ! uI N 1 IW�rI y�, �✓l r fi"'r m I�� W`w to- 1I/ �4 2022 and 2028 NEMs ,rl PDX ' ,,,,,"rrr i/ x rr//i-/I//�,il %% i /!r r r r' uDti tilt✓ „ w ,,,, II fl r ;.:/ //<. /,, rr,l ,�//✓l/oi,,n../// ,:: rec o ,,.v Y,,;:,,., ,.. ,�.�1 ,,,�„w,,., Y ' wr w�;i:. ,, ✓�%i ///,l%�/,f�,/ % x�/%i�. ,Wf'!4r. tr DI ,fir... ro r y iv, `,:: io; ,1 u ///� ........ ,a / �"r�" ,.. !•I w't;'ux`r °�/� W,ci .fir IVI� �'rol�/ri/' `/�1 � %r,` ,�nrnrd�/,,,�„ cwau N��:,.�.�n:"'" ,; 11��1 ,'�.w � �i,,,, l�%"'W'" o,. ';.. ,.:,. w r,,,✓/,' r,irf ��.�I rr "If€...',ei� r„ ,.. gin„... ��II -,. ,,k,,r,:r �,",�w+*„",."` „�� f��' I%��';, I f W , ., .:.f ,., 11,,,,.r�✓.,...�� ,,,..w.. ,.,,..... ,r".... ..„r.. ��f�� /, r.,.. IL�s Salunar.� . 7 1V rfl,� .'�„ n,�,y�q;•-�. o,..l. -„r�%.. �,,,. ,.. :.��a., ,,'. ..e.'.V� � ./ll//.,,. I r,��,.r.,r_'—„,„,r...r.., , 6 ✓ra .y, /�/1 1 ry r,//%r ,vB 1 /r/./ 1�1 ,//l�� I, ,h rz,r m„��'r,N �l„uf,r c a,r,rH '� �r .0-~'• r,m ;1 ,In�',r/�/�� i ;r;v"rW�',,rr '1��+�,d�7"r✓�h ,, „�*,,n r, ,, �y `^,..^<�w,,,r /� � , ,,wd,,."✓ ,/ 'n:..,,ry�r1 ,,,,,,�iXkr r ,; �- til� ��,�� u,,,,,,,,, ;, ,,,,;.�� :�/�j�j/ // , ... �I.,.�� ' ,..�._.... �°,`'d��/d'✓'r �'y�a ru,�;�.uw.�„ �'%/.. ,.� �� -a.. ' . ,.,,.��j��//�� /�j., ,,., GMcearrW+WalVk.. r, :.I.I��IA i�� Ip n Inn Tattwwrvagv rd r/�//r� I •,...IIIII� H,reAp Err "rxv Exk�emisi��m I' I � /D I III 4 I„S r r / / it i I / / / my " 1 rl i III""W it I f Y �I I. LE G EH D -i Existi:n!g Condition MIiii Iletrolelrlri„and Gas Land Other Features SSE 9~II+dL P°tuaise Crai>ItwcaWr Open space t,ommaulr itur Facwlity 028 Future Condition Pu bfli iSerrall PuINC / ', Heiallhilare Fa 111ty Fi`n RI'JL Noise Co1rlCronar Recreaturnnl Areas Idom t=:uxrNa atutite Lund Use House of lv�olr Inre�+ ReMnde'r RiaGknyle Fannl�y vo Residential—rrngN�Fa�rmoWy i FdealreatuDnal Factllityr Resodentall Nallobde Ficnies `^chootdC!ayr Care IR'es�dentlal—�rtuulkl-Fs,rnylyr Re'svdenFialt Multi-Family Flu�n;da Keys Overseas Trsarrsuelmt Lodging / Traa sieO Lo'd+gmi x"b Paddling Trail(FKOPTp Institutional �VlncVass,ifled Ronda Keys Overseas Compatible Lalrral 4.#s,e , h� Heauka le Tiall,I dFItiI0FN'T' ..�I Incu"ItrxraE IAHr zsrt 6ouimdar Cr�mm�7er�iaJrr47�Ice 4911�"� p y Industrial I City of Key West Boufldary llrr.sh,utralnal Mic(Rroe County Eulmeurr�!ar m /�m,xl;rll�lol��m�i 4,r s G l r I r r ✓o r r/r J" /��ii/,„�i/�%��i%%%��///�% 21 Changes Be ee tw n 11........... 2022 and 2028NEMs ��y�M� Key'Weist ANALYSIS RESULTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE International Airport • The area within the 2028 Future Condition noise contours increased in size by 29.9 acres or approximately 6.6%. • This increase can be attributed to the increase in aircraft operations. • Contours shifted to the west,which can be attributed to the relocation of Taxiway B to the end of the pavement.As a result,all aircraft departing on Runway 09 begin their takeoff roll at the end of the pavement. • The 2028 Future Condition NEM encompasses 30 more acres of noncompatible land when compared to the 2022 Existing Condition NEM. • The total housing units and population within the DNL 65 dB noise contour increases by approximately 23 percent. 22 Page D-181 DRAFT DOCUMENT Ad Hoc Committee Presentation SUBJECT TO REVISION October 4, 2022 w Noise Exposure Maps F, and Supporting Documentation Key West Remaining Steps International Airport 1. Public Comments will be reviewed, and responses will be provided as appropriate. 2. Section 6.5 of the NEM Document will be updated to ref lect comments received during the public comment period. 3. Copies of all comments will be included in Appendix E, Section EA of the NEM Document. 4. A revised draft document will be provided to the BOCC for review and approval at their meeting on December 7, 2022. 5. The f inal draft document will be submitted to the FAA following the BOCC meeting. 6. The FAA will acknowledge receipt of the document and indicate whether in compliance with applicable requirements. If so, the FAA will publish a Notice of Compliance in the Federal Register. 23 Page D-182 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION Monroe County, Florida Key West International Airport (EYW) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is conducting a study to evaluate the noise compatibility of Key West International Airport with the surrounding communities. This study, a "Noise Exposure Map (NEM) Update," follows the process outlined in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. As required by 14 CFR Part 150, the BOCC has prepared Draft Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) that depict the airport, aircraft noise contours, and surrounding land uses. The BOCC has made the Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation (NEMs) available for public review and comment. After review and consideration of comments, the BOCC will submit the NEMs to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the agency's determination that the maps comply with applicable requirements. AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Beginning on Monday, September 19, 2022, the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be available for download from the Airport's website at https://eyw.com/public-notices. Printed copies will be available through October 20, 2022, at the following locations: • Monroe County Public Library [700 Fleming Street, Key West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 292-3595]. A printed copy of the Draft NEM document is available for review at the library and a limited number of flash drives containing the Draft NEM document are also available. • Airport Administration, Key West International Airport [3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 809-5239]. A printed copy of the Draft NEM