Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item P1
PI BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY of MONROE �� i Mayor Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5 The Florida Keys Mayor Pro Tern James K.Scholl,District 3 Craig Cates,District 1 Michelle Lincoln,District 2 ' David Rice,District 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 13, 2023 Agenda Item Number: P1 2023-1570 BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning & Environmental Resources TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a Resolution Transmitting to the State Land Planning Agency an Ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium("RM") to Mixed Use/Commercial("MC") for property located at 103925, 103935, 103945, 103955, 103965 Overseas Highway, Key Largo, Monroe County, Florida, as proposed by Abit Holdings, LLC (Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department File No. 2019-029). ITEM BACKGROUND: The Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department("Department")received an amended application on May 30, 2023, from David Thompson on behalf of Abit Holdings, LLC (the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") designation from Residential Medium("RM") to Mixed Use/Commercial("MC") for five(5)platted lots on U.S. Highway 1, situated at approximate mile marker 104 in Key Largo. The property is legally described as Block 7, Lots 9-13, Largo Sound Village. The Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use District(Zoning) map amendment for the subject property from Improved Subdivision ("IS") to Suburban Commercial ("SC"). The subject of this agenda item is transmittal of the proposed FL UM amendment to State Land Planning Agency for state review. Site Information: Location: MM 104, Key Largo Address: 103295, 103935, 103945, 103955, 103965 Overseas Highway Description: Block 7, Lots 9-13, Largo Sound Village (Plat Book 4, Page 92) Current Property Identification Nos.: 00475240-000000; 00475250-000000; 00475260-000000, 00475270-000000 and 00475280-000000 Owner/Applicant: Abit Holdings, LLC 3511 Size of Property: 31,115.9 SF (0.741 acres)per survey by Lincoln Iturrey, P.A., Professional Land Surveyors and Mappers, dated 7/24/13. FLUM Designation: Residential Medium ("RM");pending application to amend to Mixed Use/ Commercial("MC") Land Use District: Improved Subdivision("IS");pending application to amend to Suburban Commercial("SC") Tier Designation: III Flood Zone: X CBRS: No Existing Use: Vacant Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Undeveloped Land Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include vacant land and residential uses to the east and south; commercial uses to the north and west (across US 1). The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed FLUM amendment is: "To allow for various types of residential and non-residential uses, excluding industrial and similar uses". The Applicant's full explanation and justification of the proposed amendment is included in the file for the application (Department File No. 2019-029) Concurrent Applications Department File No. 2019-028: A corresponding Land Use District ("LUD") Map amendment for the Property, requesting to amend the LUD from Improved Subdivision("IS") to Suburban Commercial ("Su). Community Meeting and Public Participation In accordance with Monroe County Land Development Code ("LDC") Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on August 26, 2019, to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") amendment and corresponding Land Use District("Zoning") Map amendment and to provide for public participation. There were approximately thirty-seven (37)people in attendance who provided feedback on the item. Issues identified included: limiting the development to high-end single- family residences, concern regarding increased density and affordable housing. Development Review Committee and Public Input The Monroe County Development Review Committee ("DRC") considered the proposed amendment at a regular meeting on November 18, 2019, and received public input. On November 21, 2019, the DRC chair signed Resolution Nos. DRC 13-19 and DRC 14-19, recommending APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the Land Use District ("LUD") Map and Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") to the Monreo County Planning Commission and Monroe County Board of County Commissioners 3512 Planning Commission and Public Input On November 19, 2019, the Planning Commission("PC")) considered the proposed FLUM amendment, provided for public comment and recommended denial through PC Resolution No. P52-19. The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department professional staff had recommended its own respective recommendation for the Planning Commission to approve this proposed FLUM change, as it was consistent with the Goals Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, did not adversely impact concurrency standards,provided nonresidential uses and affordable housing uses and density. The Planning Commission's denial recommendation under PC Reso. No. P52-19 stated the following: (1) the proposed FLUM is anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the surrounding area and(2) the proposed amendment may result in an adverse change in community character in the subarea an adverse impact. Amendment Review Maximum Density and Intensity by Land Use District The table included in the Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department professional staff report provides a comparison of the development potential for residential, transient and commercial development of the existing FLUM and Land Use ("Zoning") District as compared to the proposed, amended FLUM and Zoning District. As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in a decrease of 2.86 units in permanent allocated residential development potential; an increase of 3.42 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs (note: this remains less than the allocated development potential for market rate permanent units under the current FLUM); an increase of 10.29 units in affordable residential development potential; an increase of 17 rooms or spaces for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development potential of 14,001 square feet. The County has adopted Policy 101.5.26 (the discouragement policy)which requires increases in allocated residential density to be offset with the dedication of land. This amendment does not trigger this requirement as the allocated density is decreasing. The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department maintains its recommendation to the BOCC that the BOCC should approve this proposed FLUM amendment, based on the Department professional staff's findings, determinations, and conclusions that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan. Regarding community character, the Property is located across U.S. Highway 1 from several commercial uses including but not limited to: The Marina Club (Boat Storage), Sundowners (Restaurant), Jimmy Johnson's Big Chill (Hotel& Restaurant) and the Caribbean Club (Bar). The properties immediately north of the Property, adjacent to U.S. Highway 1, is Gus's Toy Box (Boat Sales). The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department's professional staff does not project or otherwise anticipate that the proposed FLUM will adversely impact the surrounding area's community character, as properties along U.S. Highway 1 in this location clearly already include both commercial and residential uses. It should be noted, while this amendment provides an increase of 3.42 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units, this can only be utilized with the transfer of TDRs (transferring and retiring density from a sender site so there is no net increase in density). Further, it should be noted, while this amendment provides an increase of 10.29 units in affordable 3513 residential development potential, the County's pool of available affordable allocations may be depleted by the time this applicant submits a development proposal. If the affordable housing allocation pool is depleted, the applicant will need to limit its development proposal request to nonresidential uses within the Suburban Commercial("SC") zoning district and/or propose to transfer ROGO exemptions to enable any proposed affordable residential development. As a potential third option,pursuant to Policy 101.3.10, the applicant may coordinate and request to transfer affordable allocations from a municipality to the County through an interlocal agreement. As before, the Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department's professional staff is recommending approval of this proposed FLUM change, as it is consistent with the Goals Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, does not adversely impact concurrency standards, and provides alternative nonresidential uses and affordable housing uses and density. It should be noted that the proposed corresponding land use ("zoning") district amendment would also alter the as-of-right and conditional uses permitted on the subject property. A comparison table of as-of- right uses and conditional uses for the Improved Subdivision ("IS") and Suburban Commercial ("SC") land use districts is provided as an attachment. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.5.26 The proposed FLUM amendment from RM to MC does not result in an increase to residential allocated density and therefore eliminates the need to mitigate under Policy 101.5.26. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area 1. Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land 2. Existing Tier Designation: III 3. Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened Species: 0 4. Existing Use: Office 5. Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include vacant land and residential uses to the east and south; commercial uses to the north and west(across U.S. Highway 1). The Property is located across U.S. Highway 1 ftom several commercial uses including The Marina Club (Boat Storage), Sundowners (Restaurant), Jimmy Johnson's Big Chill(Hotel and Restaurant) and the Caribbean Club (Bar). The parcels immediately north of the Property, adjacent to U.S. Highway 1, is Gus's Toy Box (Boat Sales). The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the surrounding area of parcels along U.S. Highway 1 is predominately commercial. Concurrency Analysis (Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.1.1) Monroe County shall ensure that all development and redevelopment taking place within its boundaries does not result in a reduction of the level-of-service requirements established and adopted by this comprehensive plan. Further, Monroe County shall ensure that comprehensive plan amendments include an analysis of the availability of facilities and services or demonstrate that the adopted levels of service can be reasonably met. Traffic Circulation(Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.2� The subject property is located at the intersection of U.S. Highway 1 and B Avenue in Key Largo at 3514 approximate mile marker 105. The property is accessible by via U.S. Highway 1 and B Avenue. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, the level of service standard for U.S. Highway 1 is LOS of"C." According to the 2021 U.S. 1 Arterial Travel Time and Delay Study("ATTDS"), U.S. 1 overall is operating at a LOS of"C" and Segment 23 on Key Largo (MM 99.5 to MM 106) is operating at a LOS of"A." A Level 1 traffic impact study was submitted by the Applicant. At the time of development approval, a trip generation analysis will be required to be submitted in order to verify sufficient roadway capacity. According to the 2021 U.S. 1 ATTDS, the maximum reserve volume for Segment 23 is 11,148 trips. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the Traffic Circulation LOS. Potable Water(Comprehensive Plan Policy 701.1.1A Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's water treatment facility in Florida City has a maximum water treatment design capacity of 29.8 million gallons per day("MGD") and is capable of treating up to 23.8 MGD. The annual average daily demand in Monroe County is 17.79 MGD. The proposed FLUM amendment would decrease permanent allocated residential density beyond what is already permitted and could result in a net decrease in demand from this site. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Potable Water LOS. Solid Waste(Comprehensive Plan Policy 801.1.1) Monroe County has a contract with Waste Management authorizing the use of in-state facilities through September 30, 2024; thereby,providing the County with approximately five(5) more years of guaranteed capacity for solid waste. Currently, there is adequate capacity for solid waste generation. All commercial solid waste is handled by private contract. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Solid Waste LOS. Sanitary Sewer(Comprehensive Plan Policy 901.1.1 The County has adopted water quality treatment standards for wastewater facilities and within the Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Master Plan, Exhibit 3-8, has stated the LOS standard for residential and nonresidential flow is 145 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit(EDU). The proposed FLUM amendment would increase the maximum net density on the site to 10.29 dwelling units, which would increase the required flow by 767 gallons per day. Any proposed development on the site will either need to connect to the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant system, or provide on-site sewage treatment and disposal that meets the LOS standards in Policy 901.1.1. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Sanitary Sewer LOS. CONSISTENCY WITH THE MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE KEY LARGO LIVABLE COMMUNIKEYS PLAN, THE PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT,AND THE MONROE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Please see the attached professional Staff Report for specific Goals, Objectives, and Policies. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Plan. 3515 Please see the attached professional Staff Report for specific Action Items. 3. Pursuant to Section 380.0552(7) Florida Statutes, the proposed amendment is not inconsistent with the Principles for Guiding Development as a whole and is not inconsistent with any Principle. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Please see the attached professional Staff Report for specific statutes. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: The property currently has a Land Use District ("Zoning") designation of Improved Subdivision ("IS") and a Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") designation of Residential Medium ("RM"). The Property was within the BU-1 district (light business district)prior to September 15, 1986. From 1986 to 1992, the Property was within the Suburban Residential(SR) zoning district. In 1992, the Property was designated as Improved Subdivision ("IS") zoning district. With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan's FLUM in 1997, the property was given the current FLUM designation of Residential Medium (VI MVI). INSURANCE REQUIRED: No CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department professional staff recommend approval of this proposed Future Land Use Map ("FLUM")Amendment. DOCUMENTATION: Abit_Holdings_FLUM_IIA 17.pdf 2019-029 DRC Reso 13-19.PDF 2019-029 PC Reso P52-19.PDF Zoning District_comparison.docx Exhibit 1 to Ord -Abit_Holdings_KL_FLUM—Ordinance Map.pdf 2019-029 BOCC SR 12.13.23.doc Ex.A to Reso FLUM Ordinance.docx 2019-029_Transmittal_Reso (1).pdf FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A 3516 / r ' /�/i r/� � P� i r��nl'li � �� 7 col �� b rJ� �c✓�,w 1� r r GU "all R NINNY !n U � N V y o cl o N q a ®oo®000�oo® c E a m cu o — o 1, 00 08.8. �,I /�/ I/ir/i � %/i%/i f i�>/,r •Fcr /e r I �� 1 'rii � > � � .. � o o o u o-o o E Y rood '° ✓ '/ wr ✓/ n/`�Ur/ sir lhl� ar ��� m m o o00 Na 1 l i1, �✓i �° ! f / /r ((f r� /iJ r 1 3 of I k 4 7 8 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE 10 RESOLUTION NO. DRC 13-1 11 12 1.3 A RESOLUTION BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE 1.4 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE 15 COUNTY OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Eli :I THE 16 MONROE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL 17 MEDIUM( )TO MIXEDUSE/COMMERCIAL(MU),FOR PROPERTY 18 LOCATED AT 103965, 103955, 103945, 103935 AND 10 925 OVERSEAS 1.9 HIGHWAY, KEY LARGO, APPROXIMATELY MILE MARKER 103.9, 20 WITH REAL ESTATE NUMBERS 00475240-0 0 0; 0 475250-00000 21 0047526 -000000; 00475270-000000 AND 00475280-000000 AS PROPOSED 22 BY ISLAND CONSTRUCTION ANA E EI T ON BEHALF OF A IT 3 HOLDINGS,I.LC", PROVIDING FOR SE" E A. 'ILITY; PROVIDING FOR 24 REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR 25 TRANSMITTAL TO THE. STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY C'Y' AND THE 26 SECRETARY OF STAPLE, PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE 27 MONROE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR AMENDMENT 28 TO THE FUTURE LAND USE AP; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 29 DATE. (FILE 201.9-029) 30 3132 3,3 34 WHEREAS, on February 21, 2019, the Planning and Environmental Resources 35 Department received an application from the Island Construction Management on behalf of Abit 36 Moldings, LLC (the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FL UM) 37 from Residential Medium (RM) to fixed Use / Commercial (MC) for 103965, 103955, :103945, 38 103935 and 103925 Overseas Highway, Rey Largo; and 39 40 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Development Review Con i-nittee (DRC) considered the 41 proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 18, 2019; and 42 43 WHEREAS, based upon the information and documentation submitted, the Development 44 Review Committee Chair found: 45 1. The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character 46 of the surrounding area; Resolution #DRC 13-19 Page I of File#2019-029 3518 1 2. The proposed FLU M is not anticipated to adversely impact the Comprehensive Plan 2 adopted Level of Service (LOS); 3 3, The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the 4 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and 5 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development 6 for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern, Sec. 380.0552(7), F.S.; 7 5. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part 11 of Chapter .163, Florida Statute; and 8 6. The proposed amendment will not result in an adverse change in community character 9 to the sub-area which a proposed amendment affects or to any area in accordance with 10 the Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys master plan pursuant to, findings of the BOCC. 1.1 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 13 COMMITTEE OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA that the information provided in the staff 14 report and discussed at the November 18, 2019 meeting supports, the Chair's decision to 15 recommend approval to the Planning Commission and Board of County Cominissioners. 16 17 Date 4,)/ZZq is Emily Schemper, ATCP, 19 Senior Director of Planning & Environmental Resources 20 21 1 HER CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid 22 and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Emily Schemper, to 23 me known to be the pet-son described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and she 24 acknowledged before me that she executed the same. 25 26 27 WITNESS my hand and official sea] in the County and State last aforesaid this day of 28 /V d V'(Y-Y) 2019. 29 30 31 NOTXRY PUI�OC, STATE OF FLORIDA 043704 2020 Resolution #DRC 13-19 Page 2 of 2 File#2019-029 3519 1. 