HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem C11 C11
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY of MONROE Mayor James K.Scholl,District 3
The Florida Keys Mayor Pro Tern Michelle Lincoln,District 2
Craig Cates,District 1
David Rice,District 4
Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
August 20, 2025
Agenda Item Number: C 11
2023-4308
BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Facilities Maintenance
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Wilson
No
AGENDA ITEM WORDING:
Approval of an Agreement with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for required
site rehabilitation activities at the fuel site previously located at the Plantation Key Government Center
and approval for the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator to execute and submit the
"Cost Share Site Contractor Recommendation Sheet" to FDEP. The FDEP contractor agrees to reduce
their rates by 25% to cover what would be local match requirement. There is no cost to the County.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
In 1991 there was a documented petroleum discharge at the then Public Works fuel point at the
Plantation Key Government Center. A copy of the "Contamination Assessment Report" is attached in
the backup material. Low volume or low environmental impact discharges were placed on a list of site
rehabilitation in the order of priority that gave larger impact discharges priority for funding.
FDEP has now identified funding for these lower priority discharges. FDEP created a program in
which vendors of rehabilitation services may provide these services and FDEP will accept their
proposals if the vendor reduces their rate to cover the local match requirement(25%). Under the
program local governments can opt to find and recommend one of the FDEP approved Agency Term
Contractors (ATCs)who will reduce their rates up to 25% of the total cost and FDEP will accept that
commitment by the contract to cover the local match.
Staff contacted three (3) of the ATCs identified by FDEP for the southeast region. One(Imperial
Testing and Engineering, Inc.) agreed to provide the required scope of work at rates reduced by 25% to
cover the local match(their commitment and cost est. The other two (2) declined for various reasons.
Staff requests BOCC approval of the agreement with FDEP and approval for staff to execute submit the
"Cost Share Site Contractor Recommendation Sheet". Included in the backup material are the FDEP
agreement, the Cost share Site Contractor Recommendation Sheet, The ATC's commitment letter, the
ATC's cost proposal reflecting the 25%reduction, and the original Site Assessment Report from 1992.
469
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
N/A
INSURANCE REQUIRED:
No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
New Contract
Risk 8/1/25: insurance is required for this project. Per KW, vendor to submit insurance at a later date
with site access agreement to be executed before commencement of work. Approved with that
understanding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
DOCUMENTATION:
PCPP Agreement Form- 449102657.pdf
Cost-Share-Contractor-Recommend-Sheet-449102657.pdf
FDEP letter re PCPP Partcipation Agreement - Site ID 449102657.pdf
PCPP SOW and Cost Estimate 25% Rate Reduction-449102657.pdf
PCPP ATC letter of commitment rate reduction 449102657.pdf
1992-06 Contamination Assesment Report- 186 Key Heights Drive.pdf
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
470
AGREEMENT FOR PETROLEUM CLEANUP PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
This Agreement is entered into by and between the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection(hereinafter"Department"), whose address is 2600 Blair Stone Road,
Tallahassee, Florida,and Monroe County (hereinafter"Participant"),
whose address is 1100 Simonton Street; Key West, FL 33040
(collectively the"Parties") to perform certain site rehabilitation activities for
contamination determined eligible for the Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program
(hereinafter"PCPP") in accordance with Section 376.3071(13), Florida Statutes (F.S.).
The petroleum contamination subject of this Agreement is the discharge(s) date(s)
09/01/1991 at the Monroe Cnty Public Works Div-Garage (faculty name)
facility located at 88770 Overseas Hwy, Islamorada , Monroe County,Florida,
DEP Facility ID #449102657
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 376.3071(13),F.S., the Department is authorized
to provide state funding assistance for petroleum discharges determined eligible for
PCPP,based on the site's priority ranking established pursuant to Section 376.3071(5)(a),
F.S., and Chapter 62-771, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 376.3071(13), F.S., the Department has
determined the described contamination eligible and Participant provided the required
Limited Contamination Assessment Report(hereinafter"LCAR") or assessment data
[Contamination Assessment Report Addendum#2 (Report Title and Date)] exists and was
determined to be sufficient to support the proposed course of action and to estimate the
cost of the course of action; and
WHEREAS, the Participant shall provide one of the following: a 25% cost savings to the
Department, a 25%copayment by the Participant, or a combination of both a cost savings and
copayment that totals 25%.
WHEREAS, the Contractor who will conduct the work under this Agreement does so
pursuant to Chapter 62-772.401(2), F.A.C. The Contractor, to be eligible to perform work
under this Agreement, must be an Agency Term Contractor(ATC) awarded under the
Department's Petroleum Restoration Program and is currently in good standing under the
Agency Term Contract. The Contractor shall perform the work at the Facility pursuant to
the terms and conditions of its i)ATC, ii) this Agreement, and iii) any and all issued
Purchase Orders ("POs").
Facility ID#449/02657 1 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
471
PARTICIPANT AGREES TO PROCEED UNDER THE SELECTED OPTION
(please select and initial only ONE option and annronriate sub-options if applicable)
1 . ❑� Participant is providing a 25%cost savings to the Department:
�✓Attached as Exhibit A the agency term contractor's (ATC's) written
acceptance to a reduction in its Department ATC rates.
OR
Attached as Exhibit A is the Participant's executed PCPP
Conditional Closure Agreement(CCA,including Attachment B
Conditional Closure Agreement Contractor Recommendation)with an
endpoint of RMO Il.Also attach evidence of a properly recorded
interim declaration of restrictive covenant.
Participant Initials
If cost savings selected
2. Participant is paying a 25%copayment of the cost to cleanup.
Participant Initials
If copayment selected
3. participant is providing a combination of both a cost savings and copayment equal to
25%of the cost of cleanup(Attached as Exhibit A,recommended ATC's written
acceptance to a reduction in its Department ATC rates and the Participant copayment
percentage combination).
Participant Initials
If combination selected
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived here from, the
Department and the Participant do hereby agree as follows:
GENERAL.
1. All activities associated with the performance of this Agreement shall be in conformance
with the provisions of Chapter 376,F.S., and Chapters 62-780,62-771,and 62-772,F.A.C.
The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall additionally be subject to the applicable
provisions of Chapter 287, F.S.
2. The Participant understands that during the course of site rehabilitation,the
Department may,based on the statutes, rules and guidance of the Department, revise a
site rehabilitation strategy due to technical or cost considerations.
TERM OF AGREEMENT AND SPENDING LIMITS.
3. This Agreement is effective on the date of execution by the Parties until the earlier of-
(])the Department has determined that rehabilitation is complete pursuant to Chapter 62-
780, F.A.C. and issues a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) or Conditional Site
Rehabilitation Completion Order (CSRCO); or(2)the funding limitations set forth in Section
376.3071(13)(b), F.S., are exhausted and site rehabilitation has not been achieved.
Facility ID#449102657 2 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
472
4. The PCPP program funding cap per eligible PCPP discharge is$400,000,less any
funds previously spent to date, with an additional$100,000 in auxiliary funding
(available via amendment to this agreement if needed for remediation or monitoring in
order to achieve a No Further Action determination).
COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT.
5. In accordance with Sections 376.3071, F.S., and rules adopted pursuant to that
Section, the Department will prepare Work Assignments, and procure the work as
appropriate with the contractor designated and will thereby be responsible to the
contractor solely for the Department's percentage of its cost share, whether that cost is
100% after a cost savings has been demonstrated, 75% cost share, or combination of both.
6. The Department will review and approve site rehabilitation activities in accordance with
the terms of the procurement orders and Chapter 62-780,F.A.C., and shall make copies of
such documents available to the Participant in the electronic site file Oculus
(bttps:Hdepedms.dep.state.fl.us/Oculus/serv]et/login). The Participant is further advised and
understands that the Department may task a locally contracted county with review of site
rehabilitation documents or procurement documents under this Agreement.
7. In accordance with Section 287.0582,F.S., the State of Florida's performance and
obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the
Legislature. The Participant understands that this Agreement shall not result in the
encumbering of State funds upon execution of the Agreement.
COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PARTICIPANT.
8. The Participant represents that he or she or it is qualified to enter into this Agreement and
able to fully perform their duties under this Agreement. Participant acknowledges that the
responsibilities and obligations of this Agreement survive the transfer of the above referenced
facili /property.
9. When the Participant is paying a 25%copayment,or copayment combination,the
Participant further agrees that it shall be subject to the prompt payment provisions of Section
215.422,F.S.,upon receipt of an invoice for its share of costs from the Contractor,when such
invoice is accompanied by a written approval by the Department of the work completed.
10. When Participants are paying a copayment,the Participant shall maintain and provide upon
request,documentation that the invoice amount was paid. Failure to timely and adequately pay
the contractor and provide proof of that payment to the Department upon request shall be
considered a material breach of the PCPP Agreement pursuant to paragraph 14 and may result
in loss of eligibility. The Department will request confirmation of payment/contractor
certification either via letter or e-mail after the Department has approved the contractor's
work.
11.In accordance with Chapter 376,F.S.,it is unlawful for the Participant to receive any
remuneration,in cash or in kind,from a Contractor performing cleanup activities subject of this
Agreement.This would include an agreement whereby the Participant does not make timely
payments of the required copayment when the option of 25%copayment or copayment and cost
savings combination.
Facility ID#449102657 3 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
473
12. When a Participant is paying 25%copayment or copayment and cost savings combination,
the Participant shall maintain books,records,documents and other evidence pertaining to
compensation and payments directly pertinent to performance under this Agreement in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently
applied. The Department,the State of Florida or their authorized representatives shall have
access, without cost, except reasonable costs associated with photocopying such records,to
such records for audit purposes during the term of this Agreement and for five years following
ternunation of this Agreement.
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT AND REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
AGREEMENT.
13. This Agreement may be terminated for material breach of obligations by either Party.
Material breach means substantial failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement. A Party terminating the Agreement shall give written notice of the breach to the
other Party within 14 days of discovery of facts giving rise to the breach. Such notice shall be
of sufficient detail so that the Party allegedly in breach can formulate a remedy. If the breach
is remedied within 15 days of the notice,the Agreement shall remain in effect. If the breach is
not remedied within 15 days of the notice,the Agreement may be terminated within 15 days
of the close of the 15 day remedy period. Failure to timely pay the Participant's 25%co-
payment or 25%copayment and cost savings combination is considered a material breach of
this PCPP Agreement. In the event that the Department determines, in its sole discretion, that
the Participant is in breach of this Agreement, the Department reserves the right to exercise
all remedies at law and equity.
14. The Department reserves the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement for refusal by
the Participant to allow public access to all documents,papers, letters or other material
regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission,made or
received subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, F.S., in conjunction with this
Agreement(public records). The Department may terminate this agreement without cause
with notice to the Participant pursuant to paragraph 16.
15. The parties hereto agree to waive any right to jury trial under this Agreement.
NOTICES.
16. Any notice or written communication required or permitted hereunder between the
Parties shall be considered received when delivered via electronically by e-mail or
delivered in person or by mail by the appropriate Party Representative.Party Representatives
are as follows:
Facility ID#449102657 4 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
474
Department Representative: Participant Representative:
Kenneth Busen, P.G. Chritine Hurley Robert Shillinger
PCPP Coordinator
Name
Petroleum Restoration Program
Department of Environmental Protection County Administrator County Attorney
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 4580 Title
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 1100 Simonton Street 1111 12 Street(Ste 408)
Phone: (850) 245-8745
E-mail: Kenneth, usenLd lorida E ov street Address
Key West, FL 33040 Key West, FL 33040
City,State,Zip
305-292-4441 305-292-3470
Phone
hurley-Christine@monroecounty-fl.gov shlllinger-bob@monroecounty-fl.gov
Email
AMENDMENTS.
17. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the Parties.
ASSIGNMENT.
18. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party without prior written consent of the
non-assigning Party. The Department will not accept assignment of this Agreement to any
person or entity that,in the Department's determination,is unable to reliably comply with the
25%cost savings, co-payment,or combination of both obligation.
CHOICE OF LAW/FORUM.
19. The parties hereby agree that any and all actions or disputes arising out of this Agreement
shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida; and any such actions shall be brought in
Leon County, Florida.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITE REHABILITATION WHERE CLEANUP COSTS
EXCEED SPENDING LIMITATIONS.
20. In accordance with Section 376.3071(13)(f),F.S.,in the event that the funding
limitations specified in Section 376.3071(13),F.S.,are exhausted or exceeded prior to
completion of site rehabilitation, the Participant shall be obligated to continue site
rehabilitation activities in accordance with Section 376.3071(5),F.S.,and Chapter
62-780,F.A.C. If the Participant fails to timely continue the site rehabilitation activities the
Department and its contractors)are permitted to continue performing assessment and remedial
activities that the Department, at its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The Department
will designate its own contractor(s)to undertake site rehabilitation actions without the approval
of the Participant or any other party. The Department or its contractor(s)will perform any
assessment and remedial activities that the Department, at its sole discretion deems
appropriate to address the remaining petroleum contamination.As such, the Department,
Facility ID#449102657 5 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
475
at its sole discretion,may choose to undertake assessment or cleanup activities that are less
stringent than the requirements of Chapters 62-780 and 62-777,F.A.C., and which may not
result in the issuance of a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order. Pursuant to Section
376.3071(7)(b),F.S., the Department will seek recovery for all sums expended by the
Department for actions taken pursuant to this paragraph. Therefore, the Department
explicitly reserves its right to seek recovery from the Participant or any other responsible
party that amount which was expended by the Department in these matters.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
21. It is hereby understood and agreed that this Agreement states the entire agreement
and that the Parties are not bound by any stipulations,representations, agreements or
promises, oral or otherwise,not printed in this Agreement. This Agreement is binding
upon execution of the Agreement and is for the benefit of the Parties and to no other entities or
persons not signatories to this Agreement. This PCPP Agreement is the primary Agreement
between the Parties and any conflict between the PCPP Agreement and any of the
attachments the PCPP Agreement controls. No exhibit or attachment to the PCPP
Agreement can modify any statutes, rules, or procedures applicable to the Petroleum
Restoration Program.
FOR THE DEPARTMENT: FOR THE PARTICIPANT:
Natasha Lampkin Participant Signature
Program Administrator
Petroleum Restoration Program Print Name: James K. Scholl
Date: Title: Mayor
Date:
Attachment: Exhibit A
Facility ID#449102657 6 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
476
Below is a checklist of the appropriate documents required to be submitted as Exhibit A
with the PCPP Agreement.
1.a.When Participant is providing a 25% cost savings(as demonstrated in the
form of reduced rates by the proposed ATC) to the Department attach:
✓❑ ATC's written commitment to a reduction in its Department ATC rates
OR
Lb. When Participant is providing a 25% cost savings(RMO II) to the Department
attach:
❑ Participant's executed Conditional Closure Agreement with an endpoint of RMO
IT, with Attachment B Conditional Closure Agreement Contractor Recommendation
❑Evidence of a properly recorded interim declaration of restrictive covenant(only
the current real property owner(s)can execute this document)
OR
2. When Participant is paying a 25% copayment of the cost to cleanup none required
OR
3. When Participant is providing a combination of both a cost savings and
copayment equal to 25% of the cost of cleanup attach:
F-1ATC's written commitment to reduction in its Department ATC rates with
details of percentages for copayment and reduced rates
Please note, the above constitutes documentation required for Exhibit A, which will
become a part of the PCPP Agreement. Additional Backup Documentation (such as the
cost share contractor selection sheet, scope of work and cost estimate template, etc.) may
also be required as a separate file during the PCPP submission process. Refer to the PCPP
Instructions for Completion (ht!ps://floridadep.gov/waste/petroleum-
restoration/documents/instructions-completion-pcpp-agreement) for full details on
submitting.
Facility ID# 449102657 7 PCPP Agreement template 3/5/2024
477
,0SwAr Ron eSantie
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFGovernor
0 Is
Environmental Protection Jeanette Nufiez
Lt.Governor
j� Bob Martinez Center oa,b Valenstein
2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary
Tallahassee,FL 32399-2400
PETROLEUM RESTORATION PROGRAM
COST SHARE SITE CONTRACTOR RECOMMENDATION SHEET
The Responsible Party(RP)may use this sheet to recommend an Agency Term Contractor with a contract in the same region
as the site to perform work pursuant to a cost-share agreement in the Petroleum Restoration Program(PRP) that meets the
25% or higher cost share requirement pursuant to Chapter 62-772, Florida Administrative Code, Procurement Procedures
for the Petroleum Restoration Program. The entity selecting the Contractor must be a party to the executed cost share
agreement.
Site Name: Monroe Cnty Public Works Div-Garage FDEP Facility ID#: 449102657
Site Address: 88770 Overseas Hwy, Islamorada, FL Parcel ID#: 00416020000000
Responsible Party Name: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Responsible Party Rep. Name &Title: Kevin Wilson Assistant County Administrator
Responsible Party Rep. Phone# &E-mail: 305-453-8788 wilson-kevin@monroecounty-fl.gov
Select only one of the contractor options fisted below:
Recommend a PRP Agency Term Contractor with a valid contract in the region of the site:
Co. Name: Imperial Testing and Engineering, Inc. DEP Contractor ID#: 169
Rep. Name &Title: Mike Stillinger Vice President of Engineering
Rep. Phone#&E-mail: 863-647-2877 mike.stillinger@imperialtesting.com
Allow the DEP to select a competitively procured contractor for the next scope of work in accordance with s. 287.057,
Florida Statute.
I understand that the contractor selection option chosen above cannot be changed once it has been approved by the
Department,unless poor performance by the Contractor is affirmatively demonstrated.
