Loading...
12/15-78A Tree Clearing & Mitigation MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER FORM Effective Date Upon Execution Task Order No. 12/15-78A Client Project No. 403-635201-FAA 44-36 Engineer Project No. E9Y37978 This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida("Client") and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 16, 2022 ' ("Agreement"). The Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. Services Authorized—Tree Clearing and Mitigation—Design and Permitting—Florida Keys Marathon International Airport(Time Extension) Time extension of 200 calendar days Pricing N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement,. X Firm Fixed Price of$ No Additional-Funding). N/A Other(Describe): Schedule Services may commence on Execution Services will cease by 1.295 da s 1,095 da s om°i. � al eecttted200 cla Approved: Approved: ., 07/10/2023 Executive Director of Airports 7.7.2023 Countyministrator CONSULTANT: JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO Jacqu'y Digitally signed by Jacquellne Ross B eline DN:cn=Jacquellne Ross,-US, By_ a Jacobs Englneedn9, BOSSemail=Jacquellne ross@Jacoba com Witness Dale:2023.07.07 09:21:53-04'00' Title Director DS COUNTY A File:MSTR APS—Monroe County iG11L FORMI Page 1 of 1 maw � " , PSIS00 J A ASSIST COUNTY A. t Date 7/10/23 (4) Kevin Madok, CPA Clerk of the Circuit Court&Comptroller—Monroe County, Florida DATE: September 17, 2020 TO: Beth I,eto,Airports Business Manager FROM: Pamela G. Ha,nc C. SUBJECT: September 16' BOCC Meeting Attached is an electronic copy of die following item for your handling: C8 Jacobs Project Management.Co.'s Task Order No.12/15-78 in (lie amourit ❑f' $701,615.00 for perinitting and design and bidding support documents for tree clearing and mitigation for the required tree removal to support the slrifl of Runway 7/25 centerline 40' to the northwest to meet applicable ruriway-t.o-taxiway separation slandards at llie Florida Keys Mau-atlron International Airport; die task order %ill be funded 1(03 6 by FAA Grant.44-36. Should you liave any questions please [eel free to contact me at (305) 292-3550. cc: County Attorney Finance rile KEY WEST MARATHON PLANTATION KEY PKIROTH BUILDING 500 Whitehead Street 3117 Overseas Highway 98820 Overseas Highway 50 High Point Road Key West,Florida 33040 Marathon,Florida 33050 Plantation Key,Florida 33070 Plantation Key,Florida 33070 305-294-4641 305-289-6027 305-852-7145 305-852-7145 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER FORM Effective Date Upon EXeution Task Order No. 12/1548 Client Project No. 403-635201-GAMA82 Engineer Project Nv This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master i Agreement for Professional Services"between Monroe County,Florida("Client'")and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO.("Consultant"],dated February 15,2017("Agreement"). The Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. Services Authorized--Permitting and Resign-Tree Clearing and Mltigntlas Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and consists of 1_page(s). Pricing NIA Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement. �X _ Firm Fixed price of$ 701.b 15.04 1 Other(Describe): cn �. r-s� Schedule rvices may commence on ExMtion 'ces will cease by 1,095 a-s . ) 130ARD OF COUNTY COMMFfiSIONEE* ST: KEVIN MADOK,CLERIC OF MONROE C FLORIDA c' 4 As Deputy Clerk By M rlCh i CONSULTANT: .IAeio AIMACEM>er�rr CO IM o •r• .a�r i.w.R... B Jackie , „ ,;,; Witness Ross tvtvaec.us�ai- TiCM Svcs.Group Lender E GDU oFNE File: WTR,lPS-Alonros County ��r, Page I of I ASS STAhT,. tlNTY A 7-a Date Exhibit A—(12/16 -78) Scope of Services Monroe County Airports The Florida Keys Marathon International Airport Permitting and Design—Tree Clearing and Mitigation BACKGROUND On March 30,2020 the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)issued a Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision(FONSI/ROD)in response to the Environmental Assessment that was submitted to shift the Runway 7-25 centerline 40 feet to the northwest to meet applicable runway-to-taxiway separation standards at The Florida Keys Marathon International Airport(MTH). FAA's approval provided in the FONSI/ROD is contingent upon completing the following: 1. Conclusion of FAA's consultation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service and the County's implementation of any mitigation or conservation measures deemed necessary during the consultation process. Until such time that consultation is concluded and conservation measures are implemented,Monroe County shall not alter or affect vegetation and habitat associated with the Stock Island tree snail and the Simpson's tree cactus. 2. The County demonstrating the project's consistency with local comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances,and/or land use plans and obtaining all necessary local approvals. Until such time that consistency is demonstrated,and approvals are obtained,Monroe County shall not alter or affect the existing tropical hardwood hammock along Aviation Boulevard that serves as a buffer between the airport and the residences to the north. Likewise, construction on the runway cannot be initiated until consistency is demonstrated. 3. Completion of the FAA's risk determination of the Runway Protection Zone(RPZ)and the County implementing appropriate measures,as needed,to satisfy RPZ land use guidelines. SCOPE OF WORK Jacobs will provide project management,coordination services,design,permitting,and bidding support services to complete the above noted items as required by the FAA and to develop bidding documents for the required tree removal to support the shift of the Runway 7-25 centerline 40' to the northwest. DESCRIPTION OF WORK This project is made up of two distinct elements. 1. Permitting and the completion of the FONSI/ROD contingent items. This work includes the following items: a. USACE Nationwide Permit Application. b. Prepare Wetlands and Protected Species Mitigation Plans for: Page 1 of 17 i. Wetlands ii. Tropical Hardwood Hammock iii. Stock Island Tree Snail iv. Simpson's Apple Cactus c. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service Section 7 Consultation d. Monroe County- Conditional Use Development Permit. e. Revisions to the Current Monroe County Comprehensive Plan related to specific habitat requirements and tree buffers at MTH. f. RPZ Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Study. The purpose of the Study is to evaluate potential alternatives that would avoid or minimize the encroachment of the Runway 7 Departure RPZ and Runway 25 Arrival RPZ. 2. Development of Contract/Bid Documents for: a. Clearing and Selective Clearing of Trees and Vegetation to Accommodate the Future Shift of the Runway 7-25 Centerline 40' to the northwest. b. Creation of Wetlands to Serve as Mitigation General Scone For this scope of services,Jacobs will provide the following services: 1. Management of the project from data collection,permitting,consultations,design,bid opening, and award of the construction contract. 2. Coordination with subconsultants. 3. Coordination with Monroe County,DOA,FAA/FDOT as required. 