Loading...
Resolution 557-1989 Growth Management RESOLUTION NO. 557-1989 0-, ~q Lr\ '::L , t...,.. ;..;, :N c L A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MO~ROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZ~NGTHE MAYOR/ CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO THE EXISTING AGREE- MENT BY AND BETWEEN BRW, INC. AND MONROE COUNTY CONCERNING THE COMPLETION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN :J\ N 0... i...W ~..0 WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et seq. of the Florida Statutes requires the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan for Monroe County in order to provide for the orderly growth, preservation of the environment and wise management of public facilities and natural resources. WHEREAS, the Florida Administrative Code, Rule 9J-5 promulgated by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) would require the preparation of the County's Comprehensive Plan and establishes the standards for each element of the plan. WHEREAS, BRW, Inc., is a consultant already under contract with Monroe County for other planning services and is qualified to complete the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners, at i t.S meeting on June 27, 1989, passed Resolution No. 378-1989, authorizing the Chairman of the Board to execute a certain agreement between Monroe County and BRW, Inc. inVOlving the preparation of a focal point plan for Lower Matecumbe Key; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COTJNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Mayor/Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute an addendum to the existing agreement by and between BRW, Inc. and Monroe County concerning t the completion of the County's Comprehensive Plan, a copy of same being attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the ~.f1J day of S -..i:J1vu,); e r- A.D. 1989. , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~ GE rrr'-k ATTEST:DANNY ~ ~QI;e:.t\ '" I ~~~_ ------- --..._-~"'-- _.. -. OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY~ ~;4-1f),~ Clerk By ..,--;(~ '~ d~~~ Mayor/Chairman (Seal) BY :O"~~~lil~'" 'L..JLJ " PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING URBAN DESIGN SRW, INC. 200 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 206, JANNUS LANDING ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 PHONE: 813/895-1692 .lD September 1989 (' RECEIVED Mr. Donald Craig Assistant County Administrator Monroe County Planning 5825 Junior College Road Key West. Florida 33040 <" 1- D '1 t:l 1989 ""'L i' <:: 0 "IJ.';\JNING DEPT. BY U\ND IJSE DIV~ Dear Don: This letter is to serve as an amended addendum to the Lower Matecumbe Key Agreement between Monroe County and BRW. Inc.. for the Revision of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan. Monroe County (hereinafter called the "COUNTY") must revise its comprehensive pla~ in timely compliance with state laws and rules. including but not limited to Chapter 9J-5 "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance". Florida Administrative Code. Chapter 9J-ll "Procedural Rule for Review of Local Government Compre- hensive Plans and Plan Amendments". Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-l2 "Schedule for Submission of Revised Local Government Comprehensive Plans", Florida Administrative Code. and Part II of Chapter 163 "Cbunty and Municipal Planning and Land Development Regulation", Florida Statues and obtain from the Florida Department of Community Affairs. (hereinafter referred to as the "STATE"). a Notice of Intent finding the plan in compli- ance with state laws and rules. The COUNTY has determined that it is necessary, expedient and to the best interest of the COUNTY to retain, obtain or employ BRW, Inc (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant") to render and perform consulting and other professional services in connection with the revision of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan. ARTICLE 1. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT The CONSULTANT warrants to the COUNTY that the CONSULTANT is professionally competent to perform and render the services to be performed and rendered by the CONSULTANT pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT. In reliance by the COUNTY upon said warrant, the CONSULTANT shall perform and render the professional planning services in the form of a work assignment described in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and made a part of this AGREEMENT. AN AFFILIATE OF THE BENNETT. RING ROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC , GROUP DAVID J BENNETT DONALD W RINGROSE RICHARD P WOLSFELD PETER E JARVIS LAWRENCE J. GARDNER THOMAS F CARROLL CRAIG A. AMUNDSEN DONALD E. HUNT MARK G SWENSON JOHN B. McNAMARA RICHARD D PILGRIM DALE N. BECKMANN DENNIS J SUTLIFF JEFFREY L BENSON RALPH C BLUM DAVID L GRAHAM ST. PETERSBURG PHOENIX TUCSON DENVER MINNEAPOLIS Mr. Donald Craig M~nroe County Planning 26 September 1989 Page 2 '" ARTICLE 2. TIME OF COMPLETION The services to be rendered by the CONSULTANT shall be commenced upon written notice from the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT shall make every effort to complete the services defined in Article 1 above, in accordance with EXHIBIT "A", provided that the COUNTY meets all obligations to the CONSULTANT described in this AGREEMENT, including, but not limited to, the timely review of work products, preparation of the public participation element, the scheduling and timely completion of required workshops and hearing, receipt and review of public comment within the proposed time frames. Where the COUNTY has not met any obligation to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall provide notice to the COUNTY within 10 days indicating the nature of the obligation not fulfilled. The CONSULTANT shall be entitled to additional time, if it so requests, should the COUNTY cause delays. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION A. Certain work will be financed through the STATE's Local Government Comprehensive Planning Assistance Program. The CONSULTANT will submit all work products for this Local Government Planning Assistance Grant, and submit an invoice for such work to Monroe County B. Actual monthly compensation will be based on the schedule of fees con- tained in EXHIBIT "B" of the Lower Matecumbe Key Community Plan Contract. Total compensation to the CONSULTANT for work conducted under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed $305,000. C. If, through the COUNTY quality review, any work task is found to be incomplete or inaccurate, the CONSULTANT will be notified of said deficien- cies within 10 days of receipt and compensation for that portion of the work may be withheld until the CONSULTANT corrects the deficiency. D. Any additional work authorized by the COUNTY shall be reimbursed on a direct expense and hourly basis in accordance with the rates provided in EXHIBIT "B" of the Lower Matecumbe Key Community Plan Contract. ARTICLE 4. DURATION AND TERMINATION This AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect until all Tasks are completed but not later than December 31, 1990. ARTICLE 5. COVENANTS BY THE COUNTY The COUNTY hereby covenants and agrees: A. That the Assistant County Administrator for Growth Management of. Monroe County is hereby appointed as a single Authorized Representative of the COUNTY with respect to any particular service to be performed by the CON- SULTANT pursuant to this AGREEMENT. The Authorized Representative shall "~:.:'."i;' Mr. Donald Craig Monroe County Planning 26 September 1989 Page 3 - have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the policy of the COUNTY and decisions pertinent to services covered by this AGREEMENT. The Assistant County Administrator for Growth Management shall have the right from time to time to designate such other employees of the Monroe County Planning Department as said Assistant County Administrator may deem advisable to serve as the Authorized Representative in the absence of said Assistant County Administrator. B. To make available at no cost to the CONSULTANT all existing records, reports, maps, plans, aerial photographs, fiscal data and other existing data which may resonably be required for work under this AGREEMENT. C. To give prompt notice to the CONSULTANT whenever the COUNTY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the day-to-day performance of work under this AGREEMENT. D. To give careful and reasonable consideration to the findings and recom- mendations of the CONSULTANT and to respond in a timely manner so as not to unduly delay the CONSULTANT's work called for by this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 6. INSURANCE The CONSULTANT shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect it from claims under the Worker1s Compensation Act. Further, the CONSULTANT shall secure and maintain, during the period of this AGREEMENT, public liability and property damage insurance which will protect it and the COUNTY from claims for bodily injury, death or property damage which may arise from the performance of its services under this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 7. LEGAL RESTRAINTS AND LIMITATIONS The CONSULTANT acknowledges that the COUNTY, as a unit of local goverment and a subdivision of the State of Florida, is subject to restraints, limita- tions, regulations and controls imposed or administered pursuant to numerous applicable laws, ordinance, rules and regulations of federal, state, regional and certain local jurisdictional governmental agencies or authorities. The CONSULTANT agrees that all professional services rendered or performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall be in compliance therewith. ARTICLE 8. QUALITY OF WORK The service shall be performed by the CONSULTANT to the reasonable satis- faction of the COUNTY and all questions, difficulties and disputes of any nature whatsoever that may arise under or by reason of this AGREEMENT, the prosectuion and fulfillment of the services hereunder and the character, quality, amount of the parties, shall be settled by recourse to litigation under Florida law. . .'