Resolution 066-1991Planning Department
RESOLUTION NO. 066-1991
A RESOLUTION OF THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF MONROE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, MONROE
COUNTY AND RONALD GILMAN AND STUART MARR
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2,
SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 61S, RANGE 39E AT
MILE MARKER 101.5, KEY LARGO, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, on September 5, 1990 the Monroe County Planning
Department issued Development Order No. 21-90 to Ronald Gilman
and Stuart Marr for closure and restoration of their quarry locat-
ed in Government Lot 2 of Section 27, Township 61S, Range 39E, at
Mile Marker 101.5, Key Largo, Florida; and
WHEREAS, on November 30, 1990, the Florida Department of
Community Affairs filed a Notice of Appeal with the Florida Land
and Water Adjudicatory Commission, appealing the issuance of
Monroe County Development Order No. 21-90 and alleging that the
development allowed by the order permitted expansion of the quar-
ry by additional and unnecessary excavation and also alleging
that the site is not properly zoned for mining activities; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs and
Mssrs. Gilman and Marr wish to amicably settle now, and for the
future, their rights to complete the approved reclamation, resto
ration, revegetation and closure of the quarry site; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the
owners of the quarry desire to add the following conditions and
modifications to Monroe County Development Order No. 21-90:
1. Development activities on this site shall be only for the
purposes of reclamation, restoration and closure of the quarry;
GILMAN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
2. Further "mining" activity on this site, as described in Sec-
tion 9.5-432 and 9.5-433, Monroe County Land Development Regula-
tions, shall cease; but limited resource extraction incident to
the reclamation work shall not be deemed mining;
3. The activities at this quarry are deemed reclamation activi-
ties rather than "mining", and thus, the owners are not required
to obtain a zoning change to carry out the reclamation plan and
closure of the quarry;
4. The owners shall configure shoreline slopes so that surface
water generated by rainfall shall support the revegetated areas
of the site, as shown in the vegetation plan;
5. The owners shall plant vegetation pursuant to the modified
revegetation plan drawn by Dale Baldwin;
6. The owners shall expand the area which is to be planted with
mangroves to ten (10) feet in width and shall plant an area of
green buttonwoods between the mangroves and the hardwood hammock
species;
7. All sloping, resource extraction, contour shaping and other
earth moving activities shall be in accordance with state and
local regulations for quarry reclamation;
8. The existing pit shall not be excavated any deeper than it is
now;
9. The reclamation and restoration operations shall be fenced so
as to prevent unauthorized entry;
10. The owners shall post a guarantee of performance in favor of
and approved by Monroe County in the amount of $50,000 (fifty
thousand dollars) to secure performance of the reclamation and
restoration requirements of Development Order #21-90;
11. Upon completion of the reclamation project, the owners shall
submit a completion report to Monore County; and
Resolution #
GILMAN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the staff report by Robert Herman, Director of
Growth Management, and Lorenzo Aghemo, Director of Planning,
found that the agreement between the Florida Department of Commu-
nity Affairs and Ronald Gilman and Stuart Marr complies with the
Monroe County Land Development Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Growth Management, the Director of
Planning and the planning staff consider the agreement to be in
the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, therefore, the staff report by Robert Herman, Direc-
tor of Growth Management, and Lorenzo Aghemo, Director of Plan-
ning, recommends approval of the agreement and recommends that
the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Mayor to execute
the agreement between the Florida Department of Community Affairs
and Ronald Gilman and Stuart Marr;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMIS
SIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
That the Board of Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida,
agrees with the recommendation of the Director of Growth
Manangement, the Director of Planning and the planning staff that
the execution of this agreement would be in the best interests of
the citizens of Monroe County and we hereby approve and adopt the
agreement between the Florida Department of Community Affairs and
Ronald Gilman and Stuart Marr; and
That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the agree-
ment between the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Monroe
County, Ronald Gilman and Stuart Marr, a copy of said agreement
is attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and
That the Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to forward
three executed copies of the agreement to the Department of
Community Affairs.
