Loading...
Resolution 074-1992 / F:LEO r: np prr'Dpf' Board of Appeals "92 FEB -6 A8 :19 ;'~ RESOLUTION NO. 074 -1992 D,~\l~,~ . 'IlL. 111_ MOHR(rt \'(lLIN:1. r-U, 'A RESOLUTION BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, SITTING AS THE BOARD OF APPEALS, GRANTING THE APPEAL FILED BY MARK KAMlLAR, ET AL. OF A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION WHICH SUPPORTED THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S ISSUANCE OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 13-89, ISSUED TO JAMES BRUCE, ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 22 UNIT MOTEL. II ML L WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has heard argu- ment from representatives for the appellant, the appellee, and the County with regard to the Planning Commission's support of the minor conditional use approval granted by the Director of Planning in Development Order No. 13-89; and WHEREAS, the record before this Board has been reviewed and includes 1) the application for an administrative appeal, 2) the Planning Commission Resolutions No. 15-91 and 41-91, 3) the Planning Commission meeting transcripts (May 9, 1991 and June 20, 1991), 4) the application for development approval, 5) the Minor Conditional Use Development Order No. 13-89, 6) the record as submitted to the Director of Planning, and 7) the record as submitted to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the record affirmatively reflected that the proposed project was not consistent with the purposes, goals and objectives pursuant to the requirements of Sec. 9.5-65(a), Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, the project failed to be consistent with the local community character as required by Sec. 9.5-65(b), Monroe County Code, in that the proposed development was a structure for multiple occupancy although surrounded by single-family residences which dominate the community character; and WHEREAS, the placing of the 22 unit motel in the residential area as afore-described would have significant adverse effect on the value of surrounding properties and that this factor was not considered as required by Sec. 9.5-65(d), Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, the lack of adequate public facilities and services was not taken into account by the Planning Commission as required by Sec. 9.5-65(e), Monroe County Code, and that such factor was not considered by the Planning Official; and WHEREAS, the project does not foster and preserve public health, safety, comfort and welfare in view of the foregoing as required Sec. 9.5-1, Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, the project was not appropriately set back from the shoreline as required by Sec. 9.5-286, Monroe County Code, and that this factor was not considered by the Planning Official; and WHEREAS, the water treatment facilities proposed were inadequate and did not conform to the requirements of Sec. 9.5-294, Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, there was insufficiency of off-street parking as required by Sec. 9.5-351, Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, for all of the above reasons, the Board of County Commissioners has found that the requirements of basic minor conditional use have not been adhered to; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, sitting as the Board of Appeals, that the appeal of MARK KAMILAR, et a1. is hereby GRANTED and the Planning Commission's Development Order No. 13-89 is hereby overturned. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 29th . day of .. January v -- , A.D., 1992. Vote at Hearing on 1/7/92 Mayor Harvey Mayor Pro Tem London Commissioner Cheal Commissioner Jones Commissioner Stormont Vote for this Resolution Yes 1es 'flea . Yes. 1es- -.. 1lII.. Mayor Harvey Mayor Pro Tem London Commissioner Cheal Commissioner Jones Commissioner Stormont Yes Yes L Yes ..1.;i. y~s BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA -.- .' ~\ ~ By : -""~ ~ 1I ~ J "w-....~ '\ t..--.~ ' Mayor/Chairman (SEAL) ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK By: viappeal1l