Item O02 02
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY of MONROE Mayor Craig Cates,District 1
The Florida Keys Mayor Pro Tern Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
Michelle Lincoln,District 2
James K.Scholl,District 3
m' David Rice,District 4
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
October 18, 2023
Agenda Item Number: 02
2023-1673
BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Administration
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Tennyson
n/a
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of the Monroe County 2024 State Legislative Agenda.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
Staff is seeking Board approval of the issues presented herein to be included in the County's 2024 State Legislative
Program.
Each year,the BOCC and staff evaluate the trends and issues affecting all County programs and services to identify
potential policy or substantive legislative issues. Staff has provided a list of substantive priorities and general issues
that we should monitor for the 2024 State legislative session; and welcomes the addition or deletion of issues that
the Board deems appropriate for the County's 2024 legislative efforts.
Most of the County's legislative efforts are incremental and focused on issues that are built upon over several
sessions, such as our water quality and land acquisition needs,the importance of wind insurance affordability, and
protection of grandfathered vacation rental regulations; these will continue to be legislative priorities in the 2024
session.
Each year the agenda also reflects changes or additional tasks in response to new challenges, new ideas for existing
challenges, or new opportunities for funding sources.
The 2024 legislative agenda includes the following priorities:
• Florida Keys Stewardship Act appropriation and inclusion as a funded project in the State's Land Acquisitior
Trust Fund.
• Consolidation of the State's judicial circuits.
• Insurance affordability.
• Workforce housing(TDT flexibility for workforce housing).
• Funding for road elevation projects.
• Marine protections(mooring fields, derelict vessels and pump out program).
• Comprehensive plan and Rate of Growth Ordinance protections
4135
• Repeal of the local occupancy licensing preemption and clarifying language for Monroe's
• Repeal or exemption from vacation rental preemption.
Upon Board approval,the County's legislative team will pursue all of the legislative issues approved by the Board,
in close collaboration with our state legislators, Representative Jim Mooney and Senator Ana Maria Rodriguez.
Typically, through each session,the County's legislative team focuses on its priorities, and then works through the
Florida Association of Counties (FAC) and the Small County Coalition(SCC) in achieving broader legislative
issues. FAC and SCC will finalize their legislative programs during the FAC legislative conference in December.A
a member of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact,Monroe County works collaboratively to help
develop the Compact's annual legislative program. That agenda will come to the Board for approval before the star
of the session.
2024 Legislative Session Dates:
• October 18: Approval of BOCC Legislative Agenda
• October-December: Interim Committee Weeks
• November 2: Local Delegation Meeting
• November 15-17: FAC Legislative Conference
• January 9: First Day of Regular Session
• January 17: Florida Association of Counties Legislative Day
• February 22: Keys Day
• February 27: Last Day for Committee meetings
• March 8: Last Day of Regular Session
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
Approval of the 2023 State Legislative Agenda.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
DOCUMENTATION:
2024 Leg Priorities One Pager.pdf
2024 State Legislative Agenda(DRAFTl).pdf
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
4136
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THE FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
'
2024 STATE LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES '°
SUPPORT FLORIDA KEYS STEWARDSHIP ACT FUNDING
✓ Support $20M appropriation for the Florida Keys Stewardship Act to construct water quality projects to
improve/protect the quality of the Florida Keys'nearshore waters and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary,
and $5M appropriation within Florida Forever for land acquisition the Florida Keys.
✓ Support legislation to fund Florida Keys Stewardship Act from the State's Land Acquisition Trust Fund.
OPPOSE JUDICIAL CONSOLIDATION
✓ Oppose legislation that consolidates the State's judicial circuits, specifically the 16th and 11th circuits.
SUPPORT LOWER INSURANCE COSTS
✓ Support legislation to maintain Citizens'annual rate cap at so%, raise the Citizens'value cap of primary homes to
$i.SM, require only properties at flood risk to carry flood insurance, and allow that wind and flood policies not"be
identical"as they relate to contents coverage.
SUPPORT USE OF TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX FOR TOURISM WORKFORCE HOUSING
✓ Support legislation to expand the eligible uses for Tourist Development Tax-generated funds to include
affordable/workforce housing for tourism sectors workers.
SUPPORT MONROE COUNTY'S AFFORDABLE/WORKFORCE HOUSING LOCAL EFFORTS
✓ Support legislation to enable Land Authority to perform compliance with income qualification only at time of
purchase for home ownership projects using LA funds, to protect its funding for future qualified buyers via
recordable, perpetual deed restrictions,and to clarifythat its funding will not be subordinate to the primary lender
(but will be subordinate to other governmental program funding if those programs require it.)
✓ Support legislation that gives temporary flexibility to Monroe County's SHIP program regarding its income
distribution requirements to ensure we can use our full allocation.
✓ Support legislation to enable local governments to provide ad valorem property tax relief to owners of privately
owned rental properties that comply with affordability criteria.
SUPPORT MARINE PROTECTIONS AND APPROPRIATION
✓ Support legislative appropriation to support costs for development of mooring field shoreside facilities.
✓ Support changes to the State's Derelict Vessel Grant Program to improve removal timeframes.
✓ Support statutory language to define and classify"migrant vessel"to allow fortheir immediate removal.
✓ Support continued DEP funding and management of the County pump out program.
SUPPORT LOCAL OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
✓ Support legislation enabling the continuation of local licensing programs for small, specialty tradespeople and
contractors by repealing preemption, and clarifying Monroe's exemption (carve out) language.
RESILIENCE/FLOODING MITIGATION FUNDING
✓ Support Monroe's resilience projects submitted to DEP's Resilient Florida grant program and DEM's HMGP/FMA
programs for elevation/buyout/demo-rebuild,and reduction of the 5o%match requirementfor RF grant program.
ASCS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ROGO PROTECTION
✓ Support legislation that ensures that State affordable housing, land use or development-related incentives or
preemptions do not supersede Monroe's ASCS comprehensive plan and Rate of Growth Ordinance regulations.
OPPOSE VACATION RENTAL REGULATION PREEMPTION
✓ Support legislation to exempt ACSC from preemptive vacation rental regulations or legislation or allow local
governments to amend and update grandfathered regulations without losing grandfathered status.
Contact information: Roman Gastesi,County Administrator,305-292-4441,gastesi-roman@monroecounty-fl.gov
Lisa Tennyson,Dir.Legislative Affairs,305-292-4441,tennyson-lisa(a-),monroecounty-fl.gov 4137
r
III
m i
i
r '
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Office of Legislative Affairs
October 2023
4138
I oniroe County IBoai d of County oii'nii'n sss ones s State 11 egss�laflve Flii ioii ifleS 2021,.
Mayor Craig Cates, District i
Mayor Pro Tern Holly Merrill Raschein, District 5
Commissioner Michelle Lincoln, District 2
Commissioner Jim Scholl, District 3
Commissioner David Rice, District 4
County Administrator Roman Gastesi
House District z20: Representative Jim Mooney
Senate District 39: Senator Ana Maria Rodriguez
���� �I� �� ii �iw �i ���311�m �ii u�lli �� ����ii u��i������"��i
w
Florida Association of Counties
Small County Coalition
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
South Florida Regional Planning Association
National Association of Counties
Gulf States Counties and Parishes Caucus
F �
4139
INTRODUCTION REPORT AND DISCUSSION................................................................................... 3
STATE LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES:
Stewardship, LATF,Water Quality.......................................................................................... 6
LandAcquisition..................................................................................................................... 7
JudicialConsolidation ............................................................................................................. 8
Resilience................................................................................................................................ g
Windand Flood-Insurance....................................................................................................... 3.0
Workforce/Affordable Housing (including TDC and Land Authority requests).......................... ii
VacationRentals...................................................................................................................... 12
Comprehensive Plan/ROGO Protections.................................................................................. 3.3
Marine Protection (Derelict Vessels, Mooring Fields, Pump-out Program) ............................... 14
Occupational Licensing............................................................................................................. 3.7
Transportation.......................................................................................................................... 3.8
Preemption and Home Rule ............................................................................................. ig
GENERAL STATE LEGISLATIVE ISSUES:
Growth Management/Environment........................................................................................ 20
Emergency Management........................................................................................................ 20
Health, Mental Health,and Social Services.............................................................................. 21
Veterans.................................................................................................................................. 21
Clerks'Funding/Judgeships...................................................................................................... 22
Florida Retirement System....................................................................................................... 22
Libraries................................................................................................................................... 22
County Jails,Juvenile Justice..................................................................................................... 22
Homelessness ........................................................................................................................... 23
CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 24
Page 2
4140
Moniroe County Boan6mf County[mii,n �ss�o State 11 eg�|aflve FliiloiilfleS
LEGISLATIVE AGENDA DEVELOPMENT
Staff is seeking Board approval of the issues presented herein to be included in the Countv's 2024 State
Legislative Program. Upon Board approval, staff and the contract lobbying teams will pursue all the legislative
issues approved bythe Board,and in so doing, place appropriate priority on the issues thatthe Board directsto
receive a special level of attention inzoz4.