Kevin Wilson, Assistant County Administrator
Responsible Party Rep.Name&Title Signature Date
Completed forms should be emailed to DW] 11'11� t �rntra�t�rr.1 ��err ay�a�nda�z�rn��(�x)d�l.� stag i1.us or sent to the
........ ......... ........ ....... ....... ....... ..... .. ......
letterhead address, Mail Station 4580, Attention: Robert Perlowski. Questions about cost share site contractor selection
may be referred to Rob Perlowski at 850-245-8917 or at Robert.Perlowski L(Wep.state.fl.us.
A list of Agency Term Contractors by region is available on the Petroleum Restoration Program Website at
�..-H!..on ade.p....l o / l ste/p hole urn restoration/content/�lualified contractor inlormcition
...... .... ....... .... .... ......... ......... ......
Cost Share Contractor Recommendation Sheet 71217 478
E'p mar FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
Ron DeSantis
Governor
Environmental Protection Jeanette Nufiez
Lt.Governor
Bob Martinez Center Shawn Hamilton
2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary
Tallahassee,FL 32399-2400
May 21, 2024
Monroe County
1 100 Simonton St
Ste 205
Key West, FL 33040
Subject: Notice of State Funding for Site Rehabilitation of Petroleum Contamination &
Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program (PCPP) Requirements
Monroe Cnty Public Works Div-Garage
8880 Overseas Hwy
Plantation Key, Monroe County, FL
FDEP Facility ID#449102657
Discharge Date: 09/01/1991 (PCPP)
Score: 9
Dear Property Owner:
This is to notify you that state funding is available for the cleanup of petroleum contamination at
the above listed location from the Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program (PCPP)pursuant to
Section 376.3071, Florida Statutes (F.S.). This discharge is eligible for PCPP for up to $400,000 in
state funding (with an additional $100,000 auxiliary funding for remediation and monitoring if
needed) per eligible PCPP discharge, less any funds spent to date. Because site rehabilitation
funding assistance is now available for the eligible discharge, the property owner, operator, or
person otherwise responsible for site rehabilitation must enter into a PCPP Agreement providing
the Department with either a 25% cost savings, 25% copayment, or combination of both
copayments and cost savings equal to 25% of the site rehabilitation costs.
The Department has limited contamination assessment information already on file indicating
remediation is necessary. Timely submittal of a fully executed PCPP Agreement and backup
documents with the Department is a statutory requirement for maintaining PCPP eligibility. Please
submit the required PCPP Agreement and backup documents within 60 days of receipt of
this notice.
1 10..021
479
Monroe County
FDEP Facility#449102657
May 21, 2024
Page 12
PCPP Instructions and the PCPP Agreement template are attached and can be downloaded at the
following link: https://floridadep.gov/waste/petroleum-restoration/content/petroleum-
cleanup-participation-program-pcpp
The PCPP Agreement and any backup documentation applicable can be submitted to email
DWM_PRP PCPP@FloridaDEP.gov.
If you do not have access to equipment that would enable you to view or complete the documents
digitally,please reply to this letter by contacting the PCPP Coordinator(contact information
below) and the items can be mailed to the address you provide.
PCPP Coordinator
Bob Martinez Center
2600 Blair Stone Road MS 4580
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Email: DWM_PRP_PCPP@FloridaDEP.gov
Phone: 850-245-8882
A list of Agency Term Contractors (ATC) can be found here:
s:// ro a s, e .state, s/www stem/contractors/Ate region/Ate region v
If you choose not to participate in the PCPP, inform the Department PCPP Coordinator within 30
days of receipt of this letter and immediately begin site rehabilitation in accordance with Chapter
62-780, Florida Administrative Code, at your own expense.
If you should have any questions, please contact the PCPP Coordinator at(850) 245-8882 or reply
to this letter contact at the letterhead address, Mail Station 4580.
Sincerely,
PCPP Coordinator and staff
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Petroleum Restoration Program
Email: DWM PRP_PCPP@FloridaDEP.gov
Attachments: PCPP Agreement
ec: Facility Oculus File
12 /0-.2021
480
PCPP Scope of Work (SOW) and Cost Estimate for 25%Cost Savings via Rate Reduction
Facility Name Monroe Cnty Public Works Div-Garage
Facility Address 88770 Overseas Hwy., Islamorada, FL
FDEP Facility# 449102657
PCPP Eligibility Discharge Date(s) 9/1/1991
Priority Score 9
Based on the results of the 1993 & 1994 CARA#1 and #2 reports submitted by U.S. Environmental
Group, Inc., this scope of work and estimated cost to complete cleanup is described below:
SOW/Phase Estimated Cost
Tk 1 HASP, File review, site recon, access agmt $ 3,400.00
Tk 2 Soil & GW assessment $ 47,000.00
Tk 3 Groundwater sampling event $ 9,200.00
Well Abandonment/Site Restoration $ 4,600.00
Subtotal $ 64,200.00
25% cost savings in the form of
reduced rates ($16,050.)
FDEP Estimated total cost to closure $ 48,150.00
ny cast allI t Ili L,q,fisclliau ge(s)flu mq,fin chops(and a WIN aoy flu mq,fing,'ff applfiicallallc)WWII Ilan t III L,wspons lla'iilfiity Oft IlmL,o sponsfllalle Isany/ownm
Estimated timetable and endpoint Eighteen (18) months
Lynn McGoff 6/20/2025
Scope and Estimate provided by Date
Imperial Testing and Engineering, Inc.
Company Name
FDEP PCPP 25% Rate Reduction Cost Estimate 10/06/23 481
Imperial
ia
-----------------
.......................................................................................................................................
3905 Kidron Road*Lakeland,FL 33811 *863-647-2877 *Fax 863-647-1770
EXHIBIT A
June 20, 2025
Sent via email to DWM_PRP_PCPPL&floridaDEP.gov
PCPP Coordinator
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
2600 Blair Stone Road
Mail Station 4580
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
Subject: Commitment of Rate Reduction for Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program
(PCPP)Agreement
Monroe Cnty Public Works Div-Garage
8880 Overseas Hwy.
Plantation Key, Monroe County, Florida
FDEP Facility ID ##449102657
Discharge Date(s): 09/01/1991 (PCPP)
Score: 9
PCPP Coordinator,
As part of the July 01, 2020 revisions to Section 376.3071(13)Florida Statutes,
owners/responsible parties (RP) may meet their 25% obligation via cost savings
demonstrated in the form of reduced rates by the proposed agency term contractor(ATC).
This letter serves to notify the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
Petroleum Restoration Program(PRP) that Imperial Testing and Engineering, Inc. (DEP
Contractor ID## 00169, as the recommended contractor for the above referenced facility,
agrees to a reduction of rates, in its ATC contract in the same region as the listed facility,
as required to achieve the 25% cost savings.
Sincerely,
Mike Stillinger, P.E.
Vice President Engineering
Imperial Testing and Engineering, Inc.
ec: RP
PCPP ATC Commitment of Rate Reduction Letter 11612021
482
A'&N
^MISSIMER 8& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Fnviranmenrcl and Grou1ulsvater Services
JULO 61992
D.E.R. Marathon, FL
LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT SOUTHERN UNITED STATES
483
1NISSIMEk lac ASSOCIATES,IIVC
f ntn..niur.Ual;ini Gnxinim'i[cr SruCcs
1
1
1
' CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR THE
COUNTY OF MONROE
FUELING FACILITY
AT
t 186 KEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
TAVERNIER KEY FLORIDA
FDER # 449102657
Submitted to:
' State of Florida
Department of Environmental
' Regulation
11400 Overseas Highway ��o{ a5�e
Suite 123
Marathon, Florida 33050 t oi-
By
Missimer & Associates, Inc.
14750 N.W. 77th Court, Suite 110 �
Miami Lakes, Florida 33016
ME1-619
JUNE, 1992
' Jose A. Alvarez, P.G.7
R istered Geologist No. 11 8
' State of Florida
484
' M&AMISSIMER & AS.S►OCIATFS,INC.
!nvii� nnnntal.uni Gruiinrltiratcr Scnirr,
' TABLE OF CQNTENT§
PAGE
' 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
' 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . 2
3.0 TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT AND
INITIAL REMEDIAL ACTION
ACTIVITIES 3
' 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
' 4.2 Aquifer Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
' 4.3 Regional Hydrogeology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.4. Site Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
t4.5 Site Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.0 CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.1 Preliminary Groundwater Contamination
Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
' 5.2 Monitoring Well Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.3 Groundwater Contamination Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
' 5.4 Soil Contamination Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6.0 SITE AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
ii
485
MIS51MEit&A, )CIATES,INC.
�r�l rnirunnuntal:uul C:uninJt�atcr Scrri�r,
' 7.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1
1
1
486
' llr([<<A MISSIMf li&ASSOCIATES,INC.
�r��itnnnmcutal xni L� uiindtti'.ucrScnic
' FIGURES
' FIGURE 2.1 LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2.2 SITE MAP
FIGURE 4.1 DADE AND MONROE COUNTIES
' FIGURE 4.2 WATER TABLE ELEVATION SURFACE MAP
FIGURE 5.1 LOCATION OF MONITORING WELLS
FIGURE 5.2 LOCATION OF SOIL CUTTINGS/SOIL BORINGS
' FIGURE 5.3 CONSTRUCTION PROFILE OF SHALLOW WELLS
FIGURE 5.4 CONSTRUCTION PROFILE OF DEEP WELL MW-11D
FIGURE 5.5 CONSTRUCTION PROFILE OF DEEP WELL MW-12D
' FIGURE 5.6 EXTENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
1
TABLES
' TABLE 1.0 WATER TABLE ELEVATION
TABLE 2.0 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
' TABLE 3.0 SOIL ANALYTICAL FIELD RESULTS
IV
487
' MISSIMM&ASSO CIATES,INC.
1 cn,rnnu.. ........,i C:ruunJwatcr Scnicc,
rAPPENDICES
' APPENDIX A TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT REPORT
APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM
' PRELIMINARY CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
' APPENDIX C GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FROM CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
r APPENDIX D SLUG TEST DATA AND CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX E WELL LOGS
1
r
1
1
r
1
1
r
r
r
r
r V 488
1
1
1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
' The following Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) has been
prepared by Missimer & Associates, Inc. (M&A) on behalf of the County of
1 Monroe to describe the contamination assessment conducted at the
maintenance facility located at Tavernier Key. The report describes the
1 conditions which made the assessment necessary, explains the procedures
implemented to assess the contamination caused by fuel discharges, and
' provides an assessment of the extent and degree of contamination present at the
1 subject facility.
1
1
1
1
1
489
1
1
' 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
' The Monroe County maintenance facility is located at 186 Key Heights
Drive, Tavernier Key, Florida, in the County of Monroe, Section 13, Township 63
' South, Range 37 east.
' The topography of the site is generally characterized by low relief. Ground
elevation is approximately five (5) feet above sea level. Figure 2.1 shows a
' location map.
' The area surrounding the site is characterized by residences and county
buildings. The property extends towards the southwest to Key Heights Drive. To
' the east and southeast, the property extends to U.S. highway 1. To the north,
' the area is predominantly residential.
The Monroe County maintenance facility has a vehicle repair and a shop
area. For the purpose of refueling county vehicles, the facility maintained both
' aboveground diesel and underground gasoline storage tanks. Refer to Figure
2.2 for a site map showing the location of the storage tanks and dispenser
tislands.
1
1
1
2
490
POOR ORIGINAL
10
ow-
L. :r. .r "r . •TtJ/
C,
rq ' �`,' •Q Snake \ /•• - \♦ x1.. 1
or
.s : •'• z 4 �. SITE * =
. \ `� „` if �•.r�; ;
= _ ''. .�`� *�*`+ I ••^Plantation Pt
' � �'•-� •.' ems. _ .�'"'� e
5» '. reasure
fibor
- • y
AWalker Bank •t_ ,
N4
MN
' CN
I 1 SCALE 1:24 000
r 1 7 0 1 MILE
53 MILS
5 MILS 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60DO 7000 FEET
' 1 .5 0 .•1•KILOMETER
UTM GRID AND 1988 MAGNETIC NORTH CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
' DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
�1VIlfRON �'NT�4L �4N1J GROUNI�A:4TR� SL�'RYIC�,S Miss&imer
' MnA DRN, BY: DWG NO. ME I-619 DATE: 6-1-92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE- FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 ASSOC18teS,lnc.
FIGURE 2. 1 LOCATION MAP 491
i ovK I ST Y.
WOOD
FRAME
BLDG.
I STORY
oW WOOD FRAME
• BUILDING
P
O
L�v- � P
yP0 CIO. msr INE 'lam
cA� 4tio
CONC. BLK.
BLDG. Q,
�v
`♦ A Q 0
' FRAME O�Q.
BLDG. Py
}�/ti
Y
' Oq
F
LEGEND
1 /
Jy
' SCALEs I INCH s 30 FEET
f'1VW)?0,NalfEJ 7XZ "D 6!)?0C1Ar0 I,4TFR 1fis i er
' DRN. BY: MLO DWG NO. M E I-619 DATE: S-26- 92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 Associates,Inc.
F(GURE 2.2 S(TE MAP 492
t
' 3.0 TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT AND INITIAL REMEDIAL ACTION
The County of Monroe retained the services of Environmental, Petroleum
and Remediation Services, Inc. (EPRS) to perform a Tank Closure Assessment at
' this facility.
' Prior to the tank closure assessment activities, a 4,000 gallon
aboveground diesel storage tank was replaced with a 1,000 gallon aboveground
' diesel tank on June 17, 1991. On July 29, 1991, a 10,000 gallon underground
unleaded gasoline storage tank was replaced with an 8,000 gallon underground
' storage tank.
1 During the assessment, Petroleum Management, Inc. (PMI) pumped a
' total of sixty-five (65) gallons of fuel from the gasoline tank and excavation area.
' EPRS collected soil samples from the gasoline tank excavation area and
from soil borings advanced in the vicinity of the diesel fuel tank.
' Based on the elevated readings detected in the soil samples using an
Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) and a Photo Ionization Detector (PID),
approximately 70 tons of pea-rock were removed from the gasoline storage tank
' area and stockpiled on visqueen for proper disposal.
' Organic vapor readings from samples obtained from four soil borings
advanced in the diesel tank area revealed elevated hydrocarbon vapors.
1
3
493
' However, soils were not removed, presumably because they were not
excessively contaminated.
Groundwater samples collected, as required by the Florida Department of
' Environmental Regulation (FDER) and stipulated in the Pollutant Storage Tank
Closure Assessment Requirements, revealed that both storage tank areas had
' concentrations of hydrocarbons above State guidelines. Appendix A provides
the Tank Closure Assessment Report prepared by EPRS.
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 494
' 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGY
' 4.1 Introduction
Dade and Monroe Counties are located at the southernmost portion of the
Florida peninsula (see Figure 4.1). Monroe County is south and west of Dade
' County and includes about 120 miles of small populated islands called the
Florida Keys. The major source of potable water for Dade and Monroe Counties
' is from the Biscayne Aquifer.
' 4.2 Aqulfer Descriptlon
' Meinzer defined an aquifer as a rock formation or stratum that yields water
in sufficient quantity to be of consequence as a source of supply'.
' The thickness of the Biscayne Aquifer is greatest along the coast in the
Miami area and northward in the vicinity of Fort Lauderdale, where in places it
' exceeds 200 feet. The aquifer decreases in thickness gradually southward from
Miami, and rapidly westward towards the Everglades. It ultimately thins out in
' eastern Collier and Monroe counties.
1
1 y
McWer.O.E. the occurrence of groundwater in the UnW Stales,with a dsarssion of prindp s, U.S.Goal.Suwy Water Supply.paper
496,p.321,1923.
1
495
U
J
� = 1
CL
.► V �a
CD
•� w
1 J wm
m
Y a�~
Z
oc •' N W
w '
d � o
41 � •R s � g �
Z Z
°
d �
° i .doe J
ID �, w
W ZE fig. a
..� z W
� O
,• 2
r -
a
i W O
0
r �
•� Vl
w a
A w w
Q
C]
o • -
m in
N N •
i
496
1
' The Biscayne aquifer is a single hydrologic unit of permeable materials
predominantly Plio-Pleistocene age. The boundaries of the aquifer, both
' horizontally and vertically, are set not by formation contacts or age restrictions,
but by differences in hydrologic properties. The lowermost sediments of the
' aquifer consist of limestone and shelly calcareous sandstones, while the
remaining and major portion of the aquifer is composed of rocks of Pleistocene
' age. In general, from bottom to top, the major formations include:
Caloosahatchee marl (erosional remnants), Fort Thompson Formation, Key Largo
' Limestone, Anastasia Formation, Miami Oolite, and Pamlico Sand.
' In the Florida Keys, coralline limestone of the Key Largo Limestone Formation, is
the predominant near-surface rock. It is generally believed that the Key Largo
' Limestone is contemporaneous in age to the Miami Limestone which forms the
' surface veneer thoughout most of Dade County.
' The Floridan Aquifer underlies the Biscayne aquifer. These two (2)
aquifers are separated in Dade and Monroe Counties by confining beds of
Miocene age. The Floridan Aquifer consists of approximately 1,500-ft. of artesian
water-bearing zones ranging in age from Miocene through middle Eocene age
' (Meyer, 1971, Puri and Winston, 1974).
' 4.3 Regional Hydrogeology
In the Florida Keys, the Biscayne Aquifer is approximately 100 ft. thick and
consists mainly of Key Largo Limestone. Geologically, the Florida Keys can be
tdivided into two groups - upper and lower Keys. While the upper Keys, from
1
fi
497
' Solider Key to Big Pine, consist predominantly of Key Largo Limestone; the lower
Keys, from Big Pine to Key West, are mostly of Miami Limestone.
