Resolution 338-1992
Community Services Division
RESOLUTION NO. 338 - 1992
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE BOARD OF COUNlY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNlY, FLORIDA
RENDERING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER PURSUAN'G TQ
CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, ON AN APPU~("~
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FILED BY TIlE MO.
COUNlY BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS FOIgUIE
MARATIlON AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION DEVELOPP!BNT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT.
:-'-- -,
~ ,.,
--
r
r'1
~ 0
r- r
=>
U1 "
.:tJ
;:s '1
0 !,,:'"")
.h:. :.::;
"D
.c. "
"Tl
:- rl
!>
WHEREAS, on August 22, 1991, the Monroe County Board of County
Commissioners (peter H. Horton, as Agent) filed an Application for Development
Approval (which together with later filed sufficiency responses is hereafter referred to as
the "ADA'1 of a Development of Regional Impact ("DRI'1, with the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, the Monroe County Growth Management Department, the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and other governmental participating review agencies
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380, S. 380.06, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the ADA proposes the expansion of the Marathon Airport Terminal,
which will consist of a commercial aviation terminal building, aircraft apron expansion
and automobile parking area; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is the governing body of the local
government having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, to consider
and approve ADAs for DRI; and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners held a duly
noticed public hearing on the ADA and heard and considered testimony and documents
received thereon (including the South Florida Regional Planning Council's Report, dated
June 1, 1992); and
WHEREAS, all interested parties and members of the public were afforded an
opportunity to participate in the Board of County Commissioners public hearing on the
subject DRI; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the above referenced
documents, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and
members of the general public.
- 1 -
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNlY
COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNlY, FLORIDA, that:
Section 1.
This Resolution shall constitute the Development Order (this
"Order") of the Board of County Commissioners issued in response to the ADA filed by
the Monroe County Commissioners for the expansion of the Marathon Airport Terminal.
The scope of development to be permitted pursuant to this Order includes the land use,
operations and activities described in the ADA and the supporting documents which are
combined as Composite Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 2.
The Board of County Commissioners, having received the
documents referenced above, and having received all related comments, testimony, and
evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is
substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
A. The real property, which is the subject of the ADA, is legally described as
set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
B. The Marathon Airport Terminal Expansion development component and
phasing is identified in Table 1.
TABLE 1
MARATHON AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
ExIsting Phase I Phase II
(Present - (Jan 1, 1994-
Dee. 31, 1993) Dee. 31, 2003) Total
Terminal Complex (Acreage) 0.8 acres 6.4 acres 0.7 acres 7.1 acres
Terminal 2,600 Sq. Ft. 1 19,000 Sq. Ft. 4,000 Sq. Ft. 23,000 Sq. Ft.
Parking 88 spaces 267 spaces 70 spaces 425 spaces
Aircraft Apron 1.0 acres 1.2 acres 2.2 acres
The existing terminal building wiD be replaced by the .- terminal,
C. The proposed DRI is located in an area of critical state concern as
designated by Section 380.05, Florida Statutes and complies with the land
development regulations established for said Section and the provisions of
Section 380.06, Florida Statutes.
D. The proposed DRI is consistent with the adopted local comprehensive plan
and land development regulations.
E. The proposed DRI is in accordance with the applicable Monroe County
zoning district regulations.
F. The proposed DRI will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement or
the objectives of the adopted State land development plan applicable to the
area.
G. The proposed DRI is consistent with the Regional Plan for South Florida.
. 2 -
H. The proposed DR! will not create a material adverse impact on air quality,
groundwater quality, surface water quality, stormwater management
systems, soils, vegetation, wildlife, potable water, wastewater management,
solid or hazardous waste management or disposal, energy demands, or
transportation systems.
I. The South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC), has conducted a
comprehensive review of the impact that the proposed DR! will generate.
The SFRPC assessment is outlined in Exhibit C., attached hereto.
J. The proposed terminal building will be built to withstand Category 5
hurricane winds of 155 miles per hour. The second story of the building
will be designed to withstand a storm surge of 13 feet, and will serve as a
hurricane refuge.
K. This order is consistent with the report and recommendations of SFRPC and
satisfies the provisions of Sections 380.06(14) and 380.06(15), Florida
Statutes.
Section 3.
The Board of County Commissioners, having made the above
findings of fact, reach the following conclusions of law:
A These proceedings have been duly conducted in accordance with applicable
law and regulations and, based upon the record in these proceedings, the
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners is authorized to conduct
its development as described in this Order, subject to the conditions,
restrictions, and limitations set forth below.
B. The review by SFRPC, Monroe County and other participating agencies and
interested citizens reveals that the terms and conditions of this Order and
the ADA adequately address public facilities needed to accommodate the
impacts of the subject DR! in accordance with the requirements of Chapter
380, Florida Statutes. To the extent that the ADA is inconsistent with the
terms and conditions of this Order, the terms and conditions of this Order
shall prevail.
Section 4. Having made the above findings of fact and drawing the above
conclusions of law, it is ordered that the ADA is hereby approved, subject to the following
conditions, restrictions, and limitations:
A. Substantial Deviations. Further review pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, shall be required if a substantial deviation as defined in Section
380.06(19), occurs. A substantial deviation may occur by a material failure
to comply with the commitments contained in this Order, or by activities
which are not commenced until after the expiration of the period of
effectiveness of this Order. All changes in this Order and substantial
deviation determinations shall be consistent with Section 380.06(19),
Florida Statutes.
B. Annual Reports. The Monroe County Board of County Commissioners shall
submit an annual report on the progress of the DR! to the SFRPC, the
Florida Department of Community Affairs and other agencies as may be
appropriate on July 15, 1993, and on July 15 of each following year until
- 3 .
all terms and conditions of this Order are satisfied. The annual report shall
include at a minimum, a complete response to each question outlined in
Exhibit D, attached hereto.
C. Transportation. Incorporate the following into the project design and
operation:
1. Actively encourage and promote ridesharing by establishing a car
and van pool information program;
2. Encourage transit use by provision of bus shelters, development of
turnout lanes, or provision of other amenities to increase ridership
concurrent with the provision of transit services;
3. Provide on-site bicycle storage facilities to encourage use of
alternative modes of transportation; and,
4. limit project vehicle access points to the off-site roadway network to
the number and locations shown in Exhibit E, attached hereto.
D. Soil Erosion and Air Pollution. Incorporate the following into the project
design and operation:
1. Mulch, spray, or grass exposed areas to prevent soil erosion and
minimize air pollution.
E. Stormwater Manaiement. Design construct and maintain any additions,
expansions or replacements to the stormwater management system to meet
the following standards:
1. Prior to the issuance of the development order, resolve issues
regarding the proposed stormwater cistern system and insure that
the region's potable water supply is not negatively impacted.
2. Retain the first flush (at least first half inch) of runoff from project
roadways, parking lots, and loading docks in vegetated retention
areas.
3. Prevent direct discharge of stormwater which has not been treated
pursuant to Condition E.2 to surface waters.
4. Install pollutant retardant structures to treat all stormwater runoff at
each of the project outfall structures (down-turned pipe or other
approved device) and at the drainage structures which contribute
runoff from impervious areas to surface water, in accordance with
the master drainage plan, and periodically remove pollutant
accumulations.
F. Wildlife. Ensure that the burrowing owls are not disturbed. Conduct
educational seminars prior to construction activity to educate workers on
the appearance of the habitat of the owl and instruct in proper avoidance
measures to protect the burrowing owls.
G. Tree Preservation/Landscapina Relocation. Submit a final tree
preservation/relocation landscaping plan for the below listed species. This
plan shall be submitted to SFRPC staff for review and approval prior to the
removal of any tree or any clearing activity. This plan shall include:
1. Location of existing Brittle Thatch Palm, Florida Thatch Palm, Prickly
Pear Cactus, Manchineel, West Indian Mahogany and Coconut Palm;
- 4 -
2. Identification of plans and proposed site for relocation and a
statement of the need for and survival potential of the plants to be
relocated; and,
3. delineation of the preservation areas of the mangrove forest and
tropical hardwood hammock areas except to allow for the removal
of vegetation up to 250 feet from the centerline of the runway
pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations part 77.
H. General Landscapin~. In other additional project landscaping, use only
those plant species identified in Exhibit F, attached hereto, for project
landscaping. Additional species may be used in project landscaping only if
written approval is provided by SFRPC staff. Such approval will be based
on the following criteria:
1. does not require excessive irrigation or fertilizer.
2. is not prone to insect infestation or disease,
3. does not have invasive root systems, and,
4. other criteria as may be appropriate.
As feasible use xeriscape principles in design and implementation of project
landscaping.
I. Exotic Plant Removal. Remove all exotic plant species on the terminal
expansion site and associated parking area as the expansion plan is
implemented.
J. Historical and Archeolo~cal Resources. Notify state archeological officials
at the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State
of construction schedules, and delay construction up to three months in
any area where potentially significant historical or archaeological artifacts
are uncovered, and permit state and local historical preservation officials to
survey and excavate the site.
K. EneriY Conservation. Incorporate energy conservation measures into the
design and operation of the project. At a minimum, construct all
development in conformance with the specifications of the State of Florida
Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code).
Consider using natural gas and/or renewable energy sources (e.g. solar
heating) for water heating, space heating, and cooling.
L. Affordable Housina. Prior to issuance of building permits, address the issue
of affordable housing for low and very low income employees of the
terminal expansion and ensure that any unmet need for these employees
will be satisfied.
M. Public Services. Capacity shall be available for the adequate provision of
public facilities to serve the Marathon Airport Terminal to meet the
requirements established in the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan.
Section 5. Definitions. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the
definitions contained in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, shall control the interpretation and
construction of any terms of this Order. All section references contained in this Order
shall refer to Florida Statutes (1991), unless otherwise indicated.
.5-
Section 6. Commencement and Termination of Development. Physical
development of the subject DRI shall commence by December 31, 1993, unless the
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners extends the time period for
commencement. Physical development means development as defined in Section
380.04, Florida Statutes. Compliance with the conditions of approval outlined in
this Order shall be addressed prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for
the facilities permitted by each phase of development. The termination date for
completing the DRI development project shall be December 31, 2003, provided
that the applicant, its successors and assigns have complied with Section 10 of this
Order. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with Section
380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes.
Section 7. Expiration of Order. This Order shall remain in effect until
December 31, 2010. If approved, any development activity for which plans have been
submitted to Monroe County for its review and approval before the expiration date of this
Order may be completed.
Section 8. Down-zoningllntensity Reduction. The Monroe County Board
of County Commissioners may not down-zone or reduce the intensity or unit density
permitted by this Order until December 31, 2003 unless Monroe County can demonstrate
that:
A. Substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of this Order
have occurred; or
B. This Order was based upon substantially inaccurate information provided
by the applicant; or
C. The changes established by Monroe County are to be essential to the public
health, safety, or welfare.
Any down-zoning or reduction of intensity shall be effected only through
the usual and customary procedures required by statute and/or ordinance for changes in
local land development regulations.
For purposes of this Order, the term "down-zone" shall refer only to
changes in zoning or development regulations that decrease the development rights
approved by this Order, and nothing in this paragraph shall be constructed to prohibit
legally enacted changes in zoning regulations which do not decrease the development
rights granted to the applicant pursuant to this Order. The inclusion of this Section 8
is not to be construed as evidencing any present foreseeable intent on the part of Monroe
County to down-zone or alter density or intensity of the subject DRI, but is included in
this Order to comply with Section 380.06(15)(c)(3), Florida Statutes.
- 6-
Section 9. Consolidation of ADA Information. The applicant shall integrate
all original and supplemental ADA information into a Consolidated Application for
Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the SFRPC, and
one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within 30 days of the effective
date of this Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows:
1. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to
submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this Order, either in response
to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original
pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages; and,
2. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) . Date" notation, with "Page
Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the
page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision.
Section 10. Recordation of Notice of Adoption. The applicant shall record,
within 30 days of the effective date of this Order, Notice of the Adoption of this Order
with the Clerk of the Monroe County Circuit Court pursuant to Section 380.06(15),
Florida Statutes, specifying that this Order runs with the land and is binding on the
applicant, it successors, and assigns, jointly or severally.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Order shall take effect 45 days from
transmittal of this Order to the Department of Community Affairs, the SFRPC, and
applicant; provided however, that if this Order is appealed, this Order will take effect on
the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or resolved pursuant to Section 380.07(2),
Florida Statutes.
Section 12. Incorporation of Consolidated Application for Development
Approval. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties
under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with
the representations contained in the ADA is a condition for approval unless waived or
modified by agreement among the SFRPC and the applicant, its successors, or assigns.
Section 13. Responsibility for Monitoring. The Director of Monroe
County's Community Services Division or his designee will be responsible for ensuring
compliance with all conditions of this Order. Monitoring shall be accomplished by review
of the Annual Report, Building Permits, Certificates of Occupancy and by on-site
observations, as appropriate.
.7-
Section 14. Violations. In the event the applicant, its successors, or assigns
violates any of the conditions of this Order or otherwise fails to act in substantial
compliance with this Order (hereinafter Itviolator'), Monroe County shall stay the
effectiveness of this Order as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in which the violative
activity or conduct has occurred and withhold further permits, approval, and services for
development in said tract, or portion of the tract, upon passage of any appropriate
resolution by the County, adopted in accordance with this Section, finding that such
violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the County that
states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured
within 15 days of said notice, the County will hold a public hearing to consider the
matter within 30 days of the date of said notice. If the violation is not curable in 15 days,
the violator's diligent good faith efforts to cure the violation within that period will
obviate the need to hold a public hearing and this Order will remain in effect unless the
violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to completion within a reasonable
time, in which event the County will give 15 days notice to the violator of its intent to
stay the effectiveness of this Order and without further permits, approvals, and services
as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in which the violation has occurred and until the
violation is cured. For purposes of this paragraph, the work Ittractlt shall be defined to
mean any area of development identified on the Marathon Airport Terminal Expansion
Master Development Plan (Exhibit G). In addition, the phrase "portion of a tract" means
a division of a tract into more than one ownership as created by deed or plat.
Section 15. Directions to Clerk. The Clerk of the Monroe County Board
of County Commissioners shall forward certified copies of this Order to the South Florida
Regional Planning Council and Florida Department of Community Affairs upon adoption
of this Order.
Section 16. Severability. It is the intent of this Order to comply with the
requirements of all applicable law and constitutional requirements. If any provision or
portion of this Order is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void,
unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then such provision or portion shall be deemed null
and void, but all remaining provisions and portions of this Order shall remain in full
force and effect.
.8.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe
County, Florida, at a specT:.dl meeting of said Board held on the 30th day of
June , A.D., 1992.
