Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item K4
K4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY of MONROE �� i Mayor Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5 The Florida Keys Mayor Pro Tern James K.Scholl,District 3 Craig Cates,District 1 Michelle Lincoln,District 2 ' David Rice,District 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting January 31, 2024 Agenda Item Number: K4 2023-1981 BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Planning & Environmental Resources TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of a Resolution Prioritizing the Transportation Alternatives Applications Submitted for the Florida Department of Transportation- 2024 Transportation Alternatives Grant Program for Projects To Be Funded in the FDOT Tentative Work Program for FY2030. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") announced the 2022 Transportation Alternatives ("TA") application cycle on November 6th, 2023. The TA is federal funding available for non- motorized transportation that is administered through the FDOT. The current application cycle was open until December 6th, 2023. As part of the application review process, the FDOT requires local priority rankings to be approved by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (`BOCC"). This year five applications were received for projects within Monroe County: Wickers Realignment Construction, City of Key West; Crane Blvd Shared Use Path, Monroe County;Aviation Blvd. Path Lighting, City of Marathon; Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Improvements, City of Key Colony Beach; and Sombrero Beach Rd Path Mitigation, City of Marathon.A selection committee, consisting of representatives from Monroe County, Key West, Marathon, and Key Colony Beach, evaluated the applications based on the criteria found within the FDOT application. Criteria for scoring the projects included: I. Project safety improvements for bicycles riders and/or pedestrian. 2. Intermodal transportation linkages improvements, including those that provide access to transit stations and/or facilities. 3. Mobility enhancement or community development for disadvantaged groups (i.e. children, the elderly, the poor, those with limited transportation options, and the disabled). 4. Local funding contribution or the completion of previous phases of project development. 5. Neighborhood or community quality of life improvements, improving environmental air, noise, water quality, and/or reducing the need for single occupancy vehicle trips. 6. Community support, including minutes of public meetings, newspaper clippings, petitions, letters 2708 of support from local business owners, property owners, nonprofit organizations, political leaders and other groups. 7. Prioritization (25 points): Monroe County will prioritize projects and award points based on prioritization. A maximum of 25 points will be assigned. The top ranked project from each county agency receives 25 points, the second ranked receives 24 points, the third ranked receives 23 points, etc. The overall score is based on a 125-point scale. Each committee member scored each project based on the six criteria listed above, assigning points as allowed for each measure. This accounted for 100 points. In accordance with criteria number seven, the Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department Senior Director assigned the remaining 25 prioritization points. The total scores from each committee member based on the six criteria were averaged and the final score for number seven assigned by the Senior Director was then added to the individual scores from each committee member. The City of Marathon Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting Addition received an overall average score of 86.8 and a final score of 111.8 with final prioritization points; City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity received an overall average score of 78 and a final score of 102 with final prioritization points; City of Marathon Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path received an overall average score of 71.5 and a final score of 94.5 with final prioritization points; City of Key West Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan received an overall average score of 70 and a final score of 92 with final prioritization points; and City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, Invasive Species removal received an overall average score of 65.3 and a final score of 86.3 with final prioritization points. The recommended rankings of the 2023 applications are as follows: 1. City of Marathon Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting Addition —requesting $ 1,000,000. 2. City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity -requesting $52,590.56 3. City of Marathon Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path -requesting $ 956,650 4. City of Key West Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan—requesting $160,000 5. City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, Invasive Species removal—requesting $133,212 Upon approval by the BOCC, the decision will be transmitted to the FDOT for funding consideration and inclusion in the FDOT 5-Year Work Program. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: July 20, 2011 -Approval of staff recommendations for the 2011 TAP application cycle. August 21, 2013 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2013 TAP application cycle. June 11, 2014 -Approval of staff recommendations for the 2014 TAP application cycle. May 20, 2015 -Approval of staff recommendations for the 2015 TAP application cycle. June 15, 2016 -Approval of staff recommendations for the 2016 TAP application cycle. May 17, 2017 -Approval of staff recommendations for the 2017 TAP application cycle. 2709 March 21, 2018 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2018 TAP application cycle. March 21, 2019 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2019 TA application cycle. March 17, 2021 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2021 TA application cycle. March 16, 2022 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2022 TA application cycle. March 22, 2023 - Approval of staff recommendations for the 2023 TA application cycle. INSURANCE REQUIRED: No CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval DOCUMENTATION: TAP-FINAL TOTAL SCORE_TAP 2024.pdf Staff Report DRAFT—12.18.23.docx rt Transpoation Alternatives Application Cycle Letter- 2024-11.6.2023.doc.pdf Application City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, Invasive Species removal.pdf Revised Project Cost Estimate—2024—Key_Colony_Beach_Updated 16De23—Harding.pdf Application Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West.pdf Application Island—Wide_Comprehensive_Wayfinding_Plan 4 202TA.Application signed.pdf Application Coco Plum Drive Multi-Use Path Completion and Lighting.pdf Revised Cost Plan—Part 12 Costs FDOT TA Application Coco Plum Drive Multi-Use Path Completion and Lighting R.2 12-22-23.pdf Application Coco Plum Drive Lighting Project.pdf Resolution—FDOT_TA.pdf FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A 2710 oa E 9; u° 3 0 00 o a s a o ro' >E m a 3 3 O n t? 3 � Z o 3 U v s o� > a v m w Im w'E u E ui Em �� E E o _ Q = W > E o o m E `v E m = m o E E E c o o oa r�u- 2711 DocuSign Envelope ID:922C1CFD-F606-4D00-ADA1-7F5413BAF601 FDOT IRS— Florida Department ofTransportation RON DESANTiS 1000 NW 111"'Avenue JARED W.PERDUE,P.E. GOVERNOR Miami,FL, 33 172-5800 SECRETARY November 6, 2023 Ms. Aileen Boucle, Executive Director Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization 111 NW 1 Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr., County Administrator Monroe County 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 205 Key West, FL 33040 Subject: 2024 Transportation Alternatives Application Cycle Dear Ms. Boucle and Mr. Gastesi: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is pleased to announce the 2024 Transportation Alternatives (TA) application cycle The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act increased annual allocations to the TA program presenting opportunities to fund additional critically important multimodal transportation projects at both the State and local level. Miami- Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) and Monroe County Planning and Environmental Department are responsible for forwarding this announcement to local agencies within their respective jurisdictions. Agencies are invited to submit applications for projects prioritized for Fiscal Year (FY) 2030. New projects are typically programmed in the fifth year of the Department's Tentative Work Program (FY 2030). However, funding is subject to the availability of TA Funds and an annual spending authority approved by the Florida Legislature. The TA application cycle is administered through the FDOT District Six Program Management Office. For information on eligibility, the selection criteria, and application submittals, see the attached "2024 Transportation Alternatives Selection and Prioritization Criteria Cycle FDOT District Six." The 2024 TA application deadline is December 6, 2023, 5:00 pm. The application must be submitted in Florida Grants Application Process (GAP) system. Applicants must request user access by registering with fLqap.corn. For more information view How to Submit an Application, and GAP User Guide. www.fdotgov I www.southflroads.com 2712 DocuSign Envelope ID:922C1CFD-F606-4D00-ADA1-7F5413BAF601 Aileen Boucl6 & Roman Gastesi November 2, 2023 Page 2 NOTE: Late submittals will not be accepted. Once the deadline passes, the system will not allow the applicant to upload or make changes to their applications. We look forward to working with you and your municipalities. Please contact Daniel Iglesias, the Director of Transportation Development, at (305) 470-5464 or Jessica Beck-Galindo, the Local Programs Administrator, at (305) 470-5404 if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued partnership with the Department. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: 9A89F25A7S144F3... Stacy L. Miller, P.E. District Secretary Attachments: 2024 Transportation Alternatives Selection and Prioritization Criteria Cycle FDOT District Six cc: Maria Teresita Vilches-Landa, P.E., Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization Franchesca Taylor, AICP, Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization Christine Hurley, Monroe County Kevin Wilson, Monroe County Emily Schemper, Monroe County Janene Sclafani, Monroe County Judith Clarke, P.E., Monroe County Samantha Samford, Florida Department of Transportation Daniel Iglesias, P.E., Florida Department of Transportation Mario Cabrera, P.E., Florida Department of Transportation Heidi Solaun, P.E., Florida Department of Transportation Antonette Adams, Florida Department of Transportation Dat Huynh, P.E., Florida Department of Transportation Jessica Beck-Galindo, Florida Department of Transportation Michael Lucero, Florida Department of Transportation Ken Jeffries, Florida Department of Transportation www.fdotgov I www.southflroads.com 2713 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FDOT SET-ASIDE PROGRAM (TA) FUNDING APPLICATION A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) [§ 11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 133(h)]. District representatives may be contacted for guidance. PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Applicant Agency Sponsor Type. Select the box indicating the agency of the person who can answer questions about this project proposal. Then complete applicable text fields. Note: State-recognized non-profit agencies may partner with an eligible governmental entity but are not eligible as a direct grant recipient. Checkbox next to each of the following types of agencies that do not indicate text field. Document allows one selection. Local government (e.g., county, city, village, town, etc.). Regional transportation authority or transit agency. Natural resource or public land agency. School district, local education agency, or school (may include any public or nonprofit private school). Projects should benefit the public and not just a private entity. Recognized Tribal Government. Other local or regional governmental entity with oversight responsibility for transportation or recreational trails, consistent with the goals of 23 U.S.C. 133(h). Metropolitan /Transportation Planning Organization /Agency (collectively MPO) (only for urbanized areas with less than 200,000 population). FDOT (only by request of another eligible entity, then enter the requesting entity). If"checked", enter the requesting entity in the space provided. (Word limit 5) 2. Agency name of the applicant. (Word limit 5). 3. Agency contact person's name and title. (Word limit 5). 4. Agency contact person's telephone number and email address. (Word limit 5). PART 2 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) CERTIFICATION LAP is FDOT's primary mechanism to provide governmental subrecipients with federal funds to develop transportation infrastructure facilities through cost-reimbursement (grant) agreements. This legal instrument (the grant agreement) will describe intergovernmental tasks to be accomplished and the funds to be reimbursed for selected projects. The FDOT Local Programs Manual and FDOT Procedure 525-010-300 provides details for local agencies to complete a certification process that is a risk-based assessment evaluating whether they have sufficient qualifications and abilities "to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work" for infrastructure projects. Non-profit organizations are not eligible for LAP certification, local agencies are not eligible for certification of Project Development and Environment (PD&E) or Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition phases. FDOT is required to provide oversight on fee-simple and less-than-fee ROW acquisition phases, including license agreements, encroachment agreements, perpetual easements, temporary construction easements, and donations. LAP Full Certification Provide: Approval Date: and Expiration Date: Responsible Charge Name: LAP Project Specific Certification Provide: Approval Date: Project FM(s) Number: Responsible Charge Name: Not LAP Certified —A LAP Certified Agency will deliver the project on behalf of the uncertified Agency. Provide: Sponsoring Contact Agency Name: Name: Address: Phone: Not LAP Certified - FDOT District will administer the project. Provide: FDOT Contact Name: Phone: Not LAP Certified —the Agency will become LAP certified 1 year prior to the delivery of the LAP project. Not Applicable—this is a Non — Infrastructure Project. 2715 1. Project Name /Title: (Word limit 15). 2. Is this a resubmittal of a previously unfunded project? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the year(s) of submittal(s) and include project title(s), if different, in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does this project connect a previously funded project(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the Financial Management (FM) number(s) and provide a brief description of the other related FDOT-funded phases that are complete, underway, or in the FDOT 5-year Work Program. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is funding requested for this same project from another source administered by FDOT? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate funding source(s) / application(s) submitted. NOTE: Contact your district representative to discuss if this same project is partially funded in the 5-year Work Program or if FDOT has received another application for funding it. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. What are you proposing in this application? In 200 words or less, provide a description of the project and what it will accomplish. The description should allow a person without prior knowledge of the project to clearly understand it. Summarize the purpose, need, project attributes, the relationship to surface transportation, how the project improves safety, and expected benefits. REQUIRED ® PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including 1) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome; detailed description of the existing conditions; and detailed description of the proposed project and major work item improvements (e.g., project limits (begin / end), width of sidewalks or trails and other components, materials, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement markings, etc.). 2) Intent to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for delivering the project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved facility, and compliance with all federal and state requirements. 2716 1. Indicate the municipality(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 2. Indicate the county(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 3. Roadway Classification Yes No State roadway (on-system) Yes No Federal roadway Yes No Local roadway (off-system) 4. Indicate the roadway name(s) [including applicable state, federal, county road number(s), local roadway name, and roadway identification number(e.g., SR 5/ US 1 / CR 904/Overseas Highway/ ID number: 90040000)]. (Word limit 10). 5. Indicate the roadway beginning project limits (south or west termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 6. Indicate the roadway ending project limits (north or east termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 7. Indicate the total project length, in miles and linear feet. (Word limit 10). 8. Does the project involve the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail network? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the trailway identification number, beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 9. Within the next five years, are non-FDOT funds being expended within the limits or adjacent to the proposed project? If not, select "no" and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain. (Word limit 50). Yes No PART 5 - PROJECT TYPE NOTE: Certain areas may not be prioritizing Non-infrastructure (NI) proposals or all eligible infrastructure activities (or may recommend bundling activities together). Contact your district representative for guidance. IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIWNMMM IIIIIIWIINJ IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ IRII@IIE IIMIMMI IIWNMMM II1111MA11 II1111MI@III IIMIMMI IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM IIWNMMM IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ MUM IIIIIIull11H MUM IIWNMMM MUM IIWNMMM IIWNMMMM IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM II1111MI@III IIWNMMMM IIIIIIull11H IIMIMMI II1111MA11 IIIIIIWIINJ II1111MA11 IImmm IIWN!M!M IImmm IIWN!M!M 1. PROJECT CATEGORY Select one box that best represents the project proposal. Then, complete either the "Infrastructure" or "NI" selections. A. Infrastructure. If so, select "yes", B. Non-infrastructure (NI). If so, select "yes", then then select the most appropriate select the most appropriate NI eligible activity from "infrastructure" eligible activity from the listing following the Infrastructure activities. listing below. (Pages range 5-6) (Page range 7) 5-A. INFRASTRUCTURE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY Select one box that best represents the project proposal).As applicable, complete infrastructure eligible text fields. Pedestrian and / or Bicycle facilities (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of off-road trail facilities or on-road facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation). Safe Routes for Non-Drivers (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of infrastructure related projects and systems that provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs). Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails (Select this box for conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors into trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonmotorized transportation users). Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks (Select this box for construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways visible from the project or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Outdoor Advertising Management (Select this box for inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Historic Preservation and Rehabilitation of Historic Transportation Facilities (Select this box for historic preservation or rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities). If"yes", list any locally designated or National Register of Historic Places listed or eligible resources or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Vegetation Management (Select this box for vegetation management in public transportation ROW to improve roadway safety, prevent invasive species, and erosion control). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). 2718 Part 5-A Infrastructure Eligible Activity continued... m Archaeological Activities (Select this box for archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects funded by FHWA). If"yes", list the State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the archaeological site, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Stormwater Mitigation (Select this box for environmental mitigation activities addressing stormwater management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to transportation projects). Wildlife Management (Select this box for wildlife mitigation and reduction of wildlife mortality, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats). Boulevards (Select this box for boulevards, defined as a walkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfares in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These may be high ridership transit corridors; serve as primary goods movement and emergency response routes; and use vehicular and pedestrian access management techniques that promote economic revitalization and follow complete street principles]. If"yes", list any Florida Main Street communities or Florida Trail Towns within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Recreational Trails Program [Select this box for recreational trails compliant with 62-S-2, Florida Administrative Code, and 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)]. If"yes", list the parks / recreational areas within the project limits, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) [Select this box for SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208, that substantially improves the ability of kindergarten through 12th grade students (vulnerable road users) to walk and /or bicycle to school]. Traditionally includes sidewalks, traffic calming and speed reduction, traffic diversion improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossings, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle facilities, and bicycle parking facilities at public schools. If"yes", list the benefiting schools that are within two miles of the project limits; total student enrollment; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Other surface transportation eligible purpose (Only if within urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000). If"yes", list the eligible activity or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 5). 2719 ® *** Note: For Infrastructure projects, skip this page.*** Select one box that represents the project proposal. Checkbox indicating NI eligible activity. Document allows one selection. Vulnerable road user safety assessment as defined by Section 316.027 (b), F.S. Workforce development, training and education activities that are eligible uses of TAP funds. SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208. This NI activity must be primarily based at the school and benefit students and /or their parents and have documented support from the school(s). If"yes", list the benefiting schools; total student enrollment and students served by project; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in space provided. (Word limit 10). NI COMPONENTS As applicable, insert the number of each type of proposed activity. Numerical field indicating total number NI program would provide. Number of walk or bicycle audits. Number of after school programs receiving / Number of bicycle skills /safety classes. pedestrian / bicycle safety instructioneducation. Number of pedestrian skills/ safety classes. Number of bicycle rodeos. Number of community demonstration projects. Number of pedestrian safety skills events. Number of community encouragement activities. Number of schools with walking school Number of community challenges. bus programs (defined as planned route Number of community workshops /stakeholder with meeting points, a timetable, and a meetings. schedule of trained volunteers). Number of classroom / educational classes Number of schools with bicycle train receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / programs (defined as a planned route education. with meeting points, a timetable, and a schedule of trained volunteers). Number of school assemblies receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / education. Number of student-led leadership initiatives (e.g., student patrols, peer-led Number of training sessions to implement the SRTS learning, etc.). program (e.g., training for volunteer walking school bus leaders, training for bicycle train leaders, etc.). 2720 PART 6 - AREA CONDITIONS Select applicable boxes describing the area and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Select one box that describes the geographic population size of the project area. Non-Urban Area with a population of 5,000 or less Urban Area with a population greater than 5,000 but no more than 50,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 50,000 but no more than 200,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 200,000 2. Is the project within the boundary of an MPO*? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the MPO in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Is the project within the boundary of a Transportation Management Area (TMA)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the TMA in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is the project within a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) community or designated as a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) as defined pursuant to Section 288.0656, F.S.? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes" and indicate the REDI / RAO in the space provided. (Word limit 5) Yes No 5. Indicate the United States Congressional District number(s) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 6. Will the project address equity by providing benefits to traditionally underserved communities as determined by the U.S. Census? These communities could include low-income residents, minorities, those with limited English proficiency, persons with disabilities, children, or older adults. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain how the project improves environmental justice (e.g., disadvantage community access point(s) and destinations the project benefits, median household income, free or reduced priced school meals and how SRTS projects benefit the students, etc.). (Word limit 10). Yes No 7. Are there transit stops /shelters /support facilities within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the identification number. (Word limit 5). Yes No 8. Is the project within a high-crash pedestrian corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving pedestrians)? Yes No Part 6-Area Conditions continued... m 9. Is the project within a high-crash bicycle corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving bicyclists)? Yes No 10.Would the project implement a bicycle or pedestrian action plan(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and specify the name of the plan and date of adoption. (Word limit 5). Yes No *Metropolitan/Transportation Planning Organization/Agency(MPO) REQUIRED ® AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies, maps illustrating transit facilities and connectivity to the improvement, short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SRTS projects, median household income by census tract for community benefiting, collision heat maps / crash data for area surrounding project limits, etc.). PART 7 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement, engagement, and collaboration is a key component of the federal project development process and must be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in the event the project is selected for funding. Indicate which of the following are applicable (Select all that apply). Complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Does the greater community support the project, as demonstrated by recently adopted proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment and public engagement? If"yes", explain the engagement and how the concept evolved based on public involvement. Indicate the resolution number, adoption date, and participating parties in the space provided. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 2. Was the project discussed at a regularly scheduled meeting of an advisory board of an appointed group of citizens, such as bicycle pedestrian advisory groups or similar committee that provides support toward the project? If"yes", provide meeting information, including the date and type of advisory board meeting, and the input received. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 3. Was there an advertised public meeting to discuss the project? If"yes", provide a brief description, including the input received, how the concept evolved based on public involvement, date, and type of meeting. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 4. Do recent community surveys indicate both need and support for the project and stakeholders will continue to be engaged in the implementation of the project? If"yes", briefly explain. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No REQUIRED ® PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., resolution, proclamation, regularly scheduled meeting agenda and minutes, public meeting advertisement, community survey, letters of support, etc.). m Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), and / or the long-term management plan(s)? [Note: Board of County Commissioners functions as MPO in nonmetropolitan areas (Section 339.135(4)(c)1, F.S.)]. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and use the text field to explain consistency, include MPO prioritization number. If a modification is required, indicate the meeting date for adoption. (Word limit 10). Yes No UPLOAD:REQUIRED CONCURRENCY / CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s), excerpt from comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), management plan(s), prioritization list, etc.). PART 9 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Select the boxes describing the Environmental Conditions.As applicable, complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Environmental Conditions section. 1. Does the project involve lands identified by the Florida Wildlife Corridor Act of 2021 [Section 259.1055, Florida Statutes (F.S.)]? Yes No 2. Does the project involve state-owned conservation lands? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the state-owned conservation lands. NOTE: Use of state-owned conservation lands is subject to coordination by the managing entity. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does a railway facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate railway facility. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Does the project physically cross a railway facility? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the crossing's railway identification number, and beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. Would the project provide lighting at locations with nighttime crashes? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe the proposed lighting in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 6. Would the project implement an adopted Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe proposed ADA improvements in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 2723 Part 9- Environmental Conditions continued... m 7. Is an Environmental Assessment for the project complete? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe any specific issues in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 8. Is the project adjacent to locally designated or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible resources? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list resources, indicate if the resources have received Florida Department of State Historic Preservation Grant funds, and explain any preservation agreements, covenants, or easements in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 9. Are there any archaeological sites or Native American sites located within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the sites. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 10.Are there any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife /waterfowl refuges within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the facilities in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 11.Are there any navigable waterways adjacent to or within the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the navigable waterways. (Word limit 5). Yes No 12.Are there any wetlands within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. Include permit types required and any obtained for the project. (Word limit 5). Yes No 13.Is it likely that there are protected /endangered /threatened species and / or critical habitat impacts within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 14.Are there any potential contamination / hazardous waste areas within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 15.Are there any noise-sensitive areas near the project area? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown" (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits, copy of the entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans, etc.). PART 10 - DESIGN / TYPICAL SECTIONSm Select the boxes describing the design status and complete the text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Design /Typical Section. 1. Are signed and sealed design plans available for this project? Yes No 2. If design plans are not at 100 percent, or do not meet current standards and /or reflect existing conditions, select the box identifying the status. (Word limit 100). No design plans 30% design plans 60% design plans 90% design plans Other: 3. Briefly describe the design status in the space provided. If design is at 100 percent, indicate the date of the plans. (Word limit 100). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): Typical Section(s) depicting existing and proposed features, dimensions, and ROW lines. If there are multiple segments, provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 2725 PART 11 - OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUSm Select the boxes describing the Ownership/ ROW Status and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Ownership/ ROW Status section. 1. Is ROW acquisition, defined as obtaining property not currently owned by the Local Agency through any means (e.g., deed, easement, dedication, donation, etc.), necessary to complete this project? Yes No 2. Explain the ROW status (owned /fee simple, leased / less-than fee, and /or needs) along the project boundary, including when ROW was obtained and how ownership is documented (e.g., plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, transfers, easements). Provide information for verifying ownership (e.g., book/ page number, transfer agreements, dates, etc.). If ROW acquisition is necessary before constructing the proposed project and / or the applicant agency is not the landowner, indicate the necessary coordination with other owners for all fee-simple purchases and / or any less-than fee/ lease needs (including temporary construction and /or other easements and / or permits for drainage, railroad, utilities, etc.) necessary to secure ROW certification. Indicate the proposed acquisition timeline, expected funding source, the total number of parcels, type of acquisition, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed land. (Word limit 150). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting site control and related landowner supporting documentation. Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s) comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is control of the project site (e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats, warranty deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, easements, use agreement, etc.). Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership in relation to the project boundary and /or limits. NOTE: provide map documentation on 8.5" x 11" scale. DO NOT provide reduced copies of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. If applicable, an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project, together with a spreadsheet providing the tax identification number(s) of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcel. 2726 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) Part 12 - Project Implementation and Costs continued... m *** Note: applications for infrastructure projects do not need to fill out this page*** NI Cost Narrative Table Below each item, explain how the item will support the program, and other appropriate details. umHp��N���G tl�V�q�IIIIIU�mu �n�nnm�k�P pN" �b�� g, ^��.I ,�, �pU �„p> NI• ,�> „,� .tlN tlN I� „.� tlN �� �� ,�,.,;� tlN tlk, ,�, ,„..tlN i ,„.� �� � ,�, ,�, U'� ^���, �� tl�.tlN tlN. ,tlry,. lu G � q Narrative: Narrative: Narrative: Materials and Supplies: Educational items: Promotional Items: Other Expenses: Equipment: u 2728 RESOURCES FDOT Transportation Alternatives Program: httpLL/ A w.fdot.gov/plan ni ng/systems/systems-ma nagement/tap FDOT Local Agency Program Manual: http://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/LP/Default.shtm FDOT Office of Environmental Management PD&E Manual: https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman®current FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual: https://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/estimates/documents/basisofestimatesmanual/boemanual Florida Safe Routes to School Guidelines: https://www.fdot.gov/safety/2A®Programs/Safe®Routes.shtm 2729 FDOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM „mmlio, !piimo;;r �� m w CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, Invasive Species r1N LOCATION: 600 West Ocean Drive, PO Box 510141, Key Colony Beach, Floorida, 33051-0141 PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) West Ocean Drive and 12th Street within City of Key Colony Beach (to north or east limit) 1st Street and East Oceaan Drive within City of Key Colony Beach By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match, incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP V agreement, and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NEPA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and other State and/or Federal agencies, prior to construction. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT's Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDOT's Work Program. * Signature Beth Ramsey-Vickrey Tom Harding Name (please type or print) Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice- Mayor Secretary/Treasurer Title 04De23 Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). 2730 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 11111EQUI11RIED UIPLOAD, PROJECT INFORIMAT1011411 SUPPORTING I T T1 0 incluuding '1I) Scope ofWork clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired ouutcome,detailed descrilptiion of the existing conditlonsa and detaliled description of the Iproposed project and major work Item Improvements (e.g., project limits(begin I end)v width of sidewalks or trails and father components, rmatehais,drainage, lighting,signing and pavement markings,etc.). ) Intent to enter Into a cast reimbursement ursement agreement for dellNering the pruaiect. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the,applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memoranduairn of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for onguaing operations end maintenance of the improved facility,and compliance with aH federal and state requirements. Scope of Work 1. Scope of work reviewed in attached PowerPoint presentation material: Scope of Requested Projects: • Improve compliancewith the American Disabilities Act (ADA) by adding and improving Handicap Parking spaces at our city public parks • Improve safety by the addition of new attached parking lot for one current public park. Removesthe need to walk into city roadways to access the city park facilities from the current detached parking lot • Add additional asphalt walkways to allow hardened surface access from Handicap parking spaces to city park facilities • Purchase for shared residents and guest usage a beach access wheelchair to utilize in any of the three city parks, improvement for ADA access of the parks • Community Improvement—removal of invasive species in three locations with replacement of Florida native plants • Signage addition for no motorized vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle paths to improve safety of the current utilized paths • Funding:TA Program 80%, Local Funds 20% 2. Agreement to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for the project. Funding agreement 20% local —City of Key Colony Beach, and 80%federal through FDOT TA 2024 program. Agreement from City Commission meeting on 16No23. Meeting Minutes below from the meeting: • Project Sponsor Support - City Commission Meeting Minutes from 16No23: MINUTES KEY COLONY BEACH CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, November 16, 2023 — 9:30 am FDOT Grant Application (Addendum): MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Harding to approve the 2024 FDOT grant application for transportation alternatives per the spreadsheet that Was provided. Mayor Pro-Tem Ramsay-Vickrey asked for a second. Commissioner DiFransico seconded the motion. DISCUSSION: None. ON THE MOTION: Rollcall vote. Unanimous approval. • City Commission Formal Resolution Approval— planned for approval at City Commission meeting on 14De23 3. Signed TA program certification project sponsor sheet. Signed by Mayor and Secretary/Treasurer from the City Commission of Key Colony Beach. 18 of 3L2731 SUPPORTING INFORMATION RAM CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT' SPO,N'SO,R d mat PROJECT NAME. City of iw;ra'y Colony Beacil ADD and Ssf ty inlProvernents for Public Parks and P itfa ,Invasive SPrmoies rer LOOATI0 Wet Ocean Drive, PO tfox 5110141, Key Colony Beach,Ftoo d „330 re -0141 PROJECT LIMITS. �froram south or west t limit) West Ocean,Drive and 1 tim Street withiin City of Key Colony eaot"m to north or east limit) 1 st Street and E gat Ocaaan Drive within City of Key Colony Beach y chootaing the box'YOU agree to do the follow,ving. Enter mruto a maintenance roornorat with,the Florida,Department of Transportation (FOOT)„ as necessary, Prior to the design chase, Oorrw ty with the Fedoras 1Urruifr rum Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Rlght of Wary actions required for the project, Provide any required funding match, iooamr any dditiranot expenses beyond l the pproved Project costs in the LAP' a re mrmmoamt4 and are respon!sible for any non-participating items toa9• utility reloc tioo ). Pursue or retain LAP oartibo tion and enter into a LAP agreement wlthii FDOT Comply with fw EPA process Prior to oorw tnicti(mam, lirmoludiinm l any necessary involvement with the State Historic Preservation Officer(SH''PO)„ and other Stateand/or Federal agendies, poor to construction, ctiorn t further certify that the estimated costs inotaadiodl heroin are reasonable and ire'o to follow through on the project once programmed d in the FOOT'FOOT's Work Program, i folly understand thmut significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be rornov d frorrm the FDOT"s Work Program, Seth tarm ay- . m ..... A � .. ,,." icrn' °f orn Harding .... Name pilootyPo or,print) twt yar Pro-Tmmmwmi Vice-Mayor Secretary/Treasurer Tn ...w. ....�,._ ��."........... .�. w.. ._ tlr�' 04De 3 Date k This simouid be executed d by Person on hmo has signaitory auttn'orfty for sponsor and is authorized to obitigate,services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or courted), 19 of 3L2732 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 20 of K2733 REQUIRED DUI L m AREA COINIDIT11ONSSUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION(e.g.,excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies,maps Oliustratting transit facilities and connectivity to the Improvement,short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SiRTS, projects, median houJsehoid income by census tract for community benefiting,coilllision heat:maps J crash data for area surroiumdiresg project Ilimits,etc.). 1. Map of areas within the city for proposed requests included in PowerPoint presentation. Please see attached file. 2. Meeting minutes from public meeting showing City Commission support: • Project Sponsor Support - City Commission Meeting Minutes from 16No23: MINUTES KEY COLONY BEACH CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, November 16, 2023 — 9:30 am FDOT Grant Application (Addendum): MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Harding to approve the 2024 FDOT grant application for transportation alternatives per the spreadsheet that was provided. Mayor Pro-Tem Ramsay-Vickrey asked for a second. Commissioner DiFransico seconded the motion. DISCUSSION: None. ON THE MOTION: Rollcall vote. Unanimous approval. • City Commission Formal Resolution Approval- planned for approval at City Commission meeting on 14De23 3. The median household income in Key Colony Beach, FL in 2021 was $88,556, which was 28.8% greater than the median annual income of $63,062 across the entire state of Florida. Compared to the median income of $45,577 in 2000 this represents an increase of 48.5%. 4. Benefit to Community: a. Addition of handicap parking spot and standard parking spot to East Park, that does not require residents and guests to enter existing roadways to enter the park. Current parking lot is disconnected. b. Hardened handicap parking spots in two other public city parks. c. Hardened paths for access for handicap usage of park facilities d. Improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists on current paths with improved signage 21 of K2734 e. Removal of invasive species in three location 22 of K 2735 REQUIRED UIPLOAD., PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e,g., resolution, prodarnafion, regularly schedulled meeting agenda and minutes, public meefing advertisement, community survey,Iletters of support, etc,). 1. Meeting minutes from 16No23 City Commission Meeting: - Project Sponsor Support - City Commission Meeting Minutes from 16No23: MINUTES KEY COLONY BEACH CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, November 16, 2023 — 9:30 am FDOT Grant Application (Addendum): MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Harding to approve the 2024 FDOT grant application for transportation alternatives per the spreadsheet that was provided. Mayor Pro-Tem Ramsay-Vickrey asked for a second. Commissioner DiFransico seconded the motion. DISCUSSION: None. ON THE MOTION: Rollcall vote. Unanimous approval. • City Commission Formal Resolution Approval— planned for approval at City Commission meeting on 14De23 2. Formal Resolution to be approved on 14De23 at the next regular meeting of the City Commission.Approved Resolution will be forwarded once approved. 3. City Staff agreed and approved project scope, including City Administrator, Public Parks Manager, Chief of Police. 23 of K 2736 REQUIRIED UIPLOAD., CONQUIRRIENICY P COINSISTE:NCY SUIPP'10111TING DOCUMEINTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s),excerpt from comprehensive plan(s),transportation plan(s),capital improvement plan(s�, management plan(s),prioritization lli:st,etc.), 1. Supporting public meeting City Commission meeting minutes: • Project Sponsor Support - City Commission Meeting Minutes from 16No23: MINUTES KEY COLONY BEACH CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, November 16, 2023 — 9:30 am FDOT Grant Application (Addendum): MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Harding to approve the 2024 FDOT grant application for transportation alternatives per the spreadsheet that was provided. Mayor Pro-Tem Ramsay-Vickrey asked for a second. Commissioner DiFransico seconded the motion. DISCUSSION: None. ON THE MOTION: Rollcall vote. Unanimous approval. • City Commission Formal Resolution Approval— planned for approval at City Commission meeting on 14De23 2. Excerpt from comprehensive plan for support: Reference Material: CITY OF KEY COLONY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Supporting Documentation: Amended:June 9,2022,Ordinance Number:2021-468 Adopted Date: February 24, 1992 • Objective 1.4 Bikeway or Non-motorized Transportation Achieve preservation of the existing path system,thereby providing safe, convenient non-motorized circulation.Policy 1.4.1 Maintain the existing path system on the Sadowski Causeway and Ocean Drive 24 of K 2737 REQUIRED UIPILGADfor Infr stru� tu�re (not applitalble for I)- ENIVIROMM ENTAIL,CONDITIONS it PIPORTING DOCUIMENT °TI10IN (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits„copy ofthe entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans,etc.) 1. Please see attached PowerPoint presentation for pictures of areas for the project work and the map of locations. Formal environmental study has not been completed yet but planned as part of engineering design phase. No concerns identified from areas proposed in the city. 25 of K2738 REQUIRED UIPLOAD for Infrastructure (not appfloable far NII), OWNERSHIP I ROVI STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION indu6ng applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting We control)and related landowner supporting documentation.Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s)comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there Is control of the project site(e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats,warranty deeds, prescriptions,certlified surveys,easements,use agreement,etc.).Malips,should clearly show the location of each ownership In relation to the projact boundary and I or fimits. NOTE provide map documentation on 8,5"x '1111'scale. DO NOT provide iredurced coples of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. Ilf applicable,an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project,together with a spreadsheet proOdl�ng the tax Identification number(s)of each imparted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area,for each impacted parcel. 1. Please see PowerPoint presentation for areas planned for the proposed Key Colony Beach project. 2. All areas are owed and maintained by the City of Key Colony Beach. A map of the areas along with GPS information is included in the PowerPoint. 3. No areas are needed to purchase from a private owner, since all areas are currently owed by the city. 26 of 3L 2739 Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside(TA) ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE Financial Management Number(if applicable): Project Description:City of Key Colony Beach 2024 TA Application,Handicap public park improvements,removal of invasive species,safety signage Items TA Eligible other Funds(must include all TA ineligible items) TOTAL Pay Item Number* Pay Item Description* Quantity Unit Englneer's Engineer's Subtotal Quantity Unit Engineer's Engineer's Subtotal Sources)of Match Total Total Engineer's Cost Unit Cost Cost(TA funds) Unit Cost Cost(other funds) Quantity ast park in,tall haicap par ingspot an Stan ar par ingspot. 1 Install asphalt pathn Gradingrequired.Parking 24'x25',pathway 1 1 $ M000,00 $ 18,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 18,000,00 East par remova o n—j-species,an repacement it 2 Florida native plants.50 feet 1 1 $ 8,000,00 $ 8,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 8,000,00 ]t street park asp a[handicap parking spot,asphalto ne existing 3 path,(install a new asphalt path.Parking spot 30'x15',paths 1 1 $20,000,00 $ 20,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 20,000,00 Sunset par asp a[handicap parking spot,asp at o ne existi ng 4 path.Parking spot 21'x40',path 8'x80'.Limited grading requlred. 1 1 $ 16,000,00 $ 16,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 16,000,00 S Purchase one beach access w h-lchaj,for pubic use 1 1 $ 3,000,00 $ 3,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 3,000,00 6 Removal o fl nvaslve species-Front Entrance Park,SS feet 1 1 $ 9,000,00 $ 9,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 9,000,00 ] Removal o fl nvaslve species-Sadowski Causeway.SS feet 1 1 $ 9,000,00 $ 9,000 Do 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 9,000,00 8 Pedestrian Bicycle path signage,8 total signs 8 1 $ 100,00 $ 800.00 0 EA $ - $ - 8 $ 800,00 Engineering-drawing,—1—mental—(nation,Inspection, 9 onstruction review 1 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 10,000,00 10 City permitting costs 1 1 $ 1,920,00 $ 1,920.00 0 EA $ - $ - 1 $ 1,920,00 Assumed cost share by local is 20%,80%federal EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ Engineering includes an estimate for all engineering work EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ S.mma,i,cd byTom Harding,costs are estimate,no.,ma quotes o btaincd at this time EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - 0 $ TA Eligible Costs/TA Funds Other Funds Requested(notfundedthrcugh other 5 95,720.00 $ - (must include TA Ineligible Costs) Subtotal $ 95,]20.00 es) Design Cost $ - CEI Cost $ CONTINGENCY(REQUIRED) Contingency is not a FHWA Participating Item $ Total Cost Estimate $ 5 $ A reasonable estimate of project costs is requlred.Projects must follow appropriate design criteria and meet Americans with Disabilities Act requirements.Projects on the State Highway System,and"on-system"(on FDOT land),and Critical Projects shall utilize FDOT pay items umbers and descriptions.FOOLS AWARD OF FUNDING TO THE APPLICANTS PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF PARTICIPATING VS.NON-PARTICIPATING ITEMS IDENTIFIED IN THIS COST ESTIMATE.Funding pay items and eligibility will be discussed during project development. Prepared by: PE Number: Wmules of Non-oarticiaatine items: Mowing,litter removal,optional services;video inspection;utility directional bore/utility agency owner directional bores; fName: Signature: Date: Utility work,including but not limited to valve adjustments,utility relocations,power pole relocations, Contingency (Reviewed by: Other elements maybe non-participating,the ones listed above are non.particatlag commonly used pay items. If Vou have questions regard(ng a n eligible or non-pa rticipati ng lLem,District representatives may be co ntacted fo r guidance. Name.. Signature. Date: References: FDOT Design https://www.fdot Fov/roadway Environmental Management https://www.(dot Fov/en ent FDOT Estimates htt s w.(dot..o ent estimates documents Local Programs Manual hit s. www dot.o cnt la la toes hur TA Set-Aside Program NIP, t w.fdo .o lannincnsastems s stems m entta 27 of K2740 REQUIRIED,UPLOAD for Infrastructure (rr t appiteable for i),TypioaiSection(s)depicting existing and proposed features,dimensions,and ROW lines. If there are rnu l ipie segments,provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 1. Please reference the PowerPoint Summary file attached in the package. Sketches of all three work areas are included with suggested dimensions. Formal engineering drawings have not been started and will be planned as part of the project scope and timing plan details. 2. All areas are owned by the city, and have full right of way for areas. 28 of K2741 FD TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: City of Key Colony Beach AAA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths„ Invasive Species rer LOCATION: 600"west ocean Drive„ PC Box 510141, Key Colony Beach, Floodda,330 1-0141 PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) West ocean [give and 12th Street within City of Key Colony Beach (to north or east limit) 1st.Street and Bast oceaan Drive within City of Key Colony Beach By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match„ incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP agreement„ and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NE.PA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic Preservation {officer(SHPO)„ and other State and/or Federal agencies„ prior to construction. i further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT"s Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDOT„s Work Program. n Zlgnature Beth Ramsey-Vickrey Tarn Harding Name (please type or print) Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice-Mayor Secretary/Treasurer Title o4De 3 Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). I p P I 9 j I j Il 1 I p r I j I a; I I r tn I _ i I Z. I Y ) I � i I 2743 I, i } z i t f i { i I f I Y f yq i W C p s% 6' I I ,pg {V i i e y � I C R 1 � 2744 i I r l I lob 16ro Ol r, rr B � f f I r 7/c.7/4 V 4 r I Raw y E G I a 2745 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / 07/2029 11/2029 8,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 10,000.00 Design (PE) Environmental Assessment 07/2029 11/2029 25,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 30,000.00 (associated with PE) Permits 07/2029 10/2029 1,632.00 0.00 288.00 0.00 1,920.00 (associated with PE) ROW Construction 01/2030 09/2030 97,580.00 0.00 17,220.00 0.00 114,800.00 CEI Other costs (describe) 2746 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FDOT SET-ASIDE PROGRAM (TA) FUNDING APPLICATION A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) [§ 11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 133(h)]. District representatives may be contacted for guidance. PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Applicant Agency Sponsor Type. Select the box indicating the agency of the person who can answer questions about this project proposal. Then complete applicable text fields. Note: State-recognized non-profit agencies may partner with an eligible governmental entity but are not eligible as a direct grant recipient. Checkbox next to each of the following types of agencies that do not indicate text field. Document allows one selection. Local government (e.g., county, city, village, town, etc.). Regional transportation authority or transit agency. Natural resource or public land agency. School district, local education agency, or school (may include any public or nonprofit private school). Projects should benefit the public and not just a private entity. Recognized Tribal Government. Other local or regional governmental entity with oversight responsibility for transportation or recreational trails, consistent with the goals of 23 U.S.C. 133(h). Metropolitan /Transportation Planning Organization /Agency (collectively MPO) (only for urbanized areas with less than 200,000 population). FDOT (only by request of another eligible entity, then enter the requesting entity). If"checked", enter the requesting entity in the space provided. (Word limit 5) 2. Agency name of the applicant. (Word limit 5). 3. Agency contact person's name and title. (Word limit 5). 4. Agency contact person's telephone number and email address. (Word limit 5). PART 2 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) CERTIFICATION LAP is FDOT's primary mechanism to provide governmental subrecipients with federal funds to develop transportation infrastructure facilities through cost-reimbursement (grant) agreements. This legal instrument (the grant agreement) will describe intergovernmental tasks to be accomplished and the funds to be reimbursed for selected projects. The FDOT Local Programs Manual and FDOT Procedure 525-010-300 provides details for local agencies to complete a certification process that is a risk-based assessment evaluating whether they have sufficient qualifications and abilities "to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work" for infrastructure projects. Non-profit organizations are not eligible for LAP certification, local agencies are not eligible for certification of Project Development and Environment (PD&E) or Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition phases. FDOT is required to provide oversight on fee-simple and less-than-fee ROW acquisition phases, including license agreements, encroachment agreements, perpetual easements, temporary construction easements, and donations. LAP Full Certification Provide: Approval Date: and Expiration Date: Responsible Charge Name: LAP Project Specific Certification Provide: Approval Date: Project FM(s) Number: Responsible Charge Name: Not LAP Certified —A LAP Certified Agency will deliver the project on behalf of the uncertified Agency. Provide: Sponsoring Contact Agency Name: Name: Address: Phone: Not LAP Certified - FDOT District will administer the project. Provide: FDOT Contact Name: Phone: Not LAP Certified —the Agency will become LAP certified 1 year prior to the delivery of the LAP project. Not Applicable—this is a Non — Infrastructure Project. 2748 1. Project Name /Title: (Word limit 15). 2. Is this a resubmittal of a previously unfunded project? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the year(s) of submittal(s) and include project title(s), if different, in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does this project connect a previously funded project(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the Financial Management (FM) number(s) and provide a brief description of the other related FDOT-funded phases that are complete, underway, or in the FDOT 5-year Work Program. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is funding requested for this same project from another source administered by FDOT? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate funding source(s) / application(s) submitted. NOTE: Contact your district representative to discuss if this same project is partially funded in the 5-year Work Program or if FDOT has received another application for funding it. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. What are you proposing in this application? In 200 words or less, provide a description of the project and what it will accomplish. The description should allow a person without prior knowledge of the project to clearly understand it. Summarize the purpose, need, project attributes, the relationship to surface transportation, how the project improves safety, and expected benefits. REQUIRED ® PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including 1) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome; detailed description of the existing conditions; and detailed description of the proposed project and major work item improvements (e.g., project limits (begin / end), width of sidewalks or trails and other components, materials, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement markings, etc.). 2) Intent to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for delivering the project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved facility, and compliance with all federal and state requirements. 2749 1. Indicate the municipality(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 2. Indicate the county(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 3. Roadway Classification Yes No State roadway (on-system) Yes No Federal roadway Yes No Local roadway (off-system) 4. Indicate the roadway name(s) [including applicable state, federal, county road number(s), local roadway name, and roadway identification number(e.g., SR 5/ US 1 / CR 904/Overseas Highway/ ID number: 90040000)]. (Word limit 10). 5. Indicate the roadway beginning project limits (south or west termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 6. Indicate the roadway ending project limits (north or east termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 7. Indicate the total project length, in miles and linear feet. (Word limit 10). 8. Does the project involve the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail network? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the trailway identification number, beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 9. Within the next five years, are non-FDOT funds being expended within the limits or adjacent to the proposed project? If not, select "no" and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain. (Word limit 50). Yes No 2750 PART 5 - PROJECT TYPE NOTE: Certain areas may not be prioritizing Non-infrastructure (NI) proposals or all eligible infrastructure activities (or may recommend bundling activities together). Contact your district representative for guidance. IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIWNMMM IIIIIIWIINJ IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ IRII@IIE IIMIMMI IIWNMMM II1111MA11 II1111MI@III IIMIMMI IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM IIWNMMM IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ MUM IIIIIIull11H MUM IIWNMMM MUM IIWNMMM IIWNMMMM IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM II1111MI@III IIWNMMMM IIIIIIull11H IIMIMMI II1111MA11 IIIIIIWIINJ II1111MA11 IImmm IIWN!M!M IImmm IIWN!M!M 1. PROJECT CATEGORY Select one box that best represents the project proposal. Then, complete either the "Infrastructure" or "NI" selections. A. Infrastructure. If so, select "yes", B. Non-infrastructure (NI). If so, select "yes", then then select the most appropriate select the most appropriate NI eligible activity from "infrastructure" eligible activity from the listing following the Infrastructure activities. listing below. (Pages range 5-6) (Page range 7) 5-A. INFRASTRUCTURE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY Select one box that best represents the project proposal).As applicable, complete infrastructure eligible text fields. Pedestrian and / or Bicycle facilities (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of off-road trail facilities or on-road facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation). Safe Routes for Non-Drivers (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of infrastructure related projects and systems that provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs). Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails (Select this box for conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors into trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonmotorized transportation users). Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks (Select this box for construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways visible from the project or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Outdoor Advertising Management (Select this box for inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Historic Preservation and Rehabilitation of Historic Transportation Facilities (Select this box for historic preservation or rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities). If"yes", list any locally designated or National Register of Historic Places listed or eligible resources or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Vegetation Management (Select this box for vegetation management in public transportation ROW to improve roadway safety, prevent invasive species, and erosion control). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). 2751 Part 5-A Infrastructure Eligible Activity continued... m Archaeological Activities (Select this box for archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects funded by FHWA). If"yes", list the State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the archaeological site, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Stormwater Mitigation (Select this box for environmental mitigation activities addressing stormwater management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to transportation projects). Wildlife Management (Select this box for wildlife mitigation and reduction of wildlife mortality, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats). Boulevards (Select this box for boulevards, defined as a walkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfares in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These may be high ridership transit corridors; serve as primary goods movement and emergency response routes; and use vehicular and pedestrian access management techniques that promote economic revitalization and follow complete street principles]. If"yes", list any Florida Main Street communities or Florida Trail Towns within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Recreational Trails Program [Select this box for recreational trails compliant with 62-S-2, Florida Administrative Code, and 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)]. If"yes", list the parks / recreational areas within the project limits, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) [Select this box for SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208, that substantially improves the ability of kindergarten through 12th grade students (vulnerable road users) to walk and /or bicycle to school]. Traditionally includes sidewalks, traffic calming and speed reduction, traffic diversion improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossings, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle facilities, and bicycle parking facilities at public schools. If"yes", list the benefiting schools that are within two miles of the project limits; total student enrollment; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Other surface transportation eligible purpose (Only if within urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000). If"yes", list the eligible activity or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 5). 2752 ® *** Note: For Infrastructure projects, skip this page.*** Select one box that represents the project proposal. Checkbox indicating NI eligible activity. Document allows one selection. Vulnerable road user safety assessment as defined by Section 316.027 (b), F.S. Workforce development, training and education activities that are eligible uses of TAP funds. SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208. This NI activity must be primarily based at the school and benefit students and /or their parents and have documented support from the school(s). If"yes", list the benefiting schools; total student enrollment and students served by project; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in space provided. (Word limit 10). NI COMPONENTS As applicable, insert the number of each type of proposed activity. Numerical field indicating total number NI program would provide. Number of walk or bicycle audits. Number of after school programs receiving / Number of bicycle skills /safety classes. pedestrian / bicycle safety instructioneducation. Number of pedestrian skills/ safety classes. Number of bicycle rodeos. Number of community demonstration projects. Number of pedestrian safety skills events. Number of community encouragement activities. Number of schools with walking school Number of community challenges. bus programs (defined as planned route Number of community workshops /stakeholder with meeting points, a timetable, and a meetings. schedule of trained volunteers). Number of classroom / educational classes Number of schools with bicycle train receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / programs (defined as a planned route education. with meeting points, a timetable, and a schedule of trained volunteers). Number of school assemblies receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / education. Number of student-led leadership initiatives (e.g., student patrols, peer-led Number of training sessions to implement the SRTS learning, etc.). program (e.g., training for volunteer walking school bus leaders, training for bicycle train leaders, etc.). 2753 PART 6 - AREA CONDITIONS Select applicable boxes describing the area and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Select one box that describes the geographic population size of the project area. Non-Urban Area with a population of 5,000 or less Urban Area with a population greater than 5,000 but no more than 50,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 50,000 but no more than 200,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 200,000 2. Is the project within the boundary of an MPO*? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the MPO in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Is the project within the boundary of a Transportation Management Area (TMA)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the TMA in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is the project within a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) community or designated as a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) as defined pursuant to Section 288.0656, F.S.? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes" and indicate the REDI / RAO in the space provided. (Word limit 5) Yes No 5. Indicate the United States Congressional District number(s) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 6. Will the project address equity by providing benefits to traditionally underserved communities as determined by the U.S. Census? These communities could include low-income residents, minorities, those with limited English proficiency, persons with disabilities, children, or older adults. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain how the project improves environmental justice (e.g., disadvantage community access point(s) and destinations the project benefits, median household income, free or reduced priced school meals and how SRTS projects benefit the students, etc.). (Word limit 10). Yes No 7. Are there transit stops /shelters /support facilities within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the identification number. (Word limit 5). Yes No 8. Is the project within a high-crash pedestrian corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving pedestrians)? Yes No 2754 Part 6-Area Conditions continued... m 9. Is the project within a high-crash bicycle corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving bicyclists)? Yes No 10.Would the project implement a bicycle or pedestrian action plan(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and specify the name of the plan and date of adoption. (Word limit 5). Yes No *Metropolitan/Transportation Planning Organization/Agency(MPO) REQUIRED ® AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies, maps illustrating transit facilities and connectivity to the improvement, short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SRTS projects, median household income by census tract for community benefiting, collision heat maps / crash data for area surrounding project limits, etc.). PART 7 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement, engagement, and collaboration is a key component of the federal project development process and must be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in the event the project is selected for funding. Indicate which of the following are applicable (Select all that apply). Complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Does the greater community support the project, as demonstrated by recently adopted proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment and public engagement? If"yes", explain the engagement and how the concept evolved based on public involvement. Indicate the resolution number, adoption date, and participating parties in the space provided. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 2. Was the project discussed at a regularly scheduled meeting of an advisory board of an appointed group of citizens, such as bicycle pedestrian advisory groups or similar committee that provides support toward the project? If"yes", provide meeting information, including the date and type of advisory board meeting, and the input received. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 3. Was there an advertised public meeting to discuss the project? If"yes", provide a brief description, including the input received, how the concept evolved based on public involvement, date, and type of meeting. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 4. Do recent community surveys indicate both need and support for the project and stakeholders will continue to be engaged in the implementation of the project? If"yes", briefly explain. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No REQUIRED ® PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., resolution, proclamation, regularly scheduled meeting agenda and minutes, public meeting advertisement, community survey, letters of support, etc.). 2755 m Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), and / or the long-term management plan(s)? [Note: Board of County Commissioners functions as MPO in nonmetropolitan areas (Section 339.135(4)(c)1, F.S.)]. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and use the text field to explain consistency, include MPO prioritization number. If a modification is required, indicate the meeting date for adoption. (Word limit 10). Yes No UPLOAD:REQUIRED CONCURRENCY / CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s), excerpt from comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), management plan(s), prioritization list, etc.). PART 9 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Select the boxes describing the Environmental Conditions.As applicable, complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Environmental Conditions section. 1. Does the project involve lands identified by the Florida Wildlife Corridor Act of 2021 [Section 259.1055, Florida Statutes (F.S.)]? Yes No 2. Does the project involve state-owned conservation lands? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the state-owned conservation lands. NOTE: Use of state-owned conservation lands is subject to coordination by the managing entity. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does a railway facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate railway facility. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Does the project physically cross a railway facility? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the crossing's railway identification number, and beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. Would the project provide lighting at locations with nighttime crashes? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe the proposed lighting in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 6. Would the project implement an adopted Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe proposed ADA improvements in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 2756 Part 9- Environmental Conditions continued... m 7. Is an Environmental Assessment for the project complete? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe any specific issues in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 8. Is the project adjacent to locally designated or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible resources? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list resources, indicate if the resources have received Florida Department of State Historic Preservation Grant funds, and explain any preservation agreements, covenants, or easements in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 9. Are there any archaeological sites or Native American sites located within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the sites. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 10.Are there any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife /waterfowl refuges within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the facilities in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 11.Are there any navigable waterways adjacent to or within the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the navigable waterways. (Word limit 5). Yes No 12.Are there any wetlands within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. Include permit types required and any obtained for the project. (Word limit 5). Yes No 13.Is it likely that there are protected /endangered /threatened species and / or critical habitat impacts within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 14.Are there any potential contamination / hazardous waste areas within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 15.Are there any noise-sensitive areas near the project area? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown" (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits, copy of the entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans, etc.). 2757 PART 10 - DESIGN / TYPICAL SECTIONSm Select the boxes describing the design status and complete the text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Design /Typical Section. 1. Are signed and sealed design plans available for this project? Yes No 2. If design plans are not at 100 percent, or do not meet current standards and /or reflect existing conditions, select the box identifying the status. (Word limit 100). No design plans 30% design plans 60% design plans 90% design plans Other: 3. Briefly describe the design status in the space provided. If design is at 100 percent, indicate the date of the plans. (Word limit 100). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): Typical Section(s) depicting existing and proposed features, dimensions, and ROW lines. If there are multiple segments, provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 2758 PART 11 - OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUSm Select the boxes describing the Ownership/ ROW Status and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Ownership/ ROW Status section. 1. Is ROW acquisition, defined as obtaining property not currently owned by the Local Agency through any means (e.g., deed, easement, dedication, donation, etc.), necessary to complete this project? Yes No 2. Explain the ROW status (owned /fee simple, leased / less-than fee, and /or needs) along the project boundary, including when ROW was obtained and how ownership is documented (e.g., plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, transfers, easements). Provide information for verifying ownership (e.g., book/ page number, transfer agreements, dates, etc.). If ROW acquisition is necessary before constructing the proposed project and / or the applicant agency is not the landowner, indicate the necessary coordination with other owners for all fee-simple purchases and / or any less-than fee/ lease needs (including temporary construction and /or other easements and / or permits for drainage, railroad, utilities, etc.) necessary to secure ROW certification. Indicate the proposed acquisition timeline, expected funding source, the total number of parcels, type of acquisition, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed land. (Word limit 150). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting site control and related landowner supporting documentation. Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s) comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is control of the project site (e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats, warranty deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, easements, use agreement, etc.). Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership in relation to the project boundary and /or limits. NOTE: provide map documentation on 8.5" x 11" scale. DO NOT provide reduced copies of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. If applicable, an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project, together with a spreadsheet providing the tax identification number(s) of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcel. 2759 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) 2760 Part 12 - Project Implementation and Costs continued... m *** Note: applications for infrastructure projects do not need to fill out this page*** NI Cost Narrative Table Below each item, explain how the item will support the program, and other appropriate details. umHp��N���G tl�V�q�IIIIIU�mu �n�nnm�k�P pN" �b�� g, ^��.I ,�, �pU �„p> NI• ,�> „,� .tlN tlN I� „.� tlN �� �� ,�,.,;� tlN tlk, ,�, ,„..tlN i ,„.� �� � ,�, ,�, U'� ^���, �� tl�.tlN tlN. ,tlry,. lu G � q Narrative: Narrative: Narrative: Materials and Supplies: Educational items: Promotional Items: Other Expenses: Equipment: u 2761 RESOURCES FDOT Transportation Alternatives Program: httpLL/ A w.fdot.gov/plan ni ng/systems/systems-ma nagement/tap FDOT Local Agency Program Manual: http://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/LP/Default.shtm FDOT Office of Environmental Management PD&E Manual: https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman®current FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual: https://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/estimates/documents/basisofestimatesmanual/boemanual Florida Safe Routes to School Guidelines: https://www.fdot.gov/safety/2A®Programs/Safe®Routes.shtm 2762 F D TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM ° °"rc°° CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West LOCATION: City of Key West PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) N/A (to north or east limit) NIA By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match, incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP 1/ agreement, and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NEPA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic 1/ Preservation Officer(SHPO), and other State and/or Federal agencies, prior to construction. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT's Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDOT's.,W rk Program. 1?011" Aof Legal Svc M * Signa re Albert Childress Name (please type or print) 0 of ��io, Q'�' City Manager GRA .-._................_.a............__ .�-_. �msing'� Title Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). IN" miff, w m 2763 SUPPORTING INFORMATION REQUIRIED UPLOAD: IPIROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTAT1101114 linclutling 1)Scope of Work clearly dioscribilng the purpose and need for this pirojed and the desired outcoma�,detailed description of the existing condifilorts;and detailed diescription of the proposed project and major work item Improvements,(e!,g,, project limits(begin/eind),widith of sidewalks oir trails and other components, materials,drainage,fightfing,signing and 1pavement markings, etc), 2)Intent to enter into a cost reirribursementagreement for deRverIng the prc�ect, 3)Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agoncy confirmilng the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the informall on is actura te, Intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance ofthe Improved facifity,and compliance with all federal andstate requirements. Scope ofWork The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project is intended to enhance the city's reputation as a bike-friendly destination, responding to a substantial number of residents who already ride bicycles to work every day. An average of 15 percent of Key West residents' bike to work, making it one of the top-ranked cities in the nation for bike commuting as of 2013.This notable preference for biking necessitates an upgrade to the city's public transit system to better accommodate cyclists. The need for this project is rooted in the growing demand for sustainable and active transportation options on the island. While a significant portion of residents already rely on bicycles for commuting and recreation,the existing transit buses can only carry two bicycles, limiting accessibility and convenience.The desired outcome of this initiative is to doub|ethebike'carryingcapadtyonbuoeo, creatingaoeam|eooandoafeinterp|aybetweenbikingandpubUctranoit. By doing so, Key West aims tofurther promote cycling as a viable means of daily transportation, alleviate traffic congestion, and contribute to environmental ouotainabiUty. In essence,the project strives to establish Key West as a leading city for eco'friend|y commuting, benefiting both residents and tourists alike. Currently, Key West's public transit system offers bike racks on its buses, allowing each bus to carry two bicycles. A pair ofotandard'oized bicycles can be securely stored on these racks.This capacity, however, does not meet the community's needs given both the increasing demand for bicycle transportation in Key West, and the variability in tire sizes.The new 3'bicyde racks aim to solve both deficiencies. Many residents and visitors in Key West rely on bicycles for commuting, recreation, and as a means of accessing various parts of the city. With a thriving biking culture,the existing bike racks are frequently at or near full capacity, which can be inconvenient for passengers looking to combine cycling with their bus ride. Proposed Project h8 'orDVork|temms: The proposed Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project aims to address these limitations by upgrading the existing bike racks on the Key West public transit buses.The major work item improvements for this project include: 1. Bike Rack Procurement:The project will involve the acquisition of 23 new-style bike racks, each designed to hold three bicycles,for a total of 69 bike-carrying slots across the bus fleet. 2. Installation: Upon procurement,the existing two-bike racks on all 23 Key West buses will be removed and replaced with the upgraded three-bike racks. 3. Alignment with Transit Buses:The new racks will be aligned with the buses to ensure bicycles are transported safely and securely. 4. Testing and Safety Assurance: After installation,thorough testing and safety checks will be conducted to ensure that the new racks are properly secured and meet safety standards. S. Integration with Existing Transit Services:The project will ensure seamless integration of the upgraded bike racks with the existing transit services, making it convenient for passengers to transport their bicycles. 6. Project Timeline:The entire project is expected to be completed within a timeline of approximately six months, from procurement to installation to project closeout. 2764 18uf40L SUPPORTING INFORMATION By doubling the bike-carrying capacity on Key West buses,this project will significantly improve accessibility and convenience for cyclists, meeting the growing demand for eco-friendly transportation options in the community. It will encourage more residents and visitors to utilize bicycles as a mode of transportation, ultimately reducing traffic congestion and promoting a sustainable and cyclist-friendly Key West. It is the intention of the City of Key West to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for delivering the project.The City of Key West is committed to ensuring the success and sustainability of the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project. We proudly provide our project certification and attached resolution (RESOLUTION NO. 23-311), affirming our authorization to submit this proposal.The information presented is accurate and in alignment with our intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved bike rack facilities. Additionally, we are dedicated to adhering to all federal and state requirements, guaranteeing the responsible and compliant execution of this project. Key West is wholeheartedly invested in enhancing our transportation infrastructure, promoting eco-friendly commuting, and contributing to a more sustainable and cyclist-friendly community for all residents and visitors. 19 of 40L2765 RESOLUTION NO. 23-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF XEY WEST, FLORIDA, TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT GRANT FUNDING FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Key West Forward Strategic Plan, Key West Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan all call for increased alternative transportation amenities; and. WHEREAS, staff has identified grant funding through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) - Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program;; and WHEREAS, the FDOT TA grant application calls for a resolution of support and funding for any project submitted; and WHEREAS, City staff has identified two projects : Bus Bike Racks and Island Wide Wayfi ding Planning; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the City of Key West approves of the projects and directs staff to apply for the grant . Section 2 : That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement. Section 3: That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the appropriate project costs, including matching funds, will 1 2766 be programmed into the appropriate Fiscal Year in the City' s Transportation Alternative Fund (TAF) . The Bus Bike Racks total cost is > 75, 000 . 00 of which the City' s 209. match is $15, 000 .00. The Wayfinding Plan total cost is $200, 000. 00 of which the City' s 20% match is $40, 000 . 00. Section 4 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the Presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 9th day of November r 2023 . Authenticated by the Presiding Officer and Clerk of the Commission on9thday of November , 2023. Filed with the Clerk on November 2023. Mayor Teri Johnston Yes Vice Mayor Sam Kaufman Yes Commissioner Lissette Carey Yes Commissioner Mary Lou Hoover Yes Commissioner Clayton Lopez Yes Commissioner Billy Wardlow Yes Commissioner We e�ley —Yes T7,RI JOHNSTON/' MAYOR ATTE'-" KERI O' BRIEN, CITY CLERK 2 2767 2,3 a Aga � .4Or � t r MEMORANDUM Date: November 9,2023 To: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners Via: Albert P.Childress" City Manager From: Katie Halloran Planning Director Subject: Approval of 2 grant applications for Florida Department of Transportation -Transportation Alternatives Program. Introduction Traffic and Pedestrian Friendliness is one of the top 6 goals of the Key West Forward Strategic Plan. To this end, City staff are constantly monitoring poLe€atial grants for funding that can help us achieve action items from the Strategic Plan, as well as the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan. The recent grant opportunity, announced by the Florida Dept of Transportation (FDOT) — Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program calls for a resolution of support as part of the application package, due December f'h, 2023. This resolution supports two projects,directs staff to apply for FDOT TA funding,and directs the City Manager to allocate total project costs, including matching funds, in the fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds and execute agreements and supplemental agreements,if awarded. Bacic;roand The City has successfully applied to the FDOT TA grant program in years past, although this is the first year a resolution has been required in the application package. The projects are usually allocated towards the end of FDOT's 5-year planning horizon but can be sooner. The Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan was completed through a TA grant and recommended the 3 currently funded/scheduled TA projects:Final Mile(amenities at bus stops),Wickers Parr Realignment and the Salt Ponds Pathways Feasibility. This year, staff wisps to apply for two projects:New bike racks on Transit buses, which will increase capacity by 200%; and Wayfinding Planning, which will design island wide guidance for pedestrians,bicyclists, bus riders and.drivers. 2768 Procurement There is a 20% match mandated for the FDOT TA grants. This resolution will denote not only Commission support for the projects, but also for the City to set aside the appropriate total project costs, including matching funds, from the City's Transportation Alternative Fund(TAF) once the City knows which fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds. • The Bus Bike Racks total cost is$75,000.00,of which the City's 20%match is$15,0000,00. • The Wayfinding Plan total cost is$200,000.00 of which the City's 20%match is 40,000,00. FDOT Transportation Alternative grants are reimbursement grants. Recommendation The City Manager's Office recommends that the City Commission approve this resolution, thereby supporting the projects,directing staff to apply for the FDOT TA grant,and directing the City Manager to execute the agreements and supplemental agreements, should the projects be awarded funds. 2769 REQUIRIED IUIPLO,AD.,AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e,q.^exoerpt pages fromi adopted plans or stuidies,imiaps>lliustraftg transit facififies and connecti0ty to the�rnprovemerrt,mhort staternent of support with a s�gnatummuf the school official and their contact Unfonmabmm for SRTS piroje�cts,median hmusehoNdLmicome lby cammum tract for community bemeffting,cmUsiomhoatmmaps I crash data for area smmommd/mg project KimQm,otc.). The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project fulfills goals across three separate, but intrinsically related City of Key West Plans;the Key West Forward:The Strategic Plan for the City of Key West 2021' 2024, CityofKeyVVeotTranoitDeve|opmentP|anMajorUpdate2020-2029, andtheKeyVVeotBicyde' PedeotrianMaoterP|an2019. Key West Forward:The Strategic Plan for the City of Key West 2021'2024: The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project aligns seamlessly with Key West Forward's strategic goals and priorities. Specifically, it contributes to Priority6:Traffic& Pedestrian Friendliness, aiming to enhance the ease and safety of residents and visitors as they navigate the island. Under Goal 1: Complete Streets,the project fulfills the objective of ensuring safer and more accessible bicycle and pedestrian routes in accordance with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. By doubling the bike- carrying capacity on buses, it also directly supports Goal 2: Improve Public Transit, by increasing bicycle carrying capacity which encourages more mu|timoda| ridership. Moreover, by promoting the use of bicycles and reducing the reliance on personal vehicles,the project indirectly advances Goal 3: Parking Improvements and Goal 4: Reduce the Island's Carbon Footprint,thereby aligning with the city's broader ouotainabi|ityefforto. City of Key West Transit Development Plan Major Update 2020-2029: The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project plays a pivotal role in the Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update for Key West, responding directly to the community's vision for transit and mobility improvements. During a visioning workshop with city commissioners, it was unanimously agreed that transit services could be enhanced to benefit residents, workers, and tourists. One of the top concerns expressed was traffic congestion and parking, both of which are addressed by this project. Additionally, theprcjectoupportotheexpanoionofbicyde'carryingcapadtyonbuoeo, improvingfirot/|aot'mi|e connections, a concept that was well-received during discussions. It closely aligns with the TDP's goals and objectives, including providing effective, efficient, and safe transit services (Goal 1), sustaining and enhancing infrastructure (Goal 3), seeking additional funding options (Goal 5), and reducing environmental impacts while promotingouotainabi|ity (Goal 7). By investing inthis project,the City of Key West directly fulfills the community's transit vision aooutlined in the TDP Major Update. Key West Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan 2019: The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project fits seamlessly into the Key West Bicycle- Pedestrian Master P|an'oGoa| 1: (improving)Accessibility and Mobility, and the overarching objective of enhancing multimodal connectivity. Recognizing the importance of integrating various transportation modes,the project aligns with the plan's emphasis on creating an efficient and well-functioning mu|timoda| network. By doubling the bike-carrying capacity on buses,this project significantly contributes to making Key West more accessible and convenient for cyclists and pedestrians alike. It addresses safety concerns identified in the plan by improving transit services for workers, and offering more frequent and dependable transit options. Furthermore,the project supports the plan's goals of 2770 24uf40L promoting safety,technology integration, shared economies,transit improvements, and overall accessibility, all of which are critical components of Key West's journey towards becoming a more cyclist and pedestrian-friendly city. Due to their length, each of these plans are attached separately in the "Additional Documents" section. 25 of 40L2771 REQUIRED UPLOAD: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g,resollution, proctamation, regulady scheduled meleting agends and minutes,public meeting adverfisement, community siurvey,letters lof support,etc.). Public involvement and support for the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity iO Key West project 8rerObU3t and well-documented, reflecting a significant desire within the community for enhanced alternative transportation amenities. The project has received official backing through Resolution No. 23-311, demonstrating the City Commission's approval and authorization for staff to apply for and accept grant funding from the Florida Department of Transportation's Transportation Alternatives Program. This resolution emphasizes the alignment of the project with the Key West Forward Strategic Plan, the Key West Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, and the Transit Development Plan, indicating that the project fulfills key priorities outlined in these plans. It showcases a clear commitment from the dty's leadership to improving alternative transportation options. Public engagement efforts have played a vital role in shaping the project. TheCityCornrnission Visioning Workshop in March 2019 highlighted the importance of enhancing transit services and increasing the bike-carrying capacity on buses to facilitate first/last mile connections, directly echoing the project's goals. Additionally, the City Multimodal Transportation Coordinator has been responsive to community requests, particularly those related toaccommodating different bicycle types and receiving similar feedback through social media channels. These interactions underscore the project's resonance with the public and its potential to address their specific needs and concerns. The Key West Bicycle-Peclestri an Master Plan's engagement strategies further validate the project's alignment with community aspirations. Through public open houses, stakeholder interviews, comment boards, email surveys, and an interactive online map, residents and visitors have had numerous opportunities to express their opinions and provide feedback. The feedback received consistently supports the need for improvements in walking and biking infrastructure, with a focus on safety, complete streets, connectivity, mobility, and vvayfinding. These findings reinforce the pr jeot's objectives ofenhancing bicycle transit and encouraging more sustainable modes of transportation. Furthermore, public involvement in budget meetings has demonstrated a recurring theme—the expansion of bus bike rack capacity is a pressing need for the community. This consensus underscores the demand for increased cycling opportunities and highlights the practicality and benefits of this project in improving transit services and enhancing mobility for residents and tourists alike. 2772 28uf40L RESOLUTION NO. 23-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF XEY WEST, FLORIDA, TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT GRANT FUNDING FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Key West Forward Strategic Plan, Key West Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan all call for increased alternative transportation amenities; and. WHEREAS, staff has identified grant funding through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) - Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program;; and WHEREAS, the FDOT TA grant application calls for a resolution of support and funding for any project submitted; and WHEREAS, City staff has identified two projects : Bus Bike Racks and Island Wide Wayfi ding Planning; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the City of Key West approves of the projects and directs staff to apply for the grant . Section 2 : That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement. Section 3: That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the appropriate project costs, including matching funds, will 1 2773 be programmed into the appropriate Fiscal Year in the City' s Transportation Alternative Fund (TAF) . The Bus Bike Racks total cost is > 75, 000 . 00 of which the City' s 209. match is $15, 000 .00. The Wayfinding Plan total cost is $200, 000. 00 of which the City' s 20% match is $40, 000 . 00. Section 4 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the Presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 9th day of November r 2023 . Authenticated by the Presiding Officer and Clerk of the Commission on9thday of November , 2023. Filed with the Clerk on November 2023. Mayor Teri Johnston Yes Vice Mayor Sam Kaufman Yes Commissioner Lissette Carey Yes Commissioner Mary Lou Hoover Yes Commissioner Clayton Lopez Yes Commissioner Billy Wardlow Yes Commissioner We e�ley —Yes T7,RI JOHNSTON/' MAYOR ATTE'-" KERI O' BRIEN, CITY CLERK 2 2774 2,3 a Aga � .4Or � t r MEMORANDUM Date: November 9,2023 To: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners Via: Albert P.Childress" City Manager From: Katie Halloran Planning Director Subject: Approval of 2 grant applications for Florida Department of Transportation -Transportation Alternatives Program. Introduction Traffic and Pedestrian Friendliness is one of the top 6 goals of the Key West Forward Strategic Plan. To this end, City staff are constantly monitoring poLe€atial grants for funding that can help us achieve action items from the Strategic Plan, as well as the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan. The recent grant opportunity, announced by the Florida Dept of Transportation (FDOT) — Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program calls for a resolution of support as part of the application package, due December 6'h, 2023. This resolution supports two projects,directs staff to apply for FDOT TA funding,and directs the City Manager to allocate total project costs, including matching funds, in the fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds and execute agreements and supplemental agreements,if awarded. Bacic;roand The City has successfully applied to the FDOT TA grant program in years past, although this is the first year a resolution has been required in the application package. The projects are usually allocated towards the end of FDOT's 5-year planning horizon but can be sooner. The Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan was completed through a TA grant and recommended the 3 currently funded/scheduled TA projects:Final Mile(amenities at bus stops),Wickers Parr Realignment and the Salt Ponds Pathways Feasibility. This year, staff wisps to apply for two projects:New bike racks on Transit buses, which will increase capacity by 200%; and Wayfinding Planning, which will design island wide guidance for pedestrians,bicyclists, bus riders and.drivers. 2775 Procurement There is a 20% match mandated for the FDOT TA grants. This resolution will denote not only Commission support for the projects, but also for the City to set aside the appropriate total project costs, including matching funds, from the City's Transportation Alternative Fund(TAF) once the City knows which fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds. • The Bus Bike Racks total cost is$75,000.00,of which the City's 20%match is$15,0000,00. • The Wayfinding Plan total cost is$200,000.00 of which the City's 20%match is 40,000,00. FDOT Transportation Alternative grants are reimbursement grants. Recommendation The City Manager's Office recommends that the City Commission approve this resolution, thereby supporting the projects,directing staff to apply for the FDOT TA grant,and directing the City Manager to execute the agreements and supplemental agreements, should the projects be awarded funds. 2776 REQUIRIED UPLOAD- COINCURRENCY I CONSISTIENCY SUPPORTING ,iU NTA ISO, ( . ;., supporfingi rasWutton(s),exoarpt from oomprehiensive ptanis),transportation ptani(s),capital improvement ptan(s)�, management pdan(s),pidodfizatbin ilist,etc,), As evidence of Key West's comprehensive and well-integrated approach to improving transportation and mobility,the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project demonstrates strong concurrency and consistency with multiple key planning documents and resolutions. The City Commission's Resolution No. 23-311 demonstrates a clear commitment to align with the Florida Department of Transportation's Transportation Alternatives Program (TA).This resolution demonstrates the city's intent to apply for and accept grant funding, highlighting the importance of aligning with state- level transportation initiatives.The City of Key West ensures consistency with state-level transportation priorities by actively seeking external funding for the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project. Moreover,the project seamlessly aligns with Key West Forward:The Strategic Plan for the City of Key West 2021-2024. Priority 6 aims to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety, which contributes to Goal 1's objective of creating complete streets that are safer and more accessible. It underscores the city's commitment to integrating the project with its strategic goals. The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project also complements the City of Key West Transit Development Plan Major Update 2020-2029,which reflects the community's vision for improved transit and mobility. A key concern raised during visioning workshops was traffic congestion and parking. It aligns with the goals and objectives of the Transit Development Plan, including improving transit services (goal 1), enhancing infrastructure (goal 3), seeking additional funding options (goal 5), and reducing environmental impacts (goal 7).Thus,the project is not only consistent with the plan, but also actively contributes to its achievement. Lastly,the project fits naturally within the Key West Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan 2019. By enhancing multimodal connectivity, it aligns with Goal 1 of the master plan, which emphasizes accessibility and mobility. By doubling bike capacity on buses,the project supports the plan's goal of creating a well- functioning multimodal network. Additionally, it addresses safety,technology integration, shared economies,transit improvements, and overall accessibility. Therefore,the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project reinforces the importance and relevance of improving transportation and mobility in Key West by demonstrating strong coordination and consistency with the city's strategic plan, state-level transportation initiatives, and comprehensive transportation plans. 31 of 40L2777 RESOLUTION NO. 23-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF XEY WEST, FLORIDA, TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT GRANT FUNDING FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Key West Forward Strategic Plan, Key West Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan all call for increased alternative transportation amenities; and. WHEREAS, staff has identified grant funding through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) - Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program;; and WHEREAS, the FDOT TA grant application calls for a resolution of support and funding for any project submitted; and WHEREAS, City staff has identified two projects : Bus Bike Racks and Island Wide Wayfi ding Planning; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the City of Key West approves of the projects and directs staff to apply for the grant . Section 2 : That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement. Section 3: That upon approval of the grant application by FDOT, the appropriate project costs, including matching funds, will 1 2778 be programmed into the appropriate Fiscal Year in the City' s Transportation Alternative Fund (TAF) . The Bus Bike Racks total cost is > 75, 000 . 00 of which the City' s 209. match is $15, 000 .00. The Wayfinding Plan total cost is $200, 000. 00 of which the City' s 20% match is $40, 000 . 00. Section 4 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the Presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 9th day of November r 2023 . Authenticated by the Presiding Officer and Clerk of the Commission on9thday of November , 2023. Filed with the Clerk on November 2023. Mayor Teri Johnston Yes Vice Mayor Sam Kaufman Yes Commissioner Lissette Carey Yes Commissioner Mary Lou Hoover Yes Commissioner Clayton Lopez Yes Commissioner Billy Wardlow Yes Commissioner We e�ley —Yes T7,RI JOHNSTON/' MAYOR ATTE'-" KERI O' BRIEN, CITY CLERK 2 2779 2,3 a Aga � .4Or � t r MEMORANDUM Date: November 9,2023 To: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners Via: Albert P.Childress" City Manager From: Katie Halloran Planning Director Subject: Approval of 2 grant applications for Florida Department of Transportation -Transportation Alternatives Program. Introduction Traffic and Pedestrian Friendliness is one of the top 6 goals of the Key West Forward Strategic Plan. To this end, City staff are constantly monitoring poLe€atial grants for funding that can help us achieve action items from the Strategic Plan, as well as the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan and the Transit Development Plan. The recent grant opportunity, announced by the Florida Dept of Transportation (FDOT) — Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program calls for a resolution of support as part of the application package, due December 6'h, 2023. This resolution supports two projects,directs staff to apply for FDOT TA funding,and directs the City Manager to allocate total project costs, including matching funds, in the fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds and execute agreements and supplemental agreements,if awarded. Bacic;roand The City has successfully applied to the FDOT TA grant program in years past, although this is the first year a resolution has been required in the application package. The projects are usually allocated towards the end of FDOT's 5-year planning horizon but can be sooner. The Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan was completed through a TA grant and recommended the 3 currently funded/scheduled TA projects:Final Mile(amenities at bus stops),Wickers Parr Realignment and the Salt Ponds Pathways Feasibility. This year, staff wisps to apply for two projects:New bike racks on Transit buses, which will increase capacity by 200%; and Wayfinding Planning, which will design island wide guidance for pedestrians,bicyclists, bus riders and.drivers. 2780 Procurement There is a 20% match mandated for the FDOT TA grants. This resolution will denote not only Commission support for the projects, but also for the City to set aside the appropriate total project costs, including matching funds, from the City's Transportation Alternative Fund(TAF) once the City knows which fiscal year FDOT has programmed the grant funds. • The Bus Bike Racks total cost is$75,000.00,of which the City's 20%match is$15,0000,00. • The Wayfinding Plan total cost is$200,000.00 of which the City's 20%match is 40,000,00. FDOT Transportation Alternative grants are reimbursement grants. Recommendation The City Manager's Office recommends that the City Commission approve this resolution, thereby supporting the projects,directing staff to apply for the FDOT TA grant,and directing the City Manager to execute the agreements and supplemental agreements, should the projects be awarded funds. 