Hydrogeologically, the sediments are extremely porous, and water flows
' through them easily. Fresh water entering the aquifer is rapidly discharged into
surrounding coastal waters. The coastal waters surrounding the Keys intrude
' into the Biscayne Aquifer making the water too salty to be used as a potable
water source.
The aquifer under the Keys can be thought of as a sponge. The volume
' of water changes as a result of weather and tide conditions. When there is
heavy rainfall and low tides the ground is saturated with fresh water. The fresh
water lens is close to the surface, and the net movement of water is from the
' aquifer towards the coast. At times of little rainfall and high tides the reverse
effect occurs.
' 4.4 Site Geology
' The uppermost lithologic unit at the site consists of Key Largo Limestone.
' The limestone is hard, light grey in color, containing streaks or thin layers of
crystallized calcite. The limestone contains considerable amounts of fine to
' medium grained quartz sand and calcareous sand.
' Generally the sands fill the solution holes and diminish the permeability of
the sediments. The limestone also includes fragments of marine shell fossils.
7 498
t
' 4.5 Site _Hydrology
tThe site is located approximately 45 miles south, and outside of the cone
of influence of the City of Florida City (Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority) water
' wellfield. Over 90% of available potable water is pumped to the keys through an
aqueduct from this wellfield.
1
Groundwater at the site is classified as G-III, having a total dissolved solids
' (TDS) concentration in excess of 10,000 mg/l.
' Well casing elevations of existing and newly installed monitoring wells were
surveyed by Mark Steven Johnson Land Surveyors.
1
t A survey level was used to locate the position of each well, and obtain
accurate well casing elevations relative to an arbitrary on-site benchmark.
Elevations were measured from the northern rim of the well casings and
referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD).
' The survey data was necessary to determine water table measurements in
' order to ascertain the direction of groundwater flow across the site.
tWater table measurements were taken on April 21, 1992. Table 1 lists the
survey data and water table elevations. Figure 4.2 shows a contour a map with
' the approximate water table elevations for this date.
8
499
1
' It should be noted, however, as previously cited in section 4.3,
groundwater flow direction fluctuates depending on local rainfall, seasonal
changes and tidal influences.
1
1
t
— 9
500
TABU 1.0
WATER TABLE ELEVATION
' APRIL 21, 1992
llo I Hkfitf�N N`11 p ItVAf�AI!I lH"t}
M W-1 8.12 7.90 0.22
' M W-2 8.27 8.05 0.22
MW-3 8.10 7.89 0.21
' MW-4 8.16 1 7.96 0.20
M W-5 8.79 8.56 0.23
' MW-6 7.83 7.95 -0.12
M W-7 7.83 7.97 -0.14
' M W-8 8.64 8.38 0.26
MW-9 8.47 8.25 0.22
MW-10 9.91 9.97 -0.06
' MW-11 D 8.49 8.33 N/M
MW-12D 8.33 8.18 N/M
N/M: 140T MEA,SUBF0
1
501
ti0
0 ti0 �h 0 h Oh �0 h
FORME
0
TANK 0.1?1? 1 STY.
MW- WOOD
FRAME
BLDG.
vv S 0
0
B I I
O.26 _ Q
MO 8 0.2 aQJ? MW 7 MW26
O
MW-IID
�MW 3 y 1>
` •a
0.22 Q �P
MW-9 FORMER �\r
O 10,000 GAL. .� QP
�0 CO GASOLINE
2 by y ti US 0T MW- Q0.23
CP 4Cy
MW-12D MW-10
CONC. BLK.
BLDG. 0.06
FRAME
BLDG. Pyo
1•
Fy •J
tirs
O,Q
F
LEGEND
Q PRE-EXISTING MONITORING WELL
O EXISTING MONITORING WELL
DEEP MONITORING WELL
0.20 WATER TABLE ELEVATION -FT. `
Jy
SCALE- I INCH: 30 FEET
ZyVYIRON�Z.4rrXZ "T CROUN.UA'�s.M? Missi er
DRN. BY: MLO DWG NO. M E 1-619 DATE: 5-26- 92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 ASSOCiBtesJne.
FIGURE 4.2 WATER TABLE ELEVATION SURFACE MAP 502
1
' 5.0 CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
' In order to implement the assessment a subsurface investigation was
conducted to fully define the extent of contamination created by the gasoline and
' diesel UST's. The subsurface investigation included a preliminary analysis of the
groundwater from existing monitoring wells, the installation and advancement of
' additional wells and borings, and collection of approxopriate samples from each.
Refer to Figure 5.1 for the location of all monitoring wells, and Figure 5.2 for the
' location of soil sampling.
' 5.1 Preliminary Groundwater Contamination Assessment
' On March 10, 1992, M&A collected groundwater samples from existing
' monitoring wells MW-1, MW-4 and MW-6. During the collection of groundwater
samples, a strong hydrocarbon odor from monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5 was
' noted. Based on this indication these two monitoring wells were not sampled at
this time, although data was available from previous analyses.
' Groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-4 and MW-6 were
' collected using a decontaminated teflon bailer, placed in preserved containers,
and kept in a chilled cooler during transport to VOC Analytical Laboratories for
' analyses.
The samples were analyzed in order to strategically locate the new
monitoring wells needed to delineate the extent of contamination.
10
503
FORMER
♦,OQO GAL.
ArL
rTAKE I STY.
MW-I WOOD
O FRAME
.:.� I STORY BLDG.
WOOD FRAME
aar,�Q BUILDING
a v
' MOB MW-2 aaJ� MW0-7 MWO 6
O OO O
MW-IID
MW-3
MOO 9 OOAMD GAL.
' 0 CD arm/NE
P C ti0 usr M O OMW-5
�O 4�0 y O
MW-12D MW-10
CONC. BLK.
O
BLDG. Q
' FRAME
BLDG. Q4O
F9jy �
�FJ_ pi
\yrS
09
iL
F
LEGEND
' Q PRE-EXISTING MONITORING WELL
O' EXISTING MONITORING WELL
QQ DEEP MONITORING WELL
_ y
J�
' SCALE; I INCH: 30FEET
�NUIRON��'NT�sIL .4NI> GROUNIJA�IT�R S�h'YIC�'�5' MissBmer
i
DRN. BY: MLO DWG NO. M E I-619- DATE: 5-26- 92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: ME -619 ASsOCiBtes,IIIC.
F)GURE 5. 1 LOCATION OF MONITORING WELLS 504
t •SB-II
T-CAR
pv#WsAc. T-CAR O SB-I
' �.s aEst<z SB-2
SB-7• TANK O I STY.
FRAME
T-CAR BLDG.
' SB-3 1 STORY
O o WOOD FRAME
•r- BUILDING
' SC-8 SB-4
• \
A pQ.
SC-11
S•9 /01100 SAL L a PP\v
' yP0 CIO vsr ME
cl SC-12 SB-5
CONC. BLK• 10
BLDG. SC- Q,
' FRAME
BLDG. Qc0
AAOA \ 9471 4"'
r
F
LEGEND
' • SOIL CUTTING (SC)
• SOIL BORING (SB) j
CO T-CAR SOIL BORING `
♦ r
Jy
' SCALE, I INCH: 30 FEET
,'NW)?0jV�f.P1VrXZ ".0 GI?DUNl0RXTPR SERMES Miser
DRN. BY: MLO DWG NO. M E I-619 DATE: 5-26- 92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 AssOCletes.IDC.
FIGURE 5.2 LOCATIONS OF SOIL CUTTINGS - SOIL BORINGS 505
' The samples were preliminarily analyzed for total Volatile Organic
Aromatics (EPA Method 5030/8021). The analytical results revealed minimal
' contamination from M ethyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE), Ethyl benzene and total
xylenes. Appendix B contains the analytical data from the preliminary
' groundwater contamination assessment.
' 5.2 Monitoring InstallationWell_
tBased on the analytical results from the preliminary contamination
assessment, three shallow monitoring wells, MW-8, MW-9 and MW-10, were
' installed on March 17, 1992, by Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
The monitoring wells were constructed of two inch diameter schedule 40
' PVC pipe with ten (10) feet of 0.010 inch machine slotted screen using hollow
stem augers, standard well drilling techniques and decontamination procedures.
Following the installation of the well casings, the annular space of the borehole
was backfilled with a coarse grade 8/20 silica sand filter pack to approximately
' two (2) feet above the screened interval. The sand pack was then sealed with a
layer of bentonite to form a watertight seal. The remaining borehole space was
tfilled with neat cement grout to the surface.
' On April 7, 1992, two deep wells were installed by Laidlaw Environmental
Services, Inc., following the above described procedure. The monitoring wells,
' MW-11 D and MW-12D, were constructed with five feet of screen and backfilled
with a sand pack to approximately one, and three feet, respectively, above the
1
r 506
screened interval. The monitoring wells were properly developed to allow for the
collection of a representative groundwater sample.
5.3 Groundwater Contamination Assessment
The rationale for the placement of the three additional shallow monitoring
' wells was to determine the horizontal extent of hydrocarbon contamination
created by the diesel and gasoline storage tanks. The two deep monitoring
' wells, one at each source, were intended to determine the vertical extent of
contamination. Figure 5.3 shows the shallow wells construction profile. Figures
5.4 and 5.5 show the deep wells construction profile.
' On March 20, 1992, M&A collected groundwater samples from all the
' existing and new shallow monitoring wells. On April 21, 1992, groundwater
samples were obtained from the deep monitoring wells.
' During both sampling events groundwater was collected after at least
' three well volumes had been purged from each well. Decontaminated teflon
bailers were used to collect the samples. The Samples were subsequently
' placed in preserved containers, and kept in a chilled cooler during transportation
to VOC Analytical Laboratories for analyses. For quality control purposes,
equipment blank samples were also collected.
Since the facility consisted of two sources of contamination, groundwater
samples were analyzed for the Kerosene and Gasoline Analytical groups in
accordance with Chapter 17-770 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC). The
12
507
FLUSH MOUNT PROTECTIVE STEEL ASSEMBLY
CONCRETE FINISH
WATER TIGHT LOCKING CAP
NEAT CEMENT GROUT
7 FT.
BENTONITE SEAL I FT.
2 FT.
TOP OF SCREEN
I FT.
WATER TABLE
0.010" SCH 40 PVC SCREEN
.s
2"0 SCH. 40 PVC CASING —
IO FT.
8/20 MESH SILICA SAND =
CAP BOTTOM T.D. = 17 FT.
8
.ENVD?4NjWZX.r,,4L ".0 6!R0IN�A':4TS)? SM?1,76FES Hisser
DRN. BY:MLO DWG N0. MEI-619 DATE: 5-26-92 A550Clat@, 5�8
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: M£1-619
FIGURE 5.3 SHALLOW WELL CONSTRUCTION PROFILE : MW-8., MW-9, at MW- !O
1
FLUSH MOUNT PROTECTIVE STEEL ASSEMBLY
CONCRETE FINISH
1 k,9 e:
WATER TIGHT LOCKING CAP A
NEAT CEMENT GROUT 27 FT.
' 2*'0 SCH. 40 PVC CASING
BENTONITE SEAL 2FT.
' TOP OF SCREEN
8/20 MESH SILICA SAND
0.015"SCH 40 PVC SCREEN
5 FT.
' CAP BOTTOM � T.D.- 32 FT.
1
P"IRONMENTWZ �4 P 0R0Z1A X4TSR SERUCE'S Missamer
nwADRN. BY: MLA DWG NO. MEI -619- DATE: 5-26-92
PROJECT NAME:COUNTY OF MON ROE- FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: ME I- 619 Associate: 509
F(GCIRE 5.4 DEEP WELL CONSTRUCTION PROFILE : MW - I I D
FLUSH MOUNT PROTECTIVE STEEL ASSEMBLY
I CONCRETE FINISH
1
WATER TIGHT LOCKING CAP
NEAT CEMENT GROUT 27 FT'
2"0 SCH, 40 PVC CASING
BENTONITE SEAL 2FT-
::' 3 Fx
TOP OF SCREEN
8/20 MESH SILICA SAND —
0.015"SCH 40 PVC SCREEN
5 FT.
ff
.�
i CAP BOTTOM T.D. z 32 FT.
EN Z)?0.V ZA' rrXZ "T GWOUJV,0#,4TER BURR-ES ltis Amer
DRN. BY: MLO DWG NO. MEI-619 DATE: 5-26-92
PROJECT NAME: COUNTY OF MONROE-FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 ASSOC3at6S, 510
FIGURE 5.5 DEEP WELL CONSTRUCTION PROFILE : MW-12D
1
groundwater samples from monitoring wells: MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-7, MW-8,
MW-9 and MW-11 D, were analyzed for the Kerosene Analytical Group which
' consists of: Volatile Organic Halocarbons, Volatile Organic Aromatics (EPA
Method 5030/8021), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (EPA Method
3510/8270), 1, 2-Dibromoethane (EPA Method 504), Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPA Method 418.1) and Lead (EPA Method 239.2).
1
The Gasoline Analytical Group was analyzed for samples collected from
' monitoring wells: MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, MW-10 and MW-12D. This group consists
of the same analytical methods previously mentioned with the exception of the
' Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TRPH). A summary of the groundwater analytical results is
provided in Table 2.0.
' The analytical results revealed that only the samples from monitoring wells
MW-2 and MW-5 (previously sampled) have concentrations of Benzene and Total
Volatile Organic Aromatics (VOA's) above permissible levels. Samples from
monitoring well MW-5 have higher concentrations than monitoring well MW-2.
Interpretation of the data reveals that only Methyl-tent-butyl-ether (MTBE) has
' reached monitoring wells MW-4, MW-9 and MW-10.
' MTBE is used as an oxygen enhancer in gasoline; its solubility generally
exceeds that of other organic contaminants. Due to its solubility, it would be
' expected to disperse faster and further than other contaminants identified. The
presence of MTBE in low concentrations at monitoring wells MW-4, MW-9 and
1
' 13 511
1
pJp 0 pJp { 4 t QJp pJQ pJ { J { C
QJQ { P
p
Z Z Z m m m i m = N O
1
a�/y Gf
f�iirr �!yy QJQ P J { { d, pJp pJp pJo { JJQ { 0 Qo
' aa�iraI�r�r�i
o
N 0
o o
Q
' F• J o J 4 a { .j J J a -4 C
4 I z z z z i o 0
N 1l1
~: p pp pp Q o QQ pp pQ po pQ
OO N CD 71 10
o
pJ p pJ pJ O -j J pJ pJ pJ pJ pJ �
00
1 WW y,, QQ
CJqy � J ll1 O JJQ pJo J M P ofp pJ � O
" 06 CIO N r m m ti v 7.1 O LA
' y
r
pJp O pJp OJp O pJp GJ GJQ OJO pJ pJp pJ {^ �
es cD 00 m N m Ca m m 06 m � O �
n pQ p nQ pQ pp pp
� � O
"•
N M 1 u'l �O � 00 P
1
512
' MW-10, as opposed to the high concentrations detected at monitoring wells MW-
2 and MW-5, suggests the plume has migrated in a south-southeasterly direction.
Concentrations of Total Naphthalenes were above regulatory guidelines in
' monitoring well MW-2; Lead exceeded the MCL at wells MW-3 and MW-7.
' The horizontal extent of groundwater contamination can be defined by two
small contaminant plumes; a plume created by diesel contamination and a plume
' created by gasoline contamination. Interpretation of the data suggests that both
plumes have remained in the vicinity of each storage tank dispenser pump with
' only MTBE migrating further.
' As indicated by the laboratory analysis of groundwater samples from the
' deep monitoring wells, MW-11 D and MW-12D, the extent of contamination has
not reached 27 feet below land surface. The deep wells delineate the vertical
' extent of contamination.
The groundwater contamination assessment conducted by M&A
determined that some hydrocarbon components are above allowable levels.
' However, both sources of contamination have been abated. Figure 5.6 provides
a map with the groundwater concentrations. Appendix C provides the
groundwater analytical results.
-- 14
513
SOL
f4WMfR L
L I STY.
r�xA-
MW-1 WOOD
0 FRAME
BLDG.
I STORY
�L WOOD FRAME SOL
SOL ,�4 BUILDING y
SOL BDL
Mw--8 �,� 0.110 MW-6 Ikep
' O MW-2 MQ7 SOL �';
'� ) a
010 MW-IID B n
0.03e o ` 0.007
t ao1 B BOL MW-3
BDL 0.0 1 SOL �/vy4'/
O07 M.-9 JO GaD G4L 6�' a to
CQ C �staavE -5 NS
C4 ~ BOL 1MW-4
�a NO o.00e Mw-12D SQL M.-10
' CONC. BLK. SOL
L
BLDG,
N BO
$flL SOL
ti
t FRAME
BLDG. pc0
1 OAf'�r 'Qb `h
r
F err
y
�yrS
ORS`
LEGEND
Q PRE-EXISTING MONITORING WELL
Q EXISTING MONITORING WELL
QQ DEEP MONITORING WELL
38 BENZENE CONCENTRATION 0&9/11
' 19 TOTAL VO4 CONCEN. (µqA)
910 TOTAL NAPHTHALENES CONCEN. Iyq/0
0.038 LEAD CONCENTRATION (mg/1)
SOL ■ BELOW DETECTION LimiT — ~
' WA • NOT ANALYZED
Jy
SCALE, I INCH: 30 FEET
LIVP®r?ON,bTX7XL "D Gf 0ffjV.0R.'r4TLSR SLSRYICPS Misser
WA
DRN, BY: MLO DWG NO. ME 1-619 DATE: 5-26- 92
' 11
PROJECT NAME.- COUNTY OF MONROE -FUELING FACILITY NUMBER: MEI-619 A550C1aB, 514
FIGURE 5,6 EXTENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
1
' 5.4 R,QII_Contamination Assessment
' In order to define the extent of soil contamination soil samples were
collected from the boreholes of monitoring wells MW-8, MW-9, MW-10, MW-11 D
' and MW-12D.