Resolution #
GILMAN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the /�? day of r- A.D. , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Mayor/Chairman
e
(SEAL)
Attest:D
' , XMEAGE, CIerk
APPROVED AS 70 FORM
Resolution #
-
STATE OF FLORIDA _
LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISS011 ,
� s' �1
IN RE: MINOR CONDITIONAL USES
DEVELOPMENT ORDER #21-90 ISSUED ``'-'r
BY MONROE COUNTY TO GILLMAN &' CASE NO. 90-01i's
MARR IN THE FLORIDA KEYS AREA
OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into by Ronald C. Gillman and Stuart
D. Marr (OWNERS) and the State of Florida, Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes
(1989).
BACKGROUND
This Agreement is based on the following statements of law and
fact:
WHEREAS, Ronald C. Gillman and Stuart D. Marr are the owners
of property located in Key Largo, Monroe County, Florida, which was
and has been for many years used for quarrying. Active quarrying
operations at the site have reached the limit of the permitted
mining activities and accordingly mining has ceased. The site
currently consists of a vertical shear -wall water -filled pit and
its surrounding scarified area, and access to the site by an
unpaved connecting way to U.S. Highway 1. The OWNERS have stated
that further activities at the site are for purposes of closure,
reclamation and restoration of the site; and,
WHEREAS, A Minor Conditional Uses Development Order (#21-90)
was issued by Monroe County to the OWNERS on September 5, 1990, to
permit reclamation and closure of the site, in accordance with
certain conditions and attached plans and drawings submitted by the
DOCKET AND T HF.ARING
OFFICER; IT.F
IN CASE F REVIEW
H.O. INITIALS
applicant showing excavation and slope formation cross -sections,
specifications and details, a revegetation plan, and a list of
plant species and replanting conditions. The Development Order also
listed certain conditions and requirements of existing state and
local permits and regulations cited therein; and,
WHEREAS, The DCA is the state land planning agency with the
duty and responsibility to administer and enforce Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes, including the provisions of Sections 380.05 and
380.0552 applicable to the Florida Keys Area of Critical State
Concern; and,
WHEREAS, On November 30, 1990, DCA filed a Notice of Appeal
with the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLWAC)
from Monroe County Minor Conditional Uses Development Order #21-90
relating to the subject Key Largo quarry site, alleging that the
development allowed by the order permitted expansion of the quarry
by additional and unnecessary excavation and resource extraction
prior to closure of the quarry, that the previously permitted
amount of material extraction had been reached or exceeded, and
that the permitted activity violated certain provisions of the
MCLDR: the site is not properly zoned for mining activities,
therefor it is a "nonconforming use", and the excavation and
restoration allowed by the development order does not meet specific
criteria of Sections 9.5-432(b), (f), (g) and 9.5-433, of the
MCLDR. This appeal was assigned FLWAC case number 90-048; and,
WHEREAS Gillman and Marr have asserted their rights to
continue excavation and resource extraction activities pursuant to
K
the development order and other permits they have obtained. Further
they assert that they are in compliance with every permit
condition, regulation and ordinance that applies to their property
and the activities being conducted there; and,
WHEREAS, The parties desire to amicably settle and resolve the
foregoing dispute by agreement in order to avoid the expense and
uncertainty of litigation and to settle now and for the future the
OWNER's rights to complete the approved reclamation, restoration,
revegetation and closure of the quarry site, pursuant to the
permits and development order as amended herein. The parties
therefore desire to add certain conditions and modifications to the
foregoing Minor Conditional Uses Development Order issued by Monroe
County, Florida, and to dismiss the administrative appeal
referenced above.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. RECITALS: The foregoing background recitals are true and
correct and the parties request the FLWAC to add the following
conditions and modifications to Minor Conditional Uses Development
Order #21-90 relating to Gillman and Marr's Key Largo quarry site,
as specified below.
2. PERMIT MODIFICATIONS: The following conditions and
modifications are added to Monroe County Minor Conditional Uses
Development Order #21-90 as they relate to Gillman and Marr's Key
Largo quarry site located at approximately MM101.5 on the Overseas
r
Highway (U.S. Highway 1), as more particularly described on the
subject development order #21-90, attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
Permitted Conditional Use
A. Development activity at this site shall consist of earth
moving, dredging, sloping, resource extraction, grading, planting,
and other activities consistent with construction, emplacement and
revegetation of slopes, grades, contour formation, and related site
reclamation work in accordance with the plans and drawings attached
to and made a part of the subject Conditional Uses Development
Order, and likewise made a part of this agreement. All further
resource extraction shall be to the minimum extent necessary, and
only incident to accomplishing the specified slopes, grades,
revegetation, and restoratibn as set out in the referenced
drawings, plans, specifications, and applicable rules and permits
described in the subject development order.
