2022-03A NEM Update, 1st Supplement 03/20/2023 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effective Date U on Execution Task Order No. 2022 - 03A
Client Project No. 404-630202-FAA#37-61 Engineer Project No. E9Y37976
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February , 2022 ("Agreement"). The
Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized—NEM Update—Supplemental#1 - TimeExtension
Time Extension of 548 calendar days
Pricing
N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
X Firm Fixed Price of$ (No additional f indinLa) 7,�6�POE COLRM A�,r�INS -
N/A Other(Describe):
PED
Schedule
AS a,rUN
Services may commence on taa 3/17/23
Y 1�� ec��tio��
Services will cease by 913 days (365 days o1°l vial executed+548 da l
Recommended by: Approved by:
m
y.
irector of Ai � Administrator '
rports 3.16 2023 st. nt _. ate' 03.20.2023
CONSULTANT: JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
E, n04 {�7 by Jac,..lm
Jacqueline .
„paRuaa,c-�5,o
ae aG Director
Witness „Nlu��� artnw rG�a,.wlaulpim Title
File: MSTR APS—Monroe County
Page 1 of 1
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effective Date �M Task Order No. 2022 -03
Client Project No. 404-630202 Engineer Project No. E9Y37976
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 24, 2022 ("Agreement"). The
Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized-NEM Update-•-Supplemental#1
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 1 page(s).
Pricing
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,IV/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
.,.,X .,,,,,,,,,,. Firm Fixed Price of$ 3.2..4.1$w Q ,,,,,
,"—..N/A . - Other(Describe):
NROE comes ATmn,NEY
Schedule Arcivrioa
Services may commence on Execution BEd �1oa-...._-,
Services will cease by 1'lssesr�l u"'TY Ar� RNr:v
3,6,S,,,wdays_ Date 3/7/22
Recommended by: Approved by:
Director of Airport Date: 3.7.2022 Asst./County Administrator Date: 03.07.2022
CONSULTANT:
PROJECTJACOBS ENT CO
Jeffrey Mill idly signed by Jeffrey D.Acton
D. DN:cn=Jeffrey D.Aaon,o=Jacobs
OWN,oo,
II=k Acton@Jacobs.coni,c,US
Jacqueline a ® o y _ We,
WitnesS...w... _. ROS$......._ � aals.asana ones.. ,... Title x� Mion IL11WC . ��.�"�ce ���"�,�Wu ���'��e
File: MSTR APS Monroe County
Page 1 of 1
Exhibit A (2022 -03)
Scope of Services
Monroe County Airports
Key West International Airport
NEM Update -Supplemental#1
SCOPE OF WORK
Jacobs Project Management Company will provide the services as outlined in the Fee schedule and in
Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,Inc's. Scope of Services and Fee Schedule.
Assumptions/Design Parameters
1. All work will be performed pursuant to the Master Agreement for Professional Services between
Jacobs Project Management Co. and Monroe County,FL agreement signed between the parties on
February 16,2022.
Page 1 of 1
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key West International Airport
Project:
NEM Update-Supplemental#1(2022-03)
FEE SUMMARY
BASIC SERVICES
,Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT
Article A:NEM Update-Supplemental#1 18 $ 2,896
Total Basic Services Lump Sum Fee $ 2,896 $ -
SPECIAL SERVICES Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT
Article A:NEM Update-Supplemental#1
Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,Inc. $ 29,522 $ 29,522
Total S octal Services Lum Sum Fee $ 29,622 $ Y9,622
TOTAL LUMP SUM PROJECT FEE 18 $ 32,418 $ 29,622
DBE Percentage 91.07%
Page 1 of 2
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
TITLE 14 CFR PART 150
NEM UPDATE
OUT-OF-SCOPE OF SERVICES
20-JANUARY-2022
BACKGROUND: The original Scope of Services and associated Fee were developed in
November 2019 for preparation of the FAA Grant Pre-Application and finalized in May 2020 for
the FY'20 Grant Application that was submitted to the FAA in June 2020 (i.e., Pre-COVID). FAA
Grant#3-12-0037-061-2020 and Jacobs Project Management Co.'s Task Order No. 12/15-76 for
the preparation of Noise Exposure Map Update were approved during the BOCC meeting on
September 16, 2020.
