Resolution 362-1991
RESOLUTION NO.
362 -,1991
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE SUBMISSION
OF PRE-APPLICATIONS TO THE FAA FOR FEDERAL FUNDING
FOR THE MARATHON AIRPORT AND THE KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the submission of Pre-Applications
to the FAA for federal funding for the }'iarathon Airport and the
Key West International Airport is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the 9th
October
day of
, A.D. 1991.
c
c
c
,
L.
r.
MAYOR WilhelJnina Harvey Yes
COr~TSSIONER Jack London Yes
COMMISSIONER Douglas Jones Yes
COMMISSIONER A.Earl Cheal Yes
COMMISSIONER John Stormont Yes
,
c
L..:..,
C
LL
u...
~"'"l
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
. ... dol, _
\.k:).~.aJ~ ~~ ~
BY: \
MAYOR/CHAIRMAN
(Seal)
At test: DANNY 1.. ~OW:IAGE, Clerk
~L~~,.i).~
By
Dale
O~~y ~o~~~E
(305) 294-4641
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MAYOR, Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1
Mayor Pro Tem, Jack London, District 2
Douglas Jones, District 3
A Earl Cheal, District 4
John Stormont, District 5
.
September 13, 1991
Bart Vernace
FAA Airport District Office
9677 Tradeport Drive
Suite 130
Orlando, FL 32827-5397
Dear Mr. Vernace:
Attached are the hard copies of the Pre-applications for Key
West and Marathon Airport projects.
As we discussed on the telephone recently we are happy to submit
these to you on a short notice basis however the fOllowing con-
siderations should be noted:
A. We reserve the right to revise the estimated costs figures
submitted as the projects are further along in the design and
permitting phases.
B. We anticipate that all work except the terminal buildings
themselves will be financed by FAA Discretionary Funds on a
90% basis whenever eligible.
C. Projects of this magnitude require a long and involved
permitting process in Monroe County. We do not control this
process. Although we anticipate to start these projects in
Fiscal 1992, the permitting and public hearing process may
extend the start date.
D. Because of the short notice the Monroe County Bo~rd of
County Commissioners has not ratified these documents.
.., :
. I
I
I
Resolutions approving these documents will be before the BOCC on
October 9, 1991. Since all of the elements in the Key West and
Marathon Airport projects have been previously approved by the
BOCC and since funding for match monies have been set aside in
our capital improvement plan, I believe approval will be a for-
mality.
Sincerely,
@~~\=ector
Community Services Division
.~I"
..
A"'r"'-
.
."'''''..- ..... ...... . tIL. ...... ~f..~ ~'ti.___.........
fE~ERAL ASsr.,.... ..",CE Sent. 5. 1 qql
to TYKOI~ L ....1'1 MCIIWC ." .,101'1 ...- ~Clf\ .,......-
A<<;Jc..tioIt : ~tioIt N/A N/A
C~ ~C~ 4. a,&l'IlllCClWU .... nMAAl AOv.ct ,...., ~-
O~ ~o.~
to Ut'\.JC,UC1' "'OMIAl'lOtI ..-.-.....".
I.eQaI ~. Florida ~ionel u.It Convnissioners
Monroe County, Board of County
.
~ ~ titt. C*lfttt. ,I.t... .-d lip c.oHl ..,.. " ~ ~ ftJ .... ~ to .. ~ 01\ _n.t inwofwW'lG
"'" eoQIaltOft c- WN codeJ -
-
P.O. Box 1029 Mr. Peter Horton, Director -
Key.West, Florida 33040 Community Services Division
(305) 292-4500
.. IMf"\.O't'P 1OC1ml"1CA""" W\IlIdI" (I1N): J. 'hPt 01 ~: ",,"," ~... .."., lit boa' [!J
. [IITl-16 01010 7 1 4 19 r A. Stal. K. ,~4o,.1I actalf DilL
..~ l "-iii ConItoIed ~ ftJ HiQt'4r ~
. c UufticipeI- .I, P"IMte ~ .
L Tf'P<< 01 ~~ D.T~ K ~ Tro. . - .
a..... o Corrtiftye~ O~. E lNerlUliI L~ ."
. ~ enlet ~tiI 1en.r(I' ift boa(et). 0 0 F.~ .. Profd Or~tIOft
G "*"" ~ H. Ottw ~
A h:r...- A.~ . 0Icr_ A.1Ifd C. ~ Duration
D o.c:r.a.- ~1tIClft ()lNr 1~#YJ: L IWIIIOI n:lllU.L. ~
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION .,
ORLANDO AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE
IL elTALOO 01 '1Ol1UL DOMunc I 2 ToT. 1 I 01 6 ft. CCIQllIt'11Vl mu 01 ~ PflOJC"Cf:
AUlSTAItCI tf\JtAltlt KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
1Tn.E; Airport Improvement Program (See attached Part IV Narrative for
IL AIlU.S ."ICTal IT ~CT (et"',. COUftW.. ,I.t.... .Ie" project items.)