2781 REQUIREDUPLOAD for Infrastructure i appliciable For I)-.ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATIONSUPPORTING ' (a.g.r lableted ptnctographis on reaps depVctiting co nrtflons (permits,copy of the entire sturdy or ani nnrorume ntM assessment„excerpt pages from adopted plans„etc.),. Due to its nature as a transportation infrastructure improvement project with negligible or even nonexistent environmental impact,the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project does not require an environmental assessment.The project involves upgrading bike racks on buses to accommodate more bicycles, without affecting the natural environment or causing significant construction activities. According to City policy,the old bike racks that are being discontinued will be disposed of responsibly. Additionally,the project aligns with the broader goals of promoting sustainable transportation and reducing carbon footprints,which are likely to have positive effects on the environment. Given the relatively low potential for adverse environmental effects and the project's alignment with environmental sustainability objectives, it falls within the category of projects that typically do not necessitate a comprehensive environmental study or assessment. 36 of 40L2782 REQUIRED 'UPLO,AD,for Inter astructure,(not applIcalblefor Nil), OWNERSHIP IROW STATU'S SUPPORTING DOCIUMIENTATION includingapiplicable ROWCertfficafion tincluidingowners,hipvorification documenting site control and related landowner supporting docuirnentation,Site,control documents imust inctude an adequate legal descrIption of the parcei(s),comprising the projecl site,such tlhait staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is conitrol of the project site(e,g,ROW Certification,ROW maps, p1lats,warrainty deeds,prescriptions,certified surveys,easements,use agreement,,etc.),Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership In relation to the project boundary and I or limits,NOTE:provide map,documentation on 8,5"x I VscaW DO,NOT provide reduced coples,of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. It applicable,an exhibit visually depictnij the now ROW anticipated for tho project,togothor with a spreadlshieot providing the taix Identification number(s)of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcell. The requirement for the submission of ownership and right-of-way(ROW) status documentation is not applicable to the Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project.This project primarily involves the installation of bike racks on existing buses and does not entail land acquisition, significant changes to right-of-way, or alterations to property ownership.Therefore,there are no pertinent ownership or ROW-related issues associated with this project. Consequently,the submission of ownership verification and related landowner documentation is not relevant in this context. 37 of 40L 2783 Engineer's Estimate The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project does not necessitate an engineer's estimate due to its specific nature and scope. This project primarily involves the procurement and installation of bike racks on existing buses, which can be adequately cost-estimated through vendor quotes and proposals. The project's simplicity and straightforwardness in terms of equipment acquisition and installation make it unnecessary to engage in a comprehensive engineer's estimate process. The vendor quote that will be provided as an attachment will serve as a reliable and accurate cost assessment for the project, ensuring transparency and precision in budgeting and financial planning. Therefore, the project's unique characteristics and the availability of vendor quotes make the engineer's estimate redundant for this initiative. Timeline Key West's transportation infrastructure enhancements will be implemented in a timeline designed to ensure efficiency. As part of the initial phase, we will execute a sub-recipient agreement and procure the necessary equipment and services for the project during a three- month period. In the following three months, we install bike racks on our buses in-house, ensuring that our entire fleet is equipped for cyclists. Our grant closeout process will take three months, ensuring compliance with grant requirements and preparing for the successful conclusion of this valuable initiative. The timeline reflects our commitment to a smooth and timely execution, ensuring that the benefits of increased bike rack capacity on our buses are realized quickly and effectively. The project will take nine months in total to complete. 38 of 40L2784 IREQUINRED UPILOAD forNinfrastructuro (il appl for Nil). Typil Section(s)depichng existing and proposed features,dimensions,and ROW'll Ifdheire are multip$esegments,provide tyl sections for each, If awaillallprmvidle design plans, The Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity in Key West project's straightforward and minimalistic scope does not warrant the submission of typical sections or design plans.This project primarily involves the installation of bike racks on existing buses to enhance transportation options for cyclists,which does not necessitate extensive design specifications or modifications to existing infrastructure.The proposed work consists of retrofitting buses with standardized bike rack systems, and these installations can be performed without the need for detailed typical sections ordesign plans. As such,the prcject'o simplicity and minimal impact on existing infrastructure make the submission of typical sections and design plans irrelevant in this context, ensuring a streamlined and efficient application process. 2785 3yuf40L • WestForward The Strategic Plan for of Key West 2021-2024 K� '� yllllf , irr l�. ,r,fYNll, I t. fA� r 1 yr r i/r/vii'U ilr0/ � r/ r it y � ro ,y Submitted by Elisa Levy Consulting • • 40 of 40L2786 KEY WEST 11 k% IF'NO V I Acknowledgements This plan was produced over a nine-month period, beginning in December 2020. The final document includes input from thousands of community members, City Commissioners, City of Key West staff, technical experts, personnel from non-profit organizations, academics, businesspeople, Key West High School students, Monroe County employees, and leaders from other municipalities. A list of names would take up volumes. A huge thanks goes to the Department Heads in the City of Key West, who spent hours in meetings fine-tuning the plan, and engaging in lively and sometimes exhausting debates. The City Commission also played an integral part in the process. Without their initiative, vision and desire to preserve the future, this endeavor would never have taken place. We owe a special thanks to Sustainability Coordinator, Alison Higgins, to whom all strategic planning roads lead. Throughout the process, a core group of people met almost every week. They spent much time in the weeds of the plan, pushing through small details, and reaching for big ideas. This team includes Mayor Teri Johnston, City Manager Patti McLauchlin, Assistant City Manager Todd Stoughton, Finance Director Mark Finigan, and Planning Director Katie Halloran. This small team of committed individuals has the intellect worthy of any great city's strategic plan, and the fortitude to see it through. 1 41 of 40L2787 KEY WEST 11 % IFNO V I Table of Contents Introduction p.1 Part I: The Six Priorities p.4 1. Affordable Housing p.5 2. Sea Level Rise p.12 3. Streets and Sidewalks p.20 4. Environmental Protection p.24 S. Cleanliness p.33 6. Traffic & Pedestrian Friendliness p.38 Part II: Major Projects p.45 Part III: Communication Strategy p.48 Part IV: Employee Plan p.56 Annexes p.64 42 of 40L2788 The Rationale for a Strategic Plan Many of the challenges the world faces today are exemplified in Key West. As temperatures increase globally and sea levels rise, Key West is amongst one of the most potentially imperiled areas in the nation. According to reports from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Monroe is the third most vulnerable county in the U.S. for displaced persons due to sea level rise.' In housing, the island fares similarly. Key West is a prime example of a city with an affordable housing and concurrent labor crisis. Approximately 50% of residences are second and third homes, and the average median income (AMI) that qualifies for workforce housing (80%) is well above the average person's salary in Key West.2 Many workers can't afford to live in Paradise. Between March 2020 and May 2021, Key West lost almost 2,000 members of the workforce, bringing the labor crisis to unprecedented heights.' While residents cherish the island's beauty and the nearby coral reef, there is much more effort required to contribute to the circular economy. Only 50% of businesses recycle, solar power is used minimally and the City hauls out all of its solid waste. These challenges are a call to action. Preserving the future of Key West requires a proactive approach, long-term thinking and financial forecasting. In 2021, a strategic plan for Key West is no longer an option; it's a necessity. The Process for Creating Key West Forward A sound strategic plan is like a good recipe: It requires the right ingredients to work. Those ingredients include in-depth community input, guidance from City staff, technical advice from subject matter experts, examples from other municipalities, a funding plan, a monitoring and accountability plan, and guidance from top level leadership. If even one of these ingredients is missing, the product will suffer, and potentially fail. The City's strategic plan, named by a guiding committee, Key West Forward, followed the recipe. The process involved eight steps: ' U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,2018 z According to Shimberg Center data in 2021,80%of AMI equals a salary of$56,000 per year,yet more than 10,000 jobs in Key West pay less than$40,000. s Key West Chamber of Commerce data Spring,2021 1 43 of 40L2789 KEY WEST 11 % IFNO V I 1101�� �I- w m „W 4�1} ,, ,��illll V III (IIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIII VVVVVVVVVVVOVV���Vu98¢ "��illll IIIIIIIII (III II IIIIII II IIIIII VV� llllm�. IIIpIIIIIIY,IIIIIII .���Illlllllulllilllllllll II�IIIIIIIIII .���Illlllllulllilllllllll IIIIIII The Sections of Key West Forward The format for this strategic plan was built on the unique needs of Key West. Most strategic plans focus on priority areas and major projects. In the case of Key West Forward, two additional sections were required: An Employee Plan and a City Communication Strategy. Following the January community survey, the City initiated an internal employee survey.The results confirmed the need for an internal plan to boost morale, increase pay, and hire more employees in some departments. Both the community and staff surveys confirmed the need for City leadership to do a better job of communication. As a result, these two non-traditional, but necessary sections have been added to Key West Forward. The sections of the entire plan include: Sen;ton k II he y II�IrIiorlities 1. Affordable Housing 2. Sea Level Rise 3. Roads and Sidewalks 4. Environmental Protection 5. Cleanliness 6. Traffic & Pedestrian Friendliness Sen;ton �k II\Aauor II Ir uects Sen;ton ffl: II he Cornrnuinucaton Strategy Sen;ton N: II he Il!irnpIl yaTM e Il'llanl 2 44 of 40L2790 KEY WEST 11 dui IFN0 I?I Ensuring the Success of Key West Forward: Commitment, Operational Plans and Funding In August 2020, on the night the contract was awarded for the strategic plan, Commissioner Kaufman noted that he carried around the 2011 plan around in his backpack for months after he was elected, but was never asked about it. He ended his point by asking: "How can we be sure that I will take this plan out of my backpack?" Taking the plan out of our backpacks means putting systems in place for monitoring and accountability. Key West Forward includes annual operational plans for every action item, and a process for regular monitoring guided by the consultant and the City Manager. (See annex 1). Still, the plan is only as good as leadership's support of it. To the greatest extent possible, Key West Forward should be followed as the main path in the coming years. If an initiative that requires major funding or staff time is deemed necessary, the Commission should consider which initiative(s) will be put on hold in exchange. With operational plans in place, and support from the Commission, there is only one more requirement to see the plan through: Funding. Many of the projects the City may initiate on sea level rise and environmental protection will require resources that far exceed the capacity of the general fund. Long term financial forecasting of at least 10 years is a perquisite for such endeavors as road and structural elevation, solar energy, and capital improvements to the Fire Station, MLK Pool, and Jose Marti Blvd.That financial forecasting must be completed during the life-span of the current plan. The strategic plan laid out in this document was born from months of thorough exploration and discourse on best practices. The actions that follow will impact us now and for generations to come.The process was inclusive;the discussions were passionate and contentious; and the results are nothing less than vital. It is a work all those involved should be proud of, even before the real work begins. 3 45 of 40L2791 KEY WEST 11 r% IFNO V I Part I: The 6 Priorities Things w1hich n7c7tt rnrrr. t rnust never be c7t the rn rcy of things w1hich n7c7tt r lecis°I. - Jdharirie Wdfgarigiir Goedhem G irirn iir poet arid II II w iris III t 1. Affordable Housing 2. Sea Level Rise 3. Streets and Sidewalks 4. Environmental Protection S. Cleanliness 6. Traffic and Pedestrian Friendliness w a � Y u A// J / P / acf I/ 4 46 of 40L2792 M ti N _O ro E -0 M T E cu ro 0 CU N O c O roa1 m "p cu N two tOo u O O u a1 a) O vi 41 ro "Ocu o c Q inn• .� -L U LL to Q Om t/)• m ON 4? I cv- �n co c s •Ll � o 0 c � 0 p G1 N CU O CD Z U m O C cu NJ ,, no to y fC 0' O H °1 to = co to c Z CU W W C s L a c c s V M iL L L ~ s ui Z a QN CLN � i+ G P CD > CD CU m cu .a N m1�('l N m N v 0 � + O to nA vi a1 Q a1 nA "CS Q j 4� M i O to C cu co +� co co N Co M s 'n a u a1 O L E N op m E � N O c O = O O O C Q O c +� to c O M N O b4 +- to L to +� cu +•� v = V c ro L V > N O v O y Z - O c -p c 41 3 41 G1 G1 �WWW 22 a LAW Ln = F w E v O� ro OCU U. EQ E _ i 41 Q O .; O O a cc o cu A � r CL +, O o °' v �' O d CU C r O c O v o W +� ° c > E > ca vN—i Q�i O O o v v .N N ro txo cu v v o p p c o N c o >cu4 J cum Co L v 0 ro � cu cbjo ua F p O ro � .� "p nA `' m O } U F r U a1 M O Co "a a N C Wcu O mU 41 W � N N F a y 0 nA O Q W 41 c 41 w cu 0 ro w ro ro -a c H = c =co ��o u�o ov O a V cu cj U O A OoL o Q — �' y i N a > O Q 4' d t6 CL U vi >, W >• o fl 41 t6 m 41 +, C 41 41 C u 41.E u H U _ = tw to v u U 'v� c no > v Ln a, �ii�lllll�� a� 'uvnn '"U ncn ni � ncn z ` s 0 cu ° }- i ro N cN _n - cu E ~ U.1 G 0 L L c N 'N nA cu to f6 pp ca C C X p � a ON E w = Q = � v v c c aa) o -a N n 5iji y C0 s c N > �o a LL a �' Q a C7 U ti CN 0 tLo a ro -0 ro Ln Ln Ln Ln cu cu u u 0 cu 0 cu Z C Z b3 C .E cu 0 0 ro E CN Up CD ro 0 ro 0 w 0 T 0 0 0 0 +, E u CC) r (co: cu:O "U E i w W w 0 w C u C 'ZZ C: o 'Eb -0 t -1 C: o C: C: ro 0 ��e U a- w to 0- 0 ro Z rj C: r,4 r14 W 0 cu co r14 co r14 0 cu (U E tn' 0 L E L;-: cu :t cu = w E 0 +, 0 ro o = 4- -0 .u 0 wl E ZA u E -Lu e u + CU — Q- W b4 cu 0 b4 cu :E C: c E -0 Lh �t 0 ro 0 ro E 0 c u E 'n ro w 'n M 0 0 0 C: E c u ro cu cu 0- ro = " 0 +1 — E ro 0 C- +, CU fa w U 0 c C: -0 r,4 Ul — LL E CU 0 u C) (.0 0 CU > Ln Iz aJ 0 0 E 6 0 > CU H 'n b3 >. cu -2 cu 4� a -0 cu 0 0 ro -Fo 0 (U 0 0 CU cu ro CU u 0 ro 'ZI C: Ln -0 = 0 0 cu m 3: o u ro u_a +, > > ro cu CU a) (.0 0 cu 0 cu 0 4-� 0 L) 0 > cr CU ui c E ro ro V� 4� 0 C ro 4� r14 , ro ro 0 U V) ro 4- iv C: cacu c Ln -0 QL ro 0 u o D -0 r 0 o Q- M 0 W 0 E r 4-j Z 0 ro cu C: C -,: o. Q- E 0 < b4 E q-- uo c M u I cu ro >- cu E o 4L C: S M cu 0 0 CL E ro E ro o CU C: " ro a) :t 0 -0 (U 0 > (D C- = C: Ln a) " CU +1 ro cu CL u cu -0 o tw W r-, > Ln cu ro c — — E 0 cu 4- txo c QL a Lr)(1) a ro Ln 0 .0 0 to -0 — ro UO 0 0- -a ro cu +, C)- 4� CU C: W C 0 U 0 W o ro F- 0 ro fa cu CU o Eo Lu C: E +30 —Q- 0 0 ro r-I 5 4- ro ro ro 0) E > ro 2 0 CU -0 — u CU r,4 o E J- CU I:T m 0 +' >- 0 0 u cu -0 0 4 4- 1 +- 0 0 cu cu -0 bD 4- — 0 txo 4- < 4- E a >- cu cu — 0 Ln LLJ Ln CU W u c 0 0 b.0 :E > Ln W .0 C 0 cu 0 Ln z ro 0 S CL Ln M > —i CU ro E cu +1 ro +� a) -0 Co 0 o E CU CU Ln ro b.0 c b4 �5iji Ln 0 -a 4,Z cu t�: cu cu CO CO +, F- to to to w L L CO rH co ro LO ti CN W cu E qj-)- C: cu cu -0 0'. -0 ro -0 W cu CU cu CD 0 Co rj rfi 41 w ro r�4 Q- lu CD > 0 Ln 0 >� cu E ro CU >- cu ro ro cu r,4 u ro +1 0 4- ro ru 0 m CU C: U- C: L 41 E .2 0 CU O cu CU Ln 0 CU CU 0 r,4 n C: " u C C: Lu E E u qj-)- LL 0 0- to to cu tw cro ro tw C u +1 qp C CN to <L = c 76 0 N CD b.0 c c ro :3 > 0 cu 0 c 0 W �:- = +, 0 4 4� CY) -j u u a- b4 " ro b4 ro I;T CAAW 41 cu -5 E c C: c Eb ` E u o u o uo ��e co a- a- Uj Ln r,4 b.0 b.0 c b.0 b.0 c bD .0 — c c cu — c Ln M rr� 0 '- 0 .- r-j 0 bD W '7- r,4 W LL r,4 W c cu QL 0 c cu >. 0 C: ro u 0 CO Lo r,4 0 r) -0 r,4 -0 o LL 112 CU -r3 c 0 -0 cu ro cu 4- > cu > ro 'n 0 cu 0 r- ro = ro CU r) -0 = QL u LL ro a Q- OC QL L C ro 0 to Ea1 Q- C: C: ro 0 m o CU E CU - Ln ro -14 0 >- >7u cu ro -S-- CU CD -0 CU Ln 0 Co 41 .0 0 -Z, Q) Ln c CU > ro 3: CU 0 Q) ro Q- Ln a ro 41 0 0 Ln -0 +1 c E w Ln CU E c ro 0 ro Q) -0 Q) E 0 ro 0 +, -0 E -a -0 0 u +1 to C: Q- 0 0 Ll "0 0 cu — u to 0 0 0 0 — 7u cu 0 ci > 0 0 cr- �E cu CU w S� o- 0 U 0 x U Wa) W W -r3 Q- cu W Lo to 0 CA 0 W CU r a) cu a- c 0 Ln cu+1 w E w x CU LU E 0 CL CU -j cu Q) E .2 ro ilo Q) (3) cu z -a ro Z- Ln > x E 0 0) ui 0 +, 0 CL 0) III N Q) c ro 0 Q) 0 r 4� cu U N a .- " E QL I- ro cu cu 0 u Ln U; cu Z; 0 E :; -2� S-- 0' > o 0 U.J > Q- 0 ro 0 ro Ln C)- 0- CA +, C3 ro CA c- ui -cu 0 a) CU z E > 0 U 0 two Ln U 0 cu 4= cu 0 CU Q. a) U ��5ij ro z ro C 0 ro N ro 0 Qj cp ti CN W ro cu r) r) 0 u cu Z c cu b.0 4. +; 4, c C c to Ln ro ro ro (N 0 CD 0 -0 4 r) = ro — , +, 0 o —ro 0 u c u u u CD ro w b.0 w b.0 cu b.0 LO b.0 C LL :3 CU 7a O C: o 0 0 o X Q- u w 0 0 b4 'Z, c W W ro —0 c 4� r14 7 Eb C r,4 c 0 r14 0 a -z: r,4 bb L r14 W x cu CD cu C)- 0 c QL CD c L.Li -0 r14 CO v) r,4 0 V) r14 0 +- -2 a) tn O cu cu ro cu c +, >- -0 Ln cu co ro 0 ui E • cu 0 Ln Ln cu ro cu cu E 'r-o E cu o Ln ro C: Ln CU 4- 0 ro " ro ro cu o cu ro cu 0 0 41 — 'ZI cu 0 4- u Ln -0 0 :-2 4- cu ro cu 0 . to 0 = - .+, ro �E +1 ro 2 3: 0 40 -1 4- CU W Ln Ln r+10 . E cu cu to c Q- 0 +1 0 +1 i7n E2 c= " Ln cu -0 ro CU 0 0.— Q- cu Ln cu > 0 CU 0 DL -W a cu cu cu 0 L- -F ro -0 0 v v 0- Ln 0- " = a) 4- 0 cu -0 0 = 0 Ln W = > cu 0 cr 0 -0 CU Ln cu CU ro -0 4- 3u E ro 0 -0 cu cu ro m .§ = = ro b4 u .. = x c T 0- ro W o w 0 Ln a) — -2 +1 Ln -f5 m to 0- 7a E .2 �E ro c -0 W .2 -0 x cu cu L- m ro a) -0 m C -0 cn c: E 0 -0 to a) 4� r) ro Q- co > cu > ro 0 cu -0 c cu ro ro F- -0 > :t cu ro it o cu b.0 t c > 0 •T 0 :t > ro cu 4� 0 4� dJ cu -0 :3 -0 0 b.0 Ln m T L- cu ro 0 0 0 0iii 0 U L- m a -0 c cu 0 co E cu C ro Co 0) ro ro — " L- m 0 0 M 0 CU 0 a) lu c - r- = = ,-o -0 cu o E 0 0 = 0 cu ro - 0 .% 0 QL 0 ro 0 cu (A 0 0 0 0 .0 4- (1) c cu ro ro 4� ro ro 0 0 c Ln ro QL W "C:U m -0 i7i -CC -0 cu 0 QL cu cu ro CU 0 4 '43. 0 Ln = wtD 4- 1 4- ti ti CN r14 r14 cu r-i 4� Ln Z a) uo ro o 0 0 C 0 CU CU W 4�cu 4�cu c cu cu -Z, W �le b.0 �le ro 0 C: -0 CD Ln t�: 0 (3) :3 Ln r-, CU 41). m 41). b.0 (N E CU CU (3) C CD E ro " ro u w 21 C: E 0 b4 I r_n ro W = < E C: 0 UJ 0 LO 0 E 0 T 0 ro 0 u ro ro u CU CU ro 7/1 Ln > C: CU to -0 to 0 - 0 ro 0 0 U 0 0 cu a- CL �le C LL u W CL o c I r-i 0 ro Fu ImIll, LL r,4 bp 0 c C (3)r3 co r14 0 LL LL c -0 -. cu >- 0 ro -jO cu E -a cu cu O cu ro 0O U 7aQ w .!i� r_n C to 0 LO u 7n Ll cu cu 0 CL > +1 E " -r3 Ln Ln 0 QL 0 a) cu -1 ��e CA " o LL C3 Ln QLCor cu z CL 0 E 0 (A Ln 41 cr- 0 -0 D 4� ro 0 'Z7i 0 Q- CU Z E 0 Z ro Ln 0 C- CU z M CU CU C: ro (U Ln +1 0 Ln +1 x 0 0 ui o —i E cu ui C3 tw ro 0 W cu m cu C 4- 0 W a ro Ln ON C: 0 > CU m CL (3) 0 (3) ro M ro c o bp i,o UJ Z 7/1 w r) Cit Ll Ln C 0 2 E 0 cu 0 E L` LU Z = ro 0 c 0 ro m m CD (u ro ui Se 0 ro 0) 41 >- 00 > 0 a) 0 c > no fa cic r_n -0 :E +ro cr- E LU ui CU ro U x (A 0 ro 0 — ui 0 0 CL cic E fot CL 0 0 co :; CU CL ��5jim (A co co E Z I co Ln N ro co 0) I- CN ro ro ro Ln Ln Ln r) Ln Ln Ln cu cu cu cu -0 m H cu cu cu >. " I c c c ro o E W W W w ,u cu CU cr 4- 0 0 0 cu cu z z z QJ ro CN (U ro ro 0 CD u:t rr C� 0 (U 0 0 0 .2 C:u u U 21 Ln 0) .Ln w W W 0 4- CU CU o E c: < E 0 0 O tJ 4- 0 0 to 2i u < QL u < -r3 a -r3 W c: r,4 w W CS N cN cu ai r,4 E tw r,4 r14 s r,4 r14 ClA tmw -a E LO r,4 Fz E r,4 tw r,4 Q) Q) 0 >- 0 Q) cu co " Ll 0 LL U rq CO Lo r,4 co Lo r,4 r) r14 O -S-- EO CU W 0 to th cu thisC: uo cu -0 cu Lr) C +1 to 0 0 CU 0 w Ln E ` -0 0 -0 to Q) ro -r3 ro C: X Q) r,4 ro cu o CU cu -0 L6 0 cu +, c 0 +1 >- E cu cr cu r14 -F 0 to -0 W cu 0 o L- o CU CU — x c E r,4 cu cu ro 4- 0 ro ro ro E c 0 :t CL E cu 0 Q- tw r14 W cu u Ln Ln ro " E — (>U cu CU cu 0- 0- c ro — f.n .7 0 1 CU 4- :�� W r,4 0 p E CU 0 Ll 0 CU -0 ro >� CL > ro Lo cu X > N0 0 CU E C: tw -0 Ln M ro ro uiL th .2 -0 CU cu CL Coro CU 77; cu Co cic Ll CU 0 cu " w ro 0- 0 D z Ln +, Q) >- (A CU E = cu :t E Co — cu E tL- -r3 o E c m w Co CU -j 0 CU +, ro = 0 S cu x c -r3 w 0- c c -0 75 +1 CU CU >- b4 CL x cu ro 0 cu ro X E LU +1 +1 cu " ro ro ro M tw 0 M +, ro CU 0 ro ro M — cic z CU cu 0 cu E u c E L c 0 0 0 7@ -0 cu 0 vi t�: =) Ln -�e 0 ro ro 'n N ro ro M cu Q) CU 0 0 cu .D ro cu cc Q) ro > Ln ro Q) E Q) 0 m " - -a u U -0 = ui Q) Q) 0 ro ro 0 co (.0 cu :E u > 0 Ln x -0 0 U.J Ln Q) cic > ro F- jo 0 -0 cu M m < 0 a) cu 0 4� z L41 QL Ln -J Z7; CU QL 0 4� u 4, D 5- = ro X cA cu M cu < 7a 0 L'o 0 ro ui cu a) ro m cu 0 r " +, cu bz 3: E > L'o Q- 0 < < cu r,4 0 C: 0 L- ro o cu C- &# -0 (V a- — �o -i -r3 j:�' -0 �i m u 0- Co ro C C: LU LA CU 0 cu 10— E 4— ro M cu I.D ro cu o - r,4 x 0 Ln C: x Ln +-; o a- -i &# ro :t 0 < 0 bp �5iji CU 0 CU c t�: a- 4- 1- 0 Lu cf CU � � � q ± ± \ \ § § ? ? _\ _\ 0 0 2 2 � / / cu / / � CU 0 � : / f \ 0 � / : O S ? : \ / \ / s % ƒ = / -0 0 'o q ' f q ° m a q / v) g 0 ZA\ ? k m $ k ° -0 cu 0 CU /in \ 0 \ ƒ k 0 / _/ \ \ k E \ 0 " 2 _0 n ® / ƒ r § ro aL i 0 § j 0 k \ / E n $ « 0 2 2� 3: k o ® . m c m 7 c M # 2 c E 0- aro o m = c ® v ® k 3 ° r § # I E E § 0 e % § m 2 E O » 10 \ 7 E :6 ro 2 2 ƒ { ƒ / ro e �� 2 % 0 / % 1 in / 3 2 n / n � w ■ \ v U 2 / LLJ S = e & ^ 0 2 « o � k a) n c n e e (%« � a- w > L a C) 0 co N C Co v O L > cn O L L Q ro Q Q v VI J N O C > C Ln 41 O to C to L a1 ro�, � � u fa N Z u cu 7 to \ H L u to -p = VI . r-I C) Q d C C C +, C C N cn "O t/? 4— LL U Ov O Q a � I a o s � i1 L uo N O CD+ � qA c� _ w/ 41 O a1 F w — O d +- — O 1i L -aa) ro -0 +, � � � LO Ln W to C C c cro c Eb ,�.f Co C tC N O w C N O ro C N O G1 O - t- ' = O 41 O O ui Z = cn U O CL U cn U cn U cn U O41 ui C J a) cu + Q N O to to nA i Z �; E — ro C (o +� 'L W N C Q Q L C d W N " •cn N "6 C N CAA 0 0 J Q �:- O C C cn O = O O 41 4- mCU -0 N W Q -0 N U- u -0 N m O O Q 'a Z O C �I u Q t O +- O t N H Z +1 y v roco �WWW W W 4 roU +, cn +1 � a a) Q In Q C aU ro ro ro O W ,,^^ 41 ('6 cu L V 0 c L C C _ of Z in c+ a1 '(3 C Q E 0 + O ro ro +, L +-' Co c� N a O c0 '_n " N L o 0 41 co LL ++ QCL ro41 L N m H a1 L C O � � C = o W C Z T no Q Q dA U = U N O C a1 m IL L G1 Q m � i Q W U W i U O — 1— dA i N ,cu C 4- Q O III p N H a c o = -a 'a L `u cu (_� a, _u m = ro M ro mZ = t5 _ E = Q Q W C +O+ - E LU Q Q Co = Co V +�+ 0 L D ,yO O 1 • .�5ijip i� m L Q V LLL E Y Q N CO v Q U- -0 Q U T- 0 co N -p a1 W c -o c c to cn - 'X O to 4� � c c L au ro nn N v v 'N O0 Q o co -a -a O -a E c c _ 1 4, - L O N � N b4 c 4° > v •L "0 ro vp C O N c CJ L O Q Q O LL -0 M N O L Cf C c O 4. •L u C LO C6 cn L Co cu {., _r C �� CL C 4� L a- lA.� O C — O c m p +, •L U O ro O Q 1, ro 41 ro W to C •C ro N a- c Q E ;� co 8- Ef ro co M C ro co — N O co Q wLL Q cn U Q H L M V � bP U �O w .� N L1 p C N 'L cu Q � 'O N L M •� � N N .N Q I r,4 U O CO ui M 4 Q cu > O O to 4 � ro+- Ln a to cu "� a) N ro ro cJ ro b.0 C C — 71 4M a-+ ro cu f D • 41 - O N V a1 (UM M o 'CS Q a1 � 4- C I- �_ C Q O -p "a ro O O — b4 L O "CS N O _ O O i f6 CJ Z L CU L Q O c o a 3 O ro co v + -a > c au O a -O v a t6 v to a� cuC — -a L L 41 cu 4N C Q c .N F° ° °o Z Cs ,, u co p � � c L1 co Q v ro to 0 O O C O E L L V O N •� •� ro 4 N ro O W Lro N 41 4' Q cn (6 4 , L roCU C O i+ U f6 L1 Q C > in LO OC O G1 cu u > LL O c w Q co ro O d •a, .O >, V L c Q L cuC 3E cu _ o ro aU o M a- : 5 Q L F- � co p M -0 � v O bD a1 c "' L co III CU y cuL cu O E •Q cu ro u � 'ro �- i O� LW c o o um o E - tL o O a- -a1 "C cu O 6Jc1c + iri OO t ro "CS cu u ( c •t bb co C o U Y�h� a.) c.� a 3 co u -a Z u Ln -0 .c N E J v tf1 lD 1� Q � 0 N O co N L (o N N cu V cu c O Z N W O c � 4— O c �p f6 In d qA c �L cu cu c W c W W E CiA E N tw a1 - O c CO cn N O N 0 m N L U C O a-+ 0 a-+ L O 4— L O L Q O L Q L O N Q cu Q CU F I V) c O LLO No '- �I � �ii�IIIII�I O au Lu G O cu Q 5iji m O IL L V Q M O co N __yy Q O CU Q C N N O W L U •4.. >, >� i1? N O O Q O4- ro" 'n "a C p C6 r) � N 01 "O F, U p 41 cNi� Q 41 Ln Q W rl Q C ro 0) Q ca � c ai E oo � m c (,nu -a N M L r > d Ln o O N ro o O s C W a, 3 i/? Q J U i/? i/? Q J N U t6 ''' •'_' u- C +� ura N O v -o � o� ,F,' ci C N C •c ro — {. 4F 4 f6 E S-- (o Ln C6 C U U -Q N Q CD >. W +� qA v +f° 'J O I CL � GO �i j L O N L ca .0 , r LO rz) cu ro CU cu C C N 3 " 0 � bD ro C C N a, °' w Q w a a ao 3 3 C cu ro ro '� a, ° ° •4..i cu L .L••i {J {J N Ll — C roI > U a O C ( AD moo C CU 41 N N O ra N E GOo L r C E ro E -- L N h0 -0 O L to L to N O L 0) C �"� 'C O C N = 41 cn w cn N C Q c m 0 + CDC EL tlA N Q +fir N 5 N N nD to �- .� w O to cn cn 41 = ra p N u E L + cn Ln tw (UN O 'a U c-I cu Q ON Q E O _v a1 O O O ro cu to 00 LLO +� ca c'Ja OU +' 41 c�i� WN Q t O Q •� nA "CS -0 U do 41 d C u w r O O O = a1 C hA to NtLo p L C (o L N Cro t Ln O C cu roI Q - U N O "O = c a E > E (u ro •5 +� a f6 O C CL O in O C (B N to 0 VI U ra Z Ocu a1 co ro > ro j a a a1 OU a C6 — p N to J C •N CC dG .� (U -p 0O T, ro Z G N Q O GO ra 41 _J 41 N F i C O V1 m a Q cro ra F + E a1 co O C cu q a •�VIVu" a-+ .F.r O ro m ra Uj L C N r_nu a� � 'a oc v Q (U a C Y •,� °J �ii�llllll�l F — O Q E o L a, ca _ y +' a-' ro Q u c ro n �' E :c Ozra -a o G Z c n co boo L C u c o Q 5 L 3 Y� u O a o " w c ° > �- fl 1ID6 > U .� '� .� co J r4 N C7 W Iq 0 co q � m 2 � \ C m 3 3 / 0 ƒ 2 / QL & 2 q u & m e . crro kL.Li m 0 0 06 " 0 # c 3 -0 cic s / ro / 2 � LIJ ƒ � m 0 > k 0 7 c n cic 2 0 \ \ � k 0 u o E @ Q 2 $ E > CU / � m / 4E 0 6 6 0 " F- jo d 2 � - 0 m 0 n / e E Q > u + � u \ v § ? / n 2 e � ~ 0 02 7 . m \5��Jjj a) $ \ 2 >° e m \ u O y k k m m 3 3 LO C) co CN 4J 0 cu " cu -0 CL W 0 :6 0- W QL co to cu ro cu Ln U " b4 4� cu C. CU CU I I rH rH Ln CU cu E aE u )"0, qj)- qj)- qj E C,- o 0 cu Ln 0 0 cu z Ln 0 cu -0 ro o Z c Ln O Ll- 0 C CU -r3 N 0 0 ro C: +, 0 CU C Q- CU E O CN ro -0 CD -r3 O L two QE tw ro 0 0 CU 0 roLL ro ro tw ro LO Ll ro ro ro ro CU c C: S c .S c >. c ro ro cu F -0 E> u ro m N o cn o 0 cu 0 0 0 0 0 U0 Ln U Ln U W Ln U U Ln Ll O r14 r14 O r14 rj b.0 b.0 b.0 r,4 0a10 I�t 0 w b.0 r14 b.0 ro C Hill LL 0 r14 0 u 0 CU r C� cu 0 CU ro to cu 4� 0 m b.0 E cu r3 C5 'Z, ro >. cu O rH >-- Ln o 0 -0" " 0- Uj 0- 0- c Q) cu -r3 > c = 0 LO cu E o -0 E b4 CU 0 cic +1 cu ro E 41 CU t(n E cu u 0 0 tw m cu tw cic c CU C: a- w .— cu " ro ui i O H C >. N 0 0 QL 0 tw u M Ll 0 < CU 0 a ro cu -0 ro E 3: 4- — 4- z cu 0 a 0 +,LU U. 0 x ro ro a) 0 0 to cu w 0- -a r ui m 0 01 " cu In w 0 ro M C: ro E -0 CU L.. ro m = QL U ro ro E —ro 0 m 0 u +, r 0 0 U U 0 E CD m cic ui 0 0 0 a- cu 0 " ce cu 4- 00 :t 41 cu C r,4 F— z CU CU M 0 0 0 ilo < > 4� b.0 -0 (D o Ln ro -a r,� bo bo ro 0 c c >, " uj CU o cr-- to 0 2 —1 CL = cu M Ln 0 0 4� cu 0 0 0 0 ro " " u " -0 QL QL w ui a) to C: + W 0 ro (V cu z m cu = LU 0 o > 0 0 0 E cc: 7a ro > 0 -Lu -2 0 cic --_j -a U.J LL LL Ln a) 0 0 0 CU E w ro LO a- ro ro ro r_n CU (D C) co CN cu4� b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 CU ro ro -0 +, Ln Ln .4N cu Ln Ln cu cu > E u u _a 0 cu 0 ro 0 z c Z c can to Z 0 0 CU tw ro C)- ro +1 +, ro E Ln . +1 cu W tw u Q to ro ro CN Ln = -0 0 CD E C: ro E >- ro ro ro ro >-0 +1 " 0 0 a) a)U LU c E -0 +, " ro 0 40- CD +1 -0 +1 0 +1 ro ro ro tw a) -0 ro ro :3 ro c E ro tw C: E c - F v E -0 4� 4� -0 ro .0 ro (' E -20 +1 " C: Q� Ln +, E .7 0 0 0 ro 4 u 0 ro Ln 0 ro ro 0 = 0 Lo U 4- Lo U a- Lo U N r14 O ro E r14Cw LL E rl� 0- :3 rj 0 O 0 tw r14 tw LO rj co r14 0 co r14 0 u 0 — C)- co cu ro tw "W -cc E ro -i " , s ro rO E tw Ln - 3: = ro E c CL to c c 0 Ln 'n w .2 .U- - 0 LU 0 u -0 E 2 " m ro 0 tw C: = L C: +, u " ro cn ro w o E t)b < a) . C: ro W 0 M E u c — QL 4- u o +", 0 ro ro U 0 to �E co +1 c a) a) M 0 o W ;.:. r) 0 :t 0 LL m Lj- Z cu cu , 0) , cu ro �e ro +1 Q- 0 E o Q +1 ro X c Q- cu E +01 a) -0 ro E 00 — 0- c +1 - -1 .- ro cu E 0 cic cu u 0 u J cu bp 0 >-0 Q- ro " ro m c u — 0 .0 u c cu a CU ro to 0 QL 0 o " — m cu tw o W -0 (D > m E u o E c Ln C Z; C M CU Ln 0 tw a) ro +, m ro a) I cu u ro r) fC 0 0 -0 0 -0 a) ro m 0- a) L- — E Q- :; m +1 0) x E u 0 x cu 0 CU UJ 0 0 cu ro ro E 0 cu a " =.8- a) ro cu — — 4- Q- E bo E 4, a 0 ro 0 LL QL 0 -0 cu -0 ro U QL c m ro CU = . cu 0 -0 b4 r a 2 u ro :t u o o two to = m o 75 c " cu 0 u ro -0 u -0 SLI -0 E C: +Cul = C: = -- +, Z 0- c m a) +1 >. +, ro a) -0 = - ui E .2 m W 0 > +1 +1 b4 ro CU 0 cu tw E lu Q- W OC C: M c u cu z ilo cu —CAdJ m 0 0 U m w .2 -0 -0 CU Q�' +1 0 >. >. -2 - +1 C: " CU -j Ln u o ro CL +, , 0 -0 Ln LO cu +1 +1 +1 " U ro = = LU +, 0 ceu a) ro cu 0 w E m 'Z, C� tn I c 7- +1 .— o -0 0 ro ro 0 0 c +� = 7d �ii�lllll�l a' 0 +� to -0 co u m Ln U C vi In u u 'n E -S -2 c cu >- Ln +1 cu ro +, Ln a) a) ro —'— 0 >. >� ro ro m U u uj ro — o o a) E U< 4,-n -M r"o E In 0 . 8EECOU = +' E "M cc cc +5 :t 0 CL ro +, 0 0 0 �e :t -, ro ro ro 7a X 0 0 W a) M ��5ij +1 u -0 Lo LL U 5; E UJ U- (A ro LO LA co :a -13, :a Z' %6 I- C) co N v Y N CD"O to C � C to O to a1 a C C cu ro to X E O CD L `n O Ln CD rl L!•1 O u Q t/� t1� U Q a1 a1 C C qA qA N N N CD fo W fo W fo fo O +r C +r C r C fo C fo Cfl L v L O C O O >` •L O > •L U - U -0 r) co LL L rj �_ � m W r14b4 C N cu 0 cu 0 m r14 m r14 U C 41 O "CS bp C O , +, C C O N N o -0 O Ol Z ro � ; L cu L (o N Z L1J Q c to N O0 c O i a1 co O O N = u L +1 cn nA _ u G v 4O Q u d �p Q v .0 c -0 c c C7 i L L O ro > L O Z 0O ro -0 r O Z CL c "a to > u a1 C cu > o +° W E c o -0 Y v +� u ro ro UO W C N CAA G to Iu Y , O = c a J = N N C6 m _ ru y -(� cu Q cii Ln W � O C Cit Q wt Q v uOC O " v c O co rz) C Xro II o a1 c') O co Ln c W U CL v c m b.0 •41 "CS I � > fo OC > d N a-.� O o +- aW 4� LLi p vl to +, cn C L C N C C 41 41 vi ♦W�+ G1 CU +I•+ Q Q v � L 0- C L m O UJ QJ Q Q Q N 51111 y� � Q1 E S E w > -0 > N tf1 U roo " U � r) Ou -0 v Q -r3 0 e-I N co 0 co N Q W v Z L to ro cu au co 0 N C CU CU 0 cuN O mill Z 0 - O V p fa N l co N co E a a N u W oA m e m c v m V O 11�1 cn co .� cn co L r) 0) Q Q a crij r > +� a p p 3 H �a,o a It Q LL Q LL �-a Z - ro C6 > ro >; C Co s 4ui M cu _ .� W ro c . cu cu C .ro � (� 0)Nro CL -O Y tea O no n o p no n o 0 0 0 Q J = v w cn U � w cn U tLo +� a Q E, v W ui W c ri no f° c c no - _ � � � p C •L C � � 3 cn a CUN 'o cri '0 O a> >, = W cv W p W G �n LL o m � o 0 Q ` a c c '> a�v nr) v co >W v > L Q Q u ro i L N a1 -0 ro O Q a1 N V E Q O `� u N N ro v �' v o E = r ,�.., d "6 N O t O u. " L > N to c 0 0 E O cn O N Q W co Co N V ro Q roCU ', �- ZLlCU �- co O '- LJ i _ 22 Z U OU G L C c 'a ~ O O > W � calu CL Q O O -p 4- O Q O O a1 0 L > j E O ro Q = v a1 o O . u- p W c a to N c 4� 'a L v v c .� O = c O 'L Q cu L V _ Q L V i - _ Oo L O i >ro o _O �' .� J Q z a1 ClA O Q Q --- co co r'Jo E Q a1 .0 0 vi � N L1 t6 O C tw CU .a C vi L ra co W H > w c C U- w o a +� L a, - O Z N s cu s 0 co C ^ a Q N N a1 p �>, 4- v O v co 0 o U O a, a O c L v E E i c O N N c N — W oa 1— O a O i y_ -+- Z ++ p U a1 -p C o v mll O uCi fC N Q V a1 i Q 0) 41.E O G � = - Q E � += N H O y 'I ro Ln � H 'a Q LL o coo cco o CL `� CL O Q s C v vi ro s o �ii�IIIIIUI a a� a) c� c — CU /p�C a) nbn r° c �,; ro nD ro r' 61J r W cu E Z C a1 can `1 a�1 C CLw L N N 0 Y� a)1ID[� O >- CU C cu L CU CUv > CU >. J 'i m = N O � C7 W LA 0) 0 co N L '(3 W L 0 cu O c N Q v �O N ro E — Q L t�6 N O O M L W M m +- +� L p U cV O t1? `^ L O O lD "O a) vi 41 a) a � N C � to N N cu c Y -a ,� -a N m O O O Y O O tJ? ro to "O E O - - t n to } cu cu Q +O+ +fir � N N _ L "O O L r) cn CU r1 CD CD — dt O r-I C O m 41 cn cn "CS O i/? N N i/? i/? t6 cn N Ln W a1 cu a r t CN L L c \ CD c 5 C O /" txo W CJ C Cfl (o ro ro W C C C •c c O W W W W W V O W O C W L C O C C C roC ro m O a1 ?� r j a�1 O �, Q CD Q >- CD c v > O c a1 'n p >. p rJ E' +� "CS O m N O a 'O -0 N U O Z Q c) -0 u Q W c -p c fo N a1 "p > o C p t6 O C L C a rI Q Q CAD t6 O N ro Y CUW Q) cu = N CCO vi ro C CU C "a to O a1 4N c Q v v Ln cu U ro N Ln v L C > E to to O to +1 L a1 uo E cu — — Q co ro > cua) ro >- hA N 41 N b.0 C ro L C ro a O 'n toro c O C � cn O v L 1 C a1 -p N — E i C 4; C]A o 41cu C N to cn O 41 C6 C6 cp Q O 4, C]A � � +1 a O O O > cn N O C) W O a1 m C dA — O cn O U v O O f0 V V ii� C cn " L ro ti Co V O 0 cu 1 lD -0 01 F L O cuN i C W N ro O N L ++ T jilo CU O >. U.J It 0) CU lit CU = M O ; nA U C E �ii�IIIIIUI c c cu +� a ` m L LA. M O C "6 L 1A — Co O U.J y V cu V O OV S C CU Q ro C U Y C (moo C L > N a LO 4- C cu L1 m ro � •� aO+ a1 U O O O > Q ro O a 01 O L E = ro Co > L ro r a1 'a _ " V1 to O Ou O G w W U > ro Q lC 1� 06 01 C) T- oo N co co N c N 4- to m to m O C •N• C •N• C -p O -p O > p 'O 41 41 C C tLo0 x + U a1 -0 o •3 C � i C .Q i u CD uo W _IleE O L L O cu cuE cu cu V u C O W W E cn W ui d N C O p U Q1 � .c m c {- C N C ro cn N N i.+ LCDL O (o W N U N a1 O 0) cu cu O N cu CD O ao O C r-I C C � N N .O O C to CD U ro CD cu a1 a1 to c11 O H Q r14 Q N — C LL > Q O N + C a L N L C X_ O cu W h o 41 Co N E QJ ro — ro x �. Co ro N -a In 41 cn O O Co cn Y p -0 L M '~ O -� ro aJ U V1 N ro N - ` +J V cm-Iro CU >` cu Q .N N to O C]p Q cu (a aJ U ro Q � O ro — cn ro cn -a i O bA 0 O 41 cv ro ro co O cu >. cn a o 41 CU _ !•� Y U ca �.- cn ~ O +1 to a O QJ > C a' p cu - O CU >> b CU W U L C F C O O N U �O CU Z Q1 X !•� L L N •� QcuO cu (AV ca Z a fo rocu + Fro fro cuV IL E O CAD to C CU C O o °il a1 "O O cu L O C C tin 0 cu41 W CUO Qr ro cu - ? C N F dA L ro •z o Q a = C O cui 0 F J +, U 0 co O — m z CU L J W O tp OC G1C ry mo u to "O O 'O O 0 O Yta N U co a co J e-I N M O C7 W co N O O U nAro QJ c O N cu O a1 O a1 a U "O Z c U O _O CU cu v � " °- o 4 c a � roU b3 nA L O ji LO CU 0) CU W cu bA 2 Jill ru W G L N QJ N j > N N O c a1 C -0 N LL ro 0 CL u = L N = N tlA v a1 a1 co CD ro CD a1 c L N L N O a a � O O N � ro y1 C.A CU o cOo M to u N ro cu 0) QJ cn E (o b4 '(,� u L a1 •N a1 cu (o 0)C6 O ( a1 0- 0- 4- QJ N N '� c E ci 'O Q N a1 t6 p "O c N t6 °J +, c ra +, > s cJ ro co v v N L v CU c v c c no �' Y a) •N a1 L CU .N o: m a) > Op 0 v N ,N X > O O> — f6 c + L a O to Q O c? Q c +� a1 c L O U •� c CUc a ' c a� c cu 0 Ln CUCU +-% 1 co c -a " c "O 0) 4-1 0) ro 'L � ° ro raa a E c c ra CUm ro v -a a co ao (� Q L W ro ro = 4- = c fa Q ro 00 Q 01 .L +� O -p to Q a Q w a) t_n ro cuLn L 0) J N i > L O a1 c q � v `luVluu" d C G1 c > C O N C>6 ro 'a a, = a) v _ U W ro N v M CUro 0 N Z aJ W L CUL Q G ate. cu C D s °1 E N c L CL }- c ro ro np c� C7 ° tin LI Q L p +- �, ^ a1 c ro °1 ° ro 5iiij Ln m a oa O v °_� co °' m E ro v ru i = W d' N L L L E M -C O � Q N (6 L C6 u O +�JLI m e in a nA c CU c Ln C C a Q � O ++ O a1 ro > n0 to — co O z a N u L U w E CO Z e-I N N T- oo N cc CU c ro 0ma 0 E cuW Ln a1 rl i/? ui N O O to -0 to N 44 0�0 0 � 0 L N N N � a) f6 N +rLn Z 'n lu `~ lu N c c�i� -� cu 0 cu 0 cu Z c Z c to U c Q m I O O O O fro "6 ro 41 "c 41 ro N CU to to +_' to c U a1 O to OC rt Q tw Q tw O i O O O •L L cfl p ro U ro U L ro U u�lummimu Z CU c ,� ._ to to 1- to a) M r •w a) uu p a, c c c ro c = c c a c c �WWW Z = O (n W (n W 0- W (n W W a- W W +' O J O N N N tw W CD CD ON •C C G CL ui ui CO ui O r14 O 6L 'a ui � O C a nA a1 � c '6 c to v c c N c ro � > -r3 c o cu L W a� a "a o Q v — C� O N O ICI O CLlc N a1 WLn ro ro N cu cu 77 _ c p cu �' �, a) c' N Z E a Ln �WWW O r_n cu +- W c 22 Q U C c a1 U +r O Ln w LW N v nA F. O to a: Q v W N }cu Lu 'O r U W +• Z v o o J v O W Lncu a1 uj U CJ Fr cic Q U cn C V ^ L +G1+ G cu ro co Ln aC) a V O V Z cu E o a) ma a) O 3 v W i Q v a1 m -Z t6 ro µ— 4- a1 O v u *' cu +� U) III O W a v a1 d bA � " O W E a1 Q � � •T O U Ln 6L �. U E fC ro v N p ... W � .ti' QJ C M Co V "6 ro dA � dJ 61J � N to y 'n ro � ` dJ C W O d � _ W dJ ro L W Q1 dyA a1 w W c�i� i�� 5iji y/% — U G1 tL6 41 a1 N G1 U N G ro ;° J N C O C W O Q z W cn W cu CJ W Ln J � � c� a M 0o N v C c � � 41 .0 +' = 3 } +� E c ro +, v r) ° qA O u a1 cn np CO U 0) L ro CO ro °J a ro L 'V? L cu m N N Nro .. cu U O V rO N Lp N N N c O N O S 3 C Z c O LL LL � oOC � tLo N + w N u ~ Q •L � ro E O a1 = Z ro ro _^ U 41 4' 41 c CU C •� C O H U c c = O ro O co 0 0 rt nA �- Q "a two Wwtwo O 0)ul a O •L L L C L •�•, L L L (n 4- CI.O CU CU ro Ln i C6 O c c i c 0j c ca 41 fW6 a) 41 � Q 6 L O L � ,� U +� L N N L O Vl = L ro cu ro O >. L >- (o L O C CC •�'•� Co C L O 41 Co cu L ro O �p 3 L G Q L H U � Q � H d U C a tLo ro Ln nn o a� O E c N N W tw E O O •� •L O •� N N O c O N c 41 W N -p CAD W Q = UA UO a1 Ln U- o CO Ui o COQ w _ C N U L1 W O u ro b4 C v = 0) O Lf1 O U 4� LA in Q N L ro cu ro 'a t +, O N U Q f— fo VI WO fro U Q C cu 0 •N -0 C +1 u >- to O ro C • U L x L O U N N L � CU L O cu '— CULn — •L VI N •0 `� ,0 O N U U cu U � cu d L Y N N Co Lb4 > O cn t co = c 0 cuui +, +, N 4- -0 cu N 41 >. 41 cn _ +. }u ro U +, 2i 41 cJ 41 C to 0 CU 0 W L N cu 0 •L 41 •• (o (o ro U O N 00 41 CL 41 to y 4' 01 41 cn U C co M E a1 a1 C c a1 c Q a a' a 41 ,� tLo Co Co (a c d Nf (6 ra N > L O -O C in o = CU co -p U c 0 p 7 U O co ++ N II 3 cu0O tL6 0 C ro N � o AI CAN Q b. v wO O w L U H C t c f° p J A ro i a1 cu 'w uo =) N L ++ E N O LJJ O v U ate••' •vN_i '^ QUJ N L O V CAA {� 5jaPa1 'F'� to vU to .F .Out y��1 Z > v N O t V 4- O C O C U "CS > > bA cu o fa W ,-Q "6 a1 ro LA %6 n 06 d oo N lD Q N vro � N � C6 LL -0N N roO i E cu N +, "6 = ro p "CS to X C N ro UO L C cn W W ro cu Q0 cu = = Ln O Q E N Z C Q E N N Q C N t6 `n O LL O C a1 nA *' C t6 Co V E ,C_ LL F, 0) .N N t ro C 41 41 tw E c CD ro p Q _ tw 0 41 c N O c J ro i L O DLO ro O 0 co C +- (D O 0 00 ro 4— ro U ro ro w ro a v 'E v v C w v ro E C C6 L C a a V i c�i� 41 ro 0ro "6 M to cn V N O -0 cn � Q cn W V) fro 0 U m W cn U U CO C Ll O r,4 _ O_ N O L W LL p N a1 U E L N _ C a + E N O O I Ww Q Z, N cn N C a1 X Q O a O co a1 O N a L.0 N +cu O L1 a1 a1 d, C ro "a N _ N mc 'I ro +, 5 C -� a, E to O cn L O C > 41 a 41 O 41 C N ro 41 cn fN6 E V V (D -p N t Q O iii .0 O N t�6 Ol U Ol W a; y -O N nA `� E to to if cn O O — ro H L O a QV N L •I-•i O O O O E �O Q L V Wo C u c y Ln ro .� O — nA cu O a1 Z to N ro cu ro •V N V L Lcu ice+ -6 V i cn �• L1 cu L 4) ro V ++1, {' U C CU C N 41 Ln cn W + C6 O N W U ro L V O � cu cn > Q Z dA N C I- � L1 •C O .0 •� OQ O Oro ro 0 mal a 0 0 ro N E ° L °C° rQo n co a ro ° aCL co Q •O N CA / Y cn O E ro *' " v O O N 4' L o U U N CU (o L O O II c v v o v Q ° � Q a qp c� iri � cn to +1 O N -O O y Q 'a a1 •C j in 0 O "a N v C a1 a1 7 III N p N L 4� "a �' O C 'n O Ln ro a O to m C �ii�lllll�� Z v ca o +, O Q Q v 4. +� � C N +� 6 w J 3 = C L U ++ f6 +, i cn cn N w , -p fC C cu U 3 a •O N N c (D � Q U .� " m p U W vI �o O ma L CAD 5iji O -w +- E 41 41 L OC 7 i O Q V C y/% cicO y = C 7 2 Q 0- Q 00 Lo O a-.� N v tCCQ �' �' t6 cn W rH m Q 41 LO T- oo CN LD 0 E C -0 ro 4� 0 4- 3 CU ro 4� -0 b4 b4 ro C: 0 W W w o C: E- C: - —M ;_-- "0 uo cu c cu • 0 -0 CL ro ro Ln Ln c 7@ cu CU ro cu ro Ln CU b4 E " Ln Ln o CL Ln CU CU o 0- 0 4� CU u u CL Cr U 41 Cr 0 M Ln u 0 cu 0 cu cn 0 cu cu 0 0 c Z CL ro Z C:z z cu cu cu bp ro 0 W o co cu ro cu LO CN 0 0 4� U CD M M 4� M-0 ro C: ro ro = c ro Ln 4� rt c ro 4� Ln ro co CL E ro ro ro 0 4� 0 ro bp .c W cu ro ro a) Lu 0 LO C: cu cu C: ro Ln = ro • 41 Co 4- M 0 tw cn • ro o 0 a) = cu 0 o o -i CO a LU LO u LU LL u ro > ro LL ro r,4 M r,4 r,4 CD 0 4� r14 M cu cu r,4 r14 cu M CU M c 0 .2 C: E ui r14 4� E CU 4� - cu 0 C: r14 0 E r,4 o 4� M 4� E rj tw c u L= C 0 C 0M L=o 0 0M 4� 0 cu cu -0 0 -0 r 0 CU ro >- LO 4� 4� 4� 11 c 4 C: CL c ro C: U 0 C W . " W cu cu C CU a) E '- = E > w E w 0 w to +, — E E w E 0- roL ro E a) +1 E Coro 0 L- c 7a 0 u ro 0- M — a) Ln u a) cu a) +, > X '-Z 0 > LU — 0 cr 4 L- to -0 cu - 2�1 +, a) c cu >. E cu D w 0 C: 0 E c -0 C: c u C: vi -0 > cu ro cu ro —'— o bA 1. 0 b4 -0 0 - 0) ro Co 0 M M Co 0 0 7a 'C W .0 Ln CU 0 cu Ln a) 0 >- to M 5, cu E 7a C: E a) 0 -0 0 x 4- w 0 0 w CL r 0 to C M a) D - +1 0 7FV) 0 = :3 bD 0 u 41 u E m2 -,.z j6 0 ro W " by L 0 m 'n u ro CL 0 W 0 C: 4- Ln .- ro CL b4 -0 CL ro ro m E ro M E CC +, If w M2 a) Ln C —.: (D 0 0 L LU M ro E Co CJ cu r)W0 0 ro E 7Eb > U LU E 0 ro _j +1 n .? E E by cu " ro cu -a tw m M c cu cr CU ro ro C: ilo ro 0 cu cu u cu M T 0 E uj C: 2 M ro o It 0 -- ro cu c 12 ro o 0 ro gi 12 0 m .0 M 0 0) m Ln cu cu 0- cu cu u w >- ro E LU M 0 E CL bm E E ro E 0 rco: 0 -0 cu L- 0 ro M 0) Q- a E -0 0) 0 LL c cu L- - — 0) 3: > 0 cu -0 cu > r ro cu 41 cu w 4� > > u > ro ro cu ro -0 75 LU D 0 UJ >- Q- 5; w m 0 In = -C 4- ?: a) o E cit UJ :t E CC CC to 11 to 0 bz -i U cf LA %6 r� 06 C1 cp oo CN CL W 0 0 Y 0CU o C) 4J 0 0 W > cu ui a- cr 4� 7@ cu W tNA CU Fr c b4 CU Q- -ab4 a bp •E >. CU co E c 0 ro u 2nA 0 CU Z C: Ln .cu CN CD 0 cu ro CD ro 0 +1 o LL 0 Lo U rI4 rI4 ro rI4 rI4 b.0 rI4 b.0 uo a) cu c CD r'4 0 r'4 0 E E 0 CD b'O = b.0 E E r,4 b.0 Z) r'4 C: to C :3 :3 CD C 0 LL 0 V) Ln r'4 0 00 0 111 4� cu 0 ro ro ro r E 0 3: 72 E QL C: >. C: cu '�!� - +1 C: ro 0 0 +1 u to u CV "CS 0 C� zI W ro 0 E o CU cu ro ro 0 u cu E 0 0 41 CA CU 0 Lm 0 u > ro CL L- I- +' 4- x 0 0 W a) 0- :3 cu C: E Ln 0 LI ro 0'n +1 b4 ro 0 cu C:ro LU Ln u CU ro cu cu m Ln 0 cu 147 0 a) ro 0 ro M E E M 0 LI m cu cu Q- r LI ro 0 CU u E .�= r cu .. = c > E to Ln 0 = ro ro +1 m 4- -0 a) cu E cu C) ma :t CA 0 CU CU r W 0 w —ro U b4 :t 0 m " +- ro W 0 3 m cr ma I- w - c UO 'm +' +' 0 C: o u ui r ro m 4 0 w W oN co to ( (� F— ilo -r3 ma 3: CU c ro C ro uj 0 ro u Ln CU 4� :!f • w M cu ui 4� Ln ro 4� o m u —ro 0 cu 0 Lm .— 4� 0 a- 4' c1c QL 0 3: "i M cu x .0 -Z' Z cu 0 0 C c Ln �;7 U CU 0 = CU CL j2 = a) cu 0 0 0 w o c M Z LLJ +' C +' W ma W CU 0 c1c 0 2 .2 to Co CU . mo Co ro Cf cn 0 i uo ui > CU -W +' CU C: m >— ro :t C: z two a) ro Ew &, M -a " = C- 0 w E�5iiij CU :5 OL -0 ro c m w cu > a) C:0 - = -0 -0 -j (A tw ui a) Q m Z E SOL 0 CL � _ oo q 6 ro £ cu ? & o \ \ 2 0 CU u cu 3 2 c u m F f CD >- a- / >- a % _ � % \ / � % w % % / � 7 \ / � k 2 e k 2 # o \ / # o v) U R v) U / 3 k c q m 2 { m q m \ ro 2 � -1 0 � bb � U- o e e m & o U- o % 0 7 E W 2 0 § ƒ3 , E \ ' 3 g o \ » 2 § / : — o o ƒ a u - " � C) k \ f 2 / ƒ » Ln Q C- " 3 o v / j a) k 2 / •- 2 ® E 0 V) 7 v o e 2 n / Lam) E d $ 2 2 2 2 u / Q n / (A a- o ilo0 � 2 cu % m k m ƒ o � k 2 A 0 o m \ \ / + � ro \ 2 E § 0011 � 9 4- CU $ w / \ U » c R ¢ ■ n m 2 : 7 2 / ro E m m k 2 (%« w 2 ln \ k 2 lU o m 3 / U>i E D / � � � co T- oo N vro v L (3) 4� L L ro L 4� 4� cu ro C)7 — O a1 nA C a co Q r° "p cux C 41 nn c °1 O E c co O — +- to C L 4. N C O Q +O+ cuO qA O O O cuO Z i/? Z Q O N CD iA 0 �1 41 _ � � C O ui C r f6 1 N 4� — O LL c Q ' E m to C vi O LL U "a LU 1 aj o L 4. E L > "6 N O = ro to av, U U cn U Q H a v N W c N W c v W w -p CDc O c c c c a N C N C N O O i,I f O = W W — W ClA N ClA L ClA ui O CO ro c CU ui O CO to r,4 O U O O � M CJ C O LW .O O � a cu � cu C cn N E ' a1 L co L O co co O nz cu ro O c N Ui C Q L L N N •C Q 41 41 O — cu I ) N 41 a1 > -a +� E Y co c`Jo U a1 cn O c N E O v 0 nA np O — O C cuC L C N +••� C'6ro cncu a) cNi> > 41 CUCU ro LO c ro ro v cu ro C to C ro 4. `, C O O to L to E v 0 O � vi O V C N O vi CU 41 F, v W 4� N C O 41 'cn 41 > N t6 cu C u cn "CS } to + "O + to N Z Ql ro C cu N Q i C6 C6 cn C Q C i+ QL cu 4j O 0- cuC CUv C N CUro LL N N cu _ Q x '� ro cici-i O C Q L to fC CU ro cu — a1 O CU ro U- v fo to O 41 CJ 41 C C6 to >, > L Q- L Q QJ A L C U C Z- O v a1 co L O �, C d Q C 41 N— U Q � L Q q a1 'Vuu"' Z C O C d C p _A v�i ro ate, L W >1 N FM = O = O :E cu Q C W � � •� cu d Wu *' > CO v co cun0 CU *' co +� �- -� 61J W N C to aTi Q 3 41 5 O Ln L1 m C O cn a 0- -a a v vcu cu > c� Y5im,!fir Q m . �' Q � V 41 C et E v " E ca v c O n L a �n u ' D v °1 ° oc ro a o ro v o 42, O � C7 a ri c i ro �t oo CN CU cu cu E to C C 0 to cu = Ln CU CL C cu r) b.0 b.0 ro O cu cu 0 Lr) c� cr ro -0 ro qj-)- O cu cu CU U 0 L CL CL E E >. 7a cu cu ro C 0- 0 u 0 u QL 0 0 = Q) Q) > u u u Z c: Z c: tw Co ro 0 Q) 2 ro Z! _j -C Q) to— u cu tw CN ro d C> Q) CU O Q) 4j cu Q) ro ro +, +, 0 tw C 0 U +, 0 ro ru u > roLn2 u>. E ro cu > E ro CU CU ro cu u u 2 CU cu ro 0 CU ro 4� 4� Ln 0 cu LIO a- LL L.Li u aJ ro 0 r14 LL b4 -S-- ro r14 r14 C C r14 r14 r14 0 r14 r14 b.0 0 r14 C r,4 r14 r14 r,4 0 W r,4 .c: O CU 0 (A 0 CD r) QL ro 0. CL rlj r14 r,4 CO r,4 V) LL ry) cic ui 4� 76 0 ro L41 cu to > z cu cu cu cic 0 0 cu ro4� to cuvi to cu ro =cu =cu 0 in cu roG a, Ln CL = t� W cu cu -0:3 E ro 0 CU ru 0 0 o u -j In .— r > o-C 0 ruL L to cu 4� 4� ro QL ro ro cu QL • CU-0 Ln cu CU cu W C g- U > > -C Co ro ro -z, 4� 4� — cu 0 C -7n ro to tn 0 ro b.0 Ln ro — CU u C cu cu b.0 Q) +, CJ +'F z 0 - _C ro •:t CU V) 0 ro 0 W " CU -C D +cul E 0 ro 0 U -c 0 cu ro +, 0 CU ro -C 0 c: m >- a- ?: 4� CL m cu ro .N ro u 4� CU 4� CA — 0 cu CU C a- to + 0 • 0 m — to cu M M, C 4� -C cu -0 -0 -C 4� -C 41 ro C ro W u T CL u c)- Co > =M +1 a) +, tn CU 0 cu o cu o tn c: CCL — cu ro -0 ro LLJ m ro cu cu two cuoc a) +1 0 Z +1 -to ,;� ro ro cu V) w cu > F- ilo < CL ro cu — QL m tn 0 to cu ro E u CO 0 bD z 0 a) Ln u Ln .7, -E 3: .S to L- ro "0 cu 0) cu cu >- 5; 4L to� 0 " E cu 4E CCU cu r 0 LU (A 0- W W C W ro C �$e a) -0 — 1- 0) 4 uo D CU ZA cu ro ro E "nn CU -Lu o w tid 0 Ln C >� co -S-- m +1 u Z3 a lu Q- E 0 m L- E W a) 0 Ln u ro a. U m u L.. m E U = ro 0 0 tle -j no ro ro u w 0 N co N L 0 (V m ro � U mm b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 cn N cn 'O ro "O ro "O ro "O ro O ro O to L � N N N N Q� � � (o cu N N N N N •V N to •� LJ cu � LJ LJ cu cu cu � LJ L L to O O U 4 Z c Z C Z c Z C W Q N a1 b3 4- 4� 4 N � a+ O C L L V O O a L —� U O co co o co r C]A cu d Co L Co c O v S v "a L — N c c co c (o L >` L >` L ( O 0�0 a U Q U Q cn U C.A N •L C N O N O (n L O CAD r14C: C � L c cu L C: . _ E cu _ O C N C +�- N O +- = N 0 •L W W N •ClA N uo E cn O m r14 m r14 O N W O O N y p cn L +, to +' > cu > m CU cu aL+ W w N >' cuL Y CU cu� C •O _ N V ro V +, cu Z O N a1 C C +' C O cu ro :t "O cn N a1 +� V E0 cn fo i cn Q C6 vi M a1 a1 cu -p cn O Q cn Q O CU Q = Co CJ L "6 L cu _ _ to _ LJ L � � CAA 'L � (V � (V (V • v N ro a1 v > C m N N a1 -0 -O C •L O L ro •� to •�•, m L � L to = Q = — O O — v is cn ro a1 -0 cu cu C�6 ro L G1 ClA N > Q O L a+ L a1 W L _ O ro C a1 L O = 0 U t6 � ro u y N N Lu L a1 co CO cu N Q co L1 E u � ro U -a C N a1 c c U ° + C +1 = coro v N -a o -a c a) a ro U. > `- M -0 c y ro ro C , LU 0 ro d m c O co O ro a1 L N O Ln L i W 0- b4 •a1 +� p +- •a1 H M -0 CU •ClA d "('3 C L fo i-� CU N C ro 4- O `n .N cu to C 0- ro cu /= p :t O = +, cn = C6 C 0 4 U CU cu ro ro _ilo o v H L G1 ~ a1 f6 ++ CU cu .a N U Q O L C a1 t6 C v F -� = L oUj lit 0 -a a v -o ii Q N CU +1 L OL O +' H > j W cn �II�IIIII�I fC a1 +� }' +� c o p O ^ m Q C O +> L C � to = CL6 *' p a1 O +- cC M L U O "� i U a) L c O Q C � +-� Q a) a? 3 U c _ CaA Q 'N +, a1 a) O to = a) +r = d CO co Q O L co °; c a1 -p > s � L L v rI ( 41 vi co c y > Q = L > O YI J�t / •L = (V (V '� O (V ro Q L N NO F fC C6 +., i� G1 C O , C M = 7u E O O N � N •C J 4— Co (J L C cn W L cn -0 U T— N co N 06 00 Q 7 c W Q i rq "a to N a m C cn u C ~ N W " c n u Q a <J U U Z c a ' v v V s c J dA m +- O SdA O U Y O i O O L r Z fn Q 0 CZ1 ami s = 0 ro _ a = a m Z °1 v m u u (:2 — — N O z J tyC i to -I to -IC: a l N rp +1 u N u N CU ! W N W N •L N — +, O C N C N CO G Ln >. O >. O 0- 0 to O O m N m N cn N W O C7 N N ICI = a to (o "O •CJ C W HCU cu c c ro O W `' L b4 d O M OC v o c c c n `'. _ _ cu s �IW°W°W u. cuo c 0 = o = W W +' E co O a1 41 a1 CU +, O y cu V (1 a) E L W E s O o cu c + Z a, a � � n J �Oj nA p U L co +T+ O Z 0O L 41 O O N W o., a — aU cCO 0 +' + i > C cu ro41 O c ro v 0 H a=i v E c c c v Q o O Y O -0W 4- F v } Q n ro o Q L �a o a�i a _ ' o� Om O c rij 1C , Q � OO x t �iIV 'a a1 dW O L .`�. (u 'L U .Q O lufa O L1 E .O cu Qj a1 in W 'L L Q cu Zi..i CU u E dc O W+ � V L V - Vc 01 +L Q = v cu O �1 = C 0- N 1cu + +1 cu ro Q N IU Oro O C M w O p O C cn Ud Loco 0 ' �5iji C L G1 — — JN v C6 uF m CN CN co CN -0 0 cu W -0 W W W MIS a ro 4� u ro -0 ro -0 ro to ul C ul cu CU cu cu cu 0 CU 0 0 cu 0 cu 0 cu z C z c LL Z c Z c 4, c 4, ro ro 0 4� � 4 CU a) 0 ro w 3: E CN LO E CD 0 ro W cu cu W cu 4— 0- 0 — a) (D ro ro 0 0 E ro ro CI- U w ro 0 Ln W ro cu CU Ln c -0 0- -0 -0 w ro -0 ro 0 0 0 to u U u W W W Ll c Ll • W c cu CU w c — z c E ZZZ 1 0 Q- r14 rH CL rj ro ro w -z: rj bb ul rj E r,4 LO rj LL rj CU 0- 0 C: >- 0 a) -1 0 >- 0 >- 0 CO Ln r,4 0 CO r,4 CO Ln r,4 co r14 03 r14 a) C: -0 cu -0 >0 r14 E 21 cu CU 0 cu >-= 0 Q- c rn cu a) W 0 . E 0c Q- E ro Q- +, C: to .— W z cu E LO = Ln cu Ln 0 ro E 0 :3 o a) :3 " Ln cr cu CU a- cu T -�5 cu >- ro u 2 +, ro- W w 0 Ln r 0 o� E C: c " ufCCC 0 cu LU a- >- 0 E W CU ro 6 E +r'o "0 W 2 CL cu E " cu E E CL +1 ZZZ Ln " CU W cu cn ro CU ro 0 w o ro 0 c C: 0 0 0 0 0 ro Co CU o LU cu cu to a- cu >0 a L41 Z; cu >- cu cu cu lw 0 -0 C: ro 0 Q- cu > ro u cu 4� 0 C: 4� ro 4� 4� 4� ro cu a) -C cu L- +, -�e (p , 6- CU cu Ln M 0 0 ro ro u E ro u E u +1 LO 0 E m Ln a) -*- = -a cu no Ln U cu -0 w E ro 0 F u cu cu ro Lj- 0 ilo CU bD 0) 0 X b4 r UJ C:r_n cu r- ui 1� r 0 CO m a) a) E �12 U� ,L—n L- -r3 0 0 CU a cu CU U o 7A -T 0) -0 (A ro 4� .2 3: c > CU -Z, ro E 0 Ll W +1 0 CA I u IQ m CU ro -*- 0 CU W ro a -0 cu (1) .— C: CU LLJ CU :a w uj0 00 4-# 'n Q- ro— .— ro (V Ln E c = E(V .— b4 0) 0 CL CU 0 E E Ll 0 Ln ro 0 4= ro 0 C: 0 " = -Z u a) uo U ro X u ro m m Ln m CN co CN -0 ro M cu cu cu 0 E 'co u F- 0 cu CU E E W 0 cu 0 2- 4- ro 4- cr W 0 W b4 cu cu W -0 ro C: r,4 0 to cu UO ro CU CU CU cu cu C> ro ro E CU CO u —0 0 0 ro > 0 +1 cu 0 >. Coa) ro , Lo m U ro r4 'E E E Lo E: -a ro 0 trwo E ro ro E 0 Li 0 " 0 CU 0 cu 0 u 0 u co u a- u W c r,4 w r,4 = W '7— r,4 CD ro CU CL 0 co r,4 LL V) r,4 cu CU bp cu Lr) 0 to c ry) 4� Fj cu -0 -0 cu 0Ln -0 ro > > ro 0 cu cu cu C: QL " ro ro cu Qj ro -0 a..i L1 CL L to 0 Ln -LU -0 ro w m -0 cu -0 0 +, u cu W m ro " C: CCU 0 M cu Q) cu ro O > 0 E to " C: o ro 0 tw .0 0- Ll > 0 E ro — c: cu " O cu ro Ln 5 E to .�:! -7n ro C: 0 cu Q) " 0 N O nA 41 0 r_n 0 tw m c 0 0 ro -i6 'n C: CL ro ro — c E 0 a) N to W L 10 o > o- -r3 z CL a- Ln ro -0 0 cu CU C: cu — ro - CU -000 to ro to u z cu a) CU CU , o -i E D_ — Ln C: ro (1) txo Ln 0 -S-- Ln QL 4� 4- cu 2O 75 +' 41 " F- ilo ro Ln cu m cu L41 W W -0 a- :t Ln +1 C: ro CU w = r"o E fa F— Ll 0 C: a 75 Ll —0 CL M " cu 0 a- rij Ln -C U -2 z > +, z CL ti lu cu D CU -0 CU > cu L- cu w to .2 LU w cu 0 ��e +1 C: m (U b4 CL CU to 0 C: .— cur Y W C: ro CU Ln ro CL r6 ro u C: > Ln cu m Ln CU E cu cu c ro 0 ro 0 u E E S he b"z E 0 u at CO 0 dq N co N cu � X ro 3 O � co 'p 1— u 0 r) Q1 np cn '— m z � ro c E v LL o c 0 N V QJ u N u CD CU� p pC C1• Q 4- O O = o w — — 00 C C C C C fro fro r ro ro M L L L d d N d 41 d O O 0" 41 U h, U C U c L C _ _ = W = a W OHill I c � Qj N CDa N U b.0 = U COI Q QJ L v1 Co M l0 41 ro M 4 C6 i L O N vi to c� ice, Y L1 cucu o a1 coo U N +, O O cu u Q1 O a. Q CU L ro ro to C O t6 -0 41 ro L1 C N ~ N C 41 U N_ cu +,, O L b4 LO a co N x L o 0 C7 ro +�, f+-0 -O r > N v L a N N O W W O N o L1 0 OL1 a1 a) J +, cu OV N L a1 0 '~ L to 41 2 to N N �"� N L : cu E cu ro E F•I L Co cu —C OU Co "6 41 cu C cn N L C Q C a., ,ro O a v N v ro o ro CU ro Z 41 q cu m W 1n tU6 N 40 Y to "O w "O W "CS L C L ro O 41 N j uic cu a- C (n p IA fC cu H C "aLL �ii�lllll�� W U M a) *' > '�' CU y, IIIIp L L OC (p C r` i O 0 N L ��j V N ro aa c a ro "-n ujLn v 3 N cu m a, C 'L E a, _ 0 L I, G_ N 01 i v ate+ �ro,, O i1 Y 41 5ijm � z 1— c� N Ln u G co CO N o d cf' a J e-I N M cf LA %6 Q � LO N co N W LL o J Q N 00 u O Z C C ra Q m O 4' rO ^ W O E +9 tw + j J _ O L C C MO O cuCD CD Vf Ln L CDQ v CDC 0 O co O dt a1 lD O C) f° W Q U > Z v o rn W Ln Ln a) G a N *' GC o s au uN CD H a,o Q Oui ' CU N L L O = Z L41— f 'O 'O Co O Co O O ' v rn W a� (—Aa f ° i W O O O CL > r s u Oc1c ru °o °o tip ui Q = Z p U U ° o o v OC O Q a c N � v �. Z O N a, 75 ° ago i W a1 U- � C -p O 3 m in >. C p O Q uJ s cu N N O �WWW Q Q 0. a 04 rj a1 N +� rq ICI 'a Z N cA N Q ON — > c v — Q Q O ON U- Ora ICI H uJ CU O be CU W •� Q � M CL m s gyro uJ O 3 O Z i CU N d 0 Q N o N O � o = u LL b4 c v LL C U v U c a o o �WWW E uJ ' co 6L Qr O 0 to O N a c L O O � u L v n76 NJ Z •� -O v a, E s = c IleI co ro Q + O CL + cn ui a (U4� -a v O Q a 3 Y - "O -C v Q N C Q +O U a a Z E uJ � OC u cOo a co Q Qr N `6 C — N U (9 a1 N N N NJ v Q yro a Ln U NJ qp vi d a A v o uu � F N a � y � ra 0 y 7 ' > H ui I- c N H c m �Blllll�lllui�� a a, ° °' .- `° LU J Co O Ln E \ a ` 5 y N te (U V U L U O UO NOW v v O L fo OiD Ln >N. W a i > a Q O Z c7 Q a (D N co N `•} O co L m Oui t0 O cu v O v N cu 1 >, W W C -0 ro -0 fL6 ON u L nj C 41 41 N C 41 -0 ro N ro � cn -0 cn -0 N \ cu ro 41 ro 41 "T d i v O a1 d' >- CO Ln co a1 CO a1 i/? i/? W Z C V). LL i/? -0 N N t,A t,A t,A C C C UU ro ro ro 0 H a N a a 0 rt co O M p ro O b3 L ~ O f6 O ,� O O -O +- t6 -p +- O +' -O �- +- CD ro bz •L •tn O CO •L •L •L ro O ro L fo CC) c cu Ln c c cu E cuE cuv v E v O 'nA E O bz L nA -0 nA v, o o 'tw H O C o c O O U c ro c = c = 0 O c U O G U d W U U H w a w a w N U U w U M r-j M t,A CDM N M M C L C C O 41 M O O N E M N N N O -I C O O O N Ln O N N N W M "CS C a1 u a1 N a1 "O a1 C O QJ QJ C Co 'F'� �_ L C 41 +1 -0 N L > O t0 +� O ZI � to V �O Q fa 41 cu O 4' u i 2 0o ro C � OOA U E "CS 0 M to 'to d N C -0 ro vi d V M +, Y Q v t6 Q ro y OU C d u _v cu OL +� Q O '(3 O (O G1 (6 L U C Co U "O O W CJ •� 41 = � C'6 N 41 E E O G1 cn O Q M G1 +� co 0 'n +1 N t,A C) W C ` I a1 a1 Y Q ON � m O f° ro N cro cu a1 ro t C Q a ro N — L W CU C 41 L = M \ = i O a1 — N t6 a1 ' W V Ln c � 41 Y c nA L ca 41 V "CS M ro f6 -0 L — N C G1 O > +' C to Nro N +� 41 N i t O N ro L1 C — N Y W L1 Y G1 •� j a Q C i V N 41 ro +- to = O d a' C6 41ro fu ro hA c -p O .. O a1 '� N cu = C > 0) y 'a ro Y "CS d } l]p U j m "6 C U N C C O C u F- ilo F coo u OC W > of C C W N ++ U a_ ro roCA ro fC "CS i Ln — O 41 Q W " i U >. U QJ y II O N O Q � v C v 7 L = C co �, C V O a- �II���I 3 � t6 C C — O � 4= d N nA vi C m e E Y N O `1 -0 V � O tLo B I 1 O +, CL L N 41 41 O w L Co M Ln 'L v1 tlp l]p ca cu ro Q L N -o -a c (v ro •Q w _o O w o ,� .a to ) 5iji m (O > LQ • 'aQ y/%1 C7 CJ W ro > Q .� _ ° ro Ln ° Q N ro cu d F U ro ro ~ ro d Ln lD ri o6 of I- q co q « \ U- E \ w 6 2 U- Q e @ \ ® ° ± Ec � � ror ' � $ > \ o � { / ® 3 \ / o / ? a E e ƒ 7 � / / 6 0) k rH ƒ ro § % / 2 a) H H / CU � \ » / / ro 0 \ $ § w 2 \ o w ƒ a f 7 c a = / / / 3 E E � c ± u u / ro a- u ? � rj m CD ƒ { q CD 0 7 E -0 = % ' Lo LO / 2 § / / e m 2 0 2 \ $ 2 n » / » cu 2 3 ® / / \ n # n ° ® o u a) Lo r / E _ F o - S � a) # 2 / $ u \ o E _ / ® » % # a g / ® n _ > / t 2 2 cu ƒ / n 6 0 \ 2 ƒ \ \ / % § \ ° n n _� $ 2 0 t : $ 7 6 � » n 6 = n E \ x 2 \ � § \ / 0 � � e m 7 u e o G $ a � U § § � O £ n -0. lu $ } . ° � CL � \ 3 ? E E § � o LU S / o U E ? r \ �\ k tw CU � 10 ƒ / ro («« R 5 O 0 7, $ 6 Q & w w w co N Co N H r) Oa ,.,_ c ro o O L co 4 O ro c � +- Op *' QLLL ro ro t6 O V N toLr) cn QJ 44f Q r-I r-I i Q d � co N to co � V)- ON ro i/? i/? Q Ll O a ~ H H Ln v v It ~ o c 1 0 O O O 4- +� O L1 ro L L L np r) 8 r) r) r) c 00 c c c c c >- 3 ro ro O U roo roo roo v � u U O a 41 O N � U � a M 41 N N N O O E c Q1 E rj N N N O Q1 O to to L N (n m N LL LL O a �- 0 f�6 _O f�6 � cu cu � Q +- ro N O (o t O "a CU (o L ro cn Q Y p c c0J Q cu O a1 Q m O O to O vi .> O Y Q) O L cc .. L L �. .c cu ro Q L cu CU N L Q (o cu Y L L +1 Coo L �J L 4O Q) Q1 cu +� Q1 O L L c QJ ZO _ to L -� G ro � x bA i 0 c 0 N T +, - v c c o � -c v O v L •� L i� c L (o cu (o m Q �i to O Q1 b4 ro(o N O E cu ro O Y c V O N U c L Q1 ro L CAD c Co cu O Q ,Y p C6 O CD EN Q1 cu CU = �, C6 (6 Lcu CU N L V N c pli jjj M > cu Q) Q) Ll Y O } to O L "' I v c0 v > G cu F ro 4-O Q1 Q -0 Q1 cu = N Q1 N 0 ++ Lo cu N .N (U i .b4 V C'6 C6 N c H Q a 5 CDo .Q a '> L o E i; cic 4 a) CDV L C'o L fro ro U c O °j U O v ro > � iri i Q1 Q1 O CU 41 CA W V CO z i O 'FJ in L b4 c O "O ++ +' CO41 in CL -a O �, Q - �ii�lllll�� W a 3 c cu C6 — — �- W > � M fa ca �- +� vi c no v CO � O c� ,o (1 m O c co a1 ._ c 4, 4, O Y +, w ro cica .. O O co Q1 -a +, L a1 — co CL N ul E N Q -p L nn z' Q1 v� N ,, .. L v C N cco OQ E > W o m OQ 3 O c=—a ,L — `ti — +, O u cu c — 0 O 5iji a O 2 .'� u w J � Q Fu e-I N M 14 LA O � 0) N co N �.i Q H O 0 c Q O 6 w Q X L ro "6 t6 E Ln O N O a1 U w tJ? Z c N O rt' �r W 4- c tw nA O O c co ro a1 ro bz w i U c U to w a c O a1 � nA a1 N N W ro N c -0 to "O N O roc CD 41 N pro L cn O O � L1 N -IOULL ON au c O W 4; ro 41 N O `" W _O to L ro L- c CU ro O � tiA ro ro W uo N cro ro L E O v Q E v Ou U a1 co L1 _ W OL u Q W L U a to v O O c LO 'X �' > v `ti N a1 :' to t�: v O ? L p v c p O — cu +- a1 co L - c Q p -1 Q (A U y N U O > N L Z U = p — 40 W O ro Q i O coo c 0 N c ui p a1 qA a1 a1 +� co p a Q "a CL .0C cro b.0 p Uj 41 Q roL > L C Co y- II II�I Z a Q O (D v s O 0 +' °' O C O v m cu A L cic oc O 4- d i X p m Q L Y�)IDE � a uJ c7 d Q Q M Q J e-I N M Q Y a 0 M CIO L cucu _O 4� ro L c co CU O _� o 0 0 o ° o = o Ln co 00 H ro cu o ri o -0 � CU 0 o ° cu o 00 0 � � -a N v E m o o co cn > co 'a H W u W W nn W c v c c � N ro _� ro _� 41 O �r O O O C cu C O 4� cu QL c W Jill U O U O L U c H U W H U H W a "O N d C v CU �N W � L W _QL CAA C Lcu CAAro c C O O >, a) Q O c a1 a1 X O a1 Q O c i U -a CO Ln N O CO CO cu N CO to N O 4p C ° +• a1 ° O N : N to N u O U u z' = to ro wO Q C Q cu v u -p �- t6 O a1 4- ro a 0 ro > O � a' v CU Ln Q �O co w E L C to +1 L a to E c�i� f0 O C: C v C O -0 p ° O two +L- O E 0) _n L1 cu nn n v � v N ° > O o c gyro O n two awnro c oc o r o o w L C6 o Q c •no v o v E m y o cuo o Q V W � `n o c a1 Ln ro - ro U co cuO ro N V V N C = U LnL ,�,,, >� ++ CU cn 0) > v ro O a) = L tiAcu 0 ro 0 cu 0 -p N N 41 > N S 41 Q 4- `J �O 0 O W U 0 'L +, CJ CU fC to , L � ++ ° z Ol U C o C W CJ N C C E o pill Q O to Q O W C 41 +� m C > _� N 41.E N A a'' L1 ''"'' _ � L y C OL fC cu cu III = 'a a1 N a0—+ a1 O vOi E C c O "O _ _ O L b4 +' a1 c6 a1 a CO S > O -W C ��ii�llllll�� Q c o .0 v U ro .y" W A 41 41 N V = i >> Ou > _ Co C L L 'L CU ;� V C C Ou W = C6 L1 C6 O U V V +, L = L Y N u O O C u C L O ro '0 3 i 0 t6 5jim y/% EXCC 41 X O O G1 F G 41 L 41 W 4— U W W cn d ro Q J e—I N M cf LA Q O O � _ M co q / / ro ro § 2 § ? ro U cu 2 'S § U- \ 3 cu / ro 0 / a241 \ c ƒ f ? c — o k uo ro a- � ? c 7 m J Q & aq ? LO>- q c & o c & \ ƒ ƒ \ e \ \ \ # v 3 mc u $ \ ° % 0 � E2 / \ I n � 3 �3 � c g u { ro 0 2 q ® QLQ » C)- ® . CU / \ # / F 2 E ° / ? ®n 0- o I » o 0- 1 — > \ G CU> m 3 2 \ / 0 . � f a— � I ■ u � m u # # e 2 � @ 2 ƒ w 3 E Ilk \ / \ § 2 / \ cu a)u E 5 u \ (%« 0 3 � \ u � � KEY WEST �llllft 'I �i III! 'I 1 �; ' Part II: Major Projects "The best mtqi to pr rlkt Me future is to cr rrt. lt. Peter Drucker, L rrrl rr in Me dev loprnent of management education r ���,,�E�fi� ���� 1 ull,i , u�/ '/�� � is �� J/,/�;✓����,/i �,/%i/i ,;�, � / �1 %% , li //,I?111 it �n��� o,%°.�'✓/ '� '� >f/i'/�%�l�i✓;,%%��I �G,.� „%Jii 9`ii %�� �/ ��%/��/�'�/ ���/ '/�� �f%Gi/i/l�/ ✓/� %%/ir, !/�//ri o/fir r �i,/, Ji �1 /i/% I Y � w"r wwi, �e Iwf��;� �%✓;r t�I�1J,��i/ 4��t a �1,,, H �� ry 1 rt l ail'(� i�✓ i i�i �� � ✓ rr � ' � l ✓�ir� y , rw PI/�N �� ��/✓� �o,�a! /,4 F01 l Il A1Ni ,, �1��„',7 ,-,' ✓ >> �G„P/GAS W 44 86 of 40L2832 M M co N Ln co a1 vi vi cu N m rri ro CD O UN Q rj O L O N O N C N O O O � L L CDU- 41 >- + 00 t6 O L n L `n LL -OQL n CU O -O t/? L t6 lD ro O (1 a1 r) -0CU 4� co `� M N I + 41 m -0 L N I N _O nA t6 N two � O iJ? N Q O Q ro C LL u ro C 0_ C CJ CJ ro L f6 CD in _ N O O v O C O O C "p O CD Q v L C O O O U 4- N +, L +, Ln O p O O O E (9 •� Lq L 70 "O O I U C C�J 000 CJ �-I = 41 r-I "6 Ln N � 41 E O i/? LL U = a1 tw Y N L O W C "6 O i II > � W �Imumumuu (� W LW N 0. L ui N p 41 C C C C _� _� Ln CL L �4- 0_ LLJ 0_ � f6 .2 N CC 41 +, " i cu cu 41 +r cu N ro 7a ro 0 ro N N cu cu a1 a a1 a1 O cn 41 C 41 Ln L ,— WLn 41 +� CM,, 41 cu fW0 f�0 cn 41 ,Q; v N E 41 +1 � � cn C cu "6 � � N O C � no C6 cu 0 � Q � C a1 O o o v O L ro � E ro O -a o —A Y 06 ro o u nQv -am n o c cu � v °�' c CO ro a1 U p O a1 LCU u -O -O a1 �- `n cn i LOL -0 v E CJ JD f�6 +�+ f6 41 O JD E 0- O Lu v fro OC 0_ C r) Lo Q LLJ .N O >- CU u 41cu • • • • • • • • .O • • • • • -p CU 0 O CU +� L ro ' ilia v x au uj N C Q o u u cu ( m (UcuT, > ��Ip N 0, j1 II II�� o LO a+ 5ij Ln v N (UL +, 41 0 0 > v O Q (9 (D Q O 41 C (U (c9 +� Y ~ -I N M d M co N co N M +' L \ \ O L O �O N N N O 4- -p N N LL LL — a1 L cu L L L LL CU N ro i� M O O uj LL � d "O "O d OL -r14 cu cu 0- cu a1 — LL ro N >- ro N u u a1 -p U- u — a1 U' } O O +J �n "CS "6 -a ro a) Ln C "- co co u -0 C O C ro O o C .� C C LO `ro � ILL N f6 N CD C O O to — V C r) roO ro O CD _ _ _ r _ CD O d t11 00 +, U N N O CJ ap CDC cn L •N N lD C co rl rl rl rl rl O = cn o o N O t/)- t/)- t/)- t/)- t/)- LL U LL m U u u N N W a1 a1 •� a-•' Q Q C Q jC C a1 ro r) L L a- N L to cu CU L O L 5 L L N L N L bz ro N (1 cu N a) N a1 C C N o cu cu E v ECCU E -0 tiA tiA E 'hp E hp O E co a w w U w U w d U U ro m CCU N O d. N N N N N N i NCU ro cu CD — N ro ro ON � ON LL ro C p 1 N u a1 t6 N "p cu +'' a) qA -p m a1 L CO "p c 41 � Q � +� +� O L to aa) L G CO = N Q C ro cu C OL O0 Q ro 0ro 0 , CO N Q O N two nA "C O Q a) "a Q a1a) C ro ' o c W c� N o "a a1 u — C O = O L t6 a1 a) CU V m a1 +� a1 "O a) to L1 a1 cn cu ro U Q r ro m i .L a1 Co C LL o d E N bA Yc co O a1 -p Q O V �0 cu Ln E Ovo 0 m w o�c N O r) U E E ro • • • • • • 0 • • 0 • • a1 � U Q cn m 0- C ro 0 0 0 o d d d d "CS i N M 4 _ °il Lu nn m Uu (D = v o ro N a v E F° 5iji yi v ro Q N m m cu O d Ln 00 r) rH LO M co N v > no ,, ro m v H u UO ro C -� ro N ~ -0 cu v O v +� au +, i} N cu ro v +1 U "O -p •`� ucu C 1}L C o a1 cu LCU C L C a+ C cu ro O +, bp cu a) V .L.. N a) ro Ea1 C cn O ro "a u "O cu u u O N = OL "6 N ro O = CU Q L Co cn L •� •N Co C N cu cn cu ro CCU ro CDCD � = CU O N rt O Ln Q +r X N 00 Z -U'). i� Z a1 Z >. C tJ? L Q N tw L1 a1 O Q L Q O cu cu L cu N a) C 1 Ctw p L U.i "C N ?: bz L C cu cn O E .� c cu cu E C U a a w ro a1 u O C co +� p Q C :, 3 co > + N ro i a1 rl "CS C: to L N a1 c U ON E QL CD4; tL6 v Q d •70 d E � Q LO = NO -a NO Ou C V a1 O cn c N to N to j,L O N U -p N ,� a1 a1 •� -p L N +' � >, — a) � C]A C twro O Q i i +� O C a1 C ro -p C a1 +� nA p +- Q O a1 ro E _ a1 Q a1 a1 cn V N C W C co W ro O v a) N .0 CC Q +, Q 0 C u = L N E G E > Q E u v C N v a1 can1 L + \ O uO QO - OC E ro "a O -0 ro O d cn U N � L1 d a1 U w d ro ro O C • • • • • • • E • • E • 4� 41 ro o v CL Z w w a X ro cu F— :ij C C U) co v 41.E .� cn W I N W II u a1 co Q a1 }- W L LL O +� to W L 61J cu C ro >, _ > cr o- +, O v N U p cn C O ,� p p a) 5iji � O �O Q C O tw C z U U -I N M .4 C �' -I rH rH rH KEY WEST 11 % IFNO v I Part III: The Communication Strategy "''The single problern in cornrnunicc7tion it the illusion t.hrrt lt. hrr.r t.rrlrn ph:,���° �. George iriir irrl &haw f r / 48 90 of 40L2836 KEY WEST 11 % IFN0 V I TlIE KEY WEST COMMUNICATION w, mw I. Overview of the Communications Strategy for Key West The Key West Community's Request for More Communication For the City of Key West,fewer than half of community members who answered the 2021 survey rated communication positively. In fact, in the narrative portion of the survey the lack of "communication" was cited as the number one answer to the question "What is one thing City Leadership (Mayor, City Manager, City Commission) could do to better serve our community?" According to respondents, the problem is two-fold. First, community members do not receive information about happenings, decisions and major initiatives in the City. Second, there are not enough opportunities for individuals to provide feedback and input. A sound communication strategy should be a "two-way street" in which information is given, and input is received and integrated. Reaching People in the Information Age:Multiple Channels and the "Rule of 3" Studies show that a typical PIO may use up to 16 different strategies to reach the community, and that individuals need to receive a message 3 times in 3 different ways to retain the information,. With those rules in mind, choosing our messages strategically and judiciously is essential. A sound strategy should include a multitude of direct and indirect communication channels to share just one important message. Inclusion For an island of only 26,000 residents, Key West is tremendously diverse. It is home to a substantial immigrant population from Haiti, Central America, Eastern Europe, Central Asia and other countries. Multilingualism is the norm, and many areas of the island contain national/regional enclaves in which English is not the first language. Communities of color are often left out of communication, and therefore not able to ensure their voices are heard and represented. 49 91 of 40L2837 KEY WEST 11 % IFN0 V I A critical component of the City's communication strategy is to reach non-native speaking, culturally diverse populations and communities of color. This can be done through message translation, as well as targeted marketing efforts through social, and religious institutions and within specific neighborhoods. (As an example, when administering the Community Survey, the team delivered the survey in Creole and Spanish to Pastors throughout the community to share with congregations, and hung flyers in neighborhoods in which large populations of Haitian and Central American community members live). The strategies that follow aim to strengthen the City's process of sharing information and receiving input. Our current PIO is already utilizing may of the channels to get information out to the community. Sharing Information — 12 Channels There are 12 channels for communication we can use with the community. Some we already utilize, and others we can initiate as part of a larger strategy. As many channels as possible should be multilingual (English, Spanish, Creole). 50 92 of 40L2838 M co N N O rt' 4- O M N ',ww LZ :3 W m U U c 7 N Z N I O � � V � F- + °� 41 O +. ° ago a� J N = f0 7 LL 1 X O 3 A N O 3 m -W \ ~ CL _ C N W = Q i� in j v-O 3 m C o C � Uj i o !Q Q H X C L. Ln .Q N O 2 N „, C O vi H > c t O ' Dili N W N a S (li E V 't = E ate. = c^i ola E o °c •N ° c a o °' `° *' c m +. . ro o. - �YCL o CL M muj � V v Ln c v _ .mac E x a c ao 'ca c� uiCL i- ? c e-i N : Li- w 0 Iq 00 N (N / O W Cm G CW G Lr) bb C� G a N C o G O = a = a bb :1Z = v _ 24 O Q. = Q. i U +' v >' E W O a.+ = ate+ = C i V �0 O _ _ _ H ~ CL +O+ y 00 V Y i a.+ M m O = +•' s. OQ > E +., +. E Q o —'' � z —'' o °' o 0 All a0+ �+ W -a .a N W = plll _ O 3 = N w N -Wm = _ C E u = ra . __ �' ra 3 aoi vi o 9 f0 N a=.+ f0 i = e1j •=� C ++ O = 3 = N O. Ow O �. = o E O E _ c a, �ii�lllll�� 3 W 3 ca t +. z CA ui CL Sao a BYO = a>' 0 u° -° uoma ¢ w V � L 5jjjj yi W '^ c = a, o CC •°Q o ° 3 cL = ca z U- N a oc Y = 3 o Y E 14 CL ni ni L6 k Z-- 41 ._ Ln W CO 0 16 Q Q T— dq co N YCU L L cu cu N O u C cuE E O ro W N O O N > O cu cu 0 0 C 4— � cu s � CL O f° Q o CL � C 0 cu E � O C cu Q U L L L 30 -O cu O N O ^ >, 3 O C v� �O N O co L co 3 +on J C Y (B C L cn E u .cn dA co 41 C O > > n L ro " u _� o C cu (o U ro 4-- m cum O C 3 C y 1 — M >� m Q O G c C m . 3 3 U,) tw O co� 0 � ( vi E rn +� 0 3 � +J +' C U L u N cu N � U co on L N > N on C ro co `L° On E E w ._ O N N N C U +� N O u O co L cn 0)N " -C 4 4 Q y 4y > 1-0M L 'In -C E y 4- a-. C O U N (o 'C O 3 4- 4O GJ 4 J cuN +J C O co n + L 0 'uC U E a p N C Q L Q O N m O O � -C n L > ou E > E L N Y O F L L L -C L a1 - L Q O C m m O O M C 142 L O O S O Ln ro 0cu _ N 1 N 4c CU 4— J cu vi > N C t O cuob O > m C > L > +, O C y W U 41 O CL 147 U co 0 41 (o t ma cu N M � � ��' cu V1 N /Y��/// U +J L G -C E a = E .N Y� cu -0 �� cu N cu ~ U Y > N L C W C i 4J v N 3 +� N N 0 i .Q _O 3 O � _ E c op coIdd N c � � F C 4 N G C � G > O tw 3 O 4 J 0 W O i V rco >, N 4J 4c OA tW > CL N L H = 'a -a O +' F— L u L n u U D co l7 O (A > H N a.. C C C 3 0 ma O D U. w 0 L1 u N p M �' C _H p O N— _ 4� O Q III Z -a ro Ri" ki bp to �u Ilui o o E F°- ' u�llll c ra co o to f +� 0 w a LL ��5ij�,? 0) m O L o } p M, N c M v — co E Ecu y ai au Q Z ° kJ i q �4 c m oo — ;-i ru cn ... 4 ac r LA KEY WEST 11 dui IFNO V I III. Budget (annually) As of now,there are no funds allocated to the PIO activities in the budget(E.g., PR materials such as banners, graphic designer for flyers, direct mailings). Items Estimated Cost (Preliminary) Direct mailings 2 per year (includes design) $30,000 Flyers 5,000 per year @.86 cents per copy $4,300 Banners 5 per year at $90 per banner $450 Hanging Banners $3,000 (not confirmed) Estimated Total $35,750 54 96 of 40L2842 KEY WEST I %' IFNO v i I Part IV: The Employee Plan I rrrr.ri i.s riot. rrrut. being ir cl'ulr t " '� � i,it t� �i� ° � r i )f t� �)� � � � � � s in your j ,,,, �� �,�iwo mrw+w rw�uyu, �yyrmlwu v�uuiuN7�9niPl�uhu GwiNl9uhrif3wu^7"V�P /'� t, %fll//� lyl' OWN ljj 55 97 of 40L2843 KEY WEST 11 dui IFN0 V I I II�IRNAL PLAN POP I E C I Y EMPLOYEES Introduction A solid "internal architecture" within a municipality is the basis for success. Without adequate staff, fair compensation and consistent communication, it is impossible to be efficient and fully effective. In March 2021,the City of Key West conducted its first Employee Survey in many years. The survey results showed that while some aspects of the institution are highly regarded, (colleagues relationships,job enjoyment), morale is extremely low, scoring an average of 2.6 out of 5. There are five primary reasons for that score (see below), all of which need to be addressed across most departments. In April 2021, the Interim City Manager, HR Director and Strategic Planning Consultant conducted focus groups with staff from each department to devise solutions. Those ideas are reflected in this document. The most glaring need that emerged from the survey and the focus groups is compensation and staffing (grade and new positions). While other issues matter, without addressing this need, morale will more than likely continue to deteriorate. The potential repercussions are severe in terms of staff retention, motivation and the ability to deliver the City's most fundamental services to residents. The plan will therefore require significant funds over the next three years and beyond. Still, compensation alone does not lead to employee engagement. We must also address communication, employee recognition and teamwork. The recommendations that follow come directly from front line staff. They are do-able and feasible requests that are implemented in many institutions big and small. In the City of Key West, we must first get our own "house" in order, and only then can we better serve our community. Results from the 2021 City of Key West Employee Survey What's Working? (Top 5 Wins) What's Not Working? (Top 5 Challenges) 1. Job Enjoyment 1. Compensation 2. Middle Management 2. Staffing 3. Diversity 3. Communication 4. Benefits 4. Recognition 5. Teamwork Within Departments 5. Teamwork Between Departments 56 98 of 40L2844 LO dq co N 4 N CU A' Q 4, cn u N O O W -0 � O >. N O � j, O +, O c O O LL p V 41 N N O Q O O ro E v E W v r_n N U c +, O a1 i O 4A U a-+ Q1 Q Z +� c v ro v V v ro ro c c L 0 CU ro ro L a v v v CD O no nn nn 3 = o L c c c y- L CU CY) ro ro ro 0 TWO _ CU O t CL U U U r dA y a1 � L a. CDN r U ,N p O W O � L .a a, °1 v c +' N -r3 (� N a N c-I C cu E Lf1 G O nA C t u CU ° c +c+ CU N N -0 C Co (o O — O ro N +1 (U = v to to 41 c C O ro ro a O 41 O � a +� 3 L v W v 0 ro c O F L N N Q O N c a1 a1 o L v c W U > Q c C N � _ c vW Q C O CU V u "a ro O N a1 a "o o c v 3 Q ro • a, v c -a +, v m L O Q -a c a) (U o2S v v a CU O s o u v tw .- c ? Q L = U dA V C c L m E CL C O �p N "p N O +O+ d O tea +� co O }? co O +� ,� bD E a1 _ N N N c to — u Q to y_ +�p 4° O > II O -0 41O O o O c c AI N y c = ro 41 � O COUj � y � O _ C Co cn V Co �ii�llllll�� CU v v E o (UO CL v cu u LU O 0 c > V 41 41 o V U O U O O rl N U ON Ll co — �I N 1ID6 m Q O N o Q Q (D Iq co q ? ? 7 7 cr k 3 k 3 ƒ ƒ CD 2 2 \ \ / " / L- % / / / / / £ £ O 3 O 3 $ ? q 2 QL � E ° / E u f # q E 0 > k q Ln ƒ e @ E O 0 ro § % 34.1 d \ \ § � f 4- w E \ d c / k / § •/ / 0 8 E 7a ƒ UJ & £ § m � •% 0 D 2 § E o � ■ QL mfak CL F � / CL 2 0 ® # n uj e » � � ƒ © � � � k E # u U.JS d u cu c \ ti dq co N tr, v I� v N > N N N N OW, two O O O O O O O O Q Z Z Z Z CU +� au O C a1 ro ro +' qA � C 0 ro � rO O � Q cu � 4� p � a1 u Ln 'O ro ro f L L C.) L L 'N L L = a uo uo X O W Q w f6 Ln W C O •4..i ro ro L.LJ ro cu ro 4 j ro c C C C > u c E CDCo Co +, Co Co 41 Co ro C G G •� +' G G L L r r_n _O N _ v _ p[ v • U U d Q U W u = u r) CU U cu Fu L L cu 41 N cu O cu C a1 -r3 E Q = E N = L N E N N cu E V- N O to 0- 0 -1 O -p > O O > O vj cn N LL cn N cn N _ N u N Q1 Q1 � 41 ro _O -p0 nA cu rn vi V = - �n �O O a)CU u to C +1 � � ro �, O vi O n C L O ro + O c� a1 Q '� u -0 ro O C a wl O +� �S t6 41a) m ro ro LU _ � 0- = '� N LU O Q vi E C cu cu 0 roL N > L Q a to a1 cn U 'n N C N v O -0 _ _ Z O C a)r6 Q a ro O C C C L w to ++ •L•.i L O Q •N 0 -0 iE O -t to O E C G1 E u ro Q 0 V i vi •� s v v E o +, " v 0 N o v c o v Ln C)- ro ° v v_ .N Q non > _' Q v o c o — Y � �„ 0 '" N ° c v a t u 3 ro 41 y co u U v v ; oA iri co of +� c v p > O p t S dA 1 = dA E to >- Q a1 d N vi o co v " Q —0Q v v v 3 v o -aLn ro C� 3 C� v v L u •Q 41 C ro cud -CS G cu 41 G - L Qbb `L° d v _ Q " Lw c +� O C tea O -p cLo °' C C Q N L O o }, o v r0 0 3 o > ro ro nA C° O 10 °II C 'n +� L Q a1 4- O GX1 •C v > N N to 41 41 (L6 O 0 > "6 N N °'° u _ -a 3 o J o a=i v v aci n o °�'° p v -a N O oilO Ln >, `° ro > °+�' C no E nNA c E E 0 L a,o c o Q Q IIIIp ro N C O �i E Q t 4- W " a W •0 ro Q L = to O W L CAD t O Q O cn t6 > 61J O U E Q > to m 41 O 41 t6 (1 w O L N L "CS w v a uJ W C E E G E N � O Y�)lID6 — � M cf" tf1 co Iq co CN 0 ro cu cu cL E " 0 0 CD 0 0 0 u u 0 1 , u 0 0 � -2 0 z z z 2.0 4.1 Ln 2(U Ln cu cu 'n E W C:4-j ro 0 E m 0 4- ro W u ro CD 4-j 0 CD < 4- 0 " 0 u ro CN ro CD 0 2 0 ro u ro r14 CD E 75 >- 'S r14 = a) U r,4 QL r,4 E rj 4� r,4 > - r14 V) r14 ro CU :3 0 :3 U 0 " m 0 > ro >- 0 LL CO v) r,4 0 r,4 < Jt) r,4 rj cu 0 cu 0 r) 3: cu Ln (.0 E -a +1 -0 (U CU ro cu M -C -r (U ro ro W CU cu 4- W ro cu cu a) ro u u 0 (U C: ro (U U a) u " w LO 0 0 M CU c ** c cu C: >� 6 E 0 0 .- M V) C: +1 cu CA _0 0 -0 -0 .- " — cu (U a) 2 70 0 < cu a) .Ln — . (U ro E ro CU u z 41 E E r"o 7i M =) u +, E -uc: c' W = COW - w 0 bp Ln F m 0 ro >- CL U CU 0 (U -LU -0 U C: ro C: E a) ro cu zu- cu m r ro ro CU m a) u o ro > 0 E -0 :; ro 0 0) = ro > E " 3: >. 2 41 L- ro 0 W Q- ro (A ® m 0 > .70 a) a) 0) CU a Ll w r) (1) > M X -0 +, >. LL cu C C: 0 Q- 0 cu ro c 0 (U 0 CU 0 co 3: cu — E -0 a a) (U U-1 u a T w E = -0 r 0 2 c: >. Ln +, E LL 0 0 Ln 0 > CU ui 0 ■0 cu cu T , n E >Ln - fu (U E ro cu cu p (u E CU ro w .u C) M U.J E w x 0 CU 2 -0 0 -0 0 ro (A ro 0 a-0 -0 CU -0>- C: E 5 C)- C�L6 r 06 0) Iq co CN O cu 00 cu rO 4j). 0O CL c r,4 E 0 ro u ro cu ro II CU CU 4� CD CU CU>. b.0 Ln ro C5 0 CL ro CD 0 u cu cu 0 I�t ro > 0 z qj)- CU ro z d• ro cu ro ro +1 Ln O -0 cu CU ro W cu ro bb :3 bD cu (N ro Ln CD cu cu ro " Ln M > C 0 cn ro to ro ro c 0 > co cu >� CU CU CU >, E CD cu cu W a- W 4� x 0 L.Li U ro ro ro c Ln C CL cu ro ro cu cu r) ro I W LL rH L (3) r,4 S (3) tlA CD 0 rq E rH W r14 W rj L N E rj CU CU 4- c CD CD = CD -S-- co 0 0 r14 LO r14 LO r14 21 cu (.0 CU x Ln cu o 4=o C7- -r3 cu 0 cu .- cu W w ro Ln 5.Ln -0 lu cu ro ro ro C: -0 'n 0 +, cu > 0 Co -0 ro < 0 c CoQ� ro cu — CU CU -a ro cu " 'n c ro cu ro CU ro > cu E 0 ro 0 0 E cu c CU cu cu cu Q- o cu 0 Ln 3: +, 0 -.: ro c 0 ro cu >. 0 cu cu c CU C: ro ro cu 0 CUto ro E m E .— s 41 ro CU -2 +, to o CU CU 0 ro ro w tw E cu 0 > to m >. -0 -0 ro cu ui cu >- ro = > :t M W 0 X ro -0 4- 'A Q) Q) u Q) Q) ro w = Q) Ln ro 'n Q)ro 0 w ro Q) E Ln C: = c I E ro CU > ro Q) 0 0 CA CU > ro ro E > >. +1 ro >., ro cu c- w (1) 0 (3) Q) C C: ro u CU '0 +, -0 .= = r) cu ro LD 'n 0 Q- Ln m ro — = +1 E c E m_ 0 0 rco)- E ro ro 0 L.Li ro W0 cu 0 0 — " a) W CU .2 0 -a w EE ro 'a I--# ro 4- m = -0" " W 'n cu 0 0 0 L CS 3 +1 o w > w M _.,, >. +, " c W 01 CU cu -0 a- ui w C: ro ro I- I 0 E CU 4' +-' cu > tw 0 w In cu cu CU cu 0 0 - r- cu M ro ui Ln S- < W .2 r"o 5. -4-- —CL 0. " ro cr CU 0- 0 cu a) uo > u OL ro -0 ro E cu ro ro a E CU ro 0) CU ro x -a w >- c w 'n bD CU CU F- ilo 0 CU -0 CU cu 0 ro CU b4 0 C') u S 0 E CU 0 a) ui a) —Q� cu Ln c cic a ro +, u -i-u 2 >- = 0) ro 0 c 0 0 Lu E :3 c :3 cu u = m E 0 0 cic .0 — U (3) 0) (3) (3) ui (3) :3 o ta. U-j :t cu — Ln ro uo -a m E cu E W U ro +� 0 ro E > E 0 0 7a CU w E -F 0 cu w cu L- - 7a -a 0 E C: (2- QL LU CU > 0 ro cu E E E a C- cu - — cu >. U.J a ui -S-- �7- cu o +, — — u r) ui Lu r) 4. > U- — u r_n 0 CU W 1- 0 o o Q- 0 u C,- (D 0 p co q 0 u 0 2 -0 c n � � 7 � ƒ / CU c \ 0 \ k / % r) / / 2 $ \ q m ._ CD\ : / & u DL £ -0 / \ rrlj © 7 \ � \ \ 2 E « 1 \ a \ n k 2 2 0 ro \ � / / \ ® g E / j / % 4- j $ 0- f c -0 � m F g k 2 / / LLJ § ° c } % � 2 uj 0 e ® C)- } (.0 ' E m 3: 0 can) E / w 3 & u 0 \ f � S ( m 5iji 0 Q � 3« T— LO co CN cu cu cu 41 ro 41 0 b4 f fp 41 cu 4� 4�CU x w E CU > Ln = ro — > u cu cu E E cu 0 W w w ro 0 4. --4� ro W 41 N 4 ro cu � e E = w - Cln 4� 0 4� 0 c cu E tcn: 0 = > 0 z U- cu Z US US 42 =tn 40- E can CW =u u4j 4� 0 cro CU 4� CU cu tw to CU ro -0 2t c 0 CN co CD cu a) cu tw tw+1 CO ro 0 CU a ro c c LO C ro ro CD 0 ro+1 0 0 u u u Ll CU 41 -0 CU W cu cu cu • cu E bA E E rH -1 rH 0 E ro CU E rj +1 Lo r,4 tw I- I( a) -1 CD 0 Ln c CD c 121 CO Lo r,4 u cu r14 0 ro ro rn CU -0 (.0 ZI 0 c ro E M 4- ro M O 0 0 0- 0-— ro 0 -U 4� .- L- CL CL CU cu cu >- am 0 m cu ro 4- U 0 0 0 0 cu a) E C: 0 E E u -0 > to 0 0 4�-a wwo m c cu 4' ro fa Ln CU cu cu -0 0 0 E —TOC CU CU ro 0 41 CU Z5 > = .— " 4- (U E I I co c: LO I cu CL E C: w c W cu L- W cu W c ro fU (U 4� 1-4 cu 4- co CU co -0 0 C: (u V) (U -r3 CU 0 _j LU r_ W.. C: ca c CA CU co 0 w (U E fca .2 CU cu CU CU ro U-0 -0 -0 UJ >- to O 6 — CU CU — u 0- -0 a C: 4� m CU CU C: 0) W cu E c 0 0 C: ro cu 0 " D C: L- > -" (u E b4 c- cu C: 11 E 0 0 W C: C: E cu • LO fu (U (U UJ C: E ro o > (u E (U 0 0 bP 4- CU M ro 0 cu c ro m fu CU W C Fm +1 c 0 M (U w aL 0 cu Lmm 0 E LU E (D Lo u 0 o 0 >. cu >- uO E Z) E 0 ma LU m z u 7E E rj ro' Ln, cu (u Qj 0 0 E E r4 N uj E 0 m CU Ln KEY WEST A AA SIII ; oirw V Annexes Jeveir. doubt a sr,inahI grot III of tlaoughffuII, (:orru-nitted, ca iz iri (:airi cliairig dhe wor.Ihi IIrideed, it is tl'ie orfly tl,iiiri t[iat ever. has." - Margaret Mead 1. Monitoring and Accountability of the Plan 2. The budget for FY21/22 3. The January 2021 Community Survey Report 0 0 o „ ;,fir 11�, / F �� Illui�l�� Li Wp ii r� o � ! r 4.1 ti 64 106 of 40L2852 KEY WEST 4 A,AA 5 ;; Plu)r Annex 1 arid for the Strategi�c Plari During the August 2021 retreat, Department Heads, City Leadership and the Commission were asked to establish agreements on how the Operation Plan each year will be monitored, measured and reported. Questions and answers in that conversations are listed below. 1. How often do you (Dept Heads) want to have check ins to monitor progress? (Monthly, quarterly, every other month?) Every other month. (First check in — November 2021) 2. Would you (Dept Heads) like calendar reminders for "due dates" in addition to copies of the log frame? Yes, Elisa will submit calendar updates as needed to each department head with due dates. 3. Would you like to use a shared project management software? (Wrike, Monday.com, Etc.,) or are the log frame, calendar and check in meetings enough? No, the check in and calendar updates will suffice. 4. How can the Commission ensure that we stay on track? (If the Commission wants to do something that departs from the plan,who should address it and when?) The City Manager will remind Commissioners when an item is not part of the strategic plan, and encourage them to stick to the plan in as far as possible. (It is expected that new needs will arise). Further, all executive summaries should refer to the strategic plan when relevant. 5. How often should we have SIR workshops? (Can we use them for other big picture topics?) Three times per year. The morning for Commission, Department Heads and City Leadership and the afternoon for Commission and City Leadership. Workshops will focus on one or two major items that need to be examined and discussed (E.g., Accountability of Commission decisions, visions for the Diesel Plan, Improving relationships with our partners, working on housing with the Navy, Long-term Adaptation Strategies; Truman Annex housing; pursuing waste energy and water 65 107 of 40L2853 KEY WEST Plu)r re-use, Etc.) The City Manager will schedule the workshops at the start of each fiscal year. At least four to six weeks prior to each workshop, the focus will be decided based on input from the Commission. 6. How would the Commission and Dept. Heads like to be updated on the plan? At the workshops as necessary, and a quarterly presentation at Commission meetings. 7. How can we ensure communication, accountability and follow-through on directives, decisions and resolutions from the Commission? A. City Department Meetings: City Manager will update Department Heads at meetings on major decisions and actions. B. Legal Department follow through on Decisions: The Legal Departments will work with each relevant department on decisions to see them through. C. Orientation: A summary of all major resolutions will be incorporated into the new employee training. D. Staff Updates: Staff will receive updates through "notify me" sign ups via text and the employee newsletter. E. Checklists: Staff will create "checklists" to ensure that all decisions are adhered to (E.g., in licensing and building) F. Accountability Meetings: Based on a new decision or resolution, the City Manager will convene a meeting with relevant parties to identify methods of enforcement and accountability (E.g., mandatory recycling for businesses would require a meeting with Code and WM.) 8. How can leadership develop a long-term (10-year) financial forecast to support the strategic plan? The City Manager and Finance Director will organize a Working Group to identify and create a plan for developing a long term funding strategy. The group should include the Legal Affairs Coordinator from Monroe County. Funding streams and legislative actions to be considered include: • Lobbying the County and State on 2nd home taxes, alcohol tax, a larger share of the bed tax, Etc. • BIDs/Special Taxing Districts • Bonding • Fining illegal rentals • Charging tourists for entry to Truman Waterfront, etc. 66 108 of 40L2854 LO LO co CN 0 p CLcu x .2 4� cu 4a 4� 0 x a- 4a 4a 7500 0 a u CU m 0 0 c 0 c r 0 u 0 _C (�4 C:ai 4� LLO 0� -C E E 4a " mu " u CU 0 cu r- CU 0 ai :3 a) 0 0- o E 0 1-- u -La 4� " u m " E Lj- Lj- Nm :3 0 M C: c QmN 4� =3 m CL 4� C: 4- -1-- 0 0 .3 0 0 0 on .- 0 C u 0 -C C 4- -1-- 4- L 4- m 4>z 0 r: >- 0 CL ba m c a tw 0 rj M rj 0 " c .— (N u -I- u 4� Ln 0 CL CD Ch -0 c Ln 4- O 0 cu m r4 M 0 cu 4- -0 • u 41 M CL 0 -s-- .2 0 he -1 M 0 o —he c rt 0 Ln "I u -0 4� hd m a C> 4 N on on CU tr " 11 00 =3 (1) Ln ro 0 (1) 0 . N r4 cu 0 N N -tr NN " Ln N12 q 0 'n u c 0 LL z 4� u 0 -le u cu 0 E >- > CU tn cu 4� 0 NE 0 M -0 N0 o 4� 0 4- •- 0 cu cu m m > m -C 0 m M 4� Ln 4-J LU 4� (13 0 c 0 c cu 4, 0 on -0 cu — 4' .0 cu " C 4J -0 c cu r-I C CU CU ED L- CU CL cu E Ln m 0 E CL on =3 0 E cu �A E o >� on 0 4� -Fo .2! 41 'n 4, a) cu — (D 4a M 1A -C -C E cu 0 LL cu (13 :t LL 21 0 E 0 CU 4a U- 4a 4a 4"� m c: 4� cu c 0 0 0 U- 4� m r- cu On 0 c m u lO C: CU E c: 4a > 7 cu Ln 'S Ln u to C: 0 4a 4a Go r m = C- a 'A I • >- u mumumumumum r o E cu Fa t) Z� m a -2 m " 0 41 -c E 0 — 0) CL o " c u cu 0 x -0 c 4- -0 0) 4� z m m 4' C 0 OC M 4a >z 0 0 30 cu " 4� Im -C < M tLo 0 -C 4� m cu to 0 41 cu w c c -6 M: CU _a 0 Z, 4- CC) -2 4� 0 L- le u u 4� tw 0 a m -0 on CU 0 w 4-J 0 m E 4� W 0 0 tw CU 0 1 M w CU > 0- m N -C 0 LL 0 14- LL u rn N d c < 4 > 4-J 0( CL uuuuuu C: cu E cu p 4� 0 c 0 0 -le 4- m 4� u 0 4� — u 0 4J 0 cr 0 3 __j w E U on 0 N cu 0 2 C: u U E cu 1A (13 ,q 4� (13 U 4� 0 41 S 4� c 0 c: C U- u cu tw -C m cu 142 Ln 4� 00 0- E 0 w c "I > 0 "1 a_ m 0 on cu Uj IN 0 0 0 CL co CIA x U U < N 4� >- uO N cu r- LU 0 u cu cu 0 Q. c Q. 0 0 0 cu 0 LZ 0 (D LO co CN cu c :t M CT) 4� D c m cu u cu 0 U bb a) ro x au a :t 4� ai cu ci LL. -0 _0 Ln 0 11,11,11,11, Y 4� m qj} 0) — LLO 4� a LnC: ci N Gb CL ro Ln U Nx on — 0 u u 0 CU ro c (10 �e :E 0 2 4 LLO u < 4� Ln V) 'In C m V) =3 = cu -6 c u U CL CU " Ln u dA m 0 0 -C 0 R* u u 4- V; -kn (N -0 w 0 M -',t 4a CD 0 • CL (D % U m 4' "= 0 4� r,,j 4� M cu U CJ (10 0 -2 .5 -%Ud CU CL on qj). -0 —1 > L 0 m m M cu 0 LLO 4� u m 4� (1) m x " 4a = >- CD -0 �e CL U -0 CU 0) Q) 4J c rq -0 611, LA CL 0) 4a CU m 4- Ln 11 1% cu rn rn c m CU ') m iA (D iA• V) 4j). 4j). ro Ln V V) :3 CY 4� ro cu 'n 0 ro 0 C: C 0 CL u cu tLo 4� 0 .- �: Y fu tY U z N c >- cu 4J 4, > LU -C u cu CL =3 cu cu u 0 4� z a 0 4� cu 4� cu z 4� CU cu cu 0 4� 4� _I_- >- m u r14 41 CU 4� LL- cu CU ��e Wcu 0 U -i " cu -C M 4� u ro 4� -C E CU m U u 4� cu cu C: " Ln cu o ,U— 0 E Ln > W0 >. 4� C: CL 3 L.0 0 M W cu 0 4� rn 0 C 4� C on 10 E E 0 "n -C qj)� F2 I-- E E 'u 2 3: m 0 Ln ro 4� 7; c w o o (U CO -0 0 -2 cu (U 0 �: c -a 43 E cu on u 0 -Fo E cu cu cu > cy, -0 0 -0 0 *7n — a = CU 4- m m CU C: m ' 3: , < c - w 76 rn =3 -C V�0 cu 0 dA o E CU cu U E 4c� 44�� -C - c Y E E x 0 0 -0 4� =3 E ("u u -C: CL 0 ��e V) cu =3 cu 0 7n " L.L cu cu u -0 CL -0 CO cu 4' 4� ca =3 0 cu 0 " CL 0 CU 0 0 0 W m 4' -C CL CL -0 a- -C on < 40- 0- 4J M LL LL Ln 4J 0) U >- 0� 0 CL 0 u cu cu V) 4� ro u c cu ro ro ro -0 u on cu c c cu 0 cu cu 0 u cu on 0 E tw 4� x tw -Fo 0 u o m cu CU >- on W0 a ca .7 CL 4'-C V) u -j =3 - cu CL E 4� 4�c ro ro ro 4� 4�-C cu Ln U-C co cu 'E w 0 on u cu cu on u 4� E (13 4' = cu LL -C CU cu -0 'n cu — Uj 0 U CU CU V) cu cu CT �: " cu CO u 0 CL CO 0 ro V) 4- m (D Ln CO >- cu 0 4- 4" u u CU CU m >- uO III " 'n >- on " = LU ��e 4� 0 CU 4, c Ws 0 -0 CU CU w 0 0 0 0 CL c CL E -0 -0 cu 0 =3 CL 4� cu 0 0 o o cu 0 ? N Ln 2 Ln I u u Ln > I I I- LO 00 N 0 N `n N -C O II II N _ in cu 4� C II O M O on ro O O qj,). O cn E II O ill} II O � _ O N dCD qn u O X O p i!} U N m m N O N O X 0) � p if')- Lfl p i!} to� X N II cn O C (V Q X N L X O cLo N y. O O 00 0) a Ln O i/} O w an C rl N a N O 4� Ln co N 4J 3 ro rl O (o i!} C L L ih N <!} O onn II M On E O O X +' i Q II Lf1 Q + do �- C E M 3 O On N qj,). CU u .� O On U 3 4J � J 11 n O _ C L 'In p 3 L � L �_ ? +1 4 J L 0 0 0 'a ca CL L (o CL G) O Q N O0 (o ill} i C co 3 N C a 3 r, E Q C ao an c E - C cu u O �a � o (n n i!} n 1 N W (B fC U a 4� V y (�0 a (C rY 4J O p U U O Q " N � �O ' Y .W.. c � �o C O Q 0 Q L z O Y Y N r C O) � •- C U O Y M 3 0 0 O p O) cu 0 0 r u c u C u N Ln O O) O C a- O E O w -c - 0 Ln � > r O (o -C e-4 N N N C (o O N LU 4� 4� Op r-{ N Q l7 - uLL H -kn cn -kn Q z v,)• U v,). J O O v,)• i/f Z cu cu c N o Yo O > dj � N J 00 N cuN co -0 co - O Q O 4- cu CC O d N 4� G on N (o N (o +•� 0 O (o O 0 0 C \ CO u 00 Q N m on L y CU ra y�j CL U > 4 j 111 4� a, N (o Q J '�-•� on >, N U (o � CO ra (o N •y (o N N U CO � 'a J O E N -C > � (Lo N +' 0 Y W Q LCU � .� U N 40 Q '> 61 W On 41 .� U O .� N - con � L d Q z � J cu 3 on •- co � cuO � o to CL 3 4- U D N O C O ro Q O 4- U 4- (o ;+� C 0 N O N l L +� cu u (o N C cu CU L (o V H oo . ii Y0)4— cO a � -0 CL o � aO 4o = oO s Uo U CU N .� >' cu Ocu C CU VLcu O cu Q L � 4� O O CL V1 M u in U C G _ O N L O + cu 2 'n do O N C o N oa CL U ? N (o V -C -C co O L U d ) cu C N 4� 3 c 4, (° O aO c a co C > N C On C N C N O (o O E C cn 4' O qlp 3 (o L VU onC CL W E - N Lnn LU III _ Q L Diu p u c -0 _ >- uO lull co � � o u � LU cu a ~ N (o Q au C ca co agoE W > Q -j LU (Co U w u f C co LO co N N N cn O C C N N O C O n 4� O N O E C L L p N a on N 3 Q C N 0 s p on tip <L > O u to O N L.L co O R N - N LL , O .L y N E u ? cV Q 4O O 4� C � > O bA O O nLU N 3 fp -0 Q U N CL �, O a, N C a E .0 4" - - - = t~� C M 4 LL, CO O W bA L O Q L ~ � L N ~ 11 cu u U 4� O O on 0 O cu Y U- Y �L ~ O Y Y u E ~ N Y 0 0 0 0 O � L Y Ln O O O O Y O O N 0 e-i 0 tD -- 0 Ln Ln O O C lD 0) N N -i to e-1 Vl lA c-I � E lD 3 i/f in i!} i/} i/} °'g$. i/} to i/f L L i/f L.L -kn i/f V)} V)} — in L.L W Z J : _ N Q m � m Z N +•' �^ W 0 L N C 3 4 O u +- LL > O L 0 Co L C O N CL onQ CL >- N i C C 1 +� (o p -0O � on on c >' O .� \ C 3 W N U m CL O U O tw N "- N . N 4- X -0 4- L o C -0 -0 N O > 4J N LL 'L p N tw C O U N 3 3 M d N N 3 U" +� L 4� m O w c O c tvD 4- 'In Q C N N O > 4O m C C •2 Ov O O Z 3 N L d'p CCL O on O m (o E u C (o C U C O cn — C °' 3 O +3 O (Lo LL N 5 L N 3 O C 372 N m N N -0Q p S 3 i 3 4� e N >, u -o C N OC N O p m _� w- N *' 3 OU O cu �- H 4- z L u co 3 N dp N E tD � -0 ; Nc O N cu N .� (o O G i N CL u (o N p 3 CC C N 0 co c N N - U' u d G U- L 4- 0 d 4- Q N L a (10 n O C O V) L N � 3 -C 4f c 1 .N Y cu Q c c N n C !ccO > . � Y -0G L (o •E cN i cu C O 3 m m •� c tL LL •0 U S on C L U m � in U CIA p u u LL C a N (() L O L a U- �G co E cu CL u O L Ero IIIIIIIir Q u N L L 0 u 0) LO co N cu Q Ln CU N 4.� > > O L > O C L U p Z N tU U � L +— U >. to o CL o L 4• +� C w on on u 4 J -0 Y N N w O (p C tU 3 .� > N CL N C tli -0CU cu L w onO L CU L y4a tv C O C 3 0) L +' LU LU -0 tU L > on3 Vl 0p a..' C .j� i U > cn NO c co .W.r to w O U L U U O O LL L Y GJ m m 3 m cu Q C E 7 C CU d \ N L > X O O on C 0) OU N V _ m 4� L LL V ~ UA 0 N 3 O O O N 'n O O Y U LL Q H Y C n E "— O N O N ,� E aci co O Y Y Y Y O Y N OM c a lLn M -i -1 °l N r q 3 m � U O O u � O M m •O L i N i/f i/f i/} i/} i/} •j). •j). LL 6A$ i/} -0 -C LU i/} i/} � Cl (LS 3 oo L tU O U O * ++ 4 J E CU L i (LS tU C cn '� C tU cn ,n C U M L u- C O cu tU C N O '� C •C tU 3 m -u E E C C m LU E ' g - � cts cts an as +, tv C �° � o CL tv N an -C cts u U C C 4' N 3 N a"' •� C cots p to U C -0U Z — O N 3 C t tU N tZ On O > .0 co tU N m Q tw 3 3 o 0 vi a o a N � v_ C p a a U a u o L l.7 O L � L N O Q tU O � O '� Q L U Cli N E C=C N L N L > f6 3 C O G N on N tU .y fLi !n CC L U -C Q U G 4- .� y p mO N cts m O E N N O > tw � 4— C N — L — . a U O � COC cc U L U co dA c O co Q J Ln G G .� 14S 7n u- •+� O ca � O U O C 3 ++ u E O CU E C N Ln p O f0 O U � O tB ++ U L f0 V1 0 j 0 L.L. 0 V1 ° � L N O �� L Q CU >' W. (LS OOD >� C U t > CL c L � co 3 •� cts m cn II� C7 c >. Diu � � � L I�III o ° uIII�1�uVPI m � � � � t,� ° Z c LU 1cu c = c U m cu c L o E E to to a ~ ° o IIOIIIir .E u 0 (D co N C � O C f0 Q bA a 0) a) cu U C H m -C a U a1 (0 U > cuO O a O m E N 0 fC cu > O O -a CJ >� m U N u & O 3 M C g C u E � a) aJ C CD O m O O ~ O CU m aJ on � U iA 00 i 4 N N � L O . -i e r IL C > c O O 'a .0 N cu m O _ CC_ N L 4 J a) C m O 4 J CU - > L1 m cu N m > u a w M O CU aJ 0 _ N N aJ CU U m CU m Y Q fLi 0 L aJ > C L Z dA L N C O L L O C co O CaC �a f6 ca a N u > O m w O O 4I-n O N L O V C L N N > 0 41 � v N m O 0 0 N y r O L m tw N O = •— L ca (O O N OL u 3 3 > 4J C L > .v � O N U I\ d Q v L N m O u +' -0 C � ca > ri C N O N w O L U 3 W 0 C t N0 30 > N wO aJ O •L L L O c a U : CU tW — O H O a) E "M do U cu co — = L > O O 3 aJ aJ W U � L N d V1 U � U 41S ~ W = 2 Y U (A C fl" N O O U ca U U > t C > Q o 3 L O O N N O aJ a C > o 3 w u a E >cu N O W L +� O qp U m E L N ca OU L p tw Q co N 3 -p a c a E cu cn Iuu CL -0 ia,r C C C O o fl E a IN o o Q a, >- IIU I� u N N w >, cu {�� Ua - N W C C, O E U Q N N N m C N U Q O 3 s E 3 U U H w V) f— U U E— IIII I�III(IIII'ff � � ca KEY WEST T A,3A 5��� ;; Annex 3: Report from the Community Survey, 01/21 Executive �is;µ d'r�:n ., .,). .p r�:,n ^„n r�:n .,) n s;, ^„n s' �.,��gy:' �.,��.,� ., r r�:n .,�':,ry d dr r�:,n a;,. .I, .I, ".," .I, s�,,,. d iii e a;,. .I, .,) d 4d P... tl�.,.tl�.��V��"��"�d�..�� �P... �"b�P...�P... tl�.,.d�..��"�.�r�.�d7�"b�P...�.�r d�..��.9 "p d�..��d�..��tl�,�d' d�..��.P...��"�tl�.��V��"�tl�.,.P...,„ Za��P... �"b��.�d7.�r� �d�:' �"�e d�.��V����tl�..��"�e d�.��V��"��,�,�r Za�s P... �"b��.�d7.�r� �d�:' tl�.,.d�..� d;°seah)rs'.°°°" _ Rohini Nflekani, author and philanthropist The Rationale for a Community Survey In 2020,The City Commission of Key West initiated their first strategic plan in almost a decade.The process began by gathering citizen input to establish priorities and unite the community around a common cause. Data from the survey is the bedrock of any strategic plan, as it ensures that municipal leadership truly serves and partners with the community. The survey was designed and administered by Elisa Levy, the consultant selected to manage the project. The consultant, who is based in Key West, has worked for more than two decades as a trainer, facilitator and strategic planner for organizations ranging from the United Nations to Fortune 500 Companies. The Process City Commissioners and Department Heads provided input into the draft prepared the consultant, and the survey was administered in five languages, (English, Spanish, Russian, French and Creole), via a variety of communication outlets including traditional and social media. A total of 3,776 community members completed the survey during a four-week period in January 2021.The survey captured input from a broad range of citizens, spanning the diverse age, socio-economic, cultural, racial and ethnic groups that comprise Key West. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: 1) Major Issues of Concern; 2) Planned Projects; and, 3) City Services and Amenities. Survey Results 1. Major Issues of Concern Two issues emerged from the survey with overwhelming community support: Affordable Housing was first, followed by Sea Level Rise. Respondents focused the need to build more housing, and regulate transient rentals. The emphasis for sea level rise was on flood mitigation and road elevation. 73 115 of 40L2861 KEY WEST T A,3A 5��� ;; 2. Planned Projects In accordance with sea level rise as a major issue of concern, respondents identified stormwater, sewer maintenance and pavement management as their top priorities on planned projects in Key West. For capital improvement initiatives, the priorities in order of importance are: 1) Revitalization of Duval St.; 2) the Greenway Project; and, 3) Bayview Park. 3. City Services and Amenities From 20 choices listed in the survey, 10 services and amenities emerged from respondents as the most significant challenges. (Each item below received more than 50% of combined ratings of "fair" and "poor.") 4. Additional Needs Three additional needs came from the narrative questions on the survey, including: 1)The Arts; 2) Youth and Families; and, 3) Environment/Green Initiatives. Respondents argued that the arts are central to any city, particularly Key West. Thus, there is a need to integrate the visual and performing arts into City initiatives when possible. (E.g., New housing, Duval St. Revitalization; re- purposing Mallory Square, Etc.)The point on youth and families focused on two needs:The first is to take into account youth and family when constructing new projects; the second is to introduce more youth and family friendly opportunities and programming. Many respondents argued for the need to take into the environment into account in capital improvement projects (E.g., net zero homes, utilizing recyclable materials when possible, Etc.,) 74 116 of 40L2862 KEY WEST 4 A,AA 5 ;; Plu)r Conclusion The 2021 Community Survey results suggest that residents who have called Key West their home for decades, now ponder whether they can remain in the community for the long term. The data shows that cost of living and affordable housing are the main reasons that approximately 42% of respondents feel unsure about their future here. The data gathered offers compelling,though not surprising results. It shows that the overwhelming majority of residents believe there is a vital and pressing need to have a long term plan in place for affordable housing and adaptation for sea level rise for years to come. Beyond these two dire concerns, respondents believe there are quality of life issues that require more immediate action. It is clear a from the 2015 survey conducted by the NRC, and the current 2021 survey that the City has still to make more headway on services and amenities primarily in parking, traffic control, and promoting eco-tourism.28 Despite these long and short term challenges, there is enthusiasm amongst community members about projects currently planned and underway in Key West. The data shows a clear set of priorities capital improvement projects with a focus on Duval St., the Greenway Project, and Bayview Park. As City leadership moves forward with the plan, many residents believe the arts, youth and families, and environmentally friendly efforts should be in integrated in all initiatives to the extent possible. While there are substantial and even overwhelming challenges ahead, the 2021 Community Survey offers a solid starting place, and direction on a path to maintain an island that is arguably one of America's most precious assets. 28 The National Research Center and the ICMA produced a survey in 2015 on the livability of Key West. Many of the main concerns in the report are similar to those cited the 2021 Community Survey. 75 117 of 40L2863 KEY WEST T A,4A 3��� ;; III. Distribution . d Demographics Survey Totals The January 2021 Community Survey resulted in the most prolific community input local government has received in recent history.29 A total of 3,776 Key West residents completed the questionnaire: 3,048 adults took the electronic version; 26 adults completed a hard copy version; and 702 students from Key West High School completed a similar survey on-line. With a population of approximately 25,000, the percentage rate of completion is 14.8% with a 1.47 margin of error. (An average of 10% response rate is generally considered statistically significant).30 From these numbers, it is reasonable to assume that the data is credible and representative of the community at large. Survey Distribution The goal of the survey was to reach a broad and diverse range of community members. Collection methods included: • An online survey translated into Spanish, Creole, French and Russian • Social media postings • Business and civic organization e-newsletters (Chamber, Business Guild, SHRM, Etc) • Advertisements in local newspapers • PSAs on local radio stations • A post and link on the City of Key West Website • The Key West School system • Public entities email lists (Keys Energy, FKAA, FKCC) • The Arts Community • Social Service Organizations and Non profits 29 In 2015,the NCS conducted a "Community Livability Report"for Key West with data from 376 respondents so See http://www.tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/ 76 118 of 40L2864 KEY WEST 4 A,AA I%" Plu)r • Religious Leaders/IMA (to share with their congregations) • Mailings to residents in Bahama Village • Flyers to all residents living in dwellings managed by the KWHA • Verbal interviews with people who are literacy challenged (in Creole), and more. Household Data on Survey Respondents The majority of respondents, (65.24%), are between the ages of 35 and 64 years old, and are married or partnered. A smaller number of respondents, (23.82%), have children under the age of 17 living in the home. Most respondents live within the City limits of Key West, (80.91%), with an almost even split between residential property owners and renters. Approximately half of respondents have called Key West home for more than 16 years, (47.78%). 77 119 of 40L2865 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; Pli)r Personal Demographic Data from the Survey r11 PA Cd IIIQ:At age derllllogrQ r,)IIIIIW.. Q:Aire you.? 3 44 1 % 45-54 '21, 17'% �m-6 4 20, % 65+ 20.m2% d;YAD nGI&An 2d;&Ab 301k "D MA"ry PIGIAAD 6d;7 AD 7d;&bsP 8GIVr 9D; Ib nd;&d;&bsp Do ya":)u Ihave dwniilldirein undeir 17 ii1/Iing ya":)uir Iwna":)us6wna":)II fil Yes 23.82°/n(719) No 76.18%(2300) 78 120 of 40L2866 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; Poi \ h a II s y c)a Ir Ir1C"a aIr II &:ro a 't a't u s.l 8 GI?Acr 'dk?" 7 %, sir9i,gle 114"arrle�d clwr Sej,:D,ara'tl'ecl c.wr WIc'lcwwe1!1 Partnered Divorced For Ihow Irna my years Ihave you IIIIved Ihn IKey \(/es ." m 2% U 5,8% 201RAc� GI AD Less than a 5 yeal'�s o= nG year 9 11 5 yeaar5 More thif-ari a6 ,ear year's 79 121 of 40L2867 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; Poi o YOU own or rent YOUr res dei ce Gn the Oty Jirnfts of IlKoyWest? clom�'t live within tlhe City Liimiit,s of Key Wiest: Dent 2,.05%( 69) 1 .20/6(58 1 is J Ow mi 48.66,%,(14"71) o YOU Iplain to Iloavo IlKoy West Gn the next 5 year? Ye If Yes}w hi ? .fd1%(230) 1, .10% Undecided 21.51%(65 ) No 7.78%(11746) 80 122 of 40L2868 KEY WEST HIPAM 4 A AA 5 ;; Plu)r Professional Data on Survey Respondents The majority of respondents, (81.4%), work within the City Limits of Key West. Professions run the gamut, with no single profession emerging as most prevalent. The "other" category includes freelance artists, self-employed individuals, social workers, and others. The average income of respondents is largely, (80.59%), above $55,000 annually per household, and most individuals are paid annually as opposed to hourly. (See charts below). Summary Community members who participated in the survey provide a credible snapshot of the Key West Community at large. The response rate is statistically significant; the diverse outreach resulted in comprehensive input from many diverse groups in our community. 81 123 of 40L2869 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; Pli)r Professional Demographic Data from the Survey \Mhat iiirndustir\r Ibest de&ciriibes \rouir.work.? Hospitali �.Re i r`1 au-at � � ��� I�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� m IRetail 4,4MID G o v er ri rn en tim 9 97 E d r r c at i cX r 13 91'/D, Privat BU it ess ancl,,,, �0,40'��� IEntertainmei4l �NT1Lr5iciarri„„i/ „ Iu6 ItreadD�rcl�o„t m"I,0 Work Tc�uri 4,'�'2'��'� r act i11 Other i 'r 40' s I a c fi 'ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff e GRAD n r".ID/D 2d;&d?6 3015/ry 4 d;&'i?6 'E d;&'i?6 6 d;&'i?6 7015 cy F,G1D/D 9 GID/D '"n u".&GIRAOI 82 124 of 40L2870 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What �S YOUir hOUsehold's average total �incoirne before taxes? Less y!5,d�0Jllllllllllllllllllll 4,2 25,GGG m51 51% 5 o,d;&a& sgq,d:oo 3� m5 $ 49YdxdaG 1P II N.IyNJ GO cX r e.� 25,33'�i ' GI&Ab Ild;&% 20'& cy 301& r 40?6 5d;RID G:ad;&% 70 ACa zad IRAD 9q".RAD .IlGd;&?6 83 125 of 40L2871 KEY WEST II . Major Issues of Concern Respondents housing, (s. and sea level rise 7w)PFo were road and sidewalk repair (ax wx) .na .n.i,anm.n„i o.o<.aian i30.35xi KEY WEST HIPAM 4 A AA I"I Plu)r III III III. IMajor Planned Projects Respondents were asked to identify the top three projects planned or underway that are most important to them. The projects include major capital improvement initiatives that have already been planned. Stormwater and sewer combined received the most support, (68.34%and 34.36%), followed by Pavement Management. For bricks and mortar projects, the priorities were Duval St. Revitalization, (30.94%), the Greenway Project (23.80%) and Bayview Park (15.47%). °L'IVRI St111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�� 0,"9,4:G 4j,"40 GA II P"raIIIagern&I-Ii Ba y v i e^w Park k 15,470% QI 114allcIy SgLNar 0%. Reviitalizatio , Bali A171,A V"ill,al. III E.xrenai"Im" u we-errway 2,3-," 0%, Wo Project Aclrnir;als rUuit m i 20% The Triangle l`3-"G95GA Stc-rrn Ild,,ti�e,iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillm= 68.W 0/6 Sewer 34,"36% O'r h er(P l r a M.m9%. l yrr,;n, �.p'yrr�Ye 2 lY% 31D'R4c. 4 GID4e 1�OR''r,. 6 d'R'Ye ;r YCA o- 8 8yrR"D 9&➢4'r l d'ktl:YIr+Yr. 85 127 of 40L2873 KEY WEST y A AA 3 ;; Plu)r IV. City Services and Amenities The majority of respondents believe that the quality of life is excellent or good in Key West, (20.13% excellent; 55.31% good.) The following chart shows the rankings and combined percentage scores of excellent and good ratings for each service or issue in this section of the survey. It should be noted that the majority of respondents (66.08%) are in favor of closing parts of Duval St. for pedestrian traffic on evenings and/or weekends. Rank Service/Issue Percentage of Excellent Percentage of Excellent and Good Rating from and Good Rating from Respondents Respondents (above 50%) (ll qfllo '!' 0%) . Safety 87A 3 D11veirs y 821 6 e".YsIIIrk•z C., �� D u1/a St. at d Q;"":ro II g Irk a't Q;"d 't II Ir'n Q;"&:ro 6 Custoir7C er°':eirvlice firoirn Oty 6235 3 Oty uW.eadeIrsIwn p 546 0 Cornrnuinlcabon frorn 1lity 48A 10 1 II e a in II li in e r"r" 41.3 11 &dewalllks and Street 1 nrflfions 35.95 12 Code II!of rcern nt 33.01 13 ppea�� I of IC: mown/IDuuuwrall Sty 31.39 14 aIIIrness of II ees (taxer, uuutullob es) 3130 1"' ::ffortr"t Il lr a te II:co If uuulrlir urn 30.11 10 11,a hfii; ow 29 21 17 a 11,ll<li In 4 J.4,61. 18 Aff rdabl le �...Il uuur"ing 3.00 Public Transportation31 31 The data suggests that most respondents,(and most residents),do not utilize public transportation,as indicated by responding with"I don't know"on questions regarding bus routes and fares(54.07%and 60.75%respectively). 86 128 of 40L2874 KEY WEST Data on Services and amenities What iS YOUr overall feelling of personal safety in �Key West? '- " 'Illllllllllllllllllllllll- 5,2.570/6 Don't kncffl - 38.411/6 . ,uuuuuuuuuuu—uuomuuu , . KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v Drat li YOUir overall Ire "bing Of CUStOirnelr seiry ce YOU have Irecel ed "firorn Cfty olrriployees? Gc c,cl 44,64 pc»o1 6 C37% D c»rri't K rri r.,w j 9, 7'% GIk Ab Ild;&% 20'k cy 301k r 401n6 501R"r rad,&% 70 Acd �.a IRAD 9q".RAD .IlGd;IR6 re des"�" as m I�r,� "�, lip�ra�u�lr overalloverallI "�,Iirrl�� of"�,I�r,o "�'� lilrrr,o of"�,I�r,o fees. a�lr�°li"�,�r olr�li�om� "�,� o I��� IrII�IIrrI�� u�"�,IIIIII"�,Ilo -? Don't Kni Excellent .48%,(158 _ 4.93 o(14;2) Prr iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii/ 24,73 ��'�13� 21 .57%(78 j Fair 38.29%(11 4) 89 131 of 40L2877 KEY WEST HIPAM I A AA I V oirw v What �S YOUir'overall rabing Of OUir'coirnirmAirifty's openness towards people of d�veirse backgroUnds? 40 85,116 G o c�cl 41.75,11D Fair I 05,'YD ........... p C)C)I. ............ 4 0 R/D Do ri't K ri c�vi �2 3 5% 11 G%, 2G'�16 301�Acl 4 5 GIR/cl 6 G% TNAc, KI�Ab 9rNAC, W h a t S YO U ir'ove ra I I rabing of ain effort to close pairts of DUval St. for pedestiriain traffic on eveirl�irlgs and/oir weekends? 32 4�2% G c!,c,cl 3:1 66% Fair 15 09% p o o 1, 5,54%G 5,29%, GRAD 110% 201RAcy 301RACP 4 GIR6 5 GRID 6 0% 70�4cd KIRAD 9GRAD IGGIR6 90 132 of 40L 2878 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What li YOUr overall rabing of the firegUency of the IbU orvGce liirl IlKeyWest? Excel1 n 5,93 G c"c'X c'l '20,9'7'% Fair 1"m,90Iya Pc»cxl m4 GIkAb IlG'`n"c 2G'n16 301k cl 4tl 9"r, 5GIR"r, 6dJ% TNAc �.atl IkAb 9rNAC Iltl tl ia9r, What li YOUr overall rabing of the IbU fro liirl IlKeyWest? Gc"c'Xcl ' 0, 0;% Fair ikl`b°°i"D "11 i;&% 2GIRAco- 301RArr. 4i;&'�9"cv 5i;&'R/D 60% T;&Acv 8Q imAD 9q".1RAD "lGi;&'`ID 91 133 of 40L2879 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What IIS YOUir overall Iraq"bing of efforts to attract ra ct moire eco-"firiend ly tOUiri,,.;t to KeyWest? ExcofI n B.4.3'% Fair 2 ,04% F�c»cXr �j/ 22 4 �4 tlk " IlG'`n"c 2G'n16 301k "r =4 5GIR"c 6G% TNAr, KIaAb 9q"NAC IItlJtl�ia9"r, What li YOUr overall II rah"bing of the Cfty's lea deer hlip? Ead'c �� nr 16 BM06 Fair. 223 24% F c»cXr ` j m34z D rri"t Krric��vi 4 46'D% ikl`b°°i"D "11 i;&% 2GIRAco- 301`nACP 4i;&'?Ica 5i;&'R/D p,:;i;&'% T;&'`nA"ra 8i;&iaAD 901RAD "lGi;&'?ID 92 134 of 40L2880 KEY WEST and �in�babves? vuuuuum- ,, ,a Ex�c . ,uuuuuuuuuuuu- ,, , ,. KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What li YOUr overall rah"bing of the pa irks lilrl IKey West? Don't ar Excellent 2.34 ' ) Per / Fait 31.97 '6 ,GoGd 49.1176(1426) What IIS YOUir'overall Ir'a "b ing of the cleanhiness Of Ipdbllllc spaces Ilin IKey West? (streets, pa rlk , lip tc.,) Don't lam Excellent 01.24"� .6 � (1633) P' ir .� 1"7.20%(499) IGood„ �.. 36.68%(1122) Fa ii it 3 .26%(1110) 94 136 of 40L2882 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What li YOUr overall rah"bing of lHe alllk and street irnaHinteinaince lien IKey West? Don't Knlcvw ExceElemt . T9 4.,35%(125) PoCYM° ""•� w 1GOGd ...................... 31,1 %(90 Fair 4 .,,86,%(11 3) What liS YOUr overall Ir'a "b ing of the aesthefts of the dowintowin/IMAva ll St. a lr'oa ? Don" xcellemt Poor / 25.79%(740) ,; GoGd 2 .52%(327) Fair 95 137 of 40L2883 KEY WEST A AA 5 ;; oirw v What li YOUr overall II ra V ing of the tiraffic flow liirl IlKoyWest? Don't Knicvw, Excellent P or / 6.91%(761) `,/ lGcKyd 27. 4%(784) Fa it r 44,4 '%(1 89) What IIS YOUr overall Ir'a "bing of Ipa rHing a va lHa lblllIfty Ilin Old Town IlKoyWest? Don't.Kniow Excellent 1.817 a(64) 1.18%( ) 13.43 ,(388) j i Per 5 .�90%(14171) ' � 3 .�63 o( 3) 96 138 of 40L2884 KEY WEST 4 A,4A 3��� ;; What Gs YOUr overall ire bing o.I:.the avaIiIab6Ihty of affordable IhOUsGirrlg in IlKey lest Don't E El t '7'.90" - - j mew Faiir 7.74%,(1963) V. Narrative Q uestions in the Survey The survey included three narrative questions to allow for open-ended response from respondents. (The full list of comments can be accessed by contacting the consultant.) The information below encompasses the most common answers from respondents to each question. I.. \(ylwnat as a" Iiing Oty Leade ip .,uty Manager, Mayor, .,uty Cairrir a T T a& ie c& u & to better serve a.::Wuir coirnirn uir Ii y.? A total of 1,499 respondents answered this question. Six themes emerged from the narrative data. They are listed below from high to low in order of the number of times they were mentioned: 1. Communication: This issue was by far the most commonly cited in the narrative. The answers covered three general areas: 1) Creating more forums to listen to the community, including surveys and meetings to gather community input; 2) sharing information with the community about happenings and decisions; and, 3) visibility in terms of attending community events to engage with community members. 2. Affordable Housing: Recommendations covered two primary areas: 1) Creating more affordable housing opportunities; and, 2) controlling transient rentals. 97 139 of 40L2885 KEY WEST T A,4A 3��� ;; 3. Tourism: Many of these comments focused on limiting tourists, paying more attention to the needs of residents than visitors, and placing more of an emphasis on eco-tourism to protect the island's resources. 4. Sea Level Rise and Environment: These comments focused being more proactive on adaptation efforts; and promoting more eco-friendly practices on the island. 5. Youth and Family: There was a heavy emphasis placed on providing more opportunities and activities for youth and families (including programming that is not sports related). 6. The Arts:These comments focused on ensuring that the visual and performing arts are central to the City with an emphasis on supporting the arts and integrating the arts into major City initiatives, (E.g., housing, new/rebuilding infrastructure, Etc.) Carnirneints Regarding Businesses and II L,oca I Ecanarny There were many narrative comments on business, but no singular approach emerged. The data for clear direction was therefore inconclusive. For example, while some respondents advocated strongly for City Government to be more involved with business, others vehemently opposed it. Similarly, some individuals wanted City Government to enforce the vote on Cruise Ships, while others wanted them to retract it. It would be advisable as we move forward with the strategic plan for City Leadership to confer with our business organizations (The Chamber, The Business Guild, Mom & Pops, Lodging, Etc.,) to identify specific measures the City can take to support the local economy. The business community should also be well represented when gathering input from residents on specific initiatives. 98 140 of 40L2886 KEY WEST T A,AA 3 ;; Plu)r .. \/Vhat its r:rine tIhiiing Uh e Oty Goverirnirneint of IKey West couIkl do (w&hiin Uh61r poweir) Uhat wouIkl n p irr:rve Uh e q u raw II ty of Iffe for co irn irrw irr ii ty irn e irn Ib e irs A total of 1,466 respondents answered this question. Affordable housing received the most mentions. Six additional topics received many mentions. They are listed below from most to least prevalent: 1. Cleanliness: Respondents mentioned the need for cleaner public spaces (parks and recreational spaces, Duval Street, and streets/sidewalks in general). 2. Street/Road Repair: These comments focused on the need for improvement streets and sidewalks in Old Town and New Town. 3. Traffic:There were many suggestions for curbing traffic by increasing public transportation offerings and by finishing efforts to create more bike lanes in Key West. 4. Parking: Many of the respondents called for the need for more parking availability and free parking for residents. 5. Bike Friendliness: In accordance with the need to stem traffic and congestion, respondents asked for the bike paths to be completed and enhanced. 6. Opportunities for Youth and Families: Respondents echoed sentiments similar to those expressed in the previous question, focusing on the need for opportunities, activities, and programming for families and youth. Specific Mention firarn theHaitian C r ur ui ui Many of the surveys distributed within the Haitian community were completed with the help of a translator in hard copy form. The results were similar in terms of priorities, but they added one point in the narrative questions: The need for ESL classes to help them better integrate into the community. 99 141 of 40L2887 KEY WEST Plu)r 3. \Mhat assues have we not a ed you about un tIhn s s uirve t[mt you Ie6 Oty .s.. . needs to addiress? A total of 1,106 respondents answered this question. There were many suggestions that had already been brought up in the survey, and are therefore not listed below (E.g., affordable housing, cleanliness, traffic, Etc.,) The most prevalent comment from respondents to this question was that the survey left out the arts. There were many suggestions that the future of the City planning should include and engage the visual and performing arts. Additional topics that received multiple mentions, and were not featured in the survey, include: Improving dog parks Improving education More COVID vaccinations Larger street signage Better street lighting More attention to diversity and equality Stop panhandling Promote more recycling Increase trash pick up (twice per week) Get rid of T-shirt shops on Make sure the Cruise Ships Allow the Cruise ships to Duval St. don't come back come back Stop favoritism from City Improve hurricane Improve access to health Leaders preparedness care Offer more mental health Curb TDC efforts (we need Stop airport expansion services fewer tourists) Ban leaf blowers Stop cutting down trees 100 142 of 40L2888 KEY WEST A AA 3 ;; Plu)r VIII. lResults from thelKey WestlHigh School Survey A total of 702 from 1,235 students at Key West High School, (KWHS), responded to the survey. The student survey largely mirrored the version for the general community. Several questions were omitted, as they would not be relevant to the age demographic, (E.g., parking, and code enforcement). Major Projects were described in more detail. There was an almost even breakdown in the grade level of respondents, with the largest numbers represented by the Sophomore class. Major Issues of Concern lea Level 44.,94 fo Rising:F.isi... iAf fordable. 62„3.3% Htwausing:H'av— Helpingtthe ss 1"i ° Homele He�lirrurg rlmr " IIIIIII EWerty Prtt:matting 12.3.61"r`a Eco-Tr.Uri rn:—� Helpi:n- 24.54% g , Ei,isinesse.;z: . H'.ra.+,ring I'rllttrre �,,yr°r"n Space.,for— Keernng ruiu 2'1. 1 a Streets '4ore FPi,uLA ;�,�4 Attu Ti an Mari.. A Poor Per,estrianCF"., '"� a" "it"erre off farlit e gs N Rking ' 5.456% icn1:31oveM ell ttS... Other Irlea irecir ;9 68°rn 101 143 of 40L2889 KEY WEST 4 A,4A IV Major Planned Projects As with the Community Survey, sewers, stormwater and roads/pavement management ranked high amongst students. Youth placed far more of an emphasis on the Homeless Shelter than the adult community (52.41%for youth and 13.98%for adults.) For bricks and mortar projects, after KOTS, the top priorities were the same in both surveys: 1) Duval St.; 2) The Greenway Project; and. 3) Bayview Park. The co el s 9241 Iet� Road Imhroverm enFs— Pay vie,x Park: 0 00'% Redesigning ",yl c'�r tah atir.,.� % m 4 a Re 16 Bahama'Vill g; D 05✓D rn Exj,msIon:""" G r e^e rn W aye ..k�r umiii uuu �III mllim um 2 0.7 3'% Project,""" ask r n 53 Th�e Ewen a nee 14,.O�N� tc,Ke�y Dourglass G y rn E x.II:P,a n s I CIw 1`11:""" Flaking the o... c,r rare"ag ��M Di a�i rn a��,-. 