4. Preparation of minutes of meetings and phone conversations. 5. Program verification and site investigations. 6. Preparation of the construction documents and incorporation of Monroe County's front- end contract documents. 7. Preparation of the engineering report,construction cost estimate, and construction schedule. 8. Bidding and award assistance. Assumptions/Design Parameters 1. This project is eligible for AIP funding. 2. Acquisition of topographic survey will be performed in accordance with the accuracies as outlined in FAA AC 150/5300-18B. 3. Jacobs will develop plans,an outline of specifications,an engineering report,and a construction cost estimate at the 30%design level for review. 4. Jacobs will develop plans,technical specifications,an engineering report, and a construction cost estimate at the 90%and Final design level for review. Jacobs will develop the CSPP and 7460 to be submitted to the Airport and FAA for review. 5. Jacobs will produce a final contract set of plans,specifications,engineering report, construction schedule,and construction cost estimate for bidding purposes. 6. This project does not include the design nor implementation of obstruction lighting. 7. This project does not include the design to modify,relocate,nor erect aircraft hangar structures. Page 2of17 8. It is assumed any trees that are penetrations to the Part 7:1 transition surfaces will be allowed to remain in place and will not require any trimming. 9. SFWMD permitting for drainage will be for a conceptual permit only. 10. Required compensatory wetland mitigation will be provided at the site evaluated as part of the EA. 11. This proposal does not include the permit application costs nor fees. These shall be paid for by Monroe County. 12. The Jacobs Team cannot guarantee that a permit will be issued or a timeframe in which permits are issued. 13. Post permitting and mitigation implementation efforts are not included. Implementation of mitigation plans and/or mitigation payments as may be required are not included in this permitting scope. 14. It is assumed the County will provide tropical hardwood hammock impact data if formal consultation is needed for the Stock Island Tree Snail. 15. Tree survey and mangrove trimming permit for the mangroves at the ends of the runway to be provided by others during construction. 16. Legal support required for financial assurance or conservation easement matters for mitigation areas will be provided by the County. 17. This scope of work does not include any cultural resource/archeology support. 18. This proposal assumes the location of mitigation area as identified previously in the EA is sufficient for permitting. 19. It is assumed that additional alternatives analysis,than what was already noted in the EA,will not be required by the USACE for a Standard/Individual permit. 20. Aircraft operational data will be obtained from the FAA. 21. The future aircraft fleet mix projections for MTH will be extrapolated to reflect the annual average growth rates and aircraft fleet mix assumptions associated with the current Airport Master Plan Forecast for MTH. 22. Based aircraft fleet mix data to be obtained from Monroe County DOA records. 23. This project does not include the assessment of instrument approach or departure procedures. 24. This project does not include Aircraft take-off runway length analyses nor payload/range analyses (aircraft performance evaluations would be limited to landing distance calculations only). 25. This project does not include activity forecasting nor Airport Layout Plan modifications. 26. This project does not include financial feasibility analyses, benefit-cost analyses, return on investment nor payback period estimations. 27. This scope of work does not include construction administration,resident project representative nor quality assurance testing. These services will be provided under a separate purchase order. 28. Jacobs will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, and completeness of the information/data provided by the Client or other third parties. 29. In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses,economic feasibility projections,for the project,Jacobs has no control over cost or price of labor and materials;unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions;time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third parties;and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or schedule.Therefore,Jacobs makes no warranty that Client's actual project costs,financial aspects,economic feasibility,will not vary from Jacobs' opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. Page 3 of 17 30. In soils,foundation,groundwater,and other subsurface investigations,the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations,exploration,and investigations have been made.Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect total project cost and/or execution.These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of Jacobs. 31. Jacobs shall at no time take title, risk of loss or ownership of the hazardous materials or wastes. Client recognizes that Jacobs assumes no risk and/or liability for hazardous materials encountered while performing any services associated with such hazardous waste. ARTICLE A—DATA COLLECTION Data Collection: 1. Prepare for and attend project design kick off meeting. 2. Coordinate with subconsultants. 3. Perform a detailed survey for the following elements as depicted in Attachments 1 and 2: • Survey Wetland Flagging • Survey Runway Edge of Pavements and Stub Taxiway Profiles • Survey Existing North Tree Line • Survey 50' Grid between Runway Edge of Pavement and Tree Line • Survey 50' Grid at Mitigation Area 4. Perform walk through survey of the mitigation area to confirm topographical survey information. 5. Jacobs to provide full time escort for the survey crew when working on the airfield. It is assumed that the survey will take approximately 15 -8 hour shifts to complete. 6. Perform a geotechnical investigation to assess the existing condition of the proposed mitigation area. The investigation includes 4 four Standard Penetration Test borings to a depth of 10 feet below grade. 