Resolution 670-1988
Planning Director
RESOLUTION NO. 670_1988
A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ADMINISTRATIVE
BOUNDARY INTERPRETATION OF THE PLANNING
DIRECTOR IN LAND USE DISTRICT MAP BOUNDARY
INTERPRETATION NUMBER 17 ,Crains Sub. ,Bl 41, Lts 1 and 16,Grassy Key
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
The administrative decision of the Planning Director in Land
Use District Map Boundary Interpretation Number
17
dated
November 16, 1988
attached and incorporated by reference, is
hereby acknowledged, found to be in conformance with the
standards set forth in Sec. 9.5-3 (m), Monroe County Code, and
approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the
6
day of December
, A.D., 1988.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By d~~
Mayor/Cha1rman
(SEAL)
-0
"'"
.."
-
r-
f""l
o
."
c:>
;;0
:-.0
1"f1
~.,
<::)
:::0
o
Attest:
3: 0
~ :x>
:::0 Z
o()z
.....r "
, . ';:l[: ".
C") , r--
or,:
c-----'"
:z: ::n ;-
2 (=;;-
r" ,.
)''7:10
Ii
lij
-I2L /!~ M
-
'iO
..
-
\IJ
~\r,,/jR() i/Er.J /..15' TO FCJi1,'"':'.
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY.
8
RW / j h
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Donald L. Craig, AICP, Assoc. AlA Assistant County
Administrator for Growth Management Division
Department: Planninq
by: Jeanne DuBois
SUBJECT: Boundary Determination for Crain's Subdivision, Block
41, Lots 1 and 16, Grassy Key, Monroe County, Florida
MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988
Previous Relevant Board Action: / / ( ) Referral: Yes____No____
Commissioners District
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Native Area boundary be
moved to the south boundary of Lot 16 and 1, thus including all of both
Lot 16 and Lot 1 in the Improved Subdivision (IS) land use district.
Summary of RequestjReport On the current land use di strict map, the
boundary between IS and NA runs through Lot 1. Lot 16 is shown as being
in the Native Area land use district. The property is located entirely
within an upland area of tropical hardwood hammock.
Action by:___Ordinance ~Resolution
Citizens Committee Statement ___Yes~No____ Attached
Aqreement/Contract - No. N/A
Approved by County Attorney as to Legality___Yes___N.A.
_Standard Form
Approved by Risk Management___Yes___Not Applicable
Approved by Office Fiscal Management
Funding Source
N/A
CUrrent Year Cost
Annual Cost
Budqeted___Yes___No
Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel?
-1LNo
If Yes State Number
Permanent___ Temporary___ Other
Board Policy(ies) Applicable
t
Planning Commission Action Taken____Yes
Date____N.A.
Alternatives: Include Lot 1 in the IS and not Lot 16. This would be
inconsistent, however, with the intent of the NA to protect wetlands as
there are no wetlands on the subject property.
Attached Documentation~Yes___No
t
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 16, 1988
TO:
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Donald Craig
RE:
Boundary Determination for Crain's Subdivision
Block 41, Lots 1 and 16
Backqround:
On the current land use district map, the boundary between IS
and NA runs through Lot 1. Lot 16 is shown as being in the
Native Area land use district.
Recommendation:
It is, recommended that the Native Area district boundary be
moved to the south boundary of Lot 16 and 1, thus including all
of both Lot 16 and Lot 1 in the Improved Subdivision land use
district.
Alternatives:
Include Lot 1 in the IS, which is mostly in the Improved
Subdivision land use district on the current map, and not Lot 16,
which is all Native Area on the current map. This would be
inconsistent, however, with the intent to protect wetlands as
there are no wetlands on the subject property.
Findings of Fact:
1. The designation of the above property as Improved Subdivision
(IS) rather than Native Area (NA) will be consistent with Section
9.5-213, Purpose of the Improved Subdivision District, and the
uses allowed within the district, Section 9.5-242.
2. The determination was based on the following relevant data:
The zoning maps in exi stence before the Land Use Plan
show both lots as RU-1.
The adjacent platted road to the south, Ferrera Street,
is an existing paved road.