' Collection of the samples was conducted from the surface to a depth of
eight feet, at two foot intervals at each of the monitoring well locations. Soil
' cutting location points were labeled S.C-8, S.C-9, S.C-10, S.C-11 and S.C-12.
' Additionally, three (3) soil borings, S.13-5, S.B-7 and S.B-11, were
advanced on April 7, 1992, to complete the delineation of soil contamination.
Samples were collected from the flight auger. Initially, a split-spoon was driven,
' but due to the inability to penetrate the subsurface the remainder of the hole was
rotary drilled. On Figure 5.2 the sample locations are labeled as stated above.
' All soil samples collected by M&A were analyzed in the field using an OVA.
' This was accomplished by sampling the headspace of a half-filled sixteen (16)
ounce soil jar and following the guidelines established by the FDER for
' assessment of petroleum contaminated soils. OVA analysis from soil borings
and soil cuttings obtained during monitoring well installation are presented in
Table 3.
' All samples analyzed by M&A indicated minimal or absent hydrocarbon
vapors. Interpretation of the data indicates that the contamination of
' hydrocarbons in the soils has been confined to the immediate area surrounding
the diesel and gasoline tank locations.
15
515
' TABLE 3.0
Sot SAMPIFS tO7W %q�AC1ENpS(PPhA•b}
• TGtR S,B 1 0-2 52
0-4 153
4-6 162
6-8 126
' TZAR S.B-2 0-2 175
2.4 156
4-8 205
' 8.8 174
• T-CAR S.B-3 0-2 127
' 2-1 158
4-6 3b3
5-6 362
T-CAR 5.8-4 0-2 126
2-4 148
4-8 126
' s-e 406
S.C-8 0-2 ILS
2.4 1.0
4-8 1.0
4.8 0
0-2 0
' 2-4 0
4-8 0
s-8 0
t s c-10 0-2 0
2-4 0
4-6 0
' 8-8 0
s,c-11 0-2 o
2-4 0
' 4-6 a
6-8 0
s-c.-12 0.2 0
' 2-4 0
4-6 6
6-8 6
;.B-5 0-2 0
2-4 0
4-6 0
S.B-7 0-2 0
2-4 0
4-6 2
' S.b-11 0-2 0
2-4 0
4-6 6
' A�vdirgs of T Car S It 1 itru I Cur S.B 1 were mrewed 6y a MO. Aucwdrq to EFM.correla6om Presented by Pholorac.Inc.at the Fq[R StnraW Tank
Am *A Mralinq an Muy 13,I491 bcicrmmen that a H0 reacing A 55 FPM hs eg13Y9Wd to the 50 PPM regt4ateq Ym4 on itw OVA when ar""g far Basel
cmtamw,Wn
516
1
' 6.0 SITE AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS
' On May 11, 1992, a slug test was performed on monitoring wells MW-8,
MW-9 and MW-10 to determine site-specific aquifer characteristics, specifically,
hydraulic conductivity.
By rapidly lowering a solid cylindrical bar, called a slug, down the well, it is
possible to induce the water column to rise initially before equilibrating once
' again to static conditions. This method is equivalent to adding a volume of water
to the well equal to the volume of the slug.
The slug test is performed by quickly withdrawing the slug from the well
and measuring the time required for the water to return to static level.
1 The rate of well recharge enables the calculations of the hydraulic
' conductivity (K). Using the Bouwer & Rice Method, the hydraulic conductivity
from MW-10 was calculated to be 151.89 ft/day. Due to on-site technical
' difficulties only the data from MW-10 was usable. The data from the other two
wells did not produce technically reliable plots from which an accurate estimate
of the hydraulic conductivity could be established without having to rely on
statistically modified results. Please bear in mind, that if this site is going to
proceed into remediation, the State of Florida requires that a more reliable
estimate of aquifer properties, such as from an aquifer performance test (APT),
be conducted. The raw data and calculations are included in Appendix D.
tAverage transmissivity for the upper 17 feet of the aquifer is 2,582 ft2/day
using the equation T = Kb, where b = aquifer thickness. It would be
' inappropriate to consider the full thickness of the aquifer, unless the full thickness
of the aquifer was hydrogeologicaliy similar (homogenous and isotropic) to the
' interval tested during the slug test, which it is not.
16 517
1
' Based on the lithological data gathered during the installation of the
monitoring wells, the approximate porosity is estimated to be 0.25. This
' conforms to values in the published literature as cited by Todd.
' Using the water elevation data from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8, the
hydraulic gradient across the site is calculated to be approximately 4x10-3
' foot/foot. Groundwater velocity is estimated by using the following equation:
Vh = KI/ne
where: Vh = horizontal velocity
K = hydraulic conductivity
I = hydraulic gradient
' na = effective porosity (estimated)
1
1
4 Todd,D.K GrouWwater Hydrology:19%.P.24.
-- 17
518
1
1
' 7.0 CONCLUSIONS
' A Tank Closure Assessment performed by EPRS at the Monroe County
maintenance facility in Tavernier Key, revealed that both diesel and gasoline
storage tank areas had concentrations of hydrocarbons above State guidelines.
' An assessment was initiated by M&A on behalf of the County of Monroe
to determine the extent and degree of hydrocarbon contamination. All work was
performed in accordance with the rules and regulations stated in Chapter 17-770
' of the Florida Administrative Code.
' In order to delineate the extent of groundwater contamination five
monitoring wells were installed. Groundwater samples were collected and
' analyzed from all five of the new wells, in addition to the seven preexisting wells.
Soil samples were collected from soil cuttings and from the advancement of three
' soil borings. Samples were analyzed in the field via an Organic Vapor Analyzer
(OVA).
Based on the analytical results, the degree and extent of diesel and
' gasoline contamination was determined. The horizontal extent of groundwater
contamination at the diesel storage tank area is confined between monitoring
' wells MW-1, MW-8 and MW-9. The horizontal extent of groundwater
contamination from the gasoline storage tank area is confined between
' monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-10. The vertical extent of
contamination does not exceed 27 feet below land surface at both storage tank
areas.
19
519
1
The extent of soil contamination was also delineated. At the diesel storage
tank area, contaminated soils are evident according to EPRS's Tank Closure
' Assessment Report. The extent has been delineated by soil borings S.13-7, S.13-
11 and soil cuttings S.C-8 and S.C-11.
1
At the gasoline storage tank area soil boring S.13-5 and soil cutting S.C-12
' failed to show any soil contamination. It is possible that since soils were
excavated from this area during the Tank Closure Assessment, no remediation is
necessary.
1
1
1
1
1
20 520
. POORORiG1NAL U
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS JUL 2 Z 199Z
D.E.R. Marathon, FL
Given the concentrations of diesel and gasoline components detected at
monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5, this Contamination Assessment Report (CAR),
in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 17-770.630 FAC, is
submitted with a recommendation for a "Remedial Action Plan" (RAP) option.
M&A recommends that the excessively contaminated soil in the vicinity of
the former diesel tank excavation be. removed or remediated. Based on the
locations of SB-1 through S13-4, and their spatial separation as shown in Figure
5.2, it appears the area of excessive soil contamination may cover some 60 feet
by 20 feet. In light of tho fact that excessive soil contamination was found to a
depth of 8 feet (Table 1, Appendix A), this means 60 feet x 20 feet x 8 feet
9600 cubic feet (356 cubic yards) or approximately 480 tons of excessively
contaminated soils should be remediated.
It is very likely, however, that at 8 feet below grade the soil is already
below the water table. Soil removal, if that's the remediation option, should be
limited solely to the vadose zone, thus reducing the volume of excessively
contaminated soil by more than half or approximately 240 tons.
Provisionally, the Remedial Action Plan design for this site will include a
temporary pump and treat system. Specific details of the RAP will be formulated
in compliance with schedules established in Chapter 17-770.
21
521
' 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
' Given the concentrations of diesel and gasoline components detected at
monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5, this Contamination Assessment Report (CAR),
' in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 17-770.630 FAC, is
submitted with a recommendation for a "Remedial Action Plan" (RAP) option.
1
' M&A recommends that additional soil testing be conducted in the
immediate vicinity of monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5. In the event the results
' indicate the presence of excessively contaminated soils, the soil should be
removed or remediated in-situ in order to achieve compliance.
' Provisionally, the Remedial Action Plan design for this site will include a
' temporary pump and treat system. Specific details of the RAP will be formulated
in compliance with schedules established in Chapter 17-770.
1
1
1
1
1
1
21 522
1
1
1
1
' APPENDIX A
TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT REPORT
1
1
1
1
1
523
CC
i N71RONMENTAL
' R.'TRJLEUM
A, x.
R EMEDIA I'ION Q
SERVICES Inc. •.W.M�.
ENVIRONMENTAL.ENGrNEERINGICONSULTINGICONSTRUC ON
1 TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
' MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANCE FACILITY
186 KEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
' TAVERNIER KEY, FLORIDA
PROJECT # 922321
SUBMITTED TO:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
1900 S. CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE A
' WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406
' SUBMITTED FOR:
MR. JIM DORE
MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 1029
KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040
1
SUBMITTED BY:
ENVIRONMENTAL, PETROLEUM
AND REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.
' 6555 N.W. 9TH AVENUE, SUITE 201
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309
(305) 772--6091
1
SEPTEMBER, 1991
PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:
' CRAIG C. CLEVENCER KELLY S. WINSLOW
HYDROGEOLOGIST PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
Broward Palm Beach Dade Other/ 524
i5) 486-7418 (407) 820.8977 (305)530-0085 1•S00 63�-......
' 1.0 INTRODUCTION
' Environmental, Petroleum And Remediation Services, Inc. (EPRS)
performed a Tank Closure Assessment at the Monroe County
maintenance facility located at 186 Rey Heights Drive, Tavernier,
' Florida. A completed copy of the Florida Department Of
Environmental Regulation (FDER) Closure Assessment Form is provided
as Appendix A. Closure assessment activities were conducted within
the guidelines established in the FDER Pollutsnt Storage Tank ' '
' Closure Assessment Requirements, dated May, 1990.
On July 29, 1991 Don and Sons Equipment Rentals, Inc. removed one
' ( 1) 10,000 gallon underground unleaded gasoline storage tank. The
tank was replaced with one ( 1) 8,000 gallon underground unleaded
gasoline storage tank. Prior to the tank closure activities a
4,000 gallon aboveground diesel fuel storage tank was replaced with
a 1,000 gallon aboveground diesel tank in May, 1991. Although Don
and Sons did not replace the aboveground tank, they did haul away
' both the empty 4,000 gallon and 10,000 gallon tanks. PMI was on-
site during the closure and pumped a total of 65 gallons of liquid
from the underground gasoline tank and the excavation. The
disposal manifest for the pump truck activities is provided in
' Appendix B. During the excavation an EPRS representative performed
a visual inspection and collected soil and groundwater samples.
A detailed site map is provided as Appendix C.
2 .0 SOIL ASSESS14ENT
As part of the tank closure assessment EPRS collected soil samples
from the gasoline tank excavation and from soil borings in the
vicinity of the diesel fuel tank. Glass sampling jars were half-
filled with the soil, covered with aluminum foil and allowed to
' equilibrate. The headspace of each sample was analyzed in the
field using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) , the Microtip HL-200
Photoionization Detector (PID) . Calibration studies (see Appendix
1 D) , approved by the FDER, of the Microtip PID versus flame
ionization detectors (FID) document that a PID value of 250 ppm is
equivalent to a FID reading of 500 ppm, which is the prescribed
' limit defining excess gasoline soil contamination as regulated by .
Rule 17-770.200 (2 ) FAC. Recent studies, presented by PhotoVac,
Inc. at the FDER Storage Tank Annual Meeting on May 23, 1991, found
that a PID reading of 55 ppm is equivalent to the 50 ppm regulated
limit on a FID when analyzing for diesel contamination. EPRS used
the OVA/PID reading of 55 ppm as the boundary for excessive soil
contamination because diesel was stored on-site.
' Prior to analysis, the PID was zeroed with the atmosphere and
calibrated using 100 ppm isobutylene gas. A summary of OVA
analysis results are provided in Table 1 . A hard copy of the OVA
readings are provided in Appendix D.
OVA/PID readings on soil samples collected from the gasoline tank
' excavation were all below the 250 ppm (500 ppm FID) regulated
limit, but soil samples collected just below the water table
525
1 ,
icontained elevated OVA levels of 238 ppm. In order to eliminate
a possible source of further groundwater contamination, the soils
1 containing elevated OVA levels were excavated. Approximately 70
tons of pea--rock were stockpiled on visqueen awaiting disposal..
On July 30, 1991 EPRS supervised the advancement of four (4 ) soil
borings in the vicinity of the aboveground diesel fuel tank. The
soil borings were advanced to a depth of eight (8) feet below
grade. Soil samples were collected every two (2) feet using a
' split spoon coring device. The split spoons were decontaminated
by steam cleaning prior to the advancement of each boring. All
soil samples collected contained elevated hydrocarbon vapors, as
detected with the OVA/PID. Soil samples collected from SS V a 3
and 4 contained the highest OVA/PID readings.
' 3.0 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Upon removal of the underground gasoline storage tank a very light
' hydrocarbon sheen was observed on the groundwater table. No
corrosion holes were observed on the storage tanks. The
groundwater table was at a depth of approximately eight (8) feet
' below grade. Groundwater samples were collected directly from the
excavation, transported to Spectrum Laboratories, and analyzed for
purgeable aromatics using EPA Method 602. Analytical results of
the groundwater samples reported that elevated levels of benzene,
' total volatile organic aromatics (VOA) , and methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE) were detected. The concentrations exceeded State guidelines
for groundwater quality. Analytical results are summarized in
Table 2. Laboratory reports are included in Appendix E.
On July 30, 1991 one ( 1) monitoring well was installed immediately
' south-southeast of the aboveground diesel fuel tank. Groundwater
samples were collected from the monitoring well an August 26, 1991 ,
transported to Spectrum Laboratories, and analyzed for purgeable
aromatics using EPA Method 602, and polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons using EPA Method 610. Laboratory analyses detected
elevated levels of benzene, total VOA, MTBE, total naphthalenes,
and associated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, in excess of
State guidelines. Analytical results are summarized in Table 2 .
Laboratory reports are provided in Appendix E.
526
' TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF O A APSIS
Sgunple Location Sam a Event: AID Reading{ppm?
' GASOLINE INK,_EXCAVATION
' Above Tank 92 15. 8
Above Tank 93 21.6
Above Tank 94 23. 3
' West Wall 96 16.5
West Wall 97 18.7
North Wall 98 0.0
' North Wall 99 0.5
East Wall 102 50.5
South Wall 103 6.4
Below Tank 104 136.0
' Below Tank 105 238.0
Below Tank 107 39.8
Below Tank 108 48. 1
' DIESEL FUEL TANK CLOSURE
0 - 2 111 52.0
2 4 112 153 .0
4 - 6 113 162 .0
' 6 - 8 114 128 .0
SB 2
0 - 2 115 175. 0
2 - 4 116 156.0
4 -- 6 117 205.0
' 6 - 8 118 174 .0
SB#3
0 - 2 119 127 .0
' 2 - 4 120 158.0
4 - 6 121 353.0
6 - 8 122 382. 0
' B j 4
0 - 2 123 126.0
2 - 4 124 148.0
4 - 6 125 126 .0
6 •- 8 126 406 .0
' * PID reading of 250ppm s VID reading of 500ppm for gasoline.
PID reading of 55ppm EID reading of 50ppm for diesel fuel.
Water table encountered at 8.0 feet below grade.
r 527
1 TABLE 2
SVl4 Y OF GROUNDWATER RESULTS
PAR MTER " MCL GAS TANK
BENZENE 1 14 .9 89.0
TOLUENE 21.0 223.0
' ETHYL BENZENE BDL 126.0
TOTAL XYLEIIES 240.0 40e.0
TOTAL VOA 5o 265.9 846.0
' MTBE 5o 285 .0 310.0
' NAPHTHALENE N/A 288.0
1-METHYLNAPHTSALENE N/A 293.0
2-METH11NAPHTELENE N/A 24842
TOTAL VA.PHTHALENES 100 N/A 829.0
ANTHRACENE 10 N/A 111.0
FLOURANTHENE 10 N/A 76.0
' FLOURENE 10 N/A 33.4
PYRENE 10 N/A 82 .0
' * All results are reported in ug/l
KCL = Maximum Contaminant Level allowed in groundwater,
' per Chapter 17-770.730, F.A.C. .
BDL = Below Detectable Limits
' N/A = Not analyzed for particular parameter.
1
1
1
528
' 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS/FOLLOW-UP
' 1. Based on the observations during the tank closure assessment,
specifically the presence of excessively contaminated
groundwater, EPRS has submitted a Discharge Reporting Form
(see Appendix F) to the FDER.
' 2. Per Chapter 17-770, F.A.C. , a Contamination Assessment (CA) . .
should be initiated within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
' report. The objectives of the CA is to evaluate the extent
of soil and groundwater contamination and to evaluate third
party (off-site) liabilities.
' 3. Per Chapter 17-770, F.A.C. , a Contamination Assessment Report
(CAR) must be submitted for review within six (6) months of
' initiation of the CA.
1
1
1
1
529
IMAGE QUALITY
AS YOU REVIEW THE NEXT GROUP OF IMAGES, PLEASE NOTE
THAT THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS WERE.OF POOR QUALITY.