B. Further "mining" activity at this site, as more
particularly described in the MCLDR and pertinent state
regulations, shall not be conducted at this site; but limited
further resource extraction incident to the permitted reclamation
work shall not be deemed to be "mining" so long as the amount of
material removed is in accordance with, and not more than, the
physical reclamation plan requirements and permit conditions as
described in the development order and its attached drawings and
specifications. All slopes, setbacks, distances, depths, specified
materials and plants, and final measurements shall conform to those
0
depicted in the drawings listed on and incorporated by reference
into the development order, including the revegetation plan and the
plant species and planting conditions listed thereon.
C. The activities at this site are deemed reclamation
activities rather than "mining", and these activities shall be
conducted solely for the limited purposes and for the limited time
period described. The OWNERS are not required to obtain a zoning
change to carry out the reclamation plan and closure of the quarry
site, even though the site is not currently zoned for industrial
use as would otherwise be required for mining activities under the
MCLDR.
Sloping and Drainage Requirements
D. In addition to the specifications and the requirements as
generally depicted or modified on the plans and drawings herein,
the OWNERS shall configure such shoreline slopes so that surface
water generated by rainfall, to the maximum extent practicable,
shall be directed so as to provide maximum water use in support of
the natural or planted vegetation placed on or in support of such
slopes, similar to Rule 16C-36.008(7)(a) F.A.C., and in support of
the vegetation plan incorporated into the development order, and
incorporated by reference into this agreement.
Vegetation
E. The OWNERS shall plant vegetation in the shoreline slope
areas and the disturbed area between the slope and the existing
natural hammock, pursuant to the revegetation plan (Baldwin drawing
dated 8/8/90) attached to the development order, as modified herein
5
and made a part hereof by reference. This plan includes a list of
species to be planted, and requirements for an 80% survival rate,
and control of invasive exotics to continue for two years after
planting.
The OWNERS agree to insure that the appropriate mangrove
species are planted in a manner that fosters their establishment
and survival in the flat shelf area, as depicted on drawing 3 of 3,
Sections A -A and B-B, and additionally shall expand the horizontal
dimension of the mangrove planting area from five (5) feet as shown
to ten (10) feet pursuant to this agreement. The expansion shall be
in the landward/upland direction (away from the existing pit) from
the five ( 5 ) foot flat area shown/ located in the attached drawings,
such that the flat shall be ten (10) feet in width in final form,
and the same mangrove planting density shall be maintained. This
will require approximately double the number of mangrove seedlings
as originally specified, but will result in a reduction of the
number of hardwood seedlings required in the first five ( 5 ) feet on
the upland/hammock slope.
The OWNERS further agree to plant Green Buttonwood to be
located upland of the mangrove -plantings, and waterward of the
hardwoods on ten (10) foot centers, -such that the reclaimed site,
described generally from the interior to the exterior, shall be
open water over correctly sloped excavation, then a planted ten
(10) foot wide belt of Mangroves on a flat shoreline area at the
nominal water surface elevation of the site, then a belt of Green
Buttonwood planted on ten (10) foot centers upland of the
H.
Mangroves, gradually then merging into plantings of the listed
hardwoods reaching to the existing natural hammock, as generally
shown on the drawings attached hereto and amended in accordance
with this agreement.
An appropriate annotation shall be made on the drawings that
will reflect these additional changes and conditions of development
and reference this agreement.
The OWNERS shall do the reclamation and restoration work in
sections around the existing pit, such that as each section is
dredged and sloped, the revegetation and planting will be
accomplished prior to disturbance of the next section; however
control of invasive exotic species will be done continuously
throughout the entire site as appropriate and as otherwise
specified in the reclamation plan.
