Ordinance 029-2004
ORDINANCE NO. 029 -2004
AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE YEAR 2010 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS, AND ADOPTING THE
LIVABLE COMMUNIKEYS MASTER PLAN FOR BIG PINE KEY AND
NO NAME KEY AS A PART OF THE 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES
INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES TO FORWARD A
CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on December 1 ih, the Monroe County
Board of County Commissioners adopted the Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan for Big Pine
Key and No Name Key (referred to hereafter as the Master Plan) as the policy document to direct
growth and development on Big Pine Key and No Name Key; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan is the product of the Livable CommuniKeys program as
outlined in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan Objective 101.20 which is to
address community needs while balancing the needs of all of Monroe County; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan was created in conjunction with the Habitat Conservation
Plan (HCP), a mechanism required by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) whereby the
concerns and responsibilities of the various public agencies with regard to the conservation of the
Key Deer and other covered species, and public and private development of Big Pine and No
Name Keys can be coordinated; and
WHEREAS, many Objectives and Policies within the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan
specifically address the growth and development of Big Pine Key and No Name Key in order to
protect the endangered species; and
WHEREAS, the HCP and the LCP process set forth much more comprehensive
conservation and development plans that will allow development on the island and protection of
the endangered species on the island; and
WHEREAS, many ofthe findings of both the HCP and the LCP conflict with Policies in
the Year 2010 Plan and the plans may not be implemented until those comprehensive plan
policies are amended; and
WHEREAS, many of the goals, strategies and action items within the Master Plan
address specific policies within the Comprehensive Plan by either replacing or changing them;
and
Page 1 of 11
Initial
WHEREAS, as a part of these amendments, the Master Plan will be adopted as a part of
the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore any conflicts between the two must be resolved; and
WHEREAS, the Strategies and Action Items in the Big Pine Key and Non Name Key
Master Plan are the equivalent to the Objectives and Policies in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, as a part of the comprehensive LCP process, Future Land Use Map
amendments are proposed to bring properties in conformity with the Master Plan and other
guiding documents; and
WHEREAS, all of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map changes
have been recommended by the Master Plan, as adopted on December 17th, 2003 and the
adoption resolution states that the Future Land Use and Land Use District map changes would be
brought before the commission at a subsequent hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were reviewed during a meeting of the
Development Review Committee on January 5, 2004 which was continued from December 29th,
2003; and
WHEREAS, during a regularly scheduled meeting on January 14, 2004, the Monroe
County Planning Commission reviewed the amendments and recommended approval, to the
Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners examined the
proposed amendments to the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map
submitted by the Monroe County Planning Department at a public hearing on January 21st, 2004
and approved a Transmittal Resolution to transmit the plan and map amendments to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA); and
WHEREAS,; the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) responded to the
County transmittal on June 29, 2004 in an Objection, Recommendations and Comments report
prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.01O; and
WHEREAS, during a regularly scheduled meeting on August 18, 2004, the Monroe
County Board of County Commissioners reviewed the report from DCA, and amendments
recommended by staff to the proposed 2010 Comprehensive Plan and the Big Pine Key and No
Name Key Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners were presented with
the following information, which by reference is hereby incorporated as part of the record of said
hearing:
1. Staff Report prepared on January 9, 2002; by K. Marlene Conaway, Director,
Planning and Environmental Resources;
Page 2 of 11
Initial
2. Objection, Recommendations and Comments report prepared by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA); dated June 29, 2004.
3. Staff Report in response to the DCA ORC dated July 20, 2004 by K. Marlene
Conaway, Director, Planning and Environmental Resources;
4, Proposed changes to the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan including
the Master Plan for Future Development for Big Pine Key and No Name Key and
amendments to the Future Land Use Map;
5. Comments by the public; and
WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners makes the following
Findings of Fact based on the evidence presented:
1. Objective 101.20 mandates the county to complete a series of master plan documents
to address local needs while balancing the needs of all of Monroe County. The Big
Pine Key and No Name Key Master Plan is the first of the Livable CommuniKeys
plans to be completed, and require implementation of the recommended Strategies
and Action Items. The LCP Plan itself must be adopted as an amendment to and a
part of the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Policy 101.20.2 will provide a
mechanism to recognize individual Master Plans as they are adopted by the BOCC as
a part of the Comprehensive Plan, enabling the framework created within the plans to
have the same standing as the Comprehensive plan; and
2. Objective 105.2.2 directs the County prepare over-lay maps designating geographic
areas of the County as one of three Tiers and incorporate the maps as an overlay to
the zoning maps with supporting text amendments. The maps will be submitted to the
Board of County Commissioners and DCA for approval upon final approval of this
Plan amendment.