Annually,the Board reviews legislative priorities and gives direction on and approval of priority legislative issues
to guide the County's lobbying efforts at both the State and federal level. Typically, the County identifies as
priorities only its most pressing issues and then supports the Florida Association of Counties (FA[) and the
Small County Coalition (SCQ in achieving their broader substantive initiatives. As a member of the Southeast
Florida Regional Climate Compact, Monroe County collaborates on the Compact's annual legislative program.
Each year, the BO[[ and staff evaluate the trends and issues affecting all County programs and services to
identify potential policy orsubstantive legislative issues. Included herein are the substantive priorities and
general issues to be pursued and supported during the 2024 State Legislative session.
LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
The County's legislative efforts are incremental and focused on issues that are built upon throughout several
sessions, such as funding for water quality infrastructure and land acquisition and protecting Citizen's wind
insurance affordability; others are new, prompted by recent legislation or newly identified needs.The County's
priorities for the zoz4 session include:
* The County's number one priority is to secure a $25M appropriation as authorized by the Florida Keys
Stewardship Act, of which s20K4 is to fond water quality projects and s5K4 is for land acquisition. The
County utilizes its share of Stewardship funding forthe canal restoration program.
* An important additional goal isto have the Florida Keys Stewardship Act included as a funded projectin
State's Land Acquisition Trust Fund. The Land Acquisition Trust Fund (^LATF^) is funded with
documentary stamp taxes directed there by Amendment z. Projects currently funded in the LATFinclude
some of the State's highest environmental priorities, such as Everglades Restoration and springs
restoration. Inclusion of the Keys' Stewardship Act into the LATF would elevate our Stewardship Act to
Statewide importance and help secure annual funding.
* The Florida Keys Stewardship Act also authorizes an annual s5M set-aside of Florida Foreverfunding for
the next ten years, dedicated specifically to enable Florida Department of Environmental Protection to
renew an aggressive land acquisition program in the Florida Keys. As the universe of development permits
shrinks, and the County reaches"build out,"there is a need to keep our state legislators mindful about the
impacts and consequences ofMonroe County'scha||enge of protecting both environmentally sensitive
lands while balancing private property rights. The State of Florida, having designated the Florida Keys as
an Area of Critical State Concern, is a partner with Monroe County in this challenge and we continue to
work closely with the State's ACSC oversight agency,the Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO) on
these issues, and the State's main environmental regulatory agency, the Department ofEnvironmental
Preservation.
* Wind insurance affordability(and more recently flood insurance) is yet another perennial priority though
this year there is increased urgency. Most wind policies in Monroe are with state-backed Citizens Property
Insurance Company ("insurer of last resort.") Thanks to the spiraling property insurance crisis, Citizens'
policy numbers have soared past 1.4K4 because it is the default insurer for policy holders from the private
Page
4141
sector insurance companies that have failed or left the State. Lawmakers continue to pressure Citizens to
shed policies by forcing insureds into takeout companies with higher premiums,and by limiting eligibility.
Preserving affordable wind insurance requires regular advocacy with Citizens, legislators,and the Office of
Insurance Regulation to oppose efforts to increase premiums, eliminate the cap on annual increases,
reduce coverage, and reduce eligibility.
To make matters worse,recent state legislation now requires flood insurance to be carried by all Citizens'
policy holders—even for homes not at risk for flood. The cost for flood insurance is increasing because of
Risk Rating 2.0, FEMA's new pricing scheme for National Flood Insurance program policies. Risk Rating 2.0
also eliminates the Preferred Risk Policies that were once offered very inexpensively for homes not at risk
of flood.
Lawmakers having passed significant insurance legislation this past year are unlikely to revisit the issue in
any type of comprehensive way, nevertheless we will work with our delegation and with Monroe's
insurance advocacy group, FIRM,to press for some reforms that may help to reduce costs.
• A potential new legislative priority maybe the consolidation of the State's judicial circuits. Currently the
Florida Supreme Court is evaluating this issue and will make a formal recommendation to the Legislature
by December i. The Legislature may then choose to pursue legislation enacting those recommendations.
For Monroe, consolidation will mean joining its llth Circuit (the smallest circuit in the State) to Miami-
Dade's 11th Circuit(the largest in the State.)The County Commission has already expressed its opposition
tojudicial consolidation,and specificallyto the consolidation of Monroe and M iami-Dade's circuits,and we
will represent that opposition to any such legislation that is introduced.
• Anothertop priority is to continue to secure funding for road elevation projects from the State's Resilient
Florida Grant Program. Increasingly however, the program's So% match requirement will hamper our
efforts. The County's legislative team will advocate to lowerthe match requirement.
• Workforce housing remains an ongoing concern. Monroe has identified several additional legislative
measures that will help local efforts:
o Land Authority: The Monroe County Land Authority is authorized to utilize its funds to promote
affordable housing. To assist with new home ownership projects, it requires a statutory change
allowing it to qualify buyers only at the time of purchase for homeownership units, in addition to tools
to protect its funding and the future affordability of homeownership units that use its funds.
o Tourist Development Tax: Monroe seeks the ability to use a portion of the proceeds from TDT funds
for affordable/workforce housing for employees in tourism-related businesses. This is a potential
revenue source for workforce housing fortourism sectorworkers, but this use will require a statutory
change. Monroe County's tourism industry is a critical component of our economy, generating $1.913
in visitor-generated revenue. It also employs 20,000 jobs (4 out of every io workers in the County).
(Monroe County TDC, 2019).
o SHIP formula change: Monroe also requires greater flexibility in the use of SHIP funds. Currently we
are mandated to use 3o%of our SHIP allocation forvery low income(So%AMI)and 3o%for low income
(80%AMI). The remaining 40% may be used for moderate income (80% AMI.) The stark reality of
today's housing prices challenges ourabilityto qualifyfamilies in very low-and low-income categories.
If we cannot qualifyfamilies in those categories,then those SHIP funds go unutilized. Up to 6o%of our
SHIP allocation may have to be forfeited. Instead, Monroe seeks temporary (sunsets after S years)
flexibility that will enable usto use the funds across all categories(very low, low,and moderate without
specific category restrictions),enabling us to utilize ourfull allocation of SHIP funds to assist additional
families.
o Ad Valorem tax relief: To incentivize long-term rental housing over short-term/vacation rental, or
vacancy, we would seek authority to grant ad valorem tax relief to privately owned residential
properties that voluntarily rent affordably.
Page 1+
4142
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Coii,nii,nussuoneirs Mate Il....eg sllatuve I-Iii1oillfles 2021,.
• Building on the progress of the past few years, will continue seek State assistance to bring online new
mooring fields. Last year we secured an appropriation to design,engineer and implement 14o new moorings
in two mooring fields (in the Wisteria Island and Boca Chica areas.) This year we will request legislative
funding for the development of shore side facility for the Boca Chica mooring field.The new mooring fields
promise to help reduce vessel dereliction enhancing boater safety and resource protection. Additionally,
improvements are sought to the State's Derelict Vessel Grant Program. While the County appreciates the
State funding to help remove derelict vessels, it is essential that we find ways to reduce the program's
inordinately long removal processing times.
• On behalf of the County's hundreds of small contractors and tradespeople, Monroe will continue to pursue
the repeal of the local occupancy licensing preemption passed by the Legislature in 2021. In the 2023
session legislators delayed the implementation of the prohibition for one year,and carved Monroe out of the
preemption. This year we will seek clarifying language for Monroe's carve out. and work in tandem with
FAC to once again repeal or significantly amend the preemption. Local licensing programs help, not harm,
small contractors, and tradespeople,as well as protect consumers.
• Local government preemptions have proliferated over recent legislative sessions, such as those related to
vacation rentals, term limits for local elected officials, contractor licensing, home-based businesses, cruise
ship activity in local ports, single use plastic bags, business regulation, use of county rights of way, and local
referenda represent a significant challenge to home rule. We expect these State legislative efforts to
continue. Recent State legislation seeks to advance agricultural development and affordable housing
development via preemptions and incentives. Monroe County seeks to ensure that these types of legislative
efforts do not override our local comprehensive plan and Rate of Growth Ordinance regulations.
