06/07/1989 Special
PP 085
Public Hearing/Special Meeting
Board of County Commissioners
Wednesday, June 7, 1989
Key Colony Beach
A Special Meeting/Public Hearing of the Monroe
County Board of County Commissioners convened at 9:00 a.m.
on the above date at the City Hall in Key Colony Beach.
Present and answering to roll call were Commissioner
Wilhelmina Harvey, Commissioner Douglas Jones, Commissioner
John Stormont, and Mayor Michael Puto. Commissioner Eugene
Lytton arrived for the afternoon session. Also present were
Danny L. Kolhage, Clerk1 Garth Coller, Assistant County
Attorney 1 Donald Craig, Director - Growth Management
Division1 members of the County Planning Staff1 members of
the Press and Radi01 and the general public.
Garth Coller, Assistant County Attorney, addressed
the Board concerning procedures and the provisions of the
law concerning those who wished to produce a record for
possible appeal.
Donald Craig, Division Director/Growth Management,
addressed the Board concerning the process to be followed in
the Amendment Hearings.
Mr. Craig addressed the Board and advised that
Agenda Item 3 - a proposed Resolution confirming the
Administrative Boundary Interpretation of the Planning
Director in Land Use District Map Boundary Interpretation
Number 36 - would be postponed to June 27th.
The Board entered into a discussion concerning
Land Use District Map Boundary Interpretation Number 30.
Mr. Craig and David Paul Horan, representing Mr. and Mrs.
Laurence Barker, addressed the Board. Motion was made by
Commissioner Stormont and seconded by Commissioner Harvev to
adopt the following Resolution overturning the Administrative
Boundary Interpretation of the Planning Director in Land
Use District Map Boundary Interpretation Number 30, part of
the South ~ of Lot 6, Summerland Estates, Summerland Key,
based on the following findings:
A. that it meets the purpose of IS
Subdivision as stated in Sec. 9.5-2131
B. that it meets the definition of Lot
under Sec. L-lO 9.5-4 of the Code1 and
C. that it is illustrated as being a
drafting error by virtue of the platting
dates of the surrounding area and similar
errors by definition in the immediate and
adjacent vicinitY1 and
further, that a determination will have
no adverse effect on the value of
surrounding lots due to the improved but
undeveloped nature of those surrounding
lots and that the determination is
consistent with the provisions of the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
PP 086
Roll call vote was unanimous with Commissioner Lytton not
present.
RESOLUTION NO. 348-1989
See Res. Book No. 79 which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Fred Tittle, representing John E. Carter, addressed
the Board concerning the proposed Resolution confirming the
Administrative Boundary Interpretation of the Planning
Director in Land Use District Map Boundary Interpretation
Number 34, Lime Grove Estates, Part of Tract 2. Motion was
made by Commissioner Harvey to approve due to inherent
errors in mapping. During discussion, the motion was
withdrawn. Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and
seconded by Commissioner Puto to deny based upon the deter-
mination that the request does not meet the criteria
established for Boundary Determinations. Roll call vote was
taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Motion carried with Commissioner Lytton not present. Motion
was then made by Commissioner Jones and seconded by
Commissioner Harvey directing Staff to investigate and pro-
cess a rezoning of the entire area to IS or other
appropriate zoning with all the necessary notices to the
surrounding property owners and also directing Staff to con-
sider alternative means of amending the Land Development
Regulations to apply designations in a new formula to allow
building single-family houses on each lot without the
requirements of TOR's. Dagny Johnson addressed the Board.
Motion carried unanimously with Commissioner Lytton not pre-
sent.
The Board entered into a discussion concerning the
proposed Resolution confirming the Administrative Boundary
Interpretation of the Planning Director in Land Use District
Map Boundary Interpretation No. 39, Ramrod Key, RE
*11401-00101 and 11404-00102. Motion was made by
-Commissioner Stormont and seconded by Commissioner Harvey to
deny and recommend that Staff process a rezoning of the
area. Roll call vote was taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Motion carried with Commissioner Lytton not present.
The Board recessed for lunch.