3 P 4 ,, 7 8 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. P°52-19 10 11 12 A RESOLUTIONBY THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1.3 RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE E THE MONROE 1.4 COUNTY r F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENDI G THE 15 MONROE COUNTY T 1TURE LAND USE MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL 16 MEDIUM (ISM) TO MIXED USE / COMMERCIAL C:IA L (MU), FOR 17 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 103965, 1103955, 103945, 103935 AND 103925 1.S OVERSEAS ICE - A , KEY LARGO, APPROXIMATELY MILE 19 MARKER 103.9, WITH REAL ESTATE NUMBERS 00 75240-00 00; 20 00475 50-'00 000; 00475260-000000; 00475270-000000 AND 004752 0- 21 000000; AS, PROPOSED POSED BY ISLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I 22 ON BEHALF OF ABIT HOLDINGS, LLC,; PROVIDING FOR 23 SE E III.LIT ; PROVIDING FOR E EAL OF CONFLICTING 24 PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE 25 LAND PLANNING G CS C AND THE E SECRETARY:ETA F STATE; 26 PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION LUSIO IN THE MONROE COUNTY 27 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR END E T TO THE FUTURE RE 28 LAND USE P; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (FILE 201.9® 29 29) 30 31 32 33 34 WHEREAS, on February 21, 2019, the planning and Environmental Resources 35 Department received an application from the Island Construction Management on behalf of Abit 36 holdings„ LLB' (the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLL.M) 37 from Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use / C"on�rnercial (14°.C) for 103965, 1.03955, 10�3945, 38 103935 and 103925 Overseas Highway, Ivey Largo (the "property's); and 39 40 WHEREAS, the Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use (Zoning) 41 District map amendment for the subject property from Improved Subdivision (IS) to Suburban 42 Commercial (SC); and 43 44 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Development. Review Committee (DRC) considered. 45 the proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 18, 2019; and 46 Resolution p52-19 page 1 of 3 File 201 -029 3520 I WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 19, 2019, the Monroe 2 County Planning Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of considering the proposed 3 as ender to the Future Land Use Map of the Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan 4 and the proposed Zoning map amendment for the Property, and provided for public comment; 5 and 6 7 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission considered the application, the 8 staff report, and the comments from the public in their discussion; 9 to WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was presented with the following documents and 11 other information relevant to the request, which by reference is hereby incorporated as part of the 12 record of said hearing: 13 14 1. Staff report dated November 8, 2019 prepared by Cheryl Cioffari, AlCP, Assistant 15 Director of Planning; 16 1 Sworn testimony of Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources 17 Department staff; and 18 3, Advice and counsel of Steve Williams, Assistant County Attorney, and John Wolfe, 1.9 Planning Commission Counsel, 20 21 WHEREAS, based upon the information and documentation submitted, the Planning 22 Commission found: 23 1. The proposed FLUM is anticipated to adversely impact the community character of 24 the surrounding area; 25 2. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Comprehensive Plan 26 adopted Level of Service (LOS); 27 1 The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the 28 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and 29 4„ The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development, 30 for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern, Sec. 380.0552(7), RS.; 31, 5. The proposed arnendn-ient is consistent with Part 11 of Chapter 163, Florida Statute; 32 and 33 6. The proposed amendment will result in an .adverse change in community character to 34 the sub-area which a proposed amendment affects or to any area in accordance with 35 the Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys master plan pursuant to findings of the BOCC, 36 37 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 38 MCA OE COUNTY, FLORIDA hereby recommends denial to the Board of County 39 Commissioners of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map designation from 40 Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use / Commercial (MC) for property located at 103965, 41 103955, 1039,45, 1.03935 and 103925 Overseas Highway, Key Largo. 42 43 44 45 Resolution #P52-19 Page 2 of 3 File #2019-029 3521 I PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION of Monroe County, 2 Florida, at a regular meeting held on the 19 day of November, 2019. 3 4 Denise Werling, Chair YES 5 William Wiatt, Commissioner YES 6 Tom Coward, Commissioner YES 7 Joe Scarpelli, Comi-nissioner NO 8 Ron Miller, Commissioner YES 9 10 1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION F MONROE COjjNTY, FLORIDA 12 13 B y= 14 Denise Werling, Chair 15 16 Signed this day of 2019 17 18 19 NOT RY Pt�� 20 JLIC,, STATE OF FLORIDA 21 Monroe County Planning Can Attorney 22 A rproved As, To Form ILZEAGUILA My COMMISSGOM#GG 043704 23 EXPIRES:October 31 2020 24 Bonded'Mtu No Pubk Undemlftfs 25 10 h 1( 26 Date: 27 Resolution #P52-19 Page 3 of 3 File #2019-029 3522 M N LO M E a ° to Ln oEc m ~ nZtz . a)ai v o o � Eai� cU a1 ai v v on co .� m .-i N c U -o co o ^ p �o •° � No v LL O o a '2 U O � O _ C hp u . C C — M ,��,, O C O i C hp C a n7 i ' N 'c n7 ow jCij CL •-' 'O o V; C o o v o bo ° o a N . O aJ O > C aJ O ..M in V ° :3 >' , Xia aJ E co v i C o aJ C 'p C U 00 (o (o U (0 ate+ p U U co i >. 'O 'O n7 hp muU N o 0 E ,i- M X'X .0 pp hp Vi a.� mVjo Q aJ U ai C al o by yj O ut C co ,j,,, Vi C >. O aJ N N w O _ N N j ut O -O 'C,., a - C O co aJ N N 'O N Q 0 i C e-j aJ C C O 0Q m O hA ..J � C co O w 'n N = m u C > C N p C C aJ C .-i C co .0 > hp o 'O u cop u - C o O Vi O 0 t o o aJ C hA v O N C j�ij a ,m coo v aJ N , •U OO E � N � j _ O 'O v u o •c E X E . v o N .� C o jn in o aJ E •o u C o c E m `o o v '� X N C p m o v f0 v v v -o � m v, v ,� to u m � m N ° u ° c p v o E C v o oo o o OJ m N a a v u `o � N —m N ° N -p aJ C 'm o 'm 'm ° v o ° 'm o c ° c 3 ao `m oo v c '� ° c '� 'm c bon .0 op o E > v m o o E 3 o ° m c o _ c c v v ai fl 3 v a v v op o o c m N o o y o u u _ 0 v c E m E E c ° E m +J _ C •(o +J '': aJ co C — ,jam,, a (o aJ m in a E .N 'N E o 3 c c v -m E ° u u o o v v m bn C m ° c c ° c� o v s v a a Q m u Q n n Q •N a u ai u mH � H = N > — o O .-+ -o N m m to o C ° U s +� U U 0 U � N i Vf N N > p o p N > U Vj o .Q CL > .Q cc O. LA E a v ° m o U co c m s c U 3 v 3 n o E m o 1 75 U U C 00 U >✓ N N N a.� 00 aJ ut N O' O CL 0 aj O E O O. o0 Vt o ^ v v u -p v o p -° ut -O C aJ .j'5 o O a.� ut � 3 C E ° —m ° U 72 C o ° v v > v m v v O C m 9- 'O O. hp ut ut v O. .5 O. •o v > 3 v c n E c o o of o 0 N `m N — p o o m 0 o c v c u 05 a _ fl c Vim, v E s fl. oop o v m co o V, c N o > N .. o V v m v v m ai o C zl� ° :° E � on C U fl °A 0 m v 3 a 0 v fl c E u a m E _ p � U C •` v u p co C Vj U 0 (o Vj 0 v 3 � E o v a`"i O m �n v °; 3 o n v v E cn o C 0 -o o - u aXi V, o = o °; C =o o `o v .° o o m E - v > m a' u c > o0n o > o -" c v v ° v ° m o u o o m o m n C o C v o > m moo = ateoN � � aj a uam O. 'p m U U aJ aJ .Q m 'O 'O U U C u hp E m �-o � .E � .E o O C m °° ° ° ax o v m u v0i i+ Y 00 � L O � by Q CV= `~ _ o � Naj Q LL le N LO Cl) O to aJ Oj. N N d aJ E ° O O hn > O E O vim- aJ -Q aJ O O iJ aJ O. aJ aJ � O .-i 'O aj � +J +J O aJ aJ p 'in • aJ •U O E O N E aJ >O aJ E aJ aj (p O aJ aJ O aJ E O O O ° O u ° O hn 0 O ° aJ C 3 O C aJ � > U U U N .p O u 0 � O O � O O aJ U � � V >,-O O U IH O i a1 0 o O ° O hn 'C u O OO aJ > O Q > O C •� C O ,+J (0 N >, (0 C� 6 (p hD E �Cp U aj CC E : (p E O E c O E > Q E O O 00 > u 00 hn (0 aJ .Q v'- O 2 003 O0 OJ .. 4- C O hn 'O �f O 'O C O 'O -O O ,O aJ O aJ O aJ aJ O Ij u v (yo u V1 0 v on v O m v v ° m" ° 3 o m v o 3 0 c N O v E u m 0 OJm v v aJ `O v H ° v a s ° v on a`J v d aJ .� ° .� m _ c m O c m c 3 ° °O E > u u 0 'm 0 v u 0 o v u 0 aj 'u 'gin (o hn aJ 'u O hn aJ 00 Ohn aJ •� i hn aJ 00 _ oO Q m E v c c N 0 v 0 .� N 0 O N 0 v o .� N 0 s ° E .° v° E v •� m U E " N m u .� E 0°c o .0 'm N E o0n C C Q N C .0 C E -0 v on 0 E 0 v on 0 N a`"i ax � 0 E a`"i v � 0 v aJ ° E a u Q Q Q v u a a Q v Q Q Q Q v H Q Q Q Q v � ° = O (n o a v o o O o 0 0 o v v o v o O n {A E a (0 .Q U o (0 .Q U � (6 ri N K1 m .0 H N K1 t U a (0 ri N C aJ aJ E O O zt O C -0 v O C u O N � O O O u O U (� O aJ � aj � bn Q + N N OJ in E O — = 0 _ ° > O aj ^ O ° 0 m aj 0 U �Q co aJ (uo aJ QLL N aJ O _ E h N h 00 C N O O i Y 0 Q1 O 6 C C N V LL uO N LO Cl) .O v O 'aj O l0 V U aj aj a - _ hn N (o .� .0 aJ �- O C p � . (a O O •� M .E c O Qbn N U m N N O N N LL a O C vim- i 'O U m aJ N aJ 'O 'O (0 aJ OJ C m aJ (o •�n C m CT C v -Q -O (0 aJ N u hn m '� OM E .._ O .� in �n O O -p O aJ aJ bn -O aJ C v O .Q V1 O U C aJ 'O v E C E ��/1 O U aJ E 'O aJ m aJ u O m O O O X 00 .0 O .5 N �.- > ,� � CO aj C O (o O v aJ U O IH v !o a O. N C 'M (0 (p .� x O U C O. (o '� � O. O (0 aJo O -O aJ aJ E Ohn O N aJ o hn ow O O C C C aJ a aJ C (o aJ O O a aJ C > E o E E E E v nrn p p E p (o O hOn vi U O 'O OQ O .m-i p O a1 aJ aJ > O U > 'O > > 'O O N +�-' 'O > aJ a N v a O a.�O -p -O -p (o 'O .0 O N hn p a O u O hA N O O- O O -p aJ �n C a O N aJ aJ C .0 p .2 > p -O aJ 'O O 0 i aJ 8v a N C bn a O v O. aJ O > O O O ,v Ij v U i O E FO O O u O vim- O O p N '� a1 O C .0 > O. O in O. O. U in .0 !a (a O a _ 'O O E u > 0u U _O u u 0 -O 'E aJ i aJ a.� u u C �n a (o O F O (p N '„ (o (o U 4� aJ U O. E .O (o (o � -p 'E E a v a m fl fl v m m E v fl fl v C (a aJ ° aJ U hn aJ aJ (0 O X hn O > aJ N U O N ~ U aJ a = J H H (NO Q Q •N U -O Hbn U 'N N +�+ v -p U (0 .Q m U .0 m M .O m U w 00 N O Q1 0 O N aJ LL CD N LO Cl) o •• U U Al- m m O O ° > a 3 m ° � o p v 3 ° v v m o v LL > o bn _^ 0 0 0 o 0 ° v v ° aJ v v v o 0 m `m E E E c 0 ° E o E o c E aJ E E No OJ N N N N `o U E c c 0 m c aJ c o c m O O 3 O O O m O >.`+aJ- U c 't' U aJ u aJ co �f 'Q U N m m 0 E 'OJ LA O -O 0 E O �p -0 E > O CT U U •j U U N m U V1 aJ >' aJ O aJ i Q aJ > N oo .c (0 a -C N 'C° 0 O aJ N 48 0 0 O m O hn p a-C.., aJ O a c (00 c Vn m c > a 0 •aj aJ O m E 0 ° E > E > ° N E E O O O a O hn m O c — hA N v •� v O 'O 'O 0 a O aJ u aJ c �o N c �o coo c !yo E -0 >• m c o j o`n ° m v ° m •� `o m o 3 ° co N O u a u a c >. u a V Ln >• u a ` O 0 aJ aJ m 0 aJ aJ aJ .0 0 aJ 0 0 N aJ 0 aJ N �f 'O 'O N •to 'O U N •m U N .N ,� U ,� 0 nn in iri c •`_^ �n .i m (00 'Q v .Q aJ aJ �-i -Q aJ bn c aJ _ N m N N .. 0 c m o O .c m — N c m c 'O ° 0 — N 0 •c m c hn 0 O .c hn E v c ° un 0 v un 0 0 ° .E 0 , 0- v E .� c0i E ° 3 m u E coo .� .� ^ o E on �_ ._^ -m U c >. •x c Q x c ._ 0 x c v 0 N x 0 .0 _ E - .0 v on E aJ on v v on 0 aJ .E u c v v on 0 u Q Q Q v v ° Q Q Q v Q Q Q Q v H � = H O cn u Q Q Q v OJ v o v o 0 0 0 (A E m .Q U - hn m .Q U o m �-i N m o .Q a m .Q �-i N cr1 U rH, N cr1 ot c O 0 .0 m aJ 0M aJ -0 >, p u O O rH u 0 v 0 U hn � aJ _ m O m aJ v 'C a�.� i —u a m C E -0 m a E Vj U m p c aJ O..c in i aJ -Zt m aJ N O Ql 'O talil C ate.+ aJ — U •°A hn a hn ate.+ ri O. ate.+ Q E .-1 .-1 aJ c 0 a ° v °0° m m a` •3 c c N E o ZF v v >• E �aJ m m v -0 o u -0 c c 0 v -° m v >'v m v E o N > aJ E N o `^ •C v ou N =hn (Qo .Q N '� 9' aJ cOo O }J m N a0� O 00 a�.� 0 'U^ v O .c 0 O -O .� aJ 0 c -Q N+J fl. v U m m U ° u o io i c m �° o m m u 3 a`J v o m E °l m o -0 c aci v ° v s m v v -0 m > > ^ .0 aJ v v o v c v ^ _^ aaj -0 m v o coo t O = `m v ° E v 3 a m c 0 E 0 3 N -m v o c N v c u v s a`J - '0 m c 0 > aJ -c a aJ N m c > '3 u `m a 3 � ^ = >. -0 O 0 aJ O E v aJ U *= c m c m .0 v v 0 > i > m 0 _ 0 0 0 ° E p m '� m m .0 v v vaj v m o E v o n �a ^ c a c aJ O > O in aJ ° N >• O •. aJ E aJ �n _ u .c 0 al '° Ql aJ 0 Ql U c aJ aJ aJ _ > o aJ E v c v E o E v a E m °A v v o _ _ L! N — > N N 0 u N c N O c .0 -0 U '''.' aJ 'n 0 (0o ON O.O 0 > u m O i aJ E aJ N >• aJ �n �n — 0 O N .-i �1 �f a.� a.� O .'n — C.Q aJ 0 +J N _0 (moo m c aJ O 'O E 'VI aJ c +J aJ aJ M aJ N (0 m pn c i — E O > .; 0 0 m m c .c E O c m O '0 aJ cc •'^ >• O � aJ ._ 3 ° m a N abn Q o m o ? v 'E o c N E c > c11 O cn N ° N N 3 v i m > o m v c 0 v n _ E v ° a v 0 on v 0 0 m c m v o E v u c m > aaj c ° v v v v m 0 p N 0E •u �' E v o c v v '3 Oc c .c .c -0 `o > c c o c i v aJ E v a - u o ff H c Q u o 0 o v a p V u E E ° 0 o m v 0 c v ,o u m E 0 v > o v > o o o c v o v 0 n m u n `m u u `m m r ia cri o °� E c 0 0 cn 3 E a 0 D 'Fa00 C N O o � Y 0 C11 O C = N 0 aJ LL r- N LO Cl) hn W ? m O c _ hn Y 'O .0 >- c O UO O W hn Obn _0 Lp O -O O E a N O O -O W Ln bn N a O C E N u -O aJ O N O Q U O Q a.� O aJ c O O 'O c C •�n ° E m E aJ aJ +J aJ O._ hn hn > 9 O u e u 'O N •> C U � .Q w U — aJ m -O ON m O N O. m Ln V1 'Q hc On 0 ' n0 u in in m O `~ 0 m m '� aJ m O Q m 'Q O ° m E O aJ E aJ •� O '� c m ate.+ U -° > >. U m c 9' v- '> Q O vim- >, .Q W 0 0 aJ N N N -O O U i V1 N U E U w w U N c O v O aJ m O V1 m a m c (p a bn C O U v 0 -O c m O aJ N O E u ,.O- 'O O" v O O. aJ 'j O m ° o E v v o o. v E E Q c E E c on o E °o°o u a N o v m 0 N ai o > m j o ° a o c ° u ° o c v v 0v N c v N > v E v m v v c m on SO v •� r E _ aJ (p .p N U E aJ •j m LL m �0 O U N a N a O Q v O 10 O O aJ O hn Q N N +J O >, E N u a _ -- Q aJ W i > u v > -� v o > v u o m m ° v v ° ° m ^ v o v a v °o_° io o '^ v °o° m v m +J o -o ami v •u .0 m -° o s •„ v 0 ° v c `m :E fl - E o `m `m c o " s ° ° ° u .a ° v m v v s - v v s m Mo v m v N on o ° N N v on on ma m v ° c ° c v ° -m 0_ 30 m .c v '� > a" `0 v v � u " -° v o O v p -° 0 o ° o o •� m y c o `o c v -' o c 0 -c c M -° v o. a 0 bb cyo o. U 'C O Q aJ +J hA Y aJ vaJ- c m "o E v ° c ° o 0 ° •fl o ° o _ o v 0 0 c o `m Om v c o v v m u fl a � � o v u m . . a c .x fl c `O = � v E c m m c0 aJ N W _0 O x > U U hn W m O •N aJ W W -Q .5 Q W N hA H a>i H Q `^ Q m Lu Q H Q v "- H Z Q 'N 0 m o '^ � v v E O > -m c m . .Q a U 'O O aJ m m m .Q m m W .Q u Y 'O 'O m Ln N 75 Q 0 O -O -° io m _ c 0 v ° E ° c ° i o E ° aoi —° v 3 c m > c ° b 3 W a a c o fl c o 0 3 v o o N _ o m U u m u m N v N o o. o O O O a�.� i aJ aJ w c N c o o o N o v u m c a in O c U W hn o ° ° N m v o ° o 0 E � o ° v 0 u o _0 O o m o v -^ o m c o C, m E O � v -° v v > m co- o v m c U c � c 3 x •N a v ^ g o a - v tin v c v v >_ ° `0 `o on � v m v v v m om ,o o 'o v u N m O U O > > aJ 'O m O -O Y v U c i U .Q w N M ON ° O> — m — i O O m 0 0 in .c m 0 O co E `m E u c c a o m > .m ° o ° v ° o v v on ° O c E c ° u `" o v c ° ° v E -Fum 43 c o aui m 3 N v E 3 E '� m o o o ° o v m O E20 U O N U -O 'O N O O U U .N c aJ D +' O W Nam,., _ a m u M -c N O 'n ow -° 0 aJ hn ..'CJ O •c O O C 10 > .. vim- aJ M .Q O O C . .Q — aJ w > U O N c = .Q '� .� U O u U •C 0 v m E O U � - O hn i N w •� v -0 > •-i ;� v v v m .`_^ s vi •X .,'�� m ,c i `0 3 v 'w^ o •� ° u v c m v ° u v 3 v v fl m o ° m .c ° O o o m 3 E m 'm E E ' •c v •� > s v "U v c E - a te c c `m 'm > o o = v ° m - v v m o Q v E -° o O o m " O o u .N _ o o E E o m o o v m E •� _ CL ° o fl +- o c v s ° u E E o c v u o u o m c E v o =o -m -° r v v u on m o E E ° -^ - o 2 o c " o c . m v c E `m o 0 0 on ' m on u v ° o ou v E •- ° v ^ U u v "u N ° ° 'N v v .� fl ° E s o°ns s u s >s v v v v v o v X o o m v c v u o m U s m c m v s ' v H � c H m H E H -c v H °- H E u v m o E co m .: .0 rH u a-ai =o ai °° .� on 17 3 �� ._ �.J co o o. 00 N O Q1 0 O N aJ LL q R � $ OJ blo% : ( aj 0 a 0 \ \ \ \ _ �\ \ �OJ \ \ \ / / \\o : e § § ( \ aj \ 0w \ � MW _ : . e g [ « /aj / zE = \ — \ - { / - 2 / \ / IL aj/ { a 0 015 \ [ OJ _ - o § » = » & \ \ { 2 ) \ } \ ( ƒ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ / \ 3 / 0 Exhibit 1 to Ordinance# -2021 l 475240 `• ; ' 475250 475260 �O �Al 475270 I I ; 475280 B AVE U U) r o r U) N The Monroe County Future Land Use District is amended as indicated above. Future Land Use District change of fifteen parcels of land in Key Largo having Real Estate Numbers 00475240-000000,00475250-000000, 00475260-000000,00475270-000000,and 00475280-000000 from N Residential Medium(RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial(MC) 3529 3 � t1 5 MEMORANDUM 6 MONROE COUNTY PLANNING&ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 7 We strive to be caring,professional and fair 8 9 To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners 10 11 Through: Emily Schemper, CFM, AICP, Senior Director of Planning & Environmental 12 Resources 13 14 From: Cheryl Cioffari,AICP, Assistant Director of Planning; and 15 Devin Tolpin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner 16 17 Date: November 9, 2023 18 19 Subject: An Ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending 20 the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium (RM) to 21 Mixed Use / Commercial (MC), for property located at 103925, 103935, 103945, 22 103955, 103965 Overseas Highway, Key Largo, as proposed by Abit Holdings, 23 LLC (File#2019-029) 24 25 Meeting: December 13, 2023 26 27 28 I. REQUEST 29 30 On February 19, 2019, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department received an 31 application to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation from 32 Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use / Commercial (MC) for five (5) platted lots on US1, at 33 approximate mile marker 104 in Key Largo. On May 30, 2023, an amended application was 34 submitted by David Thompson on behalf of Abit Holdings, LLC (the "Applicant"). The property is 35 legally described as Block 7, Lots 9-13, Largo Sound Village. The Applicant has also requested a 36 corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) map amendment for the subject property from Improved 37 Subdivision (IS) to Suburban Commercial (SC). The subject of this agenda item is transmittal of 38 the proposed FLUM amendment to State Land Planning Agency for state review. BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 1 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3530 J c 0,✓ �%r'l/��V, l / r' i.. i�/'%� ,lli C7 a. "�i��'�r'.., /, ��f��J p ����/� ,r,, �l %� yt // 1,� (, i` I /� ;,�F iF �/� �I „� �<, iU;': s l";v�;/ ° ii��� jo, �� a'li�l,il��y,�,,, Jli .,lU� ,,1, ;�,�/ / / /n,r, r������r Gil:./1 � G,/,,, �,/ � „!� 11l P�:,,p:)?t % � � %dli ,� °�i,, ;9. „ rr ,I ,oG �u;� 1 Ji�!' '!; F,',�' �nwt i "%' �,,;,'�" 'tv 2 Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation 3 4 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5 6 Site Information: a 7 Location: MM 104, Key Largo 8 Address: 103925, 103935, 103945, 103955, 103965 « 9 Overseas Highway 10 Description: Block 7, Lots 9-13, Largo Sound Village ; � 11 (Plat Book 4, Page 92) 12 Parcel ID Number: 00475240-000000; 00475250- � 13 000000; 00475260-000000, 00475270-000000 and 14 00475280-000000 d, 15 Owner/Applicant: Abit Holdings, LLC a �& a �I'�� 16 Size of Affected Portion of Property: 31,115.9 SF a, 17 (0.741 acres) per survey by Lincoln Iturrey, P.A., �4 18 Professional Land Surveyors and Mappers, dated 7/24/13. . 19 FLUM Designations: Residential Medium(RM) 20 Land Use Districts: Improved Subdivision(IS) 21 Tier Designation: III / 22 Flood Zones: X 23 CBRS: No 24 Existing Use: Vacant 25 Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Undeveloped Land 26 Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include vacant land and 27 residential uses to the east and south; commercial uses to the north and west(across US 1). 28 29 The property currently has a Land Use District (Zoning) designation of Improved Subdivision (IS) 30 and a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of Residential Medium (RM). The Property was 31 within the BU-1 district(light business district)prior to September 15, 1986. From 1986 to 1992, the 32 Property was within the Suburban Residential (SR) zoning district. In 1992, the Property was 33 designated as Improved Subdivision (IS) zoning district. With the adoption of the Comprehensive BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 2 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3531 I Plan's FLUM in 1997, the property was given the current FLUM designation of Residential Medium 2 (RM). 3 4 The property is currently vacant and is designated as Tier III. A vegetation survey/existing 5 conditions report was not submitted with the application to confirm the habitats. 6 7 The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed amendment is "to allow for various types of 8 residential and non-residential uses, excluding industrial and similar uses". The Applicant's full 9 explanation and justification of the proposed amendment is included in the file for the application 10 (File#2019-029). 11 12 Staff is reviewing the proposed amendment for consistency with State Statutes (including 163.3187, 13 F.S., above), Rules, internal consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and balancing all the 14 requirements and policy issues. 