LOBBYING CONTRACTS
The County utilizes contract lobbying services at the State level to further Monroe County's legislative goals
and to secure vital appropriations. Monroe County currently contracts with Robert Reyes with Capital Group,
Frank Bernardino and Edgar Fernandez with Anfield Consulting, Dean Cannon, Ryan Matthews and Angela
Drzewiecki of Gray-Robinson, Nick larossi and Andrew Ketchal with Capital City Consulting and Noah
Valenstein with Brightwater Strategies Group. These firms provide a daily presence in Tallahassee and
advocate for the County's legislative priorities. Staff works closely with the County's State lobbying team
communicating frequently on session activities, legislation, State policy, regulatory, and budget issues. In
addition to weekly team conference calls during session, and weekly issues tracking, lobbyists also submit
monthly reports, and formally report annually to the Board of County Commissioners.
KEY DATES
2024 Legislative Session Dates:
• October 3.8:Approval of BOCC Legislative Agenda
• October-December: Interim Committee Weeks
• November 2: Local Delegation Meeting
• November IS-17: FAC Legislative Conference
• January g: First Day of Regular Session
• January IT Florida Association of Counties Legislative Day
• February 22: Keys Day
• February 27: Last Day for Committee meetings
• March 8: Last Day of Regular Session
Page 5
4143
FLORIDA KEYS STEWARDSHIP: WATER QUALITY PROTECTION
CHALLENGES:
➢ Unique Ecosystem:The Florida Keys lie within the waters of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.
This fragile and complex marine ecosystem of the Florida Keys is one of the unique ecosystems in the
world. It is home to the only living coral reef in the continental U.S.and the third largest barrier reef in the
world,the largest sea grass meadow in the hemisphere, and 6,000 species of marine life. Cesspits, runoff,
and degraded canal waters pollute the nearshores waters of the Sanctuary and threaten the ecosystem.
➢ Unrivaled Economic Impact: This ecosystem is the lifeblood of the Keys' marine-based tourism and
fisheries economy that is unrivaled in the State of Florida generating over $5.713 in economic activity,
enabling the Keys to generate over$257M in sales tax revenue forthe State.
➢ Federal State Water Quality Mandates: The implementation of Advanced Wastewater Treatment
standards, storm water management and canal water restoration in the Florida Keys are all pursuant to
and in furtherance of the Federal Water Quality Protection Program mandates that apply to all the waters
surrounding the Florida Keys. Congress created the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary in iggo, and
directed US EPA and the State to develop a Water Quality Protection Program to protect water quality.
➢ Wastewater Implementation: The State mandated that The Florida Keys Area of Critical Concern
construct a centralized wastewater treatment system in compliance with FS 383.and 403 across the span
of the ioo+ mile archipelago. This has cost the local governments of the Florida Keys $9ooM. The State
has invested $iooM in that system. These wastewater treatment system improvements have been
completed.
➢ Stewardship Act: In 2oi6 in recognition of the importance of preserving the quality of waters surrounding
the Keys, the National Marine Sanctuary, the coral reef, and the unique and marine ecosystem, the
Legislature enacted the Florida Keys Stewardship Act authorizing state funding for environmental water
quality restoration projects.To date,we have secured $9oM in State legislative appropriations.
➢ Canal Restoration Program:. Waterquality restoration in ourcanals is an important partof preserving our
marine ecosystem because stormwater runoff into canals, and poor water quality within canals leach into
the nearshore waters ofthe Sanctuary.Afterextensive environmental testing most canals in the Keys were
found to have poor or fair water quality. Monroe County's Canal Restoration Plan ranks 96 canals in
unincorporated Monroe County with poor or fair water quality ratings that do not meet minimum state
standards for water quality. In 2020, the State added Canal Restoration as a mandated component to
Monroe County's ACSC annual work plan. The cost of this work is in the hundreds of millions. State
Stewardship Act funding is critical to this effort.
➢ Recurring State Funding: Inclusion of the Stewardship Act into the State's Land Acquisition Trust Fund
and thereby securing annual, recurring Stewardship funding, would significantly enhance local water
quality restoration efforts.
➢ LOCAL PROGRESS AND COMMITMENT:
o Canals Restored:To date,the County has or is in the process of restoring 2S canals.
o County Funds: The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners expended $7M in local funds to
develop a Restoration Work Plan and to conduct a Restoration Pilot Program, wherein we
implemented different restoration technologies to determine the costs and benefits of each technique.
o RESTORE Act funds: Monroe has committed all its RESTORE Act$20M to Canal Restoration.
o Federal Funds: The County secured a $45M federal Natural Resources Conservation Service grant in
2o3.8 to remove hurricane-related debris from almost 200 canals.
Page 6
4144
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nissioneirs State Il....eg sllative I-Iii1oil hues 2021,.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT a $2oM appropriation forthe implementation of The Florida Keys Stewardship Act.
SUPPORT inclusion of the Florida Keys Stewardship Act in the State's Land and Water Trust Fund.
SUPPORT creation of a recurring five-year water-related work plan (like the FDOT five-year work plan
model) for the distribution of State funding for local water-related infrastructure projects and support
increased State funding for local water infrastructure projects.
FLORIDA KEYS STEWARDSHIP ACT: LAND ACQUISITION
CHALLENGES:
➢ Area of Critical State Concern: The State of Florida designated the Florida Keys an Area of Critical State
Concern, in recognition of its unique and significant environmental resources, and through the
Administration Commission, the State maintains oversight of the growth and development issues in the
Florida Keys.
➢ Hurricane Evacuation: State law limits residential housing growth in the Keys so that permanent
residents can be safely evacuated within 24 hours. U.S. i has limited capacity for cars on the road, which
limits the number of people that can live here. The State accomplishes this through an annual rationing of
building permits, until we reach a cap or"build out."
➢ Development Permits:The State caps the total number of new building permits in the Keys. In 2013 that
cap was set at 3,SSo. Each year,for the next ten years,the State allocates 3SS permits to the Keys.We will
reach build out in 2026, after which there will be no more permits, and no further development will be
permitted.
➢ Property Rights/Legal Liability: After we apply for all the available permits (3,SSo), there will still be
approximately 6,00o privately owned, undeveloped parcels, potentially with no ability to develop. The
deficit of permits could trigger property rights lawsuits against the local governments and the State from
owners who may have been denied the ability to build a home on their property. The total value of the
remaining 6,00o parcels,and the liability of potential takings claims, is conservatively estimated at $627M
(2022 data). The County and the State have been named as co-defendants in property rights suits filed
because of ACSC regulations,and jointly defended those suits.
➢ Conservation and Non-Conservation Lands: Florida Forever provides a programmatic funding source
through which the State can acquire lands to retire development rights, if those properties are
conservation lands within the Florida Forever project boundaries. Of the 6,00o privately-owned,
undeveloped properties that could be left without permits approximately 3600 lies within the Florida
Foreverproject boundaries. In 2o3.8,we secured legislative changes that authorize the State to acquire non-
conservation lands in ACSCto retire development rights. However,this type of acquisition requires a state
funding source.
➢ Military Base Buffering:The Keys are home to the U.S. Naval Air Station Key West.Approximately Soo of
the 6,00o privately-owned, undeveloped parcels lie within NASKW's military buffer areas. In 2o18, we
secured legislative changes that prioritized NASKW within the State's military buffer lands program, but
the program requires greater State funding to acquire more base buffer land.
➢ Voluntary Home Buyout Program: This is another program that assists in land acquisition. The State
program, run bythe Department of Economic Opportunity, is designed to help reduce the impact of future
disasters in high-risk flood areas. Monroe County was allocated s3.SM which it uses to purchase the
property and home of voluntary sellers who were impacted by Hurricane Irma. After buyout,the home is
demolished,the land preserved in perpetuity for open space (or,when deemed necessary the land may be
used for recreational or stormwater purposes),and the development rights are retired.
Page I
4145
LOCAL COMMITMENT: Since July 1, 2oi6, through August 31, 2023, Monroe County (the Board of County
Commissioners and the Land Authority) has expended a total of s30.8 M in local funds to reduce this liability
by acquiring land and retiring the development rights. The County has an additional sig.S M budgeted forfiscal
year 2024. DEP has expended s8.7 M and DEO has expended s8.3 M. During this period, 488 development
rights have been retired (332.6 by the County,i38.S by DEP, and 17 by DEO).
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT appropriation of$SM within Florida Forever as authorized in The Florida Keys Stewardship Act
for land acquisition within the Florida Keysthatwill both conserve environmentally sensitive land and retire
development rights to mitigate future takings liability.
