Item M15
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: August 20,2008
Division: Growth Management
Bulk Item: Yes ~
No
Department:
Staff Contact: Andrew O. Trivette
AGENDA ITEM WORDING:
Approval of a resolution by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners supporting the action
of the Mayor in transmitting the Monroe County Area of Critical State Concern De-designation report as
required by Florida Statutes to the Department of Community Affairs.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
On January 28, 2008, then Mayor McCoy received a letter from the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) requesting Monroe County's assistance in completing the Florida Keys Removal of Designation
Report to the Administration Commission. The Growth Management Division compiled a written
report with supporting data and analysis on all Work Program tasks relating to Monroe County. This
report provided to DCA the status of all tasks, including any remaining work, financial status and a
schedule for completion, as requested. On June 11, 2008, the Monroe County Area of Critical State
Concern De-designation Report was transmitted to DCA and copies of the report were sent to all County
Commissioners along with the transmittal letter to DCA which was signed by Mayor DiGennaro and
County Administrator Roman Gastesi.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: N/A
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
TOTAL COST:
n/a
BUDGETED: Yes
No
COST TO COUNTY:
n/a
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes
No x
AMOUNTPERMONTH_ Year
APPROVED BY: County Arty ~ OMBlPurchasing _Risk Management_
DOCUMENTATION:
Included
x
Not Required_
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM #
RESOLUTION NO. -2008
A RESOLUTION OF THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUPPORTING THE ACTION OF
THE MAYOR IN TRANSMITTING THE MONROE COUNTY
AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION
REPORT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 380.0552.
WHEREAS, Florida Statute 380.0552 establishes the procedure by which the
Florida Administration Commission shall remove the Area of Critical State Concern
designation from Monroe County and the Florida Keys; and
WHEREAS, Florida Statute 380.0552 also requires that the Florida
Administration Commission base their decision on a "removal of designation" report
provided by the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, Florida Statute 380.0552 stipulates that the Removal of Designation
Report be submitted no later than August 30, 2008; and
WHEREAS, Florida Statute 380.0552 further mandates that the Florida
Administration Commission render a finding by October 1,2008; and
WHEREAS, Florida Statute 380.0552 dictates that should the Administration
Commission find that Monroe County has made substantial progress toward the
implementation of the work program as set forth in rule 28-20.110 of the Florida
Administrative Code on January 1, 2006, excluding any amendments that took effect
after that date, the Area of Critical State Concern designation shall be removed by
October 1,2009; and
WHEREAS, Monroe County Mayor Charles "Sonny" McCoy received a letter
dated January 28, 2008 from Craig Diamond," Chief of State Planning with the Florida
Department of Community Affairs requesting a written report with supporting data and
analysis regarding progress toward the implementation of the work program to aid in the
drafting of the Removal of Designation Report and setting an approximate deadline for
this assistance of April 30, 2008; and
WHEREAS, On June 11, 2008 Monroe County transmitted the Monroe County
Area of Critical State Concern De-designation Report to Mr. Diamond and the Florida
Department of Community Affairs with a cover letter including both Monroe County
Mayor Mario Di Gennaro and Monroe County Administrator Roman Gastesi, Jr.;
Page 1 of2
Reviewer:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1: The BOCC acknowledges the significance of the Florida Department of
Community Affairs' Removal of Designation Report which is to serve, pursuant to
Florida Statute 308.0552, as the basis for a finding by the Florida Administration
Commission of either substantial progress or failure to make substantial progress toward
the implementation of the work program.
Section 2: The BOCC commits its support to the Monroe County Area of Critical State
Concern De-designation Report and the corresponding cover letter as transmitted to the
Florida Department of Community Affairs as a statement of progress to date for the
implementation of the work program and analysis of statutory procedures.
Section 3: The BOCC continues to recognize the value of Mayor Mario DiGennaro's
representation to the State of Florida and provides continued support for his leadership in
Tallahassee and further authorizes him to represent the majority opinion of the BOCC to
the State of Florida.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of County
Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, held on the 20th day of August, 2008.
Mayor Mario DiGennaro
Mayor Pro Tem Charles "Sonny" McCoy
Commissioner Sylvia Murphy
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner Dixie M. Spehar
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Mayor Mario DiGennaro
(SEAL)
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
By:
SUS M. GRIMSLE
ASSI[Y' T COUNTY ATTORNEY ~
Date y,( .A/>.A- <+ I :u:.>O
Page 2 of2
Reviewer:
.
~
.-
/~
I'
~ ~.
\. .
~~~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
CHARLIE CRIST
Go',emor
THOMAS G. PELHAM
Secretary
January 28,2008
-~~.
~ ft1... '.. ;~. \ ~l_.
\';'~'n~-
\'\ ',;';': \ r
',Il. fEE ~" <) ~
.t'':;. \
I \
. ,
+~"
-,~"+I.~
~.",~,~'~ III ~<
. ""\
t ~,~
:,~\~,~~
't~ ~;
~ , f') \,
d)tY i' ,',,',
~ .\
I \
r ~j;J~\~j \
~ ....~~fd1"~~-
_/,,,,.r. ._,
The Honorable Sonny McCoy
Mayor, Monroe County
Florida Keys Marathon Airport
9400 Overseas Highway, Suite.21 0
Marathon, Florida 33050
RE: Removal of Designation Report
Dear Mayor McCoy:
Section 380.0052, Florida Statutes, requires the preparation of a Removal of Designation
report that is to describe in detail the progress of the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern
toward accomplishing the tasks outlined in Rule 28-20, F.A.C. (the 10-year Work Program). To
fulfill this statutory requirement, the Department of Community Affairs requests Monroe County's
assistance in completing the Florida Keys Removal of Designation Report to the Administration
Commission.
Specifically, the Department is requesting a written report with supporting data and analysis
on all Work Program tasks relating to Monroe County. Please provide to the Department the status
of all tasks, including any remaining work, financial status, if applicable, and a schedule for
completion. A copy of the Work Program is enclosed. We would also like to include any progress
you wish to report for Monroe County related to the Principles for Guiding Development for the
Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern, Section 380.0552 (7) F.S., a copy of which is attached.
The Department requests this report be completed as soon as practical, but not later than 90
days of receiving this letter (approximate deadline of April 30, 2008). The Department will review,
verify and compile all the information received and will work closely with Monroe County to
ensure accuracy in the drafting the report.
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 2910781
, n t ern eta d d res 5: tLttJLLL~_'I{:oY.. cLC;.<!,J2JjlJf:) tULs.
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE
21<:i6 Q',efse3S Highway. Su,te 212
M:Jfilthcl1, FL '20SO, 2227
(JGb) :e~-~~02
COMMUNITY PlANNING
2555 Sl1umard Oak aou:evard
TJ'lah,;,,,,,e. Fe 32399.21CO
liJWj -le8.~356
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2555 Snumard Oak Bcu!evard
T~H~Jt'l:)~'_"-ee_ Fl12399~2100
{1;SC} 483. 1~:J58
Mayor Sonny McCoy
January 28,2008
Page 2
Monroe County's contribution is important to the Department. Thank you for your
cooperation and prompt response. Please feel free to contact Rebecca Jetton at (850) 922-1766 if
you have any questions.
S.l.'n:JrjJ . (. ..
~~Y~~j
Craig Diamond
Chief of State Planning
CD/ams
cc: Debbie Frederick, Acting Monroe County Administrator
Mark J. Rosch, Executive Director, Monroe County Land Authority
Attachments (2)
2
\VORK PROGRAM (Rule 28-20.110)
Ian \-Iarch 9, 1999. the Administration Commission determined that substantial progress toward the work program
objectives had not been made and authorized rulemaking to amend the work program beginning in Year Three. Work
program tasks from Years One and Tv,:Q not completed by the end of Year Two were included as tasks in subsequent
years of the work program.
YEAR ONE (ending December 31,1997).
A. Complete Phase I (data collection) for the Wastewater and Stormwater \taster Plans, and secure funding for
plan completion. (Ref. County obj. 901.4)
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOH and SF\V\fD.
B. Complete a conceptual plan or scope of work to develop a carrying capacity. The carrying capacity analysis shall
be designed to detennine the ability of the Florida Keys ecosystem, and the various segments thereof, to \vithstand all
impacts of additional land development activities. The analysis shall be based upon the findings adopted by the
Administration Commission on December 12, 1995, or more recent data that may become available in the course of the
study, and shall be based upon the benchmarks of, and all adverse impacts to, the Keys land and water natural systems,
in addition to the impact of nutrients on marine resources. The carrying capacity analysis shall consider aesthetic,
socioeconomic (including sustainable tourism), quality of life and community character issues, including the
concentration of population, the amount of open space, diversity of habitats, and species richness. The analysis shall
reflect the interconnected nature of the Florida Keys' natural systems, but may consider and analyze the carrying
capacity of specific islands or groups of islands and specific ecosystems or habitats, including distinct parts of the Keys'
marine system. (Ref. 1991 Stip. Settlement Agreement)
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, NMS, SFRPC, EPA, USFWS, Army COE, and
other interested parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
C. Complete A WT/OSDS demonstration study and initiate rulemaking for new standards for OSDS. (Ref. County
pol. 901.4.3)
Agencies: DOH.
D. Complete Marathon Facilities Plan and secure funding for the facility site(s). The wastewater facilities plan
should implement the most cost effective method of collecting, treating, and disposing of wastewater, and shall include
an investigation of the feasibility of using alternative nutrient-stripping on-site disposal systems. The development of
the facilities plan shall be a component of the Wastewater Master Plan as that Plan is developed.
Agencies: County, DCA and DEP.
E. Continue cesspit elimination process with identification of Hot Spots as first priority in accordance with
Objective 901.2, and seek funding for cesspit identification. Enter into an interlocal agreement with DOH to specify the
responsibilities and procedures for the OSDS inspection/compliance program as required by Policy 901.2.3. Adopt an
ordinance which specifies the implementation procedures for the OSDS inspection/compliance program. The ordinance
shall include authorization for DOH to inspect wastewater treatment systems on private property as required by Policy
901.2.3. (Ref. County obj. 901.2)
Agencies: County, DCA and DOH.
F. Submit status of CARL and ROGO land acquisition to the Administration Commission.
Agencies: County, Land Authority and DEP.
G. Revise the Habitat Evaluation Index (HEI) based on peer review.
Agencies: County, DCA. DEP, FFWCC and Federal agencies.
YEAR TWO (ending December 31. 1998).
A. Complete the Wastewater and Stormwater \[aster Plans and execute interagency agreements to define
construction schedule by phases. Document that significant reduction in nutrients will be achieved each year thereafter
\vithin each of the sub-areas. The Master Plans shall include tacility plans tor all proposed treatment strategies, and
determine retrofit and funding requirements tor Hot Spots and cesspits identified in D. below.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP and DOH.
2
B. Secure tunding tor the carrying capacity study and initiate Phase I (data collection) of the study.
Agencies: County and DCA.
C. Complete final design for \farathon Facilities Plan and secure facility site(s).
Agencies: County, DC A and DEP.
D. Complete cesspit ID process in Hot Spots, excluding the "-larathon area.
Agencies: County, DCA and DOH.
E. Submit status of CARL and ROGO land acquisition to the Administration Commission.
Agencies: County, Land Authority. FFWCC and DEP.
F. Document the extent and quality of the fresh groundwater lens system on Big Pine Key; delineate the associated
recharge areas; and determine the safe yield of the system. (Re[ County pol. 103.1.5)
Agencies: County, DC A, SFW'-'1D, USFWS.
YEAR THREE (January I, 1999 through July 12,2000).
A. Complete and begin implementation of Wastewater "-laster Plan. Utilizing the findings of the Wastewater
Master Plan and recommendations of the Water Quality Steering Committee relating to Hot Spots do the following:
retine and prioritize areas identified as Hot Spots, detennine retrofit and funding requirements for priority Hot Spots
and cesspit replacement for areas outside those areas identified for central or cluster wastewater collection systems, and
begin developing facility plans for priority Hot Spots. Execute interagency agreements to define facility plan, design
and construction schedules for each Hot Spot facility. Establish a water quality monitoring program to document the
reduction in nutrients as a result of these facilities. Complete a wastewater treatment finance plan and a service area
implementation plan, and continue efforts to secure funding for Wastewater Master Plan implementation, with priority
given to Hot Spots. Detennine the feasibility and legal ramifications of establishing an escrow account as a means of
providing long-term tunding for replacing cesspits or substandard onsite sewage systems. Establish a mechanism such
as special assessments, impact fees, infrastructure surcharge, or other dedicated revenues, to fund the local share of
wastewater improvements in Years Four and Five. Seek to provide comparable subsidies for both wastewater collection
systems and individual cesspit replacement.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DCA, DEP, DOH, SFWMD, EPA and Water Quality Protection Program Steering
Committee (WQSC).
B. Secure funding for Storm Water Master Plan development, contract selected firm for development of Master
Plan, and complete Phase I (data collection). Detennine the feasibility of providing nutrient reduction credits for
stormwater improvements.
Agencies: County, DCA, DOT, SFWMD, EPA and WQSC.
C. Conclude acquisition of North Key Largo Hammocks CARL project. Make offers to 33% of remaining private
owners with property located in other CARL project boundaries.
Agencies: County, Land Authority and DEP.
D. Secure remaining funds for the carrying capacity study, conduct workshops as outlined in the Scope of Work,
select prime contractor, and initiate Phase I (data collection) of the study.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, WQSC, SFRPC, EPA, USFWS, Army COE, and
other interested parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
E. Continue etTorts to secure funding for the Marathon Facility. Complete Little Venice construction design, secure
lands needed for Little Venice facility, and begin bid process and selection of construction firm. Design a water quality
monitoring program to document Little Venice project impacts.
Agencies: County. FKAA, DCA, DEP. WQSC. and EPA.
F. Continue cesspit identification by providing notice to all property owners with unknown systems. outside of Hot
Spots. Initiate replacement of cesspits outside of Hot Spots. A ward financial assistance grants to qualified applicants
using FY 1997-98 state fill1ds to ensure a minimum of 70 cesspit replacements. Develop a low interest loan and grant
program to assist all residents in replacing cesspits. with priority of funds going, in order of preference. to very low-.
low- and moderate-income households. Investigate the appropriateness of transterring credits among ROGO areas and
awarding nutrient reduction credits tor future committed water quality treatment facilities.
3
Agencies: County. DC A, FKAA. WQSC and DOH.
G. Document the extent and quality of the fresh groundwater lens system on Big Pine Key; delineate the associated
recharge areas: and determine the safe yield of the system. (Ref. County pol. 103.1.5)
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, DCA, SFWMD, EPA, WQSC and USFWS.
H. Develop an integrated funding plan for the purchase of land from ROGO applicants who have competed
unsuccessfully for four consecutive years and applied for administrative relief.
Agencies: County.
/. The County, in conjunction with DCA. shall assess the feasibility of applying the nutrient reduction credit
requirement to new commercial development.
Agencies: County and DCA.
YEAR FOUR (July 13,2000 through July 12,2001).
A. Continue implementation of Wastewater Master Plan, execute interagency agreements to define construction
schedule by phases, and continue developing facility plans for selected Hot Spots in each ROGO area. Secure funding
to implement the Wastewater ~Iaster Plan. Document that reduction in nutrients has been achieved within each of the
sub-areas.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DCA, DEP, DOH, EPA and WQSC.
B. Complete Storm Water Master Plan. Identify priority projects for implementation and seek funding for plan
implementation.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOT, SFWMD, EPA and WQSC.
C. Make offers to 50% of remaining private owners with property located in CARL project boundaries.
Agencies: County, Land Authority and DEP.
D. Complete Phase II of the carrying capacity study (data analysis) and present initial recommendations to review
agencies.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, WQSC, SFRPC, EPA, USFWS, Army CaE, and
other interested parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
E. Establish baseline water quality for surface and groundwater quality potentially impacted by Little Venice
project.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, FKAA, WQSC and EPA.
F. Complete cesspit identification and continue cesspit replacement outside of Hot Spots. with a priority of funds
going, in order of preference, to low- and moderate-income households; ensure that a minimum of 88 cesspits are
replaced.
Agencies: County, FKAA, WQSC and DOH.
YEAR FIVE (July 13, 2001 through July 12,2002).
A. Continue implementation of the Wastewater Master Plan pursuant to executed interagency agreements. Begin
construction of wastewater facilities in selected Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DCA, DOH, DEP, EP A, and WQSC.
B. Execute interagency agreements to define construction schedule for selected storm water improvement projects.
Complete land acquisition and final design for selected treatment strategies for Storm Water Master Plan.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOT, WQSC and SFWMD.
C. Conclude negotiations with all willing owners 'Nith property within CARL project boundaries. Acquire a total-
to-date of 45% of the Key Deer/Coupon Bight project and 25% of the Florida Keys Ecosystems project from willing
se Ilers.
Agencies: County, Land Authority, and DEP.
D. Complete final draft of the carrying capacity study including acceptance by review agencies.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DCA, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC. SFW\fD, WQSC, SFRPC. EPA. USFWS, Army
COE. and other interested parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
E. Continue eliminating cesspits and inoperative septic tanks in areas outside of Hot Spots.
4
Agencies: County, DOH, FKAA and WQSC.
YEAR SIX (July 13,2002 through July 12,2003).
A. Continue construction of waste\\ater facilities in Hot Spots begun in previous year. Contract to design and
construct additional wastewater treatment facilities in Hot Spots in accordance with the schedule of the Wastewater
\Iaster Plan. Continue implementation of Wastewater \Iaster Plan with emphasis on Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, DOH, DCA, EPA and WQSC.
B. Initiate construction of selected projects as identified in the Storm Water \Iaster Plan.
Agencies: County, SFW\fD, DEP, DCA, DOT, EPA and WQSC.
C. Implement the carrying capacity study by, among other things, the adoption of all necessary plan amendments to
establish a rate of growth and a set of development standards that ensure that any and all new development does not
exceed the capacity of the county's environment and marine system to accommodate additional impacts. Plan
amendments will include a review of the County's Future Land Use Map series and changes to the map series and the
"as of right" and "maximum" densities authorized for the plan's future land use categories based upon the natural
character of the land and natural resources that ""ould be impacted by the currently authorized land uses, densities and
intensities.
Agencies: County, FKAA, FFWCC, DCA, DEP, DOH, DOT, SFWMD, SFRPC, EPA, Army CaE, WQSC, and
USFWS, and other interested parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and development
interests.
D. Complete the elimination of all cesspits in areas outside of Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DOH and WQSC.
E. Develop a Keys-wide master land acquisition plan which shall include:
(I) A strategy for the acquisition of those properties which should be preserved due to their habitat value as well as
those other properties where future development is to be discouraged,
(2) A management plan for implementing the strategy, and
(3) A reasonable, feasible plan for securing funding for said land acquisition.
Agencies: County, Land Authority, DCA, DEP, SFWMD, Army CaE, EPA, USFWS and other interested parties
to include representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
F. Initiate and complete a collaborative process for the adoption of land development regulations, and/or
comprehensive plan amendments as needed, that will strengthen the protection of terrestrial habitat through processes
such as the Pennit Allocation System and permitting processes, and the preservation and maintenance of affordable
housing stock.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, FFWC, CSFWS, and other interested parties to include representatives of
environmental organizations and development interests.
YEAR SEVEN (July 13,2003 through July 12.2004).
A. Finalize construction and begin operating wastewater facilities III Hot Spots. Continue implementation of
Wastewater Master Plan with continued emphasis on Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, DCA, DOH, EP A and WQSC.
B. Continue implementing selected projects as identified in the Storm Water Master Plan.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, DOT, SFWMD. EPA and WQSC.
The Work Program in Policy 101.2.13 for Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10 shall be established as follows:
YEAR EIGHT (July 13,2004 through July 12,2005).
A. Review and revise (as necessary) the Conservation and Natural Areas \Iap.
Agencies: County, CSFWS, FWCC, DEP, DCA
B. Initiate acquisition strategy for lands identified outside the Conservation and :\atural Areas identified as worthy
of protection.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP
5
C. Begin public hearings for Conservation and Natural Areas boundaries.
Agencies: County
D. Conclude public hearings for the adoption of the amended Conservation and Natural Areas Boundaries.
Agencies: County
E. Adopt an ordinance to implement a moratorium on ROGOiNROGO applications that involves the clearing of
any portion of an upland tropical hardwood hammock or pine lands habitat contained in a tropical hardwood hammock
or pinelands patch of two or more acres in size located within a Conservation and Natural Area.