~ Mr. Donald Craig Monroe'County Planning '26 September 1989 Page 4 #I ARTICLE 9. NOTICES All notice requests and authorization provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be delivered or mailed addressed as follows: Monroe County Attn: Assistant County Administrator for Growth Management Monroe County Planning 5825 Junior College Road Key West, Florida 33040 To the CONSULTANT: BRW, Inc. Attn: Mr. Fred Goodrow 200 First Avenue, North Suite 206 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 To the COUNTY: or addressed to either party at such other address as such party shall hereinafter furnish to the other party in writing. Each such notice, request or authorization shall be deemed to have been duly given when so delivered, or if mailed, when deposited in the mails, registered, postage paid. ARTICLE 10. SUBCONSULTANTS It is expected that the CONSULTANT shall have in-house capability to provide all the services required by the AGREEMENT. When the CONSULTANT finds it necessary to utilize the services of a subconsultant, the CONSULTANT shall first obtain the approval of the COUNTY and then select a subconsultant using a selection procedure acceptable to the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall require each subconsultant to adhere to appropriate provisions of this AGREEMENT. The utilization of any such subconsultant by the CONSULTANT shall not relieve the CONSULTANT from any liability or responsiblitity to the COUNTY pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 11. ACCEPTANCE When the services of the CONSULTANT are complete, the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY in writing. Thereupon, the COUNTY, within thirty (30) days, shall either provide its written acceptance or give the CONSULTANT written notice of any unfinished services or deficiency to be corrected. The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY in writing when all such items have been completed or corrected, and the COUNTY shall give its acceptance or exception in writing within thirty (30) days thereafter; if such written notice of acceptance or exception is not given within such a period of time, the services shall be deemed to have been accepted by the COUNTY. However, acceptance of the work performed by the CONSULTANT shall not be construed to be an acceptance of improper work or defective or deficient work. . ,~,t\'t:.\ Mr~ Donald Craig Monroe County Planning 26 September 1989 Page 5 . ARTICLE 12. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party shall be considered in default in performance of its obli- gations hereunder to the extent that performance of such obligations, or any of them is delayed or prevented by Force Majeure. Force Majeure shall include but not be limited to hostility, revolution, civil commotion, strike, epidemic, accident, fire, flood, wind, earthquake, lack of/or failure of transportation facilities, any law, proclamation, regulation or ordinance 'or other act of government, or any act of God or any cause whether of the same or different nature, existing or future; provided that the cause whether or not enumerated in this article, is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the party seeking relief under this article. Prompt notice should be given to either party, stating the cause and length of the delay. ARTICLE 13. RESTRICTIONS BRW,INC. represents that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, ~/hich would acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required to be performed under this agreement as provided i~ Section 122.311, et seq., Florida Statutes. BRW, INC. further represents that, in the performance of the agreement, no persons having any such interest shall be employed and are so bound. BRW, INC. shall promptly notify the COUNTY in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest for any prospective business asso- ciation, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence BRW's judgement or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that BRW~INC. may undertake and request an opinion of the COUNTY as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the COUNTY, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by BRW, INC. The COUNTY agrees to notify BRW,INC. of its opinion by certified mail within 30 days of receipt of notification by BRW, INC.. If in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest, or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by BRW, INC. the County shall so state in the notification and BRW, INC. shall, at his opinion, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in,conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the COUNTY by BRW, INC. under the terms of this agreement. Further, such conflict provisions shall extend to BRW, INC. and its sub- contractors for a period of two years beyond termination of this agreement. Mr. Donald Craig Monroe County Planning 26 September 1989 Page 6 . ARTICLE 14. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE Each of the parties hereto covenants to the other party hereto that it has lawful authority to enter into this AGREEMENT, that the governing or managing body of each of these p,rties has approved this AGREEMENT and that the governing or managing b?dy of each of the parties has authorized the execution of this AGREEMENT 1n the manner hereinafter set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be duly executed, this.t~+I. day of September, 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MONROE COUNTY FLORIDA ~)#Y~ Mayor (SEAL ) Attest: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK BY:4ty~.~~~ Bl' Attornf'V'$ O/ficr. . .::t.,'" . ';\~'/>.~';'. . WORK PROGRAM EXHIBIT A 1) Consultant's Responsibilities, It shall be the responsibility of the consultant · a) To carry out, on behalf of Monroe County, all transmittals of intermediate deliverables, of draft documents, and of final products to persons specified by Monroe County, but not to exceed the number of persons/copies identified in section 2) below. All requirements of 9J-11, F.A.C. regarding numbe~ of copies to be transmitted for review of the comprehensive plan and other documents, and regarding the nature of such transmittals, shall also be met by the consultant. However, where 9J-11, F.A.C. requirements and/or requests by Monroe County would result in the reproduction and/or transmittal of more than the maximum number of copies identified, Monore County will process an amendment to this contract/Scope of Services, or otherwise provide for the payment of additional reproduction and/or mailing/transmittal costs not included in this Scope of Services. Transmittals shall be by methods also specified in 2) below. b) To accomplish the completion of tasks identified in the section on "Tasks Descriptions" below in substantial conformance with the schedule shown in the section entitled "Project Schedule" below. Deviation from the "Task Descriptions" and "Project Schedule" may be accomplished subject to agreement by the Assis- tant County Administrator for Planning for Monroe County (or the BOCC, if required) and by the consultant. 2) Consultant's Transmittals a) Number of Copies: i) Unless otherwise indicated in the section on Task Descriptions, the consultant shall provide 20 copies of materials developed for presentation at each Citizen workshop. ii) Unless otherwise indicated, the consultant shall provide 20 copies of materials devel- oped for presentation at each BOCC workshop. iii) Unless otherwise indicated, to provide Monroe County staff with 8 copies of all memorandum, draft elements and other deliverables to facilitate staff review. These copies are included in the totals listed in i) and ii) above. iv) To provide the DCA, at time of submittal of the draft TSD for unofficial review (see Task Description for Task 6.2.) a total of two copies. v) To provide the DCA, at time of transmittal of the proposed comprehe~ive plan, the Technical Support Document, or at time of transmittal of the adopted comprehensive plan with the requuired number of copies pursuant to 9J-ll, F.A.C. b) Format for Transmittals All documents representing draft materials, or intermediate deliverables, and including draft plan elements or memoranda representing conclusions which require staff or other review, shall be transmitted in the following format unless otherwise agreed upon by the consultant and Monroe County staff. for documents less than 25 pages - loose leaf format, stapled as necessary - for documents of between 25 and 150 pages, spiral bound, with or without card stock covers as necessary - for documents exceeding 150 pages and for documents representing complete drafts or final copies of the TSD, complete plan document, 3-ring binders with appropriate cover "slipins", as necessary. c) Method of Transmittal Intermediate, draft or final work products shall be transmitted, as determined to be necessary by the consultant, after consul- tation with Monroe County staff, generally as follows: - for documents subject to review prior to workshop or hearings, by first class mail. - for documents subject for review at workshops or hearings, by hand at the workshop or hearing - for documents transmitted to the DCA and to other local governments, by certified mail, return receipt requested. 3) Monroe County Staff Responsibilities It shall be the responsibility of Monroe County staff to: a) Carry out all tasks asssigned to staff in a timely manner to facilitate the completion of this Scope of Services on schedule. b) Provide for acce'ss by the consultant to all other Monroe County department personnel, as requested by the consultant, for the purposes of obtaining information, discussing items involving that department, and facilitating the review of consultant's products by that department, within a timeframe conductive to the timely completion of each task identified in this Scope of Services.' . , c) Provide, to the consultant, in a timely manner and as necessary, mailing addresses, cover materials, meeting/workshop and/or public hearing agenda, and other items which may be necessary to facilitate and/or serve as attachments to scheduled transmittals of materials to the DCA, and to other persons as deemed necessary, in order to provide for the authorized transmittal of materials to all parties described above. TASK 1 - PHASE 1 DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT , , Three subtasks will be accomplished under Task 1. These ale listed below, and are described in sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 following. 1.1. Preliminary Data Collection 1.2. Development of Land Use - Related Multipliers , 1.3. Generalized Future Land Use and Associated Population projections. 1.1. Preliminary Data Collection 1.1.1. Objectives a) To collect data items required for completion of other sub- tasks in Task 1 1.1.