530
G.�`...� all 0N,.. n•�17�
# Florida Department of Environmental Regulation ,--
+ ' Twin ibwen ORk v Bldg. • 26W BLUr scone Road 0 'fttlaharssee. Sor{da 323994400 les.� O�Owr+err+4�YliO
r Or11 wv.r�,r,ur
+arL rM q
Closure Assessment Form
tCvff rs of storage tank systems that are replacing,removing or closing in place storage tanks shalt use this form to demonstrate that a storage
system closure assessment was performed in accordance with Rule 17.761 or 17.762,Florida Administrative Code,Eligible Early Detection Incen-
tive(EDQ and Reimbursemerd Program sites do not have to perform a Gosure assessment.
Please Print or Type
Complete All Applicable Blanks
' 1. Date:
' 2. 'DER Facility ID Number:.. _._,., 3. County: morr a e
4. Faeifity Name: rnnnrnP nor k.4 Me,:n--cne.yk e.r
'U
S Facility Owner:
Facility Address:_ IV. . 446,'.,1,4t
7L
Mailing Address: llln-r-boy _!'hrm:L. P_yt91.'G._fi�a ks 01-p-I :ar% Ch.rlrwrr4r+ &. P6IRbje 10Z
4::Telephone Number:r, __} R 9. Facility Operator: _ MIS . �-Mra- flare _
10. Are the Storage Tank(s): (Circle one or both) A. AboMeground or C:EL Underground
't. Type of Product(s) Stored: 01 r.x r f B s a I,tA r.
12. Were the Tank(s). (Clrcle one) A. Replac B. Removed C. Closed in,Place D.))Upgraded (aboveground tanks only)
11- Number of Tanks Closed: 14. Age of Tanks:l�/!A
' Facility Assessment Information
Not
No Applicable
19 1. Is the facility participating in the Florida Petroleum Liability Insurance and Restoration Program (FPLIAP)?
2. Was a Discharge deporting Form submitted to the Department?
If yes, When: Where:
❑ ❑ 3- Is the depth to ground water less than 20 feerl
4. Are monitoring wells r nt around the storra�e system?
11 yes, specify type: Water monitoring [J Vapor monitoring
❑ S. Is there free product present in the monitoring wells or within the excavation?
❑ 6. Were the petroleum hydrocarbon vapor levels in the soils greater than SW parts per million for gasoline?
Specify sample type: ❑Vapor Monitoring wells ❑Soil sample(s)
❑ ❑ 7. Were the petroleum hydrocarbon vapor levels in the soils greater than 50 parts per million for diesel/kerosene?
Specify sample type: ❑Vapor Monitoring w,rellr�S l sample(s)
❑ ❑ l3 Were the analytical laboratory results of the ground water sample(s)greater than the allowable stale target lees?
(See target levels on reverse side of this form and supply laboratory data sheets)
r J IS 9. If a used oil storage system, did a visual inspection detect any discolored soil indicating a release?
�. t0. Are any potable wells located within 1/4 of a mile radius of the facility?
11. Is there a surface water body within V4 mile radius of the site? If yes, indicate distance:
531
PaW , W1
wr....r C r-,r C�a Dw.r 5.......+r Orrcr S..�Oa.r. saiwr u.,.•
' per"Tam ebww AMONSWAM FWM
oce.saran+Me
of
1
' 12. A derailed drawing of 0 eCh d the WiNty that indudes the stc 11W"Ism location,mor*ring wells,hAdirgs.storm dmre%sample locations,
and disperser locations must eoccxrpary this term.
13 if a bcity has a poluftt storage W*system that ties bah t7w,(*ne and loer4s n&desel atored on site,bath EPA Method 602 and EPA Method
610 waA be performed on the ora,nd weler samples obtained.
' 14, A ncurd d soils rerrYJaed and receipt d proper dopossl.
15 ti yes is wwAemd b&V one d queetiors S-R a Discharge Reporting Form 17-76190M)indicating a suspected release*W be submitted
b the Department wittiirt one wor4ring day.
116 A copy d Ne brm and any aaaOvnem must be sutmvftd b the 06PNOw is di9W dks in your area and 10 t w 10cW admit Oered pro-
gram drrc a trader comed with the Department widyn 60 days d oompie m d tank removal or Ming a tank with an inert malarial.
' Signature d Owner Dace
('- q/ �9
Signature of Perbarming ASsessivni Date
fte d ng ,rssessrrient
1
1
State Ground Water Target Levels That Affect A
' Pollutant Storage Tank System Closure Assessment
' Sate ground water target le,.els are as blows:
'For gasoline(EPA Method 602): 2. For kerosererdesel (EPA Method 610):
a. Benzene 1 u04 a Polyrwxlear Ammatio Hydrocarbons (PAKS)
bL Total %04 so U94 post achieoeUe demctian kT it, 10 ugA rtsa n urn)
- 6eruene
•Toluene
' - Total xyienes
Methyl TestZW W UV
Ether (MTM
532
1 '
1 '
PETROLEUM MANAGEMENT, INC.
2191 S W 118 Twram
DAME. R 333'2'S
&vNBrd � 1 Jkdf r# 1� 7
NAME ,
AQQR
GTY. IPTIGN PRIG! AMGU�41
TOTAL
y
�V
N .
O 0 /� L q 1 V ��L CL+�MA/AMA RI;VIS Y T IS M
y (� .IL MW H ACCQWtPANIEO�7M�mil,
4f u.SJI a JFWt!!�CYaw
1
1
1 '
533
V �
4
F Q -JW
U
U
o =
W
In
if
cd
i
t � w
1 W� fin^ V, y lal Q
to to
2 .
I �
LLJ
1 ;
i
1 � J
z
\•\ C? O p
C
' \ KEY HEIGHTSDRIVE x w
W z
' W
534
Photovac MicroTlP Statistical Monitoring Report
Averaging rnterval: 1 Readings
15 Seconds
Date Time Min Avg Max Event Status Notes
1 29, 91 10:36 0.9 2.3 3.4 091 Ready
0 .0 33. 3 106 Cal
0.5 64.6 106 Cal
0. 0 0.0 0.5 Ready
10:37 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
' 0.0 0. 0 0.0, Ready
0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
10:38 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
' 0.0 0.0 0. 0 Ready
0.0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
10 :39 0.0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 2 .9 7.1 092 Ready _ ,L a� oyC +nK
' 0.4 10.2 15.8 Ready ^"
0.0 0.0 0.4 Ready
10:40 0. 0 0.5 6.7 093 Ready __.Soc t�be.rre fkv K
0. 9 14. 1 21.6 Ready
' 10:41 0.0 0 .2 0.9 094 Ready a a vt v.
0.5 16 .1 23.3 Ready
0. 0 1.2 9.2 Ready
0. 0 0.0 0.2 Ready _
10:42 0.0 0. 1 0.2 Ready
11:44 0. 0 0.0 0.3 095 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
11 : 45 0. 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
' 0. 0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0;0 0.0 Ready
11 :46 0.0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0 .0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
11 :47 0 .0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0.0 1. 5 16.5 096 Ready WC,67 L.r,4l
0.0 7.0 18.7 097 Ready in/c6T A/-,41[
' 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0.0 0.0 Ready
11 :48 0.0 0.0 0.0 098 Ready Y .114cifi u/A I
0.0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
11:49 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 099 Ready
0.0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0. 1 0.5 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
11 :50 0.0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0.0 0.0 Ready
11 :51 0.0 62.8 232 100 Alarm
0.0 15 .0 217 Alarm
12 : 15 0 .0 0. 0 0 .0 101 Ready 535
1 ,
0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
' 0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
12 : 16 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
' 0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 Ready
12 : 17 0 .0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
' 0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 102 Ready
0.0 28 .5 50.5 Ready
0.0 0 . 1 3.6 Ready
' 12 : 18 0.0 2 . 9 6.4 103 Ready
0. 0 0. 3 4.9 Ready
0.0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
12 : 19 0 .0 70 .2 136 104 Ready Awa t,I
' 0. 0 9 . 7 90. 1 Ready `
0.0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
' 12 :20 0 .0 75. 0 238 105 Alarm 36L lnr[d"i
4 . 6 78 . 0 220 Alarm
0.0 0 . 9 4. 6 Ready
' 14 :45 0 .0 0 .0 0 . 0 106 Ready
0. 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
' 14:46 0. 0 0 .0 0. 0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
0.0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
' 14:47 0 . 0 6 .9 39 .8 107 Ready
0. 0 15 .8 39. 1 Ready
z,5,\d
0 . 0 0. 0 0. 0 Ready
' 0. 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
14 : 48 0 . 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
' 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 Ready
14: 49 0 . 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0 . 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0 . 0 0 .0 Ready
0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
14 :50 0. 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
' 0. 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Ready
0 .0 0 . 0 0. 0 Ready
' 14 :51 0 . 0 0 .0 0.0 Ready
0. 0 16 . 6 48. 1 108 Ready
1
1
536
Photovac MicroTIP Statistical Monitoring Report
' Averaging Interval: 1 Readings
15 Seconds
Date Time Min Avg Max Event Status Notes ti
1 30, 91 13: 11 12 . 9 38 . 6 52.0 111 Ready -
10. 4 18. 3 50.0 Ready
' 13 : 12 7 .7 11 . 3 29 .5 112 Ready
29 .5 58 .4 79 .4 Ready
79 . 4 100 117 Ready
' 117 132 145 Ready
13: 13 28. 6 122 153 Ready - �-
13 .2 15. 6 28. 6 Ready
' 12 .2 12 . 9 14.4 Ready
11 . 4 12 . 6 14.5 Ready
13 : 14 11 . 6 19 . 9 55. 8 113 Ready
55. 8 105 136 Ready
' 87 .2 146 162 Ready
16 .2 24. 3 87.2 Ready
13: 15 13.5 14 .5 16.2 114 Ready
13.5 57 .9 88. 1 Ready
88. 1 110 124 Ready
16 . 6 26 .7 ill Ready
' 13 : 16 15 . 1 16 .2 17. 1 Ready
16 . 3 16 . 7 17. 3 Ready
15. 0 16 . 0 17.0 Ready
16. 0 24 . 3 73.0 Ready
' 13 : 17 18 .7 70 .2 128 Ready S g.• ^ 61^1? ^�
15 .3 16 .4 18.7 Ready
15 .4 16 . 3 16. 7 Ready
' 13. 9 14. 5 15.4 Ready
13 : 18 15 . 2 16 .5 17.4 Ready
13 . 9 14 . 9 15.7 Ready
t 13 : 19 13 . 3 14 . 6 24. 8 115 Ready
24 . 8 142 175 Ready -:55 -Z n-Z
37 . 1 81 . 6 175 Ready
28.2 337. 0 37.1 Ready
' 13 : 20 22. 4 25 .5 28.2 Ready
21 . 1 76 . 0 144 116 Ready
46 .5 119 156 Ready
t 34.0 37 . 7 46.5 Ready
26. 9 30 .4 34.0 Ready
13 :21 22 . 6 24 . 7 26. 9 Ready
' 20 . 7 22 . 1 22.7 Ready
18 . 9 78 . 1 187 117 Ready
49 . 6 156 205 Alarm 4
33. 5 37 .7 49. 6 Ready
26 . 3 29 .7 33.5 Ready
13:22 21. 6 23 .7 26.3 Ready
13 :23 20 . 3 39 . 1 121 118 Ready
' 121 157 174 Ready -7. z
36. 8 65 . 6 171 Ready
30 . 9 33 . 6 36.8 Ready
' 13 :24 25 . 9 28 . 5 30.9 Ready
21 . 9 23 . 8 25.9 119 Ready
21 .7 92 . 3 127 Ready
30 .7 41 . 9 102 Ready
' 13 : 25 29 . 3 105 158 120 Ready 537
36 . 6 52 . 7 127 Ready
31 . 1 34. 7 37.0 Ready
26 . 3 28 .9 31 .1 Ready
13:26 24.5 25. 4 26. 3 121 Ready
24 .5 243 353 Alarm
37 . 0 47 .4 86 .5 Ready
' 32 .5 110 382 122 Alarm
40. 9 121 382 Alarm
32 . 6 36. 4 40. 9 Ready
' 13:27 28 . 1 29 .7 32 . 6 123 ' Ready
28 . 1 93.2 126 Ready g 13_c.
36 .8 65. 9 120 Ready
' 13:28 32 . 9 37 . 1 68.5 124 Ready
68 .5 126 148 Ready 5 - Vic•[ .�
38 .9 74.2 140 Ready
' 32 . 6 35.2 38.9 Ready
13:29 28 .5 31 .4 46. 6 125 Ready
46 . 6 102 124 Ready
38 .5 88. 6 126 Ready -�
' 29 . 0 34 .0 38.5 Ready
13:30 28 .9 231 406 126 Alarm
41 .8 65.5 148 Ready
36.2 37 . 9 41. 8 Ready
31 .7 34. 4 37.4 Ready
}3: 31 28. 2 29 . 3 31.7 Ready
' 26'. 3 27 . 3 28.2 Ready
1
1
1
538
-_---_py������►� p7ease noca chat Pbotova<c Insera:�t3oa�u1 Inc.w"4:4
• twarc�s,�9�a.
• effactwa Monday,
new loca,ticn, .
.. ' . Our new address and te£anccna nurr�lcaa
��: • plio-ravAc m -MNAMOHAL INC.
25.3 Jefrya
• West
Deer Pazlk, New�' �7
:-ate i9, 19e3 TQiephcne: (516)254•411.9
�e:vica Dapt: (516)2-44-=
(516) 25ar 4254
• „,: "c$ +rac Qs. FT��GPX C...�-�1.a'-'....: St✓� _ '
-• {I aiQ r to � Wit.t��s.at:cve st�y � `e= zerisr� L�v :'' cam�.a
�� MM . . L.a:
+%'. ,•„z 0�r '1° ' .+3''.�L':'riG' ' :-Q�'�wst� L�.'.7 .:: 03: 4#�5.: �►9!Z'.��"" '� et. thA '
_ .••�,,r t �� .. '{ s, bas bean~ rwi -arA �•-
. t:e a tz 72. _
'mey'bi'tak a to ke 35• a A 150 Rs= za ume .
''• �.�:4a:; s a� riLl. erurs teat r�cass9s �031 3s
• •,: � _......,'. wcla Gem►, is s to ...� !cr'
�• ' ''• s �eJed ia•V.G=m 1 ate'14=a 3 -J 11Y tS.
Dw= -Bed tnr tie vwa *btai:jd tssLw t►ro (2)
• :Y'*''-.�•G�L'�«�;�ects aid t.'--.ss {3)• "'� t...,,,�•�•,.r'�. 'L'•.s �. �a ze..��.-�
arm sOd With 10Q M 2scbc.-tq1eme�6. s:aac:.of tia
•.GV,$ "aria acar-..ed ,da goo m "weave. ;
.Zat= ate.' s r • 'M the last "eC.ti•.� __�' .� +ra�Cr. :;,»
indi=ted that v.= twe 'tea ars s wd t bs;kd.A 'air t A rasp=sa- s-
=hanc•. ed. =a re -, =o....ram'= is Li', ts , '=i T or Mi= c= be ze--..bd.M3.t�
la-'T3.d 41r'i: a ;C?,Jaa ar r'.. at d c. ., r fed...ide.M.