Mayor Harvey
Mayor Pro Tern London
CommissiQ,ner Jones
Commissioner Cheal
Commissigner Stormont
(SEAL)
Attest: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
B~C,~~
DEPUlY CLERK/
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
---Yes
BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNlY
~"~~~~-;_~~.J.\ '- ~,.~'
~ ., --~
By:
MAYOR/CHAIRMAN
Date:
.9-
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A
MAMmON AIRPORT THRMINAL
. Application For Development Approval
. Application For Development Approval
(Sufficiency Response)
. Application For Development Approval
(Second Sufficiency Response)
· March 30, 1992 Letter to South Florida Regional Planning Council
(Dick Ogburn)
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A
APPUCATION FOR DBVHLOPMENT APPROVAL
This documentation has been supplied with Agenda Item J-7 of the
6/29/92 BOCC meeting. (Resolution granting a Development Order
for a Major Conditional Use for the Marathon Airport Terminal).
We have avoided the duplication of this documentation to save
time, money, and most importantly, trees.
COMPOSITB EXHIBIT A
APPUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
(SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE)
This documentation has been supplied with Agenda Item J-7 of the
6/29/92 BOCC meeting. (Resolution granting a Development Order
for a Major Conditional Use for the Marathon Airport Terminal).
We have avoided the duplication of this documentation to save
time, money, and most importantly, trees.
MM
4tS
I
MARATHON
MM
51./
I
~\b.'
~:::~~
,~V
TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA
FIGURE
3
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Councif
Marathon Airport
Traffic Impact Area
(MM=Mile Marker)
A"""'"
,..iN:
.............,......,.:...,
Source: ADA
Not to
Scale
PART III - COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENOES
This section contains comments sent to the Council by other agencies reviewing Marathon Airport
Terminal Expansion Application for Development Approval.
16
IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
Prepared by
South Florida Water Management District
Issued April 30, 1992
I PROJECT SUMMARY
Project:
Developer:
SFWMD 10 No:
Location:
DRI Threshold:
.
Marathon Airport Terminal
Monroe County ,
91-372
Section l/Township 66 South/Range 32 East,
Monroe County
!9.3 acres (new terminal and aircraft aprons only)
Airport
New commercial passenger terminal; new aircraft
apron area; parking improvements
New airport passenger terminal
Size:
Existing Land Use:
Proposed Land Use:
II GENERAL PROJECT-RELATED INFORMATION
The Marathon Airport DRI is a proposed expansion to the existing airport facility
which is located on Marathon Key in Monroe County (see Exhibit 1). The proposed
improvements include a new commercial aviation terminal building, which triggered
the DRI review process, and expansion of the existing aircraft apron parking area
and automobile parking areas. The specific locatlon of these improvements is
shown on the attached master development plan in Exh i bi t 2. Deve 1 opment is
scheduled to occur in two phases: 1992-1993 and 2003-2011.
.
III POTENTIAL FOR ADVERSE REGIONAL IMPACTS SUMMARY
CateQorv
Minimal
SiQnificant
Major
Surface Water Manaoement - Quantity X
Surface Water Manaoement - Quality X
Water-Related Veoetation/Wildlife N/A
Water Use X
IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In reviewing the available information, District staff has concluded that the
Marathon Airport Terminal DR! could be developed in such a manner that regional
adverse water resource-related impacts would not be likely to occur with regard
17
to surface water management quantity and quality, water use, and water-related
vegetation/wildlife.
Surface Water Manaqement
The major drainage divide on the existing airport site follows the crest of the
main runway. The runoff north of the runway crest currently flows to the north
into an adjacent mangrove area and ultimately into Florida Bay. The area south
of the runway crest is divided into two subbasins: The Southwest Subbasin and the
Southeast, Subbas in. The runoff south of the runway crest is intercepted by
runway swales, existing drainage wells, or the FOOT retention ponds along u.S.
Highway #1. The entire airport site lies within the 100 year floodplain.
The proposed stormwater management system will consist of dry retention areas to
attenuate and treat stormwater runoff and drainag~ wells to provide off-site
conveyance of the runoff after treatment. Swales will capture the runoff from
developed areas and route it to the proposed ponds and wells. The applicant
indicates that the proposed design details, including pond configuration and
control structure elevations, will meet or exceed Distri~t criteria.
The applicant anticipates that the general stormwater management system will
consist of shallow dry ponds with drainage wells located within them. Weirs with
bleed down orifices, as required, will be constructed around the wells to retain
water in ponds for the required water qual ity treatment prior to discharge.
According to the applicant, the 25 year/72 hour design storm event will be used
to size all stormwater management facilities. The ultimate re~eiving bodies will
remain the same: Florida Bay to the north and the Atlantic Ocean to the south.
An application for Conceptual Approval of the proposed surface water management
system (No. 911023-S), has been submitted and is currently being reviewed by
District staff for compliance with District criteria.
.
Water-related Veqetatton/Wildlife
There are approximately 7.7 acres of mangrove dominated wetlands and 31.1 acres
of tropical hardwood hammock within the current airport boundaries. These areas
lie outside of the boundaries .of the proposed DR!. In addition, there is a
burrowing owl's nest located on the airport site. The applicant has indicated
that no construction is proposed within 200 feet of the nest. Consequently, the
proposed improvements to the existing airport facilities will not impact these
existing sensitive areas. Since there are no wetlands or ,water-related
vegetation/wildlife within the DRI boundaries, the Environment checklist and
footnotes have been deleted from this report.
Future renovations and/or expansions to the airport site should be designed to
preserve and enhance the existing wetlands, where possible.
,18
Water Use
Potable water supply will continue to be provided by the Florida Keys Aqueduct
Authority. At this time, the utility has an adequate permitted allocation to
serve the proposed airport expansion.
Non-potable water demands for landscape irrigation and for fire fighting purposes
will be supplied by a cistern located under the proposed airport terminal
building. The cistern will collect storm water runoff from the roof of the
building and will hold treated effluent from the terminal.
I
For additional details concerning the above, see the Water Supply and Development
checklist and footnotes on pages 5 and 6.
The District is recom~ending Development Order Conditions (see below) requiring
that specific conservation measures be incorporated into the project design.
Permits
This project will require the following District permits prior to commencement
of construction:
1. Surface Water Management Permit - for conceptual approval and for
construction and operation of the surface water management system.
J
2. Water Use Permit - for any proposed dewater~~g activities associated with
the construction of project lakes and/or roaQ or building foundations (see
Section V, Disclaimer, second paragraph, for additional information
concerning pending revisions to the District's water use permitting
criteria).
The applicant must provide verification that the proposed system designs will
meet District criteria in effect at the time of permit application.
Recommended Develooment Order Conditions
1. For the purpose of potable water conservation, Marathon Airport Terminal
shall utilize low water use plumbing fixtures, self-closing and/or metered
water faucets, and other water conserving devices.
2. For the purpose of non-potable water conservation, Marathon Airport
Terminal shall utilize xeriscape principles in the design of the project's
landscaping.
19
V DISCLAIMER
This review has been performed by South Florida Water Management District to
provide the South Florida Regional Planning Council with a general technical
assessment of the water-related impacts of this project from the District's
perspective. It is a technical review of the project based on the information
provided by the DRI applicant. It is not a permit under Chapter 373, F.S., nor
is it a commitment for said permits. This review does not constitute final
agency action and it is not binding on this agency. Permit evaluation, pursuant
to Chapter 373, F . S., wi 11 be based upon the cri teri a in effect and the
informatibn available at the time of permit application. Consequently, the
appl;cant is advised that this could result in a change in the District's
technical assessment from that which is contained in this review.
The review of the water supply section of this ADA has been based on current
regulatory criteria regarding water use permits in the South Florida Water
Management District. Please be advised that the existing "Basis of Review for
Water Use Permit Applications in the South Florida Water Management District" is
currently being revised to incorporate recent policy changes regarding urban and
irrigation demand management elements. Certain provisions under the new
criteria, particularly with regard to reclaimed water use and water conservation,
may influence future permitting requirements for this project. Please be advised
that the water supply aspects of the project must meet the water use permitting
criteria in effect at the time of permit application.
20
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A
~ DAMES & MOORE
ONE NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWA Y, SUITE 700, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33609
(813) 875-1115 FAX: (813) 874-7424
March 30, 1992
Mr. Dick Ogburn
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard
Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
RB: MARATIfON AIRPORT DRI
Dear Dick:
Please find attached responses to concerns raised by the South Florida Regional Planning
Council in the most recent SIN. Please nO,te that we have repeated the questions raised
in your transmittal of concerns and have attempted to address the issues that are the
focus of the questions. Please note that while your questions reference a base year of
2010 on passenger projections, we have responded utilizing the ultimate passenger
forecast in the RS&H Terminal Study of 1991.
Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DAMES & MOORE
f)fMtfi~l
John N. laRocca
Associate
JNUsab
Attachment
....' I \JI\oabul'D.kr\ub\~,;z
~1,-"-',!J(30~)"1.:J~5 BOCARATOS(407)994~ ORlA....OO(407)I4I.2727 SARASOTA,;;3)378~5 TA.\IPA(813)87S.1J15 TAllAHASSEE(~)~~,5615 JAO;SO"\'I~ '. ,'~:-::;(o
~lfF\:.. ~. 'f\:": '1::1
IDA SIN. MARATIION AIRPORT THRM1NAL
1. The "dynamic market recapture" approach died In the MaratbotJ Alrpon TermItJJIJ
AR2 SnxlT(Febnwy 1991), and used to esdmatr future enplaned pu-t'F'" at
Marathon AIrport, appears 10 be based aD the assumpdon that meraII anmty
passenger trafBc wW reach 709,200 In the .,ear 2010 (see ~tnrbed tables),
mmpared 10 219,248 enplaned passengers In 1990 (an lncn:ase of llImQ11t half a
mIllJOD enplanemen1S). Bgen assnmlnl future populadon growth at hJstorlcal
rateS, this would be equfnlent 10 an average of more than four enplanemenll per
year fbr each permanent and seasonal resident of Monroe County In the Jar
2010. Tbe Marathon Alrport'sshare of that trafBc would quadruple 10 8l,558 In
the same period, and the sfze of the terminal ~ft!llon Is based on tbae
projectloca. Whfle Council staff agrees that It Is reasonable 10 project that the
Marathon AIrport oould recapture lost market share with an Impnm:d 1amIDa1
&.d1fty, In the oonte:l:t of recent polley dedsJons by Monroe County, would It be
appropriate to oonsfder an e:spanaIOD of the tamJnaI which II based on a smaDer
lncreue of overall trafBc 1n1D the countyl
Respondent5 Note: Responses include reference to the RS&H Area Terminal Study,
1991, where projecdons are esdmated through the year 2011.
Although the passenger projections for the Marathon Airpon are proposed to be
84,703 enplaned passengers by the year 2011 (RS&H Area Terminal Study, 1991),
the proposed terminal facility is not based on those total passengers. The FAA
standards (Advisory Circular 150/5360-9) advises that the terminal size for small
airports with less than 250,000 enplanements should be based on peak hour
considerations. The FAA further advises that terminal building designs should be
based on about 150 sJ. to 250 s.l. of gross terminal area per peak hour passenger
(Advisory Circular 150/5360-13).
Although a forecast method of dynamic market recapture was used to justify the
need for the termin~ improvements, the improvements are not based on the total
of 84,703 enplaned passengers. Instead, the terminal expansion is based on the
peak hour projections. The peak hour passenger level is based on aircraft arriving
and departing during the peak hour. In other words, it is a composite of inbound
and outbound passengers. In order to avoid under or over design of a terminal,
a typical peak hour passenger unit is used which represents the 90th percentile
of the true peak hour. In 1991 the peak hour passengers totaled 73. Based on
FAA guidelines, this would equate to a terminal size of 11,000 s.f. to 18,050 s.l
wp' I \JI\.......-~\....\).12
I
BXHIBrr B
LEGAl.. DESCRIPTION ·
Parcel"!"
A parcel of land described as commencing at a concrete monument on the West boundary
of Section I, Township 66 South, Range 32 fa.lit, at a point 125.28 feet North of the
Southwest Corner of said Section I, and run North 67051' East 54 feet for POINT OF
BEGINNING: thence continue North 670'1 East 7058.68 feet to the beginning of a curve
to right having a radius of 2980.93 feet and a central angle of 10000'; thence
Northeasterly along said curve to right 520.27 feet to point of tangency; thence North
7,051' East 806.43 feeti thence North 22009' West 118'.18 feet; thence South 670,1'
West 7962.84 feet to a point 50 feet East of the West Hne of Section 1; thence South
00002'30' West 1077.41 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNINGi and
Parcel "2"
A parcel of land in Section 1. Township 66 South, Range 32 East and in Section 6,
Township 66 South, Range 33 East, Vaea Key, Monroe County, Florida, being the
northerly 40.00 feet of State Road 4-A adjoining the southerly boundary of that certain
Parcel"l" acquired from the State of Florida, State Road Department by Quit Claim Deed.
Parcels 1 and 2 containing 197.4 acres more or less.
011 Note: This legal de$Cription Includes the ~nd commonly knowo as the Marathon Airport property. The proJect area
,ubje~ of this DRI encompswes 10.6 acre. and i. Included within the boundaries of the ~rall Ai1'pQrt
property.
AIlIQIIr"._\N\M2
ln11oOOH01O
South
Florida .
Regional - ,
Planning
Council
EXHIBIT C
June 5,1992
The Honorable Wllhelmina Harvey
Mayor, Monroe County
500 Whitehead Street
Key West, Florida 33040
Dear Mayor Harvey:
The South Florida Regional Planning Council has adopted the enclosed Marathon Airport
Terminal Expansion Development of Regional Impact and forwarded copin to the Department of
Community Affairs and other reviewing entities. "This report is provided for your use in reviewing
the project and preparing a development order.
While the staff of the Council is available to assist in resolving any matter regarding this report, the
Council has no, legal mechanism through which it can act on this report again, except through
appeal procedures.
Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code, set criteria for
development orders. Please review these criteria, as well as the enclosed Council
recommendations, carefully prior to issuing a development order for this project.
Copies of any development order issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the
Council and the Department of Community Affairs, which have 4S days thereafter to make an
appeal decision.
If we can be of further assistance, please calL
Sincerely,
I ", , "Y
l U<.f,:: ~~ /
Carolyn A. Oekle
Executive Director
, ,. ./
i ~......./.'- \. \..
CAD/kc
Enclosure
cc: See attached list
J1\monr....uh\sab\lHl2
1737S-008-!5Ol5O
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite '140, Hollywood. Florida 33021
Broward (305) 961-2999, Dade (305) 620-4266, FAX (305) 961-0322
~~RATHON ~IRPORT TERMINAL
Florida Department of Commerce
Ms. Wynelle Wilson
Bureau of Economic Analysis
406 Fletcher Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Ms. Marion Hedgepeth
Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation
1900 South Congress Avenue, Suite A
West Palm Beach, FL 33046
Florida Department of Natural Resources
Mr. David Trimble
Bureau of Environmental Land Management
3900 Commonwealth Blvd., Room 508
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Florida Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission
Mr. Ray Fernald
Office of Envimnmental Services
110 43rd Ave., S.W.