7. A follow up site visit to the site visit previously conducted in April 2017 for the Environmental Assessment(EA)and Biological Assessment(BA)will be performed in order to confirm the current ecological data necessary for the permit applications.Please note that the assessment in support of the EA and BA was performed prior to Hurricane Irma impacting the airport. Therefore, it is required that the data be re-evaluated for the permitting efforts. If site conditions are substantially different, additional survey may be required. (See Optional Tasks.). The following site surveys will be performed: • Update Wetland Impact Area Data Site review and data collection includes: o Review wetland limits as previously delineated and current site conditions, adjust wetland limits if needed. Page 4 of 17 o Prepare map of data points. o Coordinate with surveyor to ensure data points are surveyed appropriately o Complete the regional data forms for the USACE wetland delineation. o Record habitat type, quality, and vegetative species for use in the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology(UMAM)analysis and permit applications. • Update Mitigation Site Survey o Review wetland limits as previously delineated and current site conditions;adjust wetlands limits if needed. o Prepare map of data points o Coordinate with surveyor to ensure data points are surveyed appropriately o Record habitat type, quality, and vegetative species for use in the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology(UMAM)analysis and permit applications. • Update General Protected Species Surveys o Conduct general site review to update or confirm current site conditions relative to protected species and add any new observations. • Update Tropical Hardwood Hammock Survey o The Jacobs Team will conduct a general site review of the tropical hardwood hammock habitat to be affected to confirm minimal change to site conditions relative to the site conditions during the vegetative species-specific survey previously prepared pursuant to Monroe County requirements. This will include a review of the area of the transects utilized for the previous survey to ensure that no significant changes occurred as a result of Hurricane Irma. During the review, any areas containing monocultures of Brazilian pepper will be mapped in the field based on coordination with the County. If site conditions are changed substantially such that the previous survey is likely to be invalid, a full survey is included as an Optional task. • Update Simpson's Apple Cactus Survey o The Jacobs team will conduct a re-survey of the transect in which this species was found in the previous tropical hardwood hammock survey to update estimated numbers of plants to be relocated and general locations of Simpson's Apple Cactus based on current conditions. If specific individuals of the Simpson's Apple Cactus are noted in field, we will mark locations using a hand-held GPS unit. 8. Stock Island Tree Snail Survey. The Jacobs team will conduct surveys for the Stock Island Tree Snail pursuant to USFWS"Stock Island Tree Snail Survey Protocol. A total of two(2) surveys will be conducted,one(1)in August and one(1) in September during rain events as required. Due to the specifics of the survey protocol associated with weather conditions; additional survey is as an Optional Task in case weather or other conditions change during site visit such that survey protocol is no longer met. Services for Article A will be provided under a lump sum basis. Page 5 of 17 ARTICLE B—PERMITTING AND RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 1. Prepare Wetlands and Protected Species Mitigation Plans Task LA Wetlands Mitigation Plan o Based on the updated site review, the mitigation area will be located to avoid existing mangroves where possible. An updated UMAM assessment of the proposed wetlands mitigation area will be prepared following the site visit. The Jacobs Team will coordinate with the design to prepare the wetlands mitigation plan. The Jacobs Team will provide a description of existing conditions within the mitigation area, along with a planting plan, and will provide construction details related to the excavation to support the creation of a wetlands.The mitigation plan will include also baseline information, a credit determination, a mitigation work plan, maintenance plan, performance standards, monitoring requirements, and long-term management. Financial assurance, conservation easements, and other related requirements are to be addressed during the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)Agency Coordination and USACE Permitting. Task 1.11 Tropical Hardwood Hammock Report/Mitigation Plan o The Jacobs Team will prepare a mitigation plan for clearing of the tropical hardwood hammock habitat in accordance with Monroe County requirements. The mitigation plan will include a table of all County protected species including the common name, scientific name, status of each species, and the number of each species based on a survey conducted in April 2017 and updated as needed based on work scheduled to be performed under Article A—Data Collection.It will also include a map of the general location of each species within the tropical hardwood hammock. o In addition, The Jacobs Team will coordinate with the County to identify appropriate mitigation measures,which will be included in the plan. Current plans assume payment into the County mitigation fund. However, if preferred, alternative mitigation to payment will be investigated under an Optional Task. Task LC Stock Island Tree Snail Report/Mitigation Plan o The Jacobs Team will provide a report detailing the results of the survey for the Stock Island Tree Snail to the USFWS in order to complete Section 7 Consultation. If Stock Island Tree Snails are identified on the project site during the surveys,the Jacobs Team will coordinate with Monroe County and USFWS to identify an area of appropriate habitat for relocation of the snails prior to construction and will inspect up to three(3)potential relocation sites. Task 1.1) Simpson's Apple Cactus Report/Relocation Plan o The Jacobs Team will prepare a relocation plan based on estimated number of individuals of the Simpson's Apple Cactus in coordination with Monroe County for submittal to USFWS following the updated site review. Coordination with USFWS is included to obtain approval of the relocation plan and conclusion of Section 7 consultation.The Jacobs Team will coordinate with Monroe County and USFWS to identify an area of appropriate habitat for relocation of the snails prior to construction and will inspect up to three(3)potential relocation sites. Page 6 of 17 2. SFWMM Permitting Task 2.A Environmental Resource Permit Application o Based on the proposed site review, if any changes in site conditions or wetlands jurisdiction warrant re-calculation of wetlands impacts, The Jacobs Team will update wetlands impact calculations, revise UMAM assessment if needed, and update maps if the wetlands jurisdictional line changes. The Jacobs Team will prepare the SFWMD permit application. Avoidance and minimization efforts will be summarized from the EA. Task 2.B SFWMD Agency Coordination o The Jacobs Team will coordinate and attend one pre-application meeting with SFWMD to discuss the proposed site plan and existing site conditions. Meeting notes following the pre-application will be prepared and distributed to the team.In addition, the Jacobs Team will attend one (1) site visit with SFWMD in order to review existing site conditions. The visit will include a verification of the wetland jurisdictional line and a review of the proposed Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) scoring to gain agency concurrence. A site visit to review the proposed mitigation area is also included. Task 2.0 Respond to SFWMD Requests for Additional Information (RAI) o The Jacobs Team will provide two(2)written responses to SFWMD requests for additional information(RAI)to clarify the application.If additional data collection or extensive revisions to the site plan are required to respond to the RAI,additional scope may be necessary. Task 2.1) SFWMD- Coordinate and Document Mitigation Legal and Financial Assurance Requirements— Wetlands Mitigation Plan o The Jacobs Team will coordinate with appropriate parties to confirm and document responses to legal and financial assurance requirements for agency acceptance of the wetlands mitigation plan. This task includes agency coordination. 