Resolution 152-1982t i '
RESOLUTION. 152 _1982
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, has received an application from Fla. Dept. of Trans.
and
WHEREAS, in compliance with State Statute, it is necessary
94
as part of the permitting procedure to read the following Biological
Assessment into the Record, as follows:
The applicant proposes to revise a currently held permit (#,44-23956)
to include two areas that have already been filled. Approximately
138 cubic yards of fill have been placed below MHW and 46 cubic
yards have been placed landward of MHW.
The purpose of this fill is to provide approaches for either side
of a.new bridge that will span Vaca Cut. Specifically, fill was
placed over the northern limits of the proposed bridge toe of
slopes on both the Miami and Key West ends of the bridge.
In both areas, filling occurred as a result of -the placement of
spoil from the permitted dredging of Vaca Cut. On. the Key West
end, the spoil material.was premarily limestone. On the Miani end,
fill composition was primarily soft.marl which had been previously
placed many years ago during the original construction of the Vaca
Cut causeway.
No turbidity containment was utilized during the placement of this
spoil. Fill slopes are relatively steep, on the order of 1 hori-
zontal: 1 vertical or steeper.
Bridge construction is currently in process, which at present,
involves the excavation of Vaca Cut in the immediate bridge area
to a depth of -18'. This excavation has been done only on the
north side of the existing bridge in preparation for the construc-
tion of the north one-half of the new bridge. When this half is
complete, the old bridge will be removed and the south one-half
of the new bridge will be erected. Dredging on the south side of
th.e existing bridge will proceed after the first half of the new
bridge is complete.
Excavation of the bridge causeway on the north side of the Miami
end should be the next area of work. It:is proposed by the appli-
cant that currents will be reduced underneath the new bridge after
Vaca Cut is deepened and the causeway on.the Miami end of the
bridge is removed.
From an historical standpoint, Vaca Cut has undergone many changes
having to do with the Overseas Highway. At one time, the Cut was
apparently filled from one end to another, however, this solid
causeway was, at some point in time, broken through by the extreme
head differential that exists between the waters of the Atlantic and
Florida Bay. To span this break, which expanded over time, the
present bridge was constructed. This bridge is now structurally
unsound and in need of repair, thus facilitating the construction of
a new bridge.
On the Key West end of the existing bridge, excavation of the
channel (north side) was accomplished from a fill pad placed into
the channel and then removed after excavation. During the excava-
tion of the channel on this side, dredge spoil was placed in a large
pile which overlapped the existing shoreline. The area filled is
somewhat of a backwater area out of the main current, due to its.
rq It
Resolution
Florida Department
Page Two
of Transportation
protection by the land protrusion that is part of the 'existing
bridge approach. This backwater area is relatively shallow (-1'
to -41), possessing a fine layer of primarily inorganic sedimenta-
tion. Very scattered turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) is found
here.
On the Miani end, excavation of the channel was accomplished from
the existing causeway, with spoil placed in a similar manner as
on the Key West end. The area filled on this side is also some-
what of a backwater area, although currents are expected to come
into play here after the existing causeway is removed. The sub-
mergent substrate here also consisted of fine sediments
supporting turtlegrass. As was the case for the Key West side,
the actual shoreline supported no fringe vegetation, but rather
displayed a significant amount of erosion due to the fine marl
texture of the upland shoreline. Due to this erosion, the sub-
mergent marine community is not stabilized near shore. In this
area,'green algae (Batophora sp.) was the dominant benthic vegetation.
The major impact of concern resulting from the modified placement
of fill is the turbidity (both long and short term), erosion and
sedimentation resulting from the instability of the newly placed
fill. This is a particular concern on the Miami side, where
the fill composition if finely textured and the waterward face
of the fill may be exposed to strong currents after the causeway
excavation is complete.
An adverse -impact already realized was the elimination of -1000
square feet of baybottom. This loss should be offset over the
long term by the creation of new bay bottom where the exsiting
causeway is to be removed.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the above Biological Assessment has been read
into the record and duly considered pursuant to Florida Statute
253.124 by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida,
thia 17th day of May
a regularly scheduled meeting.
(Seal)
'ftt ris
Attest
, 19 82 at
BOARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONRO COUNTY, FI&$ID
L & —to d-i6tIll,
By
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND AEGAL SUFFICIENCY.