.
Key West, Monroe County, Florida
,
II, ~~CT; ,.. ~USSlOfCAL 1:WS11t1Cn Of'.
~o.l' &d."'Y o.~ .~nl ;b.~
9/3/91 9/1/94 15th 15th
IL UTltIATn) 'UNOINO: 11.1& AHt.lCA,..,.. WLltCT TO IIltVlfW 11' STAn EnCU'\'1Vf 0't00 1~71 ~.,
. Fediftal I 2,707,894 .00 . va THIS PAEAPPUCAnc:lWAPPUCA'TlON WAS WOE AVA.U.kE TO nE
$TATE PEOJTJVe OAOER 12]12 ~ ~ PEI/'EW ON
ta.~t . 451,316 .00 DATE
.
c. S:la\e I 451,316 .00 o PAOGIUJI tS NOT ~ BY E.O '2.172
ta NO
d Loc:8I . .... o OR ~ HAS NOT Il€EH sa.ECTED IV "ATE FOR PIEVEW
.
.~ I JlO
.. Ptogr- ~ . JlO I'. .1HI ~ DIlJ"'O'JIIn 0IIl1MY ~ DOT1
V TOTAL. . 3,610,526 JlO .0 y- · .'"Y...~OI\~ ONo
IL 10 1M! NST 0/1 .....lDIOWUDOI MO ~. au. OAtA"!MI AHUCA1ION"~noe. Aa( nlUC ANO ~ 1HI ooc::uwrWr..... aOM ~.
~ ..1tCOOo'P.."O IOO't Of' 1M( Uf'UCANT......,... ~ WIU.~YIImC ftC AnACMID ~.1HI A&MT~. ..AItOC
..T~~'101~~-lU'- I. T.... Director, cT~~
e er orton COl1ll1unitv Services Div. (305)292-4500
.~l;--~~t~~ . o.te Sq'Id
q-Co-,\
PT...ovf\C.O<too,\& NoI ua.a:>MeU S~"CIatd "Ot'" .2. ,'li:..... .66
P,nc,.o.d 0, oue ~..,_. A. 'OJ
. -
"
. ~ ~
PART II
1. oOes'this assistance recuest require Stale, local, regional or other priority rating?
2. Does this assistance require State or local advisory, educational or health clearance'
Yes' X
No
Yes X
No
3. Does ttJis assistance request reCJIire Clearinghouse review'
Yes
X No
'.
4. Does this assistance request require State, local, regional or other planning approval?
5. Is' ~'j"oPo;d'p~ject covered by an approved co~rehensive pi....' X Yes
6. wili: u.eassi stance requested serve 'a Federal installation?'-' X Yes No
Yes X No ,
Alrport Master Plan/Monroe
NO Cty. Capital Improvements
Program/County Mgr.'sofflce
U.S. Customs Service'lINS&
Dept. of Agriculture} No. of
Personnel: 2 to 4
~
7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or installation'
Yes._~No
, .
,8. Will the assistance requested have an,effect on the environment'
Yes
X t40
9. Willthe'aSsistance requesledeause.the displa~t of individuals, families. businesses, or 'arms?
., . ''''. -, '. .....l.."l ~ .
,
, Yes X
No
10. Is there ottier related assistance for this project previous, pending, or anticipated'
Yes X
No
"
, --
;.~.: ,~ ,:" . .. ,. , .-._, PART III - PROJECT BUDGET
..
.
",COCq~L CATA\.OG T.YPE OF ASSISTANCE F'IAST 9UDGET PERIOD BALANCE OF' PROJECT TOTAL
.. NUMSER LOAN. GRANT. ETC.
.. ; ....
.. (e) , ~ . .. . (b) (e) (d) (e)
20.106 Grant 2,707,894 -
1. .'
2. .. ..
3. ' ,
.. ,
, ,
4- ..
_.
I
5.
6. Tobl Federal Contribution ,
S S $2,707,894
7. State Contribution 451,316
18. Applicant Contribution 451,316
--, ..
9. Other Contributions .
(
10. Totals s s s 3,610,525
I PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT
(A""ch p.' .n",,,,,.'on)
- -
FAA F_ 5100.30 16-711 SUPERSEDES FAA F'ORM 5100-3
Pooe2
PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT
The project proposed in this Pre-Application for Federal Assistance involves
the renovation of approximately 18,000 S.F. of existing terminal building to
house a Federal Inspection Station (F.I.S.) Facility, baggage claim area and
airline-related support areas plus the construction of an approximate 23,000
S.F. of new terminal building space to accommodate airline ticketing, lobby
and related support facilities. The project also includes the connection of
the sewage effl uent system from the termi na 1 construction to the Ci ty
sanitary main.
