Loading...
Resolution 297-1981RESOLUTION NO. 297 -1981 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, has received an application from PARMELEE ESTATE and, WHEREAS, in compliance with State Statute, it is necessary as part of the permitting procedure to read the following Biological Assessment into the Record, as follows: The applicant proposes to place 10,500 cubic yards along and area purported to have been eroded by hurricane Betsy as per his diaaram accompanying his application. The fill will be placed by dumptruck and bulldozer. Biophysical features of general area (include comments concerning extent of development of adjoining properties). The area was cleared and filled in 1963 adn 1964. Australian Pines and palm trees were planted throughout the property. One (1) house has been erected on the property. To the west exists Port Antigua, a single-family residential canal subdivision with approximately 5% of the lots occupied. To the South exists another single-family residential canal subdivision with approximately 60-70% of the lots occupied. Matecumbe Bight surrounding the applicant's property is around -6' to -7' deep offshore. Nearshore the depth is reduced to -1' to -2'. Biophysical features of specific work site and spoil site when appropriate (include identification of bottom types). The shoreline along the project area appears to be over five (5) years old. The boulder riprap line was placed (according to Bruce Jetter, Game & Fish Commission) "on or about April 10, 1970." Upland vegetation is not indigenous, being either Australian pine or coconut palm. The boulder riprap line has been well vegetated by red, green, and brown algae, including Laurencia spp., Dictyote spp., Batophora spp., and Acetabularia spp. Coelenterates, sponges, mollusks, and other marine organisms utilize the rip - rap along with a multitude of fish. The area between the shoreline and riprap has become colonized by Thalassia spp. and Halodule spp. along with Penicillus spp., Acetabularia spp., Batophora spp., Udotea spp., Dictyota spp., and Halimeda spp. This vegetation stabilized shifting sediments, increases dissolved oxygen through photosynthesis and provi.des habitat for a multitude of marine organisms such as mollusks, shrimp, polychaetes, crabs fish, tunicates and coelenterates. The substrate in this area consists of shell fragments with fine marl sediments. Impacts of project on bioloigcal resources. Address long-term impact as well as immediate impact. All aspects of proposal should be assessed in these terms. The immediate impact of the proposed filling to reclaim land would be to elimi- nate a biologically productive area of baybottom behind the boulder riprap/ Long-term impact would manifest itself through the loss of shallow productive baybottom. Loss of shallow water habitat is a cumulative effect resulting in a possible decrease of marine vertebrate and invertebrate species. It also increases the possibility of water quality degradation throught the elimination of grass flats which stabilize sediments and increase dissolved oxygen to the immediate area. Recommendation with justification concerning application. Include references to statute, administrative rule, etc. I would recommend denial of this project stating 17-3.02 and 17-3.05. PARMELEE ESTATE Fill application Page 2 Suggestions concerning modifications to reduce or minimize impact where appropriate. (A) Straighten the existing shoreline to eliminate pockets where debris may accumulate. (B) Eliminate filling to the boulder riprap line. (C) For further information, see may reports dated September 22, 1975, and February 10, 1976. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the above Biological Assessment has been read into the record and duly considered pursuant to Florida Statute 253.124 by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, this day of meeting. (Seal) 19th October , 19 81 at a regularly scheduled BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND QAL S(I JNCV ZBYA 4 r AswnsO 3= 2 BOARD OF -COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1 Curt Bait, District 2 3 OFFICE OF. Henry F. Weinkam, Director Building, Planning & Zoning MayorProtem Jerry Hernandez, Jr., District , �1 P.o. aox Room 2 0 5 Wing II MAYOR George E. Dolezal, District 4 Ken Sorensen, District 5��;r * Public Service Building Stock Island, Florida 33040 ►"x OUNTY o MONROE KEY WEST, FLORIDA33040 (305) 294-4641 Monroe County Legal Department Key West, Florida 33040 I, the undersigned, do hereby attest that all date and information is complete in the package of the applicant as follows: Certificate of Complete Enclosures 1/ 1. Resolution 2. Permit 3. Application for Permit 4. Site Plan 5. Location Map 6. County Biologist Report 7. DER Assessment DATE ! —0 OCT 8 1981 COUNTY ATTY. MONROE PLANNING, BUILDI?IG & ZONING DEPARTMENT PERMIT PErZMIT FOR EXCAVATION, THE DEPOSIT OF NO. COUNTY\�f FILL, OR STRUCTURAL ACTIVITIES IN THE WATERS OR WETLANDS OF MONROE COUNTY 1) Property owners name & mailing address 2) Date FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Sept. 8, 1981 L. Allan Sankpill, Executor resolution No. Post Office Box 1237 3) Phon number Kansan City, Missouri 64108 (816) 842-8500 Date: 4) Contra-ctor or agent's name, mailing address & phone number William J. Roberts Post Office Box 1386 Tallahassee, Florida 904/224-5169 S) Legal description of property: Part of Section 21 Kev Lower Matecumbe Subdivision Township 64S Lot Block Range 36E Street, road or mile marker Volume of material: dredged/excavated filled deposited c.y. c.y. 10,500 c.y. c.y. waterward landward waterward landward of M.H.W. of 1I.H.W. of M.H.W. of M.H.W. ZONING: GU PURPOSE: Cost of Per-mit Estimated cost of Construction Approved by Chairman BOARD .OF COUNTY C0i DII S S IONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA Biologist Comments - Restrictions or Special Conditions if any: APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Filter fabric to be placed in between the riprap boulders to control and prevent erosion. 2. Backslope the fill away from the rip -rap. 3. Construct the rip -rap wall first and then backfill to reduce trubidity. 4. Use turbidity screens. Cony in File Date BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Wilneimir;a Harvey, District 1 Curt Blair, District 2 Mayor Protem Jerry Hernandez, Jr., District 3 MAYOR George E. Dolezal, District 4 Ken Sorensen, District 5 OUNTY o MONROE y KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040 (305) 294-4641 October 5, 1981 Howard M. Post 158 Harbor Drive Tavernier, Florida 33070 Reference: Parmelee Estate, fill application. Dear Mr. Post: KOQErtDFDennis County Biologist P.o. Box Room 205 Wing II Public,Service Buildings 5825 Jr. College Rd. W. ;Key West, Florida e 33040-4399 .n do Mr. Weinkam has asked that I write you regarding your letter of 28 September 1981 and bring you up to date on the progress of this application. On 21 September 1981, I conducted an onsite inspection of the subject project accompanied by Mrs. Ikerd. Later in the week, I requested (and have since received) a copy of the Department of Environmental Regulation bio-report which must be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. I am now preparing my report for the Commission and expect to have it ready for their 19 October 1981 meeting: You may wish to call Mrs. Lorraine Rogers (294-4641, extension 100) around 15 October to confirm that this item has been agended. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to write or call me (294-8426, extension 134). Sincerely, Robert Dennis Environmental Biologist RD:mmp cc: Henry F. Weinkam, Director 158 Harbor Drive Tavernier, Florida 33070 Monday, September 28, 1981 Mr. Henry Weinkam, Director Monroe County Planning, Building and Zoning Department Key West, Florida Dear Mr. Wei nkam: On Monday, September 14, I delivered to you and Mr. Dennis the Fill Applica- tion from Mr. Allen Sankpill, Executor of the Parmelee Estate, for proposed work to be done on the Parmelee Estate property on Lower Matecumbe. I have noted since then that I had failed to include a copy of the letter authoriz- ing Mr. William J. Roberts to act as agent for Mr. Sankpill (Item #4 of the Application), and I, therefore, enclose a copy herewith. The caretaker of the property, Mrs. Mary Ikerd (664-4621) advises that Mr. Dennis has not yet visited the site, although he said he expected to be there last week. In any event, I would appreciate being advised as to the date when you think the matter can be on the Commission Agenda, because travel plans are involved; I will call you the latter part of this week. With best wishes, I remain Sincerely, i,I ed Howard M. Post HM P /md Encl: Photo copy, Power of Attorney cc: Mr. Allen Sankpill Mr. Wm. J. Roberts POWER OF ATTORNEY TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The undersigned hereby authorizes the law firm of ROBERTS, EGAN & ROUTA, P.A., including any of that firm's attorney employees, to act on their behalf in securing any and all necessary authorizations and/or permits to perform work on or adjacent to their ownership in Monroe County, Florida. r V SEAL Sworn to and subscribed before me this 14th day of aeZ±a r,ber 1981 , in the County of Jackson State of Missouri NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: C . F. VA!Tr NOTARY PUU!C 57.1,',C• OF /.11SSGURI CO . Mt COMM ISS10H E:11-In2S i P,'.IL 20 1735 I-oP' :� 1� .. Itl_; Tali: Oc 1 j OR CTt?t' '—M. CLUNtY ACT- : IT i : INlri nT?:TiS (iR ?vi i,..1:;11 OF fir!, ,p(r[: DaLk! property I � E',i rae part.' wners na-e S 7,14 i j Alk L, .6S/a/e cf A/{reel F Patine%e L,�ccrr-eci 12' 7 j Contractor or a,^,enc's dame, r:niLinn ad(!regs, phone & certification numl �%af : k/i//n,,r� ✓. ,two � errs- T / 0�,�22� -�/�� P o. eex /366 :cscrLntion of nroperty: �- /� , Sect' -on, �i Rey, �Gy-�/ c e�••�Le Suh(livi:i( - ?flock, Rance, tea,' Street, road or mile marker, —` (If acrear,e) Descrir.re the propose(i actin Ltv, methods of constriction & amount of tn:itt,rt.r (in cubic ,ards), to lie excavnted or d.ischarr,ed i%scrib e purpose & i_n11vn [, use of project. To el-rhiler Zel � frac4 al)H �->/ace df sxi�/i;� ti// u//ine n> <7/> area fee/ /oof 1>efween ocr.>cyroa feet a/// /o d eloped Gc Zhurric�rnes er s/orms �oa/nbi/:e /oca /ran -0/ era iiJaf A,/. 1,V /ii>er "v s ` U or. p/q�/W4rr/ co�.'P ©{ �// w>/ii ado�rior>o/ fJou%a' r �iPr-c�/o. �-be li/`f4<<r 4ei-�O:' �o/iofv� +.red ^ed/excavatcd filled/deposited olume of material: c y. c y. /0500r c v, ( . o3� 'i�'>=T 1.i � ci t �[TT tf c�'T r ci d' + . {T d-- f i 11 "lame, address & zip code of adjoining property owners whose property affr— : water way. 11o/ nF�/cq(/e / .:ems accorl7Pai>c//r7� ae✓'rQ/P%lofoo'. a) List ot'ler permits issued . , include applicant this site true G/n b) IF application lies been ,rrhriitted for this project (or one similar) 1 1 pa^t, explain reason for lie'4 appiication�and rive applicant's name if different from current applicant. o //o loui�ll P rn7iY- ✓Vas ev_.� n,�v 1:y ori�i.;o;` c��/cam-i>T .�'. ��or/�;4/ee� crow dere17.Ced; --5�e �yecU/<r o/ f4/l e date /S xce.Fii) q 7/0: Lo/Y7�/L1 h/ifij : o// efi ii,� re9u/ troi7✓ ni><J desires {o YO/A" ii> 14e occom�bi��>i>/r docui»PiifS� qqd t!>>�/5 sceEo v Peri»/r fron> it%r>rac Cw.>/7. L-st all Fec+eral and :Mate ay,encies that have received .applications for .;,. Thi--, completed ipplicition form will be accompanied by the following, or it will NOT Be oroc.essed. „KJ Two (2) sets of drawings, on 8� x 11 paper, showing location, plot plan, top view and cross section of proposal, drawn to scale. xe OGAP al>d drarvnJ9�. b) Application processing fee as follows:. —$25.00 for dredge, fill, docks OR any structures affronting natural water bodies. $10.M for vertical seawalls on macs-mAde bodies of water. $25.00 for any combination of the :above activities per site. Application is hereby made for a permit to authorize the :activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this npplic•ition, and to the best of my knowledge lx belief such information is true, complete & .Iccurit2. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. All provisions of laws and ordir•inceG governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give Authority to violate or cancel the Provisions of Any county, state Or federal law regulating construction or rerformnnce.of construction of this type of facility. r rurr _ - -- ror Department 1!se Only/ ['cc & reccipt Approved by Al s t. Director Pc`son ac_c.rrr_iR npiicatior (.o;C o� p,ri1 C .stair tc cos o conaL ,T77 rT^' � � ,# �' � � +• ' ;� � b '"`fit t � . �, ��+ �' ,�`�� �►'� �•� �� eta ti* 3. f, ,,,,, ��,, ��.•# } ALL} ` ' �`� � �+ x ` � �r�Y� *� � L. it a";�,;:� ,,;� � ,.y �� +,. �`: •7t� � t mr a- pr, T�� t _ ' Z -�' • +T,�,llMy_. .-;ice" .aY'sya �, � r 2^�-..Y; , .{ i � v yy_� �.'. ,y, £'wf,� 7Y.!^M'^R��i?'�*�..}��i ..a; � � �.�W,t,➢. ' r! �- r. ' i.,,j�„`a �� .. 'q 0 po 2 1 Ar. "c 16 ff 9 L 7 ( 97 4 A ' " 7"1.— N % 6 10 Na 0 FL OT;c? 11 DA, 8 4 7 7 Indian K. a % A .3 i H ram' u PROTECT LAC 7 A-71 OQ, '0s -� f" 2 9 4 8 9 -1" '5 1 ' �O Q . . - 4 A-F 2- 9 9 14 Io O FIR ASOC 1 6 C:o -- �C,l 4 `�-17 dt99 10 A4,ct.0 9 f) voff e q 9 1 'n9 3 gr 5 6 u 10 9 10 6 19 3 10 j;4 G'5 z 21 VAIN 6.ti 9 --TIt -- %� - I� REE 7 Ong Key . j FIR 4,.< 16H'2 2C 10 10) 22 21 IQ 20 ?2 20 X.y Snug. 7 20 21 4;4 o Oc. CD; 9 22 CK) 's FA r-) A T-Y M E L E --J E i i - ------ - - 7, `T - Olo -7 r , rl O -770 ���EX15T-It�G SNOrZELI,�:c EX! S T-,6 1307' SFC-Ff0 tti NTS FL- O 21.D A i3 A. V , A. G , RIP- RAP{ CLAN i 1 Fm.�--_ ---, I �vRpoSC: TZECLAtM EROL!) LLD LAND 7�'I?O1�G?Sc C j SILL i bA s'UM : M EANt SEA 1,D AC EN T�ROF'E2T�f OWhlEF�S: 1-1 1==;-O T:�Aci rVORF2lS C. �O KEN S GAR r-) N CAR 2"SLA N10r2AD.=� .NOT ON P�AN� C0UklTY Or,: D'D `A l `;OTE'- A}�F>ROX ICJ,soo CU. YD f1F`Y- _i�A ! ,.t r3Y A.F PARM =LEA ��, i O, L-EA�.t UPLANL> ILL, T-0BE- (JSED SN` E7-Z Or= 2 TOPS. Cn F... 3397 uTNo in u. s..: DEPARTMENTAL "*0R? `-=0NDE.NCZ DATE October 7, 1981 SUBJECT Parmelee Estate, Fill Application To N .r F Weinkam, Director DEP.T Building Planning and Zoning FROM Robert Dennis County Biolooist 4ei DEP.T Plannino and Zoning LEGAL Township 64 S, Range 36 East, Section 21, Lower Matecumbe Key. Zoned GU. INTORDUCTION This application is to be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with Chapter 19-111 (a) (5) of the Monroe County Code. DISCUSSION: Applicant proposes to reclaim an area approximately 1650 feet long and varying in width from 0 to 100 feet that was reportedly eroded away by two + hurricanes (Betsy and Donna). The amount of fill required would be 10,500- cubic yard,all of which would be placed below the MHW line out to a line of existing rip -rap. Also proposed is the placement of additional rip -rap at this existing structure. The submerged area to be filled consists of dense beds of seagrass (Thalassia and Halidule) and a myriad collection of animals making for a very biologically productive bottom (see DER report). This has apparently re- sulted because of the protection afforded by the rip -rap from waves. EVALUATION: The major environmental concern is the loss of the seagrass and its associated animal life. Ordinarily this amount of destruction should be avoided, however, it is recognized that there may be legal precedence re- garding reclaimation of eroded land. In any event, even if the applicants were required to stabilize their existing shoreline they would probably want to use the rip -rap already present. Removing this rip -rap would result in the loss of its use as a protective barrier and thereby allowing possible impacts to the seagrass bed from wave action. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with the following conditions: 1. Filter fabric to be Placed in bet-e en the rip -rap boulders to control and prevent erosion. 2. Backslope the fill away frori the rip -rap. 3. Construct the rip -rap wall first and then backfill to reduce turbidity. 