The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem C14 935 936 Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Impact Fee Expenditure Request Section 1 - To be completed by requesting department Requestor:___Judy Clarke_______________ Title:__Director of Engineering Services_ Date: _09/15/2025____ Facility type:__Shared Use Path___________ Project name __Crane Blvd Shared Use Path Design and Permitting_ Total Project Cost (capital only) $484,373 Î design; $1,816,000 construction estimate_______________________ Description of project:Design and construct shared use path on Crane Blvd. Sugarloaf Impact fee district:__District 1________________ Boundaries of Service Area:_Upper Sugarloaf Key___________ Boundaries within projectÓs fee district: Yes _X_ No Type of project: Capital _X_ Operational __ Maintenance __ Project start date:_4/2024____ Useful life of project: 25(est)yrs_ (Must exceed 5 years to qualify as capital project) Project serves: Developmentthat existed in 1986 _X_ started after 1986 ___ projected beyond current year _X_ Would project have been needed to maintain level of service standards if no growth had occurred since 1986: Yes. Project is design and construction of new shared use path on Crane Blvd. to connect residential neighborhoods to the north to Sugarloaf School and adjacent neighborhoods. Section 2 - Planning reviewew Sr. Director, Planning and Environmental Resources Devin Tolpin 9/19/202 Reviewer:_______________________________ Title:______________________________ Date: __________________ Project eligible for impact fee funding: Yes __ No __ Fund: District:Partial Funding $:Full Funding $: County-Wide Municipality District 1 amount (Lower Keys) $45,419 District 2 amount (Middle Keys) District 3 amount (Upper Keys) Notes: A comparison of the functional population between 1992 (98,963) (adoption of impact fees ordinance) and projections for 2030 (162,355) (2030 is scope of our current Comp _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Plan), shows an increase of 63,392 over that time period, which is 39.0% of the 2030 functional population projection; up to that percentage of construction can be funded ___________________________________________________________________________________________ by the transportaton impact fees based on relevant County ordinances. The proposed funding is 2.501% of the construction cost of the project. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Section 3 - Legal review Ejhjubmmz!tjhofe!cz!Qfufs!I/!Npssjt! EO;!do>Qfufs!I/!Npssjt-!p>Npospf! Qfufs!I/! Dpvouz!CPDD-!pv>Npospf!Dpvouz! Buupsofz(t!Pggjdf-!fnbjm>Npssjt. QfufsANpospfDpvouz.GM/hpw-!d>VT! Npssjt Ebuf;!3136/1:/36!28;19;16!.15(11( 9/25/25 Peter Morris Assistant County Attorney Reviewer:_______________________________ Title:______________________________ Date: _____________ Yes Concur with planning review ___ Object to planning review ___ Notes: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Section 4 - OMB review John QuinnAssistant Director09/26/2025 Reviewer:_______________________________ Title:______________________________ Date: _____________ X XX Funds available: Yes __ No __ Transfer request prepared: Yes __ No __ Resolution prepared: Yes __ No __ CC_29021 X10/15/2025 Agenda summary prepared? Yes __ No __ Project code:___________Date of BOCC action: ________________ OMB Form Revised 7/28/98 937