These projects are needed to meet existing and future demands as well as
to provide for safe and secure operations at the Airport.
A. GeoQraohical Location of Prooosed Airoort Develooment Project Items
Key West International Airport is located in Monroe County, adjacent to
the city of Key West, Florida, at latitude 24033'22"N and longitude
8I04S'3S"W. The existing airfield and terminal were constructed about
25 years ago and have remained essentially the same except for
relatively recent AlP improvements related to safety and required
capacity.
B. Statement re: Inter-Qovernmental Review of Federal ProQrams
All of the proposed project items are exempted from Executive Order
12372 review.
C. Statement re: Environmental Assessment
None of the proposed project items require an Environmental Assessment
as they are "categorical exclusions" as defined in FAA Order SOSO.4A.
1
D. Statement re: No Opposition or Information on Specific Op~osition
There has been no opposition either expressly or by proposed revision of
any of the proposed project items by any Federal, State or local govern-
menta 1 agency or by any other person or agency i nvo 1 vi ng Sect ions
16(c)(l)(a), (c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e) and (f) of the Airport and Airway
Development Act of 1970 as amended.
E. Statement re: Consultation with the Airlines and FBO(sl
The Airport Sponsor has consulted with the Owners and/or official
authorized representatives of all airlines and FBOs and discussed each
proposed airport development project item prior to submission of this
Pre-Application for Federal Assistance. This consultation has included
di scussion of the general nature of each of the proposed development
items, their estimated costs, anticipated date for start of work and
estimated date of completion.
F. Statement re: Aareement to Acquire Adequate Property Interest
The Airport Sponsor currently owns adequate property interest in all
exi st i ng runway c1 ear zones and runway safety areas. The Sponsor
further agrees to acquire adequate property interest and/or avigation
easements in any future runway clear zones and/or runway safety areas as
may be defi ned and deemed necessary and reasonable as a result of any
approved future airport runway development project actions requiring
same.
G. Statement re: Assurance of Completion of Safe. Useful and Usable Units
The Airport Sponsor assures that every effort will be made to complete
each proposed project item within a reasonable time frame and that the
proposed new terminal facility is programmed to provide a safe, useful
and usable unit upon completion of construction.
2
H. Statement re: Aoolicant's EliQibilitv for ReceivinQ Assistance
The Airport Sponsor's eligibility for receiving assistance under Federal
Program No. 20.106 has been previously established by prior receipt of
Grants-in-Aid under the Airport Development Aid Program.
I. Statement/Information re: The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973
The terminal development area under consideration is identified by the
u.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as being located in a
special flood hazard area. The Sponsor is a participant in the National
Flood Insurance Program.
1. Terminal BuildinQ Renovation (18.000+ S.F.)
The existing terminal building will be renovated to provide a Federal
Inspection Station Facility and an expanded airline baggage claim area
and supporting facilities. This renovation is currently being designed
with Federal assistance under the AIP-06 Grant.
2. New Terminal BuildinQ Construction (25.000+ S.F.)
This item provides for a 25,000 S.F. expansion to the existing terminal
building to house airline ticketing and support facilities, aircraft
departure lounge/lobby and supporting facilities.
Both the terminal renovation and new construction will be designed and
constructed in accordance wi th FAA Advi sory Ci rcul ars. The combi ned
area (renovated and new) will contain approximately 13,200 S.F. of non-
public and/or revenue producing floor area making 69.5% of project costs
el igible for the Federal 75% participation rate under the Airport
Improvement Program (AlP).
3
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Pre-Application Cost Estimate
Terminal Building Complex
9/5/91
I. Terminal Project Costs
A. Construction Cost
43,000 S.F. {18,000 S.F. renovate
& 25,000 S.F. New @ $IOO/S.F.
($IOO/S.F. unit cost includes factor for
connecting building effluent to City
sanitary sewer main.)
B. EnQineerinq Costs
I. Renovation design (funded under AIP-06)
2. New construction design - L.S.
.. $ 250,000
3. Construction Phase Costs
(Surveys/Testing/R.E., etc.)
(Estimate 15% of construction costs)
$4,300,000 x 0.15 =
645.000
Total Engineering Costs:
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS:
Ratio Public Use to Total Space = 69.5%
Total costs eligible for FAA Participation:
$5,195,000 x 0.695
FAA Share (75%) ..
Monroe County (12.5%) ..
FOOT (12.5%) =
$2,707,894
$ 451,316
$ 451,316
= $4,300,000
.. $ 895.000
.. $5,195,000
= $3,610,525
'fEDERAL ASSI~.I~"'\"t; ~ej.n.. .), 1:1:11
t. ,...,.. 0# ~ .. OAft MC:CrVC I" ""T1 ...... ~t_ ~
~;uriOIt ~tiOtt N/A N/A
. [J~
,O,~ .
