Resolution 183-1987
Charles P. Aguero, Manager
Municipal Service District
RESOLUTION NO. 183-1987
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CHAIR}1AN OF THE BOARD
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN MONROE
COUNTY AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C. FOR SOLID WASTE
FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN STUDY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that said Board hereby approves and
authorizes the Mayor and Chairman of the Board to execute an
Agreement by and between Monroe County and Hazen and Sawyer,
P. C., a copy of same being attached hereto and made a part
hereof, for solid waste feasibility and design study.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the 21st day of April, A.D. 1987.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
(SEAL)
/}
Attest:
.~
4L~~.~t'-
-- ..~----
-
_...-.._'''_'.;......^.''''....,,;,..,............._._'''''_____._.~.....,..''''....__,~......._.>''_.;_^_...__w~.~...;~._......'O"__;O.'.__
'---'->-. ,
......
AGREEMENT
Between
MONROE COUNTY
And
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
For
SOLID WASTE FEASIBILITY
and
DESIGN STUDY
APRIL 10, 1987
\.
.;:.
AGREEMENT
Between
MONROE COUNTY
And
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
For
SOLID WASTE FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN STUDY
This is an Agreement between: MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and
assigns, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, through its Board
of County Commissioners.
AND
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C., a New York professional
corporation registered to operate in the State of Florida, its
successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as ENGINEER.
WIT N E SSE T H, in consideration of the mutual terms
and conditions, promises, covenants and payments hereinafter
set forth, COUNTY and ENGINEER agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS
For the purposes of this Agreement and the various
covenants, conditions, terms and provisions which follow, the
DEFINITIONS and IDENTIFICATIONS set forth below are assumed to
be true and correct and are agreed upon by the parties.
1.1 COUNTY: MONROE COUNTY, a body corporate and
politic and political subdivision of the State of
Florida. References to "Municipal Service District"
and to "Di st rict" shall be const rued to mean COUNTY
except when such references relate to matters of
administration of this contract.
1.2 ENGINEER: HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C., the pro-
fessional organization with whom COUNTY has con-
tracted to perform the services pursuant to this
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-87
-1-
Agreement. KAISER ENGINEERS will act as subcontractor
to HAZEN AND SAWYER, ENGINEERS.
1.3 COMMISSION: The Board of County Commissioners of
MONROE COUNTY, Florida, which is the governing body
of the MONROE COUNTY, Municipal Service District.
1.4 ADMINISTRATOR: Whenever the term ADMINISTRATOR is
used herein it is intended to mean Manager of the
MONROE COUNTY Municipal Service District, his
deputy, or his designee.
1.5 "REIMBURSABLES" or "REIMBURSABLE COST" is defined
as the nonsa1ary expenses directly attributable to the
work performed pursuant to this Agreement including as
costs for travel and subsistence, supplies, 10ng-
distance telephone, telegraph, use of computer,
reproduction costs, soil borings, laboratory work, and
fees for special consultants and surveyors authori zed
by the client, will be billed at actual cost plus
fifteen percent handling charge.
1.6 PROJECT: All professional engineering services
(including any necessary and incidental services) set
forth in Article 2 to be performed by ENGINEER
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
1. 7 DIRECT LABOR COST: The term d i rec t labor cost sha 11
mean the actual hourly rate paid by Engineer for
principals, engineers, draftsmen, clerks and word
processors. Direct labor cost is defined as the
annual salary divided by 2,080 hours. Said hourly
rates are to be only for time directly chargeable to
the Project. A detailed breakdown for these rates
shall be kept current by ENGINEER and readi ly
accessible to COUNTY. The hourly rates payable by
COUNTY for each employee's category shall not exceed
the amount shown on the attached Exhibit "A".
1.8 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR: Whenever the term Contract
Administrator is used herein, it is intended to mean
the Manager of MONROE COUNTY Municipal Service
District. In the administration of this contract, as
contracted with matters of policy, all parties may
rely upon instructions or determinations made by the
Contract Administrator.
1.9 NOTICE TO PROCEED: A written statement issued by
COUNTY directing ENGINEER to commence performance
of all or a portion of services required by the Scope
of Work.
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
-2-
ARTICLE 2
SCOPE OF WORI
The Scope of Work of this Agreement is contained in Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
3. I
ARTICLE 3
COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
pay the ENGINEER as compensation
be provided its direct labor cost
described in Article 1.7 and to
for expenses as described in
to maximum payments as set forth
COUNTY agrees t~
for the services to
to be computed as
reimburse ENGINEER
Article 1.5 subject
below.
(a) COUNTY agrees to pay ENGINEER as compensation
for performance under the terms of this
AGREEMENT for the scope of services set forth
in Phase 1 Assignment all allowable and
allocatable costs that are incurred in the
performance of this contract up to a cost ceiling
of $599,000. Labor cost will be billed at 2.85
direct salaries which covers fringe benefits,
overhead and profit. Reimbursable cost will be
bi lIed at actual cost plus fifteen percent
handling charge except for the subconsultants
listed under Exhibit C. On Exhibit D, the total
not-to-exceed total for the Phase I Assignment is
subdivided by Task. Costs to the COUNTY are
est imated by Task. Actual expenditures between
tasks may vary during the performance of the
contract. The $599,000 not-to-exceed total for
Phase I Ass ignment shall not be exceeded wi thout
formally amending the Contract.
(b) Other work which may be assigned to ENGINEER
and "not -to-exceed" cost cei ling mutually agreed
upon by COUNTY and ENGINEER under this
assignment is listed below.
o
Environmental permitting
requested by agencies
activities
o Design services for transfer stations,
sludge collection, processing or disposal
services, energy recovery facilities, sludge
or solid waste collection and processing
facilities and required solid waste
facilities requested by COUNTY.
Hwd:008IC/4-l0-87 -3-
~
o Land appraisal and acquisition services
o Boring, analytical, and survey work
o Landfill design services
o Siting, permitting and environmental
services including mitigation work
o Pre 1 iminary RFP for energy eff ic ient sol i d
waste systems
o Technical visits on behalf of COUNTY to
other solid facilities
o Representation of COUNTY including legal,
institutional or technical services with
respect to regional solid waste solutions
o Financial or rate studies of various solid
waste options
3.2 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT
(a) ENGINEER may submit monthly billings,
identified by the Task number, by the 5th day or
1 st working day thereafter of the month for the
previous calendar month, for all salary costs and
expenses attributable to the Project. All bills
rece i ved after said date wi 11 be proce ssed for
the following monthly bi lling period. These
billings shall identify the nature of the work
performed, the total hours of work performed and
the job classifica"tions of the individuals
performing same and under the Task numbers. Such
billings shall also itemize any reimbursable
expense. The statement shall show a summary of
di rect labor costs and expenses wi th an accrual
of the total amount billed and credits for
portions billed previOUSly. All items shall show
the proportion of the limitation that has been
expended through previous billings.
(b) ENGINEER acknowledges that each bill must be
approved by CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR before payment
can be made by COUNTY.
(c) COUNTY agrees that it wi 11 make its best
efforts to pay ENGINEER within forty-five (45)
calendar days of receipt of ENGINEER's
statement as provided for above. Ninety-five
percent (95%) of the total shown to be due on
each statement.