is available for public review during normal business hours. A limited number of flash drives containing the Draft NEM document are also available. • Office of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates [500 Whitehead Street, Suite 102, Key West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 292-3440]. A printed copy of the Draft NEM document is available for public review during normal business hours. A limited number of flash drives containing the Draft NEM document are also available. PUBLIC MEETING Monroe County will host a public meeting on Tuesday, October 4, 2022, beginning at 2:00 p.m. (ending at approximately 4:00 p.m.) local time at the Harvey Government Center, 1200 Truman Avenue (Upstairs in the Commission Chambers), Key West, Florida 33040. A presentation on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be made during the Page D-183 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION regular meeting of Monroe County's Ad Hoc Committee on Noise. The public is invited and encouraged to attend. There will be an opportunity to ask questions and receive answers in real-time during the meeting. Forms will be available to provide written comments. VIRTUAL MEETING ATTENDANCE:Tuesday, October 4, 2022, beginning at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at: https://mcbocc.zoom.us/o/87124696382 or participants can call in to listen to the meeting at 646-518- 9805 or 669-900-6833.The Webinar ID is 8712469 6382. ADA ASSISTANCE: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person needing a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate in this proceeding should contact the County Administrator's Office at (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) days prior to the scheduled meeting. If you are hearing- or voice-impaired, call 711. WRITTEN COMMENTS Written comments will be accepted at the meeting or by email or mail. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. local time on Thursday, October 20, 2022. Please ensure adequate time for mailing. Written comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft noise exposure maps and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations may be submitted electronically at b..y.I........................................................................................................................................... .......... or by mail to: Key West International Airport Administrative Office 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, FL 33040 Please note that comments can only be accepted with the full name and address of the individual commenting. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask to have your personal identifying information withheld from public review, it cannot be guaranteed. Comments received on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation and the responses to those comments will be included in the Final NEM document. Page D-184 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION II III Hame About Photos Reviews Videos Post Key West International Airport . Se W NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 'The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners BOCC is conducting a study to evaluate the noise compatibility of Ivey West. International Airport with the surrounding communities. ' hl s study, a 'Noise Exposure Map NEM Update," follows the process outlined in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations CFF Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. As required by 14 CFR Part 150, the BOCC has prepared Draft Noise Exposure Maps NETTS that depict the airport, aircraft noise contours, and surrounding land uses. The BO,CC has remade the Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation (NE Ms), available for public review and comment., After review and consideration of comments, the BOCC gill submr t the NEMs to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), for time agency's determination that the, maps comply with applicable requirements. AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Beginning today, the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be,available for download from time Airport's rebste at -//eyw,.com!:/pu b I ic-not ices. 'To view this public notice in its entirety,, including public meeting information, visit https,.He,y,w.com/noise,-conce,rns and click on "Notice Of Availability Of Draft Noise Exposure flaps" w or Key West International Airport, (D4, 1 re e I.Jke Comment Ili are 00 CDDI Moms Friends W t+h Marketplace �4o tifi 1:0 r I S Menu u Page D-185 DRAFT DOCUMENT WESUBJECT TO REVISION N r, f Monroe County,Florida Key West International Airport (EYW) Key West Citizen-Florida Free Press-Paradise NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Date: September 16, 2022 The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is conducting a study to evaluate the noise compat- ibility of Key West International Air- port with the surrounding communi- - L E GAL AD PROOF — ties.This study,a"Noise Exposure Map (NEM) Update," follows the process outlined in Title 14 of the Code of Fed- eral Regulations(CFR)Part 150,Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. As required by 14 CFR Part 150, the BOCThank you for advertising with us! This is the roof of our ad scheduled to run on sure has prepared Draft Noise Expo- Thank g p y sure Maps (NEMs)that depict the air- the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact port, aircraft noise contours, and sur- rounding land uses. The BOCC has Melinda Prescott email to legals@keysnews.com made the Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation(NEMs) available for public review and com- ment. After review and consideration of comments,the BOCC