Agencies: County, DCA
F. Adopt amendments to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations to enact overlay designations,
and eliminate or revise the Habitat Evaluation Index. and modify the ROGnNROGO system to guide development
away from environmentally sensitive lands.
Agencies: County, DCA
G. Amend land development regulations to prohibit the designation of Conservation and Natural Areas (Tier I) as a
receiver site for ROGO exempt development from sender sites; and to further limit clearing of upland native habitat that
may occur in the Natural Areas (Tier I) and the Transition and Sprawl Reduction Area (Tier II) upon designation by the
County.
Agencies: County, DCA
H. Develop Land Acquisition and Management Master Plan and address both funding and management strategies.
Agencies: County, DCA, DEP, USFWS, FWCC
L Provide $40 million in financing secured by infrastructure tax for wastewater facilities.
Agencies: County
J. Begin construction of wastewater plants or laying of collection lines for Baypoint, Conch Key and Key Largo
Trailer Village/Key Largo Park.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, Key Largo Wastewater District
K. Ensure the connection for up to 1,350 EDVs at Stock Island to Key West Resort Utilities.
Agencies: County, DEP
L. Complete lower Keys and Key Largo Feasibility Study.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP
M. Complete projects identified in the Stormwater :\lanagement Master Plan.
Agencies: County. DEP, DCA
N. Evaluate and implement strategies to ensure that affordable housing remains affordable in perpetuity for future
generations. Establish a partnership with non-profit organizations in order to construct affordable housing using
additional state funds.
Agencies: County, FHFC, DCA
O. Identify potential acquisition sites for affordable housing proposals and include in the Land Acquisition Master
Plan.
Agencies: County, FHFC, DCA
P. Provide up to $10 million in bond financing from the Tourist Impact Tax for acquisition of land for workforce
housing and affordable housing sites.
Agencies: County
Q. Complete a comprehensive analysis of hurricane evacuation issues in the Florida Keys and develop strategies to
reduce actual hurricane clearance times and thereby reduce potential loss of life from hurricanes.
Agencies: County, DCA
YEAR NINE (July 13,2005 through July 12,20(6).
A. In coordination with the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority and the Key Largo Sewer District, initiate the process
to obtain S80 million in bond financing secured by connection tees.
Agencies: County. FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
B. Secure site for lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater facilities.
6
Agencies: County, FKAA
YEAR TEN (July 13,2006 through July 12,2007).
A. A ward contract tor design, construction and operation tor the 100ver Keys and Key Largo \vastewater facilities.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
B. Begin construction of the lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater plants.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sevv<er District
C. Initiate connections to lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater systems.
Agencies: County. FKAA, Key Largo Se\ver District
D. Complete construction and hookups for Baypoint, Conch Key and Key Largo Trailer Village/Key Largo Park.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
E. Obtain $80 million in bond financing secured by connection fees.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
7
380.0552 Florida Keys Area; protection and designation as area of critical state concern.-
(7) PRL'\JCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT.--State, regional, and local agencies and
units of government in the Florida Keys Area shall coordinate their plans and conduct their
programs and regulatory activities consistent with the principles for guiding development as set
forth in chapter 27F-8, Florida Administrative Code, as amended effective August 23, 1984,
\\hich chapter is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference. For the purposes of
reviewing consistency of the adopted plan or any amendments to that plan with the principles for
guiding development and any amendments to the principles, the principles shall be constmed as
a whole and no specific provision shall be constmed or applied in isolation from the other
provisions. However, the principles for guiding development as set forth in chapter 27F-8,
Florida Administrative Code, as amended effective August 23, 1984, are repealed 18 months
from July 1, 1986. After repeal, the following shall be the principles with which any plan
amendments must be consistent:
(a) To strengthen local government capabilities for managing land use and development so
that local government is able to achieve these objectives without the continuation of the area
of critical state concern designation.
(b) To protect shoreline and marine resources, including mangroves, coral reef formations,
seagrass beds, wetlands, fish and wildlife, and their habitat.
(c) To protect upland resources, tropical biological communities, freshwater wetlands, native
tropical vegetation (for example, hardwood hammocks and pinelands), dune ridges and
beaches, wildlife, and their habitat.
(d) To ensure the maximum well-being of the Florida Keys and its citizens through sound
economic development.
( e) To limit the adverse impacts of development on the quality of water throughout the
Florida Keys.
(f) To enhance natural scenic resources, promote the aesthetic benefits of the natural
environment, and ensure that development is compatible with the unique historic character of
the Florida Keys.
(g) To protect the historical heritage of the Florida Keys.
(h) To protect the value, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and amortized life of existing and
proposed major public investments, including:
1. The Florida Keys Aqueduct and water supply facilities;
2. Sewage collection and disposal facilities;
3. Solid waste collection and disposal facilities;
4. Key West Naval Air Station and other military facilities;
5. Transportation facilities;
2
. t',
6. Federal parks, wildlife refuges, and marine sanctuaries;
7. State parks, recreation facilities, aquatic preserves, and other publicly owned
properties;
8. City electric service and the Florida Keys Electric Co-op; and
9. Other utilities, as appropriate.
(i) To limit the adverse impacts of public investments on the environmental resources of the
Florida Keys.
U) To make available adequate affordable housing for all sectors of the population of the
Florida Keys.
(k) To provide adequate alternatives for the protection of public safety and welfare in the
event of a natural or manmade disaster and for a postdisaster reconstruction plan.
(1) To protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and
maintain the Florida Keys as a unique Florida resource.
3
Trivette-Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mayte. Santamaria@dca.state.f1.us
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:23 AM
Trivette-And rew; feag inc@ci.marathon.fl.us; edward. koconis@islamorada. fl. us
Rebecca.Jetton@dca.state.fl.us
Dedesignation Report information
We have received multiple questions regarding what to report to the Department for the Removal of Designation report
due to the Administration Commission this year. Rebecca Jetton has provided this draft list to assist you with drafting your
report. Other items may be added in the near future and, if so, we will send a follow-up email. We thank you for your
assistance in this process.
If you have any questions, please contact Rebecca Jetton at (850) 922-1766.
Dedesignation Report - Information to include:
Work Tasks that relate to your community and/or any progress you wish to report for your city, as related to the
Principles for Guiding Development for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern
Number of ROGO/permits issued (affordable vs. market rate) - (RaGa tracking)
ROGO queue (how many applicants for market rate and affordable)
Beneficial Use tracking - c"v- '-t yc..r) " :-Ro('D
Number of Affordable Housing ROGOs available (in pool)
Number of allocated but un-built affordable units
Number ofRV's and/or transient units converted to affordable housing -Or" 8. h . '~I ~
Land Acquisition and funding sources I
Amount of land in public ownership
Amount of habitat planned to be acquired vs. habitat needed to be acquired
Wastewater service areas, maps, schedule to complete, funding sources
Storm water outfalls and schedule to complete & funding
Capacity analysis of facilities (sub-basins)
Analysis of acreage in each FLUM category and the development potential (Number of units or FAR that could
be built based on assigned density within each FLUM)
Number oflive-aboards and/or floating structures
1/., I . ..-;; r \. c.-\. +- 6n:-'---') D-' "-::>\- w \...... ~ir- ...; '-- ~
~#""\...,..... ~....... . :\-
Ada Mayte Santamaria b(... '-- l).so ~ ..... 6,... Do< L Jo-.-- o\... l..l '- dr...J L....: 1-..)
Community Planner ~~~"l>'-- h\L.:> \..J\....... ................._~6l:.0 b)~\....- "...(..~~t'''
DCA, Areas of Critical State Concern
Tel: 850.488.4725, Fax: 850.488.3309 fv AJ.,.,.t............q- bv.J <1 'yC-f
mavte.santamaria@dca.state.f1.us rt<. u 5p.....CC5 +0 t-_ \
The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more,
visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDruQCard.com or call toll-free 1-966-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630.
Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure.
IIr';'I:~; ~- ;:,L (or ;?">>f7V"'{y ,;- f-,..,): 0- S~""""L(.S
County of Monroe
Growth Management Division
Office of the Director
2798 Overseas Highway
Suite #400
Marathon, FL 33050
Voice: (305) 289-2517
FAX: (305) 289-2854
l;~,~~I::>:':\
1/o~ I 'I' \h
PH, ., v\ II~
-; , ,I iJ-:'
\'t:'.':n IJ!lfJl
'\\k';t~~~:~~~;,;,~,~!;V
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
Board of County Commissioners
Mayor Mario DiGennaro, Dist. 4
Mayor Pro Tern Charles "Sonny" McCoy, Dist. 3
George Neugent, Dist. 2
Dixie Spehar, Dist. 1
Sylvia J. Murphy, Dist. 5
June 11,2008
Mr. Craig Diamond
Department of Community Affairs
Chief of State Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: Removal of Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Designation from Monroe County
Dear Mr. Diamond:
Thank you for your letter dated January 28, 2008, requesting Monroe County's assistance in
meeting the Department's requirement for submission of a "Removal of Designation" report for
the Florida Keys. This report will be describing in detail the progress of the Florida Keys area in
accomplishing the tasks of the work program as defined in Rule 28-20.110 of the Florida
Administrative Code. We understand that you will be submitting this report between July 12 and
August 30, 2008, to the Administration Commission.
The Department's report and its corresponding recommendations are of extreme importance to
Monroe County and its municipalities. Pursuant to Florida Statute 380.0552 this report shall
stand as evidence supporting the de-designation or the continued designation of the Florida Keys
as one of four (4) Areas of Critical State Concern (ACSC). The statute continues to stipulate that
if de-designation does not occur, as a result of this report, on October 1, 2009 the Department
shall submit a supplemental report by November 1 of each year until de-designation is achieved.
Florida Statute 380.0552 further requires that the recommendation for continued designation or
removal of the designation be based on substantial progress toward the completion of the 10 year
Work Program as set forth in Rule 28-20.110, Florida Administrative Code. The Florida
Administration Commission established a five year work program for Monroe County as an Area
of Critical State Concern in a revised rule established in December of 1996. This work program
was later extended an additional five years, creating the 10 year work program.
We feel that Monroe County has made substantial progress toward the implementation of the
Work Program. However, we freely admit that Monroe County has not completed all of the
objectives included within the Work Program. We recognize that the Department and the
Administration Commission may want to continue the Area of Critical State Concern designation
for the Florida Keys, and we contend that this action will require a statutory amendment and the
establishment of additional criteria for removal of the designation.
The County and our partner, the State of Florida, have taken a critical step together toward the
completion of the Work Program through the approval of the long awaited legislation
establishing a dedicated funding mechanism for the implementation of wastewater
infrastructure. We are confident that, with the recent provision of 200 million dollars committed
to the Florida Keys wastewater projects, the State of Florida has removed the only hurdle
remaining in the pathway for completion of these projects throughout the Florida Keys. Monroe
County and our wastewater partners are extremely grateful for the efforts of our legislative
representatives and our Governor to provide this crucial assistance to protect our most
important resources.
We look forward to your recommendation and appreciate the opportunity to assist the
Department in the development of its report. Please find attached the Monroe County Area of
Critical State Concern De-designation Report.
Sincerely, M /)
~ ' (I
/~</-:? "! "" -,--
/;:./i1.--("JL>L--G .. /~
,-
Mario DiGennaro
Monroe County Mayor
<2c;-J / /)
/ /7r
Roman Gastesi) Jr.
Monroe County Administrator
MD & RGjaot
Attachments: Monroe County Area of Critical State Concern De-designation Report
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
MONROE COUNTY
AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
DE-DESIGNATION REPORT
FINAL DOCUMENT
Aclrnowledgements:
Rich Jones, Senior Administrator Marine Resources Office
Tiffany Stankiewicz, Senior Planning Technician
Mayra Tezanos, Executive Assistant to the Growth Management Director
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
3
Background on Report Preparation
3
Work Program Discussion
3
Additional Data Request
4
Comprehensive Work Program Analysis
5
Year One
Year Two
Year Three
Year Four
Year Five
Year Six
Year Seven
Year Eight
Year Nine
Year Ten
5
9
11
18
22
25
30
31
37
38
Comprehensive Work Program Analysis Summary
41
Conclusion
44
Attachments
45
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 2
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Introduction
Florida Statute 380.0552 establishes the procedure by which the Florida Administration
Commission shall remove the Area of Critical State Concern designation from Monroe County
and the Florida Keys. The action of removal shall be based on a report and corresponding
recommendation from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the Department). This
report shall detail the areas of progress toward completion of the 10 Year Work Program as set
forth in rule 28-20.110 of the Florida Administrative Code on January 1, 2006 excluding any
amendments that took effect after that date. The Department's report shall be prepared and
submitted to the Administration Commission between July 12, 2008 and August 30, 2008. The
Department has requested that many state agencies, local governments and partners provide a
comprehensive analysis of progress to date. This report has been prepared in response to that
request.
Background on Report Preparation
Substantial progress is the measurement of success assigned by the statutes for the
implementation and completion of the work program. This measurement has been used in each
of the annual reports from Monroe County to the Department. The annual reports then serve as
the basis for a decision by the Administration Commission to determine if "substantial progress"
has or has not been made for that year. This same measurement of success applies to the removal
of designation. Unfortunately, the term "substantial progress" is not defined, which creates a
platform for disagreement between the affected parties.
Monroe County, in an attempt to address this deficiency in the legislation, has prepared this
comprehensive review of work toward implementation and completion of the 10 Year Work
Program (the Program) through the consideration of percentages. The Program includes
objectives which are multifaceted and stretch multiple years but culminate in completion of one
document or facility. Each objective is considered independently and shall be counted toward a
total percentage of completion for that year. The percentage complete for each year is then
averaged to provide a percentage complete for the entire scope of the 10 Year Work Program. We
have provided as attachments the additional requested data as well as summary memorandums of
analysis.
Work Program Discussion
The work program resulted from the first Monroe County Comprehensive Plan being found not in
compliance following submission in 1993 by the Department. An Administrative Hearing was
held to review the validity of the Department's finding and process for determining compliance in
October of 1994. In 1995, the Administration Commission entered a final order concurring with
the finding of the Department and noticing a proposed rule which would address outstanding
compliance issues. In January of 1996, 95% of Monroe County's Comprehensive Plan became
effective and the amended rule was introduced containing the Five (5) Year Work Program. This
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 3
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Five (5) Year work Program was then expanded to 10 Years and contains a variety of objectives
aimed at the key elements for growth control and responsible community planning. The work
program addresses habitat protection, carrying capacity and concurrency as well as infrastructure
development.
Additional Data Request
This report was prepared in response to a January 28, 2008 letter from the Florida Department of
Community Affairs. This letter from Mr. Craig Diamond, Chief of State Planning, to then Mayor
Charles "Sonny" McCoy requested a "written report including data and analysis on all Work
Program tasks relating to Monroe County". This initial request was augmented by a following
email from Mayte Santamaria, Community Planner. This email requested the following:
Work Tasks that relate to your community and/or any progress you wish to reportfor your city, as
related to the Principles for Guiding Development for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern
Number of ROGO/permits issued (affordable vs. market rate) - (ROGO tracking)
ROGO queue (how many applicants for market rate and affordable)
Beneficial Use tracking
Number of Affordable Housing ROGOs available (in pool)
Number of allocated but un-built affordable units
Number ofRV's and/or transient units converted to affordable housing *
Land Acquisition and funding sources
Amount of land in public ownership
Amount of habitat planned to be acquired vs. habitat needed to be acquired
Wastewater service areas, maps, schedule to complete, funding sources
Stormwater outfalls and schedule to complete & funding
Capacity analysis offacilities (sub-basins)
Analysis of acreage in each FLUM category and the development potential (Number of units or FAR
that could be built based on assigned density within each FLUM)
Number of live-a boards and/or floating structures
* No attachment included because no conversions have occurred as of this date.
This information is provided as attachments along with the previously requested data supporting
Work Program progress attached as appendices.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 4
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Comprehensive Work Program Analysis
YEAR ONE (ending December 31. 1997)
OBJECTIVE A:
Complete Phase I (data collection) for the Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans,
and secure funding for plan completion. (Reference County Objective. 901.4)
Agencies; County, Department, DEP, HRS and SFWMD.
County Response:
In March of 1996 Monroe County began a process to complete the Sanitary Wastewater Master
Plan. In June of that year a Request for Qualifications was advertised to which three vendors
responded. The firm of CH2MHill was formally selected by the BOCC in July of 1996 to complete
the Master Plan. Phase 1 data collection consisted of 11 technical memoranda to be prepared and
submitted by the selected vendor, CH2MHill. The following table indicates the completion date
of each memorandum:
Table 1: Phase 1 Data Collection and Technical Memoranda Completion Dates
Monroe County
Memoranda Number Memoranda Title Completion Date Sanitary Wastewater
Master Plan Location
1 Evaluation of Existing Data Bases 7-0ct-97 Volume 3
2 Master Wastewater Database 9-Dec-98 Volume 3
development
3 Wastewater Flow Analysis 27-Jul-99 Volume 3
Analysis of Wastewater Derived
4 Nutrients from Developed Land Based 17-Sep-99 Volume 3
Areas of the Keys
5 Evaluation of Existing Wastewater 23-Jan-98 Volume 4
Facilities
6 Collection System Alternatives 20-Dec-99 Volume 4
7 Technology Assessment of Onsite 11-Jun-98 Volume 4
Wastewater Treatment Systems
Assessment of Secondary and
8 Advanced Wastewater Treatment 8-Dec-98 Volume 4
Tech nologies
Assessment of Wastewater Treatment
8s Costs to Provide Phosphorus Removal 8-Dec-98 Volume 4
Only
9 Effluent Management Technologies 15-Apr-98 Volume 4
10 Solids Management Technologies 24-Aug-98 Volume 4
11 Wastewater Facilities Siting Analysis 9-Mar-OO Volume 5
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 5
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Following a lengthy preparation period, Monroe County selected the firm of Camp, Dresser and
McKee Inc. in 1999 to complete the Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan. Phase
1 data collection consisted of eight (8) technical documents; the majority of which were
completed between 2000 and 2001 and submitted to Monroe County as a part of the Monroe
County Stormwater Management Master Plan in February of 2001.
OBJECTIVE B:
Complete a conceptual plan or scope of work to develop a carrying capacity. The carrying
capacity analysis shall be designed to determine the ability of the Florida Keys ecosystem,
and the various segments thereof, to withstand all impacts of additional land development
activities. The analysis shall be based upon the findings adopted by the Administration
Commission on December 12, 1995, or more recent data that may become available in the
course of the study, and shall be based upon benchmark of, and all adverse impacts to the
Keys land and water natural systems, in addition to the impact of nutrients on marine
resources. The carrying capacity analysis shall consider aesthetic, socioeconomic
(including sustainable tourism), quality of life and community character issues, including
the concentration of population, the amount of open space, diversity of habitats, and
species richness. The analysis shall reflect the interconnected nature of the Florida Keys'
natural systems, but may consider and analyze the carrying capacity of specific islands or
groups of islands and specific ecosystems of habitats, including distinct parts of the Keys'
marine system. (Ref. 1991 Stip. Settlement Agreement)
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, HRS, DOT, GFC, SFWMD, NMS, SFRPC,
EPA, USFW, ACOE, and other interested parties to includes representatives of
environmental organizations and development interests.
County Response:
The development of a scope of work for the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study began in earnest
in 1996. The establishment of both a Technical Advisory Committee and a Steering Committee
helped to guide the development of the core structure. Following two initial drafts, a third draft
became the finalized Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study Scope of Work at the conclusion of
peer review in September of 1998.
OBJECTIVE C:
Complete A WT /OSDS demonstration study and initiate rule making for new standards for
OSDS. (Reference County Policy 901+3).
Agencies: HRS.