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
-4-
Upon ENGINEER's completion and COUNTY's
approval of each Task of the Project, COUNTY
shall remit to ENGINEER that five percent (5t)
portion of each bill previously withheld.
3.3 Payments will be made to ENGINEER at:
(d)
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
5950 Washington Street
Hollywood, Florida 33023
ARTICLE 4
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
"
,
Servi ce s whi ch are re lated to thi s Ag reement but which are
outside the Scope of Services for Phase I Assignment and are
set forth in Article 2 shall be additional services for which
ENGINEER must obtain the prior written approval of COUNTY
if compensation is to be paid. ENGINEER agrees that COUNTY
shall have the option to require ENGINEER to perform
additional services which are related to this Agreement, if
authorized by the Commission, and for any such additional
services COUNTY shall compensate ENGINEER in the same
manner and on the same basis as provided in Article 3, except
that, same shall not be subject to the not-to-exceed total
amount established in Article 3.1 (a). Except for additional
services performed by ENGINEER pursuant to Art icle 6.2, the
parties shall agree upon an additional scope of work in a
written contract equal in dignity to this Agreement before
performing such additional services.
ARTICLE 5
COST RECORDS
ENGINEER agrees to keep such records and accounts and to
require all of its professional associates, subcontractors or
subconsultants to keep records and accounts as may be necessary
in order to record complete and correct entries as to direct
labor costs and reimbursables directly chargeable to this
Project for which ENGINEER expects to be paid.
Such books and records wi 11 be ava i lable at a 11 reasonable
times for examination and audit by COUNTY, state and federal
auditors and shall be kept for a period of at least five (5)
years after complet ion of all work to be performed under thi s
Agreement. Incomplete or incorrect ent ries in such books and
records will be grounds for disallowance by COUNTY of any
fees or reimbursables based upon such entries.
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
-5-
ARTICLE 6
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
6.1 ENGINEER shall complete the services under each work
category referred to below within the following time
schedule s:
Task B-6
Task D-2
Task F
Source Separation
Landfill Si ting
Recommended Course
of Action
October 1987
October 1987
November 1987
In the
services
resulting
COUNTY 0 r
jurisdiction
Contractor,
ENGINEER,
extension of
event ENGINEER is unable to complete such
within the time provided due to delays
from untimely review and approval by
other governmental authori ties having
over the Project, or due to delays by the
and such delays are not the fault of
COUNTY shall grant a reasonable
time for completion of work.
6.2 COUNTY and ENGINEER may negotiate the time of
performance for additional tasks. If COUNTY and
ENGINEER cannot agree on a time of performance for
additional tasks, COUNTY shall have the right to
immediately terminate the negotiations and procure the
services from another person or firm.
ARTICLE 7
MISCELLANEOUS
7.1 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All sketches, tracings, drawings, computations,
details, design calculations and other documents and
plans that result from ENGINEER'S services under
this Agreement shall become the property of and shall
be deli vered to COUNTY wi thout restriction or
limitation as to use. COUNTY agrees that no
additions, deletions, changes or revisions shall be
made to such documents unless ENGINEER'S name and
professional seal are removed from such changed or
revised materials.
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
-6-
7.2 TERMINATION
Thi s Agreement may be terminated by either party for
cause upon thi rty (30) days wri tten notice or such
termination given by the terminating party to the
other party, in which event ENGINEER shall be paid
its compensation for services performed to the
termination date, including all reimbursable expenses
then due or incurred to such date of termination. All
finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and
reports prepared by ENGINEER shall become the
property of COUNTY and shall be delivered by
ENGINEER to COUNTY.
7.3 RECORn IEEPING
ENGINEER agrees to keep such records and accounts
and to require all of its professional associates,
subcont rac tors or subconsul t ant s to keep such records
and accounts as may be necessary in order to record
complete and correct entries as to personnel hours,
di rect labor costs and reimbursables which are
directly chargeable to this project and for which
ENGINEER expects to be paid. Such books and records
sha 11 be ava i lable at all reasonable time s for
examination and audit by COUNTY and shall be kept
f or a peri od of at least five (5) years af ter the
completion of all work to be performed pursuant to
thi s Agreement. Incomplete or incorrect ent ries in
such books and records will be grounds for
disallowance by COUNTY of any compensation based
thereon.
7.4 NO CONTINGENT FEES
ENGINEER warrants that it has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for ENGINEER, to solici t or
secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any person, company, corporation,
individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for ENGINEER, any fee, commission,
percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For the breach or violation of this
provision, COUNTY shall have the right, at its
discretion, to terminate the Agreement without
liability, to deduct from the contract price, or
otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, gift or consideration.
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
-7-
7.S ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement, or any interest herein, shall not
under any circumstances be assigned, transferred or
otherwise encumbered, by ENGINEER without the prior
written consent of COUNTY. However, the Agreement
shall run to the Monroe County government and its
successors.
7.6 INDEMNIFICATION
(a) ENGINEER shall indemnify COUNTY, its agents,
servants, employees and the Monroe County Board
of County Commissioners from and against any
claim, demand or cause of action of whatsoever
kind of nature arising out of error, omission or
negligent act of ENGINEER, its agents, servants
or employees in the performance of services under
this Agreement.
(b) Except as expressly set forth in subparagraph (a)
and (c) of this Paragraph, COUNTY shall
indemnify and hold ENGINEER and subcont ractors,
its directors, officers, and employees harmless
from and against any and all liabilities, losses,
damages, costs, and expenses (including, but not
limited to, fees and charges of attorneys and
court and arbitration costs) which ENGINEER,
its directors, officers, and employees may
hereafter suffer in connection with any claim,
action, or right of action (at law or in equity)
because of any injury (including death) or damage
to person or property which arises out of or is
in connection with the presence, discharge,
release or escape of contaminants of any kind.
(c) Anything in subparagraph (a) and (b) of this
Paragraph to the contrary notwithstanding,
COUNTY shall not be liable to the extent that
any liability, loss, damage, cost and expense
described in sub- paragraph (b) of this
Paragraph, results from an act of gross
negligence or willful misconduct by Consultant or
its directors, officers or employees.
7.7 INSURANCE
Without limiting any of the other obligations or
liabilities of ENGINEER, ENGINEER shall (at its
own expense) provide and maintain in force at all
times during the performance of services under thi s
Agreement such insurance, including Worker's
Compensation insurance, Employer'S Liability
insurance, Comprehensive General Liability insurance,
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
-8-
and Professional Liabi Ii ty insurance as wi 11 provide
and assure to COUNTY the full protection (without
loss of any kind) contained in the foregoing
indemnification undertaken by ENGINEER. The
Comprehensi ve General Li abi 1 i ty policy shall clearly
identify the foregoing indemnification as insured
under this section.
Such policy or policies shall be issued by United
States Treasury approved companies authorized to do
business in the State of Florida. ENGINEER shall
specifically protect COUNTY and the Honroe County
Board of County Commissioners by naming COUNTY and
said Board of County Commissioners as additional named
insureds under a Comprehensi ve General Liabi li ty
insurance policy as hereinafter described. The
Professional Liability policy or certificate shall
reference this Project by endorsement.