3. In order to maintain consistency between the different planning documents that
pertain to Big Pine Key and No Name Key, the LCP Master Plan and the Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) must be included when considering future development,
both public and private. On page 34 of the LCP, it is recommended that Objective
103,1 of the Comprehensive Plan be amended; and
4. Because the LCP master plan and the Habitat Conservation Plan create a three-tier
system to direct growth to infill areas and away from areas that contain important
native vegetation, sources of funding needs to be identified to purchase
environmentally sensitive lands. The planning area contains a large amount of native
habitat that is valuable to many of the endangered species which live there, and in
order to permanently preserve it, it must be protected through public ownership. Page
60 of the master plan recommends encouraging the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) to find a dedicated funding source to acquire Tier I lands within the
planning area for preservation purposes; and
Page 3 of 11
Initial
5, Policy I 0 1.6.5 ranks proposed acquisition lands according to three priorities, however
it did not previously take into account the implementation of a Habitat Conservation
Plan such as the one which has been drafted for Big Pine Key and No Name Key.
Page 60 of the master plan recommends that consideration of implementing the HCP
should be a factor in the ranking of lands for acquisition purposes; and
6. Portions of the ROGO and NROGO system outlined in the Year 2010 Comprehensive
Plan specifically mention Big Pine Key and No Name Key as areas which should
receive additional negative points in both ROGO and NROGO. Because the master
plan adopts a new ROGO system for only Big Pine and No Name Keys, those areas
should be exempted from the current ROGO system; and
7. Policy 103.1.1 includes many elements that are replaced with the implementation of
the LCP master plan, including a new limit on ROGO allocations to 10 per year for
the next 20 years and the corresponding amount of non-residential floor area. The
new ROGO system for Big Pine is described in Strategy 3.1 and Strategy 3.2 of the
master plan and will be unique to the planning area. Non-residential floor area is
limited to 47,800 square feet by Action Item 4.1.1 in the master plan which
corresponds to 239 square feet for each residence planned for the next twenty years.
The limit on vehicular trips set forth in Policy 103.1.1 is reflected in Action Item
4,1.8 which prohibits any new high intensity uses, which have corresponding trip
generation rates to those prohibited in Policy 103.1.1 (they generate more than 100
trips per 1000 square feet per day); and
8. Policy 103.1.2 directs the county to replace the ACCC (Area of Critical County
Concern) designation with zoning designations consistent with the categories shown
on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Each of these changes are outlined in Action
Item 2.1.3 which also specifically states that Policy 103.1.2 should be deleted. These
changes will be reflected in a new zoning map to be adopted by the BOCC; and
9. Policy 103.1.7 requires the county to initiate a land management program with other
government agencies for private and county owned lands within and adjacent to state
and federal owned conservation projects. Strategy 10.2 and the associated action
items outline a program for lands acquired for conservation purposes by the county in
order to fulfill the mandates set forth in the HCP which require a 3:1 mitigation to
development ratio. The action items include offering lands acquired for conservation
to the FWS for management, formulating management objectives for specific
habitats, restoration of lands to improve Key deer habitat, and reporting as required
by the HCP; and
10. Policy 103,1.8 requires that upon the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the
Habitat Evaluation Index (HEI) in the Land Development Regulations shall be
revised to incorporate greater consideration for the habitat of species of special status,
including the Key deer. The required changes have been completed and were adopted
as a part of the LDR's in 1999 and will not be affected by the LCP master plan; and
Page 4 of 11
Initial
11. Policy 103.1.9 mandates that the county revise the Land Development Regulations to
require the 'clustering' of development to avoid the fragmentation of Key deer
habitat. This requirement has been fulfilled and clustering is required under Section
9.5-345(f) of the LDRs. Clustering is supported within the master plan through limits
placed on development in Tier I lands; and
12. The HCP modeled the development of new and expanded public facilities on Big
Pine and found that if existing use were to expand and new uses were to be placed in
scarified, Tier III areas there would be little or no impact to the endangered species
overall, and the impact that would occur could be minimized and mitigated. Policy
103.1.10 requires a siting analysis for any new or significant expansion of public
facilities on Big Pine which is to include:
1. assessment of needs;
2. evaluation of alternative sites and design alternatives for the selected sites; and
3. assessment of impacts on surrounding land uses and natural resources.