Z'& _& - -
BY 1
Att~s GNIa
BOARD OF rOUNTY COMMIM S
Wilhelmina Hervey, District 1 -- '
Curt Blair, District 2
Mayor Protem Jerry Hernandez, Jr., District 3 l
MAYOR George E. Dolezal, District 4 : `<ti k"
Ken Sorensen, District 5 ±-
0UNTY 01, iONROF
Z
KEY WEST,RIDA 33040
(305) 294 4641
Lucien C. Proby
Monroe County Attorney
310 Fleming Street
Key ;Vest, Florida 33040
WOF:
Director
Building, Planning an
Zoning
P.o. sox .Room 205 Wing
Public Service Buildi
5825 Jr. College Rd.
Key West, Florida
e 33043-4399
I, the undersigned, do hereby attest that all date and
information is complete in the package of the applicant as follows:
Certificate of Complete Enclosures
1. County Biologist Report
2. Resolution(Florida Dept. of Transportation)
Revised plan for dredging and excavation of
Vaca Cut Channel.
3. Permit
4. Application for Permit
5. Site Plan
6. Location Map
7. DER Assessment
Date 5- �- Yc-�--
i
12172;1
e
h
D E P A R T M E N T A Li CORRESPONDENCE
DATE:
Ap AiZ 30 1992
SUBJECT: aepaAtment o� TAant poAtation: Rev.i�sed Ptan 6oA Dredging and Excavation o
TO: Atan LezzteA, DiiLectm DEPT: Bu,adi.ng, Ptanni.ng and Zoning
FROM: MaAk Robetrtson, Envi)Lon. B.iotm DEPT: Building, Ptanning and Zoning
LEGAL: Section 5, Tot sh i.p GGS, Range 32E, Vaca Key Cut, Vaca Key
INTROIDUCTION:
Th is appti.cation ins to be Aev.iewed by the County Commi's s ion .in accoAdanee
with ChapteA 19-111(a)(5).
DISCUSSION:
The applicant ptopozu to mbdigy the constnucti.on ptan/s 4oA the new
Oveueas Highway BAri.dge at Vaca Cut. The modi4.ication entaitz the
ptaeement o4 138 cubic yan.d,5 ;o 6 4 P 2 wa teAwatcd o4 MHW and 46 cubic yohds
tandwoAd o4 MHU at the toe o4 the btri.dge embankment 6tope. Attachment
1 i6 the Aevized appt cation :�otim and z to ptans . The pAo poz ed wo tk
i,6 atneady ,in ptogAezz .
The D.E.R. B.ioAepnt, Attachment 2, di,5cu/s/sez the potentiat envLion
mentat .impacts o6 th is pAo j ec�t.
a,
The miginaf ptav5 weAe appAvved as County CommizIsl.on Rezotuti.on 022-1981,
Attachment 3.
RIA 1 I IATT (W
A potenti.a2 conceAn 41'Lom thZ5 p)Lo jest is tuAbid ty and eAos ion 4Aom the
ptacement of un6tab,isized 4.i(t. The attached-D.E.R. Bimepmt di6cus/ses
this pozz b,i 2ity in gAeateA detait.
RECOMMENDATION:
AppAovat
The appticant 5houd be encou/,Laged to addAe/ss the Aecommendationz .in the
D.E.R. B.iokepmt eon_ceAn,ing zitab-i.Lization o6 the 6.i e ptaeed at the toe
o6 the stope.
READ:
OB EN
PI.1`, — G BUILDI`.G & ZONIiIG DEPARTMENT PERTMIT
^�I (fir PERMIT F01 R ENC't`:'ATION, THE DEPOSIT OF N0.
COL3�iTY I ; %''` FILL, OR STRUCTURAL ACTIVITIES IN THE
` WATERS OR VTETLANDS OF MOINROE COUNTY
1) Property owners name & mailing address
2) Date
FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Florida Dept. of Transportation
April 12, 198
• Miami Regional Service Center
Resolution No.
') Phone number
401 N.W. 2nd Avenue - Suite 590
Miami, Florida 33128
377-5360
Date:
4) Contractor or agent's name, mailing address & phone number
Not available until awarding of contract.