. &....,. ~.., PlJ)CUL AOIMCf ,..,.,., llMnCd...
O~ . O~
.. ~IC.UIT ..~no-
~ .......' ~ioNIUnIt
Monroe County, Florida oard of County Commissioners
.
AdcIrwa ~ otr. ~tr. ,ca... .-d lip eo<H" fWro4 end ~ --0. f/A IN perIOft '" till ~ 01\ 1Nn.t ~ .
CI'loI ICIQlGltClfl ~ MN ~, .
P.O. Box 1029 -
Mr. Peter Horton, Director .
Key West~ Florida Community Services Division
(305) 292-4500
&. Df"\.O\'P lOC~no- IN'Qltt II1Nt: ,. 1"r'Pt 0# ~, ""'.., ~.!A "',.,... ,.,., [g
. [ili]-16 01010 7 I 4 I 9 r A. ~te H. .~ 4l,. If IIr:hoaf Dill.
e. ('..cuttr l .... CcntroIed lNIitlIlX:In d Higher ~
'C~ J, I'riwwte ~ .
L n'P'I 0# ~notf: D.T~ K. ...,., TICe .. .
a..... o Cont__~ o ArMioft. E k\terlUte L~ .'
. ~ enter ~'" len.(I) ift baa(H). 0 0 F.~ .. Profit Org,aNato'l
G SQciII DiItrCt k 0tNt (~
A Irc:rMa A..,-d e 0Ic:t..... Award C. ~ Duration
D o.:na- 0I.ItatCf' ()ther (U*:IfyJ: .. IiW'I 0# nl)(lI.Al. A4DCt:
Federal Aviation Administration -.
Orlando Airports District Office
'L e,t.TAlOO 0# 'Cfll.Al. OOMtsnC 2 I 0 I. 1 10 I 6 u. OU~1mvt: mu 0# ~ Pl'.on;cT:
AS4l$T.t.IoICl ..Vttll'" Marathon Airport
Tm.E.; Airport Improvement Program
(See attached Part IV Narrative for
'L A.ItLU AnICT'EO'" PttOJICT (OHS. CQIft'..1. ''''''1. .rc t Item descriptions)
.
Marathon, Monroe County, Florida
.
'I. ~ lI'tlOJICT; '4. CO'COUSSlOl'CAl. 0lSTlt1CTl Ol'.
Sat1 OllIe Er>d.n; 0.'" .~nt ~b.~
9/3/91 9/3/94 15th 15th
.
,.. ISTlMATnl ~NOlHQ: It. 1$ AH\.1CA'nOllt WLtICT TO ~ .., STAlIlXlCU'lM ~ Inn 1'tlOenS'
e F~aJ I 4,893,658 .co . YES THIS PREJ.PPl.CAllONfAP9UCA1lON WAS UAOE AV~ TO nE
STATE EXEOJT1YE QAOER 121tZ ~ FOA PEV'EW ON
b,~t I 563,961 .00 DATE
,-~ ,
Co Slat.t I 563,961 .00 0
b NO PAC:lGs:w.t cs HOT ~ BY E.O Inn
d Loc:.II I JIG 0
. OR ~ HAS HOT IlEEH saECTED IV STATE FOA PEVEW
. O!tw< I .00
" Ptog<_ ~ I .00 ". . nc ~ ~ OIIIlMffIII)PAL oan
; TOTAL. I 6,021,580 .00 .0 't.. · .'"Y....~an~ OHo
'.. to 1Hl NSf 011 If\' ~ MO ~.ALl OATA" nus ~ft)IC~noH AJlC l'ltUI AND~ M DOC:UUhf"", lOtI ~'t
AUTMO'lIZ'm ..,1tC00fI1l1ll1llQ lOO'tCl'tMI....uc.urT...one~..... ~'twmc1tC AnACMID &U~.1'tC AUCT.u.a. .....~
., T~ N..... oI-~ ~_~'- I. 'ltle Director, Community cT~~
Peter Horton Services Division ( 305-) 292 -4500
~lo(~~ ~ t . ~ Soo-2
, r'\ ',..,r J _~ '1-(0-; ,
1 C\-....... /' ,,\.,~ U v-
~~~tlQnl Not u",U S4nca.d ~OI'''' 414 .Qt.V 4.U
"'nc'o.d 0, OVB t:..,..... A. '02
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO
I_ fEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATlOH
OMU NO eo.rtl)ll!IJ
PREAPPlICA TION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
PART II
1. Does this assistance recuest require State, local, regional or other priority raling? _,_ Yes
x
No
2. Does this assistance reQulle State or local advisory, educational or heallh clearance? X
Yes
No
3. Does this assistance reQucst reQulrc Clearinghouse review?
X
Yes
No
4. Does this assistance reQuest require State, local, reeional or other planning approval'
X
X
Yes No
Alrport Master Plan/Monroe Cty.