All three of these requirements have been met as a part of the HCP and LCP process
and both documents explain where any new public facilities should be placed, Public
facilities are directly addressed in Goal 6 (parks and recreation) and Goal 7 (other
public facilities); and
13. One of the reasons the HCP was developed as part of a solution to relieve localized
traffic constraints on Big Pine. Some improvements have been made by FDOT to
U.S. 1 through Big Pine, including an intersection improvement project and re-timing
of the traffic signal, and a proposed third lane will be completed after adoption of the
HCP. Policy 103.1.11 requires the implementation of certain projects and the
consideration of solutions to the traffic problem by FDOT, which will be completed
after adoption of the HCP; and
14. As a direct result of the HCP process, permanent traffic solutions have been
addressed through the HCP analysis. Impacts have been addressed and many of the
suggested projects are either completed or will be completed when the HCP is
approved by USFWS. Results of the HCP process include the at-grade fencing along
U. S. 1, Key deer underpasses, and the extension of the third lane on the west end of
the island. Policy 103.1.12 requires a study to evaluate the different options for
traffic circulation concurrency issues, which was part of the purpose of the HCP and
the recommendations are included in the LCP as a part of Goal 15; and
15, Policy 103.1.14 discourages tour groups on Big Pine in order to reduce the traffic and
illegal feeding of the Key deer population. The language of this policy is reflected in
Action Item 12.1.5; and
Page 5 of 11
Initial
16. Policy 103.1.15 requires the county to restore, where practicable, disturbed wetland
and upland native vegetation in order to improve Key deer habitat. The policy has
been duplicated in Action Item 10.2.6; and
17. Policy 207.7.5 requires the county to identify the freshwater lens system on Big Pine
and the associated keys and implement special measures to protect the system. Goal
11 specifically addresses the freshwater system and proposes protective mechanisms,
most of which are already in place; and
18. Policy 207,7 is similar to Policy 103,1.14 which discourages tour groups on Big Pine
Key. This policy is addressed in Action Item 12.1.5; and
19. Policy 207.7.9 states that "Monroe County shall incorporate specific management
guidelines to protect Key deer (developed pursuant to Policy 207.2,3) as stipulations
for land development orders for all development occurring on Big Pine and No Name
Keys". Specific guidelines are outlined in both the HCP and the LCP for all
development, not just development orders, on Big Pine and No Name Keys. Both
documents describe a level of development that minimizes impacts on endangered
species and requires mitigation where impacts do occur; and
20. Policy 207.7.1 0 requires the county to adopt revisions to the LDRs which limit the
area that may be enclosed by fencing so as not to interfere with Key deer movement.
The LDRs were amended and Big Pine and No Name Keys have special fencing
regulations described in Section 9.5-309(c); and
21. Both Policy 207.7.11 and Policy 207.7.17 require the county to work with the
USFWS to develop roadside management techniques to reduce deer-vehicle
collisions, illegal deer feeding, and increased visibility. Roadside management
techniques are required in Action Item 15.2.2 of the master plan; and
22. Both the HCP and the LCP encourage infill commercial development within the U.S.
1 corridor area on properties already scarified. The Future Land Use Map Change
from Residential Conservation (RC) to Mixed Use Commercial (MC) of the
properties described as Lots 21 and 22, Tropic Island Ranchettes is consistent with
the Master Plan because the properties are scarified, have been used commercially
since 1986, and are within the U.S, 1 corridor area, where development and
redevelopment are directed and encouraged.
23. The HCP and the LCP require and provide mechanisms for the protection of the
habitat of endangered species, Part of this protection is the designation of areas in
Tier I which are to remain undeveloped or developed at the current level of
development. The properties currently designated on the Future Land Use Map as
Mixed Use Commercial (MC) are only partially developed with residential uses,
contain a large amount of native habitat, are located within Tier I, and are not within
the main U.S. 1 corridor where further commercial development may occur. The
properties to the south of the MC site are under public ownership, while properties to
Page 6 of 11
Initial
the north are single family residences with the FLUM designation of Residential Low
(RL).
WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners makes the following
Conclusions of Law based on the evidence presented:
1. The Livable CommuniKeys Program requires Monroe County to produce a series of
Master Plans which addresses local needs while balancing the needs of all of Monroe
County; and
2. The LCP Master Plan for Big Pine Key and No Name Key was created in conjunction
with the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and implements the HCP, both of which
control development and conservation on the islands; and
3. The Master Plan is adopted as an amendment to the 2010 Comprehensive Plan and is
the policy document to direct growth and development on Big Pine Key and No
Name Key; and
4. The Master Plan, as adopted, recommends the amendments to the 2010
Comprehensive Plan proposed by this ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with
existing Objectives and Policies and to enable the implementation of both the HCP
and the LCP; and
5. The proposed amendments are internally consistent with and further the Goals,
Objectives, and Policies of the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan and the Principals of
Guiding Development set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners hereby supports the
decision of the Monroe County Planning Commission and the staff of the Monroe County
Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners that
the following amendment to the Monroe County Code be approved, adopted and transmitted to
the state land planning agency for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. The Master Plan for Future Development of Big Pine Key and No Name Key
is approved as an amendment to, and incorporated into the Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive
Plan.
Section 2.
to read as follows:
Create Policy 101.20.2 in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan
Page 7 of 11
Initial
Policy 101.20.2
The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 20 I 0 Comprehensive Plan as
a part of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following
Community Master Plans have been completed in accordance with the principals outlined
in this section and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Master Plan for Future Development of Big Pine Key and No Name Key, dated
August 2004 and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on August 18, 2004 is
incorporated by reference into the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The term Strategies in the
Master Plan is equivalent to the term Objectives in the Comprehensive Plan and the term
Action Item is equivalent to the term Policy; the meanings and requirements for
implementation are synonymous.
Section 3. Amend Objective 103.1 of the Year 2010 Monroe County Comprehensive
Plan as follows (additions and deletions shown in underline and strikethrough format):
Objective 103.1
Monroe County shall regulate future development and coordinate the provision of public
facilities on Big Pine Key and No Name Key, consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and
Policies of this Comprehensive Plan,_ the Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan and the
Habitat Conservation Plan, for Big Pine Key and No Name Key in order to:
(a) protect the Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium);
(b) preserve and enhance the habitat of the Key deer;
(c) limit the number of additional vehicular trips from other islands to Big Pine Key;
(d) maintain the rural, suburban, and open space character of Big Pine Key; and
(e) prevent and reduce adverse secondary and cumulative impacts on Key Deer.
[9J-5.006(3)(b)1 and 4]
Section 4. Amend Policy 101.6.4 of the Year 2010 Monroe County Comprehensive
Plan as follows (additions and deletions shown in underline and strikethrough format):
Policy 101.6.4
The County will coordinate with DCA to ensure that DCA continues to support enhanced land
acquisition efforts in the Keys based on needs identified in this comprehensive plan. This
coordination shall ensure continued support of state acquisition efforts under CARL,
Preservation 2000 and the Florida Communities Trust programs, The COtUlty encourages the
Department to work at the state level to create a dedicated acquisition fund for Tier I lands on
Big Pine Key and No Name Key based on the results of the Carrying Capacity Study, the
requirements of the incidental take permit and Habitat Conservation Plan and the Master Plan
for Big Pine Key and No Name Key. The County and the Department will also support
appropriate legislative changes which will have the effect of enhancing the Land Authority
efforts throughout the County, and the South Florida Water Management District's
acquisitions on Big Pine Key. Similarly, cooperation will continue with private acquisition
efforts, such as The Nature Conservancy and the Florida Land and Sea Trust.