SUPPORT continued partnership with FDEP and DEO to fund and implement an aggressive, long-term
land acquisition strategy aimed at reducing the total inventory of privately owned vacant land to curtail
the threat of significant future takings liability.
JUDICIAL CONSOLIDATION
CHALLENGE:
The Florida Supreme Court was requested by the Legislature to evaluate the merit/need to consolidate
Florida's judicial circuit courts based on criteria such as effectiveness, efficiency, access, and public trust. The
Supreme Court convened a statewide Judicial Assessment Committee to collect data,survey stakeholders hold
public hearings, and solicit public comment. The Supreme Court is charged with issuing its findings and
recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2023. The Legislature may then choose to act
legislatively on those recommendations during the 2024 session.
For Monroe County consolidation would mean joining its 3.6th Circuit (the smallest in the State) with Miami-
Dade's 11th Circuit(the State's largest circuit), likely resulting in less effectiveness,efficiency,access,and public
trust, for Monroe's residents, not more. This potential consolidation would be detrimental to Monroe for
several reasons:
o Monroe County's unique geography presents a significant accessibility to courts issue, as a long chain
of islands exceeding 3.20 miles in length,which is why the 3.6th Judicial Circuit has a Lower, Middle and
Upper Keys Courthouse to address and improve accessibility. Consolidation with Miami-Dade would
further burden Keys'citizens to have meaningful access to court and court services consistent with due
process afforded under our current system.
o Current robust local focus on the Keys'unique natural resource protection and coordination of efforts
between local law enforcement and State Attorney would likely not be prioritized in a circuit serving a
large, urbanized county where law enforcement, prosecutorial and judicial resources are focused on
other criminal activity.
o A less robustly protected environment and diminished enforcement of resource violations will
inevitably translate into economic losses.
o Voter registration numbers dispel any argument that Monroe voters will have a meaningful voice in
electing their State Attorney.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
OPPOSE legislative effort to consolidate judicial circuits, specifically the consolidation of the 3.6th and 11th
circuits.
Page 8
4146
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nussuoneirs State I1....eg sllatuve I-Iii1oillfles 2021,.
ENHANCING MONROE COUNTY'S FLOODING RESILIENCE
CHALLENGES:
➢ Severe and persistent road flooding is impacting many communities affecting public safety, commerce,
property values and quality of life.
➢ Estimated Costs: In 2oi8, Monroe County embarked on a comprehensive studyto examine the impacts of
sea level rise, King Tides, and storm inundation on the County's Road system. This study, completed in
2021, produced initial cost estimates of $1.813 to elevate roads and otherwise mitigate flooding
impacts. (This estimate does not include roadways within the Keys'municipalities.)
➢ The County is charting a course to pursue all available funding streams to assist with this comprehensive
effort, including federal and state grants, Congressional appropriations, special assessments, and local
funding.
➢ Resilient Florida Grant Program: The County has already secured significant funding thru the new
Resilient Florida ("RF") Grant Program, created by the Legislature in 2020 to allow local governments to
apply for grants to address resilience needs. However, the 5o% required match will limit the County's
ability to continue to secure funds through this program if we cannot also secure match sources.
➢ Federal Activity: Monroe County's residential communities and privately owned housing stock also
require resilience investment. In partnership with Monroe County,the Army Corp of Engineers conducted
a study of the Florida Keys and within unincorporated Monroe County alone there are over 3.,800
residential structures at risk for flooding and recommended for elevation. This $1.813 Florida Keys
Coastal Resilience program was Congressionally authorized in 2022. The authorization allows for future
Congressional appropriations to the Army Corp for flood mitigation to homes, businesses,and US i in the
Florida Keys. Monroe also secured a $5M federal appropriation for resilience.
➢ Hazard Mitigation Grant Program:Currently,the County is currently in the process of securing significant
funding through the federal-state Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP),a program that enables local
governments to facilitate rebuilding their communities to be flood resistant and eliminate flood risk.
Programs like this are vital to the changing climate and risks associated with flooding related to storms
and sea level rise;they also require significant staff expertise and time.
➢ In 2022, the County secured an expansion of powers and responsibilities of the Monroe County Land
Authority to enable it to assist the County in activities related to enhancing residential resiliency to
flooding and sea level rise, including seeking and administering grants to the County to
elevate/rebuild/buyoutflood-vulnerable homes.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT funding for projects submitted to DEP through the Resilient Florida grant program for road
elevation/flood mitigation projects.
SUPPORT continued robust State investment in local resilience efforts, including full funding for the
Statewide Resilient Florida Grant program.
SUPPORT an elimination or reduction in the match requirement.
SUPPORT funding for projects submitted to DEM through FEMA-funded HMGP and FMA grant programs
for residential home elevations, buyouts and demolition/rebuild.
Page g
4147
WIND INSURANCE AND FLOOD INSURANCE
CHALLENGES:
➢ Importance of wind insurance and Citizens Property Insurance Company ("Citizens"): Most wind
policies in Monroe are with state-backed Citizens,the"insurer of last resort." Preserving affordable wind
insurance requires working with Citizens, the Office of Insurance Regulation, and legislators to oppose
efforts to increase premiums, eliminate the cap on annual increases, reduce coverage, and reduce
eligibility.
➢ Current Property Insurance Crisis in Florida: Citizens is under increasing pressure, as the crisis in the
State's broader property insurance market grows worse. As the "insurer of last resort" Citizens continues
to have to pick up the policyholders from the private sector insurance companies that have dropped
policies,and in some cases gone insolvent, amid financial losses.After years of actively trying to reduce its
number of policies, Citizens'policies now exceed 1.4M. This is a significant concern, as is the rising cost of
property insurance in general.
➢ Wind insurance rates: Monroe's residential and commercial Citizens'wind insurance rates are the highest
in the State. Monroe's premium rate 175% higher than the median coastal rate. High costs and limited
coverage negatively affect our citizens, our workforce,our property values, and our economy.
➢ Monroe's building standards: Monroe County's building standards are among the most rigorous in the
State,yet this is not reflected in Citizens'rate calculations for Monroe.
➢ Premiums vs. Claims: Premiums charged by Citizens are not commensurate with actual risk.
o From 2004-present Monroe paid in total more than a half billion dollars in premiums over claims.
➢ Affordability and Annual Glide path: Monroe's already high rates are compounded with annual lo%
increases. These costs exacerbate the County's housing cost crisis. Property insurance affordability is a key
component in preserving the Keys' strong local economy. The legislature recognized the importance of
affordable property insurance, but Citizens has failed to apply an "affordability" definition or standard
(beyond capping annual increases to io%.)
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation statute reads: "The absence of affordable property insurance
threatens the public health,safety,and welfare and likewise threatens the economic health of the State.
The State therefore has a compelling public interest and a public purpose to assist in assuring that property in
the State is insured and that it is insured at affordable rates so as to facilitate the remediation, reconstruction,
and replacement of damaged or destroyed property in order to reduce or avoid the negative effects otherwise
resulting to the public health, safety, and welfare, to the economy of the State, and to the revenues of the
State and local governments which are needed to provide for the public welfare."
➢ During the 2021 Legislative session, lawmakers increased the annual rate cap in Citizens' premiums 1%
each year for the next 5 years. Citizens and lawmakers continue to discuss raising Citizens' rates and
eliminating the rate cap altogether.
➢ During the 2023 Special Session, the Legislature implemented new requirements for Citizens' policy
holders, namely that they carry flood insurance (even if they are not at risk of flood), and that the new
flood insurance policies be identical to their Citizens'policies. The State's new mandate compounds the
impacts of Risk Rating 2.o, FEMA's new pricing program that has vastly increased flood insurance
premiums. Citizens'insureds are now facing higher than ever wind AND flood insurance costs.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT legislation that restores the io% rate cap for Monroe County, recognizing Monroe's unique
housing affordability issues and strong building codes.
SUPPORT legislation that increases Citizens'coverage cap to $1.5M.
Page`.r..o
4148
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nussuoneirs State Il....eg sllatuve I-Iii1oillfles 2021,.
SUPPORT legislation that rolls back requirement for flood insurance for Citizens' insureds that are not in
the flood zone.
SUPPORT legislation that rolls back the requirement that Citizens insureds' policies be identical to flood
insurance policies(allow for lower or no contents coverage under flood insurance).
SUPPORT legislation to help lower premiums and annual rate increases by requiring Citizens to:
o Apply mitigation credits that account for Monroe's rigorous building standards.
o Apply an affordability definition or standard, per the statutory language mandating affordability.