No Capital Improvpmpnt Pro~ram/
County Manager's Office
5. Is the proposed plojcct covered by an approved comprehensive pl(J1?
Yes
6. Will the asSl stance requested serve a federal Installation'
7. Will the assistance requested be on federal land or installation?
Yes X
No
9. Will the assistance requested cause the displacement 01 Individuals, lamilies, bUSinesses, or larms?
X
Yes
Yes
X
No
8. YJillthe assistance requested have an ellect on the environment'
~lo
Yes X
No
10. Is there other related assistance lor this project previous, pending, or anticipated?
Yes
X
No
PART III - PROJECT BUDGET
FEOEq~L. CATAL.O~ TYPE OF ASSISTANCE I
NUMBER L.OAN. GRANT, ETC. FIRST 9UOGET PERIOO BAL.ANCE OF PROJECT TOTAL.
I (0) (h) (e) (d) (t)
1. 20.106 Grant -t 4,893,658.00
~
2.
3. ~
4.
5.
6. Tolal Federal Contribution S S S 4,893,658.00
7. State Contribution Joint Participatic n Agreements I
563,961. 00
8. Applicant Contribution Airport General Fund & Monroe Co nty
Capital ImprOVE ments Revenue Bon Fund 563.961. 00
9. Other Contributions -0-
--
10. T atals S S S 6,021,580.00
-, - " .. --- ---
-, - - - - - - . .. - - - ="~, '-=
PART IV _ PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT
. (AtlQch pet in,'.uel.on)
._,_J
FAA F"nll SIOO.JO 16-731 SUPERSEOES FAA FORM S100.3
Pog" 2
PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT
The project proposed in this Pre-Application for Federal Assistance involves
the following items to be developed at the Marathon Airport:
1. Construct 19,OOO{!) S.F. Terminal Building
2. Construct Terminal water service main
3. Construct Terminal sewage treatment plant
4. Construct Airport Terminal access road
5. Construct/Rehabilitate/Mark/Light Terminal aircraft parking apron (5
positions) for new Terminal
6. Construct 1,700{!) L.F. security fencing (including one automatic
gate)
7. Landscape Terminal access road and buffer strip
8. Demolition of existing Terminal site
9. Relocation of power line
These projects are needed to meet existing and future demands as well as to
provide for safe and secure operations at the Airport.
A. GeoQraphical Location of Proposed Airport Development Project Items
Marathon Airport is located in Monroe County, 10 miles east of the city
of Marathon in Marathon Shores, Florida, at latitude 24043'10"N and
longitude 81003'05"W. The original airstrip was constructed during
Worl d War II and operated by the Navy. After the war the stri p was
operated and maintained by the State of Florida Road Department under an
agreement with the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads. The airstrip was later
conveyed to Monroe County in 1958 and has remained essentially the same
except for relatively recent AlP improvements related to safety and
increase in general aviation aircraft parking capacity.
1
B. Statement re: Inter-aovernmental Review of Federal Proarams
A DRI study is presently under way for the project. The items to be
developed under this project will be designed to comply with the study
results.
C. Statement re: Environmental Assessment
None of the proposed project items require an Environmental Assessment
as they are "categorical exclusions" as defined in FAA Order 5050.4A.
D. Statement re: No Opposition or Information on Specific Opposition
There has been no opposition either expressly or by proposed revision of
any of the proposed project items by any Federal, State or local govern-
mental agency or by any other person or agency involving Sections
16(c)(l)(a}, (c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e) and (f) of the Airport and Airway
Development Act of 1970 as amended.
E. Statement re: Consultation with the Airlines and FBO(s)
The Airport Sponsor has consulted with the Owners and/or official
authorized representatives of all airlines and FBOs and discussed each
proposed airport development project item prior to submission of this
Pre-Application for Federal Assistance. This consultation has included
discuss i on of the general nature of each of the proposed development
items, their estimated costs, anticipated date for start of work and
estimated date of completion.
F. Statement re: Aareement to Acquire Adequate Property Interest
The Airport Sponsor currently owns adequate property interest in all
exi st i ng runway cl ear zones and runway safety areas. The Sponsor
further agrees to acqui re adequate property interest and/or avigat ion
2
easements in any future runway clear zones and/or runway safety areas as
may be defined and deemed necessary and reasonable as a result of any
approved future airport runway development project actions requi ring
same.