TASK 1 INVENTORY OF AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
Task 3.1, Update Aircraft Operational Data, of the Scope of Services states, "The Consultant has
recently prepared noise contours for the Master Plan Update and Environmental Assessment,
therefore this task will commence with a review and validation of the data used for the most recent
noise contours. This review will allow the Consultant to determine what existing data may no
longer be valid and will assist the Consultant in determining which sources would provide the
most accurate and verifiable data." The Scope indicated that aviation related data would be
obtained from various sources including: ATCT, EYW Passenger and Cargo Landing Reports,
EYW Passenger Airline Schedules, and FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (ATADS) for
formulation of the Existing Condition NEM and the Forecast of Aircraft Operations from the EYW
Master Plan Update, FAA's Terminal Area Forecast(TAF), and the FASP Forecast for the Future
Condition NEM. At the time the Scope was written, it was assumed that the Existing Condition
year would be CY2020, and the Future Condition year would be 2026.
FlightRadar24 data was purchased for CY 2020 at a cost of€l500 ($1,821.90) on February 11,
2021. At the time the original Scope of Services and Fee were prepared, the Consultant was
unaware that FlightRadar24 had installed an ASD-B receiver at EYW, and operations data would
be available. Therefore, the cost of purchasing data from FlightRadar24 was not included in the
original Fee. However, the cost of acquiring this initial dataset was offset because a trip to EYW
to collect data, which was included in the original Scope and Fee, was no longer necessary.
After obtaining the FlightRadar24 dataset for CY 2020, it was determined that significant
programming in Microsoft Excel VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) would be necessary to
process the data acquired from FlightRadar24. This effort was not included in the original Scope
and Fee. A total of 100 hours were expended on this task, at a cost of$10,000.00.
On June 1, 2021, a letter was submitted to the FAA suggesting that historical operations occurring
during the height of the pandemic were an anomaly, would not accurately reflect the level of
aircraft operations that would have taken place if not for the impact of the worldwide pandemic,
and should not be used for the development of the Existing Condition NEM. The letter proposed
Page 1 of 4
NEM Update Out-of-Scope Services
the use of FY 2021 aircraft operations for use in the development of the Existing Condition
including analyses to determine fleet mix, runway utilization, flight track utilization, and day/night
split. The letter further proposed the use of FY 2027 aircraft operations as specified in the FAA
TAF dated May 2021, the fleet mix information developed for the recent EA, and the runway
utilization, flight track utilization, and day/night split developed for the Existing Condition be used
for the development of the Future Condition.
On June 21, 2021, the FAA informed EYW that the 2020 TAF (dated May 2021) had been
removed from the FAA's website and therefore, the forecasted level of aviation activity for the
Future Year NEM should not be based on or reference this TAF.
On July 14, the FAA informed EYW that the 2020 TAF was reposted on the FAA's website and
was available for use in developing the Future Condition NEM. They further informed EYW that:
• The FAA does not object to the County's proposal to use actual aircraft operations data
for Fiscal Year 2021 to prepare the Existing Condition NEM.
• The County proposes to obtain FY 2021 aircraft operations data for the Existing Condition
study year from a commercial vendor. When this data collection is completed, the
information should be compared with data collected by the FAA for the same period to
identify any notable differences that should be addressed.
• Although the County has pointed out recent and continued growth in passenger service
and aircraft activity at EYW, the County proposes to use the same AEDT noise model
settings and inputs from the recent EA to develop the NEMs. FAA disagrees with this
approach. The AEDT model's settings, assumptions, and inputs should be reviewed and
updated, as necessary,to ensure they reflect current and projected conditions for the Part
150 NEMs.
On July 15, 2021, the FAA suggested that use of the fleet mix developed for the EA may not be
appropriate for use in the NEM Update because it was developed pre-COVID, and new airlines
are (or will soon be) serving EYW that were unknown at the time the fleet mix was developed for
the EA. The FAA suggested reviewing the recently developed Draft PFC 21-19 Application and
the Cat Ex project description for Concourse A, as well as any additional information EYW could
provide regarding new airline service.
In order to develop an accurate fleet mix for FY'21, data for the remainder of FY 2021 (Jan. 1 —
Sept. 30, 2021) was requested from FlightRadar24. Because time was of the essence, it was
requested that the available data(Jan—June)be provided as soon as possible, and the remaining
months be provided as soon as it was available, so processing could proceed. Obtaining the data
in this manner was more costly because the cost for a one-off data set for Jan-June was€l500,
then €500 for each recurring delivery (July, Aug., Sept.) under the same data agreement. The
total cost for Jan. —Sept. was€3000 ($3,522.90).