Sloping and Earth Moving
F. All sloping, resource extraction, contour shaping, and
other earth moving activities shall be generally in accordance with
state and local rules and regulations for quarry reclamation, and
specifically in accordance with the distances, depths, measurements
and other technical specifications as shown on the drawings, maps
and plans attached to the development order and made a part hereof
by reference. The existing pit shall not be excavated any deeper
than as it currently exists, and all resource extraction shall be
to the minimum extent necessary to accomplish the reclamation and
restoration of the site as shown in the referenced plans and
drawings.
VA
Equipment and Structure Removal
G. All equipment, machinery and structures, except for
structures which are usable for safety, recreation, or other
authorized use in the area, shall be removed within 180 days after
the restoration, as set forth in this development order and
agreement, is completed by the OWNERS.
The reclamation and restoration operations of the OWNERS shall
be reasonably fenced or blocked so as to prevent unauthorized entry
into the work area through the access road or from adjacent
properties.
4.8ursty Band or Guarantee
H. The OWNERS shall post a surety bond or other guarantee of
performance in favor of and approved by Monroe County, Florida in
the amount of $50,000 (Fifty Thousand Dollars) to secure
performance by the OWNERS of the reclamation and restoration
requirements of the subject development order, as amended by this
agreement. A copy of the surety shall be furnished to DCA.
When the project is completed, the OWNERS shall submit a
completion report to Monroe County. A copy of the completion
report, together with a final written inspection to review
compliance with all development order conditions herein, shall be
provided by Monroe County to DCA for review within 15 days of
submittal of the report. DCA retains authority pursuant to this
agreement to review the final compliance determination within 30
days of receipt of the final inspection report, before Monroe
8
County is authorized to release the bond or surety.
Minor conditional use
I. Any change or renewal of the subject Minor Conditional Use
Development Order shall be reviewed under the conditional use
requirements in the MCLDR, provided that compliance with this
Agreement shall be a presumption of compliance with those
requirements.
zoninc
J. The development authorized pursuant to the subject
development order is deemed reclamation and restoration. It is not
"mining" as that term is defined in state and local regulations.
"Mining" activity at this site has been terminated. Any future
resource extraction shall be to the limited amount necessary to
accomplish the restoration, reclamation, and closure of this site
pursuant to the development order and this agreement. Therefore,
the OWNERS are not required to seek Industrial zoning for this
site, and the current zoning is deemed appropriate at this site
solely for the restoration and reclamation intended under this
development order.
Authority
K. This agreement is made by DCA pursuant to its legal
authority under Section 380.032(3), Florida Statutes (1989), and is
enforceable pursuant to Section 380.11, Florida Statutes (1989).
Successors and Assigns
L. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding
on the successors and assigns of the parties.
9
0
E
Effective Date
M. The effective date of this agreement is that date when the
last party hereto signs a counterpart of this agreement.
3. Recommendation to FLWAC:
The parties hereto recommend approval of this agreement and
issuance of a development order by FLWAC incorporating the
conditions set forth above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
agreement and agreed to be bound by its terms.
OWNERS:
••
i
Reviewed for legal form
and sufficiency:
By:J%&�f
Attorney, DCA William E. Sadowski, Secretary
Department of Community Affairs
State of F16rida
I
APNEA AS TO FORM MONROE COUNTY:
AND LIFC3Al. SUMCJENCY.
Aff0M
Dim
WILHELMINA HARVEY, Mayor
(SEAL)
10. ATTEST,;ANNY L KO RAGE, CLERK
By :-4a-
,
Depu Clerk
3 -11-10 '�F/
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Subscribed and sworn to before me by Ronald C. Gillman
as Owner/Operator this 'Z.Ll:?� day of 1991.
otary Pu c
My commisgion expires: NOT.ARY PLOLiC aQp•%t t ' F. t`'-'7:;,1
PAY COMISS1GN E%''F'.
STATE OF �L o4l bA 5WrD THM GE'.0
COUNTY OF
Subscribed and sworn to before me by Stuart D. Marr
as Owner/Operator this Z day of 1991.
ACI�A,
Notary Public
My commission exlZets
Notary r 17-1C,
STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Leon bonded Thru Troy Fain • insurncn
Subscribed and sworn to before me by William E. Sadowski
as Secretary. DCA this J day of
. No ry Public .moiety PAU, s! � 4,�1944
My ommission ex%t ploaE�
t ar Fw' rro a Yw
STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Monroe
Subscribed and sworn to before me by Wrriccll1helmina Harvey
as Mayor, Monroe County this d of �u , 1991.