(a) Professional Liability Insurance with limits of
liability no less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) per occurrence to assure COUNTY
the full indemnification specified in Article
7.6(a). The policy shall require written notice
to COUNTY at least thirty (30) days prior to
cancellation or restriction of coverage. The
coverage shall be afforded on a form acceptable
to COUNTY. If such cove rage is provi ded on an
occurrence basis, coverage must be afforded until
all services to be performed under this Agreement
have been completed and accepted by COUNTY.
(b) Worker's Compensation insurance to apply for all
employees in compl iance wi th the "Workers'
Compensation Law" of the State of Florida and all
applicable federal laws. In addition, the
policy(ies) must include:
1. Employers Liability with minimum limits of
One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00)
each accident.
2. Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction --
The policy(ies) must be endorsed with a
requirement that COUNTY must be provided
with at least thirty (30) days written
notice of cancellation and/or restriction
before same takes effect.
(c) Comprehensive General Liability with minimum
limits of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($500,000.00) per occurrence combined single
limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
-9-
Damage Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a
form no more restrictive than the latest edition
of the Comprehensive General Liability Policy,
without restrictive endorsements, as filed by the
Insurance Services Office and must include:
1. Premises and/or Operations.
2. Independent Contractors.
3.
Explosion,
Coverages.
Collapse
and
Underground
4. Broad Form Property Damage.
5. Broad Form Contractual Coverage applicable
to this specific Agreement, including any
hold harmless and/or indemnification
agreement.
6. Personal Injury Coverage with minimum limits
of coverage equal to those required for
Bodily Injury Liability.
7. COUNTY is to be specifically included as
an Addi tional Insured for the liabi Ii ty of
COUNTY resulting from operations performed
by or on behalf of ENGINEER in performance
of this Agreement and for liability of
COUNTY for acts or omissions of COUNTY
in connect ion wi th the general supervi sion
of such operations. ENGINEER'S insurance
including that applicable to COUNTY as an
Addi tional Insured shall apply on a primary
basis and any other insurance maintained by
COUNTY shall be in excess of and shall not
contribute with ENGINEER'S insurance.
8. Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction --
The policy(ies) must be endorsed with a
requirement that COUNTY must be provided
with at least thirty (30) days written
notice of cancellation and/or restriction
before the same takes effect.
(d) Business Automobile Liability with minimum limits
of Three Hund red Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00)
per occurrence combined single limi t for Bodi ly
Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability.
Coverage must be afforded on a form no more
restrictive than the latest edition of the
Busi ne ss Automobile L i abi I i ty Policy, wi thout
restrictive endorsements, as filed by the
Insurance Services Offices and must include:
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
-10-
1. Owned vehicles.
2. Hired and non-owned vehicles.
(e) Prior to commencement of services, ENGINEER
shall provide to COUNTY Certificates of
Insurance evi denc ing the insurance cove rages
specified herein. The requi red Certificates of
Insurance shall not only name the types of
pol icy( ie s) provided, but al so sha 11 refe r
specifically to this Agreement and shall state
that such insurance is as required by this
Agreement. ENGINEER shall also provide to
COUNTY a certified copy of the professional
liability insurance coverage required herein. If
the initial insurance policy(ies) required by
thi s Agreement expi re pri or to the complet ion of
the services, renewal Certificates of Insurance
or policies shall be furnished thirty (30) days
prior to the date of their expiration.
7.8 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
ENGINEER agrees that it will not discriminate
against any employee or appl icant for employment for
work under this Agreement because of race, color,
religion, sex, age or national origin and will take
af f i rmat i ve step s to ensure that applicant s are
employed and employees are treated during employment
without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age or
national origin. This provision shall include, but
not be limited to, the following: employment,
upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment
advertising; layoff or termination; rates of payor
their forms of' compensation; and selection for
training, including apprenticeship.
7.9 ATTORNEY'S FEES
If COUNTY incurs any expense in enforcing the terms
of thi s Agreement due to nonperformance by ENGINEER
whether sui t be brought or not, ENGINEER agrees to
pay all such costs and expenses including but not
1 imi ted to court costs, interest, and reasonable
attorney's fees.
7.10 REPRESENTATIVE OF COUNTY AND ENGINEER
(a) It is recognized that questions in the day-to-day
conduct of the Project will arise. The Contract
Administrator upon request by ENGINEER shall
designate in writing and shall advise ENGINEER
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
-11-
-
-,.--.
--
............=-
in wri ting
whom all
day-to-day
add re ssed.
of one or more COUNTY employees to
communications pertaining to the
conduct of the Project shall be
(b) ENGINEER shall inform the Contract Administrator
in writing of the representative of ENGINEER to
whom matters involving the conduct of the Project
shall be addressed.
7.11 ALL PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED
(a) This document incorporates and includes all prior
negotiations, correspondence, conversations,
agreements or understandings applicable to the
matters contained herein and the parties agree
that there are no commitments, agreements or
understand ing s concerni ng the subject mat ter of
this Agreement that are not contained in this
document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no
deviation from the terms hereof shall be
predicated upon any prior representations or
agreements whether oral or written.
(b) It is further agreed that no modification,
amendment or alteration in the terms or
conditions contained herein shall be effective
unless contained in a wri tten document executed
with the same formality and of equal dignity
herewith.
7.12 NOTICES
Whenever either party desires to give notice unto the
othe r, it must be given by wri t ten not ice, sent by
registered United States mail, with return recei~t
requested, addressed to the party for whom it IS
intended, at the place last specified, and the place
for giving of notice in compliance with the provisions
of thi s paragraph. For the present, the part ies
designate the following as the respective places for
giving of notice, to-wit:
FOR MONROE COUNTY:
Manager
MONROB COUNTY Municipal Service District
Wing II-B
Public Service Building
Stock Island
Key West, Florida 33040
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
-12-
FOR ENGINEER:
Peter E. Robinson, Vice President
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
5950 Washington Street
HOllywood, Florida ~~OZ3
7.l~ SUB CONSULTANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS
In the event ENGINEER requires the services of any
subconsul tant, subcont rac tor or profe ssi onal assoc iate
in connect ion wi th the services to be provided
underthis Agreement, ENGINEER shall secure the
written approval of Contract Administrator before
engaging such subconsultant, subcontractor or
professional associate. The subconsultants, sub-
cont rac tors or profe ssi onal assoc i ates ident if ied on
Exhibit "C" are hereby approved for work on this
Project by COUNTY.
7.14 EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS
In the event of conflict between the terms contained
in this Contract and the terms of any documents
attached or incorporated herein, the terms of this
Contract shall control and be given full effect.
ARTICLE 8
OBSERVANCE OF LAWS
ENGINEER shall keep fully informed of all federal and
state laws, all local laws, ordinances, and regulations and all
orders and decress of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction
or authority which in any manner affect those engaged or
employed on the work, or which in any way affect the conduct of
the work. ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and
decress; and shall protect and indemnify COUNTY and all its
officers, agents, servants or employees against any claim or
liability arising from or based on the violation of any such
law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree caused or committed
by ENGINBER, its representatives, subcontractors, sub-
consultants, professional associates, agents, servants or
employees.