Vero Beach, FL 32962
South Florida Water Management District
Mr. Jim Golden
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Mr. Jim Snyder
Florida Dept. of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Mr. Bruce Offord
1900 So. Congress Ave., Suite A
West Palm Beach, FL 33046
Florida Department of State
Mr. George W. Percy, Director
Div. of Historical Resources and
State Historic Preservation Officer
R.A. Gray Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250
Monroe County
Mr. Bob Herman, Acting Director
Growth Management Department
Public Service Bldg., Wing II
Stock Island
5825 Junior College Road
Key West, FL 33040
Monroe County
Mr. Peter Horton, Director
Community Services Department
Public Service Bldg., Wing II
Stock Island
Key West, FL 33040
Florida Department of Transportation
Mr. Servando Parapar
602 S. Miami Avenue
Miami, FL 33130
City of Key West"
Mr. Ted Strader
Planning Director
P.O. Box 1409
525 Angela Street
Key West, FL 33041
Mr. Bob Ernst
7525 Gulfstream Boulevard
Marathon, FL 33050
Mr. Mark Yanna .
U.S. fish & Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 2676
Vera Beach. FL 3296l-2676
,South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Council
.
MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM #00
Date: JUNE 1, 1992
To: COUNCIL MEMBERS
From: STAFF
Subject: MARATHON AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION. MONROE COUNTY
· Location:
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140, Hollywood, Florida 33021
Broward (305) 961-2999, Dade (305) 620-4266. FAX (305) 961-0322
· Proposed Development and Phasing
TABLE 1
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Existing Phase I
TERMINAL COMPLEX 0.8 Acres 6.4 Acres
Tenninal 2/600 Sq. 'Ft.1 19/000 Sq. Ft.
Parking 88 Spaces 2h7 Spaces
AIRCRAFT APRON 1.0 Acres 1.2 Acres
Phase II
0.7 Acres
4/000 Sq. Ft.
70 Spaces
1 This building will be replaced by the new'terminaL
SOURCE: ADA, SFRPC
Major Issues and Conditions
The project is generally consistent with the Regional Plan for South Florida.
The Applicant has agreed to:
· construct the terminal building so that it may be used as a hurricane refuge;
· incorporate energy conservation measures into the design of the project; and,
· ensure that the burrowing owls will not be disturbed.
Recommendation
Approval subject to conditions.
2
TOTAL
7.1 Acres
23/000 Sq. Fl
425 Spaces
2.2 Acres
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
FOR
MARATHON AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION
Located in Monroe County
SOUTI-I FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
June, 1992
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
UST OF FI CURES.................. ..... ........ ............................... ............ ........... ............. .......... ......... .......... .......... i
UST OF TAB LES .......... .................... ...... ................ .................. ................. ............. ...... ..... ..................... ...... ii
UST 0 F EXliIBITS ...................... ....................................................... ............. ............ ................... ............iii
I
INfR 0 D VerI ON.......................... ......... ........................... ................. ...... ....;........ ........................... ........... 1
PART I.
PROJECT D ESCRIPTI ON...................................... ............. ......... ............... ....... .......... 2
A. APPLICANT INFO RMA TI ON.................................. ........................... ................ 2
B. PROJECT INFORMA nON .................................................................................. 2
PART II.
PROJECT IMP ACTS AND ISSUES ..;.......................................~.................................. 6
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES........................................... 6
B. ECO NO My....... ............. ................ ..... .................... ................. .......................... ...... 8
C. PUBLIC FA CI LITIES ........................... ................................................................. 11
D. TRANSPORTATION .........................................:..................................................13
PART III.
COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES..................................... 16
PART IV.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SOUTH
FLO RID A ................................. ......... ......... ..... ....... ............................ .................. .......... 27
.
PART V.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 28
Figure No.
t
2
3
LIST OF FIGURES
TItle Page
Project Loca tio n ................................... ............. ................ .............................................. 4
Master Development Plan ............................................................................................ 5
T raffle 1m paet Area.................................................................. ..................................... 15
Table No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LIST OF TABLES
Title Page
Proposed Developmen t ......... .......... .............................. ....... ..... ..... .............. ...... .......... 3
Project Cos ts . ........... ............................ ................... ..... .... ............. ......... ...... .................... 8
Permanent Em p loymen t Impacts ................................ ................................. .............. 9
Direct Fiscal 1m pacts . ........~.................... ......... ................................................ ............. 11
Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste .......................................................................11
Estimated Annual Energy Consumption ................................................................12
Project Tri p Gene ra tio n.......... .......... ................. ......... ....... ......... .............. ........... ........ 14
.
ii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
1
2
3
4
TItle Page
Recommended S pedes Us t .............................. .... .............. ......... ....... .............. .......... 33
Project Access Locations .................. ................ ...... ........ ........ ......... ............................ 37
Annual Sta tus Report ............................ ......................... ...................... ....................... 38
Master Deve lop men t Plan .~~............ ................................ ...... ......... ............... ............. 42
ill
.
PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. APPUCANT INFORMATION
Project Name: Marathon Airport Terminal Expansion
Applicant: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Public Service Building
Stock Island
Key West, Florida 33040
,,^ )'
Date of Acceptance of Application: 'fi,~ 26; 1992
Date of Receipt of Local Public Hearing Notice: April 28, 1992
Deadline of Council Action: June 16, 1992
Date of Local Public Hearing: June 30, 1992
Type of Development: Airport Terminal Expansion
Location of Development: Monroe County
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
The proposed terminal project is located at the Marathon Airport near mile marker 52 on
Vaca Key, as depicted in Figure 1. The existing 2,600 square foot terminal building was
constructed in 196~ and is undersized to meet the needs of commercial aviation traffic at
Marathon. In order to meet this need the County has proposed the development of a new
terminal complex.
The proposed project consists of development of a commercial aviation terminal building,
aircraft apron expansion, and automobile parking area. The terminal complex will be
constructed in two phases. Phase I will include approximately 19,000 square feet of terminal
area, 267 parking spaces and 1.2 acres of aircraft apron expansion. Phase II will include an
additional estimated 4,000 square feet of terminal area and 70 long term parking spaces.
Phase I is scheduled to commence in 1992, with construction being completed in 1993. While
a construction date for Phase II has not been finalized, a 2003 construction date is being used
for planning purposes. The development proposal is outlined in Table 1 and shown in
Figure 2.
The Applicant states that the proposed terminal building will be built to withstand Category
5 hurricane winds of 155 miles per hour. The second story of the building win be designed
to withstand a storm surge of 13 feet, and win serve as a hurricane refuge. At present, there
is no hurricane refuge in Marathon capable of withstanding a Category 5 storm event.
2
INTRODUCflON
This assessment of the proposed Development of Regional Impact (DRl) known as Marathon
Airport Terminal Expansion has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning CounciL as
required by the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act.
The assessment is based on informatiop supplied by Monroe County staff, state, federal and
regional agencies, official plans, consultants, and field inspection~ Additional research relative to
specific issues was conducted by Council staff where needed.
I
In accordance with the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the positive and negative
impacts likely to result from the proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the County
Commission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of
regionaL in addition to local, impacts and issues.
Copies of any development order issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the
South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
TABLE 1
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENf
Existing Phase I
TERMINAL COMPLEX 0.8 Acres 6.4 Acres
Ter.rnnal 2,600 Sq. Ft.1 19,000 Sq. Ft.
Parking 88 Spaces 267 Spaces
AIRCRAFT APRON 1.0 Acres 1.2 Acres
1 This building will be replaced by the new terminaL
SOURCE: ADA. SFRPC
3
Phase II
0.7 Acres
4,000 Sq. Ft.
70 Spaces
TOTAL
7.1 Acres
23,000 Sq. Ft.
425 Spaces
2.2 Acres
I},~~ "
~"':.:::::.~
"'....~.
~v
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Councif
FLORIDA
BAY VACA KEY
HAWK
MARATHON CHANNEL
AIRPORT
PROJECT LOCATION
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
Source: ADA
Not to
Scale
FIGURE
1
'&'''''....:'..''
dR,
:':':':'>.,.-./:::::::-.
c
(
~:-l~-t:~~::~-=~~:~~3~~;~::~?/=:::=
, u, . _..m"'..........'''.. "" ,.,,/~,...'"_....................~......M.".."M".. 5 2:t . "
~:.:-...:...-_........~:.....~I...~4,. ,,_....~i.~ n' ;"
~ t....
i
.
^..~\.
~. .aL,:,,~Q;U
!
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FIGURE
2
I
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Councif
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
.
I
Not to
Scale
Source: ADA
PART 11- PROJECfIMPACfS AND ISSUES
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Air Ouality
The project has been reviewed by staff of the South Florida Regional Planning Council
(SFRPq and the Florida Department of Environmental" Regulation (FDER). It has
been determined that the automobile traffic for the proposed project will not exceed
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide for the buildout
year. Therefore, the applicant is not required to conduct air quality modeling.
2. Water Quality
a. Groundwater
Depending on tidal action, the seasonal high groundwater table depth under
the site is 2 to 3 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). The natural
land elevation of the site is 4.5 feet NGVD. The project lies over the Biscayne
Aquifer and special care must be, taken to minimize the entry of additional
pollutants to the groundwater system. asterns are proposed to collect storage
volumes of run-off. Such cisterns should not permeate the groundwater table
elevation. The applicant reports the source of their non-potable water for
irrigation will be the on-site cistern system and reuse of water from the on-site
water treatment plant. Condition 2 in Part V of this report will minimize
impacts to the groundwaters which m':'f result from the proposed
development.
b.
Surface Waters
.
Particularly in South Florida, both ground and surface waters are hydrologically
connected. A problem in one system often becomes a problem for the other.
The soils on-site have severe limitations to filter pollutants and special care must
be taken to minimize the entry of additional pollutants to the groundwater
system. Condition 2 of Part V of this report will minimize impacts to the
ground and surface waters which may result from the proposed development.
The applicant has conducted a water quality analysis. While the samples did
not exceed state standards, the analysis provides important baseline data. The
waters of Monroe County surrounding the site are designated as Outstanding
Florida Waters (OFW) pursuant to Chapter 17, F.A.C. These rules prohibit
degradation of ambient water quality in OFW. Condition 2 addresses the need
to safely manage stormwater to ensure the quality of nearby waters.
3. Stormwater Management
A major continuing source of ground and surface water pollution is stormwater-
runoff. Runoff generated at the beginning of a rain event (the first flush) contains
most of the pollutants that are washed from impervious areas, such as parking lots
and roadways. The first flush should be retained on site and cleansed so that
pollution of the Florida Keys offshore waters is minimized.
6
The project contemplates three drainage areas covering a watershed area of 298.6
acres. The North Basin, approximately 94.2 acres, generally encompasses the north
half of the airport site, bounded on the south by the centerline of the active runway.
Two 24-inch diameter concrete culverts carry discharges to the Dodge Lake outfall and
on to the Gulf of Mexico. The remaining southerly portion of the site is divided into
East and West Basins along a 6.0 foot elevation contour in the vicinity of the existing
fire station. These two basins include both on-site area and offsite areas of US 1 right-
of-way, for which an existing permit from the South Florida Water Management
Disbict (SFWMD) was obtained during Florida Department of Transportation
construction of improvements to the highway. Under that permit, a total of nine
Class V injection wells were constructed. These two basins also discharge overflows to
offshore waters.
The terminal expansion and other improvements are expected to increase the
impervious area by 10.8 acres. Because there will be no development in the area
served by the North Basin, the applicant proposes no modifications to the existing
drainage system. For the East and West Basins the applicant proposes to construct a
new detention facility (a O.l3-acre pond), lower the bottom of two existing ponds, and
install 17 additional 24-inch diameter Class V injection wells. This will enable this
portion of the system to retain the 25-year 24-hour and the 25-year 72-hour storm
events with no offsite discharge, in accordance with SFWMD and Monroe County
drainage design criteria. Condition 2 in Part V of this report will minimize the impacts
of stormwater from this project on water quality.
4. Land and Soils
According to the application for development approval, the soil type is Rockland.
Portions of the area have already been filled. Umitations of the soil type are severe
and include bedrock dose to the surface and severe seepage potential. Any limitations
for construction due to soils will be overcome by the use of standard engineering
techniques.
5. Flood Prone Areas
The proposed project is within the 100-year flood area and has been designated as AE
by the Federal Insurance Administration of Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA). The site has a base flood elevation of 6 and 7 feet NGVD. The runway apron
and parking lots will be elevated to 6 feet NGVD and the finished floor elevation of
the terminal will be 8 feet NGVD.
The surface water management system will be designed to ensure that roadways do
not flood in a ,5-year!25-hour storm event and that flood levels do not exceed the first
floor in a 100-year/3 day storm event.
6. Veietation and Wildlife
Several native vegetative associations exist on-site including salt marsh and
buttonwood associations, mangrove fringe and tropical harwood hammock. Usted
species include the Brittle Thatch Palm and the Florida Thatch Palm, (both
commercially exploited species). The remaining four species are all listed as
threatened species, the Prickly Pear Cactus, the Manchineel, the West Indian
Mahogany and the Coconut Palm. Usted wildlife (FGFWFq is limited to. the
7
burrowing owl which is listed as a Species of Special Concern. Conditions 3 and 4 in
Part V of this report wiU minimize the impacts to these listed species.
B. ECONOMY
1. Proiect Costs
The applicant estimates a total project cost of $7.6 million. Phase I, which is scheduled
to be completed by 1993, would expand the terminal to approximately 19,000 square
feet Phase IT, which would be constructed in 2003, would add approximately 4,000
more square feet to the terminal building. Approximately 98 percent of the
expenditures are expected to be spent in the Region, as shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
PROJECf COSTS (thousands of 1991 doUars)
Proiect Costs Amount Spent % Spent
Item Phase I Phase II Total In Region In Region
Land 0 0 0 0 0
Labor 3,990 420 4,410 4,410 100
Materials 2,660 280 2,940 2,940 100
Interest 0 0 0 0 0
Preliminary Planning 270 0 270 135 50
Other Q Q Q Q Q
TOTAL 6,920 700 7,6W 7,485 98
SOURCE: ADA
The Applicant projects a need for 26 full-time construction employees in Phase I and
10 construction employees in Phase II. Although no estimates have been carried out
to this effect, it is reasonable to suppose that the induced effects from the jobs created
during the construction period, and the resulting increased income in the region,
would have an impact which is somewhat larger than that estimated for the direct
project cost
2. Permanent Employment
The applicant states that a total of 36 new permanent jobs will have been fiUed at
project completion, in the year 2003. These jobs, most of which would, be created
during Phase I, would result from the additional terminal activities proposed in the
project, and would include employees in both the airlines and the food, gift shop and
rental car concessions. .
These projected new permanent jobs, organized by SIC code, were introduced into
the Regional Science Research Institute (RSRI) regional input-output model, which
produces an estimate of the overaU annual impact of the project on employment, the
value of output, wages and value added for each county in the South Florida region.