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) Utilize population projections obtained from BEBRs for Monroe County, and adjust these using (where available) population projections for incorporated areas of Monroe County, to arrive at residential and seasonal population projections for years 2000 and 2010 for unincorporated Monroe County. If projections for incorporated areas are not available then the consultant shall generate such data, with consultation with Monroe County staff and with DCA's concurrence on methodology utilized, pursuant to 9J-5.005 (2) (e), F.A.C. b) Obtain other data as required to complete Task 1 from the State Data Center, or other sources. Such items may include projections of persons-per-household multipliers, and other data items. c) Obtain and evaluate data from any Transportation Studies utilized for base year (1980) validation of the transportation modeling effort. Such data may be substituted for, or be utilized to assist in the verification of, extimates of unin- corporated Monroe County's population and/or be utilized to generate additional data required. Also, collect and evaluate data on existing conditions of the street/highway including transportation systems data regarding airport facil- ities. This also includes review of existing documents, and goals/objeGtives/policies regarding transportation systems and their plans. Monroe County Staff assistance directed toward obtaining this data will be required. d) To identify, with Monroe County staff assistance, for all services provided by Monroe County, the unit (or, if necessary, alternative units) of meas~rement by which service level ade- quacy is likely to be measured, and obtain preliminary estimates of recommended Levels of Service for each p~blic service or system. Identification of the measurement criteria with which Leyel of Service may be quantified or decided is preferred at time of this subtask so that population and future development projections, to be developed under section 1.3 below, can be accomplished in a manner consistent or compatible with these measurement criteria, which will permit the direct use of projections generated under section 1.3 during Level of Service analysis in subsequent tasks in this Scope of Services. 1.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To provide the consultant with access to Building Permit data and Certificate of Occupancy data for years 1980-1987, subject to availability. b) To assist the consultant by expediting responses from county agencies/departments. c) To review data items generated, and to be available for con- sultation when alternative data collection methodologies are being considered. 1.1. 4. Products a) Data, for publication in the revised comprehensive plan's technical support documents, and for use in completing Task 1 and subsequent tasks. 1.2 Development of Land-Use Related Multipliers 1.2.1. Objectives a) To develop and quantify land use interrelationships which will characterize future development in Monroe County, for the purpose of assisting in generating projections of future development by land use type. 1.2.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) Develop multipliers/indices which may be utilized to estimate future land uses supportable by growth for years 2000 and 2010 in Monroe County. These may include "retail sales/square foot of gross floor area", "percentage by dwelling unit type for projected housing demand", "employees per hotel room", and other indices/multipliers which will be utilized to assist in projecting future land uses for Monroe County. 1.2.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) Review and provide comment on multipliers/indices developed for purposes of this subtask 1. 2.4. Products . a) Quantified uland use-related" multiplers, and other numerical constants to be utilized to assist the development of future land use projections for Monroe County. b) Documentation of mathematical expressions/formulae which utilize the multipliers to generate projections of future development. 1.3 Generalized Projections 1.3.1. Objectives a) To project the amount of future development for unincorpor- ated Monroe County by land use type, for years 2000 and 2010. b) To project the total population associated with the projected development by land use types for unincorporated Monroe County for years 2000 and 2010. c) To project the amount of future development and population by utilizing land use, population and employment group categories suitable for ( and compatible, with) transportation modeling, suitable for projecting future public facility needs, and suitable for manipulation in order to engage in the mapping of projected land uses by well-defined future land use categories consistent with rule 9J-5.006, F.A.C. 1.3.2. Consultant's Responsiblities a) To utilize the results of the existing land use survey for unincor- porated Monroe County, population projections for unincorporated Monroe County, results and conclusions generated in subsection 1.2 above, inventories of approved development, and other data to generate projections of future land uses for years 2000 and 2010 by land use type. These development projections shall be represented in terms of square footages, dwelling units, acreages under parks and other public facilities, and by other units of measurement as necessary to complete other tasks in this Scope of Services. 1.3.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) Review and comment on results of future development, and population, projections for unincorporated Monroe County. 1. 3. 4. Products a) Projections of future development for years 2000 and 2010 for unincorporated Monroe County by land use type, and at a level of detail sufficient to provide for tranSferability to categories on a Future land use Map developed pursuant to 9J-5.006 (4), F.A.C. (see also b below). b) Population projections associated with each residential land use type referenced in item 1.3.4. a) above, for years 2000 and 2010. ~':':""'.-.. .....'.. TASK 2 - DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE PRELIMINARY lAND USE CONCEPTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR YEAR 2010 , , six subtasks will be accomplished under Task 2. These are tisted below and are described in Sections 2.1 through 2.6 following. 2.1 Graphic representation of Existing Land Use Patterns and Location/Land Uses for Major Approved Developments in Unincorporated Monroe County. 2.2 Graphic Representation of Opportunities/Constraints for Future Develop- ment. 2.3 Develop Locational Standards for Future Land Uses in Unincorporated Monroe County. 2.4 Develop preliminary goals, objectives and policies . 2.5 Develop alternative Future Land Use Concept (Year 2010) 2.6 Develop Recommended Future Land Use Concept 2.1 Graphic Representation - Existing/Approved Developments 2.1.1. Objectives a) To graphically represent the nature and intensity/density of existing and approved land uses for unincorporated Monroe County. 2.1.2. Consultant1s Responsiblities a) To utilize the results of the existing land use survey for unincorporated Monroe County to provide a graphic summary of existing land use patterns. Acreage totals by Township and by Section will be utilized, along with inspection of existing land use maps to generate existin9 land use "summary" graphics for unincorporated Monroe County ( see also b) below, and 2.1.4.). b) To utilize information on approved zoning districts and Devel- opments of Regional Impact to produce an overlay graphic for the existing land use ("summaryll) map. This overlay will indicate approved development not reflected on the existing land use summary graphic and will utilize the same land use categories as those utilized on the existing land use "summary" graphic to be developed in subsection 2.1.1.a) above ( see also 2.1.4. below). 2.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To provide consultant with two copies of the Monroe County Zoning Atlas at the start of this task (see also c) below), in lieu of the consultant making these copies. b) To review map/overlay developed under 2.1.2. a) and b) above. . c) To provide the consultant with information on DR! applications and approved rezoning which are either not reflected on the copy of the zoning atlas provided pursuant to a) above, or are approved following start of this task. This is to provide current information to the consultant on development approvals to be recognized during development of the Future Land Use Map. 2.1.4. Products a) Map and overlay developed under subsection 3.1.2. b) above. 2.2 Graphic Representation of Opportunities/Constraints for Future Development 2.2.1. Objectives a) To map areas subject to development constraints, and to show locations of major physical features (natural or man-made) which represent major opportunties for development. b) To, through use of an overlay mapping procedure, show areas for which development is either preferred, or is subject to constraints. ,2.2.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To gather data on the spatial distribution/locations which are associated with significant opportunities for, or constraints on, future development. These will include: - major wetlands systems (marine, estuarine, and any isolated freshwater systems) - areas currently used, or programmed for use as effluent disposal fields, or sanitary landfill or ashfill sites - areas subject to coastal flooding with wave action (velocity zone) - Major existing and future roadways, and planned roadway alignment~ and associated current volume/capacity constraints or opportunities - Aircraft Noise Impact areas associated with the Key West and Marathon Airports - Major recreational areas - Current and planned water/wastewater treatment facilities and service areas. '. .;....,.. b) The consultant will develop maps and overlays depicting these and other (where applicable), opportunities and constraints (see also 2.2.3. below, and 2.3.1. below, and Z.5.2 2.2.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities To ensure that other county departments respond in a timely manner to requests from the consultant to provide data to be used in the development of map(s) described in subsection 2.2.2.a) above. 2.2.4. Products a) Maps showing information on opportunities and constraints collected in 2.2.2. a) above. 2.3. Develop Locational Standards for Future Land Uses 2.3.1. Objectives To identify general standards for the preferred location of various land use intensities utilizing sound planning principles. Such standards shall be developed with regard to the specifics of Monroe County, and recognize opportunities and constraints identified in subsection 2.3.2.a) below. 2.3.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) Identify general locational standards for land use intensities (see also 2.3.1. above, 2.3.3.a) and 2.3.4. below). b) To recognize current community objectives/policies regarding the future development of the U.S. 1 corridor and other areas for which policy has emerged during, or since, adoption of The Florida Keys Comprehensive Plan. These policies will be considered in identifying general standards for the location of various land use intensities, but are subject to reevaluation (see also 2.3.4. below). 2.3.3. Monroe County Staff Responsiblities a) Provide input for the development of, and review and provide comment on the general standards developed under subsection 2.3.3.a) above. b) Provide information to the consultant on current land use and comprehensive planning policies for areas of unincorporated Monroe County to update consultant on the community's land use objectives. 2.3.4. Listing, by land use intensity category, of appropriate general standards used to define areas suitable for future development. These standards may be based on sound planning principles, may refer to characteristics identified pursuant to subsection 2.2.2. above, may reflect community objectives/policies referred to in subsection 3.3.2.b) above, or be developed by other means. 