N tary PublY
My commission expires:
pOIWY Pubp" Sfnfg 4 r1orile
My
11 fondrd Thru Tray u. c.
659163L114i 2350
0
0
o
=
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
77
-
_7
00
MINOR CONDITIONAL USES
_.
-
.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
#21-90
I-
'�'
•
N
WHEREAS, the Development Review Committee of Monroe County,
Florida, on July 11, 1990,in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 9.5-24 and 9.5-68, of the Monroe County Land Develop-
ment Regulations, met to review the request of Ronald Gillman
for a Minor Conditional Use Approval, on the following described
property:
RE# 008710-0000300 located on government lot 2, Key Larger___
Monroe County, Florida, section 27, township 6151 range 39E,_..__
approximately MM 101.5.--
WHEREAS the following Minor Conditional Use is proposed:
Closure and restoration of an existing quarry.
WHEREAS the proposed minor conditional use is shown on the
following plans:
1 A three (3) sheet series of plans received by Monroe County
(Ty) on 3-30-90 consisting of: sheet 1; An existing conditions
plan bV bV Task Surveyors, Inc dated 7-18-89, revised 7-10-89
to add lake area, revised 8-30-89 to add edge of vegetation,
sealed by Joseph steinocher on 8-5-89 sheet 2; a proposed resto-
ration and closing of_existing cuarrV with a keystone min -
in x-sect.• sheet 3• cross sections of work on sheet.2.
• r'
f�� MD
0 CT ? C; intro
LAND ,
8Y
659163 RECI147 �1
2 A revegetation of existing quarry plan by Dale Baldwin,
Land-scape Architect dated August 8, 1989.
WHEREAS THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, has duly considered the recom-
mendations of the Development Review Committee, the complete
file and the following information and documentary evidence sum-
marized as including:
1 Building permit # C9249 dated March 20, 1981 to excavate a
lake for a total of 358,000 c.y. x 45_' depth.
2 An unsigned letter dated February 22, 1990, by George
Garrett, Environmental Resource Director, denying the annual re-
newal of a dredge permit.
3 A letter to George Garrett from Mr. Robert S. Carr, Archeo-
logical and Historical Conservancy Inc President, dated October
10, 1989, requesting protection of a nearby historical site.
4 The application dated June 25, 1990, for an expansion of the
existing rock quarry.
5 Staff report by Robert Smith, Senior Biologist to Leonard
Symroski, Development Review Coordinator dated 7-10-90 (DRC)._
6. The plans received at the Development Review Committee on
7-11-90.
7. The site plan drawn by J. Steinocher, P.E.
8 A survey by Task Surveyors, Inc dated 7-18-89, revised 8-
30-89 to add edge of vegetation, sealed by Joseph Steinocher on
8-5-89.
9. A three (3) sheet series of glans received by Monroe Count
(Ty) on 3-30-90 consisting of: sheet 1; An existing conditions
plan by by Task Surveyors Inc dated 7-18-89, revised 7-10-89
to add lake area, revised 8-30-89 to add edge of vegetation,_
sealed by Joseph Steinocher on 8-5-89 sheet 2; a proposed resto-
ration and closing of existing quarry with a keystone miningx-
sect.;sheet 3; corss sections of work on sheet 2.
10 A revegetation of existing quarry plan by Dale Baldwin dat-
ed August 8, 1989.
659163 1 47 ^ 2
11 Minutes of the Board of County Commission meeting at Key
Colony Beach, May 29, 1990, directing staff to approach the ex-
pansion of a borrow pit hat has completed its permit as a minor
conditional use.
AND WHEREAS THE PLANNING DIRECTOR makes the following find-
ings of fact
1 That the application has been modified to be a restoration
and closure plan as is required of new resource extraction activ-
ities pursuant to section 9.5-division 15 of the Monroe County
Code.
2 That the environment will have a positive impact based off
of the expansion of the existing borrow pit by increasing the
surface area to volume ratio of the water.
3. That the environment will have a positive impact based off
of the regrading of the shores and slopes which will be planted
with mangroves.