4. Use turbidity screens. NOTES: Army Corps and DER permits obtained. PERMIT APP'-ICATION APPRAISAL A. On -site inspection: Yes X No /LAST Date Of/Inspection: Januarv, 1976 By: CHUCK SCMqEPEL File Permit Application INIo. 44-10-3427 Dated. June 27, 197 If revised, date of rovision: Notice No. Applicant's Name and Address: Alfred F. Parmelee 1535 Walnut St.' Kansas City, Missouri 46108 Location of work: Section 21 Township Monroe County Geographic location, local references, etc. Lower Matecumbe Key, North of Port Antigua Water Classificati6n of project area _III Water Classification of Adjacent waters TTT Purpose of work: Reclamation of _10,500 cu. yds. of property Water dependent: Yes X No 1. Description of proposed project and construction techniques. (Include quantification of amour" to which project extends into wetlands and/or waterward of the apparent mean high water line•.) The applicant proposes to place 10,500 cubic yards along an area purported to have been eroded by hurricane Betsy as per his diagram accompanying his application. The fill will be placed by dLunptruck and bulldozer. 2. Biophysical features of general area (include comments concerning extent of development of adjoining properties). The area was cleared and filled in 1963 and 1964. Australian Pines and palm trees were planted throughout the property. One (1) house has been erected on the property. To the west exists Port Antigua, a single-family residential canal subdivision with approximately 5% of the lots occupied. To the South exists another, single-family residential canal Subdivision with approximately 60-70% of the lots occupied. Matecumbe Bight surrounding the applicant's property is around -61 to -71 deep offshore. Nearshore, the depth is reduced to -11 to -21. � a 3. Biophysical features of specific work site and spoil site when appropriate (include identification of bottom types). The shoreline along the project area appears to be over five (5) years old. The boulder riprap line was placed (according to Bruce Jetter, Game & Fish Commission) on or about April 10, indigenous, being either Australiaci 1970." Upland vegetation is not - pine or coconut palm. The boulder riprap line has been well vegetated by red, green, and brown algae, including Laurencia spp., Dictyote spp., BaL-ophora spp., and Acetabularia spp. oe en era es, sponges, mollusks, and other sessile marine organisms utilize the riprap along with a multitude of fish. The area between the shoreline and riprap has become colonized by Thalassia spp. and Halodule spp. along with Penicillus spp., Acetabularia spp., Batophora spp., Udotea spp., Dictyota spp. and Halimeda spp. This vegetation stabilizes shifting sediments, increases dissolved oxygen through photosynthesis and provides habitat for a multitude of marine organisms such as mollusks, shrimp, polychaetes, crabs, fish, tunicates and coelenterates. The substrate in this area consists of shell fragments with fine marl sediments. 4. Impact*of project on biological resources. Address long-term impact as well as immediate impact. All aspects of proposal should be assessed in these terms. The immediate impact of the proposed filling to reclaim land would be to eliminate a biologically productive area of baybottom behind the boulder riprap. Long-term impact would manifest itself through the loss of shallow productive baybottom. Loss of shallow water habitat is a cumulative effect resulting in a possible decrease of marine vertebrate and invertebrate species. .It also increases the possibility of water quality degradation through the elimination of grass flats which stabilize sediments and increase dissolved oxygen to the immediate area. 5. Recommendation with justification concerning application. Include references to statute, administrative rule, etc. I would recommend denial of this project stating 17-3.02 and 17-3.05.•, 6. Suggestions concerning modifications to reduce or minimize i-l"Pact where appropriate. (A) Straighten the existing shoreline to eliminate pockets where debris may accumulate. (B) Eliminate filling to the boulder riprap line. (C) For further information, see my reports dated September 22, 1975 and February 10, 1976. = CONSTRUCTION ANDIOPERATION CONSEQUENCES P 1. Project construction may result in increased rates of eutro- phication in nearby bodies of waters. 