2.4.' Develop Preliminary Goals, Obj,ectives, and Policies (GOP's) . 2.4.1. Objectives a) To draft GOPs for unincorporated Monroe County's future development. b) To generate conceptual GOP concepts so as:td facilitiate discussion ~y staff and the BOCC for purposes of selecting more specific GOP's (see 7.2 below) and formulating a recommended land Use (lU) plan concept ( see section 2.~ below). 2.4.2. Consultant's Responsibilities To develop, pursuant to subsection 2.2.2 above, preliminary conceptual GOPs. The GOPs at this stage may utilize des- criptions and concepts not reflected in existing analysis and descriptions and may utilize broad ranges of terminology to describe issues and concepts. 2.4.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities To review and provide comment on the alternative GOPs, arrange the BOCC discussion meeting and insure that direction from the BOCC is voted on. 2.4.4. Products a) Broad GOPs for 2010, suitable for continued preparation of Comprehensive Plan Elements and selecting the appropriate and preferred land use concept in Section 2.6 below 2.5 Develop Alternative land Use Concepts for Year 2010 2.5.1. Objectives a) To graphically illustrate different land use concepts for unincorporated Monroe County's future development. b) To generate alternative future land use concepts so as to facilitate discussion by staff and the BOCC for purposes of selecting a recommended future land use concept. 2.5.2. Consultant's Responsibilities To utilize overlays developed pursuant to subsection 2.2.2. above to prepare land use concepts generally meeting the locational standards. The land use concepts may utilize descriptions or categories not reflected on any overlay and may utilize broad ranges of intensity, activity centers and other broadly defined terms to define the land use concepts which are developed. 2.5.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities To review and provide comment on the alternative land use concepts. ., ., .... !.~" .; 2.5.4. Products a) Alternative land use concept maps for 201~, suitable for presentation to the BOCC at workshops. A maximum of three alternatives will be developed. 2.6 Develop a Recommended Land Use Concept Map for Year 2010 2.6.1 Objectives a) To utilize staff reviews to formulate a recommended land use concept for transmittal to the BOCC for their review. b) To describe the rationale for the land use patterns re- flected on the recommended land Use Concept Map for presentation to the BOCC .workshop. 2.6.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To develop a "final" Land Use Concept Map to be recom- mended to the BOCC at a public workshop. This selected concept will be developed after consideration of staff comments on alternative concepts presented pursuant to 2.5 above. b) To prepare, and discuss at the BOCC workshop, a descrip- tion of the rationale associated with the recommended Land Use Concept Map. c) To transmit a memorandum to Monroe County staff providing description/rationale of the recommended Concept Map, for use as handout materials at the BOCC workshop. d) To transmit to BOCC member, and other parties if neces- sary, copies of handout materials provided by the consultant for use at the BOCC workshop. Such materials should be transmitted to BOCC members one week prior to the joint workshop. 2.6.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To schedule a public workshop for consultant's presen- tation of the preferred Land Use Concept Map and associated rationale. This workshop is to be scheduled to occur during week sixteen (16) following contract execution. 2.6.4. Products a) Land Use Concept Map to be recommended to the BOCC. b) Memorandum outlining rationale associated with the recom- mended Land Use Concept Map. TASK 3 - DISTRIBUTION OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON SELECTED lAND USE CONCEPT MAP. This task involves two processes, as follows: . a) Map Traffic Analysis Zones and Water/Wastewater/Solid Waste Planning Areas to facilitate b) below, and b) Assignment of 2010 Development Projections by Traffic Analysis Zone and by Water/Wastewater/Solid Waste Planning Areas, in a manner consistent with the recommended Land Use Concept Plan. 3.1. Map Traffic Analysis Zones and Water/Wastewater/Solid Waste Planning Areas and Assign 2010 Development, Population and Employment Projections by These Sub-Areas of Monroe County. 3.1.1. Objectives a) To provide "subsectors" of Monroe County sized and located so as to permit the analysis of level of service and asso- ciated capital improvements to provide adequate roadways and water/wastewater/solid waste systems to provide services for year 2010 development. b) To provide a spatial matrix on which future development (and associated employment and population) can be distri- buted, so as to produce a detailed spatial distribution of future (2010) development in Monroe County. c) To "distribute" future development anticipated for ,Monroe County in a manner so as to facilitate the development of, and then the "placement" of recommended categories for the Future Land Use Plan Map. d) To provide a basis for Level of Service analyses and other analyses necessary for development of the Traffic Circu- lation, Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer and Solid Waste sub-elements of the comprehensive plan. e) To develop a map showing distribution of future development (2010) to facilitiate the periodic re-evaluation in up- coming years Of the validity of the land use assumption used to assist in the development of the Future Land Use Element to be developed pursuant to this Scope of Services. 3.1.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To obtain maps and background data on Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) from the Florida State Department of Trans- portation staff, and maps of appropriate water, waste- water and solid waste planning areas from the Monroe County Public Works Department. These maps will be revised, as necessary, to facilitate assignment of development projections and other data for unincorporated Monroe County required for transportation network modeling and for water demand and wastewater flow projections. . -.':'}.,'.;;.-; b) To utilize the recommeAded land Use Concept Map developed in Section 2.6 above, and as revised and c~ncurred with by the BOCC, to estimate development projections for year 2010 and other related data by Traffic Analysis lone (TAl) and by water/wasterwater/solid waste planning areas. This data will be graphically represented. This subtask entails the use of the countywide development projections for year 2010 developed in section 1.3 above, and the use of land-use related multipliers developed in section 1.2 above. Resident and seasonal population will be totaled for this purpose to provide development projections by sub-area of Monroe County which reflect a IImaximumll demand on public infrastructure and services ( see also c) below, and 3.1.3.b) below). c) To provide ( and transmit), maps and data to Monroe County staff for review of the development/population projections by TAl and by water/wast~water/solid waste planning areas, and to receive comments from staff as to consistency of the projections with the selected land Use Concept Map developed under 2.6 above, and to also receive and address comments/recommendations as to changes to the proposed development projections developed under 3.1.2.b) above (see also 4.1. b) and c) below, and 5.1 below). 3.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities To review and provide comment on the development/population IIdistributionll by TAl and by water/wastewater/solid' waste planning area, regarding conSistency with the selected land Use Concept Map developed in subsection 2.6 above. 3.1.4. Products a) A spatial distribution of year 2010 development and associated variables, revised as necessary pursuant to Monroe County staff recommendations (see also 4.1.c) below, and 4.2.b) below, and 5.2.2.a) below). b) Maps of Traffic Analysis Zones and water/wastewater/solid waste planning areas for subsequent tasks. ".,:',., . ~., ~-,"<; . TASK 4 - PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF ADEQUACY OF CURRENTLY PLANNED TRANSPORTATION, WATER/WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL · 4.1 Objectives a) To evaluate the level of adequacy of the adopted" Major Thorough- fare Plan" and "Right-of-Way Needs" Maps' network for accommodating future development in Monroe County. b) To provide a comparison of the water/wastewater and solid waste demand and use projections generated using the 2010 development "distributions" produced in subsection 3.1 above, with those projections indicated in adopted water and 201 wastewater systems plans. c) To provide a generalized c04ntywide estimate (for the principal street and highway system), and generalized planning area estimates (for water,wastewater supply/treatment systems and solid waste disposal), of the impact on each public facility which the 2010 development distribution (developed in 3.1) above is anticipated to have on the planned Major Thoroughfare system (for transportation), and is anticipated to have on the adopted 201 Wastewater, adopted water system plans and solid waste disposal plans for Monroe County. Also, to indicate the level of adequacy of the planned road network and water/wastewater/solid waste systems to accomodate year 2010 development projection, as distributed pursuant to the products described under subsection 3.1. above. 4.2 Consultant's Responsibilities a) To develop flow factors, cost factors, disposal factors and other assumptions which are concurred with by various agencies responsible for road network, water/wastewater systems and solid waste planning and improvements. These are to be used in conducting analyses necessary for this and other tasks. b) To utilize 2010 development/population/employment by TAZ (see subsection 3.1 above) to evaluate the adequacy of the adopted Major Thoroughfare Plan's road network to provide traffic circu- lation for year 2010. This will involve the use of existing FOOT Models or comparable model to accomplish an evaluation of the adequacy of the network to accomodate 2010 traffic. c) To utilize 2010 development projections by water/wastewater/solid waste planning areas to assess the adequacy of: the adopted 201 Plan, the adopted water system plan and any adopted or draft solid waste management programs for Monroe County, to provide future water supply, and handle future wastewater flows and handle future solid waste disposal of deficiencies, if any, will be reported (see also 4.3.a) below). .'l',~ . <,,~;-<. . d) To provide (and transmit) .materials containing results of analyses conducted in 4.2.b) and c) above to Monroe Co~nty planning staff for review and comment. Also, to meet with other county departments as requested by Monroe County staff. e) To obtain input from Monroe County departments and other agencies in the form of guidelines and suggestions for the modification of roadway, water, solid waste and wastewater system plans, where necessary, to accommodate future demand for these facilities. 