Page 8 of 11
Initial
Section 4. Amend Policy 101.6.5 of the Year 2010 Monroe County Comprehensive
Plan as follows (additions and deletions shown in underline and strikethrough format):
Policy 101.6.5
Monroe County shall annually compile a list prioritizing the lands requested for County
acquisition due to the Permit Allocation System. The lands of the property owners who meet
the criteria in Policy 101.6.1 shall be ranked according to:
1. the environmental sensitivity of the vegetative habitat, marine resources, and impacts
to the quality of near shore waters as specified by the ranking in the Environmental
Design Criteria section of the Land Development Regulations;
2. whether the property is in known, probable, and/or potential habitat for one or more
threatened and/or endangered species, as indicated on the most recent Protected Animal
Maps; and
3. whether development on the property will adversely impact successful
implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan or protection and recovery of threatened
or endangered species, such as development on Big Pine Key, No Name Key, Ohio Key,
and North Key Largo.
Those lands considered most sensitive according to the combination of (a), (b), and (c).
above shall be ranked as the highest priority for acquisition.
Section 6. Create Policy 101.5.11 and 101. 5. 12 in the Monroe County Year 2010
Comprehensive Plan to read as follows:
Policy 101.5.11
Residential development on Big Pine Key and No Name Key will be subject to the
allocation system set forth in Strategy 3.2 of the Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan for
Big Pine Key and No Name Key. The Land Development Regulations will be amended
to include the point system as detailed in the Master Plan. Eligibility to compete within
the allocation system will be based on the location of the proposed development with
respect to the Tier System Overlay Map incorporated herein by reference.
Policy 101.5.12
Non-residential development on Big Pine Key and No Name Key will be allocated
pursuant to the following additional criteria:
1. Development must be infill in existing commercial areas in Tier 2 and Tier 3 lands,
mainly along the U.S. 1 corridor on Big Pine Key.
2. All new non-residential development will be limited to disturbed or scarified lands.
3. Allocation awards shall be allowed to exceed 2,500 square feet per site if located
within the designated Community Center Overlay as designated by Action Item 4.1.5.
4. New allocations shall be awarded moderate positive points to applicants who fulfill
the additional criterion set forth in Strategy 4.2 of the Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan
for Big Pine Key and No Name Key.
Page 9 of 11
Initial
All new non-residential development within the planning area shall be exempt from
criterion 5, 6, 7, and 17 of Policy 101.5.5. Development that is exempt from NROGO
will not be subject to criteria 1 through 4 above.
Section 6. Delete the following Policies from the Monroe County Year 2010
Comprehensive Plan: 103.1.1, 103.1.2, 103.1.7, 103.1.8, 103.1.9, 103.1.10, 103,1.11, 103,1.12,
103.1.14,103.1.15,207,7.5,207.7.7,207.7.9, 207.7.10, 207.7.11, and 207.7.17.
Section 7. Change the Future Land Use Map Designation of the properties from
Mixed Use Commercial (MC) to Residential Low (RL)with the following real estate numbers:
00110460,000000, 00110540.000000, 00110640.000000, 00110720.000000, 00110720.000100,
00110730.000000, 00110740.000000, 00110750.000000, 00111020.000000, 00111020,000010,
00111020.000020, 00111020.000030, 00111020.000040 and illustrated on the attached map
which is hereby incorporated by reference and attached as Exhibit 1.
Section 8. Change the Future Land Use Map Designation of the properties from
Residential Conservation (RL) to Mixed Use Commercial (MC) with the following real estate
numbers: 00111420.000100 and 00111420.000500 and illustrated on the attached map which is
hereby incorporated by reference and attached as Exhibit 2.
Section 9. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change, or provision of
this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such
validity,
Section 10. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are
hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict.
Section 11. This ordinance shall be transmitted by the Planning Department to the
Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Chapter 163 and 380, Florida Statutes.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
Page 10 of 11
Initial
Section 12. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of
Florida, but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the Department of Community
Affairs or Administrative Commission finding the amendment in compliance with Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County,
Florida at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of August 2004.
Mayor Murray Nelson
Mayor Pro Tern David P. Rice
Commissioner Dixie Spehar
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner Charles "Sonny" McCoy
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
(SEAL)
.>,,~'.\
'<\,:~,~
" \
''-11;
l
+'~-~~~7'.
,/:r
BY~~~
r ay elson -
ATTEST:PANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
~olv-LC-. ~~~
DEPUTY CLERK /
L~-r
I
:r:
o c
..,.. ~'..
:0 ' :.
c<~:'
nl
CO,:'
C::-C'
C::',::
;;r:: -;:,
.....()f"";:;:;.
:<:-l:r:
." )>
r- GJ
~ ,..,
Page 11 of 11
loi tial
"-:)
c:::,
c:::::.