will submit the NEMs to the Federal Aviation Adminis- CUSTOMER INFORMATION tration(FAA)for the agency's determi- nation that the maps comply with ap- plicable requirements. Account#: 420155 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPO- Company Name: MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS SURE MAPS Address: 3491 S ROOSEVELT BLVD Beginning on Monday, September 19, KEY WEST FL 33040 2022, the Draft the Noise Exposure Telephone: (305)809-5239 Maps and Supporting Documentation will be available for download from Email: leto-beth@monroecounty-fl.gov the Airport's website at https://eyw. com/public-notices. Printed copies will be available through October 20,2022,at the following lo- cations: • Monroe County Public Library [700 AD INFORMATION Fleming Street, Key West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 292-3595]. A printed copy of the Draft NEM document is Ad ID: 3862731 available for review at the library and a limited number of flash drives contain- Run Dates: 09/17/22 to 09/21/22 ing the Draft NEM document are also #of Inserts: 3 Account Rep: Melinda Prescott- Legal available. •Airport Administration,Key West In- #of Lines: 155 Email: legals@keysnews.com ternational Airport [3491 South Roo- Ad Class: 26 sevelt Boulevard, Key West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 809-5239]. A printed copy of the Draft NEM is available for Total Cost: $372.00 public review during normal business hours.A limited number of flash drives Ordered By: containing the Draft NEM document Description: Notice of Availability are also available. •Office of Mayor Pro Tern Craig Cates [500 Whitehead Street,Suite 102,Key Publications Start Date End Date #of Insertions West, FL 33040; telephone (305) 292- 34401.A printed copy of the Draft NEM Key West Citizen 09/17/22 09/17/22 1 document is available for public review Florida Keys Free Press 09/21/22 09/21/22 1 during normal business hours.A limited number of flash drives containing the KeysNews.com 09/17/22 09/17/22 1 Draft NEM document are also available. PUBLIC MEETING Monroe County will host a public meeting on Tuesday, October 4, 2022, beginning at 2:00 p.m. (ending at ap- proximately 4:00 p.m.) local time at the Harvey Government Center, 1200 Truman Avenue (Upstairs in the Com- mission Chambers), Key West, Florida 33040.A presentation on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be made during the regular meeting of Monroe Coun- ty's Ad Hoc Committee on Noise.The public is invited and encouraged to at- tend.There will be an opportunity to ask questions and receive answers in re- al-time during the meeting.Forms will be available to provide written com- ments. VIRTUAL MEETING ATTENDANCE:Tues- day,October 4,2022,beginning at 2:00 p.m.Eastern Time at: https:Hmcbocc.zoom.us/i/871 24696382 Page D-186 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION or participants can call in to listen to the meeting at 646-518-9805 or 669- 900-6833.The Webinar ID is 871 2469 6382. ADA ASSISTANCE: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,any person needing a special accommoda- tion or an interpreter to participate in this proceeding should contact the County Administrator's Office at(305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5)days prior to the scheduled meeting. If you are hearing-or voice-impaired, call 711. WRITTEN COMMENTS Written comments will be accepted at the meeting or by email or mail.Com- ments must be received by 5:00 p.m.lo- cal time on Thursday,October 20,2022. Please ensure adequate time for mail- ing. Written comments concerning the cor- rectness and adequacy of the draft noise exposure maps and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations may be submitted electronically at deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com or by mail to:Key West International Air- port Administrative Office 3491 S.Roo- sevelt Blvd.Key West,FL 33040 Please note that comments can only be accepted with the full name and ad- dress of the individual commenting. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other per- sonal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your en- tire comment,including your personal identifying information,may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask to have your personal identifying information withheld from public review,it cannot be guaranteed. Comments received on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation and the responses to those comments will be included in the Final NEM document. 09/17/2022-KWC 420155 3862731 Page D-187 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION The Florida Keys Only Daily Newspaper, Est. 1876 PO Box 1800,Key West FL 33041 P:(305)292-7777 ext.219 F:(305)295-8025 legals@keysnews.com MONROE CO DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 3491 S ROOSEVELT BLVD KEY WEST FL 33040 Account: 420155 Ticket: 3863824 PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA [Iegal.text] COUNTY OF MONROE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Melinda Prescott ,who on oath says that he or she is The legal advertising representative of the Key West Citizen,a five day newspa- per published in Key West, in Monroe County, Florida;that the attached copy of advertisment, being a legal notice in the matter of was published in said newspa- per in the issues of: Wednesday,September 21,2022 Affiant further says that the Key West Citizen is a newspaper published in Key West, in said Monroe County, Florida and that the said newspapers has hereto- fore been continuously published in said Monroe County, Florida Tuesday thru Saturday weekly, and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post office in Key West, in said Monroe