OPPOSE legislation that limits the availability of Citizens'coverage (particularly in areas such as Monroe,
where there is no reasonable degree of competition for windstorm insurance.)
SUPPORTthe legislative efforts of Fair Insurance Rates for Monroe (FIRM) related to both wind and flood
insurance affordability and availability for Monroe County.
WORKFORCE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING
CHALLENGE: In the Florida Keys,our unique development restrictions, lack of available land,and the expense
of construction significantly add to the cost of workforce housing development.
Affordable housing is a complex issue that impacts most communities in the state of Florida. It is a particularly
acute challenge in Monroe County due to astronomical land values combined with land that is limited by
significant environmental protections and supply that is limited by our Rate of Growth Ordinance permit
restrictions. Rents and home prices have dramatically increased, making it increasingly more difficult for
employers to recruit and retain employees,especiallywithin the tourism industry's lower paying service sector.
Meeting the affordable housing challenge requires a myriad of local and state (and federal)funding sources,
incentives, and strategies. Locally, Monroe County and the Monroe County Land Authority provide
development incentives and funding to promote affordable housing. State funding is critical to local efforts.
Yet additional local revenue sources and/or greater flexibility with existing revenue sources continue to be
necessary. New strategies like providing local property tax relief for residential multifamily property-owners
that rent units affordably should be encouraged.
The State's Florida Housing Finance Corporation's awards of Tax Credits and SAIL funding,as well other State
funding and incentives for preserving and developing new workforce/affordable housing are critical to local
affordable housing development efforts. The County also receives approximately $800,000 per year in SHIP
funding,which we use to help income eligible families move into homeownership.
State policies that include creative strategies like steering affordable housing development to commercial
areas and robust state funding, as SB 3.02 does, are encouraging. Broader state policies that control property
insurance costs and limit the proliferation of short-term rentals would also be helpful.
Monroe has identified several additional measures that will help local efforts:
o Land Authority: The Monroe County Land Authority is authorized to utilize its funds to promote
affordable housing.To assist with new home ownership projects, it requires a statutory change allowing
itto qualify buyers only atthe time of purchase for homeownership units, in addition to tools to protect
its funding and the future affordability of homeownership units that use its funds.
o Tourist Development Tax: Monroe seeks the ability to use a portion of the proceeds from TDT funds
for affordable/workforce housing for employees in tourism-related businesses. This is a potential
revenue source for workforce housing for tourism sector workers, but this use will require a statutory
change. Monroe County currently levies a 4%(in addition to a i%Tourist Impact Tax). It is charged to
visitors for overnight accommodations in the Florida Keys(i.e.,why it's called a"bed tax".)The revenues
4149
from these funds are directed to the TDC for marketing and promotion of the Keys as a tourist
destination. TDT funds are also allowed to be used for capital projects and public facilities related to
tourism. Monroe County's tourism industry is a critical component of our economy,generating$1.913 in
visitor-generated revenue. It also employs 20,000 jobs (4 out of every io workers in the County).
(Monroe County TDC, 2019).
o SHIP formula change: Monroe also requires greater flexibility in the use of SHIP funds. Currently we
are mandated to use 3o%of our SHIP allocation forvery low income (So%AMI)and 3o%for low income
(8o% AMI). The remaining 40% may be used for moderate income (8o% AMI.) The stark reality of
today's housing prices challenges ourabilityto qualifyfamilies in very low-and low-income categories.
If we cannot qualify families in those categories,then those SHIP funds go unutilized. Up to 6o%of our
SHIP allocation may have to be forfeited. Instead, Monroe seeks temporary (sunsets after S years)
flexibility that will enable us to use the funds across all categories(very low, low,and moderate without
specific category restrictions), enabling us to utilize our full allocation of SHIP funds to assist additional
families.
o Ad Valorem tax relief: To incentivize long-term rental housing over short-term/vacation rental, or
vacancy, we would seek authority to grant ad valorem tax relief to privately owned residential
properties that voluntarily rent affordably.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT expansion of eligible uses of Tourist Development Tax to include workforce housing for
tourism-sector workers.
SUPPORT changes to the Monroe County Land Authority to enable it to perform compliance with
income qualification only at time of purchase for home ownership projects using LA funds,to protect
its funding for future qualified buyers via recordable, perpetual deed restrictions, and to clarify that its
funding will not be subordinate to the primary lender (but will subordinate to other governmental
program funding if those programs require it.)
SUPPORT legislation that would authorize local governments to adopt ordinances to grant ad valorem
tax relief to residential properties voluntarily used for the public purpose of providing
affordable/workforce rental housing.
SUPPORT legislation that allows flexibility in the mandated distribution of SHIP funds to ensure that
we can utilize the County's full allocation.
SUPPORT award of Tax Credits to Monroe County,and protection of the Florida Keys set-aside.
SUPPORT award of SAIL funding to Monroe County.
MONITOR state legislation related to affordable housing development to ensure that Monroe County's
comprehensive plan regulations, including our Rate of Growth Ordinance regulations are not
superseded.
VACATION RENTAL IMPACTS ON WORKFORCE HOUSING
CHALLENGE: Vacation rentals exacerbate Monroe County's affordable housing crisis by depleting the
County's already limited rental housing stock for its workforce and driving up rental prices.
In the Florida Keys residential development— both market rate and affordable — is severely restricted. With
only a single transportation egress,and to ensure a 24-hour evacuation time priorto a major storm event,the
number of building permits allowed for Monroe County is limited bythe State.
Paage`.1.2
4150
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nussuoneirs State Il....eg sllatuve IFliiloiilfles 2021,.
As we cannot build new housing units as needed, the proliferation of short-term vacation rentals has a
particularly severe impact.With each new vacation rental,we lose an existing, irreplaceable housing unitonce
available for long-term workforce rental housing.
To maintain ourworkforce,which is critical to our tourism-based local economy, Monroe County must be able
to protect its rental housing stock and limit its conversion/loss to vacation rentals.
Monroe County has some regulatory authority that has been "grandfathered", but it is not sufficient to
contain the conversion of housing units to short-term rentals.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT legislation that provides a "carve out"for Monroe County from preemptive vacation rental
regulations via the County's status as an Area of Critical State Concern to enable the County to
amend/update our vacation rental regulations to preserve/increase supply of workforce housing.
SUPPORT legislation that protects Monroe County's grandfathered vacation rental ordinance and that
would allow local governments with grandfathered ordinances to amend and update their regulations
without losing their grandfathered status.
SUPPORT legislation that enhances Monroe County's ability to enforce local vacation rental regulations,
including allowing for higher penalties for violations.
SUPPORT legislation that restores authority to local communities for the regulation of vacation rentals,
as necessary for quality of life, public safety and preservation of a traditional residential communities and
accessible and affordable permanent and long-term rental housing stock.
PROTECTING ROGO FROM LAND USE/ DEVELOPMENT PREEMPTIONS
Challenge: Recent State legislation seeks to advance agricultural development and affordable housing
development via preemptions and incentives. Monroe County seeks to ensure that these types of legislative
efforts do not override our local comprehensive plan and Rate of Growth Ordinance regulations.
Recent agriculture-related legislation preempts local governments from adopting any ordinance, regulation,
rule,or policyto prohibit, restrict, regulate,or otherwise limit an activity of a bona fide farm operation or limits
an agritourism activity on land classified as agricultural land where such activity is regulated through
implemented best management practices or interim measures developed by the Department of
Environmental Protection, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, or water management
districts as part of a statewide or regional program.
As such,this lawallows fora propertythat is classified as agricultural to be exempted from building regulations,
allowing forthe construction of structures/uses iftheyare non-residential,and further allowing forthe clearing
protected hammock;for example, erecting barns to be used as wedding venues.
Additionally, new State laws seek to aggressively incentivize the development of affordable housing. While
we support such efforts, it is critical that these efforts do not override local comprehensive plan regulations,
including specifically, Monroe's Rate of Growth Ordinance regulations.
REQUESTED ACTION:
SUPPORT legislation to exempt Areas of Critical State Concern from legislative development
preemptions, or to clarify that the use/structure on any private property is not exempt from state and
federal environmental regulations.
SUPPORT legislation that ensures that legislative efforts to incentivize the development of affordable
housing do not override Monroe County's ROGO ordinance requirements.
Page`.r..
4151
MARINE PROTECTION:
MOORING FIELD DEVELOPMENT, DERELICT VESSEL REMOVAL FUNDING, AND
PUMP-OUT PROGRAM
CHALLENGE: Balancing the preservation of our marine environment while supporting a robust boating
community.
