Loading...
Item I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: June ~ 2002 Division: County Attorney AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Request direction from the BOCC in the matter of an order awarding attorney's fees to the FKAA in Florida Keys Aqueduct Authoritv. Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners and Ogden Water SYstems. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Court awarded the FKAA a total of $83,210 in attorney's fees and $2517.85 in costs as a result of the Key Largo sewer project Sunshine Law litigation. The Court ruled that the Motions were timely filed rejecting County's arguments that the request for fees was untimely, and that FKAA's own staff served on the Committee. The new rule has yet to be interpreted by the appel/ate courts so the prospects for Success are an unknown. Success on appeal could eliminate the County's liability. Failure could subject the County to further exposure for attorney's fees, estimated at $7,000 - $15,000. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: See above. CONTRACT I AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDAnONS: TOTAL COST: BUDGETED: Yes 0 No 0 COST TO COUNTY: APPROVED BY: County Attorney. OMB/Purchaslng 0 Risk Management 0 DIVISION DIRECTORAPPROVAL~~7 JAM T. HE RICK DOCUMENTAnON: Included 0 To Follow Not Required 0 AGENDA ITEM # J-/ , , IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTIiORITY, PlaintUI: Case No. CA-K-Oo-U70 v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA and OGDEN WATER SYSTEMS OF KEY LARGO, INC., Defendants. w .~@~ IT~!? i- KEYS CITIZENS FOR RESPONSffiLE GOVERNMENT, INC., ! ~ (' APR 1 2 2002 Intervenor. / ORDER TIllS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's ("FKAA") Motion to Tax Costs and Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees, and the Court having reviewed the motions and attachments thereto, heard the respective arguments of the parties at a hearing on March 25, 2002, having reviewed the case file and being otherwise fully advised of the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. In September, 2000, FKAA brought this action against the Board of County Commissioners, Monroe County (the "Boara") and Odgen Water Systems of Key Largo, Inc. ("Ogden"), seeking a declaration as to whether the Board had violated section 286.011, Florida Statutes, generally referred to as the Government in the Sunshine Law ("Sunshine Law"). Key Citizens for Responsible Government, Inc. ("Citizens") was thereafter permitted to intervene. 2. Thereafter, Citizens moved for partial sununary judgment on the issue of whether the Board's Technical Evaluation Panel ("TEP") was bound by the Sunshine Law, and the Court entered an order adjudicating that the TEP was bound to follow the dictates of the Sunshine Law. 3. The Court subsequently held a one-day trial to detennine whether the Board, through the TEP, violated the Sunshine Law. Following the presentation of evidence, the Court entered a final judgment in favor of FKAA and Citizens, concluding that the Board, through the TEP, had violated the Sunshine Law. 4. The Board and Ogden appealed this final judgment, but these appeals were thereafter dismissed. 5. FKAA recovered judgment against the Board on its claim of a violation of the Sunshine Law. 6. . As the party recovering judgment, FKAA is entitled to recover its legal costs and charges. ~ 57.041(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). 7. The Court finds that based on the costs affidavit provided by FKAA and the arguments and evidence presented at the hearing held on March 25, 2002, that FKAA expended a total of$392.85 in taxable costs in recovering judgment against the Board. 8. Accordingly, FKAA's Motion to Tax Costs is hereby GRANTED. 9. The Court also concludes thatFKAA is entitled to recover the fees of its expert witness, William N. "Buck" DeVane, who testified at the hearing on FKAA's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees as part of FKAA's recoverable costs. The Court finds that $2125.00 is a \ reasonable expert witness fee for the services of Mr. De Vane in preparing for and attending the March 25,2002, hearing, and that FKAA is entitled to an award of this amount from the Board. 10. The Court also concludes that pursuant to section 286.0Il(4), Florida Statutes (2000), FKAA is entitled to an award of its reasonable attorneys' fees, to be assessed' against the 2 Board: Whenever an action has been filed against any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision to enforce the provisions of [the Sunshine Law] or to invalidate the actions of any such board, commission, agency, or authority, which action was taken in violation of [the Sunshine Law], and the court detennines that the defendant or defendants to such action acted in violation of [the Sunshine Law], the court shall assess a reasonable attorney's fee against such agency... ~ 286.011(4), Fla. Stat. (2000). Such an award is required pursuant to this section, as well as applicable caselaw. See. ~ Indian River County Hospital District v. Indian River Memorial Hosj)ital. Inc.. 766 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (concluding that the trial court erred by failing to assess attorneys' fees against a nonprofit hospital corporation found to have violated the Sunshine Law, as "section 286.011(4) requires attorney's fees to be assessed against [the corporation]. "). 