4 That the environment will have a positive impact based off
the incorporation of native upland vegetation in an area that
presently is in a scarified state.
5 That a positive effect will be derived by the public in re-
gards to safety by the elimination of a dangerous shear walled
borrow pit.
6 The project is consistent with the Land Development Regula-
tions based upon the Monroe County Land Use Plan and Regulations.
7 Conditions are necessary to minimize adverse impacts on adja-
cent properties based upon staff review._
B. Conditions are necessary to assure adequate protection of
water quality from borrow pits based on the policies of the com-
prehensive plan.
9. There is an historic site in the southeast corner of the
site based off of the staffs knowledge of known archeological
findings.
�9153 L'114i `�'?" 3
THEREFORE THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, has concluded that said
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE on said plans be granted approval with the
following conditions:
1. The restoration of the lake be accomplished within bear of
the start of the new excavation.
2. The restoration of the scarified areas should be as deline-
ated in the plan submitted by Dale Baldwin dated 8-8-90.
3 All plants used in the restoration shall be of either endan-
gered, threatened or protected species.
4 The area of the historic district shall be fenced prior to
construction to restrict in advertent disturbance by heavy
equipment
S. All mangroves planted shall be no less than 2 feet tall at
the time of planting.
6. All planted material shall have a guaranteed survival rate
of 80 % for 1 year. This condition shall be monitored by the
County Biologist on a guaterly basis.
7. The slope of the lake shall be as submitted in the plans _
drawn by J.Steinocher dated 7-23-90.
UNDER THE AUTHORITY of Section 9.5-72(a) of the Monroe Coun-
ty Land Development Regulations, this conditional use approval
shall become null and void, with no further action required by
the County, after six months of this approval if a building per-
mit is not applied for or after two years of the issuance of the
initial building permit unless all required certificates of occu-
pancy necessitated by this conditional use approval have been
obtained.
659 ! 63 iL�1 1 7 a
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Director of
Monroe County, Florida, that the minor conditional use permit
for the development described above is hereby granted according
to the terms and conditions set forth therein.
Date : SerSk 6W
Lorenzo Alhemd • j
Director of Planning
Notary Public. State of Florida At Large
PAy Commission Expires Mar 4, 1991
30naed ey Western Suretv company
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF MONROE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer
duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County afore-
said, to take acknowledgments, personally appeared LORENZO
AGHEMO, to me known to be the person described in and who execut-
ed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that
he executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State
last aforesaid this sp, day of
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA'-.'
��UL3r�l Pt,tbl+t:. _tAtf# c/t fldr�rie rr
+.ty omm+vSW� Expires M:3r A T�r :
.'On0?1 tiM �OsY efn/xith Jr,:pe ;�
Section 9.5-72.(a) of Monroe County Code states that -a-condition-
al use permit shall not be transferred to a successive owner
without notification to the Development Review Coordinator, with-
in five (5) days of the transfer.
I, the undersigned, do hereby attest that I have read and agree
to the conditions listed above.
659163 rEFCF1 14 - '_12355
Date
_.�.� _ ,/:mil ,
Property Owner
j
Notary Public
NOTAiZV PUai:C LT;1 I tt i �: ?t. 11VDA "
REFERENCE: Ir. the event that this development order constitutes
an amendment, extension, variation, or alteration of a previous
conditional use permit, that document may be referenced by the
following NONE
Please be advised that this Development Order is subject to a
forty five (45) day appeal period by the State of Florida Depart-
ment of Community Affairs. The 45 day appeal period begins upon
receipt of this development order by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs.
This instrument prepared by:
Lori Hoover
Monroe County Planning Department
in
eri
zecord lAviiim:
DANh"t 1. TOLHA(Z
Clark CL cuft Cad
oul Sloolitpiv OCILIOSPUB-1 kuu ino !DNIISIX3 dO Nor 1303A3u a3SOdOud,
S31vioossv v Nimmys u 3iva NVW'11!D (3'IVNOU 'HW
A.a-30
\ \ \ \ \
\ } } } \ j } } } \ \ } \ } \ \ }
2 ^\/ /\\\� \ �w 2 = '
>y � � �� � °
\\ � ��}� \
LU
LU
\\ ~
/ . . . .a.....................