4.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To review and provide comment on consultant's findings from sub- section 4.2.b) and c) above. b) To review consultant's product (see 4.4.a) below), provide comments/ recommendations on same, and coordinate meetings as may be necessary with the consultant and with other county agencies and/or authorities. 4.4. Products A summary assessment to Monroe County staff in the form of a brief memorandum of any deficiencies in the current capital facil- ities. plans for transportation (roadways), water/wastewater systems and solid waste disposal plans as determined by those plans' capabilities to accomodate year 2010 development projections at adequate levels of service (see also 4.3.b) above). TASK 5 ~ DEVELOP DETAILED FUTURE LAND USE MAP This task will be overlapped with Tasks 6 and 7, with analy6is and products associated with Tasks 6 and 7 serving as inputs into the process described in Task 5. . Task 5 has two subtasks as follows: . I 5.1. Develop and Conduct Reviews of Proposed Categories and Applicable Locational Criteria for Defining Future Land Uses on the Future Land Use Map, and 5.2 Apply Land Use Categories to Develop a Detailed Future L,rnd Use Map (first draft) I 5.1 Develop Proposed Categories for Defining Future Land Uses on the Future Land Use Map 5.1.1. Objectives a) To develop proposed categories for the future Land Use Map consistent with Rule 9J-5.006(4)(a) and (b), F.A.C. and to implement rule 9J-5.006(3)(c)7., F.A.C. These proposed land use categories should also exercise the option defined in 9J-5.006(4)(c), F.A.C. to develop "mixed use" categories permitting combinations of development types under discrete land use categories. b) To facilitate the development of the type and amount of land uses shown on the map developed under Task 2.6 above. 5.1.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To utilize the Existing Land Use Survey data, and the analyses conducted pursuant to 9J-5.006(2)(a), F.A.C. (see Task 6), other analyses and data developed pursuant to 9J-5 F.A.C. and proposed policies regarding implemen- tation of the Future Land Use Map located in other elements of the comprehensive plan (from Task 7) to develop a range of categories suitable for application to areas of Monroe County. Such categories shall also meet or exceed re- quirements of 9J-5.006(4), F.A.C. b) To develop locational criteria, by categories shown on the first draft Future Land Use Map, for the appropriate location of each use or combinatiion of uses to be indi- cated on the Future Land Use Map. Also to develop other assumptions which may be necessary for development of the Future Land Use Map. (See also 5.2.2.d) below.) c) Investigate and recommend, where feasible, any develop- ment incentive provisions associated with the application of proposed land use categories. Such provisions may address deficiencies identified in the Florida Keys Com- prehensive Plan. H"~:'4'. -'-'.." d) Develop, where appropr,ate, Future Land Use Map categories which may aid the implementation of policies developed under Task 7.2 below. · To develop Future land Use categories which are suitable for implementation through land development regulations to be developed pursuant to ch. 163.3202, F.S. To transmit materials for, and conduct a workshop during week 24 following contract execution with the BOCC for presentation of, and the receipt of comments/recommendations on, the proposed land use categories and locational criteria developed in a) and b) above and to utilize Monroe County staffs' and the BOCC's input/recommendations provided at this workshop to revise, as necessary, recommended categories and their locational criteria to be utilized on the Future land Use Map. Issues requiring staff and BOCC input at the referenced workshop may include: - determining the degree to which current zoning districts are used to define categories on the Future land Use Map. e) f) - determining the appropriate maximums for development intensities and densities in Monroe County. - the application of development credits for environmen- tally sensitive areas and for the provision of public facilities and the implementation of any system 'of development credits through the application of categories on the Future land Use Map, as a mechanism for natural resource protection. - the use of development incentive provisions based on the adequacy and availability of public facilities and services. - the degree to which mixed use categories should be utilized on the Future land Use Map and the context within which such categories should be used (see also g) below). g) To transmit, following revisions made to the proposed land use cate90ries and associated locational criteria pursuant to 4) above, revised land use categories and locational criteria to the BOCC for purposes of a workshop to be conducted pursuant to h) below. h) To conduct a workshop of the BOCC for the purposes of presenting, and receiving comments/recommendations on, the proposed land use categories and associated locational criteria. Also, consultant will conduct revisions; as necessary, to the categories and/or criteria pursuant to BOCC comments/recommendations (see also 5.1.3.d) below). ,5.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To provide input on, and conduct revisw of, proposed land use categories developed pursuant to the objectives identified in 5.1.1. above, as necessary. b) To provide input pursuant to this task, and pursuant to Task 7, on the utilization of proposed policies located in other elements of the comprehensive plan. 5.1.4. Products A proposed system of future land use categories (see 5.2.2.a) below. 5.2 Apply Land Use Categories to Develop a First Draft Future Land Use , Map 5.2.1. Objectives a) To distribute the various categories of future land uses such that all areas in Monroe County are designated for one or more future land uses. b) To assign proposed land use categories to parcels of land/ areas of Monroe County such that, at a minimum, all develop- ment projected and distributed ( In Task 3 above) can be accommodated. c) To utilize the Future Land Use Map, where appropriate,as an implementation tool for policies in the Future Land Use and other elements in the comprehensive plan developed under Task 7 below. 5.2.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To determine, using data and analysis from Tasks 1 and 6 and using development projections by Traffic Analysis Zone (described in 3.1 above),acreages (by proposed future land use category as described in 5.1.4. a) above) to be shown on the draft Future Land Use Plan Map. b) To integrate plan provisions (policies) described under subsection 7.2 below, and which interrelate with the categories shown on the Future Land Use Map (first draft), into the process described in subsection 5.2.2.b) above. c) To utilize data developed pursuant to Tasks 2,6 and 7 (e.g. existing land use and zoning data, data on the location of natural and/or man-made boundaries, an inventory of natural resources and the location and nature of current/ programmed/planned public facilities and public. service areas to identify boundaries to be utilized for describing the extent of each area designated for one or more future uses. ,'~:' . ""il'"..>,"., To apply locational criteria developed in subsection 5.1.2.b) above, pursuant also to limitations defined. in items a),b), c) above, to determine and map appropriate locations for areas/parcels to be shown under each proposed future land use category on the Future land Use Map. (See also 5.1.2.b) above) . To transmit materials for and assist the County staff in the conducting of workshops for the purpose of reviewing and providing comment on assumptions used to develop the draft Future land Use Map, and on the detailed pattern of future land uses shown on the draft map. Also to respond, if necessary, to recommedations by the staff and BOCC for change to the draft Future land Use Map. 5.2.3 Monroe County Staff Responsibi-lities d) e) a) To review, and provide input on, consultant's drafts of the Future land Use Map, on locational criteria used to develop such map, and to provide comment on other assump- tions utilized in developing such map. b) To schedule BOCC workshops and public participation meeting as designated in Exhibit A for review of assumptions to be utilized in development of the Future land Use Map (first draft), and for review of the first draft Future land Use Map, and for discussion and obtaining recommendations on policy (see Task 7) which interacts with the Future land Use Map. Such workshops may be scheduled in conjuction with additional activities ongoing in Task 7, and shall be subject to limitations described in subsection 5.1.3.c) above. 5.2.4, Products a) A first draft Future land Use Map consistent with require- ments of Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. Also, a description of each land use category utilized on the first draft Future land Use Map identifying permitted uses and density/intensity and identifying policies (see Task 7) which impact the application of each category (see also 5.3.2.b) below). b) A memorandum documenting locational criteria ~tilized in development of the Future land Use Map described in a) above, and documenting other assumptions utilized in developing the first draft map (see also 5.3.2.b) below). 5.3. BOCC Review of First Draft Future land Use (Plan) Map 5.3.1. Objectives a) To facilitate BOCC review of the consultant's first draft of the Future land Use Map. b) To facilitate public discussion before the BOCC at a publicly- noticed workshop on the (PARCEl-SPECIFLC) land use categories proposed on the first draft Future land Use Map, and obtain public comments on same, particularly from property owners regarding the designation of their property on the map, and provide opportunity for owners and interested parties to request changes to the proposed (draft) Future land Use Map. c) To provide an opportunity for consultant to provide recom- mendations to the BOCC on requests to redesignate areas or individual parcels on the draft Future land Use Map. d) To gain BOCC concurrence (not final approval) on the first draft Future land Use Map to be utilized for public facilities impact analyses. ' 5.3.2. Consultant1s Responsibilities a) To transmit the products identified in subsection 5.2.4 a) and b) above (future land use categories, related policies, and draft Future land Use Map), and to present same at a publicly-noticed workshop of the BOCC, to re- ceive comment on the consistency of the proposed Future land Use Map with the selected land Use Concept Map and associated rationale (described as a product under sub- sections 2.6.4. above). Comment from the BOCC shall be noted by the consultant and be addressed by the ,consul- tant during work under subsection 7.3.2.a) below. The BOCC shall limit public comment on the Future land Use Map during this hearing to comment of the nature of the categories of Future land Uses (see 5.1.4.a) proposed for use, and on locational criteria used to assist in making decisions on the location of various designations on the Future land Use Map. Public comment on parcel- specific land use designations shall be deferred to public participation workshops arranged by Monroe County during the week of March 18, 1990. c) To assist the Monroe County staff with a series of duly- noticed public participation workshops throughout Monroe County, and to transmit materials for such workshops to the staff, to explain the nature and function of the draft Future land Use Map, to provide information on the asso- ciated categories of land uses and applicable regulations, and on policy interrelated to the draft Future land Use Map. Such public participation shall be conducted for the purpose of providing information to residents, property owners, and other interested individuals on the proposed category applied on the first draft Future land Use Map to each individual parcel within each subarea for which a workshop is being conducted. A maximum of three (3) such workshops shall be conducted. The consultant shall be responsible for responding to questions regarding the proposed land use classification system, the first draft Future land Use Map, and associated policies affecting the implementation of the proposed categories. 