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
-13-
ARTICLE 9
TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE
Signature of this Agreement by ENGINEER shall act as the
execut i on of as t ruth- in-negot iat ion ce'rt if icate stat ing that
wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the
compensation of this Agreement are accurate, complete and
current at the time of contracting. The original contract
price and any addi tions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude
any significant sums by which COUNTY determines the contract
price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or
noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such
contract adjustments shall be made within one year following
the end of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 10
STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIREMENTS
Any requirements requested by the State of Florida DCA
stipulated under the agreement between COUNTY 'and the State
of Florida shall supersede articles or terms in this Agreement
between COUNTY and ENGINEER.
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
-14 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and
executed this Agreement on the respective dates under each
signature: MONROE COUNTY through its Board Of County
Commissioners, signing by and through its Mayor, authorized to
execute same by Board action on the day
of , 1987, and HAZEN AND SAWYER. P.C.,
signing by and through its Vice President, duly authorized to
execute same.
COUNTY
ATTEST:
MONROE COUNTY, through its
BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County Administrator and
Ex Officio Clerk of the Board
of County Commissioners of
MONROE COUNTY, Florida
By
day of
, 1987
Approved as to form and legality
By
AGREEMENT BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.,
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO REHABILITATION OF SOLID WASTE
FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN STUDY.
ENGINEER
WITNESSETH:
HAZEN AND SAWYER. P.C.
By
Peter E. Robinson, P.E.
Vice President
_day of
, 1987
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-87
-15-
EXHIBIT A
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C.
DIRECT LABOR RATES
RANGE OF HOURLY RATES TYPICAL
~
Principal $ 40 $50 $45
Project Manager $ 30 $50 $40
Senior Engineer $ 20 $40 $30
Engineer/Scientist $ 12 $25 $18
Sr. Technician $ 10 $20 $15
Drafter/Technician $ 7 $17 $12
Word Processor $ 6 $12 $ 8
HWD:0408R/04-09-87
A-I
\.
EXHIBIT B - SCOPE OF WORI
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
PHASE I ASSIGNMENT
A. BACIGROUND DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW
Task A-I: Iickoff Meeting
Immediately following the Notice-to-Proceed, the Con-
sul tants' (H&S/KE) Project Manager and key staff, will meet
wi th the Munic ipal Service Di st rict (MSD) Hanager and staff to
di scuss and agree upon implementation of the scope of
servi ce s, tasks, report ing requ i rement s, and pro jec t
schedule.
Task A-2: Review Reports and Data
Previous studies compl~ted for the MSD will be reviewed. Host
of this information IS in-house. These include studies of
transfer stations, hauling, and landfill costs, an evaluation
of the existing incinerators, economic analyses rate studies,
sludge and septic waste studies and designs, annual reports,
HAZEN AND SAWYER's solid waste disposal and management
study, and other available information. In addition, we will
request and review any other, recent MSD information such as
site maps, soi I bori ng inf ormat ion, data on waste tonnages,
seasonal variations, and breakdown among residential,
commercial, and industrial collections.
B. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Task B-1: Solid Waste Characteristics
1. Conduct on-si te waste survey at each solid waste
processing center to determine solid waste quanti ty and
composition, including daily and seasonal variations.
Currently, solid waste is classified as follows:
0 Garbage to incinerator
0 Trash to incinerator
0 Trash to landfill
0 Sludge and septic waste
Good records exist with respect to tonnage
Hwd:008IC/4-10-87
B-1
2. Conduct field material category breakdown by weight.
o Combustibles
o Ferrous metals
o Aluminum
o Yard trash
o Construction debris
3. Ident ify combust i ble component.
o Pape r
o Cardboard
o Yard waste
o Plastic
o Rubbe r
4. lcient ify non-combust ible component.
o Construction debris
o Glass
o Non-ferrous metals
s. Estimate waste characteristics of solid waste going to
the incinerators for the following parameters based
upon South Florida data.
o Heating value
o Moisture cQntent
o Ash content
o Ultimate analysis
6. Conduct an in-field energy and heat balance on
selective incinerators (Monroe County and Key West
Facility) varying the waste quantity and composition to
confirm actual fuel characteristics. Estimate impact
in dry/wet weather on moisture content and heating
value.
7. Determine quantities and characteristics of septic
waste and sludge generated and deli vered to the
respective collection locations.
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
B-2
8. Calculate impact of source separation on solid waste
composition.
Task B-2: Collection Cost
1. Review collection practices conducted by each of the
seven franchised collectors.
2. Determine centroid of each seven collection zones.
Calculate energy cost to transport waste quantity to
existing operating solid waste plant for each zone.
3. Calculate uni t energy and transport cost of the waste
after collection and conveyance to solid waste plant.
4.
Develop basic unit energy cost and
to use with time and distance
relative transport cost for
locations.
unit transport cost
data to determine
different facility
5. Review collection practices of septage tank and sludge
collection operations In MONROE COUNTY. Calculate
unit energy and transport cost to collection points.
6. Identify available transportation.
Task B-3: Existing Incinerator Facilities
1. Review status of existing incinerator units and update
earlier HAZEN AND SAWYER evaluation. Assess impact
of existing repairs undertaken in 1986. Confirm useful
service life (1995-1996) projected for existing units.
2. Ident ify potent ial ri sk wi th ex i st ing i nci nerators in
terms of O&M cos't and major replacement cost over the
useful service life.
3. Evaluate the ability of the existing incinerator units
to handle projected waste loads over their respective
service life under existing MSD operating condition.
4. Conduct an energy audit of existing facilities.
5. Review technical constraints and cost of adding energy
recovery facilities to existing incinerators.
Calculate range of typical energy recovery in terms of
elect ric power or steam which could be expected to be
generated with solid waste stream over remaining useful
service life of existing incinerators.
6. Determine most optimistic performance of existing
incinerator units with respect to volume reduction,
operation, with and without energy recovery based upon
unit energy and unit cost criteria.
Hwd:008IC/4-10-87
B-3
Task B-4: Existing Landfills
1. Confirm remaining life of existing landfills based upon
HAZEN AND SAWYER work. recent PBSJ. Inc. field
surveys, aerial photos and construction plans and HSD
records.
2. Calculate long term landfill volume requirements based
upon following options:
o Continue operation of three volume reduction
plants and current landfill practices
o
Calculate impact of implementation of
separation and recycling of S. 10. IS. 20
percent of the waste stream on landfill
requi rements
source
and Z S
volume
3. Calculate impact of implementation of most optimistic
non-burn compost technology coupled with dedicated
boilers to incinerate plastics. etc. on landfill volume
requirements.
4. Develop criteria for future landfill volume after
assessing various options and taking into account
allowances for downtime for incinerator facilities.
unprocessible waste disposal etc. over the next thi rty
years.
5. Estimate landfill volume requirements for next thirty
years.
Task B-S: Market Study
1.
Determine
the waste
methods.
aluminum.