County Response:
Technical Memorandum 7 (Technology Assessment of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems)
and 8 (Assessment of Secondary and Advanced Wastewater Treatment Technologies) were
completed in June and December of 1998.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 6
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE D:
Complete Marathon Facilities Plan and secure funding for the facility site(s). The
wastewater facilities plan should implement the most cost effective method of
collecting, treating, and disposing of wastewater and shall include an investigation of
the feasibility of using alternative nutrient-stripping on-site disposal systems. The
development of the facilities plan shall be a component of the wastewater Master Plan as
that Plan is developed.
Agencies: County, Department, and DEP.
County response:
CH2MHILL completed and submitted the Wastewater Facilities Plan with Phased
Implementation for the Marathon Area of the Florida Keys to the Monroe County BOCC in April
of 1998. The Marathon Area Wastewater System Funding Proposal was completed and presented
to the BOCC in February of1998.
OBJECTIVE E:
Continue cesspit elimination program with identification of Hot Spots as first priority in
accordance with Objective 901.2 and seek funding for cesspit identification. Enter into
an inter-local agreement with HRS to specify the responsibilities and procedures for the
OSDS inspection/compliance program as required by Policy 901.2.3. Adopt an ordinance
which specifies the implementation procedures for the OSDS inspection/compliance
program. The ordinance shall include authorization for HRS to inspect wastewater
treatment systems on private property as required by Policy 901.2.3. (Reference County
Objective 901.2).
County Response:
In 1997 Monroe County adopted ordinance 03-1997 requiring the identification and elimination of
cesspools. This ordinance requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant
must obtain an operating permit from the Health Department and establishes an inspection
program to ensure compliance with operational standards. Monroe County agreed to establish an
MOU with the Department requiring that all new development be concurrent with the
elimination of cesspools. Monroe County also entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
with the Department of Health outlining the shared responsibilities regarding the identification
and elimination of cesspools and other unknown on-site wastewater systems.
OBJECTIVE F:
Submit status of CARL and ROGO land acquisition to the Administration Commission.
Agencies: County, Land Authority, and DEP.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 7
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
In December of 1997 Monroe County's Growth Management Division submitted a report on the
status of the five year work program and the financial implications for the implementation of the
Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Included in this document is the CARL and RaGa
land acquisition update for that work year.
OBJECTIVE G:
Revise the Habitat Evaluation Index (HEI) based on peer review.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, FFWCC, and Federal agencies.
County Response:
On August 19, 1997 the BOCC approved a contract with Lewis Environmental Services, Inc. to
develop revisions to the HE!. Initial peer review was held in October of 1997. The final document
was completed and rendered as a deliverable to Monroe County December 21, 1998.
Year One Summary
Year one (1) of the work program consisted of objectives A through G and ranged in variety from
growth control initiatives to wastewater implementation. Monroe County's progress report,
submitted in December of 1997, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the
work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year one.
Table 2: Year One Objective Completion
Percentage Percentage
Year One Objective Complete (Work Complete
Year) (Comprehensive)
A 20% 100%
B 50% 100%
C 0% 100%
D 95% 100%
E 100% 100%
F 100% 100%
G 50% 100%
Year One Objective
Completion 59% 100%
Averages
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 8
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
YEAR TWO (ending December 31. 1998)
OBJECTIVE A:
Complete the Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans and execute interagency
agreements to define construction schedule by phases. Document that significant
reduction in nutrients will be achieved each year thereafter within each sub-area. The
Master Plans shall include facility plans for all proposed treatment strategies, and
determine retrofit and funding requirements for Hot Spots and cesspit identified in D
below.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, and HRS.
County Response:
The Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan was not completed until February of
2001. At the conclusion of year two (2) of the work program Monroe County submitted its annual
report detailing progress for that year of the work program. The County recognized the
substantial delay in completion of this plan and recommended that the work program be
amended to incorporate a more realistic schedule for completion. In this report the projected
completion date is stated as being December of 2000.
The Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan was completed and rendered to the BOCC
in May of 2000. The annual progress report for year two (2) of the work program stated that the
plan was 50% complete and indicated a proposed completion date in March of 2000. The
completed plan does address facility plans, Hot Spot funding requirements, and cesspit
elimination.
OBJECTIVE B:
Secure funding for the carrying capacity study and initiate Phase I (data collection) of
the study.
Agencies: County, Department, and DEP.
County Response:
The Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study (FKCCS) was jointly sponsored by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Funding of the
study was authorized through Congressional action passing the Water Resources Development
Act in 1996.
Completion of the FKCCS was governed by delivery orders issued by the ACOE. Each delivery
order was specific in the required deliverable but often allowed the completion dates to run the
entire length of time required for project completion. Phase 1 data collection was a component of
delivery orders one (1) and two (2) which engaged a technical contractor (URS Corporation) and
required the collection of relevant existing study data as well as literature review for terrestrial
and marine ecosystems and species. These tasks were completed in February of 2000.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 9
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE C:
Complete cesspit ID process in Hot Spots, excluding the Marathon area.
Agencies: County, Department, and HRS.
County Response:
As stated above, in 1997 Monroe County adopted ordinance 03-1997 requiring the identification
and elimination of cesspools. This ordinance requires that prior to the issuance of a building
permit the applicant must obtain an operating permit from the Health Department and
establishes an inspection program to ensure compliance with operational standards. Monroe
County also agreed to establish an MOU with the Department requiring that all new development
be concurrent with the elimination of cesspools. Monroe County also entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Health outlining the shared
responsibilities regarding the identification and elimination of cesspools and other unknown on-
site wastewater systems.
In Monroe County's annual report for year two (2) of the work program the County identified that
the progress in identifYing systems was slow and recommended that the work program be revised
to reflect a more realistic schedule for completion. The report also recognized a potential
completion time line of 12 years.
OBJECTIVE D:
Submit status of CARL and ROGO land acquisition to the Administration Commission.
Agencies County, Land Authority, and DEP
County Response:
In December of 1999 Monroe County's Growth Management Division submitted a report on the
status of the five year work program and the financial implications for the implementation of the
Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Included in this document is the CARL and ROGO
land acquisition update for that work year as required by the work program.
OBJECTIVE E:
Document the extent and quality of the fresh groundwater lens system on Big Pine Key;
delineate the associated recharge areas; and determine the safe yield of the system.
(Reference County Policy 103.1.5).
Agencies: County, Department, SFWMD, USFWS
County Response:
With South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as lead for the project and assistance
from the Monroe County Stormwater Project Manager the Big Pine Key Freshwater Lens Study
Group was formed. This group was tasked with data finding regarding the freshwater lens. This
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 10
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
effort culminated in the creation of the Big Pine Freshwater Lens System Report which was
completed by SFWMD personnel in April of 2000. This report clearly delineates the recharge
areas and indicates that a safe yield for this lens does not exist due to its seasonal variance.
Year Two Summary
Year two (2) of the work program consisted of objectives A through E. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in January of 1999, concluded that substantial progress had been made during
the work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year two.
Table 3: Year Two Objective Completion
Percentage
.. Percentage Complete
Year Two Objective (W k Y) Complete
or ear .
(Comprehensive)
A 50% 100%
B 100% 100%
C 10% 100%
D 100% 100%
E 0% 100%
Year One Objective
Completion Avg. 52% 100%
YEAR THREE (January 1, 1999 through July 12, 2000)
OBJECTIVE A:
Complete and begin implementation of Wastewater Master Plan. Utilizing the findings
of the Wastewater Master Plan and recommendations of the Water Quality Steering
Committee relating to Hot Spots do the following: refine and prioritize areas identified
as Hot Spots, determine retrofit and funding requirements for priority Hot Spots and
cesspit replacement for areas outside those areas identified for central or cluster
wastewater collection systems, and begin developing facility plans for priority Hot Spots.
Execute interagency agreements to define facility plan, design and construction
schedules for each Hot Spot facility. Establish a water quality monitoring program to
document the reduction in nutrients as a result of these facilities. Complete a
wastewater treatment finance plan and a service area implementation plan, and
continue efforts to secure funding for Wastewater Master Plan implementation, with
priority given to Hot Spots. Determine the feasibility and legal ramifications of
establishing an escrow account as a means of providing long-term funding for replacing
cesspits or substandard onsite sewage systems. Establish a mechanism such as special
assessments, impact fees, infrastructure surcharge, or other dedicated revenues, to fund
the local share of wastewater improvements in Years Four and Five. Seek to provide
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 11
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
comparable subsidies for both wastewater collection systems and individual cesspit
replacement.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Department, DEP, DOH, SFWMD, EPA and Water
Quality Protection Program Steering Committee (WQSC).
County Response:
The Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan was completed in early 2000 and was
adopted by the BOCC in May of 2000. The implementation of the plan is still underway and was
initiated subsequent interagency approvals late in 2000. The plan includes defined, ranked Hot
Spot areas scheduled to receive sanitary wastewater service. The plan also includes a funding plan
for the implementation of the plan objectives. The plan details the cost of cesspit elimination at
approximately 24 million dollars. The master plan also includes service planning for each of the
Hot Spot service areas.
Monroe County initiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Florida Keys
Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) on May 14, 1998 and the FKAA Board agreed the following week.
This MOU established the FKAA as the wastewater development authority for all of
unincorporated Monroe County leaving Monroe County as the financiers. The Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), in April of 2000, agreed to provide a water
quality monitoring program for the Little Venice project area. The FDEP also prepared a
memorandum in May of 2000 that supported the establishment of escrow accounts as long term
funding means for wastewater infrastructure financing.
Monroe County has actively secured various sources of revenue to supply the local share of
wastewater infrastructure costs including increased tourist taxes, impact fees, special assessments,
and taxing districts. The County along with state partners initiated the Homeowners Wastewater
Assistance Program in November of 1999 which established a grant opportunity for financial
assistance in the replacement of cesspits or other wastewater systems outside of Hot Spots in an
amount approximate to 62% of the total cost for replacement with a 2010 compliant wastewater
treatment system. The program was initially funded by approximately one (1) million dollars of
capital improvement fund monies (fund 304) and an additional 300,000 dollars from the Growth
Management Fund (148). While this grant program is no longer funded the mechanism remains
as a viable option for providing financial assistance to areas outside of the central waste water
servIce areas.
OBJECTIVE B:
Secure funding for Storm Water Master Plan development, contract selected firm for
development of Master Plan, and complete Phase I (data collection). Determine the
feasibility of providing nutrient reduction credits for stormwater improvements.
Agencies: County, Department, DOT, SFWMD, EP A and WQSC.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 12
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
The approximate total cost of the Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan was
800,000 dollars. This cost was financed jointly by the FDEP and Monroe County. The FDEP
contributed 400,000 dollars of the cost while Monroe County funded their half through the
municipal taxing district funds.
Phase 1 data collection included eight (8) technical documents identified as Task 1. The data
collection was completed in early 1999 and was assembled following analysis for submission to
Monroe County in 2001.
In a memorandum dated March 30,2000 the County's consultant, Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc.,
stated that the potential of issuing a cesspit credit for the completion of stormwater improvement
projects was sound. However, in a subsequent memorandum from SFWMD the District identified
three significant disadvantages to this program. These disadvantages included:
1) No net reduction in nutrient discharge may exist
2) New discharge may occur in a different location
3) The potential future cost may be high for a retrofit solution
The disadvantages were considered to outweigh the advantages and the program was no longer
considered viable.
OBJECTIVE C:
Conclude acquisition of North Key Largo Hammocks CARL project. Make offers to 33%
of remaining private owners with property located in other CARL project boundaries.
Agencies: County, Land Authority and DEP.
County Response:
The final acquisition period for the North Key Largo Hammocks CARL project concluded in
September of 1999. With this last purchase offer going to the only areas remaining that had not
previously received an offer of purchase, Knowlson Colony and Gulfstream Shores subdivisions,
all private property owners of the acquisition area have had an opportunity to sell their property.
Presently 39 parcels consisting of 171.36 acres remain as privately owned vacant land within the
project area due to un-willing sellers.
The other defined CARL acquisition projects include the Florida Keys Ecosystem and Coupon
Bight/Key Deer Habitat Areas. Monroe County's report for work program progress within year
three (3) indicates that within the acquisition area for the Florida Keys Ecosystem project 53% of
the private property owners had received purchase offers before June of 2000. The report also
stated that within the Coupon Bight project area 40% of the private property owners have had at
least one purchase offer by June of 2000. These percentages exceed that required for year three
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 13
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
(3) of the work program. Presently, all private vacant land owners with the Coupon Bight project
area have received at least one (1) purchase offer from local or state government.
The CARL project expired in 2005 and in 2006 the successor program, Florida Forever, amended
the acquisition boundary to include areas throughout Monroe County including 99% of those
areas designated as Tier 1 by Monroe County. Currently, the Florida Forever acquisition boundary
encompases a total of 13,758 parcels which contain a total of 22,061 acres. Monroe County, the
State of Florida and the US Government all expend resources to retire development rights within
this acquisition area and at present a total of 2,277 parcels containing a total of 3,497 acres remain
private vacant land with the Florida Forever acquisition area or approximately 13% of the total
acquisition area.
OBJECTIVE D:
Secure remaining funds for the carrying capacity study, conduct workshops as outlined
in the Scope of Work, select prime contractor, and initiate Phase I (data collection) of
the study.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, WQSC,
SFRPC, EPA, USFWS, Army COE, and other interested parties to include
representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
County Response:
The approximate total cost of this study was six (6) million dollars the majority of which was
funded through the ACOE in 1996 through congressional action. The remainder of the required
funding was transferred to the ACOE from the State of Florida in 1999. The allotment of the
required funding allowed the ACOE to select a prime contractor. The ACOE chose the firm of
Dames and Moore and a contract was made final on October 5, 1999. Nine (9) workshops were
included within the finalized scope of work. The following table details the topic and completion
date for each workshop:
Phase 1 data collection was a component of delivery orders one (1) and two (2) which engaged a
technical contractor (URS Corporation) and required the collection of relevant existing study data
as well as literature review for terrestrial and marine ecosystems and species. These tasks were
completed in February of 2000.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 14
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Table 4: FKCCS Scope of Work Workshop Elements
Workshop Topic Completion Date
Study Framing
Study Mobilization
Ecosystems
Species
Land Development/Water
Quality/Wastewater
Land Development/Water
Quality/Wastewater
Water Circulation/Water Quality
Carrying Capacity Analysis Model
Scenario Workshop
May 6 & 7, 1999
June 3 & 4, 1999
July 7 & 8, 1999
August 5 & 6, 1999
August 25 & 26, 1999
September 23 & 24, 1999
October 13& 14, 1999
November 18 & 19, 1999
January 12 & 13, 2000
OBJECTIVE E:
Continue efforts to secure funding for the Marathon Facility. Complete Little Venice
construction design, secure lands needed for Little Venice facility, and begin bid process
and selection of construction firm. Design a water quality monitoring program to
document Little Venice project impacts.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Department, DEP, WQSC, and EPA.
County Response:
Monroe County and our wastewater partners, including the municipalities, districts, and state
agencies all continue to pursue every avenue for potential funding to complete central wastewater
infrastructure installation. The engineering firm of Boyle Engineering Corporation was hired in
1999 by the FKAA to complete design of the Little Venice Wastewater Treatment Facility. The
design was completed and accepted by the FKAA in late 2000. Following a multitude of public
hearings the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners approved the use of an area of the
Marathon Airport property for the Little Venice Wastewater Treatment Facility in late 1999. The
FKAA initiated a bid process and selected the construction firm of United Engineering
Corporation to implement the design and construct the facility for Little Venice. The facility was
completed in June 2004. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), in April
of 2000, agreed to provide a water quality monitoring program for the Little Venice project area.
OBJECTIVE F:
Continue cesspit identification by providing notice to all property owners with unknown
systems, outside of Hot Spots. Initiate replacement of cesspits outside of Hot Spots. Award
financial assistance grants to qualified applicants using FY 1997-98 state funds to ensure a
minimum of 70 cesspit replacements. Develop a low interest loan and grant program to
assist all residents in replacing cesspits with priority of funds going in order of preference,
to very low, low and moderate-income households. Investigate the appropriate point at
which nutrient reduction credits can be awarded for future committed water quality
treatment facilities and the appropriateness of transferring credits among ROGO areas.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 15
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Agencies: County, Department, FKAA, WQSC and DOH.
County Response:
Monroe County notified all property owners utilizing cesspools for wastewater disposal in January
of 2000 that their property was not meeting required operation standards and shall be upgraded
to a permitted On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS). Monroe County also
notified 188 property owners with unknown systems communicating the same information in
early 2000. Following receipt of this notification many of these owners immediately responded
with either permit information or entered into contracts for replacement.
In an effort to assist low and very low income households with replacement the Monroe County
Housing Authority provided financial assistance with removal and replacement of 89 cesspits
throughout Monroe County. This initial assistance program was replaced by the Homeowner
Wastewater Assistance Program. The County along with state partners initiated the Homeowners
Wastewater Assistance Program in November of 1999 which established a grant opportunity for
financial assistance in the replacement of cesspits or other wastewater systems outside of Hot
Spots in an amount approximate to 62% of the total cost for replacement with a 2010 compliant
wastewater treatment system. The program was initially funded by approximately one (1) million
dollars of capital improvement fund monies (fund 304) and an additional 300,000 dollars from the
Growth Management Fund (148). While this grant program is no longer funded the mechanism
remains as a viable option for providing financial assistance to areas outside of the central
wastewater service areas.
Commissioner Nora Williams, County Land Use Coordinator, established the Comprehensive
Work Plan Task Force in March of 1999. The task force was populated by 21 members from the
local, state and federal governments. This task force undertook issues that arose through the
implementation for the work program and the submission of the annual reports. One such issue
is the appropriate time to issue a cesspit credit during the development process. The task force
concluded that the appropriate time would be permit issuance for cesspit demolition not at the
conclusion of the work.
OBJECTIVE G:
Document the extent and quality of the fresh groundwater lens system on Big Pine Key;
delineate the associated recharge areas; and determine the safe yield of the system. (Ref.
County pol. 103.1.5)
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, Department, SFWMD, EPA, WQSC and USFWS.
County Response:
With South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as lead for the project and assistance
from the Monroe County Stormwater Project Manager the Big Pine Key Freshwater Lens Study
Group was formed. This group was tasked with data finding regarding the freshwater lens. This
effort culminated in the creation of the Big Pine Freshwater Lens System Report which was
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 16
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
completed by SFWMD personnel in April of 2000. This report clearly delineates the recharge
areas and indicates that a safe yield for this lens does not exist due to its seasonal variance.
OBJECTIVE H:
Develop an integrated funding plan for the purchase of land from RaGa applicants who
have competed unsuccessfully for four consecutive years and applied for administrative
relief.
Agencies: County.
County Response:
The Monroe County Land Authority is the agency responsible for purchase of land as directed by
the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners as a result of the administrative relief
process for RaGa. This process is funded through recurring revenue generated by taxation a
portion of which is reserved for Land Authority funding including acquisition. The original
estimates of need ranged from 400,000 to 3.5 million dollars. However, this estimate was
produced based on the planned termination date of RaGa on July 13, 2002. The extension of
RaGa into 2006 and the continuation of the administrative relief program into the future were
not addressed in this funding plan. Presently though, the program continues to function as
designed allowing Land Authority acquisitions to be adequately funded through recurring
revenues.
OBJECTIVE I:
The County, in conjunction with Department, shall assess the feasibility of applying the
nutrient reduction credit requirement to new commercial development.
Agencies: County and Department.
County Response:
The Department completed an analysis of expanding the nutrient credit program to include non-
residential development. This analysis is explained via memorandum and the Department in
conjunction with Monroe County staff concluded that while the expansion is feasible it is not
required. The non-residential moratorium in place at the time combined with the lack of interest
in non-residential development rendered the need for expansion null.
Year Three Summary
Year three (3) of the work program consisted of objectives A through 1. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in June of 2000, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the
work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year three.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 17
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Table 5: Year Three Objective Completion
Percentage Percentage
Year Three Objective Complete (Work Complete
Year) (Comprehensive)
A 100% 100%
B 100% 100%
C 100% 100%
D 100% 100%
E 100% 100%
F 100% 100%
G 100% 100%
H 100% 100%
I 100% 100%
Year Three Objective
Completion Averages 100% 100%
YEAR FOUR (July 13,2000 through July 12,2001)
OBJECTIVE A:
Continue implementation of Wastewater Master Plan, execute interagency agreements to
define construction schedule by phases, and continue developing facility plans for priority
Hot Spots in each RaGa area. Secure funding to implement the Wastewater Master Plan.