3. USFWS Section 7 Consultation Task 3.A Revise Draft Biological Assessment o The Draft Biological Assessment(BA)will be revised to include species specific survey data for the Stock Island Tree Snail and updates as needed from the survey for the plans for the Stock Island Tree Snail and the Simpson's Apple Cactus. The Jacobs Team will finalize the BA upon USFWS and FAA concurrence. Task 3.B Agency Coordination/Consultation—Section 7 Informal Consultation o Agency and team coordination to obtain approval from FAA and USFWS as needed to address the Stock Island Tree Snail and Simpson's Apple Cactus. 4. USACE Permitting Task 4.A USACE Nation wide Permit Application Page 7 of 17 o The Jacobs Team will prepare the USACE Nationwide permit application. It is assumed Nationwide Permit 39 will be applicable based on anticipated wetland/surface water impacts less than '/a acre. Information prepared for the SFWMD application will be utilized to the greatest extent possible. Key items requiring additional information include existing conditions, onsite avoidance/minimization,and construction methods. In addition,the submittal will include a 12-Step mitigation plan based on 33 CFR 332.4. If the project does not qualify for a nationwide permit, an Individual/Standard Permit may be required (see Optional Tasks). Task 4.B USACE Agency Coordination o The Jacobs Team will coordinate and attend one pre-application meeting with the USACE to discuss the proposed site plan and existing site conditions. Meeting notes following the pre-application will be prepared and distributed to the team.In addition, the Jacobs Team will attend one(1)site visit with the USACE in order to review existing site conditions. The visit will include a verification of the wetland jurisdictional line and a review of the proposed Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) scoring to gain agency concurrence. During this site visit a review of the proposed mitigation area will be conducted. Task 4.0 Respond to USACE Requests for Additional Information(RAI) o The Jacobs Team will provide two (2) written responses to questions following submittal of the permit application. If additional data collection or extensive revisions to the site plan are required to respond to the questions,additional scope may be necessary. Task 4.D USACE - Coordinate and Document Mitigation Legal and Financial Assurance Requirements— Wetlands Mitigation Plan o The Jacobs Team will coordinate with appropriate parties to confirm and document responses to legal and financial assurance requirements for agency acceptance of the wetlands mitigation plan.This task includes agency coordination. 5. Monroe County Permitting Task 5.A Monroe County Permits/Approvals—Environmental Support o Per Monroe County Land Development Code, the Jacobs Team will prepare an Existing Conditions Report to accompany the County application. The report will include a description of the site including the distribution and quality of native habitats along with the results of the protected species surveys and associated maps. In addition, the report will include the tropical hardwood hammock mitigation plan prepared as part of Task I.B. Task 5.B Monroe County Coordination o The Jacobs Team will conduct a pre-application meeting with Monroe County environmental representatives. The Jacobs Team will attend one(1)site visit with Monroe County in order to review existing site conditions and proposed mitigation. Page 8 of 17 6. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Task 6.A Project Meetings,Administration & Coordination o This task includes attendance at County interdepartmental coordination meetings, submittal deadline coordination and overall contract management and administration for the duration of the contract period. One (1) on-site meeting is included in this task. Task 6.13 Comprehensive Plan Amendment o This task includes preparation, coordination and submittal of the required Comprehensive Plan text amendment application and supporting documents. A draft application package will be prepared for review and coordination with the County. A final application package will then be prepared based on any comments/feedback received during review of the draft documents. The final application package will be coordinated as needed during the review process until final approval is obtained. 7. Runway Protection Zone Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Runway 7-25 at the Florida Keys Marathon International Airport(MTH or the Airport) currently has a lateral separation of 200 feet from its full-length parallel Taxiway A. This separation is adequate to serve aircraft approach category B and airplane design group(ADG) I aircraft. However,the critical aircraft at MTH is the Cessna Citation 04,which is classified as ADG 11. Therefore,the Airport Reference Code(ARC)for MTH is B-11. Per the Federal Aviation Administration's(FAA)airfield design standards,the minimum runway to parallel taxiway separation for ARC B-II is 240 feet. To comply with the minimum runway to taxiway separation standards for ARC B-II at MTH,the relocation of Runway 7-25 by 40 feet to the northwest is proposed and depicted on the current Airport Layout Plan(ALP)drawing set that was developed during the recently completed Airport Master Plan Update. The proposed relocation of Runway 7-25 at MTH will also cause its associated runway design surfaces prescribed in FAA Advisory Circular(AC) 150/5300-13A(Change 1), Airport Design to be relocated. These surfaces include the runway safety area,object free area, obstacle free zone and runway protection zones(RPZs). The relocation of the Runway 25 arrival RPZ and Runway 7 departure RPZ would produce incompatible land uses, as three buildings would encroach the relocated RPZs. This includes two aircraft storage hangars (Buildings#28 and#29)and the Monroe County Public Works Building#26. The proposed relocation of Runway 7-25 would not cause incompatibility with the other runway design surfaces prescribed in AC 150/5300-13A. An Environmental Assessment(EA)was prepared for the proposed relocation of Runway 7- 25 at MTH. On March 30,2020,the FAA issued its Record of Decision(ROD)with a Finding of No Significant Impacts(FONSI). Upon issuing ROD/FONSI,the FAA advised the Monroe County Department of Airports(DOA)that"the approval included in the ROD/FONSI is contingent on the completion of the FAA's Risk Determination on the RPZ and the County implementing appropriate measures, as needed,to satisfy RPZ land use guidelines." Page 9 of 17 To support the FAA's Risk Determination,the DOA has requested the services of the Jacobs team to conduct an RPZ Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Study(the Study).The purpose of the Study is to evaluate potential alternatives that would avoid or minimize the encroachment of the Runway 7 Departure RPZ and Runway 25 Arrival RPZ. This will include the identification and evaluation of RPZ encroachment mitigation alternatives. These alternatives would be developed consistent with the Interim Guidance on Land Uses Within a Runway Protection Zone that was published by FAA on September 27,2012. The Study will be led by Jacob's subconsultant,Ricondo&Associates,Inc.