Estimate
resources
quantities of recoverable resources based on
composition studies and various separation
Typical materials are ferrous metals,
glass. plastic. paper. compost. etc.
unit energy cost to separate recoverable
for applicable recovery methods.
2. Calculate typical energy conversion factors in terms of
electric power and steam. etc. for practical
incinerator technologies. Estimate range of unit
energy revenues from FPL as negotiated in Broward. Dade
and Palm Beach Counties.
3 Identify potential markets for electric power and/or
steam. Review viability of public/private
congeneration or energy management programs.
4. Identify potential markets and revenues per gallon for
fresh water produced by desalination plants.
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
B-4
..
S. Review possibility to seek Florida Public Service
Commission (PSC) approval to wheel power cogenerated at
a RRF to other county-owned facilities or to the Key
West electric system.
6. Conduct a market survey to compile information from
potential firms interested in purchasing recovered
secondary materials from a MONROE COUNTY recycle
ope rat ion. The pe rt i nent i nforma t ion to be sol ic i ted
in the secondary materials market survey include:
o Market specifications
o ~finimum/maximum quantities accepted
o Preferred shipping arrangements
o Pricing structure
o Firm's willingness to enter into multiple year
contracts
A survey form wi 11 be sent to fi rms operating in the
South Florida area and will include those firms which
have purchased materials or shipped scrap metal from
Port Everglades, Port of Miami or other location~.
An essential and continuous concern to all recycling
efforts is the availability of markets. Due to
economic and social factors, virgin material for
manufacturing of consumer products is still preferred
over the secondary (recyclable) material. Recyclable
materials must often meet vi rgin material market
specifications. In other words, used paper must
compete wi th wood pulp; used metal cans wi th iron and
bauxite ores; used glass with sand and silica; used
plastic with petroleum by.product; and leaves, grass
clippings and brush with topsoil. Price and demand for
recyclable materials also fluctuate considerably.
7. Prepare a separate report to the MSD of the results of
the market survey including the type of market speci-
fications required that must be strictly enforced even
during periods of fluctuating market demands and
prices.
Task B-6: Source Separation and Recycling Program
1. Throughout the United States communities have
established goals of source separation and recycling
from 8 percent up to ul t ima te ly recapturi ng 25 percent
of the waste stream. Establish preliminary recycling
goals for MONROE COUNTY based upon experience
elsewhere.
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
B-S
=-
--4.._ _-,.-.-----.
_~~_OM,-:...o..: -
._mlll!(A-- -
2. Review quantities of recoverable resources determined
during waste composition analysis and market survey.
3. Conduct additional surveys along collection routes to
better characterize solid waste picked up by franchise
collectors.
4. Based upon secondary source market study results and
observations by ENGINEER along collection routes
assess the viability of source separation and recycling
management alternatives:
0 Curbside collection
0 Drop-off centers
0 Buy-back centers
0 Front-end processing
0 ~1ateri a1 recove ry facility
0 Post-incineration ferrous recovery
0 Composting
5. Estimate waste stream reduction with various levels of
source separation programs.
6. Assess impact of integration of source separation
program (at various levels of recovery) on current
solid waste collection/disposal program including
energy requirements, operating cost and on landfill
1 if e. Calculate the ene rgy ava i lable and consumed by
the recoverable taction of the waste system.
7. Public participation Estimate the percentage of
recyclable materials which can be recovered based upon
voluntary versus mandatory curbside programs. Also
calculate quanti ties recoverable at centrali zed
recycling centers.
o Prepare a task report on the viable options with a
recommended program and two optional programs
o Hold a series of public workshops (total of six)
throughout MONROE COUNTY
o Hold three (3) public hearings with Board of
County Commissioners seeking policy direction on
long term goals and level of source separation
policy
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
B-6
8. Establish target goals and calculate impact on solid
waste quantities and characteristics based upon a
phased source separation program. Develop the
management plan for a recycling program. Such a
program would probably be phased as follows:
o Ini tiation of voluntary curbside source separation
in specific zones (pilot plant). Assist franchise
collector to defray additional cost.
o Once total impact is assessed including energy
requirements, collection methods and cost
a scertained and franchi se collec tors ra tes
modified, then the Board of County Commissioners
would implement a Countywide mandatory source
separation program. Initially, one or two
materials will be recycled depending upon market
conditions. With time more materials would be
recycled.
o Public drop-off centers would be conveniently
located for newsprint, glass, plastic bottles and
mixed metals. (Optional)
o MONROE COUNTY should ini tiate a high grade paper
recycling program. (Optional)
o Eventually a composting project(s) can be
undertaken for all yard trash and organic waste
Task B-7: Land Use, Zoning and Environmental Issues
The purpose of this task will be to identify important
issues and issue compliance with the objectives as set forth
by the Legislature of the State of Florida to be achieved
for managing land use and development within the Florida
keys. All future MSD solid waste planning and
implementation must be consistent with and meet the
objectives within stipulated guidelines. Key issues may
include siting new landfills in wetlands and developing
acceptable mitigation plans following the MONROE COUNTY
Land -Use Plan.
Envi ronmental assessment statement s wi 11 be prepared under
Task D- 2 landf i 11 si t i ng and Task F- 3 on the recommended
a It e rna t i ve .
The envi ronmental assessment statement s wi 11 be cons i stent
with the State of Florida, MONROE COUNTY Planning
Department and EPA guidelines.
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-87
B-7
-~
C. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS
Task C-l: Waste Quantity and Co.position Projections
1. Use projections for permanent and tourist population
over the 30-year planning period (in S-year increments)
and estimate future population within specific zones
including existing service areas and seven collection
routes based upon the Land Use Plan.
Z. Break out the construction debris component for each
area or collection route. Based upon past and current
construction activities project future construction and
demolition debris waste load.
3. Project waste quantities and component for both the
three service areas and seven collection routes.
4.
Review the re suI ts wi th MONROE COUNTY
planning staff to determine any unusual or
practices which could impact these data.
MSD a nel
specific
Task C-2: Land Use, Zoning and Environ.ental
Identify future constraints imposed on
management alternatives by land use, zoning,
environ~ental factors.
solid waste
energy, and
D. EXAMINATION OF BROAD RANGE OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
ALTERNATIVES
Task D-l: Generic Technology and Energy Manage.ent Overview
1. Provide an overview of avai lable technology to proces s
MONROE COUNTY waste stream with respect to a
central i zed solid waste processing center, three
existing locations or up to a total of six (6) solid
waste and sludge processing centers located throughout
MONROE COUNTY.
2. Select one or more technologies which appear most
suitable at various ranges of throughput capacity.
Selection criteria will include demonstrated
performance, costs, unit capabilities, and ability to
meet environmental standards.
Typical technologies are listed below but not 1imi teel
to these options:
Ene rgy Recovery
o RDF combustion
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
B-8
o Mass-burning modular incineration
Refractory wall
Waterwall
o Hass-burning waterwall field fabricated
European/Japanese grate systems
u. S. grate systems
Rotary combustion
o Fluidized bed combustion
o Codisposal of MSW with Sewage Sludge
Material recovery
o Front-End Processing
Evaluate the potential application of preprocessing
equipment recyclable materials separation, such as
those employed at Gallatin, Tennessee, in conjunction
with the various mass-burning units.
o Composting (including co-composting with sewage
sludge)
3.