County, Florida,for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person,firm or corporation any discount, rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertise- ment for publication in the said newspaper. IN (Signature of Affiant) Affirmed and subscribed before me this 21 st day of September 2022 (Notary Public Signature) Laura M Robins (Notary Public Printed Name) My commission expires 9/26/2026 Personally Known X Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced (Notary Seal) ap Florida ,v, ra Rablat Page D-188 DRAFT DOCUMENT THE KEYWEST CITIZEN♦WEDNESDAY,SEPTEMBER 21,2022 SUBJECT TO REVISION 7A NA`.1`1('_')N w(A-1)"! p11''), UN chief: World is 'paralyzed' and equity is slipping away4 , L�1 rrf rI ICON BY EDITH M.LEDERER of people are on the edge 'r fS''' �f' ,, /1 i r/ 1 i✓ The Associated Press ;///;,,,,,, ;°'01;10i/',;,,i,/,,,,, �y;/ of famine It is,he said,an JIN %�f 1 %�//�///n� ay�r%// �ra; S�it�Z �Z�G example of promise and p Y //// //i 1/i f a 1�yJ 1� r/iiif� UNITED NATIONS—In ��/ ; �� poi, hoe"in a world teeming � "� �/ I� V�b1i1��)JYi //airr / d J�%�i� r',r k , ��jl%/an alarming assessment,the //j%///r r l/, f , �/ with turmoil." lk i head of the United Nations /f ;r ,/,"2f1r ( // y(p He stressed that r, " � r �, warned world leaders /�/1I" f i,'fj// Jfj ' �?'`%„i<< cooperation and dialogue r' ,, Tuesday that nations t are / j% /%/ are the only path forward to Raeht =%� gridlocked in colossal global . ,,,,, r%r iAFir, maintain global peace—two rii////may(''/N� %�i�/J,'�s I `�� r/i�i .«,,w dysfunction and aren't fundamental U.N.principles ready or willing to tackle since its founding afterWorld the challenges that threaten War II.And he warned that X humanity's future—and no power or group alone l% the planet's."Our world is in can call the shots." • e he MARY ALTAFFER/The Associated Press Lets work as one,as a Peril—and paralyzed," " ' said. coalition of the world,as United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres Speaking at the opening addresses the 77th session of the General Assembly at U.N. united nations,"he urged of the General Assembly's headquarters Tuesday,Sept.20 leaders gathered in the vast fly rr annual high-level meeting, General Assembly hall. Secretary-General Antonio are based on a model"that interruptions,including an It's rarely that easy. �)I; Guterres made sure to monetizes outrage, anger entirely virtual meeting in Geopolitical divisions arei # = 0 emphasize that hope and negativity"and bus 2020 and a hybrid one last undermining the work of p p Y Y b remained.But his remarks and sells data"to influence year.This week,the halls of the U.N.Security Council, = reflected a tense and worried our behavior." Artificial the United Nations are filled international law,people's world.He cited the war in intelligence he said, "is once more with delegates trust in democratic ISLAMORADA,VILLAGE OF ISLANDS Ukraine and multiplying compromising the integrity reflecting the worlds institutions and most forms conflicts around the world, of information systems, cultures.Many faces were of international cooperation, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING the climate emergency,the the media, and indeed visible,though all delegates Guterres said. dire financial situation of democracy itself." are required to wear masks "The divergence between NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Thursday,October developing countries and The world lacks even except when speaking to developed and developing 6,2022,at 5:30 PM.,the Islamorada,Village of Islands setbacks in U.N.goals for the beginning of"a global ward off the coronavirus. countries,between North Village Council will hold a public hearing at Founders Park 2030 including an end to architecture"to deal with Guterres made sure to start and South, between the Community Center located at 87000 Overseas Highway, extreme poverty and quality the ripples caused by these out by sounding a note of privileged and the rest,is Islamorada,Florida.The purpose of the public hearing is to education for all children. new technologies because hope.He showed a photo of becoming more dangerous consider the following items: He also warned of what he of"geopolitical tensions," the first U.N.-chartered ship by the day,"the secretary- called"a forest of red flags" Guterres said. carrying grain from Ukraine general said."It is at the root A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF around new technologies His opening remarks came —part of the deal between of the geopolitical tensions ISLAMORADA,VILLAGE OF ISLANDS,FLORIDA, despite promising advances as leaders from around the Ukraine and Russia that the and lack of trust that CONSIDERING THE REQUEST OF MAREK to heal diseases and planet reconvened at U.N. United Nations and Turkey poison every area of global KIYASHKA(RUSSELL A.YAGEL,ESQ.,AGENT) connect people.Guterres headquarters in New York helped broker—to the Horn cooperation,from vaccines FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE DOCK LENGTH said social media platforms after three years of pandemic of Africa, where millions to sanctions to trade. VARIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 30-1550(G) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES "i,�f City Hall Monroe County,Florida TO ALLOW A DOCK CONSISTING OF A 115- „,, w 1300 White Street FOOT LONG WALKWAY WITH A 12.5-FOOT Key West FL 33040 Key West International Airport BY 12-FOOT(150 SQUARE FOOT)TERMINAL (EYW) City of Key West,FL PLATFORM FOR A TOTAL LENGTH OF 127 FEET Meetln Agenda Full Detail NOTICE OF AVAILABILITYOF4DRAFTNOISEEXPOSUREMAPS AS MEASURED FROM THE MEAN HIGH WATER g gens u ea D LINE(MHWL),THEREBY EXCEEDING BY 27 FEET Historic Architectural Review Commission NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING THE