Document that reduction in nutrients has been achieved within each of the sub-areas.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Department, DEP, DOH, EPA and WQSC.
County Response:
As stated above, the Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan was completed in early
2000 and was adopted by the BOCC in May of 2000. The implementation of the plan is still
underway and was initiated, subsequent interagency approvals, late in 2000.
Monroe County initiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Florida Keys
Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) on May 14, 1998 and the FKAA Board agreed the following week.
This MOU established the FKAA as the wastewater development authority for all of
unincorporated Monroe County leaving Monroe County as the financiers.
In April of 2001 Monroe County prepared an analysis of implementing the Monroe County 2010
Comprehensive Plan. This analysis included a funding report for the goals and objectives as well
as those which were mandated by the State of Florida or the federal government. This report
found that the County's intent to limit the cost of wastewater implementation to approximately
4,500 dollars per equivalent dwelling unit combined with the nature of the state mandate
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 18
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
required that the state/federal governments would need to be an equal partner in funding the
infrastructure development at 50% of the total cost the other 50% being local share. The report
even indicated a 40% local share for onsite system development grants.
Monroe County and our wastewater partners, including the municipalities, districts, and state
agencies all continue to pursue every avenue for potential funding to complete central wastewater
infrastructure installation.
OBJECTIVE B:
Complete Storm Water Master Plan. Identify priority projects for implementation and
seek funding for plan implementation.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOT, SFWMD, EPA and WQSC.
County Response:
The Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan was completed in February of 2001.
Volume two (2) of the master plan includes the executive summary which includes the
identification of 22 retrofit and rehabilitation projects to address existing problem areas as well as
a recommended schedule of completion. The plan also identified that of these 22 recommended
projects only six (6) are within the jurisdiction of Monroe County. The following table indicates
the projects recommended and their status:
Table 6: Stormwater Management Master Plan Recommended
Projects
Project Name Status
Prado Circle on Big Coppitt Key
Card Sound Road (SR90SA)
Marathon Government Center
Burton Drive at USl in Tavernier
Jo-Jean Way in Tavernier
Veterans Park in Little Duck Key
Complete
In Design
Complete
In Design
Complete
Complete
OBJECTIVE C:
Make offers to 50% of remaining private owners with property located in CARL project
boundaries.
Agencies: County, Land Authority and DEP.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 19
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
Monroe County and/or state agencies completed purchase offers to over 50% of the private
property owners within the CARL project boundaries. This goal was achieved, as stated in the
previous year of the work program.
OBJECTIVE D:
Complete Phase II of the carrying capacity study (data analysis) and present initial
recommendations to review agencies.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, WQSC, SFRP,
EPA, USFWS, Army COE, and other interested parties to include representatives of
environmental organizations and development interests.
County Response:
Phase two (2) data and analysis for the FKCCS was completed through the initiation of ACOE
delivery orders three (3) through 12. The following table details the scope and approximate
completion date for phase two (2) data and analysis:
Table 7: FKCCS Phase 2 Data Collection and Delivery Order Completion Dates
Delivery Completion
Order Scope of Work Date
3
4
5
Project Strategy Development
Flexible Project Coordination
Design of a Conceptual Model
Assessment of Benthic Communities in the Florida
Keys
Mapping of Historical Habitats in the Florida Keys
Study of Water Issues in the Florida Keys
Socioeconomic Aspects of the Florida Keys
Evaluating Data Suitability for the FKCCS
Development and Refinement of the Test CCIAM
Completion of the CCIAM
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
May-DO
Sep-D2
Jan-Ol
Jul-D2
Jun-Ol
Oct-99
Oct-D2
Sep-D2
Jul-D2
Sep-D2
The initial study and model was presented to review agencies in early 2001 for comments and
review. Many comments were received in late 2001 and early 2002.
OBJECTIVE E:
Establish baseline water quality for surface and groundwater quality potentially impacted
by Little Venice project.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, FKAA, WQSC and EPA.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 20
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
The Little Venice project became a part of the City of Marathon's jurisdiction following
incorporation. However, the baseline water quality data was collected and established through
the DEP water quality monitoring program for this facility and collection system.
OBJECTIVE F:
Complete cesspit identification and continue cesspit replacement outside of Hot Spots,
with a priority of funds going, in order of preference, to low- and moderate income
households; ensure that a minimum of 88 cesspits are replaced
Agencies: County, FKAA, WQSC and DOH.
County Response:
Following the notification of cesspit owners by Monroe County and/or the Health Department
many owners applied for permits to demolish and replace those cesspits with approved compliant
systems. In an effort to assist low and very low income households with replacement the Monroe
County Housing Authority provided financial assistance with removal and replacement of 89
cesspits throughout Monroe County. As stated above, this programmatic success was completed
in the previous year of the work program.
Year Four Summary
Year four (4) of the work program consisted of objectives A through F. Monroe County is unable
to locate an annual assessment report for work progress in year four of the work program. Staff
contacted the Department office of Area of Critical State Concern Administration and was
informed that no report was submitted for year four (4) at the request of then Department
Secretary Steven Seibert due to the ongoing legal challenges to the work program and its
implementation. The information above is compiled from multiple sources including the ACOE
Jacksonville Office records for the FKCCS, historical data from Monroe County BOCC meetings
and the April 2001 report from the Growth Management Division titled Implementing the Monroe
County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan: A Study of the Fiscal Cost and Funding.
Table 8: Year Four Objective Completion
Percentage Percentage
Year Four Objective Complete (Work Complete
Year) (Comprehensive)
A 100% 100%
B 50% 65%
C 100% 100%
D 40% 100%
E 100% 100%
F 100% 100%
Year Four objective
Completion Avg. 82% 94%
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 21
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year four.
YEAR FIVE (July 13.2001 through Tuly 12.2002)
OBJECTIVE A:
Continue implementation of the Wastewater Master Plan pursuant to executed
interagency agreements. Begin construction of wastewater facilities in selected Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Department, DOH, DEP, EPA, and WQSC.
County Response:
Following the 2001-2002 State of Florida legislative session Monroe County passed through a
partial funding amount of one million dollars to the North Key largo Utility Corporation in Ocean
Reef. This allowed the utility to begin construction of the limited upgrade of the treatment
facility and the expansion of the collection system to 265 residences. The project was completed
in October of 2002.
Also in the 2001-2002 legislative sessions, the State of Florida established the Key largo
Wastewater treatment District as the wastewater authority for Hot Spot areas in Key Largo. The
District began immediately coordinating the transfer of responsibility from the FKAA and
initiated the process of acquiring contractors for the construction of infrastructure in two (2)
areas of their jurisdiction.
Monroe County began evaluating the potential facility and collection system for Conch key in
2001 by engaging the firm of CH2Mhill to prepare an evaluation report detailing the cost and time
line for construction. The evaluation report was completed in June of 2001 and rendered to the
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners for consideration.
OBJECTIVE B:
Execute interagency agreements to define construction schedule for selected storm water
improvement projects. Complete land acquisition and final design for selected treatment
strategies for Storm Water Master Plan.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOT, WQSC and SFWMD.
County Response:
Monroe County completed a Joint Participation Agreement (JP A) with FDOT in December of 2005. This
JP A established a partnership for review and implementation of improvement projects along the right of
way for US 1 requiring compliance with the Monroe County Stormwater Master Plan.
OBJECTIVE C:
Conclude negotIatIOns with all willing owners with property within CARL project
boundaries. Acquire a total-to-date of 45% of the Key Deer/Coupon Bight project and 25%
of the Florida Keys Ecosystems project from willing sellers.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 22
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
Monroe County and our partners, the State of Florida and the federal government, have acquired
83% of the private vacant land within the acquisition area of the expanded acquisition areas of
CARL/Florida Forever in the planning area of Big Pine and No Name Keys. Approximately 430
acres remain to be acquired in 1005 parcels.
Currently, the Keys wide Florida Forever acquisition boundary encompasses a total of 13,758
parcels which contain a total of 22,061 acres. Monroe County, the State of Florida and the US
Government all expend resources to retire development rights within this acquisition area and at
present a total of 2,277 parcels containing a total of 3,497 acres remain private vacant land with
the Florida Forever acquisition area or approximately % of the total acquisition area.
OBJECTIVE D:
Complete final draft of the carrying capacity study including acceptance by review
agencIes.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Department, DEP, DOH, DOT, FFWCC, SFWMD, WQSC,
SFRPC, EP A, USFWS, Army COE, and other interested parties to include
representatives of environmental organizations and development interests.
County Response:
The FKCCS final report was submitted to Monroe County in September of 2002. This study
remains the source of much consternation in the scientific community. Following peer review of
the document it became apparent that significant flaws existed within the model component. To
date these flaws have not been addressed and the model remains a product with little real life
application. However, this flawed model does not deflate the scientific body of work that stands
as the study. The FKCCS still stands as a guiding document for planning future development in
Monroe County and the Florida Keys.
OBJECTIVE E:
Continue eliminating cesspits and inoperative septic tanks in areas outside of Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, DOH, FKAA and WQSC.
County Response:
Monroe County notified all property owners utilizing cesspools for wastewater disposal in January
of 2000 that their property was not meeting required operation standards and shall be upgraded
to a permitted On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS). Monroe County also
notified 188 property owners with unknown systems communicating the same information in
early 2000. Following receipt of this notification many of these owners immediately responded
with either permit information or entered into contracts for replacement. Those owners not
responding within an acceptable timeframe and/or not pursuing replacement were subject to
code enforcement action. Monroe County estimated that approximately 12,000 unpermitted
OSTDS systems existed in 1997. However not all of these were cesspools.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 23
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
It was estimated that the process of cesspool elimination would take approximately 12 years to
complete. However, with a notification rate of approximately 2,000 per year and an implemented
enforcement tool, combined with a nutrient reduction credit program for new residential
development the program was completed for areas outside of Hot Spots in late 2002
approximately six (6) years after implementation. It is estimated that prior to July 2002
approximately 10,000 notifications had been mailed and the majority of those property owners
notified were in compliance.
Year Five Summary
Year five (5) of the work program consisted of objectives A through E. Monroe County is unable
to locate an annual assessment report for work progress in year five (5) of the work program. Staff
contacted the Department office of Area of Critical State Concern Administration and was
informed that no report was submitted for year five (5) at the request of then Department
Secretary Steven Seibert due to the ongoing legal challenges to the work program and its
implementation. The information above is compiled from multiple sources including the ACOE
Jacksonville Office records for the FKCCS, historical data from Monroe County BOCC meetings
and the April 2001 report from the Growth Management Division titled Implementing the Monroe
County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan: A Study of the Fiscal Cost and Funding.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year five (5).
Table 9: Year Five Objective Completion
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 24
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
YEAR SIX (July 13.2002 through Tuly 12.2003)
OBJECTIVE A:
Continue construction of wastewater facilities in Hot Spots begun in previous year.
Contract to design and construct additional wastewater treatment facilities in Hot Spots
in accordance with the schedule of the Wastewater Master Plan. Continue
implementation of Wastewater Master Plan with emphasis on Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, DOW, Department, EPA and WQSC.
County Response:
Monroe County began construction on increased capacity for facilities within two (2) Hot Spot
areas in year five (5) of the work program. The first of these is North Key largo which is serviced
by North Key Largo Utility in Ocean Reef. Planning and engineering for this project began in late
2001 with assistance from the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) and construction began in
May of 2002. This phase of the project included some upgrade of the facility and the expansion of
the service area to include 265 residences. The project was completed in October of 2002. The
project was partially funded by the State of Florida with a contribution of one (1) million dollars of
the total project cost of four (4) million dollars.
Monroe County entered into a contract for {.6 million dollars with Key West Resort Utilities in
2002 to provide wastewater service to the area of south Stock Island. This contract allowed
expansion of existing service and limited upgrade of the facility/collection system and was
completed in July of 2003. Key West Resort Utility urged the County to begin enforcement of
ordinance 04-2000 which, authorized by Florida Statutes, requires the owner of real property to
connect to provide public wastewater infrastructure within 30 days of provision. The County
agreed and an area of South Stock Island, through code enforcement action, was connected to the
existing infrastructure in early 2003.
Monroe County initiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Florida Keys
Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) on May 14, 1998 and the FKAA Board agreed the following week.
This MOU established the FKAA as the wastewater development authority for all of
unincorporated Monroe County leaving Monroe County as the financiers. This agreement was
superseded by State of Florida legislative action in 2002 establishing the Key Largo Wastewater
Treatment District (KLWTD) as the wastewater authority of record for the projects in the Hot
Spots of Key Largo. KL WTD wasted little time in signing contracts with two firms to begin
construction of projects in Key Largo Trailer Village and Key Largo Park, June of 2003.
Monroe County began the evaluation for the wastewater system to serve Conch Key in 2001. The
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners voted to pursue a standalone system for the area
of Conch Key rather than include the project area in an upgraded and expanded system at Hawks
Cay (Duck Key) and a site for the standalone system was acquired along USl in early 2003.
Construction of the standalone system was estimated to take approximately one and half years.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 25
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
The County also acquired two parcels along USl in Bay Point subdivision as the location for this
treatment plant. The County also expected to advertize bid documents in September or August of
2003 for the Bay Point treatment plant.
OBJECTIVE B:
Initiate construction of selected projects as identified in the Storm Water Master Plan.
Agencies: County, SFWMD, DEP, Department, DOT, EPA and WQSC.
County Response:
The completion of the Stormwater Management Master Plan in 2001 allowed Monroe County
begin the implementation through the immediate completion of four (4) of the six (6) priority
projects identified in the plan. Also, the County engaged the SFWMD to assist in the completion
of four (4) additional street stormwater collection improvements which encompassed 51 streets
throughout Monroe County with a total project cost of over 1.5 million dollars. In July of 2003 one
and a half of the four (4) projects (11 streets) were complete and over 800,000 dollars had been
spent.
OBJECTIVE C:
Implement the carrying capacity study by, among other things, the adoption of all
necessary plan amendments to establish a rate of growth and a set of development
standards that ensure that any and all new development does not exceed the capacity of
the county's environment and marine system to accommodate additional impacts. Plan
amendments will include a review of the County's Future Land Use Map series and
changes to the map series and the "as of right" and "maximum" densities authorized for
the plan's future land use categories based upon the natural character of the land and
natural resources that would be impacted by the currently authorized land uses, densities
and intensities.
Agencies: County, FKAA, FFWCC, Department, DEP, DOH, DOT, SFWMD,
SFRPC, EPA, Army COE, WQSC, and USFWS, and other interested parties to
include representatives of environmental organizations and development
interests.
County Response:
The FKCCS final report was submitted to Monroe County in September of 2002. This study
remains the source of much consternation in the scientific community. Following peer review of
the document it became apparent that significant flaws existed within the model component. To
date these flaws have not been addressed and the model remains a product with little real life
application. However, this flawed model does not deflate the scientific body of work that stands
as the study. The FKCCS still stands as a guiding document for planning future development in
Monroe County and the Florida Keys.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 26
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
With the Carrying Capacity Impact Assessment Model (CClAM) accuracy in question Monroe
County, nor its partners, could pursue implementation of growth controls and land use
regulations based on model scenarios. However, as stated above the value of the study cannot be
overestimated. The study, never intended to be a guiding document for development regulations,
did not include specific recommendations for plan amendments but it did conclude with four key
findings:
1. Prevent encroachment into native habitat. A wealth of evidence shows that terrestrial
habitats and species have been severely affected by development and further impacts
would only exacerbate an already untenable condition.
2. Continue and intensify existing programs. Many initiatives to improve environmental
conditions and quality of life exist in the Florida Keys. They include land acquisition
programs, the wastewater and stormwater master plans, ongoing research and
management activities in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, and restoration
efforts throughout the Keys.
]. If further development is to occur, focus on redevelopment and in fill. Opportunities for
additional growth with small, potentially acceptable, additional impacts may occur in
areas ripe for redevelopment or already disturbed.
4- Increase efforts to manage the resources. Habitat management efforts in the Keys could
increase to effectively preserve and improve the ecological values of remaining terrestrial
ecosystems.
Monroe County recognizing the validity of these findings adopted Goal 105 of the 2010
Comprehensive Plan in 2002. This goal provides the framework for implementation of the
findings of the FKCCS through the guiding of development based on community wide conditions
and impacts. In July of 2003 The Growth Management Division had began the process of
community wide condition assessment using the geographic information system to group like
conditions into three (3) tiers. Tier 1 inappropriate for continued development, tier 2 a transitional
area and tier 3, infill areas ripe for continued development.
The County also approved the Habitat Conservation Plan for the planning area of Big Pine Key
and No Name Key. This document would serve as an application for an Incidental take Permit
from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&W) to continue development in the
planning areas to increase impact on jeopardized species to 1.1 and mitigate that impact at a 3:1
ratio or 3.3 resulting in a 5% probability of quasi extinction of the umbrella species (key deer) in a
50 year period. This plan was a joint application from Monroe County and our partners the
Department and the Florida Department of Transportation.
Monroe County also created the Conservation and Natural Area Overlay District to prevent the
potential loss of valuable habitat areas during the complete implementation of the Tier System
and other key components ofFKCCS implementation.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 27
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE D:
Complete the elimination of all cesspits in areas outside of Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DOH and WQSC.
County Response:
This objective was completed in the previous year of the work program.
It was estimated that the process of cesspool elimination would take approximately 12 years to
complete. However, with a notification rate of approximately 2,000 per year and an implemented
enforcement tool, combined with a nutrient reduction credit program for new residential
development the program was completed for areas outside of Hot Spots in late 2002
approximately six (6) years after implementation. It is estimated that prior to July 2002
approximately 10,000 notifications had been mailed and the majority of those property owners
notified were in compliance.
OBJECTIVE E:
Develop a Keys-wide master land acquisition plan which shall include:
(1) a strategy for the acquisition of those properties which should be preserved
due their habitat value as well as those other properties where future
development is to be discouraged.
(2) a management plan for implementing the strategy, and
(3) a reasonable, feasible plan for securing funding for said land acquisition.
Agencies: County, Land Authority, Department, DEP, SFWMD, Army
CaE, EPA, USFWS, and other interested parties to include representatives
of environmental organizations and development interests.
County Response:
Monroe County completed the Land Acquisition and Management Master Plan in August of 2006.
This plan is a comprehensive approach to the acquisition needs of Monroe County and the
management of those properties acquired. The plan includes a detailed funding plan, identifying
both current and future funding sources. Included in the plan is an implementation strategy for
acquisition. The plan also discusses the land needs associated with affordable housing
development and identifies potential funding for the program.
OBJECTIVE F:
Initiate and complete a collaborative process for the adoption of land development
regulations, and/or comprehensive plan amendments as needed, that will strengthen the
protection of terrestrial habitat through processes such as the Permit Allocation System
and permitting processes, and the preservation and maintenance of affordable housing
stock.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 28
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, FFWC, USFWS, and other interested
parties to include representatives of environmental organizations and
development interests.
County Response:
A joint effort to identify the correct steps to implement the key findings of the FKCCS was
formally recognized in February of 2003 with the creation of the FKCCS/Rule 28-20
Implementation Work Group. However, the work of this group is largely encompassed in the
implementation of Goal 105 and the creation of the Tier System.
Year Six Summary
Year six (6) of the work program consisted of objectives A through F. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in June of 2000, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the
work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year six (6).
Table 10: Year Six Objective Completion
Percentage
. .. Percentage Complete
Year SIX Objective (W k Y) Complete
or ear .