(Ricondo)with Jacobs Engineering(Jacobs)supporting the engineering analyses and preparation of rough order of magnitude cost estimates for each of the alternatives. It will culminate with the preparation of a formal report that summarizes the approach,methodology,and conclusions of the analyses to be performed during the Study. Task 7.A Identification and Evaluation of RPZAlternatives o This task will involve the efforts associated with identification and evaluation of various alternatives that could minimize or eliminate the encroachment of the RPZs that would result from the planned relocation of Runway 7-25 at MTH. Each of the options will be evaluated and compared with the original concept that is currently depicted on the Future ALP drawing sheet. The evaluation of RPZ mitigation alternatives will focus on relative cost,constructability,operational impacts, and environmental considerations. The results of this task will be documented in a PowerPoint presentation to facilitate discussions with DOA staff and the FAA. Task 7.A.1 Data Collection and Site Visit ■ As part of this task,the Jacobs Team will collect the lease documents and available floor plans associated with Buildings#26, #28 and#29. It will also conduct a site visit to identify the buildings use and occupancy and confirm the floor plans. This will result in the creation of exhibits that illustrate the leasehold boundaries and floor plans of each building in relationship to relocated RPZ. The site visit will be conducted on the same day as the first meeting with the DOA. Task 7.A.2 Identification of RPZ Mitigation Alternatives ■ In addition to the RPZ configurations depicted on the existing ALP, Ricondo will identify up to four additional RPZ configuration alternatives that would partially or fully mitigate the RPZ encroachments associated with Buildings#26,#28 and#29. These options would include the following: 8..1.1 Demolition and replacement of Buildings #26, #28 and #29 and associated infrastructure outside of the RPZ 8..1.2 Increase the displacement of the Runway 25 landing threshold 8..1.3 Impose building occupancy restrictions 8..1.4 Shift future Runway 7-25 to the west Page 10 of 17 8..1.5 Shift future Runway 7-25 to the east Due to the high level of piston aircraft operations at MTH,the imposition of declared distances on Runway 7-25 will not be evaluated. For each Mitigation Alternative,an exhibit will be prepared that illustrates the proposed modifications. For those options that would result in reduction of the landing distance(s)available on Runway 7 and/or 25,the resulting landing distance(s)available for each runway end would also be documented. Consistent with the FAA Interim Guidance on Land Uses Within a Runway Protection Zone,the documentation of each alternative will include: • A description of each alternative, including a narrative discussion and exhibit depicting the alternative. • The Identification of the preferred alternative that would meet the project purpose and need while minimizing risk associated with the location within the RPZ. • An analysis of the specific portion(s) and percentages of the RPZ affected,drawing a clear distinction between the Central Portion of the RPZ versus the Controlled Activity Area, and clearly delineating the distance from the runway end and runway landing threshold. Task 7.A.3 Runway Landing Distance Impacts Evaluation ■ The potential shifting of Runway 7-25 to the west or increase to the displacement of the Runway 25 landing threshold would reduce the landing distances available on Runways 7 and 25,respectively. To understand the potential operational impacts with displacing the landing threshold, a runway landing distance analysis would be conducted. Ricondo will evaluate the current based aircraft fleet mix,as well as aircraft operational data for the most recent 12-month period to identify up to ten(10)aircraft types to be evaluated. The landing distances associated with both dry and wet runway conditions will be derived. The results of the runway landing distances will be summarized in tabular and graphic format. Task 7.A.4 Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates ■ For each RPZ Mitigation Alternative,a rough order of magnitude(ROM) cost estimate will be prepared.The ROM cost estimates will serve as a comparison to the cost estimates derived for the current concept as illustrated on the current ALP. The ROM Cost estimates will be reflective of both hard(construction)and soft(planning,design, permitting,etc.)costs,and stated in 2020 dollars. The cost estimates will include a summary of estimated quantities and unit cost assumptions. Page 11 of 17 Task 7.A.5 Other Planning Considerations ■ Each RPZ mitigation alternative will be assessed to identify other potential issues, such as operational constraints to tenant facilities, airfield and utility infrastructure,airspace constraints(obstacles and flight procedures), constructability,and impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. The leasehold terms of the facilities within the RPZs would also be documented. Any potential impacts identified during this task will be summarized for review with DOA and FAA staff. Task 7.A.6 Qualitative Risk Analysis ■ Although it is not feasible to quantify the risks associated with having buildings encroach the RPZs at MTH, a qualitative risk analysis will be performed. This analysis will focus on evaluating the existing and future aircraft fleet mix composition to quantify the annual number of aircraft operations conducted by large aircraft(greater than 12,500 lbs.). This is an important distinction, as the RPZ dimension criteria for small aircraft (12,500 lbs. or less)is narrower than the criteria prescribed for large aircraft. In fact,the three buildings that would encroach the Runway 7 Departure RPZ and Runway 25 RPZ prescribed for ARC B-II aircraft would not encroach the RPZ prescribed for ARC B-II if the design aircraft was 12,500 lbs. or less. As a point of reference,the maximum takeoff weight of the Cessna Citation 04 is 16,950 lbs. Task 7.A.7 Summary of Results ■ This task will culminate with the preparation of a PowerPoint presentation that summarizes the approach,methodologies and conclusions of the RPZ Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Study. The PowerPoint presentation will serve as a discussion outline for coordination meetings with the DOA and ultimately to provide a briefing to the FAA's Orlando Airport District Office(ADO). As required,the presentation will be updated to incorporate comments received from the DOA and ADO. Once all comments are incorporated,the Final summary presentation will be incorporated into the Final Report as an appendix. Task 7.B Meetings and Documentation o In addition to the PowerPoint presentation to be prepared,the following