L
5) Legal description of property:
Section Key paw Koji Subdivision
j
I Township 66S Lot Block
Range 32E Street, road or mile marker Bridge
Volume of material: dredged/excavated filled/deposited
c.y. c.y. 138 c.y. 46 e.y.
waterward landward waterward landward
RU-1 to n9:h4'hVv��t bf le�A t ing Vaca Cut Bz*d�e" �b-2 anR''h�"--3 to 'the
ZONING: southwest; RU-1 to the northeast and RU-3 to the southeast
PURPOSE:
Cost or Permit Estimated cost of Construction
Approved by
Chairman
BOARD OF COUNTY CWMISSIOiERS
OF M(X ROE COUNTY, FLORID ..
Biologist Com.,-r.ents - Restrictions or Special Conditions if any:
Approval. The applicant should be encouraged to address the recommendations
in the D.E.R. Bio-report concerning stabilization of the fill placed at
the toe of the slope.
Conv in File Date
n7�
Pop
Era;ir iTur '.•tl'•.TrP(J ir,ii): ()Fty owners name & ma i i i ng ad.,r u' s ._ ' j JI r.c "- - -- i or l:ep;: trre;, -;Js? Oni,
Florida Department of Transportation,! tiove!r Lcr ;, 1900 _
' Mi arni Regional Service CenterT --- -
401 N. W. 2nd Avenue - Suite 59(1
'Miami, Florida 33128
Contractor or ag'nt' s n, tne, ma 1 I I I.rJ ,1r1:ii'', ; r, lJi ;;(:': :I'•Lr•r
Not available until awardin,l of ccintract. !Jil i l r.' It a', scion as known.
egaI description of property:
VaC;i 1 Ll !'r i i�l5di :' i :irJr
S e i, t i o n 5 -- - --- ------
--lilocl•,
T---- --- - - - -- ---
ownship, 66 S -
+- road or, Ini i�. n!,iri:r_r', (irilar!L!
`Range, 32 E — _-- — - _--
(if acreage)
t;�escr.ibe the proposed ac�ivi�.;', met.;a s-�1` cor;;%r-:;:t1r,n r111o'-nt (';f rratcrial—�, in — cubic
-. - — -
yards), to be excavated or disch1irged.
To replace one bridge and construst a ne,,v bridoe, both approximately 41 feet.
The proposed., project will involve the elirlirlat.ion of channel construction by
`dredging 13028 c.y. and excavating 15195 c.y. This action will reduce the
velocity of..water at the cut, thus providing safer navicl;tion under bridges.
Mevised 4-8-3?_L.
dr2dgedle xca\a,(d
volu(;,e of material: (1.47ac)--
13�c Y 1E-9-5 Y 1 aF3_c . y.
water�•rard landward It•rrrt(--,rward Iana r d
of i1.1-
& zip code o.1.1_of h1 N.!!. _ of 1.'!. J. u` M.N.!r1
7 Name, address f adjoining propr.�•r., ovrn� r ;rh �e pT'Operry:1Front, crater ,ray.
(1) John W: Armsby ,(3} E!r;,::a M. Thom son,et al Trustee
2575 Peachtree, N.E. Apt. 12-C i 'ill Van Phister Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30305 !ov !'Jest, Florida 32040
(2) Bruno Manno, et ux '- - -(i; ;pick J. Aldacosta, et ux ------
308 South Street Vaca Cut Bridge
Ri then Scor_es�-.1
'. This completed application form tvi11 h�._�c_ c �r,�l i by th_ foilcr:rtng, or rt ,vii
?lOT be pruc es;'"'
a) Two (2) sets of drawin,s, on �', � 11 11;1^.':', (i:?'.... :oc:lt ior" , plr't T:l:rn, 'top Vinr.
and cross section of proposal., drawn to scai .
` b) 'lppl i cation processing fee as fo l l ows :
$25.00 for dredge, fill, clock-, OR arrN' structur... r,i,unt)r:n;,ttrra, t;a:2r hod ic,,.
$10.00 for vcriical seawalls o:.
S25.00 for any combination of the al;ove acriviti(: i)c•T- si.tc.
Application is hereby made for a per•rnito autirc,r-i7 the activities described herein.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this app]ication, and
to .the best of my knowledge & belief such information is true, complete u accurate.
I further certify that I possess the authority to undert-ike the proposed activities.