15 16 Community Meeting and Public Participation 17 In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on August 26, 2019, to 18 discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment and corresponding Land Use 19 District(Zoning) Map amendment and to provide for public participation. There were approximately 20 37 people in attendance who provided feedback on the item. Issues identified included: limiting the 21 development to high-end single-family residences, concern regarding the increased density and 22 affordable housing. 23 24 Development Review Committee and Public Input 25 The Development Review Committee considered the proposed amendment at a regular meeting on 26 November 18, 2019 and received public input. On November 21, 2019, the Chair of the DRC signed 27 Resolution Nos. DRC 13-19 and DRC 14-19, recommending APPROVAL of the proposed 28 amendments to the Land Use District Map and Future Land Use Map to the Planning Commission 29 and Board of County Commissioners 30 31 Planning Commission and Public Input 32 On November 19, 2019, the Planning Commission (PC) considered the proposed FLUM 33 amendment, provided for public comment and recommended denial through PC Resolution P52-19. 34 Staff had recommended approval of the proposed FLUM change, as it was consistent with the Goals 35 Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, did not adversely impact 36 concurrency standards, provided nonresidential uses and affordable housing uses and density. Per 37 Resolution P52-19, the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial was due to: (1) the 38 proposed FLUM is anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the surrounding area 39 and (2) the proposed amendment may result in an adverse change in community character in the 40 subarea an adverse impact. 41 42 43 44 45 46 BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 3 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3532 1 III. AMENDMENT REVIEW 2 Maximum Allocated Density and Intensity by Future Land Use Map Designation 3 Maximum development Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon density/intensity Residential 1 du/lot 5 units Allocated Density Residential Medium(RM) TDR/Market Rate IS zoning Residential Max Net N/A 0 units Density Total Upland Area: 5 lots Affordable (31,115 SF/0.714 ac) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units Density 0.571 buildable acres (0.714 ac—0.20 open space Transient 0 rooms/spaces/acre 0 rooms or spaces ratio) Allocated Density Nonresidential 0 FAR 0 SF Maximum Intensity Maximum development Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon density/intensity Residential 3 du/acre(SC) 2.14 units Allocated Density TDR/Market Rate 6du/buildable acre Mixed Use/Commercial(MC) Residential Max Net 3.42 units SC zoning Density (SC) Total Upland Area: 5 lots Affordable 31,115 SF/0.714 ac 18di�1bnildable acre ( ) Residential Max Net (SC) 10.29 units Density 0.571 buildable acres (0.714 ac—0.20 open space Transient 10-25 ratio) Allocated Density rooms/spaces/acre 7-17 rooms/spaces Nonresidential 0.10—0.45 FAR 3,111 SF— 14,001 SF Maximum Intensity (SC,UC,DR,MU) Residential Market Rate Allocated: ...2.86 a iit TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: 13,42 ufl� uuII° II II�'DIH, Net Change in Development Affordable Residential Max Net: 1 II0,21) ojiiriiiiL a1°1'oirchulJo Potential Based on FLUM Transient Allocated: +]I"/ uruwuurru / I{r� s.�'^-;i Nonresidential: 1 II4,00 II S Ire' 4 BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 4 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3533 I The above table provides an approximation of the development potential for residential, transient 2 and commercial development. Section 130-156(b) of the Land Development Code states: "The 3 density and intensity provisions set out in this section are intended to be applied cumulatively so that 4 no development shall exceed the total density limits of this article. For example, if a development 5 includes both residential and commercial development, the total gross amount of development shall 6 not exceed the cumulated permitted intensity of the parcel proposed for development." 7 8 As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in a 9 decrease of 2.86 units in permanent allocated residential development potential; an increase of 3.42 10 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs (note: this 11 remains less than the allocated development potential for market rate permanent units under the 12 current FLUM); an increase of 10.29 units in affordable residential development potential; an 13 increase of 17 rooms or spaces for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development 14 potential of 14,001 square feet. The County has adopted Policy 101.5.26 (discouragement policy) 15 which requires increases in allocated residential density to be offset with the dedication of land. 16 This amendment does not trigger this requirement as the allocated density is decreasing. 17 18 Staff is still recommending approval of the proposed FLUM amendment, based on staff s findings 19 that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals Objectives and Policies of the Monroe 20 County Comprehensive Plan. Regarding community character, the Property is located across US 1 21 from several commercial uses including: The Marina Club (boat storage), Sundowners (restaurant), 22 Jimmy Johnson's Big Chill (hotel and restaurant) and the Caribbean Club (bar). The parcels 23 immediately north of the Property, adjacent to US 1, is Gus's Toy Box (boat sales). Staff does not 24 anticipate that the proposed FLUM will adversely impact the community character of the 25 surrounding area, as parcels along US 1 in this location already include both commercial and 26 residential uses. Additionally, the following characteristics of the property support staff s analysis: 27 28 (1) Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land 29 (2) Existing Tier Designation: III 30 (3) Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened Species: Zero 31 (4) Existing Use: Vacant 32 (5) Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include vacant land and 33 residential uses to the east and south; commercial and residential uses to the north and west 34 (across US 1). 35 36 Any proposed new residential, transient or nonresidential use would be subject to the requirements 37 of Chapter 138 of the Land Development Code related to the Residential and Nonresidential Rate of 38 Growth Ordinance (ROGO/NROGO)permit process. 39 40 It should be noted, while this amendment provides an increase of 3.42 units in max net density 41 residential potential for market rate units, this can only be utilized with the transfer of TDRs 42 (transferring and retiring density from a sender site so there is no net increase in density). 43 44 Further, it should be noted, while this amendment provides an increase of 10.29 units in affordable 45 residential development potential, the County's pool of available affordable allocations may be 46 depleted by the time this applicant submits a development proposal. If the affordable housing BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 5 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3534 I allocation pool is depleted, the applicant will need to limit its development proposal request to 2 nonresidential uses within the SC zoning district and/or propose to transfer ROGO exemptions to 3 enable any proposed affordable residential development. As a potential third option, pursuant to 4 Policy 101.3.10, the applicant may coordinate and request to transfer affordable allocations from a 5 municipality to the County through an interlocal agreement. 6 7 As before, staff is recommending approval of the proposed FLUM change, as it is consistent with the 8 Goals Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, does not adversely 9 impact concurrency standards, provides alternative nonresidential uses and affordable housing uses 10 and density. 11 12 It should be noted that the proposed corresponding land use (zoning) district amendment would also 13 alter the as-of-right and conditional uses permitted on the subject property. A comparison table of as- 14 of-right uses and conditional uses for the Improved Subdivision (IS) and Suburban Commercial (SC) 15 land use districts is provided as an attachment. 16 17 Compatibility with the Surrounding Area 18 a. Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land 19 b. Existing Tier Designation: III 20 c. Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened 21 Species: Zero 22 d. Existing Use: Vacant 23 e. Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: 24 Adjacent land uses include vacant land and 25 residential uses to the east and south; commercial 26 uses to the north and west(across US 1). 27 y 28 The Property is located across US I from several 29 commercial uses including The Marina Club (boat 30 storage), Sundowners (restaurant), Jimmy Johnson's Big 1 „ 31 Chill (hotel and restaurant) and the Caribbean Club (bar). ME 32 The parcels immediately north of the Property, adiacent to „ `iM !��ih�� �� 33 US 1, is Gus's Toy Box (boat sales). The proposed FL UM 34 is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the surrounding area of parcels 35 along US I is predominately commercial. 36 37 Concurrency Analysis (Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.1.1) 38 Traffic Circulation (Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.1) 39 The subject property is located at the intersection of US 1 and B Avenue in Key Largo at 40 approximately mile marker 105. The property is accessible by via US 1 and B Avenue. Pursuant to 41 the Comprehensive Plan, the level of service standard for US 1 is LOS of "C." According to the 42 2021 US 1 Arterial Travel Time and Delay Study, US 1 overall is operating at a LOS of"C" and 43 Segment 23 on Key Largo (MM 99.5 to MM 106) is operating at a LOS of"A." 44 45 A Level 1 traffic impact study was submitted by the Applicant. At the time of development approval, 46 a trip generation analysis will be required to be submitted in order to verify sufficient roadway BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 6 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3535 I capacity. According to the 2021 US 1 Arterial Travel Time and Delay Study, the maximum reserve 2 volume for Segment 23 is 11,148 trips. 3 4 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the Traffic Circulation LOS. 5 6 Potable Water(Comprehensive Plan Policy 701.1.1) 7 Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's water treatment facility in Florida City has a maximum water 8 treatment design capacity of 29.8 million gallons per day (MGD) and is capable of treating up to 9 23.8 MGD. The annual average daily demand in Monroe County is 17.79 MGD. 10 11 The proposed FLUM amendment would decrease permanent allocated residential density beyond 12 what is already permitted and could result in a net decrease in demand from this site. 13 14 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Potable Water LOS. 15 16 Solid Waste (Comprehensive Plan Policy 801.1.1) 17 Monroe County has a contract with Waste Management authorizing the use of in-state facilities 18 through September 30, 2024; thereby,providing the County with approximately five (5)more years of 19 guaranteed capacity for solid waste. Currently, there is adequate capacity for solid waste generation. 20 All commercial solid waste is handled by private contract. 21 22 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Solid Waste LOS. 23 24 Sanitary Sewer (Comprehensive Plan Policy 901.1.1 25 The County has adopted water quality treatment standards for wastewater facilities and within the 26 Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Master Plan, Exhibit 3-8, has stated the LOS standard for residential 27 and nonresidential flow is 145 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The proposed 28 FLUM amendment would increase the maximum net density on the site to 10.29 dwelling units, 29 which would increase the required flow by 767 gallons per day. Any proposed development on the 30 site will either need to connect to the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant system, or provide on- 31 site sewage treatment and disposal that meets the LOS standards in Policy 901.1.1. 32 33 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Sanitary Sewer LOS. 34 35 IV.CONSISTENCY WITH THE MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE 36 PLAN, THE KEY LARGO COMMUNIKEYS PLAN, THE FLORIDA STATUTES,AND 37 PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT 38 39 A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 40 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, it furthers: 41 42 Goal 101: Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the 43 safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources. 44 45 Objective 101.1 46 Monroe County shall ensure that all development and redevelopment taking place within its BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 7 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3536 I boundaries does not result in a reduction of the level-of-service requirements established and 2 adopted by this comprehensive plan. Further, Monroe County shall ensure that comprehensive 3 plan amendments include an analysis of the availability of facilities and services or demonstrate 4 that the adopted levels of service can be reasonably met. [§163.3177 & 163.3180, F. S.] 5 6 Objective 101.5 7 Monroe County shall regulate future development and redevelopment to maintain and enhance 8 the character of the community and protect natural resources by providing for the compatible 9 distribution of land uses consistent with the designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. 10 11 Policy 101.5.3 12 The principal purpose of the Residential Medium (RM) future land use category is to recognize 13 those portions of subdivisions that were lawfully established and improved prior to the 14 adoption of this plan and to define improved subdivisions as those lots served by a dedicated 15 and accepted existing roadway, have an approved potable water supply, and have sufficient 16 uplands to accommodate the residential uses. Development on vacant land within this land use 17 category shall be limited to one residential dwelling unit for each such platted lot or parcel 18 which existed on or before January 4, 1996. 19 20 Policy 101.5.6 21 The principal purpose of the Mixed Use/Commercial(MC) future land use category is to provide 22 for the establishment of mixed use commercial land use (zoning) districts where various types of 23 commercial retail and office may be permitted at intensities which are consistent with the 24 community character and the natural environment. Employee housing and commercial 25 apartments are also permitted. In addition, Mixed Use/Commercial land use districts are to 26 establish and conserve areas of mixed uses, which may include maritime industry, light industrial 27 uses, commercial fishing, transient and permanent residential, institutional, public, and 28 commercial retail uses. 29 30 This future land use category is also intended to allow for the establishment of mixed use 31 development patterns, where appropriate. Various types of residential and nonresidential uses 32 may be permitted; however, heavy industrial uses and similarly incompatible uses shall be 33 prohibited. The County shall continue to take a proactive role in encouraging the preservation 34 and enhancement of community character and recreational and commercial working waterfronts. 35 In order to protect environmentally sensitive lands, the following development controls shall 36 apply to all hammocks,pinelands, and disturbed wetlands within this land use category: 37 1. only low intensity commercial uses shall be allowed; 38 2. a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10 shall apply to nonresidential development; and 39 3. maximum net residential density shall be zero. 40 41 42 Policy 101.5.25 43 Monroe County hereby adopts the following density and intensity standards for the future land 44 use categories, which are shown on the FLUM and described in Policies 101.5.1 - 101.5.20. 45 BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 8 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3537 Future Land Use Densities and Intensities Residential 0) Nonresidential Minimum Future Land Use Open Space Category And 0) Maximum Net DensityRatio Corresponding Allocated Density (a)(b) Maximum Intensity Zoning (per upland acre) (per buildable acre) (floor area ratio) 1 du(DR,MU,MI) 2 du(MI) 0.10—0.45 (SC,UC, 3 du(SC) 6-18du(SC) DR,MU) Mixed Use/ 6 du(UC) 12 du(UC) 0.20 Commercial (MC) Commercial Apartments 12-18 du(MU) <2,500 SF(RV) (RV) 18 du(DR) 0.30-0.60(MI)FAR Residential Medium 1 du/lot(IS,IS-V,IS-M) N/A IR IS-V,IS-M and 2 du/lot(IS-D) ( IS-D 0)zoning) 0 rooms/spaces N/A 0 0.20 Notes: (a) The allocated densities for submerged lands, salt ponds, freshwater ponds, and mangroves shall be 0 and the maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. (b) The Maximum Net Density is the maximum density allowable with the use of TDRs, or for qualifying affordable housing development. TDRs can be utilized to attain the density between the allocated density standard up to the maximum net density standard. Deed restricted affordable dwelling units may be built up to the maximum net density without the use of TDRs."N/A"means that maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. Buildable acres means the portion of a parcel of land that is developable and is not required open space. (c) Additional open space requirements may apply based on environmental protection criteria; in these cases, the most restrictive requirement shall apply. (d) Future land use categories of Agriculture/Aquaculture, Education, Institutional, Preservation, Public Buildings/Lands, and Public Facilities, which have no directly corresponding zoning, may be used with new or existing zoning districts as appropriate. (e) Within the Mainland Native future land use district, campground spaces and nonresidential buildings shall only be permitted for educational,research or sanitary purposes. (f) For properties consisting of hammocks, pinelands or disturbed wetlands within the Mixed Use/Commercial and Mixed Use/ Commercial Fishing future land use categories, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.10 and the maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. (g) A mixture of uses shall be maintained for parcels designated as MI zoning district that are within the MC fiiture land use category. Working waterfront and water dependent uses, such as marina, fish house/market, boat repair, boat building, boat storage, or other similar uses, shall comprise a minimum of 35% of the upland area of the property,adjacent to the shoreline,pursuant to Policy 101.5.6. (h) In the RV zoning district, commercial apartments shall be allowed, not to exceed 10% of total spaces allowed or in existence on the site,whichever is less. (i) The allocated density for the CFSD-20 zoning district(Little Torch Key) shall be 1 dwelling unit per acre, or 1 dwelling unit per parcel for those parcels existing as of September 15, 1986, whichever is less, and the maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. Residential density shall be allowed in addition to the permitted nonresidential uses and intensity(i.e.,density and intensity shall not be counted cumulatively). (j) Within IS subdivisions with primarily single family residential units, IS-D zoning may be used with a RM fiiture land use designation for platted lots which have a duplex that was lawfiilly established prior to September 15, 1986. BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 9 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3538 (k) The maximum net density shall be 25 du/buildable acre for the UR zoning district and shall be 18 du/buildable acre for the MU and SC zoning district for development where all units are deed restricted affordable dwelling units. For the UR zoning district market rate housing may be developed as part of an affordable or employee housing project with a maximum net density not exceeding 18 du/buildable acre. (1) Vessels, including live-aboard vessels, or associated wet slips are not considered dwelling units and do not count when calculating density. 