G. Statement re: Assurance of Comoletion of Safe. Useful and Usable Units
The Airport Sponsor assures that every effort will be made to complete
each proposed project item within a reasonable time frame and that the
proposed new terminal facility is programmed to provide a safe, useful
and usable unit upon completion of construction.
H. Statement re: Aoolicant's Eliqibilitv for Receivinq Assistance
The Airport Sponsor's eligibility for receiving assistance under Federal
Program No. 20.106 has been previously established by prior receipt of
Grants-in-Aid under the Airport Development Aid Program.
I. Statement/Information re: The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973
The terminal development area under consideration is identified by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as being located in a
special flood hazard area. The Sponsor is a participant in the National
Flood Insurance Program.
1. Construct 19.000(~) S.F. Terminal BuildinQ
Monroe County conducted a Terminal Area Study and is developing plans
and specifications for a new terminal complex under FAA Grant AlP
Project 3-12-0044-08. The Terminal Area Study contains the justifica-
tion for the new terminal complex and contains an analysis of the build-
i ng floor area needed to meet the termi na l' s forecasted needs in
accordance with FAA Advisory Circulars AC150/5360-9 "Planning and Design
of Airport Terminal Building Facil ities at Non-Hub Locations" and
3
ACI50/5360-13 "Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal
Facil ities".
This item is for the construction of the 19,000(!) square foot facility
recommended for development in the Terminal Area Study which is on file
with the FAA Orlando Airports District Office.
An analysis of the floor plan of the proposed terminal building included
with the 30% completed plans submitted to the FAA for review under the
AIP-08 Grant indicates that 5,590 S.F. is scheduled to be used as reve-
nue producing and/or non-public use space. The remaining 13,410 S.F. is
proposed for public use, therefore, making 70.6% of the building costs
eligible for FAA participation at the 75% rate.
2. Construct Terminal Water Service Main
This item includes the construction of approximately 8,500 L.F. of 12"
diameter water main looped off the existing 30" diameter Florida Keys
Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) main which parallels U.S. Highway No.1 and
the terminal. 6" diameter spurs will be taken off the 12" diameter loop
systems to serve the fire demand for the new terminal building complex.
Design of the potable water mains will be in accordance with FKAA
requirements and designed for a 150 ps~ working pressure requirement.
3. Construct Terminal SewaQe Treatment Plant
It is not feas i bl e to connect the buil di ng effl uent to the nearest
existing treatment facility, therefore, the item includes construction
of a self-contained sewage treatment plant to serve the new facility.
A 20,000 gallon per day package sewage plant will be located on the east
side of the development site. The sewage waste treatment plant is of
the extended aeration type with the treated effluent having the disposal
4
options of Class V well or sub-surface irrigation. The sewage treatment
collection system contains the following three elements:
o Element one carries the restaurant waste from the building to a 750
gallon grease trap which discharges into the lift station.
o Element two carries the building sanitary waste directly to the lift
station.
o El ement three cons i sts of the 1 ift station wh i ch has dual gri nder
pumps which transport the sewage to the treatment plant via a force
main.
The plant consists of six precast concrete tanks interconnected by PVC
piping with bronze valving. There are dual air blowers with automatic
aeration equipment control in the electric control panels.
The Class V disposal wells consist of a concrete box with cover contain-
ing two drilled holes 90' in depth cased with 8" PVC Schedule 40 pipe
grouted to a depth of 60' .
The lift station to be located at the new terminal building will be a
four-foot diameter precast concrete element containing two grinder pumps
and level control elements. The primary control panel is stanchion
mounted above ground. The control panel contains electrical protection,
pump controls, alternator and elapsed time meter.
The collection system and force main are constructed of PVC pipe.
The sewage treatment plant will be served by an underground feeder from
the Florida Keys Electric Cooperative (FKEC) 25 KV system. Service to
the plant will be 208 volts, 3 phase from three single phase pad-mounted
transformers provided by FKEC. Util ity metering will .be mounted adja-
cent to the transformers.
5
Emergency power will be provided by running a circuit from the existing
75 KW standby diesel generator system located at the existing airfield
electrical vault.
4. Construct Airpor~Terminal Access Road
The Airport's main public access is from u.s. 1. This newly improved,
four-lane divided highway provides the only public access to the Airport
and is the only public highway linking the various Florida Keys to main-
land Florida. During seasonal periods, u.s. 1 experiences congestion in
and around the existing terminal entrance intersection.
The Marathon Volunteer Fire Department facility is located approximately
200' west of the existing terminal entrance intersection. The close
proximity of these two intersections, at best, is undesirable and may be
an unsafe condition for responding emergency vehicles, terminal traffic
and u.s. 1 vehicular traffic.