(Comprehensive)
A 100% 100%
B 100% 100%
C 100% 100%
D 100% 100%
E 0% 100%
F 50% 100%
Year Six Objective
Completion Avg. 75% 100%
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 29
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
YEAR SEVEN (July 13. 2003 through Tuly 12. 2004)
OBJECTIVE A:
Finalize construction and begin operating wastewater facilities in Hot Spots. Continue
implementation of Wastewater Master Plan with continued emphasis on Hot Spots.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, Department, DOH, EPA and WQSC
County Response:
Monroe County continued to implement the findings of the Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater
Master Plan throughout year seven (7) of the work program. In the annual progress report
submitted to Department by the County it was represented that the facilities in Stock Island, Bay
Point, Conch Key, Key Largo and Ocean Reef were complete. The report also listed the status of
connections for each facility. The facility at Bay Point was complete with only % of EDU's
remaining to be connected. The report also indicated that 41% of the Stock Island project was
complete with over half of the EDU's connected. The project at Conch Key was 59% completed
with over half of the EDU's connected. Lastly, the project area of Key Largo Trailer Village and
Key Largo Park were 40% complete with 727 EDU's remaining to be connected.
Table 11: Year 7 Waste Water
Connection Status
Project Area Percent Connected
Stock Island
Bay Point
Conch Key
Key Largo*
Ocean Reef
41%
76%
59%
40%
100%
The progress included in this table is taken from exhibit 1 of the Year Seven (7) Annual Progress
Report and the connection numbers represented for the Key Largo project are for a subset of the
project area only.
OBJECTIVE B:
Continue implementing selected projects as identified in the Storm Water Master Plan.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOT, SFWMD, EPA and WQSC
Prior to July 12, 2004 Monroe County completed retrofit projects at four (4) of four projects and
had spent approximately 1 million dollars to implement stormwater management best
management practices along 51 streets.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 30
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Year Seven Summary
Year seven (7) of the work program consisted of objectives A and B. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in June of 2000, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the
work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year seven (7).
Table 12: Year Seven Objective Completion
Percentage
Year Seven Percentage Complete C I
Ob' . (W k Y ) omp ete
Jectlve or ear (C h.)
ompre enslve
A 100% 100%
B 100% 100%
Year Seven
Objective
Completion Avg. 100% 100%
YEAR EIGHT (July 13. 2004 through Tuly 12.2005)
OBJECTIVE A:
Review and revise (as necessary) the Conservation and Natural Areas Map.
Agencies: County, USFWS, FWCC, DEP, Department
County Response:
The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners adopted ordinance 018-2004 which
established an interim development ordinance for all properties falling with the boundary of the
Conservation and Natural Area (CNA). This followed the creation for the CNA map product that
was the product of three (3) public hearings and ample staff review. Additional corrections to
these maps were identified during special master proceedings. However, the moratorium and
CNA product relevance passed prior to any corrections being made.
OBJECTIVE B:
Initiate acquisition strategy for lands identified outside the Conservation and Natural
Areas identified as worthy of protection.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 31
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
Monroe County adopted comprehensive plan amendments in early 2005 which established the
development regulation strategy for the Tier System. This amendment establishes significant
development hurdles to be overcome for properties considered to be valuable habitat outside of
the CNA area effectively discouraging development of these parcels.
OBJECTIVE C:
Begin public hearings for Conservation and Natural Areas boundaries.
Agencies: County
County Response:
As stated above the public hearings and adoption of the CNA area occurred on June 16, 2004 with
two (2) public hearings occurring prior to this date.
OBJECTIVE D:
Conclude public hearings for the adoption of the amended Conservation and Natural
Areas Boundaries.
Agencies: County
County Response:
As stated above the public hearings and adoption of the CNA area occurred on June 16, 2004 with
two (2) public hearings occurring prior to this date.
OBJECTIVE E:
Adopt an ordinance to implement a moratorium on ROGO/NROGO applications that
involves the clearing of any portion of an upland tropical hardwood hammock or
pinelands habitat contained in a tropical hardwood hammock or pinelands patch of two
or more acres in size located within a Conservation and Natural Area.
Agencies: County, Department
County Response:
The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners adopted ordinance 018-2004 on June 16,
2004 which established an interim development ordinance for all properties falling with the
boundary of the Conservation and Natural Area (CNA).
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 32
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE F:
Adopt amendments to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations to enact
overlay designations, and eliminate or revise the Habitat Evaluation Index, and modify the
ROGO/NROGO system to guide development away from environmentally sensitive lands.
Agencies: County, Department
County Response:
In an effort to implement Goal 105 Monroe County adopted comprehensive plan amendments in
early 2005 which established the development regulation strategy for the Tier System. The Tier
System is a simplistic method of providing property evaluation and development potential for the
use of determining development impact on surrounding habitat and infrastructure. This
simplistic approach eliminates the cumbersome Habitat Evaluation Index system utilized to
determine upland habitat quality and modifies ROGO and NROGO to base building permit
competition upon the properties' Tier placement.
OBJECTIVE G:
Amend land development regulations to prohibit the designation of Conservation and
Natural Areas (Tier 1) as a receiver site for ROGO exempt development from sender sites;
and to further limit clearing of upland native habitat that may occur in the Natural Areas
(Tier 1) and the Transition and Sprawl Reduction Area (Tier II) upon designation by the
County.
Agencies: County, Department
County Response:
Monroe County adopted land development regulations to implement the comprehensive plan
amendments that created the Tier System in compliance with and implementing Goal 105 in
March of 2006. These Land Development Regulations limited allowed clearing of upland native
habitat in all Tiers and captured new growth areas for protection.
OBJECTIVE H:
Develop Land Acquisition and Management Master Plan and address both funding and
management strategies.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, USFWS, FWCC
County Response:
Monroe County completed and transmitted the Land Acquisition and Management Plan to the
Department in August of 2006. This plan relies on a combination of grant funding, tax revenue
and mitigation from upland native vegetation removal for funding of both acquisition and
maintenance of parcels.
OBJECTIVE I:
Provide $40 million in financing secured by infrastructure tax for wastewater facilities.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 33
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
Monroe County provided 20 million dollars in 2005, 3.8 million in 2006, and 10 million in 2007 to
the Key Largo Waste Water Treatment District from infrastructure tax dollars for a total
allotment of 33.8 million dollars from that tax fund.
OBJECTIVE J:
Begin construction of wastewater plants or laying of collection lines for Baypoint, Conch
Key and Key Largo Trailer Village/Key Largo Park.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP, Key Largo Wastewater District
County Response:
The Monroe County year eight annual progress report indicated that the Baypoint facility was
complete with 76% of the area connected. The report also indicated that the Hawks Cay
Wastewater Treatment Plant was purchased by the FKAA and 60% of Conch Key is connected.
Lastly the report detailed that the project area of Key Largo Park and Trailer Village in Key Largo
is 40% connected to the completed Key Largo Treatment Plant.
OBJECTIVE K:
Ensure the connection for up to 1,350 ED Us at Stock Island to Key West Resort Utilities.
Agencies: County, DEP
County Response:
As of August 2006495 EDU's had been connected to the treatment plant operated by Key West
Resort Utilities and the plant was in design phase for the A WT upgrade for the facility. Currently
approximately 82% of the 2,672 EDUs served by the initial gravity collection system and Phases 1-3
of the expanded vacuum system are connected.
OBJECTIVE L:
Complete lower Keys and Key Largo Feasibility Study.
Agencies: County, FKAA, DEP
County Response:
These feasibility studies have been completed and are in implementation phase with properties
under construction at Rockland Key and Key Largo and the Cudjoe facility is in design phase
which will serve from Lower Sugarloaf to No Name Key.
OBJECTIVE M:
Complete projects identified in the Stormwater Management Master Plan.
Agencies: County, DEP, Department
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 34
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
Monroe County has implemented design review for all projects submitted for development
approval to ensure that stormwater management is an element of design and is compliant with
the 95% retention regulations adopted by Monroe County in an effort to implement the
Stormwater Management Plan. Also, FDOT has completed many of the suggested stormwater
management projects recommended by the plan for USl improvement. Please refer to table 6 for
a complete update on required project completion.
OBJECTIVE N:
Evaluate and implement strategies to ensure that affordable housing remains affordable in
perpetuity for future generations. Establish a partnership with non-profit organizations in
order to construct affordable housing using additional state funds.
Agencies: County, FHFC, Department
County Response:
Monroe County enjoys a partnership with many of the affordable housing non-profit and for
profit groups including the Middle Keys and Lower Keys land Trusts, habitat for humanity and
HSA property development. The County has also employed an Affordable Housing Coordinator
to facilitate housing development and plan amendment to maintain affordability. Ensuring
affordability in perpetuity has been accomplished through the modification of Land Development
Regulations to require a 99 year ground lease with Monroe County which is renewable.
OBJECTIVE 0:
Identify potential acquisition sites for affordable housing proposals and include in the
Land Acquisition Master Plan.
Agencies: County, FHFC, Department
County Response:
Monroe County reserved ROGO allocations for the use of affordable housing development on
four parcels totaling 69 units. The County recently selected vendors to construct these units and
completion is expected in 2009 for the majority of these units. Two (2) of these four parcels were
identified as a part of the Land Acquisition and Management Plan.
OBJECTIVE P:
Provide up to $10 million in bond financing from the Tourist Impact Tax for acquisition of
land for workforce housing and affordable housing sites.
Agencies: County
County Response:
Monroe County abandoned the plan to fund Land Authority acquisitions for affordable housing
development through bonding capacity on the advice of bond counsel and the great unlikely hood
of a statutory amendment allowing bonds to be issued at the state level. The current approach
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 35
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
continues to fund acquisition and development as the Land Authority spent 7.5 million toward
this end during 2004-2006.
OBJECTIVE Q:
Complete a comprehensive analysis of hurricane evacuation issues in the Florida Keys and
develop strategies to reduce actual hurricane clearance times and thereby reduce potential
loss oflife from hurricanes.
Agencies: County, Department
County Response:
Monroe County participated in the Department organized Florida Keys Hurricane Evacuation
Working Group to prepare and adopt Comprehensive Plan Policy 216.1.8 on September 22, 2005.
This policy stipulates the phased evacuation method utilized when an evacuation is called by the
Mayor of Monroe County during an emergency. The clearance time benefit of this process is still
being documented through the firm of Greenburg and Trauig in Tallahassee, Florida.
Year Eight Summary
Year eight (8) of the work program consisted of objectives A and Q and is the most intensive
schedule of work during the 10 year work program. Monroe County's progress report, submitted
in June of 2000, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year eight (8).
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 36
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Table 12: Year Eight Objective Completion
Percentage Percentage
Year Eight Objective Complete (Work Complete
Year) (Comprehensive)
A 100% 100%
B 100% 100%
C 100% 100%
D 100% 100%
E 100% 100%
F 50% 100%
G 0% 100%
H 50% 100%
I 50% 100%
J 100% 100%
K 36% 100%
L 100% 100%
M 65% 65%
N 100% 100%
0 100% 100%
P 0% 0%
Q 100% 100%
Year Eight Objective
Completion Avg. 74% 92%
YEAR NINE (July 13. 2005 through Tuly 12. 2006)
OBJECTIVE A:
In coordination with the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority and the Key Largo Sewer
District, initiate the process to obtain $80 million in bond financing secured by
connection fees.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
The Key Largo Waste Water Treatment District is using connection fees to secure State Revolving
Fund Bonds in the amount of75 million dollars through the FDEP. Monroe County has allocated
20 million dollars from the infrastructure sales tax and continues to secure the maximum lending
amount available to the unincorporated areas through SRF loans as well to fund wastewater
infrastructure development throughout Monroe County.
OBJECTIVE B:
Secure site for lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater facility
Agencies: County, FKAA
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 37
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
County Response:
The Key Largo Waste Water Treatment District has secured the location of the regional treatment
plant for the Key Largo area at approximately mile marker 100.3 and a portion of the plant has
been constructed and is operational. The plant must be expanded to accommodate the additional
volume generated through the service of all of the island of Key Largo.
Stock Island is serviced by Key West Resort Utility and the plant is operational and serving
residents. The Rockland Key site has been purchased and construction is underway to service the
extreme lower keys. The Cudjoe Key Landfill is the proposed location of the regional plant to
service from lower Sugarloaf Key to No Name Key and the property is already in County
ownership.
Year Nine Summary
Year nine (9) of the work program consisted of objectives A and B. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in August of 2006, concluded that substantial progress had been made during
the work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year nine (9).
Table 14: Year Nine Objective Completion
Percentage
. .. Percentage Complete
Year Nme Objective (W k Y) Complete
or ear .
(Comprehensive)
A 93% 100%
B 100% 100%
Year Nine Objective
Completion Avg. 97% 100%
YEAR TEN (July 13.2006 through July 12.2007)
OBJECTIVE A:
Award contract for design, construction and operation for the lower Keys and Key Largo
wastewater facilities.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
The Lower Keys wastewater plan includes two regional plants and the Stock Island plant. The
Lower Keys Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant located at Big Coppitt is under construction
and completion is expected in 2009. The forcemain construction for this facility is complete as
are the designs for the collection systems for Rockland and Geiger Key. Construction for the Big
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 38
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Coppitt collection system IS 40% complete and the Shark Key collection system IS 95%
constructed.
The North lower Keys Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant is in design phase with a recent
inter- local agreement amendment to expand the service area to include lower Sugarloaf and Big
Pine Key. Facility design is 25% complete.
OBJECTIVE B:
Begin construction of the lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater plants.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
The Rockland facility IS underway and completion is expected in 2009. Monroe County
authorized the FKAA to proceed with landfill closure activities at the proposed site for the North
Lower Keys facility in anticipation of plant construction. As stated above the plant design is at
25%.
OBJECTIVE C:
Initiate connections to lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater systems.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
Monroe County has connected 87% of the connections at the Baypoint facility and those not
connected are in a code enforcement process requiring connection. The same is true for Stock
Island residents where the service is available and those not connected are under code
enforcement violation. Pre-payment of connection fee for the Big Coppitt facility began in August
of 2007.
OBJECTIVE D:
Complete construction and hookups for Baypoint, Conch Key and Key Largo Trailer
Village/Key Largo Park.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
As stated above construction and connections at the Bay Point facility are complete. Remaining
properties not connected are in violation proceedings requiring connection. The same is true for
the Conch Key facility, although this plant has not yet been upgraded to A WT standards.
Connections to the Key Largo facility are completed for the Key Largo Trailer Village and Key
Largo Park.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 39
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE E:
Obtain $80 million in bond financing secured by connection fees.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
Monroe County began assessing the connection fee pre-payment totaling approximately 9.5
million dollars in August of 2007 for the areas of Big Coppitt and Duck Key. The County has also
secured an SRF loan in the amount of 21 million dollars for Big Coppitt although only a portion of
this amount was secured through connection fee revenues and the remaining was secured
through sales tax revenue. Approximately 28 million dollars in connection fees for the lower
Sugarloaf through Big Pine Key service area remain to be collected.
Year Ten Summary
Year 10 of the work program consisted of objectives A through E. Monroe County's progress
report, submitted in June of 2007, concluded that substantial progress had been made during the
work year.
At the conclusion of the Ten Year Work Program Monroe County has satisfied all of the objectives
from year 10.
Table 15: Year Ten Objective Completion
Percentage
.. Percentage Complete
Year Ten Objective (W k Y) Complete
or ear .
(Comprehensive)
A 75% 75%
B 65% 85%
C 75% 75%
D 100% 100%
E 93% 93%
Year Ten Objective
Completion Avg. 82% 86%
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 40
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Comprehensive Work Program Analysis Summary
Monroe County concludes that substantial progress has been made toward the implementation of
the 10 Year Work Program as outlined in the Florida Statutes and the Monroe County 2010
Comprehensive Plan. The Work Program includes specific objectives that Monroe County is
directed to complete. These objectives are not general but specific. Monroe County contends
that the term "continue construction" or "continue implementation" as used in the Work Program
cannot be construed to mean complete. The following table represents a summary of the
percentage complete data contained above for each year of the Work Program as it relates to each
specific objective:
Table 16: Comprehensive Work Program Progress
W k Y Percentage Complete Percentage Complete
or ear .
(Work Year) (Comprehensive)
1 1996-97 59% 100%
2 1997-98 52% 100%
3 1999-00 100% 100%
4 2000-01 82% 94%
52001-02 84% 100%
6 2002-03 75% 100%
7 2003-04 100% 100%
8 2004-05 74% 92%
9 2005-06 97% 100%
10 2006-07 84% 84%
Average 81% 97%
The above table indicates that Work Program objectives remain incomplete at the conclusion of
the Work Program. Years four (4), eight (8) and ten (10) contain the following outstanding
objectives:
YEAR FOUR (July 13, 2000 through July 12, 2001)
OBJECTIVE B:
Complete Storm Water Master Plan. Identify priority projects for implementation and
seek funding for plan implementation.
Agencies: County, Department, DEP, DOT, SFWMD, EPA and WQSC.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 41
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
YEAR EIGHT (July 13, 2004 through July 12, 2005)
OBJECTIVE M:
Complete projects identified in the Stormwater Management Master Plan.
Agencies: County, DEP, Department
County Response:
Both of the above objectives require the completion of projects identified in the Monroe County
Stormwater Master Plan. The following table details those projects which remain outstanding
and their status:
Project Name Status
Table 6: Stormwater Management Master Plan Recommended
Projects
Prado Circle on Big Coppitt Key
Card Sound Road (SR905A)
Marathon Government Center
Burton Drive at US1 in Tavernier
Jo-Jean Way in Tavernier
Veterans Park in Little Duck Key
Complete
In Design
Complete
In Design
Complete
Complete
Monroe County expects completion of both the Card Sound project and the Burton Drive project
within the year.
YEAR TEN (July 13,2006 through July 12,2007)
OBJECTIVE A:
Award contract for design, construction and operation for the lower Keys and Key Largo
wastewater facilities.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
OBJECTIVE B:
Begin construction of the lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater plants.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
OBJECTIVE C:
Initiate connections to lower Keys and Key Largo wastewater systems.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 42
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
OBJECTIVE E:
Obtain $80 million in bond financing secured by connection fees.
Agencies: County, FKAA, Key Largo Sewer District
County Response:
All of the Year 10 objectives which remain outstanding are related to implementation of the
Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan. The County has made substantial effort in
recent years and particularly in recent months to secure funding for the implementation and
completion of the wastewater project, not just in unincorporated Monroe County but in the
Florida Keys. The Regional Wastewater Partnership which includes Monroe County, the Florida
Keys Aqueduct Authority, the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment District, the City of Key West,
Bahia Honda State Park, the City of Marathon, the City of Key Colony Beach, the City of Layton,
the Village of Islamorada, and the North Key Largo Utility Corporation remain committed to
meeting the intent of the statutory mandate to provide A WT IBA T to the citizenry of Monroe
County.
Monroe County has not completed the implementation of the Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan,
the Monroe County Stormwater Management Plan, nor the acquisition of all lands identified for
acquisition in the Land Management and Acquisition Master Plan. The County does have
substantial investments in the completion of these plans and continues to strive toward
implementation and completion with the State of Florida as our partner. However, the direct
language of State Statute makes it very difficult to determine substantial progress has not been
made in the implementation of the 10 Year Work Program.
Should the Department and/or the Administration Commission feel that these plans should be
fully implemented prior to designation removal; the County feels that a statutory revision would
be required to implement a new measure of success along with a new set of objectives requiring
completion to satisfy the conditions of designation removal.
Monroe County remains committed to the partnership that exists with the State of Florida and is
proud of the progress our community has achieved. We view this potential removal of
designation as a crossroads in planning of our community's future and look forward to the
challenge of jointly crafting the next step.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 43
May 27, 2008
Conclusion
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
The uncertainty associated with measuring success with an undefined term such as 'substantial
progress' causes both Monroe County and the Department to often be in disagreement as to the
amount of progress made in a particular year being labeled as 'substantial'. The following table
details the results of the annual review for each year of the Work Program:
Table 17: Comprehensive Review of Yearly Substantial Progress Findings
Work Program Year
Year 1(1996-1997)
Year 2 (1997-1998)
Year 3 (1999-2000)
Year 4 (2000-2001)
Year 5 (2001-2002)
Year 6 (2002-2003)
Year 7 (2003-2004)
Year 8 (2004-2005)
Year 9 (2005-2006)
Year 10 (2006-2007)
Substantial Progress Findings
M C Department of Community Ad .. . C ..
onroe ounty Aff . ministration ommlsslon
airs
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
No Finding
No Finding
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Not Made
Substantial Progress Made
No Finding
No Finding
No Finding
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Not Made
No Finding
Substantial Progress Not Made
Substantial Progress Made
No Finding
No Finding
No Finding
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
Substantial Progress Made
No Finding
The above table indicates that for the ten (10) year period of the Work Program the Department
found that the County had not made substantial progress only twice or 20%. The same is true of
the findings from the Administration Commission. This can be interpreted as meaning that
Monroe County had made substantial progress on the objectives of the Work Program within the
required Work Program Year for eight of ten years. However, as some years no report was
produced nor findings made by Monroe County, the Department or the Administration
Commission, it is difficult to extract a success rate from this table alone.