MAXIMUM LENGTH ALLOWED FOR DOCKS. uesday,September 27,2022 5:00 PM City Hall The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)is conducting THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 81486 a study to evaluate the noise compatibility of Key West International Airport OVERSEAS HIGHWAY ON UPPER MATECUMBE ADA Assistance:It is the policy of the City of Key West to comply with with the surrounding communities.This study,a"Noise Exposure Map(NEM) KEY IN THE NATIVE RESIDENTIAL(NR)ZONING p y y y p Y Update,"follows the process outlined in Title 14 of the Code of Federal all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).Please Regulations(CFR)Part 150,Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. DISTRICT WITH PARCEL ID#00404590-000000. call the TTY number 1-800-955-8771 or for voice 1-800-955-8770 or the ADA Coordinator at 305-809-3811 at least five business days in As required by 14 CFR Part 150,the BOCC has prepared Draft Noise Exposure SECOND READINGS advance for sign language interpreters,assistive listening devices, Maps(NEMs)that depict the airport,aircraft noise contours,and surrounding or materials in accessible format. land uses.The BOCC has made the Draft Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation(NEMs)available for public review and comment. AN ORDINANCE OF ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE FOR VISUAL PRESENTATIONS:Individuals are responsible to share After review and consideration comments,the will submit the NEMs OF ISLANDS,FLORIDA,AMENDING CHAPTER their presentation at the meeting on their laptop through Zoom.For to the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)for thehe agency's determination " that the maps comply with applicable requirements. 66"WATERWAYS",ARTICLE I IN GENERAL, City Commission meetings the City Clerk's Office will need a copy for SECTION 66-2 "OPERATION OF VESSELS IN the agenda at least 6 days before the meeting. AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS RESTRICTED AREAS"OF THE VILLAGE CODE You may attend/participate virtually via Zoom by telephoning 646- Beginning on Monday,September 19,2022,the Draft the Noise Exposure TO MODIFY THE VESSEL EXCLUSION ZONE/ 558-8656 Meeting ID:834 7003 7828 Passcode:009482 or online Maps and Supporting Documentation will be available for download from the SWIM AREA GENERALY LOCATED OFF OF at:httos://cityofkeywest-fl-gov.zoom.us/m/83470037828 Airport's website at https:Heyw.com/public-notices. PORT ANTIGUA AND WHITE MARLIN BEACH Passcode:009482 Printed copies will be available through October 20,2022,at the following ON LOWER MATECUMBE KEY,AS FURTHER locations: DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT"A";PROVIDING FOR Call Meeting To Order •Monroe County Public Library[700 Fleming Street,Key West,FL SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN Roll Call 33040;telephone(305)292-35951.A printed copy of the Draft NEM document is available for review at the library and a limited number THE CODE;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of flash drives containing the Draft NEM document are also available. DATE. •Airport Administration,Key West International Airport[3491 South Approval of Agenda Roosevelt Boulevard,Key West,FL 33040;telephone(305)809-5239]. Administering the Oath by the Clerk of the Commission A printed copy of the Draft NEM is available for public review during AN ORDINANCE OF ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE normal business hours.A limited number of flash drives containing the OF ISLANDS,FLORIDA,AMENDING CHAPTER Approval of Minutes Draft NEM document are also available. 50"STREETS,SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC •Office of Mayor Pro Tem Craig Cates[500 Whitehead Street,Suite 1 July 27,2022 102,Key West,FL 33040;telephone(305)292-3440].A printed copy PLACES"OF THE VILLAGE CODE,TO CREATE of the Draft NEM document is available for public review during normal SECTION 50-2 "SMOKING PROHIBITED" TO 2 September 12,2022(Special) business hours.A limited number of flash drives containing the Draft PROHIBIT SMOKING IN VILLAGE PARKS AND NEM document are also available. BEACHES, AND TO PROHIBIT SMOKING IN HARC Planner's Report PUBLIC MEETING COUNTY PARKS AND BEACHES;PROVIDING FOR Chief Assistant City Attorney's Report Monroe County will host a public meeting on Tuesday,October 4,2022, SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN Old Business beginning at 2:00 p.m.(ending at approximately 4:00 p.m.)local time at THE CODE;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE the Harvey Government Center,1200 Truman Avenue(Upstairs in the DATE. Commission Chambers),Key West,Florida 33040.A presentation on the 3 Modifications to front,side,and rear walls of an existing addition. Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be made Second-story addition at rear of the property-#411 Louisa Street during the regular meeting of Monroe County's Ad Hoc Committee on Noise. A copy of the items may be reviewed at the Village -Robert A.Jensen(H2O22-0030) The public is invited and encouraged to attend.There will be an opportunity Administrative Center and Public Safety Headquarters, to ask questions and receive answers in real-time during the meeting.Forms 86800 Overseas Highway)Islamorada,Florida. 4 Demolition of non-historic side and rear roof overhangs. will be available to provide written comments. Partial demolition of front,rear,and side walls of existing rear addition #411 Louisa Street-Robert A.Jensen(H2O22-0030) VIRTUAL MEETING ATTENDANCE:Tuesday,October/j 2022,beginning Affected parties may appear at the public hearing,be heard, at 2:00 p.m.Eastern Time at:https://mcbocc.zoom.us/j/871 the at 6 6-518-9805 or 6 or and submit evidence with respect to the applications. 