11. In determining the amount of such an award, the Court has considered the affidavits presented by F. Alan Cummings and Robert T. Feldman in support ofFKAA's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees, the time and labor required in this case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions and issues involved in this case, the skill required to successfully pursue this case, the customary fee for comparable legal services, the time limitations involved in this case, the results obtained in this case, and the experience, reputation, and the ability of the attorneys' rendering services. Based on the affidavits presented, as well as the expert testimony of William N. "Buck" DeVane presented by FKAA at the March 25, 2002, hearing, the Court concludes that a reasonable attorneys' fee for the time expended by the law firm of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP is $68,800.00, and a reasonable attorneys' fee for the time expended by the law firm of Feldman, Koenig & Highsmith, P.A, is $13,620.00. 12. The Court also concludes that FKAA is entitled to a reasonable attorneys' fee for 3 the time expended proving its entitlement to such fees. The Court finds that $500.00 is a reasonable attorneys' fee for preparation and appearance time of F. Alan Cummings of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP at the hearing on FKAA's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees, and that $290.00 is a reasonable attorneys' fee for preparation and appearance time of Robert T. Feldman of Feldman, Koenig & Highsmith, P.A at the hearing on FKAA's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees. FKAA is therefore entitled to attorneys' fees in a total amount of$83,21O.oo. 13. Accordingly, FKAA's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees is hereby GRANTED. It is, therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that FKAA shall recover from the Board the amount of $2517.85 in taxable costs, that shall bear interest at the statutory rate of nine percent (11%) per year, for which sum let execution issue; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that FKAA shall recover from the Board the amount of $83,210.00 in reasonable attorneys' fees, that shall bear interest at the statutory rate of nine percent (9%) per year, for which sum let execution issue. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Kc...t.f UJ('5J-, Monroe County, I (J day of April, 2002. . Florida, this qlCHARD Q. PAYNe Copies to: RICHARD G. PAYNE, Circuit Judge Robert B. Shillinger, Jr. Assistant County Attorney Post Office Box 1026 Key West, FL 33041-1026 John A Jabro 90311 Overseas Highway, Suite B Tavernier, FL 33070-2445a 4 Robert Rivas The Rivas Law Firm 311 South Calhoun Street, Suite 206 Tallahassee, FL 32301 F. Alan Cummings Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP 1004 DeSoto Park Drive Post Office Box 589 Tallahassee, FL 32302-0589 Robert T. Feldman Feldman, Koenig & Highsmith, P.A 3158 Northside Drive Key West, FL 33040 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16m JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CAK-OO-1170 FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, vs. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA and OGDEN WATER SYSTEMS OF KEY LARGO, INC., Defendants. ~' ;~ IT!.: Ii"'J f!i11I ~ m G ~r! '- "J \~ lEtJ VI lJi:g: I:; _I- II' MAY 062002 " KEYS CITIZENS FOR RESPONSmLE GOVERNMENT, INC., - Intervenor. / FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE This matter, having come' before the Court on the Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida's Motion to Strike Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Motion to Tax Costs, and having heard the argument of counsel, the Circuit Court of the 16th Judicial Circuit in and for Monroe County, Florida, does hereby: . Find that the Response in Opposition to the Motion to Award Attorney's Fees and Motion to Tax Costs was considered by the Court to be a Motion to Strike the Motion for A ward of Attorney's Fees and Motion to Tax Costs on the grounds that said motions were untimely; and the Court further Finds that the record in this case indicates that the Trial Court entered its final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and Intervenor on May 16, 2001; and the Court further Finds that the record indicates that the Third District Court of Appeals dismissed the Defendant's appeal on September 11,2001; and the Court further Finds that the Third District Court of Appeals relinquished jurisdiction in this matter when it denied the Motion for Rehearing on Attorney's Fees (appellate), filed by Plaintiff Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, on or about October 17, 2001; and the Court further Finds that the Motion to Award Attorney's Fees and Motion to Tax Costs were filed on October 12,2001 prior to the decision of the Third District Court of Appeals to deny the Motion for Rehearing; and the Court further Finds that under FlaR.Civ.P. 1.525, the time period for filing the Motion for Attorney's Fees expired thirty days after the Third DCA denied the Motion for Rehearing, not from the date the Trial Court entered final judgment nor from the date the Third DCA dismissed the appeal as argued by the County; and the Court therefore DENIES Monroe County's Motion to Strike because the Motion for Attorney's Fees and Motion to Tax Costs were timely filed. DONE AND ORDERED this .;J... day of --t21~ .2002 in Chambers, Key West, Florida 33040, nunc pro tunc to March 25,2002. n . vaM~'7:J& The Honorable Richard payn~ Chief Judge cc: Robert T. Feldman, 3158 Northside Drive, Key West, FL 33040 F. Alan Cummings, 1004 DeSoto Park Drive, PO Box 589, Tallahassee, FL 32302-0589 Robert Rivas, 311 S. Calhoun Street, Ste. 206, Tallahassee, FL 32301 Robert B. Shillinger, Jr., PO Box 1026, Key West, FL 33041-1026 John A. Jabro, 90311 Overseas Hwy., Ste. B, Tavernier, FL 33070