Monroe County is extremely proud of the substantial progress made on Work Program issues
with the last ten (10) years. The County strives, along with its partners, to understand the impacts
of our decisions on our fragile environment and quality of life by engaging the finest scientific
minds in Florida to provide data and analysis. This desire for understanding has provided the
impetus for Monroe County to pursue issues like carrying capacity, unprecedented growth
control, and evacuation constraints in an effort to provide for sound decision making. Monroe
County, armed with these tools, is now in a position to soundly invest in its future setting a new
stage for smart growth and conservation planning within the next ten (10) years.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 44
May 27, 2008
[MONROE COUNTY AREA OF CRITICAL STATE
CONCERN DE-DESIGNATION REPORT]
Attachments
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 45
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Tiffany Stankiewicz, Sf. Planning Technician
Date: June 10, 2008
RE:
The intention of this memo is to clarify the market rate and affordable housing allocations
issued through RaGa beginning in Year 1 through Year 15; the market rate and
affordable housing allocations issued through RaGa Year 16; the number of RaGa
applicants in the queue for Quarter 3 Year 16 and the number of allocations available for
Quarter 3.
Attachment 1: RaGa Allocation Summary Years 1-15 which is a summary report of
approved allocations, permits issued, certificate of occupancy issued, and a column for
allocations/permits which is titled other detailing permits which are expired, tolled due to
the FEMA injunction, or are in construction by island and subsequently by subarea.
Attachment 1: RaGa Allocation Summary Year 16 Quarters 1 & 2 which is a summary
report of approved allocations, permits issued, certificate of occupancy issued, and a
column for allocations/permits which are expired, on hold, or have valid inspections by
island.
Attachment 1: RaGa Applicants for Quarter 3 Year 16 and the number of allocations
available for Quarter 3.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
0()
o
o
N
N
.~
<I:
....
Q)
.r::
0
0
U
"'C
Q)
:J
III
..!!!
"'C
Q)
"'C :J
Q) III
:J ..!!!
III
..!!! 2
III '~
">>
() Q)
c 0-
'"
0-
:J "'C
()
() Q)
0 >
Cl 0
'0 c a.
III Q) t:' 'iij a. It)
(;j :J <1:.....
c 0 0
0 () 0 III
~ "" N J: c .8
() 'E ~ Q) 0 .....
,g Q) :J :0 ~ .... cO
() -, '" '" 0
<I: - .s "E () Q) ~
"'C .2 >-
ClQ) .E "
.~ :J N <( Vl
III III (J) :;: :~
:J ..!!! (J) iii
0 2 '0 ~
:r: ~
Q) "E :J I- 0
2- u
:n Q; Vl
'" 0- L{) .... '"
"'C Q) 5:
0 vi .s .r:: '"
~ c 0 Q)
0 ro
Q) ~ ~ ~
(;j () '" Q c
0:: ..Q Q) Q)
ID <( >- u ~
~ "'C 0 "'C "
Q) CJ Q) Q)
'" > 0 :J >
2 0 III 0
"-
0.0:: ..!!! "-
0- '"
<I: "'C Vl
'0 Q) '"
:J 5:
t:: III c
1i5 0
0 ..!!! ~
0- ~
Q) 2 "
.Q
0:: '~ >- ro -6
~ Q) ~ ~
oc .<i
'" Q) g> x
E 0- Vl- Q)
E ~ '" '" gf
"'C "- Q)
:J " Q; ro 0
(/) Q) x -'" tj
> Q) "
0 Q) ro Q) Q)
a. OJ E 1il "-
" ~ (; .~
Q) a. It) ii E "- 11
(;j <1:..... (;
III ~ .8 .~ ro
0:: .8 :;; >
c Q) E ,,-
ID 0 ..... "- OJ :g
~ ~ " '" ,g
~ .... }i "-
'" c
'" () Q) '0 ~ Q; gl 0
2 .2 >- -'" 0 .l!l
"' "" :;; ro ~
<( " "- E " E
~ 0 .Q Q;
Vl iii Vl ~ ~
'" ro "-
ro '0 Q) c E " Vl
Q) ro Q)
>- I- Q) '0 ~ -g
>- ~ ~ "" Q) ~
ro Q) g ~
E (; -"
~ '" " ~
"- '" 0
~ Q) Q) "
(j) Vl ro ro gl !5
c
0 E ~ ~ ~ "
~ Q)
.E .!il '"
" .!il 0 -"
.Q Vl Vl Vl " ~
<( Ui >- >- >- t
Q) Q) Q) Q) 0
0 g oc oc oc "-
(? ~ Q) Q; ~ 0
'0 "
0 0 " "- Vl ~
~ 0 0 ~ "- :c
LL ...J ::J f- f-
~
c
Q)
E
""
"
'"
"
<(
-0
Q)
:::l
(/)
(/).!!!.
c (/)
o "
iii ()'
U c
oro~
= 0.. f'-.
<(:::lo
ClUO
CUC'\I
'Vi~~
~o~
I20
ro....
.!!!UC'\I
..ci.i=0)
ro'Em
-oQ)~
00 >-
lI= -::i
<(-0....,
Q) ~
2:JLO
ro(/)~
o::::.!!!.o
....(/)....
~:t=~
..... E (/)
ro ..... .....
"" Q) ro
""'(LQ)
.. ->-
.!!!.~O
~ ,2 (9
1-100
~go::::
ro=
E<(
E-o
:::l Q)
(/) 6
0..
0..
<(
co
(f)
ro
Qj
>-
>-
ro
E
E
:J
(fJ
c
Q
ro
()
.Q
<(
o
(')
o
[t:
c
Qj
E
.c
()
2
4'
C'\I f'-. f'-. co OJ m L[)
f'-. "<t 0 C'\I C') 0 C'\I L[) OJ
. C'\I C'\I L[) co
C') 0 f'-. 0 L[) "<t ~
L[) C') C'\I ~ m C'\I ~ C') "<t
m C'\I f'-. m C'\I ~ C') C'\I
C'\I
o
U
"C
Q)
:::l
11)
..!!!
"C
Q)
:::l
11)
11)
11)
-
'E
...
Q)
a.
OJC'\IC')C')
f'-.comC')
~C'\IOJ~
C'\IC'\ImC')
~C'\IC'\I~
"C
Q)
>
e
c..
c..
<(
11)
c
o
:;:;
ltl
U
.Q
<i:
(ij
-
o
I-
L[)f'-."<tco
C'\If'-.C')C')
C'\IC'\Im~
C')C'\IL[)O
~C'\IC')~
Q)
:c
ro
-0
0
Cl lI=
c <(
'Vi -0
:::l C (/)
0 ro ro
Q) (/) Ui (/) I Ui Ui (/) Q) -0
10 >- >- >- >- >- >- 10
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) I-
0:::: ::.::: ::.::: ::.::: :c ::.::: ::.::: ::.::: 0:::: Cl
Q) Q) ro Q) Q) c
Qj Qj -0 Qj Qj 'Vi
.:.t. '6 0 '6 .:.t.
Co 5 -0 0.. 5 -0 0.. Co :::l
0 0.. lI= 0 0.. 0
:2: ....J :2: :J <( ....J :2: :J :2: I
(')
"-
ill
-'"
ro
E
E
E
.8 (')
Qj Qj "-
Ol Ol ill
u u
E E -'"
ro
~ ~ E
E E E
"- "- E
0 0 0
.c .c .c
:J to to
0 0 0
(f) c c
co
o
OJ
C'\I
co
C'\I
m
C'\I
<i
~
>-
Qj
~
Ol
c
is (")
:J "-
o ill
x -'"
Qj ro
~ E
u .Q!
EE
~ E
::;; Qj
"- Ol
Q) -0 ~
:5 E CD
'0 ~ ~
..c 2: Co
:J "- E
~ Q) ~
'" oS E
II! c
'" ~
Qj 5:
:5 ill
~~
~ ~
(f) Qj
E :5
~ .~
>- Qj
~ ~
ill ~
5: :Q
.3 ::;;
OJ
o
o
C'\I
C'\I
0..
<(
c
Q
-0
is
.<!!
:s
>-
C
:J
o
o
(f)
'"
5:
'"
Qj
ro
Qj
oS
c
Qj
.c
5:
u
Qj
(;
"-
CL
'"
(f)
'"
5:
c
o
~
()
.Q
ro
Qj
oS
u
II!
.(i
x
(f)- Qj
'" (f)
Qj c
ro 0
-0 15
Qj Qj
ro ~
o .~
CL
o
()
.~
o
oS
o
c
'"
Qj
ro
Qj
oS
:Q
ro
>
E U
.g ~
c
o
2
E
ill
CL
(f)
Qj
U
:J
(j
.~
(f)
c
o
~
()
.Q
ro
U
Qj
C
Qj
E
g -ill
~ ~
c
~ ~
.~ 8 ~
~"6 ~
~ (L 0
II! ()
Qj
.c
f-
ill
CL (f)
0...1:
::J f-
(f)
C (f)
o C
:.;:::::; 0
CO:.;:::::;
() '"
gg0j'
-;''0:::
C -0 Qj
.~ ~ ~
~ 8:Q.
~<(<D
-"~~
'" 0 ~
~6~
>t= <l >-
~&8
10 ~o
cr"'cr
]1 ~
~ :J
~UJ
-
"'" ....
:;:~
_N
"'" ....
:;:~
<f
:l<""
:;: :;;
i=
-""
"'" ....
:;:~
-0 CD
"'Qj~
C > ....
'Vi e ~
::J a. >-
~~N
Qj III ell
::cs:::-
.g~l!!
.... " Qj
~g;
<C~5
<D
rn
w
>-
~
rn
E
5
(f)
c
o
~
rn
u
o
'"
o
'"
o
'"
-0 CD
Qj~
> ....
o "
Qj .... Qj
_ 0.>-
~~N
~VI~
""'c~
; ~ l!!
:;: " Qj
ut::
o "
= ::J
<Co
]!
Qj~
0:: ....
.Qj
Ei=
-0
<C
]!
QjN
0:: ....
.Qj
Ei=
-0
<C
Qj
=<C
Qj ,
0::""
E .~
-01-
<C
]!
Qj""
0:: ....
.Qj
Ei=
-0
<C
-
"'" ....
:;:~
_N
"'" ....
:;: ,!!!
I-
<C
:!;;;:M
:;: :;;
i=
-""
"'" ....
:;: ,!!!
I-
~
QI .!!!
~~
:!li: E
:;:-0
<C
ro
D
D
N
N-
.~
<C
<ri
rn
w
>-
o
'"
o
'"
1i
~
~
w
"
~
c .
'6 M
o ....
~ ~
w rn
~ ~
w E
~ 0
.... 1:,
w ~
..c :t
o w
..c ~
6 ....
w w
~ ~
w w
~ ~
"5 1:
~ rn
w w
j ~
.E w
~ ~
" "
w
~ :g
~ ~
~
w
o
w
w
w
~
~
rn
~
w
~
~
u
~
()
()
o
"'
w
~
~
~
~
w
I
c
o
rn
u
o
"
~
~
r ~
w '"'
~ '"'
rn
E ~
w -g
~ ~
~ s
o 0
c u
rn ~
w c
rn .~
~ I
w w
:c
w rn
~"E
" ,g
w -<
~ w
~~
:J f-
APPLICANTS UNDER REVIEW
FOR QUARTER 3 YEAR 16
(JANUARY 15, 2008-APRIL 14, 2008)
Attachment 1: Summary ROGO applicants for Quarter 3 Year 16
Market Rate Affordable Housing
Rollover from New Applicants Q Rollover from Q 2 Y New Applicants
Sub-area Q2Y16 3Y16 16 Q3Y16
Lower 181 9 0 0
Big Pine/No Name 46 2 0 2
Upper 383 7 0 2
Upper Adm. Relief 10 0 0 0
Total 620 18 0 4
Total Market: 638 Total Affordable: 4
Market Rate
At the end of Quarter 2 Year 16 the following allocations remain available for issuance
thru July 2008.
.l . ....... ...
Lower/Upper 95 75 20
Big Pine/No Name 8 6 2
Total remaining Y 16 103 81 22
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Tiffany Stankiewicz, Sf. Planning Technician
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Administrative Relief Summary Years 1 - 16 Quarter 2
The intention of this memo is to clarifY the number of Administrative Relief approved by
the Planning Commission for allocation awards and the number of pending
Administrative Relief applications pending to be reviewed and the number of potential
administrative relief applications.
Attachment 3 Summary Report of Administrative Relief
Attachment 3 Estimate of Administrative Relief Applicants
Attachment 3 Submitted Administrative Relief Applications by area.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
'+-
Q)
"-
Q)
0::
Q)
>
:;::;
co
s.....
+""
en
"-
c
"E
"'C
<(
'+-
o
t
o
0..
Q)
0::
~
CO
E
E
::J
CJ)
>-
Iii
E
E
:J
CI)
....
'Qj
Qj N
0::: Qj
Qj t
:5 ~
~ a
Ui <0
'c
'E 2
~ :5
~ ~
c m
Qj >-
E 0
15 <..?
2 0
~ 0:::
00
o
o
N
(")
.C
C.
<:(
Estimate of Applicants
Potentially Eligible for Administrative Relief
After the close of the 16th Quarter
Attachment 3: Administrative Releif
Summary Potential Applicants
Quarter 16 Endin Bi Pine/No Name Lower U er
April 2008 0 5 30
July 2008 1 7 30
Oct 2008 0 6 19
Jan 2009 0 7 23
April 2009 1 4 18
July 2009 2 20 19
Oct 2009 5 13 25
Jan 2010 2 18 31
April 2010 3 14 19
Oct 2010 5 26 26
Jan 2011 3 15 14
April 2011 1 13 14
July 2011 5 11 9
Oct 2011 3 9 6
Jan 2012 1 1 4
April 2012 0 3 0
Adm Relief applied
Allachmenl3: Administrative ReleifSummary
ROGO Years 11hru 16 Quarter 2
NAME2
SUBJECT SUBJECT SUBJECT REAL ADM RELIEF ADM RELIEF ADM RELIEF
SUB-AREA PERMIT LOT BLOCK SUBJECT SUBDIVISION SUBJECT KEY ESTATE NO PC_APPR PCDATE ALLOe APPR RESO soce DATE
Ashby upper 99-03-3547 4 12 Pamela Villa Largo 466170 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 198-2004 5/19/2005
Stringer upper 99-03-3366 145 Port Largo 1 st Edition Largo 452760 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 199-2004 6/9/2004
Equizabal upper 00-03-3720 7 4 Tavernier Ocean Shores Largo 483140 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 318-2004 8/18/2004
Lang upper 00-03-3041 6 10 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 00544410.000000 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 200-2004 5/19/2004
Booth upper 00-03-2196 8 8 Largo Sound Village Largo 475480 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 320-2004 8/18/2004
Coradeghini upper 00-03-0252 1 2 Harris Ocean Park Estates Largo 447150 TRUE 4/27/2005 TRUE 319-2004 8/18/2004
Ward/Smart upper 99-03-2962 15 3 Crosskey Waterway Estates Section One Largo 468470.0045 TRUE 10/12/2005 TRUE 080-2005
Nolt Upper 01-03-0734 TRUE 10/12/2005 TRUE 317-2004
Davis Upper 00-03-5216 TRUE 10/12/2005 TRUE 079-2005
Lewis Upper 00-03-4385 9 17 Twin Lakes Largo 00550390.000000 TRUE 10/12/2005 TRUE 082-2005
Thompson upper 00-03-4087 9 5 Buccaneer Point Largo 00496131.012700 TRUE 10/12/2005 TRUE 081-2005
Lentine big pine 98-01-0902 21 10 Cahill Pines & Palms Big Pine 00246020.000000 TRUE 1/25/2006 TRUE 591-2002 12/18/2002
Maitner big pine 97-1-1498 TRUE 2/22/2006 TRUE 590-2002 12/18/2002
Calder big pine 97-01-0002 TRUE 2/22/2006 TRUE 592-2002 12/18/2002
Malanga big pine 96-1-1675 TRUE 2/22/2006 TRUE 118-2003 3/19/2003
Liscio Upper 01-03-1440 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 316-2005
Landers Upper 01-03-1414 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 317-2005
Escar Upper 01-03-0975 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 170-2005
Teach Upper 01-03-0007 27 Harris Ocean Pk Estates Largo 00447410.000000 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 169-2005
Upper 01-03-2545 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 416-2005
Upper 01-03-2260 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 414-2005
Thompson Upper 01-03-2149 32 8 Key Largo Ocean Shores Addn Largo 00499370.000000 TRUE 6/14/2006 TRUE 318-2005
Parkinson Upper 01-03-4558 5 16 Twin Lakes Largo 00550220.000000 TRUE 7/26/2006 TRUE 106-2006
Equizabal Upper 01-03-3908 TRUE 7/26/2006 TRUE 105-2006
Rivas Upper 01-03-3320 Sunrise Point Revised Plat Largo 00483810.000000 TRUE 7/26/2006 TRUE 417-2005
Upper 01-03-2546 TRUE 7/26/2006 TRUE 413-2005
Smith Upper 01-03-2060 20 Buccaneer Point Largo 00496131.015100 TRUE 7/26/2006 TRUE 107-2006
Cano Upper 01-03-3251 TRUE 9/13/2006 TRUE 206-2006
Thompson Upper 02-03-1371 14 Paradise Point Cove Largo 513810 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 320-2006
Thompson Upper 02-03-0851 28 Key Largo Ocean Shores Largo 499330 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 322-2004 8/18/2004
Luengo Upper 02-03-0793 27 Twin Lakes 2nd Add. Largo 551005.0003 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 313-2006
Merritt Upper 02-03-0421 18 Lime Grove Estates Largo 485670 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 314-2006
Bottenhorn Upper 02-03-0411 143 Port Largo Largo 452740 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 308-2006
Bottenhorn Upper 02-03-0410 142 Port Largo Largo 452730 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 307-2006
Sanabria Upper 02-03-0348 3 16 Twin Lakes Largo 550200 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 309-2006
Macleod Upper 02-03-0339 37 6 Winston Waterways #2 Largo 547080 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 318-2006
Correa Upper 01-03-4527 8 6 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amd. Ex!. Largo 498560 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 310-2006
Lombardo Upper 01-03-3929 5 2 South Creek Village Largo 466660 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 317-2006
Upper 01-03-2622 16 10 Key Largo Ocean Shores Addn Largo 499800 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 316-2006
Parkinson Upper 02-03-2172 26 2 Ocean Isle Estates Largo 538560 TRUE 12/19/2006 TRUE 315-2006
Garcia Upper 02-03-1255 15 1 Harbor Shores Largo 521670 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 311-2006
Arduino Upper 02-03-1085 2 Stillwright Point Largo 514350 TRUE 3f712007 TRUE 305-2006
Fried Upper 02-03-4419 10 3 Silver Lake Park Largo 453990 TRUE 3f712007 TRUE 634-2006
Rivero Upper 02-03-3864 13 7 Largo Gardens Largo 456770 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 606-2006
Pardo Upper 02-03-3737 4 5 Largo Sound Park Largo 471090 TRUE 3f712007 TRUE 607-2006
Bassil Upper 02-03-2766 27 14 Key Largo Ocean Shores Add. Largo 500930 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 605-2006
Knepper Upper 02-03-2627 12 10 Key Largo Beach Add. Largo 503020 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 608-2006
Gonzalez Upper 01-03-2502 8 7 Winston Waterways #2 Largo 547211.0008 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 312-2006
Bassett Upper 02-03-2302 9 13 Key Largo Beach Add. Largo 503400 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE 306-2006
Hupp Big Pine 02-01-0058 32 Doctors Arm 3rd Add See B Big Pine 312572.0033 TRUE 3/7/2007 TRUE see minutes 12/20/2006
Koblick Upper 03-03-0007 1 9 Anglers Park Largo 00552570.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 TRUE 205-2007 5/21/2007
Nemeth Upper 02-03-4499 7 13 Key Largo Beach Add. Largo 00503380.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 TRUE 089-2007 2/21/2007
Quero Upper 01-03-4441 23 2 Key Largo Beach Largo 00501780.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 TRUE 088-2007 2/21/2007
Parkinson Upper 02-03-3685 18 1 Ocean Isle Estates Largo 00538240.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 TRUE 090-2007 2/21/2007
McGarrity Upper 03-03-1521 1 5 Pamela Villa Largo 00464490.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 199-2007 5/21/2007
Casariego Upper 03-03-0694 15 10 Largo Sound Village Largo 00476030.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 198-2007 5/21/2007
Parkinson Upper 03-03-0667 17 3 Buccaneer Point Largo 00496131.006100 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 201-2007 5/21/2007
Parkinson Upper 03-03-0059 26 3 South Creek Village Largo 00467020.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 195-2007 5/21/2007
Woods Upper 02-03-4701 5 Santi Heights Largo 00487160.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 190-2007 5/21/2007
Rodriguez Upper 02-03-4498 1 Sunset Waterways Largo 00529770.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 196-2007 5/21/2007
Upper 02-03-3953 00474770.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 191-2007 5/21/2007
Leith Upper 02-03-3945 00489130.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 194-2007 5/21/2007
Upper 02-03-2710 10 4 Largo Sound Park Largo 00471030.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 189-2007 5/21/2007
Munoz Upper 02-03-2324 12 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores, Amended & Extended Largo 00497710.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 193-2007 5/21/2007
Cruz Upper 02-03-2163 17 9 Key Largo Park Amended Largo 00525220.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 188-2007 5/21/2007
Martinez Lower 02-01-3232 18 17 Cutthroat Harbor Estates 1st Add. Cudjoe 00186610.000000 TRUE 9/12/2007 TRUE 155-2007 4/18/2007
Upper 03-03-0783 20 19 Largo Sound Park 1 st Largo 00470060.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 230-2007 6/20/2007
Upper 03-03-0673 17 19 Largo Sound Park 1st Add. and adj. alley disclaime Largo 00470030.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 231-2007 6/20/2007
Pino Upper 00-03-3124 1 9 Stillwright Point Plat No 2 Largo 00515640.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 197-2007 5/21/2007
Rowland Upper 02-03-4609 7 8 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 00544690.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 186-2007 5/21/2007
Perez Upper 02-03-4412 23 11 Key Largo Ocean Shores Addition Largo 00500070.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 192-2007 5/21/2007
Upper 02-03-3951 5 10 Twin Lakes Largo 00549370.000000 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 187-2007 5/21/2007
Gavarrete Upper 02-03-3866 14 7 Amd. Winston Waterways #2 Largo 00547211.001400 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 229-2007 6/20/2007
Graves Upper 02-03-3857 431 Port Largo 5th Add. Largo 00453475.004700 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 228-2007 6/20/2007