1 2 Policy 101.19.2 3 The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as a part 4 of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following Community 5 Master Plans have been completed in accordance with the principles outlined in this section and 6 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: 7 8 9 5. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is incorporated by reference into 10 the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Only the Strategies denoted with a green checkmark in I I this Master Plan have been adopted and approved as equivalent to the term Objectives 12 in the Comprehensive Plan. Only the Action Items denoted with a green checkmark in 13 this Master Plan have been adopted equivalent to the term Policy in the Comprehensive 14 Plan. Strategies and Action Items without a green checkmark next to them are not 15 considered to be consistent with the definitions of "Objective" and "Policy" and 16 therefore do not serve as equivalents. Adopted by Ordinance 012-2007. 17 18 Goal 102: Monroe County shall direct future growth to lands which are most suitable for 19 development and shall encourage conservation and protection of environmentally sensitive lands 20 (wetlands, beach berm and tropical hardwood hammock). 21 22 Policy 105.2.1 23 Monroe County shall designate all lands outside of mainland Monroe County, except for the 24 Ocean Reef planned development, into three general categories for purposes of its Land 25 Acquisition Program and smart growth initiatives in accordance with the criteria in Policy 26 205.1.1. These three categories are: Natural Area (Tier 1); Transition and Sprawl Reduction 27 Area (Tier II) on Big Pine Key and No Name Key only; and Infill Area (Tier III). The purposes, 28 general characteristics, and growth management approaches associated with each tier are as 29 follows: 30 31 32 3. Infill Area (Tier 111): Any defined geographic area, where a significant portion of 33 land area is not characterized as environmentally sensitive as defined by this Plan, 34 except for dispersed and isolated fragments of environmentally sensitive lands of 35 less than four acres in area, where existing platted subdivisions are substantially 36 developed, served by complete infrastructure facilities, and within close proximity 37 to established commercial areas, or where a concentration of nonresidential uses 38 exists, is to be designated as an Infill Area. New development and redevelopment 39 are to be highly encouraged, except within tropical hardwood hammock or 40 pineland patches of an acre or more in area, where development is to be 41 discouraged. Within an Infill Area are typically found: platted subdivisions with BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 10 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3539 1 50 percent or more developed lots situated in areas with few sensitive 2 environmental features; full range of available public infrastructure in terms of 3 paved roads, potable water, and electricity; and concentrations of commercial and 4 other nonresidential uses within close proximity. In some Infill Areas, a mix of 5 nonresidential and high-density residential uses (generally 8 units or more per 6 acre) may also be found that form a Community Center. 7 8 Policy 105.2.2 9 Monroe County shall maintain overlay map(s) designating geographic areas of the County as one 10 of the Tiers in accordance with the guidance in Policy 105.2.1, which shall be incorporated as an 11 overlay on the zoning map(s) with supporting text amendments in the Land Development 12 Regulations. These maps are to be used to guide the Land Acquisition Program and the smart 13 growth initiatives in conjunction with the Livable CommuniKeys Program(Policy 101.19.1). 14 15 B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Key Largo Livable Communikeys Plan. 16 Specifically,it furthers: 17 18 Strategy 1.3 19 Continue to utilize the Land Use District Map and supporting FLUM to regulate land use type, 20 density and intensity on individual parcels within the planning area. 21 22 Action Item 1.3.1: Continue to use the FLUM and Land Use District Maps to regulate 23 development of individual parcels with respect to density, intensity, bulk regulations, and all 24 other land development regulation. This will protect the existing conformance status of most uses 25 and promote orderly development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 26 27 Action Item 1.3.7: Evaluate future FLUM change and Land Use District Map change requests for 28 nonconforming uses, proposed changes in use, vacant parcels and other requests, based mainly 29 on comprehensive planning principles and the following community-goal related criteria: 30 a. Promote infill, design flexibility and transfer of density to Community Centers. 31 b. Preserve commercial conformance status within sections along US-1 predominated by 32 existing commercial businesses and disturbed lands. 33 c. Encourage sun-setting of intensive commercial uses within sections along US-1 34 predominated by natural habitat or native-dominated landscape, relatively sparse 35 development and relatively few businesses. 36 d. Preserve commercial use status for existing waterfront uses that support the tourist-based 37 and working waterfront-based economy. 38 e. Give consideration to whether the property provides a unique or outstanding opportunity 39 for enhancement of design, connectivity and other community goals, especially along the 40 US-1 corridor. 41 42 C. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development for the 43 Florida Keys Area, Section 380.0552(7), Florida Statutes. 44 45 For the purposes of reviewing consistency of the adopted plan or any amendments to that plan with 46 the principles for guiding development and any amendments to the principles, the principles shall be BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 11 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3540 I construed as a whole and no specific provision shall be construed or applied in isolation from the 2 other provisions. 3 4 (a) Strengthening local government capabilities for managing land use and development so that 5 local government is able to achieve these objectives without continuing the area of critical 6 state concern designation. 7 (b) Protecting shoreline and benthic resources, including mangroves, coral reef formations, 8 seagrass beds, wetlands, fish and wildlife, and their habitat. 9 (c) Protecting upland resources, tropical biological communities, freshwater wetlands, native 10 tropical vegetation (for example, hardwood hammocks and pinelands), dune ridges and 11 beaches, wildlife, and their habitat. 12 (d) Ensuring the maximum well-being of the Florida Keys and its citizens through sound 13 economic development. 14 (e) Limiting the adverse impacts of development on the quality of water throughout the Florida 15 Keys. 16 (f) Enhancing natural scenic resources, promoting the aesthetic benefits of the natural 17 environment, and ensuring that development is compatible with the unique historic character 18 of the Florida Keys. 19 (g) Protecting the historical heritage of the Florida Keys. 20 (h) Protecting the value, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and amortized life of existing and 21 proposed major public investments, including: 22 23 1. The Florida Keys Aqueduct and water supply facilities; 24 2. Sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities; 25 3. Solid waste treatment, collection, and disposal facilities; 26 4. Key West Naval Air Station and other military facilities; 27 5. Transportation facilities; 28 6. Federal parks, wildlife refuges, and marine sanctuaries; 29 7. State parks, recreation facilities, aquatic preserves, and other publicly owned 30 properties; 31 8. City electric service and the Florida Keys Electric Co-op; and 32 9. Other utilities, as appropriate. 33 34 (i) Protecting and improving water quality by providing for the construction, operation, 35 maintenance, and replacement of stormwater management facilities; central sewage 36 collection; treatment and disposal facilities; and the installation and proper operation and 37 maintenance of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems. 38 (j) Ensuring the improvement of nearshore water quality by requiring the construction and 39 operation of wastewater management facilities that meet the requirements of ss. 40 381.0065(4)(1) and 403.086(10), as applicable, and by directing growth to areas served by 41 central wastewater treatment facilities through permit allocation systems. 42 (k) Limiting the adverse impacts of public investments on the environmental resources of the 43 Florida Keys. 44 (1) Making available adequate affordable housing for all sectors of the population of the Florida 45 Keys. BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 12 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3541 I (m)Providing adequate alternatives for the protection of public safety and welfare in the event of 2 a natural or manmade disaster and for a postdisaster reconstruction plan. 3 (n) Protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and 4 maintaining the Florida Keys as a unique Florida resource. 5 Pursuant to Section 380.0552(7) Florida Statutes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the 6 Principles for Guiding Development as a whole and is not inconsistent with any Principle. 7 8 D. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.). 9 Specifically, the amendment furthers: 10 11 163.3161(4), F.S. —It is the intent of this act that local governments have the ability to preserve 12 and enhance present advantages; encourage the most appropriate use of land, water, and 13 resources, consistent with the public interest; overcome present handicaps; and deal 14 effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within 15 their jurisdictions. Through the process of comprehensive planning, it is intended that units 16 of local government can preserve, promote, protect, and improve the public health, safety, 17 comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, law enforcement and fire prevention, and 18 general welfare; facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, 19 sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing, and other requirements and 20 services; and conserve, develop, utilize, and protect natural resources within their 21 jurisdictions. 22 23 163.3161(6), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans shall have the 24 legal status set out in this act and that no public or private development shall be permitted 25 except in conformity with comprehensive plans, or elements or portions thereof, prepared 26 and adopted in conformity with this act. 27 28 163.3177(1), F.S. — The comprehensive plan shall provide the principles, guidelines, standards, 29 and strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental, 30 and fiscal development of the area that reflects community commitments to implement the 31 plan and its elements. These principles and strategies shall guide future decisions in a 32 consistent manner and shall contain programs and activities to ensure comprehensive plans 33 are implemented. The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and 34 strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local 35 government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, 36 modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner. It is not 37 the intent of this part to require the inclusion of implementing regulations in the 38 comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land 39 development regulations that will be part of the strategy for implementing the comprehensive 40 plan and the principles that describe how the programs, activities, and land development 41 regulations will be carried out. The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards 42 for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of 43 more detailed land development and use regulations. 44 45 163.3201, F.S. —Relationship of comprehensive plan to exercise of land development regulatory 46 authority. It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans or elements thereof BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 13 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3542 I shall be implemented, in part, by the adoption and enforcement of appropriate local 2 regulations on the development of lands and waters within an area. It is the intent of this act 3 that the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of regulations for the development of 4 land or the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of a land development code for an 5 area shall be based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for an adopted 6 comprehensive plan as required by this act. 7 8 VI. PROCESS 9 10 Any landowner or other person having a contractual interest in property desiring to petition the BOCC 11 for an amendment to the land use (zoning) district map, overlay district map or FLUM shall be required 12 to file an application with the Planning Director accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee as 13 established from time to time by the BOCC to defray the actual cost of processing the application. After 14 receipt, the Planning Director and his or her staff shall review the proposed amendment and present it 15 with a recommendation of approval or denial to the Development Review Committee for review and 16 comment. Staff shall make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. 17 18 The Planning Commission shall review the application, the reports and recommendations of the 19 Planning and Environmental Resources Department, the comments of the Development Review 20 Committee, and the testimony given at the public hearing, and shall submit its recommendations and 21 findings to the BOCC. 22 23 The BOCC shall consider the reports and recommendation of the Planning Commission, Planning and 24 Environmental Resources Department staff, and the testimony given at the public hearings. 25 VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 26 27 Staff recommends approval of the proposed FLUM amendment from Residential Medium (RM) to 28 Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) for property located at 103925, 103935, 103945, 103955, 103965 29 Overseas Highway, Key Largo. 30 31 VIII. EXHIBITS 32 1. 11"X 17"Map Series FLUM Amendment 33 2. Development Review Committee Resolution No. DRC 13-19 34 3. Planning Commission Resolution P52-19 35 4. Comparison of As-of-Right and Conditional Uses 36 5. Transmittal Resolution to State Land Planning Agency 37 6. Draft Ordinance BOCC SR 12.13.2023 Page 14 of 14 File No. 2019-029 3543 Exhibit A to Resolution 2l; 3 ,� 4 .......... a 5 6 7 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9 ORDINANCE NO. - 2023 10 11 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COU BOARD OF 12 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDIN MONROE 13 COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP M ENTIAL 14 MEDIUM (RM) TO MIXED USE / C CIAL FOR 15 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 103965, 55, 103945, 10 ND 16 103925 OVERSEAS HIG Y, ,,,,,,111i KEY L O,1111111,,, 17 APPROXIMATELY MILE M 104, WITH PAR 18 IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 004752 0 475250-00 0; 19 00475260-000000; 00475270-000000 A 0475280-000000; AS 20 PROPOSED BY ABIT "i LDINGS, LL ROVIDING FOR 21 SEVERABILITY; PROVI OR REPEAL CONFLICTING 22 PROVISIONS; PROVIDIN TRANSM TO THE 23 STATE LAND PLANNING A N THE CRETARY OF 24 STATE; PROVIDING FOR S THE MONROE 25 COUNTY C ENSIVE AN AND OR AMENDMENT 26 TO THE TU AND US MAP; PROVIDING FOR AN 27 EFFEC„II a ATE. LE 2019-02 1111 28 29 VI 30 W May 023, the ning and Environmental Resources Department 31 receive amendecatio m Abit Holdings, LLC (the "Applicant") to amend the 32 Mon unty Future Use UM) from Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use / 33 Co ""p01me MC) for 103 1039 103945, 103935 and 103925 Overseas Highway, Key 34 Largo (the erty"); and 35 36 WHE the licant has also requested a corresponding Land Use (Zoning) 37 District map amen the subject property from Improved Subdivision (IS) to Suburban 38 Commercial (SC); an 39 "0 40 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Development Review Committee (DRC) considered 41 the proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 18, 2019; and 42 43 WHEREAS, on November 21, 2019, the Chair of the DRC signed Resolution Nos. DRC 44 13-19 and DRC 14-19, recommending APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the Land 45 Use District Map and Future Land Use Map to the Planning Commission and Board of County 46 Commissioners; and 3544 I WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 19, 2019, the Monroe 2 County Planning Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of considering the proposed 3 amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan 4 and the proposed Zoning map amendment for the Property, and provided for public comment; 5 and 6 7 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission considered the application, the 8 staff report, and the comments from the public in their discussion; 9 10 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was presented wing documents and 11 other information relevant to the request, which by reference is h incorporated as part of the 12 record of said hearing: 13 �l� 14 1. Staff report dated November 8, 2019 prepare C yl Cio ICP, Assistant 15 Director of Planning; 166 2. Sworn Departmentestimony staff; and Monroe County Puumillllll ng & E ironmental Re eslluij11pp0„ 18 3. Advice and counsel of Steve Williams, Ass ttorney, and ohn Wolfe, 19 Planning Commission Counsel. 20 °ippll 21 WHEREAS, based upon the in n and docum on submitted, the Planning 22 Commission found: uuu1p1p0° 23 1. The proposed FLUM is anticipa� to a impa, the community character of 24 the surrounding area; 111111111 25 2. The proposed not anticip to adver y impact the Comprehensive Plan 26 adopted Le Il of Se (LOS); 27 3. The pro endm is consist e IIII it the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 28 Monroe Co u ear Comprehens Plan; and 29 30 4. The osed Key a ofC with the Principles for Guiding Development n tate Concern, Sec. 380.0552(7), F.S.; 31 he propo end is consistent with Part 11 of Chapter 163, Florida Statute; 32 and Ill uu11ppp0 33 °1 e proposed a me nt 1 result in an adverse change in community character to 34 b-area whi amendment affects or to area in accordance with proposed an Y 35 the Largo Li le CommuniKeys master plan pursuant to findings of the BOCC. 36 37 WHEREA nroe County Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P52-19 38 recommending to the nroe County Board of County Commissioners denial of the proposed 39 amendment; and 40 41 WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2023, the Monroe 42 County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the 43 proposed amendment, considered the staff report and provided for public comment and public 44 participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the procedures adopted for 45 public participation in the planning process; and 46 Ord. No. -2023 File 2019-029 Page 2 of 4 3545 I WHEREAS, at the , 2023, public hearing, the BOCC adopted Resolution No. 2 -2023, transmitting the amendment to the State Land Planning Agency; and 3 4 WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency reviewed the amendment and the County 5 received its Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) report on ; 6 and 7 8 WHEREAS, the ORC report ; and 9 10 WHEREAS, in response to t ORC report, 11 and 12 13 WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on t da , the 14 BOCC held a public hearing to consider adoption of the s FLU dment; 15 IIIIIIIIIII 16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED B IIII IIIIIII E MROE COU uiARD OF 17 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: uuuul �I 18 IIIIIII 19 Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of the Monroe my 2030 Comprehensive Plan is 20 amended as follows: °�Illpplllll 21 22 The property located at 103965, 1 45, 10393 103925 Overseas 23 Highway, Key Largo, is changed fro Resi ediu, RM) to Mixed Use / 24 Commercial (MC) as shown on Ex hib 1, the °"and incorporated herein. 25 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII 26 Section 2. SeverabiliIlllf any on, subsect , sentence, clause, item, change, or provision 27 of this ordinance i valid, remainder th' ordinance shall not be affected by such 28 validity. 