meetings and study deliverables are included. Task 7.B.1 Client Coordination and FAA Review Meetings ■ The consultant team will prepare for and participate in up to three meetings during the Study. The first two meetings will be conducted with DOA staff only. The purpose of these meetings will be to review the scope of the Study,collect relevant data,review alternatives and obtain concurrence on the evaluation of alternatives. The third meeting will be to provide a briefing to the FAA's Orlando Airports District Office(ADO)prior to submission of a Final Draft Report. For each Page 12 of 17 meeting,the consultant team will prepare meeting agendas and discussion materials. Following each meeting, meeting notes will be prepared and distributed to all meeting participants and invitees. The first two meetings will be conducted on-site at MTH or Key West International Airport(EYW). The third meeting will be conducted at the Orlando ADO. Task 7.11.2 Documentation ■ The findings of the Study will be documented in a formal report. An Initial Draft Report will be submitted to the DOA for review and comment in portable document file(PDF)format. Once comments are received and addressed by the consultant team,a Final Draft report will be submitted to the FAA's Orlando ADO. In PDF format. Upon receiving comments from the ADO,comments will be addressed, and a Final Report will be submitted in both electronic(PDF and MSWord) and hardcopy format. Up to five hardcopies of the Final Report will be submitted. Other source files,such as AutoCAD Drawings and MS Excel files will also be submitted. ARTICLE C—DESIGN Based on the information collected under Article A and the results of the permitting process as described in Article B the Jacobs Team will perform the following design services: 1. Develop preliminary design for the relocation of Runway 7-25 to support the permitting process that includes a conceptual drainage permit from SFWMD and RPZ analysis that includes preliminary grading to establish runway end elevations. 2. Develop technical specifications utilizing FAA's standard specifications for construction. (i.e.FAA Specifications: P-101, P-152, T-904, T-901, T-905, P-620, ,etc.). Submit an outline of technical specifications at 30%. Submit complete technical specifications at 90%and Final submissions. 3. Coordinate and incorporate Monroe County provided contract document/front-end specifications into the final contract bid documents. (i.e. Notice to Bidders, Invitation to Bidders, Instruction to Bidders, Bid Proposal, Contract, Contract Articles, General Specifications). 4. Develop a construction schedule for use in determining phasing and duration. 5. Prepare for and attend two(2)design review meetings(30%,and 90%)with the Airport to discuss project progress and review the design submittals. 6. Prepare for and attend one(1)meeting at the Airport to discuss construction phasing with Airport staff and Tenants. 7. Develop detailed construction quantities and cost estimate at the 30%, 90%, and at final contract document design levels. 8. Develop the following anticipated plans: Page 13 of 17 Title Sheet(1) Index of Drawings and Notes(1) Summary of Quantities(1) General Plan—Tree Clearing(1) General Plan—Mitigation(1) Survey Control Plan—Tree Clearing(1) Survey Control Plan—Mitigation(1) Haul Route and Part 77 Surfaces(1) Existing Conditions Plan—Tree Clearing and Mitigation(3) GeotechBorings Plan-Mitigation(1) General Phasing Plan(1) Detailed Phasing/Safety Plan(1) Safety Notes/Details(1) Tree Clearing Plans—Tree Clearing and Mitigation(2) Selective Tree Clearing Plans(2) Typical Sections-Mitigation(1) Grading Plans-Mitigation(1) Cross Sections-Mitigation(2) Erosion Control Plan—Tree Clearing and Mitigation(3) Erosion Control Details Tree Clearing and Mitigation(1) Planting Plan—Mitigation(1) Planting Schedule and Details-Mitigation(2) Miscellaneous Details(2) Total: 32 Sheets 9. Develop Engineer's report at the 30%,90%, and Final design submissions. 10. Coordinate, distribute and print the following copies of the preliminary construction documents for the construction package (plans, specifications, design report, and construction cost estimate)for review by the Airport,FAA,and FDOT: Preliminary Submission (30%, 90%, Final Contract Documents for each construction package) FAA: 2 half size copies of plans and a CD containing the drawings, specifications, engineering report,and engineer's estimate for each submission. FDOT: 2 half size copies of plans; and a CD containing the drawings, specifications, engineering report,and engineer's estimate for the 90%submission only. MTH: 2 copies of plans(I full size; 1 half size); 2 copies of specifications;2 copies of engineering report; and 2 copies of engineer's estimate for each submission 11. Conduct an in-house QA/QC prior to each submission. The in-house QA/QC check will involve an experienced independent individual,depending on each discipline,to conduct a comprehensive check on all documents to be submitted (e.g. plans, specifications, estimates, reports). Time will be required for engineers and CADD technicians/designers to correct items listed under the in-house QA/QC checks. Page 14 of 17 12. Address comments from 30%,and 90%design submissions. 13. Prepare and submit electronically FAA form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. 14. Prepare and submit a Construction Safety Phasing Plan(CSPP). Services for Article C will be provided under a lump sum basis. Article D—Optional Tasks Optional Tasks will only be performed with prior approval from Monroe County and the FAA. Task LA Tropical Hardwood Hammock Resurvey/Transects If site conditions are substantially different than those of the original survey,then a resurvey of the transects using the previous protocol may be required. This task will require a separate site visit. In addition, the vegetative cover of each species will be re-calculated based on the results of the site visit. Task 1.11 Stock Island Tree Snail Survey If rain events or other conditions vary during the Stock Island Tree Snail Survey such that survey protocol requirements cannot be met, additional site visits may be needed. Two(2)additional site visits are assumed for this task if needed. Task 1.0 Individual/Standard USACE Permit If the project does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit, an Individual/Standard USACE permit application will be required. The Jacobs Team will prepare the permit application. Responses to two(2)RAIs are included. This task also includes additional coordination with the USACE. Task 1.1) Monroe County Tropical Hardwood Hammock—Alternative Mitigation Plan If it is preferred to identify site-specific mitigation plans for restoration,enhancement,or relocation in lieu of paying into the County's mitigation fund for tropical hardwood hammock impacts, the Jacobs Team will work with the County and Airport to identify opportunities. Following coordination with the County and Airport,site visits will be conducted at a maximum of three(3) potential restoration sites during one (1) trip. During the site visits, habitat conditions will be documented to determine if each site is appropriate