5 Replace existing metal roof on main gable with new standing participants can call in ID listen to the meeting at 646 518-9805 or 669 900-6833.The Webinar ID is 871 2469 6382. seam metal system-#1108 Fleming Street-MTM Building and Pursuant to Section 286.0105,Florida Statutes,anyone Roofing(H2022-0033) ADA ASSISTANCE:In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. wishing to appeal decision made b the Islamorada any person needing a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate g pp any y New Business in this proceeding should contact the County Administrator's Office at(305) Village Council with respect to any matter considered at such 292-4441,between the hours of 8:30 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.,no later than five meeting or hearing will need a record of the proceedings and, purpose)maur (5)days prior to the scheduled meeting.If you are hearing-or voice-impaired, for such need to ensure that a verbatim record 6 Proposed to be Postponed by Staff call 711. p p y New one-story frame dwelling.Existing structure has been of the proceeding is made,prepared by a court reporter at the condemned by the CBO-#703 Windsor Lane-One Call WRITTEN COMMENTS appellants expense;such record includes the testimony and Construction(H2O22-0034) evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Written comments will be accepted at the meeting or by email or mail. 7 New two-story side addition-#1002 Fleming Street-Robert Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.local time on Thursday,October Delaune(H2022-0039) 20,2022.Please ensure adequate time for mailing. ADA Assistance:In accordance with the Americans with Written comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Disabilities Act of 1990,all persons who are disabled and 8 Partial demolition of second floor east wall-#1002 Fleming noise exposure maps and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations may be who need special accommodations to participate in this Street-Robert Delaune(H2022-0039) submitted electronically at deborah.murphy.lagos@gmail.com or by mail to: meeting because of that disability should contact the office 9 New wood frame single family residence.New pool,picket fences Key West International Airport Administrative Office of the Village ADA Coordinator at(305)664-6448(TTY 664- and site improvements-#522 Olivia Street-Matthew Stratton 3491 S.Roosevelt Blvd. 8890)at least three days prior thereto. (H2022-0040) Key West,FL 33040 Please note that comments can only be accepted with the full name and Two or more committee members from various committees 10 Demolition of existing one-story structure and accessory address of the individual commenting.Before including your address,phone maybe present at this meeting. structures-#522 Olivia Street-Matthew Stratton(H2022-0040) number,e-mail address,or other personal identifying information in your comment,be advised that your entire comment,including your personal identifying information,may be made publicly available at any time.While ;>• /I°°"� Comments from Commissioners you may ask to have your personal identifying information withheld from public review,it cannot be guaranteed.Comments received on the Draft the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation and the responses to Daniel J.Gulizio Adjournment those comments will be included in the Final NEM document. Director of Planning and Development Services zJn-M62757-1 adno--3863824-1 adno=3863848-1 Page D-189 DRAFT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION APPENDIX G LARGE SCALE FLIGHT TRACK MAPS AND NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS G.1 INTRODUCTION Title 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, Amendment No. 150-4, Section A150.103(b)(1), requires "A map of the airport and its environs at an adequately detailed scale (not less than 1 inch to 2,000 feet) indicating runway length, alignments, landing thresholds, takeoff start-of-roll points, airport boundary,and flight tracks out to at least 30,000 feet from the end of each runway." Pursuant to this requirement, the following maps are provided in this appendix: • Figure G.1 — East Flow Flight Tracks • Figure G.2—West Flow Flight Tracks • Figure G.3—2022 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map • Figure GA—2028 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map G.2 REFERENCES Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, 14 C.F.R.§150 (1984). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter- /subchapter-1/part-150 Page G-1 �31VCldn W3N W r � 1� L IMOd211d IVNO11VNH31N1 S)13eal 44611.1 M01.1 ISB3 1S3M A3M T coC) L _ m N 4 U = 17) O = C U o O z I I I O a E o m m m TO _ � � � c .N o O O O m '6 U) (6 U y N C U U E f6 a Z > U LL o 0 W �ZhY LU L o W J J co co w N U i O E (i L (0 m a N O �� U LL m >� 'a T o (� c�6 O > N U O N ti ik l,! N III I I 906 ftftft 9D7 v� � luu ° , a j/ sas I f t� � 1 I ti �=��i: CP ` •, mill � III i .ti d 1 1 t It ui —140 II t oai d) �V��! IIIIII x w � N W m Cn H Z W U Q �. W 31VCldn W3N � � L N IHOd211d IVNO11VNH31N1 r S)IOeal I1.1611=1 M01=1 ISOM :) 1S3M A3M a T U - N T E _ N O E LL = (p N � � O C O C C U o -0 O z I I I a N O (0 (6 (0 J fa aJ O O O N m U 'O -0 'O U m r? U to (n (n C: U U c m WLo J J � w zm U O c U ~ > O E m 'a N _ rn _�� o O U J LL m >a)If o j (6 O > N U U C — 0- Q T70 C N Q O Q Y L Q c c 2 O ` N v Q N ZVLZ CD u UIII t� u� 0 YI�C QI 11 1 r r \ I� d I,aLz 27D2 ,f �t \•i t r J'ii z _' ui LU •I ii � m z w f U O f I� I� cl 3.LVadnW3N w IMOdUIV IVNOIIVNH31NI deW ainsodx3 OSI.ON UOIMPU03 BURSI.X3 ZZOZ IS3M A3M Z"' 'o 'o 0 LL 0. S. u, co E 2 E 0 0 0 0 LL C) M G� 0 EM am EM 70 C) 2 let 0 (D E Z' 0 z 0 . LU 2 0 0 -E E .................C—:) LU _j A E 2 0 G� of 0� oe E E 4 r D 65 2 76 0 '65 z z z CL 0 0 cl 0 z� E u 0 w w Z CL E 0 0 z z 01, "22ow 211, N, Wf I pgg, �oa PC//! ,sk A S, �)P T gy, NO 7, 4, U dd K, A V� jo RON" ;�9 4way vp ow r1f e k N V, 7th I ,;Ij;�, 0"', e I In k f g1fif I 6th Ter,:.". 