5.3-.3. Monroe County Staff Respon~ibili.ties a) To establish the boundaries of a maximum of three (3) subareas of Monroe County consistent with subsection 5.3.2.a) above' for the purposes of conducting public participation on the first draft Future Land Use Map pursuant to subsection 5.3.2.c) above. The consultant will assist in determining such boundaries at the request of Monroe County staff. To schedule, and to provide notice to the public of the BOCC workshop to be conducted during week 27. And provide notice for public participation workshops conducted pur- suant to subsection 5.3.2.c) above. b) c) To schedule and provide public notice for a maximum of three (3) public workshops conducted pursuant to 5.3.2.c) above, and to be held during week 28. To maintain record of the proceedings of workshops des- cribed in subsections 5.3.2.b) and c) above, for the purpose of documenting the public participation program. To provide recordation of requests for changes to the first draft Future Land Use Map submitted by property owners or their authorized representatives, or by other residents of Monroe County. Notice for the Public Partici- pation workshops shall also describe a procedure by which requests for change can be submitted to the consultant for consideration following the conclusion of the workshop. Also, notice shall be provided at the workshops conducted pursuant to this section of a date certain by which all requests for change should be submitted in order to be considered for inclusion/change on the final recommended Future Land Use Map described in 9.4. below. Such date shall be set for a maximum of 10 working days following the date of the final workshop conducted pursuant to this subsection. d) e) To provide comment on consultant's recommendations de- veloped in response to any requests for change to proposed land use categories and/or their proposed placement on the first draft Future Land Use Map. 5.3.4. Products f) a) A (proposed) first draft Future land Use Map, revised as necessary pursuant to comments/recommendations resulting from BOCC workshops described in section 5.3.2. above (see also 7.3.2.a) below). b) Policies, as appropriate ( and if necessary), for which implementation is tied to the Future Land Use Map, and which are developed pursuant to Task 7 below, as revised following BOCC workshops conducted under section 5.3.2. above. TASK 6 - PHASE II DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS BY ELEMENT This task is overlapped with Tasks 5 and 7. Certain data items developed pursuant to this task serve as inputs for Task 5 (e.g. see t.1.2.a) above), and for inputs for Task 7. This task is comprised of two subtasks, as follows: 6.1. Data Collection and Analysis Pursuant to Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. 6.2 Data and Analysis Compilation into a Draft Technical Support Document (TSD) and obtain an "Unofficial" Department of Community Affairs Review of the TSD. These subtasks are detailed below. 6.1. Data Collection and Analysis Pursuant to Rule 9J-5. F.A.C. 6.1.1. Objectives a), To collect, for each element identified as a required comprehensive plan element by, FAC 9J-5 all data required by 9J5, for each element, and to document such data. b) To conduct all analyses identified in 9J-5 for each com- prehensive plan element, and also conduct other analyses if determined by the consultant to be necessary for pur- poses of preparing a defensible comprehensive plan for Monroe County. Also, to document such analyses and iden- tify conclusions developed from such analyses. c) To provide data and analyses useful for development of work products identified under Tasks 5,7,and 8. 6.1.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To carry out primary and secondary data collection and analyze such data to whenever possible, generate conclusions/ findings useful for preparation of work products identified in Tasks 5,7, and 8 of this Scope of Services (see also 6.2.1.c) below). b) To resolve, by means of negotiation with the Florida Department of Community Affairs personnel responsible for pre-adoption and post-adoption (compliance) reviews of the comprehensive plan for Monroe County pursuant to s.163.3184 (6) and (8), F.S., any questions arising from either: interpretation of 9J-5 data and analysis requirements, or the use of substitute data in lieu of required data identified in 9J-5, or interpretation Qf 9J-5.005(2) (a), F.A.C. requlrlng linkage between plan goals, objecti~es and policies, and data collection and analysis conducted pursuant to 9J-5, or - questions concerning DCA approval of data collection and/or analysis methodologies. Develop data and analyses in a manner condusive to the update of such data, and conclusive to periodic reeval- uation of conclusions drawn from that data, in order to facilitate the implementation of 9J-5.005 (7) (b), F.A.C. 6.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities c) To facilitate, to the maximum extent possible, the pro- vision of available data to the consultant (in a timely manner) from other county agencies. 6.1.4. a) Data and analysis conducted pursuant to 9J-5, F.A.C. (see also 5.1.2.a) above). a) 6.2 Com ilation of Data and Anal sis into a Draft Technical Su ort Document TSD and obtain DCA and Staff Review of TSD 6.2.1. Objectives a) To present all data and analyses conducted pursuant to 6.1. above in the form of tables, maps, charts, graphs and "write-ups", with sources identified for all data. b) To provide, only where necessary, documentation of metho- dologies used to conduct analyses developed in 6.1. above. c) To compile data and analysis developed in 6.1. above into a single draft document suitable for publication as part of all of a Technical Support Document which may be subse- quently indexed, in part or in whole, to the comprehensive plan document described in 9.4.a) below. (See also 9.2.C) be 1 ow. ) d) To effectuate, if possible, an early review of the draft document described in c) above by the staff of the DCA, and by Monroe County staff, for consistency with 9J-5, F.A.C., and to obtain responses/comments/recommendations from the DCA (on items where DCA, in the course of a review, has made an unofficial determination that data and analysis provided do not meet criteria of 9J-5) as to changes which have to be effectuated to achieve consistency of the data/analy- sis with 9J-5. 6.2.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To prepare the draft TSD pursuant to objectives outlined in subsection 6.2.1. above. b) To transmit the draft TSD to DCA staff and request an unofficial review of, and comment on same. ^\._..~'''~;,''f - c) To receive DCAls and Monroe County staffls.comments and, where available, DCAls recommendations pertaining to consist- ency of the data and analysis contained in the TSD with requirements of Rule 9J-5. d) To revise the TSD as required to achieve a favorable finding of consistency with 9J-5, from DCA, and to address Monroe County staff comments provided pursuant to subsection 6.2.3.a} below. 6.2.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To conduct review and provide comment on the draft TSD simultaneously with DCA review of the TSD. 6.2.4. Products a} TSD, as revised pursuant to subsection 6.2.2.d) above, suitable for providing background data, analysis and support for goals, objectives, and policies described in 7.2.4.a} below (and included in the draft plan document described in 9.4.a) below). TASK 7 ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENT PREPARATION , This task will occur simultaneously with Task 5 and 6, and ~ill be comple- mented by the development of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) to be developed under Task 8 below. The CIE is the only comprehensive plan element not prepared under this task. This task consists of seven subtasks, listed and described below. 7.1 Determine a suitable format to be used consistently for each element of the plan document, including a consistent format for maps, and a recommended document size and structure for publication of the plan document. 7.2 Develop goals, objectives, and polices for each required element (except the capital improvements elem~nt) of the draft comprehensive plan. 7.3 Develop final draft of the Future Land Use Map, and other maps which serve as policy tools. 7.4. Prepare documentation of implementation mechanisms as necessary, to be contained in sections of the draft plan containing G/O/P, which will facilitate the achievement of such G/O/P. 7.5. Prepare a section of the draft comprehensive plan which identifies monitoring and evaluation procedures required by 9J-5.005(7) F.A.C. 7.6. Conduct two BOCC workshops to review Final GOPs and Land Use Plan. 7.7. Conduct two Planning Commission public hearings to hear comments and make recommendations to BOCC. 7.1 Develop Plan Format and Structure 7.1.1. Objectives a) To determine a format suitable for publication of the comprehensive plan document. b) To determine a format suitable for producing each element of the plan document. c) To develop a draft Table of Contents for the comprehensive plan document described in 9.4.a) below. 7.1.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To recommend an appropriate size, scale, and format for maps, tables and other plan document components (see also 7.1.3.a) below). b) To recommend to staff a consistent format suitable for the production of comprehensive plan elements, considering such items as requiremen'ts for indexing between TSD and the plan document (see also 6.2.2.e) above 7.1.3.a) below). . ."':'~"/.' c) To develop, and recommend to staff, a proposed Table of Contents for development of the comprehensJve plan document. 