.z:-
en
1"1"1
"
,
">
"
:z
~
_.~--;
~,--
i
rr,
o
-'1
C>
::0
::0
:"'11
(~
::::;
-.I
::1;)
1::J
•
EXHIBIT NO. 1 1��1
tWWI ...
x „ �i • + 'e�x ., 1 gz .� 1, .. ,� ..
y Y'7 5 s.$F d J Y a • °.
us,�� -„",, i T▪v- 'h
'htL C r x "
t +.'�'' �, ,4'! 't` *.'''as s 2 4 �-. _ - ° j
ice` 6-°,N 3 $ ,d x; , - d°�' A as = ,
•
�#. .7.� y P it'.3° _• y .,YE 44%, 3'n Y p _ 3 r'T : ` "
�e F, Y ,,, 11 -i}.i "'" �ebss }r aa1 }1f . • ..
t
g
m
-:.''z:,'j.';..
„.< , °,,v u' ›.• . . !St 1.t Y rsin,!',.^�„X, io'� ,'": a tf
•
#` } z .l �Y A 4�x iT di t�b 4 . ' w" -F
�>u' .+' y ',7 z�f3�' t b• t 2?"`Y` °s`6 Y"de z•,��y ys k,."_,+'t g
0-4
•a mr c r k .$n ; __°„ w S '}' s �1• a u r" tEsA � 'T'ro- r a ft }as nRa g n c F. k s 'y ;glk
�
ryA,
, .°3' � y .',�- zx _t .t- ,. rb� 4:1 { ^aac�.,9xGy, df , pt
S� : a a t a ^ec . ., 8 s ., y s+
t
} f ▪ F. �;}R a a 1 r .b z -' s s i� q rr�,p'"# e- } -.
BSt• F
-
Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment: Aerial
Key: Big Pine
14
Mile Marker: 32
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from MC to RL
Property Description: RE 110460, 110540, 110640, 110720,
110720.0001, 110730, 110740, 110750, 111020, 11020.0001, zoo
11020.0002, 11020.0003, 11020.0004 ��
Feet
Map Amendment#: M23063 Land Use District Map#: 332
EXHIBIT NO. 1
Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment: Street Map
Key: Big Pine
Mile Marker: 32
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from MC to RL
Property Description: RE 110460, 110540, 110640, 110720,
110720.0001,110730,110740,110750,111020,11020.0001,
11020.0002, 11020.0003, 11020.0004
Map Amendment #: M23063
Land Use District Map #: 332
EXHIBIT NO. 1
RL
Me to RL
The Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map is proposed to be amended as
indicated above and briefly described as:
Key: Big Pine
Mile Marker: 32
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from MC to RL
Property Description: RE 110460, 110540, 110640, 110720,
110720.0001, 110730, 110740, 110750, 111020, 11020.0001,
11020.0002, 11020.0003, 11020.0004
Map Amendment #: M23063
Land Use District Map #: 332
"
200
Feet
EXHIBIT NO. 2
Proposed Future land Use Map Amendment: Street Map
Key: Big Pine
Mile Marker: 30
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from RC to MC
Property Description: RE 111420.0001, 111420.0005
Map Amendment #: M23063
Land Use District Map #: 344
•
1, 1
EXHIBIT NO. 2
."' .•;r2—.u. € di t k�. ,... i 5; ..'. ° d ," ".a *r€'a6oae r-- •-• s,•=' ,- 1 y''A� . a..wsw �r .'!s-'.ate'
17; 4 1 ' "' t d a, .,1
. €.:. d .i ..Y, t.rr x '.a. z. , ?a?w.,sssr u i< v, t ',.r 'b. ,ca �x.'r ' 'f;. "`,i
:€ °' r x r . tea : s,
K V IV — . i1,T1t,,'.
yt cr R.� 't 'a'w' i € '3# -, c�- .j! A $ 1F
1 .1; ` i-4.„st .," 41
L'1 i, £ Yv< ,k:� 1 . fi x lta".Y '� .-N,`e � 4�y, R:..+k 3 5�"G2�7
' m� a 4 � ia�v k` a a ' ° ,i. .; a it,
k_
'' ;' "x'g eY< :;o y t $, l '3 >F rc:
has yy, r I[.