The totals take into account both the direct and indirect impacts which new jobs a,nd
new income have on the local economy (fable 3).
8
However, to the extent that additional tourist traffic results from the proposed
terminal expansion, the project could have an impact on the local economy which
goes beyond the direct and indirect employment and income generation indicated in
the table. In this case, it is reasonable to suppose that the indirect impact of the
terminal expansion would be larger than the simulations carried out with the input-
output model indicate, because the increased tourist traffic is not captured fully by the
model The fiscal analysis provided by the Applicant recognizes this premise.
TABLE 3
ALLOCATION OFREGIONAL EFFEcrs AMONG
CONSTITUENT COUNTIES
A. EMPLOYMENT (IN JOBS; NOT NECESSARILY FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS)
SO. FLA. PALM
BROWARD DADE MONROE REGION BEACH
AGRICULTURE .1 .1 .0 .2 .1
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH .0 .0 .0 .1 .0
MINING .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
CONSTRUCTION .3 .4 .0 .8 .2
MANUFACTURING .2 .8 .0 1.0 .1
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES .2 1.6 9.0 10.8 .2
\JHOlESAlE .3 1.8 .0 2.2 .3
RETAIL TRADE 2.2 3.2 13.1 18.6 1.1
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE .6 1.4 .0 2.0 .3
SERVICES 2.2 4.8 14.2 21.1 1.2
GOVERNMENT .1 .1 .0 1.2 .0
ADMIN. AUXILIARY .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
TOTAL 6.2 14.3 . 36.4 56.9 3.6
B. VALUE OF OUTPUT (IN THOUSANDS OF 1982 DOLLARS)
SO. FLA. PALM
BROWARD DADE MONROE REGION BEACH
AGRICULTURE 2.3 3.1 .1 5.4 2.5
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH .9 1.3 .1 2.2 1.0
MINING .3 .7 .0 1.0 .1
CONSTRUCTION 7.3 10.5 .4 18.1 4.0
MANUFACTURING 17.4 43.1 .1 60.6 6.4
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES 7.4 113.9 419.1 540.5 10.4
\JHOlESALE 11.3 63.9 .5 75.6 8.3
RETAIL TRADE 44.3 66.7 278.7 389.7 22.1
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE 43.0 93.5 1.3 137.8 22.7
SERVICES 57.7 135.1 841.9 1034.6 30.2
GOVERNMENT 2.7 7.2 .1 10.0 1.5
ADMIN. AUXILIARY .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
TOTAL 194.6 538.9 1542.1 2275.6 109.3
.
9
C. TOTAL YAGES (IN THOUSANDS OF 1982 DOLLARS)
SO. FLA. PALM
BROWARD DADE MONROE REGION BEACH
AGRICULTURE .5 .7 .0 1.3 .6
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH .2 .3 .0 .5 .2
MINING .1 .1 .0 .2 .0
CONSTRUCT ION 4.8 6.9 .2 11.9 2.7
MANUFACTURING 3.6 9.0 .0 12.7 1.3
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES 1.9 28.9 162.9 193.7 2.6
~HOlESALE 5.0 28.3 .2 33.5 3.7
RETAIL TRADE 18.7 28.2 92.9 139.8 9.4
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE; 8.4 18.3 .2 26.9 4.4
SERVICES 20.8 48.7 143.4 212.9 10.9
GOVERNMENT .8 2.1 .0 2.9 .4
ADMIN. AUXILIARY .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
TOTAL 64.9 171 .5 399.9 636.3 36.3
D. VALUE ADDEO (IN THOUSANDS OF 1982 DOLLARS)
SO. FLA. PALM
BRO'JARD DADE MONROE REGION BEACH
AGRICULTURE 1.2 1.7 .0 2.9 1.4
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH .5 .7 .0 1.2 .6
MINING .2 .5 .0 .7 .0
CONSTRUCTION 5.7 8.1 .3 14.0 3.1
MANUFACTURING 5.8 14.5 .0 20.3 2.2
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES 3.9 60.0 251.6 315.5 5.5
WHOLESALE 8.4 47.4 .3 56.2 6.2
RETAIL TRADE 29.7 44.7 150.3 224.7 14.8
FINANCE. INS., & REAL ESTATE 31.3 68.1' . .9 100.2 16.5
SERVICES 35.0 81.9 ' 410.3 527.2 18.3
GOVERNMENT- 1.3 3.4 .1 4.7 .7
ADMIN. AUXILIARY .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
TOTAL 122.9 330.9 813.9 1267.7 69.3
The results of the simulation indicate that the permanent new employment (which
does not include jobs created during the construction phases of the project) could
generate a total of up to 56 new jobs in the region, with 36, 14 and 6 in Monroe, Dade
and Broward counties, respectively. This employment is estimated to generate
approximately $636,000 (in 1982 dollars) in total annual wages. The average wage of
$11,183 (in 1982 dollars) is slightly below average when compared to other. projects
evaluated by Council staff, and reflects the preponderance of low-paying' retail and
service jobs expected at the site. The project, by its direct and indirect effects, could
add as much as $1.3 mimon in value added to the regional economy each 'ye-ar.
3. Fiscal Impact
The Monroe County Airport is exempt from the payment of ad valorem taxes and
impact fees for public facilities. On the other hand, the applicant estimates that the
project will generate additional revenues of nearly $800 thousand per year by the year
2011. These direct fiscal impacts, which would result from the growth in tourist traffic
and a consequent increase in sales and gasoline taxes and the payment of fees for
commercial leases, are summarized in Table 4 below.
.
10
TABLE 4
DIRECT FISCAL IMPACTS (thousands of 1991 dollars)
REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY FOR SELECTED YEARS
Revenues 1993 2003 2011
Sales Taxes Received 94 184 298
Gasoline Taxes Received 6 11 19
Commercial Leases 221 327 480
TOTAL 321 522 797
SOURCE: ADA
The costs of providing infrastructure and services to the project have not been
incorporated in Table 4. The applicant indicates that a watermain extension costing
$150,000 will be required for Phase I, and the overall project costs include wastewater
treatment, stormwater management and internal access improvements.
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste
TABLE 5
Table 5 summarizes the project's impact on water, wastewater, and solid waste.
WATER, W ASTEW ATER, AND SOUD WASTE
Public Average Peak
Facility Demand Demand
Potable 0.0068 0.017
Water MGD MGD
Non-Potable 0.0032 0.008
Water MGD MGD
Wastewater 0.0068 0.017
MGD MGD
Solid Waste 0.316 1.738
TPD
CYPD
MGD = Million Gallons Per Day
TPD = Tons per Day
CYPD - Cubic Yards per Day
SOURCE: ADA
11
.
Source
Available
Capacity
Florida Keys
Aqueduct Authority
Yes
On-site
Underground cistern
On-site
treatment
Waste Mgt. Inc.
Yes
2. Energy
Table 6 summarizes the estimated annual energy consumption by the project.
TABLE 6
ESTIMATED ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Fuel
Source
BTUs
(Million)
Kilowatt Hours
(Million)
Electricity
141
.041
SOURCE: ADNSFRPC
Florida Power and light uses a variety of fuel sources to generate electricity.
Although the exact percentage of electricity produced from each fuel source varies
from year to year, FPL has projected the following combination of fuel sources to
produce electricity for the period 1990 to 1995: nuclear, 26.7 percent; oil. 16.2 percent;
natural gas, 18.9 percent; coal. 2.3 percent; and additional sources (mostly purchased
electricity), 35.8 percent.
FPL reports that natural gas and oil are the most efficient of these fuels, followed
closely by nuclear and gas turbine. The most efficient method of producing electricity
involves technology that will require alteration to existing plants.. These alterations
will allow for the use of additional fuel sources such as fuel oil. coal derived gas, or
natural gas. Such alterations to existing facilities will result in significant
improvements in efficiency.
Energy consumption can be reduced by designing more energy efficient buildings and
by constructing new buildings in conformance with the State of Florida energy
efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code). Condition 8 requires
construction to conform with the State Energy Code.
Another method of reducing energy consumption is to use natural gas whenever
feasible for water heating, space heating, and cooling.
The applicant has proposed to incorporate certain design and construction techniques
into the proposed development which will yield efficiency ratings that exceed the
minimum rating in the State Energy Code. The applicant will use insulations,
ventilation, and construction techniques that will yield a higher energy efficiency
rating in office buildings.
3. Police, Fire and Emer~ency Medical Services
Local officials report that they expect to be able to serve the project. The Monroe
County Sheriff indicates that the proposed Marathon Airport Terminal improvements
will result in an airport classification which will mandate certain security provisions.
The anticipated additional personnel needed includes a five (5) person squad with a
salary budget of $115,000. An additional $3,000 per employee is anticipated for start
up costs, employment and uniforms in addition to any cost of living increases in the
next two years. Other expenses would include a vehicle and its associated costs, plus
12
.
any equipment which may be required. An initial budget estimate would be
approximately $165,000 - $175,000.
The fire chief indicates that in order to keep up the fire fighting needs of the
community and the airport, the fire station located at the airport will need to be
doubled in size. In regard to emergency medical services, the Administrator for the
FISherman's Hospital indicates that the hospital is a 58-bed facility located at Mile
Marker 48, which is approximately 3 miles from the project site will be able to
accommodate the needs of the project. Emergency services are provided by the
Monroe County Emergency Services Department which has an average response time
of 3.5 minutes within its service district.
D. TRANSPORTATION
1. Existing Traffic
The traffic impact area includes a six-mile portion of the US 1 from Mile Marker 48 to
Mile Marker 54 (Figure 3). Since the adopted Comprehensive Plan for Monroe County
is currently determined not in compliance by the State, the Level of Service (LOS) "CO
standard for US 1 as required in the Stipulated Settlement Agreement entered into
between the County and the Department of Community Affairs is used. Of the 12 US
1 segments studied, no segment currently operates below LOS "CO during the
afternoon peak hour.
2. Future Backlrround Traffic Impacts
a. Provammed Improvements
No roadway improvements are programmed within the traffic impact area.
b. Future Traffic Growth
The future condition vehicle traffic growth analysis was developed for years
1993 and 2003, the years of projected opening for the Phases I and II terminal
expansions. Non-project traffic was estimated using both historical traffic
growth rates and projected population growth rates for specific areas in Monroe
County.
3. Proiect Traffic Impacts
a. Trip Generation
Project traffic projections reflect demand based upon ultimate capacities of the
project for Phases I and II as documented in the "Marathon Airport Terminal
Area Study" Tripmakers were categorized into three groups to facilitate the
analysis including commercial air passengers, well-wishers and employees.
Total project vehicle traffic in addition to the existing airport-generated traffic
for Phases I and II is shown in Table 7 below.
13
TABLE 7
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
1993
2003
PM Peak Hour Trips
137
64
Phase
I
II
Year
TOTAL
201
SOURCE: ADA
4. Additional Improvements Needed to Accommodate Proiect Traffic
At project buildout, all the twelve US 1 segments studied are projected to operate at
LOS "B" or better. Hence, no off-site improvements will be needed. Condition 9
contained in Part V of this report addresses the number and general locations of the
project access points to US 1.
14
The projected peak hour passengers for 1996 is 130 passengers (based on a
projected 36,023 enplaned passengers), requiring a terminal size of 19,500 s.f. to
32,500 s.f. The projected peak hour passengers for the year 2001 is 165
passengers (projected 53,246 enplaned passengers), requiring a terminal size of
24,750 s.f. to 41,250 s.c. Using the most conservative estimates of 150 s.c. per peak
hour traffic, the Phase I terminal expansion is based not only on the current need,
but on the projections of 36,023 enplaned passengers in 1996 while Phase IT
improvements are based on approximately 51,100 enplaned passengers. In
conclusion, although the enplaned passenger projections have been provided, the
terminal expansion is based on a much smaller increase of passengers.
2. We would like to see a general dUcusalon of the relennt conafderadODl In the
determ1nadon of meraD termlDallfze, addressing the fbllowlng:
L The MuatbotJ AIrport Terminal .An::lI Study stata that Ideal terminal size II a
function of peak hour passengers. What II the projected relationship ~l.....-.u
overall and peak hour trafflc fbr Marathon AIrportl
The relationship between the overall and peak hour traffic for Marathon Airport
var:les slighdy. It is generally based on a .003 to .0036 multiplier of the total
enplaned passengers. As described in Question 1, the peak hour passenger level
is based on aircraft arriving and departing during the peak hour. In other words,
it is a composite of inbound and outbound passengers. In order to avoid under
or over design of a terminal, a typical peak hour passenger unit is used which
represents the 90th percentile of the true peak hour.
b. How Jlczfble II the current terminal design fbr adjust4..ut In the ewent that a
smaller projection of annual trafBc were used to determine Ideal 1Ize?
The current Marathon Airport terminal design is not flexible for adjustment in
square footage. The terminal size is based on current passenger needs and FAA
guidelines for peak hour passenger enplanements. .;:.
c. What &ctcrs would aft'ect the poteDdal CUlt sm.op wblch might JaUlt from
modUlations In the 1enDInaI alze? 1.1 It poesfble with current data to praent
rough esdmates of maaII alII1I for a range of terminal sizes?
Extreme losses would result from any modifications to the terminal size at this
time. Any modification to the terminal size would cost the project the FM funding
wp' I \Jl\lDaI'aIhon.q1N\ub\U2
(the FM is funding 50% of the project). The TM requires that construction bids
and project application must be transmitted by August 15, 1992 in order to receive
grant funding no later than September 30, 1992. A change to the square footage
would require a redesign of the terminal and facilities (i.e. wastewater treatment
plant) and the resubmittal of a Major Conditional Use Application in accordance
with the Monroe County Land Development Regulations. The Major Conditional
Use Review takes approximately six months. It would not be possible to redesign
the terminal, obtain County review and approval of the project and ultimately
receive grant funding.
d. What other concerns czbt with regard to the ldealllze of the terminal for the most
I.lkeIy scenarios mer a 20-year pla.nnlng hortzon?
The Applicant has no other concerns with regard to the size of the airport
terminal over a 20-year planning horizon.