Ney ezt-luL ess; tw M—WR r=A, as 4=d4 czta! i z the abc. e
539
. 2
pleaao o; me yvu a a=r
� T+er�:c�1 St►xr-r..�sf,�cgS.:c��.. :s Lo±"..s��r�
i
1
1 .
r
1
540
.-r rrr--i- i t i r-� s- -}-f-i-=+! �+#:�� 1 1 i ! i r , i r r r I F I• i f=i-}' Fi"+.t.,�
I I—T-=-IF
' isff
• z . . . � a � � f • � f lr : rl � � � � � � r '
_ o � •j• _ ' • • ' _ • w: � _ '� 11 '1�~DTI I � � ,
a ; ` • ; ; ' �. • ins •: ' rt1 •�' �
1 ; srf• •�.• •E.E . • . , . t 'f •t• � IiEE : . . • • i � i � �r
It I�
• r r i I r ZI
, i •�•� 1 i , 1 • .� r i ! � i � � 1 w
Y� • r+.�.,► •+Y • fir . r
,i {
It
• i r' i • . 'l'
1 1•
JF.
jj • 1. 7 1 • 3 ! • ' t ! �r
f r �
low
. t I' � I � 1 . rsl r • . r # • - rll_ . _ . !. � I � Ir
.. + L �.�.� 4 �•f'1 : 1 • ' t ! �' , r''Z � ! � � r l i I ( I � 1 �• I
1
' ` � �.il '�'•' tt ' . . aTK' ICEii ' I �� . . �p ; • . : • : . � ' 541
NUNN In ■ ■w■ i ■ ■■■ ■.m■ w ■■ ■ a ■■/w■ i.■ ■
■■w�iimimaimmni■i■■ ■i i.m.�./.■■■i■.....ii■i■■ on a,
■C■.■a■■■■CC Cra■mr■' ■■■r■■■■■C.R■.■w....■ra■.■.■.�■■■■.r..■■■■■■
C]wa::'ml INSOi:i�ii::i:CaCa C■■■■■■■■C■■■CC ■■■ ■r■a■■■■■r■■.0
■i ■ i i■ ■■■wa■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■aawi■■iw■iw■t■
■ w■ww■■■■i■i■■iwww■ ■■Rr.irwri■■r■wi■■m.■■■■■ ■■■mmawwwm■.mm■rra
�C:: w%Aimonamm::a a:ssounume�iiii:sib::��:��r1����::a'i■RMwi'■■
+ maw ■an C:CiQiCiiii �R ':�iiiC iiiiiiiCiR■J�■GRi■ iii iii:iiQiiiiiw'
:ION amiaiiiO :%n■.iu=■■.ia■ si�0aloi M:�: `�riM■i■■■■imi■
■■.■ ■■.i.R■ . ■rawr■■■■■■i.r
■.■ ■■■■aww■ ■.■■ ■.■.r■■r■■■■■■.■■■■■Raw■.■■■■iR■a■rsm■a■■■■■a/
:C':C::":.•:CCC"C:':"::::::::CC::::C::::::::::::CCC:C::::::: :.
i:i :.� :S.■C.aC.CC.■..� ..C.�C■..■.■..■.■.■■■■■Riamm■..■.■■■m■■■■w■w■
C � C■ =■■i.■R■rrr�■.■■�.■rr■.■■.■■.■.■.w.■e■■■■i■■�riw.e■■nm■iw.
mr wi■ rw ■■ wmwiiiiw■rM�irwwRmR.■■.i�rr�rw�t■w■r■■i■a.w■i...rrw■.wnrrRa■w
Na■i■■iiaairw■■■■wRaww■rw ■m■.mwammMM/.■m■■■1ii■■m■■i■■iarai■.im■a■R.M
./■r■■■aC�E'���C■■■■ �oas■■m■■m■■■wwmm■Munson■alma■man■■ammommi■■ma■
■ ■m ■ i ■ ■■■. own ■■ iiw■■mw■■w■■iimi■■■w■ ■iR■i■Row■war�iw■■■w
� R■ iii ■■ mmw■■■mm■ ar i■w■■■rai■i.■w■■■■■wr■witA.■a.raw■iri.R#■w
L■� "mmi■■■ .■■A.mrwa■Rm■.A■■i■w■.■aiwwmai.wwiaaa■mr■/■■Ria■■ini�■■
� on
■ 0a:C■1CwiR�/i::ai:awrr■ wommumammmixim
■C■a■i■■rwa:■■: 'rRrC■ra:iwi�::: ■m:■■Ilri■rr:� ���:R:ifar�R�'Ca
i'wii*wCCmounmoCCCCrCrCtini:iCACCn:CCtiiarlwliia:CnC=:Aa:nnnCAw
■ NO
��irmm■mi■wi■.R■mamma■iniww■wAra■am.wmRrnw■■■■waii■■.wiwwm
■ ■■wC■■■■■iA..■■�rt■■■■■■■■■ia■a■■r■■a■■■■iww■in■ii■■iA■M■ir■:
■■■■a ■om■■.iiA■ stm■a■iawre■wrrm■■■■■i■ma■■wwwiww■iwaR■■iimmoa
,,, . ■■■■■/■■rimm■■i.i.■■Mmwim■■■■■■■■a■aa■iiirARw/wiiwaim■aR■■i/:
iQQ�aQiiQi:wCCiQQiR:C:::C�CCCC'ciwCCCwQaQQiir■isQiiiiiiiCCCiCwww
CCCC■'iCai:Caw:iiCairi�aaiiw�ir::�'r:Ci,'�C:CCCCCCCrC::iiiw'rwii:C:CC::
.. ..r■■.■■■ii■■■■..■■a■■■■■i.■■■.i■.■w■■■■ ■airwia■amm■i ■■ww.a
MOWER N1iili monwo�R�AtR::nAa'in Mrr ��nCas#ilsmil: �:i:lam eft ■i�1'iMwi Ri
■CC■wrw■iw.i■■■■■.■aww■■■■■w�iii■■ia/■ owimi.■i■miaiii�errwi.w
rs a ■■■/wiswN■■rl■■■R■wi■■■A■i am NOON iriR■iaw■!wr/■iw■r/i■
_ ■Coi■■■■iwi■/■.ws�■■■w■■■■�w■r.�rirAww wiww■.ww■w■■r■.■i■■■ie
aairC:::C:a�:=A�CRifRifRNiirC■i i aw, loan
r:■aa"ammanw■w■.■Girt■ ■i.m� R iw■=5 ■■■■Mwsa�rrrarw■wwi■wm
■iaw■ ■■w■.■i■aiiRww■■Ciowa��is.v OW'd ` sRw.r*i■MR■rAa■i■/r■■
R■ R�■■i�■R■■ai..ii■■i■w■ia►ww■ ■C
■ 'swam �c'C■ aww mama.■ .i■ ■.■wwwa■yrw► er['■■ Inommo::::::::::
CCCiwiCCA::Mw::Cii�:ii�ii:ioi:iC�iQl\►�r:rii■':iiCCiiCiiiM'e:=t�iiiw
■■■■■■■■■w■■r■aria■a.a■■■■.rG■�. ■..■■C■air■ii■i.■■■w■■■wri � -
iiiiiiiii� [ii:liC ii'�"i►�Ca:r'���C�a'�':'■"■�����i�i:�'r:�ir�
■■r■■w■■■■wiiri�/iw■Cims
■■i /,A.■■ACrwR.14wrerMwiwR■■.wmwr■■r■■wN■
aww■ ■wiwww/A■■i■■r■w/■■ wiwwiA►`ww iw■■w■■i■ar■m■■■wiiw■w.
am MEN
■■AR■■w� n.� ■mi..iii.■■■r■w.iar■R f
MEN wCC'l'CCaCr'�awRws'ia'i'ew:Ci:iC:CRC mom on ►�iC'":C�'rw`CaiC'i:CiM:w:::
■■■�■■■■■ ■■m■w.A■■wr■mrm■ ■■/mann■��an�i�iw■■■iMwa�i■■■i■■■■/
■■■■a■r.RR.■ ■■■i■Nrr■ ■■■.■mm..■■■i■�■■■ ■■►r■ 'r.a■■i■w.miai■/.aww■
■ .■ ■ ■■■�...■■ ■r�■■m■ ■Riam■■■■■■.■r�■. f ' ■■■■■m■i■a■mr■■w■i
on�0 P"N Mam'C:Rpm swommo�i'risCaiCCiCrii:\�rn���i��■:*a:�:a:�n:At�%wC
wwrw�rrwwww■w■air■■
■.Mwm w■i ■ ri■ai '� ■iw■/■wr■wNrw■ ■w■■■■■ iamb,■►rrrrrA■r . NONE■
annon :�'asommo:: i0CC*w'r::w010w=CCIMENNUw':iwNwev iCCCCC'.ww:C'■ONE
"Coca:rmilson'�Noun
�mass MENOMONIE
Hill: OmanCC�#' + isrC�'�'n::Ra:nAR:::nw�M:n�n:nn�•�N:nn�s�A:w%::
Umanamm sammame'�a■n CQiC■`'C:CiiCiaCC��:�C'::::Cr'■CarriCw�:'�CCC:CCCCCCi
C' a 011 win C% i■ennis :'CC:" '':;:Rmm mammon
�. Q� C:C ism■CCOC'w:ii Cmom CaC-aCC MEMO:C:a'rRrC::'w:r"eC:"I:C:R'a � ::C:C`"l::
HD
im ■■■ w ' ::: 0'as:'rwin a mu:mni � 1M WI NEE■ ■ Room ■r' ■C ./A.nMM �rw'C'::■C'::r?�i' ::rirr'r:':? q'CwCwi■ w Ciww m nwA. ia�:�i=■■■■■mC=■■
r C'i:■■■CC■mmw:w�■oM. ■■rww■■ww■■r■■wwCwwrw■wrwwwiCiiwwr+wmwMrwww■Sir■■r
�r■■war ■■■ ■r■■r■wr nN�e won
■ w■ ■�1i iw■w■■.r■■w;w■■■■■■wMwrrw wrrr■* taste■►r n■
5 RON "mom � N iOW rrrwr.war��rw..w.rs�rrr��rrrrr■.r�Qr■w.�.r���r.
w .rw ereiwwi',Cirwwr7wCi�rOiiie~r:� �i�Ciiw��'nrii:��:::isii■ . ri
� A N U
1 �
V � •V
r,• H 1
O � •r :��
1
MR �
z � z
y � v
}
m
J 543
' Laboratories,Inc. FORT [,AUDERDALE •SAVANNAH
• I
CLIENT E.P.R.S. DATE REPORTED: 08/06/91 . •, t
' SAMPLE LOCATION TANK EXCAVATION/9 EPA: I FLO95
SAMPLE NUMBER 002-080291 FL DRINKING WATER: # 86144
DATE RECEIVED 08/02/91 FL ENVIRONMENTAL: E86006
DATE SAMPLED 07/29/91 GEORGIA: , 828
1 SAMPLE TYPE WATER SOUTH CAROLINA: 1 96015
SUBMITTER PAUL J. MARANDO
TEST RESULTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------
' PURG AROMATICS EPA 602 POSITIVE
METHYLTERTBUTYLETHER 185. 0 ug/1
TOTAL XYLENES EPA 602 240. 0 UG/L
' IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME.
DONALD S. MCCORQUODALE, JR. PH.D.
' MICROBIOLOGIST
1
1
1
1
4550 N. DWO Hwy..FI, Laudwdal..Fla.33334•Phw*:130%4atJ69%■$30 In01an Sir«I.Savannah,Ga.31401.P%ono M12)236,'A o 544
�u Iffflf II �l
Laborikhx4s, InC. FORT LAUDERDALE a SAVANNAH
-CERTIFICATIONS-
EPA: #FLO95
CLIENT:E.P.R.S./002-080291 FL DRINKING WATER: #86144
SAMPLE:TANK EXCAVATION - 912321 FL ENVIRONMENTAL: #E86006
DATA FILE:>80506: :D4 GA # 828
DATE ANALYZED: 8/05/91 21:56 SC # -96015
ILUTION FACTOR: 1.00000
' $PA METHQQ_602 PURGEABLE ORGANICS
CONCENTRATION *MDL
FAS No. PARAMETER (ug/1) (ug/1)
-----
- -^ �
43-2 BENZENE 14 .9 (0.20)
8-90--7 CHLOROBENZENE - 0.0 (0.20)
Sp 1 a DICHLOROBENZENE 0. 0 (0.20)
541-73-1 m-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0 . (0. 20)
16-46-7 p-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0 (0. 20)
0-41-1 ETHYLBENZENE 0.0 (0. 20)
108-88-3 TOLUENE 11.0 (0. 11)
1
1
1
* ACTUAL DETECTION LIMIT METHOD DETECTION LIMIT x DILUTION FACTOR
value of 0. 0 - BMDL (BELOW METHOD DETECTION LIMIT)
' LY
O#tE A. aYOHNSON — Chemist
' 4550 N,01sw Hwy.,Ft.Lauderdale.Fla.33334 a Phone:")491-4401•E30 Indian Street,Savannah. as.31401. Phone(w)2-i&S 0 545
IMAGE QUALITY
AS YOU REVIEW THE NEXT GROUP OF IMAGES, PLEASE NOTE
THAT THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS WERE OF POOR QUALITY.
546
w 1,.
' 13 {�
Z
x �
_ N M
at
cum
� o
'.
Z At '
547
1
Laboratories.Inc. FORT LAUDERDALE •SAVANNAH
' CLIENT EPRS DATE REPORTED: 08/31/91.
SAMPLE LOCATION 912321 EPA: *4 FLO95
' SAMPLE NUMBER 022--082691 FL DRINKING WATER: # 86144
DATE RECEIVED 08/26/91 FL ENVIRONMENTAL: I E86006
DATE SAMPLED 08/26/91 GEORGIA: f 828
SAMPLE TYPE WATER SOUTH CAROLINA: 1 96015
SUBMITTER PAUL MARANDO
TEST RESULTS
---- -'----------------..-----_---__-----_—_-----------_---.._____—_—
' EPA 610 POSITIVE
PURG AROMATICS EPA 602 POSITIVE
TOTAL XYLENES EPA 602 408.0 UG/L
' METHYLTERTBUTYLETHER 310.0 ug/l
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME.
' VODA�LE,�z
DONALD S. MCC TR. PH.D.
MICROBIOLOGIST
4550 N. DIxto Miry.. Ft.Lauaaraaja, Fla,33334•phom:(sm)aoi-am.ex►ndian s:r.a.savannah.Ga.vvi.ftww"sm 23&&M 548
L.awboratorfea, Inc. FORT LAUDERAALE•SAVANNAH
-CERTIFICATIONS-
EPA: #FLO95
CLIENT:E.P.R.S./022-082691 FL DRINKING WATER: #86144
SAMPLE:912321 FL ENVIRONMENTAL: 086006
DATA FILE:>82906: :DB GA # 828
DATE ANALYZED: 8/29/91 25:58 SC # 96015
11LUTION FACTOR: 1.00000
' EPA_METHOD 603 -, PURGEABLE ORGANICS
t-AS No. PARAMETER CONCENTRATION (ug/1)
------------- ------
-43-2 BENZENE 89.0 (0.20)
8-90-7 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0 (0.20)
-50-1 o-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0 (0.20)
541-73-1 m-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0. (0.20)
16-46-7 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0 (0.20)
0-41-1 ETHYLBENZENE 126.0 (0.20)
108-88-3 TOLUENE 223.0 (0.11)
1
* ACTUAL DETECTION LIMIT METHOD DETECTION LIMIT x DILUTION FACTOR
value of 0. 0 .• BMDL (BELOW METHOD DETECTION LIMIT)
ALBERT CAST L NQS - Chemist
4SSO N. 01sw Hwy„Ft.Uudefdala, Fla.333U■Phone'.(3M 4014691■4W Inplan S;ra41.Sarannafl,Ga.31401•Phona Ml: 93MO O 549
l,aboratorloa,Inc. FORT LAUDERDALE•SAVANNAH
' -CERTIFICATIONS-
EPA: FL095
CLIENT:E.P.R.S./022-082691 FL DRINKING WATER: #86144
' SAMPLE:912321 FL NVIRONMENTAL: #E86006
DATA FILE:>R810A: :D3 GA 828
DATE ANALYZED: 8/29/91 19:40 SC 96015
�LUTION FACTOR: 1. 00000
E,PA__MEjffQD 610
- --- - - CONCENTRATION * MDL
CAS No. PARAMETER (ug/1) (ug/1)
83-32-9 ACENAPHTHENE -0.0 -0.50
208-96-8 ACENAPHTHYLENE _ 0.0 0.50
120-12-7 ANTHRACENE 111.0 1.00
56-55-3 BENZO a ANTHRACENE 0.0 1.00
50-32-8 BENZO a PYRENE 0.0 2.00
,205-99-2 BENZO b FLUORANTHENE 0.0 1.25
' 191�-24-�2 BENZO g i) PERYLENE 0.0 2 .50
207-08•-9 BENZO k FLUORANTHENE 0.0 1.25
218-01-9 CHRYS NI 0. 0 2.50
53-70-32 DIBENZO(ah)ANTHRACENE 0.0 1.00
206-44-0 FLUORANTHENE 76:0 1.00
86-73-7 FLUORENE 33 .4 0.50
193-39-5 INDENO{{1 2 3-cd) PYRENE 0.0 0.50
91-20--3 NAPHTHALIN* 288.0 0. 50
85-01-8 PHENANTHRENE 0.0 1.00
129-00-0 PYRENE 82. 0 1. 00
_ MISCELLANEOUSA.NALYTEE
1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 293.0 0. 50
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 248.0 0. 50
* MDL METHOD DETECTION LIMIT - -Is actually MDL * DILUTION FACTOR.
' - 71remis
a�.
4550 N. DIM@ Hwy., Ft, lauuarCala. Fla.33334•Phone:(314)491•4401 0630 Indian SIrNI.Sarannah,Ga.31401 Phone(9121 2365= 550
as e.•.• man snerM ,..
..-• � Florida Department of EnvironmenW Regulation
�.� 7vnn lbvA=k�rrtre Skis. a 26M ft dr Srane ft4 • 'b2zhauea MC142 32399.24M
Discharge Reporting Form
tie the form to notify Me Departmerd of En►ironmenW Regulation d.
AmAs d tank tightness w t;np that exceed allowable tolerances within ten days of receipt d tasir result �
Petroleum dactwges eximedIng 25 gallons on pervious surfaces as described in Section 17 761460 FAZ within one wortang dal,of discovery,
3. Hazardous substance{CERCLA regulated),discharges exceeding applicable reportable quantities established in 17.761.464(2)F.A.G.within
one working day of the disca4ery.
Within one woriring clay d discovery of suspected releases coMrmed by.(a) released regulated substances or pollutants discovered in
the s uriounding area.(b)unusual and unexplained storage ayatem operating Cvdbons.(c)mortloring results from a leak detection method
or from a tank closure assessment that kKftate a reiesse may have occurred,or(d)mwwal tank gauging results for rerun of&W gallons
or fens, exceeding ten gallons per weeky test or rive goons averaged over four consecutho weekly foods.
Mad to the DER Diseict Office in your area fisted on the reverse side d this form
' PLEASE PRINT OR JYPE
Complete all appiieabld blanks
DER Facility ID Number N 2. Tank Number. NL.4 3. Date: 113b
Facility Name: •f- rr ¢
Facility Owner or Operator. ,tea b 1.� t c?e✓,�� Lr►'�Qn
Facility Address: { l
Telephone Number�� �� County:
' Mailing Address: i'el i.Aire r;., it -104 Q,-19ag le-,Q c G.w I G.A" ' 1. 3 AYe
Date of receipt of test results or discovery: r Nei 1 montlddaylyear
Method d irtitial discovery. (circle one only)
A. Liquid detector(automatic or manual) M Emptying and Inspection. F. Vapor or visible signs d a discharge in the vicinity.