The evaluation
disadvantages of
MONROE COUNTY.
shall
each
consi st of ad vantages
technology with respect
and
to
4. Viable technologies shall be screened wi th respect to
energy recove ry, re Ii abi 1 i ty, cost effect i vene ss, and
environmental impacts and proven track record.
S. ENGINEER shall recommend the viable technologies.
These will be confirmed by, COUNTY staff.
Task D-Z: Landfill Siting
1. Future landfill requirements will be determined in an
earlier task. Volume requi rements over the next 30
years wi 11 be calculated based both upon accepting or
not accepting the City of Key West unprocessible waste
and residue ash stream.
2. An initial sanitary landfill program will be evaluated
to expand both the Key Largo and Long Key landf i 11 s.
A part of this task is to develop a realistic offsite
mitigation program with associated cost and energy
requirements. The ENGINEER will meet with the
respective state and federal agencies to review the
total program. Next, ENGINEER will apprise MSD of
the probabi li ty of permi tting and constructing ei ther
landfill expansion.
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
B-9
~
3. The ENGINEER will also conduct a landfill site
selection survey for alternative sites located
throughout MONROE COUNTY. Sites selected by HAZEN
AND SAWYER in 1985 plus other identified available
sites will be evaluated with respect to capacity, haul
distance, availability, proximity to development,
environmental sensitivity and cost. These alternative
landfill sites will be ranked.
4. A report will be prepared reviewing all sites and
recommending ranked site(s) to be acquired by the
County Commission. As part of the report ENGINEER's
wi 11 prepare an envi ronmenta1 assessment statement on
the five (5) top ranked sites.
5. Six (6) public workshops and three (3) public hearings
will be conducted on the landfill siting issues.
Comments will be requested from all federal and state
agenc ie s.
6. A final report will be issued after obtaining input
from the Board of County Commissioners, the public and
concerned agencies. The report will include the
recommended landfill site(s), the necessary permitting
steps and implementation plan to acquire and construct
the necessary long term landfill(s).
Task D-3: Economical and Energy Screening of System
Alternatives On the Florida leys
1. A series of solid waste system (collection,
proce s sing, di sposal) a 1 te rnat i ves will be developed
using computer modeling techniques. Viable solid
waste system alternati ves will be ranked based upon
cost effectiveness, net energy usage and environmental
criteria. These alternatives will be based upon
conventional approaches with MONROE COUNTY. Input
to the model will include:
o Collection hauling cost and energy requirements
from the seven (1) franchise collection areas to
solid waste processing centers or transfer
stations
o Minimizing energy cost by installing transfer
station as required to insure cost effective haul
cost to solid waste processing stations
o Implementation of a phased source separation
prog ram
o Processing the Sludge/septic waste stream using
the appropri ate combina t ions of technolog ies and
energy management
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-81
B-lO
..
o Processi ng sol id waste st ream usi ng appropri ate
combinations of technologies and energy management
o Operating and maintenance requirements
o Calculate the processing cost per ton for each
component of the waste stream
o Energy and material revenues associated with
selected technologies
o Volume/weight of unprocessible waste stream and
ash to be hauled to the sanitary landfill for
final disposal
o
Determine cost /ton
fill(s), including
maintenance
to operate sanitary land-
closure and post-closure
This model is used to calculate the total systems cost
for possible combinations and the net energy
requirements. Additional input will be phasing out of
existing facilities (landfills, incinerator units) at
selected locations and replacing them with transfer
stations and new process technologies.
Various solid waste and sludge processing technologies
combinations will be evaluated. Typical systems are
out lined be low but the scope wi 11 not be limi ted to
these alternatives.
Alternative A
o Continue incineration with existing units at
three locations. Replace with identical units at
end of servicing life.
o Expand existing landfills at identifiable cost.
Alternative B
o Continue incineration with existing units at
three locations. Replace with identical units at
end of service life.
o 5i te new landfi 11. Haul ash/unprocessible waste
to operating landfills.
Alternative C
o Centralize incineration operation at one loca-
tion. Install energy recovery facilities.
o Site new landfill.
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-87
B-11
"
o Provide necessary transfer stat ions to haul raw
and unprocessible waste.
Other Alternatives (Up to 12 combinations)
o Phase out existing incinerators and substitute
competing energy efficient technologies at
various solid waste processing centers (Range
from one to six locations). Calculate energy
requirements and overall cost.
o Run system mode 1 to confi rm energy requi rements
and economics of various landfill sites.
o Provide necessary transfer stations to optimize
systemoperat ion and minimize energy requirements
to haul raw and unprocessible solid waste to
disposal sites.
2. Using system modeling compare not less than ten (10)
system alternatives on the basis of net energy usage
and lowest effective cost. Rank three (3) most viable
system alternatives.
3. As required by the MSD or requested by public evaluate
an additional five (5) system combinations or
alternatives.
4. Rank the system al ternat i ves based upon ene rgy
management, overall cost, proven technology,
reliability of operation and environmental impacts.
5. Run a sensitivity analysis on the five (5) top ranked
system alternatives based upon energy escalation
rates & secondary markets revenues over the 30 year
planning period. Rerank the top five (5) system
a 1 tern a t i ve s .
Task D-4: Screening, of Areawide Solid Waste Solutions
ENGINEER will identify areawide or innovative approaches
to the MONROE COUNTY solid waste program. These
alternatives will be evaluated in the same fashion as
outlined in Task D-3. Initial proposals are outlined below:
1. The City of Key West RRF has started up recently. It
is anticipated that the 2 unit plant will eventually
generate 2.6 MW for the Ci ty Electric Company.
Montenay International has sold its Metro Key West 150
TPD plant to Catalyst Waste-to-Energy Corp. This RRF
may need additional waste to operate at full
effectiveness and generate needed electrical revenues.
In turn limited landfill capacity remains in Key
West. An agreement between MONROE COUNTY and Catalyst
Hwd:008lC/4-10-87
B-12
..
Waste-to-Energy Corp. for waste disposal and landfi 11
capaci ty in the interim or long term may be in both
parties best interest. This will be explored in
detail outlining appropriate tipping fees, financial
and legal issues. ENGINEER will represent
COUNTY's interest in any negotiation.
2. Certain vendors or brokers have approached Dade County
and other municipalities seeking to obtain solid waste
to use as a fuel at foreign processing centers. A
4000 TPD, 70 MW system is proposed for Curacao, a
Dutch island off the coast of Venezuel a (1300 mi Ie s
S.E. of Miami). These commercial ventures should be
checked out with respect to cost and associated risks.
3. Cooperation should be confirmed with respect to siting
a sanitary landfill with either Dade County or Florida
Ci ty at adjacent si tes off the Florida Keys Islands.
Alternative solid waste programs with adjacent
municipalities or counties will be evaluated.
4. Innovative methods of transporting solid waste via
barge or incineration at sea will be evaluated.
s. All innovative sludge and solid waste systems will be
evaluated using cost, energy and environmental
criteria and compared against the five top ranked
system developed in Task D-3.