...,., I \J1'm.........n.'lue'....'~
SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT - Marathon Airport Terminal
ORI No. 91-372
Proposed Potable Water Source: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority
Permit No.: 13-00005-W Expiration Date: 06/14/95
Permitted Allocation: 556'BGY. (15.23 MGO) Current Usage: 12.0452 MGO
Projected Demand of DRI: 6,800 GPO (.0068 MGD)
Proposed Non-Potable Water Source: Cistern Under Proposed Terminal
Projected Demand of ORI: 3,200 GPO (.0032 MGO)
IACCEPTABLE I
I RESPONSE I
I IN I
I APPLICATION I
Building(l)
RESOLVABLE
AT PERMIT TIME
MINOR I MAJOR
I
I MAJOR I
I REGIONAL I
I ISSUES I
I. PROJECTED DEMANDS OF PROJECT
A. POTABLE WATER
1. Use Generation Rates X
2. Conservation Practices X(2)
B. NON-POTABLE WATER
1. Use Generation Rates Xn)
2. Conservation Practices X(2)
3. Wastewater Re-use X( 1)
II. WATER USE IMPACTS
A. ON-SITE
1. ProDosed Sources
a. Groundwater
b. Surface Water
c. Wastewater Re-use
d. Reverse Osmosis
2. Resource Caoability
3. Imoacts
a. Salt Water Intrusion
b. Pollution/Contamination
c. Envi ronmenta 1
N/A
N/A
X(l)
N/A
X
N/A
X
X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B. OFF-SITE
1. Verification of Availability
from Utility X(3)
2. Resource Caoability X
3. Imoacts
a. Salt Water Intrusion N/A
b. Pollution/Contamination N/A
c. Environmental N/A
d. Other LeQal Users N/A
FOOTNOTES: See following page.
.
21
WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT FOOTNOTES:
(I)
(2)
(3)
The applicant has indicated a non-potable demand of 3,200 GPO for the
irrigation of 1.77 acres of landscaping. The source for the irrigation
water will be a cistern located under the proposed terminal building. The
cistern will hold storm water runoff from the roof and treated waste water
from the terminal. Water from the cistern will also be used for fire
fighting purposes.
The applicant's response to Question 17, Water Supply, did not mention the
use of potable and non-potable water conservation techniques (e.g., water
conserving plumbing fixtures, xeriscaping, etc.). The District is
recommending that such techniques be incorporated into the project design
(see Recommended Development Order Conditions).
The existing Marathon Airport Terminal is currently supplied by the
Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority. Verification of the availability of
potable water from the off-site utility was supplied by the applicant in
the form of a letter from Mr. Michael Peifer, Florida Keys Aqueduct
Authority, dated May 20, 1991.' This letter was included in the ADA
submittal and contained information regarding additional piping
requirements for connection to the utility's supply lines to serve the
terminal additions.
.
22
SUBJECT: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Marathon Airport Terminal
DRI No. 91-372
Drainage Basin: N/A
Receiving Body: N/A
IACCEPTABLE I
I RESPONSE I
I IN I
I APPLICATION I
RESOLVABLE
AT PERMIT TIME
MINOR I MAJOR
I
I MAJOR I
I REG IONAll
I ISSUES I
I. SYSTEM DESIGN (1)
I
A. QUANTITY CONSIDERATIONS
I. Discharge method, location
and route to receivinQ water X
2. Floodolain encroachment N/A
3. Net basin storaQe X
4. StaQe/storaQe X
5. Control elevations X
6. Water manaQement areas X
7 . Minimum drainaQe X
8. OverdrainaQe X
9. Outoarcels N/A
10. Exfiltration X
II. Floor and road crotection X
12. PassaQe of uostream flows N/A
13. Capacity of receiving water
(ore vs. cost) N/A
B. QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS
l. Standard BMP's X I
2. Speci a 1 BMP's
a. Sensitive receivinq waters X(2) I
b. On-site use of wastewater X(3) I
c. Location of on-site
oercolation conds I N/A I
d. Proximity of on-site perco-
lation conds to SWM system I N/A I I
3. Use of natural system I X I I
4. Hazardous materials
a. Use/Qeneration X(4) I
b. ManaQement/disoosal X(4) I
5. Exfiltration systems X I
FOOTNOTES: See following page.
23
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FOOTNOTES:
(1)
(2)
(3 )
(4)
The Master Stormwater Management Master Plan was not submitted with the
ADA. The Plan was subsequently submitted to the District with Surface
Water Management Permit application No. 911023-5. The application is
currently being reviewed by District staff for compliance with District
criteria. At this time, it appears that all necessary water quantity and
quality considerations of the system design can be addressed during the
review of the permit application.
Dry pretreatment equal to 1/2" over the project area will be provided
pri~r to discharge into Class V drainage wells.
See footnote no. 1 under the Water Supply and Development checklist.
Accordi ng to the app 1 i cant's response to Question 20. B.l of the ADA,
hazardous materials will not be used, stored or generated on-site.
.
24
.
a.' ,,&......VW"-~ .......- ~ --
~
FLORIDA
BAY
HAWK
MARATHON CHANNEL
AIRPORT
o 0.5 1
~
2 aa.ES
J
~ DAMES & MOORE LOCATION MAP
-
CML ENCINEDUNGfWATER RESOuaCESfWASn: MANAGEMENT
=:~~~CES/GEOTECRNICAL ENCIHEEJUNGI
f ~--....u-&. AJlCH~
~~="y.~'lIlD
TAMPA (1\3) 17$.111.5 I'1NEU.u (IU).o.<lC7 EXHIBIT 1
25
SCALE
MAPA
o
o
~
I' I : : , ,
, w
I I
,II f I I i
~ - ,
I _J_ . .
, - f ,
'~~~
I ' ~""
t.ii
z
~
'"
f.:I ~
~!: I
~~-"
"'=a.
I~-J
~~c'
.~"'I
~"';l
'< I!
! 4;1 ,
.:::1 !
~ ;f'
~ ~
I
; I
I
J j
i
. '
; 1
.<<: <<I
a ..
~ J.
'I ,
;;. I~e
.:. .,
----- fl
1---
!
O=-
.1
!!
~i
:0,
't
it tr:ll~
Yi:'i:~',r
im- ~~;
. 'I"-'~~i:'~ '
, e ~..
~ -;~ts!sl~
- 1,'-1;",
· -~"!;l!-It ..
. !II 'I.." ~
f ;I~it;!i! :
, w i!;JirU !
.. I"y~,_"; ,
"" ..'re' ry i
~ :11 ;t:; i
~ !~Il.n~i~ I
\oJ 1I1'~,1i' ..
~ t~~II'!I;1 '
"'!.i,~.
~ iil':.JI""
~ ! I-:'ii.~yl
....... u~..I..
....
a:
C)
a..
a:
C:
z :
C) ~
~ I
<
:E
(I>
EXHIBIT 2
26
:'
I ill
Ii
--..
--
~
-,
~
1
~
~
~
.
-',
,
~_-.I
PART IV - CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SOUTH FLORIDA
Council staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Regional Plan for South Florida.
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Regional Plan, with the following
serving as examples:
.
The terminal facility will serve as a hurricane refuge. This is consistent with Goal 7.5 which
calls for adequate shelter capacity.
I
The applicant has proposed a stormwater management system which is consistent with Goal
8.1 regarding efficient water Use practices, Goal 82 regarding protection of ground water
quality and quantity, and Policy 8.4.4 regarding measures to be taken to prevent water
quality degradation.
.
.
The proposed landscaping plan will help control the spread of invasive exotic plant species
in the region and is consistent with Goal 10.1 regarding land management practices, and
specifically Policy 10.1.1 regarding the removal of invasive exotic plant species and Policy
10.1.9 regarding the promotion of using native plants in project landscaping.
.
The applicant has proposed to incorporate a series of energy conservation measures into the
project design as well as construct the project in accordance with the State Energy Code.
These steps are consistent with Goal 12.3, which calls for a per capita reduction in energy
consumption.
.
The terminal expansion will enhance intermodal linkages between' ground and air
transportation which is consistent with Policy 20.1.8.
Staff comparison of the proposed development vis-a-vis the Regional Plan for South Florida indicates
that the proposal is generally consistent with the Regional Plan.
27
PART V - SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
The Development of Regional Impact Assessment for the Marathon Airport Terminal Expansion
development indicates that the project would have the following positive regional impacts.
.
Generate a total of approximately 56 new jobs in the three south Florida counties.
.
Increase the regional economy's annual value-added by about $1.3 million.
Council evaluation indicates that the proposed project should not create adverse impacts on soils,
animal life, or vegetation, However, in terms of adverse regional impact, the project would:
.
Produce an average potable water demand of 0.0068 MGD.
.
Produce an average of 0.316 tons per day of solid waste.
.
Require a demand for 0.041 million kilowatt hours of electrical energy.
.
Produce 201 p.m. peak hour trips.
Recommenda tions
Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative iinpacts, it is the
recommendation of the Council to the Monroe County Comin'ission that the Application for
Development Approval for the Marathon Airport Terminal Exparision DR! be APPROVED subject
to incorporation of the following conditions into the development order to increase the probability
of realizing positive regional impacts and mitigating, reducing, or eliminating adverse regional
impacts.
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, ]OINfL Y OR SEVERALLY, SHALL:
1. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation:
a. Actively encourage and promote ridesharing by establishing a car and van pool
information program;
b. Encourage transit use by provision of bus shelters, development of turnout lanes, or
provision of other amenities to increase ridership concurrent with the provision of
transit services;
c. Provide on-site bicycle storage facilities to encourage use of alternative modes of
transportation; and,
d. Mulch, spray, or grass exposed areas to prevent soil erosion and minimize air
pollution.
2. Design, construct and maintain any additions, expansions or replacements to the
stormwater management system to meet the following standards:
28
a) Prior to the issuance of the development order, resolve issues regarding the proposed
stormwater cistern system and insure that the region's potable supply is not
negatively impacted.
b) Retain the first flush (at least first half inch) of runoff from project roadways, parking
lots, and loading docks in vegetated retention areas.
c) Prevent direct discharge of stormwater which has not been treated pursuant to
Condition 2b to surface waters.
d) Install pollutant retardant structures to treat all stormwater runoff at each of the
project outfall structures (down-turned pipe or other approved device) and at the
drainage structures which contribute runoff from impervious areas to surface water,
in accordance with the master drainage plan, and periodically remove pollutant
accumulations.
3. Ensure that the burrowing owls are not disturbed. Conduct educational seminars prior to
construction activity to educate workers on the appearance of the habitat of the owl and
instruct in proper avoidance measures to protect the burrowing owls.
4. Submit a final tree preservation/relocation landscaping plan for the listed species. This
plan shall be submitted to SFRPC staff for review and approval prior to the removal of any
tree or any clearing activity. This plan shall include:
· location of existing Brittle Thatch Palm, Florida Thatch Palm, Prickly Pear Cactus,
Manchineel, West Indian Mahogany and Coconut Palm;
· identification of plants and proposed site for relocation and a statement of the need
for and survival potential of the plants to be relocated;
· delineation of the preservation areas of the mangrove forest and tropical hardwood
hammock areas allow for the removal of vegetation up to 250 feet from the centerline
of the runway pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations part 77.
5. In other additional landscaping, use only those plant species identified in Exhibit 1 herein
for project landscaping. Additional species may be used in project landscaping only if
written approval is provided by Council staff. Such approval will be based on the
following criteria:
· does not require excessive irrigation or fertilizer,
· is not prone to insect infestation or disease,
· does not have invasive root systems, and,
· other criteria as may be appropriate.
As feasible use xeriscape principles in design and implementation of project landscaping.
6. Remove all exotic plant species on the terminal expansion site and associated parking area
as the expansion plan is implemented.
7. Notify state archeological officials at the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida
Department of State of construction schedules, and delay construction up to three months
29
in any area where potentially significant historical or archeological artifacts are uncovered,
and permit state and local historical preservation officials to survey and excavate the site.
8. Incorporate energy conservation measures into the design and operation of the project.
At a minimum, construct all development in conformance with the specifications of the
State of Florida Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code).
Consider using natural gas and/or renewable energy sources (e.g. solar heating) for water
heating, space heating, and cooling.
9. Limit project vehicle access points to the off-site roadway network to the number and
locations shown in Exhibit 2, hereiIl.
10. Prior to issuance of building permits, address the issue of affordable housing for low and
very low income employees of the terminal expansion and ensure that any unmet need for
these employees will be satisfied.
11. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application
for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Counci~
and one copy to the Department of Community Affairs within 30 days of the effective date
of the development order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows:
a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of
the ADA but prior to issuance of the development order, whether in response to a
formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA
will be replaced with revised pages.
b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number"
being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and
"Date" stating the date of the revision.
12. Submit an annual report to the Council, and the Department of Community Affairs on
each anniversary date of the effective date of the development order. The annual report
shall include, at a minimum a complete response to each question in Exhibit 3.
13. Record, within 30 days of the effective date of the development order, notice of the
adoption of the development order with the Clerk of the Monroe County Groot Court
pursuant to s. 380.06(15), F.S., specifying that the development order runs with the land
and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally.
14. Ensure that adequate service provisions are made available to the Marathon Airport
Terminal to meet the requirements established in the Monroe County Comprehensive
Plan.
15. Identify in the development order any approved development, including the acreage
attributable to each approved land use, open space, areas for preservation, and green belts;
and the structures and improvements to be placed on the property, including locations,
acreages, gross square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or
components of the development.
16. Establish December 31, 2003, as the date until which the Marathon Airport Terminal
Expansion Development of Regional Impact shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit
density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless it can be demonstrated substantial
changes made by the applicant in the conditions underlying the approval of the
development order have occurred, or that the development order was based on
30
substantially inaccurate information provided by the applicant, or that the change is
clearly essential to the public health, safety, or welfare.
17. Establish compliance dates, including a deadline for compliance with conditions of
approval or requirements associated with phases, and include a termination date that
reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development. For purposes of this
paragraph, physical development means development as defined in s. 380.04, F.S. The
termination date for completing development shall be December 31, 2003, provided that
the applicant, its successors, and assigns, complies with Condition 13, herein. The
termination date may only be modified in accordance with s. 380.06(19)(c), F.S.
18. Establish an expiration date for the development order.
19. Establish the effective date of the development order as 45 days from transmittal of the
development order to the Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, and applicant; provided however that if the development order is
appealed, the development order will take effect on the day after all appeals have been
withdrawn or resolved pursuant to s. 380.07(2), F.S.
20. Meet the following state criteria for issuance of a DR! development order:
a. The development order shall specify:
· The name of the development.
· The authorized agent of the developer.
· The name of the developer.
· A statement that:
The Application for Development Approval (ADA) is approved, or
The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying the conditions, or
The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for denial and changes in the
development proposal, if any, that would make it eligible to receive
development approval.
b. Findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing whether and the extent to which:
· The development unreasonably interferes with the achievement of the objectives
of an ado,pted state land development plan applicable to the area;
· The development is consistent with the local land development regulations and
the adopted local comprehensive plan;
· The development will be consistent with the recommendations of the Council DR!
Assessment pursuant to s. 380.06(14), F.S.; and,
· The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needed to
accommodate the impacts of the proposed development" or the County commits
in the development order to provide these facilities consistent with the
development schedule.
c. A legal description of the property including acreage.