114 41, Igg as, ®r" ........... lob'5 0 INA 7, F dl, e �A, ij/ 33/ oWPI�ok I k1hi "M" VE; A 0, 7 D I'D ...........; % J0, jol N OR, M, 3.LVadnW3N w Ix IHOdHIV IVNOIIVNH31NI deW ejnsodx3 GSI.ON uoil!puoo ojnln=l SZOZ IS3M A3M o-, -o' �2 0-0- LL 0 P 0) E 10 0 0 1, LL C) G� U) + # U rd ............ % rf'�'4J I ..... E LU A 0 LU ol yj E 05 2 5) 0 -j 0 4, CL In E o CL a E 0 0 0 z 9z KI NO ,/it A e e �P�o)' "0'0' k,40R! k\A F", 'I",Wl'W, M m/ e p, 'Af)"'i 1 6th Te 00)", In A A 'aw- 0 'R11, VI okrs; g' ''011 A A/l J" MOO WN 10 I 0) 1 1 P- W V 'o '011 00 gg"lip, Ir "N' m wy /�'II If,% k.......... al We -7 OPP, ii, N51:1' gq 7 9L NJ 1A N My" "0' IN �0"m 'N 24 xvA '91�b tra ai 0 tooOf Key West, Internati" onal Airport Noise Exposure Maps and ■ ■ uppor ing ocumen a ion Tuesda November 15th , 2022 y, Public Review of Draft NoiseMapsKeyWest Ex osure p and Supporting Documentation International Airport 1 . Notice of Availability was published in the Key West Citizen and keysnews.com and posted on Facebook. 2. Public Review: September 19 — October 20, 2022. 3. Document was available for download from the Airport's website at: ces ,.hftj......................Egyyiir a iii ii9 tii 4. Printed copies of the document were available at: a) Public Library on Fleming Street b) Airport Administrative Office c) Office of Mayor Pro Tern Craig Cates Public n theo Draft NoiseMapsKeyWest Ex osure p and Supporting Documentation International Airport The most common themes identified in the public comments include the following: • The consecutive 12-month period to be used for the existing condition noise contours • The source(s) of data used to determine the number of aircraft operations, aircraft types, day/night distribution, runway utilization, and flight tracks • The use of stage length to determine aircraft weight / departure profile since load factors at EYW are typically higher than average. • The use of a "hold-down" procedure for departures on Runway 09 • The use of back taxi procedure for departures on Runway 09 • The use of "standing takeoff' procedure • The size and shape of the updated noise contours 2022 Existing Condition Noise Exposure Map r I I' *� /%;/ !�L, � //rr//� � ri /%/, r, �✓r � ��i '�"ICI IN f ' ;,/I✓/y":, �/,'Nr a/;. %�%/¢,s ;V„carn"'" ,rrlrl,d„ „ "' �.. ,rr,-ram- G ,w o. r �,,,' ; '. '� <rl vdv G„ �.� " I rym✓� '/1 r:✓r/,,^Y, „i// IJ,.,m 'h,4,� ', ,��. ,,..ry ', „ „r lr, r.✓;✓7%9 „� � f^Y ,ir,: , ei, r, � I �jl �✓„„t I sk';C Iv IIIIII / / I r h6Vl� ,ate"6 T" � „ fir, ,n.m, o."� !,./ wr s. ",yr „/// �rl:l.. "" rm",,•A „w:,./ .../' r"'i „i, %.. ifrw r / m,,r Gracs ILuk am r �, ;,,,,'mly ,;N,o �„ '.Ir✓ 'r� „r r//",„ n„- ,,,,. r �;,uw,,rlr/ � / ,�/ ' I`P: ILmS a�3�i1��5, Nr, yrlrurthauc1ahpnwl ✓ ///// / '; ill �/�;,rrs. -/a-°--^� g duv ,,�7 a f�J Ir;� 'rl, I��r�3ann�nwurrn / y +r..!/,r,,, o" "�. rm,"^+ INk ,:udly '" r,' ,",I. ;. mow'. � %�j '"�,. / n� I' F ,., "� Wei ' .. ..rf Ip ,,r ,.. , ,: e s w wuDJ, rr�,r,"" ///, ..✓<r ��: v, / b" ,, ,�� rlsrlmciCharrrwhnovs m o wpm„N.,r �k Y� �''��"urlha �,,,pl v„r , n a, ✓ f�/r/ �%r,� � � r 1a ll I Ih1" yy a, ryr 1 /6// II Ilii I r r- , r � ✓ Ike r/ ��/ „�� I/;,, / ,, �,c " ftlfasiInrr.�IL�u� LEGEND r � r„�/ I �« l ��% ✓ram > /� .r , i //�� / � �� ly.r �� If�lYvrl�i ll",,, ".'.r ,,.vlr✓.' s: ..,w.,„ ,N q.wn�aN�, r I �!� . . � �I Irr ',,:,„ �"u ��„ �➢"/1¢YY/r „„ r/o rr///�///;`,ur v1�*r i,'/%�riror,r 9%/%r,' rirrro rl � /I��J �e�� ,,%%�wr/�, ly�i/9Pli"%� ,;„ ✓i��i .<rp,,,;�%r„ r �r ,,�///1//�//�., Noise contours + IIlmsfftklClornal OthemEFeatuflcys, I;.a ILiNL Minli-ig, Prrleuarn,:and Gas Land ConiMUnity Faicifity 70 DPrIL Oyr7err Space �~�~'r IHea4thcare Facility C3, 7:5 LYIJL Pumtstic/Sernt IPUblie House of'h rship�o on-Cryr�patimVe Land U %s Recreational areas R/ e,creuanall Facility EV Res denttal-aanggie Fammity Res ntlal-Sungle F'amil°y szl7reolOa?y Care Residential-MlUlti-FarniOy Residential' Mobile Rona Nr Florida Keys Overseas 10 Tranuent,Llo bging R,e denfial-MuN&Fatrityv " Paddling Trail(FKOPT) c@ Cnstrekm fional Transient ILodginrg Flofirta,Keys Oversews / r terltam e Traull FKHT L"r�m;� atltu1e Land Use l�rr;cWla,��atul "� �, /, / /�l1// �//✓I. // /,rr u Airport Y�m�ksnrlaI � ncumltu!urai Vacant r / r I:II fiidustnal 4110 �� mmelr�l�IkICe Cty at K,e y4est Boundary Monroe County Branwlmdar rwwnuu�:' °i�uu �luacnm� rill ca / x rC it /ra rr rr r/p /i r �:�,eyri r r r r rr r 1,r/ a %jam%/ r,.�r ," -1Fa�ed nl'•rw1111�Ir4vir wtuGlyu I�wl�`r,nr�,„/ / /„ ✓r rrrr rr,rur;,. ,/Ap i�✓r /irsnr�,,;r� r„r;a/// O/��ai r//�!/��//i/i//f//l i�////%��/flr ��/%/ . ia 1 � /i,�/ri ro 1 ociir,? ' ric„/ /i „//` r tr/�/lr �/,////�r�/,,// �/��lrrr�/,,,/„ri��/,i,,, ///a/� %��,rl/,/iii �„///,v,/s�%i„�,,,� ,,,i%//,'�,%,,,,�ii, / ✓,i%, 2028 Future Condition Noise Exposure Map r , r II II SIO/I yr or- r W /..r' /% ,/ ,..� %.,,, H,,: f„a ,r 1, ,..,�u, w ,r ,,,,. �,r...:q,rr "/I/� Lff AGrw n P�iC AM,NI w 5f, PI, S St lBedes,Villa 0 4 tslw N2 �r r' ��'r ,��/�° �, w, ° r,,, h•,, �v'e/////fro �r�mrks '9N""'S �ea R� b a "A rI j ME w/ LEGEND Contours "nstilLftional Other Features, r;%I r I��,JJ/�ll��JG�NyOu; ' / r ,.. y r/7�'//��/ �� ///j/r/�/ r 5 DIAL Mining,,Petol�eurn,and Gas ILarld Coninhinity Facilit��/ 1 a 1 M, ! �i/ fi�JJ��a/// .. !I i/pia;..