Task D-S: Preliainary Engineering
1. Resource Recovery Plants
ENGINEER will review the design information in its files
and supplement it as necessary by obtaining additional data
from technology vendors in the following areas:
o Single-unit capacities
o
Performance
facilities
records
at
existing
operating
o Chute-to-air pollution equipment quotations
o Chute-to-stack equipment quotations
o Energy conversion efficiencies for the incinerator/-
boiler and overall plant
o Equipment outline dimensions (catalog cuts)
Enough information will be assembled to permit the
preparation of generic plant layouts and arrangements at
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
B-13
v
the selected waste-to-energy plant capacities.
Consideration will not be limited to specific vendors;
information will be developed to accommodate any of several
vendors (in the same technology category) wi thin the space
enve lopes.
Ruild ing arrangement s wi 11 use typical equipment si ze sand
dimensions to allocate space for waste storage and
handling, incinerators and boilers, turbine generator(s),
and air pollution control equipment. Preliminary site
layouts then will be prepared for waste-to-energy plants
and sludge processing using the selected technologies and
capacities.
2. Material and Heat Balances
Heat, energy, and material balances will be prepared for
the selected resource recovery plant alternatives. This
will include consideration of plant auxiliary power
requirements and an estimate of net sellable power.
3. Pollution Control (BACT)
ENGINEER will participate in discussion with the staff
of the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation.
Each of the potential waste-to-energy technologies will be
reviewed with the staff to assess its acceptability from
the standpoint of combustion temperature, organics control,
auxiliary fuel requirements, and compatibility with various
air pollution control processes and equipment.
Cost quotations, outline equipment dimensions, power and
compressed air requirements, and chemical requirements will
be obtained from suppliers of air pollution control
equipment. Flows will correspond to selected MSW
throughput capac i ties, combust ion condi t ions (excess ai r) ,
and boi ler exhaust cond i t ions for the se lected
technologies.
4. Transfer Station
Preliminary sketches will be prepared for transfer stations
sized to handle:
o Projected waste quantities, if resource recovery
is not adapted at that site
o Projected nonprocessible wastes quantities if
resource recovery project(s) is implemented.
Hwd:008IC/4-10-87
B-14
'-
s. Determine Adequacy of Site
Based on investigations of site characteristics and the
resource recovery facility and transfer station layouts,
the adequacy of the existing si tes to accommodate any or
all of the project alternatives will be assessed. New
sites for solid waste transfer stations and on sludge
collection/processing centers will be identified.
6. Availability Factors
This task will evaluate the range of availability factors
which have been achieved by existing resource recovery
plants using the various combustion technologies. The
actual and warranted availability factors will determine
the expected and minimum annual power sales (kW-hr) for the
economic feasibility analysis. It should be noted that
plant availability factors can be increased by building in
equipment redundancy, but at an increased capital cost.
Examples would be a spare turbine-generator and/or spare
train of processing equipment and air pollution control
equipment.
7. PermittabiIity Review
This task will identify all permits required for resource
recovery f ac i Ii t ie s. The Ii st wi 11 i nc lude the types of
permits, issuing and reviewing agencies, application all
permi ts can be succes sfully acqui red, such factors as the
availability of pollution offsets, and public acceptance of
the project will be considered.
E. EVALUATION OF SOLID WASTE ALTERNATIVES
Fi ve (5) solid waste system alternati ves developed in Task
D-4 and two (2) alternatives in Task D-3 will be evaluated
in detail under this task.
Task E-l
A schedule wi 11 be
alternative (installing
year planning period.
will be outlined.
developed for implement ing each
fa c il i tie s , e t c .) 0 ve r the t we n t y
Key decision and potential risks
Task E-2
Capital cost estimates will be prepared for the resource
recove ry t landf ill and transfer stat ion al te rnat i ves.
These estimates will include:
o Direct construction costs
Hwd:0081C/4-10-87
B-1S
-.,
o Ind i rect costs such as spare parts, sales taxes (if
applicablel, operator training, startup costs,
engineering and design, permits and licenses,
construction performance bonds, interconnection
studies, and an allowance for purchasing air pollution
offsets
o Escalation
o Contingency
Task. E-3
Operating and maintenance cost estimates wi 11 be prepared
for the screened alternatives and will consider:
o Labor, based on operating staff and rates
o Utilities
o Consumable such as water treatment chemicals,
auxiliary fuel, ion exchange resins, and lime
o Material and spare parts
o Building, yard, and landscaping maintenance
o Insurance
o Licenses, taxes, and permits
o Reserve fund for major equipment repai r, replacement,
and overhaul.
Task. E-4
A 3D-year capi tal cost and projected O&M schedule wi 11 be
developed over the 3D-year period. Revenues will be
estimated and net tipping fees calculated.
Task. E-S
Total and net energy expenditures and potential energy
savings will be calculated over the planning period.
Task. E-6
Assess preliminary siting options
Task. E-7
Evaluate financing mechanisms
Hwd:DD8lC/4-lD-87
B-l6
~
'Task E-8
Management alternatives consisting of public versus private
ownership/operation will be evaluated.
Task E-9
Technical,
associated
evaluated.
legal, financial
wi th each prog ram
and institutional risks
will be outlined and
Task E-IO
Evaluate fiscal and political implementation concerns.
Task. E-ll
Evaluate existing agreements
required among county/local
organizations.
and those
governments
which would be
and/or pri vate
Task E-12
An interim report will be issued to the Board of County
Commissioners ranking the alternative solid waste plans and
methods of implementing the program.
F. RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION
Task F-I: Public Workshops
Following publication of the interim report which will
present ENGINEER's evaluation of program alternatives,
three (3) formal presentation and three (3) public
workshops be held at geographically distributed locations
through the keys. The purpose of these workshops will be
to obtai n c i t i zen eva luat ion of the a1 te rnat i ves. (Othe r
hearings, formal presentations and workshops also will have
occurred earlier as part of our public participation
program) .
Task F-2
Obtain input
Commissioners.
from
~10nroe
County
Board
of
County
Task. F-3
Issue Final Report containing the recommended course of
action for implementation of the preferred alternative with
an environmental assessment statement.
Hwd:0081C/4-l0-87
B-17
...
G. PUBLIC INFORMATION/PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM
A continuous program will be designed and implemented
throughout the course of the feasibility study with the
purpose of keeping the Mayor, the County Commission and the
general public informed of and involved in the progress of
this study. The primary objectives being:
o
To inform, elicit comments, and assure
county and agency representat i ves
participation will be welcome.
o To deve lop an understand ing of the communi ty' s
concerns and issues, and to accommodate these within
one or more alternatives under consideration.
citizens and
t ha t the i r
o To communicate to the communi ty the purpose of thi s
study, and assuring them that the safety and integrity
of their community is paramount.
The success of the public participation program will
require close coordination among, Board of County
Commissioners, County and agency personnel, ENGINEER
(H6S/KE), the general public, and interested parties.
o Be available to meet with the County Commission and
the public on a scheduled basis;
o Hake up to nine (9) public or formal hearings with the
County Commission.
o Hold fifteen (IS) public workshops throughout the Keys
with the purpose of obtaining citizen input,
recommendations and concerns with regard to the
alternatives proposed. Areas of concern are landfill
siting, source separation program and evaluation of
system alternatives.
