Resolution 031-1980
RESOLUTION NO. 31 -1980
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA
TO RECONSIDER THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA'S RESOLUTION NO. 17-1980 CON-
CEm~ING THE ESTABLISHING OF A P~DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BOARD.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe
County, Florida, wishes to fully cooperate with the City
of Key West, Florida, in regards to the Truman Annex surplus
property, and
WHEREAS, the City of Key West has had before it a request
by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to the attached
resolutions requesting that a Joint Liaison Committee be
established to assist in the redevelopment of said property,
and,
WHEREAS, the County has also previously endorsed the
concept of establishing a Joint Redevelopment Authority to
be composed of two (2) County Commissioners and three (3)
City Commissioners from the City of Key West, Florida, with
final plan to be approved by both public bodies and said
concept has been placed before the City Commission of the
City of Key West, Florida, and the County Commission, and
WHEREAS, the County does still desire to fully cooperate
and coordinate jointly with the City in regards to the
redevelopment, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. That the City of Key West, Florida, is hereby
requested to reconsider the attached resolutions and jointly
approve the establishment of a joint commission of the City
and County governments for the redevelopment of the Truman
Annex surplus property.
Page 1 of 2 Pages
82-7
2. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to
forward a certified copy of this resolution to the City
of Key West, Florida, for their appropriate action.
DATED January 29, 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMl1ISSIONERS
~: MONR22~~~:A ,__
Ch~n
(Seal)
Attest:
"--"---,.,. \-~.-
,/, .-.,"'.. .) ",,/)', . <,
\., '" .;/ . ,:':.'<::// ...-/.<.",;~~/".../' . .---" ? . ./ ........
'.----'li"f:t4. ,'......-., .. --~--.. ,,- .. .
/ Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL S{J1FICIENCY,
BY
Page 2 of 2 Pages
3,-~