44,5 3',�� Water and sevier systern— (lobs""r Fk/b !I:% (lobs"r 48J% 5D% r.'aBJ% 7FPs""r, FPMs""r, 9M/b Itl:k(P/b. 102 144 of 40L2890 KEY WEST H11M T A,AA 5 ;; oirw V The Narrative An average of 480 students responded to the narrative questions in the survey, (the same questions as in the general Community Survey.) The narrative from students was similar to the adult respondents, (affordable housing, cleaner streets, Etc.,) but there was much more of a emphasis e i the homeless and peoplei ve . The most common needcited was for more programming, activities and places for youth. Below is a sample of the narrative responses. "'There is a large population of kids in Key West with nothing to do after school, no Furl activities or the weekends. I believe that because our city locks these things people turn to other things. "i really life these surveys, i feel that having more input from the community can help leaders make better and decisions that citizens feel are beneficial to Key West."" "Listen to the people and fund projects or organizations that actually matter. on' just spend all the city's money on courthouses or government buildings or roads. Spend it on people that actually need it and something that doesn't just help the "appeal"of Key West to attract more tourists, it's quite clear that we have enough tourism each and every year with the things that we already, currently have to offer." "'O ne suggestion is to create or improve a center or teen recreation. Maybe a place that promotes healthy physical activity f iike a community center with a weight room or basket bell court), or somewhere that offers help with getting involved in community volunteering (Gs volunteering is a great way to get involved in the community and can be educational), or a Place: that facilitates socializing (for example, an arcade, bowling alley, or selection of shops/cafes that the youth and adults would enjoy alike)." i. ar twww.jr rre ��wrt this,vwr�et. the tw'wwt � wirwrww�rw the w�' wre w� het lert w� very i L .w.w �'wr kw�r�t,�.'�rr;w�t,�^ ,"� i III. Conclusion In Key West, even as we continue to endure COVID 19, many community members are acutely aware of our good fortune to be a part of"one human family." Residents still refer to the island by its alter-ego, "Paradise,"for both its aesthetic beauty and effervescent community spirit. For most 103 145 of 40L2891 KEY WEST residents, the benefits of being in such a precious place outweigh the high cost of living, pending hurricanes, and a lack of access to the "real world. Despite our good fortune, our City Leadership must keep their finger on the pulse of the community to know the needs, and understand how residents think and feel about living here. We don't do that very often. Prior to the 2021, the last time the community was polled was in 2015, with a Citizen Survey conducted by The National Research Center. A relatively small sum of 376 respondents were polled. Though the sample size was not statistically relevant, the snapshot of results in 2015 were similar to those in the 2021 survey, in which 3,776 citizens participated. (As an example, the percentage of respondents who gave affordable housing a rating of "excellent" or "good" was 6% in 2015 and 7.08% in 2021.) Residents were frustrated then, and still are now with traffic, parking, cleanliness and pavement/street management. Some things, however, have changed. In 2015, sea level rise was apparent, but not on the minds of most residents. The topic did not appear on the 2015 survey, and was not addressed in any of the report narrative. Yet sea level rise emerged as the number two priority in the 2021 survey. The comparison of the 2015 and 2021 surveys leads to two definitive conclusions: First, the community has not made great strides on key areas of concern, and second, we now have a "new" issue to add to the pile with sea level rise. In fairness, these challenges aren't solved in six years, and sometimes not even in decades. Yet we are reminded when we see the repetition of old challenges, and the presentation of new ones, that we must continue to ask the questions, and use the information to refocus and refine our work; to make a plan for which we hold ourselves accountable; and to take measured steps towards solutions that will preserve and protect our "island paradise" and "one human family" now and for generations to come. 104 146 of 40L2892 m ICEV CONNECTIONS i i / / I' I lrr r r r/ l 0 F �� ��, ��°� o-d��✓,gyp. 'ST f�� 2893 City of Key West IffyCqNNfCTPoNS Transit Development Plan Major Update 2020-2029 Draft Report July 2019 Prepared for Prepared by Tiiiinddle I Oliver IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS IFA B IL....III,,,,,, ()IC,,,,,° C()14 F III,,,,,,III,,,,IFS Section1,Introduction.....................................................................................................1-1 Objectivesof this Plan...........................................................................................................................1-1 TDPChecklist.........................................................................................................................................1-2 Organizationof Report..........................................................................................................................1-3 Section2,Baseline Conditions ..........................................................................................2-1 Physical Description of Study Area.......................................................................................................2-1 PopulationProfile.................................................................................................................................2-3 Population and Employment Densities...............................................................................................2-4 Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Trends.................................................................................2-8 Travel Behavior and Commuting Trends...........................................................................................2-17 Major Activity Centers and Trip Generators.......................................................................................2-21 Major Developments&Activity...........................................................................................................2-22 Touristand Visitor Levels....................................................................................................................2-22 Weather...............................................................................................................................................2-25 Roadway and Traffic Conditions........................................................................................................2-26 Current and Future Land Use and Densities......................................................................................2-26 Section ,Existing Services Evaluation ..............................................................................3-1 Overview Existing Transit Services.......................................................................................................3-1 Inventory of Other Transportation Providers......................................................................................3-7 TrendAnalysis.....................................................................................................................................3-11 PeerReview Analysis...........................................................................................................................3-13 Section4,Public Involvement...........................................................................................4-1 Public Involvement Techniques...........................................................................................................4-1 Summary of Key West Transit Public Involvement Activities..............................................................4-2 ProjectReview Meetings.......................................................................................................................4-3 StakeholderInterviews.........................................................................................................................4-3 Rider and Non-Rider Surveys................................................................................................................4-6 Phase I Outreach Public Workshops...................................................................................................4-22 DiscussionGroup Workshops.............................................................................................................4-24 City Commission Visioning Workshop................................................................................................4-26 BusOperator Interviews.....................................................................................................................4-28 Phase 11 Outreach Public Workshops .................................................................................................4-29 TransitNeeds Survey..........................................................................................................................4-30 OtherOutreach Activities....................................................................................................................4-32 Section ,Situation Appraisal...........................................................................................5-1 Reviewof Puns and Studies.................................................................................................................5-1 SituationAppraisal................................................................................................................................5-6 SectionS,Goals and Objectives.........................................................................................6-1 Goalsand Objectives.............................................................................................................................6-1 Section7,Transit Demand Assessment..............................................................................7-1 TransitMarket Assessment...................................................................................................................7-1 ForecastRidership Analysis..................................................................................................................7-7 Section8,Alternatives Development and Evaluation...........................................................8-1 Developmentof Transit Needs.............................................................................................................8-1 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report i 149 of 40L2895 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS 10-Year Needs Plan ...............................................................................................................................8-2 ServiceNeeds........................................................................................................................................8-2 Capita[/Infrastructure/Technoiogy Needs...........................................................................................8-4 Poiicy/Other Needs...............................................................................................................................8-4 Evacuationof Alternatives.....................................................................................................................8-6 Alternatives Evaluation Results Summary.........................................................................................8-10 Section9 10-Year Transit Plan..........................................................................................9-1 ServiceImprovements..........................................................................................................................9-1 Capita[/Infrastructure/Technocogy Needs...........................................................................................9-2 Pocicy/Other Needs...............................................................................................................................9-3 10-Year Financial Plan...........................................................................................................................9-3 10-Year TDP Implementation Plan.......................................................................................................9-8 Section10:w Plan Implementation and Coordination...........................................................10-1 PostAdoption Recommendations.....................................................................................................10-1 Continued Marketing/Outreach..........................................................................................................10-1 Role of Key Connections Executive Summary.....................................................................................10-1 Building on TDP Efforts/Recationships...............................................................................................10-2 Plan Coordination/Integration...........................................................................................................10-2 Impcementation/Action Plan..............................................................................................................10-2 AppendixA: Peer and Trend Figures.................................................................................A-1 AppendixB: Farebox Report............................................................................................B-1 AppendixC: Public Involvement Materials........................................................................C-1 AppendixD: Performance Monitoring Report....................................................................D-1 Performance Monitoring Program .....................................................................................................D-2 Ill.....ii t of Ilkiguir Figure 2-1:Age Distribution, Key West,2016............................................................................................2-4 Figure 2-2: Employment by Occupation, Key West,2016........................................................................2-8 Figure 2-3: Income Distribution, Key West,2016.....................................................................................2-9 Figure 2-4: Languages Spoken, Key West,2016.....................................................................................2-12 Figure 2-5:TD Population and Trips Trend,2013-2017.........................................................................2-13 Figure 2-6: Educational Attainment, Key West,2016.............................................................................2-13 Figure 2-7: Locations of Jobs Paying Less than $15,000 Annually, Key West.......................................2-16 Figure 2-8: Key West Commuter Outflows..............................................................................................2-20 Figure 2-9: Key West Commuter Inflows................................................................................................2-21 Figure 2-10:Truman Waterfront Park Concept Plan .............................................................................2-23 Figure 2-12:Truman Waterfront Park Duval Loop bus stop access......................................................2-23 Figure 2-11:Truman Waterfront Park Amphitheater.............................................................................2-23 Figure 2-13: Foreign Tourists, Key West,2008-2016..............................................................................2-24 Figure 2-14:Top 5 Origins of Foreign Tourists, Key West,2016.............................................................2-24 Figure 2-15: Hotel Occupancy Rates, Key West,2008-2018..................................................................2-25 Figure 2-16: Key West 2030 Future Land Use Map .................................................................................2-27 Figure3-1: Duval Loop..............................................................................................................................3-4 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 150 of 40L2896 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Figure 3-2: Key West Transit Ridership Trends ........................................................................................3-7 Figure 4-1: Public Involvement Techniques.............................................................................................4-1 Figure4-2: Purpose of Trip........................................................................................................................4-8 Figure 4-3: Method for Reaching Bus........................................................................................................4-8 Figure 4-4:Transfers by Survey Respondents..........................................................................................4-9 Figure 4-5: Number of Trips per Week......................................................................................................4-9 Figure 4-6: Reason for Riding Bus ..........................................................................................................4-10 Figure 4-7: Length Using Key West Transit.............................................................................................4-10 Figure4-8: Fare........................................................................................................................................4-11 Figure 4-9: Method of Receiving Information.........................................................................................4-11 Figure 4-10:Top Three Service Suggestions..........................................................................................4-12 Figure 4-11:Satisfaction with Key West Transit.....................................................................................4-12 Figure4-12: Residency............................................................................................................................4-13 Figure 4-13: Household Income..............................................................................................................4-13 Figure4-14: Race.....................................................................................................................................4-14 Figure4-15:Gender and Age...................................................................................................................4-14 Figure 4-16: How much awareness is there in the city about transit/public transportation?.............4-15 Figure 4-17:What do you think of Key West Transit service?................................................................4-16 Figure 4-18:What is your perception of transit's role in the city?.........................................................4-16 Figure 4-19: Is traffic congestion a problem in Key West? What role do you see transit playing alleviatingthe situation?........................................................................................................................4-17 Figure 4-20: Have you used Key West Transit?.......................................................................................4-17 Figure 4-21: Have you used any of the following other services in Key West?......................................4-18 Figure 4-22: Do you think there is a need for additional transit services in Key West?........................4-18 Figure 4-23:What are the top three improvements you would most like to see?................................4-19 Figure 4-24: How many months of the year do you reside in Key West/Lower Keys?..........................4-19 Figure 4-25: If a permanent resident,where do you live?......................................................................4-20 Figure 4-26:Age.......................................................................................................................................4-20 Figure 4-27: Household Income..............................................................................................................4-21 Figure 4-28:What do you think is a reasonable one-way fare to pay for transit?................................4-21 Figure 4-29: Importance of Service Aspects...........................................................................................4-22 Figure 4-30:What service improvements would make KWT better for you to use?.............................4-23 Figure 4-31:What three service improvements would make KWT better for you to use?...................4-23 Figure 4-32: Policy Questions on Vision .................................................................................................4-27 Figure 4-33: Policy Questions on Innovation .........................................................................................4-28 Figure 4-34: Policy Questions on Partnerships&Funding....................................................................4-28 Figure 4-35:Top Service Improvements ................................................................................................4-31 Figure 4-36:Top Capital/Technology Improvements............................................................................4-31 Figure 9-1:Annual Operating and Capital Costs (millions) .....................................................................9-5 Figure 9-2:Costs and Revenues (millions) ...............................................................................................9-6 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 151 of 40L2897 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Ill.....ii t of Maps Map2-1:Study Area ..................................................................................................................................2-2 Map 2-2: Older Aduit Population (Age 65+), Key West,2016...................................................................2-5 Map 2-3: Population, Key West,2016.......................................................................................................2-6 Map 2-4: Employment, Key West,2016 ....................................................................................................2-7 Map 2-5: LEP Households, Key West,2016.............................................................................................2-11 Map 2-6: Below Poverty Level, Key West,2016......................................................................................2-15 Map 2-7:Zero-Vehicie Households, Key West,2016 ..............................................................................2-19 Map3-1: Existing Route Service................................................................................................................3-3 Map 7-1: 2017 DTA with Existing Network................................................................................................7-4 Map 7-2: 2016 TO1 with Existing Network.................................................................................................7-6 Map 8-1: Key West Transit 10-Year Transit Needs....................................................................................8-5 I....ist of-ralbllBS Table1-1:TDP Checklist...........................................................................................................................1-2 Table 2-1: Population Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016..................................................................2-3 Table 2-2: Population and Trends, Key West,2000-2016........................................................................2-3 Table 2-3: Demographic Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016............................................................2-10 Table 2-4:TD Population and Trips Trend,2013-2017..........................................................................2-12 Table 2-5: Poverty, Key West,2000-2016...............................................................................................2-14 Table 2-6: Profile of Employees Earning$15,000 or Less Annually, Key West,2015............................2-16 Table 2-7:Journey-to-Work Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016......................................................2-17 Table 2-8:Vehicle Availability, Key West,2010 and 2016......................................................................2-18 Table 2-9:Commuter Outflows, Key West,2015....................................................................................2-18 Table 2-10:Commuter Inflows, Key West,2015.....................................................................................2-20 Table 2-11: Major Employers, Key West.................................................................................................2-22 Table 2-12: Foreign Tourists, Key West,2008-2016...............................................................................2-23 Table 2-13:Congested Roadways, Key West..........................................................................................2-26 Table 3-1: Key West Transit Service Summary.........................................................................................3-2 Table 3-2: Key West Transit Vehicle Inventory.........................................................................................3-6 Table 3-3: KWT Current Fare Structure ....................................................................................................3-7 Table 3-4:Other Transportation Providers- Key West...........................................................................3-8 Table 3-5:Other Transportation Providers- Key West(cont'd) .............................................................3-9 Table 3-6: Key West Fixed-Route Trend Analysis,2014-2018................................................................3-14 Table 3-7:Selected Peer Systems for Key West Transit Peer Review Analysis.....................................3-16 Table 3-8: Key West Transit Fixed-Route Peer Review Analysis,2017..................................................3-17 Table 4-1:TDP Public Involvement Summary.........................................................................................4-2 Table 4-2:Stakeholder Information.........................................................................................................4-3 Table5-1: Local Plans, Policies, and Programs.......................................................................................5-3 Table 5-2: Regional Plans, Policies, and Programs..................................................................................5-4 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report iv 152 of 40L2898 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Table 5-3:State and Federal Plans, Policies, and Programs...................................................................5-5 Table 7-1:Transit Service Density Thresholds.........................................................................................7-2 Table7-2:TO1 Variables............................................................................................................................7-5 Table 7-3:Total Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029*........7-10 Table 7-4:Weekday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* .7-10 Table 7-5:Saturday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* .7-11 Table 7-6:Sunday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029*....7-11 Table 8-1:Alternative Evaluation Measures.............................................................................................8-7 Table 8-2:Alternatives Evaluation-Scoring Thresholds........................................................................8-9 Table 8-3: 10-YearTransit Service Alternatives Ranking.......................................................................8-10 Table 9-1: 10-YearTransit Plan Service Characteristics..........................................................................9-1 Table 9-2:Vehicle Replacement Plan.......................................................................................................9-4 Table 9-3: 10-Year Financial Plan .............................................................................................................9-7 Table 9-4: 10-Year Implementation Plan and Unfunded Needs..............................................................9-8 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report v 153 of 40L2899 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Section, 1 : Introduc6bn The Key West City Commission currently provides public transportation through the Key West Department of Transportation (KWDoT), also known as Key West Transit(KWT),which consists of iocai and regional fixed-route bus services in the city and connects it to the Lower Keys with service to Marathon. KWT initiated this study in coordination with the City of Key West to update the City's Transit Development Nan (TDP).Accordingto Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) We 14-73.001 - Public Transportation, "The TDP shall be the applicant's planning,development and operational guidance document to be used in developing the Transportation Improvement Program and the Department's Five Year Work Program."The TDP serves as the strategic guide for public transportation in the city during the next 10 years and represents the transit agency's vision for public transportation in its service area duringthis period. The main objective of this study is to develop a TDP major update for KWT services in Key West,as currently required by State law. Upon completion,this TDP major update, referred to as Key Connections:APlan for Transit, will result in a 10-year plan for transit and mobility needs,cost and revenue projections, and community transit goals,objectives, and policies. TIP If eq� ,J re rn e n t s As a recipient of state Public Transit Block Grant funds,the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requires a major update of the KWT TDP every five years to ensure that the provision of public transportation is consistent with the mobility needs of local communities.The FDOT formally adopted the current requirements for TDPs on February 20,2007. Major requirements of the regulation include the following: • Major updates must be completed every 5 years,covering a 10-year planning horizon. • A Public Involvement Plan (PIP) must be developed and approved by FDOT or consistent with the approved Metropolitan Punning Organization (MPO) public participation plan. • FDOT,the Regional Workforce Development Board,and the MPO must be advised of all public meetings at which the TDP is presented and discussed, and these entities must be given the opportunity to review and comment on the TDP during the development of the mission,goals, objectives,alternatives,and 10-year implementation program. • Estimation of the community's demand for transit service (10-year annual projections) using the planning tools provided by FDOT or a demand estimation technique approved by FDOT. The Florida Legislature added an additional requirement for the TDP in 2007 with the adoption of House Bill 985.This legislation amended Florida Statutes(F.S.) 341.071, requiring transit agencies to City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 1-1 154 of 40L2900 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS "... specificaiiy address potential enhancements to productivity and performance which wouid have the effect of increasing farebox recovery ratio." FDOT subsequentiy issued guidance requiring the TDP and each annuai update to inciude a 1-2-page summary report as an appendix to the major or annuai TDP report on the farebox recovery ratio and strategies impiemented and pianned to improve it. L..II'. II::) Ch C II, H t This TDP Update meets the requirements for a TDP major update in accordance with Ruie Chapter 14- 73, F.A.C.Tabie 1-1 is a iist of TDP requirements from Ruie 14-73.001 and indicates whether or not the item was accomplished as part of this KWT TDP, as weii as its iocation within this 10-year pian. Table 1-1:TDP Checklist Public Involvement roce Section V Public Involvement Plan(PIP)drafted 4&Appendix C V PIP approved by FDOT 4&Appendix C V TDP includes description of Public Involvement Process 4 V Provide notification to FDOT 4&Appendix C V Provide notification to Regional Workforce Board 4&Appendix C Situation Appraisal V Land use 5 V State and local transportation plans 5 V Other governmental actions and policies 5 V Socioeconomic trends 5 V Organizational issues 5 V Technology 5 V 10-year annual projections of transit ridership using approved model TBEST 7 V Assessment of land uses and urban design patterns that support/hinder transit service provision 5 V Calculate farebox recovery 3&Appendix B Mission and Goals V Provider's vision 6 V Provider's mission 6 V Provider's goals 6 V Provider's objectives 6 Alternative Courses of Action V Develop and evaluate alternative strategies and actions 8 V Benefits and costs of each alternative 8 V Financial alternatives examined 8,9 Implementation ro ra V Ten-year implementation program 9 V Maps indicating areas to be served 8 V Maps indicating types and levels of service 8 V Monitoring program to track performance measures 9&Appendix D V Ten-year financial plan listing operating and capital expenses 9 V Capital acquisition or construction schedule 9 V Anticipated revenues by source 9 Relationship o Other Plans V Consistent with Florida Transportation Plan 5 V Consistent with local government comprehensive plan 5 V Consistent with regional transportation goals and objectives 5 Submission Adopted by Key West City Commissioners TBD Submitted to FDOT TBD City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 1-2 155 of 40L2901 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Section 2 summarizes the Baseline Conditions for the study area for Key West.This inciu des a physical description of the study area,a population profile, and demographic and socioeconomic profiles including transportation ownership,workforce, andjourney-to-work characteristics. It also includes a review of economic conditions and tourism information. Land use trends, major transit trip generators and attractors,existing roadway conditions, major employers, and new developments also are explored.The information compiled and presented in this section provides the basis for more-detailed analysis in subsequenttasks of the TDP. Section 3 summarizes the Existing Services Evaluation for the KWT system.The analysis documents fixed-route services using National Transit Database(NTD) information presenting a detailed examination of operating performance for fixed-route services in the Trend Analysis, and the Peer Review provides an opportunity for Key West to compare its system-wide effectiveness and efficiency indicators with peertransit systems to determine how well transit service in Key West is performing compared to similar transit agencies. Section 4 summarizes the Public Involvement activities undertaken for the TDP.This includes a review of all outreach efforts completed and summaries of key themes and needs discussed as part of each outreach event.The preferences of the community with respect to current and future mobility needs, as served through transit, are reviewed and combined into a robust assessment of how KWT services might be improved during the planning period. Section 5 presents the Situation Appraisal,which reviews the current overall punning and policy environment within the county to better understand transit needs. First,a review of local puns and documents is presented;assessment of these puns helps to identify and evaluate applicable federal and state policies, as well as local community goals and objectives,which relate to transit and mobility.Then,the appraisal examines the strengths and weaknesses of the system, as well as any existing threats to the provision of service in the county and key opportunities for addressing those threats and/or enhancing the transit-friendliness of the operating environment. Included in this section are detailed reviews of existing socioeconomic trends,travel behavior and trends, public involvement, land use,organizational attributes,funding, and technology. Section 6 identifies Goals and Objectives to serve as a policy guide for implementation of the TDP.A review and update of the goals and objectives outlined in the previous TDP major update was completed to match the current goals of the local community with respect to transportation and land use. Section 7 presents the results of a Transit Demand Assessment,summarizing the various demand and mobility needs assessments conducted as part of the TDP.The market assessment includes an examination of potential service gaps and latent demand using the GIS-based Transit Orientation City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 1-3 156 of 40L2902 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Index(T01) and Density Threshold Assessment(DTA) analyses.Assessment techniques for forecasting ridership demand using Transit Boa rdings Estimation and Simulation Tool. are summarized. Section 8 discusses the development of Transit Needs&Priorities,followed by an Alternatives Evaluation process used to assess the identified alternatives,or potential improvements,for the TDP. The identified improvements for KWT services represent the transit needs for the next 10 years and were developed without consideration of funding constraints.The identified service improvements were prioritized using an evaluation process developed to rank and prioritize the transit service alternatives.The resulting ranking of alternatives is used to develop the 10-year implementation plan presented in Section 9. Section 9 summarizes the 10-Year Transit Plan developed for KWT's bus transit service.The Plan shows the recommended service and capital/technology/policy improvements, as well as the unfunded needs. It also includes a discussion of the revenue assumptions and capital and operating costs used.Thereafter,the 10-year phased implementation plan for the TDP is summarized.A set of service,capital/technology, and policy improvements are programed forthe 10-years period and the improvements that may not be funded now but should be considered if additional funding becomes available, are also listed. Section 10 summarizes the techniques and approaches to help make Plan Implementation and Coordination for Key Connections after TDP adoption.This section identifies implementation strategies and ways to make use of the various relationships tools and outreach materials from the TDP process to continue and build support for the implementation of Key Connections. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 1-4 157 of 40L2903 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Section, 2: iibns This section reviews the study area in the context of Key Connections and documents existing baseiine data to gain an understanding of the environment in which the transit system is operating.This information provides the foundation upon which to review trends and forecasting and helps identify areas of opportunity for development of future transit services.The following components were reviewed for consideration: Physical description of study O area N N N City of Key West � iN history N N Ik;$ PaPUlation P'rofhle:.Housing and employment/labor ......................—.....—Ono, densities N n j �Illl�llyJ)fQ�� N N Travel behavior r,„„„„ p �� socra- i and N «. pp ,..«. � demographic N �'�a��/N1/l�lil111V ccsrv�mutingl w characteristics trends N Major actiivity and trends ____________i and trip N generator's j N N N N N N N N N Tourist and Visitor levels; YNeathe' ii mi Roadway and traffic conditions; _ .... Current and future land use .:III i s a� Description of Study hirea Key West is located in the southern portion of Monroe County and is the southernmost city in the continental United States. It has a [and area of 5.59 square miles,and its southern tip is located approximately 90 miles from Cuba.Stock Island is located immediately to the east of Key West;the portion of the island that is north of US-1 is considered part of Key West(excluding Raccoon Key), and the portion south of US-1 is an eponymous Census Designated Puce (CDP) in Monroe County. In addition to Key West,the Florida Keys are divided into three sections: Upper Keys, Middle Keys, and Lower Keys. Map 2-1 provides a physical depiction of the boundaries of Key West,the study area for this TDP. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-1 158 of 40L2904 Ln 0 el r� a d ' p rvd,.Md �i .77 owl, ISM aas mum ��roaoo�o o MENrv,,,,,,���^ ..,.. mum mum mum mom mum mull Fw, 111111111 F CU iwI t!S Y_. mum 0 n p mn �� aun a O1 ¢un n�d��nd DO DO goo s n Deb a� rM�.1 e. ri <v, ti N m If� rvao m r o' WW .. r'✓rvorvor'✓ 0. ap F hi i ��9u�rypii 5, �� ar da� p II����ffff �p4 i 0p, Jim ri? 0aa�loo INN j (CD 00 luuuuuuuu r mN __ ..., j.. ................ wm° titi Ai Gi 40, mry w w� �In o� 0P �rvou� �, alp �r � �4 a , uuuummi = ti sp o,o wrv" Oe 00 iGq' {� m �om�4 0 �����yhtiia�0 0 gum uum uum �i dui °�"° L} 'o^ LO iI i uuuuuuuuu I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIVUIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ,,,,. .::I 16 W a it III II.::I Ir' ffl fie„ pi ,station Trends Population information from the 2000 and the 2010 Census,supplemented with information from the 2016 American Community Survey(ACS),were used to develop a population profile for the study area. As shown in Table 2-1,the population of Key West increased nearly 6.7 percent from 2010 to 2016, from 24,413 to 26,039. From 2010 to 2016,the tabor force also continued to grow, but at a slower rate, approximately 3.3 percent. Table 2-1: Population Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016 Characteristic 2000 2010 2016 %Change %Change 2000-2010 2010-2016 Population 25,478 24,413 26,039 -4.2 6.7 Households 11,016 10,929 9,653 -0.8 -11.7 Number of workers 18,795 18,011 18,611 -4.2 3.3 Land area (sq. mi.) 5.9 5.6 5.6' -5.3 0.0 Person per household 2.3 2.2 2.7 -3.4 20.8 Workers per household 1.7 1.6 1.9 -3.4 17.0 Persons per square mile of land area 4,318 4,367 4,658 1.1 6.7 Workers per square mile of land area 3,185 3,222 3,329 1.1 3.3 'Uses 2010 Census. Sources:2000 and 2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 A review of population trends also was conducted for the entire Key West Census County Division (CCD).The trend analysis included Key West, Big Coppitt Key CDP,Stock Island CDP, and the remainder of the CCD.Table 2-2 provides population trends for the CCD for 2000,2010, and 2016. Table 2-2: Population and Trends, Key West,2000-2016 2010-2016 2000-2016 Geography 2000 2010 2016 Recent�/a Change �/o Change Aul!Trend Trend, City of Key West 25,478 24,413 26,039 6.7 A 2.2 Big Coppitt Key CDP 2,959 2,458 3,062 24.6 A 3.5 A Stock Island CDP 4,410 3,919 4,214 7.5 A -4.4 Remainder of CCD 1,247 1,379 1,557 12.9 A 24.9 w1w Sources:2000 and 2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 Key West continues to have the largest population; however it has experienced less population growth proportionally in recent years. Big Coppitt Key experienced an approximately 25 percent population increase during the 2010-2016 period and is followed by the remainder of the CCD and Stock Island in terms of recent population growth rates. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-3 160 of 40L2906 I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIVUIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ,,,,. Age ICEistri[ ,ition Age is an important factor affecting transit demand,as data show some age segments have more tendency to use transit than others.As shown in Figure 2-1, approximately 28 percent of Key West's population is below age 15 or above age 65,two groups that have a higher propensity for using public transportation. Map 2-2 shows the geographical distribution of older adults. Figure 2-1:Age Distribution, Key West,2016 65+,13.8% Under 15, I�IIIU 14.2% 15 to 24,10.9% 45 to 64,29.0% i�/%""""///�J l 25 to 44,32.0% Note:%may not add up to 100 due to rounding Source:ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 14 u a t,it in a in y II im 14oy im C Iin t: Ily C in it C Map 2-3 shows the population densities for Key West in 2016,developed based on the ACS Five-Year Estimates by block group.Currently,the highest population density is concentrated in the northwestern part of the city,just north of the airport.Other high population density areas include the Downtown business district and the central part of the Key. l:rnpI,oyrnent Map 2-4 shows the employment densities for Key West in 2016, also based on ACS Five-Year Estimates by block group.As expected,the majority of the employed are concentrated in the Downtown business district.Other dense employment areas include the southern corridor of the Key, areas where many attractions and retail destinations are located. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-4 161 of 40L2907 co !W. C " I� �J 'ry 0 / / N .. ,.. ......................... CD CD o `R R CID r I I uluullulil�lll�liiiiiiiiiuiq n05 CD CD � 0�1 mo Cu QA ......... .. �ulluuw ��., plllllllpllll i fldl IN Inc 4 IS � Q �MWIi + ID�f IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��������� �f Y �V � III����������IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� �t i� umllllm ,... ass .../fyy �% f� JNNE ��mllliom� m� IIIIII �0 V� I LID IIII uuuuuuuuuuuuu ` o C II f 45 it i 00 pp ev rl- ' ev rn r.. CN f ✓ �mmmm � :::> � I" is m� a � ���II CO CD rl— �lu i i 0 a. N f [ Cu r b. �r q r „ul, y f f . ° mmm � Nil i 0 LO m uumml uuumu ,-, 0 � III uuumuum 0 IIII uuuuuuuuuuuuu � ,u "ter N ,l 2�rm a u / S / Illl41 1 o o0 r "u IBM IBM CD N uuNroMEN01111111 mull f 4ip U 4, ;, CC7 /)u, Ell 0� Njjj,jj�� mom 'r „ J U"�A.. \\ CD N Vo \ // � m rM1 / 0 0 t %AO �r ) �� / " uuu / W i / umu �9 / " 4pG r 1�4i MENty ME G co m uumml uuumu f�F ", y IIIIIIIIIIII � P, m m OR LLI bar In CD LID �Y���}(Tsa IIIII� m uumml uuumu IIII uuuuuumu 0 i f IIII a L.. IIII IIIIIIIIII V l II(IIIIIII �� (IIIIIII // IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIII VUV. / / ir/ r � KEG'C N'NE°CT ONS Sod Sodo I. ini git a III III i c: Char,acteristics and II rends Labor (Force A review of the type of employment in Key Westwas conducted usingACS data,with the Key West economy broken down by industry sector, as shown in Figure 2-2. Based on these data for 2016,the two largest sectors are Service occupations (30%), as expected,due to the high number of visitors to the city,followed by Management, business,science,and arts occupations (30%), making up over half of the city's employment.These sectors coincide with supporting Key West's thriving tourist economy year round.The economy is rounded out by sales and office occupations, natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations, and production,transportation,and material moving occupations. Figure 2-2: Employment by Occupation, Key West,2016 Production, transportation,and material moving Service occupations,7% occupations, 30% Natural JJJlr111lJllJJJ�I ///f I�l� Il resources, �� �aJJJJJ�Ir construction, JJ�JIII, f and I Idl, maintenan occupations,c 9% / Management, Sales and office r° business, occupations, "'. science,and arts 24% occupations, 30% Note:%may not add up to 100 due to rounding Source:ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-8 165 of 40L2911 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS income IDistril:x,ition Earned annual income also can be a key indicator for determining pubiictransit needs of an area,as low-income populations tend to use transit more than the higher-income earners.According to 2016 ACS data, nearly 20 percent of Key West's 9,653 households had an annual income of less than $25,000.The U.S.Census Bureau defines the poverty threshold as under$25,000 for a family of four with two children. Key West has seen a considerable increase in the amount of households in poverty since 2000,when only 5.8 percent received assistance. In addition, a significant portion of the population earned higher incomes,over$75,000. However, although the higher-income segment of population typically is less inclined to use transit,conditions in Key West such as parking issues and traffic congestion may make transit a viable alternative. Figure 2-3 shows the annual household income range for current residents of Key West. Figure 2-3: Income Distribution, Key West,2016 Less than $14,999 12% $15,000 to$24,999 $75,000 or more 8%fia,; 38% $25,000 to$34,999 l 10% $50,000 to$74,999 $35,000 to$49,999 20/o ° o 12/o Note:%may not add up to 100 due to rounding Source:ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 Minority IPe„ pi ,slatie„ n s A relatively small number of minority populations live in Key West; however,the city is becoming more ethnically diverse.A shown in Table 2-3,from 2000 to 2016, Key West had gradual change in gender distribution and a notable increase in the number of residents of Hispanic or Latino origin.The percent of Buck or African American residents rose 2.3,whereas the percent of Asian,American Indian, and Alaska Native residents stayed the same between 2000 and 2016.The percent of Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders decreased to 0, and those identifying as Other decreased to 2.9. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-9 166 of 40L2912 IIIIII IIII II VIIIIIIV /IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIVIL. ....,,.... IIIIIIII // i KEY C N'NE°CT1ONS Table 2-3: Demographic Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016 Characteristic 2000 2010 2016 Trend Gender Male 55% 53.2% 51.9% Female 45% 46.8% 48.1% A Race/Ethnicity White 84.9% 82.2% 84.4% Black or African American 9.3% 13.5% 11.6% American Indian and Alaska Native 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% — Asian 1.3% 1.6% 1.3% — Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.2% 0% Other 4.1% 4.2% 3.9% Hispanic Origin Not of Hispanic/Latino origin 83.5% 81.3% 78.4% Hispanic/Latino origin 16.5% 18.7% 21.6% A Note:%may not add up to 100 due to rounding Source:2000 Census,2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 Limited IEngh sh Proficiency (L.JEP) Aithough the number of residents of Hispanic or Latino origin is increasing,so is the number of people who speak Spanish in some capacity. Nearly 66 percent of the Key West population speaks Spanish and English to a varying degree, and 34 percent speak only English, as shown in Figure 2-4.Oniy 4 percent of the popuiation does not speak English at ail, and 29 percent speak Spanish and English "very weii."Approximateiy 2 percent speak Polish, and approximately 1 percent speak French. Map 2- 5 shows the distribution of LEP households are in Key West. Foreign Bgrin IPe„ pi ,slatie„ n s In addition to typical rider markets,foreign-born populations,especially from areas with heavy transit use, may indicate support for transit. Key West is home to a diverse group of people,with approximately 20.3 percent of residents born outside the United States,7 percent higher than the national average.Almost one quarter,22 percent,are from European countries,which is more than double the rate in Florida (10%),65 percent are from Latin American countries,and 11 percent are from Asian countries, a rate lower than the state average. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-10 167 of 40L2913 „u N MEN C MEN / 0 MEN / IMENl� uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumulill / AIRMEN ,... mulill MEN c o,00OMEN cu m / rrrMEN i MEN C 3 r IBM a ,,,,,%/ 9 o o O//% 4ta 6} CD CO I, [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[INI IBM ,.r. r 1 co mill. r I IIIIII � � ,r�ii �plllin �0 Y' IIIIII10 Pill U) 1. mmmiiiii IIII llilluu � /ir/ir � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111110 / �,,, / o / rrr ar IIIIII D// %� �/ �/ 1 ////ii%.... In i Illllllullllllllllllllllllll' ,;/� ,,,ii 'ii////// % � ���ul�pca�{» -lim muumlll�ll / IIIIIII � �,�, ��I,, �' �� ������ f �» �, LO �b b Cq mi IIIIIIIIIII N IIII � i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 f I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII�UIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ;,,,, ,. err 1�. Figure 2-4: Languages Spoken, Key West,2016 Speak Spanish,speak Speak Spanish,speak English English"not well," 14°/®„,.... not at all,4% .mmm° Speak only English,34% Speak Spanish, r speak English"well,"29% �� Speak Spanish,speak Source:ACS5-Year Estimates2012-2016 English"very well,"29% TD IPe„ pi ,station Trends Monroe County Transit(MCT) provides public transportation to the transportation disadvantaged (TD) population in the Florida Keys (from mile marker 0 in Key West through mile marker 113 in Key Largo),including persons who are eligible for Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) sponsored trips, namely persons with disabilities,older adults, low-income persons,children who are high-risk or at-risk, and persons without their own mode of transportation. FDOT's CTD 2017 Annual Operating and Performance Report explains the trends in TD population and how the population is served throughout the county.Table 2-4 shows that the Monroe County TD population rose by more than 10 percent,from 39,050 in 2013 to 44,132 in 2017.As of the end of 2017, roughly half of the number of TD rides served in 2013 were currently served from Monroe County's TD services. Figure 2-5 shows the number of TD passengers served and the total TD population during the five-year period during 2013-2017.The noticeable decline in trips,even with the increase in TD population, may be partially related to the reclassification of Medicaid to other providers and the reduction of funding made available to the CTC. Table 2-4:TD Population and Trips Trend,2013-2017 Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-2017 %Change Potential TD Population 39,050 40,004 42,005 43,052 44,132 13% TD Trips 102,761 91,177 77,879 63,570 58,630 43% Source:FDOT CTD 2017Annual Operating and Performance Report City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-12 169 of 40L2915 I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII�UIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ;,,,, ,. err 1�. Figure 2-5:TD Population and Trips Trend,2013-2017 102,761 91,177 77,879 ,v 63,570 58,630 Popu4aflon 42 005 44 132 "`��Tiriips 39,050 40,004 43,052 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source:FDOT CTD 2017Annuol Operating and Performance Report Ed ,.scation Attainiment Education level is an important factor in an area's population make-up,as the level of education has been shown to correlate with income,which affects the population's use of public transit. Key West's education attainment has rapidly increased since 2010,with the number of people holding a bachelor's degree or higher increasing by 2.5 times,from 12 percent in 2010 to 31 percent in 2016. Although the number of advanced degrees has rapidly increased,the number of people who have completed high school degree or the equivalent has fallen 6 percent,from 35 percent in 2010 to 29 percent in 2016. Figure 2-6 shows the level of education attainment that Key West has achieved. Figure 2-6: Educational Attainment, Key West,2016 Less than High School, Bachelors or higher, , 10% 31% j High School Degree or equivalent,29% Some College or Associates Degree,30% �� Source:ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-13 170 of 40L2916 I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII�UIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ;,,,, ,. err 1�. Poverty IC.evel, s A minor but consequentiai increase in the proportion of people living below the poverty level and receiving supplemental income assistance indicates growth in transit-dependent riders.The proportion of families living below the poverty level in Key West since 2000 grew by approximately 16 percent as of 2016; moreover, households receiving public assistance income grew by approximately 87 percent over the same period. However, a decrease of approximately 21 percent was observed among households receiving Supplemental Security Income,which provides stipends to low-income individuals and persons with disabilities who are age 65 and older, as shown in Table 2-5. Table 2-5: Poverty, Key West,2000-2016 2000 2010 2016 Trend Threshold Key Florida Key Florida Key Florida Key West West West West Families below poverty level(last 12 mos) 5.8% 9.0% 7.0% 9.9% 6.7% 11.7% Households with Supplemental Security 3.3% 4.2% 2.2% 3.6% 2.6% 5.0% Income Households with public assistance income 1.5% 2.8% 1.7% 1.5% 2.8% 2.2% (cash) Households with Food Stamp/SNAP benefits n/a n/a 6.6% 8.5% 7.1% 14.8% A Sources:2000 and 2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 Low-Income Households Income level is an important indicator for planning transportation needs in a city.Those who tend to earn less income or are below the poverty level may tend to rely on public transportation in greater proportions.According to the ACS, approximately 6.7 percent of Key West residents live below the poverty level, making public transportation a critical need for many Key West residents. Map 2-6 shows the distribution of households that are low-income. Low-Income E1"YBf9(C7)/E:es Based on LEHD data from the U.S.Census,approximately 2,800 residents earn less than $1,250 per month or less than $15,000 per year, a segment of low-income population that has higher tendency to use transit as a mode of travel in Key West.Table 2-6 provides several descriptive statistics about this population cohort, and Figure 2-7 is a geographic representation of the concentration of the related employer locations within the city. More than 25 percent of this employee group are above age 54; nearly 14 percent are of Hispanic origin,and 10 percent are Black orAfrican American,segments of the population with a higher propensity to use transit. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-14 171 of 40L2917 co N y�w� "� r ;",„ '" ' � >TV������ ����,r,n�r���!�i�,U�'J7+9A,Y,�,�✓Zr��mD�r�m��uni�ioyivaxNnuu�yyy�l,»� N� VWOo'JOVVUV}� 4 CN IT ev �dIII cv „qav°qu�W,wugl�l}V ^ q�II, Ek CD Lo �} rn IZ IZ 0 i s� s� hl `„ j IIIIIIIIIII � .., IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII r . V ^� IIIII q 11 MA / .� r m Ilgl ifl mi 1�11pl4jgp uun mh ' ��/I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� una'^� ry(�}I},', �'"1/ J� INN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII {, .....�^ N fW t"lflrll�ilJ��Illr I 6�11 k uuuuuuu opus} f� iilr � � �� uu ,uuuuum uum � a,.. LO c� i 0 � i f I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIVUIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ,,,,. Table 2-6: Profile of Employees Earning$15,000 or Less Annually, Key West,2015 Characteristic Total Percent Total Employees Earning Less than$15,000 Annually Employees 2,802 16.5%" Employee Age Age 29 or younger 932 33.3% Ages 30 to 54 1,155 41.2% Age 55 or older 715 25.5% Top Industries Accommodation and Food Services 1,130 40.3% Retail Trade 605 21.6% Educational Services 180 6.4% Administration&Support,Waste Management and Remediation 155 5.5% Health Care and Social Assistance 123 4.4% Employee Race White 2,414 86.2% Black or African American 268 9.6% American Indian or Alaska Native 12 0.4% Asian 54 1.9% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2 0.1% Other 52 1.9% Employee Hispanic Heritage Not Hispanic or Latino 2,417 86.3% Hispanic or Latino 385 13.7% *Total number of employees taken from US Census Note:%may not add up to 100 due to rounding Source:2015 LEHD Figure 2-7: Locations of Jobs Paying Less than$15,000 Annually, Key West 95-368 JobsASgMle 369-822 JobsiSq.Mile 823_1,457 JokasASq.Mile 1,45875 JobsASq.Mile 1 2 Jobs o 3_14 Jabs 0 15.46Jobs Source:2015 LEHD @42-108 Jobs 109-211 Jobs City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-16 173 of 40L2919 I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIVUIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ,,,,. ra ve Ih a vit o- a in d CIim Iim u t;il Iil g IL Ire in Data avai[abie from the ACS also were used to assess travel behaviors and patterns in Key West for people who commute for work.This analysis provided geographic commuting patterns of jobs by the employment.Table 2-7 shows that public transit's mode share,defined as the percentage of travelers using public transportation, increased from 2000 to 2016, as did driving alone and other modes (i.e., bicycling,taxi, motorcycle).Carpooling decreased from nearly 11 percent to approximately 6 percent, and walking and working from home decreased marginally.Travel times increased marginally across the board,with approximately three-quarters of people traveling for more than 10 minutes in 2016 than 2000. Table 2-7:Journey-to-Work Characteristics, Key West,2000-2016 Characteristic 2000 2010 2016 Trend Place of Work Worked inside n/a 90.9% 85.2% county Worked outside n/a 9.1% 14.8% w5 county Mode to Work Drive alone 55.8% 54.2% 57.9% A Carpool 10.9% 7.1% 6.1% Public transit 1.2% 1.8% 2.6% A Walk 8.0% 7.4% 7.0% Work at home 5.7% 7.7% 5.2% Other 18.4% 21.8% 21.2% Travel Time to Work <10 minutes 31.1% 39.2% 26.4% 10-19 minutes 53.7% 48.3% 55.4% wtw 20-29 minutes 9.3% 7.9% 11.4% 30-44 minutes 3.8% 3.0% 4.2% wtw 45+minutes 2.2% 1.5% 2.7% Departure Time to Work 6:00-9:00 AM 63.8% 56.8% 60.5% Other times 36.2% 43.2% 39.5% wtw Private Vehicle Occupancy 2-person carpool 9.2% 5.4% 5.0% 3-person carpool 1.0% 1.4% 0.8% 4+-person carpool 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% Sources:2000&2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 A�,Aornobil,e Ownership The number of households without access to a vehicle may also indicate the attractiveness of transit, as automobile ownership heavily influences the need to rely on public transit. Household vehicle ownership showed noteworthy changes during the 2010-2016 period; households zero vehicles fell City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-17 174 of 40L2920 I UIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIVUIIIIIII11UUu uuu uuui luau � ,,,,. from 11.4 percent in 2010 to 7.1 percent in 2016, and households with two vehicles rose substantially, to 40.9 percent, as summarized in Table 2-8. Map 2-7 shows the areas of concentrations of zero- vehicle households in Key West. Table 2-8:Vehicle Availability, Key West,2010 and 2016 Characteristic 2010 2016 Trend None 11.4% 7.1% One 38.4% 36.9% Two 33.5% 40.9% wlw Three or more 16.7% 15.1% Sources:2010 Census,ACS 5-Year Estimates 2012-2016 Ce„ rnirm,itin Ilnflows/D,Aflows To assess local trends and patterns of commuters, an analysis using 2015 Longitudinal Employer- Household Dynamics (LEHD) and Longitudinal Origin-Destination Employment Statistics(LODES) data ("OntheMap," U.S.Census Bureau)was completed.This analysis provided geographic commuting patterns ofjobs by employment and residential locations based on composite information of local unemployment insurance earnings data,Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data of where workers live and work,firm characteristics such as industry, and survey data. Table 2-9 and Figure 2-8 show the aggregate of local commuting patterns by commuter outflow and inflow for Key West using 2015 LODES data.Approximately 67 percent of employed Key West residents work in the city, and approximately 33 percent commute outside Key West.Commuters leaving the city commute to Stock Island (7.0%), Big Coppitt Key(4.2%), Marathon (3.2%), and Big Pine Key (2.7%),as shown in Table 2-9.Some commuters travel as far as Homestead or Miami to work. Table 2-9:Commuter Outflows, Key West,2015 Geography Number of Workers Percent Stock Island CDP 1,134 7.0% Big Coppitt Key 684 4.2% CDP Marathon 527 3.2% Big Pine Key CDP 479 3.0% Key Largo CDP 436 2.7% Cudjoe Key CDP 291 1.8% Islamorada,Village 201 1.2% of Islands Homestead 105 0.6% Miami 92 0.6% All Other Locations 3,908 24.1% Note:Of Key West's 8,368 workers,66.7016 work in the city. Source:2015 LEHD City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-18 175 of 40L2921 N N N 45 o � Oil III o 0 CD CI) i„ 0 cv iff �if'w 1 v, uu� s) m � 0 o cn rn hug :� w r.a o 0 CD s I , <F! N lrr J� uumum / J %fv fJry11yU{ i uuuuum������uuuuuuu ui ,i , i uuuuuuu uuuumum �,i6 Niii�r"�" �% uuu uuuuuuuuuuuu r�oi o ;hi{IS n� 14 �� uuuuuuuuuuu S, F �� a�Ji IUiU" ............................. '" 0 _ ,.,,, ISI U,F 0° �� V1 /� ll iluuumuum _ p 6 s oo m�''� f ,r um umu {y�mo Iq� N�^"^��6a{{� fur No�u�i��' "'a��� i(�nw� u m LO j I� "Illy LO m uumml uuumu � c� I IIII uuuuuuuuuuuuu '.. 0 f V IIIIIIIIL /IIIII. ....r,.... III. ..IIII IIIII.II IIIIII.IIIIIIIIII II ll IIIIIIII �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ � ��j�/ 4 ICI VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'�Y iYly r, r r,r KEY C NNECRONS Stock Isiand had the highest percent of commuter inflow into Key Westin 2015,at 2.7 percent, followed by Miami at 1.6 percent and Marathon at 1.3 percent, as shown in Table 2-10.Some commuters traveled from as far as Boca Raton and Hialeah for work-related purposes. Figure 2-8: Key West Commuter Outflows Mliami 02, a 291 Homestead CVdjoe Key,, 105 10F O/ 1,134 5tnck Island 84 Big �'p',coatt Key Largo �a .....Key , " 0 436 Ke 4Nest IslaTorada 241 Legend 479 i <250 Big�m Ke V y MIil N1on 251-500 o, w � ro w ro�a m mmmmre a, '501 r , eri7"L A� Keys West Note:Of Key West's 8,368 workers,66.7016 work in the city. Source:2015 LEHD Table 2-10: Commuter Inflows, Key West,2015 Geography Number of Percent Workers Stock Island CDP 335 2.7% Miami 195 1.6% Marathon 160 1.3% Fort Lauderdale 118 0.9% Islamorada, 102 0.8% Village of Islands Key Largo CDP 82 0.7% Boca Raton 81 0.6% Big Pine Key CDP 72 0.6% Hialeah 64 0.5% All Other 2,968 23.7% Locations City of Key West TDP Draft Report 2-20 177 of 40L2923 V IIIIIIIIL / IIII IIIII. IIIII. ....r,.... II II II IIIIII. IIIIIIII �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ � ��j// 4 ICI VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'Y iYly r, r r,r KEY C NNECRONS Figure 2-9: Key West Commuter Inflows „e<<r„,.D, „�,,,,,, Hialeah: Miami Baca Ratan 64 195 /81 Port Lauderdale 118 %F Homestead /0 1105 0/001/0 335 r Stock tstan Key Largo 82 key west //r Islama�rada /�// � ' ��� NO2 Legend 72 /i r ' <'1 bb Bija,Pline ✓ aar €l.antrcc kJc�,rr7 1101-150 Cak1n an Boa f i.,� "�y,o^I ' /v✓J rr )�)'I t. 1 5'U1 >151 i/�r rf ir �.Q r Key'West Note:Of Key West's 8,368 workers,66.7016 work in the city. Source:2015 LEHD a�oii,. d v ty Center's and IL iirii III Generator's Major trip attractors are places with a great need for residents to travel to them either for employment, recreation,or shopping and include medical facilities, recreational areas,educational establishments, major shopping centers, and government or business offices.Although Key West is not home to major educational establishments or regional mails,it attracts millions of people from ail over the world with its signature trip generators of beaches,cultural celebrations, leisure resorts, retail, and outdoor attractions. In addition to many worid-renowned beaches and luxurious resorts, Key West also is home to the third largest coral barrier reef system in the world and is the only living reef system in the continental U.S.This attraction is more than 5,000 years old and is considered a historical attraction. The major hub of activity in Key West is its Downtown District,which includes Mallory Square and the Duval Street corridor. Mallory Square has been a favorite community meeting place since it was established in the 1820s as a location from which to watch sunsets and shop.The Downtown District, also known as Old Town,is the historic district of Key West with more than 2,400 historic buildings and most tourist attractions on the west side of the island. Duval Street,while only about one mile long,contains a diverse set of popular restaurants,shops, and bars;it also has tour services, museums, and an aquarium. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-21 178 of 40L2924 V IIIIIIIIL /IIIII. ....r,.... III. ..IIII IIIII.II IIIIII.IIIIIIIIII II l IIIIIIII �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ � ��j�/ 4 ICI VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'Y iYly r, r r,r KEY C NNECRONS Another key set of trip generators in an area is its major empioyers.The top 10 major empioyers in Key West are listed in Table 2-11.The largest employer,the US Armed Services, has a naval,air station and a military airport stationed in Key West,four miles east of the central, business district.This site supports the U.S. Department of Defense,the U.S. Department of Homeland Security,the Air National. Guard,the Army National.Guard,and other federal,agencies. Table 2-11: Major Employers, Key West Rank Employer Name Employees 1 US Armed Services 2,190 2 Monroe County Schools 1,183 3 Ocean Reef Club 1,123 4 Monroe County Government 570 5 Publix 540 6 Monroe County Sheriff's Office 539 7 City of Key West 501 8 Lower Keys Medical Center 437 9 Casa Marina/Reach Resort 356 10 Spottswood Properties 355 Source:Key West Chamber of Commerce a p as iir IlD vd a I6 uaa n t & c d aJty One of the most notable major developments in Key West is the new Truman Waterfront Park,shown in Figure 2-10,which opened recently and increased the amount of public space in the city.0nce fully completed,this space will include a community recreation center of more than 24,000 square feet that will include a gym,industrial kitchen, and public classroom space and space for concerts and community interactive events.The City plan retrofits other buildings on the property and add a playground, interactive water feature,sports field, amphitheater, public art, bicycle parking, pedestrian paths,and open space for the public to enjoy. Figure 2-11 and Figure 2-12 show the amphitheater and the bus stop that connects passengers to the Duval Loop. u iri st, and V/ i ,air Il.... ve� Key West is a world-famous travel destination,with tourists hailing from all over the globe to experience what the city has to offer. It has a thriving tourist industry that welcomes millions of visitors every year and,as a result, has a gross economic output of billions of dollars every year. Key West's tourism has experienced increases of more than two million tourists per year since 2009. As shown in Table 2-12 and Figure 2-13,the number of international visitors to Key West is more than one million per year,with the highest percentage from Canada,Germany,the United Kingdom, France, and China,which make up 65 percent of tourists;68 other countries make up the remaining 35 percent of annual visitors,as shown in Figure 2-12. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-22 179 of 40L2925 V IIIIIIIIL /III. ..IIII IIIII.II II II IIIIII. IIIIIIII // IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ � ��j�/ 4 ICI VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'�Y iYly r, KEY CONNEMONS Figure 2-12:Truman Waterfront Park Concept Plan j II J /fir�.+,✓ / r r IWII � y r �J �fAM" �r 4,N�ASk 41M Wr/ /a ���� vi �� R•-.a��Y RC r i'+' v.sfra 4 wnµ rYary 4ru J it V I � ........... (�tititi�h� � / w M 9 A VII I�i� r v; �� % ��� I % "lrxio uuuum uuuuumm I Figure 2-11:Truman Waterfront Park Figure 2-10:Truman Waterfront Park Duval Amphitheater Loop bus stop access Table 2-12: Foreign Tourists, Key West,2008-2016 Year Number of Tourists 2008 381,900 2009 392,000 2010 402,200 2011 503,700 2012 543,400 2013 709,740 2015 1,158,100 2016 1,114,300 Note:2014 data unavailable Source:Key West Travel Guide City of Key West TDP Draft Report 2-23 180 of 40L2926 V IIIIIIIIL /IIIII. ....r,.... IIIII ..IIII IIIII.II IIIIII.IIIIIIIIII II l IIIIIIII �� II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII VVUUUVVU.... rr �� r //��j//�/�j/ �/�� �r r�jr�� UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ J ��j�/ 4 I� ril VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'�Y iYly r, r r,r KEY CONNEC ONS Figure 2-13: Foreign Tourists, Key West,2008-2016 1,158,100 1,114,300 709,740 503,700 543,400 381,900 392,000 402,200 2008 2009 20.1.0 201.1 20.1.2 20.1.3 20.1.5 20.1.6 Note:2014 data unavailable Source:Key West Travel Guide Figure 2-14:Top 5 Origins of Foreign Tourists, Key West,2016 IIII ,IIIIIIIIL ,IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII ,IIII ,IIIIIIIIL ,IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII ,IIIIIIIIL ,IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII ,IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII ,IIIIIIIIL ,IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII Canada "IIII IIII" i IIII' 'II IIII' 'II IIII' 'llll IIII' 'llll�I T wI T IIII"111 IIII' 'II IIII' 'llll IIII' 'llll wI T IIII"111 IIII' 'II IIII' 'llll IIII' i 111 IIII' 'II IIII' 'llll IIII' 'llll IIII' 'llll IIII' i IIII' "IIII IIII" 'i IIII' 'II IIII' 'llll IIII' 'llll IIII' i IIII' "IIII 3 0% Germany 14% UK @ 8% France 7% China 4% Source:Analysis of data from Key West Travel Guide In addition to the number of tourist visits and compositions, hotel.occupancy trends were aiso reviewed.Currently,the City has permitted 39 hoteis,29 moteis,45 bed and breakfast lodgings, 118 transient multi-unit complexes, and 307 vacation rentals, making up the 6,796 rental units available to tourists.The city experienced an increasing lodging occupancy until peaking in 2014,then had three consecutive years of decreasing occupancy rates through 2017, as shown in Figure 2-15.The average occupancy from 2008 to 2018 was 82 percent.Although occupancy rates decreased from 2014 to 2017,2018 was projected to trend upwards and match the average occupancy rate for 2016 at 84 percent. For month-based occupancy,the highest is March,with an average of 93 percent of units occupied, and the lowest is September,with an average of 60 percent. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-24 181 of 40L2927 V IIIIIIIIL /IIIII. ....r,.... III. ..IIII IIIII.II II II IIIIII. IIIIIIII �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ J ��j�/ 4 I� ril VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'Y iYly r, r r,r KEY CONNEMONS Figure 2-15: Hotel Occupancy Rates, Key West,2008-2018 83% 83% 87% 87% 85% 84% 84% 77% 78% 80% 74% � .,...,;11 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018* *Note:2018 statistics based on reported statistics from January through June,July through December projections based on statistics from previous five years. Source:Key West Chamber of Commerce As Key West is a city with a lot of history and surrounded by water, it is a popular piace for cruise ships to stop,with,on average, more than 750,000 visitors per year.These tourists are unique in that they have no form of transit and do not occupy units in the city.A consequence of Key West receiving tourists from a i i over the worid is that most do not have access to a vehicle or may not chose to drive in a city aiready congested with traffic and,therefore, may rely on public transit during their stay. r e 7�r, 9 a �n r � uuu � Source:Comival.com/key-west-cruises Weather, Although Key West has a healthy and abundant tourist industry, most attractions are dependent on weather and the elements.The city is known for the sunshine and nice beaches aii year, but inciement weather from hurricanes is sometimes a deterrent to tourists.The quality of weather has an impact on transportation services due to its impacts on local economy and the community overall. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-25 182 of 40L2928 V IIIIIIIIL /IIIII. ....r,.... III. ..IIII IIIII.II IIIIII.IIIIIIIIII II l IIIIIIII �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. _.. ,. /// // /��/UUUVUUVVVUUVVU ,,. %/ � ��j�/ 4 ICI VIVO 1Vf I1V„(I 1YU'Y iYly r, r r,r KEY C NNECRONS Traffic congestion is a major issue in Key West,especially in key tourist areas such as Old Town, and is worse during tourist season.The City responded with many strategies to reduce the use of vehicles in the often-narrow roadways and, most recently, increased parking rates and limited parking spaces. However,congestion continues to be a major issue impacting residents and visitors.Table 2-13 shows some of the most congested segments of roadway in Key West. Table 2-13:Congested Roadways, Key West Road Classification Adopted LOS Existing LOS Duval Street Minor Arterial D F Palm Avenue Minor Arterial D E Truman Avenue Principal Arterial C F US-1 Principal Arterial C E LOS indicates roadway level ofservice,measured fromA to F,with A being Free Flow and Fbeing forced or breakdown flow. Source:Monroe County and City of Key West A traffic study developed by the Old Town area in [ate 2017 indicated the importance of using design principles that discourage auto travel and promote alternative modes of transportation such as pedestrian walkability, bicycle connectivity, and transit use. Cwrr,ent and II utwre II and Use and DenOies i A review of emerging land uses was conducted for the baseline conditions assessment, as shown in Figure 2-16. Key West emphasizes historic preservation in the city,with a chapter of the City's municipal code dedicated to outlining efforts to keep the character of Key West intact,which is important to tourism appeal as well as to permanent residents.Although historic preservation is important, new development in the city is keeping it innovative. Key West has invested in opening new public spaces along the waterfront to encourage tourists and residents to enjoy the community space.Current and future land use are designed to promote community appearance and enhance natural amenities.As shown in Figure 2-16: • A significant amount of land use is dedicated to military(yellow) and conservation (green) land use. Military allocation is very prominent in the northwest and southern extremities of Key West, and conservation dominates the southwest region. • Much of the concentrated town area is dedicated to historic purposes,either historic commercial (dark pink), historic residential (light pink),or historic public/semi-public (brown). • The low-density residential (orange) area is in a grid organization that is surrounded by conservation (green), medium-density(light blue), and general commercial (red) uses. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 2-26 183 of 40L2929 �a M N dew° � rf CD CN 00 o All c1 cj LO i I' i m i lull Im � � II p did 1� 4i F n i bA LL. r-r L, O QL a 4, = p v o J pIR / r/ Ipii,, � .� II II IIII� II IIIIII III. i IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIII O V.o10 �� KEY OrvNIff"ON9 Section, 3: SerilcesIIII IIII Illi Existing pubiic transportation services in Key West inciude fixed-route bus service provided by the City and paratransit service provided by Monroe County.This section presents an overview of pubiic transportation services and faciiities provided by KWT, and information on other transportation services in Key West is summarized.A performance trend analysis and a peer agency review were conducted to assess how efficiently KWT supplies its fixed-route transit services and how effectively those services meet the needs of the area.These analyses include use of critical performance indicators to provide a starting point for understanding the existing system's ievei of performance. OvC iir v ii C II � iX st ii ill IL O . m s fFixed..lRm,ite IM,,is Service Fixed-route service has been provided in Key West since 1972 and has been expanded muitipie times, currently serving the city and reaching as far north as Marathon.Current service includes six routes that operate seven days per week and two routes (Orange and Red)that operate Monday through Saturday. Route frequencies vary based on the route and day of service but typicaiiy are 1-2 hours, except the Duval. Loop,which operates every 30 minutes from 6:00-10:00 AM and thereafter at 15- minute frequencies until.12:00 AM.The earliest bus operation begins at 5:00 AM with the Biue route and ends pwithp e Service th e Duval.and Lower Keys routes at 12:00 midnight. Para In addition to fixed-route bus,services for persons qualifying under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are provided,complementing the existing public transportation service for residents who live within 3/4 mile on either side of the fixed-route system but are unable to access it due to an eligible disability. Monroe County provides and schedules appointments forADAservice one hour prior to a trip and Monday-Friday 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.Scheduled pickup times forADA service are 8:00 AM-5:00 PM, and trips have a 30-minute pickup window. Monroe County Transit(MCT) provides paratransit in the Florida Keys from mile marker0 in Key West through mile marker 113 in Key Largo. Its meets the requirement of the ADA and provides door-to- door service to those who qualify. The Guidance/Care Center is the designated Community Transportation Coordinator(CTC)for Monroe County. It has three locations throughout the Keys—Upper Keys, Middle Keys, and Lower Keys.The remainder of trips under the ADA,TD, and Agency categories is supplied by six other contracted providers. fFixed..lRm,it ervice Overview A summary of KWT's current fixed-route service,fare structure, recent ridership trends, and inventory of transit facilities and vehicles is presented in Table 3-1.As shown,the newly-introduced and free City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-1 185 of 40L2931 II u III.II IIII IIII IIIIIIII I IIIII. / IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII � � �� // /���/ IV o10 �� KEY Orvn ECTION9 Duval Loop carries more than 317,000 riders, about half of system ridership.The route with the next- highest ridership demand is the Lower Key shuttle,which connects more than 88,000 riders to the city for work and other purposes.Currently,Orange is the lowest-performing route,with 28,000 riders. Table 3-1: Key West Transit Service Summary Key Weekday Weekend Route Weekday Weekend 2018 Color/Name Locations/Corridors Service Span Service Span Ridership Served Frequency Frequency 30 min 30 min 6:00 AM- Old Town/Downtown 6:00 AM-10:00 6:00 AM- 10:00 PM; 6:00 AM- Duval Loop Key West bordering pm;15 min 317,320 Duval St 10:00 AM-12:00 12:00 AM 15 min 10:00 AM- 12:00 AM 12:00 AM AM Lower Keys Old Town/Downtown 5:40AM- 5:40 AM- Pink Key West to Marathon 58/173 min 11:59 PM 86/173 min 11:59 PM 48,790 Hospital loop through northern part of Key 6:00 AM- Red via Roosevelt Blvd, 103/123 min 8:3 AM- 103/123 min Sun8:36 no 48,384 Palm Ave,Simonton 8:36 PM Sun no service St,Truman Ave Hospital loop through 5:00 AM- CBD via Roosevelt Blvd,Caroline St, 5:00 AM- 94/120 min; 8.25 PM, Blue Whitehead St, 94/120 min 8:25 PM Sun 92/116 min Sun 6:26 48,160 Simonton St, Flagler AM- Ave 8:19 PM Hospital loop through 5:30 AM- CBD via Roosevelt 10:31 PM; Green Blvd,Caroline St, 92/114 min 10:3 AM- 92/1 PM Sun 84/1 min;14 min Sun 5:35 47,839 Whitehead St, Flagler 0:3 /1 AM- Ave 8:59 PM Lower Keys Old Town/Downtown 5:35AM- 5:35 AM- Lime Key West to Marathon 53/160 min 11:43 PM 78/160 min 11:43 PM 39,798 Hospital loop through southern part of Key 6:15 AM- Orange via Flagler Ave, 106/126 min 7:2 AM- 106/126 min Sun7:28 no 27,715 Truman Ave, 7.28 PM Sun no service Roosevelt Blvd Source:Key West Transit Map 3-1 shows the existing fixed-route service provided, and Figure 3-1 shows a map of the Duval Loop,which circulates the Old Town historic section. It was introduced by KWT to serve the Old Town residents and workers and to shuttle visitors within the area and travels to popular spots,including the Key West Lighthouse, Mallory Square,Truman Waterfront Park, Key West Library, and Key West Theater,with frequencies every 30 minutes from 6:00-10:00 Am and every 15 minutes from 10:00 AM- 12:00 midnight. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-2 186 of 40L2932 jf N 121 ON j , f) m ' v r f FIR, . r { ,- uu uuuuuuuu 'I V( 9 tVIM won lr wf w o l T ' I 1'I, A� LLJ _. I Ir' 0 "€ 0 r II u III.II IIII IIII IIIIIIII I IIIII. / IIII IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIII jj / / l/IV o10 �� KEY Orvn ECTION9 Figure 3-1: Duval Loop we"St iyii/rrlf an Pow � m Nmbwwwk M �iGlf��✓��lrro//� 00 49 0 i 11moOnDcq Wbitehead Won wWhitphimWoufliard 10 Whhtwdetroifii BA HAMA 400 � OUAGE 'mite),head UnRed Hednq Efta ethl ce", W,0: �� rw SCHEDULE,OF OPERA71TIONS o�w a�4u4 AIe�N %/� " I M M Source:CorfreekeywesLcom City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-4 188 of 40L2934 II u III.II IIII IIII IIIIIIII I IIIII. / IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII � � �� // /���/ IV o10 �� KEY Orvn ECTION9 Transit Facilhties In 2016, KWT unveiled its new LEED Silver-certified facility to help serve the 1 f community on College Road in Stock Island, adjacent to Key West. It is the 1 nerve center of the transits stems and currentlyaccommodates the KWDoT f m� _ ... (which runs KWT) administrative offices, bus operators, and transit mechanics., � � This capital improvementwas funded by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Park..and..lfRide IFackities The current ark-and-ride faci lit for KWT i is a 300-spa e public parking garage Grinnell n Caroline r located at G ell and Ca of e streets. �r Parking is available 24 hours per day,7 r days per week,with daily and hourly parking available to the general public and KWT bus riders.Anyone who uses the park-and-ride garage may ride any KWT route except the Lower Keys Shuttle for free until the$4-per-hour/$32-per-day parking ticket expires. With current KWT policy, anyone who parks at the parki ng facility can present a parkingticket stub to a KWT bus driver in lieu of a ticket when they board the bus except for the free Duval Loop.A number of KWT bus stops are located in close proximity to the garage for easy access to KWT buses. Vehide Ilinventory KWT's fleet consists of 22 active vehicles,as shown in Table 3-2.These fixed-route buses are equipped with Automatic Passenger Counters(APC) and real-time bus routing software that allows people to access their location by website or text message.The majority of the vehicles (68%) are still within their useful life, based on years according to FTA. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-5 189 of 40L2935 II u III.II IIII IIII IIIIIIII I IIIII. / IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII � � �� // /���/ IV o10 �� KEY Orvn ECTION9 Table 3-2: Key West Transit Vehicle Inventory Coach Vehicle Past Description Year Type Recommended Life? 29' Bus 2018 Gillig No 29' Bus 2018 Gillig No 29' Hybrid Bus 2018 Gillig No 35' Bus 2018 Gillig No 29' Bus 2017 Gillig No 29' Bus 2017 Gillig No 29' Bus 2016 Gillig No 35' Bus 2016 Gillig No 35' Bus 2016 Gillig No 29' Bus 2015 Gillig No 29' Bus 2015 Gillig No 29' Bus 2015 Gillig No 29' Hybrid Bus 2015 Gillig No 35' Bus 2008 Gillig No 35' Bus 2008 Gillig No 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2003 Gillig Yes 29' Bus 2001 Gillig Yes Source:Key West Transit Fares The current regular one-way adult cash fare on the KWT system is$2.00.Several other fare options are included in the current KWTfare structure,including 1-day,7-day,and 31-day passes,as shown in Table 3-3.Several discounted fare options also are available,inciudingfor students(up to age 21),individuals with disabilities, military personnel, and seniors on the Lower Keys Shuttle.Seniors 60 years and older who live in the City of Key West are fare free on City Routes and 100% Service-Connected U.S.Armed Services disabled veterans are fare free on the entire system. To receive a free or reduced fare, riders must show their ADA eligibility card or applicable photo ID. One-Way, 1-Day, and 7-Day passes can be purchased from the bus driver directly; 31-day passes may be ordered by mail or purchased with debit/credit cards at the following locations: • Department of Transportation,5701 College Road, Key West, FL 33040 • City of Key West Revenue Department, 1300 White Street, Key West, FL 33040 The current regular one-way adult cash fare on the KWT Lower Keys Shuttle is $4.00. Structured like City routes,there are multiple fare options including the 1-Day Pass,7-Day Pass, and the 31-Day Pass, shown in Table 3-3. KWT's Lower Keys Shuttle offers discounted fares for students (up to age 21),older City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-6 190 of 40L2936 II u III.II IIII IIII IIIIIIII I IIIII. / IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII � � �� // /���/ IV o10 �� KEY Orvn ECTION9 aduits (age 60 and oider), individuais with disabiiities, and miiitary personnel KWT aiso offers a One Day Super Pass that is valid on both City and the Lower Keys Shuttle for$12.00. Table 3-3: KWT Current Fare Structure Fare Category Regular Reduced Older Adults City One-Way $2.00 $1.00 Free 1-Day Pass $4.00 - 7-Day Pass $8.00 $5.00 31-Day Pass $25.00 $15.00 - Lower Keys One-Way $4.00 $2.00 $1.00 1-Day Pass $8.00 - - 7-Day Pass $25.00 $15.00 $15.00 31-Day Pass $75.00 $45.00 $45.00 Note:One Day Super Pass valid on both City and Lower Keys routes. Source:Key West Transit Ridership Trends A summary of the of ridership trends for KWT 2012-2018 is provided in Figure 3-2. Based on the data shown, the ridership for the system gradually decreased until 2017. With reconfiguration and implementation of a modified system with the new Duval Loop, ridership has increased significantly, more than doubling in 2018. Figure 3-2: Key West Transit Ridership Trends 578,006 359,885 332,945 339,389 324,141 298,36 5 243,09 1�"8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source:Key West Transit in�� i� ii� III ii� 11 ��� i� I6 ii,��:�� tii in II::'ir'ov ii iir Other private and public agencies offer transportation services for specific client groups, as shown in Table 3-4.These providers were contacted for general information about the services offered, and the information provided is summarized in the table. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-7 191 of 40L2937 / co M 0) N C. /�� �/ {. q MIN'" •t0 "(c Cf i ie�ry toL:J = `a't 3" f^�I s: a�rt �r+ o O O > �(>":J N oO X O W >, C Con O! W ,—i O Q0 W O N O I-- CO M M CJ m 0 N d' (D N N 00 1.0 CO M �' d' M O O O CO m S LO O M O to O N O N O Cf' O N O Q0 O Q0 O CO LO M G. M CY M N M 0 M N M CY M W M N ,-i m M N Lo i C1 u u v u v u u u Q.S L C L C L C L C C L O L / A Cl m a m a m m a Q) a� a Q > > > In r In > J •b _ a o a a O n o v CD i i p `i •� i i .� •� i W tiT M E �• NQQ1 �i 001 -O O C Q) N .\-I "� T N O N .j v- �•- �•- O O O `�- v- eY to O! ij O -O O! t0 N +•• N O M NI-R N L O O! Q! 1L Li LL Li LL <n O <a u O LL L.L to <n-L r J 'O Y �l 1 Q� :) Q m Q O Q m Q O O O Q O O � � O O O O O to O O O O � � .O .L O to N N W to O L) 61 d' p- IH m CY N N o In � In w w � In In � In I I I I I I I I I C C C C C C C C C C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL sFO.L0F�r O! 0 0 0 +OQ.,a +O Rv t O O O O O o v ,m � v> Q " C CL QQ O O Q Q > > QNQN Q)C Tm N C C C C N '6 C C C C O > N m N O N -6 f0 O! f0 O! In m N Q) N f0 cn f0 O! f0 O! O In 00 .� 00 u d u m u d u M .Q !0 v F d a u u., u u OL j v v uIU i .? O LCL O! Q) 0 N _ 0O C O y0 d! 00 T °' a V N Q) Q) O 0 O O p v N > N O 0 Q H L u u �c �2 L �2 2E u Q 57 J Q IL O. c c 0o a, � v o "o �° Q) 0 o R a L In O t _ v In , v f0 J Q) > O v 0) + u In In u u O C u >+ uo N U � 0 I.- ~v ( O 0) u Q v � v Q- > O t O v L. L1.0 o a v L n u D Ou L =' t� M CN 0 p u O > > m E a�i O `L" !�'-Eo 01 L o W C m bA m U \J cq a v h u m O CD I- CD CD CD M SL N Ln O m M ZI O O C) O m O m G Z3 M IM- M M N M N M c M W N C L C N v C L C N C N N u C ZZ C l.1 N C 7 N uN N C1 O! '� h -W C.S 'O C.) O C O -6 C O C O C Vi O C Vi O C A a v E L m E v m E m L m E An An > > > m E m E p- v m ai + � o a T o N I, O >,cfl p +� +C E EoO O1 atT, +ma�i.O +mm N O LO m LLL p � � QN m M t t J Q Q Mv) � — � ¢ CCO1 T T mO � O � H � -0 LL a O - L v i- 0 v v a+ >.•i O1 H O1 E N � t n > o m 2o � Qti Om L L Wn _W m M I- - Ln W "' N N n. <n y > y <n Q r > yr > <n m� i `jJO O X � E E E E E E Q m Q m CLm CLm CL CD CDti CD CD m i m o 0 0 0 0 0 H V O M O O O cL O O O O O O j L •� 61 d' N N N W Wn 61 to 61 N m Wn m N d. v> v> v> v> w w N w N C y 0 0 0 0 0 o o O - V) N :F+ Q. Q Q T T T p m p m L CL O1 CL O1 CL O1 -a O1 -a v fl E v fl E T > C T > C > C Ln C C N C C Q a u Q a u a u i5 m O i5 m O 0 N � O a Q ¢ Q ¢ Q ¢ Q N ILL m ILL CL d! ^ O1 L ^ O1 L bz 0 bD v N C C p O L M - am0 O0) O -O O! y0 O! " Q wv vCO 0 .' O m 0 .' O V - E F -0 E L� v L2 p - -0 C >T C C >T ! O m p 1 O uQmm p Q 0- (n Q J 0- Q � m m = 57 m QL U a 0 Q i 0 0, 0, c o Q.O tD O �E !E *' U p 0 0) -W m Q m y m y -W o �o u a � a a p O O ¢Q E O p 2 p L p L GL O Q Q 1- J v U- 1- iL to iL o C) CN O T v N G:` E m O "• •t0 m h N >O Q O h E E mm O aA QuLn b y E CD i LO M / O Q0 I� N 41 u u u y u O1 O1 O1 CL O! O! O! Q M p o E CD v C _ rn v N O N .� C) N 41 1- 01 r/ LL CD > LL > l ', �J III Y E @ Q Q ) ) CL 1n V o 0 0 0 � 0 0 Oj L •� 61 to O LY) N 61 to ath w w w c a 0 0 0 0 :F+ j, 4.0 j L T % Q. Q C O O L v •i N F v C Q O 7� =3 N S ui > Q m ou 0 M y C a� a O a•' 0 m O v a u d " u [2 T T d W Q Q •i O C! N N v ) Q) C v >, i v v co: *Z- 43) a>'i o = O 01 : o C Q C. 0 m m 0 H v> 57v z vv = 57 o _ a 0 a- T O m N O T i Q i1 O <L w u m y N T Y m o m C v v v +� 0 0 o vLL a w > > 0 V II II IIII II IIIIIIIII. ,..... /.. ,III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR rend Ana IIs To assess how efficiently Key West Transits up p[ies fixed-route transit service and how effectively those services meet the needs of the area, a trend analysis of critical. performance indicators and measures was conducted to examine the performance of its fixed-route services over a five-year period. To complete this trend analysis,data from the Florida Transit Information System (FTIS)were used, including the most recent validated NTD data for transit agencies in the U.S.As 2018 data were stiii not available from FTIS,data from KWT were obtained and used for 2018. Using the same measures used for the system trend analysis, a peer system review analysis also was conducted and summarized,followed by a trend analysis for KWT.This compares various KWT fixed- route performance characteristics to a group of selected transit agency peers using the most complete and recent national transit data at the time of this analysis,which included 2017 NTD data. lils'6l,ys'is indicators and ME'.s's,,iI"es Various performance measures are used to present the data that relate to overall system performance.Three categories of indicators and performance measures were analyzed for the trend and peer analysis of the existing transit service: • Performance Indicators-quantity of service supply, passenger and fare revenue generation, and resource input • Effectiveness Measures-extent to which the service is effectively provided • Efficiency Measures-extent to which cost efficiency is achieved The trend analysis is organized by type of measure or indicator and includes statistics,figures, and tables to illustrate KWT's performance over the past five years.This analysis includes statistics that summarize selected system performance indicators,effectiveness, and efficiency measures for the five-year period. The summaryfindings of the trend analysis are presented by indicator in Table 3-5, and a detailed summary of the results is provided in Appendix A. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-11 195 of 40L2941 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Table 3-6: Key West Fixed-Route Trend Analysis,2014-2018 Indicator/ %Change Desired Measure 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (2014- Status l Trend' 2018) General Indicators Passenger Trips 358,475 342,583 316,162 309,178 619,261 72.7% III III Service Area Population 33,240 34,198 34,684 35,394* 36,104* 8.6% Service Area Population 1,838 1,891 1,918 1,966 2,006 9.1% 7111 7111 Density Revenue Miles 604,459 601,466 568,901 562,474 675,232 11.7% Revenue Hours 36,283 35,906 37,595 36,127 51,337 41.5% III III Total Operating Expense $2,510,466 $2,467,112 $3,018,623 $3,477,633 $3,652,463 45.5% Vehicles Operated in Max Service 6 6 8 8 20 233.3% III III Effectiveness Measures Revenue Miles 18.18 17.59 16.40 15.58 18.70 2.8% 7111 7111 per Capita Passenger Trips 10.78 10.02 9.12 8.74 17.15 59.0% per Capita Passenger Trips 9.88 9.54 8.41 8.56 12.06 22.1% III III per Revenue Hour Average Age of Fleet(in 11.00 9.06 8.78 8.23 6.68 -39.3% years) Efficiency Measures Operating Expense per Capita $75.52 $72.14 $87.03 $97.41 $101.16 33.9% Operating Expense per $7.00 $7.20 $9.55 $11.15 $5.90 15.8% Passenger Triprr Operating Exp.per Revenue Mile $4.15 $4.10 $5.31 $6.13 $5.41 30.2% dif Operating Expense $69.19 $68.71 $80.29 $95.43 $71.15 2.8% per Revenue Hour Farebox Recovery(%) 21.27 23.49 16.17 13.74 11.41 -46.4% Average Fare $1.49 $1.69 $1.54 $1.53 $0.67 -55.0% I11111 III `201 d anti SerWce Area Popufeatron numbers were based onedo°tar fo 20..F3-2t016.. tatcros as.stped only if trend is outside one stoncdrarrel edeviatr,on of tree d avernge,., �0-euredUr dforgenereadantkatorsb,aseodonexpancingtransrtsystemn. "source.,,NTD,FPS. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-12 196 of 40L2942 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR • General Indicators-Aii genera[indicators have been increasing over the five-year anaiysis period. Passenger trips increased the most, by 73%, primariiy due to adding the Duvai Loop to the system.This addition aiso increased operating costs.Overaii, an increasing number of peopie in the city are using KWT services, and more is service being suppiied to keep up with growing demand. • Effectiveness Measures-Aii effectiveness measures have increased since 2014 except for average fleet age. Due to the purchase of more than a dozen new buses in the iast five years, the average age of the fleet has decreased,indicating a growing fleet of vehicies to keep up with the growing demand.The upward trend of revenue mites per capita, passenger trips per capita, and passenger trips per revenue hour indicate more consumption of service. • Efficiency Measures-Aii operating expense metrics for KWT increased over the five-year period,except for operating expense per passenger trip (-15.8%). Increasing operating expense per capita,operating expense per revenue mite, and operating expense per revenue hour combined with a steadiiy deciining farebox recovery ratio indicate that KWT's operating costs continue to outpace ridership growth. .:I II. II.Re\ail In a�y it A peer system review was conducted to assess how KWT compares to simiiar/peer transit agencies. The peer review anaiysis,when combined with the trend anaiysis of an overaii transit performance evaivation, provides an exceiient starting point for understanding the efficiency and effectiveness of a transit system. Peer Sys'tern Se1.ection Methodol,ogy Afixed-route peer system seiection was conducted using 2017 NTD data avaiiabie in the FTIS database,the most recent data avaiiabie for aii reported systems.The 2017 data for aii systems reported in the NTD were then compared with 2018 data for KWT. Instead of comparing the other agency 2017 data to 2017 data for KWT,2018 data were used due to the significant difference in ridership,service suppiy, and costs in 2018 for KWT due to the impiementation of the Duvai Loop. The pooi of possibie peers was assessed and subsequentiy scored through an objective assessment of nine standard variabies,inciuding the foiiowing: • Geography(southeastern US) • Average speed (revenue mites/revenue hours) • Passenger trips • Revenue mites • Service area popuiation • Service area popuiation density City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-13 197 of 40L2943 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS • Total operating expense • Vehicles operated in maximum service • Revenue hours The peers were first selected based on geographic location (southeastern states), inciudingAiabama, Arkansas, Florida,Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina,South Carolina, Tennessee,Texas,and Virginia. Fixed-route systems operating in these states were added to the pool of possible peers and were analyzed based on the eight remaining criteria described previously.A potential peer received 1.0 points when one of the eight criteria was within 1 standard deviation of KWT's performance value and 0.5 points for each criterion that fell within 2 standard deviations of KWT's value. Table 3-6 shows the final set of peers selected using the methodology summarized above.These peers were then used for the peer system review analysis summarized in the remainder of this section. Table 3-7:Selected Peer Systems for Key West Transit Peer Review Analysis Agency Name Location Richmond County Transit Department(RCT) Augusta,GA Beaumont Municipal Transit(BMT) Beaumont,TX City of Fairfax CUE Bus(CUE) Fairfax,VA Midland-Odessa Urban Transit District(EZ Rider) Midland,TX Bay Town Trolley(BTT) Panama City, FL Peer Review Anal,ysis &.iI"nI"Inary The results of the peer review analysis of KWT's fixed-route bus service is shown in Table 3-7. It shows the findings by key indicators/measures in terms of their deviation above or below the peer group mean and a general assessment of the result. • General Performance Indicators- KWT scored above the peer mean in all general performance measures,with the exception of service area population and service area population density.Scoring above the peer mean by various distances in passenger trips, revenue miles, revenue hours,and vehicles operated during maximum service indicate that KWT supplies more service than the rest of its peers.Although KWT scored above the peer mean in total operating expense (5.8%), it has the [east variance of all the general performance measures from the peer mean. • Effectiveness Measures- KWT scored below the peer mean on passenger trips per revenue hour(-11.2%) and average age of fleet.This suggests that service consumption is less than typically experienced in terms of frequency but is serving the population as a whole. KWT scored below the peer mean for the average age of fleet due to its recent purchase of four 2018 buses and the fact that 68%of its fleet is still within FTA useful years measures. • Efficiency Measures- KWT scored below peer means on all efficiency measures except for operating expense per capita. Its farebox recovery is 35.5%below the peer mean,indicating City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-14 198 of 40L2944 III. ...... /. ,.IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII KEY CONNED MNS that fares do not cover as much of operation expenses as the peer systems.This maybe partiaiiy due to cower average fares,which area pproxim ate[y 33.2%below the peer mean average. Table 3-8: Key West Transit Fixed-Route Peer Review Analysis,2017 Indicator/Measure Key West Transit Assessment %from Mean General Indicators Passenger Trips 10.4% Good Service Area Population -60.5% Service Area Population Density -40.9% Revenue Miles 16.3% Good Revenue Hours 20.3% Good Total Operating Expense 5.8% Can Improve Vehicles Operated During Max Service 62.2% Good Effectiveness Measures Revenue Miles per Capita 86.4% Good Passenger Trips per Capita 61.2% Good Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour -11.2% Can Improve Average Age of Fleet(in years) -2.7% Good Efficiency Measures Operating Expense per Capita 60.9% Can Improve Operating Expense per Passenger Trip -9.6% Good Operating Expense per Revenue Mile -10.6% Good Operating Expense per Revenue Hour -12.9% Good Farebox Recovery(%) -35.5% Can Improve Average Fare -33.2% Can Improve Source:NTD FTIS City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 3-15 199 of 40L2945 II IIIIIIIII Section, 4: ll°)UbIhIc II IIII III The purpose of this section is to review the public involvement activities undertaken for Key Connections and summarize the key findings from each of the events. Public involvement efforts provide critical support and the basis for the developing the 10-yeartransit needs in the community by obtaining information to ascertain community perceptions and expectations on local transit services.To guide the public involvement activities, KWT first prepared a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) that describes all outreach activities to be undertaken during the development of the TDP.The activities included in the PIP provide numerous opportunities for involvement by the general public and representatives of local agencies and organizations.A copy of the PIP developed for Key Connections is included in Appendix C. u Ih it : II lin v o ki e im in t, ...IL.. Ih in itq u Numerous public involvement techniques were used in the public involvement process to engage a full range of community stakeholders and facilitate their active participation in the plan development process.The public involvement techniques can be organized into two major categories. Direct and indirect, as shown in Figure 4-1. Figure 4-1: Public Involvement Techniques �IAWGi uu Direct Involvement Information n Techniques �' �°. Distribution T-echn q ues Activities that directly engage the public and stakeholders in"hands-on" The use of materials or methods to inform the workshops and/or discussion about the general public and stakeholders about the project,such as one house public project,including TDP branding,social media workshops,stakeholder interviews,rider outreach,website content,emails,and other and non-rider surveys in both printed materials such as fact sheets,fliers, and!online media,and presentations to elected officials. presentation boards,and media releases. The remainder of this section outlines the public involvement activities completed for Key Connections. It Then provides detailed summarizes of the findings from these outreach activities in both written and graphical formats to paint a complete picture of the desires and vision of the City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-1 200 of 40L2946 III. ...... /. ,.IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII KEY CONNED MNS community for the city's transit services going forward.The community desires and the input on vision for transit derived from these activities wiii be used to develop and also evacuate the 10-year transit priorities for the City of Key West. u ni ni a ry of II West, IL IIr n s it t, IP u bh C II ui vi Zvi uiii ui t, C tat vi it,it As mentioned previously,several public involvement techniques and activities were used in the Key Connections process to ensure the opportunity for a range of community stakeholders to actively participate in plan development.These activities and techniques are summarized in greater detail in the following sections.A summary of the participation by outreach event is provided in Table 4-1. Table 4-1:TDP Public Involvement Summary Outreach Activity Date Participants Interviews Community Stakeholders December 2018-February 2019 13 KWT Bus Operators March 2019 9 Total 22 Surveys On-Board Survey January 2019 1,013 Public Input Survey January 2019-March 2019 110 Alternatives Survey May 2019-June 2019 220 Total 1,343 Public Workshops Phase I,Workshop#1 March 4,2019 12 Phase I,Workshop#2 March 5,2019 35 Phase 11,Workshop#1 May 28,2019 95 Phase 11,Workshop#2 May 29,2019 80 Total 222 Discussion Group Workshops Business and Economic Development Discussion March 5,2019 11 Group Social Services Discussion March 6,2019 8 Group Total 19 Other Media Email January 2019-May 2019 55 Facebook February 2019-June 2019 Many Websites February 2019-June 2019 Many Total 55 Total Participants 1,661- 'Total does not include Facebook and website engagements. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-2 201 of 40L2947 III. ...... /. ,. II IIIIIIIII KEY CONNED MNS :)r'o. Ct Ilse\ail IlMeet"higs Several project review meetings/conference calls were held to help guide the overall TDP update effort. Review team members included KWDoT staff and representatives from various departments of the City of Key West. • Meeting#1-On November 15,2018,a video conference meeting was held with KWT staff and representatives from Budget, Engineering, and other City departments.The meeting also functioned as the kick-off meeting for the project and included discussions on overall objectives for the TDP, review of the project schedule including future meetings, upcoming public outreach activities,and various data needs. • Meeting#2-An in-person meeting was held on March 5,2019, at the Key West Transit facility at 5701 College Road to review the schedule for upcoming public outreach activities and discuss current TDP priorities and expectations for the development of alternatives. • Meeting#3-Another in-person meeting was held at the Key West Transit facility during the Phase II of the TDP outreach process to review the 10-year draft needs and obtain any additional input on the needs. In addition,the plan for the outreach events was discussed and materials reviewed. Data needs to develop the financial plan for the TDP also was discussed at the meeting. • Conference Calls-Several conference calls with members of KWT staff were conducted as needed throughout the projects timeframe to coordinate on various components of the TDP. t,a <e II o�d e I I in t;e ry'il One-on-one stakeholder interviews provide an effective forum to gather input from key leaders from agencies and the general community concerning the vision for public transportation in their community. Interviews were conducted from December 2018 to February 2019.Table 4-2 provides a summary of the individuals contacted and interviewed as part of this outreach effort. Table 4-2: Stakeholder Information Name Organization Title Terri Johnston City of Key West Mayor Billy Wardlow City Commission,City of Key West Commissioner Greg Davila City Commission,City of Key West Commissioner Mary Lou Hoover City Commission,City of Key West Commissioner Clayton Lopez City Commission,City of Key West Commissioner Sam Kaufman City Commission,City of Key West Commissioner Manuel Castillo Key West Housing Authority Executive Director Vanessa Naranjo Health Council of South Florida Office Administrator Roger McVeigh Parking Alternative Transportation Group Chairman Maureen Dunleavy Westcare(CTC for Monroe County) Area Director Virginia Panico Key West Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President Rita Irwin Tourist Development Council Chairman Eric Detwiler Alternative Parking Transportation Group Member City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-3 202 of 40L2948 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED M I interview S,, IIII II IIII 1 a Icy A list of questions and discussion topics was developed forthe interviews, and each stakehoiderwas provided the same questions and topics.The input received duringthese interviews was reviewed, and majorthemes were identified and are summarized in the following sections. General Surr mory • Overall,the stakeholders expressed the need for more frequent transit services and more reliable service to help serve residents and tourists. • Most stakeholders were in agreement that transit could be a meaningful solution to the major parking and traffic problems plaguing the island. • Stakeholders mentioned frequently that they would like to see fewer cars on the island and more alternative options such as walking and bicycling in combination with transit.They commented that it was important that transit become a part of and fit into the island culture. Improvements to Existing Service Some stakeholders were current riders of the transit system, and all stakeholders agreed that KWT needs more frequent service to attract more riders and support the current ridership base. • More frequentservice-Stakeholders agreed that KWT needs more frequent service,citing the success of the Duval Loop.Also mentioned was that infrequent service is inconvenient for workers and commuters, and,with a booming tourism industry,it is also necessary for tourists to get around the island and not have to rely on having a personal automobile. • Route Structure-All stakeholders commented that the current KWT routes are very long and cover the same area.Although the routes overlap, it was mentioned that the service is still too infrequent and extended. • Direct routes-Stakeholders agreed that KWT could be more efficient and direct by having more routes like the Duval Loop. Itwas frequently mentioned thatthe Duval Loop had high ridership due to its concise and frequent nature.Stakeholders also mentioned the need for more connectors or loop type fixed-route services throughout the island. • Bus stop placement-Stakeholders commented that bus stops might need to be prioritized and reorganized to help with service efficiency. It was also mentioned that there could possibly be fewer stops on each route, making the service more effective. New ldeoslFy es of Service • Shuttles- KWT currently uses large buses for its routes, and stakeholders commented that using smaller buses may help.They mentioned using these smaller buses or trolleys frequently due to the culture of the island and the narrow streets. Bigger buses could be used on major roads and on routes that would need a higher carrying capacity. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-4 203 of 40L2949 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEC17ONS • Microtransit- Most stakeholders mentioned needing innovative ideas to combat the traffic congestion problems and the growing demand for parking.Solutions included implementing mobility-on-demand solutions for older adults and those who are transportation disadvantaged. • Connections and loops-Stakeholders frequently stated that there is a need to change the style of routing to become a more direct network.Connecting the various parts of the island through more structured service was mentioned by all, and connecting Old Town and Stock Island directly for college students, hospital staff,and tourists was specifically indicated. Copitoonfrastructure Improvements • Transit center or major parking garage-A major concern for stakeholders was relieving traffic congestion and encouraging day-trippers or other tourists to leave their cars off the main corridors of the island. • Bus stop infrastructure-Stakeholders commented that bus stops are not always visible and enhancement could possibly raise awareness of the service. Real-time displays and more benches were mentioned to make the service more attractive. It was also mentioned that dedicated funding and revenue could be brought in from advertising at stops. Fare Policy Ideas • Private partnerships- Partneringwith private hotels that have an established shuttle program and employers that have workers using the service was a high priority for most stakeholders. Fostering relationships with participating entities could support routes that patrons or workers use and would ride with free fares.Stakeholders also mentioned reaching out to developers to incorporate bus stops within their plans for developments. • Free fares-Stakeholders attributed much of the Duval Loop's success to having a free fare. Making all routes free would incentivize using transit for all tourists and to not use cars when visiting and would encourage residents to use the service. Due to the amount of tourism that Key West experiences,stakeholders mentioned having the Tourist Development Council help fund the services. • Taxes-Some stakeholders mentioned implementing or raising taxes to invest in KWT. Making fares for all routes free would require funding support from parking or an extra tax, and there may be support for a tax to fund transit services if it would relieve traffic and parking problems on the island. General Input from Stakeholders • KWT could use a route like the Duval Loop in New Town. • Older adults,tourists, and the transportation disadvantaged use the service more. • Tourists depend on the transit system to sightsee and get to tourist attractions around the island. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-5 204 of 40L2950 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. Ilri�u�V� ,e ai KEY CONNED MNS • More visible bus stop signs are needed to denote where buses stop. • Public transit will be a big help in relieving parking and traffic congestion. • Current fares are reasonable. • Marketing routes like the Duval Loop will help bring awareness to the entire system. • Some workers on the islands have muitipiejobs and cannot use KWT due to infrequent timing. • Land use perhaps should be changed to support transit-oriented developments. del ain d Iy o in IlRidei. ulry ey M,,i s IRider S,,i ry e y A rider survey on-board KWT buses was conducted in January 2019 to collect demographic,travel behavior,and user satisfaction information from current transit riders.Surveys were distributed on ail bus routes for three weekdays and a Saturday(covering 100%of KWT routes).The 17-question survey was distributed to all passengers on the buses on each bus route,the majority of which were via a tablet format. (See Appendix C for a copy of the survey instrument.)The survey was translated into Spanish and Creole for non-English-speaking passengers. It was administered by a team of trained survey personnel who had completed an orientation session that instructed them on their responsibilities and discussed possible issues or concerns that might arise while conducting the su rvey. Survc y Characteristics The survey consisted of questions to identify passenger socio-demographics,travel characteristics, and rider satisfaction, as summarized below. Tiravell CIhlairacteii iwstiics • Method for reaching the bus for this trip • Trip destination for this trip • Number of one-way bus trips typically made per week • Most important reason for riding the bus • Length of time using Key West Transit services • Fare type used • Retrieval method of information relating to bus service Soy*iio_II: ernogirapIhics • Age • Race • Gender • Household income • City residency status City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-6 205 of 40L2951 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS rin C,rov'k,,,.IIn'k,,,.nt Piiioiiifies and Ndel Satlfa.Nll Yx cfio II • Top service improvements • Overall level of satisfaction with Key West Transit S�..s rvey IRe s�,s l t s In total, 1,013 Key West Transit passengers responded to the survey, as shown in Table 4-3.As shown in Table 4-4,on average,728 passengers responded to each question,for a completion rate of 72 percent. Table 4-3:Completed Surveys by Day of Week Day Number Completed Percent Saturday 651 64% Weekday 362 36% Total 1,013 100% Table 4-4: Rate of Responses Received by Question Question# Question Description Responses Received Q1 Route 1,013 100% Q2 Purpose of Trip 918 91% Q3 Method for Reaching Bus 762 75% Q4 Transfer 653 64% Q5 Number of Trips per Week 749 74% Q6 Length of Key West Transit Use 741 73% Q7 Reason for Riding Bus 730 72% Q8 Retrieval Method of Information 711 70% Q9 Fare Type 612 60% Q10 Residence Status 718 71% Q11 Service Improvements 855 84% Q12 Gender 973 96% Q13 Race 737 73% Q14 Age 731 72% Q15 Household Income 496 49% Q16 Overall Satisfaction 713 70% Q17 Comments 257 25% Total Surveys Received 1,013 Average Responses Received for Each Question 728 72% Passenger FrCIVE:'l Characteristics Passengers were asked to identify the purpose of their current trip (Figure 4-2). In total,349 passengers (37%) said work,226 (24%) said sightseeing/attraction, 188 (20%) said sociai/recreation/entertainment, and 122 (13%) said shopping/errands.Travel to medical appointments was noted by 33 passengers(3%) and Other by 28 passengers(3%). City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-7 206 of 40L2952 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Figure 4-2: Purpose of Trip Medi Other,3% cal,3%�, Shopping/errands, 13% Work,37% Social/recreation/ entertainment, � �"' Sightseeing/attractions, 20/o , 24% 'Chart totals will not equate to actual number of total survey responses because respondents were given the opportunity to select more than one trip purpose. Passengers were asked to identify how they arrived at the bus stop for their current trip (Figure 4-3). In total,631 passengers(83%) said they walked or used a wheelchair to reach the stop,52 (7%) used a bicycle,and 25 (3%)were dropped off, and 3 percent rode with someone or drove and parked nearby. Passengers who walked/used a wheelchair, bicycled,or drove and parked also were asked how far they traveled to reach the stop;34 passengers(26%)who walked or used a wheelchair traveled one block,24(19%) traveled three blocks,24 (12%)traveled three blocks, and 9 (6%) traveled four blocks. Figure 4-3: Method for Reaching Bus Drove&parked, / Other,3% Dropped off by 4% friend/family, 3% Bicycled,7% MH I�III�I I���Ir` ��111lllfl, I 26°io walked r� 1block i�i�'jlillll Walked,83/o Passengers were asked if they made a transfer on the trip they were currently on (Figure 4-4). In total, 107 (16%) indicated yes and 546 (84%) indicated no. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-8 207 of 40L2953 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-4:Transfers by Survey Respondents F nT>�ruall,Fo�r��l �u i Passengers were asked how often they used KWT bus services (Figure 4-5). Passengers who generaiiy use the bus on a regular basis (48%,358) said they use it more than 4 days per week,30 percent(221) said as often as they can when on vacation in Key West, 13 percent(48) said 2-3 days per week, and 10 percent(74) said about once per week. Figure 4-5: Number of Trips per Week About 1 day per week,10% 2 or 3 days per week,13% 4 or more days per week,48% / As much as l n when I am on vacation here, 30% To identify the most important reasons why passengers ride the bus,seven choices were provided (Figure 4-6). "Bus more convenient"was cited as the most important reason for 270 riders (37%), and "Car is not avaiiabie" (23%) and "I don't drive/no driver iicense" (17%) aiso were key reasons, foiiowed by"Bus more economical. (14%), "It is free with Park-N-Ride" (4%), "Parking is hard to find/expensive" (3%),and "Traffic is bad" (2%). City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-9 208 of 40L2954 IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNR Figure 4-6: Reason for Riding Bus 4% 3% % Bus Irnore Car ils not I don't drilve/no Bus Irnore It ils free%Mtlh Parlkiing ils 1hard Traffic ils Ikrad colrvelrilelrt avaiHalWe dlrilvelrftelnse econolrrikai Palrlk N Riede to find/expensive Passengers were asked about the iength of time they had been using Key West Transit services. Figure 4-7 shows that the majority of riders, about 30 percent(226 passengers),were first-time users, approximately 28 percent(206 passengers) said more than 2 years,approximately 17 percent(123 passengers) said less than 6 months, and approximately 14 percent said 1-2 years. Figure 4-7: Length Using Key West Transit 6 months to a year,11% L First-time 1 to 2 years, . .rider,30% 14% Less than 6,,,,,,, � / o months, 17/o More than 2 years,28% Passengers were asked which type of fare they usuaiiy pay when they ride the bus. Most passengers (405,66%) paid the MI.cash-fare. Figure 4-8 shows that 153 (25%) paid the full-fare one-way fare, 115 (19%) used a full-fare one-day pass, (14%) used a full-fare seven-day pass,54 (9%) used a full-fare 31- day pass, and 46 (8%) used a seniorfare one-way pass.Senior passes made up 21%of saies and reduced fare made up 13%. In totai,211 passengers took the Duval.Loop, a free route,which is not represented in Figure4-8. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-10 209 of 40L2955 III. ...... /. ,.II IIIIIIIII.IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNS Figure 4-8: Fare 31 "G CY 7%IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1��������f��j���������� III IIIIIIIII.hVm t9t99t9t9tdt9t9td �/®, � 1°///////// may 1 Day One. Way V IIII VIVI Iwll�h �yyyy� (IIIIIIIII F u i i Reduced 1 se iniloir Methods by which passengers received information about KWT bus service (Figure 4-9) inciuded 256 (31%) receiving information from the Key West website,249 (30%)from printed sched u[es, 126 (15%) from Googie,66 (8%)from information provided at transit stations, and 14(2%)from calling KWT. Other sources included posted bus signs/shelters or word of mouth, representing about 15 percent of responses received. Figure 4-9: Method of Receiving Information Calling Key West Transit,2% Printed schedules - 30/® � 1 Transit stations, 8% Improvement Priorities Passengers were asked to indicate the top three service improvements from a list of eight that would make KWT better for their use (Figure 4-10);a ninth selection was available for other improvement priorities not on the list. In total,47 percent said more frequent service on existing routes,22 percent said more weekend service on city routes,9 percent said more benches and shelters at bus stops, and 7 percent said more routes like the Duval Loop. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-11 210 of 40L2956 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR Figure 4-10:Top Three Service Suggestions Metre flreq uelnt service on existing Iro utes NIMENONNNOMEN011111 Moire weelkelnd service on City Iro ute< MONNO I m Metre Ibelnclhes and s1heVtelrs at ILrLus stops w®® Metre Routes 4illke DLuvGa4 L.eefa no Metre P aIrIk IV Ride fGadilitiles with ILrLus access �m Express service e m Metre lbilke racks at lbus stops w®® e Passengers were asked to rate their overaii satisfaction with KWT's services(Figure 4-11). Most gave the highest rating("10",foiiowed by"8" (13%), and "9" (18%).The majority of responses reflected a higher overaii rating of the agency,with an average score of 8.26 out of 10. Figure 4-11: Satisfaction with Key West Transit � W m r � 1a/o Least Satisfied Most Satisfied Passenger`ocio-Demogrophic Information When asked about their residency, most respondents indicated they reside in Key West permanently (46%), approximately 41 percent responded less than six months, and 13 percent said six months to City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-12 211 of 40L2957 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS one year.As shown in Figure 4-12,86% reported their residence as within Key West,8 percent elsewhere, and six percent in Marathon. Figure 4-12: Residency 6 months to 1 Other, year 1 13% Marathon, I��VVVVuuu�� ey We t, r months Less than 6,,, ��r, .. _....:.,,,, 86% 41% Figure 4-13 shows the responses that passengers indicated when asked about household income. In total, 170 (34%) passengers said $15,000 to$24,999, 124(25%) said less than $15,000, 107 (22%) said $25,000 to$49,999 and 95 (19%) said over$50,000. Figure 4-13: Household Income Over$50,000, „ 19% $15,000 to $24,999,34% i $25,000 t om~` r, $49,999, 19% �f� Under$15,000, 25% Passengers were asked to indicate their race from a list of seven choices(Figure 4-14). In total,467 passengers (63%) said they were White,99 (13%) said Other,79 (11%) said American Indian orAiaska Native,and 69 (9%) said Buck or African American.Approximately 54 percentwere male and 46 percent were female (Figure 4-15). City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-13 212 of 40L2958 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-14: Race Native Two or more Hawaiian or dl,iil�ll races,1% other Pacific �11111111��1�11���� Islander, 1% � Asian, 1% Black or African American r American,9% Indian or Alaska Native, Other, 13% 11% .................................................................................................................................................................................... Figure 4-15 shows that 238 (33%)were ages 45-59,223 (31%)were 60-79, 193 (26%)were 25-44,54 (74%) were 18-24, and passengers under age 18 and age 80 years or oider made up 3%. Figure 4-15:Gender and Age Over 80 1% 1% e � j Ulydelr 18 1% j 1% City of Key West TDP Draft Report 4-14 213 of 40L2959 IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNEC17ONS fP�,,i 1)I.i c II ii p�,,i t S�,,i rvey An online public survey was initiated in January 2019 and made available via social media platforms created for the TDP (discussed cater in this section),email blasts,and the KWT website; it was also avai[abie during the public workshops. Periodicaiiy, KWT sent reminders and posted information about compietingthe survey on its social media and online platforms. In total, 14 questions were asked to gather opinions about current services,willingness to use public transit,and the community's transit needs.The survey was also designed to gauge public awareness of transit in Key West and to gather socio-demographic information of survey respondents.A total of 110 surveys were completed. Surramory of Public Input`urvcy Results Survey respondents were asked how much awareness there was about transit and public transportation in the city.The majority responded that awareness was"moderate" (68%). Figure 4-16 shows the remainder of responses from greatest to least, including High (19%), None at all (8%),and Do not know(5%). Figure 4-16: How much awareness is there in the city about transit/public transportation? Moderate MOMMMEMM' . , 1, hflgll7 Mt Noine at A w m Do Inot Iknow Although the 68%of respondents indicated there was only"moderate" awareness of the public transit services, 74 percent said that it must be provided (Figure 4-17).Approximately 18 percent responded that it might be useful,followed by not sure it is useful (4%), and it does not matter to me (4%). As shown in Figure 4-18, respondents were asked about their perception of transit's role in the city. Approximately 40 percent agreed that it was to serve workers and commuters,followed by relieving parking/congestion (31%),serving tourists/visitors (27%),and connecting the islands (2%). City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-15 214 of 40L2960 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-17:What do you think of Key West Transit service? o° % Serve Relieve Serve to urilsts/vilsiltors Connect iis4ands %vorlkers/coirnirn uters parlkiing/congestilon Figure 4-18:What is your perception of transit's role in the city? It does not matter to me,�, Not sure it is 4% useful,4% a It might be useful,18% When asked if traffic congestion is a problem in Key West,99 percent of respondents agreed that it was.As shown in Figure 4-19,41 percent responded that traffic congestion was a problem and that transit would relieve congestion and 37 percent agreed that traffic congestion was a problem and that transit may provide some help.Approximately 20 percent indicated that traffic congestion was a problem and thattransit would help reduce parking demand,and 2 percent did notthink transit would have an effect whether or not they thought traffic congestion was a problem. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-16 215 of 40L2961 II IIIIIIII.IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-19: Is traffic congestion a problem in Key West? What role do you see transit playing alleviating the situation? IIII Yes,It vviH IreVueve congestionNN m Yes,It may provide selrme 1heVfa Yes,iItan✓iiH heVfa IredLuce parlkilingdelrriand Om Yes,It an✓iIVV 1Inave Inca effect 1% Ii It aviH 1have no effect 1% To gauge the perception of respondents,they were asked if they had ever used KWT.As shown in Figure 4-20, approximateiy 64 percent had used it before and 36 percent had not. Figure 4-20: Have you used Key West Transit? U U�UII� Illill IIIIIIII I�, '0i�iil IIi�JJ,111 IIIII IIIIIIIJI��II;III�J IIIIIIIU��f>L�111illll�lll II I��IIIII�Illllllllllllli�'rr��fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIl01���lllllllllllflllllll When asked if they had used any other transportation services in Key West,the most popuiar response was the Conch Tour Train (44%). "Other"services were indicated as the next highest response,foiiowed by the Oid Town Troiiey(21%); no respondents indicated that they used Key West Limo service.When were asked to eiaborate what services when choosing"Other,"the most popuiar responses inciuded Uber,Lyft,or taxi. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-17 216 of 40L2962 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-21: Have you used any of the following other services in Key West? Conch Touir TIra n Othelr Ud Town TIroVVey m Key West Lilirrlo 0% Respondents were asked if there was a need for additionai transit services in Key West.As shown in Figure 4-22, approximateiy 84 percent agreed that there was and 16 percent did not. Figure 4-22: Do you think there is a need for additional transit services in Key West? �d Respondents were asked to indicate what improvements they wouid Re to see in Key West if additionai services were needed (Figure 4-23).The top three responses were more frequent service on city routes (24%), more routes iike the Duvai Loop (21%),and more park-and-ride faciiities with bus access (15%).Other responses inciuded more frequent service on the Lower Keys Shuttie (8%), more weekend service on city routes (8%), more benches and sheiters (7%), cater evening service on a certain route(7%),express service (7%), and other(3%). Respondents were asked what other improvements they wouid Hke to see if they indicated that option; responses inciuded a route in New Town, a Stock Isiand route, and an Oid Town route. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-18 217 of 40L2963 IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-23:What are the top three improvements you would most like to see? Moire f rquentserviiceonCity Iroutes NNONNINNE , . I . Mere Iroutes Villke DuvaV Loofa MMMMOMMil", Metre Park IV Ride faciii1itiles with Ihus access MEN==,, Mere flreq cent service on I_ean✓er Keys slhuttVe o Mere weelkend service on City IroLutes w Mere Ihus Ibenches and slhe4ters m V Later evening service on a certain route Express service Othelr m i Respondents were asked to provide socio-demographic information, inciuding residence status,age, and income.As shown in Figure 4-24, respondents indicated how many months of the year they reside in Key West or the Lower Keys.Approximateiy 24 percent responded that they were there for iess than six months, nine percent indicated six months to the whoie year, and approximateiy two-thirds(66%) indicated that they were permanent residents. If they indicated that they were a permanent resident, they were asked to provide their ZIP code.Approximateiy 93 percent iived in Key West or on Stock Isiand,5 percent on Big Pine Key, and 2 percent on Cudjoe Key(Figure 4-25). Figure 4-24: How many months of the year do you reside in Key West/Lower Keys? 6 months to 1 year,9% W i/ Less than 6 months,24% Permanent resident,66% City of Key West TDP Draft Report 4-19 218 of 40L2964 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-25: If a permanent resident,where do you live? Middie Torch Key, Summeriand Key, Big Pine Key I Cudjoe Key, and 043) Sugarioaf Key(33042) rj Key West, Stock Isiand i�„l�� ';i and Big Coppitt Key (33040) When asked about their age, more than haif of respondents(55%) indicated that they were ages 41- 60, approximateiy 30 percent said over 60, 13 percent said 25-40,2 percent said 18-24, and none said under 18 (Figure 4-26). Figure 4-26:Age 18 to 24 years, 2% y 25 to 40 years,"', 13% /j 1- Over 60oy�ears,,,,,,,, 41 to 60 years, / 31 As shown in Figure 4-27,the majority(58%) indicated their annuai househoid income [eve[as over $75,000.Other responses inciude $30,000 to$74,999 (35%) and seven percent indicated under $29,999. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-20 219 of 40L2965 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Figure 4-27: Household Income Under$29,999, 7% t i $30,000 Over$75,000, ///////���iii////////////i $74,999,35% 58% When asked what a reasonabie one-way fare to pay for transit is,the most popuiar response was $1.01 to$2.00 (37%).Other responses were$0.50 to$1.00 (31%),free (17%), $2.01 to$3,00 (13%), and more than $3.00 (2%),as shown in Figure 4-26. Figure 4-28:What do you think is a reasonable one-way fare to pay for transit? More than $3.00,2% $2.01 to$3.00, Il lll, 13% Free,17%. , // ........... $0.50 to$1.00, 31% VF $1.01 to$2.00, 37% Passengers were asked to rate characteristics of service; Figure 4-29 shows the findings. Frequency, dependabiiity of buses, and the convenience of routes were the top priorities. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-21 220 of 40L2966 IIII II III. II IIIIIIIII. IIII UUUUUUUUUUUIUIIIIIUIIII�IUIUUI I�� �� %/,//// ��I�� /„/%%/ KEY CONNED MNS Figure 4-29: Importance of Service Aspects Frequency IIII�I�Jp�II))IJI�I���III�III��UI���II���II�II�III�I�II�IIII��II�I II�III��UI�II��II����))�II��II�I�I�IIIII�IIII��IIIUIII�I�I�I�I����II�II��I���I IIII��IUII��III�IUIII�IUIUIII��UI.IU11���11I��1��II��UI��UI��°'.Yy 'y . . . . . . . . . . . /. /j /O ,; Depel rdalkrit4itty of Ikrases ����UU�IUI�JUIUIJ�J���U��UIUUJUIUI�UU�IUI�JUIUIJ�J���U��UIUUJUIUI�UU�IUI�JUIUIJ�J���U����U��U��U��U��U��U�uI VUI IIIIfI� �/���%i ����,��/¢s� o IIII Y / IIII I Cc�Irlvelrlilelrlce of Irc�utes IIII I Safety/eculrilty on Ikru mI 0lololi I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIdiM1iliM1ihIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIiM1iiiM1iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIdIiiiM1iiiM1lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Days of selrvllce J�I�IUI�JUUIJ�J�J�U�I�IUIUUUUIUI�I�IUI�JUUIJ�J�J�U�I�IUIUUUUIUI�I�IUI�JUUIJ�J�J�U�I�J�J�J�J��� � /////////� %//// ,,,,,, IIIII�I�I�IIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, , // Houlrs of selMce Safety/secu rlty at lbus stops II IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII pm I VI IVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV� ///�a .�„s ,;;,��-.. U s e Ir f Iril e In d 4 it In e s of Ikr u s it In f o Irlrrl a t II o In �JpJ�J��I�p�I1VIV�IJyy�lUu�I1VIV�Jyy�lUu�I1VIV�IJyy�lUu�I1VIV�Jyy�lUu�I1VIV�IJyy�IlU11VViyi w�yl VON�V VON�V VON������ ;r/�������/ ���/� � o / MYJ� LVC��7Vty L IIIIII IIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII(IIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII r�rr�r r�r r�rr�r �ryry�rrff(//r�j�/���� / `PC�Y of lb us iroute rY fllrrr atorY A IIII I IIIIIIIIIIII IIII I IIIIIIIIIIII IIII VV IIII III / //%/ "'` / Velh7 e C VE:arYVIIress and co rrlfo rt Bus dlrilvelrcoulrtesy IIII g' fl lmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu //ieai /a ° UII I�luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu / ///o/ „%y I..ocatilolrr of Ikrus stops pI (IIIII I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu� Si/vi _ /��/%,; Bus stop dealrrkness and coirrlfoirt ...... . . � � ....... (IIIII (IIIII IIII I I I uuuuuuuuuppuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuppuuuuuuuum!!I / //i�,/ '... AccessulNHty of Ikrus passe V����������I����UI�������11�������I����UI�������JJ���yll➢1Y�,�il,,, ,,, Chu a ���������� /����������%,,,,,, � /� ,,,i,,, o TIraveV tulrrlc on Ikrus imiN , Cost of iris&ng the Ikr u s pl�� i�uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu /// � /i//iiiii o (IIIIIIIII Very Irmfaelrtaint Sornevvlhat Ilanfaelrtaint Neutlra� I Net Ilrrlfaelrtaint IIIIIIII Ne OPa inileln ���Ihase II Outreach Il:Iuulbhc wal<shops To identifytransit needs in the communit and Y how KWT can improve its services in the next 10 years,two pubiic workshops were held in March un%urru1.46wwIPwr7ru�� �'�,,,� 2019. Each included instruments to gather general attitudes regarding transit in Key West ��, and desired service and facility improvements yii�� YI 1 to the current transit system.The open house- style workshops allowed City transit staff to p Y engage with members of the public who could come and go as they pleased. P�"Ib1. c Workshop #:1 The first public workshop was held at the City Commission Chambers Courtyard in Old Town from 3:00-5:00 PM on March 4,2019. It was attended by 12 participants who asked questions and provided input,with 9 completing a tabiet-based online survey. Figure 4-30 is a summary of the priorities expressed at the first workshop on future transit services in Key West. Participants indicated more City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-22 221 of 40L2967 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS routes iike the Duvai Loop, more park-and-ride faciiities with bus access, and more frequent service on city routes as the most important improvements in Key West for the next 10 years. Figure 4-30:What service improvements would make KWT better for you to use? Moire Ireutes 4illke Duva Loop OMMIMMONNOMMOM. , Metre Park IV Ride faciii1itiles with Ilrus access .®® J Metre fq � y Ireutesmommommm �®® � Ire ue�Int service on hilt Express service = Metre flrequelnt service on I_ean✓elr Keys S1huttVe w m Ater evening service on a certain iroute O .. wm I Metre weelkelnd service on City Ireutes °m Otlhelr Metre Ilrus Ibelnclhes and s1heVtelrs Pit, l)HC WorkShop #2 The second pubiic workshop was heid at the City Commission Chambers Courtyard from 2:00-4:00 PM on March 5,2019. It was attended by 35 participants who asked questions and provided input,with 27 compieting surveys. Figure 4-31 is a summary of the improvement priorities expressed at the March 5 workshop.The top three service improvements were more routes iike the Duvai Loop, more frequent service on city routes, and cater evening service on a certain route. Particuiar routes mentioned for cater service inciuded the Duvai Loop and in the New Town area.This echoes previous workshops that indicated more service suppiy and more frequent service. Figure 4-31:What three service improvements would make KWT better for you to use? I Metre Ireutes 4ulke L�uva� Loopm Metre flrequelnt service on City Ireutes WMIMMommomm"NO, m Ater evening service on a certain iroute IIIIIIII I m vii Metre Park IV Ride facuVuties with Ilrus access mmmm W®® 111 Metre Ilrus Ibelnclhes and s1heVtelrs Moire firequent service �n Keys S"uttile Moire weelkelnd service on City Ireutes r Express service w m YI p Othelr w m City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-23 222 of 40L2968 III. ...... /. ,. II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNS Nscussion Group WoIrl III Ip M,,is ness and Econornic Deve1,opirrielit Disc�,,ission Grm,lp A discussion group workshop was heid with business ieaders and hotei managers to gauge existing and future pubiic transportation needs in Key Weston March 5,2019,from 10:00 AM to 12:00 pm at the KWT Conference Room of KWDoT facility at 5701 Coiiege Road in Stock Island.Attendees included representatives of the Key West Chamber of Commerce and Tourist Development Council,former members of the Alternative Parking Transportation Group, and representatives from Florida Keys Community College,the Tropical Soup Group,the Lower Keys Medical Center, and the Historic Florida Keys Foundation,who participated in a discussion for KWT to learn more about the public transportation needs forthe people and organizations in Key West.There were 12 attendees at this workshop, including other stakeholders and staff from various City agencies. Each attendee was provided with meeting materials and took part in viewing a detailed project presentation,which was followed by productive discussion session. X'61M wraarx+w ar irrrrrrrrrrn/aaiaaavvviiiiioiyjrininmm�„r„, !' f J %' J/ / a y /a Key Input received from and needs identified by workshop attendees included the following: • A major concern of discussion group members was traffic and connectivity issues due to the construction of Cow Keys Bridge (connecting Key West to Stock Island and rest of the Keys), which will make traffic issues worse on already-congested US-1. Participants were very interested in using transit as a solution/remedy to relieve the congestion and also thought this alternative could translate into permanent ridership. • Another priority for the group was to make routes shorter,easy to understand,and more frequently available so residents and tourists can to use them for work,shopping,sightseeing, recreation, and other purposes more easily. • The group was in agreement that larger buses should be used only on major arterials and/or for more popular/high ridership routes(such as Duval Loop) to help with capacity issues.They recommended that the smaller buses be implemented in areas with narrower roads and low ridership routes orwhen there is less demand fortransit,such as at night. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-24 223 of 40L2969 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONN'CCMNR • Consideration of fare free service was discussed to make the routes more attractive and encourage tourists to not drive.Some stakeholders indicated the need for the whole system to be free to entice residents and visitors who have not used transit. • Discussions included the need for and importance of local. businesses providing bus passes to workers and hotels providing visitors with bus passes. • Awareness about transit in the city was discussed; ail agreed that more awareness and marketing may help residents,workers, and visitors understand the convenience of using transit in the city and help them switch to this mode when possible. • Participants agreed that the location and number of bus stops needs to be addressed.They felt that there was an excess of bus stops that was slowing down the system that could be either eliminated or reallocated to areas that may need it. • Most participants were not in favor of raising taxes, but agreed that there could be revenue from private partnerships,tourism fees,or parking. The following is feedback from participants who chose to complete the survey: • The top three choices indicated by participants in the Business and Economic Development Discussion Group were more routes like the Duval Loop (22%), more frequent service on city routes (22%),and later evening service on a certain route (12%). Participants who responded that they would like to see later evening service on certain routes indicated the Duval Loop. • Implementing more capital improvements such as bus benches, bus shelters, and park-and- ride locations were supported by discussion group participants. Participants commented that more bus infrastructure could be placed at popular bus stops on frequently used routes such as the Duval Loop. • Approximately 82 percent of participants responded that they thought KWT must be provided. When asked about the most important aspects of choosing to ride KW, participants said frequency of service and convenience. Socia1. Services Agencies Disc�,,ission Gro�,,ip Another discussion group workshop was held with area social service and workforce development agency stakeholders to gauge existing and future public transportation needs in Key West on March 6, 2019,from 10:00-11:30 AM at the same previous location.Attendees included representatives from Westcare, Key West Housing,the Florida Keys Coalition, Habitat for Humanity,Vocational Rehabilitation services, Monroe County Social Services,and Key West Community Services participated, in addition to City of Key West staff.There were eight attendees at this workshop, and each was provided with meeting materials and received a brief project overview presentation. Input received and needs identified from workshop attendees included the following: City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-25 224 of 40L2970 III. ...... /. ,. II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNS • Need a reiiaWe schedule for workers;if there is an unexpected decay or shift in schedule, it can affect someone getting to work. • KWT helps with parking congestion but could help more.The service is overall underused. • KWT should establish a presence at hotels to increase ridership by tourists. • More frequent service would be helpful for workers and tourists. • Congestion becomes an even bigger problem during Fall when residents return from their northern homes. • KWT should advertise more to senior centers, as most older adults do not have cars or cannot drive and need transportation. More free ride days should also be implemented to help with visibility and increase regular ridership. • Service is needed in the New Town area—a loop or a short and concise route. • There is a need to coordinate more with Miami-Dade County to help obtain passes for connections via MDT 301 route.Currently, passengers can purchase passes only in Miami- Dade County. The following is feedback from participants who chose to take a survey: • More weekend service on city routes(20%), more park-and-ride facilities with bus access (17%), and more frequent service on city routes(17%) were the top choices indicated by social service agency participants. Participants commented that if there was more service supply, tourists would not feel the need to rent a car or those who arrived by car could park it at the park-and-ride for the extent of their stay.Overall, participants emphasized that transit could be a solution to the traffic and parking problem in Key West. • Echoing the other discussion group workshop, participants agreed that more bus stop infrastructure such as benches and shelters was needed on more popular routes.Adding these amenities and making the stops attractive could aid persuading tourists to use transit. • ACC participants indicated that KWT must be provided.Safety and security on buses and at bus stops were the most popular responses when participants were asked about important aspects of riding KWT. Citly conlnlissbn V/ it In it In g Irl" h 14 A transit visioning workshop was held with Key West City Commissioners on March 5,2019,to provide an overview of the TDP process and an update on the outreach and work to date and to engage the Commissioners for input and guidance for the future of KWT and the services it provides in the city for the next 10 years. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-26 225 of 40L2971 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONN'CCMNR Aii Commissioners and the Mayor were present and were asked a series of questions to gauge what aspects of transit they beiieved were important,where improvements were needed, and the future of the system.The following is a summary of the discussion from the meeting: • ACC participants agreed that transit services in the city could be improved further to benefit the residents,workers, and tourists. • Aii indicated that a top concern was traffic congestion and parking. • The Commissioners agreed that the Duval Loop has been very successful and agreed that KWT should consider similar efforts,as that approach can help grow the system and improve KWT routes (Figure 4-32). Figure 4-32: Policy Questions on Vision i . What should we consi(ler as,we PdNcy plan for bus service llntIfhe Questions lily+�as� � Bons ti Vision ovio v.vmi((,,,h a>wvv, l� oul t //j /i rrrrrrrrr rri • It was also agreed that transit services in the city can help service industry workers with more frequent and dependable transit,including service on holidays,to help them access work and help increase ridership. • There was support for the development of an intermodai center on Stock Island to facilitate as a park-and -ride and as a transfer station. • When asked about innovative approaches or how technology could play a role in advancing the system (see Figure 4-33), it was suggested that there should be Wi-Fi on all buses and at stops and that there should be real-time information displayed on the app and at key location stops to make it easier for riders.Another suggestion was to increase the bike-carrying capacity on buses to aid with first/last mile connections. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-27 226 of 40L2972 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. / /. KEY CONNED MNS Figure 4-33: Policy Questions on Innovation • What o a a��r��r r�altii�a� j ✓r�a��i�les)doyou Policythink should be, considered? Questions n Innovation • What rote do you walnt �kN' �XI��+Cti��+�,7oiAa�laa✓,��:�to ' r / i �� �� ... ��� ��i rill///iiiiiiiiiiii r • When asked about partnerships and funding to implement new or enhanced services (Figure 4-34),the Commissioners indicated that Monroe County should be a partner, as should hotels and other tourist service entities to help promote leaving cars and using transit. Figure 4-34: Policy Questions on Partnerships&Funding I 1 p • What can / provide innovative ways IF)61icy improve mobility and expand services? Questions ��� I�r ��, I Ahead, •Uiowvirouhyoucreate � �nraxnYay;;,tofimphenven tnew 4/ 00 //,/ vr,r writ/////%%//%////% r/ii//// ,//,rr %%///// a s 0 I IIra t II- II Iin te ry ews As ambassadors of KWT, bus operators have the most opportunity for and the greatest depth of contact with existing patrons on a day-to-day basis.This makes them a valuable asset both for vetting rider input and for providing important insights into route-level and system network issues related to operations,safety,scheduling,etc. In addition to inputfrom the general public,stakeholders, and City agencies, KWT had consultants spend time in the bus operator break room to informally interview them about existing services, City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-28 227 of 40L2973 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS potential enhancements, and frequent comments on rider needs and complaints. In addition to one- on-one discussions,a surveys was distributed to those who were unable to attend the workshop. I ii p�,,i t S�,,i i'n i'n a ry As the primary connection between transit passengers and operations, KWT bus operators can provided a unique perspective on transit needs and frequent challenges based on their experiences. Some of the key highlights include the following: • In general, riders are happy with the service.The operators indicated that the riders like that the buses are reliable and mostly on-time and that buses always provide them with a comfortable ride to their destinations. • The most frequent complaints operators heard were the need for more frequent service, weekend service on some routes without weekend service,and more service in the evenings. • Other common complaints included the need for more shelters and benches.Some also mentioned missing bus stop signs and not having bus maps and schedules at bus stops so they can see the direction of the bus and when it may be arriving.Some stops have damaged bus stop signs that may need to be addressed. • Drivers expressed that they like working for KWT and like most everything about KWT. Ih a s eII II0 u t,Ire a c u : W o irII<s I o 14 Two additional open house public workshops were conducted as part of Phase II outreach in May 2019.The primary goal of these workshops was to present the transit operating and capital needs identified for the next 10-years and to obtain public input to help KWT set its priorities. In these informal workshops, participants could come and go as they pleased, and KWT staff were available to engage with the public to answer their questions and obtain their input. 4 J The third public workshop was held outside the Publix Supermarket in the Key Plaza Shopping Complex on North Roosevelt Boulevard. It was conducted by KWT transit staff I , and the TDP Project Team from 3:00-6:00 PM on May 28, �IIIIIIIIIIIti I I 2019.The workshop was attended by 95 participants who �p,� asked questions and provided input,with 57 completing = ,m surveys. , A summary of the priorities expressed at this third workshop is as follows: • After reviewing the 10-year service plan,the most desired future KWT improvements were adding the Key West IntermodaI.Center(KWIC) Connector to connect the future intermodaI. facility in Stock Island to the park-and-ride garage in Old Town, keeping the popular Duval City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-29 228 of 40L2974 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Loop as is,and adding a new North Connector. (See Section 8 for a complete list of needs improvements.) • Adding the Stock Island Circulator,the New Town Loop, and the Old Town Loop were seen by participants as the next set of priorities in the next decade. • Other improvements included mobile fare payment,improving user-friendliness and convenience of using KWT, and expanding the transit marketing/awareness campaign. • Overall,comments from the workshop indicated that most desire simpler, more straightforward route structures and smaller loops than the current ones.Also mentioned was the need for easy-to-understand and more accessible information through technology. Pu,l)hc Workshop #4 The fourth and final public workshop was held at the same , location as the previous one,from 8:30-11:00 AM on May 29,2019. The workshop was attended by 80 participants who asked questions and provided input,with 50 completing surveys. < <I The following is a summary of the priorities expressed: • Modifying the Lower Keys shuttle, adding the KWIC Connector, keeping it a truly"quick"connection to shuttle people who may park or connect at Stock Island to the city,and keeping the Duval Loop as is were indicated as the top three most important transit improvements. • Other priorities included adding an Airport Connector, North Connector, and the Stock Island Circulator,which would help many workers connect to routes more quickly due to the new simpler and smaller route structure. • The top three capital and technology improvements supported by participants were establishing a program to allow free transit rides,implementing/enhancing a bus locator app, and establishing the KWIC. • Many full-time and seasonal residents, both young and older,stopped by to provide input and indicate their strong desire to use transit in Key West if it is convenient.Some currently use Uber and taxi services to get around and indicated how expensive it is and how that restricts their mobility in the city.They mentioned that the fare is not a concern for them (as the other services generally cost more) and that simpler,smaller loops in neighborhoods and buses on major roads that comes often are what is needed and will make them use transit. I �m II .,s I �� III.�.~�II'�; I .�.~� Su II"' An online public survey was initiated in March 2019 via social media platforms created for the TDP (discussed later in this section),email blasts, and the KWT website.The survey was available during City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-30 229 of 40L2975 IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNR the open house pub iic workshops to continue gathering pub iic input, and KWT posted information about compieting the survey on its oniine piatforms beginning in March 2018.The survey continued untii [ate June 2018 and was promoted period icaiiyduringthis period via emaii and sociai media. Severai questions were asked on the survey to determine support for potential service improvements, presented as am a p and tab[es both oniine and at dispiay boards during the workshops. In totai,220 surveys were compieted during the course of this TDP. Public Input Survcy Results Simi[arto the second round of pub iicworkshops,adding the KWIC connector, keeping the Duvai Loop as is, and adding an Airport Connector received the most support for service improvements for KWT (Figure 4-35).Support for adding the KWIC Connector and keeping the Duvai Loop as is was notabie throughout the second phase of the pubHc invoivement process.The top three capita[and tech noiogy improvement were improving the user-friendiiness and convenience of using KWT, adding mobiie fare payment options, and imp iementing/enhancing the bus iocator app.As shown in Figure 4-36,the majority of capita[and tech noiogy improvements were received favorabiy. Figure 4-35:Top Service Improvements Add KWIC Connector °�°° Keep DLuva� Loop as Is mammaNNIMMOMMM" Add AillrfaelrtConlnector MN9MMxMxMMxN= Medilf'y L.t1vMelr Key'S1h utfle Add Stock IsIland Q llrcuIlatoir Add NevvTovvin LoopMaMMONNAMMO a °° Add North Connector °° 1 Add OIld Town LoopRMOMMONOM° °°, Add M Id Town Loop U 1°° Figure 4-36:Top Capital/Technology Improvements Ilrripreve Uselr FlrilelndVillness&Celnvelnilelnce of Usiling MN-F MolblIVe Faire Paylrrlelnt V ° U IlrnpIle�Irrle�Int/FIn Ilia ince�Bus LocatoirApp �°° k Worlk wItlh Ciltyto Medilf'y and Enforce ParIkiling Reg uIlatilelnsMMONNOMMMIMMIM ° ° FstalbIlilslh ProgiraIrrl to AV4ow Flree Trainsl'It Rildes ° °° Expand Trainsilt Mairlketiling/Awarelness Cairripallgin WORMNIMMMMM"M FstalbIlilslh Key West Ilntelrlrrleda� Center(K IC) OXIMPMROMMMMM"I" Re evaIl uate Current Bus Stela Nacelrrlelnts Purchase SIrriaHelr Bus VelhIcIlesRMONNNOWN m°° �...,. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 4-31 230 of 40L2976 IIII II III. II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONN'EMNS Other, OutreachAcd\Jties In addition to the many direct and indirect techniques described previously, KWT used available public engagement electronic media .A platforms,such as the kwtransit.com webpage and Facebook sites in the community to KEY' "W Car FlreeKeyWest I� L9'M"alw�1��,�Lli°U � ������;4�1�F11LrY,P4 expand TDP awareness and engagements with PU1.11.11C WORKS11-110PS residents and tourists. KWT also used the City's H... tr H I@ I]IV41 h Y 'nA} Yf 4A1MV AfIV f tAl v+.I I tl!I I mobile app,which it uses to promote transit A©L1IE^delis II�J��1)�U�U�))1�JJU)��)J)��UI1�C� JJ�GJ1� 111�11J1I11I�1�1��rI�IIII����fII�1��1r111�fjC1111�J�1� services to residents and tourists.On social P&SY= Vlasos media, KWT coordinated with Car-Free Key West Facebook page administrators to use that lr6�iei��iail���7�iYoa!pllfrltl'"dI1J1111fiP�;i�r��i"r � ...f and their other channels to provide a platform on which the public could complete the f �ullll!!!Illllf fdt dfd �� °°° general public surveys in addition to raising MII lu I�� I II I� IY u�l" IIIII II II i IIII r l d li��I V� I P lutl awareness about opportunities for public I participation atworkshops and other events C t'{of Mey Mf t...Uavcmllnre+�P .6,UM P"p and access information and updates on the M,,14 q4 progress of TDP development. �Wwr�Qlrup�u,�h.�w�'uri Uty Route Lower Keys Sh"wly e Duval Loop Park&IRlde TrarnsA F01,05 Advertising Oppoftunity Braun Schedule Seniar Fmo Calendar 9919 41,h of July(Service City of Key West TDP Draft Report 4-32 231 of 40L2977 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. Section, 5: S�tua6bn AIpIIIxraI�sdII ATDP is a strategic planning document that includes an appraisal of factors within and outside a service area that affect the provision of transit service.The following sections synthesize the previous efforts in the TDP and a plans review to develop an assessment of the full operating environment for KWT.This assessment serves as the basis for the formulation of KWT's future goals and objectives. Conducting a situation appraisal is a key requirement under the TDP Rule and helps a transit agency examine its strengths and weaknesses as well as any existing/potential threats and opportunities for the provision of its services. A review of local,State, and Federal puns was conducted to ensure consistency between the 10-year plan goals and initiatives with other government policies and punning efforts.The current overall punning and policy environment in the city was reviewed to better understand transit needs; included are reviews of existing socioeconomic trends,travel behavior/patterns, land use,community feedback,organizational issues,technology,and funding. \\Iew At the local and regional levels,several agencies/organizations conduct studies to produce puns and policies for addressing local and regional transportation issues and intermodalism that may impact KWT services.Various Federal and State puns and regulations also may impact the provision of transit services.This puns and policy review helps KWT understand and support the pursuit of existing goals while pursuing its own goal of creating a viable and accessible transit system in Key West. Relevant transportation punning and programming documents are summarized,with an emphasis on issues having implications for KWT.Additionally,selected puns produced for the City of Key West related to land use were reviewed to summarize and call attention to community goals,objectives, and policies that may have implications for current and future transit services. The following local, regional,State, and Federal puns and studies were reviewed to understand current transit policies and puns with potential implications for Key West Transit service: • Local Puns - City of Key West Comprehensive Plan - City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan - Monroe County Comprehensive Plan - Key West 2015-2024 TDP Major Update - Key West Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - Key West TDP 2018 Annual Progress Report City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-1 232 of 40L2978 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR — Monroe County Transportation Disadvantaged Service Pian (TDSP) • Regionai Pians — Miami-Dade Transit Deveiopment Nan — Miami-Dade 2040 Long Range Transportation Nan (LRTP) • State and Federai Pians — Fiorida Transportation Pian: Horizon 2060 — State of Fiorida Transportation Disadvantaged Five-Year/Twenty-Year Nan — Fiorida's Strategic Intermodai System Strategic Nan — FAST ACT — Impiications to Pubiic Transportation of Emerging Technoiogies The transportation planning and programming documents reviewed are summarized in Tables 5-1,5- 2, and 5-3 by their geographic appiicabiiity,type of plan, responsible agency,overview of the plan/program, and key considerations for the situation appraisal. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-2 233 of 40L2979 0 o rn EV m oa E O so 0 m a �o + m y m m_ v E m > > O O a u u a o v o v ° � m o y o y c o a u E- o ° c a°i E o O o v > v ° :9 v v u o °= y so .. o m o o u p n 6 m ? v v m g o v 76 o c y ^a o m v v m 5: � a E � o v y '- u ° m o m _ v a v o ° •• °- v ° ° E ' o H E y o �. c ° m o a .o O E ° _ v � m e 'oo-n O v `�°° ° m ti m LE m v ^ o o v a ou m a o > -a-v °' °J v .? E t o E �, .�. o- >o E �, 3 f0 ° o o- c u o o u. o a t E o �° o c 'm 4 o m o m o _ yu v °o c x m a v m vu c v m v - c ono O `p z � o u `" > v v y c � a m v 3 v v a ovn `o y aeon 3 ° o o >o v o E ? °-I`° 72 E m - �v " E m � � m E n °-'3 m � � ° a � o a v a 1JI/I n o o v - c m m m ` v `_ y a m m o °°b v v 'i o E v v v E v 'E > > " c ' y a ° c vvi f0 .. bq oo v y O_ O m m yUj ° N m U yUj ° N U E ' aT+ y y y .. ° = y E O u i F v m p m C ° y c v O p y O EO �° u y ti m o o V >' -m p O .0 f .+ vOi H m U O N E N N O O_ m E o°n E,c u � $ 3 0 o m c m y o °°°'� >m m ° .. : c m p_ E 3 �, `o a o v p np_ >, o y v u o o °- 'x °: m .. v on o o f v ° u ° m a m Y u tm c �' " p-'� ` Oi ° v a m c .: °u m v c E E c E m c t c .. o - o' o v v o c m E c y au D C T° °°°J ° `" E E c v y m o E -u p bn y N m > V •_+ 'p N o U d C N f°0 E '. p 0 T m> w > O °� i vt ui N c m .un " o .� v m ° ..`^. o o f m o c m y v �, > > f0 v v o 0 t t T u o 'o- v o f o- ° ° v c 'o°n m ovn a oan O m ` v m ° ,v E v am o a ° f0 m ,y o °: o°n c ° m 'on v o ,��, v y m .uv. o_ `m _ o v o v H .. on °- °-m u >O m o > 72 0 0_ `p +' O cc V ¢ w �+ 0 .`+ w Y Y o 0 Y 0 V a O .. �, a m x w 3 v �, p a o a` .� v', v 0 0 J p i o v O p O u1 oO o O o m E m C i V O m bq O m bq O � � � i, � m ,o O � co a r y y > d.O d H .� p N o .. o '.. o .. m ~ 3 a'U o 0_ O_'U o 0_ O_'U O > ] N m C OJ N m m U vo U OE i i C > L a > m p m p bq O p o v C m .- a m 0 > W p m OJ p m OJ m U m d L U m a+ U E °-U v >. E O v O C 0 m U OJ vt 7 tUit a C U N U N O_ '- d m C i y 0 .° m E -OJ O OJ m O N avpi > E y o C U O vt C U O vt C U i U y a, p- > OJ U i m 0J bq N m 0J bq v m Q -0 i i - O H O E i 6om 0 0J � OA f 0 � L O � L O y H i ° m H m O_ 41 0 (n °' N m o i y i O N p_O m p N p_ O m p .� 'vi " " T bq o E > i i w 0 E m O m bq O �^ O bq H C OJ m m OJ C OJ m m OJ C OJ m 0 �^ L 'i+ w N °'L °' vt C OJ y vUi N v o v o U E o o o E < m E E c v o a ¢ u u m ¢ u u m ¢ u v o w u � ¢ v .. ¢ T u v � y v a T T Gy Y L UO T OJ a+ Y N a+ UO T C m m C O N i v N i O O C � a a c � 0 L � � i u Y v T Y Y Y v T OA o .+ O " O m o .+ o .+ o .+ O m O o o y v y v y v o o 0 H > o > > v. t . o v T m a v c 3 u - H on o m N m H O V O1 lo Y OJ OJ OJ °- y a y a v v o w v v v .. vo Y m y E ° y E ° ° E ° '� ° a a ia ia o o o � V N �� o / C LL y c O v Z v v d O O v 0 0 U C iJ tOit y v U v T U W � � v d E LL N O y d m L y 3 N C 0 m 0 v J m n — 0 9 N U O a y 0 0J m Y ., kWE b9 �� NK T v U � y0 Y � C o E 0 _ O V O y E U U U E d Y m o o = v O C m m N 69 ° m v O 1 w O coLo 1�7 3 -m om N m �p - a c O .y ~ O °- E v v U O vt - .+ o E O U y � d o m c v O `O v E o m v a ¢ E w m G! U U >+ C T o > a V O u ' a c E E O m a a c � T U ck� a a f0 'o f0 'o a � a o o 0 0 � H o m + a a .. � H� � T a � mecca V N CO { x�i 00 T y v C T vt a+ v 76 kI V f v ? ° OU �^ f�0 m . bT9 C m p O O d m y v pq i y O v OJ v w o v O U 0 OJ vt O O y > y_ v - 0 ° i a f0 E U y0 yo ° O .0 i y o O � m a o y0 .+ m OJ o. t O m ° T OJ Y E / f os E C a L y OJ O N i vt U O o o U i O .+ o .� O IL EZst Mo y m U U O W ` iJ O o v o p o > U ° E °- y .c o � won a m o � � _ ° a =may u � � o c E o n .� v 3 o o .a o '�a o.f0 .`-' v E �- o u °: c :° l 'u c o y a E y a u o m :° o ° y o m ow n m a o ` o u o .E v o v > E u v c f0 c a; v u o 3 - E .. - a _ u O o .. a y t v 'E o v .. o .m °- v o m u O a a v E a o o °n c .° v o ° E ab L o ` L " `u o .0 o o o y 'o 'o E `m p on E > u o a a .° cc `o o N T > • • • • • a • • • • • • • y : 0 Y o .. a c'n m m M a °o E v m i bb � ,., > m u c a o r.; �.. v u o o °' 'c ° o o .0 E a u m o OJ w OJ i T N f0 U +' 0 fa COJ v j L E bn T U i C O+' u0 E o o m = C C,x- a E O f0 > J 'O O O ?� v C O O O 1 O bn C ° .� O v Su t .. u o EE "v LL E = c v a o o u O m + a O' vt �+ � D 41 ._ i E O m m w C � � C � "' . o U y m u o � a °c E c u c `mc .E ., v .° t 4,f o - v o E a o vo o 0 y ° m ° .. G ° u o ° _ u c u o a s o v o°n v E a E E u °- v °: °en o v .� °= .v °- co° ° ° n'7 2 0 N >. o v O E � � v I t^ 2 u O L N m_ > O O C d O. vt CC LLL °U C vTi a a C °u OJ i N a m o o m m •- � o c � o u f0 � f0 m Kbe udi W o E 0 O " m vOi V Q bq O v Q li V v O � � LL LL LL ti O o 6 d O U o o yJ C OJ OJ OJ � C v � 0 vt OJ o C U W y •+ m r m �n �n w O a o 0 0 0 0 U !� L as OA V o o -m -m l7 Q l.LL LLL LLL Z Z o Q o O_ m O C Q a on a c v d v ° o � O a N c o H a o H moo ` v ° � aLL ° o 3 m y a m o a ° } E c � o j° on aTi LL O v o V E O ~ v f0 OJ H E 2 O u a 0 O III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR II t u ad Ifs ppIr, II a A critical part of the Key Connections update was an appraisal of KWT's operating environment so the agency can develop an understanding of the context for providing transit in Key West. This includes several specific elements through which KWT will be assessed, including the following: • Socioeconomic trends • Travel behavior and commuting trends • Tourism/hospitaiityindustry trends • Community feedback • Land use policies and trends • Organizational attributes and funding • Technology trends ocioecone„ rnic Trends To better assess the impact of the growth in population on public transportation needs, it is important to understand the trends and markets that could be impacted by or may benefit from public transportation services in Key West. Major findings from an assessment of socioeconomic trends are summarized as follows: • According to current data, Key West's population has held somewhat steady at 26,000,with no major population growth or loss in recent years.Although the number of visitors arriving in the city has steadily increased and may continue to rise, Key West has not added and is not expected to add any major housing developments in the coming years. • The most population-dense areas in Key West are in the northwestern portion adjacent to Dredger's Key between Hagler Avenue and N Roosevelt Boulevard, according to theACS).This area consists of single-family dwellings and medium-density residential. • The Downtown Historic District between Truman Avenue and Fleming Street has the most concentration of jobs. This area hosts major attractions such as Duval Street, museums, and restaurants. • Key West is relatively"young"compared to most other planning areas in Florida,with a median age of approximately 41;only 14%of the city's population is over age 65. • Although the annual income of 38% of Key West households is $75,000 or more, 20% earn $25,000 or less.The poverty rate has increased from 5.8%in 2000 to 7.1%today. • Key West is home to a large foreign-born population, with approximately 20.3% of residents born outside the U.S.,which is 7%higher than the national average. • Public space is increasing in Key West, improving the bicycle/pedestrian activity that may benefit from transit. The recently-opened 28-acre, public Truman Waterfront Park includes a City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-6 237 of 40L2983 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR playground, restaurants, green space, and an amphitheater to host community events. The amphitheater and playground were completed in 2018; the park is expected to be fully complete by 2020. Although Key West has been a frequent target of hurricanes due to its geographic location, it has continued to grow in population and jobs, creating more demand for alternative modes of transportation such as transit.It has a comparatively younger population(average age 41)than most other areas in Florida. Although nearly 40% of households have higher incomes ($75,000+ per year), there still are sizable segments of older adults (age 65+) and low-income households in the city, which typically are considered to be more inclined to use transportation, an I rri !Aicatim ris indication of why the City should continue to provide and improve transit for access jobs and other services. In addition, foreign-born populations,especiallythose originallyfrom areas with heavytransit use such as Europe or most South American nations, also may indicate a potential market fortransit. Due to its tourism and the hospitality industry, Key West is home to thousands of jobs, but the workforce has not been sufficient to supply the demand for workers. Many must commute to Key West forjobs, as living in a city with a median home value of$535,600 and average monthly rent of$1,707 may not be feasible for low-wage workers. The City is addressing its affordable housing issue, but current regulations allow the addition of only 500 units over the next 10 years, so the availability of affordable housingwill bestow and may not be adequate.This indicatesthe need fortransitto continue to bring in the necessary workers to keep its economic engine running. In addition, Key West is promoting more use of its recreation with the addition of new public spaces and bike paths,all of which are part of creating an accessible and connected city where transit also can play a key role as a viable mode. C'N' 'y Fra'6ve1. Bryahaviorand Cd,", rnI"m,itinka Trends It is important to understand existing travel and commuting behaviors and patterns to determine possible impacts or benefits affecting public transportation services.Some key findings are as follows: • A majority of commuters in Key West continue to use their personal vehicles to commute. However, unlike most other areas in Florida, alternative transportation modes such as biking, transit,telecommuting,and walking make up a larger percent of commute modes, higher than that typical for Florida. However, the share of commuters using transit is low, at about 2-3%, although still much higher than the transit mode share in most areas in Florida. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-7 238 of 40L2984 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS • Commute patterns show that 67% of Key West workers are employed at locations inside the city and the remaining 33%commute to areas outside the city to work.Atotal of 4.6%commute into the city from other areas, primarily the Lower Keys. • Traffic congestion in Key West is a major issue, with major roads operating at or below their adopted roadway Level of Service (LOS) standards. Congestion has impacted commute times, which since 2000 have steadily increased. • With the increased use of automobiles in Key West, parking demand also has increased. The City recently followed the recommendations of a group that studies the issue and increased parking fees as a step to mitigate the parking problem. • Based on the data collected and input from outreach activities, the portion of Key West's workforce that lives in the Lower Keys and Florida City use the Lower Keys Shuttle to access employment opportunities in Key West and depend on KWT services and the Miami-Dade Transit(MDT) connection north of Marathon to access the Lower Keys Shuttle. As a city established before the invention of the automobile, Key West offers some key ingredients for developing a well-used transit system, including areas with a well-designed grid network of roadways and a relatively high-density population. However, due to its small size and 1m. geographic location, transit has not becomes as widely used as most other older pre-automobile cities in the U.S. KWT has continued its ff eorts to improve services and has done so successful) p Y with the available resources.With its limited resources,the agency continues to rrfi c a't o ri s design a system that encourages city residents and tourists to ride transit instead of using automobiles. Although traffic congestion, parking demand, and the higher cost of parking in Key West provide an opportunity for improving transit,until routes run more frequently, attracting new ridership may be difficult. To attract more workers who live outside the city to use transit, KWT should explore increasing awareness/marketing campaigns forthe current Lower Keys Shuttle service and continue to coordinate with MDT to improve existing connections to the Lower Keys Shuttle.Although current bus frequencies are reasonable, a more frequent route may attract more ridership. However, due to the length of the route,expanding this regional service to meet the needs of the labor force residing outside of Key West will have funding implications that need careful consideration. Expanding services in the city and regional enhancements to the Lower Keys Shuttle may also mean identifying efficiencies for current services.A comprehensive operational analysis of the existing route structure should be considered,as it may lead to efficiency improvements that may result in additional resources that could be used to increase service on the Lower Keys Shuttle. Also, partnerships with regional partners such as Monroe County and FDOT may play an integral part in improving and providing any additional regional transit services. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-8 239 of 40L2985 N / IIIIIU / /IIIIIIU IIIIIIIII. / U IR il(�6 I a l ��//��1yy KEY CONNEDMNR Local, Tm,visrn/Il....iospid:ahty Ilndc ,,sstry Trends In addition to the key focus areas typically included in a TDP Situation Appraisal, a discussion of the local tourism is included for Key Connections due to its importance in the overall operating environment for KWT.The city welcomes millions of tourists worldwide every year,with a majority from areas with good transit services. Key findings from the assessment of tourism-related data include the following: • More than 1 million tourists come from foreign countries, with many from heavy transit use areas. • More than 1.3 million tourists are cruise ship or ferry passengers or arrive via the airport, accordingto the Key West Chamber of Commerce.Although visitors arrivingthrough the airport tend to stay for a few days or longer and may use transit, cruise ship passengers may not use transit due to their short visit. • Hotel occupancy rates in Key West have been consistently high over the last several years and may indicate an opportunity fortransit.Approximately 5,500 roomswere available in 2018,with an 83%occupancy rate, a 3%increase from 2017. • Increased visitor arrivals and hotel occupancy rates mean an increased need for service workers who may not live in the city and must travel to the city for lower-paying jobs and therefore may need transit. In a city in which the total number of people present on any typical day O GOO )), is significantly larger than the actual number of residents, efficient and well-planned transportation is keyso residents can live a quality life and visitors can enjoy their destinations. This significant daily population total creates an operating environment that must meet the transportation needs of visitors and service industry workers and provide services to day trippers, overnight visitors, and cruise ship Irri�p!uicatimris passengers. The visiting population adds more rental cars or other modes such as scooters with drivers who have little familiarity with the travel environment,thus increasing traffic congestion and incidents.Adequate and convenient public transitservice can help mitigate traffic congestion and parking demand and can help the visitors access their destinations more quickly. O 1611 G.:ornrrn,,inity IFeed[mck Many public involvement activities were conducted to gather feedback from area residents and transit users, including three public workshops, stakeholder feedback, public input surveys, and on-board City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-9 240 of 40L2986 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEeMNS surveys. These activities generated a wide range of ideas for existing service and future transit enhancements.Several key themes emerged from the TDP public outreach, including the following: • Who currentlyrides and where-Near1y50%of KWT riders are frequent riders who use the service at least four times per week. Almost 60% are from low-income households with less than $25,000 annual household income. About 32% of riders are age 60 or older. Most important, 37%of current KWT riders use the service to get to work. • More frequent service- Nearly half of current riders identified having more frequent bus service as the most important improvement and also indicated a desire for more weekend service and more routes like the Duval Loop.An overwhelming majority of the general public agreed that there is a need for more transit in the city, and more than 45% indicated the need for more frequent, Duval Loop-type routes in other areas in the city. • Capital improvements - Recurring themes in both the on-board survey and the public input survey included adding more amenities such as benches and shelters at bus stops. • Transit as a viable alternative- Most general public respondents in Key West viewed transit as a needed alternative and a way to relieve congestion/parking issues and connect workers and visitors to their destinations.A large majority(nearly80%)said transitwould relieve congestion or at least provide some help. Input from the community indicated that current bus service is an integral m/11111111111 part of the total transportation network in the city, and both current riders �U� 1 and the general public want KWT transit to continue to improve transit services for the city's residents and visitors.Feedback also showed a strong belief that transit can help mitigate current traffic congestion and parking issues, implying that improvements such as better frequencies on bus U1111111111111111 ������������ �%%%1 routes may attract choice riders (people who have access to a car but choose to ride transit instead of drive).The success of a transit system relies m iCat 011 S heavily on the volume of its ridership, and having more choice riders using transit will help KWT reduce its cost per trip and increase its fare revenues. Most important,transitwill become a viable mode forthe city's residents and tourists. ill, fIII1''rr1G ullr send (Jse IPohC:Iryas and Trends To better assess the impact of local land use conditions and policies on public transportation needs,it was important to identify the current and future areas of the city that may benefit the most from the provision of public transportation services. Key findings from a review of current and future land use conditions are as follows: • A majority of the residential areas allocated to single-family dwellings are in the northern part of Key West. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-10 241 of 40L2987 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONN'CCMNR • The Downtown area has the most employment concentration and comprises historic uses.This area is filled with medium and high density uses that can support to transit. • The southeastern part of Key West is dedicated to conservation and the airport; the northern part is dedicated to military uses. • The City has implemented land use/design guidelines in the Historic District to preserve and protect the architectural and unique characteristics of its historic neighborhoods. These guidelines assist the City's Historic Architectural Review Commission (HARC) in making appropriate decisions concerning construction/renovations, including transit facilities in Key West's Historic District. Key West is a city with population and employment densities that are supportive of transit. It is also mostly built out and inclusive of land use u conditions that provide transit an opportunity to thrive. However I�I�I�II,I�I�I although the dense,compact nature of the city with its grid pattern road Illllll Illllll uluu uul uum uuu network may benefit transit, Florida land-use decisions have mostly favored the automobile for a very long time. Until recently, personal vehicle use, even in the historic Downtown area, has been high and �1r(i°°i cat oris parking cheap. However, for the last decade or so, congestion has steadily increased,and the City has increased parking fees to discourage the use of personal vehicles by visitors. In addition, the City is encouraging the inclusion of transit in its new developments,such as Truman Waterfront Park,whose design includes established areas with access to transit. KWT should continue to work with the City on developing and implementing transit that is supportive of Land Development Codes and policies.With local leaders who are supportive of land use policies that require coordination with transit,there is an opportunity to continue walkable, transit-friendly development patterns in the areas within and outside of the Historic District. JA Organizational,nizational,Attriln,itesand IR,indin KWT currently functions as a department (KWDoT) of the City of Key West to provide fixed-route bus services. Although KWT is the provider of fixed-route transit, Monroe County operates TD services, includingADA complementary paratransit. KWT is also responsible for operations of the park-and-ride garage. The current organizational structure includes 6 operations/administration staff and 16 bus operators. KWT is a rural transit system and,as the City is not part of a metropolitan planning organization (MPO), KWT does not function in collaboration with an MPO as in the typical functional framework for transit agencies in most other areas in Florida. The MPO is usually relied upon to ensure State and Federal funding for existing and future transit operating and capital expenditures.Without an MPO, KWT is in a City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-11 242 of 40L2988 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS unique position when it comes to Federal and State funding and currently coordinates directly with MOT for transportation planning functions and funding. The current organizational structure should continue for Key West Transit, as it has been able to establish a solid foundation for providing transit in the city and,with addition of the Duval Loop and technological and other improvements, it has expanded the reach of transit services over time. However, if KWT needs to significantly improve its services �p�i��i �/lllllr and facilities to serve the city's residents and growingvisitor population, it may need a steady stream of new sources of funding. �rrfi ca" oris As previously noted, Key West is not designated as an urban area and must rely on rural and some non-traditional funding sources from the FDOT. The City receives rural public transit formula funding as a subrecipient of MOT under the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5311 program; allocations from this source are limited and the annual amounts budgeted would not be sufficient to fund the Key West transit system.Therefore, MOT has enhanced the funding by requesting and transferring funding from the Federal Highway Program to the 5311 transit program. This transfer is allowed through the flexible program authorizations authorized by Congress and provides Key West with a larger portion of Federal funding than normal formula allocations, helping to leverage State of Florida Public Transit Block Grant program funding from MOT as well as the local tax funding or assessments the City approves and expends in the transit program. KWT is also funded by a numberof localsources,including gas taxes,advertising revenues,and parking fees. Another local option that may be explored to fund transit is a hotel bed tax, which could help KWT's efforts to improve the existing transit system to a level that may attract more visitors and hotel guests to use the service in lieu of rental cars or hotel transportation.With improved transit service and other riding arrangements with KWT, hotels may be able to rely on KWT services to provide necessary transportation to their guests, resulting in hotels moving away from transporting people. i Fedhno1,ogy and Trends KWT continues to explore innovative ways to enhance the overall transit experience for its patrons by implementing new technologies. It currently offers a live map of bus routes online and operates an arrival information application for the next bus on its website, by telephone, and by text message. Several other technologies and trends are being considered to improve the efficiency and attractiveness of transit services, including the following: • Real time bus tracking- KWT uses Synchromatics software that allows passengers to track the real-time location of its buses. Although presented as an option in the City's mobile app, the real-time bus tracking application is now available on any mobile device and on personal City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-12 243 of 40L2989 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS computers, allowing residents and visitors to download and navigate routes to locate and use bus service to travel within and to the island and minimize wait time at bus stops. • Using software to track performance - KWT buses are equipped with APCs to obtain ridership information;APC data are used to compare passenger counts with passenger statistics from its Syncromatics software. KWT has continued to use technology as a tool to improve the riding experience and to streamline its processes, such as performance �� JBD1 monitoring and fleet maintenance.However,some technologies offered to the rider may need more awareness and continued enhancements. The real-time bus tracking option has made KWT services much easier to access and use,but public input has shown that awareness of the app is low and, as it is offered as part of the City's mobile app, which also includes access to a number of other services,it may be more difficult to �1 r( i cam t o ris locate for use.Therefore, KWT should consider using an app exclusively for transit once it can afford the investment,which could attract choice riders who may feel more comfortable using the system if they know that real-time bus locations can be tracked using smartphones. Transit fare collection technologies have improved in recent years, and improving fare collection methods could significantly improve bus on-time performance and efficiency; KWT should consider an evaluation of fare collection technologies on the routes on which it currently charges a fare. In addition,transit agencies are increasingly opting to use hybrid and electric vehicles by making use of current technological advances in green technology. Findings from the TDP public outreach indicated that communities desire a greener, more environmentally-friendly Key West. Greener buses may also attract more choice riders who may be avoiding diesel buses.Although converting totally to electric may require more resources and facilities, KWT should continue its purchases of hybrid diesel electric buses. KWT should also evaluate emerging technologies such as autonomous vehicles (AV) and connected vehicles in order to determine implementation within the system. Since Key West Transit is classified as a small property, technology could help improve services without increasing workforce or assets. Technology such as connected vehicles could improve system on-time performance, reliable, and frequency. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 5-13 244 of 40L2990 IIII II III. II IIIIIIIII. AIF/COr7R7EMNS Section, 6: GoaIIIIs and UIIII j ° IIII s This section summarizes the transit goats and objectives for Key Connections. These goats and objectives are a criticai component of the TDP, providing the poiicy direction to guide the agency to achieve the community's vision for transit in the city. The transit goats and objectives for the next 10 years were deveioped by updating the adopted TDP goats/objectives for KWT. The update was based on a review and assessment of existing conditions, feedback received from the community and TDP stakehoiders at the pubiic invoivement process, findings in the Situation Appraisai, and discussions with City staff. The updated goats and objectives for 2020-2029 TDP are presented beiow.The agency's overaii mission and vision is provided and is foiiowed bythe goats,objectives,and poiicies designed to heip accompiish the transit mission. provideMission To o sole ond relioble public,tronsportotion effective, onden&/1r"onment"ollysensitive. Vision To operote tr"onsit ser"Wl1R:'es on o tr"opiclot 1slond with unique R.'ommunitt/R:'hor"octer in hormony with the diversity o its people and with its environment. Goal 1: Provide effective, efficient, safe, and convenient service while increasing ridership and accessibility for current and potential riders. Objective 1.1:Increase ridership and accessibility on fixed-route system. Strategy 1.1.1: Enhance frequency to at[east one bus every 15-20 minutes on core corridors. Strategy 1.1.2: Provide a feeder bus network serving neighborhoods at[east one bus every 15- 30 minutes. Strategy 1.1.3: Reguiariy review scheduies to determine where routing and efficiency improvements can be made. Strategy 1.1.4: Add/modify iocai and regionai services to quickiy connect empioyment, shopping, recreationai, medicai, and education centers to residents, commuters, and visitors. Strategy 1.1.5: Work with MOT Commuter Services program to identify and approach major empioyers and initiate empioyee commuter programs, sate of passes, introduce new routes, and/or other commute options to improve access to current and emergingjobs. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 6-1 245 of 40L2991 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Objective 1.2:Establish operational/seasonal schedules. Strategy 1.2.1: Work with Chamber of Commerce to determine peak and off-peak times and include additional service options to address the peak. Strategy 1.2.2: Develop relationships with key tourist sector employers, hotels, and attractions, and partner as appropriate to implement new rider initiatives and temporary services or other options that will attract visitors. Objective 1.3:Encourage training opportunities for transit fleet maintenance employees. Strategy 1.3.1: Conduct monthly webinars for staff. Strategy 1.3.2: Strive to include one training opportunity per year for staff in the budget. Strategy 1.3.3: Use travel training staff to educate the community of the benefits of public transportation and build working relationships with community groups and organizations. Strategyl.3.4: Coordinate with MOT to consider opportunities and bring training to Key West. Goal 2: Provide excellent customer service. Objective 2.1:Reduce the number of complaints by one percent annually each year through 2029. Strategy 2.1.1: Continue the monitoring and tracking of customer feedback. Develop and use periodic reports to identify potential customer needs and improvements. Strategy 2.1.2: Use social media, website, and on-board video technology platforms to facilitate public communications and enhance community relations. Strategy 2.1.3: Enhance the user-friendliness of customer information and expand its availability. Strategy 2.1.4: Provide bus schedule and system information at high ridership bus stops and at key public places in the city for residents and visitors. Strategy 2.1.5: Perform periodic comprehensive operational analyses and review results from on-board surveys to optimize scheduling by route. Strategy 2.1.6: Research and pursue funding for incorporating advanced technologies such as bus locator mobile apps and mobile fare payment. Goal3: Sustain and enhance capital/infrastructure program. Objective 3.1:Bus Replacement Program Strategy 3.1.1: Develop replacement bus schedule that allows purchase of a minimum of two vehicles per year, as funding allows. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 6-2 246 of 40L2992 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Strategy 3.1.2: Purchase smaiier bus vehicies for feeder/circuiator routes and estabiish necessary maintenance faciiities for smaiier vehicies. Track savings reaiized through reduced driver certification and iicensing. Strategy 3.1.3: Maintain and routineiy update inventory of transit stops and bus stop infrastructure. Strategy 3.1.4: Maintain a vehicie repiacement program and coordinate with the Transit Asset Management Nan to ensure targets are met. Objective 3.2:Establish Key West Intermodal Center. Strategy 3.2.1: Secure funding for and expand current Key West Transit administrative and maintenance faciiity on Coiiege Road to a estabiish Key West Intermodai Center. Objective 3.3:Bus Stop Infrastructure Program Strategy 3.3.1: Continue to identify capita[ funding and contract with the existing private provider to add one sheiter and repiace one sheiter per year as appropriate for the number of stop iocations to achieve at [east 50 percent coverage of stops requiring such amenties. Strategy 3.3.2: Increase passenger comfort through the provision of passenger sheiters, benches, and other amenities at bus stops. Deveiop and track threshoids for stops to have bench,sheiter,or other amenities. Strategy 3.3.3: Improve passenger safety and accessibiiity by ensuring KWT bus stops meet minimum ADA accessibiiity requirements. Maintain transition pian for ADA accessibiiity needs and track progress. Strategy 3.3.4: Coordinate with the City's Sustainabiiity Coordinator and Key West Bicycie and Pedestrian Master Nan to iocate bicycie and pedestrian faciiities adjacent to transit corridors and bus stop infrastructure. Goal4: Enhance regional coordination. Objective 4.1:Coordinate with the Monroe County and City of Key West Planning departments. Strategy4.1.1: Provide proposed poiicies and/or comments on poiicies for incorporation by the Punning Department's into the Comprehensive Puns and Land Deveiopment Codes. Strategy 4.1.2: Hoid at [east one meeting per year with iocai officiais of aiijurisdictions within Monroe County and the County Commissioners to discuss transit needs, benefits, and future direction. Strategy4.1.3: Estabiish annuai meeting with Miami-Dade Transit to review service connectivity is maintained. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 6-3 247 of 40L2993 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Objective 4.2:Promote additional commuter services programs with FDOT assistance. Strategy4.2.1: Work with FDOT to distribute Commuter Services Program information through the City of Key West Sustainabiiity Coordinator and the Chamber. Strategy 4.2.2: Meet with the FDOT Commuter Services Program to deveiop a pian of action for commuter programs in Key West,especiaiiy for workers accessing Key West via US-1. Strategy4.2.3: Investigate connections to other regionai transportation providers, such as Greyhound, Key West Express Ferry (from Fort Myers), and other service providers. Objective 4.3:Promote employer-provided subsidies. Strategy 4.3.1: Work with the FDOT Commuter Services Program and coordinate through the Chamber to provide information on transit options and federai pre-tax and subsidy programs to empioyers within Key West. Goal 5: Seek additional and alternative funding options. Objective 5.1:Continue to explore use of local and State funding. Strategy 5.1.1: Stay abreast of what other [ocai areas are doing to create or promote transit funding. Objective 5.2:Review private funding options. Strategy5.2.1: Deveiop marketing materiais and pamphiets on economic benefits of transit and use Chamber, Reactors, and Innkeepers Association to market private ventures for funding. Strategy 5.2.2: Coordinate and estabcish partnerships with hotecs/resorts, cocceges, hospitacs, and other key empcoyers for funding support and/or pre-paid transit fare programs for their empcoyees. Objective 5.3:Research and apply for additional federal and state funding opportunities. Strategy 5.3.1: Work with the City of Key West and FDOT District 6 to identify new or additionac sources of funding for transit operations. Strategy5.3.2: Set up auto acerts on www.grants.gov for any funding opportunities recated to transit. Goal6: Improve system visibility and image. Objective 6.1:Maintain efforts to develop a unified public image and marketing approach. Strategy 6.1.1: Add system information at stop vocations per coca[codes to inform and educate residents and visitors. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 6-4 248 of 40L2994 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Strategy 6.1.2: Enhance bus scheduies and brochures to advertise system features. Strategy 6.1.3: Impiement a separate KWT mobiie app/s with for five bus tracking and fare payment options. Strategy 6.1.4: Consider annuai bus painting contest for either internai or externai advertisement with iocai museums orschoois. Strategy 6.1.5: Conduct customer satisfaction survey every three years. Objective 6.2:Develop a community outreach and education program. Strategy 6.2.1: Evacuate and update community service and speciai event poiicies. Strategy 6.2.2: Attend at [east one community event each quarter to promote transit service and educate attendees. Strategy 6.2.3: Set up an annuai community meeting on state of the system which couid be incorporated into a Roadeo event. Strategy 6.2.4: Deveiop,impiement,and monitor an ongoing system marketing pian/program. Goal 7: Reduce environmental impacts caused by public transit and promote sustainable concepts to promote the community's social and environmental values. Objective 7.1:Reduce KWT's carbon footprint and fuel costs. Strategy 7.1.1: Evacuate budgets and repiacement pian to aiiow for repiacement of diesei buses with aii eiectric buses. Strategy 7.1.2: Coordinate with partners such as FDOT and Greyhound to expiore opportunities to estabiish charging stations for aii eiectric bus vehicies. Strategy 7.1.3: Meet with Sustainabiiity Coordinator annuaiiy to expiore mitigating potentiai negative environmentai impacts by pubiic transit emissions. Strategy 7.1.4: Continue to monitor and maintain invoivement in City[and use pianningefforts that encourage transit-supportive [and uses and redeveiopment aiong existing corridors Strategy 7.1.5: Work with City to identify transportation demand management strategies that wiii cower travei demand within Key West and improve negative impacts of inefficienttravei modes. City of Key West TDP Draft Report 6-5 249 of 40L2995 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. Section, 7: ransII III�")eInnand Assess nn Latent demand assessments area key component of TDPs and yield the building blocks for determining the transit needs for the community when it is combined with the baseline conditions assessment and findings from public outreach and relevant plan reviews.The purpose of this section is to summarize the demand and mobility needs assessment conducted as part of the 10-year TDP for KWT. Transit demand and mobility needs were assessed using the following techniques: • Transit Market Assessment-Two market assessment tools were used to assess demand for transit services for the next 10 years.The toots assessed traditional.and discretionary transit user markets in Key West for various time periods. • Ridership Demand Assessment- Projected ridership demand for the existing fixed-route transit network was analyzed to gauge route-l.evel. and systemwide demand to maintain the current transit service levels and facilities.The projections were prepared using the Transit Boardings Estimation and Simulation Tool. (TBEST),the FDOT-approved ridership estimation software for TDPs. These assessment techniques are summarized below,followed by the results of each technical analysis used to assess the demand for transit services in Key West. ""a II , I\4a�i,�I,,,et, AssessIiiieIiit, Using available and applicable demographics data, a transit market assessment provides evaluations from the perspectives of the discretionary rider market and the traditional rider market,the two predominant ridership markets for bus transit service. Analytical tools for conducting each market analysis for Key West include a Density Threshold Assessment (DTA)for the discretionary rider market and a Transit Orientation Index(TO1)for the traditional rider market.These tools can be used to determine whether existing transit routes are serving areas of the city considered to be transit-supportive for the corresponding transit market and also identify areas that may need to be covered or covers more in the future.The transit markets and the corresponding market assessment tool.used to measure each are described below. Discretionary IRider IMarkets The discretionary market refers to potential riders residing in higher-density areas of the city that may choose to use transit as a commuting or transportation alternative.The analysis conducted uses industry-standard density thresholds to identify the areas in Key West that exhibit transit-supportive residential and employee density levels today as well as in the future.Socioeconomic data for Key West, including dwelling unit/popul.ation and employment data from the 2017 ACS (the most recent available)were reviewed and used to conduct the DTA. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-1 250 of 40L2996 III. ...... /. ,.IIII II III.II IIIIIIIII KEY CONNED MNS Three density threshoids,developed based on industry standards/research,were used to indicate whether an area contains sufficient density to sustain some level of fixed-route transit operations: • Minimum Investment- reflects minimum dwelling unit or employment densities to consider basic fixed-route transit services (i.e., local fixed-route bus service). • High Investment- reflects increased dwelling unit or employment densities that may be able to support higher levels of transit investment(i.e., more frequent service, longer service span, etc.)than areas meeting only the minimum density threshold. • Very High Investment- reflects very high dwelling unit or employment densities that may be able to support more significant levels of transit investment(i.e.,very frequent services, later service hours,weekend service,etc.)than areas meeting the minimum or high-density thresholds. Table 7-1 presents the dwelling unit and employment density thresholds(in terms of Block Groups) associated with each threshold of transit investment. Table 7-1:Transit Service Density Thresholds Level of Transit Investment Dwelling Unit Density Employment Density Threshold' Threshold' Minimum Investment 4.5-5 dwelling units/acre 4 employees/acre High Investment 6-7 dwelling units/acre 5-6 employees/acre Very High Investment >8 dwelling units/acre >7 employees/acre TRB,National Research Council,TCRP Report 16,Volume 1(1996),"Transit and Land Use Form,"November 2002,MTC Resolution 3434 TOD Policy for Regional Transit Expansion Projects. Z Based on review of research on relationship between transit technology and employment densities. Map 7-1 illustrates the results of the 2017 DTA analyses conducted for Key West, identifying areas that support different levels of transit investment based on existing dwelling unit and employment densities.These maps also include the existing KWT system routes to gauge how well the current transit network covers the areas of Key West that are considered supportive of at least a minimum level of transit investment. Results The 2017 DTA analysis indicates that the discretionary transit markets are derived mainly from population densities rather than from employment densities and can be summarized as follows: • ACC areas that meet the threshold for minimally-supportive dwelling units of transit investment in 2017 are concentrated in Key West, but also are located in Stock Island. • The areas that are considered "very high"dwelling unit thresholds for transit investments are concentrated in Old Town between White Street and Fort Street and in New Town adjacent to Northside Drive and Duck Avenue. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-2 251 of 40L2997 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR • Areas between Rooseveit Boulevard and Hagler Avenue adjacent to First Street and adjacent to Hagler Avenue and Donald Avenue meet the threshold for"high"dwelling units for transit investments.These areas are in Old Town and in the center of the island. • Areas that meet the "minimum"threshold in Stock Island are south of US-1 and in Old Town adjacent to White Street. • Areas that meet"high" and "very high"employment thresholds are: — Concentrated in the Old Town area,starting at White Street to the edge of the island running along Margaret Street, including restaurants and attractions on Duval Street, Mallory Square,the Key West Aquarium,Truman Waterfront Park, and various museums. — Adjacent to White Street and Truman Avenue including various schools,worship centers, and restaurants. — In New Town between Roosevelt Boulevard and FiagierAvenue,including Keys Plaza,the Housing Authority of Key West,various shopping, and education centers. • The most concentrated area for"very high"employment and dwelling unit thresholds is in Old Town south of White Street towards the edge of the island. Based on the 2017 DTA,a majority of the areas in Key West meet the minimum thresholds for employment and dwelling units. Traditional,al, (Rider I Markets A traditional rider market refers to population segments that historically have had a higher propensity to use transit or are dependent on public transit for their transportation needs.Traditional transit users include older adults,youths, and households that are low-income and/or have zero vehicles. For some individuals,the ability to drive is greatly diminished with age,so they must rely on others for their transportation needs. Likewise,younger persons not yet of driving age but who need to travel to school,employment,or for leisure may rely more on public transportation until they reach driving age. For lower-income households,transportation costs are particularly burdensome,as a greater proportion of income is used for transportation-related expenses than it is for higher-income households. Households with restricted income,such as those with no private vehicle, are more likely to rely on public transportation. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-3 252 of 40L2998 » ................0 MINE NONERION ORION MINE ORION N OEM, ORION ',p�maru i ORION MEMO NINE C,y w cn Z-�._ to WON PENN 0 .ERON _ RON es INNIS ENRON k'w '� CVPw i HE // I/ it �� ��9 .,, J "` •� n.. r,'°+, �Y b� l5 fly i J 4� fPr 4� ®� �5- oY 10 '..... '44 / 444 44, II p �y rru%p for 0j rr�,.P j ������uuuuuuuuuuuum pY�•; ��,4Y ��'"�`"V���\���`��I\� I II�IIIIIII � _ _ y, IIIII IIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIII � � uum uum II' uuuu � o III lO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIVVV� 44 Y �����������u �� low i d ullmi�. �IIuuum � N J ���" o IIIIIII II��Illluull jII uuuuumu IIII uuuuuuuuuuuuu � I N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% %/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLII�IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLI� //// �i J �� I , � g(�6 u���������, �NN�,._ / , 09 if KEY CONNEeMNS A Transit Orientation Index(TO I)was developed to assist in identifying areas of the city where these traditional rider markets exist.To create the TO forth is analysis,demographic data from the ACS 5-Year Estimates (2012-2016)were analyzed at the block group level for the demographic and economic variables shown in Table 7-2. Table 7-2:T01 Variables T01 Variable Units Population Age 14 and Under Youth residents Low-Income Population $25,000 or less annual income for4-person household Households with Zero Vehicles Zero-vehicle households Population Age 65 and Over Older adults Using data for these characteristics and developing a composite ranking for each census block group, each area was ranked as"Very High," "High," "Medium,"or"Low" in their respective levels of transit orientation. Map 7-2 illustrates the 2016 TOI, reflecting areas throughout the city with varying traditional market potential.The existing transit route network shows how well Key West Transit covers those areas. Results • There are a few areas that exhibit"high"or"very high"orientation towards transit are scattered throughout the island and are adjacent to transit routes. • Areas exhibiting a "very high"orientation towards transit are adjacent to Roosevelt Boulevard and FlaglerAvenue and between US-1 and 5thAvenue. • An area considered to be"high"orientation is located between Truman Avenue and Simonton Street in the Bahama Village neighborhood. • Areas that are considered "medium"orientation are concentrated in Old Town adjacent to Fleming Street along Margaret Street to the edge of the island, Dredger's Key, between Bertha Street and FlaglerAvenue, north of US-1 adjacentto College Road,and south of US-1 adjacent to Maloney Avenue. • ACC areas that have a "medium"orientation or higher to transit are adjacent to a transit route. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-5 254 of 40L3000 o � ! ; 1 i ft5 MEW- AI VEHE loom HMM so yg eyso m aun a"ro.. -0 co e. �'a I I ✓��T. L w�u / i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,c, I gtFSYn (III(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '. I 0 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII f rr co too"" � IIu alum In �f i / uuu lu�uuuuuuum � muuullllool �� I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � �� �� / IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � ,i �� rc �;/%//��i�i � II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �r � � ��- q Ion IIIIII IIIIII � % L N Il�lluullll��luuum � II II III.II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNECMNR :'I IIre c t 'RIIdershIIpIn a�ysII In addition to using the GIS-based tools to assess latent demand, as summarized previously,demand for ridership for the next 10 years was conducted. Ridership forecasts were prepared using the most recent version of T-B EST(Version 4.4),the FDOT-app roved transit demand forecasting tool. T-B EST is a comprehensive transit analysis and ridership-forecasting model that can simulate travel demand at the individual route level.The software was designed to provide near-and mid-term forecasts of transit ridership consistent with the needs of transit operational planning and TDP development. In producing model outputs,T-BEST also considers the following: • Transit network connectivity-The level of connectivity between routes within a bus network; the greater the connectivity between bus routes,the more efficient the bus service becomes. • Spatial and temporal accessibility-Service frequency and distance between stops;the larger the physical distance between potential bus riders and bus stops,the lower the level of service utilization.Similarly, less frequent service is perceived as less reliable and, in turn, utilization decreases. • Time-of-day variations- Peak-period travel patterns are accommodated by rewarding peak service periods with greater service utilization forecasts. • Route competition and route complementarities-Competition between routes is considered. Routes connecting to the same destinations or anchor points or that travel on common corridors experience decreases in service utilization.Conversely, routes that are synchronized and support each other in terms of service to major destinations or transfer locations and schedule benefit from that complementary relationship. The following section outlines the model input and assumptions,describes the T-BEST scenario performed using the model, and summarizes the ridership forecasts produced by T-BEST. ode1. Inp�,,i :s/ ss�,irnI:tIons and L...II'nI'ts:tIons T-BEST uses various demographic and transit network data as model inputs.The inputs and the assumptions made in modeling the KWT system in T-BEST are presented below.The model used the recently-released T-BEST Land Use Model structure (T-BEST Land Use Model 2018),which is supported by parcel-level data developed from the Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) statewide tax database.The DOR parcel data contain land use designations and supporting attributes that allow the application of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)-based trip generation rates at the parcel level as an indicator of travel activity. It should be noted, however,that the model is not interactive with roadway network conditions. Therefore, ridership forecasts will not show direct sensitivity to changes in roadway traffic conditions, speeds,or roadway connectivity. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-7 256 of 40L3002 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS Tronsit Network The transit route network for all existing KWT routes was created to reflect 2019 conditions,the validation year for the model.General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data for KWT as of February 2019 were obtained from the Florida Transit Data Exchange (FTDE) as the base transit system. Data include: • Route alignments • Route patterns • Bus stop locations • Service spans • Existing headways during peak and off-peak periods(frequency at which a bus arrives at a stop—e.g., 1 bus every 60 minutes) The GTFS data were verified to ensure the most recent bus service spans and headways;edits were made as needed.Transfer locations were manually coded in the network properties. Socioeconomic Data The socioeconomic data used as the base input for the T-BEST model were derived from ACS Five- Year Estimates (2012-2016), Bureau of Labor Statistics,the Bureau of Economic Analysis,2015 InfoUSA employment data, and 2015 parcel-[eve[ [and use data from the Florida DOR. Using the data inputs listed above,the model captures market demand (population,demographics,employment, and [and use characteristics)within 1/4-mile of each stop. T-BEST uses a socioeconomic data growth function to project population and employment data. Using ACS socioeconomic data, population and employment growth rates were calculated. Population and employment data are hard-coded into the model and cannot be modified by end- users.As applied,the growth rates do not reflect fluctuating economic conditions as experienced in real time. Special Generators Special generators were identified and coded into T-BEST to evaluate the opportunity for generating high ridership. KWT special generators include the following: • University- Florida Keys Community College • Transfer Hub- Holiday Inn (Marathon), Lower Keys Medical Center • Shopping Mail-Overseas Market • Hospital- Lower Keys Medical Center • Airport- Key West International Airport City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-8 257 of 40L3003 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNR F-BES T Model Limitations It has iong been a desire of FDOT to have a standard modeiing too[for transit demand that couid be standardized across the state,similar to the Fiorida Standard Urban Transportation Mode[Structure (FSUTMS) mode[ used by MPOs in deveioping iong range transportation pians (LRTPs). However, whereas T-BEST is an important too[for evacuating improvements to existing and future transit services, mode[outputs do not account for catent demand for transit that coucd yiecd significantcy higher ridership. In addition,T-BEST cannot dispcay sensitivities to externac factors such as an improved marketing and advertising program,changes in fare service for customers,fuec prices, parking suppcy,wackabicity and other coca[conditions and,correspondingcy, mode[outputs may over- estimate demand in isocated cases. Acthough T-BEST provides ridership projections at the route and bus stop cevecs, its strength Gies more in its abicity to facicitate recative comparisons of ridership productivity.As a resuct, mode[outputs are not absocute ridership projections, but, rather, are comparative for evacuation in actuac service impcementation decisions.T-BEST has generated interest from departments of transportation in other states and continues to be a work in progress that wicc become more usefuc as its capabicities are enhanced in future updates to the mode[.Consequentcy, it is important for KWT to integrate sound pcanningjudgment and experience when interpreting T-BEST resucts. Ridership Forecast Usingthese inputs, assumptions, and route [eve[ ridership data obtained from KWT,theT-BEST mode[was vacidated. Using the vacidation mode[as the base mode[,T-BEST ridership forecasts for this TDP major update pcanning starting year(2019) and horizon year(2029)were devecoped.The generated annuac ridership forecasts reflect the estimated [eve[of service uticization if no changes were to be made to any of the fixed-route services. Tabce 7-3 shows the projected number of totac annuac riders by route in 2019 and 2029 as wecc as average annuac ridership growth rates from 2019 to 2029 derived from T-BEST.Tabces 7-4,7-5, and 7-6 show the projected annuac riders on weekdays,Saturdays, and Sundays from 2019 to 2029. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-9 258 of 40L3004 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Table 7-3:Total Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* Absolute 10-Year Route Annual Annual Change, Growth Rate, Ridership,2019 Ridership,2029 2019-2029 2019-2029 Blue 51,135 56,151 5,016 9.8% Duval Loop 322,720 338,619 15,899 4.9% Green 50,785 55,642 4,857 9.6% Lower Keys Shuttle 91,770 102,738 10,968 12.0% Orange 26,655 29,435 2,780 10.4% Red 50,450 56,010 5,560 11.0% Totals 593,515 638,595 45,080 7.6% Based on T-BEST model Table 7-4:Weekday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* Absolute 10-Year Route Annual Change, Growth Rate, Ridership,2019 Annual Ridership,2029 2019-2029 2019-2029 Blue 35,955 39,718 3,763 10.5% Duval Loop 221,850 233,028 11,178 5.0% Green 36,210 40,077 3,867 10.7% Lower Keys Shuttle 68,340 78,034 9,694 14.2% Orange 22,695 25,136 2,441 10.8% Red** 42,585 47,464 4,879 11.5% Totals 427,635 463,457 35,822 8.4% Based on T-BEST model City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-10 259 of 40L3005 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEMNS Table 7-5: Saturday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* Absolute 10-Year Route Annual Annual Change, Growth Rate, Ridership,2019 Ridership,2029 2019-2029 2019-2029 Blue 6,655 7,153 498 7.5% Duval Loop 51,920 53,963 2,043 3.9% Green 6,490 6,856 366 5.6% Lower Keys Shuttle 13,090 13,704 614 4.7% Orange 3,960 4,299 339 8.6% Red 7,865 8,546 681 8.7% Totals 89,980 94,521 4,541 5.0% Based on T-BEST model Table 7-6: Sunday Annualized Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements,2019-2029* Absolute 10-Year Route Annual Annual Change, Growth Rate, Ridership,2019 Ridership,2029 2019-2029 2019-2029 Blue 8,525 9,280 755 8.9% Duval Loop 48,950 51,628 2,678 5.5% Green 8,085 8,709 624 7.7% Lower Keys Shuttle 10,340 11,000 660 6.4% Orange" -- -- -- -- Red** -- -- -- -- Totals 75,900 80,617 4,717 6.2% Based on T-BEST model '*No Sunday service FoI"f'.C,i'st RIdf'.I"ship Anal,ysis Based on the T-BEST model resu its shown in Table 7-3, maintaining the status quo will resuit in only a small increase in KWT ridership for ail routes overtime.According to the projections,overall annuai ridership is only expected to increase by nearly 8 percent by 2029, an annual growth rate of less than one percent.Weekend service shows even slower rate of growth between 2019 and 2029.The model ridership projections seem to indicate that maintaining the existing route structure/alignments may provide only minimal growth for the system over the next 10 years.These results,combined with the input from public outreach, may imply that a revision or a reimagining of the current network with frequency enhancements may lead to more ridership productivity. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 7-11 260 of 40L3006 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNFeMNS Section, 8: AIII II° IIII IIIIIIII Illk° IIIII IIIII IIII III � 1114 This section summarizes the development of potential transit improvements for the KWT 10-year TDP. The needed improvements, referred to as alternatives, represent the transit needs for the next 10 years. It should be noted that these needs were developed without any consideration of funding constraints to reflect the true needs of the community. The alternatives were developed based on information gathered through various data collection and outreach efforts conducted for the TDP.The identified service alternatives are then prioritized.The prioritized list of improvements is used to develop the 10-year implementation and financial puns,to be summarized in the full Draft TDP. Deve Io nien f II rawt, Needs The 2020-2029 TDP transit alternatives consist of improvements that enhance existing KWT services and expand service to new areas.The alternatives reflect the transit needs for the next decade and have been developed based on information gathered through the following methods: ���� �III11111I011l1�1111�� Community Needs&Vision- Many direct and indirect public outreach techniques were used to obtain public input on transit vision and corresponding needs throughout the Key Connections planning process. Public i nput su rveys, public fIIJl11lr /ll/rf' workshops, rider surveys,operator interviews,stakeholder interviews, public workshops,discussion groups,and other communications were conducted to gather input from the public,stakeholders,elected officials,and the community regarding the transit needs and vision for the next 10 years. Situation Appraisal- Major updates to 10-year TDPs are required by State law to f include a situation appraisal of the environment in which the transit agency operates. This helps to develop an understanding of KWT's operating environment in the VUJ context of key elements as specified in the TDP Rule.The implications from the situation appraisal findings were considered in identifying potential transit alternatives. Key West Transit Goals&Objectives-Objectives and policies often provide insight into transit needs within the community and the potential means with which to meet �P11 Y�� them. KWT's goals and objectives, updated as partof this 10-yearTDP re-emphasize ���JrO ' /iiiiigrmiilrllanll many of the agency's priorities and outline new and enhanced priorities to make transit a truly viable choice of travel for residents and visitors in Key West. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-1 261 of 40L3007 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNEeMNS Transit DemandAssessment-As presented previously, an assessment oftransit demand and needs also was conducted for Key West.The assessment included the �I�I�����IIIIOIIII use of various GIS-based analysis toots and methodologies that used demographics data conducive to transit.These technical analyses,together with the baseline conditions assessment and performance reviews previously conducted,also were used to help identify areas with transit-supportive characteristics when developing the list of transit alternatives. Based on these methods, alternatives were identified and grouped into four categories—Service, Infrastructure,Technology, and Policy Improvements.Specific improvements identified within each category are summarized below and depicted in Map 8-1. 1. ...Yea I. IN II.:II a in The proposed alternatives of the Key Connections TDP include a major restructuring of the KWT system,including more direct routing designed to connect riders throughout the city,additional circulator routes to move people quickly within the major hubs or activity centers within the city, and more frequent service for reduced wait times throughout the entire system. All routes would operate seven days per week to match the current Duval Loop for service span,6:00 AM to 12:00 midnight.With the new structure, KWT is considering revision of its fare policies that includes an array of pass options but retains the $2.00 fares for connector routes, $0.50 for circulators/loops (except KWIC Connector and Duval Loop), and other free or reduced fare opportunities. er,\ II Needs CC Major Connector Network The proposed 10-year plan for KWT includes a major connector network that will use larger buses (switching to smaller buses for later night service) and would operate primarily on major corridors in Key West.The routes were designed after reviewing the demographics data and stakeholder and public input and also through a closer review of the most heavily-used/high activity bus stops in the current KWT network. • KWIC Connector- Establish a new 15-minute frequency service between the new KWIC and KWT's park-and-ride at Grinnell and Caroline to shuttle riders transferring from the Stock Island Circulator(discussed later) and the modified Lower Keys Shuttle (also discussed later). This high-frequency connection will also allow any visitor who wants to use the free parking at KWIC to enjoy a fast and relaxing ride to the city.This"KWIC Ride"will be provided free for anyone transferring from Stock Island Circulator,the Lower Keys Shuttle,or connecting from KWIC to the parking garage. For those who plan to use transit in the city,the Wi-Fi available on City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-2 262 of 40L3008 III. ...... /. ,. IIIIIIIII. IIII IIIII. � /. KEY CONNED MNS the KWIC Connector will allow them to download the new mobile payment app and pay for city buses. • Airport Connector-This route would travel primarily on South Roosevelt and provide a connection from the airport to the KWT park-and-ride at Grinnell and Caroline.The route would begin at Seaside Drive near Ocean Walk apartments and would connect to the airport and the park-and-ride every 20 minutes. • North Connector-Service on this route would begin at Seaside Drive near Ocean Walk apartments and would travel primarily on N Roosevelt,ending at the park-and-ride at Grinnell and Caroline.The service would be offered every 15 minutes. • Modified Lower Keys Shuttle-The Lower Keys Shuttle would terminate at KWIC,eliminating the need to cross the bridge or get into city traffic congestion.The service would operate at 45-minute frequencies in the AM and PM peaks and every 90 minutes at othertimes. It would continue to connect riders with the regional service provided by MDT to Marathon. Feeder Loop/Circulator Network The proposed 10-year plan for KWT also includes maintaining/modifying some of the current loop/circulator routes and establishing new services, as summarized below.Similar to developing connector routes,these routes also were designed after reviewing demographics data,stakeholder and public input, and the high activity bus stops in the current KWT network. • New Town Loop-This feeder loop would serve on and north of Kennedy Drive on the island. The route would provide service every 15 minutes and would begin at the Overseas Market transfer location and also would serve the Senior Center transfer location. • Mid-Town Loop-This service would serve the area between the Kennedy Drive and White Street and connect riders in those neighborhoods or any connecting riders to City Hall,the Senior Center,or the Overseas Market transfer locations.The route would provide service every 15 minutes. • Old Town Loop-This feeder loop would join the current Duval loop to provide 15-minute service coverage in the Old Town area and would shuttle visitors, commuters,and others to and from the park-and-ride to their destinations in Old Town. • Duval Loop-The current loop would be maintained at 15-minute frequencies and would continue to be free. • Stock Island Circulator-A new circulator is proposed to serve Stock Island at 15-minute frequencies.The route would serve more locations in Stock Island than the current KWT coverage, but riders would have to use the KWIC Connector to get to the city to access the rest of the city routes. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-3 263 of 40L3009 III. ...... /. ,. II IIIIIIIII. KEY CONNED MNS Ca�� it a�/IIIiifIIastIl.0 t, uli / Il :Ihno� g Needs • Key West Intermodal Center-The current KWT facility in Stock Island would be expanded to establish an intermod al.center with bus transfer facilities and a park-and-ride for personal vehicles and tour buses.The state-of-the-artfacHitywould be the nerve center for the new transit system previously described, allowing the reduction of ever-increasing congestion and parking demand. Eventually,even water-borne services,taxis,or ferries could connect the KWIC with the seaport and/or other locations. • Smaller bus vehicles-Smaller, non-CDL operator buses should be added to serve midtown, New Town, and the Stock Island loop/circulator.These smaller buses would also be used for other routes when ridership is low in off-peak periods,such as at night. • Bus locator app- Instead of the current transit app that is included within the City app, an app should be implemented exclusively for KWT(e.g., CneBusAway)to allow users to locate bus stops and bus arrival times at those stops relative to where they are. • Mobile fare payment-A mobile app for fare payment by residents,commuters, and visitors should be implemented. • Improved user-friendliness and convenience-A simple-to-understand bus map should be displayed at most bus stops, next bus information should be included on electronic displays, Wi-Fi should be provided,and bike parking at key transfer locations should be provided. .:IIohc:y/ th er Needs • Work with City of Key West to modify and enforce parking regulations-Work with the City to significantly increase cost of tour bus parking so the free parking at KWIC is utilized and transit is promoted in the city instead of large tour buses. In addition,work with the City to increase parking costs for visitors to promote free parking at the KWIC and visitors using transit in the City instead of personal vehicles. • Free transit rides for hotel employee/guests- KWT and the City should work with the hotels and other establishments to allow free rides for employees and visitors if they provide financial contributions to transit operations. • Marketing/awareness campaign- KWT and the City should work with current advertising vendors to expand the advertising program,including electronic displays of local information and key points of interest on buses, including restaurant and attraction ads by paid advertisers. In addition,they should work with interested advertisers to announce their business/location information when a bus reaches a stop close to those locations. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-4 264 of 40L3010 / O a 12 ' 0 Z(0001) (!� � I -C m loom Uy O U L a) 1 qft .......... 14, 14 �i r 100 uan Ar a u � i `o'" m , Coo"' � J It 4� a�CL CD i 1¢ Pil w + t f 1 / LJJ ullllllllllllln l _ p co I GOiO os p [ IIII V IIII II IIUI. ...........,..... /.. ,V IIII IIII IIIIII IIUI.. � / , itifl �/�1y KEY CONNED MNS :::'v aW a ti IPA of Akernatives The remainder of this section summarizes the evaluation process for service alternatives developed for the Key Connections TDP. Because many alternatives are identified, ranging from expansion of existing routes to implementation of new routes, it is important for KWT to prioritize these improvements to effectively plan and implement them within the next 10 years using existing and/or new funding sources. lkeI"lil;:Lives lmmvak..is:tion ME'thodobgy A quantitative-qualitative methodology was developed to evaluate and prioritize the transit alternatives presented in the previous section.To prioritize and program these service improvements, it was important to weigh the benefits of each service improvement against the others. By conducting an alternatives evaluation, KWT can better prioritize projects and allocate funding using an objective prioritization process.The remainder of this section identifies and defines the evaluation criteria used to prioritize the service improvements. Three evaluation categories were identified for determining criteria for the evaluation: • Public Outreach • Transit Markets • Productivity&Efficiency ° VI es �r , t0-Year w n Transit NedAi ; �( J Table 8-1 lists these categories and their corresponding criteria,the associated measure of effectiveness, and the assigned weighting for each.A description of the elements in the table follows. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-6 266 of 40L3012 IIII V IIII II IIUI. ...........,..... /.. ,V IIII IIII IIIIII IIUI.. � / , itifl �/�1y KEY CONNED MNS Table 8-1:Alternative Evaluation Measures Relative Overall Category Criteria Measure of Effectiveness Weighting Category Weight Level of interest in specific alternatives(Very High, Survey High, Moderate, None),as indicated by Transit 20% Public Results Priorities Survey 40% Outreach Level of interest in specific improvements(Very Public Input High, High, Moderate, None),as gathered from 20% overall public input Traditional Percent of corridor in"High"or"Very High"transit 15% Market orientation area Discretionary Percent of corridor area that meet"Minimum" Transit Market Density Threshold Assessment(DTA)threshold for 15% ° Markets employment or dwelling-unit density 40/o Local/ Connectivity to key activity centers/hubs locally Regional and regionally 10% Market Productivity Trips per hour(TBEST generated trips per revenue 10% Productivity hour of service) &Efficiency Cost 20% Efficiency Cost per trip (including new trips) 10% Total 100% 100% Public Outreach An extensive public outreach process was conducted for this TDP effort and resulted in numerous opinions and suggestions on transit services from transit users and non-users and local businesses/organizations. In addition,the public outreach process included discussions with policy leaders and KWT and City staff to gauge their views on transit services. Based on an in-depth review of input received, interest in a particular route or type of service was categorized as"None," "Moderate," "High,"or"Very High" in the alternatives evaluation process. Transit Markets For the evaluation of alternatives,three transit markets were identified: • Traditional Market-existing population segments that historically have had a higher propensity to use transit and/or are dependent on public transit for their transportation needs. For the alternatives evaluation,the proportion of each corridor operating within a "High"or"Very High"transit-oriented area was calculated. • Discretionary Market- potential riders living in higher-density areas of the city that may choose to use transit as a commuting or transportation alternative.The proportion of each City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-7 267 of 40L3013 IIII V IIII II IIUI. ...........,..... /.. ,V IIII IIII IIIIII IIUI.. � / , itifl �/�1y KEY CONNED MNS corridor meeting at[east the"Minimum"dwelling unit or employment density threshold in the 2020 DTA was calculated and used for the alternatives evacuation. • Local/Regional Market-each potential. route was assessed for potential.coca[/regional. connectivity. Routes connecting to key hubs and area within and outside of the city were considered for the a[tern atives evaluation. Inner-and inter-city routes with connections to key activity centers (existing and future) or hubs were scored higher than those not servings uch locations. Based on conclusions drawn from public involvement input,quick and convenient connectivity between major activity centers is a desired attribute for future KWT routes. Productivity and Efficiency Productivity is generally measured in terms of ridership productivity and cost-efficiency measures used by transit agencies to gauge how well it uses existing resources. Ensuring productivity and cost- efficiency is critical to the success of the agency, and services projected to perform well in terms of their productivity and efficiency should receive a higher priority. Forecasts of ridership, revenue hours, and operating costs for each individual alternative are used in this evaluation process. • Ridership productivity- measured in terms of annual passenger trips per revenue hour of service.To provide for an equal comparison between alternatives, passenger trips and revenue hours of service were generated using output from TBEST 2029 ridership data. • Cost efficiency-evaluated for each alternative using a transit industry standard efficiency measure,operating cost per passenger trip,which uses KWT performance data and TBEST 2029 ridership data. A detailed summary of various measures used in the evaluation, as well as the alternatives scoring thresholds,are presented next. lkE'.I"lila'tIves SCd," ring T hI"E'"ahoWs As noted,each criterion is assigned a weight.Weighting the criteria affords the opportunity to measure the relative importance of each among the group of criteria to be applied. For each transit alternative, a score was determined eitherthrough the computation of the selected measure or through the educated judgment of the assessor.Scores for the more qualitative criteria (i.e., public input and regional connectivity) were assigned based on a relative comparison of each transit alternative with other transit alternatives.A higher score is consistent with a higher ranking for a given alternative forthe criterion being evaluated. The thresholds for computation-based criteria (traditional market,choice market,trips per hour, and operating cost per trip)were determined using the average of the entire data set and one standard deviation above or below the average.Table 8-2 shows the thresholds and scoring for each criterion used in the alternatives evaluation. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-8 268 of 40L3014 IIII V IIII II IIUI. ...........,..... /.. ,V IIII IIII IIIIII IIUI.. � / , itifl �/�1y KEY CONNED mNs Table 8-2:Alternatives Evaluation-Scoring Thresholds Criteria Range Score Less than(Average-1 SD) 1 Between (Average-1 SD)to 3 Survey Results- Average Transit Priorities Survey More than Average to(Average+1 5 SD) More than (Average+1 SD) 7 None 1 Public Input-General Moderate 3 Observations High 5 Very High 7 Less than(Average-1 SD) 1 Between (Average-1 SD)to 3 Traditional Market Potential Average (%Serving Traditional Market) More than Average to(Average+1 5 SD) More than(Average+1 SD) 7 Less than(Average-1 SD) 1 Between (Average-1 SD)to 3 Discretionary Market Potential Average (%Serving Choice Market) More than Average to(Average+1 5 SD) More than (Average+1 SD) 7 None 1 Local/Regional Connectivity Moderate 3 High 5 Very High 7 Less than(Average-1 SD) 1 Between (Average-1 SD)to 3 Trips per Hour Average More than Average to(Average+1 5 SD) More than (Average+1 SD) 7 More than (Average+1 SD) 1 More than Average to(Average+1 3 Operating Cost per Trip SD) Between(Average-1 SD)to 5 Average Less than (Average-1 SD) 7 Note:SD=statistical Standard Deviation City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-9 269 of 40L3015 IIII V IIII II IIUI. ...........,..... /.. ,V IIII IIII IIIIII IIUI.. � / , IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIUIUIIIIIpIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIUII ,�� � � ��/ I � � �I���fl��''�����°�N�._ / Il��lu�V� I I a� if KEY CONNEeMNS t;Cii una ve s v a uaHai in s ut,s S Table 8-3: 10-Year Transit Service Alternatives Ranking Rank proposed Improvement Evaluation Score Reordered by Rank 1 Keep Duval Loop as is 5.6 2 Add KWIC Connector 5.5 3 Modify Lower Keys Shuttle 4.4 4 Add Airport Connector 4.1 5 Add North Connector 3.9 6 Add Old Town Loop 3.6 7 Add New Town Loop 3.3 8 Add Mid Town Loop 3.3 9 Add Stock Island Circulator 3.0 Each alternative received a score by using the process summarized previously.The alternatives were then ranked based on their respective scores. Priority rank order and resulting scores from the evaluation are presented in Table 8-3. The top three improvements resulting from the alternatives evaluation are keeping the Duval Loop as is, adding the new KWIC Connector to connect the punned intermodal center and other key locations in new and mid-town to the City park-and-ride, and modifying the Lower Keys Shuttle to terminate at KWIC.These results are consistent with the community's vision of making transit a true alternative for travel in the City in the next 10-years. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 8-10 270 of 40L3016 UVIII IIIII / IIIIIU /UIIIIIIIU ��� � IIII��IIIII�IIIII�I�IIUU ,/ ill � „/ ,��➢��,����N� ,,,.:�/ ��//��1yy AIF/�nr/�r7R7EGl�NS rn ctilo ln, : °1 O-Yea�. ..... ransIIIt II' IIIan This section summarizes the recommended 10-year transit pian for Key Connections TDP.As mentioned previousiy,the recommended 10-year Key Connections pian inciude a major restructuring of the current transit system in Key West to inciude more direct routing designed to connect riders throughout the city, additionai circuiator routes to move peopie quickiy within the major hubs or activity centers within the city,and more frequent service for reduced wait times throughout the entire system. First,this section presents the recommended service and infrastructure/technoiogy pian for the next 10 years.Thereafter,a summary of the assumptions for capita[and operating costs used in deveioping the 10-year costs and revenues for the recommended pian are presented. Finaiiy,the impiementation pians and financiai piansforthe recommended 10-year transit pian are presented. C ir'\ ii CC II ini III ir'ove ini C in t The recommended Key Connections TDP 10-year service improvements were determined based on service priorities identified in Section 8 and carefui consideration of financiai resources and assumptions, as summarized cater in this section and continued in Section 10.Tabie 9-1 presents the service characteristics for the recommended 10-year Key Connections transit pian. Table 9-1: 10-Year Transit Plan Service Characteristics Operating Characteristics Service Service Span(Hours) Day of Improvement Frequency Weekday Saturday Sunday Service KWIC Connector 15 min (20 min at night) 15 15 12 Duval Loop 15 min (30 min 6-10 am) 18 18 18 Airport Connector 20 min 15 15 12 Old Town Loop 22 min 15 15 12 Mid Town Loop 25 min 15 15 12 New Town Loop 30 min 15 15 12 Every day North Connector 30 min 15 15 12 Stock Island 30 min 15 15 12 Circulator Modified Lower 90 min 15 15 12 Keys Shuttle Major Connector (Network, The major connector route network for the recommended 10-year pian for KWT is summarized beiow and wiii use iarger bus vehicies(switching to smaiier buses for cater night/cow ridership service) and wouid mostiy operate on major corridors in Key West. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 9-1 271 of 40L3017 N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% /////�/ %/ .// I a 09 l ��//��1yy KEY CONNEDMNS • KWIC Connector- Estabish 15-minute frequency service (20-minute service at night) between the new Key West IntermodaI Center(KWIC) and the KWT park-and-ride at Grinneii and Caroiine in Key West. • Airport Connector- Impiement connection from airport to Key West Transit park-and-ride at Grinnell and Caroline.The route begins at Seaside Drive near Ocean Walk apartments and would connect to airport and park-and-ride every 20 minutes. • North Connector-Service would begin at Seaside Drive near Ocean Walk apartments and travel mostly on N Roosevelt to end at park-and-ride at Grinnell and Caroline.Service would be offered every 30 minutes. • Modified Lower Keys Shuttle-Shuttle would terminate at KWIC and operate every 90 minutes,connecting the city regionally with Miami-Dade Transit at Marathon. Feeder IL...oe„ p/Circ�,,Aad:or Network, The feeder loop/circulator network for the major connector network is summarized below.These routes,except forthe current Duval Loop,would use smaller buses if and when available.The Duval Loop will continue to use larger buses due to ridership demand but would also use smaller buses at low ridership time periods or days. • Duval Loop-Continue the current Duval Loop with 15-minute frequency service (30-minute service from 6:00-10:00 AM) without any service changes. • New Town Loop-Add feeder loop to serve on and north of Kennedy Drive on the island with service every 30 minutes.The route will begin at the Overseas Market transfer location and would also serve the Senior Center transfer location. • Mid-Town Loop-Add a loop every 25 minutes to serve the area between Kennedy Drive and White Street and connect City Hall,the Senior Center, and the Overseas Market transfer location. • Old Town Loop-Add another loop to serve other areas of the Old Town every 22 minutes. • Stock Island Circulator-Add a new circulator to connect riders in Stock Island every 30 minutes to the proposed new KWIC facility,connecting them to the new KWIC Connector and the LKS routes. Cap I)it,a/IIIiifII astIl.0 t, ull / II :hInoI og Needs • Establish Key West Intermodal Center- Expand the current KWT facility in Stock Island to establish an intermodal center with bus transfer facilities and a park-and-ride for personal vehicles and tour buses. • Purchase smaller bus vehicles- Purchase smaller, non-CDL operator buses as fleet replacements to serve midtown, new town, and stock island loop/circulator.The smaller City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 9-2 272 of 40L3018 N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% /////�/ %/ .// I a 09 l ��//��1yy KEY CONNEDMNS buses will also be used at other routes once the ridership is low in off-peak periods,such as at night. • Explore implementing bus locator app- Explore implementing an app exclusively for KWT to allow users to locate bus stops and bus arrival times at those stops relative to where they a re. • Explore mobile fare payment- Explore establishing a mobile app for residents,commuters, and visitors. • Improve user-friendliness and convenience of using the system- Provide a simple-to- understand bus map display at most bus stops. :IIoh :y/ thCII'. Needs • Modification/enforcement of parking regulations-Work with the City of Key West to modify and enforce parking regulations to increase the cost of tour bus parking at the Coty Park-and-Ride so free parking at KWIC is used instead. In addition, parking costs for visitors should be increased to promote use of free parking at KWIC and use of city buses to get around the city. • Expand marketing/awareness campaign-Work with current advertising vendor to expand the current advertising program, including electronic displays of local information and key points of interest on buses such as restaurant and attraction ads by paid advertisers. In addition,work with interested advertisers to announce their business/location information when a bus reaches a stop close to those locations. • Establish program to allow free transit rides for hotel employee/guests-Work with city hotels and other establishments to allow free rides for their employees and visitors if they provide financial contribute to transit operations. 1.y..-y e a r. it Iin a in c i a III.:: I a in This section presents the capital and operating cost assumptions and the assumptions for projecting revenues to fund the previously-summarized 10-year Transit Plan for Key West.A summary of the costs and revenues by year also is presented. Cost Asss�,,s rn pti o n s Numerous cost assumptions were made to forecast transit costs from 2020 through 2029.These operating and capital costs assumptions are based on a variety of factors, including the 2019/2020 Transit System Budget forthe City of Key West,service performance data from current KWT services, information from other recent Florida transit plans,and discussions with KWT staff.These assumptions are summarized as follows: City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 9-3 273 of 40L3019 N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% %/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLII�IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLI� //// �� J �� I , � g(�6 u���������, �NN�,._ / , .// I a 09 if KEY CONN'EMNS • Based on information from KWT staff, an average annuai infiation rate of 4 percent was used for operating cost projections. • Based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI)-based inflation data for the last 10 years,from 2008 to 2018, an average annual inflation rate of 2 percent was used for ail operating cost projections. • Annual operating cost for the proposed bus services is based on the total revenue hours for each route multiplied by the costs per revenue hour.The cost per revenue hour was determined using 2018 NTD data for KWT.A cost of$71.15 per revenue hour(2018$) and the CPI-based inflation rate of 2 percent was used. • Large 35' Hybrid bus replacements are assumed to cost$680,000 each, based on information from KWT staff. Replacement small buses (22') are assumed to cost$70,000, based on recent bus purchase data available from FDOT's Transit Research Inspection Procurement Services (TRIPS) database for Florida transit agencies. • A vehicle replacement schedule is presented in Table 9-2.This schedule assumes purchase of 10 smaller 22' buses,4 Gillig 29' buses, and one 35' Hybrid bus as replacements in the next 10 years. Table 9-2:Vehicle Replacement Plan Year Small 22'Buses Regular 29'-35' 35'Hybrid Buses Buses 2020 0 4* 0 2021 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 2024 2 0 0 2025 0 0 0 2026 0 0 0 2027 3 0 0 2028 3 0 1 2029 2 0 0 Total 10 4 1 'Already programmed replacement.Not included in the TDP financial plan. • A 10-year total of$275,000 is assumed for continuing development and implementation of a Bus Stop Infrastructure Program to install signs, benches, bike racks,and shelters as needed. This includes$75,000 initially for the new system rollout and $25,000 per year thereafter. Revenues for the recommended Plan are based on information from the 2019/2020 Transit System Budget for the City of Key West,farebox performance data, and numerous discussions with MOT District 6 and KWT staff.The assumptions forTDP revenue sources forthe next 10 years includes the following: City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 9-4 274 of 40L3020 N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% /////�/ %/ .// I a 09 l ��//��1NSyy KEY CONNED� • Fare box revenues were assumed using a fare box recovery ratio of 11 percent, based on 2018 NTD data for KWT. However, no fares were assumed for the KWIC Connector and Duval Loop, which are assumed to be free of charge. • Annual revenues from Federal,State, and local sources included in the 2019/2020 KWT Budget were projected to continue and were inflated at two percent per year. • Additional advertising revenue due to the expanded advertising programs with the new system rollout is expected to generate an additional$75,000 per year(in 2021$). • Additional Federal grants for vehicle replacements was assumed to fund the purchase of the 10 smaller vehicles and one 35' Hybrid vehicle. • This plan assumes an additional FDOT operating funding at$1.6 million per year(2021$)to support implementation of the Key Connections plan in 2021.As discussed in detail in Section 10, KWT should work with FDOT District 6 to initiate this long-term operating assistance funding via the FTA Section 5311 program. • To leverage this potential new operating assistance from FDOT,this plan also assumes a 50 percent match at an additional$1.6 million (2021$) in City/iocai revenues. 1..0 Year Cos'tcz/Rf'.\/f'.III,,ies The costs and revenues summary developed for the Key Connections TDP by using these operating/capital.cost and revenue assumptions is summarized below. Figure 9-1 illustrates the operating and capital costs for the plan, and Figure 9-2 shows the total costs and revenues for the next 10 years.The detailed 10-year financial plan is presented in Table 93. Figure 9-1:Annual Operating and Capital Costs(millions) `9.0 Operating Costs IIIIIIIII Capital Costs $8 QHill / Y% $5.0 �o $2.0 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 City of Key West TDP Draft Report 9-5 275 of 40L3021 N / IIIIIU / /UIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII. / IIIIIIIIIIIIU // // //IIII IIIIIIIIIILLIIUIULIIIIILIILIIIIILIIILLUUI J %/,//% %/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLII�IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLI� //// �� J �� I , � g(�6 u���������, �NN�,._ / , .// I� a 09 if KEY CONN'EMNS Figure 9-2: Costs and Revenues(millions) `10.0 $9.0 IIIIIIIII..Fotac Cost Fotac IRever ue.s `7�7.0 $6.0 $5.0 `74..0 $0.0 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 City of Key West TDP Draft Report 9-6 276 of 40L3022 M N M p CI Hi h h Hi W Hi W Hi W Hi W Hi W Hi .y ti e r r r p N y rl Vi W N W Vi W yi W W h o NW l N O O O I EA W W W W o� O O O O O O O N W in in O� in y y 0 0� Yi Fn Yi Fn 0� 0� O Yi Yi j' /j ii O y •V � OW O» p o p � N � P m N W v�i � Om � O» P r r � � d' O p p o p N y e O W 01 n N N O O O P W W y y 0 0 m •� h vi h d d vi W W W W O h y Yi � Yi Vi M M y N d' - vi h h h h Yi Yi c� O c� O O O m Fn p� Yi vi Yi vi Yi `n O 0� 0� 0� y O N n N N M M M M W G G G w °J `i° ° c) a a 48 m � m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I@lu 1 KEY CONNFCrIONS 1.. ...Year..�..IC::; IC:� II itn III� itn in t q:ii in IC:q in The implementation plan in Table 9-4 outlines funded and unfunded improvements for KWT from 2020 through 2029.The table also shows the implementation years for funded improvements based on information available at this time. It is important to emphasize that the implementation schedule shown in the table does not preclude the opportunity to delay or advance any projects.As priorities change,funding assumptions do not materialize,or more funding becomes available,this project implementation schedule should be adjusted. Table 9-4: 10-Year Implementation Plan and Unfunded Needs Key Connection Network KWIC Connector 15 Min.(20 min.at night) 2021 Duval Loop 15 Min.(30 min.6 am-10 am) Ongoing Airport Connector 20 Min. 2021 Old Town Loop 22 Min. 2021 Mid Town Loop 25 Min. 2021 New Town Loop 30 Min. 2021 North Connector 30 Min. 2021 Stock Island Circulator 30 Min. 2021 Modified Lower Keys Shuttle 90 Min. 2021 Enhanced Frequency on Old Town, Mid Town, New Town Loops and Stock Island 15 Min. Unfunded Circulator Bus every45-min.on Modified Lower Keys 45 Min. Unfunded Shuttle Purchase Smaller Bus Vehicles 2020-2029 Explore Implementing Bus LocatorApp 2020 Explore Mobile Fare Payment 2020 Improve the User-Friendliness and convenience of Using the System 2020-2029 Establish Permanent Facility for Key West Intermodal Center(KWIC) Unfunded Implement Bus LocatorApp Unfunded Implement Mobile Fare Payment Unfunded Policy/Other Workwith City of Key Westto Modify and Enforce Parking Regulations 2020-2029 Expand Marketing/Awareness Campaign 2020-2029 Establish Program to Allow Free Transit Rides for Hotel Employee/Guests 2020-2029 City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 9-8 278 of 40L3024 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIV / Y MN ctiai I Illk'�)� II IIII IIII IIII iiiand Cour6 6bn Obtaining the support of decision makers who approve the budget required to impiement the TDP is oniy the first step in a conger process of bringing the TDP to fruition.This section provides key eiements to consider as Key West imp iements its pian to successfuiiy grow the system into the vision that is outlined in the TDP. ::;I t; 1p d In II�:: C Iiii Iiii C Iii a t'II Iii Due to inevitabie changes in operating environment,adoption of the TDP does not necessariiy mean KWT/Key Westwiii be aWe to adhere to the impiementation pian according to scheduie.The action items fisted beiow shouid be carefuiiy considered and foiiowed through to ensure that pubiic support and funding and operationai support are preserved untii the next major TDP update. • Funding"Plan of Action"-Address each recommendation and outline steps to take in the current year and succeeding years to secure the best chance possibie of obtaining the needed funding. • Operational Support- Establish a biueprintto determine how a recommended aiternative will be incorporated into the existing network from an operational perspective. • Progress beyond Adoption- Use the adopted TDP as a tool tojustify and explain the reasons for continued investments to transit services and facilities. • TDP Annual Progress Report- Use updates to provide needed motivation to reiterate the benefits of the recommended alternatives. Continued Promoting the TDP after adoption will improve the likelihood of achieving the implementation plan. KWT has already conducted extensive public outreach as part of the TDP process that can be expanded to market other planning efforts,such as service initiation efforts, marketing programs and campaigns, and budget plans.The branding used for the TDP can serve as the foundation for a post- TDP marketing campaign,which can be developed for the full TDP or for individual recommendations. :° 'y ConncVionsxecudve Su im ma ry Promotion of the TDP should extend beyond the adoption of the TDP.The Key Connections TDP Executive Summary,which will be completed after plan adoption,should be used as a promotional tool and an effective medium to continue generating support for the TDP's recommendations. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 10-1 279 of 40L3025 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y CMNFC71ONS : u Uhn g on ...IL..II�. II" ff IIl � W:it n h it 16 Throughout the TDP public involvement process, KWT identified advocates while educating the public overall and can leverage these relationships to continue building support for the implementation strategies.These individuals may serve as facilitators for a "grassroots"outreach program or could become transit cheerleaders/ambassadors that can provide a foundation/support network for future outreach.These future efforts can build upon the tools and lessons afforded by the TDP and aid in prioritizing specific target markets to engage. In the future, KWT should consider coordination of the TDP major updates with other planning efforts: • Comprehensive Operational Analysis(COA) -With potential implementation of regularly- scheduled transit, it is recommended that KWT consider a service efficiency assessment in 3-5 years after the new system launch and repeat it at least every years to maintain operational health. Effective coordination on the timing of a COA may be beneficial in the goal to provide efficient transit services.The findings of a COA can be fed into the capital and operational recommendations for the initial years of the 10-year plan so that near-term system improvements can beset. • Coordination with Other Plans- Ensuring consistency with key State, regional, and local plan priorities should be a primary focus of Key Connections.Coordinating the timing of the TDP with the new Transit Asset Management Plan requirement should be considered, as both plans are designed to govern investment strategies based on needs. • Informing Other Plans-The analyses completed during Key Connections can be used to help update required puns forADA access and Title VI service provisions,as it documents how the system will meet or serve older adults, persons with disabilities, and populations that fall under Title VI protections.The adopted TDP can also be useful for other entities with subsequent punning efforts,such as local comprehensive puns, puns to develop affordable housing, and Florida's SIS Needs Plan. Implementing the plan will require the actions generally outlined above; however,following are several key steps to get implementation in motion and to move forward successfully. During the first year after adoption, Key West staff should engage in the following: Prior to and N,irhng Cow IKey IBridge Consd:n,xtie„ n (20.1.. ....202:1..) • Meet with FDOT District 6 office leadership to fully understand and identify the impact of the Cow Key Bridge construction. Discussion should lead to the implementation of options that City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 10-2 280 of 40L3026 IIII IIIIIIIIII_. I / IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVV���� �� ���� � � � r VUUUVUVVVUUV�OUVU�VU r rrrrrj ����j�rr r %% r r/�r�rr JJ rrr� llrr��l➢ �rr . r would minimize interruptions and/or route scheduling/operations.The parameters of the construction project include the following impacts and potential considerations: — Reduced lanes,from two in each direction to alternating with two onto and one off in the AM and one on and two off in the PM, limiting the lanes for KWT's direct access to their Stock Island facilities and any connection to the Lower Keys Shuttle. — Limited turning movements at S College Road,with right-turn-only and no/limited signahzation, requiring KWT to reroute existing services, limit connections, and increasing deadhead or redundant services. — Increased turning activity with full signahzation at N College Road competing with potential routing alternatives planned by KWT. • Develop and implement alternative routing/facilities during the Cow Key Bridge construction duration,from approximately April 2020 through May/June 2021 (expected completion). Initial thoughts on route adjustments include the following: — Changing the southern terminus of the Lower Keys Shuttle to Stock Island and improving the transfers/connections to other routes going into Key West. — Potential Transit Signal Priority(TSP) applications on US-1 at S College Road on Stock Island and Roosevelt Boulevard in Key West. — Potential use of shoulder on Cow Key Bridge and approaches as a bus-only or bus and right-turn-only lane. — Immediate or expedited development of the KWIC (while using current facility temporarily until a new and expanded permanent facility is complete) on Stock Island,with park-and- ride opportunity to help reduce traffic going into Key West, provide a transfer point for transit routes, and provide a focal point for other transportation demand strategies. — Discuss with District 6 staff the need and source of funding to develop the KWIC bus-only lane and TSP application,as well as temporary operating funding to successfully implement route changes and improvements. • Start a marketing/awarenesscampaign, including targeting meetings, activities,events, and other venues at which to share the Executive Summary and provide details of the planned transit growth to educate the community and leaders while keeping the momentum of the TDP process and effort fresh and moving ahead.These may include homeowner/senior/community associations,civic clubs,service organizations,elected and/or appointed boards or committees, public events or festivals, and/or other locations as identified. • Meet with FDOT District 6 Commuter Services program staff to develop a plan of action for commuter programs in Key West,especially for workers accessing Key West via US-1. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 10-3 281 of 40L3027 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y CMNFC71ONS • Identify potential grants and apply for funding to implement transit alternatives, and use the information provided in the TDP to develop project applications,including defining/describing the projects,justifying needs, providing service and operational parameters,outlining a proposed budget, and providing performance measures.These efforts should include FDOT District 6 coordination for temporary or unusual sources due to the construction project. N,irhng and AfterG:ow IKey IBridge G:;ornpl,etie„ n (2023.- 0 ) • Continue the marketing/awareness campaign, assess where additional efforts would be beneficial, and develop plans to initiate. • Work with District 6 to initiate long-term funding via the FTA Section 5311 program.With no urban funding available, KWT is dependent on the FDOT to provide Federal funding opportunities for capital and operating their transit system. D6 has been supportive by transferring funding into the 5311 (Rural Public Transportation) program and has indicated consideration to increasing the level of funding with the City's commitment of additional funding and improved services. • Submit applications for funding as identified to implement alternatives included in the implementation plan and/or unfunded needs list. • Develop apermanentKeyWestlntermodal Centeras a primaryfaciiity/hub on Stock Island with ample park-and-ride spaces,direct bus route connections, bus,trolley, and/or tram transfers, potential water-borne access, and other services as identified. • Working with District 6 Commuter Services program staff, identify and approach major employers to initiate employee commuter programs,sale of passes,introduction of new routes, and/or other commute options to improve access to current and emergingjobs. • Working with City leadership, plan and implement at[east the minimum projects and/or expanded services as approved in the TDP Implementation Plan and identify adequate local funding to leverage potential revenue increases from FDOT and/or other sources. • Plan and implement the Restructured Transit System as identified in Key Connections,with a launch date after the completion of the Cow Key Bridge construction.This would include modifying routes for more direct connector services, new circulator or loop services, and enhanced services for the Lower Keys Shuttle.This would include a detailed Operations Service Plan. • Develop an introduction and marketing strategy for the revamped KWT system specifically outlining how the new system will be introduced and what rollout events will be conducted to involve community members and ensure awareness throughoutthe city.The marketing strategy will include ongoing goals,strategies, and efforts to maintain momentum. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 10-4 282 of 40L3028 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y CONNFC71ONS • Assess and prepare/implement anADA Transition Plan for bus stop and faciiity accessibiiity, especiaiiy in light of expanded and restructured services and the new facilities and stops required for implementation of Key Connections. • Prepare and submit annual progress reports using the preparation and approval process to continue the annual progress updates to the adopted Key Connections TDP. • Complete a Comprehensive Operations Analysis(COA)for the restructured KWT system within four years of the rollout of the new system to ensure that operations are efficient and provide ample opportunities for regular riders and visitors. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report 10-5 283 of 40L3029 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. IRMO / II IIIIIIIIIIII� MFV IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII. IIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIV / WN r r IIIIIIII iiii IIIII iiii IIII iiii IIIII iiii City of Key West TDP I Draft Report A-1 284 of 40L3030 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y MN 37,000 I31T 36,000 I..Z Rider III 35,000 cul. jjw� BMT 34,000 � Rc:T 33,000 32,000 a 50,000 1.00,000 1.50,000 200,000 31,000 201.4 201.5 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISewiceAreaPopulation I...inew (Pee Mean) y 600 ➢, [ 0 500 �- c:VJ I.E. � 400 BMT 200 RC T QQIIQQIIQQIIQQ.QQ.QQ.QQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQIIQQ.((IQ�ffIQQ,((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQ,((IQQ,ffIQQ,((IQQ,ffIQQII((IQQIIffIQQII((IQQIIff,ff,ffI ffI ffI ffI ffI ffI ffI ff.ffI ffI ml IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I��I��I��I��I��I��I��I��I��I��I�� � ➢.00 0 200 400 600 800 0 Thousands IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPassenge: Trips I...inew (Pee. Mean) nVln i i i n inn n i 60 I31 T INS= 1111 m a I..Z Rider I 0 40 cu I. III I 30 BMT I H 20 RC III 1.0 0 20 40 60 0 Thousands 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(Revenue Hours I...inew (Pee Mean) City of Key West TDP I Draft Report A-2 285 of 40L3031 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y MN 2.05 131 T t'C:8 2.00 III 0 1.95 C4J I �[ 9..90 �r 19M1 1.85 IRCT III i 1.80 1.75 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 €,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISe vice AY ea Den siLy I...inew (Pee Mean) illln i n i�n n i 800 BTT IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINOMM 700 EZ Rider 600 CUE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMEM 500 400 BMT IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�II� III 300 RC r ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ffQQ�ff 200 MNT ➢.00 0 0 200 400 600 800 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thousands IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII R even a e M il4es $4.00 131 T 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII((((((f(f 1..Z Rides II 100 C U... r r $2.00 BM1 RC $1 00 VCWT $0.00 0 ➢. 2 3 4 201.4 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIToka I OpemLing MiilHiolns City of Key West TDP Draft Report A-3 286 of 40L3032 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y MN �illillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilliilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilli��m 1,21 i i El. m m S 25 131 T I.Z Rider 1.5 131M1 1.0 RCl ff ffffppffff((,.ff ffffQ.ffff.((��,ffQ.ffffp,.ff f,((.ffffffQ,ff.((((((��.ff ffffppffff((ffffffQ.ff ff.((��ffQ.ffffppffff((.ff fff.Offff((-((Qff ff((��ffOffffppff ff(,f�l VC W T �I�IIIII�II�I�IIOI�IIIIIIOIIIII�II�I�IIOI�OI�IIIIII�IIIII�II�I�IIOI�IIIIIIOIIIII�II�I�IIOI�IIIOI�IIIIIIOIIIII�II�� 0 0 S 1.0 ➢.S 20 25 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVehicles Opera Led in IMaximun]Service. I...inew (Pee Mean) 20 131 T III all, v' ./IRICieY ➢.S C u I.E.1.0 131MT RCT QQ�QQQQQQIQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ S VCWT �II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II 0 1.0 20 30 0 201.4 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IPa sserng er Trips Pe Capita I...inew (Pee Mean) 1.4 131-T 1.2 1.Z Rider" r 131MT ��� .... .. 6 RC III �i 4 ml- IIIIIIII�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�I�I�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�IOI�I�O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O��O���O��O��O��O��O��O��O�P 0 S 1.0 ➢.S 20 2 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Passenger Trips Per (Revenue dour 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1...inew (Pee Mean) City of Key West TDP I Draft Report A-4 287 of 40L3033 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y MNF N- p..O 131-T 0.8 I-:Z Rider 0.6 131MT III ..... 0.4 RC:1 0.2 ml �II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II� �0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0��0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�00� 0.0 0 5 1.0 1.5 20 201.4 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(Revenue Miles Pe CapiLa I...inew (Pee Mean) 1.2 131-T �l ....., M 1.0 I-.Z Rider low 8 cu I.E. �� ..... ���.... IIIIIIIIIIII ,,.... , 6 131MT IVIIIIIIIIIII 4 IRCT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQffQQ.ffQQffQQffQQ''QQQQQQQQQQQQVQQQQQQQQQQ��',ffQQ..ffQQ..ffQQ�(( , 2 VC W l �II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�`J 0 2 4 6 8 1.0 a 2014 2015 2016 201.7 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Avemg e Ag e of UleeL(in yews) I...inew (Pee. Mean) 131 T I ( 1::2 Rider IM $€0 $60 131MT II SM� $40 IRC1 Q���IppQQ ppQQ ppQQ �QQ a 2 0 V<W 1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII C3fremLing;l-.xpense Pec Capika I...i n e w (Pee Mean) City of Key West TDP Draft Report A-5 288 of a 0L3034 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. / / II IIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / ICI " Ell 9 wlvi h � $12 130 III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIQ,((((((((��f $10 I Z Rider U ICI!r $8 cul III 131M1 III RC1 III �2 mwl IIIII�I«��1�I11111��I�11�I�I�III��I�11�I�I�III��I�II�II�III��I�11�I�I�III��I�11�I�I�III��I�11�I�I�III��I�11�0��1�I11111��I�II�I�I�III��I�II�I�I�III��I�II�I�IV� $a $0 a2 $4 aga 8 $10 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Operating;Expense Per Passenger Trig 2f�:p.4 2f�:p.�r 2f�:p.Ca 2f�:p.A 2f�:p.g3 I...inear (Peer Mean) A 13TT 6 1:2 Rider III.......,., ii $5C���1$4 13 MT RC�1 II u<w1 a 1.. $0 $0 $2 4 Aga 8 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII C per a ftg;1 xpense Per Revenue Mile I...inear (Peer Mean) ul'�w�� uuim��i li�i'l1 iuuhlpu�p���" I".,' $120 100 131-T w,,, " � ,, EZ Rider $80 cly r $20 a- $0 $50 a100 2WA 2WA 2WA 2M7 2M8 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Operating;Expense Per Revenue dour I...inear (Peer Mean) City of Key West TDP I Draft Report A-6 289 of a 0L3035 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low Iff Y MNF N- �I I- 25 131-T 20 1.5 c:iI. IIII r IIII 1.0 131M1 r RC:,ml- IIII 0 201.4 201.5 2016 2017 2018 0 10 20 30 40 IIIIIIIIL Fwc.box IRecove. y(%) I...inew (Pee. Mean) y 1. 131 T 6 1.Z ideo $1.20 cUI... 13M1 $0.80 $0.60 IRCT $0.40 $0.20 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 111111111111111111111111111 Avemp Fwe I...inew Peet Mean) City of Key West TDP I Draft Report A-7 290 of 40L3036 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. IRMO / II IIIIIIIIIIII� MFV IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII. IIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIV / WN IIIIIIII IIIII Farebox Rep art City of Key West TDP I Draft Report B-1 291 of 40L3037 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y CffNFCr10N9 lii li`l Lj a l 1F.'ar-el.)ox Il C 0 lry IIl a t i 0 II II')O lr t Key es . ran sit IfFixed lRm,ite IM,,is y sd:ern, IKey West, Ifs orida .h,Ay 201.. Current Forebox Recovery Ratio The farebox recovery ratio (FRR) for Key West Transit(KWT),the public transportation provider for the City of Key West,was 11 percent in FY 2018.This number shows a 46 percent decrease over the five- year period from FY 2014 to FY 2018. However,this decline is primarily due to the addition of fare-free Duval in [ate 2017. Friar Year Fare Studies and Changes The last KWT fare change was impiemented in 2011.As a result,the current fuii fare on the fixed-route system is$2.00, $1.00 for reduced fare, and $0.50 for seniors. Fares for the Lower Key Shuttle remained the same for the fuii fare and reduced fare,$4.00 and $2.00, respectively.The senior fare decreased from $1.50 to$1.00 for seniors on the Lower Keys Shuttle.The Duval Loop was implemented in 2017 as a fare-free service to serve the Old Town area. Strategies that[Alill Affect Forebox Recovery Ratio The 2020-2029 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update identifies strategies that will be used to maintain or increase the farebox recovery ratio, including the following: • Monitor key performance measures for individual routes. • Ensure that transit serves major activity centers and parking garages, potentially increasing the effectiveness of service. • Increase ridership through enhanced marketing and community relations activities. • Form partnerships with local hotels and employers with incentives fortransit use. • Improve attractiveness of service to riders through implementation of technology. • Monitor opportunities to secure additional funding to improve frequencies on existing routes and attract new riders. • Prioritize routes to add additional buses to improve frequencies, improve the customer experience,and attract new riders. • Meet with cities in the Lower Keys to form partnerships for funding improved transit service along the Overseas Highway. • Conduct on-board surveys every three years to gather information on how to make services more convenient and useful to patrons. • Complete ongoing preventative maintenance activities and replace fareboxes as needed to ensure the fare collection equipment is performing at optimum capacity. City of Key West TDP I Draft Report B-2 292 of 40L3038 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. IRMO / II IIIIIIIIIIII� MFV IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / WN IIII IIII Invd4enient IL iiri IIIL City of Key West TDP Draft Report C-1 293 of 40L3039 City of Key West � Transit Development Plan 2020-2029 Public Involven-ient Plan Droft November 2018 Prepared for Prepared bII` Tindale IM Oliver � INYRODUCIJON Key West Transit,the transit agency serving the city of Key West and adjacent areas, is preparing its 10-year Transit Development Pian (TDP),which will provide a guide ford eve[opment of the transit system over the next 10 years.As required by State statute,this is a major update to its TDP,which is required every five years.The update covers FY 2020 through 2029. The Public Involvement Plan (PIP) provides an overview of the public outreach activities that will be undertaken aspart of the TDP process.The PIP is designed to comply with TDP State statutory requirements. Rule 14-73.001 requires that the TDP preparation include the following activities: • A PIP approved by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and also approved by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). • Description of the process used and the public involvement activities undertaken. • Solicitation of comments from FDOT and the regional Workforce Development Board (i.e., CareerSource Research Coast) on the mission,goals,objectives, alternatives,and 10-year implementation program. • Notification of all public meetings at which the TDP is presented to or discussed with FDOT and the regional Workforce Development Board. Although the City of Key West is not under thejurisdiction of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO),some aspirational strategies established by most MPOs in Florida emphasize that the overall public participation strategy should,to the maximum extent possible, (1) hold public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times, (2) employ visualization techniques to describe transportation plans and programs, and (3) make public information available in an electronically- accessible format,such as the City's website, as appropriate,to afford reasonable opportunities for consideration of public comment and opinion. T U LI C INVOLVEMENTPROCESS The public involvement process for the development of the TDP seeks Key West Transit user and non- user public input on transit needs, priorities, and implementation strategies to enhance public transportation in the City of Key West and the region.As part of an effort to use the TDP process to improve Key West Transit's services,this outreach effort will ensure that a broad range of groups is consulted as part of the process, including passengers,stakeholders,social service providers, bus operators, and the general public. Additionally,Commuter Services of South Florida (SFCS) (the FDOT District 4 and 6joint rideshare program)will be available to assist in additional outreach activities for the TDP.These activities may include targeted workshops and/or community events and will be noted in the applicable sections later in the PIP. City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 1 295 of 40L3041 Key Obl'JeCO'Ves The objectives of the TDP PIP inciude the foiiowing: • To deveiop a muiti-faceted communication mode[that wiii keep the genera[ pubiic and aii stakehoider groups informed about the status of the project. • To cieariy define the TDP purpose and objectives eariy in the process. • To identify and document the concerns, issues, and needs of key stakehoiders. • To provide stakehoiders with baseiine information about the current state of Key West Transit and keep them fuiiy informed throughout the study. • To encourage participation of aii stakehoider groups within the project area whiie paying speciai attention to underserved communities. • To provide frequent opportunities and a consistent access point for community input. • To identify toois to gather information from stakehoiders who cannot participate in meetings, such as via websites,emaii,oniine surveys,sociai networking toois,etc. • To respond to community questions and comments when requested and provide contact information. Phases ail° I'L P OUtivach The City of Key West's approach to this TDP's outreach consists of two phases: • Phase I—Key West Transit wiii conduct outreach to the community to seek pubiic input on transit needs, inciuding service and capita[/infrastructure needs for the next 10 years. Discussion group workshops,stakehoider interviews, bus rider and operator surveys, and website/emaii/sociai media communications wiii be part of this phase. • Phase II—Foiiowing extensive evaivation of the input received and deveiopment of recommendations,additionai outreach wiii occur to seek pubiic input(via a pubiic input survey, pubiic iistening sessions, and website/emaii/sociai media communications) on the recommendations,inciuding service, priorities, and impiementation strategies to enhance pubiictransportation in Key West. PUBLIC I I Eel EN"I' . "'I'I I'l'IES Numerous pubiic invoivementtechniques were seiected for inciusion in the PIP to ensure the active participation of the community.Tabie 1 presents the types of activities that wiii be compieted for the TDP and the toois associated with each type of activity. The remainder of this section summarizes these activities in detaii,inciuding composition of the various committees,workshops, and audiences for each of the activities aiong with an anticipated timeiine for compietion by month. City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 2 296 of 40L3042 Table 1 TDP Public Involvement Activities Activity TDP PIP Project Review/Coordination Meetings ✓ Website Communications ✓ Social Media Networking&Email Outreach ✓ Collateral Materials Flyers&informational items ✓ ✓ &Visual Aids Branding Visual aids ✓ Bus rider/operator surveys ✓ Stakeholder interviews ✓ Community Discussion group workshops ✓ Engagement,Review Paper&online surveys ✓ &Comment public workshops ✓ Email, mail,in-person,and telephone ✓ comments Agency Coordination Regional coordination ✓ Regional,County and City officials ✓ A kickoff meeting for the project was held to discuss the project scope, project schedule, milestones, and deiiverabies.The following items were key topics on the agenda: • Discuss TDP goals and objectives-what this plan should achieve. • Review project tasks and deiiverabies. • Discuss project coordination and review meetings. • Discuss strategy for public involvement efforts. During this meeting,the Project Team clarified the high-level objectives for the TDP and how they can fit in with other planning efforts in Key West.Additionally, keytimeiines, particularly for near-term anticipated completion dates,were discussed and clarified,and a substantial discussion took place regardingthe composition and timeline forthe public involvement activities. S"0" /1 In addition to the kickoff meeting,three meetings with Key West Transit staff and representatives of any other agency invited by Key West Transit are scheduled for the duration of the TDP planning process.These meetings will be conducted to provide an update on the project progress and discuss any deliverables/input on the TDP. City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 3 297 of 40L3043 In addition,one meeting with the Parking and Aiternative Transportation Group (PATG), a volunteer group formed to heip the Key West City Commission find solutions to parking and traffic congestion issues in the downtown area, is panned to obtain their input on transit in Key West. all The Project Team wiii work with City staff to deveiop and impiement a brand to used uring the deveiopment of the 2020-2029 TDP. Buiiding a TDP brand is an important step toward making the punning and pub iic invoivement processes more recognizabie to the pubiic.To meet the campaign goai of increased pub iic awareness, a variety of strategies and objectives wiii be deveioped, inciuding, but not iimited to,the foiiowing: • Create a brand iogo and coior schemes for branding. • Associate branding with aii key TDP materiai, inciuding pubiic notices,fiyers, presentations, reports,dispiays,websites, and sociai media. The Project Team wiii conduct interviews with representatives of key pubiic and private sector organizations to obtain feedback about pubiic transportation issues, needs, necessary service enhancements, and priorities.This is a key component of the pubiic invoivement effort and wiii enhance the understanding of iocai conditions from those who reiy on or who work with others who reiy on transitto getto and from work or to conduct important trips. Up to 10 stakehoider interviews wiii be conducted.Stakehoiders wiii be provided with a briefing packet that wiii inciude information on the purpose of the TDP,ways to stay invoived, and other pertinent information. Prior to conducting the interviews,a draft interview questionnaire wiii be submitted to Key West Transit for review and approvai.The interviews wiii be scheduied in advance and conducted either in person or by phone,whichever is preferred bythe interviewee. 011 BOM'd SUINCY A bus on-board survey wiii be conducted on 100 percent of Key West Transit's scheduied fixed-route bus runs for typicai weekday and Saturday service to obtain information reiated to demographic City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 4 298 of 40L3044 attributes,travel behaviors, and rider satisfaction of current riders forma rket research purposes.This information wiii enable Key West Transit to focus on relevant transit needs and issues such as modifying bus schedules, locating bus stops, modifying the fare structure, planning for future service, focusing on marketingcampaigns,and identifying historicaitrends in rider satisfaction. The on-board survey methodology and implementation will be coordinated closely with agency staff to ensure that study objectives are met and data collection efforts are efficiently integrated with the agency's operations. In addition, Key West Transit's most recent survey questionnaire will be consulted to promote consistency of questions.The completed on-board surveys are expected to cover a sample of all routes and runs for all times of day for a representative weekday and Saturday of service levels.The survey will accommodate English and Spanish languages,as necessary. In support of this effort,the following activities will be completed: • Use electronic tablets to facilitate the collection of data during the survey process. • Collection of a sufficient amount of data to meet sampling requirements. • Organization of collected data according to route. • Assurance that all bus riders have an equal chance to complete a survey. • Compilation of cross tab reports and statistics. • Assurance of quality control and accuracy standards throughout the on-board survey effort. The Project Team will plan for and conduct two group interview sessions with bus operators.The session will include open-ended discussion about what the operators consider to be key needs and priorities for Key West Transit.Additionally, a short survey will be administered and collected to ensure that details are gathered related to specific route improvements and other potential needs. The Project Team will conduct two public input surveys for the TDP.The Phase I survey will be a survey of the general public(targeting non-riders)to obtain information related to attitudes, latent demand, and general support of the community related to public transit services and to augment findings of the on-board survey.The Phase II survey will be conducted after the development of potential service alternatives for the TDP. Both surveys will be available online,through social media, and in hard copy formats.Access to the online versions will be provided via [inks on the City, Key West Transit, and other websites, as available.Atabiet-based and/or hard copy format will be provided at City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 5 299 of 40L3045 workshops, listening sessions,and partnering agencies. Participants will be encouraged to complete the surveys via tablets to improve the ease and accuracy of data collection and reporting. Email-blasts,social media,and websites will be used to promote the online survey effort. In addition, participants attending the discussion groups will be requested to disseminate the survey links. Participants of the stakeholder interviews will be asked to distribute the link through their places of business, and agency and City staff will distribute the link through other means, as appropriate. r Two discussion group workshops will be scheduled and held at different locations in the city to ensure representation that is geographically distributed.These workshops typically will involve a smaller group of participants (8-12 persons) in an intimate meeting setting that promotes more in-depth, open-ended discussion about issues, needs,and opportunities from the perspectives of non-users.To generate interest and participation,the Project Team will work with agency staff to identify and invite potential participants to each workshop. Each discussion group will be attended by participants of similar backgrounds to provide for more robust discussion. (Two additional workshops may also be conducted with the assistance from SFCS to engage the communities served and riders using the Lower Keys Shuttle.This service connects bus riders to Key West from Marathon and further north with a connection to Miami-Dade Transit.) 6 The Project Team will facilitate two open house-style public workshops at different locations as part of the TDP outreach process.These will be held as standalone events at locations where the general public gathers,such as shopping malls,or at transit hubs to obtain input from the general public about the TDP update process. Both sessions will be planned early in the process to collect input on transit needs and necessary service and capital improvements.These sessions will include displays and interactive information exchange, printed and tablet-based public input surveys, and enlistment for social media.They will be designed to capture information from seasonal and permanent residents about community values, needs, and priorities. City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 6 300 of 40L3046 /��� it i//ioi//ail/ion ii% ✓ ii�,/ir ii i /; i//i ,% �i / i// i Two additional.open-house public workshops will be hosted to solicit feedback regarding TDP alternatives and priorities in Phase II of the TDP outreach process.These workshops will occur l.ater in the TDP publ.ic involvement process to illustrate proposed transit service alternatives to the publ.ic. The workshops will use maps,fact sheets, and other visuals and a survey to provide an opportunity to the publ.ic to offer input on the effectiveness of the transit alternatives proposed to address the needs of the communities served by the Key West Transit. The Project Team will coordinate with Key West Transit staff toplan and schedule each workshop to target appropriate venues.To maximize opportunities for citizen participation, l.ocations wil.l. be selected to ensure geographic coverage.The second public input survey, in both printed and tablet form,will be administered at these workshops to obtain comments and input on the proposed transit alternatives. (DillRev ew ('011"111"1clit; and SL14;TMgCSdO11S FL'aLm Key West (_ �4'/eli.s The Project Team wi[i review any available comments and suggestions collected and provided by Key West Transit from Key West citizens (riders and non-riders) regarding existing and future transit services in the city for consideration in the TDP.The major themes and topics of this feedback will be summarized as part of the TDP's public outreach. �i///O%/�// ,�J%,'�% ✓i J�,ill l/ ��� � J �vil.% %,� JII1J f, /i ii���////����i»�l//ff��/��.. r The Project Team will develop content for social media such as Facebook and/or Twitter.After consultation with agency staff,the content will be provided to Key West Transit for posting on its Facebook and Twitter accounts. It is envisioned that posts to social media will occur as necessary or as requested by Key West Transit staff. a %// „,//// a aD irraooi ✓ iii / rrai/i i/ - rr ✓ ,,,//oip/off/ 000i0000// City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 7 301 of 40L3047 The Key West Transit website wiii also be used as a platform to distribute information on the TDP process and any upcoming public outreach events.The Project Team will provide information, inciudingfiyers/notices on public workshops, [inks to public input surveys,and any project materials as appropriate to Key West Transit staff for posting on the website. In addition,contact information will be provided on the website so the public can engage directly with Key West Transit staff or the Project Team. Additionally,the Project Team will facilitate the dissemination of emaRs to key contacts within the community,as provided by Key West Transit staff,to provide information and updates similar to that available on the TDP web page.The Project Team will coordinate with Key West Transit staff and develop content for the e-mail blasts to: • Encourage participation in online survey/outreach events in Phase I of TDP outreach. • Notify recipients of Phase II of TDP outreach and the TDP transit priorities survey (a�' Two PowerPoint presentations of the TDP will be developed and conducted at publicly-advertised meetings after drafts have been reviewed by Key West Transit staff.One presentation will be used to educate elected officials about the TDP and its processes and obtain their input and direction on the future of transit in Key West for the next 10 years.The other will be conducted at the end of the TDP process to present the TDP and obtain approval from the City.These presentations will be scheduled and made as directed by Key West Transit staff. i/iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i� i � In addition to the activities summarized previously,the Project Team will coordinate with SFCS on potentially conducting grassroots outreach events/additional open house workshops at community events and other applicable locations. As part of the public outreach effort,flyers,fact sheets, and other materials also will be developed as public involvement tools to distribute information about public outreach activities and upcoming public workshops,facilitate education about the Key West Transit system during outreach events, and provide participants with a means for asking questions. Potential public involvement tools and resources include the following: City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 8 302 of 40L3048 • Fact sheets will include information to distribute to the public at outreach events and public workshops and will offer an overview of the TDP and Key West Transit and promote the value and importance of public involvement.They also will direct and encourage the public to reach out to Key West Transit staff to share questions and concerns. • Media releases will be prepared and provided to the City Public Information Office for distribution,as appropriate. • Flyers will be developed to share information with the public, provide TDP updates, and educate the public on the public involvement process and the value of their participation. Flyers will direct the public to visit the TDP website and the branded Facebook and Twitter pages to stay involved with and informed about the development of the TDP. • Project presentations that are user-friendly and graphical will be developed to support the communication and adoption of the TDP and will be available for use by Key West Transit staff beyond adoption of the TDP. • Display boards will include exhibits such as service and demographic maps, plan proposals, and more at public workshops. 001Table 2 Event Anticipated Date Project Coordination/Review Meetings February-June 2019 Stakeholder Interviews December 2018 On Board Survey January 2019 Bus Operator Interviews January 2019 Phase I - Public Input Survey January-February 2019 Phase I - Public Workshops February 2019 Discussion Group Workshops February 2019 Phase 11 - Public Workshops April 2019 Phase 11 - Public Input Survey April-May 2019 Social Media Outreach May 2019 Web/Email Outreach May 2019 Project Presentations June 2019 City of Key West TDP I Public Involvement Plan 9 303 of 40L3049 r / Sri r / / � r 10) „ro r / m i.r r� a !r/ LL CIL mee. uacofr ling I 3050 1 TE R I l ug Q IE 110 i 2020-20,29 KEY WEST 11YI-' U~11URU~OSE: OF UHI'TEME: • Working with the City of Key West to develop 10-year transit development plan (TDP)for the Key West Transit that meet FDOT requirements for state funding eligibility. • As part of the TDP process, meetings are held with members of the local business and political community to gauge their awareness of current public transit, as well as garner input as to need and viability of transit services in the county. • The TDP also serves as an opportunity to discuss improvements that might be needed to the transit system and to discuss initiatives for future system growth. BACKGROUND UHFORU A;TM • A TDP is a strategic guide for public transportation development in the City of Key West. • The TDP: o Evaluates existing services, o Reviews demographic information of riders and their travel behaviors, o Summarizes local community and transit policies and priorities, o Gauges public perception through accessible activities for the general public and interested parties, o Compares the local transit system or community to other similar systems, and o Reviews performance of the local system. • It is a ten-year implementation plan which provides recommendations on: o How,where, when, and if new transit services should be introduced to the transit system, and, o Adjusting, removing, or improving aspects of the transit system that may not be adequately serving the public or that is not meeting performance measures. • Finally, a ten-year financial plan is constructed as part of the TDP that: o Estimates costs of existing and new services, and, o Projects known and potential revenues. • Although transit systems are required to submit a TDP to FDOT,TDPs can also be very useful as they provide a review of the current transit system, provide a forum for public input, recommendations for improvements, and outline the cost of improvements. • TDPs are not budgets or CIPs and do not necessarily bind decision-makers to elements of the TDP. However, great effort is put into developing a comprehensive overview of the transit system and planning for the future needs of the general public that can: o Encourage residents, businesses, and government officials to support and advocate use of public transportation, o Use transit to improve/manage congestion in the local area o Promote sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation, and o Provide transportation options that improve overall quality of life of residents • Candid discussions and continued participation from stakeholders in the transit development process allows: o Decision-makers to become more knowledgeable about the transit planning process and, 305 of 40L3051 o The City to construct and support a plan that not only has input from the public, private and government sector, but helps foster consensus in the decision-making process ("everyone is on the same page"). NTEWEW QUESTONS 1. Are you currently aware of Key West's public transit system (Key West Transit) and its services? 2. Do you use Key West Transit? Why? Why not? 3. Who do you believe uses the transit system? (Workers, Students, Unemployed, Elderly, Tourists/Visitors) 4. What groups of travelers seem to experience the most difficult transportation conditions (elderly, tourists, commuters, the disabled, low-income, etc.)? Why? 5. What type of transit services would you like to see more of in Key West? (More Frequent Fixed-Route, Vanpools,Trolley, Increased Weekend Service, Late Evening Service, micro- transit (on-demand smaller bus with app), subsidized rideshare, autonomous bus). 6. Is there a need for more service in core areas currently served by Key West Area Transit in the City of Key West and the Lower Keys? Is there a need for transit service in other areas of Monroe County? 7. What do you think are the most significant transportation issues in Key West? 8. Do you believe that public transportation can relieve congestion and parking problems in the City of Key West? 9. What do you think are the most significant issues for current and potential transit users in Key West? 10. What are reasonable passenger fares for transit service? 11. What are the major destinations within your immediate community? 12. What are the major destinations outside of your community where people are traveling to, from your area? 13. Is more regional transportation needed to connect the City of Key West with surrounding areas (Lower Keys, Middle Keys, Upper Keys, Miami, etc.)? 14. Are you willing to pay additional local taxes for an expanded transit system? 15. What types of local funding sources should be used to increase transit service in the future? (i.e. private partnerships, fare increases, ad valorem tax, sales tax, gas tax) 16. Where do you see Key West Transit ten years from now? 17. Do you believe Key West Transit has done an effective job providing transit service? 18. Do you believe Key West Transit has done an effective job marketing transit service options? 306 of 40L3052 19. Are you supportive of Land Development Codes and policies that require coordination of and funding for transit services that connect to and support land uses that promote transit oriented developments within the community? 307 of 40L3053 a KEY WEST TRANSIT WANTS YOUR �INPUTI, IlKey West irrmsirt i Year tirains"t t evelq1purrizum't w i�'�Ill�rurm Public Transit Workshops The City of Key West and Key West Transit (KWT) is planning for its future, and we want your input! Please stop by any time during the following two public workshops and let us know how you think Key West Transit should grow. Public Workshop #1 III ounday, March 4, 01"11. (3 pmi ... 5 p i) City Commission Chambers Courtyard Key West City Hall 1300 White Street KeyWest FL 33040 @ p KWT Bus Routes: Orange, Blue, Green, and Lower Keys Shuttle Public Workshop #2 t"tiesday, March 5, 01"11. (2 PM1 ... 4 Pml) City Commission Chambers Courtyard Key West City Hall ICI 1300 White Street ui w Key West, FL 33040 KWT Bus Routes: Orange, Blue, Green and Lower Keys Shuttle *If needed, transportation will be provided for workshop attendees immediately following the workshop. Please III w u u u contact Key West Transit at(305)809-3910 for arrangements. ME CONNECTIONS Oliver 308 of 40L 3054 (1)How much awareness is there in the city (8)Do you think there is a need for additional about transit/public transportation? transit service in Key West? High e Yes Moderate No None at all Do not know (9)If you answered yes to question 8,the top THREE transit improvements you would most like to see? (2)What do you think of Key West Transit service? More frequent service on City routes It must be provided More weekend service on City routes It might be useful Later evening service on Route It does not matter to me More Routes like Duval Loop.Where? Not sure it is useful More frequent service on Lower Keys Shuttle We do not need it Express service.Where? More bus benches and shelters (3)What is your perception of transit's More Park-N-Ride facilities with bus access role in the city? Other,specify Serve tourists/visitors (10) How many months out of the year do you reside Serve workers/commuters in Key West/Lower Keys? Relieve parking/congestion Connect islands Less than 6 months 6 months to 1 year (4)Is traffic congestion a problem in Key West? Permanent resident(my zip code is ) eYes (11)What do you think is a reasonable one-way fare No to pay for transit service? (5)If you answered yes to question 4, Free what role do you see transit playing $0.50 to$1.00 in alleviating the situation? $1.01 to$2.00 $2.01 to$3.00 It will relieve congestion More than$3.00 It may provide some help It will help reduce parking demand (12) Your age is... It will have no effect It will make congestion worse Under 18 e 41 to 60 years 18 to 24 years Over 60 years (6)Have you used Key West Transit? 25 to 40 years R Yes (13) What is the range of your total household No income for 2018? (7)Have you used any of the following other services Less than$20,000 $60,000-$74,999 in Key West? $20,000-$29,999 $75,000-$100,000 $30,000-$59,999 q $100,000 or greater E Conch Tour Train e Old Town Trolley Key West Limo Other (please specify) Please continue survey on the other side of this page. 309 of 43055 (14) If you were going to consider using Key West Transit services,please rate how important each of the following aspects of transit service would be in your decision-making process. Very Somewhat Not No Important Important Neutral Important Opinion a. Days of service b. Frequency(how often buses run) c. Hours of service c w d. Convenience of routes(where buses go) Q Q Q R Je. Location of bus stops f. Dependability of buses(on time) 0 0 0 0 0 g. Travel time on bus 0 0 0 6n h. Cost of riding the bus E:1 E El i. Accessibility of bus passes(ease of purchase) D El j. Availability of bus route information E] E] El k. User-friendliness of bus information 0 0 0 0 0 >% I. Vehicle cleanliness and comfort 0 0 0 d IM m. Bus stop cleanliness and comfortEl On. Bus driver courtesy 0 0 0 E Lj o. Safety/security on bus 0 0 0 p. Safety/security at bus stops 0 0 0 Other Comments and Suggestions he �� THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION! S�t'i��� �iet '��� 1,�' ��� Please return your survey to your survey taker. n I�� 7,u , IndalW ,Oliver 310 of 43056 a"MR tl'.. r �, V, ';��ra KEY WEST TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Discussion Group Workshop March 5, 2019, 10 Ann •'• Welcome & Introductions ❖ Workshop Overview o Who we are and what we do o Why we are here o Overview of discussion •'• Review Material o Discussion Packet (Yours to keep) ■ Agenda ■ Key Connections Fact Sheet ■ Existing Key West Transit Map ■ Bus Schedule and Route Maps o Planning Packet (Return to us) ■ Existing Key West Transit Map ■ Workshop Survey ❖ Workshop Presentation & Discussion ❖ Wrap-up Tindale-Oliver, Inc. Key Connections March 2019 Discussion Group Workshop 311 of 40L3057 Fact � r� V I,i�u�ii�°��h�e 'iil s �Ul °°I ��9 °, I ,�� �d, � ,a��� Ilv 1\\1h 1111��4 Illl�luo^ 1��1 �l�`oN� ���V'IOIU N1uy "'ulUlVl!N°'IiOlulyN����SUY�9U➢I��W9V!'�V��ulluY vNUISv9�'Ii01l u9Yv"'�w��999W iv114��+IIIV� Key West Transportation (KWT) provides bus services in the City of Key West Key Connections:A Plan for Transit is being developed and along A1A to Marathon. Regular service for KWT to serve as a guide for the future of public includes six routes—five routes on the island transportation in Key West from 2020 to 2029. It will of Key West, and one shuttle route that represent the transit agency's vision to promote circulates inside the City to Marathon. transit growth and improvement over the next dec- ade. Services are also available for persons unable to access transit because of a V ��� �,�ii� \ ��[,',111 � III°,��(� l ii ,°'�1 disability or distance from a w° » route. Most routes operate 1�";;,;��141°llpll°°I` �����ICYIII��� �1�141°lll�,e 5:30 AM-8 PM on weekdays and weekends with 100- "r Public participation is an im- minute fre uenc . The free portant part of developing Key q Y �, Connections and numerous Duval Loop in the downtown ' district of Key West operates public outreach activities will on a 15-minute frequency. support the plan, including dis- The regular cash fare is $2.00, cussion groups, a bus on-board with discounts offered for survey, a City Commissioner IF students, seniors, individuals / 1' 1 t workshop, open house public with disabilities, and military. workshops, online surveys, social media interaction, gen- eral marketing and awareness For more "Info, visit y _ i w] '`fir insdt o ,r contact Key West Transit II IIIpIIII ,. u' mil/ ❑ . Tindale 1 mm ° q 1 /' ,., 312 of 40L3058 l � �JjjpIIIUo E��rrrrrr��gr r � �! JJJJJJJJJJJI' jff eliU1111���NkkNi //��//�""��,�Jjyy //��wwrr� kr M M EMONS _ � r c wo (S OkNI'�"Of91Dl IIUIIJIgf-� � ����/ �JUkNt OkNI'�"0191D1 IIIIWUJy�(Q�QI 111111111114'� 1 IIIIIIIIIIII ,�r��➢IDllp�llf�l-. IIIJIUy��. �JJa IIIIIIIIIUI ����/ �U&kN�'0191D1 IIIJIUy��. � �uyy� ����/ IIIIIIIIIIII os Help us priaritizeimprovements for the City's 10-YearTransit DevelopmentIPlan 1 Us/ f U U U r I U U U eu r 1 r IJc � Ul ew l eu r 1 r Dl � Ul Iw ff�fli dGw�fflli uun((frlouwlfff(flmwfGw ffluuwlm�flf�h f �io///��/oo�ioi/Oom/oi���//r �wvvmllll/immii/// ��i000d/�///iiio�Ji0000i Goiid �ioo///�//ooi�%/oo000/�//ol/oi rio��ioi�///000id/%/ioi0////%/ol/oi//oir/ri���// i' �io///��/oo�ioi l/oiiyio����/ �wvmvll�miai/� ��i0000dl�Goio�i00000i/iiomd II IIIIII 1 1 J r J J � N� 11 I rr rr u �rr rr ii' U�rr rr c. 0 rr rr c.1 1 a �� � lr � 1rlr I , II II II II (I r 11II �i 11111 III li li»� ll ll I 11 > > 11 1 1 1 r III 11 J11 �� ((f( � f�1111 f� llll I � �Yl (f l 11f 11 l �r 1 r w� 1�Illllllll �iiii ����ii IIII � � 11 Illl�al/ll� � �11>r1111��Illlliilla� , ��� i�>>�i>>l�loi�lllliiioiii�l 111�11.1�� 1 �J� �� / � I � h V IIl � Dl� �l��ll II �IIII I � IJ IIlllll�l , n 1I J� � 4 J Y.. M k r C5 R r P „m N IIIII IIIII. . � i M u !w wr r II�� IIII III � I�I Ili ill II � � loll� uuul � I � � IIII I IIIIII �I I�IIIIIII�I IIIIIII � p � _ �� 3059 Illlluiy r�� I�� uuumiu� Illllllllllo uuumiu� uuuumoJJry/mlul� r�� uullfu��I,pUuullluu»» ,pUuuuluu»» uuumiu� uuuumo �'� �, — ���llr, ��l Dui f f o Dui f f ouvn�//��� �llr, IUu"P��/�Ifrf IIII �����Ifrdf Dui f f ,� S , luu»» �lWY CONNECTIONS /�kNNN���l ��11���I������ I �JJJJIIrfl�f IIIIIIIIII f f IIIIIIIIIIIU "�I�� IIIIIIIIIU ����� ,'I�j 71��j� »�Jln IIIIIIIIIIIIICos A1 '�ll IIIIIIIIIIIIf�E'iINJ/JI IIIIIII IIIIIII, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WO I 111111111111111111 L jAy6denos a Ilpriorizar hs mejoras IIp ra d Ilan de I rrd 1 ransito de 10 aflosh cul ' '! J � J J1JJJ �� JJJ JJJ 1JJ1� �JJ� J �J��J�� JJJ JJJ ��J J��J � J J � J r r r J I � r t r t II I(III IIIII IIIII U IIII IIIII IIII IIIII IIII) III II JIIIJ JIII IIII I I IIII II� IIJ � I JJI 1 a J JJ a J J�� JJJJ JJ J�f fu JJJJJJJJJJJJJJ w� wJ(IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII III � 1 (I II I 1 1 �� 1 a I � II II Il 11� a1 I Y as as as 1 alp 1111 111 1 III , � I , J r � r � I 1 IY Il 11 1 � 11 I 1 1 11 11 11�1 1 11� IJIO 1 � 11 � J YI1 III I� a l» �ii 11 t� 1 11J 1 J>1111 ��� 1 11 l� 1 11 r r ,1 11 � 11 , III III 1 � l I �1 aa11� � t���� a�11111 � 1�1111 11r� � ll 1 I Ir I 1 �1 I JJ 1J 1 � O l JJ 1�1� 111 l�ll�l IIIII � IIIII JI � uu uu l E F 0 / 4 r f+ I/ /v •oiv�e, f ICI`1 II I •0 1 � �� I �ww •Dial l 1 �1 � Irl� 1� Il�I1111�� 1��11111 � II11�I l �11111 I111II111�JI IJ1J �J J1�J J� �Il I�>t>rrl>r>t1>r 11111111 �>>«< �� � ��l �1 1 � 1 1J , lllf � 1 �1 � �1 1 I I 1 f J J JJ J J : J , v ,a J � J 11 k I U F O r 6 W 0 2 �E F a Si uw uuum IIIII I� uu �I luu I Iluul IIIII�I � ■ IIIIIIIII IIII III III .. ... ... . M � � M IIII ■ Iillll II IIII ... II IIIIIIII II..I .. .. I I il.. I III II II II IIIIIIII .. III Imllllmlll IIIIIII III.IIIIU IIII Intl IIIII nl IIII luu�°� m u uu � • I� luu ��. �... ��.. au luu I I � � •IIIII IIIIIIIIIII r r r r r uvu �mm ICI Iliii�'I � � ■ ,III IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII III� ... I„... �I lluo i � Il�jllll III III III IIIIIII � I III � n Ilan lum °� lum luul� � r � IIII � � lum mw r. luu .� IIIIIIIIIII „III III IIIII .IIIIU IIIII 3060 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Key West Transit (KWT) is conducting a public input survey for the City of Key West 10-year Transit Development Plan (TDP), also known as Key Connections. Please answer the following questions to help us understand how we can Ey CO C 7 A0, better meet the City's transit needs in the next 10 years! �'��. I J . ;l 1. Please indicate your level Of agreement with the following potential improvements. Strongly; Strongly No Agree Neutral Disagree, Opinion New . or • • Network Add KWIC Connector(bus every 15-minutes) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add Airport Connector (bus every 20-minutes) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add North Connector(bus every 15-minutes) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Modify Lower Keys Shuttle (Bus every 45-to 60-minutes from 5 4 3 2 1 0 Marathon to Stock Island) FeederNew • (bus every 15 Keep Duval Loop as is 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add New Town Loop 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add Mid Town Loop 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add Old Town Loop 5 4 3 2 1 0 Add Stock Island Circulator 5 4 3 2 1 0 Capital/Technology • • Establish Key West Intermodal Center(KWIC) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Reevaluate Current Bus Stop Placements 5 4 3 2 1 0 Implement/Enhance Bus Locator App 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mobile Fare Payment (pay using a smartphone) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Improve User-Friendliness& Convenience of Using KWT 5 4 3 2 1 0 Establish Program to Allow Free Transit Rides 5 4 3 2 1 0 Expand Transit Marketing/Awareness Campaign 5 4 3 2 1 0 Purchase Smaller Bus Vehicles 5 4 3 2 1 0 Work with City to Modify and Enforce Parking Regulations 5 4 3 2 1 0 2.If you have ally comments please use the space below and back of this page. III�III IJII IIII 3061 y , 1 i Ic S S F/ :-),I wjIJ, ?r SCAN ,,j, HERE, nn inn room" 0 ■ �w wwwu ww SIN a TO TAKE THE SHORT SURV EY.11 The City of Key West and Key West Transit (KW) are planning for its future, and we want your input! Please fill out the short survey or email chaia@cityofkeywest-fl.gov Or call us at (305) 809-3910 to let us know how you think Key West Transit should grown u o ansit MEY C&OW101W . G r 3062 316 of 40L 170 vl IIII, �A NO RM I 0 , 04S ®` OR MMM SCAN ,.wiWUP,!I HERE nn inn ■ �w wwwu ww SIN TO TAKE THE SHORT SURV EY.11 The City of Key West and Key West Transit (KW) are planning for its future, and we want your input! Please fill out the short survey or email chaia@cityoflceywest-fl.gov Or call us at (305) 809-3910 to let us know how you think Key West Transit should growMEY C&OW101Wn u ansit . G r 3063 317 of 40L IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. IRMO / II IIIIIIIIIIII� MFV IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIL. IIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIV / WN IIII IIII Mo6lari IIIIIIqpart City of Key West TDP Draft Report D-1 318 of 40L3064 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� Iff IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / Y CMNFC71ONS I°)erfor,niance In its; Illi l g IP Ir,o IIr Ini Perforimance Meas�,,ires and indicators Once the proposed transit services are implemented,the following performance indicators and measures should be monitored by KWT on aqua rter[y basis for its fixed-route services as part of the recommended performance-monitoring program: • Passenger trips-Annual number of passenger boardings on the transit vehicles. • Revenue Hours-Number of annual hours of vehicle operation while in active service (available to pick up revenue passengers). • Revenue Miles- Number of annual miles of vehicle operation while in active service (available to pick up revenue passengers). • Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour- Ratio of passenger trips to revenue hours of operation. However, as fixed-route-type services typically take up to three years to become established and productive,the performance data up to that point should be reviewed and interpreted cautiously. Although adjustments/modifications are encouraged,outright discontinuations based on performance monitoring data alone are discouraged. Evah,,iation, Methodo[ogy, and Process This process is based on two measures,trips per mile and trips per hour,which are weighted equally to derive an overall route score.An individual route's score for a particular measure is based on a comparison of the measure as a percentage of the system average for that particular measure.These individual measure scores are added together and divided by two to get a final aggregate score.This final composite performance score is an indication of a route's performance for the two measures when compared to the system average for those measures.A higher score represents better overall performance when compared to other routes. The noted comparative performance evaluation can be beneficial, but caution should be exercised when using the final scores and rankings, because these figures are comparing routes to one another and may not reflect the specific goals established for a particular route (i.e.,geographic coverage vs. ridership performance).The process is particularly useful, however, in highlighting those routes that may have comparative performance-related issues.These routes can then be singled out for closer observation in future quarters or years to determine specific changes that may help mitigate any performance issues. Once a route score is determined, routes can be ranked to show the highest performing and lowest performing routes.The rankings are a useful proxy for determining the comparative performance of City of Key West TDP I Draft Report D-2 319 of 40L3065 IIII IIIIIIIIU. .,,.. low / II IIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIV / 1i Y CMNFC71ONS any route, as weii as high iighting changes in performance overtime.To track the performance variation overtime,three performance [eve is have been d eve ioped: • Level I-Good (>_75%) -Transit routes in this category are performing efficientiy compared with the average [eve[of aii the agency's routes. • Level II- Monitor(30-74%)- Routes in this category exhibit varying ieveis of performance probiems and require more detaiied anaiysis (e.g., ride checks,on-board surveys,increased marketing efforts,etc.)to aid in identifying specific changes that can be made to heip improve the route's performance. • Level III- Requires Attention (<_29%) - Routes in this category exhibit poor performance and [ow efficiency. Recommendations for these routes may inciude truncation of the route, reduction in the route's number of revenue hours,or discontinuation of the route. Figure D-1 iiiustrates the three evaivation ieveis and notes the recommended threshoids for each ievei. Figure D-1: Route Performance Evaluation Levels IIIIIIII�II�II�II '/o o / 4/011 W ut S fIl 0 �i 0z //yy City of Key West TDP Draft Report D-3 320 of 40L3066 0 a CID JJJllllllll, rr 0�prr N i i llllli ,� of uuuuuuuu�u immmmm u �I�01 uuuuu IIIIII.I�VVV 111��1 i ai , ffff �uiiuiuiuiuim mm I uE� "°���IIIIIIIIIIIII j D IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII W'I„III co co 0 Y M uuuuuuuuuuuumu m a v 0 U �-' "''' ii"' 0 O o CO U p T w a) °n o v v o v Lo ^ ° c J N j c .= o uuuuuu CO `3 'C a� 3 -O O (50 N > N ° �.IIY we a:i O U p N T L N N o_ p U d' N � - o uuuuum uuuuum) >, 7 N ° O U N O J _ uum uuuuuuull N O ul WCIII. ^ N O c0 U y a k.. � � p N � O O O _ J c O J Le a L � � L t ^" W Y W > O_ U m U O U L N c (0 - L O C7 p W CI S Q ."" H Ln U Y L.... uuuuuuuuuum I � 0 � uuuuum uuumuullllY a Q Q c °U a N - v � - T ti� ml uum H N S N i N L Y > - 3 O y E � o m o o v c O i ^ U � c (lido � 0 3 Y 3 0_ v ° -° c o T'� `o .� a s O ° H Q v w y u m T ° U uuumu m O O U1 N X Y >, O 7 7 " +' -O .� W O_ m N a� ^ O N L c _ ° J (0 U O VI 'O O > Y _ N N n O uuuuum uuuuuuull a U U N Y m O ° U O L p _O O c pph U .c N v v u o Q m ,��ii, _ c N uuuuumll Y a � t�LO T '� � ° C a >+Q •� Y '� � "m""' ° y o +� NT m a�i v� N O O > T N (0 7 7 0 L E N O N N .V p L ^ O ��. VI O N 4— mu a � W U a -j N m to Q Q p W m Q .o U U O O uulllolllllu O uml mnmm�nnnnnm U m ..5 N UN o c7 mumnnumunnnnllmnnu VI w a °i0 a Z o _ IDS) N y_ T N uuuuuu N _ 0 0 0 0 N Y c U c Y O 0- � O U T N bD j, a"�IIY p C O " C i o U ° IIIIIIIIIIIII uuuuuuu O U qry„y E Ti�l m0 """"" LL Z U N (0 N = U N E N _ U "" c U o a U o on N y m .. W ` a+ Y 'C N t 8dP c U1 y c uuuumuu N O O > > > ;^ C .o y N O N N Y N t0 m o co v m o L v L E p ^ U c 0 a T c � y > y U U U U U U coN U(0 N N E v N ^ U1 Y VI U � N °C °C °C 'O °C °C °C Z3 N >, U N w L N �,h VI ,U U c N y O � Y 7 1 O_ O_ ^ W 7 A a _ s v n m a >v >m ° ° t v v o 0 o v v o u N U N il p > pY p > pp p2 p � " dp Hp � Oa 0 � p � fV 116 A'A III � CIS (V CL CIS � u CISlull))) 'Z CIS I Ln 0 v ................. ° 0 v CIS CIS CL II v °' IL ® L u �m 111 � I > v to LL am O O O III III � � LnCIS W �� ���� III... O,. °� > A m C CIS CIS COL ICI � t 1 U n n cxr t IIII^' r, � 0 CIO r° M IIII III I x I A'A III III CIS � uuuuuum.uuuum � a>+ III���A'A����III III� ���A'A���� � � ILLJO wCIS 111 -.z. III rr) w uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu III,,, ���A'A���� A'A j... >... cr) uuuuuuuuullllluuuum U • w r. .z. Ln LnIII v Cis Cis m ((al! IIII II � CL " n h® � ' IIII III CL ul lu ul lieu,If 7, 0 on V "D („„„ 0 cfl 0 M ca L O � a) ca —00 0 c cn 4) U a) +� U —O m o a o cacn cn cn a) c O c — � .a) -0 c6 >' a) � L a) � O_ O i i d M a) O c = a) — — � � cn 0 cn �) 4) U = M cn O 4) O 4) > o > m (n • a _ ca .L O O c c >, m 0 o L � cn ca c c � m m o ca O 4) O) Y w -O 4 E ciia _ C) O O O U > �° m E `O c 3 o c°n ° co co �r 11 z 1 0 M My", uuu uuuum�m Ills li� M ' i uuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuu � � i uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu uuuuuuum �� �� i uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu °z: uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu cr) W U W GL : z: cL r) wQ, W J W ,....... ;... ,,... cr) W //Ill ,.� 0 ti 0 M N N > 4- 0 (U 0 _ a`oi c ui 3 o N °� N E ° °U v E(U E .o V w O_ N L O •N a� +' t N �� Q O E c6 OL +� (6 m a L t! +� ++ ;� O t0 N L a) o >' V -o V C .. aJ N N ro o m •E Q aU o o ro o 3 c a a � E L '^ o � E �' o t n0 on °o c o N t 3 o .2 $ o .E u o on c .E i U to ^ 0 O 0 � o o to on ro al Lm = o H L � o 3 o V c E (u L ro cp oL w p ~ 'G c N 'o �+ N N t 'c p (u �' a) O L U- "0 on a a tp ~ 7 L 6 E � o � c E � � 3 3 .o � E 2 � it On E o � J o 0 0° a > a (u L p N >. +� is (U c L c O �, a) ;, V N � E 0 c ca 3 _ to (U u •N N > o qj f6 o al E L N N L a "O c >+ o c o +� L a Q a 7 +� Q a) al f6 a) O c f6 f6 V L O o ^ ^ ^ - .c a3i ° c c ° a 0 0 a Y a 3 ro o m o > c ^ on E o b t a� o C > '^ o v a O N N O (u L > t ro on v c c t 0 o J o au L �o o li o �` 3 > �' a o o N o L i0 "0 L t L L OL c N V N O a..i V C 0 d 'S a > O 0 •L L V 0- 4L E 0 = 0 0. V cca V V u N a� 0 W = .o a, o f m ro E o L E (U L o L L aU 0 .0 2 u tl V a s to o o E u O m w to a _ m to a N co tt > N C N N .p '� (U W N 0 � 0 (6 a r y on c N 7 x w "o N N f6 �+ t9 +, E .0 N i N 7 on -O ' on f6 t6 C N C o u 3 .c 3 3 c •o N o � c �+ O T -M o N -2 Z; � a..i E N c V O C a) L c c +� t6 o N N N Y L a t6 t6 aU tt au ru c V C C on N 3 V N ca ca ^ +J -0 N E o (6 o c ro N c c on N 3 +� �' > - on o L on 0 .N to ro 3 to �' c c N c N to c to o .E ° E N H o u to 3 0 0 0 3 m �6 m o o c � N a 0 E c 0 �" � o V c _ (U L c t6 E ^ > L c +� +o o cn _ E -o o o 4- w tt 00 3 �' �0 0 X L N c c ` a t6 N V N V C a ui tt Q a L i c E o a ro a� ru � N c c N E >0 (U Y N ,� `O o 3 N N C N N p V w V •� o t6 t6 p O > � c O O c +� V t on c -0tt N L a E u V c o 3 V o N a� t c o � E5 E > E N °+�' -0 m a) +� y i N N V N t! "0 +� V L E .V O -p +� L "� L u 0 2 o � Q uu uuuuuuuuu � L Uuu i�i uw C y + tt p O a) � o •� N � N t a 3 (u +' N +� c o +' +J N 0 > 3 0 � - tt 0 0 3 .E � � E � ro .� +� t a� � � � c a� E a� (u N � � -o c O i o ` o c ° +' E E > a o N ro ro E Oo o L c o 3 t c 0 rn c tt m 3 ° a j p V ,L, w tt o U > E c w a� y N N t6 N N c o L on N E - a .= a) Y c tt tt V In E a..i J 0 3 N O +�+ N on `� O tt o �' u ro +� .� � c > (U -0 E E - on a� o 3 aU aU o (U a ro L o > a� ,c p o tt t (u a ro E o o N c (u c E to c -o o to - a� c o V •o tt t L o N '� C V > C c c 0 .�^ c (U 3 0 0 3 E ro ° cn aci ro .0 5 0 > to a o w -0 o a) +-' i o 'O L O •L t O > L E o N b 0 to O c�, t 0 N V c t„ a +� — — ,, O c 3 .� t6 a N i 3 ro ro o °c ro S .� c c c ro E c .o 3 o Y co o tt(U .}p c N 0 E 3 0 .o °c c c 4- tt •N 0 w 'a au 3 V O E >, 'c L L c cr) w 0 is O N W a 3 to a ° 3 '^ o V o `' o ro °� a�tt 0 °) >... >... cr) O `� N - _0 "O `� t6 N � M t6 c - +�•' t6 3 0 p c E tt w r. c N T O .� on .� 7 t6 t6 c N w � o N + j V C +>i Q � +�.i U N t6 � � � > �U O O o U V U 00 3 3 a� U ri > a3i V 'N U m h % t o O Ln (U c 0 E b t o a aci t w 'x Ireu, H e to N 5 2 L u V (V 3 V to ti 0 M u 4- a) o c c w o o aNi E ° v ° •o _ N N c6 ++ O L N •CL 7 c6 N O (�6 "0 >+ 7 O N N v c6 y .O '� i V '� N E V E N O a a O 0- O 3 E E 3 6 (Lnu on o au E N O �, � � aU (U N o E �, 3 o a N �, o u c (u o E a .i O t N a E > E o c �' .� t ° ,, o f 0 .5 4 ro V +� ' O " a on N on O 0 ° i6 N N V +, N on +> > O on a 'y c V O L N N N L V '� V V L N o O OL N "0 ° V N N c +, a 0 O L N a 3 (U E N cu o r o u Z E 0 u ° a, a� E °�' (U �' O O ca ca ° t6 O t •N o +' S N Y N on +, N ca i L O on fa .o O o aU N > 5 V .c o O c V c N O O N c t Z on V N a a ' o o (u u .� aci 3 .c v (u aui a c a s 0 c O N 0 0 �, E � t o ro o a (u E N w V +, • i U ° a f ro m on E u on N c E c O ;o �' on U .o ^ a 3 c o 3 co a c E 'E N N N N 4, V Vf N y E ° �' V Y N V N E -p 4, V N att ma 0 uV, O N C O V) N m •N w ro O +� �0 U .N ro ma N ma 0 ro m '^ O N am p ME, d N > O o (U r t 0 0 0 ;� t o t (U t (U c C t c t t L E a tLO u a �, u H �, co N u a H �, a H a c6 u H tt �, u a Q H o c (u . � co 0 c on (utt L .0 p c c o _ oo N onc tt Ea c > on co >> � w > 3 r- � 3 `- N o Y c c ro � a O N �, ° c n ° t c o w N (U 0 5 u �, E " " ro aU z 3 N +, t `S N O yj it N t on axi io " E E a ° aui o on (U '^ '> (u a a N c O F> 3 E L > c +�, .� C N O "O . a LLM 5 N N E U N +, "0 V N ° O O Ln f6 O N N tt O N +, N C on C N 1 L i+ M O 3 7 ate-+ U C ru c m - N $ E c 't E c 'm c :> 0 _ � c c c c o V u c E 3 3 L t0 E •� E E °" '� > y +�, c E o '� N -0 L m 0 N t � N E N 3 > a z o o N E a u +� v Y N '•'•' L cL6 t6 a > V L U 5 3 c o M a c v a o > ° 'n a c (U N a c '-" t U on N t O N t ° O N > N '� E Y In ma a� a Y U ro c o a U �' +, a U 0 (U y E c a U (u '> E N r ° t t a r t r t a o a�i °c r t ° °c H H w U Ln H �, �, w 0 �, U H (U U H axi E m uLL. H a m tn N C +, f6 Vf 3 > •- O -c N 'L OL '� O, O' w 7 r_ on N m �, t o ++ �+ E O t N ma V O a., "0 o0 .Q y N •r_ u E a - 0 'E a ZA 0 it V •c Q = '_., OV In t on tt tto (U N O °' aU 0 3 ^ uc = ° o o �' tt 3 =_ ro 3 a0i o mo o ° c > � H � H 0 � (U L r- �, a N o a t a ++ .p y ,, ! S N OLn N c N N ro ma on �' on a 0 d c Nu � L N ° C Y G N to '�'' CS C E (6 w 0 C O E (uY C a 0 on � 'y O ° U tn 0 > U > r) _ 0 d c6 O V1 OL E 5 a 0O � � L L .'�.^' •� H a a., -O 0 N LU c - (U 'tt O c t a t t ° ° ° y° o d o ro ro z: tt (' tt ° V o a U o w In (r) � V S �' E w w O L N ....� �' '� y N Q In In ��; C.) �....... t a +V, N +� "0 a G N CS O "0 .. . a N L t .�...'. V c N O G G •j N M >... ,,... cr) Vf N E EO + N ", V c N 3 OV •� Ott J J J III u aTi °c aEi ro O E �, E v� a ° O O O u on c rl( o art ° o Y °u a H o lull a� c� c� c� o h lreu, �������� Y tt H o o t H 4 C7 N ti O M on � 0 c (U N +�.� C O Dn DA (� V, O N > x •E 4., o N N CO N N N i 'O N (U N an H c ro N > 3 t In m Q E c a� �` o t N ,� on c cm O >+ N � ca a� u tz w a) > cn m a Q � N c c .� > 0 cu � � o N E uuuuuuuuu O O N V) N +� m p N c Q � u i C N 0 wr •N N t L V "O d �' o N C y •i NS O O y uuuuuuuu �illillillillillillilliillillizillilililI OOv O N O OE+� O o t6 "� VFN w N N Vc N C s C s_ - v1 - w t C� � ++ E C N O (6 +� N N N "� V V1 N II L N C I o muuu co L O N Y i6 0 >+ o 160 N 3 2 N mu "J -0 -0 Q 3 *� N O 2 t V (6 N >' H o Vf Dn .� "0 p M; N M M a'' t N - N V N _ Y 3 N t c6 w r p c O (n N (n L N tz V, c E ,E_ p M s_ 4- muuuuuu N N N .2 V N � 3 = O O 0 u O) O 3 E > N N -O N �' N N c V H O E N LD L co E -0 2 -a •C wl � o Y O o +�+ C N N C LM V +� uuuuuuuuu O = M V �p V `0 t m •3 U i V � O V L o .� N N N C N mu Q E cu = V O (6 mu � +, N N N (O uuuuuuuuu p w a� Q it 3 0 o 3 N +� c 7 Q -0 415 uuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuumu O �O III N O 4 O > ca > V (n _ _ a o o u Q a E O w N rr � Ill��uum��uuuunnm�l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � ��= t �h � � � uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuu h � I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuumu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum '»� .� uuuuuuuuu °,�� �r I„.a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII M� 4 i Mv IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .,-.M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 21 N I uuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuumu �,� '- r roil, , ����� oluvuul uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu mm �"uumuuu Ilium a , Ill�uuuu IIIII � Innm uuuuuuum uuuuuuuuullLU pl((uVl(uum((uul�m m� AID r1') „¢ p ti '� �✓^,w w D ( K f rm� „ r ...... z: e„ (m :, z' w w ( G > r n LU , .t, wrr M,9 Jy M ti O M 41 It r p'llF % I N r , r'( � �j/�/ `�/r ri !�� r?s/�rrl"fs�✓il r '�' Sri ,rr0 N fmr0 II�IIIII o N Il- � m 3 in o c o O ' c 'E V c6 Jou E, c u 0 O Y O O .N p V N V N Dn N N ( V -0 E C •N "0 O N "O N >+ N N •� O c6 Q +� w (6 (6 O N -0 V m i O V N fO V N w (O � ° E E E .E_ -oro -°c cu 3 0 ro ca O 3 m 7 V "E5 2 N c6 t C •X N .2 i a C +�+ , O V •� ru 6 Vf E i o r6 .L ca $_ N a .y r6 E `� N pn � a� O N c6 C c6 "0 i N w "O fO V N i i a f6 N C +� N a V S N N C N N t fO ru on N 3 c CL onc6 E o E N N V on r� 0 V N N 10 '_ O N -0 T N O N t6 > O - N V N C u C t 7 -0 N ate-+ (n N N a C f6 d -0 N O i C 0- V E N N _ _0 � c6 E N " y w V O V1 N N m N N ru N C -0 E y N d c N c c - N t -0 : t o °' '� o 0 3 c O E W a E VLu W CO Y t! O N Y t6 i EO .V -p H V Q 0 ° a V nj u : ri N 3 v ( c u .� cri N a 0 .E io c N ro > m 3 tt io i6 c H w m ;� > °' O Z N O 4- O O C t O t V 3 0 m Y 0 o 0 V ro � 0 c (U a� � V � N •Q� N c� C O Y N y d "0 O +' ...�.... C V O N II V N E N 0 Dn "". tt on �...�... O O O O O II'h... � •� � � V a N i � c6 �: ...� C N N a c6 C t N N O C ° N ; C a..i N > C C c6 >+ E O j V N c6 N 7 N DA .... E C o E (u _ ru ru 0 tN -�0 N' JEo3 m q N w a� •� N > N N ro ._ " j O 3V1 C N on •V w . CL _ � aU V > N� _ it c c ! , w °' "0 Aq ° 3 > 5 T aU a ca a '^ �, E t6 "0 >, C O N ,° *„ V N >, O N +' 'C C DA O W W ro E V 3 N V > > o 3 (u t o :;...m o �' o V a� m y c ro �,... � ��������M � E ++ N c t6 N on c N +' "C r6 N 0 o ... .� O N ++ .� w������������ O C N Y C O C 0 C O J ,., 0 _ c6 O N c6 +� c a N 'u V ca (U N c>i E V > � 5 n l 11"�I'� O .... H Y ca m .E m „„,, H > u ca H E ti 0 M O O c +� w "p C •� N V N C nn„�M N •V t O O C 'y O +� ,F "0 7 7 N +� c N >, c ?' N O -° ro ro > >, t I .... N a O 7 p N t ro to �' �...,,M 0 C V ro N T O au, V � t 0 c O on +� c6 °� 3 E +� N o to a ro V c on w ro o tt S i u on c c ro N > E -aN N 0 w °' VV N N N N a . N � cxL 0 "0 E N N O O U w N V) o a 2 N 0 7 N O 0 c c o O N to t T c6 .�? w t6 N N N ,.. y V N N 7 O V N > 2 -0 t N i (6 _ V w0 7 O a V O 0 N N f6 'V N p a N a � ° 3 N N t o 0 3 E 0 ro a c w 0 3 E rot o f ro V c T _ c N •� N N rn N .O Co N t 0 p �' 3 l.J 0 +�+ U c � N N c ro N O c w O �' N •0 �� c t>a > •E c N -0 V l w C on O U O +� N O .�� 7 on N N c O F N O E c N -0 cO 7 p c > c N C p N W O cn t6 O N w �.„. - a N N N t N NVola H 0 ~ p V w O N N U > N w.., an V in E M7 +' w a t Vi N N N a .N Y a tt , N a N O C +� N N ,., i N T N i U O > - 0 o N -c N L O 7 J "0 T t6 c O .�....�M ,,,� 3 a N E " �' Y a N N �_ V +� E c 0 N ro .N F �_ O ro T O V N O N T N t6 t6 V p N 0 +�+ •V N O N a ro N ca o - E c? c c N N O V +' 3 N N N �' V ... on 11 O O N N c6 V V N O "O "O N .2 O V O N Dn V c6 E •� J O a _ E c` H O L� t6 ~ C V O V t N N N O N V N "p N IX...,. O a m cn z E E a N E ro N 04 a � ° ° N c >, t u° > $ a CV cY) _ i V) t "0 N N C T N +' N O 0 0 N 0 V N V a..i .V ,+rT� t N O V) O Dn -0 a..i 0 O N .O .> � id a 0 _ _ _ C C N +� N i N a > "c N > j V p " O c6 N N to +� 0 E G .k Oyi o V on N .O t -a N a tt on a O a:, ,w N c _ -0 N — a O N a o � O t � � E O N '0 N w ° > o ru N E E •� •� � a ro N on 0 " Y i i a--� "0 N O 0 N = y � N .. 0 E 0 O 'y N O N N Dn E c O a 0 c ro m p c .. N c w W +� y M 'L N i N N ro m Oon o ro E a 00 a 7 o — O it E u c a -ND on N tt u � �"' c c N O- N U V 0 O CX � a V) tt N N i a _ N .. to ro 3 0 i N to ° � H , N C N UJI -0 C tO L VI tO O O L ���������M C L y y N C C to pn T Dn +� N O N +� �' T N tt N C to N L y c tt t6 "0 ° -0 C N 1 N o >+ +' T U -ND N N a M y w +�.+ •° U +�+ t�6 VO tt - .O N tt N �;;', N V; N O > N T V +� 0 0 N ro z •c an °� ;� ro N *' tca ° c E N a�p c .� N -0 c N a V E ro _ O 0 V ro N ro t ro c N N p O O O a y 0 N i N +� (� N N N 0 N �" 3 ";; N > 7 O +�tt N V N t6 C.l = N L a p +�+ too N V O .� N to N 0 T 6W h i t6 0 i > V N a L > N ° ro ro a N +�+ E 00 a E c N w,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, V O a s O N -c L .,� N v N u +� to +� > ,, on E a o O I— a, C7 a e E E � 62 -auQ W 4- c N T ° - 7 N `� N "c N V "0 a„ a..i V O Dn .0 > a 0 a + V c N N +� Vi c c +� to N c `E E 3 3 ro N o E c c ro a c c N ro o �...,,,M N N a on N E V N u a Dn N N (t a O >, c 2 N •O c 3 c "0 ,2 +� c C c c Y c 0 N " N N N 0 O c N E ro > �� p C > c to s O n O j > V C t6 .0 N a 7 _ +.i t i .— N to N C Vtt O on N W a N a ,c "0 N N N p to V) W on V U C N ° +� E •ro Q ro N N on c 'y N Vj c c ic N +� N U N > c t N t 5 i N N _ W t N �, 3 a > ro 3 N .N z; 0 N 0 a V O N V E 0 0 N N O Cf) N L IX„� (OC14 L V O T O 7 N N >, 0 N c C N O 3 ° O N N N O W m >, N on i N 0 >, ,~ V E N E N ° .�, u N .E Sri V to .E to a� N w N C ° N 0 on i N Q N N O N w u 0 a N O O C N N 0 N i N O 0 N N 7 U U _ N N V N N to N a N N t V V t O V to �..... N N Y V 2 T N to T an N 0 ,�, " 0 .� T N V +T N O O ua -.z.' w w V 3 tt +� O c T a V V t c E N E c +� •O T O �? N N o c c w z' U ro o E MU ° 3 �:... E o c c = W ° aci tt aTi a s w r,. +� 0 a c V' V c N E N io to c ) ° > N N on N O E N +� n ...m t c u.. a to -o — c E ° a V N .° y _ N E c O N E (ri �° a " a ° -0 E a� ° N E o f a a ° ° o aFi o E a o o o N ° ° ° Q E N N on i V 0 N N O ? to O •� w tl' w mah�meu� O T O N to c N c „„, to a E a w „„.. a ED on . is V ti 0 M uu r m o d l IQ M c" � N "" > .O N o 0 3 ( 3 ro o a; 0 0 E a N c C >O (U OU 4 0 a a� yp 4 (u �P J� -0 "h +Ln �� l"r'waw wi "0 O O- 7j 5 4tiy +� E on N 2 hh ` 7 Pl c >, 7 U O w� c c O O +� r ^ 4yki V w,�^a y (Uy c O IQ SIM (U 3 0 N on 0') 4 W^^`S w� a y (t V y C�7 ,"w w�q����w'h 4 �p NN, w 4^r�4� h: y O Q)c ? c c (6 O o ° ° c c c L +� E c N l4J N O a 5 N N � 4 �^ O N N = f6 s uZ Lon •T H rn di :. O 5 -0 c o;^ N N o i� w E -0 0 N :W2llW,k`, .p � � c E v� c CL N N N (U E •N a V V +' on N ro ru o H t 3 .c m w c (n (n o o U o 0 N w o oo .� .� (d z (a ro 0 a (u 0 (U V -Iic O 4•) m Nc Co o V/ (U N o a 4a EFE 0 'i Oc r .(? z UNN i(U6 V O OU ' > >, z: c N pn O O N O U v_ �� N O c L C > c V Q EO N vi o O O N w N `L L (6 O N .,w'8",r O N m ,1 .O O ar O w_ -Q N O w N N •� .�:...� •O O O 00 c O N ~ N N 0 > N .. �.. �.. — Q V _ O O Y N N N L o •O Z N U 00 00 Q o N U rO � N Dn n ^, N� Y 1 O O U 3 � N t LLI —� W `W W f6 N y m � 0 m = 0 ,� � r N LLJr, ..,z; c 3 E a�i c w o Imo— a m 3 '� ° m .� 3 0 n `:? on o J N c c N O rJ�irie' cfl ti 0 M �u r i �M '0 O �i0 Md ii O r Q >xt- it pip ,P. i' n ,a sv'sD � s j au . E a w > V C 3 N � c N U>l Nu t N N U C vi j N N E c N a ,, N a- V o w V c ° N t 3 U N 0 +� o .2O O ° Mo aot -0 - ac ) O V M >, U N o v = c a o o O f6 •° N c U i u +� DA O N a " O 7 c c V '� p a N N Y o > c CC N a a- t6 L a s 0 N E � a-n Nc>° _ tc tp +� �V 7 •� y C NN "0 c D00 ° N "0 c N c 6� R N O cn "t.0 Y t ro N 6 O Eyj N V ro x (' o � ° o ° i a c4- 0 o u a o cCL O u UcV ° N o V V> ro E a 0 > > i N V N° V "0 tt >+ N "O 0 U V > 16 (O N > N LL- f6 p' 6 Nr t on �vi } N ic a c a0 f6 c °In ott ° O° ca c O a0 -0 ° 0O c 6 > -0 V opwO ro N - o 6 � o Co o N a c6 O a a N V ° oO a NC M -aU 3 a0N o wX a ca Vf >+ N N ri aN u i. c on O N O O o w w C N LLj0 V a >' V o N > U L U � >,>LLJ � ° c an acroVc�i V c a ° iN c o N U>lon a u o W p o > (U aO a) v) ro 5 � -o O ro� CL l V c o o a oo N " = V �� „„.. H N V ti ti 0 M �^� y rq�ir�i6 q 1��1 rDr!rir`IP"'�J✓�lGq/r �✓�/I��L u7r �"d'P I III III� r pPr7alPld r7�6�P �ryy �r�rr✓r �%� ;r7r�Porrm rrryG�ll� r al 11�Jd,aP" 'lr iu� �:,✓��l�pY a e�Pi�o / i , - 1111111rr�r,,r� ua�/i�lD�inu �� ' �ao anu,���?tl!'4�.✓Ifj�rrJ" %� Jr��ry J�������Yffffil fl///�%��Y(tD1'l�lllll�ll ��� ,,,,u,,,,,,�f � Pi il����%ail%�/%%%%% III��4!✓i� y'�`ri,u�� ���� � f // Ill I �I+ a u Ia�lllll r O ���n��r�i���'Jir�l/�✓s�///��� IJYff�I Jrrrrn,artiiirrll�U/rdJ�%f`�,I, rrra rmiiirriiinlr�!i�al i l ��10�UJ �lJL r � r' r ' ,'�� ���)I�, ✓'�rUGO✓ '' aa~ /J °fir '��j�rl9'lJ %'� �/1 dl6� ��Ull��1��1���+9i'��N����l�e ✓nim�� ,i;d° �����1�%9p�1�1r�II f(Q ^ �lirll�r'���'�!�bi�lr/� �u,,°�trn�F , ��`� ���%1"'�l�rr���°'r� � � r✓i ��((��/�/� n✓�j� � /J�/ '�l �fly ��� .�P ��(��i f (°�i!7�7 ���1 (1r7�i aiury ��Oar✓�' �//Jl11rPa ��r� �d� i HJ J � 1'✓���DJ�'nll'� V �rcr, �11� u%��U�7r✓rr lun y�as rlj fir/ 1�1� �J � 7lf>inPPrP mPar o i ,r M r /lc,rr�OQ��R� � 7rr7i da9a W G;�r110�V� 7ylll�aid 1 „ ,�iaY unit r� ���� r�!1mNPi JJJr�'l�rfil a�'y,%6�u1'rrR �� 1n N "0 •p O c (o o o o w o ������ ICJi°trl a✓ p ,fir �19 i (6 O '0 a� �r✓0/m� ',,,l l D/ N d Vf O d Dn i � � � C +� L� a..i V N • i O O V ^� N � •^ L7 (6"0 _0 O on ! P ✓or U' N c t c d +�+ d (6 Vf d i C $ rf' r �i�l//Gib✓r�T'f°r�r! o w O o a� > O 2 > (a o a 0 N c a- ° ro on N 0 ' / all 'lfly,"10rr /i!lP N � > N c r,o m�yJ/ O/1 � N O- 0 C N D/GIB' e111/r r�� 7,e a '/ N on E u c ro io H aVi 3 �frfir lyi, ` a%l1In"%/111 JP JJ�1 'r11 J1 +� m I.Ut6 (uO O m u N o c '. n p 0 N o i �O •N •O araa,iir O W C -0 N L V m y 0o 0 w V O �' N C V N "O a_ -0 w �i tt O cr) w N i o C LLJLLjau Ett c8 M> cr) C N O O 7 E a t N 0 ( J on -0 t N C ^' /6U•r III um uuumu � E ,0 34 a 0 N •L (6 +� (6 00 I- C) M O V O N Q j 0 +� N (UN ° -p N �I�'�d c NO O N 7 p V w o % o p I, c c p � t a o L� OCL a� o E ,tp c Ln aU aU m O h� y c � ca �a C 3 — p to 0 ✓ ��� H E N u .c y V O i y -E -aDn ��r y N V w w N � � � > o m � � ° a a�°i ��,j v� °� j •o (u t o t 3 E �° t, �` ��" E Q ° 3 w N c p y l �i'r, N +� O ca y E y o @ °s w ° a w � > on t Q I r ' O N (U o C c c N Ntt tt N Ln 0 'p 3 (UQ o L i m N o (U E 4d • au ° N t6 °' �e N .� j '� L p C C on "0 NT -0 V N l c N > c N c N 4— � a� E aci c = ro o t $ •N O N (U p E tt c on N it N k2 au c U�. co 2 o tt :Eo Nn E E co au o a� t co V C (U � O Ln DA >+ iiy uuuuuq C � N '0 N t o a c N ON E o jl z° 0 c ° E c+'� is '� N y O Dn O -0 N = N C V .2 Oo _ E in N O 0 ° "0 Vf w { 0 '•6 d � •� N V tut (U E p ; ° N p �, ° u m o N O C V O V > i N ,., E y y 0 N p c N 0 D � N V V O +� E p ( '( y0 t > 3 c O $ w N > on N r (UV L C 0 V N i y •0 4:, ,a y > Y O V > N N +� n t t N 'y N o0 0 3 0 d > w �_ 6 c > V 0 > 0 O 3 LU i c c (u ,U N N N o o N 0 = p o C m N 3 N m �° o on o c ra E N O on •c O c Y c y •° p U V V > o u o onZ o 3 C (ud y LL- Ln p N N �, N -0 on u ° V -0 0 c -0 0 0 c 7 O o t O H t $ tt � 5 E .E ° tt it +�+ 7 V N E ° 0 E N w qj +� DO on O ' f6 �+ 0 N Vf .'t i w "0 f6 0 t ! i, /�a ,.... (U •� O m ° (U :E V 2r`. t N O an w w O- f6 C i i c N c E o46 > ra j 3 t on ro ro - �.0 %; E14 Y� MI! �� N m qw N to �l ��'��' +� 0 w // C V on o l _ (u0 1, ,.m ° -0 y V f6 In _0 ° 0 ° iw C 0 tt N 4 � w "0 0 p Yj/,w �, O t6 t d OV 0 N +� t6 N I/ c i i N LfI .� O 7 N t U ." y C (UO E CE a 0 c6 cr) w f6 y w 3 NO a 0 0 i 0 N N > O c E _ � 7 Dn IImmrr ° Ln N V Y a� E 0 i 7 .'p i ,0 N 0 [6 L6 0 c u ro ro E m° N lieu, 0 H > +�+ 0 +�+ V 0 ti a M � r `✓1 1/(i�✓lkw///sir '��/ li/i//y i/✓�r 1 r f ✓„ �f<� I jii : f/ ✓% H i/ %T��� /✓!%/ it r/Y�'i r� I O f/ /� "i / ✓ r n✓ / rp +1 /rah ' �/ ��/iFp�Yrlt�lYfl� 41 O �� ! � �Jll//H�! ���i fF�✓d�P ulrai N ++ I Ln Ik N (7 10, c7 (U tn G / r/ ✓ Y r r�/ ii��1f��///t%j. Vj L L N V) N V N +� 6 L N O u > - 3 N O O c ~ O N VI 3 O Vf t 7 0 O V) C N Dn (U on t0 on V) N t Y O on N DA O i N N C ,�_ C L 'y +� "O > to •N t V O �O V •V �' c N 12 V �O E O � 0n .N '�V N t6 ;:, >+ C C a O , w - p V E +� w o u E �a N c V_ c o � = E a� ru a� c6 O ro V)V O N f6ON DA i NN "ON a S 'OV V) ca N o � � c Eon n N � N ua it O V) Ot V 0 VEro O Vc O O N c �' > „ V; of w o yI' � V) tt OU N E N -(O o OV � +`.� L N > C E ON N o f6 ��������W�w -0 V N N N N C -O N -0 +� `n N Dn N E N j V) i "O p N y N p tt V) O V CO 0 C O p t0 a y N E N N O V V O O N >+ T V C t6 �������������� O V tt N +� +� N V +: N N t N > t (o a V) � t -p � "O � DA N C E N O au-+ N J N C +, V) C N E 0 C O N C N N V) p V) c to t - c 3 E N N N 3 .V a o 0 a vEi � t ro O N ^ E o V V v E o V "O N ~ N a t6 V V co N p N N NO C N -„. N DA on Vf "0 on N Vf 0 - w 00 "O C a C C- tt •O f6c on .� a� o aTi a� c c on n ro �' on V cn H ro �. Y c Y U o a o 6 -o ������� c a o z; 15 - to N N 0 aU on of d C ,, a3i 3 4 '^ `^ 0 E ., a p a� LU ����������nn������������ ate-+ N tN0 + 4 co C N tt O O O C .�+ N on C N S O C 3 O ++ w N V N E ++ .E -p 3 N V C N +>+ N N U N W ; (S p f0 -O Vf i N W tt C C C—� '..m O 0 N ( O tt •� +O+ N C o a V +� pOj� O O t +� "O N W ��� C O N N >+ i DA N U N Q C V O N a..i �„ 7 on o E N o a� E - L tt C N _ _ N V L O O N 0 "O to 0 _ C V > i � Y i o o Q H > V a ° ° a 3 3 ° .� - 3 V " tt 0 o cli M O (6 0) -2 O U _ s O �f?< a M 'O -0 a "- " O U U a U / =3 Q Q O O U X E cc U m O E 2 � 2 C s_ � r. U O O '� O O O � a O / ' � -0 (6 -0 L C _ 04 p 0 M 1 C U 2 O (6 O O '�b � 7 m ��j t C � L O C 7 0 Yi T o / a c vn O C u (n O IN / (6 a Q U C .0 — E (6 E = O _0 a O U uuuuuuumllllluumuum �� uuuuuuu uuuuuuumu � uuuuuuumu �;"uum noun / uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu U uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum ������� uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu r /��/�/ %�7 " � .�. s I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu uuuuuuuuu uuuuu uuuuumu I uuuum uuum uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��II w N O II � uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu � O N �_+ a-' � t 0 n � N O N w ~ .9 Nu=uuuuuuuuu ,� O U ^ N w N O >+ -III E tN6 +�•' O N N t E a s_ >` O E N t `O uuumuuuu p N c T ,, •� N U O o >, IIDvi - uuuuuuuuu bq N U i V N N N i6 V O = i N 4 N s_ O 0 O N O N uuuuu uuuuuumu U ° N O � N O C V p O p uuuum uum O H O w L� '(> `� V V N •� O 0 � +� N E +Z -p E N °z'. uuuuuuumi uuuuuuumm Q a) ( IN O O 0 .5 •O E N 4 Q N C D O H a Y V N � -0 cr) N O -C N Q N - V O (U O -0 0 U U >` yE N C `� O +, N N N , V W ° N N f6 a�i N -O 3 N Dn 0 (O L v) 4 O O � N Q V i i ,� �, E N a (U oLU a� a �' 2 c c 0 E 0 10 1 >... y... cr) = N 00 N ,'�, U •C +N•' N w0 O O E +� ..z: s Y c O N c ro Z Z N 0 O s_ n _ _ Jll _ a c c r6 r6 on U a III l� n _ t N (U (UN N � '',Jl f l f z N U a°i H 3 c�a 3 E E a a E cn ° - (U TMI co 0 M 0 ro ° ro \l w Q) o E y °' 4; -0 o o ° ~ O on _ o an N V 3 V to C f6 •- (A N 0 E z C N E 0 'j WCa p °c E • c on E o oV 't—t .a is m $ o �, 0 .2 uCL on V 0 O is c V au N 0 i s 7 M > N u +� O on on N N f6 N N E 0 ) E N E 0 a4- u N Vf > u t mo 0 E f6 w N N 7 C w 2 tt u +� tt O E � � � N N U O � � O •� i O L. L. Cl j //.. O a — N +' i N +' // NT N E a a o N E O N %. �/ t O O E O i L > ou co a E: tt a ttu E E tt a / j an cc i j� c7 I. C f� a N N 0 •O O o +1 ° 3 u 3 y co 0 .O 0 O 0 ma O $ 0 (u 0 E 0 0 0 MOE O C O N MO `1 E •y a Y 0 On E E a ma c0a ° a 0 N m o Q E 3 0 0 c c E c 0 w 2 m O 0 u u 0 0 tt t Ln o ro ° tea ^ m � > a��i (U 0 o 2 0 +� ., � on a o N E E N o O c •� 0 0 aLn _0 � ° (u E U -0 = a o -0 E " � '� c E 4; r IIVI ° 0 a`�i tt E °U a ° c > ro � N ,� 3 N a a on 0 0 u N o 0 w O r o N on a �' O ...� on +� O p N -Op w o a -0 �. o o E ra o ff I� a N c i 0 c6 > 0 '0 0 N O O j H cu tt -0 ca ° 0 i - L N c + 0 0 (UN N ,� �' (U ro 0 T w o ° E >+ a�i ro N t o O in � 3 N 2 3 a E E 3 J o E �' N aU (U 0 0 _ 0 E a ° a OD 0 ,>, 2 c c6 0 3 a H u > O -0 N t O -0 ro N O c •7 +� N E O > on " = ro +� N 0 E t 0 N V 7 u 0 0 0 •N O O O D 0 u 3 D E N 0 o u ro ,, > N a; a c pp V (u 4_ ro o o N 0 0 a N -0 ro 3 o -0 0 O a O S > 0 E ;, 0 0 3 c 3 N Q u t ro a "0 N O i L u........ +� on N O "0 +� N u E on O y tt � .� E on o 0 a 0 N 0 W (U Ln on L N N S c N c 0 N it o 0 ~ -0 0 0 ° on o 0 a N tt — L.„„..... a� .c on 0 3 o t i•.n -.z.: ti Wl T 3 •p o°n N 0 0 N 0 u,. 0 0 O a 0 O .. Ln N ^ N O Q (� _ N w LU t6 "0 N "0 N h"o O O LLJN w O N c > N N o &;�..�� Q N' 0 N N +� N on H �6 0 0 C i N C p "q 0 0 N O N N 111 �(r a 3 N E c > T 3 0 fJ� °� a>i u i°n ° H 3 •E a a 3 a o t c N O O M 1 Aii � 111 r t i rrrai�r I i fr �I 40 i T on N c N t E c ° •� N f6 c6 -0 a..r 7 y -a N i i 3 y •E u - R a� N au 2 onia ro o j N N 0 E E -a (u c^p i o ro a -0 .� H o 0 c °o U o °� `� o o ro o a c E a� N c °c °° c o w� y V c a ° �` E .o O E M a� o �_ a c N f6 -0 V DO •0 N •N V 7 ; o N N c y 0 O -0 V c 'a 3 on c c E �' O V mu a c cTi aNi O c ° c cTi a�i '� N c o c- a o o w N 0o u .o o °� aai a 5 . .2 vu c ( 6 ~ 3 " � 0 N u o N t 4= c6 N O O c V O q i N i p c > t0 O '� 00 VI O .V N 0 > N C I t O � c o > a aU a w a� �.... u o `� ° N E a� N N N N a t6 O o au o � a tt �' o 3 c6 N C a N O N .0 �' a V O N tt 1 N "0 -p Dn N O O c ° �' O �' t '� - o - � .. c V 7 N w m > -p �0 O- m + O 7 0 7 N ° on N i C >+ C i ^ ° N N N c 3 N c O c o o N i ca '^ on o Ta �' ° °- o ca co o ca ca O > Q) on on ro w� 3 a3i o aci ° c N (u E � N c c N c C N 0 ro w -0 on c N o c6 o N o CL > on oa T o E E �. ° N a� t 0 u p > N V > V ° 0 N a 0 N c N V) M O "0 O N ^ c +' ! N 0 V -t N c6 0 ~ f6 IX Z c >. a� o ro = N 3 ( a ° N v E N N N N >_ c6 Q N +� O O >+ E �' N 7 +� DA E DO N V c aU N u E V w a (U O on `� o c`a c O ;, 3 -o c O �' c � ° tt O ,,, 0 N aV •0 N 3 c6 a on V fa on o o a •• U ro .� c +� c n c o 22 • N o E .E E N N on E N j,i N 0 Dn N a..r ° f6 i N p N N i i w � c C Dn N N .� N C a a f6 O N N w >+ "p 9 tt on E c ;° c 3 N °_ N o u 'E o +� U Y ca N c6 ,, N a ca i 0 N N t V N _ x 3 N O ° ° c o t o n O E � > ro ; a j c a c O 0 c N +� �' c �, o ca > E on on .�? N O +� '> �' w au V � E t E N ro E ( N l7 N 3 > a a� E .� c c �, > N t N Ln N O - 0 c c 0 N z: _ w on aU u c w .N V cons o � 3 +� c �' c�ca E �^ o u � E - •N 0 c c o .E ; o a n au 3 t o ro c ... r'} cr) N N E N O j,i N N on t ro ro ro N O �0 "0 N "0 ro ..... O on E 0 a +T+ O .° Dn it it '0 ° a"r O -p N N N 0 E fr a c w u J 3 u u v m 3 O o 3 c 3 c 3 3 � a� (U a ro o u t N c N (O . . . . . . J 2 h Irea, 0, � H N on 3 a a M co O M +� a) a) o, -2 t „ V) (U � c V 7 on > E ' > c > - Q 1 C o o O M E o E N N0 y O V O N U o d 0 3 �' � .� O O o O °n ( ro o �' °' ° a t Q aU o - � -o c N E c c a L N 'p o tt N 0 > c +� on u N N N N _ �� N re o 'C O on a d O 0- N -a a *�'' �� tt QA re III o o au o N s , w 0 ( •y c on E o ' ° aU � _ -0, z W�,. , E a 2 -a .� 'lilt ��W O uu "T o o IX M "T In it y Dn N 0 it /•, El m C N T Q .