31
21. In the event the applicant, its successors, or assigns violates any of the conditions of the
development order or otherwise fails to act in substantial comp6ance with the
development order (hereinafter -violator"), stay the effectiveness of the development
order as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in which the violative activity or conduct has
occurred and withhold further permits, approvals, and services for development in said
tract, or portion of the tract, upon passage of any appropriate resolution by the County,
adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The
violator will be given written notice by the County that states: 1) the nature of the
purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cwed within 15 days of said notice,
the County will hold a pub6c hearing to consider the matter within 30 days of the date of
said notice. If the violation is not cwable in 15 days, the violator's diligent good faith
efforts to cure the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a public
hearing and the development order will remain in effect unless the violator does not
diligently pursue the curative action to completion within a reasonable time, in which
event the County will give 15 days notice to the violator of its intention to stay the
effectiveness of the development order and withhold further permits, approvals, and
services as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in which the violation has occurred and until
the violation is cured. For purposes of this paragraph, the word -tract- shall be defined to
mean any area of development identified on the Marathon Airport Terminal Expansion
Master Development Plan (Exhibit 4). In addition, the phrase 'portion of a tract- means a
division of a tract into more than one ownership as created by deed or plat.
22. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of the development order
and specify monitoring procedures that, at a minimum, require development order
conditions to be reviewed by Monroe County prior to issuance of any development
permit.
23. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development Approval, as revised pursuant
to Condition 11, by reference into the development order as follows:
''The Cons06dated Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by
reference and re6ed upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under
Ch. 380, F.S., and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the representations
contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval
unless waived or modified by agreement among the County, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, and the app6cant, its successors, or assigns.-
24. Incorporate the Council DRI Assessment by reference into the development order.
25. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the development order.
32
CJ)
~
Q)
>
o C'tS
u~
-o~
C..Q
~u..
O..c:
~....
<.J~
..... 0
~ -0 fJ)
HC
1lQ-~
H \101 0
~ ....~
r::lCJ)
Q)-o
CQ)
'--0
>C
....Q)
CJ)E
-gE
..co
fJ)~
o~
....
CJ)
.-
.....J
...... --
~ -
~ ...... ~
~ w >
co ................. QI .....
.... ........ w w a. .... ........
....... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c.
... CO~ 0.0 --
QI ~ ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ G C
<II QI ~ III 0 0 III '0 ~
M ~" W ~ W ~ ~
~ ~ QlIII>-<II..c... w
""..c.a::l w 1II0~
j I ; i ; i I I ! !
j j j J i j i j j j
--
Lt"l
CO
0'1
.-
>-
~
~
......
.. ......
e ....
~ ~
~ ~
0. ~
w ......
~ ~ w
~ ~ ~
~ Co ~
.... 0
e u ..
~ ...., e
..c .,
i I !
J j j
......
w
QI
:0
o
~
....
....
....
QI
..c
(I)
....,
c.
C.
<II
j
......
w
~
CO
e
-
CO
..c
u
w
o
f-<
......
......
>-
w
w
~
.a
<II
.,
e
..
<II
....
...
..c
u
......
I
i J
......
e
w
QI
....
......
....
....
.,
-
I
>-
e
o
l>o
......
......
.,
<II ....
::l e
CO '0
lit CO
... ~
., .a
0.
III )C
-0: ~
...... ...
....,
-Ie
e
;:l
....
e
o
e
-0:
I; I~
~~ .,
<II w
....
'0
w
< -0:
-Ie
--
....
...
::l
C.
...
QI
...... ...,
>- =- e
w 0 .,
w "". u
~ ...., ~
.a w_
- ~ QI
~ ~ ~
U ""'::l
: ~~ ;: ~
o ~ -.: ~
..c
......
>-
~
~
o
~
&:C
......
e
;:l
....
..
.,
! ~
I j ~
w
o
....
o
U
<II
....
."
......
.,
QI
....
....
-
>
e
.,
CO
:>
o
lQ
....,
c.
c.
'"
i
ClI
...... III
......e
__ w
> 0
t
.
--
..c
III
:>
.0
QI
...
-
...
..c
<II
:>
.0
...
QI
......
...
'"
U
(I)
....,
--
'"
...
QI
......
....
...
QI
..c
U
(I)
....,
j
......
~
e
-
>
......
>-
~
~
....
~
......
>-
.....
...... .....
...... >- 0
... ..... ..c
QI .....
:a ........... C
o <II..... 0
.... ::l 0.
""'" (J '"' ::I
_ C <II QI .
....... ~.... "'C ~ en
..... ......... '" ..a ... QI
..c>. ....a. 'toot....
"'.......cll:len ......
::.:...... u......,___ to 0
'-" ..... CO -Ie >: ~ ~
~~e:loj-le !
... -r1 '+-4 r""'4 m-e C
s.. U ,.... C .... r""'4 ." ....
e ......,,......... I'd Om
:> C III U X e
> o. ,.............cU"-'cu
c.
I i I I I ! ~ a j ~
~I
..,
.,
o
...
.....
-
~
...
......
>-
.....
......
-
......
......
...
ClI
..,
~
~
..c
<II
...
.,
Ii
>-
~
....
w
~
..
-
:>
&:C
......
......
>-
....
......
-
.....
.....
...
~
...,
.....
~
..c
<II
...
.,
X
.....
:0
o
....
.....
~
>-
.....
...
<II
.,
o
U
.
~
en
......
I
......
..c
<II
:>
.a
e:
::l
.,
~
.0
......
'0
o
o
:-
e
o
...
..
::l
.a
......
..,
o
o
:0
C
o
...... ...
e ......_
::l C:>
i I ! 11
J;I'~j!
jfiJJj~
......
QI
C
-
>
...
~
>
.....
~
en
.....
......
.,
~
<II
<II
III
U
.....
.....
co
.
~
...
33
......
GI
c:
...... ....
lQ Ei
.... III
...... .... lQ
>. .... .....
...
... c: GI
GI lQ ... .......
...... ..Cl ....... .... ftI Ei
lQ a -.::l ... ~
.... c: ~ ...... ....... c: GI C
.... III .... III GI .... -.::l ... '"
lQ .... ,Q, .... .... ...... GI ~ lQ
... ~ ..>I ..>ol ... Q/ .... ..Cl U
lQ ...... c: bO '" cJ CJ III .... c: .... U
GI .... c: ...... ... =' ~ GI ... 0 > ='
... GI .... ~ III III III :a c: l..) >.
=' .... GI .... 0 -.::l >. >. tlI ..... 01 ......
0 .... ... ... Q, .... III Q/ .; :z: ...... =- III QI
.... 0 .... 01 ...... QI ....... c: c: GI ...... '" ....... ..>ol III e
.... u ..c: Q >. Q/ ... 0 0 .... c: III III In c: Q/ ....
tlI :a ..... ... u :a GI .c ..c: bO .... .... Q/ oJ 01 .... ....
a:l ...... ~ ... tlI 0 -.::l >. <II > .... '1:> '" '1:> QI .......
..... '1:> .... .; QI .... .... Q/ III Q/ lQ bO .... .... 0 c: c: GI ."
GI .... ..Cl ..>ol .... CJ Q, Q, ... c: ..>ol lQ 0 '" .... .... ....
<< GI :a .... ...... ..>ol u QI lQ tlI ... .... CJ ... c: '" II) Q, ... ....
tlI =- ~ '1:> c: Q/ >- >. u l..) GI :.: 0 >. .... GI ..... lI) c: :a
c: .... ..... c: III .... Z ..... 01 ...., ..... f-o ..... .... ..c: e II) 0 .....
lQ GI I tlI Q/ ..... ..... a:l ..... l..) f-o In ..... '" 0
.... ... co:: ..c: ~ ..... j j i ..... ..... tlI I i l..) j
... GI ..... ;II I ...... I In J t .....
=' ..>ol 0 ..c: tlI In '" ~
0 CJ J ... <II E QI J
.... .... ... ~ .... ... Q,
.... 0. -< ... ... Q, Q,
~ ..... ..... .... .... >. III
I GI I ~ j ... l..) I
tlI a:l tlI ..... i I
I .... ..... E i i I I
... I j t 0 I
QI J J tlI ....
'1:> j c: Q/ ~I
GI tlI ..c: j ~I
... .... CJ
c: ... 01
0 ~ ...
0. II) f-o
.......
....... Q/
>> c:
... ....
... Q,
QI
...... ..Q ....... >.
<II >. c ...
... tlI ~ c:
GI a:l ... ='
Q, ...... ....... '1:> 0 .......
.... ...... '" ... ~ c: c: l..) '1:>
c: QI 111 QI ... Ql tlI
=' ...... .... c Q, .... GI ....... ....... '0 QI III
.., ... ... 111 Q, ...... ... .... In ....... ... 0 '1:> ..Cl
..... Q/ ... ... 0 tlI ... III ....... ..c: III .... lQ ..>ol
Q, >. ....... c ... .c >> c: tlI tlI ... bO .... Q CJ
...... 1 .... :Ie '" 111 III ~ e 0 ... .... tlI c: ..c: ..... tlI
tlI c: . c .... .. bO Ei III .... Co ....
c: ~ III 01 ...... c: .... )( In 0 ... bO j lQ .......
...... .... ..., Q, ... .... .... 0 ... '" 0 0 ... =- ..... In
'1:> ... OIl C ... ... III 0 =- a:l ." Q/ ..c: a ='
0 bO Q/ ... '" 111 =' Q, .c ..... c: Q, :!' u ::I I ....... Q,
0 QI ... U .... ~ ... e tlI c: 0 III ... 0 .... ...
:a ... 0 ...., ....... .... .., ... i :z: 0. c: 0 .... c: lQ
GI Q/ ..c: .... .. >. lI) ..... Q/ ..... ..... Q/ f-o .... >. tlI CJ
0 0. lI) '" ... Q/ .... ..... ..c: Q/ ..... Ql ... Q, 0
.., ..... ..., i 01 I > '.... << ... '" I ~ l..) III .... ~
..... =- .... .... J lQ ~ I 0 << ..... .... bO 0
'" I ... Q ... ....I ... 0 ..... I ... c: lloo
j tlI ~ ..... 0. ..., 0 II) ... OIl tlI .....
." ..... .... ..... ... ci. > ...
.... J i .... , ra. <<
.... '" .... ~ Co I ,=' ..... ci.
.... .... Ul
... Q, ~ Q,
.... Q, lQ i I Q, III
~ In J CJ 1 Q,
E 1= i i I J In J
; I I I I
j j ... QI J ~ ~
... 0. ~I
lQ ....
....I ....I
.
34
-- --
..,
5 0
..... 0 41
~ :- II)
-- Q, e ='
e 0 --
-- ..... ...... ... ... ..... ...
Ql III 41 ::l ... lG ~
Q, Q, 41 e =' .... ""
~ .. 0 A ... QI
... ... ... u e u
bO QI 0 ... QI
-- > Q, U QI .., ""
e ::1 ..... =' > ...... -- -- - QI
C'tS =' ... u e ..... e III III -- cd II) ...... ...
..... III III .. ~ .... ...... ::l ... ... bO Ql Ql lG
"'0 Q, 41 Q, CI:I <G ..... Ql Ql - ..... .. ...... "" e
.... <G ... ...... ....., ...... e Q, Q, Q, .... ..... QI e ...
e '" .., ... >. .., 41 <G -- Q, Q, - .. <G lG QI
~ 0 Ql ...... - =' '" 0 QI - lG ... 0 0 .... > ......0 ... .. ..c
QI ..... QI ... ell :II: 0 -", .. u e '" ... ...... ... III Ql .:aI.... - ...... III ...
0 bO Co 0 ..... ....., :- QI ... e cd =' ...... III >. III QI ... III > >. u ::l
...... - bO III ..... e u - - r::r Ql .. .... bO 0'" I ..... III 0
- Ql '" - ... '"' i ... 0 - .. 0 ::l 0 QI Ql ... .c 0 e ..... ..., VI
u... ..... ....., lI'l bO ....., ... ... 41 Q, Cl ...I ... ... Ql III ... III .:ale ::l 0 ....., .....,
Q, ....., e ... Ql bO ....., ..... ... ... A - .. .:aI .... e .c
Q, '" III I '" ::l II) .... ..... .c c 0 c - . bO I I
.J:: '" - I Ql Q, lI'l QI '" '" I ..... ::a .., '" .c <<f Cl:lQI - C
..... <Il ...... Cl >. ... cd ...... 41 Q, CI:I lI'l ......41 ...I 0
~ ..c 0 ....., >. ! ...... 0 0 .. II:: CI:I ....., ....., .. ...... 0
:J u '" III II:: ..... 0 i ...... ..... Ill'" .c
... .... ftI E ::l I ....., .... u I j ... ! cd
0 - II) ... ... .... ..... ftI j III 41 Q
"" ... 41 U ... ... II) ::lbO .....
....., .... i Ql j QI Q. =' A"
CJ) > .... I ... ... .... o III J
~ .... > I Ql ftI Q, c .......
"" =' J J ..... j III 0
~ I I u t 1= 1 I
0 ftI j I e
A >< j j j ::l
0 j - .....> u
....... j ..... e ~I .... cd
0 j 0 > - ~
"'0 (J ..... ftl
(J Ql ::l
Cl) 0 Q Cl Cl
u
-0 -
l/")
C CO
Cl) Cl"
E ....
,
E >- --
~ a
~ .....
0 e ftl
.... Q,
U lG ...
Co
Cl) ftl
..... U
~ 41 III
A <<f
lG bO
r.J) II) ftl
..,
Q) 41 '"
Co :II:
Cl) '" --
u -- ,;
r= -- ..c &
E e -- 01 ..... ....
..... .... =' '" ftl ......
..... '" -- .... .. Q, Q, ...... 0
lG Q, 41 ::l A -- -- .... -- ....
....... -- Co > -- Q, 41 ..c -- e Ql ftl ftl 0 41
0 ftl e 0 '" ... ..... III ...... III ftI 41 C 41 .... bO
- -- (J Ql .. ... Ql ... ::l C & ... ... QI ..... 41 ;
U '" .... Ql bO QI .., ... ... 0 ...... ..... ... ... c -- bO
~ ftI .... ... ::l C ..... =- 0 A e ... ftl C < - 41 C f'"
u (J 0 0 ftI .... -- 0 A 41 ftl Ql Q, ftI .:aI ....., ... a ftl
r.J) <<f ftI .. ..... e ... Ql -- "" ..... c ;. 41 .... III - f'" III
(J =' Ql > 0 ...... ... ... c 0 .., Q, - ... VI .... .....
.- .c lG lG .:aI ..c - A e u ... ... .c ..... 0 01 J ..... III 0
....J u -- Q, u u .... 5 ..... ftl Ql 0 U III 0 ... >. ..... Ql
ftl ... ftl ...... lG <Il 0' - '" ..... .. lQ .c =' 01 i III 0 C
QI Ql ..... ..... ....., ..... Q, '" '"' ...... .., c -- Ql C4 III ~ III C
lQ 41 ..... ~ lQ ".:aI ....., ..... QI ftI III ....., 0 ..... c ...
....., :- ... ..... I u 0 0 ... - .., A ::l .... C X
<Il .., '" A "tl ~ I :a ..... - 0 ... .... I - ......