This existing Airport entrance will be physically closed with curbing
and the new entrance will be located approximately 1,200' east. A
secondary Airport access roadway will be located at the existing fire
station/U.S. 1 intersection. This intersection will be marked based on
a signal warrant analysis. Based on the final analysis, this intersec-
tion may require additional or supplementary signalization. Accelera-
tion and deceleration lanes along with any median modification will also
be provided.
The new two-way, two-lane Airport access roadway to be constructed under
this item will be parallel to U.S. 1 on Airport property providing
access to all parking areas and the new terminal building. The existing
dirt access road will not be connected to the Airport access road on the
east side but will remain connected to the fire station and dirt access
road on the west side.
6
A three-l ane termi na 1 bu il ding access roadway connecting with the new
Airport access roadway will be provided. This three-lane roadway will
provide one lane for parking at the terminal curb for loading and
unloading, one lane for maneuvering of vehicles and one lane for through
traffi c. Traffi c ci rcul at ion in front of the termi na 1 is one-way and
counter-clockwise for convenience of right side loading and unloading of
vehicles. A long canopy is provided for the curbside lane to protect
enplaning and deplaning passengers from inclement weather.
The terminal building roadway provides for the efficient recirculation
of vehicles to the terminal building by way of the connecting ingress
and egress lanes of the Airport access roadway. The terminal building
and Airport access roadways arrangement allows efficient vehicular
access to all areas in the terminal complex without the need to enter
the U.S. 1 traffic flow.
Vehicles making deliveries to the terminal building will utilize the
terminal access roadway during non-peak traffic periods.
The Airport and terminal building access roadways shall comply with the
following codes and standards:
1. Florida Department of Transportation Standards
2. Monroe County Code
3. FAA Advisory Circular AC150j5360-9
4. National Electric Code
The following summarizes the requirements for design of the Airport and
terminal access roadways:
1. One-way counter-clockwise traffic flow for terminal access roadway.
2. Three lanes consisting of two 11' wide lanes (through traffic and
maneuvering) and one 8' wide lane (passenger drop-off and pick up)
with curb and gutter.
7
3. Roadway pavement to be 3" limerock base with a 2" bituminous asphalt
surface course.
4. 15 mph posted speed 1imit.
5. Traffic separation islands at bot entrance and exit points of
terminal building roadway.
6. Entrances to Airport roadway to be based on results of signal
warrant analysis, driveway permit approvals and traffic impact
study.
7. Airport and terminal access roadway lighting will be provided using
sharp cut-off type pole mounted fixtures. Design 1 ight level will
be 2 FC average maintained with the maximum to minimum levels not to
exceed a 4:1 ration. Roadway lighting will be controlled by photo-
cell or manually.
5. Construct/Rehabil itate/Mark/LiQht Terminal Aircraft ParkinQ Apron (5
Positions) For New Terminal
An aircraft apron capable of accommodating five commuter type aircraft
positions will be constructed under this item and located north and
adj acent to the new termi na 1 bu il ding. The apron will be ill umi nated
using light standards approximately 20' high with fuliy adjustable,
sharp cut-off fixtures to maximize ground 1 ighting while minimizing
unwanted glarE', Medium intensity taxiway lights (MITL) with blue lenses
will match with existing Taxiway "A" through the 75' apron edge radii.
Grounding rods will be provided at various locations for fueling opera-
tions.
Based on current and future a i rcra ft requ i rements, the apron wi 11 be
capable of accommodating the following aircraft types: .
8
Max.
Gross
Aircraft Type A.R.C. Wingspan Length Weight
Beech 1900 BII 55 ft. 58 ft. 16,600 lbs.
Jetstream 31 BII 52 ft. 48 ft. 14,600 lbs.
Cessna 402 BI 40 ft. 36 ft. 6,300 lbs.
Shorts 360 BII 75 ft. 71 ft. 26,460 lbs.
F-28 - 3000 BII 78 ft. 90 ft. 65,000 lbs.
EMB 120 BII 65 ft. 66 ft. 25,400 lbs.
The apron wi 11 be designed in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory
Circulars.
The apron pavement design will be predicated on the F-28-3000 aircraft
with a maximum gross weight of 65,000 lbs. OWL.
Preliminary apron design is based on current knowledge of the site and
general conditions within the Florida Keys. The following preliminary
criteria was used for estimating purposes only. Final design will be
modified as necessary upon finalization of the geotechnical investiga-
tion of the site.
1. 65,000 OWL with 3,000 annual departures.
2. Assumed subgrade modul us of 300 PCI with 650 PSI concrete at 28
days.
3. Six inches of either P-304 )cement treated base course) or P-306
(Econocrete base course).
4. Nine inches of P-501 (P.C.C. surface course).
Apron ground rods will be connectpd ta &~~ ~. 'ding grounding system to
provide a low resistance ~J ground.
L86IT Laxiway lights with red or blue lenses to be utilized to delineate
2pron.