All provisions of laws and ordinances govc:rnira this t.yiw of viork will be complied
with, whether specified herein or not. ' The granting ')f a permit .dory not pr•escr:~e to
give authority to violate or cancel the provi Jon of any county, state or f�d�_ra1 la.r
regulating construction or performanc:c of con,:t1";Ictioil of earl; type rJf facility.
_ -_- Sirin,tturcr of afrPlicartr•%�r'nt -- [late
cr Department Use Only -----_..__ -- -- --
rson accepting application
Fee u rr» eipt
Cost of permit
App rovt_J by ,r^,s s i s to n'. Di rector
Estimated cost of construction _
i°r:'.
I _ •r rii;;S r i
Typ.•Silt Barrier rA o 50 M
TOE Fi/ l _ / _� ::� 2 SCALE (Ff.) 3'OMin.
SLOPE �, , l O
_I � / � y o 41 f-4 I1-1
V V V .A Exca ofi on
t V V V /Below M.H.1�1.
S.B. Hridge , V 1,V V Temporary
Sheet Fling
N.B. Bridge% *Y r
d V ' V V M.H.W
j
v`JV V V �/ �TGE Q
EL-13 V V a
0-Ezcevation
�§ Below M.H.W.
Excavation
0 I � !:a Landward
0 I 235' r°' from M.H.W.
PL.. A N
lit —
O CHANNEL EXCAVATION
0
Constr
20 S.g
tG �[bt.HW. 40.05 -
0
-40
SECTION A -A
SECTION 0-3'
�Z-/� EARTH FILL
EARTH FILL= 136 CU.Yd.
BELOW M H W
EARTH FILL= 46 CU.Yd.
ABOVE MHW
CUCCT RA n
SHEET NO.' 5
REV. 4/8/82
Cyclopson
Stone a Slurry
-Slope 2:1
EL. + 3.0'
'Slope Protection'
SECTION THRU FORWARD SLOPE OF
PROPOSED BRIDGE
Limits of Proposed
Slope Protection
Edge of I Edge of Shoulder
Si&wfalk
rS!oq,e 2:I
Cyclopear 1
Stone 8 Slur).�`
This slops to match EL. + 3.0 ±
Roadway Fill Sicpe. ' —
cA 2C
10 SECTION THMJ SIDE SLOPES
- 0 RiPRAP DETAILS
' D FESRUARY liQQQ
( ! Driva ionipprc-y Shaet pi'ieiq along north side at east end
4@ eaisf;rg bridge cnd rocdwcy 0T)Prov:%
2, nra cN .nnPI ®rs Bay side of &Am 3 ilg roedway
3. Come. ruct r v4 s . Bri6cj*G and roo6way
4. Remore cliz.1L1-9 ervd roadway and complete
ctra�-�+ ezcouc{icn
[� EDERKL AID PARTICIPATING
PR„POSED
CHANNEL EXCAVATION
t UD CONSTRUCTION OF
S.R.S OVER VACA CUT P
.e. no. 646C)BG
OEPAP. TMENT OF
i
1
/EXCAVAi ION/
I PHASE 1ii i
EXISTING '
UPLAN6 i
FILL
TE ,P-
SHEETIN
EXCAVATION
NLASE I \
- 235' —
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
1-40'—
°'G, EXISTING
CHANNEL
(DREDv_) _
EX;:�1`JA Nd T
P'rIASE IV EXISTM
BRIDGE
E HCAVA
PHASE
.PROTECT
BERM
5'
`Ft9 H4�
L!I'�Ei
ION (DR7(D
E
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
de
(DREDGVI '
EX&T I
PHASE IV -1-
PHASE I
EXISTING
UPLAND FILL
t
c
DGE)
NiH,1` EhC4VATI0N
LINE LIMITS
I
EXISTI�<G TOP
OF BANK
I EAKT1i
EXCAVA-i-IM LIMITS
EXCAVATION
L:•,NdD�'�ARD ETION (DREDGE)
X(;ATi
PHASE 11 a IV EXCAVATION
f --�� PHASE I a III
PP,t�TEC T ! Ve EEI?M5
M H W t o.►_"j \L,
3=0iL'Q TMM OF- ISB� CF CHANT'11I i
EXISTING - IG.O ... _ EXCAVATIM4
v
SHEET 5A
REV. 4/8/82
� p,� FPi3RUARV 19SG
FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATI�aI
PROPOSED
CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND CONS I RU*GTION ON
S.R.5 OVER VACA CUT
B.I. M10- 616 86
FLGRIDA DENIYART11-JENT OF
Yn R•f�[� 1 �
.per ....�_.r R{'AT1C-MJ..