for restoration and the site with the greatest opportunity to provide alternative mitigation will be selected. An alternative mitigation plan will be provided if an acceptable site is identified. Task LE Formal Consultation with USFWS and FAA If the Stock Island Tree Snail is documented in the surveys, the USFWS will require formal consultation and preparation of a Biological Opinion (BO). The Jacobs Team will prepare appropriate documentation and coordinate with the USFWS and FAA to address the requirements of a BO regarding the Stock Island Tree Snail. Article E—Bid Phase Services Page 15 of 17 Upon completion of the construction documents and at the request of the Airport,Jacobs will prepare the project documents for bidding. Jacobs will perform bidding support services,the following terms will apply: A. The County appoints Jacobs as its Agent, and Jacobs accepts such appointment to perform bid/procurement services on the County's behalf in connection with the project. B. Such services shall be performed under the County's direction and in accordance to such forms, terms and conditions, or modifications or revisions to same as the County may in its sole discretion at any time instruct Jacobs to use. All services shall be carried out in accordance with the procedures mutually agreed upon by the County and Jacobs. C. Jacobs shall not have authority to accept or bind the County in any way to changes, modifications, revisions, alterations, amendments, or supplemental, additional, or different terms and conditions (hereinafter referred to as "deviations") which may be submitted or requested by a vendor or contractor. Jacobs shall immediately submit any deviations from the County's standard terms and conditions to the County for review by the County's Purchasing Manager or their representative and such deviations shall not be accepted by Jacobs unless Jacobs receives express written approval thereof from the County's Project and/or Purchasing Manager or their representative. D. All documents issued by Jacobs hereunder shall be signed by Jacobs for the County if so directed. The ownership and title of all items purchased hereunder shall pass directly from the selling party to the County, and Jacobs shall at no time be a party to such transaction other than as agent of the County. The County shall have the unilateral right to have the commitment authority of Jacobs, its employee or this limited agency authorization in its entirety revoked and cancelled at any time, with or without cause. The County shall be obligated directly to the selling party for all payments for materials, equipment, supplies and services procured hereunder. E. The County shall hold Jacobs and its employees harmless from any claims, suits or liabilities arising out of any breach or other failure of performance by any contractor,vendor or supplier under any contract or purchase order issued by Jacobs hereunder. The following task will be performed as part of the bid phase services: I. Coordinate with the County Purchasing Department and the Airport to advertise for bids. 2. Coordinate with the County to provide electronic copies of the bid documents to prospective bidders 3. Prepare for and attend a project pre-bid conference 4. Prepare responses to address requests for information from prospective bidders 5. Prepare and coordinate the issuing one(1)addendum with the County purchasing department. 6. Revise bid documents as necessary for the addendum Page 16 of 17 7. Review bids for responsiveness 8. Prepare a bid tabulation 9. Make a recommendation for award based on review of the bid information submitted. 10. Prepare conformed documents and construction contract. Services for Article E will be provided under a lump sum basis. PROJECT SCHEDULE: A detailed project schedule will be generated upon receipt of the executed purchase service order. It is anticipated that a contract will be executed in September,2020 and will take approximately 18-20 months to complete. The project will be completed such that bids can be opened in June, 2021 to allow for an FAA grant application to be submitted for the tree clearing. Page 17 of 17 =ADDiTEI YYYY)► E TIFICATE OF LI BILITY INSUR NCE 2020 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the pollcy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in Merl of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER LFIC 1#0437153 1 21.2-948-1.306 CONTACT NAME: Marsh Risk & insurance Services PHONE FAX CIRIS Support@jacobs,com ( I AINt, xtl Iar Nol I-212-545-I3Q6 633 W. Fifth Street ADDRESS: .. .. ... .. .. ... ... ... ......... „_„_,,,INSURER(S}AFFORDING COVERAGE ....... ....... ....... NAIC#........ Los Angeles, CA 90071 INSURERA: A,CE AMER INS CO 22667 INSURED '...INSLIRER B Jacobs Project Management Co. IN$I}REFt' ------------------------ C/O Global Risk Management INSURER© 1000 Wilshire Blvd. , .Suite 2100 INSURERS. Los Angeles, CA 90017 INSURERF. COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER. 59742119 REVISION NUMBER. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IN'SR ......... ....... ........ ........ .AADL SLIBR.. POLICY EFF , POLICY E%P LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE [NS© WVQ POLICY NUMBER MMiDDIYYYY MMIDDfYYYY LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY IHDO G71452694 07/01/20 07/01/21 EACHOCCURRENCE S 1,000,000 CLAIMS•E[ADE X OCCUR PREMISES DAMAGE"rC REN rr NRE€v1ISE5(Eia_Yurre1 -0 S.. 500,000 X CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY MED EXP'(Any one Person! S 5,000 ........ ......... ......... ......... ...PERSONAL&ADs INJURY S 1,000,000 ... GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER GENERAL AGGREGATE ;-. 1,000,000 ............ X POLICY. .._..__ PRO- LOG ....PRODUCTS.COMP`OP AGG S.. 1,000,000 ................. JECT i OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ISA H25307306 , 07/01/20 07/01/21 COMB4NED SINGLE LIMIT a 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO _I �. - q � BODILY INJURY(Per person) S iI ...... ...... .... ....... ............. OWNED SCHEDULED �BODILY'NJURY(Per ac.cnc er±[I S AUTOS ONLY AUTOS; b - ,»-,,..,, ..... ..... s , HIRED NON OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE... S.. AUTOS ONLY AUTO$ONLY i � �. .�,:=, '-. (Pel earcidenlj k 7/28/2020 S UMBRELLA.LIAB OCCUR �������re.,�--_, ".. � EACH OCCURRENCE S.. EXCESS LIAR .. CLAtI�IS-MADE: �„® ....,AGGR£G/S;TE ... S ... .... WANW DED RETENTION S S A WORKERS COMPENSATION 'NCU C67460340 (OHI.O Only°07/Q1/2Q 07/01/21 X` ST,aC:WE I EORH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY .. ... A ANYPROPRIErOR;PARINERrE:XEC,tITIVE NIA 5CE C67460388 (WI) 07/01/20 07/01/21 EL EACH ACCIDENT' S 1,000,000 OFFICERA'FIASER EXCLUDED� ... ..... .. .... .... A (Mandatory in NH) WLR C67460303 (AOS) 07/01/20 07/01/21 E L DISEASE•Eh EMPLOYEE S 1,000,000 If Yin,rdesr.rlhe under .. .._� ....... y. 1,000,000 ............ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E L DISEASE.POLICY LIMIT A PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EON G21655065 Oil 07/01/20 07/01/21 PER CLAIM/PER AGG 1,000,000 ",CLAIMS MARE" AGGREGATE 2,000,000 DEFENSE INCLUDED DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached it more space is requiredl OFFICE LOCATION: Jacksonville, FL 32202. PROJECT MGR: Ryan Forney. CONTRACT MGR: Jack Renton. SENIOR CONTRACT MGR: Christopher Bowker. RE: Monroe County Airports - General Consulting Services Master Agreement with Jacobs Project Management Company for Professional Services at Key Nest International Airport and The Florida Heys Marathon International Airport. CONTRACT END DATE: 02/14/2022. PROJECT NUMBER,: E9YI6700. SECTOR: Public. *$2,000,000 SIR FOR STATE OF: OHIO. The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners, its employees and officials are added as an additional insured for general liability & auto liability as respects the negligence of the insured in the performance of insured®s services to cert holder under contract for captioned work. *THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND LIMITS PROVIDED CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE Monroe County Hoard of County Commissioners THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, 'NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISION& 1100 Simonton Street AU THO RIZ E D R E PRESE NTATI VE Key Vest , FL 33040 USA 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION.. All rights reserved. ACORD 2 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Cert Renewal 597'42II9 DATE SUPPLEMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 07/06/20 0 NAME OF INSURED. Jacobs Project management Co, UNDER THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WILL NOT EXCEED OR BROADEN IN ANY WAY THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND LIMITS AGREED TO UNDER THE APPLICABLE CONTRACT.* supp(10100) Froin: Nyarl.Yumdo(kjacobs.coin To: mouroccountyfl; Rickard, Melody iiioiiroecoui,ityflCa),Ebix.coiii,Melody.Rickard(O-�jacobs.eoiii CC: CIRTS_Stil)l)oi-t(7q,,.jacobs.com Subject: Re: I EXTERNAL] Motiroe Coutity Florida Certificate of hisuraInce leg (Rellewal Col) Date: 7/6/2020 5:19:38 PM Attachment(s): Hi All, Attached is the renewal copy of Certificate of Liability Insurance for your reference. Please confirm, if this is the certificate you are looking for. If not,then kindly provide us the copy of expired certificate or contract/project number in order to enable us to identify the certificate. If there are any further questions in regards to this matter, please email CIRTS—Support@jacobs.com. Regards, Nyari Yumdo Global Risk Management Support Nyari.Yumdo@jacobs.com From: Customer Service<monroecountyfl@ebix.com> Sent:07 July 2020 01:09 To: Rickard, Melody<Melody.Rickard@jacobs.com>;CIRTS_Support<CIRTS_Support@jacobs.com> Subject, [EXTERNAL] Monroe County Florida Certificate of Insurance Req v The attached notice is being sent to you on behalf of Monroe County Florida by Ebix RCS. Monroe County Florida has engaged with Ebix to manage insurance compliance verification an its behalf, You Must be properly insured while doing business with Monroe County Florida and comply with insurance requirements. As of the date of this notice we have not received proper evidence of insurance coverage. Please review the attached notice as it includes the information needed for compliance and where to send your Certificate of Insurance, Vendor Instructions:The attached notice is being sent to you and your agent, if we have their email address an file. Agent lnstructions� Please review the attached notice as it Includes the information needed for compliance. Please send your Certificate of Insurance via email to monroecountyfl@ebix,corn; if you have any questions, please contact Ebix by calling(951) 925-1213; thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. B X Ebix Inc. I One Ebix way I Johns Creek, GA 30097 1 Web- 4 NOTICE TO OTHERS ENDORSEMENT— SCHEDULE— EMAIL ONLY Narned Insured Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Endorsement Numbef 15 Policy Symbol Policy Number Policy Period Effective Date of Endorsement HDO �G71452694 I07/01/2020 TO 07/0112021 Issued By(Narre of insurance company) ACE American Insurance Company Insert;he policy number.The remainder of the€nfornmat.on is to be completed oNy Mien this endo^seriiert is issued subsequerit to tree preparation of the policy. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.. A. If we cancel the Policy prior to its expiration date by notice to you or the first blamed Insured for any reason other than nonpayment of premium,we will endeavor, as set out below, to send written notice of cancellation, via such electronic notification as we determine, to the persons or organizations listed in the schedule that you or your representative provide or have provided to us (the"Schedule"). You or your representative must provide us with the e-mail address of such persons or organizations„ and we will utilize such e-mail address that you or your representative provided to us on such Schedule- B. The Schedule must be initially provided to us within 15 days after: I. The beginning of the Policy period, if this endorsement is effective as of such date;or ii. This endorsement has been added to the Policy, if this endorsement is effective after the Policy period commences. C. The Schedule must be in an electronic format that is acceptable to us;and must be accurate. C. Our delivery of the notification as described in Paragraph A. of this endorsement will be based can the most recent Schedule in our records as of the date the notice of cancellation is mailed or delivered to the first famed Insured. E. We will endeavor to send such notice to the e-rnail address corresponding to each person or organization indicated in the Schedule at least 30 days prior to the cancellation date applicable to the Policy.. F. The notice referenced In this endorsement is intended only to be a courtesy notification to the person(s) or organization(s) reamed in the Schedule in the event of a pending cancellation of coverage. We have no legal obligation of any kind to any such person(s) or organizations). Our failure to provide advance notification of cancellation to the person(s) or organizations) shown In the Schedule shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon us, our agents or representatives, will not extend any Policy cancellation date and will not negate any cancellation of the Policy. C. We are not responsible for verifying any information provided to us in any Schedule, nor are we responsible for any incorrect information that you or your representative provide to us. If you or your representative does not provide us with a Schedule, we have no responsibility for taking any action under this endorsement. In addition, if neither you nor your representative provides us with e-mail address information with respect to a particular person or organization, then we shall have no responsibility for taking action with regard to such person or entity under this endorsement. H. We may arrange with your representative to send such notice in the event of any such cancellation. I. You will cooperate with iris In providing the Schedule,or in causing your representative to provide the Schedule. J. This endorsement does not apply in the event that you cancel the Policy. ALL-32686(01111) Page't of 2