7.1.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) Review and approve document format presented by the consul- tant under 7.1.2.a) and b) above. b) Review and approve the proposed Table of Contents for the plan document developed under 7.1.2.c) above pursuant to 7.1.1.c) above, and approve, or approve with revisions, or work with consultant to develop an alternative Table of Contents for development of the comprehensive plan document. 7.1.4. Products a) Written material describing plan document format and Table. of Contents (see also 7.2.2.b) below, and 7.4.2.b) below). 7.2 Develop Final Draft Goals, Objectives, Policies 7.2.1. Objectives a) To develop draft goals, objectives and policies (G/O/P) to address deficiencies or problems identified. To develop draft G/O/P to meet requirements of 9J-5, F.A.C., and to be consistent with the requirements of 9J-5~021, F.A.C. regarding local plan consistency with the Compre- hensive Regional Policy Plan and regarding consistency with the State of Florida Comprehensive Plan (see also 7.2.2.a) below). b) To utilize data and analysis described under Task 2 above to provide the basis for G/O/P developed for each element of the comprehensive plan (see also 7.2.2.a) below). 7.2.2. Consultant's Responsibilities c) a) To develop G/O/P for each comprehensive plan element re- quired pursuant to 9J-5, F.A.C., and meeting objectives 7.2.1.a) through c} above. b) To document G/O/P developed under 7.2.2.a} above in a manner consistent with the plan document format described in subsection 7.1.4.a) above. c} To transmit G/O/P developed under a} above, and documented pursuant to b} above, to staff for comment and/or recom- mendations (see also d) below, and 7.2.3.a) below"and 7.4.2.d) below, and 7.5.2.c) below}. NOTE: Consultant and Monroe County have no obligation to prepare the port element of the plan. The Key West Seaport is wholly within the City Limits of Key West and not controlled by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners. d) To respond to staff comments/recommendations provided pursuant to 7.2.3.a) below. · 7.2.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To review, for each comprehensive plan element, draft G/O/P prepared by the consultant, and provide comments and/or recommendations as necessary (see also 7.2.2.c) above). 7.2.4. Products a) Draft of G/O/P for all comprehensive plan elements, ex- cept Capital Improvements Element (see also 5.1.2.a) above, and 5.2.2.b) above, and 6r2.4.a) above and 8.4.4.a) below). 7.3 Develop Final Draft of the Future Land Use Map, and other Maps 7.3.1. Objectives a) To finalize the Future Land Use Map. b) To develop and finalize all other maps required (or recommended by the consultant) for inclusion in the plan document. 7.3.2 Consultant's Responsibilities a) To utilize the (revised) first draft Future Land Use Map described under 5.3.4.a) and: i) revise as necessary to achieve consistency with, or to facilitiate the implementation of any policies developed pursuant to subtask 7.2. above. ii) revise as necessary to address comments/recommendations received by the consultant at the workshop conducted under subsection 5.3.2.b) above. b) To utilize the final Future Land Use Map as developed (revised) under a) above to revise the development dis- tributions by TAZ and water/wastewater/solid waste planning areas so as to reflect the changes made to the first draft Future Land Use Map during development of the map described in 5.3.4.a) above. This will generate a finalized spatial distribution of 2010 development, and associated data, suitable for public facilities analyses. (See also 8.2.a) below). c) Conduct, by use of an iterative process, a highway system alternatives analysis using current information and data generated by FDOT and the County, to develop a highway and major street network to provide for adequate levels of service in 2010. NOTE: This analysis and other transportation analyses, and other sections of this Scope of Services per- taining to development of the Traffic Circulation Element for the,compr~hensive plan, assumes the availability of a suitably validate~ model, and the ability of the consultant to receive necessary assistance from FOOT, including the av~ilability of computer time if necessary, from th~ Florida Department of Transportation pursuant to subsection 9J-5.002(4) and (5), 9J-5.007(2)(b) and (3)(b) 3, F.A.C., and s.163.3204, F.S. Where a validated model or FOOT computer time is not available on a timely basis, this Scope of Services shall be subject to amendment. It is also understood that Monroe County is consid- ering amending this scope of service to add a more in depth Transportation Planning element to include the development of a specialized Transportation Model and Methodology for Capacity Analysis. This scope of service will be amended to include said additional scope. d) To develop other maps, as required by 9J-5, F.A.C. and/or as determined by the consultant to be necessary for devel- opment of the comprehensive plan document. e) To transmit products described in 8.3.4.b) below to Monroe County staff for review and comment/recommendations. 7.3.3. Monroe County Staff Assistance a) To review and provide comment on all maps described under 7.3.4.a), b), and c) below and to facilitate (where necessary) the timely response by county departments and agencies, FOOT, DCA and the Florida Keys Aquaduct Authority to requests by the consultant for information or for review of consultant's map products. 7.3.4. Products a) Final draft of the Future land Use Map (see also 7.3.2.e) above). b) Future Traffic Circulation Map, including year 2010 net- work (see also 7.3.2.e) above). c) Other plan document maps for policy implementation or for definition of areas referenced in the comprehensive plan. 7.4. Document Implementation Provisions 7.4.1. Objectives a) To identify, in general terms, implementation mechanisms in sections on G/O/P in the document. " . 7.4;2. Consultant's Responsibiliti~s a) To develop objectives and/or policies whic~ identify imple- mentation mechanisms pursuant to the intent of 9J-5.005(6), F.A.C. (see also 7.4.3.a) below). b) To integrate these implementation mechanisms as part of the format developed for each plan element~ as described in the product listed in 7.1.4.a) above. To identify implementation mechanisms in policies developed under this subtask, so as to provide certain general guidelines for the development of land development regulations pursuant to s.163.3203, F.S., following completion of work under this Scope of Services. To transmit proposed implementation mechanisms to staff for review, comment and/or recommendations simultaneous with proposed maps (see 7.3.2.e) above), and with proposed plan monitoring, update, and evaluation procedures (see 7.5.2.c) below). c) d) 7.4.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To review, and provide comments/recommendations regarding proposed plan implementation provisions developed pursuant to 7.4.2.a) above. 7.4.4. Products Plan implementation objectives and policies identifying programs, activities, and the nature of land development regulations which will implement the comprehensive plan. These will be integrated with, and will be transmitted as part of the goals, objectives, and policies described in subsection 7.2.4.a) above. 7.5 Develop Plan Monitoring, Update and Evaluation Procedures 7.5.1. Objectives To develop plan monitoring, update and evaluation procedures and integrate these procedures into the comprehensive plan document. 7.5.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) Identify procedures which can be adopted (as part of the comprehensive plan), and which are designed to: - provide for continuous monitoring of the impact .and the successes/failures of the comprehensive plan, and are suitable for use in the preparation of Evaluation and Appraisal Reports on the revised comprehensive plan .-..~ '. provide for plan evaluation, and facilitate update of the comprehensive plan' following the evaluation. . and which will meet the requirements of 9J-5.005(7), F.A.C. b) , Revise, as necessary, any monitorin9' updating and eval- uation procedures developed under a) above in' response to Monroe County staff comments/recommendations. c) Transmit revised monitoring, evaluation and updating pro cedures to Monroe County staff along with G/O/P and plan implementation provisions enumerated above to Monroe County staff for review and comment/recommendation. 7.5.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibi.lities To review, and provide recommendations on monitoring, update and evaluation procedures developed pursuant to subsection 7.5.2. above. 7.5.4. Products a) A section of the draft comprehensive plan containing monitoring, updating, and evaluation procedures. 7.6. BOCC review of GOP's and LUP Map 7.6.1. Objective To provide the BOCC opportunity to review and comment on Final GOPs and final LUP map 7.6.2. Consultant's Responsiblitities a) To attend two BOCC workshops, provide a review of material and answer questions. b) To provide appropriate number of drafts for BOCC review. 7.6.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilties a) To schedule workshops with BOCC for weeks 31 and 33 for the purpose of facilitating BOCC review of the final draft of GOPs and Land Use Map b) To provide a record of proceedings of the workshops held for purpose of documenting decisions, comments and recommen- dations. c) To receive direction from the BOCC and relay that direction to the consultant d) To review and comment on the draft GOPs and Land Use Map. . 7..7 Planning Commission (PC) as LPA, Public ~earing and Recommendations to the SOCC · 7.7.1. Objective Meet the requirements of FLORIDA STATUTE 163.3174. Provide the Monroe County Planning Commission the opportunity to review, comment and make recommendations to the SOCC 7.7.2. Consultant's Responsibilitiy a) To attend two SOCC public hearings, provide a review of material and answer questions. b) To provide appropriate number of drafts for the PC. 7.7.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To schedule Public Hearings and properly advertise for the weeks of 31 and 33. b) To provide record of proceedings . I'~'''- TASK 8 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PREPARATION . 8..1' Objectives . a) To prepare a Capital Improvements Element consistent with 9J- 5.016, F.A.C., and consistent with other plan elements developed under Task 7 above. 8.