:- r .,_ s � air, tip , >.. e«ry
�aa .s0.��}�= `�si.eYs.z. x +. f... �'" ��r .� s �° � tr ax r: {a �� a. � '� a.s ��� �-�-
^i 'i „ zt. 'i'. .ib ,. s a: a Ai ' . •r• ! i p, `..
Nr'1 a� a r ''� i 3 e' yx r �` a . it i . . .. - • 11 1
fie, 8 .'S" F
. ;
s 7,i„
4,
g . t ; r .� ate. �G .. ...a..� 'a` ' � � ! � I n '1
i S�"� is € ,{ 1 $ � �i r�§'i
���,.� � 1 � �4,1,��1 �r, � I�iiw it �� � �� �1 � I s4 F �'fi i�'ffi �f �
ui
� u",„.1.f _m,t ^__i'+a�,., ,1'.1._�L° .it�.L', «,x a.,_:: it.-xR s-. pF 'ti .4"_ ,,.' (( E .✓€ +. w t >
�" ii,. ; ti P,1. I� i"" 1 r . -tt b I' 2-i j ` F .E s r t f s�
i, '1.7, 1; ,, 'km ir,;,.i.,41. ';',:a'i-'•
Ala _ y
.;�. ` �.., r i.� , H..��,l �i�,.. Ili-
a. 1L �1 ..t. �1��. J4..�k.:�le=a, i 11- t >� 't�''4 t�»a
¢T'46, .' `.,' i.. ��i�..a, -#- w ,.;g eft' . ,r :- e r ivii rii* ",r i P,ws � ' '
5 Fz7t p i „�. f4w s-it. li i<6 IA° .K.,.Alt....*%.,:iii:Iii;,;-t,,,,jo, 44 e ..mbri, F:t.:, PAT..', •,' it
q ,i._m ,a.a, b !!?' av"` ^s <-:' -.1;74*#' -•,`'...'46'ifri}1r14 - ..1 .i.:-11 'AL ei.„1„,.,4i.:,,,,,, A s'iltr-,l'''k'<i, hms'.11411fAlltAAJAA., -z......, ,,,,,mkr4 ., 'q', ,r,„,.:7,-1, -,,‘„tsi.11,t-47-,,,!:,:v ft:,,..,,,,2:74
i t
"3 :, ..fit, 0x =� t'
ri
'i{7t x 4:1 .r � li u: � 'fr , te' :::qA.','or.,,'''", 14 vrAff iipivt.ti a+ f..494,
z-yrs i�$� �.�#r � ,
PO:
,ot .1 jig i3,:i.• 1:a.`-,31,.`a .� ,rim. y 17t 141,%u ,,x a',z :: ,„„ y,. t
NE-
d ,�� � �L[ !t' . •
�� i17 iGJ a 9 �{! E p L° a 54..$t3�* 'rsx,.," °?. F ' 1 a
;h r'ia *' all a`,r: .u . '• � ';. 'S.' a "fit ... . '`, xi t:: i. & tt !`�i <
kR t `➢t"4' ?&__s. F.# 3 8' .,-.f,.`t... v .tt y 6 '�t r7v-iYT` 5 .flti .,
d `'^�
-fit'4%til'"
,ii
x r 'a { i g ia..: ..: 4 .. f i @ 1 d t:I'it: „ 'II iry....44 €. e - °av
. pi
,i t-,r . ', ! x i �' Ai ik"' jFb�;r� k t art �i' :z�x `.."
er
.. �_ a ,`.V40° _ y' _ter ,.,..�,aVaiii E .' �i. ,s u:. ?ice .. :.•a., ?''
Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment: Aerial
• Key: Big Pine
Mile Marker: 30
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from RC to MC
Property Description: RE 111420.0001, 111420.0005
200
I 1
Feet
Map Amendment#: M23063 Land Use District Map #: 344
EXHIBIT NO. 2
a,o,!igti Via
raj 3`. �""'�� � -�-' -'�+
RC
f `� z
RC to MC
The Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan •
Future Land Use Map is proposed to be amended as
indicated above and briefly described as:
11
Key: Big Pine
Mile Marker: 30
i
Proposal: Change Future Land Use District from RC to MC
Property Description: RE 111420.0001, 111420.0005
M23063
200
Feet
Map Amendment#: Land Use District Map #: 344