ELVapor detector (automatic a manual) E. Invedaory d7onlyd. G. Closure: =: .C M Aacs sue. e,kplain)
C. Tphtness lest (underground tanks only). H. Other.
j 7. Estimated number of gallons discharged:
! , What part d storage system has leaked? (circle all that apply) A. Dispenser B. Pipe C. Fitting D. Tank U
9. Type d regulated substance discharged. (circle one)
A. kuWled-ciAmiline D. vehicular diesel L use&wsiste cil V. harardows substance includes pesticides. ammonia,
l3. unleaded gasain F. aviation gas chlorine"derivatives(write in name or Chemical Abstract
G gasohol G. jet fuel O. rm-Aube oil Serwice CAS number)
Z other (write in name)
1' Cauae`4LJ*ak (arch aft that apply)
A. link C. Loose connection E. Puncture G. Spill I. Other (specity)
1� 13�t311t' D. Corrosion F. Installation failure H. Overfil
TYPO of financial responsibility. (circle one) .�_. .
A. Third parry insurance provided by the state insurance contractor 16. Not applicabl4/
9. Self-insurance pursuant to Chapter 17.769,500.FA.G D. None
V. To the [seat of mw knowledge and belief oil Infa m idon submitted an this form Is trus. accurate, and eompleto.
Pnned Name of Owner Operator or Auth n R i no
. Authorized epreeerxasrve Signature d Owner. Operator a Authorized Repress 551
..,...a..a
1
1
1
' APPENDIX B
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM
' PRELIMINARY CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
1
1
1 552
_�f. 9r��`Y•
l r"
y
lient #: 47M
lient Name:MISSYMER AND ASSOCIATES'+ t ti e' Page: 1
ddress: 14750 NW 77 AVE SUITE 110 Date: 03-16-1992
MIAMI,FL 33016 Log 0: 1534-1 ,
1 `
Sample Description:MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES Label:MW-4
ME1-619 MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC Date Sampled: 03/10/92
TAVERNIER KEY Date Received: 03/11/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS Collected By:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
larameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
lOA in Water ug/1 5030/8021 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
enzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
C, 2, -Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
oluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
TBE 6.2 ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene 2 .5 ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
1otal Xylenes 2 .3 ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
IBDL - Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standar .M thods
IOMPQAP I 90--0376-G f
RS #86240 Re t y S i� ed,
SUB HRSJ 86122 , 86109, E86048
Je lass
1 L r t ry Director
' 1534-1
1
:,- 553
1
lient 1: 47M
lient Name:MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES Page: 1
ddress: 14750 NW 77 AVE SUITE 110 Date: 03-16-1992
MIAMI,FL 33016 Log #: 1534-2 . .
-
Sample Description:MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES Label:MW-6
' .ME1-619 MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC Date Sampled: 03/10/92
TAVERNIER KEY Date Received: 03/11/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS Collected By:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
laraineter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
tOA in Water ug/1 5030/8021 03/11/92 03/11/92 , GP
enzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
(, 2 ,-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
oluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
TBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
ithyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
otal Xylenes 1. 0 ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
, 3-Dichlorobenzens BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
BDL - Below Detection Limits-
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Sta rad Methods
OMPQAP 190-0376-G
kRS #86240 Fb
ull itted,
UB HRS,J 86122, 86109, E86048
Glass
' ory Director
1534-2
t
1
1
554
1
lient ,#: 47M
lient Name:MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES Page: 1
ddress: 14750 NW 77 AVE SUITE 110 Date: 03-16-1992
MIAMI,FL ' 33016 Log #: 1534-3 .
Sample Description:MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES Label:MW-1
' ME1-619 MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC Date Sampled: 03/10/92
TAVERNIER KEY Date Received: 03/11/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS Collected By:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
tarameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
tOA in Water ug/1 5030/8021 03/11/92 03/11/92_ GP
enzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
(, 2, -Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
oluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
TBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
tthyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
otal Xylenes 1. 3 ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
, 3-Dichlorobenzone BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/11/92 03/11/92 GP
tBDL - Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standar Mgthods
OMPQAP # 90--0376-G
kRS ,#86240 FJee
ly S ed,
�UB HRS# 86122, 86109 , E86048
G1 ss
Director
1534-3
1
1
1
555
eD Q r
r
fiF
1 ~- a
� z �
0
G G a°
x
1 c
1'.
O ,
z; A
556
1
1
1
1
1
' APPENDIX C
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
' FROM CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
t
1
1
1
1
1
1 557
.! 3 0 1992 -MAR 3 0 d,992MAR
iCLIENT # 4 7M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1595-1 -
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 1
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal . ,
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst.
EPA 8021 in water ug/1 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Bromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1, 2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3--Di.chloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Methylene Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1, 1 , 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5036/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
558
1 -
CLIENT # 47M
'ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-1
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 1
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
'Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
l
Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2.0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Fluorene: BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Phenanthrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 .0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2.0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2.0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 .0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
' Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 .5 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3.5 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 .0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
FIn deno-(1,2 ,3, -CD) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 4.0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
benzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 4.0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
Dibenzo (G,H,I) Perylene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 6. 0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
! 1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 .0 03/25/92 03/25/92 'MF
2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 .0 03/25/92 03/25/92 MF
EDB BDL ug/l 504 0.02 03124/92 03/24/92 FY
TRPH BDL mg/l 418.1 2.0 03/23/94 03/24/92 JV
Lead BDL mg/l 239.2 0.005 03/23/94 03/24/92 JK
* BDL - Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM*USG or S n rd Methods
' QAP # 90-0376G f ubmitted,
HRS # 86356,86240
SUB HRS# 86122 , $6109 , E86048
' S. Glassory Director
1 1595-1
559
1.
'CLIENT , 4 7M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992,
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 0: 1595-2
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 2
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in water ug/1 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
IBromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
`2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 'GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP -
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5.0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Methylene Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 ,2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1111, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
IBenzene 38.0 ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene 8 . 0 ug/l 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
_ MTBE 81. 0 ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene 19 . 0 ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
-. Total Xylenes 125 . 0 ug/1 5030/8021 5. 0 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
560
1
CLIENT 0 47M
' ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG ,#: 1595-2
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 2
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
' Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date . Analyst
EPA 610 in water ug/1 3510/8270 03/26/92 03/26/92 .GP
' Naphthalene 230 ug/1 3510/8270 20.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Acenaphthylene 24. 0 ug/1 3510/8270 20. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP -
Acenaphthene 40 ug/l 3510/8270 20.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
' Fluorene 38 ug/l 3510/8270 20.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Phenanthrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 20.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 20. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
' Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 20. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 20. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 30.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Chrysene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 35.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP -
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 35.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 35.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 30. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
' Indeno-(1,2 , 3 , -CD)Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 40. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 40. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 60.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
' 1-Methyl Naphthalene 280 ug/1 3510/8270 20.0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
2--Methyl Naphthalene 400 ug/1 3510/8270 20. 0 03/26/92 03/26/92 GP
EDB BDL ug/l 504 0.02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
TRPH 420.0 mg/1 418 . 1 2 .0 03/23/92 03/24/92 JV
' Lead 0. 038 mg/1 239 .2 0.005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
' QAP 190-0376G R p full mitted,
HRS # 86356,86240
SUB HRS�` 86122, 86109 , E86048
J S. "Glass
r Y ry Director
1595-2
561
1
CLIENT 147M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26--1992
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-3
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 3
' MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
r Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
1EPA 8021 in water ug/1 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,Bromoform
Bromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23192 GP
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1' 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1,1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Methylene Chloride - BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
562
CLIENT 0 47M
' ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG f: 1595-3 . .- .
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 3
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
' EPA 610 in water ug/1 3510/0270 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF -
Acenaphthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Fluorene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Phenanthrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Chrysene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF '
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Indeno- (1, 2 , 3 ,-CD)Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Dibenzo (G,H,I) Perylene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 6. 0. 03/25/92 03/26/92 . MF
1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
EDB BDL ug/l 504 0. 02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
' TRPH BDL mg/1 418. 1 2 . 0 03/23/92 03/24/92 JV
Lead 0. 220 mg/1 239. 2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
' QAP J 90-0376G fu ubmitted,
HRS j 86356, 86240
SUB HRSJ $6122, 86109 , E86048 f
' f S. Glass
tory Director
1
1595-3
563
..... . ... . . .. .
1
1
�LIENT # 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 0: 1595-4
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 4
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
' Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in Water ug/l 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
FBromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
romomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
IDichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 -GP
'1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dich'loroprcipane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1 Trans-1,3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.' 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11, 1, 1-Trichloroathane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0:5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
FTrichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
enzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'MTBE 2 . 5 ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
564
1
CLIENT # 47M
' ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-4
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 4
ME1-619 . DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
' EDB BDL ug/1 504 0. 02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
Lead 0. 008 mg/1 239.2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 TK
* BDL - Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Stand rd Methods
' QAP # 90-0376G Xey.
mitted,
HRS # 86356, 86240
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109, E86048
' Glass
Director
' 1595-4
1
1
1
565
1
'CLIENT 147M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110r DATE: 03-26-1%92
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1595-5
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 5
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
' Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
' EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Bromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Di2-Dilchlorobenzenee BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 . GP
1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25192 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1,1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Benzene 210 ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Toluene 250 ug/l 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
MTBE 1400 ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
' Ethyl Benzene 610 ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
Total Xylenes 850 ug/1 5030/8021 50 03/25/92 03/25/92 GP
566
i
1
1
CLIENT 147M
1 ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 0: 1595-5 .
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 5
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
1 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
IParameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
1 EDB BDL ug/1 504 0. 02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
Lead BDL mg/1 239.2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or StaSdand Methods
1 QAP 190-0376G sp 1 witted,
HRS j 86356, 86240
SUB HRSJ 86122 , 86109, E86048
1 J r y Glass
t ry Director
1 1595-5
1
1
1
567
CLIENT 0 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992 -
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1595-6
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 6
' ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
' Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
EPA 8021 in water ug/1 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromomethane BDL ug/l . 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
IDibromochloromethane BDL - ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
I1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
fIinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/i 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
FTethylene
rans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 ,2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
568
1
1
CLIENT 147M
'ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG f; 1595--6
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
`SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 6
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date 'Date Analyst
'EDB BDL •ug/l 504 0.02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
Lead 0.007 mg/l 239.2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Stand d Methods
'QAP j 90-0376G sp c y S fitted,
HRS j 86356,86240
SUB HRS# 86122, 86109, E86048
' J y S Glass
o a or Director
1595-6
1
569
1
1
CLIENT # 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-199.2 .
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-7
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 7
' MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
tDetection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
IBromoform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromomethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l2-chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
I1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug%1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1 , 2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
iTrans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Methylene Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/l • 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11 , 1, 2-Trichloroethane
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
lMTBE BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
570
1
1
1 -
CLIENT 147M
' ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-7
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND, ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 7
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
t MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
' Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
' EDB BDL ug/1 504 0. 02 03/24/92 03/24/92 .FY
Lead 0. 110 mg/l 239.2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Naphthalene ' BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2. 0 63/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluorene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2.0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Phenanthrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 •MF
' Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 .5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 .5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Indeno- (1, 2, 3,-CD) Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 6 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' 2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
TRPH BDL mg/l 418. 1 2 . 0 03/23/92 03/24/92 JV
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Stan F ethods
' QAP # 90-0376G es e t ully S ted,
HRS 86356, 86240
SUB HRSJ 861220 86109 , E86048
J r Glass
r t ry Director
1595-7
571
1
'CLIENT , 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG f: 1595-8
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 8
' ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'Bromomethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 .GP
' 1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1 ,1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
'Methylene Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
572
1
CLIENT # 47M
'ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-8
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 8
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
' GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date -Analyst
IEDB BDL ug/l 504 0.02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
Lead BDL mg/l 239. 2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Naphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
'Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluorene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
IPhenanthrene BDL , ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2.0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
l
Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Indeno- (1, 2, 3, -CD) Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
IDibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 6. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
TRPH BDL mg/1 418 . 1 2 . 0 03/23/92 03/24/92 JV
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
'All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Sta a Methods
'QAP # 90-0376G R s e ul y mitted,
HRS # 86356, 86240
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109, E86048
J r S. lass
b ' ory Director
' 1595-8
' 573
'CLIENT f 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992 .
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1595-9 ' "
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 9
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l
Bromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l2-Chloroethylvinyl, ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11,1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11, 1,1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene. BDL ug/l 5030/8,021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE 7.3 ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
574
1
1
CLIENT # 47M
' ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 0: 1595-9 .
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 9
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92 .
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
' Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date . Analyst
' EDB BDL ug/1 504 0.02 03/24/92 03/24/92 .FY
Lead 0 .007 mg/1 239. 2 0. 005 03/23/92 03/24/92 JK
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF .
Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluorene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Phenanthrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF .
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 .5 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
Indeno- (1, 2 , 3,-CD) Pyrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 4 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 .0 03/25/92 03/26/92 ' MF
Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 6. 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
' 2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 03/25/92 03/26/92 MF
TRPH BDL mg/1 418 . 1 2 . 0 03/23/92 03/24/92 JV
* BDL = Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
QAP 190-0376G rj3r07,' try
11 mitted,
HRS # 86356, 86240
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109, E86048
lass
Director
1595-9
575
1
�LIENT 47M
DDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 0: 1595-10
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
'AMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 10
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
tPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
romodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
iromoform BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
romomethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
arbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
CChloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
hloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
(ibromochloromethane BDL ug/1. 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
t, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
ichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
hlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
(rans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
is-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
(rans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
ethylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/i 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
11, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
--Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
-Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE 4 .9 ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 .5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
-total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
576
CLIENT # 47M
'ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-10
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW 10
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
tGROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date - Analyst
IEDB BDL ug/l 504 0. 02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
Lead BDL mg/l 239. 2 0. 005 02/23/92 03/24/92 JK
t* BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Stan -rd Methods
r
'4 AP 90-0376G R s c 11 itted
� P
HRS # 86356, 86240
SUB HRS# 86122, 86109 , E86048
' J f ass
r t ry Director
t1595-10
1
1
577
L
LIENT , 47M
DDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04--30-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1840-2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW-11D
' •ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
' Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in water ug/1 5030/8021 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
,Bromoform
Bromomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 .5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,2-Dichlorobenzone BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
lDichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
f1inyl Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
, 2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
'Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
11, 1, 1-Trichloroathane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
- MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 .5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
578
1
1
CLIENT # 47M
'ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04-30-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1840-2 ,
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW-11D
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
' MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date 'Analyst
'TRPH BDL mg/l 418 .1 2 . 0 04/23/92 04/24/92 JV
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF '
'Acenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Fluorene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Phenanthrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
l
Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 .0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Benzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Benzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
'Benzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Indeno-(1, 2, 3 ,-CD) Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 4. 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 .MF
'Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 6 .0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
1-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 .0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
2--Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Lead 0. 046 mg/1 239 . 2 0. 005 04/22/92 04/28/92 JK
EDB BDL ug/l 504 0. 02 04/29/92 04/29/92 FY
'* BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
'QAP # 90-0376G Respectfully Submitted,
HRS #` 86356, 86240 i f
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109 , E86048S.
rey S. Glass
aboratory Director
1840-2
579
'CLIENT #` 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04-30-,1992
' MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1840-•3
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: 14W-12D
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
fBromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
romomethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
arbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
l2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29192 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
'Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
lDichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
'Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
,Trans-1,3-Dichloropropen
Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 .5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
'1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
FTrichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
enzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/29/92 04/29/92 GP
580
CLIENT # 47M
fDDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04-30-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1840-3
'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: MW-12D
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
' MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit . Date Date -Analyst
'Lead BDL mg/l 239.2 0. 005 04/22/92 04/28/92 .JK
EDB BDL ug/1 504 0. 02 04/29/92 04/29/92 FY
l*
BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
1QAP I 90--0376G (Respectfully Subm ted,
HRS 1 86356,86240 ,
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109, E86048
rey S. Glass
Laboratory Director
1840-3
1
1 •
581
t
'CLIENT # 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-19.92
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1595-11
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: EQUIPMENT BLANK
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
' MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
'EPA 8021 in Water ug/1 5030/8021 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1 Bromomethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
l2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
f1ibromochloromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 ,GP
11 ,1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
, 1,2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
,Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Methylene Chloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021. 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
' Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP ,
Ethyl Benzene 0 .7 ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes 5 . 0 ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 03/23/92 03/23/92 GP
1 582
i
i
' CLIENT # 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 03-26-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG 1: 1595-11 .