The protection of our marine environment and water quality is of utmost importance to Monroe County. Our
marine environment is the lifeblood of our economy and a cultural touchstone. Monroe has a robust boating
community ranging from recreational boaters to commercial and charter fishing boats,to live-aboard boaters.
The high number of boaters that visit and live on our waters unfortunately generates undesirable impact.
Monroe County has the highest number of derelict vessels in the State.The Florida Legislature and the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) have recognized the proliferation of derelict vessels (DVs)
around the State, and the significant navigational safety and environmental impacts they pose. The costs of
their removal are an unnecessary financial burden fortaxpayers.
Monroe County supports regulations and services that mitigate vessel dereliction like anchoring limits and
mooring fields. Additionally, compliance with No Discharge Zone regulations requires continuous vigilance
along with the provision of a no-charge vessel pump out service.
s) Mooring Fields: Mooring fields are an important strategy for promoting responsible anchoring and
reducing dangerous and costly vessel dereliction. To facilitate and encourage responsible anchoring,
the County has embarked on the development of additional mooring fields.
Long-term anchorage contributes to vessel dereliction. Most derelict vessels result from having been
anchored out, sedentary, and neglected for extended periods. The vessel's physical condition degrades,
eventually becoming inoperable. Often,the vessel is abandoned.The vessels often become"at-risk,""pre-
derelict,"and/or eventually"derelict". Anchoring limits reduce the number of days that a vessel may be
anchored in one place without moving;they require the vessel to be moved,which requires that the vessel
be maintained in an operable condition, reducing its chances of becoming derelict.
About half of the long-term anchored vessels surrounding the waters of Key West are stored vessels, with
the other areas throughout Keys'waters also containing numerous stored vessels; these are the greatest
generator of derelict vessels. Stored vessel owners commonly choose to store their vessel at anchor as an
alternative to paying the high prices forshore side dockage;or,they have the intentto abandon the vessels
to avoid the costs associated with proper disposal.
In 2021, the Legislature recognized the issue of long-term storage, and enacted a new go-day anchoring
limit. It also required that Soo new public mooring balls be placed in the waters around the City of Key West
before the new limit can be enforced in Keys'waters. This requirement is difficult if not impossible to meet,
and therefore precludes the new law's use and benefit. In 2022,the requirement for Soo new moorings was
lowered to ioo new moorings.
With the completion of a comprehensive feasibility study and a$3..6M legislative appropriation,the County
has begun design, engineering, and implementation of a new ioo- mooring ball mooring field in the
Wisteria Island area and an additional 40-ball mooring field in the Boca Chica area.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
V SUPPORT legislative appropriation to enable development of mooring field shore side facilities,a state
requirement for mooring fields.
4152
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nussuoneirs Mate II....egJ sllatuve I-Iii1oillfles 2021,.
2) Costs of Derelict Vessel Removal: Monroe County has the highest number of derelict vessels in the
State. State funding assistance for DV removal costs is critical.
Monroe County has the highest number of derelict vessels in the State. Derelict vessels pose significant
navigational safety and environmental impacts. Prevention of derelict vessels and funding process for
expeditious removal of derelict vessels are significant needs.
The County's Marine Resources Office works cooperatively with FWC and other law enforcement partners
to remove derelict vessels.When all attempts to locate and hold the boat owner responsible fail,the vessel
is referred to the Marine Resources office for removal. Each year,the Marine Resources Office removes an
average of 65-85 derelict vessels utilizing pre-qualified marine contractors that competitively bid eachjob.
In the last five years, removal of these vessels represents more than $4.50,000 in annual expenses.
State Derelict Vessel Removal Grant Program (DVGP): State assistance with the costs of vessel removal
is critical to Monroe County. Priorto 2019,the State assisted with DV removal costs by distributing to each
individual county an annual allotment of statewide vessel registration, which worked well. In 203.9, the
Florida Legislature changed the process for DV removal funding to counties, by directing 30% of vessel
registration fees into a derelict vessel removal trust fund and authorizing FWC to administer a grant
program through which counties must first apply for and obtain approval to remove a DV before receiving
DV removal funding.
DVGP Challenges: The merits of the grant program are worthy, however the overly-bureaucratic process
negatively affects our DV removal operations by increasing the removal timeline by up to 6 months due to
the restrictive guidelines (cannot remove a vessel prior to the execution of a grant agreement), increases
our administrative costs to prepare,submit and administerthe numerous associated grant agreements(23
since program inception; hundreds of hours), and requires our staff to make subjective determinations
about which vessels may or may not cause additional harm while awaiting the life cycle of the grant
(especially problematic during hurricane season). Since the implementation of this law, Monroe County's
portion of the revenues has decreased by approximately$70,00o a year, while operational challenges have
increased.
County-funded vs DVGP grant-funded average DV removal time January 2021-August 2023:
Number of Vessels Removed Avera a Removal Time
County Funded 58 63 days
DV Grant Funded 1 3-44 1 3.63.days
These challenges have resulted in increased boating safety issues,unnecessary environmental impacts,and
additional removal costs for Monroe County. For example, a number of these vessels have gone missing,
relocated, or sunk while awaiting the grant approval timeline.
Furthermore, because these revenues are part of a statewide trust fund,the annual budgetary approval and
spending authority for funding distribution is determined bythe state legislature.As a result, FWC has been
challenged with inconsistent and/or significantly reduced spending authorization forthis program.
In addition, FWC has utilized these funds in response to hurricane-related derelict vessels rather than
distribution through the grant program.We do not believe the intent of this funding was to address natural
disaster response for derelict vessels. Both issues have created unpredictable and unreliable funding
availability for local governments to address this critical issue.
In response, Monroe has repeatedly requested that FWC consider rulemaking changesto its Derelict Vessel
Grant Program Guidelines to include the following recommendations:
Page'.n.."
4153
b) Authorize pre-award costs for removal operations.
c) Authorize pre-agreement cost reimbursement for vessels that become an `imminent threat to public
safety'in the time between application submittal and contract execution.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
N7" SUPPORT legislative changes in F.S. 823.11(4) to the Derelict Vessel Grant Program per the above
staff recommendations.
3) Environmental Impact of Migrant Vessels: Monroe County has the highest number of migrant vessel
landings in the State. State assistance with removal of migrant vessels has been critical.
Illegal migrants use unregistered, undocumented, and often rustic, homemade vessels to attempt to
illegally enter the United States through the waters surrounding Monroe County. Monroe County has the
highest number of migrant vessel landings in the State. These vessels pose significant navigational safety
and environmental impacts and are often filled with debris, human waste, and improper fuel/oil
containers. Streamlining the process for expeditious removal of migrant vessels is a significant need.
Before Mass Migration EO 23-03, the County's Marine Resources Office collaborated with FWC and law
enforcement partners to address migrant vessels. As these vessels legally qualify as vessels, law
enforcement partners adhered to the derelict vessel investigation process, including a mandatory 21-day
posting period under F.S. 70S.103(2)(b), before permitting Monroe County to take action on the subject
migrant vessel. These vessels, often homemade or aged, deteriorate rapidly and break down into
numerous small fragments, which swiftly disperse into the environment. Moreover, most of these vessels
contain multiple types of hazardous materials,such as fuel and oil,stored in leaking and unsafe containers.
In response, Monroe County is urging legislative amendments to F.S. 70S.3-03 that would provide a clear
definition and classification of migrant vessels, allowing fortheir immediate removal and destruction.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT legislative changes in F.S.705.103 perthe above staff recommendation.
4) Funding and Management of Monroe County Vessel Pump-out Program: The pristine waters of the
Florida Keys attract high numbers of boaters from all overthe State and country. These waters are within
the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and are designated as a No Discharge Zone (NDZ) by DEP and
the Sanctuary. In 203.3, Monroe County implemented a large-scale Mobile Vessel Pump-out Program to
assist boaters in complying with the NDZ. Monroe County is also launching implementation of a Marina
Pump-out Initiative to expand the number of available shoreside pump-out facilities throughout the Keys.
Monroe County requires occupied vessels to provide a "proof of pump-out" and provides a free weekly
mobile pump-out service. Combined, these measures have ensured nearly i00% compliance with NDZ
regulations.
To date, the Mobile Vessel Pump-out Program has performed 3.71,000 pump outs and has captured over
2.4 million gallons of vessel sewage.
Monroe County has traditionally supported this program through its Boater Improvement Funds, Clean
Vessel Act funding, and direct legislative appropriations. This funding makes it possible to provide the
pump-out service at no charge,which is highly effective at incentivizing boaters to pump-out and ensuring
water quality protection for public health and our marine environment.