The FAA requested a letter briefly outlining the use of the current data collection for Existing
Conditions and the 2020 TAF for future conditions. The FAA would like to provide a letter of
approval for inclusion in the report's appendix. A letter was prepared and transmitted to the FAA
on September 28, 2021.
Page 2 of 4
NEM Update Out-of-Scope Services
Information was presented to the Ad-Hoc Committee during their regular meeting on December
7, 2021, regarding development of the fleet mix and number of operations for the Existing
Condition. At least one member of the committee expressed concern regarding the methodology
and the data sets that were being used. The FAA requested a memo describing the data sets and
methodology. Subsequently, the FAA recommended revising the methodology(or the description
of the methodology) to make it more acceptable to the committee and the public. This required
additional analysis to resolve disagreement between the two primary data sets that was causing
the concern expressed at the Ad-Hoc Committee meeting. A final memo describing the revised
methodology is currently being prepared. This effort was not included in the original Scope and
Fee. A total of 40 hours were expended on this task, at a cost of$4,000.00.
The total amount requested for Task 1 is $17,522.90.
TASK 2 DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOM DEPARTURE PROFILES
After reviewing the minutes of the June 1st Ad-Hoc Committee meeting, on September 28, 2021,
the FAA requested additional information on the 2,000-foot hold down on departures,stating,"The
handling of aircraft arrivals and departures in the vicinity of EYW by the Navy (e.g., 2,000-foot
hold down on departures) presents a known and unique operating condition that should be
incorporated into the AEDT model. If there is reason not to include it in the model and instead use
standard profiles, that will need to be reviewed and approved by FAA." Limited documentation
was provided to the FAA but was deemed insufficient to make a determination.
On September 29 the FAA stated, "the proposal to not include known and active aircraft handling
procedures in the development of the NEMs will require FAA approval."A formal request should
be submitted, along with any supporting documentation and justification, and the proposal will be
coordinated with HQ.
The FAA requested more information on the 2,000-foot hold down on departures, stating this may
include, but not necessarily limited to, a more detailed comparison of the AEDT standard profile
and the departure procedures in place. This will help the FAA take a closer look to determine if
the standard departure profiles can be used or if custom departure profiles are necessary. It will
also serve to document the decision on whether or not to develop custom profiles. The note
referenced from the AEDT manual ("The use of radar-based trajectory data alone to estimate an
aircraft's takeoff weight is not recommended.") may not fully address the issue or determine if
custom profiles are necessary.
A screening analysis was conducted to determine how often EYW departures on Runway 09 were
held down. FlightRadar24 trajectory data from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021,
were analyzed for each of the following, most frequently used, commercial aircraft types: A319
Stage Length 2, EMB-175 Stage Length 2, and ATR46 Stage Length 1. The results of this
screening analysis revealed that less than 20% of departures are held down to 2,000 feet AMSL.
Consequently, the majority of departures can be modeled using the standard profiles, and a few
should be modeled using user-defined profiles.
A letter was prepared documenting the results of the initial screening analysis and proposing an
expanded screening analysis The results of this expanded screening analysis will determine the
Page 3 of 4
NEM Update Out-of-Scope Services
AEDT aircraft types for which user-defined profiles will be developed to model the level segment
at 2,000 feet AMSL. The letter was transmitted to the FAA on October 26, 2021. The FAA
scheduled a conference call to discuss options for modeling the 2,000-ft hold down for November
18, 2021. During this conference call it was determined that development of custom departure
profiles would not be necessary, but the analysis that led to this determination must be clearly
documented in a technical appendix within the NEM document.
The Scope of Services states, "AEDT default database aircraft and departure and approach
profiles will be used to model existing aircraft operations at EYW." Therefore, analysis of unique
aircraft handling procedures and custom departure profiles represents an out-of-scope effort that
must be addressed in a supplemental agreement.
A total of 80 hours have been expended on this task, at a cost of $12,000.00. This is the total
amount requested for Task 2.
The total amount requested for out-of-scope services for the NEM Update is $29,522.90.
Page 4 of 4