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: EQUIPMENT BLANK
' ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 03/20/92
MONROE CO. PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/92
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
1 Detection Extr. Anal
Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date "Analyst
EDB BDL ug/1 504 0.02 03/24/92 03/24/92 FY
* BDL - Below Detection Limits
' All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
'
R s ec uz1y fitted QAP ,� 90-�0376G ,
HRS 86356, 86240
SUB HRSJ 86122 , 86109, E86048
1 Je fr y S ass
L o at Director
1595-11
1 .
i
583
'31�
CLIENT ,# 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 1
' 14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04-30-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG #: 1840-1
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: EQUIPMENT BLANK
MEl-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
' BLANK WATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY:CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal ,
' Parameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
EPA 8021 in water ug/l 5030/8021 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Bromodichloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Bromoform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Bromomethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Carbon Tetrachloride BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
' Chloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDL ug/l 5030/$021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Chloroform BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
' Chloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Dibromochloromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0 .5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
' 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Dichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Chlorobenzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1 Vinyl Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1, 1-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
' 1, 1-Dichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1, 2-Dichloropropane BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23192 GP
' Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropen BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Methylene Chloride BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0 . 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1, 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethan BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Tetrachloroethene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Trichloroethene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Trichlorofluoromethane BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0.5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Benzene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Toluene BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
MTBE BDL ug/1 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Ethyl Benzene BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
Total Xylenes BDL ug/l 5030/8021 0. 5 04/23/92 04/23/92 GP
584
1
1
1
�LIENT # 47M
ADDRESS: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES PAGE: 2
' 14750 NW 77 CT. SUITE 110 DATE: 04-30-1992
MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 LOG ,#: 184 0--1
ATTN: ISIDRO DUQUE
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATE LABEL: EQUIPMENT BLANK
ME1-619 DATE SAMPLED: 04/21/92
MONROE CTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/92
BLANK WATER ANALYSIS COLLECTED BY: CLIENT
Detection Extr. Anal
arameter Result Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst
RPH BDL mg/1 418 . 1 2 . 0 04/23/92 04/24/92 TV
EPA 610 in water ug/l 3510/8270 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
lNaphthalene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
jhcenaphthylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Acenaphthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
rluorene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
phenanthrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
ityrene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
enzo (A) Anthracene BDL ug/l 3510/8270 3 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Chrysene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
tenzo (L) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
enzo (K) Fluoranthene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 5 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Benzo (A) Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 3 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
IIndeno-(1,2 , 3,-CD)Pyrene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Dibenzo (A,H) Anthracene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 4 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Dibenzo (G,H, I) Perylene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 6. 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
il-Mathyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
2-Methyl Naphthalene BDL ug/1 3510/8270 2 . 0 04/25/92 04/25/92 MF
Lead BDL mg/1 239.2 0. 005 04/22/92 04/28/92 JK
EDB BDL ug/1 504 0. 02 04/29/92 04/29/92 FY
`* BDL = Below Detection Limits
All analyses were performed using EPA, ASTM, USGS, or Standard Methods
1QAP # 90-0376G Res ectfully Submitted,
_HRS 86356, 86240
SUB HRS# 86122 , 86109, E86048 ! 1��� -'' �, ` r•`
` 1 0�etfvef S. Glass,,k f ~�
Labzi7atory Director
1840-1
585
1 QNN
c� x
x � X
XI S< ICI d X
W
Z :,
U �: Z
rs <✓
no v
�C x x X Z
Z0'd -1d10i
.� � •a �..� r -:tip._- ,� .�..� �
U
�7j
ml
xl
K \ �kk
.� �LyY. o[ai ; ��•-r �: tip.1 _«.`_ ' •
cc V
' - �n � r +• — �t F.:t fit! i.�'•' •r y•--
��r1�-
h { Y :. •~.ter;.
'YAM [��/j .f�. _' •. r'- a �i� .. •• f
. . U yCy, ,fir• _ !,
wo 44cri
cl
..1 -
C
? 587 �
vi�
q
1
1
' APPENDIX D
SLUG TEST DATA AND CALCULATIONS
1
1
1
1
588
BOUWER & RICE EQUATION
Rc*Rc * ln(Re/Rw) 1
K ------------------ * --- * ln(Y1/Y2)
2*Le T
For partially penetrating wells the term ln(Re/Rw) is:
1---------------------- ---------------------
( 1. 1 A + B * ln( (H - Lw)/Rw) )
' ln(Pte/Rw) _ (----------- + ---------------------------)
( ln(Lw/Rw) Le/Rw )
�) For fully penetrating wells the term ln(Re/Rw) is:
1
'
1 - C= ( --- - ---- ---- )
( ln(Lw/Rw) Le/Rw )
here K a hydraulic conductivity
Rc radius of well/screen casing
Re effective radial distance over which
delta-y is dissipated
Rw = borehole radius
H = saturated thickness of aquifer
A = the Bouwer and Rice 'A' parameter
B = the Bouwer and Rice 'B' parameter
' C - the Bouwer and Rice 'C' parameter
Lw = depth below water table to bottom of screen
Le = length of wetted screen
' Y1 = drawdown (or up) at time T1
Y2 - drawdown (or up) at time T2
T = time between T1 and T2
�} U.S . NAVY EQUATION FOR A CASED BOREHOLE WITH SCREEN
t - Re
---Rc-*-----
* ln(Le/Rw) * ln(Y1/Y2)
2 * Le * T
3 ) HVORSLEV EQUATION FOR A CASED BOREHOLE WITH SCREEN
F 4 * Rc- - -* Rc { 2 * m * Le ) m * Le- - -
* In { - - - - ) for - - -
> 4
8 * Le * BT L { 2 * Rw ) 2 * Rw
' m = square root of horizontal, to vertical
hydraulic conductivity ratio
BTL = basic time lag, time at 63% of full recovery
If static water level occurs in screened interval Rc is adjusted:
Re = SQRT( (1-n) *Rc*RC + (n) *Rw*Rw]
_where n is specific yield of sand/gravel pack in well annulus
589
POOR ORIGINAL
]RIABLES for well: 14W-10
Adjusted Rc = 0. 182 ft, ( 2. 18 inches)
' Rw = 0. 333 ft, 4 . 00 inches
H = 89.79 ft
A = 2. 22 (dimensionless)
B = 0. 32 (dimensionless)
(Re/Rw) = 1 .83 (partially penetrating)
C = 1 . 57 (dimensionless)
ln (Re/Rw) = 2 . 31 (fully penetrating)
Lw = 7. 10 ft
Le = 7 . 10 ft
Y1 - 1. 75 ft
Y2 - 0. 65 ft
' T = 0.04 minutes
BTL = 0.04 minutes
m = 1.73
FT/DAY GPD/FTA2
luwer & Rice, 1976 : --------- -_------
Partially penetrating well : N&MMIM16
,Fully penetrating well: K - 191.86 1435.1
S. NAVY, 1974 : K - 254 .32 1902 .3
ORSLEV, 1951: K - 301.73 2256.9
1
1
1
1
590
MEI - 579 Slug Tests
MW-- 7 0 (Slug out)
10
Drawdown (ft)
.._................ .....................j.1•.............:..........':.............•....... ..........................j...�......................
.......,.............. ............I-.........
j. ........................j........................ ........................j........................
...............I....... ...................... ........................................................i......................,.
•........................t......................... ........................i•......................i............................i..........,.............
t
........ _ ........................i. ...................... ......................... .....................
1 ...................... '
1 1
........ ................. ............................5...........................i............................1...........................i...........................
................................. .........................
1 ..................................................... .........................i............................j...................... .................. _...........-......
■
a. 1
....................... ............... ......................
...................... .� ...... .......
1 .................................................. s .....................
■
1 .............................................................................i...........................;............................i............................i...... ................i..
' ■
0.01
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
tTime Sec
1
591
1
' Terra8 Data Collection Report
' Firmware Version 6. 1/87
Number of Bytes in Data Dump 1732
User Supplied Comment ME1619-3
Time Header Block Loaded 1992/05/11 15:51*51.90
' Time Data File Dumped 1992/05/11 16:23 : 28. 00
Remaining Memory 63804
Number of Logs 161
' Type of Data Memory Memory Board
Logs/Timestamp 1
Power was OK During Data Collection Period
' Date Tuesday May 19 , 1992 4 : 18 PM
PlotFile B: \ME361901. PRN
DataFile B: \ME1619-3
ME1619-3
' Time of First Log in Specified window
33735 . 66 0. 661016
' 0. 661045 Analog#01
KW-10
Date Time Elapsed FEET Drawdown
Time
' 05/11/92 15: 51: 52 -2 . 5056 6. 237 0
05/11/92 15: 51: 53 -0 . 9504 6. 237 0
05/11/92 15: 51: 54 0 5. 9944 0.2426
05/11/92 15: 51: 55 1. 0368 5. 1513 1.0857
' 05/11/92 15: 51: 56 1.9872 5. 5555 0. 6815
05/11/92 15: 51: 58 3 . 3696 5. 8327 0.4043
05/11/92 15 : 51: 58 3 . 9744 5.9251 0.3119
' 05/11/92 15 : 51: 59 5. 0112 6. 0175 0.2195
05/11/92 15 : 52 : 00 6 . 048 6. 0868 0. 1502
05/11/92 15: 52 : 01 6. 9984 6. 1446 0. 0924
05/11/92 15: 52 : 02 8 . 0352 6. 1792 0. 0578
05/11/92 15: 52 : 03 8 . 9856 6. 2023 0. 0347
05/11/92 15: 52 : 04 10. 0224 6. 2139 0.0231
05/11/92 15: 52 : 05 10.9728 6. 2254 0. 0116
05/11/92 15: 52 : 06 12 . 0096 6. 237 0
' 05/11/92 15 : 52 : 08 13 . 392 6. 237 0
05/11/92 15 : 52 : 08 13 . 9968 6 .237 0
05/11/92 15: 52 : 09 15 . 0336 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 10 15 . 984 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 11 17 . 0208 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 12 17 . 9712 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 13 19 . 008 6 . 2485 -0.0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 14 20 . 0448 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 15 20. 9952 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 16 22 . 032 6.2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 18 23 . 4144 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 52 : 18 24 . 0192 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 52 : 19 24 .9696 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 52 : 20 26. 0064 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 52 : 21 27 . 0432 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 22 27 . 9936 6 . 2485 -0. 0115
592
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 23 29 . 0304 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 24 29 . 9808 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 52 : 25 31. 0176 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 26 32 . 0544 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 28 33 . 4368 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 28 34 . 0416 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 29 34 . 992 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 30 36. 0288 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 31 36.9792 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 32 38 . 016 6. 2485 -0.0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52: 33 39. 0528 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 34 40 . 0032 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15 : 52 : 35 41. 04 6.2485 -0.0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 36 41.9904 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15:52 # 38 43 . 3728 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 38 43 . 9776 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 39 45. 0144 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 40 46. 0512 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 41 47 . 0016 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 42 48 . 0384 6. 2601 -0.0231
05/11/92 15: 52 : 43 48. 9888 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 44 50. 0256 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 45 50.976 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 46 52 . 0128 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 48 53 . 3952 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 48 54 6.2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 52 : 49 55. 0368 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 50 55. 9872 6. 2485 -0.0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 51 57 . 024 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 52 57 . 9744 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 53 59 . 0112 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 54 60. 048 6 . 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 52 : 55 60 . 9984 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 56 62 . 0352 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 58 63 . 4176 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 52 : 58 64 . 0224 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 52 : 59 64 . 9728 6. 2601 -0.0231
05/11/92 15: 53 : 00 66. 0096 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 01 67 . 0464 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 02 67 . 9968 6 . 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 53 : 03 69 . 0336 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 04 69 .984 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15:53 : 05 71. 0208 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 53 : 06 71. 9712 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 08 73 .44 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 08 74 . 0448 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 53 : 09 74 . 9952 6. 2485 --0.0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 10 76. 032 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 11 76. 9824 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 12 78 . 0192 6. 2601 -•0. 0231
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 : 13 78 . 9696 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 14 80. 0064 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 15 81. 0432 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 16 81. 9936 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 18 83 . 376 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 18 83 . 9808 6. 2485 -0.0115
r 593
1
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 : 19 85 .0176 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 20 86.0544 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 :21 87 .0048 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 :22 88.0416 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 23 88 .992 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 53 :24 90.0288 6. 2601 -0. 0231
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 :25 90.9792 6. 2485 -0. 0115 e
05/11/92 15 : 53 :26 92 . 016 6. 2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :28 93 .3984 6.2485 --0.0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :28 94 .0032 6.2485 -0.0115
t05/11/92 15: 53 :29 95. 04 6.2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 30 95.9904 6.2485 -0.0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :31 97 .0272 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 53 :32 97 .9776 6.2485 0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :33 99 .0144 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :34 100.0512 6.2485 0.0115
05/11/92 15: 53 :35 101.0016 6.2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 :36 102 .0384 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 :38 103 .4208 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :38 104.0256 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :39 104 .976 6.2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 :40 106.0128 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :41 107 .0496 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15:53 :42 108 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :43 109.0368 6.2601 -0. 0231
' 05/11/92 15 : 53 : 44 109 .9872 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :45 111 . 024 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 :46 111.9744 6.2601 -0. 0231
' 05/11/92 15: 53 : 48 113 . 4432 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15 : 53 :48 114 . 048 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15 : 53 : 49 114 .9984 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 53 : 50 116.0352 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 53 : 51 116.9856 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 53 : 52 118.1088 6. 2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 54 : 07 132 . 9696 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 54 : 22 148. 0032 6. 2485 -0. 0115
' 05/11/92 15: 54 : 37 163 .0368 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15 : 54 : 52 177 . 984 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 55 : 07 193 . 0176 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 55 : 22 208 . 0512 6.2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 55: 37 222 . 9984 6.2485 -0. 0115
05/11/92 15: 55: 52 238. 032 6. 2601 --0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 56: 07 252 . 9792 6. 2601 --0. 0231
' 05/11/92 15: 56: 22 268 . 0128 6.2601 -0.0231
05/11/92 15: 56: 37 283 . 0464 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 56: 52 297 .9936 6.2601 --0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 57 : 07 313 .0272 6. 2601 -0.0231
' 05/11/92 15: 57 : 22 327 . 9744 6.2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 57: 37 343 . 008 6. 2601 -0.0231
05/11/92 15: 57 : 52 358.0416 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 58: 07 372 . 9888 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 58: 22 388 .0224 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 58: 37 402 .9696 6. 2601 --0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 58: 52 418 .0032 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15 : 59 : 07 433 .0368 6. 2601 -0. 0231
05/11/92 15: 59: 22 447 .984 6. 2601 -0. 0231
594
1
1
1
APPENDIX E
WELL LOGS
1
595
' WELL LOG
PAGE 1 OF 5
' COMPANY_MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANCE FACILITY WELL NO. MW-
PROJECT NO. ME1-619 DATE COMPLETED
' LOCATION 100 KEY_HEIGHTS DRIVE GEOLOGIST . . 151DRO DUQUE
_TAVERNIER KEY. FLORIDA
' DRILLING CO. LAIDLAW_ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIQES, INC.
1
GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
0' - 3' FILL:
' CONSISTING OF MINUTE
CRUSHED LIME ROCK
t3' - 10' LIMESTONE: LIGHT GREY, HARD,
WITH SECTIONS OF CRYSTALLIZED
' CALCITE.
10' - 17' LIMESTONE: LIGHT GREY, HARD TO
' VERY HARD, WITH SECTIONS OF
CRYSTALLIZED CALCITE, CONTAINING
CALCAREOUS AND QUARTZ SANDS AND
' PRESENCE OF MARINE SHELL FOSSILS.
1
1
596
WELL LOG
PAGE 2OF5
' COMPANY MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANQE FACILITY WELL NO. MW-9
PROJECT NO. ME1-619 DATE COMPLETED
LOCATION 186 KEY HEI HTS DRIVE GEOLOGIST I IDRO DUQUE
TAVERNIER KEY FL RI A
DRILLING CO. LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.
GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
D' - 2' FILL:
CONSISTING OF
' CRUSHED LIME ROCK
' 2' - 8' LIMESTONE: CREAM, MODERATELY HARD
TO HARD, POROUS WITH INCLUSIONS
OF FINE TO MEDIUM CALCAREOUS AND
' QUARTZ SANDS.
8' - 17' LIMESTONE: CREAM, HARD, IMBEDDED
' WITH QUARTZSAND. QUARTZSAND: CRYSTALLINE,
SUBROUNDED, POORLY SELECTED.
1
1
597
' WELL LOG
PAGE 3OF5
COMPANY MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANC9 FACILITY WELL NO. MW-10 -
' PROJECT NO. ME1-619 DATE COMPLETED
LOCATION 180 KEY HEIGHTS DRIVE _ _ GEOLOGIST ISID_RO DUQUE .
- TAVERNIER KEY,_FLQRIDA -
' DRILLING CO. _ LAIDLAW ENVI RON MgNTAL-SEAVLCES, INC.
' GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
' 0' - 7' FI LL:
LIMESTONE: GREY, VERY HARD WITH
' STREAKS OR LAYERS OF CRYSTALLIZED
CALCITE.
7' - 17' LIMESTONE: GREY, HARD, INTERBEDDED
WITH CALCAREOUS AND QUARTZ SANDS
AND INCLUSIONS OF MARINE SHELL FOSSILS.
1
598
WELL LOG
PAGE 4 OF 5
1
COMPANY MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANCE FACILITY WELL NO. MW-11 D
' PROJECT NO. ME1-619 DATE COMPLETED
' LOCATION 186 KEY HEIGHTS DRIVE GEOLOGIST ISIDRO DUQUE
TAVERNIER KEY, FLORIDA
' DRILLING CO. . LAIDLAW_ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
' GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
' 0' - 5' FILL:
CONSISTING OF CRUSHED LIME ROCK
' AND QUARTZSAND.
5' - 32' LIMESTONE: LIGHT GREY, HARD TO VERY
' HARD, SECTIONS OF CRYSTALLIZED CALCITE.
INCLUSIONS OF MARINE SHELL FOSSILS,
AND CALCAREOUS/QUARTZ SANDS.
QUARTZSAND: CRYSTALLINE, MEDIUM,
SUBANGULAR, POORLY SELECTED.
1
1
- 599
' WELL LOG
PAGE 5OF5
COMPANY_MONROE COUNTY MAINTENANCE FACILITY _ WELL NO. MW-12D
' PROJECT NO. ME1-619 DATE COMPLETED
' LOCATION _1$6 KEY HEIGHTS DRI]/E GEOLOGIST . . I$IDRO DUQUE
TAVERNIER KEY, FLORIDA
' DRILLING CO. LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI E
' GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
' 0' - 5' FI LL:
CONSISTING OF CRUSHED LIME ROCK
AND QUARTZSAND.
5' - 32' LIMESTONE: LIGHT GREY, HARD TO VERY
' HARD, SECTIONS OF CRYSTALLIZED CALCITE.
INCLUSIONS OF MARINE SHELL FOSSILS,
AND CALCAREOUS/QUARTZ SANDS.
' QUARTZSAND: CRYSTALLINE, MEDIUM,
SUBANGULAR, POORLY SELECTED.
1
600