^ E � >, tt tt tt it N CD M N D E ro cre O N M N N a..i U N 0 a E Q p" +� "p 3 O V O "' c 7 O C �' c6 -0 3 N � N f6 2 �i = 41 +� N -Q C V +� r f6 N w V '� Q (•� N = �"""' O VO , °" o 0 VO o (u o t�Ln N 3 a ) w) m t ro +� N v on t a Q tt E n N O w 0 -p +' E N E in o y w N a " N -p — mE N a N ro O N c0 0 �' C N pip N N on N N 0 3 Q = w c tt X a N O � � N c N '> O o 5 ro O vi > 3 t c .E - N > N N O N N V mu Fuu c � E ro ° O ro on on -0 � c o on 0 5 -0 a N N c +> >_ o N N >+ u H V -0 ro ro -Q 3 on u w 3 3 u ro o u° cn E 3 H cco 3 c cn a myµ c Q O t O ru ru N QA I y� I /p ;j////✓ /i/�/;' r / / / (( ' G�i N�� LLJ LLJ rra LU W LLj a > cn � ., M •, I L� �,;�r,,A� ��r"y��ill� a �,0�.1� Iq 0 0 M co N IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II VIVUVW�IV���VV�WIUUIUUIUI�WIUUIUI� +� � s= p IUIIIIII�J111��1��0 p�� v N F- 0 3 ro N E m IIIIIIIu� O f'7 O a II m �' v II c 1 c v c N 0 N N L on N on 0 0 v N �11111111111111111111J11111111D0 0 u0 v v 0 (u �+ U 'O on T w � O rn O II � N O II L DD N N M u (6 U � N N y L t _ ) Y N a �O t6 % m 7 N p U C N w i'O II � O I. � 3 un w o lliiiuullllllll N N � 7 �, N 011 +..i W t` IIIIIII � U DD O , i 2 IIIIII IIIIIIII .� N v N f0 J IIIIII '^ U N 3 3 II� ' O N N U N N O t E o o co a z u u .__ 0 00 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � N III V O 3 II ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII V a,N VIIIrr////V//I//V////II���//�VI�V�IVIV IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII a 1.2 O IIl1J"J� IIIVuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui 0 H 0 o piullllll E � N 3 t N Vn (u++ to N au w °' ° VI 3 N E °> 11///!/%///O 3 u° 00 (IIII uulluuuuuulllll o ��� Il �I n IZ 'F M a N Lfvl 'i /G Dn O O N N on � ICI III,J1JJ11!�1,''"', u �� 3 o ro V w 0 N Ipi�.............. 3 � � Ire" Vulll�� u ,- -o •� N N m O V N +�+ f'6 Ln Ln Q V m O vi m IIill +�+ o _ � P"llo„�„.. I 2 IIT N N f0 LTT3 N II N a+ N 'C 4j om O w O O t(6 0 ul���� M IIIIIIII 7 y O T O � iu x v, 3 3 Y m H N U � U m in H lllllll� �O,LLJ ' rr) W �_ IIIIII ulm IIII W i� pull ,...... z: a III u ,.�,. r LLj W (. a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII o 0 �VII M III 0 ill licnil ry ui CD Ti C) 4— f .7 C7 co jjjj � y v = c IPIri i uuuum �'� al C5 iiNiNiNi tit r� �. � u III I } L ll � j i � �������lll�l�lllllll�l�l�llllllliii�� LL ¢ r �w 2� a = CL C (u � � _ 0 �' au c (u 4 o E 0 0 ro 0 u c on arq Eo on 3 N O O N1 N N ���1/lllllllllllllll1011l//////p II III �� E > N +" o E r i ro ro o c_ O o o a; E v ti ww ,S N N •� O N p �� O O /00000, ri] O N *� V Zz V 7 w (r) W GL O i N CL Dn O Dn N '"+.,.y w w 0 C .2 7 Dn -r +� � m E III "O O Oi f6 c6 -p N y.� O N -� . ; Z 1 C �r) c6 -- E Z Dn N E f6 Vf � 1 � . E itfN6 (U 5 Y ra/=� ° E .3 u o E > ° ro (u Ero Irea� I uo 3 -o it a ° 3 0C14 m 3 Nit H u- to o 0 M f6 t N /r f rur + (IIl1 /f'`lllll / N /yrtr fr V P'IIIr I�r ///�1///Ilia»l N an N N m O V t � 7 /��r�fPrVll /fl ppJJ++JJ 1 C_ i6 N Vf f6 N V r > 7 VI > l//(/Gr�1�If rr rpaia�rrarr ca N O u 0 � E O v�a� c o N O � • (ru C 7 C Z O DA V N (u O O ro Z Y -o n� ay a on c c m aU ri°i�a oi�r QI m"q .� c ca H (U o > onc ro � o �c Q 3 � N C ( ( Q E v1 E)onE a O tt m O O o V a O V r 0 iU C +' O > t6 (u O t / - N O O C 1 N E V > O 0- O O N O O co Or��GOIIUI'Url nl,/i IIIrU 0 j f 1 „„"' O O N N 7 t O H N Cco � +� m .0 N (U w +r +r [6 ^a4l C ++ C N .> > _0 m N 7 N > N VVf N C (U t au E V c au ,V Zo EE o o " O VU 3moo V) (u o °u wo > rt 0 m !! >, V c v) V 11�1I1/lull i!lfl/ `y °r Ur r" E J 3 N � Y E (U a .c f rt (U -o -o (U u E t O C C L Dn ✓�� 1p `��� ����� o%rr to O ^al a..i / o E d'l a/Jiff�°rr tlf�tdrm rJOv�ri�i�ri/n� w i C �N N O(U = X NZ Inon (U > [6 � C N / ag -O (6-0 unon O C C C i (Nu "O N C C aD..i "L0i` +O >VE3 (U C O wO E 05 E N OVZ O (n w O O O 0OpC m 0_ V V 0 O O NO cn a E a VN -00_ i N O Nw N O 'O C C > V C f,l,o�r/�I,�r/rU/�)qu r�rJm/UI»E D�n�I(rmJU�`��r��I�Ir�r J�r^lm`F%�U rJ J✓�r(r,ri�vg��1ld0JrrrUl'UU�l v19(�r��$��d°)'i^"U r/d�G ryJ��i fi�ivrG�U r' li. 9 J ......... "0 C O rpr U'w7 Uv o- r/I v fo E o > U .O > V O 7 w t N co "0 C O a..i �fDrJf1�� ° w rb"UJ (/rat (U L 0 > f6 (u .0 O y w +� Dn (6 V N rW IVIU UIDiU °r �f,J�6J r „r(0 1� e t E +' C E Il a0ir rf rwvgriNOl, JI�����- O p Q r O r l N N w 0 O i DJI "� i f prUr9l I t +-' O N „y/r q E > u O E N N N W > 00 �%/%III` a"rr � � 'l;ivd, A�GrUr�rw krrr °'JL c on N �/ rr E o E O E c aU -o c L: E V f6 N o 0 N O '0 i �6 V �� rf °Ur Urur/^ V ( r o V (U o i d 1 or LU N N +O.i O [6 w [6 C m m w n 3 3 >, c6 7 V 0 •� C o co 1 N O C O + N O O ff D/ mu+lrrr� L� > a..i i C C +�+ 6 ll � v� orrf ti rU tt m 47 O O O O o O aI V 0 0 3 O o E rra w +�.� U (U O vI t6 w V t�6 u +�+ (u 7 E N "0 y 0 C �C w C� rn C O H N D D Q C U/ul/ w"r°lfarn`j f°iGj41Ujll !/ „ E n 's N i w 7 O O d (6 i ' w M Dn C V c6 i Or MIf�rr O 1 O O 7 H IJJIrI N C r -o V c O E a>i t EL 0 DIIIB r�aQrAJ/��� +llrr�(G h Irea,' � 3 •E � rt -0 ro -0 o 3 0o 0C ��� ti co 0 M o > U) O E m oS . — — to o ° o In o .E O) U C m m O) m U m Q m � m to m c6 E to w E '� L O = E L C 1 m O a 0 L p O O to 0 m O o d U O O U a) (� O m a) "- m N m o E O o .� E m �' E L > m E '� E > a) cn a, O -0 o C7 0 ui a, o o U) m .� ° U > W C Q Q O U C L O)aL) O O o O ° a)O : m a) — U Q O — O "O Co 'tn L aJ > -0 Q > '4-J to C7 m 'm c"n o comma o m ami >, °' �_ o c� O E E L m O > U m U) a) U �H L a) L a -0 01 O ° ° +J m Po cq 40 ° Q 0 U 0 �° o o � m N � ° o > co +-+ a� co m c � N — o > a) a) a) m E `�' to CD Q o > �_ C� m °� o to m00 a) 0 0 0 Z N M m O m L E _ m o O - Q E < E L E c to E m o- N a m E m to C3 y) E O m O a) U L a) i o U m a a O E of C3 Q ° > c L a� m E � U > m N � > N fo of ' f6 (U (U a) � L N a) y N E 0 0 0 3 -a In E 6 3 � ,E `� T E -a E a� !u t>a 3 > 3 o c H N N E V E �, Y C, tt Y 0 a) p o c O O �' c E N t (U ro ro t 3 o o (U t o a i 0 to N 0 U +� o O 0 N E > O on O w r- a 3 on v 3 0 c O �" a V V -tt y O y ro C o c u (U 3 E so a) to a) Vf W t6 O a) t6 c � N tn6 0 j p N X N X to c (U 0 O V t Y (U o '� E 3 ° E N -o �' �' 4; " ~ (U on o w 3 � L p N " `� t ( H o tt c a� a3i > a� E N o V � Y � O J r- -0 - � ro = . > o � ( "0 E y E � ? ro N "O V III........... N 0 O c R O N c V1 Y o .i _ -, 2 ++ L so t L 3 o V on E ° o (U L `^ E p N a o a� u a N an (uo L so fO L -p V t6 to C — � L 3 w N N N C so `1 C L U!I ro vi L E -p �, (Ua ,V +� y N c 3 7 N L p 0 j E O 0 > +L+ O -p o tt 0 V N N N 3 L N O i r� L i N 0 N 0 0 E o o o a� S N a O W p c C' ( p a� E a, o L _ ram , t � a� t V E one a Q E �, L t E p w ro N Y '^ V a' ro ° t o L � a -- C t6 ? ,C O O -p N y N a) VO ,C 0 N t6 "0 u w N +� a L a .N N +� N ru c6 ^ a) L 7 ru _ ;... �... rr) to on C H on a) > to 0 N a) to p O W C,.7 .�. C L w.„„m N E c d o 'o (U Y }; ro c u 0 Y ro E I m it E ro ?J�� c c ro tCL o N o 3 Q H - t o o 0 M r IDIILIOIOd LI13!H p> (D 1 U (D + RSV (L3 U (D + N p m y o 00 CD c ur cw s �5 O VS uo `— ar a a � — >, o � G � � O q O t3 04 O o } C 2Q „ iaa 0 0 t Q0 Ir0Iw1C7d ruC7I E ° n O c m ° 6 l5 0 r- O N O »r0� O V 0 O LO .s.. 0 C ti✓ 00 1 0 lop LE b s pi O � t ro c i ° 3 w N N lJ Q E � g N ° N > y C N N ° N C 2 E Ia O a C O o V -o •° (u ca o E ° N a >, a� E V °- +� 00 a� (u a ro °c V ° Q)i a� o O a� E ° c > +� t C a C O N tt NN wO-Sp V N tV E O N .N ro 6 cO NO N p O OO O E o -oQ -5 E o O } ro aaNf6� ... 00 I..�.J.. III�.......... C w fO a..i w CO '� o + V a E N ° N O N C : w 7 'o N C +.� CO p "O C �' N a O N -p +�.� E "0 a W �' "0 +, a.:i Dn O + >O O C O ,V �' a > •� "0 +, y Dn V "(U f6 N au a� ' C �, to N t V N C '� C N +� O O - � � L+.! CO "� O "� NO •C 0 7 roN E ~ on E ro > > ri a �' E ro ° c tt -.z: N C O Q N N O o O cCa 0 t C 2 O O cna W H a� a� a� a > a� > t w �� �������: N U (6 t N 3 +� N = Dn +� •c6 +�+ �' w -0 " N LLJ,,. c, z' o ~ u 4° (u (u � ° o o -° (A 3 N o ro c°� o a .. (u °' c 3 0 3 n/ ° o 0 3 on -° ro N c6 „gll�lj�lrr +� N +� N a V 6 w +� +� +� i O V Q i C 7 a N p S C n c6 +' i C N N O O N O t 7 3 N (�6 Y � t N O i 7 w h Ireu,� N tt a ! a $ Ln 0 co a t a a tt w 3 E P 5 a 0 0 0 0 M N � u O a c6 on O w > t O +� (6 (6 +� +' O N " O .> .x , N OE V �' ..... a0i E (U U a� E r ' Lu a E o to N O t E a E 3 E V ��� O O U 2 w E on 3 O O T U 0 3 _ aU III ro O COL 2 w > c ° c6 N NN 6 46 Ot '0 E � N EN O NTm NNO it CQ tt N = NT C7 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu U mu j, Q U U O) o U C o O (6 (n O) � O (6 O N N Uo C O U O C Y O O U O }' -0 O 0 C O Q (6 � (6 � U O (6 m u (n 0 0 O O C� O O �_ O mllhmhm L O > � S E L - �--� O N -Q O U d� O '> >1 M U C •� i N C i m O .L am o � 3 5 a) N C i O O O (6 >+ O m 'O 0 p _ O O O muuuuuuuu O U O O c0/> > U O Y O M N m 'Hoocm E M O � � O U L (`' 0 O o N c QjU UO Y � 0 �+ p dj - (6 M O N ° O 0- (n L O U � U A U -o C N E U O -0 N m 2 C 0 > O Y 'O (6 O V U u O2 v (imm mimmC' � a) (6 O � L > ) "� U N U Y N N c a� O a� O mu j, U � U O mu (ten Q > U U O E O O O — U C U N •(n 0 0 N 0 (n cn >, U N = O o mu (6 O U 0 = Q O (6 N O � N U O N +� N uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum uuuuuuum6luuuuuuuum � 1,,�),dgI,VN 42 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum uuuuuuuuu � �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I uuuuuum r y �^ sH r IV ) m� Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllmlm J '/, � ,� IIIIIIIIIIIIII � P '�j /� z; I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LLJ GWL �lrnrruW myw J �W W y�"NIAV>rYN „^ l 4 ja > > r ° LU C,7 G mn U i, lrrr C '7 0 0 0 M lv N O (UV V -0 c V V N •0 V 0 0 V �� 0E `U N Q o a� u 0- N � a� t Cu Z w Cu E 'r a c a&i E �' c E ... c (U ° c 0 0 3 a N t aLu 1 "O 1 "O V 7 � '� N (U -0 Cu O .1 N N N •C ",. ........ Don � On �+ 0 f6 16 N � � .`��^^ � .� � 1 "0 t6 N E ca N V LL- N O tc,a 0 N 3 a c tt N N tE6 in N to N > on •0 N c c ,, O 3 0 _ ca a w (U o ca H a o a Cu H N N U C � 4.... C N N L (a N i .N- N i (6 O .�p`'�M V N a..i u+ E a..i i y a..i O C Cu y Cu t O 0 N 0 V 'te i H H a a w O — a w ° E co co 0 > �' 2 O un c c �wg� w) m N V L +� �: V N "O w „„uiouimixoxouoi p@C:,mlv � CI � N c Cu c -0 -0 t t IUSia�olN�olaSOV ups ��MM !!u�'r„ny a O N •0 N �1� N��� U o N N (6 •V p�onwm 6 m io�iuiuiuiuiuiuu fru fv aj �q� Unf " 'S +N 0 ° on " V ° ( �i 0O� N L ro f6 as �O >' N c pay a i/r ilia ,iCu UU��! 1 -! -� y�.r 0 V) a) a°i o o V o > ������1����1�1� �\��� 000V� Ja d��N N O c N d � z Cu i> gym:"" aiiaaaa s�a, N "0 Dn +r E V V pip,N 0" �s a�a)1 C N ~ 0 0 ° o o .S > a w 0 �, r N rt mr,r� ., a °' °' > �r�' w: H n� O i CL c on c 0 on on c N t N O a ' plem ���.r, v, N O C +r C C +r N lv c V t i J N 1 f V N •C C m m pn 7 u N i to +� O N 3E 0- Cu t C 0 +0+ +0+ 0 "0 0 E N ��w` oil i,: SIMON tr v OI. � �n ,a v ICU N aN ra N 3 N w a c .� ca Z +� 3 .O N 0 N O N o on N O N N 7 ra O fa N _C On to > c N N E c 3 on E o a o o `� ° �_ ro o_ O o c (U ro a a E in o +- °' (U ro o N Cu Cu `n 0 N .. "0 Lf I y on -0 a N +- +> a) Cu o °c E �' t Cu V) ro 'a c ro t o i ono �....M 0 on O N r- E ca — 0 Nan N -a 0 i N C O x'. a N O to o c 0 a V O N Q 0 O Y N n Q O W O N N ., C 0 m N � N 7 Cu Cu N N Cu O V E 3 0 .a L 3 ro c o C 3 Cuo - r 0 o t W a_ N '^ ++ X N '0 N 0 O 0 0 O CL N 3 N .r. CL N — O r) ca N W N N - - v N N N E N N C W Y O O �' .�,. C S N i N cu o ff N O 3 c Q O N � 0 N 3 O o c ° ca n w o o c a� __ t O 3 E > N o N 3 0 w.... °� on x 3 a� E p 0 It rr/// a� o a� � > � lf�j�j�j��l� C > N V �"i N T a H a Viea Y E +�, N 3 c 3 tea H C7 is Y .E ro E V > °c H 2 cca cn Y N ca un N ca �' 0 0 M on c CD E o a 3 a� N V J O V o N LO -a V N O tt N C O E Y tt V NEE,,,, V O o ++ on I L : �""w.. on c L C 7 +� (1 q i" O a � O +� O U c a 0 Q O CLO U N N o N N a N o a 0 N O a N ° 3 E o i Y O N N +� p) -0 -0 O U i O t 0 C UO N 00 00 N 3 7 m Dn 7 � (U U 45 70 O O O (0 O CL E (0 N N O N �' -0 O U L a) i N N 7 7 N N N �, w w N H m O CO m m .S m Q .S Q� Q� J O N ro . H d N C N C N 2:' N O Cl O V N N io an (6 N tt c ro V >, a s E V (U L o- V w O (U c t (U a N 0 (U N t N ro N on O N a N - '> c y on +� o o (U N a (a i ro n a N ° v�i p ro O c o WE N (a _ (a E c c 3 a t (U tt l/1 .1 >+ `� +� .�....,M N (U (U a �` V C (U y ° 3 (U '0 z: 0 N L L t o � 3 a„' � O N il t " ott W ° N i) (0 p" O V '" _a (6 (6 +=+ �' N c on +' +� L (uon (a a art ro o c N 3 0 ro W L _LLJ tt o on (a 3 L c E c E > a (a .E i > 5 c 0 W O T V .' O O (U +� L (U on w C 6 N O N .M Oon a pn > ,�, �....M o 3 N N tt le o a E N c w aEi c °'tt ° c L 'L N N N c N m o a (U .� a o 0 0 U �.... L c (a 04 O O 4j C E D 0 to 0 0 0 0 RcIr E C 0 co 0 m 0 F 0 (U LLJ C) c IIII -0 LU Oo 0)D 0 0 cu 4j cu U) E ; cu U) (3) > zz (3) 0 4- ru 0 cu LLJ u S, 0 Z5 (3) 0U U) 0 c U) 0 I c a) > -0 .0 yam., -d 'j- 04 CD 0 > U) NT (U a) M 0 4- = 0- 0 a) U) (D CY) U) M U) r�4 -0 4- 0 -0 -v) 0 0 0 -a M U)- a) (U = 40- -0 E 0 c 0 (U 4 (U 0 0 (U (u V) 0 (u (u t i� r4 a) " OL U) (U u 0 0 (U (U ru ru 3: ac -a = -0 w -0 v; :E u Q) 4- 0 E () 0 0 0 0 -LU 0 " 0 " r >1 0- " 0 o (u E E (u a E u 0 (U 0 4- 4-0 E ru () 0 .......... Z: on In U *5, -0 r- 4-- — r - 0 tt -0 U (U (U < u In (U > (-u -a (u (U 3: (U > 0 -5 tt U (U (u (U - -a -�5 V� (-u U)3: = = 0 (u 0 ,,, 0 3: Ou (u -0 0 -0 -0 0 Z 0 on > E In cu 0 (U 0 > r = 1 -0 - V� u 0 :2 E 0 0 (U u 0 Z: c 4- tt -0 E In 0 0 In tt CL (U 0 2 0 0 u " (u 0 u 0 (1) 0 0 0 (a > = = 2 (u z 0 u U 0 a- U Ln in a- 0 oo 0 u U) LU c -0 Q) 0(u Q) 0 c = tt -6� - 0 (U c u c 0 -0 = on Q) CL p u (u C a) Q) > u z u ..................... O on C 0 on c In :2 c C M tt tt In Ln (U -0 3: 0 " 0 M 0 In (U tt — V; 'i c = V) 0- .......... (U u -0 V) (U >' on . E 0- (U (u In In 0 U(U on In c 0 0 r N E 0 0 > 0 (U U " o -0 0 (U 0 u u tt o -0 Ou Q) Q) (U u > 0 E tut (U In Q) C u > 0 U 0 u (U f re - (U E Q) 0 -0 t! " r - :E Q) 01) 0 8- c E tt I 4i� -a >' :2 (U V; 0 4 T tt (u LLJ 0 E m - " a 0 tt 0 E 0 - 0 E Q) 0 tN 4- > m 0 c 0 0 V; 0 " (u Q) tt 0 0- 0 (U (U tt Q) 40- > V; .4 (u CL V) -0 4t� �ro (U (U (U u - >' " (U (U 0 (U -t tt (U LLJ 0 0 > LLJ > -5 0 >1 LLj tt 0 0 (U — - .5 Z' (V a 0 0 0 0 r 0 tt V) J-- tt , tt CL u (u V; c .�: U (u E ` E tt >1 E 2 tt E tt t! E (u tt tt 0 0 4- u 0 a) 0 a) LU -0 -0 0 u In Ln a) tt V) (0(U tt -0 A M O O O00 M 0 V N N 'p E ` p V 0 a) • 7 Y +i N y O (� y o C � � � � ° 0 C C on O a) ° V c c (U 0 5 0 T T N 0' c6 o V N Ln Ln O O O o ' 3 E ® N O V > (U a E u CIO C (1) C a N +� V � O „�,,,,,,, 0 7 C O LO a+ of 0 O Y N i i Ln L 7 O ~ "p •C a tn � N .� J a`) on a) rt O O V V > N a m N . a o a 0 a) U L 0 t Yn a) N O E . E ca o 3 0co tn 3 O c C7 on � 4O j a) o ro t a) Z o (U 3 N o a) on E > p a) an C N O � -0 N u a) o Q N m E O 7 p +�+ a) a a) O O a) V M M p N +� m (6 a .2 N f� V 0 N V i E N p on _ (U J N 7 V C ° to (o x � C E � � a) O c6 V a) V N C w > (u W N r- o N U U a) V ro ro Nu a) � � 3 O O io U X .>_ 3 O O H ro E > ro m t— O� 0- 0 t— cn O rA O �.a .M a) a) 7 c6 2 t on " 1 O E .N V on C m N _ tt O afire ^ > Y m y N t 0 E +! > C p �n a) m "A tw a�i N a > a ro on ro ) °" E `^ C E t c 3 o V o y C o a E � w v on V) p...... N C In 7. Y o f a p = N ru i--- Oro C V a .� s a o on i a) °) a 3 N �' N o tt E o a) ca Q) " p N 'n aU c t ° a� > c i +� 3 U „M .��: y �, -O a "� +' = � ate) on r "0 O V a) > ° a) tt on LLJ W Q V M ° a) � W o a t a _ C ° a) ro a) s_ a) ro X _ C _ (U 0„ ... u a) O � Y i ( ° �' C V u a) > r ° ° ° on a r. d mE a„ „M O U C (o O •� ° a) O Oa on o _ it Z +� ro u„ _ � 3LLJ a) C � � N N ~ � 3 > r cn NO > 00 00 N co _ r' � � C a ° V � a � E W > �1 0 W +, C 3_ r m�„w a) d„ t0 c6 - �n 1 ++ s_ a C N f6 >, Dn C L pp A > t— a) O m N N +� 0. i of i a) u t a ro a�0 �0 V Dn � >+ > C O E . t0 O tt w tV6 >+ .� t C ° t0 7 0 p 0 /rein, u V u„.M .. -0 u a) ���`� 3 o cn > a ca ca 3 u a o V 0 0 M O } O a) O p 4) J LL -0O L a) U a) V) 0 �' (n Q L a) p C O *, V) p U O "O U) 0 O O_ p p L LL 0- r Q O7 OM rj ~ E ate' m n �a) r , i m `o L 0 � a) d U IL O C of p a) a Ln O -p p p p (6 a) 3 a� / � N co 0 V m _0 o a U L a E 00 � +r m N a) p E NT Q m ) O 0a Y coo C > V) 4) O U W N L N N a' U) a; j E a, m a� U O 0 J, v LL c O � (A O E 3 N cu U E O N a) U) C a� U A L >_ p m o E a� c m vi o N co E a m m U E `—Lnn a) m .� o o Q o a m Eomilllmul ° _O U � vi 3 CO) E o a� a� U°, o L Q S p O O a) a) L O E -33) /J n UU U -0 -0 O 11<4 0 LP E -0 3 LL 3 .E N N Dn O i a) C a �O i a..i N N � O (u 3 a L (u Ed Q (� 3 o ro c ° o o E o aoi m c a N t � o° ° 0 c _ O al t a al 0 N p c al > on '^ N Z aU o c on +� ( ( '" a 5 o O c a ,, E 7 i 0 E 0 0 Ln •i r C am., 4- a) � a) O N t 7 O +tt a) -LU q N C t a) 0 ns •0 0 ns ro O Ln ru 0 a Z ^ ,� W „w...� .^ E a� ns cr) w ro a) M N t -0 3 j OV +� N 0 4- O N O O w O (u w �' > tt 3 N t c O o E � N t In N E o O M o (u pn y +� c c i .0 ,�, on ns �' >+ 0 0 w w +� a'' 1 LU � „ o N t 0 w o c�a o ? o c 3 ro °X O .E .0 Ett i w.. c c > �' > �' .E a o o > ns 0 V) N o o ,- cr) LU w C. ..x; a) N ro Z V V +� E O 7 t ro •a) i O +� +� > 0 0 m N c E ca o o Ln a ns N on o > o o ns c o f 111J�� is in a � ^ >, M y \ N _L N O, LM LL o m W C _ L N • w y 0 a) o 0 _ N N � p t7 0 0 +� t7 H L� *' a E (a H u 3 w 0 0 M ro a) o a� •� H t 0 N 7 w u O O N f6 •0 0O w Vf t C 0 tt O 5 N Vf VV) Vf `O V f6 E N Y 0 C L U L :R E 9 N O � V `� - b c a t u 3 o c � „� O � _ � � a � � O ro E ro O 0 0 > u on o $ fa �_ p a E E on O — II on E a E c a ro •E L a� ,i . N `� a E a vi L � eve"'?, � U ut a (U (U � � � N N � O w (uC E i II /cv N N m •� on '0 0 (UO C o +1.� 40 III v E • -"0 �, 5 on a O III( "0 (u � '� O t6 p .E Q +�+ Q N 00 V O- a U CY) an L C -0 N N rt ra o E aU u°�uuuuuuu d >+ VVf 7 0 a C Ili O _ uu O o E E V O V 001111111111 uu (U m E � a O >, o N a� a - c E a(Ui c a� a� m , o �irW�°uofl Liz- h N N C N f6 om -0 Q U 0 N II 2u a) o ° E II �O II D- E > Q 0 V+ 3 E ro N a w rn Q E Vf Dn i0 V) O N O +' (U "0 O N �. V �' N +� O N U _0 a � a f6 w i ca C Q > H O on �p O E O +� :Fo N E N tt ut t6 N c6 > i V t c O V C N .....�M f6 LM i C a..i >+ "0 7 _ C N •� U v n ° vt E ro ro ° ro f6 N 4- .�M q^- N N O U o E o (U $ 3 a 'O � o N ° ° N w coy In Q Q a vi � " Q a -00 a a� c oh on c6 c6 � y N 4- V) 0 a O O N u 3 Vf O tt •C .V C V tt (U fib -0 tt f6 > N a w Q, T c x: o � C ro t 4-(U (U i on V) MO o Q i U Q)w E - o it w i c T ro y Q a .� °c o ott an p Q E cr) u O r6 ��.� V N > E �' n E a a� c� a p a� c fa 0 N f6 t Dn IXw. W iiiiiiiiiiiiii ��:6 C i m ;... >... rn N N p W (. 0 o ..::,m w f6 +- c, EOn E rA,!//" .> f6 O �., a C N t6 .� N , N a N .3 Nre aia a .a f6 / C ' � M �Illl llllllf�l a... T d E N W L N a..i E > „M a� ou um W 1 > N .� a p f6 > Dn L � a � o � axi � � � ro '� p 2 +� cfl 0 0 M 0 t N O 0 E O N p�, 0 "O o O N N N �_ N c - U; V O 3 'mm V "0 -0 � o c a ca au 2 a N �' rts (U O o °- 'E � -o E (U c N O N O 7 N N N N 0 O N i t N V Q y a i Q a > 3 3 'R a o o at u o a oN 7 -° In a N (U co t a E w L r yo pn O Dn (U N N >+ 02 O O + Dn $ a� c t t a� o- U a t ca o C ` aVi E a�i °c w ca wwww V o o- on 4; } au V E -�;' t 10 a V j f6 •N j "0 V wwww V E (U i N 7 a OV 2 >+ N CD i a O +� M V on a (u a a 3 cu N y C C i N i O A u 5 EL O C . O O i O w E > 7 E "0 i E C t6 N O U E `� c6 O > a ° 0 N w a ro c +� N c c = E •N - 0 0 0 ro O N a i V > >: o E ai oo E t ro E 5 ca c N O on -0 c6 N O V .. H N N "0 > '^ 2 }, N E > " t E On > ° ° w V `� 2 o E (u o c (u ro S o y ,� it N +=� E DO co � ,O C C "0 0 � C N "0 V Vf E � c Oro ° ° 3 •E (U t -0 'O°'-n W E o 3 o N `� a� ° a� a+ +� O ro E N t g `� E ca ca t „„ E E N O H 0 O N ; 3 u N N N ro a o ro 3 o f cL cn N +� +� � au cr) w V •� N w o •0 > .E +�+ a o N o , V N W .. .cx'„ '� w O 0 ° N a 7 N On n O a� a a�i a c N o 0 Ilfr E a o V C N � >+ O i N V a.:i O C c6 a •0 C N N N _0 N Irea, 3 a E an Q 3 H " o H o 0 N H ti 0 0 M iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii eiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, m� � O > — ._ "O +J U L L J m o � L uuuuuu uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu ' C pj O _ � (6 0 3 O N �_ O ._ U m O 3 U 0 TD (1) U) U) o _ 6 L ' cn U U C L (6 KJ O O U) O O O E M E cm 0 ��uum uuuu�m l muuuull U O p- O -0 O O uuuuuuuuu z � O �� N O > O � -O C O fn � ul�ul uul ul uul ul l O U N >, U N O a O O N U � — N C Q mu > O O O "O -O O co N _ _ > N E Ov E m a a) in U > O N v (A (A ml U, _ Q muuuuuuuuuu°mul z _ _ m O O O N M Q ui >, O � N uummuuul uuuuuuuu W = U O Q Q Q O O O 0 = O � O U O O O O IIIIIII L O O — O IIIIIIIAANlllllllllllllllllll Y � " 2 � " " " ° LO uuuuuuumuuuuuuuum I uum�l�l�l cY) I�I�IPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mlllllllluuuuuuu N O U p 7 U O cp O 1111111111:1111111111 � "o riiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, In 01 UM) C O O O O a t muuuuuuul aliiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu°°°°lu O L N N Y 1 U U O E > 7 3 3 t 3 uuuuuuuuuum� mu O a) O O OU � cc, t O 3 � on (B N y V O w 0 0 a CL m uuuuuuuuu O O- O > � > �' N m >, E N N N M uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuullllllu •"J � N � � (6 � O O O O Q O � � -c v � c u) C E c.) E on a (U � m uuuuuuuuu) mu umul ' d N u.) U U_ O U O _ m u O CU tt U (6 E m VI L L -O ' O � t � O . Iw o� C Vf c� >+ O p j cn U o > m uuuuuuuuuuuuu mu Co y= > `~ (6 O O O O (6 c 3 rn c6 .N O mu 3 OL E U U U O U O c N 0 N V N a U z L � U V) +� Q OU � UO v 3 3 " Lc N •— U O V Y ' N O tN6 c�6 V uuuuu°°°°u I uuuuuuuuuu e uuuuuuuuu � r�' uuuumu r r uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuu u� u uuuumu , uuuumllllllluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu � .,� uuu U.) I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • L: � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII cr) W LLJ ,.,,,,,v �VVV"yuuuuuuu a „Vi 'I�VN a_ u J Cf) W 1 W J W V '. >� W () ..T; IIIII 'li IIIII�(l��r� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I o 0 0 M 0 3 � (U 10, z m `� N 3 Y -o (U °c N 3 3 a °' z ca o ro u z o `� c tt o . 'o a� c O 0y E 3 � O N (U a a ro a y V) O on u 0 V N > �+ N H � N N .� N N E N �' f6 1 tn V E o N 0 0 c6 3 Illlllu.,. N N .E o (U 3 O_o E tN `V) 0 c E SO tca t m lmlll I w- N oV U c6 >, -a (U a p O c (Ul _ O iC O u N _ O ❑ Now OO I LO co � V N I a (uon is t 0 E c E on +� 3 O tt 41 c_ O COL or- 0- "' 0 N o (U 'C (U -p > N N N totW ^ ° on a ^ E O On c a) r ° x O o t c 4� 0 N O 3 U r V V 0 +' O 7 U i L s` 4.7 N wN i DCN N L L C m4i �° � v a r > (U O Vtut ro E O N W N N N N _ V1 V V p 0 L 0 V a 3 ° m ro c E N L j z > ^ V_ = -0 +� N +�+ t w = V N (uU U O U J N 3 .. 2 .r 0 L N N ro a N '3 a 0 o E ^ ^ H a� u V I� c ai 0 U o a on +' c N N E > N u 0 o o c a� ca c it, 3 E o (u E (-u `� u t on ° tt E it u on it ° ( 0 -0 a > [ � c on N ; � �i/ tt � -oLLJ °' O Nu u V tn a +� m 0 on W ////%/ N N c t � N N ._ o on ti Jr o ca o .� c o c a a o 3 o L 1 EwC w (u cC N +O+ ° ( OOU t aV (u (u N C N 6 (Um d O . (U w r� z j i O N r- r � O a N (UN a N N IIII� on j((ld it au�i a c o " N o r a •> 5 r-�l $ a�i 0 3 '> 3 � on (o u 0 a a u 0 0 0 M :1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O j O 10 N N_ W N I� N °I 10 N I-I 10 10 O .o W Ol i f6 u� a, M � 10 LO LOn t^n 10 73 O N N ON N N U} V LT LT E 01) IIIIIIIIIII +�-' � `III°° n N W N �O M LO W M N N N •N m�..�w Sri M O O � � co A? 'p I I� N O O R N 4� O d C IIIIIIIIIII" ��� O o N o on U- u. m 0 c un a) N ~ N N stQ NF O m 7 IIIIIIIIIII" f0 f0 O N U '� bfI (� � i y ,�_ L C "O J i+ L N C rn f0 N rn +' i+ illl yO C UY O E O O > N O O QJ in co co U- rnU C7 0 > U- LA ( N O (U a y O 4- 0 O •N 3 'l O a)i c7 O a LO (Y) N (U on E �� IV u c E N (u m � fro C f6 1 k' d 1+ '., N r�r bn I t i on O N C w ..w".t.. ° In a) rn ro N a +, m O E m V w,CL m N h /% w f6 V rr,' Ao�w o '> t -0 O �� r 0 ti E o 0-0wa° arY .rv'N�w �" "k�7 EO t0 ��SAM' N C k `,� L Vf i �i HIM q o 0° 7 ^u it � M J uT L 19,W�r@N rW 0 f6 llu"Wu wu or,prl U fA W a . � r x Z N y po i of . ri_i W a" N O IIH t. 0 0 C O c +�, o W o , own In m aN ( V m " H 0 E �O V O o 0 0 M O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O C 01) N M 00 O � O O n IG N „w Ln O N O` M O N 00 C, i N o 00 N N O O` N a N N � d f6 N II II N0 tti" 10 00 O� D` M o0 01) V kr• O N Lo O (V D` O N r • O Illlllllrvll O tt N IIIIIIIIIIIIII O CN � ti C V C rn Y_ aTi �. E C Y j j E N t0 m T O O o N o m v v m v v v�° n v 3 O T m V }' pn U C N d "O IIIIIIIIIII' 00 000 000 O m O � c H H O N y a V1 N f6 'i�� �� rn N 0 .a v w v C v U N y (0 N d N N v N y m 3 3 v v 0 0 > c v a c o +� O Y to Y H Y Z Z J Cl- n O LA H o IIIIIIIIIIIIII III Q J m m 11— O O V 7 — � 5-1 O 0 1 N 0 0 0 s_ r y 0 t 0 .._ v y 3all 0 0 V Z on "O N O u e ' N C N V o N v o kph taro�rz�du � mE " y K o a U 'ry o F V wa X Lbli N 0 � 0 a on O N O r r a y d M a s= E r o- a) O i6 � •� � ar" ���' v,� awe ims. — d CL VVf O to, ww« q T 0 C Vf A. d _ m m Vf ate.+ r �'` i a' io ' � / s c v d tiry .4". E o N i E m O N P 0 N O r U 3 ve 6r o N N f / a a �,p�, a %l //l//4� x .° Al HIM f6 Vf 46 ��OO�/Oi9iio/7 - �/ {, a w• }4 r -O Vf -p O N IN > m �....... ++ C d 0W ` N ""�j6'' 'f6 liw!'wu wumm 13 N N LU W r O V1 O mw „ n o �j_j j q •7 In�'H t. �0 O O wry" Ju. 0 > C �/) C C �i w�,Wa C y0 O V O V - y Vl Vl O immoioim . s= .� O h lrao:, H An O O w V O 0 M q r > T � c ra V � N lj n, w IIIVumi 0 L h plllll� p��r% � i IIIIIIIIIIII � � III la ra �, ll^,;. •i w r6 2 N M V N i °o � N O V V Po � � � uuuuuu a..i o c •3 o %" Q N ' �w a a a LO vi CL y 'r, o �{k on t`a.� U 3 h E O ��IVm; +� V (Ua w 1 on O > on I 3 w ( t I ro > G tt tt ' > aU ' F o N { V uopi si ll r l �� on t on M I l O r N N N i c 1 > c J (u D a t0 O 1� C r N ,.a !Ir y /��, /�� E O N ��� ! N > " V O (U p � N p O / > N (UI L f6 N a ' J `- (U cu an N ,/ p it o u a 3 u Q „, III II Ulfff �IIII II Q N u tt a on (U (U U a V — t N Dn N V = C O 3 O -p c> N (U N f6 . cru +>+ N N 4— a... a N .o i L. , cu a u ai � C7 C N V ( V V t '� Dn > a w o O O t u (uwon m o N > , -o -a u on " c 0 ro W a V c o (U 3 0 a� a) N 2 a� >, -o E o o >. ._ -o 5 m O o E V N l7 O W T: c o c E N O cca c W W to N N (U (t r6 O +a H N ;... w N w O Q O () W r— ���������'w.m w N +� a:i (6 y "O N DA Q n N 0 U N •c N U O °q (rrrrrrf f( E p z 15 p �' u+ +� a w ,r d V f6 E V O ` V +�+ N w 0 OV Y d LOi C N O M V it "0 C C N IIIIVI' lul w r •�/ > i bu � X lull J V, u E u • N . 3 _ N IIIIIIIIIIII � � T � � � N Vi U 46 i YYY 'I� lulumu 7 O , >+ a d " u Vf >+ f6 •C C P N a) �/ aU aU N a .� N U on a �j/; N t on o c irr H 4- V co I �r N N E > w an7 (�6 O i > N N N V O V N V i w 3 V uuuuuu a Ia o � � I � Ilia liuuuu° i " y (NUC m N 1p N1 �I 4- 'p +., 0 p11 N f6 M O f6 �: 0 r" "0 1"5 O III ,I Iy �' IIIIIIIIIIII "V r- O ° 3 N P E on � N y •� d N VIA L i C V Y N i O Imp '�,f "0 > 7 w t °3 'i �rr��� :�,, +� N m DD a a 'p C Oi o I+�,f. Vf V N ° o us ui tl vv v��i I IIIIIIIIIIIIII II I IPII,� uuuul f„ 4- I N C Y O u y N N an m ru 'u °IIPIWIW�I > N '. n E , ( c u p Z, E I +� p > E IIIIIIIIIII �GL II � a 0w -0 N w 0 N W •5 N IIV N J (U •� un I p 'fl�r1/ y^ a 3 M O M o (U N („ •o c +iil! y/ rrP�� N O c .� 3 � °` Ytli i V (6 - a.., OV � N +6 i r o/%r wy 11�r�aP N +� O � ///JG. r 1/A r d N ,� air' rl aui a c N NaP „ IIIIIIIIf!(I1///Oan N t6 c C N N 0- N c > } own N t O i ' Prlr%J 1 r Ur�Jfllliw,r,rr�,arlr J jr fl1 , 111I; N V ca a� -p -p U E O N °.� G /, '1l1� I� ➢o r/r lieu r V N N N w u a� o c o o O ci MIN � r N Om E N N ° C .O d 7 '� j W 0 N p t o u c E a Z c o O a ca c �n)/� _• a r N >+ N w i c > w m O t� O N + o (u p +� 'p 0- of U c ,, V O N O N V a+ �na� +� t t6 ,+�� `� V rrunyJ�IP��II� l D Q�(� NT E i �' N N .0 O o N f/y IIIlI+ d d Jf o N O N � N z V V1 L O ("U j (6 C O w •C N 0 L ,+^%�%//�,r ryrpF�If' r l���� N LL. O m V c' w N :�e 1 �li��"1 �� LO ++ CY) ,I �f � ii «a�ari ��llNL1440/�A lu V1 _(UY w N N N yO t V m m [0 NN C "0_ O V �6 +i r (U "0 c 1� N N � tt on a w (Uc "0 � pp � «p �� �'/o+r�r°ro�oi/✓«rr�/���o/�G�lyy f c6 'j E E O C 7 O �l�l� a��n rrr�ir J�tr a.., V Vf Vf N O �(r l�Jll u'dlf���Jwlr ✓a++U<�ro�'1'• N "0N N O V c6 N a'' "0 p a a N on E oon V N N N N `� t 0 i L O O c6 C "O +� C z �: MI E �6 .� (6 .� -p +> >, _ � •� �111111UUYldlll���� n r�� J 0 ty�� 1 r � ,N O ° qj ( •O m w 3 aU V fire i N � m �_ Dn +ti 7 r l/v r(� irr �1lrl�i N 0 +� N 1Lf'a��/'� /'r I r%Sri��l;rl✓f���+%J/�// p N E t N -2 7 N d (6 a E O own N N «UrJ/I!(rr «rll� N / 1+ i 7 O ° 7 0 7 (U f 0 N 2:+ N o o ;° ! of m o 3 0 N N (,Ut , Q V ° �' O (Uu mat 0 ulWuuuumuu ( N O coa N 3 a� �i Q Q -o ° wtt E � o IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I �I I��II I �' s 3 An ro a3i a c Lo ro 3 t c *' •�, 3 c (U '� o vi E "' o ° N a c N N "� � N � .. Dn N N c c (U,..... ^'S. GL . E N N V a.., o +••, Q O �' cn 'X -0 N i (6 (U �- N j c c 0 -C V i r UIINS 0 g M � N N L Cu O O III r O 1 1' W E N E N >� `� k f f a s fi IIIII II� N °' 0 c � N O � � N O f6 V NO N in Oo i Ea V I� w V 2 0 t N N C I uuu > plllll O L O a .0V +, UIII % o E aEi a� V V > O O d ra N N c ,llllli ° 3 N °!' � N •2 c -p t a a- o om on c t/ t N o 2 (U E N� c �' �- / "L V /r V E E C) Ilullllllll +� +� N c C �` ' N on 3 O N 0 C 0 NT o 'f o roa a aoF w V E Q N V -0 N LO co t Dn N *(U'' 'O N •N V O O .. ° � t 0 O +� +� y N o ,, N N O V C N Illluul , E O V E 5 tuton Wil o III o 0 o E $ o O � a0, E t V (au)c tt 'C +� t C 'Np i p uiiluum '; N OMO y N o N C L V8 P � C C C "!E IIIIIIIIII' pp •� O N llllull'I ,m (� O N p V °+' '� > c O N o c t V N V uon (U ' N u w N a E au ,I N C -0 d u DD •� �6 O_ ,. w on "0 (6 t a a L W„' ,, ca c aU O V � aU I II .III W I' �1 �II , N E N i � t a ro ro on o i6 ca c c at N :EV E Ni - t o0 .� O w i ,, t6 � J i ° a a N E s N � L III M 0 U 0 N 3 (U u 0 tB p f�j IIW III N N N c N i � f � , µr`� J' r 'V O V N E V X 0 E f� ° > r a o o t o ° a� a l O V +� d N t 0 - LU +� c w c N O c m 7 N N � w t +� t6 nn ,(6 N O N O O N 2 "0 III. ��r// �� O m N In nu a..i N V .0 "0 Dn N IIIII",II / //% N '+ L DD m i E +� 7 N C O um uum "0 O MI • w '> m t6 N Dn > t "O N ti +� E c o c c +� a r1') W qj DD E. N V i DD L) N t -2 Vf C �Ql/ O V a"' O O W W � E N (u y N O O V 0 V .tt V lo IsN a..i n ;z? 0 N N " -a N i H In (�� Gs� U1I a� a f6 i _ N Q H +� N = � Q Q � O fII f ~ Z ILL. Q O L,_ LL,_ Z = d / � a O �, ; t o c au 2 o a� l//; i H '� a w -a t6 i V l 0 M N � on 41u�V'I V V aJ N N �� I IIII Y IIIY N � , L uuuu V 'V � w i 2 c olll ., o � ��ull� h �_ c ° O w �fl� �wlA�, N N ++ VIli N •� (Uw o au a "M E V o0 a V Q a Illi�l��lll" 7 > vi " pIlWuill / f a�i 1c 3 c a� a �M a� o .� (U o ° E Illllllliiu' M1 '� u N V N N m ud o V O o ° �' I, , �'[ is k cv p > c �.rr x °n c N o p "I E N ° �� a� .o Q, V � (U o on •� w N C N OV U V "0 it 3 LO LO a CY) E o Ln c W o aWi �' j on N , E O a a o �y/ j O a E N Illililp'! N (Ui N N i N f6 O '� r ' f6 +�+ V M IOU C2 ITS O 2 am N N N p 2p Dn III' on Ln (U0 a +� v u U 0 H II i O r O u E c 3 %/; V o '� c6 c (U 'Ilf I I� 11 N IIIIII'III Illlllllllu ' ,.,, „ f C N C c 7 a N IIII. , ca O on y �� N °c a on N uuuuuu ��• N � O � uiil"'II c c °' 3 uu" f i (6 N a LU / ca �, ro a j a o ® a� u 0 w � O rL O ,� tt r. f d N C7 r1') u���om +� / ' r„ , N tt LLj U M l �l(aa II o ° a�i rJ j,,,- c E a MO V > IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��,, cfl 0 M c c N c E (U o +� V O 4- ro o c oV ro a� (n LM w N C "O N 0 (n tt 0 U O O "tt 0 q N N N > V V N N �, O ,e a .N ' •0 c 7 on t N `- N .� >+ -gyp N -gyp "0 O i .� N 0 p t +� N U N i o � a = N o a°i a� > U w c 3 O " N •N V EO 30 "0 C s_ O 0 �, c6 c O U i t V N o V O t c tt tt "O i tt 7 ,V N "0 V � O 0 O 3 y N a c vpi w on ( C7 m °' � N � E o °; co a aU r ro N c c o O O on c a� o � a +� ro w U c U O VV N 4- N S N E X .O N on U "0 O N �' t ^ O � a EO c N :,,+ = V O O V C a w vi U c on c E 3 c 0 0 o E U p c °� C o ro au '� o u o o ca �, .� N a� •o E E a� ro k2 a 2 a a) t o c u a ° ° on U H ca w ro F .c (U � c to cY) m uuuuuuuuu E 2CL E N uuuuuumiuuuuuuuum L U IIIIIIIIIIIuIIuIIuIIu llll IuIIuIIuIIuIIuIIuIImIIIuI uuum IuIIuIIuIIuIIuIIuIIuIImuIIuI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIm�lu � OO� _Q U _>, s_ +; N oN •ONro C U N O _ O E O L1 p N• � a���' � a ' _ InO O MID b O (u � N O (U oUO + rn N Eo Oy pa�ci mu m uuuuuuuum �[ fnO CO w a M O O O O N E� �N ro U O E 2 N `Ot U U ON V ' O c N N N VI U U le Cos_ t6 N (U N Dn uuuuuuuuim uuuuuuuum •O O O O U � O N O L u N C O f6 s_ Y 4 V c W o p H 3 ro o a � cn � O Q U c c v aU V) +� - c co 0 (1) E uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu •"-' V N O �' O N y mm uuuuuuuu muuuuuuuuuuuu +� (U6 5 U U E E a I- o Lu t O N a uuu N on H U a � uuum uuuuuuuum��u Q 1/ °°°u uuuuuuuuuu uum Illl��luuuuuuuuuuuuuullllllllllumu �r �-i)) �� �`��� II.. LLJ W ! w LLJ w ... ; ...r, .. far p. kD I I "1: 'IV, I W .Z. J�ql rrrrf�(rll � ���i, ti 0 M 0. p N N to U x' cn M A 6'�. h d /Q'Rl M .. ar � O V +� N u p N q� O Dn N 04 �rim�i/ (Uc O - 0 3 r� (U r ��r5 � •r-, � a� on Y //O h V) L (U +�+ � 10,00 r a,, 'iiiiiroiimi/i t ",!!/n/rrJrJtgrrr "' o bi O f6 . �u� V IX � r II � E c � ��W�����ryM •• ' V ry 1 '�. n Innwiyrrp) •O f�l r' N '^ L ... O (Ur. iu,i.- ("" O 'O C C V U 'j'Tr V ljilum�ilGu Vf .0 Giiurn�ilGu Vf Vf a � C N U 4 N N p U O C7 1.11.. N L CIOU U .— O +� U N U a� U U) _ L _ O C ? c U O O U) O) +. +� O +J p C � U 7 U Ln Y � Q '� O O O Q c (U W X C O O > (3) N x C a" > C w O O L p C N Q U O Q O 7 / , O L L Q �� v c O p O ._ O O U O U) � N 2 LLJ n cn N V U " V ._ O O LLJ V I O G f/� f6 "O pm0ulr'�..... O "O LL fn ///pmmurrnir c V �)1 N N rill ! I1111L //1� L V) 0 0 M d N N c N c o V Q > V N V f�6 Y 7 (U2 (6 O i > d 0 C Y E p O O 2 p DA N (U7 a V 3 �' 3 ro on 0 E ro aU c (U +� a c -Op c c`a E c a � N 0 O 0 T C �... N � O N Dn i N a� ro N aU > on a 3 N 3 •� V 3tt .. ma a� 0 y , O ...�.... O N C f6 `1 f6 0 0M O a..i IXtt ������ DA O 0 O N a N ' _ N am"' o N N •� N o f 0 c 0 > c aU 0 on (Up o o U u > 3 3 0 c � N c6 t ��' O on � _ _ c c am E (U O +� N N C DA Vcrm q w C +� C 0 O O (U o o °c (U o o (U (U N 3 N (U i 0 a t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 L� � ca LLM � c cn a E H Q > O O 3 3 3 C7 t O 04 cY) O U V 0 - w � " f 00 V Q) Q cl� � > > f � 0 0 'p p N z /; ° a aU > — m c (Ur tt _ on O c r,r,ra "Im"m.rrao -p N tt N •O >' >, r 1 �jiih� N N N V � -p (U +�.i d O O U C Vf 0 0 +�+ p (U > C (UV t 3 N (6 N o "`dw !eu'iA"' c N •c c � r�ii > N ou o O 0 o i •>, •� N �J w�'ndyr�i/ � •0 v O 2 o -� U � w a V :.,, c o c� 3 > a) N .'!�2N 7 4- p uE0 3 o aO .N o w E o p ,E 'a v fO N 0 z 0 _ N w ��������������� J > N N 0 tuta..i LL E > ( a, � E .E o c X p O p N 0 0 j Co 0 3 t c c C p H 0 E (u Q) i V fO r,. ....... o a E a) t ro t a a) a s o a (U t 0 0 M L /i 0 15 rrrrr �� i Q r r ti O i t U)v� SO)? coo 10 Q V g a .o r� r ti r � l0 J / MR,& t L "I;�Illllf�j 0 M T E O ° 0 N O O i 3 N o (U o °' 5 ° a V a O.. O N Or- N O O -O EN d O ,m N N fiii¢ rr r +N.' (6 Q C w m V w V > o t a ojo N y m 0 N O fV6 C t +r C N o i d N d (6 C V N a„� � N d N ° t N r, ]ifqq O _ O a f6 V -O 4- y V N i 0 N t 7 w � y N +' �' O N O N .7 N a a O N . .q � (U ( '" Q 5 c z is o N ....a� o > ° a� x a aD au 0 3 O aU u O O i 76 � � V � .� z w w ca z a Q � u 3 a ca � ca C7 t o ro a� t 3 CL ? o +' O N O N 0 •N i 0 N N T N u vi C N a E � aU V > ° -0 c NN ° w a c '� N Vcao V w 0 (U UO a N C mmuuuum0 N C a..i y N ° t N on V c i N .� ° c N N 0 N c N c 0 y 0 '°_ a f6 i N 7 N _0 tt N N OV `� L +�+ c > O i N O "0 C f6 " tt c 7 Dn V +' N f6 N N a N O tt - +� on o0n E t c +� i uuuum� ^ N N c N +� O T vi ( V `� 5 c o N N LU � 3 oNn N +� o o > c N N caO 0 N N o a� pEo � RD In ° a� ro N ro o N aU au o on z a� ° ro ro ° ) w u (u on o E o -o -o ro +� c -0 ru ro 3 x .� t o a� ro t a°oi ( m c N V E u o a 3 to t6 to N a N o o E o O c uu uuuuuuuuuuu Dn j N — f6 f6 N tt uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu N _ �••� i t N � E i ° -0N 'o N " N N tt N N i O N N E N C � 0 a ,0 tt -0= N � V -0 E o o N o °' _0 a� t > -o a N O o ro O •E 76 O N ai N o (U _ O E 0 ° o N a� � aci a� a�i on `� ca c aU c V on E a m -0 o c t a E ro 3 u N _ a� N ro N o V 3 0 � ro > a on aU N � E ' w _ (U -o ° E ( c ro N N V 0 c +� O o 0 V N N + ca N +� N V ca V V O z x co � ro > W m m uuuuuuu a..i a-+ C "� > i U -0 N LU t 4i W � � � a_ V C c T ro 0 E V 0 3 a3i N C N a L o E — V N V O ° a o (U c rr) W •N O E ro T ro d....�M N O O O on O o C N i tt E -0 c `� o 3 E o ° ( E (r aril„r a ° ro ro H z = u E o z cca �i o c ° ���� ° N t: +� 0 w...�„ tt M a fr yr �V r r �� ate. r / K� e lr K�� CO l✓i/K`,,, ��� ✓;//j �� „d � �Itlldd I r/ �, A KK;�!rr�i" � 4—J O LO f i K� a-J CO a-J a LL M �i� ��l%///l�//rc���� �Ky ✓G Gl%/��✓ wi✓ ✓/ �sat, a /✓ Ln Or � �fSe1t All om d'g �%� /f a i ° �n W W LLJ LU III�f�f N M art / 'l I > O m V O w a> N t p N f6 t cV6 al cV6 o i >N i/����� m m N Vf Q O O 3 a o N ////�% r V) O "0 t Z co C7 N04 +� ,� 3 �' ° o N on o %r a > m O O O C O p d CO r j/i *'p V i i tt •0 ro •o�rn 0 3 �'�' c o 3 O i N C t O Q on E � N c U on .M tt is N on c p co c U i > >+ >+ >+ O O Q N V V V a✓� 00 00 j d m +�.i 0 u 7 Q 0 r � � l j i o N a y N (uO a O o V a on > c 3 tl u °� o o o t o c 2 N N a o o aU tt (U o o N t (UN o o aU aU (U N > N %�i%/ N o +� > 0 ca ci E a bu 3 a au N N V a� O c o o w ro o H N V is a H V >+ 1 N (U (UN N ll) N i i a t (a on t (6 - O N Dn N t a r N umu N N N N V Vf •� f6 N o- E "O V a..i i � E N ,,w�ryry +' N au E O V au c (u +� O tt E M V 00 fib N •C N V N tt •O "0 N C N y OV C 3 ? 0 ro on a ro au ro > N 6 > o ;� N V o V o N > }? a $ N 2 > c a�i a) c w or N c a w •5 c 0 V 0 c 0 � c +, , N = 3 > t O o �o ro O m ro (u O ro 3 .tt c ro 3 3 r •C c o N V E E p N N to fo o ,., c > O n N .� N N w t6 c O ,, 0 c 3 u O on E Lu W r N u V O 3 _ N C a E +� � � +� a t V � a a� •� -o ro E c X N 0 a� c V N f6 V O N "0 � a f6 O c (U 3 tt o w .E c c o_ ro o E o o c i on (U on � ro o ro ro 3 N E ro ioru 3 W " za a a� 3 , " a� `� (U E o 3 O .E ° o E a2i a �, N > (U In "O , fO "O N f6 O O N t 3 *' N iJ L fo V fo V � +� H w it �Ioam M M r Y E }' £ o O o C6 � C E 0 O 'E +. o. � O IIIIIII II O L v 4-J -- w w v O O O J w12 3 O O ) 7, n � oo V oIN op 111 4- i, �� , J �. rrr//1ie,J a co Wil c N N v of O p E y 6 W CS O U C w O Q O E Y L Lr)O ^ O N Y p I� v � ^ Z n r "i"Iff o � kvz rr�f 0 ��yl !y 1 �� �f �r�,y/ ✓e rf',u,: ��jm f�rMIN/l% I �VVVVVVVVVVVV�VVVVVVVVVVVVV III LLJ w LLJ Lu IIIVVi .IJ � L-' I � � M E f o o c o E E to to in °" c o = E E o uuM } V ME•� c is u w c 3 E N ai c u on IX c onc E o ru t 0 (UN .� N 0 N V V a c N 0 w ttt on V on Dn V N 7 N N w `� .Q c V N O Dn w Q Dn O N +� N C t6 i O +� O N +� O N a 3 a won °c N o o cu N V V (U a +� N OV OV = OV V) Z Eit ���� p on V N V N > N i c c t t6 N c N 0 7 N L t6 a Vf U > Q a U 00 N N N O i N on j LLCI O ++ O C O N O y c Dn N W O N t OO i O O N c t c 'p N i Dn "c N Vi Vf CO N a) E tt a to a to N Ntt O 5, w V C a..i V U!I a..i C -C tt c 0 V V IX V N c N p w w C o °� i 0 3 V w a) o a `^ E o Dn i tt a o 3 o N c o f �...: T tt an a > c��a U c`a 'n N a� Q a ° Q �^ o E E V O V .- oEn > c c N N N a c o w > a Q w..°M own own N ro N O N o 'x ,, E N ro V O _ a� to .� }? H cn +� m ma V H N cn c U t6 Z +� H t N t" -p N tt c V N t O N VVV�� III aQi > :E N a°i o m° > E lry t6 N O (UDn p c +' � t6 on O E 3 O .N "C N w V E c `° O (UE (UO N � i t6 t�6 O E � V N c +` 3 O C7 •(U >+ C V 0 a V (U+� O 7 c :E O a aU to o (U aU (U i m .N i O t H E N O C O N N tU jj/ f o a V on Eam U'a E O +� (U i r� on a o- tea 0 N 7 LLJS E Nro 'p O rn cc E N V O w Q (U7 Dn MAC rra w 7 N (UO LL. O V E w w O N i . i a N C w > �r) N c 7 N V N O i t6 �IVuu�N wie'+ Icy L;, i i 1 E a >(U ro rI my I�fll �JJlrr� � a c H '0 to � m f �fffff;�Jl �I/lam, M � 0 U N O f o � 11 O urn v� � � L IVf ��� IIIIIIIII yy� „ m ��� ��� o �•�! �"III Illoli!ov u r I� ,�r„a�„wr✓F,rrc�un�lnHYrdw�UdNViV�iVi�uwlbl'�CW�VN lY� /� r ; i LLJ � q Wi 6I �W W cfl M C ma L L a O- N O�+ O ru N > E a� t +� orir ii a c °' on ca c ru i i/��/ d u a N E c o A%Di / l own ,N .0 n p U o N t //r a) U N �' N O O p "p ru o •o c N a) E ra O a� o 'b a� ° °� a E E a�i '/i ,N N al a o O 2 (UN C V w im 7" H i6 Q a� U +� o N O ° N 0 °' E o on 3 t t6 c 3 0 t t o E N on o N N O a..i N a..i N i ru •� N N F O I` aDO a i O� (UO N f6 3 V "0 co E +� c � a� +� -0 a3i O E 7 •- c a u c '� o E 4 o w aU 3 3 3 (U `� N o > a� 'o N > (U o a o N N w Dn a� +� t6 O N C C •N w ._ a tt .�....M o CL 3 a o U >. a o 0 0 .� (u >, >, �. �° u � a o O N 'i C t"6 i 3 N N .d....�M t6 N N � t6 N _ a) i a) o c ro 3 3 ..... o 3 a; o N a s t U c c w....M ro al E ro N a� t `� j c ,, o o U a a� c c a 0 a �' U O a� o O O a� a� ro ro U +� on Q N Q t06 E w o O o a o H U U to a w N a C7 N to m i6 Ln Ilj on O o +� t6 h �_ U c6 N (1) N 1 r uuw 4o U w E2:, (U aU 0 ° N / O c E rott o 4- E o `� Dn �' O ++ N -0 C a) c O C Y "� �- V U o C a) V t6 +� 0 t a) a° 3 o u t N o +� c U c U S E o o ? ° a, 0 3 3 O ° 10� t6 o (U 3 O a� �' % a� u o ro (U U N t6 MI Vf w w t6 > '" 7 1 > t6 N a +' .� i > O +� a) N ti W, O d t6 a) a) 'y +�+ d N (u t6 N x �w N al V o �' o al .� t u N o N tt i6 7 tt U N V W �' o T C "0 U ro 0 N > > 3 a N o Lra .�' O N > O on O c w V O O U + E '� -0 N C C t6 E i� ������ y, t 7 a) O o t6 t6 C N 3 w U I....... z Er, N t6 a) -0 ..: c6 N x on N �i a) �' O n w 0 i w N v t6 •92 ±� " .5 a w r N v) 0- "0 o t 7 U .- N � O N o 0 U (u ql ff(r a t6 U `S U w H lirm,' 66,11 ti M � �,�,,, � / . r �D + i41 V i f 04 co f �I COMM M'l lowaid U VON i�i, jjllm l rir j u+a«so,n•m loll r �i'%Ifl"1 IN LLJ W W LLJ co LLJ W(S `rrlll ���jri(' ,:'0 1J 00 M i oi11� N y N t6 N O N 41 0 m m c 6 iii o o o oLn in c o t tt ° o w O ro a� 2 o 0 V w a > v V o u (u ro ro a, Ln > 3 a a 'U, a to -° o O o N O w >+ N E �+ O r /�% o $ t u E 3 3 ro 0 V p , c i , E �' o (U r 3 aQ) rryi ; i6 m >. c N a -o " +� (U O (uO Din (U t „ c N o- r ca _ 3 q O (�6 N V � y O V 41 O E on N qua O 7 i E V N E N p (U > Vo 7 V u N Lt1 C � ff (U t O � o on on Ln Ln O a o > c o '� .� 0 E o q'i�� w N "O E m Oam t •- m N "p E N "O q m m — Z O on tt J x V (U -o 0 o c '" 0 E a, V o m t O 2 O O c .� N p E _ +� o a� u 0 w O V a (U c E c o V au >. ff to N p t6 V p N t0 .0 > +� V i c (U Ln V c c -o (U v V a on � 3 u a u tt c ° w 41 z u a on o on O V a on on V (u N •a o � 'Q) N 00 c o aU LLJ „ (U on N + V ro > tt ro N_ GL C� z A > u (U a� ��f rra w u���� C V O t6 C W u ui aci E o o on ° a w C 7 `.za �������� j 3 N O tV6 7 L N i, C +� C >+ i -Q 0 N a +J��� O N t6 t6 tt C C p ° f / / °qlf lrr 3 u a u +� a w N to w e, o 0 o '"% M (U 0N 0 ro w U N� t ro"I ro U o is °c oCL aU H � J o o 1 ro j a••r o N N In N O t o 0,i a >, a ono v +� b ro 2 c U � a� c (U a�i 04 trt- o (u a°i on o T 0 V1 c o a� '^ ro 0 0 3 p 4i Urt c6 O i c O i 4+ cajr�ir, co p t O N y i CL ._ y o on E i .a� j w a r-. o / I �a� � z s N on a c ) P. � +� c ° a b a; E y E U m t tu V) o M w uF dJ, .k k rFr 4ds f!J r,+r M N 00 7 "� rFr r dj, .. qd „ f!J II g r f!J tii •� C r r f .do CC. 0 (U (Uf6 4ds'. f!J US 1 I r', C� V WI C � P!J rd, dfi C' (6 .ra Pr. Pf N kN -�(Z�-� Dn k N S,7 a d,� rNJ 'k N', m f!J r✓� '" k N i S!J 0 C 0 C C1, . N f i t7 fidk a .x1 f!J, o k�a r� r✓� 0 (6 i C i 7 (6 (6 ..�.I I�..' .+:. Ira r'r 1,01 r,D� a qj � a x r e i a fl% � o :E E+� r V Dn N V N C V u (6 'C (U0 (U ro (u >, °" N 3 N ° L rt 4- 0 N -o � ( > a 5 on p p 5 N 7 00 N 0 z 0 N � ;. U C � C7 C �, U N N N 0- C p� O O O C V 0 7 •� — C 0 7 tt N N V N '� }j `S L `� N 0 N c 5 � � 0 3 c °o I m � ro W N 0. 0 (U oa5i a Cd 3 z o '�' o crt (U crt crt 00 � 3 :z: V C J t .. 0 � (O (O C N N C V N N N N C V E z N z N N rW W V C Z p 'gyp O •C I C - = V � n :E N 2 N N 2 u 0 2 2 c N 2 "t N w Q j Q j to 0 on N � z � � m a � � ca � � to a z C7 z C7 cn z a 0 N TMI V O an V C f6 N a p N W (uy i "u 'o V •u O N an i E W +� N V > O O ro , a,V ro i ( a(U c ° a +� a o LfI N w an (6 4� p on t c 0" ro c t •� c 3 U � •c w (uro o 3 0 o H w (U " ro 3 t +� o "' E E ,o o u E o o a>i ro O o O au , Z t o o ( .� H �o ao E `� ro w a9i M 3 � o ro o- � a� 6 c E (u t o t; -o o- ca on ro •� � c � ro o o E o. ro > o E N au .E III III � p � V 2c � � •p � c c6 •p t V Lmn V an C W N O C p uum uuum C p C on M O V a� (U c c �6 N � E c uuuuuuuuuuuuluu uuumu 'p N O Dn C E E Dn O C C N � C � L' N Nrn N C O N V > i O U L� W W (t N t W OV IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII O uuuuuuu � `- a) p ca 4) (� c m u uuuuuuuuu L mam�uuuuu�m ma a) ca cn ` Q O. (6 YO mYU U U� ma) U > a) O O> QOaO U 4% O O c6 U m l O O O m00lpu0uu A U� CO 70 iz L) 0 L) 2 ca mll°°° U O � i 0 o 2 U a) i cn o .0) W �_ E ca E ca cn U c c cn O > a W O O c �_ .� U) o Q IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� III1"IImmmmuuumu 0 uuuuuuuuur r� rloo,uuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu �� � � m i% V IID 10>0 0 ., jr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 ry, r, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLJ cr) 0 W GL LLJ Wl .rt. r m r W J W r; Ilu'vu i��ll((((�Ilj k ;L lieu, TMI TMM 41 M Y N > Nr N o i6 N N a..i N V V V Y >+ L f OV d V 0 N L_ @ o ° ro w U o y > �V � c E > u o ro u a� o o V o > > CU an i w +� O o IN n V O N o N CO qj a Q o (U a� > 1% 0 \ ro N o c j i c � ,� U a u au o i a a� ° V %/ a) , 30 - 0 415 o V) MINNIE o u 3 3 j � �� � .E a c $ a� o 3c irrr i r,,, CD U > r r c a� _ 3 _ an c ��/ ' t LO > o E 5u � 3 a�i N ro o o (U c� aU � o ;� u c ro a rntt ro ro (u a� ro c o o +� x V� a N N o°n N o N 0 on +� ru E ° N 3 ro w LL_ N N V ro o -C V i' >+ C on LL tt °V L t o N N o N +� Vi on w a -0 >+ E V C 0 3 0 3 ro > t o E t -a� on a w u o w N 'N `�' a c c on tt c '> c c c c +� c o on N o o .° a � c o c (u �' o o ca •o o c �, ^ a7 f6 �' y i O O ci6 �' a °O a i (� E d a..i 0 V d o a..i N o ( o o % 5 au °�' > a�i c w a� 3 - 0 3 ° O N on 0 c o "0 N N > c c 0 N N N o N 0 t6 N .� c o a �, O '� •on c6 H c6 V a c w V c6 c L_ 3 m ? "00 0000 •c6 N Q O > U LLn on U 3 (U N c o N ro w o O N i "O - N 7 f6 N a..i E 0 t 01 , N o V N N f6 VI V .o •N N O 7 'i .0 V Y -0 on tt E o a V N j O �; E w O V 0 i C Vf .° V m Dn t o ru(U o (U on ru o O Dn •C _ O , tt on - Y O O f6 E 01 N a V C �- �- won V w OV a.Ti C t Ln o f6 Vf tt VVj w +N.i +�.i o C N N on � = M 0 ro c ° >, c 0 j N ° N > o 0 c v ro a 3 -0 (U t o N O � E _ vw� > O a " N o O " c a N 0 N ro N c V .N O2 t o O "O j O N "O c6 O C 7 > a� "r -O �; L C a..i C(U tti 7(U In 0N .0 N N E a w .5 ca u c a (U c E E oc Eo oi Nv N on �, �, x )(U 0o 0- c o V o o N 3 c > oon V c j 'c ro ru N Vi j c c c o Y ° `� E �" ° on on a ,� 0 on > E E c o c N 7 •an •i 2 a UJI N O r_ r_ V 0 N f6 N 1 N C "O w N C O2 on 'O O- C N t a N a..i CL V E V o a w a N o a� .o a� U N Lu o E w 0 ca co m N u ° c O r N L c ca N ro on cEa .� > `� E ° o N c 0 E N ° ro .c'L. •� N N L 0 a--i •C L -o >' N (O ELu N N O C a N } o cr) •c'L. GL Ln 7 o .- N N V i E tt r O t 2 a E t N W W W w o N w N +�+ >+ C 3 N N t O O on —a- c0 "C O t 7 N o > r> z? O r- 3 ro E o o y c N a -0 .> $ LOT -0 t >. cn Lll c6 0 c6 o N N N E -0 7 V N O C c6 V W � -p E O u E ca c caon N .� a ;glia�j w ( N o +r - R o 0 0 0 a� o ° E > ° tt ++ N O � O S o a > >, c qJ irm,' (U a w > a) ro 0 > -0 c o o c w 'E U o H w . 2 w ro w � w 3 o a�i w ro m E tt E � a ° a N N TMI CU ra _ +� " , E �° " "' E ca 1 N Z t N c N 0 t N t O O E E a� (U ro w V ZO: 3 ro c E c On w L O N .— > - N N .N O O N c N Q, u = E ° c >. 5 ra ra ra N •ra E E N S E a .o � q o o f m E N N ° ° E a on o N a E c a� E o V > > ;, E E o O c u E O 'on a �' N 3 au V O V , o on rya 0 c u E au o4 u ul ro L � ona� u O � totau N ro 'p ° r6 .V N N r6 OV � N m i i m i O E S O o r6 +� N w a c o (U a� ° 3 ° .N IN tt '� E ° t E E 'Eo � a E E oLL. N o cca ° E a E a>i is o �' .� c t t c � o u o � o E � t � +� �' i w C V t y + ; ... a u on aEi a � T ° Q a� ° E a I ai ° > (u3 a� o , E o a�i cv u N a c 3 on on N o N 4- c c (u > u � •E o $ 3 w o o H ° E o r uu � qj N o d •— i C a.." N IN it w N c6 .� p E O N O N > N ri II tt y +� N E ro (UO +' a N on a E -� •> N (u C ++ Dn y w ,V � N N L v N N w N ra E D u 3 c rya c + O on aEi o ° o > o- c o Z ca U °c ( °c ° a 7 ° -O �6 N 0 E a vi (U ro E E E a aci am a � c ° o E t � E +� V - ;; ca N Ln N E > N o V o -o N W c " N y o o °o tt ff 1 > u au on •o o a E i c a c v) N t > c o a In tt tt c mc E y E O a mO O .° (u (u _ t o Q a 5 o N M h 4 9 r ra ra N > > E ° (u ° a E N ra o (5 •� `� � •0 w Ln c u >, o f a s � w u a� on o f U N on Q) °V Q � H +� O N H °V +� C rm6 °V tt tt on L r�6 N >, N .o r6 a✓ + 7 On > O V N VO N m > d on ,c mo Z E (6 •`-^ -!-UV O Qc >' i i N t O V on �/" l//�� 40+ am 0 V O a Vf r6 V O N > on _j CII on N 4 u N O on a it >, � N � OV 'O r6 N v_ � w V U itN r6 V V i+ °� - 'ra o m ( o ro r. era L z N a c LLM V w w E a_ Q. r6 � y t vi c > O w R ra � (UN O E cn O i+ G o N w r� r za N j, V +� i6 7 -p ._ +�.� m � � � V N c c N N a� E � E a��i c ;a c _ u, ar y i In a l0 biiia fA U +� " to M N TMI N c ua o c •= a� � N a� m C N t 0 ,O 0 'E N > C +.i E '; o •N 0 t6 "0 DA O o CO "0 •N _ Q t w N 4' N V C +�+ N DA N u n C N Q C a C C 7 y > is a � � V 3 � V E t6 E (6 V u3 w V k O •� to � 0 0 V p •i N E to " c t Dn ;- +�+ N C o +(U •� w C t6 i E +.+ V •V Lf _ N O N "a '� N E a O .+ 0- V O OV L d a- y �� n. .-w-t-ir�rm u w d �is�u,:^r�+� v .e:,.t io O cn N to c a ro 3 0 � cY) o o �;:w d E e o r o fO t N t N tO C p Nlo > +� 3 0 V � " y a Dn tU a..i o O .� V > C .� to _ a N c V + U � o o ro O a c to o .o '> w ca N� c „„ N on N E E N N t 0 a .� > F o_ t6 V N 2 c o E �- E a� � V o � O {�r r N O � o "0 "0 .� 3 j 6'Mii hi moow.., f� > a..i "0 N c6 N + N x iw v�+i ��wr av�y y o u c O ( N E E �,„. ra k9i a t V 3 ro c oa o to ro to a; c t c 0 0 a t6 0 C t6 C N V Dn N 0 -C a) C 2 V 0- to to V O -o a� C a to (u y on 7 w N • w a > tra (u ° o o •� o tea aEi ^5 N +� c c N 3 c > c ro c a z +� 0- - N o N E 3 a ° 3 �' 3 axi oc a ° -0 axi ° }, aU (u •c c E N °' N to N -o to .E to V O t X E t U N 7 n N C N +� O N O O c a v 0 0 ( !g a � c ro on .2' o t tA ea N N to C Dn C C N N i Dn N N L w _ t � > N 3 o N a tt •V O tU t6 to N •N C N N "� ,E C C 10 3 V t 3 o c ° o c a '� to ° to on ro 11: _ ,������� t 3 �+ +� Q E '0 U C N o c N N i •� c 4; c vi .c t 0 C tt •O c m ac V 3 Ntt � �' O c a t N 'N a o to aU o +° tt +� a� o c on ro (u on o 0 t to E +� W �„ > O �' C E c C ° Q �' E to to N > > V u a) to E a N 3 0 ? vi (U °c o t o > o (u o 3 N E E V V -0 w u N +� c t o w N t o a ro E N C N 41 w w ..t.,� 0on (u O Ntt a O to N Q •- +.i oV C �a 4� N 0 w C r c S) c c �; on o c c N C c 7 to a 0 LLjr� -p O +(U a 0 >+ N to V O N 0 �; 0 -0 •N N tt 0 C V N O C N C N N O E .V C Vf 0' to C N V "0 C N a ;;��lflrr 5 aon °' °' roY �' -owt a > to +� a� w t au o- 0 (U W 0 o C o to E ro E N c a c u u h Ireu, 3 a c 3 `a o on c N E 0 ca .� E 'Ln Q a u qq N TMI on � o O aU w E o d us 3 >, 4° ' N on p o o +� },a. aU u c 'E p ° E 4� c�a ) o c o O09 a ai N a I ro u ° u O (U N V V OMID N 7 N X 0 o c6 7 •c6 E � y C w .O 0 m O d O i .. O N N IIIIIIIIIIIIII on 'p N O N tt `. O 1r O >, V O N " i .0 r��l���'i N 7 O t O i m i C i 4. N N N tt i i 7 i i O V N a > o W ILL. u t ca t (U O c Oo on on oo H +� c on LLM a co cV C: I!! k co aU p c a 0O O V p IIIIIIIIIIIIII ��.'�i N +� O +�+ C m m — N w ._ on Q 0 � w N O c •� H on � � �_ o tt ° Q c g .E o > a o C t tt Y N o o � ?� o -0 3 o- � 6, 5 ro , t a� ro � �' ro Ec N o o o i; ro a cn (Uo c„ o loli pp 0n0 wu N o cO N3c O c c c E E a aioo c ° ° X h�II�II�I IIIIIIIIII o E J N o Q � w c j C �_ c c 3 E ro c E w ro E E °' (U °° = o c o° a o° on 3 3 u .o > o a3i o Y o �IUi lilll aU O V V a) 2 t wWOF 00 00 -0 u .E > m w - a a ililil II�I� ro ro o_ aNi E IIIII U� a� aU (U O N IIIII :, a- c 4- ca c won E > own } o +� o ro V E c 0n o O N pI (1) tt i w a� a) o o N t a N w o O o O a �' N 3 N C N z: V O ru O w y p +' E V n 'N r� a > ro c �' ro N N u °c E . a a a E c ro t > N ... O C c6 Dn V W W � E � t � E " � o, on au IIIIIIIiI z.. w H � S ° au a) ° E a tt a c t V t � (r) W n ~y,, c E (6 i i E .. t on .> "0 w W O N i O O +� 0 O O 0 +� ,:. r,.) I - � O E E � c 3 a� o � (U n0 1- u O > ca l E a� a� Ln a s a > c u a� � � � 0n oo (-U (Cu � (u °? o0 00 � � (Lun . N TMI o on -o >' N V 0 N O N N Q) (U 0 +� 3 C u a t = a 0 Z N 0 N 0 t ^ °N ^ 3 N ro N i a c t �' O on c O N �, a �' N N on ru ru 0 > w C °.a 4° N ° °c O •ca C VVf t .ca ...r O i o o " 3 E c o on 0 (Ua � •� 5 ,, o c � Mi V� M tt tt 4- tt O "� LM 16 tt V V � N � O N O >+ �' on N t V_ a t N 7 N c u on (U mi on VO c N ca O +� N N N O x...r. LA t o o ... N a a a a a u cn N � a C7 a� ca N +� u o +� w u a� � Ln co N V •� 4- C D O N V N on N O O U (u (u 7 tt .� i t i M N N a O W W M a; ca C o c6 5 ° C (U o a' ru o t a 3 0 E c ..... a on y -o u ma a t V w ro o (u � >, c a O N +� V O _ , N w N •U o > ^ +� i C O a V N ;., •X N C c _ 01) °' w �.... N ro u 3 ra N O ro rn ro 0 7 p N Y 7 c C �' o Non c6 > on a c V u1 N "� on N +� C N N N N a� w ` E 3 V o N ru( V r ru 0 y a o t aNi N N c N 0 N N � V on N c a " � N 0 C N 0 O on > 0 on O i 7 ^ O N .�� '�p N O t N N tt +� N on on V c .i 2 " C cva ` V a 0 +� � o ca c c w 0 3 ° (U c on N u on � a tt c t of o o ^ C +� O V •[ .V "0 V "0 O C "0 tY6 V C 'C ru 0 O C V > V O N N N N C i a aU ro (u o 3 a� �, o a� o a A > = a c c a t o N a o O V a� N tt p o N 0 +� ° a o ro C � V � 3 �, (U (U on ro on N E V > o c a� 3 C = ro �' E ° �o O a ca aU ro V ma .E V E 2 0 0 ` ° •� 0 0 r- (u V ^ a� > V > �o ro a o c u au m ,, ro ro W O O -o c E c o o aci a > > N V M C O M a > N on +� a o C E V V m 0 N O >, -c c - + t C .o tt Vf > N V O c (—u (UE �' O N N -!-U � mo on(U I c6 Vftt t i t c ca c am3 > N J N ma C N N 1/�f (6 V N N Dn c N E u m° ro 0 3 V)on tt ac�i ro(u Ea a o ro E t E u aU o c V > rott o 0 on V c LU am a 'r:;,7 O 7 i N 'o N on '- � 7 N O ...� . •> i on 7 iWLLj w ,� cC6 y t V "O � N r $ O 4 n a T N N o N tt i...... c .� 3 p V t � on > c ca o N J E a a a c V o o O (U +� aU 'x a� n m E E c N c ca a +� o r .. .M E E N E a on ca on °' E E o o w M c a ��� o E! uO a r o o V c a °- > o o c a E °�' (U UV ro o n N N c _ 46 c _ L��.. "rt�irm/ Q .E on w o o + o _ O ro c H vEi vEi E `� u E cfl N TMI w o c .� fr 7 ° ��� C 0 CU o 1 N v +� O 1 +, (u aN-, N t Q , O > C 3 O N o o (U ca •°' ° E 3 a> N "O (Uon a a N V c ° N rt a°i 2 W M au o ° °�' tt (U c t 3 c t p Q c a O 7 V nu ', "� C N N m 0 ��� �� (5 V 7 "0 O �' w,'J% Jti �, pg f�0 N) ° 4- E ° o (1) t '� ia -�'" C) (V M ��r° E co O w tt L0 N t •V " ° O N � I J L � L. N O N N C V O N III •O V V 7 7 N �- V.. N 41 N w N N a_' cam 6 o V •a �'Q a ° C t ° E U tt w 0 N / L V t6 •p N y �r IY �,a ,... i U C t V �, ° V 7 V O O 4 a N tt N t6 O wi o� >+ n (U C tt c O > U o u>, ° (U °o V +' on N .� oan r 0 t C - � n c am 0 4— . N N N C N a V " N •n N t6 Y Z on � a •"+ — O o6n t a V t V V C tt > oaoa) > V + O° oUa N � E oa Q N N +� t0 N _ N O m O L L a y O t6 y t6 i > Q N f6 on � V t `O t O t6 X 7 O - N O N 7 C N N a am (U N (V t6 3 ) N 3 a o o +` a C tt L � _ql t I O d (U ° (U ) on on O d 3 i N �, w O Dn «z 3 o (u a �� CIO � I i„I 0 N V C � l L .. V .� i m N N I�� 1 N > 3 > w N n c 0 = 7 N i O ti (6 C 0 "0 +r C V "0 N E N '� •� f6 on ° a) N O w �' '� a o 0 LLJ > w E N V a�MO °c c c W �; ° •E N .� au ° -v w ° t > 'ca a c o >> 0 c ° rt O a� , ) > E -°c ro ,., x c � U N I z cL E E 3 �' c N to V E O N w ` °c c Q) M N 7 N " .E N +� W a) E t N (u N c i on � O _ m am >1 w > o tco on OM .E c E r ;iii N f lr( ca o ry > N oy m' O 'n •V N C 0 p t6 '(U O t6 E t O t6 E h V V %'% 1 t � U /rein,' Z +� m �m� ti N TMI p O o o a on W o L o H W aU � o E t o (u g c 3 0 0 0 3 o H °N' ro .� N m > � l 4 7 c6 N -p +.� V { � N c a..i V m a 3 ° N V Vi °' o > on u E c a aci - N L a c w p, tt > � •� w a� c > (U > a; o a? - E 9 jc > "� •c ° Lon Lp O N 0 U+ N V '� W +L+ N O N V N 0 t ro o N > w O N m •o o on > V a (Uu E ° E E ca > E o o '- N ._ 3 E O o m 4- -o > o Ea' >' 7 Vf i E 2 (u t6 > N N O c6 Y E (uV O °V N O ::5 p p L c +' •N y c ,; . r w E N •i N C p N a' y 3 .O O Ott o t 3 a) 3 c ,° o o %v o U - a .0 a o on E aU E _ 0 0 L N t C t6 p t6 -C c6 O 7 O 7 00 V on O +� co V 0 V Vf t6 a V N c V L (o 2 L N L > N f6 +� , tt > Vi ffi` U j fi/i _ p m O O +� N O 4� ✓ , N Fa Fa N Vf N � WI N i N 'C C +�.i 4 45', u,✓ n' ii ,J, ///✓ c _ O o O N +:� a on N N i L O V N r k /i� ✓ r i DD O as it E k r r l /P✓i ry ✓ / 1� N O o t6 on w_ t6 "0 N of //rf✓ i ,fs�I✓�Il✓,;C O lz o >' E E L M ro +� a +� Vf O V1 `+ i irk/x r i Y,? s✓r ff�� N O V t6 N f�(✓ his t6 L O O ,�, c V c6 O X c6 on "0 sif ✓ d��Ir�i/a�� a 3 (U V aU (U o o r ' C�i (u � � a a� � � o � 3 � � � � a� � N > N V 7 0o 'p ++ +�+ a 7 N +�+ a i ✓y�n �� E '� `t aci c o � N _ o ( x c E a V, '° a o � Q u w (U � o E ii N N C a' O Vi �' N 7 1 ✓r rp' ' +� "O c N N N N N + on + > N c c M c it is ru 2 �y „ N au t on o .o a °' a (U X 3 0 o f I t6 �j' E O '� L t6 N L L LL > t6 c6 c i �U/'�/'/1 i✓f i9}P@y f O m t6 V i w i N Dn V N E V u. aW o � N O t a 0 X N i i +' h a t6 V iio� rh ✓i` G H tt 3 �' t`t i� 3 ° a aU a to .E a t :E N N U N N N c N L V w Dn c O c '� L .� L N o 0 a N p .E O 3 N c V ° ° '� Q 0 0 N � > O v�i t O ro a+ +, O N 4- L i c ro •� 0 a..i W;..� N N N E W a tO V N p on O N N p N } L N N a o C w L N _ N a 3 ° 4- c _ on tt is 3 in c N N o o 0 ° > � � � o L Ntt c I U .(U a . c c � E E ( au E +� E E (U � ° >. +� Q tt on to V; 2 ro '� N > i N w O w N a ° N �, " m S .- a °c 4; 0 4- 0 0 ton t E�a ro V F N „ 3 on c tt V c +� E N N N o a o on on 0 o aU > t6 c Vf N V E N V N J-u V O V 0 0 w N wt6 i E i O N N V O �������, I.,.i..l •i E U N V i •O c c c VI a s tt O N O O_ tt O c N _ N O 0 N i rn C.) �-!.-! a LLJC a X on c E 7 �, tt t6 O O t6 c "O N a N -p V, +�+ W J O N D on p E N y V N N .� > t6 Q O c �' �, 0 i ,� �- rr) t6 '-' w c i N i N L t6 N N t6 W C) .t' Dn V, c 'N N E c 1 1 Dn Dn t%f V V N i i L In c °' .� � N O V V L N Dn n % � O tt � to ° � � ° � � � 3 � � � � to Lon o '� a°ni u c>i o o � to a ° U a V > V o V o a to E '� o oo > > o / u hroo H w CE a co N TMI o = o ° o m t •E E Q p 7 ~ � 0o E c E N v°i •° �; ° O ° L E >_ `� E o •o w aai = N u .4-J Q N +� N O V 0 t6 C fla N °- a V +� �' x on a' 0 c C N on V •V ° O +� (UC ,C V N O on o 5 o a Q au a u u m c (U Q a V E _ N -Lu ° Q o c N M > N �l a (U o L O _ (U `� E ° E au o N +� Q �6 O O �O (U Dn V (UI am QO V O (U > 0 o C O N O L W > (UCL W (U 1. � a••i Din 0 (� N f� o c on E Ln E ° � o ° E +� V c ago - N O V a 41 y 0 N O a u a� a w a� 3 m c c U o tt N 4; ro w L -p N O p N C OV w t6 a N 5 co a y e m o a on is E E ca N 'cu '^ i6 Vf C m y °- c i on E E Q E Q a aU m °o (U H N tt ° E " o O E 3 E ° ° �' r- j o ro c c N L ° ro — -o c = c o = C -o V on '� a a V " ° � c E ° c ° y; 4; N o ,- o m a� ( m E O O O � a� o u u O a� E >. O a L � `� a N E au }' Q r� E " c°a 2 c a o c ao°i a N a� c c on L a L u a' O N t +�� i Q N a a' c V 7 ~ o J E m N 4 m ro o c o a E 0 � � O 2 41 N c i s a ' C � E E C^ -o E c ° 0 -o a o o ma ro u w o L O C •N N N N N o L 7 N 4- " on m 7 C `� O E ,�,, m m m O -p c N O N c L i0 t V N E +� L N N N c V i L. > Ou f� aNi CL c E $ o °" � a p ° °" V w m m a > ° O N o ro Q >, a t 2 5 5 m in u a t co o a u in O E N O V �, a on on L _ on Q 4; c o .o E Q L _ m aU O > L Y N 'i O on ro +� on V , w (U V a m c O •� ro ai et o a ° o a�>i c °c N o N O a a L ;� ,c c p l °c a (u w o � ° (U �' m -Q (U >, � `� ro O m p (UOm E o a� � E ttn (U 0 o o aEi c ° o m a m (U , m � � ° E �, � t one � N O .N N o o c = m L N +� o ott °V � O o L w N � N +� •C on + m N N N N ° V E E i 0 o N N C on 7 N n V N N on N " N m V E (D m E c au o f on E ( -o o N ? E cc ro o LU o m u o z c w (U a ' on u o .� V u o E ro > tt ( c O +� > c > >, a E a N o on "0 . N V r .z: O O c C 7 �r? I""I D!I L _ (U �_ (u :E f6 V QLLJ m 3 ° °U ro o o m N ° 10 o .o i6 c V O = 0 N ma c N +� ._ o c a� -o 'n on on O E +� c o c +� m V m m Q O Q o o N m a� ° m >a o a� L N rott Irra� ��������, m a o H V a m Q E ° E a) N TMI 0 O 0 cn C ~ Y > a o N •C CC L x •C 0 fli L N V C C +(U 2 N Q � u a on 0 O Nn s_ ca c o •c > V °' 3 m E U (6 V C c6 ^ E O !EU) L U Q •E O 0 N E +' 2 N N O C +� - c Dn ca > o c C y O a..i a..i V CN fC6 4- C O .� c � = ( N C i N N N N a C 7 N O a..i i Q Q Q � .O Q L 0 V E -2 0 L (6 i a Dn fn � C V — � C 0 C N C co O C � C (6 C Q m � c E N o c 0 y--' 0 a c on Cr, co Ouaroro T V VO tt > NU N Vf :E ILL. am W O 0t CC matt 2 OO coaN V fn Q ('7 lllll��uum�lllllk� Ill�llll�llllllmllllmllllllmlll�ml i-',Y Ip � �illillillillillillillillililizillillilliillI 4 w u 4. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � �� " ��� � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,", w {� r uuuuuuuuuuu°°°°°°°°°°lu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum �� fi` �I` IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �, �"� r M t5 j1 (IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � �* ��� { k ' i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII X, � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII y4 � { ".� Si 4 w IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � IIIII +� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � t mu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu ': uuuuu uuuuuu � uuuumuuuum 'C" 15 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Y 1V f, � IIIIIIIIIIIII ` /, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ns IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII� _ I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu ! �w uuuumuuu mu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu — uuuuuum �W WI a- J (f) LU W W a C LLI q!(((((((f71 �! 0 M TMI ��W m�uuwuuwum " II��„iyw 0 0 i IVuuu ,� uuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuu uu°�� ipipipipipii,i,i,gi, � t i Ileum Al C) NT co t '0 >+ X N 0 on+n (t E o ,x O N V w E N N .N N v � V C +� N i N N 7 O o OV "p N N OV °V 0 ;� a c6 N m ❑.Ona jN ° Sa p t c6 "06 o o2 t6 EQ � o c ro E ro u aui on aEi o �> c 0 c ro t 3 ° c a o N �' own c +� � c o- ro . o c c ro w Z —,u, w +V+ o N E N 0 O m y N N O +� N t6 on a a o E ' ca n 0 •0 V •O 7 N y `� (N6 m o N E N E E O o > Q N N O C N — ° i, L" o N -0 mu C w M O f6 C O Dn E 7 Z rco x x V N Z "0 f6 •C_ C N N �, E O r o o N rn cmma,. rtzs cn Q N c6 Dn 00 N N �+ i O c w N +� E N N N a ro ma >. o W aui ° o w E ° N ° o •c N t N N i i V on J c c a � N f6 V E _ i V +� a..i (6 aV+ aV+ +=+ "C t6 j a ® H C N a "0 N O tV6 o f N w O o N C N c t w i o 4 +� t6 V V U U +� N o "0 t6 H a u N N N N V "0 o N +V+ O 0 -p O O N .� t +� E N ^ 0 _ V C o p t O i V t t6 0 N N N E N H V N 7 t m ~ o c E ~ _ + Dn c o f u •� a' w a V ° l N Ew aU u a a N ° a�i ro o w N o S a� o �' on c ° t a� u a w u o E o o c o N c c °� ° t o t '� z - - a t 0 (u a N 0 $ .� o Zu O a 0 t 3 N c N p a t m � N c N N N N V V N O n w +� tt N o E a� au o .S a� t ro o f °� > ro o 46 c a� a�i E .0 a s o o o a o ° a °� a a� 0 A E N 3 Lu u ro o w `� a� au aou X t `� t a `� a� a aU a) c t p o t N a� a� �, N ? +� a c E H cj um���� t C w N j N N C N > o O �O N �' y N y r- V o N N o w N p++ �....... .ct. GL N i d C y •^ (6 C N cn �, ,,,,,,, E -o H w , E 0 •E c c o u -o r w on on -° ro o O U w V f6 _ w i -p 4-; o Dn 7 -p t6 _N � C +� C a au .cZ., o C N '� .�, w t �' 0 d •C N t 3 N -°C a a Mo w n (n 3 3 N O c 7 V t N c N �' �' ° o E �' Oa +U E a _ v o� � c E a o c o o c o w J E o ° N t o E E N E .� a a to o a c (U rElla� c o a) o t 2 a� E aU °0 0 0 tea t w 0 0 lrea,� ��� �......... a +� o w u a H w to H to u TMI TMM ID N Ilmnmi Y_ O 0 IIIIIII" On w c un m O (U N L... �, v o O , O m N N ? O NT 4— O LO mo � m a ulVuuuuu ���.� m� cl� IIIIIIIIIIIIIV ��, �- � � v uIIIIII �ijJ O r/�, ' o LD ullu j1 Ln (IIIIIIIIIIII Ill lui%IIIIIII o I�iii� ;_, (IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII 3 0un tt Q cn " 2 'M UiU ��IIII N (IIIIIII A... on J O L cu 3 •= >1 ~ _ c V) LU �, III ...„q M O f6 �n ..... 0 C L �W W W N ...� .. Q U IYiiii6� y... C, cn ........�� L..�....� .......... LLj :z:: IIIIIIIIIIII ///II'rrrrr/j�I� N M TMI y OS)ir N III+ lllill II � c o c o N L �° on x 3 �° x c v 'S a) N 5 o n n04 t c s o o t o 0 0 u a o t /r � N C C C C C C C C Q 00 co �IVuum°op �"IIII Q Q °IIIIuuuIIIIV g�� �'. v � Q Q 0 a D D 7 7 's � �j IIIIIIIIII N N 15 y� ? i t t N LL LfI x l0 „ �f Ills N r[1 L[1 .p N N M M � lllluIIII � IIII lllllllll � �����I uu UI 0 I� �IYiiiid � on N IIIIIIIIIIII N � 0 � v} II.. '� „,.. .... uu Y - Iliiiiii^I a� lµ 0o � Illlllll �� � ro n J > ca �m 3 o U (u LLJ yu° N U NV LLJ ' IT, ( . .......,M.. N Q j IIII�IW Ln • .. U H U LLJ N on 0 In /+/II'rrrrr/j�I� M M TMI CV) v fi y v .......... r h l V �i1q, .- -O v �, z "fir r p '� n / u Y r 1ii , f a r g I f 4j Q dlVl J f J I .. O d'Al r 4- m a • �E � O "N OU r > co ... ol of �a�m w s ...... r l0 N > c^�6 O N N N o °' L N ate' c •? 0 3 a�i a�i X N +' ro +� +� N N �° p O a +� N � t O •V f6 � � N f6 N C E N pp N O2 U �' a i6 "O +' (IOUN V "0 o u° a�i o u° o �� 0 3 a� N ro 5 N ° ro o N D!I N x �.���y m > U N N +�+ N O� a N y t N O O Y O i � �' ° C x O N � Q a Nu -" U Y N +� T O ,� Nu "' ca O a •N on b 0- V c t ca a.. f o > a� c ro _ V �' p O N c N a O Q ' c O w N w a�LU E �, 3 a V w +� > ro N c7 N a 3 axi E c 3 O c ro ou ro �:...M . �au o ; ca W M(r) opo w w O Q oon (u N O - DA VLn f6 LLJ ro ci^ � N O N °O V � U 00 m ° N Q -° c f6 n Vo O a + u N V t o } 3 L o ..., .. qq M TMI N y W r v'YY nun yun. N n nil N y ° 3 um�u N y on w c `o Iliil m „�� VI N .U.Y _ O "�mNN N -2 - L i, a v o on CDT 0- 0- U U t 4- 0 O C C C C C 00 00 C7 ��VuII r'I r,;l, ulu N N IIIIIIIIIV Y, U O °''llllll 1,7 o N CC� N UIIIIIIIIII 12 00 IIII��� IiilNll � � LO m t IIII„ nnnn :,,. IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIII ullllllllllll 'l!�!I!II�! 'I����� � mllllll Ill �nnnnM 06 U O Vim}^ LLMIIII�l IIIIITT � � IIIIIIIIIIIII +' O n 7 Dn � co co 0on m,,~'"'"',, c10 4Yiii6 a 3 n N O C Y n �3"q "0 > O : L 0 ma (U z L .... r0I oI �ll/llil`rtr, M TMI J% ry y N oo/o, w w I N N c _ c IIIIIIII y O " O N I IIII M�� � Y � N N N (0 N j 0 j y. N m "ix `p � v C i •f0 O C „ ww� •(0 2 •!2 E U1 E t E lim on (a N � d � d O on Y Y Y c =3 c c c c c 0000 C7 m ullVuumll %��� � j N IIIIIIIIIIII "� " m � 1 � � N 0 � O 0 cr N n „ > Z E m in N t > 3 O N II Z 41 b � uIIIIII .'p,„ U WWI �� IIIIIIIIIIII � N N N � IIIII II I��IIIIIII�II I'iIIIIIIIIIIIIIw IiIIIIiIIIIiIlillil' IIIIIIIIIIIIII O N m � ° a H 0 v� :M LL o I Sul' �_ IIIIIIIIIIIIII > L m 3 c ca 0 ) i � L //IIIf�l cfl M TMI m u n _ 3 0 ` o n m � ✓. ' ' �.��� ^ o o � o a m m C 0 UE U C 0 T O 1 6 m v S E v x U o x U U i a+ U1 5 �n �n 01 VI N y," y L L U L U a2 °n .i v ° N a N U t a t N U a U s a 0- C) 9 v v O c � c c c c � c c c c c c = — - - — — - - - - - - C) ✓�r �✓!/A✓j(.11,� ��� ,,, " ,,. � /�'� �r/l '�l":... II III y co N N „� NLn0 on L 0 m w in H D li v v v N , v N N N t t t t t n. Q w I I n III LCI n W O� O ullluuum � � '��I 'lllliiiii� °luuuuuu6 a°" a � II'llllll N � a L4 o o 6 uiiululllllllol IIIIIII„III IIII �I�illlllllllllllw }? � Iliiiilllllll� 11111,��6 I qq � c J kliiii I uul .`z I IIII Illl iiiiiim m IIII _LU L' HI v m ,II161' LU W L N m > cn LU (s) ti M TMI IG r ��� II�IIIIIII p IIIII Id�ul��� .J�� Iry III IIII Y � � � Y Y � � I �m �IIII 3 c c 3 on c 3 3 c N o_n kol O .b" 0 � O N o_" o �n o V o O o u ° Y C C d Y C U C C U C U (0 y � � (0 (0 a) O U (0 t0 3 r� m - v U n v m U -a o — v n n — v a N N U1 N 7 7 N U1 7 U1 N o U o o U o v v N v v CD co io m o .Co io .co co io .( 'co io w v v v v, a) v a s C c c c � c � c c 62cr c O r c co `^ v on ° c �l m c m 0 c v 0 vUi � p U li vUi H ,w c m c c c c N O � N O O O O y N om E E E E in in in in in IIII �- ,rn,�, r IIIIIIIIIIIII LM y N IIIIIIII L a � iI'i IIIII a .a � � E � IIIIIIIIIIIII (U c 3 o u° O o a u... ..... uuuuulllo M O 0 N 0. U Z Z cn LL. IIIIIIIulllllllllllllllllll a, (U a � Bill N $ LLJ LLJ N Vl 'N :z. i . .q �C ..., O N � � IIII flyy,r°f e�/ll/l/li/,r, co M TMI 0 i �� IIIIII N Y U 0,00 0 C U O o 3 0 X U _ N v r O C �m 4 �p O N � O �eA( O 'ff `o c c bD bD N i C >_ •� Y In In lu AJ C ro7r 2 9 r, O � U1 S 41 41 6, .m / m.��� in Y L U - ° U s un�U ;; v ° � E a1a E a1a m ° n U t o o _ _ m o m U VI In In In In n9! LLJ C 12 C C C C C 04 co 00,00 0010, " i m v vi Y LA A n Q In U Y U III IIII Y 11.1 V1 D VI \ \ \ Y Y Y In In In I Q Q Q t a N V) N IIIIIIII I'Yiiil ""� � U � uIIIIIVIOI C � a w 3 w ro Mi ° WE N 3 V E U N Q •N NO N Q a O C f6 ..m.......M 0 V)a������� C a y C U C C �"'"'" uml E Y E 10 10 N 00 O O > N U a1 7 � 7 7 >_ N U1 U 7 . `A.. „. � U s U U U a � o- U IIIIII � �I m m m m m m m m m • • • • 1� Y Y Y �"� C C C C C C CR C C min — � a m III IIIIII Y J C u N � JIlm 'IIIIIIIIIII N N C L Ln ro m rr1 n N ���um "III"IIII" N w �#q j N .O v v U W N Y Q t6 N I�� U U c U �....... -.t: GL LU LU LU L (r) ti°! f l�l ...:: IL. IIIIIIIIIIIII a) M TMI 1 ,�f S, IIIIIII Y � 3 O O a J J o N v m ;ron C c c l V � mliiiil U (0 (0 (0 ,E 0 4 m N N N w r nI s c a a v v -a VI p o O (0 m 3 m m u +� 4- c c ( c c Q c c p v, (Y)�/ f (Y) `„ ON[ lS/ �E y U U ulllluuull O 7 7 Z 0 Z d/0" N N N N ullll I � � ��� gi t t t t IIII . F EIi {p"JAY �C UV1U1 4 U1� /� III 'mml' M M M M M T o IIIIIIIIII �luw � ate'' I'I"IIII 7 on i Q on E u c Sul' +.i LM C �: +� Q � V 0 ... . IIPIIII� m a� o ICI co o �1;8u6 �0 � co on ... Q a L W N , N m IIIIIII : „q MLU N N O N J N J J J o Ln ^ I�'iilii W W C� (S //IIIf�l 0 M on L L on L L III C C IAl O O C U + C m Y O N m N U > U m E Y N Y U a _ N Y U 0 N U1 i0 m E C > m ° L a > m o v 3 v 3 m 20 O o v 3 m in r .0 C V U N N U1 �+ O 'U C U N L m a O C JO N 2 on CIO CIO IIIVVI N y O > y •_ O_v v C C C Z N ++ y •� y v -C _ _ ° y y IIV C N in .� N N •C L N N L 3 U1 V .0 N L N f�0 m L L N 7 N N �..� y Y a'O m m JO Y a JO .� U 'O 'O a fC0 Y fV0 N Y V Y a N m w v E m E a; on v m E `m m m y v E on v N y m ° m v m E m y o v aw E v .� N E v •� — 3 E -`o U on v U a .� E c � 3 a " 3 U 0- 7 fA -O C 7 11 E -O N � N C -0 LDI1 p y0 y O 7 _O -O a NO � O_ C •u� •3 O C L L y O L fa0 O_ N a N L H L 7 N U1 m m O 'O 7 U1 C m �1 N N a N U U L U U 0- U 0- 0- U U +' U 0_ N L U L a U K U J U U V V N L a J V N m C -o -o J U L C m m m m m m m 7 V — m m m m m m O •j m m m 7 U m m 75 m 75 m m m m m m 75 U C a C C C C C C � 0- 0) C C C C C C 0 d N U E a C C � 0- C C C O C C C C C C - a C C N O m m > Q 4O 2 Q N p'> 00 > > > > > 00 m y U m m O') _ N mN U1 'O co O _U > O > O N N \ > > > m Z Om z O O O _j 00 00 00 \ � v v 0 y v v v ? �n z z N 3 N >' ? onN N N N n N \ \ U O O O N N O O O 7 K N V u O K K K li li 00 l!1 I� N 0 z Y K 2 VI VI VI „u'•' nmm N M 10 W 01 N M I, W 01 O (IIIIIIIIIIII 4, r , jvYa N IIIII N< III Iglu E UI����uuopl d a--� (V '..... Cu � O „n Cu �„ Ulllllilili� z v lolllll rur�� (� Illllllliiiiiill� <, i �,� ,��, � J 4uu�n lii � un illlll6il LLJ LU W LLJLLLjLBIn mro to Cu it O IIIIIIIIIIII n za LLJ I m r%% CV) on t on t on nm Nmnu�umV vi ai w v w v N N ru ru g olj%dill N 3 m N 3 m v m 3 3 L L o °p y' U N U N Y U J N N v u� O O OD °un O WI (0 O O 01 - O I,�^n1 rJ U w U w N U U L vi 5 on d U d E y E U E L L L N i� •C .> i� 2 U fU fU � 1 •� •� L L v L L t t u N S a� O U bfI O bfI U (0 L d U L d U U U (0 a L 0- U U t iAt _ U U L U "w 7 O t0 (a7 O t0 c c0 10 c0 7 O t0 10 c0 c0 c0 10 Call O v 2 LID L V M Q co IIIIIIIIII Q Q L � T v O � Q v � 0 v a all m s \ bD U U 2 n LU v ss � y M LO 10 I� ��� iy I ��"` IIIIIIIIIIIII Ln kn 10 � LA Q y mom, .N 3 3 M N (IIIIIIII%iu II U N C «III' �luul 3 ° D � LM IIIIIIIIII _ J L a m c v o v m +' 3 .o L 3 m U � U U Loll v O IIIIIIIIII 11111 N _ IIII U1 C O b1I +' U L L. �...�M Hs 0 00 U1 L O- w O L. L c 7 I. U I uuullllllll a un v v m E v E on •° m .. M c 0 c 0 3 u N N 5 2 c u� n � n E Lo s v m 3 a� o U Z 3 O ululllllll i w Q` IIIII u 7 WI O O L 7 U d • u U L 0- (a U U 0- U U L 0- 0 IIII' .IIIII U J J = U IIIIIIIIIIIIIII u m m v pN III all Q or c N v IDS)0 y a IIIIIPIIiii `^L° � d I U ° D H m > > -a O a; v 0 m o v p y W _ all 0 .� a..i 'ul,,,. L Q �q N s p o0 LU p,", on 00 > N li��'llii° U Z N (0 'O 3on uO �' t a N v am*r+i r ' N li� N N O U N I....... ..'.t, ' a..� I'I�ulllll N i L U O N LU W _ LU -0 .. J L •� .0 Illliliull�� � %IIINoo > oo -3 a v vI ((I o( 0 N M o on (Lu ° > Dn C V .0 N L W C fa k;N N !e C C V V C O C O N a E w O C N C a) f6 a) C E a) V n5 o +� �a O a) O O , +� N C::. .�. N O >, •E of 7 O V O i a U fa i fa C V N fO w 7 N 3 .e...a ..C,"�I N on on +� +P o ro ro 3 on p 0 N V C t OV V p V i +� fa N w al O (a C i N o E s w w a O am a 0 � N C C O m a) 'E ~ ru V N (U N a) S!J � c 3 a� a°i ° o E �' a or O N ca �' N +�+ ro ro y k�N O O . N a -a cn 'I ov m N N C N V c tt it N N o r,� E a� a 'a -o o ° 'o ' c U a� on N C ° 5 a ra N O o o N C N ro a on - p E c rc�; � a t o ro a ro C o Ct N t6 t6 N k;� al on O C E o o (U � •E C rc"t o = C .V C .� N Y N ° ' V C ° O M Dn N a) u ++ O V + ° a' +� co c N c E C _0 C m .0 i o S t, r � � (U w x � on 6.., r- V (a 0 _ _ .� V a. r . C >, on (a O on $ N V w u a; t a� c r 3 E a N N -O +� N a m CL O ca 'm 9 am' ° ° o �5 (U tt ° � c •� W an E 0 a V 5, o c a m e a ,, E o ! t C ca ru N ca (u •E � o E tt � .. tt Vo �' c E N O a 11 i u o .X -o V E c�a c °- ° °" c 3 t r� N (utt C 0 E a (6 w •0 +� (6 i C +� m "0 ° N N > O O 11 O i C N ° 'i,q �, (U +� i f6 +�+ N E C O •N tt -0 p plf � N t � t N "o o t � J ✓ ! N to t° ... N � w tt tt t Ln t C C ° N +� V _ /ice• f �Y -a a) o a) N m t (U C •t6 (U 7 N 0 O it N Con ", N (U u .� C � V � f6 � t 'a N .V .0 E au a ca a a3i o ° 0 3 a %, l III V w a � at � Z � w —°�" O o � -a o cu aU N o a' �} r c a) to o c D!I N �` N✓ ca E (u is r- o E � (5 3 v N >, 0 c � 0 -0 c�6 > ° N — .- (u C B = ca C a ro f%1j 11 Ln > c •V '� E aai ° w 'a� a� �' (U O t C N C a i C t � ',J C E - ow C of a) i O %lJ %IAl H 0 .E -0 C N a ° ° c 7 V a) o C o a o +� a� o u C o ca ;� ca (u z a� 3 t W c = on �lr o N N c o O N ^r E a N )10 ( c E + (Ni ° o I� i� �6 aj V 7 N +�+ d a� tN6 N VOf N O /a u u i on a al N w r i w C N N a) f6 V .v m �� ce o a�i ' a�i ° ° it cat a� � a� c o 0 1� i o C �6 � a o � o N E 3 c V - .o C C n J%� /if%a i G a..i a 0 N 0 ca +C ca 0 N j 4 E o row a ° o �_ ° t10 ° on _ .. > a ira ii /r ` 1 +�+ C C �a ° Ql "0 fa C N . •�6 C N m fj Wry(J O U tt E °" O o c E ca /�j/ � 1 � on V N N �' � � � r— qU �lG liJ N c c = -0 a) t 'N is 0 t W .� V i V m >, (6 V V a H N a U o -a tt -a - a E M M O cu -o DA O +� p Vj N �+ 0 � o u° > °�' a o N aw °c c E w cn 0 o � N O c N ? >+ S N N 0 Dn O N N f6 N 0O � YOro (u y _ O i f6 Dn C m N +� f6 F U o a V) ro > - t6 V o i mom a� m o 0 > N �, a o a„- 3 a� o � aU � ca � � +� aai o E � �' > E c u o U M *' o c a c o Q ro a 0 ro 3 u N 0 ro a � E N c u t t (U N __ +� V - o on N 3 > ro on N •` p 0 w t O p Z S +� ° t •V N N In 2 '^ > Y t6 0 a� o °� c O O 3 �' .r- t6 au z �' p 3 a s N on O O 'D kr�o °c N o a c V c 5 Vi N o ° a N o 0 3 o n 3 E > o °C V' � (u cn +� w 2 C +� 3 U c to `` m o t V N N M V o O > V *� f6 .� w C Y , �.... 0 Y N N O ° C w J N o C E ca o C C N V N O c i O ro O N t�6 N N O a 3 M o a N a w C a� E ro a� m o 2 N N o • N .� +� C M N C "y 7 C "O � C O 3 o a� O V' E on ro a o O o ro NT E u ro .a m in ro N a t V �,,,,p co a� > V N o 0 = ... Y 3 V o a� _ > +, 3 oLL. NE >, �_ O "o ,v p N c N `� p 'o c ro w i �- +� N o o N tt o O C i N N C i t6 O tt C 7 +� c6 p 0- N C u'I "p ^" t6 on I� ,� a t6 � to to w Q Mo H t H z rn co 0 C t O V N Cvi N o +' 7 i �' N N O d C c6 +� �������������, '�>^, C V cC6 N - _ V O 0 7 H V 72 t6 .� O •� t w C O O i N V N o a c N N O V E a p ro V ro _ 3 ,� a `7 aU pn w N N _ C J ��> N Q .� a > to N C p "• .r, N t6 -O C N N tt - 0 .� C +� tt t6 t�6 �' V �' �+ o "O C i >' �O on u t�6 V ', (U In a O O Vf i t6 C •> N C +� o Q 3 N V 'C ...4- 0 � N �pO E a �, p t p E ate, -o C �` 3 t„ "am N w ...III...... ...� > a L t6 O N +N.i N p ° N Q H '� _ > O a a V ++ um oE on tt ° au to �' v ro o w > an a E o r\ a� on 0 �; c o Q au o t6 p t Q Q i u N V O O p .�"',',',,',',; O +�.i .N 0 7 C C t6 t "0 N >, C C N �3 a ����������� M N `F p C tt .IV N � N Oa N .O O V o o p O `- +� N t N H N w e w +� N on o +�+ N O p to N 0 j V 0 to Q Mo o 0 0 a >' 3 a�i U ... p _ y on a s t6 - a� N a N .� �6 .N E on E t6 " E on .E � c - ° (u t (U ro �" a�i N (u i luau iuu tN uuui iiu A u ro o ~ c o N , H row N H o ° 'tt H a .a w a E a� E o r- u o w o a; .on O (U E i6 E V _ O _ N U w E V 0 > c V >+ Dn N O O +>'i i �' "O "0 �' C N a Mo V, O O V i + N i V N O O +� i > ro o c o '3 o ro o � u V' E o > a� > tt ° aU o a ° CM O CO E ° tea tE (uo > Mo o > u > N 'S V C ++ N V1 p 3 N O "0 N O N C V 3 N +� N >+ 3 V _ aam S t6 N -moo p O •� j N N t6 t6 N p Mo > ° O N tt t c V 7 E O tt 3 on N O N q�':,��" a .� V t t6 _ _ ro O c O V t6 N > i_ vi O > c a N N N N t6 t "0 N O o E t6 N III O E y > � •5 20 LLJu.. Q V DA a..i t6 a..i t +Ln ° t ....� tt t6 on O D• N LLJ E > N F U o o .on c u a� i a°i on E _ � o a� a� t E �' c a� N +� +' N V a t V .. N t6 O C i +�+ V .o E `� 7 i 7 N f6 O C a� a, � � a N a� 3 0 U am > O �, t t6 O N +�+ N ��i" U N -p N N t6 V O L w ...0 on 3 c � ro o N o a ° V 0 on 00 cr) .�...� d;;;14 N C .� 0 , C C O O N +�.� ( N N N au U --- z: a_ "O t6 O V ro LLJ C N N C t O _ 3 .:'...: a N V O f6 f6 C t6 t6 3 N i C C N C y... is i:n +� O 0 7 0 +� w V N N N a N C N > t6 t O +� i N on on N >+ i ++ f6 +� a� a V a, E �_ y N `� o o a V an o ,, � a� � c6 a � � a, � N a (U a� a� ;,, ✓ aU a a� ns Q ° a to 0 0 0 > > � ED � > N 9 � 0 3 � ������������� � � o aXi E o o � o qq M �O M V) N t C N V N V t to LL. p 7 ++ N N O C, to N C :5 (uC O C •N , aT+ (U L V) 1 C a M "p m N to 01) DA C Y N N y Dn L t N a O N E to > to N 0 .o O +' a c c O a + v_ c C o°�n y N w e io a r o a o N 3 c •a I o •° _ 3 (U o O L o a E Ec °' o v a U -o a-i c ° o on (U (U t 3 a� > C to .o tb +� 7 c6 c6 'u on Vf to 7 `� �, O w •5 O C .o N N i p, >+ C N N ,� to t C O N O N N +� > N N N N Vf on p i -p o N N C E c (U •3 E V, a " _ L }' � a i (U a p is V_ o o c o o 00 0 c c V N c c o t —0 o u o t`o a�i a� a L .� tt a •o a N `� ro V ro o " a V o � o c ca N C N a E co DA V �' p y Y 0 > Y 0 C N 0 3 t t o o L +� N c L N C p u u ro ro o c o ro L C +� C = ? = 0 ^ OV ca N ° ._ ca N > 'V C00 a a oa E c t Q c 7 - N O L c O O .� > N O V O O N >, 'p N Dn VI p V "0 a V V t6 t -p C w t6 C +� co c Q N 0 y M a e r {I V V V Lf I p a N D t C 3 N a' t ro -o 00 a E ro � O . " t. O O O .... O C "i.. u Vf o L N N x c rn a ��, ro o LLon $ 3 X tt 3 (." f!a (o >+ w N riA�) L '� +�.i m `' E on >+ +�.i V �' E N V tt a� E +' tt E c +� O N E z kN C N Z ` o a L V +� N N V L V t N k!a r# O E o C N DA Vl a L i E 3 i 0 0 c6 V f6 011 C ��� on E L o "" o N r c E E L o a L c �? a ° o o N a 0 a " L E a(U Eu p a a o p o -o L Q �° o V o ~ c c ro ro to E N LU E v > N o0 w ° tt C k'�a " r t6 c N O E s O N C � 'E 7 O tU E c O 0 a ,� c 5 a ro o E a > `Q' > u o L J N to +� o a o N 3 o N N — c E c aU O to 0 0 3 C t -0 N ca V o O O Ln L V e.." �+ U y p V N O 3 0 0 c to 4J E a w t/) .r L w "0 a +� t6 �, ut N 7 '^ E on t6 7 O O U w '� j O V Oop V V o 0 0 0 ° a� `� aEi 3 u E a ° a� N ca o w o > c L L Q 0 _ L •� t„ on 0 E to V E t N p K'7 Y > t >, k O '� a N w " N E V tU S!, .� +� V 4- Q V V .... v ° '� a�i c O L a a c o to a o u to a� o �; Z c c L " •Q L N O O N ` °°3.. t N N p � w V Cci �" w 4J OL N on -p y ;,o.:= is li C7 H a w w a C7 H V on o R��, „� ��������, U H w a m a '� to N t N (U c N N a..i "0o (U In O �," V O a..i p VI � •N O C t6 Ln .e..., x ,� y V '+'::: L O 0 m C 46 7 "0 4- 'r'^. (U (Uo 7 C (UC C:" 0 m (u .0 on 0 f6 N Q x,;l a O C V N Z tO N N O to N C f6 r:°'# O E -� -p "q i+ O -0 a ' C t6 7 U L Vf on 'v, C C "0 L N C >, "R„N to a s V +N.� O C 0- V •C Q) .d°.;�° N -p N C N a a N 4`4 V a N O N O COk�����'N i C i N .� i✓^� Q N L +� N t t6 t 7 C C N .i"�a.�, C +, w +N.i Dn t E t6 +� E � V_ t6 E t6 P:;J" ,m,,,,, 0 a t6 L .".,,,,, y � C C y C C V ;, ,, a ut m C w c H J 7 Q L N o > ttl w L C +' N O N +� C ut L N > C O +� O C a. p V f �, N O Vi p N ++ y, > E > Vf N a 7 a .0 N „k�����,� �{I) i 'S ()J) t6 +; a..i E 0 0 C N C O j o j to E ++ c to ������ ��� to o c E t tt u .c a +� 2 c °n c W O C G> >+ � w C ,,:. {�� O O N N a' N w 7 f'D N on C E o°n O .o C.� W a o m 44 _ Ln > - O (u mo c o L N o n O 3 on c a� c > V c w t E 4mmu o t �' t�i c a� _ `" '", O O L O O a, O L .� c ° so_o E ° H N c +� 3 0 0 +� N w E u +� $ c o o �...5. a..i T f6 a..i tO a L p C V C L •c tO C N N L i 3 a o Q Q c v o E > o E ,... tra on o L a- w m tLo to Vf m :II. m C V w m.., u C N t L �' cn N E a'' td E O a -p tt a'' > V S E V 7 w N Vf r✓" LO E > N N to � i (U c of c i on o t6 o V a " }, c to o c +� c o ro o o a� ro "' t a� O o a ro o :on o r c to a� a aci tco p V C r" o f N c '. /'aa� a to a LL d H OL a 2 H a Ln to +� L� N Q t6 S,.a IIII CV)O O O O O O p o 0 o r O O O Q; O LO O 0 a UT N Dn fR C N 3 0 0 0 O muu,„ O O O O M O J N L L Q 00 On N H O O O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 VI N L[1 O O L[1 O N Lf1 lf1 N V} lf1 81, Y N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U E 0 0 Loo rn o 0 4- N v� v� v� 0 0 O yr yr O) a` cY) >, O O O O O O .o O O c - O O O O O O v O O O o O O O O rn O O in O o in O in in O O V) O r14 rn V) — v O 0 yr N yr yr _ r • a yr yr yr N +' O L D11 � O O O O O O v O V "' O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ n O_ X "Y'" O L[1 O O O O N O f0 W ^ O L[1 O O Cl lo N C V} V} O N - O M N Or N V} r4 V} to E 0 N L a IV " " L 0 (U c i E a -� t d on o - N 3 C O- H o v N a i o v bn ` > c E N V _ v > J y C bI V +� v v o a3i Y E m > .>_ �_ 2 v p o � o m a vOi E Z � m O L N U m N N U cp " a.i L � Y O y O- a `n ^ (D ^ 0 ° v � me � o m Q � 3 � ° o 'a o `oEm � o v y v Q v o un o s c u In m y c, c, N E t ° u S v 'o Q a a a m u m� co m u Ln U_� � n 2 u w � a a f6 E V - V � f6 w E •� N V }' N X ° a r- C N �n O N f6 N "O C i U 7 (6 a o 0 ca C ° °a0roi YwfaN>6 .N> co m it V 0 I O au aU t6 V NN N O NN > N V C 0 f6 a � 3 V o N _0 a it a° c 0 Uo (U Ero o an -o u� E 6a� ro O N oou N N u y + °a E 7 c6 0 c N .E�. N i F E ro (UO C Vtt 6 O > f6 i a E -0w C ,� _ C C O J ro > N 3 >In Q) O a� on ° ro .N o co 3 c l� N ro ° V V �������� o o o c c c c N ����� c ` o t 3 �' O a 3 a a o ro 70/0 $ on m • > -0 V � � E -°p `� o -0 ca ca co IIII M III � m 0 o N N Q IIIIII � O N 50 L Q d O ~ z T o (0 N �n bI v ca O �o (a v , I O O O N U O_ (p O04 U Q mu uuu Q U C7 0_ Q O IIIIIIII O co N in mIIIIII � wm � � to" 0 a a E a O _12N o y IIII 3 0 > T v O O = p VI %i C a O C N T ' O Gi IIII C 4d O O � U w L O v N mu IIIIII � .O � j bfI � U 4 Lncu ij 00 co IIII O 00 c U U N Q U co E O I- U O W.`_ cu O i a-i CL co N � a)000 U) O O C i T N � > O E 4dU T 2 C13 U U OS) U d c o Q C 0 U (u H N E O w N O III C O > N co C C N O OU 'O O- IIII „o a) w O O N E IIIIII � N 0 on U N N LL N LL O E N Q N C y - O cr) (0 �n N U ti N O W O i y > 0 a_ > U y O a) .O O Uy0 i C w E (0 �n on �....... ..'.t. GL �n v i N C Q •N a.i (r) w .o O •" C i W W i:i ;... (r) v on v 3 m on L ( ~ o w r,. -.z, a a c v _ a a) on c_ un a) o +! v z II"� IIIIII o a o cu E v o � u o ° o o J v o 0 m v m c v m y U U w E H v �^ L O N > d (0 N C C v •� '� •� W on Q Q a U U U Y v v on on y, L Q Q m U U oo a vi N in in in in H H H H H a H Q U ti M c � 0 on ro c p Q a w ° x i 0 i i c a) 0 ro c p u a) c u V o '5 u o o ca o uulll„„. o E o o +.� O Q) i w +� N 4- > c t 0 c U ro O O U Li w e w E 'O N 0 > O 0 c 0 Ln ro N c6 o ro - V) w is x � V V V O y � N ui'u 3 C N co co Es V N c 0 Q) Q 0 t 0o w C2 ct� ::E cn 0- 0- 3 cn a IIIII 1°I m i6 i6 c N 0 0 N N O O on on 0 CCO L L N N N a"i a N a O ra N � c VC EN Ear u w O f6 f6 7 7 i i O O O O O U N c- c- c- c- Uc � � n Ucn w � c a � 4- v�i ° o c ° N 0 Q V 0 u 0 c � -0 a c ro 4- 0 U w E ) 0 a) ° Q) o cva o > a E ro u c ono � +� "' 00 o > 3 U o �; x a °o0 0 ° ro U t ) co a on d a"i N •c �' N N V c c Ud a u V)i = ° a °V a � a) t on III � ch E 0 0 c E H = ULnn ULnn ULnn ULnn Uc,n w w 0 L on lllllll _ o att N � llllpuuuuuwulll > E N N c6 O Ln O_ 0 i N +�+ O2 Y as °" a (u E E ro N N > 0 � o cn N °- N m uuuuuuuuuuu uu V) ~ w U " ~ a..� E N cd L N � w O N 0 E- (u( uuuuuuu O N •O 'V J 0 ° r G 3 3 ^ c LA a L, a +� N on� c c O N o �, u ro ro w < N _ 0 O O N -O on oOo V a N c . an N mU w ILL. u =) C2 C2 :Ecn o L :z: L E (r) w N w �LLj + N y... �1') C u„����� y on on on on on on rl V'E f(�lr // N ,, o = as as as as 3 3 co M t ° ro t Dn N ° N c N 3 ca O o > 0 0 Q) ° E ca `o c U>, c M N +�+ N i6 t ON E E E ~ O O a N •O 0 U +� +- a' +- _ E u u. E N i " V >, � ro T C Q) O 6 + on "0 •N 3 c N O a� w o a t 7 N = M 0 on Li N V) ^ +' O on c a > o- +� c m V (U N � � 3 m ru .� 0 on � '� � c u O O 5 a � (U c % M c > o > o N a m V m O N ro N c N ro ro O (U �... on o on on N N 0 on •0 on O Ln C IX O ° N N N N O ° H a m a w a 0 o O o V c t o N 2 E! it L..u... L..u... NT ! ro on tz u N C Q) a� o a a) � +� +) uul 3 a "0 N I N i oon 0 c N y O +tz co N c p N E on O O y C N O " C 0 u E i u u .0 O O E N c6 2 V N 7 > .� w N ON E ro C c6 V C c uuuuumu _ cL O E N N O Lf I N N ° w _ aU c aU +� .E N a� a� ro ro N a i I '��^; N O M 'n >, y a (U -gyp C C N ° i V 0N0 a (U ° own c ° :_ 4- �...... 0 ( O N C O O N N O on a„� V c6 N q >_ o 0 (Ui C V ° E LnLn to to c M i on w a a 3 ("A M c u a 4� O _ M c aui M m i'Ilil E i (u o u III cr) � VuIummi�iiiIiIIiIIiIiIiI,IuIIuIIuIIu.V IuII Vuu" 0 U O i • a IIIuumllllluuuuu � p c � U �iL LUwN u ° i 6 `- > O N >_ c (z a ' ~iN N a0 ON N pa ; NN i on _ U •O0 E W V k2M V c M O N 4� Cf(°6 c •� �Ln a U N c >V mc �w C O 0 cn a u a M + U 0 " w N O O 46. w .. %' in IIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII m f6 i6 C 7 ul on on 'YIIII N N N W W U H U M 4— EN N 7 7 iiIIIIVm ,:S%t�ll ,l�l IIII d d d d U N U (n W W N TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FDOT SET-ASIDE PROGRAM (TA) FUNDING APPLICATION A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) [§ 11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 133(h)]. District representatives may be contacted for guidance. PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Applicant Agency Sponsor Type. Select the box indicating the agency of the person who can answer questions about this project proposal. Then complete applicable text fields. Note: State-recognized non-profit agencies may partner with an eligible governmental entity but are not eligible as a direct grant recipient. Checkbox next to each of the following types of agencies that do not indicate text field. Document allows one selection. Local government (e.g., county, city, village, town, etc.). Regional transportation authority or transit agency. Natural resource or public land agency. School district, local education agency, or school (may include any public or nonprofit private school). Projects should benefit the public and not just a private entity. Recognized Tribal Government. Other local or regional governmental entity with oversight responsibility for transportation or recreational trails, consistent with the goals of 23 U.S.C. 133(h). Metropolitan /Transportation Planning Organization /Agency (collectively MPO) (only for urbanized areas with less than 200,000 population). FDOT (only by request of another eligible entity, then enter the requesting entity). If"checked", enter the requesting entity in the space provided. (Word limit 5) 2. Agency name of the applicant. (Word limit 5). City of Key West 3. Agency contact person's name and title. (Word limit 5). Ryan Stachurski - Multimodal Transportation Coordinator 4. Agency contact person's telephone number and email address. (Word limit 5). (305) 809-3867- ryan.stachurski@cityofkeywest-fl.gov 3149 PART 2 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) CERTIFICATION LAP is FDOT's primary mechanism to provide governmental subrecipients with federal funds to develop transportation infrastructure facilities through cost-reimbursement (grant) agreements. This legal instrument (the grant agreement) will describe intergovernmental tasks to be accomplished and the funds to be reimbursed for selected projects. The FDOT Local Programs Manual and FDOT Procedure 525-010-300 provides details for local agencies to complete a certification process that is a risk-based assessment evaluating whether they have sufficient qualifications and abilities "to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work" for infrastructure projects. Non-profit organizations are not eligible for LAP certification, local agencies are not eligible for certification of Project Development and Environment (PD&E) or Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition phases. FDOT is required to provide oversight on fee-simple and less-than-fee ROW acquisition phases, including license agreements, encroachment agreements, perpetual easements, temporary construction easements, and donations. • LAP Full Certification Provide: Approval Date: 7/25/2022 and Expiration Date: 7/24/2025 Responsible Charge Name: Ryan Stachurski LAP Project Specific Certification Provide: Approval Date: Project FM(s) Number: Responsible Charge Name: Not LAP Certified —A LAP Certified Agency will deliver the project on behalf of the uncertified Agency. Provide: Sponsoring Contact Agency Name: Name: Address: Phone: Not LAP Certified - FDOT District will administer the project. Provide: FDOT Contact Name: Phone: Not LAP Certified —the Agency will become LAP certified 1 year prior to the delivery of the LAP project. Not Applicable—this is a Non — Infrastructure Project. 3150 1. Project Name /Title: (Word limit 15). Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan 2. Is this a resubmittal of a previously unfunded project? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the year(s) of submittal(s) and include project title(s), if different, in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 3. Does this project connect a previously funded project(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the Financial Management (FM) number(s) and provide a brief description of the other related FDOT-funded phases that are complete, underway, or in the FDOT 5-year Work Program. (Word limit 5). • Yes No Bike Bed Master Plan - FM 438687-1-18-01. 4. Is funding requested for this same project from another source administered by FDOT? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate funding source(s) / application(s) submitted. NOTE: Contact your district representative to discuss if this same project is partially funded in the 5-year Work Program or if FDOT has received another application for funding it. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 5. What are you proposing in this application? In 200 words or less, provide a description of the project and what it will accomplish. The description should allow a person without prior knowledge of the project to clearly understand it. Summarize the purpose, need, project attributes, the relationship to surface transportation, how the project improves safety, and expected benefits. The Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan proposes the development of a comprehensive wayfinding and signage system for Key West and Stock Island. By improving pedestrian, cyclist, and motorist navigation, the project aims to enhance safety, accessibility, and mobility for residents, workers, and tourists. A user-friendly system of signage, maps, and directional cues is needed to guide individuals efficiently to their destinations. The project involves the creation of clear, consistent, and conspicuous wayfinding signage, pavement markings, and informational materials. Navigation errors will be reduced, traffic flow will be improved, and overall transportation experiences will be enhanced. By promoting alternative modes of transportation, such as walking and biking, the project also aids motor vehicle circulation. It fosters improved traffic management, particularly in densely populated areas, and encourages shared pathways and roads. By promoting active transportation and reducing congestion, it supports the circular economy. Among the benefits are reduced traffic congestion, improved accessibility to local businesses and attractions, improved safety, greater economic activity, and increased environmental sustainability as more people walk and bike. As a result of this project, Key West will become a safer and more attractive destination for residents and visitors alike with an efficient and cohesive wayfinding system. REQUIRED ® PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including 1) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome; detailed description of the existing conditions; and detailed description of the proposed project and major work item improvements (e.g., project limits (begin / end), width of sidewalks or trails and other components, materials, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement markings, etc.). 2) Intent to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for delivering the project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved facility, and compliance with all federal and state requirements. 3151 1. Indicate the municipality(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). City of Key West 2. Indicate the county(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). Monroe County 3. Roadway Classification Yes a No State roadway (on-system) Yes a No Federal roadway Yes a No Local roadway (off-system) 4. Indicate the roadway name(s) [including applicable state, federal, county road number(s), local roadway name, and roadway identification number(e.g., SR 5/ US 1 / CR 904/Overseas Highway/ ID number: 90040000)]. (Word limit 10). N/A 5. Indicate the roadway beginning project limits (south or west termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). N/A 6. Indicate the roadway ending project limits (north or east termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). N/A 7. Indicate the total project length, in miles and linear feet. (Word limit 10). N/A 8. Does the project involve the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail network? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the trailway identification number, beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 9. Within the next five years, are non-FDOT funds being expended within the limits or adjacent to the proposed project? If not, select "no" and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain. (Word limit 50). Yes • No N/A 3152 PART 5 - PROJECT TYPE NOTE: Certain areas may not be prioritizing Non-infrastructure (NI) proposals or all eligible infrastructure activities (or may recommend bundling activities together). Contact your district representative for guidance. IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIWNMMM IIIIIIWIINJ IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ IRII@IIE IIMIMMI IIWNMMM II1111MA11 II1111MI@III IIMIMMI IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM IIWNMMM IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ MUM IIIIIIull11H MUM IIWNMMM MUM IIWNMMM IIWNMMMM IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM II1111MI@III IIWNMMMM IIIIIIull11H IIMIMMI II1111MA11 IIIIIIWIINJ II1111MA11 IImmm IIWN!M!M IImmm IIWN!M!M 1. PROJECT CATEGORY Select one box that best represents the project proposal. Then, complete either the "Infrastructure" or "NI" selections. A. Infrastructure. If so, select "yes", B. Non-infrastructure (NI). If so, select "yes", then then select the most appropriate select the most appropriate NI eligible activity from "infrastructure" eligible activity from the listing following the Infrastructure activities. listing below. (Pages range 5-6) (Page range 7) 5-A. INFRASTRUCTURE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY Select one box that best represents the project proposal).As applicable, complete infrastructure eligible text fields. Pedestrian and / or Bicycle facilities (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of off-road trail facilities or on-road facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation). Safe Routes for Non-Drivers (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of infrastructure related projects and systems that provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs). Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails (Select this box for conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors into trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonmotorized transportation users). Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks (Select this box for construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways visible from the project or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Outdoor Advertising Management (Select this box for inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Historic Preservation and Rehabilitation of Historic Transportation Facilities (Select this box for historic preservation or rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities). If"yes", list any locally designated or National Register of Historic Places listed or eligible resources or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Vegetation Management (Select this box for vegetation management in public transportation ROW to improve roadway safety, prevent invasive species, and erosion control). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). 3153 Part 5-A Infrastructure Eligible Activity continued... m Archaeological Activities (Select this box for archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects funded by FHWA). If"yes", list the State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the archaeological site, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Stormwater Mitigation (Select this box for environmental mitigation activities addressing stormwater management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to transportation projects). Wildlife Management (Select this box for wildlife mitigation and reduction of wildlife mortality, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats). Boulevards (Select this box for boulevards, defined as a walkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfares in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These may be high ridership transit corridors; serve as primary goods movement and emergency response routes; and use vehicular and pedestrian access management techniques that promote economic revitalization and follow complete street principles]. If"yes", list any Florida Main Street communities or Florida Trail Towns within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Recreational Trails Program [Select this box for recreational trails compliant with 62-S-2, Florida Administrative Code, and 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)]. If"yes", list the parks / recreational areas within the project limits, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) [Select this box for SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208, that substantially improves the ability of kindergarten through 12th grade students (vulnerable road users) to walk and /or bicycle to school]. Traditionally includes sidewalks, traffic calming and speed reduction, traffic diversion improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossings, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle facilities, and bicycle parking facilities at public schools. If"yes", list the benefiting schools that are within two miles of the project limits; total student enrollment; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Other surface transportation eligible purpose (Only if within urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000). If"yes", list the eligible activity or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 5). 3154 ® *** Note: For Infrastructure projects, skip this page.*** Select one box that represents the project proposal. Checkbox indicating NI eligible activity. Document allows one selection. Vulnerable road user safety assessment as defined by Section 316.027 (b), F.S. Workforce development, training and education activities that are eligible uses of TAP funds. SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208. This NI activity must be primarily based at the school and benefit students and /or their parents and have documented support from the school(s). If"yes", list the benefiting schools; total student enrollment and students served by project; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in space provided. (Word limit 10). NI COMPONENTS As applicable, insert the number of each type of proposed activity. Numerical field indicating total number NI program would provide. Number of walk or bicycle audits. Number of after school programs receiving / Number of bicycle skills /safety classes. pedestrian / bicycle safety instructioneducation. Number of pedestrian skills/ safety classes. Number of bicycle rodeos. Number of community demonstration projects. Number of pedestrian safety skills events. Number of community encouragement activities. Number of schools with walking school Number of community challenges. bus programs (defined as planned route Number of community workshops /stakeholder with meeting points, a timetable, and a meetings. schedule of trained volunteers). Number of classroom / educational classes Number of schools with bicycle train receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / programs (defined as a planned route education. with meeting points, a timetable, and a schedule of trained volunteers). Number of school assemblies receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / education. Number of student-led leadership initiatives (e.g., student patrols, peer-led Number of training sessions to implement the SRTS learning, etc.). program (e.g., training for volunteer walking school bus leaders, training for bicycle train leaders, etc.). 3155 PART 6 - AREA CONDITIONS Select applicable boxes describing the area and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Select one box that describes the geographic population size of the project area. Non-Urban Area with a population of 5,000 or less • Urban Area with a population greater than 5,000 but no more than 50,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 50,000 but no more than 200,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 200,000 2. Is the project within the boundary of an MPO*? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the MPO in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes 0 No 3. Is the project within the boundary of a Transportation Management Area (TMA)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the TMA in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 4. Is the project within a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) community or designated as a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) as defined pursuant to Section 288.0656, F.S.? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes" and indicate the REDI / RAO in the space provided. (Word limit 5) Yes 0 No 5. Indicate the United States Congressional District number(s) of the project location. (Word limit 5). Congressional District 26 (118th Congress), Florida 6. Will the project address equity by providing benefits to traditionally underserved communities as determined by the U.S. Census? These communities could include low-income residents, minorities, those with limited English proficiency, persons with disabilities, children, or older adults. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain how the project improves environmental justice (e.g., disadvantage community access point(s) and destinations the project benefits, median household income, free or reduced priced school meals and how SRTS projects benefit the students, etc.). (Word limit 10). • Yes No Enhancing accessibility and navigation benefits all Key West residents equitably. 7. Are there transit stops /shelters /support facilities within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the identification number. (Word limit 5). Yes No No- N/A 8. Is the project within a high-crash pedestrian corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving pedestrians)? Yes No 3156 Part 6-Area Conditions continued... m 9. Is the project within a high-crash bicycle corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving bicyclists)? Yes a No 10.Would the project implement a bicycle or pedestrian action plan(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and specify the name of the plan and date of adoption. (Word limit 5). Yes No N/A *Metropolitan/Transportation Planning Organization/Agency(MPO) REQUIRED ® AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies, maps illustrating transit facilities and connectivity to the improvement, short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SRTS projects, median household income by census tract for community benefiting, collision heat maps / crash data for area surrounding project limits, etc.). PART 7 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement, engagement, and collaboration is a key component of the federal project development process and must be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in the event the project is selected for funding. Indicate which of the following are applicable (Select all that apply). Complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Does the greater community support the project, as demonstrated by recently adopted proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment and public engagement? If"yes", explain the engagement and how the concept evolved based on public involvement. Indicate the resolution number, adoption date, and participating parties in the space provided. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). • Yes No RESOLUTION NO. 23-311, Adopted 11/9/23 2. Was the project discussed at a regularly scheduled meeting of an advisory board of an appointed group of citizens, such as bicycle pedestrian advisory groups or similar committee that provides support toward the project? If"yes", provide meeting information, including the date and type of advisory board meeting, and the input received. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). • Yes No Bike Ped Plan, Strategic Plan, Mallory Square: Signage &Wayfinding Analysis 3. Was there an advertised public meeting to discuss the project? If"yes", provide a brief description, including the input received, how the concept evolved based on public involvement, date, and type of meeting. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). • Yes No City Commission Meeting, November 9, 2023 4. Do recent community surveys indicate both need and support for the project and stakeholders will continue to be engaged in the implementation of the project? If"yes", briefly explain. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). • Yes No Key West Community Survey for Strategic Plan (2021) REQUIRED ® PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., resolution, proclamation, regularly scheduled meeting agenda and minutes, public meeting advertisement, community survey, letters of support, etc.). 3157 m Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), and / or the long-term management plan(s)? [Note: Board of County Commissioners functions as MPO in nonmetropolitan areas (Section 339.135(4)(c)1, F.S.)]. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and use the text field to explain consistency, include MPO prioritization number. If a modification is required, indicate the meeting date for adoption. (Word limit 10). • Yes No Bike Ped Plan, Strategic Plan, Mallory Square: Signage &Wayfinding Analysis UPLOAD:REQUIRED CONCURRENCY / CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s), excerpt from comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), management plan(s), prioritization list, etc.). PART 9 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Select the boxes describing the Environmental Conditions.As applicable, complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Environmental Conditions section. 1. Does the project involve lands identified by the Florida Wildlife Corridor Act of 2021 [Section 259.1055, Florida Statutes (F.S.)]? Yes • No 2. Does the project involve state-owned conservation lands? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the state-owned conservation lands. NOTE: Use of state-owned conservation lands is subject to coordination by the managing entity. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 3. Does a railway facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate railway facility. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 4. Does the project physically cross a railway facility? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the crossing's railway identification number, and beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 5. Would the project provide lighting at locations with nighttime crashes? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe the proposed lighting in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 6. Would the project implement an adopted Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe proposed ADA improvements in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes • No 3158 Part 9- Environmental Conditions continued... m 7. Is an Environmental Assessment for the project complete? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe any specific issues in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes • No N/A 8. Is the project adjacent to locally designated or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible resources? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list resources, indicate if the resources have received Florida Department of State Historic Preservation Grant funds, and explain any preservation agreements, covenants, or easements in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes • No Unknown N/A 9. Are there any archaeological sites or Native American sites located within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the sites. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes • No Unknown N/A 10.Are there any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife /waterfowl refuges within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the facilities in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes • No N/A 11.Are there any navigable waterways adjacent to or within the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the navigable waterways. (Word limit 5). Yes • No N/A 12.Are there any wetlands within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. Include permit types required and any obtained for the project. (Word limit 5). Yes • No N/A 13.Is it likely that there are protected /endangered /threatened species and / or critical habitat impacts within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes • No Unknown N/A 14.Are there any potential contamination / hazardous waste areas within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes • No Unknown N/A 15.Are there any noise-sensitive areas near the project area? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown" (Word limit 5). Yes • No Unknown N/A REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits, copy of the entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans, etc.). 3159 PART 10 - DESIGN / TYPICAL SECTIONSm Select the boxes describing the design status and complete the text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Design /Typical Section. 1. Are signed and sealed design plans available for this project? Yes • No 2. If design plans are not at 100 percent, or do not meet current standards and /or reflect existing conditions, select the box identifying the status. (Word limit 100). • No design plans 30% design plans 60% design plans 90% design plans Other: N/A 3. Briefly describe the design status in the space provided. If design is at 100 percent, indicate the date of the plans. (Word limit 100). N/A REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): Typical Section(s) depicting existing and proposed features, dimensions, and ROW lines. If there are multiple segments, provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 3160 PART 11 - OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUSm Select the boxes describing the Ownership/ ROW Status and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Ownership/ ROW Status section. 1. Is ROW acquisition, defined as obtaining property not currently owned by the Local Agency through any means (e.g., deed, easement, dedication, donation, etc.), necessary to complete this project? Yes • No 2. Explain the ROW status (owned /fee simple, leased / less-than fee, and /or needs) along the project boundary, including when ROW was obtained and how ownership is documented (e.g., plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, transfers, easements). Provide information for verifying ownership (e.g., book/ page number, transfer agreements, dates, etc.). If ROW acquisition is necessary before constructing the proposed project and / or the applicant agency is not the landowner, indicate the necessary coordination with other owners for all fee-simple purchases and / or any less-than fee/ lease needs (including temporary construction and /or other easements and / or permits for drainage, railroad, utilities, etc.) necessary to secure ROW certification. Indicate the proposed acquisition timeline, expected funding source, the total number of parcels, type of acquisition, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed land. (Word limit 150). N/A REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting site control and related landowner supporting documentation. Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s) comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is control of the project site (e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats, warranty deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, easements, use agreement, etc.). Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership in relation to the project boundary and /or limits. NOTE: provide map documentation on 8.5" x 11" scale. DO NOT provide reduced copies of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. If applicable, an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project, together with a spreadsheet providing the tax identification number(s) of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcel. 3161 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) 3162 Part 12 - Project Implementation and Costs continued... m *** Note: applications for infrastructure projects do not need to fill out this page*** NI Cost Narrative Table Below each item, explain how the item will support the program, and other appropriate details. umHp��N���G tl�V�q�IIIIIU�mu �n�nnm�k�P pN" �b�� g, ^��.I ,�, �pU �„p> NI• ,�> „,� .tlN tlN I� „.� tlN �� �� ,�,.,;� tlN tlk, ,�, ,„..tlN i ,„.� �� � ,�, ,�, U'� ^���, �� tl�.tlN tlN. ,tlry,. lu G � q Narrative: Narrative: Narrative: m Materials and Supplies: Educational items: Promotional Items: Other Expenses: Equipment: u 3163 RESOURCES FDOT Transportation Alternatives Program: httpLL/ A w.fdot.gov/plan ni ng/systems/systems-ma nagement/tap FDOT Local Agency Program Manual: http://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/LP/Default.shtm FDOT Office of Environmental Management PD&E Manual: https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman®current FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual: https://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/estimates/documents/basisofestimatesmanual/boemanual Florida Safe Routes to School Guidelines: https://www.fdot.gov/safety/2A®Programs/Safe®Routes.shtm 3164 00 FD TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan LOCATION: City of Key West PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) N/A (to north or east limit) N/A By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match, incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP agreement, and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). V( Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NEPA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic 1/ Preservation Officer(SHPO), and other State and/or Federal agencies, prior to construction. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT's Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDO,,,Ys or P ogram. A{or legal S� .. * Signature a` Albert Childress Name (please type or print) a� +C City Manager .....do .... Title Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FDOT SET-ASIDE PROGRAM (TA) FUNDING APPLICATION A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) [§ 11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 133(h)]. District representatives may be contacted for guidance. PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Applicant Agency Sponsor Type. Select the box indicating the agency of the person who can answer questions about this project proposal. Then complete applicable text fields. Note: State-recognized non-profit agencies may partner with an eligible governmental entity but are not eligible as a direct grant recipient. Checkbox next to each of the following types of agencies that do not indicate text field. Document allows one selection. Local government (e.g., county, city, village, town, etc.). Regional transportation authority or transit agency. Natural resource or public land agency. School district, local education agency, or school (may include any public or nonprofit private school). Projects should benefit the public and not just a private entity. Recognized Tribal Government. Other local or regional governmental entity with oversight responsibility for transportation or recreational trails, consistent with the goals of 23 U.S.C. 133(h). Metropolitan /Transportation Planning Organization /Agency (collectively MPO) (only for urbanized areas with less than 200,000 population). FDOT (only by request of another eligible entity, then enter the requesting entity). If"checked", enter the requesting entity in the space provided. (Word limit 5) 2. Agency name of the applicant. (Word limit 5). 3. Agency contact person's name and title. (Word limit 5). 4. Agency contact person's telephone number and email address. (Word limit 5). 3166 PART 2 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) CERTIFICATION LAP is FDOT's primary mechanism to provide governmental subrecipients with federal funds to develop transportation infrastructure facilities through cost-reimbursement (grant) agreements. This legal instrument (the grant agreement) will describe intergovernmental tasks to be accomplished and the funds to be reimbursed for selected projects. The FDOT Local Programs Manual and FDOT Procedure 525-010-300 provides details for local agencies to complete a certification process that is a risk-based assessment evaluating whether they have sufficient qualifications and abilities "to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work" for infrastructure projects. Non-profit organizations are not eligible for LAP certification, local agencies are not eligible for certification of Project Development and Environment (PD&E) or Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition phases. FDOT is required to provide oversight on fee-simple and less-than-fee ROW acquisition phases, including license agreements, encroachment agreements, perpetual easements, temporary construction easements, and donations. LAP Full Certification Provide: Approval Date: and Expiration Date: Responsible Charge Name: LAP Project Specific Certification Provide: Approval Date: Project FM(s) Number: Responsible Charge Name: Not LAP Certified —A LAP Certified Agency will deliver the project on behalf of the uncertified Agency. Provide: Sponsoring Contact Agency Name: Name: Address: Phone: Not LAP Certified - FDOT District will administer the project. Provide: FDOT Contact Name: Phone: Not LAP Certified —the Agency will become LAP certified 1 year prior to the delivery of the LAP project. Not Applicable—this is a Non — Infrastructure Project. 