Loading...
Item P03BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Division: Growth Management Bulk Item: Yes _ No X Department: Planning & Environmental Resources Staff Contact: Andrew Trivette Division Director Susan Grimslev. Assist. Co. Attv. AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A public hearing imposing an Interim Development Ordinance prohibiting the approval of new allocations of ROGO or NROGO for Big Pine Key and No Name Key until such time as a mitigation ordinance is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners or to be effective for allocations through and including the ROGO Allocation Quarter ending July 14, 2008. ITEM BACKGROUND: During the spring and fall of 2000 the residents and property owners of Big Pine and No Name Keys worked with Monroe County planning staff to develop the Master Plan for Future Development on Big Pine No Name Keys (Master Plan). However, in order for any new development to occur, including road widening improvements to US 1, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was required. Consequently, Monroe County, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs applied for an Incidental Take Permit (ITP). To comply with the issuance criteria of the ITP, Monroe County and the co -applicants were required to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to mitigate the incidental take of the Key Deer resulting from development activities. The mitigation measure proposed was land acquisition. The purpose of the mitigation ordinance is to establish a funding source or other mechanism for land acquisition and conservation, in order to ensure that development bears its fair share of mitigation. Until this point, the County had enough land in its name to cover the mitigation required for new development. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: Habitat Conservation Plan adopted — April 2003 Master Plan for Big Pine Key and No Name Key adopted — December 2004 Interim Development Ordinance prohibiting the approval of new Allocations of ROGO and NROGO — November 2007 (which expires January 31, 2008) CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval. TOTAL COST: N/A COST TO COUNTY: N/A BUDGETED: Yes No SOURCE OF FUNDS: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty X OMB/Purchasing Risk Management _ DOCUMENTATION: Included X Not Required DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM # ORDINANCE NO. -2008 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMIVIISSIONERS IMPOSING AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE APPROVAL OF NEW ALLOCATIONS OF ROGO OR NROGO FOR BIG PINE KEY AND NO NAME KEY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A MITIGATION ORDINANCE IS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OR TO BE EFFECTIVE FOR ALLOCATIONS THROUGH AND INCLUDING THE ROGO ALLOCATION QUARTER ENDING JULY 14, 2008 WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL INCONSISTENT PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE TRANSMITTAL OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, utilization of the moratorium as a temporary measure to facilitate governmental decision -making, study, and the adoption of comprehensive plan amendments and/or land development regulations, is a legitimate governmental tool to facilitate logical and considered growth and a means of avoiding inefficient and ill- conceived development; and WHEREAS, development on Big Pine Key and No Name Key is subject to the requirements of the Habitat Conservation Plan adopted in April, 2003 and the Master Plan for Future Development of Big Pine Key and No Name Key which was effective in December, 2004 ; and WHEREAS, Florida Department of Transportation, Monroe County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs received a Federal Fish and Wildlife Incidental Take Permit (ITP) dated June 9, 2006 which limits development based on the potential taking of threatened and endangered species; and WHEREAS, a certain amount of property in its natural state is required to comply with the requirements in the above documents; and WHEREAS, to date, property owned by Monroe County as habitat for threatened and endangered species has been sufficient to compensate for the permitted development on Big Pine Key and No Name Key; and WHEREAS, there is no longer surplus real property constituting habitat for threatened or endangered species owned by Monroe County sufficient to cover mitigation for public and private development; and WHEREAS, property sufficient to compensate for the effects of development will have to be provided in order to mitigate the effects; and WHEREAS, Monroe County finds it in the best interest of the public to establish a temporary moratorium on approval of allocations for building permits on Big Pine Key and No Name Key in order to determine the extent of mitigation required and the method of exacting such mitigation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended a six month interim development ordinance at its meeting on November 7, 2007 and the Board of County Commissioners approved a two month time period in Ordinance No.44- 2007 which expires January 31, 2008; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter January 8, 2008; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Board of County Commissioners adopts the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of its enactment of this Interim Development Ordinance. Section 2 . Interim Development Regulations. Commencing February 1, 2008 Staff is directed to continue to defer the allocation of ROGO and NROGO awards for Big Pine Key and No Name Key until land development regulations can be passed establishing methods and amounts of mitigation required for allocations for building permits on Big Pine Key and No Name Key, or to be effective for allocations through and including the ROGO allocation quarter ending July 14, 2008 whichever occurs first; based on the quarterly evaluation and allocation system. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance. Section 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. The provisions of the Monroe County Code and all Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed or stayed as necessary during the effective dates of this ordinance. Section 5. Approval by the State Department of Community Affairs. The provisions of this Ordinance constitute a "land development regulation" as State law defines that term. Accordingly, the Monroe County Clerk is authorized to forward a copy of this Ordinance to the State Department of Community Affairs for approval pursuant to Sections 380.05(6) and (11), Florida Statutes and to the Secretary of State for the State of Florida, as required. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon approval by the State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida at a regular meeting of said Board on the day of , 2008. Mayor Charles "Sonny" McCoy Mayor Pro Tem Mario DiGennaro Commissioner Dixie Spehar Commissioner George Neugent Commissioner Sylvia Murphy BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA Mayor Charles :"Sonny" McCoy (SEAL) ATTEST: Danny L. Kolhage, CLERK Deputy Clerk MOLAR COUNTY ATTORNEY APP/ EDAM FORD - �- r 3 To: Board of County Commissioners Through: Andrew Trivette, Director of Growth Management Townsley Schwab, Acting Planning Director From: Susan Grimsley, Asst. County Attorney Date: December 20, 2007 RE: PROPOSED INTERIM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE FOR BIG PINE KEY AND NO NAME KEY Proposal: Planning Commission - At the October 10, 2007 meeting of the Planning Commission, the Commission instructed staff to draft an ordinance to prevent the award of allocations on Big Pine Key and No Name Key for ROGO and NROGO until an ordinance determining the type of mitigation, and imposing and calculating mitigation could be passed. A moratorium on the award of ROGO allocations was passed by the BOCC effective December 1, 2007 for two months. It expires January 31,2008. The proposed ordinance directs staff to defer allocation of ROGO and NROGO awards for Big Pine Key and No Name Key commencing February 1, 2008, until methods for mitigation for impacts to protected and endangered species can be established or for a length of time which covers the allocations through July 14, 2008, whichever occurs first. A. Previous County Action BOCC - the Big Pine Key Habitat Conservation Plan was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan in April, 2003. The Master Plan for Future Development of Big Pine Key and No Name Key was adopted and effective in December, 2004. Monroe County applied for an Incidental Take Permit along with Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in May 2003. The Incidental Take Permit is dated June 9, 2006. These documents require mitigation by land preservation in order to allow further development. Until this point, the County had enough land in its name to cover the mitigation required for new development. Development Review Commission - On November 6, 2007 the Development Review Committee will meet to review this moratorium and consider staff comments and those of the public. The Planning Commission considered the original moratorium at its November 7, 2007 meeting, and recommended approval for six (6) months. The Planning Commission will consider this proposed extension at its regular meeting on January 8, 2008. B. Background During the spring and fall of 2000 the residents and property owners of Big Pine and No Name Keys worked with Monroe County planning staff to develop the Master Plan for Future Development on Big Pine No Name Keys (Master Plan). However, in order for any new development to occur, including road widening improvements to US 1, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was required. Consequently, Monroe County, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs applied for an Incidental Take Permit (ITP). To comply with the issuance criteria of the ITP, Monroe County and the co -applicants were required to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to mitigate the incidental take of the Key Deer resulting from development activities. The mitigation measure proposed was land acquisition. The applicants proposed to acquire and conserve habitat lands totaling three (3) times the harvest value (H value) impacted by development. This proposal is incorporated into the Master Plan as Action Item 9.2.4, which proposes the creation of an environmental mitigation fee for land acquisition. The