� � � d y 0!DIAL Open Space Heaftheare Facility C3, 75 IDIJL PublidSenni-Public House of'Woffship Ron-Compaitible Land Use Recrea6onal Areas (*1 Recreational�Facifty c@ Residental-Single FaniilV Resrfdenftal-Single Family SchoofOay Care dr Residental-Miuld-Farnilly Residential-Mobile Honle, Florida Keys Overseas a Transient I-Gdgiing Resi'denli al-Wfib-f=amity Padd�linig Trail(IFKOPT) dr ihstitubonal Trans�ent Lodgvng Florida Keys Overseas Compatible Land Use Heritage T:rad(FKGHT) „� o/ / „r///Hi� / �l/�r/„r Agricultural Vacant Airport Boundary custrial Commercial(Office C-Ity of Keq petit Boundary Monroe County Baunowy Changes Between 2022 and 2028 NEMs n r r ��i ,,.j�r �r%'vr � ), ,�% r�ruww'"r I�,,,r�� '4 V � ,ny✓w ,a mpr � ��I 'I, r,. 6 ,% 'l d r II J1 I �, I llti 111 dl / 1�." i.. V� .I! ♦p,a // �/r,. �'m"r &N s a�' �,:.il.� ./ ii JII : �: /I 1 1 I Ili�l�l llVlu (S' e IV � J, r , „ae ,, ,, r . k!u „k�, i_r ,� 1. r .r/ ,/ i,., ,... �r f r li, .Cmi ,o,,,�. r, m„ //.,. row'I'r io ,,:�..:,.h;!9. "�" ,.»✓c. ,w:w..rrr �r„ r ,,,,,:: � r rl„c :✓, . . Ilw,< rw,:- _../ a,:wJm , ,r err ri r l'il/-;?,. f ; yr,„//) U,u k,, r �7/ Id -n„rv'.W, N ,.'wV x� 71,. ,r" t ;r,rw✓'v� / ll,//1�'r xl YIV I:". �a ro r Y ,r _ r r � . ,b r/iiufirt _ r6 ar / a- r, r r i r ' �r rtrm .IL a ,��IIII I . d n� n 1�arAil�E�+m Ian � rr o!� Ext��s;iVo-esa wdw r I I " 'ilf / IIIIIII !r, r r 1 r / r r 1 � n n � r r � r � I/ Ili liu III I /�,/ -.r � � i � ,, i r / � rrr „� w ,;,,, „ r'r 1 ,✓ � � Re�redoe�n��r Clw��+ �,. r r,,r � � �fir° ,/ � r � ,�� ,...,; ri/ ,� r.✓ii//// r r �rrrr l//rU/eir�:./i/rari i, r., , „ r .� :,t,,..... ,..,, rss /� l 1 we Wiest � / /// ,� v�✓/o r/��rr �/%ll�////i/i� �� LEGEND �:F2�2, ry Existing Cc,rfl-dttlen Mtmnlmg;Petroleum,and Gas.Lid"td Other Features , L.etaCour Open Space C-orrarm7wlrri't�V IFactllk,Y 21028 FUWr'e Condw'tion e v' IPuI��ilr,r,Penmt-�F�IukzGi rr / 6F ONL Noise Contour �r Healthcare Frarility Feclreakloonmd AreasNon-Compailibie Land Use Houset��f''n�"arsd�ei F esllc�e tatmall-rou eagle Family k EV Residential `riia�i8le�IFermmllhy + ? ReslreaEmor,al Facilkl EVP esidermdall-MYioble F c,.mes nchorjPDay Care I�e,�id�imCi:al h%o�ullki-Fan7il�r a esidenball-Nahmfltu-Falnal eor �D�� Flda keys w�er w�;M TTsalrrslrelnt Lodging Trasl ie t Lod'gra:7,g r'w, Paddling Trail(FKOPF�N Imrskl�rtkiQmrsail ALmcpasslfte�I r i Fl�rrda Keys C�velrseaM Compatible Land Use -w Heritage Traflll(FK,C)HA, rrrr///��//,.r�,//��i�/ii��/%r,,/%%�//,,�,✓///r��1//✓/%/ r,�/////�%/%i/�///,/r%/�%�r%/,i,r r,r�/r/ irp%al/, i, : �r Imcalt� ll " Canin�r�aa# ��iee U.k r orC Boundary Irdustxa I L it �tKe:" �e.tBat:ltds IInsCI��uRr4lnzal County, �u n; r /„�//, /� ,../ �ie// � /✓��r ..n/%rrr /,o,//// o/%/��/ar // ///„r/// r,,," Immua(00( kMupu�P ��rr I urrru oo /p/(..raf rr/lrr rrrr 1 rr'..11 r /ar /i-:rlr rr rcni/rtG%%or rao>a ;rY oir ! rr r ror / r;:.//'e/"�///"1 "' ^unm rvruvub w:m I'�ym�Puou:r r r -r ,l r / ✓rU Ir r :ri p i ,�,,,rY1��//l///��, �,;. p" 7::w:nm _mro uuW uir mVl was o i,.,..rnrrr n,,,ir rvrr„r. /ei.,,�,w. ,,. ✓airi�a,�i.. ,. rr,r, ;"r r..r /. r.., .r. / � ,,.:. ", Changes Between 2022 n 2028 EMs"S and N KeyWest International Airport • The area within the 2028 Future Condition noise contours increased in size by 29.9 acres or approximately 6.6%. • This increase can be attributed to the increase in aircraft operations. • Contours shifted to the west, which can be attributed to the relocation of Taxiway B to the end of the pavement. As a result, all aircraft departing on Runway 09 begin their takeoff roll at the end of the pavement. • The 2028 Future Condition NEM encompasses 30 more acres of noncompatible land when compared to the 2022 Existing Condition NEM. • The total number of housing units and population within the DNL 65 dB noise contour increases by approximately 23 percent. Existing Condition Most Recent 12 Months V901g,"It"If F j/11 �P e A ///,P rm a i0, f eN' ,01 v9), Or jjjql�,� u/&""///I;, W", R, h z4i-, 0 ,li, 6 dB D r/ rileAR" 0/ /,, r,l IlrY;r„ Obp,"� �✓N.r� u, d P Y ��/„ � c J N r /// ; 1 ; � r/ .26 dB DNL -0.11 dB DNL r r//, iic ,n 1,,/ // ///i/, /// Y,,,/........Jfl 'g/Na U1,100, jl//fi, ",, ,..,. I :".,.G aria.r,2irrrr r ,rrr,..,, ,/... / � // �/,////�/JJl I, , VI e ,.. r� .,, // � „„rr,,,, air„d-o,,; -... ,/, ,r �/ // /o J Ajv 1 ll //, / r /, r .,., /r / ro I I � All // Chang es Between Existing Condition N EM (Oct 2020 — Sept 2021 ) and Most Recent 12 Months (Oct 2021 — Sep t 2022 ) Noise ExposureMaps and Supporting Documentation KeyWest Remaining Steps International Airrt. 1 . The draft document was provided to the BOCC for review, ratification, and approval at their meeting on November 15, 2022. 2. The BOCC is being asked to approve submittal of the NEM document to the FAA for their review and compliance determination. 3. If approved by the BOCC, the final draft document will be submitted to the FAA following the BOCC meeting. 4. The FAA will acknowledge receipt of the document and, following their review, indicate whether it is in compliance with applicable requirements. If so, the FAA will publish a Notice of Compliance in the Federal Register. 5. FAA's formal acceptance of the NEMs allows EYW to remain eligible for federal funding for the Noise Insulation Program. Proposed Program Area for Future Noise Insulation Program M 'To ome C4 aryme . .r Y.., q xe 9 � L°utheran W Y Church& School 41 pp �j 1 �ar Catholic Charities Peace Covenant' ell ur e 7 i LEGEND Proposed Program Area 4 J Previous NIP Participants ---- ----- -- [J Airport Boundary Parcel Boundary : Future Condition 65 DIN L Noise Contour DRAFT DOCUMENT - SUBJECT TO REVISION 70 DIN Noise Contour 75 DIN Noise Contour ri -Feet < L ag(ykEr A ss<� L,, LC Deborah Lagos Aviation Noise Consultant EYW Airport Noise Program Coordinator deborah . mu r ............. .........................................................................................................................................................................phy. la�osC�...........�m a..... ................................................................................ il .com 727-631-1553