Scanlon Lower 03-01-1893 39 Orchid Park Sugarloaf 00166977. 003900 TRUE 12/18/2007 TRUE 232-2007 6/20/2007
Upper 03-03-1786 6 5 Largo Sound Park Largo 00471110.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 297-2007 8/15/2007
Ramirez Upper 03-03-1444 29 8 Ocean Isle Estates Largo 00540330.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 296-2007 8/15/2007
Slavinski Upper 03-03-1381 14 1 Revised Plat of Sunrise Point Largo 00484520.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 295-2007 8/15/2007
Holeman Upper 03-03-0396 4 18 Largo Sound Park Largo 00469860.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 357-2007 9/19/2007
Holeman Upper 03-03-0394 3 18 Largo Sound Park Largo 00469850.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 356-2007 9/19/2007
Holeman Upper 03-03-0393 2 18 Largo Sound Park Largo 00469840.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 355-2007 9/19/2007
Holeman Upper 03-03-0390 1 18 Largo Sound Park Largo 00469830.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 354-2007 9/19/2007
Scott Upper 03-03-0149 4 2 Winston Park Largo 00545650.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 561-2007 12/19/2007
Rothdeutsch Big Pine 03-01-2303 6 4 Port Pine Heights Big Pine 00289710.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 TRUE 044-2007 2/20/2008
Andrus Upper 02-03-0903 39 6 Winston Waterways #2 Largo 00547110.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 FALSE
Cicalese Upper 03-03-2077 16 8 Ocean Isle Estates Largo 00540200.000000 TRUE 6/13/2007 FALSE
Pacho Upper 03-03-5684 SW 1/2 9 & 12 Largo Sound Village Largo 00476450.000100 TRUE 12/18/2007 FALSE
Hann Upper 02-03-3148 7 7 Anglers Park Largo 00522090.000000 TRUE 3/4/2008 FALSE 200-2007 5/21/2007
Zambrana Upper 03-03-1615 6 3 Blue Water Trailer Village #4 Largo 00489136.010600 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 488-2007 11/14/2007
Heaps Upper 03-03-1273 535 Port Largo 5th Add. Largo 00453475.015100 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 487-2007 11/14/2007
Presas Upper 03-03-0814 14 14 Key Largo Ocean Shores Addn Largo 00500800.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 492-2007 11/14/2007
Gonzalz Upper 03-03-0799 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 562-2007 12/19/2007
Adm Relief applied
Sample Upper 03-03-0058 5-7 9 Largo Sound Park Largo 00471940.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 057-2008 2/20/2008
Crum Upper 03-03-4566 5 5 South Creek Village Largo 00467300.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 048-2008 2/20/2008
Perez, Jr. Upper 03-03-4422 3 1 Lime Grove Estates Section 1 Largo 00485150.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 055-2008 2/20/2008
Castillo Upper 03-03-4421 9 1 Lime Grove Estates Section 1 Largo 00485210.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 054-2008 2/20/2008
Thomas Upper 03-03-3459 805 Plat of Survey of Lime Grove Estates Largo 00486852.13 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 563-2007 12/19/2007
Pardo Upper 03-03-3286 10 5 Largo Sound Village Largo 00474780.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 049-2008 2/20/2008
Layer Upper 03-03-2937 2 4 Twin Lakes Largo 00548470.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 489-2007 11/14/2007
Rodriguez Upper 03-03-2907 4 4 Pamela Villa Largo 00464290.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 492-2007 11/14/2007
Pardo Upper 03-03-2715 9 3 Largo Sound Village Largo 00474370-000100 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 050-2008 2/20/2008
Pardo Upper 03-03-2714 11 3 Largo Sound Village Largo 00474370.000300 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 052-2008 2/20/2008
Pardo Upper 03-03-2713 10 3 Largo Sould Village Largo 00474370.000200 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 051-2008 2/20/2008
Pardo Upper 03-03-2702 12 3 Key Largo Village Largo 00474370.000400 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 053-2008 2/20/2008
Zambrana Upper 03-03-2600 34 4 Blue Water Trailer Village Section 4 Largo 00489136.018000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 058-2008 2/20/2008
Root Upper 03-03-2467 11& 12 7 Twin Lakes Largo 00548840.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 TRUE 056-2008 2/20/2008
Hoefert Upper 04-03-1710 26 3 Ocean Park Village Largo 446040 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Parkinson Upper 04-03-1618 18 1 Harris Ocean Park Estates Largo 00447090.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Parkinson Upper 04-03-1614 5 1 Harris Ocean Park Estates Largo 00446960.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Parkinson Upper 04-03-1610 17 1 Harris Ocean Park Estates Largo 00447080.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Parkinson Upper 04-03-1607 3 3 Ocean Park Village Largo 00445810.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Neudorff Upper 04-03-1319 9 8 Marion Park Largo 00521190.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Ekblom Upper 04-03-1123 10 4 Sunrise Point Revised Largo 00484620.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
McCaffrey Upper 04-03-1113 5 Paradise Point Cove Largo 00514050.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Ohlsson Upper 04-03-0781 9 Cross Key Waterways Estates Sec. Largo 00468471.006700 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Fried Upper 04-03-0746 17 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 00545010.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Fried Upper 04-03-0668 20 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 00545040.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Quintana Upper 04-03-0343 185 Port Largo Largo 00453160.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
De La Osa Upper 03-03-0821 398 Port Largo 5th Add. Largo 00453475.001400 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Morris Upper 03-03-5358 9 7 Twin Lakes Largo 00548820.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 04-03-5210 22 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amended & Extended Largo 497810 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Avila Upper 03-03-5209 13 1 Amd. & Ex!. Key Largo Ocean Shores Largo 497720 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-5208 21 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amended & Extended Largo 497800 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-5207 17 1 Amd. & Ex!. Plat Key Largo Ocean Shores Largo 00497760.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-5206 18 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amd. & Ext. Largo 00497770.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-5205 19 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amd. & Ext. Largo 00497780.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Munoz Upper 03-03-5204 14 1 Key Largo Ocean Shores Amended & Extended Largo 00497730.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Otero Upper 03-03-4600 22 6 Winston Waterways #2 Largo 00546930.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Gom ez Upper 03-03-4595 14 1 Twin Lakes Largo 548130 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-4290 23 7 Largo Gardens Largo 00456870.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-4289 24 7 Largo Gardens Largo 00456880.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Upper 03-03-4212 21 7 Largo Gardens Largo 00456850.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Gonzalez Upper 03-03-4140 6 7 Key Largo Beach Largo 00502530.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Zal esky Upper 04-03-3887 14 2 Pamela Villa Largo 463940 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Nolt Upper 04-03-3593 22 2 Winston Park Largo 00545830.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Parkinson Upper 02-03-3073 1 10 Bowens Addition to Rivera Village Largo 00512580.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 609-2006
Lawrence Upper 03-03-2750 6 2 Tavernier Ocean Shores Largo 00482780.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 490-2007 11/14/2007
Reisman Upper 02-03-2401 36 6 Winston Waterways No 2 Largo 00547070.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Teach Upper 01-03-2347 30 2 Harris Ocean Pk Estates Largo 00447440.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 419-2005 11/16/2005
Teach Upper 01-03-2345 29 2 Harris Ocean Pk Estates Largo 00447430.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 418-2005 11/16/2005
Martin Upper 03-03-2336 10 Twin Lakes 1st Add. Largo 00550850.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 491-2007 11/14/2007
Costa Upper 03-03-2322 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 486-2007 11/14/2007
Dreas Upper 04-03-2210 19 9 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 545030 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Dreas Upper 04-03-2209 18 9 Bahia Mar Estates Largo 545020 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
Cannon Upper 02-03-2086 8 14 Bowens Add. Riviera Village Largo 00513130.000000 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE 560-2007 11/14/2007
Pearson Lower 04-01-1906 9 21 Cutthroat Harbor Estates Cudjoe 180980 FALSE 3/4/2008 FALSE
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Tiffany Stankiewicz, Sf. Planning Technician
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Beneficial Use
The intention of this memo is to clarifY Beneficial Use applications. The Department has
recently initiated a tracking system of Beneficial Use applications. There are currently
135 parcels being reviewed. Below is a table indicating resolution numbers of Beneficial
Use Determinations that went to the Board of County Commissioners. Please find the
attached table indicated the Beneficial Use history for the Department based on records
from the Clerk of the Court for Monroe County and other historical records.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
Monroe County Growth Managelnent Di vi sion
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional andfair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management
From: Beth Bergh, Land Steward
Date: May 8, 2008
RE: Data request
*This memo reflects documents submitted by Ms. Bergh
Please find attached information requested by the Department of Community Affairs
regarding habitat acquisition.
I have a provided a page from the Monroe County Land Acquisition and Management
Master Plan which describes the process of land acquisition through the Monroe County
Land Authority. Also provided is a list of vacant parcels and associated acreage and
values.
Monroe County Land Acquisition and Management Master Plan
the recent boundary amendments. Based on January 2006 numbers from DEP Division of
State Lands, the state owns approximately 8200 of the 19,300 acres in the three Florida Forever
projects in the Keys. The federal government, Monroe County, the MCLA, and non-profit
conservation groups own approximately 2900 acres within the Florida Forever boundaries.
Some of these acres will likely be sold or donated to the state. About 8300 acres, or 43%, are
still privately owned.
Federal
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has had a minimal level of land acquisition activity in the Keys
in the last few years, and no substantial land acquisition funding is anticipated in the near future.
Monroe County
Most local government land acquisitions have been through the Monroe County Land Authority
or donation of land pursuant to the county's ROGO ordinance (see "ROGO lots", below). The
MCLA serves all of the Keys, not just unincorporated Monroe County. The MCLA acqui~es a
variety of land for conservation, infrastructure, and affordable housing needs. The Monroe
County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) sits as the governing board of the MCLA and
has appointed a five-member advisory committee. The annual revenue stream of the MCLA is
approximately $2.4 million, derived primarily from a lodging bed tax and a surcharge on
admissions to state parks in the Keys. One million of this annual income is restricted to use for
Key West; the balance of $1.4 million is available to the rest of the Keys, including
unincorporated Monroe County.
Much of the MCLA staff time is spent coordinating with the state's land acquisition efforts.
Oftentimes the MCLA acquires lands within Florida Forever project boundaries. These lands
are usually transferred to the state and the MCLA is reimbursed. From January 2004 through
May 2006, the MCLA acquired 19 acres of land within Florida Forever boundaries at a cost of
$500,000. The MCLA also acquires environmentally sensitive lands outside of Florida Forever
boundaries. Since January 2004, the MCLA has acquired 15 acres of environmentally sensitive
land outside of Florida Forever project boundaries at a cost of $2.1 million. In addition, 185
parcels, about 21 acres, have been donated through the ROGO process during this time period,
91 one of these in 2005 alone.
Non-aovernmental Oraanizations
The Conservation Fund
The Conservation Fund is an environmental nonprofit dedicated to protecting America's most
important landscapes and waterways with a partnership-driven approach. The Fund is currently
pursuing potential acquisitions in Great White Heron and National Key Deer National Wildlife
Refuges. Recently, at the request of the FWS, the Fund completed a two-year project in the
Lower Keys that involved 17 lots and one owner. The lots were optioned by the Fund, which
then coordinated with the FWS, the state and the county so that each entity could identify the
lots they desired. The Fund then closed on the lots and coordinated transfer of the lots to each
agency. The Conservation Fund is willing to work with agencies in the Keys at their request to
assist in land conservation efforts.
The Nature Conservancy
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is an environmental nonprofit with the mission to preserve the
plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by
protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. In 2002 TNC purchased about 600 acres
of hammock and mangrove in the Upper Keys. Most will go to the Everglades National Park
and a small portion to Florida Forever. TNC has limited funding available for land acquisition in
6
Q)
~
5
.....
><:
e
0..
0..
~
II)
I-<
~
00
5)
,D
g
Z
-..
00
II)
'12
II)
0..
e
0..
~
I-<
II)
~
"'0
s:::
~
II)
~
o
~
"'0
s:::
~
"2
.....
~
5
00
II)
"'0
;::l
'0
><:
II)
'-'
;>..
-
s:::
;::l =
o .!2
U_
g ~
S.s
o s:::
~ .~
"'0 . ~
II) ~
~c..
I-< c..
o o:l
e->.
o '5
u c..
s::: 0
'S l5.
;::It-
s:::8
..... N
~~
11)-
u c
ta 0
0..]
..... 00
~~
u o:l
~ -
>0
.. =
= ..
=
CJ
=
~
'-
=
=1:1::
"Cl
~ ~
~ =
~-
~ =
:~
<
~
-
~
CJ
""
=
Q.
~
..
=
~
..
""
Q.
O\oo..-~
1.01.00\0
N..-V) ~
.... .... .... 00
-.:t......NO
-.:t~~o
V)NN ~
~ ~ ~V)
r-IO......IO
oo~-.:t......
~~~~
~
=00
~r-
",,00
CJr-
<
Q.
:a
~
""
~
=
~
=
~V)~
oo~o~
00
~......r-~
V)V)r-~
~-.:tNV)
-.:t 0
v)~~0\
...... N ...... 00
,....; ~ -.:t~ V)
V) 1.0 00 0\
NV)OO......
,...: t-.... ~ 0
r-~V)oo
-.:t ~ ~ -.:t
~ ~
~ 1.0
;~ 1.0
~......oor-......
t"'............'"
<~ ~
"Cl
~ ~
~ =
~-
~ =
:~
<
V)
V)~
1.00
......
~......-.:too
NO\O......
-.:t~ -.:t 0 O\~
V) ~ ~~
O\r-......o
r-ooNN
~ 0\ -.:t ~
00 ~ ~V)
V) 0\ IO-.:t
V)~-.:t1O
~~~~
N
N~
NN
......~
-.:t
=1:1:: "~N
- = ~NIOO\
='- = CJO-.:tO\
"=CJ"" ~V)~
~ : ~~
"Cl
~ ~
~ =
~-
~ =
:~
<
~
-
~
CJ
""
=
Q.
~
=
~
""
CJ
<
0\
0......
00
~......
-.:t
r-
1.0
O\~
V)
......
-
"" <t: =
Q.}1--4~"""''''''''
......-=
E= -Eo-
00
"'0
s:::
~
.....:l
u
.....
:g
0..
II)
;S
I-<
c2
5)
~
II)
;S
II)
s:::
.~
II)
-
II)
"'0
o
.....
I-<
II)
;>..
~
-
Q)
;::l
-
~
;>
"'0
II)
00
00
II)
00
00
~
"'0
~
-..
..s:::
Q) ~
;::lo::l
-;>..
~,D
"'0"'0
II) II)
i:l t;j
II) II)
00 ;::l
~ g'
"'0"::'-
~
00
II)
t)
~
4-<
o
g
00
II)
..s:::
-
I-<
II)
E=:
II)
..s:::
-
..s:::
.....
.~
Cd
~
"'0
5)
~
"'0
s:::
~
00
"'0
s:::
~
.....:l
0\ rIl~
0\ -
00 "'0 II)
~ s::: ~
~ ~ a
4-< 0\ 4-<
o 00 0
500 5)
;::loo ,D
]gg ~
- ~
~r- II)
~oo ..s:::
CIJ .... ~ ......,
U 1.0 II) II)
ta 00 ;>.. ~
o..~~-;::l
4-<N-:u
0(011)-
I-<O~ ~
~ ~ r- II) I-<
1I)50;S~
;>..;::l......",or-'
~s:::0S:::;>..
rIl]o~,D
"'0_001-<"'0
~ II)~ ~2
.....:l~o~g
.~ B U ~]
:O-UII)
;::l~0..S:::~
0.. ~ 00] 8
B ] .S ..... ta
:9 g ;g gfce
~] ~'@ ~
5) I-< ~ ...... ;::l
..... II) - ,.... 0
E-<E=:~~5h
~..s:::~V5..s:::
- ~~2~~
u ~ II) ~ II) II)
II) II) "'0 I-< II) 0.. I-<
Q) ;>.. "'0 0 I-< II) 0
U'.l~<t:~U~~
-..
..s:::
.....
II)
o::l
;>..
,D
"'0
II)
"'0
';>
e
0..
'-'
I-<
~
~
-
U'.l
......
o
00
"'0
~
.....:l
u
.....
:0
;::l
0..
s:::
.9
.....
~
u
.9
;>..
,D
-
s:::
~
u
~
>
--
.~
:0
;::l
0..
II)
-
~
II)
I-<
U
o
-
"'0
II)
00
;::l
00
fr
-
U'.l
...... N~-.:tv)1O
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Judi Steele, Assistant County Engineer
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Affordable Housing Reservations
The intention of this memo is to provide clarification on the additional data requested
concerning stormwater outflows and stormwater projects. This memo constructed from
emails and other documents authored by Ms. Steele.
The information requested in your fax on stormwater outfalls and capacity analysis must
have been for the incorporated areas. The County' Stormwater Management Master Plan
identified four stormwater improvement projects for which we provide updates to DCA. I
have attached a brief summary of the status of the four stormwater projects. Please let me
know if you need additional information. Weare working on the Wastewatef.