._
PER11IT APPLICATION APPRAISAL
i
File No.; 44-23956 County:,'; Monroe
Applicant Name: Florida Department of Transportation
Date: 4-12-82
Address: 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Suite 590, Miami, FL 33128
Agent (if applicable): Dr. John C. Goodknight
Address: 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Suite 590, Miami, FL 33128
Location of pi-bject: Section(s) 5 Township 66S Range 32E
Section(s) Township Range
Local Reference: Marathon Shores
Water Body: Vaca Cut
Water Classification of Project Area: III Adjacent Waters: III
Aquatic Preserve: -----
Outstanding Florida Waters: --'--
On site inspection by: John A. Meyer
OAte of Inspection: 8-26-80 Original Application: Yes No X
Revised Application: Yes XNo_ Date: 4-8-82 Date of 2nd Insp. 3-22-82
Biological and Water Quality Assessment
A. Description of proposed project and construction techniques.
Quantify area of project which extends into waters of the state
(including the .submerged lands of those waters and the transi-
tional zone of the submerged land) as defined in Section 17-4.02
and Section 17-4.28, Florida Administrative Code.
B. Biophysical features of general area. Include comments concerning
extent of development of adjoining properties as well as relevant
historical facts about the area.
C. Biophysical features of specific project site and spoil site if
applicable. Include identification of bottom types and any
relevant historical facts about the area of the project..
D. Potential impact of project,on biological resources and water
quality. Address long-term impact as well as immediate impact
for all aspects of the project.
E. Suggestions, where appropriate, for modifications that may reduce
or minimize the potential impact of project.
PERM 16-10(Rev.6/79)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSI'ORTATIUN
#44-23956
Monroe County - Marathon
Page"Two,
A. The applicant proposes to zevise a currently held permit
(#44-23956) to include two areas that rave already been filled.
Approximately 138 cubic yards of fill have been placed below MHW
and 46 cubic yards have been placed landward of MHW.
The purpose of this fill is to provide approaches for either side
of a ne-w.bridge that will span Vaca Cut. Specifically, fill was
placers over the northern limits of the proposed bridge toe of
slop�"on both the Miami and Key West ends of the bridge.
In both areas, filling occurred as a result of the placement of
spoil from the permitted dredging of Vaca Cut. On the Key West
end, the spoil material was primarily limestone. On the Miami end,
fill composition was primarily soft marl which had been previously
placed many years ago during the original construction of the Vaca
Cut causeway.
No turbidity containment was utilized during the placement of this
spoil. Fill slopes are,relatively steep, on the order of 1 hori-
zontal: 1 vertical or steeper.
B. Bridge construction is currently in process, which, at present,
+� involves the excavation of Vaca Cut in the immediate bridge area
to a depth of -18'. This excavation has been done only on the
north side of the existing bridge in preparation for the construc-
tion of the north one-half of the new bridge. When this half is
complete, the old bridge will be removed and the south one-half
of the new bridge will be erected. Dredging on the south side of
the existing bridge will proceed after the first half of the new
bridge is complete.
Excavation of the bridge causeway on the north side of the :Miami
end should be'the next area of work. It is proposed by the appli-
cant that currents will be reduced underneath the new bridge after
Vaca Cut is deepened and the causeway on the Miami end of the
bridge is removed.
From an historical standpoint, Vaca Cut has undergone many changes
having to do with the Overseas Highway. At one time, the Cut was
apparently filled from one end to another, however, this solid
causeway was, at some point in time, broken through by the extreme
head differential that exists between the waters of the Atlantic and
Florida Bay. To span this _break, which expanded over time, t`.e
present bridge was constructed. This bridge is now structurally
unsound and in need of repair, thus facilitating the construction of
a new bridge.
'Q'V
• %"F',1L : �.' "• •���„m.m�r.•iae•sw,grictw.