The property is located entirely wi thin an upland area
of tropical hardwood hammock habitat.
,
.
t
The intent of the NA district was to preserve the
existing mangrove and transitional wetlands south of
this site. The NAilS boundary line is intended to
follow the existing wetland/upland line.
3. Analysis of the existing uses on the property and surrounding
properties indicate that the essential neighborhood
characteristics support the determination to designate these two
lots as IS.
Attachments:
1. Application
2. Staff Reports from Environmental Resources Division
3. Current Land Use District Map
4. Aerial Photo
5. Zoning pre-1986
6. Land Use District Map effective Sept. 15, 1986 (Pattison)
7. Proposed boundary change
,4
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE DISTRICT MAP DETERMINATION
Dennis Kellner
115 Stirrup Key Woods Rd.
Marathon, FL 33050
KEY Grassy MM 58
OCEANSIDE OR BAYS IDE? Bayside
SUBDIVISION Crain's Subdivision
PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 51
BLOCK 41 LOT(S) 1, 16
MISC. LOCATION INFORMATION <ATTACH EXTRA SHEET IF NECESSARY)
APPLICANT
ADDRESS
PHONE #305-743-4295
REQUEST CHANGE FROM IS/NA TO IS
REASON FOR REQUEST: Lot 16 surrounded by IS lots and roads,
Lot 1 has both NA and IS on one lot.
PRESENT LAND USE: Vacant
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING REQUEST:
SIGNATURE
DATE
,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Date:
September 13, 1988
Re
George Garrett, Coordinator, Environmental Resources Div.
Pat McNeese, Biologist, Environmental Resources Div. f7~
Lot 16, Block 41, Crains Subdv.i Kellner--application
for boundary determination
To
From:
INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesting a boundary determination for the
referenced property on Grassy Key. The property is presently
shown on the land use district maps to be entirely within the
Native Area (NA) district. The adjacent district to the north is
Improved Subdivision. The NA/IS line on this block presently
runs through Lots 15 and 1, located north and east, respectively,
of the subject lot. A boundary determination for Lot 1 has been
reviewed by this division and is currently being processed fur-
ther. The recommendation of the biologist was that the Improved
Subdivision district should include Lot 1 entirely.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The property is located entirely within an upland area of tropi-
cal hardwood hammock habitat. The adj acent platted road to the
south, Ferrera Street, is an existing paved road. The adjacent
platted road to the west, Avocado Avenue, has never been cleared
or constructed.
EVALUATION
It is felt that the intent of the NA district was to preserve the
existing mangrove and transitional wetlands south of this site.
Therefore, it appears that the NA/IS line is intended to follow
the existing wetland/upland line with IS encompassing the entire
upland area. Since Lot 16 ie located entirely within the up-
lands, it would be included in the IS district based upon the
assumed intent.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the referenced property was intended to be
included within the Improved Subdivision land use district.
J
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Date:
October 12, 1988
To
George Garrett, Coordinator, Environmental Resources
Dept. \ Ol~
Pat McNeese, Biologist, Environmental Resources DePt.J?~ 1 ,
Lot 1, Block 41, Crains Subdv.; Kellner--app1ication
for boundary determination
From:
Re
-----------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
The referenced property is located within two land use districts
on the official land use district maps: Improved Subdivision (IS)
and Native Area (NA). The applicant requests a determination of
whether this property actually does fall within two districts.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The property is located
ner of Ferriere Street,
road under construction.
upland area with tropical
within a platted subdivision on the cor-
an existing road, and Lemon Avenue, a
This lot is located entirely within an
hardwood hammock vegetation.
EVALUATION
It appears from examining the land use district maps that the
intent of the NA/IS line is to follow the wetland/upland line on
site. This is apparant because the entire upland area is includ-
ed wi thin the IS district whether there are existing roads or
not. Since this particular lot falls entirely within uplands, it
would appear that it was intended to be included entirely within
the IS district.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that this property be considered to be entirely
within the Improved Subdivision land use district.
cc: Ty Symroski
Jeanne DuBois
!.;$
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
/
/
.c;
/ '\
/ '\
< '\
,'\ '\
, ,
, ,
" '\
",,'I.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'\
,
....