*
*
*
*
*
The Board reconvened with all Commissioners pre-
sent.
Commissioner Lytton asked for a Point of Personal
Privilege and discussed the pending Rule before the
Department of Community Affairs concerning Destination
Resorts and other matters. Maria Abadal of DCA addressed
the Board.
PP 087
Motion was made by Commissioner Lytton and, seconded
by Commissioner Stormont to table all items scheduled to be
considered on this day in deference to the DCA's ruie-making
process now underway. Maria Abadal and Fred Tittle
addressed the Board. Roll call vote was taken with the
following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Lytton
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Motion failed.
Lloyd Good addressed the Board and objected to the
Hearing on procedural grounds, due to insufficient notice,
and the provisions of 125.66 and also due to the lack of
substantive reasons for the considered changes. Fred Tittle
also addressed the Board on this matter.
PD lOA Amending Section 9.5-4 (D-3), Monroe County Code,
in order to provide for a definition of Destination Resort
(continued from previous hearings).
*1 The Board considered the following definition:
"Destination Resort means a planned
development containing one or more
hotels of at least 100 rooms as
principal use with accessory uses
that provide on-site recreational,
commercial and entertainment oppor-
tunities of a magnitude sufficient
to attract visitors and tourists."
Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and seconded by
Mayor Puto to deny the foregoing proposed amendment. Roll
call vote was taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Lytton
Commissioner stormont
Mayor Puto
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Motion carried.
~ The Board then considered the following definition:
"Destination Resort means a planned
development containing one (1) or more
hotels under single ownership or
management as a principal use with
accessory uses that provide on-site
recreational, commercial and/or
entertainment opportunities. In
Destination Resort land use districts
(DR), transient occupancy only is
intended to be accommodated, with
amenities. In Destination Resort
overlay areas (DR-I), transient and
permanent residential dwellings are
intended to be accommodated, with
amenities, but only within multiple
land use districts overlayed with
the designation."
PP 0 8 8
Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and seconded by
Commissioner Puto to adopt the foregoing proposed amendment.
Roll call vote was taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Lytton
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
Motion failed for lack of a four-fifths.
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
11 The Board then considered the following definition:
"Resort means a planned development
containing one (1) or more hotels
under single ownership or management
as a principal use with accessory
uses that provide on-site recrea-
tional, commercial and/or entertain-
ment opportunities. In Resort land
use districts (RE) transient
occupancy only is intended to be
accommodated except for required
employee housing."
Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and seconded by
Commissioner Jones to adopt this third version of PD lOA.
Roll call vote was taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Lytton
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
No
No
No
Yes
No
Motion failed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and
seconded by Commissioner Lytton to table the remaining pro-
posed amendments concerning Destination Resorts as adver-
tised today - PD 14, PD l8A, PD l8B, PD 20, PD 21, PD 63,
PD 7lA and PD 109. Roll call vote was unanimous.
Motion was made by Commissioner Stormont and
seconded by Commissioner Lytton to adopt the following
Resolution modifying Resolution No. 688-l988*which was in
support of the previous DCA Rule and to now remove the
approval of the DR portion.
RESOLUTION NO. 349-1989
See Res. Book No. 79 which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Roll call vote was taken with the following results:
Commissioner Harvey
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Lytton
Commissioner Stormont
Mayor Puto
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Motion carried.
There being no further business, the meeting was
adjourned.
*
*
*
*
*
'0
Q) .
.~o
4-lZ
.~
'Os::
00
13>M
.....
CIl;::l ..... .
CIlr-l mOO
~o s::
CIl ......~
!-lQ) s::.....
Q)P:: OQ)
~Q) 13Q)
!-l13
;::l,.c 0
Z .....u
0 CI.lU
s::..... P=l
0 .
.~'O ""0'\
.....Q) 00
;::l..... :>-.0'\
r-leJ ,.c....-t
OQ)
CIl!-l 00 "
Q)!-l oor--
P::o O'\N
eJ ....-t
CIl I Q)
.~'O oos::
.cS:: \O;::l
HCIl \0""
ok
I