29 30 Section 3. onsi Provisio All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict 31 with thi lainance ar y re to the extent of said conflict. 32 l uu11ppp0°" 33 Section ansmittal. ordin e shall be transmitted by the Director of Planning to the 34 State Land' ing Agency suan to Chapter 163 and 380, Florida Statutes. 35 36 Section 5. Fih d E ctive Date. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the 37 secretary of the Sta rida but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the 38 State Land Planning gency or Administration Commission finding the amendment in 39 compliance, and if ch lenged, until such challenge is resolved pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida 40 Statutes. 41 42 Section 6. Inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The foregoing amendment shall be 43 incorporated in the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and included on the Future Land Use 44 Map. 45 46 Ord. No. -2023 File 2019-029 Page 3 of 4 3546 I PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, 2 Florida, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 3 4 Mayor Holly Merrill Raschein 5 Mayor Pro Tem James Scholl 6 Commissioner Craig Cates 7 Commissioner Michelle Lincoln 8 Commissioner David Rice 10 11 BOARD OF COUN COMMISSIONERS 12 OF MONROE C LORIDA 13 jjjilll 14 BY 15 OR ' OLLY ME RASCHEIN 16 17 (SEAL) ��muulllllll °pp� III uu11ppp0��� 18 ul 19 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK 2021 °��Ilill�llll 22 AS DEPUTY CLERK uuj11pp0°" IIIIIIIIIII��� Ord. No. -2023 File 2019-029 Page 4 of 4 3547 2 � r 4V, 5 � 7 8 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9 10 RESOLUTION NO. -2023 11 12 A RESOLUTION BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 13 COMMISSIONERS TRANSMITTING TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING 14 AGENCY AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF 15 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE MONROE COUNTY 16 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM ("RM") TO 17 MIXED USE / COMMERCIAL ("MC"), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 103965, 103955, 103945, 103935 AND 103925 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY, KEY 19 LARGO,APPROXIMATE MILE MARKER 104, CURRENTLY BEARING 20 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NOS. 00475240-000000; 00475250-000000; 21 00475260-000000; 00475270-000000 AND 00475280-000000; AS PROPOSED 22 BY ABIT HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; 23 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; 24 PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING 25 AGENCY AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR 26 INCLUSION IN THE MONROE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 27 FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING 28 FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.' 29 30 31 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC", "Board", 32 "Monroe County", or the"County") conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the 33 transmittal pursuant to the State Coordinated Review Process in Florida Statutes § 163.3184(4), to 34 the State Land Planning Agency for objections, recommendations and comments, and to the other 35 Reviewing Agencies as defined in Florida Statutes § 163.3184(1)(c), for review and comment on 36 a proposed amendment to the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan as described above; and 37 38 WHEREAS,the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners supports the transmittal 39 of the requested Future Land Use Map amendment; 40 41 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 42 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: 43 44 Section 1. The foregoing title of this Resolution and above prefatory recitals are hereby 45 incorporated as if fully stated herein. ' Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department File No.2019-029. Resolution -2023 Pagel of 2 BOCC Transmittal: File No.2019-029 3548 46 Section 2. The Monroe County BOCC concurs with, accepts, and by reference adopts all of 47 the analysis, findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Monroe 48 County Planning and Environmental Resources Department professional staff 49 report accompanying the Board's consideration of this Resolution item and 50 recommending its approval, and said analysis and determinations of fact and law 51 within said professional staff report is/are hereby incorporated as if fully stated 52 herein. 53 54 Section 3. The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners does hereby approve the 55 transmittal of the draft ordinance, attached as Exhibit A.,for review of the proposed 56 Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") amendment. 57 58 Section 4. The Board of County Commissioners does hereby transmit the proposed 59 amendment to the State Land Planning Agency for review and comment in 60 accordance with the State Coordinated Review process pursuant to Section 61 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes. 62 63 Section 5. The Department's professional staff is/are given authority to prepare and submit 64 the required transmittal letter and supporting documents for the proposed 65 amendment in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes § 163.3184(4). 66 67 Section 6. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this 68 resolution to the Director of Planning. 69 70 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, 71 Florida, at a regular meeting held on the day of December, 2023. 72 73 74 Mayor Holly Merrill Raschein 75 Mayor Pro Tem James K. Scholl 76 Commissioner Craig Cates 77 Commissioner Michelle Lincoln 78 Commissioner David Rice 79 80 81 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 82 OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 83 84 By: 85 MAYOR HOLLY MERRILL RASCHEIN 86 (SEAL) 87 nnr�nOE O. ,�TTt�n4� Y " " FOR APP 1 Tt 88 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK 89 _.......... _. -_... .. .. . .... ...._ ..._._.__ W. DETER Ga ORRIS 90 ASSISTANT COUNTY ATT 91 AS DEPUTY CLERK lute: 11/28/23 Resolution -2023 Page 2 of 2 BOCC Transmittal: File No.2019-029 3549 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:18 AM To: County Commissioners and Aides Cc: Liz Yongue; Gomez-Krystal; Shillinger-Bob; Schemper-Emily; Morris-Peter Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Land Use and Zoning Change - Property at 103965, 103955, 103945, 103935, and 103925 Overseas Highway, Key Largo Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good morning—please see below.Thank you. L%vuL .yy (3allcwd, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM T}EE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. 0 Please c.on,tldor the ervironrrront when 4�0 decidinghotl'aor to print this oma:aiL From: Michael Rojewski <keysagentmichael@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:03 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: Fwd: Opposition to Proposed Land Use and Zoning Change- Property at 103965, 103955, 103945, 103935, and 103925 Overseas Highway, Key Largo 1 You don't often get email from kevsaaentmichael@gn ail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear Commissioners, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Michael Rojewski, and I am the owner of Rojewski & Rebl Group, a local real estate company that has been proudly selling the Florida Keys since 2004. As a dedicated resident of Largo Sound Village, residing at 245 2nd Rd in Key Largo, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed land use and zoning change for the properties located at 103965, 103955, 103945, 103935, and 103925 Overseas Highway, Key Largo, approximately Mile Marker 104. PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS: 00475240-000000; 00475250-000000; 00475260-000000; 00475270-000000 AND 00475280-000000 Being an active member of this community, my concern is rooted in the potential adverse effects that the proposed change from Residential Medium (RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) may have on our neighborhood.The ordinance, presented by ABIT Holdings, LLC, raises significant concerns regarding property valuations and the potential escalation of traffic along an already congested stretch of road. Here are specific concerns that I wish to bring to your attention: Impact on Property Valuation:The conversion of the area from Residential Medium to Mixed Use/Commercial could lead to a decline in property values within the vicinity.This change may deter potential homebuyers and diminish the overall allure of our neighborhood. Traffic Congestion: Given the existing challenges with traffic in our community, the proposed commercial development may exacerbate this issue. Increased traffic levels could disrupt the quality of life for residents and pose safety concerns for both pedestrians and motorists. I kindly request that you carefully consider the potential consequences of this zoning change on the character of our neighborhood, property values, and traffic conditions. It is crucial to prioritize the well-being and concerns of the residents and local businesses, such as Rojewski & Rebl Group, that have been actively contributing to the community for many years. As a resident of Largo Sound Village and someone deeply connected to the real estate landscape of the Florida Keys, I believe it is essential to protect the unique charm and quality of life that our community offers. I urge you to take into account the collective voice of the residents and local businesses when deliberating on this matter. Thank you for your attention to this vital issue. I trust that, as a representative of our community, you will thoroughly assess the concerns raised by those who are invested in preserving the integrity of our neighborhood. Sincerely, -..........J ch.a e.I.... REALTOR° Owner, Rojewski & Rebl Group Director, Florida Keys Board of Realtors 2 Director/Chairman-Elect, Key Largo Chamber of Commerce a Y c DJr„w���l/%�%//iia�,,,, ,, (I� �' ,.6 ,;�..✓a g. s.I<i.... ....R e.b..I C..o.m..me.r .!. .I. -..M.J c..h..a e.L._Rc..l REALTOR° Director, Florida Keys Board of Realtors Director, Key Largo Chamber of Commerce r a Y c DJr„w���l/%�%//iia�,,,, ,, (I� �' ,.6 ,;�..✓a g. s.I<i.... ....Re.b..I C..o.m..me.r .!. .I. 3 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 9:07 AM To: County Commissioners and Aides Cc: Morris-Peter; Schemper-Emily; Liz Yongue; Gomez-Krystal Subject: FW: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570, 2019-029 Abit Holdings, LLC - FLUM Amendment Good morning- FYI L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO 7WE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,tlder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding whetl'ier to print this erra iL From:joanmmk@aol.com <joanmmk@aol.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 6, 2023 5:49 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570, 2019-029 Abit Holdings, LLC- FLUM Amendment You don't often get email from joanmmk0caol.com. Learn why this is important 1 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear Commissioners: My neighbors and I are opposed to this proposed Zoning Change. These 5 parcels have been part of the Largo Sound Village subdivision since it was first platted in 1959. The entire neighborhood is built as single-family homes, except for the grandfathered commercial use of Gus' Toy Box, which has had businesses on that location since the 1950's. We don't see the need for more commercial property in this area, or the associated traffic, especially in a Residential neighborhood. This is not downtown Key Largo. Reading your agenda item P1,under "Community Character of Immediate Vicinity", its states "Adjacent land uses include... commercial uses to the North and West." The commercial use to the North is a grandfathered non-conformance and there are no adjacent properties to the West. According to Monroe County Municipal Code, Section 101-1 defines, "Adjacent Parcels" and states "An intervening road, right-of-way, or easement shall not eliminate nor destroy the adjacency of 2 parcels, EXCEPT FOR U.S. 111. At this location in Key Largo, going west of the subject parcels there is The Heritage Trail, a Bike Lane, 2 Northbound lanes, a grass median, 2 Southbound lanes, and another Bike Lane before you get to any commercial property. Traffic on the corner of Avenue B and U.S. 1 is terrible now largely due to the obscure angle of 1st Street right at the corner which includes the Heritage Trail phis a bike lane, a school bus stop and a public bus stop. Their have been numerous accidents and a pedestrian death in this area due to highway traffic. There is currently no formal proposal for how the land is to be developed, so this Commission must assume a maximum density, worst-case scenario as a possibility. Four years ago, Mr. Thompson showed us his ideas for commercial retail space like a strip mall on the ground level, phis ten affordable housing units upstairs (lately he has other ideas, such as: ten affordable housing units, coffee shop and self-storage units). These are As-of-right uses for Mixed Commercial so that's a distinct possibility for what happens here. But that's not definitely what could happen here. After the zoning is changed to Mixed Commercial, Mr. Thompson could build almost anything. Your decision could be the last time the County has any significant input as to how these five parcels get developed, and how much traffic is impacted at this already dangerous intersection. Mr. Thompson purchased these 5 lots with the knowledge they were residential lots. He could build 5 modest, entry level owner occupied homes for career workers such as: nurses, firemen,police, teachers -people who work in our communities and want to be a part of them. These homes could have one shared driveway to minimize traffic safety issues. In November 2019, the Monroe County Planning Commission stated that the Key Largo LCP does not support this proposed change and voted 4 to 1 to deny this application. The Planning Commission thought it was a bad idea and would set a bad precedent. Please take their recommendations, along with our neighbors of Largo Sound Village, into your final decision. I have spoken to many neighbors, and they agreed 5 residential houses would cause the least amount of additional traffic. Please keep the safety of our residents, neighborhood, and Key Largo in mind when you make your decision. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, Joan King 411 3rd Street 2 Key Largo, Florida 33037 (305) 916-5446 3 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 3:11 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI L%vuL .yy (3allcwd, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO 7WE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. 0 Please c.on,idor the ervironrrront when 4�0 deciding whether to print this oma:aiL From: Dave King<davidjking@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, December 7, 2023 4:59 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDIS5@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 1 You don't often get email from davidiking@aol.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear Commissioners, My wife & I have lived in Largo Sound Village for 8 years, and we are still opposed to this proposed zoning change. I am an Engineer, and have over 15 years' experience in Planning and Zoning in another state. While reviewing the agenda item for this proposed change, I saw that the Monroe County Development Review Committee had reviewed this at a meeting in November 2019 and recommended approval, and I was interested to see what brought them to this conclusion. Their Resolution DRC 13-19 which is included in the full agenda packet lists 6 items which I will address as follows: 1. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the surrounding area. This statement is highly subjective. During the past 3 months, over 230 taxpaying homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village have signed a petition opposing this change because we all think it will adversely affect the character of the area. The character of Largo Sound Village is single family residences, largely owner-occupied. It is absurd to think that building an apartment building and some nebulous commercial use at the entrance to the neighborhood will not affect the community character. We know the character of our community better than a handful of county employees who do not live here. 2. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Comprehensive Plan adopted Level of Service. The Arterial Traffic Study used for this initial application was done 6 years ago in 2017. Since that time both the 2019 and 2023 Arterial Traffic Studies have resulted in a traffic Level of Service rating of`D' using 2 different methodologies as directed by the County Commissioners. Just because the BOCC does not accept or approve these traffic studies, it does not make them wrong or render them invalid, and it does nothing to improve the poor traffic situation in the Keys. According to the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Policy 301.1.2 "For U.S. 1, Monroe County hereby adopts a level of service (LOS) standard of C, as measured by the methodology established 2 by the U.S. 1 LOS Task Force and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in August 199 L" (since revised) Policy 301.2.3 "Monroe County shall not permit new development which would significantly degrade the LOS below the adopted LOS standards on U.S. 1 (overall) unless the proportionate share of the impact is mitigated. The development of one single family residential unit, on a single parcel, shall be considered de minimis and shall not be subject to this requirement." So, if the Level of Service is already below your adopted standard and "Monroe County shall not permit new development", that should prohibit further development until the traffic situation is rectified and a LOS of"C" or better is verified. The plan does make exception for the "de minimus" development of"one single family residential unit, on a single parcel". But it clearly prohibits commercial and other high-density development. 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan... The minutes from the DRC meeting on Novemberl8, 2019 state that "The proposed amendment was reviewed for compatibility... and staff finds the proposal to be compliant and consistent with the ... Plan, ... Statutes, Principles for Guiding Development and is recommending approval". There were no questions or comments. There was no discussion. And there was no vote. This was a rubber stamp approval. The Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Goal 101 states: "Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources. " So, the absolute first goal listed for your Future Plan includes: "to ensure the safety of county residents. " The traffic situation at the intersection of U.S. 1, Avenue B and l't Street is dangerous enough, especially with the Heritage Trail and a Bike Lane. 5 single family homes would add more traffic right at that corner. Doubling that with 10 affordable housing units would compound the problem, and adding some new commercial traffic on top of that would obviously violate a goal "to ensure the safety of County residents". The smallest impact would be from 5 single-family homes. From the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 2019: "Commissioner Scarpelli did admit that he drove through the area and the intersection is crazy and very intense. There should be a buffer yard if this were to go through to buffer the community and protect that corridor because it does not look like a good situation." 3 But a Zoning change allows for no special conditions, and the County has no authority to require such a buffer beyond what is considered typical. Commissioner Miller stated that "traffic on U.S. 1 is getting worse and it's not this nebulous idea that we have too much traffic. The last traffic study says fifteen of the twenty-four segments in the Keys have degraded since 2017. To vote for a zoning change that increases intensity on these lots is a no-no." Commissioner Coward stated that "Traffic is obviously a problem. Continuing to add commercial increases the intensity and he doesn't see it as something that's needed." Chair Werling also agreed, adding "traffic is a huge issue." There have been at least 9 traffic incidents at or within a few hundred feet of this intersection, including 1 pedestrian fatality, since 2019. So, the Planning Commission recognizes the dangerous traffic situation, and the neighborhood is obviously concerned about it. Therefore, increasing the traffic in an already dangerous location does not support Goal 101 of the 2030 Plan. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development of the Florida Keys Area of Critical Concern, Section 380.0552 subsection 7. So is leaving these 5 parcels zoned Residential for single family homes. Both are consistent with those principles, there is no benefit of one over another. 5. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statute. Chapter 163.2511 Urban infill and redevelopment. "(2) It is declared that: (a) Fiscally strong urban centers are beneficial to regional and state economies and resources, are a method for reduction of future urban sprawl, and should be promoted by state, regional, and local governments." The subject properties are not located in an urban or community center. They are miles from downtown Key Largo: 4 miles from the Post Office, 21/z miles from Publix, DMV and the Library, and 2 miles from this Murray Nelson Government Center. The operable term there is "Center", and these parcels aren't there, so increasing density this far out of town would actually contribute to the "urban sprawl" that Chapter 163 is trying to reduce. Since the commercial 4 properties on the Southbound side of U.S. 1 in this area are not adjacent to the subject property (Monroe County Land Development Code Section 101-1 Defines, "Adjacent Parcels and goes on to say, "... an intervening road, Right of Way or Easement shall not eliminate nor destroy the adjacency of two parcels, except for U.S. 1.'). So, U.S. 1 is recognized as a major boundary, and the Commercial properties across the highway are not adjacent to, nor relevant to, the parcels being discussed here. Those Commercial properties are separated from the subject property by 4 lanes of U.S. 1, a grass median, the Heritage Trail and 2 Bike Lanes. That's not adjacent, they are not even in the same proximity. The Proposed FLUM Designation map shown in your Agenda Packet shows an extremely short stretch of U.S. 1 immediately surrounding the parcels in question. A wider view of the existing FLUM (below) shows a much longer stretch of U.S. 1, and shows Key Largo Canvas is the ONLY Commercial Zoning on the ocean side of the highway from Largo Cargo north to Price Automotive. That is 1.4 miles of houses and hammock. 5 FL.UM - Plannin, I PRICE AIU'TOIV ABIT HOLDINGS KEYLARGO CANVAS � f I � IMMM Vie,, i u i LARGO, CARGO E ��,uu �DEE ��II,I Mlll E . Er ur;abon ��������������������������������������� is�I I iA:����_��rr��•�Y����f�I �-a ,��i�, �:����,����: 6 The commercial properties across the highway are also much larger parcels and are ALL WATERFRONT. You can't have a Marina or a Beachfront Resort on a few tiny dry lots. There is absolutely no comparison to Mr. Thompson's 5 lots in a Residential Subdivision, and no justification to convert these 5 lots from Residential to Commercial. 6. "The proposed amendment will not result in an adverse change in community character..." Once again, over 230 nearby residents strongly disagree as evidenced by the petition, and their attendance here today. I am baffled by the conclusion of the DRC and Monroe County Planning Staff to "Recommend" approval of the proposed amendment when I see no argument or justification for recommendation. Rather what they have discussed is support for "We have no objection to the approval of this recommendation." I also see no argument or objection for denial, which would leave the parcels in Residential use. Please deny this application. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, David King 411 3rd St Key Largo, FL 33037 305-916-5446 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 3:11 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number:J6, 2023-1909 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI L%vuL .yy (3allcwd, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO 7WE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. 0 Please c.on,idor the ervironrrront when 4�0 deciding whether to print this oma:aiL From: Dave King<davidjking@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, December 7, 2023 5:43 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDIS5@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number:J6, 2023-1909 1 You don't often get email from davidiking@aol.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear Commissioners, While reviewing the agenda for the BOCC meeting on December 13, I saw the above mentioned item regarding ABIT Holdings, and want to provide a few comments. While this application to reserve 10 Affordable Housing ROGO Allocations comes as no surprise, I would like to suggest you rearrange your agenda to address the proposed Zoning change (item Pl) before item J6. Here's why: In the event that you Reserve these 10 ROGO Allocations for 12 months and then find reason to deny the proposed Zoning change for ABIT Holdings, the County will be unable to issue these ROGO Allocations for Affordable Housing at some other location until probably 2025. Also, by reserving these allocations for property that is not properly zoned for them, the Board gives the impression that you have already decided to approve the Zoning change, even before the Hearing. That might suggest some impropriety or that due process is not SOP in Monroe County. Just my two cents worth. Sincerely, David King 411 3rd St Key Largo, FL 33037 305-916-5446 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 3:12 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Agenda Item Number P1, 2023-1570 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI Lindsey Ballard Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544(Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov https://gcc02.safeI i n ks.protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http%3A/2F%2Fwww.mon roecou nty- fl.gov%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ceyongue%40monroe- clerk.com%7C2d62c67571784fc4032408d bf829e28d%7C5e7638e7dcd b4069afa5946880d021f1%7CO%7CO%7C6383766 31051877514%7CU nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWljoi MC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV2luMzl i LCJ BTi161 klhaWwi LCJXVC16Mn 0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BD8n9hOQbGg8CD4wvdUgl l NvXgypf9B9o18EOH%2Fom4s%3D&reserved=0 Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated" Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY REGARDING COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECTTO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Arnhold <arnholdranch@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 6:21 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDISS@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov> Subject:Agenda Item Number P1, 2023-1570 [You don't often get email from arnholdranch@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification j i CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Please consider the safety of using Avenue B as an entrance to a commercial complex! This intersection is nuts already and I know better than most since I live on this corner. All of you know as well as everyone else the traffic has increased dramatically since the traffic study being used was done six years ago- and it received a very poor score then! This decision is about the greed of one man who doesn't even live in the neighborhood versus the safety many men women and children of a close knit neighborhood as well as Key Largo as a whole. Please consider the scores of other property owners for whom their homes represent a huge portion if not all of their life's work and savings, all of whom bought their homes in a residential not mixed use village. Don't let greed rule this decision - please make the fair and right call and keep these lots zoned residential only. Sincerely, Thomas Duncan Arnhold,Jr. (239) 641-3553 121 1st Terrace Key Largo FI 33037 arnholdranch@yahoo.com Gretchen Garrett (903) 267-5579 121 1St Terrace Key Largo FL 33037 gretchen.garrettl@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 8:00 AM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 FYI Lindsey Ballard Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544(Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov https://gcc02.safeI i n ks.protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http%3A/2F%2Fwww.mon roecou nty- fl.gov%2F&data=05%7CO2%7Ceyongue%40monroe- clerk.com%7Ca7592blf9ad0481332c508d bfa4910ad%7C5e7638e7dcd b4069afa5946880d021f1%7C0%7C0%7C6383789 63977997917%7CU nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWljoi MC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV2luMzl i LCJ BTi161 klhaWwi LCJXVC16Mn 0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=N rMCp%2FjH bnhiyMkSWvkuOQzBWubxg9kFl hWAh08EbvE%3D&reserved=0 Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated" Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY REGARDING COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECTTO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. -----Original Message----- From: Craig Cross<craigrcross@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 2:23 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDIS5@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov> Subject: Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 [Some people who received this message don't often get email from craigrcross@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification j CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. 1 Dear County Commissioners, I am sure by now you have received numerous emails from Largo Sound Village residents regarding the request by Abit Holdings, LLC to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium (RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial regarding the 5 vacant lots on US1. In November 2019,the Monroe County Planning Commission stated the Key Largo LCP does not support this proposed change. They voted 4-1 to deny the application. The Planning Commission thought this proposal was a bad idea and would set a bad precedent. Both my wife and 1, as homeowners in this community 20+years,trusted their integrity, knowledge, and professionalism when they made that decision. We pray you will also! Please deny this application. Thank you for your consideration. God's Blessings be with you all. Most Respectfully, Craig R. Cross 108 1st Street Key Largo, FL 33037 (305) 393-9177 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 8:00 AM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 FYI Lindsey Ballard Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544(Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov https://gcc02.safeI i n ks.protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http%3A/2F%2Fwww.mon roecou nty- fl.gov%2F&data=05%7CO2%7Ceyongue%40monroe- clerk.com%7C07e12a 16fd9a4382560308d bfa491792%7C5e7638e7dcd b4069afa5946880d021f1%7CO%7CO%7C6383789 64072843502%7CU nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWljoi MC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV2luMzl i LCJ BTi161 klhaWwi LCJXVC16Mn 0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RGTsH F%2BX6Ri DDvq HORruu PkaV9U U I PSchsogpxXZNSE%3D&reserved=0 Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated" Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY REGARDING COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECTTO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. -----Original Message----- From: susan <cross.keys@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 1:58 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDISS@ Mon roeCou nty-FL.Gov> Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear County Commissioners, 1 I am sure by now you have received numerous emails from Largo Sound Village residents regarding the request by Abit Holdings, LLC to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium (RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial regarding the 5 vacant lots on US1. In November 2019,the Monroe County Planning Commission stated the Key Largo LCP does not support this proposed change. They voted 4-1 to deny the application. The Planning Commission thought this proposal was a bad idea and would set a bad precedent. Both my husband and 1, as homeowners in this community 20+years,trusted their integrity, knowledge, and professionalism when they made that decision. We pray you will also! Please deny this application. Thank you for your consideration. Most Respectfully, Susan J. Cross 108 1st Street Key Largo, FL 33037 (305) 393-9237 Sent from my iPad 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 8:01 AM To: County Commissioners and Aides Cc: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Agenda Item P1,2023-1570 Attachments: LSV 2023.pages FYI L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,dder the environrrrent wwlien 4�0 0"1111 deciding hetl'ier to print this erra:�iL From: Katherine Urban <kathypashaurban@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 2:49 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject:Agenda Item P1,2023-1570 You don't often get email from katliXpashiaiarbari@gryiail.com. Learn why this is important 1 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Ms. Ballard, I attach my opposition to the approval of P1, 2023-1570, due to be discussed at the BOCC meeting and Public Hearing meeting scheduled for December 13, in Key Largo. My information is as follows. Katherine Urban 520 Sound Dr. Key Largo, Florida 305 903-3243 kgthygashaurban@ mail.com 2 December 10, 2023 My name is Katherine Urban. My residence is located at 520 Sound Drive in Key Largo Florida. My phone number is 305 903-3243. My email address is Kathypashaurban@gmail.com. I write in opposition to the approval of Public Hearing Agenda Item Number P1 , 2023-1570 which is scheduled for discussion at your meeting on December 13, 2023. It proposes to rezone five parcels of land (part of Largo Sound Village) from residential to mixed commercial use. While I have concerns on a variety of topics such a change would negatively impact, I would like to focus on Public Safety and Crime. Crime rates tend to be higher in commercially zoned districts. The rates do vary based on the type of commercial business, but the proposed change does not in any way prohibit that a liquor or convenience store, restaurant/bar, storage units, pawn shop, gun shop or other types of businesses with higher crime risks would not take residence in the commercial spaces. Most specifically pointed out in articles on this subject are increased robberies and assault. This potentially impacts not only residents in close proximity, but the entire community. While there are commercial businesses directly across the Overseas Highway on the Southbound side, they are tourist based in nature and don't back up to residential neighborhoods. We are separated on the northbound side by four travel lands and a median. Another public safety concern is our school bus stop located on the Overseas Highway at the southern corner of the land parcels on Avenue B. The bus stop is centrally located in the community for walkability purposes with no logical area to relocate. A sharp increase in daily trips associated with commercial property would make an already challenging intersection unsafe. Much of the justification to change the zoning seems to center around providing affordable housing units as part of the development of this land. I see this as a convenient guise to clear the path for commercial development and the resulting ongoing revenues. The 2020 census average per capita income in Key Largo doesn't even qualify for one of the affordable housing complexes that I checked. Our problem is that affordable housing isn't affordable. Private or corporate development of affordable housing seems to benefit the developers and landlords. There must be a better way. Despite any promises made or commitments made at the upcoming hearing, there are no guarantees if this change is approved. In the end, if you support this change, you won't be solving any problems, you won't be making anything better. You will be supporting a gentleman that acquired property knowing full well how it was zoned. He proceeded and that was his personal decision to make, not ours to pay the consequences for. Our lovely established neighborhood will pay the price. I ask that you reject this proposal and keep the land purely residential as part of Largo Sound Village. Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 8:01 AM To: County Commissioners and Aides Cc: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: FYI L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,dder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding whether to print this erra:�iL From: Kathy Klock<kathyklockemail@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 12:56 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: You don't often get email from katliyklockemail@aryiail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. 1 I write to you as a taxpayer of Monroe County and a resident of Key Largo, to support the continued denial of the Applications to change the Land Use District Map (File Number 2019-028) and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM File 2019-029). The land is currently zoned residential and was zoned residential when the Applicant purchased the property. The property is located in an area of very heavy traffic on U.S. 1 which already creates unsafe conditions at times. The access and egress to 1st Street on Avenue A already creates a traffic challenge as it is only feet away from U.S. 1. If the application is granted, the traffic resulting from commercial development will not only cause a dangerous situation on Avenue B, it will cause danger to passing drivers on U.S. 1 because traffic turning into Avenue B to access the property will necessarily back up on U.S 1. The resiidents on 1 st Street will simply be trapped. It will be impossible for them to get out of their street. In addition, if any development on the subject property, other than the 5 residential properties that are permitted, is added, safe conditions for drivers, pedestrians, and bicycle riders could not exist. The neighborhood of Largo Sound Village is populated by many, many children, and as it is, you must be very careful and drive below the posted speed limit to avoid endangering a child on a bicycle or on foot. Adding more density to this area is also not in the best interest of the County. There is ample commercial activity on the west side of U.S. 1, and no need for any additional retail activity in the area. It certainly cannot be justified in light of the unsafe conditions that cannot be remedied that such development would create. Further, commercial development would not add to the aethestics to visitors to the Keys. A reasonable residential build would be attractive, and certainly more attractive than more commercial development. 