In the 2023. session, the Legislature transferred the management and administration of the Pump-out
Program to DEP. In late 2022, contract and funding issues at DEP led to a return of the program to Monroe
Page .i.6
4154
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Cou iin,iussuoneirs State Il....eg sllatuve I-Iii1oillfles 2021,.
County for the duration of FY 2022. The Department of Environmental Protection and County staff have
collaborated closely to ensure program continuity, proper management, and oversight of the program
through these transitions.
Per Monroe's request last year, DEP included the funding, and program management, in its agency
legislative budget request. We anticipate this to continue.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT continued DEP funding for and continued management of the pump out program.
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING PREEMPTION
CHALLENGE: In 2021, the Legislature passed, and the Governor signed into law HB 735, enacting Chapter
2021-214, Laws of Florida preempting local governments' ability to issue new local contractors' licenses.
Current licenses expire on July 1, 2023, after which time only State-licensed general contractors and
homeowners will be able to obtain work permits. Without a local license, small specialty contractors may not
obtain work permits, preventing them from being able to perform work in theirtrade.
During the past session, in an effort led by Rep. Mooney, Monroe was successful in securing language that
exempts Monroe County from the preemption. Thanks to the efforts of Monroe, FAC and counties such as
Miami-Dade and Broward, the bill also postponed the implementation of the preemption for one year. This
coming session Monroe along with Miami-Dade, Broward and FAC will continue to press for a repeal or
significant rollback of the preemption Further, Monroe seeks amended language to clarify our exemption.
Monroe County has over Soo local contractors many of whom have spent years working only under their local
specialty license,who may no longer pull permits as they have been doing their entire careers. The loss of this
licensing threatenstheir livelihoods and businesses,and they are urging Monroe Countyto helpthem by asking
state lawmakers to repeal this law.
Local licenses enable local contractors the ability to pull permits and perform work without having to obtain a
state license that may require knowledge or skills that exceed the scope of specialty contractors. Some local
contractors have been unable to qualifytotestfora state specialty license because theirexperience is only local
and not under a licensed state contractor, even if that experience is several decades.
Local licenses provide small contractors with a valuable marketing tool because they serve as an official,
scrutinized demonstration of their backgrounds and qualifications, enabling them to differentiate themselves
from contractors without that vetted experience.
Local licensing benefits small contractors'abilityto be hired by licensed general contractors as sub-contractors.
Because general contractors are required to carry insurance for themselves and subs, they prefer to hire sub-
contractors that are already licensed and insured,to save them the cost of having to carry additional insurance.
Local licensing also exists to protect consumers by giving consumers a tool for differentiating between
contractors with experience and qualifications from those without and ensuring qualified workmanship by
contractors with sufficient insurance to protect homeowners and workers. Additionally, insured contractors
protect homeowners who often are not properly informed that they are at risk of liability for any harm that
befalls unlicensed, uninsured contractors working on their property.
Finally, the local licensing ensures compliance with federal regulations by requiring that contractors have
knowledge of unique local environmental regulations, like federal floodplain or Endangered Species Act
requirements. For example,fence installations in Key Deer habitat are a violation of federal law.An unlicensed
contractor may not be aware of such regulations banning fences. Violations of federal laws leave the
homeowner and the County liable.
Page 3..7
4155
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT legislation repealing Chapter 2021-23.4, Laws of Florida, including all the created or amended
statutory provisions presently in effect, such as s. 3.63.23.3., F.S.,to allow counties to retain the authority to
operate programs requiring the licensure, certification, or registration of local contractors, and other
occupations as determined by each county's governing body by ordinance or resolution.
SUPPORT clarifying the language that exempts Monroe County as an Area of Critical State Concern.
SUPPORT amending the law to remove the expiration date of local government occupational licensing
requirements and programs existing on or before the effective date of Chapter 2021-214, Laws of Florida,
to ensure the health, safety and welfare of county residents and businesses.
ROADS/TRANSPORTATION
CHALLENGE: The Florida Keys is dependent upon safe, resilient, sustainable, and efficient access and travel
along US i. Traffic congestion and safety issues along this singular highway that connects the 112-mile-long
chain of islands affects the health, safety, welfare, economic sustainability, and quality of life of residents,
businesses,and visitors.
In 2020, the Commission approved its U.S. i Transportation Master Plan (TMP) that provides a set of
recommendations and developed a ranked list of 36 Keys-wide projects (such as bus stops, intersection
improvements,turn lanes,signage,and increased publictransit)and transmitted that listto FDOTfor inclusion
in our work plan. A project of particular importance is the intersection of US i, near MM 3.o6, a significant and
costly project. Continued FDOT attention to these projects and inclusion of them in FDOT's five-year work
plan is a priority.
Monroe County is coordinating with FDOT to program $o.S6 million for design of six revetments along US i.
This funding is to meet the match requirement for federal funding secured through the Army Corps of
Engineers Keys Coastal Resilience Program.
Staff continues to collaborate with District 6 staff regarding the start of the PDE for the Card Sound Bridge
replacement. The County makes effective use of SCOP funds including the design forthe milling, resurfacing
and safety upgrades of Card Sound Road.
In a local effortto reduce congestion on US i,the County has embarked on a new countywide transit initiative.
Monroe also supports efforts to improve safety on our roads for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Drivers
distracted by their phones account for 34%of crashes in Florida (representing 86,76o crashes,732 deaths, and
SS,247 injuries)and the problem is only growing. In Florida, screen interaction time increased by S seconds per
hour from 2023.to 2022. This seemingly minor increase caused an estimated 3,Soo additional crashes which
cost an additional $84 million and many lives.
In Monroe County from 2020-2023,there were 3,633.crashes from distracted driving, including 3.7fatal crashes,
573.injury crashes and 2,911 property damage crashes.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT FDOT's inclusion of prioritized projects into Monroe County's work plan.
SUPPORT funding from FDOT and FDEP for the Florida Keys' Coastal Resilience Project to match the
funding provided by the US Army Corp of Engineers to stabilize six locations along US i identified as
vulnerable to surge and sea level rise.
Page .i.8
4156
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Counii,nussuoneirs State Il....eg sllatuve i-Iii uoillfles 2021,.
SUPPORT continuing enhanced State funding for the Small County Outreach Program (SCOP). This
funding is critical to Monroe County, which is a small county with major bridge and local road
responsibilities.
SUPPORT increased critical state funding forthe Small County Road Assistance program (SCRAP).
SUPPORT funding for all modes of the state and local transportation infrastructure network.
SUPPORT more robust laws addressing phone use during driving.
HOME RULE
CHALLENGE: The State Legislature frequently and consistently pursues local government preemption
legislation that violates local home rule powers. Home rule,conferred to Florida counties by Article Vlll,section
i(f)and i(g)of the Florida Constitution (3.968), and by section 12S.o3., Florida Statutes, is the principle that the
government closest to the people is the appropriate authority to serve the needs and requirements of the
community. The preservation of this concept is essential to the operation of county governments in Florida,
which allows counties to develop and implement county-based solutions to local problems.
Commonly recognized preemptions include vacation rentals, local occupational licensing, single-use plastic
bags, sunblock, home-based businesses, seaports/cruise ships, tree-trimming. But they also include a wider
range relating to agricultural, utilities infrastructure, environmental, fees/taxation, and land use.
Anticipated for 2024: Term limits for local elected officials. Legislation has been introduced to limit the
terms of county commissioners to 8 years,applying retroactively to terms that began November 8, 2022. The
Florida Association opposes this measure as an intrusion of home rule.
Unfunded Mandates: The State Legislature frequently passes legislation that compels local governments to
provide a service, program, or benefit without providing the appropriate funding. Local governments face the
burden of using local tax dollars to finance functions that they have little control over and compromising local
governments'abilityto provide services requested by our local communities.
Cost shifts: The State Legislature frequently passes legislation that passes along the costs or increases local
share requirements for services traditionally funded by the State, such as but not limited to County Health
Departments, Courts, Clerks'offices,Juvenile Justice,and mental health services.
Restrictions of County Revenue Sources: At the same time the State Legislation imposes more mandates
and costs, it often pursues legislation reducing, restricting, or eliminating sources of revenue for county
services,such asthe Local Business Tax,Communication Services Tax,impactfees,transportation concurrency
fees, State Park admission fees,and sales taxes.
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
OPPOSE legislation that would revise current law in a manner that reduces or eliminates current local
government-related revenues or preempts home rule authority.
OPPOSE legislation that limits the terms of local elected officials including county commissioners and
constitutional officers.