0 Provide all slides, graphs, handouts and other
material re qui red to conduct the proposed:
0 Formal presentat ions
0 Public workshops
0 Scheduled meetings
0 Prepare a briefing document at least one week
before the three workshops
0 Deve lop a ma i Ii ng list and issue status reports
bi-week1y
Hwd:008IC/4-l0-87
B-l8
,
TASI
D-2
B-6
F-I
WlM>>JiR OF...J:.2W-L HgA@.INGS
PUBLIC
lfORISHOP
Landfill Siting
Source Separation Program
Interim Report and
Recommendation of Action
6
6
3
IS
PUBLIC/FORMAL
HEARINGS
3
3
3
9
TOTAL
H. PROJECT DELIVBRABLES
Task H-I
Monthly status reports will be delivered to the County over
the project life.
Task H-2
The Public Participation Program is defined under Task F.
The ENGINEERs will be available to the County Commission
on a scheduled basis.
Task H-3
It is anticipated that the following reports will be issued:
Landfill Siting
- Initial Report
- Final Report
- Executive Summary
Source Separation
Program
- Interim Report
- Final Report
- Executive Summary
Recommended
Course of
Action
- Interim Report
- Final Report
- Executive Summary
The final report of the recommended course of action will
summarize the landfill siting and the source separation
programs.
One hundred (lOa) copies of each interim and final report
will be issued. Fifty (SO) copies of the Executive Summary
will be issued.
Hwd:008IC/4-10-87
B-19
...
EXHIBIT B - SCOPE OF WORK
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ADDITIONAL ASSIGNMENTS
The scope of services for these addi tional assignments and
the "not-to-exceed" cost ceiling will be mutually agreed upon
by COUNTY and ENGINEER and authorized by COUNTY prior to
commencing work. These assignments are part of the solid waste
plan and design scope of work under the original Agreement.
Prior to authorization for any additional assignments, an
amendment to this agreement must be mutually agreed upon by
COUNTY and ENGINEER.
o
Environmental
agencies
permi tting
activities
requested
by
o Design services for transfer stations, sludge
collection, processing or disposal servIces, energy
recovery facilities, solid waste collection and
processing facilities and required solid waste or
recycling facilities required by COUNTY
o Land appraisal and acquisition services
o Boring, survey work and analytical services
o Landfill design services
o
Permitting, siting and
including mitigation work
environmental
services
o Preparation of' a RFP for an energy efficient solid
waste systems
o Technical visits on behalf of COUNTY to other solid
facilities
o Representation of COUNTY including legal,
institutional or technical services with respect to
regional solid waste problems and solutions
o Financial or rate studies of various solid waste
options
Hwd:008lC/4-l0-87
B-20
~
EXHIBIT C
SUBCOllTRACTORS
Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
Coastal Zone Resources, Inc. (CZR)
Chen & Associates, Inc.
Luis A. Prieto - Soils Consultant
Ronald J. Proto - Solid Waste Consultant
HWD:0408R/04-09-87
C-l
..
,~
i
I-
Vl ~ 0 0 ~ 8
0 ~ ~ 8 8 0 0 0 0
~ fa 0 ~ 0 0 0
0 ~ Il'I " ~ 0 ~
-I .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~ \0 ~ M ,.. 0\ N .- N \0 co 0\ In 0\
.- Il'I ..,. 0 In co In N ..,. N 0\
0 .- ~
I- -
-.
N
...-
W
....
~ 0 8 8 8 0 ~I 0
Vl Vl 0 0 0 8 0 0
~~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ 0 " ~ ~ N
I~ . . .. .
0 M N ..,. 0 M ..,. N M 0\ \0
- 0. N M 0\
w>c &:
cxw - - u
.... C
l- &: 0
:a Q.
2 ::I
W 2 '-
eII~
~ e: -. .... ell
-1< ~ .- III
- 0.0 ...- 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 g 8 8 0 Q.ca
Vl ...- Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... .Q .
Vl W cx ..,.. ~ ~ \0 In ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +> '-
< 2CX
!i!o -I 0 . . . .- +> B
-I :l ..,. ~ 0 Il'I Il'I N ~ co ..,. Il'I 0 N N ::I....
Cl .....ri - .- In .- ..,. ,.. ,.. Il'I N ..,. 0 E~ u
co -I Il'I 0 ca .
.....(,!l - - Il'I '- ~ +>
I-Vle: ..
-~2~ ~o. III
~ 0
~Q.!~ N"c:I ca U
2/ c ell
~ I W 0 Vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c ca &: '-
.... I-~ cx ..,. 0 N Il'I In In 0 co In 0 0 ..,. 0 '- B
:::I N co 0\ N " N ,.. ~ co In ,.. M Q. . cu
>-Vl.... 0 . .. . ::1% > U
cx<o % .- co 0 ca
121 "c:IO '-
ell ~ ...
~i :';$ c
Vl 0
-I W .Q 01.... U
I- ~ > C "c:I I
- '-- ::I .Q
Vl I- ~ o '- ca :::t
0 l!s e: .Q ~ III
~ i! :II Z - lIlI >.
w CI: .... ... ~ -I III ,... III
- Vl Vl - .... ... ~ - ell ~ ~
... - - > I- (,!l va .... ~~ lIlI
~ Vl Vl .0 CX -I 2 I ~ ell ::J '- ::I
W >- a >- _w < - &I.. ,... ,... ell ,...
-I Ii :I -I Vl <l; CI: 0 Q. ,... U "c:I U
s i~ ~ w a ...... z: - c : c
>- w - .... i!~ a:I .... -
~ ~I 8!ii a -I Vl
- I- Vl - ~ ~ ~8
~ 01- o- S; !I >- !I -.
:Ie 1-8 ~o Vl 0 I~ .- N
g - .... l!5Vl ~ ...- ...-
w ~~ ~cx i! I- ~ Vl
~ <0. i!~ tii - >- .... Cl ....
i~ 0. Vl cx !~ ..... &1..2 -I
I- - W'" - w 1-1 (,!l ~ a ;!;ffi !
~!I Vla I-CI: -I 2 - ... 2
- 0.:::1 ~ -I - - ~;i I
I~ - - .... -I ;5 - >- - a z ~> w ,..
CXI- V V CX(,!l ~ W - :::ICI: - -I > Vl co
~o ~~ !I~ ~&I.. ~CX .... -I ;i~ -10 .... W ,
tj~ I:l/: W ~ ~5rE -I I- 0\
....>c ow ~I!s ~ ac ~;i w w 0 0
.~ aw va ac Vl Q. I:l/: 0. _ Cl a I
..,.
0
......
I:l/:
\0 N M..,. Il'I co
a 0
e: a:I a:I ~ a aa a w &I.. (,!l % ..,.
0
w ~ ~ ~ w w w w w w w w
Vl Vl Vl Vla Vl Vl Vl Vl II) ~
~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ < ~ < ~
... ... ...