5 residences that could 2 house teachers, firemen, or policemen would not create unsafe conditions and would serve the community. Denial of the applications serves the County's interests. It is not prejudicial to the property owner because the current zoning existed when he purchased it. I hope you will support the safety and other interests of the Largo Sound Village community and all of our beautiful County by maintaining the denial of the applications. Sincerely, Kathy M. block 604 Island Drive Key Largo, Florida 33037 4UP Virus-free. ,;;ava. s c c..)rl'! I write to you as a taxpayer of Monroe County and a resident of Key Largo, to support the denial of the Applications to change the Land Use District Map (File Number 2019-028) and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM File 2019-029). The land is currently zoned residential and was zoned residential when the Applicant purchased the property. The property is located in an area of very heavy traffic on U.S. 1 which already creates unsafe conditions at times. The access and egress to 1st Street on Avenue A already creates a traffic challenge as it is only feet away from U.S. 1. If the application is granted, the traffic resulting from commercial development will not only cause a 3 dangerous situation on Avenue B, it will cause danger to passing drivers on U.S. 1 because traffic turning into Avenue B to access the property will necessarily back up on U.S 1. The resiidents on 1 st Street will simply be trapped. It will be impossible for them to get out of their street. In addition, if any development on the subject property, other than the 5 residential properties that are permitted, is added, safe conditions for drivers, pedestrians, and bicycle riders could not exist. The neighborhood of Largo Sound Village is populated by many, many children, and as it is, you must be very careful and drive below the posted speed limit to avoid endangering a child on a bicycle or on foot. Adding more density to this area is also not in the best interest of the County. There is ample commercial activity on the west side of U.S. 1, and no need for any additional retail activity in the area. It certainly cannot be justified in light of the unsafe conditions that cannot be remedied that such development would create. Further, commercial development would not add to the aethestics to visitors to the Keys. A reasonable residential build would be attractive, and certainly more attractive than more commercial development. 5 residences that could house teachers, firemen, or policemen would not create unsafe conditions and would serve the community. Denial of the applications serves the County's interests. It is not prejudicial to the property owner because the current zoning existed when he purchased it. I hope you will support the safety and other interests of the Largo Sound Village community and all of our beautiful County by denying the applications. Sincerely, Kathy M. block 604 Island Drive Key Largo, Florida 33037 4UP Virus-free. ,;;ava. s c c..)rl'! Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 8:02 AM To: County Commissioners and Aides Cc: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Agenda P1 FYI L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,dder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding whether to print this erra:�iL From: Rick<ricksordahl@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 9:15 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject:Agenda P1 You don't often get email from ricksordahl arnail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. 1 Good morning, we are homeowners in Largo Sound Village and are against any zoning change for"agenda 131". It needs to be kept the way it is zoned for 5 single family homes. Largo Sound Village is one of the safest, family friendly communities in Key Largo. This will totally change our community if changed to affordable housing and or commercial properties. PLEASE VOTE NO FOR CHANGING ZONING.... Rick& Dana Sordahl 312-2nd Terrace Key Largo, Florida 33037 208-270-9877 ri_cksco_rdah.C�2g ail.com 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 11:39 AM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: December 13, 2023 Public Hearing Item #P1 and J6 Another one for you L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM TTtE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Pleo e c.on,tlder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding whetl'ier to print this erra iL From:Tracie Rowell <tracierowe1179@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 11:32 AM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3<BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4 <BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5<BOCCDIS5@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: December 13, 2023 Public Hearing Item#P1 and J6 Some people who received this message don't often get email from tracierowe1179@cirnail.corn. Learn why this is important 1 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear Commissioners, Our family reaches out to you today in regards to the upcoming Public Hearing Meeting requesting a land use and zoning change proposal for the vacant property in front of the Largo Sound Village community that is on the docket for December 13th in Key Largo. Item # P1 and J6. David Thompson aka Abit Holdings. As you may know, a proposal was presented to the Planning Commission on November 19, 2019 and it was voted 4 to 5 in opposition of the proposed land use change. We are writing to you today to ask you to uphold that vote and please consider the voices of the residents that this land use change would affect. We oppose the land use change for the following reasons: First, when Mr. Thompson purchased the property in 2013 he was well aware of the residential zoning as it had been for the 20 years prior to that purchase. His request to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map designation from "RM" to "MC" for 5 "RM" lots that are a part of Largo Sound Village community comes as a desire to increase his own profit, not as a hardship. Allowing this change sets a VERY dangerous precedent that will undeniably cause a domino effect throughout the entire US HWY 1 corridor. I fear what would happen to other residential zoned green spaces that are privately owned once they learn the land use can be changed, just because they want to, and they look to sell to the highest commercial bidder creating a large impact on our environment and the character of the Keys. Second, the proposed land use change would likely need an entrance to the property from Ave B. This intersection of Ave B, US HWY 1 and 1 st Street is already difficult to maneuver because of the limited visual sight due to a curve in the road on Ave B before it joins with US1 and the sharp angle of where 1 st Street meets US HWY 1. Having more vehicle and pedestrian traffic at that intersection would be a hazardous change that would increase the density of traffic in an already strained intersection. In conclusion we, along with the majority of our neighbors, are strongly opposed to the negative impacts more commercial volume would bring to our neighborhood. More commercial development would not enhance the neighborhood. It would increase traffic, noise, and potentially even crime. We live in a quiet, safe community. Zoning is used to prevent new development from interfering with the existing uses and preserve the character of a community. We ask that you also strongly consider and listen to the voices of the residents who live in the Largo Sound Village who are ultimately the ones affected by such a change and weigh that accordingly. Please save Largo Sound Village. Thank you for your time. Lucas and Tracie Rowell 240 2nd Road Key Largo, FL 33037 305-814-7288 �� c.0 �2w .. _ .0 70 �. .:c a�r Public Hearing December 13,2023 Agenda Item: P1&J6 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 3:28 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 FYI. L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO 7WE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Pleo e c.on,dder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding hetl'ier to print this erra:�iL From: Monica Ann Szabo <szabomonica739@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 2:40 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS5 <BOCCDIS5@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: BOCC mtg Agenda Item Number: P1, 2023-1570 Some people who received this message don't often get email from szabomonica739(@J)mail.com. Learn why this is important 1 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear County Commissioners, I am sure by now you have received numerous emails from Largo Sound Village residents regarding the request by Abit Holdings, LLC to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium (RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial regarding the 5 vacant lots on US1. We would like to ensure our voice is also heard as a 15 year resident and homeowner in this neighborhood. In November 2019, the Monroe County Planning Commission stated the Key Largo LCP does not support this proposed change. They voted 4-1 to deny the application. The Planning Commission thought this proposal was a bad idea and would set a bad precedent. Both my husband and 1, as homeowners in this community 20+years, trusted their integrity, knowledge, and professionalism when they made that decision. We continue to support and trust that decision and ask that you will also! Please deny this application. Thank you for your consideration. Most Respectfully, Monica A Szabo and Roger Gray 112 1st St Key Largo, Florida 33037 305 896 8252 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 2:15 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Agenda item Number P1, 2023-1575 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Another one for ya. L%vuL .yy (3allcwd, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO 7WE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,dder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding hetl'ier to print this erra:�iL From: Marcy Aultman <marcy@oceanreefclubsir.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 2:19 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Cc: Cates-Craig<Cates-Craig@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS2<boccdis2@monroecounty-fl.gov>; BOCCDIS3 <BOCCDIS3@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>; BOCCDIS4<BOCCDIS4@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject:Agenda item Number P1, 2023-1575 You don't often get email from marcy@ocearireefcliabsir.com. Learn why this is important 1 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. Dear County Commissioners, Regarding the request by Abit Holdings, LLC to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential Medium (RM)to Mixed Use/Commercial with the 5 vacant lot on US 1, 1 would like to give my opinion, as I am sure, is quite similar to most of the residents in Largo Sound Village. 4 years ago, the Monroe County Planning Commission stated the Key Largo LCP does not support this proposed change. They voted 4-1 to deny the application as they decided it was not in the best interest of the community and it would set a bad precedent. Spot on! My husband and I have lived in Largo Sound Village for 26 years and have valued the Leadership of the County Commissioners. Please let us value your's. This decision will be your Legacy. Please deny this application. Thank you, Marcy Aultman 114 1st St Key Largo, FL 33037 305-522-0582 Ocean Reef Sotheby's Club INTERNATIONAL REALTY Marcy Aultman I Sales Associate Ocean Reef Club Sotheby's International Realty 35 Ocean Reef Drive, Suite 120 I Key Largo, FL 33037 o: 305.367.2027 1 c: 305.522.0582 1 f: 305.367.2032 mair .yC oc. airvee..(clubsi.ir.core. I oceair...iree cf..0 kss�ir. . r . e .._rr11y.0/ic) c_ 2 Liz Yongue From: Ballard-Lindsey <Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 4:12 PM To: Liz Yongue Subject: FW: Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 13, 2023 Agenda Item Number:J6 2023-1909 And another one. L%vuL .yy Ballard, Aide to Roman Gastesi, County Administrator Business Manager-Administration 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 2-205 Key West, FL 33040 (305)292-4443 (Office) (305)393-4442 (Cell Phone) (305)292-4544 (Fax) Courier Stop#1 Ballard-Lindsey@monroecounty-fl.gov www.monroecounty-fl.gov Monroe County, Florida "The Florida Keys" "We may encounter many defeats, but we must not be defeated." Maya Angelou PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD RECORDS LAW. MOST WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM THE COUNTY 2E(�ARDIN COUNTY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA UPON REQUEST. YOUR EMAIL COMMUNICATION MAY BE SUBJECT'TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Please c.on,dder the environrrrent when 4�0 0"1111 deciding whetl'ier to print this erra:�iL From:William Bressie<wbressie@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 3:53 PM To: Ballard-Lindsey<Ballard-Lindsey@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov> Subject: Fwd: Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 13, 2023 Agenda Item Number:J6 2023-1909 You don't often get email from wbressie@esmail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the County. Whether you know the sender or not, do not click links or open attachments you were not expecting. 1 ---------- Forwarded message--------- From:William Bressie ...................... Date: Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:45 PM Subject: Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 13, 2023 Agenda Item Number:J6 2023-1909 To: <ballard-lindse/@monroeCOLAnt f�io >, <b c d.sl monroeCOLAnt -f.....ggv>, <boccc1i.s2fe�.M2.!2.E gj� �j v>, .................................................................y.0........ .y y 2 j� i..........C�2................................................................y.........1 . ....................................... 2 nty <boc d s f c i. 3 e�.M2.!2.E <boccdis4 monroeCOLAnt -f.....ggv>, <boccc1i.sH2.M2.!2.E gj�g�jnty.- v>, fiona deroo ........................................ . ........................................2................................................................y . ....................................... <.J.2D a..d..e..r.Q.Q.C�2gM:qil.com> From: William Bressie & Fiona Deroo Owners of property located in Largo Sound Village at 405 3rd Street & adjacent lot at 407 3rd Street Phone Number: 312-509-5182 email(s): wb.ress.ie.P Ill.com, fignade.roo Ill.co ni ......................................................._,gM�q� ................................ .... ........P ........ ......... To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners I am once again writing in opposition to the requested zoning change outlined in Agenda Item Number J6 2023-1909. If the requestor wanted property for commercial / multi-family uses then they should have purchased property zoned for such uses. The request for this zoning change arises solely from Mr. Thompson's desire to enhance his own revenue opportunities by building more than is allowed. There is no obstruction (geographic or otherwise) that would prohibit the building of 5 single-family homes on the property. The addition of 5 single-family homes would have less impact than the addition of 10 dwelling units and an undefined commercial use. This zoning change would degrade the traffic situation at the intersection of Avenue B and US 1 creating hazard for motorists accessing the neighborhood and more importantly the walkers, bicyclists, joggers, etc. — a group consisting in large part of seniors and children. A key consideration in electing to be a homeowner in Largo Sound Village was the distinct neighborhood feel. Swapping the current residential zoning and allowing commercial uses will in no doubt erode the neighborhood character of the community. We should be able to confidently rely on the consistency afforded by zoning. I am loath to believe that we are willing to impact an entire neighborhood to its detriment because a single property owner believes there is a more profitable use. The property in question has been zoned for single-family residential use for 37 years and was zoned as such when purchased 11 years ago. If the owner's desire was to obtain property for a commercial purpose, then a property zoned for such commercial use should have been purchased. Therefore, I am asking the Board of County Commissioners to DENY approval of the Future and Use Map (FLUM) Amendment Application. This is consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial through PC Resolution P52-19 (November 2019). 1 believe this also to be consistent with Goal 101 of The Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which states- "Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources." 2 Thank you 3 P I I We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other,look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic,particularly the corner of Avenue B and'US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B,US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 'E Kt \b,sc., ,, :v14- ' All,----., 41,i.`.7' Z 4•tee Mb li K, 3 j Ck\I 1 C( A 1`3Lv /,-- ,, 4..z.. I V7 iPZ t c_.>� ' 4 - V\cts9 t ► - I.. .. '137 --ye reetfrytli 4?) _1:4 Ilt.a 4 ; 1 ri le-- .7 ..-a .... i 1- ., e rg 'Llfr., ' i.....--- -- - "US e.c-fr exe WO' ifilif r'''.,_.%" 1-1‘2-1 _ /1-'/ (1-fKoe - (, 4107-6,71 i , , k VA4.) r9x ' /474rir-------- 6 Z2- T'stALS Pr /2/1 ( k&r r j/) 0! � � '''`� a �0 7 /ail I'' _ ofJosA) 0,' • , ;Cif 7,ffilli 6922 7sie,i,,,e Dr - le 4' i , 1/3q '944.1Rol r ..1 I - 9-8 r " ed vii.till-i, (44,0b-x I.*-AA------ 17/-i leo leZr 3 -,1°94'6 Y,71 /1--tre JD Al tE 0• dr I) CIS 8 i ki-•01'22_ r Li- 4,g) e / • riitg a O.5- Vc±1.1.1(g_ .4 .D:04 -rn, - ' --,i ,l),e'tie e-kr. 4 Ai, 6A 36C- r's"-/- g A-p- , ,_,.,,,_,,,,,„„,/,id/ ,.......1(Alii,.. I . -A ...' ., At 3e>6_,—.Z._ , el 431/ ��,.� *4J. .._4 . �J 1,/Al iy h _..fir MERIMMIEWMMIS nu , _, -,,,x,e. '41111't1 11Mi aiV 3431P uz:14iTC3idlxl3U RYMkLIW, .a. .aa ,, , :...•.sa —"MINIM • We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file.2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! ,�•.t PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER I - I.'° . ' : ' T- f:- , W/FdbiffitL2t1=Er Pa/6M '''. - : q `'c /arp ; . �; - ' ' • r- . - 43,5 �°�L1 .• r pyr� CO) : 'a /AP ....� ..f -fie , D :,�- ,L S t . 1/3 4.10 0.��g CV' 4 �� .�• - z� ,_:, �-� _/- _ - 3C)c-.q 1 2--- 1 c( /z ... r_i , ,-.,_---------22c ____,--,,,i-- r v.-0-2-c -tid,.. L-7,2 ' 'fc r1es Stec- ctzll--13`-D ! ` v e l ` -we s �� -3 iC> 0 �c.-�d r�s ii 3 • Ailik . _ . , r 414 (ct`''g_ Jitift...-- AL „. : , .N 3z_G- 1-10.51-_, . ,, q` e IN -5D Lt 42,3 i. 3� 1 - � .i.J �.�,i a_ 3os—OC. c-{ -1 z A4,5 - 0 i . s lid ► ,2 .‘11�c -�S`7 --V.,d9 legftiV (') 1/0)) t ,, i,• 7 a,‘ 7 RT7.-- 64-4. v*_,---' (1,,.rr `/.3' i'd--r /Ica _ ..,,- . , 3filir.' . , ki.,-, 1 - i t i -->e.' #44,97 7 5.C---- ,S-Ey---4' ,...., d .k,,,,,,,, ..,---e-----,--- '. - -', , '''i .;,,-i .,..,:- :..;__— - _ if.41 isi-iej 6 '.a.coo gw-i-ed - .:,,,4VNIMPRICALT,PI ,-.13,416i 04 i C2 l C'�'" ' 1v'/l( a c�:ck3 ' ISN - �r82— 78'6 — f 0. We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER i 56A ArO 41 cgrAg� 00c 5 0 . ..,f r, r --,5-ft-f;ce76 .5 a ill We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would.compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 32/ Me.kSA )or n 305 - 3 o6- sip 321 2-2, 3 , , '36 Yz330 ( / /2 z _ . /,1z (4. G 2__L'LtF a> y�� s 'Y � `� �, c> .w._ 40- 17- 7 c - AiNick^ a—INA 3o5-,1“---(C11 el� i, o V27- �° 703— cif IrM.,ad\ ' -,CV, &Inay)# ► f},r, . % —2 qc'-• u 5 S • • We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Villageis a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would.compound the. situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! ,, ...__,E.4....„„teL....F....,,,e PRINT NAME - SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER r ���®®�� Iie CJ �r�� �/ Ill' ,e13- �� 690 1 1 C r<-- P 4,1 tat u ► f�'- a 6 5- if limiA .'' . '' a ,.lit l r " aii FMr /� ' .ice J, r ,S� 6,,E r1L<. 1�i �1�' �:l/[ 1 I -4 _ 6 z, , _- 1< . nre, ...,4„,.„ -:wil_i_i_ii..rt,„..... z:,-... __ _..., ems. , 1... ,.---._ ownemmil ii_- ` _ - i ... - 4*a kik i-,,,,eY P, 4e j a ve 5-00(Alc . . 7/A. d 21— Re: Largo Sound Village - Public Hearing . From: ALVARO DIAGO (alvarodiago@aol.com) To: davidjking@aol.com Date: Monday, October 2, 2023 at 08:45 PM EDT. . Hi David agree to reject such change. . Alvaro Diago . 