... ..... 0 I ..... e c ...... 0 41 :c j ....., x
1 Q, lQ ::l .... Cl U ...... ....., I
j <G ....., Cl '" ! ..... ....., J
CI:I ..... Q. I
..... ... t e i1 ::l
j I Q,
~ Ql '" III I
.c J
I c I
e 0 J
::l j e j
... j 41
... ... i
~I j j III ~I j 01 j ~ ~ ~ ~
ftl ~ -
(J .....
cu .....
... lG
< U
.
35
......
QI
0
..c::
'"
Ii!
...... ...... QI
Ii! >. ..,
..... C -
...... '" '" III
e 0. bO ...... '" ......
..... 0 QI ...... QI Ii! ......
III W ..c:: QI ...... .., III ...... ..... a
Co ::I ...... '" w .., C e III .....
..c:: Ii! e ...... .. C 0 ; ..... Co ca
III .. ...... ..... ...... ." - a ca ...... D..
- w QI '" QI III ..... .. s.. ..... <II D.. e .c
.c <( > 0. QI <II 0 QI '" III w ..... u c:
.. <J ...... 0 ...... ...... w - bO Co e ... .r:: lIS .. 0
0 III ~ W ...... ... e 0 .. '0 e '" ... <J Q, ., ..
w ::c '" t>O e ., .... .. r:: .... ::I E-< ., '" ... ..c: bO
.... ....... 0 c .... >>. '" ... QI .... 0 W <J - '" ..c:: .. ...... C
., ., '" 0 Q, QI III ... '" - ... .r:: <J e -
QI - QI a 0. w e - ... QI - Co s.. ... ... ., .... ..c:
CIl - > <II ..... .., UI QI ~ .., 0 0 '" .., '" III
....... W - '0 .... C bO os ., QI W C r:: w '" III ..c:: - Q, os
::I ..:l QI '" ., '" 0. W ~ E-< - .... E-< ....... >>. E-< w ~
I .r:: ....... ~ >. A .a ., ....... ....... '" ....... ..... Q/ ....... 0 .r:: .......
.. ....... 0 ::I .a =- "" ....... I :.: ... <J
W I ~ u '" '" ....... I j I ~. ...... ....... t llI. ... i
III j ....... ....... U en ~ III ....... '"
<J ....... ....... j III - ~ ..c::
., ~ j QI - E-<
E I i '.. III .......
0. -
I j >. w ci.
u w
t I III ....... 0 Q, I
I I ., I - j e fII
.0 os os ..... i J
I J ::I - - III )( J )(
0 ::I ::I C III '"
~I .. .J:J .a - c c
'" QI Q/ e - -
e .J:J .0 W W W
.... ., III QI .r:: .c
CIl E-< E-< E-< E-< E-<
......
...... e
CII ...
r:: '"
- 0.
Q,
...... ...... >.
...... ...... ...... c ...... ..c:: '" w
.., QI <J ...... W ., UI r:: w
0 ...... > - Q/ 0 C '" ...... '" Q/
0 CII 0 ...... ...... ... .... ..c:: III .... .., - ..r::
=- .... w .., .., III ... .. - UI 0 <J <J
C ... bO C C ...... '" .. u 0 r::
0 w c .... - >. ::c '>. e c UI ?o - '"
.. >. III ...... ...... w w ..... ....... e QI - >. 0 ..,
.... ::c a '" e ., '" ..... ..... 0 <II 0 Q, -
. - .... e e - e )( III Co :.: .., w
~ QI CII W '" ...... '" os .., ::I '" III ....... .... 0
<J Co .. os 0. e .. .. e =- ::I ;lo III ...... ...... s.. ....
III '" - <J .... '0 - W 0 ...... '" <J >- - '" llI.
... W .c - III '" .., '0 .... III C QI .... QI QI - .... r:: ~ .....
l:Q U ~ .... ..... Q, ..... .... -' III s.. .., ..... ...... c .a III .... '"
..... ....... ....... - III .... - ~ - QI ....... CII CII - - e 0 0. ....... 1
.... ::I '" ~ ~ ....... .., ...... .r:: >- C 0. s.. III .... -
e ... ~ ..... u .... ....... ....... - III ... ... ....... - oS .., IQ bO i
::I ~I ::I .... '" II) .. C ::I III 0. ..r:: <J ....... ....... C
QI c.:l ..:l :::I III ~ - Q/ '" 0 ... ... III '"
.. ....... ....... <J .... III 0 C CIl III ~I '0 ., ~ 1 I w
.. - III r:: .... ., ....... QI C ..... eo.
QI t ... ..:l C QI l:Q .... '" CIl '" .......
.... i ....... QI E C ....... III ::I CIl ....... ,>
e os 0 .. u ....... ...
I '" ... III .r:: .. ... QI os l ~ ~ ci. I
- I ci. .c '" .., i ....
E III .J:J r:: - r J 0.
QI Q, .J:J QI .. llJ
0 UI '" '0 QI r:: .. I
.. J J .. 0 <J 0 j
., '" '" '" .r:: 1Il.r:: ~ '"
ell .... .... .... ~ <J ~ CE-< -
.. .. '" '" .... - - ~I ~I ~I C
QI '" ::I :::I ..... ... jj ~ 0
U <J U C II) W III
'" - - - '" '" <Il -
..:l ..:l ..:l ..:l ::c ::c '" ""
.
36
c
(
"'"_"::-"_--~------'''''''"~~''''\UI''. _
- n' _ ._ __'_ .. - - _. - _. - - - ... ... .- ..- -.. ... ... .- -. -" no .... ... ... -.0 .
:-..~:::::""___......_.........r J= ~~ ".. ~ : .. ;.:-..::.:.-_____--->: = = = ;:~:;;...:i:::::::::=__:..::.....~....=:::'\"'''''\\\\~~:.I::::;:.:~:::~:=_:~-=~~::L'~ ,.;, -::.;:.::=::;::::':::::~::~.....:_
.-. - .- ... -
"......~:.I".... /'
\/"
.__/~ ;;'~---.."......~.
,./
!
I
""''''r;,'!'''
0;. ','
.:.....~..............."!'~...,r.._....
*
PROJECT ACCESS
EXHIBIT
2
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Councif
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
~ Project Access
~"".""
"/:Ntt.,,
Not to
Scale
Source: ADA
37
EXHIBIT 3
FORM RPM-BSP-ANNUAL REPORT-l
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNuAL REPORT
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, places the
responsibility on the developer of an approved development of
regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the
local government, the regional planning agency, the Department of
Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the
date specified in the development order. The failure of a
developer to submit the report on the date specified in the
development order may result in the temporary suspension of the
development order by the local government until the annual report
is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to
all developments of regional impact which have been approved
since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this
required report, call the DRI Planner at (904) 488-4925.
Send the original completed annual report to the designated
local government official stated in the development order with
one copy to each of the following:
a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction;
b) All affected permitting agencies;
c) Division of Resource Planning and Management
Bureau of State Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
38
Format your Annual Status Report after the format example
prov idea be 1 0"" .
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reporting Period:
to
Month/Day/Year
Month/Day/Year
Development:
Name of DRI
Location:
City
County
Developer: Name:
:Jompany Name
Address:
Street Location
City, State, Zip
1. Describe any changes made in the p~oposed plan of
development, phasing, '~ in the representations contained in
the Application for Development Approval since the Develop-,
ment of Regional Impact received approval. Note any actions
(substantial deviation determinations) taken by local
government to address these changes.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit A a detailed description of each change and copies
of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit A should also
address the following additional items if applicable:
a)
Describe changes in the plan of development or
phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequ~nt
years;
b)
State any kno~n incremental DRI applications for
development approval or requests for a substantial
deviation determination that were filed in the reporting
year and to be filed during the next year;
39
c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a
development order or the subsequent modification of an
adopted development order that was recorded by the
developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15) (f), F.S.
2) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for
any portion of the development sinc~ the development order
was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted
a new pevelopment of Regional Impact development order for
the project? Provide a copy of the order adopted by the
annexing local government.
3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site
plans, etc., not previously submitted.
Note: If a response is to be more than one or t~o sentences,
attach as Exhibit B.
4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed
and actually conducted for the reporting year as well as a
cumulative total of development proposed and actually
conducted to date.
Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve-
ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross flqQr area constructed,
barrels of storage capacity completed, p~rmits obtained, etc.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit c.
5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other
than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate
entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and
the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved.
Tract
Buyer
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit D.
6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the
original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to
issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its
size, and intended use on a site plan and map.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit E.
40
7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits ~hich
have been obtained, applied for, or denied during this
reporting per~od. Specify the agency, type of permit, and
duty for each.
NOTE: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit F.
8) Provide a list specifying each development order condition
and each developer commitment as contained in the ADA and
state hq~ and vhen each condition or commitment has been
complied vith during the annual report reporting period.
NOTE: Attach as Exhibit G.
9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the
development order to be included in the annual report.
10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been
sent copies of the annual report in conformance vith
Subsections 380.06(15) and (18), F.S.
Person completing the questionnaire:
Title:
Representing:
.
41
c
:~~..~:::~~:;;;~;~::~::::.:.:::::..~~.it~~-~~f~~:~~~=~~:.'~,':':::,~...;:;~;5=M~;::~M~~.;-~,~~1:::t:'
".:~~...""":::.._,;,,...:,:'!. ,:-":...;,"~;"'_~t<<'"f;'~"mt"';;~/H":,
~ .. /,.1'
I
.
^.,w'
;:I~~~~
'1!}v
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
EXHIBIT
4
South
Florida
Regional ,
Planning
Cound[
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
.
Source: ADA
Not to
Scale
42
EXHIBIT D
FORM RPM-BSP-ANNliAL REPORT-l
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, places the
responsibility on the developer of an approved development of
regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the
local government, the regional planning agency, the Department of
Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the
date specified in the development order. The failure of a
developer to submit the report on the date specified in the
development order may result in the temporary suspension of the
development order by the local government until the annual report
is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to
all developments of regional impact which have been approved
since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this
required report, call the DRI Planner at (904) 488-4925.
Send the original completed annual report to the designated
local government official stated in the development order with
one copy to each of the following:
a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction;
b) All affected permitting agencies;
c) Division of Resource Planning and Management
Bureau of State Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Format your Annual Status Report after the format example
,prov.ided be 1 0"'" .
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reporting Period:
to
Month/Day/Year
Mont.h/Day/Year
Development:
Name of DRI
Location:
City
County
Developer: Name:
:lotnpany Name
Address:
Street Location
City, State, Zip
1. Describe any changes made in the p~oposed plan of
development, phasing, ~ in the representations contained in
the Application for Development Approval since the Develop-,
ment of Regional Impact received approval. Note any actions
(substantial deviation determinations) taken by local
government to address these changes.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit A a detailed description of each change and copies
of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit A should also
address the following additional items if applicable:
a}
Describe changes in the plan of development or
phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequ~nt
years;
b}
State any known incremental DRI applications for
development approval or requests for a substantial
deviation determination that were filed in the reporting
year and to be filed during the next year;
2}
Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a
development order or the subsequent modification of an
adopted development order that was recorded by the
developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15) (f), F.S.
Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for
any portion of the development sinc~ the development order
was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted
a new pevelopment of Regional Impact development order for
the project? Provide a copy of the order adopted by the
annexing local government.
c}
3)
Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site
plans, etc., not previously submitted.
Note: If a response is to be more than one or t~o sentences,
attach as Exhibit B.
4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed
and actually conducted for the reporting year as well as a
cumulative total of development proposed and actually
conducted to date.
Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve-
ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross flqQr area constructed,
barrels of storage capacity completed, p~rmits obtained, etc.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit c.
5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other
than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate
entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and
the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved.
Tract
Buyer
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence; attach
as Exhibit D.
6} Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the
original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to
issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its
size, and intended use on a site plan and map.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit E.
7). List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which
have been obtained, applied for, or denied during this
reporting per~od. specify the agency, type of permit, and
duty for each.
NOTE: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit F.
8) Provide a list specifying each development order condition
and each developer commitment as contained in the ADA and
state hqw and ~hen each condition or commitment has been
complied ~ith during the annual report reporting period.
NOTE: Attach as Exhibit G.
9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the
development order to be included in the annual report.
10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been
sent copies of the annual report in conformance with
Subsections 380.06(15) and (18), F.S.
Person completing the questionnaire:
Title:
Representing:
.
EXHIBIT &-
c
~~~:=~~::~~::.:::..~~ ":'" ~..="=, ~~~~~[~~-=5'~i.;~~~~~~~~..~..:~:::~::::~;;"",,:~:::~~~:;::::t~~:~;:.~ '. '" ~~~:;;;::~;::~:."..,-
- -- "";;"""'0,-\". :';~__""__"____"",",I"_"'W"_' ....."':""ft~......-.........,-;..
'"'""'-~:.&', /', ';. ...... .
~;. jJ
.
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Counci[
PROJECT ACCESS
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
~ Project Access
Source: ADA
~.:::::.,
::::::::::"':"':':::;:::;'.
Not to
Scale
eJ'J
"-
(1)
>
o ('0
U\:J
.-
\:J"-
c:.2
~u..
O.c
"-~
lJ~
\:JO
c:fJ) an
c:o
('0"- 0'1
0 -
eJ'J ........... ,
(1)\:J ~
~
C:(1) ~
.- \:J
>c:
.....(1)
eJ'JE
.gE
"-0
.J::.u
fJ)(1)
...... 0::::
0
~
eJ'J
.-
....J
EXHIBIT F
'"'
..
c
....
'"'" >
>-
.... ..,
.... III
o 0
.c ~ '"'
.... ~
c _ ..
o III ..,
e. ~ ....
:;J ..
III '"'
>. lit .. .c
.. .. lit
- .." J.4
~ .... '"
0"11
....
tIO .c ...
III III
tIO ~ nI
C '" 0
- x u
C ..., III
~ ..
o III
X ......
...,
'"'" '"' '"'
........ ...........c>.. ....... ......... >-
'" ... Ill.... >. ~ ....
..... ........ u ~............ GI f"""4
...... ....>..Q..... ...... >............
ftS ........ .........,..... 41.......... OUl......
I.t ........... ...c............ w ............:2
· C t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
GI . ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ . c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:.c~ ~ lIJ ~lIt~:; :.'"'~ :::....::2:::'5e~
lit .........c_ Cl>.'O='>......_1lI
... era...."'c ....................c:ao f'""4Q1
C ..............A...... ......Q,I.....,~ cQ
~ .c ce. 0..............,
III ." III ........
> lie. IlQ nI >- C
~ ..., -
...... Cl
...,
j J J J j j j j j j j j I I Ii' : J f j j ~ !
"'"
."
0
0
'"' >
C
.c 0
III ...
:;J ...
'"' .0 :;J
ow >. '"' .0
ow ... ..,
=' :;J 0 ...
'"' '"' e. III 0 III
... "'" '"' '"' '" ... III > >
C ow >- '"' tV ... .. .0 '"'" C ....