,',
" ,
, "
, ,
'\ ,
, ,
, ,
, '
, ,
, ,
, " ,
.... ,
, 'I." '\
, , ,
,"'I. ,
. ' ,
, ....
,
....
,
'\
....
....
,
....
,
....
,
.... ....
.... it
,
. '
,
,
,
N
Land Use District Maps
Monroe County, Florida
Ja.....ary 19,1988
Panel or Sheet# ;z/!:
Appllc ant: J)PrJni >' !!elIne,
Key: ~I!A~~'( .ef-l'
G,-'-'"
~
eYI LI J../b
Flle:# CeJ4,:v.:. ~-$~(/)j/4Ai _
1"- 200' I
Mile Marker: 5J
":j~..--,;_.~;~\'
~'"
~ '-,' - .1-~~:~_
N
I 1-.100' f
Panel or Sheet# C,b
AppUc.nt: Dt.-?JMS 1:.C-UN6e
Key: (,etK~ 'r" ICty
&'fI,L/J,-/C:,
File # C.eH/NS S(/~f)/vISI.l".)
Mile "'r.r: ,<;x
--------
. -
/
Monroe County Zoning Maps
Pre-September 15,1986
~'
//
/'
/'
~
V
N
I 1": ZOO' i
Panel or Sheet#: 232-;;H,:!-
Appll cant: f)bJ/,g ~€t.t.;Joe
Key: GR~S~ Y Iret{
,$ 'II) L I, ...1'"
File #: (1!-~/,v'S r,;8PlvtS'I*-'" --
Mile Marker: s-f
r
I
/ ~'.')
h~~'/ ,~ ~< - ~
// C>' ' /r '\,/
/) // \
/ ,/ J-
/ /// I
/.( ~J ^>/ I
/ - ~- // I
(. ,-:-v ,/
/ ,I/: (
'" /" ,
" 'f' /35 ' / \
~, / (~ / ,." 1
.' )~~\"/ / 'r// rS<,..'
'"--~. /, /\/
- ~/ . / "'/ . \
/' --:-y-, ,,). /
// k' /-_.,.~'- - -\ ../ /><:
./ / "" -''--- I ./ / \
/r , "" " \. ,//
:// / _ ", //><'" '\ \ ") //
/ ~ ) ,) '-""c' .
/ \ "{"
'- ~/ /
~\ \l
~~V~\
l x
/
I
/
L-
,NA
N
,
,.. '
\.
,/
'" //
" ,/'
,,-\...~..\ ,/
,.,., ,/
.~ /'
, ,A,
" .. / .
~. ,/'/.
I ,,/
.;
Land Use District Maps
Monroe County, Florida
Approved by B.O.C.C., February 28,1986
'l { 6 'f I L I J L lib
Panel or Sheet# joL c .;2/ Flle:# ~h_$'~~p"ny",,j
App II cant: Dr/7n ;5 K'aL/1lf:-ze
Key: (4,Mslf Kh/
,
~' .
+-
s...J...
~C:J
0~
@
I 1"2600' I
Mile Marker: S'f
",J
"'\
....
....,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,.
,.
,.
/
./
,.
'"
,. ,
./ ,
,. ,
// ,
.,0(
,. "
,. ,
< ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
'"
,
,
"
"
"
,
,
,
...
.... "
,
,
,
,
,
"-
,
.... ....,
...' ,
, ,
, "
, "
, '
, '
" '
, '
, '
" ~ ,
, ,
, ,..,
" " "
,'" ,
. " ,
" ,
"
,
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
~
"
,
,
,
. '
,
,
,
Pur.uant to Section 9.5-24(a)(2)(h) of the Monro. County Cod.,
the boundarl.. of the land u.e DI.trlct Map are Interpreted to be
located a. Indicated above and briefly described aa: fvbvP- the IS/NA
'hom",riry tn inr'lllnp Tn+~ 1 rinn lh in +111" TS oistrict as shown.
N
~
Director, Growth Management
Sheet # 215 Key GrAssy
Date
BOCC Re.olutlon
1"=200'