purpose of the mitigation fee is to establish a funding source for land acquisition and conservation, in order to ensure that development bears its fair share of mitigation. C. Intent - It is the intent of this interim development ordinance to temporarily halt award of building permits for new development (not repairs or reconstruction) in order to pass a mitigation ordinance. The mitigation ordinance has been drafted. D. Consistency with Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan This interim development ordinance is consistent with the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan because there are new issues as well as policies in the Big Pine Master Plan which need to be addressed. A moratorium is the only way to provide time to consider these issues and compose new regulations. E. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. fV1 MEMORANDUM MONROE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT We strive to be friendly, professional. and Fair To: The Board of County Commissioners From: Townsley Schwab, Acting Director of Planning & Env. Res. Through: Andrew Trivette, Growth Management Director Date: January 9, 2008 Meeting date: January 16, 2008 Re: Interim Development Ordinance Big Pine and No Name Key 3 At the Panning Commission meeting on January 8, 2008 the Commission voted unanimously against imposing an Interim Development Ordinance prohibiting the approval of new allocations of ROGO or NROGO for Big Pine Key and No Name Key, and allowing allocations as long as there is mitigation land available. This includes land set aside for public project mitigation. Cc: Randy Wall C ;tom f., •y Rf.R; A Tyr!:-rrR«! KEY DEER PROTECTION ALLIANCE, INC. P.O. Box 430224 Big Pine Key, Florida 33043-0224 January 16, 2oo8 To: Mayor McCoy and Fellow Monroe County Commissioners. Re: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting, Key West, FL. "Agenda Item: P-3. A public hearing imposing an Interim Development Ordinance prohibiting the approval of new allocations of ROGO of NROGO for Big Pine Key and No Name Key until such time as a mitigation ordinance is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners or to be effective for allocations through and including the ROGO Allocations Quarter ending July 14, 2008. Dear Mayor and Fellow Commissioners: In an attempt to put the issue into perspective, we would like to point out the following. • 168 acres of land will be impacted by the development activities allowed by our 2010 Comp Plan and HCP/ITP through the 20-year period. • 27o acres of conservation lands need to be acquired to meet the total amount of mitigation required by our 2010 Plan and HCP/ITP. • 62 acres of conservation land is needed to mitigate the impacts of the planned 200 single family residential ROGO units. • 47 of the 200 SFR units have been permitted and mitigated for by the County. • 47 acres of conservation land needs to be acquired for the remaining 153 single family residential ROGO permits. Less than so acres! This is a doable task. Sure, we could use some help. So, let's finally make a serious effort to find grants to offset the land acquisition costs. -t- V '3 By approving the proposed moratorium six, perhaps as many as eight, ROGO applications could be delayed. So, as many as six ROGO applicants could be delayed — that is because two applicants are in the queue for more than one single family residence. The first four in line all entered the ROGO queue in 2007. And, six of the eight applications which may be delayed are for development in Tier 2 lands, where one would expected a longer wait for an allocation. Keep in mind prior to the HCP/ITP and the 2004 changes to our Comp Plan only eight allocations per year, including affordable housing, were allowed. More importantly, those eight applicants were automatically handicapped negative points and competed with the entire Lower Keys sub area. So, even with out the Level of Service moratorium in place, there has been a defacto moratorium on Big Pine Key and No Name Key since January 4,1996. In fact in many cases the regulations in the current 2010 Comp Plan and HCP/ITP are less restrictive than what we had in our Comp Plan prior to the Master Plan and HCP. Also keep in mind, while in clear violation of the 2010 Comp Plan, we have issued more than 8 permits a year and more than io permits a year in spite of a concurreney moratorium. For that reason alone, especially considering the changes that have occurred in the DCA over the last two years, ROGO and NROGO allocations should be put on hold until the County comes into compliance with its own plan which would mean, coincidentally, a moratorium including the ROGO Quarter ending July 14, 20o8. To some, particularly those looking at this issue from a personal perspective, the County's mitigation commitment is seen as unreasonable. But, from the broader perspective of endangered species protection, the County was given a permit to literally kill a certain number of a federally listed endangered species despite the fact that even under the existing terms of the HCP/ITP over i,000 acres of Tier 1 lands will remain unprotected from development at the end of the 2o-yoE period in 202-q. Thank you. -2- Sincerely, y� (�- µ ®Gjr Alicia Putney, Board AdvisW