DCA De-designation Report
Stormwater Update
May 5,2008
The following is an update on the four stormwater projects that were identified in the
Stormwater Management Master Plan:
1. US 1 - The County entered into a Joint Participation Agreement (JP A) with FDOT
to design and implement stormwater improvements at a) Rockland Key to Shark
Key, b) North Harris to Park Channels and c) Bow to Kemp Channel. The
Engineering Division prepared a Request for Qualifications for stormwater
designed and received 13 responses on April 8, 2008. The selection committee
ranked the responses in a public meeting on May 5, 2008.
A request to approve negotiating a fee with the highest ranked respondent is on
the May 21, 2008 BOCC agenda. A contract for design services will follow upon
negotiation of the fee.
2. Card Sound Road - proposed improvements consist of sodding the shoulders and
creating berms at the toe of slope in the parking areas. The shoulders along the
road have naturally re-vegetated since the completion of the road project in FY
2003-2004; the balance of the work will be performed in FY 09.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
3. Marathon Government Center - Improvements consist of cleaning sumps in catch
basins, flushing pipes in exfiltration trenches and rehabilitating the existing well
and installing a sediment removal device. This property belongs to the State, and
they are responsible for the improvements.
4. Burton Drive - Proposed improvements include installing a swale adjacent to US
1 on the east side and Burton Drive on the south side, and vegetating the swale
and the remainder of the right of way. The portion of the project on US 1 is
FDOT's responsibility. Monroe County Public Works completed installation of a
seepage trench and swale in the right of way and approximately 10 feet onto
county property at Burton Drive in 2006.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 2
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Rich Jones, Senior Administrator Marine Resources Office
Date: June 9, 2008
RE: Liveaboard Vessel Summary
The intention of this memo is to provide some insight into the number of liveaboard
vessels currently in use in Monroe county.
The number of liveaboards in the Keys, both in marinas and anchored out, fluctuates
annually and seasonally. No recent surveys have been conducted to provide accurate data
on the number of liveaboards in the Keys.
However, several studies over the years have been conducted which provide some data
regarding liveaboards:
Antonini study (1989-1990):
This is the only study to date that specifically focused on liveaboards. The study
characterized liveaboards patterns, lifestyles, distribution and a variety of other
demographics. The study indicated that approximately 1,388 liveaboard vessels were
found throughout the Keys. Data indicated that about 75% of liveaboard vessels were
docked shoreside and the remaining 25% were anchor-outs.
1993 Marine Facilities study:
This study, which was conducted for the Monroe County Marine Resources Department,
listed the number of liveaboard vessels at marinas throughout the Keys. Approximately
568 liveaboard vessels were determined to be docked at marinas. However, there were
numerous gaps in the data, with data for many marinas missing or simply not available.
2002 Anchorage study:
This study, conducted by Marine Resources staff, focused on established anchorages
throughout the Keys. The study indicated 15 anchorages containing a total of
approximately 870 vessels. Assuming that half of the vessels are occupied by
liveaboards (many vessels are simply stored at anchor), that would indicate 435
liveaboard vessels. In addition, are the two established mooring fields which moor
approximately 300 vessels, about three quarters of which are assumed to be liveaboards,
.
. .
.
.
. .
. -
I
.
Page 1
providing a total of 225 liveaboards on moorings. The combined numbers of anchor-outs
and legally moored vessels totals approximately 660 liveaboard vessels.
2007 Marine Facilities study:
The 2007 Marine Facility Study was conducted for Monroe County Marine Resources by
South Florida Regional Planning Council. The study surveyed all marine facilities in the
Keys, including marinas. A slip count at marinas was provided in the study
(approximately 5110 slips at 116 marinas). Data was collected on whether or not the
marinas had liveaboards, but no liveaboard numbers were collected. The data indicated
that approximately half of the marinas surveyed (53 of 116 marinas) allowed liveaboards.
Synopsis
While data does not exist for the current number of liveaboards in the Keys, some
information can be extrapolated from the above studies.
The Antonini study in 1989-1990 indicated that there were approximately 347 anchor-
outs. More recent estimates (from the 2002 Anchorage study) indicate 660 anchor-outs
(including liveaboards at mooring fields). This increase of 90% is reasonable to assume,
as the availability of affordable housing on land has become more of an issue causing an
increasing number of residents to move onto boats. And approximately one third of those
anchor-outs are in designated mooring fields.
Numbers of liveaboards shoreside (tied up at marinas) is not currently available.
However, some patterns can be identified. The redevelopment trend in the past decade
for marinas has been a slight increase in numbers of slips. Assuming the percentage of
liveaboards slips at marinas has not changed, but the number of slips has increased by
approximately 10% that would result in a 10% increase of liveaboards shoreside since the
Antonini study, resulting in an increase from 1041 to 1145 liveaboards at marinas.
The combined estimates of anchor-outs (660) and liveaboards at marinas (1145) would
total 1805 liveaboards in the Keys. This is a 30% increase from 1990. While these
numbers are estimates based on data from several studies conducted over the past
eighteen years, the information does appear to correlate with general observational and
anecdotal data made available to staff via site visits, phone inquiries and comments at
public meetings. Numbers of liveaboard vessels in the Keys appear to generally be on
the increase. The increase in numbers of liveaboards is exacerbated by the affordable
housing crisis, as well as an increasing number of designated mooring fields which
provide for liveaboards.
.
. .
.
.
. .
. -
I
.
Page 2
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional andfair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management
From: Kimberly Rohrs, Senior GIS Planner
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Data request
This memo describes the information provided to fulfill your map and data request.
Staff provided analysis of:
. Square footage in each FLUM category and the development potential number of
unit and floor area ratio that could be built based on assigned density within each
FLUM.
. The development potential number of units based on assigned density within each
Land Use category.
lie, ['
o
+:l
CU
I~ ';
I/J Q)
C ....
~<(
c ....
x 0
CU..Q
::E!:!:,
COIO~
O~O
o
.....1000
00
10.....
NO
o
<(
Z
10 N
N .
.0
o
01000
N
o
010
~ ~~
1'-10
001010
~ N ~ .
N.....~N
~r-: ~N
I'--CIOIOI'-
..... N
LL
C"
en
.....
Q)
a.
::J
"C<( <(
.....Z Z
00000
COCON~
It) It) It) N_
M('t)~~
~~.....I'--
.....
000
~NN
N.....1t)
~r-:~
I'--CIO.....
.....
-
u.
C"
en
....
Q)
a.
::J
"C
.....
~
I/J
C
Q) ::J
Cl "C
"C 0
~ ::J::JIO::J::J
CU ::J::J"C"CO"C"C
OQ)::J"C"ClOlOibCX?co
Ob"CCOCON~~~"7
<(<(.....~MOOOO('l)
en('l).....('I)~l'-enco
en COCONCO CO 10 10
lOenN~coMLrio
10 10 CO coCO CO CO N
~~I'-.....~COI'-~
,... 10 N 0 en CO 0
Nen~ encol'-co
encoco IOI'-OCO
('I) CO 10 NN('I)('I)
10 N('I)('I)
LL
~
.5
cu
~
<(
:E
::>
..J
u.
u.
()() ()..J~::C
_~:E~~~~~
~('I) ~ 0 ~~ 00
en CO CO en
10 .0 CO .
. co . . .....
('I) 10 10 co ('I)
en en 0 ~co
NN..... O~
('I) ..... I'- en en
101010 10 ('I)
('I) 10 N NCO
NNN N.....
0
I-
10 ('I) ('I) co 0 coo 0
E I'-COIO ~ co
en en co ~ en
8 o en . Lri
.... .10 oen
u.CO ;1) en I'- .....
c 0('1) CO ('I) ~
cu eno I'-
~ ._ 10
-0 co..... en
~ CUco CO~ .....
~en 10 ..... CO
I/J CU
C ~
Q)
- <(
c
....
x 0
CU 0
:E. u:
0 en coo 0 co 10 en
o ('I) ('t) I'-- I'-CO
CO 0 ..... ('t) ON
I'- ..... ~('I)
CO 10
CO
.....
10
('I)
.....
0
I-
~ 0 NO) .....0 CIO 0 ('t)
0) o CIO CIO CIO It)
C ('t) ('t) ..... ('t) N
CU .....
~
'>
:!:::
I/J
C
Q)
Cl
"C
Q)
-
CU E
0
..Q 0
<(. ....
u.
:E u.
::> ()() ()..J~::C
..J
u. - ~~~~~~~
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional andfair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management
From: J. Bryan Davisson, GIS Planner
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Wastewater Hotspot and Coldspot Maps
Please find attached information requested by the Department of Community Affairs
regarding wastewater service areas.
I have provided PDF maps delineating the Monroe County Wastewater Hotspot and
Coldspot areas. Maps also indicate existing wastewater facilities and the number of
buildings located within each Coldspot.
1\lge I
co
o
o
N
>-
C'lS
:!
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
2~~
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
i
ro ~
2V
:5~
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
(f) ~
(f) g' .u
.~ ~ ~
~ (]]
" '5
~ E
s ~
"' "'
i~~
"' " "
15 (5 (5
I U U
Ii;
1U
5:
2
~
g>
~
dj
IIII
'j'\"'::~~"'"
'" ~-~
1'"" ..,..~ -..F:-:':-c../~
~~~)
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
" ,
. ~>it.
":',.
III
"0
a.
III
"'C
0",
t):"Q
"'C 0
c-
",LL
If) >.~
OeD
o.:JN
-E 8 ~
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(9
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
(9(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
o ~
8~
~C3
5~
"m
".6-
~~
(fJro
~l
"'
g, ~
g, ~ ~
:Q (]] Q)
":; "5 rti
~ E E
:!: s: ~
~ .l!l S
.l!loag'
8. g- (J) :j:;
-5 ~ ~ ~
iiil
-('l."::~~~~
f" ~'~"-:~-C.;~
~~~)
..,
i'l
z....c: ~
z
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2~~
Oco
o.:JN
2 0 >-
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
K
.
.'
:..~:
"'
(f) g, ~
.g'_ 32 .~
'S LL
~ (]] Q)
:::l :5 rtl
~ E E
~ ~ ~
g'
~
dj
IIII
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
;".
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
~1[
8~
"' "'
j!l 8. 8.
8. "' "'
"' " "
15 (5 (5
I U U
/''''~'':<~'''~
. --"
V ..,..~ - ..F:-;.:_, ::.
~~~)
II
II
..~'- -
'-- ....\,~~~::'
~
III
"0 (fJ
5} (ij
]2 (f) C
~~....~ "' g,~ ci
.... ~ g ~ 'u
~~ gdl';::!)!~
lIl'O() dl'51'JE~
"0 ~o 5 1" 5: ~o:
0.50 >5.m (jUJ
2 0 N ~ > g ;..(!J
O()~202> 55
=::g2 ~~!E 8~
"* C ~ 8 (l ~ ~I'i
I~ IIII a
roro
81
~~~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
2~~
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
(f) g, ~
.~ ~ ~
~ (]] Q)
:::l :5 rtl
~ E E
s ~ ~
(f) ~ ~ cO>
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ tTI
IIII
f~6:}:?~f~i:,
.:~,~~,J
\(:~:~:,,!Lj~~'
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
00
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
"'C
0",
t):"Q
"'C 0
c-
",LL
'0()
-E ~8
o.:JN
-E 8 ~
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
<fJ
(9
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
(9<fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
o ~
8~
~C3
5~
"m
~.3'
~~
roo.
8~
"'
(f) ~
~ .u
g, ~ ~
:Q (]] Q)
":; :5 rti
(]] ~ $
..c :;:: .m
~ ~ ro
(f) 2 S
.l!l 8. 8. g>
~~:Q~
15 (5 0 t.TI
iiil
:{'\...~~~~
/' "'~"-:~-c.;~
(:12:- 3~:!~:i:J
t', '~<<-Ui' ,>
~\:~$?
Q)
i3
z....c: ~
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
(j)
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
"'C
0",
t):"Q
"'C 0
c-
",LL
'0()
2~8
~5N
-E 8 ~
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
<fJ
(9
"'
1l,c ~
.u
"' " '"
g'=u..
:Q d3 Ii>
~ ~ ~
.c .c Q)
~ ~ gj
(f) 2 S
j!l 8. 8. g>
~~:Q~
15 (5 0 t.TI
iiil
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
(9<fJ
,('l
;".
CC
o ~
8~
~C3
5~
"m
~.3'
~~
roo.
8~
:{'\...~~~~
/' "'~"-:~-c.;~
.f~(C:- 3~:!I:i:J
t',~ <<.[[,f ,>
\(:~$?
..,
i'l
z....c: ~
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
o
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
o.:JN
2 0 >-
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
g, ~
.:g,~ 32 .~
'S LL
~ (]] Q)
:::l :5 rtl
~ E E
~ ~ ~
j!l 8. 8. g>
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ tTI
IIII
t6Y;~h
<.!:: r- ~.'Gi~'" :.~
\~.>~~~~:.j'
\. . "'. "0.;1-'
':I~""r:".oo:::.~-:..'"
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
"t""""
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
C
a.
III
31
o '"
O"tl
"'0 .~
c-
",LL
(/) >. CO
-_0
OCO
o.:JN
III 0 >-
cO",
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
~~
"'~
5~
8~
~C3
~~
"'
~.3'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
g, ~
(f) .u
.~ ~ ~
~ (]] Q)
:::l :5 rtl
~ E E
~ ~ ~
.l!l 8. 8. g>
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ tTI
IIII
~~~
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
C\I
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
O"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
g.:JN
08 ~
=:~2
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
g\j~ i
~ d3 ~ ~v
d3'5,*:6~
E E ~ ~o:
s 'i: gj '?~
(f) 2 (f) S ~c-
8.8.8."'8~
-5~~~ ~~
I U U tlj ~o
IIII ~!
8"2
(fJ~
roo.
8~
/"..::::~"h.
v ..' ,-.....-:.:c../~
~~~)
..,
z....c: ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
C')
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
O"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2~~
Oco
o.:JN
2 0 >-
00 '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
~1[
8~
"'
(f) ~
(f) g' .u
.~ ~ ~
~ (]]
" '5
~ E
s ~
"' "'
i~~
"' " "
15 (5 (5
I U U
Ii;
1U
5:
2
~
g>
~
dj
IIII
/''''~'':'"~'''~
. --.,
v ..,..~ - ..F:-;,:_,.::'
~~~)
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
""""
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
2~~
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
i
ro ~
2V
:6~
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
g, ~
.~ g ~
~ d3 Ii>
:::l :5 rtl
~ E $
2
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ .~
-5 ~ ~ ~
I U U tlj
IIII
'j'\"'::~~"'"
'" .~-~
1'"" ,,''',-..F:-:':-C../~
f~('li'- 3~~&:i:,
"~ '~<<-Qi' J
'\:g~~'
..,
i'l
z.....c. ~
o
z
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
L!)
"t""""
c..
CO
~
::~~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
O:"Q
"'C 0
c-
",LL
(/) >. CO
oe8
o.:JN
-E 8 ~
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
<fJ
(9
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
(9<fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
o ~
8~
~C3
~~
"'
~.3'
~~
roo.
8~
"'
g, $
~ ~ ~
:Q (]] Q)
":; :5 rti
~ E ~
~ ~ gj
"' "' S
2 a ~ .~
~~32~
~ ~ 8 tTI
IIII
~~~
..,
i'l
z....c: ~
z
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
g.:JN
08 ~
=:~2
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
"' c
U) .~ ~ ci
~ ;g ~ 'u
~ d3 ~ ~v
d3'5,*:6~
:5 E $ ~o:
~ ~ "* '?~
2 2 (f) ~ ~c-
8.8.8.'" 00
2 ~ ~ E 8.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~C3
IIII ~!
s~
roro
81
ftal;~)
, _ u\tLUi' .of
.i;.,,:^~;:~:,,;;~
\:<:,,!~3~'i
..,
z....c: ~
o
z
I"
II
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2~~
Oco
o.:JN
2 0 >-
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
Ii;
1U
5:
2
~
g>
~
dj
IIII
"'
"' g>
.~ ~
~ (]]
" '5
~ E
s ~
"' "'
i~~
"' " "
15 (5 (5
I U U
c
~ t
u.. 2:g
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
/''''~'':'"~'''~
. --.,
V ..,..~ - ..F:-;,:_,.::'
~~~)
I-
II
"t""""
c..
co
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
2~~
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
CC
8.~
>
~C3
~~
.al
~.6'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
"' Q)
0) :e
t ! ~
d3 ~ ~
:5 :5 Q)
'i: 'i: gj
(f) 2 2 S
~8.8.'"
~ :Q :Q ~
~ 8 8 ~
IIII
'j'\"'::~~"'"
'" ~-~
,1'".^"'':~ -..F:-:':-C../~
~~~)
I'"
If
(j)
"t""""
'+-
o
(j)
"t""""
c..
CO
~
III
"0
a.
III
31
o '"
t)"tl
'U "i::
c..2
",LL
2 ~~
Oeo
o.:JN
2 0 >-
o t) '"
IQj2
.... 0
Qj ....
- c
'" 0
~2
1ii
~
(fJ
(ij
c
t
,,~
EIij
~o:
0(fJ
,('l
"'~
5~
8~
~C3
~~
"'
~.3'
8"@
(fJ~
roo.
8~
"'
g, ~
.:g,~ 32 .~
.S LL
~ (]] Q)
:::l :5 rtl
~ E ~
s 'i: ~
"' "' >
j!l 8. 8. g>
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ tTI
IIII
""",~ :::~,.~
1'"" ..,..~ -..F:-:':-C../~
~~~)
I"
II
MEMORANDUM
MONROE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
We strive to be caring, professional and fair
To: Andrew O. Trivette, Growth Management Division Director
From: Tiffany Stankiewicz, Sf. Planning Technician
Date: June 10, 2008
RE: Affordable Housing Reservations
The intention of this memo is to clarify the Affordable Housing Allocations reserved by
the Board of County Commissioners.
See attachment 2 for the affordable housing reservations.
Monroe County Growth Management Division
Page 1
roro
00
00
N N
L()-GT
N",
.c '"
2:;;;
'"
:;;;
2
0 <Xi
z a
a
N
e m-
e Q; 0 .~
0 ~ "g <(
'"" ~
~ " <(
Q) Q) 0
~ 5: '" 0
Q) :!! u
'" u E
:" 0
"' C
e Q)
0 (fJ
'"" "
~ :" ro
~ E: :s
Q) ~
'" C
:J
<U " I
Q)
>- ~ LL
0 <(
Q) a
(!) Qj
0 '" ~
'"
u
Q)
,- 2:
E " Q)
~ .~ (f)
(f) 0 :"
c 0 a
0 z c a
~ a
E -0 a
2: :J a
Q) 0 .c cj
(f) e " 0 :J f"-
Q) (; 0 Q) c m
[t: .~ 2: 0 I (')
I 0 ~ u LL ro
z .Q <( a
LL :" Q) a
<( ro (f) (D a
'" ~
0 -" u ill
0 "<t Q) -"
0 co 2: E
en Q) :J
>- U (f) C
Q) :" Q)
Q) 2:
" Q) ro
Q) c 11)
(f)
:" 0:: Q)
(f) OJ ro
.c i'i5 :"
0 :J C oS
z OJ 0 .3'
j c '"
.w 0 ",
:J '" to
w 0 0:: Q)
c .c <l
0 <U Q) '" 0
~ ", Q.
i Q) :0 '"
'" '" 0 .2
u .2
'" 0 ro <Xi
w J2 >t= c a
c " '" 0 11) a
0 ~ .c N
~ Q) to
rn 2: ." cj
u -" 0 0
0 ~ c (f) Z ~
'" Q) :J :" ]1 ",
~ '" ro '"
c Q) U '" :;;;
w a
.~ ~ a Q) (f)
> ill
N ill c
I Z Q) >
0 (D- o u 0
~ >- N :" ro u
-" .c ro 0 0
~ e 0 a .~
0 u ro a 5:
-< "g u :;;; N Q) <l
0 '> ro
c ~ "' N-
o 0 ",Q) Q)
Q) <l
0 '" (f) ",-'" <l
() <( :;;;.'3 <(
OJ
c
0
J
;C