�S
a!r�:zQ 7ItRPJ�4.[�4.aFkLtTes,.^S+a'a'*r.s:Mtua4a:tr,s.�.: nnaaw.aswr..em�yaTe•2s+n•..-sv.sa:crTJT^=t!'HTT�l:-'P'C/�q�.t$O:.gV.:3^Jt4T.snlAYA..Q+.9'BD�.�T�xV
i
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
#44-23956
Monroe County - Marathon
Page Three
C. On the Key West end of tha existing bridge, excavation of the
channel (north side) was accomplished from a fill pad placed
into the channel and then removed after excavation. During the
excavation of the channel on this side, dredge spoil was placed
in a large pile which overlapped the existing shoreline. The
area fled is somewhat of a backwater area out of the main
current, -due to its protection by the land protrusion that is
part�#vf the existing bridge approach. This backwater area is
relaCrIvely shallow (-1' to -4'), possessing a fine layer of
primarily inorganic sedimentation. Very scattered turtlegrass
(Thalassia testudinum) is found here. -
On the Miami end, excavation of the channel was accomplished
from the existing causeway, with spoil placed in a similar man-
ner as on the Key West end. The area filled on this side is
also somewhat of a backwater area, although currents are ex-
pected to come into play here after the existing causeway is
removed. The submergent substrate here also consisted of fine
sediments supporting turtlegrass. As was the case for the Key
West side, the actual shoreline supported no fringe vegetation,
but rather displayed a significant amount of erosion due to the
fine marl texture of the upland shoreline. Due to this erosion,
the submergent marine community is not stabilized near shore.
In this area, green algae (Batophora sp.) was the dominant
benthic vegetation.
D. The major impact of concern resulting from the modified placement
of fill is the turbidity (both long and short term), erosion and
sedimentation resulting from the instability of the newly placed
fill. This is a particular concern on the Miami side, where
the fill composition is finely textured and the waterward face
of the fill may be exposed to strong currents after the causeway
excavation is:complete.
An adverse impact already realized was the elimination of +1000
square feet of baybottom. This loss should be offset over the
long term by the creation of new bay bottom where the existing
causeway is to be removed.
JOH A. ME ER, EN . SPEC. II
DATE: Apr/1 26, 1982
{/f READ: jj oZ 7 Z
�j rya c h try, en t a2..
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
#44-23956
Monroe County - Marathon I
Page Four
E. It is recommended that the applicant address the stabilization
of the newly created fill toe of slope. This stabilization
should be done through the placement of riprap or rock rubble
armor at the toe of slope.' This stabilization should be
accomplished as soon as possible, with silt screens employed
in the,, interim .
9.
f7 e- 41sw c41` 3
r
M0rM R0E-=
Ct3WAJTY
s
PL1\^dING, BUILDING & ZONING DEPART
PERMIT FOR EXCAVATION, THE DEPOSIT OF
FILL, OR STRUCTURAL ACTIVITIES IN THE
WATERS OR WETLY"NDS OF MONROE COUNTY
1) Property owners name & mailing address 2) Date FOR DEPART' --ENT USE ONLY
Florida Dept. -of Transportation Resolution No.
Miami Regional Service Center 3) Phone number
401 N.W. 2nd Ave., Suite 590 Date:
Miami, F1 33128 (305) 377-5360
4) Contractor or agent's name, mailing address & phone number
Not available until awarding of contract. Will provide as soon as known.
5) Legal description of property:
Section 5
Township 66 S
Range 32 E
Key Vaca Cut Key Subdivision
Lot
Block
Street, road or mile marker Bridge
PERMIT
NO.
Volume of material: dredged/e.xcavated filled deposi=ed
Cost of Permit
13028 c.y. 15195 c.y. C.Y. C.Y.
waterward landward waterward waterward
of M.H.W. of 11.11.1q. of M.H.W. of
Estia:ated cost of Construction
ZONING -.RU-1 to northwest of existing Vaca Cut Bridge; BU-2 and RU-3 to the southwest;
RU-1 to the northeast and RU-3 to the southeast.
PURPOSE - Dredging to provide navigational safety.
Approved by _
e
Chairman
BOARD OF COUNTY CO`I-MISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Biologist Comments - Restrictions or Special Conditions if any:
"Approval"
Cony in File
Build in- Ott icia
Date
�i�n�yturc r,�- d�>> 1canL ar et bate
[+_or Department Use Only1