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To project costs of providing infrastructure and services necessary to achieve proposed levels of service, for year 2010, and using the development scenario projected on the map showing development by subarea in Monroe County as revised pursuant to subsection 7.3.2.b) above. Other maps, data and policy developed pursuant to Task 7 (and particularly the Future Traffic Circulation Map developed in subsection 7.3.2.c) ~bove will also be utilized to develop cost data for capital improvements. b) To project the revenue stream to be generated by all revenue sources currently available to the county for capital improvements, by use of a series of analyses identified under 9J-5.061(2)(f),F.A.C., and to determine projected level of revenue surplus/deficit to offset costs identified for the period covering ncurrent yearn, 2010, and to address existing deficiencies. c) To consider and recommend, if necessary, modifications to proposed levels of service, and/or alternative revenue sources for providing necessary capital improvements. d) To develop and recommend, on the basis of the county's current Capital Improvements Program, and on the basis of associated cost and revenue projections and policy developed pursuant to f) below, a revised Capital Improvements Program for the initial 5-years following the anticipated adoption date of the revised comprehensive plan consistent with projections of revenue sources for the same 5-year period. e) To identify existing facility plans which may require revisions pursuant to capital improvements needs projected in subsection a) above. f) To develop and recommend G/O/P for the Capital Improvements Element consistent with 9J-5~016(3), F.A.C. This entails the development and recommendation of policies, standards and provisions regarding the implementation of capital improvements, and the mandatory consistency of proposed development with level of service standards, and other provisions in 9J-5.016(4),F.A.C. (see also d) above.) g) To develop and recommend requirements and procedures for the annual revision of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) h) To consider, during the development of the Capital Improvements Element, plans and procedures of county departments, where these are consistent with other plan elements and with proposed provisions in the CIE. .' i) To conduct meetings with Monroe County agencies including the office of Budget, necessary to collect required d!ta, establish or revise recommended levels of service, assess existing defici- encies, project the costs of capital improvements, identify policies for capital improvements programming and other tasks associated with the preparation of the CIE. j) To conduct, following preparation of the draft CIE, a workshop event with the BOCC for purposes of facilitating review, comment and recommendation for revisions (as necessary) to the draft CIE. The consultant will receive the BOCC's comments and recom- mendations on the draft CIE at this workshop. k) To transit copies of the draft element to PFCAC members and staff in preparation for the workshop described in subsection j) above. 8.3 Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To facilitate meetings between the consultant and other Monroe County staff, scheduled in a timely manner so as to permit the development of the CIE. b) To review, and provide comment on, the consultant's draft CIE. c) To schedule a workshop event of the BOCC for the purpose of a consultant's presentation of the draft CIE, and to facilitate the receipt of BOCC comments/recommendations on the draft CIE. This workshop is to be scheduled for week 33. 8.4 Products a) A draft of the CIE required by 9J-5, F.A.C. ',~' '-;t.(:J';'~; ~.' !.~',i'" ...' I' TASK 9 -' PREPARE COMPLETE DRAFT OF PLAN AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENTS . 9.1. Objective To revise the draft plan elements pursurant to staff and BOCC comments received during workshops held pursuant to sections 7 and 8 above. 9.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To review the comments/recommendations on the draft comprehensive plan elements made by the BOCC during the course of reviews during Tasks 7 and 8, and to recommend changes to address BOCC comments/ recommendations to the draft plan. b) To conduct reviews of proposed changes (recommended pursuant to a) above) with Monroe County staff and departments as necessary. These reviews are conducted to obtain concurrence with staff as to the changes to the plan elements proposed by the consultant. 9.3. Monroe County Staff Responsiblilities To review, and facilitate the timely review by other county staff and agencies, the revisions to the plan document by the consultant pursuant to 9.2. b) above. 9.4. Products a) , Final consultant drafts of plan and Technical Support documents. '~~:...~: '" ~.' -.; TASK 10 - TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL DRAFT PLAN BOCC FOR PRE-COMPLIANCE REVIEW . PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLAN 10.1. Objectives a) To deliver the Task g products to the BOCC b) To transmit the proposed plan (with recommendations) to the BOCC . c) To complete a BOCC precompliance hearing on the proposed compre- hensive plan held pursuant to s.163.3184(15)(b)I.,F.S. 10.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To transmit copies of the proposed plan document, Technical Support Document to staff, and to provide for distribution to the BOCC. b) To assist the staff in conducting a maximum of two public hearings to be held by the BOCC to present materials for review, comment and finally, for the adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan document. c) To receive comment from the public, and the BOCC at the first pre-compliance public hearing held pursuant to subsection b) above, and to make changes, (as necessary) to the plan document and to address concerns raised by the BOCC members and/or the public. NOTE: This public hearing is to be held with the intent of obtaining public input, and provide opportunities for comments and recommendations by BOCC members prior to the second BOCC hearing conducted pursuant to e) below. This is intended to reduce, to a minimum, changes which may be requested following the DCAls compliance review, and which may necessitate a "second round" of compliance review by the DCA. d) To deliver copies of each of the following to BOCC members following revisions pursuant to c) above: TSD Proposed Plan Document No (major) changes to either the proposed plan are anticipated at this final public hearing. e) To transmit materials for, and conduct a second pre-compliance public hearing of the BOCC, pursuant to s.163.3184 (15)(b) 1., F.S. to review the final draft of the plan document (along with its companion TSD), to authorize the transmittal of the proposed comprehensive plan to the DCA (pursuant to s.163.3184 (3)(a), F.S.) for compliance review. This Scope of Services anticipates that a very minimum amount of change be made at this BOCC public hearing, and assumes that major pub'ic comment and resultant changes to the plan document and TSD, will occur ~uring the course of the PC hearings and the public hearing conducted by the BOCC (described in subsection b) above). The consultant will also prepare any additional changes necessary to the plan document and TSD, following the second BOCC pre-compliance and authorization to transmit meeting prior to the transmittal of proposed plan and TSD to DCA ' f) Following conclusion of the BOCC public hearing authorizing the transmittal of the proposed plan to the DCA (see e) above), to reproduce and transmit copies of the plan document and the TSD, to the DCA and to any other unit of local government that has filed a written request with the BOCCfor the proposed plan pur- suant to s.163.3184 (3)(a),F.S., ~ith up to a maximum of 6 copies for transmitt~l to such local governments, 10.3. Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To schedule and provide due public notice as prescribed by Florida Statute for the "pre-compliance review" BOCC public meetings, and for all public hearin~s conducted by the PC and/or the BOCC, and described under 1.2.b} and e) above. b) To maintain a record of the proceedings of the public workshop and public hearings described in this task. 10.4 Products Final plan document, and TSD ( not subject to compliance review but to be transmitted to the DCA as background material for the plan document, and to demonstrate compliance with data and analysis requiremwnts of 9J-5, F.A.C.). Under this task, the proposed plan, and TSD, are transmitted to the DCA, and the adopted plan will then be subject to review by the DCA pursuant to s.163.3184 (3)(a), F.S. TASK~l - COORDINATION WITH THE DCA AND THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION . ~C . · . 11.1 Objectives a) To provide for ongoing contact with the DCA and the RPC during the duration of the plan revision process to ensure plan compliance with the State Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan, and Florida law and Rules. 11.2. Consultant's Responsibilities a) To, where necessary, communicate by phone, in writing, and/or meet with representatives of the DCA, the RPC and with other state and regional agencies to resolve issues and obtain input relating to the plan revision.process. This task is included in this Scope of Services to facilitate the issuance of a Notice of Intent finding the revised plan in compliance with state laws and rules, including (but not limited to) ch. 85-57 (the state Comprehensive Plan Act), the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan, ch.163 (the local Government Comprehensive Planning and land Development Regulation Act), chs. 9J-5 and 9J-ll and 9J-12, F.A.C. and ch 380 (the land and Water Management Act). b) To achieve the issuance of a Notice of Intent finding the plan in compliance by the DCA. However, where the DCA fails to issue such a Notice of Intent as a result of DCA objections to changes to the comprehensive plan which have been requested by the BOCC and which have not been recommended by the consultant, 'then the consultant shall not be responsible for DCAls failure to issue a Notice of Intent finding the plan in compliance with state law and rules. TASK r2 : CITIZEN PARTICIPATION , . . 12.1 Objectives a) To address the provisions regarding public participation contained in FAC 9J-5.004 b) To achieve public input and comments during the Comprehensive Plan preparation and adoption process. 12.2 Consultant's Responsibilities a) To be accessable to county staff for consultation regarding public participation. b) To attend appropriate public participation meetings and explain comprehensive plan progress and proposed objectives as requested by Monroe County staff. c) To provide copies of plan drafts for public participation as requested by Monroe County and as required by the agreement. 12.3 Monroe County Staff Responsibilities a) To prepare public participation program in accordance with F.A.C. 9J-5.004. b) To arrange the public participation meetings and provide for the leadership of those meetings. c) To insure proper recordation of meetings and proper response to public comments. d) To insure that opportunities for written comments are provided. e) To provide proper notice. f) To make available in appropriate places at appropriate times copies of drafts and other documentation. 12.4. Products A public participation program prepared by the Monroe County staff.