2. Project construction may reduce the capacity of receiving bodica of water for shellfish }propagation or for recreational or commercial harvesting of shellfish. y 3. Project construction may reduce the capability of habitat to support a well balanced fish and wildlife population. X Project construction may interfere with the ability of habitat to support successful fish and wildlife propagation. 5. Project construction may impair the management or feasibility of management of fish and wildlife resources. X 6. Project construction may result in degradation of local water quality by reducing or eliminating the capacity of wetland vegetation for filtration and/or for nutrient stabilization or transformation. 7. Discharged substances attributable to the project may settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable sludge deposits. 8. Floating debris, oil scum, and other floating materials, attributable'to the project may be in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious. X 9. Materials discharged from the project may be in such degrees to create a nuisance. X 10. Discharge substances attributable to the project may be in such concentrations or combinations which may be toxic or harmful to humans, animals, or plant life. 11. Chlorides.°may exceed 250 mg/1 in bodies of freshwater. 12. Chlorides may exceed 250 mg/1 in groundwater due to reduced amounts of percolation because of increased surface runoff rates. 13. Chlorides will be increased more than 10% above normal in waters of a brackish or saline nature. 14. Copper residues may exceed 0.5 mg/l. 15. Zinc residues may exceed 1.0 mg/l. 16. Chromium residues may exceed 0.50 mg/l hexavalent or 1.0 mg/1 total chromium in effluent -discharge or may exceed 0.05 mg/1 after reasonable mixing in the receiving waters. 17. Phenolic type compounds calculated or reported as prsnol may exceed 0.001 mg/l. 18. Lead may exceed 0.05 m9/1. 19. Iron may exceed 0.30 mg/l. 20. Arsenic may exceed 0•.05 mg/l. 21. Oils and greases may exceed 15 mg/l or visible oil, defined as iridescense, may be present to cause taste and odors, or may interfere with other beneficial uses. X 22. Turbidities may exceed 50 JTU as related to standard candle turbidimeter above background. X 23.' Dissolved oxygen may be artificially depressed below the values of 5 ppm. ---�-.... i i r 24. Biological oxygen demand may exceed values which would cause dissolved oxygen to be depressed below 5 ppm or biologi- cal oxygen demand will be great enough to produce nuisance conditions. 25. Dissolved solids may exceed 500 mg/l as a monthly average or exceed 1000 mg/l at any time. 26. Specific conductance may be increased more than 100% above background levels or exceed 500 micromhos/cm for fresh water streams. 27. Cyanide or cyanates may be detectable in receiving bodies of water. 28. The pH receiving -waters may be caused to vary more than one unit above or below normal pH of the waters, or: 29. Lower pH value may be less than 6.0 30. Upper pH value will be more than 8.5 31. Detergent levels in receiving bodies of water may exceed 0.5 mg/l �32. Mercury may be detectable in receiving bodies of water. 33.. Coliform counts may exceed criteria established under Chapter 17-3, Florida Statutes, for the existing water classification in the project area. If certification is approved or waived, PL92-500 requires that effluent limitations be specified as part of the certification. When applicable, please specify: 1. Monitoring required by the applicant (include frequency) NOT APPLICABLE. 2. Effluent limitations (i.e., those limitations established under 17.3 for particular water classifications as well as water quality standards.) Include specifics. NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPROVED. Recommendations for water quality control during construction. NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPROVED. SIGNATURE: j, '' ? �•.�' ,.:,1, ,, CHUC DATE; March 21 1976