III '" ~ '"' .... QI QI '"'" .., .. 0 -
.... .. ... C - .... .... >. > C C '"' ... III
e. .... QI .... III .... ow ... 0 tV - iii '"' ... ...,
... '"' .0 .. OJ - ow ... "" u > :;J C :;J
QI .. ... '"' ... .... . > .. .. ...... - '"' .... 0 .. I
.... e. III ... III III >- C .c .a ... OJ tV e. OJ
.... a. II .. nI III - C tV <J ... .. .. - 0 0 C "'"
- 0 > II :;J C 0 tIO III II) ~ e. II) u ~ .. IlO
C U ... 0 '"' ... IlO g. "" :;J ...... =' & III 0 U QI nI
QI ..., C .... .... III nI ...... 0 u ..., :;J tV U ...... ... ....
.c nI ow .. - ... Q/ IlQ 1 0 ... '"' u ...... Cl ow
U .. .c tIO ... tV .a I ..., ..:I I f-o '" ..., ... ...,
...... J a. .... C .c a. ..., ...... - j I ....
.. .... - U III >c e. III .. '"' ! ! III
! .... II tIO ...... < Q/ ~ .. lIJ J III ....
~ .c ..... co; a. I III III -
...... III .c !~ ..., <0 U to a.
...... u e. ..., .... on
e. ... .. 1IO ...,
e. 0 e. e. .c .. >
e. f-o " ," e. I tV e.
III a. ..., a. J ....c J J j III J J
J J j III J II) -.... a. ..., a.
.. Ul > 0 j lIJ J III
J I j: j t j j j ~ j
0
.......
'"
....
.-t
'"
w
'"
w
='
o
.....
.-t
'"
lQ
~
....
>.
...
...
tI
..a
.......
"
.-t
....
.-t
.......
tI
C
....
a
'"
'"
......
c
"
....
..,
c
.....
Q/
..
'"
...
Q/
..,
Q/
.....
C
o
u
~
.......
Q/
Q/
.....
....
o
u
.......
..
....
....
....
III
w
>.
..:
foo
.......
II
='
c
s..
::s
~
....
>
III
=- ..
j: ~ ~ ~
.., III .., tI .......
.... 0 C C QI
o cG.........
C III en c....
.... 41 "" CJ') c:
S en __ 0
-- to 0
I
.....
a
i ~ ~ 0;
~ I c. :;l :;l
ctoO ....... <J u
.... c:: .......... =' :3
..... ." QI en rtI
tI .-t 0 "0 >. >.
w~ ~,..... QI cu
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c C
":0 >- <II wO 0
:a __ ... <J:a Q/": ..:
.., ~ ~~~ tI QI
:: -= .......~ ~Qlu:; :i
.......
"
u
u
::s
>.
...
..
Q/
=-
.......
QI
....
...
c
"
::E:
.....
QI
C
....
>
III
....
toO
>.
..,
...
...
Q/
foo
--
.......
"0
QI
QI
=-
.-t
III
...
III
~
U
....
""
--
..
toO
C
....
:.:
~
~
u
o
....
u
--
to
..,
C
'"
....
...
='
o
.....
......
'"
~
S
::s
.
...
j
..,
or<
w
III
"0
Q/
..
C
o
""
w
foo
.....
-- III
>. C
... or<
... C.
Q/
..... ~ ..... >.
'" >- C ...
... III ::s c
Q/ lQ ... '"
C. ....... ....... "0 0 .......
.... ....... ....... .. ~ C t.: U ..,
C " III III w III III
::s ....... .... c c. ...... III ....... ....... "0 III III
.., w .. " Co ....... .. ... .. ....... ... 0 ." ..Q
-- QI ... ... 0 III ... .. ..... ..: QI .-t III ~
Co >. ..... c .. ..Q >. c III III ... toO .... 0 u
..... << .... 2: III " .. III a 0 .. .... III C .c -- III
III i c , C .... u .. l>O a III .... Cl. .....
C =' tI .., ...... c .... )( .. o. w toO j III .....
..... .... ..... Co .. ... ... 0 ... III 0 0 w =- ,; -- '"
.., ... II C .. w .. 0 =- III "0 Q/ ..: '"
0 l>O tI ... III III '" Co ..Q ...... C C. ... u ::s << ....... Cl.
0 III ... U .-t ~ ... & III C 0 III ... 0 t .... ...
:a ... 0 ..... ....... .... .., ... J 2: "" C 0 .... C III
III III .<: ..... .. ->. ell ...... Q/ ..... -- III foo .... >. III u
0 "" en .. w III .... '-' .c GI -- Q/ ... C. 0
.., ~ -- j III I > .... .. - j i '" U III .... ..,
-- ~ .... .... J III ::s <::1 oj( -- .... toO 0
I J i w ...J .. 0 -- i ... C D.o
j "" ..... 0 cn << III III --
~ .... ...... j ci. > ...
J << .... ra. oj(
<< j .... ~ Cl. I ...... .
.... '" Cl.
a. =' a.
Cl. III j t Cl. 01
'" J u I Cl.
J I j f i J J J 01 J
J J j w QI J j
"" i j
~ ~I
.......
III
e
....
.....
."
....
....
:a
--
...... .....
EI "0
~ 0 GI
0
III :0 III
..... Q, C :::I
EI 0 .....
..... .... ...... ... .. .... ...
CII III 41 :::I .. .. III
Q, Q, 41 C :::I .... "0
1II w 0 .0 .. CII
... ... .. <.J C <.J
tlO CII 0 ... 41
...... > Q, <.J CII "0 "0
B :1 .... :::I > ..... ..... ..... ..... .... CII
('tS :::I .... <.J C .... a III III ...... 1II III ..... ...
.... III III W III .... ..... :::I W ... tlO " 41 <0
~ g, Gl Q, <n 1II .... " CII .... .... w ...... '0 C
.... III ... ...... ...... ...... c g, Q, Q, .... .... " C ...
C III "0 .. >. '0 41 1II ...... Q, Q, .... w .. '" CII
oi:: 0 CII ...... .... :::I III 0 c GI .... <0 .. 0 0 .... > .....0 .. w .J::
- " .... GI ' ... c:Q X 0 III w <.J C III OJ ...... .. III " oX.... .... ..... .. OJ
0 110 Q, 0 ..... ..... :- Gl .. C III :::I ..... III >. III Gl ... .. > >. <.J ::l
...... .... tlO 10 .... C <.J .... .... c:r QI W ~ tlO 0" I .... .. 0
- " A. .... W roo j . 0 .... w 0 :::I 0 QI " w .J:: 0 e .... ., <n
u... ~ ..... lQ tlO ..... i: .. ... " Q, e ..J ... .. GI III .. III oXC :::I 0 ...... ......
g, ...... .. CII 110 ..... .. .... .Q .... W .0( .... C .J::
g, I '" I III :::I III .... .... .J:: C 0 C .... a 110 I I
.J:: '" I GI Q, IQ c Gl .. j it .... ::a 'CI III .c III eIlGl ... C
Ul ..... t:I >. j III ...... " Q, Ul IQ ....." ..J 0
.- .c ..... >. I I ..... 0 ... Ill: <n ...... ...... ... ..... 0
;::, <.J III llI:: 0 i ..... ...... Ii .J::
.. j II J ...... u I j i !
0 .... C ...... j j
"" J j ......
.....
c./') m J , ci. I
Q,
J J , III I Ii J j
'- J I J j j J
0 j j j j
.... j j ~
~ j ~
(1)
~ -
Lt')
c: CO
(1) ~
E ....
,
E >- .....
~ II
~ ...... ....
0 a III
- ~ Q,
U <0
Q, ...
(1) III
~ <.J
0::: GI III
.0 :0
<0
rJ) III III
"0
(1) Gl 1II
Q, X
(1) '"
U ...... ...... ,;
~ ..... .c &
sa S ..... III .... ....
.... .... :::I <0 III ......
.... III ..... .... w g, Q, ...... 0
01 Q, CII ::l .0 ..... ...... .... ...... ~
.... ...... g, > ...... Q, " .c ..... c III III III 0 III
0 1II C 0 II ... .... III ...... III II III C Gl .... llG
.... ...... u QI ... W III .. :::I C S .... w CII .... CII :;
<.J II ... III llG Gl "0 ... ... 0 ..... .... ... ... C ...... llG
+oJ 1II .... .. :::I C .... :- 0 .0 e ... 1II C -< .... III C fo4
<.J <.J 0 C1 III .... ...... 0 .0 CII III QI Q, 01 oX ...... .. . "
rJ) III II w ...... a .... " ..... "" .... c :- Gl .... .. .... fo4 II
<.J :::I " > 0 ...... ...... .. .. C 0 -.::l g, ... j Ul .... ....
0- .J:: II 01 . oX .c .... ..0 S U ... .... .J:: .... 0 III '"' " 0
-J <.J ..... A. Ii <.J <.J ~ Ii .... III III 0 <.J III 0 W >. .... III
" .. III ..... :::I II Ul ,0 ... II .... ... c:Q .J:: :::I III i " 0 C
GI III .... C ~ ..... .... g, " '"I ...... "0 C ...... QI '"I III ~ CII C
c:Q 41 .... ~ c:Q oX .c ...... .... QI II III ..... 0 ..... C ....
...... :0 .... ..... I u 0 0 ! ... -.::l .0 :::I .... C X
Ul '0 II .0 '0 . :a .... ... 0 j roo I .... .....
I ..... 0 I .... II C I ..... 0 " ::1:1 ..... X
Q, IQ :::I .... U U ...... ...... .
j III ..... U ... I ...... ..... I t
<n ..... ci. .
...... << t J I I
e j I Q,
~ I III j
I 1II
J i , , j j
j j j
j j jl j j j j ~ ! m !
......
QI
0
.&:
01
e
...... ...... QI
S >> -0
.... C ....
...... 01 01 /II
S Q. bO ...... 01 .....
.... 0 QI ...... QI . ......
01 W .&: QI ...... '0 /II ..... .... a
Q. :s ...... cO ... -0 C & II .....
.&: B S ...... ... C 0 . .... Q. II
01 ... ...... .... ...... -0 .... B II ...... Co
.... w QI II QI <II ... ... w .... Q/ Q. e .c
oJ: < > Q. QI QI 0 QI 01 01 w .... <J C
... <J ..... 0 ...... ...... ... .... bO a- S .. oJ: II ... 0
0 01 ..lIl w ...... .... B 0 ... 'C e 01 .... <J a- 01 ...
W X 01 bO B 01 .... ... C .... :s f-o 01 01 ... .&: bO
.... .....- 0 C .... >> 01 ... QI .... 0 ... <J .... cO .&: ... ...... C
01 II 01 0 Q. QI <II ... II .... ... oJ: U & ....
Q/ I Q/ B a- ... e ... ... " .... Q. w ... ... II .... .&:
III > Q/ .... 'C <II Q/ ..lIl -0 0 0 01 -0 01 /II
.....- .... -0 .... C bO 01 cO QI w C C W "" III .&: .... Q. 01
~ " ftI II 01 Q. ... :>> f-o ... .... f-o .....- >. f-o w ::a
J .....- a: >. ..a ..a ftI ...... ..... c.. ..... ..... III .....- 0 .&: .....
.....- 0 ::l ..a ~ c.. .....- j ~ ... u
J c.: u '" .....- J j j I s .....- t Iloo ... j
j .....- .....- u CIl ~ .....- cO
.....- .....- j i .&:
~ j j I '... j t:.
Q.
J J >. ci.
j J I j Q. ,
J J J I J III
I J i j )( J J J
01
~ C
....
W
oJ:
f-o
.....
...... Ii
QI ...
C 01
.... Q.
Q.
...... ...... >.
..... ..... ..... C ...... .&: 01 W
-0 QI <J ..... w 01 /II C W
0 ...... > .... QI 0 C 01 ...... 01 III
0 III 0 ..... ..... ... ... .&: 01 ... 'C .... oJ:
)0 .... W -0 '0 /II ... ... .... /II 0 <J <J
C ... bO C C ...... 01 w <J 0 C
0 ... C .... .... >. x >. E C III ~ ... 01
W >. 01 ...... ..... w w .... ..... Ii QI .... >. 0 -0
.... X a III Ei II 01 .... .... 0 III 0 a- ....
I .... ... e e .... I )( 01 Q. ~ -0 W
oX III QI W 01 ...... '" 01 -0 II /II ..... .... 0
<J a- ... 01 Q. e ... ... )0 :s )0 01 ...... ...... ... ....
'" cO .... <J .... -0 W 0 ...... 01 <J >. .... cO Iloo
... ... .c .... 01 cO -0 '0 .... C QI .... QI QI .... .... C ~ .....
<Q U ::a .... .... Co ... .... .... w ., .... ...... C ..a 01 .... 01
..... .....- ...... 01 - .... ::a QI ...... QI III .... .... Ei 0 Co .....- I
.... :s 01 ::a ::a .....- ...... .c >- C Co w 01 .... ....
~ .. I .... u .... ..... ....... 01 ... i ..... - 01 ., lQ bO j
i ::l .... 01 J C ::l Q. .c <J ..... .....- C
Cl ~ ::l 1 J 01 0 j III 01
...... .....- <J C CIl ." 01 ~ j I ...
... 01 ..... C .... "'"
j .. -l lQ 01 III 01 .....
i .....- C ..... ~ ell .....- >
J ..... 11
I 11 W 11 ~ ~ ci. I
j Co i r J j Co
Q. GI
III t C ... J
J J 0 j
i j j /II.&: ~ j
~ Cf-o
... j ~I j
J ..lIl
w
01 CII
X
.
EXHIBIT G
(
::---::::"......:::::........................~
.-
'-J:: )j=-~f~~:~~~.=~:.".~.'L::~:~:~:~~~~~:~~:.~;;.;; :~:.:~~::::::,.;;".,,:::;:::~,:,:~~;,:;:::::~=.::::::::'::=::~::5.:. :;.t, ~:.~~~}::':~::::::::::~
_ _. ... _ ._ ._ _ _. ... ._ on __ h. ... n. ... ._. _ ... .- h. "..
~.".._.~_.......\ !.,i-.....-.'''''''''''...''''''''....'\ !../..,~"'...._..""...,.""."".'""--MM52f.--..-"---"._--"-:-"~---'~" ''';:,.,.,..--."._,.......~....,...
! i
.
tAi~
~~
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
South
Florida
Regional
Planning
Councir
Marathon Airport/Terminal Expansion
A
~
Not to
Scale
Source: ADA
, .
COMPOSITE BXHIBIT A
APPIlCATION FOR DBVELOPMHNT APPROVAL
(SECOND SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE)
This documentation has been supplied with Agenda Item J-7 of the
6/29/92 BOCC meeting. (Resolution granting a Development Order
for a Major Conditional Use for the Marathon Airport Terminal).
We have avoided the duplication of this documentation to save
time, money, and most importantly, trees.