9
Aircraft obstruction clearance will be 10' and a wing tip to adjacent
aircraft wing tip cl~arance of 20' due to lack of available obstruction-
free maneuvering area. All aircraft operations on the apron shall be
directed by airline ground personnel.
6. Construct 1.700(+) l.F. Security FencinQ (IncludinQ One Automatic Gate)
In compliance with FAA Federal Aviation Regulation Part 107, fencing to
secure the Marathon Airport airside will be provided with connections to
existing airside fencing at the fire station to the west and to existing
airside fencing to the east. Existing fencing around the airfield elec-
trical vault will be replaced with new fencing to increase the level of
security for this facility. Approximately 1,700 L.F. of new (6' high
fabric) chain link fence will be required.
An automatic sliding gate will be provided for controlled airside access
from the rental car/employee parking area. A manually operated sliding
gate will be provided for access to the airfield electrical vault.
The fence will be designed to meet FAA design requirements.
7. landscaoe Terminal Access Road and Buffer Strio
The Monroe County Land Development Regulations require that the Airport
access road and related development meet certain minimum landscaping
requirements. The land Development Regulations also require the Airport
to provide a landscaped buffer strip (30 to 40' wide) between the
Airport access road and U,S. 1. There are no variance provisions to
these requirements. Therefore, this item provides for the minimum land-
scaping and associated irrigation system to meet these code require-
ments.
In order to comply with the regulations while also accommodating the new
terminal area development, landscaping along the Florida Department of
10
Transportation (FOOT) right-of-way will be required to achieve the 30'
"E" buffer. Use of this land for landscaping will be acceptable to the
FOOT upon execution of an FOOT "Special Permit" by Monroe County.
8. Demolition of ExistinQ Terminal Site
Due to the age and condition of the existing terminal building and asso-
ciated facilities, the building could not be used for new terminal
development. This item will demolish the existing building, parking
lots and related utilities after the new terminal building has been
opened and the existing building no longer needed.
The existing aircraft parking apron will be rehabilitated and integrated
into the new terminal aircraft parking apron.
9. Relocation of Power Line
An existing overhead 25KV electrical transmission line crosses the
project site. This item will construct an underground duct bank system
and relocate the line in the duct system so as not to obstruct other
construction being accomplished on this project.
An overhead relocation is not feasible based on information available at
this time due to lack of space, conflicts with existing utilities
located in the area, code landscaping requirements, obstructions to
access roadway systems and related items.
11
MARATHON AIRPORT
Pre-Application Project Costs
Cost Breakdown
9/3/91
*For detailed cost breakdowns, see Reynolds, Smith & Hills's Cost Estimates
submitted to FAA with 30% Plan Submittal.
I. Terminal Buildinq Construction Items eEl iqible for 75% FAA
Participation}
A. Item No.1 - 19,000 S.F. Terminal Building
Cost of building = $3,395,198*
Ratio Public Use/Non-Public Use = 70.6%*
Amount eliqible for 75% FAA Participation:
$3,395,198 x 0.706 =
$2.397.010
B. Item No.2 - Water Service Main
Total Construction Cost Eligible for 75% rate:
$ 457.700*
C. Item No.3 - Sewage Treatment Plant
Total Construction Cost Eligible for 75% rate:
$ 193.200*
Total Construction Cost Eligible for 75% rate:
Engrg. Costs (Surveys/Testing/RE, etc.)
(Est. 15% of Construction Cost):
$3.047.910
457.186
Total Project Cost Eligible for 75%:
$3.505.096
FAA (75%)
Monroe County (12.5%) =
FOOT (l2.5%)
$2,628,822
$ 438,137
$ 438,137
=
1 of 2
II. Other Construction Costs lEliqible at 90% FAA Rate)
Pre-App.
Item No. Item Descriotion
4 Access Roads
5 Aircraft Parking Apron
6 Security Fencing
7 Landscaping
8 Demolition of Existing Terminal
9 Relocation of Power Line
Construction
Costs*
$ 535,986
791,200
27,485
431,250
199,927
202.400
Total Construction Cost {eligible @ 90% rate):
Engrg. Costs (Surveys/Testing/RE, etc.)
(Est. 15% of Construction Cost):
$2.188.248
328.237
Total Project Cost Eligible for 90%:
$2.516.485
FAA (90%)
Monroe County (5%)
FOOT (5%)
= $2,264,836
= $ 125,824
= $ 125,824
Pre-ADD. Cost Summary
FAA Monroe
Total Costs Share County FOOT
75% Rate = $3,505,096 $2,628,822 $438,137 $438,137
90% Rate = 2.516,485 2,264.836 125.824 125.824
TOTALS: $6,021,580 $4,893,658 $563,961 $563,961
2 of 2