OPPOSE efforts to shift cost of services, implement unfunded mandates, reduce State funding for
infrastructure, programs and services, or other legislation that is costly and limits Monroe County's ability
to serve the needs of its citizens.
OPPOSE legislation that preempts the legislative and policy-making powers of counties used to regulate
land use and implement local zoning controls.
Paage`.i.g
4157
ENVIRONMENT
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT legislation and funding to support continued implementation of the Comprehensive
Everglades Restoration Plan.
SUPPORT legislation and funding that protects and preserves Florida's coral reef tract.
SUPPORT the continued designation of the Florida Keys as an Area of Critical State Concern.
OPPOSE legislation that prevents counties from having local environmental protection programs that are
stricter in nature than State or federal regulatory programs.
OPPOSE any legislation that restricts State, county, and city government purchases of conservation land,
and which would effectively eliminate land conservation efforts in the Florida Keys.
SUPPORT legislative effortsthat strengthen the existing roles and home rule powers of local governments
to implement comprehensive planning programs that guide future development and encourage the most
appropriate use of land and natural resources.
SUPPORT county home rule authority, and current statutory provisions, which allow counties to retain
their current transportation concurrency systems,and impact fees, as adopted by local ordinance.
SUPPORT the development and maintenance of dedicated funding of the Florida Forever Grant Program
and Florida Communities Trust that provide recreational opportunities for parks, open space, greenways
trails and conservation to help meet growth challenges and protect natural resources.
SUPPORT state legislation to prohibit new well stimulation activities, including hydraulic fracturing
(fracking).
OPPOSE efforts to increase offshore drilling activities.
SUPPORT streamlining the permitting and regulatory processes for solar product manufacturers,
installers,and consumers,and further supports reducing burdensome regulations that hinder solar market
penetration.
SUPPORT policies that provide appropriate resources and incentives to local governments to achieve
statewide recycling goals, and further supports comprehensive recycling initiatives that encourage
increased participation of the residential, commercial,and industrial sectors.
OPPOSE legislation that preempts local communities from banning single use plastic bags, particularly
coastal communities where plastic bags are not only an environmental pollutant but also pose a danger
to ocean and coastal wildlife.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT continued state funding for county EOCs to ensure each can meet the minimum structural
survivability and operational space criteria established by the state and federal government.
SUPPORT assistance for building/identifying an Out of County Shelter for residents of Monroe County in
cases of mandatory evacuation during storm-related events and other emergencies.
SUPPORT increased funding to county base grant funding.
Page �20
4158
Il oniroe County IBoaird of County Coin'iin'iussuoneirs State 11 egss�laflve FliiloiilfleS 2021,.
SUPPORT polices that bolster funding of the Emergency Management Preparation and Assistance Trust
Fund (EMPA), which is to serve as a funding source for State and local emergency management,
preparedness, communication, and training, and opposing legislative sweeps of these trust fund monies.
HEALTH, MENTAL HEALTH,
SOCIAL SERVICES, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT increased state general revenue funding for County Health Departments (CHDs), any State
reductions to the County Health Department Trust Funds.
SUPPORT policies that preserve and strengthen the ability of CHDs to provide primary care and direct
patient care services, particularly in communities without adequate substitutes or alternative providers
for these services and maintain a coordinated system of county health departments (CHDs) that is
centrally housed within the Department of Health (DOH).
SUPPORT increased funding for core and crisis mental health and substance abuse services.
SUPPORT efforts to increase supportive housing, employment, and education initiatives for people with
behavioral health issues and/or disabilities.
SUPPORT state funding forthe provision of Baker Act "uvi enile services and facilities in the communities in
which thejuvenile and his/her family lives.
SUPPORT funding forthe Florida Healthy Start and Healthy Families program.
SUPPORT increased state funding and policies that reduce food insecurity, to i) increase the health and
productivity of those currently without consistent access to healthy food, 2) consequently reduce the
demand for public health and human services, 3) improve the financial security of those in need.
SUPPORTthe continuation of a coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD)system,and appropriate
and dedicated State funding forthe TD program; protect the TD trust fund.
OPPOSE policies that further shift state Medicaid costs to counties, and the continued evaluation of the
county-state cost share arrangement.
SUPPORT State legislation drawing down federal funds made available to Florida under the PPACA to
expand health care coverage to certain individuals who earn up to 3.38 percent of the federal poverty level,
if such a program does notfurther shift Medicaid coststo counties.
SUPPORT policies that protect the ability of counties to provide coordinated, countywide systems of
emergency medical services, and not limit the ability of county EMS transportation providers to be
reimbursed for their services.
SUPPORT maintaining a countywide regulatory system for EMS through the current Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity(COPCN) process.
VETERANS
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT policies that allocate state funds to hire County Veterans Offices in counties to increase services
and federal benefits for Florida veterans.
Page 21
4159
CLERKS FUNDING/JUDGESHIPS
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT continued attention to the adequate funding for the functions of the clerks of court, including
an allocation process that results in a fair and sufficient distribution of court generated revenue.
OPPOSE the decertification of any Monroe County Court judgeships and any reductions to the local
judiciary.
OPPOSE consolidation ofjudicial circuits.
FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
OPPOSE any benefit changes that result in an increase in the FRS county and county employee
contribution rates.
SUPPORT requiring all legislation that potentially results in an increase in the FRS contribution rate orthe
closing of the traditional pension plan to new employees to be analyzed and evaluated to determine the
direct fiscal impact of proposed changes to all local and State government to be eligible for consideration.
LIBRARIES
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT recurring and non-recurring funding of State Aid to Public Libraries Grant Program, Library
Cooperative Grant Program, Public Library Construction Grant, and Career Online High School program.
COUNTY JAILS, INMATE MEDICAL COSTS, JUVENILE JUSTICE
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
SUPPORT policies that provide Medicaid eligibility for persons incarcerated in county jails while waiting
disposition of their cases and to ensure that existing Medicaid benefits are not terminated during
incarceration.
SUPPORT policies and initiatives which reduce juvenile detention through prevention, civil citation,
treatment, and rehabilitation services.
SUPPORT policies that ensure adequate safety supervision and facility maintenance atjuvenile residential
assessment centers and secure detention facilities.
SUPPORT state investments in juvenile facilities to improve the conditions of secure confinement for
detained youth without such costs being shifted to the counties.
OPPOSE sentencing of State inmates to county jails, but support counties' ability to contract with the
Department of Corrections for housing State inmates.
Page 22
4160
Moniroe County Boan6mf County[min,i �ss�o State 11 eg�|aflve FliiloiilfleS
HOMELESSNESS
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
*p SUPPORT legislation that creates a dedicated State funding source for homelessness programs and
services.
SUPPORT continued coordination with the State's homeless planning council, specifically as it
recommends policies in support of the Federal Strategic Plan to End Homelessness.
*p SUPPORT the development of policies that would allow local governments to work with the State and
federal government to serve target populations: the chronically homeless, Veterans and Families and
children,with particular emphasis on children aging out of the foster care system.
*p SUPPORT a process that vvoo|d waive the fees related to obtaining personal identification from the
State for persons identified ashomeless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page �23
4161
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Craig Cates, District s
BOCC1(@monroecounty.fl.Q0v 30S-292-3440
Mayor Pro Tern Holly Merrill Raschein, District 5
BOCCS(@ onrocounty.fl. 2v 30S-4S3-8787
Commissioner Michelle Lincoln, District 2
BOCC2(crymonroecounty- l.crov3oS-2g2-4512
Commissioner David Rice, District 4
BOCC4(@monroecounty.fl.pov3oS-289-6000
Commissioner Jim Scholl, District 3
BOCC3(@monroecounty.fl.Q0v 30S-292-3430
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Roman Gastesi
Gostesi-roman@monroecounty-fl.gov
Office:30S-292-4441
Cell:30S-394-1332
DIRECTOR OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
Lisa Tennyson
Tennyson-liso@monroecounty-fl.gov
Office:30S-292-4441
Cell:30S-So9-1709
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Bob Shillinger
Shillinger-bob@monroecounty-fl.gov
Office:30S-292-3470
Cell:30S-747-4717
LOBBYISTS
Capitol Group: Robert Reyes,Tallahassee, FI 8So-42S-40So
Anfield Consulting: Frank Bernardino,Tallahassee, FI 866-96o-S939
Gray-Robinson: Dean Cannon, Ryan Matthews,Angela Drzewiecki, Tallahassee, FI 850-577-9090
Capital City Consulting: Nick larossi, Andrew Ketchal,Tallahassee FI 8So-222-9075
Brightwater Strategies: Noah Valenstein,Tallahassee, FI 8So-S28-o661
Page 21+
4162