631 Island Drive Key Largo . May this serve as my signature . Alvaro Diago Sent from my iPhone On Oct 2, 2023, at 9:56 AM, Dave King <davidjking@aol.com>wrote: Hi Folks, Please see the attached Notice.of Public Hearing concerning the 5 vacant lots at the corner of Avenue B and U S.1: David Thompson(ABIT Holdings) has renewed his attempt to have those 5 Residential Lots which are part of the LSV•Subdivision changed to be re-zoned for Mixed.Commercial use, possibly including up to 10 affordable housing units. This process was started in 2019 and 111 dozens of our neighbors attended the Public Hearing at the Murray Nelson Building. We made a good case_and the Planning Commission agreed voting 4-1 to deny the change. This year the Board of County Commissioners has the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, October 18 in MARATHON. This is essentially an appeal of the Planning Commissions denial. Please call and/or.email our Commissioners and request.they reschedule this issue to their December meeting in Key Largo so we can more easily attend and discuss this face to face. • An information hot sheet is attached which includes contact information and links to more information including the minutes of the 2019 Planning.Commission mtg. I suggest reading through that since it lays out the best arguments against this change and offers more info from the Planning Commission and staff. Here is a copy of the email that Joanie sent to the commissioners (mine was much longer, you might have seen it on Facebook).. I know others have already contacted.them- Thank you! . . Dear Commissioners, . . • I would like to request to change the Public Meeting which our hearing will be heard from Marathon, FL to Key•Largo, FL as many of our neighbors may not be computer savvy to. appear by Zoom (I myself would riot be able to set that up). It is also a long drive for our neighbors who are aged or those who work for a living. Key Largo would be easy for them to pop in during the allotted time for this hearing and voice their opinions. Many would We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as Pt Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER1/1& redd6 ci4 liu-6,0 e ko-(7-6 We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 13 olo oc.,k, D \L.e}i‘ v, I 067 �f�n We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other,look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding-traffic,particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use onlyl PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER -tOQflrw A-g< d1,e eze CS('? -C)C7 i '.. R r( A-Rc,,ukec�Jf Z-2. r Ja ,rid -5,�»;� D��n J01/iY'c;o.ite i t c.2._.D. coqOf 1 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 15t Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 0414 .. ' t_ , TZ _ 0Sao '00 tun 7 44za ,r . _mil / _' 5/1--5er- Co/139' 3ii U% / S i ific� P� rZl►S. fe_e icy,41 7)1 1.1 a 637-4tyia, -p„) r\Amoyi s 539 sound... p A-1 iota V%o.) 1 531 �so .Pr. r\y,,,,Sol V' ) * �� _ 6 otz seaw qm, ye) 5-`4' VeI 'j , rn A ?perijs j27 S'esci /3 o�Z- ,.:� 71Th - G'!/`1V �- cry q S 0-71 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! . PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER rr\\'c1 71)i I.L (' Qvi 5 2c• Ltf) r S 2O Lund # — 1 'SzkYitook_ (� ®ki lt- goy N ts---eff, 531 QP., �►C 1 Q L-ctRuLt frtLeA - 5-3-9 Sa cAncA I We,the undersigned homeowners and reside.nts of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other,look out for one another and help each Other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic,particularly the comer of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous inter-sera-ion as 1' Street meets Avenue B,US land the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the Jive lots u• !er consideration should be maintained for residential use onlv! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER j . '�and residents of Largo Sound We, the undersigned homeowners the Land Use Village, are opposed to the applications to change FLUM, District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors and help each other. each other, look out for one another know There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous inte rsection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1_ and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under con id-• ation sheu be maintained for resi ent' 1 use o ly j / re001s :. ,:3r... .a.., �. PRINT NAME i..; SIGNA HOUSE NUMBER ',MOM?liken ViNgethANNERWSNIGMEMINI. • • • We, the undersigned homeowners' and residents of Largo Sound • opposed to the applications to change the Land Use Village, are FLUM, District Map file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map file 2019-029). Largo Sound Vil lage e is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly th e corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous interse ction as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only• PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER ,2 FliZ.s!q� kb '" :�'4)_: ,'' 6; .'e c,��il a1Fk a�VP4 W too t" I n; i Mi R.i m ipS. • We, the undersigned homeown ers and residents of Largo Sound • opposed to the applications to change the Land Use Village, are FLUM, District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map file 2019-029). neighbors Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where and help each oth each other, look out for one another know er. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersec tion as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1.. and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintaine for residents 1 use only!air CL1EFILIATR"salter Zrilik‘c.5 Peet PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE N MBER Y•s�and residents of Largo Sound We, the undersigned homeowners' • opposed to the applications to change the Land Use Village, are p FLUM, District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map file 2019-029). g Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growingsafety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection ction as Pt Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path al l in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! O�l•� 6:. . 1 vs ue . ..{A eP Act4 PRI NT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 4/5 /c/- i�0J minagegsonwetw ih,,,,wo_u[Itlk M'E,1,4,t A6r.'4c,,,��,�.m��,TUS 4,y ?jnypi�I".uu904uMrUV • sidents te undersigned h:1ZE , ae, are opposed t 0 ) file 2019-029). • close-knit community Largo Sound Village is a where neighbors helpeach other. know each other, look out for one another and particularly There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, Th the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus sto and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous inte rsection as 1st Street reet meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same loc ation. We think the addition of commercial and highdensityhousing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only E K-L* E L—ANILI ioN2 V.�u�us�:�W��..J.��.l�+.�c.�i�...�...�:L...�r..,�::s,..v..10,44 1. V Ri ..rs:..Y..z�"•�'+ �r —s--`^ � k�r PRINT NAME SIGN HOUSE NUMBER s„ g-C1. '�rr�1'#.�'n,�4t''y��ris,l�'i iu p l °ivtw"N114 tlw : .�� ~ 1 We, the undersign ed homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1s` Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! 'Putt* RosAkftio !magma _" p,00 � PRINT NAME SIG NAT URE HOUSE NUMBER .r 5 We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGN,4J RE HOUSE NUM : R •a Sr- rvowe r dll. V a 1: a {, rs�and • We, the undersigned homeowners residents of Largo Sound •to change the Land Use Village, are opposed to the applications Map (FLUM, District Map file 2019-028) and Future Land Use file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. particularly are growing safety concerns regardingtraffic, p y the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous in tersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1. and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use o 1 i • • .S9 ;�iMin.yFu+4iyn.�Rz1 Ee ..•+'f1.55, " .:,�: k • ..:"a:t�N PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER \ 0 1%?-cco sf &3037 r 1 We, the undersigned homeowners'and residents of Largo Sound • Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential useonly! -4110.01:1 +�tii�^+�'7u133�a i �r ,:,�"x,w /�p� r au� "' � � 8 xl4ix "'�'a��y C."N,x,V� �,° PRINT N ME SIGNATU HOUSE NUMBER , ,,,,„ ",w'I F k x%Wrp'�'"�Xi." �'�lul y A.4I Yr". kl �� . -7 We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration sho ld be maintained for residential use only! TO ' ' 0 e-f( / , PRINT NAME SIGNATURE` HOUSE NUMBER We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under 'deration should be maintained for r- . - - se only! mak ,,r2 ),4 44, PRINT i AME SIGNA4JRE OU :. i UMBER ,M1 We, the undersign ed homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as Pt Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for reside tia. _- 1 ! mn w 4'GE•iP'.Wnn h®NI,„„„lAfl I m,.U,e iry ^idiu..m47, NON. I "U � PRINT NAME M' HOUSE NUMBER s-\,-eet w.","uviH emna m wra,m a i Fiat tl.!i, m !l Mar:_a ' ^ 4 rsi ned homeowners' We, the undersigned and residents of Largo Sound g Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as ls` Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! iiimearigYRJAP �'!tl1�9"' k l u".,�i, PRINT NAME S IGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER ,I 67 5 We, the unde rsigned ned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as Pt Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! GJ •e n ,I'^'.. V �� PRINT NAME � SI A TURE, mvxk HOUSE NUMBER g We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound • Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! cXA/6- .,.'T'_ ' r, "..''"''a.: PRINT NAME GNATURE HOUSE NUMBER We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1s` Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residents, use only! / $ , .mrm*)—)etYY SIGNAT �f E PRINT NA E HOUSE NUMBER l 0 st 54 .E F : We, the unde rsigned ned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound " Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as Pt Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! bC21. w.. W� b N rui PRINT NAME SIGAi RE HOUSE NUMBER 70 t t �and residents of Largo Sound We, the undersigned homeownersto chan e the Land Use Village, are opposed to the applications g District Map (FLUM, (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly g g the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under ' consideration should be maintained for resi ential use only! ni,7Y+r4rt"k:« tiar.+d.F-i 5zr nara.nvrrr. v�,n,*,a� rilaT ZTj 11 ii!"lOLE1=9 5'P'..'''�'M.T t.'.:, '.d1 a;hi f�q i PRINT NAME • SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER •F •.F We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound • Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another ther and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only12.449 r rdyv u,e.a iuuuYnr �LIVa armi+ "dN"' 4I/iYi —. ii"I.tll i � �� I�I��'� PRI NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER i// / ,1 We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1 s` Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME NATURE HOUSE NUMBER We, the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM, file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1" Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! ou.aAik 136314...a 5 ill%.9. i,opg.i��tira� � 'N�o^,!��',duu m� u °"���.����m �r1,4 r PRINT NAME RE HOUSE NUMBER 2-6 OrkIWIP,��� �� 4 rrliii9di 4411 , .w. We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other,look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five to under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! /I/ ...E_A„-n___4,---e____Q, PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER SbA SPIN 6o P7PY I faiv V l.2® /Jt 1''rrace Jo Pd - ` .) 9\ 3 1-.ri .�.r AO a 1 sl— rer .c_., C k vL s (<-e r- _ -6--t °c.___ ( i r i sr '�:e r�" C1-1-(Li c ale G L., S�� I I` Is'am -~� 11� ) Prf t/ _ 4-t- A,, C- vo-34 .L s Z.. --�'iro�C 0 T c- /�j 61�� ��i 4�vr d'G1'Icy 1 k - 1 �c !�®�,�`/'�i. dmicr () cc tv ( ' �5 316 t c f kcr 6cif cii- "(c:'P'r, : . 3 I4' 2-12 t f fc c,� it Li 14 ote 1 it. „ , i/5-15/ ,re,67e(6e r nk 34- "wee 11 i 1.,), i/57 t J.--;!.t..,-4,c..-e , (-- .4- - --41L.aft'------7--- C.. aii .---&.(-0.,sk-..estv e,. _ u 0 s-i----pi,r-r-Qd._-e_ r a a C't IIS i° eIrtoe l sr --/e r. i ilarict) AAdil,‘ ' 51 /06 isr re( z� ID -57 M /r 4� �� 19:) Y. ' --- I on / r-e- ° el 6 '' . I- -,teae.4 C c:��S am- ��� /Q0 .-� ii i Ctn ,I1 r t�c� � , , 10 S T-�„v,r-a cue, #i 4AI Oro /.'e).r ii 7 /$ -7' rrix, :, !-kuvw o.(o w or a" 113 r ff -t- Tc r4((: 1-1- 1 toVii)5ON 11044.7 P — /0 7ri ffaoii, v �/ L JrA �411 L.e is 1.l c't r t_le C{of(e Lu_Ltrt n ce4,1 .Ae-A .,,ir�i) * _--�' .2/' - 4 L We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know.each other,look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 15t Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! S� . '"e" PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER 7-1 CM t�c r o ✓ �Z�:.c c.c�e�, /i) - / 5T 1 e . We the urn lersi;:. : i. homeowners and reside€Is of La,::o Sound Village,are opposed to tr appiicatio,is to ch.. F:.e the Land Use District Map(file 20 28)and Future Land Use Map(FLUMe lie 2019-029). La,;o Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each otters look out for one another and help each ither. There are or,;,idg safety concerns regarding tra cb pa ;Ccularlythe corner of/venue a and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is,.already a dangerous intersection as Street meets &venuel.,US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. tJf- u, ink the addition'of commercial and high tr c•nsiJ housing in this area would compound the situation. We there,s re ink that the five lots under consideration should;. main :ined for residential tial use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER • I II I I { n I � t I , I , ,I 1 I We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo-Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other,look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 151 Street meets Avenue B,US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER //Wier /&ae/27/g4 r i� 7 rviAec r ,ems- eJ � � a,3 '3 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 15t Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! aG PRINT NAME „SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER . C .r 14#(44:t 17 nag ah, cx1 • We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNA URE HOUSE NUMBER 1111 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1"Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER r Elneve I Roj ewcK; P,"1 5' 211d RA We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would.compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! 2 ''' d ,CXce.,--Z--' PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER `14Sian . t.B eon L . r' (_ l 9 , m 6-4 C , - i ,,ed.,_,___ A --"A.__,c-- 2 I ..5 ' i.-,,,(1 ‘ 1- Leteri -f /4", - ' ' ' 'rj-tc-e--r---C__ ,v4„ ir -2.- 3 7- -04,7 -57/991:4 ilki.:,-77- .41_A .;.z-/- _ s,/,,4 ID?"etke I)°46 Scii;;L: Q4 --� 21 i 2Ad Sq- L. 6 Z..Lie S% .. -- sE Fe/ 2 -0 zaf..x."-- , � ter' .__ -,,,,..,,,J..,,,,,--- , ,, ,.a Z ' - ' J ,-- - va Li- J'Ut . J/ . . Z,1 s14 7 Le-op0 o rr 't.F-C.e' I_ z iveG Vtti 5.fi'-oCA 4 ,r=�- L4-hif' _. ?14- --- e1-` ,,,, re,,,,qcoi, ., - ci zi-J-cf-r-c-1-- . Re: Largo Sound Village - Public Hearing From: wondergirlfriday (wondergirlfriday@gmail.com) To: davidjking@aol.com Cc: keylargobarry@gmail.com; wondergirlfriday@gmail.com Date: Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:08 PM EDT Hi Dave, We are on an RV trip in Utah through October. Will you please sign our names to the petition in the following way: Kathleen S. Miller and Barry L. Carter 221 2nd St, Key Largo, FL 33037 > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 7:45 AM Dave King <davidjking@aol.com wrote: Hi Folks, Please see the attached Notice of Public Hearing concerning the 5 vacant lots at the corner of Avenue B and U.S.1 . David Thompson (ABIT Holdings) has renewed his attempt to have those 5 Residential Lots which are part of the LSV Subdivision changed to be re-zoned for Mixed Commercial use, possibly including up to 10 affordable housing units. This process was started in 2019 and dozens of our neighbors attended the Public Hearing at the Murray Nelson Building. We made a good case and the Planning Commission agreed 1 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is.already.a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGN.,TURE HOUSE NUMBER , ii... iti,f, . 1 . ( _ji) ' • ' .� S'ar ��!d . ! ___ _i) 2 " rr c i aifi (4 Yr;FA ' Illi,3 ' iaef,t i4 4k.4-19Li4:c4i 2 t d ' , " ''' ,C) 'Ni11.1.-1 aN-1(.,C , , _ - 3c1,1 2_,,,e,1 re___Ar XI iVIVt/- _ ,/\ til ���ft 1. _ _ __'�tee'_ z/ot Y �p Z/�/�-.� —4 ©es c.,,b. it fir-, p(- / • '"- /0 2-4 i %,�.R i( — , -.C--X&W 3,10 _.2._ trgr..41-e--e— , %NU kY (.1013( * , , 3 i t c) _Net,t 6'aMkis L 31 Lii &, -Ji Y- 1 tValL,....-\\ I I V-M.,,,,, . .......-- 3 0‘46 ),ef`e 1-6--/- e-h-{....6e4i, 1414ri-444-1- l' -- ',.-i: !:-/(,, „,,,,,, .-__ti, -3/ a-i -, -,,, ._,,,,. We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map(file 2019-028)and Future Land Use Map(FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only'! / (27,' PRINT NAME SIGN T . ,E HOUSE NUMBER l ,114St74-R ,.���"t 12C:4 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village,are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in.this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! F• -/ /3:4 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER L__a �- 3 We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file 2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029). Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street meets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! 2. /2 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER ‘1,7 AAP I 17t" *0,..•_ 7‘• A a Vr 9 f r 9 ANY r c/,S scAs We,the undersigned homeowners and residents of Largo Sound Village, are opposed to the applications to change the Land Use District Map (file,2019-028) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM,file 2019-029),. Largo Sound Village is a close-knit community where neighbors know each other, look out for one another and help each other. There are growing safety concerns regarding traffic, particularly the corner of Avenue B and US 1 where there is a public bus stop and a school bus stop. This is already a dangerous intersection as 1st Street mpets Avenue B, US 1 and the bike path all in the same location. We think the addition of commercial and high density housing in this area would compound the situation. We therefore think that the five lots under consideration should be maintained for residential use only! PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HOUSE NUMBER - • l0 3 — pp z�r it)/L c3 (4111%.11AC- itkk," le- 4fi _ � �11- f 'Y �- 4 03 v S t KK��' �+ '. 3 -%1.1), --"r Transmittal of an Ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Designation from Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC) on property located at 103925, 103935) 103945) 103955 and 103965 Overseas Highway, Key Largo Applicant: Abit Holdings, LLC BOCC Meeting: December 13, 2023 Staff: Devin Tolpin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner; and Cheryl Cioffari, AICP, Assistant Directorof Planning ��tiyr Subject Property 103925, 103935, 103945, 103955, 103965 Overseas Highway, Key Largo r /rii iy �yf r r/i I I II( u! r n I b mi Proposed FLUM '�%% i�'l�'ID � rri; ;, ';/r�,1 % ,f d,�FYI � ,✓ CF;;,,, �ID�Y/"� ����, ' ;% ��: "rg viV�„"/� �" , �;tr, ji„� ������ "�� l� �� ;���'� %%a -" ;,; UI "�� r, ,;, � ' � %°m yg��ffP�'X�il %/�,,,✓ r/ / I 1 ✓, r �, %; �piPd�d % / l �„ (1,; i r � eo /' ��' 1 / , ' �� rYIYI➢; l�/ �, � , t ,, »✓„ �ii�� ,,, / l � r, � i � cur, �`/1 I �r,/ Maximum Development Potential by Land Use District(Zoning)and Future Land Use Map Designation LNistingFLUM/Zoning Type Adopted Standards Development Potential Residential Medium(RM) Market Rate Allocated Density 1.0 du/lot 5 do Improved Subdivision(IS) T DR/Market Rate Residential Max Net Detvsiry 0 0 du Gross Upland Area:5 Lots (31,115 sf/0.714 acres) Buildable Acres:0.571 Affordable Residential Max Net Density 0 0du Transient Allocated Density 0 0 du Nonresidential Uses 0 0 sf Proposed FLUM/Zoning Type Adopted Standards Development Potential Market Rate Allocated Density 3.0 du/acre(SC) 2.14 du Mixed Use Commercial(MC) SuburbanCommercial(SC) TDR/Market Rate Residential MaxNetDensity 6.0 du/buildable acre(SC) 3.42du Gross Upland Area:31,115 sf/0.714 acres Buildable Acre:0.571 Affordable Residential MaxNetDensity 18.0 du/buildable acre(SC) 10.29du T ransient Allo sated Density 10-2 5 rooms/spaces/acre 7-17 rooms/spaces Nonresidential Uses 0.10-0.45FAR 3,111 sf-14,001 sf Net Change in Development Potential ofproperty Type Net Change based on FLUM&LUD Amendment Market Rate A1locatedDensity -2.86 du T DR/Market Rate Residential Max Net Density +3.42 du Affordable Residential Max Net Density +10.29 du TransientAllocated Density +17 rooms/spaces Nonresidential Uses +14,001 sf Staff W)7 Staff recommends APPROVAL of transmittal of the proposed FLUM amendment from Residential Medium (RM) to Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC) for property located at located at 103925, 1039357 1039457 103955 and 103965 Overseas Highway, Key Largo.