3167 1. Project Name /Title: (Word limit 15). 2. Is this a resubmittal of a previously unfunded project? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the year(s) of submittal(s) and include project title(s), if different, in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does this project connect a previously funded project(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the Financial Management (FM) number(s) and provide a brief description of the other related FDOT-funded phases that are complete, underway, or in the FDOT 5-year Work Program. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is funding requested for this same project from another source administered by FDOT? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate funding source(s) / application(s) submitted. NOTE: Contact your district representative to discuss if this same project is partially funded in the 5-year Work Program or if FDOT has received another application for funding it. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. What are you proposing in this application? In 200 words or less, provide a description of the project and what it will accomplish. The description should allow a person without prior knowledge of the project to clearly understand it. Summarize the purpose, need, project attributes, the relationship to surface transportation, how the project improves safety, and expected benefits. REQUIRED ® PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including 1) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome; detailed description of the existing conditions; and detailed description of the proposed project and major work item improvements (e.g., project limits (begin / end), width of sidewalks or trails and other components, materials, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement markings, etc.). 2) Intent to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for delivering the project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved facility, and compliance with all federal and state requirements. 3168 1. Indicate the municipality(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 2. Indicate the county(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 3. Roadway Classification Yes No State roadway (on-system) Yes No Federal roadway Yes No Local roadway (off-system) 4. Indicate the roadway name(s) [including applicable state, federal, county road number(s), local roadway name, and roadway identification number(e.g., SR 5/ US 1 / CR 904/Overseas Highway/ ID number: 90040000)]. (Word limit 10). 5. Indicate the roadway beginning project limits (south or west termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 6. Indicate the roadway ending project limits (north or east termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 7. Indicate the total project length, in miles and linear feet. (Word limit 10). 8. Does the project involve the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail network? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the trailway identification number, beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 9. Within the next five years, are non-FDOT funds being expended within the limits or adjacent to the proposed project? If not, select "no" and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain. (Word limit 50). Yes No 3169 PART 5 - PROJECT TYPE NOTE: Certain areas may not be prioritizing Non-infrastructure (NI) proposals or all eligible infrastructure activities (or may recommend bundling activities together). Contact your district representative for guidance. IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIWNMMM IIIIIIWIINJ IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ IRII@IIE IIMIMMI IIWNMMM II1111MA11 II1111MI@III IIMIMMI IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM IIWNMMM IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ MUM IIIIIIull11H MUM IIWNMMM MUM IIWNMMM IIWNMMMM IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM II1111MI@III IIWNMMMM IIIIIIull11H IIMIMMI II1111MA11 IIIIIIWIINJ II1111MA11 IImmm IIWN!M!M IImmm IIWN!M!M 1. PROJECT CATEGORY Select one box that best represents the project proposal. Then, complete either the "Infrastructure" or "NI" selections. A. Infrastructure. If so, select "yes", B. Non-infrastructure (NI). If so, select "yes", then then select the most appropriate select the most appropriate NI eligible activity from "infrastructure" eligible activity from the listing following the Infrastructure activities. listing below. (Pages range 5-6) (Page range 7) 5-A. INFRASTRUCTURE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY Select one box that best represents the project proposal).As applicable, complete infrastructure eligible text fields. Pedestrian and / or Bicycle facilities (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of off-road trail facilities or on-road facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation). Safe Routes for Non-Drivers (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of infrastructure related projects and systems that provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs). Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails (Select this box for conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors into trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonmotorized transportation users). Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks (Select this box for construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways visible from the project or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Outdoor Advertising Management (Select this box for inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Historic Preservation and Rehabilitation of Historic Transportation Facilities (Select this box for historic preservation or rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities). If"yes", list any locally designated or National Register of Historic Places listed or eligible resources or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Vegetation Management (Select this box for vegetation management in public transportation ROW to improve roadway safety, prevent invasive species, and erosion control). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). 3170 Part 5-A Infrastructure Eligible Activity continued... m Archaeological Activities (Select this box for archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects funded by FHWA). If"yes", list the State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the archaeological site, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Stormwater Mitigation (Select this box for environmental mitigation activities addressing stormwater management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to transportation projects). Wildlife Management (Select this box for wildlife mitigation and reduction of wildlife mortality, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats). Boulevards (Select this box for boulevards, defined as a walkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfares in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These may be high ridership transit corridors; serve as primary goods movement and emergency response routes; and use vehicular and pedestrian access management techniques that promote economic revitalization and follow complete street principles]. If"yes", list any Florida Main Street communities or Florida Trail Towns within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Recreational Trails Program [Select this box for recreational trails compliant with 62-S-2, Florida Administrative Code, and 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)]. If"yes", list the parks / recreational areas within the project limits, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) [Select this box for SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208, that substantially improves the ability of kindergarten through 12th grade students (vulnerable road users) to walk and /or bicycle to school]. Traditionally includes sidewalks, traffic calming and speed reduction, traffic diversion improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossings, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle facilities, and bicycle parking facilities at public schools. If"yes", list the benefiting schools that are within two miles of the project limits; total student enrollment; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Other surface transportation eligible purpose (Only if within urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000). If"yes", list the eligible activity or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 5). 3171 ® *** Note: For Infrastructure projects, skip this page.*** Select one box that represents the project proposal. Checkbox indicating NI eligible activity. Document allows one selection. Vulnerable road user safety assessment as defined by Section 316.027 (b), F.S. Workforce development, training and education activities that are eligible uses of TAP funds. SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208. This NI activity must be primarily based at the school and benefit students and /or their parents and have documented support from the school(s). If"yes", list the benefiting schools; total student enrollment and students served by project; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in space provided. (Word limit 10). NI COMPONENTS As applicable, insert the number of each type of proposed activity. Numerical field indicating total number NI program would provide. Number of walk or bicycle audits. Number of after school programs receiving / Number of bicycle skills /safety classes. pedestrian / bicycle safety instructioneducation. Number of pedestrian skills/ safety classes. Number of bicycle rodeos. Number of community demonstration projects. Number of pedestrian safety skills events. Number of community encouragement activities. Number of schools with walking school Number of community challenges. bus programs (defined as planned route Number of community workshops /stakeholder with meeting points, a timetable, and a meetings. schedule of trained volunteers). Number of classroom / educational classes Number of schools with bicycle train receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / programs (defined as a planned route education. with meeting points, a timetable, and a schedule of trained volunteers). Number of school assemblies receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / education. Number of student-led leadership initiatives (e.g., student patrols, peer-led Number of training sessions to implement the SRTS learning, etc.). program (e.g., training for volunteer walking school bus leaders, training for bicycle train leaders, etc.). 3172 PART 6 - AREA CONDITIONS Select applicable boxes describing the area and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Select one box that describes the geographic population size of the project area. Non-Urban Area with a population of 5,000 or less Urban Area with a population greater than 5,000 but no more than 50,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 50,000 but no more than 200,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 200,000 2. Is the project within the boundary of an MPO*? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the MPO in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Is the project within the boundary of a Transportation Management Area (TMA)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the TMA in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is the project within a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) community or designated as a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) as defined pursuant to Section 288.0656, F.S.? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes" and indicate the REDI / RAO in the space provided. (Word limit 5) Yes No 5. Indicate the United States Congressional District number(s) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 6. Will the project address equity by providing benefits to traditionally underserved communities as determined by the U.S. Census? These communities could include low-income residents, minorities, those with limited English proficiency, persons with disabilities, children, or older adults. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain how the project improves environmental justice (e.g., disadvantage community access point(s) and destinations the project benefits, median household income, free or reduced priced school meals and how SRTS projects benefit the students, etc.). (Word limit 10). Yes No 7. Are there transit stops /shelters /support facilities within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the identification number. (Word limit 5). Yes No 8. Is the project within a high-crash pedestrian corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving pedestrians)? Yes No 3173 Part 6-Area Conditions continued... m 9. Is the project within a high-crash bicycle corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving bicyclists)? Yes No 10.Would the project implement a bicycle or pedestrian action plan(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and specify the name of the plan and date of adoption. (Word limit 5). Yes No *Metropolitan/Transportation Planning Organization/Agency(MPO) REQUIRED ® AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies, maps illustrating transit facilities and connectivity to the improvement, short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SRTS projects, median household income by census tract for community benefiting, collision heat maps / crash data for area surrounding project limits, etc.). PART 7 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement, engagement, and collaboration is a key component of the federal project development process and must be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in the event the project is selected for funding. Indicate which of the following are applicable (Select all that apply). Complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Does the greater community support the project, as demonstrated by recently adopted proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment and public engagement? If"yes", explain the engagement and how the concept evolved based on public involvement. Indicate the resolution number, adoption date, and participating parties in the space provided. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 2. Was the project discussed at a regularly scheduled meeting of an advisory board of an appointed group of citizens, such as bicycle pedestrian advisory groups or similar committee that provides support toward the project? If"yes", provide meeting information, including the date and type of advisory board meeting, and the input received. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 3. Was there an advertised public meeting to discuss the project? If"yes", provide a brief description, including the input received, how the concept evolved based on public involvement, date, and type of meeting. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 4. Do recent community surveys indicate both need and support for the project and stakeholders will continue to be engaged in the implementation of the project? If"yes", briefly explain. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No REQUIRED ® PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., resolution, proclamation, regularly scheduled meeting agenda and minutes, public meeting advertisement, community survey, letters of support, etc.). 3174 m Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), and / or the long-term management plan(s)? [Note: Board of County Commissioners functions as MPO in nonmetropolitan areas (Section 339.135(4)(c)1, F.S.)]. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and use the text field to explain consistency, include MPO prioritization number. If a modification is required, indicate the meeting date for adoption. (Word limit 10). Yes No UPLOAD:REQUIRED CONCURRENCY / CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s), excerpt from comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), management plan(s), prioritization list, etc.). PART 9 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Select the boxes describing the Environmental Conditions.As applicable, complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Environmental Conditions section. 1. Does the project involve lands identified by the Florida Wildlife Corridor Act of 2021 [Section 259.1055, Florida Statutes (F.S.)]? Yes No 2. Does the project involve state-owned conservation lands? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the state-owned conservation lands. NOTE: Use of state-owned conservation lands is subject to coordination by the managing entity. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does a railway facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate railway facility. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Does the project physically cross a railway facility? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the crossing's railway identification number, and beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. Would the project provide lighting at locations with nighttime crashes? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe the proposed lighting in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 6. Would the project implement an adopted Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe proposed ADA improvements in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3175 Part 9- Environmental Conditions continued... m 7. Is an Environmental Assessment for the project complete? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe any specific issues in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 8. Is the project adjacent to locally designated or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible resources? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list resources, indicate if the resources have received Florida Department of State Historic Preservation Grant funds, and explain any preservation agreements, covenants, or easements in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 9. Are there any archaeological sites or Native American sites located within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the sites. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 10.Are there any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife /waterfowl refuges within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the facilities in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 11.Are there any navigable waterways adjacent to or within the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the navigable waterways. (Word limit 5). Yes No 12.Are there any wetlands within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. Include permit types required and any obtained for the project. (Word limit 5). Yes No 13.Is it likely that there are protected /endangered /threatened species and / or critical habitat impacts within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 14.Are there any potential contamination / hazardous waste areas within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 15.Are there any noise-sensitive areas near the project area? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown" (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits, copy of the entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans, etc.). 3176 PART 10 - DESIGN / TYPICAL SECTIONSm Select the boxes describing the design status and complete the text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Design /Typical Section. 1. Are signed and sealed design plans available for this project? Yes No 2. If design plans are not at 100 percent, or do not meet current standards and /or reflect existing conditions, select the box identifying the status. (Word limit 100). No design plans 30% design plans 60% design plans 90% design plans Other: 3. Briefly describe the design status in the space provided. If design is at 100 percent, indicate the date of the plans. (Word limit 100). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): Typical Section(s) depicting existing and proposed features, dimensions, and ROW lines. If there are multiple segments, provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 3177 PART 11 - OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUSm Select the boxes describing the Ownership/ ROW Status and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Ownership/ ROW Status section. 1. Is ROW acquisition, defined as obtaining property not currently owned by the Local Agency through any means (e.g., deed, easement, dedication, donation, etc.), necessary to complete this project? Yes No 2. Explain the ROW status (owned /fee simple, leased / less-than fee, and /or needs) along the project boundary, including when ROW was obtained and how ownership is documented (e.g., plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, transfers, easements). Provide information for verifying ownership (e.g., book/ page number, transfer agreements, dates, etc.). If ROW acquisition is necessary before constructing the proposed project and / or the applicant agency is not the landowner, indicate the necessary coordination with other owners for all fee-simple purchases and / or any less-than fee/ lease needs (including temporary construction and /or other easements and / or permits for drainage, railroad, utilities, etc.) necessary to secure ROW certification. Indicate the proposed acquisition timeline, expected funding source, the total number of parcels, type of acquisition, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed land. (Word limit 150). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting site control and related landowner supporting documentation. Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s) comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is control of the project site (e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats, warranty deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, easements, use agreement, etc.). Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership in relation to the project boundary and /or limits. NOTE: provide map documentation on 8.5" x 11" scale. DO NOT provide reduced copies of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. If applicable, an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project, together with a spreadsheet providing the tax identification number(s) of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcel. 3178 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) 3179 Part 12 - Project Implementation and Costs continued... m *** Note: applications for infrastructure projects do not need to fill out this page*** NI Cost Narrative Table Below each item, explain how the item will support the program, and other appropriate details. umHp��N���G tl�V�q�IIIIIU�mu �n�nnm�k�P pN" �b�� g, ^��.I ,�, �pU �„p> NI• ,�> „,� .tlN tlN I� „.� tlN �� �� ,�,.,;� tlN tlk, ,�, ,„..tlN i ,„.� �� � ,�, ,�, U'� ^���, �� tl�.tlN tlN. ,tlry,. lu G � q Narrative: Narrative: Narrative: Materials and Supplies: Educational items: Promotional Items: Other Expenses: Equipment: u 3180 RESOURCES FDOT Transportation Alternatives Program: httpLL/ A w.fdot.gov/plan ni ng/systems/systems-ma nagement/tap FDOT Local Agency Program Manual: http://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/LP/Default.shtm FDOT Office of Environmental Management PD&E Manual: https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman®current FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual: https://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/estimates/documents/basisofestimatesmanual/boemanual Florida Safe Routes to School Guidelines: https://www.fdot.gov/safety/2A®Programs/Safe®Routes.shtm 3181 FDOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM „mmloo!!p ii0ow, � m w CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) (to north or east limit) By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match, incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP agreement, and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NEPA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and other State and/or Federal agencies, prior to construction. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT's Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDOT's Work Program. * Signature Name (please type or print) Title Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). 3182 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 11111EQUI11RIED UIPLOAD, PROJECT INFORIMAT1011411 SUPPORTING i 'i T1 0 Inclluuding '11) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome,detailed descrilptiion of the existing conditicnsa and detaliled description of the(proposed project and major work Item Improvements (e.g.,(project limits(begin I end)v width of sidewalks or trails and father components, matehais,drainage, lighting,signing and pavement markings,etc.). ) Intent to enter Into a cost reimbursement agreement for dellNering the(project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the,applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandu rn of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for onguairng operations end maintenance of the improved facility',and Compliance with all federal and state requirements. Scope of Work COMPLETION OF COCO PLUM DRIVE MULTI-USE PATH/TURN-AROUND SCOPE OF WORK Background:The Coco Plum Drive Multi-Use Path project commenced in 2008 with the goal of creating a comprehensive multi-use path to enhance connectivity within the community.The most recent section of the path was completed in 2014,which brought the path up to Avenue K.To fulfill the original vision and ensure a seamless and fully connected pathway, it is now proposed to complete the remaining sections of the Coco Plum Multi-Use Path and add lighting to this section. Project Objectives: Path Completion: Identify and complete the missing segments of the Coco Plum Multi-Use Path to create a continuous and interconnected pathway for pedestrians and cyclists.The project will start at Avenue K on the Western Point and Terminate at the End of the Roadway/Turn-Around (nearest crossroad is Ave O). Infrastructure Evaluation:Conduct a thorough evaluation of the existing path sections completed in 2014 to assess their condition and identify any necessary maintenance or improvements. Safety Enhancements: Install lighting along the new section of the path. Implement safety measures, such as signage, lighting, and crosswalks, to ensure the security of path users, especially at road crossings and intersections. Landscaping and Beautification: Integrate landscaping elements and aesthetic enhancements along the path to create an attractive and inviting environment for users. Accessibility Compliance: Ensure that the completed path complies with accessibility standards, including provisions for individuals with disabilities, to promote inclusivity and equal access. Community Engagement:Conduct additional community outreach programs to inform residents and stakeholders about the project,gather input, and address any concerns or suggestions. Project Phases: Pre-Construction Phase: Review existing project documentation, including plans and permits. Conduct site assessments to identify potential challenges and opportunities. Engage with community stakeholders to gather feedback and incorporate community preferences into the project design. Design and Permitting: Develop detailed engineering plans for the remaining sections of the Coco Plum Multi-Use Path. Obtain necessary permits and approvals from regulatory authorities. Construction Phase: Procure contractors through a competitive bidding process. Oversee construction activities to ensure compliance with design specifications and safety standards. Implement landscaping and aesthetic enhancements as outlined in the project objectives. 18 of 9C3183 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Post-Construction Phase:Conduct a final inspection to ensure the completed path meets all standards and requirements. Develop and implement a maintenance plan for ongoing upkeep. Facilitate a community unveiling event to celebrate the project's completion and engage with residents. Reporting and Documentation: Provide regular progress reports to stakeholders, including updates on construction milestones, budget expenditures, and any challenges encountered. Maintain comprehensive documentation of all project-related activities, expenses, and communications. Cost Reimbursement Agreement: Complete a cost reimbursement agreement (LAP Agreement) for the completion of the Coco Plum Multi-Use Path. This Scope of Work outlines the comprehensive approach to completing the Coco Plum Multi-Use Path project, ensuring that it not only fulfills its initial vision but also enhances the community's connectivity, safety, and overall quality of life. The cost reimbursement agreement is proposed to streamline financial arrangements and ensure the successful delivery of this essential community infrastructure. 19 of 9C3184 REQUIRED UPLOAD,, I I IT11 SUPPORTING TI DOCUMENTATION(e. .,excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies,maps Oliustratting transit facilities and connectivity to the Improvement,short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SiRT5 projects, median houasehoid income by census tract for community benefiting, coilllision heat:maps J crash data for area surrounding,project Ilirnits,etc.). Project is adjacent to low functioning salt marsh and buttonwood wetland. City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan Adopted March 8, 2005 Effective July 7, 2005 Updated February, 2013 Transportation Element Objective 7-1.3 Encourage Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths In order to provide for bicycle and pedestrian travel that is safe, convenient, and efficient, the City shall assist, encourage, and provide bicycle and/or pedestrian paths. §163.3177(6)(b)1. F.S. Policy 7-1.3.1 Prepare Bicycle Path and Pedestrian Improvement Plan The City shall plan for coordinated bicycle path and pedestrian way improvements emphasizing access to schools, parks, and shopping centers, which supplement the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan. Policy 7-1.3.2 Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Path Network The City shall promote a systematic approach to the development of a pedestrian and bicycle path network.The City shall also investigate the increased use of golf carts and alternative transportation means by the public and private sectors in order to improve energy efficient transportation links between major activity areas such as residential neighborhoods, schools, employment centers, shopping areas, resorts and parks and recreational areas. Objective 4-1.10 Preservation of Historical,Cultural,or Archaeological Features Policy 4-1.10.5 Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Path Network The City shall promote a systematic approach to the development of a pedestrian and bicycle path network.The City shall also investigate the increased use of golf carts and alternative transportation means by the public and private sectors in order to improve energy efficient transportation links between major activity areas such as residential neighborhoods, schools, employment centers, shopping areas, resorts and parks and recreational areas. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES PURPOSE Pursuant to Chapter 163.3177(6)(e) F.S. the purpose of the Recreation and Open Space Element is to plan for a system of public and private sites for passive and active recreation and open space. GOAL 8-1 PROVIDE SAFE AND ADEQUATE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES It is the goal of the City to provide safe and adequate open space and recreation facilities that are accessible to all Marathon residents. §163.3177(6)(e) F.S. Objective 8-1.1 Plan for Recreational Trails and Open Space The City shall comprehensively plan for creating new or enhanced recreational trail systems and open space facilities, based upon data, standards, and policies contained in the Plan, and shall adequately maintain the provided sites and facilities. Through the Capital Improvements Plan, the City shall ensure that sufficient acreage is maintained and acquired and sufficient facilities 20 of SIC3185 are maintained and developed to meet these needs. §163.3177(6)(e)F.S. Policy 8-1.1.1 Adopt a Minimum Level of Service Standard The City shall adopt a minimum level of service standard for City-managed public recreation sites of 4.42 acres per 1,000 permanent residents and seasonal visitors.The specific number, size, type, and location of facilities shall be determined through the development of a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan as required by Policy 8-1.1.2. Policy 8-1.1.2 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan The City shall fully examine the existing recreation and open space areas and prepare a master plan.The master plan shall make recommendations, as needed,to enhance equitable access, distribution, and availability to recreational facilities or open space. Policy 8-1.1.3 Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply The City shall periodically prepare a report, as established by the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, updating the recreational land and facility demand and supply analysis contained in the Recreation and Open Space Data Inventory and Analysis of this Plan. If the analysis identifies any deficiencies, the City shall identify and enact a method for meeting the deficiency. City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan Adopted March 8, 2005 Page 118 of 121 Chapter 8 Effective July 7,2005 Updated February, 2013 Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 8-1.1.4 Program Park Improvements Park improvement plans resulting from the analysis in Policy 8-1.1.3 shall be programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Policy 8-1.1.5 Maintain Existing Recreational Land and Facilities The City shall establish a routine preventive maintenance program and shall annually review all City owned recreational and open space resources for safety standards, compliance to applicable regulations, and stormwater management. Policy 8-1.1.6 Improve the Existing Recreational Facilities Upon the basis of the annual review,the City shall improve the physical and aesthetic condition of the City's recreational and open space facilities by allocating funding through the Capital Improvements Program. Policy 8-1.1.7 Ensure Accessibility Through the annual review and development review process, the City shall ensure that all public recreational facilities be made accessible to automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians depending on the type of facility. Lands dedicated solely for open space or conservation are exempt from this requirement. Policy 8-1.1.8 Ensure Compliance with the Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Through development review,the City shall ensure that all future parks and recreational facilities comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.Through development review, the City shall ensure that all renovating, rehabilitating, and upgrading to parks and recreational facilities comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Policy 8-1.1.9 Require Mandatory Land Dedication or Fees in Lieu TherEOf The City shall continue to maintain Land Development Regulations mandating the dedication of land for parks and recreation or fees in lieu thereof for all new development, to be used for the acquisition of land for parks, conservation and open space.The formula shall be a pro rata formula based on the City's demand and supply analysis, to ensure that new developments provide necessary recreational lands, facilities and/or fees in lieu thereof in order to 21 of 9(,3186 accommodate the additional generated demand. Policy 8-1.1.10 Incorporate Creative Design Concepts and Conserve Environmentally Sensitive Open Space Active and passive recreation areas shall be planned in a manner compatible with the unique natural resources found in the City. Park improvement plans shall be designed to preserve, protect, and enhance the environmental features found on each site.Where appropriate, recreational areas shall be designed to provide a circulation system that minimizes conflict between bicyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles. Adequate landscape and screening shall be integrated into park improvement plans to minimize land use conflicts, protect stability of established residential areas, and enhance community appearance. Coco Plum Multo....Use Path Completion Map of Protect Location r � J@t,n�arrry „ � Suggested location for new pafh addition of lighting 22 of 9(,3187 VIU� �°�ONTY Monroe County, FL UNI2UE CU , t Overview Legend Major Roads v II u`^ I iy 1 Centerline Easements K,. wr Hooks Lot Lines Road Center Rights of Way Shoreline Key Names k �r f' r s I A,— Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Alternate ID 1449946 Owner Address CITY OF MARATHON Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Class RIGHT OF WAY 9805 Overseas Hwy Property Address VACANT LAND Marathon,FL 33050 MARATHON District 50CM Brief Tax Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P64-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC (11'^JoLP-1 II"JoL Lo Ibo a usod oii n IIrgalll docu uimcaii ft) Date created:11/29/2023 Last Data Uploaded:11/2 9/202 3 4:04:26 AM Developed bySchneider 23 of 9C3188 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Monroe County, FL Disclaimer The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office maintains data on property within the County solely for the purpose of fulfilling its responsibility to secure a just valuation for ad valorem tax purposes of all property within the County.The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office cannot guarantee its accuracy for any other purpose.Likewise,data provided regarding one tax year may not be applicable in prior or subsequent years.By requesting such data,you hereby understand and agree that the data is intended for ad valorem tax purposes only and should not be relied on for any other purpose. By continuing into this site you assert that you have read and agree to the above statement. Summary Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Account# 1449946 Property ID 1449946 MillageGroup 50CM Location Address VACANT LAND,MARATHON Legal Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P134-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC �aalaa:II'4W laa Ilya,w,ud ouii Ilu.a gall da cuilina.inil',r,J Neighborhood 10041 Property Class RIGHT OF WAY(9400) Subdivision Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Affordable Housing No Owner a:;Irlry;::�11 Irnlr fro-{;::�Ir ...................................................... 9805 Overseas Hwy Marathon FL 33050 Valuation 2023 Certified Values 2022 Certified Values 2021 Certified Values 2020 Certified Values + Market Improvement Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Misc Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Land Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Just Market Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Total Assessed Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 School Exempt Value ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) = School Taxable Value $0 $0 $0 $0 Historical Assessments Year Land Value Building Value Yard Item Value Just(Market)Value Assessed Value Exempt Value Taxable Value Maximum Portability 2022 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2021 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2020 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2019 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2018 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 Iic II`n1,�a;nlltrimruin I vane L;I llIIulu ir,iuiii ud luirinala oiiiIls uiiid°J-io.rd iniaal be i' 11iud rpnanru�lII lu iaaa.mlll Vpoiu Mb lIRy urino uiniL 4 oi[il ia: on WI icu Wvo.ufu lII iu H bmll Vpoiu MlLyoIIulu�irinoia iiL Land Land Use Number of Units Unit Type Frontage Depth (8600) 1.00 Lot 0 0 View Tax I nfo View axes'ftn LIhiis Ilaircell ......................................................... 3189 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 24 of 9(, „� 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Map 1 N I No data available for the following modules:Buildings,Yard Items,Sales,Permits,Sketches(click to enlarge),Photos,TRIM Notice. Schneider GCJ5 PAT IY4L U.Yr e it II°iriivyc 111 slIlia,v G I blFIR II°iri pa y Notice gsa,1 a pa p u�1i�il�p p� e��� aJ of 04 26A IV 3190 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 250 9( 1,� REQUIRED UIPLOAD., PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e,g., resolution, prodarnafion, regularly schedulled meefing agenda and minutes, public meefing advertisement, community survey,Iletters of support, etc,). Please see following for public support documentation: 3191 III , not avaflaI IIIe at the fli iitaat Lfl3i i i ii III III III III: III... ...IIL.. iinm n a oin III: 1.. . City of Marathon Planning Commission Monday November 20, 2023 9805 Overseas Hwy City Hall Council Chambers 5:30 PM 1. Call To Order 2. Pledge Of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval Of Minutes 5. Quasi-Judicial Statement 6. Items For Public Hearing 7. Adjournment 5. Please be advised that the item on the agenda is quasi-judicial in nature. If you wish to give testimony on any item, please inform the Boards clerk by filling out an available sign-up form. An opportunity to speak will be made available after the applicant and staff have made their presentations on each item. All testimony, including public testimony and evidence, will be made under oath or affirmation. Additionally, all persons giving testimony may be subject to cross examination. If you refuse either to be cross examined or to be sworn your testimony will not be considered. The public will not be allowed to cross examine witnesses, but they can ask the Commission to ask questions on their behalf. Persons representing organizations must present evidence of their authority to speak for the organization. 6. Items For Public Hearing 1. Consideration Of A Request For A Conditional Use Permit For Scott Ebert Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations (Code) Entitled "Conditional Use Permits" For Unification Of Two Residential Units Into A Single Family Residential Until With 11 Bedrooms And 11 Bathrooms; Located At 574 Sombrero Beach Road; Which Is Legally Described As Block 2 (Bottom Floor) Southerly And Northemly (Top Floor) Part Of Lot 17, Sombrero Beach Village Boot Key P135-86, Monroe County, Florida; Having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 And 00355110-000100,Nearest Mile Marker 50. 27 of 9C3192 kM\4M City of Marathon Planning Commission Monday July 17, 2023 o+; 9805 Overseas Hwy / City Hall Council Chambers MINUTES Sexton called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order on Monday July 17, 2023, at 5:30 pm. In attendance: Planning Director Brian Shea, Attorney Steve Williams, Planner Amber Stonik, Planner Erin Dafoe, and members of the public. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The roll was called. Mark Senmartin-present; Mary Ann Royse-present; Mike Cinque-present; Andrew George-present; Matt Sexton-present. Senmartin added a discussion on Planning packet requirements. Sexton called for an approval of the minutes from the last meeting. Senmartin moved to approve. Royse seconded. The motion was approved 5-0. The quasi-judicial statement was read into the record. The agenda packet requirements discussion was heard first. Addition of conceptual drawings and elevations should be required. A resolution will be generated for City Council to approve the additions to the packets. Item 1 was read into the record: Consideration Of A Request By Marathon LLC For A Conditional Use Permit, Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations ("The Code") Entitled "Conditional Use Permits", Authorizing The Development Of A Climate Controlled Storage Facility and Sixteen (16) Single Family Residential Units Consisting Of Five (5) Parcels Located At 775 1071h Street Ocean Which Is Legally Described As Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaccas Part Government Lot 1 and Part Government Lot 2 Part Parcel 3 And Adjacent Bay Bottom South Of And Adjacent Part Government Lot 1; 796 1061h St Ocean Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vacca Part Government Lot 2 Part Parcel 3; 797 1061h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaca Part Government Lot 2 Parcel 2; 630 1071h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaca Part Government Lot 1, And Vacant Land 1071h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaccas Part Government Lot 1, Monroe County, Florida, Having Real Estate Numbers 00104260-000000, 00104430-000300, 00104430-000200, 00104240-000400 and 00104240-000100. Nearest Mile Marker 53. Dafoe presented the item with the help of visual aids. Pagel of 4 28 of 9C3193 Jim Saunders presented the item on behalf of the applicant. There were no public speakers. Shea asked if there were any exparte-communications, Sexton and George received a phone call that would not affect their decisions. After a brief discussion on contained lighting, vegetation buffers, condo docs, speed bumps, and signage, Senmartin made a motion to approve Item 1 with the additional conditions which will amend conditions 12 and 13, add condition 30 for access signage, and add condition 31 for speed bump requirements. Royse seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Item 2 was read into the record: Consideration Of A Request By H & R Marathon LLC For A Conditional Use Permit, Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations ("The Code") Entitled "Conditional Use Permits", Authorizing The Development Of A Group Home Including Ten (10) Residential Units And Four (4) Affordable Housing Units, Dining Hall, Fitness Center, Storage And Commercial Kitchen; Which Is Legally Described As Section 5 Township 66 Range 33 Fat Deer Key Part Lot 3 And Part Government Lot 3 (AKA Part Of State Road No 5 (US 1)) And Section 5 Township 66 Range 33 Fat Deer Key Part Lot 3 (Part Old State Road), Monroe County, Florida, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100540-000000 And 00100640-000000. Nearest Mile Marker 53. Cinque recused himself from Item 2. Dafoe presented the item. Applicant Mike Murphy, CEO of Bravo Zulu Retreat, spoke about the organization and their mission. Phil Badalamenti from Little Red Rooster Architects presented the item for the applicant. Sexton opened the meeting to public speakers: • Julie Wilson voiced concerns regarding sewer, fencing, landscaping, drainage, construction time frame, construction dust and noise, retreat vs. resort, and the City's part in helping with $2 million dollar to build. Royse had exparte-communication with Catherine Felton of Little Red Rooster Architects that would not affect her decision. After a brief discussion, Senmartin moved to approve Item 2. George seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 4-0. Item 3 was read into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida, Amending Chapter 103 "Zoning Districts", Article 3 "Use And Intensity Tables", Updating Table 103.15.1 "Uses By Zoning District"; Providing For The Repeal Of All Code Provisions And Ordinances Inconsistent With Page 2 of 4 29 of 9C3194 This Ordinance; Providing For Severability; Providing For Inclusion In The Code Of Ordinances, City Of Marathon, Florida; And Providing An Effective Date. Brian Shea presented the item. This changes the code section/table on Open Air Markets to reflect a Conditional Use Permit is not required but the market owners would require a license. There were no public speakers. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 3. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Item 4 was read into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida, Amending Chapter 104 "Specific Use Regulations", Article 1 "General Provisions", Updating Section 104.25 "Hotels Or Motels"; Providing For The Repeal Of All Code Provisions And Ordinances Inconsistent With This Ordinance; Providing For Severability; Providing For Inclusion In The Code Of Ordinances, City Of Marathon, Florida; And Providing An Effective Date. Shea presented the item. This item amends requirements for lobby, shuttles, development clustering in less environmentally sensitive areas, and 20% conversion rate in offsite employee housing. Senmartin requested the increase be 25% instead of 20%. After a brief discussion, Senmartin made a motion to approve Item 4 with the 25% increase. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Items 5 and 6 were read together into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida Amending The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) From Residential Medium (RM) To Mixed Use Commercial (MU-C) For Property Described As Lots 1 Through 4 Of Block 6 And Lot 4 Of The Amended Plat Of Gulfstream Shores Of Marathon Plat 42 As Recorded In Plat Book 3-142, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100890-000000 And 00349440-000000; Providing For Severability; Providing For The Repeal Of Conflicting Provisions; Providing For The Transmittal Of This Ordinance To The State Department Of Economic Opportunity; And Providing For An Effective Date Upon The Approval Of This Ordinance By The State Department Of Economic Opportunity. -and- Item 6 An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon Florida Amending The Zoning From Residential Medium (RM) To Mixed Use (MU) For Property Described As Lots 1 Through 4 Of Block 6 And Lot 4 Of The Amended Plat Of Gulfstream Shores Of Marathon Plat 42 As Recorded In Plat Book 3-142, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100890-000000 And 00349440-000000; Providing For Severability; Providing For The Repeal Of Conflicting Provisions; Providing For The Transmittal Of This Ordinance Page 3 of 4 30 of 9(,3195 To The State Department Of Economic Opportunity; And Providing For An Effective Date Upon The Approval Of This Ordinance By The State Department Of Economic Opportunity. Shea presented the items. The two items clean-up existing FLUM and Zoning designations adopted by the County, this will make the Kirk of the Keys property entirely Mixed-Use. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 5. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 6. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Motion and second to adjourn at 6:59 pm. ATTEST: Matt Sexton-Planning Commissioner Chair ATTEST: Brian Shea-Planning Director Audio-Video is available upon request. Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes,if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such hearing or meeting, one will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made; such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ADA Assistance: Anyone needing special assistance at the Planning Commission Meeting due to disability should contact the City of Marathon at(305-)743-0033 at least two days prior thereto. (Please note that one or more Marathon City Council members may participate in the meeting.) Page 4 of 4 31 of 9(,3196 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT w Meeting Date: November 20, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Erin Dafoe, Associate Planner Agenda Item: Consideration Of A Request For A Conditional Use Permit For Scott Ebert Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations (Code) Entitled "Conditional Use Permits" For Unification of two residential units into a single family residential until with 11 bedroom and 11 bathrooms;Located at 574 Sombrero Beach Road; Which Is Legally Described As Block 2(bottom floor) Southerly and Northernly(top floor)part of Lot 17, Sombrero Beach Village Boot Key P135-86, Monroe County, Florida; Having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100, Nearest Mile Marker 50 APPLICANT/OWNER: Scott Ebert AGENT: Chad Neller LOCATION: The project site is located on two parcels at 574 Sombrero Beach Road, nearest mile marker 50. See Figure 1. Figure 1 Project Site i i >> fnu ✓ i (' ! / v.-..✓`awn .. VneS f ae. o00 ,�„✓1 0 ,,, W 120 180 2,10 00355110-000000 CU 1 32 of 9C3197 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Approval for development of the subject properties having the real estate numbers 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100 to combine two residential units into one single family 11 bedroom, 11 bathroom unit. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Medium (RM). Figure 2: Future Land Use Map WN %'%/ r f r �!P ��ir/ �' r ��� aE�ln>rux�m�� Baku�0�1�////✓ I, i G ab VE i�1 �� �i 1�, 1 , �yi➢' 1rlN u��� YARN'.T11 tll/�/ 7 �J �� ih.� 4 M °6 ! 1/� r`� /10 R av, "oF V ae o Div oonaoo / 0 30 GO '110 180 210 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Medium (RM). See Figure 3. Figure 3: Zoning Map ta N Al 1 A Ir/ IaxilY " meµ fi �Kt OF o 120 eo 0 00355110-000000 CU 2 33 of 9(,3198 LOT SIZE: Total acreage: 0.19 acres or 8,430 sq feet including both parcels. SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: Zoning Use North Residential Medium Single family residential East N/A Canal South Residential Medium Single family residential West Residential High Single family residential and The Schooner Condos EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project site consists of two parcels having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100. These parcels currently contain a duplex consisting of a four-bedroom and six-bedroom residential units. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT: Residential Units: One residential unit with 11 bedrooms and 11 baths. BACKGROUND: The proposed project is the unification of two residential units into one single family residential unit with more than six bedrooms in the Residential medium zoning classification. This report addresses the Conditional Use application.All conditions of the Conditional Use Permit approval will have to be met before any building permit will be approved. See Attachment A. EVALUATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: The criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Approval are outlined in Chapter 102, Article 13, Conditional Use Permits, in the City of Marathon Land Development Regulations. CRITERIA A. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and LDRs; The proposed redevelopment project is located within the Residential Medium(RM)Zoning District. Per Chapter 103, Article 2, Section 103.12 of the Land Development Regulations, the district is designed to"is intended to establish areas of low-to medium-density residential uses characterized principally by single-family detached and two-family dwellings,designated within the Residential Medium (RM) future land use category on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)." The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of an existing residential use and is consistent with the Residential Medium District. Section 103.15 establishes whether specific uses are allowed as of right, limited, accessory or conditional uses, through Table 103.15.2. That table shows that single single-family dwellings of 7 bedrooms or more are allowed as Conditional Uses in the RM 00355110-000000 CU 3 34 of 9(,3199 district. Conditional Use review is intended to allow a broader view of the potential impacts of a project on adjacent uses and on City concurrency related resources such as road capacity, solid waste, sewer, and potable water availability. Table 103.15.2 in the Land Development Regulations establishes constraints on density and intensity allowed in the RM district based on the types of uses proposed. The project as proposed meets the basic definition of development in the RM zoning district and meets the density constraints imposed on the type of proposed use. B. The proposed use is compatible with the existing land use pattern and future uses designated by the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed project is located within the Residential Medium Future Land Use District.Policy 1- 3.1.4 of the City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan states that the"principal purpose of the Residential Medium future land use category is to provide for medium-density single-family, residential development. The Residential Medium future land use category is characterized by predominantly compact development on lots with disturbed or scarified vegetation and areas that are appropriate for infill development and that are served by existing infrastructure." The proposed project will unify the existing duplex into one single-family dwelling with 11 bedrooms and 11 bathrooms. Existing land use patterns are residential to the north,west and south and a canal east of the property. C. The proposed use shall not adversely affect the health,safety,and welfare of the public; The proposed use is a continuation of residential use which has not had any known impact to the health, safety and welfare of the public. No new impacts are expected to arise from the proposed conditional use. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. D. The proposed conditional use minimizes environmental impacts, including but not limited to water,air,stormwater management,wildlife,vegetation,wetlands,and the natural functioning of the environment; The subject area contains no area recognized as possible habitat for a state or federally listed animal species. Stormwater management improvements were completed as part of recent permitting. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. E. Satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been made concerning the following matters,where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive, bicycle, and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in cases of fire or catastrophe; Ingress and egress to the property is being provided through the current access driveway onto Sombrero Beach Rd. A Traffic Study was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. The proposed plan is projected to have a decrease of daily vehicles trips compared to the existing duplex on site. 00355110-000000 CU 4 35 of 9(,3200 Table 1 574 Im5nibrera Brach Road Irip(kmrralicin sanlnhan Marathim,Ficifrielm DAY AM Peak Dour lripups I'M Peak HourTrips Laud Usc "An '1'61. In Out Wall In 0,ull I Total L-TiviFiR N1 L Ififamily I Hy,)using( cm- Ise) 211 N 12 0 1 1 E 0 1 Detached [knising I D4 91 0 1 1 E 0 1 I I�fferencc(P'rapo%ed-ExiMing) 13) 1) 0 (1, r 1) 0 0 Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required,with particular attention to item 1 above; Section 104.51.1. The City will require a minimum of one (1)parking space per bedroom unless otherwise justified and validated by the Conditional Use Permit applicant. The proposed 11-bedroom single family dwelling will require eleven (11)parking spaces. As the property sits now there is not enough space for the required amount of parking. The applicant proposes a maximum of 6 vehicles and I boat trailer parking spaces on site per their vacation rental agreement. See Attachment B. The current property as a duplex with 4 and 6 bedrooms only requires two (2)parking spaces per unit for a total of four(4) required. Therefore, the request with conditions is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 3. The noise, glare, or odor effects of the conditional use on surrounding properties; The proposed use consists of continuation of current residential use. The proposed residential use will not change current setbacks from neighboring property owners. Therefore,the proposed project should not have any adverse effect through noise, glare, or odors. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. 4. Refuse and service areas,with particular reference to locations,screening,and Items 1 and 2 above; The proposed use will not refuse collection locations. Garbage is collected through cans with Marathon Garage Service. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. 00355110-000000 CU 5 36 of 9(,3201 5. Utilities,with reference to location and availability; Chapter 107, Article 13, establishes the City's Concurrency Management and certification requirements. This Conditional Use constitutes the City's Concurrency Level of Service Certificate, as follows: • Wastewater: The applicant provided flow calculations and will be assessed a fee of $2,981.54 based upon the increased flows. • Water: The Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority already provides potable water for the duplex. • Solid Waste: Marathon Garbage Service already provides solid waste disposal. • Surface Water: The applicant has provided stormwater design information suitable for the Conditional Use application review which demonstrates compliance with City standards. A final stormwater plan has been completed through recent permits. • Recreation and Open Space: This development will have a de minimus impact on recreation and open space. • Roadways: The applicant is developing the site with a lower density than was contained within the duplex; however, a traffic analysis was completed to analyze the impact on transportation facilities finding it will have a reduction in traffic. • Educational Facilities: This redevelopment will have a de minimus impact on educational facilities since existing uses are replaced in kind. Section 104.51.1. specifies that "Residences with seven (7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly." Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 6. Screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions, and character; The proposed conditional use will not alter the current screening,buffering,dimensions,or character of the property. Code states that one canopy tree is required for every 50 feet of linear street frontage. The property already fulfills this requirement. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 7. Signs,if any,and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare,traffic safety and compatibility with surrounding uses; No additional signage or exterior lighting is proposed to the property. 8. Required yards and other open space; Table 106.16.1 specifies that property classified as Class III, developed. Which has is a minimum 20% open space requirement. Open space ratios were maintained and verified as part of the renovation permits. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 00355110-000000 CU 6 37 of 9(,3202 9. General compatibility with surrounding properties; The proposed use is residential. Adjacent uses include single family residential dwelling units. The proposed use is compatible with these nearby structures in terms of appearance and footprints. The use will not change the current appearance or footprint. With the ability to vacation rent a unit at two people per bedroom,plus an additional two,this could amount to 24 people overnight for the duplex. As the 11-bedroom single-family under the same regulations, the same 24 people overnight is achieved. The property currently has a vacation rental license for both units (VACA-23-288 and VACA-23- 385). By appropriately conditioning the approval, City Council has the ability to ensure a level of compliance with community character that is not achievable with projects permitted as of right. 10. Any special requirements set forth in the LDRs for the particular use involved. Existing residential use to remain residential. Section 104.51.1. entitled Single-family dwellings (7 Bedrooms or more)requires the following conditions. 1. Wastewater Flow Calculations. a. Residences with six (6) six bedrooms or less will be assumed to equate to one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) at 167 gallons per day. System development and connection charges, as well as monthly base and flow charges will accrue and be billed as a single-family residence. b. Residences with seven (7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly. 2. The City will require a minimum of one (1) parking space per bedroom unless otherwise justified and validated by the Conditional Use Permit applicant. 3. A Traffic Study was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. The proposed plan is projected to have a decrease of daily vehicles trips compared to the existing duplex on site. As stated in Section E 2.the applicant will require per their vacation rental agreement that there is a maximum of 6 vehicles and 1 boat trailer which must be parked in the driveway only. Therefore, with the above requirements,the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. CONCLUSION: 00355110-000000 CU 7 38 of 9(,3203 The Conditional Use Approval is intended to allow for the integration of certain land uses and structures within the City of Marathon based on conditions imposed by the Council.Review is based primarily on compatibility of the use with its proposed location and with surrounding land uses. Conditional uses shall not be allowed where the conditional use would create a nuisance, traffic congestion, a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use permit application based on the proposed use of an 11-bedroom and 11-bathroom single family dwelling with specific conditions to ensure community character. Conditions and Limitations of Approval • Must meet NFPA1, NFPA 101 and NFPA 58 requirements. • The applicant will obtain City approval for wastewater management through the City's Wastewater Utility;Residences with seven(7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly. • Parking to be a maximum of 6 vehicles and 1 boat trailer must maintained on the property and not in the ROW at any time. • The Conditional Use Development Order will constitute the Certificate of Concurrency for the project. The determination will be valid for one year. • A unity of Title will be required as part of single-family conversion. 00355110-000000 CU 8 39 of 9(,3204 LO 0 a N M f31 sm o _ 0 CD o° m .. oo Qom 5oGi odic <o 00 0O[ �s 00 „0'p oI 1 R w o �o ml.�' W ,- - ,bff \ spa Mfl � i og° Qo 0 N ^'�;NjJ df� mLL�� '�m000 �mao yO[FI )Ofl S> _ oF!TIIflCI ONno 1 n— V� Q� 90 cA �� o�� ` -/O. �,� � �`' ov AVManla 1-7Atr<I9 y oti � mo . O �. � � o; nnv�,aid i � -- I �- � � it �.1iNvid a�d2 e ti cz �d6ZM(IN, o�rwa t � tivM�ni�a iJnt�:y ,o u�— s, _ izer�iaNs wxd» r00(101. { re�fli��is (D �cc o i of:p c 00 u <'2 o .., 5 aa1�r»�o - o'os <�l 1 0,r vi U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O (D C) CN t cu Z�, Q Q,Q k t� u EE 0 75 Q, U U:l 0 IT, r-4 cn cz u N cn Li� Z —u —u u u u u u > > > F4 cz 4." cz 9:1 0 - -do 0 O Ca Cld O 2f iO O O O O O O v�4kpqX+ A e CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9805 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305-289-4121 Planning@ci.marathon.fl.us *"*"Discussion its.to for o n daY;,,,,N�����u��m .„ 2 �,,,�„ ITEMFOR PUBLIC MEETING: Applications for Florida Department of Transportation "Transportation Alternatives Grant Program"for fiscal year 2030. A public meeting regarding the Transportation Alternative (TA) Grant Applications that are being considered for submission on December 6, 2023. A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act(IRA) [§11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C) 133(h)j. This year the City of Marathon will be submitting three grant applications for consideration: 1. Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Trail/Turn-Around 2. Installation ofPath Lighting along Coco Plum Trail 3. Grassy Key Birding Boardwalk Trail Phase I Strengthening our economy by enhancing traveling experiences throughout communities, TA also funds cultural, historical, and environmental aspects of transportation infrastructure including construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas; historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities; vegetation management in transportation rights-of-way; archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects; and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity. 42 of 9(,3207 00 40 /D C14 4-� )QC 5::� • r---4�> CId 4-j 0 C75 4—j 0 LLJ cy-) Q) z � c-,i 4-j 0 0 Q) z CI\j Q) 0 ry, 0 p < C,\j rmmmq c co �E C�� LLJ Li- cd � C\j 0 0 u W 4—j > C� u 0 Q) O < rT cd �-4 C\j F—I C) C\j aglow, "itm" "low" 491OW OVOID,," moo, n 4aw, AMP 41WI- qdlbelt." 4mv/;, 4ftkIII rn 0 N M W Cl� O Q O z z m m n � Q cn z >- O LJ U � ct od U = z Q � J O m z 0 � O Q U � U J z � O cn J z Q • Un w > 0 � w 0 Q -1 � O U z0 O CL) z $� J O m � Q 0 m O M N j o O U uo -- i- 4-J U U co Q) 4-j 0� U 4-j ® 4-j U U 4-j 4-j `+- 4-j U < L x u ' u U d 4-J L+- t/�vy U 4-J (A `+- ±' (A _ U co u U 4-j 0) 0� U 4-j0) co co +-Jco co 4-j — s- vy • N VAMINAEP/1" 7f � / w „!»»»»!,»!»,1!»/��r!!r!!»»/�r»»!/!!/»»»»!»,1lrt�!»»!!»»»!!»!��»,!,»!„»,»,»„!,»»»!,»!„»��»»��,���»,»l,��l,�����»!,»!»»»�„lrt�!»»»!»��»!»»»»»!,»!»�1 a 8 M i a Q) 4-' M 4- , 4, a >_ U i- ; .— a C Q} , �- 4-J 0 � co j 0 cJ U a U 0 > Q) co a a _ Q) _ a f U � cn - --j a) a) vy a CO 4-j a) U U a a OL Q) o a a a x L- , U a U ' a a 4- 4-, 'J cn uo - —. 4-j a a) � a U co - 4-j a a Q) vy _ 0a x w U f a Q) s `+_ • • • V c i cld 4-j C') CL) O �,�� ��, � � ,�, �i�.,. N i� ,'� M �K y ��� (� ��' Y' (�6i U ��� ', � �1 � I fj �I'///� rn, � �'�/ /� r F r, t� u� ;I ,, � , r�` " L�fUI, ley, ��,:<. >>', ,A�, u , �� 1 u�Ni; i � r ui ��� �.��' '�:. �:.� �� � ;1 �� � t; �e� r. � �� ��:; `�: � r °�,,nr ,,; ���� �,, � J w.� 'i y r.;... �, � �'� �� t4��: � � � Y � N W Yjr+ //� ���� � r� �iio1,� `I H � ii It y�� � �� Y i i � � �. M �r � � ' 2,, i � i�f4 t � d '� N�NYlY4NVI�bUSV �� i� ,� l Ulna '� w� �, 7�'��r �� � '�" m' �� v i t �: �„ �i ti��, �„� �y� - , �,,� �� 4 , ( lYJ9//�� .l i�ap �,�,'I,,�'. /, id,,, b y�y� %� y p� � � v �� � J o ry , 3 J � / K,, pfijG,5 l �� �A �� s �%� �t �,,,; , �i.. ���r i ,, ,,� �. �, fl I' "ii�„ � I �/ � k1 � � �,�' i ��4u1� Y1���!uh9 �i f Mkt B11VA@40�Y�N IIVIIW�'�'� N'�Wi�"�;5�91�rrMIlU1N11�, �(64i�,tiM14�111A@11USUWl�I I$}I�,GIII � I �« S yQ0 �1�ti. C U J � I l�a �� �"ql� 11pp�� Q) c Lf) -o >) _ -o 4- Q) 5 _Lf) -o c s c7 O 'n O u s C O -C C C .� Q) U CV O co C J C C C O M ro o u U 0co o Ln U C :.0 r0 r0 Q) ° CL °C' ro s U ° ° 4� � D E c7 Q O 0 E ° _ 4- Q) 0 CL T co � d Q) c Q) CL s - Q) "- CL Ln ul co ° co D- ° u 3 U O Q 'n CL c co r- co CL _ s CO c s C 0) v r'n0 -C v) Q) O -v) -C '_' _C v 01 CL C 0 u C Q) ' o O U co U 4- R3 1 _c c O v)Co c C - c Q) 0 O ro �° C U O C ; C 0) U O 4- Co CL ° '-' Q) 0) '-' Co U -S Co s 0) �Co v) 0 C -C E N O _- Co QJ C O � Q) ..0 r0 0 -4 U- ro CL D ro -d C -d C U f0 °1 O ..0 ..0 Q) C Q) � s✓ v) O Q O _C_ c co -4-' 0 0 s 0 p O ° s Lf) C7 5 -0 c CO v) Ol Q O E S 01 C CL C 0 C CO1 ° Q) D 0 4— -C CLC Q) C ° CV) O S CL C EO 0 ° U o° C c CO s 4' C C O0 0 0 { U C E — °) ..� s CL dj � — O -(0 -� U U C�co _ N N C Co C Q) Q) C -4-, C CL CL ri C V o C r D- � � � �-, C � s Q) E � � C ro 01 C CL � Q) O 0 S ro ro -4-, v) 4{- U Co � 4� r0 C --o - -4-, Q 0 ° o C c) cL o CL ro ° o� Q) ro D- vO -`-`) '�_' -C CL CL -4-' ro Q) co -4-, �C o) Q) Q) '-' C 4- Q) s � 3 � ° o -0 u 4- c) o) o U C C ro - O C C � u o v o 0 0 u C o ro 0) u U N 'n -C s✓ Q) '� .0 - CL Q) � s -i i CU -C)Q) 0rc ro -C -4-, Lf) Q v) o - E - °U o Q) c E c D o ; C c E ro -0 s D CL coo c o o v) ccoo c Q) co -� U) w D- U I ,a � � f IIII 1 , I III sr y a. 1 { r r /G II J 6 y� y u: f fi 1,r; � a i iii i' r g � N N ' �a, � ��� 1 �' �� 'Y�y <i �i � �� 7 ��� m� P �� 1 � � � � i r � ,� �; PP11� r a �I�r9f ;�l%/ 1 ) 5i � � k I fi �' Il� b 1 1 f J � �/� ail °� J G ++II'��' V p. �� � � i� J � �h I 'c��� � W. ��/' �YI � N'. r f rypy n //1 a � �, �' >�� Nf ��f� ir; � �� �, �r �J !- r` i it ��-, u6�1� ,� 1 � �� '!k4 �Ul '��„ �� b) v+� ^�„� �� 1 � t,n � � ��� � � j �� � � ��'� �r � " �Dili ,�d�, i a� +�� r � ��, i �o is �° 4, ���,� � � �, j +� 9' � �� i � �� �� � � � ��' ��, ���� t �� y ����� �, , �, � �, �, �d +E `�� l �b � ,1 � �� ��;i d� ,, �i , 1 "� V !i �� a �,, � �y� ;r,� � I � � l �� � ����� j r J/ � � r�, �, i� �� �� �� 7,i �� 1 �bY �f i f A ��' �, U, Irf w� �� h �' � i 1; r �� a �al� cf„� „i uu � �h' i v I�i r: i4� 1 �r I � *' i r, i '9 q'x M r 6 ` r I et t r 'IN If U r r , t t m % / fff l� %PAII V ff� N N N M i i +�1 l� O cld November 28, 2023 �° Y(rA 1jk Florida Department of Transportation Maralkon Transportation Alternatives Grant Committee IP (dti:: tril � r 605 Suwannee St. Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: City of Marathon Coco Plum Dr Projects Dear Selection Committee, The Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce is committed to both our business and individual communities. We not only promote the City as a destination for visitors, but also to those who would like to become residents, open and/or relocate business (es); as well as engage in initiatives and programs that will support, benefit, and empower our business community. This letter is to express support from the Chamber for the City of Marathon's application to fund the completion of the multi-use path on Coco Plum Drive and add lighting to the path. This path was started in 2008 with the last section being completed in 2014. Many visitors and residents use the existing path but are forced to walk on the road to complete the "loop" of Coco Plum Drive. The addition of lighting along Coco Plum Drive has been long needed. With Coco Plum Beach being a turtle nesting beach, turtle friendly lighting in this area is essential. Lighting will enhance the neighborhood and bring added safety to what is a very popular walking/biking bath. Completion of the multi-use path and the added lighting will ensure the safety of cyclists and pedestrians and will be of great benefit to our community. I appreciate your attention to this letter, and I am hopeful to see this project move forward. Sincerely, � �y Daniel Samess, M.S. Chief Executive Officer Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce ceo@floridakevsmarathon.com (305) 289-5848 12222 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY-d'v1ARAH-fopq,FLORiDA KExs 33050-(305) 743-6417-FAX(305)289-0183 4(800)262 7284 E-mail:visitus@ FlcrridaKaysMarathon.core-www.RoridaKeysMarattromc o n 59 of 9(,3224 City of Marathon Planning Department 9805 Overseas Highway Marathon, FL 33050 Michele Safos 150 Coco Plum Dr. Slip #19 Marathon, FL 33050 November 20, 2023 Dear Mr. Shea, I am writing to express my support for an extension to the bike path on Coco Plum Drive. My elderly husband and I use the path almost daily in an effort to catch the sunrise at the end of Coco Plum. It would be wonderful if this bike path could be extended and low level lighting be added along the way. Navigation is scary after the bike path ends and will be more dangerous as the tourists begin to arrive. Thank you for this consideration. I feel certain it will be beneficial for all those who enjoy this path. Kindest Regards, Dionisios Safos Michele Safos 60 of 9(,3225 Marde and Stanley Jobe 125 Coco Plum Drive Darathon, Florida 33050 To: Florida Department of Transportation Re: In support of City of Marathon grant applications for the extension of the walking path and path lights Dear Sirs and Madams: I am writing this letter in support of the extension of the walking and bicycle path and the installation of lights on Coco Plum Drive in Marathon, Florida. It is my understanding the City of Marathon is applying for grants for the funding of these related projects. My husband and I own a family home on Coco Plum Drive and we own and operate a small local business as well with 4 full time employees. Our family and employees use the walking/biking path on Coco Plum Drive often and enjoy the outdoor space and activities. Coco Plum Drive is a dead end street with a cul de sac that ends at the ocean. The problem for walking and biking is that the current path does not extend to the end of the street. It stops randomly in the middle. Thus, if a person wants to go to the end for exercise and ocean viewing, whether walking or biking,you are in the street for a good portion of the way. It is unsafe and hazardous to walkers and bikers and motorists. Coco Plum Drive does not have paved shoulders and the lanes are very narrow. Therefore, the path is very important to the safety of everyone on the street regardless of their mode of travel. The Jobe family requests that the Department approve the City of Marathon's funding and grant requests for these important Coco Plum safety projects. Sincerely, Martie Jobe 61 of 9(,3226 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Path Extension and Upgrades Bgpg[! I['Hs lf.niaHl Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Cheryl Miller<clmiller509@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 6:04 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: savecocoplum@aol.com Subject: Coco Plum Bike Path Extension and Upgrades Dear Mr. Brian Shea, I live at 95 Coco Plum Drive, Unit 5A, in the City of Marathon, and I am writing to express my support for the City of Marathon's efforts to extend the Coco Plum Drive bike path to the end of the road.This will increase the safety of the cyclists, walkers and runners who all travel along Coco Plum Drive. In an effort to further increase safety, I encourage the City to add (nesting-turtle-friendly) lighting to the path and add a curb or ballasts along the road to prevent vehicles from driving onto the bike path. Vehicles entering the bike path is a particular concern at the 90 degree bend of Coco Plum Drive between Pescayo Avenue and Avenue C. As the Coco Plum population continues to grow with nearly 200 residential dwellings just added (single family homes on Pescayo Avenue and Avenue D) or under construction (Seaview Commons I and 11),the vehicular traffic on Coco Plum Drive will increase. Now is the time to extend and improve the Coco Plum bike path, ensuring safety of current and future residents. Sincerely, Cheryl Miller pop i 62 of 9C3227 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:57 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum improvements I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Kim Kenney<kim.d.ken ney@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:53 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: Kim Kenney<kimdkenney@gmail.com> Subject: Coco Plum improvements Dear Brian, I am writing on behalf of my mother who owns a townhome and two slips at Bonefish. My parents have been owners since the development began and as such we have spent a lot of time as a family in Marathon and Coco Plum. Prior to owning at Bonefish we stayed on Key Colony. Suffice it to say the area is special to our family. My mom is in poor health so I am managing the properties and her correspondence as her POA.As such, I would like to express support for the proposed extension of the bike trail and low lighting along Coco Plum drive. We walk and bike this area regularly when in town and have often commented how nice it would be to have sidewalk the whole way down as well as subtle lighting. I believe such a project would enhance property values and more importantly he an important safety improvement. I hope it moves forward. Sincerely, Kimberly Kenney agent under POA for Sue F. Dickes 96 Avenue C#1 Marathon i 63 of 9(,3228 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:51 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Trail Extension I['Ns lf.:i iai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°II�ghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: MARGARET WRIGHT<dsmkeys@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 1:56 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Bike Trail Extension We have been waiting a long time for the completion of the Bike Trail on Coco Plum Drive. This is a lovely walk/ride to the end, but, at this time, it isn't safe because of lack of lighting and the drop off on each side of the road. It will be wonderful to have a safe path. Thank you for your efforts to make this happen for both the residents and visitors to Coco Plum. Dee Wright 130 Coco Plum Drive Marathon, FL 1 64 of 9(,3229 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Drive bike path extension and lighting Bgpg[! I['Ns lf.niap l Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°II�ghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From:gacourter@comcast.net<gacourter@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:39 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Drive bike path extension and lighting Hello Brian, We are excited that an extension to the Coco Plum bike path and installation of turtle-safe lighting are being considered for grant requests! As Ave D residents, we use the bike path daily, especially when walking our dog. It's a lovely path, used by residents and vacationers alike, and extending it to the end of the drive would be fantastic! Aside from the enjoyment factor, it is almost a necessary improvement. Unfortunately, Coco Plum Drive has become somewhat of a speedway and an extension of the bike path should be considered a necessary safety improvement. Likewise, lighting should also be considered a critical and necessary safety improvement, especially needed during the winter months due to the early sunset time. We truly hope these projects will be eligible for grants and thank you for your efforts on behalf of our lovely community! Bet regards, Gail &Glenn Courter 1 65 of 9(,3230 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:58 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Improvement of Coco Plum walking trail I['Ns if.:i i ai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°II�ghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From:Woody Hodgkins<woodyhog@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 16, 2023 9:29 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Improvement of Coco Plum walking trail I wholeheartedly support the plan to improve the walking/biking trail on Coco Plum Drive. Many of our guests and residents make that walk a part of their daily exercise routine. i 66 of 9(,3231 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:57 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Trail extension and Lighting I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Pamela Mayberry<pam.mayberry@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:55 AM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Fwd:Trail extension and Lighting ---------- Forwarded message--------- From: Pamela Mayberry<pam.mayberry@gmail.com> Date:Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:45 AM Subject:Trail extension and Lighting To: Lynda &Jack Berrigan <Savecocoplum@aol.com> Dear Lynda, Wade and I enthusiastically support the efforts to fund the extension of the bike/walk Trail to the end of CoCo Plum Drive and the addition of lighting. Many of CoCo Plum residents have continually asked why it was never taken to the Point and we have brought it up at several annual Save CoCo Plum meetings. With all the additional development on CoCo Plum,this trail's popularity will continue to grow and therefore increase the potential for incidents as there will be more people walking, biking and driving on the road past the current ending of the trail to the end of CoCo Plum for the magnificent view. And since evening time is typically cooler, lighting will also help alleviate someone being hit at dusk. I would also like to point out that the destruction from Huricane Irma (9/2017)to the end of the CoCo Plum has still not been repaired. It would seem to me that this could also be included in the request to the FDOT, since much of the necessary equipment will already be on sight. i 67 of 9(,3232 Thank you for your continued support for the residents of CoCo Plum. Pam &Wade Mayberry 2 68 of 9C3233 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:58 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Attachments: Gold team logo.pdf Ilw, ;g fp.Ej.....F.I�.�.s....If.nC!ia� Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°II�ghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...1:L:L2 f sheab@ J.marathon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fLus From:Jacqueline Adorno <jadorno@comcast.net> Sent:Thursday, November 16, 2023 12:22 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: lynda Marathon Coco Plum Association <savecocoplum@aol.com> Subject: Coco Plum Brian Shea, I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to bring your attention to a project that aims to enhance the quality of life in our neighborhood by finishing the sidewalks that will allow residents to fully enjoy the natural beauty that surrounds us. Our neighborhood is blessed with an abundance of nature. It is a haven for those seeking solace in the great outdoors, and a place where families come together to create lasting memories. However, the lack of proper sidewalks poses a significant challenge for residents who wish to explore and appreciate the natural wonders that lie just beyond their doorsteps. By investing in the creation of finishing the sidewalks,we can provide a safe and accessible pathway for residents of all ages to immerse themselves in the beauty of our neighborhood.These sidewalks will not only encourage physical activity and promote a healthier lifestyle but will also foster a sense of community and connection among our residents. The benefits of this project extend far beyond mere convenience. With the finishing of sidewalks, we will witness an increase in foot traffic, leading to a stronger sense of security and a decrease in crime rates. Additionally, the sidewalks will provide a safer route for children to walk to school, reducing the reliance on cars and promoting sustainable transportation. 1 69 of 9(,3234 We understand that funding such a project requires a significant investment, but we believe that the long-term benefits far outweigh the initial costs. We have already secured support from local businesses, community organizations, and residents who are eager to contribute their time and resources to make this vision a reality. In conclusion, we kindly request your consideration for a grant to fund the creation of new sidewalks in our neighborhood. We firmly believe that this project will not only enhance the quality of life for our residents but also serve as a model for other communities looking to prioritize nature and promote a healthier lifestyle. Thank you for your time and consideration. We eagerly await your positive response and the opportunity to work together in transforming our neighborhood into a haven for walking enjoyment. Sincerely, Resident of 112 Avenue E Marathon Florida 33050 Jacqueline Adorno REALTOR iadorno@comcast.net Long and Foster Real Estate 1109 E Baltimore Pike Suite E Media, Pa. 19063 Tri County Suburban Realtors Association Realtor Lic#RS293281 Also licensed in NJ#2190990 (office) 610-892-8300 (cell) 610-662-0556 Accredited Designations ABR SFR ALHS SRS .https:Hvimeo.com/259032849 ALIU t ,e d'L Home�Nli� u�i�i h 5�peAalllsi ALERT! Long &Foster Real Estate will never send you wiring information via email or request that you send us personal financial information by email. If you receive an email message like this concerning any transaction involving Long &Foster Real Estate, do not respond to the email and immediately contact your agent via phone. The contents of this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this message or any attachment by you is strictly prohibited. If you 2 70 of K3235 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:02 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Extension of Bike Path and low level lighting Coco Plum Attachments: New Bike Path Coco Plum.docx Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°Hghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203... :L:L2 f sheab@ J.marafhon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Michele Safos<michelesafos@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 2:21 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Extension of Bike Path and low level lighting Coco Plum Good afternoon, Mr Shea, I am attaching a letter of support from my husband and me for the support of the bike path. We are daily users. I do not have the technology to print and sign this, but let me know if this is not acceptable and I will find a way to get the signatures added. Kindest regards, Michele Safos i 71 of 9(,3236 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:33 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: FDOT Grant I['Ns lf.:i iai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°II�ghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Eric Viehman <Vman1098NR@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 9:24 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: Lynda Berrigan <savecocoplum@aol.com> Subject: FDOT Grant Sea n, It has come to my attention that you are looking for support regarding your grant application with FDOT to extend the bike path on Coco Plum Dr to the end. I have advocated for this extension for 20 yrs as that is when my wife and I retired and moved to Coco Plum. We are walkers and have walked Coco Plum Dr to the end daily for years. Our walks would last for about an hour as we often would take in the ocean view while sitting on the park bench. Need a few more benches by the way. On busy days we have passed 30+ individuals walking to the end as well, some with children on bikes. The bike path extension would create a safer zone for walkers, bikers and joggers. I also like your lighting idea as well. Any improvements are welcome. I have been a cheerleader regarding the beautification of the median areas on Over Seas Highway, the boat ramp/parking next to the Island and the bike path on Aviation Blvd. Looks great and I applaud the efforts the city has made in this area. I want to thank you for your attempt to secure this grant. Eric Viehman i 72 of 9(,3237 150 Coco Plum #16 Marathon, FL 33050 vmanl093nr@msn.com 2 73 of 9(,3238 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 1:04 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Letter in Support of Coco Plum Walking Path Grant Applications Attachments: November 2023 Letter in Support of City of Marthon Grants.docx Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°II�ghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...1:L:L2 f sheab@ J.marathon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Martie Jobe<martie@jobeco.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 12:34 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Letter in Support of Coco Plum Walking Path Grant Applications Brian: Thanks for meeting with us today. We really appreciate your time. Attached is a letter in support of the grants that the City is submitting for Coco Plum Drive. Have a Happy Thanksgiving! Martie Jobe 1 74 of 9(,3239 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 8:35 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Lighting coco plum bike path If1Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...289...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: sonya margiotta <samkeys09@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 6:38 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Lighting coco plum bike path I think that having lighting on the bike path would make it safer for everyone . I wholly support this idea. Sonya Margiotta 95 Coco plum dr Marathon, FI 1 75 of 9(,3240 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:15 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Project support Bgpg[! I['Hs lf.niaHl Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Rich Fuller<rfuller101@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:15 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Project support Hi Brian, I'm writing to let you know that we support the project to extend the bike trail to the end of Coco Plum Drive and we support adding lights to the existing trail and the new proposed extension.Thanks, We're the owners of Royal Plum unit 4 at 133 Coco Plum Drive. Pilch IFLullll&' 1727 460 5307 1 76 of 9(,3241 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:34 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: coco plum drive bike path If1Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°Hghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 303...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marafhon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Don Dubois<rosie20l43@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:06 AM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: coco plum drive bike path Dear Brian Shea, I agree the bath path and lighting should be completed as soon as possible for it has been a project way over due. I ride my bike every day and would enjoy the extension of the path to the roads end. Currently it is a dangerous piece of road with speeders and disrepair to the shoulders on both sides. Thankyou, Donald DuBois CPBYC, Slip 7 Ave I Marathon, FL> 1 77 of 9(,3242 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 2:08 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Trail and Lighting extension I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: dianemernal@gmail.com <dianemernal@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 12:42 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Bike Trail and Lighting extension Dear Mr. Shea: I am unable to attend the meeting tonight because I went to IL for the holidays. But I wanted you to know that I walk on Coco Plum Drive every day but only up to the point that the sidewalk ends. For safety reasons, I am not comfortable walking on the street. I would encourage you to apply for funding to extend the sidewalk and add lights down to the POINT. I feel this would be a real positive step for Coco Plum Drive. Lighting and sidewalks would be a vast improvement because the traffic is not heavily policed on Coco Plum the way it is in Key Colony Beach and the drivers do not obey the speed limit or other safety provisions. Sidewalks and lighting are sorely needed.Thank you.Also the website states the meeting for tonight is cancelled. What is that all about? Diane Merna Bonefish Towers-Apt. 401 2000 Coco Plum Drive Marathon, FL 33050 630-399-1380 1 78 of 9(,3243 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Bike path extension I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Olek Muszynski <Olek@eighthday.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 6:24 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Bike path extension I understand that the City is applying for grant to fund design and construction of bike path extension on Cocoplum. The purpose of this letter is to express our full support of this effort. Carol and I are full time residents of the Cocoplum subdivision and users of bike path . Extension will be an improvement to quality of life in the neighborhood as well as the safety of the residents as well as tourists. We would love to see the design of the extension to consider following items ; 1. Low amber path lights or no lights at all. As it is there is too ma y lights polluting night sky in the area. 2. Design improvement to the median between the path and the roadway. Current medians along Cocoplum are devastated by cars driving or parking over them. 3. Introduction of elevated path with balustrades ( kind you see in state and national parks constructed with pt lumber or trex) Perhaps solar power lights can be located under the top rails. Opportunity to introduce these elevated sections exists between Ave K and O in areas void of houses. Depth of City right of way at these blocks offers opportunity to make path more interesting by slightly curving it away from the roadway. 4. Much needed repairs of the road shoulder need to be budgeted in to this project. Shoulders washed out during Irma are in many places 12" lower than roadway with chunks of asphalt crumbling in accelerated pace. 5.Just in case the grant will end up excessively large Q- Long shot idea of routing elevated path through the wet land between the beach and Cocoplum . Olek snd Carol Muszynski 104 Avenue L 1 79 of 9(,3244 REQUIRED UIPLOAD., CONQUIRRIENICY P CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s),excerpt from comprehensive plan(s),transportation plan(s),capital improvement plan(s�, mana,gement p1lan(s),pdaritizahon lli:st,etc.). Please see following for Resolution: so of 9C 3245 Sponsored by: Puto CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA RESOLUTION 2008-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, AGREEING TO ADD THE COCO PLUM RECREATION TRAIL PROJECT TO THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IF THE CITY OF MARATHON IS AWARDED AN FY 2008 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT FOR THE PROJECT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (the "DEP") awards Recreational Trail Program Grants to build and improve recreation trails. WHEREAS, the City of Marathon (the "City") will submit a grant application to DEP to acquire funds to renovate the Coco Plum Recreation Trail. WHEREAS,the City has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to add the Coco Plum Recreation Trail Upgrade to its Five Year Capital Improvement Program if it is awarded a Fiscal Year 2008 Recreational Trails Program Grant for the project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein. Section 2. The City Council hereby agrees to add the Coco Plum Recreation Trail Upgrade to the City of Marathon Five Year Capital Improvement Program if the City is awarded a DEP Recreational Trail Program grant for the project. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 3246 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Marathon,Florida,this 25th day of March 2008. THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA �/I ew-7 Edward P. Worthington, Ma or AYES: Bull, Cinque, Tempest, Vasil, Worthington NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: 1aJ, y� Diane Clavier City Clerk (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY FOR THE USE AND RELIANCE OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA ONLY: City Attorney 3247 REQUIRED UIPILGAD for Infwastructure (not applitalbIle for Nl)- ENIVIROMM ENTAIL,CONDITIONS 5it PIPORTING DOCUIMENTAT10IN (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits,copy ofthe entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans,etc.). Current Conditions:The project is adjacent to low functioning salt marsh and buttonwood wetlands. Please see the following for a conditions map. Permits through outside agencies to be determined (ACOE, DEP, SFWMD). lIO a„ n. 83 of 9(,3248 REQUIRED UIPLOAD for Infrastructure (not appfloable for NII), OWNERSHIP I ROVI STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting We control)and related landowner supporting documentation.Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcell(s)comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there Is control of the project site(e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats,warranty deeds, prescriptions,certlified surveys,easements,use agreement,etc.).Malips,should clearly show the location of each ownership In relation to the project boundary and I or fimits. NOTE provide map documentation on 8,5"x 1111'scale. DO NOT provide iredurced coples of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. Ilf applicable,an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project,together with a spreadsheet proOdl�ng the tax Identification number(s)of each imparted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area,for each Impacted parcel. Please see following for Ownership/ROW Status: 84 of 9C 3249 VIU� �°�ONTY Monroe County, FL UNI2UE CU , t Overview Legend Major Roads v II u`^ I iy 1 Centerline Easements K,. wr Hooks Lot Lines Road Center Rights of Way Shoreline Key Names k �r f' r s I A,— Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Alternate ID 1449946 Owner Address CITY OF MARATHON Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Class RIGHT OF WAY 9805 Overseas Hwy Property Address VACANT LAND Marathon,FL 33050 MARATHON District 50CM Brief Tax Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P64-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC (11'^JoLP-1 II"JoL Lo Ibo a usod oii n IIrgalll docu uimcaii ft) Date created:11/29/2023 Last Data Uploaded:11/2 9/202 3 4:04:26 AM Developed bySchneider 85 of 9C3250 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Monroe County, FL Disclaimer The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office maintains data on property within the County solely for the purpose of fulfilling its responsibility to secure a just valuation for ad valorem tax purposes of all property within the County.The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office cannot guarantee its accuracy for any other purpose.Likewise,data provided regarding one tax year may not be applicable in prior or subsequent years.By requesting such data,you hereby understand and agree that the data is intended for ad valorem tax purposes only and should not be relied on for any other purpose. By continuing into this site you assert that you have read and agree to the above statement. Summary Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Account# 1449946 Property ID 1449946 MillageGroup 50CM Location Address VACANT LAND,MARATHON Legal Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P134-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC �aalaa:II'4W laa Ilya,w,ud ouii Ilu.a gall da cuilina.inil',r,J Neighborhood 10041 Property Class RIGHT OF WAY(9400) Subdivision Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Affordable Housing No Owner a:;Irlry;::�11 Irnlr fro-{;::�Ir ...................................................... 9805 Overseas Hwy Marathon FL 33050 Valuation 2023 Certified Values 2022 Certified Values 2021 Certified Values 2020 Certified Values + Market Improvement Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Misc Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Land Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Just Market Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Total Assessed Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 School Exempt Value ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) = School Taxable Value $0 $0 $0 $0 Historical Assessments Year Land Value Building Value Yard Item Value Just(Market)Value Assessed Value Exempt Value Taxable Value Maximum Portability 2022 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2021 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2020 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2019 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2018 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 Iic II`n1,�a;nlltrimruin I vane L;I llIIulu ir,iuiii ud luirinala oiiiIls uiiid°J-io.rd iniaal be i' 11iud rpnanru�lII lu iaaa.mlll Vpoiu Mb lIRy urino uiniL 4 oi[il ia: on WI icu Wvo.ufu lII iu H bmll Vpoiu MlLyoIIulu�irinoia iiL Land Land Use Number of Units Unit Type Frontage Depth (8600) 1.00 Lot 0 0 View Tax I nfo View axes'ftn LIhiis Ilaircell ......................................................... 3251 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 86 of 9(, „� 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Map 1 N I No data available for the following modules:Buildings,Yard Items,Sales,Permits,Sketches(click to enlarge),Photos,TRIM Notice. Schneider GCJ5 PAT IY4L U.Yr e it II°iriivyc 111 slIlia,v G I blFIR II°iri pa y Notice gsa,1 a pa p u�1i�il�p p� e��� aJ of 04 26A IV 3252 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 870 9( , Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside(TA) ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE Financial Management Number(if applicable): Project Description: Items TA Eligible Other Funds(must include all TA ineligible items) TOTAL Engineer's Engineer's Subtotal Engineer's Engineer's Subtotal Total Pay Item Number* Pay Item Descrl ption* Qua n[i[y Unit Unit Cost Cost(TA funds) Qua n[i[y Unl[ Unit Cost Cost(other funds) Sources)of Match Quantity Total Engineer's Cos[ 1 Engineering 1 ITS $80,000,00 $ 80,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 80,000,00 2 Bonds,nsurance,Taxes,Etc 1 ITS $35,000,00 $ 35,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 35,000,00 3 M.blllzati.n 1 ITS $50,000,00 $ 50,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 50,000,00 4 Clear&Grubb 1 ITS $40,000,00 $ 40,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 40,000,00 S Maintenance Of Traffic 1 ITS $ 18,00000 $ 18,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 18,000,00 6 Compacted Subgrage 3210 SY $ 6,00 $ 19,260.00 EA $ - 3210 $ 19,260,00 4"Llnerock Base 2890 SY $ 34,00 $ 98,260.00 EA $ - 2890 $ 98,260,00 8 1-1/4"Asphalt 2570 SY $ 22,00 $ 56,540.00 EA $ - 2570 $ 56,540,00 9 Slte Grading 1 ITS.$40,000,00 $ 40,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 40,000,00 10 Driveway Adjustments 11 EA$ 1,200,00 $ 13,200.00 EA $ - 11 $ 13,200,00 11 StdpmICC—t—lks 5 EA $ 80000 $ 4,00000 EA $ - 5 $ 4,000,00 12 Tactile Warning SVlps 7 EA $ 450,00 $ 3,150.00 EA $ - 7 $ 3,150,00 13 Electrical Conduit 2800 LF $ 27,00 $ 75,600.00 EA $ - 2800 $ 75,600,00 14 Electric C.nduclor 2800 LF $ 11,00 $ 30,800.00 EA $ - 2800 $ 30,800,00 15 Pedestrian Lighting Complete 36 EA$ 8,200,00 $ 295,200.00 EA $ - 36 $ 295,200.00 16 Pull Boxes 36 EA $ 450,00 $ 16,200.00 EA $ - 36 $ 16,200.00 17 Electrical Service Connection 1 EA $ 11,000,00 $ 11,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 11,000,00 18 Benches 4 EA $ 2,800,00 $ 11,200.00 EA $ - 4 $ 11,200,00 19 Trash Receptacles 4 EA$ 1,500,00 $ 6,000.00 EA $ - 4 $ 6,000,00 20 Concrete Pads for Benches 4 EA $ 600,00 $ 2,400.00 EA $ - 4 $ 2,400,00 21 Landscaping 1 ITS $80,000,00 $ 80,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 80,000,00 22 As Bul its 1 EA $ 18,000,00 $ 18,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 18,000,00 EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ TA Eligible Costs/TA Funds Requested Other Funds (not funded through he,sources) $ 1,003,830.00 (must include TA Ineligible Costs) $ Subtotal $ 1,003,810.00 Design Cost $ - CEI Cost $80,000 $ CONTINGENCY(REQUIRED) C—mgencV is not a FHWA Participating Item 15% $ Total Cost Estimate $ $ $ A reasonable estimate of project costs is required.Projects must follow appropriate design criteria and meet Americans with Dlsabl((ties Act requl rements.Projects on the State Highway System,and".n-system"(.0 FDOT land),and Critical Projects shall uUllze FDOT pay items umbers and descriptions FDOT'S AWARD OF FUNDING TO THE APPLICANT'S PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF PARTICIPATING VS.NON-PARTICIPATING ITEMS IDENTIFIED IN THIS COST ESTIMATE.Funding pay items and eligibility will be discussed during project development. 42758 Prepared by: PE Number: Examples of Non-participatingitems: Carlos A.Solis,P.E. 12b-23 Mow ng,litter removal,opt onal sery ces;vdeo'nspec[on;uTll[yd'rec[onal bore/utility agency owner d'rec[onal bores; jName: Signature: Date: Utility work,lncludng but not I!mlted to valveadjustments,utility relocations,power pole relocations, Contingency Il Reviewed by: Other elements maybe non-participating,the ones listed above are....particatiag commonly used pay items. IfV.0 have quest!.m regarding an eligible......particlpumig item,DI strict re presentatives ma y be c.n[a cted for gul dance. Name: Signature: Date: References: FDOT Design htt.s://www.fdoteov/roadway Environmental Management htt.s://www.fdot.z,ov/environment FDOT Est!mates hap, w.fdot.o ent estimates documents Local Programs Manual hap, —fd.t.. gent la la t.c.shtm TA Set-Aside Program htt s w.fd.t.o tannin ns astems s stems m ent to ss of 3253 REQUIRIED,UPLOAD for Infrastructure (rr t appiteable for I),Typical)Section(s)depicting existing and proposed features,dimensions,and ROW lines. If there are rnuNtipie segments,provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. Current Path Ending at Ave K: w. I➢ U 89 of SIC 3254 No path forces users to utilize the roadway: r /✓rf Pr r(r l r (r r rJ' ` J i l�flilliJs�r715'` ,iii/ir 11/10/1 r, r i" IlrHiilli 900 9C3255 o[ri e tioin PART 12 — PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS MU�ti L)Ge ����Iadq/Turin AroUind ~30_— ' VYitq �ightiing Additioin 2 12-22-23 Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases. schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FOOT does not a||ovv programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.0., ud|ib/ relocation). Chapter337.14. F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FOOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION~ 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project isdesignedorifthepr jecthasnotbeendesignedorisa N| project, provide adetai|ed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for de|iverab|e). Utilize the FOOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FOOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds b» the project. Note: Applications for NU Projects to skip to page 15.°°° 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I.E H.. E N go 0 E.0 0 0 AIIi Fal'.."M. Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) Preliminary Engineering Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) ���� TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES FDOT SET-ASIDE PROGRAM (TA) FUNDING APPLICATION A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) [§ 11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 133(h)]. District representatives may be contacted for guidance. PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Applicant Agency Sponsor Type. Select the box indicating the agency of the person who can answer questions about this project proposal. Then complete applicable text fields. Note: State-recognized non-profit agencies may partner with an eligible governmental entity but are not eligible as a direct grant recipient. Checkbox next to each of the following types of agencies that do not indicate text field. Document allows one selection. Local government (e.g., county, city, village, town, etc.). Regional transportation authority or transit agency. Natural resource or public land agency. School district, local education agency, or school (may include any public or nonprofit private school). Projects should benefit the public and not just a private entity. Recognized Tribal Government. Other local or regional governmental entity with oversight responsibility for transportation or recreational trails, consistent with the goals of 23 U.S.C. 133(h). Metropolitan /Transportation Planning Organization /Agency (collectively MPO) (only for urbanized areas with less than 200,000 population). FDOT (only by request of another eligible entity, then enter the requesting entity). If"checked", enter the requesting entity in the space provided. (Word limit 5) 2. Agency name of the applicant. (Word limit 5). 3. Agency contact person's name and title. (Word limit 5). 4. Agency contact person's telephone number and email address. (Word limit 5). 3257 PART 2 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM (LAP) CERTIFICATION LAP is FDOT's primary mechanism to provide governmental subrecipients with federal funds to develop transportation infrastructure facilities through cost-reimbursement (grant) agreements. This legal instrument (the grant agreement) will describe intergovernmental tasks to be accomplished and the funds to be reimbursed for selected projects. The FDOT Local Programs Manual and FDOT Procedure 525-010-300 provides details for local agencies to complete a certification process that is a risk-based assessment evaluating whether they have sufficient qualifications and abilities "to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work" for infrastructure projects. Non-profit organizations are not eligible for LAP certification, local agencies are not eligible for certification of Project Development and Environment (PD&E) or Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition phases. FDOT is required to provide oversight on fee-simple and less-than-fee ROW acquisition phases, including license agreements, encroachment agreements, perpetual easements, temporary construction easements, and donations. LAP Full Certification Provide: Approval Date: and Expiration Date: Responsible Charge Name: LAP Project Specific Certification Provide: Approval Date: Project FM(s) Number: Responsible Charge Name: Not LAP Certified —A LAP Certified Agency will deliver the project on behalf of the uncertified Agency. Provide: Sponsoring Contact Agency Name: Name: Address: Phone: Not LAP Certified - FDOT District will administer the project. Provide: FDOT Contact Name: Phone: Not LAP Certified —the Agency will become LAP certified 1 year prior to the delivery of the LAP project. Not Applicable—this is a Non — Infrastructure Project. 3258 1. Project Name /Title: (Word limit 15). 2. Is this a resubmittal of a previously unfunded project? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the year(s) of submittal(s) and include project title(s), if different, in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does this project connect a previously funded project(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the Financial Management (FM) number(s) and provide a brief description of the other related FDOT-funded phases that are complete, underway, or in the FDOT 5-year Work Program. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is funding requested for this same project from another source administered by FDOT? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate funding source(s) / application(s) submitted. NOTE: Contact your district representative to discuss if this same project is partially funded in the 5-year Work Program or if FDOT has received another application for funding it. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. What are you proposing in this application? In 200 words or less, provide a description of the project and what it will accomplish. The description should allow a person without prior knowledge of the project to clearly understand it. Summarize the purpose, need, project attributes, the relationship to surface transportation, how the project improves safety, and expected benefits. REQUIRED ® PROJECT INFORMATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including 1) Scope of Work clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired outcome; detailed description of the existing conditions; and detailed description of the proposed project and major work item improvements (e.g., project limits (begin / end), width of sidewalks or trails and other components, materials, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement markings, etc.). 2) Intent to enter into a cost reimbursement agreement for delivering the project. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the applicant is authorized to submit the proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations and maintenance of the improved facility, and compliance with all federal and state requirements. 3259 1. Indicate the municipality(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 2. Indicate the county(ies) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 3. Roadway Classification Yes No State roadway (on-system) Yes No Federal roadway Yes No Local roadway (off-system) 4. Indicate the roadway name(s) [including applicable state, federal, county road number(s), local roadway name, and roadway identification number(e.g., SR 5/ US 1 / CR 904/Overseas Highway/ ID number: 90040000)]. (Word limit 10). 5. Indicate the roadway beginning project limits (south or west termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 6. Indicate the roadway ending project limits (north or east termini), mile points, and crossroads at each end of each listed segment. (Word limit 10). 7. Indicate the total project length, in miles and linear feet. (Word limit 10). 8. Does the project involve the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail network? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the trailway identification number, beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 9. Within the next five years, are non-FDOT funds being expended within the limits or adjacent to the proposed project? If not, select "no" and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain. (Word limit 50). Yes No 3260 PART 5 - PROJECT TYPE NOTE: Certain areas may not be prioritizing Non-infrastructure (NI) proposals or all eligible infrastructure activities (or may recommend bundling activities together). Contact your district representative for guidance. IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIIIIIWIINJ IIWNMMM IIIIIIWIINJ IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ IRII@IIE IIMIMMI IIWNMMM II1111MA11 II1111MI@III IIMIMMI IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM IIWNMMM IIMIMMI IIIIIIWIINJ MUM IIIIIIull11H MUM IIWNMMM MUM IIWNMMM IIWNMMMM IIMIMMI IIWNMMMM II1111MI@III IIWNMMMM IIIIIIull11H IIMIMMI II1111MA11 IIIIIIWIINJ II1111MA11 IImmm IIWN!M!M IImmm IIWN!M!M 1. PROJECT CATEGORY Select one box that best represents the project proposal. Then, complete either the "Infrastructure" or "NI" selections. A. Infrastructure. If so, select "yes", B. Non-infrastructure (NI). If so, select "yes", then then select the most appropriate select the most appropriate NI eligible activity from "infrastructure" eligible activity from the listing following the Infrastructure activities. listing below. (Pages range 5-6) (Page range 7) 5-A. INFRASTRUCTURE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY Select one box that best represents the project proposal).As applicable, complete infrastructure eligible text fields. Pedestrian and / or Bicycle facilities (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of off-road trail facilities or on-road facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation). Safe Routes for Non-Drivers (Select this box for construction, planning, and design of infrastructure related projects and systems that provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs). Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails (Select this box for conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors into trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonmotorized transportation users). Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks (Select this box for construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways visible from the project or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Outdoor Advertising Management (Select this box for inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Historic Preservation and Rehabilitation of Historic Transportation Facilities (Select this box for historic preservation or rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities). If"yes", list any locally designated or National Register of Historic Places listed or eligible resources or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Vegetation Management (Select this box for vegetation management in public transportation ROW to improve roadway safety, prevent invasive species, and erosion control). If"yes", list any Florida Scenic Byways within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). 3261 Part 5-A Infrastructure Eligible Activity continued... m Archaeological Activities (Select this box for archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects funded by FHWA). If"yes", list the State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the archaeological site, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Stormwater Mitigation (Select this box for environmental mitigation activities addressing stormwater management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to transportation projects). Wildlife Management (Select this box for wildlife mitigation and reduction of wildlife mortality, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats). Boulevards (Select this box for boulevards, defined as a walkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfares in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These may be high ridership transit corridors; serve as primary goods movement and emergency response routes; and use vehicular and pedestrian access management techniques that promote economic revitalization and follow complete street principles]. If"yes", list any Florida Main Street communities or Florida Trail Towns within the project limits, or indicate N/A in text field. (Word limit 5). Recreational Trails Program [Select this box for recreational trails compliant with 62-S-2, Florida Administrative Code, and 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)]. If"yes", list the parks / recreational areas within the project limits, or indicate N/A in the text field. (Word limit 5). Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) [Select this box for SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208, that substantially improves the ability of kindergarten through 12th grade students (vulnerable road users) to walk and /or bicycle to school]. Traditionally includes sidewalks, traffic calming and speed reduction, traffic diversion improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossings, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle facilities, and bicycle parking facilities at public schools. If"yes", list the benefiting schools that are within two miles of the project limits; total student enrollment; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Other surface transportation eligible purpose (Only if within urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000). If"yes", list the eligible activity or indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 5). 3262 ® *** Note: For Infrastructure projects, skip this page.*** Select one box that represents the project proposal. Checkbox indicating NI eligible activity. Document allows one selection. Vulnerable road user safety assessment as defined by Section 316.027 (b), F.S. Workforce development, training and education activities that are eligible uses of TAP funds. SRTS projects, codified as 23 U.S.C. 208. This NI activity must be primarily based at the school and benefit students and /or their parents and have documented support from the school(s). If"yes", list the benefiting schools; total student enrollment and students served by project; approximate number of students living along the route; and the percentage of students eligible for reduced meal programs, or indicate N/A in space provided. (Word limit 10). NI COMPONENTS As applicable, insert the number of each type of proposed activity. Numerical field indicating total number NI program would provide. Number of walk or bicycle audits. Number of after school programs receiving / Number of bicycle skills /safety classes. pedestrian / bicycle safety instructioneducation. Number of pedestrian skills/ safety classes. Number of bicycle rodeos. Number of community demonstration projects. Number of pedestrian safety skills events. Number of community encouragement activities. Number of schools with walking school Number of community challenges. bus programs (defined as planned route Number of community workshops /stakeholder with meeting points, a timetable, and a meetings. schedule of trained volunteers). Number of classroom / educational classes Number of schools with bicycle train receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / programs (defined as a planned route education. with meeting points, a timetable, and a schedule of trained volunteers). Number of school assemblies receiving pedestrian / bicycle safety instruction / education. Number of student-led leadership initiatives (e.g., student patrols, peer-led Number of training sessions to implement the SRTS learning, etc.). program (e.g., training for volunteer walking school bus leaders, training for bicycle train leaders, etc.). 3263 PART 6 - AREA CONDITIONS Select applicable boxes describing the area and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Select one box that describes the geographic population size of the project area. Non-Urban Area with a population of 5,000 or less Urban Area with a population greater than 5,000 but no more than 50,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 50,000 but no more than 200,000 Urban Area with a population greater than 200,000 2. Is the project within the boundary of an MPO*? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the MPO in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Is the project within the boundary of a Transportation Management Area (TMA)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the TMA in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Is the project within a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) community or designated as a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) as defined pursuant to Section 288.0656, F.S.? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes" and indicate the REDI / RAO in the space provided. (Word limit 5) Yes No 5. Indicate the United States Congressional District number(s) of the project location. (Word limit 5). 6. Will the project address equity by providing benefits to traditionally underserved communities as determined by the U.S. Census? These communities could include low-income residents, minorities, those with limited English proficiency, persons with disabilities, children, or older adults. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and briefly explain how the project improves environmental justice (e.g., disadvantage community access point(s) and destinations the project benefits, median household income, free or reduced priced school meals and how SRTS projects benefit the students, etc.). (Word limit 10). Yes No 7. Are there transit stops /shelters /support facilities within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the identification number. (Word limit 5). Yes No 8. Is the project within a high-crash pedestrian corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving pedestrians)? Yes No 3264 Part 6-Area Conditions continued... m 9. Is the project within a high-crash bicycle corridor(or an area with a history of crashes involving bicyclists)? Yes No 10.Would the project implement a bicycle or pedestrian action plan(s)? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and specify the name of the plan and date of adoption. (Word limit 5). Yes No *Metropolitan/Transportation Planning Organization/Agency(MPO) REQUIRED ® AREA CONDITIONS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies, maps illustrating transit facilities and connectivity to the improvement, short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SRTS projects, median household income by census tract for community benefiting, collision heat maps / crash data for area surrounding project limits, etc.). PART 7 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement, engagement, and collaboration is a key component of the federal project development process and must be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in the event the project is selected for funding. Indicate which of the following are applicable (Select all that apply). Complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation. 1. Does the greater community support the project, as demonstrated by recently adopted proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment and public engagement? If"yes", explain the engagement and how the concept evolved based on public involvement. Indicate the resolution number, adoption date, and participating parties in the space provided. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 2. Was the project discussed at a regularly scheduled meeting of an advisory board of an appointed group of citizens, such as bicycle pedestrian advisory groups or similar committee that provides support toward the project? If"yes", provide meeting information, including the date and type of advisory board meeting, and the input received. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 3. Was there an advertised public meeting to discuss the project? If"yes", provide a brief description, including the input received, how the concept evolved based on public involvement, date, and type of meeting. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 4. Do recent community surveys indicate both need and support for the project and stakeholders will continue to be engaged in the implementation of the project? If"yes", briefly explain. If"no", indicate N/A in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No REQUIRED ® PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., resolution, proclamation, regularly scheduled meeting agenda and minutes, public meeting advertisement, community survey, letters of support, etc.). 3265 m Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), and / or the long-term management plan(s)? [Note: Board of County Commissioners functions as MPO in nonmetropolitan areas (Section 339.135(4)(c)1, F.S.)]. If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and use the text field to explain consistency, include MPO prioritization number. If a modification is required, indicate the meeting date for adoption. (Word limit 10). Yes No UPLOAD:REQUIRED CONCURRENCY / CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s), excerpt from comprehensive plan(s), transportation plan(s), capital improvement plan(s), management plan(s), prioritization list, etc.). PART 9 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Select the boxes describing the Environmental Conditions.As applicable, complete the text field or indicate N/A in the space provided. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Environmental Conditions section. 1. Does the project involve lands identified by the Florida Wildlife Corridor Act of 2021 [Section 259.1055, Florida Statutes (F.S.)]? Yes No 2. Does the project involve state-owned conservation lands? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the state-owned conservation lands. NOTE: Use of state-owned conservation lands is subject to coordination by the managing entity. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3. Does a railway facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate railway facility. (Word limit 5). Yes No 4. Does the project physically cross a railway facility? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and indicate the crossing's railway identification number, and beginning and ending mile points. (Word limit 5). Yes No 5. Would the project provide lighting at locations with nighttime crashes? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe the proposed lighting in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 6. Would the project implement an adopted Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe proposed ADA improvements in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 3266 Part 9- Environmental Conditions continued... m 7. Is an Environmental Assessment for the project complete? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe any specific issues in the space provided. (Word limit 10). Yes No 8. Is the project adjacent to locally designated or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible resources? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list resources, indicate if the resources have received Florida Department of State Historic Preservation Grant funds, and explain any preservation agreements, covenants, or easements in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 9. Are there any archaeological sites or Native American sites located within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list State Site Number (aka Site File Number) for the sites. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 10.Are there any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife /waterfowl refuges within or adjacent to the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the facilities in the space provided. (Word limit 5). Yes No 11.Are there any navigable waterways adjacent to or within the project boundary? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and list the navigable waterways. (Word limit 5). Yes No 12.Are there any wetlands within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. Include permit types required and any obtained for the project. (Word limit 5). Yes No 13.Is it likely that there are protected /endangered /threatened species and / or critical habitat impacts within the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 14.Are there any potential contamination / hazardous waste areas within or adjacent to the project limits? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown". (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown 15.Are there any noise-sensitive areas near the project area? If not, select "no", and indicate N/A in the space provided. If so, select "yes", and describe in the space provided. If applicable, select "unknown" (Word limit 5). Yes No Unknown REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits, copy of the entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans, etc.). 3267 PART 10 - DESIGN / TYPICAL SECTIONSm Select the boxes describing the design status and complete the text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation. Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Design /Typical Section. 1. Are signed and sealed design plans available for this project? Yes No 2. If design plans are not at 100 percent, or do not meet current standards and /or reflect existing conditions, select the box identifying the status. (Word limit 100). No design plans 30% design plans 60% design plans 90% design plans Other: 3. Briefly describe the design status in the space provided. If design is at 100 percent, indicate the date of the plans. (Word limit 100). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): Typical Section(s) depicting existing and proposed features, dimensions, and ROW lines. If there are multiple segments, provide typical sections for each. If available, provide design plans. 3268 PART 11 - OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUSm Select the boxes describing the Ownership/ ROW Status and complete applicable text fields. Then, upload supporting documentation.Applicants for NI proposals may skip the Ownership/ ROW Status section. 1. Is ROW acquisition, defined as obtaining property not currently owned by the Local Agency through any means (e.g., deed, easement, dedication, donation, etc.), necessary to complete this project? Yes No 2. Explain the ROW status (owned /fee simple, leased / less-than fee, and /or needs) along the project boundary, including when ROW was obtained and how ownership is documented (e.g., plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, transfers, easements). Provide information for verifying ownership (e.g., book/ page number, transfer agreements, dates, etc.). If ROW acquisition is necessary before constructing the proposed project and / or the applicant agency is not the landowner, indicate the necessary coordination with other owners for all fee-simple purchases and / or any less-than fee/ lease needs (including temporary construction and /or other easements and / or permits for drainage, railroad, utilities, etc.) necessary to secure ROW certification. Indicate the proposed acquisition timeline, expected funding source, the total number of parcels, type of acquisition, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed land. (Word limit 150). REQUIRED UPLOAD r Infrastructure (not applicable for N11): OWNERSHIP / ROW STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting site control and related landowner supporting documentation. Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcel(s) comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there is control of the project site (e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats, warranty deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys, easements, use agreement, etc.). Maps should clearly show the location of each ownership in relation to the project boundary and /or limits. NOTE: provide map documentation on 8.5" x 11" scale. DO NOT provide reduced copies of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. If applicable, an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project, together with a spreadsheet providing the tax identification number(s) of each impacted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area for each impacted parcel. 3269 PART 12 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS Complete either the Infrastructure Table Summary with the overall project programming (phases, schedule, and estimated costs for the proposed work) or the NI Cost Narrative Table. Then, upload supporting documentation. Not all phase types may be eligible for TA funds, and not all areas prioritize all phases. Local agencies are responsi- ble for covering all unanticipated cost increases, including but not limited to price inflation and increases in the cost of construction; account for them using local funds. FDOT does not allow programming TA funds for contingency costs. The local agency must have the ability to pay for non-participating costs (e.g., utility relocation). Chapter 337.14, F.S. prohibits an entity from performing both design services and construction engineering inspection services (CEI) for a project wholly or partially funded by the FDOT and administered by a local government entity. REQUIRED UPLOAD: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 1) Either provide a detailed engineer cost estimate if the project is designed or if the project has not been designed or is a NI project, provide a detailed opinion of probable costs (including all pay items and a timeline for deliverable). Utilize the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual to develop a detailed estimate with FDOT pay items for construction phase estimates. 2)As applicable, letter from local agency budget office committing local funds to the project. *** Note: Applications for NI Projects to skip to page 15.*** 1 99 ' ''r.W.' '1,H i I H.. E N go W E. W "W Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllq m WI"" I IIIIII IW III Ilnll Fal'.."II II III Planning Development (Corridor or Feasibility) PD&E Preliminary Engineering / Design (PE) Environmental Assessment (associated with PE) Permits (associated with PE) ROW Construction CEI Other costs (describe) 3270 Part 12 - Project Implementation and Costs continued... m *** Note: applications for infrastructure projects do not need to fill out this page*** NI Cost Narrative Table Below each item, explain how the item will support the program, and other appropriate details. umHp��N���G tl�V�q�IIIIIU�mu �n�nnm�k�P pN" �b�� g, ^��.I ,�, �pU �„p> NI• ,�> „,� .tlN tlN I� „.� tlN �� �� ,�,.,;� tlN tlk, ,�, ,„..tlN i ,„.� �� � ,�, ,�, U'� ^���, �� tl�.tlN tlN. ,tlry,. lu G � q Narrative: Narrative: Narrative: Materials and Supplies: Educational items: Promotional Items: Other Expenses: Equipment: u 3271 RESOURCES FDOT Transportation Alternatives Program: httpLL/ A w.fdot.gov/plan ni ng/systems/systems-ma nagement/tap FDOT Local Agency Program Manual: http://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/LP/Default.shtm FDOT Office of Environmental Management PD&E Manual: https://www.fdot.gov/environment/pubs/pdeman/pdeman®current FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual: https://www.fdot. ov/programmanagement/estimates/documents/basisofestimatesmanual/boemanual Florida Safe Routes to School Guidelines: https://www.fdot.gov/safety/2A®Programs/Safe®Routes.shtm 3272 FDOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM „mmloo!!p ii0ow, � m w CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: PROJECT LIMITS: (from south or west limit) (to north or east limit) By checking the box you agree to do the following: Enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as necessary, prior to the design phase. Comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project. Provide any required funding match, incur any additional expenses beyond the approved project costs in the LAP agreement, and are responsible for any non-participating items (e.g. utility relocations). Pursue or retain LAP certification and enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT. Comply with NEPA process prior to construction, including any necessary involvement with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and other State and/or Federal agencies, prior to construction. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and agree to follow through on the project once programmed in the FDOT's Work Program. I fully understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the FDOT's Work Program. * Signature Name (please type or print) Title Date *This should be executed by person who has signatory authority for sponsor and is authorized to obligate services and funds for that entity (generally chairman of the board or council). 3273 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 11111EQUI11RIED UPLOAD, PROJECT INFORIMAT1011411 SUPPORTING i 'i T1 0 Inolluuding '11) cope of worts clearly describing the purpose and need for this project and the desired ouutoourne,detailed descrilptiion of the existing conditlonsa and detaliled description of the Iproposed project,and major work Item Improvements (e.g.,(project limits(begin I end),width of sidewalks or trails and other components, rnatehais,drainage, lighting,signing and pavement markings,etc.). ) Intent to enter Into a cost reimbursement agreement for dellNering the Iprojeot. 3) Signed PROJECT CERTIFICATION from the maintaining agency confirming the,applicant is authorized to submit time proposal, the information is accurate, intent to enter into a Mlemoranduurn of Understanding or Interagency Agreement for ongoing operations end maintenance of the improved facility',and cornphance with aH federal and state requirements. Scope of Work COCO PLUM DRIVE LIGHTING INSTALLATION SCOPE OF WORK Background: Coco Plum Drive serves a multitude of residents and visitors to the City of Marathon. It boasts several marinas, businesses, dozens of vacation rentals, two yacht clubs, hundreds of residences including workforce housing, Coco Plum Beach, and a multi-use path, which currently terminates at Ave. K just west of the Coco Plum Beach entrance. The City is in the planning process of extending the multi-use trail and adding lighting to the end of Coco Plum Drive and is submitting a TA application for funding.There is currently no lighting along the existing Coco Plum Drive multi-use trail, and the City has received numerous requests to provide lighting along this corridor, as the trail is actively used by the residents and visitors. This project aims to enhance safety for pedestrians and traffic on Coco Plum Drive by installing amber, turtle-friendly lighting. The initiative involves installing amber LED lights that are not only vital for turtle nesting areas but also improve visibility and safety for pedestrians and drivers during nighttime hours. Site Assessment: Prior to the start of work the City will conduct a comprehensive assessment of Coco Plum Drive to identify areas with high pedestrian activity, crosswalks, intersections, and any potential safety hazards. Lighting Design and Selection:The City, through the appropriate selection process, will engage the services of a qualified engineering consultant to provide construction and contract documents for the installation of the required underground conduit, electric conductors, electric service, appropriate light fixtures and poles, and all other services necessary for the successful installation of lighting along this corridor. Since the project is adjacent to Coco Plum Beach and other private beaches designated as turtle nesting beaches, special attention will be given to the type of lighting installed to ensure all requirements for turtle lighting are met. At the early stages of design, we again will engage with the public for input on the design and fixture selection, and when feasible include and address the public input into the final design and product. Local Authority Approval: Obtain all necessary permits and approvals from local authorities for the installation of new lighting fixtures. Community Engagement: Develop a public information plan for continued communication with the local residents about the upcoming lighting improvements and potential impacts on pedestrian and traffic safety. Organize community meetings to gather input and address concerns. Lighting Plan Implementation: Upon execution of the LAP construction agreement, and concurrence from the District Office, the City will bid the project in accordance with all required provisions and requirements of the LAP agreement. The City will obtain the services of a qualified CEI consultant to oversee the construction activities of the lighting project to ensure all plan requirements and contractual obligations of the selected contractor are met. 18 of 9(,3274 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Fixture Features for Safety: Install fixtures with appropriate features such as glare reduction, proper shielding, and uniform distribution of light to minimize shadows and enhance safety. Pay special attention to lighting at crosswalks and intersections to ensure optimal visibility for pedestrians and drivers. Educational Signage: Install informative signage to educate the public about the purpose of amber lighting, emphasizing its benefits for both safety and turtle-friendly practices. Documentation and Reporting: Document the installation process with photographs and compile a comprehensive report highlighting the positive impacts on safety and community well-being. Cost Reimbursement Agreement:Abide by the current FDOT LAP Agreement that is in place regarding cost reimbursement for the completion of the Coco Plum Drive Lighting. This Scope of Work outlines the comprehensive approach to completing the Coco Plum Drive Lighting project, ensuring that it not only fulfills its initial vision but also enhances the community's connectivity, safety, and overall quality of life. 19 of 9(,3275 REQUIRED UIPLOAD, AREA COINIDIT11ONSSUPPORTING TI DOCUMENTATION(e. .,excerpt pages from adopted plans or studies,maps Oliustratting transit facilities and connectivity to the Improvement,short statement of support with a signature of the school official and their contact information for SiRT5 projects, median houasehoid income by census tract for community benefiting, coilllision heat:maps J crash data for area surrounding,project Ilirnits,etc.). Project is adjacent to already developed scarified land. City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan Adopted March 8, 2005 Effective July 7, 2005 Updated February, 2013 Transportation Element Objective 7-1.3 Encourage Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths In order to provide for bicycle and pedestrian travel that is safe, convenient, and efficient, the City shall assist, encourage, and provide bicycle and/or pedestrian paths. §163.3177(6)(b)1. F.S. Policy 7-1.3.1 Prepare Bicycle Path and Pedestrian Improvement Plan The City shall plan for coordinated bicycle path and pedestrian way improvements emphasizing access to schools, parks, and shopping centers, which supplement the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan. Policy 7-1.3.2 Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Path Network The City shall promote a systematic approach to the development of a pedestrian and bicycle path network.The City shall also investigate the increased use of golf carts and alternative transportation means by the public and private sectors in order to improve energy efficient transportation links between major activity areas such as residential neighborhoods, schools, employment centers, shopping areas, resorts and parks and recreational areas. Objective 4-1.10 Preservation of Historical,Cultural,or Archaeological Features Policy 4-1.10.5 Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Path Network The City shall promote a systematic approach to the development of a pedestrian and bicycle path network.The City shall also investigate the increased use of golf carts and alternative transportation means by the public and private sectors in order to improve energy efficient transportation links between major activity areas such as residential neighborhoods, schools, employment centers, shopping areas, resorts and parks and recreational areas. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES PURPOSE Pursuant to Chapter 163.3177(6)(e) F.S. the purpose of the Recreation and Open Space Element is to plan for a system of public and private sites for passive and active recreation and open space. GOAL 8-1 PROVIDE SAFE AND ADEQUATE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES It is the goal of the City to provide safe and adequate open space and recreation facilities that are accessible to all Marathon residents. §163.3177(6)(e) F.S. Objective 8-1.1 Plan for Recreational Trails and Open Space The City shall comprehensively plan for creating new or enhanced recreational trail systems and open space facilities, based upon data, standards, and policies contained in the Plan, and shall adequately maintain the provided sites and facilities. Through the Capital Improvements Plan, the City shall ensure that sufficient acreage is maintained and acquired and sufficient facilities 20 of SIC3276 are maintained and developed to meet these needs. §163.3177(6)(e)F.S. Policy 8-1.1.1 Adopt a Minimum Level of Service Standard The City shall adopt a minimum level of service standard for City-managed public recreation sites of 4.42 acres per 1,000 permanent residents and seasonal visitors.The specific number, size, type, and location of facilities shall be determined through the development of a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan as required by Policy 8-1.1.2. Policy 8-1.1.2 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan The City shall fully examine the existing recreation and open space areas and prepare a master plan.The master plan shall make recommendations, as needed,to enhance equitable access, distribution, and availability to recreational facilities or open space. Policy 8-1.1.3 Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply The City shall periodically prepare a report, as established by the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, updating the recreational land and facility demand and supply analysis contained in the Recreation and Open Space Data Inventory and Analysis of this Plan. If the analysis identifies any deficiencies, the City shall identify and enact a method for meeting the deficiency. City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan Adopted March 8, 2005 Page 118 of 121 Chapter 8 Effective July 7,2005 Updated February, 2013 Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 8-1.1.4 Program Park Improvements Park improvement plans resulting from the analysis in Policy 8-1.1.3 shall be programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Policy 8-1.1.5 Maintain Existing Recreational Land and Facilities The City shall establish a routine preventive maintenance program and shall annually review all City owned recreational and open space resources for safety standards, compliance to applicable regulations, and stormwater management. Policy 8-1.1.6 Improve the Existing Recreational Facilities Upon the basis of the annual review,the City shall improve the physical and aesthetic condition of the City's recreational and open space facilities by allocating funding through the Capital Improvements Program. Policy 8-1.1.7 Ensure Accessibility Through the annual review and development review process, the City shall ensure that all public recreational facilities be made accessible to automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians depending on the type of facility. Lands dedicated solely for open space or conservation are exempt from this requirement. Policy 8-1.1.8 Ensure Compliance with the Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Through development review,the City shall ensure that all future parks and recreational facilities comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.Through development review, the City shall ensure that all renovating, rehabilitating, and upgrading to parks and recreational facilities comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Policy 8-1.1.9 Require Mandatory Land Dedication or Fees in Lieu TherEOf The City shall continue to maintain Land Development Regulations mandating the dedication of land for parks and recreation or fees in lieu thereof for all new development, to be used for the acquisition of land for parks, conservation and open space.The formula shall be a pro rata formula based on the City's demand and supply analysis, to ensure that new developments provide necessary recreational lands, facilities and/or fees in lieu thereof in order to 21 of 9(,3277 accommodate the additional generated demand. Policy 8-1.1.10 Incorporate Creative Design Concepts and Conserve Environmentally Sensitive Open Space Active and passive recreation areas shall be planned in a manner compatible with the unique natural resources found in the City. Park improvement plans shall be designed to preserve, protect, and enhance the environmental features found on each site.Where appropriate, recreational areas shall be designed to provide a circulation system that minimizes conflict between bicyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles. Adequate landscape and screening shall be integrated into park improvement plans to minimize land use conflicts, protect stability of established residential areas, and enhance community appearance. Map of Area for Lighting Installation o , r � �I i, � J1 TM a d yy Ilir� p nff ExisRing Pain—hlewr Lighting PR®p—d � �✓J rl i��m�i a m ,fa"W� � ky� ( ��i f 'IX 6 III mw S U I ��� , a✓ �'' i 22 of 9(,3278 VIU� �°�ONTY Monroe County, FL UNI2UE CU , t Overview Legend Major Roads v II u`^ I iy 1 Centerline Easements K,. wr Hooks Lot Lines Road Center Rights of Way Shoreline Key Names k �r f' r s I A,— Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Alternate ID 1449946 Owner Address CITY OF MARATHON Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Class RIGHT OF WAY 9805 Overseas Hwy Property Address VACANT LAND Marathon,FL 33050 MARATHON District 50CM Brief Tax Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P64-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC (11'^JoLP-1 II"JoL Lo Ibo a usod oii n IIrgalll docu uimcaii ft) Date created:11/29/2023 Last Data Uploaded:11/2 9/202 3 4:04:26 AM Developed bySchneider 23 of 9C3279 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Monroe County, FL Disclaimer The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office maintains data on property within the County solely for the purpose of fulfilling its responsibility to secure a just valuation for ad valorem tax purposes of all property within the County.The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office cannot guarantee its accuracy for any other purpose.Likewise,data provided regarding one tax year may not be applicable in prior or subsequent years.By requesting such data,you hereby understand and agree that the data is intended for ad valorem tax purposes only and should not be relied on for any other purpose. By continuing into this site you assert that you have read and agree to the above statement. Summary Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Account# 1449946 Property ID 1449946 MillageGroup 50CM Location Address VACANT LAND,MARATHON Legal Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P134-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC �aalaa:II'4W laa Ilya,w,ud ouii Ilu.a gall da cuilina.inil',r,J Neighborhood 10041 Property Class RIGHT OF WAY(9400) Subdivision Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Affordable Housing No Owner a:;Irlry;::�11 Irnlr fro-{;::�Ir ...................................................... 9805 Overseas Hwy Marathon FL 33050 Valuation 2023 Certified Values 2022 Certified Values 2021 Certified Values 2020 Certified Values + Market Improvement Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Misc Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Land Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Just Market Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Total Assessed Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 School Exempt Value ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) = School Taxable Value $0 $0 $0 $0 Historical Assessments Year Land Value Building Value Yard Item Value Just(Market)Value Assessed Value Exempt Value Taxable Value Maximum Portability 2022 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2021 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2020 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2019 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2018 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 Iic II`n1,�a;nlltrimruin I vane L;I llIIulu ir,iuiii ud luirinala oiiiIls uiiid°J-io.rd iniaal be i' 11iud rpnanru�lII lu iaaa.mlll Vpoiu Mb lIRy urino uiniL 4 oi[il ia: on WI icu Wvo.ufu lII iu H bmll Vpoiu MlLyoIIulu�irinoia iiL Land Land Use Number of Units Unit Type Frontage Depth (8600) 1.00 Lot 0 0 View Tax I nfo View axes'ftn LIhiis Ilaircell ......................................................... 3280 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 24 of 9(, „� 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Map 1 N I No data available for the following modules:Buildings,Yard Items,Sales,Permits,Sketches(click to enlarge),Photos,TRIM Notice. Schneider GCJ5 PAT IY4L U.Yr e it II°iriivyc 111 slIlia,v G I blFIR II°iri pa y Notice gsa,1 a pa p u�1i�il�p p� e��� aJ of 04 26A IV 3281 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 250 9( , REQUIRED UIPLOAD., PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e,g., resolution, prodarnafion, regularly schedulled meefing agenda and minutes, public meefing advertisement, community survey,Iletters of support, etc,). Please see following for public support documentation: 3282 III , not avaflaI IIIe at the fli iitaat Lfl3i i i ii III III III III: III... ...IIL.. iinm n a oin III: 1.. . City of Marathon Planning Commission Monday November 20, 2023 9805 Overseas Hwy City Hall Council Chambers 5:30 PM 1. Call To Order 2. Pledge Of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval Of Minutes 5. Quasi-Judicial Statement 6. Items For Public Hearing 7. Adjournment 5. Please be advised that the item on the agenda is quasi-judicial in nature. If you wish to give testimony on any item, please inform the Boards clerk by filling out an available sign-up form. An opportunity to speak will be made available after the applicant and staff have made their presentations on each item. All testimony, including public testimony and evidence, will be made under oath or affirmation. Additionally, all persons giving testimony may be subject to cross examination. If you refuse either to be cross examined or to be sworn your testimony will not be considered. The public will not be allowed to cross examine witnesses, but they can ask the Commission to ask questions on their behalf. Persons representing organizations must present evidence of their authority to speak for the organization. 6. Items For Public Hearing 1. Consideration Of A Request For A Conditional Use Permit For Scott Ebert Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations (Code) Entitled "Conditional Use Permits" For Unification Of Two Residential Units Into A Single Family Residential Until With 11 Bedrooms And 11 Bathrooms; Located At 574 Sombrero Beach Road; Which Is Legally Described As Block 2 (Bottom Floor) Southerly And Northemly (Top Floor) Part Of Lot 17, Sombrero Beach Village Boot Key P135-86, Monroe County, Florida; Having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 And 00355110-000100,Nearest Mile Marker 50. 27 of 9C3283 kM\4M City of Marathon Planning Commission Monday July 17, 2023 o+; 9805 Overseas Hwy / City Hall Council Chambers MINUTES Sexton called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order on Monday July 17, 2023, at 5:30 pm. In attendance: Planning Director Brian Shea, Attorney Steve Williams, Planner Amber Stonik, Planner Erin Dafoe, and members of the public. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The roll was called. Mark Senmartin-present; Mary Ann Royse-present; Mike Cinque-present; Andrew George-present; Matt Sexton-present. Senmartin added a discussion on Planning packet requirements. Sexton called for an approval of the minutes from the last meeting. Senmartin moved to approve. Royse seconded. The motion was approved 5-0. The quasi-judicial statement was read into the record. The agenda packet requirements discussion was heard first. Addition of conceptual drawings and elevations should be required. A resolution will be generated for City Council to approve the additions to the packets. Item 1 was read into the record: Consideration Of A Request By Marathon LLC For A Conditional Use Permit, Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations ("The Code") Entitled "Conditional Use Permits", Authorizing The Development Of A Climate Controlled Storage Facility and Sixteen (16) Single Family Residential Units Consisting Of Five (5) Parcels Located At 775 1071h Street Ocean Which Is Legally Described As Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaccas Part Government Lot 1 and Part Government Lot 2 Part Parcel 3 And Adjacent Bay Bottom South Of And Adjacent Part Government Lot 1; 796 1061h St Ocean Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vacca Part Government Lot 2 Part Parcel 3; 797 1061h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaca Part Government Lot 2 Parcel 2; 630 1071h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaca Part Government Lot 1, And Vacant Land 1071h Street Which Is Legally Described As Section 6 Township 66 Range 33 Key Vaccas Part Government Lot 1, Monroe County, Florida, Having Real Estate Numbers 00104260-000000, 00104430-000300, 00104430-000200, 00104240-000400 and 00104240-000100. Nearest Mile Marker 53. Dafoe presented the item with the help of visual aids. Pagel of 4 28 of 9C3284 Jim Saunders presented the item on behalf of the applicant. There were no public speakers. Shea asked if there were any exparte-communications, Sexton and George received a phone call that would not affect their decisions. After a brief discussion on contained lighting, vegetation buffers, condo docs, speed bumps, and signage, Senmartin made a motion to approve Item 1 with the additional conditions which will amend conditions 12 and 13, add condition 30 for access signage, and add condition 31 for speed bump requirements. Royse seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Item 2 was read into the record: Consideration Of A Request By H & R Marathon LLC For A Conditional Use Permit, Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations ("The Code") Entitled "Conditional Use Permits", Authorizing The Development Of A Group Home Including Ten (10) Residential Units And Four (4) Affordable Housing Units, Dining Hall, Fitness Center, Storage And Commercial Kitchen; Which Is Legally Described As Section 5 Township 66 Range 33 Fat Deer Key Part Lot 3 And Part Government Lot 3 (AKA Part Of State Road No 5 (US 1)) And Section 5 Township 66 Range 33 Fat Deer Key Part Lot 3 (Part Old State Road), Monroe County, Florida, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100540-000000 And 00100640-000000. Nearest Mile Marker 53. Cinque recused himself from Item 2. Dafoe presented the item. Applicant Mike Murphy, CEO of Bravo Zulu Retreat, spoke about the organization and their mission. Phil Badalamenti from Little Red Rooster Architects presented the item for the applicant. Sexton opened the meeting to public speakers: • Julie Wilson voiced concerns regarding sewer, fencing, landscaping, drainage, construction time frame, construction dust and noise, retreat vs. resort, and the City's part in helping with $2 million dollar to build. Royse had exparte-communication with Catherine Felton of Little Red Rooster Architects that would not affect her decision. After a brief discussion, Senmartin moved to approve Item 2. George seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 4-0. Item 3 was read into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida, Amending Chapter 103 "Zoning Districts", Article 3 "Use And Intensity Tables", Updating Table 103.15.1 "Uses By Zoning District"; Providing For The Repeal Of All Code Provisions And Ordinances Inconsistent With Page 2 of 4 29 of 9C3285 This Ordinance; Providing For Severability; Providing For Inclusion In The Code Of Ordinances, City Of Marathon, Florida; And Providing An Effective Date. Brian Shea presented the item. This changes the code section/table on Open Air Markets to reflect a Conditional Use Permit is not required but the market owners would require a license. There were no public speakers. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 3. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Item 4 was read into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida, Amending Chapter 104 "Specific Use Regulations", Article 1 "General Provisions", Updating Section 104.25 "Hotels Or Motels"; Providing For The Repeal Of All Code Provisions And Ordinances Inconsistent With This Ordinance; Providing For Severability; Providing For Inclusion In The Code Of Ordinances, City Of Marathon, Florida; And Providing An Effective Date. Shea presented the item. This item amends requirements for lobby, shuttles, development clustering in less environmentally sensitive areas, and 20% conversion rate in offsite employee housing. Senmartin requested the increase be 25% instead of 20%. After a brief discussion, Senmartin made a motion to approve Item 4 with the 25% increase. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Items 5 and 6 were read together into the record: An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon, Florida Amending The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) From Residential Medium (RM) To Mixed Use Commercial (MU-C) For Property Described As Lots 1 Through 4 Of Block 6 And Lot 4 Of The Amended Plat Of Gulfstream Shores Of Marathon Plat 42 As Recorded In Plat Book 3-142, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100890-000000 And 00349440-000000; Providing For Severability; Providing For The Repeal Of Conflicting Provisions; Providing For The Transmittal Of This Ordinance To The State Department Of Economic Opportunity; And Providing For An Effective Date Upon The Approval Of This Ordinance By The State Department Of Economic Opportunity. -and- Item 6 An Ordinance Of The City Of Marathon Florida Amending The Zoning From Residential Medium (RM) To Mixed Use (MU) For Property Described As Lots 1 Through 4 Of Block 6 And Lot 4 Of The Amended Plat Of Gulfstream Shores Of Marathon Plat 42 As Recorded In Plat Book 3-142, Having Real Estate Numbers 00100890-000000 And 00349440-000000; Providing For Severability; Providing For The Repeal Of Conflicting Provisions; Providing For The Transmittal Of This Ordinance Page 3 of 4 30 of 9(,3286 To The State Department Of Economic Opportunity; And Providing For An Effective Date Upon The Approval Of This Ordinance By The State Department Of Economic Opportunity. Shea presented the items. The two items clean-up existing FLUM and Zoning designations adopted by the County, this will make the Kirk of the Keys property entirely Mixed-Use. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 5. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Cinque made a motion to approve Item 6. Sexton seconded. The roll was called. The item was approved 5-0. Motion and second to adjourn at 6:59 pm. ATTEST: Matt Sexton-Planning Commissioner Chair ATTEST: Brian Shea-Planning Director Audio-Video is available upon request. Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes,if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such hearing or meeting, one will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made; such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ADA Assistance: Anyone needing special assistance at the Planning Commission Meeting due to disability should contact the City of Marathon at(305-)743-0033 at least two days prior thereto. (Please note that one or more Marathon City Council members may participate in the meeting.) Page 4 of 4 31 of 9(,3287 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT w Meeting Date: November 20, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Erin Dafoe, Associate Planner Agenda Item: Consideration Of A Request For A Conditional Use Permit For Scott Ebert Pursuant To Chapter 102, Article 13 Of The City Of Marathon Land Development Regulations (Code) Entitled "Conditional Use Permits" For Unification of two residential units into a single family residential until with 11 bedroom and 11 bathrooms;Located at 574 Sombrero Beach Road; Which Is Legally Described As Block 2(bottom floor) Southerly and Northernly(top floor)part of Lot 17, Sombrero Beach Village Boot Key P135-86, Monroe County, Florida; Having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100, Nearest Mile Marker 50 APPLICANT/OWNER: Scott Ebert AGENT: Chad Neller LOCATION: The project site is located on two parcels at 574 Sombrero Beach Road, nearest mile marker 50. See Figure 1. Figure 1 Project Site i i >> fnu ✓ i (' ! / v.-..✓`awn .. VneS f ae. o00 ,�„✓1 0 ,,, W 120 180 2,10 00355110-000000 CU 1 32 of 9C3288 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Approval for development of the subject properties having the real estate numbers 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100 to combine two residential units into one single family 11 bedroom, 11 bathroom unit. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Medium (RM). Figure 2: Future Land Use Map WN %'%/ r f r �!P ��ir/ �' r ��� aE�ln>rux�m�� Baku�0�1�////✓ I, i G ab VE i�1 �� �i 1�, 1 , �yi➢' 1rlN u��� YARN'.T11 tll/�/ 7 �J �� ih.� 4 M °6 ! 1/� r`� /10 R av, "oF V ae o Div oonaoo / 0 30 GO '110 180 210 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Medium (RM). See Figure 3. Figure 3: Zoning Map ta N Al 1 A Ir/ IaxilY " meµ fi �Kt OF o 120 eo 0 00355110-000000 CU 2 33 of 9(,3289 LOT SIZE: Total acreage: 0.19 acres or 8,430 sq feet including both parcels. SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: Zoning Use North Residential Medium Single family residential East N/A Canal South Residential Medium Single family residential West Residential High Single family residential and The Schooner Condos EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project site consists of two parcels having Real Estate Number 00355110-000000 and 00355110-000100. These parcels currently contain a duplex consisting of a four-bedroom and six-bedroom residential units. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT: Residential Units: One residential unit with 11 bedrooms and 11 baths. BACKGROUND: The proposed project is the unification of two residential units into one single family residential unit with more than six bedrooms in the Residential medium zoning classification. This report addresses the Conditional Use application.All conditions of the Conditional Use Permit approval will have to be met before any building permit will be approved. See Attachment A. EVALUATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: The criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Approval are outlined in Chapter 102, Article 13, Conditional Use Permits, in the City of Marathon Land Development Regulations. CRITERIA A. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and LDRs; The proposed redevelopment project is located within the Residential Medium(RM)Zoning District. Per Chapter 103, Article 2, Section 103.12 of the Land Development Regulations, the district is designed to"is intended to establish areas of low-to medium-density residential uses characterized principally by single-family detached and two-family dwellings,designated within the Residential Medium (RM) future land use category on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)." The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of an existing residential use and is consistent with the Residential Medium District. Section 103.15 establishes whether specific uses are allowed as of right, limited, accessory or conditional uses, through Table 103.15.2. That table shows that single single-family dwellings of 7 bedrooms or more are allowed as Conditional Uses in the RM 00355110-000000 CU 3 34 of 9(,3290 district. Conditional Use review is intended to allow a broader view of the potential impacts of a project on adjacent uses and on City concurrency related resources such as road capacity, solid waste, sewer, and potable water availability. Table 103.15.2 in the Land Development Regulations establishes constraints on density and intensity allowed in the RM district based on the types of uses proposed. The project as proposed meets the basic definition of development in the RM zoning district and meets the density constraints imposed on the type of proposed use. B. The proposed use is compatible with the existing land use pattern and future uses designated by the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed project is located within the Residential Medium Future Land Use District.Policy 1- 3.1.4 of the City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan states that the"principal purpose of the Residential Medium future land use category is to provide for medium-density single-family, residential development. The Residential Medium future land use category is characterized by predominantly compact development on lots with disturbed or scarified vegetation and areas that are appropriate for infill development and that are served by existing infrastructure." The proposed project will unify the existing duplex into one single-family dwelling with 11 bedrooms and 11 bathrooms. Existing land use patterns are residential to the north,west and south and a canal east of the property. C. The proposed use shall not adversely affect the health,safety,and welfare of the public; The proposed use is a continuation of residential use which has not had any known impact to the health, safety and welfare of the public. No new impacts are expected to arise from the proposed conditional use. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. D. The proposed conditional use minimizes environmental impacts, including but not limited to water,air,stormwater management,wildlife,vegetation,wetlands,and the natural functioning of the environment; The subject area contains no area recognized as possible habitat for a state or federally listed animal species. Stormwater management improvements were completed as part of recent permitting. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. E. Satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been made concerning the following matters,where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive, bicycle, and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in cases of fire or catastrophe; Ingress and egress to the property is being provided through the current access driveway onto Sombrero Beach Rd. A Traffic Study was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. The proposed plan is projected to have a decrease of daily vehicles trips compared to the existing duplex on site. 00355110-000000 CU 4 35 of 9(,3291 Table 1 574 Im5nibrera Brach Road Irip(kmrralicin sanlnhan Marathim,Ficifrielm DAY AM Peak Dour lripups I'M Peak HourTrips Laud Usc "An '1'61. In Out Wall In 0,ull I Total L-TiviFiR N1 L Ififamily I Hy,)using( cm- Ise) 211 N 12 0 1 1 E 0 1 Detached [knising I D4 91 0 1 1 E 0 1 I I�fferencc(P'rapo%ed-ExiMing) 13) 1) 0 (1, r 1) 0 0 Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required,with particular attention to item 1 above; Section 104.51.1. The City will require a minimum of one (1)parking space per bedroom unless otherwise justified and validated by the Conditional Use Permit applicant. The proposed 11-bedroom single family dwelling will require eleven (11)parking spaces. As the property sits now there is not enough space for the required amount of parking. The applicant proposes a maximum of 6 vehicles and I boat trailer parking spaces on site per their vacation rental agreement. See Attachment B. The current property as a duplex with 4 and 6 bedrooms only requires two (2)parking spaces per unit for a total of four(4) required. Therefore, the request with conditions is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 3. The noise, glare, or odor effects of the conditional use on surrounding properties; The proposed use consists of continuation of current residential use. The proposed residential use will not change current setbacks from neighboring property owners. Therefore,the proposed project should not have any adverse effect through noise, glare, or odors. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. 4. Refuse and service areas,with particular reference to locations,screening,and Items 1 and 2 above; The proposed use will not refuse collection locations. Garbage is collected through cans with Marathon Garage Service. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. 00355110-000000 CU 5 36 of 9(,3292 5. Utilities,with reference to location and availability; Chapter 107, Article 13, establishes the City's Concurrency Management and certification requirements. This Conditional Use constitutes the City's Concurrency Level of Service Certificate, as follows: • Wastewater: The applicant provided flow calculations and will be assessed a fee of $2,981.54 based upon the increased flows. • Water: The Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority already provides potable water for the duplex. • Solid Waste: Marathon Garbage Service already provides solid waste disposal. • Surface Water: The applicant has provided stormwater design information suitable for the Conditional Use application review which demonstrates compliance with City standards. A final stormwater plan has been completed through recent permits. • Recreation and Open Space: This development will have a de minimus impact on recreation and open space. • Roadways: The applicant is developing the site with a lower density than was contained within the duplex; however, a traffic analysis was completed to analyze the impact on transportation facilities finding it will have a reduction in traffic. • Educational Facilities: This redevelopment will have a de minimus impact on educational facilities since existing uses are replaced in kind. Section 104.51.1. specifies that "Residences with seven (7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly." Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 6. Screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions, and character; The proposed conditional use will not alter the current screening,buffering,dimensions,or character of the property. Code states that one canopy tree is required for every 50 feet of linear street frontage. The property already fulfills this requirement. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 7. Signs,if any,and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare,traffic safety and compatibility with surrounding uses; No additional signage or exterior lighting is proposed to the property. 8. Required yards and other open space; Table 106.16.1 specifies that property classified as Class III, developed. Which has is a minimum 20% open space requirement. Open space ratios were maintained and verified as part of the renovation permits. Therefore, the request is in compliance with the requirements of these sections. 00355110-000000 CU 6 37 of 9(,3293 9. General compatibility with surrounding properties; The proposed use is residential. Adjacent uses include single family residential dwelling units. The proposed use is compatible with these nearby structures in terms of appearance and footprints. The use will not change the current appearance or footprint. With the ability to vacation rent a unit at two people per bedroom,plus an additional two,this could amount to 24 people overnight for the duplex. As the 11-bedroom single-family under the same regulations, the same 24 people overnight is achieved. The property currently has a vacation rental license for both units (VACA-23-288 and VACA-23- 385). By appropriately conditioning the approval, City Council has the ability to ensure a level of compliance with community character that is not achievable with projects permitted as of right. 10. Any special requirements set forth in the LDRs for the particular use involved. Existing residential use to remain residential. Section 104.51.1. entitled Single-family dwellings (7 Bedrooms or more)requires the following conditions. 1. Wastewater Flow Calculations. a. Residences with six (6) six bedrooms or less will be assumed to equate to one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) at 167 gallons per day. System development and connection charges, as well as monthly base and flow charges will accrue and be billed as a single-family residence. b. Residences with seven (7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly. 2. The City will require a minimum of one (1) parking space per bedroom unless otherwise justified and validated by the Conditional Use Permit applicant. 3. A Traffic Study was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. The proposed plan is projected to have a decrease of daily vehicles trips compared to the existing duplex on site. As stated in Section E 2.the applicant will require per their vacation rental agreement that there is a maximum of 6 vehicles and 1 boat trailer which must be parked in the driveway only. Therefore, with the above requirements,the request is in compliance with the requirements of this section. CONCLUSION: 00355110-000000 CU 7 38 of 9(,3294 The Conditional Use Approval is intended to allow for the integration of certain land uses and structures within the City of Marathon based on conditions imposed by the Council.Review is based primarily on compatibility of the use with its proposed location and with surrounding land uses. Conditional uses shall not be allowed where the conditional use would create a nuisance, traffic congestion, a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use permit application based on the proposed use of an 11-bedroom and 11-bathroom single family dwelling with specific conditions to ensure community character. Conditions and Limitations of Approval • Must meet NFPA1, NFPA 101 and NFPA 58 requirements. • The applicant will obtain City approval for wastewater management through the City's Wastewater Utility;Residences with seven(7)bedrooms or more will be assessed based on a calculation of average wastewater flows developed and provided by a qualified wastewater engineer. Such wastewater flow will be calculated into the one-time System Development and Connection charges and be billed accordingly. • Parking to be a maximum of 6 vehicles and 1 boat trailer must maintained on the property and not in the ROW at any time. • The Conditional Use Development Order will constitute the Certificate of Concurrency for the project. The determination will be valid for one year. • A unity of Title will be required as part of single-family conversion. 00355110-000000 CU 8 39 of 9(,3295 cfl a N M f31 sm o _ 0 CD o° m .. oo Qom 5oGi odic <o 00 0O[ �s 00 „0'p oI p 1 R w o �o W ,- - ,bff m Mfl � i og° Qo 0 ^'�;NjJ df� i� N mLL�� '�m000 �mao yO[FI )Ofl S> _ oF!TIIflCI ONno 1 n— V� Q� 90 cA �� o�� ` -/O. �,� � �`' ov AVManla 1-7Atr<I9 y oti � mo . O �. � � o; nnv�,aid i � -- I �- � � it �.1iNvid a�d2 e ti cz �d6ZM(IN, o�rwa t � tivM�ni�a iJnt�:y ,o u�— s, _ izer�iaNs 0 wxd» r00(101. { re�fli��is (D ���cc o i of:p c 0 �- u <'2 o .., 5 aa1�r»�o - o'os <�l 1 0,r vi U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O ti CN CV) t cu , Z�Q C Q, u EE -Ij 0 75 Q, U U:l 0 IT, r-4 cn cz u N cn Li� Z —u —u u u u u u > > > F4 cz 4." cz 9:1 0 - -do 0 O Ca Cld O 2f iO O O O O O O v�4kpqX+ A e CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9805 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305-289-4121 Planning@ci.marathon.fl.us *"*"Discussion its.to for o n daY;,,,,N�����u��m .„ 2 �,,,�„ ITEMFOR PUBLIC MEETING: Applications for Florida Department of Transportation "Transportation Alternatives Grant Program"for fiscal year 2030. A public meeting regarding the Transportation Alternative (TA) Grant Applications that are being considered for submission on December 6, 2023. A continuation of the Surface Transportation Block Grant, TA funding is by contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund, subject to the overall federal-aid obligation limitation determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Projects must support surface transportation, be competitively solicited, and comply with the provisions of the FDOT Work Program Instructions and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act(IRA) [§11109; 23 United States Code (U.S.C) 133(h)j. This year the City of Marathon will be submitting three grant applications for consideration: 1. Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Trail/Turn-Around 2. Installation ofPath Lighting along Coco Plum Trail 3. Grassy Key Birding Boardwalk Trail Phase I Strengthening our economy by enhancing traveling experiences throughout communities, TA also funds cultural, historical, and environmental aspects of transportation infrastructure including construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas; historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities; vegetation management in transportation rights-of-way; archaeological activities related to impacts from transportation projects; and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity. 42 of 9(,3298 /D C14 rn 4-� )Qrn 5::� • r---4�> CId 4-j 0 C75 4—j LLJ cy-) � c-,i 4-j 0 0 z CI\j Q) 0 0 pU� C,\j rmmmq c �E �-E �E LLJ Li- cd � C\j 0 0 u W 4—j > C� u 0 Q) O < rT cd �-4 C\j F—I C) C\j aglow, "itm" "low" 491OW OVOID,," moo, n 4aw, AMP 41WI- qdlbelt." 4mv/;, 4ftkIII O O M M W Cl� O Q O z z m m n � Q cn z >- O LJ U � ct od U = z Q � J O m z 0 � O Q U � U J z � O cn J z Q • Un w > 0 � w 0 Q -1 � O U z0 O CL) z $� J O m � Q 0 m M � U (a) — M j o O U uo -- i- 4-J U U co Q) 4-j 0� U 4-j ® 4-j U U 4-j 4-j `+- 4-j U < L x u ' u U d 4-J L+- t/�vy U 4-J (A `+- ±' (A _ U co u U 4-j 0) U DL 4-jQ) co 4-j +-J — co co s- vy • N O M M 7f � / lr RMAI��»MIN,»!»O1rN!..........!»»»»y1)) Y�1I!»/ a 8 Iq 40 i a Q) 4-' M 4- , 4, a >_ U i- ; .— a C Q} , �- 4-J 0 � co j 0 cJ U a U 0 Q) > Q) co a a _ Q) _ --j a) a) cn a _ cn 4-j Q) Uco U a a U a U ' a a co 4- 4-, 'J cn —. 4-j a a) � co a) Ua Q) - -� Q) 4-j co _ 0a °' x w 4-j co U f a co s `+_ • • • V c i cld 4-j C') CL) O �,�� ��, � � � ,�, o �u;,, M i� ,'� M �K y ��� (� ��' Y' (�6i U ��� ', � �1 � I fj �I'///� rn, � �'�/ /� r F r, t� u� ;I ,, � , r�` " L�fUI, ley, ��,:<. >>', ,A�, u , �� 1 u�Ni; i � r ui ��� �.��' '�:. �:.� �� � ;1 �� � t; �e� r. � �� ��:; `�: � r °�,,nr ,,; ���� �,, � J w.� 'i y r.;... �, � �'� �� t4��: � � � Y � N W Yjr+ //� ���� � r� �iio1,� `I H � ii It y�� � �� Y i i � � �. M �r � � ' 2,, i � i�f4 t � d '� N�NYlY4NVI�bUSV �� i� ,� l Ulna '� w� �, 7�'��r �� � '�" m' �� v i t �: �„ �i ti��, �„� �y� - , �,,� �� 4 , ( lYJ9//�� .l i�ap �,�,'I,,�'. /, id,,, b y�y� %� y p� � � v �� � J o ry , 3 J � / K,, pfijG,5 l �� �A �� s �%� �t �,,,; , �i.. ���r i ,, ,,� �. �, fl I' "ii�„ � I �/ � k1 � � �,�' i ��4u1� Y1���!uh9 �i f Mkt B11VA@40�Y�N IIVIIW�'�'� N'�Wi�"�;5�91�rrMIlU1N11�, �(64i�,tiM14�111A@11USUWl�I I$}I�,GIII � I �« S yQ0 �1�ti. C U J � I l�a �� �"ql� 11pp�� Q) c Lf) -o >) _ -o 4- Q) 5 _�n -o c s c7 O 'n O u s C O -C C C o ' Q) U M CL O C J C C C O M ro o - o Ln u ° - U Cd- °C ro sLf) U °J 0 ° E Ln c7 co CL o Ln r- O 0 E ° _ 4- 0 CL � CL 0 d c W CL s 4_ CL CU, co ° co ° u 3 U O O 'n CL c ..4 N C -, N N co CL _ s � CO C c C CO -C U, v) N O -v) -C '_' -C -4-, - CL C CO -C ° s v) RS Ln 01 CL C r0 - C 0) ' o O U 4- co R3 r0 co 4 0) o CoC - U ..� O 0) C s c Q) 0 0 ° ro C U O ; C 0) U O 4- Co CL ° u Lf) '-' N '-' Co U -S Co s 0) �Co Ln 0 C -O -0 _0d -C E N O _- Co OJ C O :-.f N ..0 r0 0 -4 U- ro CL r0 D ro -d C -d r0 C u ro S r0 N °1 O ..0 ..0 Q) C OJ '� Ln O ° _C_ C 0 0 0 s r0 p O ° s v) N U c ro s O N 'n ..0 U C C7 5 -0 c CO Ln Ol N O rc OJ N C O _ �- V7 °1 N ..� C C _O 4 O S -C 5 ro 01 C co -C 0 -C -4�, CO1 ° D (r7 C Q) V) C '-' C CL Z7 ° -C OJ O S 0) LE -4-, -4- CL C -C CL c) - C o 0 0 O 0 O o 0 4{- 0 ° C E — °) ..� s CL Oj — O -(0 -� U N C�co _ � N N C Co C Q) Q) C -4-, C CL CL ri C V o C r D- co � � F �-, C � s Q) E � � C ro 01 C CL � CL O O 0) S ro ro -4-, 'n 4+- U C -C7 cL O CL ° C) °' RS D Q � 0 C z7 s s +_, J 4- Q) Ln o v o 0 0 u C o ro 0) u - v o c D CJ C O ry .C - CL N � s CJ N C7 rc 0 C O v) f c E c U o � ; C c rc co -0 s D CL coo c o o v) ccoo c ° CL -� U) Lw D- U I �{ -, l � ,A". � � ,,,,,,, ll f�„ FF �I ( M it � r%� Ia��s �, � ��� � r F i � ' ��, .' I!, (; ��� ,., �� f 4 �;,` i � � f � �i ,� �I �' ; /�' I/�` �. �, � ,r ,. Y ,, � � �- �� IIII 1 � ���� � '� �� � Y � � S� ��J�, �< r f �,� �`;I � �°q'�+ �� I i � I n, i �'4 0 �r r, ,�� 1 i�, ;° n r� ,I U� ���J� , y��b�� I!��i T� �! l � � v'°� ,'�, ,, ,� „.. i� �� ,:" III sr <r'. r„ ; �.. ,r � ;, I,,�� , � � �� '�, r �f „�' y a. 1 ", q'��� � �r �/ f '� '� '� � ,,,, � �, ;; 1 �;; d �I � �,, I �, :1 �� � I .;�{I�� � q4e��� Y � .. ;� �` � �� r +t �;» �" � I,; �ir:: ''� r. � ' �. 1 � ` I�,; „f ,� ," g P-` i, 'f +,i u' � ,i i� { �,. �i /: 1 r r /G II J 6 y� y u: f fi 1,r; � a i iii i' r g i � � � ' �a, � ��� 1 �' �� 'Y�y <i �i � �� 7 ��� m� P �� 1 � � � � i r � ,� �; PP11� r a �I�r9f ;�l%/ 1 ) 5i � � k I fi �' Il� b 1 1 f J � �/� ail °� J G ++II'��' V p. �� � � i� J � �h I 'c��� � W. ��/' �YI � N'. r f rypy n //1 a � �, �' >�� Nf ��f� ir; � �� �, �r �J !- r` i it ��-, u6�1� ,� 1 � �� '!k4 �Ul '��„ �� b) v+� ^�„� �� 1 � t,n � � ��� � � j �� � � ��'� �r � " �Dili ,�d�, i a� +�� r � ��, i �o is �° 4, ���,� � � �, j +� 9' � �� i � �� �� � � � ��' ��, ���� t �� y ����� �, , �, � �, �, �d +E `�� l �b � ,1 � �� ��;i d� ,, �i , 1 "� V !i �� a �,, � �y� ;r,� � I � � l �� � ����� j r J/ � � r�, �, i� �� �� �� 7,i �� 1 �bY �f i f A ��' �, U, Irf w� �� h �' � i 1; r �� a �al� cf„� „i uu � �h' i v I�i r: i4� 1 �r I � *' i r, i '9 q'x i N T- r J, � Jp j ry r 6 ` I et t r 16, U r r , t 1 f I ff� M T- M M i i +�1 l� O cld November 28, 2023 �° Y(rA 1jk Florida Department of Transportation Maralkon Transportation Alternatives Grant Committee IPdti:: tril � r 605 Suwannee St. Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: City of Marathon Coco Plum Dr Projects Dear Selection Committee, The Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce is committed to both our business and individual communities. We not only promote the City as a destination for visitors, but also to those who would like to become residents, open and/or relocate business (es); as well as engage in initiatives and programs that will support, benefit, and empower our business community. This letter is to express support from the Chamber for the City of Marathon's application to fund the completion of the multi-use path on Coco Plum Drive and add lighting to the path. This path was started in 2008 with the last section being completed in 2014. Many visitors and residents use the existing path but are forced to walk on the road to complete the "loop" of Coco Plum Drive. The addition of lighting along Coco Plum Drive has been long needed. With Coco Plum Beach being a turtle nesting beach, turtle friendly lighting in this area is essential. Lighting will enhance the neighborhood and bring added safety to what is a very popular walking/biking bath. Completion of the multi-use path and the added lighting will ensure the safety of cyclists and pedestrians and will be of great benefit to our community. I appreciate your attention to this letter, and I am hopeful to see this project move forward. Sincerely, � �y Daniel Samess, M.S. Chief Executive Officer Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce ceo@floridakevsmarathon.com (305) 289-5848 12222 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY-d'v1ARAH-fopq,FLORiDA KExs 33050-(305) 743-6417-FAX(305)289-0183 4(800)262 7284 E-mail:visitus@ FlcrridaKaysMarathon.core-www.RoridaKeysMarattromc o n 59 of 9(,3315 City of Marathon Planning Department 9805 Overseas Highway Marathon, FL 33050 Michele Safos 150 Coco Plum Dr. Slip #19 Marathon, FL 33050 November 20, 2023 Dear Mr. Shea, I am writing to express my support for an extension to the bike path on Coco Plum Drive. My elderly husband and I use the path almost daily in an effort to catch the sunrise at the end of Coco Plum. It would be wonderful if this bike path could be extended and low level lighting be added along the way. Navigation is scary after the bike path ends and will be more dangerous as the tourists begin to arrive. Thank you for this consideration. I feel certain it will be beneficial for all those who enjoy this path. Kindest Regards, Dionisios Safos Michele Safos 60 of 9(,3316 Marde and Stanley Jobe 125 Coco Plum Drive Darathon, Florida 33050 To: Florida Department of Transportation Re: In support of City of Marathon grant applications for the extension of the walking path and path lights Dear Sirs and Madams: I am writing this letter in support of the extension of the walking and bicycle path and the installation of lights on Coco Plum Drive in Marathon, Florida. It is my understanding the City of Marathon is applying for grants for the funding of these related projects. My husband and I own a family home on Coco Plum Drive and we own and operate a small local business as well with 4 full time employees. Our family and employees use the walking/biking path on Coco Plum Drive often and enjoy the outdoor space and activities. Coco Plum Drive is a dead end street with a cul de sac that ends at the ocean. The problem for walking and biking is that the current path does not extend to the end of the street. It stops randomly in the middle. Thus, if a person wants to go to the end for exercise and ocean viewing, whether walking or biking,you are in the street for a good portion of the way. It is unsafe and hazardous to walkers and bikers and motorists. Coco Plum Drive does not have paved shoulders and the lanes are very narrow. Therefore, the path is very important to the safety of everyone on the street regardless of their mode of travel. The Jobe family requests that the Department approve the City of Marathon's funding and grant requests for these important Coco Plum safety projects. Sincerely, Martie Jobe 61 of 9(,3317 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Path Extension and Upgrades Bgpg[! I['Hs lf.niaHl Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Cheryl Miller<clmiller509@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 6:04 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: savecocoplum@aol.com Subject: Coco Plum Bike Path Extension and Upgrades Dear Mr. Brian Shea, I live at 95 Coco Plum Drive, Unit 5A, in the City of Marathon, and I am writing to express my support for the City of Marathon's efforts to extend the Coco Plum Drive bike path to the end of the road.This will increase the safety of the cyclists, walkers and runners who all travel along Coco Plum Drive. In an effort to further increase safety, I encourage the City to add (nesting-turtle-friendly) lighting to the path and add a curb or ballasts along the road to prevent vehicles from driving onto the bike path. Vehicles entering the bike path is a particular concern at the 90 degree bend of Coco Plum Drive between Pescayo Avenue and Avenue C. As the Coco Plum population continues to grow with nearly 200 residential dwellings just added (single family homes on Pescayo Avenue and Avenue D) or under construction (Seaview Commons I and 11),the vehicular traffic on Coco Plum Drive will increase. Now is the time to extend and improve the Coco Plum bike path, ensuring safety of current and future residents. Sincerely, Cheryl Miller pop i 62 of 9C3318 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:57 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum improvements I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Kim Kenney<kim.d.ken ney@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:53 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: Kim Kenney<kimdkenney@gmail.com> Subject: Coco Plum improvements Dear Brian, I am writing on behalf of my mother who owns a townhome and two slips at Bonefish. My parents have been owners since the development began and as such we have spent a lot of time as a family in Marathon and Coco Plum. Prior to owning at Bonefish we stayed on Key Colony. Suffice it to say the area is special to our family. My mom is in poor health so I am managing the properties and her correspondence as her POA.As such, I would like to express support for the proposed extension of the bike trail and low lighting along Coco Plum drive. We walk and bike this area regularly when in town and have often commented how nice it would be to have sidewalk the whole way down as well as subtle lighting. I believe such a project would enhance property values and more importantly he an important safety improvement. I hope it moves forward. Sincerely, Kimberly Kenney agent under POA for Sue F. Dickes 96 Avenue C#1 Marathon i 63 of 9(,3319 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:51 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Trail Extension I['Ns lf.:i iai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°II�ghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: MARGARET WRIGHT<dsmkeys@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 1:56 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Bike Trail Extension We have been waiting a long time for the completion of the Bike Trail on Coco Plum Drive. This is a lovely walk/ride to the end, but, at this time, it isn't safe because of lack of lighting and the drop off on each side of the road. It will be wonderful to have a safe path. Thank you for your efforts to make this happen for both the residents and visitors to Coco Plum. Dee Wright 130 Coco Plum Drive Marathon, FL 1 64 of 9(,3320 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Drive bike path extension and lighting Bgpg[! I['Ns lf.niap l Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°II�ghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From:gacourter@comcast.net<gacourter@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:39 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Drive bike path extension and lighting Hello Brian, We are excited that an extension to the Coco Plum bike path and installation of turtle-safe lighting are being considered for grant requests! As Ave D residents, we use the bike path daily, especially when walking our dog. It's a lovely path, used by residents and vacationers alike, and extending it to the end of the drive would be fantastic! Aside from the enjoyment factor, it is almost a necessary improvement. Unfortunately, Coco Plum Drive has become somewhat of a speedway and an extension of the bike path should be considered a necessary safety improvement. Likewise, lighting should also be considered a critical and necessary safety improvement, especially needed during the winter months due to the early sunset time. We truly hope these projects will be eligible for grants and thank you for your efforts on behalf of our lovely community! Bet regards, Gail &Glenn Courter 1 65 of 9(,3321 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:58 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Improvement of Coco Plum walking trail I['Ns if.:i i ai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°II�ghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From:Woody Hodgkins<woodyhog@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 16, 2023 9:29 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Improvement of Coco Plum walking trail I wholeheartedly support the plan to improve the walking/biking trail on Coco Plum Drive. Many of our guests and residents make that walk a part of their daily exercise routine. i 66 of 9(,3322 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:57 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Trail extension and Lighting I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Pamela Mayberry<pam.mayberry@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:55 AM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Fwd:Trail extension and Lighting ---------- Forwarded message--------- From: Pamela Mayberry<pam.mayberry@gmail.com> Date:Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:45 AM Subject:Trail extension and Lighting To: Lynda &Jack Berrigan <Savecocoplum@aol.com> Dear Lynda, Wade and I enthusiastically support the efforts to fund the extension of the bike/walk Trail to the end of CoCo Plum Drive and the addition of lighting. Many of CoCo Plum residents have continually asked why it was never taken to the Point and we have brought it up at several annual Save CoCo Plum meetings. With all the additional development on CoCo Plum,this trail's popularity will continue to grow and therefore increase the potential for incidents as there will be more people walking, biking and driving on the road past the current ending of the trail to the end of CoCo Plum for the magnificent view. And since evening time is typically cooler, lighting will also help alleviate someone being hit at dusk. I would also like to point out that the destruction from Huricane Irma (9/2017)to the end of the CoCo Plum has still not been repaired. It would seem to me that this could also be included in the request to the FDOT, since much of the necessary equipment will already be on sight. i 67 of 9(,3323 Thank you for your continued support for the residents of CoCo Plum. Pam &Wade Mayberry 2 68 of 9C3324 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 1:58 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Attachments: Gold team logo.pdf Ilw, ;g fp.Ej.....F.I�.�.s....If.nC!ia� Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°II�ghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...1:L:L2 f sheab@ J.marathon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fLus From:Jacqueline Adorno <jadorno@comcast.net> Sent:Thursday, November 16, 2023 12:22 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: lynda Marathon Coco Plum Association <savecocoplum@aol.com> Subject: Coco Plum Brian Shea, I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to bring your attention to a project that aims to enhance the quality of life in our neighborhood by finishing the sidewalks that will allow residents to fully enjoy the natural beauty that surrounds us. Our neighborhood is blessed with an abundance of nature. It is a haven for those seeking solace in the great outdoors, and a place where families come together to create lasting memories. However, the lack of proper sidewalks poses a significant challenge for residents who wish to explore and appreciate the natural wonders that lie just beyond their doorsteps. By investing in the creation of finishing the sidewalks,we can provide a safe and accessible pathway for residents of all ages to immerse themselves in the beauty of our neighborhood.These sidewalks will not only encourage physical activity and promote a healthier lifestyle but will also foster a sense of community and connection among our residents. The benefits of this project extend far beyond mere convenience. With the finishing of sidewalks, we will witness an increase in foot traffic, leading to a stronger sense of security and a decrease in crime rates. Additionally, the sidewalks will provide a safer route for children to walk to school, reducing the reliance on cars and promoting sustainable transportation. 1 69 of 9(,3325 We understand that funding such a project requires a significant investment, but we believe that the long-term benefits far outweigh the initial costs. We have already secured support from local businesses, community organizations, and residents who are eager to contribute their time and resources to make this vision a reality. In conclusion, we kindly request your consideration for a grant to fund the creation of new sidewalks in our neighborhood. We firmly believe that this project will not only enhance the quality of life for our residents but also serve as a model for other communities looking to prioritize nature and promote a healthier lifestyle. Thank you for your time and consideration. We eagerly await your positive response and the opportunity to work together in transforming our neighborhood into a haven for walking enjoyment. Sincerely, Resident of 112 Avenue E Marathon Florida 33050 Jacqueline Adorno REALTOR iadorno@comcast.net Long and Foster Real Estate 1109 E Baltimore Pike Suite E Media, Pa. 19063 Tri County Suburban Realtors Association Realtor Lic#RS293281 Also licensed in NJ#2190990 (office) 610-892-8300 (cell) 610-662-0556 Accredited Designations ABR SFR ALHS SRS .https:Hvimeo.com/259032849 ALIU t ,e d'L Home�Nli� u�i�i h 5�peAalllsi ALERT! Long &Foster Real Estate will never send you wiring information via email or request that you send us personal financial information by email. If you receive an email message like this concerning any transaction involving Long &Foster Real Estate, do not respond to the email and immediately contact your agent via phone. The contents of this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this message or any attachment by you is strictly prohibited. If you 2 70 of K3326 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:02 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Extension of Bike Path and low level lighting Coco Plum Attachments: New Bike Path Coco Plum.docx Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°Hghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203... :L:L2 f sheab@ J.marafhon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Michele Safos<michelesafos@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 2:21 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Extension of Bike Path and low level lighting Coco Plum Good afternoon, Mr Shea, I am attaching a letter of support from my husband and me for the support of the bike path. We are daily users. I do not have the technology to print and sign this, but let me know if this is not acceptable and I will find a way to get the signatures added. Kindest regards, Michele Safos i 71 of 9(,3327 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:33 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: FDOT Grant I['Ns lf.:i iai Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°II�ghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Eric Viehman <Vman1098NR@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 9:24 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Cc: Lynda Berrigan <savecocoplum@aol.com> Subject: FDOT Grant Sea n, It has come to my attention that you are looking for support regarding your grant application with FDOT to extend the bike path on Coco Plum Dr to the end. I have advocated for this extension for 20 yrs as that is when my wife and I retired and moved to Coco Plum. We are walkers and have walked Coco Plum Dr to the end daily for years. Our walks would last for about an hour as we often would take in the ocean view while sitting on the park bench. Need a few more benches by the way. On busy days we have passed 30+ individuals walking to the end as well, some with children on bikes. The bike path extension would create a safer zone for walkers, bikers and joggers. I also like your lighting idea as well. Any improvements are welcome. I have been a cheerleader regarding the beautification of the median areas on Over Seas Highway, the boat ramp/parking next to the Island and the bike path on Aviation Blvd. Looks great and I applaud the efforts the city has made in this area. I want to thank you for your attempt to secure this grant. Eric Viehman i 72 of 9(,3328 150 Coco Plum #16 Marathon, FL 33050 vmanl093nr@msn.com 2 73 of 9(,3329 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 1:04 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Letter in Support of Coco Plum Walking Path Grant Applications Attachments: November 2023 Letter in Support of City of Marthon Grants.docx Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°II�ghway ` arathon IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...1:L:L2 f sheab@ J.marathon.fl.us I www.ci.marathon.fLus From: Martie Jobe<martie@jobeco.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 12:34 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Letter in Support of Coco Plum Walking Path Grant Applications Brian: Thanks for meeting with us today. We really appreciate your time. Attached is a letter in support of the grants that the City is submitting for Coco Plum Drive. Have a Happy Thanksgiving! Martie Jobe 1 74 of 9(,3330 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 8:35 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Lighting coco plum bike path If1Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 9805 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...289...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: sonya margiotta <samkeys09@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 6:38 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Lighting coco plum bike path I think that having lighting on the bike path would make it safer for everyone . I wholly support this idea. Sonya Margiotta 95 Coco plum dr Marathon, FI 1 75 of 9(,3331 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:15 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Project support Bgpg[! I['Hs lf.niaHl Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 3005 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Rich Fuller<rfuller101@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:15 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Project support Hi Brian, I'm writing to let you know that we support the project to extend the bike trail to the end of Coco Plum Drive and we support adding lights to the existing trail and the new proposed extension.Thanks, We're the owners of Royal Plum unit 4 at 133 Coco Plum Drive. Pilch IFLullll&' 1727 460 5307 1 76 of 9(,3332 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:34 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: coco plum drive bike path If1Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFNI City of Marathon I Planning Department 3003 Overseas II°Hghway ` airathon IC: II... 33050 Office 303...203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marafhon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Don Dubois<rosie20l43@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:06 AM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: coco plum drive bike path Dear Brian Shea, I agree the bath path and lighting should be completed as soon as possible for it has been a project way over due. I ride my bike every day and would enjoy the extension of the path to the roads end. Currently it is a dangerous piece of road with speeders and disrepair to the shoulders on both sides. Thankyou, Donald DuBois CPBYC, Slip 7 Ave I Marathon, FL> 1 77 of 9(,3333 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 2:08 PM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Coco Plum Bike Trail and Lighting extension I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°Hghway larathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fLus From: dianemernal@gmail.com <dianemernal@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 28, 2023 12:42 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Coco Plum Bike Trail and Lighting extension Dear Mr. Shea: I am unable to attend the meeting tonight because I went to IL for the holidays. But I wanted you to know that I walk on Coco Plum Drive every day but only up to the point that the sidewalk ends. For safety reasons, I am not comfortable walking on the street. I would encourage you to apply for funding to extend the sidewalk and add lights down to the POINT. I feel this would be a real positive step for Coco Plum Drive. Lighting and sidewalks would be a vast improvement because the traffic is not heavily policed on Coco Plum the way it is in Key Colony Beach and the drivers do not obey the speed limit or other safety provisions. Sidewalks and lighting are sorely needed.Thank you.Also the website states the meeting for tonight is cancelled. What is that all about? Diane Merna Bonefish Towers-Apt. 401 2000 Coco Plum Drive Marathon, FL 33050 630-399-1380 1 78 of 9(,3334 Maria Covelli From: Brian Shea Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:44 AM To: Maria Covelli Subject: FW: Bike path extension I['Hs lf.:i iaH Sincerely, Planning Director, AICP CFM City of Marathon I Planning Department 9803 Overseas II°Hghway lairathon, IC: II... 33050 Office 305 203...�: 2 f sheab@d.marathon.fl.us www.ci.marathon.fl.us From: Olek Muszynski <Olek@eighthday.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2023 6:24 PM To: Brian Shea <Sheab@ci.marathon.f1.us> Subject: Bike path extension I understand that the City is applying for grant to fund design and construction of bike path extension on Cocoplum. The purpose of this letter is to express our full support of this effort. Carol and I are full time residents of the Cocoplum subdivision and users of bike path . Extension will be an improvement to quality of life in the neighborhood as well as the safety of the residents as well as tourists. We would love to see the design of the extension to consider following items ; 1. Low amber path lights or no lights at all. As it is there is too ma y lights polluting night sky in the area. 2. Design improvement to the median between the path and the roadway. Current medians along Cocoplum are devastated by cars driving or parking over them. 3. Introduction of elevated path with balustrades ( kind you see in state and national parks constructed with pt lumber or trex) Perhaps solar power lights can be located under the top rails. Opportunity to introduce these elevated sections exists between Ave K and O in areas void of houses. Depth of City right of way at these blocks offers opportunity to make path more interesting by slightly curving it away from the roadway. 4. Much needed repairs of the road shoulder need to be budgeted in to this project. Shoulders washed out during Irma are in many places 12" lower than roadway with chunks of asphalt crumbling in accelerated pace. 5.Just in case the grant will end up excessively large Q- Long shot idea of routing elevated path through the wet land between the beach and Cocoplum . Olek snd Carol Muszynski 104 Avenue L 1 79 of 9(,3335 REQUIRED UIPLOAD., CONQUIRRIENICY P CONSISTENCY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (e.g., supporting resolution(s),excerpt from comprehensive plan(s),transportation plan(s),capital improvement plan(s�, mana,gement p1lan(s),pdaritizahon lli:st,etc.). Please see following for Resolution: so of 9C 3336 Sponsored by: Puto CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA RESOLUTION 2008-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, AGREEING TO ADD THE COCO PLUM RECREATION TRAIL PROJECT TO THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IF THE CITY OF MARATHON IS AWARDED AN FY 2008 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT FOR THE PROJECT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (the "DEP") awards Recreational Trail Program Grants to build and improve recreation trails. WHEREAS, the City of Marathon (the "City") will submit a grant application to DEP to acquire funds to renovate the Coco Plum Recreation Trail. WHEREAS,the City has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to add the Coco Plum Recreation Trail Upgrade to its Five Year Capital Improvement Program if it is awarded a Fiscal Year 2008 Recreational Trails Program Grant for the project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein. Section 2. The City Council hereby agrees to add the Coco Plum Recreation Trail Upgrade to the City of Marathon Five Year Capital Improvement Program if the City is awarded a DEP Recreational Trail Program grant for the project. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 3337 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Marathon,Florida,this 25th day of March 2008. THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA �/I ew-7 Edward P. Worthington, Ma or AYES: Bull, Cinque, Tempest, Vasil, Worthington NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: 1aJ, y� Diane Clavier City Clerk (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY FOR THE USE AND RELIANCE OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA ONLY: City Attorney 3338 REQUIRED UIPILGAD for Infwastructure (not applitalble for Nl)- ENIVIROMM ENTAIL,CONDITIONS 5it PIPORTING DOCUIMENTAT10IN (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits,copy ofthe entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans,etc.). Current Conditions:This project is adjacent to already developed, scarified land. Please see the following for a conditions map. Permits through outside agencies to be determined (ACOE, DEP, SFWMD). ew Lighting P-posed s3 of 9(,3339 REQUIRED UIPLOAD for Infrastructure (not appfloable for NII), OWNERSHIP I ROVI STATUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION including applicable ROW Certification including ownership verification documenting We control)and related landowner supporting documentation.Site control documents must include an adequate legal description of the parcell(s)comprising the project site, such that staff can compare it to the boundary map submitted with the application and evaluate whether there Is control of the project site(e.g., ROW Certification, ROW maps, plats,warranty deeds, prescriptions,certlified surveys,easements,use agreement,etc.).Malips,should clearly show the location of each ownership In relation to the project boundary and I or fimits. NOTE provide map documentation on 8,5"x 1111'scale. DO NOT provide iredurced coples of original plats and or maps that cannot be read at scale. Ilf applicable,an exhibit visually depicting the new ROW anticipated for the project,together with a spreadsheet proOdl�ng the tax Identification number(s)of each imparted parcel and the approximate size of the new acquisition area,for each Impacted parcel. Please see following for Ownership/ROW Status: 84 of 9C 3340 VIU� �°�ONTY Monroe County, FL UNI2UE CU , t Overview Legend Major Roads v II u`^ I iy 1 Centerline Easements K,. wr Hooks Lot Lines Road Center Rights of Way Shoreline Key Names k �r f' r s I A,— Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Alternate ID 1449946 Owner Address CITY OF MARATHON Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Class RIGHT OF WAY 9805 Overseas Hwy Property Address VACANT LAND Marathon,FL 33050 MARATHON District 50CM Brief Tax Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P64-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC (11'^JoLP-1 II"JoL Lo Ibo a usod oii n IIrgalll docu uimcaii ft) Date created:11/29/2023 Last Data Uploaded:11/2 9/202 3 4:04:26 AM Developed bySchneider 85 of 9C3341 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Monroe County, FL Disclaimer The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office maintains data on property within the County solely for the purpose of fulfilling its responsibility to secure a just valuation for ad valorem tax purposes of all property within the County.The Monroe County Property Appraiser's office cannot guarantee its accuracy for any other purpose.Likewise,data provided regarding one tax year may not be applicable in prior or subsequent years.By requesting such data,you hereby understand and agree that the data is intended for ad valorem tax purposes only and should not be relied on for any other purpose. By continuing into this site you assert that you have read and agree to the above statement. Summary Parcel ID 00366780-000000 Account# 1449946 Property ID 1449946 MillageGroup 50CM Location Address VACANT LAND,MARATHON Legal Description PLAT OF ROAD SURVEY P134-81 FAT DEER KEY ROAD(COCO PULM DRIVE)OR1707-1814/15QC �aalaa:II'4W laa Ilya,w,ud ouii Ilu.a gall da cuilina.inil',r,J Neighborhood 10041 Property Class RIGHT OF WAY(9400) Subdivision Sec/Twp/Rng 03/66/33 Affordable Housing No Owner a:;Irlry;::�11 Irnlr fro-{;::�Ir ...................................................... 9805 Overseas Hwy Marathon FL 33050 Valuation 2023 Certified Values 2022 Certified Values 2021 Certified Values 2020 Certified Values + Market Improvement Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Misc Value $0 $0 $0 $0 + Market Land Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Just Market Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 = Total Assessed Value $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 School Exempt Value ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) ($6,250) = School Taxable Value $0 $0 $0 $0 Historical Assessments Year Land Value Building Value Yard Item Value Just(Market)Value Assessed Value Exempt Value Taxable Value Maximum Portability 2022 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2021 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2020 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2019 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 2018 $6,250 $0 $0 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $0 Iic II`n1,�a;nlltrimruin I vane L;I llIIulu ir,iuiii ud luirinala oiiiIls uiiid°J-io.rd iniaal be i' 11iud rpnanru�lII lu iaaa.mlll Vpoiu Mb lIRy urino uiniL 4 oi[il ia: on WI icu Wvo.ufu lII iu H bmll Vpoiu MlLyoIIulu�irinoia iiL Land Land Use Number of Units Unit Type Frontage Depth (8600) 1.00 Lot 0 0 View Tax I nfo View axes'ftn LIhiis Ilaircell ......................................................... 3342 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 86 of 9(, „� 11/29/23,9:02 AM gPublic.net-Monroe County, FL-Report:00366780-000000 Map 1 N I No data available for the following modules:Buildings,Yard Items,Sales,Permits,Sketches(click to enlarge),Photos,TRIM Notice. Schneider GCJ5 PAT IY4L U.Yr e it II°iriivyc 111 slIlia,v G I blFIR II°iri pa y Notice gsa,1 a pa p u�1i�il�p p� e��� aJ of 04 26A IV 3343 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=605&LayerlD=9946&PageTypelD=4&PageID=7635&KeyValue=00366780-000000 870 9( , Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside(TA) ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE Financial Management Number(if applicable): Project Description: Items TA Eligible Other Funds(must include all TA ineligible items) TOTAL Engineer's Engineer's Subtotal Engineer's Engineer's Subtotal Total Pay Item Number* Pay Item Descrl ption* Qua n[i[y Unit Unit Cost Cost(TA funds) Qua n[i[y Unl[ Unit Cost Cost(other funds) Sources)of Match Quantity Total Engineer's Cos[ 1 Engineering 1 ITS $60,000,00 $ 60,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 60,000,00 2 Bonds,nsurance,Taxes,etc 1 ITS $35,000,00 $ 35,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 35,000,00 3 Moblllzatlon 1 ITS $40,000,00 $ 40,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 40,000,00 4 Maintenance of Traffic 1 ITS $ 12000,00 $ 12,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 12,000,00 5 Permitting 1 ITS$ 8,000,00 $ 8,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 8,000,00 6 Site Work 1 ITS $26,000,00 $ 26,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 26,000,00 Pedestrlan Lights Co mplete 63 EA$ 8,200,00 $ 516,600.00 EA $ - 63 $ 516,600,00 8 Pull Boxes 63 EA $ 450,00 $ 28,350.00 EA $ - 63 $ 28,350,00 9 Electrical Conduit 4650 LF $ 27,00 $ 125,550.00 EA $ - 4650 $ 125,550,00 10 Conductor 4650 LF $ 11,00 $ 51,150.00 EA $ - 4650 $ 51,150,00 11 Electric Service Connections 2 EA $ 11,000,00 $ 22,000.00 EA $ - 2 $ 22,000,00 12 Rctroad.,, 1 ITS $ 18,000,00 $ 18,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 18,000,00 13 As Bul its 1 ITS $ 14,000,00 $ 14,000.00 EA $ - 1 $ 14,000,00 EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ EA $ - EA $ - 0 $ TA Eligible Costs/TA Funds Requested Other Funds (not funded through other sources) 5 956,650.00 (mart include TA Ineligible Costs) 5 Subtotal $ 956,650.00 Design Cost $ - CEI Cost $60,000 $ CONTINGENCY(REQUIRED) Contingency is not a FHWA Participating Item 15% $ Total Cost Estimate $ 5 $ A reasonable estimate of project costs is required.Projects must follow appropriate design criteria and meet Americans with Disabilities Act requl rements.Projects on the State Highway System,and"on-system"(on FDOT land),and Critical Projects shall utilize FDOT pay 1[ems umbers and descriptions.FDOT'S AWARD OF FUNDING TO THE APPLICANT'S PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF PARTICIPATING VS.NON-PARTICIPATING ITEMS IDENTIFIED IN THIS COST ESTIMATE.Funding pay items and eligibility will be discussed during project development. 42758 Prepared by: PE Number: ExampLE&Npnparticipatagitems Carlos A.Solis,P.E. 12-6-23 Mow ng,ltter removal,opt onal sery ces;vdeo'nspec[on;ut lity d'rec[onal bore/utility agency owner d'rec[onal bores; "' '- IIzte: -------- Utility work,including but not llmlted to valve adjustments,utl llty relocations,power pole relocations, Name: Signature: Con[ngency Other elements may be aon-partrcrpatruly,the ones listed abovearenan partrcating commonly used pay items. Reviewed by: If Vou have questions regarding an eligible or non-particl paring l[em,Dls[rlc[represen[atives may be contacted for guidance. Date: Name: Signature: References: FDOT Design httos://www.fdoteo v/roadway Environmental Management httos://www.fdot.z,ov/environment FDOT Estimates htt s w.fdot.o ent estimates documents Local Programs Manual htt s. —fdot.o gent la la toc.shtm TA Set-Aside Program htt s w.fdot..o tannin nsa nos s stems m ent to ss of 3344 REQUIRED UIPILGAD for Infwastructure (not applitalble foIr Nl)- ENIVIRGINM ENTAIL,CONDITIONS 5it PIPORTING DIOCUIMENTAT10IN (e.g., labeled photographs on maps depicting conditions, permits,copy ofthe entire study or environmental assessment, excerpt pages from adopted plans,etc.). Current Conditions:This project is adjacent to already developed, scarified land. Please see the following for a conditions map. Permits through outside agencies to be determined (ACOE, DEP, SFWMD). fin,; ��u � Light! .............. INS 1,110112S M, 1 / %iio 89 of 9(,3345 r / I� lrr f / r / ��II�I�I�II�Nr�fVl@ulrudY�n�anR.,._ l'" �� �i e,�l �1 i 1,�` ('1 ✓�il, ,� � r Mu u r lr 90 of 9C3346 -n 3 % µ 5 6 7 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9 RESOLUTION NO. -2024 10 11 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 12 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 13 APPROVING PRIORITIZATION OF THE 14 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES APPLICATIONS 15 SUBMITTED FOR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 16 TRANSPORTATION - 2024 TRANSPORTATION 17 ALTERNATIVES GRANT PROGRAM. 18 19 20 WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") opened the 2024 21 Transportation Alternatives grant program and announced the application cycle on November 6, 22 2023; and 23 24 WHEREAS, the Transportation Alternatives ("TA") grant program provides federal 25 funding available for non-motorized transportation and is administered by the FDOT; and 26 27 WHEREAS, the FDOT requires local priority rankings be approved by the Monroe 28 County Board of County Commissioners as part of the application process; and 29 30 WHEREAS, five applications were submitted for consideration for funding by FDOT: 31 ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, City of Key Colony Beach; 32 requesting $133,212; Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity, City of Key West, requesting $52,590.56; 33 Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan, City of Key West, requesting $160,000; 34 Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting Addition, City of 35 Marathon, request: $ 1,000,000; Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path, City of 36 Marathon, request: $ 956,650; and 37 38 WHEREAS, a committee consisting of representatives from Monroe County, evaluated 39 the application(s)based on the FDOT's required criteria; and 40 41 WHEREAS, the score of the 2024 application is based on an overall 125-point scale, 42 The City of Marathon Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting 43 Addition received an overall average score of 86.8 and a final score of 111.8 with final 44 prioritization points; City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity received an overall average 45 score of 78 and a final score of 102 with final prioritization points; City of Marathon Coco Plum 46 Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path received an overall average score of 71.5 and a final 47 score of 94.5 with final prioritization points; City of Key West Island Wide Comprehensive 48 Wayfinding Plan received an overall average score of 70 and a final score of 92 with final 49 prioritization points; and City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public 1 of 3 3347 1 Parks and Paths, Invasive Species removal received an overall average score of 65.3 and a final 2 score of 86.3 with final prioritization points; and 3 4 WHEREAS, given the average scores, the committee recommended City of Marathon 5 Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting Addition receive a 6 ranking of 1; City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity receive a ranking of 2; City of 7 Marathon Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path receive a ranking of 3; City of 8 Key West Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan receive a ranking of 4; City of Key 9 Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, Invasive Species 10 removal receive a ranking of 5; and 11 12 WHEREAS,based on committee scoring the recommended rankings are as follows: 13 14 1. City of Marathon Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around with Lighting 15 Addition 16 2. City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity 17 3. City of Marathon Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path 18 4. City of Key West Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan 19 5. City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks and Paths, 20 Invasive Species removal 21 22 WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled duly noticed public hearing, the Board considered 23 comments from citizens wishing to speak on the matter; and 24 25 WHEREAS,the Board fully supports the funding of the application(s); 26 27 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 28 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: 29 30 1. The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners ("Monroe County", the 31 "County", "Board", or "BOCC") hereby approves prioritization of the 2024 Transportation 32 Alternatives applications as follows: 33 34 1. City of Marathon Completion of Coco Plum Multi Use Path/Turn-Around 35 with Lighting Addition—Requesting $ 1,000,000. 36 2. City of Key West Enhancing Bus Bike Capacity - Requesting $52,590.56 37 3. City of Marathon Coco Plum Drive Lighting at Existing Multi-Use Path - 38 requesting $956,650 39 4. City of Key West Island Wide Comprehensive Wayfinding Plan — 40 Requesting $160,000 41 5. City of Key Colony Beach ADA and Safety Improvements for Public Parks 42 and Paths, Invasive Species removal —Requesting $133,212 43 44 2. Monroe County requests that the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") 45 provide Transportation Alternative ("TA") funds to the subject projects in the fifth 46 year of the upcoming FDOT District Six Tentative Work Program (2030) for Monroe 477 County as requested by the applicants. 48 49 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, 50 Florida, at a regular public meeting of the Board held on the 3 1" day of January 2024. 51 52 2of3 3348 I Mayor Holly Merrill Raschein 2 Mayor Pro Tem James K. Scholl 3 Commissioner Craig Cates 4 Commissioner Michelle Lincoln 5 Commissioner David Rice 6 7 8 9 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10 OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 11 12 13 BY: 14 (SEAL) MAYOR HOLLY MERRILL RASCHEIN 15 16 N E COUNTY ATTORNEY 17 APB T , I 18 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK 19 20 21 By 22 AS DEPUTY CLERK 23 24 3 of 3 3349